UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
☒
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number
001-36462
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
45-5338504
(State of Incorporation)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
2600 McCormick Drive, Suite 300
Clearwater, Florida 33759
(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)
(727) 362-7200
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒No☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes☒No☐
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes☐No☒
The aggregate number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, outstanding on November 3, 2016 was 31,566,410.
HERITAGE INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
Table of Contents
Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets: September 30, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, 2015
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income: Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity: Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)
5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows: Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)
6
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
26
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
34
Item 4 Controls and Procedures
36
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
Item 1A Risk Factors
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 4 Mine Safety Disclosures
37
Item 6 Exhibits
Signatures
38
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) or in documents incorporated by reference that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include statements about anticipated growth in revenue, earnings per share, estimated unpaid losses on insurance policies, investment returns and expectations about our liquidity, and our ability to meet our investment objectives and to manage and mitigate market risk with respect to our investments. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about the industry and market in which we operate, and management’s beliefs and assumptions. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “would,” “estimate,” or “continue” or the negative variations thereof or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such statements. The risks and uncertainties include, without limitation:
•
increased costs of reinsurance, non-availability of reinsurance, and non-collectability of reinsurance;
the potential for discontinuation of the Citizens depopulation program and our inability to select favorable Citizens policies to assume;
a lack of significant redundancy in our operations;
our exposure to catastrophic events;
our failure to attract and retain qualified employees and independent agents or our loss of key personnel;
our inability to generate investment income;
our inability to maintain our financial stability rating;
effects of emerging claim and coverage issues relating to legal, judicial, environmental and social conditions;
the failure of our risk mitigation strategies or loss limitation methods; and
other risks and uncertainties described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.
These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The forward-looking statements we make in our Form 10-Q are valid only as of the date of our Form 10-Q and may not occur in light of the risks, uncertainties and assumptions that we describe from time to time in our filings with the SEC. A detailed discussion of these and other risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from our forward-looking statements is included in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation and disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
2
Item 1 – Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Amounts in thousands, except per share and share amounts)
September 30, 2016
December 31, 2015
ASSETS
(unaudited)
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale, at fair value (amortized
cost of $509,184 and $370,967 in 2016 and 2015, respectively)
$
517,573
371,783
Equity securities, available for sale, at fair value (cost of $33,935 and $32,439
in 2016 and 2015, respectively)
32,205
28,313
Total investments
549,778
400,096
Cash and cash equivalents
130,835
236,277
Restricted cash
19,261
13,085
Accrued investment income
4,624
3,409
Premiums receivable, net
35,161
30,565
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
168,650
78,517
Income taxes receivable
5,280
—
Deferred income taxes
7,964
Deferred policy acquisition costs, net
42,129
34,800
Property and equipment, net
17,600
17,111
Intangibles, net
26,402
2,120
Goodwill
48,267
8,028
Other assets
5,727
5,426
Total Assets
1,053,714
837,398
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
125,695
83,722
Unearned premiums
323,354
302,493
Reinsurance payable
177,867
60,210
6,966
Income tax payable
2,092
Advance premiums
20,382
12,138
Accrued compensation
5,500
2,305
Other liabilities
16,706
17,885
Total Liabilities
676,470
480,845
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized, 30,141,744 shares issued and 29,016,744 outstanding at September 30, 2016 and 30,441,410 outstanding at December 31, 2015
Additional paid-in capital
206,240
202,628
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
4,116
(2,033
)
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,424,666 shares at September 30, 2016
(20,562
Retained earnings
187,447
155,955
Total Stockholders' Equity
377,244
356,553
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Other Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016
2015
REVENUE:
Gross premiums written
147,232
148,993
471,793
418,558
Change in gross unearned premiums
17,464
(20,759
8,483
(37,222
Gross premiums earned
164,696
128,234
480,276
381,336
Ceded premiums
(63,141
(45,873
(163,461
(102,640
Net premiums earned
101,555
82,361
316,815
278,696
Net investment income
2,326
1,973
6,586
5,696
Net realized gains
1,119
1,946
1,762
1,827
Other revenue
4,306
2,964
10,988
7,241
Total revenue
109,306
89,244
336,151
293,460
EXPENSES:
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
53,906
35,791
169,663
102,239
Policy acquisition costs
22,597
15,512
61,478
40,858
General and administrative expenses
14,191
10,226
44,602
33,366
Total expenses
90,694
61,529
275,743
176,463
Income before income taxes
18,612
27,715
60,408
116,997
Provision for income taxes
7,682
10,902
23,688
44,728
Net income
10,930
16,813
36,720
72,269
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments
(1,237
(1,168
11,773
(6,638
Reclassification adjustment for net realized investment (gains) losses
(1,119
(1,946
(1,762
(1,827
Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of other comprehensive income (loss)
908
1,201
(3,862
3,265
Total comprehensive income
9,482
14,900
42,869
67,069
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic
29,213,222
30,177,633
29,742,984
29,952,668
Diluted
30,483,553
29,786,156
30,289,328
Earnings per share
0.37
0.56
1.23
2.41
0.55
2.39
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)
Common Shares
Par Value
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Treasury Shares
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Total
Stockholders'
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2015
30,441,410
Buy-back common shares of Company stock
(1,424,666
Stock-based compensation
3,612
Dividends declared on common stock
(5,228
Net unrealized change in investments,
net of tax
6,149
Balance at September 30, 2016
29,016,744
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2014
29,794,960
188,342
65,021
1,723
255,089
1,873
Issuance of restricted common stock in connection with the acquisition of BRC Restoration
79,850
2,000
Exercise of stock options and warrants
410,600
6,369
(5,200
Balance at September 30, 2015
30,285,410
198,584
137,290
(3,477
332,400
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Amounts in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Amortization of bond discount
5,924
4,688
Depreciation and amortization
6,075
926
Deferred income taxes, net of acquired
11,069
3,445
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(1,215
(665
(3,194
(6,561
(6,176
(8,447
(85,341
(80,393
Reinsurance premium payable
(14,398
(5,280
(6,666
(7,329
(8,124
225
(1,284
41,973
22,976
(8,484
37,222
117,657
118,476
Income taxes payable
(2,092
(12,808
1,977
11,224
6,153
7,923
(10,917
(22,311
Net cash provided by operating activities
99,595
117,538
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments available for sale
135,802
119,181
Purchases of investments available for sale
(203,091
(201,885
Acquisition of a business, net of cash acquired
(110,319
(6,000
Proceeds from sale of investment in mortgage loan
6,849
Cost of property and equipment acquired
(1,639
(1,263
Net cash used in investing activities
(179,247
(83,118
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Dividends
Purchase of treasury stock
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(25,790
(Decrease) Increase in cash and cash equivalents
(105,442
40,789
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
160,481
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
201,270
Supplemental Cash Flows Information:
Income taxes paid, net
27,912
61,200
Issuance of shares for consideration in the acquisition of a business
(Amounts in thousands, except per share and share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 include Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (“Parent Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries: Heritage Property & Casualty Insurance Company (“Heritage P&C”), which provides personal and commercial residential insurance; Heritage MGA, LLC, the managing general agent that manages substantially all aspects of our insurance subsidiary’s business; Contractors’ Alliance Network, LLC (“CAN”), our vendor network manager which includes BRC Restoration Specialists, Inc. (“BRC”), our provider of restoration, emergency and recovery services; Zephyr Acquisition Company (“ZAC”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Zephyr Insurance Company, Inc. (“Zephyr”), our provider for writing insurance policies for residential wind insurance within the State of Hawaii; Skye Lane Properties, LLC, our property management subsidiary; First Access Insurance Group, LLC, our retail agency; Osprey Re Ltd. (“Osprey”), our reinsurance subsidiary that provides a portion of the reinsurance protection purchased by our insurance subsidiary; and Heritage Insurance Claims, LLC, an inactive subsidiary reserved for future development. The assets of BRC, a building restoration company, were acquired and merged into CAN in 2015. The assets of SVM Restoration Services Inc. (“SVM”), a water mitigation company, were acquired and merged into CAN in 2014.
Our primary products are personal and commercial residential insurance, which we currently offer in Florida, under authorization from the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation (“FLOIR”). We also began offering personal residential insurance in the states of North Carolina, South Carolina and through the Zephyr acquisition, Hawaii. We are also licensed to do business in Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi. We conduct our operations under one business segment.
The condensed consolidated financial information included herein as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. However, such information reflects all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods. The results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 are not indicative of annual results. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The December 31, 2015 consolidated balance sheet was derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015. References to “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company” refer to Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
The Company qualifies as an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act, of 1933, as amended, as modified by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). As a result, the Company is eligible to take advantage of certain temporary exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. The Company intends to continue to take advantage of some, but not all, of the exemptions available to emerging growth companies until such time that it is no longer an emerging growth company. The Company has, however, irrevocably elected not to take advantage of the extended transition period afforded by the JOBS Act for the implementation of new or revised accounting standards. As a result, the Company will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies.
NOTE 2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Changes to significant accounting policies
We have made no material changes to our significant accounting policies as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Reclassifications
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. Such classifications include reclassifying goodwill and intangibles from other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company describes below recent pronouncements that may have a significant effect on its financial statements or on its disclosures upon future adoption. The Company does not discuss recent pronouncements that are not anticipated to have an impact on, or are unrelated to, its financial condition, results of operations, or related disclosures.
