Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes þ No ¨
The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock is 132,920,243 shares, net of treasury stock as of October 27, 2005.
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1
Financial Statements:
Condensed Consolidated Balance SheetsSeptember 30, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)Nine and three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited)Nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)Nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 2
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of FinancialCondition and Results of Operations
Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 4
Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 6
Exhibits
2
Item 1. Financial Statements
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
4
(continued)
5
6
7
8
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings and its majority-owned subsidiaries over which it exercises control. Long-term investments in affiliated companies in which the Company owns greater than 20%, and therefore exercises significant influence, but which it does not control, are accounted for using the equity method. Investments in which the Company does not exercise significant influence (generally, when the Company has an investment of less than 20% and no representation on the Company’s Board of Directors) are accounted for using the cost method. All significant inter-company transactions and accounts have been eliminated. The Company does not have any variable interest entities or special purpose entities whose financial results are not included in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
The financial statements of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local currency as the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates as of the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average monthly exchange rates prevailing during the period. Resulting translation adjustments are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive earnings”.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements have been included. Except as otherwise disclosed, all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles.
The financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not contain certain information included in the Company’s 2004 annual report on Form 10-K. Therefore, the interim statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s annual report.
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings including the impact of dilutive adjustments by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus potentially dilutive shares, as if they had been issued at the beginning of the period presented. Potentially dilutive common shares result primarily from the Company’s outstanding stock options, restricted stock awards, performance share awards, and shares issuable upon conversion of zero-coupon subordinated notes.
The following represents a reconciliation of basic earnings per share to diluted earnings per share:
(shares in millions)
9
The following table summarizes the potential common shares not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their impact would have been antidilutive:
The Company applies the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 in accounting for its employee stock option and stock purchase plans and, accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for these plans in the financial statements. Had the Company determined compensation cost for these two plans based on the fair value method as defined in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” as amended by SFAS No. 148, the impact on the Company’s net earnings on a pro forma basis is indicated below:
On October 20, 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which the Company could purchase up to an aggregate of $250.0 of its common stock from time-to-time. During the first six months of 2005, the Company completed this program by purchasing 2.5 million shares of its common stock totaling $122.2 with cash flow from operations.
On April 21, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program under which the Company may purchase up to an aggregate of $250.0 of its common stock from time-to-time. The Company began purchasing shares under this program in the third quarter. For the three months ended September 30, 2005, the Company purchased 1.6 million shares of its common stock totaling $78.7 with cash flow from operations.
10
On January 13, 2005, the Company entered into a $350.0 revolving credit facility with Credit Suisse First Boston and UBS Securities LLC, acting as Co-Lead Arrangers, and a group of financial institutions. This new five year credit facility replaced the existing $150.0 364-day revolving credit facility and the $200.0 three-year revolving credit facility which was amended on January 14, 2003 and was scheduled to expire on February 18, 2005. These credit agreements, under which no loans were outstanding, were terminated upon the closing of the new credit facility. The new facility also provides for an accordion feature whereby the Company can increase the amounts available under the facility up to an additional $150.0, with the consent of the lenders, if needed to support the Company’s growth. The revolving credit facility bears interest at varying rates based upon the Company’s credit rating with Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services. There were no balances outstanding on the Company’s revolving credit facility at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. As of September 30, 2005, the weighted average interest rate on the revolving credit facility was 4.34%.
The senior credit facility is available for general corporate purposes, including working capital, capital expenditures, funding of share repurchases and other payments, and acquisitions. The agreement contains certain debt covenants which require that the Company maintain leverage and interest coverage ratios of 2.5 to 1.0 and 5.0 to 1.0, respectively. Both ratios are calculated in relation to EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization). The covenants also restrict the payment of dividends. The Company is in compliance with all covenants at September 30, 2005.
Interest rate swap agreements, which have been used by the Company from time to time in the management of interest rate exposure, are accounted for at fair value. Amounts to be paid or received under such agreements are recognized as interest income or expense in the periods in which they accrue.
The Company’s zero coupon-subordinated notes contain the following two features that are considered to be embedded derivative instruments under SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”:
Based upon independent appraisals, these embedded derivatives had no fair market value at September 30, 2005 and 2004.
On February 3, 2005, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of US Pathology Labs, Inc. and Subsidiaries (“US LABS”) for approximately $155 in cash. US LABS, based in Irvine, California, is a national, anatomic pathology reference laboratory devoted to comprehensive, high-quality, rapid-response cancer testing. The company provides diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive cancer testing services to hospitals, physician offices and surgery centers.
On May 11, 2005, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Esoterix, Inc. and Subsidiaries (“Esoterix”) for approximately $150 in cash. Esoterix, based in Austin, Texas, is a leading provider of specialty reference testing.
11
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill (net of accumulated amortization) for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005 and for the year ended December 31, 2004 are as follows:
The components of identifiable intangible assets are as follows:
Amortization of intangible assets for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 was $13.1 and $38.3, respectively, and $10.9 and $31.7 for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2004. Amortization expense for the net carrying amount of intangible assets is estimated to be $13.3 for the remainder of fiscal 2005, $51.8 in fiscal 2006, $50.0 in fiscal 2007, $47.4 in fiscal 2008, $46.4 in fiscal 2009 and $451.2 thereafter.
During the third quarter of 2005, the Company began to implement its plan related to the integration of Esoterix and US LABS operations into the Company’s service delivery network. The plan is directed at reducing redundant facilities, while maintaining the goal of providing excellent customer service.
In connection with the integration plan, the Company recorded $8.8 of costs associated with the execution of the plan. The majority of these integration costs related to employee severance and contractual obligations associated with leased facilities and equipment. Of this amount, $7.0 related to employee severance benefits for approximately 500 employees, with the remainder primarily related to contractual obligations associated with leased facilities. Employee groups being affected as a result of this plan include those involved in the collection and testing of specimens, as well as administrative and other support functions.
The Company also recorded a special charge of $1.2 related to forgiveness of amounts owed by patients and clients in the areas of the Gulf Coast severely impacted by hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
12
The following represents the Company’s restructuring activities for the period indicated:
In December 2004, the Financial Standards Accounting Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment (revised 2004).” This Statement is a revision of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” This Statement supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and its related implementation guidance. SFAS 123(R) is effective for annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. This Statement establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This Statement focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. This Statement does not change the accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees provided in SFAS 123 as originally issued and EITF Issue No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services.” This Statement does not address the accounting for employee share ownership plans, which are subject to AICPA Statement of Position 93-6, “Employers’ Accounting for Employee Stock Ownership Plans”. The Company has not finalized what, if any, changes may be made to its equity compensation plans in light of the accounting change, and therefore is not yet in a position to quantify its impact. The Company expects to announce the impact in connection with reporting its fourth quarter and full year 2005 financial results. The impact on cash from operations of adopting the new accounting standard cannot be estimated at this time. See Note 3 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the proforma impact of expensing all equity-based compensation, which the Company believes would approximate the annual effect of adopting the new accounting standard.
On June 24, 2003, the Company and certain of its executive officers were sued in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina in the first of a series of putative shareholder class actions alleging securities fraud. Shortly thereafter, five other complaints containing substantially identical allegations were filed against the Company and certain of the Company’s executive officers. Each of the complaints alleges that the defendants violated the federal securities laws by making material misstatements and/or omissions that caused the price of the Company’s stock to be artificially inflated between February 13 and October 3, 2002. The plaintiffs seek certification of a class of substantially all persons who purchased shares of the Company’s stock during that time period and unspecified monetary damages. These six cases have been consolidated and will proceed as a single case. The plaintiffs have filed a
13
consolidated amended complaint. On July 16, 2004, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the consolidated complaint. The defendants deny any liability and continue to defend the case vigorously. At this time, it is premature to make any assessment of the potential outcome of the cases or whether they could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition.
The Company is the appellant in a patent case originally filed by Competitive Technologies, Inc. and Metabolite Laboratories, Inc. in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. After a jury trial, the district court entered judgment against the Company for patent infringement, with total damages and attorney’s fees payable by the Company of approximately $7.8 million. The underlying judgment has been paid. The Company vigorously contested the judgment and appealed the case to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On June 8, 2004, that court affirmed the judgment against the Company and, on August 5, 2004, the Company’s request for rehearing was denied. On November 3, 2004, the Company filed a petition for a writ of certiorariwith the United States Supreme Court. On October 31, 2005, the Court granted the Company's petition, and the Company anticipates the case to be argued before the Supreme Court by the end of April 2006.
The Company is also involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. These matters include, but are not limited to, intellectual property disputes, professional liability, employee related matters, and inquiries from governmental agencies and Medicare or Medicaid payers and managed care payers requesting comment on allegations of billing irregularities that are brought to their attention through billing audits or third parties. In the opinion of management, based upon the advice of counsel and consideration of all facts available at this time, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company. The Company is also named from time to time in suits brought under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. These suits typically allege that the Company has made false statements and/or certifications in connection with claims for payment from federal health care programs. They may remain under seal (hence, unknown to the Company) for some time while the government decides whether to intervene on behalf of the qui tam plaintiff. Such claims are an inevitable part of doing business in the health care field today and, in the opinion of management, based upon the advice of counsel and consideration of all facts available at this time, the ultimate disposition of those qui tam matters presently known to the Company is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
The Company believes that it is in compliance in all material respects with all statutes, regulations and other requirements applicable to its clinical laboratory operations. The clinical laboratory testing industry is, however, subject to extensive regulation, and the courts have not interpreted many of these statutes and regulations. There can be no assurance therefore that those applicable statutes and regulations might not be interpreted or applied by a prosecutorial, regulatory or judicial authority in a manner that would adversely affect the Company. Potential sanctions for violation of these statutes and regulations include significant fines and the loss of various licenses, certificates and authorizations.
Under the Company’s present insurance programs, coverage is obtained for catastrophic exposures as well as those risks required to be insured by law or contract. The Company is responsible for the uninsured portion of losses related primarily to general, professional and vehicle liability, certain medical costs and workers’ compensation. The self-insured retentions are on a per occurrence basis without any aggregate annual limit. Provisions for losses expected under these programs are recorded based upon the Company’s estimates of the aggregated liability of claims incurred. At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the Company had provided letters of credit aggregating approximately $60.6 and $63.5 respectively, primarily in connection with certain insurance programs.
14
Substantially all employees of the Company are covered by a defined benefit retirement plan (the “Company Plan”). The benefits to be paid under the Company Plan are based on years of credited service and average final compensation. The Company’s policy is to fund the Company Plan with at least the minimum amount required by applicable regulations.
The Company has a second defined benefit plan which covers its senior management group that provides for the payment of the difference, if any, between the amount of any maximum limitation on annual benefit payments under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the annual benefit that would be payable under the Company Plan but for such limitation. This plan is an unfunded plan.
The components of net periodic pension cost for both of the defined benefit plans are summarized as follows:
The Company assumed obligations under a subsidiary’s postretirement medical plan. Coverage under this plan is restricted to a limited number of existing employees of the subsidiary. This plan is unfunded and the Company’s policy is to fund benefits as claims are incurred. The components of postretirement benefit expense are as follows:
The Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 was signed into law on December 8, 2003. The Act introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare Part D) which will begin in 2006. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings has concluded that its post-retirement health care plan provides prescription drug benefits that will qualify for the federal subsidy provided by the Act.
As of September 30, 2005, the Company has contributed $8.0 to its defined pension plan, and based on the funded status of the plan, does not anticipate making any further contributions in 2005.
15
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company has made in this report, and from time to time may otherwise make in its public filings, press releases and discussions by Company management, forward-looking statements concerning the Company’s operations, performance and financial condition, as well as its strategic objectives. Some of these forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “believes”, “expects”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “seeks”, “approximately”, “intends”, “plans”, “estimates”, or “anticipates” or the negative of those words or other comparable terminology. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and the Company claims the protection afforded by the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those currently anticipated due to a number of factors in addition to those discussed elsewhere herein and in the Company’s other public filings, press releases and discussions with Company management, including:
16
17
Operating results for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 were negatively impacted by Gulf Coast hurricanes Katrina and Rita. While the Company’s more significant testing facilities were not damaged by either storm, a number of smaller facilities, including several patient service centers, continue to be inoperable. The Company has made every effort to re-route specimens to other operating facilities; however, specimen volume has been negatively impacted due to patients’ inability to visit doctors’ offices – the source of the majority of testing volume. In a typical hurricane event, the Company experiences a significant drop in specimen volumes during the storm — returning to normal several days after the storm has passed and services are restored. Due to the significant impact of these storms on southern Mississippi and New Orleans, the Company expects the impact will last longer than normal. The Company anticipates that certain facilities in southern Mississippi and New Orleans will remain closed for the rest of 2005.
Management estimates that revenue was negatively impacted by approximately $7.0, or 1% during the third quarter due to severe weather. The Company estimates that fourth quarter revenues will be negatively impacted by approximately $7.5 and volume will be negatively impacted by approximately 1%.
Three months ended September 30, 2005 compared with Three months ended September 30, 2004
Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2005 were $852.9, an increase of $71.4, or approximately 9.1%, from $781.5 for the comparable 2004 period. The sales increase is a result of an increase of approximately 2.1% in volume (primarily volume growth in genomic and esoteric testing of 11.2% which was positively impacted by the acquisitions of US LABS and Esoterix) and 7.0% in price. The improvement in pricing is a result of several factors, including our emphasis on pricing discipline, a continued shift in the Company’s test mix in core, genomic and esoteric testing, and the loss of a large hospital laboratory management agreement. Additionally, the acquisition of both US LABS and Esoterix positively impacted price.
Cost of sales, which includes primarily laboratory and distribution costs, was $498.3 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared to $455.6 in the corresponding 2004 period, an increase of $42.7, or 9.4%. The increase in cost of sales is primarily the result of increased volume in genomic and esoteric testing and the acquisitions discussed above. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was 58.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 58.3% in the corresponding 2004 period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $179.9 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 from $162.2 in the same period in 2004. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were 21.1% and 20.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. This increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales is primarily the result of the investment in the sales force and the impact of acquisitions, offset by a reduced effective bad debt expense rate and the continued impact of the Company’s cost control initiatives.
The amortization of intangibles and other assets was $13.1 and $10.9 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004. The increase in the amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2005 is a result of business acquisitions.
During the three months ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded restructuring and other special charges of $10.0, in connection with the integration of US LABS and Esoterix as well as losses realized as a result of Hurricane Katrina. The $10.0 was comprised of approximately $8.8 related to integration costs of actions that impact the Company’s existing employees and operations (see “Note 9 to the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements”) and a special charge of approximately $1.2 related to forgiveness of amounts owed by patients and clients in the areas of the Gulf Coast severely impacted by hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
18
Interest expense was $8.4 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared with $9.0 for the same period in 2004. The decrease in interest expense is primarily the result of the completion of amortization of deferred fees associated with the zero coupon-subordinated notes in 2004.
Income from investments in joint venture partnerships was $13.8 for the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared with $12.9 for the same period in 2004. This income represents the Company’s ownership share in joint venture partnerships. A significant portion of this income is derived from investments in Ontario and Alberta, Canada, and is earned in Canadian dollars.
The provision for income taxes as a percentage of earnings before taxes was 39.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared to 41.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2004. The effective tax rate was favorably impacted by a deduction for certain dividends received in 2005.
Nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared with Nine months ended September 30, 2004.
Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were $2,505.3, an increase of $187.0, or 8.1%, from $2,318.3 for the same period in 2004. The sales increase is a result of an increase of approximately 1.2% in volume (primarily volume growth in genomic and esoteric testing of 9.8% which was positively impacted by the acquisitions of US LABS and Esoterix) and 6.9% in price. The improvement in pricing is a result of several factors, including our emphasis on pricing discipline, a continued shift in the Company’s test mix in core, genomic and esoteric testing, and the loss of a large capitated contract in Florida and a large hospital laboratory management agreement. Additionally, the acquisition of both US LABS and Esoterix positively impacted price.
Cost of sales, which includes primarily laboratory and distribution costs, was $1,447.5 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to $1,335.2 for the same period of 2004, an increase of $112.3, or 8.4%. The increase in cost of sales is primarily the result of increased volume in genomic and esoteric testing and the acquisitions discussed above. Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales was 57.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 57.6% for the same period in 2004.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $527.2 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 from $490.2 for the same period in 2004. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were 21.0% and 21.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. This decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales is primarily the result of a reduced effective bad debt expense rate and the continued impact of the Company’s cost control initiatives, offset by the investment in the sales force and the impact of acquisitions.
The amortization of intangibles and other assets was $38.3 and $31.7 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004. The increase in the amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 is a result of business acquisitions.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, the Company recorded restructuring and other special charges of $10.0, in connection with the integration of US LABS and Esoterix as well as losses realized as a result of Hurricane Katrina. The $10.0 was comprised of approximately $8.8 related to integration costs of actions that impact the Company’s existing employees and operations (see “Note 9 to the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements”) and a special charge of approximately $1.2 related to forgiveness of amounts owed by patients and clients in the areas of the Gulf Coast severely impacted by hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
The investment loss of $3.1 recorded in the second quarter of 2005, relates to a write-off of the value of warrants to purchase common stock of Exact Sciences Corporation (“Exact”), which were obtained as part of the Company’s licensing agreement for Exact’s PreGen Plus technology in 2002. The original term of the warrants expired in June 2005.
19
Interest expense was $25.5 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared with $27.6 for the same period in 2004. The decrease in interest expense is primarily the result of the completion of amortization of deferred fees associated with the zero coupon-subordinated notes in 2004.
The provision for income taxes as a percentage of earnings before taxes was 40.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to 41.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. The effective tax rate was favorably impacted by a deduction for certain dividends received in 2005.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $413.0 and $431.5 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004, respectively. The decrease in cash flows from operations primarily resulted from an increase in income tax payments of $93.9 made in the first nine months of 2005.
Capital expenditures were $71.4 and $59.1 at September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company expects total capital expenditures of approximately $90.0 to $100.0 in 2005. These expenditures are intended to support the Company’s strategic initiatives centered around customer retention, scientific differentiation and managed care. In addition, the Company continues to make important investments in information technology connectivity with its customers and financial systems. Such expenditures are expected to be funded by cash flow from operations.
On April 21, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program under which the Company may purchase up to an aggregate of $250.0 of its common stock from time-to-time. The Company began purchasing shares under this program in the third quarter. For the three months ended September 30, 2005, the Company purchased approximately 1.6 million shares of its common stock totaling $78.7 with cash flow from operations.
Based on current and projected levels of operations, coupled with availability under its revolving credit facilities, the Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet both its short-term and long-term cash needs.
Contractual Cash Obligations (in millions)
20
The Company addresses its exposure to market risks, principally the market risk associated with changes in interest rates, through a controlled program of risk management that has included in the past, the use of derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swap agreements. Although, as set forth below, the Company’s zero coupon-subordinated notes contain features that are considered to be embedded derivative instruments, the Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. The Company does not believe that its exposure to market risk is material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
The Company’s zero coupon-subordinated notes contain the following two features that are considered to be embedded derivative instruments under SFAS No. 133:
Based upon independent appraisals, these embedded derivatives had no fair value at September 30, 2005.
As of the end of the period covered by the Form 10-Q, the Company carried out, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, 2005.
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
21
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On October 20, 2004, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program under which the Company may purchase up to an aggregate of $250.0 of its common stock from time-to-time. During the first six months of 2005, the Company completed this program by purchasing 2.5 million shares of its common stock totaling $122.2 with cash flow from operations.
On April 21, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program under which the Company may purchase up to an aggregate of $250.0 of its common stock from time-to-time.
(Shares and dollars in millions)
Item 4.
None
Item 6.
(a)
31.1*
- Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
31.2*
- Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
32*
- Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)
* filed herewith
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
Registrant
By: /s/ THOMAS P. MAC MAHON
Thomas P. Mac Mahon
Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer
By: /s/ WILLIAM B. HAYES
William B. Hayes
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
October 31, 2005
23