Goldman Sachs - 10-Q quarterly report FY

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (Group Inc.), a Delaware corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the firm), is a leading global financial services firm providing investment banking, securities and investment management services to a substantial and diversified client base that includes corporations, financial institutions, governments andhigh-net-worthindividuals. Founded in 1869, the firm is headquartered in New York and maintains offices in London, Frankfurt, Tokyo, Hong Kong and other major financial centers around the world.

The firm’s activities are divided into three segments:

These condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Group Inc. and all other entities in which the firm has a controlling financial interest. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

The firm determines whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity by first evaluating whether the entity is a voting interest entity, a variable interest entity (VIE) or a qualifyingspecial-purposeentity (QSPE) under generally accepted accounting principles.

These condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the firm’s Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended November 28, 2008. The condensed consolidated financial information as of November 28, 2008 has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements not included herein.

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. These adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. Interim period operating results may not be indicative of the operating results for a full year.

In connection with becoming a bank holding company, the firm was required to change its fiscal year-end from November to December. This change in the firm’s fiscal year-end resulted in aone-monthtransition period that began on November 29, 2008 and ended on December 26, 2008. Financial information for this fiscal transition period is included in these condensed consolidated financial statements. On April 13, 2009, the Board of Directors of Group Inc. (the Board) approved a change in the firm’s fiscal year-end from the last Friday of December to December 31, beginning with fiscal 2009. Fiscal 2009 began on December 27, 2008 and will end on December 31, 2009. The firm’s second and third fiscal quarters in 2009 will end on the last Friday of June and September, respectively. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2009, the firm’s fiscal year will end on December 31.

In the condensed consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows and comprehensive income, the firm compares thethree-monthperiod ended March 27, 2009 with the previously reportedthree-monthperiod ended February 29, 2008. Financial information for the three months ended March 28, 2008 has not been included in thisForm 10-Qfor the following reasons: (i) the three months ended February 29, 2008 provide a meaningful comparison for the three months ended March 27, 2009; (ii) there are no significant factors, seasonal or other, that would impact the comparability of information if the results for the three months ended March 28, 2008 were presented in lieu of results for the three months ended February 29, 2008; and (iii) it was not practicable or cost justified to prepare this information.

All references to March 2009 and February 2008, unless specifically stated otherwise, refer to the firm’sthree-monthfiscal periods ended, or the dates, as the context requires, March 27, 2009 and February 29, 2008, respectively. All references to December 2008, unless specifically stated otherwise, refer to the firm’s fiscalone-monthtransition period ended, or the date, as the context requires, December 26, 2008. All references to November 2008, unless specifically stated otherwise, refer to the firm’s fiscal year ended, or the date, as the context requires, November 28, 2008. All references to 2009, unless specifically stated otherwise, refer to the firm’s fiscal year ending, or the date, as the context requires, December 31, 2009. Certain reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.

These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles that require management to make certain estimates and assumptions. The most important of these estimates and assumptions relate to fair value measurements, the accounting for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets and the provision for potential losses that may arise from litigation and regulatory proceedings and tax audits. Although these and other estimates and assumptions are based on the best available information, actual results could be materially different from these estimates.

Investment Banking.  Underwriting revenues and fees from mergers and acquisitions and other financial advisory assignments are recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings when the services related to the underlying transaction are completed under the terms of the engagement. Expenses associated with such transactions are deferred until the related revenue is recognized or the engagement is otherwise concluded. Underwriting revenues are presented net of related expenses. Expenses associated with financial advisory transactions are recorded asnon-compensationexpenses, net of client reimbursements.

Trading Assets and Trading Liabilities.  Substantially all trading assets and trading liabilities are reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition at fair value, pursuant principally to:

Related unrealized gains or losses are generally recognized in “Trading and principal investments” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings.

Other Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities at Fair Value.  In addition to “Trading assets, at fair value” and “Trading liabilities, at fair value,” the firm has elected to account for certain of its other financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value under the fair value option. The primary reasons for electing the fair value option are to reflect economic events in earnings on a timely basis, to mitigate volatility in earnings from using different measurement attributes and to address simplification andcost-benefitconsiderations.

Such financial assets and financial liabilities accounted for at fair value include:

Fair Value Measurements.  The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., the exit price). Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs.

SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS No. 157 are described below:

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The firm defines active markets for equity instruments based on the average daily trading volume both in absolute terms and relative to the market capitalization for the instrument. The firm defines active markets for debt instruments based on both the average daily trading volume and the number of days with trading activity.

During the fourth quarter of 2008, both the FASB and the staff of the SEC re-emphasized the importance of sound fair value measurement in financial reporting. In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP)No. FAS 157-3,“Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active.” This statement clarifies that determining fair value in an inactive or dislocated market depends on facts and circumstances and requires significant management judgment. This statement specifies that it is acceptable to use inputs based on management estimates or assumptions, or for management to make adjustments to observable inputs to determine

Credit risk is an essential component of fair value. Cash products (e.g., bonds and loans) and derivative instruments (particularly those with significant future projected cash flows) trade in the market at levels which reflect credit considerations. The firm calculates the fair value of derivative assets by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates counterparty credit spreads and the fair value of derivative liabilities by discounting future cash flows at a rate which incorporates the firm’s own credit spreads. In doing so, credit exposures are adjusted to reflect mitigants, namely collateral agreements which reduce exposures based on triggers and contractual posting requirements. The firm manages its exposure to credit risk as it does other market risks and will price, economically hedge, facilitate and intermediate trades which involve credit risk. The firm records liquidity valuation adjustments to reflect the cost of exiting concentrated risk positions, including exposure to the firm’s own credit spreads.

In determining fair value, the firm separates its “Trading assets, at fair value” and its “Trading liabilities, at fair value” into two categories: cash instruments and derivative contracts.

Collateralized Agreements and Financings.  Collateralized agreements consist of resale agreements and securities borrowed. Collateralized financings consist of repurchase agreements, securities loaned and other secured financings. Interest on collateralized agreements and collateralized financings is recognized in “Interest income” and “Interest expense,” respectively, over the life of the transaction.

Hybrid Financial Instruments.  Hybrid financial instruments are instruments that contain bifurcatable embedded derivatives under SFAS No. 133 and do not require settlement by physical delivery ofnon-financialassets (e.g., physical commodities). If the firm elects to bifurcate the embedded derivative, it is accounted for at fair value and the host contract is accounted for at amortized cost, adjusted for the effective portion of any fair value hedge accounting relationships. If the firm does not elect to bifurcate, the entire hybrid financial instrument is accounted for at fair value under SFAS No. 155. See Notes 3 and 6 for further information regarding hybrid financial instruments.

Transfers of Financial Assets.  In general, transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales under SFAS No. 140 when the firm has relinquished control over the transferred assets. For transfers accounted for as sales, any related gains or losses are recognized in net revenues. Transfers that are not accounted for as sales are accounted for as collateralized financings, with the related interest expense recognized in net revenues over the life of the transaction.

Commissions.  Commission revenues from executing and clearing client transactions on stock, options and futures markets are recognized in “Trading and principal investments” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings on atrade-datebasis.

Insurance Activities.  Certain of the firm’s insurance and reinsurance contracts are accounted for at fair value under SFAS No. 159, with changes in fair value included in “Trading and principal investments” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings.

Revenues from variable annuity and life insurance and reinsurance contracts not accounted for at fair value under SFAS No. 159 generally consist of fees assessed on contract holder account balances for mortality charges, policy administration fees and surrender charges, and are recognized within “Trading and principal investments” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings in the period that services are provided.

Interest credited to variable annuity and life insurance and reinsurance contract account balances and changes in reserves are recognized in “Other expenses” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings.

Premiums earned for underwriting property catastrophe reinsurance are recognized within “Trading and principal investments” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings over the coverage period, net of premiums ceded for the cost of reinsurance. Expenses for liabilities related to property catastrophe reinsurance claims, including estimates of losses that have been incurred but not reported, are recognized within “Other expenses” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings.

Merchant Banking Overrides.  The firm is entitled to receive merchant banking overrides (i.e., an increased share of a fund’s income and gains) when the return on the funds’ investments exceeds certain threshold returns. Overrides are based on investment performance over the life of each merchant banking fund, and future investment underperformance may require amounts of override previously distributed to the firm to be returned to the funds. Accordingly, overrides are recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings only when all material contingencies have been resolved. Overrides are included in “Trading and principal investments” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings.

Asset Management.  Management fees are recognized over the period that the related service is provided based upon average net asset values. In certain circumstances, the firm is also entitled to receive incentive fees based on a percentage of a fund’s return or when the return on assets under management exceeds specified benchmark returns or other performance targets. Incentive fees are generally based on investment performance over a12-monthperiod and are subject to adjustment prior to the end of the measurement period. Accordingly, incentive fees are recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings when the measurement period ends. Asset management fees and incentive fees are included in “Asset management and securities services” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings.

The firm accounts forshare-basedcompensation in accordance withSFAS No. 123-R,“Share-BasedPayment.” The cost of employee services received in exchange for ashare-basedaward is generally measured based on the grant-date fair value of the award.Share-basedawards that do not require future service (i.e., vested awards, including awards granted to retirement-eligible employees) are expensed immediately.Share-basedemployee awards that require future service are amortized over the relevant service period. Expected forfeitures are included in determiningshare-basedemployee compensation expense. In the first quarter of 2006, the firm adoptedSFAS No. 123-Runder the modified prospective adoption method. Under this method of adoption, the provisions ofSFAS No. 123-Rare generally applied only toshare-basedawards granted subsequent to adoption.Share-basedawards held by employees that were retirement-eligible on the date of adoption ofSFAS No. 123-Rcontinue to be amortized over the stated service period of the award.

The firm pays cash dividend equivalents on outstanding restricted stock units. Dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock units are generally charged to retained earnings. Dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock units expected to be forfeited are included in compensation expense. The firm adopted Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) IssueNo. 06-11,“Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends onShare-BasedPayment Awards” in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Accordingly, the tax benefit related to dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock units is accounted for as an increase to additionalpaid-incapital. Prior to the adoption of EITF IssueNo. 06-11,the firm accounted for this tax benefit as a reduction to income tax expense. See “— Recent Accounting Developments” for further information on EITF IssueNo. 06-11.

In certain cases, primarily related to the death of an employee or conflicted employment (as outlined in the applicable award agreements), the firm may cash settleshare-basedcompensation awards. For awards accounted for as equity instruments, “Additionalpaid-incapital” is adjusted to the extent of the difference between the current value of the award and the grant-date value of the award.

Goodwill is the cost of acquired companies in excess of the fair value of identifiable net assets at acquisition date. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill is tested at least annually for impairment. An impairment loss is recognized if the estimated fair value of an operating segment, which is a component one level below the firm’s three business segments, is less than its estimated net book value. Such loss is calculated as the difference between the estimated fair value of goodwill and its carrying value.

Identifiable intangible assets, which consist primarily of customer lists, Designated Market Maker (DMM) rights and the value of business acquired (VOBA) and deferred acquisition costs (DAC) in the firm’s insurance subsidiaries, are amortized over their estimated lives in accordance with SFAS No. 142 or, in the case of insurance contracts, in accordance with SFAS No. 60, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises,” and SFAS No. 97, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for CertainLong-DurationContracts and for Realized Gains and Losses from the Sale of Investments.” Identifiable intangible assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset’s or asset group’s carrying value may not be fully recoverable in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal ofLong-LivedAssets,” or SFAS No. 60 and SFAS No. 97. An impairment loss, generally calculated as the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of an asset or asset group, is recognized if the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset or asset group is less than the corresponding carrying value.

Property, leasehold improvements and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization, are recorded at cost and included in “Other assets” in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.

Substantially all property and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the asset. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease, whichever is shorter. Certain costs of software developed or obtained for internal use are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the useful life of the software.

Property, leasehold improvements and equipment are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that an asset’s or asset group’s carrying value may not be fully recoverable in accordance with SFAS No. 144. An impairment loss, calculated as the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of an asset or asset group, is recognized if the sum of the expected undiscounted cash flows relating to the asset or asset group is less than the corresponding carrying value.

The firm’s operating leases include office space held in excess of current requirements. Rent expense relating to space held for growth is included in “Occupancy” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings. In accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” the firm records a liability, based on the fair value of the remaining lease rentals reduced by any potential or existing sublease rentals, for leases where the firm has ceased using the space and management has concluded that the firm will not derive any future economic benefits. Costs to terminate a lease before the end of its term are recognized and measured at fair value upon termination.

Assets and liabilities denominated innon-U.S. currenciesare translated at rates of exchange prevailing on the date of the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, and revenues and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange for the period. Gains or losses on translation of the financial statements of anon-U.S. operation,when the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, are included, net of hedges and taxes, in the condensed consolidated statements

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of the firm’s assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are established to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that more likely than not will be realized. The firm’s tax assets and liabilities are presented as a component of “Other assets” and “Other liabilities and accrued expenses,” respectively, in the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Tax provisions are computed in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” The firm adopted the provisions of FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” as of December 1, 2007, and recorded a transition adjustment resulting in a reduction of $201 million to beginning retained earnings in the first fiscal quarter of 2008. Under FIN 48, a tax position can be recognized in the financial statements only when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority based on the technical merits of the position. A position that meets this standard is measured at the largest amount of benefit that will more likely than not be realized upon settlement. A liability is established for differences between positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the financial statements. The firm reports interest expense related to income tax matters in “Provision/(benefit) for taxes” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings and income tax penalties in “Other expenses” in the condensed consolidated statements of earnings.

Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net earnings applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Common shares outstanding includes common stock and restricted stock units for which no future service is required as a condition to the delivery of the underlying common stock. Diluted EPS includes the determinants of basic EPS and, in addition, reflects the dilutive effect of the common stock deliverable pursuant to stock warrants and options and to restricted stock units for which future service is required as a condition to the delivery of the underlying common stock. The firm adopted FSP No. EITF03-6-1,“Determining Whether Instruments Granted inShare-BasedPayment Transactions Are Participating Securities,” in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Accordingly, the firm treats unvestedshare-basedpayment awards that havenon-forfeitablerights to dividend or dividend equivalents as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share. See“— RecentAccounting Developments” for further information on FSP No. EITF03-6-1.

The firm defines cash equivalents as highly liquid overnight deposits held in the ordinary course of business. As of March 2009, November 2008 and December 2008, “Cash and cash equivalents” on the condensed consolidated statements of financial condition included $4.03 billion, $5.60 billion and $1.39 billion, respectively, of cash and due from banks and $31.39 billion, $10.14 billion and $12.41 billion, respectively, of interest-bearing deposits with banks.

EITF IssueNo. 06-11.  In June 2007, the EITF reached consensus on IssueNo. 06-11,“Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends onShare-BasedPayment Awards.” EITF IssueNo. 06-11requires that the tax benefit related to dividend equivalents paid on restricted stock units, which are expected to vest, be recorded as an increase to additionalpaid-incapital. The firm previously accounted for this tax benefit as a reduction to income tax expense. EITF IssueNo. 06-11was applied prospectively for tax benefits on dividends declared beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The adoption of EITF IssueNo. 06-11did not have a material effect on the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

FASB Staff PositionNo. FAS 140-3.  In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff PositionNo. FAS 140-3,“Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions.” FSPNo. FAS 140-3requires an initial transfer of a financial asset and a repurchase financing that was entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation of the initial transfer to be evaluated as a linked transaction under SFAS No. 140 unless certain criteria are met, including that the transferred asset must be readily obtainable in the marketplace. The firm adopted FSPNo. FAS 140-3for new transactions entered into after November 2008. The adoption of FSPNo. FAS 140-3did not have a material effect on the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

SFAS No. 161.  In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.” SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, and was effective for the firm beginning in theone-monthtransition period ended December 2008. Since SFAS No. 161 requires only additional disclosures concerning derivatives and hedging activities, adoption of SFAS No. 161 did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

FASB Staff Position No. EITF03-6-1.  In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF03-6-1,“Determining Whether Instruments Granted inShare-BasedPayment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” The FSP addresses whether instruments granted inshare-basedpayment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and therefore need to be included in the earnings allocation in calculating earnings per share under the two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” The FSP requires companies to treat unvestedshare-basedpayment awards that havenon-forfeitablerights to dividend or dividend equivalents as a separate class of securities in calculating earnings per share. The firm adopted the FSP in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. There was no impact from the adoption of FSP No. EITF03-6-1 to earnings per common share for the three months ended March 2009. The loss per common share for the one month ended December 2008 was computed in accordance with the FSP and the impact was a loss per common share of $0.03. Prior periods have not been restated due to immateriality.

SFAS No. 141(R).  In December 2007, the FASB issued a revision to SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.” SFAS No. 141(R) requires changes to the accounting for transaction costs, certain contingent assets and liabilities, and other balances in a business combination. In addition, in partial acquisitions, when control is obtained, the acquiring company must measure and record all of the target’s assets and liabilities, including goodwill, at fair value as if the entire target company had been acquired. The provisions of SFAS No. 141(R) apply to business combinations beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, but may have an effect on accounting for future business combinations.

SFAS No. 160.  In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51.” SFAS No. 160 requires that ownership interests in consolidated subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent (i.e., noncontrolling interests) be accounted for and presented as equity, rather than as a liability or mezzanine equity. SFAS No. 160 was effective for the firm beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. SFAS No. 160 did not have a material effect on the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

FASB Staff PositionNo. FAS 140-4and FIN 46(R)-8.  In December 2008, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 140-4and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities.” FSPNo. FAS 140-4and FIN 46(R)-8 requires enhanced disclosures about transfers of financial assets and interests in variable interest entities, and was effective for the firm beginning in theone-monthtransition period ended December 2008. Since the FSP requires only additional disclosures concerning transfers of financial assets and interests in variable interest entities, adoption of the FSP did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

EITF IssueNo. 07-5.  In June 2008, the EITF reached consensus on IssueNo. 07-5,“Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity’s Own Stock.” EITF IssueNo. 07-5provides guidance about whether an instrument (such as the firm’s outstanding common stock warrants) should be classified as equity and notmarked-to-marketfor accounting purposes. The firm adopted EITF IssueNo. 07-5in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. Adoption of EITF IssueNo. 07-5did not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

FASB Staff PositionNo. FAS 157-4.  In April 2009, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 157-4,“Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly.” The FSP provides guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have decreased significantly. Specifically, the FSP lists factors which should be evaluated to determine whether a transaction is orderly, clarifies that adjustments to transactions or quoted prices may be necessary when the volume and level of activity for an asset or liability have decreased significantly, and provides guidance for determining the concurrent weighting of the transaction price relative to fair value indications from other valuation techniques when estimating fair value. The FSP is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. Because the firm’s current fair value methodology is consistent with FSPNo. FAS 157-4,adoption of the FSP will not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The firm will adopt the FSP in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 to comply with the FSP’s disclosure requirements.

FASB Staff PositionNo. FAS 115-2andFAS 124-2.  In April 2009, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 115-2andFAS 124-2,“Recognition and Presentation ofOther-Than-TemporaryImpairments.” Under the FSP, only the portion of another-than-temporaryimpairment on a debt security related to credit loss is recognized in current period earnings, with the remainder recognized in other comprehensive income, if the holder does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that the holder will not be required to sell the security prior to recovery. Currently, the entireother-than-temporaryimpairment is recognized in current period earnings. The FSP is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. The firm will adopt the FSP in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Adoption of the FSP will not have a material effect on the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

FASB Staff PositionNo. FAS 107-1and APB28-1.  In April 2009, the FASB issued FSPNo. FAS 107-1and APB28-1,“Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” The FSP requires that the fair value disclosures prescribed by FASB Statement No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” be included in financial statements prepared for interim periods. The FSP is effective for periods ending after June 15, 2009. The firm will adopt the FSP in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. Since the FSP involves only additional disclosures regarding the fair value of financial instruments, adoption of the FSP will not affect the firm’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

The following table sets forth the firm’s trading assets, at fair value, including those pledged as collateral, and trading liabilities, at fair value. At any point in time, the firm may use cash instruments as well as derivatives to manage a long or short risk position.

The firm’s financial assets at fair value classified within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy are summarized below:

The following tables set forth by level within the fair value hierarchy “Trading assets, at fair value,” “Trading liabilities, at fair value,” and other financial assets and financial liabilities accounted for at fair value under SFAS No. 155 and SFAS No. 159 as of March 2009, November 2008 and December 2008. See Note 2 for further information on the fair value hierarchy. As required by SFAS No. 157, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.