MGM Resorts - 10-K annual report

(Mark One)

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K: þ

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

     Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act): Yes o No þ

     The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of June 30, 2007 (based on the closing price on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape on June 30, 2007) was $10.3 billion. As of February 25, 2008, 293,845,623 shares of Registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding.

     Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

     MGM MIRAGE is referred to as the “Company” or the “Registrant,” and together with our subsidiaries may also be referred to as “we,” “us” or “our.”

     MGM MIRAGE is one of the world’s leading development companies with significant gaming and resort operations. We believe the resorts we own, manage, and invest in are among the world’s finest casino resorts. MGM MIRAGE was organized as MGM Grand, Inc. on January 29, 1986 and is a Delaware corporation. MGM MIRAGE acts largely as a holding company and its operations are conducted through its wholly-owned subsidiaries.

     Our strategy is based on developing and maintaining competitive advantages in the following areas:

     We execute our strategy through a portfolio approach, seeking to ensure that we own, invest in and manage resorts in each market segment that are superior to our competitors’ resorts. We also seek to own and invest in superior real estate assets, with a blend of developing these assets on our own, partnering with others, and strategically buying and selling real estate.

     Our approach to resort ownership and investment is based on operating the premier resorts in each geographic market and each customer segment in which we operate. We discuss customer segments in the “Resort Operation” section. Regarding our approach to resort locations, we feel it is important to selectively operate in markets with stable regulatory environments. As seen in the table below, this means that a large portion of our resorts are located in Nevada. In addition, we target markets with growth potential. Currently, we believe that international markets, particularly in Asia, offer the most attractive growth opportunities. We also believe there is growth potential in investing in and managing non-gaming resorts. See the “Sustainable Growth” and “Leveraging Our Brand and Management Assets” sections for further details on these initiatives.

     We have provided below certain information about our resorts as of December 31, 2007. Except as otherwise indicated, we wholly own and operate the resorts shown below.

     Further, more detailed information about each of our operating resorts can be found in Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which Exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.

     We believe that ensuring our resorts are the premier resorts in their respective markets requires significant capital investment. We have a track record of reinvesting cash flows into our existing resorts and we have achieved strong returns on these investments in the past.

     For instance, between 2003 and 2006 we invested a significant amount of capital at MGM Grand Las Vegas, with additions such as KÁ, the acclaimed show by Cirque du Soleil; the Skylofts and West Wing room enhancements; two highly acclaimed restaurants by Joël Robuchon; and new poker and race and sports areas. That resort earned $290 million of operating income in 2007, a dramatic increase from the $127 million earned in 2002. Similarly, we transformed The Mirage, a resort many market observers credit with changing the face of the Las Vegas Strip. We felt strongly about the allure of the resort, but also believed that customers need fresh, updated experiences. Therefore, we invested significant capital at The Mirage between 2004 and 2006, adding several new restaurants; a category-defining nightclub, Jet; upgraded high-limit gaming areas; and the Beatles-themed Love show by Cirque du Soleil. The Mirage earned $108 million of operating income in 2003; in 2007, The Mirage earned $173 million of operating income.

     We expect to continue this strategy for the foreseeable future. We have made, and continue to make, investments in Mandalay Bay, Luxor and Excalibur and will continue to analyze the needs for similar investments in our other resorts.

     In addition, we have actively managed our portfolio of land holdings. We own approximately 700 acres of land on the Las Vegas Strip, with a meaningful portion of those acres undeveloped or considered by us to be under-developed. In 2007, we purchased 34 acres of land on the Las Vegas Strip adjacent to our Circus Circus Las Vegas resort. See discussion of recent projects announced for certain of our land holdings in Las Vegas and Atlantic City in the “Sustainable Growth” section.

     The principal risk factors relating to our current portfolio of resorts are:

     Our operating philosophy is predicated on creating resorts of memorable character, treating our employees well and providing superior service for our guests. We also seek to develop competitive advantages in specific markets and among specific customer groups.

     We operate primarily in one segment, the ownership and operation of casino resorts, which includes offering gaming, hotel, dining, entertainment, retail and other resort amenities. Over half of our net revenue is derived from non-gaming activities, a higher percentage than many of our competitors, as our operating philosophy is to provide a complete resort experience for our guests, including non-gaming amenities which command a premium price based on their quality.

     As a resort-based company, our operating results are highly dependent on the volume of customers at our resorts, which in turn impacts the price we can charge for our hotel rooms and other amenities. Since we believe that the number of walk-in customers affects the success of our casino resorts, we design our facilities to maximize their attraction to guests of other hotels. We also generate a significant portion of our operating income from the high-end gaming segment, which can cause variability in our results.

     Most of our revenue is essentially cash-based, through customers wagering with cash or paying for non-gaming services with cash or credit cards. Our resorts, like many in the industry, generate significant operating cash flow. Our industry is capital intensive and we rely heavily on the ability of our resorts to generate operating cash flow to repay debt financing, fund maintenance capital expenditures and provide excess cash for future development.

     Our results of operations do not tend to be seasonal in nature, though a variety of factors can affect the results of any interim period, including the timing of major Las Vegas conventions, the amount and timing of marketing and special events for our high-end customers, and the level of play during major holidays, including New Year and Chinese New Year. Our significant convention and meeting facilities allow us to maximize hotel occupancy and customer volumes during off-peak times such as mid-week or during traditionally slower leisure travel periods, which also leads to better labor utilization. Our results do not depend on key individual customers, though our success in marketing to customer groups, such as convention customers, or the financial health of customer segments, such as business travelers or high-end gaming customers from a particular country or region, can impact our results.

     All of our casino resorts operate 24 hours a day, every day of the year, with the exception of Grand Victoria which operates 22 hours a day, every day of the year. At our wholly-owned resorts, our primary casino and hotel operations are owned and managed by us. Other resort amenities may be owned and operated by us, owned by us but managed by third parties for a fee, or leased to third parties. We generally have an operating philosophy that prefers ownership of amenities, since guests have direct contact with staff in these areas and we prefer to control all aspects of the guest experience. However, we do lease space to retail and food and beverage operators in certain situations, particularly for branding opportunities. We also operate many “managed” outlets, utilizing third party management for specific expertise in areas such as restaurants and nightclubs, as well as for branding opportunities.

     Our casino resorts generally operate in highly competitive environments. We compete against other gaming companies as well as other hospitality and leisure and business travel companies. Our primary methods of competing successfully include:

     Our Las Vegas casino resorts compete for customers with a large number of other hotel-casinos in the Las Vegas area, including major hotel-casinos on or near the Las Vegas Strip, major hotel-casinos in the downtown area, which is about five miles from the center of the Strip, and several major facilities elsewhere in the Las Vegas area. Our Las Vegas Strip resorts also compete, in part, with each other. According to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, there were approximately 133,000 guestrooms in Las Vegas at December 31, 2007, up slightly from approximately 132,600 rooms at December 31, 2006. Las Vegas visitor volume was 39.2 million in 2007, up slightly from the 38.9 million reported for 2006.

     The principal segments of the Las Vegas gaming market are leisure travel; premium gaming customers; conventions, including small meetings and corporate incentive programs; and tour and travel. Our high-end properties, which include Bellagio, MGM Grand Las Vegas, Mandalay Bay, and The Mirage, appeal to the upper end of each market segment, balancing their business by using the convention and tour and travel segments to fill the mid-week and off-peak periods. Our marketing strategy for TI, New York-New York, Luxor and Monte Carlo is aimed at attracting middle- to upper-middle-income wagerers, largely from the leisure travel and, to a lesser extent, the tour and travel segments. Excalibur and Circus Circus Las Vegas generally cater to the value-oriented and middle-income leisure travel and tour and travel segments.

     Outside Las Vegas, our other wholly-owned Nevada operations compete with each other and with many other similar sized and larger operations. A significant portion of our customers at these resorts come from California. We believe the expansion of Native American gaming has had a negative impact on all of our Nevada resorts not located on the Las Vegas Strip, and additional expansion in California could have a further adverse effect on these resorts. Our Nevada resorts not located in Las Vegas appeal primarily to middle-income customers attracted by room, food and beverage and entertainment prices that are lower than those offered by major Las Vegas hotel-casinos. Our target customer for these resorts is the value-oriented leisure traveler and the value-oriented local customer.

     Outside Nevada, our wholly-owned resorts mainly compete for customers in local gaming markets, where location is a critical factor to success. In Tunica, Mississippi, one of our competitors is closer to Memphis, the area’s principal market. In addition, we compete with gaming operations in surrounding jurisdictions and other leisure destinations in each region. For instance, in Detroit, Michigan we also compete with a casino in nearby Windsor, Canada and with Native American casinos in Michigan. In Biloxi, Mississippi we also compete with regional riverboat and land-based casinos in Louisiana, Native American casinos in central Mississippi, the Florida market, and with casinos in the Bahamas.

     Our unconsolidated affiliates mainly compete for customers against casino resorts in their respective markets, and in some cases against our wholly-owned operations. Much like our wholly-owned resorts, our unconsolidated affiliates compete through the quality of amenities, the value of the experience offered to guests, and the location of their resorts.

     Our casino resorts also compete for customers with hotel-casino operations located in other areas of the United States and other parts of the world, and for leisure and business travelers with non-gaming tourist destinations such as Hawaii, Florida and cruise ships. Our gaming operations compete to a lesser extent with state-sponsored lotteries, off-track wagering, card parlors, and other forms of legalized gaming in the United States.

     We advertise on radio, television and billboards and in newspapers and magazines in selected cities throughout the United States and overseas, as well as on the Internet and by direct mail. We also advertise through our regional marketing offices located in major United States and foreign cities. A key element of marketing to premium gaming customers is personal contact by our marketing personnel. Direct marketing is also important in the convention segment. We maintain Internet websites which inform customers about our resorts and allow our customers to reserve hotel rooms, make restaurant reservations and purchase show tickets. We also operate call centers to allow customer contact by phone to make hotel and restaurant reservations and purchase show tickets.

     We utilize our world-class golf courses in marketing programs at our Las Vegas Strip resorts. Our major Las Vegas resorts offer luxury suite packages that include golf privileges at Shadow Creek. In connection with our marketing activities, we also invite our premium gaming customers to play Shadow Creek on a complimentary basis. We use Primm Valley Golf Club for marketing purposes at our Las Vegas resorts, including offering room and golf packages at special rates. Additionally, marketing efforts at Beau Rivage benefit from the Fallen Oak golf course just 20 minutes north of Beau Rivage.

     We believe that knowledgeable, friendly and dedicated employees are a key success factor in the casino resort industry. Therefore, we invest heavily in recruiting, training and retaining our employees, as well as seeking to hire and promote the strongest management team possible. We have numerous programs, both at the corporate and business unit level, designed to achieve these objectives. For example, our diversity program extends throughout our Company, and focuses on the unique strengths of our individuals combined with a culture of working together to achieve greater performance. Our diversity program has been widely recognized, including the honor of “Top 50 Best Companies for Diversity” given by DiversityInc magazine. We have also invested heavily in training, and we believe our programs, such as the MGM Grand University and MGM MIRAGE leadership programs, are best-in-class among our industry peers.

     We utilize technology to maximize revenue and efficiency in our operations. Our Players Club program links our major resorts, and consolidates all slots and table games activity for customers with a Players Club account. Customers qualify for benefits across all of the participating resorts, regardless of where they play. We believe that our Players Club enables us to more effectively market to our customers. A large number of the slot machines at our resorts operate with International Game Technology’s EZ-Pay™ cashless gaming system. We believe that this system enhances the customer experience and increases the revenue potential of our slot machines.

     Technology is a critical part of our strategy in non-gaming and administrative operations as well. Our hotel systems include yield management modules which allow us to maximize occupancy and room rates. Additionally, these systems capture charges made by our customers during their stay, including allowing customers of our resorts to charge meals and services at certain other MGM MIRAGE resorts to their hotel accounts. We implemented a new hotel management system at most of our major resorts in 2007, which we expect will enhance our guest service and improve our yield management across our portfolio of resorts.

     We have a strong culture of compliance, driven by our history in the highly regulated gaming industry and our belief that compliance is often a value-added activity. Our system of internal controls and procedures – including internal control over financial reporting – is designed to ensure reliable and accurate financial records, transparent disclosures, compliance with laws and regulations, and protection of our assets. Our internal controls start at the source of business transactions, and we have rigorous enforcement through controllership at both the business unit and corporate level. Our corporate management also review each of our businesses on a regular basis and we have a corporate internal audit function that performs reviews around gaming compliance, internal controls over financial reporting, and operational areas.

     In connection with the supervision of gaming activities at our casinos, we maintain stringent controls on the recording of all receipts and disbursements and other activities, such as cash transaction reporting. These controls include:

     Marker play represents a significant portion of the table games volume at Bellagio, MGM Grand Las Vegas, Mandalay Bay and The Mirage. Our other facilities do not emphasize marker play to the same extent, although we offer markers to customers at certain of those casinos as well. We maintain strict controls over the issuance of markers and aggressively pursue collection from those customers who fail to pay their marker balances timely. These collection efforts are similar to those used by most large corporations when dealing with overdue customer accounts, including the mailing of statements and delinquency notices, personal contacts, the use of outside collection agencies and civil litigation.

     In Nevada, Mississippi, Michigan, and Illinois, amounts owed for markers which are not timely paid are enforceable under state laws. All other states are required to enforce a judgment for amounts owed for markers entered into in Nevada, Mississippi, Illinois or Michigan which are not timely paid, pursuant to the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution. Amounts owed for markers which are not timely paid are not legally enforceable in some foreign countries, but the United States assets of foreign customers may be reached to satisfy judgments entered in the United States.

     The principal risk factors relating to our operating strategy are:

     Sustainable Growth

     In allocating capital, our financial strategy is focused on managing a proper mix of investing in existing resorts, spending on new resorts or initiatives, repaying long-term debt, and returning capital to shareholders. We have actively allocated capital to each of these areas historically, and expect to continue to do so. We believe there are reasonable investments for us to make in new initiatives that will provide returns in excess of the other options. Primarily, we feel these opportunities are in the areas of large-scale, mixed-use development in established gaming markets, international opportunities for gaming expansion – particularly in Asia – and expansion into non-gaming operations.

     The following sections discuss certain of our current and potential development opportunities. We regularly evaluate possible expansion and acquisition opportunities in both the domestic and international markets, but cannot determine the likelihood of proceeding with specific development opportunities. Opportunities we evaluate may include the ownership, management and operation of gaming and other entertainment facilities in Nevada or in states other than Nevada or outside of the United States. We may undertake these opportunities either alone or in cooperation with one or more third parties.

     We and our joint venture partner are developing CityCenter located on a 67-acre site on the Las Vegas Strip, between Bellagio and Monte Carlo. CityCenter will feature a 4,000-room casino resort designed by world-famous architect Cesar Pelli; two 400-room non-gaming boutique hotels, one of which will be managed by luxury hotelier Mandarin Oriental; approximately 425,000 square feet of retail shops, dining and entertainment venues; and approximately 2.3 million square feet of residential space in approximately 2,700 luxury condominium and condominium-hotel units in multiple towers. CityCenter is expected to open in late 2009. Until November 15, 2007, we owned 100% of CityCenter. At that time, we completed a transaction with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dubai World, a Dubai, United Arab Emirates government decree entity, to form a 50/50 joint venture for the CityCenter development. We will continue to serve as developer of CityCenter and will receive additional consideration of up to $100 million if the project is completed on time and actual development costs, net of residential proceeds, are within specified parameters. Upon completion of construction, we will manage CityCenter for a fee.

     We own approximately 130 acres on Renaissance Pointe in Atlantic City, New Jersey. We lease ten acres to Borgata under long-term leases for use in its current operations and for its expansion. Of the remaining 120 acres, approximately 72 acres are suitable for development. We lease nine of these developable acres to Borgata on a short-term basis for surface parking and a portion of the remaining acres consists of common roads, landscaping and master plan improvements which we designed and developed as required by our agreement with Boyd. We own an additional 15 developable acres in the Marina District near Renaissance Pointe.

     In October 2007 we announced the development of MGM Grand Atlantic City which will be located at the 72-acre site. The proposed resort would include three towers with more than 3,000 total rooms and suites, approximately 5,000 slot machines, 200 table games, 500,000 square-feet of retail, an extensive convention center and other typical resort amenities.

     In September 2007, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with Kerzner International and Istithmar forming a joint venture to develop a multi-billion dollar integrated resort to be located on the southwest corner of Las Vegas Boulevard and Sahara Avenue. The Company will contribute 40 acres of land, which is being valued at $20 million per acre, for fifty percent of the equity in the joint venture. Kerzner International and Istithmar will contribute cash totaling $600 million and each will obtain twenty-five percent of the equity in the joint venture.

     We have entered into an operating agreement to form a 50/50 joint venture with Jeanco Realty Development, LLC, a venture owned by American Nevada Corporation. The venture will master plan and develop a mixed-use community in Jean, Nevada. We will contribute Gold Strike and the surrounding land to the joint venture. The value of this contribution per the operating agreement will be $150 million. We expect to receive a distribution of $55 million upon contribution of the assets to the venture, which is subject to the venture obtaining necessary regulatory and other approvals, and $20 million no later than August 2008.

