NAPCO Security Technologies
NSSC
#5332
Rank
ยฃ1.07 B
Marketcap
ยฃ30.17
Share price
1.06%
Change (1 day)
93.19%
Change (1 year)

NAPCO Security Technologies - 10-Q quarterly report FY


Text size:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________ TO __________.

Commission File number: 0-10004

NAPCO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
Delaware 11-2277818
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer
incorporation of organization) Identification Number)
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
333 Bayview Avenue
Amityville, New York 11701
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
</TABLE>

(631) 842-9400
(Registrant's telephone number including area code)

None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year if
changed from last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days:

Yes X No
--- ---

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act):

Large Accelerated Filer Accelerated Filer X Non-Accelerated Filer
--- --- ---

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

Yes No X
--- ---

Number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as
of: NOVEMBER 8, 2006

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE PER SHARE 20,090,313
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Page
----
<S> <C>
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

NAPCO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX - SEPTEMBER 30, 2006

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, September 30, 2006 and
June 30, 2006 3

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three
Months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 4

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three
Months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 5

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 6

ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations 10

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 14

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures 14

PART II: OTHER INFORMATION 16

SIGNATURE PAGE 17
</TABLE>


2
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

NAPCO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
September 30, June 30,
2006 (unaudited) 2006
---------------- --------
(in thousands, except
share data)
<S> <C> <C>
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,066 $ 2,738
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts 23,818 25,153
Inventories, net 26,813 22,666
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 874 755
Deferred income taxes 1,581 1,531
------- -------
Total current assets 54,152 52,843
Property, plant and equipment, net 8,978 9,038
Goodwill 9,686 9,686
Other assets 275 155
------- -------
Total Assets $73,091 $71,722
======= =======
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 5,998 $ 6,060
Accrued expenses 1,368 1,372
Accrued salaries and wages 2,399 2,586
Accrued income taxes 2,380 1,877
------- -------
Total current liabilities 12,145 11,895
Long-term debt 4,700 4,700
Accrued income taxes 2,243 2,243
Deferred income taxes 1,961 1,887
Minority interest in subsidiary 147 147
------- -------
Total liabilities 21,196 20,872
------- -------
Stockholders' Equity :
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 40,000,000 shares
authorized, 19,955,313 and 19,950,453 shares issued and
outstanding, respectively 200 200
Additional paid-in capital 12,661 12,568
Retained earnings 39,034 38,082
------- -------
Total stockholders' equity 51,895 50,850
------- -------
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $73,091 $71,722
======= =======
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


3
NAPCO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
September 30,
-------------------------
2006 2005
----------- -----------
(in thousands, except
share and per share data)
<S> <C> <C>
Net sales $ 14,029 $ 14,180
Cost of sales 8,470 9,055
----------- -----------
Gross Profit 5,559 5,125
Selling, general and administrative expenses 3,998 3,873
----------- -----------
Operating Income 1,561 1,252
----------- -----------
Interest expense, net 90 38
Other expenses, net 4 4
----------- -----------
Other expenses 94 42
----------- -----------
Income Before Minority Interest and Provision
for Income Taxes 1,467 1,210
Minority interest in net loss of subsidiary, net 13 61
----------- -----------
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes 1,480 1,271
Provision for income taxes 528 456
----------- -----------
Net Income $ 952 $ 815
=========== ===========
Earnings per share (Note 1 and Note 4) *:
Basic $ 0.05 $ 0.04
=========== ===========
Diluted $ 0.05 $ 0.04
=========== ===========
Weighted average number of shares
outstanding (Note 1 and Note 4) *:
Basic 19,951,298 19,552,415
=========== ===========
Diluted 20,807,264 20,569,529
=========== ===========
</TABLE>

* The 3:2 stock split declared in November 2005 and the 3:2 stock split
declared in May 2006 (see Note 1) has been retroactively reflected in all
2005 share and per share data.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


