MGM Resorts - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

(Mark One)

(Address of principal executive offices — Zip Code)

(702) 693-7120

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ    Accelerated filer o    Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act): Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

     Organization. MGM MIRAGE (the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation, incorporated on January 29, 1986. As of June 30, 2006, approximately 56% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock were owned by Tracinda Corporation, a Nevada corporation wholly owned by Kirk Kerkorian. MGM MIRAGE acts largely as a holding company and, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, owns and/or operates casino resorts. On April 25, 2005, the Company completed its merger with Mandalay Resort Group (“Mandalay”) – see Note 2.

     The Company owns and operates the following casino resorts in Las Vegas, Nevada: Bellagio, MGM Grand Las Vegas, Mandalay Bay, The Mirage, Luxor, Treasure Island (“TI”), New York-New York, Excalibur, Monte Carlo, Circus Circus Las Vegas and Slots-A-Fun. Boardwalk was closed in January 2006 in preparation for Project CityCenter (see below). The Company owns three resorts in Primm, Nevada, at the California/Nevada state line – Whiskey Pete’s, Buffalo Bill’s and the Primm Valley Resort – as well as two championship golf courses located near the resorts. Other Nevada operations include Circus Circus Reno, Colorado Belle and Edgewater in Laughlin, Gold Strike and Nevada Landing in Jean, and Railroad Pass in Henderson. The Company has a 50% investment in Silver Legacy in Reno, which is adjacent to Circus Circus Reno. In addition, the Company owns a 50% interest in the entity developing The Signature at MGM Grand, which is adjacent to MGM Grand Las Vegas. The Signature is a condominium-hotel development, with one tower currently in the closing process and two towers currently under construction. The Company also owns Shadow Creek, an exclusive world-class golf course located approximately ten miles north of its Las Vegas Strip resorts.

     The Company and its local partners own MGM Grand Detroit, LLC, which operates a casino in an interim facility located in downtown Detroit, Michigan. The Company also owns and operates two resorts in Mississippi – Beau Rivage in Biloxi and Gold Strike Tunica. Beau Rivage sustained significant damage in late August 2005 as a result of Hurricane Katrina and has been closed since. The Company expects to reopen Beau Rivage in stages beginning in the third quarter of 2006. The Company has 50% interests in two resorts outside of Nevada – Borgata and Grand Victoria. Borgata is a casino resort located on Renaissance Point in the Marina area of Atlantic City, New Jersey. Boyd Gaming Corporation owns the other 50% of Borgata and also operates the resort. The Company owns additional land adjacent to Borgata, a portion of which consists of common roads, landscaping and master plan improvements, a portion of which is being utilized for an expansion of Borgata, and a portion of which is available for future development. Grand Victoria is a riverboat in Elgin, Illinois – an affiliate of Hyatt Gaming owns the other 50% of Grand Victoria and also operates the resort.

     The Company owns 50% of MGM Grand Paradise Limited, a joint venture with Pansy Ho Chiu-king formed to develop, build and operate a hotel-casino resort, MGM Grand Macau, in Macau S.A.R. MGM Grand Macau is estimated to cost approximately $1.1 billion, including land and license rights and preopening costs, and the resort is anticipated to open in late 2007.

     The Company owns 66 acres adjacent to Bellagio on which it is developing Project CityCenter. Project CityCenter will feature a 4,000-room casino resort designed by world-famous architect Cesar Pelli; two 400-room non-gaming boutique hotels, one of which will be managed by luxury hotelier Mandarin Oriental; approximately 470,000 square feet of retail shops, dining and entertainment venues; and approximately 2.3 million square feet of residential space in approximately 2,800 luxury condominium and condominium-hotel units in multiple towers. The overall cost of Project CityCenter is estimated at approximately $7 billion, excluding preopening and land costs. After estimated proceeds of $2.5 billion from the sale of residential units, net project cost is estimated at approximately $4.5 billion. Project CityCenter is expected to open in late 2009.

     Basis of presentation. As permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s 2005 annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

     In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments — which include only normal recurring adjustments — necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2006, the results of its operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. The results of operations for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Certain reclassifications, which have no effect on previously reported net income, have been made to the 2005 financial statements to conform to the 2006 presentation.

     Point-loyalty programs. The Company operates two primary point-loyalty programs — Players Club and One Club. One Club is the point-loyalty program at Mandalay resorts, and that program will be phased out in 2006 and 2007, with customers transferred into Players Club.

     In Players Club, customers earn points based on their slots play, which can be redeemed for cash. The Company records a liability based on the points earned times the redemption value and records a corresponding reduction in casino revenue since the awards earned are cash. The expiration of unused points results in a reduction of the liability. Customers’ overall level of table games and slots play is also tracked and used by management in awarding discretionary complimentaries – free rooms, food and beverage and other services – for which no accrual is recorded.

     In One Club, customers earn points based on both their slots and table games play, with slots play contributing to a points balance which can be redeemed for cash and both table games and slots play contributing to a points balance which can be redeemed for complimentaries. The Company records a liability based on the points earned times the redemption value. For cash points, the redemption value is the cash value, and the offsetting entry is a reduction in casino revenue. For complimentaries points, the redemption value is based on the average departmental cost of the free rooms, food and beverage and other services and estimated redemption patterns, and the offsetting entry is a casino operating expense. The expiration of unused points results in a reduction of the liability.

     Financial statement impact of Hurricane Katrina. The Company maintains insurance covering both property damage and business interruption as a result of wind and flood damage sustained at Beau Rivage. The deductible under this coverage is $15 million, based on the amount of damage incurred. Based on current estimates, insurance proceeds are expected to exceed the net book value of damaged assets and clean-up and demolition costs; therefore, the Company has not recorded an impairment charge related to the storm and upon ultimate settlement of the claim will likely record a gain. Damaged assets with a net book value of $126 million have been written off, clean-up and demolition costs of $34 million have been incurred, and a corresponding insurance receivable has been recorded.

     Business interruption coverage covers lost profits and other costs incurred during the construction period and up to six months following the re-opening of the facility. Expected costs during the interruption period are less than the anticipated business interruption proceeds; therefore, post-storm costs of $77 million through June 30, 2006 are being offset by the expected recoveries and a corresponding insurance receivable has been recorded. Post-storm costs and expected recoveries are recorded net within “General and administrative” expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income, except for depreciation of non-damaged assets, which is classified as “Depreciation and amortization.”

     The insurance receivable is recorded within “Deposits and other assets, net” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Through June 30, 2006, the Company has received $163 million from its insurers, leaving a net receivable of $74 million at June 30, 2006. Insurance proceeds are classified in the statement of cash flows based on the coverage the proceeds relate to; however, the Company’s insurance policy includes undifferentiated coverage for both property damage and business interruption. The Company treated proceeds as being related to property damage, and therefore classified the proceeds as an investing cash flow, until the full $160 million of damaged assets and demolition costs were recovered. The Company is treating subsequent proceeds up to the amount of the recorded receivable as being related to business interruption, and therefore classifying these proceeds as an operating cash flow. Proceeds in excess of the recorded receivable will be segregated between property damage and business interruption based on the ultimate negotiation and resolution of the claim.

     Real estate under development. Real estate under development represents capitalized costs of wholly-owned real estate projects to be sold, which consists entirely of condominium and condominium-hotel developments. Real estate under development includes land, direct construction and development costs, property taxes, interest and direct selling costs. Indirect selling costs are expensed as incurred. Substantially all of the balance in real estate under development at June 30, 2006 represents the cost balance of land upon which development of condominium or condominium-hotel towers began in the first quarter of 2006.

     On April 25, 2005, the Company closed its merger with Mandalay under which the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common stock of Mandalay for $71 in cash for each share of Mandalay’s common stock. The acquisition expands the Company’s portfolio of resorts on the Las Vegas Strip, provides additional sites for future development and expands the Company’s employee and customer bases significantly. These factors result in the recognition of certain intangible assets, discussed below, and significant goodwill. The total merger consideration included (in thousands):

     Cash paid, net of cash acquired, was $4.4 billion. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase and, accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the underlying assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair values.

     The following table sets forth the allocation of purchase price (in thousands):

     The amount allocated to intangible assets includes existing Mandalay intangible assets and the recognition of customer relationships with a value of $12 million and an estimated useful life of five years and trade names and trademarks with a value of $234 million and an indefinite life. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized.

     The operating results for Mandalay are included in the accompanying consolidated statements of income from the date of the acquisition. The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information for the Company has been prepared assuming the Mandalay acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2005.

     Investments in unconsolidated affiliates consisted of the following:

     The Company’s investment in MGM Grand Paradise Limited consists of equity and subordinated debt. The Company is committed to loaning the venture up to an additional $45 million, which will be treated as an additional investment in the venture.

     The negative investment balance in The Signature at MGM Grand at December 31, 2005, represented cumulative losses of the venture, and was classified as “Other long-term obligations” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets along with deferred income related to the excess of proceeds received over carrying value of land the Company transferred to the venture. Due to the recognition of profits on a portion of the condominium units of Tower 1, which was completed in May 2006, the investment balance is positive at June 30, 2006 and is classified as “Investments in unconsolidated affiliates” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

     The Company recorded its share of the results of operations of unconsolidated affiliates as follows (including the Company’s share of Monte Carlo’s results in 2005):

     Amounts due within one year of the balance sheet date are classified as long-term in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets because the Company has both the intent and ability to repay these amounts with available borrowings under the senior credit facility.

     Total interest incurred for the three month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $223 million and $174 million, respectively, of which $28 million and $7 million, respectively, was capitalized. Total interest incurred for the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $439 million and $279 million, respectively, of which $46 million and $10 million, respectively, was capitalized.

     At June 30, 2006, the senior credit facility had total capacity of $7.0 billion. The senior credit facility matures in 2010 and consists of a $5.5 billion revolving credit facility and $1.5 billion term loan facility. At June 30, 2006, the Company had approximately $2.5 billion of available borrowing capacity under the senior credit facility.

     In February 2006, the Company repaid the $200 million 6.45% senior notes at their maturity with borrowings under the senior credit facility.

     In April 2006, the Company issued $500 million of 6.75% senior notes due 2013 and $250 million of 6.875% senior notes due 2016, both through a Rule 144A offering. As required by the indenture, the Company has initiated exchange offers to exchange the Rule 144A notes for notes registered under the Securities Act of 1933. The proceeds were used to repay outstanding borrowings under the senior credit facility.

     In the 2005 six month period, the Company recorded a net $19 million loss on early retirement of debt, classified as “Other, net” in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The February 2005 redemption of the Company’s 6.875% senior notes due February 2008 resulted in a loss of $20 million. The May 2005 tender offer for several issuances of Mandalay’s senior notes resulted in a net gain of $1 million.

     The Company’s long-term debt obligations contain customary covenants requiring the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. At June 30, 2006, the Company was required to maintain a maximum leverage ratio (debt to EBITDA, as defined) of 6.75:1 and a maximum senior leverage ratio of 5.75:1. Also at June 30, 2006, the Company was required to maintain a minimum coverage ratio (EBITDA to interest charges, as defined) of 2.0:1. At June 30, 2006, the Company’s leverage, senior leverage and interest coverage ratios were 5.4:1, 4.5:1 and 2.7:1, respectively.

     The weighted-average number of common and common equivalent shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share consisted of the following:

     Comprehensive income consisted of the following:

     Stock repurchases. In the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company repurchased 3.5 million shares of common stock at a total cost of $141 million, leaving 11 million shares available under a July 2004 authorization. The Company did not repurchase any shares in the six months ended June 30, 2005.

     Adoption of SFAS 123(R). Effective January 1, 2006, the Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). The Company previously accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25,” and disclosed supplemental information in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”). Under these standards, the Company did not incur compensation expense for employee stock options when the exercise price was at least 100% of the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. SFAS 123(R) requires that all stock-based compensation, including shares and share-based awards to employees, be valued at fair value. The Company measures fair value of share-based awards using the Black-Scholes model.

     Under SFAS 123(R), compensation is attributed to the periods of associated service. For awards granted prior to January 1, 2006, such expense is being recognized on an accelerated basis since that is the method the Company previously applied in its supplemental disclosures. Beginning with awards granted on January 1, 2006, such expense is being recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the awards. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant, with such estimate updated periodically and with actual forfeitures recognized currently to the extent they differ from the estimate.

     The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) by applying the modified-prospective transition method. Under this method, the Company began applying the valuation and other criteria of SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006, and began recognizing expense for the unvested portion of previously issued grants at the same time, based on the valuation and attribution methods originally used to calculate the disclosures.

     The impact of adopting SFAS 123(R) was as follows, due to the incremental compensation cost recognized for employee stock options and stock appreciation rights:

     In addition, SFAS 123(R) requires the excess tax benefits from stock option exercises – tax deductions in excess of compensation cost recognized – to be classified as a financing activity. Previously, all tax benefits from stock option exercises were classified as operating activities. Had the Company not adopted SFAS 123(R), the $18 million of excess tax benefits classified as a financing cash inflow would have been classified as an operating cash inflow.

     Information about the Company’s share-based awards. The Company adopted an omnibus incentive plan in 2005 which allows for the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and other stock-based awards to eligible directors, officers and employees. The plans are administered by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors. Salaried officers, directors and other key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries are eligible to receive awards. The Committee has discretion under the omnibus plan regarding which type of awards to grant, the vesting and service requirements, exercise price and other conditions, in all cases subject to certain limits, including:

     To date, the Committee has only awarded stock options and stock appreciation rights under the omnibus plan. The Company’s practice has been to issue new shares upon the exercise of stock options. Under the Company’s previous plans, the Committee had issued stock options and restricted stock. Stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under all plans generally have either 7-year or 10-year terms, and in most cases are exercisable in either four or five equal annual installments. Restrictions on restricted shares granted under a previous plan lapse 50% on the third anniversary date after the grant and 50% on the fourth anniversary date after the grant.

     As of June 30, 2006, the aggregate number of share-based awards available for grant under the omnibus plan was 5.2 million. A summary of activity under the Company’s share-based payment plans for the six months ended June 30, 2006 is presented below:

     The total intrinsic value of stock options and stock appreciation rights exercised during the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $54 million and $161 million, respectively. The total income tax benefits from stock option exercises during the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 were $19 million and $57 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2006, there was a total of $103 million of unamortized compensation related to stock options and stock appreciation rights, which cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.0 years. As noted earlier, the Company is recognizing expense for awards granted prior to January 1, 2006 on an accelerated basis, so a disproportionate share of the unamortized expense will be recognized in the first 12 months of this weighted-average period.

     During the six months ended June 30, 2006, restrictions lapsed with respect to 818,000 shares with a total fair value of $34 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, restrictions lapsed with respect to 840,000 shares with a total fair value of $33 million. In the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, certain recipients of restricted shares elected to use a portion of the shares in which restrictions lapsed to pay required withholding taxes. Approximately 277,000 and 258,000 shares, respectively, were surrendered in the six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of June 30, 2006, there was less than $1 million of unamortized compensation related to restricted stock, all of which will be recognized in 2006.

     Recognition of compensation cost. The following table shows information about compensation cost recognized:

     Compensation cost for stock options and stock appreciation rights was based on the fair value of each award, measured by applying the Black-Scholes model on the date of grant, using the following weighted-average assumptions (assumptions in 2005 were used to compute the pro forma compensation for disclosure purposes only):

     Expected volatility is based in part on historical volatility and in part on implied volatility based on traded options on the Company’s stock. The expected term considers the contractual term of the option as well as historical exercise and forfeiture behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based on the rates in effect on the grant date for US Treasury instruments with maturities matching the relevant expected term of the award.

     Pro forma disclosures. Had the Company accounted for these plans during 2005 under the fair value method allowed by SFAS 123, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to recognize the fair value of employee stock options, as follows:

     New York Racing Association. The Company has entered into a definitive agreement with the New York Racing Association (“NYRA”) to manage video lottery terminals (“VLTs”) at NYRA’s Aqueduct horseracing facility in metropolitan New York. Subject to receipt of requisite New York State approvals, the Company will assist in the development of the facility, including providing project financing up to $190 million, and will manage the facility for a term of five years (extended automatically if the financing provided by the Company is not fully repaid) for a fee. Recent legislative changes will allow the Company to operate the VLTs past the expiration date of the current NYRA franchise agreement.

     United Kingdom. In November 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with Newcastle United PLC to create a 50-50 joint venture which would build a major new mixed-use development, including a regional casino, on a site adjacent to Newcastle United’s football stadium. The Company made an equity investment of £5 million ($9 million based on exchange rates at June 30, 2006). The agreement is cancelable, and the equity investment refundable, if certain conditions are not met within specified time frames, including obtaining a regional casino license and regulatory approvals, and the implementation of an acceptable tax regime.

     The Signature at MGM Grand. In 2004, the venture obtained construction financing for up to $210 million for the development of Tower 1. The Company has provided a guaranty for up to 50% of the interest and principal obligations on the construction financing. The remaining 50% of interest and principal obligations is guaranteed by affiliates of the venture’s other member. These affiliates and the Company have also jointly and severally provided a completion guaranty.

     In 2005, the venture obtained construction financing for up to $230 million for the development of Tower 2. The Company has provided a guaranty for up to 50% of the interest and principal obligations on the construction financing, with such guaranty decreasing by 50% relative to the principal when construction is 50% complete. The remaining 50% of interest and principal obligations is guaranteed by affiliates of the venture’s other investor. These affiliates and the Company have also jointly and severally provided a completion guaranty. At June 30, 2006, the Company had a liability for its guaranty obligations for Towers 1 and 2 of approximately $2 million, classified in “Other long-term obligations” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

     Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation. The Company has agreed to enter a strategic alliance, subject to definitive agreements, with the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation (“MPTN”). The strategic alliance has several elements, one of which calls for the creation of a joint venture to seek future development opportunities. The Company has agreed to provide a development subsidiary of MPTN with a loan of up to $200 million intended to fund a portion of that subsidiary’s investment in any future joint development projects.

     Net property transactions consisted of the following:

     Write-downs and impairments in 2006 includes $22 million related to the write-off of the tram connecting Bellagio and Monte Carlo, including the stations at both resorts, in preparation for construction of Project CityCenter. Project CityCenter will feature a state-of-the-art people mover system that will reconnect Bellagio with Monte Carlo, with the stations at each resort completely redesigned as well. Other write-downs related to assets being replaced in connection with several smaller capital projects, primarily at MGM Grand Las Vegas, Mandalay Bay and The Mirage, as well as the $4 million write-off of Luxor’s investment in the Hairspray show.

     During 2005, demolition costs relate primarily to room remodel activity at MGM Grand Las Vegas and construction of a new showroom at The Mirage.

     The Company’s subsidiaries (excluding MGM Grand Detroit, LLC and certain minor subsidiaries) have fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, payment of the senior credit facility, the senior notes and the senior subordinated notes. Separate condensed financial statement information for the subsidiary guarantors and non-guarantors as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 and for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 is as follows: