U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-07094 EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER) MARYLAND 13-2711135 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 300 ONE JACKSON PLACE 188 EAST CAPITOL STREET JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) Registrant's telephone number: (601) 354-3555 Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES (x) NO ( ) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one) Large Accelerated Filer (x) Accelerated Filer ( ) Non-accelerated Filer ( ) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ( ) NO (x) The number of shares of common stock, $.0001 par value, outstanding as of August 7, 2006 was 22,214,935.
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. FORM 10-Q TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 <TABLE> <S> <C> <C> Pages PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements Consolidated balance sheets, June 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005 3 Consolidated statements of income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited) 4 Consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity for the six months ended June 30, 2006 (unaudited) 5 Consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited) 6 Notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited) 7 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 13 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 23 Item 4. Controls and Procedures 24 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1A. Risk Factors 24 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 24 Item 6. Exhibits 24 SIGNATURES Authorized signatures 25 </TABLE>
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA) <TABLE> <CAPTION> June 30, 2006 December 31, 2005 ----------------------------------------- (Unaudited) <S> <C> <C> ASSETS Real estate properties........................................................ $ 945,511 943,585 Development................................................................... 89,360 77,483 ----------------------------------------- 1,034,871 1,021,068 Less accumulated depreciation............................................... (217,524) (206,427) ----------------------------------------- 817,347 814,641 Real estate held for sale..................................................... - 773 Unconsolidated investment..................................................... 2,626 2,618 Cash.......................................................................... 1,526 1,915 Other assets.................................................................. 45,353 43,591 ----------------------------------------- TOTAL ASSETS................................................................ $ 866,852 863,538 ========================================= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY LIABILITIES Mortgage notes payable........................................................ $ 342,339 346,961 Notes payable to banks........................................................ 135,548 116,764 Accounts payable & accrued expenses........................................... 20,875 22,941 Other liabilities............................................................. 10,441 10,306 ----------------------------------------- 509,203 496,972 ----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Minority interest in joint ventures............................................. 2,062 1,702 ----------------------------------------- STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Series C Preferred Shares; $.0001 par value; 600,000 shares authorized; no shares issued............................................................ - - Series D 7.95% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares and additional paid-in capital; $.0001 par value; 1,320,000 shares authorized and issued; stated liquidation preference of $33,000.................................... 32,326 32,326 Common shares; $.0001 par value; 68,080,000 shares authorized; 22,214,449 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2006 and 22,030,682 at December 31, 2005............................................. 2 2 Excess shares; $.0001 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued............................................................ - - Additional paid-in capital on common shares................................... 392,500 390,155 Distributions in excess of earnings........................................... (69,787) (57,930) Accumulated other comprehensive income........................................ 546 311 ----------------------------------------- 355,587 364,864 ----------------------------------------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY.................................... $ 866,852 863,538 ========================================= </TABLE> See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) (UNAUDITED) <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, ---------------------------------------------------- 2006 2005 2006 2005 ---------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> REVENUES Income from real estate operations......................................... $ 33,187 30,464 65,808 59,882 Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment............................ 65 127 139 289 Other...................................................................... 15 100 34 170 ---------------------------------------------------- 33,267 30,691 65,981 60,341 ---------------------------------------------------- EXPENSES Expenses from real estate operations....................................... 9,287 8,582 18,321 16,800 Depreciation and amortization.............................................. 10,310 9,540 20,760 18,370 General and administrative................................................. 1,636 1,795 3,444 3,693 Minority interest in joint ventures........................................ 136 114 273 243 ---------------------------------------------------- 21,369 20,031 42,798 39,106 ---------------------------------------------------- OPERATING INCOME............................................................. 11,898 10,660 23,183 21,235 OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) Interest income............................................................ 21 85 43 209 Interest expense........................................................... (6,397) (5,832) (12,732) (11,770) ---------------------------------------------------- INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS ........................................... 5,522 4,913 10,494 9,674 ---------------------------------------------------- DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS Income from real estate operations......................................... 38 221 159 619 Gain on sale of real estate investments.................................... 16 754 1,084 1,131 ---------------------------------------------------- INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS ......................................... 54 975 1,243 1,750 ---------------------------------------------------- NET INCOME................................................................... 5,576 5,888 11,737 11,424 Preferred dividends-Series D............................................... 656 656 1,312 1,312 ---------------------------------------------------- NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS.................................. $ 4,920 5,232 10,425 10,112 ==================================================== BASIC PER COMMON SHARE DATA Income from continuing operations.......................................... $ .22 .20 .42 .39 Income from discontinued operations........................................ - .04 .06 .08 ---------------------------------------------------- Net income available to common stockholders................................ $ .22 .24 .48 .47 ==================================================== Weighted average shares outstanding........................................ 21,932 21,755 21,907 21,326 ==================================================== DILUTED PER COMMON SHARE DATA Income from continuing operations.......................................... $ .22 .20 .41 .39 Income from discontinued operations........................................ - .04 .06 .08 ---------------------------------------------------- Net income available to common stockholders................................ $ .22 .24 .47 .47 ==================================================== Weighted average shares outstanding........................................ 22,237 22,073 22,222 21,638 ==================================================== Dividends declared per common share.......................................... $ .490 .485 .980 .970 </TABLE> See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA) (UNAUDITED) <TABLE> <CAPTION> Accumulated Additional Distributions Other Preferred Common Paid-In In Excess Comprehensive Stock Stock Capital Of Earnings Income Total ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2005.......................... $ 32,326 2 390,155 (57,930) 311 364,864 Comprehensive income Net income....................................... - - - 11,737 - 11,737 Net unrealized change in fair value of interest rate swap.............................. - - - - 235 235 --------- Total comprehensive income..................... 11,972 --------- Common dividends declared, $.98 per share......... - - - (22,282) - (22,282) Preferred stock dividends declared, $.9938 per share........................................ - - - (1,312) - (1,312) Stock-based compensation, net of forfeitures...... - - 2,212 - - 2,212 Issuance of 3,413 shares of common stock, dividend reinvestment plan....................... - - 160 - - 160 Other............................................. - - (27) - - (27) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BALANCE, JUNE 30, 2006.............................. $ 32,326 2 392,500 (69,787) 546 355,587 ============================================================================== </TABLE> See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED) <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six Months Ended June 30, ------------------------------------- 2006 2005 ------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income.............................................................................. $ 11,737 11,424 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations.............................. 20,760 18,370 Depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations............................ 182 488 Minority interest depreciation and amortization....................................... (75) (70) Amortization of mortgage loan premiums................................................ (215) (148) Gain on sale of real estate investments from discontinued operations.................. (1,084) (1,131) Stock-based compensation expense...................................................... 766 809 Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment net of distributions.................. (9) 41 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accrued income and other assets..................................................... (1,777) (342) Accounts payable, accrued expenses and prepaid rent................................. (563) 1,452 ------------------------------------- NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES................................................. 29,722 30,893 ------------------------------------- INVESTING ACTIVITIES Real estate development................................................................. (30,392) (25,587) Purchases of real estate................................................................ - (23,891) Real estate improvements................................................................ (6,125) (5,077) Proceeds from sale of real estate investments........................................... 