In August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued (“FASB”) ASC 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASC 2016-15 is a new accounting standard that will make eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This updated is effective on January 1, 2018, and will require adoption on a retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”), ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) (ASU 2016-13), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13 requires credit losses on most financial assets measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model (referred to as the current expected credit loss (CECL) model). ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (ASU 2016-09), which requires an entity to record all excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies as an income tax benefit or expense in the income statement. ASU 2016-09 will also require an entity to elect an accounting policy to either estimate the number of forfeitures or account for forfeitures when they occur. ASU 2016-09 becomes effective for the Company during the first quarter of 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (ASU 2016-02), which provides guidance on the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases. The new standard supersedes present U.S. GAAP guidance on leases and requires substantially all leases to be reported on the balance sheet as right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, as well as additional disclosures. The new standard is effective as of January 1, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASU 2016-01), which will significantly change the income statement impact of equity investments held by an entity, and the recognition of changes in fair value of financial liabilities when the fair value option is elected. ASU 2016-01 becomes effective for the Company during the first quarter 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU Topic 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The ASU creates a new topic, Topic 606, to provide guidance on revenue recognition for entities that enter into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enter into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additional disclosures are required to provide quantitative and qualitative information regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial statements.
There are no other recently issued accounting standards that apply to the Company or that are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
NOTE 3. ACQUISITION
On March 21, 2016, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding stock of ZAC and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Zephyr, in exchange for approximately $110,319, net of cash acquired. Zephyr is a specialty property insurance provider that offers policies for residential customers in Hawaii that only cover the peril of the windstorm-hurricane insurance policies. This acquisition furthers the Company’s strategic push to diversify business operations and achieve potential reinsurance synergies while expanding growth opportunities outside of Florida.
8
The transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The valuations of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on preliminary estimates of fair value and are subject to revision as the Company finalizes its analysis. The results of operations of ZAC have been included in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition. The acquisition method requires significant use of estimates and is based on the information available to management at the time these condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared. As the acquisition was recently completed, the Company has not yet completed its assessment of the fair value of the intangible assets acquired, nor the related amortization expense applicable to definite-lived intangible assets during the period between the acquisition date and period end. As such, the total estimated purchase price in excess of net assets acquired and liabilities assumed has initially been recorded as goodwill and identified intangible assets. Goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes and will not be amortized, but is subject to annual impairment tests using a fair-value based approach. The Company is entitled to a holdback provision, for purposes of securing the indemnification obligation of the sellers for any damages arising out of or relating to a previous dispute should one arise. The following table summarizes the preliminary unaudited, estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The Company is in the process of finalizing the purchase price allocation and, accordingly, the following allocation of the purchase price, before income taxes, is subject to adjustments during the measurement period:
Purchase Consideration
Cash, net of cash acquired
110,319
Assets acquired
Investments
76,543
Premiums and agent's receivable
1,403
526
4,792
Intangible assets – value of business acquired
5,004
Intangible assets
24,203
Total assets acquired
112,471
Total liabilities assumed
(42,391
Net assets acquired
70,080
40,239
Total purchase price
Pro Forma Information
The following table presents selected unaudited pro forma information, assuming the acquisition of ZAC had occurred on January 1, 2015. The unaudited pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the results that the Company would have achieved had the transaction taken place on January 1, 2015, and the unaudited pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of future financial results.
Revenue
100,709
344,972
320,905
20,982
38,673
80,886
Basic, earnings per share
0.70
1.33
2.70
Diluted, earnings per share
0.69
2.67
Our consolidated results of operations include the results of ZAC since the acquisition date. ZAC’s revenues and pre-tax net income included in our results of operations since the acquisition for the three months ended September 30, 2016 were $8,985 and $4,566, respectively, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, $19,347 and $11,073, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, income before taxes included $2,016 and $4,780, respectively, of amortization expense related to the identified intangible assets recorded as a result of the acquisition.
9
NOTE 4. INVESTMENTS
The following table details the difference between cost or adjusted/amortized cost and estimated fair value, by major investment category, at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
Cost or Adjusted /
Amortized Cost
Gross Unrealized
Gains
Losses
Fair Value
(In thousands)
U.S. government and agency securities
27,473
316
27,782
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions
284,949
4,815
124
289,640
Special revenue
56,957
438
185
57,210
Industrial and miscellaneous
136,392
3,053
30
139,415
Redeemable preferred stocks
3,413
11
3,526
Total fixed maturities
509,184
8,746
357
Nonredeemable preferred stocks
14,439
661
57
15,043
Equity securities
19,496
1,209
3,543
17,162
Total equity securities
33,935
1,870
3,600
543,119
10,616
3,957
25,474
16
387
25,103
184,145
2,107
137
186,115
42,593
19
204
42,408
115,313
294
932
114,675
3,442
61
21
3,482
370,967
2,497
1,681
12,443
338
43
12,738
19,996
398
4,819
15,575
32,439
736
4,862
403,406
3,233
6,543
The Company calculates the gain or loss realized on the sale of investments by comparing the sales price (fair value) to the cost or adjusted/amortized cost of the security sold. The Company determines the cost or adjusted/amortized cost of the security sold using the specific-identification method. The following tables detail the Company’s net realized gains (losses) by major investment category for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.
Gains (Losses)
Fair Value at Sale
Fixed maturities
1,091
17,301
1,200
62,412
289
1,739
826
15,949
Total realized gains
1,380
19,040
2,026
78,361
(232
575
(75
5,948
(29
445
(5
328
Total realized losses
(261
1,020
(80
6,276
20,060
84,637
10
2,668
166,350
1,237
66,513
46
7,855
716
20,581
2,714
174,205
1,953
87,094
(66
12,973
(116
11,219
(886
2,948
(10
2,196
(952
15,921
(126
13,415
190,126
100,509
The table below summarizes the Company’s fixed maturities at September 30, 2016 by contractual maturity periods. Actual results may differ as issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without penalties, prior to the contractual maturity of those obligations.
Cost or Amortized Cost
Percent of Total
Due in one year or less
70,683
14
%
70,696
Due after one year through five years
177,559
35
178,915
Due after five years through ten years
165,557
32
169,966
33
Due after ten years
95,385
97,996
100
The following table summarizes the Company’s net investment income by major investment category for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:
2,338
1,936
6,368
5,254
495
439
1,465
1,292
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
79
150
215
361
Other investments
67
(96
128
2,926
2,592
7,952
7,035
Investment expenses
600
619
1,366
1,339
Net investment income, less investment expenses
The Company does not intend to sell investments that are in an unrealized loss position and it is not likely that the Company will be required to sell any investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis. As such, the Company does not consider those investments with an unrealized loss to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015. There were no material other-than-temporary impairments or credit losses related to available-for-sale securities in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015. In addition, there were no material gross realized gains or losses in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.
The following tables present an aging of our unrealized investment losses by investment class as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
Less Than Twelve Months
Twelve Months or More
Number of
Securities
Gross
Unrealized
13
7,815
1
111
116
62,818
1,492
23
6,623
1,972
82
157
12,402
27
2,215
384
212
244
308
90,042
48
5,929
138
2,165
22
324
52
304
2,848
126
3,240
8,066
190
339
5,013
131
3,262
8,390
434
647
95,055
152
3,310
14,319
385
19,849
397
50
10,979
164
141
870
73,312
1,318
134
279
60,203
1,646
950
317
1,605
165,293
18
76
3,525
29
1,560
250
2,975
8,416
20
1,844
2,680
3,004
9,976
25
1,858
2,930
4,609
175,269
1,934
6,455
NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
For the Company’s investments in U.S government securities that do not have prices in active markets, agency securities, state and municipal governments, and corporate bonds, the Company obtains the fair value from its third-party valuation service and evaluates the relevant inputs, assumptions, methodologies and conclusions associated with such valuations. The valuation service calculates prices for the Company’s investments in the aforementioned security types on a month-end basis by using several matrix-pricing methodologies that incorporate inputs from various sources. The model the valuation service uses to price U.S. government securities and securities of states and municipalities incorporates inputs from active market makers and inter-dealer brokers. To price corporate bonds and agency securities, the valuation service calculates non-call yield spreads on all issuers, uses option-adjusted yield spreads to account for any early redemption features, then adds final spreads to the U.S. Treasury curve as of quarter end. The inputs the valuation service uses in its calculations are not quoted prices in active markets, but are observable inputs, and therefore represent Level 2 inputs.
The following tables present information about the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company assesses the levels for the investments at each measurement date, and transfers between levels are recognized on the actual date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer in accordance with the Company’s accounting policy regarding the
12
recognitions of transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, there were no transfers in or out of Levels 1, 2 and 3.
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
(in thousands)
Fixed maturities investments:
766
27,016
23,947
33,263
Total fixed maturities investments
28,239
489,334
60,444
Assets:
Certificates of deposit (1)
3,300
22,361
2,742
375,083
29,143
345,940
403,396
57,456
(1)
Includes commercial paper with maturities of three months or less at time of purchase of $3,300 classified in cash and cash equivalents.
NOTE 6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
Land
2,582
Building
10,301
9,599
Computer hardware and software
3,132
2,502
Office furniture and equipment
759
634
Tenant and leasehold improvements
3,330
Vehicle fleet
845
693
Total, at cost
20,949
19,310
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
3,349
2,199
Depreciation expense for property and equipment was $797 and $1,150 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The Company’s real estate consists of 14 acres of land and four buildings with a gross area of approximately 191 square feet.
