Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-35172
NGL Energy Partners LP
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
27-3427920
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
6120 South Yale Avenue Suite 805 Tulsa, Oklahoma
74136
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip code)
(918) 4811119
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer x
Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
At November 2, 2015, there were 106,936,303 common units issued and outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1.
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
5
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the six months ended September 30, 2015
6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
8
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
53
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
100
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
101
PART II
Legal Proceedings
102
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5.
Other Information
Item 6.
Exhibits
103
Signatures
104
Index to Exhibits
105
i
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10Q (Quarterly Report) contains various forward-looking statements and information that are based on our beliefs and those of our general partner, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to us. These forward-looking statements are identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Certain words in this Quarterly Report such as anticipate, believe, could, estimate, expect, forecast, goal, intend, may, plan, project, will, and similar expressions and statements regarding our plans and objectives for future operations, identify forward-looking statements. Although we and our general partner believe such forward-looking statements are reasonable, neither we nor our general partner can assure they will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and assumptions. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those expected. Among the key risk factors that may impact our consolidated financial position and results of operations are:
· the prices of crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined products, ethanol, and biodiesel;
· energy prices generally;
· the general level of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids production;
· the general level of demand for crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined products, ethanol, and biodiesel;
· the availability of supply of crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined products, ethanol, and biodiesel;
· the level of crude oil and natural gas drilling and production in producing areas in which we have water treatment and disposal facilities;
· the prices of propane and distillates relative to the prices of alternative and competing fuels;
· the price of gasoline relative to the price of corn, which impacts the price of ethanol;
· the ability to obtain adequate supplies of products in the event of an interruption in supply or transportation and the availability of capacity to transport products to market areas;
· actions taken by foreign oil and gas producing nations;
· the political and economic stability of foreign oil and gas producing nations;
· the effect of weather conditions on supply and demand for crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined products, ethanol, and biodiesel;
· the effect of natural disasters, lightning strikes, or other significant weather events;
· the availability of local, intrastate and interstate transportation infrastructure, including with respect to our truck, railcar, and barge transportation services;
· the availability, price, and marketing of competing fuels;
· the impact of energy conservation efforts on product demand;
· energy efficiencies and technological trends;
· governmental regulation and taxation;
· the impact of legislative and regulatory actions on hydraulic fracturing and on the treatment of flowback and produced water;
· hazards or operating risks incidental to the transporting and distributing of petroleum products that may not be fully covered by insurance;
1
· the maturity of the crude oil, natural gas liquids, and refined products industries and competition from other marketers;
· loss of key personnel;
· the ability to hire drivers;
· the ability to renew contracts with key customers;
· the ability to maintain or increase the margins we realize for our terminal, barging, trucking, water disposal, recycling, and discharge services;
· the ability to renew leases for our leased equipment and storage facilities;
· the nonpayment or nonperformance by our counterparties;
· the availability and cost of capital and our ability to access certain capital sources;
· a deterioration of the credit and capital markets;
· the ability to successfully identify and consummate strategic acquisitions, and integrate acquired assets and businesses;
· changes in the volume of hydrocarbons recovered during the wastewater treatment process;
· changes in the financial condition and results of operations of entities in which we own noncontrolling equity interests;
· changes in applicable laws and regulations, including tax, environmental, transportation and employment regulations, or new interpretations by regulatory agencies concerning such laws and regulations and the impact of such laws and regulations (now existing or in the future) on our business operations;
· the costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings;
· any reduction or the elimination of the federal Renewable Fuel Standard; and
· changes in the jurisdictional characteristics of, or the applicable regulatory policies with respect to, our pipeline assets.
You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. Except as required by state and federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. When considering forward-looking statements, please review the risks described under Part I, Item 1ARisk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.
2
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
NGL ENERGY PARTNERS LP AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(U.S. Dollars in Thousands, except unit amounts)
September 30,
March 31,
2015
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
30,053
41,303
Accounts receivabletrade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,995 and $4,367, respectively
712,025
1,024,226
Accounts receivableaffiliates
6,345
17,198
Inventories
408,374
441,762
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
120,122
120,855
Total current assets
1,276,919
1,645,344
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation of $270,332 and $202,959, respectively
1,845,112
1,617,389
GOODWILL
1,490,928
1,402,761
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net of accumulated amortization of $274,823 and $220,517, respectively
1,231,192
1,288,343
INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
473,239
472,673
LOAN RECEIVABLEAFFILIATE
23,775
8,154
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
108,672
112,837
Total assets
6,449,837
6,547,501
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payabletrade
568,523
833,380
Accounts payableaffiliates
18,794
25,794
Accrued expenses and other payables
164,433
195,116
Advance payments received from customers
96,380
54,234
Current maturities of long-term debt
4,040
4,472
Total current liabilities
852,170
1,112,996
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current maturities
3,093,694
2,745,299
OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
17,679
16,086
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 10)
EQUITY:
General partner, representing a 0.1% interest, 105,269 and 103,899 notional units, respectively
(34,380
)
(37,021
Limited partners, representing a 99.9% interest, 105,164,071 and 103,794,870 common units issued and outstanding, respectively
1,976,663
2,162,924
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(136
(109
Noncontrolling interests
544,147
547,326
Total equity
2,486,294
2,673,120
Total liabilities and equity
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(U.S. Dollars in Thousands, except unit and per unit amounts)
Three Months Ended September 30,
Six Months Ended September 30,
2014
REVENUES:
Crude oil logistics
1,007,578
2,111,143
2,335,362
4,040,426
Water solutions
47,494
52,719
101,787
100,033
Liquids
258,992
539,753
507,977
1,014,910
Retail propane
53,206
68,358
117,653
146,260
Refined products and renewables
1,825,925
2,607,220
3,668,885
3,724,717
Other
1,333
2,794
Total Revenues
3,193,195
5,380,526
6,731,664
9,029,140
COST OF SALES:
982,719
2,083,712
2,274,711
3,981,351
(8,567
(9,439
(4,960
1,134
221,115
514,064
453,391
976,080
20,879
39,894
50,443
87,418
1,789,680
2,550,851
3,554,792
3,665,164
383
2,371
Total Cost of Sales
3,005,826
5,179,465
6,328,377
8,713,518
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Operating
99,773
97,419
207,687
164,855
General and administrative
29,298
41,639
91,779
69,512
Depreciation and amortization
56,761
50,099
116,592
89,474
Loss on disposal or impairment of assets, net
1,291
4,134
1,712
4,566
Operating Income (Loss)
246
7,770
(14,483
(12,785
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities
2,432
3,697
11,150
6,262
Interest expense
(31,571
(28,651
(62,373
(49,145
Other income (expense), net
1,955
(617
780
(1,008
Loss Before Income Taxes
(26,938
(17,801
(64,926
(56,676
INCOME TAX BENEFIT
2,786
1,922
2,248
887
Net Loss
(24,152
(15,879
(62,678
(55,789
LESS: NET INCOME ALLOCATED TO GENERAL PARTNER
(16,166
(11,056
(31,525
(20,437
LESS: NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
(2,891
(3,345
(6,766
(3,410
NET LOSS ALLOCATED TO LIMITED PARTNERS
(43,209
(30,280
(100,969
(79,636
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON UNIT
(0.41
(0.34
(0.97
(0.93
BASIC AND DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON UNITS OUTSTANDING
105,189,463
88,331,653
104,542,427
81,267,742
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(U.S. Dollars in Thousands)
Net loss
Other comprehensive income (loss)
(19
(22
(27
163
Comprehensive loss
(24,171
(15,901
(62,705
(55,626
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Six Months Ended September 30, 2015
Accumulated
Limited Partners
General
Common
Comprehensive
Noncontrolling
Total
Partner
Units
Amount
Loss
Interests
Equity
BALANCES AT MARCH 31, 2015
103,794,870
Distributions
(28,929
(125,895
(17,780
(172,604
Contributions
45
6,613
6,658
Business combinations
386,383
11,367
Equity issued pursuant to incentive compensation plan
1,140,444
32,919
Common unit repurchases
(157,626
(3,650
Net income (loss)
31,525
6,766
Other comprehensive loss
TLP equity-based compensation
1,301
(33
(79
(112
BALANCES AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
105,164,071
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization, including amortization of debt issuance costs
124,551
97,624
Non-cash equity-based compensation expense
51,482
11,758
Provision for doubtful accounts
3,046
1,347
Net commodity derivative gain
(44,534
(38,496
(11,150
(6,262
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated entities
11,593
5,180
(8
(837
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, exclusive of acquisitions:
Accounts receivabletrade
311,377
(358,497
10,853
(33,733
34,333
(203,965
Prepaid expenses and other assets
(7,322
(56,109
(265,322
463,767
(7,000
8,392
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
(17,083
25,719
40,245
73,700
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
174,095
(61,635
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of long-lived assets
(222,276
(82,851
Acquisitions of businesses, including acquired working capital, net of cash acquired
(150,546
(658,764
Cash flows from commodity derivatives
43,032
4,327
Proceeds from sales of assets
3,567
8,741
Investments in unconsolidated entities
(6,926
(26,390
Distributions of capital from unconsolidated entities
8,207
4,649
Loan for natural gas liquids facility
(3,913
Payments on loan for natural gas liquids facility
3,546
Loan to affiliate
(15,621
Net cash used in investing activities
(340,930
(750,288
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from borrowings under revolving credit facilities
1,354,700
1,979,500
Payments on revolving credit facilities
(1,006,600
(1,804,000
Issuance of notes
400,000
Payments on other long-term debt
(2,344
(4,175
Debt issuance costs
(1,380
(9,198
Contributions from general partner
395
Contributions from noncontrolling interest owners
Distributions to partners
(154,824
(111,008
Distributions to noncontrolling interest owners
(8,654
Taxes paid on behalf of equity incentive plan participants
(19,083
Proceeds from sale of common units, net of offering costs
370,446
Net cash provided by financing activities
155,585
813,306
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(11,250
1,383
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
10,440
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
11,823
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
At September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, and for the
Three Months and Six Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
Note 1Organization and Operations
NGL Energy Partners LP (we, us, our, or the Partnership) is a Delaware limited partnership. NGL Energy Holdings LLC serves as our general partner. At September 30, 2015, our operations include:
· Our crude oil logistics segment, the assets of which include owned and leased crude oil storage terminals, owned and leased pipeline injection stations, a fleet of owned trucks and trailers, a fleet of owned and leased railcars, a fleet of owned and leased barges and towboats, and a 50% interest in a crude oil pipeline. Our crude oil logistics segment purchases crude oil from producers and transports it for resale at owned and leased pipeline injection stations, storage terminals, barge loading facilities, rail facilities, refineries, and other trade hubs.
· Our water solutions segment, the assets of which include water pipelines, water treatment and disposal facilities, washout facilities, and solid waste disposal facilities. Our water solutions segment generates revenues from the treatment and disposal of wastewater generated from crude oil and natural gas production, from the sale of recycled water and recovered hydrocarbons, and from the disposal of solids such as tank bottoms and drilling fluids, as well as truck and frac tank washouts.
· Our liquids segment, which supplies natural gas liquids to retailers, wholesalers, refiners, and petrochemical plants throughout the United States and in Canada, and which provides natural gas liquids terminaling and storage services through its 19 owned terminals throughout the United States, its salt dome storage facility in Utah, and its leased storage and railcar transportation services through its fleet of leased railcars.
· Our retail propane segment, which sells propane, distillates, and equipment and supplies to end users consisting of residential, agricultural, commercial, and industrial customers and to certain resellers in 25 states and the District of Columbia.
· Our refined products and renewables segment conducts gasoline, diesel, ethanol, and biodiesel marketing operations. We also own the 2.0% general partner interest and a 19.6% limited partner interest in TransMontaigne Partners L.P. (TLP), which conducts refined products terminaling, storage, and transportation operations.
Note 2Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include our accounts and those of our controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments we cannot exercise control of, but can exercise significant influence over, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.
Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for interim consolidated financial information in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements exclude certain information and notes required by GAAP for complete annual consolidated financial statements. However, we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of our consolidated financial position and results of operations for the interim periods presented. Such adjustments consist only of normal recurring items, unless otherwise disclosed in this Quarterly Report. The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2015 is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 included in our Annual Report on Form 10K (Annual Report).
We have reclassified certain prior period financial statement information to be consistent with the classification methods used in the current fiscal year. These reclassifications did not impact previously reported amounts of equity, net income, or cash flows.
These interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report. Due to the seasonal nature of certain of our operations and other factors, the results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for future periods or for the full fiscal year ending March 31, 2016.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsContinued
Use of Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amount of assets and liabilities reported at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the amount of revenues and expenses reported during the periods presented.
Critical estimates we make in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements include determining the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations, the collectability of accounts receivable, the recoverability of inventories, useful lives and recoverability of property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangible assets, the impairment of goodwill, the fair value of asset retirement obligations, the value of equity-based compensation, and accruals for various commitments and contingencies, among others. Although we believe these estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are consistent with those disclosed in Note 2 of our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report.
Fair Value Measurements
We record our commodity derivative instruments and assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is based upon assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability. We use the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes valuation technique inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels:
· Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date.
· Level 2Inputs (other than quoted prices included within Level 1) that are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability, including (i) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, (ii) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, (iii) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and (iv) inputs that are derived from observable market data by correlation or other means. Instruments categorized in Level 2 include non-exchange traded derivatives such as over-the-counter commodity price swap and option contracts. We determine the fair value of all of our derivative financial instruments utilizing pricing models for similar instruments. Inputs to the pricing models include publicly available prices and forward curves generated from a compilation of data gathered from third parties.
· Level 3Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability including situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable data (Level 3). In some cases, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The lowest level input that is significant to a fair value measurement determines the applicable level in the fair value hierarchy. Assessing the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment, considering factors specific to the asset or liability.
Revenue Recognition
We record product sales revenues when title to the product transfers to the purchaser, which typically occurs when the purchaser receives the product. We record terminaling, transportation, storage, and service revenues when the service is performed, and we record tank and other rental revenues over the lease term. Several of our terminaling service agreements with throughput customers allow us to receive the product volume gained resulting from differences between the measurement of product volumes received and distributed at our terminaling facilities. Such differences are due to the inherent variances in measurement devices and methodology. We record revenues for the net proceeds from the sale of the product gained. Revenues for our water solutions segment are recognized when we obtain the wastewater at our treatment and disposal facilities.
9
We report taxes collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities, such as sales and use taxes, on a net basis. We include amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling costs in revenues in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
We enter into certain contracts whereby we agree to purchase product from a counterparty and sell the same volume of product to the same counterparty at a different location or time. When such agreements are entered into at the same time and are entered into in contemplation of each other, we record the revenues for these transactions net of cost of sales.
Revenues during the three months and six months ended September 30, 2015 include $1.5 million and $2.9 million, respectively, associated with the amortization of a liability recorded in the acquisition accounting for an acquired business related to certain out-of-market revenue contracts.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Supplemental cash flow information is as follows for the periods indicated:
(in thousands)
Interest paid, exclusive of debt issuance costs and letter of credit fees
26,323
10,445
57,495
36,429
Income taxes paid
533
1,241
4,616
2,246
Cash flows from settlements of commodity derivative instruments are classified as cash flows from investing activities in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, and adjustments to the fair value of commodity derivative instruments are included in operating activities.
We value our inventories at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using either the weighted-average cost or the first in, first out (FIFO) methods, including the cost of transportation and storage. Market is determined based on estimated replacement cost using prices at the end of the reporting period. In performing this analysis, we consider fixed-price forward commitments and the opportunity to transfer propane inventory from our wholesale liquids business to our retail propane business to sell the inventory in retail markets.
Inventories consist of the following at the dates indicated:
Crude oil
84,672
145,412
Natural gas liquids
Propane
65,124
44,535
Butane
22,715
8,668
7,028
3,874
Refined products
Gasoline
99,208
128,092
Diesel
97,016
59,097
Renewables
22,484
44,668
10,127
7,416
10
Investments in Unconsolidated Entities
We own noncontrolling interests in certain entities. The largest of these investments are in Glass Mountain Pipeline, LLC (Glass Mountain), which owns a crude oil pipeline in Oklahoma, and Battleground Oil Specialty Terminal Company LLC (BOSTCO), which owns a refined products storage facility.
We account for these investments using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method, we do not report the individual assets and liabilities of these entities on our condensed consolidated balance sheets; instead, our ownership interests are reported within investments in unconsolidated entities on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Under the equity method, the investment is recorded at acquisition cost, increased by our proportionate share of any earnings and additional capital contributions and decreased by our proportionate share of any losses, distributions paid, and amortization of any excess investment. Excess investment is the amount by which our total investment exceeds our proportionate share of the historical net book value of the net assets of the investee.
Our investments in unconsolidated entities consist of the following at the dates indicated:
Ownership
Date Acquired
Entity
Segment
Interest
or Formed
Glass Mountain (1)
50.0
%
December 2013
183,888
187,590
BOSTCO (2)
42.5
July 2014
238,687
238,146
Frontera (2)
17,069
16,927
Water supply company
35.0
June 2014
16,483
16,471
Water treatment and disposal facility
August 2015
2,290
Ethanol production facility
19.0
14,231
13,539
Retail propane company
April 2015
591
(1) When we acquired Gavilon, LLC, we recorded the investment in Glass Mountain at fair value. Our investment in Glass Mountain exceeds our proportionate share of the historical net book value of Glass Mountains net assets by $75.7 million at September 30, 2015. This difference relates primarily to goodwill and customer relationships.
(2) When we acquired TransMontaigne Inc. (TransMontaigne), we recorded the investments in BOSTCO and Frontera Brownsville LLC (Frontera) at fair value. On a combined basis, our investments in BOSTCO and Frontera exceed our proportionate share of the historical net book value of BOSTCOs and Fronteras net assets by $15.4 million at September 30, 2015. This difference relates primarily to goodwill.
Other Noncurrent Assets
Other noncurrent assets consist of the following at the dates indicated:
Loan receivable (1)
54,413
58,050
Linefill (2)
35,060
19,199
19,727
(1) Represents a loan receivable associated with our financing of the construction of a natural gas liquids facility being used by a third party.
(2) Represents minimum volumes of crude oil we are required to leave on certain third-party owned pipelines under long-term shipment commitments. At September 30, 2015, linefill consisted of 487,104 barrels of crude oil.
11
Accrued Expenses and Other Payables
Accrued expenses and other payables consist of the following at the dates indicated:
Accrued compensation and benefits
40,339
52,078
Excise and other tax liabilities
39,941
43,847
Derivative liabilities
13,729
27,950
Accrued interest
22,369
23,065
Product exchange liabilities
25,441
15,480
22,614
32,696
Noncontrolling Interests
We have certain consolidated subsidiaries in which outside parties own interests. The noncontrolling interest shown in our condensed consolidated financial statements reflects the other owners interests in these entities.
As part of our acquisition of TransMontaigne on July 1, 2014, we acquired a 19.7% limited partner interest in TLP. We attribute net earnings allocable to TLPs limited partners to the controlling and noncontrolling interests based on the relative ownership interests in TLP as well as including certain adjustments related to our acquisition accounting. Earnings allocable to TLPs limited partners are net of the earnings allocable to TLPs general partner interest. The earnings allocable to TLPs general partner interest include the distributions of cash attributable to the period to TLPs general partner interest and incentive distribution rights, net of adjustments for TLPs general partners proportionate share of undistributed earnings. Undistributed earnings are allocated to TLPs limited partners and TLPs general partner interest based on their respective sharing of earnings or losses specified in TLPs partnership agreement, which is based on their ownership percentages of 98% and 2%, respectively.
