UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
For The Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2013
OR
Commission File Number: 814-00702
HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH
CAPITAL, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(State or Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
400 Hamilton Ave., Suite 310
Palo Alto, California
(650) 289-3060
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this Chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
On July 30, 2013, there were 61,631,201 shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value.
HERCULES TECHNOLOGY GROWTH CAPITAL, INC.
FORM 10-Q TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited)
Consolidated Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2012
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5.
Other Information
Item 6.
Exhibits
SIGNATURES
2
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
In this Quarterly Report, the “Company,” “Hercules,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries and its affiliated securitization trusts unless the context otherwise requires.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
(unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Assets
Investments:
Non-control/Non-affiliate investments (cost of $1,032,780 and $896,031, respectively)
Affiliate investments (cost of $17,222 and $18,307, respectively)
Total investments, at value (cost of $1,050,002 and $914,338, respectively)
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted Cash
Interest receivable
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
Long-term Liabilities (Convertible Senior Note)
Asset-Backed Notes
2019 Notes
Long-term SBA Debentures
Total liabilities
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9)
Net assets consist of:
Common stock, par value
Capital in excess of par value
Unrealized depreciation on investments and other assets
Accumulated realized losses on investments
Distributions in excess of investment income
Total net assets
Total liabilities and net assets
Shares of common stock outstanding ($0.001 par value, 100,000,000 authorized)
Net asset value per share
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
The following table presents the assets and liabilities of our consolidated variable interest entity (“VIE”). The assets of the VIE can only be used to settle obligations of the consolidated VIE, and the creditors (or beneficial interest holders) do not have recourse to our general credit. These assets and liabilities are included in the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities above.
(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Total investments, at value (cost of $206,594 and $0, respectively)
LIABILITIES
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
Investment income:
Interest Income
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate investments
Affiliate investments
Total interest income
Fees
Control investments
Total fees
Total investment income
Operating expenses:
Interest
Loan fees
General and administrative
Employee Compensation:
Compensation and benefits
Stock-based compensation
Total employee compensation
Total operating expenses
Net investment income
Net realized gain on investments
Total net realized gain on investments
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and other assets
Total net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and other assets
Total net realized (unrealized) gain (loss)
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
Net investment income before investment gains and losses per common share:
Basic
Change in net assets per common share:
Diluted
Weighted average shares outstanding
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(dollars and shares in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2011
Issuance of common stock
Issuance of common stock under restricted stock plan
Issuance of common stock as stock dividend
Retired shares from net issuance
Public Offering
Dividends declared
Balance at June 30, 2012
Balance at December 31, 2012
Balance at June 30, 2013
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash used in operating activities:
Purchase of investments
Principal payments received on investments
Proceeds from sale of investments
Net unrealized (appreciation) / depreciation on investments and other assets
Accretion of paid-in-kind principal
Accretion of loan discounts
Accretion of loan discount on Convertible Senior Notes
Accretion of loan exit fees
Change in deferred loan origination revenue
Unearned fees related to unfunded commitments
Amortization of debt fees and issuance costs
Depreciation
Stock-based compensation and amortization of restricted stock grants
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses and other assets
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Net cash used in operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of capital equipment
Investment in restricted cash
Other long-term assets
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net
Dividends paid
Issuance of 2019 Notes
Borrowings of credit facilities
Repayments of credit facilities
Cash paid for debt issuance costs
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
7
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2013
Portfolio Company
Sub-Industry
Type of Investment(1)
Maturity: Upon Liqudation
Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(9)
Matures upon liqudation
Interest rate Fixed 10.00%
No intial interest rate
Total Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Maturity: Under 1 Year Maturity
Chroma Therapeutics, Ltd.(5)(10)
Matures November 2013
Interest rate Prime + 7.75% or
Floor rate of 12.00%
Maturity: 1-5 Years Maturity
ADMA Biologics, Inc.
Matures April 2016
Interest rate Prime + 2.75% or
Floor rate of 8.50%
Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3)
Matures July 2017
Interest rate Prime + 6.40% or
Floor rate of 11.65%
Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3)(11)
Matures September 2015
Interest rate Prime + 7.15% or
Floor rate of 11.90%
Cell Therapeutics, Inc.(3)
Matures October 2016
Interest rate Prime + 9.00% or
Floor rate of 12.25%
Cempra, Inc.(3)
Matures June 2017
Interest rate Prime + 6.30% or
Floor rate of 9.55%
Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Matures October 2015
Interest rate Prime + 3.25% or
Coronado BioSciences, Inc.(3)
Matures March 2016
Interest rate Prime + 6.00% or
Floor rate of 9.25%
Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Matures January 2015
Interest rate Prime + 4.40% or
Floor rate of 10.15%
Insmed, Inc.
Matures January 2016
Interest rate Prime + 4.75% or
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3)
Matures May 2016
Interest rate Prime + 5.30% or
Floor rate of 10.55%
Neuralstem, Inc.(3)
Matures June 2016
Floor rate of 11.00%
NeurogesX, Inc.
Matures February 2015
Interest rate Prime + 7.50% or
Floor rate of 10.75%
8
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS—(Continued)
UniQure Biopharma B.V.(5)(10)
Interest rate Prime + 8.60% or
Floor rate of 11.85%
Total Debt Drug Discovery & Development (32.96%)*
Bridgewave Communications
Interest rate Prime + 8.00% or
PIK Interest 8.00%
OpenPeak, Inc.
Matures July 2015
Interest rate Prime + 8.75% or
Spring Mobile Solutions, Inc.
Matures November 2016
Floor rate of 11.25%
Deferred Interest 2.50%
UPH Holdings, Inc.(8)
Matures April 2015
Interest rate Libor + 11.00% or
Floor rate of 13.50%
Matures January 2017
Total UPH Holdings, Inc.
Total Debt Communications & Networking (6.77%)*
Clustrix, Inc.
Matures December 2015
Interest rate Prime + 6.50% or
Floor rate of 9.75%
Identive Group, Inc. (3)
Matures November 2015
Floor rate 11.00%
9
OCZ Technology Group, Inc.(3)
Floor rate of 12.50%,
PIK Interest 3.00%
Plures Technologies, Inc.(3)
Interest rate Prime + 12.75% or
Floor rate of 16.00%,
PIK Interest 4.00%
Total Debt Electronics & Computer Hardware (3.06%)
Maturity: Upon Liquidation
Interest rate Fixed 8.00%
Interest rate Prime + 3.75% or
Floor rate of 7.50%
Matures July 2014
Interest rate Prime + 5.25% or
Matures July 2016
Interest rate Prime + 5.13% or
Floor rate of 8.88%
Total Box, Inc.
Interest rate Prime + 8.25% or
Floor rate of 11.50%
Matures August 2015
Interest rate Prime + 7.35% or
Floor rate 10.6%
Interest rate Prime + 7.25% or
Floor rate of 10.50%
Interest rate Prime + 5.08% or
Floor rate of 8.33%
Matures December 2016
10
Neos Geosolutions, Inc.
Interest rate Prime + 5.75% or
Floor rate of 9.50%
StartApp, Inc.
Matures March 2017
TouchCommerce, Inc.
Floor rate of 10.25%
Total TouchCommerce, Inc.
Matures December 2014
Interest rate Prime + 2.25% or
Floor rate of 6.50%
Total Debt Software (10.30%)*
Quatrx Pharmaceuticals Company(9)
Matures March 2014
Rockwell Medical, Inc.
Interest rate Prime + 9.25% or
Floor rate of 12.50%
Total Debt Specialty Pharmaceuticals 3.67%)*
Achronix Semiconductor Corporation
Interest rate Prime + 10.60% or
Floor rate of 13.85%
Total Debt Semiconductors (0.22%)*
Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3)
Matures October 2013
AcelRX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3)
BIND Biosciences, Inc.
Matures September 2016
Interest rate Prime + 7.00% or
11
Intelliject, Inc.
Nupathe, Inc.(3)
Interest rate Prime - 3.25% or
Floor rate of 9.85%
Revance Therapeutics, Inc.
Matures March 2015
Interest rate Prime + 6.60% or
Total Debt Drug Delivery (9.20%)*
Loku, Inc.(9)
Matures June 2013
Interest rate Fixed 6.00%
Tectura Corporation
Matures July 2013
Interest rate LIBOR + 10.75% or
Floor rate of 14.00%
PIK Interest 4.50%
Interest rate LIBOR + 10.00% or
Floor rate of 13.00%
Total Tectura Corporation
Ahhha, Inc.(8)
Interest rate Fixed 12.00%
Blurb, Inc.
Floor rate 8.50%
CashStar, Inc.
Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or Floor
rate 10.50%, PIK Interest 1.00%
Education Dynamics, LLC
Interest rate Fixed 12.50%, PIK
Interest 1.50%
Just.Me, Inc.
Matures June 2015
Interest rate Prime + 2.50% or
Floor rate 5.75%
Interest rate Prime + 5.00% or
Floor rate 8.25%
Total Just.Me, Inc.
NetPlenish, Inc.
Progress Financial Corporation
Interest rate Prime + 6.75% or
Floor rate 12.00%
Reply! Inc.
Interest rate Prime + 6.875% or
Floor rate of 10.125%
PIK Interest 2.00%
12
Matures February 2016
Total Reply! Inc.
Second Rotation, Inc.
Floor rate of 10.25% , PIK
Interest 2.50%
Matures October 2014
Total Second Rotation, Inc.
ShareThis, Inc.
Trulia, Inc.(3)
Floor rate of 6.00%
Interest rate Prime + 5.50% or
Floor rate of 8.75%
Total Trulia, Inc.
13
Vaultlogix, Inc.
Interest rate LIBOR + 8.50% or
Floor rate of 10.00%,
PIK interest 2.50%
Interest rate LIBOR + 7.00% or
Total Vaultlogix, Inc.
Wavemarket, Inc.
Total Debt Internet Consumer & Business Services (23.85%)*
InXpo, Inc.
Cha Cha Search, Inc.
Interest rate Prime + 6.25% or
Eccentex Corporation
Matures May 2015
Jab Wireless, Inc.
Matures November 2017
Floor rate of 8.00%
Total Jab Wireless, Inc.
Womensforum.com, Inc.
Interest rate LIBOR + 6.50% or
Interest rate LIBOR + 7.50% or
Total Womensforum.com, Inc.
Total Debt Information Services (7.69%)*
Novasys Medical, Inc.(9)
Optiscan Biomedical, Corp.(6)
Matures December 2013
Interest rate Prime + 8.20% or
Floor rate of 11.45%
Oraya Therapeutics, Inc.(9)
Interest rate Fixed 7.00%
Lanx, Inc.
Floor rate of 11.75%
Revolving Line of Credit
Floor rate of 9.00%
Total Lanx, Inc.
14
Medrobotics Corporation
Interest rate Prime + 7.85% or
Floor rate of 11.10%
MELA Sciences, Inc.(3)
Interest rate Prime + 7.20% or
Floor rate of 10.45%
NinePoint Medical, Inc.
Interest rate Prime + 5.85% or
Floor rate of 9.10%
Oraya Therapeutics, Inc.
United Orthopedic Group, Inc.
SonaCare Medical, LLC
Total Debt Medical Device & Equipment (14.39%)*
Tethys Bioscience Inc.
Interest rate Prime + 8.40% or
Total Debt Diagnostic (1.63%)*
Labcyte, Inc.
Interest rate Prime + 6.70% or
Floor rate of 9.95%
Total Debt Biotechnology Tools (0.79%)*
15
MDeverywhere, Inc.
Interest rate LIBOR + 9.50% or
MedCall, LLC
Interest rate 7.79% or
Interest rate LIBOR +8.00% or
Floor rate of 10.00%
Total MedCall, LLC
Orion HealthCorp, Inc.
Interest rate LIBOR + 10.50% or
Interest rate LIBOR + 8.25% or
Total Orion HealthCorp, Inc.
Pacific Child & Family Associates, LLC
Interest rate LIBOR + 9.00% or
Interest rate LIBOR + 11.00% or
Floor rate of 14.00%,
PIK interest 3.75%
Total Pacific Child & Family Associates, LLC
ScriptSave (Medical Security Card Company, LLC)
Interest rate LIBOR + 8.75% or
Total Debt Health Services, Other (7.64%)*
Entrigue Surgical, Inc.
Interest rate Prime + 5.90% or
Floor rate of 9.65%
Transmedics, Inc.
Interest rate Fixed 12.95%
Total Debt Surgical Devices (1.46%)*
16
Westwood One Communications
Zoom Media Corporation
Floor rate of 10.50%, PIK 3.75%
Total Zoom Media Corporation
Total Debt Media/Content/Info (4.06%)*
BrightSource Energy, Inc.
Matures January 2014
Agrivida, Inc.
Alphabet Energy, Inc.
American Supercondutor Corporation(3)
Bioamber, Inc.(5)(10)
Enphase Energy, Inc.
Matures June 2014
Matures August 2016
Total Enphase Energy, Inc.
Fulcrum Bioenergy, Inc.
Glori Energy, Inc.
17
Scifiniti (fka Integrated Photovoltaics, Inc.)
Interest rate Prime + 7.38% or
Floor rate of 10.63%
Polyera Corporation
Redwood Systems, Inc.
SCIenergy, Inc.
Stion Corporation
TAS Energy, Inc.
Total TAS Energy, Inc.
TPI Composites, Inc.
Total Debt Clean Tech (25.03%)*
Total Debt (152.72%)
18
Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Total Warrants Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc.(3)
Coronado Biosciences, Inc.(3)
Total Warrants Dicerna Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Horizon Pharma, Inc.(3)
Omthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3)
Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3)
Total Warrants Drug Discovery & Development (0.90%)*
Intelepeer, Inc.
Neonova Holding Company
PeerApp, Inc.
Peerless Network, Inc.
Ping Identity Corporation
Purcell Systems, Inc.
Stoke, Inc.
Total Stoke, Inc.
Total Warrants Communications & Networking (0.24%)*
19
Series
Atrenta, Inc.
Box, Inc.
Braxton Technologies, LLC.
Central Desktop, Inc.
Clickfox, Inc.
Total Clickfox, Inc.
Daegis Inc. (pka Unify Corporation)(3)
Endplay, Inc.
Forescout Technologies, Inc.
Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc.
JackBe Corporation
Kxen, Inc.
Mobile Posse, Inc.
Rockyou, Inc.
SugarSync Inc.
Total SugarSync Inc.
Tada Innovations, Inc.
White Sky, Inc.
WildTangent, Inc.
Total Warrants Software (1.42%)*
Total Warrant Electronics & Computer Hardware (0.18%)*
Quatrx Pharmaceuticals Company
Total Warrants Specialty Pharmaceuticals (0.00%)*
20
IPA Holdings, LLC
Market Force Information, Inc.
Seven Networks, Inc.
Total Warrant Consumer & Business Products (0.18%)*
iWatt, Inc.
Total iWatt, Inc.
Kovio Inc.
Total Warrants Semiconductors (0.41%)*
Total BIND Biosciences, Inc.
NuPathe, Inc.(3)
Transcept Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3)
Total Warrant Drug Delivery (0.46%)*
Total Blurb, Inc.
Invoke Solutions, Inc.
Just.Me
Prism Education Group, Inc.
Total Warrants Internet Consumer & Business Services (0.23%)*
21
Buzznet, Inc.
Intelligent Beauty, Inc.
Total InXpo, Inc.
RichRelevance, Inc.
Solutionary, Inc.
Total Warrants Information Services (0.26%)*
Gelesis, Inc.(6)
Novasys Medical, Inc.
Total Novasys Medial, Inc.
Total Oraya Therapeutics, Inc.
Total Warrants Medical Device & Equipment (0.54%)*
Navidea Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (pka Neoprobe)(3)
Tethys Bioscience, Inc.
Total Warrants Diagnostic (0.06%)*
NuGEN Technologies, Inc.
Total NuGEN Technologies, Inc.
Total Warrants Biotechnology Tools (0.06%)*
22
Total Transmedics, Inc.
Gynesonics, Inc.
Total Warrants Surgical Devices (0.16%)*
Everyday Health, Inc. (pka Waterfront Media, Inc.)
Glam Media, Inc.
Zoom Media Group, Inc.
Total Warrants Media/Content/Info (0.08%)*
Total Warrants Healthcare Services (0.01%)*
Total BrightSource Energy, Inc.
Calera, Inc.
EcoMotors, Inc.
GreatPoint Energy, Inc.
Propel Biofuels, Inc.
Solexel, Inc.
Trilliant, Inc.
Total Warrants Clean Tech (0.48%)*
Total Warrants (5.67%)
23
Total Acceleron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Aveo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3)
Inotek Pharmaceuticals Corp.
Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Total Equity Drug Discovery & Development (0.98%)*
Merrion Pharma, Plc.(3)
Total Equity Drug Delivery (0.15%)*
Philotic, Inc.
Total Equity Internet Consumers & Business Services (0.15%)*
Glowpoint, Inc.(3)
Total Equity Communications & Networking (0.66%)*
Total Atrenta, Inc.
Caplinked, Inc.
Highroads, Inc.
Total Equity Software (2.58%)*
Virident Systems
Total Equity Electronics & Computer Hardware (0.80%)*
24
Total Equity Specialty Pharmaceuticals (0.00%)*
Caivis Acquisition Corporation
Facebook, Inc.(3)
Total Equity Consumer & Business Products (1.53%)*
Total Equity Semiconductors (0.47%)*
Good Technologies, Inc. (pka Visto Corporation)
Total Solutionary, Inc.
Total Equity Information Services (0.08%)*
Total Gelesis, Inc.
Total Optiscan Biomedical, Corp.
Total Equity Medical Device & Equipment (0.99%)*
Total Equity Biotechnology Tools (0.13%)*
Total Gynesonics, Inc.
Total Equity Surgical Devices (0.32%)*
Total Equity Media/Content/Info (0.20%)*
Total Equity (9.04%)
Total Investments (167.43%)
25
December 31, 2012
Interest rate Prime + 7.30% or
Concert Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(4)
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
NeurogesX, Inc.(3)
Matures upon liquidation
Total Debt Drug Discovery & Development (34.63%)*
26
PeerApp, Inc.(4)
Matures April 2013
UPH Holdings, Inc.
Total Debt Communications & Networking (6.04%)*
Identive Group, Inc.
Total Debt Electronics & Computer Hardware (1.49%)
Box, Inc.(4)
Senior Debt
27
EndPlay,Inc.
Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc
Kxen, Inc.(4)
Matures November 2012
Total Debt Software (9.33%)*
Althea Technologies, Inc.
Interest rate Prime + 7.70% or
Floor rate of 10.95%
Total Debt Specialty Pharmaceuticals (2.00%)*
Total Debt Semiconductors (0.34%)*
Interest rate Prime + 7.45% or
Floor rate of 10.70%
28
Total Debt Drug Delivery (13.59%)*
Matures March 2016 Interest rate Fixed 12.50%, PIK Interest
1.50%
Loku, Inc.
Floor rate of 10.25% , PIK Interest 2.50%
29
Floor rate of 10.25% , PIK Interest 1.50%
Matures January 2013 Interest rate Fixed 10.50%, PIK Interest 0.25%
Interest rate Libor + 8.00% or
Interest rate Libor + 10.00% or
Floor rate of 10.00%, PIK interest 2.50%
Votizen, Inc.
Matures February 2013
Interest rate Fixed 5.00%
Total Debt Internet Consumer & Business Services (26.02%)*
30
Total Debt Information Services (10.10%)*
Matures September 2013
Matures January 2013
Matures August 2013
Total Novasys Medical, Inc.
31
USHIFU, LLC
Total Debt Medical Device & Equipment (9.69%)*
Total Debt Diagnostic (3.06%)*
Matures May 2013
Total Labcyte, Inc.
Total Debt Biotechnology Tools (1.13%)*
32
Interest rate LIBOR + 11.50% or
Floor rate of 14.00%, PIK interest 3.75%
Total Debt Health Services, Other (7.07%)*
Total Debt Surgical Devices (1.92%)*
Women’s Marketing, Inc.
Interest rate Libor + 9.50% or
Floor rate of 12.00%, PIK interest 3.00%
Interest rate Libor + 7.50% or
Total Women’s Marketing, Inc.
Total Debt Media/Content/Info (9.83%)*
33
Comverge, Inc.
Interest rate LIBOR + 8.00% or
Total Comverge, Inc.
Enphase Energy, Inc.(3)
Integrated Photovoltaics, Inc.
SCIenergy, Inc.(4)
Total Solexel, Inc.
Stion Corporation(4)
Total Debt Clean Tech (24.14%)*
Total Debt (160.38%)
34
EpiCept Corporation(3)
Insmed, Incorporated(3)
PolyMedix, Inc.(3)
Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Total Warrants Drug Discovery & Development (0.84%)*
Total Warrants Communications & Networking (0.20%)*
35
HighRoads, Inc.
Total Warrants Software (1.51%)*
Luminus Devices, Inc.
Shocking Technologies, Inc.
Total Warrant Electronics & Computer Hardware (0.02%)*
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(3)
Total Warrants Specialty Pharmaceuticals (0.42%)*
Wageworks, Inc.(3)
Total Warrant Consumer & Business Products (0.64%)*
Enpirion, Inc.
Quartics, Inc.
Total Warrants Semiconductors (0.08%)*
36
Second Rotation
Total Warrants Internet Consumer & Business Services (0.37%)*
Total Warrants Information Services (0.22%)*
EKOS Corporation
Total Warrants Medical Device & Equipment (0.24%)*
37
Total Warrants Diagnostic (0.10%)*
Total Warrants Biotechnology Tools (0.08%)*
Total Warrants Surgical Devices (0.08%)*
Total Warrants Clean Tech (0.39%)*
Total Warrants (5.73%)
Total Equity Drug Discovery & Development (1.06%)*
38
Merrion Pharma, Plc.(3)(5)(10)
Nupathe, Inc.
Total Equity Drug Delivery (0.33%)*
E-band Communications, Corp.(6)
Total E-band Communications, Corp.
Total Equity Communications & Networking (1.04%)*
Total Equity Software (2.89%)*
Spatial Photonics, Inc.
Total Equity Electronics & Computer Hardware (0.95%)*
Quatrx PharmaceuticalsCompany
Total Equity Consumer & Business Products (2.02%)*
Total Equity Semiconductors (0.15%)*
39
Good Technologies, Inc.(pka Visto Corporation)
Total Equity Information Services (0.06%)*
Total Equity Medical Device & Equipment (0.64%)*
Total Equity Biotechnology Tools (0.12%)*
Total Equity Surgical Devices (0.20%)*
Total Equity Media/Content/Info (0.08%)*
Total Equity (9.54%)
Total Investments (175.65%)
40
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Description of Business and Unaudited Interim Consolidated Financial Statements Basis of Presentation
Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) is a specialty finance company focused on providing senior secured loans to venture capital-backed companies in technology-related markets, including technology, biotechnology, life science, and clean-technology industries at all stages of development. The Company sources its investments through its principal office located in Silicon Valley, as well as through its additional offices in Boston, MA, New York, NY, Chicago, IL, Boulder, CO and McLean, VA. The Company was incorporated under the General Corporation Law of the State of Maryland in December 2003.
The Company is an internally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). From incorporation through December 31, 2005, the Company was taxed as a corporation under Subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, (the “Code”). Effective January 1, 2006, the Company has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under the Code (see Note 5).
Hercules Technology II, L.P. (“HT II”), Hercules Technology III, L.P. (“HT III”), and Hercules Technology IV, L.P. (“HT IV”), are Delaware limited partnerships that were formed in January 2005, September 2009 and December 2010, respectively. HT II and HT III were licensed to operate as small business investment companies (“SBICs”), under the authority of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), on September 27, 2006 and May 26, 2010, respectively. As SBICs, HT II and HT III are subject to a variety of regulations concerning, among other things, the size and nature of the companies in which they may invest and the structure of those investments. The Company also formed Hercules Technology SBIC Management, LLC, or (“HTM”), a limited liability company in November 2003. HTM is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and serves as the limited partner and general partner of HT II and HT III (see Note 4).
HT II and HT III hold approximately $156.8 million and $265.3 million in assets, respectively, and accounted for approximately 10.1% and 17.0% of our total assets prior to consolidation at June 30, 2013.
The Company also established wholly owned subsidiaries, all of which are structured as Delaware corporations and limited liability companies, to hold portfolio companies organized as limited liability companies, or LLCs (or other forms of pass-through entities). The Company currently qualifies as a RIC for federal income tax purposes, which allows the Company to avoid paying corporate income taxes on any income or gains that the Company distributes to our stockholders. The purpose of establishing these entities is to satisfy the RIC tax requirement that at least 90% of the Company’s gross income for income tax purposes is investment income.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In accordance with Article 6 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Company does not consolidate portfolio company investments. The accompanying consolidated interim financial statements are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP are omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting solely of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for the fair presentation of consolidated financial statements for the interim periods have been included. The current period’s results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results that ultimately may be achieved for the year. Therefore, the interim unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the period ended December 31, 2012. The year-end consolidated statement of assets and liabilities data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. Financial statements prepared on a U.S. GAAP basis require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts and disclosures reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions could change in the future as more information becomes known, which could impact the amounts reported and disclosed herein.
41
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries and all variable interest entities of which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
A VIE is an entity that either (i) has insufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (ii) has equity investors who lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the party with both the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb the losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE.
To assess whether the Company has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance, the Company considers all the facts and circumstances including its role in establishing the VIE and its ongoing rights and responsibilities. This assessment includes identifying the activities that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and identifying which party, if any, has power over those activities. In general, the party that makes the most significant decisions affecting the VIE is determined to have the power to direct the activities of a VIE. To assess whether the Company has the obligation to absorb the losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE, the Company considers all of its economic interests, including debt and equity interests, servicing rights and fee arrangements, and any other variable interests in the VIE. If the Company determines that it is the party with the power to make the most significant decisions affecting the VIE, and the Company has a potentially significant interest in the VIE, then it consolidates the VIE.
The Company performs ongoing reassessments, usually quarterly, of whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The reassessment process considers whether the Company has acquired or divested the power to direct the activities of the VIE through changes in governing documents or other circumstances. The Company also reconsiders whether entities previously determined not to be VIEs have become VIEs, based on certain events, and therefore are subject to the VIE consolidation framework.
Valuation of Investments
The Company’s investments are carried at fair value in accordance with the 1940 Act and Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. At June 30, 2013, 86.0% of the Company’s total assets represented investments in portfolio companies that are valued at fair value by the Board of Directors. Value, as defined in Section 2(a)(41) of the 1940 Act, is (i) the market price for those securities for which a market quotation is readily available and (ii) for all other securities and assets, fair value is as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. The Company’s debt securities are primarily invested in venture capital-backed companies in technology-related markets, including technology, biotechnology, life science and clean technology industries. Given the nature of lending to these types of businesses, the Company’s investments in these portfolio companies are considered Level 3 assets under ASC 820 because there is no known or accessible market or market indexes for these investment securities to be traded or exchanged. As such, the Company
42
values substantially all of its investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to a consistent valuation policy and the Company’s Board of Directors in accordance with the provisions of ASC 820 and the 1940 Act. Due to the inherent uncertainty in determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of the Company’s investments determined in good faith by its Board may differ significantly from the value that would have been used had a readily available market existed for such investments, and the differences could be material.
Our Board of Directors may from time to time engage an independent valuation firm to provide the Company with valuation assistance with respect to certain portfolio investments on a quarterly basis. The Company intends to continue to engage an independent valuation firm to provide management with assistance regarding the Company’s determination of the fair value of selected portfolio investments each quarter unless directed by the Board of Directors to cancel such valuation services. The scope of services rendered by an independent valuation firm is at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The Company’s Board of Directors is ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of the Company’s investments in good faith.
With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available or when such market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, the Company’s Board of Directors has approved a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:
(1) the Company’s quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the investment professionals responsible for the portfolio investment;
(2) preliminary valuation conclusions are then documented and business based assumptions are discussed with the Company’s investment committee;
(3) the valuation committee of the Board of Directors reviews the preliminary valuation of the investment committee which incorporates the results of the independent valuation firm as appropriate;
(4) the Board of Directors discusses valuations and determines the fair value of each investment in our portfolio in good faith based on the input of, where applicable, the respective independent valuation firm and the valuation committee.
ASC 820 establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of the assets and liabilities and outlines a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measures on earnings. ASC 820 also enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements based on the level within the hierarchy of the information used in the valuation. ASC 820 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The Company has categorized all investments recorded at fair value in accordance with ASC 820 based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820 and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:
Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets at the measurement date. The types of assets carried at Level 1 fair value generally are equities listed in active markets.
Level 2—Inputs (other than quoted prices included in Level 1) are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset in connection with market data at the measurement date and for the extent of the instrument’s anticipated life. Fair valued assets that are generally included in this category are warrants held in a public company.
Level 3—Inputs reflect management’s best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset at the measurement date. It includes prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. Generally, assets carried at fair value and included in this category are the debt investments and warrants and equities held in a private company.
In accordance with ASU 2011-04, the following table provides quantitative information about the Company’s Level 3 fair value measurements of the Company’s investments as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited). In addition to the techniques and inputs noted in the table below, according to the Company’s valuation policy the Company may also use other valuation techniques and methodologies when determining the Company’s fair value measurements. The below table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but rather provides information on the significant Level 3 inputs as they relate to the Company’s fair value measurements.
43
Investment Type - Level Three Debt Investments
Valuation Techniques/
Methodologies
Unobservable Input (a)
Pharmaceuticals - Debt
Hypothetical Market Yield
Premium/(Discount)
(1.0%) - 1.5%
Average Industry Volatility (c)
Risk Free Interest Rate Estimated Time to Exit (in months)
0.120%
9.13
Medical Devices - Debt
Premium
Technology - Debt
Clean Tech - Debt
Lower Middle Market - Debt
0.00% - 2.00%
Price Quotes
Market Comparable Index Yield Spreads Par Value
$18.2 - $30.0 million
Total Level Three Debt Investments
Pharmaceuticals, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Therapeutic, Specialty Pharmaceuticals, Drug Discovery and Development, Drug Delivery, and Diagnostics and Biotechnology industries in the Schedule of Investments.
Medical Devices, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Therapeutic, Surgical Devices, Medical Devices and Equipment and Biotechnology Tools industries in the Schedule of Investments.
Technology, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Software, Semiconductors, Internet Consumer and Business Services, Information Services, and Communications and Networking industries in the Schedule of Investments.
Lower Middle Market, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Communications and Networking, Electronics and Computer Hardware, Healthcare Services - Other, Information Services, Internet Consumer and Business Services, Media/Content/Info, and Specialty Pharmaceuticals industries in the Schedule of Investments.
Clean Tech, above, aligns with the Clean Tech Industry in the Schedule of Investments.
Investment Type -
Valuation Techniques/Methodologies
Level Three Equity Investments
EBITDA Multiple (b)
Revenue Multiple (b)
Discount for Lack of Marketability (c)
0.7x - 15.5x
10.4% - 25.00%
Level Three Warrant Investments
Warrant positions additionally subject to:
0.12% - 0.62%
12 - 48
Total Level Three Warrant and Equity Investments
44
Debt Investments
The Company’s debt securities are primarily invested in venture capital-backed companies in technology-related markets, including technology, biotechnology, life science and clean technology industries. Given the nature of lending to these types of businesses, the Company’s investments in these portfolio companies are considered Level 3 assets under ASC 820 because there is no known or accessible market or market indexes for these investment securities to be traded or exchanged.
The Company applies a procedure that assumes a sale of investment in a hypothetical market to a hypothetical market participant where buyers and sellers are willing participants. The hypothetical market does not include scenarios where the underlying security was simply repaid or extinguished, but includes an exit concept. Under this process, the Company also evaluates the collateral for recoverability of the debt investments as well as applies all of its historical fair value analysis. The Company uses pricing on recently issued comparable debt securities to determine the baseline hypothetical market yields as of the measurement date. The Company considers each portfolio company’s credit rating, security liens and other characteristics of the investment to adjust the baseline yield to derive a hypothetical yield for each investment as of the measurement date. The anticipated future cash flows from each investment are then discounted at the hypothetical yield to estimate each investment’s fair value as of the measurement date.
The Company’s process includes, among other things, the underlying investment performance, the current portfolio company’s financial condition and market changing events that impact valuation, estimated remaining life, current market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the measurement date. The Company values its syndicated loans using broker quotes and bond indices amongst other factors. If there is a significant deterioration of the credit quality of a debt investment, the Company may consider other factors to estimate fair value, including the proceeds that would be received in a liquidation analysis.
The Company records unrealized depreciation on investments when it believes that an investment has decreased in value, including where collection of a loan is doubtful or if under the in exchange premise when the value of a debt security was to be less than amortized cost of the investment. Conversely, where appropriate, the Company records unrealized appreciation if it believes that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and, therefore, that its investment has also appreciated in value or if under the in exchange premise the value of a debt security were to be greater than amortized cost.
When originating a debt instrument, the Company generally receives warrants or other equity-related securities from the borrower. The Company determines the cost basis of the warrants or other equity-related securities received based upon their respective fair values on the date of receipt in proportion to the total fair value of the debt and warrants or other equity-related securities received. Any resulting discount on the loan from recordation of the warrant or other equity instruments is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan.
Equity-Related Securities and Warrants
Securities that are traded in the over-the-counter markets or on a stock exchange will be valued at the prevailing bid price at period end. The Company has a limited number of equity securities in public companies. In accordance with the 1940 Act, unrestricted publicly traded securities for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the closing market quote on the measurement date.
The Company estimates the fair value of warrants using a Black Scholes pricing model. At each reporting date, privately held warrant and equity-related securities are valued based on an analysis of various factors including, but not limited to, the portfolio company’s operating performance and financial condition and general market conditions, price to enterprise value or price to equity ratios, discounted cash flow, valuation comparisons to comparable public companies or other industry benchmarks. When an external event occurs, such as a purchase transaction, public offering, or subsequent equity sale, the pricing indicated by that external event is utilized to corroborate the Company’s valuation of the warrant and equity-related securities. The Company periodically reviews the valuation of its portfolio companies that have not been involved in a qualifying external event to determine if the enterprise value of the portfolio company may have increased or decreased since the last valuation measurement date.
45
Investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis are categorized in the tables below based upon the lowest level of significant input to the valuations as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and as of December 31, 2012. The Company transfers investments in and out of Level 1, 2 and 3 securities as of the beginning balance sheet date, based on changes in the use of observable and unobservable inputs utilized to perform the valuation for the period. During the six-months ended June 30, 2013, there were no transfers between Levels 1 or 2.
(in thousands)
Description
Senior secured debt
Preferred stock
Common stock
Warrants
46
The table below presents reconciliation for all financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, excluding accrued interest components, using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six-months ended June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012.
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Total
For the six months ended June 30, 2013, approximately $4.0 million and $4.4 million in unrealized appreciation was recorded for equity and warrant Level 3 investments, respectively, relating to assets still held at the reporting date. For the same period, approximately $12.4 million in unrealized depreciation was recorded for Level 3 debt investments relating to assets still held at the reporting date.
For the year ended December 31, 2012, approximately $3.8 million in unrealized appreciation and $2.2 million in unrealized depreciation was recorded for equity and warrant Level 3 investments, respectively, relating to assets still held at the reporting date. For the same period, approximately $2.3 million in unrealized depreciation was recorded for Level 3 debt investments relating to assets still held at the reporting date.
As required by the 1940 Act, the Company classifies its investments by level of control. “Control investments” are defined in the 1940 Act as investments in those companies that the Company is deemed to “control”. Generally, under the 1940 Act, the Company is deemed to “control” a company in which it has invested if it owns 25% or more of the voting securities of such company or has greater than 50% representation on its board. “Affiliate investments” are investments in those companies that are “affiliated companies” of the Company, as defined in the 1940 Act, which are not control investments. The Company is deemed to be an “affiliate” of a company in which it has invested if it owns 5% or more but less than 25% of the voting securities of such company. “Non-control/non-affiliate investments” are investments that are neither control investments nor affiliate investments.
47
The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized gain and loss and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on control and affiliate investments for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited). At June 30, 2013, the Company did not hold any Control Investments.
Gelesis, Inc.
Affiliate
Optiscan BioMedical, Corp.
Maxvision Holding, LLC
E-Band Communications, Corp.
The Company’s investment in MaxVision Holding, L.L.C., a company that was a Control Investment as of June 30, 2012, was liquidated during the year ended December 31, 2012. On July 31, 2012, the Company received payment of $2.0 million for its total debt investments in Maxvision Holding, L.L.C. Approximately $8.7 million of realized losses and $10.5 million of net change in unrealized appreciation was recognized on this control debt and equity investment during the year ended December 31, 2012.
The Company’s investment in E-Band Communications, Corp., a company that was a Non-Controlled Affiliate Investment as of June 30, 2012, was liquidated during the period ended June 30, 2013. Approximately $3.3 million of realized losses and $3.3 million of net change in unrealized appreciation was recognized on this non-controlled affiliate equity investment during the six-months ended June 30, 2013.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, Optiscan BioMedical, Corp. became a non-controlled affiliate as a company in which the Company owns 5% or more but less than 25% of the voting securities of the company.
48
A summary of the composition of the Company’s investment portfolio as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012 at fair value is shown as follows:
Senior secured debt with warrants
A summary of the Company’s investment portfolio, at value, by geographic location as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012:
United States
Netherlands
Canada
England
The following table shows the fair value the Company’s portfolio by industry sector at June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012:
Drug Discovery & Development
Clean Tech
Internet Consumer & Business Services
Medical Device & Equipment
Software
Drug Delivery
Information Services
Communications & Networking
Healthcare Services, Other
Media/Content/Info
Electronics & Computer Hardware
Specialty Pharma
Surgical Devices
Consumer & Business Products
Diagnostic
Semiconductors
Biotechnology Tools
49
During the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013, the Company funded investments in debt securities totaling approximately $201.6 million and $337.9 million, respectively. The Company did not fund any equity investments or convert any debt to equity in the three-months ended June 30, 2013. During the six-months ended June 30, 2013, the Company funded equity investments totaling approximately $2.0 million and converted approximately $836,000 of debt to equity in three portfolio companies.
During the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, the Company funded investments in debt securities, totaling approximately $106.9 million and $169.8 million, respectively. During the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, the Company funded equity investments of approximately $5.0 million and $7.1 million respectively. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, the Company converted approximately $356,000 of debt to equity in one portfolio company.
No single portfolio investment represents more than 10% of the fair value of the investments as of June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012.
During the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recognized net realized gains of approximately $2.2 million and $4.2 million on the portfolio, respectively. During the three-months ended June 30, 2013, the Company recorded gross realized gains of approximately $6.0 million from the sale of investments in 7 portfolio companies, including Althea Technologies (approximately $3.8 million) and Insmed, Inc. (approximately $1.4 million). These gains were partially offset by the liquidation of the Company’s investments in 6 portfolio companies of approximately $3.8 million in gross realized losses, including the complete write off of equity in E-Band Communications, Corp. that had a cost basis of approximately $3.3 million.
During the three and six-months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recognized net realized gains of approximately $8.3 million and $11.1 million on the portfolio, respectively. During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we recorded approximately $5.3 million, $2.4 million and $862,000 of realized gains from the sale of equity and warrant investments in NEXX Systems, Inc., Annie’s, Inc. and Bullhorn, Inc., respectively. These gains were partially offset by realized losses due to the expiration of warrants in three private portfolio companies that had a total cost basis of approximately $222,000.
Loan origination and commitment fees received in full at the inception of a loan are deferred and amortized into fee income as an enhancement to the related loan’s yield over the contractual life of the loan. Loan exit fees to be paid at the termination of the loan are accreted into interest income over the contractual life of the loan. The Company had approximately $4.0 million and $2.0 million of unamortized fees at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and approximately $9.2 million and $6.8 million in exit fees receivable at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
The Company has loans in its portfolio that contain a payment-in-kind (“PIK”) provision. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is added to the principal balance of the loan and recorded as interest income. To maintain the Company’s status as a RIC, this non-cash source of income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends even though the Company has not yet collected the cash. Amounts necessary to pay these dividends may come from available cash or the liquidation of certain investments. The Company recorded approximately $983,000 and $271,000 in PIK income during the three-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company recorded approximately $1.8 million and $569,000 in PIK income in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
In certain investment transactions, the Company may provide advisory services. For services that are separately identifiable and external evidence exists to substantiate fair value, income is recognized as earned, which is generally when the investment transaction closes. The Company had no income from advisory services in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013.
In some cases, the Company collateralizes its investments by obtaining a first priority security interest in a portfolio company’s assets, which may include their intellectual property. In other cases, the Company may obtain a negative pledge covering a company’s intellectual property. At June 30, 2013, approximately 62.5% of the Company’s portfolio company loans were secured by a first priority security in all of the assets of the portfolio company (including their intellectual property), 36.3% of portfolio company loans were to portfolio companies that were prohibited from pledging or encumbering their intellectual property and 1.2% of portfolio company loans had an equipment only lien.
50
3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value estimates are made at discrete points in time based on relevant information. These estimates may be subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and, therefore, cannot be determined with precision. The Company believes that the carrying amounts of its financial instruments, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate the fair values of such items due to the short maturity of such instruments. The Convertible Senior Notes, 2019 Notes payable (the “April 2019 Notes” and the “September 2019 Notes”, together the “2019 Notes”), the Asset-Backed Notes and the SBA debentures as sources of liquidity remain a strategic advantage due to their flexible structure, long-term duration, and low fixed interest rates. At June 30, 2013, the April 2019 Notes were trading on the New York Stock Exchange for $1.028 per dollar at par value, and the September 2019 Notes were trading on the New York Stock Exchange for $1.040 per dollar at par value. Based on market quotations on or around June 30, 2013, the Convertible Senior Notes were trading for $1.1925 per dollar at par value and the Asset-Backed Notes were trading for $1.00375 per dollar at par value. Calculated based on the net present value of payments over the term of the notes using estimated market rates for similar notes and remaining terms, the fair value of the SBA debentures would be approximately $240.0 million, compared to the carrying amount of $225.0 million as of June 30, 2013.