4
NAPCO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
-----------------
2006 2005
------- -------
(in thousands)
<S> <C> <C>
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income $ 952 $ 815
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash and cash equivalents
(used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 278 254
(Recovery of) Provision for doubtful accounts (40) 68
Deferred income taxes 24 (24)
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options -- (208)
Non-cash stock based compensation expense 84 59
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 1,375 942
Inventories (4,147) (2,538)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets (119) (93)
Other assets (124) 30
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, accrued salaries and
wages, and accrued income taxes 250 (166)
------- -------
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities (1,467) (861)
------- -------
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (214) (470)
------- -------
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options 9 224
Proceeds from long-term debt -- 650
Excess tax benefits from exercise of stock options -- 208
------- -------
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities 9 1,082
------- -------
Net (decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents (1,672) (249)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period 2,738 1,178
------- -------
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period $ 1,066 $ 929
======= =======
Cash Paid During the Period for:
Interest $ 87 $ 39
======= =======
Income taxes $ -- $ 618
======= =======
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.


5
NAPCO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

1.) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Other Disclosures

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited.
In management's opinion, all adjustments (consisting of only normal
recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation have been made. The
results of operations for the period ended September 30, 2006 are not
necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other
interim period or for the full year. Certain prior year amounts have been
reclassified to conform with the current year's presentation.

The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the
accounts of Napco Security Systems, Inc. and all of its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. The Company has also consolidated a 51%-owned joint venture.
The 49% interest, owned by a third party, is reflected as minority
interest. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation.

The Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
and the reporting of revenues and expenses to prepare these financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in
conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes
contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2006. The accounting policies used in preparing these unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements are consistent with those described in
the June 30, 2006 Consolidated Financial Statements. However, for interim
financial statements, inventories are calculated using a gross profit
percentage.

Seasonality

The Company's fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30.
Historically, the end users of Napco's products want to install its
products prior to the summer; therefore sales of its products peak in the
period April 1 through June 30, the Company's fiscal fourth quarter, and
are reduced in the period July 1 through September 30, the Company's fiscal
first quarter. To a lesser degree, sales in Europe are also adversely
impacted in the Company's first fiscal quarter because of European vacation
patterns, i.e., many distributors and installers are closed for the month
of August.

Advertising and Promotional Costs

Advertising and promotional costs are included in "Selling, General and
Administrative" expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
and are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense for the three months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 was $358,000 and $407,000, respectively.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are included in Cost of Sales in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and are expensed as incurred.
Research and Development expense for the three months ended September 30,
2006 and 2005 was $1,293,000 and $1,145,000, respectively.

Business Concentration and Credit Risk

An entity is more vulnerable to concentrations of credit risk if it is
exposed to risk of loss greater than it would have had if it mitigated its
risk through diversification of customers. Such risks of loss manifest
differently, depending on the nature of the concentration, and vary in
significance. The Company had two customers with accounts receivable
balances that aggregated 35% and 33% of the Company's accounts receivable
at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively. Sales to neither of
these customers exceeded 10% of net sales in any of the past three years.


6
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Accounts Receivable as of
(in thousands):
---------------------------
September 30, June 30,
2006 2006
------------- -----------
$ % $ %
----- --- ----- ---
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Customer A 5,027 21% 5,225 21%
Customer B 3,399 14% 3,083 12%
----- --- ----- ---
8,426 35% 8,308 33%
===== === ===== ===
</TABLE>

These customers sell primarily within North America. Although management
believes that these customers are sound and creditworthy, a severe adverse
impact on their business operations could have a corresponding material
adverse effect on the Company's net sales, cash flows, and/or financial
condition. In the ordinary course of business, the Company has established
an allowance for doubtful accounts and customer deductions in the amount of
$380,000 and $420,000 as of September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006,
respectively. The decrease in this allowance related primarily to the
Company's recent history of lower bad debt write-offs. The allowance for
doubtful accounts is a subjective critical estimate that has a direct
impact on reported net earnings. This allowance is based upon the
evaluation of accounts receivable aging, specific exposures and historical
trends.

Stock Options

During the three months ended September 30, 2006 the Company granted no
stock options under its 2002 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan. 4,860
options were exercised under this plan during the three months ended
September 30, 2006.

Stock Dividend and Stock Splits

On May 10, 2006 the Company's Board of Directors approved a 3-for-2 stock
split of its common stock, to be paid in the form of a 50% stock dividend
to stockholders of record on May 24, 2006. The Company delivered the shares
on June 7, 2006. Upon completion of the split, the total number of shares
of common stock outstanding increased from approximately 13,300,000 to
approximately 19,950,000.

On November 29, 2005 the Company's Board of Directors approved a 3-for-2
split of its common stock, payable in the form of a 50% stock dividend to
stockholders of record on December 14, 2005. The additional shares were
distributed on December 28, 2005. Upon completion of the split, the total
number of shares of common stock outstanding increased from approximately
8,795,000 to approximately 13,192,000.

All share and per share amounts (except par value) have been retroactively
adjusted to reflect the stock splits and dividend. There was no net effect
on total stockholders' equity as a result of these transactions.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") Interpretation No. 48
("FIN 48"), "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - An Interpretation
of FASB Statement No. 109". FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty
in income taxes recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in
accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This
Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute
for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also
provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN
48 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the
requirements of FIN 48 and has not yet determined if the adoption of FIN 48
will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial
statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements".
SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and
liabilities. In addition, this statement defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. Where applicable, this statement simplifies and
codifies related guidance within generally accepted accounting principles.
This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years


7
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. The Company's adoption of SFAS No. 157 is not expected to have a
material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

2.) Employee Stock-based Compensation

The Company has established two share incentive programs as discussed in
more detail in the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes
contained in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 2006. Prior to fiscal 2006, the Company applied the intrinsic
value method as outlined in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," ("APB No. 25") and related
interpretations in accounting for stock options and share units granted
under these programs. Under the intrinsic value method, no compensation
expense was recognized if the exercise price of the Company's employee
stock options equaled the market price of the underlying stock on the date
of the grant. Stock-based compensation costs of $84,000 and $59,000 was
recognized in three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The effect on both Basic and Diluted Earnings per share was $0.004 and
$0.007 for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.

3.) Inventories

Inventories consist of (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
September 30, June 30,
2006 2006
------------- --------
<S> <C> <C>
Component parts $16,009 $13,533
Work-in-process 3,070 2,595
Finished products 7,734 6,538
------- -------
$26,813 $22,666
======= =======
</TABLE>

For interim financial statements, inventories are calculated using a gross
profit percentage. In addition, the Company records an inventory
obsolescence reserve, which represents the difference between the cost of
the inventory and its estimated market value, based on various product
sales projections. This reserve is calculated using an estimated
obsolescence percentage applied to the inventory based on age, historical
trends and requirements to support forecasted sales. As of September 30,
2006 and June 30, 2006, balances in these reserves amounted to $836,000 and
$987,000, respectively. In addition, and as necessary, the Company may
establish specific reserves for future known or anticipated events.

4.) Earnings Per Common Share

The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 128, "Earnings Per Share".
In accordance with SFAS No. 128, earnings per common share amounts ("Basic
EPS") were computed by dividing earnings by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding for the period. Earnings per common share
amounts, assuming dilution ("Diluted EPS"), were computed by reflecting the
potential dilution from the exercise of stock options. SFAS No. 128
requires the presentation of both Basic EPS and Diluted EPS on the face of
the consolidated statements of income.

A reconciliation between the numerators and denominators of the Basic and
Diluted EPS computations for earnings is as follows (in thousands except
per share data) (Information reflects the stock splits as described in Note
1):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended September 30, 2006
---------------------------------------
Net Income Shares Per Share
(numerator) (denominator) Amounts
----------- ------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
BASIC EPS
Net income attributable to common stock $952 19,951 $0.05
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES
Employee Stock Options $ -- 856 $ --
---- ------ -----
DILUTED EPS
Net income attributable to common stock
and assumed option exercises $952 20,807 $0.05
==== ====== =====
</TABLE>

37,499 options to purchase shares of common stock in the three months ended
September 30, 2006 were excluded in the computation of Diluted EPS because
the exercise prices were in excess of the average market price for this
period and their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.


8
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended September 30, 2005
---------------------------------------
Net Income Shares Per Share
(numerator) (denominator) Amounts
----------- ------------- ---------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
BASIC EPS
Net income attributable to common stock $815 19,552 $0.04
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SECURITIES
Employee Stock Options $ -- 1,018 $ --
---- ------ -----
DILUTED EPS
Net income attributable to common stock
and assumed option exercises $815 20,570 $0.04
==== ====== =====
</TABLE>

No options to purchase shares of common stock in the three months ended
September 30, 2005 were excluded in the computation of Diluted EPS because
no exercise prices were in excess of the average market price for this
period.

5.) Long Term Debt

The Company's primary source of financing is an $18,000,000 revolving
credit agreement, secured by all the accounts receivable, inventory, the
Company's headquarters in Amityville, New York, common stock of three of
the Company's subsidiaries and certain other assets of Napco Security
Systems, Inc. The revolving credit agreement bears interest at either the
Prime Rate less 1/4% or an alternate rate based on LIBOR as described in
the agreement. The agreement contains various restrictions and covenants
including, among others, restrictions on payment of dividends, restrictions
on borrowings, restrictions on capital expenditures, the maintenance of
minimum amounts of tangible net worth, and compliance with other certain
financial ratios, as defined in the agreement. The agreement has an
expiration date of September 2008 and any outstanding borrowings are to be
repaid or refinanced on or before that time.

6.) Geographical Data

The Company's domestic and foreign sales for the periods presented are
summarized in the following tabulation (in thousands):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three Months Ended
September 30,
------------------
2006 2005
------- -------
<S> <C> <C>
Sales to external customers (1):
Domestic $11,435 $11,994
Foreign 2,594 2,186
------- -------
Total Net Sales $14,029 $14,180
======= =======
</TABLE>

(1) All of the Company's sales occur in the United States and are shipped
primarily from the Company's facilities in the United States and United
Kingdom. There were no sales into any one foreign country in excess of 10%
of Net Sales.

7.) Commitments and Contingencies

In December 2004, the Company became a defendant in a product related
lawsuit, in which the plaintiff seeks damages of approximately $1,500,000.
This action is being defended by the Company's insurance company on behalf
of the Company. Management believes that the action is without merit and
plans to have this action vigorously defended.

In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to claims and/or
litigation. Management believes that the settlement of such claims and/or
litigation, considered in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company's financial position and results of operations.


9
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations

Napco Security Systems, Inc.

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the information incorporated by reference
may include "Forward-Looking Statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934. The
Company intends the Forward-Looking Statements to be covered by the Safe Harbor
Provisions for Forward-Looking Statements. All statements regarding the
Company's expected financial position and operating results, its business
strategy, its financing plans and the outcome of any contingencies are
Forward-Looking Statements. The Forward-Looking Statements are based on current
estimates and projections about our industry and our business. Words such as
"anticipates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates,"
or variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify
such Forward-Looking Statements. The Forward-Looking Statements are subject to
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those set forth or implied by any Forward-Looking Statements. For example,
the Company is highly dependent on its Chief Executive Officer for strategic
planning. If he is unable to perform his services for any significant period of
time, the Company's ability to continue growing could be adversely affected. In
addition, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the
Forward-Looking Statements include, but are not limited to, adverse tax
consequences of offshore operations, distribution problems, unforeseen
environmental liabilities and the uncertain military, political and economic
conditions in the world.

Overview

The Company is a diversified manufacturer of security products, encompassing
intrusion and fire alarms, building access control systems and electronic
locking devices. These products are used for commercial, residential,
institutional, industrial and governmental applications, and are sold worldwide
principally to independent distributors, dealers and installers of security
equipment. International sales accounted for approximately 16% of our revenues
for fiscal year 2006 and 18% for the first three months of fiscal 2007.

The Company owns and operates manufacturing facilities in Amityville, New York
and the Dominican Republic. A significant portion of our operating costs are
fixed, and do not fluctuate with changes in customer demand or utilization of
our manufacturing capacity. As product demand rises and factory utilization
increases, the fixed costs are spread over increased output, which should
improve profit margins. Conversely, when sales decline our fixed costs are
spread over reduced levels, thereby decreasing margins.

In February 2004 the Company entered into a joint venture with an unrelated
company to sell security-related products, including those manufactured by the
Company, in the Middle East. The Company owns 51% of the newly formed company,
an LLC organized in New York, which has its main operations in the United Arab
Emirates. Revenues generated by this joint venture were approximately 2% of our
revenues for fiscal 2006 and 3% for the first three months of fiscal 2007.

The security products market is characterized by constant incremental innovation
in product design and manufacturing technologies. Generally, the Company devotes
7-8% of revenues to research and development (R&D) on an annual basis. Products
resulting from our R&D investments in fiscal 2006 did not contribute materially
to revenue during fiscal 2006, but should benefit the Company in future years.
In general, the new products introduced by the Company are initially shipped in
limited quantities, and increase over time. Prices and manufacturing costs tend
to decline over time as products and technologies mature.

Economic and Other Factors

The post September 11 era has generally been characterized by increased demand
of electronic security products and services. The Company believes the security
equipment market is likely to continue to exhibit healthy growth, particularly
in industrial sectors, due to ongoing concerns over the adequacy of security
safeguards.

Seasonality

The Company's fiscal year begins on July 1 and ends on June 30. Historically,
the end users of Napco's products want to install its products prior to the
summer; therefore sales of its products peak in the period April 1 through June
30, the Company's fiscal fourth quarter, and are reduced in the period July 1
through September 30, the Company's fiscal first quarter. To a lesser degree,
sales in


10
Europe are also adversely impacted in the Company's first fiscal quarter because
of European vacation patterns, i.e., many distributors and installers are closed
for the month of August.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in those financial statements. These
judgments can be subjective and complex, and consequently actual results could
differ from those estimates. Our most critical accounting policies relate to
revenue recognition; concentration of credit risk; inventory; goodwill; and
income taxes.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues from merchandise sales are recorded at the time the product is shipped
or delivered to the customer pursuant to the terms of purchase. We report our
sales levels on a net sales basis, which is computed by deducting from gross
sales the amount of actual returns received and an amount established for
anticipated returns and allowances.

Our sales return accrual is a subjective critical estimate that has a direct
impact on reported net sales and income. This accrual is calculated based on a
history of gross sales and actual sales returns, as well as management's
estimate of anticipated returns and allowances.

Business Concentration and Credit Risk

An entity is more vulnerable to concentrations of credit risk if it is exposed
to risk of loss greater than it would have had if it mitigated its risk through
diversification of customers. Such risks of loss manifest differently, depending
on the nature of the concentration, and vary in significance. The Company had
two customers with accounts receivable balances that aggregated 35% and 33% of
the Company's accounts receivable at September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006,
respectively. Sales to neither of these customers exceeded 10% of net sales in
any of the past three years.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Accounts Receivable
as of (in thousands):
--------------------------
September 30, June 30,
2006 2006
------------- ----------
$ % $ %
----- -- ----- --
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Customer A 5,027 21% 5,225 21%
Customer B 3,399 14% 3,083 12%
----- --- ----- ---
8,426 35% 8,308 33%
===== === ===== ===
</TABLE>

These customers sell primarily within North America. Although management
believes that these customers are sound and creditworthy, a severe adverse
impact on their business operations could have a corresponding material adverse
effect on the Company's net sales, cash flows, and/or financial condition. In
the ordinary course of business, the Company has established an allowance for
doubtful accounts and customer deductions in the amount of $380,000 and $420,000
as of September 30, 2006 and June 30, 2006, respectively. The decrease in this
allowance related primarily to the Company's recent history of lower bad debt
write-offs. The allowance for doubtful accounts is a subjective critical
estimate that has a direct impact on reported net earnings. This allowance is
based upon the evaluation of accounts receivable aging, specific exposures and
historical trends.

Inventories

We state our inventory at the lower of cost or fair market value, with cost
being determined on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. We believe FIFO most
closely matches the flow of our products from manufacture through sale. The
reported net value of our inventory includes finished saleable products,
work-in-process and raw materials that will be sold or used in future periods.
Inventory cost includes raw materials, direct labor and overhead.


11
We also record an inventory obsolescence reserve, which represents the
difference between the cost of the inventory and its estimated market value,
based on various product sales projections. This reserve is calculated using an
estimated obsolescence percentage applied to the inventory based on age,
historical trends and requirements to support forecasted sales. In addition, and
as necessary, we may establish specific reserves for future known or anticipated
events. For interim financial statements, inventories are calculated using a
gross profit percentage.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Effective July 1, 2001, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets. These statements established accounting and reporting
standards for acquired goodwill and other intangible assets. Specifically, the
standards address how acquired intangible assets should be accounted for both at
the time of acquisition and after they have been recognized in the financial
statements. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, intangible assets, including
purchased goodwill, must be evaluated for impairment. Those intangible assets
that are classified as goodwill or as other intangibles with indefinite lives
are not amortized.

Impairment testing is performed in two steps: (i) the Company determines
impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying
value, and (ii) if there is an impairment, the Company measures the amount of
impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the
carrying amount of that goodwill. The Company has performed its annual
impairment evaluation required by this standard and determined that its goodwill
is not impaired.

Income taxes

Deferred income taxes are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of
temporary differences between the amounts reflected for financial reporting and
tax purposes. Net deferred tax assets are adjusted by a valuation allowance if,
based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some
portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. If the
Company determines that a deferred tax asset will not be realizable or that a
previously reserved deferred tax asset will become realizable, an adjustment to
the deferred tax asset will result in a reduction of, or increase to, earnings
at that time. The provision for income taxes represents U.S. Federal, state and
foreign taxes. Through June 30, 2001, the Company's subsidiary in the Dominican
Republic, Napco/Alarm Lock Group International, S.A. ("Napco DR"), was not
subject to tax in the United States, as a result, no taxes were provided.
Effective July 1, 2001, the Company made a domestication election for Napco DR.
Accordingly, its income is subject to taxation in the United States on a going
forward basis.

In March 2003, Napco Security Systems, Inc. timely filed its income tax return
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002. This return included an election to
treat one of the Company's foreign subsidiaries, Napco DR, as if it were a
domestic corporation beginning July 1, 2001. This election was based on a then
recently enacted Internal Revenue Code ("Code") provision. As a result of this
election, Napco DR is treated, for Federal income tax purposes, as transferring
all of its assets to a domestic corporation in connection with an exchange.
Although this type of transfer usually results in the recognition of taxable
income to the extent of any untaxed earnings and profits, the Code provision
provides an exemption for applicable corporations. The Company qualifies as an
applicable corporation pursuant to this Code section, and based on this Code
exemption, the Company treated the transfer of approximately $27,000,000 of
Napco DR's untaxed earnings and profits as nontaxable.

The Internal Revenue Service has issued a Revenue Procedure which is
inconsistent with the Code exemption described above. The Code is the actual
law; a Revenue Procedure is the IRS's interpretation of the law. The Code has a
higher level of authority than a Revenue Procedure. Management believes that it
has appropriately relied on the guidance in the Code when filing its income tax
return. If challenged, the Company believes that the potential liability would
range from $0 to $9,450,000. However, the Company also believes there are other
mitigating factors that would limit the amount of the potential liability, and
as a result, management accrued a liability of $2,243,000 as of June 30, 2002.
The Company's tax provision utilizes estimates made by management and as such,
is subject to change as described in Note 1 of the Consolidated financial
statements included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006.


12
Results of Operations

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Three months ended September
30, (in thousands)
-------------------------------
% Increase/
2006 2005 (decrease)
------- ------- -----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Net sales $14,029 $14,180 (1.1)%
Gross profit 5,559 5,125 8.5%
Gross profit as a % of net sales 39.6% 36.1% 3.5%
Selling, general and administrative 3,998 3,873 3.2%
Selling, general and administrative
as a percentage of net sales 28.5% 27.3% 1.2%
Operating income 1,561 1,252 24.7%
Interest expense 90 38 136.8%
Other expense 4 4 --
Minority interest in net loss of
subsidiary, net 13 61 (78.7)%
Provision for income taxes 528 456 15.8%
Net income 952 815 16.8%
</TABLE>

Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2006 decreased by approximately
1% to $14,029,000 as compared to $14,180,000 for the same period a year ago. The
decrease in sales for the three months was mainly in the Company's intrusion
alarm business as partially offset by an increase in sales of the Company's door
locking and access control products.

The Company's gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2006
increased by $434,000 to $5,559,000 or 39.6% of sales as compared to $5,125,000
or 36.1% of sales for the same period a year ago. The increase in gross profit
was due primarily to increased overhead absorption resulting from the increased
production rate described below, a reduction in the Company's inventory reserves
of approximately $150,000, a more favorable product mix resulting from the
increased sales of the Company's door locking and access control products as
well as a positive raw material pricing variance.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 increased by $125,000 to $3,998,000, or 28.5% of sales, as
compared to $3,873,000, or 27.3% of sales a year ago. The increase in dollars
and as a percentage of sales for the three months ended September 30, 2006 was
due primarily to expenses relating to the Company's initial audit of its
internal controls required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and commission
expense related to increases in sales of the Company's door-locking products as
partially offset by a decrease in bad debt expense resulting from the Company's
recent history of lower bad debt write-offs. As fiscal 2006 was the initial
period requiring an audit by the Company's Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm and that the opinion expressed by them for that period was that
our assessment that we maintained effective internal controls over financial
reporting was fairly stated, Management believes that these audit expenses will
be reduced for fiscal 2007 as much of the documentation performed for the
initial assessment and audit will be utilized in subsequent periods.

Interest expense, net for the three months ended September 30, 2006 increased by
$52,000 to $90,000 as compared to $38,000 for the same period a year ago. The
increase in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 resulted primarily from the
increase in the Company's average outstanding debt, the result of the Company's
increase in inventory as discussed below, as well as in interest rates as
compared to those from the same period a year ago.

The Company's provision for income taxes for the three months ended September
30, 2006 increased by $72,000 to $528,000 as compared to $456,000 for the same
period a year ago. The tax provision for the three months ended September 30,
2006 is calculated using an estimated annual effective tax rate of 35.65%. The
increase in provision for income taxes resulted from the increase in Income
before income tax.

Net income increased by $137,000 to $952,000 or $0.05 per share for the three
months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to $815,000 or $0.04 per share for
the same period a year ago. This increase was primarily due to the
aforementioned increase gross


13
profit as partially offset by the increases in selling, general and
administrative expenses, net of the related increase in provision for income
taxes. The effect of the 3-for-2 stock splits discussed above has been
retroactively reflected in all fiscal 2005 per share data.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the three months ended September 30, 2006 the Company utilized all of its
cash generated from operations to purchase property, plant and equipment
($214,000) and invest in additional inventory ($4,147,000) as discussed below.
The Company's management believes that current working capital, cash flows from
operations and its revolving credit agreement will be sufficient to fund the
Company's operations through at least the next twelve months.

