Expeditors International - 10-Q quarterly report FY

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002

OR

For the transition period from               to

Commission File Number: 0-13468

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(206) 674-3400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

                Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  ý        No  o

                At August 7, 2002, the number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s Common Stock was 103,975,113.

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Certain 2001 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2002 presentation.

3

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Certain 2001 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2002 presentation.

4

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

                The attached condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. As a result, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted.  The Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.  The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented.  Certain 2001 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2002 presentation. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about April 1, 2002.

Note 2.  Comprehensive Income

                Comprehensive income consists of net income and other gains and losses affecting shareholders’ equity that, under generally accepted accounting principles, are excluded from net income.  For the Company, these consist of foreign currency translation gains and losses, net of related income tax effects.

                The components of total comprehensive income for interim periods are presented in the following table:

Note 3.  Business Segment Information

                Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” establishes standards for the way that public companies report selected information about segments in their financial statements.

                The Company is organized functionally in geographic operating segments.  Accordingly, management focuses its attention on revenues, net revenues, operating income, identifiable assets, capital expenditures, depreciation and amortization and equity generated in each of these geographical areas when evaluating the effectiveness of geographic management.  The Company charges its subsidiaries and affiliates for services rendered in the United States on a cost recovery basis.  Transactions among the Company’s various offices are conducted using the same arms-length pricing methodologies the Company uses when its offices transact business with independent agents.

5

                Financial information regarding the Company’s operations by geographic area for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 are as follows:

Certain 2001 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2002 presentation.

6

Note 4.  Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share

                The following table reconciles the numerator and the denominator of the basic and diluted per share computations for earnings per share for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001:

Options to purchase 76,600 shares of common stock at exercise prices of $31.93 to $34.30 per share were outstanding during the second quarter of 2002, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares.  The options, which expire on or before June 28, 2012, were still outstanding at June 30, 2002.

Note 5.  New Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” effective July 1, 2001, and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Under the new rules, purchased goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives will no longer be amortized but will be subject to annual impairment tests in accordance with the provisions of the statements. Intangible assets with estimable useful lives will continue to be amortized over their respective useful lives, and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Assets to Be Disposed Of”.  The Company applied the new rules on

7

accounting for goodwill and intangible assets beginning in the first quarter of 2002. Application of the non-amortization provisions of the statement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements. The Company performed the required impairment tests of goodwill as of January 1, 2002 and determined there is no impact on the earnings and financial position of the Company.

In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” which addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and for the associated asset retirement costs. The standard applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction or development and/or normal use of the asset. The Company is required and plans to adopt the provisions of SFAS No. 143 beginning in the first quarter of 2003.  Management does not anticipate that adoption of SFAS No. 143 will result in a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

In October 2001, SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” was issued which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. While this standard supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of”, it retains many of the fundamental provisions of that standard. SFAS No. 144 also supersedes the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations ¾Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions”, for the disposal of a segment of a business. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 144 beginning in the first quarter of 2002.  Adoption of SFAS No. 144 had no impact on the earnings and financial position of the Company.

In November 2001, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the FASB issued staff announcement EITF D-103 “Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for ‘Out of Pocket’ Expenses Incurred.”  This staff announcement clarified certain provisions of EITF 99-19 “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent”, and among other things established when reimbursements are required to be shown gross as opposed to net.  EITF D-103 also directed that the new rules should be applied in financial reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2001.  Beginning in the first quarter of 2002, the Company has complied with the guidance in EITF D-103.  Prior to the adoption of EITF D-103, the Company recorded such reimbursements on a net basis.  The Company has reclassified amounts in the 2001 presentation to conform with the current presentation.

Note 6.  Stock and Cash Dividends

        On May 8, 2002, the Board of Directors declared a 2-for-1 stock split, effected in the form of a stock dividend of one share of common stock for every share outstanding, and increased the authorized common stock to 320 million shares.  The stock dividend was distributed on June 24, 2002 to shareholders of record on June 10, 2002. All share and per share information, except par value, has been adjusted for all periods to reflect the stock split.