See the accompanying Consolidated Schedule of Investments for the fair value of the Company’s investments. The methodology for the determination of the fair value of the Company’s investments is discussed in Note 1.
The liabilities of the Company below are recorded at amortized cost and not at fair value on the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The following table provides additional information about the level in the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s liabilities:
Convertible Senior Notes
April 2019 Notes
September 2019 Notes
SBA Debentures
4. Borrowings Long-term
On September 27, 2006, HT II received a license to operate as a SBIC under the SBIC program and is able to borrow funds from the SBA against eligible investments and additional contributions to regulatory capital. With the Company’s net investment of $38.0 million in HT II as of June 30, 2013, HT II has the capacity to issue a total of $76.0 million of SBA guaranteed debentures, subject to SBA approval, of which $76.0 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2013, HT II has paid commitment fees of approximately $1.5 million. As of June 30, 2013, the Company held investments in HT II in 46 companies with a fair value of approximately $107.8 million, accounting for approximately 10.4% of the Company’s total portfolio.
On May 26, 2010, HT III received a license to operate as a SBIC under the SBIC program and is able to borrow funds from the SBA against eligible investments and additional contributions to regulatory capital. With the Company’s net investment of $74.5 million in HT III as of June 30, 2013, HT III has the capacity to issue a total of $149.0 million of SBA guaranteed debentures, subject to SBA approval, of which $149.0 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2013, HT III has paid commitment fees of approximately $1.5 million. As of June 30, 2013, the Company held investments in HT III in 38 companies with a fair value of approximately $220.4 million, accounting for approximately 21.2% of the Company’s total portfolio.
SBICs are designed to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under present SBA regulations, eligible small businesses include businesses that have a tangible net worth not exceeding $18.0 million and have average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $6.0 million for the two most recent fiscal years. In addition, SBICs must devote 25.0% of its investment activity to “smaller” concerns as defined by the SBA.
A smaller concern is one that has a tangible net worth not exceeding $6.0 million and has average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $2.0 million for the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also provide alternative size standard criteria to determine eligibility, which depend on the industry in which the business is engaged and are based on such factors as the number of employees and gross sales. According to SBA regulations, SBICs may make long-term loans to small businesses, invest in the equity securities of such businesses and provide them with consulting and advisory services. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries HT II and HT III, the Company plans to provide long-term loans to qualifying small businesses, and in connection therewith, make equity investments.
51
HT II and HT III are periodically examined and audited by the SBA’s staff to determine their compliance with SBA regulations. If HT II or HT III fails to comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could, depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit HT II’s or HT III’s use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures immediately due and payable, and/or limit HT II or HT III from making new investments. In addition, HT II or HT III may also be limited in their ability to make distributions to the Company if they do not have sufficient capital in accordance with SBA regulations. Such actions by the SBA would, in turn, negatively affect the Company because HT II and III are the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. HT II and HT III were in compliance with the terms of the SBIC’s leverage as of June 30, 2013 as a result of having sufficient capital as defined under the SBA regulations.
The rates of borrowings under various draws from the SBA beginning in April 2007 are set semiannually in March and September and range from 2.25% to 5.73%. Interest payments on SBA debentures are payable semiannually. There are no principal payments required on these issues prior to maturity and no prepayment penalties. Debentures under the SBA generally mature ten years after being borrowed. Based on the initial draw down date of April 2007, the initial maturity of SBA debentures will occur in April 2017. In addition, the SBA charges a fee that is set annually, depending on the Federal fiscal year the leverage commitment was delegated by the SBA, regardless of the date that the leverage was drawn by the SBIC. The annual fees related to HT II debentures that pooled on September 22, 2010 were 0.406% and 0.285%, depending upon the year in which the underlying commitment was closed. The annual fees related to HT III debentures that pooled on March 27, 2013, were 0.804%. The annual fees on other debentures have been set at 0.906%. The average amount of debentures outstanding for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 for HT II was approximately $76.0 million with an average interest rate of approximately 5.05%. The average amount of debentures outstanding for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 for HT III was approximately $149.0 million with an average interest rate of approximately 3.42%.
In January 2011, the Company repaid $25.0 million of SBA debentures under HT II, priced at approximately 6.63%, including annual fees. In April 2011, the SBA approved a $25.0 million dollar commitment for HT III.
In February 2012, the Company repaid $24.25 million of SBA debentures under HT II, priced at 6.63%, including annual fees. In June 2012, the SBA approved a $24.25 million dollar commitment for HT III.
In August 2012, the Company repaid $24.75 million of SBA debentures under HT II, $12.0 million priced at 6.43%, including annual fees and $12.75 million priced at 6.38%, including annual fees.
As of June 30, 2013, the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of outstanding SBA guaranteed debentures issued by a single SBIC is $150.0 million, subject to periodic adjustments by the SBA, and a maximum amount of $225.0 million for funds under common control, subject to periodic adjustments by the SBA. In the aggregate, at June 30, 2013 there was $225.0 million principal amount of indebtedness outstanding incurred by our SBIC subsidiaries, the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of SBA guaranteed debentures under the SBIC program.
The Company reported the following SBA debentures outstanding on its Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012:
Issuance/Pooling Date
SBA Debentures:
March 26, 2008
March 25, 2009
September 23, 2009
September 22, 2010
March 29, 2011
September 21, 2011
March 21, 2012
September 19, 2012
March 27, 2013
Total SBA Debentures
52
Wells Facility
In August 2008, the Company entered into a $50.0 million two-year revolving senior secured credit facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance (the “Wells Facility”). On June 20, 2011, the Company renewed the Wells Facility. Under this three-year senior secured facility, Wells Fargo Capital Finance has made commitments of $75.0 million. The facility contains an accordion feature, in which the Company can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $300.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Wells Fargo Capital Finance and subject to other customary conditions. The Company expects to continue discussions with various other potential lenders to join the new facility; however, there can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the Wells Facility.
On August 1, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment to the Wells Facility. The amendment reduces the interest rate floor by 75 basis points to 4.25% and extends the maturity date by one year to August 2015. Additionally, an amortization period of 12 months was added to pay down the principal balance as of the maturity date, and the unused line fee was reduced.
Borrowings under the Wells Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.50%, with a floor of 4.25% and an advance rate of 50% against eligible loans. The Wells Facility is secured by loans in the borrowing base. The Wells Facility requires payment of a non-use fee on a scale of 0.0% to 0.50% of the average monthly outstanding balance. The monthly payment of a non-use fee thereafter shall depend on the average balance that was outstanding on a scale between 0.0% and 0.50%. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, this non-use fee was approximately $95,000. On June 20, 2011 the Company paid an additional $1.1 million in structuring fees in connection with the Wells Facility which is being amortized through the end of the term.
The Wells Facility includes various financial and operating covenants applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries, in addition to those applicable to Hercules Funding II, LLC. These covenants require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding subordinated indebtedness, that is in excess of $362.0 million plus 90% of the cumulative amount of equity raised after June 30, 2012. In addition, the tangible net worth covenant will increase by 90 cents on the dollar for every dollar of equity capital that the Company subsequently raises. As of June 30, 2013, the minimum tangible net worth covenant has increased to $478.5 million as a result of the Company’s follow-on public offerings. The Wells Facility provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at June 30, 2013.
At June 30, 2013, there were no borrowings outstanding on this facility.
Union Bank Facility
On February 10, 2010, the Company entered a $20.0 million one-year revolving senior secured credit facility with Union Bank (the “Union Bank Facility”). On November 2, 2011, the Company renewed and amended the Union Bank Facility and added a new lender under the Union Bank Facility. Union Bank and RBC Capital Markets (“RBC”) have made commitments of $30.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. The Union Bank Facility contains an accordion feature, in which the Company can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $150.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Union Bank and subject to other customary conditions. The Company expects to continue discussions with various other potential lenders to join the new facility; however, there can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the Union Bank Facility.
On March 30, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment to the Union Bank Facility which permitted the Company to issue additional senior notes relating to the offer and sale of our 2019 Notes. On September 17, 2012, the Company entered into an amendment to the Union Bank Facility. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, the Company is permitted to increase its unsecured indebtedness by an aggregate original principal amount not to exceed $200.0 million incurred after March 30, 2012 in one or more issuances, provided certain conditions are satisfied for each issuance.
On December 17, 2012, the Company further amended the Union Bank Facility to remove RBC from the Union Bank Facility. Following the removal of RBC, the Union Bank Facility consists solely of Union Bank’s commitment of $30.0 million. In connection with the amendment, the maximum availability under the Union Bank Facility, subject to a borrowing base, was reduced from $55.0 million to $30.0 million. The Union Bank Facility contains an accordion feature, in which the Company could increase the credit line by up to $95.0 million in the aggregate, funded by commitments from additional lenders and with the agreement of Union Bank and subject to other customary conditions. There can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the Union Bank Facility.
Borrowings under the Union Bank Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.25% with a floor of 4.0%. The Union Bank Facility requires the payment of a non-use fee of 0.50% annually. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, this non-use fee was approximately $38,000. The Union Bank Facility is collateralized by debt investments in our portfolio companies, and includes an advance rate equal to 50.0% of eligible loans placed in the collateral pool. The Union Bank Facility generally requires payment of interest on a monthly basis. All outstanding principal is due upon maturity.
53
The Union Bank Facility requires various financial and operating covenants. These covenants require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding subordinated indebtedness, that is in excess of $314.0 million plus 90% of the amount of net cash proceeds received from the sale of common stock after March 31, 2011. As of June 30, 2013, the minimum tangible net worth covenant has increased to $472.8 million as a result of the Company’s follow-on public offerings. The Union Bank Facility will mature on November 1, 2014, approximately three years from the date of issuance, revolving through the first 24 months with a term out provision for the remaining 12 months. Union Bank Facility also provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at June 30, 2013.
Citibank Credit Facility
The Company, through Hercules Funding Trust I, an affiliated statutory trust, had a securitized credit facility (the “Citibank Credit Facility”) with Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. which expired under normal terms. During the first quarter of 2009, the Company paid off all principal and interest owed under the Citibank Credit Facility. Citigroup has an equity participation right through a warrant participation agreement on the pool of loans and warrants collateralized under the Citibank Credit Facility. Pursuant to the warrant participation agreement, the Company granted to Citigroup a 10% participation in all warrants held as collateral. However, no additional warrants were included in collateral subsequent to the facility amendment on May 2, 2007. As a result, Citigroup is entitled to 10% of the realized gains on the warrants until the realized gains paid to Citigroup pursuant to the agreement equal $3,750,000 (the “Maximum Participation Limit”). The obligations under the warrant participation agreement continue even after the Citibank Credit Facility is terminated until the Maximum Participation Limit has been reached.
During the six-months ended June 30, 2013, the Company reduced its realized gain by approximately $207,000 for Citigroup’s participation in the gain on sale of equity securities which were obtained from exercising a portfolio company warrant which was included in the collateral pool. The Company recorded a decrease on participation liability and an increase on unrealized appreciation by a net amount of approximately $98,000 as a result of depreciation of fair value on the pool of warrants collateralized under the warrant participation agreement. The value of their participation right on unrealized gains in the related equity investments was approximately $215,000 as of June 30, 2013 and is included in accrued liabilities. There can be no assurances that the unrealized appreciation of the warrants will not be higher or lower in future periods due to fluctuations in the value of the warrants, thereby increasing or reducing the effect on the cost of borrowing. Since inception of the agreement, the Company has paid Citigroup approximately $1.6 million under the warrant participation agreement thereby reducing realized gains by this amount. The Company will continue to pay Citigroup under the warrant participation agreement until the Maximum Participation Limit is reached or the warrants expire. Warrants subject to the Citigroup participation agreement are set to expire between August 2013 and January 2017.
In April 2011, the Company issued $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its 6.00% convertible senior notes (the “Convertible Senior Notes”) due 2016.
The Convertible Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”), unless previously converted or repurchased in accordance with their terms. The Convertible Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.00% per year payable semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on October 15, 2011. The Convertible Senior Notes are the Company’s senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to the Company’s existing and future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Convertible Senior Notes; equal in right of payment to the Company’s existing and future unsecured indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to any of the Company’s secured indebtedness (including unsecured indebtedness that the Company later secures) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all existing and future indebtedness (including trade payables) incurred by the Company’s subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.
Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding October 15, 2015, holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes only under certain circumstances set forth in the Indenture. On or after October 15, 2015 until the close of business on the scheduled trading day immediately preceding the Maturity Date, holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes at any time. Upon conversion, the Company will pay or deliver, as the case may be, at its election, cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock. The conversion rate will initially be 84.0972 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $11.89 per share of common stock). The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment in some events but will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, if certain corporate events occur prior to the Maturity Date, the conversion rate will be increased for converting holders. As of June 30, 2013, the conversion rate is 85.1814 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes.
54
The Company may not redeem the Convertible Senior Notes prior to maturity. No sinking fund is provided for the Convertible Senior Notes. In addition, if certain corporate events occur, holders of the Convertible Senior Notes may require the Company to repurchase for cash all or part of their Convertible Senior Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest through, but excluding, the required repurchase date.
The Convertible Senior Notes are accounted for in accordance with ASC 470-20 (previously FASB Staff Position No. APB 14- 1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)”). In accounting for the Convertible Senior Notes, the Company estimated at the time of issuance that the values of the debt and the embedded conversion feature of the Convertible Senior Notes were approximately 92.8% and 7.2%, respectively. The original issue discount of 7.2% attributable to the conversion feature of the Convertible Senior Notes was recorded in “capital in excess of par value” in the accompanying consolidated statement of assets and liabilities. As a result, the Company records interest expense comprised of both stated interest expense as well as accretion of the original issue discount. Additionally, the issuance costs associated with the Convertible Senior Notes were allocated to the debt and equity components in proportion to the allocation of the proceeds and accounted for as debt issuance costs and equity issuance costs, respectively. At the time of issuance, the debt issuance costs and equity issuance costs were approximately $2.9 million and $224,000, respectively. At the time of issuance and as of June 30, 2013, the equity component, net of issuance costs, as recorded in the “capital in excess of par value” in the balance sheet was approximately $5.2 million.
As of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012, the components of the carrying value of the Convertible Senior Notes were as follows:
Principal amount of debt
Original issue discount, net of accretion
Carrying value of debt
For the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the components of interest expense, fees and cash paid for interest expense for the Convertible Senior Notes were as follows (unaudited):
Stated interest expense
Accretion of original issue discount
Amortization of debt issuance cost
Total interest expense
Cash paid for interest expense
The estimated effective interest rate of the debt component of the Convertible Senior Notes, equal to the stated interest of 6.0% plus the accretion of the original issue discount, was approximately 8.1% for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and approximately 8.2% for the three and six-months ended June 30, 2012. As of June 30, 2013, the Company is in compliance with the terms of the indentures governing the Convertible Senior Notes.
On March 6, 2012, the Company and the Trustee entered into an indenture (the “Base Indenture”). On April 17, 2012, the Company and the Trustee entered into the First Supplemental Indenture to the Base Indenture, dated April 17, 2012, relating to the Company’s issuance, offer and sale of $43.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.00% senior notes due 2019 (the “April 2019 Notes”). The sale of the April 2019 Notes generated net proceeds, before expenses, of approximately $41.7 million.
On September 24, 2012, the Company and the Trustee, entered into the Second Supplemental Indenture to the Base Indenture, dated as of September 24, 2012, relating to the Company’s issuance, offer and sale of $75.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.00% senior notes due 2019 (the “September 2019 Notes”). The sale of the September 2019 Notes generated net proceeds, before expenses, of approximately $72.75 million.
55
2019 Notes payable is compromised of:
Carrying Value of Debt
The April 2019 Notes will mature on April 30, 2019 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at the Company’s option at any time or from time to time on or after April 30, 2015, upon not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days written notice by mail prior to the date fixed for redemption thereof, at a redemption price of 100% of the outstanding principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest payments otherwise payable for the then-current quarterly interest period accrued to but not including the date fixed for redemption. The April 2019 Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.00% per year payable quarterly on January 30, April 30, July 30 and October 30 of each year, commencing on July 30, 2012, and trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “HTGZ.”
The April 2019 Notes are the Company’s direct unsecured obligations and rank: (i) pari passu with our other outstanding and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including without limitation, the $75 million in aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes; (ii) senior to any of the Company’s future indebtedness that expressly provides it is subordinated to the April 2019 Notes; (iii) effectively subordinated to all the Company’s existing and future secured indebtedness (including indebtedness that is initially unsecured to which the Company subsequently grants security), to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, including without limitation, borrowings under the Company’s credit facilities; (iv) structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations of any of the Company’s subsidiaries, including without limitation, the indebtedness of Hercules Technology II, L.P. and Hercules Technology III, L.P. and borrowings under the Company’s revolving senior secured credit facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance.
The Base Indenture, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture, contains certain covenants including covenants requiring the Company to comply with (regardless of whether it is subject to) the asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 18 (a)(1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act to comply with the restrictions on dividends, distributions and purchase of capital stock set forth in Section 18(a)(1)(B) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act and to provide financial information to the holders of the April 2019 Notes and the Trustee if the Company should no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the Indenture, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture. The Indenture provides for customary events of default and further provides that the Trustee or the holders of 25% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding April 2019 Notes in a series may declare such April 2019 Notes immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any event of default after expiration of any applicable grace period.
The April 2019 Notes were sold pursuant to an underwriting agreement dated April 11, 2012 among the Company and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, as representative of the several underwriters named in the underwriting agreement.
In July 2012, the Company re-opened our April 2019 Notes and issued an additional amount of approximately $41.5 million in aggregate principal amount of April 2019 Notes, which includes exercise of an over-allotment option, bringing the total amount of the April 2019 Notes issued to approximately $84.5 million in aggregate principal amount.
The September 2019 Notes will mature on September 30, 2019 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at the Company’s option at any time or from time to time on or after September 30, 2015, upon not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days written notice by mail prior to the date fixed for redemption thereof, at a redemption price of 100% of the outstanding principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest payments otherwise payable for the then-current quarterly interest period accrued to but not including the date fixed for redemption. The September 2019 Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.00% per year payable quarterly on March 30, June 30, September 30 and December 30 of each year, commencing on December 30, 2012, and trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “HTGY.”
56
The September 2019 Notes are the Company’s direct unsecured obligations and rank: (i)pari passu with our other outstanding and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including without limitation, the $75 million in aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes; (ii) senior to any of the Company’s future indebtedness that expressly provides it is subordinated to the September 2019 Notes; (iii) effectively subordinated to all the Company’s existing and future secured indebtedness (including indebtedness that is initially unsecured to which the Company subsequently grant security), to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, including without limitation, borrowings under the Company’s credit facilities; (iv) structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations of any of our subsidiaries, including without limitation, the indebtedness of Hercules Technology II, L.P. and Hercules Technology III, L.P. and borrowings under the Company’s revolving senior secured credit facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance.
The Base Indenture, as supplemented by the Second Supplemental Indenture, contains certain covenants including covenants requiring the Company to comply with (regardless of whether it is subject to) the asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 18 (a) (1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act to comply with the restrictions on dividends, distributions and purchase of capital stock set forth in Section 18(a)(1)(B) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act and to provide financial information to the holders of the September 2019 Notes and the Trustee if the Company should no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the Indenture, as supplemented by the Second Supplemental Indenture. The Indenture provides for customary events of default and further provides that the Trustee or the holders of 25% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding September 2019 Notes in a series may declare such September 2019 Notes immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any event of default after expiration of any applicable grace period.
The September 2019 Notes were sold pursuant to an underwriting agreement dated September 19, 2012 among the Company and Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated, as representative of the several underwriters named in the underwriting agreement.
In October 2012, the underwriters exercised their over-allotment option for an additional $10.9 million of the September 2019 Notes, bringing the total amount of the September 2019 Notes issued to approximately $85.9 million in aggregate principal amount.
For the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the components of interest expense and related fees and cash paid for interest expense and fees for the April 2019 and September 2019 Notes are as follows (unaudited):
Total interest expense and fees
Cash paid for interest expense and fees
As of June 30, 2013, the Company is in compliance with the terms of the indenture governing the 2019 Notes.
On December 19, 2012, the Company completed a $230.7 million term debt securitization in connection with which an affiliate of the Company made an offer of $129.3 million in aggregate principal amount of fixed-rate asset-backed notes (the “Asset-Backed Notes”), which Asset-Backed Notes were rated A2(sf) by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. The Asset-Backed Notes were issued by Hercules Capital Funding Trust 2012-1 pursuant to a note purchase agreement, dated as of December 12, 2012, by and among the Company, Hercules Capital Funding 2012-1 LLC, as Trust Depositor (the “Trust Depositor”), Hercules Capital Funding Trust 2012- 1, as Issuer (the “Issuer”), and Guggenheim Securities, LLC, as Initial Purchaser, and are backed by a pool of senior loans made to certain of our portfolio companies and secured by certain assets of those portfolio companies and are to be serviced by the Company. Interest on the Asset-Backed Notes will be paid, to the extent of funds available, at a fixed rate of 3.32% per annum. The Asset-Backed Notes have a stated maturity of December 16, 2017.
As part of this transaction, the Company entered into a sale and contribution agreement with the Trust Depositor under which the Company has agreed to sell or have contributed to the Trust Depositor certain senior loans made to certain of our portfolio companies (the “Loans”). The Company has made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the sale and contribution agreement with respect to the Loans as of the date of their transfer to the Trust Depositor.
57
In connection with the issuance and sale of the Asset-Backed Notes, the Company has made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the note purchase agreement. The Asset-Backed Notes are secured obligations of the Issuer and are non-recourse to the Company. The Issuer also entered into an indenture governing the Asset-Backed Notes, which indenture includes customary representations, warranties and covenants. The Asset-Backed Notes were sold without being registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), to “qualified institutional buyers” in compliance with the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to institutional “accredited investors” (as defined in Rule 501(a)(1), (2), (3) or (7) under the Securities Act) who in each case, are “qualified purchasers” for purposes of Section 3(c)(7) under the 1940 Act. In addition, the Trust Depositor entered into an amended and restated trust agreement, which includes customary representation, warranties and covenants.
The Loans are serviced by the Company pursuant to a sale and servicing agreement, which contains customary representations, warranties and covenants. The Company performs certain servicing and administrative functions with respect to the Loans. The Company is entitled to receive a monthly fee from the Issuer for servicing the Loans. This servicing fee is equal to the product of one-twelfth (or in the case of the first payment date, a fraction equal to the number of days from and including December 5, 2012 through and including January 15, 2013 over 360) of 2.00% and the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Loans, excluding all defaulted Loans and all purchased Loans, as of the first day of the related collection period (the period from the 5th day of the immediately preceding calendar month through the 4th day of the calendar month in which a payment date occurs, and for the first payment date, the period from and including December 5, 2012, to the close of business on January 4, 2013).
The Company also serves as administrator to the Issuer under an administration agreement, which includes customary representations, warranties and covenants.
At June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012, the Asset-Backed Notes had an outstanding balance of $110.3 million and $129.3 million, respectively.
Under the terms of the Asset Backed Notes, the Company is required to maintain a reserve cash balance, funded through interest and principal collections from the underlying securitized debt portfolio, which may be used to pay monthly interest and principal payments on the Asset-Backed Notes. The Company has segregated these funds and classified them as Restricted Cash. There was approximately $1.7 million of Restricted Cash as of June 30, 2013 funded through interest collections. There was no cash segregated at December 31, 2012 due to immaterial monthly interest collections for the period ended December 31, 2012.
58
Outstanding Borrowings
At June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012, the Company had the following borrowing capacity and outstanding borrowings:
Convertible Senior Notes (2)
SBA Debentures (3)
5. Income taxes
The Company has elected to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and intends to continue to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, as such, will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders.
To qualify as a RIC, the Company is required to meet certain income and asset diversification tests in addition to distributing at least 90% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors each quarter and is based upon the annual earnings estimated by the management of the Company. To the extent that the Company’s earnings fall below the amount of dividends declared, however, a portion of the total amount of the Company’s dividends for the fiscal year may be deemed a return of capital for tax purposes to the Company’s stockholders.
Taxable income includes the Company’s taxable interest, dividend and fee income, as well as taxable net capital gains. Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses, and generally excludes net unrealized appreciation or depreciation, as gains or losses are not included in taxable income until they are realized.
Taxable income includes non-cash income, such as changes in accrued and reinvested interest and dividends, which includes contractual payment-in-kind interest, and the amortization of discounts and fees. Cash collections of income resulting from contractual PIK interest or the amortization of discounts and fees generally occur upon the repayment of the loans or debt securities that include such items. Non-cash taxable income is reduced by non-cash expenses, such as realized losses and depreciation and amortization expense.
59
During the three-months ended June 30, 2013, the Company declared a distribution of $0.27 per share. The determination of the tax attributes of the Company’s distributions is made annually as of the end of the Company’s fiscal year based upon its taxable income for the full year and distributions paid for the full year. As a result, a determination made on a quarterly basis may not be representative of the actual tax attributes of the Company’s distributions for a full year. If the Company had determined the tax attributes of our distributions year-to-date as of June 30, 2013, approximately 100% would be from ordinary income and spillover earnings from 2012. However there can be no certainty to shareholders that this determination is representative of what the tax attributes of its 2013 distributions to shareholders will actually be.
As a RIC, the Company will be subject to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax on certain undistributed income unless the Company distributes in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of its ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.2% of its capital gain net income for the 1-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income realized, but not distributed, in the preceding year (the “Excise Tax Avoidance Requirements”). The Company will not be subject to excise taxes on amounts on which the Company is required to pay corporate income tax (such as retained net capital gains). Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, the Company may choose to carry over taxable income in excess of current year distributions from such taxable income into the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income, as required. The maximum amount of excess taxable income that may be carried over for distribution in the next year under the Code is the total amount of dividends paid in the following year, subject to certain declaration and payment guidelines. To the extent the Company chooses to carry over taxable income into the next tax year, dividends declared and paid by the Company in a year may differ from taxable income for that year as such dividends may include the distribution of current year taxable income, the distribution of prior year taxable income carried over into and distributed in the current year, or returns of capital.
Taxable income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $31.7 million or $0.55 per share. Taxable net realized gains for the same period were $5.2 million or approximately $0.09 per share. Taxable income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 was approximately $22.1 million or $0.47 per share. Taxable net realized gains for the same period were $15.3 million or approximately $0.32 per share.
The Company intends to distribute approximately $1.5 million of spillover earnings from the year ended December 31, 2012 to our shareholders in 2013.
6. Shareholders’ Equity
On July 25, 2012, our Board of Directors approved an extension of the stock repurchase plan under the same terms and conditions that allowed the Company to repurchase up to $35.0 million of our common stock. The stock repurchase plan expired on February 26, 2013 and no shares were repurchased in 2013.
On March 13, 2013, the Company raised approximately $95.8 million, before deducting offering expenses, in a public offering of 8,050,000 shares of its common stock.
The Company has issued stock options for common stock subject to future issuance, of which 1,913,018 and 2,574,749 were outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
7. Equity Incentive Plan
The Company and its stockholders have authorized and adopted the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) for purposes of attracting and retaining the services of its executive officers and key employees. Under the 2004 Plan, the Company is authorized to issue 7,000,000 shares of common stock. On June 1, 2011, stockholders approved an amended and restated plan and provided an increase of 1,000,000 shares, authorizing the Company to issue 8,000,000 shares of common stock under the 2004 Plan.
The Company and its stockholders have authorized and adopted the 2006 Non-Employee Director Plan (the “2006 Plan” and, together with the 2004 Plan, the “Plans”) for purposes of attracting and retaining the services of its Board of Directors. Under the 2006 Plan, the Company is authorized to issue 1,000,000 shares of common stock. The Company filed an exemptive relief request with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to allow options to be issued under the 2006 Plan which was approved on October 10, 2007.
60
On June 21, 2007, the stockholders approved amendments to the 2004 Plan and the 2006 Plan allowing for the grant of restricted stock. The amended Plans limit the combined maximum amount of restricted stock that may be issued under both Plans to 10% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s stock on the effective date of the Plans plus 10% of the number of shares of stock issued or delivered by the Company during the terms of the Plans. The amendments further specify that no one person shall be granted awards of restricted stock relating to more than 25% of the shares available for issuance under the 2004 Plan. Further, the amount of voting securities that would result from the exercise of all of the Company’s outstanding warrants, options and rights, together with any restricted stock issued pursuant to the Plans, at the time of issuance shall not exceed 25% of its outstanding voting securities, except that if the amount of voting securities that would result from such exercise of all of the Company’s outstanding warrants, options and rights issued to the Company’s directors, officers and employees, together with any restricted stock issued pursuant to the Plans, would exceed 15% of the Company’s outstanding voting securities, then the total amount of voting securities that would result from the exercise of all outstanding warrants, options and rights, together with any restricted stock issued pursuant to the Plans, at the time of issuance shall not exceed 20% of our outstanding voting securities.
In conjunction with the amendment and in accordance with the exemptive order, on June 21, 2007 the Company made an automatic grant of shares of restricted common stock to Messrs. Badavas, Chow and Woodward, the independent members of its Board of Directors, in the amounts of 1,667, 1,667 and 3,334 shares, respectively. In May 2008, the Company issued restricted shares to Messrs. Badavas and Chow in the amount of 5,000 shares each. In June 2009, the Company issued 5,000 restricted stock shares to Mr. Woodward. The shares were issued pursuant to the 2006 Plan and vested 33% on an annual basis from the date of grant. Deferred compensation cost was recognized ratably over the three year vesting period.
The following table summarizes the common stock options activities for the six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited):
Outstanding at December 31,
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Expired
Outstanding at June 30, 2013
Shares Expected to Vest at June 30,
Options generally vest 33% one year after the date of grant and ratably over the succeeding 24 months. All options may be exercised for a period ending seven years after the date of grant. At June 30, 2013, options for approximately 1.6 million shares were exercisable at a weighted average exercise price of approximately $12.33 per share with weighted average of remaining contractual term of 2.01 years.
The fair value of options granted is based upon a Black Scholes option pricing model using the assumptions in the following table for each of the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:
Expected Volatility
Expected Dividends
Expected term (in years)
Risk-free rate
The following table summarizes stock options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2013 (unaudited):
(Dollars in thousands, except exercise price)
Range of exercise prices
$4.21 - $8.49
$8.67 - $13.21
$13.40 - $14.02
$4.21 - $14.02
61
During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company granted approximately 606,000 shares and 677,000 shares, respectively, of restricted stock pursuant to the Plans. All restricted stock grants under the 2004 Plan made prior to March 4, 2013 will continue to vest on a monthly basis following their one year anniversary over the succeeding 36 months. During 2012, the Compensation Committee adopted a policy that provided for awards with different vesting schedules for short and long-term awards. Under the 2004 Plan, restricted stock awarded subsequent to March 3, 2013 will vest subject to continued employment based on two vesting schedules: short-term awards vest one-half on the one year anniversary of the date of the grant and quarterly over the succeeding 12 months, and long-term awards vest one-fourth on the one year anniversary of the date of grant and quarterly over the succeeding 36 months.
The Company determined that the fair value of restricted stock granted under the 2006 and 2004 Plans during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $7.7 million and $7.3 million, respectively. During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company expensed approximately $1.5 million and $1.1 million of compensation expense related to restricted stock, respectively. During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company expensed approximately $2.6 million and $1.8 million of compensation expense related to restricted stock, respectively. As of June 30, 2013, there was approximately $13.3 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted stock. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.61 years.
The following table summarizes the activities for our unvested restricted stock for the six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited):
Unvested at December 31
Vested
Unvested at June 30
The SEC, through an exemptive order granted on June 22, 2010, approved amendments to the Plans which allow participants to elect to have the Company withhold shares of the Company’s common stock to pay for the exercise price and applicable taxes with respect to an option exercise (“net issuance exercise”). The exemptive order also permits the holders of restricted stock to elect to have the Company withhold shares of Hercules stock to pay the applicable taxes due on restricted stock at the time of vesting. Each individual can make, and does not preclude the participant from electing to make, a cash payment at the time of option exercise or to pay taxes on restricted stock.
8. Earnings Per Share
Shares used in the computation of the Company’s basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows (unaudited):
Numerator
Less: Dividends declared-common and restricted shares
Undistributed earnings
Undistributed earnings-common shares
Add: Dividend declared-common shares
Numerator for basic and diluted change in net assets per common share
Denominator
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
Common shares issuable
Weighted average common shares outstanding assuming dilution
Change in net assets per common share
62
The Convertible Senior Notes may be surrendered for conversion during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of notes for each trading day of the measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of our common stock and the conversion rate on each such trading day. For the purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share for the three and six-month period ended June 30 2013, the underlying shares for the intrinsic value of the embedded options in the Convertible Senior Notes were included in this calculation because the trading price ($11.74) was less than the conversion price in effect for such period for the Convertible Senior Notes.
The calculation of change in net assets resulting from operations per common share—assuming dilution, excludes all anti-dilutive shares. For the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the number of anti-dilutive shares, as calculated based on the weighted average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the periods, was approximately 2,352,585 and 3,622,512 shares, respectively.
At June 30, 2013, the Company was authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001. Each share of common stock entitles the holder to one vote.
9. Financial Highlights
Following is a schedule of financial highlights for the six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Per share data:
Net asset value at beginning of period
Net investment income (1)
Net realized gain (loss) on investments
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments
Total from investment operations
Net increase/(decrease) in net assets from capital share transactions
Distributions
Stock-based compensation expense included in investment income (2)
Net asset value at end of period
Ratios and supplemental data:
Per share market value at end of period
Total return (3)
Shares outstanding at end of period
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
Net assets at end of period
Ratio of operating expense to average net assets
Ratio of net investment income before investment gains and losses to average net assets
Average debt outstanding
Weighted average debt per common share
63
10. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company’s commitments and contingencies consist primarily of unused commitments to extend credit in the form of loans to the Company’s portfolio companies. The balance of unfunded commitments to extend credit at June 30, 2013 totaled approximately $169.1 million. Approximately $95.1 million of these unfunded origination activity commitments as of June 30, 2013 are dependent upon the portfolio company reaching certain milestones before the debt commitment becomes available. Since a portion of these commitments may expire without being drawn, unfunded commitments do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. In addition, the Company had approximately $60.0 million of non-binding term sheets outstanding at June 30, 2013. Non-binding outstanding term sheets are subject to completion of the Company’s due diligence and final approval process, as well as the negotiation of definitive documentation with the prospective portfolio companies. Not all non-binding term sheets are expected to close and do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Certain premises are leased under agreements which expire at various dates through March 2020. Total rent expense amounted to approximately $276,000 and $605,000 during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013. There was approximately $288,000 and $573,000 recorded in the same periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively. Future commitments under the credit facility and operating leases were as follows at June 30, 2013:
Contractual Obligations(1)(2)
Borrowings (3) (4)
Operating Lease Obligations (5)
Excludes commitments to extend credit to our portfolio companies.
The Company also has a warrant participation agreement with Citigroup. See Note 4.
Includes $225.0 million in borrowings under the SBA debentures, $170.4 million of the 2019 Notes, $110.3 million in aggregate principal amount of the Asset-Backed Notes and $72.0 million of the Convertible Senior Notes.
Except for the Convertible Senior Notes, all carrying values are the same as the principal amount outstanding. The aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Convertible Senior Notes less the unaccreted discount initially recorded upon issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes was $3.0 million at June 30, 2013.
Long-term facility leases.
The Company may, from time to time, be involved in litigation arising out of its operations in the normal course of business or otherwise. Furthermore, third parties may try to seek to impose liability on the Company in connection with the activities of its portfolio companies. While the outcome of any current legal proceedings cannot at this time be predicted with certainty, the Company does not expect any current matters will materially affect the Company’s financial condition or results of operations; however, there can be no assurance whether any pending legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations in any future reporting period.
11. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-08, “Financial Services – Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements,” which amends the criteria that define an investment company and clarifies the measurement guidance and requires new disclosures for investment companies. Under ASU 2013-08, an entity already regulated under the 1940 Act is automatically an investment company under the new GAAP definition, so the Company anticipates no impact from adopting this standard on the Company’s statement of assets and liabilities or results of operations. The Company is currently assessing the additional disclosure requirements. ASU 2013-08 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013.
12. Subsequent Events
Dividend Declaration
On July 29, 2013 the Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend by $0.01, or approximately 3.7%, and declared a cash dividend of $0.28 per share to be paid on August 20, 2013 to shareholders of record as of August 13, 2013. This dividend will represent the Company’s thirty-second consecutive dividend declaration since its initial public offering, bringing the total cumulative dividend declared to date to $8.44 per share.
Portfolio Company Developments
In July 2013, Dialog Semiconductor PLC (GR: DLG) acquired Hercules portfolio company iWatt, Inc. for a total potential transaction value of approximately $345.0 million, subject to customary closing conditions.
64
In July 2013, Hercules portfolio company NeurogesX, Inc. (OTCQB:NGSX) completed the sale of certain of its assets to Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. (“Acorda”). In connection with the closing of the Acorda Sale, other assets of NeurogesX, Inc. were sold in an Article 9 sale process. The combination of the Acorda Sale and Article 9 Sale resulted in the sale of substantially all of the assets of NeurogesX, Inc.
In July 2013, ArthroCare Corp. (NASDAQ: ARTC) acquired Hercules portfolio company ENTrigue Surgical, Inc. ArthroCare paid $45.0 million in cash, subject to customary working capital adjustments and an amount held in escrow for indemnification. In addition, the previous shareholders of ENTrigue will have the right to receive contingent consideration for each of the next five years.
In July 2013, CommScope entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Hercules portfolio company Redwood Systems, Inc. Financial terms were not disclosed.
In July 2013, the National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative (NRTC) entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Hercules portfolio company NeoNova. Financial terms were not disclosed.
In July 2013, MedImpact Healthcare Systems, Inc. entered into an agreement to acquire Hercules’ portfolio company ScriptSave. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions.
Forward-Looking Statements
The matters discussed in this report, as well as in future oral and written statements by management of Hercules Technology Growth Capital, that are forward-looking statements are based on current management expectations that involve substantial risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. We generally identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar words. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new investments, achieve certain margins and levels of profitability, the availability of additional capital, and the ability to maintain certain debt to asset ratios. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this report should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans or objectives will be achieved. The forward-looking statements contained in this report include statements as to:
our future operating results;
our business prospects and the prospects of our prospective portfolio companies;
the impact of investments that we expect to make;
the impact of a protracted decline in the liquidity of credit markets on our business;
our informal relationships with third parties including in the venture capital industry;
the expected market for venture capital investments and our addressable market;
the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest;
our ability to access debt markets and equity markets;
the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives;
our expected financings and investments;
our regulatory structure and tax status;
our ability to operate as a BDC, a SBIC and a RIC;
the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital;
the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies;
the timing, form and amount of any dividend distributions;
the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on our business;
the valuation of any investments in portfolio companies, particularly those having no liquid trading market; and
our ability to recover unrealized losses.
65
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this report contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking information due to the factors discussed under Item 1A—“Risk Factors” of Part II of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, Item 1A—“Risk Factors” of our annual report on Form 10-K, and “Forward-Looking Statements” of this Item 2.
Overview
We are a specialty finance company focused on providing senior secured loans to venture capital-backed companies in technology-related markets, including technology, biotechnology, life science, and clean-technology industries at all stages of development. We source our investments through our principal office located in Silicon Valley, as well as through our additional offices in Boston, MA, New York, NY, Chicago, IL, Boulder, CO and McLean, VA.
Our goal is to be the leading structured debt financing provider of choice for venture capital-backed companies in technology-related markets requiring sophisticated and customized financing solutions. Our strategy is to evaluate and invest in a broad range of technology-related markets including technology, biotechnology, life science, and clean-technology industries and to offer a full suite of growth capital products up and down the capital structure. We invest primarily in structured debt with warrants and, to a lesser extent, in senior debt and equity investments. We invest primarily in private companies and to a lesser extent public companies. We use the term “structured debt with warrants” to refer to any debt investment, such as a senior or subordinated secured loan, that is coupled with an equity component, including warrants, options or rights to purchase common or preferred stock. Our structured debt with warrants investments will typically be secured by some or all of the assets of the portfolio company.
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio total return by generating current income from our debt investments and capital appreciation from our equity-related investments. Our primary business objectives are to increase our net income, net operating income and net asset value by investing in structured debt with warrants and equity of venture capital-backed companies in technology-related markets with attractive current yields and the potential for equity appreciation and realized gains. Our structured debt investments typically include warrants or other equity interests, giving us the potential to realize equity-like returns on a portion of our investments. Our equity ownership in our portfolio companies may represent a controlling interest. In some cases, we receive the right to make additional equity investments in our portfolio companies in connection with future equity financing rounds. Capital that we provide directly to venture capital-backed companies in technology-related markets is generally used for growth and general working capital purposes as well as in select cases for acquisitions or recapitalizations.
We also make investments in qualifying small businesses through two wholly-owned SBICs, HT II and HT III hold approximately $156.8 million and $265.3 million in assets, respectively, and accounted for approximately 10.1% and 17.0% of our total assets prior to consolidation at June 30, 2013. We have issued $225.0 million in SBA-guaranteed debentures in our SBIC subsidiaries, which is the maximum amount allowed for a group of SBICs under common control.