Business Combination Measurement Period
We record the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination at their acquisition date fair values. Pursuant to GAAP, an entity is allowed no more than one year to obtain the information necessary to identify and measure the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. As described in Note 4, certain acquisitions are still within this measurement period, and as a result, the acquisition date fair values we have recorded for the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are subject to change.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 201511, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU No. 201511 requires that inventory within the scope of the guidance be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The ASU is effective for the Partnership beginning April 1, 2017, although early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our current accounting policies.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 201503, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. ASU No. 201503 requires that debt issuance costs (excluding costs associated with revolving debt arrangements) be presented in the balance sheet as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt. We plan to adopt this ASU effective March 31, 2016, when we will begin presenting
12
debt issuance costs as a reduction to long-term debt, rather than as an intangible asset. At September 30, 2015, intangible assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet include $16.1 million of debt issuance costs associated with our senior notes that, upon adoption of ASU No. 201503, would be reclassified as a reduction to long-term debt. The ASU requires retrospective application for all prior periods presented. At March 31, 2015, intangible assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet include $17.8 million of debt issuance costs associated with our senior notes that, upon adoption of ASU No. 201503, will be reclassified as a reduction to long-term debt.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 201409, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU No. 201409 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The core principle of this ASU is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. The ASU is effective for the Partnership beginning April 1, 2018, and allows for both full retrospective and modified retrospective (with cumulative effect) methods of adoption. We are in the process of determining the method of adoption and assessing the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 3Loss Per Common Unit
Our loss per common unit is as follows for the periods indicated:
(in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts)
Net loss attributable to parent equity
(27,043
(19,224
(69,444
(59,199
Less: Net income allocated to general partner (1)
Less: Net loss allocated to subordinated unitholders (2)
4,013
Net loss allocated to common unitholders
(75,623
Basic and diluted weighted average common units outstanding
Basic and diluted loss per common unit
(1) Net income allocated to the general partner includes distributions to which it is entitled as the holder of incentive distribution rights, which are described in Note 11.
(2) All outstanding subordinated units converted to common units in August 2014. Since the subordinated units did not share in the distribution of cash generated after June 30, 2014, we did not allocate any income or loss after that date to the subordinated unitholders. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, 5,919,346 subordinated units were outstanding and the loss per subordinated unit was $(0.68).
The restricted units described in Note 11 were antidilutive during the three months and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, but could have an impact on earnings per unit in future periods.
13
Note 4Acquisitions
Year Ending March 31, 2016
Delaware Basin Water Solutions Facilities
On August 24, 2015, we acquired four saltwater disposal facilities and a 50% interest in an additional saltwater disposal facility in the Delaware Basin of the Permian Basin in Texas for $50.0 million of cash. We are in the process of identifying and determining the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in this business combination, and as a result, the estimates of fair value at September 30, 2015 are subject to change. We expect to complete this process before we issue our financial statements for the three months ending June 30, 2016. The following table summarizes the preliminary estimates of the fair values of the assets acquired (and useful lives) and liabilities assumed (in thousands):
Property, plant and equipment:
Water treatment facilities and equipment (330 years)
18,650
Land
400
Goodwill
12,776
Intangible asset:
Customer relationships (6 years)
16,000
(116
Fair value of net assets acquired
50,000
Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration paid for the acquired business over the fair value of the individual assets acquired, net of liabilities assumed. Goodwill primarily represents the value of synergies between the acquired business and the Partnership and the opportunity to use the acquired business as a platform for growth. We estimate that all of the goodwill will be deductible for federal income tax purposes.
Water Solutions Facilities
As described below, we are party to certain development agreements that provide us a right to purchase water solutions facilities developed by the other party to the agreements. During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we purchased eight water treatment and disposal facilities under these development agreements. On a combined basis, we paid $82.6 million of cash and issued 386,383 common units, valued at $11.4 million, in exchange for these facilities.
We are in the process of identifying and determining the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in these business combinations, and as a result, the estimates of fair value at September 30, 2015 are subject to change. We expect to complete this process before we issue our financial statements for the three months ending June 30, 2016. The following table summarizes the preliminary estimates of the fair values of the assets acquired (and useful lives) and liabilities assumed (in thousands):
32,449
Buildings and leasehold improvements (730 years)
7,281
1,028
Other (5 years)
30
55,529
(2,102
Other noncurrent liabilities
(233
93,982
14
Retail Propane Businesses
During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we acquired four retail propane businesses and paid $15.9 million of cash on a combined basis in exchange for these assets and operations. The agreements for these acquisitions contemplate post-closing payments for certain working capital items. We are in the process of identifying and determining the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in these business combinations, and as a result, the estimates of fair value at September 30, 2015 are subject to change. We expect to complete this process before we issue our financial statements for the three months ending June 30, 2016.
Year Ended March 31, 2015
As described in Note 2, pursuant to GAAP, an entity is allowed no more than one year to obtain the information necessary to identify and measure the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. The changes we made during the six months ended September 30, 2015 to the estimated acquisition date fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in these business combinations are described below. We have not retrospectively adjusted previously issued financial statements for these changes, as we do not believe the changes are material.
15
Natural Gas Liquids Storage Facility
In February 2015, we acquired Sawtooth NGL Caverns, LLC (Sawtooth), which owns a natural gas liquids salt dome storage facility in Utah with rail and truck access to western United States markets and entered into a construction agreement to expand the storage capacity of the facility. We paid $97.6 million of cash, net of cash acquired, and issued 7,396,973 common units, valued at $218.5 million, in exchange for these assets and operations. The agreement for this acquisition contemplates post-closing payments for certain working capital items. We are in the process of identifying and determining the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in this business combination, and as a result, the estimates of fair value at September 30, 2015 are subject to change. We expect to complete this process before we issue our financial statements for the three months ending December 31, 2015. The following table summarizes the preliminary estimates of the fair values of the assets acquired (and useful lives) and liabilities assumed:
Estimated At
Change
42
843
600
243
Natural gas liquids terminal and storage assets (230 years)
62,205
Vehicles and railcars (325 years)
75
68
32
Construction in progress
19,525
168,310
151,853
16,457
Intangible assets:
Customer relationships (15 years)
76,000
85,000
(9,000
Non-compete agreements (10 years)
4,300
12,000
(7,700
(931
(6,511
(1,015
(6,817
316,126
Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration paid for the acquired business over the fair value of the individual assets acquired, net of liabilities assumed. Goodwill primarily represents the value of synergies between the acquired business and the Partnership, the opportunity to use the acquired business as a platform for growth, and the acquired assembled workforce. We estimate that all of the goodwill will be deductible for federal income tax purposes.
We estimated the value of the customer relationship intangible asset using the income approach, which uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts (for example, cash flows or earnings) to a single present amount (discounted). The measurement is based on the value indicated by current market expectations about those future amounts.
16
The acquisition method of accounting requires that executory contracts with unfavorable terms relative to market conditions at the acquisition date be recorded as assets or liabilities in the acquisition accounting. Since certain storage leases were at unfavorable terms relative to acquisition-date market conditions, we recorded a liability of $12.8 million related to these leases in the acquisition accounting, a portion of which we recorded to accrued expenses and other payables and a portion of which we recorded to other noncurrent liabilities. We amortized $2.9 million of this balance as an increase to revenues during the six months ended September 30, 2015. We will amortize the remainder of this liability over the terms of the leases. The following table summarizes the future amortization of this liability (in thousands):
Year Ending March 31,
2016 (six months)
2,903
2017
4,905
2018
1,306
2019
88
Bakken Water Solutions Facilities
On November 21, 2014, we acquired two saltwater disposal facilities in the Bakken shale play in North Dakota for $34.6 million of cash. During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we completed the acquisition accounting for these water treatment and disposal facilities. The following table summarizes the final calculation of the fair values of the assets acquired (and useful lives) and liabilities assumed for these water treatment and disposal facilities:
Final
Vehicles (10 years)
63
Water treatment facilities and equipment (330 years)
5,815
Buildings and leasehold improvements (730 years)
130
4,421
6,560
(2,139
Customer relationships (7 years)
24,300
22,000
2,300
Other noncurrent assets
(304
(68
(236
34,600
TransMontaigne Inc.
On July 1, 2014, we acquired TransMontaigne for $200.3 million of cash, net of cash acquired (including $174.1 million paid at closing and $26.2 million paid upon completion of the working capital settlement). As part of this transaction, we also purchased $380.4 million of inventory from the previous owner of TransMontaigne (including $346.9 million paid at closing and $33.5 million subsequently paid as the working capital settlement process progressed). The operations of TransMontaigne include the marketing of refined products. As part of this transaction, we acquired the 2.0% general partner interest, the incentive distribution rights, a 19.7%
17
limited partner interest in TLP, and assumed certain terminaling service agreements with TLP from an affiliate of the previous owner of TransMontaigne.
During the three months ended June 30, 2015, we completed the acquisition accounting for this business combination. The following table summarizes the final calculation of the fair values of the assets acquired (and useful lives) and liabilities assumed for this acquisition:
1,469
199,366
197,829
1,537
528
373,870
15,110
15,001
109
Refined products terminal assets and equipment (20 years)
415,317
399,323
15,994
Vehicles
1,696
1,698
(2
Crude oil tanks and related equipment (20 years)
1,085
1,058
27
Information technology equipment
7,253
Buildings and leasehold improvements (20 years)
15,323
14,770
553
61,329
70,529
(9,200
Tank bottoms (indefinite life)
46,900
15,536
15,534
4,487
30,169
28,074
2,095
66,000
76,100
(10,100
Pipeline capacity rights (30 years)
87,618
240,583
3,911
(113,103
(113,066
(37
(69
(79,405
(78,427
(978
(1,919
Long-term debt
(234,000
(33,227
(545,120
580,707
18
The intangible asset for pipeline capacity rights relates to capacity allocations on a third-party refined products pipeline. Demand for use of this pipeline exceeds the pipelines capacity, and the limited capacity is allocated based on a shippers historical shipment volumes.
The fair value of the noncontrolling interests was calculated by multiplying the closing price of TLPs common units on the acquisition date by the number of TLP common units held by parties other than us, adjusted for a lack-of-control discount.
As described above, we are party to certain development agreements that provide us a right to purchase water solutions facilities developed by the other party to the agreements. During the year ended March 31, 2015, we purchased 16 water treatment and disposal facilities under these development agreements. We also purchased a 75% interest in one additional water treatment and disposal facility in July 2014 from a different seller. On a combined basis, we paid $190.0 million of cash and issued 1,322,032 common units, valued at $37.8 million, in exchange for these 17 facilities.
During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we completed the acquisition accounting for 12 of these water treatment and disposal facilities. The following table summarizes the final calculation of the fair values of the assets acquired (and useful lives) and liabilities assumed for these water treatment and disposal facilities:
939
253
62
60,784
5,701
2,122
93,358
Customer relationships (4 years)
10,000
50
(58
(1,092
(420
Noncontrolling interest
(5,775
166,025
19
We are in the process of identifying and determining the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for the other five water treatment and disposal facilities, and as a result, the estimates of fair value at September 30, 2015 are subject to change. We expect to complete this process before we issue our financial statements for the three months ending December 31, 2015. The following table summarizes the preliminary estimates of the fair values of the assets acquired (and useful lives) and liabilities assumed:
19,198
18,922
276
4,989
4,549
440
1,005
987
31
28
38,675
39,412
(737
(2,000
(162
61,736
During the year ended March 31, 2015, we acquired eight retail propane businesses. On a combined basis, we paid $39.1 million of cash and issued 132,100 common units, valued at $3.7 million, in exchange for these assets and operations.
20
During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we completed the acquisition accounting for all of these business combinations. The following table summarizes the final calculation of the fair values of the assets acquired (and useful lives) and liabilities assumed for these acquisitions:
2,237
771
110
Retail propane equipment (1520 years)
13,177
Vehicles and railcars (57 years)
2,332
Buildings and leasehold improvements (30 years)
534
784
(250
505
655
(150
Other (57 years)
118
116
8,097
Customer relationships (1015 years)
17,563
Non-compete agreements (57 years)
500
Trade names (312 years)
950
(1,523
(1,921
398
(1,750
(78
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
(760
42,783
21
Note 5Property, Plant and Equipment
Our property, plant and equipment consists of the following at the dates indicated:
Estimated
Description
Useful Lives
Natural gas liquids terminal and storage assets
230 years
134,335
132,851
Refined products terminal assets and equipment
20 years
439,154
403,609
Retail propane equipment
191,493
181,140
Vehicles and railcars
325 years
185,216
180,679
Water treatment facilities and equipment
330 years
405,382
317,317
Crude oil tanks and related equipment
240 years
113,524
109,909
Barges and towboats
540 years
78,718
59,848
37 years
39,558
34,915
Buildings and leasehold improvements
340 years
118,338
98,989
101,245
107,098
Tank bottoms
64,741
62,656
35,818
34,415
207,922
96,922
2,115,444
1,820,348
Accumulated depreciation
(270,332
(202,959
Net property, plant and equipment
The following table summarizes depreciation expense for the periods indicated:
34,469
28,387
70,264
46,870
Tank bottoms, which are product volumes required for the operation of storage tanks, are recorded at historical cost. We recover tank bottoms when the storage tanks are removed from service. The following table summarizes the tank bottoms included in the table above at the dates indicated:
September 30, 2015
March 31, 2015
Volume
Product
(in barrels) (in thousands)
Value (in thousands)
219
25,710
231
19,320
184
16,835
121
14,753
124
15,153
41
4,220
738
22
Note 6Goodwill
The following table summarizes changes in goodwill by segment for the six months ended September 30, 2015:
Refined
Crude Oil
Water
Retail
Products and
Logistics
Solutions
Balances at March 31, 2015
579,846
401,656
234,803
122,382
64,074
Revisions to acquisition accounting (Note 4)
(2,876
15,676
Acquisitions (Note 4)
68,305
4,186
72,491
Balances at September 30, 2015
467,085
251,260
126,568
66,169
Note 7Intangible Assets
Our intangible assets consist of the following at the dates indicated:
Gross Carrying
Amortization
Amortizable
Customer relationships
320 years
924,467
199,578
921,418
159,215
Pipeline capacity rights
30 years
119,636
4,565
2,571
Water facility development agreement
5 years
14,000
6,300
4,900
Executory contracts and other agreements
210 years
23,920
19,768
18,387
Non-compete agreements
19,388
12,169
26,662
10,408
Trade names
212 years
15,439
10,399
7,569
310 years
56,545
22,044
55,165
17,467
Total amortizable
1,173,395
274,823
1,176,240
220,517
Non-amortizable
Customer commitments
310,000
22,620
Total non-amortizable
332,620
1,506,015
1,508,860
The weighted-average remaining amortization period for intangible assets is approximately 11 years.
Amortization expense is as follows for the periods indicated:
Recorded In
22,291
21,711
46,328
42,604
Cost of sales
1,700
1,984
3,401
4,121
2,276
2,117
4,558
4,029
26,267
25,812
54,287
50,754
23
Expected amortization of our intangible assets, exclusive of assets that are not yet amortizable, is as follows (in thousands):
54,702
104,446
100,474
90,926
2020
84,159
Thereafter
463,865
898,572
Note 8Long-Term Debt
Our long-term debt consists of the following at the dates indicated:
Revolving credit facility
Expansion capital borrowings
1,083,000
702,500
Working capital borrowings
656,000
688,000
5.125% Notes due 2019
6.875% Notes due 2021
450,000
6.650% Notes due 2022
250,000
TLP credit facility
249,600
Other long-term debt
9,134
9,271
3,097,734
2,749,771
Less: Current maturities
Credit Agreement
We have entered into a credit agreement (as amended, the Credit Agreement) with a syndicate of banks. The Credit Agreement includes a revolving credit facility to fund working capital needs (the Working Capital Facility) and a revolving credit facility to fund acquisitions and expansion projects (the Expansion Capital Facility, and together with the Working Capital Facility, the Revolving Credit Facility). At September 30, 2015, our Revolving Credit Facility had a total capacity of $2.296 billion.
The Expansion Capital Facility had a total capacity of $1.258 billion for cash borrowings at September 30, 2015. At that date, we had outstanding borrowings of $1.083 billion on the Expansion Capital Facility. The Working Capital Facility had a total capacity of $1.038 billion for cash borrowings and letters of credit at September 30, 2015. At that date, we had outstanding borrowings of $656.0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $89.6 million on the Working Capital Facility. Amounts outstanding for letters of credit are not recorded as long-term debt on our condensed consolidated balance sheets, although they decrease our borrowing capacity under the Working Capital Facility. The capacity available under the Working Capital Facility may be limited by a borrowing base, as defined in the Credit Agreement, which is calculated based on the value of certain working capital items at any point in time. During October 2015, we entered into an agreement with the lenders to increase the total capacity on the Expansion Capital Facility by $150 million.
The commitments under the Credit Agreement mature on November 5, 2018. We have the right to prepay outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement without incurring any penalties, and prepayments of principal may be required if we enter into certain transactions to sell assets or obtain new borrowings.
24
All borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest, at our option, at either (i) an alternate base rate plus a margin of 0.50% to 1.50% per year or (ii) an adjusted LIBOR rate plus a margin of 1.50% to 2.50% per year. The applicable margin is determined based on our consolidated leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement. At September 30, 2015, the borrowings under the Credit Agreement were LIBOR borrowings with an interest rate at September 30, 2015 of 2.21%, calculated as the LIBOR rate of 0.21% plus a margin of 2.0%. At September 30, 2015, the interest rate in effect on letters of credit was 2.25%. Commitment fees are charged at a rate ranging from 0.38% to 0.50% on any unused capacity.
The Credit Agreement is secured by substantially all of our assets. The Credit Agreement specifies that our leverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, cannot exceed 4.25 to 1 at any quarter end. The leverage coverage ratio in our Credit Agreement excludes TLPs debt. At September 30, 2015, our leverage ratio was approximately 3.5 to 1. The Credit Agreement also specifies that our interest coverage ratio, as defined in the Credit Agreement, cannot be less than 2.75 to 1 at any quarter end. At September 30, 2015, our interest coverage ratio was approximately 5.9 to 1.
The Credit Agreement contains various customary representations, warranties, and additional covenants, including, without limitation, limitations on fundamental changes and limitations on indebtedness and liens. Our obligations under the Credit Agreement may be accelerated following certain events of default (subject to applicable cure periods), including, without limitation, (i) the failure to pay principal or interest when due, (ii) a breach by the Partnership or its subsidiaries of any material representation or warranty or any covenant made in the Credit Agreement, or (iii) certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency.
At September 30, 2015, we were in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Agreement.
2019 Notes
On July 9, 2014, we issued $400.0 million of 5.125% Senior Notes Due 2019 (the 2019 Notes). The 2019 Notes mature on July 15, 2019. Interest is payable on January 15 and July 15 of each year. We have the right to redeem the 2019 Notes before the maturity date, although we would be required to pay a premium for early redemption.
The Partnership and NGL Energy Finance Corp. are co-issuers of the 2019 Notes, and the obligations under the 2019 Notes are guaranteed by certain of our existing and future restricted subsidiaries that incur or guarantee indebtedness under certain of our other indebtedness, including the Revolving Credit Facility. The indenture governing the 2019 Notes contains various customary covenants, including, without limitation, limitations on fundamental changes and limitations on indebtedness and liens. Our obligations under the indenture may be accelerated following certain events of default (subject to applicable cure periods), including, without limitation, (i) the failure to pay principal or interest when due, (ii) experiencing an event of default on certain other debt agreements, or (iii) certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency.
At September 30, 2015, we were in compliance with the covenants under the indenture governing the 2019 Notes.
2021 Notes
On October 16, 2013, we issued $450.0 million of 6.875% Senior Notes Due 2021 (the 2021 Notes). The 2021 Notes mature on October 15, 2021. Interest is payable on April 15 and October 15 of each year. We have the right to redeem the 2021 Notes before the maturity date, although we would be required to pay a premium for early redemption.
The Partnership and NGL Energy Finance Corp. are co-issuers of the 2021 Notes, and the obligations under the 2021 Notes are guaranteed by certain of our existing and future restricted subsidiaries that incur or guarantee indebtedness under certain of our other indebtedness, including the Revolving Credit Facility. The indenture governing the 2021 Notes contains various customary covenants, including, without limitation, limitations on fundamental changes and limitations on indebtedness and liens. Our obligations under the indenture may be accelerated following certain events of default (subject to applicable cure periods), including, without limitation, (i) the failure to pay principal or interest when due, (ii) experiencing an event of default on certain other debt agreements, or (iii) certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency.
At September 30, 2015, we were in compliance with the covenants under the indenture governing the 2021 Notes.