        On May 8, 2002, the Board of Directors declared a semi-annual cash dividend of $.06 per share payable on June 17, 2002 to shareholders of record as of June 3, 2002.  The dividend of $6.2 million was paid on June 17, 2002.

        On May 9, 2001, the Board of Directors declared a semi-annual cash dividend of $.05 per share payable on June 15, 2001 to shareholders of record as of June 1, 2001.  The dividend of $5.3 million was paid on June 15, 2001.

8

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

SAFE HARBOR FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS UNDER SECURITIES LITIGATION
                REFORM ACT OF 1995; CERTAIN CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS

                Certain portions of this report on Form 10-Q including the section entitled “Currency and Other Risk Factors” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” contain forward-looking statements which must be considered in connection with the discussion of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements.  In addition to risk factors identified elsewhere in this report, attention should be given to the factors identified and discussed in the report on Form 10-K filed on or about April 1, 2002.

GENERAL

                Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. is engaged in the business of providing global logistics services, including international freight forwarding and consolidation, for both air and ocean freight.  The Company also acts as a customs broker in all domestic offices, and in many of its overseas offices.  The Company also provides additional services for its customers including value added distribution, purchase order management, vendor consolidation and other logistics solutions.  The Company offers domestic forwarding services only in conjunction with international shipments.  The Company does not compete for overnight courier or small parcel business.  The Company does not own or operate aircraft or steamships.

                International trade is influenced by many factors, including economic and political conditions in the United States and abroad, currency exchange rates, and United States and foreign laws and policies relating to tariffs, trade restrictions, foreign investments and taxation.  Periodically, governments consider a variety of changes to current tariffs and trade restrictions.  The Company cannot predict which, if any, of these proposals may be adopted, nor can the Company predict the effects adoption of any such proposal will have on the Company’s business.  Doing business in foreign locations also subjects the Company to a variety of risks and considerations not normally encountered by domestic enterprises. In addition to being affected by governmental policies concerning international trade, the Company’s business may also be affected by political developments and changes in government personnel or policies in the nations in which it does business.

                The Company’s ability to provide service to its customers is highly dependent on good working relationships with a variety of entities including airlines, steamship lines, and governmental agencies.  The Company considers its current working relationships with these entities to be good.  However, changes in space allotments available from carriers, governmental deregulation efforts, “modernization” of the regulations governing customs clearance, and/or changes in governmental quota restrictions could affect the Company’s business in unpredictable ways.

                Historically, the Company’s operating results have been subject to a seasonal trend when measured on a quarterly basis.  The first quarter has traditionally been the weakest and the third and fourth quarters have traditionally been the strongest.  This pattern is the result of, or is influenced by, numerous factors including climate, national holidays, consumer demand, economic conditions and a myriad of other similar and subtle forces.  In addition, this historical quarterly trend has been influenced by the growth and diversification of the Company’s international network and service offerings.  The Company cannot accurately forecast many of these factors nor can the Company estimate accurately the relative influence of any particular factor and, as a result, there can be no assurance that historical patterns, if any, will continue in future periods.

                A significant portion of the Company’s revenues are derived from customers in industries whose shipping patterns are tied closely to consumer demand, and from customers in industries whose shipping patterns are dependent upon just-in-time production schedules. Therefore, the timing of the Company’s revenues are, to a large degree, impacted by factors out of the Company’s control, such as shifting consumer demand for retail goods and/or manufacturing production delays. Additionally, many customers ship a significant portion of their goods at or near the end of a quarter, and therefore, the Company may not learn of a shortfall in revenues until late in a quarter.  To the extent that a shortfall in revenues or earnings was not expected by securities analysts, any such shortfall from levels predicted by securities analysts could have an immediate and adverse effect on the trading price of the Company’s stock.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

                Management believes that the nature of the Company’s business is such that there are few, if any, complex challenges in accounting for operations.  While judgments and estimates are a necessary component of any system of accounting, the Company’s use of estimates is limited primarily to the areas of accounts receivable valuation, the useful lives of long-term assets and the accrual of costs related to ancillary services the Company provides—areas that in the aggregate are not a major component of the Company’s statement of earnings.  In addition, certain undistributed earnings of the Company’s subsidiaries accumulated through December 31, 1992 would, under most circumstances, be subject to some additional United States income tax if distributed to the Company.  The

