MidWestOne Financial Group - 10-Q quarterly report FY2014 Q2

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549




	FORM 10-Q



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to



	Commission file number 001-35968

MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



Iowa	42-1206172
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

102 South Clinton Street

Iowa City, IA 52240

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

319-356-5800

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	x
Non-accelerated filer	o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No

As of July 30, 2014, there were 8,399,414 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, outstanding.

Table of Contents

MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Form 10-Q Quarterly Report

Table of Contents



		Page No.
PART I

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets	1

	Consolidated Statements of Operations	2

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	3

	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity	4

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	5

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	31

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	51

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	54

Part II

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	56

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	56

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	56

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	56

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	56

Item 5.	Other Information	56

Item 6.	Exhibits	57

	Signatures	58

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS



	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	21,527		$	24,516
Interest-bearing deposits in banks	755			374
Cash and cash equivalents	22,282			24,890
Investment securities:
Available for sale	472,136			498,561
Held to maturity (fair value of $41,568 as of June 30, 2014 and $30,191 as of December 31, 2013)	42,697			32,625
Loans held for sale	1,947			357
Loans	1,085,921			1,088,412
Allowance for loan losses	(16,432		)	(16,179		)
Net loans	1,069,489			1,072,233
Loan pool participations, net	21,472			25,533
Premises and equipment, net	32,461			27,682
Accrued interest receivable	9,310			10,409
Intangible assets, net	8,532			8,806
Bank-owned life insurance	30,052			29,598
Other real estate owned	1,820			1,770
Deferred income taxes	3,377			8,194
Other assets	14,332			14,560
Total assets	$	1,729,907		$	1,755,218
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing demand	$	205,388		$	222,359
Interest-bearing checking	578,584			592,673
Savings	103,679			94,559
Certificates of deposit under $100,000	242,096			256,283
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over	217,905			209,068
Total deposits	1,347,652			1,374,942
Federal funds purchased	4,731			5,482
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	57,293			61,183
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	103,900			106,900
Deferred compensation liability	3,434			3,469
Long-term debt	15,464			15,464
Accrued interest payable	745			765
Other liabilities	10,172			8,997
Total liabilities	1,543,391			1,577,202
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock, no par value; authorized 500,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013	$	—		$	—
Common stock, $1.00 par value; authorized 15,000,000 shares at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013; issued 8,690,398 shares at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013; outstanding 8,396,191 shares at June 30, 2014 and 8,481,799 shares at December 31, 2013	8,690			8,690
Additional paid-in capital	80,323			80,506
Treasury stock at cost, 294,207 shares as of June 30, 2014 and 208,599 shares at December 31, 2013	(5,950		)	(3,702		)
Retained earnings	98,754			91,473
Accumulated other comprehensive income	4,699			1,049
Total shareholders' equity	186,516			178,016
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,729,907		$	1,755,218

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS



(unaudited) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013		2014			2013
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans	$	12,005		$	12,277	$	23,945		$	24,391
Interest and discount on loan pool participations	532			610		812			1,690
Interest on bank deposits	5			1		9			6
Interest on investment securities:
Taxable securities	2,274			2,546		4,590			5,176
Tax-exempt securities	1,360			1,334		2,741			2,695
Total interest income	16,176			16,768		32,097			33,958
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits:
Interest-bearing checking	547			600		1,092			1,271
Savings	36			35		72			71
Certificates of deposit under $100,000	634			1,121		1,331			2,360
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over	449			569		894			1,202
Total interest expense on deposits	1,666			2,325		3,389			4,904
Interest on federal funds purchased	5			18		6			27
Interest on securities sold under agreements to repurchase	29			29		59			65
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	545			705		1,107			1,397
Interest on other borrowings	7			7		13			15
Interest on long-term debt	69			75		141			150
Total interest expense	2,321			3,159		4,715			6,558
Net interest income	13,855			13,609		27,382			27,400
Provision for loan losses	300			600		750			800
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	13,555			13,009		26,632			26,600
Noninterest income:
Trust, investment, and insurance fees	1,430			1,423		2,948			2,772
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts	848			743		1,476			1,450
Mortgage origination and loan servicing fees	318			717		755			1,761
Other service charges, commissions and fees	552			596		1,171			1,168
Bank-owned life insurance income	225			230		454			461
Gain on sale or call of available for sale securities (Includes $191 and $4 reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income for net gains on available for sale securities for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $974 and $84 reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income for net gains on available for sale securities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively)	191			4		974			84
Loss on sale of premises and equipment	(8		)	—		(5		)	(2		)
Total noninterest income	3,556			3,713		7,773			7,694
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits	6,060			6,173		12,194			12,466
Net occupancy and equipment expense	1,634			1,538		3,239			3,226
Professional fees	779			718		1,354			1,401
Data processing expense	391			337		815			728
FDIC insurance expense	240			296		483			590
Amortization of intangible assets	137			166		274			332
Other operating expense	1,398			1,357		2,672			2,836
Total noninterest expense	10,639			10,585		21,031			21,579
Income before income tax expense	6,472			6,137		13,374			12,715
Income tax expense (Includes $74 and $2 income tax expense reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and $380 and $33 income tax expense reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively)	1,719			1,606		3,648			3,394
Net income	$	4,753		$	4,531	$	9,726		$	9,321
Share and per share information:
Ending number of shares outstanding	8,396,191			8,466,471		8,396,191			8,466,471
Average number of shares outstanding	8,428,307			8,474,925		8,451,819			8,484,100
Diluted average number of shares	8,452,291			8,517,292		8,479,989			8,526,961
Earnings per common share - basic	$	0.56		$	0.54	$	1.15		$	1.10
Earnings per common share - diluted	0.56			0.53		1.14			1.09
Dividends paid per common share	0.145			0.125		0.290			0.250

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME



(unaudited) (dollars in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Net income	$	4,753		$	4,531		$	9,726		$	9,321

Other comprehensive income (loss), available for sale securities:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period	2,965			(11,558		)	6,853			(12,968		)
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income	(191		)	(4		)	(974		)	(84		)
Income tax (expense) benefit	(1,052		)	4,317			(2,229		)	4,876
Other comprehensive income (loss) on available for sale securities	1,722			(7,245		)	3,650			(8,176		)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	1,722			(7,245		)	3,650			(8,176		)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	6,475		$	(2,714	)	$	13,376		$	1,145

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY



(unaudited) (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Treasury Stock			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss)			Total
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	—	$	8,690	$	80,383		$	(3,316	)	$	77,125		$	11,050		$	173,932
Net income	—		—		—			—			9,321			—			9,321
Dividends paid on common stock ($0.25 per share)	—		—		—			—			(2,121		)	—			(2,121		)
Stock options exercised (22,193 shares)	—		—		(39		)	143			—			—			104
Release/lapse of restriction on RSUs (19,385 shares)	—		—		(259		)	282			—			—			23
Repurchase of common stock (40,713 shares)	—		—		—			(967		)	—			—			(967		)
Stock compensation	—		—		167			—			—			—			167
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	—		—		—			—			—			(8,176		)	(8,176		)
Balance at June 30, 2013	$	—	$	8,690	$	80,252		$	(3,858	)	$	84,325		$	2,874		$	172,283
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	—	$	8,690	$	80,506		$	(3,702	)	$	91,473		$	1,049		$	178,016
Net income	—		—		—			—			9,726			—			9,726
Dividends paid on common stock ($0.29 per share)	—		—		—			—			(2,445		)	—			(2,445		)
Stock options exercised (3,310 shares)	—		—		(10		)	60			—			—			50
Release/lapse of restriction on RSUs (26,641 shares)	—		—		(418		)	443			—			—			25
Repurchase of common stock (113,566 shares)	—		—		—			(2,751		)	—			—			(2,751		)
Stock compensation	—		—		245			—			—			—			245
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	—		—		—			—			—			3,650			3,650
Balance at June 30, 2014	$	—	$	8,690	$	80,323		$	(5,950	)	$	98,754		$	4,699		$	186,516

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS



(unaudited) (dollars in thousands)	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	9,726		$	9,321
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan losses	750			800
Depreciation, amortization and accretion	2,179			2,709
Loss on sale of premises and equipment	5			2
Deferred income taxes	2,588			(76		)
Stock-based compensation	245			167
Net gain on sale or call of available for sale securities	(974		)	(84		)
Net (gain) loss on sale of other real estate owned	8			(39		)
Net gain on sale of loans held for sale	(189		)	(838		)
Writedown of other real estate owned	49			33
Origination of loans held for sale	(16,381		)	(52,325		)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale	14,980			53,054
Decrease in accrued interest receivable	1,099			754
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance	(454		)	(461		)
Decrease in other assets	228			3,309
Decrease in deferred compensation liability	(35		)	(42		)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities	1,155			(590		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	14,979			15,694
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities	15,870			12,205
Proceeds from maturities and calls of available for sale securities	36,210			59,139
Purchases of available for sale securities	(19,606		)	(37,243		)
Proceeds from maturities and calls of held to maturity securities	465			540
Purchase of held to maturity securities	(10,533		)	(1,185		)
Decrease (increase) in loans	1,675			(26,372		)
Decrease in loan pool participations, net	4,061			5,933
Purchases of premises and equipment	(5,892		)	(2,025		)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned	212			586
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment	3			12
Proceeds from sale of assets held for sale	—			764
Net cash provided by investing activities	22,465			12,354
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net decrease in deposits	(27,290		)	(62,797		)
Increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased	(751		)	2,235
Decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase	(3,890		)	(11,146		)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	19,000			94,000
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	(22,000		)	(71,000		)
Stock options exercised	75			127
Dividends paid	(2,445		)	(2,121		)
Repurchase of common stock	(2,751		)	(967		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(40,052		)	(51,669		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(2,608		)	(23,621		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	24,890			47,191
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	22,282		$	23,570
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	4,735		$	6,786
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	464		$	4,038
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing activities:
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned	$	319		$	76

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1.Principles of Consolidation and Presentation

MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company,” which is also referred to herein as “we,” “our” or “us”) is an Iowa corporation incorporated in 1983, a bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 and a financial holding company under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. Our principal executive offices are located at 102 South Clinton Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240.

The Company owns 100% of the outstanding common stock of MidWestOne Bank, an Iowa state non-member bank chartered in 1934 with its main office in Iowa City, Iowa (the “Bank”), and 100% of the common stock of MidWestOne Insurance Services, Inc., Oskaloosa, Iowa. We operate primarily through our bank subsidiary, MidWestOne Bank, and MidWestOne Insurance Services, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary that operates an insurance agency business through six offices located in central and east-central Iowa.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all the information and notes necessary for complete financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). The information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is written with the presumption that the users of the interim financial statements have read or have access to the most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, which contains the latest audited financial statements and notes thereto, together with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as of December 31, 2013 and for the year then ended. Management believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position as of June 30, 2014, and the results of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect: (1) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, (2) the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and (3) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates are based on information available to management at the time the estimates are made. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 may not be indicative of results for the year ending December 31, 2014, or for any other period.

All significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of the quarterly financial statements are disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. In the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from banks and interest-bearing deposits in banks.

2.Shareholders' Equity

Preferred Stock: The number of authorized shares of preferred stock for the Company is 500,000. As of June 30, 2014, none were issued or outstanding.

Common Stock: As of June 30, 2014, the number of authorized shares of common stock for the Company was 15,000,000. As of June 30, 2014, 8,396,191 shares were outstanding.

On January 15, 2013, the Company's board of directors announced the renewal of the Company's share repurchase program, extending the expiration of the program to December 31, 2014 and increasing the remaining amount of authorized repurchases under the program to $5.0 million from the approximately $2.4 million of authorized repurchases that had previously remained. As of June 30, 2014 the remaining amount available for share repurchases under the program was $1.3 million.

On July 17, 2014, the board of directors of the Company approved a new share repurchase program, allowing for the repurchase of up to $5.0 million of stock through December 31, 2016. The new repurchase program replaces the Company's prior repurchase program. Pursuant to the program, the Company may continue to repurchase shares from time to time in the open market, and the method, timing and amounts of repurchase will be solely in the discretion of the Company's management. The repurchase program does not require the Company to acquire a specific number of shares. Therefore, the amount of shares repurchased pursuant to the program will depend on several factors, including market conditions, capital and liquidity requirements, and alternative uses for cash available.

Table of Contents

3.Earnings per Common Share

Basic per-share amounts are computed by dividing net income (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator). Diluted per share amounts assume issuance of all common stock issuable upon conversion or exercise of other securities, unless the effect is to reduce the loss or increase the income per common share from continuing operations.

The following table presents the computation of earnings per common share for the respective periods:



	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)	2014		2013		2014		2013
Basic earnings per common share computation
Numerator:
Net income	$	4,753	$	4,531	$	9,726	$	9,321

Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding	8,428,307		8,474,925		8,451,819		8,484,100
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.56	$	0.54	$	1.15	$	1.10

Diluted earnings per common share computation
Numerator:
Net income	$	4,753	$	4,531	$	9,726	$	9,321

Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding, included all dilutive potential shares	8,452,291		8,517,292		8,479,989		8,526,961
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.56	$	0.53	$	1.14	$	1.09

4.Investment Securities

The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale, with gross unrealized gains and losses, are as follows:



	As of June 30, 2014
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
(in thousands)
U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	49,459	$	409	$	549	$	49,319
State and political subdivisions	193,111		7,891		535		200,467
Mortgage-backed securities	39,794		1,888		—		41,682
Collateralized mortgage obligations	145,269		971		3,115		143,125
Corporate debt securities	34,282		291		131		34,442
Total debt securities	461,915		11,450		4,330		469,035
Other equity securities	2,673		467		39		3,101
Total	$	464,588	$	11,917	$	4,369	$	472,136

Table of Contents



	As of December 31, 2013
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
(in thousands)
U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	45,279	$	527	$	867	$	44,939
State and political subdivisions	207,734		5,625		2,563		210,796
Mortgage-backed securities	37,593		1,692		—		39,285
Collateralized mortgage obligations	171,714		1,003		3,494		169,223
Collateralized debt obligations	2,111		190		984		1,317
Corporate debt securities	29,802		284		142		29,944
Total debt securities	494,233		9,321		8,050		495,504
Other equity securities	2,659		453		55		3,057
Total	$	496,892	$	9,774	$	8,105	$	498,561

The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities held to maturity, with gross unrealized gains and losses, are as follows:



	As of June 30, 2014
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
(in thousands)
State and political subdivisions	$	30,403	$	61	$	469	$	29,995
Mortgage-backed securities	23		3		—		26
Collateralized mortgage obligations	9,007		—		487		8,520
Corporate debt securities	3,264		—		237		3,027
Total	$	42,697	$	64	$	1,193	$	41,568



	As of December 31, 2013
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value
(in thousands)
State and political subdivisions	$	19,888	$	—	$	1,326	$	18,562
Mortgage-backed securities	28		3		—		31
Collateralized mortgage obligations	9,447		—		834		8,613
Corporate debt securities	3,262		—		277		2,985
Total	$	32,625	$	3	$	2,437	$	30,191

Investment securities with a carrying value of $173.9 million and $202.8 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, were pledged on public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and for other purposes, as required or permitted by law.

The summary of investment securities shows that some of the securities in the available for sale and held to maturity investment portfolios had unrealized losses, or were temporarily impaired, as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. This temporary impairment represents the estimated amount of loss that would be realized if the securities were sold on the valuation date.

Table of Contents

The following presents information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized losses as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position:



		As of June 30, 2014
	Number of Securities	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
Available for Sale	Number of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
(in thousands, except number of securities)
U.S. Government agencies and corporations	3	$	—	$	—	$	22,259	$	549	$	22,259	$	549
State and political subdivisions	70	7,189		30		15,865		505		23,054		535
Collateralized mortgage obligations	16	42,577		754		52,778		2,361		95,355		3,115
Corporate debt securities	4	8,333		53		3,620		78		11,953		131
Other equity securities	1	961		39		—		—		961		39
Total	94	$	59,060	$	876	$	94,522	$	3,493	$	153,582	$	4,369



		As of December 31, 2013
	Number of Securities	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
	Number of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
(in thousands, except number of securities)
U.S. Government agencies and corporations	3	$	21,977	$	867	$	—	$	—	$	21,977	$	867
State and political subdivisions	171	54,153		2,331		1,799		232		55,952		2,563
Collateralized mortgage obligations	18	110,142		3,164		5,047		330		115,189		3,494
Collateralized debt obligations	3	—		—		934		984		934		984
Corporate debt securities	3	7,430		93		1,561		49		8,991		142
Other equity securities	1	945		55		—		—		945		55
Total	199	$	194,647	$	6,510	$	9,341	$	1,595	$	203,988	$	8,105



		As of June 30, 2014
	Number of Securities	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
Held to Maturity	Number of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
(in thousands, except number of securities)
State and political subdivisions	39	$	3,727	$	48	$	13,313	$	421	$	17,040	$	469
Collateralized mortgage obligations	1	—		—		8,520		487		8,520		487
Corporate debt securities	2	650		230		237		7		887		237
Total	42	$	4,377	$	278	$	22,070	$	915	$	26,447	$	1,193



		As of December 31, 2013
	Number of Securities	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
	Number of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
(in thousands, except number of securities)
State and political subdivisions	30	$	17,420	$	1,195	$	1,142	$	131	$	18,562	$	1,326
Collateralized mortgage obligations	1	8,613		834		—		—		8,613		834
Corporate debt securities	2	2,984		277		—		—		2,984		277
Total	33	$	29,017	$	2,306	$	1,142	$	131	$	30,159	$	2,437

The Company's assessment of other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") is based on its reasonable judgment of the specific facts and circumstances impacting each individual security at the time such assessments are made. The Company reviews and considers factual information, including expected cash flows, the structure of the security, the creditworthiness of the issuer, the type of underlying assets and the current and anticipated market conditions.

At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company's mortgage-backed securities portfolio consisted of securities predominantly backed by one- to four- family mortgage loans and underwritten to the standards of and guaranteed by the following government-sponsored agencies: the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC), the Federal

Table of Contents

National Mortgage Association (FNMA), and the Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA). The receipt of principal, at par, and interest on mortgage-backed securities is guaranteed by the respective government-sponsored agency guarantor, such that the Company believes that its mortgage-backed securities do not expose the Company to credit-related losses.

