Use these links to rapidly review the document TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
Commission file number 1-13045
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
745 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA 02111(Address of Principal Executive Offices, Including Zip Code)
(617) 535-4766(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a small reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Number of shares of the registrant's Common Stock at July 26, 2010: 201,511,311
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
Index
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1—Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2009 (Unaudited) and June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 (Unaudited)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Item 2—Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 4—Controls and Procedures
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1—Legal Proceedings
Item 2—Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 6—Exhibits
Signatures
2
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, except Share and Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Accounts receivable (less allowances of $25,529 and $25,553, respectively)
Deferred income taxes
Prepaid expenses and other
Total Current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Property, plant and equipment
Less—Accumulated depreciation
Net Property, Plant and Equipment
Other Assets, net:
Goodwill
Customer relationships and acquisition costs
Deferred financing costs
Other
Total Other Assets, net
Total Assets
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses
Deferred revenue
Total Current Liabilities
Long-term Debt, net of current portion
Other Long-term Liabilities
Deferred Rent
Deferred Income Taxes
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 8)
Equity:
Iron Mountain Incorporated Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock (par value $0.01; authorized 10,000,000 shares; none issued and outstanding)
Common stock (par value $0.01; authorized 400,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 203,546,757 shares and 201,975,650 shares, respectively)
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive items, net
Total Iron Mountain Incorporated Stockholders' Equity
Noncontrolling Interests
Total Equity
Total Liabilities and Equity
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands, except Per Share Data)
Revenues:
Storage
Service
Total Revenues
Operating Expenses:
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization)
Selling, general and administrative
Depreciation and amortization
Loss (Gain) on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net
Total Operating Expenses
Operating Income (Loss)
Interest Expense (Income), Net (includes Interest Income of $578 and $378, respectively)
Other (Income) Expense, Net
Income (Loss) Before Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
Net Income (Loss)
Less: Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated
Earnings per Share—Basic and Diluted:
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated per Share—Basic
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated per Share—Diluted
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding—Basic
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding—Diluted
4
(Gain) Loss on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net
Interest Expense (Income), Net (includes Interest Income of $1,367 and $800, respectively)
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In Thousands, except Share Data)
Balance, December 31, 2008, as adjusted (see Note 2.a.)
Issuance of shares under employee stock purchase plan and option plans and stock-based compensation, including tax benefit of $2,483
Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Currency translation adjustment
Net income (loss)
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Noncontrolling interests equity contributions
Noncontrolling interests dividends
Balance, June 30, 2009
Balance, December 31, 2009, as adjusted (see Note 2.a.)
Issuance of shares under employee stock purchase plan and option plans and stock-based compensation, including tax benefit of $1,284
Stock options issued in connection with acquisition
Stock repurchases
Parent cash dividends declared (See Note 1)
Balance, June 30, 2010
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In Thousands)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated
7
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation
Amortization (includes deferred financing costs and bond discount of $2,517 and $2,647, respectively)
Stock-based compensation expense
Provision for deferred income taxes
Foreign currency transactions and other, net
Changes in Assets and Liabilities (exclusive of acquisitions):
Accounts receivable
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Accrued expenses, deferred revenue and other current liabilities
Other assets and long-term liabilities
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Additions to customer relationship and acquisition costs
Investment in restricted cash
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment and other, net
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Repayment of revolving credit and term loan facilities and other debt
Proceeds from revolving credit and term loan facilities and other debt
Debt financing (repayment to) and equity contribution from (distribution to) noncontrolling interests, net
Parent cash dividends
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
Payment of debt financing costs
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash and Cash Equivalents
Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
Supplemental Information:
Cash Paid for Interest
Cash Paid for Income Taxes
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Capital Leases
Accrued Capital Expenditures
Dividends Payable
Unsettled Purchases of Parent Common Stock
8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)
(1) General
The interim consolidated financial statements are presented herein without audit and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair presentation. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") have been omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, but we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The consolidated financial statements and notes included herein should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 26, 2010.
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
a. Principles of Consolidation and Change in Accounting Principle
The accompanying financial statements reflect our financial position and results of operations on a consolidated basis. Prior to January 1, 2010, the financial position and results of operations of the operating subsidiaries of Iron Mountain Europe (Group) Limited (collectively referred to as "IME"), our European business, were consolidated based on IME's fiscal year ended October 31. Effective January 1, 2010, we changed the fiscal year-end (and the reporting period for consolidation purposes) of IME to coincide with Iron Mountain Incorporated's ("IMI") fiscal year-end of December 31. We believe that the change in accounting principle related to the elimination of the two-month reporting lag for IME is preferable because it will result in more contemporaneous reporting of events and results related to IME. In accordance with applicable accounting literature, a change in subsidiary year-end is treated as a change in accounting principle and requires retrospective application. The cumulative effect of the change was an increase in retained earnings of $12,225 as of January 1, 2008. We also recorded a corresponding decrease in other long-term liabilities for the same amount. The impact of the change was not material to the results of operations for the previously reported annual and interim periods after January 1, 2008, and, thus, those results have not been revised. There is, however, a charge of $4,711 recorded to other (income) expense, net in the six months ended June 30, 2010 to recognize the immaterial differences arising in 2008 and 2009. Had the annual financial statements been revised, operating income, pretax income and net income attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated in calendar 2008 would have been decreased by $6,950, $11,700 and $9,039, respectively, and operating income, pretax income and net income attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated in calendar 2009 would have been increased by $3,714, $7,041 and $4,957 (of which $2,417, $4,750 and $4,391 would have been recognized in the three months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and $3,521, $9,742 and $8,174 would have been recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively), respectively. In addition, revenue, operating income, pretax income and net income attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 would not have changed materially had we not eliminated the 2-month reporting lag. There were no significant, infrequent or unusual items in the IME two-month period ended December 31, 2009. All intercompany account balances have been eliminated.
9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
b. Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and cash invested in short-term securities which have remaining maturities at the date of purchase of less than 90 days. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.
We have restricted cash associated with our worker's compensation self-insurance program, which represents a collateral trust agreement with our insurance carrier. The restricted cash subject to this agreement was $35,103 as of June 30, 2010 and is included in current assets on our consolidated balance sheets. Restricted cash consists primarily of U.S. treasuries.
c. Foreign Currency Translation and Foreign Currency Transaction Gains and Losses
Local currencies are considered the functional currencies for our operations outside the United States, with the exception of certain foreign holding companies and our financing center in Switzerland, whose functional currencies are the U.S. dollar. In those instances where the local currency is the functional currency, assets and liabilities are translated at period-end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses are translated at average exchange rates for the applicable period. Resulting translation adjustments are reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive items, net component of Iron Mountain Incorporated Stockholders' Equity and Noncontrolling Interests. The gain or loss on foreign currency transactions, calculated as the difference between the historical exchange rate and the exchange rate at the applicable measurement date, including those related to (a) our 71/4% GBP Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014, (b) our 63/4 Euro Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018, (c) the borrowings in certain foreign currencies under our revolving credit agreement, and (d) certain foreign currency denominated intercompany obligations of our foreign subsidiaries to us and between our foreign subsidiaries, are included in other expense (income), net, on our consolidated statements of operations. We recorded a net gain of $17,127 and $9,638 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and a net loss of $3,625 and $8,890 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, of foreign currency transactions gains and losses.
d. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but are reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. We currently have no intangible assets that have indefinite lives and which are not amortized, other than goodwill. Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives are amortized over their useful lives. We periodically assess whether events or circumstances warrant a change in the life over which our intangible assets are amortized.
We have selected October 1 as our annual goodwill impairment review date. We performed our annual goodwill impairment review as of October 1, 2009, and noted no impairment of goodwill. In making this assessment, we relied on a number of factors including operating results, business plans, anticipated future cash flows, transactions and market place data. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and our judgment in applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment. As of June 30, 2010, no factors were identified that would alter this assessment. When changes occur in
10
the composition of one or more reporting units, the goodwill is reassigned to the reporting units affected based on their relative fair values. Our reporting units at which level we performed our goodwill impairment analysis as of October 1, 2009 were as follows: North America (excluding Fulfillment), Fulfillment, Europe, Worldwide Digital Business (excluding Stratify, Inc. ("Stratify")), Stratify, Latin America and Asia Pacific. As of June 30, 2010, the carrying value of goodwill, net amounted to $1,718,139, $1,322, $413,660, $195,884, $130,010, $27,300 and $58,159 for North America (excluding Fulfillment), Fulfillment, Europe, Worldwide Digital Business (excluding Stratify), Stratify, Latin America and Asia Pacific, respectively.
Our North America (excluding Fulfillment), Fulfillment, Europe, Worldwide Digital Business (excluding Stratify), Stratify and Latin America reporting units have fair values as of October 1, 2009 that significantly exceed their carrying values. Our Asia Pacific reporting unit had a fair value that exceeds its carrying value by 9% as of October 1, 2009. Asia Pacific is still in the investment stage, and, accordingly, its fair value does not exceed its carrying value by a significant margin at this point in time. A deterioration of the Asia Pacific business or the business not achieving the forecasted results could lead to an impairment in future periods.
Reporting unit valuations have been calculated using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows of each reporting unit or a combined approach based on the present value of future cash flows and market and transaction multiples of revenues and earnings. The income approach incorporates many assumptions including future growth rates, discount factors, expected capital expenditures and income tax cash flows. Changes in economic and operating conditions impacting these assumptions could result in goodwill impairments in future periods. In conjunction with our annual goodwill impairment reviews, we reconcile the sum of the valuations of all of our reporting units to our market capitalization as of such dates.
The changes in the carrying value of goodwill attributable to each reportable operating segment for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:
Balance as of December 31, 2009
Non-deductible goodwill acquired during the year
Adjustments to purchase reserves
Fair value and other adjustments(1)
Currency effects
Balance as of June 30, 2010
11
The components of our amortizable intangible assets at June 30, 2010 are as follows:
Customer Relationships and Acquisition Costs
Core Technology(1)
Trademarks and Non-Compete Agreements(1)
Deferred Financing Costs
Total
e. Stock-Based Compensation
We record stock-based compensation expense, utilizing the straight-line method, for the cost of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and shares of stock issued under the employee stock purchase plan (together, "Employee Stock-Based Awards").
Stock-based compensation expense for Employee Stock-Based Awards included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was $4,877 ($3,781 after tax or $0.02 per basic and diluted share) and $9,136 ($7,246 after tax or $0.04 per basic and diluted share), respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $6,082 ($4,721 after tax or $0.02 per basic and diluted share) and $10,809 ($8,421 after tax or $0.04 per basic and diluted share), respectively.
The benefits associated with the tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost are reported as a financing cash flow. This requirement reduces reported operating cash flows and increases reported financing cash flows. As a result, net financing cash flows included $2,483 and $1,284 for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively, from the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost. We used the short form method to calculate the Additional Paid-in Capital ("APIC") pool. The tax benefit of any resulting excess tax deduction increases the APIC pool. Any resulting tax deficiency is deducted from the APIC pool.
Stock Options
Under our various stock option plans, options were granted with exercise prices equal to the market price of the stock on the date of grant. The majority of our options become exercisable ratably over a period of five years and generally have a contractual life of ten years, unless the holder's employment is terminated. Beginning in 2007, certain of the options we issue become exercisable ratably over a period of ten years and have a contractual life of 12 years, unless the holder's employment is terminated. As of June 30, 2010, ten-year vesting options represent 7.3% of total outstanding options. Our directors are considered employees for purposes of our stock option plans
12
and stock option reporting. Options granted to our non-employee directors generally become exercisable after one year.
The weighted average fair value of options granted for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 was $9.67 and $8.22 per share, respectively. The values were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following table summarizes the weighted average assumptions used for grants in the respective period:
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Expected dividend yield
Expected life of the option
Expected volatility was calculated utilizing daily historical volatility over a period that equates to the expected life of the option. The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury interest rates whose term is consistent with the expected life of the stock options. Beginning in the first quarter of 2010, expected dividend yield was considered in the option pricing model as a result of our new dividend program. The expected life (estimated period of time outstanding) of the stock options granted was estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees.
A summary of option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
Granted
Issued in Connection with Acquisitions
Exercised
Forfeited
Expired
Outstanding at June 30, 2010
Options exercisable at June 30, 2010
13
The following table provides the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010:
Aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
Under our various stock option plans, we may also issue grants of restricted stock or restricted stock units ("RSUs"). We issued restricted stock in December 2007 and June 2009, which had a 5-year vesting period. We issued RSUs in June 2010, which had a 4-year vesting period. The fair value of restricted stock and RSUs is the excess of the market price of our common stock at the date of grant over the exercise price (which is typically zero).
A summary of restricted stock and RSUs activity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 is as follows:
Non-vested at December 31, 2009
Vested
Non-vested at June 30, 2010
No restricted stock or RSUs vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The total fair value of restricted stock vested for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was $13. No RSUs vested during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
We offer an employee stock purchase plan in which participation is available to substantially all U.S. and Canadian employees who meet certain service eligibility requirements (the "ESPP"). The ESPP provides a way for our eligible employees to become stockholders on favorable terms. The ESPP provides for the purchase of our common stock by eligible employees through successive offering periods. We generally have two six-month offering periods per year, the first of which begins June 1 and ends November 30 and the second of which begins December 1 and ends May 31. During each offering period, participating employees accumulate after-tax payroll contributions, up to a maximum of 15% of their compensation, to pay the exercise price of their options. Participating employees may withdraw from an offering period before the purchase date and obtain a refund of the amounts
14
withheld as payroll deductions. At the end of the offering period, outstanding options are exercised, and each employee's accumulated contributions are used to purchase our common stock. The price for shares purchased under the ESPP is 95% of the fair market price at the end of the offering period, without a look-back feature. As a result, we do not recognize compensation cost for our ESPP shares purchased. The ESPP was amended and approved by our stockholders on May 26, 2005 and the number of shares available for purchase under the ESPP was increased to 3,487,500. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, there were 136,966 shares and 137,200 shares, respectively, purchased under the ESPP. The number of shares available for purchase under the ESPP at June 30, 2010 was 674,501.
As of June 30, 2010, unrecognized compensation cost related to the unvested portion of our Employee Stock-Based Awards was $60,867 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.9 years.
We generally issue shares for the exercises of stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, and shares under our ESPP from unissued reserved shares.
f. Income (Loss) Per Share—Basic and Diluted
Basic net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share is consistent with that of basic net income (loss) per share but gives effect to all potential common shares (that is, securities such as options, warrants or convertible securities) that were outstanding during the period, unless the effect is antidilutive.
15
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated:
Net income (loss) attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated
Weighted-average shares—basic
Effect of dilutive potential stock options
Effect of dilutive potential restricted stock and RSUs
Weighted-average shares—diluted
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated—basic
Net income (loss) per share attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated—diluted
Antidilutive stock options, excluded from the calculation
g. Revenues
Our revenues consist of storage revenues as well as service revenues and are reflected net of sales and value added taxes. Storage revenues, both physical and digital, which are considered a key performance indicator for the information management services industry, consist of largely recurring periodic charges related to the storage of materials or data (generally on a per unit basis). Service revenues are comprised of charges for related core service activities and a wide array of complementary products and services. Included in core service revenues are: (1) the handling of records, including the addition of new records, temporary removal of records from storage, refiling of removed records, destruction of records, and permanent withdrawals from storage; (2) courier operations, consisting primarily of the pickup and delivery of records upon customer request; (3) secure shredding of sensitive documents; and (4) other recurring services including maintenance and support contracts. Our complementary services revenues include special project work, data restoration projects, fulfillment services, consulting services and product sales (including software licenses, specially designed storage containers and related supplies). Our secure shredding revenues include the sale of recycled paper (included in complementary services), the price of which can fluctuate from period to period, adding to the volatility and reducing the predictability of that revenue stream.
16
We recognize revenue when the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Storage and service revenues are recognized in the month the respective storage or service is provided and customers are generally billed on a monthly basis on contractually agreed-upon terms. Amounts related to future storage or prepaid service contracts, including maintenance and support contracts, for customers where storage fees or services are billed in advance are accounted for as deferred revenue and recognized ratably over the applicable storage or service period or when the service is performed. Revenue from the sales of products is recognized when shipped to the customer and title has passed to the customer. Sales of software licenses are recognized at the time of product delivery to our customer or reseller and maintenance and support agreements are recognized ratably over the term of the agreement. Software license sales and maintenance and support accounted for less than 1% of our annual 2009 and the first six months of 2010 consolidated revenues. Within our Worldwide Digital Business segment, in certain instances, we process and host data for customers. In these instances, the processing fees are deferred and recognized over the estimated service period.
h. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Credit Memo Reserves
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts and credit memos for estimated losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to make required payments and disputes regarding billing and service issues. When calculating the allowance, we consider our past loss experience, current and prior trends in our aged receivables and credit memo activity, current economic conditions, and specific circumstances of individual receivable balances. If the financial condition of our customers were to significantly change, resulting in a significant improvement or impairment of their ability to make payments, an adjustment of the allowance may be required. We consider accounts receivable to be delinquent after such time as reasonable means of collection have been exhausted. We charge-off uncollectible balances as circumstances warrant, generally, no later than one year past due.
i. Income Taxes
Our effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 were 13.6% and 28.4%, respectively. Our effective tax rates for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 were 53.7% and 57.1%, respectively. The primary reconciling items between the statutory rate of 35% and our overall effective tax rate are state income taxes (net of federal benefit) and differences in the rates of tax at which our foreign earnings are subject, including foreign exchange gains and losses in different jurisdictions with different tax rates. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, foreign currency gains were recorded in lower tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of intercompany loan positions while foreign currency losses were recorded in higher tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of debt and derivative instruments, which reduced the 2009 tax rate by 25.8% and 11.6% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, foreign currency gains were recorded in higher tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of debt and derivative instruments while foreign currency losses were recorded in lower tax jurisdictions associated with our marketing-to-market of
17
intercompany loan positions, which increased the 2010 tax rate by 13.1% and 16.0%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. We provide for income taxes during interim periods based on our estimate of the effective tax rate for the year. Discrete items and changes in our estimate of the annual effective tax rate are recorded in the period they occur.
Accounting for income taxes requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities and for loss and credit carryforwards. Valuation allowances are provided when recovery of deferred tax assets is not considered more likely than not. There were no material changes related to uncertain tax position during the six months ended June 30, 2010.
We have elected to recognize interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as a component of the provision (benefit) for income taxes in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. We recorded $486 and $1,736 for gross interest and penalties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. We recorded $1,578 and $2,750 for gross interest and penalties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. We had $12,874 and $15,624 accrued for the payment of interest and penalties as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively.
j. Fair Value Measurements
Entities are permitted under GAAP to elect to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at either fair value or cost. We did not elect the fair value measurement option for any of our financial assets or liabilities.
Our financial assets or liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability's classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:
Level 1—Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2—Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3—Unobservable inputs that reflect our assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.
18
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010:
Money Market Funds(1)
Time Deposits(1)
Trading Securities
Derivative Assets(3)
Disclosures are required in the financial statements for items measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. We did not have any material items that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
k. New Accounting Pronouncements
Effective at the start of a reporting entity's first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009, or January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") Accounting Standards Codification™ (the "Codification") will require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and transactions where entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. The Codification eliminates the concept of a "qualifying special-purpose entity", changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures about an entity's involvement with variable interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects such reporting entity's financial statements. The adoption of these Codification updates did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and results of operations.
In October 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance on multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements and software revenue recognition. The multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements updates to the Codification apply to all deliverables in contractual arrangements in all industries in
19
which a vendor will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. The change to the Codification creates a selling price hierarchy that an entity must use as evidence of fair value in separately accounting for all deliverables on a relative-selling-price basis which qualify for separation. The selling price hierarchy includes: (1) vendor-specific objective evidence; (2) third-party evidence and (3) estimated selling price. Broadly speaking, this update to the Codification will result in the possibility for some entities to recognize revenue earlier and more closely align with the economics of certain revenue arrangements if the other criteria for separation (e.g. standalone value to the customer) are met. The software revenue recognition guidance was issued to address factors that entities should consider when determining whether the software and non-software components of a product function together to deliver the product's essential functionality. The software revenue recognition updates to the Codification will allow revenue arrangements in which software and non-software components deliver together a product's essential functionality to follow the multiple-deliverable revenue recognition criteria as opposed to the criteria applicable to software revenue recognition. Both updates are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and apply prospectively to new or materially modified revenue arrangements after its effective date. Early adoption is permitted; however, we do not anticipate early adopting. We are currently evaluating the impact of these Codification updates to our consolidated financial statements and results of operations.
In January 2010, the FASB issued amended guidance improving disclosures about fair value measurements to add new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. The new guidance also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The change in the Codification requires an entity, in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities, to consider the nature and risks of the assets and liabilities as well as their placement in the fair value hierarchy (Level 1, 2 or 3). The Codification update is effective for the first reporting period, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements on a gross basis, which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. In the period of initial adoption, entities will not be required to provide the amended disclosures for any previous periods presented for comparative purposes. However, those disclosures are required for periods ending after initial adoption. Early adoption is permitted for the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis; however, we do not anticipate early adopting. We do not expect adoption to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and results of operations.
l. Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended. On an on-going basis, we evaluate the estimates used. We base our estimates on historical experience, actuarial estimates, current conditions and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis
20
for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
m. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Items, Net
Accumulated other comprehensive items, net consists of foreign currency translation adjustments as of December, 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively.
n. Other Expense (Income), Net
Other expense (income), net consists of the following:
Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses, net
Other, net
(3) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
Every derivative instrument is required to be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at its fair value. Periodically, we acquire derivative instruments that are intended to hedge either cash flows or values which are subject to foreign exchange or other market price risk, and not for trading purposes. We have formally documented our hedging relationships, including identification of the hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as our risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking each hedge transaction. Given the recurring nature of our revenues and the long term nature of our asset base, we have the ability and the preference to use long-term, fixed interest rate debt to finance our business, thereby preserving our long term returns on invested capital. We target approximately 75% of our debt portfolio to be fixed with respect to interest rates. Occasionally, we will use interest rate swaps as a tool to maintain our targeted level of fixed rate debt. In addition, we will use borrowings in foreign currencies, either obtained in the U.S. or by our foreign subsidiaries, to naturally hedge foreign currency risk associated with our international investments. Sometimes we enter into currency swaps to temporarily hedge an overseas investment, such as a major acquisition, while we arrange permanent financing or to hedge our exposures due to foreign currency exchange movements related to our intercompany accounts with and between our foreign subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, none of our derivative instruments contained credit-risk related contingent features.
We have entered into a number of forward contracts to hedge our exposures in British pounds sterling. As of June 30, 2010, we had an outstanding forward contract to purchase 188,464 U.S. dollars and sell 125,000 British pounds sterling to hedge our intercompany exposures with IME. At the maturity of the forward contracts, we may enter into new forward contracts to hedge movements in the underlying currencies. At the time of settlement, we either pay or receive the net settlement amount
21
(3) Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (Continued)
from the forward contract and recognize this amount in other (income) expense, net in the accompanying statement of operations as a realized foreign exchange gain or loss. We have not designated these forward contracts as hedges. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, there was $17,414 and $2,392 in net cash disbursements, respectively, included in cash from operating activities related to settlements associated with these foreign currency forward contracts. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, there was $946 in net cash disbursements and $10,006 in net cash receipts, respectively, included in cash from operating activities related to settlements associated with these foreign currency forward contracts. The following table provides the fair value of our derivative instruments as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 and their gains and losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010:
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange contracts
In the third quarter of 2007, we designated a portion of our 63/4% Euro Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018 issued by IMI (the "63/4% Euro Notes") as a hedge of net investment of certain of our Euro denominated subsidiaries. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, we designated on average 113,500 and 76,000 Euros, respectively, of the 63/4% Euro Notes as a hedge of net investment of certain of our Euro denominated subsidiaries. As a result, we recorded foreign exchange losses of $7,729 ($4,830, net of tax) and foreign exchange gains of $4,272 ($2,491, net of tax) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, related to the change in fair value of such debt due to currency translation adjustments which is a component of accumulated other comprehensive items, net included in stockholders' equity. We recorded foreign exchange gains of $8,775 ($5,486, net of tax) and $15,636 ($9,774, net of tax) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, related to the change in fair value of such debt due to currency translation adjustments which is a component of accumulated other comprehensive items, net included in stockholders' equity. As of June 30, 2010, net gains of $13,133 are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive items, net associated with this net investment hedge.
22
(4) Acquisitions
We account for acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting, and, accordingly, the results of operations for each acquisition have been included in our consolidated results from their respective acquisition dates. Cash consideration for our various acquisitions was primarily provided through borrowings under our credit facilities and cash equivalents on-hand. The unaudited pro forma results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2010 are not presented due to the insignificant impact of the 2010 acquisitions on our consolidated results of operations.
In February 2010, we acquired 100% of Mimosa Systems, Inc. ("Mimosa"), a leader in enterprise-class digital content archiving solutions, for approximately $112,000 in cash and approximately $2,000 in fair value of options issued. Mimosa, based in Santa Clara, California, provides an on-premises integrated archive for email, SharePoint data and files, and complements IMI's existing enterprise-class, cloud-based digital archive services. NearPoint, Mimosa's enterprise archiving platform, has applications for retention and disposition, eDiscovery, compliance supervision, classification, recovery, and end-user search, enabling customers to reduce risk and lower their eDiscovery and storage costs. Goodwill associated with the Mimosa acquisition was allocated to the Worldwide Digital Business (excluding Stratify) reporting unit. We deposited $11,200 of the cash consideration payable in our acquisition of Mimosa into escrow to secure certain indemnification obligations of the former stockholders of Mimosa (the "Mimosa Stockholders") and to satisfy certain other obligations of the Mimosa Stockholders. On the 15-month anniversary of the closing of the acquisition, or May 16, 2011, amounts remaining in the escrow fund will be distributed to the Mimosa Stockholders, minus (i) $750 which shall continue to be held as security for certain types of claims and (ii) any amounts held for unresolved indemnification claims made by us. On the 24-month anniversary of the closing, or February 16, 2012, the balance of the escrow fund less any amounts held for unresolved claims will be distributed to the Mimosa Stockholders. The allocation of the purchase price will be finalized upon the final settlement of the purchase price with the Mimosa Stockholders and the subsequent completion of the analyses of the fair value of Mimosa's assets and liabilities and certain tax matters. The analyses include examination of the underlying books and tax records, completion of an appraisal of certain intangible assets and liabilities and a full assessment of legal and tax contingencies.
To expand our geographical footprint in Europe, in May 2010 we acquired the remaining 87% interest of our joint venture in Greece (Safe doc S.A.) for a cash purchase price of approximately $4,700 and now control 100% of our Greek operations, which provide storage and records management services. The carrying value of the 13% interest that we had previously acquired and accounted for under the equity method of accounting amounted to approximately $416 and the fair value of such interest on the date of acquisition was approximately $473 and resulted in a gain being recorded on the date of the transaction to other (income) expense, net included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations of approximately $57 during the second quarter of 2010.
23
(4) Acquisitions (Continued)
A summary of the consideration paid for acquisitions in 2010 and the allocation of the purchase price of the acquisitions is as follows:
Cash Paid (gross of cash acquired)(1)
Fair Value of Options Issued
Fair Value of Previously Held Equity Interest
Total Consideration
Fair Value of Identifiable Assets Acquired:
Cash, Accounts Receivable, Prepaid Expenses, Deferred Income Taxes and Other
Property, Plant and Equipment(2)
Customer Relationship Assets(3)
Core Technology(3)
Liabilities Assumed(4)
Total Fair Value of Identifiable Net Assets Acquired
Recorded Goodwill
Allocations of the purchase price for the 2010 acquisitions were based on estimates of the fair value of net assets acquired and are subject to adjustment. The purchase price allocations of the 2010 acquisitions are subject to finalization of the assessment of the fair value of intangible assets (primarily customer relationship assets and core technology), racking, deferred revenue, sales and use tax and deferred income taxes (including taxes payable, tax reserves and valuation allowances). We are not aware of any information that would indicate that the final purchase price allocations will differ meaningfully from preliminary estimates. Our acquisitions after January 1, 2009 will be accounted for under newly promulgated accounting guidance and all acquisition costs and restructuring activity has been charged to operations rather than being capitalized as part of the purchase price.
24
(5) Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
Revolving Credit Facility(1)
Term Loan Facility(1)
71/4% GBP Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 (the "71/4% notes")(2)(3)
73/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 (the "73/4% notes")(2)(3)
65/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 (the "65/8% notes")(2)(3)
71/2% CAD Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017 (the "Subsidiary Notes")(2)(4)
83/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018 (the "83/4% notes")(2)(3)
8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018 (the "8% notes")(2)(3)
63/4% Euro Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018 (the "63/4% notes")(2)(3)
8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2020 (the "8% notes due 2020")(2)(3)
83/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021 (the "83/8% notes")(2)(3)
Real Estate Mortgages, Capital Leases and Other(5)
Total Long-term Debt
Less Current Portion
Long-term Debt, Net of Current Portion
25
(5) Long-term Debt (Continued)
obligations of the Guarantors. Iron Mountain Canada Corporation ("Canada Company") and the remainder of our subsidiaries do not guarantee the Parent Notes.
Our credit facility consists of (i) revolving credit facilities, where we can borrow, subject to certain limitations as defined in the credit agreement we entered into on April 16, 2007 governing this facility (the "Credit Agreement"), up to an aggregate amount of $765,000 (including Canadian dollar and multi-currency revolving credit facilities), and (ii) a $410,000 term loan facility. Our revolving credit facility is supported by a group of 24 banks. Our subsidiaries, Canada Company and Iron Mountain Switzerland GmbH, may borrow directly under the Canadian revolving credit and multi-currency revolving credit facilities, respectively. Additional subsidiary borrowers may be added under the multi-currency revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility terminates on April 16, 2012. With respect to the term loan facility, quarterly loan payments of approximately $1,000 are required through maturity on April 16, 2014, at which time the remaining outstanding principal balance of the term loan facility is due. The interest rate on borrowings under the Credit Agreement varies depending on our choice of interest rate and currency options, plus an applicable margin. IMI guarantees the obligations of each of the subsidiary borrowers under the Credit Agreement, and substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries guarantee the obligations of IMI and the subsidiary borrowers. The capital stock or other equity interests of most of our U.S. subsidiaries, and up to 66% of the capital stock or other equity interests of our first tier foreign subsidiaries, are pledged to secure the Credit Agreement, together with all intercompany obligations of foreign subsidiaries owed to us or to one of our U.S. subsidiary guarantors. As of June 30, 2010, we had $12,054 of outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility, of which $4,500 was denominated in U.S. dollars and the remaining balance was denominated in Euro (EUR 2,700) and Australian dollars (AUD 5,000); we also had various outstanding letters of credit totaling $2,550. The remaining availability, based on IMI's leverage ratio, which is calculated based on the last 12 months' earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), and other adjustments as defined in the Credit Agreement and current external debt, under the revolving credit facility on June 30, 2010, was $750,396. The interest rate in effect under the revolving credit facility and term loan facility was 3.2% and 2.1%, respectively, as of June 30, 2010. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we recorded commitment fees of $493 and $975, respectively, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded commitment fees of $585 and $1,152, respectively, based on the unused balances under our revolving credit facilities.
The Credit Agreement, our indentures and other agreements governing our indebtedness contain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants, including covenants that restrict our ability to complete acquisitions, pay cash dividends, incur indebtedness, make investments, sell assets and take certain other corporate actions. The covenants do not contain a rating trigger. Therefore, a change in our debt rating would not trigger a default under the Credit Agreement and our indentures and other agreements governing our indebtedness. Our revolving credit and term loan facilities, as well as our indentures, use EBITDA based calculations as primary measures of financial performance, including
26
leverage ratios. IMI's revolving credit and term leverage ratio was 3.3 and 3.1 as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to a maximum allowable ratio of 5.5. Similarly, our bond leverage ratio, per the indentures, was 4.1 and 3.8 as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to a maximum allowable ratio of 6.5. Noncompliance with these leverage ratios would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.
(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors
The following data summarizes the consolidating Company on the equity method of accounting as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010.
The Parent Notes and the Subsidiary Notes are guaranteed by the subsidiaries referred to below as the "Guarantors." These subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Parent. The guarantees are full and unconditional, as well as joint and several.
27
(6) Selected Consolidated Financial Statements of Parent, Guarantors, Canada Company and Non-Guarantors (Continued)
Additionally, the Parent guarantees the Subsidiary Notes, which were issued by Canada Company. Canada Company does not guarantee the Parent Notes. The other subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Parent Notes or the Subsidiary Notes are referred to below as the "Non-Guarantors."
Assets
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Accounts Receivable
Intercompany Receivable
Other Current Assets
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Other Assets, Net:
Long-term Notes Receivable from Affiliates and Intercompany Receivable
Investment in Subsidiaries
Total Other Assets, Net
Liabilities and Equity
Intercompany Payable
Current Portion of Long-term Debt
Total Other Current Liabilities
Long-term Notes Payable to Affiliates and Intercompany Payable
Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 8)
28
Restricted Cash
29
Cost of Sales (Excluding
Depreciation and Amortization)
Selling, General and Administrative
Depreciation and Amortization
(Gain) Loss on Disposal/Writedown of Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Operating (Loss) Income
Interest Expense (Income), Net
Other Expense (Income), Net
(Loss) Income Before Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
Equity in the (Earnings) Losses of Subsidiaries, Net of Tax
30
Cost of Sales (Excluding Depreciation and Amortization)
Less: Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
31
Loss (Gain) on Disposal/Writedown of Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
32
33
Intercompany loans to subsidiaries
Investment in subsidiaries
Intercompany loans from parent
Equity contribution from parent
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents
Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
34
35
(7) Segment Information
Corporate and our five operating segments are as follows:
The Latin America, Asia Pacific and Europe operating segments have been aggregated given their similar economic characteristics, products, customers and processes and reported as one reportable segment, "International Physical Business." The Worldwide Digital Business does not meet the quantitative criteria for a reportable segment; however, management determined that it would disclose such information on a voluntary basis.
36
(7) Segment Information (Continued)
An analysis of our business segment information and reconciliation to the consolidated financial statements is as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
Amortization
Adjusted OIBDA
Expenditures for Segment Assets
Capital Expenditures
Cash Paid for Acquisitions, Net of Cash acquired
Additions to Customer Relationship and Acquisition Costs
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Total Assets(1)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
37
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 2. Adjusted OIBDA, previously referred to as Contribution, for each segment is defined as operating income before depreciation and amortization expenses, excluding (gain) loss on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net which are directly attributable to the segment. Internally, we use Adjusted OIBDA as the basis for evaluating the performance of and allocating resources to our operating segments.
A reconciliation of Adjusted OIBDA to income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes on a consolidated basis is as follows:
Less: Depreciation and Amortization
Interest Expense (Income), net
Other (Income) Expense, net
Income (Loss) before Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
(8) Commitments and Contingencies
We are involved in litigation from time to time in the ordinary course of business with a portion of the defense and/or settlement costs being covered by various commercial liability insurance policies purchased by us. In the opinion of management, no material legal proceedings are pending to which we, or any of our properties, are subject, except as discussed below. We record legal costs associated with loss contingencies as expenses in the period in which they are incurred.
In May 2006, we filed an eviction lawsuit against a tenant, Digital Encoding Factory, LLC ("DEF"), leasing space in our Boyers, Pennsylvania records storage facility for its failure to make required rent payments. In October 2006, DEF and two related companies, EDA Acquisition, LLC, and Media Holdings, LLC, filed a lawsuit against us in the U.S. Federal District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania alleging that they started a digital scanning business in our Boyers, Pennsylvania, records storage facility because we verbally agreed to refer customer digital scanning business in the facility to them (the "Pittsburgh Lawsuit") and promised substantial business. The plaintiffs contended that we breached this alleged verbal agreement and sought to recover damages in the range of $6,500 to $53,500. We disputed the plaintiffs' claims and contended that there was no such verbal agreement. A bench trial occurred in the case in March 2010. In July 2010, we executed an
38
(8) Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)
agreement with the plaintiffs settling the case before the judge reached a decision in the matter. The legal proceedings related to this event did not have a material impact to our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In July 2006, we experienced a significant fire in a leased records and information management facility in London, England, that resulted in the complete destruction of the facility and its contents. The London Fire Brigade ("LFB") issued a report in which it was concluded that the fire resulted either from human agency, i.e., arson, or an unidentified ignition device or source, and its report to the Home Office concluded that the fire resulted from a deliberate act. The LFB also concluded that the installed sprinkler system failed to control the fire due to the primary electric fire pump being disabled prior to the fire and the standby diesel fire pump being disabled in the early stages of the fire by third-party contractors. We have received notices of claims from customers or their subrogated insurance carriers under various theories of liabilities arising out of lost data and/or records as a result of the fire. Certain of those claims have resulted in litigation in courts in the United Kingdom. We deny any liability in respect of the London fire and we have referred these claims to our excess warehouse legal liability insurer, which has been defending them to date under a reservation of rights. Certain of the claims have been settled for nominal amounts, typically one to two British pounds sterling per carton, as specified in the contracts, which amounts have been or will be reimbursed to us from our primary property insurer. An entity that provided certain security services related to the destroyed facility as a contractor to us is a defendant in an action by the owner of the property, seeking damages in the amount of approximately 10,700 British pounds sterling for negligence and breach of duty. The security service provider recently petitioned the court hearing the matter to join Iron Mountain (UK) as a third party defendant, seeking contribution in respect of its liability (if any) to the owner of the building, and the court has granted the motion. We believe there are meritorious defenses available to us with respect to the claim. Many claims, including substantial claims, remain outstanding; others have been resolved pursuant to consent orders. We believe we carry adequate property and liability insurance. We do not expect that legal proceedings related to this event will have a material impact to our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
As a result of the February 27, 2010 earthquake in Chile, we experienced damage to certain of our 13 owned and leased records management facilities in that region. None of our facilities were destroyed by fire or significantly impacted by water damage. However, the structural integrity of five buildings was compromised, and some of the racking included in certain buildings was damaged or destroyed. Some customer materials were impacted by this event. Revenues from this country represent less than 1% of our consolidated enterprise revenues. We believe we carry adequate property and liability insurance and do not expect that this event will have a material impact to our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we received payments from our insurance carrier of approximately $21,000. Such amount represents a portion of our business personal property, business
39
interruption, and expense claims filed with our insurance carriers. We expect to utilize cash from our insurance settlements to fund capital expenditures and for general working capital needs. Recoveries from the business interruption portion of our insurance claim will be recorded as other income in the consolidated statement of operations when received. We expect to receive proceeds from our property claims that exceed the carrying value of the related assets. We, therefore, expect to record gains on the disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net in our statement of operations in future periods when the cash received to date exceeds the carrying value of the related property, plant and equipment, net. Proceeds from our business personal property claims are reflected in our statement of cash flows under proceeds from sales of property and equipment and other, net included in the investing activities section when received. We have reflected approximately $6,400 of the cash proceeds received to date as proceeds from sales of property and equipment, net in our statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Proceeds from our business interruption claims are reflected in our statement of cash flows as a component of net income included in the operating activities section when received.
(9) Stockholders' Equity Matters
In February 2010, our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing up to $150,000 in repurchases of our common stock. This represented approximately 3% of our outstanding common stock based on the closing price on February 19, 2010. All purchases are subject to stock price, market conditions, corporate and legal requirements and other factors. In addition, in February 2010, our board of directors adopted a dividend policy under which we intend to pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock. The first quarterly dividend of $0.0625 per share was paid on April 15, 2010 to shareholders of record on March 25, 2010 in the aggregate amount of $12,720. The second quarterly dividend of $0.0625 per share was paid on July 15, 2010 to shareholders of record on June 25, 2010 in the aggregate amount of $12,641. Declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board of directors.
(10) Subsequent Events
In August 2010, we called $200,000 of the $431,255 aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 73/4% notes due 2015 at a redemption price of 101.292% for each one thousand dollars of principal amount of notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, all of which will be paid in September 2010. We will record a charge to other expense (income), net of approximately $1,800 in the third quarter of 2010 related to the early extinguishment of the 73/4% notes being redeemed. This charge consists of the call premium and deferred financing costs, net of original issue premiums related to the 73/4% notes.
We have evaluated subsequent events through the date our financial statements were issued.
40
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, included herein, and for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2010.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We have made statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that constitute "forward-looking statements" as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements concern our operations, economic performance, financial condition, goals, beliefs, future growth strategies, investment objectives, plans and current expectations, including our intent to repurchase shares and to pay dividends, our financial ability and sources to fund the repurchase program and dividend policy, and the amounts of such repurchases and dividends. The forward-looking statements are subject to various known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. When we use words such as "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "estimates" or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our expected results may not be achieved, and actual results may differ materially from our expectations. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations include, among others: (1) the cost to comply with current and future laws, regulations and customer demands relating to privacy issues; (2) the impact of litigation that may arise in connection with incidents in which we fail to protect our customer's information; (3) changes in the price for our services relative to the cost of providing such services; (4) changes in customer preferences and demand for our services; (5) in the various digital businesses in which we are engaged, the cost of capital and technical requirements, demand for our services or competition for customers; (6) the impact of legal restrictions or limitations under stock repurchase plans on price, volume or timing of stock repurchases; (7) the impact of alternative, more attractive investments on dividends or stock repurchases; (8) our ability or inability to complete acquisitions on satisfactory terms and to integrate acquired companies efficiently; (9) the cost or potential liabilities associated with real estate necessary for our business; (10) the performance of business partners upon whom we depend for technical assistance or management expertise outside the U.S.; (11) changes in the political and economic environments in the countries in which our international subsidiaries operate; (12) claims that our technology violates the intellectual property rights of a third party; and (13) other trends in competitive or economic conditions affecting our financial condition or results of operations not presently contemplated. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements except as statements of our present intentions and of our present expectations, which may or may not occur. Other risks may adversely impact us, as described more fully under "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K dated February 26, 2010. You should read these cautionary statements as being applicable to all forward-looking statements wherever they appear. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to release publicly the result of any revision to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Readers are also urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures we have made in this document, as well as our other periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").
41
Non-GAAP Measures
Adjusted Operating Income Before Depreciation and Amortization, or Adjusted OIBDA
Adjusted OIBDA is defined as operating income before depreciation and amortization expenses, excluding (gain) loss on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net. Adjusted OIBDA Margin is calculated by dividing Adjusted OIBDA by total revenues. We use multiples of current or projected Adjusted OIBDA in conjunction with our discounted cash flow models to determine our overall enterprise valuation and to evaluate acquisition targets. We believe Adjusted OIBDA and Adjusted OIBDA Margin provide current and potential investors with relevant and useful information regarding our ability to generate cash flow to support business investment. These measures are an integral part of the internal reporting system we use to assess and evaluate the operating performance of our business. Adjusted OIBDA does not include certain items that we believe are not indicative of our core operating results, specifically: (1) (gains) and losses on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net, (2) other (income) expense, net, (3) cumulative effect of change in accounting principle and (4) net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests.
Adjusted OIBDA also does not include interest expense, net and the provision (benefit) for income taxes. These expenses are associated with our capitalization and tax structures, which we do not consider when evaluating the operating profitability of our core operations. Finally, Adjusted OIBDA does not include depreciation and amortization expenses, in order to eliminate the impact of capital investments, which we evaluate by comparing capital expenditures to incremental revenue generated and as a percentage of total revenues. Adjusted OIBDA and Adjusted OIBDA Margin should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performance reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), such as operating or net income (loss) or cash flows from operating activities (as determined in accordance with GAAP).
Reconciliation of Adjusted OIBDA to Operating Income (Loss) and Net Income (Loss) (in thousands):
Loss (gain) on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net
Less: Interest Expense, Net
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling interests
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions
42
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended.
On an on-going basis, we evaluate the estimates used. We base our estimates on historical experience, actuarial estimates, current conditions and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our critical accounting policies include the following, which are listed in no particular order:
Further detail regarding our critical accounting policies can be found in "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the consolidated financial statements and the notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC on February 26, 2010. Management has determined that no material changes concerning our critical accounting policies have occurred since December 31, 2009.
Prior to January 1, 2010, the financial position and results of operations of the operating subsidiaries of Iron Mountain Europe (Group) Limited (collectively referred to as "IME"), our European business, were consolidated based on IME's fiscal year ended October 31. Effective January 1, 2010, we changed the fiscal year-end (and the reporting period for consolidation purposes) of IME to coincide with Iron Mountain Incorporated's ("IMI") fiscal year-end of December 31. We believe that the change in accounting principle related to the elimination of the two-month reporting lag for IME is preferable because it will result in more contemporaneous reporting of events and results related to IME. In accordance with applicable accounting literature, a change in subsidiary year-end is treated as a change in accounting principle and requires retrospective application. The cumulative effect of the change was an increase in retained earnings of $12.2 million as of January 1, 2008. We also recorded a corresponding decrease in other long-term liabilities for the same amount. The impact of the change was not material to the results of operations for the previously reported annual and interim periods after January 1, 2008, and, thus, those results have not been revised. There is, however, a charge of $4.7 million recorded to other (income) expense, net in the six months ended June 30, 2010 to recognize the immaterial differences arising in 2008 and 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective at the start of a reporting entity's first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2009, or January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") Accounting Standards Codification™ (the "Codification") will require more information about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and transactions where entities have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. The Codification eliminates the concept of a "qualifying special-purpose entity", changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosures about an entity's involvement with variable interest entities
43
and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity will be required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects such reporting entity's financial statements. The adoption of these Codification updates did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and results of operations.
In October 2009, the FASB issued amended guidance on multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements and software revenue recognition. The multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements updates to the Codification apply to all deliverables in contractual arrangements in all industries in which a vendor will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. The change to the Codification creates a selling price hierarchy that an entity must use as evidence of fair value in separately accounting for all deliverables on a relative-selling-price basis which qualify for separation. The selling price hierarchy includes: (1) vendor-specific objective evidence; (2) third-party evidence and (3) estimated selling price. Broadly speaking, this update to the Codification will result in the possibility for some entities to recognize revenue earlier and more closely align with the economics of certain revenue arrangements if the other criteria for separation (e.g. standalone value to the customer) are met. The software revenue recognition guidance was issued to address factors that entities should consider when determining whether the software and non-software components of a product function together to deliver the product's essential functionality. The software revenue recognition updates to the Codification will allow revenue arrangements in which software and non-software components deliver together a product's essential functionality to follow the multiple-deliverable revenue recognition criteria as opposed to the criteria applicable to software revenue recognition. Both updates are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and apply prospectively to new or materially modified revenue arrangements after its effective date. Early adoption is permitted; however, we do not anticipate early adopting. We are currently evaluating the impact of these Codification updates to our consolidated financial statements and results of operations.
Overview
The following discussions set forth, for the periods indicated, management's discussion and analysis of results. Significant trends and changes are discussed for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 within each section. Trends and changes that are consistent within the three and six months periods are not repeated and are discussed on a year-to-date basis.
Our revenues consist of storage revenues as well as service revenues. Storage revenues, both physical and digital, which are considered a key performance indicator for the information management services industry, consist of largely recurring periodic charges related to the storage of materials or data
44
(generally on a per unit basis), which are typically retained by customers for many years. Service revenues are comprised of charges for related core service activities and a wide array of complementary products and services. Included in core service revenues are: (1) the handling of records including the addition of new records, temporary removal of records from storage, refiling of removed records, destruction of records, and permanent withdrawals from storage; (2) courier operations, consisting primarily of the pickup and delivery of records upon customer request; (3) secure shredding of sensitive documents; and (4) other recurring services including maintenance and support contracts. Our complementary services revenues include special project work, data restoration projects, fulfillment services, consulting services and product sales (including software licenses, specially designed storage containers and related supplies). Our secure shredding business generates the sale of recycled paper (included in complementary services revenues), the price of which can fluctuate from period to period, adding to the volatility and reducing the predictability of that revenue stream.
Our consolidated revenues and expenses are subject to variations caused by the net effect of foreign currency translation on revenues and expenses incurred by our entities outside the U.S. In 2009, we saw decreases in both revenues and expenses as a result of the weakening of the British pound sterling, Canadian dollar and Euro against the U.S. dollar, based on an analysis of weighted average rates for the comparable periods. It is difficult to predict how much foreign currency exchange rates will fluctuate in the future and how those fluctuations will impact our consolidated statement of operations. Due to the expansion of our international operations, these fluctuations have become material on individual balances. However, because both the revenues and expenses are denominated in the local currency of the country in which they are derived or incurred, the impact of currency fluctuations on our operating income and operating margin is mitigated. In order to provide a framework for assessing how our underlying businesses performed excluding the effect of foreign currency fluctuations, we compare the percentage change in the results from one period to another period in this report using constant currency disclosure. The constant currency growth rates are calculated by translating the 2009 results at the 2010 average exchange rates.
The following table is a comparison of underlying average exchange rates of the foreign currencies that had the most significant impact on our U.S. dollar-reported revenues and expenses:
British pound sterling
Canadian dollar
Euro
45
Results of Operations
Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
Revenues
Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Other Expenses, Net
Net Income
Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Net Income Attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated
Adjusted OIBDA(1)
Adjusted OIBDA Margin(1)
46
REVENUES
Core Service
Total Core Revenue
Complementary Services
Total Revenue
Our consolidated storage revenues increased $19.8 million, or 4.8%, to $435.6 million and increased $45.2 million, or 5.5%, to $870.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from $415.8 million and $825.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The increase is attributable to internal revenue growth of 3.2% and 3.3% for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Gains were moderated by economic effects that have constrained storage volume growth in recent quarters. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations added approximately 1.5% and 2.1% to our storage revenue growth rate for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Current economic factors resulting in lower pricing and longer new sales cycles in our digital business and lower new sales and higher destruction rates in our physical business led to a moderation in our storage growth rate.
Consolidated service revenues consisting of core service and complementary services increased $13.9 million, or 4.2%, to $344.1 million and increased $41.7 million, or 6.5%, to $685.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from $330.2 million and $643.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Service revenue internal growth was 1.0% and 2.7% for the three and six month periods as complementary service revenue internal growth of 5.1% and 10.6% for the three and six month periods was offset by negative core service revenue internal growth of 0.6% and 0.3% in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. Complementary service revenues increased on a year-over-year basis primarily due to $22.3 million more revenue from the sale of recycled paper resulting from higher recycled paper pricing in the first half of 2010 compared to the first half of 2009. Core service revenue internal growth in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was constrained by current economic trends and pressures on activity-based service revenues related to the handling and transportation of items in storage. Favorable foreign currency exchange rate
47
fluctuations for the three and six months of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 increased reported service revenues by 2.2% and 3.0%, respectively.
For the reasons stated above, our consolidated revenues increased $33.8 million, or 4.5%, to $779.8 million for the three months ended and increased $86.9 million, or 5.9%, to $1,556.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, from $746.0 million and $1,469.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Internal revenue growth was 2.2% and 3.0% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. We calculate internal revenue growth in local currency for our international operations. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations positively impacted our reported revenues by 1.8% and 2.5%, respectively, primarily due to the strengthening of the British pound sterling, Canadian dollar and Euro against the U.S. dollar, based on an analysis of weighted average rates for the comparable periods.
Internal Growth—Eight-Quarter Trend
Storage Revenue
Service Revenue
During the past eight quarters our storage internal growth rate has ranged between 3% and 8%. The internal growth rate for service revenue is inherently more volatile than the storage revenue internal growth rate due to the more discretionary nature of certain complementary services we offer, such as large special projects, software licenses, and the volatility of prices for recycled paper. These revenues are often event driven and impacted to a greater extent by economic downturns as customers defer or cancel the purchase of certain services as a way to reduce their short-term costs, and may be difficult to replicate in future periods. As a commodity, recycled paper prices are subject to the volatility of that market. We expect our consolidated internal revenue growth for 2010 to be approximately 3%. The internal growth rate for service revenues reflects the following: (1) growth in North American storage-related service revenues, increased special project revenues and higher recycled paper revenues through the third quarter of 2008; (2) a large public sector contract in Europe that was completed in the third quarter of 2008; (3) declines in commodity prices for recycled paper and fuel, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, and improving through the end of 2009 and into the second quarter of 2010; (4) the expected softness in our complementary service revenues, such as project revenues and fulfillment services, beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008; and (5) pressures on activity-based service revenues related to the handling and transportation of items in storage and secure shredding.
48
OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of Sales
Consolidated cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) is comprised of the following expenses (in thousands):
Labor
Facilities
Transportation
Product Cost of Sales and Other
Labor expense was unfavorably impacted by 2.0 and 2.9 percentage points of currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Excluding the effect of currency rate fluctuations, labor expense decreased in constant currency terms by 4.2% and 2.7% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, primarily due to productivity gains in our North American Physical Business.
Facilities costs were unfavorably impacted by 1.8 and 2.6 percentage points of currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. The largest component of our facilities cost is rent expense, which, in constant currency terms, increased by $1.4 million for the first six months of 2010 over the first six months of 2009, but remained flat at approximately 12% of consolidated storage revenues for both the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010. Other facilities costs decreased by approximately $3.3 million in constant currency terms for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to decreases in utilities costs of approximately $4.1 million, which was partially offset by increased property taxes and insurance of $1.0 million.
49
Transportation expenses were unfavorably impacted by 1.7 and 2.4 percentage points of currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Transportation expenses decreased in constant currency terms during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to 2009. A decrease of $2.5 million in vehicle lease expense for the first six months of 2010 compared to the first six months of 2009 was due to the capitalization of leased vehicles upon renewal. The lease cost did not change, but the categorization of charges did, resulting in the cost now being allocated to depreciation and interest. There was also a $1.7 million decrease in courier subcontractor costs in the first six months of 2010 compared to the first six months of 2009, reflecting the benefit of productivity gains from ongoing transportation improvement initiatives.
Product cost of sales and other, which includes cartons, media and other service, storage and supply costs, is highly correlated to complementary revenue streams. These costs were unfavorably impacted by 2.7 percentage points of currency rate changes during the six months ended June 30, 2010. For the six months ending June 30, 2010, product cost of sales and other increased by $2.7 million as compared to the prior year on an actual basis.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses are comprised of the following expenses (in thousands):
General and Administrative
Sales, Marketing & Account Management
Information Technology
Bad Debt Expense
50
General and administrative expenses were unfavorably impacted by 1.6 and 2.3 percentage points of currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. In constant currency terms, compensation expense, including medical and other benefits, decreased by $1.9 million and increased by $4.8 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, over the same periods in 2009. The increase during the six months ended June 30, 2010 is primarily a result of merit increases, $1.1 million of incremental cost related to the acquisition of Mimosa Systems, Inc ("Mimosa"), and increased headcount primarily related to our continued investment in our hybrid records management services. In addition, legal costs and professional fees (related to project and cost saving initiatives) increased $4.6 million and $9.2 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
Sales, marketing and account management expenses were unfavorably impacted by 1.3 and 2.0 percentage points of currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. In constant currency terms, the increase of $9.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010 is primarily related to increased compensation of $7.1 million, as a result of merit increases, $3.5 million of incremental cost related to the Mimosa acquisition, and increased discretionary spending of $3.0 million associated with various marketing programs and initiatives, partially offset by a decline in commission expense of $0.8 million.
Information technology expenses were unfavorably impacted by 0.9 and 1.2 percentage points of currency rate changes during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. In constant currency terms, information technology expenses increased $8.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010 due to increased compensation of $4.8 million, of which $2.7 million relates to the Mimosa acquisition, and increased professional fees of $2.9 million.
Consolidated bad debt expense decreased $0.4 million to $3.6 million (0.5% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from $4.0 million (0.5% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Consolidated bad debt expense increased $0.8 million to $8.2 million (0.5% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from $7.4 million (0.5% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2009. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts that is calculated based on our past loss experience, current and prior trends in our aged receivables, current economic conditions, and specific circumstances of individual receivable balances. We continue to monitor our customers' payment activity and make adjustments based on their financial condition and in light of historical and expected trends.
Depreciation, Amortization, and (Gain) Loss on Disposal/Writedown of Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Depreciation expense increased $5.3 million and $14.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to additional depreciation expense related to capital expenditures and acquisitions, including storage systems, which include racking, building and leasehold improvements, computer systems hardware and software, and buildings.
51
Amortization expense increased $1.4 million and $2.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to the increased amortization of intangible assets, such as customer relationship intangible assets and intellectual property acquired through business combinations.
Consolidated gain on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net of $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, consisted primarily of a gain on the disposition of certain owned equipment of $2.7 million in North America, offset by impairment losses related to certain owned facilities in North America of $1.6 million.
Consolidated gain on disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net of $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, consisted primarily of a $1.9 million gain on an owned storage facility in France, which was taken by eminent domain in the first quarter of 2009, offset by write-offs of certain fixed assets in North America and Europe.
OPERATING INCOME and ADJUSTED OIBDA
As a result of all the foregoing factors, consolidated operating income increased $12.4 million, or 9.0%, to $150.4 million (19.3% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from $138.1 million (18.5% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2009. As a result of all the foregoing factors, consolidated operating income increased $23.9 million, or 9.2%, to $283.1 million (18.2% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from $259.3 million (17.6% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Consolidated Adjusted OIBDA increased $18.1 million, or 8.3%, to $235.6 million (30.2% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2010 from $217.5 million (29.2% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2009. As a result of all the foregoing factors, consolidated Adjusted OIBDA increased $39.6 million, or 9.6%, to $453.0 million (29.1% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 from $413.4 million (28.1% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
OTHER EXPENSES, NET
Interest Expense, Net
Consolidated interest expense, net increased $1.1 million to $56.2 million (7.2% of consolidated revenues) and $2.1 million to $112.8 million (7.2% of consolidated revenue) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from $55.2 million (7.4% of consolidated revenues) and $110.7 million (7.5% of consolidated revenues) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to an increase in our weighted average interest rate, which was 6.8% and 7.0% as of June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.
Other (Income) Expense, Net (in thousands)
52
Net foreign currency transaction losses of $8.9 million, based on period-end exchange rates, were recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2010. Losses resulted primarily from changes in the exchange rate of the British pound sterling, certain Latin American currencies and the Euro against the U.S. dollar compared to December 31, 2009, as these currencies relate to our intercompany balances with and between our European and Latin American subsidiaries, offset by gains as a result of British pound sterling and forward foreign currency swap contracts and Euro denominated bonds held by IMI.
Net foreign currency transaction gains of $9.6 million, based on period-end exchange rates, were recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2009. Gains resulted primarily from changes in the exchange rate of the British pound sterling, Brazilian Real and Chilean Peso against the U.S. dollar compared to December 31, 2008, as these currencies relate to our intercompany balances with and between our European and Latin American subsidiaries, offset by losses as a result of British pound sterling denominated debt and forward contracts, as well as changes in the exchange rate of the Russian Ruble against the U.S. dollar, as it relates to our intercompany balances with and between our European subsidiaries.
The charge of $4.7 million included in other (income) expense, net in the six months ended June 30, 2010 consists of losses related to the impact of the change in IME's fiscal year-end. Since its inception, IME has operated with an October 31 fiscal year-end. Therefore, IME's financial results have historically been consolidated with IMI's results with a two month lag. In order to better align our European processes with the enterprise, the IME fiscal year-end was changed to December 31 to match our fiscal year-end. The $4.7 million charge represents the net impact of this change for the two years ended December 31, 2009.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was 13.6% and 28.4%, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 was 53.7% and 57.1%, respectively, resulting in an increase of $34.7 million and $44.6 million in the provision for income taxes, respectively, over the same prior year periods. The primary reconciling items between the federal statutory rate of 35% and our overall effective tax rate are state income taxes (net of federal benefit) and differences in the rates of tax at which our foreign earnings are subject, including foreign exchange gains and losses in different jurisdictions with different tax rates. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, foreign currency gains were recorded in lower tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of intercompany loan positions while foreign currency losses were recorded in higher tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of debt and derivative instruments, which reduced the 2009 tax rate by 25.8% and 11.6% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, foreign currency gains were recorded in higher tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of debt and derivative instruments while foreign currency losses were recorded in lower tax jurisdictions associated with our marking-to-market of intercompany loan positions, which increased the 2010 tax rate by 13.1% and 16.0% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. We provide for income taxes during interim periods based on our estimate of the effective tax rate for the year. Discrete items and changes in our estimate of the annual effective tax rate are recorded in the period they occur.
Our effective tax rate is subject to future variability due to, among other items: (a) changes in the mix of income from foreign jurisdictions; (b) tax law changes; (c) volatility in foreign exchange gains and (losses); and (d) the timing of the establishment and reversal of tax reserves. We are subject to income taxes in both the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. We are subject to examination by various tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we have significant business operations. We regularly assess the likelihood of additional assessments by tax authorities and provide for these matters as appropriate. Although we believe our tax estimates are appropriate, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could result in changes in our estimates.
53
NET INCOME
As a result of all the foregoing factors, consolidated net income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased $45.8 million, or 52.3%, to $41.8 million (5.4% of consolidated revenues) from net income of $87.5 million (11.7% of consolidated revenues) for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Consolidated net income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased $46.9 million, or 40.9%, to $67.6 million (4.3% of consolidated revenues) from net income of $114.5 million (7.8% of consolidated revenues) for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The increase in operating income noted above, offset by the foreign currency exchange rate impacts and the impact of the change in IME's fiscal year-end included in other income (expense), net and the impact of our tax rate for the first six months of 2010 and the resulting increase in the provision for income taxes described above, contributed to the decrease in net income. Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests was $0.1 million and $2.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and resulted in a benefit to net income attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, net income attributable to noncontrolling interests resulted in a decrease in net income attributable to Iron Mountain Incorporated of $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively. These represent our noncontrolling partners' share of earnings/losses in our majority-owned international subsidiaries that are consolidated in our operating results.
Segment Analysis (in thousands)
Corporate and our operating segments are discussed below. Our reportable operating segments are North American Physical Business, International Physical Business and Worldwide Digital Business. See Note 7 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Our North American Physical Business, which consists of the United States and Canada, offers the storage of paper documents, as well as all other non-electronic media such as microfilm and microfiche, master audio and videotapes, film, X-rays and blueprints, including healthcare information services, vital records services, service and courier operations, and the collection, handling and disposal of sensitive documents for corporate customers ("Hard Copy"); the storage and rotation of backup computer media as part of corporate disaster recovery plans, including service and courier operations ("Data Protection"); information destruction services ("Destruction"); and the storage, assembly, and detailed reporting of customer marketing literature and delivery to sales offices, trade shows and prospective customers' sites based on current and prospective customer orders ("Fulfillment"). Our International Physical Business segment offers information management services throughout Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific, including Hard Copy, Data Protection and Destruction (in the U.K., Australia and New Zealand). Our Worldwide Digital Business offers information management services for electronic records conveyed via telecommunication lines and the Internet, including online backup and recovery solutions for server data and personal computers, as well as email archiving, third party intellectual property escrow services that protect intellectual property assets such as software source code, and electronic discovery services for the legal market that offers in-depth discovery and data investigation solutions. Corporate consists of costs related to executive and staff functions, including finance, human resources and information technology, which benefit the enterprise as a whole. These costs primarily relate to the general management of these functions on a corporate level and the design and development of programs, policies and procedures that are then implemented in the individual segments, with each segment bearing its own cost of implementation. Corporate also includes stock-based employee compensation expense associated with all employee stock-based awards.
54
North American Physical Business
Segment Revenue
Segment Adjusted OIBDA(1)
Segment Adjusted OIBDA(1) as a Percentage of Segment Revenue
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, revenue in our North American Physical Business segment increased 4.7% over the six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to internal growth of 3.2%. Internal growth was due to storage internal growth of 3.3% related to increased Hard Copy and Data Protection revenues and service internal growth of 3.2%. Current economic factors have led to a moderation in our storage growth rate, as a result of lower new sales and higher destruction rates in our physical business. Core service revenue growth was also constrained by current economic trends and pressures on activity-based services revenues related to the handling and transportation of items in storage. Our core services business yielded negative internal growth of 2.3%, which was more than offset by complementary services revenues internal growth of 19.8%, due primarily to higher recycled paper prices. Additionally, favorable foreign currency rate changes related to Canada resulted in increased 2010 revenue, as measured in U.S. dollars, of 1.5%. Adjusted OIBDA as a percentage of segment revenue increased in 2010 due mainly to productivity gains, pricing actions, disciplined cost management, partially offset by a $4.2 million increase in professional fees (related to project and cost savings initiatives).
International Physical Business
55
Revenue in our International Physical Business segment increased 10.5% during the six months ended June 30, 2010 over the same period last year due to foreign currency fluctuations in 2010, primarily in Europe, which resulted in increased 2010 revenue, as measured in U.S. dollars, compared to 2009 of approximately 6.3%. Total internal revenue growth for the segment was 3.8%, supported by solid 6.0% storage internal growth and strong core services internal growth of 5.1%. These gains were offset slightly by the 8.7% reduction in complementary revenue internal growth. Adjusted OIBDA as a percentage of segment revenue decreased in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to increased compensation expense related to investments in our hybrid records management services, partially offset by productivity gains, pricing actions and disciplined cost management.
Worldwide Digital Business
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, revenue in our Worldwide Digital Business segment increased 3.8% over the same period in 2009. Mimosa, which we acquired in February 2010, contributed $5.2 million, or a 4.6% increase in revenue. This increase was offset by lower pricing and longer new sales cycles in our digital business. In the six months ended June 30, 2010, Adjusted OIBDA in the Worldwide Digital Business segment decreased compared to the same period in 2009 due to the impact of revenue mix and increased costs associated with the integration of Mimosa.
56
Corporate
Segment Adjusted OIBDA(1) as a Percentage of Consolidated Revenue
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, expenses in the Corporate segment increased 14.7% over the six months ended June 30, 2009. This increase is primarily driven by higher professional fees of $5.5 million related to productivity and cost saving initiatives, an insurance deductible of $2.9 million associated with the recent Chilean earthquake, increased stock-based compensation of $1.7 million, other expenses including marketing, recruiting and telephone and, to a lesser extent, increased compensation reflecting merit increases and higher benefit costs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following is a summary (in thousands) of our cash balances and cash flows as of and for the six months ended June 30,
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period
Net cash provided by operating activities was $268.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to $248.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The 8.0% increase resulted primarily from an increase in working capital of $28.4 million, an increase in various non-cash charges of $11.5 million, and an increase in realized foreign exchange gains of $8.2 million, offset by a decrease in net income, excluding non-cash charges of $28.3 million over the same period last year.
Due to the nature of our businesses, we make significant capital expenditures and additions to customer acquisition costs, which are included in cash flows from investing activities. Our capital expenditures are primarily related to growth and include investments in storage systems, information systems and discretionary investments in real estate. Cash paid for our capital expenditures, cash paid for acquisitions (net of cash acquired) and additions to customer acquisition costs during the six months ended June 30, 2010 amounted to $138.0 million, $122.9 million and $5.5 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, capital expenditures, net, cash paid for acquisitions (net of cash acquired) and additions to customer acquisition costs were funded with cash flows provided by operating activities and cash equivalents on hand. Excluding potential future acquisitions, we expect our
57
capital expenditures to be approximately $280 million in the year ending December 31, 2010. Included in our estimated capital expenditures for 2010 is approximately $20 million of opportunity-driven real estate purchases.
Net cash used in financing activities was $79.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we had gross borrowings under our revolving credit and term loan facilities and other debt of $39.9 million, $9.2 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options and employee stock purchase plan and $1.3 million of excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation. We used the proceeds from these financing transactions to repay $66.2 million on our revolving credit and term loans and other debt, $50.6 million to repurchase our common stock and $12.7 million to pay dividends on our common stock.
In February 2010, our board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing up to $150.0 million in repurchases of our common stock. This represented approximately 3% of our outstanding common stock based on the closing price on February 19, 2010. All purchases are subject to stock price, market conditions, corporate and legal requirements and other factors. In addition, in February 2010, our board of directors adopted a dividend policy under which we intend to pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock. The first quarterly dividend of $0.0625 per share was paid on April 15, 2010 to shareholders of record on March 25, 2010 in the aggregate amount of $12.7 million. The second quarterly dividend of $0.0625 per share was paid on July 15, 2010 to shareholders of record on June 25, 2010 in the aggregate amount of $12.6 million. Declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board of directors. If we continue the $0.0625 per share quarterly dividend we anticipate that the 2010 annual dividend payout will be approximately $50 million based on our total outstanding shares as of February 19, 2010 (of which the fourth quarter 2010 payment would not be paid until January, 2011, if declared).
The following table is a summary of our repurchase activity under all of our share repurchase programs during the first six months of 2010:
Prior year authorization as of January 1,
Authorizations
Repurchases paid
Repurchases unsettled
Authorization remaining as of June 30,
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to market risk consist principally of cash, money market funds and time deposits. As of June 30, 2010, we had significant concentrations of liquid investments with eight global banks and seven "Triple A" rated money market funds which we consider to be large, highly rated investment grade institutions. As of June 30, 2010, our cash and cash equivalent and restricted cash balance was $375.6 million, including money market funds and time deposits amounting to $266.7 million. A substantial portion of these money market funds are invested in U.S. treasuries.
58
We are highly leveraged and expect to continue to be highly leveraged for the foreseeable future. Our consolidated debt as of June 30, 2010 was comprised of the following (in thousands):
71/4% GBP Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014(2)
73/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015(2)
65/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016(2)
71/2% CAD Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017(the "Subsidiary Notes")(3)
83/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018(2)
8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018(2)
63/4% Euro Senior Subordinated Notes due 2018(2)
8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2020(2)
83/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2021(2)
Real Estate Mortgages, Capital Leases and Other
Our credit facility consists of revolving credit facilities, where we can borrow, subject to certain limitations as defined in the credit agreement we entered into on April 16, 2007 governing this facility (the "Credit Agreement"), up to an aggregate amount of $765 million (including Canadian dollar and multi-currency revolving credit facilities), and a $410 million term loan facility. Our revolving credit facility is supported by a group of 24 banks. Our subsidiaries, Canada Company and Iron Mountain Switzerland GmbH, may borrow directly under the Canadian revolving credit and multi-currency revolving credit facilities, respectively. Additional subsidiary borrowers may be added under the multi-currency revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility terminates on April 16, 2012. With respect to the term loan facility, quarterly loan payments of approximately $1.0 million are required through maturity on April 16, 2014, at which time the remaining outstanding principal balance of the term loan facility is due. The interest rate on borrowings under the Credit Agreement varies depending on our choice of interest rate and currency options, plus an applicable margin. IMI guarantees the obligations of each of the subsidiary borrowers under the Credit Agreement, and substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries guarantee the obligations of IMI and the subsidiary borrowers. The capital stock or other equity interests of most of our U.S. subsidiaries, and up to 66% of the capital stock or other equity
59
interests of our first tier foreign subsidiaries, are pledged to secure the Credit Agreement, together with all intercompany obligations of foreign subsidiaries owed to us or to one of our U.S. subsidiary guarantors. As of June 30, 2010, we had $12.1 million of outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility, of which $4.5 million was denominated in U.S. dollars and the remaining balance was denominated in Euro (EUR 2.7 million) and Australian dollars (AUD 5.0 million); we also had various outstanding letters of credit totaling $2.6 million. The remaining availability, based on IMI's leverage ratio, which is calculated based on the last 12 months' earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization ("EBITDA"), and other adjustments as defined in the Credit Agreement and current external debt, under the revolving credit facility on June 30, 2010, was $750.4 million. The interest rate in effect under the revolving credit facility and term loan facility was 3.2% and 2.1%, respectively, as of June 30, 2010.
The Credit Agreement, our indentures and other agreements governing our indebtedness contain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants, including covenants that restrict our ability to complete acquisitions, pay cash dividends, incur indebtedness, make investments, sell assets and take certain other corporate actions. The covenants do not contain a rating trigger. Therefore, a change in our debt rating would not trigger a default under the Credit Agreement and our indentures and other agreements governing our indebtedness. Our revolving credit and term loan facilities, as well as our indentures, use EBITDA-based calculations as primary measure of financial performance, including leverage ratios. IMI's revolving credit and term leverage ratio was 3.3 and 3.1 as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to a maximum allowable ratio of 5.5. Similarly, our bond leverage ratio, per the indentures, was 4.1 and 3.8 as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to a maximum allowable ratio of 6.5. Noncompliance with these leverage ratios would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity. We were in compliance with all debt covenants in material agreements as of June 30, 2010 and we do not expect the debt covenants and restrictions to limit our recently approved share repurchase program or dividends under our dividend policy as more fully discussed above.
Our ability to pay interest on or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our future performance, working capital levels and capital structure, which are subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors which may be beyond our control. There can be no assurance that we will generate sufficient cash flow from our operations or that future financings will be available on acceptable terms or in amounts sufficient to enable us to service or refinance our indebtedness, or to make necessary capital expenditures.
In February 2010, we acquired 100% of Mimosa, a leader in enterprise-class digital content archiving solutions, for approximately $112 million in cash. Mimosa, based in Santa Clara, California, provides an on-premises integrated archive for email, SharePoint data and files, and complements our existing enterprise-class, cloud-based digital archive services. NearPoint, Mimosa's enterprise archiving platform, has applications for retention and disposition, eDiscovery, compliance supervision, classification, recovery, and end-user search, enabling customers to reduce risk, and lower their eDiscovery and storage costs.
To expand our geographical footprint in Europe, in May 2010 we acquired the remaining 87% interest of our joint venture in Greece (Safe doc S.A.) for a cash purchase price of approximately $4.7 million and now control 100% of our Greek operations, which provide storage and records management services. The carrying value of the 13% interest that we had previously acquired and accounted for under the equity method of accounting amounted to approximately $0.4 million and the fair value of such interest on the date of acquisition was approximately $0.5 million and resulted in a gain being recorded on the date of transaction to other (income) expense, net included in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations of approximately $0.1 million during the second quarter of 2010.
60
During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we received payments from our insurance carrier of approximately $21.0 million. Such amount represents a portion of our business personal property, business interruption, and expense claims filed with our insurance carriers. We expect to utilize cash from our insurance settlements to fund capital expenditures and for general working capital needs. Recoveries from the business interruption portion of our insurance claim will be recorded as other income in the consolidated statement of operations when received. We expect to receive proceeds from our property claims that exceed the carrying value of the related assets. We, therefore, expect to record gains on the disposal/writedown of property, plant and equipment, net in our statement of operations in future periods when cash received to date exceeds the carrying value of the related property, plant and equipment, net. Proceeds from our business personal property claims are reflected in our statement of cash flows under proceeds from sales of property and equipment and other, net included in the investing activities section when received. We have reflected approximately $6.4 million of the cash proceeds received to date as proceeds from sales of property and equipment, net, in our statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Proceeds from our business interruption claims are reflected in our statement of cash flows as a component of net income included in the operating activities section when received.
In August 2010, we called $200 million of the $431.3 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 73/4% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 (the "73/4% notes") at a redemption price of 101.292% for each one thousand dollars of principal amount of notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, all of which will be paid in September 2010. We will record a charge to other expense (income), net of approximately $1.8 million in the third quarter of 2010 related to the early extinguishment of the 73/4% notes being redeemed. This charge consists of the call premium and deferred financing costs, net of original issue premiums related to the 73/4% notes.
We expect to meet our cash flow requirements for the next twelve months from cash generated from operations, existing cash, cash equivalents, borrowings under the Credit Agreement and other financings, which may include secured credit facilities, securitizations and mortgage or capital lease financings. We expect to meet our long-term cash flow requirements using the same means described above, as well as the potential issuance of debt or equity securities as we deem appropriate. See Notes 3, 5, and 8 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net Operating Losses, Research Credits and Foreign Tax Credit Carryforwards
We have federal net operating loss carryforwards of $91.6 million ($32.0 million, tax effected) which begin to expire in 2019 through 2029, to reduce future federal taxable income at June 30, 2010. We have an asset for state net operating losses of $19.7 million (net of federal tax benefit), which begins to expire in 2010 through 2029, subject to a valuation allowance of approximately 81%. We have assets for foreign net operating losses of $29.7 million, with various expiration dates, subject to a valuation allowance of approximately 81%. Additionally, at June 30, 2010, we have federal research credits of $2.9 million, which begin to expire in 2010 through 2029 and state research credits of approximately $1 million (net of federal tax benefit) which begin to expire in 2025 through 2029. We also have foreign tax credits of $67.2 million, which begin to expire in 2014 through 2020. Based on
61
current expectations and plans, we expect to fully utilize our foreign tax credit carryforwards prior to their expiration. All figures include amounts recorded as part of the Mimosa acquisition.
Inflation
Certain of our expenses, such as wages and benefits, insurance, occupancy costs and equipment repair and replacement, are subject to normal inflationary pressures. Although to date we have been able to offset inflationary cost increases through increased operating efficiencies and the negotiation of favorable long-term real estate leases, we can give no assurance that we will be able to offset any future inflationary cost increases through similar efficiencies, leases or increased storage or service charges.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The term "disclosure controls and procedures" is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information is recorded, processed, summarized and communicated to management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding what is required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act. As of June 30, 2010 (the "Evaluation Date"), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
62
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In May 2006, we filed an eviction lawsuit against a tenant, Digital Encoding Factory, LLC ("DEF"), leasing space in our Boyers, Pennsylvania records storage facility for its failure to make required rent payments. In October 2006, DEF and two related companies, EDA Acquisition, LLC, and Media Holdings, LLC, filed a lawsuit against us in U.S. Federal District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania alleging that they started a digital scanning business in our Boyers, Pennsylvania, records storage facility because we verbally agreed to refer customer digital scanning business in the facility to them (the "Pittsburgh Lawsuit") and promised substantial business. The plaintiffs contended that we breached this alleged verbal agreement and sought to recover damages in the range of $6.5 million to $53.5 million. We disputed the plaintiffs' claims and contended that there was no such verbal agreement. A bench trial occurred in the case in March 2010. In July 2010, we executed an agreement with the plaintiffs settling the case before the judge reached a decision in the matter. The legal proceedings related to this event did not have a material impact to our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
In July 2006, we experienced a significant fire in a leased records and information management facility in London, England, that resulted in the complete destruction of the facility and its contents. The London Fire Brigade ("LFB") issued a report in which it was concluded that the fire resulted either from human agency, i.e., arson, or an unidentified ignition device or source, and its report to the Home Office concluded that the fire resulted from a deliberate act. The LFB also concluded that the installed sprinkler system failed to control the fire due to the primary electric fire pump being disabled prior to the fire and the standby diesel fire pump being disabled in the early stages of the fire by third-party contractors. We have received notices of claims from customers or their subrogated insurance carriers under various theories of liabilities arising out of lost data and/or records as a result of the fire. Certain of those claims have resulted in litigation in courts in the United Kingdom. We deny any liability in respect of the London fire and we have referred these claims to our excess warehouse legal liability insurer, which has been defending them to date under a reservation of rights. Certain of the claims have been settled for nominal amounts, typically one to two British pounds sterling per carton, as specified in the contracts, which amounts have been or will be reimbursed to us from our primary property insurer. An entity that provided certain security services related to the destroyed facility as a contractor to us is a defendant in an action by the owner of the property, seeking damages in the amount of approximately 10.7 million British pounds sterling for negligence and breach of duty. The security service provider recently petitioned the court hearing the matter to join Iron Mountain (UK) as a third party defendant, seeking contribution in respect of its liability (if any) to the owner of the building, and the court has granted the motion. We believe there are meritorious defenses available to us with respect to the claim. Many claims, including substantial claims, remain outstanding; others have been resolved pursuant to consent orders. We believe we carry adequate property and liability insurance. We do not expect that legal proceedings related to this event will have a material impact to our consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
63
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
There were no sales of unregistered securities for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The following table sets forth our common stock repurchased for the three months ended June 30, 2010:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
April 1, 2010 - April 30, 2010
May 1, 2010 - May 31, 2010
June 1, 2010 - June 30, 2010
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
64
65
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
August 5, 2010
By:
/s/ BRIAN P. MCKEON
(DATE)
66