(Mark One)|X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002.
OR
|_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _____________ TO _____________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-24235
GUARANTY BANCSHARES, INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
100 W. ARKANSASMT. PLEASANT, TEXAS 75455(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
903-572-9881(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be file by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.|X| Yes |_| No
As of November 12, 2002, there were 2,996,428 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding.
2
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
4
5
6
7
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Guaranty (TX) Capital Trust I and Guaranty Financial Corp., Inc., which wholly owns Guaranty Bond Bank, formally Guaranty Bank and one non-bank subsidiary, Guaranty Company. Guaranty Bond Bank has two wholly owned non-bank subsidiaries, Guaranty Leasing Company, and GB Com, Inc. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for a complete presentation of financial position. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company on a consolidated basis, and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. These financial statements and the notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2002. Except for changes implemented due to recent accounting pronouncements as discussed below, the Company has consistently followed the accounting policies described in the Annual Report in preparing this Form 10-Q. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2002.
In preparation of the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions, which are based on information available at the time such estimates and assumptions are made. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, future results may differ if the actual amounts and events are not the same as the estimates and assumptions of management. The collectability of loans, fair value of financial instruments and other real estate and status of contingencies are particularly subject to change.
On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted new accounting policies related to goodwill, intangibles and other long-lived assets in accordance with several recently issued accounting pronouncements. Our new accounting policies are discussed below:
Goodwill: On January 1, 2002, the Company stopped amortizing goodwill and adopted a new policy for measuring goodwill for impairment. The Company has completed its initial impairment test and no impairment of goodwill was recognized in connection with the adoption of this new policy. Under the new policy, goodwill is assigned to reporting units. The Company currently operates as a single reporting unit and all of our goodwill is associated with the entire Company. Goodwill is then tested for impairment at least annually, or on an interim basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more-likely-than-not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. Goodwill is tested for impairment using a two-step approach. The first step is to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is greater than its carrying amount, goodwill is not considered impaired and the second step is not required. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the second step of the impairment test measures the amount of the impairment loss, if any. The second step of the impairment test is to compare the implied fair value of goodwill to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is calculated in the same manner that goodwill is calculated in a business combination, whereby the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price. The excess “purchase price” over the amounts assigned to assets and liabilities would be the implied fair value of goodwill.
8
The following table presents reported net income and basic earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001 and 2002 adjusted to exclude goodwill amortization expense assuming the new standards were applied effective January 1, 2001 (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets: Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful life. Intangible assets, premises and equipment and other long-lived assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable from future undiscounted cash flows. If impaired, the assets are recorded at fair value.
The following accounting standards were issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2002:
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections.” SFAS 145 clarifies and simplifies existing accounting pronouncements related to gains and losses from debt extinguishments and certain lease modifications and eliminates certain transitional accounting standards that are no longer necessary. This statement also makes minor technical corrections to various other existing pronouncements. Certain provisions of this statement will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2003, while other provisions became effective for transactions occurring and financial statements issued after May 15, 2002. Adoption of the provisions of this statement that were effective after May 15, 2002 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements. Furthermore, adoption of the remaining provisions of this statement on January 1, 2003 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
SFAS No. 147, “Acquisitions of Certain Financial Institutions, an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 72 and 144 and FASB Interpretation No. 9.”SFAS 147 removes acquisitions of financial institutions from the scope of both SFAS 72, “Accounting for Certain Acquisitions of Banking or Thrift Institutions,” and FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 9,“Applying APB Opinions No. 16 and 17 When a Savings and Loan Association or a Similar Institution Is Acquired in a Business Combination Accounted for by the Purchase Method,” and requires such transactions be accounted for in accordance with SFAS 141, “Business Combinations,” and SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” In addition, SFAS 147 amends SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” to include in its scope long-term customer-relationship intangible assets of financial institutions such as depositor- and borrower-relationship intangible assets and credit cardholder intangible assets. The provisions of SFAS 147 became effective on October 1, 2002. Adoption of this statement is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
9
Earnings per share is computed in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, which requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) for entities with complex capital structures. Basic EPS is based on net earnings divided by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS includes the dilutive effect of stock options granted using the treasury stock method.
The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share computations were as follows:
In 2000, the Company granted nonqualified stock options to certain executive officers of the Company and Guaranty Bond Bank under the Company’s 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. The grants consist of eight-year options to purchase 89,500 shares at an exercise price of $9.30 per share, which was the market price of the Company’s stock on the date the options were granted. In February 2002, the Company granted eight-year options to purchase 20,000 shares at an exercise price of $12.50 per share, which was the market price of the Company’s stock on the date the options were granted. The options fully vest and become exercisable in five equal installments commencing on the first anniversary of the date of grant and annually thereafter. At September 30, 2002, 2,000 shares of the options have been exercised and 890,500 options remain available for future grant under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan.
The weighted-average fair value per share of options granted during 2002 is $4.09. The fair value of options granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: Dividend yield of 2.24%, expected volatility of 28.7%, risk-free interest rate of 5.0%, and an expected life of 8.00 years.
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into various transactions, which, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, are not included in the consolidated balance sheets. These transactions are referred to as “off-balance sheet commitments.” The Company enters into these transactions to meet the financing needs of its customers. These transactions include commitments to extend credit and letters of credit, which involve elements of credit risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company minimizes its exposure to loss under these commitments by subjecting them to credit approval and monitoring procedures.
The Company enters into contractual commitments to extend credit, normally with fixed expiration dates or termination clauses, at specified rates and for specific purposes. Customers use credit commitments to ensure that funds will be available for working capital purposes, for capital expenditures and to ensure access to funds at specified terms and conditions. Substantially all of the Company’s commitments to extend credit are contingent upon customers maintaining specific credit standards at the time of loan funding. Management assesses the credit risk associated with certain commitments to extend credit in determining the level of the allowance for credit losses.
10
Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The Company’s policies generally require that letters of credit arrangements contain security and debt covenants similar to those contained in loan agreements.
Outstanding commitments and letters of credit are approximately as follows (dollars in thousands):
The Company is subject to various claims and legal actions occurring in the normal course of business. The Company accrues for estimated losses in the accompanying financial statements for those matters where management believes the likelihood of an adverse outcome is probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. After consultation with legal counsel, management currently believes the outcome of outstanding legal proceedings, claims and litigation involving the Company will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operation.
Guaranty Leasing Company, a non-bank subsidiary of the Bank, is a substantial partner in various complex equipment leasing transactions primarily originated in 1992, 1994 and 1995 involving leveraged leases. During 2001 and 1998, Guaranty Leasing was informed by the Internal Revenue Service (the “Service”) that certain losses taken by the Partnership during 1992 and 1994 through 1996 amounting to approximately $1.6 million would be disallowed. In September 2002, the Partnership received a final notice. The notice proposes adjustments to the partnership tax return as outlined above. The Company plans to appeal the Service’s proposed adjustments and to actively contest the Service’s position. If the Service is ultimately successful in re-determining the amount of the Partnership’s taxable loss, the Company would be required to pay an estimated $540,000 in additional taxes for these tax years.
There can be no assurance that the Service will not contest and ultimately disallow additional similar types of deductions and losses for other open tax years by the Partnerships in which Guaranty Leasing has ownership. If the Service is successful in its challenge of the Partnership’s losses, the potential additional tax liability to the Company may have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements.
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include forward-looking information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are subject to the “Safe Harbor” created by those sections. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following factors: competitive pressure in the banking industry significantly increasing; changes in the interest rate environment reducing margins; general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally, are less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality and an increase in the provision for loan losses; changes in the regulatory environment; changes in business conditions; volatility of rate sensitive deposits; operational risks including data processing system failures or fraud; asset/liability matching risks and liquidity risks; and changes in the securities markets and the factors contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
11
These risks and uncertainties are beyond the Company’s control and, in many cases, the Company cannot predict the risks and uncertainties that could cause its actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements. When used in this document, the words “believes,” “plans,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “continue,” “may,” “will,” “should” or the negative of such terms and similar expressions as they relate to the Company, its customers or its management are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
Guaranty Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) is a registered bank holding company that derives substantially all of its revenues and income from the operation of its subsidiary, Guaranty Bond Bank (the “Bank”). The Bank is a full service bank that provides a broad line of financial products and services to small and medium-sized businesses and consumers through ten banking locations in the Texas communities of Mount Pleasant (two offices), Bogata, Commerce, Deport, Paris, Pittsburg, Sulphur Springs, Talco, and Texarkana. The Company also maintains a loan production office in Fort Stockton, Texas.
Net earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 were $3.2 million or $1.06 per share (basic) and $1.05 per share (diluted) compared with $2.3 million or $0.76 per share (basic and diluted) for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of $887,000 or 38.9%. The increase is due primarily to an increase in net interest income of $2.5 million or 25.4% and an increase in noninterest income of $140,000 or 3.9% offset by an increase in noninterest expense of $930,000 or 9.5%, an increase in provision for loan losses of $354,000 or 52.0%, and an increase in provision for income tax expense of $466,000 or 71.5%. These increases are due in part to the growth in loans, in deposits, and in Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances. Net earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2002 were $1.1 million or $0.36 per share (basic and diluted) compared with $819,000 or $0.27 per share for the three months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of $273,000 or 33.3%. The increase is primarily due to an increase in net interest income partly offset by an increase in noninterest expense primarily due to additional employee compensation and benefits costs.
The first nine months of 2002 showed steady growth. Gross loans increased to $351.4 million at September 30, 2002, from $331.3 million at December 31, 2001, an increase of $20.1 million or 6.1%. Total assets increased to $515.8 million at September 30, 2002, compared with $460.5 million at December 31, 2001. The increase of $55.3 million or 12.0% in total assets resulted primarily from the investment of increased deposits of $32.6 million, and an increase in FHLB advances of $19.8 million. Total deposits increased to $415.9 million at September 30, 2002 compared to $383.3 million at December 31, 2001, an increase of $32.6 million or 8.5%. Total FHLB advances increased from $33.1 million to $52.9 million to help fund the growth in loans.
Total shareholders’ equity was $35.0 million at September 30, 2002, representing an increase of $3.2 million or 9.9% from December 31, 2001. This increase is due to earnings for the period of $3.2 million and an increase in accumulated other comprehensive income of $551,000 and the issuance of 2,000 shares exercised under the Company’s stock option plan for $19,000 offset by the purchase of 10,000 shares of treasury stock at a cost of $130,000, and the payment of dividends of $450,000.
Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $21.6 million, a decrease of $1.0 million or 4.4% compared with the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Despite the increase in average interest-earning assets, interest income decreased primarily due to lower rates earned on earnings assets as a result of the falling interest rate environment. The average interest rate earned on interest-earnings assets decreased from, 7.90% during the nine months ended September 30, 2001 to 6.58% during the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Average loans were $338.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared with $296.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of $42.4 million or 14.3%. Average securities were $87.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared with $71.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of $16.4 million or 23.0%. Interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2002 was $7.4 million, a decrease of $165,000 or 2.2% compared with the three months ended September 30, 2001. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets from 7.66% during the three months ended September 30, 2001 to 6.43% during the three months ended September 30, 2002, partly offset by a $64.3 million increase in average interest earning assets.
12
Interest expense on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities was $9.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared with $12.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, a decrease of $3.5 million or 27.3%. The decrease in interest expense is due primarily to a decrease in average interest rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities from 5.10% for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 to 3.26% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The decrease is partially offset by a $46.3 million or 13.8% increase in average interest-bearing liabilities to $381.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, from $335.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Interest expense was $3.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared with $4.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001, a decrease of $963,000 or 23.9%. The decrease in interest expense for the comparable three month periods is also due to decreases in average interest rates of interest-bearing liabilities partly offset by a $55.1 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities.
Net interest income was $12.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared with $9.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of $2.5 million or 25.5%. The increase in net interest income resulted primarily from growth in average interest-earnings assets to $439.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, from $383.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 20001 an increase of $56.4 million or 14.7%, offset by growth in average interest-bearing liabilities to $381.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, from $335.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of $46.3 million, or 13.8%. Net interest income was $4.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2002, compared with $3.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of $798,000 or 22.8%. The net interest margin increased from 3.56% to 3.75% for the three months ended September 30, 2002 and increased from 3.43% to 3.75% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to the same three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2001. The increase for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 can be attributed to the fact that the percentage growth in average interest-earning assets exceeded the percentage growth in average interest-bearing liabilities causing the ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities to increase.
The Company’s net interest income is affected by changes in the amount and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, referred to as a “volume change.” It is also affected by changes in yields earned on interest-earning assets and rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowed funds, referred to as a “rate change.” The following tables set forth, for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the average amounts outstanding, the interest earned or paid on such amounts, and the average rate earned or paid for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The tables also set forth the average rate earned on total interest-earning assets, the average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities, the net interest spread and the net interest margin for the same periods. The net interest spread is the difference between the average rate earned on total interest-earning assets less the average rate paid on total interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
13
14
15
The following tables present the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for the major components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and distinguishes between the increase (decrease) related to outstanding balances and the volatility of interest rates. For purposes of these tables, changes attributable to both rate and volume that can be segregated have been allocated (dollars in thousands):
16
Provisions for loan losses are charged to income to bring the total allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management of the Company based on such factors as the industry diversification of the Company’s commercial loan portfolio, the effect of changes in the local real estate market on collateral values, the results of recent regulatory examinations, the effects on the loan portfolio of current economic indicators and their probable impact on borrowers, the amount of charge-offs for the period, the amount of nonperforming loans and related collateral security, the evaluation of the Company’s loan portfolio by an external loan review firm. The provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, was $1.0 million compared to $681,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of $354,000 or 52.0%. The provision for loan losses for the three months ended September 30, 2002, was $335,000 compared to $341,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001, a decrease of $6,000 or 1.8%. The increase for the nine-months ended September 30, 2002 was due to the increase in average loans of $42.4 million, or 14.3% over the comparable nine-month period ended September 30, 2001. Management believes increasing the allowance for loan losses is prudent as total loans, particularly higher-risk commercial, construction, and consumer loans, increase. The increase is also due to the unstable economic conditions.
17
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest income (dollars in thousands):
As the table above indicates, the Company’s primary sources of recurring noninterest income are service charges on deposit accounts and fee income. The increase in noninterest income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2002 was primarily due to an increase in service charges on deposit accounts created by an increase in the number of deposit accounts and increases in fee income due to increases in check cashing fee income and debit card fee income.
The decrease in other noninterest income for the three month period is due primarily to more gain on sale of other real estate and mortgage loans recorded in 2001 over and above that which was recorded in 2002. The decrease in the nine-month period is due primarily to a decline in income recorded from Guaranty Leasing Company of $132,000
18
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the major categories of noninterest expenses (dollars in thousands):
The increase in employee compensation and benefits for both the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2002 is due primarily to normal salary increases and additional staff placement in the Mt. Pleasant, Texarkana, and Paris locations to handle customer growth. The number of full-time equivalent employees was 208 at September 30, 2002, compared with 197 at September 30, 2001.
Other non-staff expenses increased $193,000, or 36.1% and $253,000, or 14.5%, over the comparable three and nine month periods. Increases in other non-staff expenses were partially the result of increases in software support fees, ATM and debit card expenses.
Income tax expense increased $466,000 or 71.5% to $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 from $652,000 for the same period in 2001. Income tax expense was $413,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2002 compared with $239,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2001, an increase of $174,000 or 72.8%. The increase for the three and nine-month periods was primarily attributable to the increase in income before income taxes and also the result of fewer tax deductions available from the Company’s leveraged leasing activities. The income stated on the consolidated statement of earnings differ from the taxable income due to tax-exempt income, the amount of non-deductible interest expense and the amount of other non-deductible expense.
Gross loans were $351.4 million at September 30, 2002, an increase of $20.1 million or 6.1% from $331.3 million at December 31, 2001. Loan growth occurred primarily in 1-4 family residential loans and in the construction and land development loans due to continued good loan demand in the various markets that the Company serves.
19
The following table summarizes the loan portfolio of the Company by type of loans as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001 (dollars in thousands):
In originating loans, the Company recognizes that it will experience credit losses and the risk of loss will vary with, among other things, general economic conditions, the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan and, in the case of a collateralized loan, the quality of the collateral for such loan. The Company maintains an allowance for loan losses in an amount that it believes is adequate for estimated losses in its loan portfolio. Management determines the adequacy of the allowance through its evaluation of the loan portfolio. In addition to unallocated allowances, specific allowances are provided for individual loans when ultimate collection is considered questionable by management after reviewing the current status of loans which are contractually past due and considering the net realizable value of the collateral for the loan. Loans are charged-off against the allowance for loan losses when appropriate. Although management believes it uses the best information available to make determinations with respect to the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments may be necessary if economic conditions differ from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. Loans charged-off, net of recoveries, during the nine month period ended September 30, 2002 increased $286,000 or 61.8% over the same period ended September 30, 2001. This increase is due primarily to additional charge-offs recognized during the period caused by the Company’s aggressive position on identifying problem assets. At September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001, the allowance for loan losses totaled $3.6 million or 1.03% of gross loans and $2.8 million or 0.88% of gross loans respectively. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 102.66% at September 30, 2002.
20
Set forth below is an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
Nonperforming assets were $4.4 million at September 30, 2002 compared with $6.2 million at December 31, 2001. Nonaccrual loans decreased $544,000 from $3.7 million at December 31, 2001 to $3.2 million at September 30, 2002. This decrease is due primarily to three large commercial lines paid and taken off of non-accrual status totaling $1.9 million offset by the addition of a number of smaller credits added to nonaccrual status totaling approximately $1.4 million. These new lines are currently in a liquidation mode. They have collateral values, which exceed the total debt, and no loss is anticipated. Accruing loans 90 or more days past due decreased $1.6 million, from $1.9 million at December 31, 2001 to $345,000 at September 30, 2002. This decrease is due primarily to collection efforts of previously past due credits. Other real estate increased $326,000 during the same comparative dates. The increase is primarily the result of loans that were foreclosed on during the period totaling $3.2 million, net of sales of properties with a carrying value of $2.9 million. Management anticipates minimal losses on the total of these new nonperforming assets. The Company had no restructured loans at September 30, 2002 or at December 31, 2001.
The ratio of nonperforming assets to total loans and other real estate was 1.26% and 1.87% at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively.
The following table presents information regarding nonperforming assets as of the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
21
Securities totaled $96.9 million at September 30, 2002, an increase of $15.2 million or 18.7% from $81.7 million at December 31, 2001. At September 30, 2002, securities represented 18.8% of total assets compared with 17.7% of total assets at December 31, 2001. The average yield on securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, was 5.37% compared with 6.53% for the same period in 2001. At September 30, 2002, securities included $9.9 million in U.S. Government securities, $60.6 million in mortgage-backed securities, $22.0 million in collateralized mortgage obligations, $3.1 million in equity securities, and $1.3 million in municipal securities. The average life of the securities portfolio at September 30, 2002, is approximately 2.8 years, however, all of the Company’s securities are classified as available-for-sale.
Other assets totaled $9.0 million at September 30, 2002 compared to $11.4 million at December 31, 2001, a decrease of $2.4 million or 21.0%. This decrease resulted primarily from the collection of a receivable of $3.0 million as of December 31, 2001 reflecting the settlement of the Company’s lawsuit against another financial institution.
At September 30, 2002, demand, money market and savings deposits account for approximately 42.5% of total deposits, while certificates of deposit made up 57.5% of total deposits. Total deposits increased $32.6 million or 8.5% from December 31, 2001 to September 30, 2002. This increase comes primarily from an increase in certificate of deposits of $25.8 million or 12.1% and an increase in interest-bearing demand deposits of $3.6 million or 10.8%. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits totaled $66.6 million or 16.0% of total deposits at September 30, 2002, compared with $63.7 million or 16.6% of total deposits at December 31, 2001. The average cost of deposits, including noninterest-bearing demand deposits, was 2.54% for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared with 4.23% for the same period in 2001.
The Company’s asset/liability management policy is intended to maintain adequate liquidity for the Company. Liquidity involves the Company’s ability to raise funds to support asset growth or reduce assets to meet deposit withdrawals and other payment obligations, to maintain reserve requirements and otherwise to operate the Company on a continuing basis. The Company’s liquidity needs are primarily met by growth in core deposits. Although access to purchased funds from correspondent banks is available and has been utilized on occasion to take advantage of investment opportunities, the Company does not continually rely on these external-funding sources. The cash and federal funds sold position, supplemented by amortizing investments along with payments and maturities within the loan portfolio, has historically created an adequate liquidity position.
The Company’s cash flows are composed of three classifications: cash flows from operating activities, cash flows from investing activities, and cash flows from financing activities. As summarized in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, the most significant transactions which affected the Company’s level of cash and cash equivalents, cash flows, and liquidity during the first nine months of 2002 are the securities purchases of $64.8 million, the net increase in deposits of $32.6 million, securities sales of $28.0 million, the net increase in loans of $24.1 million, securities calls, maturities, and principals repayments of $23.4 million, the net increase in federal funds sold of $21.3 million, and the net increase in FHLB advances of $20.0 million.
22
Both the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”), with respect to the Company, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC), with respect to the Bank, have established certain minimum risk-based capital standards that apply to bank holding companies and federally insured banks, respectively. As of September 30, 2002, the Company’s Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital and leverage capital ratios are 11.62%, 12.69%, and 8.22%, respectively. As of September 30, 2002, the Bank’s risk-based capital ratios remain above the levels required for the Bank to be designated as “well capitalized” by the FDIC with Tier 1 risk-based capital, total risk-based capital and leverage capital ratios of 11.02%, 12.07%, and 7.92%, respectively. Management is not aware of any conditions or events subsequent to September 30, 2002 that would change the Company’s or the Bank’s capital category.
As discussed in Note 2 — Recent Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this report, the Company implemented new accounting standards related to accounting for goodwill and intangible assets beginning January 1, 2002. Also refer to this note for a summary of new accounting standards issued during the nine months ended September 30, 2002.
There have been no material changes in the market risk information disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. See Form 10-K, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
The Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)) as of a date (the “Evaluation Date”) within 90 days before the filing date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities.
(b) Changes in internal controls
There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or, to the knowledge of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, in other factors that could significantly affect the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures subsequent to the Evaluation Date.
23
None
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q:
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
24
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
25
I, Arthur B. Scharlach, Jr. certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Guaranty Bancshares, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
26
I, Clifton A. Payne certify that:
27
28