     The principal risk factors relating to our growth strategy are:

     We also seek to leverage our management expertise and well recognized brands through strategic partnerships and international expansion opportunities. We feel that several of our brands, particularly the “MGM Grand” brand, are well suited to new projects in both gaming and non-gaming developments. The recently opened MGM Grand Macau, the planned MGM Grand Atlantic City, the recently announced MGM Grand Abu Dhabi, and the MGM Grand branded resort currently under construction adjacent to Foxwoods, are all part of our brand expansion strategy.

     In 2007, we formed MGM MIRAGE Hospitality, LLC (“Hospitality”). The purpose of this entity is to source strategic resort investment and management opportunities, both gaming and non-gaming. Hospitality will have a particular focus on international opportunities, where we feel future growth opportunities are greatest. We have strategically hired senior operating and development personnel with established backgrounds in hospitality management and international operations to maximize the profit potential of Hospitality’s operations.

     In November 2007, we announced plans to develop MGM Grand Abu Dhabi, a multi-billion dollar, large-scale, mixed-use development that will serve as an incoming gateway to Abu Dhabi, a United Arab Emirate, located at a prominent downtown waterfront site on Abu Dhabi Island. The project will be wholly owned by Mubadala; we will serve as developer of the project and manage the development for a fee. The initial phase will utilize 50 acres and consist of an MGM Grand hotel, two additional MGM branded luxury hotels, and a variety of luxury residential offerings. Additionally, the development will feature a major entertainment facility, high-end retail shops, and world-class dining and convention facilities.

     The Company entered into a series of agreements to implement a strategic alliance with the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation (“MPTN”), which owns and operates Foxwoods Casino Resort in Ledyard, Connecticut. Under the strategic alliance, we are consulting with MPTN in the development of a new $700 million casino resort currently under construction adjacent to the existing Foxwoods casino resort. The new resort will utilize the “MGM Grand” brand name and is scheduled to open in May 2008. The Company and MPTN have also formed a jointly owned company – Unity Gaming, LLC – to acquire or develop future gaming and non-gaming enterprises. The Company will provide a loan of up to $200 million to finance a portion of MPTN’s investment in joint projects. Unity Gaming, LLC, along with its minority partners, have applied to develop and manage a resort in Kansas, the Chisholm Creek Casino Resort. Other entities have also applied to develop and operate casinos in Kansas and no assurances can be given that the application we are part of will be selected or approved.

     We have signed a definitive agreement with the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse in Beijing, People’s Republic of China, to form a joint venture to develop luxury non-gaming hotels and resorts globally, initially targeting prime locations, including Beijing, in the People’s Republic of China.

     The principal risk factors relating to our brand and management strategy are:

     In addition, to the extent we become involved with development projects as an owner or investor, we are subject to similar risks as described in the “Sustainable Growth” section.

     As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately 54,700 full-time and 12,700 part-time employees. At that date, we had collective bargaining contracts with unions covering approximately 31,300 of our employees. We consider our employee relations to be good. In August 2007, we entered a new five-year collective bargaining agreement covering approximately 21,000 of our Las Vegas Strip employees. This does not include the collective bargaining agreement covering employees at MGM Grand Las Vegas, which expires in 2008. In addition, in October 2007 we entered into a new four year agreement covering approximately 2,900 employees at MGM Grand Detroit.

     The gaming industry is highly regulated, and we must maintain our licenses and pay gaming taxes to continue our operations. Each of our casinos is subject to extensive regulation under the laws, rules and regulations of the jurisdiction where it is located. These laws, rules and regulations generally concern the responsibility, financial stability and character of the owners, managers, and persons with financial interest in the gaming operations. Violations of laws in one jurisdiction could result in disciplinary action in other jurisdictions. A more detailed description of the regulations to which we are subject is contained in Exhibit 99.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which Exhibit is incorporated herein by reference.

     Our businesses are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations in addition to gaming regulations. These laws and regulations include, but are not limited to, restrictions and conditions concerning alcoholic beverages, environmental matters, employees, currency transactions, taxation, zoning and building codes, and marketing and advertising. Such laws and regulations could change or could be interpreted differently in the future, or new laws and regulations could be enacted. Material changes, new laws or regulations, or material differences in interpretations by courts or governmental authorities could adversely affect our operating results.

(Cautionary Statements Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995)

     This Form 10-K and our 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders contain some forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They contain words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “may,” “could,” “might,” and other words or phrases of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. In particular, these include statements relating to future actions, new projects, future performance, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, and future financial results. From time to time, we also provide oral or written forward-looking statements in our Forms 10-Q and 8-K, as well as press releases and other materials we release to the public. Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this Form 10-K, in our 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders and in any other public statements we make may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties. Many factors mentioned in this Form 10-K — for example, government regulation and the competitive environment — will be important in determining our future results. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Our actual future results may differ materially.

     We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Also note that we provide a discussion of risks, uncertainties and possible inaccurate assumptions relevant to our business in Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” This discussion is provided as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

     You should also be aware that while we from time to time communicate with securities analysts, we do not disclose to them any material non-public information, internal forecasts or other confidential business information. Therefore, you should not assume that we agree with any statement or report issued by any analyst, irrespective of the content of the statement or report. To the extent that reports issued by securities analysts contain projections, forecasts or opinions, those reports are not our responsibility.

     The following table sets forth, as of February 15, 2008, the name, age and position of each of our executive officers. Executive officers are elected by and serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

     Mr. Lanni has served as Chairman of the Company since July 1995. He served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company from June 1995 to December 1999, and since March 2001.

     Mr. Murren has served as President of the Company since December 1999 and as Chief Operating Officer since August 2007. He was Chief Financial Officer from January 1998 to August 2007 and Treasurer from November 2001 to August 2007.

     Mr. Baldwin has served as Chief Design and Construction Officer since August 2007. He served as Chief Executive Officer of Mirage Resorts from June 2000 to August 2007 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Bellagio, LLC from June 1996 to March 2005.

     Mr. Jacobs has served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel of the Company since June 2000 and as Secretary since January 2002. Prior thereto, he was a partner with the law firm of Christensen, Glaser, Fink, Jacobs, Weil & Shapiro, LLP, and is currently of counsel to that firm.

     Mr. Manzini has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer since March 2007. Prior thereto, he served as Senior Vice President of Strategic Planning for the Walt Disney Company and in various senior management positions throughout his tenure from April 1990 to January 2007.

     Mr. D’Arrigo has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2007. He served as Senior Vice President—Finance of the Company from February 2005 to August 2007 and as Vice President—Finance of the Company from December 2000 to February 2005.

     Mr. Selwood has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since August 2007. He served as Senior Vice President—Accounting of the Company from February 2005 to August 2007 and as Vice President—Accounting of the Company from December 2000 to February 2005.

     Mr. Feldman has served as Senior Vice President—Public Affairs of the Company since September 2001. He served as Vice President — Public Affairs of the Company from June 2000 to September 2001.

     Mr. Gebhardt has served as Senior Vice President—Global Security of the Company since November 2004. Prior thereto, he served as a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation for over 30 years, and was the FBI’s Deputy Director for two years prior to his retirement in October 2004.

     Ms. James has served as Senior Vice President and Senior Counsel of the Company since March 2002. From 1994 to 2001 she served as Corporation (General) Counsel and Law Department Director for the City of Detroit. In that capacity she also served on various public and quasi-public boards and commissions on behalf of the City, including the Election Commission, the Detroit Building Authority and the Board of Ethics.

     Ms. Mathur has served as Senior Vice President—Corporate Diversity and Community Affairs of the Company since May 2004. She served as Vice President—Corporate Diversity and Community Affairs of the Company from December 2001 to May 2004. She served as Vice President—Community Affairs of the Company from November 2000 to December 2001.

     Ms. Murphey has served as Senior Vice President—Human Resources of the Company since November 2000.

     Mr. Sani has served as Senior Vice President—Taxes of the Company since July 2005. He served as Vice President—Taxes of the Company from June 2002 to July 2005. Prior thereto he was a partner in the Transaction Advisory Services practice of Arthur Andersen LLP, having served that firm in various other capacities since 1988.

     Ms. Santoro has served as Senior Vice President and Treasurer since August 2007. She served as Vice President – Treasury of the Company from August 2004 to August 2007. Prior thereto she was a Vice President for Wells Fargo Bank, serving in the gaming division.

     Mr. Wright has served as Senior Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of the Company since March 2005. He served as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of the Company from July 2001 to March 2005. He has served as Assistant Secretary of the Company since January 2002. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Wright served as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel of Boyd Gaming Corporation and in other legal capacities for Boyd Gaming Corporation from September 1993 to July 2001.