9

Company has not provided for this additional tax because the Company intends to reinvest such earnings to fund the expansion of its foreign activities, or to distribute them in a manner in which no significant additional taxes would be incurred.  Management believes that the methods utilized in all of these areas are non-aggressive in approach and consistent in application.  Management believes that there are limited, if any, alternative accounting principles or methods which could be applied to the Company’s transactions.  While the use of estimates means that actual future results may be different from those contemplated by the estimates, the Company believes that alternative principles and methods used for making such estimates would not produce materially different results than those reported.

In November 2001, the EITF of the FASB issued staff announcement EITF D-103 “Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for ‘Out of Pocket’ Expenses Incurred.”  This staff announcement clarified certain provisions of EITF 99-19 “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent”, and among other things established when reimbursements are required to be shown gross as opposed to net.  EITF D-103 also directed that the new rules should be applied in financial reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2001.  The clarifying rules now require the Company to henceforth report certain reimbursed incidental activities on a gross rather than net basis.  Beginning in the first quarter of 2002, the Company has complied with the guidance in EITF D-103.

The following schedule shows the financial statement impact of the adoption by comparing the net amounts in the report on Form 10Q filed on or about August 14, 2001, with the gross amounts reported in this current 10Q.  There is no impact on net revenue, nor is there any impact on operating income or net earnings as a result of this change.

10

Results of Operations

                The following table shows the consolidated net revenues (revenues less transportation expenses) attributable to the Company’s principal services and the Company’s expenses for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, expressed as percentages of net revenues.  Management believes that net revenues are a better measure than total revenues of the relative importance of the Company’s principal services since total revenues earned by the Company as a freight consolidator include the carriers’ charges to the Company for carrying the shipment whereas revenues earned by the Company in its other capacities include only the commissions and fees actually earned by the Company.

                The table and the accompanying discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto which appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.

                Airfreight net revenues remained constant and decreased 2% for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002, respectively, as compared with the same periods for 2001.  These decreases in airfreight net revenues were due primarily to a decline in airfreight yields during the second quarter of 2002 as compared with the same period of 2001, despite marked increases in overall airfreight tonnages.  This decline in airfreight yields is a result of supply and demand issues, and air carriers raisings rates faster than the Company could commercially pass these rate increases on to its customers.  Management believes that the decline in airfreight yields is a result of the short-term market pressures brought about by market demand for airfreight exceeding available carrier capacity, and does not reflect any loss of the Company’s market share.

                Ocean freight and ocean services net revenues increased 16% for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002, as compared with the same period for 2001.  The Company continued to aggressively market competitive ocean freight rates primarily on freight moving eastbound from the Far East. Management also has embarked on a strategy to improve market share on trade lanes other than eastbound from the Far East.  The ocean forwarding business and ECMS (Expeditors Cargo Management Systems), the Company’s ocean freight consolidation management and purchase order tracking service, were again instrumental in helping the Company to expand market share.

11

                Customs brokerage and import services net revenues increased 6% and 2% for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002, as compared with the same periods for 2001. Management estimates that the Company performs customs clearance services for approximately 70-75% of the freight that it carries.  These relatively small increases in customs brokerage and import services were consistent with the Company’s focus on profitable business, as opposed to high volume, no margin business.  In addition, more door-to-door business creates situations where the distinction between brokerage revenue and transportation revenue becomes increasingly subjective.

                Salaries and related costs increased 5% and 3% for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 compared with the same periods in 2001 as a result of (1) the Company’s increased, albeit limited, hiring of sales, operations, and administrative personnel in existing and new offices to accommodate increases in business activity, and (2) increased compensation levels.  Salaries and related costs as a percentage of net revenues remained constant for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002, as compared with the same periods in 2001.  The relatively consistent relationship between salaries and net revenues is the result of a compensation philosophy that has been maintained since the inception of the Company: offer a modest base salary and the opportunity to share in a fixed and determinable percentage of the operating profit of the business unit controlled by each key employee.  Using this compensation model, changes in individual compensation will occur in proportion to changes in Company profits. Management believes that the Company’s historical growth in revenues, net revenues and net earnings for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 are a result of the incentives inherent in the Company’s compensation program.