NOTE 7. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 goodwill was $48,267 and $8,028, respectively, and intangible assets were $26,402 and $2,120, respectively. The increase in goodwill and intangible assets reflects the goodwill and intangible assets recorded in connection with the Zephyr acquisition. The preliminary purchase price allocation to goodwill and intangible assets has not been finalized and is subject to change. As of September 30, 2016, the amount of goodwill that we expect to be deductible for income tax purposes is $8,028. The Company has estimated the useful life of the value of business acquired (see Note 3) to be one year and is amortizing the balance based on the remaining percentage of acquired unearned premium from Zephyr. The Company has estimated the useful life of the other intangible assets to range between 10-15 years and is currently amortizing at an average of 12.5 years until the finalization of the purchase price allocation is completed and the useful lives have been finalized.
Balance as of December 31, 2015
Goodwill acquired
Impairment
Balance as of September 30, 2016
Estimated annual pretax amortization of intangible assets for the remainder of 2016 and each of the next five years and thereafter is as follows (in thousands):
Remainder of 2016
931
2017
2,435
2018
2,128
2019
2020
2,116
2021
2,104
Thereafter
14,560
Amortization expense of intangible assets was $2,061 and $4,924 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The Company recorded no amortization expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.
NOTE 8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) for the periods indicated.
Basic earnings per share:
Net income attributable to common stockholders (000's)
Diluted earnings per share:
Weighted average dilutive shares
-
305,920
43,172
336,660
Total weighted average dilutive shares
As of September 30, 2016, the Company has repurchased 1,424,666 shares of the Company’s stock in open market transactions for $20,562. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had $49,438 remaining to purchase shares under its authorized $70,000 share repurchase plan.
NOTE 9. DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS
The Company defers certain costs in connection with written policies, called Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs (“DPAC”), net of corresponding amounts of ceded reinsurance commissions, called Deferred Reinsurance Ceding Commissions (“DRCC”). Net DPAC is amortized over the effective period of the related insurance policies.
The Company anticipates that its DPAC costs will be fully recoverable in the near term. The table below depicts the activity with regard to DPAC during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:
Beginning Balance
42,568
31,948
24,370
Policy acquisition costs deferred
22,158
16,058
68,807
48,982
Amortization
(22,597
(15,512
(61,478
(40,858
Ending Balance
32,494
NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES
During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded $23,688 and $44,728, respectively, of income tax expense which corresponds to an estimated annual effective tax rate of 39.2% and 38.2%, respectively.
15
The table below summarizes the significant components of our net deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Deferred tax assets:
17,772
17,979
Tax-related discount on loss reserve
1,766
1,140
Unrealized loss
1,617
2,828
1,277
Other
1,705
256
Total deferred tax assets
24,071
22,269
Deferred tax liabilities:
Deferred acquisition costs
15,664
13,424
Unrealized gain
2,542
Investment basis difference on purchase
840
Intangibles
10,224
Property and equipment
477
473
1,290
408
Total deferred tax liabilities
31,037
14,305
Net deferred tax (liabilities) assets
(6,966
In assessing the net realizable value of deferred tax assets, the Company considered whether it is more likely than not that it will not realize some portion or all of the deferred tax assets. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.
As of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had no significant uncertain tax positions.
NOTE 11. REINSURANCE
The Company’s reinsurance program is designed, utilizing the Company’s risk management methodology, to address its exposure to catastrophes or large non-catastrophic losses. The Company’s program provides reinsurance protection for catastrophes including hurricanes, tropical storms and tornadoes. The Company’s reinsurance agreements are part of its catastrophe management strategy, which is intended to provide its stockholders an acceptable return on the risks assumed in its property business, and to reduce variability of earnings, while providing protection to the Company’s policyholders.
2016 - 2017 Reinsurance Program
The Company placed its reinsurance program for the period from June 1, 2016 through May 31, 2017 during the second quarter of 2016. This reinsurance program incorporates the catastrophe risk of our two insurance subsidiaries, Heritage P&C, a Florida based insurer and Zephyr, a Hawaii based insurer, into one reinsurance structure. The programs are incorporated into one reinsurance structure and are allocated amongst traditional reinsurers, catastrophe bonds issued by Citrus Re Ltd., a Bermuda special purpose insurer formed in 2014 (“Citrus Re”), and the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund (“FHCF”).Coverage is shared by both insurers unless otherwise noted. The 2016-2017 reinsurance program provides, including retention, first event coverage up to $1.9 billion in Florida, first event coverage up to $1.1 billion in Hawaii, and multiple event coverage up to $3.0 billion.
The reinsurance program, which is segmented into layers of coverage, protects the Company for excess property catastrophe losses and loss adjustment expenses. The Company’s 2016-2017 reinsurance program incorporates the mandatory coverage required by law to be placed with FHCF, which is available only for Florida catastrophe risk. For the 2016 hurricane season, the Company reduced its selected participation percentage in the FHCF from 75% to 45%. The Company also purchased private reinsurance below, alongside and above the FHCF layer, as well as aggregate reinsurance coverage. The following describes the various layers of the Company’s June 1, 2016 to May 31, 2017 reinsurance program.
The Company’s Retention. If a first catastrophic event strikes Florida, the Company has a primary retention of the first $40 million of losses and loss adjustment expenses, of which Osprey is responsible for $20 million. If a first catastrophic event strikes Hawaii, the Company has a primary retention of the first $30 million of losses and loss adjustment expenses, of which Osprey is responsible for $15 million. If a second event strikes Florida, Heritage P&C’s primary retention decreases to $15 million and the remainder of the losses are ceded to third parties. If a second event strikes Hawaii, Zephyr’s primary retention decreases to $5 million. In the second event only for a loss exceeding $190 million, there is an
additional Company co-participation of 5.4% subject to a maximum co-participation of $11.6 million. Heritage P&C and Zephyr each have a $5 million primary retention for events beyond the second catastrophic event. Osprey has no primary retention beyond the first catastrophic event in Florida or Hawaii. Additionally, Osprey is responsible for payment of up to $5.3 million of reinstatement premium, depending on the amount of losses incurred.
Shared Layers above retention and below FHCF. Immediately above the retention, the Company has purchased $374 million of reinsurance from third party reinsurers. Through the payment of a reinstatement premium, the Company is able to reinstate the full amount of this reinsurance one time. To the extent that $374 million or a portion thereof is exhausted in a first catastrophic event, the Company has purchased reinstatement premium protection insurance to pay the required premium necessary for the reinstatement of this coverage.
FHCF Layer. The Company’s FHCF program provides coverage for Florida events only and includes an estimated maximum provisional limit of 45% of $1.3 billion, in excess of its retention of $399 million. The limit and retention of the FHCF coverage is subject to upward or downward adjustment based on, among other things, submitted exposures to FHCF by all participants. The Company has purchased coverage alongside from third party reinsurers and through reinsurance agreements with Citrus Re. To the extent the FHCF coverage is adjusted, this private reinsurance with third party reinsurers and Citrus Re will adjust to fill in any gaps in coverage up to the reinsurers’ aggregate limits for this layer. The FHCF coverage cannot be reinstated once exhausted, but it does provide coverage for multiple events.
Layers alongside the FHCF. The Florida reinsurance program includes third party layers alongside the FHCF. These include 2015 C and 2015 B series catastrophe bonds, which cover Florida only for the 2016 season, and 2016 D and 2016 E catastrophe bond series issued by Citrus Re, which total $377.5 million of coverage, as discussed below, as well as a traditional reinsurance layer providing $200 million of coverage. Through a reinstatement, the Company is able to reinstate the full amount of the $200 million of reinsurance one time. These 2016 catastrophe bonds and the traditional reinsurance layer provide coverage for both Florida and Hawaii catastrophe losses.
2016 Class D and E Notes: During February 2016, Heritage P&C and Zephyr entered into two catastrophe reinsurance agreements with Citrus Re. The agreements provide for three years of coverage from catastrophic losses caused by named storms, including hurricanes, beginning on June 1, 2016. Heritage P&C and Zephyr pay a periodic premium to Citrus Re during this three-year risk period. Citrus Re issued an aggregate of $250 million of principal-at-risk variable notes due February 2019 to fund the reinsurance trust account and its obligations to Heritage P&C and Zephyr under the reinsurance agreements. The Class D notes provide $150 million of coverage and the Class E notes provide $100 million of coverage. The Class D and Class E notes provide reinsurance coverage for a sliver of the catastrophe coverage that had previously been provided by the FHCF. The limit of coverage is fully collateralized by a reinsurance trust account for the benefit of Heritage P&C and Zephyr. The maturity date of the notes may be extended up to two additional years to satisfy claims for catastrophic events occurring during the three-year term of the reinsurance agreements.
17
2015 Class B and C Notes: During April 2015, Heritage P&C entered into catastrophe reinsurance agreements with Citrus Re. The 2015 notes do not provide coverage for Zephyr for the 2016 hurricane season. The agreements provide for three years of coverage from catastrophic losses caused by named storms, including hurricanes, beginning on June 1, 2015. Heritage P&C pays a periodic premium to Citrus Re during this three-year risk period. Citrus Re issued principal-at-risk variable notes due April 2018 to fund the reinsurance trust account and its obligations to Heritage P&C under the reinsurance agreements. The Class B notes provide $97.5 million of coverage, and the Class C notes provide $30 million of coverage. The Class B and Class C notes provide reinsurance coverage for a sliver of the catastrophe coverage that had previously been provided by the FHCF. The limit of coverage is fully collateralized by a reinsurance trust account for the benefit of Heritage P&C. The maturity date of the notes may be extended up to two additional years to satisfy claims for catastrophic events occurring during the three-year term of the reinsurance agreements.
