UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒
Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017
or
☐
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to
96 South George Street, Suite 520
York, Pennsylvania 17401
(Address of principal executive offices)
(717) 225-4711
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Commission file
number
Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter
IRS Employer
Identification No.
State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization
1-03560
P. H. Glatfelter Company
23-0628360
Pennsylvania
N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a small reporting company or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ☐ No ☒.
Common Stock outstanding on October 25, 2017 totaled 43,586,355 shares.
P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
September 30, 2017
Table of Contents
Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1
Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)
2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)
3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (unaudited)
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (unaudited)
5
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
6
1.
Organization
2.
Accounting Policies
3.
Earnings Per Share
7
4.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
8
5.
Income Taxes
10
6.
Stock-based Compensation
7.
Retirement Plans and Other Post- Retirement Benefits
11
8.
Inventories
12
9.
Capitalized Interest
10.
Long-term Debt
11.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
13
12.
Financial Derivatives and Hedging Activities
13.
Commitments, Contingencies and Legal Proceedings
15
14.
Segment Information
18
15.
Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
19
Item 2
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
24
Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks
34
Item 4
Controls and Procedures
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
35
Item 6
Exhibits
SIGNATURES
PART I
Item 1 – Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited)
Three months ended
September 30
Nine months ended
In thousands, except per share
2017
2016
Net sales
$
413,325
405,301
1,191,380
1,213,932
Energy and related sales, net
1,236
1,346
3,346
4,013
Total revenues
414,561
406,647
1,194,726
1,217,945
Costs of products sold
359,826
345,477
1,052,626
1,056,209
Gross profit
54,735
61,170
142,100
161,736
Selling, general and administrative expenses
33,399
35,747
100,484
104,796
(Gains) losses on dispositions of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
(24
)
(50
31
Operating income
21,360
25,418
41,666
56,909
Non-operating income (expense)
Interest expense
(4,547
(3,895
(13,031
(11,964
Interest income
51
52
209
204
Other, net
(478
(573
(906
(956
Total non-operating expense
(4,974
(4,416
(13,728
(12,716
Income before income taxes
16,386
21,002
27,938
44,193
Income tax provision
4,281
1,401
9,944
6,459
Net income
12,105
19,601
17,994
37,734
Earnings per share
Basic
0.28
0.45
0.41
0.87
Diluted
0.27
0.44
0.86
Cash dividends declared per common share
0.13
0.125
0.39
0.375
Weighted average shares outstanding
43,617
43,576
43,601
43,552
44,182
44,133
44,410
44,059
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
- 2 -
GLATFELTER
09.30.17 Form 10-Q
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
In thousands
Foreign currency translation adjustments
16,559
(1,530
50,128
(2,975
Net change in:
Deferred (gains) losses on cash flow hedges, net of taxes
of $111, $289, $2,031 and $88, respectively
(1,514
(858
(6,111
152
Unrecognized retirement obligations, net of taxes
of $(1,340), $(1,405), $(4,018) and $(4,214), respectively
2,285
2,319
6,838
6,957
Other comprehensive income (loss)
17,330
(69
50,855
4,134
Comprehensive income
29,435
19,532
68,849
41,868
- 3 -
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
84,287
55,444
Accounts receivable, net
186,310
152,989
256,764
249,669
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
44,134
36,157
Total current assets
571,495
494,259
Plant, equipment and timberlands, net
856,017
775,898
Goodwill
81,497
73,094
Intangible assets, net
59,199
56,259
Other assets
128,586
121,749
Total assets
1,696,794
1,521,259
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Current portion of long-term debt
11,122
8,961
Accounts payable
168,848
164,345
Dividends payable
5,675
5,455
Environmental liabilities
20,000
25,000
Other current liabilities
130,368
119,250
Total current liabilities
336,013
323,011
Long-term debt
459,025
363,647
Deferred income taxes
65,597
54,995
Other long-term liabilities
125,563
125,780
Total liabilities
986,198
867,433
Commitments and contingencies
—
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock
544
Capital in excess of par value
62,346
57,917
Retained earnings
963,853
962,884
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(153,751
(204,606
872,992
816,739
Less cost of common stock in treasury
(162,396
(162,913
Total shareholders’ equity
710,596
653,826
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
- 4 -
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
56,343
49,725
Amortization of debt issue costs
868
864
Pension expense, net of unfunded benefits paid
3,707
2,908
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
4,282
(4,266
Share-based compensation
4,868
4,218
Change in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable
(23,753
(12,927
2,906
(17,897
Prepaid and other current assets
(7,185
(4,205
(4,001
(9,662
Accruals and other current liabilities
(3,702
10,257
Other
519
2,657
Net cash provided by operating activities
52,796
59,437
Investing activities
Expenditures for purchases of plant, equipment and timberlands
(102,172
(116,948
Proceeds from disposals of plant, equipment and timberlands, net
217
55
(100
(400
Net cash used by investing activities
(102,055
(117,293
Financing activities
Repayments of note offerings
(136
Net borrowings (repayments) under revolving credit facility
96,534
(642
Proceeds from term loans
19,428
Repayment of term loans
(6,947
(3,803
Payments of dividends
(16,805
(16,134
Proceeds from government grants
5,251
Payments related to share-based compensation awards and other
(128
(990
Net cash provided by financing activities
72,654
2,974
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
5,448
330
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
28,843
(54,552
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
105,304
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period
50,752
Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid for:
Interest, net of amounts capitalized
8,719
7,376
Income taxes, net
7,567
11,609
- 5 -
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ORGANIZATION
P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries (“Glatfelter”) is a manufacturer of specialty papers and fiber-based engineered materials. Headquartered in York, PA, U.S. operations include facilities in Spring Grove, PA and Chillicothe and Fremont, OH. International operations include facilities in Canada, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the Philippines, and sales and distribution offices in Russia and China. The terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company,” or “Glatfelter,” refer to P. H. Glatfelter Company and subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise. Our products are marketed worldwide, either through wholesale paper merchants, brokers and agents, or directly to customers.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (“financial statements”) include the accounts of Glatfelter and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
We prepared these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“generally accepted accounting principles” or “GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to interim financial statements. In our opinion, the financial statements reflect all normal, recurring adjustments needed to present fairly our results for the interim periods. When preparing these financial statements, we have assumed that you have read the audited consolidated financial statements included in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Accounting Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingencies as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management believes the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of these financial statements are reasonable, based upon currently available facts and known circumstances, but recognizes that actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting designed to simplify certain aspects of accounting for share-
based awards. The new ASU requires entities to recognize as a component of income tax expense all excess tax benefits or deficiencies arising from the difference between compensation costs recognized and the intrinsic value at the time an option is exercised or, in the case of restricted stock and similar awards, the fair value upon vesting of an award. Previously such differences were recognized in additional paid in capital as part of an “APIC pool.” The ASU also requires entities to exclude excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies from the calculation of common share equivalents for purposes of calculating earnings per share. In addition, as permitted by the ASU, we have elected to account for the impact of forfeitures as they occur rather to estimate forfeitures for purposes of recognizing compensation expense. We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2017, on a prospective basis; however, the adoption of the new standard did not have a material impact on our reported results of operations or financial position.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers which clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard for GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The new standard is required to be adopted retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The ASU requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. The guidance allows for both retrospective and modified retrospective methods of adoption. We will apply the modified retrospective method of adoption. We continue to perform our assessment of the impact of the ASU on our policies, processes, systems and controls and are developing processes to obtain the information necessary for the new disclosures. This assessment requires, among others, a review of a substantial amount of the contracts we have with our customers.
Substantially all of our revenue is earned pursuant to contracts under which we have one performance obligation that is satisfied at a point-in-time. We have completed our review of a substantial portion of our contracts and we do not expect this ASU will have a significant impact on the timing or amount of revenue recognition, our results of operations or our financial position.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost (“ASU 2017-07”). The update requires entities to present the service cost component of the net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. All other components are to be presented below the determination of
- 6 -
operating income. Entities will be required to disclose the line(s) used to present the other components of net periodic benefit cost, if the components are not presented separately in the income statement. ASU 2017-07 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-07 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This ASU will require organizations such as us that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. The new guidance will be effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of assessing the impact this standard will have on us and expect to follow a modified retrospective method provided for under the standard.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities" (“ASU 2017-12”), which simplifies the application of hedge accounting and more closely aligns hedge accounting with an entity’s risk management strategies. ASU 2017-12 also amends the manner in which hedge effectiveness may be performed and changes the presentation of hedge ineffectiveness in the financial statements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for us beginning January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. ASU 2017-12 requires a cumulative-effect adjustment for certain items upon adoption. We are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2017-12 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments that changes the impairment model for most financial instruments, including trade receivables from an incurred loss method to a new forward-looking approach, based on expected losses. Under the new guidance, an allowance is recognized based on an estimate of expected credit losses. This standard is effective for us in the first quarter of 2020 and must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition approach. We are currently assessing the impact this standard may have on our results of operations and financial position.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the details of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”):
Weighted average common shares
outstanding used in basic EPS
Common shares issuable upon
exercise of dilutive stock options
and PSAs / RSUs
565
557
outstanding and common share
equivalents used in diluted EPS
809
507
The following table sets forth potential common shares outstanding that were not included in the computation of diluted EPS for the period indicated, because their effect would be anti-dilutive:
967
681
593
683
- 7 -
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The following table sets forth details of the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (losses) for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.