                Other operating expenses increased 2% and decreased 2% for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002, as compared with the same periods in 2001.  The decrease noted in the six months ended June 30, 2002, was primarily attributed to cost containment objectives initiated in the prior year.  The results of these cost containment measures were substantially lower costs for travel and entertainment, office and computer supplies and miscellaneous expense during the six months ended June 30, 2002.  Other operating expenses as a percentage of net revenues decreased 1% for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002, as compared with the same periods in 2001, as the Company leveraged net revenue increases over other operating expenses with a largely fixed or fixed-variable cost component.

                Other income, net, decreased for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002, as compared with the same periods in 2001.  Due to much lower interest rates on higher average cash balances and short-term investments during 2002, interest income decreased by $1 million and $2.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively.  The decrease in interest income during the six months ended June 30, 2002, was offset by a $1.5 million gain on the sale of the Company’s former Dublin, Ireland facility.

                The Company pays income taxes in the United States and other jurisdictions, as well as other taxes which are typically included in costs of operations. The Company’s consolidated effective income tax rate during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002, decreased slightly from 37.5% to 37.1% and 37.6% to 37%, respectively, as compared with the same periods in 2001.  The decreases were caused primarily by a reduction in state tax expense required to be paid by the Company.

Currency and Other Risk Factors

                International air/ocean freight forwarding and customs brokerage are intensively competitive and are expected to remain so for the foreseeable future. There are a large number of entities competing in the international logistics industry; however, the Company’s primary competition is confined to a relatively small number of companies within this group. While there is currently a marked trend within the industry toward consolidation into large firms with multinational offices and agency networks, regional and local broker/forwarders remain a competitive force.

                Historically, the primary competitive factors in the international logistics industry have been price and quality of service, including reliability, responsiveness, expertise, convenience, and scope of operations.  The Company emphasizes quality service and believes that its prices are competitive with those of others in the industry.  Recently, customers have exhibited a trend towards more sophisticated and efficient procedures for the management of the logistics supply chain by embracing strategies such as just-in-time inventory management.  Accordingly, sophisticated computerized customer service capabilities and a stable worldwide network have become significant factors in attracting and retaining customers.

                Developing these systems and a worldwide network has added a considerable indirect cost to the services provided to customers.  Smaller and middle-tier competitors, in general, do not have the resources available to develop customized systems and a worldwide network.  As a result, there is a significant amount of consolidation currently taking place in the industry.  Management expects that this trend toward consolidation will continue for the short- to medium-term.

                The nature of the Company’s worldwide operations necessitates the Company dealing with a multitude of currencies other than the U.S. Dollar.  This results in the Company being exposed to the inherent risks of the international currency markets and

12

governmental interference.  Some of the countries where the Company maintains offices and/or agency relationships have strict currency control regulations which influence the Company’s ability to hedge foreign currency exposure.  The Company tries to compensate for these exposures by accelerating international currency settlements among its offices or agents.  The Company enters into foreign currency hedging transactions only in limited locations where there are regulatory or commercial limitations on the Company’s ability to move money freely around the world or the short-term financial outlook in any country is such that hedging is the most time-sensitive way to avoid short-term exchange losses.  Any such hedging activity during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001 was insignificant.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, the Company had approximately $45,000 in foreign exchange gains and $114,000 in foreign exchange losses on a net basis, respectively.  In the same periods of 2001, the Company had foreign currency losses of approximately $8,000 and foreign currency gains of approximately $438,000 on a net basis.

                The Company has traditionally generated revenues from airfreight, ocean freight and customs brokerage and import services.  In light of the customer-driven trend to provide customer rates on a door-to-door basis, management foresees the potential, in the medium to long-term, for fees normally associated with customs house brokerage to be de-emphasized and included as a component of other services offered by the Company.

                On January 1, 1999, eleven of fifteen member countries of the European Union, later joined by Greece in January 2001, established fixed conversion rates between their existing currencies (“legacy currencies”) and a new common currency - the Euro.  The Euro trades on currency exchanges and may be used in business transactions.  The conversion to the Euro eliminates currency exchange rate risk between the member countries.  Beginning in January 2002, new Euro-denominated bills and coins were issued and legacy currencies began to be withdrawn from circulation. The Company has worked diligently to address the issues raised by the Euro currency conversion including the need to adapt computer systems and business processes to accommodate Euro-denominated transactions.  The conversion costs were not material.  Due to numerous uncertainties, the Company is evaluating the effects one common European currency will have on pricing.  The Company is unable to predict the resulting impact, if any, on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.  The Company has not experienced any significant disruption as a result of this phased conversion.

Sources of Growth

                Acquisitions - Historically, growth through aggressive acquisition has proven to be a challenge for many of the Company’s competitors and typically involves the purchase of significant “goodwill”, the value of which can be realized in large measure only by retaining the customers and profit margins of the acquired business. As a result, the Company has pursued a strategy emphasizing organic growth supplemented by certain strategic acquisitions, where future economic benefit significantly exceeds the “goodwill” recorded in the transaction.

                Office Openings - The Company did not open any offices during the second quarter of 2002.

                Internal Growth - Management believes that a comparison of “same store” growth is critical in the evaluation of the quality and extent of the Company’s internally generated growth. This “same store” analysis isolates the financial contributions from offices that have been included in the Company’s operating results for at least one full year.   The table below presents “same store” comparisons for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 (which is the measure of any increase from the same period of 2001) and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2001 (which measures growth over 2000).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

                The Company’s principal source of liquidity is cash generated from operating activities.  Net cash provided by operating activities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, was approximately $23 million and $67 million, as compared with $55 million and $118 million for the same periods of 2001.  This $32 million and $51 million decrease is principally due to a $43 million and $47 million increase in accounts receivable offset by a $37 million and $52 million increase in accounts payable during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, as compared to a $21 million and $58 million decrease in accounts receivable offset by a $9 million increase and $2 million decrease in accounts payable for the same periods in 2001.

                The Company’s business is subject to seasonal fluctuations.  Cash flow fluctuates as a result of this seasonality.  Historically, the first quarter shows an excess of customer collections over customer billings.  This results in positive cash flow.  The increased activity associated with peak season (typically commencing late second or early third quarter) causes an excess of customer billings

13

over customer collections.  This cyclical growth in customer receivables consumes available cash.  In the past, the Company has utilized short-term borrowings to satisfy normal operating expenditures when temporary cash outflows exceed cash inflows.  These short-term borrowings have been repaid when the trend reverses and customer collections exceed customer billings.

                As a customs broker, the Company makes significant 5-10 business day cash advances for the payment of duties and freight.  These advances are made as an accommodation for a select group of credit-worthy customers.  Cash advances are a “pass through” and are not recorded as a component of revenue and expense.  The billings of such advances to customers are accounted for as a direct increase in accounts receivable and accounts payable.  As a result of these “pass through” billings, the conventional Days Sales Outstanding or DSO calculation does not directly measure collection efficiency.

                Cash used in investing activities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, were $8 million and $9 million, as compared with $15 million and $22 million during the same periods of 2001.  The largest use of cash in investing activities is cash paid for capital expenditures.  In the second quarter of 2002, the Company made capital expenditures of $5 million as compared with $11 million for the same period in 2001.  Capital expenditures in 2002 and 2001 related primarily to investments in technology and office furniture and equipment.  Capital expenditures were offset by proceeds from the sale of property and equipment of $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002, as compared with $0.2 million for the same period in 2001.  This increase in proceeds is substantially due to the Company’s sale of its former Dublin, Ireland facility during the first quarter of 2002.

                Cash used in financing activities during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 were $10 million and $7 million as compared with $8 million and $7 million for the same periods in 2001.  During the second quarter of 2002, the Company paid down short-term debt by $1.7 million, as compared with a pay down of short-term debt by $0.3 million that occurred during the same period of 2001.  The Company uses the proceeds from stock option exercises to repurchase the Company’s stock on the open market.  The differences shown at the end of the second quarter of 2002 and 2001 between proceeds from the issuance of common stock and the amounts paid to repurchase common stock represent a timing difference in the receipt of proceeds and the subsequent repurchase of outstanding shares.

