EastGroup Properties
EGP
#2035
Rank
$10.13 B
Marketcap
$189.91
Share price
-1.17%
Change (1 day)
7.96%
Change (1 year)

EastGroup Properties - 10-Q quarterly report FY


Text size:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-07094

EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

MARYLAND 13-2711135
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of incorporation or organization) Identification No.)

300 ONE JACKSON PLACE
188 EAST CAPITOL STREET
JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39201
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Registrant's telephone number: (601) 354-3555


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES (x) NO ( )

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one)

Large Accelerated Filer (x) Accelerated Filer ( ) Non-accelerated Filer ( )

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ( ) NO (x)

The number of shares of common stock, $.0001 par value, outstanding as of
November 6, 2007 was 23,811,973.
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Pages
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
<S> <C> <C>
Item 1. Financial Statements

Consolidated balance sheets, September 30, 2007 (unaudited)
and December 31, 2006 3

Consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited) 4

Consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007 (unaudited) 5

Consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (unaudited) 6

Notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited) 7

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations 13

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 24

Item 4. Controls and Procedures 25

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors 25

Item 6. Exhibits 25

SIGNATURES

Authorized signatures 25
</TABLE>
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
September 30, 2007 December 31, 2006
-----------------------------------------------
(Unaudited)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Real estate properties.................................................... $ 1,078,840 973,910
Development............................................................... 144,302 114,986
-----------------------------------------------
1,223,142 1,088,896
Less accumulated depreciation......................................... (259,297) (231,106)
-----------------------------------------------
963,845 857,790

Real estate held for sale................................................. 2,372 -
Unconsolidated investment................................................. 2,559 2,595
Cash...................................................................... 1,155 940
Other assets.............................................................. 48,886 50,462
-----------------------------------------------
TOTAL ASSETS.......................................................... $ 1,018,817 911,787
===============================================

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

LIABILITIES
Mortgage notes payable.................................................... $ 468,908 417,440
Notes payable to banks.................................................... 94,652 29,066
Accounts payable & accrued expenses....................................... 36,717 32,589
Other liabilities......................................................... 11,386 11,747
-----------------------------------------------
611,663 490,842
-----------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------
Minority interest in joint ventures......................................... 2,263 2,148
-----------------------------------------------

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Series C Preferred Shares; $.0001 par value; 600,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued........................................................ - -
Series D 7.95% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares and additional
paid-in capital; $.0001 par value; 1,320,000 shares authorized and
issued; stated liquidation preference of $33,000........................ 32,326 32,326
Common shares; $.0001 par value; 68,080,000 shares authorized;
23,807,123 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 and
23,701,275 at December 31, 2006......................................... 2 2
Excess shares; $.0001 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized;
no shares issued........................................................ - -
Additional paid-in capital on common shares............................... 466,602 463,170
Distributions in excess of earnings....................................... (94,185) (77,015)
Accumulated other comprehensive income.................................... 146 314
-----------------------------------------------
404,891 418,797
-----------------------------------------------

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY............................ $ 1,018,817 911,787
===============================================
</TABLE>
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
----------------------------------------------------
2007 2006 2007 2006
----------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
REVENUES
Income from real estate operations................................... $ 39,153 33,674 112,192 98,554
Other income......................................................... 20 221 65 255
----------------------------------------------------
39,173 33,895 112,257 98,809
----------------------------------------------------
EXPENSES
Expenses from real estate operations................................. 10,490 9,438 30,759 27,542
Depreciation and amortization........................................ 12,200 10,396 35,312 30,827
General and administrative........................................... 1,993 1,990 5,868 5,434
----------------------------------------------------
24,683 21,824 71,939 63,803
----------------------------------------------------

OPERATING INCOME....................................................... 14,490 12,071 40,318 35,006

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment...................... 65 74 214 213
Interest income...................................................... 38 68 94 111
Interest expense..................................................... (7,086) (6,314) (20,162) (19,046)
Minority interest in joint ventures.................................. (133) (179) (441) (452)
----------------------------------------------------
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS...................................... 7,374 5,720 20,023 15,832
----------------------------------------------------

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Income from real estate operations................................... 31 193 87 734
Gain on sale of real estate investments.............................. 309 7 323 1,091
----------------------------------------------------
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS.................................... 340 200 410 1,825
----------------------------------------------------

NET INCOME............................................................. 7,714 5,920 20,433 17,657

Preferred dividends-Series D......................................... 656 656 1,968 1,968
----------------------------------------------------

NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS............................ $ 7,058 5,264 18,465 15,689
====================================================

BASIC PER COMMON SHARE DATA
Income from continuing operations.................................... $ .29 .23 .76 .63
Income from discontinued operations.................................. .01 .01 .02 .08
----------------------------------------------------
Net income available to common stockholders.......................... $ .30 .24 .78 .71
====================================================

Weighted average shares outstanding.................................. 23,562 22,235 23,548 22,017
====================================================

DILUTED PER COMMON SHARE DATA
Income from continuing operations.................................... $ .29 .22 .76 .62
Income from discontinued operations.................................. .01 .01 .02 .08
----------------------------------------------------
Net income available to common stockholders.......................... $ .30 .23 .78 .70
====================================================

Weighted average shares outstanding.................................. 23,778 22,553 23,767 22,334
====================================================

Dividends declared per common share.................................... $ .50 .49 1.50 1.47
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES
IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
(UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Accumulated
Additional Distributions Other
Preferred Common Paid-In In Excess Comprehensive
Stock Stock Capital Of Earnings Income Total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE, DECEMBER 31, 2006...................... $ 32,326 2 463,170 (77,015) 314 418,797
Comprehensive income
Net income.................................... - - - 20,433 - 20,433
Net unrealized change in fair value of
interest rate swap.......................... - - - - (168) (168)
----------
Total comprehensive income............... 20,265
----------
Common dividends declared - $1.50 per share.... - - - (35,635) - (35,635)
Preferred stock dividends declared - $1.4907
per share.................................... - - - (1,968) - (1,968)
Stock-based compensation, net of forfeitures... - - 2,195 - - 2,195
Issuance of 61,950 shares of common stock,
options exercised............................ - - 1,365 - - 1,365
Issuance of 4,616 shares of common stock,
dividend reinvestment plan................... - - 209 - - 209
6,312 shares withheld to satisfy tax
withholding obligations in connection with
the vesting of restricted stock.............. - - (337) - - (337)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2007..................... $ 32,326 2 466,602 (94,185) 146 404,891
==================================================================================
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
--------------------------
2007 2006
--------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income................................................................................ $ 20,433 17,657
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations................................ 35,312 30,827
Depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations.............................. 150 674
Minority interest depreciation and amortization......................................... (121) (113)
Amortization of mortgage loan premiums.................................................. (87) (322)
Gain on sale of real estate investments................................................. (323) (1,091)
Stock-based compensation expense........................................................ 1,476 1,461
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment net of distributions.................... 36 67
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accrued income and other assets....................................................... 5,341 (1,824)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and prepaid rent................................... 4,970 4,778
--------------------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES................................................... 67,187 52,114
--------------------------

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Real estate development................................................................... (78,747) (48,176)
Purchases of real estate.................................................................. (51,711) -
Real estate improvements.................................................................. (10,236) (9,645)
Proceeds from sale of real estate investments............................................. 323 18,548
Changes in other assets and other liabilities............................................. (6,278) (2,660)
--------------------------
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES....................................................... (146,649) (41,933)
--------------------------

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from bank borrowings............................................................. 252,466 120,169
Repayments on bank borrowings............................................................. (186,880) (181,233)
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable...................................................... 75,000 38,000
Principal payments on mortgage notes payable.............................................. (23,445) (22,016)
Debt issuance costs....................................................................... (658) (335)
Distributions paid to stockholders........................................................ (37,439) (35,030)
Proceeds from common stock offering....................................................... - 68,138
Proceeds from exercise of stock options................................................... 1,365 1,317
Proceeds from dividend reinvestment plan.................................................. 209 236
Other..................................................................................... (941) 1,144
--------------------------
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES......................................... 79,677 (9,610)
--------------------------

INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS....................................................... 215 571
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD.......................................... 940 1,915
--------------------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD................................................ $ 1,155 2,486
==========================

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized of $4,425 and $3,096
for 2007 and 2006, respectively........................................................ $ 19,363 18,664
Fair value of common stock awards issued to employees and directors, net of forfeitures... 1,441 3,283
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

(1) BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited financial statements of EastGroup Properties,
Inc. ("EastGroup" or "the Company") have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation
S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In management's opinion, all
adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a
fair presentation have been included. The financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the financial statements contained in the 2006 annual report on
Form 10-K and the notes thereto.