Accounts Receivable at September 30, 2006 decreased $1,335,000 to $23,818,000 as
compared to $25,153,000 at June 30, 2006. This decrease is primarily the result
of the higher sales volume during the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as compared to
the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as partially offset by extended terms
granted to certain of the Company's customers during the quarter ended June 30,
2006. Certain of these terms extended beyond September 30, 2006.

Inventory at September 30, 2006 increased by $4,147,000 to $26,813,000 as
compared to $22,666,000 at June 30, 2006. This increase was primarily the result
of the Company level-loading its production schedule in anticipation of its
historical sales cycle where a larger portion of the Company's sales occur in
the latter fiscal quarters as compared to the earlier quarters as well as
producing inventory based on a production plan to support higher projected sales
in fiscal 2007 as compared to fiscal 2006 as well as additional inventory to
support the introduction of the Company's new Freedom 64 code-less intrusion
alarm system and it's V-cam remote access video surveillance system..

As of September 30, 2006, the Company's credit facility consisted of an
$18,000,000 secured revolving credit agreement. As of September 30, 2006 there
was approximately $13,300,000 available under the secured revolving credit
facility. This credit facility expires in September 2008.

As of September 30, 2006 the Company had no material commitments for capital
expenditures or inventory purchases other than purchase orders issued in the
normal course of business.

ITEM 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company's principal financial instrument is long-term debt (consisting of a
revolving credit facility) that provides for interest at a spread below the
prime rate. The Company is affected by market risk exposure primarily through
the effect of changes in interest rates on amounts payable by the Company under
this credit facility. At September 30, 2006, an aggregate principal amount of
approximately $4,700,000 was outstanding under the Company's credit facility. If
principal amounts outstanding under the Company's credit facility remained at
this year-end level for an entire year and the prime rate increased or
decreased, respectively, by 1% the Company would pay or save, respectively, an
additional $47,000 in interest that year.

A significant number of foreign sales transactions by the Company are
denominated in U.S. dollars. As such, the Company has shifted foreign currency
exposure onto many of its foreign customers. As a result, if exchange rates move
against foreign customers, the Company could experience difficulty collecting
unsecured accounts receivable, the cancellation of existing orders or the loss
of future orders. The foregoing could materially adversely affect the Company's
business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the
Company transacts certain sales in Europe in British Pounds Sterling, therefore
exposing itself to a certain amount of foreign currency risk. Management
believes that the amount of this exposure is immaterial. We are also exposed to
foreign currency risk relative to expenses incurred in Dominican Pesos ("RD$"),
the local currency of the Company's production facility in the Dominican
Republic. The result of a 10% strengthening in the U.S. dollar to our RD$
expenses would result in an annual decrease in income from operations of
approximately $450,000.

ITEM 4: Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC's rules and forms, and that


14
such information is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management necessarily applied
its judgment in assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and
procedures, which, by their nature, can provide only reasonable assurance
regarding management's control objectives.

At the conclusion of the period ended September 30, 2006, we carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective in alerting them in a timely manner to information relating to the
Company required to be disclosed in this report.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2007, there were no changes in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over
financial reporting.


15
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Information regarding the Company's Risk Factors are set forth in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006.
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously
disclosed in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006
during the three months ended September 30, 2006

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1 Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of Richard L.
Soloway, Chairman of the Board and President

31.2 Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of Kevin S. Buchel,
Senior Vice President of Operations and Finance

32.1 Section 1350 Certifications


16
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

November 8, 2006

NAPCO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC
(Registrant)


By: /S/ RICHARD L. SOLOWAY
---------------------------------
Richard L. Soloway
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Secretary
(Chief Executive Officer)


By: /S/ KEVIN S. BUCHEL
---------------------------------
Kevin S. Buchel
Senior Vice President of Operations
and Finance and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)


17