Companies:
10,575
total market cap:
ยฃ102.071 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
ยฃ GBP
$
USD
๐บ๐ธ
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
STAG Industrial
STAG
#2404
Rank
ยฃ5.55 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
ยฃ28.46
Share price
-0.11%
Change (1 day)
2.21%
Change (1 year)
๐ Real estate
๐ฐ Investment
๐๏ธ REITs
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
STAG Industrial
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2017 Q3
STAG Industrial - 10-Q quarterly report FY2017 Q3
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
____________________________________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
____________________________________________________________________________
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended
September 30, 2017
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 1-34907
____________________________________________________________________________
STAG INDUSTRIAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
____________________________________________________________________________
Maryland
27-3099608
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
One Federal Street, 23rd Floor
Boston, Massachusetts
02110
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(617) 574-4777
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller reporting company
¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Emerging growth company
¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common and preferred stock as of the latest practicable date.
Class
Outstanding at October 31, 2017
Common Stock ($0.01 par value)
94,082,595
6.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ($0.01 par value)
2,800,000
6.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ($0.01 par value)
3,000,000
Table of Contents
STAG INDUSTRIAL, INC.
Table of Contents
PART I.
Financial Information
3
Item 1.
Financial Statements (unaudited)
3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
5
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
8
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
27
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
51
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
52
PART II.
Other Information
53
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
53
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
53
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
53
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
53
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
53
Item 5.
Other Information
53
Item 6.
Exhibits
54
SIGNATURES
55
2
Table of Contents
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
STAG Industrial, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited, in thousands, except share data)
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Assets
Rental Property:
Land
$
321,365
$
272,162
Buildings and improvements, net of accumulated depreciation of $234,349 and $187,413, respectively
1,880,350
1,550,141
Deferred leasing intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $273,602 and $237,456, respectively
318,915
294,533
Total rental property, net
2,520,630
2,116,836
Cash and cash equivalents
11,040
12,192
Restricted cash
3,547
9,613
Tenant accounts receivable, net
30,591
25,223
Prepaid expenses and other assets
27,721
20,821
Interest rate swaps
2,270
1,471
Assets held for sale, net
5,673
—
Total assets
$
2,601,472
$
2,186,156
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities:
Unsecured credit facility
$
245,000
$
28,000
Unsecured term loans, net
446,066
446,608
Unsecured notes, net
398,168
397,966
Mortgage notes, net
58,695
163,565
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
54,539
35,389
Interest rate swaps
2,873
2,438
Tenant prepaid rent and security deposits
18,765
15,195
Dividends and distributions payable
11,516
9,728
Deferred leasing intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $12,487 and $10,450, respective
ly
21,127
20,341
Total liabilities
1,256,749
1,119,230
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Equity:
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, 15,000,000 shares authorized,
Series B, 2,800,000 shares (liquidation preference of $25.00 per share) issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
70,000
70,000
Series C, 3,000,000 shares (liquidation preference of $25.00 per share) issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
75,000
75,000
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 93,862,783 and 80,352,304 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
939
804
Additional paid-in capital
1,638,309
1,293,706
Common stock dividends in excess of earnings
(489,078
)
(410,978
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(1,209
)
(1,496
)
Total stockholders’ equity
1,293,961
1,027,036
Noncontrolling interest
50,762
39,890
Total equity
1,344,723
1,066,926
Total liabilities and equity
$
2,601,472
$
2,186,156
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
STAG Industrial, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited, in thousands, except share data)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Revenue
Rental income
$
65,673
$
53,511
$
186,621
$
156,575
Tenant recoveries
12,366
8,911
32,952
26,807
Other income
105
173
244
327
Total revenue
78,144
62,595
219,817
183,709
Expenses
Property
15,401
11,258
42,312
35,672
General and administrative
8,380
7,603
25,090
26,373
Property acquisition costs
1,386
1,978
4,684
3,113
Depreciation and amortization
38,186
31,489
110,286
91,725
Loss on impairments
—
—
—
11,231
Loss on involuntary conversion
—
—
330
—
Other expenses
58
279
1,502
857
Total expenses
63,411
52,607
184,204
168,971
Other income (expense)
Interest income
2
3
10
8
Interest expense
(10,446
)
(10,504
)
(31,557
)
(31,841
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
(13
)
—
(15
)
(1,973
)
Gain on the sales of rental property, net
17,563
643
19,225
21,589
Total other income (expense)
7,106
(9,858
)
(12,337
)
(12,217
)
Net income
$
21,839
$
130
$
23,276
$
2,521
Less: income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends
828
(190
)
673
(424
)
Net income attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc.
$
21,011
$
320
$
22,603
$
2,945
Less: preferred stock dividends
2,449
4,001
7,345
10,914
Less: amount allocated to participating securities
84
95
250
289
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
18,478
$
(3,776
)
$
15,008
$
(8,258
)
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic
92,786,852
71,130,848
87,632,167
68,984,670
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted
93,434,974
71,130,848
88,238,140
68,984,670
Net income (loss) per share — basic and diluted
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — basic
$
0.20
$
(0.05
)
$
0.17
$
(0.12
)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — diluted
$
0.20
$
(0.05
)
$
0.17
$
(0.12
)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
STAG Industrial, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(unaudited, in thousands)
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Net income
$
21,839
$
130
$
23,276
$
2,521
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Income (loss) on interest rate swaps
598
2,863
300
(14,028
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
598
2,863
300
(14,028
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
22,437
2,993
23,576
(11,507
)
(Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends
(828
)
190
(673
)
424
Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
(26
)
(140
)
(13
)
709
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc.
$
21,583
$
3,043
$
22,890
$
(10,374
)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
STAG Industrial, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Equity
(unaudited, in thousands, except share data)
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Additional Paid-in Capital
Common Stock Dividends in excess of Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Total Stockholders' Equity
Noncontrolling Interest - Unit holders in Operating Partnership
Total Equity
Shares
Amount
Nine months ended September 30, 2017
Balance, December 31, 2016
$
145,000
80,352,304
$
804
$
1,293,706
$
(410,978
)
$
(1,496
)
$
1,027,036
$
39,890
$
1,066,926
Proceeds from sales of common stock
—
13,165,996
132
339,492
—
—
339,624
—
339,624
Offering costs
—
—
—
(4,746
)
—
—
(4,746
)
—
(4,746
)
Dividends and distributions, net
(7,345
)
—
—
—
(93,164
)
—
(100,509
)
(4,932
)
(105,441
)
Non-cash compensation activity
—
43,492
—
2,911
(194
)
—
2,717
3,509
6,226
Redemption of common units to common stock
—
300,991
3
3,314
—
—
3,317
(3,317
)
—
Issuance of units
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
18,558
18,558
Rebalancing of noncontrolling interest
—
—
—
3,632
—
—
3,632
(3,632
)
—
Other comprehensive income
—
—
—
—
—
287
287
13
300
Net income
7,345
—
—
—
15,258
—
22,603
673
23,276
Balance, September 30, 2017
$
145,000
93,862,783
$
939
$
1,638,309
$
(489,078
)
$
(1,209
)
$
1,293,961
$
50,762
$
1,344,723
Nine months ended September 30, 2016
Balance, December 31, 2015
$
139,000
68,077,333
$
681
$
1,017,397
$
(332,271
)
$
(2,350
)
$
822,457
$
35,400
$
857,857
Proceeds from sales of common stock
—
4,201,500
42
100,672
—
—
100,714
—
100,714
Issuance of series C preferred stock
75,000
—
—
—
—
—
75,000
—
75,000
Offering costs
—
—
—
(4,315
)
—
—
(4,315
)
—
(4,315
)
Dividends and distributions, net
(10,914
)
—
—
—
(72,436
)
—
(83,350
)
(4,118
)
(87,468
)
Non-cash compensation activity
—
112,684
1
2,745
—
—
2,746
4,986
7,732
Redemption of common units to common stock
—
68,492
1
616
—
—
617
(617
)
—
Rebalancing of noncontrolling interest
—
—
—
(57
)
—
—
(57
)
57
—
Other comprehensive loss
—
—
—
—
—
(13,319
)
(13,319
)
(709
)
(14,028
)
Net income (loss)
10,914
—
—
—
(7,969
)
—
2,945
(424
)
2,521
Balance, September 30, 2016
$
214,000
72,460,009
$
725
$
1,117,058
$
(412,676
)
$
(15,669
)
$
903,438
$
34,575
$
938,013
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
STAG Industrial, Inc
.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited, in thousands)
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
$
23,276
$
2,521
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
110,286
91,725
Loss on impairments
—
11,231
Loss on involuntary conversion
330
—
Non-cash portion of interest expense
1,465
1,208
Intangible amortization in rental income, net
3,873
4,751
Straight-line rent adjustments, net
(4,855
)
(2,205
)
Dividends on forfeited equity compensation
2
3
Loss on extinguishment of debt
15
1,973
Gain on the sales of rental property, net
(19,225
)
(21,589
)
Non-cash compensation expense
7,159
7,692
Change in assets and liabilities:
Tenant accounts receivable, net
(955
)
(215
)
Restricted cash
483
(461
)
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(10,479
)
(7,375
)
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
5,572
8,128
Tenant prepaid rent and security deposits
3,570
518
Total adjustments
97,241
95,384
Net cash provided by operating activities
120,517
97,905
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisitions of land and buildings and improvements
(405,790
)
(195,893
)
Additions of land and building and improvements
(27,539
)
(20,703
)
Proceeds from sales of rental property, net
43,454
50,301
Proceeds from insurance on involuntary conversion
857
—
Restricted cash
5,583
(469
)
Acquisition deposits, net
685
(1,315
)
Acquisitions of deferred leasing intangibles
(79,961
)
(51,937
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(462,711
)
(220,016
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from sale of series C preferred stock
—
75,000
Proceeds from unsecured credit facility
538,000
286,000
Repayment of unsecured credit facility
(321,000
)
(213,000
)
Repayment of mortgage notes
(105,027
)
(33,084
)
Payment of loan fees and costs
(1,170
)
(140
)
Payment of loan prepayment fees and costs
(15
)
(1,969
)
Dividends and distributions
(103,655
)
(86,890
)
Proceeds from sales of common stock
339,624
100,714
Repurchase and retirement of restricted stock
(969
)
—
Offering costs
(4,746
)
(4,258
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
341,042
122,373
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(1,152
)
262
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period
12,192
12,011
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period
$
11,040
$
12,273
Supplemental disclosure:
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest
$
30,476
$
29,127
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities
Issuance of units for acquisitions of land and building and improvements and deferred leasing intangibles
$
18,558
$
—
Acquisitions of land and buildings and improvements
$
(17,304
)
$
(3,392
)
Acquisitions of deferred leasing intangibles
$
(2,064
)
$
(938
)
Partial disposal of building due to involuntary conversion of building
$
363
$
492
Investing other receivables due to involuntary conversion of building
$
(363
)
$
(492
)
Change in additions of land, building, and improvements included in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
$
(13,201
)
$
(1,587
)
Additions to building and other capital improvements from non-cash compensation
$
(24
)
$
(14
)
Assumption of mortgage notes
$
—
$
4,037
Fair market value adjustment to mortgage notes acquired
$
—
$
75
Change in loan fees, costs, and offering costs included in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities
$
30
$
6
Dividends and distributions declared but not paid
$
11,516
$
8,814
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
STAG Industrial, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. Organization
and
Description of Business
STAG Industrial, Inc. (the “Company”) is an industrial real estate operating company focused on the acquisition and operation of single-tenant, industrial properties throughout the United States. The Company was formed as a Maryland corporation and has elected to be treated and intends to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT, commonly called an UPREIT, and owns substantially all of its assets and conducts substantially all of its business through its operating partnership, STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). As of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company owned a
95.8%
and
95.7%
, respectively, common equity interest in the Operating Partnership. The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. As used herein, the “Company” refers to STAG Industrial, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships, including the Operating Partnership, except where context otherwise requires.
As of
September 30, 2017
, the Company owned
347
buildings in
37
states with approximately
69.1 million
rentable square feet, consisting of
279
warehouse/distribution buildings,
53
light manufacturing buildings,
14
flex/office buildings, and
one
building in redevelopment. The Company’s buildings were approximately
94.6%
leased to
301
tenants as of
September 30, 2017
.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Interim Financial Information
The accompanying interim financial statements have been presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X for interim financial information. Accordingly, these statements do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying interim financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary for their fair statement in conformity with GAAP. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The year-end consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016
.
Basis of Presentation
The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the Operating Partnership and their subsidiaries. Interests in the Operating Partnership not owned by the Company are referred to as “Noncontrolling Common Units.” These Noncontrolling Common Units are held by other limited partners in the form of common units ("Other Common Units") and long term incentive plan units (“LTIP units”) issued pursuant to the STAG Industrial, Inc. 2011 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2011 Plan”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation of entities. The financial statements of the Company are presented on a consolidated basis for all periods presented.
8
Table of Contents
Revision of Previously Reported Consolidated Financial Statements
In connection with the preparation of the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company identified an error in the estimated useful life of a building acquired in the fourth quarter of 2014. As a result of the error, depreciation expense had been overstated and thereby rental property, net and equity were understated. The Company concluded that the amounts were not material to any of its previously issued consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, the Company revised these balances in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016
. These adjustments do not impact the Company’s cash balances for any of the reporting periods. The effects of this revision to the prior period consolidated financial statements are as follows (in thousands, except for per share data).
Effect of Revision As of and For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
As Previously Reported
Adjustment
As Revised
Consolidated Balance Sheet, September 30, 2016
Total equity
$
933,942
$
4,071
$
938,013
Consolidated Statement of Operations, Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Depreciation and amortization
$
32,020
$
(531
)
$
31,489
Total expenses
$
53,138
$
(531
)
$
52,607
Net income (loss)
$
(401
)
$
531
$
130
Net income (loss) attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc.
$
(185
)
$
505
$
320
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
$
(4,281
)
$
505
$
(3,776
)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted
$
(0.06
)
$
0.01
$
(0.05
)
Consolidated Statement of Operations, Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Depreciation and amortization
$
93,318
$
(1,593
)
$
91,725
Total expenses
$
170,564
$
(1,593
)
$
168,971
Net income
$
928
$
1,593
$
2,521
Net income attributable to STAG Industrial, Inc.
$
1,433
$
1,512
$
2,945
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
$
(9,770
)
$
1,512
$
(8,258
)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — basic and diluted
$
(0.14
)
$
0.02
$
(0.12
)
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Comprehensive income
$
2,462
$
531
$
2,993
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Comprehensive loss
$
(13,100
)
$
1,593
$
(11,507
)
Reclassifications and New Accounting Pronouncements
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.
In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-12,
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815):
Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities
. The purpose of this updated guidance is to better align a company’s financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted, and should be applied using a modified retrospective transition method to each period presented. This adoption method will require the Company to recognize the cumulative effect of initially applying the ASU as an adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year that an entity adopts the update. The adoption of ASU 2017-12 is not expected to materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company plans to adopt this standard effective January 1, 2018.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09,
Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting
, which provides updated guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award would require an entity to apply modification accounting under the topic. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years with early adoption permitted, and should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The adoption of ASU 2017-09 is not expected to materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company plans to adopt this standard effective January 1, 2018.
In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05,
Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets
, which provides guidance for recognizing gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with non-customers.
9
Table of Contents
The new standard was issued as part of the new revenue standard (ASU 2014-09, as discussed below), and defines “in substance nonfinancial asset,” unifies guidance related to partial sales of nonfinancial assets, eliminates rules specifically addressing sales of real estate, removes exceptions to the financial asset derecognition model, and clarifies the accounting for contributions of nonfinancial assets to joint ventures. As a result of the new guidance, the guidance specific to real estate sales in Subtopic 360-20 will be eliminated, and sales and partial sales of real estate assets will now be subject to the same derecognition model as all other nonfinancial assets. This standard is effective at the same time an entity adopts ASU 2014-09, and either the full retrospective approach or the modified retrospective approach may be used. The adoption of ASU 2017-05 is not expected to materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company plans to adopt this standard effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
. The new standard removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. This standard is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to early adopt this standard effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01,
Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business
. The new standard provides a screen to determine when a set of assets and activities is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired or disposed of is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those periods, with early adoption permitted, and should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. Upon the adoption of ASU 2017-01, it is expected that the majority of the Company's acquisitions will be accounted for as asset acquisitions, whereas under the current guidance the majority of the Company's acquisitions have been accounted for as business combinations. The most significant difference between the two accounting models that will impact the Company's consolidated financial statements is that in an asset acquisition, property acquisition costs are generally a component of the consideration transferred to acquire a group of assets and are capitalized as a component of the cost of the assets, whereas in a business combination, property acquisition costs are expensed and not included as part of the consideration transferred. The Company plans to adopt this standard effective January 1, 2018.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash
.