Currency translation adjustments
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges
Change in pensions
Change in other postretirement defined benefit plans
Total
Balance at July 1, 2017
(66,879
(3,097
(105,824
4,719
(171,081
Other comprehensive income
before reclassifications (net of tax)
(1,533
15,026
Amounts reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive income (net of tax)
2,424
(139
2,304
Net current period other comprehensive
income (loss)
Balance at September 30, 2017
(50,320
(4,611
(103,400
4,580
Balance at July 1, 2016
(74,486
785
(115,786
3,204
(186,283
(1,195
(2,725
337
2,464
(145
2,656
Balance at September 30, 2016
(76,016
(73
(113,322
3,059
(186,352
Balance at January 1, 2017
(100,448
1,500
(110,656
4,998
(4,868
1
45,261
(1,243
7,256
(419
5,594
(418
Balance at January 1, 2016
(73,041
(225
(120,714
3,494
(190,486
(106
(3,081
258
7,392
(435
7,215
- 8 -
Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:
Three months ended September 30
Description
Line Item in Statements of Income
Cash flow hedges (Note 12)
(Gains) losses on cash flow hedges
29
347
(1,687
264
Tax expense (benefit)
(10
444
(6
Net of tax
Retirement plan obligations (Note 7)
Amortization of deferred benefit pension plans
Prior service costs
532
506
1,592
1,519
176
168
528
504
Selling, general and administrative
Actuarial losses
2,290
2,450
6,852
7,350
788
843
2,359
2,530
3,786
3,967
11,331
11,903
Tax benefit
(1,362
(1,503
(4,075
(4,511
Amortization of deferred benefit other plans
(37
(112
(8
(77
(156
(233
(467
(17
(33
(234
(703
Tax expense
89
268
Total reclassifications, net of tax
- 9 -
5.INCOME TAXES
Income taxes are recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements or tax returns. The effects of income taxes are measured based on enacted tax laws and rates.
As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had $17.1 million and $14.2 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits. As of September 30, 2017, if such benefits were to be recognized, approximately $11.5 million would be recorded as a component of income tax expense, thereby affecting our effective tax rate.
We, or one of our subsidiaries, file income tax returns with the United States Internal Revenue Service, as well as various state and foreign authorities.
The following table summarizes, by major jurisdiction, tax years that remain subject to examination:
Open Tax Years
Jurisdiction
Examinations not yet initiated
Examination in progress
United States
Federal
2014 - 2016
State
2012 - 2016
2013 -2014
Canada(1)
2010-2013; 2016
2014 - 2015
Germany(1)
2012 - 2015
France
2011 - 2012
United Kingdom
2015 - 2016
Philippines
2015 -2016
(1)
includes provincial or similar local jurisdictions, as applicable
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, which often result in proposed assessments. Management performs a comprehensive review of its global tax positions on a quarterly basis and accrues amounts for uncertain tax positions. Based on these reviews and the result of discussions and resolutions of matters with certain tax authorities and the closure of tax years subject to tax audit, reserves are adjusted as necessary. However, future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities in the period the assessments are determined or resolved or as such statutes are closed. Due to potential for resolution of federal, state and foreign examinations, and the lapse of various statutes of limitation, it is reasonably possible our gross unrecognized tax benefits balance may decrease within the next twelve months by a range of zero to $0.7 million. Substantially all of this range relates to tax positions taken in the United Kingdom and the U.S.
We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as income tax expense. The following table summarizes information related to interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions:
In millions
Interest expense (income)
0.3
0.2
Penalties
Accrued interest payable
0.8
0.5
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The P. H. Glatfelter Amended and Restated Long Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) provides for the issuance of Glatfelter common stock to eligible participants in the form of restricted stock units, restricted stock awards, non-qualified stock options, performance shares, incentive stock options and performance units.
Pursuant to terms of the LTIP, we have issued to eligible participants restricted stock units, performance share awards and stock only stock appreciation rights.
Restricted Stock Units (“RSU”) and Performance Share Awards (“PSAs”) Awards of RSUs and PSAs are made under our LTIP. On May 4, 2017, our shareholders approved a 1,840,000 share increase in the shares available to be awarded under the LTIP. The RSUs vest on the passage of time, generally on a graded scale over a three, four, and five-year period, or in certain instances the RSUs were issued with five year cliff vesting. PSAs are issued to members of management and vesting is based on achievement of cumulative financial performance targets covering a two year period followed by an additional one-year service period. The performance measures include a minimum, target and maximum performance level providing the grantees an opportunity to receive more or less shares than targeted depending on actual financial performance. For both RSUs and PSAs, the grant date fair value of the awards, which is equal to the closing price per common share on the date of the award, is used to determine the amount of expense to be recognized over the applicable service period. Settlement of RSUs and PSAs will be made in shares of our common stock currently held in treasury.
- 10 -
The following table summarizes RSU and PSA activity during periods indicated:
Units
Balance at January 1,
679,038
674,523
Granted
370,458
298,832
Forfeited
(93,045
(146,327
Shares delivered
(26,352
(149,975
Balance at September 30,
930,099
677,053
The amount granted in 2017 and 2016 includes PSAs of 163,274 and 199,693, respectively, exclusive of reinvested dividends.
The following table sets forth aggregate RSU and PSA compensation expense for the periods indicated:
1,658
765
3,746
2,167
Stock Only Stock Appreciation Rights (“SOSARs”) Under terms of the SOSAR, a recipient receives the right to a payment in the form of shares of common stock equal to the difference, if any, in the fair market value of one share of common stock at the time of exercising the SOSAR and the exercise price. The SOSARs vest ratably over a three year period and have a term of ten years.
No SOSARs were granted in 2017. The following table sets forth information related to outstanding SOSARS for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016;
SOSARS
Shares
Wtd Avg
Exercise
Price
Outstanding at January 1,
2,736,616
17.64
2,199,742
17.82
743,925
17.54
Exercised
(33,050
14.65
(61,190
10.70
Canceled / forfeited
(17,630
18.46
(143,932
17.87
Outstanding at September 30,
2,685,936
17.67
2,738,545
SOSAR Grants
Weighted average grant date
fair value per share
-
4.07
Aggregate grant date
fair value (in thousands)
3,013
Black-Scholes assumptions
Dividend yield
2.85
%
Risk free rate of return
1.34
Volatility
31.97
Expected life
6 yrs
The following table sets forth SOSAR compensation expense for the periods indicated:
254
650
1,122
2,051
RETIREMENT PLANS AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The following tables provide information with respect to the net periodic costs of our pension and post-retirement medical benefit plans.
Pension Benefits
Service cost
2,695
2,614
Interest cost
5,929
6,120
Expected return on plan assets
(10,749
(11,331
Amortization of prior service
cost
708
674
Amortization of unrecognized
loss
3,078
3,293
Total net periodic benefit cost
1,661
1,370
Other Benefits
289
287
499
498
Amortization of prior
service credit
(45
Amortization of
actuarial gain
(94
(189
Total net periodic
benefit cost
649
551
8,065
7,855
17,825
18,360
(32,246
(33,992
2,120
2,023
9,211
9,880
4,975
4,126
860
1,497
1,494
(283
(567
1,946
1,651
- 11 -
INVENTORIES
Inventories, net of reserves, were as follows:
Raw materials
64,088
66,359
In-process and finished
117,490
112,507
Supplies
75,186
70,803
CAPITALIZED INTEREST
The following table sets forth details of interest incurred, capitalized and expensed:
Interest cost incurred
5,079
4,334
14,556
12,962
Interest capitalized
439
1,525
998
4,547
3,895
13,031
11,964
Capitalized interest primarily relates to spending for Specialty Papers’ environmental compliance and the Airlaid capacity expansion projects.
LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt is summarized as follows:
Revolving credit facility, due Mar. 2020
158,298
61,595
5.375% Notes, due Oct. 2020
250,000
2.40% Term Loan, due Jun. 2022
8,012
8,282
2.05% Term Loan, due Mar. 2023
34,659
35,163
1.30% Term Loan, due Jun. 2023
9,698
9,788
1.55% Term Loan, due Sep. 2025
11,574
10,333
Total long-term debt
472,241
375,161
Less current portion
(11,122
(8,961
Unamortized deferred issuance costs
(2,094
(2,553
Long-term debt, net of current portion
On March 12, 2015, we amended our revolving credit agreement with a consortium of banks (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) which increased the amount available for borrowing to $400 million, extended the maturity of the facility to March 12, 2020, and instituted a revised interest rate pricing grid. On February 1, 2017, the Revolving Credit Facility was further amended to, among other things, change the definition of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) for purposes of calculating covenant compliance.
For all US dollar denominated borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility, the borrowing rate is, at our option, either, (a) the bank’s base rate which is equal to the greater of i) the prime rate; ii) the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points; or iii) the daily Euro-rate plus 100 basis points plus an applicable spread over either i), ii) or iii) ranging from 12.5 basis points to 100 basis points based on the Company’s leverage ratio and its corporate credit ratings determined by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services and Moody’s Investor Service, Inc. (the “Corporate Credit Rating”); or (b) the daily Euro-rate plus an applicable margin ranging from 112.5 basis points to 200 basis points based on the Company’s leverage ratio and the Corporate Credit Rating. For non-US dollar denominated borrowings, interest is based on (b) above.
The Revolving Credit Facility contains a number of customary covenants for financings of this type that, among other things, restrict our ability to dispose of or create liens on assets, incur additional indebtedness, repay other indebtedness, limits certain intercompany financing arrangements, make acquisitions and engage in mergers or consolidations. We are also required to comply with specified financial tests and ratios including: i) maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio (the “leverage ratio”); and ii) a consolidated EBITDA to interest expense ratio. The most restrictive of our covenants is a maximum leverage ratio of 3.5x. As of September 30, 2017, the leverage ratio, as calculated in accordance with the definition in our amended credit agreement, was 2.6x. A breach of these requirements would give rise to certain remedies under the Revolving Credit Facility, among which are the termination of the agreement and accelerated repayment of the outstanding borrowings plus accrued and unpaid interest under the credit facility.
On October 3, 2012, we completed a private placement offering of $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “5.375% Notes”). The 5.375% Notes, which are now publically registered, are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, by PHG Tea Leaves, Inc., Mollanvick, Inc., Glatfelter Composite Fibers N. A., Inc., Glatfelter Advanced Materials N.A., LLC., and Glatfelter Holdings, LLC (the “Guarantors”). Interest on the 5.375% Notes is payable semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15.
The 5.375% Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time at the redemption prices specified in the applicable Indenture. These Notes and the guarantees of the notes are senior obligations of the Company and the Guarantors, respectively, rank equally in right of payment with future senior indebtedness of the Company and the Guarantors and will mature on October 15, 2020.
The 5.375% Notes contain various covenants customary to indebtedness of this nature including limitations on i) the amount of indebtedness that may be incurred; ii) certain restricted payments including common stock dividends; iii)
- 12 -
distributions from certain subsidiaries; iv) sales of assets; v) transactions amongst subsidiaries; and vi) incurrence of liens on assets. In addition, the 5.375% Notes contain cross default provisions that could result in all such notes becoming due and payable in the event of a failure to repay debt outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility at maturity or a default under the Revolving Credit Facility that accelerates the debt outstanding thereunder. As of September 30, 2017, we met all of the requirements of our debt covenants.
Glatfelter Gernsbach GmbH & Co. KG (“Gernsbach”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours, entered into a series of borrowing agreements with IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG, Düsseldorf (“IKB”) as summarized below:
Amounts in thousands
Original
Principal
Interest
Rate
Maturity
Borrowing date
Apr. 11, 2013
€
42,700
2.05
Mar. 2023
Sep. 4, 2014
10,000
2.40
Jun. 2022
Oct. 10, 2015
2,608
1.55
Sep. 2025
May 4, 2016
7,195
Apr. 26, 2016
1.30
Jun. 2023
Each of the borrowings require quarterly repayments of principal and interest and provide for representations, warranties and covenants customary for financings of these types. The financial covenants contained in each of the IKB loans, which relate to the minimum ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense and the maximum ratio of consolidated total net debt to consolidated adjusted EBITDA, are calculated by reference to our Revolving Credit Facility.
P. H. Glatfelter Company guarantees all debt obligations of its subsidiaries. All such obligations are recorded in these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Letters of credit issued to us by certain financial institutions totaled $5.2 million as of September 30, 2017 and $5.1 million as of December 31, 2016. The letters of credit, which amounts available under our revolving credit facility, primarily provide financial assurances for the benefit of certain state workers compensation insurance agencies in conjunction with our self-insurance program. We bear the credit risk on this amount to the extent that we do not comply with the provisions of certain agreements. No amounts are outstanding under the letters of credit.
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The amounts reported on the condensed consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value. The following table sets forth carrying value and fair value of long-term debt:
December 31, 2016
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
Variable rate debt
Fixed-rate bonds
254,265
256,563
2.40% Term loan
8,207
8,877
2.05% Term loan
35,223
37,089
1.30% Term Loan
9,644
10,062
1.55% Term loan
11,509
10,082
477,146
384,268
As of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, we had $250.0 million of 5.375% fixed rate bonds. These bonds are publicly registered, but thinly traded. Accordingly, the values set forth above for the bonds, as well as our other debt instruments, are based on observable inputs and other relevant market data (Level 2). The fair value of financial derivatives is set forth below in Note 12.
FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
As part of our overall risk management practices, we enter into financial derivatives primarily designed to either i) hedge foreign currency risks associated with forecasted transactions – “cash flow hedges”; or ii) mitigate the impact that changes in currency exchange rates have on intercompany financing transactions and foreign currency denominated receivables and payables – “foreign currency hedges."
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments - Cash Flow Hedges We use currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges to manage our exposure to fluctuations in the currency exchange rates on certain forecasted production costs or capital expenditures expected to be incurred. Currency forward contracts involve fixing the exchange for delivery of a specified amount of foreign currency on a specified date. As of September 30, 2017, the maturity of currency forward contracts ranged from one month to 18 months.
We designate certain currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted raw material purchases, certain production costs or capital expenditures with exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of foreign exchange risk is deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. With respect to hedges of forecasted raw material purchases or production costs, the
- 13 -
amount deferred is subsequently reclassified into costs of products sold in the period that inventory produced using the hedged transaction affects earnings. For hedged capital expenditures, deferred gains or losses are reclassified and included in the historical cost of the capital asset and subsequently affect earnings as depreciation is recognized. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative is recognized directly to earnings and reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income as non-operating income (expense) under the caption “Other, net.”
We had the following outstanding derivatives that were used to hedge foreign exchange risks associated with forecasted transactions and designated as hedging instruments:
September 30 2017
December 31 2016
Derivative
Sell/Buy - sell notional
Philippine Peso / British Pound
19,047
Euro / British Pound
11,428
10,373
U.S. Dollar / Euro
1,471
Canadian Dollar / U.S. Dollar
20
Sell/Buy - buy notional
Euro / Philippine Peso
857,103
699,279
British Pound / Philippine Peso
644,076
557,025
7,799
15,379
Euro / U.S. Dollar
54,135
43,951
U.S. Dollar / Canadian Dollar
32,760
35,290
British Pound / Euro
335
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments - Foreign Currency Hedges We also enter into forward foreign exchange contracts to mitigate the impact changes in currency exchange rates have on balance sheet monetary assets and liabilities. None of these contracts are designated as hedges for financial accounting purposes and, accordingly, changes in value of the foreign exchange forward contracts and in the offsetting underlying on-balance-sheet transactions are reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income under the caption “Other, net.”
The following sets forth derivatives used to mitigate the impact changes in currency exchange rates have on balance sheet monetary assets and liabilities:
U.S. Dollar / British Pound
17,500
10,500
1,000
2,500
4,500
3,500
12,000
18,500
These contracts have maturities of one month from the date originally entered into.
Fair Value Measurements The following table summarizes the fair values of derivative instruments for the period indicated and the line items in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets where the instruments are recorded:
Prepaid Expenses
and Other
Balance sheet caption
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Designated as hedging:
Forward foreign currency
exchange contracts
1,416
2,625
5,672
1,493
Not designated as hedging:
679
60
780
104
The amounts set forth in the table above represent the net asset or liability giving effect to rights of offset with each counterparty. The effect of netting the amounts presented above did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position.
The following table summarizes the amount of income or (loss) from derivative instruments recognized in our results of operations for the periods indicated and the line items in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income where the results are recorded:
Forward foreign currency exchange contracts:
Effective portion – cost of products sold
(29
(347
1,687
(264
Ineffective portion – other – net
40
126
(399
exchange contracts:
Other – net
328
332
719
1,396
The impact of activity not designated as hedging was substantially all offset by the remeasurement of the underlying on-balance-sheet item.
The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in
- 14 -
active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
The fair values of the foreign exchange forward contracts are considered to be Level 2. Foreign currency forward contracts are valued using foreign currency forward and interest rate curves. The fair value of each contract is determined by comparing the contract rate to the forward rate and discounting to present value. Contracts in a gain position are recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets under the caption “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” and the value of contracts in a loss position is recorded under the caption “Other current liabilities.”
A rollforward of fair value amounts recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is as follows:
1,882
(178
Deferred (losses) gains
on cash flow hedges
(6,455
(200
Reclassified to earnings
(6,260
(114
We expect substantially all of the amounts recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income will be recorded as a component of the capital asset or realized in results of operations within the next 18 months and the amount ultimately recognized will vary depending on actual market rates.
Credit risk related to derivative activity arises in the event the counterparty fails to meet its obligations to us. This exposure is generally limited to the amounts, if any, by which the counterparty’s obligations exceed our obligation to them. Our policy is to enter into contracts only with financial institutions which meet certain minimum credit ratings.
COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Fox River - Neenah, Wisconsin
Background. We have significant uncertainties associated with environmental claims arising out of the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) in sediments in the lower Fox River, on which our former Neenah facility was located, and in the Bay of Green Bay Wisconsin (collectively, the “Site”). Since the early 1990s, the United States, the State of Wisconsin and two Indian tribes (collectively, the “Governments”) have pursued a cleanup of a 39-mile stretch of river from Little Lake Butte des Morts into Green Bay and natural resource damages (“NRDs”).
The Site has been subject to certain studies, demonstration projects and interim cleanups. The permanent cleanup, known as a “remedial action” under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), consists of sediment dredging, installation of engineered caps and placement of sand covers in various areas in the bed of the river.
The United States originally notified several entities that they were potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”); however, after giving effect to settlements reached with the Governments, the remaining PRPs exposed to continuing obligations to implement the remainder of the cleanup consist of us, Georgia Pacific Consumer Products, L.P. (“Georgia Pacific”) and NCR Corporation (“NCR”). In addition to the government claims, Appvion, Inc. (“Appvion”) retains a claim against us and Georgia Pacific.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has divided the Site into five “operable units,” including the most upstream portion of the Site on which our facility was located (“OU1”) and four downstream reaches of the river and bay (“OU2-5”).
We and WTM I Company, one of the PRPs, implemented the remedial action in OU1 under a consent decree with the Governments; Menasha Corporation made a financial contribution to that work. That project began in 2004 and the work is complete, other than on-going monitoring and maintenance.
For OU2-5, work has proceeded primarily under a Unilateral Administrative Order (“UAO”) issued in November 2007 by the EPA to us and seven other respondents. The majority of that work to date has been funded or conducted by parties other than us, although before the UAO, we contributed to a project in that area and we have conducted about $13.4 million of cleanup work under the UAO in 2015 and 2016. The cleanup is expected to continue through 2018. However, as discussed below, under a consent decree between the United States, Wisconsin, NCR and Appvion we are not responsible for any additional cleanup at the Site.
Litigation and Settlement. In 2008, in an allocation action, NCR and Appvion sued us and many other defendants in an effort to allocate among the liable parties the costs of cleaning up this Site and compensating the Governments for their costs and the natural resource trustees for NRDs. This case has been called the “Whiting litigation.” After several summary judgment rulings and a trial, the trial court entered judgment in the Whiting Litigation allocating to NCR 100% of the costs of (a) the OU2-5 cleanup, (b) NRDs, (c) past and future costs incurred by the Governments in OU2-5, and (d) past and future costs incurred by any of the other parties net of an appropriate equitable adjustment for insurance recoveries.
On appeal, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s ruling, holding that if knowledge and fault were the only equitable factors governing allocation of costs and NRDs at the Site, NCR
- 15 -
would owe 100% of all costs and damages in OU2-5, but would not have a share of costs in OU1 -- which is upstream of the outfall of the facilities for which NCR is responsible -- solely as an “arranger for disposal” of PCB-containing waste paper by recycling it at our mill. However, the court of appeals vacated the judgment and remanded the case for the district court’s further consideration of whether any other equitable factors might cause the district court to alter its allocation.
In 2010, in an enforcement action, the Governments sued us and other defendants for (a) an injunction to require implementation of the cleanup ordered by the 2007 UAO, (b) recovery of the Governments’ past and future costs of response, (c) recovery of NRDs, and (d) recovery of a declaration of liability for the Site. After appeals, the Governments did not obtain an injunction and they withdrew their claims for NRDs. The Governments obtained a declaration of our liability to comply with the 2007 UAO. The Governments’ costs claims remained pending.
On January 17, 2017, the United States filed a consent decree with the federal district court among the United States, Wisconsin, NCR, and Appvion (the “NCR/Appvion consent decree”) under which NCR would agree to complete the remaining cleanup and both NCR and Appvion would agree not to seek to recover from us or anyone else any amounts they have spent or will spend, and we and others would be barred from seeking claims against NCR or Appvion. On March 29, 2017, the United States moved for entry of a somewhat revised version of the NCR/Appvion consent decree, which the federal district court entered on August 23, 2017. Under the consent decree, if it were to withstand any appeal, we would only face exposure to: (i) government past oversight costs, (ii) government future oversight costs, (iii) long term monitoring and maintenance, and (iv) depending on the reason, a further remedy if necessary in the event the currently ordered remedy fails, over 30 or more years, to achieve its objectives. As the result of earlier settlements, Georgia Pacific is only jointly liable with us to the Governments for monitoring and maintenance costs incurred in the most downstream three miles of the river (“OU4b”) and the bay of Green Bay (“OU5”).
In addition, we and Georgia Pacific had claims against each other to reallocate the costs that we have each incurred or will incur. We have settled those claims. Under this settlement, Georgia Pacific has agreed to implement the monitoring and maintenance in OU4b and OU5 and we would be responsible for monitoring and maintenance of all other upstream Operable Units. We paid Georgia Pacific $9.5 million in August 2017.
The NCR/Appvion consent decree and our settlement with Georgia Pacific resulted in all claims among the responsible parties being barred, waived, or withdrawn. Accordingly, on October 10, 2017, the federal district court
approved a stipulation dismissing all remaining claims in the Whiting litigation. Therefore, unless certain limited circumstances occur permitting reassertion of claims, we are not subject to claims for reallocation of costs or damages incurred by any of the other parties and we cannot seek contribution or reallocation from them.
On October 20, 2017, we appealed the district court’s approval of the NCR/Appvion consent decree. We contend that the court did not do what was required to properly conclude that the NCR/Appvion consent decree was substantially fair to us. We contend that the consent decree was unfair to us.
Cost estimates. The proposed NCR/Appvion consent decree, as revised, states that all parties combined have spent more than approximately $1 billion to date towards remedial actions and NRDs, of which we have contributed approximately $75 million. In addition, work to complete the remaining site remedy under the UAO was anticipated to cost approximately $200 million at the beginning of the 2017 remediation season. With the consent decree being entered, we are no longer exposed to reallocation of any of those amounts.
Under the NCR/Appvion consent decree, we would remain responsible for the Governments’ unreimbursed past costs, which although in dispute, are represented to total approximately $34 million and the Governments’ future costs. Furthermore, we, along with Georgia Pacific, would be responsible for long term monitoring and maintenance required pursuant to the Lower Fox River 100% Remedial Design Report dated December 2009 – Long Term Monitoring Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan requires long term monitoring of each of OU1 through OU5 over a period of at least 30 years. The monitoring activities consist of, among others, testing fish tissue, sampling water quality and sediment, and inspections of the engineered caps. Each operable unit is required to be monitored; however, because of our settlement with Georgia Pacific, our obligations are in OU1-OU4a. Although we are unable to determine with certainty the timing of cash expenditures for the above matters, they are reasonably likely to extend over a period of at least 30 years.
- 16 -
Reserves for the Site. Our reserve for all remaining claims against us relating to PCB contamination is set forth below:
52,788
17,105
Payments
(9,581
(4,193
Accruals
43,207
12,912
The payments set forth above represent cash paid towards completion of remediation activities in connection with the 2016 and 2015 Work Plans, the Georgia-Pacific settlement and ongoing monitoring activities. Of our total reserve for the Fox River, $20.0 million is recorded in the accompanying September 30, 2017 condensed consolidated balance sheet under the caption “Environmental liabilities” and the remaining $23.2 million is recorded under the caption “Other long term liabilities.”
Range of Reasonably Possible Outcomes. Based on our analysis of all available information, including but not limited to decisions of the courts, official documents such as records of decision, discussions with legal counsel, cost estimates for
future monitoring and maintenance and other post-remediation costs to be performed at the Site, we believe it is reasonably possible that our costs associated with the Fox River matter could exceed the aggregate amounts accrued by amounts ranging from insignificant to approximately $30 million. We believe the likelihood of an outcome in the upper end of the monetary range is less than other possible outcomes within the range and the possibility of an outcome in excess of the upper end of the monetary range is remote.
Summary. Our current assessment is we will be able to manage this environmental matter without a long-term, material adverse impact on the Company. This matter could, however, at any particular time or for any particular year or years, have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity and/or results of operations or could result in a default under our debt covenants. Moreover, there can be no assurance our reserves will be adequate to provide for future obligations related to this matter, or our share of costs and/or damages will not exceed our available resources, or those obligations will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity and results of operations and might result in a default under our loan covenants.
- 17 -
SEGMENT INFORMATION
The following tables set forth financial and other information by business unit for the period indicated:
Advanced Airlaid
Other and
Dollars in millions
Composite Fibers
Materials
Specialty Papers
Unallocated
142.3
131.7
67.8
61.9
203.2
211.8
413.3
405.3
1.2
1.3
Total revenue
204.4
213.1
414.6
406.6
Cost of products sold
115.0
105.8
57.2
53.5
179.7
180.1
7.9
6.1
359.8
345.5
Gross profit (loss)
27.3
25.9
10.6
8.4
24.7
33.0
(7.9
(6.1
54.7
61.2
SG&A
10.9
11.9
2.4
2.0
12.2
14.3
7.5
33.4
35.7
(Gains) losses on dispositions of plant,
equipment and timberlands, net
Total operating income (loss)
16.4
14.0
8.2
6.4
12.5
18.7
(15.8
(13.6
21.4
25.4
Non-operating expense
(5.0
(4.4
Income (loss) before
income taxes
(20.8
(18.0
21.0
Supplementary Data
Net tons sold (thousands)
43.8
39.1
26.2
25.2
197.1
197.3
267.1
261.5
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
7.1
6.9
2.5
8.0
3.8
0.6
16.3
Capital expenditures
5.1
12.6
4.3
10.2
26.7
4.5
31.1
36.6
Nine months ended September 30
400.6
391.6
190.4
183.4
600.3
638.9
1,191.4
1,213.9
3.3
4.0
603.6
642.9
1,194.7
1,217.9
322.2
316.0
160.7
157.5
555.7
574.1
8.6
1,052.6
1,056.2
78.4
75.6
29.7
47.9
68.8
(14.0
(8.6
142.1
161.7
32.9
35.1
6.2
36.0
40.9
22.6
100.5
104.8
45.5
40.5
22.8
19.7
27.9
(38.7
(31.2
41.7
56.9
(13.7
(12.7
(52.4
(43.9
44.2
124.5
116.7
76.6
74.1
578.4
597.7
779.5
788.5
20.9
21.2
7.0
22.9
5.4
1.8
56.3
49.7
13.7
36.1
25.0
77.4
11.3
102.2
116.9
The sum of individual amounts set forth above may not agree to the consolidated financial statements included herein due to rounding.
Business Units Results of individual business units are presented based on our management accounting practices and management structure. There is no comprehensive, authoritative body of guidance for management accounting equivalent to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; therefore, the financial results of individual business units are not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other company. The management accounting process uses assumptions and allocations to measure performance of the business units. Methodologies are refined from time to time as management accounting practices are enhanced and businesses change. The costs incurred by support areas not directly aligned with the business unit are allocated primarily based on an estimated utilization of support area services or are included in “Other and Unallocated” in the Business Unit Performance table.
Management evaluates results of operations of the business units before pension expense, certain corporate level costs, and the effects of certain gains or losses not considered to be related to the core business operations. Management believes that this is a more meaningful representation of the operating performance of its core businesses, the profitability of business units and the extent of cash flow generated from these core operations. Such amounts are presented under the caption “Other and Unallocated.” In the evaluation of business unit results, management does not use any measures of total assets. This presentation is aligned with the management and operating structure of our company. It is also on this basis that the Company’s performance is evaluated internally and by the Company’s Board of Directors.
- 18 -
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our 5.375% Notes issued by P. H. Glatfelter Company (the “Parent”) are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by certain of our 100%-owned domestic subsidiaries, PHG Tea Leaves, Inc., Mollanvick, Inc., Glatfelter Composite Fibers N. A., Inc. (“CFNA”), Glatfelter Advance Materials N.A., Inc. (“GAMNA”), and Glatfelter Holdings, LLC. The guarantees are subject to certain customary release provisions including i) the designation of such subsidiary as an unrestricted or excluded subsidiary; (ii) in connection with any sale or disposition of the capital stock of the subsidiary guarantor; or (iii) upon our exercise of our legal defeasance option or our covenant defeasance option, all of which are more fully described in the Indenture dated as of October 3, 2012 and the First Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 27, 2015, among us, the Guarantors and US Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to the 5.375% Notes.
The following presents our condensed consolidating statements of income, including comprehensive income, for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, our condensed consolidating balance sheets as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and our condensed consolidating cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the three months ended September 30, 2017
Parent
Company
Guarantors
Non
Adjustments/
Eliminations
Consolidated
203,205
20,588
211,331
(21,799
204,441
188,677
19,525
173,423
15,764
1,063
37,908
expenses
18,730
536
14,133
(Gain) loss on dispositions of plant
70
Operating income (loss)
(3,036
641
23,755
Other non-operating
income (expense)
(5,241
(300
(436
1,430
160
1,316
(1,430
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries
17,880
18,096
(35,976
(1,920
944
Total other non-operating
13,297
17,192
513
10,261
17,833
24,268
Income tax provision (benefit)
(1,844
(47
6,172
14,812
14,959
(29,771
32,692
33,055
(65,747
- 19 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017
600,346
63,173
591,926
(64,065
603,692
568,067
60,158
488,466
35,625
3,015
103,460
55,976
846
43,662
118
(188
(20,469
2,357
59,778
(15,084
(619
(1,377
4,049
451
3,714
93
(4,049
50,298
51,197
(101,495
(6,445
4,014
37,190
47,847
2,730
16,721
50,204
62,508
(1,273
11,311
43,878
43,344
(87,222
94,176
94,541
(188,717
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the three months ended September 30, 2016
211,761
18,086
192,214
(16,760
213,107
186,297
16,732
159,208
26,810
1,354
33,006
21,048
(25
14,724
(2
5,755
1,379
18,284
(4,332
(1
(751
1,189
173
(1,189
17,228
16,225
(33,453
(670
(819
916
12,399
16,468
170
18,154
17,847
18,454
(1,447
619
2,229
Other comprehensive loss
(2,307
(2,462
4,769
14,921
13,763
(28,684
- 20 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income for the nine months ended September 30, 2016
638,918
54,293
573,355
(52,634
642,931
582,751
51,493
474,599
60,180
2,800
98,756
62,115
(246
42,927
Loss on dispositions of plant
(1,946
3,046
55,809
(13,036
(2,352
3,425
523
3,056
50
(3,425
46,485
44,050
(90,535
(1,787
(2,220
3,051
32,185
44,885
749
30,239
47,931
56,558
(7,495
1,446
12,508
(2,691
(2,835
5,526
43,794
41,215
(85,009
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2017
374
682
83,231
Other current assets
226,678
287,440
289,956
(316,866
487,208
383,014
70,093
402,910
Investments in subsidiaries
885,734
634,893
(1,520,627
129,617
139,665
269,282
1,625,417
993,108
915,762
(1,837,493
Current liabilities
436,791
58,602
157,486
357,441
49,000
52,584
14,478
(541
51,660
106,111
313
19,139
914,821
107,374
280,869
- 21 -
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2016
5,082
1,461
48,901
206,002
256,289
242,187
(265,663
438,815
360,521
31,455
383,922
789,565
540,029
(1,329,594
123,010
128,092
251,102
1,484,180
829,234
803,102
(1,595,257
426,628
26,085
135,961
283,686
14,000
65,961
10,221
(729
45,503
109,819
15,648
830,354
39,669
263,073
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017
Net cash provided (used) by
(17,066
(3,241
73,103
(55,415
(32,847
(13,910
Repayments from intercompany loans
(12,000
Advances of intercompany loans
(13,500
13,500
Intercompany capital contributed
(2,000
2,400
Total investing activities
(57,507
(34,538
3,900
Net long-term borrowings
73,298
35,000
(18,711
89,587
Payment of dividends to shareholders
Repayments of intercompany loans
Borrowings of intercompany loans
Intercompany capital received
2,000
400
(2,400
Payment of intercompany dividend
Total financing activities
69,865
37,000
(30,311
(3,900
Effect of exchange rate on cash
Net increase (decrease) in cash
(4,708
(779
34,330
Cash at the beginning of period
Cash at the end of period
- 22 -
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2016
41,753
3,748
13,936
(78,187
(21,066
(17,695
41
14
11,101
(11,101
(12,330
12,330
Intercompany capital (contributed) returned
(17,000
(500
(95,546
(22,795
(17,681
18,729
14,983
Payments of borrowing costs
Intercompany capital (returned) received
17,000
500
(17,500
3,251
(1,679
19,000
4,382
(18,729
(55,472
59,130
465
45,709
3,658
418
46,676
- 23 -
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein and Glatfelter’s Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Forward-Looking Statements This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact, including statements regarding industry prospects and future consolidated financial position or results of operations, made in this Report on Form 10-Q are forward looking. We use words such as “anticipates”, “believes”, “expects”, “future”, “intends” and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect management’s current expectations and are inherently uncertain. Our actual results may differ significantly from such expectations. The following discussion includes forward-looking statements regarding expectations of, among others, shipping volumes, selling prices, input costs, non-cash pension expense, environmental costs, capital expenditures and liquidity, all of which are inherently difficult to predict. Although we make such statements based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. Accordingly, we identify the following important factors, among others, which could cause our results to differ from any results that might be projected, forecasted or estimated in any such forward-looking statements:
i.
variations in demand for our products including the impact of unplanned market-related downtime, variations in product pricing, or product substitution;
ii.
the impact of competition, both domestic and international, changes in industry production capacity, including the construction of new mills or new machines, the closing of mills and incremental changes due to capital expenditures or productivity increases;
iii.
risks associated with our international operations, including local economic and political environments and fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
iv.
geopolitical events, including the impact of conflicts such as Russia and Ukraine;
v.
our ability to develop new, high value-added products;
vi.
changes in the cost or availability of raw materials we use, in particular pulpwood, pulp, pulp substitutes, caustic soda, and abaca fiber;
vii.
changes in energy-related costs and commodity raw materials with an energy component;
viii.
the impact of unplanned production interruption;
ix.
disruptions in production and/or increased costs due to labor disputes including an inability to renew our collective bargaining arrangement for the Spring Grove, PA facility which expired in February 2017;
x.
the impact of exposure to volatile market-based pricing for sales of excess electricity;
xi.
the gain or loss of significant customers and/or on-going viability of such customers;
xii.
cost and other effects of environmental compliance, cleanup, damages, remediation or restoration, or personal injury or property damages related thereto, such as the costs of natural resource restoration or damages related to the presence of polychlorinated biphenyls ("PCBs") in the lower Fox River on which our former Neenah mill was located;
xiii.
our ability to successfully complete the implementation of new manufacturing and business systems to support Advanced Airlaid Materials;
xiv.
adverse results in litigation in the Fox River matter;
xv.
the impact of war and terrorism;
xvi.
the impact of unfavorable outcomes of audits by various state, federal or international tax authorities or changes in pre-tax income and its impact on the valuation of deferred taxes;
xvii.
enactment of adverse state, federal or foreign tax or other legislation or changes in government policy or regulation; and
xviii.
our ability to finance, consummate and integrate acquisitions.
Introduction We manufacture a wide array of specialty papers and engineered materials. We manage our company along three business units:
•
Composite Fibers with revenue from the sale of single-serve tea and coffee filtration papers, nonwoven wallcovering base materials, metallized products, composite laminate papers, and many technically special papers including substrates for electrical applications;
Advanced Airlaid Materials with revenue from the sale of airlaid nonwoven fabric-like materials used in feminine hygiene and adult incontinence products, specialty wipes, home care products and other airlaid applications; and
Specialty Papers with revenue from the sale of papers for carbonless and other forms, envelopes, book publishing, and engineered products such as papers for high-speed ink jet printing, office specialty products, greeting cards, packaging, casting, release, transfer, playing card, postal, FDA-compliant food, and other niche specialty applications.
- 24 -
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus the nine months ended September 30, 2016
Overview For the first nine months of 2017 net income totaled $18.0 million, or $0.41 per diluted share compared with $37.7 million and $0.86 per diluted share in the year earlier period.
The following table sets forth summarized consolidated results of operations:
Earnings per diluted share
Reported results in the first nine months of 2017 and 2016 include on a pre-tax basis $19.5 million and $8.0 million, respectively, of net costs considered to be unusual or non-core business in nature. The decline in our results summarized in the table above reflects the $11.5 million increase in such costs. Our Composite Fibers and Advanced Airlaid Materials businesses, which combined represented approximately 50% of consolidated net sales, reported higher operating income and operating margin expansion in the comparison driven by higher shipping volumes and improved productivity. Specialty Papers’ results declined significantly in the comparison reflecting challenging market conditions.
In addition to the results reported in accordance with GAAP, we evaluate our performance using adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share. We disclose this information to allow investors to evaluate our performance exclusive of certain items that impact the comparability of results from period to period and we believe it is helpful in understanding underlying operating trends and cash flow generation. Adjusted earnings consists of net income determined in accordance with GAAP adjusted to exclude the impact of the following:
Cost optimization actions. These adjustments reflects charges incurred in connection with initiatives to optimize the cost structure of certain business units in response to changes in business conditions. The costs are primarily related to headcount reduction efforts, asset write-offs and certain contract termination costs.
Specialty Papers environmental compliance. These adjustments reflect non-capitalized, one-time costs incurred by the business unit directly related to the compliance with the U.S. EPA Best Available Retrofit Technology rule and the Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology rule. This adjustment includes costs incurred during the transition period in which the newly installed equipment was brought on-line.
Airlaid capacity expansion costs. These adjustments reflect non-capitalized, one-time costs incurred related to the start-up of a new airlaid production facility in Fort Smith, Arkansas.
Timberland sales and related costs. These adjustments exclude gains from the sales of timberlands as these items are not considered to be part of our core business, ongoing results of operations or cash flows. These adjustments are irregular in timing and amount and may significantly impact our operating performance.
Adjusted earnings and adjusted earnings per diluted share are considered measures not calculated in accordance with GAAP, and therefore are non-GAAP measures. The non-GAAP financial information should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table sets forth the reconciliation of net income to adjusted earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
Amount
Diluted EPS
Adjustments (pre-tax)
Cost optimization actions
9,627
88
Specialty Papers' environmental compliance
3,076
6,645
Airlaid capacity expansion costs
7,034
1,308
Timberland sales and related costs
Total adjustments (pre-tax)
19,549
8,041
Income taxes (1)
(1,122
(2,736
Total after-tax adjustments
18,427
5,305
0.12
Adjusted earnings
36,421
0.82
43,039
0.98
Tax effect on adjustments calculated based on the incremental effective tax rate of the jurisdiction in which each adjustment originated and the related impact of valuation allowances.
The sum of individual per share amounts set forth above may not agree to adjusted earnings per share due to rounding.
- 25 -
Business Unit Performance
- 26 -
Sales and Costs of Products Sold
Change
(22,552
Energy and related
sales, net
(667
(23,219
(3,583
(19,636
Gross profit as a percent
of Net sales
13.3
The following table sets forth the contribution to consolidated net sales by each business unit:
Percent of Total
Business Unit
33.6
32.3
Advanced Airlaid Material
16.0
15.1
50.4
52.6
100.0
Net sales totaled $1,191.4 million and $1,213.9 million in the first nine months of 2017 and 2016, respectively. The $22.5 million decrease was primarily driven by $22.4 million of lower selling prices. Shipping volumes decreased 1.1%.
Composite Fibers’ net sales increased $9.0 million, or 2.3%. Shipping volumes increased 6.7%. However, currency translation and lower selling prices adversely impacted the comparison by $6.7 million and $6.3 million, respectively.
Composite Fibers’ operating income for the first nine months of 2017 increased $5.0 million to $45.5 million compared to the year-ago period primarily due to a $9.7 million benefit from improved operations including the impact of our cost optimization program initiated in late 2016 and the benefit of higher shipping volumes, improved machine utilization rates and reduced downtime. The primary drivers are summarized in the following chart:
Advanced Airlaid Materials’ net sales increased $7.0 million in the year-over-year comparison primarily due to higher shipping volumes which increase 3.4% due to higher shipments of wipes and personal hygiene products.
Advanced Airlaid Materials’ operating income totaled $22.8 million, an increase of $3.1 million compared to the same period a year ago. The primary drivers are summarized in the following chart:
Specialty Papers’ net sales decreased $38.6 million, or 6.0%, due to a 3.2% decrease in shipping volumes and a $16.4 million impact from lower selling prices.
Operating income totaled $11.9 million in the first nine months of 2017, compared with $27.9 million for the first nine months of 2016. The business unit continues to be adversely impacted by a supply/demand imbalance affecting the broader uncoated freesheet market as reflected as lower pricing and volume in the chart below. Aggressive cost control actions, lower maintenance spending and improved operating performance contributed to the $8.3 million benefit from operations. The primary drivers of the change are summarized in the following chart:
- 27 -
We sell excess power generated by the Spring Grove, PA facility. The following table summarizes this activity for the first nine months of 2017 and 2016:
Energy sales
2,379
2,919
(540
Costs to produce
(3,121
(3,229
108
Net
(742
(310
(432
Renewable energy credits
4,088
4,323
(235
Renewable energy credits (“RECs”) represent sales of certified credits earned related to burning renewable sources of energy such as black liquor and wood waste. We sell RECs into an illiquid market. The extent and value of future revenues from REC sales is dependent on many factors outside of management’s control. Therefore, we may not be able to generate consistent additional sales of RECs in future periods.
Other and Unallocated The amount of net operating expenses not allocated to a business unit and reported as “Other and Unallocated” in our table of Business Unit Performance totaled $38.7 million in the first nine months of 2017 compared with $31.2 million in the first nine months of 2016. The increase in Other and Unallocated expenses primarily related to costs incurred in connection with our cost optimization actions and the Airlaid capacity expansion project, partially offset by lower costs for Specialty Papers’ environmental compliance project and the legal costs for the Fox River matter.
Pension Expense The following table summarizes the amounts of pension expense recognized for the periods indicated:
Recorded as:
2,534
1,761
773
SG&A expense
2,441
2,365
76
849
The amount of pension expense recognized each year is dependent on various actuarial assumptions and certain other factors, including discount rates and the fair value of our pension assets. Pension expense for the full year of 2017 is expected to be approximately $6.6 million compared with $5.5 million in 2016 (which excludes a $7.3 million settlement charge).
Income taxes For the first nine months of 2017, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $9.9 million on pre-tax income of $27.9 million. The comparable amounts in the first nine months of 2016 were $6.5 million and $44.2 million,
respectively. The effective tax rate was 35.5% in the first nine months of 2017 compared with 14.6% in the same period of 2016. This year’s tax provision includes a benefit of $2.4 million primarily from a tax loss carryback opportunity and the release of U.S. tax reserves due to the lapse of statute of limitations. The tax provision also reflects the adverse impact of an increase in unrecognized tax benefits and in our valuation allowances for U.S. deferred tax assets. We currently expect to record valuation allowances of between $13 million and $16 million for the full year 2017. The effective tax rate in future periods may be affected by changes in U.S.-based pre-tax income, including pension expense, and the related impact on the valuation of deferred taxes.
Foreign Currency We own and operate facilities in Canada, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and the Philippines. The functional currency of our Canadian operations is the U.S. dollar. However, in Germany and France it is the Euro, in the UK, it is the British Pound Sterling, and in the Philippines the functional currency is the Peso. On an annual basis, our euro denominated revenue exceeds euro expenses by approximately €125 million to €130 million. For the first nine months of 2017, the average currency exchange rate for euro to the U.S. dollar was 1.113 compared with 1.116 for the same period of 2016. With respect to the British Pound Sterling, Canadian dollar, and Philippine Peso, we have differing amounts of inflows and outflows of these currencies, although to a lesser degree than the euro. As a result, we are exposed to changes in currency exchange rates and such changes could be significant. The translation of the results from international operations into U.S. dollars is subject to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
The table below summarizes the translation impact on reported results that changes in currency exchange rates had on our non-U.S. based operations from the conversion of these operation’s results for the first nine months of 2017.
Favorable
(unfavorable)
(6,752
7,366
SG&A expenses
615
Income taxes and other
320
1,549
The above table only presents the financial reporting impact of foreign currency translations assuming currency exchange rates in 2017 were the same as 2016. It does not present the impact of certain competitive advantages or disadvantages of operating or competing in multi-currency markets.
- 28 -
Three months ended September 30, 2017 versus the three months ended September 30, 2016
Overview For the third quarter of 2017, net income totaled $12.1 million, or $0.27 per diluted share compared with net income of $19.6 million, or $0.44 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2016. On an adjusted basis earnings for the third quarter of 2017 was $21.9 million, or $0.50 per diluted share compared with $24.0 million, or $0.54 per diluted share, for the same period a year ago.
The following table sets forth summarized results of operations:
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of net income to adjusted earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
Cost optimization
6,839
Specialty Papers' environmental compliance and other
596
5,520
2,581
1,051
9,902
6,571
(123
(2,193
9,779
0.22
4,378
0.10
21,884
0.50
23,979
0.54
- 29 -
8,024
Energy and related sales,
net
(110
7,914
14,349
(6,435
13.2
34.4
32.5
15.3
49.2
52.2
Net sales totaled $413.3 million and $405.3 million in the third quarters of 2017 and 2016, respectively. Shipping volumes increased 2.1% and foreign currency translation favorably impacted the quarter-over-quarter comparison by $6.0 million. Lower selling prices unfavorably impacted the comparison by $8.0 million.
Composite Fibers’ net sales increased $10.7 million, or 8.1%, primarily due to higher shipping volumes and $4.2 million of favorable currency translation partially offset by $2.3 million from lower selling prices.
Composite Fibers’ third quarter of 2017 operating income increased to $16.4 million, an increase of $2.4 million compared to the year ago quarter. Higher shipping volumes combined with higher machine utilization rates and solid operating performance improved earnings by $5.8 million. The primary drivers are summarized in the following chart:
Advanced Airlaid Materials’ net sales increased $5.9 million in the quarter-over-quarter comparison. Shipping volumes increased 4.2% primarily due to continued growth of personal hygiene and wipes products and $1.8 million favorable impact from currency translation.
Advanced Airlaid Materials’ operating income totaled $8.2 million compared with $6.4 million in the third quarter of 2016. The primary drivers are summarized in the following chart:
Specialty Papers’ net sales decreased $8.6 million, or 4.0%, as its markets continued to be impacted by a supply-demand imbalance resulting in $6.5 million of lower selling prices.
Specialty Papers’ operating income totaled $12.5 million in the third quarter of 2017, compared with $18.7 million in the same period a year ago. The primary drivers are summarized in the following chart:
Aggressive cost control actions and lower maintenance spending more than offset the adverse impact of market-related downtime and higher depreciation, and increased operating income by $1.8 million.
- 30 -
We sell excess power generated by the Spring Grove, PA facility. The following table summarizes this activity for the third quarters of 2017 and 2016:
586
1,101
(515
(754
(1,187
433
(168
(86
(82
1,404
1,432
(28
Other and Unallocated The amount of net operating expenses not allocated to a business unit and reported as “Other and Unallocated” in our table of Business Unit Performance excluding gains from sales of timberlands, totaled $15.8 million in the third quarter of 2017 compared with $13.6 million in the third quarter of 2016. The increase in Other and Unallocated expenses primarily related to costs incurred in connection with our cost optimization actions and the Airlaid capacity expansion project, partially offset by lower costs for Specialty Papers’ environmental compliance project and the legal costs for the Fox River matter.
During the third quarter the Company recorded $6.8 million of one-time costs of actions primarily related to the permanent shutdown of a machine and a 15% reduction in salaried workforce in the Specialty Papers business unit. The costs incurred consisted of $4.5 million related to the write-off of the machine and associated spares parts and the balance represented severance costs for the salaried positions. These costs have been excluded from the business unit results and from adjusted earnings.
842
582
260
819
291
Income taxes For the third quarter of 2017, we recorded a $4.3 million provision for income tax pre-tax income of $16.4 million. The comparable amounts in the third quarter of 2016 were $1.4 million of tax provision on pre-tax income of $21.0 million. The current quarter’s tax provision includes a benefit of $2.4 million primarily from a tax loss carryback opportunity and the release of U.S. tax reserves due to the lapse of statute of limitations.
Foreign Currency The table below summarizes the translation impact on reported results that changes in currency
exchange rates had on our non-U.S. based operations from the conversion of these operation’s results for the third quarter of 2017.
Favorable (unfavorable)
6,047
(4,340
(448
1,212
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our business is capital intensive and requires significant expenditures for new or enhanced equipment, to support our research and development efforts, for environmental compliance matters including, but not limited to, the Clean Air Act, and to support our business strategy. In addition, we have mandatory debt service requirements of both principal and interest. The following table summarizes cash flow information for each of the periods presented:
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period
Cash provided (used) by
Effect of exchange rate
changes on cash
Net cash provided (used)
end of period
At September 30, 2017, we had $84.3 million in cash and cash equivalents held by both domestic and foreign subsidiaries. Unremitted earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are deemed to be indefinitely reinvested and therefore no U.S. tax liability is reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. As of September 30, 2017, the majority of our cash is held by our international subsidiaries and the repatriation of such funds would result in additional tax liability. In addition to our cash and cash equivalents, $93.2 million is available under our revolving credit agreement, which matures in March 2020.
- 31 -
Cash provided by operating activities totaled $52.8 million in the first nine months of 2017 compared with $59.4 million in the same period a year ago. The decrease in cash from operations primarily reflects lower cash earnings and the $9.5 million payment related to certain claims in the Fox River matter, partially offset by $4.0 million of lower income tax payments.
Net cash used by investing activities decreased by $15.2 million in the year-over-year comparison primarily due to lower capital expenditures. Capital expenditures are expected to total between $130 million and $135 million for 2017, including approximately $13 million for the Specialty Papers’ environmental compliance projects and approximately $49 million for the Airlaid capacity expansion.
Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $72.7 million in the first nine months of 2017 compared with $3.0 million in the same period of 2016. The increase in cash provided by financing activities primarily reflects additional borrowings under our credit agreement.
The following table sets forth our outstanding long-term indebtedness:
Our revolving credit facility contains a number of customary compliance covenants, the most restrictive of which is a maximum leverage ratio of 3.5x. As of September 30, 2017, the leverage ratio, as calculated in accordance with the definition in our amended credit agreement, was 2.6x, within the limits set forth in our credit agreement. Based on our expectations of future results of operations and capital needs, we do not believe the debt covenants will impact our operations or limit our ability to undertake financings that may be necessary to meet our capital needs.
The 5.375% Notes contain cross default provisions that could result in all such notes becoming due and payable in the event of a failure to repay debt outstanding under the credit agreement at maturity, or a default under the credit agreement that accelerates the debt outstanding thereunder. As of September 30, 2017, we met all of the requirements of our debt covenants. The significant terms of the debt instruments
are more fully discussed in Item 1 - Financial Statements – Note 10.
Financing activities includes cash used for common stock dividends which increased in the comparison reflecting a 4% increase in our quarterly cash dividend. In the first nine months of 2017, we used $16.8 million of cash for dividends on our common stock compared with $16.1 million in the same period of 2016. Our Board of Directors determines what, if any, dividends will be paid to our shareholders. Dividend payment decisions are based upon then-existing factors and conditions and, therefore, historical trends of dividend payments are not necessarily indicative of future payments.
We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations intended to protect the environment as well as human health and safety. At various times, we have incurred significant costs to comply with these regulations and we could incur additional costs as new regulations are developed or regulatory priorities change.
As more fully discussed in Item 1 - Financial Statements – Note 13 – Commitments, Contingencies and Legal Proceedings (“Note 13”), we are involved in the Lower Fox River in Wisconsin (the “Fox River”), an EPA Superfund site for which we remain potentially liable for certain response costs and long-term monitoring and maintenance related matters. Based on the recent developments more fully discussed in Note 13, it is conceivable the resolution of this matter may require us to spend in excess of $20.0 million in the next twelve months. Although we are unable to determine with any degree of certainty the amount we may be required to spend the recent developments provide greater clarity to the extent of such amounts.
We expect to meet all of our near and long-term cash needs from a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash equivalents, our existing credit facility and other long-term debt. However, as discussed in Note 13, an unfavorable outcome of the Fox River matters could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, liquidity and/or results of operations.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had not entered into any off-balance-sheet arrangements. Financial derivative instruments, to which we are a party, and guarantees of indebtedness, which solely consist of obligations of subsidiaries, are reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets included herein in Item 1 – Financial Statements.
Outlook Composite Fibers’ shipping volumes in the fourth quarter of 2017 are expected to be approximately 10% lower than the third quarter driven by normal seasonality with the majority of the impact of lower shipping volumes expected to be offset by improved product mix. Selling prices and overall raw material and energy prices are expected to be in-line with the third quarter.
- 32 -
Advanced Airlaid Materials’ shipping volumes in the fourth quarter are expected to be approximately 3% lower than the third quarter due to normal seasonality. Selling prices and raw material and energy prices are expected to increase slightly compared with the third quarter. For 2018, we anticipate shipping volumes to be 10% to 15% higher than 2017 driven by the start-up of the Fort Smith, Arkansas facility.
Specialty Papers’ shipping volumes in the fourth quarter are expected to be approximately 5% lower than the third quarter of 2017 due to normal seasonality. Selling prices are expected to be in-line and raw material and energy prices are expected to increase compared to the third quarter. Specialty Papers will also benefit by $1 million more than the third quarter from the cost reduction actions.
In addition, costs associated with the Specialty Papers environmental compliance projects and Advanced Airlaid Materials capacity expansion are expected to be $1 million and $3 million, respectively, during the fourth quarter and zero and $3 million in 2018.
Consolidated capital expenditures are expected to total between $130 million and $135 million for 2017 and approximately between $65 million to $70 million in 2018.
The effective tax rate on adjusted earnings is expected to be approximately 35% for the fourth quarter of 2017 and for 2018.
- 33 -
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
Year Ended December 31
Dollars in thousands
2018
2019
2020
2021
Carrying Value
Average principal outstanding
At fixed interest rates – Bond
218,750
At fixed interest rates – Term Loans
63,942
55,963
44,841
33,720
22,598
63,943
64,583
At variable interest rates
32,979
Weighted-average interest rate
On fixed rate debt – Bond
5.375
On fixed rate debt – Term Loans
1.89
1.88
1.86
1.82
On variable rate debt
2.74
The table above presents the average principal outstanding and related interest rates for the next five years for debt outstanding as of September 30, 2017. Fair values included herein have been determined based upon rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Our market risk exposure primarily results from changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. At September 30, 2017, we had $470.2 million of long-term debt, net of unamortized debt issuance costs, of which 33.7% was at variable interest rates. Variable-rate debt outstanding represents borrowings under our revolving credit agreement that accrues interest based on LIBOR plus a margin. At September 30, 2017, the interest rate paid was approximately 2.74%. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase or decrease in the interest rate on variable rate debt would increase or decrease annual interest expense by $1.6 million.
As part of our overall risk management practices, we enter into financial derivatives primarily designed to either i) hedge foreign currency risks associated with forecasted transactions – “cash flow hedges”; or ii) mitigate the impact that changes in currency exchange rates have on intercompany financing transactions and foreign currency denominated receivables and payables – “foreign currency hedges.” For a more complete discussion of this activity, refer to Item 1 – Financial Statements – Note 12.
We are subject to certain risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates to the extent our operations are conducted in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. On an annual basis, our euro denominated revenue exceeds euro expenses by approximately €125 million to €130 million. With respect to the British Pound Sterling, Canadian dollar, and Philippine Peso, we have differing amounts of inflows and outflows of these currencies, although to a lesser degree than the euro. As a result, particularly with respect to the euro, we are exposed to changes in currency exchange rates and such changes could be significant.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Our chief executive officer and our principal financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of September 30, 2017, have concluded that, as of the evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Controls There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2017, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
- 34 -
PART II
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference as indicated.
Certification of Dante C. Parrini, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith
31.2
Certification of John P. Jacunski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith
32.1
Certification of Dante C. Parrini, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Glatfelter, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, furnished herewith
32.2
Certification of John P. Jacunski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, furnished herewith
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document, filed herewith
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema, filed herewith
101.CAL
XBRL Extension Calculation Linkbase, filed herewith
101.DEF
XBRL Extension Definition Linkbase, filed herewith
101.LAB
XBRL Extension Label Linkbase, filed herewith
101.PRE
XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase, filed herewith
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
P. H. GLATFELTER COMPANY
(Registrant)
October 31, 2017
By
/s/ David C. Elder
David C. Elder
Vice President, Finance
- 35 -