     We maintain a website, www.mgmmirage.com, which includes financial and other information for investors. We provide access to our SEC filings on our website, free of charge, through a link to the SEC’s EDGAR database. Through that link, our filings are available as soon as reasonably practical after we file the documents.

     These filings are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the public may read and copy any materials that we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 and may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

     Our Corporate Governance Policies, the charter of our Audit Committee and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy, along with any amendments or waivers to the Code, are available on our website under the “Investor Relations” link. We will provide a copy of these documents without charge to any stockholder upon receipt of a written request addressed to MGM MIRAGE, Attn: Corporate Secretary, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109.

     Reference in this document to our website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the website.

     You should be aware that the occurrence of any of the events described in this section and elsewhere in this report or in any other of our filings with the SEC could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In evaluating us, you should consider carefully, among other things, the risks described below.

     None.

     Our principal executive offices are located at Bellagio. The following table lists our significant land holdings. Unless otherwise indicated, all properties are wholly-owned. We also own or lease various other improved and unimproved property in Las Vegas and other locations in the United States and certain foreign countries.

     Borgata occupies approximately 46 acres at Renaissance Pointe, including 19 acres we lease to Borgata. Borgata owns approximately 27 acres which are used as collateral for bank credit facilities in the amount of up to $850 million. As of December 31, 2007, $723 million was outstanding under the bank credit facility.

     MGM Grand Macau occupies an approximately 10 acre site which it possesses under a 25 year land use right agreement with the Macau government. MGM Grand Paradise Limited’s interest in the land use right agreement is used as collateral for MGM Grand Paradise Limited’s bank credit facility. As of December 31, 2007, approximately $700 million was outstanding under the bank credit facility.

     Silver Legacy occupies approximately five acres in Reno, Nevada, adjacent to Circus Circus Reno. The site is used as collateral for Silver Legacy’s senior credit facility and 10.125% mortgage notes. As of December 31, 2007, $160 million of principal of the 10.125% mortgage notes were outstanding.

     CityCenter occupies approximately 67 acres of land between Bellagio and Monte Carlo, five acres of which are leased from Bellagio under a long-term lease. We expect that the site will be used as collateral for the permanent CityCenter financing.

     Other than as described above, none of our other assets serve as collateral.

     On June 22, 2007, the Company was served with a purported nationwide class action lawsuit filed in federal district court in Nevada (Lety Ramirez v. MGM MIRAGE, Inc., et al.) for alleged willful violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”). The lawsuit asserts that the Company failed to comply timely with FACTA’s directive that merchants who accept credit and/or debit cards not display more than the last 5 digits of the card number or the card expiration date on electronically-generated receipts provided to customers at the point of sale. FACTA’s compliance deadline for electronic machines that were first put into service before January 1, 2005 was December 4, 2006, while electronic machines put into use on or after January 1, 2005 required immediate compliance.

     Although the complaint does not assert that the plaintiff sustained any actual damage, the plaintiff seeks on behalf of herself and all similarly situated putative class members throughout the United States statutory damages of $100 (minimum) to $1,000 (maximum) for each transaction violation, attorneys’ fees, costs, punitive damages and a permanent injunction.

     By order entered December 3, 2007 the district court denied the Company’s motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety but granted the motion to strike from the complaint plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief. The Company then filed an answer to the complaint on December 20, 2007. No discovery has been propounded on the plaintiff or the Company. On February 11, 2008, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to stay this case pending issuance of a decision by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on review of the order of a California federal district court denying class certification in a FACTA case.

     We believe that plaintiff Ramirez’s claims for class certification and other relief are unjustified, and we will continue to vigorously defend our position in this case.

     We and our subsidiaries are also defendants in various other lawsuits, most of which relate to routine matters incidental to our business. We do not believe that the outcome of this other pending litigation, considered in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company.

     There were no matters submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of 2007.

     Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “MGM” – formerly our stock trading symbol was “MGG.” The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low sale prices of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape.

     There were approximately 3,929 record holders of our common stock as of February 15, 2008.

     We have not paid dividends on our common stock in the last two fiscal years. We intend to retain our earnings to fund the operation of our business, to service and repay our debt, to make strategic investments in high return growth projects at our proven resorts, to repurchase shares of common stock and to reserve our capital to raise our capacity to capture investment opportunities overseas and in emerging domestic markets. Furthermore, as a holding company with no independent operations, our ability to pay dividends will depend upon the receipt of dividends and other payments from our subsidiaries. Our senior credit facility contains financial covenants that could restrict our ability to pay dividends. Our Board of Directors periodically reviews our policy with respect to dividends, and any determination to pay dividends in the future will be at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors.

     Our share repurchases are only conducted under repurchase programs approved by our Board of Directors and publicly announced. The following table includes information about our share repurchases for the quarter ended December 31, 2007:

     In February 2008, we and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dubai World completed a joint tender offer to purchase 15 million shares of our common stock at a price of $80 per share. We purchased 8.5 million shares at a total purchase price of $680 million.

     The following table includes information about our equity compensation plans at December 31, 2007:

          Discontinued Operations

          Acquisitions

          Other

     At December 31, 2007, our operations consisted of 17 wholly-owned casino resorts and 50% investments in four other casino resorts, including:

     Other operations include the Shadow Creek golf course in North Las Vegas; two golf courses south of Primm, Nevada at the California state line; and Fallen Oak golf course in Saucier, Mississippi.

     In April 2007, we closed the sale of the Primm Valley Resorts (Whiskey Pete’s, Buffalo Bill’s and Primm Valley Resort in Primm, Nevada), not including the two golf courses. In June 2007, we closed the sale of the Laughlin Properties (Colorado Belle and Edgewater). See “Results of Operations – Discontinued Operations.” In February 2007, we entered into an agreement to contribute Gold Strike and Nevada Landing (the “Jean Properties”) and surrounding land to a joint venture, and we closed Nevada Landing in March 2007. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Other Factors Affecting Liquidity.”

     We and our joint venture partner are developing CityCenter located on a 67-acre site on the Las Vegas Strip, between Bellagio and Monte Carlo. CityCenter will feature a 4,000-room casino resort designed by world-famous architect Cesar Pelli; two 400-room non-gaming boutique hotels, one of which will be managed by luxury hotelier Mandarin Oriental; approximately 425,000 square feet of retail shops, dining and entertainment venues; and approximately 2.3 million square feet of residential space in approximately 2,700 luxury condominium and condominium-hotel units in multiple towers. CityCenter is expected to open in late 2009.

     In November 2007, we completed a transaction with Dubai World, a Dubai, United Arab Emirates government decree entity, to form a 50/50 joint venture for the CityCenter development. The joint venture, CityCenter Holdings, LLC (“CityCenter”), is owned equally by us and Infinity World Development Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dubai World. We contributed the CityCenter assets which the parties valued at $5.4 billion, subject to certain adjustments. Dubai World contributed cash of $2.96 billion. At the close of the transaction, we received a cash distribution of $2.47 billion, of which $22 million will be repaid to CityCenter as a result of a post-closing adjustment. The joint venture retained approximately $492 million to fund near-term construction costs. We will continue to serve as developer of CityCenter and will receive additional consideration of up to $100 million if the project is completed on time and actual development costs, net of residential proceeds, are within specified parameters. Upon completion of construction, we will manage CityCenter for a fee. We recognized a $1.03 billion pre-tax gain as a result of the transaction.

     We operate primarily in one segment, the operation of casino resorts, which includes offering gaming, hotel, dining, entertainment, retail and other resort amenities. Over half of our net revenue is derived from non-gaming activities, a higher percentage than many of our competitors, as our operating philosophy is to provide a complete resort experience for our guests, including non-gaming amenities which command a premium price based on their quality. Our significant convention and meeting facilities allow us to maximize hotel occupancy and customer volumes during off-peak times such as mid-week or during traditionally slower leisure travel periods, which also leads to better labor utilization. We believe that we own several of the premier casino resorts in the world, and a main focus of our strategy is to continually reinvest in these resorts to maintain our competitive advantage.

     As a resort-based company, our operating results are highly dependent on the volume of customers at our resorts, which in turn impacts the price we can charge for our hotel rooms and other amenities. We also generate a significant portion of our operating income from the high-end gaming customers, which can cause variability in our results. Key performance indicators related to revenue are:

     Most of our revenue is essentially cash-based, through customers wagering with cash or paying for non-gaming services with cash or credit cards. Our resorts, like many in the industry, generate significant operating cash flow. Our industry is capital intensive and we rely heavily on the ability of our resorts to generate operating cash flow to repay debt financing, fund maintenance capital expenditures and provide excess cash for future development.

