================================================================================ UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (mark one) |X| QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 1999 OR |_| TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED) For the transition period from to Commission file number 0-22418 ITRON, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Washington 91-1011792 (State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 2818 North Sullivan Road Spokane, Washington 99216-1897 (509) 924-9900 (Address and telephone number of registrant's principal executive offices) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes__X___ No_____ As of July 31, 1999, there were outstanding 14,887,138 shares of the registrant's common stock, no par value, which is the only class of common or voting stock of the registrant. ================================================================================
Part 1: Financial Information Item 1: Financial Statements ITRON, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data) <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, ========================================================================================================================= 1999 1998 1999 1998 <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> -------------- ---------------- -------------- --------------- Revenues AMR systems $29,054 $44,235 $ 59,973 $ 94,591 Handheld systems 16,391 11,530 32,738 21,210 Outsourcing 5,776 5,004 10,455 8,676 -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- Total revenues 51,221 60,769 103,166 124,477 Cost of revenues AMR systems 18,997 30,656 38,668 65,424 Handheld systems 10,000 5,991 19,140 11,116 Outsourcing 5,023 4,154 8,856 7,174 -------------- -------------- --------------- --------------- Total costs of revenues 34,020 40,801 66,664 83,714 -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- Gross profit 17,201 19,968 36,502 40,763 Operating expenses Sales and marketing 7,061 6,976 13,495 13,570 Product development 6,953 8,997 13,555 17,920 General and administrative 3,362 3,287 6,387 6,304 Amortization of intangibles 490 588 980 1,179 Restructuring charges - - 1,121 - -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- Total operating expenses 17,866 19,848 35,538 38,973 -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- Operating income (loss) (665) 120 964 1,790 Other income (expense) Equity in affiliates (146) (230) (311) (350) Interest, net (1,443) (1,636) (3,298) (2,933) -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- Total other income (expense) (1,589) (1,866) (3,609) (3,283) Income (loss) before extraordinary item and Income (2,254) (1,746) (2,645) (1,493) taxes Income tax (provision) benefit 670 670 830 570 -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- Net income (loss) before extraordinary item (1,584) (1,076) (1,815) (923) Extraordinary gain on extinguishment - - 3,660 - of debt, net of income taxes of $1,970 -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- Net income (loss) $(1,584) $ (1,076) $ 1,845 $ (923) -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- Basic net income (loss) per share: Before extraordinary item $ (0.11) $ (0.07) $ (0.12) $(0.06) Extraordinary item - - 0.25 - -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- Basic net income (loss) per share $ (0.11) $ (0.07) $ 0.12 $(0.06) Diluted net income (loss) per share: Before extraordinary item $ (0.11) $ (0.07) $ (0.12) $(0.06) Extraordinary item - - 0.24 - -------------- -------------- -------------- --------------- Diluted net income (loss) per share $ (0.11) $ (0.07) $ 0.12 $(0.06) </TABLE> The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<TABLE> <CAPTION> ITRON, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited, in thousands) June 30, December 31, ======================================================================================================================== 1999 1998 <S> <C> <C> ---------------- ---------------- Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,888 $ 2,743 Accounts receivable, net 46,269 62,253 Current portion of long-term contracts receivable 14,552 13,498 Inventories 20,328 20,654 Deferred income taxes, net 5,803 6,938 Other 1,285 2,306 ----------------- ---------------- Total current assets 91,125 108,392 ----------------- ---------------- Property, plant and equipment, net 39,497 42,390 Equipment used in outsourcing, net 53,939 50,746 Intangible assets, net 16,627 18,142 Long-term contracts receivable 27,228 23,712 Other 4,135 4,373 ----------------- ---------------- Total assets $ 232,551 $ 247,755 ----------------- ---------------- Liabilities and shareholders' equity Current liabilities Short-term borrowings $ 8,824 $ 14,000 Accounts payable and accrued expenses 22,490 25,263 Wages and benefits payable 7,019 6,246 Deferred revenue 5,030 8,653 ----------------- ---------------- Total current liabilities 43,363 54,162 ----------------- ---------------- Convertible subordinated debt 57,234 63,400 Mortgage notes payable 6,162 6,242 Project financing 7,474 7,722 Warranty and other obligations 1,100 1,207 ----------------- ---------------- Total noncurrent liabilities 71,970 78,571 ----------------- ---------------- Shareholders' equity Common stock 106,783 106,039 Retained earnings 11,935 10,090 Other (1,500) (1,107) ----------------- ---------------- Total shareholders' equity 117,218 115,022 ----------------- ---------------- Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ 232,551 $ 247,755 ----------------- ---------------- </TABLE> The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
<TABLE> <CAPTION> ITRON, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited, in thousands) Six months ended June 30, ==================================================================================================================================== 1999 1998 --------------- -------------- <S> <C> <C> OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income (loss) $ 1,845 $ (923) Noncash charges (credits) to income: Depreciation and amortization 9,347 9,292 Deferred income tax provision (benefit) (841) (513) Equity in affiliates, net 311 350 Extraordinary gain on extinguishment of debt (3,660) - Changes in operating accounts: Accounts receivable 15,960 194 Inventories 326 7,132 Accounts payable and accrued expenses (3,152) (4,339) Wages and benefits payable 773 (3,790) Long-term contracts receivable (4,570) (5,810) Deferred revenue (3,623) (792) Other, net 251 (1,089) -------------- -------------- Cash provided (used) by operating activities 12,967 (288) -------------- -------------- INVESTING ACTIVITIES Acquisition of property, plant and equipment (3,331) (3,960) Equipment used in outsourcing (4,751) (6,419) Other, net 153 (1,264) -------------- -------------- Cash used by investing activities (7,929) (11,643) -------------- -------------- FINANCING ACTIVITIES Change in short-term borrowings, net (5,176) 8,382 Project financing (248) 5,547 Issuance of common stock 744 1,495 Purchase and retirement of common stock - (1,203) Other, net (213) 445 -------------- -------------- Cash provided (used) by financing activities (4,893) 14,666 -------------- -------------- Increase in cash and equivalents 145 2,735 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 2,743 3,023 -------------- -------------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 2,888 $ 5,758 -------------- -------------- </TABLE> The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
ITRON, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS June 30, 1999 Note 1: Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements presented in this Form 10-Q are unaudited and reflect, in the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of operations for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 1999. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 1999. The results of operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 1999, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full fiscal year or for any other fiscal period. Note 2: Earnings Per Share and Capital Structure <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three Months ended June 30, Six Months ended June 30, (in thousands) 1999 1998 1999 1998 - -------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ---------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Weighted average shares outstanding 14,807 14,686 14,782 14,658 Effect of dilutive securities: Stock options - - 556 - Convertible debt - - - - ----------- ------------ ------------ ---------- Weighted average shares outstanding assuming conversion 14,807 14,686 15,338 14,658 ----------- ------------ ------------ ---------- </TABLE> The Company has granted options to purchase common stock to directors, employees and other key personnel at fair market value on the date of grant. The dilutive effect of these options is included for purposes of calculating dilutive earnings per share ("EPS") using the "treasury stock" method. The Company also has subordinated convertible notes outstanding. These notes are not included in the above calculation as the shares are anti-dilutive in all periods when using the "if converted" method. Note 3: Restructuring In 1998, in connection with management's measures to reduce costs and improve operating efficiencies, the Company recorded a restructuring charge of $3.9 million. During the first quarter of 1999 the Company recorded a further restructuring charge of $1.1 million as part of its ongoing efforts to improve operating efficiencies. The restructuring measures primarily involved a workforce reduction, the write-off of certain of the Company's intangible assets and the closure and consolidation of facilities. Cumulative restructuring charges of $5.1 million are as follows: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Reserve Cash/ Restructuring Balance (in thousands) Non-Cash Charge Activity 06/30/99 ================================================= ================ ============= ============= =========== <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> Severance and related charges Cash $ 2,658 $ 2,103 $ 555 Write-down of intangible assets Non-Cash 1,104 1,104 - Consolidation of facilities Cash 1,048 - 1,048 Other Non-Cash 241 241 - ------------- ------------ ----------- Total restructuring charge $ 5,051 $ 3,448 $1,603 ------------- ------------ ----------- </TABLE>
Note 4: Balance Sheet Components <TABLE> <CAPTION> June 30, December 31, ==================================================================================================================================== (Inventories, in thousands) 1999 1998 ------------ ------------ <S> <C> <C> Material $ 5,964 $12,498 Work in process 1,460 2,339 Finished goods 9,663 7,240 Field inventories awaiting installation 663 596 ------------ ------------ Total manufacturing inventories 17,750 22,673 Service inventories 2,578 2,180 ------------ ------------ Total inventories $20,328 $ 24,853 ------------ ------------ </TABLE> Note 5: Segment Information While the Company analyzes its operations in various ways, the chief executive officer primarily reviews the Company's manufacturing and sales operations on a domestic vs. international basis and reviews the Company's revenues and cost of sales by the major product lines of AMR systems, handheld systems and outsourcing. The Company has outsourcing agreements in which it both owns and operates AMR systems. These agreements require a large amount of capital investment, with related project and other debt, and long-term contract payments that are predominantly financing payments. Consequently outsourcing accounts are included in the Company's finance operations. Outsourcing contracts in which the Company operates, but does not own, AMR systems are included in the Company's normal manufacturing and sales operations. The chief executive officer reviews financing operations separately from manufacturing and sales operations because they are essentially different businesses with significantly different operating and leverage characteristics. Segment debt and interest expense related to the Company's finance and international operations includes both direct and allocated debt and interest expense. Segment debt and related interest expense are allocated based on each segment's funding requirements for capital or operations. Intersegment revenues include shipments to various Company-owned subsidiaries and are eliminated in consolidation. EBITDA includes earnings for each segment before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and is used to allow a comparison of each segment's operating results. Segment Debt/EBITDA is a ratio that is used to compare segment leverage ratios to comparable industry ratios. The Company does not allocate income taxes to its operating segments. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Six months ended June 30, 1999 ========================================================================================================================= Manufacturing and Sales ------------------------------------- (in thousands, except ratios) Domestic International Total Finance Eliminated Consolidated - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Revenues from external customers: AMR systems $58,903 $ 1,070 $59,973 $ - $ - $ 59,973 Handheld systems 26,161 6,577 32,738 - - 32,738 Outsourcing 656 - 656 9,799 - 10,455 Intersegment revenues 747 24 771 - (771) - ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------- Total revenues $86,467 $ 7,671 $94,138 $ 9,799 $ (771) $103,166 Segment income (loss) (1)(2) 2,657 (3,933) (1,276) 4,150 111 2,985 Segment assets 170,180 10,232 180,412 96,060 (43,921) 232,551 Segment debt 6,854 20,658 27,512 77,324 (24,427) 80,409 Cash flows: Operating activities $18,723 $ (825) $17,898 $ (4,931) $ - $ 12,967 Investing activities (3) (3,190) (73) (3,263) (4,666) - (7,929) ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------- ------------- Net operating and investing $15,533 $ (898) $14,635 $ (9,597) $ - $ 5,038 EBITDA(4) $ 9,346 $ (2,280) $7,066 $ 8,564 $ - $ 15,630 Segment debt/annual EBITDA(5) 0.37 * 1.95 4.51 * 2.57 </TABLE>
<TABLE> <CAPTION> Six months ended June 30, 1998 ========================================================================================================================== Manufacturing and Sales ------------------------------------- (in thousands, except ratios) Domestic International Total Finance Eliminated Consolidated - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Revenues from external customers: AMR systems $90,344 $ 4,247 $94,591 $ - $ - $ 94,591 Handheld systems 15,936 5,274 21,210 - - 21,210 Outsourcing 139 - 139 8,537 - 8,676 Intersegment revenues 1,033 100 1,133 - (1,133) - ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- Total revenues $107,452 $ 9,621 $117,073 $ 8,537 $ (1,133) $124,477 Segment income (loss) (2) 1,755 (2,220) (465) (552) (476) (1,493) Segment assets 170,458 12,000 182,458 73,968 (12,709) 243,717 Segment debt 7,373 17,580 24,953 63,623 - 88,576 Cash flows: Operating activities $ 6,230 $ (1,570) $ 4,660 $ (4,948) $ - $ (288) Investing activities (3) (5,015) (226) (5,241) (6,402) - (11,643) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- ------------- Net operating and investing $ 1,215 $ (1,796) $ ( 581) $(11,350) $ - $ (11,931) EBITDA (4) $ 8,740 $ (808) $ 7,932 $ 2,799 $ - $ 10,731 Segment debt/annual EBITDA (5) 0.42 * 1.57 11.37 * 4.13 </TABLE> (1) Segment income (loss) for Finance includes $5.6 million pre-tax gain on debt extinguishment in 1999 (2) Itron does not allocate income taxes to its segments. (3) Investing activities primarily consist of capital expenditures for each segment. (4) EBITDA is calculated by adding net interest, depreciation and amortization expense to pre-tax income or loss after extraordinary item and is presented because the Company believes that it allows for a more complete analysis of the Company's results of operations. This information should not be considered as an indicator of the Company's overall financial performance. Additionally, EBITDA as reported herein may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. (5) Total debt to annualized EBITDA is calculated by dividing total segment debt by the product of EBITDA multiplied by 2. * Not meaningful. Note 6: Contingencies The Company, together with its Chairman Johnny M. Humphreys, , is a defendant in a class action filed by certain former shareholders in federal court, alleging violations of the federal securities laws arising out of alleged misleading disclosures or omissions made by the Company regarding its business and technology. On June 3, 1999 the Company announced that it reached an agreement to settle this lawsuit by payment of $12 million to the plaintiff class, all of which will be covered by insurance proceeds. The settlement is subject to certain customary conditions, including notice to the potential class members and approval by the court. Neither the Company nor Mr. Humphreys have admitted any wrongdoings or liability and no wrongdoing or liability was found by the court.
Item 2: MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OVERVIEW Itron is a leading global provider of integrated systems solutions for collecting, communicating, analyzing, and managing information about electric, gas and water usage. The Company designs, develops, manufactures, markets, installs and services hardware, software and integrated systems that enable customers to obtain, analyze and use meter data. The Company's major product lines include Automatic Meter Reading ("AMR") systems and Electronic Meter Reading ("EMR") or Handheld systems. The Company both sells its products and provides outsourcing services. The Company's AMR solutions primarily utilize radio and telephone technology to collect meter data and include Off-Site AMR, Mobile AMR and Network AMR technology reading options. Off-Site AMR utilizes a radio device fitted into an Itron handheld computer that collects data from meters equipped with the Company's radio meter modules. Mobile AMR uses a transceiver in a vehicle to collect data from meters equipped with the Company's radio meter modules as the vehicle passes by. The Company offers a number of Network AMR solutions that utilize radio, telephone, cellular or a combination of these technologies to collect and transmit meter information from a variety of fixed locations. The Company's EMR systems product line includes the sale and service of ruggedized handheld computers and supporting products that record visually obtained meter data. Outsourcing services typically involve the installation, operation and/or maintenance of meter reading systems to provide meter information for billing and management purposes. Outsourcing contracts usually cover long timeframes and typically involve contracts in which either a customer owns the equipment and the Company provides meter information for a specified fee, or the Company both owns and operates the system. The Company currently derives substantially all of its revenues from sales of its products and services to utilities, however, the Company's business may increasingly consist of sales to other utility industry participants such as energy service providers, end user customers and others. The Company has experienced variability of operating results on both an annual and a quarterly basis due primarily to utility purchasing patterns, and delays of purchasing decisions. In recent years these delays have generally been a result of changes or potential changes to the federal and state regulatory frameworks within which the electric utility industry operates and mergers and acquisitions in the utility industry, many of which are also driven by deregulation. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Revenues Total Company revenues for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 1999 decreased $9.6 million and $21.3 million from the same periods in 1998. Both the quarter and the six month decreases were primarily due to the substantial completion of one large AMR systems contract in late 1998, which are described in greater detail below. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- (in millions) Increase Increase Revenues 1999 (Decrease) 1998 1999 (Decrease) 1998 -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> AMR systems $29.0 (34%) $44.3 $ 60.0 (37%) $ 94.6 Handheld systems 16.4 42% 11.5 32.7 54% 21.2 Outsourcing 5.8 15% 5.0 10.5 21% 8.7 ------------ --------- ----------- ----------- Total revenues $51.2 (16%) $60.8 $103.2 (17%) $124.5 ============ ========= =========== =========== </TABLE>
AMR systems revenues decreased $15.2 million and $34.6 million in the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 1999 from the same periods in 1998. There were three primary reasons for the decreases. First, a large portion of the decreases was due to meter module shipments in the 1998 periods to Virginia Power ("Virginia"). The Company's contract with Virginia required the installation of a fixed network covering approximately 460,000 meter modules in three separate geographic regions. The majority of the shipments and installation activities for this contract occurred during 1998. This was the most condensed fixed network installation that the Company had ever achieved. Because of the accelerated installation schedule, revenue in 1998 was much higher than in the current periods. Approximately 30% of the quarter and year-to-date AMR revenues in 1998 were from the Virginia contract. Second, the 1999 periods reflect a negotiated $4.2 million price concession from a contract amendment with Virginia for outage detection functionality that Virginia eliminated from the system requirements. The impact of this price concession is reflected in the quarter and year to date 1999 periods as a $4.2 million reduction in revenues, gross profit and operating income. Third, lower installation revenues in 1999 also contributed to the lower AMR revenue in the year. Installation revenues were higher in 1998 because the Company had several contracts for "turn-key" systems in which it was responsible for meter module installation. Average selling prices for meter modules increased somewhat during the 1999 periods, primarily reflecting a shift in mix from electric meter modules to gas and water meter modules. Handheld systems revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 were significantly higher than the same three and six month periods in 1998. The large increases in handheld systems revenues were primarily due to a large number of customers upgrading and replacing systems for their Year 2000 requirements, along with sales of the Company's new portable network ("PN") card for handheld computers. The PN card is a lower cost, lighter weight, credit card sized radio device, which was introduced in late 1998. Outsourcing revenues increased $800,000 for the quarter and $1.8 million for the six-month period in over the same periods in 1998. Outsourcing revenues continue to be driven primarily by the Company's contract with the Duquesne Light Company ("Duquesne"). The Company is currently in the operations phase of its contract with Duquesne, which will continue through 2013. The Company expects that total revenues in the second half of 1999 will be flat or slightly lower than revenues in the first half of the year. Gross Margin Overall gross margins for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 1999 were slightly higher than the same periods in 1998. The percentages for 1999 and 1998 in the table below reflect gross margins as a percentage of corresponding revenues and the percentage point change from the prior year. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, -------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Increase Increase Gross margin 1999 (Decrease) 1998 1999 (Decrease) 1998 -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> AMR systems 35% 4% 31% 36% 5% 31% Handheld systems 39% (9%) 48% 42% (6%) 48% Outsourcing 13% (4%) 17% 15% (2%) 17% Total gross margin 34% 1% 33% 35% 3% 33% </TABLE> AMR systems gross margins for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 increased four and five percentage points respectively, over the comparable periods in 1998, despite the $4.2 million impact of the Virginia contract amendment. Without the revenue reduction in the second quarter of 1999, the Company would have had a gross margin of 39% for the quarter and 38% for the year-to-date period. The margin improvement for both the quarter and the six months reflects the absence of the lower margin contract with Virginia. Additional improvements in the margin for the three and six month periods in 1999 result from a shift in mix from electric to gas meter modules and a smaller proportion of installation activities, which tend to have lower margins, in 1999 than in 1998. The Company expects gross margins to continue to be higher in 1999 than in 1998, because of the absence of the low margin impact from the Virginia contract and a lower proportion of installation activities in 1999 compared to 1998. However, the Company expects more of an impact from manufacturing over-capacity in the second half of 1999 than it experienced in the first six months, due primarily to planned increases in manufacturing and finished goods inventory in the first half of 1999 related to meter module changes. Handheld systems margins decreased by nine percentage points and six percentage points in the three and six months of 1999, respectively, from the 48% level in 1998. The lower margins in the current year were primarily due to lower service margins caused by new warranty periods associated with the new system upgrade sales (during which the Company does not receive service revenues) that the Company provides for customer upgrades. Outsourcing margins of 13% and 15% of revenues in the quarter and year-to-date periods of 1999 are somewhat lower than the 17% margins in the comparable 1998 periods. The lower margin in both periods is a result of a greater proportion of total outsourcing revenues in the 1999 periods derived from the Company's contract with Duquesne. The gross margin on the Duquesne contract is low because it was the Company's first large sale Network AMR system. Operating Expenses Total operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 1999 were approximately $2 million lower than the second quarter of 1998. Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 1999 were $3.5 million lower than the comparable six-month period in 1998, despite a $1.1 million restructuring charge in the first quarter of 1999. The restructuring charge was primarily for severance and other expenses related to the closure of the Company's Saratoga, California product development office. The development activities from this office are being consolidated into the Company's other product development locations. Without this restructuring charge, total year-to-date operating expenses were $4.6 million, or 12%, lower than the same period in 1998. <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, -------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- (in millions) Increase Increase Operating expenses 1999 (Decrease) 1998 1999 (Decrease) 1998 -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Sales and marketing $ 7.1 1% $ 6.9 13.5 (1%) $ 13.6 Product development 6.9 (23%) 9.0 13.5 (24%) 17.9 General and administrative 3.4 2% 3.3 6.4 1% 6.3 Amortization of intangibles 0.5 (17%) 0.6 1.0 (17%) 1.2 Restructuring Charge - 100% - 1.1 100% - ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Total operating expenses $17.9 (10%) $19.8 $ 35.5 (9%) $ 39.0 ========== ========== ========== =========== </TABLE> Sales and marketing expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 were approximately level with the comparable periods in 1998. Product development expenses were significantly lower in the 1999 quarter and year to date periods compared to last year. The lower expenses are primarily the result of restructuring measures the Company began to implement in the third quarter of 1998 (see restructuring charge discussed below). General and administrative expenses in 1999 were substantially level with the 1998 periods. Amortization of intangibles decreased slightly in both the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 compared to 1998, yet remained at 1% of total revenues. Amortization expenses are lower in the current period because the Company wrote off certain intangible assets in the third quarter of 1998. The Company expects that operating expenses will be lower in 1999 compared to 1998 because of the restructuring measures. Although the Company has expensed all known restructuring charges as of June 30, 1999, additional charges may be incurred in conjunction with certain strategic planning activities the Company is considering.
In the third quarter of 1998 the Company announced, and began the implementation of, restructuring measures to reduce costs and improve operating efficiencies. These measures resulted in a $3.9 million restructuring charge in 1998 and an additional restructuring charge of $1.1 million in the first quarter of 1999. The restructuring measures involved a workforce reduction - (primarily in product development), the write-off of certain intangible assets due to a reduction in the scope of planned technology development, closure of some of the Company's facilities and discontinuation of a jointly owned entity. (See Note 3 of the accompanying financial statements.) The Company's comparatively high product development spending in the prior years expanded the number of models of meter modules produced, enhanced module functionality, and expanded network capabilities and products. Because the Company now has a broad product line including commercial and industrial ("C&I") products, Mobile AMR, handheld systems, telephone modules and electric, gas and water meter modules, product development spending has been scaled back to lower levels. Interest and Other, Net <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, ------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- (in millions) Increase Increase Other income (expense) 1999 (Decrease) 1998 1999 (Decrease) 1998 ------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Equity in affiliates loss $(0.2) (37%) $(0.2) $ (0.3) (11%) $ (0.4) Net interest income (expense) (1.4) (12%) (1.7) (3.3) 12% (2.9) ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total other income (expense) $(1.6) (15%) $(1.9) $ (3.6) 10% $ (3.3) ========== ========== ========== =========== </TABLE> The Company had net interest expense of $ 1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 1999, which is comparable to net interest expense in the same periods of 1998. Net interest expense of $3.3 million in the first half of 1999 was higher than the same period in 1998, primarily due to capitalized interest, which reduces net interest expense in 1998. The Company capitalized interest related to outsourcing installations of $260,000 in the first quarter of 1998. No interest was capitalized in the second quarter of 1998 or the 1999 periods. Income Taxes The Company had an income tax benefit of approximately 30% of pre-tax earnings from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 1999 compared to a benefit of 38% for the full year 1998. The lower comparative tax rate in 1999, is primarily caused by a concentration of state tax obligations and lower expected R&D tax credits. To the extent pre-tax earnings from continuing operations, or the components of those earnings, differ from the Company's current expectations, the effective tax rate for the year could change. When the Company has a lower level of consolidated earnings, it expects its tax rate will be significantly higher than the statutory rate, primarily due to the impact of the state and foreign taxes. Extraordinary Item - Gain on Extinguishment of Debt In March 1999 the Company completed its offer ("Exchange Offer") to exchange up to $15.8 million principal amount of its 6 3/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2004 ("Exchange Notes"), for up to $22.0 million principal amount of its 6 3/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes due 2004 ("Original Notes"). The Exchange Offer was made on the basis of $720 principal amount of Exchange Notes for $1,000 principal amount of Original Notes. A total of $15.8 million aggregate principal amount of Exchange Notes was issued related to the transaction. The Company generated a pre-tax gain on extinguishment of debt, net of debt issuance expenses, of $5.6 million in the first quarter of 1999 related to the exchange. The after-tax effect of the gain on extinguishment was $3.7 million.
FINANCIAL CONDITION <TABLE> <CAPTION> Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, -------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- (in millions) Increase Increase Cash flows information 1999 (Decrease) 1998 1999 (Decrease) 1998 -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- <S> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> <C> Operating activities $ 6.9 (2%) $ 6.8 $ 12.9 * $ (0.6) Investing activities (4.5) (33%) (3.4) (7.9) 30% (11.4) Financing activities (1.4) (319%) 0.6 (4.9) (133%) 14.7 ---------- --------- ----------- ----------- Net inc. (dec.) in cash $ 1.0 (76%) $ 4.0 $ 0.1 (95%) $ 2.7 ========== ========== =========== =========== </TABLE> o not meaningful Operating activities generated approximately the same amount of cash in the second quarter of 1999 as they did in the second quarter of 1998. For the first six months of 1999 the Company generated $12.90 million in cash compared to a usage of $600,000 in cash in the first six months of 1998. The $13.6 million improvement in cash flow was primarily driven by increased collections of accounts receivable and a reduction in the Company's unbilled receivables. Unbilled receivables were higher in the 1998 period because of a high level of turnkey installations, which typically have deferred billing terms. The 1998 period also included cash used for payment of 1997 performance incentives of approximately $4 million. Investments totaled $4.5 million during the second quarter of 1999, up somewhat from the $3.4 million in the prior year's quarter due primarily to the acquisition of C&I meters for Duquesne. Investments were 30% lower in the first six months of 1999 compared to the same six months of 1998 because of a reduction in the amount of equipment needed for outsourcing installations and lower capital acquisitions for internal use. Financing activities used $1.4 million and $4.9 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 1999 compared to generating $649,000 and $14.7 million during the same periods in 1998. Financing activities in the 1999 quarter primarily consisted of paying down the Company's bank line of credit. During 1998 the Company primarily generated cash from financing activities by borrowing against the bank line of credit and obtaining project financing for an outsourcing contract. Existing sources of liquidity at June 30, 1999 include approximately $2.9 million of existing cash and cash equivalents and $20 million of available borrowings under the revolving credit facility. The Company expects to spend less in 1999 on equipment used for outsourcing installations than it did in 1998 because outsourcing installations on current contracts have been completed or are nearing completion. However, investments in equipment for outsourcing may increase in late 1999 and 2000 as the Company begins installation of a new outsourcing system for Southern California Edison. The Company expects to spend somewhat more on capital assets for internal use during 1999 than it did in 1998. The Company believes that existing cash, together with available borrowings and cash generated from operating activities, will be more than sufficient to fund operations, exclusive of any new large outsourcing arrangements, for the remainder of 1999 and into 2000. The Company intends to fund future outsourcing contracts with project financing to the extent possible. RECENT FCC ACTIONS The Company uses licensed multiple address system ("MAS") frequencies in the 928 - - 959 MHz band to interrogate or "wake-up" some of its meter modules. (See "Description of Business - FCC Regulation" and "Certain Risk Factors - Availability and Regulation of Radio Spectrum" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.) On July 1, 1999 the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making ("NPRM") that contains a clause stating that the FCC temporarily will not accept any new applications after July 3, 1999 for MAS frequencies in this band. The NPRM does not have an effect on existing licenses. Most utilities use MAS licenses for many purposes, including meter reading, mobile dispatch and supervisory control and distribution automation. In addition, other companies in the gas pipeline, railroad and petroleum industry use MAS licenses in the frequency band. Both utilities and these other businesses need to obtain new licenses to grow and broaden their business. The Company and many of these other companies are planning on filing an emergency petition with the FCC to seek relief from the moratorium on new license applications, and are aggressively lobbying the issue with appropriate Congressmen and Senators. One additional action the company is taking to minimize the impact of this moratorium on its business is to arrange for the sharing of existing licenses between customers. Although the Company believes that it will be successful in its efforts to seek relief from this NPRM, and that the matter will be favorably settled by year-end, there can be no assurance that it will be. As long as the NPRM is in effect the Company may experience delays in revenue from some customers, particularly smaller utilities and municipalities who do not currently hold or have availability to these licenses. Currently the Company estimates that approximately $5 million of revenue in the second half of 1999 could be impacted by this action. YEAR 2000 COMPLIANCE In general, the "Year 2000 problem" concerns software programs that contain only a two-digit year value (99 to 00) rather than a four-digit year value (1999 to 2000) to indicate a change from 1999 to 2000. The issue is whether computer systems and non-information technology systems, such as embedded micro-controllers, will properly recognize date sensitive information when the year changes to 2000. Systems that do not properly recognize such information could generate erroneous data or cause a system to fail. The Company instituted a Year 2000 program in 1997 to identify potential risks and to develop solutions to mitigate those risks. The Company believes that it will be successful in implementing the identified solutions in a timely manner in order to mitigate potential Year 2000 problems. The Company has potential risks related to the Year 2000 problem in three areas: 1) suppliers, 2) internally developed software and hardware the Company sells, and 3) internal software and hardware systems. The following discussion addresses each of these potential risk areas. Suppliers: The Company has received confirmation from all critical suppliers indicating their Year 2000 readiness. The majority of the critical suppliers are already Year 2000 compliant. Of those not yet fully in compliance, the vast majority indicated that they would reach full compliance by the end of July and a smaller number indicated that they would in October. The Company will pursue the issue with those suppliers who are not yet compliant to insure compliance within the time frames indicated. Internally developed software and hardware for sale to customers: The Company has completed the process of identifying which of its products available for sale to customers were not Year 2000 compliant. The Company began the process of upgrading software and hardware in late 1997 and completed all major standard applications updates by December 1998. A small number of hardware and software platforms will not be upgraded and all customers affected were notified. Alternatives, including upgrading systems, were developed for them. Substantially all of the customers with maintenance contracts with the Company have had their systems upgraded. Internal software and hardware systems: The Company upgraded its financial software including general ledger, manufacturing and sales order processing to be Year 2000 compliant during the second quarter of 1998 for domestic and Australian operations. The Company's United Kingdom operations and subsidiary in France were upgraded in the fourth quarter of 1998 and the second quarter of 1999, respectively. The Company also has a variety of other software and hardware, including personal computer software and software used in engineering functions, all of which are now Year 2000 compliant. The Company believes that the reasonably most likely worst-case scenario it might confront with respect to Year 2000 issues has to do with the possible failure of third party systems over which the Company has no control. These systems may include, but are not limited to, power and telecommunications services. The Company has purchased several generators for its headquarters in Spokane to temporarily run critical systems such as computer systems, lights and telephones if needed. Some problems, however, may remain uncorrected, and could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and operating results. The Company may also experience reduced sales of its products as potential current customers reduce their budgets for meter-reading and data management solutions because of increased expenditures on their own Year 2000 compliance efforts. The Company does not anticipate that it will incur further significant operating expenses or be required to invest heavily in computer systems improvements to be Year 2000 compliant. Total costs for the Year 2000 issue are estimated to be approximately $1.5 million, of which approximately $1.3 million has been spent to date. However, as the compliance process is not yet complete, some uncertainty exists concerning total costs associated with Year 2000 compliance. Any Year 2000 compliance problem of either the Company or its collaborative partners could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. Certain Forward-Looking Statements When included in this discussion, the words "expects," "intends," "anticipates," "plans," "projects" and "estimates," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements, are inherently subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, changes in the utility regulatory environment, pending FCC regulations, delays or difficulties in introducing new products and acceptance of those products, ability to obtain project financing in amounts necessary to fund future outsourcing agreements, increased competition and various other matters, many of which are beyond the Company's control. For a more complete description of these and other risks, see "Recent FCC Actions" section in this document and "Certain Risk Factors" and "Description of Business - FCC Regulation" included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. The Company expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained herein to reflect any change on the Company's expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based.
Part 2: Other Information Item 1: Legal Proceedings On May 29, 1997, Itron and its Chairman, Johnny M. Humphreys, were served with a complaint alleging securities fraud filed by Mark G. Epstein (Epstein vs Itron, etal) on his own behalf and alleged to be on behalf of a class of all similarly situated, in the US District Court of Easter Washington (Civil Action) The complaint alleged, among other matters, that Itron and Mr. Humphreys violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder by making allegedly false statements regarding the development status, performance and technological capabilities of Itron's Fixed Network AMR system and regarding the suitability of Itron's encoder receiver transmitter devices for use with an advanced Fixed Network AMR system. The complaint sought monetary damages, costs and attorneys' fees and unspecified equitable or injunctive relief. On March 10, 1999, the Court certified this action as a class action on behalf of all purchasers of Itron Common Stock between September 11, 1995 and October 22, 1996 except for the Defendants and persons or entities having a relationship with the Defendants. On June 3, 1999 Itron, Inc. reached an agreement to settle the lawsuit by a payment to the plaintiff class of $12 million, all of which will be funded by insurance proceeds. The settlement is subject to certain customary conditions, including notice to the potential class members and approval by the court. Neither the Company, nor Johnny Humphreys, Itron's Chairman who was also named in the lawsuit, have admitted any wrongdoing or any liability and none has been found by the court. Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders The Company held its annual meeting of shareholders on May 5, 1999. Three directors were elected for three year terms at the meeting, Ted C. DeMerritt, Jon E. Eliassen and Stuart Ed White. Johnny M. Humphreys, Mary Ann Peters, Michael B. Bracy, Graham M. Wilson and Paul A. Redmond continued their terms as Directors. The following summarizes all matters voted on at the meeting: <TABLE> <CAPTION> Matter 1. Election of Directors: Nominee In Favor Withheld -------------------------------------- -------------------------- -------------------------- <S> <C> <C> Ted C. DeMerritt 12,421,301 145,380 Jon E. Eliassen 12,422,364 144,317 Stuart Edward White 12,416,773 149,908 </TABLE> <TABLE> <CAPTION> Matter 2. Amendment of the Company's 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan: For Against Abstain Broker Non-Votes ------------------------------- ----------------- ---------------- ------------------------ <S> <C> <C> <C> 11,555,746 943,312 67,623 - </TABLE> <TABLE> <CAPTION> Matter 3. Ratify Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditors: For Against Abstain Broker Non-Votes -------------------------------- ----------------- ---------------- ------------------------ <S> <C> <C> <C> 12,506,568 40,907 19,206 - </TABLE>
Item 6: Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K a) Exhibits Exhibit 10.17 - Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Michael J.Chesser dated May 17,1999 Exhibit 27 - Financial Data Schedule b) Reports on Form 8-K A report on Form 8-K, dated June 30, 1999 was filed on July 1, 1999, pursuant to Item 5 of that form. The report related to an amendment to a contract with Virginia Power that resulted in a $4.2 million reduction in the price paid by Virginia for an AMR system.
SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Commission Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. ITRON, INC. (Registrant) By: /s/ DAVID G. REMINGTON David G. Remington Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) Date: August 13, 1999