(2) PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of EastGroup
Properties, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its investment in any joint
ventures in which the Company has a controlling interest. At December 31, 2006
and September 30, 2007, the Company had a controlling interest in two joint
ventures: the 80% owned University Business Center and the 80% owned Castilian
Research Center. The Company records 100% of the joint ventures' assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses with minority interests provided for in
accordance with the joint venture agreements. The equity method of accounting is
used for the Company's 50% undivided tenant-in-common interest in Industry
Distribution Center II. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts
have been eliminated in consolidation.

(3) USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and revenues and expenses during the reporting period,
and to disclose material contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(4) RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain reclassifications have been made in the 2006 financial statements
to conform to the 2007 presentation. These amounts include reclassifications in
the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows. The reclassifications
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 resulted in a decrease of $615,000
in cash flows from operating activities and an increase of $615,000 in financing
activities. These reclassifications were immaterial to the prior period
presented.

(5) REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES

EastGroup has one reportable segment - industrial properties. These
properties are concentrated in major Sunbelt markets of the United States,
primarily in the states of Florida, Texas, Arizona and California, have similar
economic characteristics and also meet the other criteria that permit the
properties to be aggregated into one reportable segment. The Company reviews
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the
carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be
generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated
future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the
carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Real estate
properties held for investment are reported at the lower of the carrying amount
or fair value. Depreciation of buildings and other improvements, including
personal property, is computed using the straight-line method over estimated
useful lives of generally 40 years for buildings and 3 to 15 years for
improvements and personal property. Building improvements are capitalized, while
maintenance and repair expenses are charged to expense as incurred. Significant
renovations and improvements that extend the useful life of or improve the
assets are capitalized. Depreciation expense for continuing and discontinued
operations was $10,040,000 and $29,289,000 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007, respectively, and $8,858,000 and $26,364,000 for the same
periods in 2006. The Company's real estate properties at September 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
September 30, 2007 December 31, 2006
--------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Real estate properties:
Land................................................ $ 169,242 154,384
Buildings and building improvements................. 740,524 670,751
Tenant and other improvements....................... 169,074 148,775
Development............................................ 144,302 114,986
--------------------------------------------
1,223,142 1,088,896
Less accumulated depreciation....................... (259,297) (231,106)
--------------------------------------------
$ 963,845 857,790
============================================
</TABLE>
(6)  DEVELOPMENT

During the period when a property is under development, costs associated
with development (i.e., land, construction costs, interest expense during
construction and lease-up, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs
associated with development) are aggregated into the total capitalized costs of
the property. Included in these costs are management's estimates for the
portions of internal costs (primarily personnel costs) that are deemed directly
or indirectly related to such development activities. As the property becomes
occupied, interest, depreciation, property taxes and other costs for the
percentage occupied only are expensed as incurred. When the property becomes 80%
occupied or one year after completion of the shell construction, whichever comes
first, the property is no longer considered a development property and becomes
an industrial property. Once the property becomes classified as an industrial
property, all interest and property taxes are expensed and depreciation
commences on the entire property (excluding the land).

(7) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND ACQUIRED INTANGIBLES

Upon acquisition of real estate properties, the Company applies the
principles of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141 to
determine the allocation of the purchase price among the individual components
of both the tangible and intangible assets based on their respective fair
values. The Company determines whether any financing assumed is above or below
market based upon comparison to similar financing terms for similar properties.
The cost of the properties acquired may be adjusted based on indebtedness
assumed from the seller that is determined to be above or below market rates.
Factors considered by management in allocating the cost of the properties
acquired include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up
periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar
leases. The allocation to tangible assets (land, building and improvements) is
based upon management's determination of the value of the property as if it were
vacant using discounted cash flow models.
The remaining purchase price is allocated among three categories of
intangible assets consisting of the above or below market component of in-place
leases, the value of in-place leases and the value of customer relationships.
The value allocable to the above or below market component of an acquired
in-place lease is determined based upon the present value (using a discount rate
which reflects the risks associated with the acquired leases) of the difference
between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the lease over its
remaining term, and (ii) management's estimate of the amounts that would be paid
using fair market rates over the remaining term of the lease. The amounts
allocated to above and below market leases are included in Other Assets and
Other Liabilities, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheets and are
amortized to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
The total amount of intangible assets is further allocated to in-place lease
values and to customer relationship values based upon management's assessment of
their respective values. These intangible assets are included in Other Assets on
the consolidated balance sheets and are amortized over the remaining term of the
existing lease, or the anticipated life of the customer relationship, as
applicable. Amortization expense for in-place lease intangibles was $732,000 and
$2,325,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively,
and $551,000 and $1,925,000 for the same periods in 2006. Amortization of above
and below market leases was immaterial for all periods presented.
The Company acquired six operating properties during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 for a total cost of $51,120,000, of which $48,142,000 was
allocated to real estate properties. In accordance with SFAS No. 141,
intangibles associated with the purchase of real estate were allocated as
follows: $3,226,000 to in-place lease intangibles and $246,000 to above market
leases (both included in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheet) and
$494,000 to below market leases (included in Other Liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet). These costs are amortized over the remaining lives
of the associated leases in place at the time of acquisition.
The Company periodically reviews (at least annually) the recoverability of
goodwill and (on a quarterly basis) the recoverability of other intangibles for
possible impairment. In management's opinion, no material impairment of goodwill
and other intangibles existed at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006.

(8) REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE/DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

At September 30, 2007, real estate held for sale consisted of Delp
Distribution Center I, a 152,000 square foot property in Memphis, Tennessee,
with a carrying value of $2,372,000. Subsequent to quarter-end, the Company sold
the property for $3,275,000 and realized a net gain of approximately $600,000.
Real estate properties that are held for sale are reported at the lower of
the carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell and are not
depreciated while they are held for sale. In accordance with the guidelines
established under SFAS No. 144, the results of operations for the properties
sold or held for sale during the reported periods are shown under Discontinued
Operations on the consolidated income statements. No interest expense was
allocated to the properties that are held for sale or whose operations are
included under Discontinued Operations.
(9)  OTHER ASSETS

A summary of the Company's Other Assets follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
September 30, 2007 December 31, 2006
-------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Leasing costs (principally commissions), net of accumulated amortization.... $ 18,067 15,821
Straight-line rent receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts....... 13,913 13,530
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts................. 3,017 5,189
Acquired in-place lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization
of $4,778 and $4,294 for 2007 and 2006, respectively.................... 5,575 4,674
Goodwill.................................................................... 990 990
Prepaid expenses and other assets........................................... 7,324 10,258
-------------------------------------------
$ 48,886 50,462
===========================================
</TABLE>

(10) ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

A summary of the Company's Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
September 30, 2007 December 31, 2006
-------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Property taxes payable................................................... $ 14,192 8,235
Development costs payable................................................ 5,483 6,504
Dividends payable........................................................ 3,002 2,839
Other payables and accrued expenses...................................... 14,040 15,011
-------------------------------------------
$ 36,717 32,589
===========================================
</TABLE>

(11) OTHER LIABILITIES

A summary of the Company's Other Liabilities follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
September 30, 2007 December 31, 2006
-------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Security deposits........................................................ $ 7,239 6,414
Prepaid rent and other deferred income................................... 3,195 4,375
Other liabilities........................................................ 952 958
-------------------------------------------
$ 11,386 11,747
===========================================
</TABLE>

(12) COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Comprehensive income is comprised of net income plus all other changes in
equity from nonowner sources. The components of accumulated other comprehensive
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 are presented in the
Company's consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity and for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 are summarized below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
----------------------------------------------------
2007 2006 2007 2006
----------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Balance at beginning of period.................................... $ 362 546 314 311
Change in fair value of interest rate swap.................... (216) (222) (168) 13
----------------------------------------------------
Balance at end of period.......................................... $ 146 324 146 324
====================================================
</TABLE>

(13) EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share (EPS) represents the amount of earnings for the
period available to each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting
period. The Company's basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income available
to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding.
Diluted EPS represents  the amount of earnings for the period  available to
each share of common stock outstanding during the reporting period and to each
share that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares
for all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the reporting
period. The Company calculates diluted EPS by dividing net income available to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
plus the dilutive effect of nonvested restricted stock and stock options had the
options been exercised. The dilutive effect of stock options and their
equivalents (such as nonvested restricted stock) was determined using the
treasury stock method which assumes exercise of the options as of the beginning
of the period or when issued, if later, and assumes proceeds from the exercise
of options are used to purchase common stock at the average market price during
the period.
Reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in the basic and diluted
EPS computations is as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
----------------------------------------------------
2007 2006 2007 2006
----------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BASIC EPS COMPUTATION
Numerator-net income available to common stockholders.......... $ 7,058 5,264 18,465 15,689
Denominator-weighted average shares outstanding................ 23,562 22,235 23,548 22,017
DILUTED EPS COMPUTATION
Numerator-net income available to common stockholders.......... $ 7,058 5,264 18,465 15,689
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding.......................... 23,562 22,235 23,548 22,017
Common stock options......................................... 81 136 95 148
Nonvested restricted stock................................... 135 182 124 169
----------------------------------------------------
Total Shares.............................................. 23,778 22,553 23,767 22,334
====================================================
</TABLE>

(14) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004) (SFAS No. 123R),
Share-Based Payment, on January 1, 2006. The rule requires that the compensation
cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial
statements and that the cost be measured on the fair value of the equity or
liability instruments issued. The Company's adoption of SFAS No. 123R had no
material impact on its overall financial position or results of operations.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the Company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, prospectively to all awards granted,
modified, or settled after January 1, 2002.

MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
The Company has a management incentive plan which was approved by the
shareholders and adopted in 2004 (the 2004 Plan), which authorizes the issuance
of up to 1,900,000 shares of common stock to employees in the form of options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock (limited to 570,000 shares),
deferred stock units, performance shares, stock bonuses, and stock. Total shares
available for grant were 1,713,281 at September 30, 2007. Typically, the Company
issues new shares to fulfill stock grants or upon the exercise of stock options.
Stock-based compensation was $845,000 and $2,041,000 for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, of which $246,000 and $681,000
were capitalized as part of the Company's development costs. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, stock-based compensation was $865,000 and
$1,954,000, respectively, of which $209,000 and $559,000 were capitalized as
part of the Company's development costs.

Restricted Stock
The purpose of the restricted stock plan is to act as a retention device
since it allows participants to benefit from dividends on shares as well as
potential stock appreciation. Vesting occurs from 2 1/2 years to nine years from
the date of grant for awards subject to service only. Restricted stock is
granted to executive officers subject to the satisfaction of annual performance
goals and multi-year market conditions as determined by the Compensation
Committee with vesting over one to seven years from the grant date. Restricted
stock is granted to non-executive officers and other employees subject only to
continued service. Under the modified prospective application method, the
Company continues to recognize compensation cost on a straight-line basis over
the service period for awards that precede the adoption of SFAS No. 123R. The
cost for performance-based awards after January 1, 2006 is amortized using the
graded vesting attribution method which recognizes each separate vesting portion
of the award as a separate award on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period. This method accelerates the expensing of the award compared to
the straight-line method. The expense for market-based awards after January 1,
2006 and awards that only require service is amortized on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service periods.
The total compensation expense for service and performance based awards is
based upon the fair market value of the shares on the grant date, adjusted for
estimated forfeitures. The grant date fair value for awards that are subject to
a market condition (total shareholder return) was determined using a simulation
pricing model developed to specifically accommodate the unique features of the
awards.
In the second quarter of 2007, the Company granted shares to executive
officers contingent upon the attainment of certain annual performance goals.
These goals are for the period ending December 31, 2007, so any shares issued
upon attainment of these goals will be issued after that date. The number of
shares to be issued could range from zero to 34,973. These shares will vest 20%
on the date shares are determined and awarded and 20% per year on each January 1
for the subsequent four years. During the second quarter of 2007, 8,150 shares
were granted to non-executive officers and are subject only to continued service
as of the vesting date. These shares vest 1/3 on January 1, 2008, 2009, and
2010.
In the second quarter of 2006, the Company granted shares to executive
officers contingent upon the attainment of certain annual performance goals and
multi-year market conditions. In March 2007, 36,196 shares were awarded based on
the attainment of the 2006 annual performance goals at a weighted average grant
date fair value of $43.83 per share. These shares vested 20% on March 8, 2007,
and will vest 20% per year over the next four years. The weighted average grant
date fair value for shares to be awarded under the multi-year market conditions
was $26.34 per share with a total cost of approximately $2.1 million. These
shares will vest over four years following the three-year performance
measurement period which ends on December 31, 2008.
During the restricted period for awards no longer subject to contingencies,
the Company accrues dividends and holds the certificates for the shares;
however, the employee can vote the shares. For shares subject to contingencies,
dividends are accrued based upon the number of shares expected to be awarded.
Share certificates and dividends are delivered to the employee as they vest. As
of September 30, 2007, there was $2,820,000 of unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested restricted stock compensation that is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 2.05 years.
Following is a summary of the total restricted shares granted, forfeited
and delivered (vested) to employees with the related weighted average grant date
fair value share prices. The table does not include the shares granted in 2006
that are contingent on market conditions or shares granted in 2007 that are
subject to the satisfaction of annual performance goals. Of the shares that
vested in the first quarter of 2007, 6,312 shares were withheld by the Company
to satisfy the tax obligations for those employees who elected this option as
permitted under the applicable equity plan. As of the vesting date, the fair
value of shares that vested during the first quarter of 2007 was $1,743,000.
There were no shares that vested in the second or third quarters of 2007.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Restricted Stock Activity: Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2007 September 30, 2007
-----------------------------------------------------
Weighted Weighted
Average Average
Grant Date Grant Date
Shares Fair Value Shares Fair Value
-----------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Nonvested at beginning of period.... 206,526 $ 30.60 196,671 $ 28.66
Granted (1)......................... - - 44,346 43.91
Forfeited........................... - - (1,800) 22.82
Vested.............................. - - (32,691) 37.40
----------- ------------
Nonvested at end of period.......... 206,526 30.60 206,526 30.60
=========== ============
</TABLE>
(1) Consists of 36,196 shares issued in March 2007 that were granted in 2006
subject to the satisfaction of annual performance goals and 8,150 shares granted
in June 2007 subject to service requirements only.

Following is a vesting schedule of the total nonvested shares as of September
30, 2007:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Nonvested Shares Vesting Schedule Number of Shares
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
Remainder of 2007......................... 62,437
2008...................................... 83,170
2009...................................... 43,727
2010...................................... 9,956
2011...................................... 7,236
----------------
Total Nonvested Shares.................... 206,526
================
</TABLE>

Employee Stock Options
The Company has not granted stock options to employees since 2002.
Outstanding employee stock options vested equally over a two-year period;
accordingly, all options are now vested. There were no options granted,
forfeited, or expired during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2007.
The intrinsic value realized by employees was $869,000 from the exercise of
38,000 options during the three months ended September 30, 2007 and $1,367,000
from the exercise of 53,200 options for the nine months ended September 30,
2007.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Employee outstanding stock options at September 30, 2007, all exercisable:
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Average Remaining Weighted Average Intrinsic
Exercise Price Range Number Contractual Life Exercise Price Value
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 18.50-25.30 81,856 1.9 years $ 20.54 $2,024,000
</TABLE>

DIRECTORS EQUITY PLAN
The Company has a directors equity plan that was approved by shareholders
and adopted in 2005 (the 2005 Plan), which authorizes the issuance of up to
50,000 shares of common stock through awards of shares and restricted shares
granted to nonemployee directors of the
Company.  The 2005 Plan replaced prior plans under which  directors were granted
stock option awards. Outstanding grants under prior plans will be fulfilled
under those plans.
In 2005, 481 shares of restricted stock at $41.57 were granted, of which
240 shares were vested as of September 30, 2007. The restricted stock vests 25%
per year for four years. As of September 30, 2007, there was $8,800 of
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock
compensation that is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
1.75 years. In 2007, 3,048 common shares of stock were issued to directors.
There were 41,869 shares available for grant under the 2005 Plan at September
30, 2007.
Stock-based compensation expense for directors was $39,000 and $116,000 for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and $39,000
and $66,000 for the same periods in 2006. The intrinsic value realized by
directors was $32,000 from the exercise of 2,000 options during the three months
ended September 30, 2007 and $218,000 from the exercise of 8,750 options for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007. There were no options granted or expired
during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Director outstanding stock options at September 30, 2007, all exercisable:
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Average Remaining Weighted Average Intrinsic
Exercise Price Range Number Contractual Life Exercise Price Value
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
$ 20.25-26.60 42,750 3.6 years $ 23.01 $951,000
</TABLE>

(15) NEWLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company's financial statements and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be
taken in a tax return. FIN 48 was effective January 1, 2007. With few
exceptions, the Company's 2003 and earlier tax years are closed for examination
by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities. The adoption of FIN 48 had an
immaterial impact on the Company's overall financial position or results of
operations during the first nine months of 2007.

(16) SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 11, 2007, EastGroup closed on the sale of Delp Distribution
Center I (152,000 square feet) in Memphis, Tennessee. This property was sold for
$3,275,000, and the Company recognized a gain of approximately $600,000.
During the fourth quarter, the Company expects to receive a condemnation
award, primarily compensation for land in Arion Business Park, of approximately
$3,050,000 with a gain of approximately $2,584,000.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S  DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.

OVERVIEW
EastGroup's goal is to maximize shareholder value by being the leading
provider in its markets of functional, flexible, and quality business
distribution space for location sensitive tenants primarily in the 5,000 to
50,000 square foot range. The Company develops, acquires and operates
distribution facilities, the majority of which are clustered around major
transportation features in supply constrained submarkets in major Sunbelt
regions. The Company's core markets are in the states of Florida, Texas, Arizona
and California.
The Company's primary revenue is rental income; as such, EastGroup's
greatest challenge is leasing space. During the nine months ended September 30,
2007, leases on 3,775,000 square feet (16.1%) of EastGroup's total square
footage of 23,499,000 expired, and the Company was successful in renewing or
re-leasing 91% of that total. In addition, EastGroup leased 659,000 square feet
of other vacant space during this period. During the nine months ended September
30, 2007, average rental rates on new and renewal leases increased by 11.1%.
EastGroup's total leased percentage increased to 97.0% at September 30,
2007 from 96.3% at September 30, 2006. Leases scheduled to expire for the
remainder of 2007 were 2.9% of the portfolio on a square foot basis at September
30, 2007, and this figure was reduced to less than 1% as of November 6, 2007.
Property net operating income (PNOI) from same properties increased 6.5% for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007 and 4.6% for the nine months as compared to the
same periods in 2006. The third quarter of 2007 was EastGroup's seventeenth
consecutive quarter of same property PNOI growth.
The Company generates new sources of leasing revenue through its
acquisition and development programs. During 2007, EastGroup purchased six
operating properties (1,001,000 square feet in 14 buildings), one property for
redevelopment (68,000 square feet) and 140.6 acres of land for a total of $67.5
million. Two of the properties are in Charlotte, North Carolina, a new market
for EastGroup in late 2006; the Company now owns almost one million square feet
in Charlotte. The other four operating properties are located in Tucson,
Arizona; City of Industry, California; and Dallas and San Antonio, Texas. San
Antonio was a new market for EastGroup in 2004 with current square footage of
nearly 1.7 million including properties under development. The third new market
for EastGroup in the last few years is Fort Myers, Florida, where the Company
completed the construction of two buildings during the third quarter. The
property purchased for redevelopment is located in Denver, Colorado, and will
complement our current presence there.
EastGroup continues to see targeted development as a major contributor to
the Company's growth. The Company mitigates risks associated with development
through a Board-approved maximum level of land held for development and by
adjusting development start dates according to leasing activity. During 2007,
the Company transferred ten properties (691,000 square feet) with aggregate
costs of $45.3 million at the date of transfer from development to real estate
properties. These properties, all of which are 100% leased, are located in
Chandler, Arizona; Orlando and Tampa, Florida; and Houston and San Antonio,
Texas. During the second quarter, the Company executed a ten-year lease for a
404,000 square foot build-to-suit development in its Southridge Commerce Park in
Orlando. The projected cost of this development is approximately $20 million;
construction began in June with occupancy projected in the second quarter of
2008.
The Company primarily funds its acquisition and development programs
through a $175 million line of credit (as discussed in Liquidity and Capital
Resources). As market conditions permit, EastGroup issues equity, including
preferred equity, and/or employs fixed-rate, nonrecourse first mortgage debt to
replace the short-term bank borrowings.
On August 8, 2007, the Company closed on a $75 million, nonrecourse first
mortgage loan secured by properties containing 1,448,000 square feet. The loan
has a fixed interest rate of 5.57%, a ten-year term and an amortization schedule
of 20 years. The proceeds of this note were used to reduce variable rate bank
borrowings.
Tower Automotive, Inc. (Tower) filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in early
2005. Tower leases 210,000 square feet from EastGroup under a lease expiring in
December 2010 and has been current with their lease payments since declaring
bankruptcy. In July 2007, the Bankruptcy Court approved the affirmation of
Tower's lease with EastGroup. On July 31, 2007, Tower announced that it had
completed the sale of substantially all of its assets to Tower Automotive, LLC,
an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. The sale concluded Tower's
restructuring process and finalized its emergence from Chapter 11.
EastGroup has one reportable segment - industrial properties. These
properties are primarily located in major Sunbelt regions of the United States,
have similar economic characteristics and also meet the other criteria that
permit the properties to be aggregated into one reportable segment. The
Company's chief decision makers use two primary measures of operating results in
making decisions: property net operating income (PNOI), defined as income from
real estate operations less property operating expenses (before interest expense
and depreciation and amortization), and funds from operations available to
common stockholders (FFO), defined as net income (loss) computed in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), excluding gains or
losses from sales of depreciable real estate property, plus real estate related
depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated
partnerships and joint ventures. The Company calculates FFO based on the
National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts' (NAREIT) definition.
PNOI is a supplemental industry reporting measurement used to evaluate the
performance of the Company's real estate investments. The Company believes that
the exclusion of depreciation and amortization in the industry's calculation of
PNOI provides a supplemental indicator of the property's performance since real
estate values have historically risen or fallen with market conditions. PNOI as
calculated by the Company may not be comparable to similarly titled but
differently calculated measures for other REITs. The major factors that
influence PNOI are occupancy levels, acquisitions and sales, development
properties that achieve stabilized operations, rental rate increases or
decreases, and the recoverability of operating expenses. The Company's success
depends largely upon its ability to lease space and to recover from tenants the
operating costs associated with those leases.
Real estate income is comprised of rental income,  pass-through  income and
other real estate income including lease termination fees. Property operating
expenses are comprised of property taxes, insurance, utilities, repair and
maintenance expenses, management fees, other operating costs and bad debt
expense. Generally, the Company's most significant operating expenses are
property taxes and insurance. Tenant leases may be net leases in which the total
operating expenses are recoverable, modified gross leases in which some of the
operating expenses are recoverable, or gross leases in which no expenses are
recoverable (gross leases represent only a small portion of the Company's total
leases). Increases in property operating expenses are fully recoverable under
net leases and recoverable to a high degree under modified gross leases.
Modified gross leases often include base year amounts and expense increases over
these amounts are recoverable. The Company's exposure to property operating
expenses is primarily due to vacancies and leases for occupied space that limit
the amount of expenses that can be recovered.
The Company believes FFO is an appropriate measure of performance for
equity real estate investment trusts. The Company believes that excluding
depreciation and amortization in the calculation of FFO is appropriate since
real estate values have historically increased or decreased based on market
conditions. FFO is not considered as an alternative to net income (determined in
accordance with GAAP) as an indication of the Company's financial performance,
nor is it a measure of the Company's liquidity or indicative of funds available
to provide for the Company's cash needs, including its ability to make
distributions. The Company's key drivers affecting FFO are changes in PNOI (as
discussed above), interest rates, the amount of leverage the Company employs and
general and administrative expense. The following table presents on a
comparative basis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006 reconciliations of PNOI and FFO Available to Common Stockholders to Net
Income.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
----------------------------------------------------
2007 2006 2007 2006
----------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except per share data)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Income from real estate operations............................................ $ 39,153 33,674 112,192 98,554
Expenses from real estate operations.......................................... (10,490) (9,438) (30,759) (27,542)
----------------------------------------------------
PROPERTY NET OPERATING INCOME................................................. 28,663 24,236 81,433 71,012

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investment (before depreciation)......... 98 107 313 312
Income from discontinued operations (before depreciation and amortization).... 72 356 237 1,408
Interest income............................................................... 38 68 94 111
Other income.................................................................. 20 221 65 255
Interest expense.............................................................. (7,086) (6,314) (20,162) (19,046)
General and administrative expense............................................ (1,993) (1,990) (5,868) (5,434)
Minority interest in earnings (before depreciation and amortization).......... (175) (217) (562) (565)
Gain on sale of nondepreciable real estate investments........................ 9 7 23 662
Dividends on Series D preferred shares........................................ (656) (656) (1,968) (1,968)
----------------------------------------------------

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS........................ 18,990 15,818 53,605 46,747
Depreciation and amortization from continuing operations...................... (12,200) (10,396) (35,312) (30,827)
Depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations.................... (41) (163) (150) (674)
Depreciation from unconsolidated investment................................... (33) (33) (99) (99)
Minority interest depreciation and amortization............................... 42 38 121 113
Gain on sale of depreciable real estate investments........................... 300 - 300 429
----------------------------------------------------

NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS................................... 7,058 5,264 18,465 15,689
Dividends on preferred shares................................................. 656 656 1,968 1,968
----------------------------------------------------

NET INCOME.................................................................... $ 7,714 5,920 20,433 17,657
====================================================

Net income available to common stockholders per diluted share................. $ .30 .23 .78 .70
Funds from operations available to common stockholders per diluted share...... .80 .70 2.26 2.09

Diluted shares for earnings per share and funds from operations............... 23,778 22,553 23,767 22,334
</TABLE>
The Company analyzes the following performance trends in evaluating the progress
of the Company:

o The FFO change per share represents the increase or decrease in FFO per
share from the same quarter in the current year compared to the prior year.
FFO per share for the third quarter of 2007 was $.80 per share compared
with $.70 per share for the same period of 2006, an increase of 14.3%. The
increase in FFO was mainly due to a PNOI increase of $4,427,000, or 18.3%.
This increase in PNOI was primarily attributable to $1,517,000 from newly
developed properties, $1,395,000 from 2006 and 2007 acquisitions and
$1,547,000 from same property growth. The third quarter of 2007 was the
thirteenth consecutive quarter of increased FFO as compared to the previous
year's quarter. Included in same property growth was $.04 per share in
termination fees for the third quarter of 2007 mainly from one tenant's
early termination (this space has already been re-leased), compared to $.01
per share in the same quarter of 2006. Without termination fees, the
increase in FFO per share for the third quarter would have been 10.1%.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, FFO was $2.26 per share
compared with $2.09 for the same period of 2006, an increase of 8.1% per
share; excluding gain on land sales of $.03 per share for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, the increase was 9.2% per share. The increase in
FFO was mainly due to a PNOI increase of $10,421,000, or 14.7%. This
increase in PNOI was primarily attributable to $3,954,000 from newly
developed properties, $3,409,000 from 2006 and 2007 acquisitions and
$3,165,000 from same property growth. Included in same property growth was
$.04 per share in termination fees for the nine months in 2007 mainly from
one tenant's early termination (this space has already been re-leased),
compared to $.02 per share in the same period of 2006. Without termination
fees and gain on land sales for the nine months, the increase in FFO per
share would have been 8.8%.

o Same property net operating income change represents the PNOI increase or
decrease for operating properties owned during the entire current period
and prior year reporting period. PNOI from same properties increased 6.5%
for the third quarter. The third quarter of 2007 was the seventeenth
consecutive quarter of improved same property operations. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, PNOI from same properties increased 4.6%.

o Occupancy is the percentage of total leasable square footage for which the
lease term has commenced as of the close of the reporting period. Occupancy
at September 30, 2007 was 95.7%, slightly up from the previous quarter and
the third quarter of 2006. Occupancy has ranged from 91.0% to 96.1% for
eighteen consecutive quarters.

o Rental rate change represents the rental rate increase or decrease on new
and renewal leases compared to the prior leases on the same space. Rental
rate increases on new and renewal leases (5.8% of total square footage)
averaged 11.7% for the third quarter of 2007; for the nine months, rental
rate increases on new and renewal leases (17.5% of total square footage)
averaged 11.1%.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The Company's management considers the following accounting policies and
estimates to be critical to the reported operations of the Company.

Real Estate Properties
The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired properties to net
tangible and identified intangible assets based on their respective fair values.
Factors considered by management in allocating the cost of the properties
acquired include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up
periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar
leases. The allocation to tangible assets (land, building and improvements) is
based upon management's determination of the value of the property as if it were
vacant using discounted cash flow models. The remaining purchase price is
allocated among three categories of intangible assets consisting of the above or
below market component of in-place leases, the value of in-place leases and the
value of customer relationships. The value allocable to the above or below
market component of an acquired in-place lease is determined based upon the
present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with
the acquired leases) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be
paid pursuant to the lease over its remaining term, and (ii) management's
estimate of the amounts that would be paid using fair market rates over the
remaining term of the lease. The amounts allocated to above and below market
leases are included in Other Assets and Other Liabilities, respectively, on the
consolidated balance sheets and are amortized to rental income over the
remaining terms of the respective leases. The total amount of intangible assets
is further allocated to in-place lease values and to customer relationship
values based upon management's assessment of their respective values. These
intangible assets are included in Other Assets on the consolidated balance
sheets and are amortized over the remaining term of the existing lease, or the
anticipated life of the customer relationship, as applicable.
During the industrial development stage, costs associated with development
(i.e., land, construction costs, interest expense during construction and
lease-up, property taxes and other direct and indirect costs associated with
development) are aggregated into the total capitalization of the property.
Included in these costs are management's estimates for the portions of internal
costs (primarily personnel costs) that are deemed directly or indirectly related
to such development activities.
The Company reviews its real estate investments for impairment of value
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
an asset may not be recoverable. If any real estate investment is considered
permanently impaired, a loss is recorded to reduce the carrying value of the
property to its estimated fair value. Real estate assets to be sold are reported
at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less selling costs. The
evaluation of real estate investments involves many subjective assumptions
dependent upon future economic events that affect the ultimate value of the
property. Currently, the Company's management is not aware of any impairment
issues nor has it experienced any significant impairment issues in recent years.
In the event of impairment, the property's basis would be reduced and the
impairment would be recognized as a current period charge in the income
statement.

Valuation of Receivables
The Company is subject to tenant defaults and bankruptcies that could
affect the collection of outstanding receivables. In order to mitigate these
risks, the Company performs credit reviews and analyses on prospective tenants
before significant leases are executed. On a quarterly basis, the Company
evaluates outstanding receivables and estimates the allowance for doubtful
accounts. Management specifically analyzes aged receivables, customer
credit-worthiness, historical bad debts and current economic trends when
evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company
believes that its allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate for its
outstanding receivables for the periods presented. In the event that the
allowance for doubtful accounts is insufficient for an account that is
subsequently written off, additional bad debt expense would be recognized as a
current period charge in the income statement.

Tax Status
EastGroup, a Maryland corporation, has qualified as a real estate
investment trust under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code and intends
to continue to qualify as such. To maintain its status as a REIT, the Company is
required to distribute at least 90% of its ordinary taxable income to its
stockholders. The Company has the option of (i) reinvesting the sales price of
properties sold through tax-deferred exchanges, allowing for a deferral of
capital gains on the sale, (ii) paying out capital gains to the stockholders
with no tax to the Company, or (iii) treating the capital gains as having been
distributed to the stockholders, paying the tax on the gain deemed distributed
and allocating the tax paid as a credit to the stockholders. The Company
distributed all of its 2006 taxable income to its stockholders and expects to
distribute all of its taxable income in 2007. Accordingly, no provision for
income taxes was necessary in 2006, nor is it expected to be necessary for 2007.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

EastGroup's assets were $1,018,817 at September 30, 2007, an increase of
$107,030,000 from December 31, 2006. Liabilities increased $120,821,000 to
$611,663,000 and stockholders' equity decreased $13,906,000 to $404,891,000
during the same period. The paragraphs that follow explain these changes in
detail.
ASSETS

Real Estate Properties
Real estate properties increased $104,930,000 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 primarily due to the purchase of six properties and the
transfer of ten properties from development, as detailed below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Date
Real Estate Properties Acquired in 2007 Location Size Acquired Cost (1)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Square feet) (In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Westinghouse and Lindbergh I & II.... Charlotte, NC 181,000 01/09/07 $ 8,939
North Stemmons III................... Dallas, TX 60,000 01/30/07 2,446
Fairgrounds Business Park............ San Antonio, TX 231,000 03/02/07 9,853
Nations Ford Distribution Center..... Charlotte, NC 456,000 03/08/07 20,096
Country Club Commerce Center II...... Tucson, AZ 45,000 05/15/07 3,796
Industry Distribution Center III..... City of Industry, CA 28,000 06/29/07 3,012
----------- ----------------
Total Acquisitions............. 1,001,000 $ 48,142
=========== ================
</TABLE>
(1) Total cost of the properties acquired was $51,120,000, of which $48,142,000
was allocated to real estate properties as indicated above. Intangibles
associated with the purchases of real estate were allocated as follows:
$3,226,000 to in-place lease intangibles and $246,000 to above market
leases (both included in Other Assets on the consolidated balance sheet)
and $494,000 to below market leases (included in Other Liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet). All of these costs are amortized over the
remaining lives of the associated leases in place at the time of
acquisition.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Real Estate Properties Transferred from Date
Development in 2007 Location Size Transferred Cost at Transfer
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Square feet) (In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Santan 10 II.......................... Chandler, AZ 85,000 01/01/07 $ 5,501
Oak Creek III......................... Tampa, FL 61,000 03/23/07 3,578
Southridge VI......................... Orlando, FL 81,000 04/01/07 5,294
Arion 16.............................. San Antonio, TX 64,000 04/20/07 3,795
Southridge III........................ Orlando, FL 81,000 04/20/07 5,166
Southridge II......................... Orlando, FL 41,000 05/01/07 3,790
World Houston 15...................... Houston, TX 63,000 05/01/07 4,802
World Houston 23...................... Houston, TX 125,000 05/01/07 7,385
Arion 17.............................. San Antonio, TX 40,000 06/01/07 3,028
Beltway Crossing II................... Houston, TX 50,000 09/01/07 2,986
----------- -----------------
Total Developments Transferred.. 691,000 $ 45,325
=========== =================
</TABLE>
The Company made capital improvements of $10,236,000 on existing and
acquired properties (included in the Capital Expenditures table under Results of
Operations). Also, the Company incurred costs of $4,106,000 on development
properties subsequent to transfer to real estate properties; the Company records
these expenditures as development costs on the consolidated statements of cash
flows during the 12-month period following transfer. These additions were offset
by the transfer of one property into the category "held for sale" with costs of
$3,470,000.