At June 30, 2014, approximately 61% of the municipal bonds held by the Company were Iowa based. The Company does not intend to sell these municipal obligations, and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell them before the recovery of its cost. Due to the issuers' continued satisfaction of their obligations under the securities in accordance with their contractual terms and the expectation that they will continue to do so, management's intent and ability to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value, as well as the evaluation of the fundamentals of the issuers' financial condition and other objective evidence, the Company believes that the municipal obligations identified in the tables above were temporarily depressed as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

At December 31, 2013, the Company owned five collateralized debt obligations ("CDOs") backed by pools of trust preferred securities with an original cost basis of $8.8 million. The amortized cost of these securities as of December 31, 2013 totaled $2.1 million, after OTTI charges had been recognized. During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, the Company sold these investment securities at a net gain of $0.8 million.

As of June 30, 2014, the Company also owned $2.1 million of equity securities in banks and financial service-related companies, and $1.0 million of mutual funds invested in debt securities and other debt instruments that will cause units of the fund to be deemed to be qualified under the Community Reinvestment Act. Equity securities are considered to have OTTI whenever they have been in a loss position, compared to current book value, for twelve consecutive months, and the Company does not expect them to recover to their original cost basis. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and the full year of 2013, no impairment charges were recorded, as the affected equity securities were not deemed impaired due to stabilized market prices in relation to the Company's original purchase price.

The following table provides a roll forward of credit losses on fixed maturity securities recognized in net income:



	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		2014			2013
(in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	—	$	7,379	$	6,639		$	7,379
Reductions to credit losses:
Securities with other than temporary impairment, due to sale	—		—		(6,639		)	—
Ending balance	$	—	$	7,379	$	—		$	7,379

It is reasonably possible that the fair values of the Company's investment securities could decline in the future if the overall economy or the financial condition of the issuers deteriorate or the liquidity of certain securities remains depressed. As a result, there is a risk that additional OTTI may be recognized in the future and any such amounts could be material to the Company's consolidated statements of operations.

The contractual maturity distribution of investment debt securities at June 30, 2014, is summarized as follows:



	Available For Sale				Held to Maturity
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
(in thousands)
Due in one year or less	$	27,752	$	28,201	$	185	$	185
Due after one year through five years	94,605		96,848		2,726		2,716
Due after five years through ten years	107,401		111,352		12,280		12,228
Due after ten years	47,094		47,827		18,476		17,893
Debt securities without a single maturity date	185,063		184,807		9,030		8,546
Total	$	461,915	$	469,035	$	42,697	$	41,568

Mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are collateralized by mortgage loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Experience has indicated that principal payments will be collected sooner than scheduled because of prepayments. Therefore, these securities are not scheduled in the maturity categories indicated above. Equity

Table of Contents

securities available for sale with an amortized cost of $2.7 million and a fair value of $3.1 million are also excluded from this table.

Other investment securities include investments in Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock. The carrying value of the FHLB stock at June 30, 2014 was $9.0 million and at December 31, 2013 was $9.2 million, which is included in the Other Assets line of the consolidated balance sheets. This security is not readily marketable and ownership of FHLB stock is a requirement for membership in the FHLB-Des Moines. The amount of FHLB stock the Bank is required to hold is directly related to the amount of FHLB advances borrowed. Because there are no available market values, this security is carried at cost and evaluated for potential impairment each quarter. Redemption of this investment is at the option of the FHLB.

Realized gains and losses on sales are determined on the basis of specific identification of investments based on the trade date. Realized gains on investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013			2014			2013
(in thousands)
Available for sale fixed maturity securities:
Gross realized gains	$	191	$	64		$	1,120		$	144
Gross realized losses	—		(60		)	(146		)	(60		)
Other-than-temporary impairment	—		—			—			—
	191		4			974			84
Equity securities:
Gross realized gains	—		—			—			—
Gross realized losses	—		—			—			—
Other-than-temporary impairment	—		—			—			—
	—		—			—			—
Total net realized gains and losses	$	191	$	4		$	974		$	84

5.Loans Receivable and the Allowance for Loan Losses

The composition of allowance for loan losses, loans, and loan pool participations by portfolio segment are as follows:



	Allowance for Loan Losses and Recorded Investment in Loan Receivables
	As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013
(in thousands)	Agricultural		Commercial and Industrial		Commercial Real Estate		Residential Real Estate		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
June 30, 2014
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	134	$	393	$	259	$	175	$	1	$	—	$	962
Collectively evaluated for impairment	1,011		4,790		4,475		2,854		228		2,112		15,470
Total	$	1,145	$	5,183	$	4,734	$	3,029	$	229	$	2,112	$	16,432
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (loan pool participations)	$	1	$	50	$	597	$	90	$	8	$	1,388	$	2,134
Loans receivable
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,052	$	3,512	$	4,617	$	1,776	$	27	$	—	$	12,984
Collectively evaluated for impairment	86,451		279,326		420,347		267,988		18,825		—		1,072,937
Total	$	89,503	$	282,838	$	424,964	$	269,764	$	18,852	$	—	$	1,085,921
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (loan pool participations)	$	11	$	1,099	$	15,682	$	3,467	$	13	$	3,334	$	23,606

Table of Contents



(in thousands)	Agricultural		Commercial and Industrial		Commercial Real Estate		Residential Real Estate		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
December 31, 2013
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	125	$	559	$	513	$	220	$	6	$	—	$	1,423
Collectively evaluated for impairment	1,233		4,421		4,781		2,965		269		1,087		14,756
Total	$	1,358	$	4,980	$	5,294	$	3,185	$	275	$	1,087	$	16,179
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (loan pool participations)	$	3	$	64	$	627	$	88	$	6	$	1,346	$	2,134
Loans receivable
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,146	$	3,521	$	5,079	$	1,664	$	50	$	—	$	13,460
Collectively evaluated for impairment	94,021		260,130		429,345		272,462		18,994		—		1,074,952
Total	$	97,167	$	263,651	$	434,424	$	274,126	$	19,044	$	—	$	1,088,412
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (loan pool participations)	$	49	$	1,302	$	18,168	$	3,823	$	18	$	4,307	$	27,667

Loans with unpaid principal in the amount of $400.0 million and $408.4 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, were pledged to the FHLB as collateral for borrowings.

The changes in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment are as follows:




	Allowance for Loan Loss Activity
	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands)	Agricultural			Commercial and Industrial			Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
2014
Beginning balance	$	1,034		$	5,404		$	4,490		$	2,989		$	294		$	2,214		$	16,425
Charge-offs	—			(103		)	(80		)	(139		)	(22		)	—			(344		)
Recoveries	—			41			—			1			9			—			51
Provision	111			(159		)	324			178			(52		)	(102		)	300
Ending balance	$	1,145		$	5,183		$	4,734		$	3,029		$	229		$	2,112		$	16,432
2013
Beginning balance	$	971		$	4,396		$	5,894		$	3,084		$	258		$	1,657		$	16,260
Charge-offs	—			(203		)	(88		)	(68		)	(22		)	—			(381		)
Recoveries	31			30			5			21			12			—			99
Provision	(7		)	551			(147		)	297			31			(125		)	600
Ending balance	$	995		$	4,774		$	5,664		$	3,334		$	279		$	1,532		$	16,578



	Allowance for Loan Loss Activity
	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
(in thousands)	Agricultural			Commercial and Industrial			Commercial Real Estate			Residential Real Estate			Consumer			Unallocated		Total
2014
Beginning balance	$	1,358		$	4,980		$	5,294		$	3,185		$	275		$	1,087	$	16,179
Charge-offs	—			(273		)	(153		)	(201		)	(45		)	—		(672		)
Recoveries	5			154			—			4			12			—		175
Provision	(218		)	322			(407		)	41			(13		)	1,025		750
Ending balance	$	1,145		$	5,183		$	4,734		$	3,029		$	229		$	2,112	$	16,432
2013
Beginning balance	$	1,026		$	4,599		$	5,767		$	3,007		$	356		$	1,202	$	15,957
Charge-offs	(39		)	(376		)	(88		)	(180		)	(71		)	—		(754		)
Recoveries	36			39			462			23			15			—		575
Provision	(28		)	512			(477		)	484			(21		)	330		800
Ending balance	$	995		$	4,774		$	5,664		$	3,334		$	279		$	1,532	$	16,578

Loan Portfolio Segment Risk Characteristics

Agricultural - Agricultural loans, most of which are secured by crops, livestock, and machinery, are provided to finance capital improvements and farm operations as well as acquisitions of livestock and machinery. However, depending on the overall financial condition of the borrower, some loans are made on an unsecured basis. The collateral securing these loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. The ability of the borrower to repay may be affected by many factors outside of the borrower's control including adverse weather conditions, loss of livestock due to disease or other factors, declines in market prices for agricultural

Table of Contents

products and the impact of government regulations. The ultimate repayment of agricultural loans is dependent upon the profitable operation or management of the agricultural entity.

Commercial and Industrial - Commercial and industrial loans are primarily made based on the reported cash flow of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The collateral support provided by the borrower for most of these loans and the probability of repayment are based on the liquidation of the pledged collateral and enforcement of a personal guarantee, if any exists. The primary repayment risks of commercial and industrial loans are that the cash flows of the borrower may be unpredictable, and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. The size of the loans the Company can offer to commercial customers is less than the size of the loans that competitors with larger lending limits can offer. This may limit the Company's ability to establish relationships with the largest businesses in the areas in which the Company operates. As a result, the Company may assume greater lending risks than financial institutions that have a lesser concentration of such loans and tend to make loans to larger businesses. Collateral for these loans generally includes accounts receivable, inventory, equipment and real estate. However, depending on the overall financial condition of the borrower, some loans are made on an unsecured basis. The collateral securing these loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. In addition, if the U.S. economy does not continue to improve, this could harm or continue to harm the businesses of the Company's commercial and industrial customers and reduce the value of the collateral securing these loans.

Commercial Real Estate - The Company offers mortgage loans to commercial and agricultural customers for the acquisition of real estate used in their businesses, such as offices, warehouses and production facilities, and to real estate investors for the acquisition of apartment buildings, retail centers, office buildings and other commercial buildings. The market value of real estate securing commercial real estate loans can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located. Adverse developments affecting real estate values in one or more of the Company's markets could increase the credit risk associated with its loan portfolio. Additionally, real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts than non-real estate loans, and the repayment of the loans generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the properties securing the loans to cover operating expenses and debt service. Economic events or governmental regulations outside of the Company's control or that of the borrower could negatively impact the future cash flow and market values of the affected properties.

Residential Real Estate - The Company generally retains short-term residential mortgage loans that are originated for its own portfolio but sells most long-term loans to other parties while retaining servicing rights on the majority of those loans. The market value of real estate securing residential real estate loans can fluctuate as a result of market conditions in the geographic area in which the real estate is located. Adverse developments affecting real estate values in one or more of the Company's markets could increase the credit risk associated with its loan portfolio. Additionally, real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts than non-real estate loans, and the repayment of the loans generally is dependent, in large part, on the borrower's continuing financial stability, and is therefore more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances.

Consumer - Consumer loans typically have shorter terms, lower balances, higher yields and higher risks of default than real estate related loans. Consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower's continuing financial stability, and are therefore more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances. Collateral for these loans generally includes automobiles, boats, recreational vehicles, mobile homes, and real estate. However, depending on the overall financial condition of the borrower, some loans are made on an unsecured basis. The collateral securing these loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to recover and may fluctuate in value based on condition. In addition, a decline in the United States economy could result in reduced employment, impacting the ability of customers to repay their obligations.

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (loan pool participations) - The underlying loans in the loan pool participations include both fixed-rate and variable-rate instruments. No amounts for interest due are reflected in the carrying value of the loan pool participations. Based on historical experience, the average period of collectibility for loans underlying loan pool participations, many of which have exceeded contractual maturity dates, is approximately three to five years. Loan pool balances are affected by the payment and refinancing activities of the borrowers resulting in pay-offs of the underlying loans and reduction in the balances. Collections from the individual borrowers are managed by the loan pool servicer and are affected by the borrower's financial ability and willingness to pay, foreclosure and legal action, collateral value, and the economy in general.

Charge-off Policy

The Company requires a loan to be charged-off as soon as it becomes apparent that some loss will be incurred, or when its collectability is sufficiently questionable that it no longer is considered a bankable asset. The primary considerations

Table of Contents

when determining if and how much of a loan should be charged-off are as follows: (1) the potential for future cash flows; (2) the value of any collateral; and (3) the strength of any co-makers or guarantors.

When it is determined that a loan requires a partial or full charge-off, a request for approval of a charge-off is submitted to the Bank's President, Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, and the Senior Regional Loan officer. The Bank's board of directors formally approves all loan charge-offs. Once a loan is charged-off, it cannot be restructured and returned to the Bank's books.

The Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses - Bank Loans

The Company requires the maintenance of an adequate allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) in order to cover estimated probable losses without eroding the Company's capital base. Calculations are done at each quarter end, or more frequently if warranted, to analyze the collectability of loans and to ensure the adequacy of the allowance. In line with Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "FDIC") directives, the ALLL calculation does not include consideration of loans held for sale or off-balance-sheet credit exposures (such as unfunded letters of credit). Determining the appropriate level for the ALLL relies on the informed judgment of management, and as such, is subject to inaccuracy. Given the inherently imprecise nature of calculating the necessary ALLL, the Company's policy permits an "unallocated" allowance between 15% above and 5% below the “indicated reserve.” These unallocated amounts are due to those overall factors impacting the ALLL that are not captured in detailed loan category calculations.

Loans Reviewed Individually for Impairment

The Company identifies loans to be reviewed and evaluated individually for impairment based on current information and events and the probability that the borrower will be unable to repay all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Specific areas of consideration include: size of credit exposure, risk rating, delinquency, nonaccrual status, and loan classification.

The level of individual impairment is measured using one of the following methods: (1) the fair value of the collateral less costs to sell; (2) the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate; or (3) the loan's observable market price. Loans that are deemed fully collateralized or have been charged down to a level corresponding with any of the three measurements require no assignment of reserves from the ALLL.

All loans deemed troubled debt restructure or “TDR” are considered impaired. A loan is considered a TDR when the Bank, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower's financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that the Bank would not otherwise consider. All of the following factors are potential indicators that the Bank has granted a concession (one or multiple items may be present):


•	The borrower receives a reduction of the stated interest rate for the remaining original life of the debt.


•	The borrower receives an extension of the maturity date or dates at a stated interest rate lower that the current market interest rate for new debt with similar risk characteristics.


•	The borrower receives a reduction of the face amount or maturity amount of the debt as stated in the instrument or other agreement.


•	The borrower receives a deferral of required payments (principal and/or interest).


•	The borrower receives a reduction of the accrued interest.

Table of Contents

The following tables set forth information on the Company's TDRs by class of financing receivable occurring during the stated periods:



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2014					2013
	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
(dollars in thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings:
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens
Interest rate reduction	—	—		—		1	55		57
Total	—	$	—	$	—	1	$	55	$	57



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014					2013
	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
(dollars in thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings⁽¹⁾:
Commercial and industrial
Amortization or maturity date change	—	$	—	$	—	1	$	158	$	158
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate-other
Amortization or maturity date change	—	—		—		2	165		136
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens
Interest rate reduction	—	—		—		2	164		169
One- to four- family junior liens
Interest rate reduction	—	—		—		1	8		13
Total	—	$	—	$	—	6	$	495	$	476

(1) TDRs may include multiple concessions and the disclosure classifications are based on the primary concession provided to the borrower.

Loans by class of financing receivable modified as TDRs within the previous 12 months and for which there was a payment default during the stated periods were:



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
(dollars in thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings⁽¹⁾ That Subsequently Defaulted:
Commercial and industrial
Amortization or maturity date change	—	—		1	536		—	$	—	2	$	688
Commercial real estate:
Commercial real estate-other
Amortization or maturity date change	—	—		1	72		—	—		1	72
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens
Interest rate reduction	—	—		1	112		—	—		1	112
Total	—	$	—	3	$	720	—	$	—	4	$	872

(1) TDRs may include multiple concessions and the disclosure classifications are based on the primary concession provided to the borrower.

Table of Contents

Loans Reviewed Collectively for Impairment

All loans not evaluated individually for impairment are grouped together by type (i.e. commercial, agricultural, consumer, etc.) and further segmented within each subset by risk classification (i.e. pass, special mention, and substandard). Homogeneous loans past due 60-89 days and 90 days and over are classified special mention and substandard, respectively, for allocation purposes.

The Company's historical loss experience for each loan type is calculated using the fiscal quarter-end data for the most recent 20 quarters as a starting point for estimating losses. In addition, other prevailing qualitative or environmental factors likely to cause probable losses to vary from historical data are incorporated in the form of adjustments to increase or decrease the loss rate applied to each group. These adjustments are documented and fully explain how the current information, events, circumstances, and conditions impact the historical loss measurement assumptions.

Although not a comprehensive list, the following are considered key factors and are evaluated with each calculation of the ALLL to determine if adjustments to historical loss rates are warranted:


•	Changes in lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses.


•	Changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectability of the portfolio, including the condition of various market segments.


•	Changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and in the terms of loans.


•	Changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending management and other relevant staff.


•	Changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans.


•	Changes in the quality of our loan review system.


•	Changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans.


•	The existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations.


•	The effect of other external factors, such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements, on the level of estimated credit losses in the Bank's existing portfolio.

The items listed above are used to determine the pass percentage for loans evaluated collectively and, as such, are applied to the loans risk rated pass. Due to the inherent risks associated with special mention risk rated loans (i.e. early stages of financial deterioration, technical exceptions, etc.), this subset is reserved at two times the pass allocation factor to reflect this increased risk exposure. In addition, non-impaired loans classified as substandard loans carry greater risk than special mention loans, and as such, this subset is reserved at six times the pass allocation. Further, non-impaired loans less than $0.2 million that are past due 60 - 89 days or 90 days and over, are respectively classified as special mention or substandard. They are given an increased loan loss allocation of 25% or 50%, respectively, above the five year historical loss rate of the specific loan type.

The Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses - Loan Pool Participations

The Company requires that the loan pool participation ALLL will be at least sufficient to cover the next quarter's estimated charge-offs as presented by the servicer. Currently, charge-offs are netted against the income the Company receives, thus the balance in the loan pool participation reserve is not affected and remains stable. In essence, a provision for loan losses is made that is equal to the quarterly charge-offs, which is deducted from income received from the loan pool participations. By maintaining a sufficient reserve to cover the next quarter's charge-offs, the Company will have sufficient reserves in place should no income be collected from the loan pool participations during the quarter. In the event the estimated charge-offs provided by the servicer are greater than the loan pool participation ALLL, an additional provision is made to cover the difference between the current ALLL and the estimated charge-offs provided by the servicer.

Loans Reviewed Individually for Impairment

The loan servicer reviews the portfolio quarterly on a loan-by-loan basis, and loans that are deemed to be impaired are charged-down to their estimated value. All loans that are to be charged-down are reserved against in the ALLL adequacy calculation. Loans that continue to have an investment basis that have been charged-down are monitored, and if additional impairment is noted, the reserve requirement is increased on the individual loan.

Loans Reviewed Collectively for Impairment

The Company utilizes the annualized average of portfolio loan (not loan pool participations) historical loss per risk category over a two-year period of time. Supporting documentation for the technique used to develop the historical loss rate for each group of loans is required to be maintained. It is management's assessment that the two-year rate is most reflective of the probable credit losses in the current loan pool portfolio.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the composition of each class of the Company's loans by internally assigned credit quality indicators at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	Pass		Special Mention/ Watch		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
(in thousands)
June 30, 2014
Agricultural	$	82,421	$	5,609	$	1,473	$	—	$	—	$	89,503
Commercial and industrial	250,775		15,674		14,882		—		—		281,331
Credit cards	1,216		5		15		—		—		1,236
Overdrafts	279		77		88		—		—		444
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	59,837		9,943		1,305		—		—		71,085
Farmland	78,854		2,159		2,295		—		—		83,308
Multifamily	55,596		185		—		—		—		55,781
Commercial real estate-other	200,948		12,281		1,561		—		—		214,790
Total commercial real estate	395,235		24,568		5,161		—		—		424,964
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	209,949		4,552		3,136		—		—		217,637
One- to four- family junior liens	51,891		82		154		—		—		52,127
Total residential real estate	261,840		4,634		3,290		—		—		269,764
Consumer	18,621		29		29		—		—		18,679
Total	$	1,010,387	$	50,596	$	24,938	$	—	$	—	$	1,085,921
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (loan pool participations)	$	11,385	$	—	$	12,213	$	—	$	8	$	23,606



	Pass		Special Mention/ Watch		Substandard		Doubtful		Loss		Total
(in thousands)
December 31, 2013
Agricultural	$	93,187	$	460	$	3,520	$	—	$	—	$	97,167
Commercial and industrial	239,485		11,097		11,786		—		—		262,368
Credit cards	1,010		1		17		—		—		1,028
Overdrafts	326		123		88		—		—		537
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	56,112		14,984		1,493		—		—		72,589
Farmland	80,044		3,091		2,340		—		—		85,475
Multifamily	53,315		1,732		396		—		—		55,443
Commercial real estate-other	205,914		12,994		2,009		—		—		220,917
Total commercial real estate	395,385		32,801		6,238		—		—		434,424
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	213,815		3,994		2,859		—		—		220,668
One- to four- family junior liens	53,225		38		195		—		—		53,458
Total residential real estate	267,040		4,032		3,054		—		—		274,126
Consumer	18,643		57		62		—		—		18,762
Total	$	1,015,076	$	48,571	$	24,765	$	—	$	—	$	1,088,412
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (loan pool participations)	$	13,569	$	—	$	14,093	$	—	$	5	$	27,667

Special Mention/Watch - A special mention/watch asset has potential weaknesses that deserve management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the Company's credit position at some future date. Special mention/watch assets are not adversely classified and do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

Substandard - Substandard loans are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the

Table of Contents

deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful - Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loss - Loans classified loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset even though partial recovery may be effected in the future.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the amounts and categories of the Company's impaired loans as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	June 30, 2014						December 31, 2013
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
(in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Agricultural	$	1,410	$	1,910	$	—	$	1,475	$	1,975	$	—
Commercial and industrial	2,103		2,204		—		1,919		2,020		—
Credit cards	—		—		—		—		—		—
Overdrafts	—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	90		283		—		132		601		—
Farmland	85		98		—		93		107		—
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate-other	417		443		—		587		612		—
Total commercial real estate	592		824		—		812		1,320		—
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	791		1,036		—		622		741		—
One- to four- family junior liens	75		75		—		50		50		—
Total residential real estate	866		1,111		—		672		791		—
Consumer	8		24		—		10		26		—
Total	$	4,979	$	6,073	$	—	$	4,888	$	6,132	$	—
With an allowance recorded:
Agricultural	$	1,642	$	1,642	$	134	$	1,671	$	1,671	$	125
Commercial and industrial	1,409		1,465		393		1,602		1,657		559
Credit cards	—		—		—		—		—		—
Overdrafts	—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	—		—		—		7		7		3
Farmland	2,418		2,418		14		2,311		2,461		219
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate-other	1,607		1,821		245		1,949		2,164		291
Total commercial real estate	4,025		4,239		259		4,267		4,632		513
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	836		836		139		902		902		170
One- to four- family junior liens	74		74		36		90		90		50
Total residential real estate	910		910		175		992		992		220
Consumer	19		19		1		40		40		6
Total	$	8,005	$	8,275	$	962	$	8,572	$	8,992	$	1,423
Total:
Agricultural	$	3,052	$	3,552	$	134	$	3,146	$	3,646	$	125
Commercial and industrial	3,512		3,669		393		3,521		3,677		559
Credit cards	—		—		—		—		—		—
Overdrafts	—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	90		283		—		139		608		3
Farmland	2,503		2,516		14		2,404		2,568		219
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate-other	2,024		2,264		245		2,536		2,776		291
Total commercial real estate	4,617		5,063		259		5,079		5,952		513
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	1,627		1,872		139		1,524		1,643		170
One- to four- family junior liens	149		149		36		140		140		50
Total residential real estate	1,776		2,021		175		1,664		1,783		220
Consumer	27		43		1		50		66		6
Total	$	12,984	$	14,348	$	962	$	13,460	$	15,124	$	1,423

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the average recorded investment and interest income recognized for each category of the Company's impaired loans during the stated periods:



	Three Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014				2013					2014					2013
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized			Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized			Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
(in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Agricultural	$	1,410	$	65	$	1,491	$	14		$	1,414	$	80		$	1,531	$	30
Commercial and industrial	2,151		40		1,062		8			2,169		64			1,106		19
Credit cards	—		—		—		—			—		—			—		—
Overdrafts	—		—		—		—			—		—			—		—
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	90		1		149		—			90		1			149		—
Farmland	87		3		103		2			89		4			105		4
Multifamily	—		—		—		—			—		—			—		—
Commercial real estate-other	442		1		819		3			450		(7		)	818		6
Total commercial real estate	619		5		1,071		5			629		(2		)	1,072		10
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	798		6		478		—			803		5			482		4
One- to four- family junior liens	75		—		69		1			75		—			70		1
Total residential real estate	873		6		547		1			878		5			552		5
Consumer	8		—		20		—			9		—			21		—
Total	$	5,061	$	116	$	4,191	$	28		$	5,099	$	147		$	4,282	$	64
With an allowance recorded:
Agricultural	$	1,642	$	63	1,671		13			$	1,669	$	76		$	1,688	$	25
Commercial and industrial	1,446		24		919		11			1,475		38			929		24
Credit cards	—		—		—		—			—		—			—		—
Overdrafts	—		—		—		—			—		—			—		—
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	—		—		523		7			—		—			523		15
Farmland	2,418		139		2,316		27			2,433		166			2,316		54
Multifamily	—		—		—		—			—		—			—		—
Commercial real estate-other	1,608		18		791		8			1,612		27			793		15
Total commercial real estate	4,026		157		3,630		42			4,045		193			3,632		84
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	838		17		976		5			839		26			978		12
One- to four- family junior liens	74		—		102		(1		)	75		—			103		—
Total residential real estate	912		17		1,078		4			914		26			1,081		12
Consumer	20		1		39		1			20		1			39		1
Total	$	8,046	$	262	$	7,337	$	71		$	8,123	$	334		$	7,369	$	146
Total:
Agricultural	$	3,052	$	128	3,162		27			$	3,083	$	156		$	3,219	$	55
Commercial and industrial	3,597		64		1,981		19			3,644		102			2,035		43
Credit cards	—		—		—		—			—		—			—		—
Overdrafts	—		—		—		—			—		—			—		—
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	90		1		672		7			90		1			672		15
Farmland	2,505		142		2,419		29			2,522		170			2,421		58
Multifamily	—		—		—		—			—		—			—		—
Commercial real estate-other	2,050		19		1,610		11			2,062		20			1,611		21
Total commercial real estate	4,645		162		4,701		47			4,674		191			4,704		94
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	1,636		23		1,454		5			1,642		31			1,460		16
One- to four- family junior liens	149		—		171		—			150		—			173		1
Total residential real estate	1,785		23		1,625		5			1,792		31			1,633		17
Consumer	28		1		59		1			29		1			60		1
Total	$	13,107	$	378	$	11,528	$	99		$	13,222	$	481		$	11,651	$	210

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the composition and past due status of the Company's loans at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	30 - 59 Days Past Due		60 - 89 Days Past Due		90 Days or More Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Recorded Investment > 90 Days Past Due and Accruing
(in thousands)
June 30, 2014
Agricultural	$	275	$	29	$	32	$	336	$	89,167	$	89,503	$	6
Commercial and industrial	1,016		178		698		1,892		279,439		281,331		—
Credit cards	1		5		15		21		1,215		1,236		—
Overdrafts	45		17		27		89		355		444		—
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	72		—		90		162		70,923		71,085		—
Farmland	598		—		—		598		82,710		83,308		—
Multifamily	396		—		—		396		55,385		55,781		—
Commercial real estate-other	178		—		1,482		1,660		213,130		214,790		34
Total commercial real estate	1,244		—		1,572		2,816		422,148		424,964		34
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	2,022		724		1,172		3,918		213,719		217,637		582
One- to four- family junior liens	124		82		136		342		51,785		52,127		—
Total residential real estate	2,146		806		1,308		4,260		265,504		269,764		582
Consumer	49		29		10		88		18,591		18,679		2
Total	$	4,776	$	1,064	$	3,662	$	9,502	$	1,076,419	$	1,085,921	$	624
December 31, 2013
Agricultural	$	65	$	23	$	52	$	140	$	97,027	$	97,167	$	—
Commercial and industrial	610		876		960		2,446		259,922		262,368		213
Credit cards	—		1		17		18		1,010		1,028		17
Overdrafts	40		1		48		89		448		537		—
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	84		—		56		140		72,449		72,589		—
Farmland	—		—		—		—		85,475		85,475		—
Multifamily	—		—		395		395		55,048		55,443		395
Commercial real estate-other	604		190		1,740		2,534		218,383		220,917		164
Total commercial real estate	688		190		2,191		3,069		431,355		434,424		559
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	1,891		869		984		3,744		216,924		220,668		540
One- to four- family junior liens	316		38		175		529		52,929		53,458		49
Total residential real estate	2,207		907		1,159		4,273		269,853		274,126		589
Consumer	17		62		36		115		18,647		18,762		7
Total	$	3,627	$	2,060	$	4,463	$	10,150	$	1,078,262	$	1,088,412	$	1,385

Non-accrual and Delinquent Loans

Loans are placed on non-accrual when (1) payment in full of principal and interest is no longer expected or (2) principal or interest has been in default for 90 days or more (unless the loan is both well secured with marketable collateral and in the process of collection). All loans rated doubtful or worse, and certain loans rated substandard, are placed on non-accrual.

A non-accrual asset may be restored to an accrual status when (1) all past due principal and interest has been paid (excluding renewals and modifications that involve the capitalizing of interest) or (2) the loan becomes well secured with marketable collateral and is in the process of collection. An established track record of performance is also considered when determining accrual status.

Delinquency status of a loan is determined by the number of days that have elapsed past the loan's payment due date, using the following classification groupings: 30-59 days, 60-89 days and 90 days or more. Loans shown in the 30-59 days and 60-89 days columns in the table above reflect contractual delinquency status of loans not considered nonperforming due to classification as a TDR or being placed on non-accrual.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the composition of the Company's recorded investment in loans on nonaccrual status as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
(in thousands)
Agricultural	$	26	$	52
Commercial and industrial	731		746
Credit cards	—		—
Overdrafts	—		—
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	90		139
Farmland	26		29
Multifamily	—		—
Commercial real estate-other	1,448		1,576
Total commercial real estate	1,564		1,744
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	695		543
One- to four- family junior liens	135		126
Total residential real estate	830		669
Consumer	8		29
Total	$	3,159	$	3,240

As of June 30, 2014, the Company had no commitments to lend additional funds to any borrowers who have had a TDR.

Loan Pool Participations

ASC Topic 310 addresses accounting for differences between contractual cash flows and cash flows expected to be collected from an investor's initial investment in loans or debt securities acquired in a transfer if those differences are attributable, at least in part, to credit quality. The loans underlying the loan pool participations were evaluated individually when purchased for application of ASC Topic 310, utilizing various criteria including: past-due status, late payments, legal status of the loan (not in foreclosure, judgment against the borrower, or referred to legal counsel), frequency of payments made, collateral adequacy and the borrower's financial condition. If all the criteria were met, the individual loan utilized the accounting treatment required by ASC Topic 310 with the accretable yield difference between the expected cash flows and the purchased basis accreted into income on the level yield basis over the anticipated life of the loan. If any of the six criteria were not met at the time of purchase, the loan was accounted for on the cash basis of accounting.

The loan servicer reviews the portfolio quarterly on a loan-by-loan basis, and loans that are deemed to be impaired are charged down to their estimated value. As of June 30, 2014, approximately 72% of the loans were contractually current or less than 90 days past due, while 28% were contractually past due 90 days or more. Many of the loans were acquired in a contractually past due status, which was reflected in the discounted purchase price of the loans. Performance status is monitored on a monthly basis. The 28% of loans contractually past due includes loans in litigation and foreclosed property.

6.Income Taxes

Federal income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was computed using the consolidated effective federal tax rate. The Company also recognized income tax expense pertaining to state franchise taxes payable by the subsidiary bank.

7.Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received in selling an asset or paid in transferring a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability is not adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

GAAP requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:


•	Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

•

Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.


•	Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

It is the Company’s policy to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when developing fair value measurements. The Company is required to use observable inputs, to the extent available, in the fair value estimation process unless that data results from forced liquidations or distressed sales. A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.

Valuation methods for instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Securities Available for Sale - The Company’s investment securities classified as available for sale include: debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government corporations and agencies, debt securities issued by state and political subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, corporate debt securities, and equity securities. Quoted exchange prices are available for equity securities, which are classified as Level 1. The Company utilizes an independent pricing service to obtain the fair value of debt securities. On a quarterly basis, the Company selects a sample of 30 securities from its primary pricing service and compares them to a secondary independent pricing service to validate value. In addition, the Company periodically reviews the pricing methodology utilized by the primary independent service for reasonableness. Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government corporations and agencies and mortgage-backed obligations are priced utilizing industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including time value, yield curves, volatility factors, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity, current market and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace, can be derived from observable data, or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace and are classified as Level 2. Municipal securities are valued using a type of matrix, or grid, pricing in which securities are benchmarked against the treasury rate based on credit rating. These model and matrix measurements are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. On an annual basis, a group of selected municipal securities are priced by a securities dealer and that price is used to verify the primary independent service’s valuation.

The Company classified its pooled trust preferred CDOs as Level 3 until such securities were sold in the first quarter of 2014. The portfolio consisted of five investments in CDOs backed by pools of trust preferred securities issued by financial institutions and insurance companies. The Company had determined that the observable market data associated with these assets did not represent orderly transactions and reflected forced liquidations or distressed sales. Based on the lack of observable market data, the Company estimated fair value based on the observable data available and reasonable unobservable market data. The Company estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow model which used appropriately adjusted discount rates reflecting credit and liquidity risks.

Mortgage Servicing Rights - The Company recognizes the rights to service mortgage loans for others on residential real estate loans internally originated and then sold. Mortgage servicing rights are recorded at fair value based on assumptions

through a third-party valuation service. The valuation model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, such as the servicing cost per loan, the discount rate, the escrow float rate, an inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default rates and losses. Because many of these inputs are unobservable, the valuations are classified as Level 3.

The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. There were no liabilities subject to fair value measurement as of these dates. The assets are segregated by the level of valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:



	Fair Value Measurement at June 30, 2014 Using
(in thousands)	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Available for sale debt securities:
U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	49,319	$	—	$	49,319	$	—
State and political subdivisions	200,467		—		200,467		—
Mortgage-backed securities	41,682		—		41,682		—
Collateralized mortgage obligations	143,125		—		143,125		—
Corporate debt securities	34,442		—		34,442		—
Total available for sale debt securities	469,035		—		469,035		—
Available for sale equity securities:
Other equity securities	3,101		3,101		—		—
Total available for sale equity securities	3,101		3,101		—		—
Total securities available for sale	$	472,136	$	3,101	$	469,035	$	—

Mortgage servicing rights	$	2,313	$	—	$	—	$	2,313



	Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2013 Using
(in thousands)	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Available for sale debt securities:
U.S. Government agencies and corporations	$	44,939	$	—	$	44,939	$	—
State and political subdivisions	210,796		—		210,796		—
Mortgage-backed securities	39,285		—		39,285		—
Collateralized mortgage obligations	169,223		—		169,223		—
Collateralized debt obligations	1,317		—		—		1,317
Corporate debt securities	29,944		—		29,944		—
Total available for sale debt securities	495,504		—		494,187		1,317
Available for sale equity securities:
Other equity securities	3,057		3,057		—		—
Total available for sale equity securities	3,057		3,057		—		—
Total securities available for sale	$	498,561	$	3,057	$	494,187	$	1,317

Mortgage servicing rights	$	2,298	$	—	$	—	$	2,298

There were no transfers of assets between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.

The following table presents additional information about assets measured at fair market value on a recurring basis for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:



	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014						2013
	Collateralized Debt Obligations			Mortgage Servicing Rights			Collateralized Debt Obligations		Mortgage Servicing Rights
(in thousands)
Beginning balance	$	1,317		$	2,298		$	755	$	1,484
Transfers into Level 3	—			—			—		—
Transfers out of Level 3	—			—			—		—
Total gains (losses):
Included in earnings	782			(82		)	—		83
Included in other comprehensive income	794			—			31		—
Purchases, issuances, sales, and settlements:
Purchases	—			—			—		—
Issuances	—			97			—		232
Sales	(2,893		)	—			—		—
Settlements	—			—			—		—
Ending balance	$	—		$	2,313		$	786	$	1,799

The following table presents the amount of gains and losses included in earnings and other comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 that are attributable to the change in unrealized gains and losses relating to those assets still held, and the line item in the consolidated financial statements in which they are included:



	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014				2013
	Collateralized Debt Obligations		Mortgage Servicing Rights		Collateralized Debt Obligations		Mortgage Servicing Rights
(in thousands)
Total gains for the period in earnings*	$	782	$	15	$	—	$	315

Change in unrealized gains (losses) for the period included in other comprehensive income	794		—		31		—

* Gains on collateralized debt obligations are included in gain on sale or call of available for sale securities, while gains on mortgage servicing rights are included in mortgage origination and loan servicing fees, both in the consolidated statements of operations.

Changes in the fair value of available for sale securities are included in other comprehensive income to the extent the changes are not considered OTTI. OTTI tests are performed on a quarterly basis and any decline in the fair value of an individual security below its cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in a write-down that is reflected directly in the Company's consolidated statements of operations.

Valuation methods for instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans - From time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for credit losses is established. The specific reserves for collateral dependent impaired loans are based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell. The fair value of collateral is determined based on appraisals. In some cases, adjustments are made to the appraised values due to various factors, including age of the appraisal, age of comparables included in the appraisal, and known changes in the market and in the collateral. Because many of these inputs are unobservable, the valuations are classified as Level 3.

Other Real Estate Owned ("OREO") - OREO represents property acquired through foreclosures and settlements of loans. Property acquired is carried at the lower of the carrying amount of the loan at the time of acquisition, or the estimated fair value of the property, less disposal costs. The Company considers third party appraisals as well as independent fair value assessments from real estate brokers or persons involved in selling OREO in determining the fair value of particular properties. Accordingly, the valuation of OREO is subject to significant external and internal judgment. The Company also periodically reviews OREO to determine whether the property continues to be carried at the lower of its recorded book value or fair value of the property, less disposal costs. Because many of these inputs are unobservable, the valuations are classified as Level 3.

The following table discloses the Company's estimated fair value amounts of its assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. It is management's belief that the fair values presented below are reasonable based on the valuation techniques and data available to the Company as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, as more fully described above.



	Fair Value Measurement at June 30, 2014 Using
(in thousands)	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Collateral dependent impaired loans:
Agricultural	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial and industrial	1,091		—		—		1,091
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	90		—		—		90
Farmland	62		—		—		62
Multifamily	—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate-other	1,493		—		—		1,493
Total commercial real estate	1,645		—		—		1,645
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	516		—		—		516
One- to four- family junior liens	28		—		—		28
Total residential real estate	544		—		—		544
Consumer	28		—		—		28
Collateral dependent impaired loans	$	3,308	$	—	$	—	$	3,308
Other real estate owned	$	1,820	$	—	$	—	$	1,820



	Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2013 Using
(in thousands)	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Collateral dependent impaired loans:
Agricultural	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial and industrial	1,043		—		—		1,043
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	136		—		—		136
Farmland	65		—		—		65
Multifamily	—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate-other	1,786		—		—		1,786
Total commercial real estate	1,987		—		—		1,987
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	186		—		—		186
One- to four- family junior liens	30		—		—		30
Total residential real estate	216		—		—		216
Consumer	44		—		—		44
Collateral dependent impaired loans	$	3,290	$	—	$	—	$	3,290
Other real estate owned	$	1,770	$	—	$	—	$	1,770

The following presents the carrying amount and estimated fair value of the financial instruments held by the Company at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The information presented is subject to change over time based on a variety of factors. The operations of the Company are managed on a going concern basis and not a liquidation basis. As a result, the ultimate value realized from the financial instruments presented could be substantially different when actually recognized over time through the normal course of operations. Additionally, a substantial portion of the Company's inherent value is the Bank's capitalization and franchise value. Neither of these components has been given consideration in the presentation of fair values below.



	June 30, 2014
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	22,282	$	22,282	$	22,282	$	—	$	—
Investment securities:
Available for sale	472,136		472,136		3,101		469,035		—
Held to maturity	42,697		41,568		—		41,568		—
Total investment securities	514,833		513,704		3,101		510,603		—
Loans held for sale	1,947		1,970		—		—		1,970
Loans, net:
Agricultural	88,184		88,287		—		—		88,287
Commercial and industrial	275,644		276,153		—		—		276,153
Credit cards	1,191		1,191		—		—		1,191
Overdrafts	353		353		—		—		353
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	69,961		70,141		—		—		70,141
Farmland	82,439		83,125		—		—		83,125
Multifamily	55,216		55,241		—		—		55,241
Commercial real estate-other	211,787		212,774		—		—		212,774
Total commercial real estate	419,403		421,281		—		—		421,281
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	214,639		216,396		—		—		216,396
One- to four- family junior liens	51,572		51,732		—		—		51,732
Total residential real estate	266,211		268,128		—		—		268,128
Consumer	18,503		18,497		—		—		18,497
Total loans, net	1,069,489		1,073,890		—		—		1,073,890
Loan pool participations, net	21,472		21,472		—		—		21,472
Accrued interest receivable	9,310		9,310		9,310		—		—
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	8,991		8,991		—		8,991		—
Financial liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing demand	205,388		205,388		205,388		—		—
Interest-bearing checking	578,584		578,584		578,584		—		—
Savings	103,679		103,679		103,679		—		—
Certificates of deposit under $100,000	242,096		243,025		—		243,025		—
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over	217,905		218,270		—		218,270		—
Total deposits	1,347,652		1,348,946		887,651		461,295		—
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase	62,024		62,024		62,024		—		—
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	103,900		104,216		—		—		104,216
Long-term debt	15,464		9,937		—		—		9,937
Accrued interest payable	745		745		745		—		—



	December 31, 2013
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(in thousands)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	24,890	$	24,890	$	24,890	$	—	$	—
Investment securities:
Available for sale	498,561		498,561		3,057		494,187		1,317
Held to maturity	32,625		30,191		—		30,191		—
Total investment securities	531,186		528,752		3,057		524,378		1,317
Loans held for sale	357		367		—		—		367
Loans, net:
Agricultural	95,712		95,609		—		—		95,609
Commercial and industrial	257,153		256,257		—		—		256,257
Credit cards	998		998		—		—		998
Overdrafts	415		415		—		—		415
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	71,433		71,569		—		—		71,569
Farmland	84,387		85,058		—		—		85,058
Multifamily	54,883		54,953		—		—		54,953
Commercial real estate-other	217,993		219,213		—		—		219,213
Total commercial real estate	428,696		430,793		—		—		430,793
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	217,765		218,257		—		—		218,257
One- to four- family junior liens	52,903		53,798		—		—		53,798
Total residential real estate	270,668		272,055		—		—		272,055
Consumer	18,591		18,638		—		—		18,638
Total loans, net	1,072,233		1,074,765		—		—		1,074,765
Loan pool participations, net	25,533		25,533		—		—		25,533
Accrued interest receivable	10,409		10,409		10,409		—		—
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	9,226		9,226		—		9,226		—
Financial liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing demand	222,359		222,359		222,359		—		—
Interest-bearing checking	592,673		592,673		592,673		—		—
Savings	94,559		94,559		94,559		—		—
Certificates of deposit under $100,000	256,283		256,549		—		256,549		—
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over	209,068		209,543		—		209,543		—
Total deposits	1,374,942		1,375,683		909,591		466,092		—
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase	66,665		66,665		66,665		—		—
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	106,900		107,356		—		—		107,356
Long-term debt	15,464		9,872		—		—		9,872
Accrued interest payable	765		765		765		—		—


•	Cash and cash equivalents, federal funds purchased, securities sold under repurchase agreements, and accrued interest are instruments with carrying values that approximate fair value.


•	Investment securities available for sale are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Held to maturity securities are carried at amortized cost. Fair value is based upon quoted prices, if available. If a quoted price is not available, the fair value is obtained from benchmarking the security against similar securities by using a third-party pricing service.


•	Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, with fair value being based on recent observable loan sales. The portfolio has historically consisted primarily of residential real estate loans.


•	For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair values for other loans are determined using estimated future cash flows, discounted

at the interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers with similar credit quality. The Company does record nonrecurring fair value adjustments to loans to reflect (1) partial write-downs and allowances that are based on the observable market price or appraised value of the collateral or (2) the full charge-off of the loan carrying value.


•	Loan pool participation carrying values represent the discounted price paid by us to acquire our participation interests in the various loan pool participations purchased, which approximates fair value.


•	The fair value of FHLB stock is estimated at its carrying value and redemption price of $100 per share.

•

Deposit liabilities are carried at historical cost. The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts and certain money market account deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. If the fair value of the fixed maturity certificates of deposit is calculated at less than the carrying amount, the carrying value of these deposits is reported as the fair value.


•	FHLB borrowings and long-term debt are recorded at historical cost. The fair value of these items is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on the Company's current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

The following presents the valuation technique(s), observable inputs, and quantitative information about the unobservable inputs used for fair value measurements of the financial instruments held by the Company at June 30, 2014, categorized within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:

Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

(dollars in thousands)

Fair Value at June 30, 2014

Valuation Techniques(s)

Unobservable Input

Range of Inputs

Weighted Average

Collateral dependent impaired loans:

Commercial and industrial

1,091

Modified appraised value

Third party appraisal

NM *

Appraisal discount

NM *

Construction & development

Modified appraised value

Third party appraisal

NM *

Appraisal discount

NM *

Farmland

Modified appraised value

Third party appraisal

NM *

Appraisal discount

NM *

Commercial real estate-other

1,493

Modified appraised value

Third party appraisal

NM *

Appraisal discount

NM *

Residential real estate one- to four-

516

Modified appraised value

Third party appraisal

NM *

family first liens

Appraisal discount

NM *

Residential real estate one- to four-

Modified appraised value

Third party appraisal

NM *

family junior liens

Appraisal discount

NM *

Consumer

Modified appraised value

Third party appraisal

NM *

Appraisal discount

NM *

Mortgage servicing rights

2,313

Discounted cash flows

Constant prepayment rate

7.75

17.43

8.52

Pretax discount rate

10.18

13.00

10.16

Other real estate owned

1,820

Modified appraised value

Third party appraisal

NM *

Appraisal discount

NM *

* Not Meaningful. Third party appraisals are obtained as to the value of the underlying asset, but disclosure of this information would not provide meaningful information, as the range will vary widely from loan to loan. Types of discounts considered include age of the appraisal, local market conditions, current condition of the property, and estimated sales costs. These discounts will also vary from loan to loan, thus providing a range would not be meaningful.

Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on these estimated fair values.

Table of Contents

8.Variable Interest Entities

Loan Pool Participations

The Company has invested in certain participation certificates of loan pools which are purchased, held and serviced by a third-party independent servicing corporation. The Company's portfolio holds approximately 95% of the participation interests in the pools of loans owned and serviced by States Resources Corporation (“SRC”), a third-party loan servicing organization located in Omaha, Nebraska, in which the Company participates. SRC's owner holds the remaining interest. The Company does not have any ownership interest in or exert any control over SRC, and thus it is not included in the consolidated financial statements.

These pools of loans were purchased from large nonaffiliated banking organizations and from the FDIC acting as receiver of failed banks and savings associations. As loan pools were put out for bid (generally in a sealed bid auction), SRC's due diligence teams evaluated the loans and determined their interest in bidding on the pool. After the due diligence, the Company's management reviewed the status and decided if it wished to continue in the process. If the decision to consider a bid was made, SRC conducted additional analysis to determine the appropriate bid price. This analysis involved discounting loan cash flows with adjustments made for expected losses, changes in collateral values as well as targeted rates of return. A cost or investment basis was assigned to each individual loan on a cents-per-dollar (discounted price) basis based on SRC's assessment of the recovery potential of each loan.

Once a bid was awarded to SRC, the Company assumed the risk of profit or loss but on a non-recourse basis so the risk is limited to its initial investment. The extent of the risk is also dependent upon: the debtor or guarantor's financial condition, the possibility that a debtor or guarantor may file for bankruptcy protection, SRC's ability to locate any collateral and obtain possession, the value of such collateral, and the length of time it takes to realize the recovery either through collection procedures, legal process, or resale of the loans after a restructure.

Loan pool participations are shown on the Company's consolidated balance sheets as a separate asset category. The original carrying value or investment basis of loan pool participations is the discounted price paid by the Company to acquire its interests, which, as noted, is less than the face amount of the underlying loans. The Company's investment basis is reduced as SRC recovers principal on the loans and remits its share to the Company or as loan balances are written off as uncollectible.

9.Effect of New Financial Accounting Standards

In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. The objective of this update is to eliminate the diversity in practice on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. For public entities, the amendments became effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this amendment did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-01, Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects. The objective of this update is to provide guidance on accounting for investments by a reporting entity in flow-through limited liability entities that manage or invest in affordable housing projects that qualify for the low-income housing tax credit. The low-income housing tax credit program is designed to encourage private capital investment in the construction and rehabilitation of low-income housing. This program is an indirect tax subsidy that allows investors in a flow-through limited liability entity, such as limited partnerships or limited liability companies that manage or invest in qualified affordable housing projects, to receive the benefits of the tax credits allocated to the entity that owns the qualified affordable housing project. The tax credits are allowable on the tax return each year over a 10-year period as a result of a sufficient number of units being rented to qualifying tenants and are subject to restrictions on gross rentals paid by those tenants. Those credits are subject to recapture over a 15-year period starting with the first year tax credits are earned. The amendments in this update permit reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for their investments in qualified affordable housing projects using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions are met. For public entities, the amendments are to be applied retrospectively to all annual periods and interim reporting periods presented within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-04, Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure. The objective of this update is to reduce diversity by clarifying when an in-substance repossession or

Table of Contents

foreclosure occurs, that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan receivable should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. For public entities, the amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2014, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contract with Customers (Topic 606). The guidance in this update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (for example, insurance contracts or lease contracts). The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following five steps: 1) identify the contracts(s) with the customer; 2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; 3) determine the transaction price; 4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and 5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The guidance also specifies the accounting for some costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer. For a public entity, the amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. The Company is still evaluating the effect of this amendment on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures. The guidance in this update changes the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions and repurchase financing arrangements. It also requires enhanced disclosures about repurchase agreements and other similar transactions. The accounting changes in this update are effective for public companies for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2014. In addition, for public companies, the disclosure for certain transactions accounted for as a sale is effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and the disclosure for transactions accounted for as secured borrowings is required to be presented for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods beginning after March 15, 2015. Early application is not permitted. The adoption of this amendment is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

10.Subsequent Events

Management evaluated subsequent events through the date the consolidated financial statements were issued. Events or transactions occurring after June 30, 2014, but prior to the date the consolidated financial statements were issued, that provided additional evidence about conditions that existed at June 30, 2014 have been recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the period ended June 30, 2014. Events or transactions that provided evidence about conditions that did not exist at June 30, 2014, but arose before the consolidated financial statements were issued, have not been recognized in the consolidated financial statements for the period ended June 30, 2014.

On July 17, 2014, the board of directors of the Company declared a cash dividend of $0.145 per share payable on September 15, 2014 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on September 1, 2014.

Also on July 17, 2014, the board of directors of the Company approved a new share repurchase program, allowing for the repurchase of up to $5.0 million of stock through December 31, 2016. The new repurchase program replaces the Company's prior repurchase program, pursuant to which the Company had repurchased approximately $3.7 million of common stock since January 1, 2013. Pursuant to the program, the Company may continue to repurchase shares from time to time in the open market, and the method, timing and amounts of repurchase will be solely in the discretion of the Company's management. The repurchase program does not require the Company to acquire a specific number of shares. Therefore, the amount of shares repurchased pursuant to the program will depend on several factors, including market conditions, capital and liquidity requirements, and alternative uses for cash available.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

OVERVIEW

The Company provides financial services to individuals, businesses, governmental units and institutional customers in east central Iowa. The Bank has office locations in Belle Plaine, Burlington, Cedar Falls, Conrad, Coralville, Davenport, Fairfield, Fort Madison, Iowa City, Melbourne, North English, North Liberty, Oskaloosa, Ottumwa, Parkersburg, Pella, Sigourney, Waterloo and West Liberty, Iowa. MidWestOne Insurance Services, Inc. provides personal and business insurance services in Cedar Falls,

Table of Contents

Conrad, Melbourne, Oskaloosa, Parkersburg, and Pella, Iowa. The Bank is actively engaged in many areas of commercial banking, including: acceptance of demand, savings and time deposits; making commercial, real estate, agricultural and consumer loans; and other banking services tailored for its individual customers. The Wealth Management Division of the Bank administers estates, personal trusts, conservatorships, and pension and profit-sharing accounts along with providing brokerage and other investment management services to customers.

We operate as an independent community bank that offers a broad range of customer-focused financial services as an alternative to large regional and multi-state banks in our market area. Management has invested in infrastructure and staffing to support our strategy of serving the financial needs of businesses, individuals and municipalities in our market area. We focus our efforts on core deposit generation, especially transaction accounts, and quality loan growth with an emphasis on growing commercial loan balances. We seek to maintain a disciplined pricing strategy on deposit generation that will allow us to compete for high quality loans while maintaining an appropriate spread over funding costs.

Our results of operations depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income on our earning assets, such as loans and securities, and the interest expense paid on our deposits and borrowings. Results of operations are also affected by non-interest income and expense, the provision for loan losses and income tax expense. Significant external factors that impact our results of operations include general economic and competitive conditions, as well as changes in market interest rates, government policies, and actions of regulatory authorities.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and with the statistical information and financial data appearing in this report as well as our 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Results of operations for the three- and six-month period ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of results to be attained for any other period.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Critical accounting estimates are those which are both most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and require our management's most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Our critical accounting estimates relate to the allowance for loan losses, participation interests in loan pools, intangible assets, and fair value of available for sale investment securities, all of which involve significant judgment by our management. Information about our critical accounting estimates is included under Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013

Summary

For the quarter ended June 30, 2014 we earned net income of $4.8 million, compared with $4.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2013, an increase of 4.9%. Basic and diluted earnings per common share for the second quarter of 2014 were each $0.56, versus $0.54 basic and $0.53 diluted in the second quarter of 2013. Our annualized Return on Average Assets ("ROAA") for the second quarter of 2014 was 1.09% compared with a return of 1.02% for the same period in 2013. Our annualized Return on Average Shareholders' Equity ("ROAE") was 10.29% for the three months ended June 30, 2014 versus 10.23% for the three months ended June 30, 2013. The annualized Return on Average Tangible Equity ("ROATE") was 10.99% for the second quarter of 2014 compared with 11.05% for the same period in 2013.

The following table presents selected financial results and measures for the second quarter of 2014 and 2013.



	Three Months Ended June 30,
($ amounts in thousands)	2014			2013
Net Income	$	4,753		$	4,531
Average Assets	1,741,354			1,773,476
Average Shareholders' Equity	185,297			177,609
Return on Average Assets* (ROAA)	1.09		%	1.02		%
Return on Average Shareholders' Equity* (ROAE)	10.29			10.23
Return on Average Tangible Equity* (ROATE)	10.99			11.05
Total Equity to Assets (end of period)	10.78			9.89
Tangible Equity to Tangible Assets (end of period)	10.34			9.42
* Annualized

Table of Contents

We have traditionally disclosed certain non-GAAP ratios to evaluate and measure our financial condition, including our ROATE and the ratio of our tangible equity to tangible assets. We believe these ratios provide investors with information regarding our financial condition and results of operations and how we evaluate them internally.

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP equivalents.



	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2014			2013
Net Income:
Net income	$	4,753		$	4,531
Plus: Intangible amortization, net of tax ⁽¹⁾	89			110
Adjusted net income	$	4,842		$	4,641
Average Tangible Equity:
Average total shareholders' equity	$	185,297		$	177,609
Less: Average intangibles	(8,586		)	(9,203		)
Average tangible equity	$	176,711		$	168,406
ROATE (annualized)	10.99		%	11.05		%
(1) Computed on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate 35%.



	As of June 30,
(in thousands)	2014		2013
Tangible Equity:
Total shareholders' equity	186,516		172,283
Less: Intangibles	(8,532	)	(9,137	)
Tangible equity	177,984		163,146
Tangible Assets:
Total assets	1,729,907		1,741,884
Less: Intangibles	(8,532	)	(9,137	)
Tangible assets	1,721,375		1,732,747
Tangible Equity/Tangible Assets	10.34	%	9.42	%

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the difference between interest income and fees earned on earning assets and interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities. Interest rate levels and volume fluctuations within earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities impact net interest income. Net interest margin is net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.

Certain assets with tax favorable treatment are evaluated on a tax-equivalent basis. Tax-equivalent basis assumes a federal income tax rate of 35%. Tax favorable assets generally have lower contractual pretax yields than fully taxable assets. A tax-equivalent analysis is performed by adding the tax savings to the earnings on tax-favorable assets. After factoring in the tax-favorable effects of these assets, the yields may be more appropriately evaluated against alternative earning assets. In addition to yield, various other risks are factored into the evaluation process.

Our net interest income for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 increased $0.2 million to $13.8 million compared with $13.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Our total interest income of $16.2 million was $0.6 million lower in the second quarter of 2014 compared with the same period in 2013. Despite increases in loan balances, loan interest income decreased $0.3 million, or 2.2%, to $12.0 million for the second quarter of 2014, compared to $12.3 million for the same period of 2013, due to new and renewing loans being made at lower interest rates than those paying down. Income from investment securities decreased to $3.6 million for the second quarter of 2014 compared to $3.9 million for the second quarter of 2013, due to a $55.6 million decrease in the average balance of investment securities between the two comparable periods, and despite an increase in the yield. Income from loan pool participations was $0.5 million for the second quarter of 2014, a decrease of $0.1 million compared to the same period a year ago, on an average level of investment that was $8.9 million less in the second quarter of 2014 than the comparable period of 2013. The Company continues to exit this line of business as balances pay down. Total interest expense for the second quarter of 2014 decreased $0.8 million, or 26.5%, compared with the same period in 2013, due primarily to lower average interest rates in 2014. Our net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis for the second quarter of 2014 increased to 3.61% compared with 3.43% in the second quarter of 2013. Net interest margin is a measure of the net return on interest-earning assets and is computed by dividing annualized net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis by the average of total interest-earning assets for the period.

Table of Contents

Our overall yield on earning assets was relatively stable at 4.17% for the second quarter of 2014 from 4.18% for the second quarter of 2013. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased in the second quarter of 2014 to 0.69% from 0.92% for the second quarter of 2013, due to the continued repricing of new time certificates, and lower interest rates on long-term debt.

The following table shows the consolidated average balance sheets, detailing the major categories of assets and liabilities, the interest income earned on interest-earning assets, the interest expense paid for the interest-bearing liabilities, and the related yields and interest rates for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Dividing annualized income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities results in average yields or costs. Average information is provided on a daily average basis.



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2014							2013
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rate/ Yield		Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rate/ Yield
(dollars in thousands)
Average Earning Assets:
Loans ^(1)(2)(3)	$	1,083,978		$	12,283	4.55	%	$	1,059,118		$	12,463	4.72	%
Loan pool participations ⁽⁴⁾	24,812			532		8.60		33,677			610		7.27
Investment securities:
Taxable investments	366,118			2,274		2.49		425,872			2,546		2.40
Tax exempt investments ⁽²⁾	168,094			2,078		4.96		163,908			1,925		4.71
Total investment securities	534,212			4,352		3.27		589,780			4,471		3.04
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing balances	9,044			5		0.22		2,984			1		0.13
Total interest-earning assets	$	1,652,046		$	17,172	4.17	%	$	1,685,559		$	17,545	4.18	%

Cash and due from banks	18,895							20,968
Premises and equipment	31,184							25,738
Allowance for loan losses	(18,630		)					(18,488		)
Other assets	57,859							59,699
Total assets	$	1,741,354						$	1,773,476

Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits	$	705,853		$	583	0.33	%	$	674,547		$	635	0.38	%
Certificates of deposit	450,558			1,083		0.96		482,214			1,690		1.41
Total deposits	1,156,411			1,666		0.58		1,156,761			2,325		0.81
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements	59,937			34		0.23		61,205			47		0.31
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	107,559			545		2.03		146,501			705		1.93
Long-term debt and other	15,917			76		1.92		16,014			82		2.05
Total borrowed funds	183,413			655		1.43		223,720			834		1.50
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,339,824		$	2,321	0.69	%	$	1,380,481		$	3,159	0.92	%

Net interest spread⁽²⁾						3.48	%						3.26	%

Demand deposits	204,903							202,741
Other liabilities	11,330							12,645
Shareholders' equity	185,297							177,609
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,741,354						$	1,773,476

Interest income/earning assets ⁽²⁾	$	1,652,046		$	17,172	4.17	%	$	1,685,559		$	17,545	4.18	%
Interest expense/earning assets	$	1,652,046		$	2,321	0.56	%	$	1,685,559		$	3,159	0.75	%
Net interest margin ⁽²⁾⁽⁵⁾				$	14,851	3.61	%				$	14,386	3.43	%

Non-GAAP to GAAP Reconciliation:
Tax Equivalent Adjustment:
Loans				$	278						$	186
Securities				718							591
Total tax equivalent adjustment				996							777
Net Interest Income				$	13,855						$	13,609



	(1)	Loan fees included in interest income are not material.
	(2)	Computed on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 35%.
	(3)	Non-accrual loans have been included in average loans, net of unearned discount.
	(4)	Includes interest income and discount realized on loan pool participations.
	(5)	Net interest margin is tax-equivalent net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth an analysis of volume and rate changes in interest income and interest expense on our average earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities during the three months ended June 30, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, reported on a fully tax-equivalent basis assuming a 35% tax rate. The table distinguishes between the changes related to average outstanding balances (changes in volume holding the initial interest rate constant) and the changes related to average interest rates (changes in average rate holding the initial outstanding balance constant). The change in interest due to both volume and rate has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2014 Compared to 2013 Change due to
	Volume			Rate/Yield			Net
(in thousands)
Increase (decrease) in interest income:
Loans, tax equivalent	$	1,350		$	(1,530	)	$	(180	)
Loan pool participations	(575		)	497			(78		)
Investment securities:
Taxable investments	(820		)	548			(272		)
Tax exempt investments	50			103			153
Total investment securities	(770		)	651			(119		)
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing balances	3			1			4
Change in interest income	8			(381		)	(373		)
Increase (decrease) in interest expense:
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits	162			(214		)	(52		)
Certificates of deposit	(104		)	(503		)	(607		)
Total deposits	58			(717		)	(659		)
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements	(1		)	(12		)	(13		)
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	(379		)	219			(160		)
Other long-term debt	(1		)	(5		)	(6		)
Total borrowed funds	(381		)	202			(179		)
Change in interest expense	(323		)	(515		)	(838		)
Increase in net interest income	$	331		$	134		$	465
Percentage decrease in net interest income over prior period							3.2		%

Interest income and fees on loans on a tax-equivalent basis decreased $0.2 million, or 1.4%, in the second quarter of 2014 compared with the same period in 2013. Average loans were $24.9 million, or 2.3%, higher in the second quarter of 2014 compared with 2013. We believe the increase in average loan balances was attributable to a gradual improvement in general economic conditions, resulting in the willingness of borrowers to consider incurring more debt to support growth in their businesses. The yield on our loan portfolio is affected by the amount of nonaccrual loans (which do not earn interest income), the mix of the portfolio (real estate loans generally have a lower overall yield than commercial and agricultural loans), the effects of competition and the interest rate environment on the amounts and volumes of new loan originations, and the mix of variable-rate versus fixed-rate loans in our portfolio. The average rate on loans decreased from 4.72% in the second quarter of 2013 to 4.55% in second quarter of 2014, primarily due to new and renewing loans being made at lower interest rates than those paying down.

Interest and discount income on loan pool participations was $0.5 million for the second quarter of 2014, a decrease of $0.1 million, or 12.8%, from $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2013. The Company entered into this business upon consummation of its merger with the Former MidWestOne in March 2008. These loan pool participations are investments in pools of performing, subperforming and nonperforming loans purchased at varying discounts to the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the underlying loans. The loan pool participations are held and serviced by a third-party independent servicing corporation, and the amount of income received from them can vary widely due to unpredictable payment collections and loss recoveries. The decrease in average loan pool volume was due to loan pay downs and charge-offs, and is expected to continue as the Company exits this line of business. We have minimal exposure in the loan pool participations to consumer real estate, subprime credit or construction and real estate development loans. Average loan pool participations were $8.9 million, or 26.3%, lower in the second quarter of 2014 compared with 2013.

Income is derived from this investment in the form of interest collected and the repayment of principal in excess of the purchase cost, which is referred to as “discount recovery.” The loan pool participations were historically a high-yield activity, but this yield has fluctuated from period to period based on the amount of cash collections, discount recovery, and net collection expenses of the servicer in any given period. The net “all-in” yield on loan pool participations was 8.60% for the second quarter

Table of Contents

of 2014, up from 7.27% for the same period of 2013. The net yield was higher in the second quarter of 2014 than for the second quarter of 2013 primarily due to the stable payment activity and slightly higher gains on the sale of foreclosed real estate properties in the portfolio at a value greater than their net book value, a trend we do not expect to continue in the future.

Interest income on investment securities on a tax-equivalent basis totaled $4.4 million in the second quarter of 2014 compared with $4.5 million for the same period of 2013. The average balance of investments in the second quarter of 2014 was $534.2 million compared with $589.8 million in the second quarter of 2013, a decrease of $55.6 million, or 9.4%. The decrease in average balance resulted primarily from using proceeds from the sale and maturity of securities for increased loan originations, and funding the net outflow of deposits and decreasing borrowed funds balances. The tax-equivalent yield on our investment portfolio in the second quarter of 2014 increased to 3.27% from 3.04% in the comparable period of 2013, reflecting the sale of our remaining CDO portfolio holdings in the first quarter of 2014 which had essentially no yield, and a greater percentage of the portfolio being held in higher yielding (on a tax-adjusted basis) tax-exempt securities.

Interest expense on deposits was $0.7 million, or 28.3%, lower in the second quarter of 2014 compared with the same period in 2013, mainly due to the decrease in interest rates being paid during 2014. The weighted average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits was 0.58% in the second quarter of 2014 compared with 0.81% in the second quarter of 2013. This decline reflects the overall reduction in interest rates on deposits throughout the markets in which we operate, and the gradual downward repricing of time deposits as higher rate certificates mature. Average interest-bearing deposits for the second quarter of 2014 decreased $0.4 million, compared with the same period in 2013, due to depositors choosing other savings and investing alternatives over lower-yielding deposit accounts.

Interest expense on borrowed funds of $0.7 million was $0.2 million lower in the second quarter of 2014 compared with the same period in 2013. Average borrowed funds for the second quarter of 2014 were $40.3 million lower compared with the same period in 2013. This decrease was due to decreases in the level of FHLB borrowing and repurchase agreements. The weighted average rate on borrowed funds decreased to 1.43% for the second quarter of 2014 compared with 1.50% for the second quarter of 2013, reflecting the replacement of maturing higher-rate borrowings with those in the current lower-rate environment.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is a current charge against income and represents an amount which management believes is sufficient to maintain an adequate allowance for known and probable losses. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management considers the size and quality of the loan portfolio measured against prevailing economic conditions, regulatory guidelines, historical loan loss experience and credit quality of the portfolio. When a determination is made by management to charge off a loan balance, such write-off is charged against the allowance for loan losses.

We recorded a provision for loan losses of $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2014, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 50.0%, from $0.6 million in the second quarter of 2013. Net loans charged off in the second quarter of 2014 totaled $0.3 million, level with net loans charged off of $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2013. We determine an appropriate provision based on our evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses in relationship to a continuing review of problem loans, current economic conditions, actual loss experience and industry trends. We believe that the allowance for loan losses was adequate based on the inherent risk in the portfolio as of June 30, 2014; however, there is no assurance losses will not exceed the allowance and any growth in the loan portfolio, and the uncertainty of the general economy may require additional provisions in future periods as deemed necessary.

Sensitive assets include nonaccrual loans, loans on the Bank's watch loan reports and other loans identified as having higher potential for loss. We review sensitive assets on at least a quarterly basis for changes in the customers' ability to pay and changes in the valuation of underlying collateral in order to estimate probable losses. We also periodically review a watch loan list which is comprised of loans that have been restructured or involve customers in industries which have been adversely affected by market conditions. The majority of these loans are being repaid in conformance with their contracts.

Table of Contents

Noninterest Income



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			$ Change			% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Trust, investment, and insurance fees	$	1,430		$	1,423		$	7		0.5	%
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts	848			743			105			14.1
Mortgage origination and loan servicing fees	318			717			(399		)	(55.6	)
Other service charges, commissions and fees	552			596			(44		)	(7.4	)
Bank-owned life insurance income	225			230			(5		)	(2.2	)
Gain on sale or call of available for sale securities	191			4			187			NM
Loss on sale of premises and equipment	(8		)	—			(8		)	NM
Total noninterest income	$	3,556		$	3,713		$	(157	)	(4.2	)%
Noninterest income as a % of total revenue*	19.6		%	21.4		%
NM - Percentage change not considered meaningful.
* Total revenue is net interest income plus noninterest income excluding gain/loss on securities and premises and equipment and impairment of investment securities.

Total noninterest income decreased $0.2 million for the second quarter of 2014 compared with the same period for 2013. The decrease in 2014 was primarily due to a decrease in mortgage origination and loan servicing fees of $0.4 million, or 55.6%, to $0.3 million for the second quarter of 2014, compared to $0.7 million for the same quarter of 2013. The decline was primarily due to a decrease in loans originated for sale on the secondary market, as the demand for mortgage refinancing continued to decline. The decrease was partially offset by a $0.2 million increase in gain on sale of investment securities for the second quarter of 2014, and increased service charges and fees on deposit accounts of $0.8 million for the second quarter of 2014, an improvement of $0.1 million, or 14.1%, relative to the second quarter of 2013. Gains on the sale of investment securities increased due to management efforts to restructure the portfolio. The increased service charges and fees on deposit accounts was mainly due to a decrease in waived service charges on demand deposit accounts due to a heightened management focus on retaining fee income.

Management's strategic goal is for noninterest income to constitute 30% of total revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income excluding gain/loss on securities and premises and equipment and impairment of investment securities) over time. For the three months ended June 30, 2014, noninterest income comprised 19.6% of total revenues, compared with 21.4% for the same period in 2013. While our emphasis on trust, investment, and insurance fees, as well as service charges and fees on deposit accounts, has shown some improvement in these categories of noninterest income, the effects of decreased mortgage origination and loan servicing fees, and other service charges, commissions and fees, has significantly inhibited material improvement. Management continues to evaluate options for increasing noninterest income.

Noninterest Expense



	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		$ Change			% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	6,060	$	6,173	$	(113	)	(1.8	)%
Net occupancy and equipment expense	1,634		1,538		96			6.2
Professional fees	779		718		61			8.5
Data processing expense	391		337		54			16.0
FDIC insurance expense	240		296		(56		)	(18.9	)
Amortization of intangible assets	137		166		(29		)	(17.5	)
Other operating expense	1,398		1,357		41			3.0
Total noninterest expense	$	10,639	$	10,585	$	54		0.5	%

Noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2014 was $10.6 million, virtually unchanged from the second quarter of 2013. Slight decreases in salaries and employee benefits and FDIC insurance expense were offset by similar aggregate increases in net occupancy and equipment expense, professional fees, and data processing expense for the second quarter of 2014, compared with the second quarter of 2013.

Table of Contents

Income Tax Expense

Our effective tax rate, or income taxes divided by income before taxes, was 26.6% for the second quarter of 2014, slightly higher than 26.2% for the second quarter of 2013. Income tax expense increased $0.1 million to $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2014 compared with $1.6 million income tax expense for the same period of 2013 primarily due to increased taxable net income.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013

Summary

For the six months ended June 30, 2014, we earned net income of $9.7 million, compared with $9.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013, an increase of 4.3%. Basic and diluted earnings per common share for the first half of 2014 were $1.15 and $1.14, respectively, versus $1.10 and $1.09, respectively, in the first half of 2013. Our annualized ROAA for the first six months of 2014 was 1.12% compared with 1.06% for the same period in 2013. Our annualized ROAE was 10.70% for the six months ended June 30, 2014 versus 10.65% for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The annualized ROATE was 11.44% for the first half of 2014 compared with 11.50% for the same period in 2013.

The following table presents selected financial results and measures for the first half of 2014 and 2013.



	As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30,
($ amounts in thousands)	2014			2013
Net Income	$	9,726		$	9,321
Average Assets	1,744,221			1,774,199
Average Shareholders' Equity	183,297			176,418
Return on Average Assets* (ROAA)	1.12		%	1.06		%
Return on Average Shareholders' Equity* (ROAE)	10.70			10.65
Return on Average Tangible Equity* (ROATE)	11.44			11.50
Total Equity to Assets (end of period)	10.78			9.89
Tangible Equity to Tangible Assets (end of period)	10.34			9.42
* Annualized

The following tables provide a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the most comparable GAAP equivalents.



	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2014			2013
Net Income:
Net income	$	9,726		$	9,321
Plus: Intangible amortization, net of tax ⁽¹⁾	178			219
Adjusted net income	$	9,904		$	9,540
Average Tangible Equity:
Average total shareholders' equity	$	183,297		$	176,418
Less: Average intangibles	(8,641		)	(9,270		)
Average tangible equity	$	174,656		$	167,148
ROATE (annualized)	11.44		%	11.50		%
(1) Computed on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 35%.

Table of Contents



	As of June 30,
(in thousands)	2014			2013
Tangible Equity:
Total shareholders' equity	$	186,516		$	172,283
Less: Intangibles	(8,532		)	(9,137		)
Tangible equity	$	177,984		$	163,146
Tangible Assets:
Total assets	$	1,729,907		$	1,741,884
Less: Intangibles	(8,532		)	(9,137		)
Tangible assets	$	1,721,375		$	1,732,747
Tangible Equity/Tangible Assets	10.34		%	9.42		%

Net Interest Income

Our net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $27.4 million, virtually unchanged from the six months ended June 30, 2013. Our total interest income of $32.1 million was $1.9 million lower in the first half of 2014 compared with the same period in 2013. The decrease in total interest income was driven by a decrease in loan pool participation income. Loan pool participation income is accounted for on a cash basis when actual payments are received, which can cause income related to this item to vary widely from period to period. Interest income on investment securities decreased $0.5 million, or 6.9%, to $7.3 million for the first six months of 2014. The decrease was due to a lower average balance of investment securities during the first half of 2014 compared to the same period of 2013, and was despite an increase in yield. Income from loans decreased from $24.4 million in the first half of 2013 to $23.9 million in the first half of 2014 due to new and renewing loans being made at lower interest rates than those paying down and despite a higher average balance. The decrease in total interest income was largely offset by reduced interest expense on deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities, including FHLB borrowings. Total interest expense for the first half of 2014 decreased $1.8 million, or 28.1%, compared with the same period in 2013, due primarily to the maturity of higher rate certificates of deposit. Our net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis for the first half of 2014 improved to 3.59% compared with 3.47% for the first half of 2013. Net interest margin is a measure of the net return on interest-earning assets and is computed by dividing annualized net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis by the average of total interest-earning assets for the period. Our overall yield on earning assets declined to 4.16% for the first half of 2014 from 4.25% for the first half of 2013. This decline was due primarily to lower average yields on loans and loan pool participations. The average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased in the first six months of 2014 to 0.71% from 0.95% for the first six months of 2013, due to the continued repricing of new time deposits and other interest-bearing liabilities, including FHLB borrowings, at lower interest rates.

Table of Contents

The following table shows the consolidated average balance sheets, detailing the major categories of assets and liabilities, the interest income earned on interest-earning assets, the interest expense paid for interest-bearing liabilities, and the related yields and interest rates for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. Dividing annualized income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities results in average yields or costs. Average information is provided on a daily average basis.



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014							2013
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rate/ Yield		Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rate/ Yield
(dollars in thousands)
Average Earning Assets:
Loans ^(1)(2)(3)	$	1,083,227		$	24,497	4.56	%	$	1,046,907		$	24,771	4.77	%
Loan pool participations ⁽⁴⁾	25,931			812		6.31		35,125			1,690		9.70
Investment securities:
Taxable investments	369,125			4,590		2.51		433,056			5,176		2.41
Tax exempt investments ⁽²⁾	168,227			4,188		5.02		165,144			3,890		4.75
Total investment securities	537,352			8,778		3.29		598,200			9,066		3.06
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing balances	7,929			9		0.23		5,325			6		0.23
Total interest-earning assets	$	1,654,439		$	34,096	4.16	%	$	1,685,557		$	35,533	4.25	%

Cash and due from banks	19,238							21,504
Premises and equipment	30,004							25,657
Allowance for loan losses	(18,561		)					(18,438		)
Other assets	59,101							59,919
Total assets	$	1,744,221						$	1,774,199

Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits	$	703,289		$	1,164	0.33	%	$	675,227		$	1,342	0.40	%
Certificates of deposit	452,225			2,225		0.99		503,964			3,562		1.43
Total deposits	1,155,514			3,389		0.59		1,179,191			4,904		0.84
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements	60,144			65		0.22		62,266			92		0.30
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	107,972			1,107		2.07		134,247			1,397		2.10
Long-term debt and other	15,930			154		1.95		16,026			165		2.08
Total borrowed funds	184,046			1,326		1.45		212,539			1,654		1.57
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	1,339,560		$	4,715	0.71	%	$	1,391,730		$	6,558	0.95	%

Net interest spread⁽²⁾						3.45	%						3.30	%

Demand deposits	209,773							192,545
Other liabilities	11,591							13,506
Shareholders' equity	183,297							176,418
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,744,221						$	1,774,199

Interest income/earning assets ⁽²⁾	$	1,654,439		$	34,096	4.16	%	$	1,685,557		$	35,533	4.25	%
Interest expense/earning assets	$	1,654,439		$	4,715	0.57	%	$	1,685,557		$	6,558	0.78	%
Net interest margin ⁽²⁾⁽⁵⁾				$	29,381	3.59	%				$	28,975	3.47	%

Non-GAAP to GAAP Reconciliation:
Tax Equivalent Adjustment:
Loans				$	552						$	380
Securities				1,447							1,195
Total tax equivalent adjustment				1,999							1,575
Net Interest Income				$	27,382						$	27,400



	(1)	Loan fees included in interest income are not material.
	(2)	Computed on a tax-equivalent basis, assuming a federal income tax rate of 35%.
	(3)	Non-accrual loans have been included in average loans, net of unearned discount.
	(4)	Includes interest income and discount realized on loan pool participations.
	(5)	Net interest margin is tax-equivalent net interest income as a percentage of average earning assets.

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth an analysis of volume and rate changes in interest income and interest expense on our average earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities during the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to the same period in 2013, reported on a fully tax-equivalent basis assuming a 35% tax rate. The table distinguishes between the changes related to average outstanding balances (changes in volume holding the initial interest rate constant) and the changes related to average interest rates (changes in average rate holding the initial outstanding balance constant). The change in interest due to both volume and rate has been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in each.



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014 Compared to 2013 Change due to
	Volume			Rate/Yield			Net
(in thousands)
Increase (decrease) in interest income:
Loans, tax equivalent	$	1,817		$	(2,091	)	$	(274	)
Loan pool participations	(376		)	(502		)	(878		)
Investment securities:
Taxable investments	(1,134		)	548			(586		)
Tax exempt investments	74			224			298
Total investment securities	(1,060		)	772			(288		)
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing balances	3			—			3
Change in interest income	384			(1,821		)	(1,437		)
Increase (decrease) in interest expense:
Savings and interest-bearing demand deposits	147			(325		)	(178		)
Certificates of deposit	(334		)	(1,003		)	(1,337		)
Total deposits	(187		)	(1,328		)	(1,515		)
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements	(3		)	(24		)	(27		)
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings	(270		)	(20		)	(290		)
Other long-term debt	(1		)	(10		)	(11		)
Total borrowed funds	(274		)	(54		)	(328		)
Change in interest expense	(461		)	(1,382		)	(1,843		)
Change in net interest income	$	845		$	(439	)	$	406
Percentage change in net interest income over prior period							1.4		%

Interest income and fees on loans on a tax-equivalent basis decreased $0.3 million, or 1.1%, in the first half of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. Average loans were $36.3 million, or 3.5%, higher in the first half of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. We believe the increase in average loan balances was attributable to a gradual improvement in general economic conditions, resulting in the willingness of borrowers to consider incurring more debt to support growth in their businesses. The yield on our loan portfolio is affected by the amount of nonaccrual loans (which do not earn interest income), the mix of the portfolio (real estate loans generally have a lower overall yield than commercial and agricultural loans), the effects of competition and the interest rate environment on the amounts and volumes of new loan originations, and the mix of variable-rate versus fixed-rate loans in our portfolio. The average rate on loans decreased from 4.77% in the first half of 2013 to 4.56% in the first half of 2014, primarily due to new and renewing loans being made at lower interest rates than those paying down.

Interest and discount income on loan pool participations was $0.8 million for the first half of 2014 compared with $1.7 million for the first half of 2013, a decrease of $0.9 million. Average loan pool participations were $9.2 million, or 26.2%, lower in the first half of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. The decrease in average loan pool volume was due to loan pay downs and charge-offs, and is expected to continue as the Company exits this line of business.

The net “all-in” yield on loan pool participations was 6.31% for the first half of 2014, down from 9.70% for the same period of 2013. Loan pool participation income is accounted for on a cash basis when actual payments are received, which can cause income related to this item to vary widely from period to period. As the percentage of creditworthy borrowers in the portfolio continues to decrease, we expect returns to generally trend lower.

Interest income on investment securities on a tax-equivalent basis totaled $8.8 million in the first six months of 2014 compared with $9.1 million for the same period of 2013. The average balance of investments in the first half of 2014 was $537.4 million compared with $598.2 million in the first half of 2013, a decrease of $60.8 million, or 10.2%. The decrease in average balance resulted primarily from the use of proceeds from maturing investment securities to originate loans, to fund the net outflow of deposits, and to reduce FHLB borrowings. The tax-equivalent yield on our investment portfolio for the first half of 2014 increased

Table of Contents

to 3.29% from 3.06% in the comparable period of 2013, reflecting the sale of our remaining CDO portfolio holdings in the first quarter of 2014 which had essentially no yield, and a greater percentage of the portfolio being held in higher yielding (on a tax-adjusted basis) tax-exempt securities.

Interest expense on deposits was $1.5 million, or 30.9%, lower in the first six months of 2014 compared with the same period in 2013, mainly due to the decrease in interest rates being paid during 2014. The weighted average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits was 0.59% for the first half of 2014 compared with 0.84% for the first half of 2013. This decline reflects the overall reduction in interest rates on deposits throughout the markets in which we operate, and the gradual downward repricing of time deposits as higher rate certificates mature. Average interest-bearing deposits for the first six months of 2014 decreased $23.7 million, or 2.0%, compared with the same period in 2013.

Interest expense on borrowed funds was $0.3 million lower in the first six months of 2014 compared with the same period in 2013. Interest on borrowed funds totaled $1.3 million for the first half of 2014. Average borrowed funds for the first half of 2014 were $28.5 million lower compared with the same period in 2013. This decrease was due primarily to a decrease in the level of FHLB borrowings. The weighted average rate on borrowed funds decreased to 1.45% for the first half of 2014 compared with 1.57% for the first half of 2013, reflecting the repayment of maturing higher-rate borrowings.

Provision for Loan Losses

We recorded a provision for loan losses of $0.8 million in the first half of 2014, level with a $0.8 million provision in the first half of 2013. Net loans charged off in the first half of 2014 totaled $0.5 million compared with $0.2 million in the first half of 2013. The increased loan charge offs reflects the effect of a significant loan loss recovery in the first quarter of 2013, an event that was not repeated in 2014.

Noninterest Income



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014			2013			$ Change			% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Trust, investment, and insurance fees	$	2,948		$	2,772		$	176		6.3	%
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts	1,476			1,450			26			1.8
Mortgage origination and loan servicing fees	755			1,761			(1,006		)	(57.1	)
Other service charges, commissions and fees	1,171			1,168			3			0.3
Bank-owned life insurance income	454			461			(7		)	(1.5	)
Gain on sale or call of available for sale securities	974			84			890			NM
Loss on sale of premises and equipment	(5		)	(2		)	(3		)	150.0
Total noninterest income	$	7,773		$	7,694		$	79		1.0	%
Noninterest income as a % of total revenue*	19.9		%	21.7		%
NM - Percentage change not considered meaningful.
* Total revenue is net interest income plus noninterest income excluding gain/loss on securities and premises and equipment and impairment of investment securities.

Total noninterest income increased $0.1 million for the first half of 2014 compared with the same period for 2013. The increase in 2014 was primarily due to net gains on the sale of available for sale securities for the first six months of 2014 increasing $0.9 million to $1.0 million, from $0.1 million for the same period of 2013. This increase was primarily due to gains realized on the sale of our remaining CDO investment securities in an improved market environment. Trust, investment, and insurance fees increased by $0.2 million, or 6.3%, to $2.9 million during the first half of 2014, compared with $2.7 million in the same period of 2013, primarily as a result of increased investment center fee income.

These increases were partially offset by a decrease in mortgage origination and loan servicing fees to $0.8 million, a decline of $1.0 million, or 57.1%, from $1.8 million in the first half of 2013, mainly due to a decrease in loans originated for sale on the secondary market, as the demand for mortgage refinancing continued to decline. Management's strategic goal is for noninterest income to constitute 30% of total revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income excluding gain/loss on securities and premises and equipment and impairment of investment securities) over time. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, noninterest income comprised 19.9% of total revenues, compared with 21.7% for the same period in 2013. While our emphasis on trust, investment, and insurance fees, as well as service charges and fees on deposit accounts, has shown some improvement in this category of noninterest income, the effects of decreased origination of mortgage loans for sale on the secondary market and stable service charges and fees on deposit accounts have significantly inhibited material improvement. Management continues to evaluate options for increasing noninterest income.

Table of Contents

Noninterest Expense



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2014		2013		$ Change			% Change
(dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	12,194	$	12,466	$	(272	)	(2.2	)%
Net occupancy and equipment expense	3,239		3,226		13			0.4
Professional fees	1,354		1,401		(47		)	(3.4	)
Data processing expense	815		728		87			12.0
FDIC insurance expense	483		590		(107		)	(18.1	)
Amortization of intangible assets	274		332		(58		)	(17.5	)
Other operating expense	2,672		2,836		(164		)	(5.8	)
Total noninterest expense	$	21,031	$	21,579	$	(548	)	(2.5	)%

Noninterest expense for the first half of 2014 was $21.0 million compared with $21.6 million for the first half of 2013, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 2.5%. With the exception of small increases in data processing and net occupancy and equipment expense, all other noninterest expense categories experienced a decline for the first half of 2014, compared with the same period of 2013, due primarily to expense control measures.

Income Tax Expense

Our effective tax rate, or income taxes divided by income before taxes, was 27.3% for the first half of 2014, and 26.7% for the first half of 2013. Income tax expense increased to $3.6 million in the first half of 2014 compared with $3.4 million for the same period of 2013, primarily due to increased taxable net income.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Our total assets decreased to $1.73 billion as of June 30, 2014 from $1.76 billion at December 31, 2013, primarily as a result of decreased investment securities available for sale, deferred income taxes, and loan pool participations. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in investment securities held to maturity and net premises and equipment. Deposits, Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings and securities sold under agreements to repurchase all declined. Total deposits at June 30, 2014, declined to $1.35 billion, a decrease of $27.3 million, or 2.0%, from December 31, 2013, while FHLB borrowings decreased $3.0 million, or 2.8%, to $103.9 million. The deposit decrease was concentrated in both interest-bearing and non-interest bearing checking accounts, and also in certificates of deposit under $100,000, while jumbo certificate of deposit ($100,000 and over) accounts and savings accounts showed an increase. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase decreased $3.9 million to $57.3 million at June 30, 2014, from $61.2 million at December 31, 2013, while federal funds purchased decreased from $5.5 million at December 31, 2013 to $4.7 million at June 30, 2014.

Investment Securities

Investment securities available for sale totaled $472.1 million as of June 30, 2014. This was a decrease of $26.4 million, or 5.3%, from December 31, 2013. Investment securities serve as a source of liquidity, and investment balances vary along with fluctuations in levels of deposits and loans. Investment securities classified as held to maturity increased to $42.7 million as of June 30, 2014 from $32.6 million at December 31, 2013. The $10.1 million, or 30.9%, increase in held to maturity investments was due to a strategic decision to increase our holdings in this classification, to mitigate any volatility in capital levels that may result from future rises in interest rates. The investment portfolio consisted mainly of obligations of states and political subdivisions (44.8%), mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations (37.7%), and U.S. government agencies (9.6%).

As of December 31, 2013, we owned CDOs with an amortized cost of $2.1 million that were backed by pools of trust preferred securities issued by various commercial banks (approximately 80%) and insurance companies (approximately 20%). During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, we sold these investment securities for a net gain of $0.8 million. As a result, as of June 30, 2014, we did not own any CDOs.

Table of Contents

Loans

The composition of the bank loans (before deducting the allowance for loan losses), was as follows:



	June 30, 2014				December 31, 2013
	Balance		% of Total		Balance		% of Total
(dollars in thousands)
Agricultural	$	89,503	8.3	%	$	97,167	8.9	%
Commercial and industrial	281,331		25.9		262,368		24.1
Credit cards	1,236		0.1		1,028		0.1
Overdrafts	444		0.1		537		0.1
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	71,085		6.5		72,589		6.6
Farmland	83,308		7.7		85,475		7.9
Multifamily	55,781		5.1		55,443		5.1
Commercial real estate-other	214,790		19.8		220,917		20.3
Total commercial real estate	424,964		39.1		434,424		39.9
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	217,637		20.0		220,668		20.3
One- to four- family junior liens	52,127		4.8		53,458		4.9
Total residential real estate	269,764		24.8		274,126		25.2
Consumer	18,679		1.7		18,762		1.7
Total loans	$	1,085,921	100.0	%	$	1,088,412	100.0	%

Total bank loans (excluding loan pool participations and loans held for sale) decreased by $2.5 million, to $1.09 billion as of June 30, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013. This decrease was primarily in agricultural loans, other commercial real estate loans, farmland loans, and one- to four- family first liens. Decreases in these categories were partially offset by an increase in commercial and industrial loans. As of June 30, 2014, our bank loan (excluding loan pool participations) to deposit ratio was 80.6% compared with a bank loan to deposit ratio of 79.2% at December 31, 2013. We anticipate that the loan to deposit ratio will remain relatively stable or increase in future periods, with loans showing overall measured growth and deposits remaining steady or decreasing with interest rates remaining at record lows.

We have minimal direct exposure to subprime mortgages in our loan portfolio. Our loan policy provides a guideline that real estate mortgage borrowers have a Beacon score of 640 or greater. Exceptions to this guideline have been noted but the overall exposure is deemed minimal by management. Mortgages we originate and sell on the secondary market are typically underwritten according to the guidelines of secondary market investors. These mortgages are sold on a non-recourse basis.

Loan Pool Participations

As of June 30, 2014, we had loan pool participations, net, totaling $21.5 million, down from $25.5 million at December 31, 2013. Loan pool participations are participation interests in performing, subperforming and nonperforming loans that have been purchased from various non-affiliated banking organizations. The Company entered into this business upon consummation of its merger with the Former MidWestOne in March 2008. As previously announced, the Company has decided to exit this line of business as current balances pay down. The loan pool investment balances shown as an asset on our consolidated balance sheets represent the discounted purchase cost of the loan pool participations. As of June 30, 2014, the categories of loans by collateral type in the loan pool participations were commercial real estate - 66%, commercial loans - 5%, single-family residential real estate - 15% and other loans - 14%. We have minimal exposure in the loan pool participations to consumer real estate subprime credit or to construction and real estate development loans.

Our overall cost basis in the loan pool participations represents a discount from the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the loans underlying the pools. For example, as of June 30, 2014, such cost basis was $23.6 million, while the contractual outstanding principal amount of the underlying loans as of such date was approximately $72.9 million, resulting in an investment basis of 32.4% of the "face amount" of the underlying loans. The discounted cost basis inherently reflects the assessed collectability of the underlying loans. We do not include any amounts related to the loan pool participations in our totals of nonperforming loans.

As of June 30, 2014, loans in the southeast region of the United States represented approximately 45% of our loan pool participations. The northeast was the next largest area with 33%, and the central region 22%. The southwest and the northwest regions represented a minimal amount of the portfolio at less than 1% combined. The highest concentration of assets was in Florida at approximately 18% of the basis total, with the next highest state levels being Ohio at approximately 13% and New Jersey at approximately 8%. As of June 30, 2014, approximately 72% of the loans were contractually current or less than 90 days past due,

Table of Contents

while 28% were contractually past due 90 days or more. It should be noted that many of the loans were acquired in a contractually past due status, which is reflected in the discounted purchase price of the loans. Performance status is monitored on a monthly basis. The 28% of loans contractually past due includes loans in litigation and foreclosed property. As of June 30, 2014, loans in litigation totaled approximately $1.4 million, while foreclosed property was approximately $3.3 million.

Premises and Equipment

As of June 30, 2014, premises and equipment totaled $32.5 million, an increase of $4.8 million, or 17.3%, from $27.7 million at December 31, 2013. This increase was primarily due to two ongoing major construction projects, both in our Iowa City market. In August 2013 we entered into a contract for the restoration and remodeling of the building which serves as the main office of the Bank and headquarters of the Company. The estimated cost of the restoration and remodeling is $13.8 million, and it is anticipated that the project will be completed in April 2016. In December 2013 we entered into a contract for the construction of a new Home Mortgage Center with an estimated cost of design and construction of $16.0 million, and with completion anticipated in the second quarter of 2015. We expect the balance of premises and equipment to continue rising in the future as these projects progress towards completion.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets decreased to $8.5 million as of June 30, 2014 from $8.8 million as of December 31, 2013 as a result of normal amortization. Amortization of intangible assets is recorded using an accelerated method based on the estimated life of the intangible.

The following table summarizes the amounts and carrying values of intangible assets as of June 30, 2014.



	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Unamortized Intangible Assets
(in thousands)
June 30, 2014
Intangible assets:
Insurance agency intangible	$	1,320	$	903	$	417
Core deposit premium	5,433		4,532		901
Trade name intangible	7,040		—		7,040
Customer list intangible	330		156		174
Total	$	14,123	$	5,591	$	8,532

Deposits

Total deposits as of June 30, 2014 were $1.35 billion compared with $1.37 billion as of December 31, 2013. Interest-bearing checking deposits were the largest category of deposits at June 30, 2014, representing approximately 42.9% of total deposits. Total interest-bearing checking deposits were $578.6 million at June 30, 2014, a decrease of $14.1 million, or 2.4%, from $592.7 million at December 31, 2013. Non-interest bearing demand deposits were $205.4 million at June 30, 2014, a decrease of $17.0 million, or 7.6%, from $222.4 million at December 31, 2013. The decreased balances in non-certificate deposit accounts were primarily in business and public funds accounts. Included in interest-bearing checking deposits at June 30, 2014 was $14.9 million of brokered deposits in the Insured Cash Sweep (ICS) program, a decrease of $21.0 million, or 58.4%, from the $35.9 million at December 31, 2013. Total certificates of deposit were $460.0 million at June 30, 2014, down $5.4 million, or 1.1%, from $465.4 million at December 31, 2013, as depositors continue to search for other savings and investing alternatives that deliver a higher return. Included in total certificates of deposit at June 30, 2014 was $9.3 million of brokered deposits in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program, a decrease of $3.5 million, or 27.6%, from the $12.9 million at December 31, 2013. Based on recent experience, management anticipates that many of the maturing certificates of deposit will not be renewed upon maturity. Approximately 83.8% of our total deposits were considered “core” deposits as of June 30, 2014.

Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings

FHLB borrowings totaled $103.9 million as of June 30, 2014 compared with $106.9 million as of December 31, 2013. We utilize FHLB borrowings as a supplement to customer deposits to fund earning assets and to assist in managing interest rate risk. Thus, if deposits decline, FHLB borrowing may increase to provide necessary liquidity.

Long-term Debt

Long-term debt in the form of junior subordinated debentures that have been issued to a statutory trust that issued trust preferred securities was $15.5 million as of June 30, 2014, unchanged from December 31, 2013. These junior subordinated debentures were assumed by us from Former MidWestOne in the merger. Former MidWestOne had issued these junior subordinated debentures on September 20, 2007, to MidWestOne Capital Trust II. The junior subordinated debentures supporting the trust

Table of Contents

preferred securities have a maturity date of December 15, 2037, and do not require any principal amortization. They became callable on December 15, 2012 at par, and are callable, in whole or in part, on any interest payment date, at the Company’s option. The interest rate on the debt is a variable rate based on the three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.59% with interest payable quarterly. At June 30, 2014, the interest rate on the debt was 1.82%.

Nonperforming Assets

The following table sets forth information concerning nonperforming loans by class of financing receivable at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



	90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing Interest		Restructured		Nonaccrual		Total
(in thousands)
June 30, 2014
Agricultural	$	6	$	3,027	$	26	$	3,059
Commercial and industrial	—		2,152		731		2,883
Credit cards	—		—		—		—
Overdrafts	—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	—		—		90		90
Farmland	—		2,268		26		2,294
Multifamily	—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate-other	34		256		1,448		1,738
Total commercial real estate	34		2,524		1,564		4,122
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	582		836		695		2,113
One- to four- family junior liens	—		13		135		148
Total residential real estate	582		849		830		2,261
Consumer	2		19		8		29
Total	$	624	$	8,571	$	3,159	$	12,354



	90 Days or More Past Due and Still Accruing Interest		Restructured		Nonaccrual		Total
(in thousands)
December 31, 2013
Agricultural	$	—	$	3,093	$	52	$	3,145
Commercial and industrial	213		2,350		746		3,309
Credit cards	17		—		—		17
Overdrafts	—		—		—		—
Commercial real estate:
Construction and development	—		—		139		139
Farmland	—		2,311		29		2,340
Multifamily	395		—		—		395
Commercial real estate-other	164		381		1,576		2,121
Total commercial real estate	559		2,692		1,744		4,995
Residential real estate:
One- to four- family first liens	540		982		543		2,065
One- to four- family junior liens	49		13		126		188
Total residential real estate	589		995		669		2,253
Consumer	7		21		29		57
Total	$	1,385	$	9,151	$	3,240	$	13,776

Our nonperforming assets totaled $14.2 million as of June 30, 2014, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 8.8%, from December 31, 2013. The balance of OREO at June 30, 2014 was $1.8 million, equal to the $1.8 million of OREO at December 31, 2013. All of

Table of Contents

the OREO property was acquired through foreclosures, and we are actively working to sell all properties held as of June 30, 2014. OREO is carried at appraised value less estimated cost of disposal at the date of acquisition. Additional discounts could be required to market and sell the properties, resulting in a write down through expense. Nonperforming loans totaled $12.4 million (1.14% of total bank loans) as of June 30, 2014, compared to $13.8 million (1.27% of total bank loans) as of December 31, 2013.

At June 30, 2014, nonperforming loans consisted of $3.2 million in nonaccrual loans, $8.6 million in TDRs and $0.6 million in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing. This compares with $3.2 million, $9.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2013. Nonaccrual loans were virtually unchanged at June 30, 2014 compared to December 31, 2013. The Company experienced a $0.6 million, or 6.3%, decrease in restructured loans, from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014, primarily resulting from the annual payments collected from three TDR-status borrowers as well as receiving payoffs from three other TDR-status borrowers. During the same period, loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest decreased $0.8 million, or 54.9%, from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014. This reduction was due to the net decrease of 15 loans from the 90 days or more and still accruing interest category, with 4 loans with a balance of $0.3 million being placed on nonaccrual, and the remainder either moving to past due 30 to 89 days, being brought current, or being paid off. Additionally, loans past due 30 to 89 days (not included in the nonperforming loan totals) were $5.6 million as of June 30, 2014 compared with $4.9 million as of December 31, 2013, an increase of $0.7 million or 14.6%.

Loan Review and Classification Process for Agricultural, Commercial and Industrial, and Commercial Real Estate Loans:

The Company maintains a loan review and classification process which involves multiple officers of the Company and is designed to assess the general quality of credit underwriting and to promote early identification of potential problem loans. All commercial and agricultural loan officers are charged with the responsibility of risk rating all loans in their portfolios and updating the ratings, positively or negatively, on an ongoing basis as conditions warrant. A monthly loan officer validation worksheet documents this process. Risk ratings are selected from an 8-point scale with ratings as follows: ratings 1- 4 Satisfactory (pass), rating 5 Watch (potential weakness), rating 6 Substandard (well-defined weakness), rating 7 Doubtful, and rating 8 Loss.

When a loan officer originates a new loan, based upon proper loan authorization, he or she documents the credit file with an offering sheet summary, supplemental underwriting analysis, relevant financial information and collateral evaluations. All of this information is used in the determination of the initial loan risk rating. The Company's loan review department undertakes independent credit reviews of relationships based on either criteria established by loan policy, risk-focused sampling, or random sampling. Loan policy requires the top 50 lending relationships by total exposure be reviewed no less than annually as well as all classified and Watch rated credits over $250,000. The individual loan reviews consider such items as: loan type; nature, type and estimated value of collateral; borrower and/or guarantor estimated financial strength; most recently available financial information; related loans and total borrower exposure; and current/anticipated performance of the loan. The results of such reviews are presented to executive management.

Through the review of delinquency reports, updated financial statements or other relevant information received in the normal course of business, the lending officer and/or loan review personnel may determine that a loan relationship has weakened to the point that a criticized (loan grade 5) or classified (loan grades 6 through 8) status is warranted. When a loan relationship with total related exposure of $1.0 million or greater is adversely graded (5 or above), or is classified as a TDR (regardless of size), the lending officer is then charged with preparing a Loan Strategy Summary worksheet that outlines the background of the credit problem, current repayment status of the loans, current collateral evaluation and a workout plan of action. This plan may include goals to improve the credit rating, assist the borrower in moving the loans to another institution and/or collateral liquidation. All such reports are first presented to regional management and then to the board of directors by the Executive Vice President, Chief Credit Officer (or a designee).

Depending upon the individual facts and circumstances and the result of the Classified/Watch review process, loan officers and/or loan review personnel may categorize the loan relationship as impaired. Once that determination has occurred, the loan officer, in conjunction with regional management, will complete an evaluation of the collateral (for collateral-dependent loans) based upon appraisals on file adjusting for current market conditions and other local factors that may affect collateral value. Loan review personnel may also complete an independent impairment analysis when deemed necessary. These judgmental evaluations may produce an initial specific allowance for placement in the Company's allowance for loan and lease losses calculation. As soon as practical, updated appraisals on the collateral backing that impaired loan relationship are ordered. When the updated appraisals are received, regional management, with assistance from the loan review department, reviews the appraisal and updates the specific allowance analysis for each loan relationship accordingly. The board of directors on a quarterly basis reviews the Classified/Watch reports including changes in credit grades of 5 or higher as well as all impaired loans, the related allowances and OREO.

In general, once the specific allowance has been finalized, regional and executive management will consider a charge-off prior to the calendar quarter-end in which that reserve calculation is finalized.

Table of Contents

The review process also provides for the upgrade of loans that show improvement since the last review.

Restructured Loans

We restructure loans for our customers who appear to be able to meet the terms of their loan over the long term, but who may be unable to meet the terms of the loan in the near term due to individual circumstances. We consider the customer's past performance, previous and current credit history, the individual circumstances surrounding the current difficulties and their plan to meet the terms of the loan in the future prior to restructuring the terms of the loan. All of the following factors are indicators that the Bank has granted a concession (one or multiple items may be present):


•	The borrower receives a reduction of the stated interest rate for the remaining original life of the debt.


•	The borrower receives an extension of the maturity date or dates at a stated interest rate lower than the current market interest rate for new debt with similar risk characteristics.


•	The borrower receives a reduction of the face amount or maturity amount of the debt as stated in the instrument or other agreement.


•	The borrower receives a deferral of required payments (principal and/or interest).


•	The borrower receives a reduction of the accrued interest.

Generally, loans are restructured through short-term interest rate relief, short-term principal payment relief or short-term principal and interest payment relief. Once a restructured loan has gone 90 days or more past due or is placed on nonaccrual status, it is included in the 90 days and over past due or nonaccrual totals in the previous table.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company restructured no loans by granting concessions to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.

We consider all TDRs, regardless of whether they are performing in accordance with their modified terms, to be impaired loans when determining our allowance for loan losses. A summary of restructured loans as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is as follows:



	June 30,		December 31,
	2014		2013
(in thousands)
Restructured Loans (TDRs):
In compliance with modified terms	$	8,571	$	9,151
Not in compliance with modified terms - on nonaccrual status	543		550
Total restructured loans	$	9,114	$	9,701

Allowance for Loan Losses

Our ALLL as of June 30, 2014 was $16.4 million, which was 1.51% of total bank loans (excluding loan pool participations) as of that date. This compares with an ALLL of $16.2 million as of December 31, 2013, which was 1.49% of total bank loans as of that date. Gross charge-offs for the first six months of 2014 totaled $0.7 million, while recoveries of previously charged-off loans totaled $0.2 million. Annualized net loan charge offs to average bank loans for the first six months of 2014 was 0.09% compared to 0.10% for the year ended December 31, 2013. As of June 30, 2014, the ALLL was 133.0% of nonperforming loans compared with 117.4% as of December 31, 2013. Based on the inherent risk in the loan portfolio, we believe that as of June 30, 2014, the ALLL was adequate; however, there is no assurance losses will not exceed the allowance and any growth in the loan portfolio and the uncertainty of the general economy may require that management continue to evaluate the adequacy of the ALLL and make additional provisions in future periods as deemed necessary.

There were no changes to our ALLL calculation methodology during the first six months of 2014. Classified and impaired loans are reviewed per the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 310.

We currently track the loan to value ("LTV") ratio of loans in our portfolio, and those loans in excess of internal and supervisory guidelines are presented to the Bank's board of directors on a quarterly basis. At June 30, 2014, there were 9 owner-occupied 1-4 family loans with a LTV ratio of 100% or greater. In addition, there were 30 home equity loans without credit enhancement that had a LTV ratio of 100% or greater. We have the first lien on 11 of these equity loans and other financial institutions have the first lien on the remaining 19.

We review all impaired and nonperforming loans individually on a quarterly basis to determine their level of impairment due to collateral deficiency or insufficient cash-flow based on a discounted cash-flow analysis. At June 30, 2014, reported TDRs

Table of Contents

were not a material portion of the loan portfolio. We review loans 90 days and over past due that are still accruing interest no less than quarterly to determine if there is a strong reason that the credit should not be placed on non-accrual.

Capital Resources

Total shareholders’ equity was $186.5 million as of June 30, 2014, compared to $178.0 million as of December 31, 2013, an increase of $8.5 million, or 4.8%. This increase was primarily attributable to net income of $9.7 million for the first half of 2014, and a $3.7 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive income due to market value adjustments on investment securities available for sale. These increases were partially offset by the payment of $2.4 million in common stock dividends, and a $2.2 million increase in treasury stock due to the repurchase of 84,100 shares of Company common stock at an average price of $24.20 per share.

Total shareholders' equity was 10.78% of total assets as of June 30, 2014 and was 10.14% as of December 31, 2013. Tangible equity to tangible assets was 10.34% as of June 30, 2014 and 9.69% as of December 31, 2013. Our Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio was 13.93% as of June 30, 2014 and was 13.36% as of December 31, 2013. Risk-based capital guidelines require the classification of assets and some off-balance-sheet items in terms of credit-risk exposure and the measuring of capital as a percentage of the risk-adjusted asset totals. We believe that, as of June 30, 2014, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which we were subject. As of that date, the Bank was “well capitalized” under regulatory prompt corrective action provisions.

In July 2013, the U.S. federal banking authorities approved the implementation of the Basel III regulatory capital reforms and issued rules effecting certain changes required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Basel III Rules”). The Basel III Rules are applicable to all U.S. banks that are subject to minimum capital requirements, as well as to bank and savings and loan holding companies other than “small bank holding companies” (generally bank holding companies with consolidated assets of less than $500 million). The Basel III Rules not only increase most of the required minimum regulatory capital ratios, but they also introduce a new Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio and the concept of a capital conservation buffer. The Basel III Rules also expand the definition of capital as in effect currently by establishing criteria that instruments must meet to be considered Additional Tier 1 Capital (Tier 1 Capital in addition to Common Equity) and Tier 2 Capital. A number of instruments that now generally qualify as Tier 1 Capital will not qualify, or their qualifications will change when the Basel III Rules are fully implemented. The Basel III Rules also permit banking organizations with less than $15.0 billion in assets to retain, through a one-time election, the existing treatment for accumulated other comprehensive income, which currently does not affect regulatory capital. The Basel III Rules have maintained the general structure of the current prompt corrective action framework, while incorporating the increased requirements. The prompt corrective action guidelines were also revised to add the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio. In order to be a “well-capitalized” depository institution under the new regime, a bank and holding company must maintain a Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio of 6.5% or more; a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 8% or more; a Total Capital ratio of 10% or more; and a leverage ratio of 5% or more. Generally, financial institutions become subject to the new Basel III Rules on January 1, 2015, with phase-in periods for many of the changes. Management is continuing to plan for the effects that Basel III Rules may have on the Company's and the Bank's capital positions.

We have traditionally disclosed certain non-GAAP ratios and amounts to evaluate and measure our financial condition, including our Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratios. We believe this ratio provides investors with information regarding our financial condition and how we evaluate our financial condition internally. The following table provides a reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to the most comparable GAAP equivalent.



	At June 30,			At December 31,
(in thousands)	2014			2013
Tier 1 capital
Total shareholders' equity	$	186,516		$	178,016
Plus: Long term debt (qualifying restricted core capital)	15,464			15,464
Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale	(4,699		)	(1,049		)
Less: Disallowed Intangibles	(8,763		)	(9,036		)
Tier 1 capital	$	188,518		$	183,395
Risk-weighted assets	$	1,353,406		$	1,372,648
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	13.93		%	13.36		%

Table of Contents

The following table provides the capital levels and minimum required capital levels for the Company and the Bank:



	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
(dollars in thousands)
At June 30, 2014
Consolidated:
Total capital/risk based	$	205,651	15.20	%	$	108,272	8.00	%	N/A		N/A
Tier 1 capital/risk based	188,518		13.93		54,136		4.00		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 capital/adjusted average	188,518		10.91		69,125		4.00		N/A		N/A
MidWestOne Bank:
Total capital/risk based	$	188,949	14.07	%	$	107,470	8.00	%	$	134,338	10.00	%
Tier 1 capital/risk based	172,133		12.81		53,735		4.00		80,603		6.00
Tier 1 capital/adjusted average	172,133		10.03		68,671		4.00		85,839		5.00
At December 31, 2013
Consolidated:
Total capital/risk based	$	200,714	14.62	%	$	109,812	8.00	%	N/A		N/A
Tier 1 capital/risk based	183,361		13.36		54,906		4.00		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 capital/adjusted average	183,361		10.55		69,491		4.00		N/A		N/A
MidWestOne Bank:
Total capital/risk based	$	183,646	13.49	%	$	108,903	8.00	%	$	136,128	10.00	%
Tier 1 capital/risk based	166,612		12.24		54,451		4.00		81,677		6.00
Tier 1 capital/adjusted average	166,612		9.65		69,063		4.00		86,329		5.00

On February 15, 2014, 20,600 restricted stock units were granted to certain officers of the Company, and on May 15, 2014, 5,500 restricted stock units were granted to the directors of the Company. Additionally, during the first six months of 2014, 26,641 shares of common stock were issued in connection with the vesting of previously awarded grants of restricted stock units, of which 1,993 shares were surrendered by grantees to satisfy tax requirements. In addition, 3,310 shares of common stock were issued in connection with the exercise of previously issued stock options, with no shares of stock surrendered in connection with the exercises.

Liquidity

Liquidity management involves meeting the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers. We conduct liquidity management on both a daily and long-term basis, and adjust our investments in liquid assets based on expected loan demand, projected loan maturities and payments, estimated cash flows from the loan pool participations, expected deposit flows, yields available on interest-bearing deposits, and the objectives of our asset/liability management program. We had liquid assets (cash and cash equivalents) of $22.3 million as of June 30, 2014, compared with $24.9 million as of December 31, 2013. Investment securities classified as available for sale, totaling $472.1 million and $498.6 million as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, could be sold to meet liquidity needs if necessary. Additionally, our bank subsidiary maintains unsecured lines of credit with several correspondent banks and secured lines with the Federal Reserve Bank discount window and the FHLB that would allow it to borrow funds on a short-term basis, if necessary. Management believes that the Company had sufficient liquidity as of June 30, 2014 to meet the needs of borrowers and depositors.

Our principal sources of funds were proceeds from the maturity and sale of investment securities, FHLB borrowings, and funds provided by operations. While scheduled loan amortization and maturing interest-bearing deposits are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by economic conditions, the general level of interest rates, and competition. We utilize particular sources of funds based on comparative costs and availability. This includes fixed-rate FHLB borrowings that can generally be obtained at a more favorable cost than deposits of comparable maturity. We generally manage the pricing of our deposits to maintain a steady deposit base but from time to time may decide, as we have done in the past, not to pay rates on deposits as high as our competition.

As of June 30, 2014, we had $15.5 million of long-term debt outstanding. This amount represents indebtedness payable under junior subordinated debentures issued to a subsidiary trust that issued trust preferred securities in a pooled offering. The junior subordinated debentures were issued with a 30-year term. The interest rate on the debt is a variable rate, based on the three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.59%, with interest payable quarterly. At June 30, 2014, the interest rate on the debt was 1.82%.

Table of Contents

Inflation

The effects of price changes and inflation can vary substantially for most financial institutions. While management believes that inflation affects the growth of total assets, it is difficult to assess its overall impact on the Company. Management believes this to be the case due to the fact that generally neither the timing nor the magnitude of the inflationary changes in the consumer price index (“CPI”) coincides with changes in interest rates. The price of one or more of the components of the CPI may fluctuate considerably and thereby influence the overall CPI without having a corresponding effect on interest rates or upon the cost of those goods and services normally purchased by us. In years of high inflation and high interest rates, intermediate and long-term interest rates tend to increase, thereby adversely impacting the market values of investment securities, mortgage loans and other long-term fixed rate loans held by financial institutions. In addition, higher short-term interest rates caused by inflation tend to increase financial institutions' cost of funds. In other years, the reverse situation may occur.

Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements

We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers, which include commitments to extend credit, commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held for sale, commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to customers at predetermined interest rates, as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contracts. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the commitments to extend credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. We use the same credit policies in making commitments as we do for on-balance-sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. As of June 30, 2014, outstanding commitments to extend credit totaled approximately $269.7 million. We have established a reserve of $0.2 million, which represents our estimate of probable losses as a result of these transactions. This reserve is not part of our allowance for loan losses. Commitments under standby and performance letters of credit outstanding aggregated $4.1 million as of June 30, 2014. We do not anticipate any losses as a result of these transactions.

Residential mortgage loans sold to others are predominantly conventional residential first lien mortgages originated under our usual underwriting procedures, and are most often sold on a nonrecourse basis. At June 30, 2014, there were approximately $6.2 million of mandatory commitments with investors to sell not yet originated residential mortgage loans. We do not anticipate any losses as a result of these transactions.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

In general, market risk is the risk of change in asset values due to movements in underlying market rates and prices. Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings and capital arising from movements in interest rates. Interest rate risk is the most significant market risk affecting the Company as other types of market risk, such as foreign currency exchange rate risk and commodity price risk, play a lesser role in the normal course of our business activities.

In addition to interest rate risk, the economic environment in recent years has made liquidity risk (namely, funding liquidity risk) a more prevalent concern among financial institutions. In general, liquidity risk is the risk of being unable to fund obligations to creditors (including, in the case of banks, obligations to depositors) as such obligations become due and/or fund the acquisition of assets.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity refers to our ability to fund operations, to meet depositor withdrawals, to provide for our customers' credit needs, and to meet maturing obligations and existing commitments. Our liquidity principally depends on cash flows from operating activities, investment in and maturity of assets, changes in balances of deposits and borrowings, and our ability to borrow funds.

Net cash inflows from operating activities were $15.0 million in the first six months of 2014, compared with $15.7 million in the first six months of 2013. Net income before depreciation, amortization, and accretion was the primary contributor for the first six months of 2014.

Net cash inflows from investing activities were $22.5 million in the first half of 2014, compared to net cash inflows of $12.4 million in the comparable six-month period of 2013. In the first six months of 2014, investment securities transactions resulted in net cash inflows of $22.4 million, compared to inflows of $33.5 million during the same period of 2013. Purchases of premises and equipment resulted in a $5.9 million cash outflow in the first six months of 2014, resulting from the two large building projects currently underway. The repayment of loan principal accounted for net cash inflows of $1.7 million for the first six months of

Table of Contents

2014, compared with $26.4 million of net outflows for the same period of 2013. Cash inflows from loan pool participations were $4.1 million during the first six months of 2014 compared to $5.9 million during the same period of 2013.

Net cash used in financing activities in the first six months of 2014 was $40.1 million, compared with net cash used of $51.7 million for the same period of 2013. The largest financing cash outflows during the six months ended June 30, 2014 were a $27.3 million net decrease in deposits, the $3.9 million net decrease in repurchase agreements and the net decrease of $3.0 million in FHLB borrowings.

To further mitigate liquidity risk, the Bank has several sources of liquidity in place to maximize funding availability and increase the diversification of funding sources. The criteria for evaluating the use of these sources include: volume concentration (percentage of liabilities), cost, volatility, and the fit with the current management plan. These acceptable sources of liquidity include:

•Federal Funds Lines

•FHLB Borrowings

•Brokered Deposits

•Brokered Repurchase Agreements

•Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window

Federal Funds Lines:

Routine liquidity requirements are met by fluctuations in the Bank's federal funds position. The principal function of these funds is to maintain short-term liquidity. Unsecured federal funds purchased lines are viewed as a volatile liability and are not used as a long-term funding solution, especially when used to fund long-term assets. Multiple correspondent relationships are preferable and federal funds sold exposure to any one customer is continuously monitored. The current federal funds purchased limit is 10% of total assets, or the amount of established federal funds lines, whichever is smaller. Currently, the Bank has unsecured federal funds lines totaling $55.0 million, which are tested annually to ensure availability.

FHLB Borrowings:

FHLB borrowings provide both a source of liquidity and long-term funding for the Bank. Use of this type of funding is coordinated with both the strategic balance sheet growth projections and the current and future interest rate risk profile of the Bank. Factors that are taken into account when contemplating use of FHLB borrowings are the effective interest rate, the collateral requirements, community investment program credits, and the implications and cost of having to purchase incremental FHLB stock. As of June 30, 2014, the Bank had $260.5 million of advance equivalent collateral pledged to the FHLB and $103.9 million in outstanding borrowings, leaving $150.5 million available for liquidity needs, based on collateral capacity. These borrowings are secured by various real estate loans (residential, commercial and agricultural).

Brokered Deposits:

The Bank has brokered certificate of deposit lines/deposit relationships available to help diversify its various funding sources. Brokered deposits offer several benefits relative to other funding sources, such as: maturity structures which cannot be duplicated in the current deposit market, deposit gathering which does not cannibalize the existing deposit base, the unsecured nature of these liabilities, and the ability to quickly generate funds. However, brokered deposits are often viewed as a volatile liability by banking regulators and market participants. This viewpoint, and the desire to not develop a large funding concentration in any one area, is reflected in an internal policy stating that the Bank limit the use of brokered deposits as a funding source to no more than 10% of total assets. Board approval is required to exceed this limit. The Bank will also have to maintain a “well capitalized” standing to access brokered deposits, as an “adequately capitalized" rating would require an FDIC waiver to do so, and an “undercapitalized” rating would prohibit the Bank from using brokered deposits altogether.

Brokered Repurchase Agreements:

Brokered repurchase agreements may be established with approved brokerage firms and banks. Repurchase agreements create rollover risk (the risk that a broker will discontinue the relationship due to market factors) and are not used as a long-term funding solution, especially when used to fund long-term assets. Collateral requirements and availability are evaluated and monitored. The current policy limit for brokered repurchase agreements is 10% of total assets. There were no outstanding brokered repurchase agreements at June 30, 2014.

Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window:

The Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window is another source of liquidity, particularly during difficult economic times. The Bank has a borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago limited by the amount of municipal securities

Table of Contents

pledged against the line. As of June 30, 2014, the Bank has municipal securities with an approximate market value of $13.1 million pledged for liquidity purposes.

Interest Rate Risk

The nature of the banking business, which involves paying interest on deposits at varying rates and terms and charging interest on loans at other rates and terms, creates interest rate risk. As a result, net interest margin and earnings and the market value of assets and liabilities are subject to fluctuations arising from the movement of interest rates. We manage several forms of interest rate risk, including asset/liability mismatch, basis risk and prepayment risk. A key management objective is to maintain a risk profile in which variations in net interest income stay within the limits and guidelines of the Bank's Asset/Liability Management Policy.

Like most financial institutions, our net income can be significantly influenced by a variety of external factors, including: overall economic conditions, policies and actions of regulatory authorities, the amounts of and rates at which assets and liabilities reprice, variances in prepayment of loans and securities other than those that are assumed, early withdrawal of deposits, exercise of call options on borrowings or securities, competition, a general rise or decline in interest rates, changes in the slope of the yield-curve, changes in historical relationships between indices (such as LIBOR and prime), and balance sheet growth or contraction. Our asset and liability committee seeks to manage interest rate risk under a variety of rate environments by structuring our balance sheet and off-balance-sheet positions in such a way that changes in interest rates do not have a large negative impact. The risk is monitored and managed within approved policy limits.

We use a third-party service to model and measure our exposure to potential interest rate changes. For various assumed hypothetical changes in market interest rates, numerous other assumptions are made, such as prepayment speeds on loans and securities backed by mortgages, the slope of the Treasury yield curve, the rates and volumes of our deposits, and the rates and volumes of our loans. This analysis measures the estimated change in net interest income in the event of hypothetical changes in interest rates. The following table presents our projected changes in net interest income for the various interest rate shock levels at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Analysis of Net Interest Income Sensitivity



	Immediate Change in Rates
	-200			-100			+100			+200
(dollars in thousands)
June 30, 2014
Dollar change	$	(442	)	$	35		$	(545	)	$	(965	)
Percent change	(0.8		)%	0.1		%	(1.0		)%	(1.8		)%
December 31, 2013
Dollar change	$	(1,060	)	$	(59	)	$	(616	)	$	(914	)
Percent change	(1.8		)%	(0.1		)%	(1.1		)%	(1.6		)%

As shown above, at June 30, 2014, the effect of an immediate and sustained 200 basis point increase in interest rates would decrease our net interest income by approximately $1.0 million. The effect of an immediate and sustained 200 basis point decrease in rates would decrease our net interest income by approximately $0.4 million. In a rising rate environment, our interest-bearing liabilities would reprice more quickly than interest-earning assets, thus reducing net interest income. A decrease in interest rates would also result in a decrease in net interest income as the yield on interest-earning assets would decline, but those on interest-bearing liabilities are generally unable to decline materially, as the average rate on our interest-bearing liabilities is already below 1.0%. In the current low interest rate environment, model results of a 200 basis point drop in interest rates are of questionable value as many interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets cannot re-price significantly lower than current levels. As part of a strategy to mitigate net interest margin compression in a low interest rate environment, management has incorporated interest rate floors on most newly originated floating rate loans. While incorporating interest rate floors on loans has been successful in maintaining our net interest margin in the current low rate environment, the coupon rates on these loans will lag when interest rates rise. These loans have floor rates that are between 0.0% and 2.0% above the fully indexed rate. Therefore, interest rates must rise up to 2.0% before some of these loans would experience an increase in the coupon rate.

Computations of the prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes were based on numerous assumptions. Actual values may differ from those projections set forth above. Further, the computations do not contemplate any actions we could have undertaken in response to changes in interest rates.

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under supervision and with the participation of certain members of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we completed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in SEC Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of June 30, 2014. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer believe that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report with respect to timely communication to them and other members of management responsible for preparing periodic reports of material information required to be disclosed in this report as it relates to the Company and our consolidated subsidiaries.

The effectiveness of our or any system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject to certain limitations, including the exercise of judgment in designing, implementing, and evaluating the controls and procedures, the assumptions used in identifying the likelihood of future events, and the inability to eliminate misconduct completely. As a result, there can be no assurance that our disclosure controls and procedures will prevent all errors or fraud or ensure that all material information will be made known to appropriate management in a timely fashion. By their nature, our or any system of disclosure controls and procedures can provide only reasonable assurance regarding management's control objectives.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of such term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We and our representatives may, from time to time, make written or oral statements that are “forward-looking” and provide information other than historical information. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from any results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statement. These factors include, among other things, the factors listed below.

Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of our management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “should”, “could”, “would”, “plans”, “intend”, “project”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “may” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Additionally, we undertake no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events, except as required under federal securities law.

Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors that could have an impact on our ability to achieve operating results, growth plan goals and future prospects include, but are not limited to, the following:


•	credit quality deterioration or pronounced and sustained reduction in real estate market values could cause an increase in our allowance for credit losses and a reduction in net earnings;


•	our management’s ability to reduce and effectively manage interest rate risk and the impact of interest rates in general on the volatility of our net interest income;


•	changes in the economic environment, competition, or other factors that may affect our ability to acquire loans or influence the anticipated growth rate of loans and deposits and the quality of the loan portfolio and loan and deposit pricing;


•	fluctuations in the value of our investment securities;


•	governmental monetary and fiscal policies;

•

legislative and regulatory changes, including changes in banking, securities and tax laws and regulations and their application by our regulators (particularly with respect to the Dodd-Frank Act and the extensive regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, as well as the rules adopted by the federal bank regulatory agencies to implement the Basel III capital accord), and changes in the scope and cost of FDIC insurance and other coverages;


•	the ability to attract and retain key executives and employees experienced in banking and financial services;

Table of Contents


•	the sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses to absorb the amount of actual losses inherent in our existing loan portfolio;


•	our ability to adapt successfully to technological changes to compete effectively in the marketplace;


•	credit risks and risks from concentrations (by geographic area and by industry) within our loan portfolio;


•	the effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds, and other financial institutions operating in our markets or elsewhere or providing similar services;


•	the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of allowances for loan losses and estimation of values of collateral and various financial assets and liabilities;


•	volatility of rate-sensitive deposits;


•	operational risks, including data processing system failures or fraud;


•	asset/liability matching risks and liquidity risks;


•	the risks of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, including, without limitation, the related time and costs of implementing such transactions, integrating operations as part of these transactions and possible failures to achieve expected gains, revenue growth and/or expense savings from such transactions;


•	the costs, effects and outcomes of existing or future litigation;


•	changes in general economic or industry conditions, nationally or in the communities in which we conduct business;


•	changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies and the Financial Accounting Standards Board; and


•	other factors and risks described under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013.

We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by the foregoing cautionary statements. Because of these risks and other uncertainties, our actual future results, performance or achievement, or industry results, may be materially different from the results indicated by these forward-looking statements. In addition, our past results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our future results.

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

The Company and its subsidiaries are from time to time parties to various legal actions arising in the normal course of business. We believe that there are no threatened or pending proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the Company's business, against the Company or its subsidiaries, which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2013. Please refer to that section of our Form 10-K for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to our business.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Programs
April 1 - 30, 2014	—	$	—	—	$	3,316,940
May 1 - 31, 2014	84,100	24.20		84,100	1,282,107
June 1 - 30, 2014	—	—		—	1,282,107
Total	84,100	$	24.20	84,100	$	1,282,107

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits.



Exhibit Number	Description	Incorporated by Reference to:

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)	Filed herewith

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)	Filed herewith

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	Filed herewith

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Filed herewith

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	Filed herewith

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



		MIDWESTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Dated:	July 31, 2014	By:	/s/ CHARLES N. FUNK
			Charles N. Funk
			President and Chief Executive Officer

		By:	/s/ GARY J. ORTALE
			Gary J. Ortale
			Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

MidWestOne Financial Group - 10-Q quarterly report FY2014 Q2

What is the market capitalization of a company?

DISCLAIMER

Contact

Links