25
2022 Notes
On June 19, 2012, we entered into a Note Purchase Agreement (as amended, the Note Purchase Agreement) whereby we issued $250.0 million of Senior Notes in a private placement (the 2022 Notes). The 2022 Notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 6.65%, which is payable quarterly. The 2022 Notes are required to be repaid in semi-annual installments of $25.0 million beginning on December 19, 2017 and ending on the maturity date of June 19, 2022. We have the option to prepay outstanding principal, although we would incur a prepayment penalty. The 2022 Notes are secured by substantially all of our assets and rank equal in priority with borrowings under the Credit Agreement.
The Note Purchase Agreement contains various customary representations, warranties, and additional covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to (subject to certain exceptions): (i) incur additional debt, (ii) pay dividends and make other restricted payments, (iii) create or permit certain liens, (iv) create or permit restrictions on the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us, (v) enter into transactions with affiliates, (vi) enter into sale and leaseback transactions and (vii) consolidate, merge, or sell all or substantially all or any portion of our assets. In addition, the Note Purchase Agreement contains similar leverage ratio and interest coverage ratio requirements to those of our Credit Agreement described above.
The Note Purchase Agreement provides for customary events of default that include, among other things (subject in certain cases to customary grace and cure periods): (i) failure to pay principal or interest when due, (ii) breach of certain covenants contained in the Note Purchase Agreement or the 2022 Notes, (iii) failure to pay certain other indebtedness or the acceleration of certain other indebtedness before maturity if the total amount of such indebtedness unpaid or accelerated exceeds $10.0 million, (iv) the rendering of a judgment for the payment of money in excess of $10.0 million, (v) the failure of the Note Purchase Agreement, the 2022 Notes, or the guarantees by the subsidiary guarantors to be in full force and effect in all material respects and (vi) certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs (subject to certain exceptions), the trustee or the holders of at least 51% in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding 2022 Notes may declare all of the 2022 Notes to be due and payable immediately.
At September 30, 2015, we were in compliance with the covenants under the Note Purchase Agreement.
TLP Credit Facility
TLP is party to a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks that provides for a revolving credit facility (the TLP Credit Facility). The TLP Credit Facility provides for a maximum borrowing line of credit equal to the lesser of (i) $400 million or (ii) 4.75 times Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the TLP Credit Facility). The terms of the TLP Credit Facility include covenants that restrict TLPs ability to make cash distributions, acquisitions and investments, including investments in joint ventures. TLP may make distributions of cash to the extent of TLPs available cash as defined in TLPs partnership agreement. TLP may make acquisitions and investments that meet the definition of permitted acquisitions, other investments which may not exceed 5% of consolidated net tangible assets, and additional future permitted JV investments up to $125 million, which may include additional investments in BOSTCO. The commitments under the TLP Credit Facility mature on July 31, 2018.
TLP may elect to have loans under the TLP Credit Facility bear interest at either (i) a rate of LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 2% to 3% depending on the total leverage ratio then in effect, or (ii) the base rate plus a margin ranging from 1% to 2% depending on the total leverage ratio then in effect. TLP also pays commitment fees on any unused capacity, ranging from 0.375% to 0.5% per year, depending on the total leverage ratio then in effect. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, the weighted-average interest rate on borrowings under the TLP Credit Facility was approximately 2.6%. TLPs obligations under the TLP Credit Facility are secured by a first priority security interest in favor of the lenders in the majority of TLPs assets, including TLPs investments in unconsolidated entities. At September 30, 2015, TLP had outstanding borrowings under the TLP Credit Facility of $249.6 million and no outstanding letters of credit.
The TLP Credit Facility also contains customary representations and warranties (including those relating to organization and authorization, compliance with laws, absence of defaults, material agreements and litigation) and customary events of default (including those relating to monetary defaults, covenant defaults, cross defaults and bankruptcy events). The primary financial covenants contained in the TLP Credit Facility are (i) a total leverage ratio test (not to exceed 4.75 times), (ii) a senior secured leverage ratio test (not to exceed 3.75 times) if TLP issues senior unsecured notes, and (iii) a minimum interest coverage ratio test (not less than 3.0 times). These financial covenants are based on Consolidated EBITDA as defined in the TLP Credit Facility. The TLP Credit Facility is non-recourse to the Partnership. At September 30, 2015, TLP was in compliance with the covenants under the TLP Credit Facility.
26
The following table summarizes our basis in the assets and liabilities of TLP at September 30, 2015, inclusive of the impact of our acquisition accounting for the business combination with TransMontaigne (in thousands):
791
3,074
679
1,250
858
Property, plant and equipment, net
477,357
Intangible assets, net
61,696
255,757
968
(6,760
(121
Net intercompany payable
(1,911
(7,054
Advanced payments received from customers
(151
(249,600
(3,441
Net assets
563,561
Other Long-Term Debt
We have executed various noninterest bearing notes payable, primarily related to non-compete agreements entered into in connection with acquisitions of businesses. We also have certain notes payable related to equipment financing.
Debt Maturity Schedule
The scheduled maturities of our long-term debt are as follows at September 30, 2015:
Revolving
TLP
Credit
2021
2022
Long-Term
Facility
Notes
Debt
1,891
2,879
25,000
2,129
27,129
1,739,000
1,413
2,040,013
344
450,344
125,000
478
575,478
Note 9Income Taxes
We qualify as a partnership for income tax purposes. As such, we generally do not pay United States federal income tax. Rather, each owner reports his or her proportionate share of our income or loss on his or her individual tax return. The aggregate difference in the basis of our net assets for financial and tax reporting purposes cannot be readily determined, as we do not have access to information regarding each partners basis in the Partnership.
We have certain taxable corporate subsidiaries in the United States and in Canada, and our operations in Texas are subject to a state franchise tax that is calculated based on revenues net of cost of sales. Our fiscal years 2012 to 2015 generally remain subject to examination by federal, state, and Canadian tax authorities.
A publicly traded partnership is required to generate at least 90% of its gross income (as defined for federal income tax purposes) from certain qualifying sources. Income generated by our taxable corporate subsidiaries is excluded from this qualifying income calculation. Although we routinely generate income outside of our corporate subsidiaries that is non-qualifying, we believe that at least 90% of our gross income has been qualifying income for each of the calendar years since our initial public offering.
We evaluate uncertain tax positions for recognition and measurement in the consolidated financial statements. To recognize a tax position, we determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation, based on the technical merits of the position. A tax position that meets the more likely than not threshold is measured to determine the amount of benefit to be recognized in the consolidated financial statements. We had no material uncertain tax positions that required recognition in our condensed consolidated financial statements at September 30, 2015 or March 31, 2015.
Note 10Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Contingencies
We are party to various claims, legal actions, and complaints arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of our management, the ultimate resolution of these claims, legal actions, and complaints, after consideration of amounts accrued, insurance coverage, and other arrangements, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, the outcome of such matters is inherently uncertain, and estimates of our liabilities may change materially as circumstances develop.
Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject to extensive federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations. Although we believe our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations, risks of additional costs and liabilities are inherent in our business, and there can be no assurance that we will not incur significant costs. Moreover, it is possible that other developments, such as increasingly stringent environmental laws, regulations and enforcement policies thereunder, and claims for damages to property or persons resulting from the operations, could result in substantial costs. Accordingly, we have adopted policies, practices, and procedures in the areas of pollution control, product safety, occupational health, and the handling, storage, use, and disposal of hazardous materials designed to prevent material environmental or other damage, and to limit the financial liability that could result from such events. However, some risk of environmental or other damage is inherent in our business.
Asset Retirement Obligations
Our condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2015 includes a liability of $4.8 million related to asset retirement obligations, which is reported within other noncurrent liabilities. This liability is related to contractual and regulatory obligations at certain facilities for which we have to perform remediation, dismantlement, or removal activities when the assets are retired.
In addition to the obligations described above, we may be required to remove facilities or perform other remediation upon retirement of certain other assets. We believe the present value of these asset retirement obligations, under current laws and regulations, after considering the estimated lives of our facilities, is not material to our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Our liability for asset retirement obligations is discounted to present value. To calculate the liability, we make estimates and assumptions about the retirement cost and the timing of retirement. Changes in our assumptions and estimates may occur as a result of the passage of time and the occurrence of future events.
Operating Leases
We have executed various noncancelable operating lease agreements for product storage, office space, vehicles, real estate, railcars, and equipment. The following table summarizes future minimum lease payments under these agreements at September 30, 2015 (in thousands):
60,441
106,125
90,783
66,385
56,509
123,193
503,436
The following table summarizes rental expense for operating leases for the periods indicated:
33,354
29,333
67,075
54,633
Pipeline Capacity Agreements
We have executed noncancelable agreements with crude oil and refined products pipeline operators, which guarantee us minimum monthly shipping capacity on the pipelines. As a result, we are required to pay the minimum shipping fees if actual shipments are less than our allotted capacity. The following table summarizes future minimum throughput payments under these agreements at September 30, 2015 (in thousands):
56,753
85,349
85,435
84,643
74,811
90,972
477,963
29
Sales and Purchase Contracts
We have entered into product sales and purchase contracts for which we expect the parties to physically settle and deliver the inventory in future periods. The following table summarizes such commitments at September 30, 2015:
Value
Purchase commitments:
Natural gas liquids fixed-price (gallons)
61,618
38,073
Natural gas liquids index-price (gallons)
526,956
264,790
Crude oil fixed-price (barrels)
578
Crude oil index-price (barrels)
7,982
336,151
Sale commitments:
179,849
127,038
253,827
194,588
1,018
46,279
7,842
391,920
We account for the contracts shown in the table above as normal purchases and normal sales. Under this accounting policy election, we do not record the contracts at fair value at each balance sheet date; instead, we record the purchase or sale at the contracted value once the delivery occurs. Contracts in the table above may have offsetting derivative contracts (see Note 12) or inventory positions (see Note 2).
Certain other forward purchase and sale contracts do not qualify for the normal purchase and normal sale election. These contracts are recorded at fair value in our condensed consolidated balance sheet and are not included in the table above. These contracts are included in the derivative disclosures in Note 12, and represent $21.6 million of our prepaid expenses and other current assets and $13.5 million of our accrued expenses and other payables at September 30, 2015.
Note 11Equity
Partnership Equity
The Partnerships equity consists of a 0.1% general partner interest and a 99.9% limited partner interest, which consists of common units. Our general partner is not required to make any additional capital contributions or to guarantee or pay any of our debts and obligations.
Common Units Issued in Business Combinations
During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we issued 386,383 common units as consideration for a water solutions facility acquisition. In October 2015, we issued 52,199 common units as partial consideration of the acquisition of a retail propane business.
Unit Repurchase Program
On September 10, 2015, the Board of Directors of our general partner authorized a unit repurchase program, under which we may repurchase up to $45 million of our outstanding common units through March 31, 2016. We may repurchase units from time to time in the open market or in other privately negotiated transactions. The unit repurchase program authorization does not obligate us to repurchase any dollar amount or number of our units. During September 2015, we repurchased 157,626 common units for an aggregate price of $3.7 million.
Our Distribution Policy
Our general partner has adopted a cash distribution policy that requires us to pay a quarterly distribution to unitholders as of the record date to the extent we have sufficient cash from operations after establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and
expenses, including payments to the general partner and its affiliates, referred to as available cash. The general partner will also receive, in addition to distributions on its 0.1% general partner interest, additional distributions based on the level of distributions to the limited partners. These distributions are referred to as incentive distributions or IDRs. Our general partner currently holds the IDRs, but may transfer these rights separately from its general partner interest, subject to restrictions in our partnership agreement.
The following table illustrates the percentage allocations of available cash from operating surplus between our limited partners and our general partner based on the specified target distribution levels. The amounts set forth under Marginal Percentage Interest In Distributions are the percentage interests of our general partner and our limited partners in any available cash from operating surplus we distribute up to and including the corresponding amount in the column Total Quarterly Distribution Per Unit, until available cash from operating surplus we distribute reaches the next target distribution level, if any. The percentage interests shown for our limited partners and our general partner for the minimum quarterly distribution are also applicable to quarterly distribution amounts that are less than the minimum quarterly distribution. The percentage interests set forth below for our general partner include its 0.1% general partner interest, and assume that our general partner has contributed any additional capital necessary to maintain its 0.1% general partner interest and has not transferred its IDRs.
Marginal Percentage Interest In
Total Quarterly Distribution Per Unit
General Partner
Minimum quarterly distribution
0.337500
99.9
0.1
First target distribution
above
up to
0.388125
Second target distribution
0.421875
86.9
13.1
Third target distribution
0.506250
76.9
23.1
51.9
48.1
In October 2015, we declared a distribution of $0.64 per common unit, to be paid on November 13, 2015 to unitholders of record on November 3, 2015. This distribution is expected to be $83.6 million, including amounts to be paid on common and general partner notional units as well as an incentive distribution.
TLPs Distribution Policy
TLPs partnership agreement requires it to pay a quarterly distribution to unitholders as of the record date to the extent TLP has sufficient cash from operations after establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses, including payments to TLPs general partner and its affiliates, referred to as available cash. TLPs general partner will also receive, in addition to distributions on its 2.0% general partner interest, additional distributions based on the level of distributions to the limited partners. These distributions are referred to as incentive distributions or IDRs. TLPs general partner currently holds the IDRs, but may transfer these rights separately from its general partner interest, subject to restrictions in TLPs partnership agreement.
The following table illustrates the percentage allocations of available cash from operating surplus between TLPs limited partners and TLPs general partner based on the specified target distribution levels. The amounts set forth under Marginal Percentage Interest In Distributions are the percentage interests of TLPs general partner and TLPs limited partners in any available cash from operating surplus TLP distributes up to and including the corresponding amount in the column Total Quarterly Distribution Per Unit, until available cash from operating surplus TLP distributes reaches the next target distribution level, if any. The percentage interests shown for TLPs limited partners and TLPs general partner for the minimum quarterly distribution are also applicable to quarterly distribution amounts that are less than the minimum quarterly distribution. The percentage interests set forth below for TLPs general partner include its 2.0% general partner interest, and assume that TLPs general partner has contributed any additional capital necessary to maintain its 2.0% general partner interest and has not transferred its IDRs.
0.40
98
0.44
0.50
85
0.60
In October 2015, TLP declared a distribution of $0.6650 per unit, which was paid on November 6, 2015. We received a total of $4.0 million from this distribution on our general partner interest, IDRs, and limited partner interest. The noncontrolling interest owners received a total of $8.6 million from this distribution.
Equity-Based Incentive Compensation
Our general partner has adopted a long-term incentive plan (LTIP), which allows for the issuance of equity-based incentive compensation. Our general partner has granted certain restricted units to employees and directors, which vest in tranches, subject to the continued service of the recipients. The awards may also vest in the event of a change in control, at the discretion of the board of directors. No distributions accrue to or are paid on the restricted units during the vesting period. The restricted units include awards that vest contingent on the continued service of the recipients through the vesting date (the Service Awards). The restricted units also include awards that are contingent both on the continued service of the recipients through the vesting date and also on the performance of our common units relative to other entities in the Alerian MLP Index (the Index) over specified periods of time (the Performance Awards).
The following table summarizes the Service Award activity during the six months ended September 30, 2015:
Unvested Service Award units at March 31, 2015
2,260,400
Units granted
787,562
Units vested and issued
(820,017
Units withheld for employee taxes
(443,663
Units forfeited
(64,000
Unvested Service Award units at September 30, 2015
1,720,282
The following table summarizes the scheduled vesting of our unvested Service Award units:
Number of Units
45,000
820,641
747,641
107,000
We record the expense for the first tranche of each Service Award on a straight-line basis over the period beginning with the grant date of the awards and ending with the vesting date of the tranche. We record the expense for succeeding tranches over the period beginning with the vesting date of the previous tranche and ending with the vesting date of the tranche. At each balance sheet date, we adjust the cumulative expense recorded using the estimated fair value of the awards at the balance sheet date. We calculate the fair value of the awards using the closing price of our common units on the New York Stock Exchange on the balance sheet date, adjusted to reflect the fact that the holders of the unvested units are not entitled to distributions during the vesting period. We estimate the impact of the lack of distribution rights during the vesting period using the value of the most recent distribution and assumptions that a market participant might make about future distribution growth. The following table summarizes expense related to Service Award units for the periods indicated:
14,859
13,745
33,362
21,659
Of the restricted units granted and vested during the six months ended September 30, 2015, 465,239 units were granted as a bonus for performance during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. We accrued expense of $10.0 million during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 and $3.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2015 for estimates of the value of such bonus units that would be granted. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we reversed $2.0 million of this expense to true-up the estimate to the $11.8 million of actual expense associated with these bonuses. Since the units were not formally granted until July 2015, the full $11.8 million value is reflected in the expense during the three months ended September 30, 2015 in the table above.
The following table summarizes the estimated future expense we expect to record on the unvested Service Award units at September 30, 2015 (in thousands), after taking into consideration estimated forfeitures of approximately 167,000 units. For purposes of this calculation, we used the closing price of our common units on September 30, 2015, which was $19.97.
8,364
13,533
4,461
1,063
27,421
33
The following table is a rollforward of the liability related to the Service Award units, which is reported within accrued expenses and other payables in our condensed consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):
Balance at March 31, 2015
6,154
Expense recorded
Value of units vested and issued
(23,261
Taxes paid on behalf of participants
(12,663
Balance at September 30, 2015
3,592
The weighted-average fair value of the Service Award units at September 30, 2015 was $16.35 per common unit, which was calculated as the closing price of our common units on September 30, 2015, adjusted to reflect the fact that the restricted units are not entitled to distributions during the vesting period. The impact of the lack of distribution rights during the vesting period was estimated using the value of the most recent distribution and assumptions that a market participant might make about future distribution growth.
During April 2015, our general partner granted Performance Award units to certain employees. The following table summarizes the maximum number of units that could vest on these Performance Awards for each vesting tranche, taking into consideration any Performance Awards that have been forfeited since the grant date:
Maximum Performance
Vesting Date of Tranche
Award Units
July 1, 2016
685,382
July 1, 2017
677,382
1,362,764
The number of Performance Award units that will vest is contingent on the performance of our common units relative to the performance of the other entities in the Index. Performance will be calculated based on the return on our common units (including changes in the market price of the common units and distributions paid during the performance period) relative to the returns on the common units of the other entities in the Index. Performance will be measured over the following periods:
Performance Period for Tranche
July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2016
July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2017
The following table summarizes the percentage of the maximum Performance Award units that will vest depending on the percentage of entities in the Index that NGL outperforms:
Percentage of Entities in the
Percentage of Maximum
Index that NGL Outperforms
Performance Award Units to Vest
Less than 50%
0%
50%75%
25%50%
75%90%
50%100%
Greater than 90%
100%
The April 2015 Performance Award grants included a tranche that vested on July 1, 2015. During the July 1, 2012 through June 30, 2015 performance period, the return on our common units exceeded the return on 83% of our peer companies in the Index. As a result, the July 1, 2015 tranche of the Performance Awards vested at 76% of the maximum number of awards, and 530,564 common units vested on July 1, 2015. Of these units, recipients elected for us to withhold 210,137 common units for employee taxes, valued at $6.4 million. We issued the remaining 320,427 common units, valued at $9.7 million, on July 1, 2015.
34
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value for each unvested tranche at September 30, 2015 (without consideration of estimated forfeitures):
Fair Value of
Unvested Awards
4,276
2,906
7,182
We record the expense for each of the tranches of the Performance Awards on a straight-line basis over the period beginning with the grant date and ending with the vesting date of the tranche. At each balance sheet date, we adjust the cumulative expense recorded using the estimated fair value of the awards at the balance sheet date. We calculate the fair value of the awards using a Monte Carlo simulation. The following table summarizes the expense recorded for each vesting tranche during the periods indicated:
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2015
July 1, 2015
15,469
609
16,078
1,720
(220
1,500
602
(60
542
17,791
329
18,120
The following table summarizes the estimated future expense we expect to record on the unvested Performance Award units at September 30, 2015 (in thousands), after taking into consideration estimated forfeitures. For purposes of this calculation, we used the September 30, 2015 fair value of the Performance Awards.
2,321
2,080
307
4,708
The following table is a rollforward of the liability related to the Performance Award units, which is reported within accrued expenses and other payables in our condensed consolidated balance sheets (in thousands):
(9,658
(6,420
2,042
The number of common units that may be delivered pursuant to awards under the LTIP is limited to 10% of the issued and outstanding common units. The maximum number of units deliverable under the LTIP plan automatically increases to 10% of the issued and outstanding common units immediately after each issuance of common units, unless the plan administrator determines to increase the maximum number of units deliverable by a lesser amount. Units withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations are not considered to be delivered under the LTIP. In addition, when an award is forfeited, canceled, exercised, paid or otherwise terminates or expires without the delivery of units, the units subject to such award are again available for new awards under the LTIP. At September 30, 2015, approximately 5.3 million common units remain available for issuance under the LTIP.
35
Note 12Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current assets and liabilities (excluding derivative instruments) are carried at amounts which reasonably approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature.
Commodity Derivatives
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of our commodity derivative assets and liabilities reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheet at the dates indicated:
Derivative
Assets
Liabilities
Level 1 measurements
41,612
(5,314
83,779
(3,969
Level 2 measurements
27,464
(15,070
34,963
(28,764
69,076
(20,384
118,742
(32,733
Netting of counterparty contracts (1)
(3,537
3,537
(1,804
1,804
Net cash collateral provided (held)
(17,980
3,118
(56,660
2,979
Commodity derivatives in condensed consolidated balance sheet
47,559
(13,729
60,278
(27,950
(1) Relates to commodity derivative assets and liabilities that are expected to be net settled on an exchange or through a netting arrangement with the counterparty.
The following table summarizes the accounts that include our commodity derivative assets and liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets:
Net commodity derivative asset
33,830
32,328
36
The following table summarizes our open commodity derivative contract positions at the dates indicated. We do not account for these derivatives as hedges.
Net Long (Short)
Fair Value
Notional
of
Net Assets
Contracts
Settlement Period
(Barrels)
(Liabilities)
At September 30, 2015
Cross-commodity (1)
October 2015March 2017
86
886
Crude oil fixed-price (2)
October 2015December 2016
(1,540
3,407
Propane fixed-price (2)
October 2015December 2017
(3,925
Refined products fixed-price (2)
October 2015January 2017
(3,580
43,331
October 2015June 2016
4,993
48,692
Net cash collateral held
(14,862
Net commodity derivatives in condensed consolidated balance sheet
At March 31, 2015
April 2015March 2016
(105
April 2015June 2015
(1,113
(171
Crude oil index-price (3)
April 2015July 2015
751
1,835
April 2015December 2016
193
(2,842
April 2015December 2015
(3,005
84,996
2,296
86,009
(53,681
(1) Cross-commodityWe may purchase or sell a physical commodity where the underlying contract pricing mechanisms are tied to different commodity price indices. These contracts are derivatives we have entered into as an economic hedge against the risk of one commodity price moving relative to another commodity price.
(2) Commodity fixed-priceWe may have fixed price physical purchases, including inventory, offset by floating price physical sales or floating price physical purchases offset by fixed price physical sales. These contracts are derivatives we have entered into as an economic hedge against the risk of mismatches between fixed and floating price physical obligations.
(3) Commodity index-priceWe may purchase or sell a physical commodity where the underlying contract pricing mechanisms are tied to different indices. These indices may vary in the commodity grade or location, or in the timing of delivery within a given month. These contracts are derivatives we have entered into as an economic hedge against the risk of one index moving relative to another index.
37
The following table summarizes the net gains recorded from our commodity derivatives to cost of sales for the periods indicated:
85,777
55,981
44,534
38,496
Credit Risk
We have credit policies with regard to our counterparties on derivative financial instruments that we believe minimize our overall credit risk, including an evaluation of potential counterparties financial condition (including credit ratings), collateral requirements under certain circumstances, and the use of industry standard master netting agreements, which allow for offsetting counterparty receivable and payable balances for certain transactions. At September 30, 2015, our primary counterparties were retailers, resellers, energy marketers, producers, refiners, and dealers. This concentration of counterparties may impact our overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or negatively, as the counterparties may be similarly affected by changes in economic, regulatory or other conditions. If a counterparty does not perform on a contract, we may not realize amounts that have been recorded in our condensed consolidated balance sheets and recognized in our net income.
Interest Rate Risk
Our Revolving Credit Facility is variable-rate debt with interest rates that are generally indexed to bank prime or LIBOR interest rates. At September 30, 2015, we had $1.739 billion of outstanding borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility at a rate of 2.21%. A change in interest rates of 0.125% would result in an increase or decrease of our annual interest expense of $2.2 million, based on borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2015.
The TLP Credit Facility is variable-rate debt with interest rates that are generally indexed to bank prime or LIBOR interest rates. At September 30, 2015, TLP had $249.6 million of outstanding borrowings under the TLP Credit Facility at a rate of 2.72%. A change in interest rates of 0.125% would result in an increase or decrease in TLPs annual interest expense of $0.3 million, based on borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2015.
Fair Value of Fixed-Rate Notes
The following table provides fair value estimates of our fixed-rate notes at September 30, 2015 (in thousands):
378,000
446,625
254,175
For the 2019 Notes and the 2021 Notes, the fair value estimates were developed based on publicly traded quotes and would be classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. For the 2022 Notes, the fair value estimate was developed using observed yields on publicly traded notes issued by other entities, adjusted for differences in the key terms of those notes and the key terms of our notes (examples include differences in the tenor of the debt, credit standing of the issuer, whether the notes are publicly traded, and whether the notes are secured or unsecured). This fair value estimate would be classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
Note 13Segments
The following table summarizes certain financial data related to our segments. Transactions between segments are recorded based on prices negotiated between the segments.
38
Our liquids and retail propane segments each consist of two divisions, which are organized based on the location of the operations. The corporate and other category consists primarily of certain corporate expenses that are not allocated to the reportable segments.
Revenues(1):
Crude oil logistics
Crude oil sales
997,106
2,109,618
2,309,889
4,038,673
Crude oil transportation and other
12,746
11,581
31,695
21,584
Water solutions
Service fees
35,203
24,238
71,941
41,939
Recovered hydrocarbons
10,746
23,334
26,564
47,349
Water transportation
5,147
10,745
Other revenues
1,545
3,282
Liquids
Propane sales
98,770
240,933
204,260
463,736
Other product sales
160,836
306,660
308,347
595,075
10,122
6,279
19,622
11,582
Retail propane
36,119
48,552
79,304
100,578
Distillate sales
7,678
11,530
20,625
30,225
9,409
8,276
17,724
15,457
Refined products and renewables
Refined products sales
1,704,259
2,466,389
3,413,208
3,452,612
Renewables sales
93,189
116,825
199,342
248,099
28,739
24,006
56,812
Corporate and other
Elimination of intersegment sales
(13,272
(24,175
(30,951
(75,314
Total revenues
Depreciation and Amortization:
10,053
9,240
20,055
18,971
22,416
17,573
43,262
34,665
2,745
3,384
7,749
6,585
8,909
7,684
17,615
15,255
11,152
11,917
25,327
12,761
1,486
301
2,584
1,237
Total depreciation and amortization
Operating Income (Loss):
(75
11,885
1,501
205
14,792
(2,867
13,885
20,370
10,929
19,899
10,016
(1,765
(3,062
(2,465
(4,648
(5,244
8,822
27,776
7,567
(13,245
(23,749
(68,711
(41,106
Total operating income (loss)
(1) During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we made certain changes in the way we attribute revenues to the categories shown in the table above. These changes did not impact total revenues. We have retrospectively adjusted previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.
39
The following table summarizes additions to property, plant and equipment by segment. This information has been prepared on the accrual basis, and includes property, plant and equipment acquired in acquisitions.
Additions to property, plant and equipment:
44,384
39,464
107,023
81,413
56,531
40,610
117,020
48,072
18,886
1,911
36,064
3,070
12,748
9,567
19,643
12,411
7,588
512,281
23,283
1,809
1,169
3,262
140,137
605,642
304,202
660,509
The following tables summarize long-lived assets (consisting of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, and goodwill) and total assets by segment:
Long-lived assets, net:
1,412,181
1,327,538
1,275,920
1,119,794
559,763
534,560
477,391
467,652
795,167
808,757
46,810
50,192
4,567,232
4,308,493
Total assets:
2,088,087
2,337,188
1,375,023
1,185,929
770,052
713,547
541,002
542,476
1,549,577
1,668,836
126,096
99,525
Note 14Transactions with Affiliates
SemGroup Corporation (SemGroup) holds ownership interests in our general partner. We sell product to and purchase product from SemGroup, and these transactions are included within revenues and cost of sales, respectively, in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. We also lease crude oil storage from SemGroup.
We purchase ethanol from one of our equity method investees. These transactions are reported within cost of sales in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Certain members of our management and members of their families own interests in entities from which we have purchased products and services and to which we have sold products and services. During the six months ended September 30, 2015, $23.2 million of these transactions were capital expenditures and were recorded as increases to property, plant and equipment.
40
The following table summarizes these related party transactions:
Sales to SemGroup
4,593
37,600
42,031
63,583
Purchases from SemGroup
6,478
46,564
45,303
85,684
Sales to equity method investees
9,131
3,086
Purchases from equity method investees
24,816
34,689
55,764
70,965
Sales to entities affiliated with management
91
1,706
198
1,854
Purchases from entities affiliated with management
16,214
3,845
23,394
6,984
Accounts receivable from affiliates consist of the following at the dates indicated:
Receivables from SemGroup
5,456
13,443
Receivables from equity method investees
652
Receivables from entities affiliated with management
210
3,103
Accounts payable to affiliates consist of the following at the dates indicated:
Payables to SemGroup
5,912
11,546
Payables to equity method investees
4,741
6,788
Payables to entities affiliated with management
8,141
7,460
We also have a loan receivable of $23.8 million at September 30, 2015 from one of our equity method investees. The investee is required to make monthly principal payments beginning on June 1, 2018 with the remaining principal balance due on May 31, 2020.
Note 15Condensed Consolidating Guarantor and Non-Guarantor Financial Information
Certain of our wholly owned subsidiaries have, jointly and severally, fully and unconditionally guaranteed the 2019 Notes and 2021 Notes (see Note 8). Pursuant to Rule 310 of Regulation S-X, we have presented in columnar format the condensed consolidating financial information for NGL Energy Partners LP, NGL Energy Finance Corp. (which, along with NGL Energy Partners LP, is a co-issuer of the 2019 Notes and 2021 Notes), the guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis, and the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis in the tables below.
There are no significant restrictions that prevent the parent or any of the guarantor subsidiaries from obtaining funds from their respective subsidiaries by dividend or loan, other than restrictions contained in TLPs Credit Facility. None of the assets of the guarantor subsidiaries (other than the investments in non-guarantor subsidiaries) are restricted net assets pursuant to Rule 4-08(e)(3) of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
For purposes of the tables below, (i) the condensed consolidating financial information is presented on a legal entity basis, (ii) investments in consolidated subsidiaries are accounted for as equity method investments, and (iii) contributions, distributions, and advances to (from) consolidated entities are reported on a net basis within net changes in advances with consolidated entities in the condensed consolidating statement of cash flow tables below.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
NGL Energy
Partners LP
Guarantor
Non-Guarantor
Consolidating
(Parent) (1)
Finance Corp. (1)
Subsidiaries
Adjustments
Consolidated
23,042
4,547
2,464
Accounts receivabletrade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
702,282
9,743
Accounts receivableaffiliates
5,666
406,633
1,741
103,017
17,105
1,222,145
31,732
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation
1,300,194
544,918
1,458,567
32,361
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net of accumulated amortization
16,090
1,150,618
64,484
217,482
NET INTERCOMPANY RECEIVABLES (PAYABLES)
1,465,775
(1,428,990
(36,785
INVESTMENTS IN CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
1,556,474
77,741
(1,634,215
LOAN RECEIVABLEAFFILIATE
107,215
1,457
3,061,381
4,128,747
893,924
Accounts payabletrade
559,744
8,779
Accounts payableaffiliates
18,672
19,233
137,095
8,105
95,573
807
3,859
181
19,234
814,943
17,993
1,100,000
1,743,548
250,146
13,782
3,897
Partners equity
1,942,147
622,024
(2,178,362
1,942,283
621,888
(1)
The parent and NGL Energy Finance Corp. are co-issuers of the 2019 Notes and 2021 Notes. Since the parent received the proceeds from the issuance of the 2019 Notes and 2021 Notes, all activity has been reflected in the parent column.
43
29,115
9,757
2,431
1,007,001
17,225
16,610
583
440,026
1,736
104,528
16,327
29,120
1,577,922
38,302
1,093,018
524,371
1,372,690
30,071
17,834
1,195,896
74,613
217,600
255,073
1,363,792
(1,319,724
(44,068
1,834,738
56,690
(1,891,428
110,120
2,717
3,245,484
4,312,366
881,079
820,441
12,939
25,690
19,690
165,819
9,607
53,903
331
4,413
59
1,070,266
23,040
1,395,100
250,199
12,262
3,824
2,125,794
604,125
(2,438,754
2,125,903
604,016
44
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
REVENUES
3,153,370
49,442
(9,617
COST OF SALES
3,009,777
5,610
(9,561
77,166
22,663
(56
24,538
4,760
45,006
11,755
Loss (gain) on disposal or impairment of assets, net
1,294
(3
(4,411
4,657
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated entities
(23
2,455
(17,913
(11,351
(2,381
74
Other income, net
1,916
113
(74
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
(13,869
4,844
INCOME TAX (PROVISION) BENEFIT
2,793
(7
EQUITY IN NET INCOME (LOSS) OF CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
(9,130
1,946
7,184
Net Income (Loss)
4,837
NET INCOME (LOSS) ALLOCATED TO LIMITED PARTNERS
(11,873
The parent and NGL Energy Finance Corp. are co-issuers of the 2019 Notes and 2021 Notes.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
5,325,186
55,364
(24
.
5,161,935
17,554
80,084
17,335
36,360
5,279
38,999
11,100
4,216
(82
Operating Income
4,178
2,310
1,387
(17,201
(9,956
(1,506
Other expense, net
(524
(81
(12
(4,578
3,978
1,951
(29
(2,023
604
1,419
3,949
(12,982
(1) The parent and NGL Energy Finance Corp. are co-issuers of the 2019 Notes and 2021 Notes.
46
6,650,251
100,621
(19,208
6,333,438
14,022
164,790
43,022
(125
81,208
10,571
90,545
26,047
1,715
(21,445
6,962
2,872
8,278
(35,714
(22,344
(4,463
148
691
237
(148
(40,226
11,014
2,286
(38
(33,730
4,210
29,520
10,976
(8,771
47
Six Months Ended September 30, 2014
8,952,772
76,421
(53
8,676,881
36,690
146,145
18,710
64,124
5,388
77,545
11,929
4,774
(208
(16,697
3,912
4,875
(29,593
(18,058
(1,517
(1,056
71
(30,936
3,853
993
(106
(29,606
337
29,269
3,747
5,422
48
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss)
4,818
(Parent) (2)
Finance Corp. (2)
(26
(2,019
3,923
(2) The parent and NGL Energy Finance Corp. are co-issuers of the 2019 Notes and 2021 Notes.
49
10,949
189
(29,417
3,721
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
(34,469
173,058
35,506
(184,680
(37,596
3,565
(2,700
(4,226
5,652
2,555
(301,665
(39,265
1,311,500
43,200
(963,000
(43,600
(2,274
(70
(180
(1,249
Net changes in advances with consolidated entities
186,776
(203,533
16,757
28,396
123,397
3,792
(6,073
(5,210
51
(23,563
(56,019
17,947
(81,710
(1,141
(657,514
(1,250
(6,106
(20,284
2,774
1,875
(729,488
(20,800
1,923,500
56,000
(1,766,000
(38,000
(4,173
(7,478
(1,720
(627,132
632,995
(5,863
25,223
784,602
3,481
1,660
(905
628
1,181
8,728
531
2,841
7,823
1,159
52
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following is a discussion of NGL Energy Partners LPs (we, us, our, or the Partnership) financial condition and results of operations as of and for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2015. The discussion should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 (Annual Report).
Overview
We are a Delaware limited partnership. NGL Energy Holdings LLC serves as our general partner. At September 30, 2015, our operations include:
Crude Oil Logistics
Our crude oil logistics segment purchases crude oil from producers and transports it for resale at owned and leased pipeline injection stations, storage terminals, barge loading facilities, rail facilities, refineries, and other trade hubs. We attempt to reduce our exposure to price fluctuations by using back-to-back physical contracts whenever possible. When back-to-back physical contracts are not optimal, we enter into financially settled derivative contracts as economic hedges of our physical inventory, physical sales and physical purchase contracts.
Most of our contracts to purchase or sell crude oil are at floating prices that are indexed to published rates in active markets such as Cushing, Oklahoma. We seek to manage exposure to price fluctuations by entering into purchase and sale contracts of similar volumes based on similar indexes and by hedging exposure due to fluctuations in actual volumes and scheduled volumes. We use our transportation assets to move crude oil from the wellhead to the highest value market. Spreads between crude oil prices in different markets can fluctuate, which may expand or limit our opportunity to generate margins by transporting crude oil to different markets.
The following table summarizes the range of low and high spot crude oil prices per barrel of NYMEX West Texas Intermediate Crude Oil at Cushing, Oklahoma for the periods indicated and the prices at period end:
Spot Price Per Barrel
Low
High
At Period End
38.24
56.96
45.09
91.16
105.34
61.43
107.26
We believe volatility in commodity prices will continue, and our ability to adjust to and manage this volatility may impact our financial results.
Water Solutions
Our water solutions segment generates revenues from the treatment and disposal of wastewater generated from crude oil and natural gas production, from the sale of recycled water and recovered hydrocarbons, and from the disposal of solids such as tank bottoms and drilling fluids. Our water processing facilities are strategically located near areas of high crude oil and natural gas production. A significant factor affecting the profitability of our water solutions segment is the extent of exploration and production in the areas near our facilities, which is generally based upon producers expectations about the profitability of drilling new wells. The primary customers of our Wyoming facility have committed to deliver a specified minimum volume of water to our facility under long-term contracts. The primary customers of our Colorado facilities have committed to deliver to our facilities all wastewater produced at wells in a designated area. One customer in Texas has committed to deliver at least 50,000 barrels of wastewater per day to our facilities. Most customers of our other facilities are not under volume commitments, although certain of our facilities are connected to producer locations by pipeline.
Our liquids segment purchases propane, butane, and other products from refiners, processing plants, producers, and other parties, and sells the products to retailers, wholesalers, refiners, and petrochemical plants. Our liquids segment owns 19 terminals and a salt dome storage facility, operates a fleet of leased railcars, and leases underground storage capacity. We attempt to reduce our exposure to price fluctuations by using back-to-back contracts and pre-sale agreements that allow us to lock in a margin on a percentage of our winter volumes. We also enter into financially settled derivative contracts as economic hedges of our physical inventory, physical sales and physical purchase contracts.
Our wholesale liquids business is a cost-plus business that can be affected by both price fluctuations and volume variations. We establish our selling price based on a pass-through of our product supply, transportation, handling, storage, and capital costs plus an acceptable margin. The margin we realize in our wholesale liquids business is substantially less on a per gallon basis than the margin we realize in our retail propane business.
Weather conditions and gasoline blending can have a significant impact on the demand for propane and butane, and sales volumes and prices are typically higher during the colder months of the year. Consequently, our revenues, operating profits, and operating cash flows are typically lower in the first and second quarters of each fiscal year.
54
The following table summarizes the range of low and high spot propane prices per gallon at Conway, Kansas, and Mt. Belvieu, Texas, two of our main pricing hubs, for the periods indicated and the prices at period end:
Conway, Kansas
Mt. Belvieu, Texas
Spot Price Per Gallon
0.30
0.46
0.35
0.48
0.47
1.00
1.10
1.03
0.99
1.11
1.04
0.28
0.51
0.32
0.57
0.96
1.13
The following table summarizes the range of low and high spot butane prices per gallon at Mt. Belvieu, Texas for the periods indicated and the prices at period end:
0.63
1.21
1.30
1.22
0.68
1.20
Retail Propane
Our retail propane segment is a cost-plus business that sells propane, distillates, and equipment and supplies to end users consisting of residential, agricultural, commercial, and industrial customers. Our retail propane segment purchases the majority of its propane from our liquids segment. Our retail propane segment generates margins based on the difference between the wholesale cost of product and the selling price of the product in the retail markets. These margins fluctuate over time due to supply and demand conditions. Weather conditions can have a significant impact on our sales volumes and prices, as a large portion of our sales are to residential customers who purchase propane and distillates for home heating purposes.
A significant factor affecting the profitability of our retail propane segment is our ability to maintain our product margin. Product margin is the difference between our sales prices and our total product costs, including transportation and storage. We monitor wholesale propane prices daily and adjust our retail prices accordingly. We believe volatility in commodity prices will continue, and our ability to adjust to and manage this volatility may impact our financial results.
The retail propane business is both weather-sensitive and subject to seasonal volume variations due to propanes primary use as a heating source in residential and commercial buildings and for agricultural purposes. Consequently, our revenues, operating profits, and operating cash flows are typically lower in the first and second quarters of each fiscal year.
Refined Products and Renewables
Our refined products and renewables segment conducts gasoline, diesel, ethanol, and biodiesel marketing operations. We purchase refined petroleum products primarily in the Gulf Coast, Southeast, and Midwest regions of the United States and schedule them for delivery primarily on the Colonial, Plantation, and Magellan pipelines. We sell our products to commercial and industrial end users, independent retailers, distributors, marketers, government entities, and other wholesalers of refined petroleum products. We sell our products at TLPs terminals and at terminals owned by third parties.
55
The following table summarizes the range of low and high spot gasoline prices per barrel using NYMEX gasoline prompt-month futures for the periods indicated and the prices at period end:
54.78
85.89
58.35
105.84
127.68
108.78
90.15
131.46
The following table summarizes the range of low and high spot diesel prices per barrel using NYMEX ULSD prompt-month futures for the periods indicated and the prices at period end:
58.00
77.28
63.53
111.30
125.16
84.68
128.10
Acquisitions
As described below, we completed numerous acquisitions during the year ended March 31, 2015 and the six months ended September 30, 2015. These acquisitions impact the comparability of our results of operations between our current and prior fiscal years.
· In August 2015, we acquired four saltwater disposal facilities and a 50% interest in an additional saltwater disposal facility in the Delaware Basin of the Permian Basin in Texas.
· We are party to certain development agreements that provide us a right to purchase water solutions facilities developed by the other party to the agreements. During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we purchased eight water treatment and disposal facilities under these development agreements.
· During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we acquired four retail propane businesses.
· In February 2015, we acquired Sawtooth NGL Caverns, LLC (Sawtooth), which owns a natural gas liquids salt dome storage facility in Utah with rail and truck access to western United States markets and entered into a construction agreement to expand the storage capacity of the facility.
56
· In November 2014, we acquired two saltwater disposal facilities in the Bakken shale play in North Dakota.
· In July 2014, we acquired TransMontaigne Inc. (TransMontaigne). As part of this transaction, we also purchased inventory from the previous owner of TransMontaigne. The operations of TransMontaigne include the marketing of refined products. As part of this transaction, we acquired the 2.0% general partner interest, the incentive distribution rights, a 19.7% limited partner interest in TLP, and assumed certain terminaling service agreements with TLP from an affiliate of the previous owner of TransMontaigne.
· We are party to certain development agreements that provide us a right to purchase water solutions facilities developed by the other party to the agreements. During the year ended March 31, 2015, we purchased 16 water treatment and disposal facilities under these development agreements.
· During the year ended March 31, 2015, we acquired eight retail propane businesses.
Summary Discussion of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we generated operating income of $0.2 million, compared to operating income of $7.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014.
Our crude oil logistics segment generated an operating loss of $0.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to operating income of less than $0.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. Per-barrel product margins were lower during the three months ended September 30, 2015 than during the three months ended September 30, 2014, due primarily to lower crude oil prices, which resulted in increased market pressure. This was partially offset by an increase in service revenues, which benefitted from the fact that crude oil markets were in contango during the three months ended September 30, 2015 (a condition in which forward crude prices are greater than spot prices), which enabled us to better utilize our storage assets. The decrease in operating income was also partially offset by $3.4 million of expense recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2014 related to certain employee retention and severance costs associated with the Gavilon, LLC (Gavilon Energy) and TransMontaigne acquisitions.
Our water solutions segment generated operating income of $0.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to operating income of $14.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. The acquisition and development of new facilities contributed to operating income during the three months ended September 30, 2015, although this impact was offset by a decrease in revenues from the sale of recovered hydrocarbons resulting from the decrease in crude oil prices.
Our liquids segment generated operating income of $20.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to operating income of $10.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. Product margins for butane and other products were $12.1 million higher during the three months ended September 30, 2015 than during the three months ended September 30, 2014. In addition, Sawtooth, which we acquired in February 2015, generated $3.4 million of operating income during the three months ended September 30, 2015. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $4.7 million in product margins for sales of propane.
Our retail propane segment generated an operating loss of $1.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to an operating loss of $3.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. Due to the seasonal nature of demand for propane, sales volumes of our retail propane segment typically are lower during the first and second quarters of the fiscal year than during the third and fourth quarters of the fiscal year. The primary reason for the decrease in the operating loss during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 was increased margins on propane sales.
Our refined products and renewables segment generated an operating loss of $5.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to operating income of $8.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. A significant portion of our refined product purchases and sales are priced based on a Gulf Coast index plus a specified differential. We use futures contracts with New York Harbor pricing to hedge the risk of price changes on our inventory valuation. Changes in the spreads between Gulf Coast and New York Harbor prices can impact the effectiveness of these futures contracts as hedges. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, Gulf Coast prices declined more than New York Harbor prices, and as a result, the futures contracts were less effective as hedges of our inventory valuation, which had an unfavorable impact on our product margins. We generally expect the spreads between the Gulf Coast and New York Harbor prices to be more consistent over the course of a year than during any individual quarter within the year. The tenor of these futures contracts, which are typically six months to one year in duration at inception, can also contribute to volatility in earnings among individual quarters within a fiscal year.
57
We recorded earnings from our equity method investments of $2.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $3.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease of $2.0 million in earnings from our investments in Glass Mountain Pipeline, LLC (Glass Mountain) and an ethanol production facility, partially offset by an increase of $1.1 million in earnings from our investments in Battleground Oil Specialty Terminal Company LLC (BOSTCO) and Frontera Brownsville LLC (Frontera).
We incurred interest expense of $31.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $28.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was due primarily to borrowings to finance acquisitions and capital expenditures.
Consolidated Results of Operations
The following table summarizes our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods indicated:
Total cost of sales
Operating expenses
General and administrative expenses
Operating income (loss)
Loss before income taxes
Income tax benefit
Less: Net income allocated to general partner
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net loss allocated to limited partners
See the detailed discussion of revenues, cost of sales, operating expenses, general and administrative expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense by segment below. The acquisitions described above under Acquisitions impact the comparability of our results of operations between our current and prior fiscal years.
58
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to financial results reported in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), we have provided the non-GAAP financial measures of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to be a substitute for those reported in accordance with GAAP. These measures may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other entities, even when similar terms are used to identify such measures.
We define EBITDA as net income (loss) attributable to parent equity, plus interest expense, income tax provision (benefit), and depreciation and amortization expense. We define Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA excluding net unrealized gains and losses on derivatives, lower of cost or market adjustments, gains and losses on disposal or impairment of assets, and equity-based compensation expense. We also include in Adjusted EBITDA certain inventory valuation adjustments related to our refined products and renewables segment, as described below. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered alternatives to net income, income before income taxes, cash flows from operating activities, or any other measure of financial performance calculated in accordance with GAAP as those items are used to measure operating performance, liquidity or the ability to service debt obligations. We believe that EBITDA provides additional information to investors for evaluating our ability to make quarterly distributions to our unitholders and is presented solely as a supplemental measure. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides additional information to investors for evaluating our financial performance without regard to our financing methods, capital structure and historical cost basis. Further, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, as we define them, may not be comparable to EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA, or similarly titled measures used by other entities.
Other than for our refined products and renewables segment, for purposes of our Adjusted EBITDA calculation, we make a distinction between realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivatives. During the period when a derivative contract is open, we record changes in the fair value of the derivative as an unrealized gain or loss. When a derivative contract matures or is settled, we reverse the previously recorded unrealized gain or loss and record a realized gain or loss. We do not draw such a distinction between realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivatives of our refined products and renewables segment. The primary hedging strategy of our refined products and renewables segment is to hedge against the risk of declines in the value of inventory over the course of the contract cycle, and many of the hedges are six months to one year in duration at inception. The inventory valuation adjustment row in the table below reflects the excess of the market value of the inventory of our refined products and renewables segment at the balance sheet date over its cost. We add this to Adjusted EBITDA because the gains and losses associated with derivative contracts of this segment, which are intended primarily to hedge inventory holding risk, also impact Adjusted EBITDA.
The following table reconciles net loss to our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA (each as hereinafter defined), which are non-GAAP financial measures:
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
27,929
58,168
48,446
(2,805
(1,933
(2,284
(898
53,299
48,366
107,467
92,716
EBITDA
52,971
55,138
93,907
81,065
Net unrealized gains on derivatives
(6,286
(13,700
(2,746
(8,690
Inventory valuation adjustment
9,197
19,355
Lower of cost or market adjustments
414
2,837
(5,926
4,150
1,713
4,608
Equity-based compensation expense (1)
9,448
49,680
Adjusted EBITDA
67,038
62,170
155,983
101,479
(1) The equity-based compensation expense in the table above may differ from the equity-based compensation expense reported in Note 11 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q (Quarterly Report). Amounts reported in the table above include expense accruals for bonuses expected to be paid in common units, whereas the amounts reported in Note 11 to our condensed consolidated financial statements only include expenses associated with equity-based awards that have been formally granted.
The following tables reconcile depreciation and amortization amounts per the EBITDA table above to depreciation and amortization amounts reported in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the periods indicated:
Reconciliation to condensed consolidated statements of operations:
Depreciation and amortization per EBITDA table
Intangible asset amortization recorded to cost of sales
(1,700
(1,984
(3,401
(4,121
Depreciation and amortization of unconsolidated entities
(5,091
(5,734
(10,125
(8,615
Depreciation and amortization attributable to noncontrolling interests
10,253
9,451
22,651
9,494
Depreciation and amortization per condensed consolidated statements of operations
Reconciliation to condensed consolidated statements of cash flows:
Amortization of debt issuance costs recorded to interest expense
Depreciation and amortization per condensed consolidated statements of cash flows
The following table reconciles interest expense per the EBITDA table above to interest expense reported in our condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods indicated:
Interest expense per EBITDA table
Interest expense attributable to noncontrolling interests
1,781
622
3,337
Gain on extinguishment of debt of unconsolidated entities
693
270
175
77
Interest expense per condensed consolidated statements of operations
31,571
28,651
62,373
49,145
60
The following table summarizes expansion and maintenance capital expenditures for the periods indicated. This information has been prepared on the accrual basis, and excludes property, plant and equipment acquired in acquisitions.
Capital Expenditures
Expansion (1)
Maintenance (2)
87,419
15,452
102,871
23,270
10,714
33,984
200,532
26,006
226,538
65,675
17,176
82,851
(1) Includes expansion capital expenditures for TLP of $3.9 million and $1.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $9.3 million and $1.0 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(2) Includes maintenance capital expenditures for TLP of $4.2 million and $0.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $7.1 million and $0.1 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
The following tables reconcile Adjusted EBITDA to operating income for each of our reportable segments for the periods indicated:
Products
and
Corporate
and Other
Amortization recorded to cost of sales
261
1,376
Net unrealized (gains) losses on derivatives
1,484
(4,166
(3,331
(273
Equity-based compensation expense
9,444
9,467
1,080
64
80
474
(284
(94
2,336
(1,812
479
228
3,013
2,492
319
2,280
5,091
Adjusted EBITDA attributable to noncontrolling interests
(639
(173
(14,418
(15,230
13,773
18,388
20,159
6,896
7,124
698
61
495
1,353
(664
(12,746
(124
(166
2,621
216
204
3,861
259
1,918
(66
1,845
(1,306
340
(140
380
2,420
5,734
(89
(13,451
(13,513
14,581
23,658
14,795
5,082
13,433
(9,379
125
522
2,754
714
(2,458
(740
(262
585
49,556
50,141
(1,211
(4,715
1,000
710
(191
2,327
(159
8,970
(5,760
783
209
626
255
4,667
4,965
620
4,540
10,125
(1,824
(32,169
(34,118
34,100
38,238
27,448
15,343
52,758
(11,904
988
1,614
1,635
(3,060
(6,571
1,140
(199
195
4,347
(139
300
(138
3,033
3,203
(2,107
927
(52
197
5,179
3,208
8,615
(213
92
(13,572
26,217
46,384
18,816
11,727
14,851
(16,516
Segment Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
Items Impacting the Comparability of Our Financial Results
Our current and future results of operations may not be comparable to our historical results of operations for the periods presented, due to business combinations. We have expanded our water solutions business considerably through numerous acquisitions of water treatment and disposal facilities. We expanded our liquids business through the February 2015 acquisition of Sawtooth. We expanded our retail propane business through numerous acquisitions of retail propane businesses. The results of operations of our liquids and retail propane businesses are impacted by seasonality, due primarily to the increase in volumes sold during the peak heating season from October through March. In addition, product price fluctuations can have a significant impact on our sales volumes and revenues. For these and other reasons, our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for future periods or for the full fiscal year ending March 31, 2016.
Volumes
The following table summarizes the volume of product sold and water received for the periods indicated. Volumes shown in the following table include intersegment sales.
Crude oil sold (barrels)
21,404
21,549
(145
Water received (barrels)
54,719
38,251
16,468
Propane sold (gallons)
243,663
240,234
3,429
Other products sold (gallons)
232,227
197,510
34,717
23,095
23,551
(456
Distillates sold (gallons)
3,550
3,434
Refined products sold (barrels)
24,148
21,194
2,954
Renewable products sold (barrels)
1,308
1,228
Revenues and Cost of Sales by Segment
The following table summarizes our revenues and cost of sales by segment for the periods indicated:
Cost of
Revenues
Sales
Margin
1,009,852
984,993
24,859
2,121,199
2,093,744
27,455
56,061
62,158
269,728
231,851
37,877
553,872
528,213
25,659
32,327
28,464
1,826,187
1,789,943
36,244
56,369
Eliminations
(13,273
(24,181
187,369
201,061
Operating Income (Loss) by Segment
The following table summarizes our operating income (loss) by segment for the periods indicated:
(113
(14,587
9,441
1,297
(14,066
10,504
Operating income
(7,524
The following table summarizes the operating results of our crude oil logistics segment for the periods indicated:
2014 (1)
Revenues:
(1,112,512
1,165
Total revenues (2)
(1,111,347
Expenses:
(1,108,751
12,851
12,432
419
2,030
5,745
(3,715
Depreciation and amortization expense
813
Total expenses
1,009,927
2,121,161
(1,111,234
Segment operating income (loss)
(2) Revenues include $2.3 million and $10.1 million of intersegment sales during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, that are eliminated in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Revenues. Our crude oil logistics segment generated $997.1 million of revenue from crude oil sales during the three months ended September 30, 2015, selling 21.4 million barrels at an average price of $46.59 per barrel. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, our crude oil logistics segment generated $2.1 billion of revenue from crude oil sales, selling 21.5 million barrels at an average price of $97.90 per barrel. The decrease in revenue per barrel was due primarily to the sharp decline in crude oil prices after September 30, 2014.
Crude oil transportation and other revenues were $12.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $11.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase is due primarily to crude oil markets being in contango during the three months ended September 30, 2015 (a condition in which forward crude prices are greater than spot prices), which allowed us to generate revenue from leasing our owned storage and subleasing our leased storage.
Cost of Sales. Our cost of crude oil sold was $985.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 21.4 million barrels at an average cost of $46.02 per barrel. Our cost of sales during the three months ended September 30, 2015 was increased by $1.5 million of net unrealized losses on derivatives. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, our cost of crude oil sold was $2.1 billion, as we sold 21.5 million barrels at an average cost of $97.16 per barrel. Our cost of sales during the
65
three months ended September 30, 2014 was reduced by $0.7 million of net unrealized gains on derivatives. The following table summarizes our product margins for crude oil sales (in thousands, except per barrel amounts) for the periods indicated:
Crude oil sales revenues
Crude oil cost of sales
(984,993
(2,093,744
Crude oil product margin
12,113
15,874
Product margin per barrel
0.74
Per-barrel product margins were lower during the three months ended September 30, 2015 than during the three months ended September 30, 2014 due primarily to lower crude oil prices, which resulted in increased market pressure.
Operating Expenses. Our crude oil logistics segment incurred operating expenses of $12.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $12.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. This increase was due primarily to higher repair and maintenance expense due to the timing of repairs and to losses on asset retirements, partially offset by lower incentive compensation expense, as incentive compensation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2015 is reported within corporate and other, rather than within the crude oil logistics segment, since we expect to pay these bonuses in common units.
General and Administrative Expenses. Our crude oil logistics segment incurred general and administrative expenses of $2.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $5.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. General and administrative expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2014 included $2.2 million of compensation expense related to bonuses that the previous owners of Gavilon Energy granted to employees, contingent upon successful completion of the sale of the business. These bonuses were paid in December 2014. General and administrative expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2014 were also increased by $1.2 million of compensation expense related to termination benefits for certain TransMontaigne employees.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our crude oil logistics segment incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $10.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $9.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014.
66
The following table summarizes the operating results of our water solutions segment for the periods indicated:
10,965
(12,588
(5,147
(5,225
Cost of salesderivative gain (1)
(12,373
3,806
Cost of salesother
2,934
(2,934
32,755
29,019
3,736
685
774
4,843
47,289
37,927
9,362
Segment operating income
(1) Includes realized and unrealized (gains) losses.
The following tables summarize activity separated among the following categories:
· facilities we owned before June 30, 2014, which we refer to below as existing facilities;
· facilities we developed after June 30, 2014, which we refer to below as recently developed facilities; and
· facilities we acquired after June 30, 2014, which we refer to below as recently acquired facilities.
Service Fee Revenues. The following table summarizes our service fee revenues (in thousands, except per barrel amounts) for the periods indicated:
Fees Per
Service
Barrels
Water Barrel
Fees
Processed
Existing facilities
31,891
0.71
Recently developed facilities
4,440
7,561
0.59
Recently acquired facilities
8,112
15,267
0.53
0.64
The decrease in the volume processed at our existing facilities during the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2014 was due primarily to a slowdown in customer production as a result of the lower crude oil prices, and was also due in part to migration of volumes from existing facilities to recently developed and recently acquired facilities due to the location of the facilities.
67
Recovered Hydrocarbon Revenues. The following table summarizes our recovered hydrocarbon revenues (in thousands, except per barrel amounts) for the periods indicated:
Recovered
Revenue Per
Hydrocarbon
Revenue
6,526
0.20
0.61
1,415
0.19
2,805
0.18
The decrease in revenue per barrel associated with recovered hydrocarbons was due primarily to the sharp decline in crude oil prices after September 30, 2014 and a decrease in the volume of hydrocarbons recovered per barrel of water processed.
Our water solutions segment generated $5.1 million of water transportation revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2014. These revenues related to our water transportation business, which we sold during September 2014.
Cost of Sales. We enter into derivatives in our water solutions segment to protect against the risk of a decline in the market price of the hydrocarbons we expect to recover when processing the wastewater. Our cost of sales during the three months ended September 30, 2015 was reduced by $4.2 million of net unrealized gains on derivatives and $4.4 million of net realized gains on derivatives. Our cost of sales during the three months ended September 30, 2014 was reduced by $12.7 million of net unrealized gains on derivatives and increased by $0.3 million of net realized losses on derivatives.
Our other cost of sales was $2.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. These costs related primarily to our water transportation business, which we sold during September 2014.
Operating Expenses. The following table summarizes our operating expenses for the periods indicated:
21,813
(7,206
2,765
8,177
The decrease in operating expenses for existing facilities was due primarily to a loss of $4.0 million related to the sale of our water transportation business during September 2014, and to lower operating costs of water disposal wells at existing facilities due to lower volumes processed.
General and Administrative Expenses. Our water solutions segment incurred general and administrative expenses of $0.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $0.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our water solutions segment incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $22.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $17.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. Of this increase, $3.0 million related to recently acquired facilities and $0.7 million related to recently developed facilities.
The following table summarizes the operating results of our liquids segment for the periods indicated:
(142,163
(145,824
3,843
(284,144
Cost of salespropane
95,903
233,390
(137,487
Cost of salesother products
132,179
290,119
(157,940
3,769
4,704
(935
12,330
9,183
3,147
2,163
269
249,358
542,943
(293,585
(1) During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we made certain changes in the way we attribute revenues and railcar cost of sales to the categories shown in the table above. These changes did not impact total revenues or total cost of sales. We have retrospectively adjusted previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.
(2) Revenues include $10.8 million and $14.1 million of intersegment sales during the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, that are eliminated in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Revenues. Our liquids segment generated $98.8 million of wholesale propane sales revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2015, selling 243.7 million gallons at an average price of $0.41 per gallon. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, our liquids segment generated $240.9 million of wholesale propane sales revenue, selling 240.2 million gallons at an average price of $1.00 per gallon.
Our liquids segment generated $160.8 million of other wholesale products sales revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2015, selling 232.2 million gallons at an average price of $0.69 per gallon. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, our liquids segment generated $306.7 million of other wholesale products sales revenue, selling 197.5 million gallons at an average price of $1.55 per gallon. The increase in the volume of other wholesale products sold was due to expanded operations.
Our liquids segment generated $10.1 million of other revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $6.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. This revenue includes storage income and income generated from the operation of a terminal for a customer. This increase was due primarily to $5.2 million of revenue related to Sawtooth, which we acquired in February 2015.
69
Cost of Sales. Our cost of wholesale propane sales was $95.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 243.7 million gallons at an average cost of $0.39 per gallon. Our cost of wholesale propane sales during the three months ended September 30, 2015 was reduced by less than $0.1 million of net unrealized gains on derivatives. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, our cost of wholesale propane sales was $233.4 million, as we sold 240.2 million gallons at an average cost of $0.97 per gallon. Our cost of wholesale propane sales during the three months ended September 30, 2014 was increased by $1.9 million of net unrealized losses on derivatives. The following table summarizes our product margins for propane sales (in thousands, except per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
Propane revenues
Propane cost of sales
(95,903
(233,390
Propane product margin
2,867
7,543
Product margin per gallon
0.012
0.031
Propane prices declined during the three months ended September 30, 2015, which had an adverse impact on product margins.
Our cost of sales of other products was $132.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 232.2 million gallons at an average cost of $0.57 per gallon. Our cost of sales of other products during the three months ended September 30, 2015 was reduced by $3.3 million of net unrealized gains on derivatives. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, our cost of sales of other products was $290.1 million, as we sold 197.5 million gallons at an average cost of $1.47 per gallon. Our cost of sales of other products during the three months ended September 30, 2014 was reduced by $2.2 million of net unrealized gains on derivatives. The following table summarizes our per gallon product margins (in thousands, except per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
Other products revenues
Other products cost of sales
(132,179
(290,119
Other products product margin
28,657
16,541
0.123
0.084
Product margins during the three months ended September 30, 2015 benefitted from a high level of butane supply in the market, which lowered our product cost.
Operating Expenses. Our liquids segment incurred operating expenses of $12.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $9.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in operating expenses was due primarily to $1.1 million of expenses related to Sawtooth, which we acquired in February 2015, and to increased compensation expense.
General and Administrative Expenses. Our liquids segment incurred general and administrative expenses of $2.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $2.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our liquids segment incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $2.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $3.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014.
70
The following table summarizes the operating results of our retail propane segment for the periods indicated:
(12,433
(3,852
1,133
(15,152
11,921
27,434
(15,513
Cost of salesdistillates
5,783
9,840
(4,057
3,175
2,620
555
22,485
21,205
1,280
2,698
2,637
1,225
54,971
71,420
(16,449
Segment operating loss
Revenues. Our retail propane segment generated revenue of $36.1 million from propane sales during the three months ended September 30, 2015, selling 23.1 million gallons at an average price of $1.56 per gallon. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, our retail propane segment generated $48.6 million of revenue from propane sales, selling 23.6 million gallons at an average price of $2.06 per gallon.
Our retail propane segment generated revenue of $7.7 million from distillate sales during the three months ended September 30, 2015, selling 3.6 million gallons at an average price of $2.16 per gallon. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, our retail propane segment generated $11.5 million of revenue from distillate sales, selling 3.4 million gallons at an average price of $3.36 per gallon.
Cost of Sales. Our cost of retail propane sales was $11.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 23.1 million gallons at an average cost of $0.52 per gallon. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, our cost of retail propane sales was $27.4 million, as we sold 23.6 million gallons at an average cost of $1.16 per gallon. The following table summarizes our product margins for retail propane sales (in thousands, except per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
(11,921
(27,434
24,198
21,118
1.05
0.90
Our cost of distillate sales was $5.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 3.6 million gallons at an average cost of $1.63 per gallon. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, our cost of distillate sales was $9.8 million, as we sold 3.4 million gallons at an average cost of $2.87 per gallon. The following table summarizes our product margins for distillate sales (in thousands, except per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
Distillate revenues
Distillate cost of sales
(5,783
(9,840
Distillate product margin
1,895
1,690
Distillate sold (gallons)
0.49
Operating Expenses. Our retail propane segment incurred operating expenses of $22.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $21.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in operating expenses was due primarily to increased employee compensation expense in support of the growth of our business.
General and Administrative Expenses. Our retail propane segment incurred general and administrative expenses of $2.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $2.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our retail propane segment incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $8.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $7.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014.
The following table summarizes the operating results of our refined products and renewables segment for the periods indicated:
Refined products sales (2)
(762,130
(23,636
4,733
(781,033
Cost of salesrefined products
1,696,664
2,436,468
(739,804
Cost of salesrenewables
93,279
114,383
(21,104
25,538
29,838
(4,300
4,798
5,792
(994
(765
1,831,431
2,598,398
(766,967
(1) During the three months ended September 30, 2015, we made certain changes in the way we attribute revenues and cost of sales to the categories shown in the table above. These changes did not impact total revenues or total cost of sales. We have retrospectively adjusted previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.
(2) Revenues include $0.3 million of intersegment sales during the three months ended September 30, 2015 that are eliminated in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
72
Revenues. Our refined products sales revenue was $1.7 billion during the three months ended September 30, 2015, selling 24.1 million barrels at an average price of $70.58 per barrel. Our refined products sales revenue was $2.5 billion during the three months ended September 30, 2014, selling 21.2 million barrels at an average price of $116.37 per barrel. The increase in revenues resulting from higher sales volumes was offset by a sharp decline in product prices. The increase in volumes was due primarily to the purchase of certain pipeline capacity allocations from other shippers during the second half of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.
Our renewables sales revenue was $93.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, selling 1.3 million barrels at an average price of $71.25 per barrel. Our renewables sales revenue was $116.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014, selling 1.2 million barrels at an average price of $95.13 per barrel.
Our refined products and renewables segment generated $28.7 million of service fee revenue during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $24.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in service fee revenue was due primarily to the fact that one of TLPs terminal facilities was temporarily out of service during the three months ended September 30, 2014, the contracting of additional available capacity to a third party for a three-year term beginning in May 2015, and the transfer of a contract obligation from NGL to a third party during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.
Cost of Sales. Our cost of refined products sales was $1.7 billion during the three months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 24.1 million barrels at an average cost of $70.26 per barrel. Our cost of refined products sales was $2.4 billion during the three months ended September 30, 2014, as we sold 21.2 million barrels at an average cost of $114.96 per barrel. The following table summarizes our refined product margins (in thousands, except per barrel and per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
Refined products revenues
Refined products cost of sales
(1,696,664
(2,436,468
Refined products product margin
7,595
29,921
0.315
1.412
0.007
0.034
A significant portion of our refined product purchases and sales are priced based on a Gulf Coast index plus a specified differential. We use futures contracts with New York Harbor pricing to hedge the risk of price changes on our inventory valuation. Changes in the spreads between Gulf Coast and New York Harbor prices can impact the effectiveness of these futures contracts as hedges. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, Gulf Coast prices declined more than New York Harbor prices, and as a result, the futures contracts were less effective as hedges of our inventory valuation, which had an unfavorable impact on our product margins. We generally expect the spreads between the Gulf Coast and New York Harbor prices to be more consistent over the course of a year than during any individual quarter within the year. The tenor of these futures contracts, which are typically six months to one year in duration at inception, can also contribute to volatility in earnings among individual quarters within a fiscal year.
Our cost of renewables sales was $93.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 1.3 million barrels at an average cost of $71.31 per barrel. Our cost of renewables sales was $114.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014, as we sold 1.2 million barrels at an average cost of $93.15 per barrel. The following table summarizes our renewables product margins (in thousands, except per barrel and per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
Renewables revenues
Renewables cost of sales
(93,279
(114,383
Renewables product margin (loss)
(90
2,442
Product margin (loss) per barrel
(0.069
1.989
Product margin (loss) per gallon
(0.002
0.047
73
Per-barrel product margins were lower during the three months ended September 30, 2015 than during the three months ended September 30, 2014 due primarily to lower renewables prices caused by increased import activity.
Operating Expenses. Our refined products and renewables segment incurred operating expenses of $25.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $29.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. This decrease was due primarily to lower compensation expense related to post-acquisition synergies.
General and Administrative Expenses. Our refined products and renewables segment incurred general and administrative expenses of $4.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $5.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. General and administrative expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2014 were increased by $1.5 million of compensation expense related to termination benefits for certain TransMontaigne employees.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our refined products and renewables segment incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $11.2 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $11.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014.
Corporate and Other
The operating loss within corporate and other includes the following components for the periods indicated:
Incentive compensation expense
(4,278
(13,817
9,539
Acquisition expenses
(566
(3,230
2,664
Other corporate expenses
(8,401
(6,702
(1,699
The expenses shown in the table above for incentive compensation include cash-based and equity-based compensation. Such incentive compensation expenses were lower during the three months ended September 30, 2015 than during the three months ended September 30, 2014, due primarily to lower expenses associated with discretionary employee bonuses.
The expenses shown in the table above for acquisitions relate primarily to legal and advisory costs. We incurred $3.0 million of such expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2014 related to our acquisition of TransMontaigne.
The increase in other corporate expenses was due to the continued growth of our business.
Segment Operating Results for the Six Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014
Our current and future results of operations may not be comparable to our historical results of operations for the periods presented, due to business combinations. We have expanded our water solutions business considerably through numerous acquisitions of water treatment and disposal facilities. We expanded our liquids business through the February 2015 acquisition of Sawtooth. We expanded our retail propane business through numerous acquisitions of retail propane businesses. Our refined products and renewables businesses were significantly expanded with our July 2014 acquisition of TransMontaigne. The results of operations of our liquids and retail propane businesses are impacted by seasonality, due primarily to the increase in volumes sold during the peak heating season from October through March. In addition, product price fluctuations can have a significant impact on our sales volumes and revenues. For these and other reasons, our results of operations for the six months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for future periods or for the full fiscal year ending March 31, 2016.
45,087
40,806
4,281
109,195
65,689
43,506
471,615
423,992
47,623
424,214
384,235
39,979
47,502
47,142
360
8,643
8,712
45,075
29,094
15,981
2,683
2,490
2,341,584
2,280,933
60,651
4,060,257
4,001,158
59,099
106,747
98,899
532,229
477,643
54,586
1,070,393
1,031,563
38,830
67,210
58,842
3,669,362
3,555,256
114,106
59,553
423
(30,938
(13
(75,290
403,287
315,622
10,384
(16,752
9,883
2,183
20,209
(27,605
Operating loss
(1,698
(1,728,784
10,111
(1,718,673
(1,720,225
24,601
28,417
(3,816
4,110
10,210
(6,100
1,084
2,329,699
4,058,756
(1,729,057
(1) During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we made certain changes in the way we attribute revenues to the categories shown in the table above. These changes did not impact total revenues. We have retrospectively adjusted previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.
(2) Revenues include $6.2 million and $19.8 million of intersegment sales during the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, that are eliminated in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Revenues. Our crude oil logistics segment generated $2.3 billion of revenue from crude oil sales during the six months ended September 30, 2015, selling 45.1 million barrels at an average price of $51.23 per barrel. During the six months ended September 30, 2014, our crude oil logistics segment generated $4.0 billion of revenue from crude oil sales, selling 40.8 million barrels at an average price of $98.97 per barrel. The decrease in revenue per barrel was due primarily to the sharp decline in crude oil prices after September 30, 2014. The increase in our sales volumes was due to expanded operations.
Crude oil transportation and other revenues were $31.7 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $21.6 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. The increase is due primarily to crude oil markets being in contango during the six months ended September 30, 2015 (a condition in which forward crude prices are greater than spot prices), which allowed us to generate revenue from leasing our owned storage and subleasing our leased storage.
76
Cost of Sales. Our cost of crude oil sold was $2.3 billion during the six months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 45.1 million barrels at an average cost of $50.59 per barrel. Our cost of sales during the six months ended September 30, 2015 was increased by $0.7 million of net unrealized losses on derivatives. During the six months ended September 30, 2014, our cost of crude oil sold was $4.0 billion, as we sold 40.8 million barrels at an average cost of $98.05 per barrel. Our cost of sales during the six months ended September 30, 2014 was reduced by $3.1 million of net unrealized gains on derivatives. The following table summarizes our product margins for crude oil sales (in thousands, except per barrel amounts) for the periods indicated:
(2,280,933
(4,001,158
28,956
37,515
0.92
Per-barrel product margins were lower during the six months ended September 30, 2015 than during the six months ended September 30, 2014 due primarily to lower crude oil prices, which resulted in increased market pressure.
Operating Expenses. Our crude oil logistics segment incurred operating expenses of $24.6 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $28.4 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. This decrease was due primarily to lower incentive compensation expense, as incentive compensation expense for the six months ended September 30, 2015 is reported within corporate and other, rather than within the crude oil logistics segment, since we expect to pay these bonuses in common units.
General and Administrative Expenses. Our crude oil logistics segment incurred general and administrative expenses of $4.1 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $10.2 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. General and administrative expenses during the six months ended September 30, 2014 included $4.3 million of compensation expense related to bonuses that the previous owners of Gavilon Energy granted to employees, contingent upon successful completion of the sale of the business. These bonuses were paid in December 2014. General and administrative expenses during the six months ended September 30, 2014 were also increased by $1.2 million of compensation expense related to termination benefits for certain TransMontaigne employees.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our crude oil logistics segment incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $20.1 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $19.0 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014.
30,002
(20,785
(10,745
1,754
(5,070
6,204
(6,204
64,949
48,748
16,201
1,403
1,601
(198
8,597
104,654
86,148
18,506
· facilities we owned before March 31, 2014, which we refer to below as existing facilities;
· facilities we developed after March 31, 2014, which we refer to below as recently developed facilities; and
· facilities we acquired after March 31, 2014, which we refer to below as recently acquired facilities.
39,686
50,669
0.78
37,376
58,639
7,898
13,466
24,357
45,060
0.54
4,563
7,050
0.65
0.66
The decrease in the volume processed at our existing facilities during the six months ended September 30, 2015 compared to the six months ended September 30, 2014 was due primarily to a slowdown in customer production as a result of the lower crude oil prices, and was also due in part to migration of volumes from existing facilities to recently developed and recently acquired facilities due to the location of the facilities.
78
15,207
44,831
0.76
3,459
0.26
2,518
0.36
0.24
0.72
Our water solutions segment generated $10.7 million of water transportation revenue during the six months ended September 30, 2014. These revenues related to our water transportation business, which we sold during September 2014.
Cost of Sales. We enter into derivatives in our water solutions segment to protect against the risk of a decline in the market price of the hydrocarbons we expected to recover when processing the wastewater. Our cost of sales during the six months ended September 30, 2015 was reduced by $2.5 million of net unrealized gains on derivatives and $2.5 million of net realized gains on derivatives. Our cost of sales during the six months ended September 30, 2014 was reduced by $6.6 million of net unrealized gains on derivatives and increased by $1.5 million of net realized losses on derivatives.
Our other cost of sales was $6.2 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. These costs related primarily to our water transportation business, which we sold during September 2014.
37,683
43,611
(5,928
4,925
22,341
5,137
17,204
General and Administrative Expenses. Our water solutions segment incurred general and administrative expenses of $1.4 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $1.6 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our water solutions segment incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $43.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $34.7 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. Of this increase, $7.1 million related to recently acquired facilities and $1.2 million related to recently developed facilities.
79
(259,476
(286,728
8,040
(538,164
205,273
454,638
(249,365
265,347
568,640
(303,293
7,023
8,285
(1,262
22,301
18,248
4,053
4,637
3,981
656
1,164
512,330
1,060,377
(548,047
(1) During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we made certain changes in the way we attribute revenues and railcar cost of sales to the categories shown in the table above. These changes did not impact total revenues or total cost of sales. We have retrospectively adjusted previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.
(2) Revenues include $24.3 million and $55.5 million of intersegment sales during the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, that are eliminated in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Revenues. Our liquids segment generated $204.3 million of wholesale propane sales revenue during the six months ended September 30, 2015, selling 471.6 million gallons at an average price of $0.43 per gallon. During the six months ended September 30, 2014, our liquids segment generated $463.7 million of wholesale propane sales revenue, selling 424.0 million gallons at an average price of $1.09 per gallon. The increase in the volume sold was due primarily to the expansion of an agreement under which we market the majority of the production from a fractionation facility.
Our liquids segment generated $308.3 million of other wholesale products sales revenue during the six months ended September 30, 2015, selling 424.2 million gallons at an average price of $0.73 per gallon. During the six months ended September 30, 2014, our liquids segment generated $595.1 million of other wholesale products sales revenue, selling 384.2 million gallons at an average price of $1.55 per gallon. The increase in the volume of other wholesale products sold was due to expanded operations.
Our liquids segment generated $19.6 million of other revenues during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $11.6 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. This revenue includes storage income and income generated from the operation of a terminal for a customer. This increase was due primarily to $10.0 million of revenue related to Sawtooth, which we acquired in February 2015.
Cost of Sales. Our cost of wholesale propane sales was $205.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 471.6 million gallons at an average cost of $0.44 per gallon. Our cost of wholesale propane sales during the six months ended September 30, 2015 was increased by $0.9 million of net unrealized losses on derivatives. During the six months ended September 30, 2014, our cost of wholesale propane sales was $454.6 million, as we sold 424.0 million gallons at an average cost of $1.07 per gallon. Our cost of wholesale propane sales during the six months ended September 30, 2014 was increased by $1.7 million of net unrealized losses on derivatives. The following table summarizes our product margins for propane sales (in thousands, except per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
(205,273
(454,638
Propane product margin (loss)
(1,013
9,098
0.021
Propane prices declined during the six months ended September 30, 2015, which had an adverse impact on product margins.
Our cost of sales of other products was $265.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 424.2 million gallons at an average cost of $0.63 per gallon. Our cost of sales of other products during the six months ended September 30, 2015 was reduced by $1.6 million of net unrealized gains on derivatives. During the six months ended September 30, 2014, our cost of sales of other products was $568.6 million, as we sold 384.2 million gallons at an average cost of $1.48 per gallon. Our cost of sales of other products during the six months ended September 30, 2014 was reduced by $0.8 million of net unrealized gains on derivatives. The following table summarizes our per gallon product margins (in thousands, except per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
(265,347
(568,640
43,000
26,435
0.101
0.069
Product margins during the six months ended September 30, 2015 benefitted from a high level of butane supply in the market, which lowered our product cost.
Operating Expenses. Our liquids segment incurred operating expenses of $22.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $18.2 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in operating expenses was due primarily to $2.3 million of expenses related to Sawtooth, which we acquired in February 2015, and to increased compensation expense.
General and Administrative Expenses. Our liquids segment incurred general and administrative expenses of $4.6 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $4.0 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in general and administrative expenses was due primarily to $0.7 million of expenses related to Sawtooth, which we acquired in February 2015.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our liquids segment incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $7.7 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $6.6 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was due to $2.7 million of expense during the six months ended September 30, 2015 related to Sawtooth, which we acquired in February 2015. This increase was partially offset by $0.9 million of depreciation expense we recorded during the six months ended September 30, 2014 related to a natural gas liquids terminal that we sold in December 2014.
81
(21,274
(9,600
2,267
(28,607
28,232
56,721
(28,489
15,975
25,876
(9,901
6,236
4,821
46,256
42,687
3,569
5,804
5,548
256
2,360
120,118
150,908
(30,790
Revenues. Our retail propane segment generated revenue of $79.3 million from propane sales during the six months ended September 30, 2015, selling 47.5 million gallons at an average price of $1.67 per gallon. During the six months ended September 30, 2014, our retail propane segment generated $100.6 million of revenue from propane sales, selling 47.1 million gallons at an average price of $2.13 per gallon.
Our retail propane segment generated revenue of $20.6 million from distillate sales during the six months ended September 30, 2015, selling 8.6 million gallons at an average price of $2.39 per gallon. During the six months ended September 30, 2014, our retail propane segment generated $30.2 million of revenue from distillate sales, selling 8.7 million gallons at an average price of $3.47 per gallon.
Cost of Sales. Our cost of retail propane sales was $28.2 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 47.5 million gallons at an average cost of $0.59 per gallon. During the six months ended September 30, 2014, our cost of retail propane sales was $56.7 million, as we sold 47.1 million gallons at an average cost of $1.20 per gallon. The following table summarizes our product margins for retail propane sales (in thousands, except per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
(28,232
(56,721
51,072
43,857
1.08
0.93
82
Our cost of distillate sales was $16.0 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 8.6 million gallons at an average cost of $1.85 per gallon. During the six months ended September 30, 2014, our cost of distillate sales was $25.9 million, as we sold 8.7 million gallons at an average cost of $2.97 per gallon. The following table summarizes our product margins for distillate sales (in thousands, except per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
(15,975
(25,876
4,650
4,349
Operating Expenses. Our retail propane segment incurred operating expenses of $46.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $42.7 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in operating expenses was due primarily to increased employee compensation expense in support of the growth of our business.
General and Administrative Expenses. Our retail propane segment incurred general and administrative expenses of $5.8 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $5.5 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our retail propane segment incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $17.6 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $15.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014.
The following table summarizes the operating results of our refined products and renewables segment for the periods indicated. Our refined products and renewables segment was significantly expanded with our July 2014 acquisition of TransMontaigne. The resultant increase in revenues and cost of sales was offset by a sharp decline in product prices.
(39,404
(48,757
32,806
(55,355
3,356,161
3,419,480
(63,319
199,095
245,684
(46,589
51,401
31,462
19,939
9,602
7,763
1,839
12,566
3,641,586
3,717,150
(75,564
(1) During the six months ended September 30, 2015, we made certain changes in the way we attribute revenues and cost of sales to the categories shown in the table above. These changes did not impact total revenues or total cost of sales. We have retrospectively adjusted previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.
(2) Revenues include $0.5 million of intersegment sales during the six months ended September 30, 2015 that are eliminated in our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
83
Revenues. Our refined products sales revenue was $3.4 billion during the six months ended September 30, 2015, selling 45.1 million barrels at an average price of $75.72 per barrel. Our refined products sales revenue was $3.5 billion during the six months ended September 30, 2014, selling 29.1 million barrels at an average price of $118.67 per barrel.
Our renewables sales revenue was $199.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, selling 2.7 million barrels at an average price of $74.30 per barrel. Our renewables sales revenue was $248.1 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014, selling 2.5 million barrels at an average price of $99.64 per barrel.
Our refined products and renewables segment generated $56.8 million of service fee revenues during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $24.0 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014.
Cost of Sales. Our cost of refined products sales was $3.4 billion during the six months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 45.1 million barrels at an average cost of $74.46 per barrel. Our cost of refined products sales was $3.4 billion during the six months ended September 30, 2014, as we sold 29.1 million barrels at an average cost of $117.53 per barrel. The following table summarizes our refined product margins (in thousands, except per barrel and per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
(3,356,161
(3,419,480
57,047
33,132
1.266
1.139
0.030
0.027
Per-barrel product margins were higher during the six months ended September 30, 2015 than during the six months ended September 30, 2014, due primarily to the inclusion of TransMontaigne in the full six months of the current fiscal year. Per-barrel product margins are typically higher for TransMontaignes operations than they are for the refined product operations we owned prior to the acquisition of TransMontaigne.
Our cost of renewables sales was $199.1 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, as we sold 2.7 million barrels at an average cost of $74.21 per barrel. Our cost of renewables sales was $245.7 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014, as we sold 2.5 million barrels at an average cost of $98.67 per barrel. The following table summarizes our renewables product margins (in thousands, except per barrel and per gallon amounts) for the periods indicated:
(199,095
(245,684
Renewables product margin
247
2,415
0.092
0.970
0.002
0.023
84
Per-barrel product margins were lower during the six months ended September 30, 2015 than during the six months ended September 30, 2014 due primarily to lower renewables prices caused by increased import activity.
Operating Expenses. Our refined products and renewables segment incurred operating expenses of $51.4 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $31.5 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. This increase was due primarily to the inclusion of TransMontaigne in the full six months of the current fiscal year, compared to three months of the prior fiscal year.
General and Administrative Expenses. Our refined products and renewables segment incurred general and administrative expenses of $9.6 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $7.8 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. This increase was due primarily to the inclusion of TransMontaigne in the full six months of the current fiscal year, compared to three months of the prior fiscal year. General and administrative expenses during the six months ended September 30, 2014 were increased by $1.5 million of compensation expense related to termination benefits for certain TransMontaigne employees.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Our refined products and renewables segment incurred depreciation and amortization expense of $25.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $12.8 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. This increase was due primarily to depreciation on TLPs terminal assets and amortization of customer relationship intangible assets acquired in the business combination with TransMontaigne. Of the depreciation and amortization expense, TLPs depreciation and amortization expense was $23.5 million and $10.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
(51,292
(22,210
(29,082
(631
(4,328
(16,788
(14,568
(2,220
The expenses shown in the table above for incentive compensation include cash-based and equity-based compensation. Such incentive compensation expenses were higher during the six months ended September 30, 2015 than during the six months ended September 30, 2014, due primarily to two factors described below.
As part of its review of our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved a new type of equity-based compensation award, under which the number of units that vest is contingent upon the performance of our common units relative to the performance of other entities in the Alerian MLP Index. During the six months ended September 30, 2015, three tranches of these Performance Awards were granted, with vesting dates of July 1, 2015, July 1, 2016, and July 1, 2017, respectively. We recorded $18.1 million of expense related to the Performance Awards during the six months ended September 30, 2015, $16.1 million of which related to awards that vested on July 1, 2015.
We have also granted certain Service Awards, which vest contingent only on the continued service of the recipients. The number of outstanding Service Awards was higher at September 30, 2015 than at September 30, 2014. This was due in part to the addition of new employees as our business has expanded, and was due in part to increases in the number of Service Awards granted to certain employees following the Compensation Committees review of our compensation program. The expense associated with these Service Awards (exclusive of accruals of annual bonuses paid or expected to be paid in common units) was $21.6 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $11.2 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014.
The expense associated with annual bonuses (a portion of which were paid or are expected to be paid in common units) was $11.6 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $11.0 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014.
The expenses shown in the table above for acquisitions relate primarily to legal and advisory costs. We incurred $3.7 million of such expenses during the six months ended September 30, 2014 related to our acquisition of TransMontaigne.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Entities
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities was $2.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $3.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was due primarily to a decrease of $2.0 million in earnings
from our investments in Glass Mountain and an ethanol production facility, partially offset by an increase of $1.1 million in earnings from our investments in BOSTCO and Frontera.
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated entities was $11.2 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $6.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was due primarily to $6.9 million of earnings from BOSTCO and Frontera that we acquired as part of our July 2014 acquisition of TransMontaigne, partially offset by a decrease of $1.8 million in earnings from our investments in Glass Mountain and an ethanol production facility.
Interest Expense
Interest expense includes interest expense on our revolving credit facilities and senior notes, amortization of debt issuance costs, letter of credit fees, interest on equipment financing notes, and accretion of interest on noninterest bearing debt obligations. Interest expense was $31.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $28.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in interest expense was due primarily to the increased level of debt outstanding on our Revolving Credit Facility (hereinafter defined) (the average balance outstanding on our Revolving Credit Facility was $1.6 billion during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $1.0 billion during three months ended September 30, 2014), primarily to finance acquisitions and capital expenditures.
Interest expense was $62.4 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $49.1 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. The increase in interest expense was due primarily to the increased level of debt outstanding on our Revolving Credit Facility (the average balance outstanding on our Revolving Credit Facility was $1.6 billion during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $1.0 billion during six months ended September 30, 2014), primarily to finance acquisitions and capital expenditures. The increase in interest expense was also due in part to the fact that we issued $400.0 million of fixed-rate notes during July 2014, and the interest rate on these notes has been higher than the interest rate on the Revolving Credit Facility. The increase in interest expense was also due in part to increased interest expense associated with TLPs credit facility. This increase was due primarily to the fact that we did not acquire our ownership interest in TLP until July 2014.
Other Income (Expense), Net
The following table summarizes the components of other income (expense), net for the periods indicated:
Interest income
2,823
633
6,700
1,224
Crude oil marketing arrangement
(1,887
(1,692
(5,835
(3,747
1,019
442
(85
1,515
Interest income relates primarily to a loan receivable associated with our financing of the construction of a natural gas liquids facility being used by a third party and a loan receivable from an equity method investee. Amounts reflected in the table above for crude oil marketing agreement relate to another partys share of the profits generated from a joint marketing arrangement.
Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
We have certain taxable corporate subsidiaries in the United States and in Canada, and our operations in Texas are subject to a state franchise tax that is calculated based on revenues net of cost of sales. Our fiscal years 2012 to 2015 generally remain subject to examination by federal, state, and Canadian tax authorities. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years in which these temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Changes in tax rates are recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Income tax benefit was $2.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $1.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. TransMontaigne was a taxable subsidiary from July 1, 2014 (the date we acquired TransMontaigne) to December 30, 2014 (the date we converted TransMontaigne to a non-taxable entity). Income tax benefit during the three months ended September 30, 2015 includes a benefit of $3.6 million related to a change in estimate of the income tax obligation payable related to TransMontaigne.
Income tax benefit was $2.2 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $0.9 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. TransMontaigne was a taxable subsidiary from July 1, 2014 (the date we acquired TransMontaigne) to December 30, 2014 (the date we converted TransMontaigne to a non-taxable entity). Income tax benefit during the six months ended September 30, 2015 includes a benefit of $3.6 million related to a change in estimate of the income tax obligation payable related to TransMontaigne.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $2.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $3.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests was $6.8 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $3.4 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was due primarily to the July 2014 acquisition of TransMontaigne, in which we acquired a 19.7% limited partner interest in TLP.
Seasonality
Seasonality impacts our liquids and retail propane segments. A large portion of our retail propane business is in the residential market where propane is used primarily for home heating purposes. Consequently, for these two segments, revenues, operating profits and operating cash flows are generated mostly in the third and fourth quarters of each fiscal year. See Liquidity, Sources of Capital and Capital Resource ActivitiesCash Flows.
Liquidity, Sources of Capital and Capital Resource Activities
Our principal sources of liquidity and capital are the cash flows from our operations and borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility. Our cash flows from operations are discussed below.
Our borrowing needs vary during the year due in part to the seasonal nature of our liquids business. Our greatest working capital borrowing needs generally occur during the period of June through December, when we are building our natural gas liquids inventories in anticipation of the heating season. Our working capital borrowing needs generally decline during the period of January through March, when the cash flows from our retail propane and liquids segments are the greatest.
Our partnership agreement requires that, within 45 days after the end of each quarter, we distribute all of our available cash (as defined in our partnership agreement) to unitholders as of the record date. Available cash for any quarter generally consists of all cash on hand at the end of that quarter, less the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner, to (i) provide for the proper conduct of our business, (ii) comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other agreements, and (iii) provide funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters. TLPs partnership agreement also requires that, within 45 days after the end of each quarter, it distribute all of its available cash (as defined in its partnership agreement) to its unitholders as of the record date.
We believe that our anticipated cash flows from operations and the borrowing capacity under our Revolving Credit Facility are sufficient to meet our liquidity needs. If our plans or assumptions change or are inaccurate, or if we make acquisitions, we may need to raise additional capital. Our ability to raise additional capital, if necessary, depends on various factors and conditions, including market conditions. We cannot give any assurances that we can raise additional capital to meet these needs. Commitments or expenditures, if any, we may make toward any acquisition projects are at our discretion.
87
We continue to pursue a strategy of growth through acquisitions. We expect to consider financing future acquisitions through a variety of sources, including the use of available capacity on our Revolving Credit Facility, the issuance of common units to sellers of businesses we acquire, private placements of debt or equity securities, and public offerings of debt or equity securities. Our ability to raise additional capital through the issuance of debt or equity securities will have a significant impact on our ability to continue to pursue our growth strategy.
The Expansion Capital Facility had a total capacity of $1.258 billion for cash borrowings at September 30, 2015. At that date, we had outstanding borrowings of $1.083 billion on the Expansion Capital Facility. The Working Capital Facility had a total capacity of $1.038 billion for cash borrowings and letters of credit at September 30, 2015. At that date, we had outstanding borrowings of $656.0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $89.6 million on the Working Capital Facility. Amounts outstanding for letters of credit are not recorded as long-term debt on our condensed consolidated balance sheets, although they decrease our borrowing capacity under the Working Capital Facility. The capacity available under the Working Capital Facility may be limited by a borrowing base, as defined in the Credit Agreement, which is calculated based on the value of certain working capital items at any point in time. During October 2015, we entered into an agreement with the lenders to increase the total capacity on the Expansion Capital Facility by $150 million, as allowed for under an accordion feature in the Credit Agreement.
The Partnership and NGL Energy Finance Corp. are co-issuers of the 2019 Notes, and the obligations under the 2019 Notes are guaranteed by certain of our existing and future restricted subsidiaries that incur or guarantee indebtedness under certain of our other indebtedness, including the Revolving Credit Facility. The indenture governing the 2019 Notes contains various customary
covenants, including, without limitation, limitations on fundamental changes and limitations on indebtedness and liens. Our obligations under the indenture may be accelerated following certain events of default (subject to applicable cure periods), including, without limitation, (i) the failure to pay principal or interest when due, (ii) experiencing an event of default on certain other debt agreements, or (iii) certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency.
TLP is party to a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks that provides for a revolving credit facility (the TLP Credit Facility). The TLP Credit Facility provides for a maximum borrowing line of credit equal to the lesser of (i) $400 million or (ii) 4.75 times Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the TLP Credit Facility). The terms of the TLP Credit Facility include covenants that restrict TLPs ability to make cash distributions, acquisitions and investments, including investments in joint ventures. TLP may make distributions of cash to the extent of TLPs available cash as defined in TLPs partnership agreement. TLP may make acquisitions and investments that meet the definition of permitted acquisitions, other investments which may not exceed 5% of consolidated
89
net tangible assets, and additional future permitted JV investments up to $125 million, which may include additional investments in BOSTCO. The commitments under the TLP Credit Facility mature on July 31, 2018.
Accounts receivabletrade
90
Revolving Credit Balances
The following table summarizes our revolving credit facility borrowings for the periods indicated:
Average
Daily
Lowest
Highest
Outstanding
Balance
893,002
739,500
672,921
582,500
756,000
TLP credit facility borrowings
253,247
245,000
263,400
346,855
114,000
578,500
640,369
339,500
1,024,500
246,750
228,000
258,500
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes the sources (uses) of our cash flows for the periods indicated:
Cash Flows Provided by (Used in)
Operating activities, before changes in operating assets and liabilities
74,014
19,091
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
100,081
(80,726
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Operating Activities. The seasonality of our natural gas liquids businesses has a significant effect on our cash flows from operating activities. Increases in natural gas liquids prices typically reduce our operating cash flows due to higher cash requirements to fund increases in inventories, and decreases in natural gas liquids prices typically increase our operating cash flows due to lower cash requirements to fund increases in inventories.
In general, our operating cash flows are at their lowest levels during our first and second fiscal quarters, or the six months ending September 30, when we experience operating losses or lower operating income as a result of lower volumes of natural gas liquids sales and when we are building our inventory levels for the upcoming heating season. Our operating cash flows are generally greatest during our third and fourth fiscal quarters, or the six months ending March 31, when our operating income levels are highest and customers pay for natural gas liquids consumed during the heating season months. We borrow under our Revolving Credit Facility to supplement our operating cash flows as necessary during our first and second fiscal quarters.
Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities was $340.9 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $750.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities was due primarily to:
· a $508.2 million decrease in cash paid for acquisitions during the six months ended September 30, 2015 due primarily to the July 2014 acquisition of TransMontaigne; and
· a $38.7 million increase in cash flows from derivatives.
These decreases were partially offset by an increase in capital expenditures from $82.9 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014, $65.7 million of which was expansion capital and $17.2 million of which was maintenance capital (of this maintenance capital, $0.1 million related to TLP), to $222.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, $196.3 million of which was expansion capital and $26.0 million of which was maintenance capital (of this maintenance capital, $7.1 million related to TLP).
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $155.6 million during the six months ended September 30, 2015, compared to $813.3 million during the six months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease in net cash provided by financing activities was due primarily to:
· $400.0 million in proceeds received from the issuance of the 2019 Notes during the six months ended September 30, 2014;
· $370.4 million in proceeds received from the sale of our common units during the six months ended September 30, 2014; and
· a $52.9 million increase in distributions paid to our partners and noncontrolling interest owners during the six months ended September 30, 2015.
These decreases were partially offset by a $172.6 million increase in borrowings on our revolving credit facilities (net of repayments) during the six months ended September 30, 2015.
The following table summarizes the distributions declared after our initial public offering:
Amount Paid To
Date Declared
Record Date
Date Paid
Per Unit
July 25, 2011
August 3, 2011
August 12, 2011
0.1669
2,467
October 21, 2011
October 31, 2011
November 14, 2011
0.3375
4,990
January 24, 2012
February 3, 2012
February 14, 2012
0.3500
7,735
April 19, 2012
April 30, 2012
May 15, 2012
0.3625
9,165
July 24, 2012
August 3, 2012
August 14, 2012
0.4125
13,574
134
October 17, 2012
October 29, 2012
November 14, 2012
0.4500
22,846
707
January 24, 2013
February 4, 2013
February 14, 2013
0.4625
24,245
April 25, 2013
May 6, 2013
May 15, 2013
0.4775
25,605
1,189
July 25, 2013
August 5, 2013
August 14, 2013
0.4938
31,725
1,739
October 23, 2013
November 4, 2013
November 14, 2013
0.5113
35,908
2,491
January 24, 2014
February 4, 2014
February 14, 2014
0.5313
42,150
4,283
April 24, 2014
May 5, 2014
May 15, 2014
0.5513
43,737
5,754
July 24, 2014
August 4, 2014
August 14, 2014
0.5888
52,036
9,481
October 24, 2014
November 4, 2014
November 14, 2014
0.6088
53,902
11,141
January 26, 2015
February 6, 2015
February 13, 2015
0.6175
54,684
11,860
April 24, 2015
May 5, 2015
May 15, 2015
0.6250
59,651
13,446
July 23, 2015
August 3, 2015
August 14, 2015
0.6325
66,244
15,483
October 22, 2015
November 3, 2015
November 13, 2015
0.6400
67,305
16,277
The following table summarizes the distributions declared by TLP after our acquisition of general and limited partner interests in TLP (exclusive of the distribution declared in July 2014, the proceeds of which we remitted to the former owners of TransMontaigne, pursuant to agreements entered into at the time of the business combination):
Amount Paid
To NGL
Other Partners
October 13, 2014
October 31, 2014
November 7, 2014
0.6650
4,010
8,614
January 8, 2015
January 30, 2015
April 13, 2015
April 30, 2015
May 7, 2015
4,007
8,617
July 13, 2015
July 31, 2015
August 7, 2015
October 12, 2015
October 30, 2015
November 6, 2015
93
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at September 30, 2015 for our fiscal years ending thereafter:
Six Months
Ending
2016
Principal payments on long-term debt
Interest payments on long-term debt
Revolving Credit Facility (1)
130,690
21,079
42,158
25,295
82,000
10,250
20,500
201,094
30,938
61,873
74,812
8,313
16,625
16,209
13,300
9,975
10,390
19,242
3,395
6,789
2,269
165
274
177
94
Letters of credit
89,647
Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases
Future minimum throughput payments under noncancelable agreements (2)
Construction commitments (3)
584,560
247,593
336,967
Fixed-price commodity purchase commitments (4)
38,651
37,706
945
Index-price commodity purchase commitments (5)
600,941
567,806
33,135
Total contractual obligations
5,901,553
1,030,861
682,684
320,118
2,373,084
632,880
861,926
Purchase commitments (thousands):
Natural gas liquids fixed-price (gallons) (6)
59,854
1,764
Natural gas liquids index-price (gallons) (6)
479,557
47,399
Crude oil fixed-price (barrels) (6)
Crude oil index-price (barrels) (6)
The estimated interest payments on our Revolving Credit Facility are based on principal and letters of credit outstanding at September 30, 2015. See Note 8 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report for additional information on our Credit Agreement.
(2)
At September 30, 2015, we had agreements with crude oil and refined products pipeline operators obligating us to minimum throughput payments in exchange for pipeline capacity commitments.
(3)
At September 30, 2015, we had the following construction commitments:
·
In October 2014, Grand Mesa Pipeline, LLC (Grand Mesa) completed a successful open season in which it received the requisite support, in the form of ship-or-pay volume commitments from multiple shippers, to begin construction of a 20-inch pipeline system. We anticipate that the pipeline will commence service in the second half of calendar year 2016. At September 30, 2015, the construction commitments for Grand Mesa were $562.8 million.
In February 2015, we acquired Sawtooth, which owns a natural gas liquids salt dome storage facility in Utah with rail and truck access to western United States markets. As part of this acquisition, we also entered into a construction agreement to expand the storage capacity of the facility. We anticipate this project will be completed by the end of calendar year 2015. At September 30, 2015, the construction commitments for this project were $21.8 million.
(4)
At September 30, 2015, we had the following purchase commitments (in thousands):
Natural gas liquids fixed-price
Crude oil fixed-price
(5)
Natural gas liquids index-price
Crude oil index-price
Index prices are based on a forward price curve at September 30, 2015. A theoretical change of $0.10 per gallon in the underlying commodity price at September 30, 2015 would result in a change of $52.7 million in the value of our index-price natural gas liquids purchase commitments. A theoretical change of $1.00 per barrel in the underlying commodity price at September 30, 2015 would result in a change of $8.0 million in the value of our index-price crude oil purchase commitments.
(6)
At September 30, 2015, we had the following sales contract volumes (in thousands):
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements other than the operating leases described in Note 10 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.
Environmental Legislation
Please see our Annual Report for a discussion of proposed environmental legislation and regulations that, if enacted, could result in increased compliance and operating costs. However, at this time we cannot predict the structure or outcome of any future legislation or regulations or the eventual cost we could incur in compliance.
Trends
Crude oil prices can fluctuate widely based on changes in supply and demand conditions. The opportunity to generate revenues in our crude oil logistics business is heavily influenced by the volume of crude oil being produced. Crude oil prices declined sharply during the nine months ended March 31, 2015 (the spot price for NYMEX West Texas Intermediate crude oil at Cushing, Oklahoma declined from $105.34 per barrel at July 1, 2014 to $45.09 per barrel at September 30, 2015). While crude oil production in the United States has been strong in recent years, the sharp decline in crude oil prices has reduced the incentive for producers to expand production. If crude oil prices remain low, resultant declines in crude oil production may adversely impact volumes in our crude oil logistics business.
Since January 2015, crude oil markets have been in contango (a condition in which the forward crude price is greater than the spot price). Our crude oil logistics business benefits when the market is in contango, as increasing prices result in inventory holding gains during the time between when we purchase inventory and when we sell it. In addition, we are able to better use our storage assets when crude oil markets are in contango.
Our opportunity to generate revenues in our water solutions business is based on the level of production of natural gas and crude oil in the areas where our facilities are located. As described above, crude oil prices declined sharply during the year ended
95
March 31, 2015. At current market prices, producers may reduce drilling activity, which could have an adverse impact on the volumes of our water solutions business.
A portion of the revenues of our water solutions business is generated from the sale of hydrocarbons that we recover when processing the wastewater. Because of this, lower crude oil prices result in lower per barrel revenues for our water solutions business.
An important element of our refined products and renewables segment relates to the marketing of refined products in the Southeast and East Coast regions. We purchase product in the Gulf Coast, transport the product on third party pipelines, and sell the product primarily at TLPs refined products terminals. Most of the contracts with these customers are one year in duration, with pricing indexed to prices in the Gulf Coast at the date of sale plus a specified differential. To operate this business we maintain inventory in transit on the third party pipelines and at the destination terminals where we sell the product. The value of this inventory will increase or decrease as market prices change. In order to mitigate this risk, we enter into futures contracts, which are only available based on New York Harbor pricing. Because our contracts are indexed to Gulf Coast prices and our futures contracts are based on New York Harbor prices, the futures contracts are not a perfect hedge against our inventory holding risk. During any given quarter, spreads between prices in the Gulf Coast and New York Harbor could narrow or widen, which could reduce the effectiveness of the futures contracts as a hedge of the inventory holding risk. The tenor of these futures contracts, which are typically six months to one year in duration at inception, can also contribute to volatility in earnings among individual quarters within a fiscal year.
During the three months ended September 30, 2015, prices for refined products declined. Gulf Coast prices, on which our sales contracts are based, declined more than the New York Harbor prices, on which our futures contracts are based, which had an adverse impact on our weighted-average cost of sales. Based on historical experience, we generally expect the spreads between Gulf Coast and New York Harbor prices to be more consistent over the course of a contract year than during any individual quarter within the year, and that we should expect more volatility in weighted-average cost of sales among quarters within a fiscal year than we would expect during a full fiscal year.
The decline in crude oil prices has had an adverse impact on many participants in the energy markets, and the inherent risk of customer or counterparty nonperformance is higher when crude oil prices are low or in decline.
In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 201511, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory. ASU No. 201511 requires that inventory within the scope of the guidance be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The ASU is effective for the Partnership beginning April 1, 2017, although early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our current accounting policies.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 201503, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. ASU No. 201503 requires that debt issuance costs (excluding costs associated with revolving debt arrangements) be presented in the balance sheet as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt. We plan to adopt this ASU effective March 31, 2016, when we will begin presenting debt issuance costs as a reduction to long-term debt, rather than as an intangible asset. At September 30, 2015, intangible assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet include $16.1 million of debt issuance costs associated with our senior notes that, upon adoption of ASU No. 201503, would be reclassified as a reduction to long-term debt. The ASU requires retrospective application for all prior periods presented. At March 31, 2015, intangible assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheet include $17.8 million of debt issuance costs associated with our senior notes that, upon adoption of ASU No. 201503, will be reclassified as a reduction to long-term debt.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 201409, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU No. 201409 will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The core principle of this ASU is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. The ASU is effective for the Partnership beginning April 1, 2018, and allows for both full retrospective and modified retrospective (with cumulative effect) methods of adoption. We are in the process of determining the method of adoption and assessing the impact of this ASU on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with GAAP requires the selection and application of appropriate accounting principles to the relevant facts and circumstances of the Partnerships operations and the use of estimates made by management. We have identified the following accounting policies that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations. The application of these accounting policies, which requires subjective or complex judgments regarding estimates and projected outcomes of future events, and changes in these accounting policies, could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
96
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Goodwill is subject to at least an annual assessment for impairment. We perform our annual assessment of impairment during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year, and more frequently if circumstances warrant. To perform this assessment, we consider qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount. The assessment of the value of our reporting units requires us to make certain assumptions relating to future operations. When evaluating operating performance, various factors are considered, such as current and changing economic conditions and the commodity price environment, among others. If the growth assumptions embodied in the current year impairment testing prove inaccurate, we could incur an impairment charge.
Crude oil prices decreased significantly during our prior fiscal year, and crude oil prices have remained low during our current fiscal year. This has had an unfavorable impact on our water solutions business. The volume of water we process is driven in part by the level of crude oil production, and the lower crude oil prices have given producers less incentive to expand production. In addition, a significant portion of the revenues of our water solutions business are generated from the sale of crude oil that we recover in the process of treating the wastewater, and low crude oil prices have an adverse impact on these revenues. We will consider these factors in preparing our goodwill impairment assessment during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year. Our water solutions segment has $467.1 million of goodwill at September 30, 2015. If we later conclude that this goodwill is impaired, we will record a reduction to goodwill and a related impairment expense.
We evaluate property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangible assets for potential impairment when events and circumstances warrant such a review. A long-lived asset group is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted future cash flows from the use and eventual disposition of the asset group is less than its carrying value.
We evaluate equity method investments for impairment when we believe the current fair value may be less than the carrying amount. We record impairments of equity method investments if we believe the decline in value is other than temporary.
We are required to recognize the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. In order to determine the fair value of such a liability, we must make certain estimates and assumptions including, among other things, projected cash flows, the estimated timing of retirement, a credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate, and an assessment of market conditions, which could significantly impact the estimated fair value of the asset retirement obligation. These estimates and assumptions are very subjective and can vary over time. Our condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2015 includes a liability of $4.8 million related to asset retirement obligations, which is reported within other noncurrent liabilities. This liability is related to contractual and regulatory obligations at certain facilities for which we have to perform remediation, dismantlement, or removal activities when the assets are retired.
97
Depreciation Methods and Estimated Useful Lives of Property, Plant and Equipment
Depreciation expense is the systematic write-off of the cost of our property, plant and equipment, net of residual or salvage value (if any), to the results of operations for the quarterly and annual periods during which the assets are used. We depreciate the majority of our property, plant and equipment using the straight-line method, which results in us recording depreciation expense evenly over the estimated life of the individual asset. The estimate of depreciation expense requires us to make assumptions regarding the useful economic lives and residual values of our assets. When we acquire and place our property, plant and equipment in service, we develop assumptions about the useful economic lives and residual values of such assets that we believe to be reasonable; however, circumstances may develop that could require us to change these assumptions in future periods, which would change our depreciation expense prospectively. Examples of such circumstances include changes in laws and regulations that limit the estimated economic life of an asset, changes in technology that render an asset obsolete, or changes in expected salvage values.
Amortization of Intangible Assets
Amortization expense is the systematic write-off of the cost of our amortizable intangible assets to the results of operations for the quarterly and annual periods during which the assets are used. We amortize the majority of these intangible assets using the straight-line method, which results in us recording amortization expense evenly over the estimated life of the individual asset. The estimate of amortization expense requires us to make assumptions regarding the useful economic lives of our assets. When we acquire intangible assets, we develop assumptions about the useful economic lives of such assets that we believe to be reasonable; however, circumstances may develop that could require us to change these assumptions in future periods, which would change our amortization expense prospectively. Examples of such circumstances include changes in customer attrition rates and changes in laws and regulations that could limit the estimated economic life of an asset.
Tank Bottoms
Tank bottoms, which are product volumes required for the operation of storage tanks, are recorded at historical cost within property, plant and equipment on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We recover tank bottoms when the storage tanks are removed from service. The following table summarizes the tank bottoms reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2015:
(in barrels)
Linefill
We have entered into long-term commitments to ship specified minimum volumes of crude oil on certain third-party owned pipelines. These agreements require that we maintain a certain minimum amount of crude oil in the pipeline to serve as linefill over the duration of the agreement. We report such linefill at historical cost within other noncurrent assets on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. At September 30, 2015, linefill was $35.1 million and consisted of 487,104 barrels of crude oil.
Business Combinations
We have made in the past, and expect to make in the future, acquisitions of other businesses. We record business combinations using the acquisition method, in which the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their acquisition date fair values. Fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based upon available information and may involve engaging an independent third party to perform an appraisal. Estimating fair values can be complex and subject to significant business judgment. We must also identify and include in the allocation all acquired tangible and intangible assets that meet certain criteria, including assets that were not previously recorded by the acquired entity. The estimates most commonly involve property, plant and equipment and intangible assets, including those with indefinite lives. The estimates also include the fair value of contracts including commodity purchase and sale agreements, storage contracts, and transportation contracts. The excess of the purchase price over the net fair value of acquired assets and assumed liabilities is recorded as goodwill, which is not amortized but is reviewed annually for impairment. Pursuant to GAAP, an entity is allowed no more than one year to obtain the information necessary to identify and measure the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. The impact of subsequent changes to the identification of assets and liabilities may require retrospective adjustments to our previously reported consolidated financial position and results of operations.
Our inventories consist primarily of crude oil, natural gas liquids, refined products, ethanol, and biodiesel. The market values of these commodities change on a daily basis as supply and demand conditions change. We value our inventories at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using either the weighted-average cost or the first in, first out (FIFO) methods, including the cost of transportation and storage. Market is determined based on estimated replacement cost using prices at the end of the reporting period. At the end of each fiscal year, we also perform a lower of cost or market analysis; if the cost basis of the inventories would not be recoverable based on market prices at the end of the year, we reduce the book value of the inventories to the recoverable amount. In performing this analysis, we consider fixed-price forward commitments and the opportunity to transfer propane inventory from our wholesale liquids business to our retail propane business to sell the inventory in retail markets. When performing this analysis during interim periods within a fiscal year, accounting standards do not require us to record a lower of cost or market write-down if we expect the market values to recover by our fiscal year end. We are unable to control changes in the market value of these commodities and are unable to determine whether write-downs will be required in future periods. In addition, write-downs at interim periods could be required if we cannot conclude that market values will recover sufficiently by our fiscal year end.
Equity-Based Compensation
Our general partner has granted certain restricted units to employees and directors under a long-term incentive plan. These units vest in tranches, subject to the continued service of the recipients. The awards may also vest in the event of a change in control, at the discretion of the board of directors.
The restricted units include awards that vest contingent on the continued service of the recipients through the vesting date (the Service Awards). The restricted units also include awards that are contingent both on the continued service of the recipients through the vesting date and also on the performance of our common units relative to other entities in the Alerian MLP Index over specified periods of time (the Performance Awards).
We record the expense for the first tranche of each Service Award on a straight-line basis over the period beginning with the grant date of the awards and ending with the vesting date of the tranche. We record the expense for succeeding tranches over the period beginning with the vesting date of the previous tranche and ending with the vesting date of the tranche. At each balance sheet date, we adjust the cumulative expense recorded using the estimated fair value of the awards at the balance sheet date. We calculate the fair value of the awards using the closing price of our common units on the New York Stock Exchange on the balance sheet date, adjusted to reflect the fact that the holders of the unvested units are not entitled to distributions during the vesting period. We estimate the impact of the lack of distribution rights during the vesting period using the value of the most recent distribution and assumptions that a market participant might make about future distribution growth.
We record the expense for each of the tranches of the Performance Awards on a straight-line basis over the period beginning with the grant date and ending with the vesting date of the tranche. At each balance sheet date, we adjust the cumulative expense recorded using the estimated fair value of the awards at the balance sheet date. We calculate the fair value of the awards using a Monte Carlo simulation.
We report unvested units as liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. When units vest and are issued, we record an increase to equity.
99
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
A significant portion of our long-term debt is variable-rate debt. Changes in interest rates impact the interest payments of our variable-rate debt but generally do not impact the fair value of the liability. Conversely, changes in interest rates impact the fair value of the fixed-rate debt but do not impact its cash flows.
Commodity Price and Credit Risk
Our operations are subject to certain business risks, including commodity price risk and credit risk. Commodity price risk is the risk that the market value of crude oil, natural gas liquids, and refined products will change, either favorably or unfavorably, in response to changing market conditions. Credit risk is the risk of loss from nonperformance by suppliers, customers or financial counterparties to a contract.
Procedures and limits for managing commodity price risks and credit risks are specified in our market risk policy and credit risk policy, respectively. Open commodity positions and market price changes are monitored daily and are reported to senior management and to marketing operations personnel. Credit risk is monitored daily and exposure is minimized through customer deposits, restrictions on product liftings, letters of credit, and entering into master netting agreements that allow for offsetting counterparty receivable and payable balances for certain transactions. At September 30, 2015, our primary counterparties were retailers, resellers, energy marketers, producers, refiners, and dealers.
The crude oil, natural gas liquids, and refined products industries are margin-based and cost-plus businesses in which gross profits depend on the differential of sales prices over supply costs. We have no control over market conditions. As a result, our profitability may be impacted by sudden and significant changes in the price of crude oil, natural gas liquids, and refined products.
We engage in various types of forward contracts and financial derivative transactions to reduce the effect of price volatility on our product costs, to protect the value of our inventory positions, and to help ensure the availability of product during periods of short supply. We attempt to balance our contractual portfolio by purchasing volumes when we have a matching purchase commitment from our wholesale and retail customers. We may experience net unbalanced positions from time to time. In addition to our ongoing policy to maintain a balanced position, for accounting purposes we are required, on an ongoing basis, to track and report the market value of our derivative portfolio.
Although we use financial derivative instruments to reduce the market price risk associated with forecasted transactions, we do not account for financial derivative transactions as hedges. We record the changes in fair value of these financial derivative transactions within cost of sales. The following table summarizes the hypothetical impact on the September 30, 2015 fair value of our commodity derivatives of an increase of 10% in the value of the underlying commodity (in thousands):
Increase
(Decrease)
To Fair Value
Crude oil (crude oil logistics segment)
(4,063
Crude oil (water solutions segment)
(3,077
Propane (liquids segment)
1,956
Other products (liquids segment)
(325
Refined products (refined products and renewables segment)
(15,995
Renewables (refined products and renewables segment)
(10,950
We use observable market values for determining the fair value of our derivative instruments. In cases where actively quoted prices are not available, other external sources are used which incorporate information about commodity prices in actively quoted markets, quoted prices in less active markets and other market fundamental analysis.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13(a)15(e) and 15(d)15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our filings and submissions under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of our general partner, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
We completed an evaluation under the supervision and with participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of our general partner, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures at September 30, 2015. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of our general partner have concluded that as of September 30, 2015, such disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide the reasonable assurance described above.
Other than changes that have resulted or may result from our acquisition of TransMontaigne, as discussed below, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13(a)15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended September 30, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
We acquired TransMontaigne and certain related operations in July 2014, as described in Note 4 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report. At this time, we continue to evaluate the business and internal controls and processes associated with TransMontaigne and are making various changes to its operating and organizational structure based on our business plan. We are in the process of implementing our internal control structure over this acquired business. We expect that our evaluation and integration efforts related to these operations will continue into future fiscal quarters.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
For information related to legal proceedings, please see the discussion under the caption Legal Contingencies in Note 10 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q, which information is incorporated by reference into this Item 1.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1ARisk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended March 31, 2015.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On September 10, 2015, the Board of Directors of our general partner authorized a unit repurchase program, under which we may repurchase up to $45 million of our outstanding common units through March 31, 2016. We may repurchase units from time to time in the open market or in other privately negotiated transactions. The unit repurchase program authorization does not obligate us to repurchase any dollar amount or number of our units. The following table summarizes the repurchase of common units during the three months ended September 30, 2015.
Total Number of
Common Units
Approximate Dollar Value
Average Price
Purchased as Part
of Common Units
Paid Per
of Publicly Announced
that May Yet Be Purchased
Period
Purchased
Common Unit
Program
Under the Program
July 131, 2015
August 131, 2015
September 130, 2015
157,626
23.16
41,349,748
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Number
Exhibit
4.1
*
Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 21, 2015, among NGL Energy Partners LP, NGL Energy Finance Corp., the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries party thereto, the Guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
4.2
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 21, 2015, among NGL Energy Partners LP, NGL Energy Finance Corp., the Guaranteeing Subsidiaries party thereto, the Guarantors party thereto and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
10.1
Amendment No. 10 to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2015 and effective as of July 31, 2015, among NGL Energy Operating LLC, the Partnership, the subsidiary borrowers party thereto, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas and the other financial institutions party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8K (File No. 00135172) filed on August 4, 2015)
12.1
Computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS
**
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
Exhibits filed with this report.
The following documents are formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2015 and March 31, 2015, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three months and six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the six months ended September 30, 2015, (v) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, and (vi) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NGL ENERGY PARTNERS LP
By:
NGL Energy Holdings LLC, its general partner
Date: November 9, 2015
/s/ H. Michael Krimbill
H. Michael Krimbill
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Atanas H. Atanasov
Atanas H. Atanasov
Chief Financial Officer
INDEX TO EXHIBITS