Layers above the FHCF - Florida program
2015 Class A Notes: During April 2015, Heritage P&C entered into catastrophe reinsurance agreements with Citrus Re. The 2015 notes do not provide coverage for Zephyr for the 2016 hurricane season. The agreements provide for three years of coverage from catastrophic losses caused by named storms, including hurricanes, beginning on June 1, 2015. Heritage P&C pays a periodic premium to Citrus Re during this three-year risk period. Citrus Re issued principal-at-risk variable notes due April 2018 to fund the reinsurance trust account and its obligations to Heritage P&C under the reinsurance agreements. The Class A notes provide $150 million of coverage for a layer above the FHCF. The limit of coverage is fully collateralized by a reinsurance trust account for the benefit of Heritage P&C. The maturity date of the notes may be extended up to two additional years to satisfy claims for catastrophic events occurring during the three-year term of the reinsurance agreements.
2014 Class A Notes: Coverage immediately below and above the 2015 Class A notes is provided by the 2014 reinsurance agreements entered into with Citrus Re. The first contract with Citrus Re provides $150 million of coverage immediately below 2015 Class A, and the second contract provides an additional $50 million of coverage which sits immediately above 2015 Class A. During April 2014, Heritage P&C entered into two catastrophe reinsurance agreements with Citrus Re. The 2014 notes do not provide coverage for Zephyr for the 2016 hurricane season. The agreements provide for three years of coverage from catastrophe losses caused by certain named storms, including hurricanes, beginning on June 1, 2014. The limit of coverage of $200 million is fully collateralized by a reinsurance trust account for the benefit of Heritage P&C. Heritage P&C pays a periodic premium to Citrus Re during this three-year risk period. Citrus Re issued $200 million of principal-at-risk variable notes due April 2017 to fund the reinsurance trust account and its obligations to Heritage P&C under the reinsurance agreements. The maturity date of the notes may be extended up to two additional years to satisfy claims for catastrophic events occurring during the three-year term of the reinsurance agreements.
Multi-Zonal Layers – The Company purchased additional layers which provide coverage for Florida for a second event and both first and second event coverage for Hawaii. The first event coverage for Hawaii is a counterpart to the Florida-only catastrophe bond layers and FHCF layer. There is a total of $282 million of reinsurance coverage purchased on this basis, with $260 million having a prepaid reinstatement. The multi-zonal occurrence layer provides first and second event coverage of $260 million for Hawaii and second event coverage of $260 million for Florida. A top and drop multi-zonal layer provides first and subsequent event coverage of $22 million for Hawaii and second or subsequent event coverage of $22 million for Florida.
Aggregate Coverage. In addition to what is described above, much of the reinsurance is structured in a way to provide aggregate coverage. $682 million of limit is structured on this basis. To the extent that this coverage is not fully exhausted in the first catastrophic event, it provides coverage commencing at its reduced retention for second and subsequent events where underlying coverage has been previously exhausted. $460 million has a reinstatement, which is prepaid.
For a first catastrophic event striking Florida, our reinsurance program provides coverage for $1.9 billion of losses and loss adjustment expenses, including our retention, and we are responsible for all losses and loss adjustment expenses in excess of such amount. For a first catastrophic event striking Hawaii, our reinsurance program provides coverage for $1.1 billion of losses and loss adjustment expenses, including our retention, and we are responsible for all losses and loss adjustment expenses in excess of such amount. For subsequent catastrophic events, our total available coverage depends on the magnitude of the first event, as we may have coverage remaining from layers that were not previously fully exhausted. $860 million of limit purchased in 2016 includes a reinstatement, with $825 million being prepaid. In total, we have purchased $3.0 billion of potential reinsurance coverage, including our retention, for multiple catastrophic events. Our ability to access this coverage, however, will be subject to the severity and frequency of such events.
2015 – 2016 Reinsurance Program
During the second quarter of 2015, the Company placed its reinsurance program for the period from June 1, 2015 through May 31, 2016. The Company’s 2015-2016 reinsurance program incorporated the mandatory coverage required by law to be placed with FHCF. For the 2015 hurricane season, the Company selected 75% participation in the FHCF. The Company also purchased private reinsurance below, alongside and above the FHCF layer, as well as aggregate reinsurance coverage. The following describes the various layers of the Company’s June 1, 2015 to May 31, 2016 reinsurance program.
The Company’s Retention. For the first catastrophic event, the Company had a primary retention of the first $35 million of losses and loss adjustment expenses, of which Osprey was responsible for $20 million. For a second event, Heritage P&C’s primary retention decreased to $5 million and Osprey is responsible for $10 million. To the extent that there is reinsurance coverage remaining, Heritage P&C has a $5 million primary retention for events beyond the second catastrophic event. Osprey had no primary retention beyond the second catastrophic event.
Layers Below FHCF. Immediately above the Company’s retention, the Company purchased $440 million of reinsurance from third party reinsurers. Through the payment of a reinstatement premium, the Company was able to reinstate the full amount of this reinsurance one time. To the extent that $440 million or a portion thereof was exhausted in a first catastrophic event, the Company had purchased reinstatement premium protection insurance to pay the required premium necessary for the reinstatement of this coverage. A portion of this coverage wrapped around the FHCF and provided coverage alongside and above the FHCF.
FHCF Layer. The Company’s FHCF coverage included an estimated maximum provisional limit of 75% of $920 million, or $690 million, in excess of its retention and private reinsurance of $336 million. The limit and retention of the FHCF coverage was subject to upward or downward adjustment based on, among other things, submitted exposures to FHCF by all participants. The Company had purchased coverage alongside from third party reinsurers and through reinsurance agreements with Citrus Re. To the extent the FHCF coverage was adjusted, this private reinsurance with third party reinsurers and Citrus Re would adjust to fill in any gaps in coverage up to the reinsurers’ aggregate limits for this layer. The FHCF coverage could not be reinstated once exhausted, but it did provide coverage for multiple events.
CAT Bond Layer alongside the FHCF. During April 2015 Heritage P&C entered into three catastrophe reinsurance agreements with Citrus Re. The agreements provided for three years of coverage from catastrophic losses caused by named storms, including hurricanes, beginning on June 1, 2015. Heritage P&C paid periodic premiums to Citrus Re during the three-year risk period. Citrus Re issued an aggregate of $277.5 million of principal-at-risk variable notes due April 2017 to fund the reinsurance trust account and its obligations to Heritage P&C under the reinsurance agreements. These notes were issued in three classes. The Class A notes provide $150 million of coverage for the layer immediately above the FHCF. The Class B notes provided $97.5 million of coverage, and the Class C notes provided $30 million of coverage. The Class B and Class C notes provided reinsurance coverage for a sliver of the catastrophe coverage that had previously been provided by the FHCF. The limit of coverage was fully collateralized by a reinsurance trust account for the benefit of Heritage P&C. The maturity date of the notes may be extended up to two additional years to satisfy claims for catastrophic events occurring during the three-year term of the reinsurance agreements.
CAT Bond Layer above the FHCF. Immediately above the FHCF layer had the coverage provided by the 2015 reinsurance agreement entered into with Citrus Re. The Citrus Re 2015 Class A notes provided up to $150 million of coverage immediately above the FHCF layer. Coverage immediately above the 2015 Class A notes was provided by the 2014 reinsurance agreements entered into with Citrus Re. The first contract with Citrus Re provided $150 million of coverage and the second contract provided an additional $50 million of coverage.
Aggregate Coverage. In addition to the layers described above, the Company also purchased $125 million of aggregate reinsurance coverage for losses and loss adjustment expenses in excess of $1.648 billion for a first catastrophic event. To the extent that this coverage was not fully exhausted in the first catastrophic event, it provided coverage commencing at its reduced retention for second and subsequent events and where underlying coverage had been previously exhausted. There was no reinstatement of the aggregate reinsurance coverage once exhausted, but it did provide coverage for multiple events.
For a first catastrophic event, our 2015-2016 reinsurance program provided coverage for $1.8 billion of losses and loss adjustment expenses, including our retention, and were responsible for all losses and loss adjustment expenses in excess of such amount. For subsequent catastrophic events, our total available coverage depended on the magnitude of the first event, as we may have had coverage remaining from layers that were not previously fully exhausted. We also purchased reinstatement premium protection insurance to provide an additional $440.0 million of coverage. Our aggregate reinsurance layer also provided coverage for
second and subsequent events to the extent not exhausted in prior events. In total, we purchased $2.3 billion of reinsurance coverage, including our retention, for multiple catastrophic events for the 2015-2016 hurricane season.
Property Per Risk Coverage
The Company also purchased property per risk coverage for losses and loss adjustment expenses in excess of $1 million per claim. The limit recovered for an individual loss is $9 million and total limit for all losses is $27 million. There are two reinstatements available with additional premium due based on the amount of the layer exhausted. In addition, the Company purchased facultative reinsurance in excess of $10 million for any commercial properties it insured for which the total insured value exceeded $10 million.