18,541 5,795 Repayments on mortgage loans receivable................................................. - 6,750 Distributions from unconsolidated investment............................................ - 6,645 Changes in other assets and other liabilities........................................... (2,812) 101 ------------------------------------- NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES..................................................... (20,788) (35,264) ------------------------------------- FINANCING ACTIVITIES Proceeds from bank borrowings........................................................... 80,856 71,417 Repayments on bank borrowings........................................................... (62,072) (69,798) Principal payments on mortgage notes payable............................................ (4,359) (7,935) Debt issuance costs..................................................................... (119) (85) Distributions paid to stockholders...................................................... (22,912) (22,028) Proceeds from common stock offering..................................................... - 31,597 Proceeds from exercise of stock options................................................. 972 1,218 Proceeds from dividend reinvestment plan................................................ 160 183 Other................................................................................... (1,849) (376) ------------------------------------- NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES....................................... (9,323) 4,193 ------------------------------------- DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS..................................................... (389) (178) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD........................................ 1,915 1,208 ------------------------------------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD.............................................. $ 1,526 1,030 ===================================== SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized of $1,976 and $1,069 for 2006 and 2005, respectively....................................................... $ 12,518 11,413 Fair value of debt assumed by the Company in the purchase of real estate................ - 26,057 Common stock awards issued to employees and directors, net of forfeitures............... 3,284 1,007 </TABLE> See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) (1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying unaudited financial statements of EastGroup Properties, Inc. ("EastGroup" or "the Company") have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In management's opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the 2005 annual report on Form 10-K and the notes thereto. (2) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EastGroup Properties, Inc. (the Company or EastGroup), its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its investment in any joint ventures in which the Company has a controlling interest. At December 31, 2005, the Company had a controlling interest in one joint venture: the 80% owned University Business Center. At June 30, 2006, the Company had a controlling interest in two joint ventures: the 80% owned University Business Center and the 80% owned Castilian Research Center. The Company records 100% of the joint ventures' assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses with minority interests provided for in accordance with the joint venture agreements. The equity method of accounting is used for the Company's 50% undivided tenant-in-common interest in Industry Distribution Center II. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. (3) USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses during the reporting period, and to disclose material contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. (4) RECLASSIFICATIONS Certain reclassifications have been made in the 2005 financial statements to conform to the 2006 presentation. These amounts include reclassifications in the accompanying statements of cash flows. These reclassifications, which were $1,076,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005, resulted in a decrease in cash flows from operating activities and corresponding increases of $195,000 in investing activities and $881,000 in financing activities. These reclassifications were immaterial to the prior period presented. (5) REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES EastGroup has one reportable segment - industrial properties. These properties are primarily located in major Sunbelt regions of the United States, have similar economic characteristics and also meet the other criteria that permit the properties to be aggregated into one reportable segment. Geographically, the Company's investments are concentrated in major Sunbelt markets of the United States, primarily in the states of Florida, Texas, California and Arizona. The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Real estate properties held for investment are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value. Depreciation of buildings and other improvements, including personal property, is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of generally 40 years for buildings and 3 to 15 years for improvements and personal property. Building improvements are capitalized, while maintenance and repair expenses are charged to expense as incurred. Significant renovations and improvements that extend the useful life of or improve the assets are capitalized. Depreciation expense for continuing and discontinued operations
was $8,703,000 and $17,506,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively and $8,205,000 and $15,969,000 for the same periods in 2005. The Company's real estate properties at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 were as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> June 30, 2006 December 31, 2005 ------------------------------------- (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> Real estate properties: Land................................................ $ 152,284 152,954 Buildings and building improvements................. 654,082 656,897 Tenant and other improvements....................... 139,145 133,734 Development............................................ 89,360 77,483 ------------------------------------- 1,034,871 1,021,068 Less accumulated depreciation....................... (217,524) (206,427) ------------------------------------- $ 817,347 814,641 ===================================== </TABLE> (6) REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE Real estate properties that are held for sale are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell and are not depreciated while they are held for sale. In accordance with the guidelines established under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, the results of operations for the properties sold or held for sale during the reported periods are shown under Discontinued Operations on the consolidated income statements. No interest expense was allocated to the properties that are held for sale or whose operations are included under Discontinued Operations except for Lamar Distribution Center II, the mortgage of which was required to be paid in full upon the sale of the property in 2005. Accordingly, Discontinued Operations includes interest expense of $32,000 and $64,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. At December 31, 2005, the Company was offering for sale 6.4 acres of land in Houston with a carrying amount of $773,000. As a result of a change in plans by management, this land was transferred into the development portfolio during 2006. (7) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND ACQUIRED INTANGIBLES Upon acquisition of real estate properties, the Company applies the principles of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, to determine the allocation of the purchase price among the individual components of both the tangible and intangible assets based on their respective fair values. The Company determines whether any financing assumed is above or below market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar properties. The cost of the properties acquired may be adjusted based on indebtedness assumed from the seller that is determined to be above or below market rates. The allocation to tangible assets (land, building and improvements) is based upon management's determination of the value of the property as if it were vacant using discounted cash flow models. Factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. The remaining purchase price is allocated among three categories of intangible assets consisting of the above or below market component of in-place leases, the value of in-place leases and the value of customer relationships. The value allocable to the above or below market component of an acquired in-place lease is determined based upon the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the lease over its remaining term, and (ii) management's estimate of the amounts that would be paid using fair market rates over the remaining term of the lease. The amounts allocated to above and below market leases are included in Other Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets and are amortized to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The total amount of intangible assets is further allocated to in-place lease values and to customer relationship values based upon management's assessment of their respective values. These intangible assets are included in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets and are amortized over the remaining term of the existing lease, or the anticipated life of the customer relationship, as applicable. Amortization expense for in-place lease intangibles was $634,000 and $1,374,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively and $565,000 and $1,000,000 for the same periods in 2005. Amortization of above and below market leases was immaterial for all periods presented. The Company periodically reviews (at least annually) the recoverability of goodwill and (on a quarterly basis) the recoverability of other intangibles for possible impairment. In management's opinion, no material impairment of goodwill and other intangibles existed at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
(8) OTHER ASSETS A summary of the Company's Other Assets follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> June 30, 2006 December 31, 2005 ------------------------------------ (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> Leasing costs (principally commissions), net of accumulated amortization....... $ 14,507 13,630 Straight-line rent receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts.......... 13,320 12,773 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts.................... 2,561 2,930 Acquired in-place lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $3,738 and $3,580 for 2006 and 2005, respectively ........................ 4,688 6,062 Goodwill....................................................................... 990 990 Prepaid expenses and other assets.............................................. 9,287 7,206 ------------------------------------ $ 45,353 43,591 ==================================== </TABLE> (9) ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES A summary of the Company's Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> June 30, 2006 December 31, 2005 ------------------------------------ (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> Property taxes payable............................................ $ 8,002 8,224 Development costs payable......................................... 2,984 2,777 Dividends payable................................................. 3,045 2,363 Other payables and accrued expenses............................... 6,844 9,577 ------------------------------------ $ 20,875 22,941 ==================================== </TABLE> (10) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Comprehensive income is comprised of net income plus all other changes in equity from nonowner sources. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are presented in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 are summarized below. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, --------------------------------------------------- 2006 2005 2006 2005 --------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME: Balance at beginning of period.................................... $ 452 258 311 14 Change in fair value of interest rate swap.................... 94 (239) 235 5 --------------------------------------------------- Balance at end of period.......................................... $ 546 19 546 19 =================================================== </TABLE> (11) EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic earnings per share (EPS) represents the amount of earnings for the period available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period. The Company's basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS represents the amount of earnings for the period available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period and to each share that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares for all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the reporting period. The Company calculates diluted EPS by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of nonvested restricted stock and stock options had the options been exercised. The dilutive effect of stock options and their equivalents (such as nonvested restricted stock) was determined using the treasury stock method which assumes exercise of the options as of the beginning of the period or when issued, if later, and assumes proceeds from the exercise of options are used to
purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. Reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in the basic and diluted EPS computations is as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, --------------------------------------------------- 2006 2005 2006 2005 --------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> BASIC EPS COMPUTATION Numerator-net income available to common stockholders............ $ 4,920 5,232 10,425 10,112 Denominator-weighted average shares outstanding.................. 21,932 21,755 21,907 21,326 DILUTED EPS COMPUTATION Numerator-net income available to common stockholders............ $ 4,920 5,232 10,425 10,112 Denominator: Weighted average shares outstanding............................ 21,932 21,755 21,907 21,326 Common stock options........................................... 139 169 154 168 Nonvested restricted stock..................................... 166 149 161 144 --------------------------------------------------- Total Shares................................................ 22,237 22,073 22,222 21,638 =================================================== </TABLE> (12) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006. The new rule required that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements and that the cost be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The Company's adoption of SFAS 123R had an immaterial impact on its overall financial position and results of operations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the Company had, effective January 1, 2002, adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123, 'Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation'," prospectively to all awards granted, modified, or settled after January 1, 2002. MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN The Company has a management incentive plan which was approved by the shareholders and adopted in 2004 (the 2004 Plan), which authorizes the issuance of up to 1,900,000 shares of common stock to employees in the form of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock (limited to 570,000 shares), deferred stock units, performance shares, stock bonuses, and stock. Total shares available for grant were 1,747,674 at June 30, 2006. Typically, the Company issues new shares to fulfill stock grants or upon the exercise of stock options. Stock-based compensation expense was $518,000 and $1,116,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively, of which $190,000 and $350,000 were capitalized as part of the Company's development costs. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, stock-based compensation expense was $556,000 and $1,004,000, respectively, of which $98,000 and $195,000 were capitalized as part of the Company's development costs. Restricted Stock The purpose of the restricted stock plan is to act as a retention device since it allows participants to benefit from dividends on shares as well as potential stock appreciation. Vesting occurs from three to ten years from the date of the grant for nonperformance based grants. Restricted stock is granted to executives upon the satisfaction of annual and multi-year performance goals with vesting from three to four years. Under the modified prospective application method, the Company continues to recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period for awards that precede the adoption of SFAS 123R. The expense for performance-based awards after January 1, 2006 is determined using the graded vesting attribution method which recognizes each separate vesting portion of the award as a separate award on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. This method accelerates the expensing of the award compared to the straight-line method. Awards that only require service are expensed on a straight-line basis over the service period. The total compensation expense for service and performance based awards is based upon the fair market value of the shares on the grant date, adjusted for estimated forfeitures. During the restricted period, the Company accrues dividends and holds the certificates for the shares; however, the employee can vote the shares. Share certificates and dividends are delivered to the employee as they vest. As of June 30, 2006, there was $4,087,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock compensation that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.53 years.
Following is a summary of the total shares that will vest by year for the remainder of the vesting periods as of June 30, 2006. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Remaining Shares Vesting Schedule Number of Shares - --------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> Remainder of 2006......................... 63,538 2007...................................... 89,265 2008...................................... 74,312 2009...................................... 34,870 ---------------- Total Nonvested Shares.................... 261,985 ================ </TABLE> Following is a summary of the total restricted shares granted, issued, forfeited and delivered to employees with the related weighted average grant date fair value share prices for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Of the shares that vested in 2006, 571 shares were withheld by the Company to satisfy the tax obligations for those employees who elected this option as permitted under the applicable equity plan. The fair value of shares that were granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $494,000; there were no grants for the three months ended June 30, 2006 or for either period in 2005. As of the vesting date, the fair value of shares that vested during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $1,472,000 and $829,000, respectively; no shares vested for either three-month period ended June 30, 2006 or 2005. Restricted Stock Activity: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 June 30, 2006 ------------------------------------------------------- Weighted Weighted Average Average Shares Grant Date Shares Grant Date Fair Value Fair Value ------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Nonvested at beginning of period.... 261,985 $ 28.50 177,444 $ 23.01 Issued (1).......................... - - 107,823 37.25 Granted (2)......................... - - 10,511 47.01 Forfeited........................... - - (1,480) 22.04 Vested.............................. - - (32,313) 34.91 ----------- ----------- Nonvested at end of period.......... 261,985 28.50 261,985 28.50 =========== =========== </TABLE> (1) Issued shares are shares granted in prior years that were awarded during the period upon satisfaction of performance conditions. (2) During the quarter, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved a plan to issue shares contingent upon the attainment of certain performance goals. At June 30, 2006, the number of shares estimated to be awarded was 36,949 shares at a weighted average grant date fair value of $43.83 per share. Compensation expense related to this grant is included in stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. Employee Stock Options The Company has not granted stock options to employees since 2002. Outstanding employee stock options vested equally over a two-year period; accordingly, all options are now vested. The intrinsic value realized by employees from the exercise of options was $1,175,000 and $1,731,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively and $225,000 and $347,000 for the same periods in 2005. Following is a summary of the total employee stock options granted, forfeited, exercised and expired with related weighted average exercise share prices for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. Stock Option Activity: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 June 30, 2006 ------------------------------------------------------- Weighted Weighted Shares Average Shares Average Exercise Exercise Price Price ------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Outstanding at beginning of period... 231,155 $ 19.87 251,075 $ 19.80 Granted.............................. - - - - Forfeited............................ - - - - Exercised............................ (38,499) 14.58 (58,419) 16.08 Expired.............................. - - - - ------------ ----------- Outstanding at end of period......... 192,656 20.93 192,656 20.93 ============ =========== Exercisable at end of period......... 192,656 20.93 192,656 20.93 </TABLE> <TABLE> <CAPTION> Employee outstanding stock options at June 30, 2006, all exercisable: - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Weighted Average Remaining Weighted Average Intrinsic Exercise Price Range Number Contractual Life Exercise Price Value - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> $ 17.92-25.75 192,656 2.11 years $ 20.93 $4,908,000 </TABLE>
DIRECTORS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN The Company has a director equity incentive plan that was approved by shareholders and adopted in 2005 (the 2005 Plan), which authorizes the issuance of up to 50,000 shares of common stock through awards of shares and restricted shares granted to nonemployee directors of the Company. The 2005 Plan replaced prior plans under which directors were granted stock option awards. Outstanding grants under prior plans will be fulfilled under those plans. In 2005, 1,200 common shares of stock were issued to directors. In addition, 481 shares of restricted stock at $41.57 were granted, of which 120 shares were vested as of June 30, 2006. The restricted stock vests 25% per year for four years. As of June 30, 2006, there was $15,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock compensation that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.0 years. In 2006, 3,402 common shares of stock were issued to directors. There were 44,917 shares available for grant under the 2005 Plan at June 30, 2006. Stock-based compensation expense for directors was $13,000 and $27,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively and zero for the same periods in 2005. The intrinsic value realized by directors from the exercise of options was zero and $70,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively and $338,000 and $669,000 for the same periods in 2005. Following is a summary of the total director stock options granted, exercised and expired with related weighted average exercise share prices for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006. Stock Option Activity: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 June 30, 2006 ------------------------------------------------------- Weighted Weighted Shares Average Shares Average Exercise Exercise Price Price ------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Outstanding at beginning of period.... 51,500 $ 22.93 53,750 $ 22.58 Granted............................... - - - - Exercised............................. - - (2,250) 14.58 Expired............................... - - - - ------------ ------------- Outstanding at end of period.......... 51,500 22.93 51,500 22.93 ============ ============= Exercisable at end of period.......... 51,500 22.93 51,500 22.93 </TABLE> <TABLE> <CAPTION> Director outstanding stock options at June 30, 2006, all exercisable: - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Weighted Average Remaining Weighted Average Intrinsic Exercise Price Range Number Contractual Life Exercise Price Value - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> $ 19.375-26.60 51,500 4.62 years $ 22.93 $1,209,000 </TABLE> (13) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In July 2006, the Company signed an application on a $78 million, nonrecourse first mortgage loan secured by 17 properties. The loan is expected to close in mid-October 2006 and will have a fixed interest rate of 5.97%, a ten-year term and an amortization schedule of 20 years. The proceeds of the note will be used to repay a maturing $20.5 million mortgage and to reduce floating rate bank borrowings.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. OVERVIEW EastGroup's goal is to maximize shareholder value by being the leading provider in its markets of functional, flexible, and quality business distribution space for location sensitive tenants primarily in the 5,000 to 50,000 square foot range. The Company develops, acquires and operates distribution facilities, the majority of which are clustered around major transportation features in supply constrained submarkets in major Sunbelt regions. The Company's core markets are in the states of Florida, Texas, California and Arizona. The Company primarily generates revenue by leasing space at its real estate properties. As such, EastGroup's greatest challenge is leasing space at competitive market rates. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, leases on 2,183,000 square feet (10.2%) of EastGroup's total square footage of 21,339,000 expired, and the Company was successful in renewing or re-leasing 80% of that total. In addition, EastGroup leased 638,000 square feet of other vacant space during this period. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, average rental rates on new and renewal leases increased by 10.0%. EastGroup's total leased percentage increased to 94.8% at June 30, 2006 from 93.2% at June 30, 2005. Leases scheduled to expire for the remainder of 2006 were 4.8% of the portfolio on a square foot basis at June 30, 2006, and this figure was reduced to 3.6% as of August 7, 2006. Property net operating income from same properties increased 3.4% for both the quarter and the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005. The second quarter of 2006 was EastGroup's twelfth consecutive quarter of positive same property comparisons. The Company generates new sources of leasing revenue through its acquisition and development programs. There were no acquisitions of income producing properties during the first six months of 2006. EastGroup continues to see targeted development as a major contributor to the Company's growth. The Company mitigates risks associated with development through a Board-approved maximum level of land held for development and by adjusting development start dates according to leasing activity. During 2006, EastGroup acquired 17.7 acres of development land in Phoenix for $5,828,000. The Company expects to begin development of approximately 270,000 square feet in the Sky Harbor Commerce Center before the end of the year. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company transferred four properties (248,000 square feet) with aggregate costs of $17.5 million at the date of transfer from development to real estate properties. These properties are all 100% leased. The Company expects to transfer five additional properties to the portfolio during the last half of the year. The Company anticipates approximately $90 million in new development starts during 2006. The Company sold four properties in Memphis (a noncore market) and several parcels of land during the six months ended June 30, 2006 for a net sales price of $18.7 million, generating combined gains of $1.3 million, of which approximately $200,000 was deferred. These dispositions represented an opportunity to recycle capital into acquisitions and development with greater upside potential. The Company primarily funds its acquisition and development programs through a $175 million line of credit (as discussed in Liquidity and Capital Resources). As market conditions permit, EastGroup issues equity, including preferred equity, and/or employs fixed-rate, nonrecourse first mortgage debt to replace the short-term bank borrowings. In March 2006, the Company signed an application on a $38 million, nonrecourse first mortgage loan secured by properties containing 778,000 square feet. The loan is expected to close in August 2006 and will have a fixed interest rate of 5.68%, a ten-year term and an amortization schedule of 20 years. In July 2006, the Company signed an application on a $78 million, nonrecourse first mortgage loan secured by properties containing 1,316,000 square feet. The loan is expected to close in mid October 2006 and will have a fixed interest rate of 5.97%, a ten-year term and an amortization schedule of 20 years. The proceeds of these notes will be used to repay maturing mortgages of approximately $35.5 million and to reduce variable rate bank borrowings. Tower Automotive, Inc. (Tower) filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in early 2005. Tower, which leases 210,000 square feet from EastGroup under a lease expiring in December 2010, is current with their rental payments to EastGroup through August 2006. EastGroup is obligated under a recourse mortgage loan on the property for $10,195,000 as of June 30, 2006. Property net operating income for 2005 was $1,374,000 for the property occupied by Tower. Rental income due for 2006 is $1,389,000 with estimated property net operating income for 2006 of $1,366,000. Property net operating income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $687,000. EastGroup has one reportable segment - industrial properties. These properties are primarily located in major Sunbelt regions of the United States, have similar economic characteristics and also meet the other criteria that permit the properties to be aggregated into one reportable segment. The Company's chief decision makers use two primary measures of operating results in making decisions: property net operating income (PNOI), defined as income from real estate operations less property operating expenses (before interest expense and depreciation and amortization), and funds from operations available to common stockholders (FFO), defined as net income (loss) computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of depreciable real estate property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. The Company calculates FFO based on the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trust's (NAREIT's) definition. PNOI is a supplemental industry reporting measurement used to evaluate the performance of the Company's real estate investments. The Company believes that the exclusion of depreciation and amortization in the industry's calculation of PNOI
provides a supplemental indicator of the property's performance since real estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions. PNOI as calculated by the Company may not be comparable to similarly titled but differently calculated measures for other REITs. The major factors that influence PNOI are occupancy levels, acquisitions and sales, development properties that achieve stabilized operations, rental rate increases or decreases, and the recoverability of operating expenses. The Company's success depends largely upon its ability to lease space and to recover from tenants the operating costs associated with those leases. Real estate income is comprised of rental income, pass-through income and other real estate income including lease termination fees. Property operating expenses are comprised of property taxes, insurance, utilities, repair and maintenance expenses, management fees, other operating costs and bad debt expense. Generally, the Company's most significant operating expenses are property taxes and insurance. Tenant leases may be net leases in which the total operating expenses are recoverable, modified gross leases in which some of the operating expenses are recoverable, or gross leases in which no expenses are recoverable (gross leases represent only a small portion of the Company's total leases). Increases in property operating expenses are fully recoverable under net leases and recoverable to a high degree under modified gross leases. Modified gross leases often include base year amounts and expense increases over these amounts are recoverable. The Company's exposure to property operating expenses is primarily due to vacancies and leases for occupied space that limit the amount of expenses that can be recovered. The Company believes FFO is an appropriate measure of performance for equity real estate investment trusts. The Company believes that excluding depreciation and amortization in the calculation of FFO is appropriate since real estate values have historically increased or decreased based on market conditions. FFO is not considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of the Company's financial performance, nor is it a measure of the Company's liquidity or indicative of funds available to provide for the Company's cash needs, including its ability to make distributions. The Company's key drivers affecting FFO are changes in PNOI (as discussed above), interest rates, the amount of leverage the Company employs and general and administrative expense. The following table presents on a comparative basis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 reconciliations of PNOI and FFO Available to Common Stockholders to Net Income. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, ---------------------------------------------------- 2006 2005 2006 2005 ---------------------------------------------------- (In thousands, except per share data) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Income from real estate operations............................................ $ 33,187 30,464 65,808 59,882 Expenses from real estate operations.......................................... (9,287) (8,582) (18,321) (16,800) ---------------------------------------------------- PROPERTY NET OPERATING INCOME................................................. 23,900 21,882 47,487 43,082 Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment (before depreciation)......... 98 164 205 363 Income from discontinued operations (before depreciation and amotization)..... 63 468 341 1,107 Interest income............................................................... 21 85 43 209 Other income.................................................................. 15 100 34 170 Interest expense.............................................................. (6,397) (5,832) (12,732) (11,770) General and administrative expense............................................ (1,636) (1,795) (3,444) (3,693) Minority interest in earnings (before depreciation and amortization).......... (174) (149) (348) (313) Gain on sale of nondepreciable real estate investments........................ 6 - 655 - Dividends on Series D preferred shares........................................ (656) (656) (1,312) (1,312) ---------------------------------------------------- FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS........................ 15,240 14,267 30,929 27,843 Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations...................... (10,310) (9,540) (20,760) (18,370) Depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations.................... (25) (247) (182) (488) Depreciation from unconsolidated investment................................... (33) (37) (66) (74) Minority interest depreciation and amortization............................... 38 35 75 70 Gain on sale of depreciable real estate investments........................... 10 754 429 1,131 ---------------------------------------------------- NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS................................... 4,920 5,232 10,425 10,112 Dividends on preferred shares................................................. 656 656 1,312 1,312 ---------------------------------------------------- NET INCOME.................................................................... $ 5,576 5,888 11,737 11,424 ==================================================== Net income available to common stockholders per diluted share................. $ .22 .24 .47 .47 Funds from operations available to common stockholders per diluted share...... .69 .65 1.39 1.29 Diluted shares for earnings per share and funds from operations............... 22,237 22,073 22,222 21,638 </TABLE>
The Company analyzes the following performance trends in evaluating the progress of the Company: o The FFO change per share represents the increase or decrease in FFO per share from the same quarter in the current year compared to the prior year. FFO per share for the second quarter of 2006 was $.69 per share compared with $.65 per share for the same period of 2005, an increase of 6.2%. The increase in FFO was mainly due to a PNOI increase of $2,018,000, or 9.2%. The increase in PNOI was primarily attributable to $501,000 from 2005 acquisitions, $735,000 from newly developed properties and $736,000 from same property growth. The second quarter of 2006 was the eighth consecutive quarter of increased FFO as compared to the previous year's quarter. o Same property net operating income change represents the PNOI increase or decrease for operating properties owned during the entire current period and prior year reporting period. PNOI from same properties increased 3.4% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. The second quarter of 2006 was the twelfth consecutive quarter of improved same property operations. o Occupancy is the percentage of total leasable square footage for which the lease term has commenced as of the close of the reporting period. Occupancy at June 30, 2006 was 94.0%; occupancy has ranged from 91.0% to 94.3% for thirteen consecutive quarters. o Rental rate change represents the rental rate increase or decrease on new and renewal leases compared to the prior leases on the same space. Rental rate increases on new and renewal leases averaged 11.1% for the second quarter of 2006.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES The Company's management considers the following accounting policies and estimates to be critical to the reported operations of the Company. Real Estate Properties The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired properties to net tangible and identified intangible assets based on their respective fair values. The allocation to tangible assets (land, building and improvements) is based upon management's determination of the value of the property as if it were vacant using discounted cash flow models. Factors considered by management include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. The remaining purchase price is allocated among three categories of intangible assets consisting of the above or below market component of in-place leases, the value of in-place leases and the value of customer relationships. The value allocable to the above or below market component of an acquired in-place lease is determined based upon the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the lease over its remaining term, and (ii) management's estimate of the amounts that would be paid using fair market rates over the remaining term of the lease. The amounts allocated to above and below market leases are included in Other Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets and are amortized to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The total amount of intangible assets is further allocated to in-place lease values and to customer relationship values based upon management's assessment of their respective values. These intangible assets are included in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheets and are amortized over the remaining term of the existing lease, or the anticipated life of the customer relationship, as applicable. During the industrial development stage, costs associated with development (i.e., land, construction costs, interest expense during construction and lease-up, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs associated with development) are aggregated into the total capitalization of the property. Included in these costs are management's estimates for the portions of internal costs (primarily personnel costs) that are deemed directly or indirectly related to such development activities. The Company reviews its real estate investments for impairment of value whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If any real estate investment is considered permanently impaired, a loss is recorded to reduce the carrying value of the property to its estimated fair value. Real estate assets to be sold are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less selling costs. The evaluation of real estate investments involves many subjective assumptions dependent upon future economic events that affect the ultimate value of the property. Currently, the Company's management is not aware of any impairment issues nor has it experienced any significant impairment issues in recent years. In the event of impairment, the property's basis would be reduced and the impairment would be recognized as a current period charge in the income statement. Valuation of Receivables The Company is subject to tenant defaults and bankruptcies that could affect the collection of outstanding receivables. In order to mitigate these risks, the Company performs credit reviews and analyses on prospective tenants before significant leases are executed. On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates outstanding receivables and estimates the allowance for doubtful accounts. Management specifically analyzes aged receivables, customer credit-worthiness, historical bad debts and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company believes that its allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate for its outstanding receivables for the periods presented. In the event that the allowance for doubtful accounts is insufficient for an account that is subsequently written off, additional bad debt expense would be recognized as a current period charge in the income statement. Tax Status EastGroup, a Maryland corporation, has qualified as a real estate investment trust under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code and intends to continue to qualify as such. To maintain its status as a REIT, the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income to its stockholders. The Company has the option of (i) reinvesting the sales price of properties sold through tax-deferred exchanges, allowing for a deferral of capital gains on the sale, (ii) paying out capital gains to the stockholders with no tax to the Company, or (iii) treating the capital gains as having been distributed to the stockholders, paying the tax on the gain deemed distributed and allocating the tax paid as a credit to the stockholders. The Company distributed all of its 2005 taxable income to its stockholders and expects to distribute all of its taxable income in 2006. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes was necessary in 2005, nor is it expected to be necessary for 2006.
FINANCIAL CONDITION EastGroup's assets were $866,852,000 at June 30, 2006, an increase of $3,314,000 from December 31, 2005. Liabilities increased $12,231,000 to $509,203,000 and stockholders' equity decreased $9,277,000 to $355,587,000 during the same period. The paragraphs that follow explain these changes in detail. ASSETS Real Estate Properties Real estate properties increased $1,926,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2006 primarily due to the transfer of four properties from development with total costs of $17,543,000, as detailed below. These increases were offset by the transfer of four properties with a carrying amount of $23,281,000 to real estate held for sale, which were subsequently sold. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Real Estate Properties Transferred from Date Cost at Development in 2006 Location Size Transferred Transfer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Square feet) (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Southridge V............................ Orlando, FL 70,000 01-01-06 $ 4,458 Executive Airport CC II................. Fort Lauderdale, FL 55,000 02-01-06 4,522 Palm River South II..................... Tampa, FL 82,000 03-31-06 4,897 Southridge I............................ Orlando, FL 41,000 04-01-06 3,666 ------------- --------------- Total Developments Transferred.... 248,000 $ 17,543 ============= =============== </TABLE> The Company made capital improvements of $6,073,000 on existing and acquired properties (included in the Capital Expenditures table under Results of Operations). Also, the Company incurred costs of $1,745,000 on development properties that had transferred to real estate properties; the Company records these expenditures as development costs during the 12-month period following transfer. Development The investment in development at June 30, 2006 was $89,360,000 compared to $77,483,000 at December 31, 2005. Total capital invested for development in the first six months of 2006 was $30,392,000. In addition to the costs of $28,647,000 incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as detailed in the development activity table, the Company incurred costs of $1,745,000 on developments during the 12-month period following transfer to real estate properties. During 2006, EastGroup acquired 17.7 acres of development land in Phoenix for $5,828,000 which is included in the development activity table below under Prospective Development. The Company expects to begin development of approximately 270,000 square feet in the Sky Harbor Commerce Center before the end of the year. In the fourth quarter of 2005, 55 Castilian, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of EastGroup, acquired Castilian Research Center in Goleta (Santa Barbara), California for $4,129,000. As originally contemplated, during the second quarter of 2006, 55 Castilian sold (at cost) a 20% ownership interest to an entity controlled by its co-developer partner who is also a 20% co-owner of the Company's University Business Center complex in the same submarket. The partner contributed $350,000 and EastGroup contributed $1,400,000 as capital to 55 Castilian. EastGroup will loan 55 Castilian the remaining acquisition and construction funds. Castilian, which contains 35,000 square feet and is currently vacant, is being redeveloped into a state-of-the-art incubator R&D facility with a projected additional investment of approximately $3.2 million for a total investment of over $7 million. The Company transferred four developments (all 100% leased at the date of transfer) to real estate properties during the first six months of 2006 with a total investment of $17,543,000 as of the date of transfer. The Company transferred into development two parcels of land formerly held for sale with costs of $773,000. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Costs Incurred ----------------------------------------------- Costs For the Cumulative Estimated Transferred Six Months as of Total DEVELOPMENT Size in 2006(1) Ended 6/30/06 6/30/06 Costs(2) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Square feet) (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> LEASE-UP Sunport Center VI, Orlando, FL................... 63,000 $ - 466 3,800 4,200 Techway SW III, Houston, TX...................... 100,000 - 160 4,556 5,700 World Houston 15, Houston, TX.................... 63,000 - 1,530 3,957 5,800 World Houston 21, Houston, TX.................... 68,000 - 933 3,025 3,800 Southridge IV, Orlando, FL....................... 70,000 - 1,165 4,595 4,900 Santan 10 II, Chandler, AZ....................... 85,000 - 2,015 4,888 5,600 Arion 14, San Antonio, TX........................ 66,000 - 1,538 3,189 3,700 Arion 17, San Antonio, TX........................ 40,000 - 1,294 2,622 3,500 Oak Creek III, Tampa, FL........................ 61,000 - 2,416 3,358 3,900 Southridge II, Orlando, FL....................... 41,000 - 1,347 2,803 4,700 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Lease-up..................................... 657,000 - 12,864 36,793 45,800 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- </TABLE>
<TABLE> <CAPTION> Costs Incurred ----------------------------------------------- Costs For the Cumulative Estimated Transferred Six Months as of Total DEVELOPMENT Size in 2006(1) Ended 6/30/06 6/30/06 Costs(2) - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Square feet) (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> UNDER CONSTRUCTION Castilian Research Center, Santa Barbara, CA..... 35,000 - 379 4,570 7,300 Oak Creek V, Tampa, FL.......................... 100,000 1,389 783 2,172 6,400 Southridge VI, Orlando, FL....................... 81,000 2,580 1,152 3,732 5,700 Beltway Crossing II, III & IV, Houston, TX....... 160,000 2,388 - 2,388 8,900 Southridge III, Orlando, FL...................... 81,000 1,532 - 1,532 5,900 World Houston 23, Houston, TX.................... 125,000 1,274 - 1,274 8,400 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Under Construction........................... 582,000 9,163 2,314 15,668 42,600 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT (PRIMARILY LAND) Phoenix, AZ...................................... 400,000 - 6,119 7,280 31,300 Tucson, AZ....................................... 70,000 - - 326 3,500 Tampa, FL........................................ 364,000 (1,389) 1,254 4,736 18,900 Orlando, FL...................................... 652,000 (4,112) 2,646 7,119 47,500 West Palm Beach, FL.............................. 20,000 - 68 622 2,300 Fort Myers, FL................................... 126,000 - 216 2,297 10,900 El Paso, TX...................................... 251,000 - - 2,444 9,600 Houston, TX...................................... 1,098,000 (2,889) 1,553 10,178 59,100 San Antonio, TX.................................. 65,000 - 192 1,192 5,200 Jackson, MS...................................... 28,000 - - 705 2,000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Prospective Development...................... 3,074,000 (8,390) 12,048 36,899 190,300 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4,313,000 $ 773 27,226 89,360 278,700 ============================================================================= DEVELOPMENTS COMPLETED AND TRANSFERRED TO REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES DURING THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 Southridge V, Orlando, FL........................ 70,000 $ - (214) 4,458 Executive Airport CC II, Fort Lauderdale, FL..... 55,000 - 38 4,522 Palm River South II, Tampa, FL................... 82,000 - 862 4,897 Southridge I, Orlando, FL........................ 41,000 - 735 3,666 ------------------------------------------------------------- Total Transferred to Real Estate Properties........ 248,000 $ - 1,421 17,543 (3) ============================================================= </TABLE> (1) Represents costs transferred from Prospective Development (principally land) to Under Construction during the year and $773,000 that was transferred from the category "held for sale." (2) The information provided above includes forward-looking data based on current construction schedules, the status of lease negotiations with potential tenants and other relevant factors currently available to the Company. There can be no assurance that any of these factors will not change or that any change will not affect the accuracy of such forward-looking data. Among the factors that could affect the accuracy of the forward-looking statements are weather or other natural occurrence, default or other failure of performance by contractors, increases in the price of construction materials or the unavailability of such materials, failure to obtain necessary permits or approvals from government entities, changes in local and/or national economic conditions, increased competition for tenants or other occurrences that could depress rental rates, and other factors not within the control of the Company. (3) Represents cumulative costs at the date of transfer. Accumulated depreciation on real estate properties increased $11,097,000 primarily due to depreciation expense of $17,506,000 on real estate properties, offset by accumulated depreciation of $6,340,000 on four properties transferred to real estate held for sale in 2006 as discussed below. Real estate held for sale, consisting of two parcels of land in Houston, Texas, was $773,000 at December 31, 2005. As a result of a change in plans by management, this land was transferred into the development portfolio during 2006. Four Memphis properties, Senator 1, Senator 2, Southeast Crossing and Lamar 1, were transferred to real estate held for sale in the first six months of 2006 and were subsequently sold during the same period. The sale of these properties continues to reflect the Company's plan of reducing ownership in Memphis, a noncore market, as market conditions permit. See Results of Operations for a summary of the gains on the sale of these properties. A summary of the changes in Other Assets is presented in Note 8 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
LIABILITIES Mortgage notes payable decreased $4,622,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily due to regularly scheduled principal payments of $4,359,000 and mortgage loan premium amortization of $215,000. Notes payable to banks increased $18,784,000 as a result of advances of $80,856,000 exceeding repayments of $62,072,000. The Company's credit facilities are described in greater detail under Liquidity and Capital Resources. See Note 9 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of changes in Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Distributions in excess of earnings increased $11,857,000 as a result of dividends on common and preferred stock of $23,594,000 exceeding net income for financial reporting purposes of $11,737,000. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Comments are for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.) Net income available to common stockholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $4,920,000 ($.22 per basic and diluted share) and $10,425,000 ($.48 per basic and $.47 per diluted share) compared to $5,232,000 ($.24 per basic and diluted share) and $10,112,000 ($.47 per basic and diluted share) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. Diluted EPS for the second quarter of 2005 included a $.03 per share gain on the sale of real estate properties. PNOI increased by $2,018,000, or 9.2%, due to increased average occupancy and new acquisitions and developments. The Company's percentage leased and occupied were 94.8% and 94.0%, respectively, at June 30, 2006 compared to 93.2% and 91.8% at June 30, 2005. The increase in PNOI was primarily attributable to $501,000 from 2005 acquisitions, $735,000 from newly developed properties and $736,000 from same property growth. The following table presents the components of interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, ------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Increase 2006 2005 (Decrease) 2006 2005 (Decrease) ------------------------------------------------------------------ (In thousands, except rates of interest) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Average bank borrowings........................................ $ 123,218 87,922 35,296 121,032 96,087 24,945 Weighted average variable interest rates....................... 6.07% 4.33% 5.85% 4.09% VARIABLE RATE INTEREST EXPENSE Variable rate interest (excluding loan cost amortization)...... $ 1,866 949 917 3,509 1,947 1,562 Amortization of bank loan costs................................ 89 89 - 178 178 - ------------------------------------------------------------------ Total variable rate interest expense........................... 1,955 1,038 917 3,687 2,125 1,562 ------------------------------------------------------------------ FIXED RATE INTEREST EXPENSE (1) Fixed rate interest (excluding loan cost amortization)......... 5,381 5,249 132 10,793 10,489 304 Amortization of mortgage loan costs............................ 118 113 5 228 225 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Total fixed rate interest expense.............................. 5,499 5,362 137 11,021 10,714 307 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Total interest................................................. 7,454 6,400 1,054 14,708 12,839 1,869 Less capitalized interest...................................... (1,057) (568) (489) (1,976) (1,069) (907) ------------------------------------------------------------------ TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE......................................... $ 6,397 5,832 565 12,732 11,770 962 ================================================================== </TABLE> (1) Does not include interest expense of $32,000 and $64,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 for Lamar II which was sold in 2005 and the operations of which are included in discontinued operations for the same periods. The mortgage for this property was required to be repaid in full upon the sale of the property. Interest costs incurred during the period of construction of real estate properties are capitalized and offset against interest expense. Higher bank borrowings were attributable to increased acquisition and development activity during 2005 and 2006. The Company's weighted average variable interest rates for the second quarter of 2006 were significantly higher than in the same period of 2005 due to increases in short-term rates. Mortgage interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 showed a small increase from the same period of 2005. Increases are primarily due to the new mortgages and assumed mortgages on acquired properties in 2005 detailed in the table below. The Company recorded premiums totaling $1,282,000 to adjust the mortgage loans assumed to fair market value.
These premiums are being amortized over the lives of the assumed mortgages and reduce the contractual interest expense on these loans. The interest rates and amounts shown below for the assumed mortgages represent the fair market rates and values, respectively, at the dates of assumption. <TABLE> <CAPTION> NEW AND ASSUMED MORTGAGES IN 2005 INTEREST RATE DATE AMOUNT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> Arion Business Park (assumed)................................ 4.450% 01/21/05 $21,060,000 Interstate Distribution Center - Jacksonville (assumed)...... 5.640% 03/31/05 4,997,000 Chamberlain, Lake Pointe, Techway Southwest II and World Houston 19 & 20................................. 4.980% 11/30/05 39,000,000 Oak Creek Distribution Center IV (assumed)................... 5.680% 12/07/05 4,443,000 ------------- ---------------- Weighted Average/Total Amount.............................. 4.910% $69,500,000 ============= ================ </TABLE> These increases were offset by regularly scheduled principal payments and the repayment of five mortgages totaling $18,435,000 during 2005 as shown in the table below. <TABLE> <CAPTION> MORTGAGE LOANS REPAID IN 2005 INTEREST RATE DATE REPAID PAYOFF AMOUNT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> Westport Commerce Center............................ 8.000% 03/31/05 $ 2,371,000 Lamar Distribution Center II........................ 6.900% 06/30/05 1,781,000 Exchange Distribution Center I...................... 8.375% 07/01/05 1,762,000 Lake Pointe Business Park........................... 8.125% 07/01/05 9,738,000 JetPort Commerce Park............................... 8.125% 09/30/05 2,783,000 ------------- -------------- Weighted Average/Total Amount..................... 8.014% $18,435,000 ============= ============== </TABLE> Depreciation and amortization for continuing operations increased $770,000 and $2,390,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same periods in 2005. This increase was primarily due to properties acquired in 2005 and properties transferred from development during 2005 and 2006. NAREIT has recommended supplemental disclosures concerning straight-line rent, capital expenditures and leasing costs. Straight-lining of rent for continuing operations increased income by $353,000 and $717,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $583,000 and $1,070,000 in the same periods in 2005. Capital Expenditures Capital expenditures for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, Estimated ---------------------------------------------------- Useful Life 2006 2005 2006 2005 -------------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Upgrade on Acquisitions................... 40 yrs $ 45 37 108 54 Tenant Improvements: New Tenants............................ Lease Life 1,842 1,278 3,861 2,121 New Tenants (first generation) (1)..... Lease Life 128 162 280 410 Renewal Tenants........................ Lease Life 244 498 393 633 Other: Building Improvements.................. 5-40 yrs 341 509 856 764 Roofs.................................. 5-15 yrs 353 113 487 127 Parking Lots........................... 3-5 yrs 32 647 95 801 Other.................................. 5 yrs 15 141 45 167 ---------------------------------------------------- Total capital expenditures.......... $ 3,000 3,385 6,125 5,077 ==================================================== </TABLE> (1) First generation refers to space that has never been occupied under EastGroup's ownership.
Capitalized Leasing Costs The Company's leasing costs (principally commissions) are capitalized and included in Other Assets. The costs are amortized over the terms of the associated leases and are included in depreciation and amortization expense. Capitalized leasing costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, Estimated ---------------------------------------------------- Useful Life 2006 2005 2006 2005 -------------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Development.............................. Lease Life $ 524 448 759 800 New Tenants.............................. Lease Life 678 612 1,370 954 New Tenants (first generation) (1)....... Lease Life 35 - 75 49 Renewal Tenants.......................... Lease Life 447 449 942 814 ---------------------------------------------------- Total capitalized leasing costs.... $ 1,684 1,509 3,146 2,617 ==================================================== Amortization of leasing costs (2)........ $ 998 1,017 2,062 1,889 ==================================================== </TABLE> (1) First generation refers to space that has never been occupied under EastGroup's ownership. (2) Includes discontinued operations. Discontinued Operations The results of operations, including interest expense (if applicable), for the properties sold or held for sale during the periods reported are shown under Discontinued Operations on the consolidated income statements. The following tables present the components of revenue and expense for the properties sold during the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, --------------------------------------------------- Discontinued Operations 2006 2005 2006 2005 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Income from real estate operations.................... $ 97 730 587 1,656 Operating expenses from real estate operations........ (34) (230) (246) (485) Interest expense...................................... - (32) - (64) Depreciation and amortization......................... (25) (247) (182) (488) --------------------------------------------------- Income from real estate operations.................... 38 221 159 619 Gain on sale of real estate investments........... 16 754 1,084 1,131 --------------------------------------------------- Income from discontinued operations................... $ 54 975 1,243 1,750 =================================================== </TABLE> A summary of gains on sale of real estate investments for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Date Net Deferred Recognized Real Estate Properties Location Size Sold Sales Price Basis Gain Gain - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> 2006 Madisonville land.................... Madisonville, KY 1.2 Acres 01/05/06 $ 804 27 175 602 Senator I & II/Southeast Crossing.... Memphis, TN 534,000 SF 03/09/06 14,870 14,466 - 404 Dallas land.......................... Dallas, TX 0.1 Acre 03/16/06 66 13 - 53 Lamar Distribution Center I.......... Memphis, TN 125,000 SF 06/30/06 2,979 2,951 18 10 Deferred gain recognized from previous sale.................... 15 -------------------------------------------- $ 18,719 17,457 193 1,084 ============================================ 2005 Delp Distribution Center II.......... Memphis, TN 102,000 SF 02/23/05 $ 2,085 1,708 - 377 Lamar Distribution Center II......... Memphis, TN 151,000 SF 06/30/05 3,710 2,956 - 754 -------------------------------------------- $ 5,795 4,664 - 1,131 ============================================ </TABLE>
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006. The new rule required that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements and that the cost be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The Company's adoption of SFAS 123R had an immaterial impact on its overall financial position and results of operations. See Note 12 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information related to the Company's accounting for stock-based compensation. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Net cash provided by operating activities was $29,722,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The primary other sources of cash were from bank borrowings and the sale of real estate properties. The Company distributed $21,600,000 in common and $1,312,000 in preferred stock dividends during the six months ended June 30, 2006. Other primary uses of cash were for bank debt repayments, construction and development of properties, capital improvements at various properties and mortgage note payments. Total debt at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 is detailed below. The Company's bank credit facilities have certain restrictive covenants, and the Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005. <TABLE> <CAPTION> June 30, 2006 December 31, 2005 ------------------------------------ (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> Mortgage notes payable - fixed rate......... $ 342,339 346,961 Bank notes payable - floating rate.......... 135,548 116,764 ------------------------------------ Total debt............................... $ 477,887 463,725 ==================================== </TABLE> The Company has a three-year, $175 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a group of nine banks that matures in January 2008. The Company customarily uses this line of credit for acquisitions and developments. The interest rate on the facility is based on the LIBOR index and varies according to debt-to-total asset value ratios, with an annual facility fee of 20 basis points. EastGroup's interest rate under this facility is LIBOR plus 95 basis points; except that it may be lower based upon the competitive bid option in the note (the Company was first eligible under this facility to exercise its option to solicit competitive bid offers in June 2005). The line of credit can be expanded by $100 million and has a one-year extension at EastGroup's option. At June 30, 2006, the weighted average interest rate was 6.15% on a balance of $132,700,000. The interest rate on each tranche is currently reset on a monthly basis. At August 7, 2006, the balance on this line was comprised of an $84 million tranche at 6.35% and $43.7 million in competitive bid loans at a weighted average rate of 5.88%. The Company has a one-year $20 million unsecured revolving credit facility with PNC Bank, N.A. that matures in November 2006. This credit facility is customarily used for working cash needs. The interest rate on the facility is based on LIBOR and varies according to debt-to-total asset value ratios; it is currently LIBOR plus 110 basis points. At June 30, 2006, the interest rate was 6.43% on $2,848,000. As market conditions permit, EastGroup issues equity, including preferred equity, and/or employs fixed-rate, nonrecourse first mortgage debt to replace the short-term bank borrowings. In March 2006, the Company signed an application on a $38 million, nonrecourse first mortgage loan secured by two properties. The loan is expected to close in August 2006 and will have a fixed interest rate of 5.68%, a ten-year term and an amortization schedule of 20 years. In July 2006, the Company signed an application on a $78 million, nonrecourse first mortgage loan secured by 17 properties. The loan is expected to close in mid October 2006 and will have a fixed interest rate of 5.97%, a ten-year term and an amortization schedule of 20 years. The proceeds of these notes will be used to repay maturing mortgages of approximately $35.5 million and to reduce variable rate bank borrowings. Contractual Obligations EastGroup's fixed, noncancelable obligations as of December 31, 2005 did not materially change during the six months ended June 30, 2006 except for the increase in bank borrowings discussed above. The Company anticipates that its current cash balance, operating cash flows, and borrowings under its lines of credit will be adequate for (i) operating and administrative expenses, (ii) normal repair and maintenance expenses at its properties, (iii) debt service obligations, (iv) distributions to stockholders, (v) capital improvements, (vi) purchases of properties, (vii) development, and (viii) any other normal business activities of the Company, both in the short- and long-term. INFLATION Most of the Company's leases include scheduled rent increases. Additionally, most of the Company's leases require the tenants to pay their pro rata share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes and insurance, thereby reducing the Company's exposure to increases in operating expenses resulting from inflation. In addition, the
Company's leases typically have three to five year terms, which may enable the Company to replace existing leases with new leases at a higher base if rents on the existing leases are below the then-existing market rate. Interest rates are rising, thereby increasing the costs the Company pays on bank borrowings and potential new mortgages. Development costs, including the costs of construction and construction materials, are increasing. The Company has been able to increase rental rates in all of its development markets to achieve acceptable yields on investments. ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. The Company is exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of its lines of credit and long-term debt maturities. This debt is used to maintain liquidity and fund capital expenditures and expansion of the Company's real estate investment portfolio and operations. The Company's objective for interest rate risk management is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives, the Company borrows at fixed rates but also has several variable rate bank lines as discussed under Liquidity and Capital Resources. The table below presents the principal payments due and weighted average interest rates for both the fixed rate and variable rate debt. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Jul-Dec 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Thereafter Total Fair Value ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Fixed rate debt(1) (in thousands)... $ 40,463 23,398 9,609 39,596 7,904 221,369 342,339 342,568(2) Weighted average interest rate...... 6.02% 7.36% 6.40% 6.69% 6.11% 6.18% 6.31% Variable rate debt (in thousands)... $ 2,848 - 132,700 - - - 135,548 135,548 Weighted average interest rate...... 6.43% - 6.15% - - - 6.15% </TABLE> (1) The fixed rate debt shown above includes the Tower Automotive mortgage, which has a variable interest rate based on the one-month LIBOR. EastGroup has an interest rate swap agreement that fixes the rate at 4.03% for the 8-year term. Interest and related fees result in an annual effective interest rate of 5.3%. (2) The fair value of the Company's fixed rate debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for similar issues or by discounting expected cash flows at the rates currently offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities, as advised by the Company's bankers. As the table above incorporates only those exposures that existed as of June 30, 2006, it does not consider those exposures or positions that could arise after that date. The ultimate impact of interest rate fluctuations on the Company will depend on the exposures that arise during the period and interest rates. If the weighted average interest rate on the variable rate bank debt as shown above changes by 10% or approximately 62 basis points, interest expense and cash flows would increase or decrease by approximately $834,000 annually. The Company has an interest rate swap agreement to hedge its exposure to the variable interest rate on the Company's $10,195,000 Tower Automotive Center recourse mortgage, which is summarized in the table below. Under the swap agreement, the Company effectively pays a fixed rate of interest over the term of the agreement without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. This swap is designated as a cash flow hedge and is considered to be fully effective in hedging the variable rate risk associated with the Tower mortgage loan. Changes in the fair value of the swap are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company does not hold or issue this type of derivative contract for trading or speculative purposes. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Current Maturity Fair Value Fair Value Type of Hedge Notional Amount Date Reference Rate Fixed Rate at 6/30/06 at 12/31/05 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (In thousands) (In thousands) <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Swap $10,195 12/31/10 1 month LIBOR 4.03% $546 $311 </TABLE> FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS In addition to historical information, certain sections of this report contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, such as those pertaining to the Company's hopes, expectations, anticipations, intentions, beliefs, budgets, strategies regarding the future, the anticipated performance of development and acquisition properties, capital resources, profitability and portfolio performance. Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties. The following factors, among others discussed herein, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements: defaults or nonrenewal of leases, increased interest rates and operating costs, failure to obtain necessary outside financing, difficulties in identifying properties to acquire and in effecting acquisitions, failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, environmental uncertainties, risks related to disasters and the costs of insurance to protect from such disasters, financial market fluctuations, changes in real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates. The success of the Company also depends upon the trends of the economy, including interest rates and the effects to the economy from possible terrorism and related world events, income tax laws, governmental regulation, legislation, population changes and those risk factors discussed elsewhere in this Form. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect management's analysis only as the date hereof. The Company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements.
See also the Company's reports to be filed from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. (i) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2006, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company's periodic SEC filings. (ii) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting during the Company's second fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in EastGroup's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. On May 31, 2006, the Registrant held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders. At the Annual Meeting, D. Pike Aloian, H.C. Bailey, Jr., Hayden C. Eaves III, Fredric H. Gould, David H. Hoster II, Mary E. McCormick, David M. Osnos and Leland R. Speed were elected directors of the Registrant, each to serve until the 2007 Annual Meeting. The following is a summary of the voting for directors: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Common Stock Nominee Vote For Vote Withheld ------------------------------------------------------------ <S> <C> <C> D. Pike Aloian 20,701,969 183,662 H.C. Bailey, Jr. 20,473,146 412,485 Hayden C. Eaves III 20,815,204 70,427 Fredric H. Gould 20,785,415 100,216 David H. Hoster II 20,768,017 117,614 Mary E. McCormick 20,736,021 149,610 David M. Osnos 20,114,933 770,698 Leland R. Speed 20,752,974 132,657 </TABLE> ITEM 6. EXHIBITS. (a) Form 10-Q Exhibits: (31) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications (pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) (a) David H. Hoster II, Chief Executive Officer (b) N. Keith McKey, Chief Financial Officer (32) Section 1350 Certifications (pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) (a) David H. Hoster II, Chief Executive Officer (b) N. Keith McKey, Chief Financial Officer
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. Date: August 8, 2006 EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC. By: /s/ BRUCE CORKERN ------------------------------ Bruce Corkern, CPA Senior Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer By: /s/ N. KEITH MCKEY ------------------------------ N. Keith McKey, CPA Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer