UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
This combined Form 10-Q is separately filed by Alliant Energy Corporation, Interstate Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Power and Light Company. Information contained in the Form 10-Q relating to Interstate Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Power and Light Company is filed by such registrant on its own behalf. Each of Interstate Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Power and Light Company makes no representation as to information relating to registrants other than itself.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ]
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
The accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
2
ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
3
ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
4
ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
5
6
7
8
9
Alliant Energy Corporation Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003
10
Alliant Energy Corporation Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2004
11
Alliant Energy Corporation Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2003
12
Alliant Energy Corporation Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003
13
INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
14
INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
15
INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
16
INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
17
18
19
WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
20
WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
21
WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED) (Continued)
22
WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
23
24
25
The primary first tier subsidiaries of Alliant Energy include: IP&L, WP&L, Resources and Corporate Services. Among various other regulatory constraints, Alliant Energy is operating as a registered public utility holding company subject to the limitations imposed by PUHCA. This MD&A includes information relating to Alliant Energy, IP&L and WP&L (as well as Resources and Corporate Services). Where appropriate, information relating to a specific entity has been segregated and labeled as such. The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report as well as the financial statements, notes and MD&A included in Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls latest combined Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Statements contained in this report that are not of historical fact are forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such statements. Some, but not all, of the risks and uncertainties include: weather effects on sales and revenues; economic and political conditions in Alliant Energys domestic and international service territories; federal, state and international regulatory or governmental actions, including the impact of potential energy-related legislation in Congress, the ability to obtain adequate and timely rate relief to allow for, among other things, the recovery of operating costs and the earning of reasonable rates of return in current and future rate proceedings, including achieving an appropriate level of interim rates in IP&Ls current Iowa electric case, as well as the payment of expected levels of dividends; unanticipated construction and acquisition expenditures; unanticipated issues or delays in connection with Alliant Energys construction of new generating facilities; issues related to the supply of purchased electricity and price thereof, including the ability to recover purchased-power and fuel costs in a timely manner through rates; issues related to electric transmission, including recovery of costs incurred, and federal legislation and regulation affecting such transmission; risks related to the operations of Alliant Energys nuclear facilities and unanticipated issues relating to the pending sale of Alliant Energys interest in Kewaunee; costs associated with Alliant Energys environmental remediation efforts and with environmental compliance generally; developments that adversely impact Alliant Energys ability to implement its strategic plan; the amount of premiums incurred in connection with Alliant Energys planned debt reductions; improved results from Alliant Energys Brazil investments in 2004 compared to prior years; improved results from Alliant Energys other non-regulated businesses as a whole; stable foreign exchange rates; no material permanent declines in the fair market value of, or expected cash flows from, Alliant Energys investments; Alliant Energys ability to continue cost controls and operational efficiencies; Alliant Energys ability to identify and successfully complete proposed acquisitions and development projects; access to technological developments; employee workforce factors, including changes in key executives, collective bargaining agreements or work stoppages; continued access to the capital markets; the ability to successfully complete ongoing tax audits and appeals with no material impact on Alliant Energys earnings or cash flows; inflation rates; and factors listed in Other Matters Other Future Considerations. Alliant Energy assumes no obligation, and disclaims any duty, to update the forward-looking statements in this report.
Alliant Energys domestic utility business is its core business and the sole growth platform within its strategic plan. The strategic plan is concentrated on building and maintaining the generation and infrastructure necessary to provide Alliant Energys domestic utility customers with safe, reliable and environmentally sound energy service. Alliant Energys strategic plan also includes focusing on the profitability and cash flows of its remaining non-regulated businesses which will serve as ongoing business platforms. The following is an update related to recent activities of Alliant Energys domestic utility generation plan announced in December 2003:
26
A summary of the regulatory environment is included in the combined Form 10-K filed by Alliant Energy, IP&L and WP&L for the year ended Dec. 31, 2003. Set forth below are recent developments relating to the regulatory environment.
Details of Alliant Energys rate cases impacting its historical and future results of operations are as follows (dollars in millions):
Interim rate relief is implemented, subject to refund, pending determination of final rates. The final rate relief granted replaces the amount of interim rate relief granted.
Since the final increase was lower than the interim relief granted, a refund to customers was made in 2003.
IP&L requested interim rate relief of approximately $106 million. The Office of Consumer Advocate, a Division of the Iowa Department of Justice responsible for representing the interests of Iowa utility customers before the IUB, has recommended that the IUB approve an increase not in excess of $95.8 million. Under IUB procedures, IP&L expects an interim rate order to be issued in June 2004.
In April 2004, a final rate order for a $0.2 million increase was received. Since the final increase was lower than the interim relief granted, a refund to customers will likely be made in 2004. IP&L has fully reserved for the potential refund as of March 31, 2004. Also in April 2004, IP&L filed a request for reconsideration. Under Minnesota law, the final order previously issued by the MPUC has been suspended in light of the reconsideration request. The MPUC is expected to act on the reconsideration within 30 days, at which time it will issue a decision either granting or denying IP&Ls request.
With the exception of recovering a return on IP&Ls Emery plant, which is a large component of IP&Ls retail Iowa electric rate case filed in March 2004, a significant portion of the rate increases included in the previous table reflect the recovery of increased costs incurred by IP&L and WP&L, or costs they expect to incur, thus the increase in revenues related to these rate increases have not resulted or are not expected to result in a corresponding increase in net income.
In March 2004, a new ratemaking law was enacted in Iowa. The new law allows utilities to place in effect interim rates, subject to refund, without review by the IUB within ten days of filing a general rate increase request. The law also allows the IUB to consider known and measurable changes in costs and revenues occurring within nine months from the end of the historical test year in setting final rates in a rate case. Both of these changes are designed to mitigate regulatory lag in Iowa ratemaking, which uses a historical versus projected test year in setting rates. IP&L does not expect this new law to have any impact on its pending retail electric rate case in Iowa as it is only expected to impact future Iowa rate cases.
27
Unless otherwise noted, all per share references in the Results of Operations section refer to earnings perdiluted share.
Overview First Quarter Results Alliant Energys net income (loss) and EPS for the first quarter were as follows (dollars in millions; totals may not foot due to rounding):
The increase in domestic utility income from continuing operations was primarily due to higher electric margins, which were partially offset by higher utility operating expenses. The significant improvement in Alliant Energys non-regulated results from continuing operations was primarily due to improved results from its International business unit.
Domestic Utility Electric Margins Electric margins and MWh sales for Alliant Energy for the three months ended March 31 were as follows (in thousands):
Electric margins increased $23.1 million, or 9%, primarily due to the impact of various rate increases implemented during the last 12 months, which included increased revenues to recover a significant portion of higher utility operating expenses, the impact on the comparison of a significant under recovery of purchased-power and fuel costs at WP&L in the first quarter of 2003 and increased retail sales resulting from continued customer and other sales growth. These items were partially offset by the impact of seasonal rates at WP&L, implemented for the first time in April 2003, and slightly milder weather in the first quarter of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. Electric margins for the first quarter of 2004 were also negatively impacted by higher than anticipated fuel and purchased-power costs at WP&L. WP&L filed a fuel-only rate case in the first quarter of 2004 and an interim rate increase of approximately $16 million was implemented in late March 2004.
In April 2003, WP&L implemented seasonal electric rates that are designed to result in higher rates for the peak demand period from June 1 through Sept. 30 and lower rates in all other periods during each calendar year. As a result, total annual revenues are not expected to be impacted significantly. However, the first quarter of 2004 margins were approximately $7 million lower than the same period in 2003, all other things being equal, given the seasonal rates were not yet effective in the first quarter of 2003.
28
Domestic Utility Gas Margins Gas margins and Dth sales for Alliant Energy for the three months ended March 31 were as follows (in thousands):
Gas margins decreased $5.4 million, or 8%, primarily due to lower sales, which were partially due to milder weather conditions in the first quarter of 2004 compared with the same period in 2003, and the impact of final Iowa retail gas rates effective in August 2003 being lower than interim rates that were in effect in the first quarter of 2003. These items were partially offset by improved results of $2 million from WP&Ls performance-based commodity cost recovery program (benefits are shared by ratepayers and shareowners).
Refer to Rates and Regulatory Matters for discussion of various electric and gas rate filings.
Non-regulated Revenues Details regarding Alliant Energys non-regulated revenues for the three months ended March 31 were as follows (in thousands):
The decreased Integrated Services revenues were primarily due to decreased gas revenues at Alliant Energys natural gas marketing business, NG Energy Trading, LLC, including reduced sales opportunities as a result of less volatility in gas prices and lower natural gas prices. The increased International revenues were primarily due to the acquisition of an additional combined heat and power facility in China in the second quarter of 2003.
Other Operating Expenses Other operation and maintenance expense for the domestic utilities increased $7.2 million, largely due to increases in employee and retiree benefits (comprised of compensation, medical and pension costs).
Non-regulated operation and maintenance expenses for the three months ended March 31 were as follows (in thousands):
The Integrated Services and International variances were largely driven by the same factors impacting the revenue variances discussed previously. The International increase was also impacted by higher coal costs for its generating facilities in China, partially offset by lower compensation expense.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased $5.4 million, primarily due to utility property additions, partially offset by lower software amortization at WP&L.
Interest Expense and Other Interest expense decreased $11.0 million primarily due to lower average borrowings as a result of debt retirements during the last 12 months, and credit facility fees incurred at Resources in 2003.
29
Loss on early extinguishment of debt in the first quarter of 2004 includes debt repayment premiums and charges for the unamortized debt expenses related to long-term debt retirements of $20 million of senior notes at Resources.
Equity (income) loss from Alliant Energys unconsolidated investments for the three months ended March 31 was as follows (in thousands):
Equity income from unconsolidated investments increased $20.9 million. The improved results for Brazil were primarily due to rate increases implemented at the Brazilian operating companies and a gain of $5.1 million (represents Alliant Energys allocated portion of the total gain) realized in the first quarter of 2004 from the sale of two hydroelectric plants. The increased earnings for New Zealand were primarily due to higher electric margins resulting from higher energy prices.
Allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) increased $3.2 million primarily due to ongoing construction of the Emery plant. Interest income and other decreased $4.6 million primarily due to lower interest income from loans to discontinued operations due to asset sales during 2003.
Income Taxes The effective income tax rates were 28.1% and 30.3% for the first quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively. The lower rate was primarily due to the impact of higher non-taxable income from foreign operations.
Loss from Discontinued Operations Refer to Note 7 of Alliant Energys Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of Alliant Energys discontinued operations.
Cumulative Effect of Changes in Accounting Principles In the first quarter of 2003, Alliant Energy recorded after-tax charges of $4 million and $2 million for the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles related to the adoption on Jan. 1, 2003 of SFAS 143 and EITF Issue 02-3, Issues Related to Accounting for Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities within WPC and Integrated Services, respectively.
Overview First Quarter Results Earnings available for common stock decreased $9.7 million, primarily due to increased operating expenses and lower gas margins.
Electric Margins Electric margins and MWh sales for IP&L for the three months ended March 31 were as follows (in thousands):
Electric margins decreased $1.1 million, or 1%, largely due to the impact of slightly milder weather in the first quarter of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 and a reserve for the potential 2004 refund to customers due to the Minnesota final electric rates being lower than the interim relief effective in July 2003. These items were partially offset by higher wheeling revenues. In April 2004, IP&L filed for reconsideration of the final electric rates with the MPUC.
30
Gas Margins Gas margins and Dth sales for IP&L for the three months ended March 31 were as follows (in thousands):
Gas margins decreased $4.5 million, or 13%, primarily due to the impact of final Iowa retail gas rates effective in August 2003 being lower than interim rates that were in effect in the first quarter of 2003 and lower sales, which were partially due to slightly milder weather in the first quarter of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003.