     We generate a majority of our net revenues and operating income from our resorts in Las Vegas, Nevada, which exposes us to certain risks outside of our control, such as increased competition from new or expanded Las Vegas resorts, and the impact from expansion of gaming in California. We are also exposed to risks related to tourism and the general economy, including national and global economic conditions and terrorist attacks or other global events.

     Our results of operations do not tend to be seasonal in nature, though a variety of factors may affect the results of any interim period, including the timing of major Las Vegas conventions, the amount and timing of marketing and special events for our high-end customers, and the level of play during major holidays, including New Year and Chinese New Year. We market to different customer segments to manage our hotel occupancy, such as targeting large conventions to ensure mid-week occupancy. Our results do not depend on key individual customers, though our success in marketing to customer groups, such as convention customers, or the financial health of customer segments, such as business travelers or high-end gaming customers from a particular country or region, can impact our results.

     We believe that economic conditions in the United States, including the downturn in the housing market and credit concerns, during the latter half of 2007 and into 2008 have had, and could continue to have, a negative impact on our operating results. The impact is currently most noticeable at our mid-market resorts, particularly those outside of Las Vegas. Offsetting these macroeconomic conditions is the continued expected strength of Las Vegas as a tourist destination. We also believe that we will continue to benefit from recent and ongoing strategic capital investments at our resorts. Our Las Vegas Strip resorts require ongoing capital investment to maintain their competitive advantages. We believe these investments in additional non-gaming amenities have enhanced our ability to generate increased visitor volume and allow us to charge premium prices for our amenities. In 2007, we completed many improvements at our Las Vegas strip resorts, including:

     These improvements, along with other amenities and improvements projected to open in 2008, are expected to lead to increased customer volumes in gaming areas, restaurants, shops, entertainment venues and our other resort amenities. In addition, the following items are relevant to our overall outlook:

     Beau Rivage closed in late August 2005 due to significant damage sustained as a result of Hurricane Katrina and re-opened in August 2006. We maintained insurance covering both property damage and business interruption as a result of the storm. The deductible under this coverage was approximately $15 million, based on the amount of damage incurred. Business interruption coverage covered lost profits and other costs incurred during the construction period and up to six months following the reopening of the facility.

     As of December 31, 2007, we had reached final settlement agreements with our insurance carriers and received insurance recoveries of $635 million which exceeded the $265 million of net book value of damaged assets and post-storm costs incurred. All post-storm costs and expected recoveries have been recorded net within “General and administrative” expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income, except for depreciation of non-damaged assets, which is classified as “Depreciation and amortization.” During the year ended December 31, 2007, we recognized $284 million of insurance recoveries in income, of which $217 million was recorded within “Property transactions, net” and $67 million was recorded within “General and administrative expense.” The remaining $86 million previously recognized in income was recorded within “Property transactions, net” in 2006.

     Cash received for insurance recoveries are classified as cash flows from investing activities if the recoveries relate to property damage, and cash flows from operations if the recoveries relate to business interruption. During 2007, we received $280 million in insurance recoveries, of which $207 million was classified as investing cash flows and $73 million was classified as operating cash flows. During 2006, we received $309 million in insurance recoveries, of which $210 million was classified as investing cash flows and $99 million was classified as operating cash flows. During 2005, we received $46 million in insurance recoveries, all of which was classified as investing cash flows.

     The following table summarizes our financial results:

     References to same-store results in our analysis for 2006 compared to 2005 exclude the resorts acquired in our April 25, 2005 acquisition of Mandalay Resort Group (“Mandalay”), Monte Carlo and Beau Rivage. We owned 50% of Monte Carlo prior to the Mandalay acquisition. On a consolidated basis, the most important factors and trends contributing to our performance over the last three years have been:

     The following table includes key information about our operating results:

     Net revenues in 2007 included a full year of results for Beau Rivage. Excluding Beau Rivage, net revenues increased 4%, largely due to strength in hotel room rates and other non-gaming revenues. Operating income increased 63% in 2007 over 2006 and included the CityCenter gain, higher Hurricane Katrina insurance recoveries income, and a full year of operations at Beau Rivage. These increases were partially offset by lower profits recognized from the sale of units at The Signature at MGM Grand and higher preopening expenses, primarily related to the openings of MGM Grand Macau and MGM Grand Detroit. Excluding the impact from these items, operating income for 2007 decreased approximately 5% compared to 2006 mainly related to higher depreciation and amortization expense related to our continued capital investments and higher corporate expense. Corporate expense increased 20% in 2007 over 2006. The increase in corporate expense is partially due to severance costs, costs associated with our CityCenter joint venture transaction, and development costs associated with our planned MGM Grand Atlantic City project.

     The 2006 and 2005 increase in net revenues resulted primarily from the addition of Mandalay. Net revenues for 2006 included a full year of operations for Mandalay resorts and 2005 included approximately 8 months of operations for Mandalay resorts. On a same-store basis, net revenues increased 5% in 2006. Operating income for 2006 increased 32% over 2005; same store operating income increased 15%, partially due to the increases in revenues discussed above with continued strong operating margins. In addition, we recognized income of $102 million from our share of profits from The Signature at MGM Grand along with a $15 million gain on land contributed to the venture. Partially offsetting these items was the $70 million of incremental stock-based compensation expense. Excluding these items, same store operating income increased 10%, with an operating margin of 22% in 2006 compared to 21% in 2005. Corporate expense increased 24%, almost entirely due to $30 million of stock-based compensation.

     The following table presents detail of our net revenues:

     Table games revenue decreased 7% in 2007 excluding Beau Rivage, as volumes were essentially flat. The table games hold percentage was slightly lower in 2007, though in the normal range for both years. In 2006, table games revenue increased 7% over 2005 on a same store basis, with strong baccarat volume – up 4% – and a somewhat higher hold percentage, but within the normal range in both periods.

     Excluding Beau Rivage, slots revenue was flat in 2007. Slots revenue was strong at many of our Las Vegas Strip Resorts, including Bellagio and MGM Grand Las Vegas – each up 8% – and The Mirage and Mandalay Bay – each up 5%. These increases in slot revenues at our high-end Las Vegas Strip resorts were offset by lower revenues at our mid-market resorts. In 2006, slots revenue increased 3% on a same store basis, as a result of increases at MGM Grand Las Vegas and TI.

     Hotel revenue increased 5% in 2007 excluding Beau Rivage, with a 7% increase in company–wide REVPAR. Strength in demand and room pricing on the Las Vegas Strip led to a 5% increase in ADR and a slight increase in occupancy percentage to 93%. In 2006, hotel revenue increased 4% over 2006 on a same-store basis, due to strong room pricing, leading to a 7% increase in same-store REVPAR.

     The increases in food and beverage revenue in 2007 and 2006 are the result of investments in new restaurants and nightclubs. In particular, in 2007 we opened several new outlets at Excalibur, Mandalay Bay and Luxor – including the LAX nightclub. Also, we opened several restaurants and the Jet nightclub at The Mirage throughout 2006. The strength in the business travel segment has also contributed to revenue growth at many of our high-end restaurants and in catering operations.

     Entertainment revenues in 2007 and 2006 benefited from Love, the Beatles-themed Cirque du Soleil show at The Mirage, which opened July 2006. In addition, in 2007 we saw improved results in our production shows generally, with higher occupancy at several shows compared to 2006.

     In 2007, we generated 58% of net revenues from non-gaming activities compared to 56% in 2006 and 55% in 2005. We expect this trend to continue in 2008, as we continue to invest in new non-gaming amenities at our resorts and the MGM Grand Detroit hotel will be open for a full year.

     Stock compensation expense is recorded within the department of the recipient of the stock compensation award. In periods prior to January 1, 2006, such expense consisted only of restricted stock amortization and expense associated with stock options granted to non-employees. Beginning January 1, 2006, stock compensation expense includes the cost of all stock-based awards to employees under SFAS 123(R). The following table shows the amount of incremental compensation related to employee stock-based awards included within each income statement expense caption:

     Preopening and start-up expenses consisted of the following:

     Preopening and start-up expenses for CityCenter will continue to increase as the project nears its expected completion in late 2009. However, since we completed the CityCenter joint venture transaction in November 2007 we will only recognize our 50% share of these preopening costs in the future. MGM Grand Macau preopening and start-up expenses relate to our share of that venture’s preopening costs. Preopening and start-up expenses for The Signature at MGM Grand relate to our costs associated with preparing the towers for rental operations.

     Property transactions, net consisted of the following:

     Write-downs and impairments in 2007 included write-offs related to discontinued construction projects and a write-off of the carrying value of the Nevada Landing building assets due to its closure in March 2007. The 2007 period also includes demolition costs primarily related to the Mandalay Bay room remodel.