The new standard requires that the statement of cash flows explain the changes during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted, and should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. Upon the adoption of ASU 2016-18, the Company will reconcile both cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash in the accompanying Statements of Cash Flows, whereas under the current guidance the Company explains the changes during the period for cash and cash equivalents only. The Company expects that it will adopt the standard effective January 1, 2018.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
, which provides clarified guidance on the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The Company elected to early adopt this standard effective July 1, 2016, and the effects of this standard were applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented. The effect of the change in accounting principle was an increase in net cash provided by operating activities of approximately
$0.8 million
and
$2.0 million
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and a corresponding increase in net cash used in financing activities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 related to the payment of loan prepayment fees and costs.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
, which sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases for both parties to a contract (i.e. lessees and lessors). Topic 842 supersedes the previous leases standard, Topic 840,
Leases
. The new standard requires lessees to apply a dual approach, classifying leases as either finance or operating leases based on the principle of whether or not the lease is effectively a financed purchase by the lessee. This classification will determine whether lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest method or on a straight line basis over the term of the lease, respectively. A lessee is also required to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification. Leases with a term of 12 months or less will be accounted for similar to existing guidance for operating leases today. The new standard requires lessors to account for leases using an approach that is substantially equivalent to existing guidance for sales-type leases, direct financing leases and operating leases. ASU 2016-02 is expected to impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements as the Company has certain operating and land lease
10
Table of Contents
arrangements for which it is the lessee, which will result in the recording of a right of use asset and the related lease liability. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition and will require application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations, and expects to adopt the standard effective January 1, 2019.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01,
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10)
. The amendments in ASU 2016-01 address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The standard primarily affects the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective for the annual periods beginning after December 31, 2017 and for annual periods and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for all financial statements of fiscal years and interim periods that have not yet been issued. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 is not expected to materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company expects that it will adopt the standard effective January 1, 2018.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606)
. ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model requiring a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. While lease contracts with customers, which constitute a vast majority of the Company's revenues, are specifically excluded from the model's scope, certain of the Company's revenue streams may be impacted by the new guidance. Once the new guidance setting forth principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases (ASU 2016-02, as discussed above) goes into effect, the new revenue standard may apply to executory costs and other components of revenue due under leases that are deemed to be non-lease components (such as common area maintenance and provision of utilities), even when the revenue for such activities is not separately stipulated in the lease. In that case, revenue from these items previously recognized on a straight-line basis under current lease guidance would be recognized under the new revenue guidance as the related services are delivered. As a result, while the total revenue recognized over time would not differ under the new guidance, the recognition pattern would be different. The Company is in the process of evaluating the significance of the difference in the recognition pattern that would result from this change upon the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019. In adopting ASU 2014-09, companies may use either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach. Additionally, this guidance requires improved disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. ASU 2014-09 is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 is not expected to materially impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company expects that it will adopt the standard effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach.
Tenant Accounts Receivable, net
As of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company had an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately
$0
and
$0.2 million
, respectively.
As of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company had accrued rental income of approximately
$22.8 million
and
$18.4 million
, respectively. As of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company had an allowance on accrued rental income of
$0
and
$0
, respectively.
As of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company had approximately
$12.0 million
and
$9.0 million
, respectively, of total lease security deposits available in the form of existing letters of credit, which are not reflected on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company had approximately
$7.1 million
and
$5.4 million
, respectively, of lease security deposits available in cash, which are included in cash and cash equivalents on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, and approximately
$0.7 million
and
$0.4 million
, respectively, of lease security deposits available in cash, which are included in restricted cash on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. These funds may be used to settle tenant accounts receivables in the event of a default under the related lease. As of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company's total liability associated with these lease security deposits was approximately
$7.8 million
and
$5.8 million
, respectively, and is included in tenant prepaid rent and security deposits on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
11
Table of Contents
Related Parties
As of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company had approximately
$9,000
and
$48,000
, respectively, of amounts due from related parties, which are included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Revenue Recognition
Tenant Recoveries
The Company estimates that real estate taxes, which are the responsibility of certain tenants under the terms of their leases and are not reflected on the Company's consolidated financial statements, were approximately
$2.9 million
,
$9.2 million
,
$2.7 million
and
$7.9 million
for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively. These amounts would have been the maximum real estate tax expense of the Company, excluding any penalties or interest, had the tenants not met their contractual obligations for these periods.
Termination Income
On March 27, 2017, the tenant at the Buena Vista, VA property exercised its early lease termination option per the terms of the lease agreement. The option provided that the tenant's lease terminate effective March 31, 2018 and required the tenant to pay a termination fee of approximately
$0.5 million
. The termination fee is being recognized on a straight-line basis from March 27, 2017 through the relinquishment of the space on March 31, 2018. The termination fee income of approximately
$0.1 million
and
$0.3 million
is included in rental income on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
.
On February 9, 2017, the Company entered into a lease termination agreement with the tenant located at the Belvidere, IL building. The agreement provided that the tenant’s lease terminate effective February 9, 2017 and required the tenant to pay a termination fee of
$54,000
. The full termination fee was recognized on February 9, 2017 and is included in rental income on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
.
Approximately
$0.2 million
and
$0.6 million
of termination fee income related to the Golden, CO property, the tenant at which exercised its termination option on December 21, 2016, is included in rental income on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
.
Taxes
Federal Income Taxes
The Company's taxable REIT subsidiaries recognized a net loss of approximately
$0.2 million
,
$0.4 million
,
$0.1 million
and
$0.1 million
for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively, which has been included on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
State and Local Income, Excise, and Franchise Tax
State and local income, excise, and franchise taxes in the amount of
$0.3 million
,
$0.7 million
,
$0.2 million
and
$0.7 million
have been recorded in other expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively.
Uncertain Tax Positions
As of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, there were
no
liabilities for uncertain tax positions.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Management believes the current credit risk portfolio is reasonably well diversified and does not contain any unusual concentration of credit risk.
12
Table of Contents
3. Rental Property
The following table summarizes the components of rental property as of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
.
Rental Property (in thousands)
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Land
$
321,365
$
272,162
Buildings, net of accumulated depreciation of $152,575 and $125,971, respectivel
y
1,695,332
(1)
1,408,406
(1)
Tenant improvements, net of accumulated depreciation of $32,075 and $28,388, respectively
30,895
24,974
Building and land improvements, net of accumulated depreciation of $49,699 and $33,054, respectivel
y
134,607
107,463
Construction in progress
19,516
9,298
Deferred leasing intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $273,602 and $237,456, respectively
318,915
294,533
Total rental property, net
$
2,520,630
$
2,116,836
(1)
Includes
one
building in redevelopment.
Acquisitions
The following table summarizes the acquisitions of the Company during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
.
Location of Property
Square Feet
Buildings
Purchase Price
(in thousands)
Jacksonville, FL
1,025,720
4
$
34,264
Sparks, NV
174,763
1
8,380
Salisbury, NC
288,000
1
8,250
Franklin Township, NJ
183,000
1
12,800
Milford, CT
200,000
1
12,762
Bedford Heights, OH
173,034
1
7,622
Redford, MI
135,728
1
7,769
Warren, MI
154,377
1
7,940
Three months ended March 31, 2017
2,334,622
11
99,787
Waukegan, IL
261,075
2
13,850
Gaffney, SC
226,968
1
7,200
Dayton, OH
569,966
1
29,750
Belvidere, IL
336,204
1
22,867
San Diego, CA
205,440
1
19,362
Edwardsville, KS
270,869
1
16,270
Pedricktown, NJ
245,749
1
16,000
Walton, KY
224,921
1
11,450
Rock Hill, SC
275,000
1
6,675
Laredo, TX
206,810
1
13,500
Clinton, PA
297,200
1
23,650
Batavia, IL
102,500
1
5,900
Wallingford, CT
105,000
1
8,200
Rockwall, TX
389,546
1
28,600
Houston, TX
232,800
3
25,000
Lebanon, PA
211,358
1
7,950
Maple Grove, MN
108,628
1
10,031
Romulus, MI
303,760
1
19,351
Three months ended June 30, 2017
4,573,794
21
285,606
Stone Mountain, GA
78,000
1
4,175
York, PA
382,886
1
18,981
Pittston, PA
437,446
1
23,950
O'Fallon, MO
109,854
1
5,740
Belleville, MI
160,464
1
8,641
Columbus, OH
147,645
1
6,954
Groveport, OH
320,657
1
13,643
Las Vegas, NV
34,916
1
4,642
Mooresville, NC
499,200
1
25,750
Swedesboro, NJ
123,962
1
7,250
Three months ended September 30, 2017
2,295,030
10
119,726
Nine months ended September 30, 2017
9,203,446
42
$
505,119
13
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the allocation of the consideration paid at the date of acquisition during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
for the acquired assets and liabilities in connection with the acquisitions identified in the table above.
Acquired Assets and Liabilities
Purchase Price (in thousands)
Weighted Average Amortization Period (years) of Intangibles at Acquisition
Land
$
52,453
N/A
Buildings
335,391
N/A
Tenant improvements
8,288
N/A
Building and land improvements
26,962
N/A
Deferred leasing intangibles - In-place leases
51,444
8.3
Deferred leasing intangibles - Tenant relationships
21,749
10.7
Deferred leasing intangibles - Above market leases
13,063
10.8
Deferred leasing intangibles - Below market leases
(4,231
)
8.8
Total purchase price
$
505,119
On
May 31, 2017
, the Company acquired a property located in
San Diego, CA
for approximately
$19.4 million
. As partial consideration for the property acquired, the Company granted
687,827
Other Common Units with a fair value of approximately
$18.6 million
. For a discussion of the method used to determine the fair value of the Other Common Units issued, see Note 7.
The table below sets forth the results of operations for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
, for the buildings acquired during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
, included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition.
Results of Operations (in thousands)
Three months ended September 30, 2017
Nine months ended September 30, 2017
Total revenue
$
9,206
$
14,817
Property acquisition costs
$
1,309
$
4,517
Net income (loss)
$
332
$
(2,767
)
The following tables set forth pro forma information for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
. The below pro forma information does not purport to represent what the actual results of operations of the Company would have been had the acquisitions occurred on the first day of the applicable reporting period, nor do they purport to predict the results of operations of future periods. The pro forma information has not been adjusted for property sales.
Pro Forma (in thousands)
(1)
Nine months ended September 30, 2017
Nine months ended September 30, 2016
Total revenue
$
237,683
$
223,024
Net income (loss)
(2)
$
30,745
$
(8,418
)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
22,161
$
(18,643
)
(1)
The unaudited pro forma information for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
is presented as if the buildings acquired during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
were completed on January 1,
2016
and January 1,
2015
, respectively.
(2)
The net income for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
excludes approximately
$4.5 million
of property acquisition costs related to the acquisition of buildings that closed during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
, and the net loss for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
was adjusted to include these acquisition costs. Net loss for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
excludes approximately
$2.7 million
of property acquisition costs related to the acquisition of buildings that closed during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
.
Dispositions
During the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
, the Company sold
nine
buildings comprised of approximately
1.0 million
square feet with a net book value of approximately
$24.3 million
to third parties. These buildings contributed approximately
$0.1 million
,
$1.3 million
,
$0.9 million
and
$3.0 million
to revenue for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively. These buildings contributed approximately
$(0.1) million
,
$0.1 million
,
$0.1 million
and
$0.4 million
to
net income (loss) (exclusive of loss on impairment and gain on the sales of rental property, net)
for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively. Net proceeds from the sales of rental property were approximately
$43.5 million
and the Company recognized a gain on the sales of rental property, net of approximately
$19.2 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
. These dispositions were accounted for under the full accrual method.
14
Table of Contents
Assets Held for Sale
As of
September 30, 2017
, the related land, building and improvements, net, and deferred leasing intangibles, net, of approximately
$0.7 million
,
$4.2 million
, and
$0.8 million
, respectively, for
one
building located in Charlotte, NC was classified as assets held for sale, net on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. This building contributed approximately
$0.2 million
,
$0.5 million
,
$0.2 million
and
$0.2 million
to revenue for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively. This building contributed approximately
$15,000
,
$46,000
,
$15,000
and
$(41,000)
to net income (loss) for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively.
Involuntary Conversion
During the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
, the Company wrote down a building in the amount of approximately
$0
and
$0.8 million
, respectively, related to the involuntary conversion event that occurred on September 1, 2016. The cumulative write down of the building since the involuntary conversion event was approximately
$1.5 million
as of
September 30, 2017
. The Company recognized a loss on involuntary conversion of approximately
$0
and
$0.3 million
during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
, respectively. As of
September 30, 2017
, the remaining proceeds receivable from the insurance company are estimated to be approximately
$0.5 million
, which are included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Deferred Leasing Intangibles
The following table sets forth the deferred leasing intangibles on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
.
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Deferred Leasing Intangibles (in thousands)
Gross
Accumulated Amortization
Net
Gross
Accumulated Amortization
Net
Above market leases
$
79,614
$
(36,310
)
$
43,304
$
70,668
$
(32,868
)
$
37,800
Other intangible lease assets
512,903
(237,292
)
275,611
461,321
(204,588
)
256,733
Total deferred leasing intangible assets
$
592,517
$
(273,602
)
$
318,915
$
531,989
$
(237,456
)
$
294,533
Below market leases
$
33,614
$
(12,487
)
$
21,127
$
30,791
$
(10,450
)
$
20,341
Total deferred leasing intangible liabilities
$
33,614
$
(12,487
)
$
21,127
$
30,791
$
(10,450
)
$
20,341
The following table sets forth the amortization expense and the net decrease to rental income for the amortization of deferred leasing intangibles during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
.
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
Deferred Leasing Intangibles Amortization (in thousands)
2017
2016
2017
2016
Net decrease to rental income related to above and below market lease amortization
$
1,318
$
1,564
$
3,873
$
4,751
Amortization expense related to other intangible lease assets
$
17,934
$
16,594
$
53,747
$
48,853
The following table sets forth the amortization of deferred leasing intangibles over the next five calendar years beginning with
2017
as of
September 30, 2017
.
Year
Amortization Expense Related to Other Intangible Lease Assets (in thousands)
Net Decrease to Rental Income Related to Above and Below Market Lease Amortization (in thousands)
Remainder of 2017
$
18,040
$
1,322
2018
$
62,037
$
4,330
2019
$
47,856
$
3,736
2020
$
37,759
$
3,326
2021
$
27,703
$
1,945
15
Table of Contents
4. Debt
The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s outstanding indebtedness, including borrowings under the Company’s unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes, and mortgage notes as of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
.
Loan
Principal Outstanding as of September 30, 2017 (in thousands)
Principal Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands)
Interest
Rate
(1)
Maturity Date
Prepayment Terms
(2)
Unsecured credit facility:
Unsecured Credit Facility
(3)
$
245,000
$
28,000
L + 1.15%
Dec-18-2019
i
Total unsecured credit facility
245,000
28,000
Unsecured term loans:
Unsecured Term Loan C
150,000
150,000
L + 1.30%
Sep-29-2020
i
Unsecured Term Loan B
150,000
150,000
L + 1.30%
Mar-21-2021
i
Unsecured Term Loan A
150,000
150,000
L + 1.30%
Mar-31-2022
i
Unsecured Term Loan D
(4)
—
—
L + 1.30%
Jan-04-2023
i
Total unsecured term loans
450,000
450,000
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs
(3,934
)
(3,392
)
Total carrying value unsecured term loans
446,066
446,608
Unsecured notes:
Series F Unsecured Notes
100,000
100,000
3.98
%
Jan-05-2023
ii
Series A Unsecured Notes
50,000
50,000
4.98
%
Oct-1-2024
ii
Series D Unsecured Notes
100,000
100,000
4.32
%
Feb-20-2025
ii
Series B Unsecured Notes
50,000
50,000
4.98
%
Jul-1-2026
ii
Series C Unsecured Notes
80,000
80,000
4.42
%
Dec-30-2026
ii
Series E Unsecured Notes
20,000
20,000
4.42
%
Feb-20-2027
ii
Total unsecured notes
400,000
400,000
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs
(1,832
)
(2,034
)
Total carrying value unsecured notes
398,168
397,966
Mortgage notes (secured debt):
Union Fidelity Life Insurance Company
—
5,384
5.81
%
Apr-30-2017
iii
Webster Bank, National Association
—
2,853
3.66
%
May-29-2017
iv
Webster Bank, National Association
—
3,073
3.64
%
May-31-2017
iv
Wells Fargo, National Association
—
4,043
5.90
%
Aug-1-2017
v
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company -1 Facility
—
35,320
6.50
%
Feb-1-2018
vi
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company -2 Facility
—
36,892
5.75
%
Feb-1-2018
vi
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company -3 Facility
—
16,141
5.88
%
Feb-1-2018
vi
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association CMBS Loan
55,366
56,608
4.31
%
Dec-1-2022
vii
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
3,933
4,012
4.78
%
Dec-15-2023
iv
Total mortgage notes
59,299
164,326
Total unamortized fair market value premiums
63
112
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs
(667
)
(873
)
Total carrying value mortgage notes
58,695
163,565
Total / weighted average interest rate
(5)
$
1,147,929
$
1,036,139
3.44
%
(1)
Interest rate as of
September 30, 2017
. At
September 30, 2017
, the one-month LIBOR (“L”) was
1.23222%
. The interest rate is not adjusted to include the amortization of deferred financing fees or debt issuance costs incurred in obtaining debt or any unamortized fair market value premiums. The spread over the applicable rate for the Company's unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loans is based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the respective loan agreements.
