Heron Therapeutics
HRTX
#10157
Rank
$65.99 M
Marketcap
$0.35
Share price
-2.33%
Change (1 day)
-73.26%
Change (1 year)
Text size:
1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

[X] Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (Fee Required) For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995
or

[ ] Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (No Fee Required) For the transition period from
__________ to __________.

Commission File Number 0-16109

ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware 94-2875566
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
incorporation or organization)

3696 Haven Avenue, Redwood City, California 94063
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (415) 366-2626

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: Common Stock ($.01
par value)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive
proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
[X]

The aggregate market value of the voting stock of the registrant held by
nonaffiliates of the registrant as of February 29, 1996, was $59,924,243. (1)

As of February 29, 1996, 17,139,292 shares of registrant's Common Stock, $.01
par value, were outstanding.

Exhibit Index at Page 43
Total Pages 43

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Excludes 6,243,975 shares held by directors, officers and shareholders
whose ownership exceeds 5% of the outstanding shares at February 29,
1996. Exclusion of such shares should not be construed as indicating
that the holders thereof possess the power, direct or indirect, to
direct the management or policies of the registrant, or that such person
is controlled by or under common control with the registrant.
2



DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

DOCUMENT

FORM
10-K
PART

Definitive Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the Annual III
Meeting of Stockholders.

i
3


TABLE OF CONTENTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
ITEM PAGE
- ---- ----

PART I

<S> <C>
1. Business _______________________________________________________________ 1

2. Properties ______________________________________________________________ 12

3. Legal Proceedings ________________________________________________________ 13

4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders ____________________________ 13


PART II

5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters _____________ 14

6. Selected Financial Data ____________________________________________________ 14

7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations __________________________________________________ 15

8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data __________________________________ 22

9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting
and Financial Disclosure __________________________________________________ 37


PART III

10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant _______________________________ 37

11. Executive Compensation __________________________________________________ 37

12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management _________________ 37

13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions _________________________________ 37

PART IV

14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K _______________________ 38

Signatures _____________________________________________________________ 40
</TABLE>






ii
4
PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

INTRODUCTION--FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

To the extent that this report discusses future financial projections,
information or expectations about our products or markets, or otherwise makes
statements about future events, such statements are forward-looking and are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results
to differ materially from the statements made. These include, among others,
uncertainty associated with timely approval and acceptance of new products, the
costs associated with new product introductions, as well as other factors
described below under the headings "APS Technology", "Products", Ethical
Dermatology", "License and Technology--Related Agreements", "Government
Regulation", "Patents and Trade Secrets" and "Competition". In addition, such
risks and uncertainties also include the matters discussed under Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in
Item 7 below.

THE COMPANY

Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries ("APS" or the
"Company") is using its patented Microsponge(R) delivery systems and related
proprietary technologies to enhance the safety, effectiveness and aesthetic
quality of topical prescription, over-the-counter ("OTC") and personal care
products. The Company is currently manufacturing and marketing in the U.S. nine
OTC products based on its technology and is manufacturing and selling
Microsponge systems for use by corporate customers in approximately 70
different cosmetic and personal care products sold worldwide. APS holds 81
issued U.S. and foreign patents on its technology and has over 32 other patent
applications pending.

The Company, founded in February 1983 as a California corporation under the name
AMCO Polymerics, Inc., changed its name to Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. in
1984 and was reincorporated in Delaware in 1987. On April 2, 1993, the Company
acquired Premier Inc., a marketing and distribution company specializing in
over-the-counter drug and personal care products. The business combination was
accounted for as a pooling of interests.

Products under development or in the marketplace utilize the Company's
Microsponge systems in three primary ways: 1) as reservoirs releasing active
ingredients over an extended period of time, 2) as receptacles for absorbing
undesirable substances, such as excess skin oils, or 3) as closed containers
holding ingredients away from the skin for superficial action. The resulting
benefits include extended efficacy, reduced skin irritation, cosmetic elegance,
formulation flexibility and improved product stability.

In ethical dermatology, New Drug Applications ("NDAs") seeking marketing
clearance on two APS-developed ethical dermatology products have been filed with
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ("FDA"). The first filing in September
1994 was for a melanin-based sun protection cream. The second NDA, which was
submitted in February 1995, was for a prescription acne preparation licensed to
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, a Johnson & Johnson ("J&J") subsidiary.

APS has established several alliances with multinational corporations including
J&J and Rhone-Poulenc Rorer to develop products which incorporate Microsponge
systems. In general, these alliances provide for the client companies to pay the
costs of product development, clinical testing, regulatory approval and
commercialization. In return, the clients receive certain marketing rights to
the products developed. APS typically receives an initial cash infusion, future
payments contingent on the achievement of certain milestones, revenues from the
manufacture of Microsponge systems, and royalty payments based on third party
product sales. J&J and Rhone-


1
5



Poulenc Rorer also have made equity investments in the Company. APS and Dow
Corning Corporation formed a joint venture alliance in 1992 to
develop and commercialize Polytrap(R) and Microsponge systems for the
manufacturers of cosmetics and personal care products. In the first quarter of
1996, APS acquired all rights to the Polytrap technology from Dow Corning in
exchange for 200,000 shares of APS Common Stock.

APS-marketed products utilizing the Microsponge technology include six acne
products sold in the U.S.: Exact(R) Vanishing Cream, Exact Tinted Cream, Exact
Pore Treatment Gel, Exact Adult Acne Cream, Exact Cleansing Wipes and Exact Face
Wash. Another APS product, EveryStep(R) shoe and foot powder which is designed
to eliminate the causes of foot odor, also is marketed in the U.S. In addition,
the Company introduced in 1994 two new formulations of Take-Off make-up/facial
cleansers which have been improved with a Microsponge-based moisturizing system.

Corporate customers are marketing products containing the Company's technology
on a worldwide basis.

To maintain quality control over manufacturing, APS has committed significant
resources to its production processes and polymer systems development programs.
The Company's manufacturing facility in Lafayette, Louisiana, is responsible for
large-scale production of Microsponge systems and related technologies. All
products are manufactured according to Current Good Manufacturing Practices
guidelines ("CGMPs") established by the FDA. In addition, APS has process
development pilot plants in both its Louisiana and California facilities to
handle the production of new technologies. APS also has established
relationships with contract manufacturers, which provide second-source
production capabilities to handle growing product demand. The Company's
objective is to utilize these third parties selectively, so that it can maintain
its flexibility and direct the bulk of APS' capital resources to other areas
such as product development and marketing.

APS TECHNOLOGY

The fundamental appeal of the Company's Microsponge technology stems from the
difficulty experienced with conventional formulations in releasing active
ingredients over an extended period of time. Cosmetics and skin care
preparations are intended to work only on the outer layers of the skin. Yet, the
typical active ingredient in conventional products is present in a relatively
high concentration and, when applied to the skin, may be rapidly absorbed. The
common result is over-medication, followed by a period of under-medication until
the next application. Rashes and more serious side effects can occur when the
active ingredients rapidly penetrate below the skin's surface. APS' Microsponge
technology is designed to allow a prolonged rate of release of the active
ingredients, thereby offering potential reduction in the side effects while
maintaining the therapeutic efficacy.

MICROSPONGE SYSTEMS. The basis of the Company's Microsponge systems are
microscopic, polymer-based microspheres that can bind, suspend or entrap a wide
variety of substances and then be incorporated into a formulated product, such
as a gel, cream, liquid or powder. A single Microsponge is as tiny as a particle
of talcum powder, measuring less than one-thousandth of an inch in diameter.
Like a true sponge, each microsphere consists of a myriad of interconnecting
voids within a non-collapsible structure that can accept a wide variety of
substances. The outer surface is typically porous, allowing the controlled flow
of substances into and out of the sphere.

Several primary characteristics, or parameters, of the Microsponge can be
defined during the production phase to obtain spheres that are tailored to
specific product applications and vehicle compatibility. By altering parameters,
such as material composition, particle size, pore diameter and volume, as well
as the resiliency of the Microsponge, APS is able to optimize the release of
entrapped ingredients in response to a number of "triggers."

2
6



These triggers can include variations in temperature, friction, the volatility
of the entrapped ingredient, the presence of moisture or the passage of time.
The technology can also provide an absorbent Microsponge, a Microsponge that can
both release ingredients and absorb skin oils, or a Microsponge that confines
ingredients, such as melanin, permanently within microspheres. Preselection of
the programmable parameters thus results in a truly "custom-made" Microsponge
designed to meet the specific requirements of the finished product.

Microsponge systems are made of biologically inert polymers. Extensive safety
studies have demonstrated that the polymers are non-irritating, non-mutagenic,
non-allergenic, non-toxic and non-biodegradable. As a result, the human body
cannot convert them into other substances or break them down. Furthermore,
although they are microscopic in size, Microsponge systems are too large to pass
through the stratum corneum (skin surface) when incorporated into topical
products.

BIOADHESIVE MICROSPONGE SYSTEMS (HYDROSPONGE(TM)). The effectiveness of many
topical products could be extended by enabling them to adhere more tightly to
their site of application. To satisfy this need, APS is developing hydrogel
variations of Microsponge systems. Like other Microsponge systems, Hydrosponges
are highly porous and capable of entrapping active ingredients for release over
an extended period of time. However, unlike other Microsponge systems, they are
hydrophilic (have an affinity for water) and can have electric charges that are
either positive or negative. These properties allow entrapped ingredients to
adhere readily to the skin and hair until released by certain types of triggers,
such as soap. They also provide more control over the delivery of certain
entrapped ingredients and can potentially improve the product's aesthetic
qualities.

COATED MICROSPONGE SYSTEMS. A membrane-coated Microsponge system offers the
potential to hold active ingredients in a protected environment and provide
controlled delivery of oral medication to the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract.
The Company's focus is on coatings that will not be removed from the Microsponge
until exposure to new types of triggers, such as internal body fluids. This
approach would open up entirely new opportunities for APS, including oral drug
delivery. Among the possibilities under evaluation are systems for encapsulating
unpleasant-tasting drugs until they enter the stomach or allowing targeted drugs
to remain inactive until reaching their intended site of action (e.g., the small
intestine), where they can then provide continuous, extended release therapy.

SPECIALTY APPLICATIONS. In November 1995, the Company signed an agreement with
biosys, Inc. to supply Microsponge-entrapped pheromones to develop long-lasting
environmentally safe agricultural pest control products. In late 1994, the
Company signed an agreement with The Western Company of North America
("Western") to supply Microsponge systems containing industrial chemicals.
Western found that Microsponge-entrapped industrial chemicals can be used inside
oil wells to allow more cost-efficient recovery of crude oil. While not a
principal focus at Advanced Polymer, a wide range of specialty applications
could benefit from the value-added contribution of our polymer technology.

PRODUCTS

APS is focusing its efforts primarily on the ethical dermatology, OTC skin care
and personal care markets in which Microsponge systems can provide substantial
advantages. Certain additional applications for the Company's technology are
also under development, as noted below.



3
7





ETHICAL DERMATOLOGY

APS defines "ethical dermatology" products as prescription and non-prescription
drugs that are promoted primarily through the medical profession for the
prevention and treatment of skin problems or diseases. The Company is developing
several ethical dermatology products which will require approval of the FDA
before they can be sold in the United States. Although these pharmaceuticals are
likely to take longer to reach the marketplace than OTC and personal care
products, due to the regulatory approval process, the Company believes that the
benefits offered by Microsponge delivery systems will allow valuable product
differentiation in this large and potentially profitable market. Results from
Phase III human clinical studies on two product candidates reaffirm that this
technology offers the potential to reduce the drug side effects, maintain the
therapeutic efficacy and potentially increase patient compliance with the
treatment regimen. The following ethical dermatology products are under
development by APS:

MELANIN-MICROSPONGE SUNSCREEN. Concern about the sun's harmful effects and its
role in aging and skin cancer has resulted in heightened awareness of
preventative measures in the sunscreen market. Recently published scientific
data indicate that conventional sunscreens may not provide complete protection
against UVA rays and their damaging effects on the immune system, which are
thought to be related to malignant melanoma, a potentially fatal cancer of the
skin and other organs. This APS-developed sun protectant is designed to provide
the highest-available protection against the sun's UVA rays as well as
protection from the burning UVB rays.

This unique APS product candidate incorporates the Company's
melanin-Microsponge system containing genetically engineered melanin, a natural
pigment found in skin. The product is designed to evenly distribute melanin
over the skin's surface, and mimic the body's own method of providing
full-spectrum protection from the sun's rays. The melanin-Microsponge
technology already is incorporated into nine personal care products marketed by
Lancaster Group in Europe and APS is developing additional product applications
for itself and for other corporations.

The Company filed its NDA in 1994 for marketing clearance. Since it involves an
entirely new ethical pharmaceutical ingredient and application, the regulatory
review process is lengthier and more complex. The Company is continuing to
provide additional information in response to FDA comments with respect to its
NDA. If approval by the FDA is received, APS expects the product to be marketed
in the United States either by its own sales force or, more likely, through a
strategic alliance with an established company in the field. There can be no
assurance that FDA approval will be received, or that if received, the Company
will be able to successfully market melanin-Microsponge sunscreens.

TRETINOIN ACNE MEDICATION. In February 1995, the Company submitted an NDA on the
use of Microsponge-entrapped tretinoin for improved acne treatment. This
submission to the FDA represented the culmination of an intensive research and
clinical development program involving approximately 1,150 patients. Tretinoin
has been marketed in the U.S. by Ortho Pharmaceutical, a Johnson & Johnson
subsidiary, under the brand name RETIN-A(R) since 1971. It has proven to be a
highly effective topical acne medication. However, skin irritation among
sensitive individuals can limit patient compliance with the prescribed therapy.
The Company believes its patented approach to drug delivery reduces the
potentially irritating side effects of tretinoin. Upon FDA approval, Ortho
Pharmaceutical will market this product. There can be no assurance that FDA
approval will be received, or that if received, that Ortho Pharmaceutical will
be able to successfully market this product.

5-FLUOROURACIL. Another ethical dermatology product candidate,
Microsponge-entrapped 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), was the subject of an
Investigational New Drug ("IND") filing in early 1995. 5-FU is an effective
chemotherapeutic agent for treating actinic keratosis, a pre-cancerous,
hardened-skin condition caused by excessive exposure to sunlight. However,
patient compliance with the treatment regimen is poor, due to significant,
adverse side effects. Through a joint agreement with Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, the
Company is developing a Microsponge-enhanced topical formulation that
potentially offers a less irritating solution for treating actinic keratosis.

TRETINOIN PHOTODAMAGE TREATMENT. Initial product development was undertaken in
1994 to develop a Microsponge system product for the treatment of photodamage,
which contributes to the premature aging of skin and has been implicated in skin
cancer. Funding for this second tretinoin treatment indication is being provided
by J&J's Ortho Pharmaceutical



4
8





subsidiary.

OTC SKIN CARE

EXACT(R) ACNE TREATMENTS. The first of these over-the-counter
Microsponge-entrapped benzoyl peroxide products, Exact Vanishing Cream was
introduced commercially by APS in the third quarter of 1992. During the third
quarter of 1993, APS introduced Exact Tinted Cream, which is an extension of the
vanishing cream. The tinted formula is designed to both provide treatment and
hide pimples. Exact's patented On Demand(TM) system of drug release is designed
to provide a steady, controlled amount of benzoyl peroxide medication to treat
acne without irritating, inflaming or overdrying healthy skin. It also absorbs
excess skin oils to help prevent acne from returning. As demonstrated in a
175-patient clinical study comparing Exact acne cream to the leading
competitive commercial benzoyl peroxide acne product, the controlled release
mechanism of Exact offers equivalent medication efficacy with significantly
less skin irritation. The product is being sold in the United States as a
non-prescription, over-the-counter acne treatment.

During 1995, the Company introduced four line extensions;
Exact Face Wash, Exact Adult Acne Cream, Exact Pore Treatment Gel and Exact
Cleansing Wipes.

TAKE-OFF(R) MAKE-UP/FACIAL CLEANSERS. This is the second major brand of products
using Microsponge systems to provide competitive advantages. Two formulations
are now being marketed under a licensing agreement with J&J.

PERSONAL CARE

POLYMERIC TRANSPORT(R) SYSTEMS. In January 1996, the Company signed a definitive
agreement with Dow Corning Corporation, one of the world's largest suppliers of
ingredients used in cosmetics and personal care products, to acquire full rights
to Dow Corning's Polytrap(R) technology and full responsibility for the
continuing commercialization of Polymeric Transport Systems in exchange for
200,000 shares of APS common stock. APS and Dow Corning previously shared these
rights under an agreement signed in 1991 whereby the two companies shared in the
proceeds from the manufacture and marketing of products based on both APS
Microsponge systems and the Dow Corning Polytrap technologies. As a result,
patented microspheres were commercialized as Polymeric Transport Systems to: 1)
entrap and deliver various ingredients in personal care products, 2) absorb skin
oils to eliminate shine without leaving a white residue, and 3) provide a smooth
and silky feel to product formulations. The first Polymeric Transport Systems
were introduced to industry customers domestically in February 1992 and globally
in June and July 1992. The systems include Microsponge systems with vitamin A,
glycerin, a UV absorber, skin oil absorber or mineral oil, as well as Polytrap
systems containing a polymer powder, cyclomethicone or mineral oil beads.
Customized Polymeric Transport Systems are developed upon request to suit
specific customer needs.

Entrapping cosmetic ingredients in APS' proprietary Microsponge
delivery systems offers several advantages, including improved physical and
chemical stability, greater available concentrations, controlled release of the
active ingredients, reduced skin irritation and sensitization, and unique
tactile qualities. As a result of the APS-Dow Corning alliance, Microsponge
and Polytrap systems are now incorporated into approximately 70 leading
personal care products worldwide. In the U.S., 8 of the 10 largest companies in
the personal care field are using Microsponge systems in lipsticks, face creams
and powders, eyeshadows, moisturizers, cleansers, oil control lotions,
deodorant products, or other primarily cosmetic products.



5
9

APS' trade-marked Microsponge name does not appear on most of these products,
because of the need to protect proprietary positions. Instead, "acrylates
copolymer," a general term for various polymer-based technologies, is listed
among the product ingredients.

NEET(R). Effective September 1995, the Company acquired exclusive U.S. rights to
Neet hair removal products from Reckitt & Colman. Under the licensing agreement,
APS is handling the manufacturing, sales, marketing, distribution and product
development of Neet products in the United States. Neet is a long-established,
multi-million dollar brand of lotions, creams and roll-ons used to remove
unwanted hair from the surface of the skin. The licensing agreement also
provides for a reciprocal exchange of technology between APS and Reckitt and
Colman.

EVERYSTEP(R) FOOT POWDER. In January 1992, APS introduced EveryStep, a unique
shoe and foot deodorant with five active ingredients entrapped in Microsponge
systems. This product is a daily use, continuous-action, odor-fighting powder.

BABY FRESH(R) WITH ULTRA GUARD(R) BABY WIPES. Scott Paper Company, one of APS'
early licensees, has incorporated an APS Microsponge system into a baby wipe to
both cleanse a baby's sensitive skin and help protect against common diaper
rash. Moisture is a major contributor to diaper rash, a painful skin irritation.
Ultra Guard is Scott's trademark for the APS delivery system. Baby Fresh with
Ultra Guard skin protectant is designed to provide effective skin protection
without blocking air from the skin by the controlled release of water-repellent
dimethicone, a substance commonly used in baby creams, lotions and skin
protectants. This product was launched in the U.S. during 1992, and marketing
efforts were expanded in 1993 to include Canada and the United Kingdom. In
addition to the normal supply agreement, APS receives royalty income on
worldwide product sales.

MELANOSPONGE(R) TOILETRIES, COSMETICS AND SUNCARE PRODUCTS. Melanosponge, APS'
trademark for the Microsponge system entrapping genetically engineered melanin,
has been added to a number of premium cosmetic products marketed by Lancaster, a
major European cosmetics manufacturer, in major European markets. These include
an eye cosmetic, a lipstick and a moisturizer commercialized in early 1992, as
well as six additional cosmetic products that offer protection from the sun's
damage.

OTHER PRODUCT APPLICATIONS

While not the principal focus of APS development efforts, other products could
benefit from the value-added application of the Company's polymer technology. To
date, the Company has chosen to apply its technology to the following
non-skin-care fields:

ANALYTICAL STANDARDS. APS initially developed microsphere precursors to the
Microsponge for use as a testing standard for gauging the purity of municipal
drinking water. Marketed by APS nationwide, these microspheres are suspended in
pure water to form an accurate, stable, reproducible turbidity standard for the
calibration of turbidimeters used to test water purity.

APS believes its Analytical Standards technology has much broader applications
than testing the turbidity of water. The Company has begun to develop hematology
standards for industrial use as process monitors in blood plasma manufacturing
and as control materials for blood analysis. The Company is also expanding its
line of visual haze standards for use in the beer industry and is investigating
applications for the paper, semiconductor and pharmaceutical industries which
require the use of ultrapure water.

INDUSTRIAL ENZYMES FOR USE IN OIL WELLS. The Western Company of North
America, which was acquired by BJ Services Company in 1995, has found that
Microsponge- entrapped industrial chemicals can be used inside oil wells to
allow more cost-efficient recovery of crude oil. This innovative industrial
application of our technology has enabled us to enter a potentially significant
new field of supply.


6
10



BIOPESTICIDES. biosys, a company which develops and commercializes
bioinsecticides, conducted extensive studies which showed that the use of the
Microsponge technology with biopesticides could provide long-lasting,
environmentally safe pest control. biosys will use Microsponge systems
to entrap and gradually release non-toxic chemicals called pheromones, which
are normally produced by insects to communicate with one another.
Microsponge-entrapped pheromones mimic insect communication signals so
effectively that targeted insects are unable to distinguish the location of
potential mates in sprayed areas for extended periods of time. Although
unharmed, the insects are prevented from producing offspring that feed on
agricultural crops.


MANUFACTURING

POLYMER RAW MATERIAL. Raw materials for the Company's polymers are
petroleum-based monomers which are widely available at low cost. The monomers
have not been subject to unavailability or significant price fluctuations. Raw
material costs generally account for less than a third of the total cost of the
Company's products.

PROCESS ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT. The Company employs chemical engineers and
operates two pilot-plant facilities for developing production processes. APS has
created process technologies which it believes offer the greatest potential for
application to the widest variety of APS products. The equipment used for
manufacturing and process development is commercially available in industrial
sizes and is installed in the Company's production facility in Lafayette,
Louisiana.

GENETICALLY ENGINEERED MELANIN. Genetically engineered melanin for the
Melanosponge system is provided by Biosource Technologies Inc. ("Biosource")
pursuant to license and supply agreements. Under the terms of these agreements,
APS has worldwide rights to use and sell genetically engineered melanin in
Microsponge systems for all sun protectant, cosmetic, ethical dermatology and
OTC skin care purposes. Biosource is guaranteed minimum purchases, receives
royalties on product sales and has received certain other financial
considerations.

MICROSPONGE PRODUCTION. APS has committed significant resources to the
production process and polymer systems development required to commercialize its
products. The Company has to date manufactured most Microsponge systems in
company-owned and operated facilities.

The Company's manufacturing facility in Lafayette, Louisiana, is responsible for
large-scale production of Microsponge systems and related technologies. APS also
has established relationships with contract manufacturers which provide
second-source production capabilities. The Company's objective is to utilize
these third parties selectively, so that it can maintain its flexibility and
direct the bulk of APS' capital resources to other areas, such as product
development and marketing. All products are manufactured according to CGMP. In
addition, APS has process development pilot plants in both its Louisiana and
California facilities to handle the production of new technologies.

MARKETING

The Company's strategy is to retain marketing or co-promotion rights for most of
its products in the United States and Canada. Outside of North America, APS
initially intends to rely on other companies as partners for marketing,
co-promotion, distribution and/or sales of its products. To date, aside from
Premier, most marketing activities involve the sale of Microsponge systems
directly to corporate customers for whom the Company has performed product
research and development activities.

APS' own products are being commercialized through its wholly owned subsidiary
Premier, Inc., a marketing and distribution company specializing in OTC drug and
personal care products. Premier was acquired by APS in April 1993 in a stock for
stock merger for approximately 450,000 shares of APS Common Stock.

Premier provides APS with its own experienced sales, marketing and distribution
team. The APS-Premier relationship dates back to 1990, when the two companies
incorporated a consumer products company to develop and sell personal care
products. Premier subsequently served as an independent marketer for APS,
launching and building a presence for the Exact and EveryStep products on a
nationwide basis. Premier's capabilities range from launching new products and
securing national distribution channels, to increasing the retail presence of
established



7
11





brands.

Premier, in addition to being the sales and marketing arm of APS, has marketing,
licensing and distribution agreements with Johnson & Johnson. The Company's goal
is to build a strong market position for APS' topical dermatology and personal
care products by providing several products in key market segments. A number of
products including new formulations that incorporate Microsponge delivery
systems are currently marketed by Premier.

Premier also introduced a Microsponge-enhanced version of Take-Off(R) make-up
remover cloths which it markets under a licensing agreement with J&J. This
product is used to remove facial and eye make-up.

Until the first quarter of 1996, Dow Corning marketed Microsponge and
Polytrap systems to manufacturers of personal care products as part of the
Polymeric Transport Systems alliance with APS. The alliance with Dow Corning has
allowed APS to expand the use of its technology in the personal care supply
field without requiring the Company to expand its own sales and marketing
infrastructure. In the first quarter of 1996, APS acquired all rights to the
Polytrap technology from Dow Corning in exchange for 200,000 shares of APS
Common Stock. Sales and marketing in the U.S. became the responsibility of APS.
Dow Corning will continue to serve as the international distributor for these
products.

LICENSE AND TECHNOLOGY-RELATED AGREEMENTS

Part of APS' business strategy is to ally the Company with major strategic
partners. The Company has therefore negotiated several agreements for the
development of Microsponge delivery systems, the supply of entrapped
ingredients, and the marketing of formulated products. To create an incentive
for APS to develop products as quickly as possible, these development and
license agreements provide, in some cases, for substantial payments by the
client companies during the period of product development and test marketing.
Additionally, some agreements provide for non-refundable payments on the
achievement of certain key milestones, royalties on sales of formulated
products, and minimum annual payments to maintain exclusivity. APS has, in some
product areas, retained co-marketing rights.

In general, APS grants limited marketing exclusivity in defined markets to
client companies, while retaining the right to manufacture the Microsponge
delivery systems it develops for these clients. However, after development is
completed and a client commercializes a formulated product utilizing the
Company's delivery systems, APS can exert only limited influence over the manner
and extent of the client's marketing efforts. APS' client companies may cancel
their agreements without penalty.

The Company's material agreements and relationships are set forth below:

JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. In May 1992, APS and Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation, a
subsidiary of J&J, entered into a licensing agreement related to tretinoin-based
products incorporating APS' Microsponge technology. As part of the agreement, in
1992, license fees of $6,000,000 were paid to APS. In addition, Johnson &
Johnson Development Corporation ("JJDC") purchased 723,006 shares of newly
issued APS common stock (amounting to approximately 5% of the Company's then
outstanding shares) for $8,000,000. The license fee provides Ortho with
exclusive distribution or license rights for all Ortho tretinoin products
utilizing the APS Microsponge system. Ortho's exclusivity will continue as long
as certain annual minimum payments are made. In addition, Ortho will pay license
fees and milestone payments over time to APS. Milestone, license and equity
payments to APS have the potential to total $24,000,000 of which approximately
$16,250,000 had been received through December 1995. Because the milestones are
separate for each product candidate, failure of one product to win FDA approval
will not interfere with the potential flow of payments from the other product.
APS will receive royalty payments on



8
12
net product sales worldwide.

During 1991, $1,000,000 was received from J&J's Consumer Products, Inc.
subsidiary for the rights to purchase selected APS products in the fourth or
sixth years after introduction for a predetermined multiple of sales. The first
of these products are EveryStep foot powder and the Exact acne treatment and
cleanser. Other potential products include a topical feminine hygiene product, a
deodorant, and hair and scalp treatment products. J&J may also launch line
extensions of its own products incorporating Microsponge delivery systems upon
payment of certain development fees and royalties to APS.

In 1994, J&J purchased additional shares of newly issued common stock
through its subsidiary JJDC for $5,000,000. JJDC also received 200,000 warrants
exercisable for two years at $12.00 per share. The number of shares issuable
to JJDC was increased to a total of 1,432,101 pursuant to an agreed upon
formula tied to the trading price of APS stock prior to January 1996.

RHONE-POULENC RORER. In March 1992, APS and Rhone-Poulenc Rorer ("RPR")
restructured their 1989 joint venture agreement to give APS more freedom in
developing products. Under the new terms, APS has regained from RPR worldwide
marketing rights to products in the prescription dermatology field, including
the melanin-based sunscreen product in which RPR had invested approximately
$4,000,000 in development costs. APS also gained ownership of a
partially-completed manufacturing facility in Vacaville, California, which the
Company sold in December 1995. Also under the new terms, RPR invested $2,000,000
in cash in APS and relieved APS of the obligation to repay a $1,500,000 advance.
In return, RPR received 705,041 shares of APS stock (approximately 5% of the
Company's then outstanding shares) and maintains a minority share in the
potential net profits of the melanin-based sunscreen product. Furthermore, RPR
has agreed to continue funding the exploration and development of certain
dermatology applications of APS' technology in which APS shares marketing
rights. Product applications include a 5-FU treatment for pre-cancerous actinic
keratosis. In 1995, the Company filed an IND application to begin human clinical
testing of 5-FU. As APS maintains co-marketing rights to these products, the
companies will pay each other reciprocal royalties on product sales.

DOW CORNING. In July 1991, APS and Dow Corning Corporation formed a
collaborative alliance to manufacture and sell both APS' Microsponge and Dow
Corning's Polytrap technologies worldwide in the cosmetics and toiletries field.
Under the agreement, Dow Corning provided financial assistance in this venture,
as well as worldwide sales and support services; APS contributed its technology,
research and development, technical support and manufacturing capability for
both the Microsponge and Polytrap products. As part of its alliance with the
Company, Dow Corning advanced to APS $1,000,000 which was repaid out of the
gross profits of the alliance. In the first quarter of 1996, APS acquired full
rights to the Polytrap(R) technology and full responsibility for the continuing
commercialization of Polymeric Transport Systems in exchange for 200,000 shares
of common stock.

SCOTT PAPER COMPANY. In the first quarter of 1992, after having been one of APS'
original licensees in 1987, Scott Paper Company began the regional U.S. launch
of Baby Fresh with Ultra Guard baby wipes. Ultra Guard is Scott's trademark for
an APS Microsponge system that contains dimethicone to help protect a baby's
skin from diaper rash. In early 1993, Scott achieved national distribution for
Baby Fresh with Ultra Guard. In the fourth quarter of 1995, Kimberly-Clark
announced its intention to acquire Scott Paper Company. This transaction was
completed in the first quarter of 1996. One of the conditions of the acquisition
imposed by the Federal Trade Commission was that Kimberly-Clark divest the baby
wipe business due to the size of the combined business. No buyer for this
business has yet been identified.


9
13





SMITHKLINE BEECHAM. APS' signed a marketing and distribution agreement with
SmithKline Beecham ("SKB") for OraFix denture adhesive, a long-established,
multi-million dollar brand in the third quarter of 1993. The SKB agreement
provided for Premier to handle product sales, marketing and distribution in
return for a management fee. In December 1995, SKB sold the OraFix business to
Hogil Pharmaceutical, Inc., and the agreement with Premier terminated.

BJ SERVICES COMPANY. In late 1994, the Company signed an agreement with the
Western Company of North America to supply Microsponge systems containing
industrial chemicals. Western has found that Microsponge-entrapped industrial
chemicals can be used inside oil wells to allow more cost-efficient recovery
of crude oil. Western was subsequently acquired by BJ Services Company.

GOVERNMENT REGULATION

ETHICAL DERMATOLOGY PRODUCTS

In order to clinically test, produce and sell products for human therapeutic
use, mandatory procedures and safety evaluations established by the FDA and
comparable agencies in foreign countries must be followed. The procedure for
seeking and obtaining the required governmental clearances for a new therapeutic
product includes pre-clinical animal testing to determine safety and efficacy,
followed by human clinical testing, and can take many years and require
substantial expenditures. In the case of third-party agreements, APS expects
that the corporate client will fund the testing and the approval process with
guidance from APS. The Company intends to seek the necessary regulatory
approvals for its proprietary dermatology products as they are being developed.
NDAs on two APS-developed ethical dermatology products have been filed with the
FDA, in September 1994 and February 1995. There can be no assurance that any
such marketing clearances will be granted by the FDA on a timely basis, if at
all, or that approved products will be economically feasible to commercialize.
The FDA also may require post-marketing testing and surveillance programs to
monitor the effects of the Company's products. Following initial marketing,
product approvals may be withdrawn for noncompliance with regulatory standards
or the occurrence of unforeseen problems.

APS' facilities, where the Company manufactures pharmaceutical raw materials,
are subject to periodic governmental inspections. If violations of applicable
regulations are noted during these inspections, significant problems may arise
affecting the continued marketing of any products manufactured by the Company.

While APS does not currently manufacture commercially available pharmaceuticals,
its Lafayette, Louisiana plant continues to operate according to CGMP prescribed
by the FDA, in anticipation of marketing clearance of ethical dermatology
product candidates. This compliance has entailed modifying certain manufacturing
equipment, as well as implementing certain record keeping and other practices
and procedures which are required of all pharmaceutical manufacturers. The
Company believes it is in compliance with federal and state laws regarding
occupational safety, laboratory practices, environmental protection and
hazardous substance control.



10
14





PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS

Under current regulations, the market introduction of non-medicated cosmetics,
toiletries and skin care products does not require prior formal registration or
approval by the FDA or regulatory agencies in foreign countries, although this
situation could change in the future. The cosmetics industry has established
self-regulating procedures and most companies perform their own toxicity and
consumer tests.

PATENTS AND TRADE SECRETS

As part of the Company's strategy to protect its current products and to provide
a foundation for future products, APS has filed a number of United States patent
applications on inventions relating to specific products, product groups, and
processing technology. The Company also has filed foreign patent applications on
its polymer technology with the European Economic Community, Japan, Australia,
South Africa, Canada, Korea and Taiwan. The Company received U.S. patent
protection for its basic Microsponge system concept in 1987 and now has a total
of 18 issued U.S. patents and an additional 63 issued foreign patents. The
Company has over 32 pending patent applications worldwide.

Although the Company believes the bases for these patents and patent
applications are sound, they are untested, and there is no assurance that they
will not be successfully challenged. There can be no assurance that any patent
already issued will be of commercial value, or that any patent applications will
result in issued patents of commercial value, or that APS' technology will not
be held to infringe on patents held by others.

APS relies on unpatented trade secrets and know-how to protect certain aspects
of its production technologies. APS' employees, consultants, advisors and
corporate clients have entered into confidentiality agreements with the Company.
These agreements, however, may not necessarily provide meaningful protection for
the Company's trade secrets or proprietary know-how in the event of unauthorized
use or disclosure. In addition, others may obtain access to, or independently
develop, these trade secrets or know-how.

COMPETITION

Numerous companies, including major chemical and pharmaceutical companies in the
United States, seek to develop products based on enhanced delivery technologies.
The established companies have financial and technical resources and production
and marketing capabilities substantially greater than those of APS. In addition,
most have significantly greater experience in undertaking product and market
tests, clinically testing therapeutic products and obtaining approval of the
regulatory authorities. The Company expects competition to intensify as
technological developments are made and become more widely accepted.

Microsponge systems compete with two time-release drug delivery technologies:
liposomes for the delivery of therapeutic agents and the enmeshing of
therapeutic agents in a polymer polycarbophil. Existing alternatives to APS'
Microsponge delivery systems also include other topical polymeric systems and
encapsulation techniques. The competitive polymeric system most closely related
to the Microsponge is Dow Corning's Polytrap technology which was acquired by
APS in January 1996.

Liposome technologies, which utilize phospholipids, cholesterol or other
lipid-based microscopic spheres for encapsulation, release their entrapped
ingredients only through a diffusion or vehicle degradation process. This
approach has the disadvantage of low payload. Liposomes can be significantly
more expensive than Microsponge systems because their manufacturing requires
ultrapure raw materials while Microsponge systems are produced from widely
available monomers. Liposomes also require strong preservatives to maintain
their microbiological



11
15





stability, while the APS technology requires no preservatives and is
self-sterilizing. Liposomes are primarily directed toward systemic drug
delivery.

Microencapsulation differs significantly from the Company's delivery system
because once a capsule is ruptured or melted, all of the entrapped substance is
released. Furthermore, encapsulation does not offer the same control over
programmability or release of the active ingredients offered by Microsponge
systems.

HUMAN RESOURCES

As of February 29, 1996, the Company had 90 full-time employees, 5 of whom hold
PhDs. There were 17 employees engaged in research and development, 38 in pilot
manufacturing and production activities, and 35 working in sales, finance,
marketing, human resources and administration.

The Company considers its relations with employees to be satisfactory. None of
the Company's employees is covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company currently occupies 23,040 square feet of laboratory, office and
warehouse space in Redwood City, California and 4,800 square feet of office
space in Greenwich, Connecticut. Rent expense for these facilities in 1995 were
$246,194 and $107,444, respectively.

The Company occupies a production facility and warehouse in Lafayette,
Louisiana, with a current annual capacity, depending upon the application, to
produce 500,000 to 750,000 pounds of entrapped materials. The existing plant,
with contiguous acreage, has been designed to allow significant expansion. In
1995, the Company sold this facility and warehouse along with other certain
assets and subsequently leased them back for a certain fixed monthly rent over
a period of forty-eight months. The Company reported this transaction as a
financing transaction since the requirements for consummation of a sale were
not met.

The construction of the facility in 1986 was financed primarily by 15-year
tax-exempt industrial development bonds. In 1990, the bonds were refinanced. The
maturity date of the bonds occurs in installments beginning June 30, 1993, and
ending December 31, 2000. The bonds bear a fixed interest rate of 10%. In 1995,
the Company extinguished the bonds through an "insubstance defeasance"
transaction by placing U.S. government securities in an irrevocable trust to
fund all future interest and principal payments.

In March, 1992, as part of the restructuring of the arrangements with
Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, APS acquired a partially-completed manufacturing facility
in Vacaville, California. APS management decided not to complete the plant,
and the facility was sold in December 1995.

The Company's existing research and development and administrative facilities
are not being used at full capacity and, as such, management believes that such
facilities are adequate and suitable for its current and anticipated needs.
Additional manufacturing capacity could be required as APS expands commercial
production. It is anticipated that any additional production facilities would be
built on land the Company presently occupies in Lafayette, Louisiana.



12
16





ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.



13
17





PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS

Shares of the Company's Common Stock trade on the Nasdaq National Market under
the symbol APOS. As of February 29, 1996, there were 653 holders of record of
the Company's Common Stock.

The company has never paid cash dividends and does not anticipate paying cash
dividends in the foreseeable future. The following table sets forth for the
fiscal periods indicated, the range of high and low closing sales prices for the
Company's Common Stock on the NASDAQ National Market System.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 High Low 1994 High Low
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
First Quarter 6 4 First Quarter 7 3/4 5 1/8
Second Quarter 5 7/8 4 1/16 Second Quarter 7 4 3/4
Third Quarter 8 3/8 5 1/8 Third Quarter 6 1/8 3 5/8
Fourth Quarter 7 1/2 4 7/8 Fourth Quarter 5 7/8 4 1/8
</TABLE>

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Total revenues $ 16,108 $ 15,884 $ 19,932 $ 15,527 $ 4,602
Research and
development, net 4,139 6,334 7,343 3,726 2,211
Selling, marketing and
advertising 6,560 5,669 6,237 4,013 1,394
General and administrative 3,082 2,844 2,988 3,468 2,141
Loss on purchase commitment,
including related inventory 600 685 950 -- --
Net loss (9,359) (9,759) (9,877) (5,545) (4,312)

Loss per common share $ (0.57) $ (0.65) $ (0.73) $ (0.43) $ (0.42)
Weighted average common
shares outstanding 16,459 15,018 13,527 12,805 10,198
</TABLE>


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
BALANCE SHEETS
Working capital $ 4,976 $ 5,641 $ 4,555 $ 14,428 $ 2,103
Total assets 23,082 23,508 24,378 31,115 14,849
Long-term debt, excluding
current portion 6,355 979 3,355 3,672 4,000
Shareholders' equity 5,233 11,786 10,501 20,143 3,061
</TABLE>






14
18





ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
(Dollar amounts are rounded to nearest $1,000)

To the extent that this report discusses financial projections,
information or expectations about our products or markets, or otherwise makes
statements about future events, such statements are forward-looking and are
subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results
to differ materially from the statements made. These include, among others,
uncertainty associated with timely approval and acceptance of new products, the
costs associated with new product introductions, establishment of new corporate
alliances, progress in research and development programs and other risks listed
from time to time in the Company's Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

The Company's revenues are derived principally from product sales, license fees
and royalties. The Company is currently marketing in the United States nine
over-the-counter ("OTC") products based on its patented technology and is
manufacturing and selling Microsponge(R) delivery systems for use by customers
in approximately 70 different cosmetic and personal care products. Under
strategic alliance arrangements entered into with certain multinational
corporations, APS generally receives an initial cash infusion, future milestone
payments, royalties based on third party product sales and revenues from the
supply of Microsponge systems.

The consolidated financial statements for each of the periods presented include
the financial results of Premier, Inc. ("Premier"), a marketing and distribution
company specializing in OTC drug and personal care products, which was acquired
on April 2, 1993. The business combination was accounted for as a pooling of
interests, and the historical financial statements of Advanced Polymer Systems,
Inc., ("APS" or the "Company") have been restated to include the accounts and
results of operations of Premier.

Premier has exclusive arrangements to market and distribute two sunscreen
product lines which do not incorporate the Company's technology, Sundown(R) and
Johnson's Baby Sunblock(R), on behalf of Johnson & Johnson's Consumer Products,
Inc. and has further licensed Take-Off(R) makeup remover from Johnson &
Johnson. In addition, effective September 1995, the Company licensed from
Reckitt & Coleman the exclusive U.S. rights to the Neet(R) line of depilatory
products. The sales of the two sunscreen products and the depilatory product
line are highly seasonal and heavily weighted to the first two calendar quarters
of each year as retailers buy product for the summer season. Additionally,
shipments of Microsponge systems can fluctuate significantly from period to
period since manufacturing plans of, and inventory quantities held by, customers
are beyond the Company's control.

No major capital expenditures are planned in the coming year, since the
Company's manufacturing facilities are complete. Future marketing expenses for
the melanin-Microsponge sun protectant product candidate have not yet been
determined, as the Company is currently exploring various plans for marketing
this product assuming regulatory approval is received, including discussions
with prospective corporate partners. If the Company should bear all of the
marketing costs for the introduction of this product, the anticipated
achievement of profitable operations could be delayed beyond 1997.

Past results are not deemed to be indicative of the future. Assuming FDA
approval of its two NDAs, the Company anticipates revenues from sales of these
products in future years.



15
19







The following tables summarize highlights from the statements of operations
expressed as a percentage change from the prior year and as a percentage of
product revenues.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31, Annual % Change
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS HIGHLIGHTS 1995 1994 1993 95/94 94/93
- ----------------------------------- ---- ---- ---- ----- -----
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Product revenues $15,203,000 $14,787,000 $16,781,000 3% -12%
Licensing revenues 905,000 1,097,000 3,151,000 -18% -65%
------- --------- ---------
Total revenues 16,108,000 15,884,000 19,932,000 1% -20%
Cost of sales 11,047,000 10,149,000 12,840,000 9% -21%
Research and development, net 4,139,000 6,334,000 7,343,000 -35% -14%
Selling and marketing 4,756,000 4,012,000 4,284,000 19% -6%
Advertising and promotion 1,805,000 1,657,000 1,953,000 9% -15%
General and administrative 3,082,000 2,844,000 2,988,000 8% -5%
Loss on purchase commitments, including
related inventory 600,000 685,000 950,000 -12% -28%
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS HIGHLIGHTS 1995 1994 1993
- ----------------------------------- ---- ---- ----
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Expenses expressed as a percentage of product revenues:
Cost of sales 73% 69% 77%
Research and development, net 27% 43% 44%
Selling and marketing 31% 27% 26%
Advertising and promotion 12% 11% 12%
General and administrative 20% 19% 18%
Loss on purchase commitments, including 4% 5% 6%
related inventory
</TABLE>

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1994

Total revenues for 1995 amounted to $16,108,000 compared to $15,884,000 in the
prior year, an increase of $224,000 or 1%. This consisted of product sales of
$15,203,000, an increase of $416,000 or 3% over the prior year, and licensing
revenues of $905,000, a decrease of $192,000 or 18% from the prior year.

Revenues from products which incorporate the Microsponge technology totalled
$10,458,000, an increase of $3,787,000 or 57% over the prior year.

The increase in product revenues over 1994 resulted from increased shipments of
Microsponge systems to a variety of personal care and specialty customers,
primarily manufacturers of cosmetics and toiletries through the alliance with
Dow Corning Corporation.

This increase was offset by a slight decrease in sales of consumer
products. While sales of the Exact(R) acne line increased by 71% over the prior
year and the addition of the line of Neet(R) products under a licensing
agreement with Reckitt & Colman also contributed to sales of consumer products,
this was offset by an anticipated decrease in sales of in-licensed suncare
products, which do not incorporate the Company's technology. The Company
anticipates decreases in sales of suncare products to continue as it focuses
greater effort on products which contain the Company's Microsponge system.

The decrease in licensing fees was due mainly to the fact that the prior year
included $894,000 of



16
20


revenues recognized under the percentage-of-completion method on now-completed
clinical trials, offset by a milestone payment of $1,500,000 paid to the Company
by Johnson & Johnson upon the filing of the New Drug Application for
Microsponge-enhanced tretinoin acne cream in February 1995, of which $750,000
was recognized as revenues.

The gross profit on product revenues for the year decreased to 27% from 31% due
to a higher percentage of close-out sales of suncare products, partially offset
by improved gross profit on the supply of Microsponge systems.

Research and development expense decreased significantly from $6,334,000 to
$4,139,000, or by 35%, due to the fact that the prior year included significant
external expenses associated with clinical trials for NDAs which have now been
filed.

Selling and marketing expense increased by $744,000 or 19% to $4,756,000 due
mainly to the Company's investment in the initiation of its ethical
pharmaceutical marketing effort. Advertising and promotion expense increased by
$148,000 or 9% to $1,805,000 largely due to a sampling program related to the
Company's consumer products, the benefits of which should be realized in 1996,
partially offset by reduced spending on print media.

General and administrative expense increased by $238,000 or 8% to $3,082,000 due
mainly to increased spending on a variety of outside services.

The loss on purchase commitment primarily relates to a contractual commitment
for the purchase of melanin in excess of current estimated requirements. Melanin
is the key ingredient in the manufacture of the APS-developed UVA/UVB sun
protection cream for which an NDA was filed in the third quarter of 1994.

Interest income decreased by $38,000 or 11% to $318,000 due mainly to lower
average cash balances. Interest expense increased by $167,000 or 60% to $446,000
due to the debt financing arranged by the Company in the third quarter.

The net loss for the year of $9,359,000 was lower by $400,000 or 4% than the
prior year, with reduced research and development expense being offset by
increased selling and marketing expense and reduced gross profit.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994 AND 1993

Revenues for 1994 totalled $15,884,000, consisting of product revenues of
$14,787,000 and licensing revenues of $1,097,000. This represented an overall
decrease of 20% from the prior year. Product revenues decreased by 12% while
licensing revenues decreased by 65%.



17
21





The decrease in product revenues was due mainly to a reduction in shipments to
Scott Paper Company arising principally in the second quarter of 1994. This was
compounded by the absence in 1994 of a $766,000 non-recurring sale of analytical
standards equipment that occurred in 1993. Overall revenues from consumer
products including commissions increased by 2% over the prior year. Shipments of
APS-marketed consumer products decreased slightly by $277,000 or 3% in 1994 due
mainly to a decrease in sales of suncare products. This was partially offset by
a modest increase in shipments of Take-Off makeup remover which was
reintroduced in the second half of the year as a Microsponge-enhanced product.
Sales of the Exact OTC acne treatment were essentially flat with the prior year,
which included initial stocking orders of two line extensions introduced during
the year.

Licensing revenues decreased to $1,097,000 from $3,151,000. The prior year
included a milestone payment of $750,000 received from Johnson & Johnson, Inc.
on a photodamage product and revenue of $2,106,000 which was recognized in
accordance with the percentage-of-completion method of accounting on milestone
payments received from J&J in the prior year. Revenues in 1994 included the
balance remaining under the percentage-of-completion method of $894,000.

Gross profit for the year on product sales amounted to $4,638,000 compared to
$3,941,000 in the prior year. Expressed as a percentage of product revenues,
gross profit increased by eight percentage points over the prior year to 31%.
This is attributable to increased manufacturing efficiencies at the Company's
facility in Lafayette, Louisiana, and to the fact that higher margin consumer
product sales represented a greater portion of overall product revenues.

Research and development expense decreased compared to the prior year by
$1,009,000 or 14% due both to cost-containment measures implemented in the
fourth quarter of 1993 and reduced expenditures on clinical trials. This latter
trend is expected to continue. The Company submitted its NDA for its UVA/UVB
sun protection cream in September of 1994 and a second NDA for its tretinoin
acne treatment in February 1995.

Selling and marketing expense decreased in 1994 by $272,000 or 6% due mainly to
reduced overhead expense at the Company's consumer products and analytical
standards divisions. Advertising and promotion costs decreased by $296,000 or
15% to $1,657,000 as the Company moved from the more expensive print advertising
to other forms of media, mainly point-of-sale. Advertising and promotion costs
associated with current products and those to be launched in the future
will depend on market sizes and perceived opportunities.

General and administrative expense decreased by $144,000 or 5% due mainly to
continuing cost control measures.



18
22





The loss on purchase commitment and inventory primarily relates to a contractual
commitment for the purchase of melanin in excess of current estimated
requirements. Melanin is a key ingredient in the manufacture of the APS
developed UVA/UVB sun protection cream.

Interest income decreased to $356,000 from $560,000 in the prior year due to
lower average cash balances. Other income decreased because the prior year
included gains on disposal of equipment which the Company acquired as a result
of the restructuring of its agreements with Rhone-Poulenc Rorer.

The Company incurred a net loss of $9,759,000 for the year ended 1994. This was
slightly below the loss of $9,877,000 in the prior year with lower sales offset
by a better gross profit mix and reduced operating expenses.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Total assets as of December 31, 1995 were $23,082,000 compared with $23,508,000
at December 31, 1994. Working capital decreased to $4,976,000 at December 31,
1995 from $5,641,000 at December 31, 1994. In the same period, cash and cash
equivalents and marketable securities increased to $5,173,000 from $4,517,000.
The Company's primary investment objectives for those assets are the
preservation of capital and the maintenance of a high degree of liquidity.

The Company has financed its operations, including product research and
development, from amounts raised in debt and equity financings, the sale of
consumer products, Microsponge delivery systems and analytical standard
products; payments received under licensing agreements; and interest earned on
short-term investments.

The Company raised $9,117,000 from two private placements in 1994, and
$1,388,000 from a private placement in the first quarter of 1995.

In September 1995, the Company extinguished $2,500,000 of Industrial Revenue
Bonds through an "insubstance defeasance" transaction by placing approximately
$2,500,000 of U.S. government securities in an irrevocable trust to fund all
future interest and principal payments. The purchase of the government
securities was achieved through the sale of the Company's pledged marketable
securities. The debt extinguishment did not have a material impact on the
Company's earnings.

Also in the second half of 1995, the Company raised an aggregate amount of
$8,122,000 from three financing agreements. The first financing arrangement is a
bank loan totalling $3,000,000 with an interest rate equal to two percentage
points above the Prime Rate. The loan is secured by the assets and operating
cash flows of a subsidiary of the Company and guaranteed by the Company. The
second financing arrangement is a $1,500,000 term loan with a fixed interest
rate of 14%. This loan is also secured by the assets and operating cash flows of
a subsidiary of the Company and guaranteed by the Company. The security interest
of the debt holders is subordinated to the bank loan's security



19
23





interest. The third financing arrangement, aggregating $3,622,000, resulted
from the sale of certain real and personal properties that the Company
subsequently leased back for a fixed rental stream over a period of forty-eight
months. The Company reported this transaction as a financing transaction since
the requirements for consummation of a sale were not met. The effective
interest rate of this financing is approximately 11%.

During 1995, Company operations used approximately $8,520,000 of cash.
Approximately $4,139,000 was invested in product research and development and
$1,805,000 was invested in advertising and promoting new products.

In prior years, cash was expended with regard to Phase III clinical tests of
tretinoin entrapped in a Microsponge delivery system for the treatment of acne,
and of APS' melanin-Microsponge sunscreen product, together with related
research and development costs, all of which decreased substantially in 1995
following the filing of the respective NDAs. Additionally, the Company is
contractually obligated to purchase minimum annual quantities of melanin.
Failure to purchase the minimum quantities results in a mandatory payment of
$600,000 to its melanin supplier under "take or pay" provisions. In February
1995, the Company received a milestone payment of $1,500,000 from Ortho
Pharmaceutical Corporation upon the filing of its NDA on the tretinoin acne
treatment.

Additionally, in 1995 the Company received $748,000 from the sale of an idle
facility in Vacaville, California. The Company recorded a loss on the sale of
approximately $126,000.

The Company's existing cash and cash equivalents, collections of trade accounts
receivable, together with interest income and other revenue producing activities
including milestone payments, are expected to be sufficient to meet the
Company's near-term cash requirements assuming no changes to existing business
plans. The Company is also currently developing a variety of opportunities which
would generate additional funds including joint ventures, equity financings,
licensing agreements and other financing activities.

In the unlikely event that the Company is unable to raise additional funds
required to finance its operations, operating costs will have to be
significantly reduced by decreasing spending on advertising and promotion
activities, outside clinical programs and a variety of other discretionary
external expenditures.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARD

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation", must be adopted for years beginning after December 15, 1995. This
standard defines a fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based
employee compensation plans; however, it also allows an entity to continue to
measure compensation cost for those plans using the provisions of APB Opinion
No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("Opinion 25"). Under the
fair value based method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based
on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which
is usually the vesting period. Under Opinion 25, compensation cost is recognized
based on the difference, if any, between the market price of the stock and the
amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Entities



20
24





electing to remain with the accounting in Opinion 25 must make pro forma
disclosures of net income and earnings per share, as if the fair value method
defined in this standard had been applied. The Company has elected to continue
accounting for compensation cost arising from its stock-based compensation plans
under the Opinion 25 approach, and will therefore present the pro forma
disclosures required by the standard in its financial statements for the year
ending December 31, 1996.



21
25





Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
December 31, 1995 1994
ASSETS
Current Assets:
<S> <C> <C>
Cash and cash equivalents $ 5,172,809 $ 2,741,994
Marketable securities -- 1,775,502
Pledged marketable securities -- 1,945,620
Accounts receivable less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$68,650 and $66,564 at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively 2,436,815 1,887,388
Accrued interest receivable 16,473 26,043
Inventory 7,858,584 7,002,026
Prepaid expenses and other 985,199 1,006,130
------------ ------------
Total current assets 16,469,880 16,384,703
Property and equipment, net 5,027,034 5,106,525
Assets held for sale -- 923,436
Deferred loan costs, net 832,324 52,685
Prepaid license fees, net 303,638 441,506
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $616,387 and $455,590
at December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively 187,596 348,393
Other long-term assets 261,770 250,914
------------ ------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 23,082,242 $ 23,508,162
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 3,240,807 $ 2,584,161
Accounts payable, Johnson & Johnson 4,229,637 3,570,525
Accrued expenses 1,819,541 1,731,545
Accrued melanin purchase commitments 600,000 657,248
Current portion - long-term debt 853,987 2,200,000
Deferred revenue 750,000 --
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 11,493,972 10,743,479
Long-term debt 6,354,969 978,935
------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES 17,848,941 11,722,414
------------ ------------

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, authorized 2,500,000 shares; none issued or
outstanding at December 31, 1995 and 1994 -- --
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 50,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 16,594,565 and 16,043,121 at
December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively 165,946 160,431
Common stock to be issued, $.01 par value, 432,101 shares
issuable in 1996 4,321 --
Warrants, issued and outstanding: 1,628,611 at December 31, 1995
and 2,286,658 at December 31, 1994 2,653,076 4,059,500
Additional paid-in capital 64,600,516 60,297,027
Unrealized gain on securities 12,348 113,166
Accumulated deficit (62,202,906) (52,844,376)
------------ ------------
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY 5,233,301 11,785,748
------------ ------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 23,082,242 $ 23,508,162
============ ============
</TABLE>

See accompanying notes



22
26





Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Years Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Revenues:
Product revenues $ 15,203,196 $ 14,787,048 $ 16,780,598
Licensing revenues 905,000 1,097,402 3,151,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Total revenues 16,108,196 15,884,450 19,931,598

Expenses:
Cost of sales 11,047,399 10,149,302 12,840,205
Research and development, net 4,139,441 6,334,168 7,342,601
Selling and marketing 4,755,788 4,011,752 4,283,657
Advertising and promotion 1,804,540 1,657,178 1,953,042
General and administrative 3,081,900 2,844,282 2,988,284
Loss on purchase commitment, including related inventory 600,000 685,000 950,000
------------ ------------ ------------
Operating loss (9,320,872) (9,797,232) (10,426,191)

Other income (expense), net 89,895 (38,593) 288,929
Interest income 317,948 355,837 560,104
Interest expense (445,501) (278,988) (299,973)
------------ ------------ ------------
Net loss $ (9,358,530) $ (9,758,976) $ (9,877,131)
============ ============ ============
Loss per common share $ (0.57) $ (0.65) $ (0.73)
============ ============ ============
Weighted average common shares outstanding 16,459,446 15,017,753 13,527,207
============ ============ ============
</TABLE>


See accompanying notes.



23
27





Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended
December 31, 1995, 1994, 1993 Common Stock Additional Unrealized
Common Stock Warrants Paid-In Holding
Shares Amount Shares Amount Capital Gain
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Balance December 31, 1992 13,440,654 $ 134,406 1,161,500 $ 2,300,000 $ 50,790,569 $ --

Options exercised 211,639 2,117 -- -- 321,221 --
Shares retired (5,636) (56) -- -- (34,449) --
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- --
Distributions -- -- -- -- -- --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1993 Total 206,003 2,061 -- -- 286,772 --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance December 31, 1993 13,646,657 $ 136,467 1,161,500 $ 2,300,000 $ 51,077,341 $ --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Options exercised 471,306 4,713 -- -- 1,881,821 --
Agreement with Johnson &
Johnson, net of $30,201 in
offering costs 1,000,000 10,000 200,000 285,000 4,674,799 --
Private placement,
net of $353,183 in offering costs 925,158 9,251 925,158 1,474,500 2,663,066 --
Unrealized holding gain -- -- -- -- -- 113,166
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- --
Distributions -- -- -- -- -- --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1994 Total 2,396,464 23,964 1,125,158 1,759,500 9,219,686 113,166
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance December 31, 1994 16,043,121 $ 160,431 2,286,658 $ 4,059,500 $ 60,297,027 $ 113,166
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Options exercised 236,992 2,370 -- -- 1,078,929 --
Private placement,
net of $112,383 in offering costs 310,278 3,103 310,278 485,591 898,923 --
Securities issued in debt financing
arrangements 4,174 42 193,175 407,985 29,958 --
Common Stock to be issued in
connection with the agreement
with Johnson & Johnson 432,101 4,321 -- -- (4,321) --
Warrants expired -- -- (1,161,500) (2,300,000) 2,300,000 --
Unrealized holding gain -- -- -- -- -- (100,818)
Net loss -- -- -- -- -- --
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1995 Total 983,545 9,836 (658,047) (1,406,424) 4,303,489 (100,818)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance December 31, 1995 17,026,666 $ 170,267 1,628,611 $ 2,653,076 $ 64,600,516 $ 12,348
====================================================================================
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the Years Ended
December 31, 1995, 1994, 1993 Total
Accumulated Shareholders'
Deficit Equity
<S> <C> <C>
Balance December 31, 1992 $(33,081,570) $ 20,143,405

Options exercised -- 323,338
Shares retired -- (34,505)
Net loss (9,877,131) (9,877,131)
Distributions (53,699) (53,699)
-----------------------------
1993 Total (9,930,830) (9,641,997)
-----------------------------
Balance December 31, 1993 $(43,012,400) $ 10,501,408
-----------------------------

Options exercised -- 1,886,534
Common stock to be issued
in connection with agreement
with Johnson & Johnson, net
of $30,201 in offering costs -- 4,969,799
Private placement,
net of $353,183 in offering costs -- 4,146,817
Unrealized holding gain -- 113,166
Net loss (9,758,976) (9,758,976)
Distributions (73,000) (73,000)
-----------------------------
1994 Total (9,831,976) 1,284,340
-----------------------------
Balance December 31, 1994 $(52,844,376) $ 11,785,748
-----------------------------

Options exercised -- 1,081,299
Private placement,
net of $112,383 in offering costs -- 1,387,617
Securities issued in debt financing
arrangements -- 437,985
Common stock to be issued in
connection with the agreement
with Johnson & Johnson -- --
Warrants expired -- --
Unrealized holding gain -- (100,818)
Net loss (9,358,530) (9,358,530)
-----------------------------
1995 Total (9,358,530) (6,552,447)
-----------------------------
Balance December 31, 1995 $(62,202,906) $ 5,233,301
=============================
</TABLE>


See accompanying notes.



24
28





Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Years Ended December 31, 1995 1994 1993
<S> <C> <C> <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $ (9,358,530) $ (9,758,976) $ (9,877,131)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 1,377,614 1,243,906 1,202,230
Provision for loss on purchase commitments, including inventory 600,000 685,000 850,000
Change in allowance for doubtful accounts 2,086 (69,456) 106,888
Accretion of pledged long-term marketable securities (121,572) (150,498) (138,243)
(Gain) loss on sale of equipment and assets held for sale 125,764 (868) (195,914)
Gain on sale of pledged marketable securities (234,319) -- --
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (1,130,448) 908,738 (1,116,787)
Accrued interest receivable 9,570 6,981 172,009
Inventory (856,558) 1,291,126 (5,065,950)
Prepaid expenses and other 20,931 (575,003) (419,645)
Deferred charges loan costs (439,824) -- --
Other long-term assets (10,856) 17,895 (20,704)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 87,394 517,005 1,603,855
Accounts payable, Johnson & Johnson 659,112 (1,852,753) 3,205,707
Deferred revenue 750,000 (894,000) (2,106,000)
--------------------------------------------
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES (8,519,636) (8,630,903) (11,799,685)
--------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment (901,288) (645,899) (1,220,185)
Proceeds from sale of equipment and assets held for sale 797,672 2,290 518,667
Purchases of marketable securities (4,458,891) (1,448,467) (6,540,855)
Maturities and sales of marketable securities 5,935,087 1,216,394 18,063,192
--------------------------------------------
NET CASH PROVIDED FROM (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES 1,372,580 (875,682) 10,820,819
--------------------------------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Repayment to Dow Corning -- (274,208) (98,391)
Repayment of long-term debt (258,304) (200,000) (200,000)
Proceeds from long-term debt and warrants 7,367,259 -- --
Proceeds from private placement, net of offering costs 1,387,617 4,146,817 --
Proceeds from agreement with Johnson & Johnson -- 4,969,799 --
Distributions -- (73,000) (53,699)
Proceeds from the exercise of common stock options,
net of common stock retired 1,081,299 1,886,534 288,833
--------------------------------------------
NET CASH PROVIDED FROM (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES 9,577,871 10,455,942 (63,257)
--------------------------------------------

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 2,430,815 949,357 (1,042,123)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 2,741,994 1,792,637 2,834,760
--------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year $ 5,172,809 $ 2,741,994 $ 1,792,637
============================================
</TABLE>


Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing transactions:

In September 1995, the Company offset its note payable to Dow Corning
Corporation ("DCC") against its receivable from DCC. This resulted in a
decrease in long-term debt, short-term debt and accounts receivable of
$478,935, $100,000 and $578,935, respectively.

In September 1995, the Company extinguished a debt through an insubstance
defeasance transaction by placing U.S. government securities in an
irrevocable trust to fund all future scheduled payments on the debt (Note
7).

See accompanying notes.



25
29





ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993

NOTE 1 BUSINESS

Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. ("APS" or the "Company") develops, manufactures
and sells patented delivery systems that allow for the controlled release of
active ingredients in a programmed manner in the ethical dermatology, cosmetic
and personal care areas. Certain projects are conducted under development and
licensing arrangements with large companies, others are part of joint ventures
in which APS is a major participant, and a number of projects are exclusive to
APS. APS also markets and distributes a range of in-licensed consumer products
for personal care through its subsidiary, Premier, Inc. ("Premier").

NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the
financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Premier,
APS Analytical Standards and APS Joint Venture Corporation. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

On April 2, 1993, APS acquired Premier, a marketing and distribution company
specializing in over-the-counter drug and personal care products. The business
combination was accounted for as a pooling of interests and, accordingly, the
Company's historical consolidated financial statements have been restated to
include the accounts and results of Premier for all periods presented.

Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities: For purposes of the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows and Consolidated Balance Sheets, the Company considers
all short-term investments that have original maturities of less than three
months to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments consist primarily of
certificates of deposit, commercial paper, master notes and repurchase
agreements. Investments which have original maturities longer than three months
are classified as marketable securities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The Company has classified its investments in certain debt and equity
securities as "available-for-sale". Such investments are recorded at fair value
with unrealized holding gains and losses reported as a separate component of
stockholders' equity.

Inventory: Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market value, utilizing
the average cost method (Note 5).

Property and Equipment: Property and equipment are carried at cost. Depreciation
is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the assets, not exceeding twenty years (Note 6).

Prepaid License Fees: The fee paid in 1992 to ROCEP Pressure Packs of Scotland
for the exclusive right to supply the Microsponge delivery system in an
environmentally friendly aerosol is being amortized over the five-year length of
the contract on a straight-line basis. The fee paid to Biosource Technologies,
Inc. ("Biosource") in 1992 is being amortized over a seven-year term consistent
with the term of the related minimum purchase commitments (Notes 3 and 8).
Amortization of prepaid license fees totalled $137,868, $124,057 and $120,244
in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.

Deferred Charges: Deferred Charges relate to costs incurred in obtaining certain
loans. These charges are being amortized over the life of the loans using the
effective interest method (Note 7).

Long-Lived Assets, Including Goodwill: In accordance with SFAS No. 121,
"Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to
be Disposed Of", the Company evaluates whether changes have occurred that would
require revision of the remaining estimated lives of recorded long-lived assets,
including goodwill, or render those assets not recoverable. If such
circumstances arise, recoverability is determined by comparing the undiscounted
net cash flows of long-lived assets to their respective recorded net book
values. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based on the projected
discounted cash flows using an appropriate discount rate. At this time, the
Company believes that no significant impairment of long-lived assets, including
goodwill, has occurred and that no reduction of the estimated useful lives of
such assets is warranted.

In 1992, APS acquired for 157,894 shares of its common stock, the outstanding
25% interest in ACP, APS' over-the-counter



26
30





consumer products subsidiary. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase.
Excess of cost over net assets acquired arising from the purchase is being
amortized over five years on a straight-line basis. Amortization of goodwill
totalled $160,797, $160,796, and $160,797 in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.

Advertising and Promotion Costs: Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.

Earnings (Loss) per Share: Earnings (loss) per common share are based on the
weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding
during each year. The computation assumes that no outstanding stock options and
warrants were exercised as they would be anti-dilutive.

Licensing Agreements: The Company has several licensing agreements that
generally provide for monthly payments, periodic minimum payments and royalties
for exclusivity. Revenue is recorded as services are performed. The agreements
do not contain any financial obligations with respect to the Company at the
expiration or earlier termination of the agreements. Certain agreements also
require the remittance of non-refundable milestone fees. Such fees and option
payments aggregated $750,000, $0 and $750,000 in 1995, 1994 and 1993,
respectively.

Deferred Revenue: Prepaid royalties paid to APS by Ortho Pharmaceutical
Corporation ("Ortho"), a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson Inc. ("J&J"), as part
of the retinoid licensing agreement are reported as deferred revenues. (Note 12)

Concentrations of Credit Risk: Financial instruments which potentially expose
the Company to concentrations of credit risk, as defined by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 105, consist primarily of trade accounts
receivable. As of December 31, 1995, approximately 43% of the recorded trade
receivables were concentrated with three customers in the cosmetic and personal
care industries. To reduce credit risk, the Company performs ongoing credit
evaluations of its customers' financial conditions. The Company does not
generally require collateral.

Reclassifications: Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year
financial statements to conform with the presentation in 1995.

NOTE 3 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

APS has entered into agreements with Biosource. Two directors serve on the Board
of Directors of both Biosource and APS. All agreements between APS and Biosource
have been, and will continue to be, considered and approved by a vote of the
disinterested directors. The agreements provide APS worldwide rights to use and
sell Biosource's biologically-synthesized melanin in Microsponge systems for all
sun protection, cosmetic, ethical dermatology and over-the-counter skin care
purposes. In return, APS is required to make annual minimum purchases of melanin
(Note 8), pay royalties on sales of APS melanin-Microsponge products and was
required to prepay $500,000 of royalties. During 1995, the Company paid
Biosource $3,329 in royalties and accrued $600,000 for estimated loss on future
purchase commitments. During 1994, APS paid Biosource $3,279 prepaid royalties
and $263,403 for the supply of melanin. The 1994 financial results also included
a $685,000 provision for the estimated loss on certain future purchase
commitments and related inventory on hand for product in excess of estimated
requirements. During 1993, the Company paid or accrued $893,485 for the supply
of melanin, an additional $200,000 to meet the annual minimum purchase
commitment, and $40,820 for royalties on product sales. The 1993 financial
results also included a $750,000 provision for the estimated loss on certain
future purchase commitments and related inventory on hand for product in excess
of estimated requirements.



27
31

NOTE 4 CASH EQUIVALENTS AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES

At December 31, 1995 and 1994, the amortized cost and estimated market value of
investments in debt securities are set forth in the tables below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1995
----------------------------------------------------
Unrealized Unrealized Estimated
Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
----------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Available-for-Sale:
Corporate debt securities $3,273,602 $ 12,348 - $3,285,950
Other debt securities 164,425 -- - 164,425
----------------------------------------------------
Totals $3,438,027 $ 12,348 - $3,450,375
====================================================
</TABLE>
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1994
----------------------------------------------------
Unrealized Unrealized Estimated
Cost Gains Losses Fair Value
----------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Available-for-Sale:

U.S. Government debt securities $2,132,604 $101,682 - $2,234,286
Corporate debt securities 1,555,352 11,484 - 1,566,836
Other debt securities 1,945,453 -- - 1,945,453
----------------------------------------------------
Totals $5,633,409 $113,166 - $5,746,575
====================================================
</TABLE>

The table below reflects the balance sheet classification of investments in debt
securities at December 31:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fair Fair
Cost Value Cost Value
-------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
Cash equivalents $3,438,027 $3,450,375 $2,025,453 $2,025,453
Marketable securities -- -- 1,761,139 1,775,502
Pledged marketable securities -- -- 1,846,817 1,945,620
-------------------------------------------------------------
Totals $3,438,027 $3,450,375 $5,633,409 $5,746,575
=============================================================
</TABLE>


Available-for-sale debt securities as of December 31, 1995,
are all due in less than three months.

NOTE 5 INVENTORY

The major components of inventory are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, December 31,
1995 1994
---------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Raw materials and work-in-process $1,006,847 $1,019,427
Finished goods 6,851,737 5,982,599
---------------------------
Total inventory $7,858,584 $7,002,026
===========================
</TABLE>

J&J has a security interest in the Company's Sundown(R) and Johnson's Baby
Sunblock(R) inventory. Inventory subject to their security interest totalled
approximately $4,400,000 and $3,600,000 at December 31, 1995 and 1994,
respectively (Note 14).

NOTE 6 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consist of the following:



28
32





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, December 31,
1995 1994
--------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Building $ 1,610,339 $ 1,594,979
Land and improvements 163,519 163,519
Leasehold improvements 571,223 571,223
Furniture and equipment 10,623,203 9,737,275
--------------------------------
Total property and equipment $ 12,968,284 $ 12,066,996
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (7,941,250) (6,960,471)
--------------------------------
Property and equipment, net $ 5,027,034 $ 5,106,525
================================
</TABLE>

Depreciation expense amounted to $980,779, $920,871 and $880,236 for the years
ended December 31, 1995, 1994, and 1993, respectively.

In 1992, the Company obtained ownership of a manufacturing facility as part of a
settlement of a joint venture. The Company sold this facility in 1995 and
recorded a loss on the sale of approximately $126,000.

NOTE 7 LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, December 31,
1995 1994
------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
Bank loan, interest payable monthly, principal due in non-equal installments
commencing December 1, 1996 through March 1, 1999, secured by the assets and
operating cash flow of a subsidiary of the Company and guaranteed by the Company $3,000,000 $ --

Term loan, subordinated to bank loan, interest payable quarterly, principal due
in non-equal installments commencing December 1, 1996 through March 1, 1999,
secured by the assets and operating cash flows of a subsidiary of the Company
and guaranteed by the Company 1,500,000 --

Term loan, principal and interest due in equal monthly installments commencing
October 1995 through December 1999, secured by certain real and personal property 2,708,956 --

Industrial Revenue Bonds, interest payable quarterly, principal due in non-equal
semi-annual installments, commencing June 30, 1993, through December 31, 2000,
secured by pledged marketable securities, and certain real and personal property -- 2,600,000

Advance from Dow Corning Corporation, non-interest bearing, to be repaid out of
the gross profits of certain future sales, but in no case later than December
11, 1996, subordinated to the Industrial Revenue Bonds, notes payable, and
secured by certain real and personal property -- 578,935
---------------------------
Total $7,208,956 $3,178,935
Less current portion 853,987 2,200,000
---------------------------
Long-term debt $6,354,969 $ 978,935
===========================
</TABLE>










29
33





Maturities of the long-term debt are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Years ending December 31: Amount
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C>
1996 $ 853,987
1997 1,470,780
1998 2,473,389
1999 2,410,800
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
$7,208,956
=====================================================================
</TABLE>

In 1995, the Company received an aggregate amount of $8,122,334 from three
financing arrangements.

The first financing arrangement is a $3,000,000 bank loan with an interest rate
equal to two percentage points above the Prime Rate (8.5% as of December 31,
1995). The loan is secured by the assets and operating cash flows of a
subsidiary of the Company and guaranteed by the Company.

The second financing arrangement is a $1,500,000 term loan with a syndicate of
lenders and a fixed interest rate of 14%. The loan is also secured by the assets
and operating cash flows of a subsidiary of the Company and guaranteed by the
Company. The security interest of the debt holders is subordinated to the bank
loan's security interest.

In the third quarter of 1995, the Company consummated a transaction whereby
certain real and personal properties were sold to a third party and subsequently
leased back for a fixed rental stream over a period of forty-eight months. The
Company has the option either to purchase all the properties at the expiration
of the term of the lease or extend the term of the lease. The Company reported
this transaction as a financing transaction since the requirements for
consummation of a sale were not met. A deposit of $755,000 with the lender was
offset against the loan balance as of December 31, 1995. This deposit earns an
interest rate of 4%. This transaction has been reflected in the table above as a
term loan.

The terms of certain financing agreements contain among other provisions,
requirements for a subsidiary of the Company to maintain defined levels of
earnings, net worth and various financial ratios, including net worth. In
conjunction with the debt financing agreements, APS issued a total of 193,175
warrants with an exercise price of $7.00 per share of common stock.

All costs incurred in obtaining the financing arrangements have been capitalized
as deferred charges, and are being amortized over the life of the loans using
the effective interest method. Interest paid in 1995, 1994 and 1993 approximated
interest expense reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

In September 1995, the Company extinguished $2,500,000 of Industrial Revenue
Bonds through an "insubstance defeasance" transaction by placing approximately
$2,500,000 of U.S. government securities in an irrevocable trust to fund all
future interest and principal payments. The purchase of the government
securities was achieved through the sale of the Company's pledged marketable
security. The debt extinguishment did not have a material impact on the
Company's earnings. The debt balance outstanding as of December 31, 1995 was
$2,500,000.

In 1995, the Company offset its note payable to Dow Corning Corporation ("DCC")
against its receivable from DCC as agreed by both companies.

NOTE 8 COMMITMENTS

Lease Commitments: Total rental expense for property and equipment was $639,807,
$558,086 and $578,208 for 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.

The Company's future minimum lease payments under noncancellable operating
leases for facilities as of December 31, 1995, are as follows:

30
34

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Minimum
Years ending December 31, Payments
--------
<S> <C>
1996 $442,037
1997 362,184
1998 51,441
1999 17,638
--------
$873,300
========
</TABLE>

Supply Agreements: The Company has entered into agreements with Biosource. APS
is required to make annual minimum purchases of melanin and pay royalties on
sales of APS melanin-Microsponge products (Note 3). The minimum financial
commitments not yet expensed by APS under the current agreements are $600,000
per annum for each of the years in the two year period ending December 31, 1998,
in aggregate $1,200,000.

NOTE 9 SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Private Placements and Common Stock Warrants: In 1994, the Company raised
$9,116,616 net of offering costs through two private placements. In the first
private placement, APS issued 1,000,000 shares of newly issued common stock to
Johnson & Johnson Development Corporation ("JJDC"), a subsidiary of Johnson &
Johnson, Inc. in consideration for $5,000,000. In addition, JJDC received
200,000 warrants exercisable for two years at $12.00 per share. APS will be
issuing JJDC an additional 432,101 shares in 1996 as a result of the APS stock
price not achieving certain predetermined levels.

The second private placement was pursuant to an agreement for the sale of up to
$8,000,000 of common stock and warrants in six installments beginning in June
1994 and ending on September 29, 1995. The Company sold $6,000,000 of common
stock and warrants through March 30, 1995. The remaining two optional
installments in June and September 1995 totalling $2,000,000 of common stock and
warrants were not sold by the Company. In accordance with the agreement, the
following shares of common stock and warrants were issued:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Number of Shares Number of Exercise Price
Date Issued of Common Stock Issued Warrants Issued of Warrants
----------- ---------------------- --------------- -----------

<S> <C> <C> <C>
June 30, 1994 294,314 294,314 $5.61
September 30, 1994 299,066 299,066 $5.52
December 31, 1994 331,778 331,778 $4.97
March 30, 1995 310,278 310,278 $5.32
</TABLE>

The warrants issued are exercisable over a three-year period. The value of the
warrants was determined using the Black-Scholes model.

In conjunction with certain debt financing agreements made in 1995 (Note 7), APS
issued a total of 193,175 warrants with an exercise price of $7.00 per share of
common stock. These warrants expire on March 27, 2000.

In the first quarter of 1995, 1,161,500 warrants which were issued in a 1992
private placement expired.

Stock Options: The Company has various stock option plans for employees,
officers, directors and consultants. The options are granted at fair market
value and expire no later than ten years from the date of the grant. The options
are exercisable in accordance with vesting schedules that generally provide for
them to be fully exercisable four years after the date of grant.




31
35







The following table summarizes option activity for 1995, 1994 and 1993:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Option shares,

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31, 1995 1994 1993
- ------------ ---------- ---------- ----------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
Outstanding at beginning of year 2,677,162 2,688,940 2,330,829
Granted 486,500 623,500 715,000
Exercised (236,992) (471,306) (211,639)
Expired or cancelled (104,346) (163,972) (145,250)
---------- ---------- ----------
Outstanding at end of year 2,822,324 2,677,162 2,688,940
---------- ---------- ----------
Option shares exercisable, December 31 1,877,295 1,529,574 1,607,539
---------- ---------- ----------
Shares available for future grant, December 31 317,819 707,973 1,279,750
---------- ---------- ----------
Option price per share:
Granted $ 5.000 - $ 6.500 $ 4.250 - $ 6.125 $ 5.250 - $ 8.125
Exercised $ 3.000 - $ 5.438 $ 3.750 - $ 6.500 $ 0.250 - $ 4.350
Outstanding, December 31 $ 3.000 - $11.125 $ 3.000 - $11.125 $ 3.000 - $11.125
</TABLE>

Distributions: Distributions presented in the Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders' Equity represent payments to the shareholders of Premier, which
was a subchapter S Corporation. Premier's S Corporation election was terminated
in conjunction with the merger (Note 13).

NOTE 10 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN

The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan covering substantially all of
its employees. In 1995, the Company made matching contributions equal to 50% of
each participant's contribution during the plan year up to a maximum amount
equal to the lesser of 3% of each participant's annual compensation or $4,620
for the calendar year. In the prior years, the maximum matching contribution
made by the Company was equal to the lesser of 1.5% of each participant's salary
or $1,000 per calendar year. The Company may also contribute additional
discretionary amounts as it may determine. For the years ended December 31,
1995, 1994 and 1993, the Company contributed to the plan approximately $89,000,
$55,000 and $40,000, respectively. No discretionary contributions have been made
to the plan since its inception.

NOTE 11 INCOME TAXES

A reconciliation of the Federal statutory rate of 34% to the Company's effective
tax rate is as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
December 31
1995 1994 1993
------ ------ ------
<S> <C> <C> <C>
U.S. Federal statutory rate (benefit) (34.0)% (34.0)% (34.0)%
Losses without tax benefits 33.5 34.0 34.0
State income taxes, net of U.S.
Federal income tax effect -- -- --
Nondeductible expenses 0.5 -- --
------ ------ ------
Total tax expense -- -- --
====== ====== ======
</TABLE>


At December 31, 1995, the Company had net Federal operating loss carry forwards
of approximately $63,000,000 for income tax reporting purposes and California
state operating loss carry forwards of approximately $8,800,000. The Federal net
operating loss carry forwards expire beginning in 1998 through the year 2010.
The California net operating loss carry forwards expire beginning in 1996
through the year 2000. A California net operating loss carry forward from 1988
in the approximate amount of $2,200,000 expired December 31, 1995.

Due to the "change in ownership" provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986,
approximately $32,000,000 and $5,500,000 of the Company's Federal and California
net operating loss carry forwards, respectively, are subject to an annual
limitation against taxable income. The balance of the Federal and California
loss carry forwards of approximately $31,000,000 and $3,300,000, respectively,
which arose subsequent to the Company's change in ownership will be fully
available to offset taxable income in excess of the annual limitation until
fully utilized or there is another ownership change.



32
36





The Company also has investment tax credit/carryovers and research and
experimental tax credits aggregating approximately $1,692,000 and $572,000 for
Federal and California purposes, respectively, of which approximately $663,000
and $139,000, respectively, are also subject to an annual limitation due to the
"change in ownership" provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986. The Federal
credits expire beginning in 1998 through the year 2010. The California credits
carry over indefinitely until utilized.

There are also California credit carry forwards for qualified manufacturing and
research and development equipment of approximately $10,000; these credits
expire in 2005.

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions
of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 1995 and
1994 are presented below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
1995 1994
---- ----
<S> <C> <C>
Deferred tax assets:
Deferred research expenditures $ 1,443,000 $ 765,000
Accruals and reserves not currently deductible
for tax purposes 1,197,000 953,000
Net operating loss carry forward 22,283,000 19,061,000
Credit carry forwards 2,274,000 2,051,000
Other 572,000 175,000
------------ ------------
Gross deferred tax assets 27,769,000 23,005,000
Less valuation allowance (27,426,000) (22,892,000)
------------ ------------
Total deferred tax assets $ 343,000 $ 113,000
------------ ------------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property and equipment $ (343,000) $ (113,000)
------------ ------------
Total deferred tax liabilities (343,000) (113,000)
------------ ------------
Net deferred taxes $ -- $ --
============ ============
</TABLE>

The net change in the valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 1995
and 1994 was an increase of approximately $4,534,000 and $3,627,000,
respectively. Management believes that sufficient uncertainty exists regarding
the realizability of these items and, accordingly, a valuation allowance is
required.

Gross deferred tax assets as of December 31, 1995 include approximately
$2,329,000 relating to the exercise of stock options, which will be
credited to equity when realized.

NOTE 12 ORTHO PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION

In May 1992, APS entered into development and licensing and investment
agreements with Ortho for the development of retinoid products. The first
product under development is a Microsponge system entrapment of tretinoin
(trans-retinoic acid or "t-RA"), a prescription acne drug. A second product
licensed to Ortho is a Microsponge entrapment of a retinoid to be used for the
treatment of photodamaged skin.

The terms of the agreements included an $8,000,000 investment in APS for 723,006
newly issued shares of APS common stock and the payment to APS of $6,000,000 in
licensing fees by J&J. The licensing fees were recognized as revenues according
to the percentage-of-completion method of accounting whereby income was
recognized based on the estimated stage of completion of the related project.
Cash payments received in advance of being earned were classified as deferred
revenue. Revisions of estimated profits have been included in earnings by the
reallocation method which spread the change in estimate over the current and
future periods. As of December 31, 1994, the project had been completed and all
associated revenues had been recognized.

J&J made a second equity investment in the Company in May 1994 through its
subsidiary Johnson & Johnson Development Corporation ("JJDC"). Under this
agreement, JJDC purchased 1,000,000 shares of newly issued common stock in
consideration for $5,000,000. In addition, JJDC received 200,000 warrants
exercisable for two years at $12.00 per share. APS will be issuing JJDC an
additional 432,101 shares in 1996 as a result of the APS stock price not
achieving certain predetermined levels. Upon issuance of these additional
shares, J&J's holding in APS common stock will increase to approximately 13% of
common shares outstanding.



33
37





In February 1995, APS received $750,000 in prepaid royalties and an additional
$750,000 as a milestone payment on the submission to the FDA of its New Drug
Application for the tretinoin prescription acne treatment. The milestone payment
was recognized as revenue upon receipt. The prepaid royalties of $750,000 were
recorded as deferred revenues. APS has the ability to earn an additional
$7,750,000 in fees if research milestones are achieved. If and when
approval is received from the FDA to market the Microsponge tretinoin products,
APS will earn a mark-up on Microsponge systems supplied to Ortho and J&J will
pay APS a royalty on product sales, subject to certain minimums. Should these
minimums not be achieved, Ortho loses its exclusivity and APS regains marketing
rights to the retinoid products.

NOTE 13 PREMIER, INC.

On April 2, 1993, APS acquired Premier, a marketing and distribution company
specializing in over-the-counter drug and personal care products. APS exchanged
454,444 shares of common stock for all the shares of Premier. The business
combination was accounted for as a pooling of interests, and accordingly, the
Company's historical consolidated financial statements presented herein are
restated to include the accounts and results of operations of Premier.

The results of operations previously reported by the separate enterprises and
the combined amounts presented in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements are summarized below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Year Ended December 31, 1993
- ----------------------- ----
<S> <C>
Total revenues:
Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. $ 12,002,807
Premier, Inc. 7,928,791
------------
Combined $ 19,931,598
------------
Net loss:
Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. $ (8,729,627)
Premier, Inc. (1,147,504)
------------
Combined $ (9,877,131)
------------
</TABLE>


NOTE 14 JOHNSON & JOHNSON

Licensing Agreement: The Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Premier, licensed
from J&J the exclusive right to manufacture and distribute a product, Take-Off,
in the U.S. The agreement provides for Premier to remit royalty payments to J&J
based on net sales, with minimum payments of $375,000 per year. This agreement
expires in 1996 and provides an option for Premier to extend the term.

Distribution Arrangement: Premier obtained the rights to market and distribute
two suncare products, Sundown and Johnson's Baby Sunblock, in the U.S. Premier
purchases all Sundown inventory from J&J at an agreed-upon price. Premier is
reimbursed by J&J for agreed-upon marketing expenses. Upon the termination of
the arrangement, Premier is required to sell to J&J all of the J&J product in
Premier's inventory at Premier's then current book value. Premier performs a
reconciliation of the payable to J&J annually to determine the portion that is
currently due. The portion of the payable that relates to inventory sold during
a contract year is due at the end of that contract year.



34
38





NOTE 15 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS AND MANAGEMENT'S PLANS WITH RESPECT TO FUNDING OF
OPERATIONS

In the first quarter of 1996, APS acquired all rights to the Polytrap
technology from Dow Corning in exchange for 200,000 shares of APS Common Stock.

The Company's existing cash and cash equivalents, collection of trade accounts
receivable, together with interest income and other revenue producing activities
including milestone payments, are expected to be sufficient to meet the
Company's near-term cash requirements assuming no changes to existing business
plans.

The Company is also currently developing a variety of opportunities which would
generate additional funds, including joint ventures, equity financings,
licensing agreements and other financing activities.

In the unlikely event that the Company is unable to raise additional funds
required to finance its operations, operating costs will have to be
significantly reduced by decreasing spending on advertising and promotion
activities, outside clinical programs and a variety of other discretionary
external expenditures.



35
39




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS
ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Advanced Polymer
Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995. In
connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also
have audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying
index. These consolidated financial statements and the financial statement
schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the
financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Advanced Polymer
Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1995, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as
a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein.

KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

San Francisco, California
March 15, 1996



36
40
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Within the twenty-four month period prior to December 31, 1995 and
through the date of this report, there has not been a change in accountants or a
reported disagreement with accountants on any matter of accounting principles or
practices or financial statement disclosure.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

APS incorporates by reference the information set forth under the
captions "Nomination and Election of Directors" and "Executive Compensation" of
the Company's Proxy Statement (the "Proxy Statement") for the annual meeting of
shareholders to be held on June 5, 1996.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

APS incorporates by reference the information set forth under the caption
"Executive Compensation" of the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The Company incorporates by reference the information set forth under the
caption "Beneficial Stock Ownership" of the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The Company incorporates by reference the information set forth under the
caption "Certain Transactions" of the Proxy Statement.

37
41



PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) 1. Financial Statements

The financial statements and supplementary data set forth on
pages 19-33 of Part II of the 10-K Annual Report are
incorporated herein by reference.

2. Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule II Valuation Accounts

All other schedules have been omitted because the information is not
required or is not so material as to require submission of the schedule, or
because the information is included in the financial statements or the notes
thereto.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
3. Exhibits

<S> <C>
3-A -Copy of Registrant's Certificate of Incorporation. (1)
3-B -Copy of Registrant's Bylaws. (1)
10-B -Lease Agreement between the Registrant and White Properties Joint Venture
for lease of Registrant's executive offices in Redwood City, dated as of August 1, 1992. (3)
10-C -Registrant's 1992 Stock Plan dated August 11, 1992. (2)*
10-N -Agreement with Johnson & Johnson dated April 14, 1992. (3)
10-O -Unit Purchase Agreement dated June 6, 1994. (5)
10-P -Warrant to Purchase Common Stock. (5)
10-Q -Investment Agreement with Johnson & Johnson Development Corporation dated May 13, 1994. (5)
10-R -Form of Warrant to purchase Common Stock issued to Johnson & Johnson
Development Corporation (5)
10-S -Lease Agreement between Registrant and Financing for Science International dated September 1, 1995
(6)
10-T -Security and Loan Agreement between Registrant and Venture Lending dated September 27, 1995 (6)
10-U -Asset Purchase Agreement with Dow Corning Corporation dated January 23, 1996.
21 -Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. (4)
23 -Consent of Independent Auditors.
27 -Financial Data Schedules
</TABLE>

(b) Reports on Form 8-K
None.

(c) Exhibits
The Company hereby files as part of this Form 10-K the exhibits
listed in Item 14(a)3. As set forth above.

(d) Financial Statement Schedules
See Item 14(a)2. of this Form 10-K.

- -----------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 33-15429) and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed as Exhibit No. 28.1 to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-50640), and
incorporated herein by reference.

(3) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1992, and incorporated herein by reference.

(4) To be filed supplementally.


(5) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, 4.3
and 4.4 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration No. 33-82562) and incorporated herein by
reference.

(6) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 1995.

* Management Contract or Compensatory plans.

38
42



For purposes of complying with the amendments to the rules governing
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (effective July 13, 1990) under the
Securities Act of 1933 ("the Act"), as amended, the undersigned registrant
hereby undertakes as follows, which undertaking shall be incorporated by
reference into Part II of the registrant's Registration Statements on Form S-8
Nos. 33-18942, 33-21829, 33-29084 and 33-50640 filed on December 8, 1987, May
13, 1988, June 6, 1989 and August 11, 1992, respectively.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the
registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission
such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is,
therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against
such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred
or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the
successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being
registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter
has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of
such issue.

39
43
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirement of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.

By: /s/ John J. Meakem, Jr.
-----------------------------
John J. Meakem, Jr.

Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed by the following person in the capacitites and on the dates
indicated.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Signature Title Date
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C>
/s/ John J. Meakem, Jr. Chairman, President,
- ----------------------------
John J. Meakem, Jr. Chief Executive Officer March 27, 1996

/s/ Michael O'Connell Senior Vice President, Chief
- ----------------------------
Michael O'Connell Administrative Officer and
Chief Financial Officer March 27, 1996

/s/ Carl Ehmann Director March 27, 1996
- ----------------------------
Carl Ehmann

/s/ Jorge Heller Director March 27, 1996
- ----------------------------
Jorge Heller

/s/ Helen C. Leong Director March 27, 1996
- ----------------------------
Helen C. Leong

/s/ Peter Riepenhausen Director March 27, 1996
- ----------------------------
Peter Riepenhausen

/s/ Toby Rosenblatt Director March 27, 1996
- ----------------------------
Toby Rosenblatt

/s/ Gregory H. Turnbull Director March 27, 1996
- ----------------------------
Gregory H. Turnbull

/s/ Dennis Winger Director March 27, 1996
- ----------------------------
Dennis Winger
</TABLE>

40
44
ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.

SCHEDULE II

VALUATION ACCOUNTS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Additions
Beginning Charged to Ending
Balance Expense Deductions Balance
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S> <C> <C> <C> <C>
December 31, 1993
Accounts receivable, allowance
for doubtful accounts $29,132 $108,240 $1,352 $136,020


December 31, 1994
Accounts receivable, allowance
for doubtful accounts $136,020 $5,833 $75,289 $66,564


December 31, 1995
Accounts receivable, allowance
for doubtful accounts $66,564 $29,464 $27,378 $68,650

</TABLE>

41
45


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS
ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos.
33-18942, 33-21829, 33-29084 and 33-50640) on Forms S-8 of Advanced Polymer
Systems, Inc. and in the Registration Statements (Nos. 33-47399, 33-51326 and
33-82562, 33-88972 and 333-759) on Forms S-3 of Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc.
of our report dated March 15, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and
1994, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended
December 31, 1995, and the related schedule, which report appears in the
December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 10-K of Advanced Polymer Systems, Inc.

KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

San Francisco, California
March 27, 1996

42
46


EXHIBIT INDEX

FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

ADVANCED POLYMER SYSTEMS, INC.

<TABLE>
<S> <C>
3-A -Copy of Registrant's Certificate of Incorporation. (1)
3-B -Copy of Registrant's Bylaws. (1)
10-B -Lease Agreement between the Registrant and White Properties Joint Venture
for lease of Registrant's executive offices in Redwood City, dated as of August 1, 1992. (3)
10-C -Registrant's 1992 Stock Plan dated August 11, 1992. (2)*
10-N -Agreement with Johnson & Johnson dated April 14, 1992. (3)
10-O -Unit Purchase Agreement dated June 6, 1994. (5)
10-P -Warrant to Purchase Common Stock. (5)
10-Q -Investment Agreement with Johnson & Johnson Development Corporation dated May 13, 1994. (5)
10-R -Form of Warrant to purchase Common Stock issued to Johnson & Johnson
Development Corporation (5)
10-S -Lease Agreement between Registrant and Financing for Science International dated September 1, 1995
(6)
10-T -Security and Loan Agreement between Registrant and Venture Lending dated September 27, 1995 (6)
10-U -Asset Purchase Agreement with Dow Corning Corporation dated January 23, 1996.
21 -Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. (4)
23 -Consent of Independent Auditors.
27 -Financial Data Schedules
</TABLE>

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration
No. 33-15429) and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed as Exhibit No. 28.1 to Registrant's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-50640), and
incorporated herein by reference.

(3) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1992, and incorporated herein by reference.

(4) To be filed supplementally.

(5) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, 4.3
and 4.4 to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3
(Registration No. 33-82562) and incorporated herein by
reference.

(6) Filed as an Exhibit with corresponding Exhibit No. to
Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 1995.

* Management Contract or Compensatory plans.

43