Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 001-39537
Laird Superfood, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Nevada
81-1589788
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
5303 Spine Road, Suite 204, Boulder, Colorado, 80301
(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (541) 588-3600
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock
LSF
NYSE American
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
☐
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
☒
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of a share of the registrant’s common stock on June 30, 2025 as reported by the NYSE American on such date, was approximately $52.0 million.
As of March 23, 2026 the registrant had 10,925,218 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
None.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
On March 12, 2026 (the “Closing Date”), we completed the acquisition of Navitas LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Navitas”), pursuant to that certain securities purchase agreement, dated December 21, 2025 (the “Acquisition Agreement”) by and among the Company, Encore Consumer Capital Fund II, LP (“Encore”), The Ira and Joanna Haber Family Trust, Dated October 5, 2015 (the “Haber Family Trust”), and Advantage Capital Agribusiness Partners, L.P. (“Advantage Capital,” together with Encore and the Haber Family Trust, the “Sellers”). Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, following the receipt of approval from our stockholders, we acquired (i) all of the issued and outstanding units of Navitas from the Sellers and (ii) all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Global Superfoods Corp. (“GSC”), from Encore for a purchase price of $38.5 million in cash, subject to customary purchase price adjustments, including a working capital adjustment (the “Navitas Acquisition”). GSC is a holding company with no operations whose purpose is to hold units of Navitas.
On the Closing Date and concurrently with the closing of the Navitas Acquisition, we completed the transactions contemplated by that certain investment agreement, dated December 21, 2025 (the “Investment Agreement”), entered into by and among the Company, Gateway Superfood NSSIII Investment, LLC (“Gateway III”), and Gateway Superfood NSSIV Investment, LLC (“Gateway IV” and together with Gateway III, the “Investor”), with the Investor being an affiliate of Nexus Capital Management LP (“Nexus”), pursuant to which the Investor purchased an aggregate of 50,000 initial shares (the “Initial Shares”) of Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) at a purchase price of $1,000 per share for gross proceeds of $50.0 million at closing (the “Nexus Investment” and together with the Navitas Acquisition, the “Transactions”). The net proceeds from the Nexus Investment were subsequently used to complete the Navitas Acquisition.
The audited financial statements included herein as well as “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” relate to the Company prior to the consummation of the Transactions, other than where expressly provided therein. The remaining sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 (this “Annual Report”), other than where expressly provided therein, relate to the Company following the Transactions.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Part I
Item 1. Business
4
Item 1A. Risk Factors
14
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
36
Item 2. Properties
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
37
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6. [Reserved]
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
38
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
46
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
47
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
76
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
77
Item 11. Executive Compensation
81
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
88
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
89
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
90
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
91
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
93
Signatures
94
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements convey our current expectations or forecasts of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and the Company’s actual results may differ significantly from the expectations discussed in forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “continues,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “future,” “intends,” “may,” “predicts,” “potential,” “plans,” “should,” “seeks,” “will,” or similar terms.
Key factors that could cause actual results to be different than expected or anticipated include, but are not limited to:
In light of these risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, you are cautioned not to place reliance on forward-looking statements, which are inherently unreliable and speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K. You are advised to read this Form 10-K and the documents that we reference in this report with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and achievements may be materially different from what we expect. When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the cautionary statements in this report. We qualify all our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. We are not under any obligation, and we expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.
INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA
This Form 10-K includes market data and other statistical information obtained from third-party industry publications, research, surveys, and studies, none of which we commissioned. Third-party industry publications, research, surveys, and studies generally indicate that their information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. However, while we are not aware of any misstatements regarding the information from these sources, we have not independently verified this information, and we cannot assure you that this information is accurate or complete. Assumptions and estimates of our industry’s future performance are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, some of which are described under Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Form 10-K, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such information.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms “Laird Superfood,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to Laird Superfood, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Picky Bars, LLC, on a consolidated basis.
Overview
Laird Superfood develops and markets great-tasting, high-quality food and beverage products designed to support health, convenience, and everyday use. Our product portfolio emphasizes natural ingredients, nutrient density, and functional attributes, and includes offerings that incorporate adaptogens and other functional ingredients commonly associated with supporting stress management, energy, mental focus, and overall wellness. Our primary products include: (i) coffee creamers, (ii) coffee, tea, and hot chocolate products, (iii) hydration and beverage enhancing products, and (iv) snacks and other food items. Following the Navitas Acquisition, our products also include healthy baking products, wellness staples, and functional snacks. Over the long term, we seek to build a widely recognized superfood brand grounded in authenticity, functionality, and a commitment to supporting a healthy and sustainable future for consumers and the environment.
Market Opportunity
Consumer preferences within the evolving food and beverage industry continue to shift away from processed and sugar-laden food and beverage products, as well as those containing significant amounts of ultra-processed and artificial ingredients. We strive to create products that are amongst the cleanest, most minimally processed in the industry, and we intend to lead by example as the tides continue to shift in our direction.
We participate in what Grand View Research estimates to be an $11.9 trillion grocery market as of 2023, with a projected 3.2% compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) between 2024 and 2030. Laird Superfood is specifically focused on the U.S. Natural, Organic, and Functional Food and Beverages and Supplement sub-segment, which accounted for approximately $104.7 billion of that market in 2023 and is expected to grow at a 13.2% CAGR between 2024 and 2030.
Additionally, per Grand View Research, the North American Functional Mushroom Supplement Market was valued at $5.5 million in 2023 and projected to grow at a 12% compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) between 2024 and 2030. Functional mushrooms are a key ingredient in the Laird Superfood portfolio as we strive to bring their potential benefits to food.
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe the following strengths differentiate Laird Superfood and create long-term, sustainable advantages:
An Emerging Platform Within the Rapidly Expanding Natural Foods Industry
Long-term opportunities lie in building Laird Superfood into a unique platform within the natural foods industry, which is currently dominated by single-product companies. The core tenets of this platform approach are strengthening our authentic and trusted brand name, growing our expansive omnichannel distribution strategy, optimizing our business model to maximize profit margins, and the introduction of new products that align with our core ethos. We believe our platform provides opportunities for continual expansion of our total addressable market (“TAM”) to allow long-duration growth, sustained differentiation of our brand, product diversification and leveraging our core strengths and operating costs to increase profit margins. As a result of Navitas Acquisition, we have expanded our platform and product offerings to include healthy baking products, wellness staples and additional snack products. In the future, we will continue to evaluate additional strategic transactions in the premium functional food market.
Omnichannel Distribution Strategy
Our omnichannel distribution strategy has two key components: e-commerce and wholesale. In the aggregate, this omnichannel strategy provides us with a diverse set of customers and wholesale partners, leading to a larger TAM opportunity than is normally available to products available primarily in grocery stores, along with an opportunity to develop a direct relationship with our customers on lairdsuperfood.com. We believe that, along with a trusted brand name, extensive proprietary distribution is a critical long-term and sustainable barrier to entry in the food industry.
Our Growth Strategy
Our primary growth strategies are as follows:
Open-Ended and Long Duration Growth in the U.S. Grocery Market
The U.S. grocery market is one of the largest retail markets in the world. Laird Superfood’s strategy is to maximize penetration of this opportunity through a variety of avenues, including growing brand trust and recognition, significantly expanding our retail distribution footprint, driving shelf velocity through an acceleration of online and offline advertising and introducing new products to expand our store footprint.
Exposure to Functional and Natural Foods Portions of Grocery Market
Within the grocery category, there is an ongoing shift from highly processed conventional brands that demonstrate little nutritional benefit, to natural, nutrient-dense, functional, and cleaner alternatives. We expect the shift in consumer tastes driving the growth of natural alternatives will continue throughout the foreseeable future as consumers become better educated on nutrition and focus on their own health and wellness, that of their families, and the environment. An increasing number of natural products are moving beyond the natural and specialty stores and into conventional grocery stores. The continuation of these trends should benefit Laird Superfood as we seek to penetrate the overall grocery market.
Repeat and Recurring Revenues
Because the consumption of coffee, creamers, greens, and hydration products is a daily habit for many consumers, there is a natural and frequent repeat usage of Laird Superfood products among large portions of our customer base. For this reason, Laird Superfood has historically experienced a meaningful base of recurring revenues due to repeat orders by its consumers and wholesale partners. Growing this base of recurring revenues is a strong focus of Laird Superfood as it evaluates new product development opportunities, and marketing strategies.
Continued Expansion of Distribution Footprint
Currently, our products are marketed and sold through a diverse set of e-commerce and wholesale channels, including grocery chains, club stores, specialty and natural food outlets, lairdsuperfood.com, pickybars.com, and Amazon.com (“Amazon”). Maximizing potential distribution in stores and attracting new consumers online will be key growth drivers for Laird Superfood. A large opportunity also exists in out-of-home venues, including health club chains, hotels, airports, universities, among others, and we are accelerating the pursuit of distribution in these incremental outlets. Our goal is to make our products available wherever our customers choose to shop.
New Product Development
We are focused on creating products that conform to our uncompromising brand ethos of great taste, high-quality ingredients, nutritional density, and functionality. Additional criteria for new product development include the potential for broad commercial acceptance, size of market opportunity, regulatory compliance issues, availability and cost of raw materials, shelf-life and expected usage patterns by potential customers. Broadening our product line will also serve to diversify our revenue base and reduce exposure to potential competitive intensity in any one category.
Targeting Top-Tier Food Industry Gross Margins
Strong gross margins will provide Laird Superfood with a sustainable competitive advantage, as these gross profit dollars can be used to invest in growth initiatives to further differentiate our brand and expand our revenue opportunity as we move toward profitability.
Focus on Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Best Practices
Our founders strongly believe we should seek to drive value for all relevant stakeholders, including customers, employees, community, shareholders, and the broader environment. This philosophy of “Ohana” is particularly important to our founders, Laird Hamilton and Gabrielle Reece, and permeates through our culture. Laird Superfood is conscientious in its sourcing of raw materials, the carbon-benefits of facilitating natural alternatives, the impact of our operations on the environment and our community and providing products that discourage the culture of single-use plastics.
Our Products
Our goal is to bring our clean, functional, and sustainability-conscious products into our customers’ daily lives, formulated with the goal of providing sustained energy and nutrition throughout the day. As part of our focus on these goals, our primary products include: (i) coffee creamers, (ii) coffee, tea, and hot chocolate products, (iii) hydration and beverage enhancing products, and (iv) snacks and other food items. Following the Navitas Acquisition, our products now also include healthy baking products, wellness staples, and functional snacks.
Our creamers include sales of powdered and liquid coffee creamers. Coffee, tea, and hot chocolate products include traditional and functional mushroom-ground and whole-bean coffee, our instant latte and protein coffee lines of just-add-water coffee and tea products, and hot chocolate with functional mushrooms. Our hydration and beverage enhancing products include sales of “Hydrate” coconut waters and our supplement lines. Snacks and other food items primarily include protein and energy bars, and other functional foods. In the third quarter of 2025, we decided that we will be discontinuing the Picky Bars brand in the second quarter of 2026, in order to re-deploy our monetary and human capital into growing the Laird Superfood brand. Our healthy baking products include as fairtrade cacao powders, nibs and wafers formulated to elevate at‑home baking with clean ingredients. Wellness staples include superfoods used daily in smoothies, bowls and meal preparation, including chia seeds, matcha powder, and acai powder. Other products include primarily coffee tools and other miscellaneous branded goods.
We view our primary competition as the legacy products, which are typically refined-sugar laden, highly processed, and have indecipherable ingredient lists. We believe that consumers want more transparency and understanding of what they are putting in their bodies and are seeking cleaner alternatives. We are driving those trends through a trusted, authentic brand platform.
Our gross sales by product category are reflected below:
Year Ended December 31,
2025
2024
$
% of Total
Coffee creamers
Coffee, tea, and hot chocolate products
Hydration and beverage enhancing products
Snacks and other food items
Other
Gross sales
Shipping income
Discounts and promotional activity
Sales, net
Coffee Creamers
We sell powdered and liquid coffee creamers. We expect to continue expanding our coffee creamer selection with additional flavors, functional ingredients, and formulations based on consumer preferences and demand. Such products historically experienced repeat usage and customer lifetime value characteristics.
We believe our creamers are differentiated from competing products due to their superior taste profile, our rigorous ingredient standards, our focus on whole ingredients, and a differentiated energy profile due to the inclusion of plant-based fats and mushrooms, where applicable. In addition to being coffee additives, our powdered creamers are used by consumers in a variety of different applications, such as smoothies and baked goods. Our liquid creamers feature an organic, plant-based formulation that incorporates functional mushroom extracts and is produced with a clean-label approach, including no gums, artificial flavors, or seed oils. Our powdered creamers have the additional appeal of shelf stability and provide our customers with on-the-go convenience.
Mordor Intelligence estimated that the U.S. creamer market was $7.1 billion in 2025 and expects it to grow at a 6.8% CAGR through 2030. This market includes products offered by Danone SA, TreeHouse Foods Inc., Nestle SA, and Dean Foods Co, among others.
Powdered Coffee Creamers
Our coffee creamers originated in powdered form for convenience, sustainability, and to maximize nutritional benefits. Our powdered coffee creamers typically have 18 to 24-month shelf lives. Powdered coffee creamers have historically represented a smaller, lower-price-point segment of the coffee creamer market with a focus purely on convenience and price. We believe that the great taste and recognizable ingredients of our powdered coffee creamers, and utilization of functional ingredients such as mushrooms that support the body and mind, are expanding the segment and attracting new consumers.
Liquid Coffee Creamers
Our liquid coffee creamers were developed internally using naturally sourced, functional ingredients. They feature an organic, plant-based formulation that incorporates functional mushroom extracts and is produced with a clean-label approach, including no gums, artificial flavors, or seed oils. The liquid format allows these products to be offered in perimeter refrigerated shelf space, where consumers are familiar with liquid creamer options. While the liquid coffee creamer category is well established, we believe innovation focused on cleaner formulations and functional ingredients has been limited due to differences in bases, flavor profiles, and sugar content across existing products. We seek to differentiate our liquid creamers by incorporating functional ingredients, such as functional mushrooms, within this category.
Coffee, Tea, and Hot Chocolate Products
Instant Latte, Protein Coffee, and Hot Chocolate with Functional Mushrooms
We sell instant beverage products that are pre-mixed with our superfood creamer and functional mushrooms, including just-add-hot-water Instant Latte and Hot Chocolate offerings. These products compete within the broader instant coffee and hot chocolate categories, which emphasize convenience and ease of preparation. Demand for our Instant Latte products has continued to grow as younger consumers increasingly seek convenient formats while also valuing quality and taste. Our Hot Chocolate products are made with coconut sugar rather than more highly refined sugars and include functional mushrooms, which we believe differentiates them from many conventional hot chocolate offerings.
In addition, we have recently expanded our innovation pipeline with the launch of a protein coffee product designed to be consumed cold, which incorporates functional mushrooms, provides 10 grams of protein per serving from whey and milk protein, and contains zero grams of sugar per serving. This product format is intended to appeal to younger consumers and those seeking higher-protein, lower-sugar beverage options.
The annual revenue generated in 2025 from the U.S. instant coffee market was approximately $859.3 million according to Mordor Intelligence.
Whole Bean, and Functional Ground and K-Cup Coffees
Our line of high-quality Peruvian organic roasts includes both traditional and functional mushroom coffee blends, which incorporate functional mushroom extracts, superfoods, and other botanical adaptogens. We believe that these products have intuitive and natural synergies for many consumers of our superfood creamer products, and the convenience of combined ordering on our e-commerce platform. Available in whole, ground, and k-cup options, Laird Superfood coffees can complement any consumer routine. Our coffees are a hand-picked, high altitude, and shade-grown variety selected for their low acidity. The caffeine from our coffee, combined with the naturally derived MCTs in our creamers, has been reported to provide sustained energy that many consumers seek.
Hydration and Beverage Enhancing Products
Our beverage enhancing product line includes Prebiotic Daily Greens, Antioxidant Daily Reds, Performance Mushrooms, Morning Jumpstart, and Sleep and Recover. Our beverage enhancing products are plant-based, minimally processed, and contain recognizable ingredients.
Prebiotic Daily Greens and Antioxidant Daily Reds were carefully designed to fill nutrient gaps that many Americans face. These products are differentiated from the large group of competitors due to their short ingredient lists, focus on whole foods that the body recognizes, superior taste, and value. Research and Markets sized the U.S. greens powder market at $338.5 million in 2025, with a projected 10.7% CAGR from 2025 to 2032.
Morning Jumpstart competes largely as an alternative to single-serve cold-pressed juices which frequently focus on similar ingredients (lemon cayenne mixes, and superfood greens mixes), and certain other powdered beverages. Unlike many competing products, Morning Jumpstart is unique due to the lack of added sweeteners and its convenient powdered form.
Performance Mushrooms compete in the natural supplement market, which is highly fragmented with several peer companies. Mushroom-based products continue to increase in popularity, and consumers are becoming more knowledgeable on the numerous benefits that they offer. Performance Mushrooms stand apart due to the ingredients being simple, and the fact that its organic mushroom powders, which are grown and manufactured in the U.S., are composed of a blend of varieties that Laird Hamilton specifically chose to fuel his body.
Hydrate
Hydrate, our line of powdered coconut water drink mixes, includes a limited number of ingredients, no artificial sweeteners, chemicals, or colors that are prevalent in most competing sports drinks, and a lower cost per serving than traditional single use packaged sports drinks, electrolyte, and coconut waters. Hydrate’s environmentally friendly powdered form also avoids single use bottles and requires less fuel than the amount required to transport liquids. Hydrate primarily competes against hydration enhancing sports drinks and other powdered electrolyte mixes. Competitors in the U.S. Powdered Electrolyte Mix market, which Grand View Research sized at $2.7 billion in 2024, include Liquid I.V and LMNT. Hydrate also competes within the North American coconut water market, which Grand View Research sized at $908 million in 2024, and which is highly fragmented relative to the sports drink market.
Snacks and Other Food Items
Bars, oatmeal, and other better-for-you foods
Our Protein Bars and Picky Bars seek to provide cleaner alternatives to the $12.4 billion U. S. snack bar market, which is expected to grow at an 8.3% CAGR from 2026 to 2031, per Mintel.
As a result of the Navitas Acquisition, the Company also now offers:
●
Healthy Baking Products: includes organic baking ingredients such as fairtrade cacao powders, nibs and wafers formulated to elevate at‑home baking with clean ingredients;
Wellness Staples: includes superfoods used daily in smoothies, bowls and meal preparation, including chia seeds, matcha powder and acai powder; and
Functional Snacks: includes on‑the‑go superfood bites and organic dried berries, such as goji, mulberry and goldenberries.
Distribution Channels
We generate revenue through two channels: e-commerce and wholesale. Our net sales by distribution channel are reflected below:
E-commerce
Wholesale
During fiscal year 2025, our net sales were approximately evenly split between our wholesale and e-commerce channels, which is consistent with our strategic growth plan. While e-commerce has historically represented the majority of our sales, we expect sales from the wholesale channel to grow as a percentage of our total business as we continue to expand our physical retail footprint, retail distribution, and product assortment.
Our e-commerce channel consists of (i) our Direct-to-consumer (“DTC”) business, which includes sales through our websites and (ii) Amazon.
Lairdsuperfood.com carries our full portfolio of products with the exception of our liquid coffee creamers. It is a place where we can trial new products and gather valuable consumer feedback before we expand into wholesale distribution. Our website also serves as an educational hub where consumers learn about wellness, nutrition, and product benefits through expert content from founders Laird Hamilton and Gabby Reece, ingredient transparency, and customer FAQs. The online platform prioritizes our subscription service which incentivizes our consumers to consistently use our products as staples in their daily lives. Pickybars.com features our complete Picky Bar collection alongside select Laird Superfood products.
On Amazon, we utilize the fulfilled by Amazon distribution processes, wherein we send products to Amazon, and Amazon fulfills orders placed through its online marketplace from its fulfillment centers. Amazon charges us fulfillment fees for this service and may charge storage fees for certain inventory. We sell a number of our top selling SKUs on Amazon, including our powdered coffee creamers, functional coffees, and Performance Mushrooms.
Subscriptions and repeat users play an important role in driving retention rates for our DTC business at lairdsuperfood.com and pickybars.com. Over 80% of DTC net sales came from either subscribers or repeat users in both 2025 and 2024. These dynamics create meaningful recurring revenues and the combination of repeat usage, order frequency and retention rates inform our views on strategic marketing spend and customer unit economics.
Laird Superfood products are sold through a diverse set of retail stores, including conventional, natural, and specialty grocery, club, and food service outlets. Our wholesale channel sales grew by 41% in 2025 compared to 2024, due in equal parts to our distribution footprint expansion and higher velocities at shelf.
Supply Chain
We source our raw materials from a variety of suppliers located both inside and outside the United States. We purchased a substantial portion of our products from two suppliers in 2025. There are multiple sources of roasted coffee products, coconut milk powder, and coconut water powder available, and we believe that we would be able to find suitable replacements for these suppliers on substantially similar terms. Raw materials are shipped to third-party production facilities (“co-manufacturer”) where they are stored until used in production. These raw materials are then mixed and packaged into finished goods. Finished goods are then warehoused and shipped to both retail and wholesale customers, as well as to distributors across the country.
Laird Superfood has a supplier code of conduct for the ethical sourcing of raw materials from within and outside the United States, which we provide to suppliers as part of the supplier-onboarding process.
Regulation
We are subject to a wide range of governmental regulations and policies. We are required to comply with the regulations and policies promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the United States Department of Agriculture (the “USDA”), the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Department of Labor, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, among others, in addition to corresponding state, and local agencies. In addition, the FTC monitors claims made by companies, particularly with celebrity spokespeople, including health claims about products. Our importers, packers, distributors, and suppliers are also subject to various laws and regulations relating to, among others, food safety, environmental protection, and worker health and safety matters.
USDA National Organic Program and Similar Regulations
We are involved in the sourcing, manufacturing, supplying, processing, marketing, selling and distribution of organic food products and, as such, are subject to certain organic certification and quality assurance standards. The Organic Foods Production Act of 1990 (the “OFPA”) mandates that the USDA develop national standards for organically produced agricultural products to assure consumers that those products marketed as organic meet consistent, uniform standards. USDA has implemented the Organic Food Production Act through the Natural Organic Program (“NOP”) regulations which were recently updated and strengthened through the USDA’s Strengthening Organic Enforcement rule. We currently manufacture and distribute a number of organic products that are subject to the standards set forth in the OFPA and the NOP regulations. Our organic products are certified organic by a USDA-accredited certifying agent, and we believe that we are in material compliance with the organic regulations applicable to our business.
Additionally, our organic products may be subject to various state regulations. Many states have adopted their own organic programs making the state agency responsible for enforcing USDA regulations for organic operations. However, state organic programs may also add more restrictive requirements due to specific environmental conditions or the necessity of production and handling practices in the state.
Food-Related Regulations
As a manufacturer and distributor of food products and dietary supplements, we are also subject to a number of federal, state, and local food-related regulations, including, but not limited to, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended (the “FDCA”) and extensive regulations promulgated thereunder by the FDA. This comprehensive regulatory framework governs the manufacture (including composition and ingredients), labeling, packaging and safety of foods, beverages, and dietary supplements in the U.S. Among other matters, the FDA:
•
Requires the registration of facilities that process, pack, and hold food (including dietary supplements) and regulates manufacturing practices for foods through its current good manufacturing practices, preventative controls regulations, and other regulations impacting food manufacturing;
Regulates the use of specific direct and indirect food additives, other ingredients, and ingredient safety; and
Prescribes the format and content of certain information required to appear on food and dietary supplement product labels.
Some of the key food safety and food labeling regulations in the U.S. are discussed in the following sections. We are subject to the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011 (“FSMA”), which, among other things, amended the FDCA to require FDA-regulated food facilities to develop and implement a written food safety plan including a hazard analysis and preventative controls program to minimize or prevent food safety hazards (“HACCP” plans). The FDA also enforces the Public Health Service Act and regulations issued thereunder, which authorizes regulatory activity necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases. We are subject to numerous other federal, state, and local regulations involving such matters as the licensing and registration of manufacturing facilities, enforcement by government health agencies of standards for our products, inspection of our facilities and regulation of our trade practices in connection with the sale of food products and dietary supplements.
Food Safety Regulations
FSMA enabled the FDA to better protect public health by strengthening the food safety system through several new foundational regulations. The law provided the FDA with new enforcement authorities and tools designed to achieve higher rates of compliance with prevention- and risk-based food safety standards and to better respond to and contain problems when they do occur.
We believe that we are in material compliance with the currently effective regulations promulgated by the FDA to implement FSMA to the extent that such regulations are applicable to our business. We have developed a program that we believe is in compliance with this regulation.
The FDA’s Foreign Supplier Verification Program requires that the United States owner or consignee of imported food take steps to verify that the foreign supplier of imported food is manufacturing the food in accordance with FDA requirements, that the importer understand what hazards the foreign supplier is controlling and how those hazards are controlled, and that this oversight program is documented. The regulation is being implemented using a tiered series of compliance dates based on the size of the U.S. importer and the foreign supplier. We have developed a program that we believe is in compliance with this regulation.
We are also subject to numerous other federal, state, and local regulations involving such matters as the licensing and registration of manufacturing facilities, food safety systems, sanitary transportation of food products, record keeping, enforcement by government health agencies of standards for our products, inspection of our facilities and regulation of our trade practices in connection with the sale of food products.
Dietary Supplement Regulations
In addition to our conventional food products, we operate in the dietary supplement industry and label, distribute and market our dietary supplement products. The dietary supplement industry is fast paced, highly fragmented, and intensely competitive. It includes companies that manufacture and distribute products that are intended to support the body’s performance and well-being. Dietary supplements include vitamins, minerals, other supplements, herbs, botanicals, and compounds derived therefrom.
The FDA regulates the formulation, manufacturing, packaging, storage, labeling, promotion, distribution, and sale of dietary supplements. In January 2000, the FDA issued a final rule called “Statements Made for Dietary Supplements Concerning the Effect of the Product on the Structure or Function of the Body.” In the rule and its preamble, the FDA distinguished between permitted claims under the FDCA relating to the effect of dietary supplements on the structure or functions of the body, and impermissible direct or implied claims of the effect of dietary supplements on any disease. In June 2007, the FDA issued a rule, as authorized under the FDCA, that defined current Good Manufacturing Practices in the manufacture and holding of dietary supplements. Effective January 1, 2006, legislation required specific disclosures in labeling where a food, including a dietary supplement, contains an ingredient derived from any of eight named allergens. Legislation passed at the end of 2006 now requires us to report to the FDA any reports of “serious adverse events” associated with the use of a dietary supplement or an over-the-counter drug that is not covered by new drug approval reporting. The FDA created the Office of Dietary Supplements (“ODSP”) on December 21, 2015, which elevated the FDA’s program from its previous status as a division under the Office of Nutrition and Dietary Supplements. However, FDA underwent a reorganization on October 1, 2024, resulting in ODSP now reporting to the Office of Food Chemical Safety, Dietary Supplements, and Innovation (“OFCSDSI”).
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994, referred to as DSHEA, revised the provisions of the FDCA concerning the composition and labeling of dietary supplements and statutorily created a new class entitled “dietary supplements.” Dietary supplements include vitamins, minerals, herbs, amino acids, and other dietary substances used to supplement diets. Some of our products are considered dietary supplements as outlined in the FDCA, which requires us to maintain evidence that a dietary supplement is reasonably safe. A manufacturer of dietary supplements may make statements concerning the effect of a supplement or a dietary ingredient on the structure or any function of the body, in accordance with the regulations described above. As a result, we make such statements with respect to our products. In some cases, such statements must be accompanied by a statutory statement that the claim has not been evaluated by the FDA and that the product is not intended to treat, cure, mitigate, or prevent any disease, and the FDA must be notified of such claim within 30 days of first use.
Food and Dietary Supplement Labeling Regulations
We are subject to various labelling requirements with respect to our products at the federal, state, and local levels. At the federal level, the FDA has authority to review product labels and, increasingly, website and social media content. The FTC has the primary authority to regulate advertising materials, including online and television advertisements, to determine if advertising materials are misleading. The Company is subject to certain requirements relating to food and dietary supplement labeling under the FDCA and corresponding FDA regulations as well as corresponding state laws and regulations. Labeling for our products must also comply with the Bioengineered Food Disclosure Standard and NOP standards required by the USDA.
The FDA requires that all food products be labeled to disclose the net contents, the identity of commodity, nutrition information, and the name and place of business of the product’s manufacturer, packer, or distributor. Both the FDA and FTC also require that any claim on the product be truthful and not misleading. The FDA also has detailed regulations and requirements governing various types of claims about products’ nutritional value and wellness benefits, such as a nutrient content claims, health claims, and structure-function claims. Claims falling under these regulations must be phrased in specific ways to avoid misrepresenting the food. We believe we are in compliance with applicable FDA and FTC claims regulations.
Other state and local statutes and regulations may impose additional food labeling requirements. For instance, the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986 (commonly known as Proposition 65) requires, with a few exceptions, that a specific warning appear on any consumer product sold in California that contains a substance, above certain levels, listed by that state as having been found to cause cancer or birth defects. This law exposes all food and beverage producers to the possibility of having to provide warnings on their products.
We believe that we are in material compliance with existing food-related regulations applicable to our business. It is possible, although we believe unlikely, that the cost of our continued compliance with existing and future food-related regulations could have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings, cash flows, or competitive position in the foreseeable future, due to increased regulatory changes and uncertainty associated with the 2025 change in presidential administration.
If we fail to comply with these or other laws and regulations enforced by the FDA, FTC, or USDA, we may be subject to various administrative, civil, or even criminal penalties that could adversely affect our business and its operations.
Consumer Protection Regulations
The FTC has the authority to regulate traditional and digital advertising for most types of consumer products, including our product offerings. The FTC has interpreted the Federal Trade Commission Act (the “FTC Act”) to prohibit unfair or deceptive acts or practices in commerce and oversees express and implied claims in advertising as well as certain promotional activities such as the use of social media influencers by advertising companies.
Our marketing, advertising, and promotional activities for our consumer products must adhere to the FTC Act’s requirement for truthful, non-misleading and adequately substantiated claims. If our advertising does not comply with FTC and similar state requirements, we could become subject to an investigation by the FTC or a consent decree, which could have a material adverse impact on our business and reputation.
In addition, we are subject to various state and local consumer protection laws, including laws that allow for private class action litigation challenges to the labeling, marketing, and advertising of foods as well as state laws regulating food packaging materials and composition.
We believe that we are in material compliance with existing consumer protection regulations applicable to our business but note that compliance does not preclude all risk of consumer litigation. We do not expect the cost of our continued compliance with existing consumer protection regulations to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings, cash flows or competitive position in the foreseeable future.
Intellectual Property
We have the right to the following material trademarks and certain related logos: Laird Superfood, Superfood Creamer, Navitas, Food for the Modern Life, Live Life Positive, Superfood+, Superfoods with Purpose, Picky Bars, and Picky Bars Drizzle in the United States, and Laird Superfood in several international jurisdictions, including the European Union. Additionally, certain of our product packaging is subject to copyright.
Human Capital Resources
Laird Superfood is guided by a strong vision, mission, and values set. As of December 31, 2025, we had 26 full-time employees and two part-time employees, none of whom are represented by labor unions or covered by collective bargaining agreements.
The Company manages the full employee life cycle, from talent acquisition to career development and succession planning, aiming to maintain a highly engaged and productive workforce. We recruit top talent directly and through external firms in addition to our partnerships with colleges and universities.
A robust onboarding process ensures all employees understand the Company’s history, vision, mission, values, and goals. Communication is emphasized through monthly town hall meetings, departmental updates, and regular one-on-one meetings.
An annual talent review identifies top performers and high-potential employees, informing development activities. Laird Superfood supports internal growth and offers external leadership development opportunities, as well as internal training on key competencies. Regular talent reviews are crucial for meeting future business needs.
With the goal of retaining top talent and ensuring equitable pay practices, we offer competitive salaries and benefits including employer paid medical and vision insurance, dental insurance, life and short-term disability insurance, paid time off, and a retirement savings plan with an employer safe harbor contribution, and participation in our equity incentive program.
We believe diversity and inclusion enable the Company to benefit from multiple points of view and broad thinking innovation. Diversity and inclusion better position us to understand our customers’ needs and to ultimately succeed in our vision of providing better food for a better world. Our workforce is likewise gender diverse. We continue to seek opportunities for building an inclusive culture that encourages, supports, and celebrates the diverse voices of our world.
Corporate Information
We were originally formed in 2015 and are currently incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. On March 12, 2026, we consummated the Navitas Acquisition. Our principal executive offices are located at 5303 Spine Road, Suite 204, Boulder, Colorado, 80301. Our websites are www.lairdsuperfood.com and www.pickybars.com. We make available on or through www.lairdsuperfood.com certain reports and amendments to those reports that we file with or furnish to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These include our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and our current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. We make this information available on or through our website free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file the information with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding our filings, at www.sec.gov. We have included our website address in this Form 10-K as an inactive textual reference only. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our websites are not part of this Form 10-K. You should not rely on any information contained or included on our website in making your decision whether to purchase our common stock.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
Our business is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Investors should carefully read the following factors as well as the cautionary statements referred to in “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included herein. If any of the risks and uncertainties described below or elsewhere in this Form 10-K occur, the Company’s business, financial condition, or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Risks Relating to Our Limited Operating History, Financial Position and Capital Needs
We are an early-stage company and have incurred significant losses since our inception. We may continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future.
We are an early-stage company. We were formed and commenced operations in June 2015. We face all the risks encountered by young companies, including significant competition from existing and emerging competitors, many of which are established and have greater access to capital than we do. In addition, as a newer business, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays, and other known and unknown factors. We will need to transition from an early-stage company to a company capable of supporting larger scale commercial activities. If we are not successful in such a transition, our business, results, and financial condition will be harmed.
We may need additional funding in order to grow our business.
We have historically financed our operations through our initial public offering, private placements of our common and preferred stock, borrowings under loan agreements, and, recently, through our core operating activities. We have devoted substantially all our financial resources and efforts to developing our products, workforce, building awareness of our brand, and growing retail distribution. Our long-term growth and success are dependent upon our ability to consistently generate cash from operating activities. Although we have been generating cash from operations over the last 15 months, there is no assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash from operations or access the capital we need to grow our business long term. Our inability to obtain additional capital could have a material adverse effect on our ability to fully implement our business plan and grow our business, to a greater extent than we can with our existing financial resources.
If our available cash balances and anticipated cash flow from operations are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements including lower demand for our products or due to other risks described herein, we may seek to sell common stock or preferred stock or convertible debt securities, enter into an additional credit facility or another form of third-party funding or seek other debt financing.
We may also consider raising additional capital in the future to expand our business, to pursue strategic investments, to take advantage of financing opportunities or for other reasons, including to:
acquire or invest in complementary businesses or assets;
increase our sales and marketing efforts and address competitive developments;
provide for supply and inventory costs;
fund development and marketing efforts of any future products or additional features to then-current products;
acquire, license, or invest in new technologies; or
finance capital expenditures and general and administrative expenses.
Our present and future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including:
our ability to achieve revenue growth and further improve gross margins;
the cost of expanding our operations and offerings, including our sales and marketing efforts; and
the effect of competing market developments.
The various ways we could raise additional capital carry potential risks. If we raise funds by issuing equity securities, dilution to our shareholders could result. Any equity securities issued could also provide for rights, preferences, or privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. If we raise funds by issuing debt securities, those debt securities would have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. The terms of debt securities issued or borrowings pursuant to a credit agreement could impose significant restrictions on our operations. If we raise funds through collaborations and licensing arrangements, we might be required to relinquish significant rights or grant licenses on terms that are not favorable to us.
Our limited operating history may make it difficult to assess our future viability.
We believe that growth of our revenue depends on several factors, including our ability to:
expand our existing channels of distribution;
develop additional channels of distribution;
grow our customer base;
cost-effectively increase e-commerce sales at our direct website and third-party marketplaces;
effectively introduce new products;
increase awareness of our brand; and
effectively source key raw materials.
We may not successfully accomplish any of these objectives, and even if we are successful in growing our revenues, we expect our revenue growth rate will decline as our revenue increases. We may not consistently generate positive cash flow in the future. Consequently, considering our limited operating history, any predictions about our future success or viability may not be accurate.
We may be unable to manage our future growth effectively, which could make it difficult to execute our business strategy.
Our growth since inception has placed, and may continue to place, significant demands on our organizational, administrative, and operational infrastructure, including manufacturing operations, quality control, technical support and customer service, sales force management, and general and financial administration. As we continue to grow, we will need to make significant investments in multiple facets of our company, including in sales, marketing, product development, information technology, and personnel. We will also need to improve our operational, financial and management controls as well as our reporting systems and procedures.
If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, we may be unable to execute our business plan, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operations. Managing our planned growth effectively will require us to:
maintain a low cost of customer acquisition relative to customer lifetime value;
identify products that will be viewed favorably by customers; and
successfully hire, train, and motivate employees, including additional personnel for our technological, sales and marketing efforts.
The majority of our direct costs are variable, and we believe that we have headcount to support significant growth. However, any future increases in expenditures in anticipation of future sales that do not materialize could adversely affect our profitability. In addition, if we are unable to effectively manage the growth of our business, the quality of our products may suffer, and we may be unable to address competitive challenges, which would adversely affect our overall business, operations, and financial condition.
We have a history of losses, and we may be unable to sustain profitability and positive cash flows from operating activities.
We have not generated consistent positive cash flows. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we incurred a net cash usage of approximately $3.2 million, and in prior periods we have experienced operating losses. While we intend that our strategic initiatives to improve operating performance over time, we may not be able to generate positive cash flow on a consistent basis in the future. In fiscal years 2025 and 2024, we incurred operating losses of $3.4 and $2.2 million, respectively. Over time our operating expenses may increase as we hire additional employees, support our strategic and other customer relationships, innovate and commercialize products, build our brand, expand our marketing channels, drive consumer adoption of our products, increase our customer base, supplier network, and co-manufacturing partners and review geographic expansion. These efforts may prove more expensive than we anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenues and margins sufficiently to offset the anticipated higher expenses. Accordingly, we may not be able to successfully implement our long-term growth strategies or achieve or sustain profitability, and we may incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.
Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.
We are subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. We must design our disclosure controls and procedures to reasonably assure that information we must disclose in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, and recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. We believe that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well-conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. For example, our directors or executive officers could inadvertently fail to disclose a new relationship or arrangement causing us to fail to disclose a required related party transaction disclosure. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by an unauthorized override of the controls. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in our control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Risks Relating to Our Business
We may not be able to effectively integrate the businesses of Navitas, or realize the anticipated benefits and synergies expected from the Navitas Acquisition.
The anticipated benefits from acquiring Navitas and its business. The anticipated benefits and estimates of future growth, synergies and optimizations of the Navitas Acquisition may not be realized fully or at all, may take longer to realize than expected or could have other adverse effects that we do not currently foresee. The failure to realize the anticipated benefits and synergies expected from Navitas Acquisition could adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
In addition, the integration of Navitas is complex, costly and time consuming, and we have devoted, and will continue to devote, significant management attention and resources to integrating the respective business practices and operations of Navitas. Potential difficulties that we may encounter as part of the integration process include the following:
our inability to successfully combine our business with the business of Navitas in a manner that permits us to achieve, on a timely basis or at all, the enhanced revenue opportunities, cost savings and other benefits anticipated to result from the Navitas Acquisition;
complexities associated with managing our existing business and Navitas, including difficulty addressing possible differences in operational philosophies and the challenge of integrating the products of Navitas in a seamless manner that minimizes any adverse impact on customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies;
the assumption of contractual obligations with less favorable or more restrictive terms; and
potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses or delays associated with the transactions.
Any of these issues could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies or achieve the anticipated benefits of the Navitas Acquisition or could negatively impact our earnings or otherwise adversely affect our business and financial results.
The integration and transition associated with the Navitas Acquisition may result in the Company incurring significant costs to implement changes to its control over financial reporting following the Navitas Acquisition.
The integration of Navitas may result in the Company incurring significant costs, including management time, to integrate and implement changes to its controls over financial reporting. The Navitas Acquisition may necessitate significant modifications to Company’s internal control systems, processes and information systems, both on a transitional basis and over the longer-term as Navitas is fully integrated. The Company cannot be certain that changes to its internal control over financial reporting will be effective for any period, or implemented in an efficient manner which does not incur significant costs and management time. If we are unable to implement such changes to our internal controls over financial reporting in an efficient manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations and the market perception thereof may be adversely affected.
Nexus controls the Company and its interests may conflict with the interests of our other stockholders.
Based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of March 23, 2026, following the issuance of the Initial Shares, Nexus holds Series A Preferred Stock convertible into 56.2% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock (or 73.9% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock assuming the issuance of up to an aggregate of 60,000 additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock the Company has the option to require the Investor to purchase pursuant to the terms of the Investment Agreement (such shares, the “Additional Shares”). As a result, Nexus is able to exert significant influence over the outcome of matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election and removal of directors, amendments to our organizational documents, and the approval of any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets or other significant corporate transactions. Nexus’s interests and strategy may differ from, or conflict with, those of our other stockholders, and Nexus may support strategies, financings, acquisitions, dispositions, restructurings, special dividends, share repurchases or other transactions that involve greater risk, leverage or short-term focus than our other stockholders might prefer. As a result, Nexus’s control of the Company could depress the trading price of our common stock, preclude or discourage transactions that might otherwise be favorable to minority stockholders, and limit the ability of current stockholders to influence corporate matters.
Nexus has certain director appointment rights, which limits the ability of other stockholders to affect the outcome of director elections.
The Company (i) increased the number of directors serving on the Board to nine and (ii) appointed four designees of Nexus (the “Nexus Designees”) to the Board to serve for a term expiring at the Company’s next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified, with Grant LaMontagne being deemed the fifth Nexus Designee. Thereafter, the number of Nexus Designees will adjust proportionately to Nexus’s ownership thresholds, subject to applicable law and stock exchange rules. Subject to applicable law, Nexus has the right to remove, with or without cause, any Nexus Designee at any time upon two business days’ notice. Consequently, the directors serving on the Board prior to the Transactions no longer constitute a majority of the Board and have reduced influence over strategic direction, management oversight and corporate governance policies, which may limit the ability of other stockholders to effect change through director elections.
Nexus has certain limited consent rights that could prevent us from taking certain corporate actions.
Nexus has certain limited consent rights with respect to our ability to take certain corporate actions, including the following:
any actions that would result in any control share acquisition, interested stockholder, business combination or similar anti-takeover provision in the Nevada Revised Statutes and/or the Company’s organizational documents becoming applicable to the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock as a result of the Preferred Stock Issuance, the Navitas Acquisition or any transaction related thereto, including the Company’s issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of common stock at a fixed conversion price of $3.57, subject to certain customary anti-dilution adjustments (such shares, the “Conversion Shares”);
adopt, approve or agree to adopt a stockholder rights agreement, “poison pill” or similar anti-takeover agreement or plan that is applicable to the holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock, subject to certain exceptions;
authorize or issue any Parity Securities or Senior Securities (each as defined in the Investment Agreement), or amend or alter the Company’s organizational documents to authorize or create, or increase the number of authorized or issued shares of, or any securities convertible into shares of, or reclassify any security into, any Parity Securities (including any increase in the number of authorized or issued shares of Series A Preferred Stock) or Senior Securities;
issue any shares of Series A Preferred Stock to any person other than to Nexus and its affiliates;
cause any subsidiary to issue any equity securities, subject to certain exceptions; or
any action to effect any voluntary deregistration of the common stock under the Exchange Act, or any voluntary delisting with NYSE American of the common stock other than in connection with a concurrent relist with another national securities exchange.
The consent rights of Nexus could prevent us from obtaining future financings, or to otherwise conduct necessary corporate activities, and as a result may adversely affect our business, operating results and stock price.
Our status as a controlled company may permit us to rely on exemptions from certain of the NYSE American’s corporate governance requirements, which could reduce protections for minority stockholders.
We qualify as a “controlled company” under the rules of NYSE American and may elect to rely on certain corporate governance exemptions, including exemptions from requirements that a majority of the board be independent and that our compensation and nominating committees be composed entirely of independent directors. Being a controlled company may reduce the protections otherwise available to our minority stockholders.
We depend on third parties for manufacturing and distribution.
We depend on third-party service providers for raw materials, manufacturing, and distribution. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 72% of our inventory was held by two partners. Our business could be adversely affected if these providers fail to meet their obligations, experience disruptions, fail to comply with relevant laws and regulations, or if we need to change providers with short notice. For example, on February 7, 2025, we received a letter from a co-manufacturer, which manufactures liquid creamers, indicating their intention to terminate our Processing Agreement six months from the date of the letter, prior to the contractual end date. While this did not result in any material impact on our business and were able to find a new co-manufacturer, if we had been unable to locate a new partner before we sold through our existing stock of liquid creamers, we could have experienced out-of-stocks that impacted our sales of that product line until we found a new, suitable partner. Limited availability of co-manufacturers that meet our high standards adds to this risk. In addition, if we fail to secure terms that are beneficial for us, our margins could be impacted. If we cannot maintain sufficient and satisfactory production, warehousing, and distribution capacity though third-party agreements, we may be unable to meet customer demand and/or our manufacturing, distribution, and warehousing costs may increase, which could negatively affect our business.
Competition in the food and beverage retail industry, especially online competition, is strong and presents an ongoing threat to the success of our business.
The food and beverage industry is very competitive both online and in wholesale markets. We compete with larger retailers with longer histories, greater brand recognition, more resources, and numerous natural and organic producers. Changes in our competitors’ strategies or consumer preferences could negatively affect our sales and profitability. Despite our efforts to differentiate ourselves by providing an expanding selection of natural, organic, and functional products, competitive pricing, convenience, and exceptional customer service, some of our competitors have significantly more resources than we do, which may pose significant challenges. For example, if natural, organic, and functional food and beverage competitors seek to gain or retain market share by reducing prices, we would likely be forced to reduce our prices on similar product offerings in order to remain competitive, which may result in a decrease in our market share, net sales and profitability and may require a change in our operating strategies.
If changes in consumer preferences decrease the competitive advantage attributable to these factors, or if we fail to otherwise positively differentiate our product offering or customer experience from our competitors, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
We expect competition in the natural, organic, and functional food and beverage industry, and in particular Internet-based competition, generally to continue to increase. We believe that our ability to compete successfully in this market depends upon many factors both within and beyond our control, including:
the size and composition of our customer base;
the number of products that we feature on our websites;
the quality and responsiveness of customer service;
our selling and marketing efforts;
the quality and price of the products that we offer;
the convenience of the shopping experience that we provide;
rapid changes affecting global, national, and regional economies;
our ability to manage our third-party manufacturing and logistics partners; and
our reputation and brand strength.
If we fail to compete successfully in this market, our business, financial condition, and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.
We may not be able to successfully implement our growth strategy for our brand on a timely basis or at all.
We believe that our future success depends, in part, on our ability to implement our growth strategy of leveraging our existing brands and products to drive increased sales. However, we face many risks, uncertainties and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stage of development, particularly companies in the rapidly evolving natural, organic, and functional food and beverage industry. Our ability to implement our growth strategy depends, among other things, on our ability to:
develop and introduce new and appealing products in our portfolio of brands and successfully innovate on our existing products;
successfully compete in the product categories in which we choose to operate;
attract and maintain a large customer base and develop and grow that customer base;
increase awareness of our portfolio of brands and develop effective marketing strategies to ensure consumer loyalty;
establish and maintain strategic relationships with key sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution providers; and
attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel.
We may not be able to implement this growth strategy successfully. Our planned marketing expenditures may not result in increased total sales or generate sufficient levels of consumer interest or brand awareness. Our sales and results of operations will be negatively affected if we fail to implement our growth strategy or if we invest resources in a growth strategy that ultimately proves unsuccessful.
Our Laird Superfood products are new, and our industry is rapidly evolving.
Laird Superfood is in the early stages of commercializing some products and we are constantly innovating. The success of these products is uncertain—they may not reach commercialization, sell as expected, or be manufactured as planned. Developing and launching new products is costly and time-consuming. If a product fails to gain market acceptance or cannot be manufactured or marketed as anticipated, the investment may be lost. Failures in product development or quality could lead to customer loss and potential claims, adversely affecting the Company’s business and financial health. The market for Laird Superfood’s products is new and evolving, making it difficult to predict its size and growth. Additionally, manufacturing costs and market demand are uncertain. Success in developing and manufacturing new products, including through co-packers, is not guaranteed. If the market for new products fails to develop or becomes saturated with competitors, it could negatively impact the Company’s financial condition and operating results.
We are subject to the risks associated with conducting business operations outside of the U.S., which could adversely affect our business.
We purchase our products from a variety of suppliers, including international suppliers. Our direct purchases from non-US suppliers represented a majority of our raw materials, and we expect our international purchases may grow with time. Additionally, we may source from new non-US suppliers over time as raw material availability changes. We may in the future enter into agreements with distributors in foreign countries to sell our products. All of these activities are subject to the uncertainties associated with international business operations, including:
difficulties with foreign and geographically dispersed operations;
having to comply with various U.S. and international laws;
changes and uncertainties relating to foreign rules and regulations;
tariffs, export or import restrictions, restrictions on remittances abroad, imposition of duties or taxes that limit our ability to import necessary materials;
limitations on our ability to enter into cost-effective arrangements with distributors, or at all;
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates;
imposition of limitations on production, sale or export in foreign countries, including due to pandemic or quarantine;
imposition of limitations on or increase of withholding and other taxes on remittances and other payments by foreign processors or joint ventures;
imposition of differing labor laws and standards;
economic, political, environmental, health-related, or social instability in foreign countries and regions;
an inability, or reduced ability, to protect our intellectual property;
availability of government subsidies or other incentives that benefit competitors in their local markets that are not available to us;
difficulties in enforcing contracts and legal decisions; and
less developed infrastructure.
If we expand into other target markets, we cannot assure you that our expansion plans will be realized, or if realized, be successful. We expect each market to have particular regulatory and funding hurdles to overcome and any future developments in these markets, including the uncertainty relating to governmental policies and regulations, could harm our business. If we expend significant time and resources on expansion plans that fail or are delayed, our reputation, business and financial condition may be harmed.
In addition, we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws, which generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials or other third parties for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. While our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, our internal control policies and procedures may not protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or agents. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
All risks relating to business operations outside of the U.S. may be exacerbated by the current U.S. political climate. For example, changes in U.S. trade policy, including the imposition of tariffs on certain imported goods, could affect our business and results of operations. While the majority of our products and raw materials are currently excluded from applicable U.S. tariffs, and we do not believe current tariffs have had a material impact on our cost structure, future changes in trade policies, including the expansion of tariffs, removal of exclusions, or the imposition of reciprocal measures by other countries, could increase the cost of certain raw materials or disrupt our supply chain. The scope, duration, and ultimate impact of tariffs remain uncertain and depend on a number of factors, including governmental actions, negotiations between countries, the availability of alternative sourcing options, and broader economic conditions
The ultimate impact of changing trade policies on our business will depend on various factors, including the magnitude, duration and nature of tariffs. While we actively monitor these developments, we may not be able to fully mitigate the adverse impact of potential tariff initiatives or other trade-related disruptions.
Our results may be negatively affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Currently, substantially all of our international purchase and sales contracts are denominated in U.S. dollars and generally do not guarantee long term pricing. As a result, a decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could increase our costs in dollars for the food products and ingredients that we import from other countries. In addition, an increase in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies could require us to reduce our selling price or risk making our products less competitive in international markets. The Company has not historically hedged foreign exchange risks.
Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes to offset future taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purposes may be significantly limited due to various circumstances, including certain possible future transactions involving the sale or issuance of our common stock, or if taxable income does not reach sufficient levels.
As of December 31, 2025, the Company reported consolidated U.S. federal net operating loss (“NOLs”) carryforwards of approximately $146.6 million. The Company’s ability to use its NOL carryforwards and certain other tax attributes will depend on the amount of taxable income it generates in future periods and, as a result, certain of the Company’s NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes may expire before it can generate sufficient taxable income to use them in full. In addition, the Company’s ability to use its NOL carryforwards and certain other tax attributes to offset future taxable income may be limited if it experiences an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Potential future transactions involving the sale or issuance of our common stock may increase the possibility that the Company will experience a future “ownership change” under Section 382. Such transactions may include the issuance of our common stock for cash, the conversion of any future convertible debt, the repurchase of any debt with the Company’s common stock, the acquisition or disposition of any stock by a stockholder owning 5% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock, or a combination of the foregoing.
We may be unable to adequately protect our brand and our other intellectual property rights.
We regard our brand, customer lists, trademarks, domain names, trade secrets and similar intellectual property as critical to our success. We may rely on trademark, copyright and patent law, trade secret protection, agreements and other methods with our employees and others to protect our proprietary rights. We might not be able to obtain broad protection in the United States for all our intellectual property. The protection of our intellectual property rights may require the expenditure of significant financial, managerial, and operational resources. Moreover, the steps we take to protect our intellectual property may not adequately protect our rights or prevent third parties from infringing or misappropriating our proprietary rights, and we may be unable to broadly enforce all our trademarks. Any of our patents, trademarks or other intellectual property rights may be challenged by others or invalidated through administrative process or litigation. Our patent and trademark applications may never be granted. To date, the Company has not applied for patent protection on any of its technology. The process of obtaining patent protection is expensive and time-consuming, and we may be unable to prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. Even if issued, there can be no assurance that these patents will adequately protect our intellectual property, as the legal standards relating to the validity, enforceability, and scope of protection of patent and other intellectual property rights are uncertain. We also cannot be certain that others will not independently develop or otherwise acquire equivalent or superior technology or intellectual property rights. Furthermore, our confidentiality agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of our proprietary information, technologies and processes and may not provide an adequate remedy in the event of unauthorized disclosure of such information.
We might be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our intellectual property rights. For example, we may initiate claims or litigation against others for infringement, misappropriation or violation of our intellectual property rights or other proprietary rights or to establish the validity of such rights. However, we may be unable to discover or determine the extent of any infringement, misappropriation or other violation of our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights. In addition, despite our efforts, we may be unable to prevent third parties from infringing upon, misappropriating or otherwise violating our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights. Any litigation, whether or not it is resolved in our favor, could result in significant expense to us and divert the efforts of our technical and management personnel, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
In addition, our technology platform may use open-source software. The use of such open source software may subject us to certain conditions, including the obligation to offer, distribute, or disclose our technology platform for no or reduced cost, make the proprietary source code subject to open source software licenses available to the public, license our software and systems that use open source software for the purpose of making derivative works, or allow reverse assembly, disassembly, or reverse engineering. We monitor our use of open-source software to avoid subjecting our technology platform to conditions we do not intend. However, if our technology platform becomes subject to such unintended conditions, it could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We may not be able to enforce our intellectual property rights throughout the world.
The laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. This could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement or the misappropriation of our intellectual property rights. The loss of the Laird Superfood brand or logo or other registered or common law trade names or a diminution in the perceived quality of products or services associated with the Company would harm our business. Our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights in such countries may be inadequate. In addition, changes in the law and legal decisions by courts in the United States and foreign countries may affect our ability to obtain adequate protection for our technology and the enforcement of intellectual property.
Third parties may assert that our employees or consultants have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information or misappropriated trade secrets.
Although we try to ensure that our employees and consultants do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of a former employer or other third parties. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.
A food safety or quality issue that results in a product disruption such as a recall, health issue, or death of a consumer could harm our business.
The sale of products for human use and consumption involves the risk of injury or illness to consumers. Such injuries may result from inadvertent mislabeling, tampering by unauthorized third parties, deficiencies on behalf of our co-manufacturers, product contamination, or spoilage. Under certain circumstances we have in the past been, and may be required in the future, to recall or withdraw products, suspend production of our products, or cease operations, which may lead to a material adverse effect on our business. For example, in the first quarter of 2023, we discovered a sensory product quality issue with coconut milk powder from one of our suppliers and immediately initiated a voluntary product withdrawal. We contacted all impacted wholesaler customers and e-commerce customers to aggressively pull back as much of the affected product as possible. In connection with this withdrawal, we incurred costs associated with inventory obsolescence, quality testing, remedial discounts and replacement orders, and lost sales due to out of stocks. We implemented a robust sensory testing program to prevent future quality issues.
Even if a situation does not necessitate a recall or market withdrawal, product liability claims might be asserted against us. While we are subject to governmental inspection and regulations and believe our facilities and those of our co-packers and suppliers comply in all material respects with all applicable laws and regulations, if the purchase or consumption of any of our products is alleged to have caused a legally recognizable injury (including financial loss), a health-related illness (such as listeria) or death to a consumer, we may become subject to claims or lawsuits relating to such matters. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused loss, illness, or physical harm could cause consumers to lose confidence in the safety and quality of our products or accuracy of our marketing. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this type might not be covered by our insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others, including our co-manufacturers. Although we maintain product liability and product recall insurance in an amount that we believe to be consistent with market practice, we cannot be sure that we will not incur claims or liabilities for which we are not insured or that exceed the amount of our insurance coverage. A product liability judgment against us or a product recall could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
We may be subject to significant liability that is not covered by insurance.
Although we believe that the extent of our insurance coverage is consistent with industry practice, any claim under our insurance policies may be subject to certain exceptions, may not be honored fully, in a timely manner, or at all, and we may not have purchased sufficient insurance to cover all losses incurred. If we were to incur substantial liabilities or if our business operations were interrupted for a substantial period, we could incur costs and suffer losses. Inventory, equipment, and business interruption losses may not be covered by our insurance policies. Additionally, in the future, insurance coverage may not be available to us at commercially acceptable premiums, or at all.
We rely on independent certification for a number of our products.
We rely on independent third-party certification, such as certifications of our products as “organic” or “Non-GMO” (non-genetically modified organisms), to differentiate our products from others. We must comply with the requirements of independent organizations or certification authorities in order to label our products as certified organic. We must maintain our organic handler certification and ensure that our organic ingredient suppliers hold and maintain necessary certification. For example, we can lose our “organic” certification if a manufacturing plant becomes contaminated with non-organic materials, if it is not adequately cleaned after a production run, or we mislabel a product as “organic.” In addition, all raw materials must be certified organic. The loss of any independent certifications could adversely affect our market position as an organic and natural products company, which could harm our business. Additionally, if any of our third-party certifiers are subject to compliance or legal issues or negative publicity, our reputation and business could be harmed by our association with such entity.
Our future results of operations may be adversely affected by the availability of Non-GMO and organic ingredients.
Our ability to ensure a continuing supply of Non-GMO and organic ingredients at competitive prices depends on many factors beyond our control, such as the number and size of farms that grow organic crops, climate conditions, changes in national and world economic conditions, currency fluctuations and forecasting adequate need of seasonal ingredients.
The organic ingredients that we use in the production of our products (including, among others, coffee, coconut sugar, coconut milk powder, and extra virgin coconut oil) are vulnerable to adverse weather conditions and natural disasters, such as floods, droughts, water scarcity, temperature extremes, frosts, earthquakes, and pestilences. Natural disasters and adverse weather conditions (including the potential effects of climate change) can lower crop yields and reduce crop size and crop quality, which in turn could reduce our supplies of Non-GMO and organic ingredients or increase the prices of Non-GMO and organic ingredients. If our supplies of Non-GMO and organic ingredients are reduced, we may not be able to find enough supplemental supply sources on favorable terms, if at all, which could impact our ability to supply product to our customers and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We also compete with other manufacturers in the procurement of Non-GMO and organic product ingredients, which may be less plentiful in the open market than conventional product ingredients. This competition may increase in the future if consumer demand for Non-GMO and organic products increases. This could cause our expenses to increase or could limit the amount of product that we can manufacture and sell.
Adverse weather conditions, fires, natural disasters, crop disease, pests and other natural conditions can impose significant costs and losses on our business.
Agricultural products are vulnerable to adverse weather conditions, including severe rains, drought and temperature extremes, floods, and windstorms, which are quite common but difficult to predict. Agricultural products also are vulnerable to crop disease and to pests, which may vary in severity and effect, depending on the stage of production at the time of infection or infestation, the type of treatment applied and climatic conditions. Unfavorable growing conditions caused by these factors can reduce both crop size and crop quality and, in extreme cases, entire harvests may be lost. Additionally, as of December 31, 2025, because approximately 72% of our inventory was concentrated in one geographical area by co-manufacturing and third-party logistics partners, adverse weather, or natural disasters, including fires, earthquakes, winter storms, droughts, or volcanic events could result in significant costs and meaningfully reduce our capacity to fulfill orders and maintain normal business operations. These factors may result in lower sales volume and increased costs due increased costs of products. Incremental costs, including transportation, may also be incurred if we need to find alternate short-term supplies of products from alternative areas. These factors can increase costs, decrease revenues and lead to additional charges to earnings, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Climate change may negatively affect our business and operations.
There is concern that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may have an adverse impact on global temperatures, weather patterns and the frequency and severity of extreme weather and natural disasters. In the event that such climate change has a negative effect on agricultural productivity, we may be subject to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for certain commodities that are necessary for our products, such as coconut milk powder, organic coconut sugar, organic extra virgin coconut oil and freeze-dried coconut water. As a result of climate change, we may also be subjected to decreased availability of water, deteriorated quality of water or less favorable pricing for water, which could adversely impact our manufacturing and distribution operations, as well as the agricultural businesses of our suppliers, which rely on the availability and quality of water.
We rely on a small number of suppliers to provide our raw materials, and our supply chain may be interrupted and prevent us from obtaining the necessary materials we need to operate.
We rely on suppliers and vendors to meet our high-quality standards and supply products in a timely and efficient manner. Although we work with multiple suppliers for each of our key raw materials, there is no assurance that quality natural and organic products will continue to be available to meet our specific and growing needs. This may be due to, among other reasons, problems with our suppliers’ and vendors’ businesses, finances, labor relations, ability to export materials, international shipping delays, product quality issues, costs, production, crop yields, insurance, and reputation, as well as disease outbreaks or pandemics, acts of war, terrorism, natural disasters, fires, earthquakes, flooding or other catastrophic occurrences. If for any reason our suppliers or vendors became unable or unwilling to continue to provide services to us, this would likely lead to a temporary interruption in our ability to import our products until we found another entity that could provide these services. Failure to find a suitable replacement, even on a temporary basis, would have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our current production targets, make it difficult to grow and would hurt our results of operations.
In addition, our top suppliers are in a similar geographic area, which increases the risk of significant supply disruptions from local and regional events. In the event that our supply from our current suppliers is interrupted, our operations may be interrupted resulting in lost revenue, added costs and distribution delays that could harm our business and customer relationships until we are able to identify and enter into an agreement with one or more alternative suppliers. As a result of this concentration in our supply chain, our business and operations would be negatively affected if any of our key suppliers were to experience significant disruption affecting the price, quality, availability, or timely delivery of their products. In the event that our supply from our current suppliers is interrupted, our operations may be interrupted resulting in lost revenue, added costs such as, without limitation, shipping costs, and distribution delays that could harm our business and customer relationships until we are able to identify and enter into an agreement with one or more alternative suppliers.
Our future results of operations may be adversely affected by volatile commodity costs.
Many aspects of our business could be directly affected by volatile commodity costs. Agricultural commodities and raw materials, including coconut milk powder, organic coconut sugar, organic extra virgin coconut oil, and freeze-dried coconut water. These items, as well as a growing list of new ingredients as we expand our product portfolio, are subject to price volatility which can be caused by commodity market fluctuations, inflation, crop yields, seasonal cycles, weather conditions (including the potential effects of climate change), temperature extremes and natural disasters (including floods, droughts, water scarcity, frosts, earthquakes and hurricanes), pest and disease problems, changes in currency exchange rates, imbalances between supply and demand, natural disasters and government programs and policies among other factors. Volatile fuel costs translate into unpredictable costs for the products and services we receive from our third-party providers including, but not limited to, distribution costs for our products and packaging costs. While we may seek to offset the volatility of such costs with a combination of cost savings initiatives, operating efficiencies, and price increases to our customers, we may be unable to manage cost volatility. If we are unable to fully offset the volatility of such costs, our financial results could be adversely affected.
We rely on our founders, Laird Hamilton and Gabrielle Reece.
Many of the Company’s current products and planned future products are based on the lifestyle of Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece. Pursuant to the License and Preservation Agreement, dated May 26, 2020, by and among Mr. Hamilton, Ms. Reece and the Company, Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece granted us a limited, exclusive license to use their respective images, signatures, voices and names (other than those owned by the Company), rights of publicity and common law and statutory rights to the foregoing. Any use of the licensed property that is in accordance with the historical standard of use and is not objected to by Mr. Hamilton or Ms. Reece within 30 days of the first intra-company disclosure of a bona-fide intent to make such use is deemed approved. Any new use of the licensed property shall satisfy the historical standard of use and shall be primarily directed to the advertising, promotion or marketing of the Company’s products and services. If Mr. Hamilton or Ms. Reece object to a proposed use of the licensed property, the Company may be prevented from implementing our business plan in a timely manner, or at all, outside of previously approved usages or usages consistent with certain pre-approved product guidelines. Also, the Company depends on the positive image and public popularity of Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece to maintain and increase brand recognition. Customers may be drawn to our products because of their involvement in our Company as celebrities. If Mr. Hamilton or Ms. Reece’s image, reputation or popularity is materially and adversely affected, this could negatively affect the marketability and sales of our products and the Company.
Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece may engage in outside business activities from time to time, including the XPT Extreme Performance Training brand, Laird Apparel, and various endorsement opportunities. These activities may interfere with the respective time and attention Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece can devote to the Company’s business and affairs, which could have a material and adverse effect on the business. We have also entered into limited non-competition and non-solicitation agreements with Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece, which makes us vulnerable to competition from them. These conflicts of interest may result in the loss of business opportunities, which may materially and adversely affect our prospects, business advantage, financial condition, and results of operations.
If the reputation of our brand erodes significantly, it could have a material impact on our results of operations.
Our financial success is directly dependent on the consumer perception of our brand. The success of our brand may suffer if our marketing plans or product initiatives do not have the desired impact on our brand’s image or its ability to attract consumers. Further, our results could be negatively affected if our brand suffers substantial damage to its reputation due to real or perceived quality issues, adverse publicity about our products, packaging or ingredients, our failure to maintain the quality of our products, the failure of our products to deliver consistently positive consumer experiences, the products becoming unavailable to consumers, or perception that the Company or any of its executives or Mr. Hamilton or Ms. Reece is perceived to act in an irresponsible or objectionable manner. In addition, it is possible for such information, misperceptions, and opinions to be shared quickly and disseminated widely due to the continued growing use of social and digital media. Negative posts or comments about the Company or any of its executives or Mr. Hamilton or Ms. Reece, or our products or packaging on social or digital media could seriously damage our brands and reputation.
We rely on retailers and distributors for a substantial portion of our sales, and our failure to maintain and further develop our sales channels could harm our business.
We sell a substantial portion of our products through retailers such as Costco, through distributors such as United Natural Foods, Inc. and KeHE Distributors, and online through Amazon, and we depend on these third parties to sell our products to consumers.
The loss of, or business disruption at, one or more of these retailers or distributors or a negative change in our relationship with Costco or Amazon or a disruption to Amazon as a sales channel could have a material adverse effect on our business. If we do not maintain our relationship with existing retailers and distributors or develop relationships with new retailers and distributors, the growth of our business may be adversely affected, and our business may be harmed.
We are not the exclusive seller of our products into e-commerce channels, such as Amazon, and face competition in that channel from resellers of our products. Further, the terms of our agreements with these distributors allow us to plan for the future, maintain growth and strengthen our relationships with key customers. If we are required to obtain additional or alternative distribution agreements or arrangements in the future, we cannot be certain that we will be able to do so on satisfactory terms or in a timely manner. Our inability to enter into satisfactory distribution agreements may inhibit our ability to implement our business plan or to establish markets necessary to expand the distribution of our products successfully.
We depend upon internet search engines and other providers of digital advertising to attract a significant portion of our potential customers to our websites, and any change in the prominence of our website in either paid or algorithmic search result listings or an increase in purchasing digital ads could cause the number of visitors to our websites and our revenue to decline.
We depend in significant part on various internet search engines, such as Google, and other providers of digital advertising to direct a significant number of potential customers to our websites. Search websites typically provide two types of search results, algorithmic and paid listings. Algorithmic, or organic, listings are determined and displayed solely by a set of formulas designed by search companies. Paid listings can be purchased and then are displayed if particular words are included in a user’s internet search. Placement in paid listings is generally not determined solely on the bid price but also takes into account the search engines’ assessment of the quality of the website featured in the paid listing and other factors. We rely on both algorithmic and paid search results, as well as digital advertising on other websites and through other providers, to direct a substantial share of the visitors to our websites.
Our ability to maintain the number of visitors to our websites from internet search websites and other websites is not entirely within our control. For example, internet search websites frequently revise their algorithms in an attempt to optimize their search result listings or to implement their internal standards and strategies. Changes in the algorithms could cause our websites to receive less favorable placements, which could reduce the number of users who visit our websites. We have experienced and continue to experience fluctuations in the search result rankings for our websites.
In addition, the prominence of the placement of our advertisements is in part determined by the amount we are willing to pay for the advertisement. We bid against our competitors for the display of paid search engine advertisements and some of our competitors have greater resources with which to bid and better brand recognition than we have. Additionally, as we increase the number of third-party distributors of our products, they have occasionally targeted similar individuals or use similar key words. If competition for the display of paid advertisements in response to search terms related to our online services increases, our online advertising expenses could rise significantly, and we may be required to reduce the number of our paid search advertisements. If we reduce our advertising with search engines, our consumer traffic may significantly decline, or we may be unable to maintain a cost-effective search engine marketing program.
Other factors, such as search engine technical difficulties, search engine technical changes and technical or presentation changes we make to our websites, could also cause our websites to be listed less prominently in algorithmic search results. Any adverse effect on the placement of our websites in search engine results could reduce the number of users who visit our websites and drive up the cost of customer acquisition. If visits to our websites decrease, our revenue may decline, and we may need to resort to more costly sources to acquire new customers and such decreased revenue and/or increased expense could materially and adversely affect our business and profitability.
Our customer acquisition costs may increase, and our customer lifetime values may decrease, harming our margins and results.
Our business is dependent upon the success of our sales and customer acquisition and retention strategies, and our marketing efforts are focused on building our brand and acquiring new customers. As our business grows, our marketing dollars may become less effective as we run out of sources of free or low-cost traffic to our websites and are compelled to use less proprietary and more competitive sources of customer acquisition. In addition, customers acquired through more competitive channels may have lower retention rates compared to customers acquired through low-cost channels such as the social media presences of Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece, leading to lower customer lifetime values. To the extent our customer acquisition costs increase, or our lifetime customer values decrease, our margins and results of operations will be harmed.
Our customers generally are not obligated to continue purchasing products from us.
Many of our customers are individuals that buy from us under purchase orders, and we generally do not have long-term agreements with or commitments from these customers for the purchase of products. We cannot provide assurance that our customers, including customers who participate in our subscription programs, will maintain or increase their sales volumes or orders for the products supplied by us or that we will be able to maintain or add to our existing customer base. Decreases in our customers’ sales volumes or orders for products supplied by us may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Our financial success depends on our ability to successfully predict changes in consumer preferences and develop successful new products and marketing strategies in response.
Consumer preferences evolve over time and the success of our products depends on our ability to identify the tastes and dietary habits of consumers and to offer products that appeal to their preferences and address their concerns. We must also adapt our marketing strategies to these fluid consumer preferences as they develop. Recent trends in consumer preferences that may impact us include:
dietary trends and increased attention to nutritional values, such as sugar, fat, protein, fiber, carbohydrate, or calorie content;
concerns about obesity and the health effects of specific ingredients and nutrients, such as sugar and other sweeteners, ingredients derived from genetically modified organisms (“GMOs”), gluten, grains, dairy, soybeans, nuts, oils, vitamins, fiber, and minerals; and
increasing awareness of the environmental and social effects of product production, including agricultural production by food manufacturers and their suppliers.
The development and introduction of new products could require substantial research and development and other expenditures, including capital investment and marketing and warehouse slotting investments. In addition, the success of our innovation and product development efforts depends upon our ability to anticipate changes in consumers’ preferences, the technical capability of our research and development staff in developing, formulating, and testing new products, and our ability to introduce the resulting products in a timely manner. If our products fail to meet consumer preferences, or we fail to introduce new and improved products on a timely basis, then the return on that investment will be less than anticipated and our strategy to grow sales and profits through product innovations and extensions will be less successful.
Consumer preferences for natural and organic food products are difficult to predict and may change.
Our business is primarily focused on sales of non-GMO, organic and natural products, and our success depends, in part, on our ability to offer products that anticipate the tastes and dietary habits of consumers and appeal to their preferences on a timely and affordable basis. A significant shift in consumer demand away from our products or our failure to maintain our current market position, could reduce our sales and harm our business. Consumer trends change based on a number of possible factors, including nutritional values, a change in consumer preferences or general economic conditions. Additionally, there is a growing focus among some consumers to buy local food products in an attempt to reduce the carbon footprint associated with transporting food products from longer distances, which could result in a decrease in the demand for food products and ingredients that we import from other countries or transport from remote processing locations or growing regions. Further, failures by us or our competitors to deliver quality products could erode consumer trust in the organic certification of foods. A significant shift in consumer demand away from our products would reduce our market share, harming our business.
Technology failures or security breaches could disrupt our operations and negatively impact our business.
In the normal course of business, we rely on information technology systems to process, transmit, and store electronic information. For example, our production and distribution facilities and inventory management utilize information technology to increase efficiencies and limit costs. Information technology systems are also integral to the reporting of our results of operations. Furthermore, a significant portion of the communications between, and storage of personal data of, our personnel, customers, and suppliers depend on information technology, including social media platforms.
Our information technology systems may be vulnerable to a variety of interruptions, as a result of our enterprise platform or due to events beyond our control, including, but not limited to, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, hackers, cyber-attacks, and other security issues. These events could compromise our confidential information, impede, or interrupt our business operations, and may result in other negative consequences, including remediation costs, loss of revenue, litigation, and reputational damage. Furthermore, if a breach or other breakdown results in disclosure of confidential or personal information, we may suffer reputational, competitive and/or business harm.
While we have implemented administrative and technical controls, maintained information security training programs, perpetuated external reviews, and taken other preventive actions to reduce the risk of cyber incidents and protect our information technology, they may be insufficient to prevent physical and electronic break-ins, cyber-attacks, ransomware attacks, or other security breaches to our computer systems, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Similarly, while we currently maintain insurance that is intended to cover security and information system incidents, the insurance may not cover all or any of the losses, types of claims, damages to our brand, or damages to our reputation due to the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the event, and such insurance may not remain available on advantageous terms or at all.
Economic downturns could limit consumer demand for our products and negatively affect our sales and profitability.
The premium organic and natural food industry is sensitive to national and regional economic conditions and the demand for the products that we distribute may be adversely affected from time to time by economic downturns that impact consumer spending, including discretionary spending. Future economic conditions such as employment levels, business conditions, housing starts, interest rates, inflation rates, energy and fuel costs and tax rates could reduce consumer spending or change consumer purchasing habits. Among these changes could be a reduction in the number of natural and organic products that consumers purchase where there are non-organic alternatives, given that many premium natural and organic products, and particularly premium natural and organic foods, often have higher retail prices than do their non-organic counterparts.
Adverse developments affecting the financial services industry, such as recent bank failures or concerns involving liquidity, may have a material effect on the Company’s operations.
Actual events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional counterparties or other companies in the financial services industry or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any events of these kinds or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems.
Regulatory Risks
Our products and operations are subject to government regulation and oversight both in the United States and abroad, and our failure to comply with applicable requirements could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
We are affected by a wide range of governmental laws and regulations. Examples of regulatory agencies influencing our operations include the USDA, the FDA, the FTC, and the EPA, among others. These agencies regulate, among other things, with respect to our products and operations:
design, development and manufacturing;
testing, labeling, content, and language of instructions for use and storage;
product safety and ingredients;
marketing, sales, and distribution;
record keeping procedures;
advertising and promotion;
recalls and corrective actions; and
product import and export.
These laws and regulations affect various aspects of our business. For example, certain food ingredient products manufactured by Laird Superfood are regulated under the FDCA, as administered by the FDA. Under the FDCA, pre-marketing approval by the FDA is required for the sale of a food ingredient which is a food additive unless the substance is generally recognized as safe, under the conditions of its intended use by qualified experts in food safety. We believe that most food ingredients in our products are generally recognized as safe. However, this status cannot be determined for some ingredients until actual formulations and uses are finalized. As a result, we may be adversely affected if the FDA determines that our food ingredient products do not meet the criteria for generally recognized as safe. Food and beverage products that contain unapproved ingredients that are not generally recognized as safe may be considered to be adulterated under the FDCA, which could result in market withdrawal or recall of such product or other enforcement actions. There is increasing government and public scrutiny on food additives and ingredients, and it is possible that the regulations governing the ingredients in our products could change, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
The regulations to which we are subject are complex and have tended to become more stringent over time. The 2025 change in presidential administration and related changes in regulatory agency personnel and policies are leading to increased uncertainty for us and other regulated industry stakeholders. Ahead of the 2025 administration change, FDA released several new regulations, guidance documents and proposed rules that the new administration may or may not adopt, some of which are or may be relevant to our business. For example, FDA proposed a rule on January 16, 2025, that would require certain nutrition information to be included on front-of-package on majority of food products if finalized. In addition to compliance costs associated with understanding the requirements and revising labeling, implementing this rule could adversely affect our consumer perception of our products, reputation, and brand and decrease our sales, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Overall, regulatory changes could result in restrictions on our ability to carry on or expand our operations, higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales. The failure to comply with applicable regulations could jeopardize our ability to sell our products and result in enforcement actions and third-party lawsuits such as:
warning letters;
fines;
injunctions;
civil penalties and civil lawsuits;
termination or disruption of manufacture and distribution;
voluntary or mandatory recalls or seizures of products;
delays in the introduction of products into the market; and
total or partial suspension of production.
Any of these sanctions could result in higher than anticipated costs or lower than anticipated sales and harm our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations. We may also be required to take corrective actions, such as reformulating, or relabeling our products, or taking other actions, which could require us to make substantial capital expenditures. In addition, we could be required to indemnify our employees in connection with any expenses or liabilities that they may incur individually in connection with regulatory action against them. As a result, our future business prospects could deteriorate due to regulatory constraints, and our profitability could be impaired by our obligation to provide such indemnification to our employees.
The FDA may also take issue with the name “Laird Superfood” or any derivative name, as “superfood” is, to our knowledge, still undefined by regulatory agencies. In addition to any regulatory costs, if the Company were required to change its name, there would likely be, or could be, among other results, a negative effect on the Company’s branding and customer perception.
Regulatory enforcement concerning marketing and labeling of food or dietary supplement products could adversely affect our business and reputation.
Products that we sell carry claims as to their origin, ingredients, or health benefits, including, by way of example, the use of the term “natural,” “functional,” or “healthy,” or similar synonyms or implied statements relating to such benefits. Although the FDA and the USDA each has issued statements regarding the appropriate use of the word “natural,” there is no single, United States government regulated definition of the term “natural” for use in the food industry, which is true for many other adjectives common in the better-for-you and functionally focused food industry. The resulting uncertainty has led to consumer confusion, distrust, and legal challenges. Plaintiffs have commenced legal actions against several food companies that market “natural” products, asserting false, misleading, and deceptive advertising and labeling claims, including claims related to genetically modified ingredients, preservatives, allegedly synthetic ingredients, contaminants such as heavy metals or microplastics, environmental impact, and other claims. In limited circumstances, the FDA has taken regulatory action against products labeled “natural” but that nonetheless contain synthetic ingredients or components. Should we become subject to similar claims, consumers may avoid purchasing products from us or seek alternatives, even if the basis for the claim is unfounded. Adverse publicity about these matters may discourage consumers from buying our products. The cost of defending against any such claims could be significant. Any loss of confidence on the part of consumers in the truthfulness of our labeling or ingredient claims would be difficult and costly to overcome and may significantly reduce our brand value. Any of these events could adversely affect our reputation and brand and decrease our sales, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In December 2024, FDA promulgated a revised definition of “healthy” when used as an implied nutrient content claim. As it stands, food manufacturers and brands must achieve compliance with the new rule by February 25, 2028, which may require us to revise our product labels and other materials that may be considered labeling to revise or remove related claims.
Similarly, certain USDA regulations set forth the minimum standards producers must meet in order to have their products labeled as “certified organic,” and we currently manufacture several organic products that are covered by these regulations. While we believe our products and our supply chain are in compliance with these regulations, changes to food regulations may increase our costs to remain in compliance. We could lose our “organic” certification if a facility becomes contaminated with non-organic ingredients, if we do not use raw materials that are certified organic, or if key ingredients used in our products are no longer allowed to be used in food certified as “organic.” The loss of our “organic” certifications and subsequent ineligibility period could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
In addition, the USDA requires disclosure of the use of genetic engineering in manufacturing a product or an ingredient used in a product. We believe we are in material compliance with the mandatory bioengineering food disclosure standard. If the USDA determines our practices are inconsistent with the bioengineering disclosure regulations, it may be necessary to make changes in our labeling and we could face enforcement actions, either or both of which could adversely affect customer acceptance of our product and materially and adversely affect our business.
Our reputation could suffer from real or perceived issues involving regulatory enforcement or litigation concerning the marketing or labeling of our products.
The marketing and labeling of any food product in recent years has brought increased risk that consumers will bring class action lawsuits and that the FTC and/or state attorneys general will bring legal action concerning the truth and accuracy of the marketing and labeling of the product. Examples of causes of action that may be asserted in a consumer class action lawsuit include fraud, unfair trade practices and breach of state consumer protection statutes. The FTC and/or state attorneys general may bring legal action that seeks removal of a product from the marketplace and impose fines and penalties. Even when unmerited, class claims, action by the FTC or state attorneys general enforcement actions can be expensive to defend and adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and consumers and our corporate and brand image, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Additionally, we may have to enter settlement agreements to resolve such claims, even when unmerited, which could result in restrictions to our product offering, labeling, or advertising in addition to a sizeable cash payment or other remedies sought by the plaintiffs.
In addition, the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc. (“NAD”) administers a self-regulatory program of the advertising industry to ensure truth and accuracy in national advertising. NAD both monitors national advertising and entertains inquiries and challenges from competing companies and consumers. Investigations may require advertisers to demonstrate to NAD that the claim(s) at issue are properly substantiated. Should our advertising be determined to be false or misleading, we may have to pay damages, revise, or withdraw our campaign and possibly face fines or sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our sales and operating results
We may be subject to specific FTC endorsement and/or testimonial regulations that would interfere with our advertising, marketing, and labeling strategies.
The FTC regulates the use of endorsements and testimonials in advertising as well as relationships between advertisers and social media influencers pursuant to principles described in the FTC’s Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising (the “Endorsement Guides”). The Endorsement Guides provide that an endorsement must reflect the honest opinion of the endorser and cannot be used to make a claim about a product that the product’s marketer could not itself legally make. They also say that if there is a connection between an endorser and the marketer that consumers would not expect and it would affect how consumers evaluate the endorsement, that connection should be disclosed. Another principle in the Endorsement Guides applies to ads that feature endorsements from people who achieved exceptional, or even above average, results from using a product. If the advertiser doesn’t have proof that the endorser’s experience represents what people will generally achieve using the product as described in the ad, then an ad featuring that endorser must make clear to the audience what results they can generally expect to achieve, and the advertiser must have a reasonable basis for its representations regarding those generally expected results.
Although the Endorsement Guides are advisory in nature and do not operate directly with the force of law, they provide guidance about what the FTC staff generally believes the Federal Trade Commission Act, or FTC Act, requires in the context using of endorsements and testimonials in advertising and any practices inconsistent with the Endorsement Guides can result in violations of the FTC Act’s proscription against unfair and deceptive practices.
To the extent we may rely on endorsements or testimonials, we will review any relevant relationships for compliance with the Endorsement Guides and we will otherwise endeavor to follow the FTC Act and other legal standards applicable to our advertising. While we do request that public persons who we engage as paid advertisers, or provide samples of product to, disclose their relationship with us prior to sharing on social media or other endorsement, we cannot ensure all recipients comply with this request and we cannot completely monitor what they post on social media. If our advertising claims or claims made by our social media influencers or by other endorsers with whom we have a material connection do not comply with the Endorsement Guides or any requirement of the FTC Act or similar state requirements, the FTC and state consumer protection authorities could subject us to investigations and enforcement actions, impose penalties, require us to pay monetary consumer redress, require us to revise our marketing materials and require us to accept burdensome injunctions, all of which could harm our business, reputation, financial condition and results of operations.
We have continually adapted our marketing efforts to be compliant with the Endorsement Guides, as they are periodically revised. However, it is possible that our use, and that of our employees, of testimonials in the advertising and promotion of our products could be significantly impacted by enforcement or litigation, which might negatively affect our sales.
We may face scrutiny from evolving state regulations concerning health, safety, our supply chain, and marketing.
In addition to the federal regulatory issues listed above, there are a growing number of state regulations that might impair our ability to operate and avoid interruption. For example, California currently enforces legislation commonly referred to as “Proposition 65” that requires that “clear and reasonable” warnings be given to consumers who are exposed to chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity. Although we seek to comply with the requirements of Proposition 65, as well as to educate our customers regarding the substance of Proposition 65 and the relative metals contents in various natural foods, there can be no assurance that we will not be adversely affected by litigation or other actions relating to Proposition 65 or future legislation that is similar or related thereto.
A growing number of states have also adopted or proposed legislation restricting certain ingredients and food additives. A few states have also adopted or proposed restrictions prohibiting the sale of certain dietary supplements to customers under a certain age. These examples indicate an overall trend toward state involvement in detailed aspects of food and dietary supplement regulation, which may increase our cost of maintaining compliance in all states where our products are sold, and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Also, the Transparency in Supply Chains Act of 2010 in California requires us to audit our vendors with respect to risks of human trafficking and slavery and mitigate these risks in our operations. Any failure to disclose issues or other non-compliance could subject us to action by the California Attorney General or other regulatory authorities. Increased compliance costs associated with operating in California and other states could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Relating to the Ownership of Our Common Stock
Sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock, including shares issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock, could depress our stock price.
Our historic stockholders may decide to reduce their investment in our Company as a result of the changes to our business in connection with the Navitas Acquisition. These sales of our common stock (or the perception that these sales may occur) could have the effect of depressing the market price for our common stock. In addition, our financial position may differ from our financial position before the completion of the Transactions, and our results of operations and/or cash flows may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting our results of operations and/or cash flows, all of which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. Furthermore, the stock market generally, and our common stock specifically, have experienced significant price and volume fluctuations recently, which, if such fluctuations continue to occur, could have a material adverse effect on the market for, or liquidity of, our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.
Based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of March 23, 2026, following the issuance of the Initial Shares, Nexus holds Series A Preferred Stock convertible into 56.2% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock (or 73.9% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock assuming the issuance of the Additional Shares). As a holder of Series A Preferred Stock, Nexus generally has voting rights as set forth in the Certificate of Designation of the Series A Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designation”). The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of common stock at a fixed conversion price of $3.57, subject to certain customary anti-dilution adjustments. In addition, on March 12, 2026, we entered into a Registration Rights Agreement with Nexus (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), pursuant to which, among other things, we are obligated to use our reasonable best efforts to prepare and file a registration statement registering the resale of the Conversion Shares. Once registered, the Conversion Shares held by Nexus generally will not require further registration under the Securities Act, provided, however, because Nexus is deemed to be our affiliate for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), its sales of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock will be subject to the resale restrictions of Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Any such sale (or the perception that any such a sale may occur), coupled with the increase in the outstanding number of shares of our common stock following the conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock upon transfer, may affect the market for, and the market price of, shares of common stock in an adverse manner.
The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you purchased them.
The market price of our common stock has fluctuated and may fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:
overall performance of the equity markets;
the development and sustainability of an active trading market for our common stock;
our ability to maintain our listing on the NYSE American;
our operating performance and the performance of other similar companies, or companies in the premium organic and natural food industry;
changes in recommendations by securities analysts that elect to follow the Company;
press releases or other public announcements by us or others, including our filings with the SEC;
changes in expectations related to consumer preferences in the premium organic and natural food industry;
recruitment or departure of key personnel;
changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of debt or equity securities;
regulatory developments in the United States or foreign countries;
the economy as a whole, market conditions in our industry, and the industries of our customers;
the expiration of market standoff or contractual lock-up agreements; and
the size of our market float.
In addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many small-cap companies. Stock prices of many small-cap companies have fluctuated in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. These extreme market fluctuations have been accompanied by reports of strong and atypical retail investor interest, including on social media and online forums, and it is unclear how long this volatility will last. Due to our customer basis, online presence, and founders’ reputation, among other factors, our stock may be subject to similar market volatility in the future not necessarily related to the performance of our business. In the past, shareholders have filed securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, it could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from our business, and adversely affect our business.
We will incur increased costs in connection with operating as a public company and our management will be required to devote substantial time to compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.
As a public company, we may incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the listing requirements of the NYSE American and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on public companies. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to compliance with these requirements. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock depends in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us and our business. If analysts cease coverage of us, the trading price for our common stock would be negatively affected. If one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our common stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price for our common stock would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common stock could decrease, which might cause the price and trading volume for our common stock to decline.
We may not be able to maintain a listing of our common stock on the NYSE American.
Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE American. We must meet certain financial and liquidity criteria to maintain the listing of our common stock on the NYSE American. If we fail to meet any listing standards or if we violate any listing requirements, our common stock may be delisted. A delisting of our common stock from the NYSE American may materially impair our shareholders’ ability to buy and sell our common stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our common stock. The delisting of our common stock could significantly impair our ability to raise capital and the value of your investment.
Economic and business factors could result in impairment of intangible assets.
Current and future economic conditions, as well as the other risks noted in this Item 1A, may adversely impact our ability to attract new customers, retain existing customers, maintain sales volumes, and maintain margins. As discussed under “Critical Accounting Estimates” included elsewhere in this report, these events could materially reduce our profitability and cash flows which could, in turn, lead to impairment of our intangible assets. Furthermore, significant negative industry or general economic, market or other trends, disruptions to our business and unexpected significant changes or planned changes in our use of intangible assets. Any future impairment could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations.
Provisions in our governing documents under Nevada law could discourage a takeover that shareholders may consider favorable.
Provisions in our articles of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control or changes in our management. These provisions include the following:
authorizing the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that could be issued by our board of directors (the “Board”) to defend against a takeover attempt;
providing that vacancies on our Board, including newly created directorships, may be filled only by a majority vote of directors then in office rather than by shareholders;
advance notice procedures, which may apply for shareholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of shareholders;
no authorization of cumulative voting, which limits the ability of minority shareholders to elect director candidates;
certain amendments to our articles of incorporation require the approval of two-thirds of the then outstanding voting power of our capital stock;
In addition, we are subject to Nevada’s Combination with Interested Shareholders Statute (Nevada Revised Statutes 74.411 - 74.444), which prohibits an interested stockholder from entering into a combination with the corporation, unless certain conditions are met. These provisions are expected to discourage certain types of coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids and to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of our company to first negotiate with our Board. These provisions may delay or prevent someone from acquiring or merging with us, which may cause the market price of our common stock to decline. Additionally, Nexus has consent rights over certain corporate actions. For more information, see the risk factor titled “Nexus has certain limited consent rights that could prevent us from taking certain corporate actions.”
Since we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our capital stock in the foreseeable future, stock price appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gain.
We currently intend to retain all our future earnings, if any, to finance the growth and development of our business. In addition, the terms of any future debt agreements may preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, appreciation, if any, in the market price of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.
Our articles of incorporation provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the federal district courts of the United States of America will be the exclusive forums for substantially all disputes between us and our shareholders, which could limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.
Despite being a Nevada corporation, our articles of incorporation include a provision that provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for:
any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf;
This provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the U.S. federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.
In addition, our articles of incorporation provide that the federal district courts of the United States will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum. This exclusive forum provision does not apply to claims under the Exchange Act.
These exclusive forum provisions may limit a shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or other employees, which may discourage these types of lawsuits. Furthermore, the enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’ governing documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and it is possible that a court could find these types of provisions to be inapplicable or unenforceable. If a court were to find the exclusive forum provision contained in our articles of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY.
Risk Management, Strategy, and Governance
Our enterprise-wide cybersecurity strategy, policy, standards, architecture, and processes are led by a dedicated, outsourced Chief Information Officer, in collaboration with outside cybersecurity partners, is responsible for leading enterprise-wide cybersecurity strategy, policy, standards, architecture, and processes. Qualified third-party service providers are tasked with developing, implementing, and executing that strategy. These third parties play a key role in our cybersecurity risk assessment and management processes, as we rely on their cybersecurity experience and expertise to assess, identify, and manage emerging trends and risks from cybersecurity threats on an ongoing basis.
Our cybersecurity policies are focused on ensuring the security and protection of our systems, networks, and proprietary data, which includes trade secrets, intellectual property, corporate strategic plans, marketing plans, material non-public financial information, and personally identifiable information, such as employee and customer information. We also actively engage with key vendors as part of our continuing efforts to actively monitor system access, identify and quarantine potential cybersecurity threats, to assess and implement cybersecurity systems and tools, and to enhance the effectiveness of our information security policies and procedures.
Cybersecurity risk management processes are one component of our overall risk assessment process whereby, on an ongoing basis, we analyze our internal control environment and consider how threats to the business might circumvent those controls. These processes include control over and segregation of user access to key systems, monitoring of any user access anomalies, active monitoring of emerging trends in the broader market, timely identification and quarantine of any potential cybersecurity incidents, evaluation of our operations and business needs and how executing on those needs translates to potential threats, and training of end users to mitigate the likelihood of user error.
We assess materiality of cybersecurity incidents based on the type of breach, whether any information was accessed, the nature of the information accessed, and the potential for business interruption. As of the date of this report, we are not aware of any material incidents from cybersecurity threats that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company, including our business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
We currently do not own any real property. We sublease our corporate headquarters at 5303 Spine Road, Suite 204, Boulder, Colorado, 80301. The term of the lease extends through July 1, 2027. We believe our leased space is adequate for our current needs and that suitable additional or substitute space would be available if needed.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
From time to time, we may be involved in claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. To our knowledge, there are no material pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which our property is the subject.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
Market Information
Our common stock is traded on the NYSE American Market under the symbol “LSF.”
Holders
As of March 23, 2026, there were 35 holders of record of our common stock. This number does not include beneficial owners whose shares are held by nominees in street name.
Dividend Policy
We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings, if any, to fund the growth and development of our business, and therefore we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination as to the declaration and payment of dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our Board, subject to compliance with contractual restrictions and covenants in the agreements governing our current and future indebtedness. Any such determination will also depend upon our business prospects, results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements and availability and other factors that our Board may deem relevant.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
There were no sales of unregistered securities during the year ended December 31, 2025 that were not previously reported on a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or a Current Report on Form 8-K.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025.
ITEM 6. [RESERVED].
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Form 10-K”). This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed below. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those identified below and those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Laird Superfood develops and markets great-tasting, high-quality food and beverage products designed to support health, convenience, and everyday use. Our product portfolio emphasizes natural ingredients, nutrient density, and functional attributes, and includes offerings that incorporate adaptogens and other functional ingredients commonly associated with supporting stress management, energy, mental focus, and overall wellness. Our primary products include: (i) coffee creamers, (ii) coffee, tea, and hot chocolate products, (iii) hydration and beverage enhancing products, and (iv) snacks and other food items. Following the Navitas Acquisition, our products now also include healthy baking products, wellness staples and functional snacks. Over the long term, we seek to build a widely recognized superfood brand grounded in authenticity, functionality, and a commitment to supporting a healthy and sustainable future for consumers and the environment. We generate revenue through two channels: e-commerce and wholesale.
Our e-commerce channel consists of (i) our Direct-to-consumer (“DTC”) business, which includes sales through lairdsuperfood.com and pickybars.com, and (ii) Amazon. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the e-commerce channel made up 50% and 59% of our net sales, respectively. Our websites offer an authentic brand experience for our consumers that drive engagement through educational content. These platforms also provide us with direct consumer feedback for future product development. We view our proprietary database of customers ordering directly from our website as a strategic asset as it enhances our ability to develop long-term relationships with these customers. We believe the content on our websites allows Laird Superfood to educate our consumers on the benefits of our products and ingredients, while providing a positive customer experience. We believe this experience leads to higher retention rates among repeat customers and subscribers, as evidenced by the fact that repeat customers and subscribers account for over 80% of DTC sales for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Net sales increased to 15% to $49.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2025, from $43.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Wholesale net sales the year ended December 31, 2025 increased by 41% compared to the same period in 2024 driven by velocity improvement and distribution expansion in grocery, as well as more efficient promotional spend. E-commerce channel sales for 2025 decreased by 3% year over year driven by softness in sales through our websites, offset in part by growth of sales through Amazon.
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, wholesale channel sales made up 50% and 41% of our net sales, respectively. Laird Superfood products are sold through various retail outlets, including conventional, natural and specialty grocery, and club. The diversity of our retail outlets represents a strong competitive advantage for Laird Superfood and provides us with a larger total addressable market than would be considered normal for a food brand that is singularly focused on the grocery market.
Recent Developments
The Navitas Acquisition
The Nexus Investment
On the Closing Date and concurrently with the closing of the Navitas Acquisition, we completed the transactions contemplated by that certain investment agreement, dated December 21, 2025 (the “Investment Agreement”), entered into by and among the Company, Gateway Superfood NSSIII Investment, LLC (“Gateway III”), and Gateway Superfood NSSIV Investment, LLC (“Gateway IV” and together with Gateway III, the “Investor”), with the Investor being an affiliate of Nexus Capital Management LP (“Nexus”), pursuant to which the Investor purchased an aggregate of 50,000 initial shares (the “Initial Shares”) of Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) at a purchase price of $1,000 per share for gross proceeds of $50.0 million at closing (the “Nexus Investment”). The net proceeds from the Nexus Investment were subsequently used to complete the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement (the Nexus Investment together with the Navitas Acquisition, the “Transactions”). For additional information regarding the Investment Agreement, see the information under the heading “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Board Appointments
We approved changes to our Board in connection with the Transactions. As of the Closing Date, the number of directors serving on the Board was increased to nine, and we appointed Doug Behrens, Michael Cohen, Kayla Dean Obia, and Kristin Patrick as representatives nominated by Nexus (the “Nexus Designees”), with Grant LaMontagne remaining on the Board and being considered the fifth Nexus Designee. In the future, the number of Nexus Representatives will adjust proportionately to Nexus’s ownership thresholds, subject to applicable law and stock exchange rules.
Key Factors Affecting our Future Performance
Ability to Grow Our Customer Base in both E-commerce and Traditional Wholesale Distribution Channels at a Reasonable Cost
We are continuously growing our customer base through both paid and organic e-commerce channels, as well as by expanding our presence in our wholesale channel through a variety of physical retail outlets and geographical regions. We typically attract new customers in our e-commerce channel through our direct websites, lairdsuperfood.com and pickybars.com, and through Amazon. We also seek to attract new e-commerce customers through paid and unpaid social media, search, display and traditional media. Our products are also sold through a growing number of retail outlets. Customers in our wholesale channel include grocery chains, natural food outlets, club stores, and food service customers. Attracting new customers in physical retail outlets depends on, among other things, paid promotions through retailers, display, and traditional media. We believe an ability to consistently attract and retain customers at a reasonable cost relative to projected life-time value will be a key factor affecting future performance.
Ability to Manage Co-Manufacturer and Third-Party Logistics Relationships
Our production and logistics are executed by third parties, and our performance is highly dependent on the ability of these partners to produce and deliver our products timely, to our standards, and at a reasonable cost.
Ability to Drive Repeat Usage of Our Products
Repeat customers who consistently re-order our products are critical to our business. The pace of our growth will be affected by our ability to maintain and establish long-term relationships with existing and new customers to drive repeat orders.
Ability to Expand Our Product Lines
Our goal is to expand our product lines over time to increase our growth opportunity and reduce product-specific risks through diversification into multiple products, each designed around daily use. Our pace of growth will be partially affected by the cadence and magnitude of new product launches over time.
Ability to Expand Gross Margins
Our overall profitability will be impacted by our ability to expand gross margins through effective sourcing of raw materials, controlling input and shipping costs, controlling the impacts of inflationary market factors, as well as managing co-packer relationships.
Ability to Expand Operating Margins
Our ability to expand operating margins will be impacted by our ability to cover fixed general and administrative costs and variable sales and marketing costs with higher revenues and gross profit dollars.
Ability to Manage Our Global Supply Chain
Our ability to grow and meet future demand will be affected by our ability to adequately plan for and source inventory from a variety of suppliers located inside and outside the United States. We may encounter difficulties in sourcing products.
Ability to Optimize Key Components of Working Capital
Our ability to maintain positive cash flows will be partially impacted by our ability to effectively manage all the key working capital components that could influence our cash conversion cycle.
Components of Results of Operations
We sell our products through two channels: wholesale and e-commerce. Through our wholesale channel, we sell our products indirectly to consumers through a broad set of retail outlets. Through our e-commerce channel, we derive revenue from the sale of our products directly to consumers through our direct websites, lairdsuperfood.com and pickybars.com, as well as third-party e-commerce platforms such as Amazon.
Cost of Goods Sold
Cost of goods sold includes the cost of raw materials and packaging, co-packing tolling fees, inbound and outbound freight costs, indirect labor, third party labor to store and ship our products, and overhead costs incurred in the storage and distribution of products sold in the period.
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses consist of general and administrative, research and product development, and sales and marketing expenses, including non-production personnel costs.
Income Taxes
Due to our history of operating losses and expectation of future operating losses, we do not expect any significant federal income tax expenses and benefits for the foreseeable future. We will continue to owe state and local income taxes.
Results of Operations
Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2025 (“FY2025”) and December 31, 2024 (“FY2024”)
The following table sets forth our results of operations for FY2025 and FY2024, and the percentage increase or decrease between the years presented:
Percent
Change
Cost of goods sold
Gross profit
Gross margin
General and administrative
Sales and marketing
Total operating expenses
Operating loss
Other income
Loss before income taxes
Income tax expense
Net loss
The increase in net sales in FY2025 was led by wholesale channel growth of 41% from FY2024, driven primarily by distribution expansion and velocity improvements in grocery and club. This was partially offset by softness in the DTC channel driven by lower new customer sales.
The increase in cost of goods sold in FY2025 was driven by growth in sales volume, as well as inflationary product costs and tariff costs.
Gross margin contracted to 37.9% in FY2025 from 40.9% in FY2024. The increase in gross profit in FY2025 was driven by sales volume growth, offset in part by increased procurement costs related to commodity cost inflation and tariffs which drove the gross margin contraction.
Operating expenses
General and administrative expense in FY2025 increased from FY2024 primarily driven by $0.7 million impairment charges related to long-lived intangible assets and $1.1 million of professional fees incurred in connection with the Navitas Acquisition. These increases were partially offset by reductions in ongoing general and administrative expenses, including insurance, dues and subscription fees, and professional fees relating to matters other than the Navitas Acquisition.
Sales and marketing expense in FY2025 increased from FY2024 driven primarily by increased investments in paid medial, advertising, and retail marketing initiatives, and, to a lesser extent, by higher selling fees resulting from increased sales volume.
Other income is composed of interest income and expense, rental income, and other non-operating gains and losses. The decrease in FY2025 as compared to FY2024 was primarily driven by declining interest rates and lower average cash balances held in our interest-bearing cash accounts.
Income tax expense consists of state and local income taxes. We owed no federal income taxes during FY2025 or FY2024, and we do not expect to pay federal income taxes in the near future due to our federal net operating loss carryforwards.
Cash Flows
The following table shows a summary of our cash flows for the periods presented:
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Cash flows used in operating activities in FY2025 were working capital driven; accounts receivable increased driven by the timing of large customer shipments at the end of the year which were collected in the first quarter of 2026, and inventory increased due to strategic investment early in the year to avoid anticipated tariff costs.
Cash used in investing activities consisted of purchases of property, plant, and equipment in FY2025 and FY2024.
Cash used in financing activities increased in fiscal year 2025 compared to fiscal year 2024 driven by increased payroll taxes withheld on net stock issuances. These net issuance withholdings, in both years, were offset in part by cash collected from stock option exercises, and fiscal year 2024 also included stock issuance costs incurred in connection with a Registration Statement on Form S-3 that was filed in FY2024.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2025, we had incurred accumulated net losses of $111.4 million, including operating losses of $3.4 million and $2.2 million for FY2025 and FY2024, respectively. We may incur additional operating losses as we execute our strategy to invest in the growth of our business, reinvesting any incremental profit into future top-line sales growth while holding cash reserves largely flat. We will continue to seek opportunities to optimize spending, expand gross margins, and free up cash flow through efficient working capital management. We have historically financed our operations and capital expenditures through private placements of our common stock, our initial public offering, our prior lines of credit, term loans, and from our core operating activities. Our historical uses of cash have primarily consisted of cash used in operating activities and working capital needs.
As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had $5.3 million and $8.5 million, respectively, of cash-on-hand. We had total net working capital of $11.1 million and $12.0 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We are party to the Factoring Agreement, pursuant to which we agreed to sell certain trade accounts receivable to the Purchaser from time to time. The Factoring Agreement provides for the Company to have access to up to $2.0 million on a revolving basis, measured by the aggregate amount advanced for the unpaid balance of all Purchased Accounts from time to time. The proceeds from the Factoring Agreement will be used to fund general working capital needs. As of December 31, 2025, we had access to $2.0 million of advances under the Factoring Agreement, of which none had been utilized.
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our growth rate, the timing and extent of spending to support research and development efforts, the continued expansion of sales and marketing activities, the enhancement of our product platforms, and the introduction of new products, and acquisition activity. Recent and expected working and other capital requirements, in addition to the above matters, also include the items described below:
The Company has a lease arrangement for corporate office space. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had fixed lease obligations of $0.2 million, of which $0.1 million is payable within the next twelve months.
As of December 31, 2025, $7.6 million of current liabilities were accrued related to short-term operating activities and personnel costs, excluding the current lease obligation mentioned above.
Advertising and marketing expenditures were $7.7 million in FY2025 and $6.7 million in FY2024. While we expect to continue to invest in these activities as part of the strategic expansion of sales volume, we will continue to optimize our marketing investments to reflect strategic shifts in spending and to improve the efficacy of future customer acquisition costs.
Following fiscal year end, on March 12, 2026, we completed the Transactions, pursuant to which (i) the Investor purchased the Initial Shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $1,000 per share for gross proceeds of $50.0 million at closing and (ii) the Company acquired Navitas for a purchase price of $38.5 million in cash, subject to customary purchase price adjustments, including a working capital adjustment. Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, the Company has the option, following the Closing Date until 270 days following the Closing Date (or, if on such 270th day the Company is engaged in discussions with one or more counterparties regarding a potential acquisition or other strategic transaction, 360 days), to require the Investor to purchase up to an aggregate of 60,000 additional shares of Series A Preferred Stock (the issuance of the Initial Shares and the Additional Shares, the “Preferred Stock Issuance”) at $1,000 per share, provided that any funding of Additional Shares must be for a minimum of $25.0 million and be used to fund substantially concurrent strategic transactions approved by a majority of the disinterested directors of the Board.
Among other things, the Transactions allow for opportunistic expansion of the Company’s product portfolio through potential strategic alternatives available to the Company, including potential mergers or acquisitions of other assets or entities that are synergistic to our business, and for increased financing opportunities, as the amount of the Company’s assets available to be used as collateral for future financing arrangements would be increased.
We continue to monitor macroeconomic trends and uncertainties such inflation of commodity costs, the effects of tariffs, and the potential imposition of modified or additional tariffs, which may have adverse effects on net sales and margins. As a result of the tariffs announced by the U.S. presidential administration, and potential tariff modifications or the imposition of tariffs or export controls by other countries, we have experienced some commodity cost volatility and anticipate that there could be increased supply chain challenges and consumer and economic uncertainty due to rapid changes in global trade policies in the future. Based on preliminary analysis of the potential effects of the announced tariffs and these other factors, we do not expect these factors to result in a material negative effect on our net sales or profitability in the near future. To date, we have elected to acquire additional inventory in advance of anticipated future tariff implementations, which has impacted our cash balances as of December 31, 2025, but which is not expected to meaningfully impact our cash balances long-term. However, we are continuing to evaluate these factors and their potential effects as well as our ability to potentially offset all or a portion of cost increases through pricing actions and cost savings efforts for fiscal year 2026 planning. Economic pressures on customers and consumers, including the challenges of high inflation and the effects of increased tariffs, may negatively affect our net sales and profitability in the future.
Based on our current business plans, we believe that our existing cash balances, including our anticipated cash flow from operations, will be sufficient to finance our operations and meet our foreseeable cash requirements through at least the next twelve months. In the future, we may raise funds by issuing debt or equity securities, or securities convertible into or exchangeable for our common stock. Such financing and other potential financing may result in dilution to shareholders, reduction in the market price of our common stock, imposition of debt covenants and repayment obligations, or other restrictions that may adversely affect our business. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. However, we may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such other arrangements when needed, on favorable terms, or at all.
We have no significant unused sources of liquid assets outside of our working capital, aside from any potential future proceeds from the issuance of the Additional Shares following the Nexus Investment.
Segment Information
We have one operating segment and one reportable segment, for which our Chief Operating Decision Maker, our Chief Executive Officer, reviews financial information on an aggregate basis for purposes of allocating resources and evaluating financial performance.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and the Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and operating results require the Company’s management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. Note 1, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue for the sale of our product at the point in time when our performance obligation has been satisfied and control of the product has transferred to our customer, which generally occurs upon shipment or delivery to a customer based on terms of the sale. Revenue is measured by the transaction price, which is defined as the amount of consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing goods to customers. The transaction price is adjusted for estimates of known or expected variable consideration, which includes consumer incentives, trade promotions, and allowances, such as coupons, discounts, rebates, incentives, cooperative advertising, and other programs. Variable consideration related to these programs is recorded as a reduction to revenue based on amounts that we expect to pay. The Company’s contracts with customers typically require payment either in advance of the transfer of goods or services or within customary commercial timeframes following invoicing. As a result, the period between performance and payment is not significant, and the Company has concluded that its contracts do not contain a significant financing component.
The transaction price contains estimates of known or expected variable consideration, including whether the variable consideration is constrained. We base these estimates on current performance, historical utilization, and projected redemption rates of each program. We review and update these estimates regularly until the incentives or product returns are realized, and the impact of any adjustments are recognized in the period the adjustments are identified.
We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions used to recognize revenue. As noted above, estimates are made based on historical experience and other factors. Typically, programs that are offered have a short duration and, historically, the difference between actual experience compared to estimated redemption and performance has not been significant to the quarterly or annual consolidated financial statements. However, if the level of redemption rates or performance were to vary significantly from estimates, we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. We have not made any material changes in the accounting methodology used to recognize revenue during the past three fiscal years.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets and definite life intangible assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Examples include a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which we use the asset, a change in its physical condition, or an unexpected change in financial performance. When evaluating long-lived assets and definite life intangible assets for impairment, we compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated undiscounted future cash flows. An impairment is indicated if the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset. For assets held for sale, we compare the carrying value of the disposal group to fair value. The impairment is the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the asset.
Stock Incentive Plan
Compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions is measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The fair value of the compensation is estimated utilizing well-established valuation methods, including Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo, and is calculated and recognized over the employees’ service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded-vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. While there is inherent uncertainty in the estimated fair value of the awards, management believes that the expectations and assumptions are reasonable.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See “Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements” in Note 1 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K for additional information.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (PCAOB #185)
48
Consolidated Balance Sheets
51
Consolidated Statements of Operations
52
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
53
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
54
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
55
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Laird Superfood, Inc (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Baker Tilly US, LLP
Portland, Oregon
February 26, 2025
We served as the Company’s auditor between 2018 and 2025.
LAIRD SUPERFOOD, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of
December 31, 2025
December 31, 2024
Assets
Current assets
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Accounts receivable, net
Inventory
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Total current assets
Property and equipment, net
Intangible assets, net
Related party license agreements
Right-of-use assets
Total assets
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses
Related party liabilities
Lease liabilities, current portion
Total current liabilities
Lease liabilities
Total liabilities
Stockholders’ equity
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024; 11,071,096 and 10,694,765 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2025, respectively; and 10,668,705 and 10,292,374 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2024, respectively.
Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated deficit
Total stockholders’ equity
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended
December 31,
Salaries, wages, and benefits
Other general and administrative
Total general and administrative expenses
Marketing and advertising
Selling
Related party marketing agreements
Total sales and marketing expenses
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding used in computing net loss per share of common stock, basic and diluted
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stockholders’ Equity
Shares
Amount
Additional Paid-in Capital
Accumulated Deficit
Total
Balances, January 1, 2024
Stock-based compensation
Common stock issuances, net of taxes
Common stock issuance costs
Stock options exercised
Balances, December 31, 2024
Balances, December 31, 2025
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Cash flows from operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Provision for inventory obsolescence
Impairment of long-lived intangible assets
Other operating activities, net
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
Operating lease liability
Net cash from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment
Net cash from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Stock option exercises
Net cash from financing activities
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of period
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest
Cash paid for income taxes
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash financing activities
Prepaid expenses paid for with a short-term financing arrangement included in accrued expenses
Deferred common stock issuance costs included in accrued expenses
Taxes withheld to cover net issuances of incentive stock awards included in accrued expenses
LAIRD SUPERFOOD, INC
1.
Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Financial Statement Preparation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements (the “balance sheet(s),” “statement(s) of operations,” “statement(s) of stockholders’ equity,” and “statement(s) of cash flows,” collectively, the “financial statements”) include the accounts of Laird Superfood, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiary, Picky Bars, LLC, (collectively, the “Company,” or “Laird Superfood”). The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Operating results include the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Nature of Operations
Laird Superfood creates clean, functional foods, many of which incorporate adaptogens which may be beneficial in reducing stress, improving energy levels, enhancing mental performance, mood regulation, and immune system support. Our primary products include (i) coffee creamers, (ii) coffee, tea, and hot chocolate products, (iii) hydration and beverage enhancing products, and (iv) snacks and other food items. The Company was founded in 2015.
The Company currently operates in one reportable segment. See Note 15 for additional information regarding this single segment.
Principles of Consolidation
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in our accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses during the reporting period. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Although management believes their estimates and assumptions are reasonable when made, they are based upon information available at the time they are made. Management evaluates the estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and, if necessary, makes adjustments. Due to the risks and uncertainties involved in the Company’s business and evolving market conditions and given the subjective element of the estimates and assumptions made, actual results may differ from estimated results. The most significant estimates and judgments include those related to allowances for credit losses and returns, inventory obsolescence, goodwill, intangible assets, valuation allowance for deferred taxes, variable consideration in contracts with customers, and fair value of stock-based compensation.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash are highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased. For the purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company includes cash on hand, cash in clearing accounts, cash on deposit with financial institutions, investments with an original maturity of three months or less, and restricted cash in determining the total balance.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist principally of trade receivables, which are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of allowances for credit losses. Trade receivables do not bear interest. Receivables are considered past due or delinquent according to contract terms. Management monitors outstanding balances and writes off accounts receivable as they are determined uncollectible. The Company provides for estimated losses on accounts receivable based on a forward-looking expected loss approach based on historical experience, current economic conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. These estimated allowances for credit losses consist of reserves for non-payment as well as outstanding balances on our factoring agreement.
The following table summarizes the components of estimated allowances for credit losses:
Allowance for bad debts
Factoring payable (receivable)
Total allowances for credit losses
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value and approximate costs determined on the first-in first-out basis and consists primarily of raw materials, packaging, and finished goods, which include co-packing fees, indirect labor and allocable overhead. All of the Company's inventory is produced by third-party co-manufacturers.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses are recognized as an asset upon payment, prior to the realizability of the service or receipt of goods. They are subsequently amortized either on a straight-line basis according to contractual terms, when services or arrangements are rendered, or when goods are received. Deposits are recognized when paid and are relieved either upon refund or upon determining that the deposit will not be refunded. Other current assets are recognized when estimable and realizable.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are valued at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs that do not extend the useful life or increase the value of the assets are charged to expense in the period incurred. Additions and betterments are capitalized. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives for depreciation purposes for furniture and equipment range from 2 to 5 years. The useful life for leasehold improvements is the lesser of the lease term or the useful life. Construction in progress is not depreciated until such a time that the assets are completed and placed into service.
Leases
In accordance with ASC 842, Leases (“ASC 842”), the Company accounts for a contract as a lease when it has the right to control the asset for a period of time while obtaining substantially all of the asset’s economic benefits. We categorize leases at their inception as either operating, finance, or short-term leases and determine if an arrangement contains an embedded lease. For arrangements that meet the definition of a lease, the Company determines the initial classification and measurement of its right-of-use asset and lease liability at the lease commencement date and, thereafter, if modified. The lease term includes any renewal options that the Company is reasonably assured to exercise. Lease agreements effective during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 cover, or covered, office space, and vehicles. All of our long-term leases are operating leases. Operating leases are included in right-of-use assets, current lease liabilities, and long-term lease liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
In addition to rent, the leases may require the Company to pay additional costs, such as utilities, maintenance, and other operating costs, which are generally referred to as non-lease components. The Company has elected to not separate lease and non-lease components. Only the fixed costs for lease components and their associated non-lease components are accounted for as a single lease component and recognized as part of a right-of-use asset and liability. Lease-related liabilities are recognized at the present value of the remaining contractual fixed lease payments, discounted using our incremental borrowing rate. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, while variable lease payments are expensed as incurred.
Leased assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease right-of-use assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. We use a secured incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate for the present value of lease payments when the rate implicit in the contract is not readily determinable. For operating leases with variable payments dependent upon an index or rate, we apply the active index or rate as of the lease commencement date. Variable lease payments not based on an index or rate are not included in the operating lease liability as they cannot be reasonably estimated and are recognized in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred. Leases that have a term of twelve months or less upon commencement date are considered short-term in nature. Accordingly, short-term leases are not included on the consolidated balance sheets and are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term, which commences on the date we have the right to control the property.
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the five-step model as prescribed by ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”) in which the Company evaluates the transfer of promised goods or services and recognizes revenue when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for the arrangements that the Company determines are within the scope of ASC 606, the Company performs the following five steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. See Note 14 for additional information regarding revenue recognition. The Company has elected, as a practical expedient, to account for the shipping and handling as fulfillment costs, rather than as a separate performance obligation. The Company estimates the impact of certain common practices employed by us and other manufacturers of consumer products, such as scan-based trading, product rebate and other pricing allowances, product returns, trade promotions, sales broker commissions and slotting fees. Methodologies for determining these provisions are dependent on customer pricing and promotional practices. The Company records reductions to revenue and a refund liability for estimated product returns and pricing adjustments in the same period that the related revenue is recorded. These estimates will be based on industry-based historical data, historical sales returns, if any, analysis of credit memo data, and other factors known at the time.
Cost of goods sold includes the cost of products purchased, packaging, co-packers’ tolling fees, inbound and outbound freight costs, indirect labor, third party labor to store and ship our products, and overhead costs incurred in the storage and distribution of products sold in the period.
Shipping and Handling
Costs of shipping and handling related to sales revenue are included in cost of goods sold. Shipping and handling costs totaled $5,341,523 and $5,189,469 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Income generated from shipping costs billed through to customers was included in Sales, net in the consolidated statements of operations. Shipping income totaled $489,352 and $506,732 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Research and Product Development
Amounts spent on research and development activities are expensed as incurred and are included in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations. Research and product development expenses were $329,814 and $114,144 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Marketing and advertising costs are expensed when incurred.
Income taxes provide for the tax effects of transactions reported in the consolidated financial statements and consist of income taxes currently due and deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company may also be subject to interest and penalties from taxing authorities on underpayment of income taxes. In such an event, interest and penalties are included in income tax expense. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial statement and income tax purposes. The differences relate primarily to depreciable and amortizable assets (use of different depreciation and amortization methods and lives for financial statement and income tax purposes), stock-based compensation, operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities, and net operating losses. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled.
The compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions is recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The cost is measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Compensation cost for all employee stock awards is calculated and recognized over the employees’ service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded-vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Compensation cost for all consultant stock awards is calculated and recognized over the consultant’s service period based on the grant date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Upon exercise of stock option awards or vesting of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and market-based stock units (“MSUs”), recipients are issued shares of common stock. Upon the grant date restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), recipients are issued restricted shares of common stock, for which the restriction is lifted upon vesting of the award. Pre-vesting forfeitures result in the reversal of all compensation cost as of the date of termination; post-vesting cancellation does not.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock that were outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is similarly determined, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if all dilutive potential common stock and preferred stock had been issued and are calculated under the treasury stock method. Due to the Company’s net loss, all stock options, unvested restricted stock, and convertible preferred stock are anti-dilutive and excluded.
Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets
Indefinite lived intangible assets are valued at cost. The Company assesses qualitative factors each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances exist that indicate that the fair values of the indefinite lived intangible assets are less than the carrying amounts. Upon considering these factors, the Company determines whether or not it is more likely than not that the fair values of the assets are less than the carrying amounts. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, impairment would be recognized.
Definite Lived Intangible Assets, net
Definite lived intangible assets are valued at cost, net of accumulated amortization. Amortization is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives for amortization purposes range between 3 and 10 years. Amortization expense is allocated to general and administrative expense. The Company assesses qualitative factors each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances exist that indicate that the fair values of the definite lived intangible assets were less than the carrying amounts.
Employee Benefit Plan
The Company sponsors a defined contribution 401(k) plan (the “401(k) plan”) for all employees 18 years of age or older. Employee contributions may be made on a before-tax basis, limited by Internal Revenue Service regulations. Contributions of $124,369 and $136,074 were remitted during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, there were $190,949 and $129,301 of employer 401(k) contribution liabilities, respectively, included in accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.
Commitments and Contingencies
We may be subject to contingencies arising in the ordinary course of business, such as product liability and other product-related litigation, commercial litigation, environmental claims and proceedings, government investigations and guarantees and indemnifications. In assessing contingencies related to legal and environmental proceedings that are pending against the Company, or unasserted claims that are probable of being asserted, we record accruals for these contingencies to the extent that we conclude that a loss is both probable and reasonably estimable. If some amount within a range of loss appears to be a better estimate than any other amount within the range, we accrue that amount. Alternatively, when no amount within a range of loss appears to be a better estimate than any other amount, we accrue the lowest amount in the range. We record anticipated recoveries under existing insurance contracts when recovery is assured. Any legal fees incurred in connection with the resolution of a contingency are expensed as incurred.
In connection with the Navitas Acquisition, the Company has accrued $0.7 million as of December 31, 2025 for professional fees incurred through year-end. The engagement is ongoing and is expected to conclude in March 2026. The Company expects to recognize approximately $0.3 million of additional fees in Q1 2026, representing the remainder of its maximum accepted obligation of $1.0 million for services performed in Q1 2026. In March 2026, the third-party service provider submitted invoices totaling approximately $1.8 million for services rendered from November 2025 through February 2026; additional fees for March 2026 services have not yet been invoiced. The Company has communicated that it will not pay more than $1.0 million in total for this engagement and is disputing all amounts in excess of that threshold, with negotiations ongoing. The Company does not believe payment in excess of $1.0 million is probable and believes that the accrual at December 31, 2025 is appropriate; however, the ultimate resolution is uncertain. Based on invoices received to date, the reasonably possible additional loss above the Company's maximum accepted obligation is at least $0.8 million; this amount is expected to increase upon receipt of the March 2026 invoice.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts presented in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income, total assets, total liabilities, or shareholders’ equity.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”), which requires, among other things, additional disclosures primarily related to the income tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. The expanded annual disclosures are effective for our year ending December 31, 2025, and were applied prospectively. See Note 9 for further information on our income taxes.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement -Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses ("ASU 2024-03"). ASU 2024-03 requires additional disclosures about the nature of expenses included in the income statement, such as purchases of inventory, employee compensation, and depreciation. ASU 2024-03 is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of ASU 2024-03 on its financial statements and related disclosures.
2.
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the consolidated balance sheets that sum to the total of the same such amounts shown in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Amounts in restricted cash represent those that are required to be set aside by contractual agreements which either require the Company to utilize the funds only for specific, contractually identified purposes, or are restricted to collateralize borrowings against company credit cards.
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash balances that exceeded the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and Securities Investor Protection Corporation (“SIPC”) insurable limits as of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 totaled $4,488,163 and $7,621,392, respectively. The Company has never experienced any losses related to these balances. The Company’s cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash are with what the Company believes to be high-quality financial institutions and considers the risks associated with these funds in excess of FDIC and SIPC insurable limits to be low.
3.
The following table presents the components of inventory, net of reserves:
Raw materials and packaging
Finished goods
Total Inventory
The Company periodically reviews the value of items in inventory and provides write-offs of inventory based on current market assessment, which are charged to cost of goods sold. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company recorded $699,403 and $599,902, respectively, of costs related to the disposal of and reserve for excess, obsolete, and discontinued inventories included in costs of goods sold.
4.
The following table presents the components of prepaid expenses and other current assets:
Prepaid expenses
Prepaid inventory
Deposits
Other current assets
5.
Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment, net was comprised of the following:
Gross Carrying Amount
Accumulated Depreciation
Net Carrying Amount
Furniture and office equipment
Leasehold improvements
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, depreciation expense was $93,699 and $81,163, respectively.
6.
Intangible Assets
Intangible Assets, net is composed of the following:
Accumulated Amortization
Trade names (10 years)
Recipes (10 years)
Other intangible assets (3 years)
Definite-lived intangible assets
Licensing agreements (indefinite)
Total intangible assets
The weighted-average remaining useful life of all the Company’s intangible assets is 0.4 years.
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, amortization expense was $160,020 and $189,108, respectively.
Definite Lived Intangible Assets
Definite life intangible assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Examples include a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which we use the asset, or an unexpected change in financial performance. When evaluating definite life intangible assets for impairment, we compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated undiscounted future cash flows. An impairment is indicated if the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset. The Company considered the above factors when assessing whether the Company’s long-lived assets will be recoverable.
During the third quarter of 2025, the Company identified a triggering event related to the Picky Bars long-lived asset group (‘‘the asset group’’) related to a decision to discontinue the Picky Bars brand in the second quarter of 2026, in order to re-direct the Company’s investment into the Laird Superfood brand. As a result, the Company evaluated the recoverability of the asset group as of September 30, 2025. The estimated undiscounted future cash flows generated by the asset group were less than the carrying amount, indicating that the asset group was not recoverable. The Company performed a quantitative analysis on the Company’s estimates of the fair values of the asset group which exceeded their carrying values, indicating that the asset group was impaired. In the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recorded impairment charges of $661,103, net of accumulated amortization, in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of operations, which was allocated to acquired trade names and recipes. The amortization on the impaired fair value was accelerated for the expected life of the assets, ending in the second quarter of 2026. There were no impairment charges in the year ended December 31, 2024.
Intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from three to ten years. The estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
2026
On August 3, 2015, the Company entered into a license agreement with the Company’s co-founder Laird Hamilton (the “LH License”). The LH License stated Laird Hamilton’s contribution to the Company was in the form of intellectual property, granting the Company the right to use Laird Hamilton’s name and likeness. This contribution, which was reported on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, was valued at $132,000 and satisfied with the issuance of 660,000 shares of common stock. The Company has determined that the intangible asset associated with the LH License has an indefinite life, as there is no foreseeable limit on the period of time over which it is expected to contribute to the cash flows of the Company.
On May 2, 2018, the Company entered into a license agreement with Gabrielle Reece, who is married to Mr. Hamilton (the “GR License”). Pursuant to the GR License, Ms. Reece granted the Company rights to her name, signature, voice, picture, image, likeness, and biographical information commencing on July 1, 2015. This contribution, which is reported on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, was valued at $100 based on the consideration exchanged. The Company has determined that the intangible asset associated with the GR License has an indefinite life, as there is no foreseeable limit on the period of time over which it is expected to contribute to the cash flows of the Company.
On November 19, 2018, the Company executed a License and Preservation Agreement with Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece which superseded the predecessor license agreements with both individuals. The agreement added specific terms related to non-competition and allowable usage of the property under the license. No additional consideration was exchanged in connection with the agreement and the life of the agreement was set at 100 years.
On May 26, 2020, the Company executed a License and Preservation Agreement with Mr. Hamilton, and Ms. Reece (the “2020 License”), which superseded the predecessor license and preservation agreement with both individuals. Among other modifications, the agreement (i) modified certain approval rights of Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece for use of their respective images, signatures, voices, and names (other than those owned by the Company), rights of publicity and common law and statutory rights to the foregoing in the Company’s products, (ii) modified certain assignment, change of control and indemnification provisions, and (iii) granted the Company the right to extend the term of the agreement for additional ten-year terms upon the expiration of the initial one-hundred year term. No additional consideration was exchanged in connection with the agreement.
7.
Accrued Expenses
The following table presents the components of accrued expenses:
Accrued compensation and benefits
Accrued accounts payable
Other accrued expenses
8.
Lessee
The Company assumed an operating lease in the acquisition of Picky Bars, LLC on May 3, 2021. The initial lease term was 62 months. The lease was terminated, without penalty, effective October 31, 2024.
The Company entered into a sublease agreement with Somatic Experiencing Trauma Institute with a commencement date of January 1, 2023, for a 5,257 square foot office space in Boulder, Colorado which serves as the Company’s new headquarters. This lease will expire on July 1, 2027.
The components of lease expense were as follows:
Operating leases
Operating lease cost
Variable lease cost
Operating lease expense
Short-term lease rent expense
Total rent expense
Weighted-average remaining lease term – operating leases (in years)
Weighted-average discount rate – operating leases
As of December 31, 2025, future minimum payments during the next two years are as follows:
2027
Less imputed interest
Operating lease liabilities
Lessor
The Company executed a sublease agreement of the Picky Bars, LLC operating lease on March 1, 2022. The lease commenced on April 1, 2022. The initial lease term expired on April 30, 2025. The sublease was terminated, without penalty, effective October 31, 2024. The lease met all of the criteria of an operating lease and was accordingly recognized straight line over the lease term with a related sublease rental asset accounting for abatements and initial direct costs.
The components of rental income were as follows:
Operating lease income
Variable lease income
Total rental income
9.
The Company had a tax net loss for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 and therefore has recorded no assessment of current federal income taxes. The Company is subject to minimum state taxes for various jurisdictions as well as subject to franchise taxes considered income taxes under ASC 740, Income Taxes. A reconciliation of income tax expense at the federal statutory rate to the income tax provision at the Company’s effective rate is as follows:
Effective Tax Rate
The following table disaggregates the Company’s effective tax rate, on a prospective basis, for the year ended December 31, 2025:
U.S. federal statutory tax rate
State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax effect (1)
Foreign tax effects
Effects of changes in tax laws or rates enacted in the current period
Effect of cross-border tax laws
Tax credits
Changes in valuation allowances - federal
Nontaxable or nondeductible items
Stock compensation: RSU windfall
Stock compensation: PSU windfall
Capitalized stock acquisition costs
Changes in unrecognized tax benefits
Other adjustments
Effective tax rate
(1) State taxes in Texas and Oregon made up the majority (greater than 50 percent) of the tax effect in this category.
The following table disaggregates the Company’s effective tax rate by municipality, on a prospective basis, for the year ended December 31, 2025:
U.S. Federal Income tax statutory rate
State and local income and franchise taxes
Foreign income tax statutory rate
The following table presents the Company’s effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2024:
Income tax benefit at statutory rates
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
Fixed assets
Reported income tax expense
Effective tax rate:
Income Taxes Paid
The following table presents cash paid for income taxes disaggregated by foreign, domestic, and state taxes, on a prospective basis, for the year ended December 31, 2025:
Federal
State
Foreign
Total income taxes paid (net of refunds received)
The following table presents cash paid for income taxes in the following jurisdictions that exceeded 5 percent of total income taxes paid (net of refunds), on a prospective basis, for the year ended December 31, 2025:
Texas
Oregon
As of December 31, 2025, the Company did not provide a current or deferred U.S. federal income tax provision or benefit for any of the periods presented because the Company has reported cumulative losses since inception. The Company has recorded a provision for state income taxes and a corresponding current state income tax payable of approximately $3,028 and $9,306 as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Deferred Taxes
The Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following:
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards
Intangible assets
Property and equipment
Unexercised options
Total deferred tax assets
Valuation allowance
Total net deferred tax assets
The Company assesses its deferred tax assets and liabilities to determine if it is more likely than not, they will be realized; if not, a valuation allowance is required to be recorded. Management has determined it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets would be realized, thus a full valuation allowance was recorded against the deferred tax assets. The Company may reduce the valuation allowance against definite-lived deferred tax assets at such a time when it becomes more likely than not that the definite-lived deferred tax assets will be realized. The change in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were net increases of $0.4 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
Net Operating Losses
The following table presents net operating losses (“NOLs”) and other income tax carryforwards for the following periods:
NOLs and other income tax carryforwards
Federal NOLs pre-2017 (1)
Federal NOLs post-2018 (2)
State NOLs (3)
Total NOLs
Credits (4)
Other carryforwards (4)
Total NOLs and other income tax carryforwards
(1) Can be carried forward for 20 years and which begin to expire in 2036.
(2) Can be carried forward indefinitely.
(3) Can be carried forward for between 15 and 20 years and which begin to expire in 2031.
(4) Can be carried forward for between one and five years and begin to expire in 2026.
The use of NOLs may be subject to certain limitations, such as those triggered by ownership changes under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Because these provisions, the use of a portion of our NOLs and tax credit carryforwards may be limited in future periods. Further, a portion of the carryforwards may expire before being applied to reduce future income tax liabilities.
GAAP requires management to evaluate and report information regarding its exposure to various tax positions taken by the Company. The Company has determined whether there are any tax positions that have met the recognition threshold and has measured the Company’s exposure to those tax positions. Management believes that the Company has adequately addressed all relevant tax positions and that there are no unrecorded tax liabilities.
Open Tax Years
As of December 31, 2025, the Company is subject to examination by U.S. federal and state taxing authorities for years that remain open under the applicable statutes of limitations.
Under the Internal Revenue Code, the Internal Revenue Service generally has three years from the later of the return’s original due date or the date the return is filed to assess additional federal income taxes. Based on this period, the Company’s U.S. federal corporate income tax returns for tax years 2022 through 2025 remain open to examination as of December 31, 2025.
The Oregon Department of Revenue applies a five‑year statute of limitations for issuing a notice of deficiency related to corporate excise and income taxes. Accordingly, the Company’s Oregon corporate income tax returns for tax years 2020 through 2025 remain open to examination.
For Texas franchise tax purposes, the Comptroller of Public Accounts generally has four years from the date a tax becomes due and payable to assess additional franchise tax. As a result, the Company’s Texas franchise tax filings for report years 2021 through 2025 remain open as of December 31, 2025,
Management believes that adequate provision has been made for any income tax uncertainties related to these open tax years. Adjustments, if any, resulting from examinations are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
10.
The Company adopted an incentive plan (the “2020 Plan”) on September 22, 2020, to provide for the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, unrestricted stock, dividend equivalent rights, performance shares and other performance-based awards, other equity-based awards and cash bonus awards to Company employees, employees of the Company’s affiliates, non-employee directors and certain consultants and advisors. In May 2024, the Company’s shareholders approved an amendment to the 2020 Plan to reserve an additional 1,536,742 shares for issuance. As of December 31, 2025, the Company was authorized to award 1,202,649 shares in future issuances under the 2020 Plan and 2,114,117 shares are outstanding and issuable upon vesting and exercise of outstanding options and rights. Previously, the Company had adopted its 2018 Equity Incentive Plan and 2016 Stock Incentive Plan (together with the 2020 Plan, the “Stock Incentive Plans”), under which the Company had issued stock options and RSUs. Following the effective date of the 2020 Plan, no additional awards may be made under the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan or 2016 Stock Incentive Plan. The Stock Incentive Plans were established to provide eligible individuals with an incentive to contribute to the Company’s success and to operate and manage the Company’s business in a manner that will provide for its long-term growth and profitability and that will benefit the Company’s shareholders and other stakeholders, including employees and customers. The Stock Incentive Plans are also intended to provide a means of recruiting, rewarding, and retaining key personnel.
Stock Options
The Stock Incentive Plans prescribe various terms and conditions for the award of options and the total number of shares authorized for this purpose. For options, the strike price is equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock price at the date of grant. Generally, options become exercisable based on years of service and vesting schedules, and expire after (i) a period of ten years from the date of grant, (ii) three months following the date of termination of employment from the Company, (iii) one year following the date of termination from the Company by reason of death or disability, (iv) the date of termination of employment for cause, or (v) the fifth anniversary of the date of the grant if it is held by a 10 percent or greater stockholder.
The following tables summarize the Company’s stock option activity:
Weighted
Average
Options
Exercise Price
Contractual
Aggregate
Activity
(per share)
Term (years)
Intrinsic Value
Balance at January 1, 2025
Granted
Exercised/released (1)
Cancelled/forfeited
Balance at December 31, 2025
Exercisable at December 31, 2025
(1) Includes 15,007 shares of common stock which were used to cover the strike price in cashless net share settlements.
Balance at January 1, 2024
Balance at December 31, 2024
Exercisable at December 31, 2024
(1) Includes 86,643 shares of common stock which were used to cover the strike price in cashless net share settlements.
The aggregate intrinsic value in the tables above, which is the amount by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price of outstanding options, is before applicable income taxes and represents the amount optionees would have realized if all in-the-money options had been exercised on the last business day of the period indicated.
The total intrinsic value of options vested was $394,452 and $682,988 in the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised was $450,713 and $596,943 the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option award on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), requires the use of the fair-value-based method for measuring the value of stock-based compensation. The estimated fair value of each grant of stock options awarded during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 was determined using the following assumptions:
Expected Volatility. The expected volatility is based on the volatility of the historical stock prices of identified peer companies.
Expected Term. Due to the lack of a public market for the trading of shares of the Company’s common stock prior to the Company’s initial public offering that closed on September 25, 2020, and the lack of sufficient Company-specific historical data, the expected term of employee stock options is determined using the “simplified” method, as prescribed in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, Share Based Payments, whereby the expected life equals the arithmetic average of the vesting term and the original contractual term of the option.
Risk-free Interest Rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the interest rate payable on United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for a period that is commensurate with the assumed expected term.
Dividend Yield. The dividend yield is 0% because the Company has never paid, and for the foreseeable future does not expect to pay, dividend on its shares of common stock.
The inputs and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates and involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if factors change and management uses different inputs and assumptions, the Company’s share-based compensation expense could be materially different for future awards. The grant-date fair value of stock options was estimated at the time of grant using the following weighted-average inputs and assumptions in the Black-Scholes option pricing model:
Weighted-average expected volatility
Weighted-average expected term (years)
Weighted-average expected risk-free interest rate
Dividend yield
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
There were no stock options granted in the year ended December 31, 2025.
Restricted Stock Units
The following tables summarize the Company’s RSU activity:
Weighted Average
RSU
Grant Date Fair
Remaining Vesting
(1) Includes 59,685 shares of common stock which were withheld to cover payroll taxes.
(1) Includes 16,699 shares of common stock which were withheld to cover payroll taxes.
The Company estimates the fair value of each RSU using the fair value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant for the purposes of calculating compensation costs. The total vest date fair value of RSUs vested was $2,401,417 and $1,135,692 in the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Restricted Stock
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company issued 7,717 shares of restricted stock to a contractor for services rendered, at a fair value of $7.40 per share, with a remaining vesting term of 0.57 years. The Company estimates the fair value of each share of restricted stock using the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant for the purposes of calculating compensation costs. The fair value of shares of restricted stock that were granted during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $57,106 and $0, respectively.
Market-Based Stock Units
The following tables summarize the Company’s market-based stock unit (“MSU”) activity:
MSU
Exercised/released
These MSUs vested upon the 30-day weighted average stock price reaching or exceeding established targets, after reaching certain time targets. We estimated the grant-date fair value of the MSUs using a Monte Carlo simulation which required assumptions for expected volatility, risk-free rate of return and dividend yield. Expected volatility within the index were derived using historical volatility of a selected peer group over a period equal to the length of the performance period. We based the risk-free rate of return on the yield of a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury bond with a maturity equal to the performance period and assumed a 0% dividend rate. Compensation expense for these MSUs was recognized over the requisite service period regardless of whether the market conditions are satisfied.
The total vest date fair value of MSUs vested was $1,276,000 in the year ended December 31, 2024. No MSUs were granted in the year ended December 31, 2024. There were no outstanding MSUs as of December 31, 2024.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense is recognized ratably over the requisite service period for all awards. The following tables summarize the Company’s stock-based compensation recorded as a result of applying the provisions of ASC 718 to equity awards:
Unrecognized Compensation Cost Related to Non-Vested Awards as of
Weighted-Average Remaining Vesting Period as of
December 31, 2025 (years)
Stock options
RSUs
Total stock-based compensation
December 31, 2024 (years)
11.
Basic loss per share is determined by dividing net loss attributable to Laird Superfood, Inc. common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is similarly determined, except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common and preferred shares that would have been outstanding if all dilutive potential common shares had been issued. Dilutive potential common shares consist of employee stock options, RSUs, and MSUs, the dilutive effect of which the Company calculated using the treasury stock method. Basic loss per share is reconciled to diluted earnings per share in the following table:
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted
Basic and diluted:
Net loss per share, basic and diluted
Common stock options, restricted stock awards, and market-based stock awards excluded due to anti-dilutive effect
12.
Concentrations
Vendor A
Vendor B
Vendor C
Vendor D
*The vendor accounts payable balance is below 10% of total accounts payable.
The following table details the concentration of customer accounts receivable balances in excess of 10% of total gross accounts receivable at each period:
Customer A
Customer B
Customer C
The following table details the concentration of sales to specific customers in excess of 10% of total net sales for each period:
During 2025 and 2024, the Company purchased a substantial portion of raw materials and packaging from certain suppliers. The following table details the concentration of purchases from specific suppliers in excess of 10% of total purchases for each period:
Supplier A
Supplier B
Supplier C
*Purchases from the supplier amounted to less than 10% of total purchases.
During 2025 and 2024, the Company purchased a substantial portion of raw materials and packaging from certain geographical regions. The following table details the concentration of purchases from specific foreign countries in excess of 10% of total purchases for each period:
Country A
Country B
Country C
Country D
*Purchases from suppliers in the region amounted to less than 10% of total purchases.
13.
Related Party
FASB ASC Topic 850, Related Party Disclosures, requires that information about transactions with related parties that would make a difference in decision making shall be disclosed so that users of the consolidated financial statements can evaluate their significance. The Company conducts business with suppliers and service providers who are also shareholders of the Company. From time to time, service providers are offered shares of common stock as compensation for their services. Shares provided as compensation are calculated based on the fair value of the service provided and the most recent equity offering price (or market price post-IPO) per share. Additional related party transactions are noted below.
License Agreements
On May 26, 2020, the Company executed a License and Preservation Agreement which superseded the predecessor license and preservation agreement with both Mr. Hamilton and Ms. Reece. Among other modifications, the agreement (i) modified certain approval rights, (ii) modified certain assignment, change of control and indemnification provisions, and (iii) granted the Company the right to extend the term of the agreement for additional ten-year terms upon the expiration of the initial one-hundred-year term. No additional consideration was exchanged in connection with the agreement. See additional discussion related to the 2020 License in Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements.
Marketing Agreements
The Company has an influencer agreement with Gabrielle Reece to provide certain marketing services. In connection with these services, in the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, advertising expenses totaling $309,805 and $251,061 were included in sales and marketing expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, amounts payable to Gabrielle Reece of $46,500 and $34,947, respectively, are included in related party liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
14.
The Company’s primary source of revenue is sales of (i) coffee creamers, (ii) coffee, tea, and hot chocolate products, (iii) hydration and beverage enhancing products, and (iv) snacks and other food items.
In accordance with ASC Topic 606, the Company disaggregates net sales from contracts with customers based on the characteristics of the products sold:
The Company generates revenue through two channels: e-commerce and wholesale:
The Company generated revenue two distinct brands. Laird Superfood and Picky Bars, during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. Net sales for these brands are summarized below:
Laird Superfood
Picky Bars
Receivables from contracts with customers are included in accounts receivable. Contract assets include deferred cost of goods sold associated with deferred revenue and are included in finished goods inventories. Contract liabilities include deferred revenue, customer deposits, rewards programs, and refund liabilities, and are included in accrued expenses. Contract liabilities outstanding at the beginning of the year were realized during the year end December 31, 2025. The balances of receivables from contracts with customers, contract assets, and contract liabilities were as follows:
January 1,
Contract liabilities
15.
Reportable Segments
In accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”), the Company considers operating segment(s) to be components of the Company’s business for which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
The Company manages their business through one operating and reportable segment: superfood. The superfood segment provides customers with clean, functional, and sustainability-conscious alternatives in an industry rife with ultra-processed ingredients and laden with artificial sweeteners. This segment includes the sales of (i) coffee creamers, (ii) coffee, tea, and hot chocolate products, (iii) hydration and beverage enhancing products, and (iv) snacks and other food items. Substantially all revenue is derived from domestic product sales. See Note 14 for presentation of revenue disaggregated by product groups and by sales channels. The accounting policies of the superfood segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. The Company does not have intra-entity sales or transfers.
The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) is the Chief Executive Officer.
The CODM assesses segment performance and allocates resources based on consolidated net income (loss). Significant segment expenses that would require disclosure are costs of goods sold, general and administrative, marketing and advertising, and selling. Other segment information includes other income, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, income tax expense, and other extraordinary or unusual items which are utilized to reconcile net income (loss) to adjusted EBITDA. The CODM uses consolidated net income to assess operating performance as compared to prior results, annual operating plans, iterative periodic forecasts, and our competitors. The CODM uses this information to allocate future operating and capital expenditures. The measure of segment assets is reported on the consolidated balance sheets as total assets.
The following table reconciles consolidated net loss to consolidated adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented:
Years Ended December 31,
Adjusted for:
Other Income
Product quality issue (a)
Acquisition costs (b)
Adjusted EBITDA
(a) In January 2023, the Company identified a product quality issue with raw material from one vendor and we voluntarily withdrew any affected finished goods. The Company previously incurred costs associated with product testing, discounts for replacement orders, and inventory obsolescence costs. The Company reached settlement with a supplier in the third quarter of 2023 and recorded recoveries in 2024.
(b) On December 21, 2025, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire Navitas Organics and Global Superfood Company. The Company incurred professional fees related to this business combination in the year ended December 31, 2025. See Note 16 for more information on the Navitas Acquisition.
16.
Subsequent Events
Subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the consolidated financial statements are available to be issued. The Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to December 31, 2025 for potential recognition of disclosure in the financial consolidated statements.
On the Closing Date and concurrently with the closing of the Navitas Acquisition, we completed the transactions contemplated by that certain investment agreement, dated December 21, 2025 (the “Investment Agreement”), entered into by and among the Company, Gateway Superfood NSSIII Investment, LLC (“Gateway III”), and Gateway Superfood NSSIV Investment, LLC (“Gateway IV” and together with Gateway III, the “Investor”), with the Investor being an affiliate of Nexus Capital Management LP (“Nexus”), pursuant to which the Investor purchased an aggregate of 50,000 initial shares (the “Initial Shares”) of Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred Stock”) at a purchase price of $1,000 per share for gross proceeds of $50.0 million at closing (the “Nexus Investment”). The net proceeds from the Nexus Investment were subsequently used to complete the transactions contemplated by the Acquisition Agreement (the Nexus Investment together with the Navitas Acquisition, the “Transactions”).
Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, the Company has the option, following the Closing Date until 270 days following the Closing Date (or, if on such 270th day the Company is engaged in discussions with one or more counterparties regarding a potential acquisition or other strategic transaction, 360 days), to require the Investor to purchase the Additional Shares at $1,000 per share, provided that any funding of Additional Shares must be for a minimum of $25.0 million and be used to fund substantially concurrent strategic transactions approved by a majority of the disinterested directors of the Board.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2025, due to a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting described below. However, our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, has concluded that, notwithstanding the identified material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting, the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and includes those policies and procedures that:
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
provide reasonable assurances regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Our management, under the oversight of the Board of Directors, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, utilizing the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 framework). Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2025, due to the material weakness described below.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Financial System Design. We identified a deficiency in the design of our internal controls related to the preparation and approval of journal entries within our financial systems relevant to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. The configuration of the journal entry approval workflows in our financial accounting system was not designed to adequately enforce segregation of duties, whereby certain personnel had the ability to create, post, and edit journal entries that are not identified to be reviewed by separate individuals. This design deficiency constitutes a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. The material weakness could result in misstatements of the consolidated financial statements or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected. Management conducted a comprehensive review of journal entry activity for the affected population and found no evidence of resulting misstatements in the financial statements.
This Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm due to an exemption under Article 8 of Regulation S-X, as amended on June 28, 2018, for Smaller Reporting Companies with either (i) public float of less than $250 million, or (ii) public float of less than $700 million as long as annual revenues do not exceed $100 million.
Management's Remediation Plan
Subsequent to December 31, 2025, management implemented a system-level configuration change that enforces segregation of duties within the journal entry approval workflow in a manner designed to address the risk pathways identified. While management believes that the changes enacted will remediate the design deficiency, management will continue to test and monitor the impacts of the changes enacted to ensure that the design is operating effectively prior to concluding whether it has been fully remediated. Because this remediation was not completed prior to December 31, 2025, the material weakness had not been remediated as of the balance sheet date.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2025 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.
During the three months ended December 31, 2025, no director or officer of the Company adopted or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement, as each term is defined in Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
Directors of the Company
Our Board consists of nine directors and is not classified. The directors hold office from election until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are elected and qualified or until their death, resignation, or removal.
Biographical information for each director, including age, term of office, and business experience, including directorships with publicly traded companies during the past five years is listed below. In addition, for each person, we have included information regarding the business or other experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills that factored into the determination by the nominating and corporate governance committee and our Board that each such person should serve as a director.
Grant LaMontagne
Director, Chair
Director Since 2021
Age 69
Experience and Expertise
Mr. LaMontagne has served as a member of our Board since December 2021. Mr. LaMontagne has over 40 years of experience in the consumer-packaged goods (“CPG”) industry, leading large CPG customer organizations as SVP, Chief Customer Officer at Clorox Co. (NYSE: CLX) through 2013 and President, Consumer Sales/Customer Development, Kimberly-Clark North America through November 2017. He has a proven track record of building branded businesses and developing the people, capabilities and organizational structures necessary to achieve robust business results. Since January 2018, Mr. LaMontagne has served as a Senior Advisor for McKinsey & Company, focused specifically on creating single multifunctional strategic/demand plans driven by consumer segmentation, category growth ideas, and integrated commercial plans. He currently serves as the non-executive Board Chair for Acosta Sales & Marketing, one of the industry’s leading brand building agencies. Mr. LaMontagne holds a B.A. in Finance from the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Doug Behrens
Director
Director Since 2026
Age 57
Mr. Behrens has served as Chief Executive Officer of Catalina Snacks, Inc. since January 2024. Previously, Mr. Behrens served as President and Chief Customer Officer of Kind LLC from August 2019 to December 2023. Additionally, Mr. Behrens served as President of Amplify Snack Brands from May 2018 to August 2019. Mr. Behrens also held various leadership positions at WhiteWave Foods, including as President, Sales and Chief Customer Officer from December 2013 to May 2018 and as Senior Vice President and Chief Customer Officer from April 2010 to December 2013. Mr. Behrens received his B.S. from Christian Brothers University.
Age 49
Mr. Cohen co-founded Nexus in 2013 and is a Managing Partner of the firm. Mr. Cohen also currently serves on the boards of directors of Acosta, Dollar Shave Club, MAV Beauty, Sugarbear and TOMS Shoes. Mr. Cohen previously served on the boards of directors of General Nutrition Centers, Smart & Final and Sprouts Farmers Market. Prior to co-founding Nexus, Mr. Cohen spent 13 years at Apollo Global Management in its Private Equity Group. He began his career in the Mergers and Acquisitions Group of Salomon Smith Barney. Mr. Cohen received his B.B.A. from Emory University.
Greg Graves
Independent
Director Since 2018
Age 65
Other Public Boards:
● Axcelis Technologies
● SkyWater Technology
● Plug Power Inc. (through 2019)
Mr. Graves has served as a member of our Board since 2018. He has served as Chief Financial Officer of Entegris, Inc. since April 2007, and previously served as Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning & Business Development. Prior to joining Entegris in September 2002, Mr. Graves held positions in investment banking and corporate development, including at Piper Jaffray, RBC (Dain Rauscher) and The Pillsbury Company. From May 2017 to June 2019, Mr. Graves served as a director and Chairman of the audit committee of Plug Power Inc. (NASDAQ: PLUG), an energy solutions provider. Mr. Graves has served on the Board of Directors of the Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation since May 2016 and has been Chairman of the Audit and Finance Committee since April 2019. Since March 2022, Mr. Graves has served on the Board of Directors of SkyWater Technology (semiconductor specialty foundry) where he is a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Graves holds a B.A. and master’s degree in accounting and taxation from the University of Alabama and an M.B.A. from the University of Virginia.
Laird Hamilton
Co-Founder & Chief Innovator
Director Since 2015
Age 62
Mr. Hamilton co-founded Laird Superfood and has served as a member of our Board since its founding in 2015. Mr. Hamilton is an American athlete best known for his accomplishments in big wave surfing. Over the past 25 years, Mr. Hamilton has also been hailed as an innovator in several crossover board sports, including tow-in surfing, stand-up paddle boarding and hydrofoil boarding. For the past decade Mr. Hamilton has been focused on bringing his expertise and passion for fitness and nutrition to the masses. He has accomplished this by creating and co-founding several businesses focused on this mission. Most notably, in June 2015, Mr. Hamilton co-founded Laird Superfood, Inc. to focus on introducing his nutritional ideas to the broader public. Mr. Hamilton also co-created XPT Extreme Performance Training, a performance lifestyle brand, the following year to focus on his philosophies in exercise and lifestyle.
Maile Naylor
Director Since 2020
Age 52
● BJ’s Wholesale Club
● Leslie's Pool Supplies
Maile Naylor has served on our Board since our IPO in September 2020. Ms. Naylor has been a member of the Board of Directors of BJ’s Wholesale Club (NYSE: BJ) since 2019. Ms. Naylor spent twenty-five years working in the investment management industry analyzing and evaluating global consumer discretionary companies. She previously worked as an Investment Officer at MFS Investment Management, a global asset management company, from September 2005 until her retirement from the investment management industry in April 2018. Prior to that, Ms. Naylor also held positions at Scudder Kemper Investments and Wellington Management, each investment management firms. She holds a bachelor’s degree in finance from Boston University and is a CFA charter holder.
Kayla Dean Obia
Age 31
Mrs. Dean Obia, 31, joined Nexus in 2020 and serves as a Principal of the firm. She leads the firm’s investing efforts across the Beauty, Personal Care and Wellness sectors and currently serves on the boards of directors of MAV Beauty and TOMS Shoes. Prior to joining Nexus, Mrs. Dean Obia served as an investment professional at Abry Partners from 2018 to 2020, where she focused on investments across the firm’s private equity and senior equity funds. She began her career in the Financial Sponsors Group of Credit Suisse. Mrs. Dean Obia received her B.S. from the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley.
Age 55
● Super League Enterprises, Inc.
● Niagen Bioscience, Inc.
Ms. Patrick has served as President, CMO and Chief Digital Officer of LVMH, Marc Jacobs since May 2024. Ms. Patrick previously served as Executive Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer and Head of E-commerce of Claire’s from March 2021 to May 2024. Additionally, Ms. Patrick served as Global Chief Marketing Officer at PepsiCo, Inc. from June 2013 to January 2019. Prior to her time with PepsiCo, Inc., Ms. Patrick served as Chief Marketing Officer of Playboy Enterprises, Inc. and has also held various leadership positions with Walt Disney Company, Calvin Klein, Revlon, NBC Universal and Gap, Inc. Ms. Patrick also currently serves on the boards of directors of Super League Enterprises, Inc. (Nasdaq: SLE) and Niagen Bioscience, Inc. (Nasdaq: NAGE). Ms. Patrick is a Brandweek “Next Gen Marketer,” Reggie Award recipient, Forbes Top 50 Marketer and Adweek Marketing Vanguard. Ms. Patrick received her B.A. from Emerson College and her J.D. from Southwestern University.
Jason Vieth
President & Chief Executive Officer
Director Since 2022
Jason Vieth joined the Company as its President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director on January 31, 2022. Mr. Vieth’s extensive experience in the food and beverage industry includes his most recent position as Executive Vice President of Sovos Brands from January 2021, where he managed the Breakfast and Snacks Group. Mr. Vieth’s prior experience includes nearly a decade spent at WhiteWave Foods from January 2008 to April 2017, most recently as Senior Vice President and General Manager of the yogurt business that included Horizon Organic, Wallaby Organic, Silk and So Delicious. In addition, he has led other food and beverage businesses such as Poppi, a producer of prebiotic soda, from April 2019 to January 2020, and Lifetime Fitness’ Life Café from April 2017 to April 2020. In addition, Mr. Vieth has nearly a decade of management consulting experience between The Boston Consulting Group and Accenture. Mr. Vieth holds a B.S. in Finance from Miami University and an M.B.A. from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University.
Director Qualifications
The nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board is tasked with annually considering the size, composition, and needs of the Board and, as appropriate, recommending the nominees for directors to the Board for approval. The nominating and corporate governance committee considers and evaluates suggestions from many sources regarding possible candidates for directors. Below are the general criteria for the evaluation of current and proposed directors:
high standards of integrity, commitment and independence of thought, and judgment;
diversity of talent, skill, and expertise sufficient to provide sound and prudent guidance with respect to all of our operations and interests, which may include experience at senior levels of business, or health-related endeavors;
confidence and a willingness to express ideas and engage in constructive discussion with other Board members, management, and all relevant persons;
ability to devote sufficient time, energy, and attention to corporate affairs;
active participation in the decision-making process, willingness to make difficult decisions in our best interest and the interests of our shareholders and demonstrate diligence and faithfulness in attending Board and Committee meetings; and
freedom from any conflict of interest that would impair the director’s ability to fulfill the responsibilities of a member of the Board.
We have no formal policy regarding board diversity; however, a diverse board is an objective of the Company. The Board evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of assembling a group that can best maximize the success of the business and represent shareholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment using its diversity of experience in these various areas. There are no family relationships between our executive officers and directors.
Shareholder Nominations
The nominating and corporate governance committee will review and evaluate candidates submitted by shareholders for election to the Board, taking into consideration whether nominations are in accordance with the procedures to nominate directors set forth in our bylaws.
Executive Officers of the Company
The following table sets forth the name, age, and position of each of our executive officers as of March 26, 2026:
Name
Position
Age
Chief Executive Officer and Director
Anya Hamill
Chief Financial Officer
Co-Founder, Chief Innovator and Director
62
Jason Vieth — For biographical information, see “Directors of the Company.”
Laird Hamilton — For biographical information, see “Directors of the Company.”
Anya Hamill was appointed as the Company’s interim Chief Financial Officer, effective July 1, 2022, and was appointed the permanent CFO on November 4, 2022. Ms. Hamill possesses more than 20 years of strategic finance experience in both public CPG and private equity-backed emerging companies in the natural foods and beverages space. Ms. Hamill joined the Company as Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis in April 2022 from Little Secrets Chocolate, where she served as chief financial officer from September 2018. Previously, Ms. Hamill served as the Senior Director of Finance, Premium Yogurt at Danone North America from May 2017 through March 2018, and as a Senior Director of Finance, Plant-based beverage and food division and various other finance and accounting roles at WhiteWave Foods from March 2003 through May 2017. Ms. Hamill holds an MBA with a finance concentration from Leeds School of Business at the University of Colorado and a Bachelor of Arts from Saint-Petersburg State University of Engineering and Economics.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our directors, officers, and employees, including those officers responsible for financial reporting. A current copy of the code of business conduct and ethics is available under the Governance section of our website at lairdsuperfood.com. We intend to disclose future amendments to the code or any waivers of its requirements on our website.
Identification of Audit Committee and Financial Expert
The Board has established an audit committee composed solely of independent directors. The members of the audit committee are identified below.
The Board has determined that each of the members of our audit committee satisfies the financial literacy and sophistication requirements of the SEC and the NYSE American listing rules. In addition, the Board has determined that each of Mr. Graves and Ms. Naylor qualifies as an audit committee financial expert under SEC and NYSE American rules. Under SEC rules, members of our audit committee must also meet heightened independence standards. The Board has determined that each of the members of our audit committee is independent under the applicable SEC and NYSE American listing rules.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers and directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our ordinary shares to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of such ordinary shares with the SEC. These persons are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms we have received, we believe that all required Section 16(a) reports were timely filed during our fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, except for late Form 4 filings by (i) Jason Vieth on April 11, 2025, and (ii) Anya Hamill on November 7, 2025, each with respect to withholding shares of the Company’s common stock to satisfy taxes.
Other Programs and Policies
Insider Trading Policy
Under our Insider Trading Policy, our directors, executive officers, and other employees are prohibited from engaging in short-term trading or short sales and are prohibited from participating in transactions in put options, call options or other derivative securities. While the Company is not subject to the insider trading policy, the Company does not trade in its securities when it is in possession of material nonpublic information other than pursuant to previously adopted Rule 10b5-1 trading plans.
Anti-hedging and Anti-pledging Policy
The Company strongly discourages hedging transactions. Any person wishing to enter into such an arrangement must first submit the proposed transaction for approval by the designated compliance officer, who will have sole discretion to decide whether to approve the proposed transaction. In addition, our directors, executive officers, and other employees are prohibited from holding our securities in a margin account and from pledging our securities as collateral for a loan, except as may be pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
Timing of Equity Awards
Equity awards are generally made once each fiscal year in the first quarter to employees and in the second quarter to the Board. This timing does not follow a pre-determined schedule but is rather determined by the Board each year. The Board is mindful of material non-public information when scheduling such awards, avoiding award dates that would too closely precede public filings. Equity awards may also be made to new employees as part of the onboarding process.
Compensation Recoupment Policy
Our Incentive Compensation Recovery Policy requires the recovery of excess incentive compensation from executives if an accounting restatement is necessary due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements. This policy applies to all incentive compensation received during the recoupment period by executives who served during the performance period for that compensation, even if they are no longer with the Company at the time of recovery. Incentive compensation is considered "received" in the fiscal period when the financial reporting measure is achieved, regardless of when the payment is made. Exceptions to recovery are allowed if it is impracticable due to excessive recovery costs, legal violations, or potential impacts on tax-qualified retirement plans. The Compensation Committee has full authority to interpret and administer the policy, ensuring compliance with NYSE American and SEC regulations. The policy also prohibits indemnification or advancement of legal fees for executives opposing recovery efforts.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
This section discusses the material components of the executive compensation program for our named executive officers (“NEOs”) who are named in the “Summary Compensation Table” below. As an “emerging growth company” and a “smaller reporting company,” each as defined in federal securities laws, we are not required to include a Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and have elected to comply with the scaled disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies.
Introduction
The information that follows provides an overview of the compensation provided to our NEOs who are listed in the table below for the period of January 1, 2024 through December 31, 2025 (referred to herein as “fiscal 2025” or “fiscal 2024”).
Overall Philosophy and Objectives of Our Executive Compensation Programs
The overall philosophy of our compensation programs for the NEOs and other senior executives is to encourage and reward the creation of sustainable, long-term shareholder value. We identified the following objectives to help realize this goal:
Alignment with Shareholders
Reward performance in a given year and achievements over a sustained period that are aligned with our shareholders’ interests.
Remain Competitive
Attract, retain, and motivate the exceptional talent required to ensure our continued success.
Motivate Performance
Ensure that the compensation program reinforces execution of overall strategy and achievement of our business objectives.
Reward Superior Performance
Reinforce our pay-for-performance, entrepreneurial culture.
Elements of Compensation
The compensation program for our NEOs consists of the following elements of compensation, each described in greater depth below:
base salaries;
performance-based bonuses; and
equity-based incentive compensation.
Base Salary
Base salaries are an annual fixed level of cash compensation that reflect each NEO’s role and responsibilities, and regional market considerations.
The base salaries for our NEOs for fiscal 2025 are listed in the table below:
Title
2025 Salary
Chief Executive Officer
Anya Hamill (1)
Laird Hamilton (2)
Equity-Based Incentive Compensation
We pay equity-based compensation to our NEOs to link the long-term results achieved for our shareholders and the rewards provided to NEOs, thereby ensuring that such NEOs have a continuing stake in our long-term success. For fiscal 2025, annual equity awards were delivered on April 1, 2025, in the form of RSUs. The RSUs provided to our NEOs vest ratably over four years.
Determining Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee, guided by the principal objectives described in this section, approves the structure of the executive compensation program, and administers the programs for our executive officers. The following describes the roles of key participants in the process.
Role of our Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee has the responsibility to make and approve changes in the total compensation of our executive officers, including the mix of compensation elements and compensation values.
Role of our Compensation Consultant
The Company engages FW Cook & Co. (“FW Cook”) to provide independent external advice regarding executive compensation and to provide a competitive market pay analysis for our NEOs. Neither FW Cook nor any of its affiliates maintain other direct or indirect business relationships with the Company or any of its affiliates other than the services provided to the Compensation Committee.
Peer Group
The Compensation Committee approved a peer group consisting of 17 companies that was used for benchmarking fiscal 2021 compensation. Given the Company’s size, product offerings, and unique market position, there are no direct competitors in the compensation peer group. Criteria used to identify the peer group companies include:
Size – companies with revenue that generally range from 0.2x to 5x our total annual revenue.
Business Focus – companies that are publicly traded and primarily in the foods, beverage, and tobacco industry.
The 17-company peer group consists of the companies listed below:
22nd Century
Alico
Bridgford Foods
Celsius
Coffee Holding
Craft Brew Alliance
Crimson Wine
Lifeway Foods
Limoneira
MamaMancini's
MGP Ingredients
NewAge
RiceBran Tech
Rocky Mtn Choc. Factory
S&W Seed
South Dakota Soybean
Willamette Val. Vineyards
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our NEOs for the year ended December 31, 2025 and 2024.
Name and Principal Position
Year
Salary ($)
Bonus ($)
Option Awards ($) (1)
Stock Awards ($) (2)
Total ($)
Jason Vieth, CEO
Anya Hamill, CFO
Laird Hamilton, Chief Innovator
The amounts show in this column represent the aggregate grant-date fair value of stock options granted under our 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan (as amended, the "2020 Plan") to our NEOs, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The valuation assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the stock options are set forth in Note 10 to our audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
This column reflects the aggregate grant date fair value of RSUs granted under our 2020 Plan to our NEOs, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The valuation assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the RSUs are set forth in Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Employment Arrangements
We have entered into employment agreements with Mr. Vieth and Ms. Hamill. Mr. Hamilton is currently not a party to an employment agreement with the Company. The employment agreements do not provide for a fixed employment term and set forth the executive’s annual salary, target bonus, if any, eligibility for employee benefits, the terms of equity grants, customary proprietary information assignment provisions, and non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions. The key terms of employment with our named executive officers with employment agreements are further described below.
In connection with Mr. Vieth’s appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer, the Company entered into an employment agreement (the “Vieth Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Vieth that provides for the following benefits, among other provisions:
an annual base salary of $400,000;
an annual bonus opportunity of up to 100% of base salary based on the achievement of performance goals, with a target payout of 50% of base salary;
a $114,000 signing bonus subject to repayment if Mr. Vieth voluntarily resigns without good reason (as defined in the Vieth Employment Agreement) or the Company terminates Mr. Vieth’s employment for cause (as defined in the Vieth Employment Agreement) prior to the first anniversary of the Vieth Employment Agreement;
RSUs relating to 125,000 shares of common stock, vesting over four years;
stock options to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $25.00 per share, and stock options to purchase 150,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price equal to the grant date fair value of the Company’s common stock, in each case vesting 25% on the first anniversary of the effective date of the Vieth Employment Agreement and ratably thereafter over the following 12 quarters (such stock options together with the RSUs in the preceding bullet, the “Inducement Grants”); and
a payment equal to 12 months base salary and COBRA coverage for up to 12 months if Mr. Vieth resigns for good reason or the Company terminates Mr. Vieth’s employment without cause, or, if such resignation or termination occurs within two years following a change in control (as defined in the Vieth Employment Agreement), a payment equal to 24 months base salary, COBRA coverage for up to 18 months, the vesting of all of Mr. Vieth’s equity awards, and a cash payment equal to $1,000,000 less the fair market value of the Inducement Grants at the time of the change in control.
Mr. Vieth’s salary was adjusted to $500,000 with an effective date of May 1, 2024. Mr. Vieth is also eligible to participate in the Company’s equity incentive plans and long-term incentive plans and other benefits available to the Company’s executive officers. In addition, the Company entered into an indemnification agreement with Mr. Vieth on terms substantially similar to the terms of the form of indemnification agreement filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed on September 10, 2020.
In connection with Ms. Hamill’s appointment as Chief Financial Officer, the Company entered into an employment agreement (the “Hamill Employment Agreement”) with Anya Hamill that provides for the following benefits, among other provisions:
an annual base salary of $275,000;
RSUs relating to 50,000 shares of common stock, vesting over four years;
stock options to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price equal to the grant date fair value of the Company’s common stock, vesting over four years; and
a payment equal to 12 months base salary and COBRA coverage for up to 12 months if Ms. Hamill resigns for good reason or the Company terminates Ms. Hamill’s employment without cause, and, if such resignation or termination occurs within two years following a change in control (as defined in the Hamill Employment Agreement), the vesting of all of Ms. Hamill’s equity awards.
Ms. Hamill’s salary was adjusted to $300,000 with an effective date of May 1, 2024, and subsequently adjusted to $325,000 with an effective date of July 1, 2025. Ms. Hamill is also eligible to participate in the Company’s equity incentive plans and long-term incentive plans and other benefits available to the Company’s executive officers. In addition, the Company entered into an indemnification agreement with Ms. Hamill on terms substantially similar to the terms of the form of indemnification agreement filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed on September 10, 2020.
Retirement Plans
We have not maintained, and do not currently intend to maintain, a defined benefit pension plan or non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
Outstanding Equity Awards and Year-End
The following table provides information regarding equity awards held by our NEOs that were outstanding as of December 31, 2025:
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Number of securities underlying unexercised options
exercisable
unexercisable
Option exercise price ($)
Option expiration date
Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#)
Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested ($) (1)
(2)
1/31/2032
(3)
2/3/2032
(7)
4/3/2033
(8)
2/23/2034
(4)
5/5/2032
(5)
(6)
11/4/2032
(11)
(9)
2/24/2026
(10)
2/22/2028
2/1/2031
The market value of unvested awards is calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares held by the applicable named executive officer by the closing sales price of our common stock on December 31, 2025, the last trading day of the year, which was $2.22.
These awards vest in four equal annual tranches ending January 31, 2026.
These awards vest in four equal annual tranches ending February 3, 2026.
These awards vested on May 5, 2023.
These awards vest in four equal annual tranches ending May 5, 2026.
These awards vest in four equal annual tranches ending November 4, 2026.
These awards vest in four equal annual tranches ending April 4, 2027.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Program
At the time of our IPO, we adopted a non-employee director compensation plan covering non-employee directors. Under the plan, each non-employee director covered by the plan will receive an annual cash retainer and an annual grant of stock options and/or RSUs for board service, and if such non-employee director serves as a committee chair or a lead independent director, an additional annual cash retainer for such committee chair or lead independent director service. The Board has currently fixed the cash retainer for board service for non-employee directors at $45,000 per year, and the additional cash retainer for service as chairman of the Board or as lead independent director at $25,000 per year. The cash retainer for service as a member on a committee is fixed at $4,000 per year for each of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee and $7,000 per year for the Audit Committee, with an extra $4,000 per year for the chairs of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee and $7,000 per year for the chair of the Audit Committee. Cash retainers are paid quarterly in arrears, and directors joining mid-year have their cash retainers prorated for actual service. Each non-employee director will receive an annual retainer equity award issued under the 2020 Plan with the value of $55,000 on the grant date, which vests after one year. Each non-employee director may choose to have their equity awarded as stock options, RSUs, or a 50/50 split. Non-employee directors joining mid-year will be provided a prorated annual award for the number of full months of expected service until the next annual shareholder meeting. Such grant will have the other terms provided for in the 2020 Plan and the award agreement providing for such grant. Directors who are also employees, such as Messrs. Vieth and Hamilton, did not and will not receive any compensation for their services as directors.
Effective March 12, 2026, the Board approved an updated non-employee director compensation policy. Pursuant to the updated non-employee director compensation policy, each non-employee director of the Company will be paid an annual cash retainer of $50,000. The chairperson of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Nominating Committee will each be paid an annual cash retainer of $10,000. Members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating Committee will each be paid an annual cash retainer of $10,000, in addition to any cash retainer received for service as a committee chairperson. Each non-employee director is also eligible to receive an annual equity award under the Laird Superfood, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan with a value of $90,000, which will vest in full one year from the date of grant. Each non-employee director may choose to have their equity awarded as stock options, restricted stock units, or a 50/50 split. Mr. Behrens and Ms. Patrick will receive the Company’s standard compensation pursuant to the updated non-employee director compensation policy. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Mr. Cohen and Mrs. Dean Obia will not receive compensation in their capacities as directors of the Company.
No per meeting fees are paid, except that we reimburse non-employee directors for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attending board and committee meetings.
All stock awards granted pursuant to the Non-Employee Director Compensation Program are subject to the terms and provisions of the Laird Superfood, Inc. 2020 Plan.
Director Compensation Table
The table below sets forth information on the compensation of all our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2025. Jason Vieth, our Chief Executive Officer, and Laird Hamilton, our Chief Innovator, were also members of the Board in fiscal 2025 but did not receive any additional compensation for service as a director.
Fees earned or paid in cash
Stock awards (1)
Geoffrey T. Barker (2)
Patrick Gaston (2)
The amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of the awards as calculated under FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in valuing awards reported in these columns are discussed in Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Outstanding Equity Awards for Directors at Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information regarding equity awards held by our non-employee directors that were outstanding as of December 31, 2025:
Options Outstanding
RSUs Outstanding
#
Geoffrey T. Barker (1)
Patrick Gaston (1)
Role of the Board in Risk Oversight
The Board administers its role in the oversight of risk directly through the Board as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of the Board that address risks inherent in their respective areas. In particular, the Board monitors and assesses strategic risk exposure and our audit committee oversees our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures. Our audit committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including our food safety program, and considers and approves or disapproves any related person transactions. Our nominating and corporate governance committee monitors the effectiveness of our corporate governance practices and of the Board. Our compensation committee assesses and monitors whether any of our compensation policies and programs have the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. While each committee evaluates certain risks and oversees the management of such risks, our entire Board is regularly informed about the risks overseen by the committees through committee reports.
Risk assessment and oversight are an integral part of our governance and management processes. The Board encourages management to promote a culture that incorporates risk management into our corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. Management discusses strategic and operational risks at regular management meetings and conducts specific strategic planning and review sessions during the year that include a focused discussion and analysis of the risks facing us. Throughout the year, senior management reviews these risks with the Board at regular board meetings as part of management presentations that focus on particular business functions, operations or strategies and presents the steps taken by management to mitigate or eliminate such risks.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
Ownership of Company Common Stock
The following table sets forth information concerning the “beneficial ownership” of our common stock as of March 23, 2026 by (i) those persons who we know to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock; (ii) the NEOs listed in the Summary Compensation Table; and (iii) all of our current directors and executive officers as a group. Under SEC rules, “beneficial ownership” for purposes of this table takes into account shares as to which the individual has or shares voting and/or investment power as well as shares that may be acquired within 60 days (such as by exercising vested stock options) and is different from beneficial ownership for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act, which may result in a number that is different than the beneficial ownership number reported in forms filed pursuant to Section 16. The percentage of shares beneficially owned is computed on the basis of 10,925,218 shares of our common stock outstanding on March 23, 2026. An asterisk in the percent of class column indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1%. The beneficial owners listed have sole voting and investment power with respect to shares beneficially owned, except as to the interests of spouses or as otherwise indicated. Except as set forth below, the address for each beneficial owner listed is c/o Laird Superfood, Inc, 5303 Spine Road, Suite 204, Boulder, Colorado 80301.
Name of Beneficial Owner
Number of Outstanding Shares Beneficially Owned
Number of Shares Exercisable Within 60 Days
Series A Preferred Stock (2)
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned
Percent of Class
Named Executive Officers
Non-Employee Directors
Geoffrey Barker
Patrick Gaston
All current directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons)
Other 5% Shareholders
Danone Manifesto Ventures, PBC (1)
Nexus Capital Management LP (2)
*Indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the total outstanding stock.
(1) Based solely on information contained in a Schedule 13G filed on October 2, 2020. Danone Manifesto Ventures, PBC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Danone North America Public Benefit Corporation, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Compagnie Gervais Danone S.A., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Danone S.A. Decisions regarding the voting or disposition of shares held by Danone Manifesto Ventures, PBC are made by the management of Danone Manifesto Ventures, PBC, provided that Danone S.A. may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by Danone Manifesto Ventures, PBC. The address of Danone Manifesto Ventures, PBC and Danone North America Public Benefit Corporation is c/o Danone Manifesto Ventures, PBC, 12 West 21st St., 12th Floor, New York, New York 10010, and the address of Danone S.A. and Compagnie Gervais Danone S.A. is c/o Danone S.A., 17 boulevard Haussmann, 75009 Paris, France.
(2) Represents shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock purchased for $50.0 million that are convertible, at the holder’s option, into shares of common stock at a fixed conversion price of $3.57 per share, subject to customary anti‑dilution adjustments. The Series A Preferred Stock votes on an as‑converted basis, subject to certain conditions, and accrues dividends at an annual rate of 5.0%.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2025 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.
Number of securities available for
Number of Shares to
future issuance under
be issued upon
Weighted average
equity compensation
exercise of
exercise price of
plans (excluding
outstanding options,
outstanding options and
securities reflected in
and rights (#)
rights ($) (1)
column (a)) (#) (2)
Equity Compensation plans approved by security holders
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
(1) Reflects the weighted-average exercise prices of outstanding options. There is no exercise price for outstanding RSUs or RSAs.
(2) Reflects shares of common stock reserved for issuance under our 2020 Plan. The number of shares reserved for issuance under our 2020 Plan automatically increases on the first day of each fiscal year, beginning with the 2021 fiscal year, by a number equal to four percent of the shares of common stock outstanding on the final day of the prior calendar year or such smaller number of shares as determined by the Company.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions
We adopted a written related person transaction policy, effective upon the closing of our IPO, setting forth the policies and procedures for the review and approval or ratification of related person transactions. This policy covers, with certain exceptions set forth in Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act, any transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements, or relationships in which we were or are to be a participant, where the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 and 1% of the average of the Company’s total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and a related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. Types of transactions covered by this policy include, without limitation, purchases of goods or services by or from the related person or entities in which the related person has a material interest, indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness, and employment by us of a related person. In reviewing and approving any such transactions, our audit committee is tasked to consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including but not limited to whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in an arm’s length transaction with an unrelated third-party and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction.
Related Person Transactions
Except as described below, there have been no transactions since January 1, 2024 to which we have been or are to be a participant, in which the amount exceeds the lesser of $120,000 and 1% of the average of the Company’s total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any of our directors, executive officers, or beneficial owners of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, or any immediate family member of or person sharing a household with any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, other than employment relationships with our executive officers and compensation to our directors.
Agreement with Gabrielle Reece
On October 26, 2022, the Company executed an influencer agreement with Gabrielle Reece, the wife of Mr. Hamilton, our cofounder and Chief Innovator, to provide certain marketing services for an original term ended December 31, 2023. The Company did not formally extend the agreement, however, both parties have verbally agreed to continue operating under the terms of the agreement throughout 2025. In connection with these services, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, the Company paid Ms. Reece approximately $309,805.
Director Independence
The Board has determined that none of our directors other than Mr. Vieth, who is our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Hamilton, who is our Chief Innovator, and Mr. Cohen and Ms. Dean Obia, who are employees of Nexus Capital Management LP, has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, and that Messrs. Behrens, Graves, and LaMontagne and Mses. Naylor and Patrick are “independent” as that term is defined under NYSE American rules. In making these determinations, the Board considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances deemed relevant in determining their independence, including the beneficial ownership of our capital stock by each non-employee director.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
Relationship with Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table shows the fees that were billed to us in connection with our financial statement audits for fiscal years 2025 and 2024 by KPMG LLC (“KPMG”) and Baker Tilly US LLP (“Baker Tilly”), respectively:
Fee Category
Audit Fees
Audit-Related Fees
Tax Fees
All Other Fees
Total Fees
“Audit Fees” includes fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements, review of quarterly consolidated financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K, as well as services that are normally provided by our auditors in connection with SEC filings, including comfort letters and consents issued in connection with securities offerings, consultations on matters addressed during the audit or interim reviews, and other services normally provided in connection with regulatory filings.
“Audit-Related Fees” includes fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not included above under “Audit Fees.”
“Tax Fees” includes fees for professional services provided for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.
“All Other Fees” includes fees for services provided that are not included in the other fee categories reported above.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
Our auditors provide the audit committee with information outlining the plan and scope of their proposed audit services to be performed during the year, which the audit committee reviews with our auditors and management. The audit committee pre-approves all services provided by our auditors, including audit services and non-audit services, to assure that they do not impair our auditors’ independence. Audit committee pre-approval requirements are subject to an exception for certain de minimis non-audit services approved by the audit committee prior to the completion of an audit. None of the services in 2025 and 2024 were approved by the audit committee pursuant to the de minimis exception. To ensure prompt handling of unexpected matters, the audit committee has specifically delegated to the Chair of the audit committee authority to pre-approve permissible non-audit services, subject to maximum dollar amounts. If the Chair exercises this delegation of authority, he reports the action taken to the audit committee at its next regular meeting.
PART IV.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
(a)(1) Consolidated Financial Statements
See Index to Financial Consolidated Statements in Item 8 of this report.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
All financial statement schedules have been omitted as the information is not required under the related instructions or is not applicable or because the information required is already included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes those consolidated financial statements.
(a)(3) EXHIBITS.
The documents set forth below are filed herewith or incorporated herein by reference to the location indicated.
Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit Number
Description
Form
File No.
Exhibit
Filing Date
Filed / Furnished Herewith
3.1
8-K
001-39537
1/2/2024
3.3
Bylaws of Laird Superfood, Inc.
3.2
4.1
Form of Stock Certificate for Common Stock.
10-K
3/13/2024
4.2
Stockholder Agreement dated April 13, 2020, between the Company and Danone Manifesto Ventures, PBC.
S-1
333-248513
4.3
8/31/2020
Description of Capital Stock.
10.3#
Laird Superfood, Inc. 2020 Omnibus Incentive Plan.
S-8
333-248985
99.3
9/23/2020
10.14
License and Preservation Agreement dated May 26, 2020, by and among the Company, Laird Hamilton, and Gabrielle Reece.
10.12
21.1
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
23.1
Consent of KPMG, LLP.
X
24.1
Power of Attorney (included in signature page).
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
32.1*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
* The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 and 32.2 are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not incorporated by reference into any of the Company’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such.
# Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
† Certain schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. A copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit will be furnished supplementally to the SEC or its staff upon request.
ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant)
Date: March 30, 2026
/s/ Jason Vieth
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Anya Hamill
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
/s/ Doug Behrens
/s/ Michael Cohen
Michael Cohen
/s/ Greg Graves
/s/ Laird Hamilton
/s/ Grant LaMontagne
/s/ Maile Naylor
/s/ Kayla Dean Obia
/s/ Kristen Patrick
Kristen Patrick