Monro - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

585-647-6400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o     Accelerated filer þ     Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a Shell Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No

As of July 20, 2007, 14,389,958 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $ .01 per share, were outstanding.

 

 

MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     The consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007, the consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the thirteen week periods ended June 30, 2007 and June 24, 2006, and the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity for the thirteen week period ended June 30, 2007, include Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary (the “Company”). These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company and are subject to year-end adjustments. In the opinion of management, all known adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals or adjustments) have been made to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the unaudited periods presented.

     Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. The results of operations for the interim periods being reported on herein are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.

     The Company reports its results on a 52/53 week fiscal year with the fiscal year ending on the last Saturday in March of each year. The following are the dates represented by each fiscal period reported in these condensed financial statements:

     On April 29, 2006, the Company acquired 75 automotive maintenance and repair service stores located in eight metropolitan areas throughout Ohio and Pennsylvania from ProCare Automotive Service Solutions LLC (“ProCare”). The Company acquired the business and substantially all of the operating assets of these stores, which consist primarily of inventory and equipment, and assumed certain liabilities. The purchase price was $14.7 million in cash which was financed through the Company’s existing bank facility. The excess of the purchase price over the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed was allocated to goodwill. The Company converted 31 of the acquired ProCare stores to tire stores which are operating under the Mr. Tire brand name. The remaining stores are operating as service stores under the Monro brand name. The results of operations of the acquired ProCare stores are included in the Company’s results from April 29, 2006. In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded a reserve for accrued restructuring costs of approximately $.9 million. This reserve relates to costs associated with the closing of three duplicative or poorly performing ProCare stores, and includes charges for rent and real estate taxes (net of anticipated sublease income) since the April 2007 closure date, as well as the write down of assets to their fair market value. The closures brought the number of ProCare service stores down to 43 and the ProCare tire stores down to 29 stores.

     On November 1, 2005, the Company acquired a 13% interest in R&S Parts and Service, Inc. (“R&S”), a privately owned automotive aftermarket parts and service chain, for $2.0 million from GDJ Retail LLC. As part of the transaction, the Company also loaned R&S $5.0 million under a secured subordinated debt agreement that had a five-year term and carried an 8% interest rate. The loan was repaid in full in December 2006.

     On August 11, 2006, the Company announced that it would not exercise its option to purchase the remaining 87% of R&S, originally negotiated for an additional $12.0 million in cash and $1.0 million of Monro stock. In addition, the Company recorded an after-tax impairment charge of $1.7 million with respect to the original 13% equity investment, as well as due diligence costs related to R&S. Management reached this conclusion after learning that R&S had filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The impairment charge was reflected within “Other Expenses” on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the year ended March 31, 2007.

     Under the terms of the R&S debtor-in-possession financing, the Bankruptcy Court ordered the repayment to Monro of the $5 million secured loan, plus a portion of legal and other fees incurred by Monro in connection with the issuance and repayment of the loan. In February 2007, the Creditors’ Committee appointed in R&S’s bankruptcy commenced an action seeking repayment of the $5 million. In response, the Company filed a complaint against GDJ Retail, LLC and its principal, Glen Langberg, for breach of contract, contractual indemnification and negligent misrepresentation arising from the Company’s purchase of a 13% interest in R&S in November 2005.

MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     In May 2007, the Bankruptcy Court approved a global settlement of both actions. As a result of the settlement, the Company received $325,000 from R&S. The settlement has been reflected within “Other Income” on the Consolidated Statement of Income for the period ended June 30, 2007. All claims against the Company, GDJ Retail, LLC, Glen Langberg and R&S have been dismissed.

     The Company reports derivatives and hedging activities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (“SFAS 133”), “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended. This statement requires that all derivative instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded each period in current earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on whether the derivative is designated as part of a hedge transaction, and if it is, depending on the type of hedge transaction.

     Currently the Company has no hedge agreements. The most recent hedge agreement expired in October 2005.

     Basic earnings per common share (EPS) amounts are computed by dividing earnings after the deduction of preferred stock dividends by the average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS amounts assume the issuance of common stock for all potentially dilutive equivalents outstanding.

     The following is a reconciliation of basic and diluted EPS for the respective periods:

MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     The computation of diluted EPS excludes the effect of the assumed exercise of approximately 153,000 and 94,000 stock options, respectively, for the three months ended fiscal June 2007 and June 2006. Such amounts were excluded as the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market value of the Company’s common stock for those periods, resulting in an anti-dilutive effect on diluted EPS.

     The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) on April 1, 2007. The interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Specifically, the pronouncement prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on the related derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition of uncertain tax positions. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 of $1.6 million was recorded as a reduction to retained earnings. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of the date of adoption was $2.7 million, the majority of which, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. The Company historically classified unrecognized tax benefits in current taxes payable. As a result of adoption of FIN 48, unrecognized tax benefits were reclassified to long-term income taxes payable.

     The Company’s policy to include interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for taxes on the consolidated condensed statement of income did not change as a result of implementing the provisions of FIN 48. As of the date of adoption of FIN 48, the Company had accrued $.3 million for the payment of interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax benefits.

     The Company is currently under audit by certain state tax jurisdictions for the fiscal 2001 to 2003 tax years. It is reasonably possible that the examination phase of the audit for these years may conclude in the next 12 months, and that the related unrecognized tax benefits for tax positions taken regarding previously filed tax returns may change from those recorded as liabilities for uncertain tax positions in the Company’s financial statements as of April 1, 2007. However, based on the status of the examination, it is not possible to estimate the effect of any amount of such change to previously recorded uncertain tax positions.

     The Company files U.S. federal income tax returns and income tax returns in various state jurisdictions. The Company’s fiscal 2004 through fiscal 2006 U.S. federal tax years and various state tax years remain subject to income tax examinations by tax authorities.

     The following transactions represent non-cash investing and financing activities during the periods indicated:

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007:

     During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, the Company recorded purchase accounting adjustments for the ProCare Acquisition that increased goodwill by $1,142,000, reduced fixed assets by $1,585,000, increased debt by $128,000, reduced current liabilities by $31,000 and reduced long-term liabilities by $540,000.

     In connection with the accounting for income tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options, the Company reduced current liabilities and increased paid-in capital by $177,000.

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 24, 2006:

     In connection with the ProCare Acquisition (Note 2), liabilities were assumed as follows:

MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     In connection with the accounting for income tax benefits related to the exercise of stock options, the Company reduced current liabilities and increased paid-in capital by $849,000.

     In May 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors declared its intention to pay a regular quarterly cash dividend during fiscal 2007 of $.07 per common share or common share equivalent to be paid to shareholders beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2007. In May 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors declared its intention to pay a regular quarterly cash dividend during fiscal 2008 of $.09 per common share or common share equivalent to be paid beginning with the first quarter of 2008. The dividend amounted to $47,000 and $34,000, respectively for preferred shareholders and $981,000 and $683,000, respectively for common shareholders for the quarters ended June 30, 2007 and June 24, 2006, respectively.

     The declaration of, and any determination as to the payment of, future dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, compliance with charter and contractual restrictions, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

     In May 2007, the Company announced its intention to declare a three-for-two stock split of the Company’s common stock to be effected in the form of a 50% stock dividend. The stock split is subject to shareholder approval of an increase in the number of authorized common shares from 20,000,000 to 45,000,000. The shareholders vote to increase the number of shares of authorized common stock will take place on August 21, 2007 at Monro’s regularly scheduled Annual Shareholder’s meeting.

     In July 2007, the Company acquired the assets of Valley Forge Tire & Auto Centers and signed a definitive asset purchase agreement with Craven Tire & Auto. The combined purchase price of the two chains is approximately $16.7 million which will be funded primarily through the Company’s existing line of credit. The acquisition of the two chains will add a total of 19 stores to the Monro chain, all of which management intends to operate under the Mr. Tire brand name.

     In July 2007, the Company signed a five-year strategic partnership with Auction Direct USA, which currently operates used vehicle superstores in Rochester, NY and Morrow, GA. Under the terms of the agreement, Monro will provide consulting services to Auction Direct as it expands operations and opens additional locations and equipment to those stores. Monro expects to receive $250,000 annually in consulting revenue and the agreement is expected to generate approximately $1 million in revenue for the Rochester service center work each year. Further, Auction Direct has issued warrants to Monro for the purchase of 2.5 percent of its existing equity. Additionally, Robert G. Gross, President and Chief Executive Officer of Monro, has also been named to Auction Direct’s Board of Directors.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     The statements contained in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts, including (without limitation) statements made in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, may contain statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed. These factors include, but are not necessarily limited to, product demand, dependence on and competition within the primary markets in which the Company’s stores are located, the need for and costs associated with store renovations and other capital expenditures, the effect of economic conditions, the impact of competitive services and pricing, product development, parts supply restraints or difficulties, industry regulation, risks relating to leverage and debt service (including sensitivity to fluctuations in interest rates), continued availability of capital resources and financing, risks relating to integration of acquired businesses, the availability of vendor rebates and other factors set forth or incorporated elsewhere herein and in the Company’s other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time by or on behalf of the Company.

     The following table sets forth income statement data of Monro Muffler Brake, Inc. (“Monro” or the “Company”) expressed as a percentage of sales for the fiscal periods indicated:

     Sales were $107.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as compared with $98.4 million in the quarter ended June 24, 2006. The sales increase of $9.2 million, or 9.3%, was due to an increase of $5.4 million related to new stores (including $4.2 million from the Acquired ProCare stores), and a comparable store sales increase of 6.2%. There were 77 selling days in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and in the quarter ended June 24, 2006.

     At June 30, 2007, the Company had 696 company-operated stores compared with 701 stores at June 24, 2006. During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, the Company opened one tire store and closed three underperforming or redundant ProCare stores.

     The new ProCare stores acquired on April 29, 2006 were purchased out of bankruptcy. These stores suffered significant declines in recent years and did not perform at a profitable level in FY07. The ProCare stores lost approximately $.09 per share in fiscal 2007. However, sales have improved and continue to improve since the acquisition and efforts continue which focus on reducing costs and improving margins. As a result, these stores broke even in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, with an apporximate 10% comparable store sales increase. In spite of these improvements, however, the ProCare stores negatively impacted gross margin by .6%

and store direct costs (included in operating, selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses) by .5% in the current quarter.

     Gross profit for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 was $46.7 million or 43.4% of sales as compared with $41.0 million or 41.7% of sales for the quarter ended June 24, 2006. The increase in gross profit for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as a percentage of sales, is due to several factors. First, there were more vendor rebates received, as well as a shift in vendor rebates (in accordance with EITF 02-16) from SG&A to cost of sales in the current year quarter as compared to the prior year. Additionally, due to the recording of certain ProCare leases as capital leases (which occurred in the third quarter of fiscal 2007), there was a shift in expense from rent to interest expense. Further, distribution and occupancy costs decreased as a percent of sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 as compared to the prior year, as the Company, with improved sales, was able to better leverage these largely fixed costs.

     SG&A expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 increased by $3.0 million to $32.6 million from the quarter ended June 24, 2006, and were 30.3% of sales as compared to 30.1% in the prior year quarter. The increase in SG&A expense as a percentage of sales is due primarily to the aforementioned shift in vendor rebates from SG&A to cost of sales, partially offset by decreases in various store direct and store support costs.

     Operating income for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of approximately $14.0 million increased 22.9% as compared to operating income for the quarter ended June 24, 2006, and increased as a percentage of sales from 11.6% to 13.0% for the same periods.

     Net interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 increased by approximately $.6 million as compared to the same period in the prior year, and increased from .6% to 1.1% as a percentage of sales for the same periods. The weighted average debt outstanding for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 increased by approximately $10.1 million from the quarter ended June 24, 2006, primarily related to $20.4 million of capital leases assumed in connection with the ProCare acquisition, involving 45 locations, partially offset by net payments on the Company’s revolving credit facility. Additionally, there was an increase in the weighted average interest rate on the Company’s credit facility for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of approximately 110 basis points from the quarter ended June 24, 2006, resulting in an increase in expense between the two periods. The increase was also largely due to the interest rates associated with the capital leases which are generally much higher than the Company’s incremental borrowing rate under its revolving credit facility, which is currently at Libor plus 75 basis points. There was also a decrease in interest income of $.2 million.

     Other income decreased $.4 million as compared to the prior year, primarily related to the relocation of a Mr. Tire store in the quarter ended June 24, 2006. The owners of the property paid the Company $.9 million to relinquish the lease. The Company did not have a similar transaction in the current year quarter. However, the Company recorded $325,000 of income in the current year quarter in connection with the Company’s settlement of all outstanding legal claims with Strauss. Additionally, amortization expense was $.1 million in the current quarter as compared to $.3 million in the prior year quarter.

     The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and June 24, 2006 was 37.5% and 33.8%, respectively, of pre-tax income. In the quarter ended June 24, 2006, the tax provision of 37.5% of pre-tax income was offset by the recognition of a $.4 million income tax benefit primarily related to the favorable resolution of state income tax issues.

     Net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of $8.2 million increased 8.2% from net income for the quarter ended June 24, 2006. Earnings per share on a diluted basis for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 increased 8.0%.

     Interim Period Reporting

     The data included in this report are unaudited and are subject to year-end adjustments; however, in the opinion of management, all known adjustments (which consist only of normal recurring adjustments) have been made to present fairly the Company’s operating results and financial position for the unaudited periods. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the fiscal year.

     Capital Resources

     The Company’s primary capital requirements in fiscal 2008 are the upgrading of facilities and systems in existing stores and the funding of its store expansion program, including potential acquisitions of existing store chains. For the three months ended June 30, 2007, the Company spent $3.5 million principally for equipment and leasehold improvements. Funds were provided primarily by cash flow from operations. Management believes that the Company has sufficient resources available (including cash and equivalents, net cash flow from operations and bank financing) to expand its business as currently planned for the next several years.

     Liquidity

     In March 2003, the Company renewed its credit facility agreement. The amended financing arrangement consisted of an $83.4 million Revolving Credit facility, and a non-amortizing credit loan totaling $26.6 million.

     In July 2005, the Company amended its existing credit facility terms by entering into a five-year, $125 million Revolving Credit Facility agreement (the “Credit Facility”) (of which approximately $14.0 million was outstanding at June 30, 2007) with five banks in the lending syndicate that provided the Company’s prior financing arrangement. Interest only is payable monthly throughout the Credit Facility’s term. The Credit Facility increases the Company’s current borrowing capacity by $15 million to $125 million and includes a provision allowing the Company to expand the amount of the overall facility to $160 million, subject to existing or new lender(s) commitments at that time. The terms of the Credit Facility immediately reduced the spread the Company pays on LIBOR-based borrowings by 50 basis points and permit the payment of cash dividends not to exceed 25% of the preceding year’s net income. Additionally, the amended Credit Facility is not secured by the Company’s real property, although the Company has entered into an agreement not to encumber its real property, with certain permissible exceptions. Other terms of the Credit Facility are generally consistent with the Company’s prior financing agreement.

     In January 2007, the Company amended the Credit Facility to: 1) allow stock buybacks subject to the Company being able to meet its existing financial covenants; 2) extend the termination date by 18 months to January 2012; and 3) increase the accordion feature by $40 million, which allows the Company to expand the amount of the overall facility to $200 million.

     The Company has financed the land associated with its office/warehouse facility via a mortgage note payable of $.7 million due in a balloon payment in 2015. In addition, the Company has financed certain store properties and equipment with capital leases, which amount to $32.5 million and are due in installments through 2026.

     Certain of the Company’s long-term debt agreements require, among other things, the maintenance of specified interest and rent coverage ratios and amounts of net worth. They also contain restrictions on cash dividend payments. At June 30, 2007, the Company is in compliance with the applicable debt covenants. These agreements permit mortgages and specific lease financing arrangements with other parties with certain limitations.

     The Company enters into interest rate hedge agreements, which involve the exchange of fixed and floating rate interest payments periodically over the life of the agreement without the exchange of the underlying principal amounts. The differential to be paid or received is accrued as interest rates change and is recognized over the life of the agreements as an offsetting adjustment to interest expense. Currently, the Company has no hedge agreements. The most recent hedge agreement expired in October 2005.

     In February 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 155 (“SFAS 155”), “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments” (an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 140). This Statement permits fair value measurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation. The fair value may also be applied for hybrid financial instruments that had been bifurcated under previous accounting guidance prior to the adoption of this Statement. The adoption of this pronouncement in the first quarter of 2008 had no impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

     In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”). The interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. Specifically, the pronouncement prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on the related derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim periods, disclosure and transition of uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 was adopted in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Further information regarding the adoption of FIN 48 is disclosed in Note 5, “Income Taxes”.

     In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), “Fair Value Measurements.” This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value

measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 157 to have a material impact on the financial results or existing debt covenants of the Company.

     In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 159 (“SFAS 159”), “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115”. FAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Entities that elect the fair value option will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis, with few exceptions. FAS 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements to facilitate comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes for similar assets and liabilities. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 159 to have a material impact on the financial results or existing debt covenants of the Company.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     For a description of the Company’s market risks see “Item 7A – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007. The Company’s exposure to market risks has not changed materially from the description in the Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

     Disclosure controls and procedures

     The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that the Company files or submits pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

     In conjunction with the close of each fiscal quarter and under the supervision of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducts an update, a review and an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. It is the conclusion of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, based upon an evaluation completed as of the end of the most recent fiscal quarter reported on herein, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

     There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2007 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE, INC.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     There have been no changes to the risk factors described in the Company’s previously filed Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.

Item 6. Exhibits

     a. Exhibits

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.