2014 – 2015 Reinsurance Program
During the second quarter of 2014, the Company placed its reinsurance program for the period from June 1, 2014 through May 31, 2015. The Company’s 2014-2015 reinsurance program incorporated the mandatory coverage required by law to be placed with FHCF. The Company also purchased private reinsurance below, alongside and above the FHCF layer, as well as aggregate reinsurance coverage. The following describes the various layers of the Company’s June 1, 2014 to May 31, 2015 reinsurance program.
The Company’s Retention. For the first catastrophic event, the Company had a primary retention of the first $15 million of losses and loss adjustment expenses, of which Osprey was responsible for $6 million. For a second event, Heritage P&C’s primary retention decreased to $2 million and Osprey was responsible for $4 million. To the extent that there was reinsurance coverage remaining, Heritage P&C had a $2 million primary retention for events beyond the third catastrophic event. Osprey had no primary retention beyond the second catastrophic event.
Layers Below FHCF. Immediately above the Company’s retention, the Company purchased $185 million of reinsurance from third party reinsurers. Through the payment of a reinstatement premium, the Company was able to reinstate the full amount of this reinsurance one time. To the extent that $185 million or a portion thereof was exhausted in a first catastrophic event, the Company purchased reinstatement premium protection insurance to pay the required premium necessary for the reinstatement of this coverage. A portion of this coverage wrapped around the FHCF and provided coverage alongside the FHCF.
FHCF Layer. The Company’s FHCF coverage included an estimated maximum provisional limit of 90% of $484 million, or $436 million, in excess of its retention and private reinsurance of $181 million. The limit and retention of the FHCF coverage was subject to upward or downward adjustment based on, among other things, submitted exposures to FHCF by all participants. The Company purchased coverage alongside from third party reinsurers. The layer alongside was in the amount of $48 million. To the extent the FHCF coverage was adjusted, this private reinsurance would adjust to fill in any gaps in coverage up to the reinsurers’ aggregate limits for this layer. The FHCF coverage could not be reinstated once exhausted, but it did provide coverage for multiple events.
CAT Bond Layer. Immediately above the FHCF layer was the coverage provided by the reinsurance agreements entered into with Citrus Re. The first contract with Citrus Re provided $150 million of coverage and the second contract provided an additional $50 million of coverage. Osprey provided $25 million of coverage alongside the second contract.
Aggregate Coverage. In addition to the layers described above, the Company purchased $105 million of aggregate reinsurance coverage for losses and loss adjustment expenses in excess of $825.0 million for a first catastrophic event. To the extent that this coverage was not fully exhausted in the first catastrophic event, it provided coverage commencing at its reduced retention levels for second and subsequent events and where underlying coverage had been previously exhausted. There was no reinstatement of the aggregate reinsurance coverage once exhausted, but it did provide coverage for multiple events. Osprey provided $20 million of protection in the layer above $940 million.
For a first catastrophic event, the Company’s 2014-2015 reinsurance program provided coverage for $990 million of losses and loss adjustment expenses, including its retention, and the Company was responsible for all losses and loss adjustment expenses in excess of such amount. For subsequent catastrophic events, the Company’s total available coverage depended on the magnitude of the first event, as the Company may have had coverage remaining from layers that were not previously fully exhausted. The Company purchased reinstatement premium protection insurance to provide an additional $185 million of coverage. The Company’s aggregate reinsurance layer also provided coverage for second and subsequent events to the extent not exhausted in prior events.
Assumption Transactions and Assumed Premiums Written
The following table depicts written premiums, earned premiums and losses, showing the effects that the Company’s assumption transactions have on these components of the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income:
Premium written:
Direct
147,691
115,876
463,778
352,162
Assumed
(459
33,117
8,015
66,396
Ceded
(5,164
(611
(248,823
(183,033
Net premium written
142,068
148,382
222,970
235,525
Change in unearned premiums:
8,538
(11,996
(32,143
(82,979
8,926
(8,763
40,626
45,757
(57,977
(45,262
85,362
80,393
Net change
(40,513
(66,021
93,845
43,171
Premiums earned:
156,229
103,880
431,635
269,183
8,467
24,354
48,641
112,153
Losses and LAE incurred:
59,381
25,266
141,181
68,269
(3,753
10,525
30,208
33,970
(1,722
(1,726
Net losses and LAE incurred
The following table highlights the effects that the Company’s assumption transactions have on unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses and unearned premiums:
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses:
96,604
60,223
30,155
23,499
Gross unpaid losses and LAE
126,759
(1,064
Net unpaid losses and LAE
Unearned premiums:
320,241
258,754
3,113
43,739
Gross unearned premiums
(168,650
(78,517
Net unearned premiums
154,704
223,976
NOTE 12. RESERVE FOR UNPAID LOSSES
The Company determines the reserve for unpaid losses on an individual-case basis for all incidents reported. The liability also includes amounts which are commonly referred to as incurred but not reported, or “IBNR”, claims as of the balance sheet date.
The table below summarizes the activity related to the Company’s reserve for unpaid losses:
Balance, beginning of period
117,485
61,846
51,469
Less: reinsurance recoverable on paid losses
Net balance, beginning of period
Incurred related to:
Current year
50,746
38,258
152,372
109,070
Prior years
3,160
(2,467
17,291
(6,831
Total incurred
Paid related to:
33,330
18,721
71,383
55,399
12,366
4,471
56,307
23,864
Total paid
45,696
23,192
127,690
79,263
Net balance, end of period
74,445
Plus: reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses
Balance, end of period
The Company writes insurance in the states of Florida, North Carolina, South Carolina and Hawaii, which could be exposed to hurricanes or other natural catastrophes. Although the occurrence of a major catastrophe could have a significant effect on our monthly or quarterly results, such an event is unlikely to be so material as to disrupt our overall normal operations. However, the Company is unable to predict the frequency or severity of any such events that may occur in the near term or thereafter. The Company believes that the reserve for unpaid losses reasonably represents the amount necessary to pay all claims and related expenses which may arise from incidents that have occurred as of the balance sheet date.
The Company’s losses incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 reflect a prior year deficiency of $17,291 and a redundancy of $6,831, respectively, associated with management’s best estimate of the actuarial loss and LAE reserves with consideration given to Company specific historical loss experience. All of the unfavorable development was from personal lines. Also, most of the unfavorable emergence came from the second, third and fourth quarters of 2015, primarily related to claims involving litigation and claims that were represented by attorneys, public adjusters or others (sometimes referred to as Assignment of Benefits). Also, a majority of the unfavorable development in 2016 has been isolated to the tri-county region of Florida (the counties of Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach).
NOTE 13. OTHER LIABILITIES
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, other liabilities included approximately $2,926 and $4,920, respectively, related to amounts owed to Citizens for policies assumed by the Company, where the policyholder subsequently opted-out of the assumption program. Also, included in other liabilities for the periods ended September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $4,550 and $5,793 for commissions payable, $4,220 and $3,919 for accounts payable and other payables, and $5,010 and $3,253 for taxes, remittances and items not allocated and unearned revenue, respectively.
NOTE 14. STATUTORY ACCOUNTING AND REGULATIONS
State laws and regulations, as well as national regulatory agency requirements, govern the operations of all insurers such as our insurance subsidiary. The various laws and regulations require that insurers maintain minimum amounts of statutory surplus and risk-based capital; restrict insurers’ ability to pay dividends; restrict the allowable investment types and investment mixes, and subject the Company’s insurers to assessments.
The Company’s insurance subsidiaries are required to file with state insurance regulatory authorities an “Annual Statement” which reports, among other items, net income and surplus as regards policyholders, which is called stockholder’s equity under GAAP. Combined results of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries reported statutory net income of $24 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and statutory net income of $45,000 for the year ended December 31, 2015.The Company’s insurance subsidiaries must maintain capital and surplus ratios or balances as determined by the regulatory authority of the states in which they are domiciled. Heritage P&C and Zephyr are required to maintain capital and surplus equal to the greater of $15,000 or 10% of their respective liabilities. The Company’s combined statutory surplus was $277,148 and $216,600 at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. State law also requires the Company’s insurance subsidiary to adhere to prescribed premium-to-capital surplus ratios, with which the Company is in compliance.
In 2014, the Florida legislature passed Senate Bill 1308, which was signed into law by the Governor. Among other things, this bill incorporates the National Association of Insurance Commissioners; (“NAIC”) recommendations with regard to expansion of the regulation of insurers to include non-insurance entity affiliates. Specifically, the new law permits the FLOIR to examine affiliated entities within an insurance holding company system in order to ascertain the financial condition of the insurer. The law also provides for certain disclosures with regard to enterprise risk, which are satisfied by the provision of related information filed with the SEC. This legislation was designed to bolster regulation for insurer solvency and governance and became effective January 1, 2015.
NOTE 15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is involved in claims-related legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues amounts resulting from claims-related legal actions in unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses during the period that it determines an unfavorable outcome becomes probable and it can estimate the amounts. Management makes revisions to its estimates based on its analysis of subsequent information that the Company receives regarding various factors, including: (i) per claim information; (ii) company and industry historical loss experience; (iii) judicial decisions and legal developments in the awarding of damages; and (iv) trends in general economic conditions, including the effects of inflation. When determinable, the Company discloses the range of possible losses in excess of those accrued and for reasonably possible losses.
NOTE 16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Company has been party to various related party transactions involving certain of its officers, directors and significant stockholders as set forth below. The Company has entered into each of these arrangements without obligation to continue its effect in the future and the associated expense was immaterial to its results of operations or financial position as of September 30, 2016 and 2015.