Refer to Rates and Regulatory Matters for discussion of IP&Ls electric and gas rate filings.
Steam and Other Revenues Steam and other revenues decreased $3.5 million primarily due to lower construction management revenues from WindConnect due to the current uncertainty regarding extension of the federal renewable energy production tax credit. The decrease was largely offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses related to IP&Ls WindConnect program.
Other Operating Expenses Other operation and maintenance expenses increased $3.6 million primarily due to increases in employee and retiree benefits (comprised of compensation, medical and pension costs), partially offset by lower expenses for WindConnect. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $6.8 million primarily due to property additions.
Interest Expense and Other AFUDC increased $3.7 million due to ongoing construction of the Emery plant.
Income Taxes The effective income tax rates were 41.3% and 39.2% for the first quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase was primarily due to a decrease in the Alliant Energy tax benefit allocated to IP&L pursuant to the provisions of PUHCA.
Overview First Quarter Results Earnings available for common stock increased $12.2 million, primarily due to higher electric margins, partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate.
Electric Margins Electric margins and MWh sales for WP&L for the three months ended March 31 were as follows (in thousands):
31
Electric margins increased $24.2 million, or 27%, primarily due to the implementation of rate increases during the last 12 months, which included increased revenues to recover a significant portion of WP&Ls increased operating expenses, the impact on the comparison of a significant under recovery of purchased-power and fuel costs in the first quarter of 2003 and increased retail sales resulting from continued customer and other sales growth. These items were partially offset by the impact of implementing seasonal rates in 2003 for the first time and slightly milder weather in the first quarter of 2004 compared with the same period in 2003. Electric margins for the first quarter of 2004 were also negatively impacted by higher than anticipated fuel and purchased-power costs. WP&L filed a fuel-only rate case in the first quarter of 2004 and an interim rate increase of approximately $16 million was implemented in late March 2004. Refer to Alliant Energy Results of Operations for further discussion of seasonal electric rates.
Gas Margins Gas margins and Dth sales for WP&L for the three months ended March 31 were as follows (in thousands):
Gas margins decreased $0.9 million, or 3%, primarily due to lower sales, which were partially due to milder weather conditions in the first quarter of 2004 compared with the same period in 2003, partially offset by improved results of $2 million from WP&Ls performance-based commodity cost recovery program (benefits are shared by ratepayers and shareowners).
Refer to Rates and Regulatory Matters for discussion of WP&Ls electric and gas rate filings.
Other Operating Expenses Other operation and maintenance expenses increased $3.6 million primarily due to increases in employee and retiree benefits (comprised of compensation, medical and pension costs) and transmission and distribution expenses. These items were partially offset by lower maintenance expenses at generating facilities. Depreciation and amortization expense decreased $2.2 million, primarily due to lower software amortization, partially offset by property additions.
Income Taxes The effective income tax rates were 38.1% and 27.3% for the first quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase was primarily due to a decrease in the Alliant Energy tax benefit allocated to WP&L pursuant to the provisions of PUHCA.
Cash Flows for the Three-Month Periods Selected information from Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls respective Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31 was as follows (in thousands):
Alliant Energys cash flows from operating activities decreased $44 million, primarily due to changes in working capital, including changes in the levels of accounts receivable sold and timing of accounts payable disbursements, partially offset by the timing of collections from customers; cash flows used for financing activities increased $160 million, primarily due to changes in the amounts of debt issued and retired; and cash flows used for investing activities decreased $155 million, primarily due to the 2003 acquisition by Resources of a 309-MW, non-regulated, tolled, natural gas-fired power plant in Neenah, Wisconsin. IP&Ls cash flows from operating activities decreased $21 million, primarily due to changes in working capital; cash flows used for financing activities increased $61 million, primarily due to changes in the amounts of commercial paper issued and retired; and cash flows used for investing activities decreased $96 million, primarily due to lower construction and acquisition expenditures associated with the construction of the Emery plant. WP&Ls cash flows from operating activities decreased $7 million, primarily due to changes in working capital.
32
Certain Regulatory Approvals/Requirements PUHCA Alliant Energy is subject to a PUHCA requirement whereby Alliant Energys common equity balance must be at least 30% of its total consolidated capitalization, including short-term debt. Alliant Energys common equity ratio as of March 31, 2004, as computed under this requirement, was 47.1%.
State Regulatory Agencies In March 2004, IP&L received the necessary regulatory authorization to increase short-term borrowings from $250 million to $300 million. In March 2004, WP&L discontinued its utility customer accounts receivable sale program, increasing its short-term borrowing authority granted by the PSCW to $185 million for general corporate purposes.
Shelf Registrations In 2004, Alliant Energy, IP&L and WP&L each filed separate shelf registrations with the SEC. Alliant Energys shelf registration became effective in April 2004 and allows Alliant Energy flexibility to offer from time to time up to an aggregate of $300 million of common stock, stock purchase contracts and stock purchase units. The new shelf registration terminates the joint shelf registration filed by Alliant Energy and Resources in 2003. IP&Ls shelf registration became effective in April 2004 and allows IP&L flexibility to offer from time to time up to an aggregate of $210 million of preferred stock, senior unsecured debt securities and collateral trust bonds. IP&L issued $100 million of senior debentures in May 2004 under this shelf registration. After giving effect to this offering, $110 million remains available under the IP&L shelf registration. The new shelf registration terminates the shelf registration filed by IP&L in 2003. WP&Ls shelf registration became effective in April 2004 and allows WP&L flexibility to offer from time to time up to an aggregate of $150 million of its preferred stock, senior unsecured debt securities and first mortgage bonds.
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments As of March 31, 2004, Alliant Energy and its subsidiaries had approximately $196 million of cash and temporary cash investments, of which approximately $64 million consisted of deposits in foreign bank accounts. Due to Alliant Energy electing permanent investment of earnings for federal income tax purposes for certain foreign subsidiaries, a majority of the cash held in foreign banks cannot be repatriated without material tax obligations. Alliant Energy plans to use a portion of this cash held in foreign bank accounts to invest in future capital projects in China.
Sale of Accounts Receivable Refer to Note 11 of Alliant Energys Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information on WP&Ls discontinuance of participation in the utility customer accounts receivable sale program.
Short-term Debt Information regarding commercial paper at March 31, 2004 was as follows (dollars in millions):
Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls credit facility agreements contain various covenants, including the following:
Long-term Debt In May 2004, IP&L issued $100 million of 6.30% senior debentures due 2034 and used the proceeds to repay short-term debt primarily incurred in the construction of the Emery plant. In February 2004, Resources retired $10.0 million of its 9.75% senior notes and $9.5 million of its 7% senior notes, incurring approximately $0.03 per share of debt repayment premiums.
33
Common Equity In March 2004, Alliant Energy filed a registration statement with the SEC that became effective in April 2004, relating to the registration of approximately 3.4 million shares of Alliant Energy common stock and related common share purchase rights, which may be issued pursuant to the Alliant Energy Corporation Shareowner Direct Plan.
In connection with Alliant Energy's April 2004 shelf registration discussed previously, it is Alliant Energy's current intent to issue up to $150 million of new common stock during the remainder of 2004. Alliant Energy has entered into a sales agreement with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., under which Alliant Energy may sell from time to time up to 7.5 million shares of its common stock. Refer to "Shelf Registrations" for additional information.
Alliant Energy's Board of Directors has approved an amendment to Alliant Energy's Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 200 million to 240 million, which Alliant Energy shareowners will vote on at the annual meeting on May 21, 2004.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements A summary of Alliant Energys off-balance sheet arrangements is included in the combined Form 10-K filed by Alliant Energy, IP&L and WP&L for the year ended Dec. 31, 2003 and have not changed materially from those reported in the 2003 Form 10-K. Refer to Note 8 of Alliant Energys Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the impact of revised FIN 46 guidance on Alliant Energys tolling and purchased-power agreements.
Contractual Obligations A summary of Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls contractual obligations is included in the combined Form 10-K filed by Alliant Energy, IP&L and WP&L for the year ended Dec. 31, 2003 and have not changed materially from those reported in the 2003 Form 10-K.
Environmental A summary of Alliant Energys environmental matters is included in the combined Form 10-K filed by Alliant Energy, IP&L and WP&L for the year ended Dec. 31, 2003 and have not changed materially from those reported in the 2003 Form 10-K. Refer to Legal Proceedings for discussion of complaints filed against WP&L and Alliant Energy regarding the Columbia generating station.
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments and Positions Alliant Energys primary market risk exposures are associated with interest rates, commodity prices, equity prices and currency exchange rates. Alliant Energy has risk management policies to monitor and assist in controlling these market risks and uses derivative instruments to manage some of the exposures. A summary of Alliant Energys market risks is included in Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls combined Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2003 and have not changed materially from those reported in the 2003 Form 10-K.
Accounting Pronouncements As of March 31, 2004, Alliant Energy adopted revised FIN 46 guidance. Refer to Note 8 of Alliant Energys Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Critical Accounting Policies A summary of Alliant Energys critical accounting policies is included in Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls combined Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2003 and have not changed materially from those reported in the 2003 10-K.
Other Future Considerations A summary of Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls other future considerations is included in the combined Form 10-K filed by Alliant Energy, IP&L and WP&L for the year ended Dec. 31, 2003 and have not changed materially from those reported in the 2003 Form 10-K, except as described below. In addition to items discussed earlier in MD&A, the following items could impact Alliant Energys future financial condition or results of operations:
Mexico At March 31, 2004, Resources held a secured loan receivable of approximately $81 million from an unrelated Mexican development company. The loan proceeds were used by the development company to construct substantially all the infrastructure for the initial phase of a master-planned resort community known as Laguna del Mar located near Puerto Penasco, State of Sonora, on the Sea of Cortez. Alliant Energy has concerns regarding the Mexican development companys ability to timely complete all phases of the project, market and sell the real estate, and otherwise meet all of its obligations under the loan documents. Discussions are currently underway between Resources and the owners of the development company to resolve this matter. Resources is evaluating its alternatives, which include possibly restructuring a role for its partners or replacing them, a transfer of ownership and control of the project to Resources or the exercise of Resources remedies through legal action. Effective Jan. 1, 2004, Resources ceased accruing interest income related to this loan pending resolution of this matter. If the development of the project and related real estate sales are not ultimately successfully executed, it is possible that Alliant Energy could incur material asset valuation charges in the future. Alliant Energy is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter.
34
Brazil To complete earlier plans, the Juiz de Fora facility, a joint venture gas-fired generating facility in which Alliant Energy holds a 50% direct ownership interest, is scheduled for a 20-MW expansion from a single cycle to a combined cycle facility at an estimated cost of $24 million. However, initiation of the expansion construction is experiencing some delays due to disputes with Alliant Energys Brazilian partner regarding the financing and construction of the Juiz de Fora facility and other matters (as mentioned below). Alliant Energy is currently discussing with its partner resolution of these matters in order to ensure timely completion of the project. If the Juiz de Fora combined cycle construction is not completed as anticipated, the future performance obligations of this generation asset might be significantly adversely affected. In such an event, Alliant Energy is not required to invest any additional capital in Juiz de Fora; however, it could lead to material asset valuation or other charges with respect to Alliant Energys investment in the Juiz de Fora facility.
Alliant Energy continues to closely monitor the financial performance of its Brazilian investments. While such performance improved significantly in 2003, and while Alliant Energy expects continued improvements in 2004, Alliant Energy believes the rate of improvement can be enhanced particularly in regard to controlling costs and reduction of debt and this has been a source of dispute with its Brazilian partners. In particular, Alliant Energys Brazilian partners want to use company funds to pay dividends in order to ensure their control over the operations. Alliant Energy is not interested in and has not sought control of the operations. However, it has urged that, to the extent funds are available, they would be better used to pay down debt.
Alliant Energy has been and continues to explore with various parties, including its existing Brazilian partners, all of the options available to it concerning its investments in Brazil. Alliant Energy will consider the full range of options potentially available. Consequently, Alliant Energy is unable to provide any assurances that one or more of the options under review will occur, or that implementation of any one or more of the options will not result in Alliant Energy incurring a material charge as relates to its investments in Brazil as the company cannot currently predict the ultimate outcome of these reviews and discussions.
China The generating plants included in Alliant Energys China portfolio are currently experiencing higher than anticipated coal and related costs due primarily to government allocations and infrastructure bottlenecks. Alliant Energy is attempting to mitigate the impact of these cost increases by working with local Chinese authorities to increase the supply of lower cost coal, working with local Chinese power commissions to enable it to recover the higher costs through tariffs and reviewing for other ways to offset these cost increases within its operations. Alliant Energy is unable to predict the future of these costs in China or the ultimate outcome of its efforts to mitigate the impact of any cost increases.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk are reported under Item 2 MD&A Other Matters Market Risk Sensitive Instruments and Positions.
Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls management evaluated, with the participation of each of Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Disclosure Committee, the effectiveness of the design and operation of Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarter ended March 31, 2004 pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on their evaluation, the CEO and the CFO concluded that Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
There was no change in Alliant Energys, IP&Ls and WP&Ls internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Alliant Energys, IP&Ls or WP&Ls internal control over financial reporting.
Alliant Energy and WP&L In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Wisconsin Environmental Law Advocates (WELA) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin against WP&L and Alliant Energy alleging violations of the federal Clean Water Act at the Columbia generating station. The complaint seeks certain upgrades to Columbias wastewater treatment program, as well as unspecified penalties and attorney fees. In addition, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has been pursuing enforcement of this same matter and recently referred the matter to the Wisconsin Department of Justice (WDOJ). In March 2004, WDOJ filed a complaint in state court against WP&L and Alliant Energy alleging similar violations. Alliant Energy, WDOJ and WELA have initiated settlement discussions. Alliant Energy believes that the total cost to resolve any potential penalties and implement any required upgrades in this matter will not be material.
35
(a) Exhibits: The following Exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference.
Officer's Certificate, dated May 3, 2004, creating the 6.30% Senior Debentures due 2034 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to IP&L's Form 8-K, dated May 3, 2004)
Sales Agreement, dated April 9, 2004, between Alliant Energy and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.3 to Alliant Energy's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-114361))
Key Executive Employment and Severance Agreement, dated Feb. 4, 2004, by and between Alliant Energy and T.L. Aller
Employment Agreement by and between Alliant Energy and Erroll B. Davis, Jr., amended and restated as of March 26, 2004
Supplemental Retirement Agreement by and between Alliant Energy and T.L. Aller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Alliant Energy's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2003)
Certification of the Chairman and CEO for Alliant Energy
Certification of the Senior Executive Vice President and CFO for Alliant Energy
Certification of the Chairman and CEO for IP&L
Certification of the CFO for IP&L
Certification of the Chairman and CEO for WP&L
Certification of the CFO for WP&L
Written Statement of the CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 for Alliant Energy
Written Statement of the CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 for IP&L
Written Statement of the CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350 for WP&L
(b) Reports on Form 8-K:
Alliant Energy Alliant Energy filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, dated Jan. 30, 2004, reporting (under Items 7 and 12) that it issued a press release announcing its earnings for the fourth quarter and year ended Dec. 31, 2003, its earnings guidance for 2004 and projected 2004 and 2005 capital expenditures.
IP&L None.
WP&L None.
36
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Alliant Energy Corporation, Interstate Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Power and Light Company have each duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on the 6th day of May 2004.
37