(2)
Prepayment terms consist of (i) pre-payable with no penalty; (ii) pre-payable with penalty; (iii) pre-payable without penalty
two
months prior to the maturity date; (iv) pre-payable without penalty
three
months prior to the maturity date; (v) pre-payable without penalty
three
months prior to the maturity date, however can be defeased; (vi) pre-payable without penalty
six
months prior to the maturity date; and (vii) pre-payable without penalty
three
months prior to the maturity date, however can be defeased beginning January 1, 2016.
(3)
The capacity of the unsecured credit facility is
$450.0 million
. Deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization related to the unsecured credit facility of approximately
$1.7 million
and
$2.3 million
is included in prepaid expenses and other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, respectively.
(4)
Capacity of
$150.0 million
, which the Company has until July 27, 2018 to draw.
(5)
The weighted average interest rate was calculated using the fixed interest rate swapped on the current notional amount of
$450.0 million
of debt, and is not adjusted to include the amortization of deferred financing fees or debt issuance costs incurred in obtaining debt or any unamortized fair market value premiums.
The aggregate undrawn nominal commitment on the unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loans as of
September 30, 2017
was approximately
$349.1 million
, including issued letters of credit. The Company's actual borrowing capacity at any given point
16
Table of Contents
in time may be less and is restricted to a maximum amount based on the Company's debt covenant compliance. Total accrued interest for the Company's indebtedness was approximately
$5.3 million
and
$5.7 million
as of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, respectively, and is included in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The table below sets forth the costs included in interest expense related to the Company's debt arrangements on the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
.
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
Costs Included in Interest Expense (in thousands)
2017
2016
2017
2016
Amortization of deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs and fair market value premiums
$
546
$
428
$
1,553
$
1,208
Facility fees and unused fees
$
286
$
347
$
839
$
1,035
On August 1, 2017, the
three
mortgage notes held with Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, in which multiple properties served as collateral for the mortgage notes, were paid in full.
On July 28, 2017, the Company entered into a
$150.0 million
unsecured term loan agreement ("Unsecured Term Loan D"). As of September 30, 2017, the interest rate on the Unsecured Term Loan D was LIBOR plus a spread of
1.3%
based on the Company's consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the loan agreement. Unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the loan agreement, the Unsecured Term Loan D will mature on January 4, 2023. The Unsecured Term Loan D has an accordion feature that allows the Company to increase its borrowing capacity to
$250.0 million
, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and lender consents. The agreement includes a delayed draw feature that allows the Company to draw up to
six
advances of at least
$25.0 million
each until July 27, 2018. To the extent that the Company does not request advances of the $150.0 million of aggregate commitments by July 27, 2018, the unadvanced commitments terminate. The Company incurred approximately
$1.0 million
in deferred financing fees associated with the Unsecured Term Loan D, which are being amortized through the maturity date. The Company also is required to pay an annual fee of
$35,000
. The Unsecured Term Loan D has an unused commitment fee equal to
0.15%
of its unused commitments, which begins to accrue on October 26, 2017 and are due and payable monthly until the earlier of (i) the date that commitments of $150.0 million have been fully advanced, (ii) July 27, 2018, and (iii) the date that commitments of $150.0 million have been reduced to zero pursuant to the Company's ability to terminate the aggregate commitments at any time upon notice. The Company and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership are guarantors of the Unsecured Term Loan D. The agreement also contains financial and other covenants substantially similar to the covenants in the Company's unsecured credit facility.
On July 28, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment to its unsecured credit facility agreement and amendments to its unsecured term loan agreements to conform certain provisions to the Unsecured Term Loan D agreement.
On May 30, 2017, the mortgage note held with Wells Fargo, National Association, in which the property located in Yorkville, WI served as collateral for the mortgage note, was paid in full.
On March 3, 2017, the mortgage note held with Webster Bank, National Association, in which the property located in East Windsor, CT served as collateral for the mortgage note, was paid in full.
On March 1, 2017, the mortgage note held with Webster Bank, National Association, in which the property located in Portland, ME served as collateral for the mortgage note, was paid in full.
On March 1, 2017, the mortgage note held with Union Fidelity Life Insurance Company, in which the property located in Hazelwood, MO served as collateral for the mortgage note, was paid in full.
Financial Covenant Considerations
The Company was in compliance with all financial and other covenants as of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
related to its unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes, and mortgage notes. The real estate net book value of the properties that are collateral for the Company’s debt arrangements was approximately
$91.4 million
and
$229.9 million
at
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, respectively, and is limited to senior, property-level secured debt financing arrangements.
17
Table of Contents
Fair Value of Debt
The fair value of the Company’s debt was determined by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings for loans with similar remaining maturities, similar terms, and similar loan-to-value ratios. The discount rates ranged from approximately
2.38%
to
4.25%
and
1.92%
to
4.85%
at
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, respectively, and were applied to each individual debt instrument. The applicable fair value guidance establishes a three tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. The fair value of the Company’s debt is based on Level 3 inputs. The following table presents the aggregate principal outstanding of the Company’s debt and the corresponding estimate of fair value as of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
(in thousands).
September 30, 2017
December 31, 2016
Principal Outstanding
Fair Value
Principal Outstanding
Fair Value
Unsecured credit facility
$
245,000
$
245,000
$
28,000
$
28,000
Unsecured term loans
450,000
450,000
450,000
450,000
Unsecured notes
400,000
417,210
400,000
399,091
Mortgage notes
59,299
60,788
164,326
166,099
Total principal amount
1,154,299
$
1,172,998
1,042,326
$
1,043,190
Add: Total unamortized fair market value premiums
63
112
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs
(6,433
)
(6,299
)
Total carrying value
$
1,147,929
$
1,036,139
5. Use of Derivative Financial Instruments
Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives
The Company’s use of derivative instruments is limited to the utilization of interest rate swaps to manage interest rate risk exposure on existing and future liabilities and not for speculative purposes. The principal objective of such arrangements is to minimize the risks and related costs associated with the Company’s operating and financial structure.
The following table details the Company’s outstanding interest rate swaps as of
September 30, 2017
. All of the Company's interest rate swaps are designated as qualifying cash flow hedges.
Interest Rate
Derivative Counterparty
Trade Date
Effective Date
Notional Amount
(in thousands)
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Pay Fixed Interest Rate
Receive Variable Interest Rate
Maturity Date
Regions Bank
Mar-01-2013
Mar-01-2013
$
25,000
$
194
1.3300
%
One-month L
Feb-14-2020
Capital One, N.A.
Jun-13-2013
Jul-01-2013
$
50,000
$
(25
)
1.6810
%
One-month L
Feb-14-2020
Capital One, N.A.
Jun-13-2013
Aug-01-2013
$
25,000
$
(26
)
1.7030
%
One-month L
Feb-14-2020
Regions Bank
Sep-30-2013
Feb-03-2014
$
25,000
$
(196
)
1.9925
%
One-month L
Feb-14-2020
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Oct-14-2015
Sep-29-2016
$
25,000
$
255
1.3830
%
One-month L
Sep-29-2020
PNC Bank, N.A.
Oct-14-2015
Sep-29-2016
$
50,000
$
497
1.3906
%
One-month L
Sep-29-2020
Regions Bank
Oct-14-2015
Sep-29-2016
$
35,000
$
354
1.3858
%
One-month L
Sep-29-2020
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Oct-14-2015
Sep-29-2016
$
25,000
$
247
1.3950
%
One-month L
Sep-29-2020
Capital One, N.A.
Oct-14-2015
Sep-29-2016
$
15,000
$
148
1.3950
%
One-month L
Sep-29-2020
Royal Bank of Canada
Jan-08-2015
Mar-20-2015
$
25,000
$
52
1.7090
%
One-month L
Mar-21-2021
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Jan-08-2015
Mar-20-2015
$
25,000
$
50
1.7105
%
One-month L
Mar-21-2021
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Jan-08-2015
Sep-10-2017
$
100,000
$
(1,550
)
2.2255
%
One-month L
Mar-21-2021
Wells Fargo, N.A.
Jan-08-2015
Mar-20-2015
$
25,000
$
19
1.8280
%
One-month L
Mar-31-2022
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Jan-08-2015
Feb-14-2020
$
25,000
$
(196
)
2.4535
%
One-month L
Mar-31-2022
Regions Bank
Jan-08-2015
Feb-14-2020
$
50,000
$
(413
)
2.4750
%
One-month L
Mar-31-2022
Capital One, N.A.
Jan-08-2015
Feb-14-2020
$
50,000
$
(467
)
2.5300
%
One-month L
Mar-31-2022
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Jul-20-2017
Oct-30-2017
$
25,000
$
75
1.8485
%
One-month L
Jan-04-2023
Royal Bank of Canada
Jul-20-2017
Oct-30-2017
$
25,000
$
76
1.8505
%
One-month L
Jan-04-2023
Wells Fargo, N.A.
Jul-20-2017
Oct-30-2017
$
25,000
$
76
1.8505
%
One-month L
Jan-04-2023
PNC Bank, N.A.
Jul-20-2017
Oct-30-2017
$
25,000
$
75
1.8485
%
One-month L
Jan-04-2023
PNC Bank, N.A.
Jul-20-2017
Oct-30-2017
$
50,000
$
152
1.8475
%
One-month L
Jan-04-2023
18
Table of Contents
The fair value of the interest rate swaps outstanding as of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
was as follows.
Balance Sheet Line Item (in thousands)
Notional Amount September 30, 2017
Fair Value
September 30, 2017
Notional Amount December 31, 2016
Fair Value December 31, 2016
Interest rate swaps-Asset
$
400,000
$
2,270
$
300,000
$
1,471
Interest rate swaps-Liability
$
325,000
$
(2,873
)
$
375,000
$
(2,438
)
Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
The Company’s objectives in using interest rate swaps are to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as qualifying cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss and will be reclassified to interest expense in the period that the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is recognized directly in earnings into interest expense. During the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, the Company recorded a gain of approximately
$0.1 million
,
$0.1 million
,
$0
and
$0
, respectively, of hedge ineffectiveness in earnings due to short-term, partial mismatches in notional amounts.
Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivatives designated as qualifying cash flow hedges will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the Company's variable rate debt. The Company estimates that approximately
$1.6 million
will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss as an increase to interest expense over the next 12 months.
The table below details the location in the financial statements of the gain or loss recognized on interest rate swaps designated as qualifying cash flow hedges for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
(in thousands).
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Amount of income (loss) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss on interest rate swaps (effective portion)
$
316
$
2,159
$
(1,126
)
$
(16,206
)
Amount of loss reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income (loss) as interest expense (effective portion)
$
282
$
704
$
1,426
$
2,178
Amount of gain recognized in interest expense (ineffective portion)
$
61
$
—
$
88
$
—
Credit-risk-related Contingent Features
The Company has agreements with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where the Company could be declared in default on its derivative obligations if repayment of the underlying indebtedness is accelerated by the lender due to the Company's default on the indebtedness.
As of
September 30, 2017
, derivatives that were in a net liability position and subject to credit-risk-related contingent features had a termination value of approximately
$1.8 million
, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for nonperformance risk. As of
September 30, 2017
, the Company had not breached the provisions of these agreements and has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the Company had breached any of its provisions at
September 30, 2017
, it could have been required to settle its obligations under the agreement of the interest rate swaps in a liability position plus accrued interest for approximately
$1.8 million
.
Fair Value of Interest Rate Swaps
The Company’s valuation of the interest rate swaps is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs including interest rate curves.
The Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
19
Table of Contents
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The following sets forth the Company’s financial instruments that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016
.
Fair Value Measurements as of
September 30, 2017 Using
Balance Sheet Line Item (in thousands)
Fair Value
September 30, 2017
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Interest rate swaps-Asset
$
2,270
$
—
$
2,270
$
—
Interest rate swaps-Liability
$
(2,873
)
$
—
$
(2,873
)
$
—
Fair Value Measurements as of
December 31, 2016 Using
Balance Sheet Line Item (in thousands)
Fair Value December 31, 2016
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Interest rate swaps-Asset
$
1,471
$
—
$
1,471
$
—
Interest rate swaps-Liability
$
(2,438
)
$
—
$
(2,438
)
$
—
6. Equity
Preferred Stock
The table below sets forth the Company’s outstanding preferred stock issuances as of
September 30, 2017
.
Preferred Stock Issuances
Issuance Date
Number of Shares
Liquidation Value Per Share
Interest Rate
6.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B Preferred Stock")
April 16, 2013
2,800,000
$
25.00
6.625
%
6.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series C Preferred Stock")
March 17, 2016
3,000,000
$
25.00
6.875
%
20
Table of Contents
The tables below set forth the dividends attributable to the Company's outstanding preferred stock issuances during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
Quarter Ended 2017
Declaration Date
Series B
Preferred Stock Per Share
Series C
Preferred Stock Per Share
Payment Date
September 30
July 31, 2017
$
0.4140625
$
0.4296875
September 29, 2017
June 30
May 1, 2017
0.4140625
0.4296875
June 30, 2017
March 31
February 15, 2017
0.4140625
0.4296875
March 31, 2017
Total
$
1.2421875
$
1.2890625
Quarter Ended 2016
Declaration Date
Series A Preferred Stock Per Share
Series B Preferred Stock Per Share
Series C Preferred Stock Per Share
Payment Date
December 31
November 2, 2016
(1)
$
0.19375
(1)
$
0.4140625
$
0.4296875
December 30, 2016
September 30
August 1, 2016
0.56250
0.4140625
0.4296875
September 30, 2016
June 30
May 2, 2016
0.56250
0.4140625
0.4965300
(2)
June 30, 2016
March 31
February 22, 2016
0.56250
0.4140625
—
March 31, 2016
Total
$
1.88125
$
1.6562500
$
1.3559050
(1)
On November 2, 2016, the Company redeemed all of the outstanding shares of the 9.0% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, at a cash redemption price of
$25.00
per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to but excluding the redemption date, without interest.
(2)
Dividends for the Series C Preferred Stock were accrued and cumulative from and including March 17, 2016 to the first payment date on June 30, 2016.
On
November 2, 2017
, the Company’s board of directors declared the Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock dividend for the quarter ending
December 31, 2017
at a quarterly rate of
$0.4140625
per share and
$0.4296875
per share, respectively.
Common Stock
The following sets forth the Company’s at-the market ("ATM") common stock offering program as of
September 30, 2017
.
ATM Stock Offering Program
Date
Maximum Aggregate Offering Price (in thousands)
Aggregate Common Stock Available as of
September 30, 2017 (in thousands)
2017 $300 million ATM
April 7, 2017
$
300,000
$
77,592
The tables below set forth the activity under the ATM common stock offering programs during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and the year ended
December 31, 2016
, respectively (in thousands, except share data).
Nine months ended September 30, 2017
ATM Stock Offering Program
Shares
Sold
Weighted Average Price Per Share
Gross
Proceeds
Sales
Agents’ Fee
Net
Proceeds
2017 $300 million ATM
8,366,212
$
26.58
$
222,408
$
2,666
$
219,742
2016 $228 million ATM
(1)
4,799,784
$
24.42
$
117,216
$
1,604
$
115,612
Total/weighted average
13,165,996
$
25.80
$
339,624
$
4,270
$
335,354
(1)
This program ended before
September 30, 2017
.
Year ended December 31, 2016
ATM Stock Offering Program
Shares
Sold
Weighted Average Price Per Share
Gross
Proceeds
Sales
Agents’ Fee
Net
Proceeds
2016 $228 million ATM
(1)
4,763,838
$
23.28
$
110,887
$
1,550
$
109,337
2016 $200 million ATM
(1)
7,326,200
$
23.45
171,782
2,429
169,353
Total/weighted average
12,090,038
$
23.38
$
282,669
$
3,979
$
278,690
(1)
These programs ended before
September 30, 2017
.
Subsequent to
September 30, 2017
, the Company sold
180,300
shares under its ATM common stock offering program for gross proceeds of approximately
$5.1 million
.
21
Table of Contents
Dividends
The table below sets forth the dividends attributable to the common stock that were declared or paid during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
Month Ended 2017
Declaration Date
Record Date
Per Share
Payment Date
December 31
July 31, 2017
December 29, 2017
$
0.117500
January 16, 2018
November 30
July 31, 2017
November 30, 2017
0.117500
December 15, 2017
October 31
July 31, 2017
October 31, 2017
0.117500
November 15, 2017
September 30
May 1, 2017
September 29, 2017
0.117500
October 16, 2017
August 31
May 1, 2017
August 31, 2017
0.117500
September 15, 2017
July 31
May 1, 2017
July 31, 2017
0.117500
August 15, 2017
June 30
February 15, 2017
June 30, 2017
0.116667
July 17, 2017
May 31
February 15, 2017
May 31, 2017
0.116667
June 15, 2017
April 30
February 15, 2017
April 28, 2017
0.116667
May 15, 2017
March 31
November 2, 2016
March 31, 2017
0.116667
April 17, 2017
February 28
November 2, 2016
February 28, 2017
0.116667
March 15, 2017
January 31
November 2, 2016
January 31, 2017
0.116667
February 15, 2017
Total
$
1.405002
Month Ended 2016
Declaration Date
Record Date
Per Share
Payment Date
December 31
August 1, 2016
December 30, 2016
$
0.115833
January 17, 2017
November 30
August 1, 2016
November 30, 2016
0.115833
December 15, 2016
October 31
August 1, 2016
October 31, 2016
0.115833
November 15, 2016
September 30
May 2, 2016
September 30, 2016
0.115833
October 17, 2016
August 31
May 2, 2016
August 31, 2016
0.115833
September 15, 2016
July 31
May 2, 2016
July 29, 2016
0.115833
August 15, 2016
June 30
February 22, 2016
June 30, 2016
0.115833
July 15, 2016
May 31
February 22, 2016
May 31, 2016
0.115833
June 15, 2016
April 30
February 22, 2016
April 29, 2016
0.115833
May 16, 2016
March 31
October 22, 2015
March 31, 2016
0.115833
April 15, 2016
February 29
October 22, 2015
February 29, 2016
0.115833
March 15, 2016
January 31
October 22, 2015
January 29, 2016
0.115833
February 16, 2016
Total
$
1.389996
On
November 2, 2017
, the Company’s board of directors declared the common stock dividend for the months ending
January 31, 2018
,
February 28, 2018
and
March 31, 2018
at a monthly rate of
$0.118333
per share of common stock.
Restricted Stock-Based Compensation
Restricted shares of common stock granted on January 6, 2017, subject to the recipient’s continued employment, will vest in
four
equal installments on January 1 of each year beginning in 2018. The following table summarizes activity related to the Company’s unvested restricted shares of common stock for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
Unvested Restricted Shares of Common Stock
Shares
Balance at December 31, 2015
271,115
Granted
101,289
(1)
Vested
(98,746
)
Forfeited
(1,321
)
Balance at December 31, 2016
272,337
Granted
75,001
(2)
Vested
(109,209
)
Forfeited
(922
)
Balance at September 30, 2017
237,207
(1)
The grant date fair value per share was
$17.98
.
(2)
The grant date fair value per share was
$24.41
.
The unrecognized compensation expense associated with the Company’s restricted shares of common stock at
September 30, 2017
was approximately
$3.3 million
and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
2.4 years
.
22
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the fair value at vesting for the restricted shares of common stock vested during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
.
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Vested restricted shares of common stock
—
—
109,209
98,746
Fair value of vested restricted shares of common stock (in thousands)
$
—
$
—
$
2,591
$
1,813
7. Noncontrolling Interest
The table below summarizes the activity for noncontrolling interest in the Company for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
LTIP Units
Other
Common Units
Total
Noncontrolling Common Units
Noncontrolling Interest
Balance at December 31, 2015
1,610,105
1,915,872
3,525,977
4.9
%
Granted/Issued
176,396
—
176,396
N/A
Forfeited
—
—
—
N/A
Conversions from LTIP units to Other Common Units
(209,985
)
209,985
—
N/A
Redemptions from Other Common Units to common stock
—
(68,492
)
(68,492
)
N/A
Balance at December 31, 2016
1,576,516
2,057,365
3,633,881
4.3
%
Granted/Issued
126,239
687,827
814,066
N/A
Forfeited
—
—
—
N/A
Conversions from LTIP units to Other Common Units
(231,816
)
231,816
—
N/A
Redemptions from Other Common Units to common stock
—
(300,991
)
(300,991
)
N/A
Balance at September 30, 2017
1,470,939
2,676,017
4,146,956
4.2
%
LTIP Units
LTIP units granted on January 6, 2017 to independent directors, subject to the recipient’s continued service, will vest on January 1, 2018. LTIP units granted on January 6, 2017 to certain senior executive officers and senior employees, subject to the recipient’s continued employment, will vest quarterly over
four
years, with the first vesting date having been March 31, 2017.
The fair value of the LTIP units at the date of grant was determined by a lattice-binomial option-pricing model based on a Monte Carlo simulation. The fair value of the LTIP units are based on Level 3 inputs and are non-recurring fair value measurements. The table below sets forth the assumptions used in valuing such LTIP units granted during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
.
LTIP Units
Assumptions
Grant date
January 6, 2017
Expected term (years)
10
Expected volatility
23.0
%
Expected dividend yield
6.0
%
Risk-free interest rate
1.61
%
Fair value of LTIP units at issuance (in thousands)
$
2,924
LTIP units at issuance
126,239
Fair value unit price per LTIP unit at issuance
$
23.16
The following table summarizes activity related to the Company’s unvested LTIP units for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
Unvested LTIP Units
LTIP Units
Balance at December 31, 2015
534,910
Granted
176,396
Vested
(307,883
)
Forfeited
—
Balance at December 31, 2016
403,423
Granted
126,239
Vested
(157,816
)
Forfeited
—
Balance at September 30, 2017
371,846
23
Table of Contents
The unrecognized compensation expense associated with the Company’s LTIP units at
September 30, 2017
was approximately
$6.0 million
and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
2.6 years
.
The following table summarizes the fair value at vesting for the LTIP units vested during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
.
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2017
2016
2017
2016
Vested LTIP units
44,942
45,874
157,816
262,025
Fair value of vested LTIP units (in thousands)
$
1,235
$
1,124
$
4,146
$
5,306
Other Common Units
As partial consideration for a property acquired on
May 31, 2017
, the Company granted
687,827
Other Common Units with a fair value of approximately
$18.6 million
. The number of Other Common Units granted was calculated based on the trailing
five
-day average common stock closing price ending on the second business day that immediately preceded the grant date. The fair value of the Other Common Units granted was calculated based on the Company's closing stock price on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date multiplied by the number of Other Common Units granted. The issuance of the Other Common Units was effected in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. The Company relied on the exemption based on representations given by the holders of the Other Common Units. Subject to certain restrictions, the Other Common Units may be redeemed for cash or, at the Company’s election, common stock on a
one-for-one
basis, subject to adjustment, as provided in the operating partnership agreement.
8. Equity Incentive Plan
On January 6, 2017, the Company granted performance units approved by the compensation committee of the board of directors, under the 2011 Plan to provide certain key employees of the Company with incentives designed to align those key employees' interests more closely with those of the stockholders.
The ultimate value of the performance units depends on the Company’s total stockholder return ("TSR") over a
three
-year period commencing January 1, 2017 and ends on December 31, 2019 (the "measuring period"). At the end of the measuring period, the performance units convert into shares of common stock, or, at the Company's election and with the award recipient's consent, LTIP units or other securities, at a rate depending on the Company’s TSR over the measuring period as compared to
three
different benchmarks and on the absolute amount of the Company’s TSR. A recipient of the performance units may receive as few as
zero
shares or as many as
250%
of the number of target units, plus deemed dividends. The target amount of the performance units is nominally allocated as: i)
25%
to the Company’s TSR compared to the TSR of an industry peer group; ii)
25%
to the Company’s TSR compared to the TSR of a size-based peer group; and iii)
50%
to the Company’s TSR compared to the TSR of the companies in the MSCI US REIT index.
No dividends are paid to the recipient during the measuring period. At the end of the measuring period, if the Company’s TSR is such that the recipient earns shares of common stock or, at the Company's election and with the award recipient's consent, LTIP units or other securities (“Award Shares”), the recipient will receive additional Award Shares relating to dividends deemed to have been paid and reinvested on the Award Shares. The Company, in the discretion of the compensation committee of the board of directors, may pay the cash value of the deemed dividends instead of issuing additional Award Shares. The number of Award Shares is determined at the end of the measuring period, and one-half of the Award Shares and all dividend shares vest immediately. The other one-half of the Award Shares will be restricted (subject to forfeiture) and vest
one
year after the end of the measuring period.
The fair value of the performance units at the date of grant was determined by a lattice-binomial option-pricing model based on a Monte Carlo simulation. The fair value of the performance units are based on Level 3 inputs and are non-recurring fair value measurements. The table below sets forth the assumptions used in valuing the performance units granted during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
.
Performance Units
Assumptions
Grant date
January 6, 2017
Expected volatility
23.0
%
Expected dividend yield
6.0
%
Risk-free interest rate
1.61
%
Fair value of performance units grant (in thousands)
$
2,882
24
Table of Contents
The performance unit equity compensation expense is recognized into earnings ratably from the grant date over the respective vesting periods. The unrecognized compensation expense associated with the Company's performance units and outperformance program
(collectively, "Performance-based Compensation Plans")
at
September 30, 2017
was approximately
$3.7 million
and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
2.3 years
.
Non-cash Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes the amount recorded in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the amortization of restricted shares of common stock, LTIP units, Performance-based Compensation Plans, and the Company’s board of directors’ compensation for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
.
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
Non-Cash Compensation Expense (in thousands)
2017
2016
2017
2016
Restricted shares of common stock
$
594
$
533
$
1,776
$
1,625
LTIP units
1,167
1,099
3,508
4,992
(1)
Performance-based Compensation Plans
536
322
1,610
816
Board of directors compensation
(2)
87
89
265
259
Total non-cash compensation expense
$
2,384
$
2,043
$
7,159
$
7,692
(1)
Inclusive of approximately
$1.6 million
of non-cash compensation expense during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
associated with the severance cost of a former executive officer.
(2)
All of the Company’s independent directors elected to receive shares of common stock in lieu of cash for their service during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
. The number of shares of common stock granted is calculated based on the trailing
10 days
average common stock price ending on the third business day preceding the grant date.
9. Earnings Per Share
During the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, there were
237,207
,
238,129
,
272,337
and
277,720
, respectively, unvested shares of restricted stock on a weighted average basis that were considered participating securities.
The following tables set forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
.
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
Earnings Per Share (in thousands, except share data)
2017
2016
2017
2016
Numerator
Net income
$
21,839
$
130
$
23,276
$
2,521
Less: preferred stock dividends
2,449
4,001
7,345
10,914
Less: amount allocated to participating securities
84
95
250
289
Less: income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest after preferred stock dividends
828
(190
)
673
(424
)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders
$
18,478
$
(3,776
)
$
15,008
$
(8,258
)
Denominator
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic
92,786,852
71,130,848
87,632,167
68,984,670
Effect of dilutive securities
(1)
Unvested shares of restricted common stock
108,417
—
96,836
—
Unvested Performance-based Compensation Plans
539,705
—
509,137
—
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted
93,434,974
71,130,848
88,238,140
68,984,670
Net income (loss) per share — basic and diluted
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — basic
$
0.20
$
(0.05
)
$
0.17
$
(0.12
)
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders — diluted
$
0.20
$
(0.05
)
$
0.17
$
(0.12
)
(1)
During the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
, there were
272,337
and
277,720
, respectively, unvested shares of restricted common stock on a weighted average basis that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been antidilutive for the period. During the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
, there were
278,788
and
210,617
, respectively, unvested Performance-based Compensation Plans on a weighted average basis that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been antidilutive for the period.
25
Table of Contents
10. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. These matters are generally covered by insurance subject to deductible requirements. Management believes that the ultimate settlement of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
The Company was subject to a one-time incentive fee based on aggregate performance thresholds of the acquired buildings sourced by Columbus Nova Real Estate Acquisition Group, LLC. The measurement period for the incentive fee ended on May 31, 2017. The incentive fee was settled in cash of approximately
$0.7 million
during the three months ended September 30, 2017. Incentive fee (gain) loss of approximately
$(0.2) million
,
$0.7 million
,
$0
, and
$0
for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively, is included in other expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of
December 31, 2016
, the fair value of the incentive fee was
zero
. The estimated fair value as of December 31, 2016 was calculated using the discounted cash flow method under the income approach using the following Level 3 inputs: discount rates of
8.0%
to
12.0%
and exit capitalization rates of
7.0%
to
12.0%
.
The Company has letters of credit of approximately
$5.9 million
as of
September 30, 2017
related to development projects and certain other agreements.
11. Subsequent Events
There were no recognized or non-recognized subsequent events.
26
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion with the financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in Item 1 of this report and the audited financial statements and related notes thereto included in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
As used herein, except where the context otherwise requires, “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us,” refer to STAG Industrial, Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries and partnerships, including our operating partnership,
STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P. (“Operating Partnership”).
Revision of Previously Reported Consolidated Financial Statements
In connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, we identified an error in the estimated useful life of a building acquired in the fourth quarter of 2014. As a result of the error, depreciation expense had been overstated and thereby rental property, net and equity were understated. We concluded that the amounts were not material to any of our previously issued consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, we revised these balances in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. For more information on this revision, see Note 2 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, “Revision of Previously Reported Consolidated Financial Statements."
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). You can identify forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “seeks,” “should,” “will,” and variations of such words or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements in this report include, among others, statements about our future financial condition, results of operations, capitalization rates on future acquisitions, our business strategy and objectives, including our acquisition strategy, occupancy and leasing rates and trends, and expected liquidity needs and sources (including capital expenditures and the ability to obtain financing or raise capital). Our forward-looking statements reflect our current views about our plans, intentions, expectations, strategies and prospects, which are based on the information currently available to us and on assumptions we have made. Although we believe that our plans, intentions, expectations, strategies and prospects as reflected in or suggested by our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that our plans, intentions, expectations, strategies or prospects will be attained or achieved and you should not place undue reliance on these forward‑looking statements. Furthermore, actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward‑looking statements and may be affected by a variety of risks and factors including, without limitation:
•
the factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as updated elsewhere in this report, including those set forth under the headings “Business,” “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations;”
•
our ability to raise equity capital on attractive terms;
•
the competitive environment in which we operate;
•
real estate risks, including fluctuations in real estate values and the general economic climate in local markets and competition for tenants in such markets;
•
decreased rental rates or increased vacancy rates;
•
potential defaults (including bankruptcies or insolvency) on or non-renewal of leases by tenants;
•
acquisition risks, including our ability to identify and complete accretive acquisitions and/or failure of such acquisitions to perform in accordance with projections;
•
the timing of acquisitions and dispositions;
•
potential natural disasters and other potentially catastrophic events such as acts of war and/or terrorism;
27
Table of Contents
•
international, national, regional and local economic conditions;
•
the general level of interest rates and currencies;
•
potential changes in the law or governmental regulations and interpretations of those laws and regulations, including changes in real estate and zoning laws or real estate investment trust (“REIT”) or corporate income tax laws, and potential increases in real property tax rates;
•
financing risks, including the risks that our cash flows from operations may be insufficient to meet required payments of principal and interest and we may be unable to refinance our existing debt upon maturity or obtain new financing on attractive terms or at all;
•
credit risk in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the interest rate swaps and revolving and unfunded debt;
•
lack of or insufficient amounts of insurance;
•
our ability to maintain our qualification as a REIT;
•
our ability to retain key personnel;
•
litigation, including costs associated with prosecuting or defending claims and any adverse outcomes; and
•
possible environmental liabilities, including costs, fines or penalties that may be incurred due to necessary remediation of contamination of properties presently owned or previously owned by us.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made. New risks and uncertainties arise over time, and it is not possible for us to predict those events or how they may affect us. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to, and do not intend to, update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We are a REIT focused on the acquisition and operation of single-tenant, industrial properties throughout the United States. We (i) identify primarily single-tenant industrial properties that create relative value investments across all locations, lease terms, and tenants through the principled application of our proprietary risk assessment model, (ii) operate our properties in an efficient, cost-effective manner, and (iii) capitalize our business appropriately given the characteristics of our assets. We are a Maryland corporation and our common stock is publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “STAG.”
We are organized and conduct our operations to qualify as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and generally are not subject to federal income tax to the extent we currently distribute our income to our stockholders and maintain our qualification as a REIT. We remain subject to state and local taxes on our income and property and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.
Factors That May Influence Future Results of Operations
Our ability to increase revenues or cash flow will depend in part on our (i) external growth, specifically acquisition activity, and (ii) internal growth, specifically occupancy and rental rates on our portfolio. A variety of other factors, including those noted below, also affect our future results of operations.
As used herein “total annualized base rental revenue” refers to the contractual monthly base rent as of
September 30, 2017
(which differs from rent calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("GAAP")) multiplied by 12. If a tenant is in a free rent period as of
September 30, 2017
, the annualized rent is calculated based on the first contractual monthly base rent amount multiplied by 12.
28
Table of Contents
Outlook
The outlook for our business remains positive, albeit on a moderated basis in light of continued slow economic growth, some uncertainty regarding the new U.S. presidential administration and its policy initiatives, and continued asset appreciation. The federal funds target rate remained unchanged in the third quarter and the target rate remains very low, in a range of 1.00% to 1.25%. Most recently, the Central Bank announced it would start unwinding its balance sheet in October by selling Treasury securities and agency debt on a gradual, stepped increase monthly schedule. This announcement combined with a high likelihood of another rate increase in December are signs of the Central Bank’s confidence in the economy. The current trajectory of the federal funds target rate aligns with the Central Bank’s consistent commentary that future rate increases would be gradual and rates would likely remain historically low for an extended period of time. If interest rates were to rise further as a result of Federal Reserve policy action (short-term interest rates) or changes in market expectations and capital flows (long-term interest rates), we believe strengthening economic conditions are likely to accompany these changes. This strengthening of economic conditions combined with the currently favorable industrial supply demand environment should translate to a net positive result for our business. Specifically, our existing portfolio should benefit from rising rental rates and our acquisition activity should benefit from higher yields. Furthermore, we believe certain characteristics of our business should position us well in a rising interest rate environment, including the fact that we have minimal floating rate debt exposure (taking into account our hedging activities) and that many of our competitors for the assets we purchase tend to be smaller local investors who are likely to be more heavily impacted by interest rate increases.
The new U.S. presidential administration's first nine months have been active, however, the administration has faced difficulty implementing its initiatives. So far, there have been no significant legislative changes related to policy promises. The positive capital market movement since the election appears to indicate net favorable expectations in key areas, including corporate tax, healthcare, regulation, infrastructure, and trade. Other notable items with economic impact include the continued relative strength of the U.S. dollar versus competing currencies (including the euro and pound) and continued relatively low oil prices. The U.S. dollar weakened in the first nine months of 2017, but remains historically strong. A strong U.S. dollar can harm U.S. exporters and U.S. multi-nationals; however, it can also benefit foreign multi-nationals positively, which support U.S. subsidiaries and U.S. industrial properties. Oil price declines over the past several years and the lack of a sustained rebound in price have put significant pressure on oil and gas exploration and production companies, resulting in many oil and gas sector bankruptcies, while simultaneously benefiting many industries (e.g. automotive, freight) and consumers’ disposable incomes. In June 2016, the passing of the U.K.’s referendum to separate itself from the European Union, known as Brexit, was a major surprise to the markets. The U.K.'s formal withdrawal process commenced in March 2017. The country’s progress in renegotiating financial and economic relationships with the European Union and the resulting outcomes will take many years to unfold. We believe our direct exposure to the U.K. market is limited. Of our tenants that do have direct exposure to the U.K., we believe they are well-diversified businesses. We will continue to monitor these trends for short-term and long-term impacts to our business.
Several economic indicators and other factors provide insight into the U.S. economic environment and industrial demand. Presently, we believe the key factors include gross domestic product ("GDP") growth rate, unemployment rate, non-farm payrolls, Conference Board consumer confidence index, manufacturing-purchasing manager index (“ISM”), the 10-year Treasury yield, U.S. total vehicle sales, and durable goods new orders. Below are recent trends in each of these factors.
Economic Indicators
(1)
September 30, 2017
June 30, 2017
March 31, 2017
December 31, 2016
September 30, 2016
GDP Growth Rate
3.0%
3.1%
1.2%
1.8%
2.8%
Unemployment Rate
4.2%
4.4%
4.5%
4.7%
4.9%
Change in Non-Farm Employment (in thousands)
(33)
210
50
155
249
Consumer Confidence Index
119.8
118.9
125.6
113.3
104.1
ISM
(2)
60.8%
57.8%
57.2%
54.5%
51.7%
10-year Treasury Yield
2.33%
2.31%
2.40%
2.45%
1.60%
Seasonally Adjusted Annualized Rate US Total Vehicle Sales (in thousands)
18,469
16,608
16,719
18,051
17,650
Manufacturing New Orders: Durable Goods (in millions)
238,695
245,705
232,817
223,681
220,333
(1)
Sources: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Conference Board, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, U.S. Census Bureau, and Institute for Supply Management. Each statistic is the latest revision available at the time of publishing this report.
(2)
ISM is a composite index based on a survey of over 300 purchasing and supply executives from across the country who respond to a monthly questionnaire about changes in production, new orders, new export orders, imports, employment, inventories, prices, lead-times, and timelines of supplier deliveries in their companies. When the index is over 50, it indicates expansion, while a reading below 50 signals contraction.
Currently, the GDP growth rate, average growth of non-farm employment, level of U.S. total vehicle sales, ISM level, consumer confidence, and low interest rates are positive fundamental signs for industrial demand. At the end of September, the ISM level grew to its highest level since May 2004 and consumer confidence remained strong, which coincides with the average consumer
29
Table of Contents
FICO score reaching an all-time high. These factors, combined with an expanding job count and ongoing low unemployment rate suggests consumers will be spending more money on goods in the foreseeable future. The strong U.S. dollar means that U.S. consumers may be purchasing a relatively larger amount of imported goods and that U.S. companies are likely to lower their rate of exports. This is likely to be a net positive for industrial real estate demand as imports tend to lead to greater net absorption than do exports.
From a corporate credit perspective, we expect U.S. default rates to be stable to declining for the remainder of the year behind positive economic growth. We believe improving commodity markets and capital markets stability will be important in supporting this outlook. Standard & Poor’s trailing 12-month September 2017 U.S. speculative grade corporate default rate declined to 3.1% compared to 3.8% at June 2017. We continue to watch the energy sector as well as closely monitor both the retail sector due to stress around apparel and department stores, and the automotive industry, given light vehicle sales are projected to decline for full year 2017 and 2018. We also note that many large multinational companies are experiencing weak organic growth, primarily due to slow economic growth, negative currency effects and commodity price deflation. We believe the combination of these observations signals some caution in underlying economic strength, however, we still expect an increase in industrial activity and demand for industrial space in the foreseeable future given expected job growth, low-interest rate environment, and GDP growth.
Several industrial specific trends contribute to the expected demand increase, including:
•
an increasing attractiveness of the U.S. as a manufacturing and distribution location because of the size of the U.S. consumer market, an increase in overseas labor costs and the overall cost of supplying and shipping goods (i.e. the shortening and fattening of the supply chain);
•
the overall quality of the transportation infrastructure in the U.S.; and
•
the rise of e-commerce (as compared to the traditional retail store distribution model) and the concomitant demand by e-commerce industry participants for well-located, functional distribution space.
Furthermore, the lack of material speculative development and the broader failure of supply to keep pace with demand in many of our markets has improved and may modestly further improve occupancy levels and rental rates in our portfolio. We believe, however, that industrial supply, more so than other real estate property types, has historically had a short lead time and can appear quickly. We have started to see a notable pick-up in development activity in a growing number of the more active industrial markets, and we believe this may be beginning to take a firmer hold on a broader scale. We will continue to monitor the supply and demand fundamentals for industrial real estate and assess its impact on our business.
Conditions in Our Markets
The buildings in our portfolio are located in markets throughout the United States. Positive or negative changes in economic or other conditions, new supply, adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, and other factors in these markets may affect our overall performance.
Rental Income
We receive income primarily in the form of rental income from the tenants who occupy our buildings. The amount of rental income generated by the buildings in our portfolio depends principally on occupancy and rental rates. As of
September 30, 2017
, our Operating Portfolio (as defined below) was approximately
95.4%
leased and our lease rates as defined by GAAP on new and renewal leases together grew approximately
18.7%
and
10.5%
during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
.
We define the Operating Portfolio as including all warehouse and light manufacturing assets and excluding non-core flex/office assets and assets under redevelopment. The Operating Portfolio also excludes billboard, parking lot and cellular tower leases.
Future economic downturns or regional downturns affecting our submarkets that impair our ability to renew or re-lease space and the ability of our tenants to fulfill their lease commitments, as in the case of tenant bankruptcies, could adversely affect our ability to maintain or increase rental rates at our buildings. Our ability to lease our properties and the attendant rental rate is dependent upon, among other things, (i) the overall economy, (ii) the supply/demand dynamic in our markets, (iii) the quality of our properties, including age, clear height, and configuration, and (iv) our tenants’ ability to meet their contractual obligations to us.
30
Table of Contents
The following table provides a summary of our Operating Portfolio leases executed during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
. Certain leases contain rental concessions; any such rental concessions are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Operating Portfolio
Square Feet
Cash
Basis Rent Per
Square Foot
GAAP Basis Rent Per
Square Foot
Total Turnover Costs Per
Square
Foot
(1)
Cash
Rent Change
(2)
GAAP Rent Change
(3)
Weighted Average Lease
Term
(4)
(years)
Rental Concessions per Square Foot
(5)
Three months ended September 30, 2017
New Leases
(6)
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
—
%
—
%
—
$
—
Renewal Leases
(7)
2,000,753
3.97
4.11
0.62
10.5
%
18.7
%
4.7
0.06
Total/weighted average
2,000,753
$
3.97
$
4.11
$
0.62
10.5
%
18.7
%
4.7
$
0.06
Nine months ended September 30, 2017
New Leases
(6)
1,289,221
$
4.19
$
4.35
$
1.78
4.3
%
8.6
%
4.3
$
0.12
Renewal Leases
(7)
7,542,279
3.85
4.00
0.64
2.8
%
10.8
%
5.4
0.33
Total/weighted average
8,831,500
$
3.90
$
4.05
$
0.80
3.0
%
10.5
%
5.2
$
0.30
(1)
We define Turnover Costs as the costs for improvements of vacant and renewal spaces, as well as the commissions for leasing transactions. Turnover Costs per square foot represent the total turnover costs expected to be incurred on the leases signed during the period and do not reflect actual expenditures for the period.
(2)
We define Cash Basis Rent Change as the percentage change in base rent (excluding straight-line rent adjustments and above/below market lease amortization as required by GAAP) of the Comparable Lease.
We define a Comparable Lease as a lease with a similar lease structure as compared to the previous in-place lease, excluding new leases for space that was not occupied under our ownership, leases on space with downtime in excess of two years, leases with materially different lease structures,
leases associated with known vacates at the time of acquisition, and leases with credit-related modifications
.
(3)
We define GAAP Rent Change as the percentage change in the average base rent over the contractual lease term (excluding above/below market lease amortization) of the Comparable Lease.
(4)
We define Weighted Average Lease Term as the contractual lease term in years as of the lease start date weighted by square footage.
(5)
Represents the total concessions for the entire lease term.
(6)
We define a New Lease as any lease that is signed for an initial term equal to or greater than twelve months for any vacant space; this includes a new tenant or an existing tenant that is expanding into new (additional) space.
(7)
We define a Renewal Lease as a lease signed by an existing tenant to extend the term for twelve months or more, including (i) a renewal of the same space as the current lease at lease expiration, (ii) a renewal of only a portion of the current space at lease expiration and (iii) an early renewal or workout, which ultimately does extend the original term for twelve months or more.
Property Operating Expenses
Our property operating expenses generally consist of utilities, real estate taxes, management fees, insurance, and site repair and maintenance costs. For the majority of our tenants, our property operating expenses are controlled, in part, by the triple net provisions in tenant leases. In our triple net leases, the tenant is responsible for all aspects of and costs related to the building and its operation during the lease term, including utilities, taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. However, we also have modified gross leases and gross leases in our building portfolio. The terms of those leases vary and on some occasions we may absorb certain building related expenses of our tenants. In our modified gross leases, we are responsible for some building related expenses during the lease term, but the cost of most of the expenses is passed through to the tenant for reimbursement to us. In our gross leases, we are responsible for all costs related to the building and its operation during the lease term. Our overall performance will be affected by the extent to which we are able to pass-through property operating expenses to our tenants.
Scheduled Lease Expirations
Our ability to re-lease space subject to expiring leases will impact our results of operations and is affected by economic and competitive conditions in our markets and by the desirability of our individual buildings. Leases that comprise approximately
8.4%
of our annualized base rental revenue will expire during the period from
October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018
, excluding month to month leases. We assume, based upon internal renewal probability estimates that some of our tenants will renew and others will vacate and the associated space will be re-let subject to downtime assumptions. Using the aforementioned assumptions, we expect that the rental rates on the respective new leases will generally be lower than the rates under existing leases expiring during the period
October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018
, thereby resulting in lower revenue from the same space.
31
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth a summary of lease expirations for leases in place as of
September 30, 2017
, plus available space, for each of the ten calendar years beginning with 2017 and thereafter in our portfolio. The information in the table assumes that tenants exercise no renewal options and no early termination rights.
Lease Expiration Year
Number
of
Leases
Expiring
Total Rentable
Square Feet
% of
Total
Occupied
Square Feet
Total Annualized
Base Rental
Revenue
(in thousands)
% of Total
Annualized
Base Rental Revenue
Available
—
3,742,275
—
—
—
Month-to-month leases
6
181,195
0.3
%
$
619
0.2
%
Remainder of 2017
6
889,311
1.4
%
4,083
1.5
%
2018
47
7,290,214
11.1
%
28,783
10.8
%
2019
54
9,536,734
14.6
%
38,202
14.3
%
2020
45
9,441,158
14.4
%
40,035
15.0
%
2021
54
9,043,845
13.8
%
38,846
14.5
%
2022
46
5,694,530
8.7
%
24,461
9.2
%
2023
26
5,988,440
9.2
%
20,925
7.8
%
2024
16
3,420,484
5.2
%
13,075
4.9
%
2025
13
2,334,842
3.6
%
9,733
3.6
%
2026
20
4,454,070
6.8
%
16,751
6.3
%
Thereafter
32
7,131,054
10.9
%
31,537
11.9
%
Total/weighted average
365
69,148,152
100.0
%
$
267,050
100.0
%
As of
September 30, 2017
, for the period
October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018
, none of our top ten leases based on
September 30, 2017
annualized base rental revenue will be expiring.
Portfolio Summary
The following table sets forth information relating to diversification by building type in our portfolio as of
September 30, 2017
.
Square Footage
Annualized Base Rental Revenue
Building Type
Number of Buildings
Amount
%
Occupancy Rate
(1)
Amount
(in thousands)
%
Warehouse/Distribution
279
62,010,039
89.8
%
95.2
%
$
235,980
88.4
%
Light Manufacturing
53
5,907,437
8.5
%
97.2
%
23,775
8.9
%
Total Operating Portfolio
332
67,917,476
98.3
%
95.4
%
$
259,755
97.3
%
Redevelopment
1
307,315
0.4
%
—
%
—
—
%
Flex/Office
14
923,361
1.3
%
70.0
%
7,295
2.7
%
Total portfolio/weighted average
347
69,148,152
100.0
%
94.6
%
$
267,050
100.0
%
(1)
We define Occupancy Rate as the percentage of total leasable square footage for which the lease term has commenced as of the close of the reporting period.
32
Table of Contents
Portfolio Acquisitions
The following table summarizes our acquisitions during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
.
Location of Property
Square Feet
Buildings
Purchase Price
(in thousands)
Jacksonville, FL
1,025,720
4
$
34,264
Sparks, NV
174,763
1
8,380
Salisbury, NC
288,000
1
8,250
Franklin Township, NJ
183,000
1
12,800
Milford, CT
200,000
1
12,762
Bedford Heights, OH
173,034
1
7,622
Redford, MI
135,728
1
7,769
Warren, MI
154,377
1
7,940
Three months ended March 31, 2017
2,334,622
11
99,787
Waukegan, IL
261,075
2
13,850
Gaffney, SC
226,968
1
7,200
Dayton, OH
569,966
1
29,750
Belvidere, IL
336,204
1
22,867
San Diego, CA
205,440
1
19,362
Edwardsville, KS
270,869
1
16,270
Pedricktown, NJ
245,749
1
16,000
Walton, KY
224,921
1
11,450
Rock Hill, SC
275,000
1
6,675
Laredo, TX
206,810
1
13,500
Clinton, PA
297,200
1
23,650
Batavia, IL
102,500
1
5,900
Wallingford, CT
105,000
1
8,200
Rockwall, TX
389,546
1
28,600
Houston, TX
232,800
3
25,000
Lebanon, PA
211,358
1
7,950
Maple Grove, MN
108,628
1
10,031
Romulus, MI
303,760
1
19,351
Three months ended June 30, 2017
4,573,794
21
285,606
Stone Mountain, GA
78,000
1
4,175
York, PA
382,886
1
18,981
Pittston, PA
437,446
1
23,950
O'Fallon, MO
109,854
1
5,740
Belleville, MI
160,464
1
8,641
Columbus, OH
147,645
1
6,954
Groveport, OH
320,657
1
13,643
Las Vegas, NV
34,916
1
4,642
Mooresville, NC
499,200
1
25,750
Swedesboro, NJ
123,962
1
7,250
Three months ended September 30, 2017
2,295,030
10
119,726
Nine months ended September 30, 2017
9,203,446
42
$
505,119
Portfolio Dispositions
During the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
, we sold
nine
buildings comprised of approximately
1.0 million
square feet with a net book value of approximately
$24.3 million
to third parties. These buildings contributed approximately
$0.1 million
,
$1.3 million
,
$0.9 million
and
$3.0 million
to revenue for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively. These buildings contributed approximately
$(0.1) million
,
$0.1 million
,
$0.1 million
and
$0.4 million
to
net income (loss) (exclusive of loss on impairment and gain on the sales of rental property, net)
for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively. Net proceeds from the sales of rental property were approximately
$43.5 million
and we recognized a gain on the sales of rental property, net of approximately
$19.2 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
. These dispositions were accounted for under the full accrual method.
33
Table of Contents
Geographic Diversification
The following table sets forth information about the ten largest markets in our portfolio based on total annualized base rental revenue as of
September 30, 2017
.
Market
(1)
% of Total Annualized Base Rental Revenue
Philadelphia, PA
10.4
%
Chicago, IL
8.8
%
Greenville/Spartanburg, SC
4.4
%
Charlotte, NC
4.2
%
Cincinnati/Dayton, OH
3.6
%
Milwaukee/Mad
ison, WI
3.4
%
Detroit, MI
3.2
%
West Michigan, MI
2.8
%
Westchester/So Connecticut, CT/NY
2.4
%
Cleveland, OH
2.2
%
Total
45.4
%
(1) As defined by CoStar Realty Information Inc.
Buildings by Market
While we invest in properties in all locations, our proprietary risk assessment model typically identifies the best relative value in primary and secondary markets. As of
September 30, 2017
, our Operating Portfolio investments in primary, secondary, and tertiary markets are summarized in the table below.
Square Footage
Annualized Base Rental Revenue
Operating Portfolio Market Type
Number of
Buildings
Amount
%
Occupancy
Amount
(in thousands)
%
Primary (greater than 200 million net rentable square feet)
88
18,506,854
27.2
%
93.7
%
$
75,365
29.0
%
Secondary (25 million to 200 million net rentable square feet)
199
42,401,355
62.5
%
96.7
%
160,752
61.9
%
Tertiary (less than 25 million net rentable square feet)
45
7,009,267
10.3
%
91.8
%
23,638
9.1
%
Total/weighted average
332
67,917,476
100.0
%
95.4
%
$
259,755
100.0
%
Industry Diversification
The following table sets forth information about the ten largest tenant industries in our portfolio based on total annualized base rental revenue as of
September 30, 2017
.
Top Ten Tenant Industries
% of Total
Annualized Base Rental Revenue
Automotive
13.9
%
Air Freight & Logistics
12.1
%
Ind Equip, Component & Metals
10.7
%
Containers & Packaging
10.0
%
Food & Beverages
9.7
%
Retail
6.2
%
Business Services
5.3
%
Personal Products
5.2
%
Household Durables
5.0
%
Building Materials
3.8
%
Total
81.9
%
34
Table of Contents
Top Tenants
The following table sets forth information about the ten largest tenants in our portfolio based on total annualized base rental revenue as of
September 30, 2017
.
Top Ten Tenants
Number of Leases
% of Total
Annualized Base
Rental Revenue
General Services Administratio
n
1
2.6
%
XPO Logistics
4
2.0
%
Deckers Outdoor
2
1.6
%
TriMas Corporation
4
1.5
%
Solo Cup
1
1.4
%
DHL
4
1.1
%
FedEx
3
1.0
%
Generation Brands
1
1.0
%
Carolina Beverage Group
2
1.0
%
Perrigo
2
0.9
%
Total
24
14.1
%
Top Leases
The following table sets forth information about the ten largest leases in our portfolio based on total annualized base rental revenue as of
September 30, 2017
.
Top Ten Leases
% of Total
Annualized Base
Rental Revenue
General Services Administratio
n
2.6
%
Solo Cup
1.4
%
XPO Logistics
1.1
%
Generation Brands
1.0
%
Deckers Outdoor
0.9
%
Spencer Gifts, LLC
0.9
%
Closetmaid Corporation
0.8
%
Jo-Ann Stores, LLC
0.7
%
STP Products Manufacturing Com
pany
0.7
%
Mars Chocolate North America
0.7
%
Total
10.8
%
Tenant Retention
Our direct relationships with our tenants and our in-house expertise in leasing, asset management, engineering, and credit underwriting help us to manage all operational aspects of our portfolio, maintain occupancy, and increase rental rates. The following table provides a summary of our Operating Portfolio tenant retention during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
.
Quarter ended 2017
Retention %
(1)
Weighted Average Lease Term (years)
Expiring Square Feet
Renewal Square Feet
(2)
Cash Rent Change
GAAP Rent Change
September 30
70.9
%
4.0
1,263,911
896,695
8.5
%
15.3
%
June 30
60.2
%
6.0
1,804,836
1,085,796
(1.3
)%
2.2
%
March 31
51.3
%
3.4
1,185,453
607,608
13.4
%
23.6
%
Total/weighted average
60.9
%
4.7
4,254,200
2,590,099
5.9
%
12.1
%
(1)
We define Retention as the percentage determined by taking Renewal Lease square footage commencing in the period divided by square footage of leases expiring in the period. Neither the Renewal Leases nor leases expiring include Temporary Leases or License Agreements. Retention excludes leases associated with known vacates at the time of acquisition, leases with credit-related modifications, and early terminations.
We define a Temporary Lease or a License Agreement as any lease that is signed for an initial term of less than twelve months; this includes short-term new leases and short-term Renewal Leases.
(2)
We define Renewal Square Feet as the square footage of renewal leases commencing during the period, irrespective of the date signed.
35
Table of Contents
Critical Accounting Policies
See "Critical Accounting Policies" in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, for a discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates.
Goodwill
In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-04,
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
. The new standard removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. This standard is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt this standard effective January 1, 2017. The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Results of Operations
Our results of operations are largely driven by our levels of occupancy as well as the rental rates we receive from tenants. From a rental rate standpoint, we have historically achieved overall rental increases in our tenant rollovers on a cash basis and GAAP basis.
The following discussion of our results of our same store (as defined below) net operating income (“NOI”) should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements. For a detailed discussion of NOI, including the reasons management believes NOI is useful to investors, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below. Same store results are considered to be useful to investors in evaluating our performance because they provide information relating to changes in building-level operating performance without taking into account the effects of acquisitions or dispositions. However, because we have generally acquired 100% occupied properties and grown the portfolio significantly every year since our initial public offering, our same store results do not represent a market portfolio with market occupancy. Because we have above market occupancy, our same store results may look unfavorable at times as we trend to market levels. We encourage the reader to not only look at our same store results, but also our total portfolio results, due to historic and future growth.
Comparison of the three months ended
September 30, 2017
to the three months ended
September 30, 2016
Our same store portfolio excludes flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, buildings classified as held for sale on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, and buildings acquired and disposed of or placed in service after
July 1, 2016
. On
September 30, 2017
, we owned
249
industrial buildings consisting of approximately
49.9 million
square feet, which represents approximately
72.2%
of our total portfolio, that are considered our same store portfolio in the analysis below. Same store occupancy decreased approximately
0.7%
to
95.5%
as of
September 30, 2017
compared to
96.2%
as of
September 30, 2016
.
The following table summarizes selected operating information for our same store portfolio and our total portfolio for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
(dollars in thousands). This table includes a reconciliation from our same store portfolio to our total portfolio by also providing information for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
with respect to the buildings acquired and disposed of or placed into service after
July 1, 2016
and our flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, and buildings classified as held for sale.
36
Table of Contents
Same Store Portfolio
Acquisitions/Dispositions
Other
(1)
Total Portfolio
Three months ended September 30,
Change
Three months ended September 30,
Three months ended September 30,
Three months ended September 30,
Change
2017
2016
$
%
2017
2016
2017
2016
2017
2016
$
%
Revenue
Operating revenue
Rental income
$
47,212
$
46,897
$
315
0.7
%
$
15,675
$
4,326
$
2,786
$
2,288
$
65,673
$
53,511
$
12,162
22.7
%
Tenant recoveries
9,009
7,461
1,548
20.7
%
2,674
769
683
681
12,366
8,911
3,455
38.8
%
Other income
31
47
(16
)
(34.0
)%
63
28
11
98
105
173
(68
)
(39.3
)%
Total operating revenue
56,252
54,405
1,847
3.4
%
18,412
5,123
3,480
3,067
78,144
62,595
15,549
24.8
%
Expenses
Property
10,962
9,098
1,864
20.5
%
3,312
915
1,127
1,245
15,401
11,258
4,143
36.8
%
Net operating income
(2)
$
45,290
$
45,307
$
(17
)
—
%
$
15,100
$
4,208
$
2,353
$
1,822
62,743
51,337
11,406
22.2
%
Other expenses
General and administrative
8,380
7,603
777
10.2
%
Property acquisition costs
1,386
1,978
(592
)
(29.9
)%
Depreciation and amortization
38,186
31,489
6,697
21.3
%
Other expenses
58
279
(221
)
(79.2
)%
Total other expenses
48,010
41,349
6,661
16.1
%
Total expenses
63,411
52,607
10,804
20.5
%
Other income (expense)
Interest income
2
3
(1
)
(33.3
)%
Interest expense
(10,446
)
(10,504
)
58
(0.6
)%
Loss on extinguishment of debt
(13
)
—
(13
)
100.0
%
Gain on the sales of rental property, net
17,563
643
16,920
2,631.4
%
Total other income (expense)
7,106
(9,858
)
16,964
172.1
%
Net income
$
21,839
$
130
$
21,709
16,699.2
%
(1)
Includes flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, buildings classified as held for sale, and buildings placed in service after
July 1, 2016
, which are excluded from the same store portfolio. Also includes asset management fee income, which are separated for purposes of calculating NOI.
(2)
Excluding asset management fee income, NOI for the total portfolio for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
was
$62.7 million
and
$51.3 million
, respectively. Asset management fee income is included in other income in the table above. For a detailed discussion of NOI, including the reasons management believes NOI is useful to investors, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
37
Table of Contents
Net Income
Net income
for our total portfolio
increased
by
$21.7 million
or
16,699.2%
to
$21.8 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
, compared to
$0.1 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2016
.
Same Store Total Operating Revenue
Same store total operating revenue consists primarily of (i) rental income consisting of base rent, termination income, straight-line rent and above and below market lease amortization from our properties, and (ii) tenant reimbursements for insurance, real estate taxes and certain other expenses (“tenant recoveries”).
For a detailed reconciliation of our same store total operating revenue to
net income
, see the table above.
Same store rental income
increased
by
$0.3 million
or
0.7%
to
$47.2 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to
$46.9 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2016
. Approximately $1.3 million of the increase was attributable to rental increases due to new leases and renewals of existing tenants. Same store rental income also increased approximately $0.1 million due to a net decrease in the amortization of net above market leases and approximately $0.4 million due to the recognition of straight-line income from termination fees at certain buildings, including our Buena Vista, VA and Golden, CO buildings, as discussed in Note 2 of the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These increases were partially offset by an approximately $1.5 million decrease due to a reduction of base rent due to tenants downsizing their spaces and vacancies.
Same store tenant recoveries
increased
by
$1.5 million
or
20.7%
to
$9.0 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to
$7.5 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2016
. Approximately $1.0 million of the increase was primarily due to increases in occupancy and real estate taxes levied by the taxing authority, as well as changes to lease terms where we began paying the real estate taxes and operating expenses on behalf of tenants that had previously paid its taxes and operating expenses directly to respective vendors. The increase was also attributable to one of our properties where it was determined that the tenant will not be able to meet its requirements set forth by the taxing authority to be entitled to an abatement of real estate taxes. The abatement was applicable to prior periods, and as such the expense and related recovery recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2017 includes 36 months of real estate taxes, which attributed to approximately $0.6 million of the increase in same store tenant recoveries. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of approximately $0.1 million related to vacancy of previously occupied buildings and decreases in real estate taxes levied by the taxing authority.
Same Store Operating Expenses
Same store operating expenses consist primarily of property operating expenses and real estate taxes and insurance.
For a detailed reconciliation of our same store operating expenses to
net income
, see the table above.
Total same store operating expenses
increased
by
$1.9 million
or
20.5%
to
$11.0 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to
$9.1 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2016
. This increase was primarily related to increases in real estate taxes levied by the related taxing authority of approximately $1.0 million, as well as an increase of approximately $0.3 million in general repairs and maintenance and utilities expenses. The remaining increase was attributable to one of our properties where it was determined that the tenant will not be able to meet its requirements set forth by the taxing authority to be entitled to an abatement of real estate taxes. The abatement was applicable to prior periods, and as such the expense and related recovery recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2017 includes 36 months of real estate taxes, which attributed to approximately $0.6 million of the increase in same store operating expenses.
38
Table of Contents
Acquisitions
and Dispositions
Net Operating Income
For a detailed reconciliation of our acquisitions and dispositions net operating income to
net income
, see the table above.
Subsequent to
July 1, 2016
, we acquired
79
buildings consisting of approximately
17.4 million
square feet, and sold
22
buildings consisting of approximately
3.4 million
square feet. For the three months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, the buildings acquired after
July 1, 2016
contributed approximately
$15.2 million
and
$1.3 million
to NOI, respectively. For the three months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, the buildings sold after
July 1, 2016
contributed approximately
$(0.1) million
and
$2.9 million
to net operating income (loss), respectively. Refer to Note 3 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding buildings acquired or sold.
Other Net Operating Income
Our other assets include our flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, buildings classified as held for sale, and buildings placed in service after
July 1, 2016
. It also includes asset management fee income, which is separated for purposes of calculating NOI for the total portfolio.
For a detailed reconciliation of our other net operating income to
net income
, see the table above.
At
September 30, 2017
, we owned
14
flex/office buildings consisting of approximately
0.9 million
square feet, one building consisting of approximately 0.1 million square feet that was classified as held for sale,
one
redevelopment building consisting of approximately
0.3 million
square feet, and three buildings consisting of approximately 0.5 million square feet that were placed into service after
July 1, 2016
. These buildings contributed approximately $2.4 million and $1.7 million to NOI for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively. Additionally, we earned approximately
$9,000
and
$0.1 million
in asset management fee income for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively.
Total Other Expenses
Total other expenses consist of general and administrative expense, property acquisition costs, depreciation and amortization, and other expenses.
Total other expenses
increased
$6.7 million
or
16.1%
for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
to
$48.0 million
compared to
$41.3 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2016
. This is primarily a result of an increase in depreciation and amortization of approximately
$6.7 million
as a result of buildings acquired which increased the depreciable asset base, as well as an increase of approximately
$0.8 million
primarily due to an increase in non-cash compensation expense related to the 2017 equity grants for employees and independent directors and other general and administrative expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in property acquisition costs of approximately
$0.6 million
due to decreased acquisition volume during the three months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2016
. Other expenses also decreased approximately
$0.2 million
which is primarily attributable to a gain on incentive fee due to the finalization of a one-time incentive fee payable to Columbus Nova Real Estate Acquisition Group, LLC as discussed in Note 10 of the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Total Other Income (Expense)
Total other income (expense) consists of interest income, interest expense, loss on extinguishment of debt, and gain on the sales of rental property. Interest expense includes interest incurred during the period as well as adjustments related to amortization of financing fees and debt issuance costs, amortization of fair market value adjustments associated with the assumption of debt, and gains or losses on hedge ineffectiveness.
Total other income (expense) increased
$17.0 million
or
172.1%
to a net other income position of
$7.1 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to a net other expense of
$9.9 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2016
. This increase is primarily the result of an increase in the gain on the sales of rental property of approximately
$16.9 million
. Additionally there was a decrease in interest expense of approximately
$0.1 million
which was primarily related to a gain on hedge ineffectiveness of approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2017
, whereas there was no hedge ineffectiveness for the three months ended
September 30, 2016
.
39
Table of Contents
Comparison of the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
Our same store portfolio excludes flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, buildings classified as held for sale on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, and buildings acquired and disposed of or placed in service after
January 1, 2016
. On
September 30, 2017
, we owned
242
industrial buildings consisting of approximately
48.2 million
square feet, which represents approximately
69.7%
of our total portfolio, that are considered our same store portfolio in the analysis below. Same store occupancy decreased approximately
0.7%
to
95.3%
as of
September 30, 2017
compared to
96.0%
as of
September 30, 2016
.
The following table summarizes selected operating information for our same store portfolio and our total portfolio for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
(dollars in thousands). This table includes a reconciliation from our same store portfolio to our total portfolio by also providing information for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
with respect to the buildings acquired and disposed of or placed into service after
January 1, 2016
and our flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, and buildings classified as held for sale.
40
Table of Contents
Same Store Portfolio
Acquisitions/Dispositions
Other
(1)
Total Portfolio
Nine months ended September 30,
Change
Nine months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
Change
2017
2016
$
%
2017
2016
2017
2016
2017
2016
$
%
Revenue
Operating revenue
Rental income
$
136,577
$
135,269
$
1,308
1.0
%
$
43,430
$
14,736
$
6,614
$
6,570
$
186,621
$
156,575
$
30,046
19.2
%
Tenant recoveries
24,224
21,920
2,304
10.5
%
6,935
2,785
1,793
2,102
32,952
26,807
6,145
22.9
%
Other income
93
89
4
4.5
%
96
61
55
177
244
$
327
(83
)
(25.4
)%
Total operating revenue
160,894
157,278
3,616
2.3
%
50,461
17,582
8,462
8,849
219,817
183,709
36,108
19.7
%
Expenses
Property
30,574
27,785
2,789
10.0
%
8,201
4,020
3,537
3,867
42,312
35,672
6,640
18.6
%
Net operating income
(2)
$
130,320
$
129,493
$
827
0.6
%
$
42,260
$
13,562
$
4,925
$
4,982
$
177,505
$
148,037
$
29,468
19.9
%
Other expenses
General and administrative
25,090
26,373
(1,283
)
(4.9
)%
Property acquisition costs
4,684
3,113
1,571
50.5
%
Depreciation and amortization
110,286
91,725
18,561
20.2
%
Loss on impairments
—
11,231
(11,231
)
(100.0
)%
Loss on involuntary conversion
330
—
330
100.0
%
Other expenses
1,502
857
645
75.3
%
Total other expenses
141,892
133,299
8,593
6.4
%
Total expenses
184,204
168,971
15,233
9.0
%
Other income (expense)
Interest income
10
8
2
25.0
%
Interest expense
(31,557
)
(31,841
)
284
(0.9
)%
Loss on extinguishment of debt
(15
)
(1,973
)
1,958
(99.2
)%
Gain on the sales of rental property, net
19,225
21,589
(2,364
)
(11.0
)%
Total other income (expense)
$
(12,337
)
$
(12,217
)
$
(120
)
1.0
%
Net income
$
23,276
$
2,521
$
20,755
823.3
%
(1)
Includes flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, buildings classified as held for sale, and buildings placed in service after January 1, 2016, which are excluded from the same store portfolio. Also includes asset management fee income, which are separated for purposes of calculating NOI.
(2)
Excluding asset management fee income, NOI for the total portfolio for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
was
$177.5 million
and
$147.9 million
, respectively. Asset management fee income is included in other income in the table above. For a detailed discussion of NOI, including the reasons management believes NOI is useful to investors, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
41
Table of Contents
Net Income
Net income
for our total portfolio increased by
$20.8 million
or
823.3%
to
$23.3 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to
$2.5 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
.
Same Store Total Operating Revenue
Same store operating revenue consists primarily of (i) rental income consisting of base rent, termination income, straight-line rent and above and below market lease amortization from our properties, and (ii) tenant reimbursements for insurance, real estate taxes and certain other expenses (“tenant recoveries”).
For a detailed reconciliation of our same store total operating revenue to net income, see the table above.
Same store rental income
increased
by
$1.3 million
or
1.0%
to
$136.6 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to
$135.3 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
. Approximately $3.6 million of the increase was attributable to rental increases due to new leases and renewals of existing tenants. Same store rental income also increased approximately $0.4 million due to a net decrease in the amortization of net above market leases and approximately $1.1 million due to the recognition of straight-line income from termination fees at certain buildings, including our Buena Vista, VA, Belvidere, IL, and Golden, CO buildings, as discussed in Note 2 of the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These increases were partially offset by an approximately $3.8 million decrease due to a reduction of base rent due to tenants downsizing their spaces and vacancies.
Same store tenant recoveries
increased
by
$2.3 million
or
10.5%
to
$24.2 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to
$21.9 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
. Approximately $2.5 million of the increase was primarily due to increases in occupancy and real estate taxes levied by the taxing authority, as well as changes to lease terms where we began paying the real estate taxes and operating expenses on behalf of tenants that had previously paid its taxes and operating expenses directly to respective vendors. The increase was also attributable to one of our properties where it was determined that the tenant will not be able to meet its requirements set forth by the taxing authority to be entitled to an abatement of real estate taxes. The abatement was applicable to prior periods, and as such the expense and related recovery recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 includes 36 months of real estate taxes, which attributed to approximately $0.6 million of the increase in same store tenant recoveries. This increase was partially offset by a decrease of approximately $0.8 million related to vacancy of previously occupied buildings.
Same Store Operating Expenses
Same store operating expenses consist primarily of property operating expenses and real estate taxes and insurance.
For a detailed reconciliation of our same store portfolio operating expenses to net income, see the table above.
Total same store expenses
increased
by
$2.8 million
or
10.0%
to
$30.6 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to
$27.8 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
. This increase was primarily related to increases in real estate taxes levied by the related taxing authority of approximately $1.8 million, as well as an increase of approximately $0.5 million in general repairs and maintenance and utilities expenses. The remaining increase was attributable to one of our properties where it was determined that the tenant will not be able to meet its requirements set forth by the taxing authority to be entitled to an abatement of real estate taxes. The abatement was applicable to prior periods, and as such the expense and related recovery recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 includes 36 months of real estate taxes, which attributed to approximately $0.6 million of the increase in same store operating expenses. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of approximately $0.1 million in snow removal expenses.
Acquisitions
and Dispositions
Net Operating Income
For a detailed reconciliation of our acquisitions and dispositions net operating income to net income, see the table above.
Subsequent to
January 1, 2016
, we acquired
88
buildings consisting of approximately
19.4 million
square feet, and sold
33
buildings consisting of approximately
5.2 million
square feet. For the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, the buildings acquired after
January 1, 2016
contributed approximately
$41.6 million
and
$4.2 million
to NOI, respectively. For the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, the buildings sold after
January 1, 2016
contributed approximately
$0.7 million
and
$9.4 million
to net operating income, respectively. Refer to Note 3 in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding buildings acquired or sold.
42
Table of Contents
Other Net Operating Income
Our other assets include our flex/office buildings, redevelopment buildings, buildings classified as held for sale, and buildings placed in service after
January 1, 2016
. It also includes asset management fee income, which is separated for purposes of calculating NOI for the total portfolio.
For a detailed reconciliation of our other net operating income to net income, see the table above.
At
September 30, 2017
we owned
14
flex/office buildings consisting of approximately
0.9 million
square feet, one building consisting of approximately 0.1 million square feet that were classified as held for sale,
one
redevelopment building consisting of approximately
0.3 million
square feet, and one building consisting of approximately 0.2 million square feet that was placed into service after
January 1, 2016
. These buildings contributed approximately $4.8 million and $4.8 million to NOI for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively. Additionally, we earned
$0.1 million
and
$0.2 million
in asset management fee income for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
and
September 30, 2016
, respectively.
Total Other Expenses
Total other expenses consist of general and administrative expense, property acquisition costs, depreciation and amortization, loss on impairments, loss on involuntary conversion, and other expenses.
Total other expenses
increased
$8.6 million
or
6.4%
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
to
$141.9 million
compared to
$133.3 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
. The increase was primarily related to an increase of approximately
$18.6 million
in depreciation and amortization as a result of buildings acquired which increased the depreciable asset base. This increase was also attributable to an increase in property acquisition costs of approximately
$1.6 million
which was due to increased acquisition volume during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
as compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
, as well as an increase in loss on involuntary conversion of approximately
$0.3 million
, as discussed in Note 3 of the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Other expenses also increased approximately
$0.6 million
which was primarily attributable to a gain on incentive fee due to the finalization of a one-time incentive fee payable to Columbus Nova Real Estate Acquisition Group, LLC as discussed in Note 10 of the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in loss on impairments as there were none recognized during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
, whereas there were nine buildings impaired for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
for a loss of approximately $11.2 million. Additionally, general and administrative expense decreased approximately
$1.3 million
, primarily attributable to a decrease of approximately $3.1 million related to the severance of a former executive officer during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
, which did not recur in 2017. These severance costs were partially offset by an increase in non-cash compensation expense related to the 2017 equity grants for employees and independent directors and other general and administrative expenses.
Total Other Income (Expense)
Total other income (expense) consists of interest income, interest expense, loss on extinguishment of debt, and gain on the sales of rental property. Interest expense includes interest incurred during the period as well as adjustments related to amortization of financing fees and debt issuance costs, amortization of fair market value adjustments associated with the assumption of debt, and gains or losses on hedge ineffectiveness.
Total net other expense increased
$0.1 million
or
1.0%
to
$12.3 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to
$12.2 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
. This increase was primarily the result of a decrease in the gain on the sales of rental property of approximately
$2.4 million
. This was partially offset by a decrease in loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately
$2.0 million
which was primarily attributable to the payment of prepayment fees for loans repaid during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
which did not recur in 2017. Additionally, interest expense decreased approximately
$0.3 million
which was primarily related to a decrease in the weighted average interest rate, as well as a gain on hedge ineffectiveness of approximately $0.1 million for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
, whereas there was no hedge ineffectiveness for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In this report, we disclose and discuss funds from operations (“FFO”) and NOI, which meet the definition of “non-GAAP financial measures” as set forth in Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). As a result, we are required to include in this report a statement of why management believes that presentation of these measures provides useful information to investors.
43
Table of Contents
Funds From Operations
FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (determined in accordance with GAAP) as an indication of our performance, and we believe that to understand our performance further, FFO should be compared with our reported net income or net loss in accordance with GAAP, as presented in our consolidated financial statements included in this report.
We calculate FFO in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). FFO represents GAAP net income (loss), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable operating buildings, impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate, real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs and fair market value of debt adjustment) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Management uses FFO as a supplemental performance measure because it is a widely recognized measure of the performance of REITs. FFO may be used by investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs.
However, because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization and captures neither the changes in the value of our buildings that result from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our buildings, all of which have real economic effects and could materially impact our results from operations, the utility of FFO as a measure of our performance is limited. In addition, other REITs may not calculate FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition as we do, and, accordingly, our FFO may not be comparable to such other REITs’ FFO. FFO should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, and is not indicative of funds available for our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of our FFO attributable to common stockholders and unit holders for the periods presented to net income (loss), the nearest GAAP equivalent.
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to FFO (in thousands)
2017
2016
2017
2016
Net income
$
21,839
$
130
$
23,276
$
2,521
Rental property depreciation and amortization
38,114
31,416
110,069
91,537
Loss on impairments
—
—
—
11,231
Gain on the sales of rental property, net
(17,563
)
(643
)
(19,225
)
(21,589
)
FFO
42,390
30,903
$
114,120
$
83,700
Preferred stock dividends
(2,449
)
(4,001
)
(7,345
)
(10,914
)
Other expenses
—
(95
)
—
(289
)
FFO attributable to common stockholders and unit holders
$
39,941
$
26,807
$
106,775
$
72,497
Net Operating Income
We consider NOI to be an appropriate supplemental performance measure to net income because we believe it helps investors and management understand the core operations of our buildings. NOI is defined as rental revenue, including reimbursements, less property expenses and real estate taxes and insurance. NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of our financial performance since it excludes expenses which could materially impact our results of operations. Further, our NOI may not be comparable to that of other real estate companies, as they may use different methodologies for calculating NOI.
44
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of our NOI for the periods presented to net income (loss), the nearest GAAP equivalent.
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) to NOI (in thousands)
2017
2016
2017
2016
Net income
$
21,839
$
130
$
23,276
$
2,521
Asset management fee income
(9
)
(60
)
(52
)
(166
)
General and administrative
8,380
7,603
25,090
26,373
Property acquisition costs
1,386
1,978
4,684
3,113
Depreciation and amortization
38,186
31,489
110,286
91,725
Interest income
(2
)
(3
)
(10
)
(8
)
Interest expense
10,446
10,504
31,557
31,841
Loss on impairments
—
—
—
11,231
Loss on involuntary conversion
—
—
330
—
Loss on extinguishment of debt
13
—
15
1,973
Other expenses
260
279
813
857
(Gain) loss on incentive fee
(202
)
—
689
—
Gain on the sales of rental property, net
(17,563
)
(643
)
(19,225
)
(21,589
)
Net operating income
$
62,734
$
51,277
$
177,453
$
147,871
Cash Flows
Comparison of the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
The following table summarizes our cash flows for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
.
Nine months ended September 30,
Change
Cash Flows (dollars in thousands)
2017
2016
$
%
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
120,517
$
97,905
$
22,612
23.1
%
Net cash used in investing activities
$
462,711
$
220,016
$
242,695
110.3
%
Net cash provided by financing activities
$
341,042
$
122,373
$
218,669
178.7
%
Net cash provided by operating activities
increased
$22.6 million
to
$120.5 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to
$97.9 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
. The increase was primarily attributable to incremental operating cash flows from property acquisitions completed after
September 30, 2016
, and operating performance at existing properties. These increases were partially offset by the loss of cash flows from property dispositions completed after
September 30, 2016
and fluctuations in working capital due to timing of payments and rental receipts.
Net cash used in investing activities
increased
$242.7 million
to
$462.7 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to
$220.0 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
. The increased cash outflow was primarily due to the acquisition of
42
buildings for a total cash consideration of approximately
$485.8 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to the acquisition of 23 buildings for a total cash consideration of approximately
$247.8 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
. The increase is also attributable to the sale of
nine
building during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
for net proceeds of approximately
$43.5 million
, compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
where we sold 14 buildings for net proceeds of approximately
$50.3 million
.
Net cash provided by financing activities
increased
$218.7 million
to
$341.0 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to
$122.4 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
. The change was primarily due to an increase in net cash inflow from our unsecured credit facility of approximately
$144.0 million
and an increase in proceeds from sales of common stock of approximately
$238.9 million
. These increases in net cash inflow were partially offset by the issuance of the 6.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series C Preferred Stock") on March 17, 2016 for
$75.0 million
whereas there were no preferred stock issuances during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
, as well as a
$0.009171
increase in the dividend paid per share during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
. Additionally there was an increase in the repayment of mortgage notes of approximately
$71.9 million
during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
compared to the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
.
45
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe that our liquidity needs will be satisfied through cash flows generated by operations, disposition proceeds, and financing activities. Operating cash flow is primarily rental income, expense recoveries from tenants, and other income from operations and is our principal source of funds that we use to pay operating expenses, debt service, recurring capital expenditures and the distributions required to maintain our REIT qualification. We look to the capital markets (common equity, preferred equity, and debt) to primarily fund our acquisition activity. We seek to increase cash flows from our properties by maintaining quality standards for our buildings that promote high occupancy rates and permit increases in rental rates while reducing tenant turnover and controlling operating expenses. We believe that our revenue, together with proceeds from building sales and debt and equity financings, will continue to provide funds for our short-term and medium-term liquidity needs.
Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of funds to pay for operating expenses and other expenditures directly associated with our buildings, including interest expense, interest rate swap payments, scheduled principal payments on outstanding indebtedness, funding of property acquisitions under contract, general and administrative expenses, and capital expenditures for tenant improvements and leasing commissions.
Our long-term liquidity needs, in addition to recurring short-term liquidity needs as discussed above, consist primarily of funds necessary to pay for acquisitions, non-recurring capital expenditures, and scheduled debt maturities. We intend to satisfy our long-term liquidity needs through cash flow from operations, the issuance of equity or debt securities, other borrowings, property dispositions, or, in connection with acquisitions of certain additional buildings, the issuance of common units in the Operating Partnership.
As of
September 30, 2017
, we had total immediate liquidity of approximately
$360.1 million
, comprised of
$11.0 million
of cash and cash equivalents and
$349.1 million
of immediate availability on our unsecured credit facility.
In addition, we require funds for future dividends to be paid to our common and preferred stockholders and common unit holders in our Operating Partnership. The table below sets forth the dividends attributable to our common stock that were declared or paid during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
. These distributions on our common stock are voluntary (at the discretion of our board of directors), to the extent we have satisfied distribution requirements in order to maintain our REIT status for federal income tax purposes, and may be reduced or stopped if needed to fund other liquidity requirements or for other reasons.
Month Ended 2017
Declaration Date
Record Date
Per Share
Payment Date
December 31
July 31, 2017
December 29, 2017
$
0.117500
January 16, 2018
November 30
July 31, 2017
November 30, 2017
0.117500
December 15, 2017
October 31
July 31, 2017
October 31, 2017
0.117500
November 15, 2017
September 30
May 1, 2017
September 29, 2017
0.117500
October 16, 2017
August 31
May 1, 2017
August 31, 2017
0.117500
September 15, 2017
July 31
May 1, 2017
July 31, 2017
0.117500
August 15, 2017
June 30
February 15, 2017
June 30, 2017
0.116667
July 17, 2017
May 31
February 15, 2017
May 31, 2017
0.116667
June 15, 2017
April 30
February 15, 2017
April 28, 2017
0.116667
May 15, 2017
March 31
November 2, 2016
March 31, 2017
0.116667
April 17, 2017
February 28
November 2, 2016
February 28, 2017
0.116667
March 15, 2017
January 31
November 2, 2016
January 31, 2017
0.116667
February 15, 2017
Total
$
1.405002
On
November 2, 2017
, our board of directors declared the common stock dividend for the months ending
January 31, 2018
,
February 28, 2018
and
March 31, 2018
at a monthly rate of
$0.118333
per share of common stock.
46
Table of Contents
We pay quarterly cumulative dividends on the 6.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock ("Series B Preferred Stock") and the Series C Preferred Stock (collectively, the "Preferred Stock Issuances") at a rate equivalent to the fixed annual rate of
$1.65625
and
$1.71875
per share, respectively. The table below sets forth the dividends on the Preferred Stock Issuances during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
.
Quarter Ended 2017
Declaration Date
Series B
Preferred Stock Per Share
Series C
Preferred Stock Per Share
Payment Date
September 30
July 31, 2017
$
0.4140625
$
0.4296875
September 29, 2017
June 30
May 1, 2017
0.4140625
0.4296875
June 30, 2017
March 31
February 15, 2017
0.4140625
0.4296875
March 31, 2017
Total
$
1.2421875
$
1.2890625
On
November 2, 2017
, our board of directors declared the Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock dividend for the quarter ending
December 31, 2017
at a quarterly rate of
$0.4140625
per share and
$0.4296875
per share, respectively.
Indebtedness Outstanding
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our indebtedness outstanding as of
September 30, 2017
.
Loan
Principal Outstanding as of September 30, 2017 (in thousands)
Interest
Rate
(1)
Maturity Date
Prepayment Terms
(2)
Unsecured credit facility:
Unsecured Credit Facility
(3)
$
245,000
L + 1.15%
Dec-18-2019
i
Total unsecured credit facility
245,000
Unsecured term loans:
Unsecured Term Loan C
150,000
L + 1.30%
Sep-29-2020
i
Unsecured Term Loan B
150,000
L + 1.30%
Mar-21-2021
i
Unsecured Term Loan A
150,000
L + 1.30%
Mar-31-2022
i
Unsecured Term Loan D
(4)
—
L + 1.30%
Jan-04-2023
i
Total unsecured term loans
450,000
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs
(3,934
)
Total carrying value unsecured term loans
446,066
Unsecured notes:
Series F Unsecured Notes
100,000
3.98
%
Jan-05-2023
ii
Series A Unsecured Notes
50,000
4.98
%
Oct-1-2024
ii
Series D Unsecured Notes
100,000
4.32
%
Feb-20-2025
ii
Series B Unsecured Notes
50,000
4.98
%
Jul-1-2026
ii
Series C Unsecured Notes
80,000
4.42
%
Dec-30-2026
ii
Series E Unsecured Notes
20,000
4.42
%
Feb-20-2027
ii
Total unsecured notes
400,000
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs
(1,832
)
Total carrying value unsecured notes
398,168
Mortgage notes (secured debt):
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association CMBS Loan
55,366
4.31
%
Dec-1-2022
iii
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
3,933
4.78
%
Dec-15-2023
iv
Total mortgage notes
59,299
Total unamortized fair market value premiums
63
Less: Total unamortized deferred financing fees and debt issuance costs
(667
)
Total carrying value mortgage notes
58,695
Total / weighted average interest rate
(5)
$
1,147,929
3.44
%
(1)
Interest rate as of
September 30, 2017
. At
September 30, 2017
, the one-month LIBOR (“L”) was
1.23222%
. The interest rate is not adjusted to include the amortization of deferred financing fees or debt issuance costs incurred in obtaining debt or any unamortized fair market value premiums. The spread over the applicable rate for our unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loans is based on our consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the respective loan agreements.
(2)
Prepayment terms consist of (i) pre-payable with no penalty; (ii) pre-payable with penalty; (iii) pre-payable without penalty three months prior to the maturity date, however can be defeased beginning January 1, 2016; and (iv) pre-payable without penalty three months prior to the maturity date.
(3)
The capacity of the unsecured credit facility is
$450.0 million
.
(4)
Capacity of
$150.0 million
, which we have until July 27, 2018 to draw.
(5)
The weighted average interest rate was calculated using the fixed interest rate swapped on the current notional amount of
$450.0 million
of debt, and is not adjusted to include the amortization of deferred financing fees or debt issuance costs incurred in obtaining debt or any unamortized fair market value premiums.
47
Table of Contents
The aggregate undrawn nominal commitments on the unsecured credit facility and unsecured term loans as of
September 30, 2017
was approximately
$349.1 million
, including issued letters of credit. Our actual borrowing capacity at any given point in time may be less and is restricted to a maximum amount based on our debt covenant compliance.
Our unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes, and mortgage notes are subject to ongoing compliance with a number of financial and other covenants. As of
September 30, 2017
, we were in compliance with the applicable financial covenants.
On August 1, 2017, the
three
mortgage notes held with Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, in which multiple properties served as collateral for the mortgage notes, were paid in full.
On July 28, 2017, we entered into a
$150.0 million
unsecured term loan agreement ("Unsecured Term Loan D"). As of September 30, 2017, the interest rate on the Unsecured Term Loan D was LIBOR plus a spread of
1.3%
based on our consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the loan agreement. Unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the loan agreement, the Unsecured Term Loan D will mature on January 4, 2023. The Unsecured Term Loan D has an accordion feature that allows us to increase its borrowing capacity to
$250.0 million
, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions and lender consents. The agreement includes a delayed draw feature that allows us to draw up to
six
advances of at least
$25.0 million
each until July 27, 2018. To the extent that we do not request advances of the $150.0 million of aggregate commitments by July 27, 2018, the unadvanced commitments terminate. We incurred approximately
$1.0 million
in deferred financing fees associated with the Unsecured Term Loan D, which are being amortized through the maturity date. We also are required to pay an annual fee of
$35,000
to be amortized over
one
year. The Unsecured Term Loan D has an unused commitment fee equal to
0.15%
of its unused commitment, which begins to accrue on October 26, 2017 and are due and payable monthly until the earlier of (i) the date that commitments of $150.0 million have been fully advanced, (ii) July 27, 2018, and (iii) the date that commitments of $150.0 million have been reduced to zero pursuant to our ability to terminate the aggregate commitments at any time upon notice. STAG Industrial, Inc. and certain wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership are guarantors of the Unsecured Term Loan D. The agreement also contains financial and other covenants substantially similar to the covenants in our unsecured credit facility.
On July 28, 2017, we entered into an amendment to our unsecured credit facility agreement and amendments to our unsecured term loan agreements to conform certain provisions to the Unsecured Term Loan D agreement.
The chart below details our debt capital structure as of
September 30, 2017
.
Debt Capital Structure
September 30, 2017
Total principal outstanding (in thousands)
$
1,154,299
Weighted average duration (years)
4.8
% Secured debt
5
%
% Debt maturing next 12 months
—
%
Net Debt to Real Estate Cost Basis
(1)
38
%
(1)
We define Net Debt as our amounts outstanding under our unsecured credit facility, unsecured term loans, unsecured notes, and mortgage notes, less cash and cash equivalents.
We define Real Estate Cost Basis as the book value of rental property and deferred leasing intangibles, exclusive of the related accumulated depreciation and amortization.
We regularly pursue new financing opportunities to ensure an appropriate balance sheet position. As a result of these dedicated efforts, we are confident in our ability to meet future debt maturities and building acquisition funding needs. We believe that our current balance sheet is in an adequate position at the date of this filing, despite possible volatility in the credit markets.
Our interest rate exposure as it relates to interest expense payments on our floating rate debt is managed through our use of interest rate swaps, which fix the rate of our long term floating rate debt. For a detailed discussion on our use of interest rate swaps, see “Interest Rate Risk” below.
48
Table of Contents
Equity
Preferred Stock
The table below sets forth our outstanding preferred stock issuances as of
September 30, 2017
.
Preferred Stock Issuances
Issuance Date
Number of Shares
Liquidation Value Per Share
Interest Rate
6.625% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
April 16, 2013
2,800,000
$
25.00
6.625
%
6.875% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock
March 17, 2016
3,000,000
$
25.00
6.875
%
The Preferred Stock Issuances rank on parity and ranks senior to our common stock with respect to dividend rights and
rights upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs. The Preferred Stock Issuances have no stated maturity date and are not subject to mandatory redemption or any sinking fund. Generally, we are not permitted to redeem the Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock prior to April 16, 2018 and March 17, 2021, respectively, except in limited circumstances relating to our ability to qualify as a REIT and in certain other circumstances related to a change of control.
C
ommon Stock
The following sets forth our at-the-market ("ATM") common stock offering program as of
September 30, 2017
. We may from time to time sell common stock through sales agents under the program.
ATM Stock Offering Program
Date
Maximum Aggregate Offering Price (in thousands)
Aggregate Common Stock Available as of
September 30, 2017 (in thousands)
2017 $300 million ATM
April 7, 2017
$
300,000
$
77,592
The tables below set forth the activity under our ATM common stock offering programs during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
(in thousands, except share data).
Three months ended September 30, 2017
ATM Stock Offering Program
Shares
Sold
Weighted Average Price Per Share
Gross
Proceeds
Sales
Agents’ Fee
Net
Proceeds
2017 $300 million ATM
2,409,453
$
27.08
$
65,239
$
815
$
64,424
Total/weighted average
2,409,453
$
27.08
$
65,239
$
815
$
64,424
Nine months ended September 30, 2017
ATM Stock Offering Program
Shares
Sold
Weighted Average Price Per Share
Gross
Proceeds
Sales
Agents’ Fee
Net
Proceeds
2017 $300 million ATM
8,366,212
$
26.58
$
222,408
$
2,666
$
219,742
2016 $228 million ATM
(1)
4,799,784
$
24.42
$
117,216
$
1,604
$
115,612
Total/weighted average
13,165,996
$
25.80
$
339,624
$
4,270
$
335,354
(1)
This program ended before
September 30, 2017
.
Subsequent to
September 30, 2017
, we sold
180,300
shares under our ATM common stock offering program for gross proceeds of approximately
$5.1 million
.
Noncontrolling Interest
We own our interests in all of our properties and conduct substantially all of our business through our Operating Partnership. We are the sole member of the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership. As of
September 30, 2017
, we owned approximately
95.8%
of the common units of our Operating Partnership, and our current and former executive officers, directors, senior employees and their affiliates, and third parties who contributed properties to us in exchange for common units in our Operating Partnership, owned the remaining
4.2%
.
On
May 31, 2017
, we acquired a property located in
San Diego, CA
. As partial consideration for the property, we granted
687,827
common units in the Operating Partnership with a fair value of approximately
$18.6 million
. The number of common units granted was calculated based on the trailing
five
-day average common stock price ending on the second business day that immediately preceded the grant date. The fair value of the common units granted was calculated based on our closing stock price on the New York Stock Exchange on the grant date multiplied by the number of common units granted. The issuance of the common units
49
Table of Contents
was effected in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities Act, as amended, and Regulation D promulgated thereunder. We relied on the exemption based on representations given by the holders of the common units. Subject to certain restrictions, the common units may be redeemed for cash or, at our election, common stock on a one for one basis, subject to adjustment, as provided in the operating partnership agreement.
Non-cash Compensation Expense
We recorded approximately
$6.9 million
in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
for the amortization of our equity incentive plan, excluding board of directors' compensation. We expect to recognize approximately
$9.2 million
for the year ending December 31,
2017
for the amortization of our equity incentive plan, excluding board of directors' compensation. The following table summarizes the expected amortization of our unrecognized compensation expense over the next five calendar years as of
September 30, 2017
.
Year
Future Amortization of Non-cash Compensation Expense (in thousands)
Remainder of 2017
$
2,307
2018
$
5,162
2019
$
3,593
2020
$
1,732
2021
$
113
Interest Rate Risk
We use interest rate swaps to fix the rate of our variable rate debt. As of
September 30, 2017
, all of our outstanding variable rate debt, with the exception of our unsecured credit facility, was fixed with interest rate swaps.
We recognize all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. If the derivative is designated as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives are either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), which is a component of equity. The ineffective portion of a derivative’s change in fair value is immediately recognized in earnings. Derivatives that are not designated as hedges must be adjusted to fair value and the changes in fair value must be reflected as income or expense.
We have established criteria for suitable counterparties in relation to various specific types of risk. We only use counterparties that have a credit rating of no lower than investment grade at swap inception from Moody’s Investor Services, Standard & Poor’s, or Fitch Ratings or other nationally recognized rating agencies.
50
Table of Contents
The following table details our outstanding interest rate swaps as of
September 30, 2017
.
Interest Rate
Derivative Counterparty
Trade Date
Effective Date
Notional Amount
(in thousands)
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Pay Fixed Interest Rate
Receive Variable Interest Rate
Maturity Date
Regions Bank
Mar-01-2013
Mar-01-2013
$
25,000
$
194
1.3300
%
One-month L
Feb-14-2020
Capital One, N.A.
Jun-13-2013
Jul-01-2013
$
50,000
$
(25
)
1.6810
%
One-month L
Feb-14-2020
Capital One, N.A.
Jun-13-2013
Aug-01-2013
$
25,000
$
(26
)
1.7030
%
One-month L
Feb-14-2020
Regions Bank
Sep-30-2013
Feb-03-2014
$
25,000
$
(196
)
1.9925
%
One-month L
Feb-14-2020
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Oct-14-2015
Sep-29-2016
$
25,000
$
255
1.3830
%
One-month L
Sep-29-2020
PNC Bank, N.A.
Oct-14-2015
Sep-29-2016
$
50,000
$
497
1.3906
%
One-month L
Sep-29-2020
Regions Bank
Oct-14-2015
Sep-29-2016
$
35,000
$
354
1.3858
%
One-month L
Sep-29-2020
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Oct-14-2015
Sep-29-2016
$
25,000
$
247
1.3950
%
One-month L
Sep-29-2020
Capital One, N.A.
Oct-14-2015
Sep-29-2016
$
15,000
$
148
1.3950
%
One-month L
Sep-29-2020
Royal Bank of Canada
Jan-08-2015
Mar-20-2015
$
25,000
$
52
1.7090
%
One-month L
Mar-21-2021
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Jan-08-2015
Mar-20-2015
$
25,000
$
50
1.7105
%
One-month L
Mar-21-2021
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Jan-08-2015
Sep-10-2017
$
100,000
$
(1,550
)
2.2255
%
One-month L
Mar-21-2021
Wells Fargo, N.A.
Jan-08-2015
Mar-20-2015
$
25,000
$
19
1.8280
%
One-month L
Mar-31-2022
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Jan-08-2015
Feb-14-2020
$
25,000
$
(196
)
2.4535
%
One-month L
Mar-31-2022
Regions Bank
Jan-08-2015
Feb-14-2020
$
50,000
$
(413
)
2.4750
%
One-month L
Mar-31-2022
Capital One, N.A.
Jan-08-2015
Feb-14-2020
$
50,000
$
(467
)
2.5300
%
One-month L
Mar-31-2022
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
Jul-20-2017
Oct-30-2017
$
25,000
$
75
1.8485
%
One-month L
Jan-04-2023
Royal Bank of Canada
Jul-20-2017
Oct-30-2017
$
25,000
$
76
1.8505
%
One-month L
Jan-04-2023
Wells Fargo, N.A.
Jul-20-2017
Oct-30-2017
$
25,000
$
76
1.8505
%
One-month L
Jan-04-2023
PNC Bank, N.A.
Jul-20-2017
Oct-30-2017
$
25,000
$
75
1.8485
%
One-month L
Jan-04-2023
PNC Bank, N.A.
Jul-20-2017
Oct-30-2017
$
50,000
$
152
1.8475
%
One-month L
Jan-04-2023
The swaps outlined in the above table were all designated as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, and all are valued as Level 2 financial instruments. Level 2 financial instruments are defined as significant other observable inputs. As of
September 30, 2017
, the fair value of
14
of our
21
interest rate swaps were in an asset position of approximately
$2.3 million
and
7
interest rate swaps were in a liability position of approximately
$2.9 million
, including any adjustment for nonperformance risk related to these agreements.
As of
September 30, 2017
, we had
$695.0 million
of variable rate debt. As of
September 30, 2017
, all of our outstanding variable rate debt, with exception of our unsecured credit facility, was fixed with interest rate swaps. To the extent interest rates increase, interest costs on our floating rate debt not fixed with interest rate swaps will increase, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to pay principal and interest on our debt and our ability to make distributions to our security holders. From time to time, we may enter into interest rate swap agreements and other interest rate hedging contracts, including swaps, caps and floors. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amounts third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to change our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions.
Off-balance Sheet Arrangements
As of
September 30, 2017
, we had letters of credit related to development projects and certain other agreements of approximately
$5.9 million
. As of
September 30, 2017
, we had no other material off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. The primary market risk we are exposed to is interest rate risk. We have used derivative financial instruments to manage, or hedge, interest rate risks related to our borrowings, primarily through interest rate swaps.
As of
September 30, 2017
, we had
$695.0 million
of outstanding variable rate debt, all of which, with the exception of
$245.0 million
outstanding under our unsecured credit facility, was fixed with interest rate swaps. To the extent we undertake additional variable rate indebtedness, if interest rates increase, then so will the interest costs on our unhedged variable rate debt, which could adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to pay principal and interest on our debt and our ability to make distributions to our security holders. Further, rising interest rates could limit our ability to refinance existing debt when it matures or significantly increase our future interest expense. From time to time, we enter into interest rate swap agreements and other interest rate hedging contracts, including swaps, caps and floors. While these agreements are intended to lessen the impact of rising interest rates on us, they also expose us to the risk that the other parties to the agreements will not perform, we could incur significant costs associated
51
Table of Contents
with the settlement of the agreements, the agreements will be unenforceable and the underlying transactions will fail to qualify as highly-effective cash flow hedges under GAAP. In addition, an increase in interest rates could decrease the amounts third parties are willing to pay for our assets, thereby limiting our ability to change our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. If interest rates increased by 100 basis
points and assuming we had an outstanding balance of
$245.0 million
on the unsecured credit facility (the portion outstanding at
September 30, 2017
not fixed by interest rate swaps) for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
, our interest expense would have increased by approximately
$1.8 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we have evaluated, under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act, as of
September 30, 2017
. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures for the periods covered by this report were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by our Company in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls
There was no change to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
September 30, 2017
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
52
Table of Contents
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are a party to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently a party, as plaintiff or defendant, to any legal proceedings which, individually or in the aggregate, would be expected to have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations if determined adversely to our company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the SEC on February 16, 2017.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety
Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
53
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Number
Description of Document
10.1 *
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2017, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., and the other lenders party thereto
10.2 *
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2017, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto
10.3 *
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2017, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto
10.4 *
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2017, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto
10.5 *
Second Amendment to Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2017, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto
31.1 *
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 *
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 *
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101 *
The following materials from STAG Industrial, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) related notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
*
Filed herewith.
54
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
STAG INDUSTRIAL, INC.
Date: November 2, 2017
BY:
/s/
WILLIAM R. CROOKER
William R. Crooker
Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
55
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit Number
Description of Document
10.1 *
Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2017, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Bank of America, N.A., and the other lenders party thereto
10.2 *
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2017, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto
10.3 *
First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2017, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto
10.4 *
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2017, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto
10.5 *
Second Amendment to Term Loan Agreement, dated as of July 28, 2017, by and among STAG Industrial Operating Partnership, L.P., STAG Industrial, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and the other lenders party thereto
31.1 *
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 *
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1 *
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101 *
The following materials from STAG Industrial, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) related notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
*
Filed herewith.
56