                At June 30, 2002, working capital was $284.9 million, including cash and short-term investments of $273.3 million.  The Company had no long-term debt at June 30, 2002.  While the nature of its business does not require an extensive investment in property and equipment, the Company cannot eliminate the possibility that it could acquire an equity interest in property in certain geographic locations.  The Company currently expects to spend approximately $40 million on property and equipment in all of 2002.  In addition to normal capital expenditures for leasehold improvements, warehouse equipment, computer hardware and furniture and fixtures, this total includes estimates for a building project in Egypt.  The Company expects to fund capital expenditures in 2002, with cash.

                The Company borrows under unsecured bank lines of credit.   At June 30, 2002, the bank lines of credit totaled $10.2 million.  In addition, the Company maintains a bank facility with its U.K. bank for $7.6 million.  At June 30, 2002, the Company was directly liable for $0.3 million drawn on these lines of credit and was contingently liable for an additional $31.5 million from standby letters of credit and guarantees related to these lines of credit and other obligations.

                Management believes that the Company’s current cash position, bank financing arrangements, and operating cash flows will be sufficient to meet its capital and liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future.

                In some cases, the Company’s ability to repatriate funds from foreign operations may be subject to foreign exchange controls.  At June 30, 2002, cash and cash equivalent balances of $125.3 million were held by the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries, of which $49.4 million was held in banks in the United States.  In addition, certain undistributed earnings of the Company’s subsidiaries accumulated through December 31, 1992 would, under most circumstances, be subject to some additional United States income tax if distributed to the Company.  Such undistributed earnings are approximately $14.9 million and the additional Federal and state taxes payable in a hypothetical distribution of such accumulated earnings would approximate $10.1 million.  The Company has not provided for this additional tax because the Company intends to reinvest such earnings to fund the expansion of its foreign activities, or to distribute them in a manner in which no significant additional taxes would be incurred.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

                The Company is exposed to market risks in the ordinary course of its business. These risks are primarily related to foreign exchange risk and changes in short-term interest rates. The potential impact of the Company’s exposure to these risks is presented below:

14

Foreign Exchange Risk

                The Company conducts business in many different countries and currencies. The Company’s business often results in revenue billings issued in a country and currency which differs from that where the expenses related to the service are incurred. In the ordinary course of business, the Company creates numerous intercompany transactions.  This brings a market risk to the Company’s earnings.

                Foreign exchange rate sensitivity analysis can be quantified by estimating the impact on the Company’s earnings as a result of hypothetical changes in the value of the U.S. Dollar, the Company’s functional currency, relative to the other currencies in which the Company transacts business.  All other things being equal, an average 10% weakening of the U.S. Dollar, throughout the six months ended June 30, 2002, would have had the effect of raising operating income approximately $4.3 million.  An average 10% strengthening of the U.S. Dollar, for the same period, would have had the effect of reducing operating income approximately $3.5 million.

                The Company has approximately $4 million of intercompany transactions unsettled at any one point in time.  The Company currently does not use derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency risk.  The Company instead follows a policy of accelerating international currency settlements to manage foreign exchange risk relative to intercompany billings.  The majority of intercompany billings are resolved within 30 days and intercompany billings arising in the normal course of business are fully settled within 90 days.

Interest Rate Risk

                At June 30, 2002, the Company had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $273.3 million and short-term borrowings of $0.3 million, all subject to variable short-term interest rates.  A hypothetical change in the interest rate of 10% would have an immaterial impact on the Company’s earnings.

                In management’s opinion, there has been no material change in the Company’s market risk exposure in the second quarter of 2002.

15

EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL OF WASHINGTON, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

                The Company is ordinarily involved in claims and lawsuits which arise in the normal course of business, none of which currently, in management’s opinion, will have a significant effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

(a)           The annual meeting of the Shareholders was held on May 8, 2002.

(b)           The following directors were elected to the Board of Directors to serve a term of one year and until their successors are elected and qualified: