UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2007
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission file number 1-9466
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
13-3216325
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
745 Seventh Avenue, New York, New York
10019
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(212) 526-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨No x
As of June 30, 2007, 530,785,548 shares of the Registrants Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, were outstanding.
[This page intentionally left blank.]
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC.
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MAY 31, 2007
Contents
Page
Number
Available Information
2
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements(unaudited)
Consolidated Statement of Income
Three and Six months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006
3
Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition
May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006
4
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Six months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006
6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
43
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
44
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
81
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
82
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
83
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
84
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
85
Item 6.
Exhibits
86
Signature
87
Exhibit Index
88
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Holdings) files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). You may read and copy any document Holdings files with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549, U.S.A. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 (or 1-202-551-8090). The SEC maintains an internet site that contains annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. Holdings electronic SEC filings are available to the public at http://www.sec.gov.
Holdings public internet site is http://www.lehman.com. Holdings makes available free of charge through its internet site, via a link to the SECs internet site at http://www.sec.gov, its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as soon as reasonably practicable after it electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC. Holdings also makes available through its internet site, via a link to the SECs internet site, statements of beneficial ownership of Holdings equity securities filed by its directors, officers, 10% or greater shareholders and others under Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
In addition, Holdings currently makes available on http://www.lehman.com its most recent annual report on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the current fiscal year, its most recent proxy statement and its most recent annual report to stockholders, although in some cases these documents are not available on that site as soon as they are available on the SECs site.
Holdings also makes available on http://www.lehman.com (i) its Corporate Governance Guidelines, (ii) its Code of Ethics (including any waivers therefrom granted to executive officers or directors) and (iii) the charters of the Audit, Compensation and Benefits, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees of its Board of Directors. These documents are also available in print without charge to any person who requests them by writing or telephoning:
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.Office of the Corporate Secretary1301 Avenue of the Americas5th FloorNew York, New York 10019, U.S.A.1-212-526-0858
In order to view and print the documents referred to above (which are in the .PDF format) on Holdings internet site, you will need to have installed on your computer the Adobe® Reader® software. If you do not have Adobe Reader, a link to Adobe Systems Incorporateds internet site, from which you can download the software, is provided.
ECAPS is a registered trademark of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
MCAPS is a service mark of Lehman Brothers Inc.
- 2 -
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC.PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT of INCOME(Unaudited)
Three MonthsEnded May 31,
Six MonthsEnded May 31,
In millions, except per share data
2007
2006
Revenues
Principal transactions
$
2,889
2,589
5,810
5,051
Investment banking
1,150
741
2,000
1,576
Commissions
568
512
1,108
1,000
Interest and dividends
10,558
7,327
19,647
13,519
Asset management and other
414
346
809
676
Total revenues
15,579
11,515
29,374
21,822
Interest expense
10,067
7,104
18,815
12,950
Net revenues
5,512
4,411
10,559
8,872
Non-Interest Expenses
Compensation and benefits
2,718
2,175
5,206
4,374
Technology and communications
287
238
553
466
Brokerage, clearance and distribution fees
201
158
395
299
Occupancy
152
139
298
280
Professional fees
120
218
155
Business development
100
74
184
134
Other
55
46
127
115
Total non-personnel expenses
915
738
1,775
1,449
Total non-interest expenses
3,633
2,913
6,981
5,823
Income before taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change
1,879
1,498
3,578
3,049
Provision for income taxes
606
496
1,159
1,009
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
1,273
1,002
2,419
2,040
Cumulative effect of accounting change
47
Net income
2,087
Net income applicable to common stock
1,256
986
2,385
2,055
Earnings per basic common share:
Before cumulative effect of accounting change
2.33
1.81
4.42
3.67
0.09
Earnings per basic common share
3.76
Earnings per diluted common share:
2.21
1.69
4.17
3.44
0.08
Earnings per diluted common share
3.52
Dividends paid per common share
0.15
0.12
0.30
0.24
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 3 -
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT of FINANCIAL CONDITION(Unaudited)
May 31,
November 30,
In millions
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
5,293
5,987
Cash and securities segregated and on deposit for regulatory and other purposes
7,154
6,091
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:(includes $67,572 in 2007 and $42,600 in 2006 pledged as collateral)
285,684
226,596
Securities received as collateral
8,317
6,099
Collateralized agreements:
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
130,953
117,490
Securities borrowed
118,118
101,567
Receivables:
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
7,365
7,449
Customers
26,924
18,470
Others
2,859
2,052
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements(net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $2,197 in 2007 and $1,925 in 2006)
3,519
3,269
Other assets
6,023
5,113
Identifiable intangible assets and goodwill(net of accumulated amortization of $320 in 2007 and $293 in 2006)
3,652
3,362
Total assets
605,861
503,545
- 4 -
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC.CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT of FINANCIAL CONDITION(Continued)(Unaudited)
In millions, except share data
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term borrowings (including $5,823 in 2007 and $3,783 in 2006 at fair value)
$ 27,712
$ 20,638
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased
168,015
125,960
Obligation to return securities received as collateral
Collateralized financings:
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
137,948
133,547
Securities loaned
27,942
17,883
Other secured borrowings
26,639
19,028
Payables:
2,498
2,217
47,973
41,695
Accrued liabilities and other payables
15,172
14,697
Deposits at banks(including $12,487 in 2007 and $0 in 2006 at fair value)
21,697
21,412
Long-term borrowings(including $20,979 in 2007 and $11,025 in 2006 at fair value)
100,819
81,178
Total liabilities
584,732
484,354
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders Equity
Preferred stock
1,095
Common stock, $0.10 par value:
Shares authorized: 1,200,000,000 in 2007 and 2006;
Shares issued: 610,865,692 in 2007 and 609,832,302 in 2006;
Shares outstanding: 530,153,162 in 2007 and 533,368,195 in 2006
61
Additional paid-in capital
9,610
8,727
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax
(5
)
(15
Retained earnings
18,133
15,857
Other stockholders equity, net
(2,205
(1,712
Common stock in treasury, at cost: 80,712,530 shares in 2007 and 76,464,107 shares in 2006
(5,560
(4,822
Total common stockholders equity
20,034
18,096
Total stockholders equity
21,129
19,191
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
$605,861
$503,545
- 5 -
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT of CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended May 31,
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
$ 2,419
$ 2,087
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
284
250
Non-cash compensation
631
500
(47
Other adjustments
(32
(197
Net change in:
(1,063
(1,066
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned
(56,923
(18,144
Resale agreements, net of repurchase agreements
(9,063
8,743
Securities borrowed, net of securities loaned
(6,492
(14,564
7,611
(8,023
Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
(452
Receivables from customers
(8,454
(9,092
41,929
11,087
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
281
1,303
Payables to customers
6,278
5,494
1,008
(653
Other receivables and assets and minority interests
(2,313
(75
Net cash used in operating activities
(23,815
(22,849
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchase of property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net
(447
(233
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
(461
(106
Proceeds from sale of business
65
Net cash used in investing activities
(843
(339
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Derivative contracts with a financing element
126
150
Tax benefit from the issuance of stock-based awards
225
328
Issuance of short-term borrowings, net
2,684
1,591
Deposits at banks
(598
4,719
Issuance of long-term borrowings
39,824
26,868
Principal payments of long-term borrowings, including the current portion of long term borrowings
(16,315
(9,585
Issuance of common stock
28
111
Issuance of treasury stock
240
313
Purchase of treasury stock
(2,039
(1,577
Dividends paid
(211
(173
Net cash provided by financing activities
23,964
22,745
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
(694
(443
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
4,900
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$ 5,293
$ 4,457
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information (in millions):
Interest paid totaled $19,102 and $12,803 in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Income taxes paid totaled $886 and $404 in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
- 6 -
Note 1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
8
Note 2
Business Segments and Geographic Information
14
Note 3
Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions
17
Note 4
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
18
Note 5
Securities Received and Pledged as Collateral
21
Note 6
Securitizations and Special Purpose Entities
22
Note 7
Borrowings and Deposit Liabilities
26
Note 8
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
27
Note 9
Earnings per Common Share and Stockholders Equity
31
Note 10
Share-Based Employee Incentive Plans
32
Note 11
Employee Benefit Plans
35
Note 12
Regulatory Requirements
36
Note 13
Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
37
- 7 -
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Holdings) and subsidiaries (collectively, the Company, Lehman Brothers, we, us or our). The principal U.S., European, and Asian subsidiaries of Holdings are Lehman Brothers Inc. (LBI), a U.S. registered broker-dealer, Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (LBIE) and Lehman Brothers Europe Limited, authorized investment firms in the United Kingdom, and Lehman Brothers Japan (LBJ), a registered securities company in Japan.
These Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) with respect to Form 10-Q. All material inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation and all normal recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented are reflected. Certain prior-period amounts reflect reclassifications to conform to the presentation in current periods.
These Consolidated Financial Statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto (the 2006 Consolidated Financial Statements) included in Holdings Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006 (the Form 10-K). The Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at November 30, 2006 included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2007 was derived from the 2006 Consolidated Financial Statements.
The nature of our business is such that the results of any interim period may vary significantly from quarter to quarter and may not be predictive of the results for the fiscal year.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Holdings and its subsidiaries, when appropriate.
Operating companies. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN) No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entitiesan interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN 46(R)), defines the criteria necessary for an entity to be considered an operating company (i.e., a voting-interest entity) for which the consolidation accounting guidance of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 94, Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries(SFAS 94) should be applied. As required by SFAS 94, we consolidate operating companies in which we have a controlling financial interest. The usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority of the voting interest. FIN 46(R) defines operating companies as businesses that have sufficient legal equity to absorb the entities expected losses and for which the equity holders have substantive voting rights and participate substantively in the gains and losses of such entities. Operating companies in which we exercise significant influence but do not have a controlling financial interest are accounted for under the equity method. Significant influence generally is considered to exist when we own 20% to 50% of the voting equity of a corporation, or when we hold at least 3% of a limited partnership interest.
Special purpose entities. Special purpose entities (SPEs) are corporations, trusts or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. There are two types of SPEsqualified SPEs (QSPEs) and variable interest entities (VIEs).
A QSPE generally can be described as an entity whose permitted activities are limited to passively holding financial assets and distributing cash flows to investors based on pre-set terms. Our primary involvement with QSPEs relates to securitization transactions in which transferred assets, including mortgages, loans, receivables and other financial assets are sold to an SPE that qualifies as a QSPE under SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities(SFAS 140). In accordance with SFAS 140, we do not consolidate QSPEs. We recognize at fair value the interests we hold in the QSPEs. We derecognize financial assets transferred, provided we have surrendered control over the assets.
Certain SPEs do not meet the QSPE criteria because their permitted activities are not sufficiently limited or because their assets are not qualifying financial instruments (e.g., real estate). These SPEs are referred to as VIEs and we typically use them to create securities with a unique risk profile desired by investors to intermediate financial risk or to invest in real estate. We establish VIEs, sell assets to VIEs, underwrite, distribute, and make a market in securities issued by VIEs, transact derivatives with VIEs, own interests in VIEs, and provide liquidity or other guarantees to
- 8 -
VIEs. Under FIN 46(R), we consolidate a VIE if we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is the party that has a majority of the expected losses or a majority of the expected residual returns, or both, of the entity.
For a further discussion of our securitization activities and our involvement with VIEs, see Note 6, Securitizations and Special Purpose Entities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes, management makes various estimates that affect reported amounts and disclosures. Those estimates are used in:
· measuring fair value of certain financial instruments;
· accounting for identifiable intangible assets and goodwill;
· establishing provisions for potential losses that may arise from litigation, regulatory proceedings and tax examinations;
· assessing our ability to realize deferred taxes; and
· valuing equity-based compensation awards.
Estimates are based on available information and judgment. Therefore, actual results could differ from our estimates and that difference could have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto.
Principal transactions.Gains or losses from Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased are reflected in Principal transactions in the Consolidated Statement of Income as incurred.
Investment banking. Underwriting revenues, net of related underwriting expenses, and revenues for merger and acquisition advisory and other investment banking-related services are recognized when services for the transactions are completed. In instances where our Investment Banking segment provides structuring services and/or advice in a capital markets-related transaction, we record a portion of the transaction-related revenue as Investment Banking fees.
Commissions. Commissions primarily include fees from executing and clearing client transactions on stocks, options and futures markets worldwide. These fees are recognized on a trade-date basis.
Interest and dividends revenue and interest expense. We recognize contractual interest on Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased, excluding derivatives, on an accrual basis as a component of Interest and dividends revenue and Interest expense, respectively. We account for our secured financing activities and certain short- and long-term borrowings on an accrual basis with related interest recorded as interest revenue or interest expense, as applicable. Interest paid on deposit liabilities and structured notes are components of Interest and dividends expense.
Asset management and other. Investment advisory fees are recorded as earned. In certain circumstances, we receive asset management incentive fees when the return on assets under management exceeds specified benchmarks. Incentive fees are generally based on investment performance over a twelve-month period and are not subject to adjustment after the measurement period ends. Accordingly, we recognize incentive fees when the measurement period ends.
- 9 -
We also receive private equity incentive fees when the returns on certain private equity funds investments exceed specified threshold returns. Private equity incentive fees typically are based on investment results over a period greater than one year, and future investment underperformance could require amounts previously distributed to us to be returned to the funds. Accordingly, we recognize these incentive fees when all material contingencies have been substantially resolved.
We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. We recognize the current and deferred tax consequences of all transactions that have been recognized in the financial statements using the provisions of the enacted tax laws. Deferred tax assets are recognized for temporary differences that will result in deductible amounts in future years and for tax loss carry-forwards. We record a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that more likely than not will be realized. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for temporary differences that will result in taxable income in future years. Contingent liabilities related to income taxes are recorded when probable and reasonably estimable in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies.
We compute earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income applicable to common stock by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, which includes restricted stock units (RSUs) for which service has been provided. Diluted EPS includes the components of basic EPS and also includes the dilutive effects of RSUs for which service has not yet been provided and employee stock options.
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned, excluding real estate held for sale, and Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased are carried at fair value. Real estate held for sale is accounted for at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
Firm-owned securities pledged to counterparties who have the right, by contract or custom, to sell or repledge the securities are classified as Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and are disclosed as pledged as collateral.
We adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) effective December 1, 2006. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When observable prices are not available, we either use implied pricing from similar instruments or valuation models based on net present value of estimated future cash flows, adjusted as appropriate for liquidity, credit, market and/or other risk factors. Fair value measurements for applicable private equity positions reflect restrictions, if existing, expected cash flows, earnings multiples and/or comparison to similar market transactions.
Prior to December 1, 2006, we followed the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Audit and Accounting Guide,Brokers and Dealers in Securities (the Guide) when determining fair value for financial instruments, which permitted the recognition of a discount to the quoted price when determining the fair value for a substantial block of a particular security, when the quoted price was not considered to be readily realizable (i.e., a block discount).
For further discussion of our adoption of SFAS 157, see Accounting and Regulatory DevelopmentsSFAS 157 below.
- 10 -
We enter into derivative transactions both in a trading capacity and as an end-user. Acting in a trading capacity, we enter into derivative transactions to satisfy the needs of our clients and to manage our own exposure to market and credit risks resulting from our trading activities (collectively, Trading-Related Derivatives). For Trading-Related Derivatives, margins on futures contracts are included in receivables and payables from/to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations, as applicable.
As an end-user, we primarily use derivatives to hedge our exposure to market risk (including foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks) and credit risks (collectively, End-User Derivatives). When End-User Derivatives are interest rate swaps they are measured at fair value through earnings and the carrying value of the related hedged item is adjusted through earnings for the effect of changes in the risk being hedged. The hedge ineffectiveness in these relationships is recorded in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income. When End-User Derivatives are used in hedges of net investments in non-U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiaries, the gains or losses are reported within Accumulated other comprehensive income (net of tax) in Stockholders equity.
Prior to fiscal 2007, we followed Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 02-3,Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities (EITF 02-3). Under EITF 02-3, recognition of a trading profit at inception of a derivative transaction was prohibited unless the fair value of that derivative was obtained from a quoted market price supported by comparison to other observable inputs or based on a valuation technique incorporating observable inputs. Subsequent to the inception date (Day 1), we recognized trading profits deferred at Day 1 in the period in which the valuation of the instrument became observable. The adoption of SFAS 157 nullifies the guidance in EITF 02-3 that precluded the recognition of a trading profit at the inception of a derivative contract, unless the fair value of such derivative was obtained from a quoted market price or other valuation technique incorporating observable inputs. For further discussion of our adoption of SFAS 157, see Accounting and Regulatory DevelopmentsSFAS 157 below.
Securitization activities. In accordance with SFAS 140, we recognize transfers of financial assets as sales, if control has been surrendered. We determine control has been surrendered when the following three criteria have been met:
· The transferred assets have been isolated from the transferor put presumptively beyond the reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership (i.e., a true sale opinion has been obtained);
· Each transferee (or, if the transferee is a QSPE, each holder of its beneficial interests) has the right to pledge or exchange the assets (or beneficial interests) it received, and no condition both constrains the transferee (or holder) from taking advantage of its right to pledge or exchange and provides more than a trivial benefit to the transferor; and
· The transferor does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through either (i) an agreement that both entitles and obligates the transferor to repurchase or redeem them before their maturity or (ii) the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets.
When we act as the lender of securities in a securities-lending agreement and we receive securities that can be pledged or sold as collateral, we recognize in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition an asset, representing the securities received (Securities received as collateral) and a liability, representing the obligation to return those securities (Obligation to return securities received as collateral).
- 11 -
Repurchase and resale agreements.Securities purchased under agreements to resell and Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which are treated as collateralized agreements and financings for financial reporting purposes, are collateralized primarily by government and government agency securities and are carried net by counterparty, when permitted, at the amounts at which the securities subsequently will be resold or repurchased plus accrued interest. We take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. The fair value of the underlying positions is compared daily with the related receivable or payable balances, including accrued interest. We require counterparties to deposit additional collateral or return collateral pledged, as necessary, to ensure the fair value of the underlying collateral remains sufficient.
Securities borrowed and securities loaned. Securities borrowed and securities loaned are carried at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received plus accrued interest. We value the securities borrowed and loaned daily and obtain additional cash as necessary to ensure these transactions are adequately collateralized.
Other secured borrowings. Other secured borrowings principally reflect non-recourse financings and are recorded at contractual amounts plus accrued interest.
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements are recorded at historical cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is recognized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Buildings are depreciated up to a maximum of 40 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their useful lives or the terms of the underlying leases, which range up to 30 years. Equipment, furniture and fixtures are depreciated over periods of up to 10 years. Internal-use software that qualifies for capitalization under AICPA Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use, is capitalized and subsequently amortized over the estimated useful life of the software, generally three years, with a maximum of seven years. We review long-lived assets for impairment periodically and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts of the assets may be impaired. If the expected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized to the extent the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.
Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their expected useful lives, which range up to 15 years. Identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill are not amortized. Instead, these assets are evaluated at least annually for impairment. Goodwill is reduced upon the recognition of certain acquired net operating loss carryforward benefits.
Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments not held for resale with maturities of three months or less when we acquire them.
SFAS 159. In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159), which permits certain financial assets and financial liabilities to be measured at fair value, using an instrument-by-instrument election. The initial effect of adopting SFAS 159 must be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings for the fiscal year in which we apply SFAS 159. Retrospective application of SFAS 159 to fiscal years preceding the effective date is not permitted.
We elected to early adopt SFAS 159 beginning in our 2007 fiscal year and to measure at fair value substantially all structured notes not previously accounted for at fair value under SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments (SFAS 155), as well as certain deposits at our U.S. banking subsidiaries. We elected to adopt SFAS 159 for these instruments to reduce the complexity of accounting for these instruments under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. As a result of adopting SFAS 159, we recognized a $22 million after-tax increase ($35 million pre-tax) to opening retained earnings as of December 1, 2006, representing the effect of changing the measurement basis of these financial instruments from an adjusted amortized cost basis at November 30, 2006 to fair value.
- 12 -
SFAS 158. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Retirement Plans (SFAS 158) which requires an employer to recognize the over- or under-funded status of its defined benefit postretirement plans as an asset or liability in its Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition, measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation. For pension plans the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation; while for other postretirement plans the benefit obligation is the accumulated postretirement obligation. Upon adoption, SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognize previously unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs within Accumulated other comprehensive income (net of tax), a component of Stockholders equity.
SFAS 158 is effective for our fiscal year ending November 30, 2007. Had we adopted SFAS 158 at November 30, 2006, we would have recognized a pension asset of approximately $60 million for our funded pension plans and a liability of approximately $160 million for our unfunded pension and postretirement plans. Additionally, we would have reduced Accumulated other comprehensive income (net of tax) by approximately $380 million. At May 31, 2007 due to changes in interest rates and favorable asset returns, the reduction to Accumulated other comprehensive income (net of tax) would be approximately $200 million. The actual impact of adopting SFAS 158 will depend on the fair value of plan assets and the amount of the benefit obligation measured as of November 30, 2007.
SFAS 157. In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, outlines a fair value hierarchy based on inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value.
SFAS 157 also (i) nullifies the guidance in EITF 02-3 that precluded the recognition of a trading profit at the inception of a derivative contract, unless the fair value of such derivative was obtained from a quoted market price or other valuation technique incorporating observable inputs; (ii) clarifies that an issuers credit standing should be considered when measuring liabilities at fair value; (iii) precludes the use of a liquidity or block discount when measuring instruments traded in an active market at fair value; and (iv) requires costs related to acquiring financial instruments carried at fair value to be included in earnings as incurred.
We elected to early adopt SFAS 157 beginning in our 2007 fiscal year and we recorded the difference between the carrying amounts and fair values of (i) stand-alone derivatives and/or structured notes measured using the guidance in EITF 02-3 on recognition of a trading profit at the inception of a derivative, and (ii) financial instruments that are traded in active markets that were measured at fair value using block discounts, as a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings. As a result of adopting SFAS 157, we recognized a $45 million after-tax ($78 million pre-tax) increase to opening retained earnings.
The effect of adopting SFAS 157 was not material to our Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information regarding our adoption of SFAS 157, see Note 4, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
EITF Issue No. 04-5. In June 2005, the FASB ratified the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 04-5, Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights(EITF 04-5), which requires general partners (or managing members in the case of limited liability companies) to consolidate their partnerships or to provide limited partners with substantive rights to remove the general partner or to terminate the partnership. As the general partner of numerous private equity and asset management partnerships, we adopted EITF 04-5 effective June 30, 2005 for partnerships formed or modified after June 29, 2005. For partnerships formed on or before June 29, 2005 that had not been modified, we adopted EITF 04-5 as of the beginning of our 2007 fiscal year. The adoption of EITF 04-5 did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
FIN 48. In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, which clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position must meet to be recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. We must adopt FIN 48 as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal year. We are evaluating the effect of adopting FIN 48 on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
SOP 07-1. In June 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position (SOP) No. 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies(SOP 07-1). SOP 07-1 addresses when the accounting
- 13 -
principles of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companiesmust be applied by an entity and whether those accounting principles must be retained by a parent company in consolidation or by an investor in the application of the equity method of accounting. SOP 07-1 is effective for our fiscal year beginning December 1, 2008, with earlier application permitted as of December 1, 2007. We are evaluating the effect of adopting SOP 07-1 on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
FSP FIN 46(R)-7. In May 2007, the FASB directed the FASB Staff to issue FASB Staff Position No. FIN 46(R)-7, Application of FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to Investment Companies(FSP FIN 46(R)-7). FSP FIN 46(R)-7 makes permanent the temporary deferral of the application of the provisions of FIN 46(R) to unregistered investment companies, and extends the scope exception from applying FIN 46(R) to include registered investment companies. FSP FIN 46(R)-7 is effective upon adoption of SOP 07-1. We are evaluating the effect of adopting FSP FIN 46(R)-7 on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 2 Business Segments and Geographic Information
Business Segments
We organize our business operations into three business segments: Capital Markets, Investment Banking and Investment Management.
Our business segment information for the periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006 is prepared using the following methodologies and generally represents the information that is relied upon by management in its decision-making processes:
· Revenues and expenses directly associated with each business segment are included in determining income before taxes.
· Revenues and expenses not directly associated with specific business segments are allocated based on the most relevant measures applicable, including each segments revenues, headcount and other factors.
· Net revenues include allocations of interest revenue and interest expense to securities and other positions in relation to the cash generated by, or funding requirements of, the underlying positions.
· Business segment assets include an allocation of indirect corporate assets that have been fully allocated to our segments, generally based on each segments respective headcount figures.
Capital Markets. Our Capital Markets segment is divided into two components:
Fixed Income We make markets in and trade municipal and public sector instruments, interest rate and credit products, mortgage-related securities and loan products, currencies and commodities. We also originate mortgages and we structure and enter into a variety of derivative transactions. We provide research covering economic, quantitative, strategic, credit, relative value, index and portfolio analyses. Additionally, we provide financing, advice and servicing activities to the hedge fund community, known as prime brokerage services.
Equities- - We make markets in and trade equities and equity-related products and enter into a variety of derivative transactions. We also provide equity-related research coverage as well as execution and clearing activities for clients. Through our capital markets prime services, we provide pre- and post-trade financing advice and servicing to the hedge fund community. We provide financing, advice and servicing activities to the hedge fund community (prime brokerage) as well as provide execution and clearing activities for clients. We also engage in proprietary trading activities as well as principal investing in real estate and private equity.
- 14 -
Investment Banking. We take an integrated approach to client coverage, organizing bankers into industry, product and geographic groups within our Investment Banking segment. Business activities provided to corporations and governments worldwide can be separated into:
Global Finance We serve our clients capital raising needs through underwriting, private placements, leveraged finance and other activities associated with debt and equity products.
Advisory Services We provide business advisory assignments with respect to mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings, and other corporate activities.
Investment Management.The Investment Management business segment consists of:
Asset Management We provide customized investment management services for high net worth clients, mutual funds and other small and middle market institutional investors. Asset Management also serves as general partner for private equity and other alternative investment partnerships.
Private Investment Management We provide investment, wealth advisory and capital markets execution services to high net worth and middle market institutional clients.
Capital
Investment
Markets
Banking
Management
Total
Three months ended May 31, 2007
Gross revenues
13,616
813
10,022
45
3,594
768
Depreciation and amortization expense
109
12
147
Other expenses
2,132
800
554
3,486
Income before taxes
1,353
338
188
Segment assets (in billions)
595.5
1.3
9.1
605.9
Three months ended May 31, 2006
10,170
604
7,092
3,078
592
97
10
128
1,768
567
450
2,785
1,213
164
121
447.7
1.1
7.4
456.2
- 15 -
Six months ended May 31, 2007
25,838
1,536
18,742
73
7,096
1,463
211
51
4,163
1,450
1,084
6,697
2,722
528
Six months ended May 31, 2006
19,054
1,192
12,930
20
6,124
1,172
186
3,523
1,162
888
5,573
2,415
394
We organize our operations into three geographic regions:
· Europe, inclusive of our operations in the Middle East;
· Asia Pacific, inclusive of our operations in Australia and India; and
· Americas, inclusive of our operations in North, South and Central America.
Net revenues presented by geographic region are based upon the location of the senior coverage banker or investment advisor in the case of Investment Banking or Asset Management, respectively, or where the position was risk managed within Capital Markets and Private Investment Management. In addition, certain revenues associated with U.S. products and services that result from relationships with international clients have been classified as international revenues using an allocation consistent with our internal reporting.
The following presents, in managements judgment, a reasonable representation of each regions contribution to net revenues.
Three Months
Six Months
Ended May 31,
Percent
Change
Europe
$1,829
$1,088
68
%
$ 3,197
$2,209
Asia Pacific
762
469
62
1,356
1,052
29
Total NonAmericas
2,591
1,557
66
4,553
3,261
40
U.S.
2,888
2,808
5,916
5,542
Other Americas
33
(28
90
69
30
Total Americas
2,921
2,854
6,006
5,611
$5,512
$4,411
25
$10,559
$8,872
19
- 16 -
LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC.Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements(Unaudited)
Note 3 Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased were comprised of the following:
Sold But Not
Owned
Yet Purchased
Mortgages and mortgage-backed positions (1)
$ 79,634
$ 57,726
$ 119
$ 80
Government and agencies
44,705
47,293
79,622
70,453
Corporate debt and other
55,298
43,764
13,258
8,836
Corporate equities
58,552
43,087
50,976
28,464
Derivatives and other contractual agreements
28,335
22,696
24,001
18,017
Real estate held for sale
15,890
9,408
Commercial paper and other money market instruments
3,270
2,622
39
110
$285,684
$226,596
$168,015
$125,960
(1) Mortgages and mortgage-backed positions owned include approximately $14.7 billion and $5.5 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively, of mortgage loans for which the Company is not at risk. These loans, which have been sold to securitization trusts, do not meet the sale criteria under SFAS 140, and the investors in the trusts have no recourse to our other assets for failure of the borrowers to the underlying loans to pay when due.
Mortgages and mortgage-backed positions include mortgage loans (both residential and commercial) and non-agency mortgage-backed securities. We originate residential and commercial mortgage loans as part of our mortgage trading and securitization activities and engage in mortgage-backed securities trading. We originated approximately $32 billion and $31 billion of residential mortgage loans for the six months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In addition, we originated approximately $32 billion and $18 billion of commercial mortgage loans for the six months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Residential and commercial mortgage loans originated as well as those acquired in the secondary market are sold through securitization or syndication activities. For further discussion of our securitization activities, see Note 6, Securitizations and Special Purpose Entities to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our net investment position related to Real estate held for sale, after giving effect to non-recourse financing, was $12.5 billion and $5.9 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The following table presents the fair value of derivatives and other contractual agreements at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006. Assets included in the table represent unrealized gains, net of unrealized losses, for situations in which we have a master netting agreement. Similarly, liabilities represent net amounts owed to counterparties. The fair value of assets/liabilities related to derivative contracts at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006 represents our net receivable/payable for derivative financial instruments before consideration of securities collateral, but after consideration of cash collateral. Assets and liabilities are presented net of cash collateral of approximately $11.8 billion and $10.7 billion, respectively, at May 31, 2007 and $11.1 billion and $8.2 billion, respectively, at November 30, 2006.
- 17 -
Liabilities
Interest rate, currency and credit default swaps and options
$ 10,938
$ 8,251
$ 8,634
$ 5,691
Foreign exchange forward contracts and options
1,594
1,732
1,792
2,145
Other fixed income securities contracts (including TBAs and forwards) (1)
5,367
2,490
4,308
2,604
Equity contracts (including equity swaps, warrants and options)
10,436
11,528
7,962
7,577
$ 28,335
$ 24,001
$ 22,696
$ 18,017
(1) Includes commodity derivative assets of $477 million and liabilities of $490 million at May 31, 2007, and commodity derivative assets of $268 million and liabilities of $277 million at November 30, 2006.
At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, the fair value of derivative assets included $3.8 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively, related to exchange-traded option and warrant contracts. Similarly and for the same periods, the fair value of derivative liabilities included $3.6 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively, related to exchange-traded option and warrant contracts. With respect to OTC contracts, we view our net credit exposure to be $19.4 billion at May 31, 2007 and $15.6 billion at November 30, 2006, representing the fair value of OTC contracts in a net receivable position, after consideration of collateral. Counterparties to our OTC derivative products are primarily U.S. and foreign banks, securities firms, corporations, governments and their agencies, finance companies, insurance companies, investment companies and pension funds. Collateral held related to OTC contracts generally includes U.S. government and federal agency securities and listed equities.
A substantial portion of our securities transactions are collateralized and are executed with, and on behalf of, financial institutions, which includes other brokers and dealers, commercial banks and institutional clients. Our exposure to credit risk associated with the non-performance of these clients and counterparties in fulfilling their contractual obligations with respect to various types of transactions can be directly affected by volatile or illiquid trading markets, which may impair the ability of clients and counterparties to satisfy their obligations to us.
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned include U.S. government and agency securities, and securities issued by non-U.S. governments, which in the aggregate represented 7% and 9% of total assets at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively. In addition, collateral held for resale agreements represented approximately 22% and 23% of total assets at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively, and primarily consisted of securities issued by the U.S. government, federal agencies or non-U.S. governments. Our most significant industry concentration is financial institutions, which includes other brokers and dealers, commercial banks and institutional clients. This concentration arises in the normal course of business.
Note 4 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned, and Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased, are presented at fair value. In addition, certain long and short-term borrowing obligations, principally hybrid financial instruments and certain deposits at banks liabilities, are reflected at fair value.
Fair value is defined as the price at which an asset or liability could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, valuation models are applied. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the price transparency for the instruments or market and the instruments complexity. The valuation process to determine fair value also includes making appropriate adjustments to the valuation model outputs to consider risk factors.
Beginning December 1, 2006, assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition are categorized based upon the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair
- 18 -
value. Hierarchical levels defined by SFAS 157 and directly related to the amount of subjectivity associated with the inputs to fair valuation of these assets and liabilities are as follows:
Level I Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities at the measurement date.
The types of assets and liabilities carried at Level I fair value generally are G-7 government and agency securities, equities listed in active markets, investments in publicly traded mutual funds with quoted market prices and listed derivatives.
Level II Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability through correlation with market data at the measurement date and for the duration of the instruments anticipated life.
Fair valued assets and liabilities that are generally included in this category are non-G-7 government securities, municipal bonds, structured notes and certain mortgage and asset backed securities, certain corporate debt, certain private equity investments and certain derivatives.
Level III Inputs reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.
Generally, assets and liabilities carried at fair value and included in this category are certain mortgage and asset backed securities, certain corporate debt, certain private equity investments and certain derivatives.
An asset or a liabilitys categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of significant input to its valuation.
- 19 -
Fair valued Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned, and Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased and other liabilities at May 31, 2007 were:
At May 31, 2007
Level I
Level II
Level III
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned:
Mortgages and mortgage-backed positions
$ 24
$ 69,678
$ 9,932
41,001
3,704
47,008
5,505
43,931
10,499
4,122
Total non-derivative assets
$ 91,011
$130,889
$19,559
$241,459
Derivative assets(1)
3,801
22,076
2,458
Total Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned
$ 94,812
$152,965
$22,017
$269,794
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased:
$
74,176
5,446
3,858
9,400
50,686
290
Total non-derivative liabilities
$ 128,759
$ 15,255
$144,014
Derivative liabilities(1)
3,589
19,234
1,178
Total Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased:
$ 132,348
$ 34,489
$ 1,178
Other Liabilities Carried at Fair Value: (2)
Short-term borrowings
$ 5,823
$ 12,487
Long-term borrowings (3)
$ 20,979
(1) Derivative assets and liabilities are presented on a net basis by level. Inter- and intra-level cash collateral, cross-product and counterparty netting at May 31, 2007 was approximately $24 billion and $23 billion, respectively.
(2) In accordance with our adoption of SFAS 155, SFAS 157 and SFAS 159, we also recognize certain non-inventory positions at fair value. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further discussion of our adoption of these accounting standards.
(3) At May 31, 2007, the fair value of these borrowings was approximately $302 million less than the aggregate principal balance.
- 20 -
The following table summarizes the change in balance sheet carrying value associated with Level III assets and liabilities carried at fair value during the three and six months ended May 31, 2007:
Periodic
Balance
Payments,
Net
February 28,
Purchases,
Transfers
Gains/(Losses) (2), (3)
Sales, Net
In/(Out)
Realized
Unrealized
$ 9,095
$ 959
$ 96
$ 241
$(459
4,513
769
140
970
413
5
130
16,212
2,698
649
311
(311
19,559
2,144
63
(147
390
$18,356
$2,761
$657
$ 164
$ 79
1,010
(31
(194
324
Total Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased
$ 1,010
$ 69
$(31
$(194
$ 324
(1) Derivatives are presented on a net basis.
(2) Caution should be utilized when evaluating reported net revenues for Level III Financial instruments. These values are not presented net of hedging activities that may be transacted in instruments categorized within other hierarchy levels. Actual net revenues associated with Level III, inclusive of hedging activities, could differ materially.
(3) Net revenues (both realized and unrealized) for Level III financial instruments are generally classified in Principal transactions in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
$ 6,946
$2,908
$234
$429
$(585
3,625
1,592
106
42
2,355
1,186
135
12,926
5,686
787
(408
1,300
370
(45
825
$14,226
$6,056
$795
$523
$ 417
614
91
(102
$ 614
$ 91
$(102
$ 606
Note 5 Securities Received and Pledged as Collateral
We enter into secured borrowing and lending transactions to finance inventory positions, obtain securities for settlement and meet clients needs. We receive collateral in connection with resale agreements, securities borrowed transactions, borrow/pledge transactions, client margin loans and derivative transactions. We generally are permitted
- 21 -
to sell or repledge these securities held as collateral and use them to secure repurchase agreements, enter into securities lending transactions or deliver to counterparties to cover short positions.
At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, the fair value of securities received as collateral that we were permitted to sell or repledge was approximately $750 billion and $621 billion, respectively. The fair value of securities received as collateral that we sold or repledged was approximately $686 billion and $568 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
We also pledge our own assets, primarily to collateralize certain financing arrangements. These pledged securities, where the counterparty has the right by contract or custom to sell or repledge the financial instruments were approximately $68 billion and $43 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively. The carrying value of Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned that have been pledged or otherwise encumbered to counterparties where those counterparties do not have the right to sell or repledge, was approximately $87 billion and $75 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
Note 6 Securitizations and Special Purpose Entities
Generally, residential and commercial mortgages, home equity loans, municipal and corporate bonds, and lease and trade receivables are financial assets that we securitize through SPEs. We may continue to hold an interest in the financial assets securitized in the form of either the securities created in the transaction or residual interest in the SPEs (interests in securitizations) established to facilitate the securitization transaction. Interests in securitizations are presented within Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned (primarily mortgages and mortgage-backed) in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. For additional information regarding the accounting for securitization transactions, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting PoliciesConsolidation Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
For the periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, we securitized the following financial assets:
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
Residential mortgages
$37,683
$32,850
$60,264
$67,130
Commercial mortgages
5,083
3,412
7,912
5,112
Municipal and other asset-backed financial instruments
909
189
1,917
434
$43,675
$36,451
$70,093
$72,676
At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, we had approximately $1.8 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, of non-investment grade interests from our securitization activities (primarily junior security interests in residential mortgage securitizations).
The table below presents: the fair value of our interests in securitizations at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006; model assumptions of market factors; sensitivity of valuation models to adverse changes in the assumptions; as well as cash flows received on such interests in the securitizations.
- 22 -
Securitization Activity
May 31, 2007
November 30, 2006
Residential Mortgages
Non-
Dollars in millions
Grade
Interests in securitizations(in billions)(1)
1.7
0.6
5.3
2.0
$0.6
Weighted-average life (years)
Average constant prepayment rate
15.5
26.8
27.2
29.1
Effect of 10% adverse change
16
$
Effect of 20% adverse change
Weighted-average credit loss assumption
0.3
1.5
0.5
41
3.0
70
98
231
6.0
131
196
Weighted-average discount rate
7.3
17.1
6.4
7.2
18.4
5.8
268
79
24
124
76
$13
520
138
232
$22
Year ended November 30, 2006
Cash flows received on interests in securitizations
577
227
64
664
216
$59
(1) The amount of investment-grade interests in securitizations related to agency collateralized mortgage obligations was approximately $5.2 billion and $1.9 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
The above sensitivity analysis is hypothetical and should be used with caution since the stresses are performed without considering the effect of hedges, which serve to reduce our actual risk. We mitigate the risks associated with the above interests in securitizations through dynamic hedging strategies. These results are calculated by stressing a particular economic assumption independent of changes in any other assumption (as required by U.S. GAAP); in reality, changes in one factor often result in changes in another factor which may counteract or magnify the effect of the changes outlined in the above table. Changes in the fair value based on a 10% or 20% variation in an assumption should not be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear.
Mortgage servicing rights. Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) represent the right to future cash flows based upon contractual servicing fees for mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities. Our MSRs generally arise from the securitization of residential mortgage loans that we originate. MSRs are presented within Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, the Company had MSRs of approximately $911 million and $829 million, respectively.
- 23 -
Our MSRs activities for the six months ended May 31, 2007 and year ended November 30, 2006 are as follows:
Balance, beginning of period
$ 829
$ 561
Additions, net
507
Changes in fair value:
Paydowns/servicing fees
(87
(192
Resulting from changes in valuation assumptions
(80
Change due to SFAS 156 adoption
Balance, end of period
$ 911
The determination of MSRs fair value is based upon a discounted cash flow valuation model. Cash flow and prepayment assumptions used in our discounted cash flow model are: based on empirical data drawn from the historical performance of our MSRs; consistent with assumptions used by market participants valuing similar MSRs; and from data obtained on the performance of similar MSRs. These variables can, and generally will, vary from quarter to quarter as market conditions and projected interest rates change. For that reason, risk related to MSRs directly correlates to changes in prepayment speeds and discount rates. We mitigate this risk by entering into hedging transactions.
The following table shows the main assumptions used to determine the fair value of our MSRs at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, the sensitivity of our fair value measurements to changes in these assumptions, and cash flows received on contractual servicing:
Mortgage Servicing Rights
May 31,2007
November 30,2006
Weighted-average prepayment speed (CPR)
27.3
31.1
78
154
Discount rate
9.9
8.0
Cash flows received on contractual servicing
136
255
The above sensitivity analysis is hypothetical and should be used with caution since the stresses are performed without considering the effect of hedges, which serve to reduce our actual risk. These results are calculated by stressing a particular economic assumption independent of changes in any other assumption (as required by U.S. GAAP); in reality, changes in one factor often result in changes in another factor which may counteract or magnify the effect of the changes outlined in the above table. Changes in the fair value based on a 10% or 20% variation in an assumption should not be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear.
Non-QSPE activities. We have transactional activity with SPEs that do not meet the QSPE criteria because their permitted activities are not limited sufficiently or the assets are deemed non-qualifying financial instruments (e.g., real estate). Transactions with such SPEs include credit-linked notes, real estate investment vehicles and other structured financing transactions designed to meet clients investing or financing needs.
As a dealer in credit default swaps, we make a market in buying and selling credit protection on single issuers as well as on portfolios of credit exposures. We mitigate our credit risk, in part, by purchasing default protection through default swaps with SPEs. We pay a premium to the SPEs for assuming credit risk under the default swap. In these transactions, SPEs issue credit-linked notes to investors and use the proceeds to invest in high quality collateral. Our maximum potential loss associated with our involvement with such credit-linked note transactions is measured by the fair value of our credit default swaps with such SPEs. At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively, the fair values of these credit default swaps were $420 million and $155 million. The underlying
- 24 -
investment grade collateral held by SPEs was $12.5 billion and $10.8 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
Because the investors assume default risk associated with both the reference portfolio and the SPEs assets our expected loss calculations generally demonstrate the investors in the SPEs bear a majority of the entitys expected losses. Accordingly, we generally are not the primary beneficiary and therefore do not consolidate these SPEs.
In instances where we are the primary beneficiary of the credit default transaction generally from assumption of the fixed interest rate risk associated with the underlying collateral of an interest rate swap we consolidate the SPE. At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, we consolidated approximately $0.5 billion and $0.7 billion of these credit default transactions, respectively. The assets associated with these consolidated credit default transactions are presented as a component of Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned.
We also invest in real estate directly through controlled subsidiaries and through VIEs. We consolidate our investments in variable interest real estate entities when we are the primary beneficiary. We record the assets associated with these consolidated real estate-related investments in VIEs as a component of Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned. At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, we consolidated approximately $10.0 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively, of real estate-related investments in VIEs. After giving effect to non-recourse financing our net investment position in these consolidated VIEs was $8.4 billion and $2.2 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
The following table summarizes our non-QSPE activities at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006:
Credit default swaps with QSPEs
$ 420
$ 155
Value of underlying investment-grade collateral
12,545
10,754
Value of assets consolidated
488
718
Consolidated VIE real estate investments
9,957
3,380
Net investment
8,433
2,180
In addition to the above, we enter into other transactions with SPEs designed to meet clients investment and/or funding needs. For further discussion of our SPE-related and other commitments, see Note 8, Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 25 -
Note 7 Borrowings and Deposit Liabilities
Total borrowings and deposits at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, consisted of the following:
Current portion of long-term borrowings
$ 17,144
12,878
Commercial paper
1,453
1,653
9,115
6,107
20,638
Amount carried at fair value(1)
3,783
Deposit liabilities at banks
Time deposits
At U.S. banks
$ 12,381
14,592
At non-U.S. banks
7,586
5,621
Savings deposits
1,549
1,199
181
$ 21,697
Long-term borrowings
Senior notes
$ 91,433
75,202
Subordinated notes
4,865
3,238
Junior subordinated notes
4,521
2,738
$100,819
11,025
(1) Borrowings and deposits carried at fair value in accordance with SFAS 155 and SFAS 159. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Polices, for additional information.
Junior subordinated notes are notes issued to trusts or limited partnerships (collectively, the Trusts) which generally qualify as equity capital by leading rating agencies (subject to limitation). The Trusts were formed for the purposes of (a) issuing securities representing ownership interests in the assets of the Trusts; (b) investing the proceeds of the Trusts in junior subordinated notes of Holdings; and (c) engaging in activities necessary and incidental thereto.
In May 2007, Holdings and Lehman Brothers Holdings Capital Trust VII (Trust VII) issued $1.0 billion 5.857% Mandatory Capital Advantaged Preferred Securities (Fixed Rate MCAPSSM) and Holdings and Lehman Brothers Holdings Capital Trust VIII (Trust VIII) issued $0.5 billion Floating Rate Mandatory Capital Advantaged Trust Preferred Securities (Floating Rate MCAPSSM and together with the Fixed Rate MCAPSsm, the MCAPSSM). Corresponding $1.0 billion and $0.5 billion principal amounts of junior subordinated notes were issued by Holdings to Trust VII and Trust VIII, respectively. MCAPSSM consist of both a stock purchase contract to acquire perpetual, non-cumulative preferred stock in Holdings, and trust preferred securities of Trust VII or Trust VIII, as applicable, which are pledged to secure the investors obligations under the stock purchase contract. Distributions will accrue on the Fixed Rate MCAPSSMat a fixed rate of 5.857% per annum and on the Floating Rate MCAPSsm at a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 0.83% . The trust preferred securities are re-marketable five years from the date of issuance, if not earlier, upon an early re-marketing event. The proceeds of the remarketing satisfy the stock purchase contract and will give the original investor perpetual, non-cumulative preferred stock in Holdings. The perpetual preferred stock is callable by Holdings after the later of their issue date and May 31, 2012. We did not consolidate Trust VII or Trust VIII under the application of FIN 46(R).
With a settlement date in June 2007 and issued in May 2007, Lehman Brothers UK Capital Funding V LP, a UK limited partnership (the UK LP), issued in aggregate $500 million Fixed Rate Enhanced Capital Advantage Preferred Securities (ECAPS®). A corresponding $500 million principal amount of junior subordinated notes were issued by Holdings to the UK LP. Distributions will accrue on the ECAPS® at a rate of 6.9% per annum. ECAPS® have no mandatory redemption date, but may be redeemed at our option on June 1, 2012, or annually thereafter. We did not consolidate the UK LP under the application of FIN 46(R).
- 26 -
Credit Facilities
We use both committed and uncommitted bilateral and syndicated long-term bank facilities to complement our long-term debt issuance. Holdings maintains a $2.0 billion unsecured, committed revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks which expires in February 2009. In addition, we maintain a $2.5 billion multi-currency unsecured, committed revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks for Lehman Brothers Bankhaus AG (Bankhaus) which expires in April 2010. Our ability to borrow under such facilities is conditioned on complying with customary lending conditions and covenants. We have maintained compliance with the material covenants under these credit agreements at all times. As of May 31, 2007, there were no borrowings against Holdings or Bankhaus credit facilities, although under both facilities we borrowed and re-paid those borrowings during the three month period.
Note 8 Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
In the normal course of business, we enter into various commitments and guarantees, including lending commitments to high grade and high yield borrowers, private equity investment commitments, liquidity commitments and other guarantees.
The following table summarizes lending-related commitments at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006:
Expiration per Period at May 31, 2007
Total ContractualAmount
2009-
2011-
2013-
May
November
2008
2010
2012
Later
31, 2007
30, 2006
Lending commitments
High grade (1)
$ 1,623
$ 1,965
$ 4,974
$ 10,933
$ 146
$ 19,641
$ 17,945
High yield (2)
2,139
1,333
1,160
3,549
2,485
10,666
7,558
Contingent acquisition facilities
Investment grade
5,036
1,950
6,986
1,918
Non-investment grade
27,014
16,872
43,886
12,766
Mortgage commitments
12,573
329
1,644
408
423
15,377
12,246
Secured lending transactions
96,230
3,582
615
1,555
102,448
82,987
(1) We view our net credit exposure for high grade commitments, after consideration of hedges, to be $6.6 billion and $4.9 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
(2) We view our net credit exposure for high yield commitments, after consideration of hedges, to be $9.4 billion and $5.9 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
We use various hedging and funding strategies to actively manage our market, credit and liquidity exposures on these commitments. We do not believe total commitments necessarily are indicative of actual risk or funding requirements because the commitments may not be drawn or fully used and such amounts are reported before consideration of hedges.
High grade and high yield. Through our high grade (investment grade) and high yield (non-investment grade) sales, trading and underwriting activities, we make commitments to extend credit in loan syndication transactions. These commitments and any related drawdowns of these facilities typically have fixed maturity dates and are contingent on certain representations, warranties and contractual conditions applicable to the borrower. We define high yield exposures as securities of or loans to companies rated BB+ or lower or equivalent ratings by recognized credit rating agencies, as well as non-rated securities or loans that, in managements opinion, are non-investment grade.
We had commitments to investment grade borrowers at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006 of $19.6 billion (net credit exposure of $6.6 billion, after consideration of hedges) and $17.9 billion (net credit exposure of $4.9 billion,
- 27 -
after consideration of hedges), respectively. We had commitments to non-investment grade borrowers of $10.7 billion (net credit exposure of $9.4 billion, after consideration of hedges) and $7.6 billion (net credit exposure of $5.9 billion, after consideration of hedges) at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
Contingent acquisition facilities. We provide contingent commitments to investment and non-investment grade counterparties related to acquisition financing. We do not believe contingent acquisition commitments are necessarily indicative of actual risk or funding requirements as funding is dependent both upon a proposed transaction being completed and the acquiror fully utilizing our commitment. Typically, these commitments are made to a potential acquiror in a proposed acquisition, which may or may not be completed depending on whether the potential acquiror to whom we have provided our commitment is successful. In addition, acquirors generally utilize multiple financing sources, including other investment and commercial banks, as well as accessing the general capital markets for completing transactions. Further, our past practice, consistent with our credit facilitation framework, has been to substantially distribute acquisition financings through loan syndications to investors prior to the acquisition funding. Therefore, our contingent acquisition commitments are generally significantly greater than the amounts we will ultimately fund. Additionally, the contingent borrowers ability to draw on the commitment is typically subject to there being no material adverse change in the borrowers financial conditions, among other factors. Commitments also generally contain certain flexible pricing features to adjust for changing market conditions prior to closing.
We provided contingent commitments to investment grade counterparties related to acquisition financing of approximately $7.0 billion and $1.9 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively. In addition, we provided contingent commitments to non-investment grade counterparties related to acquisition financing of approximately $43.9 billion and $12.8 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
Mortgage commitments. Through our mortgage origination platforms we make commitments to extend mortgage loans. At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, we had outstanding mortgage commitments of approximately $15.4 billion and $12.2 billion, respectively, including $9.6 billion and $7.0 billion of residential mortgages and $5.8 billion and $5.2 billion of commercial mortgages. The residential mortgage loan commitments require us to originate mortgage loans at the option of a borrower generally within 90 days at fixed interest rates. We sell residential mortgage loans, once originated, primarily through securitizations.
Secured lending transactions. In connection with our financing activities, we had outstanding commitments under certain collateralized lending arrangements of approximately $6.2 billion and $7.4 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively. These commitments require borrowers to provide acceptable collateral, as defined in the agreements, when amounts are drawn under the lending facilities. Advances made under these lending arrangements typically are at variable interest rates and generally provide for over-collateralization. In addition, at May 31, 2007, we had commitments to enter into forward starting secured resale and repurchase agreements, primarily secured by government and government agency collateral, of $54.7 billion and $41.5 billion, respectively, compared to $44.4 billion and $31.2 billion, respectively, at November 30, 2006.
- 28 -
The following table summarizes other commitments and guarantees at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006:
Notional/
Maximum amount
2013 and
Derivative contracts
$68,234
$75,614
$157,219
$140,385
$244,363
$685,815
$534,585
Municipal-securities-
related commitments
671
700
617
133
2,564
4,685
1,599
Other commitments with
variable interest entities
662
1,596
2,984
301
2,997
8,540
4,902
Standby letters of credit
1,795
219
2,014
2,380
Private equity and other
principal investment
commitments
2,077
2,440
589
273
5,379
1,088
Derivative contracts. Under FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45), derivative contracts are considered to be guarantees if such contracts require us to make payments to counterparties based on changes in an underlying instrument or index (e.g., security prices, interest rates, and currency rates) and include written credit default swaps, written put options, written foreign exchange and interest rate options. Derivative contracts are not considered guarantees if these contracts are cash settled and we cannot determine if the derivative counterparty held the contracts underlying instruments at inception. We have determined these conditions have been met for certain large financial institutions. Accordingly, when these conditions are met, we have not included these derivatives in our guarantee disclosures.
At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, the maximum payout value of derivative contracts deemed to meet the FIN 45 definition of a guarantee was approximately $686 billion and $535 billion, respectively. For purposes of determining maximum payout, notional values are used; however, we believe the fair value of these contracts is a more relevant measure of these obligations because we believe the notional amounts greatly overstate our expected payout. At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, the fair value of such derivative contracts approximated $7.3 billion and $9.3 billion, respectively. In addition, all amounts included above are before consideration of hedging transactions. We substantially mitigate our risk on these contracts through hedges, using other derivative contracts and/or cash instruments. We manage risk associated with derivative guarantees consistent with our global risk management policies.
Municipal-securities-related commitments. At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, we had municipal-securities-related commitments of approximately $4.7 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively, which are principally comprised of liquidity commitments related to trust certificates backed by investment grade municipal securities. We believe our liquidity commitments to these trusts involve a low level of risk because our obligations are supported by investment grade securities and generally cease if the underlying assets are downgraded below investment grade or default. In certain instances, we also provide credit default protection to investors, which approximated $74 million and $48 million at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
Other commitments with VIEs. We make certain liquidity commitments and guarantees associated with VIEs. We provided liquidity commitments of approximately $2.2 billion and $1.0 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively, which represented our maximum exposure to loss, to commercial paper conduits in support of certain clients secured financing transactions. However, we believe our actual risk to be limited because these liquidity commitments are supported by over-collateralization with investment grade collateral.
In addition, we provide limited downside protection guarantees to investors in certain VIEs by guaranteeing return of their initial principal investment. Our maximum exposure to loss under such commitments was approximately $3.8 billion and $3.9 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively. We believe our actual risk to be
- 29 -
limited because our obligations are collateralized by the VIEs assets and contain significant constraints under which downside protection will be available (e.g., the VIE is required to liquidate assets in the event certain loss levels are triggered).
Holdings is also committed to provide $2.5 billion of back-up liquidity to a VIE, which exists to provide funding for our contingent acquisition commitments, if necessary. Holdings commitment to provide financing is contingent upon the VIE being unable to remarket certain secured liquidity notes upon their maturity. Such financing from Holdings to the VIE is due, generally, one year after a failed remarketing event, if any.
Standby letters of credit. At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively, we were contingently liable for $2.0 billion and $2.4 billion of letters of credit primarily used to provide collateral for securities and commodities borrowed and to satisfy margin deposits at option and commodity exchanges.
Private equity and other principal investments.At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, we had private equity and other principal investment commitments of approximately $5.4 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, comprising commitments to Lehman private equity partnerships and other principal investment opportunities that we intend to distribute and syndicate, in part, to investing clients.
Other. In the normal course of business, we provide guarantees to securities clearinghouses and exchanges. These guarantees generally are required under the standard membership agreements, such that members are required to guarantee the performance of other members. To mitigate these performance risks, the exchanges and clearinghouses often require members to post collateral.
In connection with certain asset sales and securitization transactions, we often make customary representations and warranties about the assets. Violations of these representations and warranties, such as early payment defaults by borrowers, may require us to repurchase loans previously sold, or indemnify the purchaser against any losses. To mitigate these risks, to the extent the assets being securitized may have been originated by third parties, we generally obtain equivalent representations and warranties from these third parties when we acquire the assets. We have established reserves which we believe to be adequate in connection with such representations and warranties.
In the normal course of business, we are exposed to credit and market risk as a result of executing, financing and settling various client security and commodity transactions. These risks arise from the potential that clients or counterparties may fail to satisfy their obligations and the collateral obtained is insufficient. In such instances, we may be required to purchase or sell financial instruments at unfavorable market prices. We seek to control these risks by obtaining margin balances and other collateral in accordance with regulatory and internal guidelines.
Certain of our subsidiaries, as general partners, are contingently liable for the obligations of certain public and private limited partnerships. In our opinion, contingent liabilities, if any, for the obligations of such partnerships will not, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition or Consolidated Statement of Income.
In connection with certain acquisitions and strategic investments, we agreed to pay additional consideration contingent on the acquired entity meeting or exceeding specified income, revenue or other performance thresholds. These payments will be recorded as amounts become determinable. Had the determination dates been May 31, 2007 and November, 30, 2006, our estimated obligations related to these contingent consideration arrangements are $487 million and $224 million, respectively.
We are continuously under audit examination by the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) and other tax authorities in jurisdictions in which we conduct significant business activities, such as the United Kingdom, Japan and various U.S. states and localities. We regularly assess the likelihood of additional tax assessments in each of these tax jurisdictions and the related impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. We have established tax reserves, which we believe to be adequate, in relation to the potential for additional tax assessments. Once established, tax reserves are adjusted only when additional information is obtained or an event occurs requiring a change to such tax reserves.
During 2006, the IRS completed its 1997 through 2000 federal income tax examination, which resulted in unresolved issues asserted by the IRS that challenge certain of our tax positions (the proposed adjustments). We believe our positions comply with the applicable tax law and intend to vigorously dispute the proposed adjustments
- 30 -
through judicial procedures, as appropriate. We believe that we have adequate tax reserves in relation to these unresolved issues. However, it is possible that amounts greater than our reserves could be incurred, which we estimate would not exceed $100 million.
In the normal course of business we have been named as a defendant in a number of lawsuits and other legal and regulatory proceedings. Such proceedings include actions brought against us and others with respect to transactions in which we acted as an underwriter or financial advisor, actions arising out of our activities as a broker or dealer in securities and commodities and actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants against many securities firms, including us. We provide for potential losses that may arise out of legal and regulatory proceedings to the extent such losses are probable and can be estimated. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome, we generally have denied, or believe we have a meritorious defense and will deny, liability in all significant cases pending against us, and we intend to defend vigorously each such case. Based on information currently available, we believe the amount, or range, of reasonably possible losses in excess of established reserves not to be material to the Companys consolidated financial condition or cash flows. However, losses may be material to our operating results for any particular future period, depending on the level of income for such period.
Note 9 Earnings per Common Share and Stockholders Equity
Earnings per common share were calculated as follows:
Numerator:
Preferred stock dividends
(17
(16
(34
Numerator for basic earnings per sharenet income
applicable to common stock
Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per shareweighted-average
common shares
538.2
545.1
539.7
545.7
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee stock options
25.1
30.1
25.9
30.2
Restricted stock units
4.8
7.6
6.2
Dilutive potential common shares
29.9
37.7
32.1
37.8
Denominator for diluted earnings per shareweighted-
average common and dilutive potential common shares (1)
568.1
582.8
571.8
583.5
Earnings per Basic Share
Earnings per basic share
Earnings per Diluted Share
Earnings per diluted share
1) Anti-dilutive options and restricted stock units excluded from the calculations of diluted earnings per share
4.0
2.7
2.4
4.5
On April 5, 2006, our Board of Directors approved a 2-for-1 common stock split, in the form of a stock dividend that was effected on April 28, 2006. The par value of the common stock remained at $0.10 per share. Accordingly,
- 31 -
an adjustment from Additional paid-in capital to Common stock was required to preserve the par value of the post-split shares.
Note 10 Share-Based Employee Incentive Plans
We sponsor several share-based employee incentive plans. Amortization of compensation costs for grants awarded under these plans was approximately $346 million and $251 million for the three months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively and approximately $633 million and $500 million for the six months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for these plans was $147 million and $103 million for the three months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $259 million and $207 million for the six months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
At May 31, 2007, unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock option and restricted stock unit (RSU) awards totaled $2.5 billion. The cost of these non-vested awards is expected to be recognized over an average period of 3.9 years.
Below is a description of our share-based employee incentive plans.
We sponsor several share-based employee incentive plans. The total number of shares of common stock remaining available for future awards under these plans at May 31, 2007, was 83.1 million (not including shares that may be returned to the Stock Incentive Plan (the SIP) as described below, but including an additional 0.4 million shares authorized for issuance under the Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. 1994 Management Ownership Plan (the 1994 Plan) that have been reserved solely for issuance in respect of dividends on outstanding awards under this plan). In connection with awards made under our share-based employee incentive plans, we are authorized to issue shares of common stock held in treasury or newly-issued shares.
Eligible employees receive RSUs, in lieu of cash, as a portion of their total compensation. There is no further cost to employees associated with RSU awards. RSU awards generally vest over two to five years and convert to unrestricted freely transferable common stock five years from the grant date. All or a portion of an award may be
- 32 -
canceled if employment is terminated before the end of the relevant vesting period. We accrue dividend equivalents on outstanding RSUs (in the form of additional RSUs), based on dividends declared on our common stock.
For RSUs granted prior to 2004, we measured compensation cost based on the market value of our common stock at the grant date in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and, accordingly, a discount from the market price of an unrestricted share of common stock on the RSU grant date was not recognized for selling restrictions subsequent to the vesting date. For awards granted beginning in 2004, we measure compensation cost based on the market price of our common stock at the grant date less a discount for sale restrictions subsequent to the vesting date in accordance with SFAS No. 123 Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123) and SFAS No.123 (revised) Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)). The fair value of RSUs subject to post-vesting date sale restrictions are generally discounted by three to eight percent for each year based upon the duration of the post-vesting restriction. These discounts are based on market-based studies and academic research on securities with restrictive features. RSUs granted in each of the periods presented contain selling restrictions subsequent to the vesting date.
The fair value of RSUs converted to common stock without restrictions for the six months ended May 31, 2007 was $282 million. Compensation costs previously recognized and tax benefits recognized in equity upon issuance of these awards were approximately $211 million.
The following table summarizes RSU activity for the six months ended May 31, 2007:
Weighted
Average
Total Number
Grant Date
Unamortized
Amortized
of RSUs
Fair Value
Balance, November 30, 2006
34,904,500
65,543,498
100,447,998
$43.37
Granted
36,172,885
69.25
Canceled
(2,220,402
290,997
(1,929,405
51.72
Exchanged for stock without
restrictions
(3,729,959
(3,729,959)
42.45
Amortization
(23,107,513
23,107,513
Outstanding May 31, 2007
45,749,470
85,212,049
130,961,519
$50.42
Of the RSUs outstanding at May 31, 2007, approximately 85.2 million were amortized and included in basic earnings per share. Approximately 11.0 million will be amortized during the remainder of fiscal 2007 and the remainder will be amortized subsequent to November 30, 2007. RSUs outstanding, net of shares held in an irrevocable grantor trust (the RSU Trust) were 54.7 million and 35.7 million at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively. The RSU Trust provides common stock voting rights to employees who hold outstanding RSUs. During fiscal 2007, 15.0 million shares have been issued out of treasury stock into the RSU Trust.
Stock Options
Employees and Directors may receive stock options, in lieu of cash, as a portion of their total compensation. Such options generally become exercisable over a one- to five-year period and generally expire 5 to 10 years from the date of grant, subject to accelerated expiration upon termination of employment.
During the six months ended May 31, 2007, 10,200 stock options were granted. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to measure the grant date fair value of stock options granted to employees. Stock options granted have exercise prices equal to the market price of our common stock on the grant date. The principal assumptions utilized in valuing options and our methodology for estimating such model inputs include: (i) risk-free interest rate - estimate is based on the yield of U.S. zero coupon securities with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option; (ii) expected volatility - estimate is based on the historical volatility of our common stock for the three years preceding the award date, the implied volatility of market-traded options on our common stock on the grant date and other factors; and (iii) expected option life - estimate is based on internal studies of historical and projected exercise behavior based on different employee groups and specific option characteristics, including the effect of employee terminations.
- 33 -
Based on the results of the model, the weighted-average fair value of stock options granted during the six months ended May 31, 2007 was $24.94. The weighted-average assumptions used during the six months ended May 31, 2007 were as follows:
Weighted-Average Black-Scholes Assumptions
Risk-free interest rate
4.72%
Expected volatility
25.12%
Dividends per share
$ 0.15
Expected life
7.0 years
The valuation technique takes into account the specific terms and conditions of the stock options granted including vesting period, termination provisions, intrinsic value and time dependent exercise behavior.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for the six months ended May 31, 2007:
Stock Option Activity
Weighted-Average
Expiration
Options
Exercise Price
Dates
81,396,371
$33.32
12/065/16
10,200
72.07
Exercised
(9,117,999
29.61
(170,094
23.23
Balance, May 31, 2007
72,118,478
$33.82
6/074/17
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the six months ended May 31, 2007 was $455 million for which compensation costs previously recognized and tax benefits recognized in equity upon issuance totaled approximately $178 million. Cash received from the exercise of stock options for the six months ended May 31, 2007 totaled $268 million.
The table below provides additional information related to stock options outstanding:
Dollars in millions, except per share data
Outstanding
Options Exercisable
Number of options
46,644,850
Weighted-average exercise price
$30.34
Aggregate intrinsic value
$2,853
$2,007
Weighted-average remaining contractual terms in years
4.39
3.79
At May 31, 2007, the number of options outstanding, net of projected forfeitures, was approximately 70.9 million shares, with a weighted-average exercise price of $33.65, aggregate intrinsic value of $2.8 billion, and weighted-average remaining contractual terms of 4.36 years.
At May 31, 2007, there were approximately 443,308 shares of restricted stock outstanding. The fair value of the 224,538 shares of restricted stock that became freely tradable during the six months ended May 31, 2007 was approximately $17 million.
We maintain a common stock repurchase program to manage our equity capital. Our stock repurchase program is effected through regular open-market purchases, as well as through employee transactions where employees tender shares of common stock to pay for the exercise price of stock options and the required tax withholding obligations upon option exercises and conversion of restricted stock units to freely-tradable common stock. For 2007, our Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase, subject to market conditions, of up to 100 million shares of Holdings common stock for the management of our equity capital, including offsetting dilution due to employee stock awards. During the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, we repurchased approximately 6.5 million and 26.0 million shares, respectively, of our common stock through open-market purchases at an aggregate cost of $477 million and
- 34 -
$2.0 billion, respectively, or $73.87 per share and $78.53 per share, respectively. In addition, and for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007, we withheld approximately 0.7 million and 2.2 million shares, respectively, of common stock from employees at an equivalent cost of $55 million and $172 million, respectively. As of May 31, 2007, approximately 71.8 million shares remained available for repurchase under this authorization. See Part II, Item 2, Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds, for more information.
Note 11 Employee Benefit Plans
We provide both funded and unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plans for the majority of our employees worldwide. In addition, we provide certain other postretirement benefits, primarily health care and life insurance, to eligible employees. The following table presents the components of net periodic cost related to these plans for the three and six months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006:
Pension Benefits
Other Postretirement
NonU.S.
Benefits
Three Months Ended May 31,
Service cost
$ 14
$ 10
$ 2
Interest cost
15
1
Expected return on plan assets
(21
(19
(9
(7
Amortization of net
actuarial loss
Amortization of prior service
cost
Net periodic cost
$ 17
$ 1
$ 3
$ 28
$ 21
$ 4
13
(43
(38
(13
$ 34
$ 29
$ 6
Expected Contributions for the Fiscal Year Ending November 30, 2007
We do not expect it to be necessary to contribute to our U.S. pension plans in the fiscal year ending November 30, 2007. We expect to contribute approximately $24 million to our non-U.S. pension plans in the fiscal year ending November 30, 2007.
- 35 -
Note 12 Regulatory Requirements
Holdings is regulated by the SEC as a consolidated supervised entity (CSE). As such, it is subject to group-wide supervision and examination by the SEC, and must comply with rules regarding the measurement, management and reporting of market, credit, liquidity, legal and operational risk. As of May 31, 2007, Holdings was in compliance with the CSE capital requirements and held allowable capital in excess of the minimum capital requirements on a consolidated basis.
In the United States, LBI and Neuberger Berman, LLC (NBLLC) are registered broker dealers that are subject to SEC Rule 15c3-1 and Rule 1.17 of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which specify minimum net capital requirements for their registrants. LBI and NBLLC have consistently operated in excess of their respective regulatory capital requirements. The SEC has approved LBIs use of Appendix E of the Net Capital Rule which establishes alternative net capital requirements for broker-dealers that are part of CSEs. Appendix E allows LBI to calculate net capital charges for market risk and derivatives-related credit risk based on internal risk models provided that LBI holds tentative net capital in excess of $1 billion and net capital in excess of $500 million. Additionally, LBI is required to notify the SEC in the event that its tentative net capital is less than $5 billion. As of May 31, 2007, LBI had tentative net capital in excess of $6.6 billion, and had net capital of $4.1 billion, which exceeded the minimum net capital requirement by $3.6 billion. As of May 31, 2007, NBLLC had net capital of $256 million, which exceeded the minimum net capital requirement by $251 million.
LBIE, a United Kingdom registered broker-dealer and subsidiary of Holdings, is subject to the capital requirements of the Financial Services Authority (FSA) of the United Kingdom. Financial resources, as defined, must exceed the total financial resources requirement of the FSA. At May 31, 2007, LBIEs financial resources of approximately $12.5 billion exceeded the minimum requirement by approximately $2.3 billion. LBJ, a regulated broker-dealer, is subject to the capital requirements of the Financial Services Agency and, at May 31, 2007, had net capital of approximately $992 million, which was approximately $432 million in excess of the specified levels required.
Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB (LBB), our thrift subsidiary, is regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). Lehman Brothers Commercial Bank (LBCB), our Utah industrial bank subsidiary is regulated by the Utah Department of Financial Institutions and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. LBB and LBCB exceed all regulatory capital requirements and are considered to be well capitalized as of May 31, 2007. Bankhaus is subject to the capital requirements of the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority of the German Federal Republic. At May 31, 2007, Bankhaus financial resources, as defined, exceed its minimum financial resources requirement.
Certain other subsidiaries are subject to various securities, commodities and banking regulations and capital adequacy requirements promulgated by the regulatory and exchange authorities of the countries in which they operate. At May 31, 2007, these other subsidiaries were in compliance with their applicable local capital adequacy requirements.
In addition, our AAA rated derivatives subsidiaries, Lehman Brothers Financial Products Inc. (LBFP) and Lehman Brothers Derivative Products Inc. (LBDP), have established certain capital and operating restrictions that are reviewed by various rating agencies. At May 31, 2007, LBFP and LBDP each had capital that exceeded the requirements of the rating agencies.
The regulatory rules referred to above, and certain covenants contained in various debt agreements, may restrict Holdings ability to withdraw capital from its regulated subsidiaries, which in turn could limit its ability to pay dividends to shareholders. Holdings provides guarantees of certain activities of its subsidiaries, including our fixed income derivative business conducted through Lehman Brothers Special Financing, Inc.
- 36 -
Note 13 Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
LBI, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holdings, had approximately $0.8 billion of debt securities outstanding at May 31, 2007 that were issued in registered public offerings and were therefore subject to the reporting requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Holdings has fully and unconditionally guaranteed these outstanding debt securities of LBI (and any debt securities of LBI that may be issued in the future under these registration statements), which, together with the information presented in this Note 13, Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements, allows LBI to avail itself of an exemption provided by SEC rules from the requirement to file separate LBI reports under the Exchange Act. For further discussion on the regulatory requirements of our subsidiaries, see Note 13, Regulatory Requirements, to the 2006 Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Form 10-K for a discussion of restrictions on the ability of Holdings to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
The following schedules set forth our condensed consolidating statements of income for the three and sixth months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, our condensed consolidating balance sheets at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, and our condensed consolidating statements of cash flows for the six months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006. In the following schedules, Holdings refers to the unconsolidated balances of Holdings, LBI refers to the unconsolidated balances of Lehman Brothers Inc. and Other Subsidiaries refers to the combined balances of all other subsidiaries of Holdings. Eliminations represents the adjustments necessary to eliminate intercompany transactions and our investments in subsidiaries.
- 37 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income
Holdings
LBI
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
$ (604
$1,350
$4,766
$ 5,512
Equity in net income of subsidiaries
1,856
379
(2,235
213
951
2,469
Income (loss) before taxes
1,039
778
2,297
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
(234
688
Net income (loss)
$ 1,273
$ 626
$1,609
$(2,235
$ (434
$1,966
$2,879
$ 4,411
1,363
53
(1,416
1,219
1,454
689
1,425
(313
293
516
$ 1,002
$ 507
$ 909
$(1,416
$(1,061
$2,633
$8,987
3,211
759
(3,970
172
1,875
4,934
1,978
1,517
4,053
(441
262
1,338
$1,255
$2,715
$(3,970
$ (470
$3,554
$5,788
$ 8,872
246
(2,731
2,267
3,143
1,602
1,533
2,645
(460
499
2,062
1,034
1,675
$1,056
$1,675
$(2,731
- 38 -
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet at May 31, 2007
$ 1,052
$ 485
$ 5,730
$ (1,974
3,339
3,803
Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and Securities received as collateral
33,018
81,788
228,930
(49,735
294,001
Collateralized agreements
163,107
85,964
249,071
Receivables and other assets
5,776
12,277
41,996
(9,707
50,342
Due from subsidiaries
123,312
92,586
617,492
(833,390
Equity in net assets of subsidiaries
21,946
1,277
67,361
(90,584
$185,116
$354,859
$1,051,276
$(985,390
Liabilities and stockholders equity
Short-term borrowings and the current portion of long-term borrowings
$ 15,967
$ 704
$ 11,244
$ (203
Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased and Obligation to return securities received as collateral
541
66,618
161,551
(52,378
176,332
Collateralized financing
13,132
88,045
88,210
3,142
192,529
861
20,918
54,571
(10,707
65,643
Due to subsidiaries
62,101
169,056
544,605
(775,762
22,340
(643
71,385
5,213
82,476
(58,255
163,987
350,554
964,997
(894,806
4,305
86,279
- 39 -
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet at November 30, 2006
$ 3,435
$ 534
$ 4,369
$ (2,351
$ 5,987
3,256
2,784
17,866
75,025
178,798
(38,994
232,695
148,148
70,909
219,057
4,945
12,998
27,911
(6,139
39,715
95,640
66,074
434,208
(595,922
19,333
1,267
43,532
(64,132
$141,270
$307,302
$762,511
$(707,538
$ 10,721
$ 538
$ 9,412
$ (33
92
59,533
109,869
(37,435
132,059
6,136
88,372
75,950
170,458
2,286
18,893
44,599
(7,169
58,609
45,389
130,145
376,137
(551,671
23,786
(2,374
57,455
5,821
62,626
(44,724
122,079
303,302
702,379
(643,406
4,000
60,132
- 40 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Six months Ended May 31, 2007
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
$ 1,255
$ 2,715
$ (3,970
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Equity in income of subsidiaries
(3,211
(759
3,970
96
170
(44
(3
Cash segregated and on deposit for regulatory and other purposes
(83
(1,019
(15,115
(7,797
(44,703
10,692
449
8,105
48,318
(14,943
Collateralized agreements and collateralized financing, net
6,996
(15,286
(2,796
(7,944
Other assets and payables, net
(1,512
2,754
(4,818
460
(3,116
Due to/from affiliates, net
(10,960
12,399
(14,816
13,377
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(20,166
619
(16,993
12,725
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Dividends received/(paid)
1,685
(201
(1,484
(228
(25
Capital contributions from/(to) subsidiaries, net
(1,120
1,120
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
337
(226
(954
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
(136
1,040
(170
(2,329
1,731
22,690
48,518
(31,384
Principal payments of long-term borrowings
(5,437
(306
(28,047
17,475
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
17,446
(442
19,308
(12,348
(2,383
(49
1,361
377
3,435
534
4,369
(2,351
- 41 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended May 31, 2006
$ 1,056
$ 1,675
$ (2,731
(2,485
(246
2,731
166
(22
(184
(2
(1,080
2,135
(2,983
(10,777
(6,519
540
(1,016
4,912
6,651
(5,714
(4,303
(3,827
(13,844
(1,050
(148
527
(2,804
(3,475
(12,125
7,733
(3,435
7,827
(16,097
116
(12,023
5,155
352
(352
(20
(284
(100
384
(160
(120
(59
259
(6
1,360
4,390
18,533
13,309
(4,989
(4,321
(3,933
(1,325
13,473
15,276
(6,007
(2,784
(1
3,194
(852
447
2,434
(2,034
$ 1,269
$ 446
$ 5,628
$ (2,886
- 42 -
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
We have reviewed the consolidated statement of financial condition of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of May 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statement of income for the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six month periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial condition of the Company as of November 30, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year then ended and in our report dated February 13, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
New York, New York
July 10, 2007
- 43 -
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
PageNumber
Introduction
Forward-Looking Statements
Executive Overview
Consolidated Results of Operations
48
Geographic Revenues
56
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
57
Liquidity, Funding and Capital Resources
58
Lending-Related Commitments
67
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
Risk Management
Accounting and Regulatory Developments
Effects of Inflation
80
- 44 -
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (Holdings) and subsidiaries (collectively, the Company, the Firm, Lehman Brothers, we, us or our) serves the financial needs of corporations, governments and municipalities, institutional clients, and high net worth individuals worldwide with business activities organized in three segments Capital Markets, Investment Banking and Investment Management. Founded in 1850, Lehman Brothers maintains market presence in equity and fixed income sales, trading and research, investment banking, private investment management, asset management and private equity. The Firm is headquartered in New York, with regional headquarters in London and Tokyo, and operates in a network of offices in North America, Europe, the Middle East, Latin America and the Asia Pacific region. We are a member of all principal securities and commodities exchanges in the U.S., and we hold memberships or associate memberships on several principal international securities and commodities exchanges, including the London, Tokyo, Hong Kong, Frankfurt, Paris, Milan and Australian stock exchanges.
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) should be read together with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto contained in this Report and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in Holdings Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2006 (the Form 10-K). Unless specifically stated otherwise, all references in this MD&A to the 2007 and 2006 quarters and the three and six months reporting periods refer to the quarters or six-month periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, or the last day of such fiscal periods, as the context requires, and all references to quarters are to our fiscal quarters. Certain 2006 revenues have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
Some of the statements contained in this MD&A, including those relating to our strategy and other statements that are predictive in nature, that depend on or refer to future events or conditions or that include words such as expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, estimates and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These statements are not historical facts but instead represent only managements expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events. Similarly, these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, which may include, but are not limited to, market risk, the competitive environment, investor sentiment, liquidity risk, credit ratings changes, credit exposure, operational risk and legal and regulatory risks, changes and proceedings. For further discussion of these risks, see Risk Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCertain Factors Affecting Results of Operations in the Form 10-K.
As a global investment bank, the nature of our business makes predicting future performance difficult. Revenues and earnings may vary from quarter to quarter and from year to year. Caution should be used when extrapolating historical results to future periods. Our actual results and financial condition may differ, perhaps materially, from the anticipated results and financial condition in any such forward-looking statements and, accordingly, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Executive Overview1
We achieved record net revenues, net income and diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of 2007. These results were broad-based, driven by record performances in each of our three business segments and in our European and Asian regions.
Net revenues totaled $5.5 billion and $10.6 billion in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, up 25% and 19% from the corresponding 2006 periods. Net income totaled $1.3 billion and $2.4 billion in the 2007 three and six
1 Market share, volume and ranking statistics in the MD&A were obtained from Thomson Financial.
- 45 -
months, respectively, up 27% and 16% from the corresponding 2006 periods. Diluted earnings per common share were $2.21 and $4.17 in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, up 31% and 18% from the corresponding 2006 periods. Net income for the 2006 six months included an after-tax gain of $47 million ($0.08 per diluted share) from the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle associated with the Companys adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.123 (revised) Share-Based Payment(SFAS 123(R)).
Annualized return on average common stockholders equity was 25.8% and 25.1% in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to 23.7% and 25.2% in the corresponding 2006 periods. Annualized return on average tangible common stockholders equity was 31.6% and 30.7% in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to 29.5% and 31.5% in the corresponding 2006 periods.1
For a further discussion of results of operations by business segment and geographic region, see Business Segments and Geographic Revenues in this MD&A.
Business Environment
We believe a favorable business environment for a global investment bank is characterized by many factors, including a stable geopolitical climate, transparent financial markets, low inflation, low unemployment, global economic growth, and high business and investor confidence. These factors can influence (i) trading volumes, financial instrument and real estate valuations and client activity in secondary financial markets, which can affect our Capital Markets businesses, (ii) levels of debt and equity issuance and M&A activity, which can affect our Investment Banking business, and (iii) wealth creation, which can affect both our Capital Markets and Investment Management businesses.
The global market environment improved steadily over the period and generally was favorable for our business, despite slowing GDP growth in the U.S. and Japan. Global equities improved strongly following the sell-off at the end of the first quarter driven by better than expected earnings results in the U.S. and Europe. In fixed income markets, interest rate actions by major central banks were minimal during the first six months of fiscal 2007. Along with deep pools of global liquidity, these conditions provided a strong base for M&A and underwriting activities.
Fixed income markets.The global economy continued to grow in 2007, but at a slower rate than at the end of 2006. Global interest rate actions by major central banks were minimal during the quarter, with the European Central Bank and the Bank of England each raising interest rates once during the period. The U.S. and U.K. yield curves remained inverted during the quarter. Non-investment grade and emerging market credit spreads tightened to their all-time narrowest levels. Conversely, investment grade spreads widened slightly. The U.S. subprime mortgage sector remained challenged during the period; however, those conditions appeared to be isolated to that specific asset class and geography. Global debt underwriting activity increased 11% and 10% in the 2007 three and six month periods, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods, on higher issuances in virtually all products.
Equity markets. During the period, global equity markets rose 8% in local currency terms on substantially increased trading volumes, with the highest increases in Europe, followed by the U.S. The European FTSE and DAX indices increased 7% and 17%, respectively, with the New York Stock Exchange, Dow Jones Industrial Average, NASDAQ and S&P 500 indices rising 9%, 11%, 8% and 9%, respectively, during our second fiscal quarter. In Asia, the Nikkei and Hang Seng indices rose 2% and 5%, respectively, during our second fiscal quarter. Global average trading volumes (in U.S. dollar value terms) were up 13% for our second fiscal quarter, driven by increases of 23% and 13% in Europe and the U.S., respectively.
1 Annualized return on average common stockholders equity and annualized return on average tangible common stockholders equity are computed by dividing annualized net income applicable to common stock for the period by average common stockholders equity and average tangible common stockholders equity, respectively. We believe average tangible common stockholders equity is a meaningful measure because it reflects the common stockholders equity deployed in our businesses. Average tangible common stockholders equity equals average common stockholders equity less average identifiable intangible assets and goodwill and is computed as follows:
Average stockholders equity
$20,567
$17,738
$20,131
$17,423
Average preferred stock
(1,095
Average common stockholders equity
19,472
16,643
19,036
16,328
Average identifiable intangible assets and goodwill
(3,592
(3,290
(3,515
(3,278
Average tangible common stockholders equity
$15,880
$13,353
$15,521
$13,050
- 46 -
Mergers and acquisitions.Accessible funding, strong equity valuations, tight credit spreads, low volatility and a favorable interest rate environment led to continued strong M&A activity for the 2007 six month period. Announced M&A global market volumes increased 84% and 60% in the 2007 three and six month periods, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods, while completed M&A global market volumes increased 20% and 22% for the comparative periods.
Our results of operations can vary in response to global economic and market trends and geopolitical events. Over the remainder of calendar 2007, we expect the global economy to weather slowdowns in certain geographic regions. We estimate global GDP growth of 3.2% in calendar 2007, slower than calendar 2006, but a level that continues to be favorable for our industry. In spite of a slower growth pace, we believe global corporate profitability will be resilient. Our outlook related to interest rates remains positive. Specifically, we anticipate the following interest rate actions from central banks: the Federal Reserve Board will likely not change interest rates for the remainder of calendar 2007; the Bank of Japan will likely raise interest rates gradually over the remainder of calendar 2007; and the European Central Bank and the Bank of England will likely each raise interest rates two or more times during the remaining calendar year. We anticipate continued strength for the remainder of 2007 of capital markets activities across all regions, with prospects for growth in nonU.S. regions more favorable due to continued challenges in parts of the U.S. mortgage market.
Fixed income markets.We anticipate fixed income origination to remain strong, which in turn should have a positive impact on secondary market activities. We expect gross global debt origination in calendar 2007 to rise 6% to $10.2 trillion from the previous record in calendar 2006 of $9.6 trillion, passing the $10.0 trillion line for the first time in history. As growth continues in Europe and Asia, we believe these regions will account for a more significant portion of global issuance.
Our outlook remains positive for fixed income businesses on favorable fundamentals: unemployment is low, inflation appears consistent, consumer confidence remains strong and liquidity remains ample. We also expect both fixed income-related products and the fixed income investor base to continue to grow, with a global trend of more companies debt financing requirements being sourced from the debt capital markets. In addition, we believe capital markets will continue to represent a deeper and more viable source of liquidity, as investors continue to expand internationally and continue to utilize more complex risk mitigation tools to manage their portfolios.
The U.S. subprime mortgage business remained challenged during our second quarter. We anticipate that this part of the U.S. mortgage market, as well as certain aspects of the leveraged finance origination market, will face challenges in the second half of 2007.
Equity markets. We expect solid corporate profitability and continuing high levels of liquidity from multiple sources will continue to have a positive effect upon the equity markets in 2007 and anticipate the equity offering calendar will increase by 10% to 15% in calendar 2007, as businesses continue to look to raise capital. We believe global equity indices will gain 14% in calendar 2007 in local currency terms.
Mergers and acquisitions.We expect announced M&A activity in calendar 2007 to grow by 30% in total. Generally, we believe companies are looking for growth opportunities in the current market environment, and strategic M&A is a viable option, particularly for those companies with strong balance sheets and stock valuations. Combining the high levels of uninvested capital among financial sponsors and a continued favorable interest rate environment, we anticipate that financial sponsor-led M&A activity will remain strong.
Asset management and high net worth.We expect the rise of global equity indices and continued growth in economies to lead to further wealth creation. Based upon the growth in alternative products available in the market combined with favorable demographics and intergenerational wealth transfer, our outlook for asset management and services to high net worth individuals is positive. We anticipate this growth to be further supported by high net worth clients continuing to seek multiple providers and greater asset diversification along with increased service.
- 47 -
The following table sets forth an overview of our results of operations in 2007:
$1,879
$1,498
$ 3,578
$3,049
Net income(1)
$1,273
$1,002
$2,087
$ 2.21
$ 1.69
$ 4.17
$ 3.52
Annualized return on average common stockholders equity
25.8%
23.7%
25.1%
25.2%
Annualized return on average tangible common stockholders equity
31.6%
29.5%
30.7%
31.5%
(1) Net income in the first quarter of 2006 included an after-tax gain of $47 million, or $0.08 per diluted common share, as a cumulative effect of an accounting change associated with our adoption of SFAS 123(R) on December 1, 2005.
Net Revenues
$ 2,889
$ 2,589
$ 5,810
$ 5,051
11
$15,579
$11,515
$29,374
$21,822
Net interest revenues
$ 491
$ 223
$ 832
$ 569
Principal transactions, commissions and net interest revenues
$ 3,948
$ 3,324
$ 7,750
$ 6,620
- 48 -
$2,718
$2,175
$5,206
$4,374
Non-personnel expenses:
Brokerage, clearance and
distribution fees
9
$ 915
$ 738
$1,775
$1,449
$3,633
$2,913
$6,981
$5,823
Compensation and benefits/Net revenues
49.3
Non-personnel expenses/Net revenues
16.6
16.7
16.8
16.3
Non-interest expenses rose 25% and 20% in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. Significant portions of certain expense categories are variable, including compensation and benefits, brokerage, clearance and distribution fees, and business development. We expect these variable expenses as a percentage of net revenues to remain in approximately the same proportions for the remainder of 2007. The remaining non-personnel expense categories (technology and communications, occupancy, professional fees and other) are expected to change over time proportionate to our employee headcount levels. We continue to maintain a strict discipline in managing expenses.
Compensation and benefits. Compensation and benefits rose 25% and 19% in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods, commensurate with the 25% and 19% increases in net revenues in these respective periods. Compensation and benefits expense as a percentage of net revenues was 49.3% for both periods. Employees totaled approximately 28,000 at May 31, 2007 up 4% from approximately 27,000 at February 28, 2007, and up 22% from approximately 23,000 at May 31, 2006.
- 49 -
Compensation and benefits expense includes both fixed and variable components. Fixed compensation, consisting primarily of salaries, benefits and amortization of previously granted deferred equity awards, totaled $1.1 billion and $2.3 billion in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, an increase of 25% and 21% compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. The growth of fixed compensation was due primarily to the increase in salaries as a result of higher headcount, as well as an increase in the amortization of deferred equity awards from prior years. Variable compensation, consisting primarily of current year incentive compensation, commissions and severance, totaled $1.6 billion and $2.9 billion in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, an increase of 25% and 18% compared to the corresponding 2006 periods, as increases in incentive compensation is related to increases in net revenues.
Amortization of employee stock compensation awards totaled $346 million and $633 million in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to $251 million and $500 million in the corresponding 2006 periods.
Non-personnel expenses.Non-personnel expenses totaled $915 million and $1.8 billion in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, up 24% and 22% compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. Non-personnel expenses as a percentage of net revenues were 16.6% and 16.8% in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to 16.7% and 16.3% in the corresponding 2006 periods. The increase in non-personnel expenses in the 2007 three and six months compared to the corresponding 2006 periods reflects higher brokerage, clearance and distribution fees on increased trading volumes, increased professional fees for recruitment and training of employees, as well as investments in business development, technology and communications as we continue to build out and grow our business.
Technology and communications expenses rose 21% and 19% in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods, reflecting increased costs associated with the continued expansion and development of our business platforms and infrastructure. Brokerage, clearance and distribution fees rose 27% and 32% in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods, due primarily to higher transaction volumes in certain Capital Markets and Investment Management products. Occupancy expenses increased 9% and 6% in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods due to continued expansion in the U.S. and Asia (including India). Professional fees and business development expenses increased 40% and 39% in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods primarily due to employee growth as well as higher levels of business activity.
During the fiscal quarter ended May 31, 2007, we had the following business acquisitions and strategic investing activity.
Business Acquisitions.Within our Capital Markets segment, we acquired Grange Securities Limited (Grange), a full service Australian broker dealer specializing in fixed income products and Congress Life, a life insurance company with licenses in 43 U.S. states. A portion of the consideration paid to shareholders of Grange consisted of shares of Holdings common stock. For more information, see Part II, Item 2, Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds, in this report. Within our Investment Management segment, we made the final contingent payment under a 2004 deferred transaction agreement for the remaining 50% of Lehman Brothers Alternative Investment Management (LBAIM), which manages fund of hedge fund portfolios and investment products for institutional and high-net-worth private clients. LBAIM was previously consolidated in Holdings results of operations. As a result of these acquisitions, our goodwill and intangible assets increased by approximately $190 million.
Subsequent to the end of the second quarter, we acquired Eagle Energy Partners I, L.P. (Eagle), a Texas-based energy marketing and services company that manages and optimizes supply, transportation, transmission, load and
- 50 -
storage portfolios on behalf of wholesale natural gas and power clients. A portion of the consideration paid to shareholders of Eagle consisted of shares of Holdings common stock.
Strategic Investments.During the quarter we acquired a 20% interest in the D.E. Shaw group, a global investment management firm, and a minority interest in Wilton Re, a U.S. re-insurer that focuses on the reinsurance of mortality risk on life insurance policies.
Our operations are organized into three business segments:
· Capital Markets,
· Investment Banking; and
· Investment Management.
These business segments generate revenues from institutional, corporate, government and high net worth individual clients across each of the revenue categories in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Net revenues and expenses contain certain internal allocations, including funding costs and regional transfer pricing which are centrally managed.
The following table summarizes selected financial data for our business segments:
Net revenues:
Capital Markets
$3,594
$3,078
$7,096
$6,124
Investment Banking
Investment Management
Total net revenues
Non-personnel expenses
Income before taxes (1)
$3,578
(1) Excludes after-tax gain of $47 million as a cumulative effect of an accounting change associated with our adoption of SFAS 123(R) in 2006.
Our Capital Markets segment is divided into two components:
Fixed Income We make markets in and trade municipal and public sector instruments, interest rate and credit products, mortgage-related securities and loan products, currencies and commodities. We also originate mortgages and we structure and enter into a variety of derivative transactions. We also provide research covering economic, quantitative, strategic, credit, relative value, index and portfolio analyses. Additionally, we provide financing, advice and servicing activities to the hedge fund community, known as prime brokerage services.
Equities We make markets in and trade equities and equity-related products and enter into a variety of derivative transactions. We also provide equity-related research coverage as well as execution and clearing activities for clients. Through our capital markets prime services, we provide pre- and post- trade financing, advice and servicing to the hedge fund community. We also engage in proprietary trading activities and principal investing in real estate and private equity.
- 51 -
Capital Markets Results of Operations
$ 2,646
$ 2,388
$ 5,403
$ 4,739
393
433
774
755
10,547
7,321
19,624
13,511
49
(24
34
Non-interest expenses
2,241
1,865
3,709
$ 1,353
$ 1,213
$ 2,722
$ 2,415
Capital Markets net revenues were a record in both the 2007 three and six months, increasing 17% and 16%, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. Net revenues in 2007 were driven by Equities net revenues and a higher contribution from non-U.S. regions. Declines in Fixed Income net revenues partially offset the periods growth.
Interest and dividends revenue and Interest expense are a function of the level and mix of total assets and liabilities (primarily financial instruments owned and sold but not yet purchased, and collateralized borrowing and lending activities), the prevailing level of interest rates and the term structure of our financings. Interest and dividends revenue and Interest expense are integral components of our evaluation of our overall Capital Markets activities. Net interest revenues for the 2007 three and six months increased 129% and 52%, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods, primarily attributable to higher short-term U.S. financing rates and a change in the mix of asset composition. Interest and dividends revenue rose 44% and 45% in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods, and interest expense rose 41% and 45% in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods.
Non-interest expenses for the 2007 three and six months increased 20% and 18%, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. Technology and communications expenses increased due to the continued expansion and development of our business platforms and infrastructure. Brokerage, clearance and distribution fees rose due primarily to higher transaction volumes across most Capital Markets products. Professional fees and business development expenses increased due to employee growth as well as higher levels of business activity.
Income before taxes increased 12% and 13% for the 2007 three and six months compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. Pre-tax margins for the 2007 three and six months were 38% compared to 39% for the 2006 three and six months.
Capital Markets Net Revenues
Fixed Income
$1,891
$2,200
(14
)%
$4,055
$4,302
Equities
1,703
878
94
3,041
1,822
Fixed Income net revenues decreased 14% and 6% for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. The decrease for the 2007 three and six months was mainly attributable to lower revenues from securitized products, partially offset by strong results from credit and real estate products. Securitized product revenues for the 2007 three and six months declined versus the corresponding 2006 periods due to a compression of securitization and origination margins, particularly in subprime products. We continue to
- 52 -
actively risk manage our mortgage-related positions through dynamic risk management strategies. High yield credit product revenues were strong for the three and six months, mainly due to secondary trading activity associated with a strong origination calendar, significant increase in customer activity and tightening of high yield credit spreads. Real estate revenues increased for the 2007 three and six months compared to 2006 due to higher real estate valuations and improved commercial mortgage-backed securities transaction volumes. Liquid market product revenues for the 2007 three months were slightly higher compared to the corresponding 2006 period and decreased significantly for the 2007 six months from the comparable 2006 period as a result of lower customer demand and less profitable trading strategies.
Global residential mortgage origination volumes were consistent across periods at approximately $17 billion and $32 billion in the 2007 three and six months, respectively, and approximately $16 billion and $31 billion for the 2006 three and six months. Global residential securitization volumes (including both originated loans and those we acquired in the secondary market) were approximately $37 billion and $60 billion for the 2007 three and six months, compared to $33 billion and $67 billion in the corresponding 2006 periods.
Equities net revenues increased 94% and 67% to a record $1.7 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively, for the 2007 three and six months compared to $878 million and $1.8 billion for the corresponding 2006 periods, mainly driven by continued growth in execution services, equity derivatives and prime brokerage activities, coupled with profitable trading strategies. Execution services had record revenues for the 2007 three months and strong revenues for the 2007 six months, as global equity indices rose and trading volumes increased 14% for both the 2007 three and six months. Equity derivatives had record revenues for the 2007 three months and strong revenues for the 2007 six months, primarily attributable to increased customer activity and profitable trading strategies. Prime brokerage and financing business revenues were a record for the 2007 three months and strong for the 2007 six months due to continued addition of new clients and growth in balances for existing clients.
We take an integrated approach to client coverage, organizing bankers into industry, product and geographic groups within our Investment Banking segment. Business services provided to corporations and governments worldwide can be separated into:
Advisory Services We provide business advisory services with respect to mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings and other corporate activities.
Investment Banking Results of Operations
Investment banking net revenues(1)
$1,150
$741
$2,000
$1,576
812
1,472
1,182
$ 338
$164
$ 528
$ 394
(1) Investment banking revenues are net of related underwriting expenses.
Investment Banking net revenues for the three and six months ended 2007 increased 55% and 27%, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods, driven by record revenues in both Global Finance and Advisory Services.
Non-interest expenses rose 41% and 25% for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods, primarily attributable to an increase in compensation and benefits expense and business development expense.
Income before taxes was $338 million and $528 million for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, which increased 106% and 34% compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. Pre-tax margin increased to 29% and 26% for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, which is up from 22% and 25% compared to the corresponding
- 53 -
2006 periods.
Investment Banking Revenues1
Global FinanceDebt
$ 540
$289
$ 968
$ 699
38
Global FinanceEquity
333
208
60
508
407
Advisory Services
277
244
524
470
Global FinanceDebt net revenues of $540 million and $968 million for the 2007 three and six months increased 87% and 38%, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. These results were primarily attributable to record leveraged finance revenue. On a year-to-date comparison basis, the percentage increase in our Global FinanceDebt volumes was lower than the percentage increase in the overall market; however, as compared to the prior quarter, the percentage increase in our volumes rose more than that of the overall market. Our debt origination fee backlog at May 31, 2007 is $616 million. Debt origination backlog may not be indicative of the level of future business due to the frequent use of the shelf registration process and changes in overall market conditions.
Global FinanceEquity net revenues reached $333 million and $508 million for the 2007 three and six months, an increase of 60% and 25%, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. The increase is primarily due to strong IPO-related revenues and higher client solution activity associated with capital market transactions compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. The continued development of our Global FinanceEquity practice in the Asian region contributed to this overall performance. Our equity underwriting market volumes for the three months ended May 31, 2007 increased 29% compared to the three months ended May 31, 2006, the percentage increase in our volumes was more than that of the overall market. Our equity-related fee backlog (for both filed and unfiled transactions) at May 31, 2007 is $422 million; however, that measure may not be indicative of the level of future business due to changes in overall market conditions.
Advisory Services net revenues of $277 million and $524 million for the 2007 three and six months represent an increase of 14% and 11%, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. Our completed transaction volumes for the 2007 three and six months increased 70% and 84%, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods while industry-wide completed transaction volumes increased 20% and 22% over the same three- and six-month periods. Similarly and over the same comparative periods, our announced transaction volumes increased 133% and 99%, respectively, compared to industry-wide announced transaction volumes that increased 84% and 60%. Our M&A fee backlog at May 31, 2007 is a record $521 million; however, our M&A fee backlog may not be indicative of the level of future business due to changes in overall market conditions.
The Investment Management business segment consists of:
Private Investment Management We provide investment, wealth advisory and capital markets execution services to high net worth and middle market institutional clients.
1 Debt and equity underwriting volumes are based on full credit for single-book managers and equal credit for joint-book managers. Debt underwriting volumes include both publicly registered and Rule 144A issues of high grade and high yield bonds, sovereign, agency and taxable municipal debt, non-convertible preferred stock and mortgage- and asset-backed securities. Equity underwriting volumes include both publicly registered and Rule 144A issues of common stock and convertibles. Because publicly reported debt and equity underwriting volumes do not necessarily correspond to the amount of securities actually underwritten and do not include certain private placements and other transactions, and because revenue rates vary among transactions, publicly reported debt and equity underwriting volumes may not be indicative of revenues in a given period. Additionally, because Advisory Services volumes are based on full credit to each of the advisors in a transaction, and because revenue rates vary among transactions, Advisory Services volumes may not be indicative of revenues in a given period.
- 54 -
Investment Management Results of Operations
$243
$118
$ 407
$ 240
175
334
304
23
326
772
640
275
265
580
471
1,135
932
$188
$121
$ 328
Investment Management achieved net revenues of $768 million and $1.5 billion for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, which increased 30% and 25% compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. Both Asset Management and Private Investment Management achieved record net revenues in the 2007 three and six months.
Non-interest expense rose 23% and 22% for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods, driven by higher compensation and benefits related to higher level of revenues and headcount, as well as increased non-personnel expenses from continued expansion of the business, especially in non-Americas regions.
Income before taxes was $188 million and $328 million for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, which increased 55% and 37% compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. Pre-tax margin increased to 24% and 22% for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, from 20% in each corresponding 2006 period.
The following tables set forth our Asset Management and Private Investment Management net revenues. Changes in and composition of assets under management are also presented.
Asset Management
$460
$347
$ 876
$ 715
Private Investment Management
308
245
587
457
$768
$592
$1,463
$1,172
Asset Management net revenues increased 33% and 23% to a record $460 million and $876 million for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. These results were achieved through strong growth in assets under management across most products, increases in management fees and gains from minority investments in alternative asset managers.
Private Investment Management net revenues rose 26% and 28% to a record $308 million and $587 million for the three and six months, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2006 periods. The record results were driven by increased client activity across most products.
- 55 -
In billions
Opening balance
$236
$225
$175
Net additions
Net market appreciation
N/M
180
Total increase
$ 27
$ 38
$ 23
Ending balance
$263
$198
Assets under management rose to a record $263 billion at May 31, 2007, up from $236 billion at February 28, 2007 and $225 billion at November 30, 2006. The increase reflects: (i) net inflows of $16 billion from February 28, 2007 and $24 billion from November 30, 2006; and (ii) net market appreciation of $11 billion from February 28, 2007 and $14 billion from November 30, 2006.
Assets under management at May 31, 2007 increased $65 billion or 33% compared to May 31, 2006, composed of net inflows of $41 billion plus net market appreciation of $24 billion.
Percent Change
to May 31, 2007
May 31, 2006
Equity
$108
$ 95
$ 86
Fixed income
Money markets
Alternative investments
- 56 -
Non-Americas net revenues rose to a record $2.6 billion and $4.6 billion for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, representing increases from the corresponding 2006 periods of 66% and 40%. Non-U.S. net revenues represented 48% and 44% of total net revenues for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, in comparison to the corresponding 2006 periods, in which the non-U.S. share of net revenues was 36% and 38%. These increases were achieved through record revenues in Capital Markets, Investment Banking and Investment Management in our European region, and record revenues in Capital Markets in our Asian region.
Net revenues in Europe were $1.8 billion and $3.2 billion for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, representing increases from the corresponding 2006 periods of 68% and 45%. The regions Capital Markets net revenues were driven by significant improvements in real estate and credit products. Investment Banking net revenues increased due to strong performances in mergers and acquisitions and leveraged finance. Investment Management net revenues rose on gains from minority stake investments in asset managers, successful Private Equity fund launches and record assets under management balances.
Our Asia Pacific geographic segments net revenues increased to $762 million and $1.4 billion for the 2007 three and six months, respectively, representing increases from the corresponding 2006 periods of 62% and 29%. Capital Markets was driven by strong performances in real estate, collateralized debt obligations, equity volatility and prime brokerage services. Investment Banking was driven by a strong performance within the equity origination and debt origination businesses, especially in China.
Net revenues by geographic region are based upon the location of the senior coverage banker or investment advisor in the case of Investment Banking or Asset Management, respectively, or where the position was risk managed in the case of Capital Markets and Private Investment Management. Additionally, certain revenues associated with U.S. products and services that result from relationships with international clients have been classified as international revenues using an allocation consistent with our internal reporting.
The following is a summary of our critical accounting policies that may involve a higher degree of management judgment and in some instances complexity in application. For a further discussion of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
We make estimates in certain circumstances required by generally accepted accounting principles. Those estimates affect reported amounts and disclosures. In preparing our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes, management makes estimates in determining: fair value of financial instruments; valuation of identifiable, intangible assets and goodwill; potential losses from litigation, regulatory proceedings and/or tax examinations; recognition of deferred taxes; and fair value of equity based compensation. Estimates incorporated into reported amounts may materially differ from actual results.
- 57 -
We measure Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned, excluding Real estate held for sale, and Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased at fair value. We account for Real estate held for sale at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Gains or losses from Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned and Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased are reflected in Principal transactions in the Consolidated Statement of Income as incurred.
We adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) in the first quarter of 2007. Fair value measurements approximate the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The degree of judgment utilized in measuring the fair value of financial instruments generally correlates to the level of pricing observability. Financial instruments with readily available active quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively quoted prices in active markets generally have more pricing observability and less judgment utilized in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial instruments rarely traded or not quoted have less observability and are measured at fair value using valuation models that require more judgment. Pricing observability is impacted by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, whether the financial instrument is new to the market and not yet established and the characteristics specific to the transaction.
For a further discussion regarding the measure of Financial instruments and other inventory positions owned, excluding Real estate held for sale, and Financial instruments and other inventory positions sold but not yet purchased at fair value, see Note 4, Fair Value of Financial Instruments to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Identifiable Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Determining the carrying values and useful lives of certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed associated with business acquisitionsintangible assets in particularrequires significant judgment. At least annually and using measurement techniques, we are required to assess whether goodwill and other intangible assets have been impaired. Periodically estimating the fair value of a reporting unit and carrying values of intangible assets with indefinite lives involves significant judgment and often involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions could have a significant effect on whether or not an impairment charge is recognized and the magnitude of such a charge. We completed our last impairment test on goodwill and other intangible assets as of August 31, 2006, and no impairment was identified.
Special Purpose Entities
We enter into various transactions with special purpose entities (SPEs). The assessment of whether accounting criteria for consolidation are met requires management to exercise judgment. We undertake analyses regarding the future performance of assets held by the SPE that require estimates of the fair value of assets, future cash flows, market and credit risk and other significant factors. Additionally, we make judgments as to whether the SPEs activities are sufficiently limited. For a further discussion, see Note 6, Securitizations and Special Purpose Entities to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Legal, Regulatory and Tax Proceedings
In the normal course of business we have been named as a defendant in a number of lawsuits and other legal and regulatory proceedings. Such proceedings include actions brought against us and others with respect to transactions in which we acted as an underwriter or financial advisor, actions arising out of our activities as a broker or dealer in securities and commodities and actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants against many securities firms, including us. In addition, our business activities are reviewed by various taxing authorities around the world with regard to corporate income tax rules and regulations. We provide for potential losses that may arise out of legal, regulatory and tax proceedings to the extent such losses are probable and can be estimated. Those determinations require significant judgment. For a further discussion, see Note 8, Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We establish guidelines for the level and composition of our liquidity pool and asset funding; the makeup and size of our balance sheet; and the utilization of our equity. Management monitors our adherence to these guidelines.
- 58 -
Liquidity
Liquidity pool. We maintain a liquidity pool available to Holdings that covers expected cash outflows for twelve months in a stressed liquidity environment. In assessing the required size of our liquidity pool, we assume that assets outside the liquidity pool cannot be sold to generate cash, unsecured debt cannot be issued, and any cash and unencumbered liquid collateral outside of the liquidity pool cannot be used to support the liquidity of Holdings. Our liquidity pool is sized to cover expected cash outflows associated with the following items:
· The repayment of all unsecured debt maturing in the next twelve months.
· The funding of commitments to extend credit made by Holdings and certain unregulated subsidiaries based on a probabilistic model. The funding of commitments to extend credit made by our regulated subsidiaries (including our banks) is covered by the liquidity pools maintained by these regulated subsidiaries. For additional information, see Lending-Related Commitments in this MD&A and Note 8, Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
· The anticipated impact of adverse changes on secured funding either in the form of a greater difference between the market and pledge value of assets (also known as haircuts) or in the form of reduced borrowing availability.
· The anticipated funding requirements of equity repurchases as we manage our equity base (including offsetting the dilutive effect of our employee incentive plans). See Equity Management below.
In addition, the liquidity pool is sized to cover the impact of a one notch downgrade of Holdings long-term debt ratings, including the additional collateral that would be required for our derivative contracts and other secured funding arrangements. See Credit Ratings below.
The liquidity pool is invested in highly liquid instruments, including cash equivalents, G-7 government bonds and U.S. agency securities, investment grade asset and mortgagebacked securities and other liquid securities that we believe have a highly reliable pledge value. We calculate our liquidity pool on a daily basis.
At May 31, 2007, the estimated pledge value of the liquidity pool available to Holdings was $25.7 billion, which is in excess of the items discussed above. Additionally, our regulated subsidiaries, such as our broker-dealers and bank institutions, maintain their own liquidity pools to cover their stand-alone one year expected cash funding needs in a stressed liquidity environment. The estimated pledge value of the liquidity pools held by our regulated subsidiaries totaled an additional $53.9 billion at May 31, 2007.
Funding of assets.We fund assets based on their liquidity characteristics, and utilize cash capital1 to provide financing for our long-term funding needs. Our funding strategy incorporates the following factors:
· Liquid assets (i.e., assets for which a reliable secured funding market exists across all market environments including government bonds, U.S. agency securities, corporate bonds, asset-backed securities and high quality equity securities) are primarily funded on a secured basis.
· Secured funding haircuts are funded with cash capital.
· Illiquid assets (e.g., fixed assets, intangible assets, and margin postings) and less liquid inventory positions (e.g., derivatives, private equity investments, certain corporate loans, certain commercial mortgages and real estate positions) are funded with cash capital.
· Unencumbered assets, which are not part of the liquidity pool irrespective of asset quality, are also funded with cash capital. These assets are typically unencumbered because of operational and asset-specific factors (e.g., securities moving between depots). We do not assume a change in these factors during a stressed liquidity event.
As part of our funding strategy, we also take steps to mitigate our main sources of contingent liquidity risk as follows:
· Commitments to extend credit - Cash capital is utilized to cover a probabilistic estimate of expected funding of commitments to extend credit. For a further discussion of our commitments, see Lending-
1 Cash capital consists of stockholders equity, portions of core deposit liabilities at our bank subsidiaries, and liabilities with remaining terms of over one year.
- 59 -
Related Commitments in this MD&A and Note 8, Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
· Ratings downgrade - Cash capital is utilized to cover the liquidity impact of a one notch downgrade on Holdings. A ratings downgrade would increase the amount of collateral to be posted against our derivative contracts and other secured funding arrangements. For a further discussion on the credit ratings and its effects, see Credit Ratings below.
· Client financing - We provide secured financing to our clients typically through repurchase and prime broker agreements. These financing activities can create liquidity risk if the availability and terms of our secured borrowing agreements adversely change during a stressed liquidity event and we are unable to reflect these changes in our client financing agreements. We mitigate this risk by entering into term secured borrowing agreements, in which we can fund different types of collateral at pre-determined collateralization levels, and by maintaining liquidity pools at our regulated broker-dealers.
Our policy is to operate with an excess of long-term funding sources over our long-term funding requirements (cash capital surplus). We seek to maintain a cash capital surplus at Holdings of at least $2.0 billion. As of May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, our cash capital surplus at Holdings totaled $2.5 billion and $6.0 billion, respectively. Additionally, cash capital surpluses in regulated entities at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006 amounted to $9.2 billion and $10.0 billion, respectively.
We hedge the majority of foreign exchange risk associated with investments in subsidiaries in nonU.S. dollar currencies using long-term debt and forwards.
Diversification of funding sources. We seek to diversify our funding sources. We issue long-term debt in multiple currencies and across a wide range of maturities to tap many investor bases, thereby reducing our reliance on any one source.
· During 2007, we issued $39.8 billion of long-term borrowings. Long-term borrowings (less current portion) increased to $100.8 billion at May 31, 2007 from $81.2 billion at November 30, 2006 principally to support the growth in our assets, as well as pre-funding a portion of 2007 maturities. The weighted-average maturities of long-term borrowings were 6.7 years and 6.3 years at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
· We diversify our issuances geographically to minimize refinancing risk and broaden our debt-holder base. As of May 31, 2007, 53% of our long-term debt was issued outside the United States.
· We typically issue in sufficient size to create a liquid benchmark issuance (i.e., sufficient size to be included in the Lehman Bond Index, a widely used index for fixed income asset managers).
· In order to minimize refinancing risk, we establish threshold amounts of our long-term borrowings anticipated to mature within any quarter (12.5%), half-year (17.5%) and full-year (30.0%) intervals. At May 31, 2007, those limits were $12.6 billion, $17.6 billion and $30.2 billion, respectively. If we were to operate with debt above these levels, we would not include the additional amount as a source of cash capital.
Long-term debt is accounted for in our long-term-borrowings maturity profile at its contractual maturity date if the debt is redeemable at our option. Long-term debt that is repayable at par at the holders option is included in these limits at its earliest redemption date. Extendible issuances (in which, unless debt holders instruct us to redeem their debt instruments at least one year prior to stated maturity, the maturity date of these instruments is automatically extended) are included in these limits at their earliest maturity date. Based on experience, we expect the majority of these extendibles to remain outstanding beyond their earliest maturity date in a normal market environment and roll through the long-term borrowings maturity profile.
- 60 -
The quarterly long-term borrowings maturity schedule over the next five years at May 31, 2007 is as follows:
Long-Term Borrowings Maturity Profile Chart(1)
(1) Included in long-term debt is $2.2 billion of structured notes with contingent early redemption features linked to market prices or other triggering events (e.g., the downgrade of a reference obligation underlying a credit-linked note). In the above maturity table, these notes are shown at their contractual maturity. In determining the cash capital value of these notes, however, we exclude the portion reasonably expected to mature within twelve months, $0.5 billion, from our cash capital sources at May 31, 2007.
· We use both committed and uncommitted bilateral and syndicated long-term bank facilities to complement our long-term debt issuance. In particular, Holdings maintains a $2.0 billion unsecured, committed revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks which expires in February 2009. In addition, we maintain a $2.5 billion multi-currency unsecured, committed revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks for Lehman Brothers Bankhaus AG (Bankhaus) which expires in April 2010. Our ability to borrow under such facilities is conditioned on complying with customary lending conditions and covenants. We have maintained compliance with the material covenants under these credit agreements at all times. As of May 31, 2007, there were no borrowings against Holdings or Bankhaus credit facilities, although under both facilities we borrowed and re-paid those borrowings during the three month period.
· We have established a $2.4 billion conduit that issues secured liquidity notes to pre-fund high grade loan commitments. This is fully backed by a triple-A rated, third-party, one-year revolving liquidity back stop. Additionally, we have established a conduit that issues secured liquid notes to provide funding for our contingent acquisition commitments. We are contingently committed to provide financing to the conduit if the conduit is unable to remarket the secured liquidity notes upon their maturity, generally in two years time.
- 61 -
· Bank facilities provide us with further diversification and flexibility. For example, we draw on our committed syndicated credit facilities described above on a regular basis (typically 25% to 50% of the time on a weighted- average basis) to provide us with additional sources of long-term funding on an as-needed basis. We have the ability to prepay and redraw any number of times and to retain the proceeds for any term up to the maturity date of the facility. As a result, we see these facilities as having the same liquidity value as long-term borrowings with the same maturity dates, and we include these borrowings in our reported long-term borrowings at the facilitys stated final maturity date to the extent that they are outstanding as of a reporting date.
· We own three bank entities: Lehman Brothers Bank, a U.S.-based thrift institution, Lehman Brothers Commercial Bank, a U.S.-based industrial bank, and Bankhaus, a German bank. These regulated bank entities operate in a deposit-protected environment and are able to source low-cost unsecured funds that are primarily term deposits. These are generally insulated from a company-specific or market liquidity event, thereby providing a reliable funding source for our mortgage products and selected loan assets and increasing our funding diversification. Overall, these bank institutions have raised $21.7 billion and $21.4 billion of customer deposit liabilities as of May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
Funding action plan. We have developed and regularly update a Funding Action Plan, which represents a detailed action plan to manage a stress liquidity event, including a communication plan for regulators, creditors, investors and clients. The Funding Action Plan considers two types of liquidity stress eventsa Company-specific event, where there are no issues with the overall market liquidity; and a broader market-wide event, which affects not just our Company but the entire market.
In a Company-specific event, we assume we would lose access to the unsecured funding market for a full year and have to rely on the liquidity pool available to Holdings to cover expected cash outflows over the next twelve months.
In a market liquidity event, in addition to the pressure of a Company-specific event, we also assume that, because the event is market wide, some counterparties to whom we have extended liquidity facilities draw on these facilities. To mitigate the effect of a market liquidity event, we have developed access to additional liquidity sources beyond the liquidity pool at Holdings, including unutilized funding capacity in our bank entities and unutilized capacity in our bank facilities. (See Funding of assets above.)
We perform regular assessments of our funding requirements in stress liquidity scenarios to best ensure we can meet all our funding obligations in all market environments.
Legal entity structure. Our legal entity structure can constrain liquidity available to Holdings. Some of our legal entities, particularly our regulated broker-dealers and bank institutions, are restricted in the amount of funds that they can distribute or lend to Holdings.
Certain regulated subsidiaries are funded with subordinated debt issuances and/or subordinated loans from Holdings, which are counted as regulatory capital for those subsidiaries. Our policy is to fund subordinated debt advances by Holdings to subsidiaries for use as regulatory capital with long-term debt issued by Holdings having a maturity at least one year greater than the maturity of the subordinated debt advance.
- 62 -
At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006 our net assets were composed of the following items:
$ 605,861
$ 503,545
(7,154
(6,091
(8,317
(6,099
(130,953
(117,490
(118,118
(101,567
Identifiable intangible assets and goodwill
(3,652
(3,362
Net assets
$ 337,667
$ 268,936
Assets. At May 31, 2007, our total assets increased by 20% to $605.9 billion from $503.5 billion at November 30, 2006, due to an increase in secured financing transactions and net assets. Net assets at May 31, 2007 increased $68.7 billion due to increases across all inventory categories, as well as an increase in client secured receivables, as capital markets activities continue to increase. Mortgage and mortgage-backed positions owned increased primarily as a result of higher commercial mortgage loans, as well as an increase in residential mortgage loans for which the Company is not at risk (i.e., loans sold to securitization trusts which did not meet the criteria under SFAS 140 for sale treatment for a further discussion of our inventory, see Note 3, Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions, and Note 6, Securitizations and Special Purpose Entities, to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
Our calculation of Net assets excludes: (i) certain low-risk, non-inventory assets (including Cash and securities segregated and on deposit for regulatory and other purposes, Securities received as collateral, Securities purchased under agreements to resell and Securities borrowed); and (ii) Identifiable intangible assets and goodwill. We believe net assets to be a more useful measure of our assets because it excludes certain low-risk, non-inventory assets. Our calculation of Net assets may not be comparable to other, similarly titled calculations by other companies as a result of different calculation methodologies.
Illiquid Assets. Our balance sheet contains assets of a less liquid nature, primarily those categorized as Real estate held for sale, certain High yield instruments and Private equity and other principal investments.
Real estate held for sale. We invest in real estate through direct investments in equity and debt. We record real estate held for sale at the lower of its carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. The assessment of fair value less cost to sell generally requires the use of management estimates and generally is based on property appraisals provided by third parties and also incorporates an analysis of the related property cash flow projections. We had real estate investments of approximately $15.9 billion and $9.4 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively. Because portions of these assets have been financed on a non-recourse basis, our net investment position was limited to $12.5 billion and $5.9 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
High yield instruments. We underwrite, syndicate, invest in and make markets in high yield corporate debt securities and loans. For purposes of this discussion, high yield instruments are defined as securities of or loans to companies rated BB+ or lower or equivalent ratings by recognized credit rating agencies, as well as non-rated securities or loans that, in managements opinion, are non-investment grade. High yield debt instruments generally involve greater risks than investment grade instruments and loans due to the issuers creditworthiness and the lower liquidity of the market for such instruments, generally. In addition, these issuers generally have relatively higher levels of indebtedness resulting in an increased sensitivity to adverse economic conditions. We seek to reduce these risks through active hedging strategies and through the diversification of our products and counterparties.
- 63 -
High yield instruments are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reflected in Principal transactions in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Our high yield instruments at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006 were as follows:
Bonds and loans in liquid trading markets
$17,066
$11,481
Loans held awaiting securitization and/or syndication(1)
3,048
4,132
Loans and bonds with little or no pricing transparency
405
316
High yield instruments
20,519
15,929
Credit risk hedges(2)
(2,424
(3,111
High yield position, net
$18,095
$12,818
(1) Loans held awaiting securitization and/or syndication primarily represent warehouse lending activities for collateralized loan obligations.
(2) Credit risk hedges represent financial instruments with offsetting risk to the same underlying counterparty, but exclude other credit and market risk mitigants which are highly correlated, such as index, basket and/or sector hedges.
At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, the largest industry concentrations were 34% and 20%, respectively, both periods concentrations were within the finance and insurance industry classifications. The largest geographic concentrations at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006 were 58% and 53%, respectively, in the Americas. We mitigate our aggregate and single-issuer net exposure through the use of derivatives, non-recourse financing and other financial instruments.
Private equity and other principal investments.Our Private Equity business operates in six major asset classes: Merchant Banking, Real Estate, Venture Capital, Credit-Related Investments, Private Funds Investments and Infrastructure. We have raised privately-placed funds in these asset classes, for which we act as general partner and in which we have general and in many cases limited partner interests. In addition, we generally co-invest in the investments made by the funds or may make other non-fund-related direct investments. At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, our private equity related investments totaled $3.2 billion and $2.1 billion, respectively. The real estate industry represented the highest concentrations at 27% and 30% at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively, and the largest single investment was approximately $203 million and $80 million, at those respective dates.
Our private equity investments are measured at fair value based on our assessment of each underlying investment, incorporating valuations that consider expected cash flows, earnings multiples and/or comparisons to similar market transactions among other factors. Valuation adjustments, which usually involve the use of significant management estimates, are an integral part of pricing these instruments, reflecting consideration of credit quality, concentration risk, sale restrictions and other liquidity factors. For additional information about our private equity and other principal investment activities, including related commitments, see Note 8, Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Equity Management
The management of equity is a critical aspect of our capital management. Determining the appropriate amount of equity capital base is dependent on a number of variables, including the amount of equity needed given our estimation of risk in our business activities; the capital required by laws or regulations, leverage thresholds required by the consolidated supervised entity (CSE) rules, and credit rating agencies perspectives of capital sufficiency.
We continuously evaluate deployment alternatives for our equity with the objective of maximizing shareholder value. In periods where we determine our levels of equity to be beyond those necessary to support our business activities, we may return capital to shareholders through dividend payments or stock repurchases.
We maintain a stock repurchase program to manage our equity capital. In January 2007, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase, subject to market conditions, of up to 100 million shares of Holdings common stock for the management of our equity capital, including offsetting dilution due to employee stock awards. This authorization superseded the stock repurchase program authorized in 2006. Our stock repurchase program is effected through regular open-market purchases, as well as through employee transactions where employees tender shares of common
- 64 -
stock to pay for the exercise price of stock options, and the required tax withholding obligations upon option exercises and conversion of restricted stock units (RSUs) to freely-tradable common stock.
Over the course of our 2007 second quarter, we repurchased through open-market purchases or withheld from employees for the purposes described above approximately 7.2 million shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of approximately $532 million, or $73.83 per share. In total, we repurchased and withheld 28.2 million shares during 2007 for a total consideration of approximately $2.2 billion. During 2007, we issued 9.1 million shares resulting from employee stock option exercises and another 15.0 million shares were issued out of treasury stock to an irrevocable grantor trust (the RSU Trust).
Capital Ratios
Net Leverage. The relationship of assets to equity is one measure of a companys capital adequacy. Generally, this ratio is computed by dividing assets by stockholders equity. We believe that a more meaningful, comparative ratio for companies in the securities industry is net leverage, which is the result of net assets divided by tangible equity capital.
Our net leverage ratio is calculated as net assets divided by tangible equity capital. We calculate net assets by excluding from total assets: (i) cash and securities segregated and on deposit for regulatory and other purposes; (ii) securities received as collateral; (iii) securities purchased under agreements to resell, (iv) securities borrowed; and (v) identifiable intangible assets and goodwill. We believe net leverage based on net assets to be a more useful measure of leverage, because it excludes certain low-risk, non-inventory assets and utilizes tangible equity capital as a measure of our equity base. We calculate tangible equity capital by including stockholders equity and junior subordinated notes and excluding identifiable intangible assets and goodwill. We believe net leverage based on tangible equity to be a more meaningful measure of our equity base as it includes instruments we consider to be equity-like due to their subordinated nature, long-term maturity and interest deferral features and excludes that which we do not consider available to support our remaining net assets. These measures may not be comparable to other, similarly titled calculations by other companies as a result of different calculation methodologies.
Tangible equity capital, leverage and net leverage are computed as follows at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006:
Junior subordinated notes (1), (2)
4,404
Tangible equity capital
21,881
18,567
Leverage ratio
28.7x
26.2x
337,667
268,936
Net leverage ratio
15.4x
14.5x
(1) See Note 8, Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2) Our definition for tangible equity capital limits the amount of junior subordinated notes and preferred stock included in the calculation to 25% of aggregate tangible equity capital. The amount excluded this period is approximately $117 million.
- 65 -
Included below are the changes in our tangible equity capital for the six months ended May 31, 2007 and year ended November 30, 2006:
Tangible Equity Capital
Beginning tangible equity capital
$18,567
$15,564
4,007
Dividends on common stock
(177
(276
Dividends on preferred stock
(66
Common stock open-market repurchases
(2,678
Common stock withheld from employees (1)
(172
(1,003
Equity-based award plans (2)
1,802
2,396
Net change in junior subordinated notes included in tangible equity (3)
1,666
712
Change in identifiable intangible assets and goodwill
(290
Other, net (4)
Ending tangible equity capital
$21,881
(1) Represents shares of common stock withheld in satisfaction of the exercise price of stock options and tax withholding obligations upon option exercises and conversion of RSUs.
(2) This represents the sum of (i) proceeds received from employees upon the exercise of stock options, (ii) the incremental tax benefits from the issuance of stock-based awards and (iii) the value of employee services received - as represented by the amortization of deferred stock compensation.
(3) Junior subordinated notes are deeply subordinated and have a long-term maturity and interest deferral features and are utilized in calculating equity capital by leading rating agencies.
(4) Other, net for 2007 includes a $67 million net increase to retained earnings from adoption of SFAS No. 157 and SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159). See Accounting and Regulatory Developments below for additional information. Other, net for 2006 includes a $6 million net decrease to retained earnings from the initial adoption of under SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments (SFAS 155) and SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets.
Primary Equity Double Leverage. Primary equity double leverage ratio is the comparison of equity investments in subsidiaries to total equity capital (the sum of total stockholders equity and junior subordinated notes). As of May 31, 2007, our equity investment in subsidiaries was $22.0 billion and our total equity capital computed to $25.5 billion. We aim to maintain a primary equity double leverage ratio (the ratio of equity investments in Holdings subsidiaries to its total equity capital) of 1.0x or below. Our primary equity double leverage ratio was 0.86x as of May 31, 2007 and 0.88x as of November 30, 2006. We believe total equity capital to be a more meaningful measure of our equity than stockholders equity because, as stated above, junior subordinated notes are equity-like due to their subordinated nature, long-term maturity and interest deferral features. We believe primary equity double leverage based on total equity capital to be a useful measure of our equity investments in subsidiaries. Our calculation of primary equity double leverage may not be comparable to other, similarly titled calculations by other companies as a result of different calculation methodologies.
Like other companies in the securities industry, we rely on external sources to finance a significant portion of our day-to-day operations. The cost and availability of unsecured financing are affected by our short-term and long-term credit ratings. Factors that may be significant to the determination of our credit ratings or otherwise affect our ability to raise short-term and long-term financing include our profit margin, our earnings trend and volatility, our cash liquidity and liquidity management, our capital structure, our risk level and risk management, our geographic and business diversification, and our relative positions in the markets in which we operate. Deterioration in any of these factors or combination of these factors may lead rating agencies to downgrade our credit ratings. This may increase the cost of, or possibly limit our access to, certain types of unsecured financings and trigger additional collateral requirements in derivative contracts and other secured funding arrangements. In addition, our debt ratings can affect certain capital markets revenues, particularly in those businesses where longer-term counterparty performance is
- 66 -
critical, such as over-the-counter (OTC) derivative transactions, including credit derivatives and interest rate swaps.
At May 31, 2007, the short- and long-term senior borrowings ratings of Holdings and LBI were as follows:
Credit Ratings
Short-term
Long-term
Standard & Poors Ratings Services
A-1
A+
A-1+
AA-
Moodys Investors Service
P-1
A1
Aa3
Fitch Ratings
F-1+
Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited
R-1 (middle)
A (high)
AA (low)
On June 28, 2007, Fitch Ratings upgraded Holdings long-term senior borrowing rating to AA-.
At May 31, 2007, counterparties had the right to require us to post additional collateral pursuant to derivative contracts and other secured funding arrangements of approximately $0.9 billion. Additionally, at that date we would have been required to post additional collateral pursuant to such arrangements of approximately $0.2 billion in the event we were to experience a downgrade of our senior debt rating of one notch and $2.7 billion in the event we were to experience a downgrade of our senior debt rating of two notches.
In the normal course of business, we enter into various lending-related commitments. In all instances, we mark to market these commitments with changes in fair value recognized in Principal transactions in the Consolidated Statement of Income. We use various hedging and funding strategies to actively manage our market, credit and liquidity exposures on these commitments. We do not believe total commitments are necessarily indicative of actual risk or funding requirements because the commitments may not be drawn or fully used and such amounts are reported before consideration of hedges. These commitments and any related drawdowns of these facilities typically have fixed maturity dates and are contingent on certain representations, warranties and contractual conditions applicable to the borrower.
Through our high grade (investment grade) and high yield (non-investment grade) sales, trading and underwriting activities, we make commitments to extend credit in loan syndication transactions. These commitments and any related drawdowns of these facilities typically have fixed maturity dates and are contingent on certain representations, warranties and contractual conditions applicable to the borrower. We define high yield exposures as securities of or loans to companies rated BB+ or lower or equivalent ratings by recognized credit rating agencies, as well as non-rated securities or loans that, in managements opinion, are non-investment grade.
We had commitments to investment grade borrowers at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006 of $19.6 billion (net credit exposure of $6.6 billion, after consideration of hedges) and $17.9 billion (net credit exposure of $4.9 billion, after consideration of hedges), respectively. We had commitments to non-investment grade borrowers of $10.7 billion (net credit exposure of $9.4 billion, after consideration of hedges) and $7.6 billion (net credit exposure of $5.9 billion, after consideration of hedges) at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively.
We provide contingent commitments to investment and non-investment grade counterparties related to acquisition financing. We do not believe contingent acquisition commitments are necessarily indicative of actual risk or funding requirements as funding is dependent both upon a proposed transaction being completed and the acquiror fully utilizing our commitment. Typically, these commitments are made to a potential acquiror in a proposed acquisition, which may or may not be completed depending on whether the potential acquiror to whom we have provided our commitment is successful. In addition, acquirors generally utilize multiple financing sources, including other investment and commercial banks, as well as accessing the general capital markets for completing transactions. Further, our past practice, consistent with our credit facilitation framework, has been to substantially distribute acquisition financings through loan syndications to investors prior to the acquisition funding. Therefore, our contingent acquisition commitments are generally significantly greater than the amounts we will ultimately fund. Additionally, the contingent borrowers ability to draw on the commitment is typically subject to there being no material adverse change in the borrowers financial conditions, among other factors. Commitments also generally contain certain flexible pricing features to adjust for changing market conditions prior to closing.
- 67 -
In addition, through our mortgage origination platforms we make commitments to extend mortgage loans. At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, we had outstanding mortgage commitments of approximately $15.4 billion and $12.2 billion, respectively, including $9.6 billion and $7.0 billion of residential mortgages and $5.8 billion and $5.2 billion of commercial mortgages. The residential mortgage loan commitments require us to originate mortgage loans at the option of a borrower generally within 90 days at fixed interest rates. We sell residential mortgage loans, once originated, primarily through securitizations.
In connection with our financing activities, we had outstanding commitments under certain collateralized lending arrangements of approximately $6.2 billion and $7.4 billion at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively. These commitments require borrowers to provide acceptable collateral, as defined in the agreements, when amounts are drawn under the lending facilities. Advances made under these lending arrangements typically are at variable interest rates and generally provide for over-collateralization. In addition, at May 31, 2007, we had commitments to enter into forward starting secured resale and repurchase agreements, primarily secured by government and government agency collateral, of $54.7 billion and $41.5 billion, respectively, compared to $44.4 billion and $31.2 billion, respectively, at November 30, 2006.
Lending-related commitments at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006 were as follows:
Total Contractual
Amount
(1) We view our net credit exposure for high grade commitments, after consideration of hedges, to be $6.6 billion and $4.9 billion at May 31, 2007, and November 30, 2006, respectively.
For additional information about lending-related commitments, see Note 8, Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In the normal course of business we engage in a variety of off-balance-sheet arrangements, including certain derivative contracts meeting the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN) No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45), definition of a guarantee that may require future payments. Other than lending-related commitments already discussed above in Lending-Related Commitments, the following table summarizes our off-balance-sheet arrangements at May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006 as follows:
- 68 -
Derivative contracts (1)
Municipal-securities-related
(1) We believe the fair value of these derivative contracts is a more relevant measure of the obligations because we believe the notional amount overstates the expected payout. At May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006, the fair value of these derivative contracts approximated $7.3 billion and $9.3 billion, respectively.
In accordance with FIN 45, the table above includes only certain derivative contracts meeting the FIN 45 definition of a guarantee. For additional information on these guarantees and other off-balance sheet arrangements, see Note 8 Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Derivatives
Neither derivatives notional amounts nor underlying instrument values are reflected as assets or liabilities in our Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition. Rather, the market, or fair values, related to derivative transactions are reported in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as assets or liabilities in Derivatives and other contractual agreements, as applicable. Derivatives are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis when a legal right of offset exists; on a net-by-cross product basis when applicable provisions are stated in a master netting agreement; and/or on a net of cash collateral received or paid on a counterparty basis, provided a legal right of offset exists.
We enter into derivative transactions both in a trading capacity and as an end-user. Acting in a trading capacity, we enter into derivative transactions to satisfy the needs of our clients and to manage our own exposure to market and credit risks resulting from our trading activities (collectively, Trading-Related Derivatives).
We conduct our derivative activities through a number of wholly-owned subsidiaries. Our fixed income derivative products business is principally conducted through our subsidiary Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc., and separately capitalized AAA rated subsidiaries, Lehman Brothers Financial Products Inc. and Lehman Brothers Derivative Products Inc. Our equity derivative products business is conducted through Lehman Brothers Finance S.A. and Lehman Brothers OTC Derivatives Inc. Our commodity and energy derivatives product business is conducted through Lehman Brothers Commodity Services Inc. In addition, as a global investment bank, we also are a market maker in a number of foreign currencies. Counterparties to our derivative product transactions primarily are U.S. and foreign banks, securities firms, corporations, governments and their agencies, finance companies, insurance companies, investment companies and pension funds. We manage the risks associated with derivatives on an aggregate basis, along with the risks associated with our non-derivative trading and market-making activities in cash instruments, as part of our firm wide risk management policies. We use industry standard derivative contracts whenever appropriate.
- 69 -
For additional information about our accounting policies and our Trading-Related Derivative activities, see Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 3, Financial Instruments and Other Inventory Positions to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
SPEs are corporations, trusts or partnerships that are established for a limited purpose. There are two types of SPEs qualified SPEs (QSPEs) and variable interest entities (VIEs).
Certain SPEs do not meet the QSPE criteria because their permitted activities are not sufficiently limited or because their assets are not qualifying financial instruments (e.g., real estate). These SPEs are referred to as VIEs, and we typically use them to create securities with a unique risk profile desired by investors to intermediate financial risk or to invest in real estate. Examples of our involvement with VIEs include collateralized debt obligations, synthetic credit transactions, real estate investments through VIEs, and other structured financing transactions. Under FIN 46(R), we consolidate a VIE if we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is the party that has a majority of the expected losses or a majority of the expected residual returns, or both, of the entity.
As a leading global investment bank, risk is an inherent part of our business. Global markets, by their nature, are prone to uncertainty and subject participants to a variety of risks. Risk management is considered to be of paramount importance in our day-to-day operations. Consequently, we devote significant resources (including investments in employees and technology) to the measurement, analysis and management of risk.
While risk cannot be eliminated, it can be mitigated to the greatest extent possible through a strong internal control environment. Essential in our approach to risk management is a strong internal control environment with multiple overlapping and reinforcing elements. We have developed policies and procedures to identify, measure, and monitor the risks involved in our global trading, brokerage and investment banking activities. We apply analytical procedures overlaid with sound practical judgment and work proactively with the business areas before transactions occur to ensure that appropriate risk mitigants are in place.
We also seek to reduce risk through the diversification of our businesses, counterparties and activities across geographic regions. We accomplish this objective by allocating the usage of capital to each of our businesses, establishing trading limits and setting credit limits for individual counterparties. Our focus is on balancing risks and returns. We seek to obtain adequate returns from each of our businesses commensurate with the risks they assume. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of our approach to managing risks can never be completely assured. For example, unexpected large or rapid movements or disruptions in one or more markets or other unforeseen developments could have an adverse effect on the results of our operations and on our financial condition. Those events could cause losses due to adverse changes in inventory values, decreases in the liquidity of trading positions, increases in our credit exposure to clients and counterparties, and increases in general systemic risk.
Our overall risk limits and risk management policies are established by managements Executive Committee. On a weekly basis, our Risk Committee, which consists of the Executive Committee, the Chief Risk Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, reviews all risk exposures, position concentrations and risk-taking activities. The Global Risk Management Division (the Division) is independent of the trading areas. The Division includes credit risk management, market risk management, quantitative risk management, sovereign risk management, investment management risk management and operational risk management. Combining these disciplines facilitates a fully integrated approach to risk management. The Division maintains staff in each of our regional trading centers as well as in key sales offices. Risk management personnel have multiple levels of daily contact with trading staff and
- 70 -
senior management at all levels within the Company. These interactions include reviews of trading positions and risk exposures.
Credit risk represents the possibility that a counterparty or an issuer of securities or other financial instruments we hold will be unable or unwilling to honor its contractual obligations to us. Credit risk management is therefore an integral component of our overall risk management framework. The Credit Risk Management Department (the CRM Department) has global responsibility for implementing our overall credit risk management framework.
The CRM Department manages the credit exposures related to trading activities by approving counterparties, assigning internal risk ratings, establishing credit limits and requiring master netting agreements and collateral in appropriate circumstances. The CRM Department considers the transaction size, the duration of a transaction and the potential credit exposure for complex derivative transactions in making our credit decisions. The CRM Department is responsible for the monitoring and review of counterparty risk ratings, current credit exposures and potential credit exposures across all products and recommending valuation adjustments, when appropriate. Credit limits are reviewed periodically to ensure that they remain appropriate in light of market events or the counterpartys financial condition.
Our Chief Risk Officer is a member of the Investment Banking Commitment, Investment, and Bridge Loan Approval Committees. Members of Credit and Market Risk Management participate in committee meetings, vetting and reviewing transactions. Decisions on approving transactions not only take into account the risks of the transaction on a stand-alone basis, but they also consider our aggregate obligor risk, portfolio concentrations, reputation risk and, importantly, the impact any particular transaction under consideration would have on our overall risk appetite. Exceptional transactions and/or situations are addressed and discussed with managements Executive Committee when appropriate.
Net Credit Exposure in Derivatives
With respect to OTC derivative contracts, we view our net credit exposure to be $19.4 billion at May 31, 2007, representing the fair value of OTC derivative contracts in a net receivable position after consideration of collateral.
The following table sets forth the fair value of OTC derivatives by contract type and related net credit exposure:
- 71 -
Fair Value of OTC Derivative Contracts by Maturity
Cross
Maturity,
Product
Less
Greater
and Cash
than 1
1 to 5
5 to 10
than 10
Collateral
OTC
Credit
Year
Years
Netting (1)
Exposure
Interest rate, currency
and credit default
swaps and options
$ 2,798
$ 8,448
$8,808
$10,251
$(19,367
$10,938
$ 10,249
Foreign exchange
forward contracts
contracts and
options
2,391
517
(1,378
Other fixed income
securities contracts(2)
5,067
50
437
(217
4,678
Equity contracts
5,391
822
1,676
(3,171
6,635
3,201
$15,647
$10,932
$9,691
$12,397
$(24,133
$24,534
$ 19,384
$ 2,100
$ 7,956
$6,874
$ 7,231
$(15,910
and options
2,670
925
(2,204
2,186
77
406
(208
5,557
3,959
1,236
1,901
(4,713
7,940
$12,513
$12,917
$8,447
$ 9,571
$(23,035
$20,413
(1) Cross-maturity netting represents the netting of receivable balances with payable balances for the same counterparty across maturity and product categories. Receivable and payable balances with the same counterparty in the same maturity category are netted within the maturity category when appropriate. Cash collateral received or paid is netted on a counterparty basis, provided legal right of offset exists. Assets and liabilities at May 31, 2007 were netted down for cash collateral of approximately $11.8 billion and $10.7 billion, respectively.
(2) Includes commodity derivatives assets of $477 million and liabilities of $490 million.
Presented below is an analysis of net credit exposure at May 31, 2007 for OTC contracts based on actual ratings made by external rating agencies or by equivalent ratings established and used by our CRM Department.
- 72 -
Counterparty
S&P/Moodys
than
Risk Rating
Equivalent
1 Year
10 Years
iAAA
AAA/Aaa
iAA
AA/Aa
iA
A/A
iBBB
BBB/Baa
iBB
BB/Ba
iB or lower
B/B1 or lower
Market risk represents the potential adverse change in the value of a portfolio of financial instruments due to changes in market rates, prices and volatilities. Market risk management is an essential component of our overall risk management framework. The Market Risk Management Department (the MRM Department) has global responsibility for developing and implementing our overall market risk management framework. To that end, it is responsible for developing the policies and procedures of the market risk management process, determining the market risk measurement methodology in conjunction with the Quantitative Risk Management Department (the QRM Department), monitoring, reporting and analyzing the aggregate market risk of trading exposures, administering market risk limits and the escalation process, and communicating large or unusual risks as appropriate. Market risks inherent in positions include, but are not limited to, interest rate, equity and foreign exchange exposures.
The MRM Department uses qualitative as well as quantitative information in managing trading risk, believing that a combination of the two approaches results in a more robust and complete approach to the management of trading risk. Quantitative information is derived from a variety of risk methodologies based on established statistical principles. To ensure high standards of analysis, the MRM Department has retained seasoned risk managers with the requisite experience and academic and professional credentials.
Market risk is present in both our long and short cash inventory positions (including derivatives), financing activities and contingent lending commitments. Our exposure to market risk varies in accordance with the volume of client-driven market-making transactions, the size of our proprietary trading and principal investment positions and the volatility of financial instruments traded. We seek to mitigate, whenever possible, excess market risk exposures through appropriate hedging strategies.
We participate globally in interest rate, equity, foreign exchange, commercial real estate and certain commodity markets. Our Fixed Income Capital Markets business has a broadly diversified market presence in U.S. and foreign government bond trading, emerging market securities, corporate debt (investment and non-investment grade), money market instruments, mortgages and mortgage- and asset-backed securities, real estate, municipal bonds, foreign exchange, commodity and credit derivatives. Our Equities Capital Markets business facilitates domestic and foreign trading in equity instruments, indices and related derivatives.
As a global investment bank, we incur interest rate risk in the normal course of business including, but not limited to, the following ways: we incur short-term interest rate risk in the course of facilitating the orderly flow of client transactions through the maintenance of government and other bond inventories. Market-making in corporate high-grade and high-yield instruments exposes us to additional risk due to potential variations in credit spreads. Trading in international markets exposes us to spread risk between the term structures of interest rates in different countries. Mortgages and mortgage-related securities are subject to prepayment risk. Trading in derivatives and structured products exposes us to changes in the volatility of interest rates. We actively manage interest rate risk through the use of interest rate futures, options, swaps, forwards and offsetting cash-market instruments. Inventory holdings, concentrations and aged positions are monitored closely.
We are a significant intermediary in the global equity markets through our market making in U.S. and nonU.S. equity securities and derivatives, including common stock, convertible debt, exchange-traded and OTC equity
- 73 -
options, equity swaps and warrants. These activities expose us to market risk as a result of equity price and volatility changes. Inventory holdings also are subject to market risk resulting from concentrations and changes in liquidity conditions that may adversely affect market valuations. Equity market risk is actively managed through the use of index futures, exchange-traded and OTC options, swaps and cash instruments.
We enter into foreign exchange transactions through our market-making activities, and are active in many foreign exchange markets. We are exposed to foreign exchange risk on our holdings of non-dollar assets and liabilities. We hedge our risk exposures primarily through the use of currency forwards, swaps, futures and options.
We are exposed to both physical and financial risk with respect to energy commodities, including electricity, oil and natural gas, through proprietary trading as well as from client-related trading activities. In addition, our structured products business offers investors structures on indices and customized commodity baskets, including energy, metals and agricultural markets. Risks are actively managed with exchange traded futures, swaps, OTC swaps and options. We also actively price and manage counterparty credit risk in the credit derivative swap markets.
Value-at-risk (VaR) is an estimate of the amount of mark-to-market loss that could be incurred, with a specified confidence level, over a given time period. The table below shows our end-of-day historical simulation VaR for our financial instrument inventory positions, estimated at a 95% confidence level over a one-day time horizon. This means that there is a 1-in-20 chance that daily trading net revenues losses on a particular day would exceed the reported VaR.
The historical simulation approach involves constructing a distribution of hypothetical daily changes in the value of our positions based on market risk factors embedded in the current portfolio and historical observations of daily changes in these factors. Our method uses four years of historical data weighted to give greater impact to more recent time periods in simulating potential changes in market risk factors. Because there is no uniform industry methodology for estimating VaR, different assumptions concerning the number of risk factors and the length of the time series of historical simulation of daily changes in these risk factors as well as different methodologies could produce materially different results and therefore caution should be used when comparing such risk measures across firms. We believe our methods and assumptions used in these calculations are reasonable and prudent.
It is implicit in a historical simulation VaR methodology that positions will have offsetting risk characteristics, referred to as diversification benefit. We measure the diversification benefit within our portfolio by historically simulating how the positions in our current portfolio would have behaved in relation to each other (as opposed to using a static estimate of a diversification benefit, which remains relatively constant from period to period). Thus, from time to time there will be changes in our historical simulation VaR due to changes in the diversification benefit across our portfolio of financial instruments.
VaR measures have inherent limitations including: historical market conditions and historical changes in market risk factors may not be accurate predictors of future market conditions or future market risk factors; VaR measurements are based on current positions, while future risk depends on future positions; VaR based on a one day measurement period does not fully capture the market risk of positions that cannot be liquidated or hedged within one day. VaR is not intended to capture worst case scenario losses and we could incur losses greater than the VaR amounts reported.
- 74 -
At
Average VaR Three MonthsEnded
Three MonthsEnded May 31,2007
Feb 28,2007
Nov 30,2006
High
Low
Interest rate risk
54
Equity price risk
Foreign exchange risk
Commodity risk
Diversification
benefit
(23
75
95
The increase in both the period end and quarterly average historical simulation VaR was due, in large part, from an increase in equity price risk, reflective of the growth in the Companys business activities across all business segments, as well as increases in principal trading and investing activities. Interest rate risk partially contributed to our increase in average historical simulation VaR for the 2007 three month period ending May 31, 2007. This is reflective of overall credit spread movements throughout the period.
As part of our risk management control processes, we monitor daily trading net revenues compared to reported historical simulation VaR as of the end of the prior business day. For the 2007 three month period ending May 31, 2007, there were no days when our daily net trading loss exceeded our historical simulation VaR as measured at the close of the previous business day.
We also use stress testing to evaluate risks associated with our real estate portfolios which are non-financial assets and therefore not captured in VaR. As of May 31, 2007, we had approximately $15.9 billion of real estate investments; however our net investment at risk was limited to $12.5 billion as a portion of these assets have been financed on a non-recourse basis. As of May 31, 2007, we estimate that a hypothetical 10% decline in the underlying property values associated with these investments would result in a net revenue loss of approximately $700 million.
Other Measures of Risk
We utilize a number of risk measurement methods and tools as part of our risk management process. One risk measure that we utilize is a comprehensive risk measurement framework that aggregates market event risk and counterparty risks. Market event risk measures the potential losses beyond those measured in market risk such as losses associated with a downgrade for high quality bonds, defaults of high yield bonds and loans, dividend risk for equity derivatives, deal break risk for merger arbitrage positions, defaults for mortgage loans and property value losses on real estate investments. Utilizing this broad risk measure, our average risk for the three months ended May 31, 2007 resulted in a comparative increase from the three months ended February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006. The comparative increases in this broad risk measure are largely attributable to growth in the Companys business activities across all business segments and general credit spread movements in the market during the period.
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the potential that we will be unable to:
· Meet our payment obligations when due;
· Borrow funds in the market on an on-going basis at an acceptable price to fund actual or proposed commitments; or
· Liquidate assets in a timely manner at a reasonable price.
Managements Finance Committee is responsible for developing, implementing and enforcing our liquidity, funding and capital policies. These policies include recommendations for capital and balance sheet size as well as the allocation of capital and balance sheet to the business units. Managements Finance Committee oversees compliance with policies and limits with the goal of ensuring we are not exposed to undue liquidity, funding or capital risk.
- 75 -
Our liquidity strategy seeks to ensure that we maintain sufficient liquidity to meet all of our funding obligations in all market environments. That strategy is centered on five principles:
· Maintaining a liquidity pool for Holdings that is of sufficient size to cover expected cash outflows for one year in a stressed liquidity environment.
· Relying on secured funding only to the extent that we believe it would be available in all market environments.
· Diversifying our funding sources to minimize reliance on any given providers.
· Assessing our liquidity at the legal entity level. For example, because our legal entity structure can constrain liquidity available to Holdings, our liquidity pool excludes liquidity that is restricted from availability to Holdings.
· Maintaining a comprehensive Funding Action Plan to manage a stress liquidity event, including a communication plan for regulators, creditors, investors and clients.
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems, or from external events. We face operational risk arising from mistakes made in the execution, confirmation or settlement of transactions or from transactions not being properly recorded, evaluated or accounted. Our businesses are highly dependent on our ability to process, on a daily basis, a large number of transactions across numerous and diverse markets in many currencies and these transactions have become increasingly complex. Consequently, we rely heavily on our financial, accounting and other data processing systems. In recent years, we have substantially upgraded and expanded the capabilities of our data processing systems and other operating technology, and we expect that we will need to continue to upgrade and expand in the future to avoid disruption of, or constraints on, our operations.
The Operational Risk Management Department (the ORM Department) is responsible for implementing and maintaining our overall global operational risk management framework, which seeks to minimize these risks through assessing, reporting, monitoring and mitigating operational risks.
We have a company-wide business continuity plan (the BCP Plan). The BCP Plan objective is to ensure that we can continue critical operations with limited processing interruption in the event of a business disruption. The BCP group manages our internal incident response process and develops and maintains continuity plans for critical business functions and infrastructure. This includes determining how vital business activities will be performed until normal processing capabilities can be restored. The BCP group is also responsible for facilitating disaster recovery and business continuity training and preparedness for our employees.
We recognize that maintaining our reputation among clients, investors, regulators and the general public is important. Maintaining our reputation depends on a large number of factors, including the selection of our clients and the conduct of our business activities. We seek to maintain our reputation by screening potential clients and by conducting our business activities in accordance with high ethical standards.
Potential clients are screened through a multi-step process that begins with the individual business units and product groups. In screening clients, these groups undertake a comprehensive review of the client and its background and the potential transaction to determine, among other things, whether they pose any risks to our reputation. Potential transactions are screened by independent committees in the Firm, which are composed of senior members from various corporate divisions of the Company including members of the Global Risk Management Division. These committees review the nature of the client and its business, the due diligence conducted by the business units and product groups and the proposed terms of the transaction to determine overall acceptability of the proposed transaction. In so doing, the committees evaluate the appropriateness of the transaction, including a consideration of ethical and social responsibility issues and the potential effect of the transaction on our reputation.
The overall effectiveness of our risk management practices can be evaluated on a broader perspective when analyzing the distribution of daily trading net revenues over time. We consider trading net revenue volatility over
- 76 -
time to be a comprehensive evaluator of our overall risk management practices because it incorporates the results of virtually all of our trading activities and types of risk including market, credit and event risks. Substantially all of the Companys positions are marked-to-market daily with changes recorded in net revenues. As discussed throughout this MD&A, we seek to reduce risk through the diversification of our businesses and a focus on client-flow activities along with selective proprietary and principal investing activities. This diversification and focus, combined with our risk management controls and processes, helps mitigate the net revenue volatility inherent in our trading activities.
The following table shows a measure of daily trading net revenue volatility, utilizing actual daily trading net revenues over the previous rolling 250 trading days at a 95% confidence level. This measure represents the loss relative to the median actual daily trading net revenues over the previous rolling 250 trading days, measured at a 95% confidence level. This means there is a 1-in-20 chance that actual daily trading net revenues would be expected to decline by an amount in excess of the reported revenue volatility measure.
Revenue Volatility
Revenue Volatility At
Average Revenue VolatilityThree Months Ended
(26
Average trading net revenue volatility measured in this manner was $37 million for the three months ended May 31, 2007, comparable to the three months ended February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006.
The following chart sets forth the frequency distribution for daily trading net revenues for our Capital Markets and Investment Management business segments (excluding asset management fees) for the three months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006:
- 77 -
Distribution of Daily Trading Net Revenues
For the three months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006, daily trading net revenues did not exceed losses of $25 million and $60 million, respectively, on any single day.
SFAS 159. In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159 which permits certain financial assets and financial liabilities to be measured at fair value, using an instrument-by-instrument election. The initial effect of adopting SFAS 159 must be accounted for as a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings for the fiscal year in which we apply SFAS 159. Retrospective application of SFAS 159 to fiscal years preceding the effective date is not permitted.
We elected to early adopt SFAS 159 beginning in our 2007 fiscal year and to measure at fair value substantially all structured notes not previously accounted for at fair value under SFAS 155, as well as certain deposits at our U.S. banking subsidiaries. We elected to adopt SFAS 159 for these instruments to reduce the complexity of accounting for these instruments under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. As a result of adopting SFAS 159, we recognized a $22 million after-tax increase ($35 million pre-tax) to opening retained earnings as of December 1, 2006, representing the effect of changing the measurement basis of these financial instruments from an adjusted amortized cost basis at November 30, 2006 to fair value.
SFAS 158 is effective for our fiscal year ending November 30, 2007. Had we adopted SFAS 158 at November 30, 2006, we would have recognized a pension asset of approximately $60 million for our funded pension plans and a liability of approximately $160 million for our unfunded pension and postretirement plans. Additionally, we would have reduced Accumulated other comprehensive income (net of tax) by approximately $380 million. At May 31, 2007 and due to changes in interest rates and favorable asset returns, the reduction to Accumulated other comprehensive income (net of tax) would be approximately $200 million. The actual impact of adopting SFAS 158
- 78 -
will depend on the fair value of plan assets and the amount of the benefit obligation measured as of November 30, 2007.
SFAS 157 also (i) nullifies the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 02-3, Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities (EITF 02-3) that precluded the recognition of a trading profit at the inception of a derivative contract, unless the fair value of such derivative was obtained from a quoted market price or other valuation technique incorporating observable inputs; (ii) clarifies that an issuers credit standing should be considered when measuring liabilities at fair value; (iii) precludes the use of a liquidity or block discount when measuring instruments traded in an active market at fair value; and (iv) requires costs related to acquiring financial instruments carried at fair value to be included in earnings as incurred.
We elected to early adopt SFAS 157 beginning in our 2007 fiscal year and we recorded the difference between the carrying amounts and fair values of (i) stand-alone derivatives and/or structured notes measured using the guidance in EITF 02-3 on recognition of a trading profit at the inception of a derivative; and (ii) financial instruments that are traded in active markets that were measured at fair value using block discounts, as a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings. As a result of adopting SFAS 157, we recognized a $45 million after-tax ($78 million pre-tax) increase to opening retained earnings. The effect of adopting SFAS 157 was not material to our Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information, see Note 4, Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
FIN 48. In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition threshold a tax position must meet to be recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. We must adopt FIN 48 as of the beginning of our 2008 fiscal year. We are evaluating the effect of adopting FIN 48 on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
SOP 07-1. In June 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position (SOP) No. 07-1, Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies(SOP 07-1). SOP 07-1 addresses when the accounting principles of the AICPA Audit and Accounting Guide Investment Companiesmust be applied by an entity and whether those accounting principles must be retained by a parent company in consolidation or by an investor in the application of the equity method of accounting. SOP 07-1 is effective for our fiscal year beginning December 1, 2008, with earlier application permitted as of December 1, 2007. We are evaluating the effect of adopting SOP 07-1 on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
FSP FIN 46(R)-7. In May 2007, the FASB directed the FASB Staff to issue FASB Staff Position No. FIN 46(R)-7, Application of FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) to Investment Companies (FSP FIN 46(R)-7). FSP FIN 46(R)-7 makes permanent the temporary deferral of the application of the provisions of FIN 46(R) to unregistered investment companies, and extends the scope exception from applying FIN 46(R) to include registered investment companies. FSP FIN 46(R)-7 is effective upon adoption of SOP 07-1. We are evaluating the effect of adopting FSP FIN 46(R)-7 on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
- 79 -
FSP FIN 39-1. In April 2007, the FASB directed the FASB Staff to issue FSP No. FIN 39-1, Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39 (FSP FIN 39-1). FSP FIN 39-1 modifies FIN No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts, and permits companies to offset cash collateral receivables or payables with net derivative positions under certain circumstances. FSP FIN 39-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted. FSP FIN 39-1 does not affect our Consolidated Financial Statements because it clarified the acceptability of existing market practice, which we use, of netting cash collateral against net derivative assets and liabilities.
Consolidated Supervised Entity. As of December 1, 2005, Holdings became regulated by the SEC as a CSE. Accordingly, Holdings is subject to group-wide supervision and examination by the SEC and, accordingly, we are subject to minimum capital requirements on a consolidated basis. This supervision imposes reporting (including reporting of a capital adequacy measurement consistent with the standards adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision) and notification requirements for the ultimate holding company. As of May 31, 2007, Holdings was in compliance with the CSE capital requirements and held allowable capital in excess of the minimum capital requirements on a consolidated basis.
As of December 1, 2005, LBI was approved by the SEC to calculate its net capital requirements using an alternative method for broker-dealers that are part of CSEs. The alternative method allows broker-dealers that are part of CSEs to apply internal risk models to calculate net capital charges for market and derivative-related credit risk. Under this rule, LBI is required to hold tentative net capital in excess of $1 billion and net capital in excess of $500 million. As of May 31, 2007, LBI had tentative net capital in excess of $6.6 billion, and had net capital of $4.1 billion, which exceeded the minimum net capital requirement by $3.6 billion.
Because our assets are, to a large extent, liquid in nature, they are not significantly affected by inflation. However, the rate of inflation affects such expenses as employee compensation, office space leasing costs and communications charges, which may not be readily recoverable in the prices of services we offer. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and has other adverse effects on the securities markets, it may adversely affect our consolidated financial condition and results of operations in certain businesses.
- 80 -
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The information under the caption Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsRisk Management in this Report is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Holdings (its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this Report.
Based on that evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this Report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Holdings in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Holdings in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Holdings, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
- 81 -
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
See Part I, Item 3, Legal Proceedings, in the Form 10-K and Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings, in Holdings Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2007 for a complete description of certain proceedings previously reported by us, including those listed below; only significant subsequent developments in such proceedings and new matters, if any, since the filing of the latest Form 10-Q are described below. Capitalized terms used in this Item that are defined in the Form 10-K have the meanings ascribed to them in the Form 10-K.
We are involved in a number of judicial, regulatory and arbitration proceedings concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of our business. Such proceedings include actions brought against us and others with respect to transactions in which we acted as an underwriter or financial advisor, actions arising out of our activities as a broker or dealer in securities and commodities and actions brought on behalf of various classes of claimants against many securities and commodities firms, including us.
Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome, we generally have denied, or believe we have a meritorious defense and will deny, liability in all significant cases pending against us, including the matters described below and in the Form 10-K and subsequent Form 10-Q, and we intend to defend vigorously each such case. Based on information currently available, we believe the amount, or range, of reasonably possible losses in connection with the actions against us, including the matters described below and in the Form 10-K and subsequent Form 10-Q, in excess of established reserves, in the aggregate, not to be material to the Companys consolidated financial condition or cash flows. However, losses may be material to our operating results for any particular future period, depending on the level of our income for such period.
Bader v. Ainslie, et al. (reported in the Form 10-K and our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2007):
On April 7, 2007, the New York District Court entered an order finally approving the settlement and dismissing the case.
Securities Action. On June 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied plaintiffs petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc of the Second Circuits December 2006 decision denying class certification in certain focus cases and returned the case to the New York District Court.
Antitrust Action. On June 18, 2007, the United States Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuits decision, ruling that the antitrust claims were implicitly precluded by the securities laws, and dismissed the claims.
Options Backdating Derivative Cases
Beginning in mid-April 2007, three purported shareholder derivative actions were filed against Holdings (as a nominal defendant) and certain of its current and former officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The cases were captioned: Garber v. Fuld, et al.; Staehr v. Fuld, et al.; and Locals 302 & 612 of the International Union of Operating Engineers-Employers Construction Industry Retirement Trust v. Fuld, et al. These complaints purport to bring state law claims for breach of fiduciary duty, gross mismanagement, misappropriation and/or waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment, and two of the complaints assert claims under federal law as well, including Sections 10(b) and 14(a) of the Exchange Act and the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. The complaints all make similar allegations that stock options granted by Holdings between 1995 and 2002 were backdated and/or spring-loaded and were issued in violation of Holdings stock option plan. The complaints further allege that Holdings financial statements for the years 1995 through the present misstated Holdings financial results by failing to properly report compensation expense and tax liabilities attributable to stock options granted between 1995 and 2002. The complaints seek damages from the individual defendants, various types of equitable and injunctive relief, including rescission of all unexercised stock options granted in the time frame, return of certain incentive-based or equity-based compensation and imposition of a constructive trust and attachment of assets, and certain corporate governance reforms.
- 82 -
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, in the Form 10-K.
- 83 -
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The table below sets forth information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf of Holdings or any affiliated purchaser (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act) of our common stock during the quarter ended May 31, 2007.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Total Number of
Maximum Number
Shares Purchased
of Shares that May
as Part of Publicly
Yet Be Purchased
of Shares
Average Price
Announced Plans
Under the Plans or
Purchased
Paid per Share
or Programs
Programs
Month # 1 (March 1 - March 31, 2007):
Common stock repurchases 1
3,082,800
Employee transactions 2
191,371
3,274,171
$73.71
75,750,556
Month # 2 (April 1 - April 30, 2007):
2,507,000
122,003
2,629,003
$73.39
73,121,553
Month # 3 (May 1 - May 31, 2007):
865,800
432,031
1,297,831
$75.03
71,823,722
Total, March 1, 2007 - May 31, 2007:
6,455,600
745,405
7,201,005
$73.83
(1) We have an ongoing common stock repurchase program, pursuant to which we repurchase shares in the open market. As previously announced, in January 2007 our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase, subject to market conditions, of up to 100 million shares of Holdings common stock, for the management of the Firms equity capital, including offsetting dilution due to employee stock awards. This authorization superseded the stock repurchase program authorized in January 2006. The number of shares authorized to be repurchased in the open market is reduced by the actual number of Employee Offset Shares (as defined below) received.
(2) Represents shares of common stock withheld in satisfaction of the exercise price of stock options and tax withholding obligations upon option exercises and conversion of restricted stock units (collectively, Employee Offset Shares).
For more information about the repurchase program and employee stock plans, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsLiquidity, Funding and Capital ResourcesEquity Management in Part I, Item 2, and Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1, in this Report, and Notes 12 and 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8, and Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in Part III, Item 12, of the Form 10-K.
On March 7, 2007, we issued 584,303 shares of our common stock (the Shares) in connection with our acquisition of privately held Grange Securities Limited (Grange), a full service Australian broker dealer specializing in fixed income products. The Shares were issued as partial consideration to Granges stockholders for 100% of the outstanding equity interest in Grange. The Shares were valued at approximately AU$56 million ($44 million), based on the average closing prices per share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange in the five trading days that preceded March 2, 2007 and converted into Australian dollars based on March 2, 2007 exchange rates.
In accordance with the terms of a share sale agreement, dated March 7, 2007 among Holdings, Lehman Brothers Australia Granica Pty Limited and the Grange stockholders named therein, the Shares were issued pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and were not offered or sold within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, any U.S. persons. The former Grange stockholders have no rights to require us to register the Shares under the Securities Act. Additionally, the former Grange stockholders have, subject to certain exceptions, agreed not to transfer the Shares for a period of three years, and in certain cases have pledged the shares to us to secure their obligations to repay certain amounts owed by them to Grange.
- 84 -
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Holdings was held on April 12, 2007.
The stockholders voted on proposals to:
1. Elect all ten Directors for one-year terms;
2. Ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm for the 2007 fiscal year;
3. Approve an amendment to the Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan increasing the number of shares of common stock available for awards; and
4. Consider a stockholder proposal related to political contributions made by the Company.
All nominees for election to the board were elected to serve until the Annual Meeting in 2008, and until their respective successors are elected and qualified.
The stockholders also ratified the selection of the independent auditors by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and adopted the amendment to the Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.
The stockholder proposal was not adopted.
The number of votes cast for and against, and the number of abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to each proposal is set forth below:
Broker
Proposal
For
Against
Abstain
Non-Votes
Election of Directors
Michael L. Ainslie
494,080,684
7,757,645
4,343,517
*
John F. Akers
476,845,111
24,915,682
4,421,053
Roger S. Berlind
493,193,766
8,143,455
4,844,625
Thomas H. Cruikshank
493,278,407
8,201,573
4,701,866
Marsha Johnson Evans
482,755,733
19,512,481
3,913,632
Richard S. Fuld, Jr.
496,419,703
6,160,493
3,601,650
Sir Christopher Gent
482,788,826
19,534,057
3,858,963
Roland A. Hernandez
500,479,111
1,708,392
3,994,343
Henry Kaufman
495,123,051
6,719,328
4,339,467
John D. Macomber
477,100,381
24,713,443
4,368,022
Ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the independent registered public accounting firm
495,324,450
7,394,408
3,462,988
Adoption of the amendment to the Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
266,170,748
179,937,519
4,906,889
55,166,690
Adoption of the stockholder proposal
19,226,108
384,158,756
47,630,292
* Not applicable
- 85 -
ITEM 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as part of (or are furnished with, as indicated below) this Quarterly Report or, where indicated, were heretofore filed and are hereby incorporated by reference:
3.01
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant dated October 10, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.04 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2006)
3.02
By-Laws of the Registrant, amended as of December 21, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 27, 2006)
3.03
Certificate of Designations with respect to the Registrants Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series H (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 23, 2007)
3.04
Certificate of Designations with respect to the Registrants Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.02 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 23, 2007)
11.01
Computation of Per Share Earnings (omitted in accordance with section (b)(11) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K; the computation of per share earnings is set forth in Part I, Item 1, in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Earnings Per Common Share and Stockholders Equity))
12.01*
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
15.01*
Letter of Ernst & Young LLP regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information
31.01*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
31.02*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
32.01*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.)
32.02*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (This certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed with the SEC for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.)
* Filed/furnished herewith
- 86 -
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant)
Date: July 10, 2007
By:
/s/ Christopher M. OMeara
Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Executive Vice President (principal financial and accounting officer)
- 87 -
Exhibit No.
Exhibit
12.01
15.01
31.01
31.02
32.01
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.02
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
- 88 -