     Write-downs and impairments in 2006 included $22 million related to the write-off of the tram connecting Bellagio and Monte Carlo, including the stations at both resorts, in preparation for construction of CityCenter. Other impairments related to assets being replaced in connection with several capital projects, as well as the $4 million write-off of Luxor’s investment in the Hairspray show.

     Write-downs and impairments in 2005 related primarily to assets removed from service in connection with capital projects at several resorts. Demolition costs related primarily to room remodel activity at MGM Grand Las Vegas and the new showroom at The Mirage.

     Insurance recoveries in 2007 and 2006 related to the insurance recoveries received related to property damage from Hurricane Katrina in excess of the book value of the damaged assets and post-storm costs incurred.

     The following table summarizes information related to interest on our long-term debt:

     Gross interest costs increased in 2007 compared to 2006 due to higher average debt balances during the year up until the significant reduction in debt in the fourth quarter resulting from the $2.47 billion received upon the close of the CityCenter joint venture transaction and the $1.2 billion received from our sale of common stock to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dubai World. Net interest expense decreased due to increased capitalized interest from the ongoing construction of CityCenter, MGM Grand Detroit, and MGM Grand Macau.

     Interest costs increased in 2006 over 2005 due to higher average outstanding debt resulting from a full year of debt outstanding related to the Mandalay acquisition, incremental borrowings in 2006 to fund capital investments, and a slightly higher average interest rate. Capitalized interest increased in 2006 as we continued to capitalize interest on the CityCenter construction and our investment in MGM Grand Macau. The increase in our weighted average interest rate was due to slightly higher market rates, which affects our variable rate debt.

     The following table summarizes information related to our income taxes:

     The effective tax rate in 2007 was slightly higher than the statutory rate and the prior year rate. The 2007 effective tax rate would have been higher except for the CityCenter gain, which greatly minimized the impact of permanent and other tax items. Additionally in 2007, a benefit for a deduction related to domestic production activities, resulting primarily from the CityCenter transaction, was offset by nondeductible losses from unconsolidated foreign affiliates during the year.

     The effective income tax rate in 2006 benefited from a reversal of tax reserves that were no longer required, primarily due to guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service related to the deductibility of certain complimentaries. The 2006 rate was still higher than the 2005 rate, however, as such reversal was less than the one-time tax benefit recognized in 2005 due to a tax benefit realized from the repatriation of foreign earnings from Australia as a result of the provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004.

     Cash paid for income taxes increased only slightly in 2007 over 2006, despite significantly higher pre-tax income. Since the CityCenter gain was realized in the fourth quarter of 2007, the associated income taxes will be paid in 2008. Cash paid for income taxes increased significantly in 2006 due primarily to the payment of taxes on the gain on Mandalay’s sale of MotorCity Casino, taxable income associated with the sales of units at the Signature at MGM Grand, and an increase in pre-tax income resulting from the Mandalay merger and continued improvements in operating results.

     Our cash flows consisted of the following:

     Trends in our operating cash flows tend to follow trends in our operating income, excluding gains and losses from investing activities and net property transactions, since our business is primarily cash-based. Cash flow from operations decreased 18% in 2007, partially the result of trends in operating income, excluding the CityCenter gain, Katrina-related income and other similar items. In addition, the Company’s net cash outflows related to CityCenter residential sales – construction expenditures and customer deposits – increased by $135 million. Cash flow from operations increased in 2006 over 2005 as a result of higher operating income, offset by higher interest and tax payments – tax payments in particular increased to $369 million in 2006 versus $76 million in 2005.

     At December 31, 2007 and 2006, we held cash and cash equivalents of $412 million and $453 million, respectively. We require a certain amount of cash on hand to operate our resorts. Beyond our cash on hand, we utilize a company-wide cash management system to minimize the amount of cash held in banks. Funds are swept from accounts at our resorts daily into central bank accounts, and excess funds are invested overnight or are used to repay borrowings under our bank credit facilities.

     Capital expenditures consisted of the following:

     The CityCenter proceeds and Hurricane Katrina insurance recoveries were discussed earlier in the “Executive Overview” section. In 2007, we received net proceeds of $579 million from the sale of the Primm Valley Resorts and the Laughlin Properties. Also in 2007, we purchased a $160 million convertible note issued by The M Resort LLC, which is developing a casino resort on Las Vegas Boulevard, 10 miles south of Bellagio. The note is convertible, with certain restrictions, into a 50% equity position in The M Resort LLC. Investments in unconsolidated affiliates in 2006 and 2005 primarily represented investments in MGM Grand Macau.

     We repaid net debt of $1.8 billion in 2007, including $1.2 billion under our senior credit facility. In 2007, we issued $750 million of 7.5% senior notes maturing in 2016 and we repaid the following senior and senior subordinated notes at their scheduled maturity: $710 million of 9.75% senior subordinated notes; $200 million of 6.75% senior notes; and $492.2 million of 10.25% senior subordinated notes.

     In 2007, we received approximately $1.2 billion from the sale of 14.2 million shares of our common stock to Infinity World Investments, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dubai World, at a price of $84 per share. We received $98 million, $89 million and $146 million in proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options in the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

     In 2006, we borrowed net debt of $662 million, due to the level of capital expenditures, share repurchases and investments in unconsolidated affiliates. We repaid at their scheduled maturity our $200 million 6.45% senior notes and our $245 million 7.25% senior notes, and we issued $1.5 billion of senior notes at various times throughout the year, with interest rates ranging from 6.75% to 7.625% and maturities ranging from 2013 to 2017.

     Our primary financing activities in 2005 related to the Mandalay acquisition. The cash purchase price of Mandalay was funded from borrowings under our senior credit facility. We also issued $875 million of fixed rate debt in various issuances.

     In 2005, we repaid at their scheduled maturity two issues of senior notes – $176.4 million of 6.625% senior notes and $300 million of 6.95% senior notes – and redeemed one issue of senior notes due in 2008 – $200 million of 6.875% senior notes. The redemption of the 2008 senior notes resulted in a loss on early retirement of debt of $20 million, which is classified as “Other, net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. In addition, in the second quarter of 2005 we initiated a tender offer for several issuances of Mandalay’s senior notes and senior subordinated notes totaling $1.5 billion. Holders of $155 million of Mandalay’s senior notes and senior subordinated notes redeemed their holdings. Holders of Mandalay’s floating rate convertible senior debentures with a principal amount of $394 million had the right to redeem the debentures for $566 million through June 30, 2005. $388 million of principal of the convertible debentures were tendered for redemption and redeemed for $558 million.

     Our share repurchases are only conducted under repurchase programs approved by our Board of Directors and publicly announced. In December 2007, our Board of Directors approved a 20 million share authorization. At December 31, 2007, we had 18.2 million shares available for repurchase under the December 2007 authorization. Our share repurchase activity was as follows:

  Principal Debt Arrangements

     Our long-term debt consists of publicly held senior and subordinated notes and our senior credit facility. We pay fixed rates of interest ranging from 5.875% to 9.5% on the senior and subordinated notes. We pay variable interest based on LIBOR on our senior credit facility. Our current senior credit facility has a total capacity of $7.0 billion, matures in 2011, and consists of a $4.5 billion revolving credit facility and a $2.5 billion term loan facility. As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately $3.7 billion of available liquidity under our senior credit facility.

     All of our principal debt arrangements are guaranteed by each of our material subsidiaries, excluding MGM Grand Detroit, LLC and our foreign subsidiaries. MGM Grand Detroit is a guarantor under the senior credit facility, but only to the extent that MGM Grand Detroit, LLC borrows under such facilities. At December 31, 2007, the outstanding amount of borrowings related to MGM Grand Detroit, LLC was $361 million. None of our assets serve as collateral for our principal debt arrangements.

  Other Factors Affecting Liquidity

     Taxes on CityCenter gain. In addition to our typical cash tax payments, in the first quarter of 2008 we will make a federal income tax payment of approximately $300 million related to the CityCenter gain.

     Long-term debt payable in 2008. We repaid $180 million of senior notes at maturity in February 2008. We have a total of $196 million in senior notes that we expect to repay at maturity in the third quarter of 2008.

     Tender offer. In February 2008, we and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dubai World completed a joint tender offer for 15 million shares of our common stock at a tender price of $80.00 per share. We purchased 8.5 million shares at a total purchase price of $680 million.

     MGM Grand Atlantic City development. In October 2007, we announced plans for a multi-billion dollar resort complex on our 72-acre site in Atlantic City. The new resort, MGM Grand Atlantic City, is preliminarily estimated to cost approximately $4.5 to $5.0 billion, not including land and associated costs. The proposed resort would include three towers with more than 3,000 total rooms and suites, approximately 5,000 slot machines, 200 table games, 500,000 square-feet of retail, an extensive convention center, and other typical resort amenities.

     Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation. We have entered into a series of agreements to implement a strategic alliance with the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation (“MPTN”), which owns and operates Foxwoods Casino Resort in Ledyard, Connecticut. Under the strategic alliance, we are consulting with MPTN in the development of a new $700 million casino resort currently under construction adjacent to the existing Foxwoods casino resort. The new resort will utilize the “MGM Grand” brand name and is scheduled to open in Spring 2008. We have also formed a jointly owned company with MPTN — Unity Gaming, LLC — to acquire or develop future gaming and non-gaming enterprises. We will provide a loan of up to $200 million to finance a portion of MPTN’s investment in joint projects.

     Jean Properties. We have entered into an operating agreement to form a 50/50 joint venture with Jeanco Realty Development, LLC. The venture will master plan and develop a mixed-use community in Jean, Nevada. We will contribute the Gold Strike and surrounding land to the joint venture. The value of this contribution per the operating agreement will be $150 million. We expect to receive a distribution of $55 million upon contribution of the assets to the venture, which is subject to the venture obtaining necessary regulatory and other approvals, and $20 million no later than August 2008.

  Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

     Investments in unconsolidated affiliates. Our off balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of investments in unconsolidated affiliates, which currently consist primarily of our investments in CityCenter, Borgata, Grand Victoria, Silver Legacy and MGM Grand Macau. We have not entered into any transactions with special purpose entities, nor have we engaged in any derivative transactions. Our unconsolidated affiliate investments allow us to realize the proportionate benefits of owning a full-scale resort in a manner that minimizes our initial investment. We have not historically guaranteed financing obtained by our investees, and there are no other provisions of the venture agreements which we believe are unusual or subject us to risks to which we would not be subjected if we had full ownership of the resort.

     CityCenter. The estimated net project budget for CityCenter is $8.0 billion, after net residential proceeds of $2.7 billion. The gross project budget consists of $8.7 billion of construction costs, including capitalized interest, $1.7 billion of land, $0.2 billion of preopening expenses, and $0.1 billion of intangible assets. The construction costs, land and intangible assets reflect the impact of $1.3 billion of positive valuation adjustments upon the contribution of the CityCenter assets to the joint venture.

     The joint venture expects to spend approximately $2.5 billion in construction costs in 2008. As of December 31, 2007, the joint venture had $207 million of cash. In February 2008, MGM MIRAGE and Dubai World each loaned $100 million to the joint venture to fund near-term construction costs. The joint venture is currently negotiating with its lenders to obtain project financing to fund remaining construction spending. The joint venture anticipates that project financing will include requirements to utilize the project assets as security for the financing. The other potential source of project financing is additional contributions from MGM MIRAGE and Dubai World, which require approval of the joint venture’s Board of Directors.

     Letters of credit. At December 31, 2007, we had outstanding letters of credit totaling $85 million, of which $50 million support bonds issued by the Economic Development Corporation of the City of Detroit. These bonds are recorded as a liability in our consolidated balance sheets. This obligation was undertaken to secure our right to develop a permanent casino in Detroit.

  Commitments and Contractual Obligations

     The following table summarizes our scheduled contractual commitments as of December 31, 2007:

  Summary of Expected Sources and Uses of Funds

     We plan to fund our contractual obligations and other estimated spending through a combination of operating cash flow, available borrowings under our senior credit facility and potential issuances of fixed rate long-term debt. We generated over $1.0 billion in operating cash flow in 2007, which included deductions for interest payments, tax payments and certain contractually committed payments reflected in the above table, including operating leases, employment agreements and entertainment agreements.

     Management’s discussion and analysis of our results of operations and liquidity and capital resources are based on our consolidated financial statements. To prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, we must make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. We regularly evaluate these estimates and assumptions, particularly in areas we consider to be critical accounting estimates, where changes in the estimates and assumptions could have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Senior management and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors have reviewed the disclosures included herein about our critical accounting estimates, and have reviewed the processes to determine those estimates.

  Allowance for Doubtful Casino Accounts Receivable

     Marker play represents a significant portion of the table games volume at Bellagio, MGM Grand Las Vegas, Mandalay Bay and The Mirage. Our other facilities do not emphasize marker play to the same extent, although we offer markers to customers at those casinos as well.

     We maintain strict controls over the issuance of markers and aggressively pursue collection from those customers who fail to pay their marker balances timely. These collection efforts are similar to those used by most large corporations when dealing with overdue customer accounts, including the mailing of statements and delinquency notices, personal contacts, the use of outside collection agencies and civil litigation. Markers are generally legally enforceable instruments in the United States. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately 47% and 48%, respectively, of our casino accounts receivable was owed by customers from the United States. Markers are not legally enforceable instruments in some foreign countries, but the United States assets of foreign customers may be reached to satisfy judgments entered in the United States. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, approximately 38% and 37%, respectively, of our casino accounts receivable was owed by customers from the Far East.

     We maintain an allowance, or reserve, for doubtful casino accounts at all of our operating casino resorts. The provision for doubtful accounts, an operating expense, increases the allowance for doubtful accounts. We regularly evaluate the allowance for doubtful casino accounts. At resorts where marker play is not significant, the allowance is generally established by applying standard reserve percentages to aged account balances. At resorts where marker play is significant, we apply standard reserve percentages to aged account balances under a specified dollar amount and specifically analyze the collectibility of each account with a balance over the specified dollar amount, based on the age of the account, the customer’s financial condition, collection history and any other known information. We also monitor regional and global economic conditions and forecasts to determine if reserve levels are adequate.

     The collectibility of unpaid markers is affected by a number of factors, including changes in currency exchange rates and economic conditions in the customers’ home countries. Because individual customer account balances can be significant, the allowance and the provision can change significantly between periods, as information about a certain customer becomes known or as changes in a region’s economy occur.

     The following table shows key statistics related to our casino receivables:

     The allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of casino accounts receivable has decreased in the current year due to a decrease in aging of accounts. At December 31, 2007, a 100 basis-point change in the allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of casino accounts receivable would change net income by $2.7 million, or less than $0.01 per share.

  Fixed asset capitalization and depreciation policies

     Property and equipment are stated at cost. For the majority of our property and equipment, cost has been determined based on estimated fair values in connection with the April 2005 Mandalay acquisition and the May 2000 Mirage Resorts acquisition. Maintenance and repairs that neither materially add to the value of the property nor appreciably prolong its life are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. We account for construction projects in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 67, “Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of Real Estate Projects.” When we construct assets, we capitalize direct costs of the project, including fees paid to architects and contractors, property taxes, and certain costs of our design and construction subsidiaries.

     We must make estimates and assumptions when accounting for capital expenditures. Whether an expenditure is considered a maintenance expense or a capital asset is a matter of judgment. When constructing or purchasing assets, we must determine whether existing assets are being replaced or otherwise impaired, which also may be a matter of judgment. Our depreciation expense is highly dependent on the assumptions we make about our assets’ estimated useful lives. We determine the estimated useful lives based on our experience with similar assets, engineering studies, and our estimate of the usage of the asset. Whenever events or circumstances occur which change the estimated useful life of an asset, we account for the change prospectively.

     In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 34, “Capitalization of Interest Cost” (“SFAS 34”), interest cost associated with major development and construction projects is capitalized as part of the cost of the project. Interest is typically capitalized on amounts expended on the project using the weighted-average cost of our outstanding borrowings, since we typically do not borrow funds directly related to a development project. Capitalization of interest starts when construction activities, as defined in SFAS 34, begin and ceases when construction is substantially complete or development activity is suspended for more than a brief period.

  Impairment of Long-lived Assets

     We evaluate our property and equipment and other long-lived assets for impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” For assets to be disposed of, we recognize the asset at the lower of carrying value or fair market value less costs of disposal, as estimated based on comparable asset sales, offers received, or a discounted cash flow model. For assets to be held and used, we review for impairment whenever indicators of impairment exist. We then compare the estimated future cash flows of the asset, on an undiscounted basis, to the carrying value of the asset. If the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying value, no impairment is indicated. If the undiscounted cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, then an impairment is recorded based on the fair value of the asset, typically measured using a discounted cash flow model. If an asset is still under development, future cash flows include remaining construction costs. All recognized impairment losses, whether for assets to be disposed of or assets to be held and used, are recorded as operating expenses.

     There are several estimates, assumptions and decisions in measuring impairments of long-lived assets. First, management must determine the usage of the asset. To the extent management decides that an asset will be sold, it is more likely that an impairment may be recognized. Assets must be tested at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist. This means that some assets must be grouped, and management has some discretion in the grouping of assets. Future cash flow estimates are, by their nature, subjective and actual results may differ materially from our estimates.

     On a quarterly basis, we review our major long-lived assets to determine if events have occurred or circumstances exist that indicate a potential impairment. We estimate future cash flows using our internal budgets. When appropriate, we discount future cash flows using our weighted-average cost of capital, developed using a standard capital asset pricing model.

     See “Results of Operations” for discussion of write-downs and impairments recorded in 2007, 2006 and 2005. In 2006, we entered into agreements to sell Primm Valley Resorts and Laughlin Properties. The fair value less costs to sell exceeded the carrying value, therefore no impairment was indicated. Other than the above items, we are not aware of events or circumstances through December 31, 2007 that would cause us to review any material long-lived assets for impairment.

  Income taxes

     We account for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”). SFAS 109 requires the recognition of deferred tax assets, net of applicable reserves, related to net operating loss carryforwards and certain temporary differences. The standard requires recognition of a future tax benefit to the extent that realization of such benefit is more likely than not. Otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied. Except for certain New Jersey state net operating losses, certain other New Jersey state deferred tax assets, a foreign tax credit carryforward and certain foreign deferred tax assets, we believe that it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets are fully realizable because of the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences and future projected taxable income.

     Our income tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other tax authorities. While positions taken in tax returns are sometimes subject to uncertainty in the tax laws, we do not take such positions unless we have “substantial authority” to do so under the Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations. We may take positions on our tax returns based on substantial authority that are not ultimately accepted by the IRS.

     Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 requires that tax positions be assessed using a two-step process. A tax position is recognized if it meets a “more likely than not” threshold, and is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized. As required by the standard, we review uncertain tax positions at each balance sheet date. Liabilities we record as a result of this analysis are recorded separately from any current or deferred income tax accounts, and are classified as current (“Other accrued liabilities”) or long-term (“Other long-term liabilities”) based on the time until expected payment. Additionally, we recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense, a policy that did not change as a result of the adoption of FIN 48.

     We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state and local jurisdictions, and foreign jurisdictions, although the taxes paid in foreign jurisdictions are not material. We are no longer subject to examination of our U.S. federal income tax returns filed for years ended prior to 2003. While the IRS examination of the 2001 and 2002 tax years closed during the first quarter of 2007, the statute of limitations for assessing tax for such years has been extended in order for us to complete the appeals process for issues that were not agreed upon at the closure of the examination. It is reasonably possible that this appeal may be settled in the next 12 months. The IRS is currently examining our federal income tax returns for the 2003 and 2004 tax years. Tax returns for subsequent years are also subject to examination.

     We are no longer subject to examination of our various state and local tax returns filed for years ended prior to 2003. During 2007, the City of Detroit initiated an examination of a Mandalay Resort Group subsidiary return for the pre-acquisition year ended April 25, 2005. Also during 2007, the state of Mississippi initiated an examination of returns filed by subsidiaries of MGM MIRAGE and Mandalay Resort Group for the 2004 through 2006 tax years. This audit was settled during the first quarter of 2008, with no material impact to us. No other state or local income tax returns are under examination.

  Stock-based Compensation

     We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123(R). We measure fair value of share-based awards using the Black-Scholes model. There are several management assumptions required to determine the inputs into the Black-Scholes model. Our volatility and expected term assumptions can significantly impact the fair value of stock-based awards. The extent of the impact will depend, in part, on the extent of stock-based awards in any given year. In 2007, we granted 2.6 million stock appreciation rights with a total fair value of $68 million. In 2006, we granted 1.9 million stock options and stock appreciation rights with a total fair value of $28 million.

     For 2007 awards, a 10% change in the volatility assumption (32% for 2007; for sensitivity analysis, volatility was assumed to be 29% and 35%) would have resulted in a $4.6 million, or 7%, change in fair value. A 10% change in the expected term assumption (4.1 years for 2007; for sensitivity analysis, expected term was assumed to be 3.7 years and 4.5 years) would have resulted in a $3.8 million, or 6%, change in fair value. These changes in fair value would have been recognized over the five-year vesting period of such awards. It should be noted that a change in the expected term would cause other changes, since the risk-free rate and volatility assumptions are specific to the term; we did not attempt to adjust those assumptions in performing the sensitivity analysis above.

  Business Combinations

     We account for business combinations in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, “Accounting for Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” and related interpretations. SFAS 141 requires that we record the net assets of acquired businesses at fair value, and we must make estimates and assumptions to determine the fair value of these acquired assets and assumed liabilities.

     The determination of the fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities in the Mandalay acquisition required us to make certain fair value estimates, primarily related to land, property and equipment and intangible assets. These estimates require significant judgment and include a variety of assumptions in determining the fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities, including market data, estimated future cash flows, growth rates, current replacement cost for similar capacity for certain fixed assets, market rate assumptions for contractual obligations and settlement plans for contingencies and liabilities.

  Accounting for Business Combinations and Non-Controlling Interests

     In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141 (R), “Business Combinations,” (“SFAS 141R”) and SFAS No. 160 “Non-controlling interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51,” (“SFAS 160”). These standards amend the requirements for accounting for business combinations, including the recognition and measurement of additional assets and liabilities at their fair value, expensing of acquisition-related costs which are currently capitalizable under existing rules, treatment of adjustments to deferred taxes and liabilities subsequent to the measure period, and the measurement of non-controlling interest, previously commonly referred to as minority interests, at fair value. SFAS 141R also includes additional disclosure requirements with respect to the methodologies and techniques used to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities recognized in a business combination. SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 apply prospectively to fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, except for the treatment of deferred tax adjustments which apply to deferred taxes recognized in previous business combinations. These standards will become effective for us on January 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the effect, if any, the adoption of SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

  Impact of Buy-Sell Clauses on Sales of Real Estate

     In December 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) of the FASB ratified its consensus on EITF No. 07-6 “Accounting for the Sale of Real Estate Subject to the Requirements of FASB Statement No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, When the Agreement Includes a Buy-Sell Clause.” The EITF reached consensus that a buy-sell clause, in and of itself, does not constitute a prohibited form of continuing involvement that would preclude partial sale-recognition under Statement 66. This EITF is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, or for us January 1, 2008. The adoption of EITF No. 07-6 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

  Fair Value and Fair Value Option

      In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits the measure of certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and establishes presentation and disclosure requirements to help financial statement users to understand these measurements and their impact on earnings. This statement is effective for us beginning in January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 159 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

     In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), SFAS 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and expands fair value disclosures. This statement will be effective for us beginning January 1, 2008 for financial assets and liabilities and beginning January 1, 2009 for certain non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

     Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our long-term debt. We attempt to limit our exposure to interest rate risk by managing the mix of our long-term fixed rate borrowings and short-term borrowings under our bank credit facilities.

     As of December 31, 2007, long-term fixed rate borrowings represented approximately 71% of our total borrowings. Based on December 31, 2007 debt levels, an assumed 100 basis-point change in LIBOR would cause our annual interest cost to change by approximately $3 million.

     We incorporate by reference the information appearing under “Market Risk” in Item 7 of this Form 10-K.

     Our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, including the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Report thereon, referred to in Item 15(a)(1) of this Form 10-K, are included at pages 42 to 68 of this Form 10-K.

     None.

     Our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) have concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2007. This conclusion is based on an evaluation conducted under the supervision and with the participation of Company management. Disclosure controls and procedures are those controls and procedures which ensure that information required to be disclosed in this filing is accumulated and communicated to management and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner and in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations.

     Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, referred to in Item 15(a)(1) of this Form 10-K, is included at page 40 of this Form 10-K.

     The Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm’s Attestation Report on our internal control over financial reporting referred to in Item 15(a)(1) of this Form 10-K, is included at page 41 of this Form 10-K.

     During the quarter ended December 31, 2007, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

     None.

     We incorporate by reference the information appearing under “Executive Officers of the Registrant” in Item 1 of this Form 10-K and under “Election of Directors” and “Corporate Governance” in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we expect to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about April 14, 2008 (the “Proxy Statement”).

     We incorporate by reference the information appearing under “Executive and Director Compensation and Other Information” and “Corporate Governance — Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” and “Compensation Committee Report” in the Proxy Statement.

     We incorporate by reference the information appearing under “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in Item 5 of this Form 10-K, and under “Principal Stockholders” and “Election of Directors” in the Proxy Statement.

     We incorporate by reference the information appearing under “Transactions with Related Persons” and “Corporate Governance” in the Proxy Statement.

     We incorporate by reference the information appearing under “Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement.

     (a)(1). Financial Statements.

     (a)(2). Financial Statement Schedule.

     We have omitted schedules other than the one listed above because they are not required or are not applicable, or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes to the financial statements.

     (a)(3). Exhibits.