Development
The investment in development at September 30, 2007 was $144,302,000
compared to $114,986,000 at December 31, 2006. Total capital invested for
development during 2007 was $78,747,000. In addition to the costs of $74,641,000
incurred for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as detailed in the
development activity table, the Company incurred costs of $4,106,000 on
developments during the 12-month period following transfer to real estate
properties.
In the first quarter of 2007, EastGroup acquired Centennial Park
Distribution Center in Denver for $4,131,000. The building, which was built in
1990, contains 68,000 square feet and is located near Centennial Airport in
southeast Denver. The business distribution property is currently vacant, and
EastGroup is redeveloping it as a multi-tenant facility. Costs associated with
this acquisition are included in the development activity table.
In addition, the Company executed a ten-year lease with United Stationers
Supply Co. for a 404,000 square foot build-to-suit development in its Southridge
Commerce Park in Orlando. The projected cost of this development is
approximately $20 million; construction began in June 2007 with occupancy
projected in the second quarter of 2008. As part of this transaction, EastGroup
entered into contracts with United Stationers to purchase two of its existing
properties (278,000 square feet) in Jacksonville and Tampa, Florida, for
approximately $9 million. These acquisitions are expected to close in mid-2008,
in line with completion of the build-to-suit development.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, EastGroup purchased over
102 acres of developable land for approximately $11.7 million. Costs associated
with these acquisitions are included in the development activity table. The
Company transferred ten developments to real estate properties during 2007 with
a total investment of $45,325,000 as of the date of transfer.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Costs Incurred
----------------------------------------------
Costs For the Cumulative Estimated
Transferred Nine Months as of Total
DEVELOPMENT Size in 2007(1) Ended 9/30/07 9/30/07 Costs(2)
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Square feet) (In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
LEASE-UP
Oak Creek V, Tampa, FL......................... 100,000 $ - 501 5,334 6,400
Beltway Crossing III & IV, Houston, TX......... 110,000 - 908 5,986 6,500
World Houston 22, Houston, TX.................. 68,000 - 1,099 4,169 4,200
Interstate Commons III, Phoenix, AZ............ 38,000 - 2,258 2,831 3,200
Oak Creek A & B, Tampa, FL(3).................. 35,000 - 2,064 2,815 3,300
Southridge VII, Orlando, FL.................... 92,000 3,312 2,244 5,556 6,700
SunCoast I & II, Fort Myers, FL................ 126,000 - 5,334 10,612 10,900
Castilian Research Center, Santa Barbara, CA... 37,000 - 3,907 8,829 8,900
World Houston 24, Houston, TX.................. 93,000 - 3,256 4,357 5,600
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Lease-up................................... 699,000 3,312 21,571 50,489 55,700
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UNDER CONSTRUCTION
Wetmore II, Bldg A, San Antonio, TX............ 34,000 504 1,502 2,006 3,200
Wetmore II, Bldgs B & C, San Antonio, TX....... 124,000 1,269 3,740 5,009 7,600
World Houston 25, Houston, TX.................. 66,000 - 2,378 3,023 3,700
40th Avenue Distribution Center, Phoenix, AZ... 89,000 - 3,244 4,345 6,100
Centennial Park, Denver, CO.................... 68,000 - 4,494 4,494 4,900
Beltway Crossing V, Houston, TX................ 83,000 1,077 1,767 2,844 5,000
Arion 18, San Antonio, TX...................... 20,000 1,236 - 1,236 2,500
Oak Creek VI, Tampa, FL........................ 89,000 2,412 - 2,412 5,800
Southridge VIII, Orlando, FL................... 91,000 2,407 - 2,407 6,700
Beltway Crossing VI, Houston, TX............... 127,000 1,058 - 1,058 6,400
Wetmore II, Bldg D, San Antonio, TX............ 124,000 1,382 - 1,382 8,500
Sky Harbor, Phoenix, AZ........................ 261,000 6,946 1,613 8,559 22,800
Southridge XII, Orlando, FL.................... 404,000 4,089 3,952 8,041 20,400
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Under Construction......................... 1,580,000 22,380 22,690 46,816 103,600
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PROSPECTIVE DEVELOPMENT (PRIMARILY LAND)
Phoenix, AZ.................................... - (6,946) 431 - -
Tucson, AZ..................................... 205,000 - 1,581 1,907 14,300
Tampa, FL...................................... 335,000 (2,412) 1,787 4,032 20,100
Orlando, FL.................................... 229,000 (9,808) 4,437 3,000 13,700
West Palm Beach, FL............................ 20,000 - 107 792 2,300
Fort Myers, FL................................. 752,000 - 1,752 14,420 56,500
El Paso, TX.................................... 251,000 - - 2,444 9,600
Houston, TX.................................... 1,492,000 (2,135) 9,527 16,899 88,300
San Antonio, TX................................ 410,000 (4,391) 3,783 2,798 24,300
Jackson, MS.................................... 28,000 - - 705 2,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Prospective Development.................... 3,722,000 (25,692) 23,405 46,997 231,100
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6,001,000 $ - 67,666 144,302 390,400
==============================================================================

DEVELOPMENTS COMPLETED AND TRANSFERRED
TO REAL ESTATE PROPERTIES DURING 2007
Santan 10 II, Chandler, AZ..................... 85,000 $ - - 5,501
Oak Creek III, Tampa, FL...................... 61,000 - 119 3,578
Southridge VI, Orlando, FL..................... 81,000 - 323 5,294
Arion 16, San Antonio, TX...................... 64,000 - 1,411 3,795
Southridge III, Orlando, FL.................... 81,000 - 713 5,166
Southridge II, Orlando, FL..................... 41,000 - 244 3,790
World Houston 15, Houston, TX.................. 63,000 - 276 4,802
World Houston 23, Houston, TX.................. 125,000 - 2,888 7,385
Arion 17, San Antonio, TX...................... 40,000 - 90 3,028
Beltway Crossing II, Houston, TX............... 50,000 - 911 2,986
------------------------------------------------------------
Total Transferred to Real Estate Properties...... 691,000 $ - 6,975 45,325 (4)
============================================================
</TABLE>
(1) Represents costs transferred from Prospective Development (principally land)
to Under Construction (or subsequently to Lease-up) during the period.
(2) The information provided above includes forward-looking data based on
current construction schedules, the status of lease negotiations with potential
tenants and other relevant factors currently available to the Company. There can
be no assurance that any of these factors will not change or that any change
will not affect the accuracy of such forward-looking data. Among the factors
that could affect the accuracy of the forward-looking statements are weather or
other  natural   occurrence,   default  or  other  failure  of   performance  by
contractors, increases in the price of construction materials or the
availability of such materials, failure to obtain necessary permits or approvals
from government entities, changes in local and/or national economic conditions,
increased competition for tenants or other occurrences that could depress rental
rates, and other factors not within the control of the Company.
(3) These buildings were developed for sale.
(4) Represents cumulative costs at the date of transfer.

During the quarter, one property was transferred to the category real
estate held for sale with costs of $3,470,000 and accumulated depreciation of
$1,098,000. Accumulated depreciation on real estate properties and real estate
held for sale increased $29,288,000 due to depreciation expense.
A summary of Other Assets is presented in Note 9 in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.

LIABILITIES

Mortgage notes payable increased $51,468,000 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 as a result of a $75,000,000 mortgage loan signed by the
Company during the third quarter, which was offset by the repayment of two
mortgage loans of $14,220,000, regularly scheduled principal payments of
$9,225,000, and mortgage loan premium amortization of $87,000.
Notes payable to banks increased $65,586,000 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 as a result of advances of $252,466,000 exceeding repayments
of $186,880,000. The Company's credit facilities are described in greater detail
under Liquidity and Capital Resources.
See Note 10 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a
summary of Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses. See Note 11 in the Notes to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of Other Liabilities.

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Distributions in excess of earnings increased $17,170,000 as a result of
dividends on common and preferred stock of $37,603,000 exceeding net income for
financial reporting purposes of $20,433,000. See Note 14 in the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the changes in
additional paid-in capital resulting from stock-based compensation.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(Comments are for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006.)