The Company has entered into an agreement with a real estate management company controlled by one of its directors to manage its Clearwater office space. Management services are provided at a fixed fee, plus ordinary and necessary out of pocket expenses. Fees for additional services, such as the oversight of construction activity, are provided for on an as-needed basis. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company paid the management service company approximately $86 and $94, respectively.
NOTE 17. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
The Company provides a 401(k) plan for its employees. The Company contributes 3% of employees’ salary, up to the maximum allowable contribution, regardless of the employees’ level of participation in the plan. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s contributions to the plan on behalf of the participating employees were $408 and $203, respectively.
The Company provides for its employees a partially self-insured healthcare plan and benefits. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company incurred medical premium costs in the aggregate of $1,535 and $897, respectively. The Company also recorded approximately $472 as unpaid claims as of December 31, 2015. A stop loss reinsurance policy caps the maximum loss that could be incurred by the Company under the self-insured plan. The Company’s stop loss coverage per employee is $60 for which any excess cost would be covered by the reinsurer subject to an aggregate limit for losses in excess of $1,500 which would provide up to $1,000 of coverage. Any excess of the $1,500 retention and the $1 million of aggregate coverage would be borne by the Company. The aggregate stop loss commences once our expenses exceed 125% of the annual aggregate expected claims.
NOTE 18. EQUITY
The total amount of authorized capital stock consists of 50,000,000 shares of common stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had 29,016,744 shares of common stock outstanding, 1,424,666 treasury shares of common stock and 1,125,000 unvested restricted common stock issued reflecting total paid-in capital of $206,240 as of such date.
Common Stock
Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters subject to a vote of stockholders, subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding preferred stock. Accordingly, holders of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote in any election of directors may elect all of the directors standing for election, subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding preferred stock. Holders of common stock will be entitled to receive ratably any dividends that the board of directors may declare out of funds legally available therefor, subject to any preferential dividend rights of outstanding preferred stock. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of common stock will be entitled to receive ratably its net assets available after the payment of all debts and other liabilities and subject to the prior rights of holders of any outstanding preferred stock. Holders of common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. There are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the common stock. All outstanding shares of the Company’s capital stock are fully paid and nonassessable.
As more fully disclosed in our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, there were, as of December 31, 2015, 30,441,410 shares of common stock outstanding, 1,149,923 stock options outstanding, and 1,125,000 unvested restricted stock grants, representing $202,628 of additional paid-in capital.
Stock Repurchase Program
On September 14, 2015, the Company announced that the Company’s Board of Directors, authorized a stock repurchase program authorizing the Company to repurchase up to $20,000 of the Company’s common stock. The stock repurchase program expires December 31, 2016. The Company purchased 612,300 shares at a total cost of $9,635 during the three months ended March 31, 2016, through open market or private transactions. The Company purchased an additional 527,989 shares at a cost of $6,927 during the three months ending months ended June 30, 2016, through open market or private transactions. On May 4, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized an additional stock repurchase of up to $50,000 of the Company’s common stock through on December 31, 2017. The Company purchased an additional 284,377 shares at a cost of $4,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2016, through open market or private transactions.
On March 2, 2016, the Company announced a first quarter dividend of $0.05 per share payable on April 5, 2016, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 15, 2016. On December 17, 2015, the Company announced a cash dividend of $0.05 per share on the Company’s common stock, payable on January 13, 2016 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on December 31, 2015.
On May 4, 2016, the Company announced a second quarter dividend of $0.06 per share payable on July 1, 2016, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on June 15, 2016. On August 3, 2016, the Company announced a third quarter dividend of $0.06 per share payable on October 3, 2016 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on September 15, 2016. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, dividends charged to retained earnings were $5,228 and $1,578, respectively.
NOTE 19. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has adopted the Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc., Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which became effective on May 22, 2014. The Plan has authorized 2,981,737 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the Plan for future grants.
At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there were 170,814 shares available for grant under the Plan.
The Company recognizes compensation expense under ASC 718 for its stock-based payments based on the fair value of the awards. The Company grants stock options at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the dates the options are granted. The options have a maximum term of ten years from the date of grant and vest primarily in equal annual installments over a range of one to five year periods following the date of grant for employee options. If a participant’s employment relationship ends, the participant’s vested awards will remain exercisable for the shorter of a period of 30 days or the period ending on the latest date on which such award could have been exercisable. The fair value of each option grant is separately estimated for each grant date. The fair value of each option is amortized into compensation expense on a straight-line basis between the grant date for the award and each vesting date. The Company estimates the fair value of all stock option awards as of the date of the grant by applying the Black-Scholes-Merton multiple-option pricing valuation model (“Black-Scholes model”). The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in the determination of compensation expense.
24
Stock Options and Restricted Stock
Stock Options
A summary of information related to stock options and restricted stock outstanding at September 30, 2016 is as follows:
Options
Weighted - Average Grant Date Fair
Value
1,149,923
2.99
Granted
Exercised
Vested and exercisable as of September 30, 2016
The Company had approximately $0 and $25 of unrecognized stock compensation expense at September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, related to unvested stock-based compensation granted. The Company recognized approximately $0 and $1,900 of compensation expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Stock-based compensation costs for restricted grants is measured based on the closing fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation costs over the award’s requisite service period on a straight-line basis for time-based restricted stock grants.
Restricted Stock
Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair
Number of shares
Value per Share
Unvested, at December 31, 2015
1,125,000
21.40
Vested
Canceled and forfeited
Unvested at September 30, 2016
The Company recognized $3,612 of compensation expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The Company had approximately $19,715 of unrecognized stock compensation expense at September 30, 2016 related to unvested compensation, which the Company expects to recognize ratably over the period of 4.2 years. The Company did not have any compensation expense for the comparable period for 2015 relating to restricted stock.
NOTE 20. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On November 8, 2016, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has declared a quarterly cash dividend on the Company’s common stock of $0.06 per share. The fourth quarter dividend of $0.06 per share is payable on January 4, 2017 to stockholders of record as of December 15, 2016. The declaration and payment of any future dividends will be subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on a variety of factors including the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
During the fourth quarter of 2016, Hurricane Matthew impacted Florida and North Carolina where the Company writes property insurance. The Company has been working diligently to address claims of insureds that were impacted by the storm. To date, the Company has received approximately 2,500 claims related to Hurricane Matthew and now expect to incur pre-tax catastrophe losses of approximately $30,000 during the fourth quarter of 2016. Heritage does not expect to incur its full retention of $40,000.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes and information included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (“2015 Form 10-K”). Unless the context requires otherwise, as used in this Form 10-Q, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company,” “our company,” and similar references refer to Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries.
(In thousands, except share and per share data, unless otherwise indicated)
Financial Results Highlights for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Approximately 327,000 policies in-force at September 30, 2016, of which approximately 54% were assumed from Citizens, 6% were assumed from SSIC, 17% were from voluntary sales and 23% were acquired in connection with the Zephyr acquisition
Gross premiums written of $471,793 and total revenue of $336,151
Net premiums earned of $316,815
Net income of $36,720
Combined ratio of 91.4% on a gross basis and 87.0% on a net basis
Cash, cash equivalents and investments of $680,613, with total assets of $1,053,714
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
When we prepare our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), we must make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts we report. Certain of these estimates result from judgments that can be subjective and complex. As a result of that subjectivity and complexity, and because we continuously evaluate these estimates and assumptions based on a variety of factors, actual results could materially differ from our estimates and assumptions if changes in one or more factors require us to make accounting adjustments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we reassessed our critical accounting policies and estimates as disclosed within our 2015 Form 10-K; we have made no material changes or additions with regard to such policies and estimates.
Results of Operations
The following table reports our unaudited results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015:
Selected Other Data
Book value per share
13.00
10.98
Growth in book value per share
18.4
41.0
Return on average equity
11.7
20.9
20.0
32.8
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
Gross premiums written decreased to $147,232 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $148,993 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in gross premiums written relates primarily to the significant assumption of policies from Citizens in the third quarter 2015 totaling approximately $33,000, whereas the Company did not assume policies in the third quarter of 2016. The decrease was partially offset by the inclusion of Zephyr premiums of approximately $15,666. The assumed business is deemed new written premium at the assumption date whereas renewal of those policies is recorded as written premium at the renewal date. Gross premiums written by state for the quarter was $128,068 from Florida, $15,666 from Hawaii, $3,300 from North Carolina and $198 from South Carolina. Of our $147,232 gross premiums written for the three months ended September 30, 2016, $147,691 represents direct premiums written, offset by a $459 reduction for cancelled assumed premiums written. Personal residential business accounted for $130,677 and commercial residential accounted for $16,555 of the total gross premiums written for the three months ended September 30, 2016.
The Company did not assume policies from Citizens during the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $33,000 in assumed premium for the same period last year. The late opt-out activity and cancellations from prior quarter assumptions resulted in negative assumed premiums for the quarter of $459.
Gross premiums earned increased to $164,696 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $128,234 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase relates to a greater amount of Florida and new states personal residential premium in force and Florida commercial residential premium in force from Heritage P&C of $136,306 coupled with $58,037 of premium in force from Zephyr.
Ceded premiums increased to $63,141 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $45,873 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in ceded premiums correlates to the increase in policies in force, including an increase in Florida commercial residential business and the addition of Florida and Hawaii wind only policies, which have a higher cost of reinsurance, partially offset by reinsurance synergies on the combined multistate program.
On June 1, 2016, we placed a new catastrophe reinsurance program for the 2016 hurricane season, as described in Note 11 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Due to our significant growth, including commercial residential and wind only business in Florida and the acquisition of ZAC in Hawaii, we purchased approximately $3.0 billion of total coverage compared to approximately $2.2 billion of total coverage in 2015. The cost of the catastrophe coverage for the 2016 program was approximately $244,000 compared to $177,000 for the 2015 program. The costs of the annual reinsurance are amortized over the twelve months beginning June 1. Accordingly, the reinsurance costs for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 are significantly higher than in the third quarter of 2015.
Net premiums earned increased to $101,555 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $82,361 for three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in net premiums earned is primarily attributable to the increase in the number of policies in force during the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015, partially offset by the increased ceded premiums earned.
Net investment income, inclusive of realized investment gains, decreased to $3,445 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $3,919 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The change in net investment income is due to a decrease in net realized gains from the invested assets offset by the investment income gains from the inclusion of ZAC’s portfolio.
Other revenue increased to $4,306 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $2,964 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in other revenue is primarily attributable to the policy fees generated by our growing portfolio of policies including the renewal of policies previously assumed from Citizens. Policy fees are earned on all voluntary and assumed business once the policy renews.
Total revenue increased to $109,306 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $89,244 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in total revenue was due primarily to the growth in gross premiums earned resulting from the significant increase in the number of policies in force as compared to the same period in the prior year, partially offset by the increased ceded premiums earned.
Expenses
Losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) increased to $53,906 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $35,791 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in losses and loss adjustment expenses resulted primarily from an increase in the premiums in force between the respective periods coupled with an increase in the loss ratio of 4.8 points. Losses and loss adjustment expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2016 includes losses paid of $45,696 and an $8,210 increase in unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, including the addition of $3,500 of IBNR reserves. As of September 30, 2016,
28
we reported $125,695 in unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses which included $73,402 attributable to IBNR, or 58% of total reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses.
Policy acquisition costs increased to $22,597 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $15,512 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase is primarily attributable to agent commission and premium associated with the increase in new and renewed policies. The inclusion of the Zephyr business added $3,101 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $0 for the comparable period for 2015.
General and administrative expenses increased to $14,191 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $10,226 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase was due primarily to expenses associated with infrastructure growth, and $1,359 of general and administrative expenses for the quarter attributable to ZAC.
Provision for income taxes was $7,682 and $10,902 for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was 41.3% and 39.3%, respectively. The effective tax rate for both periods was impacted by our reconciliation of the income tax provision to the related filed tax return.
Our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2016 reflect net income of $10,930, or $0.37 per diluted common share, compared to net income of $16,813, or $0.55 per diluted common share, for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease is primarily due to the favorable ceded premium ratio we experienced in 2015 and the increase in our loss ratio in 2016, as discussed below. The acquisition of ZAC was completed on March 21, 2016. ZAC’s third quarter earnings were included in our condensed consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income.
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 and 2015
Gross premiums written increased to $471,793 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $418,558 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in gross premiums written was due to the renewal of a significant number of personal and commercial policies previously assumed from Citizens, the addition of policies from the ZAC acquisition and the growing number of new voluntary policies written. Of our $471,793 gross premiums written for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, $463,778 represents direct premiums written and $8,015 represents assumed premiums written. Personal residential business accounted for $387,567 and commercial residential $84,226 of the total gross premiums written for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
Gross premiums earned increased to $480,276 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $381,336 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Our premiums in force as of September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015 were approximately $645,900 and $542,100, respectively, and this increase had a favorable impact on our gross premiums earned.
Ceded premiums increased to $163,461 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $102,640 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in ceded premiums reflects the increase in premiums in force, which includes an increase in Florida commercial residential business and the addition of Florida and Hawaii wind only policies, which have a higher cost of reinsurance.
On June 1, 2016, we placed a new catastrophe reinsurance program for the 2016 hurricane season, as described in Note 11 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Due to our significant growth, including commercial residential and wind only business in Florida and the acquisition of ZAC in Hawaii, we purchased approximately $3.0 billion of total coverage compared to approximately $2.2 billion of total coverage in 2015. The cost of the catastrophe coverage for the 2016 program was approximately $244,000 compared to $177,000 for the 2015 program. The costs of the annual reinsurance are amortized over the twelve months beginning June 1. Accordingly, the reinsurance costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are significantly higher than the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
Net premiums earned increased to $316,815 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $278,696 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in net premiums earned is primarily attributable to the increase in the number of policies in force during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015, partially offset by the increased ceded premiums earned.
Net investment income, inclusive of realized investment gains, increased to $8,348 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $7,523 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in net investment income is due to the significant increase in invested assets from $400,096 at September 30, 2015 to $549,778 at September 30, 2016. The increase resulted primarily from policy growth and the inclusion of the investments from ZAC’s portfolio.
Other revenue increased to $10,988 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $7,241 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in other revenue is primarily attributable to the policy fees generated by our larger portfolio of new and renewed policies.
Total revenue increased to $336,151 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $293,460 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in total revenue was due primarily to the growth in gross premiums earned resulting from the significant increase in the number of policies in force throughout the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in the prior year, partially offset by the increased ceded premiums earned.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses increased to $169,663 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $102,239 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in losses and loss adjustment expenses resulted primarily from an increase in the number of policies in force between the respective periods coupled with approximately $17,291 of unfavorable development on prior year reserves and an increase in our loss ratio. Losses and loss adjustment expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 include losses paid of $128,425 and a $14,688 increase in unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses, including the addition of $26,550 of IBNR reserves. As of September 30, 2016, we reported $125,695 in unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses which included $73,402 attributable to IBNR, or 58.3% of total reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses.
The Company’s losses incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 reflect a prior year deficiency of $17,291 and a redundancy of $6,831, respectively, associated with management’s best estimate of the actuarial loss and LAE reserves with consideration given to Company specific historical loss experience. All of the unfavorable development was from personal lines. Also, most of the unfavorable emergence came from the second, third and fourth quarters of 2015, primarily related to claims involving litigation and claims that were represented by attorneys, public adjusters or others (sometimes referred to as Assignment of Benefits). Also, a majority of the unfavorable development in 2016 has been isolated to the tri-county region of Florida (the counties of Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach). At December 31, 2015, we estimated that the personal lines ultimate loss and LAE ratio, which includes the associated IBNR would be 34.5% for the loss (accident) year 2015. As of September 30, we have revised the estimated personal lines ultimate loss ratio to be 38.8% for the loss year 2015, based on the re-estimation of IBNR, a 4.3 percentage point increase.
Policy acquisition costs increased to $61,478 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $40,858 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase is primarily attributable to agent commission and premium tax associated with the increase in new and renewal policies. Additionally, the inclusion of the Zephyr business beginning March 21, 2016 added $5,688 of policy acquisition costs during the period.
General and administrative expenses increased to $44,602 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as compared to $33,366 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase was due primarily to expenses associated with infrastructure growth. The acquisition of ZAC added $2,628 of general and administrative expenses.
Provision for income taxes was $23,688 and $44,728 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was 39.2% and 38.2%, respectively.
Our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 reflect net income of $36,720, or $1.23 earnings per diluted common share, compared to net income of $72,269 or $2.39 earnings per diluted common share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease is primarily due to the favorable ceded premium ratio we experienced in 2015 related to depopulation activity in 2014 and 2015, coupled with the increase in our loss ratio in 2016, as previously discussed above. The acquisition of ZAC was completed on March 21, 2016. ZAC’s earnings were included in our condensed consolidated statements of income and other comprehensive income.
Ratios
Due to the impact our reinsurance costs have on net premiums earned from period to period, our management believes the ratios discussed below are more meaningful when viewed on a gross basis.
Ratios to Gross Premiums Earned:
Ceded premium ratio
38.4
35.8
Loss ratio
32.7
27.9
Expense ratio
22.3
20.1
Combined ratio
93.4
83.8
Ratios to Net Premiums Earned:
53.1
43.5
36.2
31.3
89.3
74.8
Our ceded premium ratio increased to 38.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 35.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The 2016 reinsurance program, effective June 1, 2016, includes coverage for an increase in commercial residential policies and the addition of Zephyr and Heritage wind only policies, all of which have a higher ceded premium ratio.
Gross loss ratio
Our gross loss ratio increased to 32.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 27.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily as a result of weather, including approximately $4,000 from hurricane Hermine, unfavorable development on severe activity, prior year loss reserves and current market conditions for Florida personal lines multi-peril business with respect to litigated and attorney represented claims, particularly in the tri-county area.
31
Net loss ratio
Our net loss ratio increased to 53.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 43.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily as a result of the items discussed above combined with the increase in the ceded premium ratio.
Gross expense ratio
Our gross expense ratio increased to 22.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 20.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the larger Citizens take-out activity favorably impacting the prior year acquisition costs, coupled with an increase in the general and administration expense ratio.
Net expense ratio
Our net expense ratio increased to 36.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 31.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily due to the increase in the gross expense ratio discussed above, coupled with the higher ceded premium ratio.
Our combined ratio on a gross basis increased to 93.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 83.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2015. Our combined ratio on a net basis increased to 89.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 74.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The combined ratio increased due to the ceded premium ratio, the gross loss ratio and the gross expense ratio as described above.
34.0
26.9
35.3
26.8
22.1
19.5
91.4
73.2
53.6
36.7
33.4
26.6
87.0
63.3
Our ceded premium ratio increased to 34.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 26.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The ceded premium ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 benefited significantly from large Citizens take-out activity in the fourth quarter of 2014 and first quarter of 2015 for which we incurred no additional reinsurance costs until June 1, 2015. Additionally, the 2016 reinsurance program, which was effective June 1, 2016, included coverage for an increase in commercial residential policies and the addition of Zephyr and Heritage wind only polices, all of which have a higher ceded premium ratio.
Our gross loss ratio increased to 35.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 26.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as a result of severe weather activity, primarily in the first quarter and third quarter, unfavorable development on prior year loss reserves and current market conditions for Florida personal lines multi-peril business with respect to litigated and attorney represented claims, particularly in the tri-county area.
Our net loss ratio increased to 53.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 36.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily as a result of the items discussed above coupled with an increase in the ceded premium ratio.
Our gross expense ratio increased to 22.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 19.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 primarily due to the larger Citizens take-out activity favorably impacting the prior year’s acquisition expense coupled with a nominal increase in the general and administration ratio related to infrastructure growth.
Our net expense ratio increased to 33.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 26.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, which is explained above, coupled with an increase in ceded premium ratio.
Our combined ratio on a gross basis increased to 91.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 73.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Our combined ratio on a net basis increased to 87.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 63.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The variance is the result of the significant benefit to our ceded premium ratio and acquisition expense ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from the much larger Citizens take-outs in the fourth quarter of 2014 and first quarter of 2015, reducing the 2015 reinsurance and acquisition expense ratio, and the much higher gross loss ratio in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to the severe weather activity and unfavorable prior year development.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of September 30, 2016, we had $130,835 of cash and cash equivalents, which primarily consisted of cash and money market accounts. We intend to hold substantial cash balances during hurricane season to meet seasonal liquidity needs and cash resources are required for reinsurance deposits. We also had $19,261 in restricted cash to meet our contractual obligations related to the catastrophe bonds issued by Citrus Re.
Osprey is required to maintain a collateral trust account equal to the risk that it assumes from Heritage P&C, less amounts collateralized through a letter of credit. As of September 30, 2016, $12,600 was held in Osprey’s trust account and an additional $12,700 was collateralized with a letter of credit.
Although we can provide no assurances, we believe that we maintain sufficient liquidity to pay Heritage P&C’s claims and expenses, as well as to satisfy commitments in the event of unforeseen events such as inadequate premium rates or reserve deficiencies. We maintain a comprehensive reinsurance program at levels management considers adequate to diversify risk and safeguard our financial position.
Although we can provide no assurance, we believe our current capital resources, together with cash provided from our operations, will be sufficient to meet currently anticipated working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Cash Flows
Change
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities
(17,943
Investing activities
(96,129
Financing activities
(32,159
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
(146,231
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities amounted to $99,595 for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $117,538 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to higher reinsurance and claims costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $179,247 as compared to $83,118 for the comparable period of 2015. The increase in cash used in investing activities primarily relates to the payment of $110,319 for the acquisition of ZAC, net of cash acquired. In addition cash was used to increase the managed investment portfolio.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $25,790 as compared to cash provided by financing activities of $6,369 for the comparable period of 2015. The increase in cash used in financing activities is due primarily to the stock repurchase program in which 1,424,666 shares were repurchased and payment of dividends during for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. For the comparable period of 2015, we received proceeds from the exercise of stock options in the amount of $6,329.
Seasonality of our Business
Our insurance business is seasonal as hurricanes typically occur during the period from June 1 through November 30 each year. With our reinsurance program effective on June 1 each year, any variation in the cost of our reinsurance, whether due to changes to reinsurance rates or changes in the total insured value of our policy base, will occur and be reflected in our financial results beginning June 1 of each year, subject to certain adjustments.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We obtained a $12,700 irrevocable letter of credit from a financial institution to secure Osprey’s obligations arising from our reinsurance program. We collateralized this letter of credit facility with otherwise unencumbered real estate. The letter of credit terminates on May 31, 2017.
JOBS Act
We qualify as an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this extended transition period and, as a result, we will adopt new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for other public companies.
We are in the process of evaluating the benefits of relying on other exemptions and reduced reporting requirements provided by the JOBS Act. Subject to certain conditions set forth in the JOBS Act, if as an emerging growth company we choose to rely on such exemptions, we may not be required to, among other things, (i) provide an auditor’s attestation report on our systems of internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (ii) provide all of the compensation disclosure that may be required of non-emerging growth public companies under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, (iii) comply with any requirement that may be adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding mandatory audit firm rotation or a supplement to the auditor’s report providing additional information about the audit and the financial statements (auditor discussion and analysis), and (iv) disclose certain executive compensation-related items such as the correlation between executive compensation and performance and comparisons of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation to median employee compensation. These exemptions will apply until we no longer meet the requirements of being an emerging growth company. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) following the fifth anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenue of at least $1 billion or (c) in which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer, which means the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our prior second fiscal quarter, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Our investment portfolios at September 30, 2016 included fixed maturity and equity securities, the purposes of which are not for trading or speculation. Our main objective is to maximize after-tax investment income and maintain sufficient liquidity to meet policyholder obligations while minimizing market risk, which is the potential economic loss from adverse fluctuations in securities’ prices. We consider many factors including credit ratings, investment concentrations, regulatory requirements, anticipated fluctuation of interest rates, durations and market conditions in developing investment strategies. Investment securities are managed by a group of
nationally recognized asset managers and are overseen by the investment committee appointed by our board of directors. Our investment portfolios are primarily exposed to interest rate risk, credit risk and equity price risk. We classify our fixed maturity and equity securities as available-for-sale and report any unrealized gains or losses, net of deferred income taxes, as a component of other comprehensive income within our stockholders’ equity. As such, any material temporary changes in their fair value can adversely impact the carrying value of our stockholders’ equity.
Interest Rate Risk
Our fixed maturity securities are sensitive to potential losses resulting from unfavorable changes in interest rates. We manage the risk by analyzing anticipated movement in interest rates and considering our future capital needs.
The following table illustrates the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates to the fair value of our fixed maturity securities at September 30, 2016 (in thousands):
Hypothetical Change in Interest rates
Estimated Fair Value After Change
Change In Estimated Fair
Percentage Increase
(Decrease) in Estimated
300 basis point increase
459,273
(58,300
(11
)%
200 basis point increase
478,701
(38,872
(8
100 basis point increase
498,134
(19,439
(4
100 basis point decrease
536,771
19,198
200 basis point decrease
549,099
31,526
300 basis point decrease
551,756
34,183
Credit Risk
Credit risk can expose us to potential losses arising principally from adverse changes in the financial condition of the issuer of our fixed maturities. We mitigate this risk by investing in fixed maturities that are generally investment grade and by diversifying our investment portfolio to avoid concentrations in any single issuer or market sector.
The following table presents the composition of our fixed maturity portfolio by rating at September 30, 2016 (in thousands):
Comparable
Rating
Amortized
Cost
% of Total
Estimated
% of total
AAA
146,576
147,833
AA+
60,515
61,289
AA
72,268
73,382
AA-
49,388
50,433
A+
46,940
48,128
A
50,157
50,962
A-
35,870
36,716
BBB+
31,689
32,599
BBB
11,198
11,576
BBB-
2,394
0
2,465
BB+
476
481
BB
1,000
997
B
321
NA and NR
392
396
Equity Price Risk
Our equity investment portfolio at September 30, 2016 consists of common stocks and non-redeemable preferred stocks. We may incur potential losses due to adverse changes in equity security prices. We manage this risk primarily through industry and issuer diversification and asset allocation techniques.
The following table illustrates the composition of our equity portfolio at September 30, 2016 (in thousands):
Fair value
Stocks by sector:
Financial
4,364
Energy
12,783
40
14,894
Subtotal
32,041
Mutual Funds and ETF by type:
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
At September 30, 2016, we did not have any material exposure to foreign currency related risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) that are designed to assure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
As required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2016.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most recent quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is a party to claims and legal actions arising routinely in the ordinary course of our business. Although we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of the claims and lawsuits asserted against us, we do not believe that any currently pending legal proceedings to which we are a party will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position results of operations or cash flow.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The risk factors disclosed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed on March 8, 2016 set forth information relating to various risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Those risk factors continue to be relevant to an understanding of our business, financial condition and operating results. No material changes have occurred with respect to those risk factors.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Repurchase of Common Stock
Total Number of Shares Purchased
Average Price Paid Per Share (1)
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (a)
March 1 - March 31
612,300
15.66
10,377,513
May 1 - May 31
213,355
13.71
57,437,597
June 1 - June 30
314,634
12.73
53,437,600
August 1 - August 31
115,000
13.75
51,852,706
September 1 - September 30
169,377
14.23
49,437,582
Average price paid per share excludes cash paid for commissions.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None
Item 6. Exhibits
The information required by this Item 6 is set forth in the Index to Exhibits accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 8, 2016
By:
/s/ BRUCE LUCAS
Bruce Lucas
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ STEVEN MARTINDALE
Steven Martindale
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Index to Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
Description
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.SC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.SC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
101. SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CAL
101. CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
101.DEF
101. DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
101.LAB
101. LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
101.PRE
101. PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
39