We are an internally managed, non-diversified closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. As a business development company, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, we generally have to invest at least 70% of our total assets in “qualifying assets,” including securities of private U.S. companies, cash, cash equivalents, and high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less.
From incorporation through December 31, 2005, we were taxed as a corporation under Subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code. As of January 1, 2006, we have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or a RIC, under Subchapter M of the Code. Pursuant to this election, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level taxes on any income that we distribute to our stockholders. However, such an election and qualification to be treated as a RIC requires that we comply with certain requirements contained in Subchapter M of the Code. For example, a RIC must meet certain requirements, including source-of income, asset diversification and income distribution requirements. The income source requirement mandates that we receive 90% or more of our income from qualified earnings, typically referred to as “good income.”
Our portfolio is comprised of, and we anticipate that our portfolio will continue to be comprised of, investments primarily in technology-related companies at various stages of their development. Consistent with regulatory requirements, we invest primarily in United States based companies and to a lesser extent in foreign companies.
We regularly engage in discussions with third parties with respect to various potential transactions. We may acquire an investment or a portfolio of investments or an entire company or sell a portion of our portfolio on an opportunistic basis. We, our subsidiaries or our affiliates may also agree to manage certain other funds that invest in debt, equity or provide other financing or services to companies in a variety of industries for which we may earn management or other fees for our services. We may also invest in the equity of these funds, along with other third parties, from which we would seek to earn a return and/or future incentive allocations. Some of these transactions could be material to our business. Consummation of any such transaction will be subject to completion of due diligence, finalization of key business and financial terms (including price) and negotiation of final definitive documentation as well as a number of other factors and conditions including, without limitation, the approval of our board of directors and required regulatory or third party consents and, in certain cases, the approval of our stockholders. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that any such transaction would be consummated. Any of these transactions or funds may require significant management resources either during the transaction phase or on an ongoing basis depending on the terms of the transaction.
66
Portfolio and Investment Activity
The total value of our investment portfolio was $1,041.1 million at June 30, 2013 as compared to $906.3 million at December 31, 2012.
The fair value of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2013 was approximately $949.7 million, compared to a fair value of approximately $827.5 million at December 31, 2012. The fair value of the equity portfolio at June 30, 2013 was approximately $56.2 million, compared to a fair value of approximately $49.2 million at December 31, 2012. The fair value of the warrant portfolio at June 30, 2013 was approximately $35.2 million, compared to a fair value of approximately $29.5 million at December 31, 2012.
Portfolio Activity
Our investments in portfolio companies take a variety of forms, including unfunded contractual commitments and funded investments. From time to time, unfunded contractual commitments are dependent upon a portfolio company reaching certain milestones before the debt commitment is available to the portfolio company, which is expected to affect our funding levels. These commitments will be subject to the same underwriting and ongoing portfolio maintenance as the on-balance sheet financial instruments that we hold. Debt commitments generally fund over the two succeeding quarters from close. Not all debt commitments represent our future cash requirements. Similarly, unfunded contractual commitments may expire without being drawn and do not represent our future cash requirements.
Prior to entering into a contractual commitment, we generally issue a non-binding term sheet to a prospective portfolio company. Non-binding term sheets are subject to completion of our due diligence and final approval process, as well as the negotiation of definitive documentation with the prospective portfolio companies and generally convert to contractual commitments within approximately 45 to 60 days of signing. Not all non-binding term sheets are expected to close and do not necessarily represent our future cash requirements.
Our portfolio activity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and the year ended December 31, 2012 was comprised of the following:
(in millions)
Debt Commitments (1)
New portfolio company
Existing portfolio company
Funded Debt Investments
Funded Equity Investments
Unfunded Contractual Commitments (2)
Non-Binding Term Sheets
We receive payments in our loan portfolio based on scheduled amortization of the outstanding balances. In addition, we receive repayments of some of our loans prior to their scheduled maturity date. The frequency or volume of these repayments may fluctuate significantly from period to period. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, we received approximately $206.4 million in principal repayments, including approximately $35.0 million of principal repayments related to a renewal of an existing debt investment, $93.3 million of early principal repayments and approximately $78.1 million in scheduled principal payments.
67
Total portfolio investment activity (inclusive of unearned income) for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and
for the year ended December 31, 2012 was as follows:
Beginning Portfolio
New Fundings
Warrants not related to current period fundings
Early payoffs
Restructure payoffs
Restructure fundings
Accretion of loan discounts and paid-in-kind principal
New loan fees
Conversion of “Other Assets”
Debt Converted to Equity
Warrants converted to Equity
Net realized (loss) gain on investments
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
Ending Portfolio
The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio of investments by asset class as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012.
A summary of our investment portfolio at value by geographic location is as follows:
As of June 30, 2013, we held warrants or equity positions in six companies which have filed registration statements on Form S-1 with the SEC in contemplation of potential initial public offerings. ADMA Biologics, Inc., iWatt, Inc., Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and three additional companies that filed a Form S-1 Registration confidentially under the JOBS Act. There can be no assurance that these companies will complete their initial public offerings in a timely manner or at all.
Subsequent to quarter end, iWatt Inc. withdrew its Form S-1 Registration Statement due to the company being acquired by Dialog Semiconductor PLC (GR: DLG) for a total potential transaction value of approximately $345.0 million, subject to closing conditions, and Paratek Pharmaceuticals, Inc. withdrew its Form S-1 Registration Statement for an IPO.
Changes in Portfolio
We generate revenue in the form of interest income, primarily from our investments in debt securities, and commitment and facility fees. Fees generated in connection with our debt investments are recognized over the life of the loan or, in some cases, recognized as earned. In addition, we generate revenue in the form of capital gains, if any, on warrants or other equity-related securities that we acquire from our portfolio companies. Our investments generally range from $1.0 million to $25.0 million. Our debt investments have a term of between two and seven years and typically bear interest at a rate ranging from Prime to approximately
68
14.0% as of June 30, 2013. In addition to the cash yields received on our loans, in some instances, our loans may also include any of the following: end-of-term payments, exit fees, balloon payment fees, commitment fees, success fees, PIK provisions or prepayment fees which may be required to be included in income prior to receipt. Loan origination and commitment fees received in full at the inception of a loan are deferred and amortized into fee income as an enhancement to the related loan’s yield over the contractual life of the loan. We recognize nonrecurring fees amortized over the remaining term of the loan commencing in the quarter relating to specific loan modifications. Loan exit fees to be paid at the termination of the loan are accreted into interest income over the contractual life of the loan. We had approximately $4.0 million and $2.0 million of unamortized fees at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, and approximately $9.2 million and $6.8 million in exit fees receivable at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The increase of both unamortized fees and exit fees receivable is attributable to overall growth of the loan portfolio.
We have loans in our portfolio that contain a PIK provision. The PIK interest, computed at the contractual rate specified in each loan agreement, is added to the principal balance of the loan and recorded as interest income. To maintain our status as a RIC, this non-cash source of income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends even though we have not yet collected the cash. Amounts necessary to pay these dividends may come from available cash or the liquidation of certain investments. We recorded approximately $983,000 and $271,000 in PIK income during the three-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We recorded approximately $1.8 million and $569,000 in PIK income in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
In some cases, we may collateralize our investments by obtaining a first priority security interest in a portfolio company’s assets, which may include their intellectual property. In other cases, we may obtain a negative pledge covering a company’s intellectual property. At June 30, 2013, approximately 62.5% of our portfolio company loans were secured by a first priority security in all of the assets of the portfolio company, 36.3% of the loans were to portfolio companies that were prohibited from pledging or encumbering their intellectual property and 1.2% of portfolio company loans had an equipment only lien.
Interest on debt securities is generally payable monthly, with amortization of principal typically occurring over the term of the security. In addition, certain loans may include an interest-only period ranging from three to eighteen months or longer. In limited instances in which we choose to defer amortization of the loan for a period of time from the date of the initial investment, the principal amount of the debt securities and any accrued but unpaid interest become due at the maturity date.
The effective yield on our debt investments during the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was 15.7% and 15.2%, respectively. Excluding the effect of fee accelerations that occurred from early payoffs and one-time events, the adjusted effective yield for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 was 14.2%. The adjusted effective yield for the three-month period ended December 31, 2012 was 13.6%. The effective yield is derived by dividing total investment income by the weighted average earning investment portfolio assets outstanding during the quarter which exclude non-interest earning assets such as warrants and equity investments. The overall weighted average yield to maturity of our loan investments was approximately 13.22% at June 30, 2013, a slight increase compared to 12.91% at December 31, 2012. The weighted average yield to maturity is computed using the interest rates in effect at the inception of each of the loans, and includes amortization of the loan facility fees, commitment fees and market premiums or discounts over the expected life of the debt investments, weighted by their respective costs when averaged and based on the assumption that all contractual loan commitments have been fully funded and held to maturity.
Portfolio Composition
Our portfolio companies are primarily privately held companies and, to a lesser extent, public companies which are active in the drug discovery and development, internet consumer and business services, clean technology, software, drug delivery, medical device and equipment, media/content/info, communications and networking, information services, healthcare services, diagnostic, specialty pharmaceuticals, biotechnology tools, surgical devices, consumer and business products, semiconductors, electronics and computer hardware and therapeutic industry sectors. These sectors are characterized by high margins, high growth rates, consolidation and product and market extension opportunities. Value is often vested in intangible assets and intellectual property.
As of June 30, 2013, approximately 59.9% of the fair value of our portfolio was composed of investments in four industries: 20.8% was composed of investments in the drug discovery and development industry, 14.5% was composed of investments in the internet consumer and business services industry, 15.1% was composed of investments in the clean technology industry and 9.5% was composed of investments in the medical device and equipment industry.
69
The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio by industry sector at June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012:
Industry and sector concentrations vary as new loans are recorded and loans pay off. Loan revenue, consisting of interest, fees, and recognition of gains on equity interests, can fluctuate dramatically when a loan is paid off or a related warrant or equity interest is sold. Revenue recognition in any given year can be highly concentrated among several portfolio companies.
For the six-months ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012, our ten largest portfolio companies represented approximately 30.6% and 35.2% of the total fair value of our investments in portfolio companies, respectively. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had four and eight investments, respectively, that represented 5% or more of our net assets. At June 30, 2013, we had seven equity investments representing approximately 67.9% of the total fair value of our equity investments, and each represented 5% or more of the total fair value of our equity investments. At December 31, 2012, we had six equity investments which represented approximately 70.9% of the total fair value of our equity investments, and each represented 5% or more of the total fair value of such investments.
As of June 30, 2013, over 98.8% of our debt investments were in a senior secured first lien position, and more than 98.1% of the debt investment portfolio was priced at floating interest rates or floating interest rates with a Prime or LIBOR based interest rate floor. As a result, we believe we are well positioned to benefit should market rates increase. Our investments in senior secured debt with warrants have equity enhancement features, typically in the form of warrants or other equity-related securities designed to provide us with an opportunity for capital appreciation. Our warrant coverage generally ranges from 3% to 20% of the principal amount invested in a portfolio company, with a strike price equal to the most recent equity financing round. As of June 30, 2013, we held warrants in 120 portfolio companies, with a fair value of approximately $35.2 million. The fair value of the warrant portfolio has increased by approximately 19.3% as compared to the fair value of $29.5 million at December 31, 2012. These warrant holdings would require us to invest approximately $74.8 million to exercise such warrants. Warrants may appreciate or depreciate in value depending largely upon the underlying portfolio company’s performance and overall market conditions. Of the warrants which have monetized since inception, we have realized warrant gain multiples in the range of approximately 1.04x to 14.91x based on the historical rate of return on our investments. However, these warrants may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our warrant interests.
As required by the 1940 Act, we classify our investments by level of control. “Control investments” are defined in the 1940 Act as investments in those companies that we are deemed to “control”. Generally, under the 1940 Act, we are deemed to “control” a company in which we have invested if we own 25% or more of the voting securities of such company or have greater than 50% representation on its board. “Affiliate investments” are investments in those companies that are “affiliated companies” of ours, as defined in the 1940 Act, which are not control investments. We are deemed to be an “affiliate” of a company in which we have invested if we own 5% or more but less than 25% of the voting securities of such company. “Non-control/non-affiliate investments” are investments that are neither control investments nor affiliate investments.
70
The following table summarizes our realized and unrealized gain and loss and changes in our unrealized appreciation and depreciation on control and affiliate investments for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited):
Our investment in MaxVision Holding, L.L.C., a company that was a Control Investment as of June 30, 2012, was liquidated during the year ended December 31, 2012. On July 31, 2012, we received payment of $2.0 million for our total debt investments in Maxvision Holding, L.L.C. Approximately $8.7 million of realized losses and $10.5 million of net change in unrealized appreciation was recognized on this control debt and equity investment during the year ended December 31, 2012.
Our investment in E-Band Communications, Corp., a company that was a Non-Controlled Affiliate Investment as of June 30, 2012, was liquidated during the period ended June 30, 2013. Approximately $3.3 million of realized losses and $3.3 million of net change in unrealized appreciation was recognized on this non-controlled affiliate equity investment during the six-months ended June 30, 2013.
During the year ended December 31, 2012, Optiscan BioMedical, Corp. became a non-controlled affiliate as a company in which we own 5% or more but less than 25% of the voting securities of the company.
Portfolio Grading
We use an investment grading system, which grades each debt investment on a scale of 1 to 5, to characterize and monitor our expected level of risk on the debt investments in our portfolio with 1 being the highest quality. The following table shows the distribution of our outstanding debt investments on the 1 to 5 investment grading scale at fair value as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012, respectively:
Investment Grading
1
As of June 30, 2013, our investments had a weighted average investment grading of 2.11 as compared to 2.06 at December 31, 2012. Our policy is to lower the grading on our portfolio companies as they approach the point in time when they will require additional equity capital. Additionally, we may downgrade our portfolio companies if they are not meeting our financing criteria and their respective business plans. Various companies in our portfolio will require additional funding in the near term or have not met their business plans and have therefore been downgraded until their funding is complete or their operations improve.
At June 30, 2013, we had two loans on non-accrual, one with a fair value of approximately $5.5 million and the other with no fair market value compared to one loan on non-accrual at December 31, 2012 with no fair market value.
71
Results of Operations
Comparison of the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012
Investment Income
Total investment income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $34.5 million as compared to approximately $23.9 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. Total investment income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $65.5 million as compared to approximately $46.2 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012.
Interest income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 totaled approximately $30.3 million as compared to approximately $21.1 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. Interest income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 totaled approximately $59.2 million as compared to approximately $41.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. In general, the increase in interest income is attributable to overall growth in the loan portfolio. Specifically, the increase in interest income is attributable to an increase of loan interest income of approximately $7.3 million and $14.3 million for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, respectively, and an increase of PIK interest income of approximately $712,000 and $1.2 million for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, respectively.
Income from commitment, facility and loan related fees for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 totaled approximately $4.2 million as compared to approximately $2.7 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. Income from commitment, facility and loan related fees for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 totaled approximately $6.3 million as compared to approximately $4.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. The increase in fee income is attributable to additional fee accelerations due to early pay-offs during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 as compared to the same periods in 2012.
The following table shows the PIK-related activity for the six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, at cost (unaudited):
Beginning PIK loan balance
PIK interest capitalized during the period
Payments received from PIK loans
Ending PIK loan balance
The increase in payments received from PIK loans and PIK interest capitalized during the six-months ended June 30, 2013 is due to the addition of three PIK loans which have incurred PIK capitalizations during the period and the payoff of two PIK loans during the period ended June 30, 2013.
In certain investment transactions, we may provide advisory services. For services that are separately identifiable and external evidence exists to substantiate fair value, income is recognized as earned, which is generally when the investment transaction closes. We had no income from advisory services in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
72
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses, which are comprised of interest and fees on borrowings, general and administrative and employee compensation, totaled approximately $16.9 million and $11.5 million during the three month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Operating expenses totaled approximately $32.8 million and $22.5 million during the six month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Interest and Fees on Borrowing
Interest and fees on borrowings totaled approximately $8.8 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared to approximately $5.2 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to interest and fee expenses of approximately $3.2 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 related to the 2019 Notes issued in April 2012 and September 2012 and approximately $1.3 million related to the Asset-Backed Notes issued in December 2012. These expenses were partially offset by a decrease in interest and fees of approximately $236,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 associated with our SBA debentures due to the pay down in August 2012 of $12.0 million priced at 6.43%, including annual fees, and $12.75 million priced at 6.38%, including annual fees. Additional borrowings in November 2012 of SBA debentures priced on March 27, 2013 at 3.16%, including annual fees.
Interest and fees on borrowings totaled approximately $17.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared to approximately $10.2 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. This increase was primarily attributable to interest and fee expenses of approximately $6.4 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 related to the 2019 Notes issued in April 2012 and September 2012 and approximately $2.6 million related to the Asset-Backed Notes issued in December 2012. These expenses were partially offset by a decrease in interest and fees of approximately $936,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 associated with our SBA debentures due to the pay down in August 2012 discussed above.
We had a weighted average cost of debt comprised of interest and fees of approximately 6.0% at June 30, 2013, as compared to 6.7% during June 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily driven by the Asset-Backed Notes issued in December 2012, which account for approximately 19.1% of our outstanding debt and accrue interest at 3.32%. As of June 30, 2013 the weighted average debt outstanding was approximately $589.2 million.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses include legal fees, consulting fees, accounting fees, printer fees, insurance premiums, rent, workout and various other expenses. Expenses increased to $2.4 million from $1.9 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These increases were primarily due to increases of approximately $357,000, $187,000 and $53,000 related to outside consulting services, legal fees and SEC printing fees, respectively, partially offset by a decrease of approximately $89,000 for marketing expenses in the three-month period ended June 30, 2013. Expenses increased to $4.6 million from $3.7 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These increases were primarily due to increases of approximately $424,000, $279,000 and $196,000 related to outside consulting services, office and transportation expenses as a result of increased headcount and legal fees, respectively, partially offset by a decrease of approximately $50,000 for marketing expenses in the six-month period ended June 30, 2013.
Employee Compensation
Employee compensation and benefits totaled approximately $4.2 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared to approximately $3.3 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 and approximately $8.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared to approximately $6.6 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. This increase was due to increasing our staff to 59 active employees from 51 active employees at June 30, 2012 and increasing our variable compensation (bonus) accrual based on performance improvements.
Stock-based compensation totaled approximately totaled approximately $1.6 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared to approximately $1.2 million for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 and approximately $2.8 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 as compared to approximately $2.0 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012. These increases were due primarily to the expense on restricted stock grants of approximately 606,000 shares granted in the first quarter of 2013. See “Financial Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources” for disclosure of additional expenses.
Net Investment Income Before Investment Gains and Losses
Net investment income for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $17.6 million and $12.3 million, respectively. Net investment income before income tax expense for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 totaled approximately $32.6 million and $23.7 million, respectively. The changes are made up of the items described above under “Investment Income” and “Operating Expenses.”
73
Net Investment Realized Gains and Losses and Unrealized Appreciation and Depreciation
Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the cost basis of the investment without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized, and includes investments charged off during the period, net of recoveries. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation primarily reflects the change in portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.
A summary of realized gains and losses for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:
Realized gains
Realized losses
Net realized gains
During the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, we recognized net realized gains of approximately $2.2 million and approximately $8.3 million, respectively. During the three-months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded gross realized gains of approximately $6.0 million from the sale of investments in seven portfolio companies, including Althea Technologies (approximately $3.8 million) and Insmed, Inc. (approximately $1.4 million). These gains were partially offset by the liquidation of our investments in six portfolio companies of approximately $3.8 million in gross realized losses, including the complete write off of equity in E-Band Communications, Corp. that had a cost basis of approximately $3.3 million.
During the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, we recognized net realized gains of approximately $4.2 million and $11.1 million, respectively. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, we recorded additional gross realized gains of approximately $3.7 million from the sale of investments in three portfolio companies. These gains were partially offset by the liquidation of our investments in five portfolio companies of approximately $1.6 million in gross realized losses.
The net unrealized appreciation and depreciation of our investments is based on fair value of each investment determined in good faith by our Board of Directors. The following table itemizes the change in net unrealized appreciation/depreciation of investments for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:
Gross unrealized appreciation on portfolio investments
Gross unrealized depreciation on portfolio investments
Reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation upon a realization event
Reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation upon a realization event
Citigroup Warrant Participation
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on portfolio investments
During the three-months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded approximately $755,000 of net unrealized appreciation from our debt, equity and warrant investments. Approximately $5.6 million is attributed to net unrealized appreciation on equity, of which approximately $72,000 is due to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation upon being realized as a gain and $3.3 million is due to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation upon being realized as a loss. Approximately $330,000 million is attributed to net unrealized appreciation on our warrant investments, of which approximately $4.8 million is due to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation upon being realized as a gain and $940,000 is due to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation upon being realized as a loss. We recorded approximately $5.1 million of net unrealized depreciation on our debt investments, $4.1 million related to decreases in fair value adjustments made as a result of an increase in interest rates reflected in our current quarter effective yield.
During the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, net unrealized investment appreciation recognized by us was decreased by approximately $83,000 as a result of appreciation during the three-month period ended June 30, 2013 of fair value on the pool of warrants collateralized under the warrant participation agreement.
74
During the three month period ended June 30, 2012, we recorded approximately $20.5 million of net unrealized depreciation from our loans, warrant and equity investments. Approximately $5.0 million and $5.8 million is attributed to net unrealized depreciation on equity and warrants, respectively, of which approximately $5.2 million and $1.7 million is due to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation upon being realized as a gain. Additionally, we recorded approximately $500,000 of unrealized depreciation attributed to reduced expectations of escrow proceeds previously anticipated to be collected.
During the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, we recorded approximately $9.2 million net unrealized depreciation on our debt investments related to decreases in fair value adjustments made as a result of an increase in current quarter effective yield.
The following table itemizes the change in net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) in the investment portfolio by category for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
Collateral based impairments
Reversals of Prior Period Collateral based impairments
Reversals due to Loan Payoffs & Warrant/Equity sales
Fair Value Market/Yield Adjustments*
Level 1 & 2 Assets
Level 3 Assets
Total Fair Value Market/Yield Adjustments
Total Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation)
75
During the six-months ended June 30, 2013, we recorded approximately $747,000 of net unrealized depreciation from our debt, equity and warrant investments. Approximately $7.5 million is attributed to net unrealized appreciation on equity, of which approximately $164,000 is due to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation upon being realized as a gain and $3.5 million is due to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation upon being realized as a loss. Approximately $4.2 million is attributed to net unrealized appreciation on our warrant investments, of which approximately $6.8 million is due to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation upon being realized as a gain and $2.3 million is due to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation upon being realized as a loss. We recorded approximately $12.4 million of net unrealized depreciation on our debt investments, $5.6 million related to decreases in fair value adjustments made as a result of an increase in interest rates reflected in our current quarter effective yield.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, net unrealized investment appreciation recognized by us was increased by approximately $98,000 as a result of depreciation during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 of fair value on the pool of warrants collateralized under the warrant participation agreement.
During the six month period ended June 30, 2012, we recorded approximately $17.7 million of net unrealized depreciation from our loans, warrant and equity investments. Approximately $2.3 million and $4.2 million is attributed to net unrealized depreciation on equity and warrants, respectively, of which approximately $6.4 million and $4.6 million is due to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation upon being realized as a gain. Additionally, we recorded approximately $500,000 of unrealized depreciation attributed to reduced expectations of escrow proceeds previously anticipated to be collected.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2012, we recorded approximately $10.7 million net unrealized depreciation on our debt investments related to fluctuations in current market interest rates.
The following table itemizes the change in net unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) in the investment portfolio by category for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.
76
Income and Excise Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes, which requires that deferred income taxes be determined based upon the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities given the provisions of the enacted tax law. Valuation allowances are used to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount likely to be realized. We intend to distribute approximately $1.5 million of spillover earnings from the year ended December 31, 2012 to our shareholders in 2013.
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations and Change in Net Assets per Share
For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the net increase in net assets resulting from operations totaled approximately $20.9 million and approximately $48,000, respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the net increase in net assets resulting from operations totaled approximately $37.6 million and $17.2 million, respectively. These changes are made up of the items previously described.
Both the basic and fully diluted net change in net assets per common share was $0.34 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2013. There was no net change in net assets per common share for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. The basic and fully diluted net change in net assets per common share for the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 was and $0.65 and $0.64, respectively, whereas both the basic and fully diluted net change in net assets per common share for the six-month period ended June 30, 2012 was $0.35.
Financial Condition, Liquidity, and Capital Resources
Our liquidity and capital resources are derived from our Wells Facility, Union Bank Facility (together the “Credit Facilities”), SBA debentures, Convertible Senior Notes, 2019 Notes, Asset-Backed Notes and cash flows from operations, including investment sales and repayments, and income earned. Our primary use of funds from operations includes investments in portfolio companies and payments of fees and other operating expenses we incur. We have used, and expect to continue to use, our borrowings and the proceeds from the rotation of our portfolio and from public and private offerings of securities to finance our investment objectives. We may raise additional equity or debt capital through both registered offerings off a shelf registration and private offerings of securities, by securitizing a portion of our investments or borrowing, including from the SBA through our SBIC subsidiaries.
At June 30, 2013, we had $75.0 million of Convertible Senior Notes payable, $170.4 million of 2019 Notes, $110.3 million of Asset-Backed Notes and $225.0 million of SBA debentures payable. We had no borrowings outstanding under either the Wells Facility or the Union Bank Facility.
At June 30, 2013, we had $238.9 million in available liquidity, including $133.9 million in cash and cash equivalents. We had available borrowing capacity of approximately $75.0 million under the Wells Facility and $30.0 million under the Union Bank Facility, subject to existing terms and advance rates and regulatory requirements. We primarily invest cash on hand in interest bearing deposit accounts.
At June 30, 2013, we had approximately $1.7 million of restricted cash. Our restricted cash consists of collections of interest and principal payments on assets that are securitized. In accordance with the terms of the related securitized Asset-Backed Notes, based on current characteristics of the securitized loan portfolios, the restricted funds may be used to pay monthly interest and principal on the securitized debt and are not distributed to us or available for our general operations. During the six-months ended June 30, 2013, we principally funded our operations from (i) cash receipts from interest, dividend and fee income from our investment portfolio and (ii) cash proceeds from the realization of portfolio investments through the repayments of loan investments and the sale of loan and equity investments.
During the six-months ended June 30, 2013, our operating activities used $93.6 million of cash and cash equivalents, compared to $42.7 million used during the six-months ended June 30, 2012. The $50.9 million increase in cash used in operating activities resulted primarily from additional purchases of investments of approximately $164.0 million partially offset by an increase in principal payments received on investments of approximately $103.8 million. During the six-months ended June 30, 2013, our investing activities used $1.8 million of cash, compared to $40,000 during six-months ended June 30, 2012. This $1.8 million increase in cash used by investing activities was primarily due to an increase in cash collections of interest and principal payments, classified as restricted cash, on assets that are securitized.
During the six-months ended June 30, 2013, our financing activities provided $46.4 million of cash, compared to $34.4 million during the six-months ended June 30, 2012. This $12.0 million increase in cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to an increase in proceeds from issuance of common stock of $47.6 million and a decrease in repayments of credit facilities of $27.3 million partially offset by a decrease in borrowings of credit facilities of $15.0 million and the Issuance of our 2019 Notes of $43.0 million in 2012.
As of June 30, 2013, net assets totaled $621.8 million, with a net asset value per share of $10.09. We intend to generate additional cash primarily from cash flows from operations, including income earned from investments in our portfolio companies and, to a lesser extent, from the temporary investment of cash in other high-quality debt investments that mature in one year or less as well as from future borrowings as required to meet our lending activities. Our primary use of funds will be investments in portfolio companies and cash distributions to holders of our common stock.
77
Additionally, we expect to raise additional capital to support our future growth through future equity and debt offerings, and/or future borrowings, to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act. To the extent we determine to raise additional equity through an offering of our common stock at a price below net asset value, existing investors will experience dilution. During our 2013 Annual Shareholder Meeting held on May 30, 2013, our stockholders authorized us, with the approval of our Board of Directors, to offer and issue debt with warrants or debt convertible into shares of our common stock at an exercise or conversion price that will not be less than the fair market value per share. There can be no assurance that these capital resources will be available.
On July 25, 2012, our Board of Directors approved an extension of the stock repurchase plan under the same terms and conditions that allowed us to repurchase up to $35.0 million of our common stock. The stock repurchase plan expired on February 26, 2013 and no shares were repurchased in 2013.
As required by the 1940 Act, our asset coverage must be at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. As of June 30, 2013 our asset coverage ratio under our regulatory requirements as a business development company was 337.2%, excluding our SBA debentures as a result of our exemptive order from the SEC which allows us to exclude all SBA leverage from our asset coverage ratio. As a result of the SEC exemptive order, our ratio of total assets on a consolidated basis to outstanding indebtedness may be less than 200%, which while providing increased investment flexibility, also may increase our exposure to risks associated with leverage. Total leverage when including our SBA debentures was 206.6% at June 30, 2013.
At June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012, we had the following borrowing capacity and outstanding amounts:
Except for the Convertible Senior Notes, all carrying values are the same as the principal amount outstanding.
Represents the aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Convertible Senior Notes less the unaccreted discount initially recorded upon issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes. The total unaccreted discount for the Convertible Senior Notes was $3.0 million at June 30, 2013 and $3.6 million at December 31, 2012.
At June 30, 2013 and at December 31, 2012, the total available borrowings under the SBA was $225.0 million, of which $76.0 million was available in HT II and $149.0 million was available in HT III.
Our net asset value may decline as a result of economic conditions in the United States. Our continued compliance with the covenants under our Credit Facilities, Convertible Senior Notes, 2019 Notes Payable, Asset-Backed Notes and SBA debentures depend on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Material net asset devaluation could have a material adverse effect on our operations and could require us to reduce our borrowings in order to comply with certain covenants, including the ratio of total assets to total indebtedness. We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents, cash generated from operations, and funds available from our Credit Facilities will be sufficient to meet our working capital and capital expenditure commitments for at least the next 12 months.
Debt financing costs are fees and other direct incremental costs we incur in obtaining debt financing and are recognized as prepaid expenses and amortized into the consolidated statement of operations as loan fees over the term of the related debt instrument. Prepaid financing costs, net of accumulated amortization, as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012 were as follows:
SBA Debenture
Convertible Debt
78
Commitments
In the normal course of business, we are party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. These consist primarily of unfunded commitments to extend credit, in the form of loans, to our portfolio companies. Unfunded contractual commitments to provide funds to portfolio companies are not reflected on our balance sheet. Our unfunded contractual commitments may be significant from time to time. As of June 30, 2013, we had unfunded contractual commitments of approximately $169.1 million. Approximately $95.1 million of these unfunded contractual commitments are dependent upon the portfolio company reaching certain milestones before the contractual commitment becomes available. These commitments will be subject to the same underwriting and ongoing portfolio maintenance as are the on-balance sheet financial instruments that we hold. Since these commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amount does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We intend to use cash flow from normal and early principal repayments, and proceeds from borrowings and notes to fund these commitments. However, there can be no assurance that we will have sufficient capital available to fund these commitments as they come due.
In addition, we had approximately $60.0 million of non-binding term sheets outstanding to three new companies, which generally convert to contractual commitments within approximately 45 to 60 days of signing. Non-binding outstanding term sheets are subject to completion of our due diligence and final approval process, as well as the negotiation of definitive documentation with the prospective portfolio companies. Not all non-binding term sheets are expected to close and do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
Contractual Obligations
The following table shows our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited):
We also have a warrant participation agreement with Citigroup. See Note 4.
Certain premises are leased under agreements which expire at various dates through March 2020. Total rent expense amounted to approximately $276,000 and $605,000 during the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, respectively. There was approximately $288,000 and $573,000 recorded in the same periods ended June 30, 2012.
We and our executives and directors are covered by Directors and Officers Insurance, with the directors and officers being indemnified by us to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law subject to the restrictions in the 1940 Act.
Borrowings
On September 27, 2006, HT II received a license to operate as a SBIC under the SBIC program and is able to borrow funds from the SBA against eligible investments and regulatory capital. Under the Small Business Investment Company Act and current SBA policy applicable to SBICs, a SBIC can have outstanding at any time SBA guaranteed debentures up to twice the amount of its regulatory capital. HT II has a total of $76.0 million of SBA guaranteed debentures outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and has paid the SBA commitment fees of approximately $1.5 million. As of June 30, 2013, we held investments in HT II in 46 companies with a fair value of approximately $107.8 million, accounting for approximately 10.4% of our total portfolio at June 30, 2013.
On May 26, 2010, HT III received a license to operate as a SBIC under the SBIC program and is able to borrow funds from the SBA against eligible investments and additional contributions to regulatory capital. With our net investment of $74.5 million in HT III as of June 30, 2013, HT III has the capacity to issue a total of $149.0 million of SBA guaranteed debentures, subject to SBA approval, of which $149.0 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2013, HT III has paid commitment fees of approximately $1.5 million. As of June 30 2013, we held investments in HT III in 38 companies with a fair value of approximately $220.4 million accounting for approximately 21.2% of our total portfolio at June 30, 2013.
79
SBICs are designed to stimulate the flow of private equity capital to eligible small businesses. Under present SBA regulations, eligible small businesses include businesses that have a tangible net worth not exceeding $18.0 million and have average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $6.0 million for the two most recent fiscal years. In addition, SBICs must devote 25.0% of its investment activity to “smaller” concerns as defined by the SBA. A smaller concern is one that has a tangible net worth not exceeding $6.0 million and has average annual fully taxed net income not exceeding $2.0 million for the two most recent fiscal years. SBA regulations also provide alternative size standard criteria to determine eligibility, which depend on the industry in which the business is engaged and are based on such factors as the number of employees and gross sales. According to SBA regulations, SBICs may make long-term loans to small businesses, invest in the equity securities of such businesses and provide them with consulting and advisory services. Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries HT II and HT III, we plan to provide long-term loans to qualifying small businesses, and in connection therewith, make equity investments.
HT II and HT III are periodically examined and audited by the SBA’s staff to determine their compliance with SBA regulations. If HT II or HT III fails to comply with applicable SBA regulations, the SBA could, depending on the severity of the violation, limit or prohibit HT II’s or HT III’s use of debentures, declare outstanding debentures immediately due and payable, and/or limit HT II or HT III from making new investments. In addition, HT II or HT III may also be limited in their ability to make distributions to us if they do not have sufficient capital in accordance with SBA regulations. Such actions by the SBA would, in turn, negatively affect us because HT II and HT III are our wholly owned subsidiaries. HT II and HT III were in compliance with the terms of the SBIC’s leverage as of June 30, 2013 as a result of having sufficient capital as defined under the SBA regulations.
The rates of borrowings under various draws from the SBA beginning in April 2007 are set semiannually in March and September and range from 2.25% to 5.73%. Interest payments on SBA debentures are payable semiannually. There are no principal payments required on these issues prior to maturity and no prepayment penalties. Debentures under the SBA generally mature ten years after being borrowed. Based on the initial draw down date of April 2007, the initial maturity of SBA debentures will occur in April 2017. In addition, the SBA charges a fee that is set annually, depending on the Federal fiscal year the leverage commitment was delegated by the SBA, regardless of the date that the leverage was drawn by the SBIC. The annual fees related to HT II debentures that pooled on September 22, 2010 were 0.406% and 0.285%, depending upon the year in which the underlying commitment was closed. The annual fees related to HT III debentures that pooled on March 27, 2013 were 0.804%. The annual fees on other debentures have been set at 0.906%. The average amount of debentures outstanding for the three-months ended June 30, 2013 for HT II was approximately $76.0 million with an average interest rate of approximately 5.05%. The average amount of debentures outstanding for the three-months ended June 30, 2013 for HT III was approximately $149.0 million with an average interest rate of approximately 3.42%.
In January 2011, we repaid $25.0 million of SBA debentures under HT II, priced at approximately 6.63%, including annual fees. In April 2011, the SBA approved a $25.0 million dollar commitment for HT III. In February 2012, we repaid $24.25 million of SBA debentures under HT II, priced at 6.63%, including annual fees. In June 2012, the SBA approved a $24.25 million dollar commitment for HT III. In August 2012, we repaid $24.75 million of SBA debentures under HT II, $12.0 million priced at 6.43%, including annual fees and $12.75 million priced at 6.38%, including annual fees.
As of June 30, 2013, the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of outstanding SBA guaranteed debentures issued by a single SBIC is $150.0 million, subject to periodic adjustments by the SBA, and a maximum amount of $225.0 million for funds under common control, subject to periodic adjustments by the SBA. In the aggregate, at June 30, 2013 there was $225.0 million principal amount of indebtedness outstanding incurred by our SBIC subsidiaries, bringing us to the maximum statutory limit on the dollar amount of SBA guaranteed debentures under the SBIC program.
We reported the following SBA debentures outstanding as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012:
Interest rate includes annual charge
80
In August 2008, we entered into a $50.0 million two-year revolving senior secured credit facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance (the “Wells Facility”). On June 20, 2011, we renewed the Wells Facility. Under this three-year senior secured facility, Wells Fargo Capital Finance has made commitments of $75.0 million. The facility contains an accordion feature, in which we can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $300.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Wells Fargo Capital Finance and subject to other customary conditions. We expect to continue discussions with various other potential lenders to join the new facility; however, there can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the Wells Facility.
On August 1, 2012, we entered into an amendment to the Wells Facility. The amendment reduces the interest rate floor by 75 basis points to 4.25% and extends the maturity date by one year to August 2015. Additionally, an amortization period of 12 months was added to pay down the principal balance as of the maturity date, and the unused line fee was reduced.
Borrowings under the Wells Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 3.50%, with a floor of 4.25% and an advance rate of 50% against eligible loans. The Wells Facility is secured by loans in the borrowing base. The Wells Facility requires payment of a non-use fee on a scale of 0.0% to 0.50% of the average monthly outstanding balance. The monthly payment of a non-use fee thereafter shall depend on the average balance that was outstanding on a scale between 0.0% and 0.50%. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, this non-use fee was approximately $95,000. On June 20, 2011 we paid an additional $1.1 million in structuring fees in connection with the Wells Facility which is being amortized through the end of the term. At June 30, 2013, there were no borrowings outstanding on this facility.
The Wells Facility includes various financial and operating covenants applicable to us and our subsidiaries, in addition to those applicable to Hercules Funding II, LLC. These covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding subordinated indebtedness, that is in excess of $362.0 million plus 90% of the cumulative amount of equity raised after June 30, 2012. In addition, the tangible net worth covenant will increase by 90 cents on the dollar for every dollar of equity capital that we subsequently raise. As of June 30, 2013, the minimum tangible net worth covenant has increased to $478.5 million as a result of the October 2012 follow-on public offering of 3.1 million shares of common stock for proceeds of approximately $33.6 million and the March 2013 follow-on public offering of 8.1 million shares of common stock for proceeds of approximately $95.8 million. The Wells Facility provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. We were in compliance with all covenants at June 30, 2013.
On February 10, 2010, we entered a $20.0 million one-year revolving senior secured credit facility with Union Bank (the “Union Bank Facility”). On November 2, 2011, we renewed and amended the Union Bank Facility and added a new lender under the Union Bank Facility. Union Bank and RBC Capital Markets (“RBC”) have made commitments of $30.0 million and $25.0 million, respectively. The Union Bank Facility contains an accordion feature, in which we can increase the credit line up to an aggregate of $150.0 million, funded by additional lenders and with the agreement of Union Bank and subject to other customary conditions. We expect to continue discussions with various other potential lenders to join the new facility; however, there can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the Union Bank Facility.
On March 30, 2012 we entered into an amendment to the Union Bank Facility which permitted us to issue additional senior notes relating to the offer and sale of our 2019 Notes. On September 17, 2012, we entered into an amendment to the Union Bank Facility. Pursuant to the terms of the amendment, we are permitted to increase our unsecured indebtedness by an aggregate original principal amount not to exceed $200.0 million incurred after March 30, 2012 in one or more issuances, provided certain conditions are satisfied for each issuance.
On December 17, 2012, we further amended the Union Bank Facility to remove RBC from the Union Bank Facility. Following the removal of RBC, the Union Bank Facility consists solely of Union Bank’s commitment of $30.0 million. In connection with the amendment, the maximum availability under the Union Bank Facility, subject to a borrowing base, was reduced from $55.0 million to $30.0 million. The Union Bank Facility contains an accordion feature, in which we could increase the credit line by up to $95.0 million in the aggregate, funded by commitments from additional lenders and with the agreement of Union Bank and subject to other customary conditions. There can be no assurances that additional lenders will join the Union Bank Facility.
Borrowings under the Union Bank Facility will generally bear interest at a rate per annum equal to LIBOR plus 2.25% with a floor of 4.0%. The Union Bank Facility requires the payment of a non-use fee of 0.50% annually. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2013, this nonuse fee was approximately $38,000. The Union Bank Facility is collateralized by debt investments in our portfolio companies, and includes an advance rate equal to 50.0% of eligible loans placed in the collateral pool. The Union Bank Facility generally requires payment of interest on a monthly basis. All outstanding principal is due upon maturity. At June 30, 2013 there were no borrowings outstanding on this facility.
81
The Union Bank Facility requires various financial and operating covenants. These covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum tangible net worth in an amount, when added to outstanding subordinated indebtedness, that is in excess of $314.0 million plus 90% of the amount of net cash proceeds received from the sale of common stock after March 31, 2011. As of June 30, 2013, the minimum tangible net worth covenant has increased to $472.8 million as a result of the January and October 2012 follow-on public offerings of 5.0 and 3.1 million shares of common stock, respectively, for total net proceeds of approximately $80.9 million and the March 2013 follow-on public offering of 8.1 million shares of common stock for total net proceeds of approximately $95.6 million. The Union Bank Facility will mature on November 1, 2014, approximately three years from the date of issuance, revolving through the first 24 months with a term out provision for the remaining 12 months. Union Bank Facility also provides for customary events of default, including, but not limited to, payment defaults, breach of representations or covenants, bankruptcy events and change of control. We were in compliance with all covenants at June 30, 2013.
We, through Hercules Funding Trust I, an affiliated statutory trust, had a securitized credit facility (the “Citibank Credit Facility”) with Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. which expired under normal terms. During the first quarter of 2009, we paid off all principal and interest owed under the Citibank Credit Facility. Citigroup has an equity participation right through a warrant participation agreement on the pool of loans and warrants collateralized under the Citibank Credit Facility. Pursuant to the warrant participation agreement, we granted to Citigroup a 10% participation in all warrants held as collateral. However, no additional warrants were included in collateral subsequent to the facility amendment on May 2, 2007. As a result, Citigroup is entitled to 10% of the realized gains on the warrants until the realized gains paid to Citigroup pursuant to the agreement equal $3,750,000 (the “Maximum Participation Limit”). The obligations under the warrant participation agreement continue even after the Citibank Credit Facility is terminated until the Maximum Participation Limit has been reached.
During the six-months ended June 30, 2013, we reduced our realized gain by approximately $207,000 for Citigroup’s participation in the gain on sale of equity securities which were obtained from exercising a portfolio company warrant which was included in the collateral pool. We recorded a decrease on participation liability and an increase on unrealized appreciation by a net amount of approximately $98,000 as a result of current quarter depreciation of fair value on the pool of warrants collateralized under the warrant participation agreement. The value of their participation right on unrealized gains in the related equity investments was approximately $215,000 as of June 30, 2013 and is included in accrued liabilities. There can be no assurances that the unrealized appreciation of the warrants will not be higher or lower in future periods due to fluctuations in the value of the warrants, thereby increasing or reducing the effect on the cost of borrowing. Since inception of the agreement, we have paid Citigroup approximately $1.6 million under the warrant participation agreement thereby reducing our realized gains by this amount. We will continue to pay Citigroup under the warrant participation agreement until the Maximum Participation Limit is reached or the warrants expire. Warrants subject to the Citigroup participation agreement are set to expire between April 2013 and January 2017.
In April 2011, we issued $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.00% convertible senior notes (the “Convertible Senior Notes”) due 2016. As of June 30, 2013, the carrying value of the Convertible Senior Notes, comprised of the aggregate principal amount outstanding less the unaccreted discount initially recorded upon issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes, is approximately $72.0 million.
The Convertible Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2016 (the “Maturity Date”), unless previously converted or repurchased in accordance with their terms. The Convertible Senior Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.00% per year payable semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing on October 15, 2011. The Convertible Senior Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to our existing and future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Convertible Senior Notes; equal in right of payment to our existing and future unsecured indebtedness that is not so subordinated; effectively junior in right of payment to any of our secured indebtedness (including unsecured indebtedness that we later secure) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all existing and future indebtedness (including trade payables) incurred by our subsidiaries, financing vehicles or similar facilities.
Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding October 15, 2015, holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes only under certain circumstances set forth in the Indenture. On or after October 15, 2015 until the close of business on the scheduled trading day immediately preceding the Maturity Date, holders may convert their Convertible Senior Notes at any time. Upon conversion, we will pay or deliver, as the case may be, at our election, cash, shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. The conversion rate will initially be 84.0972 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Senior Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $11.89 per share of common stock). The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment in some events but will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, if certain corporate events occur prior to the Maturity Date, the conversion rate will be increased for converting holders.
82
We may not redeem the Convertible Senior Notes prior to maturity. No sinking fund is provided for the Convertible Senior Notes. In addition, if certain corporate events occur, holders of the Convertible Senior Notes may require us to repurchase for cash all or part of their Convertible Senior Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest through, but excluding, the required repurchase date.
In accounting for the Convertible Senior Notes, we estimated that the values of the debt and the embedded conversion feature of the Convertible Senior Notes were approximately 92.8% and 7.2%, respectively. The original issue discount of 7.2% attributable to the conversion feature of the Convertible Senior Notes has initially been recorded in “capital in excess of par value” in the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities. As a result, we record interest expense comprised of both stated interest expense as well as accretion of the original issue discount resulting in an estimated effective interest rate of approximately 7.9%
For the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited), the components of interest expense, fees and cash paid for interest expense for the Convertible Senior Notes were as follows:
As of June 30, 2013, we are in compliance with the terms of the indentures governing the Convertible Senior Notes. See Note to our consolidated financial statements for more detail on the Convertible Senior Notes.
On March 6, 2012, we and U.S. Bank National Association (the “Trustee”) entered into an indenture (the “Base Indenture”). On April 17, 2012, we and the Trustee entered into the First Supplemental Indenture to the Base Indenture (the “First Supplemental Indenture”), dated April 17, 2012, relating to our issuance, offer and sale of $43.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.00% senior notes due 2019 (the “April 2019 Notes”). The sale of the April 2019 Notes generated net proceeds, before expenses, of approximately $41.7 million.
On September 24, 2012, we and the Trustee, entered into the Second Supplemental Indenture to the Base Indenture (the “Second Supplemental Indenture”), dated as of September 24, 2012, relating to our issuance, offer and sale of $75.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.00% senior notes due 2019 (the “September 2019 Notes” and, together with the April 2019 Notes, the “2019 Notes”). The sale of the September 2019 Notes generated net proceeds, before expenses, of approximately $72.75 million.
The April 2019 Notes will mature on April 30, 2019 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at our option at any time or from time to time on or after April 30, 2015, upon not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days written notice by mail prior to the date fixed for redemption thereof, at a redemption price of 100% of the outstanding principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest payments otherwise payable for the then-current quarterly interest period accrued to but not including the date fixed for redemption. The April 2019 Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.00% per year payable quarterly on January 30, April 30, July 30 and October 30 of each year, commencing on July 30, 2012, and trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “HTGZ.”
83
The April 2019 Notes are our direct unsecured obligations and rank: (i) pari passuwith our other outstanding and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including without limitation, the $75.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes; (ii) senior to any of our future indebtedness that expressly provides it is subordinated to the April 2019 Notes; (iii) effectively subordinated to all our existing and future secured indebtedness (including indebtedness that is initially unsecured to which we subsequently grant security), to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, including without limitation, borrowings under our Credit Facilities; (iv) structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations of any of our subsidiaries, including without limitation, the indebtedness of Hercules Technology II, L.P. and Hercules Technology III, L.P. and borrowings under our revolving senior secured credit facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC.
The Base Indenture, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture, contains certain covenants including covenants requiring our compliance with (regardless of whether it is subject to) the asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 18(a)(1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act to comply with the restrictions on dividends, distributions and purchase of capital stock set forth in Section 18(a)(1)(B) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act and to provide financial information to the holders of the April 2019 Notes and the Trustee if we should no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the Indenture, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture. The Indenture provides for customary events of default and further provides that the Trustee or the holders of 25% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding April 2019 Notes in a series may declare such April 2019 Notes immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any event of default after expiration of any applicable grace period.
In July 2012, we reopened our April 2019 Notes and issued an additional $41.5 million in aggregate principal amount of April 2019 Notes, which includes exercise of an over-allotment option, bringing the total amount of the April 2019 Notes issued to approximately $84.5 million in aggregate principal amount.
The September 2019 Notes will mature on September 30, 2019 and may be redeemed in whole or in part at our option at any time or from time to time on or after September 30, 2015, upon not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days written notice by mail prior to the date fixed for redemption thereof, at a redemption price of 100% of the outstanding principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest payments otherwise payable for the then-current quarterly interest period accrued to but not including the date fixed for redemption. The September 2019 Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.00% per year payable quarterly on March 30, June 30, September 30 and December 30 of each year, commencing on December 30, 2012, and trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “HTGY.”
The September 2019 Notes are our direct unsecured obligations and rank: (i) pari passu with our other outstanding and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including without limitation, the $75 million in aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes; (ii) senior to any of our future indebtedness that expressly provides it is subordinated to the September 2019 Notes; (iii) effectively subordinated to all our existing and future secured indebtedness (including indebtedness that is initially unsecured to which we subsequently grant security), to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, including without limitation, borrowings under our credit facilities; (iv) structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations of any of our subsidiaries, including without limitation, the indebtedness of Hercules Technology II, L.P. and Hercules Technology III, L.P. and borrowings under our revolving senior secured credit facility with Wells Fargo Capital Finance.
The Base Indenture, as supplemented by the Second Supplemental Indenture, contains certain covenants including covenants requiring us to comply with (regardless of whether it is subject to) the asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 18 (a)(1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act to comply with the restrictions on dividends, distributions and purchase of capital stock set forth in Section 18(a)(1)(B) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act and to provide financial information to the holders of the September 2019 Notes and the Trustee if we should no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These covenants are subject to important limitations and exceptions that are described in the Indenture, as supplemented by the Second Supplemental Indenture. The Indenture provides for customary events of default and further provides that the Trustee or the holders of 25% in aggregate principal amount of the outstanding September 2019 Notes in a series may declare such September 2019 Notes immediately due and payable upon the occurrence of any event of default after expiration of any applicable grace period.
84
For the three and six-months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited), the components of interest expense and cash paid for interest expense for the April 2019 Notes and September 2019 Notes are as follows:
As of June 30, 2013, we are in compliance with the terms of the indenture governing the 2019 Notes. See Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for more detail on the 2019 Notes.
On December 19, 2012, we completed a $230.7 million term debt securitization in connection with which an affiliate of ours made an offering of $129.3 million in aggregate principal amount of fixed-rate asset-backed notes (the “Asset-Backed Notes”), which Asset-Backed Notes were rated A2(sf) by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. The Asset-Backed Notes were issued by Hercules Capital Funding Trust 2012-1 pursuant to a note purchase agreement, dated as of December 12, 2012, by and among us, Hercules Capital Funding 2012-1 LLC, as Trust Depositor (the “Trust Depositor”), Hercules Capital Funding Trust 2012-1, as Issuer (the “Issuer”), and Guggenheim Securities, LLC, as Initial Purchaser, and are backed by a pool of senior loans made to certain of our portfolio companies and secured by certain assets of those portfolio companies and are to be serviced by us. Interest on the Asset-Backed Notes will be paid, to the extent of funds available, at a fixed rate of 3.32% per annum. The Asset-Backed Notes have a stated maturity of December 16, 2017.
As part of this transaction, we entered into a sale and contribution agreement with the Trust Depositor under which we have agreed to sell or have contributed to the Trust Depositor certain senior loans made to certain of our portfolio companies (the “Loans”). We have made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the sale and contribution agreement with respect to the Loans as of the date of their transfer to the Trust Depositor.
In connection with the issuance and sale of the Asset-Backed Notes, we have made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the note purchase agreement. The Asset-Backed Notes are secured obligations of the Issuer and are non-recourse to us. The Issuer also entered into an indenture governing the Asset-Backed Notes, which indenture includes customary representations, warranties and covenants. The Asset-Backed Notes were sold without being registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), to “qualified institutional buyers” in compliance with the exemption from registration provided by Rule 144A under the Securities Act and to institutional “accredited investors” (as defined in Rule 501(a)(1), (2), (3) or (7) under the Securities Act) who in each case, are “qualified purchasers” for purposes of Section 3(c)(7) under the 1940 Act. In addition, the Trust Depositor entered into an amended and restated trust agreement, which includes customary representation, warranties and covenants.
The Loans are serviced by us pursuant to a sale and servicing agreement, which contains customary representations, warranties and covenants. We perform certain servicing and administrative functions with respect to the Loans. We are entitled to receive a monthly fee from the Issuer for servicing the Loans. This servicing fee equals the product of one-twelfth (or in the case of the first payment date, a fraction equal to the number of days from and including December 5, 2012 through and including January 15, 2013 over 360) of 2.00% and the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the Loans, excluding all defaulted Loans and all purchased Loans, as of the first day of the related collection period (the period from the 5th day of the immediately preceding calendar month through the 4th day of the calendar month in which a payment date occurs, and for the first payment date, the period from and including December 5, 2012, to the close of business on January 4, 2013).
We also serve as administrator to the Issuer under an administration agreement, which includes customary representations, warranties and covenants.
At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Asset-Backed Notes had an outstanding balance of $110.3 million and $129.3 million, respectively.
85
Under the terms of the Asset Backed Notes, we are required to maintain a reserve cash balance, funded through interest and principal collections from the underlying securitized debt portfolio, which may be used to pay monthly interest and principal payments on the Asset-Backed Notes. We have segregated these funds and classified them as Restricted Cash. There was approximately $1.7 million of Restricted Cash as of June 30, 2013 funded through interest collections. There was no cash segregated at December 31, 2012 due to immaterial monthly interest collections for the period ended December 31, 2012.
Dividends
The following table summarizes our dividends declared and paid or to be paid on all shares, including restricted stock, to date:
Date Declared
Record Date
Payment Date
October 27, 2005
December 9, 2005
April 3, 2006
July 19, 2006
October 16, 2006
February 7, 2007
May 3, 2007
August 2, 2007
November 1, 2007
February 7, 2008
May 8, 2008
August 7, 2008
November 6, 2008
February 12, 2009
May 7, 2009
August 6, 2009
October 15, 2009
December 16, 2009
February 11, 2010
May 3, 2010
August 2, 2010
November 4, 2010
March 1, 2011
May 5, 2011
August 4, 2011
November 3, 2011
February 27, 2012
April 30, 2012
July 30, 2012
October 26, 2012
February 26, 2013
April 29, 2013
July 29, 2013
86
On July 29, 2013 the Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend $0.01, or approximately 3.7%, and declared a cash dividend of $0.28 per share that is to be paid on August 20, 2013 to shareholders of record as of August 13, 2013. This dividend is our thirty-second consecutive quarterly dividend declaration since our initial public offering, and will bring the total cumulative dividend declared to date to $8.44 per share.
Our Board of Directors maintains a variable dividend policy with the objective of distributing four quarterly distributions in an amount that approximates 90 - 100% of our taxable quarterly income or potential annual income for a particular year. In addition, at the end of the year, we may also pay an additional special dividend or fifth dividend, such that we may distribute approximately all of our annual taxable income in the year it was earned, while maintaining the option to spill over our excess taxable income.
Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would generally be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain. The determination of the tax attributes of our distributions is made annually as of the end of our fiscal year based upon our taxable income for the full year and distributions paid for the full year. Of the dividends declared during the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, 100% were distributions of ordinary income. There can be no certainty to stockholders that this determination is representative of what the tax attributes of our 2013 distributions to stockholders will actually be.
Each year a statement on Form 1099-DIV identifying the source of the distribution (i.e., paid from ordinary income, paid from net capital gains on the sale of securities, and/or a return of paid-in-capital surplus which is a nontaxable distribution) is mailed to our stockholders. To the extent our taxable earnings fall below the total amount of our distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to our stockholders.
We operate to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under the Code. Generally, a RIC is entitled to deduct dividends it pays to its shareholders from its income to determine “taxable income.” Taxable income includes our taxable interest, dividend and fee income, as well as taxable net capital gains. Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses, and generally excludes net unrealized appreciation or depreciation, as gains or losses are not included in taxable income until they are realized. In addition, gains realized for financial reporting purposes may differ from gains included in taxable income as a result of our election to recognize gains using installment sale treatment, which generally results in the deferment of gains for tax purposes until notes or other amounts, including amounts held in escrow, received as consideration from the sale of investments are collected in cash. Taxable income includes non-cash income, such as changes in accrued and reinvested interest and dividends, which includes contractual payment-in-kind interest, and the amortization of discounts and fees. Cash collections of income resulting from contractual PIK interest or the amortization of discounts and fees generally occur upon the repayment of the loans or debt securities that include such items. Non-cash taxable income is reduced by non-cash expenses, such as realized losses and depreciation and amortization expense.
As a RIC, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible federal excise tax on certain undistributed income unless the we distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of our ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.2% of our capital gain net income for the 1-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income realized, but not distributed, in the preceding year (the “Excise Tax Avoidance Requirements”). We will not be subject to excise taxes on amounts on which we are required to pay corporate income tax (such as retained net capital gains). Depending on the level of taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry over taxable income in excess of current year distributions from such taxable income into the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income, as required. The maximum amount of excess taxable income that may be carried over for distribution in the next year under the Code is the total amount of dividends paid in the following year, subject to certain declaration and payment guidelines. To the extent we choose to carry over taxable income into the next tax year, dividends declared and paid by us in a year may differ from taxable income for that year as such dividends may include the distribution of current year taxable income, the distribution of prior year taxable income carried over into and distributed in the current year, or returns of capital.
We can offer no assurance that we will achieve results that will permit the payment of any cash distributions and, if we issue senior securities, we will be prohibited from making distributions if doing so causes us to fail to maintain the asset coverage ratios stipulated by the 1940 Act or if distributions are limited by the terms of any of our borrowings. Our ability to make distributions will be limited by the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act.
We intend to distribute approximately $1.5 million of spillover earnings from the year ended December 31, 2012 to our shareholders in 2013.
We maintain an “opt-out” dividend reinvestment plan for our common stockholders. As a result, if we declare a dividend, cash dividends will be automatically reinvested in additional shares of our common stock unless the stockholder specifically “opts out” of the dividend reinvestment plan and chooses to receive cash dividends.
87
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the period reported. On an ongoing basis, our management evaluates its estimates and assumptions, which are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Changes in our estimates and assumptions could materially impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Valuation of Portfolio Investments
The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements is the valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments recorded.
Our investments are carried at fair value in accordance with the 1940 Act and Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. At June 30, 2013, approximately 86.0% of our total assets represented investments in portfolio companies that are valued at fair value by the Board of Directors. Value, as defined in Section 2(a)(41) of the 1940 Act, is (i) the market price for those securities for which a market quotation is readily available and (ii) for all other securities and assets, fair value is as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors. Our debt securities are primarily invested in venture capital-backed companies in technology-related markets, including technology, biotechnology, life science and clean technology industries. Given the nature of lending to these types of businesses, our investments in these portfolio companies are generally considered Level 3 assets under ASC 820 because there is no known or accessible market or market indexes for these investment securities to be traded or exchanged. As such, it values substantially all of its investments at fair value as determined in good faith pursuant to a consistent valuation policy and our Board of Directors in accordance with the provisions of ASC 820 and the 1940 Act. Due to the inherent uncertainty in determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments determined in good faith by our Board may differ significantly from the value that would have been used had a readily available market existed for such investments, and the differences could be material.
Our Board of Directors may from time to time engage an independent valuation firm to provide us with valuation assistance with respect to certain of our portfolio investments on a quarterly basis. We intend to continue to engage an independent valuation firm to provide us with assistance regarding our determination of the fair value of selected portfolio investments each quarter unless directed by the Board of Directors to cancel such valuation services. The scope of the services rendered by an independent valuation firm is at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors is ultimately and solely responsible for determining the fair value of our investments in good faith.
With respect to investments for which market quotations are not readily available or when such market quotations are deemed not to represent fair value, our Board of Directors has approved a multi-step valuation process each quarter, as described below:
(1) our quarterly valuation process begins with each portfolio company or investment being initially valued by the investment professionals responsible for the portfolio investment;
(2) preliminary valuation conclusions are then documented and business based assumptions are discussed with our investment committee;
(3) the valuation committee of the Board of Directors reviews the preliminary valuation of the investment committee which incorporates the results of the independent valuation firm as appropriate.
88
We have categorized all investments recorded at fair value in accordance with ASC 820 based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair value. Hierarchical levels, defined by ASC 820 and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities, are as follows:
In accordance with ASU 2011-04, the following table provides quantitative information about our Level 3 fair value measurements of our investments as of June 30, 2013. In addition to the techniques and inputs noted in the table below, according to our valuation policy we may also use other valuation techniques and methodologies when determining our fair value measurements. The below table is not intended to be all-inclusive, but rather provides information on the significant Level 3 inputs as they relate to our fair value measurements.
Pharmaceuticals, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Specialty Pharmaceuticals, Drug Discovery and Development, Drug Delivery, and Diagnostics and Biotechnology industries in the Schedule of Investments.
Technology, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Software, Semiconductors, Electronics and Computer Hardware, Internet Consumer and Business Services, Information Services, Media/Content/Info and Communications and Networking industries in the Schedule of Investments.
Lower Middle Market, above, is comprised of debt investments in the Communications and Networking, Software, Electronics and Computer Hardware, Information Services, Internet Consumer and Business Services, Media/Content/Info, and Specialty Pharmaceuticals industries in the Schedule of Investments.
89
Clean Tech, above, aligns with the Clean Tech industry in the Schedule of Investments.
Unobservable Input(a)
90
We follow the guidance set forth in ASC 820 which establishes a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities and outlines a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measures on earnings. Our debt securities are primarily invested in venture capital-backed companies in technology-related markets, including technology, biotechnology, life science and clean-technology industries at all stages of development. Given the nature of lending to these types of businesses, our investments in these portfolio companies are considered Level 3 assets under ASC 820 because there is no known or accessible market or market indexes for these investment securities to be traded or exchanged.
In making a good faith determination of the value of our investments, we generally start with the cost basis of the investment, which includes the value attributed to the OID, if any, and PIK interest which has been accrued to principal as earned. We then apply the valuation methods as set forth below.
We apply a procedure for debt investments that assumes a sale of investment in a hypothetical market to a hypothetical market participant where buyers and sellers are willing participants. The hypothetical market does not include scenarios where the underlying security was simply repaid or extinguished, but includes an exit concept. Under this process, we also evaluate the collateral for recoverability of the debt investments as well as apply all of its historical fair value analysis. We use pricing on recently issued comparable debt securities to determine the baseline hypothetical market yields as of the measurement date. We consider each portfolio company’s credit rating, security liens and other characteristics of the investment to adjust the baseline yield to derive a hypothetical yield for each investment as of the measurement date. The anticipated future cash flows from each investment are then discounted at the hypothetical yield to estimate each investment’s fair value as of the measurement date.
Our process includes, among other things, the underlying investment performance, the current portfolio company’s financial condition and market changing events that impact valuation, estimated remaining life, current market yield and interest rate spreads of similar securities as of the measurement date. We value our syndicated loans using broker quotes and bond indices amongst other factors. If there is a significant deterioration of the credit quality of a debt investment, we may consider other factors than those a hypothetical market participant would use to estimate fair value, including the proceeds that would be received in a liquidation analysis.
We record unrealized depreciation on investments when we believe that an investment has decreased in value, including where collection of a loan is doubtful or if under the in exchange premise when the value of a debt security were to be less than amortized cost of the investment. Conversely, where appropriate, we record unrealized appreciation if we believe that the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and, therefore, that our investment has also appreciated in value or if under the in exchange premise the value of a debt security were to be greater than amortized cost.
When originating a debt instrument, we generally receive warrants or other equity-related securities from the borrower. We determine the cost basis of the warrants or other equity-related securities received based upon their respective fair values on the date of receipt in proportion to the total fair value of the debt and warrants or other equity-related securities received. Any resulting discount on the loan from recordation of the warrant or other equity instruments is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan.
Securities that are traded in the over-the-counter markets or on a stock exchange will be valued at the prevailing bid price at period end. We have a limited number of equity securities in public companies. In accordance with the 1940 Act, unrestricted publicly traded securities for which market quotations are readily available are valued at the closing market quote on the measurement date.
We estimate the fair value of warrants using a Black Scholes pricing model. At each reporting date, privately held warrant and equity related securities are valued based on an analysis of various factors including, but not limited to, the portfolio company’s operating performance and financial condition and general market conditions, price to enterprise value or price to equity ratios, discounted cash flow, valuation comparisons to comparable public companies or other industry benchmarks. When an external event occurs, such as a purchase transaction, public offering, or subsequent equity sale, the pricing indicated by that external event is utilized to corroborate our valuation of the warrant and equity related securities. We periodically review the valuation of our portfolio companies that have not been involved in a qualifying external event to determine if the enterprise value of the portfolio company may have increased or decreased since the last valuation measurement date.
91
Income Recognition.
We record interest income on the accrual basis and we recognize it as earned in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected. Original Issue Discount (“OID”) initially represents the value of detachable equity warrants obtained in conjunction with the acquisition of debt securities and is accreted into interest income over the term of the loan as a yield enhancement. When a loan becomes 90 days or more past due, or if management otherwise does not expect the portfolio company to be able to service its debt and other obligations, we will generally place the loan on non-accrual status and cease recognizing interest income on that loan until all principal has been paid. Any uncollected interest related to prior periods is reversed from income in the period that collection of the interest receivable is determined to be doubtful. However, we may make exceptions to this policy if the investment has sufficient collateral value and is in the process of collection. At June 30, 2013, we had two loans on non-accrual, one with a fair value of approximately $5.5 million and the other with no fair market value compared to one loan at December 31, 2012 with no fair market value.
Paid-In-Kind and End of Term Income.
Contractual paid-in-kind (“PIK”) interest, which represents contractually deferred interest added to the loan balance that is generally due at the end of the loan term, is generally recorded on the accrual basis to the extent such amounts are expected to be collected. We will generally cease accruing PIK interest if there is insufficient value to support the accrual or we do not expect the portfolio company to be able to pay all principal and interest due. In addition, we may also be entitled to an end-of-term payment that we amortize into income over the life of the loan. To maintain our status as a RIC, PIK and end-of-term income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends even though we have not yet collected the cash. Amounts necessary to pay these dividends may come from available cash or the liquidation of certain investments. We recorded approximately $983,000 and $1.8 million in PIK income in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2013, respectively. The Company recorded approximately $271,000 and $569,000 in PIK income in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012, respectively.
Fee Income.
Fee income, generally collected in advance, includes loan commitment and facility fees for due diligence and structuring, as well as fees for transaction services and management services rendered by us to portfolio companies and other third parties. Loan and commitment fees are amortized into income over the contractual life of the loan. Management fees are generally recognized as income when the services are rendered. Loan origination fees are capitalized and then amortized into interest income using the effective interest rate method. In certain loan arrangements, warrants or other equity interests are received from the borrower as additional origination fees.
We recognize nonrecurring fees amortized over the remaining term of the loan commencing in the quarter relating to specific loan modifications. Certain fees may still be recognized as one-time fees, including prepayment penalties, fees related to select covenant default waiver fees and acceleration of previously deferred loan fees and original issue discount (OID) related to early loan pay-off or material modification of the specific debt outstanding.
Equity Offering Expenses
Our offering costs are charged against the proceeds from equity offerings when received.
Debt Issuance Costs
Debt issuance costs are being amortized over the life of the related debt instrument using the straight line method, which closely approximates the effective yield method.
Stock-Based Compensation.
We have issued and may, from time to time, issue additional stock options and restricted stock to employees under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and Board members under our 2006 Equity Incentive Plan. We follow ASC 718, formally known as FAS 123R “Share-Based Payments” to account for stock options granted. Under ASC 718, compensation expense associated with stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the vesting period.
92
Federal Income Taxes.
We intend to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, as such, will not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of our taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify as a RIC, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code. We are subject to a non-deductible federal excise tax if we do not distribute at least 98% of our taxable income and 98.2% of our capital gain net income for each one year period ending on October 31. At December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, no excise tax was recorded. We intend to distribute approximately $1.5 million of spillover earnings from the year ended December 31, 2012 to our shareholders in 2013. Because federal income tax regulations differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment income and realized gains recognized for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statement to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain or loss are recognized at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-08, “Financial Services – Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements,” which amends the criteria that define an investment company and clarifies the measurement guidance and requires new disclosures for investment companies. Under ASU 2013-08, an entity already regulated under the 1940 Act is automatically an investment company under the new GAAP definition, so we anticipate no impacts from adopting this standard on our statement of assets and liabilities or results of operations. We are currently assessing the additional disclosure requirements. ASU 2013-08 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2013.
Subsequent Events
On July 29, 2013 the Board of Directors increased the quarterly dividend by $0.01, or approximately 3.7%, and declared a cash dividend of $0.28 per share to be paid on August 20, 2013 to shareholders of record as of August 13, 2013. This dividend would represent our thirty-second consecutive dividend declaration since our initial public offering, bringing the total cumulative dividend declared to date to $8.44 per share.
Closed and Pending Commitments
As of July 29, 2013, Hercules has:
The table below summarizes our year-to-date closed and pending commitments as follows:
Closed Commitments and Pending Commitments (in millions)
January 1 – June 30, 2013 Closed Commitments
Q3-13 Closed Commitments (as of July 29, 2013)
Total Year-to-date 2013 Closed Commitments(a)
Pending Commitments (as of July 29, 2013)(b)
Year-to-date 2013 Closed and Pending Commitments
Notes:
93
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk is defined as the sensitivity of our current and future earnings to interest rate volatility, variability of spread relationships, the difference in re-pricing intervals between our assets and liabilities and the effect that interest rates may have on our cash flows. Changes in interest rates may affect both our cost of funding and our interest income from portfolio investments, cash and cash equivalents and idle funds investments. Our investment income will be affected by changes in various interest rates, including LIBOR and prime rates, to the extent our debt investments include variable interest rates. As of June 30, 2013, approximately 98.1% of the loans in our portfolio had variable rates based on floating Prime or LIBOR, or variable rates with a floor. Changes in interest rates can also affect, among other things, our ability to acquire and originate loans and securities and the value of our investment portfolio.
Based on our Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of June 30, 2013, the following table shows the approximate annualized increase (decrease) in components of net assets resulting from operations of hypothetical base rate changes in interest rates, assuming no changes in our investments and borrowings.
Basis point increase(1)
100
200
300
400
500
We do not currently engage in any hedging activities. However, we may, in the future, hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options, and forward contracts. While hedging activities may insulate us against changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to our borrowed funds and higher interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2013, we did not engage in interest rate hedging activities.
Although we believe that the foregoing analysis is indicative of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, it does not adjust for potential changes in the credit market, credit quality, size and composition of the assets in our portfolio, and other business developments, including borrowings under our Credit Facilities, SBA debentures, Convertible Senior Notes, 2019 Notes and Asset-Based Notes, that could affect the net increase in net assets resulting from operations, or net income. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the statement above.
Because we currently borrow, and plan to borrow in the future, money to make investments, our net investment income is dependent upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the rate at which we invest the funds borrowed. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment income. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds would increase, which could reduce our net investment income if there is not a corresponding increase in interest income generated by variable rate assets in our investment portfolio.
For additional information regarding the interest rate associated with each of our Credit Facilities, SBA debentures, Convertible Senior Notes, 2019 Notes and Asset-Based Notes, please refer to “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources – Outstanding Borrowings” in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
94
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our chief executive and chief financial officers, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our chief executive and chief financial officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive and chief financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no other changes in our internal control over financing reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
95
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
We may, from time to time, be involved in litigation arising out of our operations in the normal course of business or otherwise. Furthermore, third parties may try to seek to impose liability on us in connection with the activities of our portfolio companies. While the outcome of any current legal proceedings cannot at this time be predicted with certainty, we do not expect any current matters will materially affect our financial condition or results of operations; however, there can be no assurance whether any pending legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations in any future reporting period.
In addition to the risks discussed below, important risk factors that could cause results or events to differ from current expectations are described in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2013.
96
Our financial results could be negatively affected if a significant portfolio investment fails to perform as expected.
Our total investment in companies may be significant individually or in the aggregate. As a result, if a significant investment in one or more companies fails to perform as expected, our financial results could be more negatively affected and the magnitude of the loss could be more significant than if we had made smaller investments in more companies. The following table shows the fair value of the totals of investments held in portfolio companies at June 30, 2013 (unaudited) that represent greater than 5% of net assets:
Box, Inc. is an online storage and sharing service that gives users access to their files from anywhere.
Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a biopharmaceutical company discovering, developing and preparing to commercialize innovative medicines paired with companion diagnostics for the treatment of serious diseases, with an initial focus on cancer.
Brightsource Energy, Inc. designs, develops and sells solar thermal power systems that deliver reliable, clean energy to utilities and industrial companies.
Jab Wireless, Inc. is engaged in the acquisition and expansion of wireless broadband operators, bundles voice and data services.
Our financial results could be materially adversely affected if these portfolio companies or any of our other significant portfolio companies encounter financial difficulty and fail to repay their obligations or to perform as expected.
Investing in publicly traded companies can involve a high degree of risk and can be speculative.
We have invested, and expect to continue to invest, a portion of our portfolio in publicly traded companies or companies that are in the process of completing their initial public offering, or IPO. As publicly traded companies, the securities of these companies may not trade at high volumes, and prices can be volatile, which may restrict our ability to sell our positions and may have a material impact on us.
It is likely that the terms of any current or future long-term or revolving credit or warehouse facility we may enter into in the future could constrain our ability to grow our business.
Under our borrowings and Credit Facilities, current lenders have, and any future lender or lenders may have, fixed dollar claims on our assets that are senior to the claims of our stockholders and, thus, will have a preference over our stockholders with respect to our assets in the collateral pool. Our Credit Facilities and borrowings also subject us to various financial and operating covenants, including, but not limited to, maintaining certain financial ratios and minimum tangible net worth amounts. Future credit facilities and borrowings will likely subject us to similar or additional covenants. In addition, we may grant a securities interest in our assets in connection with any such credit facilities and borrowings.
Our Credit Facilities generally contain customary default provisions such as a minimum net worth amount, a profitability test, and a restriction on changing our business and loan quality standards. In addition, our Credit Facilities require or are expected to require the repayment of all outstanding debt on the maturity which may disrupt our business and potentially the business of our portfolio companies that are financed through the facilities. An event of default under these facilities would likely result, among other things, in termination of the availability of further funds under the facilities and accelerated maturity dates for all amounts outstanding under the facilities, which would likely disrupt our business and, potentially, the business of the portfolio companies whose loans we finance through the facilities. This could reduce our revenues and, by delaying any cash payment allowed to us under our facilities until the lender has been paid in full, reduce our liquidity and cash flow and impair our ability to grow our business and our ability to make distributions sufficient to maintain our status as a RIC.
The terms of future available financing may place limits on our financial and operation flexibility. If we are unable to obtain sufficient capital in the future, we may be forced to reduce or discontinue our operations, not be able to make new investments, or otherwise respond to changing business conditions or competitive pressures.
97
To the extent original issue discount and paid-in-kind interest constitute a portion of our income, we will be exposed to typical risks associated with such income being required to be included in taxable and accounting income prior to receipt of cash representing such income.
Our investments may include original issue discount, or OID, instruments and contractual payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest, which represents contractual interest added to a loan balance and due at the end of such loan’s term. To the extent OID or PIK interest constitute a portion of our income, we are exposed to typical risks associated with such income being required to be included in taxable and accounting income prior to receipt of cash, including the following:
OID instruments may have higher yields, which reflect the payment deferral and credit risk associated with these instruments;
OID accruals may create uncertainty about the source of our distributions to stockholders;
OID and PIK instruments may have unreliable valuations because their continuing accruals require continuing judgments about the collectability of the deferred payments and the value of the collateral; and
OID and PIK instruments may represent a higher credit risk than coupon loans.
If we are unable to satisfy Code requirements for qualification as a RIC, then we will be subject to corporate-level income tax, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
We elected to be treated as a RIC for federal income tax purposes with the filing of our federal corporate income tax return for 2006. We will not qualify for the tax treatment allowable to RICs if we are unable to comply with the source of income, asset diversification and distribution requirements contained in Subchapter M of the Code, or if we fail to maintain our election to be regulated as a business development company under the 1940 Act. If we fail to qualify for the federal income tax benefits allowable to RICs for any reason and become subject to a corporate-level income tax, the resulting taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution to our stockholders and the actual amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us, the net asset value of our common stock and the total return, if any, obtainable from your investment in our common stock. Any net operating losses that we incur in periods during which we qualify as a RIC will not offset net capital gains (i.e., net realized long-term capital gains in excess of net realized short-term capital losses), and we cannot pass such net operating losses through to our stockholders.
We may have difficulty paying our required distributions under applicable tax rules if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.
In accordance with U.S. federal tax requirements, we include in income for tax purposes certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as contractual PIK interest, which represents contractual interest added to a loan balance and due at the end of such loan’s term. In addition to the cash yields received on our loans, in some instances, certain loans may also include any of the following: end-of-term payments, exit fees, balloon payment fees or prepayment fees. The increases in loan balances as a result of contractual PIK arrangements are included in income for the period in which such payment-in-kind interest was accrued, which is often in advance of receiving cash payment, and are separately identified on our statements of cash flows. We also may be required to include in income for tax purposes certain other amounts prior to receiving the related cash.
Any warrants that we receive in connection with our debt investments will generally be valued as part of the negotiation process with the particular portfolio company. As a result, a portion of the aggregate purchase price for the debt investments and warrants will be allocated to the warrants that we receive. This will generally result in “original issue discount” for tax purposes, which we must recognize as ordinary income, increasing the amount that we are required to distribute to qualify for the federal income tax benefits applicable to RICs. Because these warrants generally will not produce distributable cash for us at the same time as we are required to make distributions in respect of the related original issue discount, we would need to obtain cash from other sources or to pay a portion of our distributions using shares of newly issued common stock, consistent with Internal Revenue Service requirements, to satisfy such distribution requirements.
Other features of the debt instruments that we hold may also cause such instruments to generate original issue discount, resulting in a dividend distribution requirement in excess of current cash interest received. Since in certain cases we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty meeting the RIC tax requirement to distribute generally an amount equal to at least 90% of our net ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any. Under such circumstances, we may have to sell some of our assets, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investment originations to meet these distribution requirements. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources and are otherwise unable to satisfy such distribution requirements, we may fail to qualify for the federal income tax benefits allowable to RICs and, thus, become subject to a corporate-level income tax on all our income.
98
Our realized gains are reduced by amounts paid pursuant to the warrant participation agreement.
Citigroup, a former credit facility provider to Hercules, has an equity participation right through a warrant participation agreement on the pool of loans and certain warrants formerly collateralized under its then existing credit facility (the “Citigroup Facility”). Pursuant to the warrant participation agreement, we granted to Citigroup a 10% participation in all warrants held as collateral. As a result, Citigroup is entitled to 10% of the realized gains on certain warrants until the realized gains paid to Citigroup pursuant to the agreement equals $3,750,000 (the “Maximum Participation Limit”). The obligations under the warrant participation agreement continue even after the Citigroup Facility is terminated until the Maximum Participation Limit has been reached.
During the six-months ended June 30, 2013, we reduced our realized gain by approximately $207,000 for Citigroup’s participation in the gain on sale of equity securities which were obtained from exercising a portfolio company warrant which was included in the collateral pool. We recorded a decrease on participation liability and an increase on unrealized appreciation by a net amount of approximately $98,000 as a result of depreciation of fair value during the six-month period ended June 30, 2013 on the pool of warrants collateralized under the warrant participation agreement. The value of their participation right on unrealized gains in the related equity investments was approximately $215,000 as of June 30, 2013 and is included in accrued liabilities. There can be no assurances that the unrealized appreciation of the warrants will not be higher or lower in future periods due to fluctuations in the value of the warrants, thereby increasing or reducing the effect on the cost of borrowing. Since inception of the agreement, we have paid Citigroup approximately $1.6 million under the warrant participation agreement thereby reducing our realized gains by this amount. We will continue to pay Citigroup under the warrant participation agreement until the Maximum Participation Limit is reached or the warrants expire. Warrants subject to the Citigroup participation agreement are set to expire between August 2013 and January 2017.
SBA regulations limit the outstanding dollar amount of SBA guaranteed debentures that may be issued by an SBIC or group of SBICs under common control.
The SBA regulations currently limit the dollar amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures that can be issued by any one SBIC to $150.0 million or to a group of SBICs under common control to $225.0 million. A proposed bill in the U.S. Senate, the Expanding Access to Capital for Entrepreneurial Act, or Senate Bill 511, would increase the total SBIC leverage capacity for affiliated SBIC funds from $225 million to $350 million. However, the ultimate form and likely outcome of such legislation or any similar legislation cannot be predicted.
Uncertainty relating to the LIBOR calculation process may adversely affect the value of our portfolio of the LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities.
Concerns have been publicized that some of the member banks surveyed by the British Bankers’ Association (“BBA”) in connection with the calculation of LIBOR across a range of maturities and currencies may have been under-reporting or otherwise manipulating the inter-bank lending rate applicable to them in order to profit on their derivatives positions or to avoid an appearance of capital insufficiency or adverse reputational or other consequences that may have resulted from reporting inter-bank lending rates higher than those they actually submitted. A number of BBA member banks have entered into settlements with their regulators and law enforcement agencies with respect to alleged manipulation of LIBOR, and investigations by regulators and governmental authorities in various jurisdictions are ongoing.
Actions by the BBA, regulators or law enforcement agencies may result in changes to the manner in which LIBOR is determined. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes may adversely affect the market for LIBOR-based securities, including our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities. In addition, any further changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the market for LIBOR-based securities or the value of our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities.
99
During the six month period ended June 30, 2013, we issued approximately 93,000 shares of common stock to shareholders in connection with the dividend reinvestment plan. These issuances were not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The aggregate value the shares of our common stock issued under our dividend reinvestment plan was approximately $1.2 million.
Not Applicable
ExhibitNumber
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
/S/ MANUEL A. HENRIQUEZ
/S/ JESSICA BARON
101
EXHIBIT INDEX
102