Net income available to common stockholders for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2007 was $7,058,000 ($.30 per basic and diluted share) and
$18,465,000 ($.78 per basic and diluted share) compared to $5,264,000 ($.24 per
basic and $.23 per diluted share) and $15,689,000 ($.71 per basic and $.70 per
diluted share) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006.
PNOI for the three months increased by $4,427,000, or 18.3%. The increase
was primarily attributable to $1,517,000 from newly developed properties,
$1,395,000 from 2006 and 2007 acquisitions and $1,547,000 from same property
growth. Included in same property growth was $.04 per share in termination fees
for the third quarter of 2007 mainly from one tenant's early termination (this
space has already been re-leased), compared to $.01 per share in the same
quarter of 2006. Without termination fees, the increase in PNOI for the third
quarter would have been $3,631,000.
PNOI for the nine months increased by $10,421,000, or 14.7%. The increase
was primarily attributable to $3,954,000 from newly developed properties,
$3,409,000 from 2006 and 2007 acquisitions and $3,165,000 from same property
growth. Included in same property growth was $.04 per share in termination fees
for the nine months in 2007 mainly from one tenant's early termination (this
space has already been re-leased), compared to $.02 per share in the same period
of 2006. Without termination fees for the nine months, the increase in PNOI
would have been $9,809,000.
Expense to revenue ratios were about the same for both comparative periods.
The Company's percentages leased and occupied were 97.0% and 95.7%,
respectively, at September 30, 2007 compared to 96.3% and 95.6%, respectively,
at September 30, 2006. The increases in PNOI were offset by increased
depreciation and amortization expense and other costs as discussed below.
The following  table presents the  components of interest  expense for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Increase Increase
2007 2006 (Decrease) 2007 2006 (Decrease)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands, except rates of interest)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Average bank borrowings..................................... $ 108,221 107,145 1,076 94,893 116,352 (21,459)
Weighted average variable interest rates.................... 6.48% 6.47% 6.48% 6.04%

VARIABLE RATE INTEREST EXPENSE
Variable rate interest (excluding loan cost amortization)... $ 1,767 1,747 20 4,602 5,256 (654)
Amortization of bank loan costs............................. 88 88 - 266 266 -
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Total variable rate interest expense........................ 1,855 1,835 20 4,868 5,522 (654)
-------------------------------------------------------------------

FIXED RATE INTEREST EXPENSE
Fixed rate interest (excluding loan cost amortization)...... 6,661 5,484 1,177 19,312 16,277 3,035
Amortization of mortgage loan costs......................... 142 115 27 407 343 64
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed rate interest expense........................... 6,803 5,599 1,204 19,719 16,620 3,099
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Total interest.............................................. 8,658 7,434 1,224 24,587 22,142 2,445
Less capitalized interest................................... (1,572) (1,120) (452) (4,425) (3,096) (1,329)
-------------------------------------------------------------------

TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE...................................... $ 7,086 6,314 772 20,162 19,046 1,116
===================================================================
</TABLE>

Interest costs incurred during the period of construction of real estate
properties are capitalized and offset against interest expense. The Company's
weighted average variable interest rates in the first nine months of 2007 were
higher than in 2006; however, average bank borrowings were significantly lower,
thereby reducing variable rate interest expense.
The increase in mortgage interest expense in 2007 was primarily due to the
new mortgages detailed in the table below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NEW MORTGAGES IN 2006 AND 2007 INTEREST RATE DATE AMOUNT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Huntwood and Wiegman Distribution Centers.............. 5.680% 08/08/06 $ 38,000,000
Alamo Downs, Arion 1-15 & 17, Rampart I, II & III,
Santan 10 and World Houston 16....................... 5.970% 10/17/06 78,000,000
Broadway VI, World Houston 1 & 2, 21 & 23, Arion 16,
Ethan Allen, Northpark I-IV, South 55th Avenue,
East University I & II and Santan 10 II.............. 5.570% 08/08/07 75,000,000
------------- -----------------
Weighted Average/Total Amount........................ 5.755% $ 191,000,000
============= =================
</TABLE>

These increases were offset by regularly scheduled principal payments and
the repayments of five mortgages in 2006 and 2007 as shown in the following
table:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
INTEREST DATE PAYOFF
MORTGAGE LOANS REPAID IN 2006 AND 2007 RATE REPAID AMOUNT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Huntwood Distribution Center......................... 7.990% 08/08/06 $ 10,557,000
Wiegman Distribution Center.......................... 7.990% 08/08/06 4,872,000
Arion Business Park.................................. 4.450% 10/16/06 20,500,000
World Houston 1 & 2.................................. 7.770% 04/12/07 4,023,000
E. University I & II, Broadway VI, 55th Avenue
and Ethan Allen.................................... 8.060% 05/25/07 10,197,000
----------- --------------
Weighted Average/Total Amount...................... 6.539% $ 50,149,000
=========== ==============
</TABLE>

Depreciation and amortization for continuing operations increased
$1,804,000 and $4,485,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2006. This increase was
primarily due to properties acquired and transferred from development during
2006 and 2007.
NAREIT has recommended supplemental disclosures concerning straight-line
rent, capital expenditures and leasing costs. Straight-lining of rent for
continuing operations increased income by $263,000 and $670,000 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, compared to $79,000 and
$783,000 in the same periods of 2006.
Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditures for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007
and 2006 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
Estimated --------------------------------------------------
Useful Life 2007 2006 2007 2006
----------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Upgrade on Acquisitions................. 40 yrs $ 32 231 91 339
Tenant Improvements:
New Tenants........................... Lease Life 1,529 1,353 4,843 5,214
New Tenants (first generation) (1).... Lease Life 29 396 404 676
Renewal Tenants....................... Lease Life 793 130 1,623 523
Other:
Building Improvements................. 5-40 yrs 423 441 1,181 1,297
Roofs................................. 5-15 yrs 485 682 1,446 1,169
Parking Lots.......................... 3-5 yrs 141 204 552 299
Other................................. 5 yrs 44 83 96 128
--------------------------------------------------
Total capital expenditures........ $ 3,476 3,520 10,236 9,645
==================================================
</TABLE>
(1) First generation refers to space that has never been occupied under
EastGroup's ownership.

Capitalized Leasing Costs

The Company's leasing costs (principally commissions) are capitalized and
included in Other Assets. The costs are amortized over the terms of the
associated leases and are included in depreciation and amortization expense.
Capitalized leasing costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007
and 2006 were as follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
Estimated --------------------------------------------------
Useful Life 2007 2006 2007 2006
---------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Development............................. Lease Life $ 827 771 2,457 1,530
New Tenants............................. Lease Life 500 583 1,924 1,953
New Tenants (first generation) (1)...... Lease Life 39 37 204 112
Renewal Tenants......................... Lease Life 611 420 1,509 1,362
--------------------------------------------------
Total capitalized leasing costs... $ 1,977 1,811 6,094 4,957
==================================================

Amortization of leasing costs (2)....... $ 1,469 1,150 3,848 3,212
==================================================
</TABLE>
(1) First generation refers to space that has never been occupied under
EastGroup's ownership.
(2) Includes discontinued operations.
Discontinued Operations

The results of operations, including interest expense (if applicable), for
the properties sold or held for sale during the periods reported are shown under
Discontinued Operations on the consolidated income statements. The following
table presents the components of revenue and expense for the properties sold or
held for sale during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006. There were no sales of properties during the first nine months of 2007;
however, the Company recognized deferred gains of $323,000 from previous sales.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
-----------------------------------------
Discontinued Operations 2007 2006 2007 2006
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Income from real estate operations................................... $ 97 494 308 2,008
Operating expenses from real estate operations....................... (25) (138) (71) (600)
-----------------------------------------
Property net operating income from discontinued operations......... 72 356 237 1,408

Depreciation and amortization........................................ (41) (163) (150) (674)
-----------------------------------------

Income from real estate operations................................... 31 193 87 734
Gain on sale of real estate investments............................ 309 7 323 1,091
-----------------------------------------

Income from discontinued operations.................................. $ 340 200 410 1,825
=========================================
</TABLE>

A summary of gains on sale of real estate investments for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 follows:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Date Net Deferred Recognized
Real Estate Properties Location Size Sold Sales Price Basis Gain Gain
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
2006
Madisonville land................... Madisonville, KY 1.2 Acres 01/05/06 $ 804 27 168 609
Senator I & II/Southeast Crossing... Memphis, TN 534,000 SF 03/09/06 14,870 14,466 - 404
Dallas land......................... Dallas, TX 0.1 Acre 03/16/06 66 13 - 53
Lamar Distribution Center I......... Memphis, TN 125,000 SF 06/30/06 2,979 2,951 18 10
Deferred gain recognized from
previous sale................... 15
--------------------------------------------
$ 18,719 17,457 186 1,091
============================================
</TABLE>

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company's financial statements and
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be
taken in a tax return. FIN 48 was effective January 1, 2007. With few
exceptions, the Company's 2003 and earlier tax years are closed for examination
by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities. The adoption of FIN 48 had an
immaterial impact on the Company's overall financial position or results of
operations during the first nine months of 2007.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which provides guidance for
using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 applies
whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be
measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new
circumstances. The provisions of Statement 157 are effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and
interim periods within those fiscal years. EastGroup accounts for its
stock-based compensation costs at fair value on the dates of grant as required
under SFAS No. 123R. Also, as required under SFAS No. 133, the Company accounts
for its interest rate swap cash flow hedge on the Tower Automotive mortgage at
fair value. The Company expects that the adoption of Statement 157 in 2008 will
have little or no impact on its overall financial position or results of
operations.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Net cash provided by operating activities was $67,187,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007. The primary other sources of cash were from
bank borrowings and mortgage note proceeds. The Company distributed $35,471,000
in common and $1,968,000 in preferred stock dividends during the nine months
ended September 30, 2007. Other primary uses of cash were for bank debt
repayments, construction and development of properties, purchases of real
estate, mortgage note repayments and capital improvements at various properties.
Total debt at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 is detailed below.
The Company's bank credit facilities have certain restrictive covenants, and the
Company was in compliance with all of its debt covenants at September 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
September 30, 2007 December 31, 2006
-----------------------------------------
(In thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Mortgage notes payable - fixed rate......... $ 468,908 417,440
Bank notes payable - floating rate.......... 94,652 29,066
-----------------------------------------
Total debt............................... $ 563,560 446,506
=========================================
</TABLE>
The Company has a three-year, $175 million unsecured revolving credit
facility with a group of nine banks that matures in January 2008. The Company
customarily uses this line of credit for acquisitions and developments. The
interest rate on the facility is based on the LIBOR index and varies according
to debt-to-total asset value ratios (as defined in the credit agreement), with
an annual facility fee of 20 basis points. EastGroup's current interest rate
under this facility is LIBOR plus 95 basis points, except that it may be lower
based upon the competitive bid option in the note. The line of credit can be
expanded by $100 million and has a one-year extension at EastGroup's option. At
September 30, 2007, the weighted average interest rate was 5.86% on a balance of
$90,700,000. The interest rate on each tranche is currently reset on a monthly
basis. At November 7, 2007, the balance on this line was comprised of one
tranche of $47 million at 5.71%, and $43.7 million in competitive bid loans at a
weighted average rate of 5.26%.
The Company has a one-year $20 million unsecured revolving credit facility
with PNC Bank, N.A. that matures on November 28, 2007. This credit facility is
customarily used for working capital needs. The interest rate on the facility is
based on LIBOR and varies according to debt-to-total asset value ratios (as
defined in the credit agreement); it is currently LIBOR plus 110 basis points.
At September 30, 2007, the interest rate was 6.22% on $3,952,000.
The Company is currently negotiating the terms to replace the existing
credit facilities mentioned above.
As market conditions permit, EastGroup issues equity, including preferred
equity, and/or employs fixed-rate, nonrecourse first mortgage debt to replace
the short-term bank borrowings.
On August 8, 2007, the Company closed on a $75 million, nonrecourse first
mortgage loan secured by properties containing 1,448,000 square feet. The loan
has a fixed interest rate of 5.57%, a ten-year term and an amortization schedule
of 20 years. The proceeds of this note were used to reduce variable rate bank
borrowings.
During the fourth quarter, the Company expects to receive a condemnation
award, primarily compensation for land in Arion Business Park, of approximately
$3,050,000 with a gain of approximately $2,584,000.

Contractual Obligations
EastGroup's fixed, noncancelable obligations as of December 31, 2006 did
not materially change during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, except
for the increase in bank borrowings and mortgage notes payable discussed above
and the purchase of the properties in Charlotte that were under contract at year
end. In addition, in late March, the Company executed a ten-year lease with
United Stationers Supply Co. for a 404,000 square foot build-to-suit development
in its Southridge Commerce Park in Orlando. The projected cost of this
development is approximately $20 million, and construction began in June 2007
with occupancy projected in the second quarter of 2008. In connection with this
build-to-suit development, EastGroup entered into contracts with United
Stationers to purchase two of its existing properties (278,000 square feet) in
Jacksonville and Tampa, Florida, for approximately $9 million. These
acquisitions are expected to close in mid-2008, in line with completion of the
build-to-suit development.

The Company anticipates that its current cash balance, operating cash
flows, borrowings under its lines of credit, proceeds from new mortgage debt
and/or proceeds from the issuance of equity instruments will be adequate for (i)
operating and administrative expenses, (ii) normal repair and maintenance
expenses at its properties, (iii) debt service obligations, (iv) distributions
to stockholders, (v) capital improvements, (vi) purchases of properties, (vii)
development, and (viii) any other normal business activities of the Company,
both in the short- and long-term.

INFLATION

Most of the Company's leases include scheduled rent increases.
Additionally, most of the Company's leases require the tenants to pay their pro
rata share of operating expenses, including real estate taxes, insurance and
common area maintenance, thereby reducing the Company's exposure to increases in
operating expenses resulting from inflation. In addition, the Company's leases
typically have three to five year terms, which may enable the Company to replace
existing leases with new leases at a higher base if rents on the existing leases
are below the then-existing market rate.
ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

The Company is exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of
its lines of credit and long-term debt maturities. This debt is used to maintain
liquidity and fund capital expenditures and expansion of the Company's real
estate investment portfolio and operations. The Company's objective for interest
rate risk management is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings
and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its
objectives, the Company borrows at fixed rates but also has several variable
rate bank lines as discussed under Liquidity and Capital Resources. The table
below presents the principal payments due and weighted average interest rates
for both the fixed rate and variable rate debt.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Oct-Dec
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Thereafter Total Fair Value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Fixed rate debt(1) (in thousands)... $ 3,539 15,098 45,411 14,062 80,426 310,372 468,908 467,391(2)
Weighted average interest rate...... 6.18% 6.17% 6.57% 5.95% 7.00% 5.74% 6.06%
Variable rate debt (in thousands)... $ 3,952 90,700 - - - - 94,652 94,652
Weighted average interest rate...... 6.22% 5.86% - - - - 5.88%
</TABLE>

(1) The fixed rate debt shown above includes the Tower Automotive mortgage,
which has a variable interest rate based on the one-month LIBOR. EastGroup has
an interest rate swap agreement that fixes the rate at 4.03% for the 8-year
term. Interest and related fees result in an annual effective interest rate of
5.3%.
(2) The fair value of the Company's fixed rate debt is estimated based on the
quoted market prices for similar issues or by discounting expected cash flows at
the rates currently offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining
maturities, as advised by the Company's bankers.

As the table above incorporates only those exposures that existed as of
September 30, 2007, it does not consider those exposures or positions that could
arise after that date. The ultimate impact of interest rate fluctuations on the
Company will depend on the exposures that arise during subsequent periods. If
the weighted average interest rate on the variable rate bank debt as shown above
changes by 10% or approximately 59 basis points, interest expense and cash flows
would increase or decrease by approximately $557,000 annually.
The Company has an interest rate swap agreement to hedge its exposure to
the variable interest rate on the Company's $9,710,000 Tower Automotive Center
recourse mortgage, which is summarized in the table below. Under the swap
agreement, the Company effectively pays a fixed rate of interest over the term
of the agreement without the exchange of the underlying notional amount. This
swap is designated as a cash flow hedge and is considered to be fully effective
in hedging the variable rate risk associated with the Tower mortgage loan.
Changes in the fair value of the swap are recognized in accumulated other
comprehensive income. The Company does not hold or issue this type of derivative
contract for trading or speculative purposes.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Current Maturity Fair Value Fair Value
Type of Hedge Notional Amount Date Reference Rate Fixed Rate at 9/30/07 at 12/31/06
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(In thousands) (In thousands)
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Swap $9,710 12/31/10 1 month LIBOR 4.03% $146 $314
</TABLE>

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Company's assumptions and financial projections in this report are
based upon "forward-looking" information and are being made pursuant to the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to known and unknown risks and
uncertainties, many of which the Company cannot predict, including, without
limitation: changes in general economic conditions; the extent of tenant
defaults or of any early lease terminations; the Company's ability to lease or
re-lease space at current or anticipated rents; changes in the supply of and
demand for industrial/warehouse properties; increases in interest rate levels;
increases in operating costs; the availability of financing; natural disasters,
terrorism, riots and acts of war and the Company's ability to obtain adequate
insurance; changes in governmental regulation, tax rates and similar matters;
and other risks associated with the development and acquisition of properties,
including risks that development projects may not be completed on schedule or
that development or operating costs may be greater than anticipated. Although
the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking
statements are based upon reasonable assumptions at the time made, the Company
can give no assurance that such expectations will be achieved. The Company
assumes no obligation whatsoever to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements. See also the Company's reports to be filed from time
to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(i) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September
30, 2007, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective in
timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including
its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company's periodic
SEC filings.

(ii) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting during the Company's third fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in EastGroup's
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

(a) Form 10-Q Exhibits:

(31) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications (pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

(a) David H. Hoster II, Chief Executive Officer

(b) N. Keith McKey, Chief Financial Officer

(32) Section 1350 Certifications (pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

(a) David H. Hoster II, Chief Executive Officer

(b) N. Keith McKey, Chief Financial Officer


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 7, 2007

EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.

By: /s/ BRUCE CORKERN
--------------------------
Bruce Corkern, CPA
Senior Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer


By: /s/ N. KEITH MCKEY
--------------------------
N. Keith McKey, CPA
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary