Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$140.430 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
NNN REIT
NNN
#2336
Rank
$7.97 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$41.98
Share price
0.77%
Change (1 day)
10.33%
Change (1 year)
๐ Real estate
๐ฐ Investment
๐๏ธ REITs
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
Annual Reports (10-K)
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
NNN REIT
Annual Reports (10-K)
Financial Year 2014
NNN REIT - 10-K annual report 2014
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 001-11290
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
56-1431377
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
450 South Orange Avenue, Suite 900
Orlando, Florida 32801
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (407) 265-7348
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
6.625% Series D Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value
5.700% Series E Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value
Name of exchange on which registered:
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
¨
No
x
The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30,
2014
was $4,578,105,000.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 12, 2015 was 132,216,969.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Registrant incorporates by reference into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K portions of National Retail Properties, Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Regulation 14A. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
REFERENCE
Part I
Item 1.
Business
1
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
6
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
14
Item 2.
Properties
14
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
14
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
14
Part II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
15
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
18
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
20
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
37
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
38
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
72
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
72
Item 9B.
Other Information
73
Part III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
74
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
74
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
74
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
74
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
74
Part IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
75
Signatures
80
PART I
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the terms “registrant” or “NNN” or the “Company” refer to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”
Statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K, including the documents that are incorporated by reference, that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Also, when NNN uses any of the words “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” or similar expressions, NNN is making forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon present expectations and reasonable assumptions, NNN’s actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those NNN anticipates or projects are described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any document incorporated herein by reference. NNN undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1.
Business
The Company
NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. NNN's assets include: real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable, and commercial mortgage residual interests.
Real Estate Assets
NNN acquires, owns, invests in and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and are primarily held for investment (“Properties” or “Property Portfolio,” and each individually, a "Property"). As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN owned
2,054
Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately
22,479,000
square feet, located in
47
states, with a weighted average remaining lease term of 12 years. Approximately
99
percent of the Properties were leased as of
December 31, 2014
.
Competition
NNN generally competes with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors including but not limited to insurance companies, pension funds and financial institutions that own, manage, finance or develop retail and net leased properties.
Employees
As of January 30, 2015
, NNN employed
64
associates.
Other Information
NNN’s executive offices are located at 450 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 900, Orlando, Florida 32801, and its telephone number is (407) 265-7348. NNN has a website at
www.nnnreit.com
where NNN’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) can be downloaded free of charge.
The common shares of National Retail Properties, Inc. are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “NNN.” The depositary shares, each representing a 1/100
th
of a share of 6.625% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series D Preferred Stock”), of NNN are traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “NNNPRD.” The depositary shares, each representing a 1/100
th
of a share of 5.700% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series E Preferred Stock”), of NNN are traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “NNNPRE.”
1
Business Strategies and Policies
The following is a discussion of NNN’s operating strategy and certain of its investment, financing and other policies. These strategies and policies have been set by management and the Board of Directors and, in general, may be amended or revised from time to time by management and the Board of Directors without a vote of NNN’s stockholders.
Operating Strategies
NNN’s strategy is to invest primarily in retail real estate that is typically well located within each local market for its tenants’ retail lines of trade. Management believes that these types of properties, generally leased pursuant to triple-net leases, provide attractive opportunities for a stable current return and the potential for increased returns and capital appreciation. Triple-net leases typically require the tenant to pay property operating expenses such as insurance, utilities, repairs, maintenance, capital expenditures and real estate taxes and assessments. Initial lease terms are generally 15 to 20 years.
NNN holds real estate assets until it determines that the sale of such an asset is advantageous in view of NNN’s investment objectives. In deciding whether to sell a real estate asset, NNN may consider factors such as potential capital appreciation, net cash flow, tenant credit quality, tenant's line of trade, market lease rates, local market conditions, potential use of sale proceeds and federal income tax considerations.
NNN’s management team focuses on certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. These key indicators include the composition of the Property Portfolio (such as tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of the Property Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios and profitability measures, industry trends and NNN's performance compared to that of the REIT industry.
The operating strategies employed by NNN have allowed NNN to increase the annual dividend (paid quarterly) per common share for
25
consecutive years, one of only four publicly traded REIT's to do so.
Investment in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate
NNN’s management believes that single tenant, freestanding net lease retail properties will continue to provide attractive investment opportunities and that NNN is well suited to take advantage of these opportunities because of its experience in accessing capital markets, and its ability to source, underwrite and acquire properties.
In evaluating a particular acquisition, management may consider a variety of factors, including:
•
the location, visibility and accessibility of the property,
•
the geographic area and demographic characteristics of the community, as well as the local real estate market, including potential for growth, market rents, and existing or potential competing properties or retailers,
•
the size, age and title status of the property,
•
the purchase price,
•
the non-financial terms of the proposed acquisition,
•
the availability of funds or other consideration for the proposed acquisition and the cost thereof,
•
the compatibility of the property with NNN’s existing portfolio,
•
the quality of construction and design and the current physical condition of the property,
•
the property-level operating history,
•
the financial and other characteristics of the existing tenant,
•
the tenant’s business plan, operating history and management team,
•
the tenant’s industry,
•
the terms of any existing leases,
•
the rent to be paid by the tenant,
•
the potential for, and current extent of, any environmental problems, and
•
any existing indebtedness encumbering the property which may be assumed or incurred in connection with acquiring or refinancing these investments.
NNN intends to engage in future investment activities in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of its status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. Additionally, NNN does not intend to engage in activities that will make NNN an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
2
Investments in Real Estate Mortgages, Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, and Securities of or Interests in Persons Engaged in Real Estate Activities
While NNN’s primary business objectives emphasize retail properties, NNN may invest in (i) a wide variety of property and tenant types, (ii) leases, mortgages, commercial mortgage residual interests and other types of real estate interests, (iii) loans secured by personal property, (iv) loans secured by partnerships or membership interests in partnerships or limited liability companies, respectively, or (v) securities of other REITs, or other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities.
Financing Strategy
NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategies while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to its stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.
NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional retail properties with cash from its
$650,000,000
unsecured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). As of
December 31, 2014
, there was
no
outstanding balance and
$650,000,000
was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility.
As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN’s ratio of total debt to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation and amortization) was approximately
33
percent and the ratio of secured indebtedness to total gross assets was less than
one
-percent. The ratio of total debt to total market capitalization was approximately
24
percent. Certain financial agreements contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances.
NNN anticipates it will be able to obtain additional financing for short-term and long-term liquidity requirements as further described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity.” However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.
The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy at any time.
Strategies and Policy Changes
Any of NNN’s strategies or policies described above may be changed at any time by NNN without notice to or a vote of NNN’s stockholders.
Property Portfolio
As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN owned
2,054
Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately
22,479,000
square feet, located in
47
states, with a weighted average remaining lease term of
12
years. Approximately
99
percent of total Properties were leased as of
December 31, 2014
.
The following table summarizes the Property Portfolio as of
December 31, 2014
(in thousands):
Size
(1)
Acquisition Cost
(2)
High
Low
Average
High
Low
Average
Land
2,223
2
98
$
8,882
$
5
$
894
Building
142
1
11
29,373
19
1,717
(1)
Approximate square feet.
(2)
Costs vary depending upon size, local market conditions and other factors.
3
As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments on leased Properties. The improvements are estimated to be completed within 12 months. These construction commitments are outlined in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Number of properties
26
Total commitment
(1)
$
110,081
Amount funded
$
57,465
Remaining commitment
$
52,616
(1)
Includes land, construction costs, tenant improvements and lease costs.
Leases
The following is a summary of the general structure of the leases in the Property Portfolio, although the specific terms of each lease can vary. Generally, the Property leases provide for initial terms of 15 to 20 years. As of
December 31, 2014
, the weighted average remaining lease term of the Property Portfolio was approximately
12
years. The Properties are generally leased under net leases, pursuant to which the tenant typically bears responsibility for substantially all property costs and expenses associated with ongoing maintenance and operation, including utilities, property taxes and insurance. NNN's leases provide for annual base rental payments (payable in monthly installments) ranging from $1,000 to $2,656,000 (average of $211,000), and generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), and/or, to a lesser extent, increases in the tenant’s sales volume.
Generally, NNN's leases provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions provided under the initial lease term. Some of the leases also provide that in the event NNN wishes to sell the Property subject to that lease, NNN first must offer the lessee the right to purchase the Property on the same terms and conditions as any offer which NNN intends to accept for the sale of the Property.
The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of the Property Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of
December 31, 2014
:
% of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
% of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
2015
1.2%
30
384,000
2021
4.4%
102
1,005,000
2016
1.5%
31
558,000
2022
6.4%
95
1,171,000
2017
3.2%
49
1,074,000
2023
3.0%
55
946,000
2018
6.9%
182
1,643,000
2024
2.9%
50
771,000
2019
3.4%
74
1,030,000
Thereafter
63.2%
1,236
11,950,000
2020
3.9%
112
1,406,000
(1)
Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of
December 31, 2014
.
(2)
Approximate square feet.
4
The following table summarizes the diversification of the Property Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:
% of Annual Base Rent
(1)
Top 10 Lines of Trade
2014
2013
2012
1.
Convenience stores
18.0%
19.7%
19.8%
2.
Restaurants - full service
9.1%
9.7%
10.7%
3.
Automotive service
7.2%
7.6%
7.6%
4.
Restaurants - limited service
6.5%
5.5%
5.2%
5.
Theaters
5.2%
4.5%
4.7%
6.
Family entertainment centers
5.1%
2.3%
2.1%
7.
Automotive parts
4.7%
5.1%
5.6%
8.
Health and fitness
3.9%
4.3%
3.7%
9.
Banks
3.7%
4.1%
0.2%
10.
Sporting goods
3.5%
3.7%
4.0%
Other
33.1%
33.5%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
(1)
Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.
The following table summarizes the diversification of the Property Portfolio by state as of
December 31, 2014
:
State
# of
Properties
% of
Annual
Base Rent
(1)
1.
Texas
419
20.4%
2.
Florida
168
9.7%
3.
North Carolina
130
5.5%
4.
Illinois
71
5.0%
5.
Georgia
109
4.9%
6.
Virginia
87
4.2%
7.
Indiana
84
4.0%
8.
Ohio
60
3.3%
9.
Pennsylvania
99
3.3%
10.
California
40
3.1%
Other
787
36.6%
2,054
100.0%
(1)
Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of
December 31, 2014
.
As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN did not have any tenant that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental income.
Mortgages and Notes Receivable
Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
Mortgages and notes receivable
$
10,974
$
16,942
Accrued interest receivable
101
177
$
11,075
$
17,119
5
Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests
NNN holds the commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven securitizations. Each of the Residuals is reported at fair value; unrealized gains or losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity, and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. The Residuals had an estimated fair value of
$11,626,000
and
$11,721,000
at
December 31, 2014
and
2013
, respectively.
Governmental Regulations Affecting Properties
Property Environmental Considerations.
Subject to a determination of the level of risk and potential cost of remediation, NNN may acquire a property where some level of environmental contamination may exist. Investments in real property create a potential for substantial environmental liability for the owner of such property from the presence or discharge of hazardous materials on the property or the improper disposal of hazardous materials emanating from the property, regardless of fault. In order to mitigate exposure to environmental liability, NNN maintains an environmental insurance policy that covers substantially all of the properties which expires in August 2018. As a part of its acquisition due diligence process, NNN obtains an environmental site assessment for each property. In such cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the problem, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance to address environmental conditions at the property.
As of
February 13, 2015
, NNN has
69
Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation and/or monitoring. In general, the seller, a previous owner, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Properties.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
The Properties, as commercial facilities, are required to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and similar state and local laws and regulations (collectively, the “ADA”). Investigation of a property may reveal non-compliance with the ADA. The tenants will typically have primary responsibility for complying with the ADA, but NNN may incur costs if the tenant does not comply. As of
February 13, 2015
, NNN has not been notified by any governmental authority of, nor is NNN’s management aware of, any non-compliance with the ADA that NNN’s management believes would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position or results of operations.
Other Regulations.
State and local fire, life-safety and similar entities regulate the use of the Properties. NNN’s leases generally require each tenant to undertake primary responsibility for complying with regulations, but failure to comply could result in fines by governmental authorities, awards of damages to private litigants, or restrictions on the ability to conduct business on such properties.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Carefully consider the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. If any of the events or developments described below were actually to occur, NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.
Financial and economic conditions may have an adverse impact on NNN, its tenants, and commercial real estate in general.
Financial and economic conditions continue to be challenging and volatile and any worsening of such conditions, including any disruption in the capital markets, could adversely affect NNN’s business and results of operations and the financial condition of NNN’s tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or the institutions that hold NNN’s cash balances and short-term investments, which may expose NNN to increased risks of default by these parties.
There can be no assurance that actions of the United States Government, the Federal Reserve or other government and regulatory bodies intended to stabilize the economy or financial markets will achieve their intended effect. Additionally, some of these actions may adversely affect financial institutions, capital providers, retailers, consumers, NNN’s financial condition, NNN's results of operations or the trading price of NNN’s shares.
6
Potential consequences of challenging and volatile financial and economic conditions include:
•
the financial condition of NNN’s tenants may be adversely affected, which may result in tenant defaults under the leases due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failures or for other reasons;
•
the ability to borrow on terms and conditions that NNN finds acceptable may be limited or unavailable, which could reduce NNN’s ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt, reduce NNN’s returns from acquisition and development activities, reduce NNN’s ability to make cash distributions to its shareholders and increase NNN’s future interest expense;
•
the recognition of impairment charges on or reduced values of NNN’s Properties, which may adversely affect NNN's results of operations;
•
reduced values of the Properties may limit NNN's ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices and reduce the availability of buyer financing; and
•
the value and liquidity of NNN’s short-term investments and cash deposits could be reduced as a result of a deterioration of the financial condition of the institutions that hold NNN’s cash deposits or the institutions or assets in which NNN has made short-term investments, the dislocation of the markets for NNN’s short-term investments, increased volatility in market rates for such investments or other factors.
NNN may be unable to obtain debt or equity capital on favorable terms, if at all.
NNN may be unable to obtain capital on favorable terms, if at all, to further its business objectives or meet its existing obligations. Nearly all of NNN’s debt, including the Credit Facility, is subject to balloon principal payments due at maturity. These maturities range between 2015 and 2024. NNN's ability to make these scheduled principal payments may be adversely impacted by NNN’s inability to extend or refinance the Credit Facility, the inability to dispose of assets at an attractive price or the inability to obtain additional debt or equity capital. Capital that may be available may be materially more expensive or available under terms that are materially more restrictive which would have an adverse impact on NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Tenants loss of revenues could reduce NNN’s cash flow.
NNN's tenants encounter significant macroeconomic, governmental and competitive forces. Adverse changes in consumer spending or consumer preferences for particular goods, services or store based retailing or the expansion of e-commerce could severely impact their ability to pay rent. The default, financial distress, bankruptcy or liquidation of one or more of NNN’s tenants could cause substantial vacancies in the Property Portfolio. Vacancies reduce NNN’s revenues, increase property expenses and could decrease the value of each such vacant Property. Upon the expiration of a lease, the tenant may choose not to renew the lease and/or NNN may not be able to re-lease the vacant Property at a comparable lease rate or without incurring additional expenditures in connection with such renewal or re-leasing.
A significant portion of the source of the Property Portfolio annual base rent is concentrated in specific industry classifications, tenants and in specific geographic locations.
As of
December 31, 2014
, approximately,
•
46.0% of the Property Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five retail lines of trade, including convenience stores (18.0%) and full-service restaurants (9.1%),
•
22.8% of the Property Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five tenants, including Energy Transfer Partners (Sunoco) (6.5%), Mister Car Wash (4.6%), Pantry (4.0%), 7-Eleven (3.9%) and LA Fitness (3.8%), and
•
45.5% of the Property Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five states, including Texas (20.4%) and Florida (9.7%).
Any financial hardship and/or economic changes in these lines of trade, tenants or states could have an adverse effect on NNN’s results of operations.
7
Owning real estate and indirect interests in real estate carries inherent risks.
NNN’s economic performance and the value of its real estate assets are subject to the risk that if the Properties do not generate revenues sufficient to meet its operating expenses, including debt service, NNN’s cash flow and ability to pay distributions to its shareholders will be adversely affected. As a real estate company, NNN is susceptible to the following real estate industry risks, which are beyond its control:
•
changes in national, regional and local economic conditions and outlook,
•
decreases in consumer spending and retail sales or adverse changes in consumer preferences for particular goods, services or store based retailing,
•
economic downturns in the areas where the Properties are located,
•
adverse changes in local real estate market conditions, such as an oversupply of space, reduction in demand for space, intense competition for tenants, or a demographic change,
•
changes in tenant or consumer preferences that reduce the attractiveness of the Properties to tenants,
•
changes in zoning, regulatory restrictions, or tax laws, and
•
changes in interest rates or availability of financing.
All of these factors could result in decreases in market rental rates and increases in vacancy rates, which could adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.
NNN’s real estate investments are illiquid.
Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, NNN’s ability to adjust the portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions is limited. Certain significant expenditures generally do not change in response to economic or other conditions, including: (i) debt service (if any), (ii) real estate taxes, and (iii) operating and maintenance costs. This combination of variable revenue and relatively fixed expenditures may result, under certain market conditions, in reduced earnings and could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.
Costs of complying with changes in governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.
NNN cannot predict what other laws or regulations will be enacted in the future, how future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted, or how future laws or regulations will affect NNN or its Properties, including, but not limited to environmental laws and regulations. Compliance with new laws or regulations, or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may require NNN, its retail tenants, or consumers to incur significant expenditures, impose significant liability, restrict or prohibit business activities and could cause a material adverse effect on NNN’s results of operation.
NNN may be subject to known or unknown environmental liabilities and hazardous materials on Properties owned by NNN.
There may be known or unknown environmental liabilities associated with properties owned or acquired in the future by NNN. Certain particular uses of some properties may also have a heightened risk of environmental liability because of the hazardous materials used in performing services on those properties, such as convenience stores with underground petroleum storage tanks or auto parts and auto service businesses using petroleum products, paint and machine solvents. Some of the Properties may contain asbestos or asbestos-containing materials, or may contain or may develop mold or other bio-contaminants. Asbestos-containing materials must be handled, managed and removed in accordance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations. Mold and other bio-contaminants can produce airborne toxins, may cause a variety of health issues in individuals and must be remediated in accordance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.
As part of its due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each Property it acquires. In cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the contamination in accordance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance. Although sellers or tenants may be contractually responsible for remediating hazardous materials on a property and may be responsible for indemnifying NNN for any liability resulting from the use of a property and for any failure to comply with any applicable environmental laws, rules or regulations, NNN has no assurance that sellers or tenants shall be able to meet their remediation and indemnity obligations to NNN. A tenant or seller may not have the financial ability to meet its remediation and indemnity obligations to NNN when required. Furthermore, NNN may have strict liability to governmental agencies or third parties as a result of the existence of hazardous materials on Properties, whether or not NNN knew about or caused such hazardous materials to exist.
8
As of
February 13, 2015
, NNN has
69
Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation and/or monitoring. In general, the seller, a previous owner, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Properties.
If NNN is responsible for hazardous materials located on its properties, NNN’s liability may include investigation and remediation costs, property damage to third parties, personal injury to third parties, and governmental fines and penalties. Furthermore, the presence of hazardous materials on a property may adversely impact the property value or NNN’s ability to sell the property. Significant environmental liability could impact NNN’s results of operations, ability to make distributions to shareholders, and its ability to meet its debt obligations.
In order to mitigate exposure to environmental liability, NNN maintains an environmental insurance policy that covers substantially all of its Properties which expires in August 2018. However, the policy is subject to exclusions and limitations and does not cover all of the Properties owned by NNN, and for those Properties covered under the policy, insurance may not fully compensate NNN for any environmental liability. NNN has no assurance that the insurer on its environmental insurance policy will be able to meet its obligations under the policy. NNN may not desire to renew the environmental insurance policy in place upon expiration or a replacement policy may not be available at a reasonable cost, if at all.
NNN may not be able to successfully execute its acquisition or development strategies.
NNN may not be able to implement its investment strategies successfully. Additionally, NNN cannot assure that its Property Portfolio will expand at all, or if it will expand at any specified rate or to any specified size. In addition, investment in additional real estate assets is subject to a number of risks. Because NNN expects to invest in markets other than the ones in which its current Properties are located or properties which may be leased to tenants other than those to which NNN has historically leased properties, NNN will also be subject to the risks associated with investment in new markets or with new tenants that may be relatively unfamiliar to NNN’s management team.
NNN’s development activities are subject to, without limitation, risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory approvals, the cost and timely completion of construction (including risks from factors beyond NNN’s control, such as weather or labor conditions or material shortages), the risk of finding tenants for the properties and the ability to obtain both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken or provide a tenant the opportunity to reduce rent or terminate a lease. Any of these situations may delay or eliminate proceeds or cash flows NNN expects from these projects, which could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.
NNN may not be able to dispose of properties consistent with its operating strategy.
NNN may be unable to sell properties targeted for disposition due to adverse market conditions. This may adversely affect, among other things, NNN’s ability to sell under favorable terms, execute its operating strategy, achieve target earnings or returns, retire or repay debt or pay dividends.
A change in the assumptions used to determine the value of commercial mortgage residual interests could adversely affect NNN’s financial position.
As of
December 31, 2014
, the Residuals had a carrying value of
$11,626,000
. The value of these Residuals is based on assumptions to determine their fair value. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, discount rate, loan loss, prepayment speed and interest rate assumptions to determine their fair value. If actual experience differs materially from these assumptions, the actual future cash flow could be less than expected and the value of the Residuals, as well as NNN’s earnings, could decline.
NNN may suffer a loss in the event of a default or bankruptcy of a borrower.
As of
December 31, 2014
, mortgages and notes receivables had an outstanding principal balance of $10,974,000. If a borrower defaults on a mortgage or other loan made by NNN, and does not have sufficient assets to satisfy the loan, NNN may suffer a loss of principal and interest. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN may not be able to recover against all or any of the assets of the borrower, or the collateral may not be sufficient to satisfy the balance due on the loan. In addition, certain of NNN’s loans may be subordinate to other debt of a borrower. These investments are typically loans secured by a borrower’s pledge of its ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets and are typically subordinated to senior loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans. If a borrower defaults on the debt senior to NNN’s loan, or in the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN’s loan will be satisfied only after the borrower’s senior creditors’ claims are satisfied. Where debt senior to NNN’s loans exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit NNN’s ability to
9
amend loan documents, assign the loans, accept prepayments, exercise remedies and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. Bankruptcy proceedings and litigation can significantly increase the time needed for NNN to acquire underlying collateral, if any, in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value. In addition, there are significant costs and delays associated with the foreclosure process.
Certain provisions of NNN’s leases or loan agreements may be unenforceable.
NNN’s rights and obligations with respect to its leases, mortgage loans or other loans are governed by written agreements. A court could determine that one or more provisions of such an agreement are unenforceable, such as a particular remedy, a loan prepayment provision or a provision governing NNN’s security interest in the underlying collateral of a borrower or lessee. NNN could be adversely impacted if this were to happen with respect to an asset or group of assets.
Property ownership through joint ventures and partnerships could limit NNN’s control of those investments.
Joint ventures or partnerships involve risks not otherwise present for direct investments by NNN. It is possible that NNN’s co-venturers or partners may have different interests or goals than NNN at any time and they may take actions contrary to NNN’s requests, policies or objectives, including NNN’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. Other risks of joint venture or partnership investments include impasses on decisions because in some instances no single co-venturer or partner has full control over the joint venture or partnership, respectively, or the co-venturer or partner may become insolvent, bankrupt or otherwise unable to contribute to the joint venture or partnership, respectively. Further, disputes may develop with a co-venturer or partner over decisions affecting the property, joint venture or partnership that may result in litigation, arbitration or some other form of dispute resolution.
Competition from numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors may impede NNN’s ability to grow.
NNN may not complete suitable property acquisitions or developments on advantageous terms, if at all, due to competition for such properties with others engaged in real estate investment activities or lack of properties for sale on terms deemed acceptable to NNN. NNN’s inability to successfully acquire or develop new properties may affect NNN’s ability to achieve anticipated return on investment or realize its investment strategy, which could have an adverse effect on its results of operations.
NNN's loss of key management personnel could adversely affect performance and the value of its common stock.
NNN is dependent on the efforts of its key management. Competition for senior management personnel can be intense and NNN may not be able to retain its key management. Although NNN believes qualified replacements could be found for any departures of key management, the loss of their services could adversely affect NNN's performance and the value of its common stock.
Uninsured losses may adversely affect NNN’s operating results and asset values.
The Properties are generally covered by comprehensive liability, fire, and extended insurance coverage. NNN believes that the insurance carried on its properties is adequate and in accordance with industry standards. There are, however, types of losses (such as from hurricanes, earthquakes or other types of natural disasters or wars or other acts of violence) which may be uninsurable, or the cost of insuring against these losses may not be economically justifiable. If an uninsured loss occurs or a loss exceeds policy limits, NNN could lose both its invested capital and anticipated revenues from the property, thereby reducing NNN’s cash flow and asset value.
10
Acts of violence, terrorist attacks or war may affect the markets in which NNN operates and NNN’s results of operations.
Terrorist attacks or other acts of violence may negatively affect NNN’s operations. There can be no assurance that there will not be terrorist attacks against businesses within the United States. These attacks may directly or indirectly impact NNN’s physical facilities or the businesses or the financial condition of its tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or financial institutions with which NNN has a relationship. The United States is engaged in armed conflict, which could have an impact on these parties. The consequences of armed conflict are unpredictable, and NNN may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on its business or be insured for such.
More generally, any of these events or threats of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and worldwide financial markets and economies. They also could result in, or cause a deepening of, economic recession in the United States or abroad. Any of these occurrences could have an adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition or results of operations.
Vacant properties or bankrupt tenants could adversely affect NNN’s business or financial condition.
As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN owned
29
vacant, un-leased Properties, which accounted for approximately
one
percent of total Properties. NNN is actively marketing these properties for sale or lease but may not be able to sell or lease these properties on favorable terms or at all. The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from the rejection by any bankrupt tenant of any of their respective leases with NNN could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations of NNN if NNN is unable to re-lease the Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of
February 13, 2015
, less than
one
percent of the total gross leasable area of the Property Portfolio was leased to tenants that have filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and have the right to reject or affirm their leases with NNN.
The amount of debt NNN has and the restrictions imposed by that debt could adversely affect NNN’s business and financial condition.
As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN had outstanding debt including mortgages payable of
$26,339,000
, total unsecured notes payable of
$1,714,715,000
and
zero
outstanding on the Credit Facility. NNN’s organizational documents do not limit the level or amount of debt that it may incur. If NNN incurs additional indebtedness and permits a higher degree of leverage, debt service requirements would increase and could adversely affect NNN’s financial condition and results of operations, as well as NNN’s ability to pay principal and interest on the outstanding indebtedness or cash dividends to its stockholders. In addition, increased leverage could increase the risk that NNN may default on its debt obligations.
The amount of debt outstanding at any time could have important consequences to NNN’s stockholders. For example, it could:
•
require NNN to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, real estate investments and other business opportunities that may arise in the future,
•
increase NNN’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions,
•
limit NNN’s ability to obtain any additional financing it may need in the future for working capital, debt refinancing, capital expenditures, real estate investments, development or other general corporate purposes,
•
make it difficult to satisfy NNN’s debt service requirements,
•
limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends in cash on its outstanding common and preferred stock,
•
limit NNN’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the factors that affect the profitability of its business, and
•
limit NNN’s flexibility in conducting its business, which may place NNN at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt or debt with less restrictive terms.
NNN’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal or interest on its debt, or to retire or refinance such debt will depend primarily on its future performance, which to a certain extent is subject to the creditworthiness of its tenants, competition, and economic, financial, and other factors beyond its control. There can be no assurance that NNN’s business will continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service its debt or meet its other cash needs. If NNN is unable to generate sufficient cash flow from its business, it may be required to refinance all or a portion of its existing debt, sell assets or obtain additional financing to meet its debt obligations and other cash needs.
NNN cannot assure stockholders that any such refinancing, sale of assets or additional financing would be possible or, if possible, on terms and conditions, including but not limited to the interest rate, which NNN would find acceptable or would not result in a material decline in earnings.
11
NNN is obligated to comply with financial and other covenants in its debt instruments that could restrict its operating activities, and the failure to comply with such covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment of such debt.
As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN had approximately
$1,741,054,000
of outstanding indebtedness, of which approximately
$26,339,000
was secured indebtedness. NNN’s unsecured debt instruments contain various restrictive covenants which include, among others, provisions restricting NNN’s ability to:
•
incur or guarantee additional debt,
•
make certain distributions, investments and other restricted payments,
•
enter into transactions with certain affiliates,
•
create certain liens,
•
consolidate, merge or sell NNN’s assets, and
•
pre-pay debt.
NNN’s secured debt instruments generally contain customary covenants, including, among others, provisions:
•
requiring the maintenance of the property securing the debt,
•
restricting its ability to sell, assign or further encumber the properties securing the debt,
•
restricting its ability to incur additional debt on the property securing the debt,
•
restricting its ability to amend or modify existing leases on the property securing the debt, and
•
establishing certain prepayment restrictions.
In addition, NNN’s debt instruments may contain cross-default provisions, in which case a default of NNN under one debt instrument will be a default of NNN under multiple or all debt instruments of NNN.
NNN’s ability to meet some of its debt covenants, including covenants related to the condition of the property or payment of real estate taxes, may be dependent on the performance by NNN’s tenants under their leases.
In addition, certain covenants in NNN’s debt instruments, including its Credit Facility, require NNN, among other things, to:
•
limit certain leverage ratios,
•
maintain certain minimum interest and debt service coverage ratios, and
•
limit investments in certain types of assets.
NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.
The market value of NNN’s equity and debt securities is subject to various factors that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility.
As with other publicly traded securities, the market price of NNN’s equity and debt securities depends on various factors, which may change from time-to-time and/or may be unrelated to NNN’s financial condition, operating performance or prospects that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility in such prices. These factors, among others, include:
•
general economic and financial market conditions,
•
level and trend of interest rates,
•
NNN’s ability to access the capital markets to raise additional capital,
•
the issuance of additional equity or debt securities,
•
changes in NNN’s funds from operations or earnings estimates,
•
changes in NNN’s debt ratings or analyst ratings,
•
NNN’s financial condition and performance,
•
market perception of NNN compared to other REITs, and
•
market perception of REITs compared to other investment sectors.
12
NNN’s failure to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes could result in significant tax liability.
NNN intends to operate in a manner that will allow NNN to continue to qualify as a REIT. NNN believes it has been organized as, and its past and present operations qualify NNN as a REIT. However, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) could successfully assert that NNN is not qualified as such. In addition, NNN may not remain qualified as a REIT in the future. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within NNN’s control. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for NNN to qualify as a REIT or avoid significant tax liability.
If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT, it would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to stockholders in computing taxable income and would become subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. In this event, NNN could be subject to potentially significant tax liabilities and penalties. Unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, NNN would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the qualification was lost.
Even if NNN remains qualified as a REIT, NNN faces other tax liabilities that reduce operating results and cash flow.
Even if NNN remains qualified for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease earnings and cash available for distribution to stockholders. In addition, in order to meet the REIT qualification requirements, NNN holds some of its assets through the TRS.
Adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes could reduce NNN’s earnings, cash flow and market price of NNN’s common stock.
At any time, the federal and state income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may change. Any such changes may have retroactive effect, and could adversely affect NNN or its stockholders. Legislation could cause shares in non-REIT corporations to be a more attractive investment to individual investors than shares in REITs, and could have an adverse effect on the value of NNN’s common stock.
Compliance with REIT requirements, including distribution requirements, may limit NNN’s flexibility and negatively affect NNN’s operating decisions.
To maintain its status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, NNN must meet certain requirements on an on-going basis, including requirements regarding its sources of income, the nature and diversification of its assets, the amounts NNN distributes to its stockholders and the ownership of its shares. NNN may also be required to make distributions to its stockholders when it does not have funds readily available for distribution or at times when NNN’s funds are otherwise needed to fund expenditures or debt service requirements. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, so long as it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2014
, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.
Changes in accounting pronouncements could adversely impact NNN’s or NNN’s tenants’ reported financial performance.
Accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how NNN records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. From time to time the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the Commission, who create and interpret appropriate accounting standards, may change the financial accounting and reporting standards or their interpretation and application of these standards that govern the preparation of NNN’s financial statements. These changes could have a material impact on NNN’s reported financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, NNN could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in restating prior period financial statements. Similarly, these changes could have a material impact on NNN’s tenants’ reported financial condition or results of operations and affect their preferences regarding leasing real estate.
13
NNN’s failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results and share price.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. If NNN fails to maintain the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting, as such standards may be modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, NNN may not be able to ensure that it can conclude on an ongoing basis that it has effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Moreover, effective internal control over financial reporting, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for NNN to produce reliable financial reports and to maintain its qualification as a REIT and are important in helping to prevent financial fraud. If NNN cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its business and operating results could be harmed, REIT qualification could be jeopardized, investors could lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information, impair the company's access to capital, and the trading price of NNN’s shares could drop significantly.
NNN’s ability to pay dividends in the future is subject to many factors.
NNN’s ability to pay dividends may be impaired if any of the risks described in this section were to occur. In addition, payment of NNN’s dividends depends upon NNN’s earnings, financial condition, maintenance of NNN’s REIT status and other factors as NNN’s Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time.
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents could adversely affect NNN's business and disrupt operations and expose NNN to liabilities to tenants, employees, capital providers, and other third parties.
Cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. These incidents can include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents could include, but are not limited to, disrupted operations, misstated financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection costs, litigation and reputational damage adversely affecting customer or investor confidence. These cyber incidents could negatively impact NNN, NNN's tenants and/or the capital markets.
Future investment in international markets could subject NNN to additional risks.
If NNN expands its operating strategy to include investment in international markets, NNN could face additional risks, including foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, operational risks due to local economic and political conditions and laws and policies of the U.S. affecting foreign investment.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2.
Properties
Please refer to Item 1. “Business.”
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various legal actions that management believes are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
14
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The common stock of NNN currently is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “NNN.” Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on NNN’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity Index (“NAREIT”) and the S&P 500 Index (“S&P”) for the five year period commencing
December 31, 2009
and ending
December 31, 2014
. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on
December 31, 2009
.
Comparison to Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
Indexed Total Return
(As of December 31, 2014)
15
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on NNN’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity Index (“NAREIT”) and the S&P 500 Index (“S&P”) for the fifteen year period commencing December 31, 1999 and ending
December 31, 2014
. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 1999.
Comparison to Fifteen-Year Cumulative Total Return
Indexed Total Return
(As of December 31, 2014)
16
For each calendar quarter and year indicated, the following table reflects respective high, low and closing sales prices for the common stock as quoted by the NYSE and the dividends paid per share in each such period.
2014
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Year
High
$
36.35
$
37.65
$
38.04
$
40.49
$
40.49
Low
30.08
32.94
34.34
34.42
30.08
Close
34.32
37.19
34.57
39.37
39.37
Dividends paid per share
0.405
0.405
0.420
0.420
1.650
2013
High
$
36.18
$
41.98
$
37.74
$
35.51
$
41.98
Low
31.43
31.31
30.06
30.01
30.01
Close
36.17
34.40
31.82
30.33
30.33
Dividends paid per share
0.395
0.395
0.405
0.405
1.600
The following table presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:
2014
2013
Ordinary dividends
$
1.306992
79.2116
%
$
1.224568
76.5355
%
Qualified dividends
0.006212
0.3765
%
0.056784
3.5490
%
Capital gain
0.008603
0.5214
%
—
—
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain
0.015362
0.9310
%
0.000650
0.0406
%
Nontaxable distributions
0.312831
18.9595
%
0.317998
19.8749
%
$
1.650000
100.0000
%
$
1.600000
100.0000
%
NNN intends to pay regular quarterly dividends to its stockholders, although all future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, NNN’s financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.
In February 2015
, NNN paid dividends to its stockholders of
$55,314,000
, or
$0.42
per share, of common stock.
On January 30, 2015, there were 1,852 stockholders of record of NNN's common stock.
In February 2015, NNN declared a dividend on its Series D and E Preferred Stock of
41.40625
and
35.62500
cents per depositary share, respectively, payable March 16, 2015.
17
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
Historical Financial Highlights
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Gross revenues
(1)
$
435,248
$
397,006
$
342,059
$
271,696
$
237,062
Earnings from continuing operations
179,777
154,006
132,388
84,463
64,231
Earnings including noncontrolling interests
191,170
160,085
141,937
92,416
73,353
Net earnings attributable to NNN
190,601
160,145
142,015
92,325
72,997
Total assets
4,926,714
4,454,523
3,988,026
3,435,043
2,713,575
Total debt
1,741,054
1,570,059
1,586,964
1,339,109
1,133,685
Total stockholders’ equity
3,082,515
2,777,045
2,296,285
2,002,498
1,527,483
Cash dividends declared to:
Common stockholders
204,157
189,107
167,495
133,720
125,391
Series C preferred stockholders
—
—
1,979
6,785
6,785
Series D preferred stockholders
19,047
19,047
15,449
—
—
Series E preferred stockholders
16,387
8,876
—
—
—
Weighted average common shares:
Basic
124,257,558
118,204,148
106,965,156
88,100,076
82,715,645
Diluted
124,710,226
119,864,824
109,117,515
88,837,057
82,849,362
Per share information:
Earnings from continuing operations:
Basic
$
1.24
$
1.06
$
1.04
$
0.88
$
0.69
Diluted
1.24
1.05
1.02
0.87
0.69
Net earnings:
Basic
1.24
1.11
1.13
0.96
0.80
Diluted
1.24
1.10
1.11
0.96
0.80
Cash dividends declared to:
Common stockholders
1.65
1.60
1.56
1.53
1.51
Series C preferred depositary stockholders
—
—
0.537760
1.843750
1.843750
Series D preferred depositary stockholders
1.656250
1.656250
1.343403
—
—
Series E preferred depositary stockholders
1.425000
0.771875
—
—
—
Other data:
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities
$
296,733
$
274,421
$
228,130
$
177,728
$
187,914
Investing activities
(541,558
)
(568,040
)
(601,759
)
(752,068
)
(220,260
)
Financing activities
253,944
293,028
373,623
574,374
19,169
Funds from operations – available to common stockholders
(2)
260,977
229,518
193,682
139,834
108,625
(1)
Gross revenues include revenues from NNN’s continuing and discontinued operations. Prior to January 1, 2014, in accordance with FASB guidance on Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, NNN classified the revenues related to (i) all Properties which generated revenue that were sold and a leasehold interest which expired and (ii) all Properties which generated revenue and were held for sale at December 31, 2013, as discontinued operations. Effective January 1, 2014, NNN has early adopted ASU 2014-08. Therefore, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations are to be presented as discontinued operations. This requires the Company to continue to classify any Property disposal or Property classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013, as discontinued operations prospectively.
(2)
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) developed Funds from Operations (“FFO”) as a relative non-GAAP financial measure of performance of a REIT in order to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). FFO is defined by NAREIT and is used by NNN as follows: net earnings (computed in accordance with GAAP) plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets,
18
excluding gains (or including losses) on the disposition of certain assets, any impairment charges on a depreciable real estate asset and NNN’s share of these items from NNN’s unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Funds From Operations (FFO) Reconciliation
FFO is generally considered by industry analysts to be an appropriate measure of operating performance of real estate companies. FFO does not necessarily represent cash provided by operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of NNN’s operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Management considers FFO an appropriate measure of operating performance of an equity REIT because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of the real estate assets diminishes
predictably over time, and because industry analysts have accepted it as an operating performance measure. NNN’s computation of FFO may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO used by other equity REITs, and therefore, may not be comparable to such other REITs.
The following table reconciles FFO to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net earnings for the years ended December 31:
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Reconciliation of funds from operations:
Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders
$
190,601
$
160,145
$
142,015
$
92,325
$
72,997
Series C preferred stock dividends
—
—
(1,979
)
(6,785
)
(6,785
)
Series D preferred stock dividends
(19,047
)
(19,047
)
(15,449
)
—
—
Series E preferred stock dividends
(16,387
)
(8,876
)
—
—
—
Excess of redemption value over carrying value of Series C preferred shares redeemed
—
—
(3,098
)
—
—
Net earnings available to common stockholders
155,167
132,222
121,489
85,540
66,212
Real estate depreciation and amortization:
Continuing operations
115,888
99,048
73,685
52,270
41,680
Discontinued operations
3
343
1,381
1,866
2,129
Joint venture real estate depreciation
—
—
112
176
178
Joint venture gain on disposition of real estate
—
—
(2,341
)
—
—
Gain on disposition of real estate, net of tax and noncontrolling interest
(10,904
)
(5,442
)
(10,956
)
(449
)
(1,574
)
Impairment losses – real estate
823
3,347
10,312
431
—
FFO available to common stockholders
$
260,977
$
229,518
$
193,682
$
139,834
$
108,625
For a discussion of material events affecting the comparability of the information reflected in the selected financial data, refer to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
19
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with “Item 6. Selected Financial Data,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the forward-looking disclaimer language in italics before “Item 1. Business.”
The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”
Overview
NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. NNN's assets include: real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable, and commercial mortgage residual interests. NNN acquires, owns, invests in and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Properties” or “Property Portfolio,” or each individually, a "Property").
As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN owned
2,054
Properties, with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately
22,479,000
square feet, located in
47
states, with a weighted average remaining lease term of
12
years. Approximately
99
percent of the Properties were leased as of
December 31, 2014
.
NNN’s management team focuses on certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN include items such as: the composition of the Property Portfolio (such as tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of the Property Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios and profitability measures, and industry trends and performance compared to that of NNN.
NNN reviews the creditworthiness of its current and prospective tenants. This evaluation includes reviewing available financial statements, press releases, public credit ratings from major credit rating agencies, industry news publications, financial market data (debt and equity pricing), and developing a thorough understanding of the tenant's business and operations, including periodically meeting with senior management of certain tenants.
NNN continues to maintain its diversification by tenant, geography and tenant’s line of trade. NNN’s highest lines of trade concentrations are the convenience store and restaurant (including full and limited service) sectors. These sectors represent a large part of the freestanding retail property marketplace and NNN’s management believes these sectors present attractive investment opportunities. The Property Portfolio is geographically concentrated in the south and southeast United States, which are regions of historically above-average population growth. Given these concentrations, any financial hardship within these sectors or geographic locations, respectively, could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and operating performance of NNN.
As of the years ended December 31,
2014
,
2013
and
2012
, the Property Portfolio has remained at least
98
percent leased. The average remaining lease term of the Property Portfolio was
12
years, and has remained fairly constant over the past three years which, coupled with its net lease structure, provides enhanced probability of maintaining occupancy and operating earnings.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements in conformance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates on assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as other disclosures in the financial statements. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and assumptions; however, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, which in turn could have a material impact on NNN’s financial statements. A summary of NNN’s accounting policies and procedures are included in Note 1 of NNN’s consolidated financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements.
Real Estate Portfolio.
NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed or funded by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.
Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease
. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated
20
to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases, and based in each case on their fair values. Acquisition and closing costs incurred on the acquisition of real estate with an in-place lease is expensed as incurred and recorded as real estate acquisition costs.
Impairment – Real Estate.
Based upon certain events or changes in circumstances, management periodically assesses its Properties for possible impairment whenever the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions or the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying value of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value. Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell.
Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, at Fair Value
. Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value.
Revenue Recognition
. Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant. Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance on accounting for leases, based on the terms of the lease of the leased asset.
NNN's real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the Property, generally including property taxes, insurance, maintenance, utilities, repairs and capital expenditures. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:
Operating method
– Properties with leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rental revenue varies during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.
Direct financing method
– Properties with leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the Property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.
New Accounting Pronouncements.
Refer to Note 1 of the
December 31, 2014
, Consolidated Financial Statements.
Use of Estimates.
Additional critical accounting policies of NNN include management’s estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Additional critical accounting policies include management’s estimates of the useful lives used in calculating depreciation expense relating to real estate assets, the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including the commercial mortgage residual interests, the recoverability of the income tax benefit, and the collectibility of receivables from tenants, including accrued rental income. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
21
Results of Operations
Property Analysis
General.
The following table summarizes the Property Portfolio as of December 31:
2014
2013
2012
Properties Owned:
Number
2,054
1,860
1,622
Total gross leasable area (square feet)
22,479,000
20,402,000
19,168,000
Properties:
Leased or operated, and unimproved land
2,025
1,827
1,588
Percent of Properties – leased or operated, and unimproved land
99
%
98
%
98
%
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
12
12
12
Total gross leasable area (square feet) – leased or operated
21,938,000
19,872,000
18,524,000
The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of the Property Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of
December 31, 2014
:
% of
Annual
Base Rent
(1)
# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
% of
Annual
Base Rent
(1)
# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
2015
1.2%
30
384,000
2021
4.4%
102
1,005,000
2016
1.5%
31
558,000
2022
6.4%
95
1,171,000
2017
3.2%
49
1,074,000
2023
3.0%
55
946,000
2018
6.9%
182
1,643,000
2024
2.9%
50
771,000
2019
3.4%
74
1,030,000
Thereafter
63.2%
1,236
11,950,000
2020
3.9%
112
1,406,000
(1)
Based on the annualized base rent for all leases in place as of
December 31, 2014
.
(2)
Approximate square feet.
The following table summarizes the diversification of the Property Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:
% of Annual Base Rent
(1)
Top 10 Lines of Trade
2014
2013
2012
1.
Convenience stores
18.0%
19.7%
19.8%
2.
Restaurants - full service
9.1%
9.7%
10.7%
3.
Automotive service
7.2%
7.6%
7.6%
4.
Restaurants - limited service
6.5%
5.5%
5.2%
5.
Theaters
5.2%
4.5%
4.7%
6.
Family entertainment centers
5.1%
2.3%
2.1%
7.
Automotive parts
4.7%
5.1%
5.6%
8.
Health and fitness
3.9%
4.3%
3.7%
9.
Banks
3.7%
4.1%
0.2%
10.
Sporting goods
3.5%
3.7%
4.0%
Other
33.1%
33.5%
36.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
(1)
Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.
22
The following table summarizes the diversification of the Property Portfolio by state as of
December 31, 2014
:
State
# of Properties
% of Annual Base Rent
(1)
1.
Texas
419
20.4%
2.
Florida
168
9.7%
3.
North Carolina
130
5.5%
4.
Illinois
71
5.0%
5.
Georgia
109
4.9%
6.
Virginia
87
4.2%
7.
Indiana
84
4.0%
8.
Ohio
60
3.3%
9.
Pennsylvania
99
3.3%
10.
California
40
3.1%
Other
787
36.6%
2,054
100.0%
(1)
Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of
December 31, 2014
.
Property Acquisitions.
The following table summarizes the Property acquisitions for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Acquisitions:
Number of Properties
221
275
232
Gross leasable area (square feet)
2,417,000
1,652,000
2,955,000
Initial cash yield
7.5
%
7.8
%
8.3
%
Total dollars invested
(1)
$
618,145
$
629,896
$
707,233
(1)
Includes dollars invested in projects under construction or tenant improvements for each respective year.
NNN typically funds Property acquisitions either through borrowings under NNN's unsecured revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") or by issuing its debt or equity securities in the capital markets.
Property Dispositions.
The following table summarizes the Properties sold by NNN for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Number of properties
27
35
34
Gross leasable area (square feet)
317,000
360,000
211,000
Net sales proceeds
$
55,378
$
61,000
$
81,120
Gain, net of income tax expense
(1)
$
11,424
$
5,595
$
10,956
Cap rate
7.2
%
7.5
%
8.2
%
(1)
Amounts include deferred gains on previously sold properties.
NNN typically uses the proceeds from Property sales either to pay down the Credit Facility or reinvest in real estate.
23
Analysis of Revenue from Continuing Operations
General.
During the year ended
December 31, 2014
, NNN’s rental income increased primarily due to the increase in rental income from Property acquisitions (See “Results of Operations – Property Analysis – Property Acquisitions”). NNN anticipates increases in rental income will continue to come from additional Property acquisitions and increases in rents pursuant to existing lease terms.
The following summarizes NNN’s revenues from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Percent of Total
2014
Versus
2013
Percent
2013
Versus
2012
Percent
2014
2013
2012
Rental Income
(1)
$
416,842
$
376,424
$
315,913
95.9
%
95.6
%
95.0
%
10.7
%
19.2
%
Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants
13,875
13,340
11,817
3.2
%
3.4
%
3.5
%
4.0
%
12.9
%
Interest and other income from real estate transactions
2,296
1,471
2,243
0.5
%
0.4
%
0.7
%
56.1
%
(34.4
)%
Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests
1,834
2,290
2,673
0.4
%
0.6
%
0.8
%
(19.9
)%
(14.3
)%
Total revenues from continuing operations
$
434,847
$
393,525
$
332,646
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
10.5
%
18.3
%
(1)
Includes rental income from operating leases, earned income from direct financing leases and percentage rent from continuing operations (“Rental Income”).
Comparison of Revenues from Continuing Operations – 2014 versus 2013
Rental Income.
Rental Income increased in amount and as a percent of the total revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2013. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2014, is primarily due to a partial year of Rental Income received as a result of the acquisition of 221 properties with aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 2,417,000 during 2014 and a full year of Rental Income received as a result of the acquisition of 275 properties with a gross leasable area of approximately 1,652,000 square feet in 2013. In addition, the increase was partially offset by a $613,000 decrease in lease termination fees for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to December 31, 2013.
Real Estate Expense Reimbursement from Tenants.
Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants increased for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the same period in 2013, but decreased as a percentage of total revenues from continuing operations for the same period. The increase is primarily attributable to a full year of reimbursements from properties acquired in 2013 and a partial year of reimbursements from certain newly acquired properties in 2014.
Comparison of Revenues from Continuing Operations – 2013 versus 2012
Rental Income.
Rental Income increased in amount and as a percent of the total revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2013, is primarily due to a partial year of Rental Income received as a result of the acquisition of 275 properties with aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 1,652,000 square feet during 2013 and a full year of Rental Income received as a result of the acquisition of 232 properties with a gross leasable area of approximately 2,955,000 square feet in 2012. In addition, lease termination fees increased $597,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to December 31, 2012.
Real Estate Expense Reimbursement from Tenants.
Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants increased for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012, but decreased as a percentage of total revenues from continuing operations. The increase is primarily attributable to a full year of reimbursements from properties acquired in 2012 and a partial year of reimbursements from certain newly acquired properties in 2013.
24
Analysis of Expenses from Continuing Operations
General.
Operating expenses from continuing operations increased primarily due to an increase in depreciation expense and an increase in general and administrative expense, but was partially offset by a decrease in impairments during the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the same period in 2013. The following summarizes NNN’s expenses from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
General and administrative
$
32,518
$
31,095
$
31,828
Real estate
18,905
18,497
17,425
Depreciation and amortization
116,162
99,274
73,806
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation
256
1,185
2,812
Impairment losses and other charges, net of recoveries
760
3,580
3,899
Total operating expenses
$
168,601
$
153,631
$
129,770
Interest and other income
$
(357
)
$
(1,493
)
$
(2,232
)
Interest expense
85,510
85,822
83,787
Real estate acquisition costs
1,391
1,485
364
Total other expenses (revenues)
$
86,544
$
85,814
$
81,919
Percentage of Total
Operating Expenses
Percentage of
Revenues from
Continuing Operations
2014
Versus
2013
Percent
2013
Versus
2012
Percent
2014
2013
2012
2014
2013
2012
General and administrative
19.3
%
20.3
%
24.5
%
7.5
%
7.9
%
9.6
%
4.6
%
(2.3
)%
Real estate
11.2
%
12.0
%
13.4
%
4.3
%
4.7
%
5.2
%
2.2
%
6.2
%
Depreciation and amortization
68.9
%
64.6
%
56.9
%
26.7
%
25.2
%
22.2
%
17.0
%
34.5
%
Impairment – commercial mortgage
residual interests valuation
0.2
%
0.8
%
2.2
%
0.1
%
0.3
%
0.8
%
(78.4
)%
(57.9
)%
Impairment losses and other
charges, net of recoveries
0.4
%
2.3
%
3.0
%
0.2
%
0.9
%
1.2
%
(78.8
)%
(8.2
)%
Total operating expenses
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
38.8
%
39.0
%
39.0
%
9.7
%
18.4
%
Interest and other income
(0.4
)%
(1.7
)%
(2.7
)%
(0.1
)%
(0.4
)%
(0.7
)%
(76.1
)%
(33.1
)%
Interest expense
98.8
%
100.0
%
102.3
%
19.7
%
21.8
%
25.2
%
(0.4
)%
2.4
%
Real estate acquisition costs
1.6
%
1.7
%
0.4
%
0.3
%
0.4
%
0.1
%
(6.3
)%
308.0
%
Total other expenses (revenues)
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
19.9
%
21.8
%
24.6
%
0.9
%
4.8
%
Comparison of Expenses from Continuing Operations – 2014 versus 2013
General and Administrative Expenses.
General and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the same period in 2013, but decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014, is primarily attributable to an increase in incentive compensation.
Real Estate.
Real estate expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the same period in 2013, but decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase is primarily due to the increase in tenant reimbursable expenses related to a partial year of reimbursable expenses from certain properties acquired in 2014 and a full year of reimbursable expenses from certain properties acquired in 2013. Additionally, real estate expenses incurred on vacant properties increased for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in real estate expenses that are not reimbursable by the tenant for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the same period in 2013.
25
Depreciation and Amortization.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased in amount and as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase in expenses is primarily due to the acquisition of 221 properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 2,417,000 square feet in 2014 and 275 properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 1,652,000 square feet during 2013.
Interest Expense.
Interest expense decreased for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the same period in 2013, and decreased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations and as a percentage of total operating expenses.
The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:
(i)
the issuance in April 2013 of $350,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a maturity of April 2023, and stated interest rate of 3.300%;
(ii)
the settlement of $223,035,000 principal amount of 5.125% convertible notes payable in 2013;
(iii)
the issuance in May 2014 of $350,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a maturity of June 2024, and stated interest rate of 3.900%;
(iv)
the repayment in June 2014 of $150,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a stated interest rate of 6.250%;
(v)
the assumption of a mortgage in September 2014 of $2,824,000 in connection with a Property acquisition with an interest rate of 6.400%;
(vi)
the assumption of a mortgage in November 2014 of $14,430,000 in connection with a Property acquisition with an interest rate of 5.230%; and
(vii)
the increase of $15,188,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to the same period in 2013.
Comparison of Expenses from Continuing Operations – 2013 versus 2012
General and Administrative Expenses.
General and administrative expenses decreased for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012, and decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013, is primarily attributable to a decrease in incentive compensation.
Real Estate.
Real estate expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012, but decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase is primarily due to the increase in tenant reimbursable expenses related to a partial year of reimbursable expenses from certain properties acquired in 2013 and a full year of reimbursable expenses from certain properties acquired in 2012. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in real estate expenses that are not reimbursable by the tenant and a decrease in real estate expenses incurred on vacant properties for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012.
Depreciation and Amortization.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased as a percentage of total operating expenses and increased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2012. The increase in expenses is primarily due to the acquisition of 275 properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 1,652,000 square feet in 2013 and 232 properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 2,955,000 square feet during 2012.
Interest Expense.
Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012, but decreased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations and as a percentage of total operating expenses.
The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:
(i)
the issuance in August 2012 of $325,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a maturity of October 2022, and stated interest rate of 3.800%;
(ii)
the repayment in June 2012 of $50,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a stated interest rate of 7.750%;
(iii)
the repayment in July 2012 of a mortgage, with a balance of $18,488,000 at December 31, 2011 and an interest rate of 6.900%;
26
(iv)
the settlement of $138,700,000 principal amount of 3.950% convertible notes payable, of which $123,163,000 was settled in the fourth quarter 2012 and the remaining $15,537,000 was settled in the first quarter 2013;
(v)
the issuance in April 2013 of $350,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a maturity of April 2023, and stated interest rate of 3.300%;
(vi)
the settlement of $223,035,000 principal amount of 5.125% convertible notes payable in 2013; and
(vii)
the decrease of $12,017,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2013, as compared to the same period in 2012.
Discontinued Operations
Earnings.
Effective January 1, 2014, NNN has early adopted the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-08. Under ASU 2014-08, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations are to be presented as discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 requires the Company to continue to classify any Property disposal or Property classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013, as discontinued operations prospectively. Therefore, the revenues and expenses related to these properties are presented as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2014. The Company did not classify any additional properties as discontinued operations subsequent to December 31, 2013.
The following table summarizes the earnings before income tax expense from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
# of Sold
Properties
Gain
Earnings
# of Sold
Properties
Gain
Earnings
# of Sold
Properties
Gain
Earnings
Properties
2
$
155
(1)
$
124
35
$
6,272
(1)
$
5,972
34
$
10,956
(1)
$
9,549
Noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
(152
)
(163
)
—
—
(24
)
2
$
155
$
124
35
$
6,120
$
5,809
34
$
10,956
$
9,525
(1)
Amount includes deferred gains on previously sold properties.
NNN periodically sells Properties and may reinvest the sales proceeds to purchase additional properties or pay down debt. NNN evaluates its ability to pay dividends to stockholders by considering the combined effect of income from continuing and discontinued operations.
Impairment Losses and Other Charges.
NNN periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions and the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Management evaluates whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, NNN recognized real estate impairments on discontinued operations of $63,000, $541,000 and $6,242,000, respectively.
Impact of Inflation
NNN’s leases typically contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on NNN’s results of operations. Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or, to a lesser extent, increases in the tenant’s sales volume. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent, rent increases will not keep up with the rate of inflation.
Properties are leased to tenants under long-term, net leases which typically require the tenant to pay certain operating expenses for a Property, thus, NNN’s exposure to inflation is reduced with respect to these expenses. Inflation may have an adverse impact on NNN’s tenants.
27
Liquidity
General
. NNN’s demand for funds has been and will continue to be primarily for (i) payment of operating expenses and cash dividends; (ii) Property acquisitions and development; (iii) origination of mortgages and notes receivable; (iv) capital expenditures; (v) payment of principal and interest on its outstanding indebtedness; and (vi) other investments.
NNN expects to meet short term liquidity requirements through cash provided from operations and NNN’s Credit Facility. As of
December 31, 2014
, there was
no
outstanding balance and
$650,000,000
was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility. NNN anticipates its long-term capital needs will be funded by the Credit Facility, cash provided from operations, the issuance of long-term debt or the issuance of common or preferred equity or other instruments convertible into or exchangeable for common or preferred equity. However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.
Cash and Cash Equivalents.
The table below summarizes NNN’s cash flows for each of the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Cash and cash equivalents:
Provided by operating activities
$
296,733
$
274,421
$
228,130
Used in investing activities
(541,558
)
(568,040
)
(601,759
)
Provided by financing activities
253,944
293,028
373,623
Increase (decrease)
9,119
(591
)
(6
)
Net cash at beginning of period
1,485
2,076
2,082
Net cash at end of period
$
10,604
$
1,485
$
2,076
Cash provided by operating activities represents cash received primarily from rental income from tenants, proceeds from the disposition of certain properties and interest income less cash used for general and administrative expenses, interest expense and acquisition of certain properties. NNN’s cash flow from operating activities, net of cash used in and provided by the acquisition and disposition of certain properties, has been sufficient to pay the distributions for each period presented. NNN typically uses proceeds from its Credit Facility to fund the acquisition of its properties. The change in cash provided by operations for the
years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
, is primarily the result of changes in revenues and expenses as discussed in “Results of Operations.” Cash generated from operations is expected to fluctuate in the future.
Changes in cash for investing activities are primarily attributable to acquisitions and dispositions of Properties.
NNN’s financing activities for the year ended December 31,
2014
, included the following significant transactions:
•
$46,400,000 in net payments to NNN's Credit Facility,
•
$346,068,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of the 3.90% notes payable in May,
•
$150,000,000 in repayment of the 6.25% notes payable in June,
•
$199,961,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of 5,462,500 shares of common stock in November,
•
$14,817,000
in net proceeds from the issuance of
422,406
shares of common stock in connection with the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”),
•
$134,919,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of 3,758,362 shares of common stock in connection with the at-the-market ("ATM") equity program,
•
$19,047,000
in dividends paid to holders of the depositary shares of NNN’s Series D Preferred Stock,
•
$
16,387,000
in dividends paid to holders of the depositary shares of NNN’s Series E Preferred Stock, and
•
$204,157,000
in dividends paid to common stockholders.
Financing Strategy.
NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategy while servicing its debt requirements, maintaining investment grade credit rating, staggering debt maturities and providing value to NNN’s stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, proceeds from the disposition of certain properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.
28
NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements, including investments in additional Properties, with cash from its Credit Facility. As of December 31,
2014
, there was
no
outstanding balance and
$650,000,000
was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility.
As of December 31,
2014
, NNN’s ratio of total debt to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation and amortization) was approximately
33
percent and the ratio of secured indebtedness to total gross assets was less than
one
percent. The ratio of total debt to total market capitalization was approximately
24
percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances. The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
. The information in the following table summarizes NNN’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31,
2014
. The table presents principal cash flows by year-end of the expected maturity for debt obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31,
2014
.
Expected Maturity Date (dollars in thousands)
Total
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter
Long-term debt
(1)
$
1,750,448
$
151,663
$
7,367
$
253,355
$
624
$
602
$
1,336,837
Operating lease
7,704
528
714
728
743
758
4,233
Total contractual cash obligations
(2)
$
1,758,152
$
152,191
$
8,081
$
254,083
$
1,367
$
1,360
$
1,341,070
(1)
Includes amounts outstanding under mortgages payable and notes payable and excludes unamortized mortgage premiums and note discounts.
(2)
Excludes $17,396 of accrued interest payable.
In addition to the contractual obligations outlined above, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments on leased Properties. The improvements are estimated to be completed within 12 months. These construction commitments, as of December 31,
2014
, are outlined in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Number of properties
26
Total commitment
(1)
$
110,081
Amount funded
$
57,465
Remaining commitment
$
52,616
(1)
Includes land, construction costs, tenant improvements and lease costs.
As of December 31,
2014
, NNN did not have any other material contractual cash obligations, such as purchase obligations, financing lease obligations or other long-term liabilities other than those reflected in the table. In addition to items reflected in the table, NNN has issued preferred stock with cumulative preferential cash distributions, as described below under “Dividends.”
Management anticipates satisfying these obligations with a combination of NNN’s cash provided from operations, current capital resources on hand, its Credit Facility, debt or equity financings and asset dispositions.
Generally the Properties are leased under long-term net leases. Therefore, management anticipates that capital demands to meet obligations with respect to these Properties will be modest for the foreseeable future and can be met with funds from operations and working capital. Certain of the Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for specific costs and expenses associated with the Property. Management anticipates the costs associated with the vacant Properties or those Properties that become vacant will also be met with funds from operations and working capital. NNN may be required to borrow under its Credit Facility or use other sources of capital in the event of significant capital expenditures.
The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from vacant Properties or uncollectibility of lease revenues could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations if NNN is unable to release the Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of December 31,
2014
, NNN owned
29
vacant, un-leased Properties which accounted for approximately
one
percent of total Properties. Additionally, as of
February 13, 2015
, less than
one
percent of the total gross leasable area of the Property Portfolio was leased to tenants that have filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result, these tenants have the right to reject or affirm their leases with NNN.
29
Dividends.
NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, as amended, and related regulations and intends to continue to operate so as to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost. Such an event could materially adversely affect NNN’s income and ability to pay dividends.
One of NNN’s primary objectives, consistent with its policy of retaining sufficient cash for reserves and working capital purposes and maintaining its status as a REIT, is to distribute a substantial portion of its funds available from operations to its stockholders in the form of dividends.
The following table outlines the dividends declared and paid for NNN's common stock for the years ended December 31 (in thousands, except per share data):
2014
2013
2012
Dividends
$
204,157
$
189,107
$
167,495
Per share
1.650
1.600
1.560
The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:
2014
2013
2012
Ordinary dividends
$
1.306992
79.2116
%
$
1.224568
76.5355
%
$
1.199003
76.8592
%
Qualified dividends
0.006212
0.3765
%
0.056784
3.5490
%
0.013346
0.8555
%
Capital gain
0.008603
0.5214
%
—
—
0.021358
1.3691
%
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain
0.015362
0.9310
%
0.000650
0.0406
%
0.048890
3.1340
%
Nontaxable distributions
0.312831
18.9595
%
0.317998
19.8749
%
0.277403
17.7822
%
$
1.650000
100.0000
%
$
1.600000
100.0000
%
$
1.560000
100.0000
%
In February 2015
, NNN paid dividends to its common stockholders of
$55,314,000
, or
$0.42
per share of common stock.
Holders of NNN’s preferred stock issuances are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash distributions based on the stated rate and liquidation preference per annum. The following table outlines the dividends declared and paid for NNN's preferred stock for the years ended December 31(in thousands, except per share data):
2014
2013
2012
Series C Preferred Stock
(1)
:
Dividends
$
—
$
—
$
1,979
Per share
—
—
0.537760
Series D Preferred Stock
(2)
:
Dividends
19,047
19,047
15,449
Per share
1.656250
1.656250
1.343403
Series E Preferred Stock
(3)
:
Dividends
16,387
8,876
—
Per share
1.425000
0.771875
—
(1)
The Series C Preferred Stock was redeemed in March 2012. The dividends paid during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 include accumulated and unpaid dividends through the redemption date.
(2)
The Series D Preferred Stock dividends paid during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 include accumulated and unpaid dividends from the issuance date through the declaration date. The Series D Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.
30
(3)
The Series E Preferred Stock dividends paid during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 include accumulated and unpaid dividends from the issuance date through the declaration date. The Series E Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.
The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such preferred stock dividends for the years ended December 31:
2014
2013
2012
Series E
Series D
Percentage of Total
Series E
(3)
Series D
Percentage of Total
Series D
(2)
Series C
(1)
Percentage of Total
Ordinary dividends
$
1.393700
$
1.619870
97.8035
%
$
0.741150
$
1.590323
96.0195
%
$
1.255844
$
0.502710
93.4823
%
Qualified dividends
0.005738
0.006670
0.4027
%
0.030332
0.065084
3.9296
%
0.013979
0.005596
1.0406
%
Capital gain
0.009177
0.010666
0.6440
%
—
—
—
0.022371
0.008956
1.6652
%
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain
0.016385
0.019044
1.1498
%
0.000393
0.000843
0.0509
%
0.051209
0.020498
3.8119
%
$
1.425000
$
1.656250
100.0000
%
$
0.771875
$
1.656250
100.0000
%
$
1.343403
$
0.537760
100.0000
%
(1)
The Series C preferred stock was redeemed in March 2012.
(2)
The Series D preferred stock was issued in February 2012.
(3)
The Series E preferred stock was issued in May 2013.
In February
2015
, NNN declared a dividend on its Series D and E Preferred Stock of
41.40625
and
35.62500
cents per depositary share, respectively, payable March 16,
2015
.
Capital Resources
Generally, cash needs for Property acquisitions, mortgages and notes receivable investments, debt payments, capital expenditures, development and other investments have been funded by equity and debt offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties and, to a lesser extent, by internally generated funds. Cash needs for operating and interest expenses and dividends have generally been funded by internally generated funds. If available, future sources of capital include proceeds from the public or private offering of NNN’s debt or equity securities, secured or unsecured borrowings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties, as well as undistributed funds from operations.
Debt
The following is a summary of NNN’s total outstanding debt as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2014
Percentage
of Total
2013
Percentage
of Total
Line of credit payable
$
—
—
$
46,400
3.0
%
Mortgages payable
26,339
1.5
%
9,475
0.6
%
Notes payable
1,714,715
98.5
%
1,514,184
96.4
%
Total outstanding debt
$
1,741,054
100.0
%
$
1,570,059
100.0
%
Indebtedness.
NNN expects to use indebtedness primarily for property acquisitions and development of single-tenant retail properties, either directly or through investment interests, and mortgages and notes receivable. Additionally indebtedness may be used to refinance existing indebtedness.
Line of Credit Payable.
In October 2014, NNN amended and restated its credit agreement increasing the borrowing capacity under its unsecured revolving credit facility from $
500,000,000
to
$650,000,000
and amended certain other terms under the former revolving credit facility (as the context requires, the previous and new revolving credit facility, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility had a weighted average outstanding balance of
$56,590,000
and a weighted average interest rate of
1.2%
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
. The Credit Facility matures
January 2019
, with an option to extend maturity to
January 2020
. As of
December 31, 2014
, the Credit Facility bears interest at
LIBOR plus 92.5
basis points; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN's debt rating. The Credit Facility also includes an
31
accordion feature to increase the facility size up to
$1,000,000,000
. As of
December 31, 2014
, there was
no
outstanding balance and
$650,000,000
was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility.
In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage, and (iv) investment limitations. At
December 31, 2014
, NNN was in compliance with those covenants. In the event that NNN violates any of these restrictive financial covenants, it could cause the indebtedness under the Credit Facility to be accelerated and may impair NNN’s access to the debt and equity markets and limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends to its common and preferred stockholders, each of which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations.
Mortgages Payable.
The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):
Entered
(1)
Initial Balance
Interest
Rate
Maturity
(2)
Carrying
Value of
Encumbered
Asset(s)
(3)
Outstanding Principal
Balance at December 31,
2014
2013
December 2001
$
623
9.00%
April 2014
$
—
$
—
$
27
December 2001
698
9.00%
April 2019
868
223
263
December 2001
485
9.00%
April 2019
841
116
136
February 2004
6,952
6.90%
January 2017
10,554
1,577
2,257
March 2005
1,015
8.14%
September 2016
1,245
222
335
June 2012
(4)
6,850
5.75%
April 2016
8,529
6,180
6,457
September 2014
(4)
2,957
6.40%
February 2017
3,797
2,922
—
November 2014
(4)
15,151
5.23%
July 2023
22,376
15,099
—
$
48,210
$
26,339
$
9,475
(1)
Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan.
(2)
Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.
(3)
Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of the Properties. The carrying values of the assets are as of
December 31, 2014
.
(4)
Initial balance and outstanding principal balance includes unamortized premium.
32
Notes Payable.
Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes is summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Notes
(1)
Issue Date
Principal
Discount
(2)
Net
Price
Stated
Rate
Effective
Rate
(3)
Maturity
Date
2015
(7)
November 2005
$
150,000
$
390
$
149,610
6.150%
6.185%
December 2015
2017
(4)
September 2007
250,000
877
249,123
6.875%
6.924%
October 2017
2021
(5)
July 2011
300,000
4,269
295,731
5.500%
5.690%
July 2021
2022
August 2012
325,000
4,989
320,011
3.800%
3.984%
October 2022
2023
(6)
April 2013
350,000
2,594
347,406
3.300%
3.388%
April 2023
2024
(8)
May 2014
350,000
707
349,293
3.900%
3.924%
June 2024
(1)
The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility.
(2)
The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.
(3)
Includes the effects of the discount, treasury lock gain/loss and swap gain/loss, as applicable.
(4)
NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of $3,260, of which $3,228 was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.
(5)
NNN entered into two interest rate hedges with a total notional amount of $150,000. Upon issuance of the 2021 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreements resulting in a liability of $5,300, of which $5,218 was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the 2021 Notes using the effective interest method.
(6)
NNN entered into four forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of
$240,000
. Upon issuance of the 2023 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a liability of
$3,156
, of which
$3,141
was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the note using the effective interest method.
(7)
NNN plans to use proceeds from the Credit Facility and/or potential debt or equity offerings to repay the outstanding indebtedness.
(8)
NNN entered into three forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of
$225,000
. Upon issuance of the 2024 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a liability of
$6,312
, which was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the note using the effective interest method.
Each series of notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and is subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. The notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.
In connection with the note offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling
$15,500,000
consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.
In accordance with the terms of the indentures, pursuant to which NNN’s notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios, and (ii) certain interest coverage. At
December 31, 2014
, NNN was in compliance with those covenants. NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.
In
June 2014
, NNN repaid the
$150,000,000
6.250%
notes payable that were due in
June 2014
.
Debt and Equity Securities
NNN has used, and expects to use in the future, issuances of debt and equity securities primarily to pay down its outstanding indebtedness and to finance investment acquisitions. In February 2012, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) which was automatically effective and permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities.
A description of NNN’s outstanding series of publicly held notes is found under “Debt – Notes Payable” above.
33
NNN completed the following underwritten public offerings of cumulative redeemable preferred stock that are still outstanding ("Preferred Stock Shares") (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
Series
Dividend Rate
(1)
Issued
Depositary Shares Outstanding
(2)
Gross Proceeds
Stock Issuance Costs
(3)
Dividend Per Depositary Share
Earliest Redemption Date
(4)
Series D
(5)
6.625
%
February 2012
11,500,000
$
287,500
$
9,855
$
1.656250
February 2017
Series E
(6)
5.700
%
May 2013
11,500,000
287,500
9,856
1.425000
May 2018
(1)
Holders are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends.
(2)
Representing 1/100th of a preferred share. Each issuance included 1,500,000 depositary shares in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment.
(3)
Consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, rating agency fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.
(4)
NNN may redeem the preferred stock underlying the depositary shares at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends.
(5)
NNN used the net proceeds to redeem the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock for an aggregate redemption price of $92,000, excluding accumulated dividends of $283. NNN used the remainder of the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including repaying outstanding indebtedness under its Credit Facility.
(6)
NNN used the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes and funding property acquisitions.
The Preferred Stock Shares underlying the depositary shares rank senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Preferred Stock Shares have no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. In addition, upon a change of control, as defined in the articles supplementary fixing the rights and preferences of the Preferred Stock Shares, NNN may redeem the Preferred Stock Shares underlying the depositary shares at a redemption price of
$2,500.00
per share (or
$25.00
per depositary share), plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends, and in limited circumstances the holders of depositary shares may convert some or all of their Preferred Stock Shares into shares of NNN's common stock at conversion rates provided in the related articles supplementary. As of
February 20, 2015
, the Preferred Stock Shares were not redeemable or convertible.
Common Stock Issuances.
In November 2014, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2012 shelf registration statement and issued
5,462,500
shares (including
712,500
shares in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment) of common stock at a price of
$38.16
per share and received net proceeds of
$199,961,000
. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately
$8,488,000
, consisting primarily of underwriters' fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses. The Company used the net proceeds from this offering to repay outstanding indebtedness under the Credit Facility, to fund property acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
In May 2012, NNN established an ATM equity program ("2012 ATM") which allows NNN to sell up to an aggregate of 9,000,000 shares of common stock from time to time through May 2015, of which 8,958,840 have been issued as of December 31, 2014. The 2012 ATM will expire in accordance with its terms in May 2015. NNN used the net proceeds from the 2012 ATM to repay outstanding indebtedness under the Credit Facility, to finance NNN's potential development and acquisition activities and for other general corporate purposes. The following table outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the 2012 ATM for the year ended December 31 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
2013
2012
Shares of common stock
4,676,542
4,282,298
Average price per share (net)
$
32.60
$
29.64
Net proceeds
152,435
126,947
Stock issuance costs
(1)
2,161
2,145
(1)
Stock issuance costs consist primarily of underwriters' fees and commissions, and legal and accounting fees.
34
There were no common stock issuances pursuant to the 2012 ATM for the year ended December 31, 2014.
In March 2013, NNN established a second ATM equity program ("2013 ATM") which allows NNN to sell up to an aggregate of 9,000,000 shares of common stock from time to time through March 2015, of which
6,038,812
have been issued as of December 31, 2014. The 2013 ATM will expire in accordance with its terms in March 2015. NNN used the net proceeds from the 2013 ATM to repay outstanding indebtedness under the Credit Facility, to finance NNN's potential development and acquisition activities and for other general corporate purposes. The following table outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the 2013 ATM for the year ended December 31 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
2014
2013
Shares of common stock
3,758,362
2,280,450
Average price per share (net)
$
35.90
$
37.80
Net proceeds
134,919
86,208
Stock issuance costs
(1)
2,195
1,613
(1)
Stock issuance costs consist primarily of underwriters' fees and commissions, and legal and accounting fees.
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.
In February 2012, NNN filed a shelf registration statement which was automatically effective, with the Commission for its DRIP, which permits the issuance by NNN of 16,000,000 shares of common stock. NNN’s DRIP provides an economical and convenient way for current stockholders and other interested new investors to invest in NNN’s common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to NNN’s DRIP for the year ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Shares of common stock
422,406
764,891
2,101,644
Net proceeds
$
14,817
$
25,407
$
56,102
The proceeds from the issuances were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness under NNN’s Credit Facility.
Mortgages and Notes Receivable
Mortgage notes are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
Mortgages and notes receivable
$
10,974
$
16,942
Accrued interest receivable
101
177
$
11,075
$
17,119
Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests
NNN holds the commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) from
seven
securitizations. Each of the Residuals is recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment.
The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment as of
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Unrealized gains
$
875
$
511
$
1,132
Other than temporary valuation impairment
256
1,185
2,812
35
Based on the expected timing of future cash flows relating to the Residuals certain valuation assumptions are made. During the years ended December 31,
2014
,
2013
and
2012
, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation adjustment as a reduction of earnings from operations. The following table summarizes the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of
December 31
:
2014
2013
Discount rate
20
%
20
%
Average life equivalent CPR
(1)
speeds range
0.87% to 26.30% CPR
0.80% to 20.76% CPR
Foreclosures:
Frequency curve default model
0.70% - 2.45% range
0.07% - 2.43% range
Loss severity of loans in foreclosure
20
%
20
%
Yield:
LIBOR
Forward 3-month curve
Forward 3-month curve
Prime
Forward curve
Forward curve
(1)
Conditional prepayment rate
36
Item7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
NNN is exposed to interest rate risk primarily as a result of its variable rate Credit Facility and its fixed rate debt which is used to finance NNN’s development and acquisition activities, as well as for general corporate purposes. NNN’s interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives, NNN borrows at both fixed and variable rates on its long-term debt. As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN had no outstanding derivatives.
The information in the table below summarizes NNN’s market risks associated with its debt obligations outstanding as of
December 31, 2014
and
2013
. The table presents principal payments and related interest rates by year for debt obligations outstanding as of
December 31, 2014
. NNN has a variable interest rate risk on its Credit Facility which had no outstanding balance as of December 31, 2014. The weighted average rate for the Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2014, was
1.2%
. The fair value of the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was $0 and $46,400,000, respectively. The table incorporates only those debt obligations that existed as of
December 31, 2014
, and it does not consider those debt obligations or positions which could arise after this date. Moreover, because firm commitments are not presented in the table below, the information presented therein has limited predictive value. As a result, NNN’s ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, NNN’s hedging strategies at that time and interest rates. If interest rates on NNN’s variable rate debt increased by one percent, NNN’s interest expense would have increased by less than one percent for the year ended
December 31, 2014
.
Debt Obligations (dollars in thousands)
Fixed Rate Debt
Mortgages
(1)
Unsecured Debt
(2)
Debt
Obligation
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Debt
Obligation
Effective
Interest
Rate
(3)
2015
$
1,870
6.36%
$
149,952
6.19%
2016
7,514
5.90%
—
—
2017
3,441
6.27%
249,693
6.92%
2018
710
5.69%
—
—
2019
688
5.42%
—
—
Thereafter
12,116
5.23%
1,315,070
4.20%
Total
$
26,339
5.47%
$
1,714,715
4.77%
Fair Value:
December 31, 2014
$
26,339
$
1,813,439
December 31, 2013
$
9,475
$
1,555,672
(1)
NNN's mortgages payable include unamortized premiums.
(2)
Includes NNN’s notes payable net of unamortized discounts. NNN uses market prices quoted from Bloomberg, a third party, which is a Level 1 input, to determine the fair value.
(3)
Weighted average effective interest rate for periods after 2019.
NNN is also exposed to market risks related to NNN’s Residuals. Factors that may impact the market value of the Residuals include delinquencies, loan losses, prepayment speeds and interest rates. The Residuals, which are reported at market value, had a carrying value of
$11,626,000
and
$11,721,000
as of
December 31, 2014
and
2013
, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Losses are considered other than temporary and reported as a valuation impairment in earnings from operations if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows that leads to a loss in value.
37
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2014
, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2014
, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2014
and
2013
, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2014
and our report dated
February 20, 2015
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Orlando, Florida
February 20, 2015
38
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2014
and
2013
, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2014
. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries at
December 31, 2014
and
2013
, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2014
, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method for reporting discontinued operations effective January 1, 2014.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), National Retail Properties, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2014
, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated
February 20, 2015
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Orlando, Florida
February 20, 2015
39
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
ASSETS
December 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
Real estate portfolio:
Accounted for using the operating method, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization
$
4,717,680
$
4,259,384
Accounted for using the direct financing method
16,974
18,342
Real estate held for sale
5,395
9,324
Mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable
11,075
17,119
Commercial mortgage residual interests
11,626
11,721
Cash and cash equivalents
10,604
1,485
Receivables, net of allowance of $1,784 and $2,822, respectively
3,013
4,107
Accrued rental income, net of allowance of $3,086 and $3,181, respectively
25,659
24,797
Debt costs, net of accumulated amortization of $14,353 and $20,213, respectively
16,453
12,877
Other assets
108,235
95,367
Total assets
$
4,926,714
$
4,454,523
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Line of credit payable
$
—
$
46,400
Mortgages payable, including unamortized premium of $890 and $130, respectively
26,339
9,475
Notes payable, net of unamortized discount of $10,285 and $10,816, respectively
1,714,715
1,514,184
Accrued interest payable
17,396
17,142
Other liabilities
85,172
89,037
Total liabilities
1,843,622
1,676,238
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 15,000,000 shares
6.625% Series D, 115,000 shares issued and outstanding, at stated liquidation value of $2,500 per share
287,500
287,500
5.700% Series E, 115,000 shares issued and outstanding, at stated liquidation value of $2,500 per share
287,500
287,500
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 375,000,000 shares; 132,010,104 and 121,991,677
shares issued and outstanding, respectively
1,322
1,221
Capital in excess of par value
2,711,678
2,353,166
Retained earnings (loss)
(196,827
)
(147,837
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(8,658
)
(4,505
)
Total stockholders’ equity of NNN
3,082,515
2,777,045
Noncontrolling interests
577
1,240
Total equity
3,083,092
2,778,285
Total liabilities and equity
$
4,926,714
$
4,454,523
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
40
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases
$
414,043
$
372,913
$
312,629
Earned income from direct financing leases
1,725
1,955
2,119
Percentage rent
1,074
1,556
1,165
Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants
13,875
13,340
11,817
Interest and other income from real estate transactions
2,296
1,471
2,243
Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests
1,834
2,290
2,673
434,847
393,525
332,646
Retail operations:
Revenues
—
—
19,008
Operating expenses
—
—
(18,542
)
Net
—
—
466
Operating expenses:
General and administrative
32,518
31,095
31,828
Real estate
18,905
18,497
17,425
Depreciation and amortization
116,162
99,274
73,806
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation
256
1,185
2,812
Impairment losses and other charges, net of recoveries
760
3,580
3,899
168,601
153,631
129,770
Earnings from operations
266,246
239,894
203,342
Other expenses (revenues):
Interest and other income
(357
)
(1,493
)
(2,232
)
Interest expense
85,510
85,822
83,787
Real estate acquisition costs
1,391
1,485
364
86,544
85,814
81,919
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax benefit (expense) and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate
179,702
154,080
121,423
Income tax benefit (expense)
75
(74
)
6,891
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate
—
—
4,074
Earnings from continuing operations
179,777
154,006
132,388
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense
124
5,972
9,549
Earnings before gain on disposition of real estate, net of income tax expense
179,901
159,978
141,937
Gain on disposition of real estate, net of income tax expense
11,269
107
—
Earnings including noncontrolling interests
191,170
160,085
141,937
Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests:
Continuing operations
(569
)
223
102
Discontinued operations
—
(163
)
(24
)
(569
)
60
78
Net earnings attributable to NNN
$
190,601
$
160,145
$
142,015
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Net earnings attributable to NNN
$
190,601
$
160,145
$
142,015
Series C preferred stock dividends
—
—
(1,979
)
Series D preferred stock dividends
(19,047
)
(19,047
)
(15,449
)
Series E preferred stock dividends
(16,387
)
(8,876
)
—
Excess of redemption value over carrying value of Series C preferred shares redeemed
—
—
(3,098
)
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders
$
155,167
$
132,222
$
121,489
Net earnings per share of common stock:
Basic:
Continuing operations
$
1.24
$
1.06
$
1.04
Discontinued operations
—
0.05
0.09
Net earnings
$
1.24
$
1.11
$
1.13
Diluted:
Continuing operations
$
1.24
$
1.05
$
1.02
Discontinued operations
—
0.05
0.09
Net earnings
$
1.24
$
1.10
$
1.11
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic
124,257,558
118,204,148
106,965,156
Diluted
124,710,226
119,864,824
109,117,515
Other comprehensive income:
Net earnings attributable to NNN
$
190,601
$
160,145
$
142,015
Amortization of interest rate hedges
1,129
438
231
Fair value forward starting swaps
(6,312
)
(3,141
)
—
Net gain (loss) – commercial mortgage residual interests
1,038
(438
)
1,132
Net gain (loss) – available-for-sale securities
(8
)
69
85
Reclassification of noncontrolling interests
—
949
—
Comprehensive income attributable to NNN
$
186,448
$
158,022
$
143,463
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Series C
Preferred
Stock
Series D
Preferred
Stock
Series E
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Retained
Earnings (Loss)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balances at December 31, 2011
$
92,000
$
—
—
$
1,049
$
1,958,225
$
(44,946
)
$
(3,830
)
$
2,002,498
$
1,378
$
2,003,876
Net earnings
—
—
—
—
—
142,015
—
142,015
(78
)
141,937
Dividends declared and paid:
$0.53776 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(1,979
)
—
(1,979
)
—
(1,979
)
$1.34340 per depositary share of Series D preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(15,449
)
—
(15,449
)
—
(15,449
)
$1.56 per share of common stock
—
—
—
4
11,758
(167,495
)
—
(155,733
)
—
(155,733
)
Redemption of 3,680,000 depositary shares of Series C Preferred Stock
(92,000
)
—
—
—
3,098
(3,098
)
—
(92,000
)
—
(92,000
)
Issuance of 11,500,000 depositary shares of Series D Preferred Stock
—
287,500
—
—
(9,855
)
—
—
277,645
—
277,645
Issuance of common stock:
40,460 shares
—
—
—
—
833
—
—
833
—
833
1,689,160 shares – stock purchase program
—
—
—
17
44,395
—
—
44,412
—
44,412
4,282,298 shares – ATM equity program
—
—
—
43
129,049
—
—
129,092
—
129,092
Issuance of 373,913 shares of restricted common stock
—
—
—
4
331
—
—
335
—
335
Equity component of convertible debt
—
—
—
—
(41,486
)
—
—
(41,486
)
—
(41,486
)
Stock issuance costs
—
—
—
—
(2,265
)
—
—
(2,265
)
—
(2,265
)
Performance incentive plan
—
—
—
—
(451
)
—
—
(451
)
—
(451
)
Amortization of deferred compensation
—
—
—
—
7,370
—
—
7,370
—
7,370
Amortization of interest rate hedges
—
—
—
—
—
—
231
231
—
231
Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,132
1,132
—
1,132
Valuation adjustments – available-for-sale securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
85
85
—
85
Balances at December 31, 2012
$
—
$
287,500
$
—
$
1,117
$
2,101,002
$
(90,952
)
$
(2,382
)
$
2,296,285
$
1,300
$
2,297,585
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
43
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Series C
Preferred
Stock
Series D
Preferred
Stock
Series E
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Retained
Earnings (Loss)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balances at December 31, 2012
$
—
$
287,500
$
—
$
1,117
$
2,101,002
$
(90,952
)
$
(2,382
)
$
2,296,285
$
1,300
$
2,297,585
Net earnings
—
—
—
—
—
160,145
—
160,145
(60
)
160,085
Dividends declared and paid:
$1.65625 per depositary share of Series D preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(19,047
)
—
(19,047
)
—
(19,047
)
$0.77188 per depositary share of Series E preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(8,876
)
—
(8,876
)
—
(8,876
)
$1.60 per share of common stock
—
—
—
4
14,941
(189,107
)
—
(174,162
)
—
(174,162
)
Issuance of 11,500,000 depositary shares of Series E Preferred Stock
—
—
287,500
—
(9,856
)
—
—
277,644
—
277,644
Issuance of common stock:
29,013 shares
—
—
—
—
744
—
—
744
—
744
322,084 shares – stock purchase program
—
—
—
3
10,458
—
—
10,461
—
10,461
6,956,992 shares – ATM equity program
—
—
—
70
242,348
—
—
242,418
—
242,418
2,407,911 shares – conversion of 2028 Notes
—
—
—
24
85,200
—
—
85,224
—
85,224
Issuance of 290,181 shares of restricted common stock
—
—
—
3
(213
)
—
—
(210
)
—
(210
)
Equity component of convertible debt
—
—
—
—
(93,450
)
—
—
(93,450
)
—
(93,450
)
Stock issuance costs
—
—
—
—
(3,774
)
—
—
(3,774
)
—
(3,774
)
Amortization of deferred compensation
—
—
—
—
6,715
—
—
6,715
—
6,715
Amortization of interest rate hedges
—
—
—
—
—
—
438
438
—
438
Fair value forward swaps
—
—
—
—
—
—
(3,141
)
(3,141
)
—
(3,141
)
Unrealized loss – commercial mortgage residual interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
(438
)
(438
)
—
(438
)
Valuation adjustments – available-for-sale securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
69
69
—
69
Noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
(949
)
—
949
—
—
—
Balances at December 31, 2013
$
—
$
287,500
$
287,500
$
1,221
$
2,353,166
$
(147,837
)
$
(4,505
)
$
2,777,045
$
1,240
$
2,778,285
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Series C
Preferred
Stock
Series D
Preferred
Stock
Series E
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Retained
Earnings (Loss)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balances at December 31, 2013
$
—
$
287,500
$
287,500
$
1,221
$
2,353,166
$
(147,837
)
$
(4,505
)
$
2,777,045
$
1,240
$
2,778,285
Net earnings
—
—
—
—
—
190,601
—
190,601
569
191,170
Dividends declared and paid:
$1.65625 per depositary share of Series D preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(19,047
)
—
(19,047
)
—
(19,047
)
$1.42500 per depositary share of Series E preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(16,387
)
—
(16,387
)
—
(16,387
)
$1.65 per share of common stock
—
—
—
3
11,443
(204,157
)
—
(192,711
)
—
(192,711
)
Issuance of common stock:
5,493,595 shares
—
—
—
55
209,185
—
—
209,240
—
209,240
100,161 shares – stock purchase program
—
—
—
1
3,370
—
—
3,371
—
3,371
3,758,362 shares – ATM equity program
—
—
—
38
137,077
—
—
137,115
—
137,115
Issuance of 360,080 shares of restricted common stock
—
—
—
4
(313
)
—
—
(309
)
—
(309
)
Stock issuance costs
—
—
—
—
(10,683
)
—
—
(10,683
)
—
(10,683
)
Amortization of deferred compensation
—
—
—
—
8,433
—
—
8,433
—
8,433
Amortization of interest rate hedges
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,129
1,129
—
1,129
Fair value forward swaps
—
—
—
—
—
—
(6,312
)
(6,312
)
—
(6,312
)
Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
875
875
—
875
Realized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
163
163
—
163
Valuation adjustments – available-for-sale securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
111
111
—
111
Realized gain – available-for-sale securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
(119
)
(119
)
—
(119
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,232
)
(1,232
)
Balances at December 31, 2014
$
—
$
287,500
$
287,500
$
1,322
$
2,711,678
$
(196,827
)
$
(8,658
)
$
3,082,515
$
577
$
3,083,092
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
45
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Earnings including noncontrolling interests
$
191,170
$
160,085
$
141,937
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
116,165
99,617
75,334
Impairment losses and other charges
823
4,106
10,114
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation
256
1,185
2,812
Amortization of notes payable discount
1,238
3,188
4,976
Amortization of debt costs
2,782
3,118
2,584
Amortization of mortgages payable premium
(93
)
(57
)
(29
)
Amortization of deferred interest rate hedges
1,129
438
231
Interest rate hedge payment
(6,312
)
(3,141
)
—
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate
—
—
(4,074
)
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliate
—
—
7,019
Gain on disposition of real estate
(11,742
)
(6,445
)
(10,956
)
Deferred income taxes
58
800
(7,034
)
Performance incentive plan expense
9,841
8,518
10,136
Performance incentive plan payment
(2,808
)
(2,138
)
—
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations:
Additions to held for sale real estate
—
(1,029
)
(6,616
)
Decrease in real estate leased to others using the direct financing method
1,368
1,573
1,624
Decrease (increase) in mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable
76
641
(187
)
Decrease (increase) in receivables
16
62
(264
)
Decrease (increase) in accrued rental income
(1,490
)
368
(456
)
Decrease (increase) in other assets
(2,256
)
400
1,657
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable
254
(385
)
2,419
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
(4,746
)
3,841
(2,002
)
Other
1,004
(324
)
(1,095
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
296,733
274,421
228,130
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from the disposition of real estate
58,853
60,626
81,402
Additions to real estate:
Accounted for using the operating method
(602,780
)
(637,417
)
(684,925
)
Increase in mortgages and notes receivable
(7,246
)
(3,857
)
(8,768
)
Principal payments on mortgages and notes receivable
13,346
14,617
12,804
Return of investment from unconsolidated affiliate
—
—
1,220
Other
(3,731
)
(2,009
)
(3,492
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(541,558
)
(568,040
)
(601,759
)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from line of credit payable
$
678,500
$
601,800
$
1,184,900
Repayment of line of credit payable
(724,900
)
(729,600
)
(1,076,300
)
Repayment of mortgages payable
(1,151
)
(1,070
)
(19,390
)
Proceeds from notes payable
349,293
347,406
320,011
Repayment of notes payable
(150,000
)
—
(50,000
)
Repayment of notes payable – convertible
—
(246,797
)
(164,649
)
Payment of debt costs
(6,321
)
(3,265
)
(4,512
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
360,072
267,613
185,223
Proceeds from issuance of Series D preferred stock
—
—
287,500
Proceeds from issuance of Series E preferred stock
—
287,500
—
Redemption of Series C preferred stock
—
—
(92,000
)
Payment of Series C Preferred Stock dividends
—
—
(1,979
)
Payment of Series D Preferred Stock dividends
(19,047
)
(19,047
)
(15,449
)
Payment of Series E Preferred Stock dividends
(16,387
)
(8,876
)
—
Stock issuance costs
(10,726
)
(13,529
)
(12,237
)
Payment of common stock dividends
(204,157
)
(189,107
)
(167,495
)
Noncontrolling interest distributions
(1,232
)
—
—
Net cash provided by financing activities
253,944
293,028
373,623
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
9,119
(591
)
(6
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
1,485
2,076
2,082
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
10,604
$
1,485
$
2,076
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amount capitalized
$
81,829
$
80,930
$
75,283
Taxes paid
$
59
$
360
$
201
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
Issued 2,407,911 shares of common stock for conversion premium on 2028 Notes
$
—
$
85,224
$
—
Issued 371,434, 298,896 and 398,578 shares of restricted and unrestricted common stock in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan
$
10,357
$
8,218
$
8,638
Issued 14,999, 16,605 and 16,078 shares of common stock in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, to directors pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan
$
527
$
582
$
463
Issued 16,016, 12,308 and 19,212 shares of common stock in 2014, 2013 and
2012, respectively, pursuant to NNN’s Deferred Director Fee Plan
$
263
$
162
$
298
Surrender of 241 and 15,286 shares of restricted common stock in 2013 and 2012, respectively
$
—
$
7
$
357
Change in other comprehensive income
$
4,153
$
2,123
$
1,448
Change in lease classification (direct financing lease to operating lease)
$
—
$
1,156
$
1,678
Mortgages payable assumed in connection with real estate transactions
$
17,254
$
—
$
6,634
Mortgage receivable accepted in connection with real estate transactions
$
62
$
750
$
—
Note receivable accepted in connection with real estate transactions
$
70
$
—
$
—
Real estate acquired in connection with mortgage receivable foreclosure
$
—
$
—
$
490
Real estate received in note receivable foreclosure
$
—
$
—
$
1,595
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
47
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Organization and Nature of Business
– National Retail Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries. These taxable subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”
NNN assets include: real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable, and commercial mortgage residual interests. NNN acquires, owns, invests in and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Properties” or “Property Portfolio” or individually a "Property").
December 31, 2014
Property Portfolio:
Total properties
2,054
Gross leasable area (square feet)
22,479,000
States
47
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
12
NNN's operations are reported within
one
business segment in the financial statements and all properties are considered part of the Properties or Property Portfolio. As such, property counts and calculations involving property counts reflect all NNN properties.
Principles of Consolidation
– NNN’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of each of the respective majority owned and controlled affiliates, including transactions whereby NNN has been determined to be the primary beneficiary in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance included in
Consolidation.
All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated. NNN applies the equity method of accounting to investments in partnerships and joint ventures that are not subject to control by NNN due to the significance of rights held by other parties.
NNN consolidates certain joint venture development entities based upon either NNN being the primary beneficiary of the respective variable interest entity or NNN having a controlling interest over the respective entity. NNN eliminates significant intercompany balances and transactions and records a noncontrolling interest for its other partners’ ownership percentage.
Real Estate Portfolio
– NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, NNN recorded
$1,629,000
,
$1,369,000
and
$1,540,000
, respectively, in capitalized interest during development.
Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease
– In accordance with the FASB guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases and the value of in-place leases, based in each case on their fair values. Acquisition and closing costs incurred on the acquisition of real estate with an in-place lease is expensed as incurred and recorded as real estate acquisition costs.
The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired leased property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on the determination of the fair values of these assets.
In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded as other assets or liabilities based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases, and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured
48
over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease, including the probability of renewal periods. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term unless the Company believes that it is likely that the tenant will renew the option whereby the Company amortizes the value attributable to the renewal over the renewal period.
The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, consisting of in-place leases, is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental rates over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as-if-vacant, determined as set forth above. The value of in-place leases exclusive of the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be written off. The value of tenant relationships is reviewed on individual transactions to determine if future value was derived from the acquisition.
Intangible assets and liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31 (in thousands):
2014
2013
Intangible lease assets (included in Other assets):
Value of above market in-place leases, net
$
11,751
$
11,803
Value of in-place leases, net
65,770
58,456
Intangible lease liabilities (included in Other liabilities):
Value of below market in-place leases, net
29,162
28,708
NNN's real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the Property, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance, repairs and capital expenditures. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:
Operating method
– Properties with leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rentals vary during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.
Direct financing method
– Properties with leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the Property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.
Real Estate – Held For Sale
– Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, less cost to sell.
Impairment – Real Estate
– Based upon certain events or changes in circumstances, management periodically assesses its Property Portfolio for possible impairment whenever the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions and the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are currently vacant or become vacant. Management evaluates whether an impairment in carrying value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying value of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value.
Real Estate Dispositions
– When real estate is disposed of, the related cost, accumulated depreciation or amortization and any accrued rental income for operating leases and the net investment for direct financing leases are removed from the accounts, and gains and losses from the dispositions are reflected in income. Gains from the disposition of real estate are generally recognized using the full accrual method in accordance with the FASB guidance included in
Real Estate Sales
, provided that various criteria relating to the terms of the sale and any subsequent involvement by NNN with the real estate sold are met. Lease termination fees are recognized when the related leases are cancelled and NNN no longer has a continuing involvement with the former tenant.
49
Valuation of Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest
– The reserve allowance related to the mortgages, notes and accrued interest is NNN’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses. The reserve allowance is determined on an individual note basis in reviewing any payment past due for over 90 days. Any outstanding amounts are written off against the reserve allowance when all possible means of collection have been exhausted.
Investment in an Unconsolidated Affiliate
– NNN accounted for its investment in an unconsolidated affiliate under the equity method of accounting. In September 2007, NNN entered into a joint venture, NNN Retail Properties Fund I LLC (the “NNN Crow JV”) with an affiliate of Crow Holdings Realty Partners IV, L.P., which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. During September 2012, NNN Crow JV sold all of its assets and paid off its bank term loan as of December 31, 2012. NNN Crow JV was formally dissolved in April 2013.
Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, at Fair Value
– Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their estimated market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
– NNN considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and money market accounts. Cash equivalents are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.
Cash accounts maintained on behalf of NNN in demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds may exceed federally insured levels or may be held in accounts without any federal insurance or any other insurance or guarantee. However, NNN has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
Valuation of Receivables
– NNN estimates the collectibility of its accounts receivable related to rents, expense reimbursements and other revenues. NNN analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, tenant credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants in bankruptcy are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims.
Debt Costs
– Debt costs incurred in connection with NNN’s
$650,000,000
line of credit and mortgages payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective loan commitment using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. Debt costs incurred in connection with the issuance of NNN’s notes payable have been deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the respective debt obligation using the effective interest method.
Revenue Recognition
– Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant. Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance included in
Leases,
based on the terms of the lease of the leased asset.
50
Earnings Per Share
– Earnings per share have been computed pursuant to the FASB guidance included in
Earnings Per Share
. The guidance requires classification of the Company’s unvested restricted share units which contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends, as participating securities requiring the two-class method of computing earnings per share. Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In applying the two-class method, undistributed earnings are allocated to both common shares and participating securities based on the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. The following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share using the two-class method for the years ended
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Basic and Diluted Earnings:
Net earnings attributable to NNN
$
190,601
$
160,145
$
142,015
Less: Series C preferred stock dividends
—
—
(1,979
)
Less: Series D preferred stock dividends
(19,047
)
(19,047
)
(15,449
)
Less: Series E preferred stock dividends
(16,387
)
(8,876
)
—
Less: Excess of redemption value over carrying value of Series C preferred shares redeemed
—
—
(3,098
)
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders
155,167
132,222
121,489
Less: Earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares
(773
)
(718
)
(741
)
Net earnings used in basic and diluted earnings per share
$
154,394
$
131,504
$
120,748
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
125,221,358
118,969,771
107,873,577
Less: Unvested restricted shares
(467,968
)
(448,590
)
(654,127
)
Less: Unvested contingent shares
(495,832
)
(317,033
)
(254,294
)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share
124,257,558
118,204,148
106,965,156
Effects of dilutive securities:
Convertible debt
—
1,468,559
1,987,842
Other
452,668
192,117
164,517
Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in diluted earnings per share
124,710,226
119,864,824
109,117,515
Income Taxes
– NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and related regulations. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, providing it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the
three
-year period ended
December 31, 2014
, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.
NNN and its taxable REIT subsidiaries have made timely TRS elections pursuant to the provisions of the REIT Modernization Act. A taxable REIT subsidiary is able to engage in activities resulting in income that previously would have been disqualified from being eligible REIT income under the federal income tax regulations. As a result, certain activities of NNN which occur within its TRS entities are subject to federal and state income taxes (See Note 13). All provisions for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are attributable to NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries and to the Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. ("OAMI"), a majority owned and controlled subsidiary, built-in-gain tax liability.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method as required by the FASB guidance included in
Income Taxes
. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the temporary differences based on estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
51
Fair Value Measurement
– NNN’s estimates of fair value of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities are based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The framework specifies a hierarchy of valuation inputs which was established to increase consistency, clarity and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based upon three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, two of which are considered observable and one that is considered unobservable. The following describes the three levels:
•
Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
•
Level 2 – Valuation is based upon inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
•
Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
– The following table outlines the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (dollars in thousands):
Gain or Loss on Cash Flow Hedges
(1)
Gains and Losses on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests
(2)
Gains and Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities
Total
Beginning balance, December 31, 2012
$
(5,693
)
$
3,244
$
67
$
(2,382
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
(3,141
)
511
69
(2,561
)
Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to net earnings
438
(3)
—
(4
)
—
(5
)
438
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
(2,703
)
511
69
(2,123
)
Ending balance, December 31, 2013
(8,396
)
3,755
136
(4,505
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
(6,312
)
875
111
(5,326
)
Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to net earnings
1,129
(3)
163
(4
)
(119
)
(5
)
1,173
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
(5,183
)
1,038
(8
)
(4,153
)
Ending balance, December 31, 2014
$
(13,579
)
$
4,793
$
128
$
(8,658
)
(1)
Additional disclosure is included in Note 15 – Derivatives.
(2)
Additional disclosure is included in Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements.
(3)
Reclassifications out of other comprehensive income are recorded in Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. There is no income tax expense (benefit) resulting from this reclassification.
(4)
Reclassifications out of other comprehensive income are recorded in Impairment on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. There is no income tax expense (benefit) resulting from this reclassification.
(5)
Reclassifications out of other comprehensive income are recorded in Other Income on the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. There is no income tax expense (benefit) resulting from this reclassification.
New Accounting Pronouncements
– In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2013-11, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The objective of the amendments in this update is to eliminate the diversity in practice of financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The provisions of the update are that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented, with certain exceptions, in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 did not have a significant impact on NNN's financial position or results of operations.
52
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposal of Components of an Entity,” effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2014, with early adoption permitted beginning January 1, 2014. Under ASU 2014-08, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations are to be presented as discontinued operations. NNN has elected early adoption of ASU 2014-08. This requires the Company to continue to classify any Property disposal or Property classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2013 as discontinued operations prospectively. Therefore, the revenues and expenses related to these properties are presented as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2014. The Company did not classify any additional properties as discontinued operations subsequent to December 31, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2014-08 did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations. The adoption of this standard resulted in the operations of certain current year dispositions were no longer classified as discontinued operations.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within that reporting period. The core principle of ASU 2014-09, is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Certain contracts are excluded from ASU 2014-09, including lease contracts within the scope of the FASB guidance included in
Leases
. NNN is currently evaluating to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on its financial position and results of operations.
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12, "Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718)," effective for annual periods and interim periods within those periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. NNN is currently evaluating to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption of ASU 2014-12 will have on its financial position and results of operations.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The amendments in this update provide guidance in GAAP about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. NNN is currently evaluating to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption of ASU 2014-15 will have on footnote disclosures.
In November 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-16, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)." Entities commonly raise capital by issuing different classes of shares, including preferred stock, that entitle the holders to certain preferences and rights over the other shareholders. The specific terms of those shares may include conversion rights, redemption rights, voting rights, and liquidation and dividend payment preferences, among other features. One or more of those features may meet the definition of a derivative under GAAP. Shares that include such embedded derivative features are referred to as hybrid financial instruments. The objective of this update is to eliminate the use of different methods in practice and thereby reduce existing diversity under GAAP in the accounting for hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. NNN is currently evaluating to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption of ASU 2014-16 will have on its financial position and results of operations.
Use of Estimates
– Additional critical accounting policies of NNN include management’s estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Additional critical accounting policies include management’s estimates of the useful lives used in calculating depreciation expense relating to real estate assets, purchase price allocation, the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including the commercial mortgage residual interests, the recoverability of the deferred income taxes, and the collectibility of receivables from tenants, including accrued rental income. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Correction of Immaterial Errors
– During the year ended December 31, 2012, NNN identified certain immaterial errors related to deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance. In 2009, NNN incurred a loss on foreclosure and impairment charges associated with acquiring the operations of one of its lessees. The properties and operations were transferred to taxable REIT subsidiaries upon foreclosure. Certain charges associated with the acquisition and impaired properties should have been recorded in NNN’s qualified REIT subsidiaries prior to the properties’ transfer to the taxable REIT subsidiary group. Deferred tax assets associated with the book charges of
$10,350,000
in 2009 were inappropriately recorded in the taxable REIT subsidiary group. A valuation allowance for the full amount of the deferred tax assets was also recorded in 2009. In the year ended December 31, 2012, NNN decreased deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance by
$10,350,000
each to correct the error.
53
NNN further reviewed its conclusions in previous periods, commencing in 2009, with respect to the realizability of the remaining deferred tax assets. Upon further review, NNN determined that its available sources of income supported realizability of all but
$3,104,000
of its gross deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011. As a result, NNN determined that it had previously understated its deferred income tax benefit in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 by
$3,121,000
and
$3,372,000
, respectively, and understated its net deferred tax assets by
$6,493,000
as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, in its financial statements. NNN corrected this in the year ended December 31, 2012 by reversing the valuation allowance and recording an income tax benefit of
$6,493,000
. NNN reviewed the impact of correcting the prior period errors in 2012 as well as its impact on prior periods in accordance with SAB Topics 1.M and 1.N and determined that the misstatements did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, trends in earnings, or cash flows for any of the periods presented.
Furthermore, NNN determined in the year ended December 31, 2012 that its available sources of income supported realizability of all of its gross deferred tax assets. In 2012, NNN reversed the remaining valuation allowance and recorded an income tax benefit of
$1,178,000
.
Reclassification
– Certain items in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
2014
presentation.
Note 2 – Real Estate:
Real Estate – Portfolio
Leases
– The following outlines key information for NNN’s leases at
December 31, 2014
:
Lease classification:
Operating
2,083
Direct financing
12
Building portion – direct financing/land portion – operating
1
Weighted average remaining lease term
12 years
The leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. Generally, the tenant is also required to pay all property taxes and assessments, substantially maintain the Property and carry property and liability insurance coverage. Certain of the Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for specific costs and expenses of the Property. Generally, the leases provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options, subject to generally the same terms and conditions of the base term of the lease, including rent increases.
Real Estate Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Operating Method
– Real estate subject to operating leases consisted of the following as of
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
Land and improvements
$
1,784,494
$
1,652,304
Buildings and improvements
3,414,691
2,960,845
Leasehold interests
1,290
1,290
5,200,475
4,614,439
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
(511,703
)
(415,774
)
4,688,772
4,198,665
Work in progress
28,908
60,719
$
4,717,680
$
4,259,384
Some leases provide for scheduled rent increases throughout the lease term. Such amounts are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. For the years ended
December 31
,
2014
,
2013
and
2012
, NNN recognized collectively in continuing and discontinued operations,
$1,521,000
,
($338,000)
and
$487,000
, respectively, of such income, net of reserves. At
December 31
,
2014
and
2013
, the balance of accrued rental income, net of allowances of
$3,086,000
and
$3,181,000
, respectively, was
$25,659,000
and
$24,797,000
, respectively.
54
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on noncancellable operating leases at
December 31, 2014
(dollars in thousands):
2015
$
432,369
2016
427,152
2017
417,412
2018
392,925
2019
375,013
Thereafter
3,025,217
$
5,070,088
Since lease renewal periods are exercisable at the option of the tenant, the above table only presents future minimum lease payments due during the current lease terms. In addition, this table does not include amounts for potential variable rent increases that are based on the CPI or future contingent rents which may be received on the leases based on a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales.
Real Estate Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Direct Financing Method
– The following lists the components of net investment in direct financing leases at
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
Minimum lease payments to be received
$
17,376
$
20,469
Estimated unguaranteed residual values
8,274
8,274
Less unearned income
(8,676
)
(10,401
)
Net investment in direct financing leases
$
16,974
$
18,342
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on direct financing leases held for investment at
December 31, 2014
(dollars in thousands):
2015
$
2,956
2016
2,873
2017
2,035
2018
2,007
2019
1,513
Thereafter
5,992
$
17,376
The above table does not include future minimum lease payments for renewal periods, potential variable CPI rent increases or contingent rental payments that may become due in future periods (see Real Estate Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Operating Method).
55
Real Estate – Held For Sale
On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates its Properties for held for sale classification based on specific criteria as outlined in ASC 360,
Property, Plant & Equipment,
including management’s intent to commit to a plan to sell the asset. In January 2014, NNN completed a strategic review of its Properties held for sale and reclassified one Property that was previously held for sale to held for investment, included in Real Estate – Portfolio. As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN had
seven
of its Properties categorized as held for sale. NNN anticipates the disposition of these Properties to occur within 12 months. NNN's real estate held for sale at
December 31, 2013
, included
eight
properties,
two
of which were subsequently sold in
2014
. Real estate held for sale consisted of the following as of (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
Land and improvements
$
3,246
$
5,751
Building and improvements
4,644
8,067
7,890
13,818
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
(1,473
)
(2,362
)
Less impairment
(1,022
)
(2,132
)
$
5,395
$
9,324
Real Estate – Dispositions
The following table summarizes the Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized on the disposition of Properties for the years ended
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
# of Sold
Properties
Gain
# of Sold
Properties
Gain
# of Sold
Properties
Gain
Gain on disposition of real estate
25
$
11,587
—
$
173
—
$
—
Income tax expense
(318
)
(66
)
—
11,269
107
—
Gain on disposition of real estate included in discontinued operations
2
155
(1)
35
6,272
(1)
34
10,956
(1)
Income tax expense
—
(784
)
—
$
11,424
$
5,595
$
10,956
(1)
Amount includes the recognition of deferred gains on previously sold properties.
Real Estate – Commitments
NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments on leased Properties. The improvements are estimated to be completed within 12 months. These construction commitments, as of
December 31, 2014
, are outlined in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Number of properties
26
Total commitment
(1)
$
110,081
Amount funded
$
57,465
Remaining commitment
$
52,616
(1)
Includes land, construction costs, tenant improvements and lease costs.
56
Real Estate – Impairments
Management periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions and the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. As a result of the Company’s review of long lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets, NNN recognized the following real estate impairments for the years ended
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Continuing operations
$
760
$
3,565
$
4,070
Discontinued operations
63
541
6,242
$
823
$
4,106
$
10,312
The valuation of impaired assets is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis, income capitalization, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sales negotiations and bona fide purchase offers received from third parties, which are Level 3 inputs. NNN may consider a single valuation technique or multiple valuation techniques, as appropriate, when estimating the fair value of its real estate.
Note 3 – Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest Receivable
:
Mortgage notes are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
Mortgages and notes receivable
$
10,974
$
16,942
Accrued interest receivables
101
177
$
11,075
$
17,119
Note 4 – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests
:
NNN holds the commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) from
seven
securitizations. Each of the Residuals is recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment.
The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment as of
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Unrealized gains
$
875
$
511
$
1,132
Other than temporary valuation impairment
256
1,185
2,812
57
Based on the expected timing of future cash flows relating to the Residuals certain valuation assumptions are made. During the years ended December 31,
2014
,
2013
and
2012
, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation adjustment as a reduction of earnings from operations. The following table summarizes the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of
December 31
:
2014
2013
Discount rate
20
%
20
%
Average life equivalent CPR
(1)
speeds range
0.87% to 26.30% CPR
0.80% to 20.76% CPR
Foreclosures:
Frequency curve default model
0.70% - 2.45% range
0.07% - 2.43% range
Loss severity of loans in foreclosure
20
%
20
%
Yield:
LIBOR
Forward 3-month curve
Forward 3-month curve
Prime
Forward curve
Forward curve
(1)
Conditional prepayment rate
The following table shows the effects on the key assumptions affecting the fair value of the Residuals at
December 31, 2014
(dollars in thousands):
Residuals
Carrying amount of retained interests
$
11,626
Discount rate assumption:
Fair value at 25% discount rate
$
9,824
Fair value at 27% discount rate
$
9,194
Prepayment speed assumption:
Fair value of 1% increases above the CPR Index
$
11,624
Fair value of 2% increases above the CPR Index
$
11,623
Expected credit losses:
Fair value 2% adverse change
$
11,509
Fair value 3% adverse change
$
11,450
Yield Assumptions:
Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 25 basis points
$
11,849
Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 50 basis points
$
12,073
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation of a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumptions; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
58
Note 5 – Line of Credit Payable
:
In October 2014, NNN amended and restated its credit agreement increasing the borrowing capacity under its unsecured revolving credit facility from
$500,000,000
to
$650,000,000
and amended certain other terms under the former revolving credit facility (as the context requires, the previous and new revolving credit facility, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility had a weighted average outstanding balance of
$56,590,000
and a weighted average interest rate of
1.2%
for the year ended
December 31, 2014
. The Credit Facility matures
January 2019
, with an option to extend maturity to
January 2020
. As of
December 31, 2014
, the Credit Facility bears interest at
LIBOR plus 92.5
basis points; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN's debt rating. The Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature to increase the facility size up to
$1,000,000,000
. As of
December 31, 2014
, there was
no
outstanding balance and
$650,000,000
was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility.
In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage and (iv) investment and dividend limitations. At
December 31, 2014
, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.
Note 6 – Mortgages Payable
:
The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):
Entered
(1)
Initial
Balance
Interest
Rate
Maturity
(2)
Carrying
Value of
Encumbered
Asset(s)
(3)
Outstanding Principal
Balance at December 31,
2014
2013
December 2001
$
623
9.00%
April 2014
$
—
$
—
$
27
December 2001
$
698
9.00%
April 2019
868
223
263
December 2001
485
9.00%
April 2019
841
116
136
February 2004
6,952
6.90%
January 2017
10,554
1,577
2,257
March 2005
1,015
8.14%
September 2016
1,245
222
335
June 2012
(4)
6,850
5.75%
April 2016
8,529
6,180
6,457
September 2014
(4)
2,957
6.40%
February 2017
3,797
2,922
—
November 2014
(4)
15,151
5.23%
July 2023
22,376
15,099
—
$
48,210
$
26,339
$
9,475
(1)
Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan.
(2)
Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.
(3)
Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of the Properties. The carrying values of the assets are as of
December 31, 2014
.
(4)
Initial balance and outstanding principal balance includes unamortized premium.
The following is a schedule of the scheduled principal payments, net of premium amortization of NNN’s mortgages payable at
December 31, 2014
(dollars in thousands):
2015
$
1,870
2016
7,514
2017
3,441
2018
710
2019
688
Thereafter
12,116
$
26,339
59
Note 7 – Notes Payable – Convertible
:
On September 28, 2012, NNN announced that the market price condition on its
3.950%
convertible senior notes due 2026 (the "2026 Notes") has been satisfied, and that the 2026 Notes would be convertible during the calendar quarter beginning October 1, 2012.
All note holders elected to exercise the conversion feature of the 2026 Notes prior to their redemption. Pursuant to the terms of the 2026 Notes, the Company elected to pay the full settlement value in cash. The settlement value of a note was based on an average of the daily closing price of the Company's common stock over an averaging period that commenced after the Company received a conversion notice from a note holder. The Company paid approximately
$164,649,000
in aggregate settlement value for the
$123,163,000
of settled 2026 Notes at the end of the applicable averaging periods. The difference between the amount paid and the principal amount of the settled 2026 Notes of
$41,486,000
was recognized as a decrease to additional paid-in capital.
As of December 31, 2012,
$15,537,000
of the principal amount of 2026 Notes were outstanding. In January 2013, the Company paid approximately
$20,702,000
in aggregate settlement value for the remaining
$15,537,000
of outstanding 2026 Notes. The difference between the amount paid and the principal amount of the settled 2026 Notes of
$5,028,000
was recognized as a decrease to additional paid-in capital and
$137,000
was recorded as interest expense.
As of December 31, 2012,
$223,035,000
of the principal amount of the
5.125%
convertible senior notes due 2028 (the "2028 Notes") were outstanding. In June 2013, NNN called all of the outstanding 2028 Notes for redemption on July 11, 2013. On July 11, 2013,
$130,000
principal amount of the 2028 Notes was settled at par plus accrued interest. The holders of the remaining balance of
$222,905,000
principal amount of 2028 Notes elected to convert into cash and shares of the Company's common stock in accordance with the conversion formula which is based on the average daily closing price of NNN's common stock price over a period of
20 days
commencing after receipt of a note holder's conversion notice. In 2013, the Company issued
2,407,911
shares of common stock and paid approximately
$226,427,000
in aggregate settlement value for the
$223,035,000
aggregate principal amount of 2028 Notes outstanding. The difference between the amount paid and the principal amount of the settled notes of
$3,197,000
was recognized as a decrease to additional paid-in capital and
$195,000
was recorded as interest expense.
NNN recorded the following in interest expense relating to the 2028 Notes and the 2026 Notes for the years ended
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2013
2012
Noncash interest charges
$
2,072
$
4,291
Contractual interest expense
5,400
15,744
Amortization of debt costs
566
1,149
$
8,038
$
21,184
There was
no
interest expense related to the 2028 Notes and the 2026 Notes for the year ended
December 31
,
2014
.
Note 8 – Notes Payable
:
Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes is summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Notes
(1)
Issue Date
Principal
Discount
(1)
Net
Price
Stated
Rate
Effective
Rate
(2)
Maturity
Date
2015
(6)
November 2005
$
150,000
$
390
$
149,610
6.150%
6.185%
December 2015
2017
(3)
September 2007
250,000
877
249,123
6.875%
6.924%
October 2017
2021
(4)
July 2011
300,000
4,269
295,731
5.500%
5.690%
July 2021
2022
August 2012
325,000
4,989
320,011
3.800%
3.984%
October 2022
2023
(5)
April 2013
350,000
2,594
347,406
3.300%
3.388%
April 2023
2024
(7)
May 2014
350,000
707
349,293
3.900%
3.924%
June 2024
(1)
The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.
(2)
Includes the effects of the discount, treasury lock gain/loss and swap gain/loss, as applicable.
60
(3)
NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of
$100,000
. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of
$3,260
, of which
$3,228
was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.
(4)
NNN entered into
two
interest rate hedges with a total notional amount of
$150,000
. Upon issuance of the 2021 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreements resulting in a liability of
$5,300
, of which
$5,218
was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the note using the effective interest method.
(5)
NNN entered into
four
forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of
$240,000
. Upon issuance of the 2023 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a liability of
$3,156
, of which
$3,141
was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the note using the effective interest method.
(6)
NNN plans to use proceeds from the Credit Facility and/or potential debt or equity offerings to repay the outstanding indebtedness.
(7)
NNN entered into
three
forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of
$225,000
. Upon issuance of the 2024 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a liability of
$6,312
, which was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the note using the effective interest method.
Each series of the notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and is subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. Each of the notes is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.
In connection with the debt offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling
$15,500,000
consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.
In
June 2014
, NNN repaid the
$150,000,000
6.250%
notes payable that were due in
June 2014
.
In accordance with the terms of the indenture, pursuant to which NNN’s notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios and (ii) certain interest coverage. At
December 31, 2014
, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.
Note 9 – Preferred Stock
:
7.375%
Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.
In October 2006, NNN issued
3,680,000
depositary shares, each representing
1/100
th
of a share of Series C Preferred Stock.
In March 2012, NNN redeemed all
3,680,000
outstanding depositary shares representing interests in its Series C Preferred Stock. The Series C Preferred Stock was redeemed at
$25.00
per depositary share, plus accumulated and unpaid distributions through the redemption date, for an aggregate redemption price of
$25.0768229
per depositary share. The excess carrying amount of preferred stock redeemed over the cash paid to redeem the preferred stock was
$3,098,000
of Series C Preferred Stock issuance costs.
NNN completed the following underwritten public offerings of cumulative redeemable preferred stock and are still outstanding ("Preferred Stock Shares") (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
Series
Dividend Rate
(1)
Issued
Depositary Shares Outstanding
(2)
Gross Proceeds
Stock Issuance Costs
(3)
Dividend Per Depositary Share
Earliest Redemption Date
(4)
Series D
6.625
%
February 2012
11,500,000
$
287,500
$
9,855
$
1.656250
February 2017
Series E
5.700
%
May 2013
11,500,000
287,500
9,856
1.425000
May 2018
(1)
Holders are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends.
(2)
Representing
1/100
th of a preferred share. Each issuance included
1,500,000
depositary shares in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment.
(3)
Consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, rating agency fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.
(4)
NNN may redeem the preferred stock underlying the depositary shares at a redemption price of
$2,500.00
per share (or
$25.00
per depositary share), plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends.
The Preferred Stock Shares underlying the depositary shares rank senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Preferred Stock Shares have no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. In addition, upon a change of control, as defined in the articles supplementary fixing the rights and preferences of the Preferred Stock Shares, NNN may redeem the Preferred Stock Shares underlying the
61
depositary shares at a redemption price of
$2,500.00
per share (or
$25.00
per depositary share), plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends, and in limited circumstances the holders of depositary shares may convert some or all of their Preferred Stock Shares into shares of NNN's common stock at conversion rates provided in the related articles supplementary. As of
February 20, 2015
, the Preferred Stock Shares were not redeemable or convertible.
Note 10 – Common Stock
:
In February 2012, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission which permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities.
In November 2014, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2012 shelf registration statement and issued
5,462,500
shares (including
712,500
shares in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment) of common stock at a price of
$38.16
per share and received net proceeds of
$199,961,000
. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately
$8,488,000
, consisting primarily of underwriters' fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.
In May 2012, NNN established an at-the-market ("ATM") equity program (“2012 ATM”) which allows NNN to sell up to an aggregate of
9,000,000
shares of common stock from time to time through May 2015, of which
8,958,840
shares had been issued as of
December 31, 2014
. The 2012 ATM will expire in accordance with its terms in May 2015. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the 2012 ATM for the year ended December 31 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
2013
2012
Shares of common stock
4,676,542
4,282,298
Average price per share (net)
$
32.60
$
29.64
Net proceeds
152,435
126,947
Stock issuance costs
(1)
2,161
2,145
(1)
Stock issuance costs consist primarily of underwriters' fees and commissions, and legal and accounting fees.
There were
no
common stock issuances pursuant to the 2012 ATM for the year ended
December 31, 2014
.
In March 2013, NNN established a second ATM equity program ("2013 ATM") which allows NNN to sell up to an aggregate of
9,000,000
shares of common stock from time to time through March 2015, of which
6,038,812
shares had been issued as of
December 31, 2014
. The 2013 ATM will expire in accordance with its terms in March 2015. The following table outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the 2013 ATM for the year ended December 31 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
2014
2013
Shares of common stock
3,758,362
2,280,450
Average price per share (net)
$
35.90
$
37.80
Net proceeds
134,919
86,208
Stock issuance costs
(1)
2,195
1,613
(1)
Stock issuance costs consist primarily of underwriters' fees and commissions, and legal and accounting fees.
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.
In
February 2012
, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission for its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”) which permits the issuance by NNN of
16,000,000
shares of common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the DRIP for the year ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Shares of common stock
422,406
764,891
2,101,644
Net proceeds
$
14,817
$
25,407
$
56,102
62
Note 11 – Employee Benefit Plan
:
Effective January 1, 1998, NNN adopted a defined contribution retirement plan (the “Retirement Plan”) covering substantially all of the employees of NNN. The Retirement Plan permits participants to defer a portion of their compensation, as defined in the Retirement Plan, subject to limits established by the Code. NNN generally matches
60
percent of the first
eight
percent of a participant’s contributions. Additionally, NNN may make discretionary contributions. NNN’s contributions to the Retirement Plan for the years ended
December 31, 2014
,
2013
and
2012
totaled
$453,000
,
$342,000
and
$378,000
, respectively.
Note 12 – Dividends
:
The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of common stock dividends per share paid to stockholders for the years ended
December 31
:
2014
2013
2012
Ordinary dividends
$
1.306992
$
1.224568
$
1.199003
Qualified dividends
0.006212
0.056784
0.013346
Capital gain
0.008603
—
0.021358
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain
0.015362
0.000650
0.048890
Nontaxable distributions
0.312831
0.317998
0.277403
$
1.650000
$
1.600000
$
1.560000
The following table outlines the dividends declared and paid for NNN's common stock for the years ended December 31 (in thousands, except per share data):
2014
2013
2012
Dividends
$
204,157
$
189,107
$
167,495
Per share
1.650
1.600
1.560
On
January 15, 2015
, NNN declared a dividend of
$0.420
per share, which was paid
February 17, 2015
to its common stockholders of record as of
January 30, 2015
.
The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of Series C, D and E Preferred Stock dividends per share paid to stockholders for the year ended December 31:
Series E
Series D
Series C
2014
2013
2014
2013
2012
2012
Ordinary dividends
$
1.393700
$
0.741150
$
1.619870
$
1.590323
$
1.255844
$
0.502710
Qualified dividends
0.005738
0.030332
0.006670
0.065084
0.013979
0.005596
Capital gain
0.009177
—
0.010666
—
0.022371
0.008956
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain
0.016385
0.000393
0.019044
0.000843
0.051209
0.020498
$
1.425000
$
0.771875
$
1.656250
$
1.656250
$
1.343403
$
0.537760
63
The following table outlines the dividends declared and paid for NNN's preferred stock for the years ended December 31(in thousands, except per share data):
2014
2013
2012
Series C Preferred Stock
(1)
:
Dividends
$
—
$
—
$
1,979
Per share
—
—
0.537760
Series D Preferred Stock
(2)
:
Dividends
19,047
19,047
15,449
Per share
1.656250
1.656250
1.343403
Series E Preferred Stock
(3)
:
Dividends
16,387
8,876
—
Per share
1.425000
0.771875
—
(1)
The Series C Preferred Stock was redeemed in March 2012. The dividends paid during the quarter ended March 31, 2012 include accumulated and unpaid dividends through the redemption date.
(2)
The Series D Preferred Stock dividends paid during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 include accumulated and unpaid dividends from the issuance date through the declaration date. The Series D Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.
(3)
The Series E Preferred Stock dividends paid during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 include accumulated and unpaid dividends from the issuance date through the declaration date. The Series E Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.
In February
2015
, NNN declared a dividend on its Series D and E Preferred Stock of
41.40625
and
35.62500
cents per depositary share, respectively, payable March 16,
2015
.
Note 13 – Income Taxes
:
For income tax purposes, NNN has taxable REIT subsidiaries in which certain real estate activities are conducted.
NNN treats some depreciation expense and certain other items differently for tax than for financial reporting purposes. The principal differences between NNN’s effective tax rates for the years ended
December 31,
2014
,
2013
and
2012
, and the statutory rates relate to state taxes and nondeductible expenses.
In
2010
, NNN acquired the
21.1%
non-controlling interest in its majority owned and controlled subsidiary, OAMI, pursuant to which OAMI became a wholly owned subsidiary of NNN. As of
December 31,
2014
, OAMI has
no
remaining tax liabilities relating to the built-in gain of its assets.
64
The significant components of the net income tax asset consist of the following at
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
Deferred tax assets:
Cost basis
$
1,233
$
994
Deferred income
113
155
Reserves
2,756
4,728
Credits
434
393
Excess interest expense carryforward
1,689
2,706
Net operating loss carryforward
5,196
5,212
11,421
14,188
Valuation allowance
(619
)
—
Total deferred tax assets
10,802
14,188
Deferred tax liabilities:
Built-in gain
—
(2,163
)
Depreciation
(204
)
(618
)
Other
(110
)
(779
)
Total deferred tax liabilities
(314
)
(3,560
)
Net deferred tax asset
$
10,488
$
10,628
In assessing the ability to realize a deferred tax asset, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The net operating loss carryforwards were generated by NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries. The net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2028. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income management believes it is more likely than not that NNN will realize all of the benefits of these deductible differences that existed as of
December 31, 2014
and
2013
, with the exception of a
2014
capital loss carryover.
As disclosed in Note 1, during the year ended December 31, 2012, NNN identified certain immaterial errors related to deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance. NNN decreased deferred tax assets and the related valuation allowance by
$10,350,000
each to correct a gross-up error and reversed its valuation allowance by
$6,493,000
to reflect an overstatement of its valuation allowance recorded in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009.
Furthermore, NNN determined in the year ended December 31, 2012 that its available sources of income supported realizability of all of its gross deferred tax assets. In 2012, NNN reversed the remaining valuation allowance and recorded an income tax benefit of
$1,178,000
.
The increase in the valuation allowance for the year ended
December 31,
2014
was
$619,000
. There was
no
valuation allowance as of
December 31,
2013
.
65
The income tax benefit (expense) consists of the following components for the years ended
December 31,
(as adjusted) (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Net earnings before income taxes
$
190,844
$
161,230
$
135,124
Provision for income tax benefit (expense):
Current:
Federal
(190
)
(195
)
(136
)
State and local
5
(90
)
(7
)
Deferred:
Federal
(166
)
(790
)
5,871
State and local
108
(10
)
1,163
Total benefit (expense) for income taxes
(243
)
(1,085
)
6,891
Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders
$
190,601
$
160,145
$
142,015
The total income tax benefit (expense) differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal tax rate to net earnings before taxes as follows for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Federal expense at statutory tax rate
$
(64,887
)
$
(54,818
)
$
(45,942
)
Nontaxable income of NNN
63,353
53,178
44,746
State taxes, net of federal benefit
(196
)
(200
)
(139
)
Amortization of built-in gain tax
372
761
613
Expiration of built-in gain tax
1,792
—
—
Other
(58
)
(6
)
(58
)
Valuation allowance (increase) decrease
(619
)
—
7,671
Total tax benefit (expense)
$
(243
)
$
(1,085
)
$
6,891
In June 2006, the FASB issued additional guidance, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements included in
Income Taxes
. The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
NNN, in accordance with FASB guidance included in
Income Taxes
, has analyzed its various federal and state filing positions. NNN believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions are well documented and supported. Additionally, NNN believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to the FASB guidance. In addition, NNN did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of the FASB guidance.
NNN has had no increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits for current or prior years since the date of adoption. Further, no interest or penalties have been included since no reserves were recorded and no significant increases or decreases are expected to occur within the next
12
months. When applicable, such interest and penalties will be recorded in non-operating expenses. The periods that remain open under federal statute are 2011 through 2014. NNN also files in many states with varying open years under statute.
66
Note 14 – Earnings from Discontinued Operations
:
Effective January 1, 2014, NNN has early adopted ASU 2014-08. Under ASU 2014-08, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations are to be presented as discontinued operations. This requires the Company to continue to classify any Property disposal or Property classified as held for sale as of
December 31, 2014
, as discontinued operations prospectively. Therefore, the revenues and expenses related to these properties are presented as discontinued operations as of
December 31, 2014
. The Company did not classify any additional properties as discontinued operations subsequent to December 31, 2013.
The following is a summary of the earnings from discontinued operations for each of the years ended
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2014
2013
2012
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases
$
—
$
1,666
$
6,466
Earned income from direct financing leases
—
190
324
Percentage rent
—
2
27
Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants
23
97
153
Interest and other income from real estate transactions
21
33
13
44
1,988
6,983
Operating expenses:
General and administrative
—
6
5
Real estate
9
203
642
Depreciation and amortization
3
343
1,381
Impairment losses and other charges
63
541
6,215
75
1,093
8,243
Other expenses (revenues):
Interest expense
—
41
137
Real estate acquisition costs
—
209
10
—
250
147
Earnings (loss) before gain on disposition of real estate and income tax expense
(31
)
645
(1,407
)
Gain on disposition of real estate
155
6,272
10,956
Income tax expense
—
(945
)
—
Earnings from discontinued operations attributable to NNN, including noncontrolling interests
124
5,972
9,549
Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests
—
(163
)
(24
)
Earnings from discontinued operations attributable to NNN
$
124
$
5,809
$
9,525
Note 15 – Derivatives
:
In accordance with the guidance on derivatives and hedging, NNN records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.
NNN’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, NNN primarily uses treasury locks, forward swaps (“forward hedges”) and interest rate swaps as part of its cash flow hedging strategy. Treasury locks and forward starting swaps are used to hedge forecasted debt issuances. Treasury locks designated as cash flow hedges lock in the yield/price of a treasury security. Forward swaps also lock the associated swap spread. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges hedging the variable cash flows associated with floating rate debt involve the receipt of variable rate amounts in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying principal amount.
67
For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings.
NNN discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, the derivative is re-designated as a hedging instrument or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. When hedge accounting is discontinued, NNN continues to carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, and recognizes any changes in its fair value in earnings or may choose to cash settle the derivative at that time.
The following table outlines NNN's derivatives which were hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on forecasted issuance of long-term debt (dollars in thousands):
Terminated
Description
Aggregate Notional Amount
Fair Value When Terminated
(1)
Fair Value Deferred In Other Comprehensive Income
(2)
September 2007
Two interest rate hedges
$
100,000
$
3,260
$
3,228
June 2011
Two treasury locks
150,000
5,300
5,218
April 2013
Four forward starting swaps
240,000
3,156
3,141
May 2014
Three forward starting swaps
225,000
6,312
6,312
(1)
Liability
(2)
The amount reported in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the related notes payable.
As of
December 31, 2014
,
$13,579,000
remains in other comprehensive income related to the effective portion of NNN’s previous interest rate hedges. During the years ended
December 31,
2014
,
2013
and
2012
, NNN reclassified
$1,129,000
,
$438,000
and
$231,000
out of other comprehensive income as an increase to interest expense. Over the next
12
months, NNN estimates that an additional
$1,685,000
will be reclassified as an increase in interest expense. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on NNN’s long-term debt.
NNN does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes or currently have any derivatives that are not designated as hedges. NNN had
no
derivative financial instruments outstanding at
December 31, 2014
.
Note 16 – Performance Incentive Plan
:
In June 2007, NNN filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Commission which permits the issuance of up to
5,900,000
shares of common stock pursuant to NNN’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan replaced NNN’s previous Performance Incentive Plan. The 2007 Plan allows NNN to award or grant to key employees, directors and persons performing consulting or advisory services for NNN or its affiliates, stock options, stock awards, stock appreciation rights, Phantom Stock Awards, Performance Awards and Leveraged Stock Purchase Awards, each as defined in the 2007 Plan.
There were no stock options outstanding or exercisable at
December 31, 2014
.
68
Pursuant to the 2007 Plan, NNN has granted and issued shares of restricted stock to certain officers and key associates of NNN. The following summarizes the restricted stock activity for the year ended
December 31, 2014
:
Number
of
Shares
Weighted
Average
Share Price
Non-vested restricted shares, January 1
808,186
$
28.18
Restricted shares granted
371,434
33.38
Restricted shares vested
(162,622
)
23.77
Restricted shares forfeited
—
—
Restricted shares repurchased
(11,354
)
26.69
Non-vested restricted shares, December 31
1,005,644
$
30.93
Compensation expense for the restricted stock which is not contingent upon NNN’s performance goals is determined based upon the fair value at the date of grant and is recognized as the greater of the amount amortized over a straight lined basis or the amount vested over the vesting periods. Vesting periods for officers and key associates of NNN range from
three
to
five
years and generally vest yearly. NNN recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis for awards with only service conditions.
During the years ended
December 31
,
2014
and
2013
, NNN granted
177,433
and
152,901
, respectively, performance based shares subject to its total shareholder return growth after a
three years
period relative to its peers. The shares were granted to certain executive officers and had weighted average grant price of
$33.42
and
$33.73
, respectively, per share. Once the performance criteria are met and the actual number of shares earned is determined, the shares vest immediately. For the
2014
and
2013
grants, the conditions are based on market conditions, and the fair value was determined at the grant date (for a fair value share price of
$21.92
and
$21.54
, respectively). Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period for both grants.
The following summarizes other grants made during the year ended
December 31, 2014
, pursuant to the 2007 Plan.
Shares
Weighted
Average
Share Price
Other share grants under the 2007 Plan:
Directors’ fees
14,999
$
35.17
Deferred directors’ fees
16,061
35.20
31,060
$
35.19
Shares available under the 2007 Plan for grant, end of period
3,588,241
The total compensation cost for share-based payments for the years ended
December 31
,
2014
,
2013
and
2012
, totaled
$9,224,000
,
$7,459,000
and
$8,131,000
, respectively, of such compensation expense. At
December 31, 2014
, NNN had
$12,852,000
of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements under the 2007 Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.4
years. In addition, NNN recognized performance based long-term incentive cash compensation expense of
$729,000
and
$1,684,000
for the years ended December 31,
2013
and
2012
respectively. There was
no
long-term incentive cash recognized in
2014
.
Note 17 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments
:
NNN believes the carrying value of its Credit Facility approximates fair value based upon its nature, terms and variable interest rate. NNN believes that the carrying value of its cash and cash equivalents, mortgages, notes and other receivables, mortgages payable and other liabilities at
December 31,
2014
and
2013
, approximate fair value based upon current market prices of similar issues. At
December 31,
2014
and
2013
, the carrying value and fair value of NNN’s notes payable, collectively, was
$1,813,439,000
and
$1,555,672,000
, respectively, based upon quoted market prices, which are a Level 1 input.
69
Note 18 – Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
:
The following table outlines NNN’s quarterly financial data (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
2014
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Revenues as originally reported
(1)
$
104,064
$
105,613
$
109,856
$
115,315
Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders
$
43,333
$
45,571
$
47,940
$
53,757
Net earnings per share
(2)
:
Basic
$
0.28
$
0.30
$
0.31
$
0.35
Diluted
0.28
0.30
0.31
0.35
2013
Revenues as originally reported
$
92,565
$
96,121
$
100,621
$
103,648
Reclassified to discontinued operations
(100
)
173
155
344
Adjusted revenue
$
92,465
$
96,294
$
100,776
$
103,992
Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders
$
34,066
$
37,486
$
44,352
$
44,241
Net earnings per share
(2)
:
Basic
$
0.26
$
0.28
$
0.29
$
0.29
Diluted
0.25
0.27
0.29
0.29
(1)
No revenues were reclassified to discontinued operations.
(2)
Calculated independently for each period and consequently, the sum of the quarters may differ from the annual amount.
Note 19 – Segment Information
:
For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, NNN’s operations are reported within
one
business segment in the consolidated financial statements and all properties are part of the Properties or Property Portfolio.
Note 20 – Fair Value Measurements
:
NNN currently values its Residuals based upon a valuation which provides a discounted cash flow analysis based upon prepayment speeds, expected loan losses and yield curves. These valuation inputs are generally considered unobservable; therefore, the Residuals are considered Level 3 financial assets. The table below presents a rollforward of the Residuals during the
year ended
December 31, 2014
(dollars in thousands):
Balance at beginning of period
$
11,721
Total gains (losses) – realized/unrealized:
Included in earnings
(256
)
Included in other comprehensive income
1,038
Interest income on Residuals
1,834
Cash received from Residuals
(2,711
)
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net
—
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
—
Balance at end of period
$
11,626
Changes in gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to a change
in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the end of
period
$
163
Note 21 – Major Tenants
:
As of
December 31, 2014
, NNN had
no
tenants that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental and earned income.
70
Note 22 – Commitments and Contingencies
:
In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various other legal actions which management believes are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.
Note 23 – Subsequent Events
:
NNN reviewed all subsequent events and transactions that have occurred after
December 31, 2014
, the date of the consolidated balance sheet. There were no reportable subsequent events or transactions.
71
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Process for Assessment and Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financing Reporting.
NNN carried out an assessment as of
December 31, 2014
, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting. This assessment was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) require NNN to present the conclusions of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer about the effectiveness of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the conclusions of NNN’s management about the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.
CEO and CFO Certifications.
Included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forms of “Certification” of NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The forms of Certification are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K that stockholders are currently reading is the information concerning the assessment referred to in the Section 302 certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in NNN’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to NNN’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and affected by NNN’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and includes those policies and procedures that:
•
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of NNN’s assets;
•
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that NNN’s receipts and expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of management or the Board of Directors; and
•
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of NNN’s assets that could have a material adverse effect on NNN’s financial statements.
Scope of the Assessments.
The assessment by NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the assessment by NNN’s management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting included a review of procedures and discussions with NNN’s management and others at NNN. In the course of the assessments, NNN sought to identify data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, were being undertaken.
NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is also assessed on an ongoing basis by personnel in NNN’s Accounting department and by NNN’s internal auditors in connection with their internal audit activities. The overall goals of these various assessment activities are to monitor NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting and to make modifications as necessary. NNN’s intent in this regard is that the disclosure controls and procedures and the internal control over financial reporting will be maintained and updated (including with improvements and corrections) as conditions warrant. Management also sought to deal with other control matters in the assessment, and in each case if a problem was identified, management considered what revision, improvement and/or correction was necessary to be made in accordance with NNN’s on-going procedures. The assessments of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control
72
over financial reporting is done on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning effectiveness of those controls can be reported in NNN’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Assessment of Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of
December 31, 2014
, NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for NNN. Management used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – 2013 Integrated Framework to assess the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting. Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of
December 31, 2014
, NNN’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Ernst & Young LLP, NNN’s independent registered public accounting firm, audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in connection therewith has issued an attestation report on NNN’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
During the three months ended
December 31, 2014
, there were no changes in NNN’s internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, NNN’s internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls.
Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures or NNN’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within NNN have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management’s override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Item 9B.
Other Information
None.
73
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is included in the Registrant's proxy statement including the information, without limitation, contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Nominees,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Executive Officers,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Code of Business Conduct” and “Security Ownership ”, and such information in such sections is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is included in the Registrant's proxy statement including the information, without limitation, contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Compensation of Directors,” “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report”, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is included in the Registrant's proxy statement including the information, without limitation, contained in the section thereof captioned “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information,” and “Security Ownership”, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is included in the Registrant's proxy statement including the information, without limitation, contained in the section thereof captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is included in the Registrant's proxy statement including the information, without limitation, contained in the section thereof captioned “Audit Committee Report” and “Proposal II: Proposal to Ratify Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
74
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
The following documents are filed as part of this report
(1)
Financial Statements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
38
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013
40
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
41
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
43
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012
46
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
48
(2)
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization and Notes as of December 31, 2014
Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate and Notes as of December 31, 2014
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
(3)
Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report.
3.
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
3.1
First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 6.625% Series D Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated February 21, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 23, 2012, incorporated herein by reference).
3.3
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 5.700% Series E Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated May 29, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 30, 2013, incorporated herein by reference).
3.4
Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated May 1, 2006, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.5
Second Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated December 13, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.6
Third Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated February 13, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 3.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
4.1
Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).
75
4.2
Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.3
Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.4
Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.5
Specimen certificate representing the 6.625% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated February 22, 2012 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.6
Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.20 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.7
Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.8
Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.9
Form of Tenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.500% Notes due 2021 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.10
Form of 5.500% Notes due 2021 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.11
Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.80% Notes due 2022 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.12
Form of 3.800% Notes due 2022 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.13
Form of Twelfth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.300% Notes due 2023 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 9, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.14
Form of 3.300% Notes due 2023 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 9, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.15
Specimen certificate representing the 5.700% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.16
Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
76
4.17
Form of Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.900% Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.18
Form of 3.900% Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.
Material Contracts
10.1
2007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8
Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.10
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.13
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
77
10.14
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2011, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Performance between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Service between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Special Grant between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.18
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.19
Employment Agreement dated as of January 2, 2014, between the Registrant and Stephen A. Horn, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.20
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2014, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 28, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
12.
Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).
21.
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).
23.
Consent of Independent Accountants
23.1
Ernst & Young LLP dated February 20, 2015 (filed herewith).
24.
Power of Attorney (included on signature page).
31.
Section 302 Certifications
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.
Section 906 Certifications
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
99.
Additional Exhibits
99.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).
78
101.
Interactive Data File
101.1
The following materials from National Retail Properties, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014, are formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of comprehensive income, (iii) consolidated statements of cash flows, and (iv) notes to consolidated financial statements.
79
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the
20th day of February, 2015
.
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
By:
/s/ Craig Macnab
Craig Macnab
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
80
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints each of Craig Macnab and Kevin B. Habicht as his attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this report and to file same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, granting unto such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ Craig Macnab
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
February 20, 2015
Craig Macnab
/s/ Ted B. Lanier
Lead Director
February 20, 2015
Ted B. Lanier
/s/ Don DeFosset
Director
February 20, 2015
Don DeFosset
/s/ David M. Fick
Director
February 20, 2015
David M. Fick
/s/ Edward J. Fritsch
Director
February 20, 2015
Edward J. Fritsch
/s/ Richard B. Jennings
Director
February 20, 2015
Richard B. Jennings
/s/ Robert C. Legler
Director
February 20, 2015
Robert C. Legler
/s/ Robert Martinez
Director
February 20, 2015
Robert Martinez
/s/ Kevin B. Habicht
Director, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer),
Executive Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Treasurer
February 20, 2015
Kevin B. Habicht
81
Exhibit Index
3.
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
3.1
First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 6.625% Series D Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated February 21, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 23, 2012, incorporated herein by reference).
3.3
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 5.700% Series E Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated May 29, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 30, 2013, incorporated herein by reference).
3.4
Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated May 1, 2006, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.5
Second Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated December 13, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.6
Third Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated February 13, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 3.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
4.1
Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).
4.2
Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.3
Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.4
Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.5
Specimen certificate representing the 6.625% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated February 22, 2012 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.6
Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.20 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.7
Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.8
Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
82
4.9
Form of Tenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.500% Notes due 2021 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1
Form of 5.500% Notes due 2021 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.11
Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.80% Notes due 2022 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.12
Form of 3.800% Notes due 2022 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.13
Form of Twelfth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.300% Notes due 2023 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 9, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.14
Form of 3.300% Notes due 2023 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 9, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.15
Specimen certificate representing the 5.700% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.16
Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.17
Form of Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.900% Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.18
Form of 3.900% Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.
Material Contracts
10.1
2007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
83
10.7
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8
Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.10
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.13
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.14
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2011, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Performance between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Service between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Service between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.18
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.19
Employment Agreement dated as of January 2, 2014, between the Registrant and Stephen A. Horn, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.20
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2014, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 28, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
12.
Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).
21.
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).
23.
Consent of Independent Accountants
23.1
Ernst & Young LLP dated February 20, 2015 (filed herewith).
24.
Power of Attorney (included on signature page).
84
31.
Section 302 Certifications
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.
Section 906 Certifications
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
99.
Additional Exhibits
99.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).
101.
Interactive Data File
101.1
The following materials from National Retail Properties, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014, are formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of comprehensive income, (iii) consolidated statements of cash flows, and (iv) notes to consolidated financial statements.
85
Table of Contents
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
December 31, 2014
(Dollars in thousands)
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
7-Eleven:
Tampa, FL
—
1,081
917
—
—
1,070
917
1,987
362
1999
12/98
(g)
40
Austin, TX
—
259
1,361
—
—
259
1,361
1,620
170
1985
11/11
25
Austin, TX
—
900
3,571
—
—
900
3,571
4,471
319
2004
11/11
35
Austin, TX
—
1,101
2,987
—
—
1,101
2,987
4,088
267
2006
11/11
35
Beaumont, TX
—
115
1,543
—
—
115
1,543
1,658
161
1996
11/11
30
Beaumont, TX
—
124
2,968
—
—
124
2,968
3,092
309
1996
11/11
30
Beaumont, TX
—
239
2,031
—
—
239
2,031
2,270
181
2002
11/11
35
Bloomington, TX
—
38
3,093
—
—
38
3,093
3,131
387
1985
11/11
25
Bryan, TX
—
479
3,561
—
—
479
3,561
4,040
371
2000
11/11
30
Canyon Lake, TX
—
144
1,830
—
—
144
1,830
1,974
229
1977
11/11
25
Cedar Park, TX
—
833
1,705
—
—
833
1,705
2,538
152
2002
11/11
35
College Station, TX
—
393
3,342
—
—
393
3,342
3,735
348
2000
11/11
30
Corpus Christi, TX
—
661
2,624
—
—
661
2,624
3,285
273
1999
11/11
30
Corpus Christi, TX
—
412
2,356
—
—
412
2,356
2,768
245
1999
11/11
30
Corpus Christi, TX
—
450
1,370
—
—
450
1,370
1,820
143
1996
11/11
30
Corpus Christi, TX
—
383
3,093
—
—
383
3,093
3,476
276
2006
11/11
35
Edinburg, TX
—
431
2,193
—
—
431
2,193
2,624
228
1999
11/11
30
Edna, TX
—
67
1,897
—
—
67
1,897
1,964
237
1976
11/11
25
Harlingen, TX
—
230
2,356
—
—
230
2,356
2,586
245
2000
11/11
30
Kingsland, TX
—
153
2,691
—
—
153
2,691
2,844
336
1972
11/11
25
Kingsville, TX
—
163
1,485
—
—
163
1,485
1,648
186
1990
11/11
25
Laredo, TX
—
335
2,509
—
—
335
2,509
2,844
261
1999
11/11
30
Laredo, TX
—
421
3,016
—
—
421
3,016
3,437
314
1998
11/11
30
Laredo, TX
—
412
1,476
—
—
412
1,476
1,888
154
2001
11/11
30
Laredo, TX
—
441
1,935
—
—
441
1,935
2,376
173
2002
11/11
35
Laredo, TX
—
938
5,829
—
—
938
5,829
6,767
607
1995
11/11
30
Mercedes, TX
—
556
1,523
—
—
556
1,523
2,079
159
1998
11/11
30
Palacios, TX
—
29
1,667
—
—
29
1,667
1,696
208
1984
11/11
25
Pflugerville, TX
—
996
2,336
—
—
996
2,336
3,332
209
2002
11/11
35
Portland, TX
—
488
4,710
—
—
488
4,710
5,198
491
1999
11/11
30
Rio Bravo, TX
—
355
1,351
—
—
355
1,351
1,706
121
2002
11/11
35
Rockport, TX
—
660
4,269
—
—
660
4,269
4,929
381
2008
11/11
35
Round Rock, TX
—
661
1,140
—
—
661
1,140
1,801
119
2000
11/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
441
1,313
—
—
441
1,313
1,754
137
1999
11/11
30
San Juan, TX
—
565
1,179
—
—
565
1,179
1,744
123
1999
11/11
30
Victoria, TX
—
431
2,298
—
—
431
2,298
2,729
239
1986
11/11
30
Victoria, TX
—
259
2,346
—
—
259
2,346
2,605
244
1984
11/11
30
West Orange, TX
—
220
2,088
—
—
220
2,088
2,308
217
1993
11/11
30
Winnie, TX
—
115
4,566
—
—
115
4,566
4,681
408
2002
11/11
35
Austin, TX
—
1,215
4,524
—
—
1,215
4,524
5,739
393
2004
12/11
35
Austin, TX
—
488
2,163
—
—
488
2,163
2,651
219
2000
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
938
1,436
—
—
938
1,436
2,374
146
1998
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
756
2,870
—
—
756
2,870
3,626
291
1999
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
679
1,905
—
—
679
1,905
2,584
193
1999
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
775
4,677
—
—
775
4,677
5,452
474
1996
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
861
3,004
—
—
861
3,004
3,865
305
2001
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
880
1,790
—
—
880
1,790
2,670
181
1998
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
689
1,732
—
—
689
1,732
2,421
176
1999
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
612
3,061
—
—
612
3,061
3,673
310
1999
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
612
2,775
—
—
612
2,775
3,387
281
1999
12/11
30
Cedar Park, TX
—
536
1,914
—
—
536
1,914
2,450
194
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
411
2,555
—
—
411
2,555
2,966
259
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
603
2,048
—
—
603
2,048
2,651
208
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
517
2,670
—
—
517
2,670
3,187
271
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
632
1,991
—
—
632
1,991
2,623
202
2001
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
469
2,727
—
—
469
2,727
3,196
276
1998
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
947
2,535
—
—
947
2,535
3,482
257
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
909
1,359
—
—
909
1,359
2,268
138
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
631
2,851
—
—
631
2,851
3,482
289
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
766
1,474
—
—
766
1,474
2,240
149
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
412
2,010
—
—
412
2,010
2,422
204
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
985
3,253
—
—
985
3,253
4,238
330
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
679
2,937
—
—
679
2,937
3,616
298
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
919
2,344
—
—
919
2,344
3,263
204
2002
12/11
35
San Antonio, TX
—
545
3,148
—
—
545
3,148
3,693
319
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
899
2,593
—
—
899
2,593
3,492
225
2002
12/11
35
Universal City, TX
—
699
1,675
—
—
699
1,675
2,374
170
2001
12/11
30
Belpre, OH
—
408
759
—
—
408
759
1,167
14
1990
07/14
25
Charleston, WV
—
549
729
—
—
549
729
1,278
11
1995
07/14
30
Charleston, WV
—
689
974
—
—
689
974
1,663
15
1970
07/14
30
Clarksburg, WV
—
390
613
—
—
390
613
1,003
11
1978
07/14
25
Mannington, WV
—
218
745
—
—
218
745
963
11
1996
07/14
30
N. Belle Vernon, PA
—
438
1,165
—
—
438
1,165
1,603
21
1996
07/14
25
New Castle, PA
—
292
617
—
—
292
617
909
9
1983
07/14
30
Parkersburg, WV
—
298
782
—
—
298
782
1,080
14
1988
07/14
25
Parkersburg, WV
—
422
739
—
—
422
739
1,161
11
1985
07/14
30
Weston, WV
—
114
583
—
—
114
583
697
9
1995
07/14
30
Academy:
Beaumont, TX (n)
—
1,424
2,449
—
—
1,424
2,449
3,873
967
1992
03/99
40
Houston, TX
—
2,311
1,628
—
—
2,311
1,628
3,939
643
1976
03/99
40
Franklin, TN
—
1,807
2,108
—
—
1,589
2,108
3,697
671
1999
06/05
30
Ace Hardware and Lighting:
Bourbonnais, IL
—
298
1,329
—
—
298
1,329
1,627
478
1997
11/98
37
Advance Auto Parts:
Miami, FL
—
867
—
1,035
—
867
1,035
1,902
247
2005
12/04
(g)
40
Richmond, VA
—
193
1,268
—
—
193
1,268
1,461
37
2008
02/14
30
Adventure Landing:
Jacksonville Beach, FL
—
3,615
5,636
—
—
3,615
5,636
9,251
1,212
1995
04/11
30
Jacksonville, FL
—
721
861
—
—
721
861
1,582
265
1983
04/11
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-1
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Raleigh, NC
—
1,841
3,124
—
—
1,841
3,124
4,965
645
1989
04/11
25
St. Augustine, FL
—
797
289
—
—
797
289
1,086
130
1999
04/11
30
Tonawanda, NY
—
205
927
—
—
205
927
1,132
279
1991
04/11
25
Affordable Care:
Asheville, NC
—
467
576
—
—
467
576
1,043
9
2005
07/14
30
Conover, NC
—
187
623
—
—
187
623
810
10
2002
07/14
30
Poland, OH
—
231
650
—
—
231
650
881
12
2001
07/14
25
Wilmington, NC
—
398
565
—
—
398
565
963
9
2002
07/14
30
Aldi:
Cutler Bay, FL
—
989
1,479
205
—
989
1,684
2,673
709
1995
06/96
40
All Star Sports:
Wichita, KS
—
1,551
965
152
—
1,551
1,117
2,668
194
1987
05/07
40
Wichita, KS
—
3,275
1,631
167
—
3,275
1,798
5,073
322
1988
05/07
40
Amazing Jake's:
Plano, TX
—
5,705
17,049
18
—
5,705
17,067
22,772
3,147
1982
07/08
35
AMC Theatre:
Bloomington, IN
—
2,338
4,000
—
—
2,338
4,000
6,338
1,167
1987
09/07
25
Brighton, CO
—
1,070
5,491
—
—
1,070
5,491
6,561
1,001
2005
09/07
40
Castle Rock, CO
—
2,905
5,002
—
—
2,905
5,002
7,907
912
2005
09/07
40
Evansville, IN
—
1,300
4,269
—
—
1,300
4,269
5,569
889
1999
09/07
35
Galesburg, IL
—
1,205
2,441
—
—
1,205
2,441
3,646
445
2003
09/07
40
Machesney Park, IL
—
3,018
8,770
—
—
3,018
8,770
11,788
1,599
2005
09/07
40
Michigan City, IN
—
1,996
8,422
—
—
1,996
8,422
10,418
1,535
2005
09/07
40
Muncie, IN
—
1,243
5,512
—
—
1,243
5,512
6,755
1,005
2005
09/07
40
Naperville, IL
—
6,141
11,624
—
—
6,141
11,624
17,765
2,119
2006
09/07
40
New Lenox, IL
—
6,778
10,980
—
—
6,778
10,980
17,758
2,002
2004
09/07
40
Chicago, IL
—
7,257
10,955
—
—
7,257
10,955
18,212
1,906
2007
01/08
40
Johnson Creek, WI
—
1,433
3,932
—
—
1,433
3,932
5,365
782
1997
01/08
35
Lake Delton, WI
—
2,063
8,366
—
—
2,063
8,366
10,429
1,663
1999
01/08
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-2
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Quincy, IL
—
1,297
2,850
—
—
1,297
2,850
4,147
567
1982
01/08
35
Schererville, IN
—
6,619
14,225
—
—
6,619
14,225
20,844
3,299
1996
01/08
30
American Family Care:
Mobile, AL
—
843
562
348
—
843
910
1,753
218
1997
12/01
40
Alcoa, TN
—
1,221
—
1,730
—
1,221
1,730
2,951
56
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Cullman, AL
—
541
—
1,517
—
541
1,517
2,058
46
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Decatur, AL
—
460
1,283
—
—
460
1,283
1,743
75
2010
12/12
35
Nashville, TN
—
377
—
1,403
—
377
1,403
1,780
37
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Pace, FL
—
738
—
1,459
—
738
1,459
2,197
44
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Woodstock, GA
—
563
—
1,653
—
563
1,653
2,216
36
2014
12/12
(m)
40
Fairhope, AL
—
(1
)
1,929
—
—
(1
)
1,929
1,929
90
2012
02/13
40
Dothan, AL
—
667
—
1,400
—
667
1,400
2,067
45
2013
02/13
(m)
40
Auburn, AL
—
663
—
1,835
—
663
1,835
2,498
48
2013
03/13
(m)
40
Milton, GA
—
577
1,526
—
—
577
1,526
2,103
68
2012
03/13
40
Roswell, GA
—
814
—
1,851
—
816
1,851
2,667
17
2014
04/13
(m)
40
Marietta, GA
—
432
—
1,846
—
432
1,846
2,278
40
2014
04/13
(m)
40
Mt. Juliet, TN
—
875
1,566
—
—
875
1,566
2,441
57
2013
07/13
40
Chattanooga, TN
—
469
—
1,626
—
469
1,626
2,095
36
2014
07/13
(m)
40
Columbus, GA
—
550
—
1,520
—
550
1,520
2,070
33
2014
07/13
(m)
40
Birmingham, AL
—
445
—
1,640
—
445
1,640
2,085
39
2005
08/13
(m)
40
Hendersonville, TN
—
660
1,640
—
—
660
1,640
2,300
46
2013
11/13
40
Calera, AL
—
606
—
1,673
—
606
1,673
2,279
19
2014
12/13
(m)
40
Spring Hill, TN
—
589
—
1,509
—
589
1,509
2,098
(q)
2014
02/14
(m)
(q)
Athens, AL
—
497
—
1,527
—
497
1,527
2,024
(q)
2014
03/14
(m)
(q)
Panama City Beach, FL
—
995
—
1,455
—
995
1,455
2,450
(q)
2014
04/14
(m)
(q)
Gadsden, AL
—
527
—
1,265
—
527
1,265
1,792
(q)
2014
05/14
(m)
(q)
Knoxville, TN
—
2,021
—
—
—
2,021
(e)
2,021
(e)
(e)
08/14
(m)
(e)
Fort Oglethorpe, GA
—
736
—
—
—
736
(e)
736
(e)
(e)
08/14
(m)
(e)
American Freight:
Glen Allen, VA
—
889
1,948
—
—
889
1,948
2,837
905
1996
05/96
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-3
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
American Retail Service:
Lincoln City, OR
—
1,099
1,560
—
—
1,099
1,560
2,659
127
1973
12/12
25
Salem, OR
—
433
1,627
735
—
433
2,362
2,795
131
1999
12/12
40
Yuma, AZ
—
1,118
1,878
—
—
1,118
1,878
2,996
153
1987
12/12
25
Amoco:
Miami, FL
—
969
—
—
—
969
(i)
969
(i)
(i)
05/03
(i)
Sunrise, FL
—
949
—
—
—
949
(i)
949
(i)
(i)
06/03
(i)
Deerfield Beach, FL
—
770
274
26
—
770
300
1,070
63
1980
12/05
40
Amscot:
Tampa, FL
—
1,160
352
—
—
1,160
352
1,512
81
1981
10/05
40
Orlando, FL
—
764
—
891
—
764
891
1,655
189
2006
12/05
40
Orlando, FL
—
664
1,011
—
—
664
983
1,647
205
2006
12/05
(g)
40
Orlando, FL
—
358
—
900
—
358
900
1,258
193
2006
02/06
(g)
40
Orlando, FL
—
546
—
872
—
546
872
1,418
191
2006
02/06
(g)
40
Clearwater, FL
—
456
332
—
—
456
332
788
69
1967
09/06
40
Applebee's:
Ballwin, MO
—
1,496
1,404
—
—
1,496
1,404
2,900
458
1995
12/01
40
Cincinnati, OH
—
312
898
—
—
312
898
1,210
131
2002
08/10
30
Crestview Hills, KY
—
1,069
1,367
—
—
1,069
1,367
2,436
239
1993
08/10
25
Danville, KY
—
641
1,645
—
—
641
1,645
2,286
240
2003
08/10
30
Florence, KY
—
1,075
1,488
—
—
1,075
1,488
2,563
260
1988
08/10
25
Frankfort, KY
—
862
1,610
—
—
862
1,610
2,472
235
1993
08/10
30
Georgetown, KY
—
809
1,437
—
—
809
1,437
2,246
210
2001
08/10
30
Hilliard, OH
—
808
1,846
—
—
808
1,846
2,654
269
1998
08/10
30
Mason, OH
—
545
941
—
—
545
941
1,486
137
1997
08/10
30
Maysville, KY
—
513
1,387
—
—
513
1,387
1,900
173
2005
08/10
35
Nicholasville, KY
—
454
1,077
—
—
454
1,077
1,531
157
2000
08/10
30
Troy, OH
—
645
862
—
—
645
862
1,507
151
1996
08/10
25
Grove City, OH
—
511
1,415
—
—
511
1,415
1,926
198
1990
10/10
30
Kettering, OH
—
359
1,043
—
—
359
1,043
1,402
125
2005
10/10
35
Mesa, AZ
—
974
1,514
—
—
974
1,514
2,488
212
1992
10/10
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-4
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Mesa, AZ
—
748
1,734
—
—
748
1,734
2,482
243
1998
10/10
30
Mt. Sterling, KY
—
510
1,392
—
—
510
1,392
1,902
167
2000
10/10
35
Phoenix, AZ
—
781
1,456
—
—
781
1,456
2,237
204
1,995
10/10
30
Phoenix, AZ
—
458
1,099
—
—
458
1,099
1,557
132
2004
10/10
35
Angola, IN
—
478
1,533
—
—
478
1,533
2,011
20
2002
07/14
35
Arby's:
Colorado Springs, CO
—
206
534
—
—
206
534
740
174
1998
12/01
40
Thomson, GA
—
268
504
—
—
268
504
772
164
1997
12/01
40
Washington Courthouse, OH
—
157
546
—
—
157
546
703
178
1998
12/01
40
Whitmore Lake, MI
—
171
469
—
—
171
469
640
153
1993
12/01
40
Indianapolis, IN
—
285
686
—
—
285
686
971
10
1998
07/14
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
456
830
—
—
456
830
1,286
11
2005
07/14
35
ARCO ampm:
Casa Grande, AZ
—
2,340
1,894
83
—
2,340
1,905
4,245
366
1993
05/08
35
Gilbert, AZ
—
1,317
1,304
85
—
1,166
1,325
2,491
262
1996
05/08
35
Globe, AZ
—
762
2,148
114
—
762
2,180
2,942
429
1998
05/08
35
Mesa, AZ
—
1,332
1,367
92
—
1,156
1,385
2,541
315
1986
05/08
30
Mesa, AZ
—
2,219
2,140
89
—
2,219
2,170
4,389
375
2000
05/08
40
Prescott, AZ
—
1,266
1,261
118
—
1,266
1,294
2,560
262
1997
05/08
35
Scottsdale, AZ
—
1,529
1,373
240
—
1,529
1,451
2,980
315
1999
05/08
35
Sedona, AZ
—
1,281
1,324
107
—
1,281
1,345
2,626
234
2000
05/08
40
Tucson, AZ
—
1,105
1,336
111
—
1,105
1,358
2,463
269
1992
05/08
35
Tucson, AZ
—
1,457
1,619
125
—
1,457
1,651
3,108
329
1995
05/08
35
Tucson, AZ
—
1,083
1,599
86
—
1,083
1,620
2,703
318
1992
05/08
35
Tucson, AZ
—
1,223
1,911
102
—
1,223
1,932
3,155
377
1996
05/08
35
Soldotna, AK
—
180
891
—
—
180
891
1,071
16
1985
07/14
25
Ashley Furniture:
Altamonte Springs, FL
—
2,906
4,877
315
—
2,906
5,192
8,098
2,219
1997
09/97
40
Florissant, MO
—
896
1,057
3,058
—
899
4,113
5,012
507
1996
04/03
(g)
40
Louisville, KY
—
1,667
4,989
—
—
1,667
4,989
6,656
1,221
2005
03/05
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-5
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
At Home:
Douglasville, GA
—
1,588
3,916
—
—
1,588
3,916
5,504
498
1987
06/12
20
Humble, TX
—
3,559
5,046
—
—
3,559
5,046
8,605
513
2001
06/12
25
Noblesville, IN
—
1,870
4,241
—
—
1,870
4,241
6,111
539
1995
06/12
20
Sandston, VA
—
1,972
6,599
—
—
1,972
6,599
8,571
671
1996
06/12
25
Greensboro, NC
—
2,121
6,460
—
—
2,121
6,460
8,581
440
1998
12/12
30
Greenville, SC
—
1,892
5,404
—
—
1,892
5,404
7,296
81
1996
08/14
25
Hilliard, OH
—
1,747
4,642
—
—
1,747
4,642
6,389
48
1994
10/14
20
AT&T:
Cincinnati, OH
—
297
443
347
—
312
775
1,087
225
1999
06/98
40
Babies R Us:
Arlington, TX
—
831
2,612
—
—
831
2,612
3,443
1,209
1996
06/96
40
Independence, MO
—
1,679
2,302
115
—
1,679
2,417
4,096
776
1996
12/01
40
BankUnited:
Orlando, FL
—
257
287
—
—
257
72
329
9
1988
07/92
30
Barnes & Noble:
Brandon, FL
—
1,476
1,527
—
—
1,476
1,527
3,003
763
1995
08/94
(f)
40
Glendale, CO
—
3,245
2,722
—
—
3,245
2,722
5,967
1,378
1994
09/94
40
Houston, TX
—
3,308
2,396
—
—
3,308
2,396
5,704
1,153
1995
10/94
(f)
40
Plantation, FL
—
3,616
3,498
—
—
3,616
960
4,576
39
1996
05/95
(f)
30
Freehold, NJ (n)
—
2,917
2,261
—
—
2,917
2,261
5,178
1,069
1995
01/96
40
Dayton, OH
—
1,413
3,325
—
—
1,413
3,325
4,738
1,446
1996
05/97
40
Redding, CA
—
497
1,626
—
—
497
1,626
2,123
713
1997
06/97
40
Memphis, TN
—
1,574
2,242
—
—
1,574
2,242
3,816
612
1997
09/97
40
Marlton, NJ
—
2,831
4,319
—
—
2,709
4,319
7,028
1,741
1995
11/98
40
Batteries Plus Bulbs:
Sunrise, FL
—
287
424
—
—
287
424
711
112
1979
05/04
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-6
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Bealls:
Sarasota, FL
—
1,078
1,795
—
—
1,078
1,795
2,873
513
1996
09/97
40
Beautiful America Dry Cleaners:
Orlando, FL
19
(h)
40
111
—
—
40
111
151
30
2001
02/04
40
Bed Bath & Beyond:
Glen Allen, VA
—
1,184
2,843
179
—
1,184
3,021
4,205
920
1997
06/98
40
Glendale, AZ
—
1,082
—
2,758
—
1,082
2,758
3,840
1,066
1999
12/98
(g)
40
Midland, MI
—
231
—
2,705
—
231
2,705
2,936
550
2006
07/03
40
Colonie, NY
—
3,119
4,130
—
—
3,119
4,130
7,249
52
1967
08/14
30
Bell Carolina (Taco Bell):
Fayetteville, NC
—
289
1,205
—
—
289
1,205
1,494
22
1998
06/14
30
Fayetteville, NC
—
607
1,135
—
—
607
1,135
1,742
25
1982
06/14
25
Fayetteville, NC
—
686
1,631
—
—
686
1,631
2,317
35
1992
06/14
25
Fayetteville, NC
—
269
1,771
—
—
269
1,771
2,040
38
1993
06/14
25
Fayetteville, NC
—
388
1,552
—
—
388
1,552
1,940
28
1996
06/14
30
Fayetteville, NC
—
448
1,334
—
—
448
1,334
1,782
24
1998
06/14
30
Fayetteville, NC
—
149
1,652
—
—
149
1,652
1,801
36
1988
06/14
25
Fayetteville, NC
—
497
1,691
—
—
497
1,691
2,188
31
2008
06/14
30
Fayetteville, NC
—
298
1,989
—
—
298
1,989
2,287
36
2005
06/14
30
Holly Ridge, NC
—
189
1,791
—
—
189
1,791
1,980
28
2012
06/14
35
Hope Mills, NC
—
438
2,138
—
—
438
2,138
2,576
46
1990
06/14
25
Jacksonville, NC
—
398
2,069
—
—
398
2,069
2,467
37
1994
06/14
30
Jacksonville, NC
—
428
2,327
—
—
428
2,327
2,755
50
1993
06/14
25
Jacksonville, NC
—
388
2,347
—
—
388
2,347
2,735
36
2007
06/14
35
Jacksonville, NC
—
577
1,304
—
—
577
1,304
1,881
20
2013
06/14
35
Leland, NC
—
289
1,205
—
—
289
1,205
1,494
19
2008
06/14
35
Lumberton, NC
—
368
2,208
—
—
368
2,208
2,576
40
2003
06/14
30
Midway Park, NC
—
467
2,069
—
—
467
2,069
2,536
45
1993
06/14
25
Pembroke, NC
—
438
1,095
—
—
438
1,095
1,533
20
2008
06/14
30
Saint Pauls, NC
—
419
767
—
—
419
767
1,186
14
2008
06/14
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-7
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Shallotte, NC
—
329
827
—
—
329
827
1,156
13
2011
06/14
35
Spring Lake, NC
—
408
2,009
—
—
408
2,009
2,417
31
2009
06/14
35
Whiteville, NC
—
179
1,315
—
—
179
1,315
1,494
20
2010
06/14
35
Wilmington, NC
—
547
1,423
—
—
547
1,423
1,970
22
2013
06/14
35
Wilmington, NC
—
239
1,463
—
—
239
1,463
1,702
23
2013
06/14
35
Wilmington, NC
—
587
2,277
—
—
587
2,277
2,864
35
2006
06/14
35
Best Buy:
Brandon, FL
—
2,985
2,772
—
—
2,985
2,772
5,757
1,239
1996
02/97
40
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
—
3,709
2,359
—
—
3,709
2,359
6,068
1,035
1970
06/97
40
Rockville, MD
—
6,233
3,419
—
—
6,233
3,419
9,652
1,492
1995
07/97
40
Fairfax, VA
—
3,052
3,218
—
—
3,052
3,218
6,270
1,398
1995
08/97
40
St. Petersburg, FL
—
4,032
2,611
—
—
4,032
2,611
6,643
939
1997
09/97
35
North Fayette, PA
—
2,331
2,293
—
—
2,331
2,293
4,624
948
1997
06/98
40
Denver, CO
—
8,882
4,373
—
—
8,882
4,373
13,255
1,480
1991
06/01
40
Albuquerque, NM
—
2,157
3,132
—
—
2,157
3,132
5,289
412
1992
09/11
25
Arlington, TX
—
1,372
3,890
—
—
1,372
3,890
5,262
512
1991
09/11
25
Beaumont, TX
—
614
2,177
—
—
614
2,177
2,791
358
1992
09/11
20
Dallas, TX
—
906
—
—
—
906
(e)
906
(e)
1990
09/11
(e)
Fort Collins, CO
—
2,054
3,346
—
—
2,054
3,346
5,400
441
1992
09/11
25
Fort Worth, TX
—
687
2,177
—
—
687
2,177
2,864
239
1992
09/11
30
Houston, TX
—
1,409
3,095
—
—
1,409
3,095
4,504
340
1992
09/11
30
Matteson, IL
—
384
2,089
—
—
384
2,089
2,473
344
1992
09/11
20
Nashua, NH
—
1,028
7,052
—
—
1,028
7,052
8,080
774
1999
09/11
30
North Attleborough, MA
—
2,761
4,165
—
—
2,761
4,165
6,926
457
1999
09/11
30
Schaumburg, IL
—
3,170
4,784
—
—
3,170
4,784
7,954
787
1965
09/11
20
Virginia Beach, VA
—
3,140
4,276
—
—
3,140
4,276
7,416
469
1999
09/11
30
Big Lots:
Dover, NJ
—
1,138
3,238
732
—
1,138
3,970
5,108
1,377
1995
11/98
40
BJ's Wholesale Club:
Orlando, FL
1,466
(h)
3,271
8,627
367
—
3,271
8,979
12,250
2,443
2001
02/04
40
Attleboro, MA
—
4,988
26,364
—
—
4,988
26,364
31,352
2,893
1993
09/11
30
Fairfax, VA
—
6,792
14,941
—
—
6,792
14,941
21,733
1,639
1992
09/11
30
Hamilton, NJ
—
3,166
29,373
—
—
3,166
29,373
32,539
2,762
2002
09/11
35
Hialeah, FL
—
4,792
14,067
—
—
4,792
14,067
18,859
1,543
2000
09/11
30
Roxbury, NJ
—
3,040
16,168
—
—
3,040
16,168
19,208
2,129
1993
09/11
25
W. Hartford, CT
—
2,846
14,299
—
—
2,846
14,299
17,145
1,569
1996
09/11
30
Black Fox Beauty Supply:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
125
137
195
—
125
332
457
115
1967
11/93
40
Blend Frozen Yogurt:
Lapeer, MI
—
63
457
—
—
63
436
499
83
2007
10/05
40
BMW:
Duluth, GA
—
4,434
4,080
6,559
—
4,504
10,639
15,143
2,499
1984
12/01
40
Bombones Sports Bar:
Dallas, TX
—
1,138
1,025
—
—
1,138
1,025
2,163
334
1994
12/01
40
Bonefish:
Mobile, AL
—
801
2,137
—
—
801
2,137
2,938
170
2006
03/12
35
Pensacola, FL
—
734
2,003
—
—
734
2,003
2,737
160
2004
03/12
35
Books-A-Million:
Newark, DE
—
2,394
4,789
—
—
2,366
4,789
7,155
2,398
1994
12/94
40
Bangor, ME
—
1,547
2,487
—
—
1,547
2,487
4,034
1,152
1996
06/96
40
Borough of Abbottstown:
Abbottstown, PA
—
55
200
—
—
55
200
255
45
2000
01/06
40
Boston Market:
Geneva, IL
—
653
601
—
—
669
518
1,187
174
1996
12/01
40
N. Olmsted, OH
—
602
461
—
—
602
389
991
128
1996
12/01
40
Novi, MI
—
836
651
—
—
836
298
1,134
101
1995
12/01
40
BP:
Jeannette, PA
—
79
235
—
—
79
235
314
4
1995
07/14
25
Buck's:
St. Louis, MO
—
776
—
3,822
—
776
3,822
4,598
545
2009
12/07
(m)
40
Glendale Heights, IL
—
1,662
—
—
—
1,662
(e)
1,662
(e)
(e)
03/14
(m)
(e)
Buffalo Wild Wings:
Michigan City, IN
—
163
492
—
—
163
492
655
160
1996
12/01
40
Bugaboo Creek:
Rochester, NY
—
792
1,535
—
—
792
1,535
2,327
289
1995
06/07
40
Burger King:
Colonial Heights, VA
—
662
610
—
—
662
610
1,272
199
1997
12/01
40
Burlington Coat Factory:
Lacey, WA
—
2,777
7,082
3,388
—
2,777
10,471
13,248
3,165
1992
02/97
40
Buybacks Entertainment:
Lafayette, LA
—
603
1,149
30
—
603
1,179
1,782
263
1999
12/05
40
C&C Gymnastics:
Augusta, GA
—
177
674
—
—
177
674
851
220
1998
12/01
40
Caliber Collision:
Alvin, TX
—
400
712
—
—
400
712
1,112
138
1984
02/11
20
Galveston, TX
—
361
789
—
—
361
789
1,150
153
1965
02/11
20
Houston, TX
—
348
1,731
—
—
348
1,731
2,079
268
1987
02/11
25
Copperas Cove, TX
—
269
1,436
—
—
269
1,436
1,705
121
1972
01/12
35
Killeen, TX
—
408
2,171
—
—
408
2,171
2,579
257
1986
01/12
25
Austin, TX
—
1,071
3,412
—
—
1,071
3,412
4,483
392
1975
02/12
25
Gilbert, AZ
—
474
1,543
—
—
474
1,543
2,017
135
2003
05/12
30
Spring, TX
—
913
2,307
—
—
913
2,307
3,220
195
2006
06/12
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-8
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Tomball, TX
—
414
1,281
—
—
414
1,281
1,695
93
2009
06/12
35
Edmond, OK
—
472
1,437
—
—
472
1,437
1,909
86
1964
03/13
30
Camping World:
Vacaville, CA
—
2,467
6,575
—
—
2,467
6,575
9,042
838
2008
07/10
35
North Little Rock, AR
—
1,198
3,348
2,237
—
1,280
5,513
6,793
465
2007
09/10
(o)
35
Strafford, MO
—
1,278
3,694
1,614
—
1,846
5,308
7,154
453
2007
09/10
(o)
35
Avondale, AZ
—
1,976
3,040
3,200
—
1,976
6,239
8,215
465
2009
05/11
(o)
35
Mesa, AZ
—
3,972
2,046
981
—
3,975
3,027
7,002
340
1983
05/11
25
Bowling Green, KY
—
584
2,481
—
—
584
2,481
3,065
245
2007
07/11
35
Council Bluffs, IA
—
2,013
2,806
—
—
2,013
2,806
4,819
277
2008
07/11
35
Roanoke, VA
—
2,046
5,050
—
—
2,046
5,050
7,096
499
2008
07/11
35
Golden, CO
—
5,516
—
6,544
—
6,446
6,544
12,990
443
2012
10/11
(m)
40
Belleville, MI
—
1,156
2,071
—
—
1,156
2,071
3,227
252
1986
12/11
25
Kissimmee, FL
—
1,578
2,783
—
—
1,578
2,783
4,361
339
1979
12/11
25
La Mirada, CA
—
3,593
911
—
—
3,577
907
4,484
92
1996
12/11
30
Myrtle Beach, SC
—
540
61
—
—
540
61
601
7
1976
12/11
25
Nashville, TN
—
1,155
1,034
5,665
—
3,626
4,235
7,861
309
1985
12/11
(o)
40
Valencia, CA
—
4,788
4,191
—
—
4,766
4,179
8,945
508
1980
12/11
25
Calera, AL
—
1,204
3,075
—
—
1,204
3,075
4,279
245
2008
03/12
35
Jacksonville, FL
—
2,343
2,679
—
—
1,289
2,679
3,968
299
1973
03/12
25
Louisville, TN
—
990
554
1,194
—
990
1,748
2,738
86
1977
03/12
(o)
40
Winter Garden, FL
—
1,173
3,178
—
—
1,173
3,178
4,351
296
1973
03/12
30
Cocoa, FL
—
1,194
1,876
—
—
1,194
1,876
3,070
154
1981
07/12
30
Dover, FL
—
2,431
9,658
—
—
2,431
9,658
12,089
447
2007
01/13
35
Grain Valley, MO
—
1,210
2,908
—
—
1,210
2,908
4,118
107
2003
09/13
(m)
35
Lubbock, TX
—
775
3,998
—
—
775
3,998
4,773
172
1997
09/13
30
Olive Branch, MS
—
3,163
—
3,907
—
3,163
3,907
7,070
(q)
2014
11/13
(m)
(q)
Cedar Falls, IA
—
1,924
3,810
—
—
1,924
3,810
5,734
101
2004
03/14
(m)
30
Carl's Jr.:
Spokane, WA
—
471
530
—
—
471
530
1,001
173
1996
12/01
40
Chandler, AZ
—
729
644
—
—
729
644
1,373
307
1984
06/05
20
Tucson, AZ
—
681
536
103
—
681
639
1,320
609
1988
06/05
10
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-9
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Carmike Cinemas:
Fayetteville, NC
—
2,409
—
13,750
—
2,409
13,750
16,159
43
2014
11/13
40
Montgomery, AL
—
1,686
11,156
—
—
1,686
11,156
12,842
81
2014
09/14
40
Albuquerque, NM
—
1,474
—
—
—
1,474
(e)
1,474
(e)
(e)
11/14
(m)
(e)
CarQuest:
Abbeville, LA
—
23
148
—
—
23
148
171
30
1970
12/10
20
Abbotsford, WI
—
56
163
—
—
56
163
219
26
1984
12/10
25
Aberdeen, SD (n)
—
71
329
—
—
71
329
400
66
1961
12/10
20
Addison, IL
—
76
314
—
—
76
314
390
51
1971
12/10
25
Alsip, IL
—
57
323
—
—
57
323
380
65
1972
12/10
20
Anaconda, MT
—
35
307
—
—
35
307
342
62
1965
12/10
20
Ann Arbor, MI
—
25
241
—
—
25
241
266
49
1970
12/10
20
Antigo, WI
—
96
294
—
—
96
294
390
40
1998
12/10
30
Appleton, WI (n)
—
85
438
—
—
85
438
523
59
1995
12/10
30
Arden, NC
—
42
281
—
—
42
281
323
45
1989
12/10
25
Baker, MT
—
12
140
—
—
12
140
152
28
1965
12/10
20
Bakersfield, CA
—
77
484
—
—
77
484
561
98
1945
12/10
20
Bangor, ME
—
51
339
—
—
51
339
390
55
1985
12/10
25
Bangor, ME (n)
—
53
356
—
—
53
356
409
96
1945
12/10
15
Bartlett, TN
—
40
293
—
—
40
293
333
47
1989
12/10
25
Bay City, MI
—
41
282
—
—
41
282
323
46
1989
12/10
25
Bay City, MI
—
106
521
—
—
106
521
627
140
1920
12/10
15
Bay City, MI
—
14
100
—
—
14
100
114
27
1942
12/10
15
Bellevue, NE
—
29
142
—
—
29
142
171
29
1965
12/10
20
Bend, OR
—
125
245
—
—
125
245
370
66
1935
12/10
15
Biddeford, ME
—
60
320
—
—
60
320
380
65
1968
12/10
20
Billings, MT
—
31
188
—
—
31
188
219
30
1970
12/10
25
Bismarck, ND
—
25
136
—
—
25
136
161
22
1985
12/10
25
Bozeman, MT
—
28
257
—
—
28
257
285
52
1964
12/10
20
Brunswick, ME
—
41
254
—
—
41
254
295
41
1985
12/10
25
Bucksport, ME
—
19
114
—
—
19
114
133
23
1976
12/10
20
Burlington, NC
—
47
229
—
—
47
229
276
31
1994
12/10
30
Carol Stream, IL
—
103
515
—
—
103
515
618
104
1960
12/10
20
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-10
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Chicago, IL
—
83
383
—
—
83
383
466
62
1987
12/10
25
Chippewa Falls, WI
—
33
328
—
—
33
328
361
44
1996
12/10
30
Cody, WY (n)
—
146
253
—
—
96
253
349
34
1999
12/10
30
Colstrip, MT
—
39
275
—
—
39
275
314
44
1981
12/10
25
Connersville, IN
—
28
171
—
—
28
171
199
46
1920
12/10
15
Corapolis, PA (n)
—
74
316
—
—
74
316
390
64
1980
12/10
20
Cut Bank, MT
—
9
115
—
—
9
115
124
23
1937
12/10
20
Devils Lake, ND
—
38
276
—
—
38
276
314
37
1999
12/10
30
Dillon, MT
—
24
204
—
—
24
204
228
41
1973
12/10
20
Dodge City, KS (n)
—
43
166
—
—
43
166
209
45
1948
12/10
15
Eau Claire, WI
—
33
204
—
—
33
204
237
41
1956
12/10
20
Elgin, IL
—
88
311
—
—
88
311
399
63
1965
12/10
20
Enterprise, AL
—
25
184
—
—
25
184
209
30
1988
12/10
25
Escanaba, MI
—
40
283
—
—
40
283
323
46
1982
12/10
25
Evansville, IN
—
60
301
—
—
60
301
361
49
1980
12/10
25
Fairbanks, AK
—
292
545
—
—
292
545
837
63
2003
12/10
35
Gainesville, FL (n)
—
47
362
—
—
47
362
409
97
1957
12/10
15
Glasgow, MT
—
48
275
—
—
48
275
323
56
1972
12/10
20
Great Falls, MT
—
17
173
—
—
17
173
190
35
1967
12/10
20
Greenville, OH
—
63
193
—
—
63
193
256
52
1910
12/10
15
Hamilton, MT
—
24
242
—
—
24
242
266
39
1991
12/10
25
Harlem, MT
—
17
116
—
—
17
116
133
19
1983
12/10
25
Hayward, WI
—
57
333
—
—
57
333
390
54
1980
12/10
25
Helena, MT
—
31
282
—
—
31
282
313
46
1987
12/10
25
Houlton, ME
—
38
219
—
—
38
219
257
89
1915
12/10
10
Irving, TX
—
182
208
—
—
182
208
390
42
1984
12/10
20
Kalispell, MT (n)
—
59
645
—
—
59
645
704
87
1998
12/10
30
Kennedale, TX
—
88
283
—
—
88
283
371
57
1959
12/10
20
Lafayette, LA
—
51
357
—
—
51
357
408
48
1996
12/10
30
Laurel, MS
—
74
202
—
—
74
202
276
54
1959
12/10
15
Lewistown, MT
—
19
180
—
—
19
180
199
29
1964
12/10
25
Livingston, MT
—
34
261
—
—
34
261
295
53
1976
12/10
20
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-11
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Lufkin, TX (n)
—
94
229
—
—
94
229
323
46
1986
12/10
20
Madison, TN
—
78
179
—
—
78
179
257
29
1988
12/10
25
Madison, WI
—
57
409
—
—
57
409
466
66
1973
12/10
25
Malta, MT
—
19
181
—
—
19
181
200
29
1976
12/10
25
Marshfield, WI
—
60
282
—
—
60
282
342
57
1940
12/10
20
Medford, WI
—
37
229
—
—
37
229
266
37
1988
12/10
25
Memphis, TN
—
38
199
—
—
38
199
237
32
1987
12/10
25
Metamora, IL
—
69
292
—
—
69
292
361
39
1996
12/10
30
Midland, MI
—
44
336
—
—
44
336
380
45
1986
12/10
30
Midland, TX
—
36
212
—
—
36
212
248
57
1960
12/10
15
Montello, WI
—
26
173
—
—
26
173
199
23
1997
12/10
30
Muskegon, MI
—
38
257
—
—
38
257
295
35
1990
12/10
30
Neillsville, WI
—
26
145
—
—
26
145
171
23
1979
12/10
25
Nicholasville, KY
—
54
241
—
—
54
241
295
39
1988
12/10
25
Ocala, FL
—
78
416
—
—
78
416
494
112
1971
12/10
15
Olathe, KS
—
78
235
—
—
78
235
313
63
1950
12/10
15
Oshkosh, WI
—
99
224
—
—
99
224
323
30
1999
12/10
30
Overland, MO
—
68
370
—
—
68
370
438
75
1961
12/10
20
Owosso, MI
—
50
264
—
—
50
264
314
43
1986
12/10
25
Pearl, MS
—
43
195
—
—
43
195
238
26
1989
12/10
30
Phillips, WI
—
23
177
—
—
23
177
200
24
1992
12/10
30
Powell, WY
—
37
182
—
—
37
182
219
29
1978
12/10
25
Rhinelander, WI
—
28
115
—
—
28
115
143
23
1958
12/10
20
River Falls, WI
—
42
234
—
—
42
234
276
47
1976
12/10
20
Riverton, WY
—
99
300
—
—
99
300
399
49
1978
12/10
25
Rockford, IL
—
61
376
—
—
61
376
437
61
1962
12/10
25
Roundup, MT
—
23
205
—
—
23
205
228
41
1972
12/10
20
Schofield, WI
—
41
425
—
—
41
425
466
86
1968
12/10
20
Sheboygan, WI
—
77
370
—
—
77
370
447
43
2007
12/10
35
Shelby, MT
—
20
208
—
—
20
208
228
42
1976
12/10
20
Shelbyville, KY
—
52
224
—
—
52
224
276
36
1982
12/10
25
Sidney, MT (n)
—
42
395
—
—
42
395
437
80
1962
12/10
20
Spartanburg, SC
—
53
252
—
—
53
252
305
41
1972
12/10
25
Spokane, WA
—
66
201
—
—
66
201
267
41
1965
12/10
20
Spokane, WA
—
93
373
—
—
93
373
466
75
1972
12/10
20
St. Peter, MN
—
17
259
—
—
17
259
276
35
1999
12/10
30
Stayton, OR
—
88
312
—
—
88
312
400
42
1994
12/10
30
Stevens Point, WI (n)
—
61
405
—
—
61
405
466
65
1975
12/10
25
Sulphur, LA
—
31
216
—
—
31
216
247
44
1984
12/10
20
Thornton, CO
—
414
536
—
—
414
536
950
72
1996
12/10
30
Troy, AL
—
15
52
—
—
15
52
67
14
1966
12/10
15
Wasilla, AK
—
227
504
—
—
227
504
731
58
2002
12/10
35
Wausau, WI
—
52
300
—
—
52
300
352
48
1989
12/10
25
Wautoma, WI
—
18
106
—
—
18
106
124
21
1959
12/10
20
Waynesboro, MS
—
15
71
—
—
15
71
86
19
1962
12/10
15
West Columbia, SC
—
41
159
—
—
41
159
200
32
1962
12/10
20
West Memphis, AR
—
58
294
—
—
58
294
352
48
1987
12/10
25
Whitefish, MT
—
30
227
—
—
30
227
257
31
1993
12/10
30
Williston, ND
—
35
297
—
—
35
297
332
40
1999
12/10
30
Windom, MN
—
5
137
—
—
5
137
142
28
1950
12/10
20
Wisconsin Rapids, WI
—
41
215
—
—
41
215
256
43
1975
12/10
20
Yakima, WA
—
50
321
—
—
50
321
371
65
1965
12/10
20
Aurora, IL
—
641
226
—
—
641
226
867
44
1971
02/11
20
Benton Harbor, MI
—
207
160
—
—
207
160
367
31
1978
02/11
20
Caro, MI
—
85
132
—
—
85
132
217
51
1941
02/11
10
Eagle River, WI
—
99
52
—
—
99
52
151
10
1978
02/11
20
Essexville, MI
—
113
113
—
—
113
113
226
22
1974
02/11
20
Lexington, KY
—
85
226
—
—
85
226
311
29
1991
02/11
30
Mt. Pleasant, MI
—
85
207
—
—
85
207
292
32
1984
02/11
25
Portland, ME
—
123
264
—
—
123
264
387
68
1951
02/11
15
Saginaw, MI
—
179
75
—
—
179
75
254
29
1955
02/11
10
Warrenton, VA
—
123
66
—
—
123
66
189
26
1939
02/11
10
Billings, MT
—
66
291
—
—
66
291
357
40
1994
07/11
25
Mobile, AL
—
75
197
—
—
75
197
272
34
1975
07/11
20
New Castle, IN
—
113
19
—
—
113
19
132
3
1991
07/11
25
Spokane, WA
—
75
56
—
—
75
56
131
10
1955
07/11
20
Chicago, IL
—
90
239
—
—
90
239
329
50
1949
11/11
15
Missoula, MT
—
99
367
—
—
99
367
466
57
1965
11/11
20
Sheridan, WY
—
198
385
—
—
198
385
583
60
1980
11/11
20
Sauk Centre, MN
—
64
85
—
—
64
85
149
11
1958
11/11
25
Watford City, ND
—
31
124
—
—
31
124
155
15
1974
11/11
25
Fairmont, MN
—
98
166
—
—
98
166
264
25
1978
01/12
20
Sycamore, IL
—
49
476
—
—
49
476
525
70
1924
01/12
20
Worland, WY
—
48
193
—
—
48
193
241
26
1949
04/12
20
Anchorage, AK
—
315
92
—
—
315
92
407
12
1971
06/12
20
Havre, MT
—
29
305
—
—
29
305
334
39
1964
06/12
20
Orchard Park, NY
—
353
—
725
—
267
725
992
22
2013
05/13
(m)
40
Morrisville, NC
—
127
332
—
—
127
332
459
22
1992
05/13
25
Salt Lake City, UT
—
571
697
—
—
571
697
1,268
57
1951
05/13
20
San Antonio, TX
—
137
361
—
—
137
361
498
29
1980
05/13
20
San Antonio, TX
—
87
719
—
—
87
719
806
47
1973
05/13
25
Jackson, MS
—
253
—
595
—
253
595
848
(q)
2013
06/13
(m)
(q)
Crestview, FL
—
158
463
—
—
158
463
621
20
2003
09/13
30
Depew, NY
—
309
—
846
—
309
846
1,155
(q)
2014
10/13
(m)
(q)
Sherman, TX
—
183
—
657
—
183
657
840
12
2005
01/14
(m)
35
Carrabba's:
Canton, MI
—
685
1,687
—
—
685
1,687
2,372
157
2002
03/12
30
Cape Coral, FL
—
645
2,965
—
—
645
2,965
3,610
237
2005
03/12
35
Dallas, TX
—
672
1,078
—
—
672
1,078
1,750
100
2000
03/12
30
Gainesville, FL
—
922
1,944
—
—
922
1,944
2,866
181
2001
03/12
30
Jacksonville, FL
—
1,140
1,428
—
—
1,140
1,428
2,568
133
2001
03/12
30
Mason, OH
—
653
2,267
—
—
653
2,267
2,920
211
2000
03/12
30
Maumee, OH
—
525
2,684
—
—
525
2,684
3,209
250
2002
03/12
30
Mobile, AL
—
633
1,909
—
—
633
1,909
2,542
178
2001
03/12
30
Pensacola, FL
—
734
1,854
—
—
734
1,854
2,588
148
2003
03/12
35
Waldorf, MD
—
1,473
2,199
—
—
1,473
2,199
3,672
175
2007
03/12
35
Carvers:
Centerville, OH
—
851
1,059
—
—
851
1,059
1,910
345
1986
12/01
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-12
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Certified Auto Sales:
Albuquerque, NM
—
1,113
—
1,443
—
1,113
1,443
2,556
338
2005
04/04
(f)
40
Chair King:
Grapevine, TX
—
1,018
2,067
273
—
1,018
2,340
3,358
873
1998
06/98
40
Champps:
Irving, TX
—
1,760
1,724
—
—
1,760
1,724
3,484
562
2000
12/01
40
Cheddar's Cafe:
Baytown, TX
—
858
2,251
—
—
858
2,251
3,109
227
2010
12/10
40
West Monroe, LA
—
907
2,301
—
—
907
2,301
3,208
228
2010
01/11
40
Selma, TX
—
1,446
—
2,439
—
1,446
2,439
3,885
201
2011
03/11
(m)
40
Jonesboro, AR
—
1,206
—
2,459
—
1,206
2,459
3,665
192
2011
05/11
(m)
40
Hattiesburg, MS
—
1,203
—
—
—
1,196
(i)
1,196
(i)
(i)
11/11
(m)
(i)
Pleasant Prairie, WI
—
1,310
—
2,779
—
1,310
2,779
4,089
84
2013
04/13
(m)
40
Liberty, MO
—
1,313
—
3,140
—
1,313
3,140
4,453
75
2014
07/13
(m)
40
Chick-Fil-A:
Ankeny, IA
—
662
—
—
—
662
(i)
662
(i)
(i)
06/05
(i)
Chili's:
Camden, SC
—
627
1,888
—
—
627
1,888
2,515
439
2005
09/05
40
Milledgeville, GA
—
516
1,997
—
—
516
1,997
2,513
464
2005
09/05
40
Sumter, SC
—
800
1,717
—
—
800
1,717
2,517
388
2004
12/05
40
Hinesville, GA
—
921
1,898
—
—
921
1,898
2,819
374
2006
02/07
40
Albany, GA
—
615
—
1,984
—
615
1,984
2,599
358
2007
06/07
(m)
40
Statesboro, GA
—
703
—
1,888
—
703
1,888
2,591
336
2007
06/07
(m)
40
Florence, SC
—
889
1,715
—
—
889
1,715
2,604
323
2007
06/07
40
Valdosta, GA
—
716
—
1,871
—
716
1,871
2,587
329
2007
07/07
(m)
40
Tifton, GA
—
454
1,550
—
—
454
1,550
2,004
241
2008
06/08
40
Evans, GA
—
700
—
1,511
—
685
1,511
2,196
222
2009
10/08
(m)
40
Jefferson City, MO
—
305
898
—
—
305
898
1,203
129
2003
12/09
35
Merriam, KS
—
853
981
—
—
853
981
1,834
165
1998
12/09
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-13
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Wichita, KS
—
420
623
—
—
420
623
1,043
105
1995
12/09
30
Hutchinson, KS
—
456
1,794
—
—
456
1,794
2,250
112
2004
02/13
30
Lexington, SC
—
630
1,620
—
—
630
1,620
2,250
87
2008
02/13
35
China 1:
Cohoes, NY
—
16
87
6
—
16
93
109
25
1994
09/04
40
China Wok:
Carlisle, PA
—
90
107
—
—
90
107
197
22
1988
01/06
40
Chipotle:
Florissant, MO
—
50
59
170
—
50
228
278
28
2013
04/03
(g)
40
Chuck E. Cheese's:
Mobile, AL
—
340
951
—
—
340
951
1,291
149
1981
11/11
20
Antioch, TN
—
459
1,738
—
—
459
1,738
2,197
53
1982
07/14
15
Huntsville, AL
—
382
1,182
—
—
382
1,182
1,564
27
1960
07/14
20
Saginaw, MI
—
489
1,203
—
—
489
1,203
1,692
28
1981
07/14
20
Albuquerque, NM
—
794
2,126
—
—
794
2,126
2,920
23
2003
08/14
35
Alexandria, LA
—
872
3,291
—
—
872
3,291
4,163
49
1983
08/14
25
Alpharetta, GA
—
2,027
1,743
—
—
2,027
1,743
3,770
22
2001
08/14
30
Atlanta, GA
—
1,313
1,656
—
—
1,313
1,656
2,969
25
1982
08/14
25
Austin, TX
—
852
4,024
—
—
852
4,024
4,876
50
2001
08/14
30
Batavia, IL
—
1,214
2,664
—
—
1,214
2,664
3,878
33
1999
08/14
30
Birmingham, AL
—
627
3,662
—
—
627
3,662
4,289
55
1982
08/14
25
Columbia, SC
—
509
2,655
—
—
509
2,655
3,164
33
1983
08/14
30
Conroe, TX
—
793
3,388
—
—
793
3,388
4,181
42
2001
08/14
30
Cordova, TN
—
1,195
3,055
—
—
1,195
3,055
4,250
38
2002
08/14
30
Denton, TX
—
833
1,245
—
—
833
1,245
2,078
13
2003
08/14
35
El Centro, CA
—
470
2,811
—
—
470
2,811
3,281
30
2005
08/14
35
Englewood, CO
—
911
3,056
—
—
911
3,056
3,967
38
1970
08/14
30
Foothill Ranch, CA
—
1,088
1,391
—
—
1,088
1,391
2,479
17
2003
08/14
30
Ft. Wayne, IN
—
686
3,232
—
—
686
3,232
3,918
40
1985
08/14
30
Garland, TX
—
1,224
2,302
—
—
1,224
2,302
3,526
25
2006
08/14
35
Grand Prairie, TX
—
1,380
4,983
—
—
1,380
4,983
6,363
62
2001
08/14
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-14
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Grapevine, TX
—
1,303
2,135
—
—
1,303
2,135
3,438
27
2002
08/14
30
Greenville, SC
—
764
3,554
—
—
764
3,554
4,318
53
1983
08/14
25
Hickory, NC
—
647
1,686
—
—
647
1,686
2,333
18
2002
08/14
35
Horn Lake, MS
—
960
3,388
—
—
960
3,388
4,348
36
2002
08/14
35
Jacksonville, FL
—
1,038
4,220
—
—
1,038
4,220
5,258
63
1981
08/14
25
Katy, TX
—
960
4,171
—
—
960
4,171
5,131
52
2002
08/14
30
Kennesaw, GA
—
1,332
3,818
—
—
1,332
3,818
5,150
48
1999
08/14
30
Killeen, TX
—
832
4,876
—
—
832
4,876
5,708
52
2004
08/14
35
Lake Charles, LA
—
853
1,539
—
—
853
1,539
2,392
19
2001
08/14
30
Littleton, CO
—
1,234
4,288
—
—
1,234
4,288
5,522
54
1994
08/14
30
Longview, TX
—
314
1,931
—
—
314
1,931
2,245
21
2004
08/14
35
Madison, WI
—
999
1,989
—
—
999
1,989
2,988
30
1982
08/14
25
Miamisburg, OH
—
607
4,416
—
—
607
4,416
5,023
66
1986
08/14
25
Midland, TX
—
588
2,537
—
—
588
2,537
3,125
32
2000
08/14
30
N. Richland Hills, TX
—
588
4,064
—
—
588
4,064
4,652
61
1982
08/14
25
Norcross, GA
—
1,077
2,703
—
—
1,077
2,703
3,780
41
1982
08/14
25
North Charleston, SC
—
1,449
3,319
—
—
1,449
3,319
4,768
41
2003
08/14
30
Oklahoma City, OK
—
499
3,203
—
—
499
3,203
3,702
48
1982
08/14
25
Olathe, KS
—
843
736
—
—
843
736
1,579
9
2002
08/14
30
Racine, WI
—
765
834
—
—
765
834
1,599
10
2000
08/14
30
Roanoke, TX
—
617
4,787
—
—
617
4,787
5,404
72
1983
08/14
25
San Antonio, TX
—
1,371
2,703
—
—
1,371
2,703
4,074
34
2001
08/14
30
San Antonio, TX
—
793
4,670
—
—
793
4,670
5,463
70
1990
08/14
25
Savannah, GA
—
1,469
2,634
—
—
1,469
2,634
4,103
40
1982
08/14
25
Sharonville, OH
—
696
1,597
—
—
696
1,597
2,293
24
1982
08/14
25
Sterling Heights, MI
—
725
2,322
—
—
725
2,322
3,047
29
1994
08/14
30
Sugarland, TX
—
1,107
3,134
—
—
1,107
3,134
4,241
39
2002
08/14
30
Topeka, KS
—
373
619
—
—
373
619
992
8
1990
08/14
30
Virginia Beach, VA
—
1,018
3,848
—
—
1,018
3,848
4,866
58
1984
08/14
25
Wichita Falls, TX
—
323
3,105
—
—
323
3,105
3,428
47
1982
08/14
25
Wichita, KS
—
862
2,850
—
—
862
2,850
3,712
36
1991
08/14
30
Yuma, AZ
—
471
668
—
—
471
668
1,139
7
2004
08/14
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-15
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Chuy's:
Cincinnati, OH
—
1,165
1,322
—
—
1,165
1,322
2,487
61
1996
05/13
30
Cinemark:
Draper, UT
—
1,523
—
4,487
—
1,523
4,487
6,010
407
2011
08/10
(m)
40
Fort Worth, TX
—
2,140
—
7,660
—
2,140
7,660
9,800
487
2012
08/11
(m)
40
Cincinnati, OH
—
1,334
—
10,206
—
1,334
10,206
11,540
351
2013
09/12
(m)
40
McCandless, PA
—
3,094
—
6,389
—
3,094
6,389
9,483
47
2014
09/13
(m)
40
Marina, CA
—
15
—
—
—
15
(e)
15
(e)
(e)
08/14
(m)
(e)
Claim Jumper:
Roseville, CA
—
1,557
2,014
—
—
1,557
2,014
3,571
657
2000
12/01
40
Tempe, AZ
—
2,531
2,921
—
—
2,531
2,921
5,452
952
2000
12/01
40
Clairton Mini Mart:
Clairton, PA
—
215
701
—
—
215
701
916
251
1986
01/06
25
Continental Rental:
Lapeer, MI
—
88
633
—
—
88
603
691
115
2007
10/05
40
Cool Crest:
Independence, MO
—
1,838
1,534
75
—
1,838
1,609
3,447
297
1988
05/07
40
CORA Rehabilitation Clinics:
Orlando, FL
38
(h)
80
221
—
—
80
221
301
60
2001
02/04
40
CTD Outdoor Adventures:
Fort Worth, TX
—
1,652
2,018
—
—
1,652
2,018
3,670
498
2000
02/05
40
CVS:
Lafayette, LA
—
968
—
—
—
968
(c)
968
(c)
1995
01/96
(c)
Fort Lauderdale, FL
—
3,165
3,319
190
—
3,165
3,509
6,674
1,275
1995
02/96
33
Midwest City, OK
—
673
1,103
—
—
673
1,103
1,776
519
1996
03/96
40
Pantego, TX
—
1,016
1,449
—
—
1,016
1,449
2,465
635
1997
06/97
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-16
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Arlington, TX
—
2,079
—
1,397
—
2,079
1,397
3,476
572
1998
11/97
(g)
40
Leavenworth, KS
—
726
—
1,331
—
726
1,331
2,057
550
1998
11/97
(g)
40
Lewisville, TX
—
789
—
1,335
—
789
1,335
2,124
544
1998
04/98
(g)
40
Forest Hill, TX
—
692
—
1,175
—
692
1,175
1,867
481
1998
04/98
(g)
40
Garland, TX
—
1,477
—
1,400
—
1,477
1,400
2,877
564
1998
06/98
(g)
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
1,581
—
1,471
—
1,581
1,471
3,052
587
1999
08/98
(g)
40
Dallas, TX
—
2,618
—
2,571
—
2,618
2,571
5,189
720
2003
06/99
(g)
40
Gladstone, MO
—
1,851
—
1,740
—
1,851
1,740
3,591
625
2000
12/99
(g)
40
Dave & Buster's:
Hilliard, OH
—
934
4,689
—
—
934
4,689
5,623
952
1998
11/06
40
Tulsa, OK
—
1,862
—
2,105
—
1,862
2,105
3,967
314
2009
04/08
(m)
40
Wauwatosa, WI
—
5,694
—
5,638
—
5,694
5,638
11,332
675
2010
12/08
(m)
40
Orlando, FL
—
8,114
—
4,224
—
8,114
4,224
12,338
365
2011
06/10
(m)
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
3,156
—
4,870
—
3,156
4,870
8,026
360
2012
02/11
(m)
40
Dallas, TX
—
5,052
—
8,808
—
5,052
8,808
13,860
450
2012
03/12
(m)
40
Livonia, MI
—
2,116
—
7,758
—
2,116
7,758
9,874
202
2013
04/13
(m)
40
Euless, TX
—
2,592
—
—
—
2,592
(e)
2,592
(e)
(e)
08/14
(m)
(e)
DaVita Dialysis:
Columbus, OH
—
527
1,426
—
—
527
1,426
1,953
22
2000
07/14
30
Del Frisco's:
Fort Worth, TX
—
351
5,874
—
—
351
5,874
6,225
1,163
1890
01/11
20
Greenwood Village, CO
—
1,863
5,649
—
—
1,863
5,649
7,512
1,118
1979
01/11
20
Denny's:
Clifton, CO
—
245
732
375
—
245
1,107
1,352
279
1998
12/01
40
Columbus, TX
—
428
817
—
—
428
817
1,245
266
1997
12/01
40
Alexandria, VA
—
604
196
—
—
604
196
800
81
1981
09/06
20
Amarillo, TX
—
590
632
—
—
590
632
1,222
262
1982
09/06
20
Arlington Heights, IL
—
470
228
—
—
470
228
698
94
1977
09/06
20
Austintown, OH
—
466
397
—
—
466
397
863
165
1980
09/06
20
Boardman Township, OH
—
497
258
—
—
497
258
755
107
1977
09/06
20
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-17
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Campbell, CA
—
460
238
—
—
460
238
698
99
1976
09/06
20
Carson, CA
—
1,246
157
—
—
1,246
157
1,403
65
1975
09/06
20
Chehalis, WA
—
415
287
—
—
415
287
702
119
1977
09/06
20
Chubbuck, ID
—
350
394
—
—
344
394
738
163
1983
09/06
20
Clackamas, OR
—
468
407
—
—
468
407
875
169
1993
09/06
20
Collinsville, IL
—
676
283
—
—
676
283
959
117
1979
09/06
20
Colorado Springs, CO
—
321
377
—
—
321
377
698
156
1984
09/06
20
Colorado Springs, CO
—
585
390
—
—
585
390
975
162
1978
09/06
20
Corpus Christi, TX
—
345
776
300
—
345
1,076
1,421
417
1980
09/06
20
Dallas, TX
—
497
150
—
—
497
150
647
62
1979
09/06
20
Enfield, CT
—
684
229
—
—
684
229
913
95
1976
09/06
20
Fairfax, VA
—
768
683
—
—
768
683
1,451
283
1979
09/06
20
Federal Way, WA
—
543
193
—
—
543
193
736
80
1977
09/06
20
Florissant, MO
—
443
238
—
—
443
238
681
99
1977
09/06
20
Fort Worth, TX
—
392
314
—
—
392
314
706
130
1974
09/06
20
Hermitage, PA
—
321
420
—
—
321
420
741
174
1980
09/06
20
Hialeah, FL
—
432
175
—
—
432
175
607
73
1978
09/06
20
Houston, TX
—
504
348
—
—
504
348
852
144
1976
09/06
20
Indianapolis, IN
—
231
511
—
—
231
511
742
212
1974
09/06
20
Indianapolis, IN
—
326
511
—
—
326
511
837
212
1978
09/06
20
Indianapolis, IN
—
310
590
—
—
310
590
900
244
1981
09/06
20
Indianapolis, IN
—
358
767
—
—
358
767
1,125
318
1978
09/06
20
Kernersville, NC
—
407
557
—
—
407
557
964
231
2000
09/06
20
Lafayette, IN
—
424
773
—
—
416
773
1,189
321
1978
09/06
20
Laurel, MD
—
528
379
—
—
528
379
907
157
1976
09/06
20
Little Rock, AR
—
703
180
—
—
703
180
883
75
1979
09/06
20
Maplewood, MN
—
630
271
—
—
630
271
901
112
1983
09/06
20
Merriville, IN
—
368
813
—
—
368
813
1,181
337
1976
09/06
20
N. Miami, FL
—
855
151
—
—
855
151
1,006
63
1977
09/06
20
Nampa, ID
—
357
729
—
—
357
729
1,086
302
1979
09/06
20
North Richland Hills, TX
—
500
130
—
—
500
130
630
54
1970
09/06
20
Omaha, NE
—
496
314
—
—
496
314
810
130
1994
09/06
20
Pompano Beach, FL
—
436
394
—
—
436
394
830
163
1976
09/06
20
Portland, OR
—
764
161
—
—
764
161
925
67
1977
09/06
20
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-18
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Provo, UT
—
519
216
—
—
519
216
735
90
1978
09/06
20
Pueblo, CO
—
475
302
—
—
475
302
777
125
1980
09/06
20
Raleigh, NC
—
1,094
482
—
—
1,094
482
1,576
200
1984
09/06
20
St. Louis, MO
—
520
266
—
—
520
266
786
110
1973
09/06
20
Sugarland, TX
—
315
334
—
—
315
334
649
138
1997
09/06
20
Tacoma, WA
—
580
201
—
—
575
201
776
83
1984
09/06
20
Tucson, AZ
—
922
290
—
—
922
290
1,212
120
1979
09/06
20
Wethersfield, CT
—
884
176
—
—
884
176
1,060
73
1978
09/06
20
Worcester, MA
—
383
493
—
—
383
493
876
204
1978
09/06
20
Boise, ID
—
514
477
—
—
514
477
991
192
1983
12/06
20
St. Louis, MO
—
635
303
—
—
635
303
938
121
1980
01/07
20
Virginia Gardens, FL
—
793
133
—
—
793
133
926
53
1977
01/07
20
Akron, OH
—
308
1,062
—
—
308
1,062
1,370
55
1992
06/13
30
Diamond Communication:
Lapeer, MI
—
37
264
—
—
37
251
288
48
2007
10/05
40
Dickey's Barbeque Pit:
Medina, OH
—
405
464
104
—
405
568
973
161
1996
12/01
40
Dick's Sporting Goods:
Taylor, MI
—
1,920
3,527
—
—
1,920
3,527
5,447
1,613
1996
08/96
40
White Marsh, MD
—
2,681
3,917
—
—
2,681
3,917
6,598
1,792
1996
08/96
40
Dollar General:
San Antonio, TX
—
441
784
—
—
441
196
637
7
1993
12/93
30
Memphis, TN
—
266
1,136
46
—
266
1,182
1,448
449
1998
12/97
40
High Springs, FL
—
409
—
1,072
—
432
1,072
1,504
111
2010
07/10
(m)
40
Inverness, FL
—
459
—
1,046
—
471
1,046
1,517
104
2011
08/10
(m)
40
Cocoa, FL
—
385
—
935
—
406
935
1,341
96
2010
08/10
(m)
40
Palm Bay, FL
—
355
—
1,011
—
365
1,011
1,376
102
2010
08/10
(m)
40
Deland, FL
—
585
—
958
—
585
958
1,543
93
2010
11/10
(m)
40
Seffner, FL
—
673
—
1,223
—
655
1,223
1,878
118
2011
12/10
(m)
40
Hernando, FL
—
372
—
970
—
372
970
1,342
90
2011
01/11
(m)
40
Titusville, FL
—
512
—
1,002
—
512
1,002
1,514
85
2011
04/11
(m)
40
Bunnlevel, NC
—
106
—
737
—
106
737
843
59
2011
08/11
(m)
40
Disputanta, VA
—
170
—
720
—
170
720
890
59
2011
09/11
(m)
40
Lumberton, NC
—
115
—
902
—
115
902
1,017
67
2012
10/11
(m)
40
Newport News, VA
—
363
—
967
—
363
967
1,330
76
2011
10/11
(m)
40
Cumberland, VA
—
317
—
1,147
—
317
1,147
1,464
80
2012
12/11
(m)
40
Aberdeen, NC
—
156
—
821
—
156
821
977
56
2012
01/12
(m)
40
Richmond, VA
—
144
—
863
—
144
863
1,007
53
2012
02/12
(m)
40
Danville, VA
—
155
—
864
—
155
864
1,019
57
2012
03/12
(m)
40
Cascade, VA
—
139
—
806
—
139
806
945
51
2012
03/12
(m)
40
Sanford, NC
—
147
—
834
—
147
834
981
50
2012
04/12
(m)
40
Leland, NC
—
245
—
892
—
245
892
1,137
49
2012
06/12
(m)
40
Sanford, NC
—
206
—
829
—
206
829
1,035
46
2012
07/12
(m)
40
Richmond, VA
—
305
—
902
—
305
902
1,207
48
2012
08/12
(m)
40
Stead, NV
—
234
—
1,464
—
234
1,464
1,698
75
2012
08/12
(m)
40
Martinsville, VA
—
165
—
831
—
165
831
996
42
2012
09/12
(m)
40
Yerington, NV
—
313
—
1,170
—
313
1,170
1,483
57
2013
09/12
(m)
40
Ridgeway, VA
—
271
—
935
—
271
935
1,206
42
2013
11/12
(m)
40
Hawthorne, NV
—
210
1,069
—
—
210
1,069
1,279
55
2012
12/12
40
Sun Valley, NV
—
439
—
1,438
—
439
1,438
1,877
58
2013
01/13
(m)
40
Norfolk, VA
—
455
—
929
—
455
929
1,384
36
2013
03/13
(m)
40
Suffolk, VA
—
186
—
958
—
186
958
1,144
37
2013
03/13
(m)
40
Suffolk, VA
—
128
—
1,010
—
128
1,010
1,138
35
2013
04/13
(m)
40
Irving, NY
—
210
—
961
—
210
961
1,171
29
2013
06/13
(m)
40
Oakfield, NY
—
257
—
1,108
—
271
1,108
1,379
20
2014
10/13
(m)
40
Holland, NY
—
176
—
1,103
—
176
1,103
1,279
13
2014
12/13
(m)
40
Jeffersonville, IN
—
115
960
—
—
115
960
1,075
24
2010
02/14
35
LaFayette, LA
—
157
378
—
—
157
378
535
7
2002
07/14
25
Youngsville, LA
—
98
370
—
—
98
370
468
7
2002
07/14
25
Dollar Tree:
Garland, TX
—
239
626
—
—
239
626
865
211
1994
02/94
40
Copperas Cove, TX
—
242
512
194
—
242
706
948
272
1972
11/98
40
Marietta, GA
—
525
—
—
—
525
(e)
525
(e)
(e)
12/14
(m)
(e)
Don Tello's Tex-Mex Grill:
Lithonia, GA
—
923
1,276
16
—
923
1,293
2,216
241
2002
06/07
40
Dr. Clean Dry Cleaners:
Monticello, NY
—
20
72
—
—
20
72
92
18
1996
03/05
40
Eagle Tax Center:
Hollywood, FL
—
203
46
19
—
124
—
124
—
1960
12/05
15
Ecotech Institute:
Aurora, CO
—
5,076
13,874
5,663
—
5,041
19,537
24,578
3,292
1986
04/07
40
Austin, TX
—
2,291
1,770
4,999
—
2,291
6,769
9,060
460
1996
12/11
35
Empire Buffet:
Las Cruces, NM
—
947
—
2,286
—
947
2,286
3,233
461
2006
01/06
(m)
40
Encore at Crosswoods:
Columbus, OH
—
1,032
1,107
—
—
1,032
1,107
2,139
361
1998
12/01
40
Express Mart:
Thomasville, NC
—
140
228
—
—
140
228
368
5
1962
07/14
20
Express Oil Change:
Birmingham, AL
—
470
695
—
—
470
695
1,165
118
2008
02/08
(f)
40
Florence, AL
—
110
381
—
—
110
381
491
87
1987
02/08
30
Helena, AL
—
363
628
—
—
363
628
991
108
1998
02/08
40
Muscle Shoals, AL
—
168
624
—
—
168
624
792
143
1985
02/08
30
Opelika, AL
—
547
680
—
—
547
680
1,227
117
2006
02/08
40
Cordova, TN
—
639
785
—
—
639
785
1,424
119
2000
12/08
40
Horn Lake, MS
—
326
611
—
—
326
611
937
105
1998
12/08
35
Lakeland, TN
—
186
489
—
—
186
489
675
74
2000
12/08
40
Memphis, TN
—
402
721
—
—
402
721
1,123
109
2001
12/08
40
Houston, TX
—
651
—
648
—
543
648
1,191
40
2012
02/12
(m)
40
Katy, TX
—
539
—
830
—
539
829
1,368
42
2012
07/12
(m)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-19
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Chattanooga, TN
—
224
173
—
—
224
173
397
13
2001
10/12
30
Chattanooga, TN
—
239
1,214
—
—
239
1,214
1,453
89
1998
10/12
30
Chattanooga, TN
—
238
1,756
—
—
238
1,756
1,994
129
1998
10/12
30
Cleveland, TN
—
318
1,064
—
—
318
1,064
1,382
67
2004
10/12
35
Fort Oglethorpe, GA
—
241
331
—
—
241
331
572
21
2003
10/12
35
Marietta, GA
—
618
30
—
—
618
30
648
2
1988
12/12
30
Smyrna, GA
—
295
1,092
—
—
295
1,092
1,387
89
1984
12/12
25
Missouri City, TX
—
606
—
860
—
606
860
1,466
12
2014
01/14
(m)
40
Houston, TX
—
550
—
—
—
550
(e)
550
(e)
(e)
05/14
(m)
(e)
Fallas Paredes:
Arlington, TX
—
318
1,680
242
—
318
1,923
2,241
1,302
1996
06/96
38
Family Dollar:
Albany, NY
—
34
824
—
—
34
824
858
212
1992
09/04
40
Cohoes, NY
—
140
753
49
—
140
802
942
219
1994
09/04
40
Hudson Falls, NY
—
51
380
625
—
187
869
1,056
112
1993
09/04
40
Monticello, NY
—
96
352
—
—
96
352
448
86
1996
03/05
40
Richmond, TX
—
366
1,059
—
—
366
1,059
1,425
26
2012
02/14
35
Spring, TX
—
199
1,152
—
—
199
1,152
1,351
29
2012
02/14
35
Bartlesville, OK
—
110
445
—
—
110
445
555
8
2001
07/14
25
Huntsville, AL
—
141
596
—
—
141
596
737
9
2005
07/14
30
Tulsa, OK
—
70
519
—
—
70
519
589
10
2001
07/14
25
Famous Footwear:
Lapeer, MI
—
163
835
—
—
163
812
975
150
2007
10/05
40
Fantastic Sams:
Eden Prairie, MN
—
65
181
81
—
65
261
326
83
1997
12/01
40
Ferguson:
Destin, FL
—
554
1,012
253
—
554
1,265
1,819
238
2006
03/07
40
Union City, GA
—
144
1,260
—
—
144
1,260
1,404
131
2010
05/11
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-20
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Fikes Wholesale:
Belton, TX
—
722
1,814
—
—
722
1,814
2,536
175
2007
08/11
35
Godley, TX
—
1,453
2,084
—
—
1,453
2,084
3,537
201
2008
08/11
35
Killeen, TX
—
1,302
2,514
—
—
1,302
2,514
3,816
242
2008
08/11
35
Killeen, TX
—
1,053
833
—
—
1,053
833
1,886
80
2007
08/11
35
McGregor, TX
—
511
1,484
—
—
511
1,484
1,995
143
2006
08/11
35
Thorndale, TX
—
331
984
—
—
331
984
1,315
95
2007
08/11
35
Valley Mills, TX
—
711
2,114
—
—
711
2,114
2,825
204
2006
08/11
35
West, TX
—
402
864
—
—
402
864
1,266
97
1999
08/11
30
Gladewater, TX
—
145
2,107
—
—
145
2,107
2,252
18
2007
09/14
35
Hearne, TX
—
68
2,184
—
—
68
2,184
2,252
21
1996
09/14
30
Jarrell, TX
—
541
2,965
—
—
541
2,965
3,506
25
2009
09/14
35
Killeen, TX
—
628
2,878
—
—
628
2,878
3,506
24
2013
09/14
35
Liberty Hill, TX
—
203
3,303
—
—
203
3,303
3,506
28
2013
09/14
35
Rosebud, TX
—
58
1,847
—
—
58
1,847
1,905
15
2012
09/14
35
Temple, TX (n)
—
1,052
3,302
—
—
1,052
3,302
4,354
28
2012
09/14
35
Waco, TX
—
1,400
2,106
—
—
1,400
2,106
3,506
20
1997
09/14
30
First Cash Pawn:
Alice, TX
—
318
578
—
—
318
578
896
189
1995
12/01
40
Five Below:
Florissant, MO
—
249
294
849
—
250
1,142
1,392
141
1996
04/03
(g)
40
Five Guys Burgers and Fries:
Middleburg Heights, OH
—
497
260
250
—
497
510
1,007
137
1976
09/06
20
Flash Markets:
Lebanon, TN
—
582
—
2,063
—
582
2,063
2,645
355
2007
03/07
(m)
40
Fleming's:
Akron, OH
—
475
3,140
—
—
475
3,140
3,615
250
2005
03/12
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-21
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Food 4 Less:
Chula Vista, CA
—
3,569
—
—
—
3,569
(c)
3,569
(c)
1995
11/98
(c)
Food Fast:
Bossier City, LA
—
883
658
—
—
883
658
1,541
331
1975
06/07
15
Brownsboro, TX
—
328
385
—
—
328
385
713
97
1990
06/07
30
Flint, TX
—
272
411
—
—
272
411
683
124
1985
06/07
25
Forney, TX
—
545
707
—
—
545
707
1,252
178
1989
06/07
30
Forney, TX
—
473
654
—
—
473
654
1,127
164
1990
06/07
30
Gun Barrel City, TX
—
242
467
—
—
242
467
709
141
1988
06/07
25
Gun Barrel City, TX
—
270
386
—
—
270
386
656
117
1986
06/07
25
Jacksonville, TX
—
660
632
—
—
660
632
1,292
318
1976
06/07
15
Kemp, TX
—
581
505
—
—
581
505
1,086
152
1986
06/07
25
Longview, TX
—
252
304
—
—
252
304
556
92
1983
06/07
25
Longview, TX
—
403
572
—
—
403
572
975
173
1985
06/07
25
Longview, TX
—
271
431
—
—
271
431
702
108
1990
06/07
30
Longview, TX
—
426
382
—
—
426
382
808
115
1984
06/07
25
Longview, TX
—
360
535
—
—
360
535
895
161
1983
06/07
25
Mabank, TX
—
229
494
—
—
229
494
723
149
1986
06/07
25
Mt. Vernon, TX
—
292
666
2,800
—
292
2,800
3,092
120
2013
06/07
(m)
40
Tyler, TX
—
542
403
—
—
481
403
884
122
1984
06/07
25
Tyler, TX
—
316
545
—
—
316
545
861
137
1989
06/07
30
Tyler, TX
—
323
283
—
—
323
283
606
107
1978
06/07
20
Tyler, TX
—
488
831
—
—
488
831
1,319
313
1980
06/07
20
Tyler, TX
—
188
329
—
—
188
329
517
99
1984
06/07
25
Tyler, TX
—
742
546
—
—
742
546
1,288
165
1985
06/07
25
Fort Ticonderoga:
Ticonderoga, NY
—
89
689
60
—
89
749
838
183
1993
09/04
40
Fresenius Medical Care:
Houston, TX
—
422
1,915
518
—
422
2,434
2,856
500
1995
08/06
40
Rockford, MI
—
226
1,404
—
—
226
1,404
1,630
21
2002
07/14
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-22
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Fresh Market:
Gainesville, FL
—
317
1,248
656
—
317
1,904
2,221
478
1982
03/99
40
Fuel Up:
Chambersburg, PA
—
76
197
—
—
76
197
273
92
1990
08/05
20
Fuel-On:
Bloomsburg, PA
—
541
146
—
—
541
146
687
68
1967
08/05
20
Dallas, PA
—
677
1,091
—
—
677
1,091
1,768
511
1995
08/05
20
Emporium, PA
—
380
569
—
—
380
569
949
267
1996
08/05
20
Hazleton, PA
—
2,529
728
—
—
2,529
728
3,257
341
2001
08/05
20
Johnsonburg, PA
—
781
504
—
—
781
504
1,285
236
1978
08/05
20
Kane, PA
—
478
592
—
—
356
—
356
—
1984
08/05
20
Luzerne, PA
—
171
415
—
—
171
415
586
195
1989
08/05
20
Ridgway, PA
—
382
259
—
—
382
259
641
121
1975
08/05
20
St. Mary's, PA
—
274
261
—
—
274
261
535
122
1979
08/05
20
White Haven, PA (n)
—
486
867
—
—
486
867
1,353
406
1990
08/05
20
Carlisle, PA
—
170
202
—
—
170
202
372
48
1988
01/06
40
Danville, PA
—
180
359
—
—
180
359
539
80
1988
01/06
40
Houtzdale, PA
—
541
500
—
—
356
—
356
—
1977
01/06
15
Minersville, PA
—
680
582
—
—
680
582
1,262
130
1974
01/06
40
Pittsburgh, PA
—
905
1,346
—
—
905
1,346
2,251
301
1967
01/06
40
Zelienople, PA
—
160
437
—
—
160
437
597
98
1988
01/06
40
Furr's Family Dining:
Moore, OK
—
939
—
2,429
—
939
2,429
3,368
438
2007
03/07
(m)
40
Arlington, TX
—
1,061
—
1,594
—
1,061
1,594
2,655
168
2010
04/10
(m)
40
McAllen, TX
—
520
1,700
—
—
520
1,700
2,220
172
2004
12/11
30
Gander Mountain:
Florence, AL
—
1,034
—
4,315
—
851
4,315
5,166
247
2012
06/04
(m)
40
Amarillo, TX
—
1,514
5,781
—
—
1,514
5,781
7,295
1,463
2004
11/04
40
DeForest, WI
—
2,798
10,953
2,500
—
2,787
13,413
16,200
1,534
2008
09/10
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-23
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Springfield, IL
—
1,717
7,622
—
—
1,717
7,622
9,339
935
2009
09/10
35
Onalaska, WI
—
1,963
—
6,817
—
1,733
6,817
8,550
632
2011
10/10
(m)
40
Ocala, FL
—
3,315
8,908
—
—
3,315
8,908
12,223
1,071
2008
10/10
35
Bowling Green, KY
—
1,777
7,319
—
—
1,777
7,319
9,096
723
2007
07/11
35
Eau Claire, WI
—
2,263
8,418
—
—
2,263
8,418
10,681
832
2008
07/11
35
Roanoke, VA
—
1,769
8,120
—
—
1,769
8,120
9,889
802
2008
07/11
35
Greenfield, IN
—
878
—
6,166
—
878
6,166
7,044
96
2014
12/13
(m)
40
Gate Petroleum:
Concord, NC
—
852
1,201
—
—
852
1,201
2,053
286
2001
06/05
40
Rocky Mount, NC
—
259
1,164
—
—
259
1,164
1,423
278
2000
06/05
40
Gerber Collision:
Garner, NC
—
352
1,056
—
—
352
1,056
1,408
95
1972
03/13
20
Estero, FL
—
839
—
—
—
839
(e)
839
(e)
(e)
10/14
(m)
(e)
Woodstock, GA
—
328
1,291
—
—
328
1,291
1,619
5
1990
11/14
30
Roswell, GA
—
958
—
—
—
958
(e)
958
(e)
(e)
12/14
(m)
(e)
Golden Corral:
Lake Placid, FL
—
115
305
54
—
115
359
474
297
1985
05/85
35
Tampa, FL
—
1,188
1,339
—
—
1,188
1,339
2,527
437
1998
12/01
40
Temple Terrace, FL
—
1,330
1,391
—
—
1,330
1,391
2,721
453
1997
12/01
40
Goodwill:
Sealy, TX
—
612
675
644
—
612
1,319
1,931
310
1982
03/99
40
Gordmans:
Avon, IN
—
1,302
—
4,178
—
1,302
4,178
5,480
257
2012
12/11
(m)
40
Wyoming, MI
—
1,322
—
4,505
—
1,322
4,505
5,827
(q)
2014
10/13
(m)
(q)
Saginaw, MI
—
763
—
4,082
—
763
4,082
4,845
(q)
2014
02/14
(m)
(q)
Great Clips:
Swansea, IL
—
46
132
157
—
46
290
336
30
1997
12/01
(g)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-24
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Lapeer, MI
—
27
194
—
—
27
184
211
35
2007
10/05
40
Green Light Convenience:
Moosic, PA
—
323
309
—
—
323
309
632
145
1980
08/05
20
Guitar Center:
Roseville, MN
—
1,599
1,419
23
—
1,599
1,442
3,041
322
1994
08/06
40
GymKix:
Copperas Cove, TX
—
204
432
171
—
204
603
807
232
1972
11/98
40
H&R Block:
Swansea, IL
—
46
132
69
—
46
201
247
86
1997
12/01
40
Hancock Fabrics:
Buford, GA
—
751
1,979
329
—
751
2,308
3,059
531
2003
07/04
(g)
40
Harbor Freight Tools:
Federal Way, WA
—
2,037
1,662
438
—
2,037
2,100
4,137
778
1994
06/98
40
Gastonia, NC
—
994
1,513
146
—
994
1,659
2,653
394
2004
12/04
40
Plainfield, IN
—
503
—
—
—
503
(e)
503
(e)
(e)
12/14
(m)
(e)
Harvey's Bar & Grill:
Bay City, MI
—
647
634
—
—
647
634
1,281
207
1997
12/01
40
Hastings:
Nacogdoches, TX
—
397
1,257
—
—
397
1,257
1,654
507
1997
11/98
40
Havertys Furniture:
Pensacola, FL
—
633
1,595
66
—
603
1,661
2,264
742
1994
06/96
40
Bowie, MD
—
1,966
4,221
—
—
1,966
4,221
6,187
1,695
1997
12/97
39
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-25
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Health Source Chiropractic:
Houston, TX
—
112
509
302
—
112
811
923
134
1995
08/06
40
Healthy Pet:
Suwanee, GA
—
175
1,038
—
—
175
1,038
1,213
209
1997
12/06
40
Colonial Heights, VA
—
160
746
—
—
160
746
906
148
1996
01/07
40
Hear USA:
Lapeer, MI
—
29
211
—
—
29
201
230
38
2007
10/05
40
Hibbett Sports:
Sealy, TX
—
208
230
—
—
208
230
438
95
1982
03/99
(g)
40
Hog Pit:
Tucson, AZ
—
827
305
18
—
845
305
1,150
114
1974
12/01
40
Hollywood Feed:
Ridgeland, MS
—
343
411
362
—
343
773
1,116
135
1997
08/06
40
Home Decor:
Memphis, TN
—
549
540
364
—
549
904
1,453
341
1998
12/97
40
Home Depot:
Sunrise, FL
—
5,149
—
—
—
5,149
(i)
5,149
(i)
(i)
05/03
(i)
Home Zone Furniture:
Arlington, TX
—
435
2,300
334
—
435
2,634
3,069
653
1996
06/96
38
HomeGoods:
Fairfax, VA
—
523
756
1,585
—
971
2,341
3,312
811
1995
12/95
40
Hometown Urgent Care:
Warren, OH
—
562
468
100
—
562
568
1,130
162
1997
12/01
40
Hooters:
Tampa, FL
—
784
505
—
—
784
505
1,289
165
1993
12/01
40
Humana:
Sunrise, FL
—
800
253
—
—
800
253
1,053
67
1984
05/04
40
Hurricane Grill and Wings:
Chandler, AZ
—
655
791
57
—
655
849
1,504
254
1997
12/01
40
Hy-Vee:
St. Joseph, MO
—
1,580
2,849
—
—
1,580
2,849
4,429
876
1991
09/02
40
Insurance Auto Auctions:
New Orleans, LA
—
1,445
—
4,123
—
1,445
3,987
5,432
172
1993
06/13
(m)
30
E Dundee, IL
—
2,772
—
—
—
2,772
(e)
2,772
(e)
(e)
01/14
(m)
(e)
Int'l House of Pancakes:
Midwest City, OK
—
407
—
—
—
407
(i)
407
(i)
(i)
11/00
(i)
Ankeny, IA
—
693
515
—
—
693
515
1,208
164
2002
06/05
30
ISD Renal:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
406
4,036
—
—
406
4,036
4,442
409
1978
12/11
30
Kendallville, IN
—
66
2,748
—
—
66
2,748
2,814
239
2007
12/11
35
Memphis, TN
—
180
3,223
—
—
180
3,223
3,403
327
2002
12/11
30
Memphis, TN
—
283
4,146
—
—
283
4,146
4,429
420
2001
12/11
30
J & J Insurance:
Hollywood, FL
—
195
44
18
—
119
—
119
—
1960
12/05
15
Jack in the Box:
Plano, TX
—
1,055
1,237
—
—
1,055
1,237
2,292
295
2001
06/05
40
Jacobson Industrial:
Des Moines, IA
—
61
112
—
—
61
112
173
54
1973
06/05
20
Jared Jewelers:
Richmond, VA
—
955
1,336
—
—
955
1,336
2,291
436
1998
12/01
40
Brandon, FL
—
1,197
1,182
—
—
1,197
1,182
2,379
374
2001
05/02
40
Lithonia, GA
—
1,271
1,216
—
—
1,271
1,216
2,487
384
2001
05/02
40
Houston, TX
—
1,676
1,440
—
—
1,676
1,440
3,116
433
1999
12/02
40
Oviedo, FL
—
1,328
—
—
—
1,328
(c)
1,328
(c)
1998
06/13
(c)
Jazzercise Fitness Center:
Orlando, FL
17
(h)
37
101
—
—
37
101
138
28
2001
02/04
40
Jiffy Lube:
Auburn, MA
—
455
856
—
—
455
856
1,311
11
1988
07/14
35
Ayer, MA
—
326
792
—
—
326
792
1,118
12
1989
07/14
30
Barrington, IL
—
371
612
—
—
371
612
983
9
1986
07/14
30
Berwyn, IL
—
359
709
—
—
359
709
1,068
9
1985
07/14
35
Bolingbrook, IL
—
185
562
—
—
185
562
747
9
1986
07/14
30
Burbank, IL
—
156
418
—
—
156
418
574
10
1986
07/14
20
Plattsburgh, NY
—
127
421
—
—
127
421
548
8
1993
07/14
25
Romeoville, IL
—
158
557
—
—
158
557
715
9
1988
07/14
30
Worcester, MA
—
287
827
—
—
287
827
1,114
11
1988
07/14
35
Jin's Asian Cafe:
Sealy, TX
—
67
74
—
—
67
74
141
30
1982
03/99
40
Jo-Ann etc:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
818
896
12
—
818
909
1,727
479
1967
11/93
40
St. Peters, MO
—
1,741
5,406
1,233
—
1,741
6,639
8,380
1,417
2005
06/05
(g)
40
Johnny Carino's:
Lubbock, TX
—
1,007
1,206
—
—
1,007
1,206
2,213
393
1995
12/01
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-26
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Kangaroo Express:
Carthage, NC
—
485
354
—
—
485
354
839
74
1989
08/06
40
Sanford, NC
—
666
661
—
—
666
661
1,327
138
2000
08/06
40
Sanford, NC
—
1,638
1,371
—
—
1,638
1,371
3,009
287
2003
08/06
40
Siler City, NC
—
586
645
—
—
586
645
1,231
135
1998
08/06
40
West End, NC
—
426
516
—
—
397
516
913
108
1999
08/06
40
Belleview, FL
—
471
1,451
—
—
471
1,451
1,922
304
2006
08/06
40
Jacksonville, FL
—
683
1,362
—
—
683
1,362
2,045
285
1969
08/06
40
Jacksonville, FL
—
807
1,239
—
—
807
1,239
2,046
259
1975
08/06
40
Destin, FL
—
1,366
1,192
—
—
1,366
1,192
2,558
247
2000
09/06
40
Niceville, FL (n)
—
1,434
1,124
—
—
1,434
1,124
2,558
233
2000
09/06
40
Kill Devil Hills, NC
—
490
741
—
—
490
741
1,231
152
1995
10/06
40
Kill Devil Hills, NC
—
679
552
—
—
679
552
1,231
113
1990
10/06
40
Interlachen, FL
—
519
1,500
—
—
519
1,500
2,019
255
2007
10/06
40
Clarksville, TN
—
276
955
—
—
276
955
1,231
192
1999
12/06
40
Clarksville, TN
—
521
710
—
—
521
710
1,231
143
1999
12/06
40
Gallatin, TN
—
474
757
—
—
474
757
1,231
152
1999
12/06
40
Midland City, AL
—
729
2,538
—
—
729
2,538
3,267
510
2006
12/06
40
Naples, FL
—
3,195
1,403
—
—
2,985
1,403
4,388
282
2001
12/06
40
Oxford, MS
—
440
1,097
—
—
440
1,097
1,537
220
1998
12/06
40
Columbiana, AL
—
771
989
—
—
771
989
1,760
197
1982
01/07
40
Naples, FL
—
3,162
1,597
—
—
3,162
1,597
4,759
314
1995
02/07
40
Longs, SC
—
745
758
—
—
745
758
1,503
148
2001
03/07
40
Kentwood, LA
—
985
891
—
—
985
891
1,876
174
2001
03/07
40
Dothan, AL
—
774
1,886
—
—
774
1,886
2,660
367
2007
03/07
40
Naples, FL
—
2,412
1,589
—
—
2,412
1,589
4,001
303
2000
05/07
40
Cary, NC
—
1,314
2,125
—
—
1,314
2,125
3,439
392
2007
08/07
40
Havelock, NC
—
170
681
—
—
170
681
851
10
1962
07/14
30
Statesville, NC
—
249
653
—
—
249
653
902
9
1960
07/14
35
KARM Home Store:
Knoxville, TN
—
467
735
—
—
467
735
1,202
293
1999
01/98
(f)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-27
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Kash n' Karry:
Seffner, FL
—
322
1,222
—
—
322
1,222
1,544
342
1983
03/99
40
Keg Steakhouse:
Lynnwood, WA
—
1,256
649
—
—
1,256
649
1,905
212
1992
12/01
40
KFC:
Fenton, MO
—
307
496
—
—
307
496
803
339
1985
07/92
33
Erie, PA
—
517
496
—
—
517
496
1,013
162
1996
12/01
40
Marysville, WA
—
647
546
—
—
647
546
1,193
178
1996
12/01
40
Evansville, IN
—
370
767
—
—
370
767
1,137
165
2004
05/06
40
Hampton, VA
—
251
1,173
—
—
251
1,173
1,424
83
2001
11/12
30
Mechanicsville, VA
—
482
422
—
—
482
422
904
36
1989
11/12
25
Newport News, VA
—
461
883
—
—
461
883
1,344
63
2001
11/12
30
Newport News, VA
—
572
442
—
—
572
442
1,014
38
1986
11/12
25
Newport News, VA
—
582
392
—
—
582
392
974
33
1985
11/12
25
Richmond, VA
—
532
472
—
—
532
472
1,004
40
1986
11/12
25
Richmond, VA
—
452
452
—
—
452
452
904
38
1984
11/12
25
Richmond, VA
—
552
532
—
—
552
532
1,084
45
1984
11/12
25
Richmond, VA
—
492
452
—
—
492
452
944
27
2003
11/12
35
Richmond, VA
—
481
1,253
—
—
481
1,253
1,734
106
1990
11/12
25
Virginia Beach, VA
—
402
482
—
—
402
482
884
41
1984
11/12
25
Ahoskie, NC
—
393
1,012
—
—
393
1,012
1,405
42
1988
12/13
25
Elizabeth City, NC
—
197
1,209
—
—
197
1,209
1,406
50
1988
12/13
25
Brownsville, TX
—
404
374
—
—
404
374
778
10
2003
01/14
35
Brownsville, TX
—
334
865
—
—
334
865
1,199
33
1990
01/14
25
Copperas Cove, TX
—
256
747
—
—
256
747
1,003
24
2001
01/14
30
Del Rio, TX
—
453
246
—
—
453
246
699
8
1995
01/14
30
Eagle Pass, TX
—
226
1,071
—
—
226
1,071
1,297
41
1992
01/14
25
Edinburg, TX
—
452
1,237
—
—
452
1,237
1,689
40
1996
01/14
30
Harker Heights, TX
—
275
1,218
—
—
275
1,218
1,493
33
2008
01/14
35
Harlingen, TX
—
128
1,708
—
—
128
1,708
1,836
65
1992
01/14
25
Jacksonville, TX
—
69
562
—
—
69
562
631
22
1985
01/14
25
Killeen, TX
—
226
1,228
—
—
226
1,228
1,454
39
1993
01/14
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-28
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Laredo, TX
—
265
1,580
—
—
265
1,580
1,845
50
1996
01/14
30
Marshall, TX
—
89
709
—
—
89
709
798
27
1985
01/14
25
McAllen, TX
—
491
1,051
—
—
491
1,051
1,542
40
1987
01/14
25
Mission, TX
—
137
1,404
—
—
137
1,404
1,541
45
1993
01/14
30
Palestine, TX
—
89
484
—
—
89
484
573
19
1996
01/14
25
Pharr, TX
—
167
581
—
—
167
581
748
19
1999
01/14
30
Rio Grande City, TX
—
256
394
—
—
256
394
650
11
2004
01/14
35
S Padre Island, TX
—
856
30
—
—
856
30
886
1
1994
01/14
30
San Benito, TX
—
177
503
—
—
177
503
680
16
1994
01/14
30
Temple, TX
—
246
1,188
—
—
246
1,188
1,434
46
1985
01/14
25
Tyler, TX
—
709
30
—
—
709
30
739
1
1994
01/14
30
Waco, TX
—
463
246
—
—
463
246
709
8
1993
01/14
30
Waco, TX
—
276
620
—
—
276
620
896
24
1984
01/14
25
Weslaco, TX
—
236
1,561
—
—
236
1,561
1,797
50
1995
01/14
30
Kohl's:
Florence, AL
—
818
1,047
—
—
818
698
1,516
186
2006
06/04
40
Kroger:
Elkhart, IN
—
541
1,550
—
—
541
1,550
2,091
47
1979
07/14
15
Kum & Go:
Omaha, NE
—
393
214
—
—
393
214
607
102
1979
06/05
20
Kwik Pik:
Bear Creek, PA
—
191
230
—
—
191
230
421
108
1980
08/05
20
Bradford, PA
—
184
762
—
—
184
762
946
357
1983
08/05
20
Coraopolis, PA (n)
—
476
347
—
—
476
347
823
163
1983
08/05
20
St Clair, PA
—
212
475
—
—
212
475
687
223
1984
08/05
20
Bear Creek Township, PA (n)
—
689
275
—
—
689
275
964
128
1980
09/05
20
Beech Creek, PA
—
477
613
—
—
477
613
1,090
137
1988
01/06
40
Canisteo, NY
—
142
485
—
—
142
485
627
109
1983
01/06
40
Curwensville, PA
—
226
608
—
—
226
608
834
136
1983
01/06
40
Ellwood City, PA
—
196
526
—
—
196
526
722
118
1987
01/06
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-29
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Hastings, PA
—
199
455
—
—
199
455
654
102
1989
01/06
40
Jersey Shore, PA
—
515
381
—
—
515
381
896
85
1960
01/06
40
Leeper, PA
—
286
644
—
—
286
644
930
144
1987
01/06
40
Lewisberry, PA
—
412
534
—
—
412
534
946
120
1988
01/06
40
Mercersburg, PA
—
672
746
—
—
672
746
1,418
167
1988
01/06
40
New Florence, PA
—
298
812
—
—
298
812
1,110
182
1989
01/06
40
Newstead, NY
—
255
835
—
—
255
835
1,090
187
1990
01/06
40
Philipsburg, PA
—
428
269
—
—
428
269
697
60
1978
01/06
40
Plainfield, PA
—
244
383
—
—
244
383
627
86
1988
01/06
40
Reynoldsville, PA
—
113
328
—
—
113
328
441
73
1983
01/06
40
Port Royal, PA
—
238
635
—
—
238
635
873
269
1989
07/06
20
LA Fitness:
Little Rock, AR
—
3,113
2,660
4,125
—
3,113
6,785
9,898
1,169
1997
09/98
40
Sarasota, FL
—
471
1,344
4,450
—
471
5,794
6,265
721
1983
03/99
(g)
40
Centerville, OH
—
2,700
—
8,572
—
2,700
8,572
11,272
1,188
2009
06/08
(m)
40
Warren, MI
—
2,360
—
6,674
—
2,360
6,674
9,034
966
2009
07/08
(m)
40
Cincinnati, OH
—
5,145
—
9,011
—
5,145
9,011
14,156
1,248
2009
08/08
(m)
40
Lawrence, IN
—
1,599
—
5,867
—
1,762
5,870
7,632
642
2010
01/10
(m)
40
Laveen, AZ
—
1,665
—
5,749
—
1,665
5,749
7,414
605
2010
02/10
(m)
40
Kennesaw, GA
—
3,653
—
3,325
—
3,653
3,325
6,978
329
2011
07/10
(m)
40
Arlington, TX
—
1,166
6,214
—
—
1,166
6,214
7,380
703
2007
01/11
35
Hurst, TX
—
1,494
6,187
—
—
1,494
6,187
7,681
611
2008
07/11
35
South Plainfield, NJ
6,180
2,415
6,592
—
—
2,415
6,592
9,007
479
2006
06/12
35
McDonough, GA
—
1,503
6,727
—
—
1,503
6,727
8,230
440
2008
09/12
35
Greensburg, PA
—
1,791
7,015
—
—
1,791
7,015
8,806
358
2012
12/12
40
Indianapolis, IN
—
1,651
6,585
—
—
1,651
6,585
8,236
336
2012
12/12
40
Phoenix, AZ
—
1,601
6,540
—
—
1,601
6,540
8,141
334
2012
12/12
40
Tampa, FL
—
4,492
10,894
—
—
4,492
10,894
15,386
556
2012
12/12
40
West Dundee, IL
—
1,961
6,525
—
—
1,961
6,525
8,486
333
2012
12/12
40
Irving, TX
—
3,636
7,326
—
—
3,636
7,326
10,962
340
2006
05/13
35
Royal Oak, MI
—
3,238
8,998
—
—
3,238
8,998
12,236
332
2010
09/13
35
St. Louis Park, MN
—
3,436
8,665
—
—
3,436
8,665
12,101
258
2009
12/13
35
Pompano Beach, FL
—
7,009
—
—
—
7,009
(e)
7,009
(e)
(e)
12/14
(m)
(e)
LaPetite Academy:
Albuquerque, NM
—
332
1,166
—
—
332
1,166
1,498
18
1989
07/14
30
Ft. Worth, TX
—
140
383
—
—
140
383
523
12
1981
07/14
15
Moore, OK
—
119
412
—
—
119
412
531
13
1982
07/14
15
Oklahoma City, OK
—
100
391
—
—
100
391
491
12
1982
07/14
15
Last Stop West:
Azle, TX
—
648
859
—
—
648
859
1,507
162
1970
06/07
40
Lil' Champ:
Gainesville, FL
—
900
—
1,800
—
900
1,800
2,700
351
2006
07/05
(m)
40
Jacksonville, FL
—
2,225
3,265
—
—
2,225
3,265
5,490
538
2006
08/05
40
Ocala, FL
—
846
—
1,564
—
846
1,564
2,410
295
2006
02/06
(m)
40
LoanMax:
Bridgeview, IL
—
673
744
—
—
673
744
1,417
243
1997
12/01
40
Logan's Roadhouse:
Alexandria, LA
—
1,218
3,049
—
—
1,218
3,049
4,267
619
1998
11/06
40
Beckley, WV
—
1,396
2,405
—
—
1,396
2,405
3,801
488
2006
11/06
40
Cookeville, TN
—
1,262
2,271
—
—
1,262
2,271
3,533
461
1997
11/06
40
Greenwood, IN
—
1,341
2,105
—
—
1,341
2,105
3,446
428
2000
11/06
40
Hurst, TX
—
1,858
1,916
—
—
1,858
1,916
3,774
389
1999
11/06
40
Jackson, TN
—
1,200
2,246
—
—
1,200
2,246
3,446
456
1994
11/06
40
Lake Charles, LA
—
1,285
2,202
—
—
1,285
2,202
3,487
447
1998
11/06
40
McAllen, TX
—
1,608
2,178
—
—
1,608
2,178
3,786
442
2005
11/06
40
Roanoke, VA
—
2,302
1,947
—
—
2,302
1,947
4,249
396
1998
11/06
40
San Marcos, TX
—
837
1,453
—
—
837
1,453
2,290
295
2000
11/06
40
Smyrna, TN
—
1,335
2,047
—
—
1,335
2,047
3,382
416
2002
11/06
40
Franklin, TN
—
2,519
1,705
—
—
2,519
1,705
4,224
343
1995
12/06
40
Southhaven, MS
—
1,298
1,338
—
—
1,298
1,338
2,636
269
2005
12/06
40
Columbus, MS
—
707
—
1,681
—
707
1,681
2,388
142
2011
11/10
(m)
40
Overland Park, KS
—
1,166
—
1,741
—
1,166
1,741
2,907
136
2011
04/11
(m)
40
Nashville, TN
—
844
—
1,592
—
844
1,592
2,436
124
2011
06/11
(m)
40
Rogers, AR
—
900
—
1,545
—
909
1,536
2,445
107
2012
09/11
(m)
40
Kissimmee, FL
—
1,159
—
1,908
—
1,159
1,908
3,067
117
2012
01/12
(m)
40
Marion, IL
—
1,016
—
1,674
—
1,016
1,674
2,690
96
2012
03/12
(m)
40
Pooler, GA
—
1,159
—
1,720
—
1,159
1,720
2,879
81
2013
03/12
(m)
40
Cullman, AL
—
889
—
1,585
—
889
1,585
2,474
87
2012
04/12
(m)
40
Lebanon, TN
—
789
—
1,725
—
789
1,725
2,514
88
2012
06/12
(m)
40
Chester, VA
—
871
—
1,697
—
871
1,697
2,568
83
2013
07/12
(m)
40
Gonzales, LA
—
975
—
1,696
—
975
1,696
2,671
76
2013
10/12
(m)
40
Madison, AL
—
689
—
1,657
—
689
1,657
2,346
67
2013
11/12
(m)
40
Hopkinsville, KY
—
644
—
1,788
—
644
1,788
2,432
32
2014
09/13
(m)
40
Muscle Shoals, AL
—
907
—
1,506
—
907
1,506
2,413
(q)
2014
06/14
(m)
(q)
Lowe's:
Memphis, TN
—
3,215
9,170
24
—
3,215
9,194
12,409
2,881
2001
06/02
40
Magic China Café:
Orlando, FL
19
(h)
40
111
—
—
40
111
151
30
2001
02/04
40
Magic Mountain:
Columbus, OH
—
5,380
2,693
25
—
5,380
2,718
8,098
509
1990
06/07
40
Columbus, OH
—
2,076
1,906
124
—
2,076
2,030
4,106
368
1990
06/07
40
Manny's Barber Shop:
Mesa, AZ
—
43
113
367
—
43
480
523
105
1997
12/01
40
Mariscos Morales Mexican Restaurant:
Gresham, OR
—
817
108
28
—
817
136
953
37
1993
12/01
40
Mattress Firm:
Baton Rouge, LA
—
609
914
—
—
609
914
1,523
434
1995
12/95
(m)
40
Buford, GA
—
635
1,635
465
—
635
2,100
2,735
457
2003
07/04
(g)
40
Lancaster, OH
—
600
—
793
—
600
671
1,271
40
2012
01/08
(g)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-30
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Plainfield, IN
—
379
—
1,267
—
379
1,267
1,646
12
2014
01/14
(m)
40
Fayetteville, AR
—
891
2,229
—
—
891
2,229
3,120
65
1998
02/14
30
Pocatello, ID
—
268
—
—
—
268
(e)
268
(e)
(e)
09/14
(m)
(e)
South Jordan, UT
—
719
—
—
—
719
(e)
719
(e)
(e)
11/14
(m)
(e)
MC Sports:
Lapeer, MI
—
408
2,086
—
—
408
2,031
2,439
376
2007
10/05
40
MedExpress Urgent Care:
Fairmont, WV
—
245
1,859
—
—
245
1,859
2,104
139
2011
05/12
35
Hanover, PA
—
533
1,521
—
—
533
1,521
2,054
114
2011
05/12
35
Hermitage, PA
—
445
2,108
—
—
445
2,108
2,553
158
2011
05/12
35
Latrobe, PA
—
681
1,511
—
—
681
1,511
2,192
113
2011
05/12
35
Mt. Pleasant, PA
—
593
1,482
—
—
593
1,482
2,075
111
2011
05/12
35
Pittsburgh, PA
—
227
1,936
—
—
227
1,936
2,163
169
1970
05/12
30
Martinsburg, WV
—
917
—
650
—
917
650
1,567
21
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Wheeling, WV
—
485
1,232
—
—
485
1,232
1,717
74
1989
03/13
30
Huntington, WV
—
990
—
735
—
1,017
735
1,752
22
2013
08/13
(m)
40
Anderson, IN
—
777
—
661
—
777
661
1,438
17
2013
08/13
(m)
40
Terre Haute, IN
—
144
1,616
—
—
144
1,616
1,760
74
1991
08/13
30
Merchant's Tires:
Hampton, VA
—
180
427
—
—
180
427
607
105
1986
03/05
40
Newport News, VA
—
234
259
—
—
234
259
493
63
1986
03/05
40
Norfolk, VA
—
398
508
—
—
398
508
906
124
1986
03/05
40
Rockville, MD
—
1,030
306
—
—
1,030
306
1,336
75
1974
03/05
40
Washington, DC
—
624
578
—
—
624
578
1,202
141
1983
03/05
40
Mi Pueblo Foods:
Palo Alto, CA
—
2,272
3,405
28
—
2,272
3,433
5,705
1,348
1998
12/98
(f)
40
Michaels:
Fairfax, VA
—
534
773
1,369
—
992
2,141
3,133
761
1995
12/95
40
Altamonte Springs, FL
—
1,947
3,267
1,198
—
1,947
3,370
5,317
415
1997
09/97
26
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-31
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Plymouth Meeting, PA
—
2,911
2,595
—
—
2,911
2,595
5,506
964
1999
10/98
(g)
40
Florissant, MO
—
523
617
1,784
—
524
2,399
2,923
296
1996
04/03
(g)
40
Miller's Ale House:
Pensacola, FL
—
1,363
1,842
—
—
1,363
1,842
3,205
195
2008
04/11
35
Oviedo, FL
—
113
—
3,785
—
113
3,785
3,898
209
2012
10/11
40
Mimi's:
Tampa, FL
—
688
2,357
—
—
688
2,357
3,045
69
2003
02/14
30
Mister Car Wash:
Anoka, MN
—
212
214
—
—
212
214
426
110
1968
04/07
15
Brooklyn Park, MN
—
438
778
—
—
438
778
1,216
240
1985
04/07
25
Cedar Rapids, IA
—
391
816
—
—
391
816
1,207
252
1989
04/07
25
Clive, IA
—
1,141
935
—
—
1,141
935
2,076
360
1983
04/07
20
Cottage Grove, MN
—
274
485
—
—
274
485
759
149
1992
04/07
25
Des Moines, IA
—
213
476
—
—
213
476
689
183
1964
04/07
20
Des Moines, IA
—
249
596
—
—
249
596
845
153
1990
04/07
30
Eden Prairie, MN
—
865
751
—
—
865
751
1,616
290
1984
04/07
20
Edina, MN
—
894
687
—
—
894
687
1,581
265
1985
04/07
20
Houston, TX
—
1,960
1,145
—
—
1,960
1,145
3,105
353
1983
04/07
25
Houston, TX
—
288
466
—
—
288
466
754
239
1970
04/07
15
Houston, TX
—
3,193
1,305
—
—
3,193
1,305
4,498
287
1995
04/07
35
Houston, TX
—
1,347
1,702
—
—
1,347
1,702
3,049
437
1984
04/07
30
Houston, TX
—
796
678
—
—
796
678
1,474
209
1986
04/07
25
Houston, TX
—
624
1,108
—
—
624
1,108
1,732
285
1988
04/07
30
Houston, TX
—
5,126
1,267
—
—
5,126
1,267
6,393
279
1995
04/07
35
Houston, TX
—
2,260
1,806
—
—
2,260
1,806
4,066
557
1975
04/07
25
Houston, TX
—
1,846
1,592
—
—
1,846
1,592
3,438
491
1983
04/07
25
Humble, TX
—
1,204
1,517
—
—
1,204
1,517
2,721
334
1993
04/07
35
Plymouth, MN
—
827
182
—
—
827
182
1,009
140
1955
04/07
10
Roseville, MN
—
861
564
—
—
861
564
1,425
217
1963
04/07
20
Spokane, WA
—
1,253
1,146
—
—
1,253
1,146
2,399
252
1997
04/07
35
Spokane, WA
—
214
580
—
—
214
580
794
149
1990
04/07
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-32
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
St. Cloud, MN (n)
—
243
391
—
—
242
391
633
151
1986
04/07
20
Stillwater, MN
—
289
214
—
—
289
214
503
110
1971
04/07
15
Sugarland, TX
—
3,789
1,972
—
—
3,789
1,972
5,761
434
1995
04/07
35
West St Paul, MN
—
836
236
—
—
836
236
1,072
91
1972
04/07
20
Rochester, MN
—
1,055
2,327
—
—
1,055
2,327
3,382
419
2003
10/07
40
Rochester, MN
—
319
451
—
—
319
451
770
81
1994
10/07
40
Birmingham, AL
—
2,378
2,145
—
—
2,378
2,145
4,523
509
1985
11/07
30
Clearwater, FL
—
825
765
—
—
825
765
1,590
218
1969
11/07
25
Mesquite, TX
—
1,596
2,201
—
—
1,596
2,201
3,797
627
1987
11/07
25
Seminole, FL
—
2,166
1,496
—
—
2,166
1,496
3,662
355
1985
11/07
30
Tampa, FL
—
2,993
1,669
—
—
2,993
1,669
4,662
476
1969
11/07
25
Vestavia Hills, AL
—
1,009
956
—
—
1,009
956
1,965
272
1967
11/07
25
El Paso, TX
—
1,424
1,306
—
—
1,424
1,306
2,730
306
1986
12/07
30
El Paso, TX
—
1,807
2,287
—
—
1,807
2,287
4,094
403
1983
12/07
40
El Paso, TX
—
664
824
—
—
664
824
1,488
145
1991
12/07
40
El Paso, TX
—
1,399
1,468
—
—
1,399
1,468
2,867
259
1991
12/07
40
El Paso, TX
—
988
1,046
—
—
988
1,046
2,034
184
1998
12/07
40
Tampa, FL
—
541
829
—
—
541
829
1,370
156
1978
04/10
25
Springfield, MO
—
1,064
2,109
—
—
1,064
2,109
3,173
243
1990
07/11
30
Springfield, MO
—
1,188
2,817
—
—
1,188
2,817
4,005
278
2000
07/11
35
Springfield, MO
—
642
1,767
—
—
642
1,767
2,409
203
1979
07/11
30
Missouri City, TX
—
549
1,553
—
—
549
1,553
2,102
139
2004
11/11
35
Bountiful, UT
—
484
292
—
—
484
292
776
29
1995
01/12
30
Salt Lake City, UT
—
522
1,806
—
—
522
1,806
2,328
178
1993
01/12
30
Tucson, AZ
—
742
2,226
—
—
742
2,226
2,968
219
2000
01/12
30
Tucson, AZ
—
946
2,566
—
—
946
2,566
3,512
253
2003
01/12
30
Tucson, AZ
—
108
778
—
—
108
778
886
77
2004
01/12
30
Tucson, AZ
—
493
345
—
—
493
345
838
29
2007
01/12
35
Cedar Park, TX
—
794
1,316
—
—
794
1,316
2,110
102
2009
04/12
35
Spokane Valley, WA
—
454
857
—
—
454
857
1,311
66
2005
04/12
35
Salt Lake City, UT
—
781
2,303
—
—
781
2,303
3,084
162
2009
07/12
35
Charlotte, NC
—
693
1,315
—
—
693
1,315
2,008
121
1981
09/12
25
College Park, GA
—
322
1,056
—
—
322
1,056
1,378
69
2008
09/12
35
Griffin, GA
—
401
2,897
—
—
401
2,897
3,298
190
2007
09/12
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-33
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Hampton, GA
—
421
1,996
—
—
421
1,996
2,417
131
2006
09/12
35
Lilburn, GA
—
381
2,426
—
—
381
2,426
2,807
159
2007
09/12
35
Matthews, NC
—
664
664
—
—
664
664
1,328
51
1990
09/12
30
Oxford, AL
—
301
3,607
—
—
301
3,607
3,908
236
2008
09/12
35
Pineville, NC
—
723
1,195
—
—
723
1,195
1,918
91
1990
09/12
30
Clermont, FL
—
783
2,328
—
—
783
2,328
3,111
147
2006
10/12
35
Springfield, MO
—
474
736
—
—
474
736
1,210
55
2006
10/12
30
Abilene, TX
—
641
3,093
—
—
641
3,093
3,734
188
2006
11/12
35
Abilene, TX
—
101
426
—
—
101
426
527
26
2009
11/12
35
Lubbock, TX
—
411
2,534
—
—
411
2,534
2,945
179
2003
11/12
30
Lubbock, TX
—
400
3,403
—
—
400
3,403
3,803
207
2004
11/12
35
Lubbock, TX
—
350
2,984
—
—
350
2,984
3,334
181
2007
11/12
35
Ephrata, PA
—
241
2,797
—
—
241
2,797
3,038
228
1987
12/12
25
Lancaster, PA
—
920
7,894
—
—
920
7,894
8,814
537
1999
12/12
30
Sinking Spring, PA
—
1,251
4,735
—
—
1,251
4,735
5,986
322
2005
12/12
30
York, PA
—
591
4,605
—
—
591
4,605
5,196
313
1995
12/12
30
Atlanta, GA
—
1,773
4,528
—
—
1,773
4,528
6,301
264
2003
12/12
35
Atlanta, GA
—
1,633
5,378
—
—
1,633
5,378
7,011
366
1998
12/12
30
Urbandale, IA
—
485
374
—
—
485
374
859
21
1990
04/13
30
Houston, TX
—
752
1,736
—
—
752
1,736
2,488
76
2005
06/13
35
Houston, TX
—
1,573
2,315
—
—
1,573
2,315
3,888
102
2006
06/13
35
Houston, TX
—
542
1,876
—
—
542
1,876
2,418
83
2012
06/13
35
Houston, TX
—
551
2,967
—
—
551
2,967
3,518
183
1980
06/13
25
Houston, TX
—
713
964
—
—
713
964
1,677
42
2005
06/13
35
Humble, TX
—
611
3,327
—
—
611
3,327
3,938
147
2006
06/13
35
Katy, TX
—
421
2,157
—
—
421
2,157
2,578
111
2002
06/13
30
Spring, TX
—
652
2,627
—
—
652
2,627
3,279
116
2006
06/13
35
Tucson, AZ
—
654
1,357
—
—
654
1,357
2,011
58
1986
09/13
30
Rochester, MN
—
396
264
—
—
396
264
660
8
1987
02/14
30
Tucson, AZ
—
988
272
—
—
988
272
1,260
8
1987
02/14
30
Movie Tavern Theatre:
Covington, LA
—
1,081
6,779
—
—
1,081
6,779
7,860
66
1993
09/14
30
Baton Rouge, LA
—
1,497
—
—
—
1,497
(e)
1,497
(e)
(e)
11/14
(m)
(e)
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-34
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Muchas Gracias Mexican Restaurant:
Salem, OR
—
556
736
—
—
556
736
1,292
240
1996
12/01
40
My Big Fat Greek Restaurant:
Tucson, AZ
—
996
—
2,742
—
996
2,742
3,738
500
2007
12/06
(m)
40
National Karate Academy:
Eden Prairie, MN
—
76
211
110
—
76
321
397
97
1997
12/01
40
Natural Grocers:
Lincoln, NE
—
1,482
2,811
—
—
1,482
2,811
4,293
137
2012
04/13
35
Coeur D'Alene, ID
—
2,172
—
2,778
—
2,172
2,778
4,950
55
2014
08/13
40
Flagstaff, AZ
3,253
(p)
831
4,079
—
—
831
4,079
4,910
15
2012
11/14
35
Helena, MT
2,854
(p)
1,079
3,062
—
—
1,079
3,062
4,141
11
2012
11/14
35
Missoula, MT
2,541
(p)
929
3,222
—
—
929
3,222
4,151
12
2012
11/14
35
Sedona, AZ
2,990
(p)
1,064
3,211
—
—
1,064
3,211
4,275
11
2012
11/14
35
Steamboat Springs, CO
3,461
(p)
1,512
3,447
—
—
1,512
3,447
4,959
12
2012
11/14
35
Independence, MO
—
912
5,002
—
—
912
5,002
5,914
7
2002
12/14
30
Nebraskaland Tire:
Park City, KS
—
214
687
—
—
214
687
901
328
1989
06/05
20
Nitlantika:
Hollywood, FL
—
383
88
37
—
234
—
234
—
1960
12/05
15
Northern Tool:
Asheville, NC
—
519
2,998
—
—
519
2,998
3,517
225
2007
05/12
35
Spartanburg, SC
2,922
654
3,174
—
—
654
3,174
3,828
31
2007
09/14
30
Office Depot:
Gastonia, NC
—
1,554
2,367
946
—
1,554
3,313
4,867
681
2004
12/04
40
OfficeMax:
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-35
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Cincinnati, OH
—
543
1,575
—
—
543
1,575
2,118
806
1994
07/94
40
Evanston, IL
—
1,868
1,758
—
—
1,868
1,758
3,626
860
1995
06/95
40
Altamonte Springs, FL
—
1,690
3,050
—
—
1,690
3,050
4,740
1,440
1995
01/96
40
Sacramento, CA
—
1,144
2,961
—
—
1,144
2,961
4,105
1,333
1996
12/96
40
Salinas, CA
—
1,353
1,829
—
—
1,353
1,829
3,182
817
1995
02/97
40
Redding, CA
—
667
2,182
—
—
667
2,182
2,849
957
1997
06/97
40
Kelso, WA
—
868
—
1,806
—
868
1,806
2,674
765
1998
09/97
(g)
40
Lynchburg, VA
—
562
—
1,851
—
562
1,851
2,413
754
1998
02/98
(m)
40
Tigard, OR
—
1,540
2,247
—
—
1,540
2,247
3,787
906
1995
11/98
40
Griffin, GA
—
685
—
1,802
—
685
1,802
2,487
708
1999
11/98
(g)
40
Omaha, NE
—
664
1,778
—
—
664
1,778
2,442
41
1995
07/14
20
Weatherford, TX
—
548
2,436
—
—
548
2,436
2,984
24
1999
09/14
30
Orchard Supply Hardware:
Pismo Beach, CA
—
2,436
1,997
2,339
—
2,436
4,336
6,772
442
1989
12/11
(o)
25
San Jose, CA
—
4,092
4,279
3,307
—
4,092
7,586
11,678
802
1982
12/11
(o)
25
San Jose, CA
—
6,406
2,457
3,374
—
6,406
5,831
12,237
586
1982
12/11
(o)
25
Chico, CA
—
1,782
4,563
746
—
1,782
5,308
7,090
407
2002
07/12
(o)
30
Clovis, CA
—
1,226
1,426
151
—
1,226
1,577
2,803
150
1982
07/12
(o)
25
Pinole, CA
—
2,784
5,195
—
—
2,784
5,195
7,979
511
1987
07/12
(o)
25
San Jose, CA
—
3,370
2,517
—
—
3,370
2,517
5,887
248
1965
07/12
25
San Jose, CA
—
5,850
4,129
—
—
5,850
4,129
9,979
406
1946
07/12
(o)
25
Van Nuys, CA
—
5,493
4,133
2,301
—
5,493
6,435
11,928
531
1988
07/12
(o)
25
Orlando Metro Gymnastics:
Orlando, FL
—
428
1,345
—
—
428
1,345
1,773
335
2003
01/05
40
Outback:
Cheyenne, WY
—
672
2,502
—
—
672
2,502
3,174
233
2001
03/12
30
Conroe, TX
—
524
583
—
—
524
583
1,107
65
1992
03/12
25
Copley Township, OH
—
753
2,407
—
—
753
2,407
3,160
269
1993
03/12
25
Coraopolis, PA
—
487
2,326
—
—
487
2,326
2,813
216
1998
03/12
30
Denver, CO
—
850
1,305
—
—
850
1,305
2,155
104
2003
03/12
35
Knoxville, TN
—
753
1,852
—
—
753
1,852
2,605
148
2004
03/12
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-36
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Largo, MD
—
1,738
2,227
—
—
1,738
2,227
3,965
207
2001
03/12
30
Lufkin, TX
—
850
1,147
—
—
850
1,147
1,997
107
1999
03/12
30
Marrero, LA
—
781
3,144
—
—
781
3,144
3,925
351
1995
03/12
25
Mechanicsville, VA
—
674
2,328
—
—
674
2,328
3,002
217
2002
03/12
30
Mt. Pleasant, SC
—
713
1,466
—
—
713
1,466
2,179
136
1999
03/12
30
Phoenix, AZ
—
821
2,284
—
—
821
2,284
3,105
213
2002
03/12
30
Shreveport, LA
—
633
3,105
—
—
633
3,105
3,738
347
1994
03/12
25
Smithfield, NC
—
772
2,345
—
—
772
2,345
3,117
187
2004
03/12
35
Stockbridge, GA
—
910
1,988
—
—
910
1,988
2,898
185
2001
03/12
30
Troy, OH
—
456
1,575
—
—
456
1,575
2,031
126
2004
03/12
35
Venice, FL
—
833
2,529
—
—
833
2,529
3,362
235
2001
03/12
30
Warrenton, VA
—
1,833
2,021
—
—
1,833
2,021
3,854
188
2001
03/12
30
Wheaton, IL
—
901
654
—
—
901
654
1,555
73
1994
03/12
25
Fultondale, AL
—
765
2,097
—
—
765
2,097
2,862
9
1998
11/14
30
Palais Royale:
Sealy, TX
—
457
504
1,769
—
462
2,273
2,735
476
1982
03/99
40
Panda Express:
Florissant, MO
—
50
59
170
—
50
228
278
28
2012
04/03
(g)
40
Pantry I Petroleum:
Avis, PA
—
392
326
—
—
392
326
718
153
1976
08/05
20
Howard, PA
—
136
375
—
—
136
375
511
84
1987
01/06
40
Patient First:
Richmond, VA
—
270
1,545
—
—
270
1,545
1,815
187
1988
05/11
30
York, PA
—
772
2,995
—
—
772
2,995
3,767
259
2011
07/11
40
Mechanicsburg, PA
—
933
3,401
—
—
933
3,401
4,334
244
2011
02/12
40
Patriot Fuels:
Vinita, OK
—
72
368
—
—
72
368
440
98
1972
07/09
20
Pawn America:
Fargo, ND
—
335
2,747
—
—
335
2,747
3,082
160
2008
12/12
35
Fridley, MN
—
1,013
4,465
—
—
1,013
4,465
5,478
304
1978
12/12
30
Sioux Falls, SD
—
207
1,490
—
—
207
1,490
1,697
101
1985
12/12
30
Mankato, MN
—
449
—
1,705
—
449
1,705
2,154
48
2013
03/13
(m)
40
Pep Boys:
Chicago, IL
—
1,077
3,756
—
—
1,077
3,756
4,833
765
1993
11/07
35
Cicero, IL
—
1,341
3,760
—
—
1,341
3,760
5,101
765
1993
11/07
35
Cornwell Heights, PA
—
2,058
3,102
—
—
2,058
3,102
5,160
884
1972
11/07
25
East Brunswick, NJ
—
2,449
5,026
—
—
2,449
5,026
7,475
1,194
1987
11/07
30
Guayama, PR
—
1,729
2,732
—
—
1,729
2,131
3,860
329
1998
11/07
33
Jacksonville, FL
—
810
2,331
—
—
810
2,331
3,141
475
1989
11/07
35
Joliet, IL
—
1,506
3,727
—
—
1,506
3,727
5,233
759
1993
11/07
35
Lansing, IL
—
869
3,440
—
—
869
3,440
4,309
700
1993
11/07
35
Las Vegas, NV
—
1,917
2,530
—
—
1,917
2,530
4,447
515
1989
11/07
35
Marietta, GA
—
1,311
3,556
—
—
1,311
3,556
4,867
845
1987
11/07
30
Marlton, NJ
—
1,608
4,142
—
—
1,608
4,142
5,750
984
1983
11/07
30
Philadelphia, PA
—
1,300
3,830
—
—
1,300
3,830
5,130
780
1995
11/07
35
Quakertown, PA
—
1,129
3,252
—
—
1,129
3,252
4,381
662
1995
11/07
35
Reading, PA
—
1,189
3,367
—
—
1,189
2,819
4,008
513
1989
11/07
28
Roswell, GA
—
931
2,732
—
—
931
2,732
3,663
649
2007
11/07
30
Turnersville, NJ
—
990
3,494
—
—
990
3,494
4,484
830
1986
11/07
30
Houston, TX
—
734
3,028
—
—
734
3,028
3,762
475
1994
04/10
30
Perkins Restaurant:
Des Moines, IA
—
256
136
—
—
256
136
392
130
1976
06/05
10
Des Moines, IA
—
270
218
—
—
270
218
488
208
1977
06/05
10
Des Moines, IA
—
226
203
—
—
226
203
429
194
1976
06/05
10
Newton, IA
—
354
402
—
—
354
402
756
383
1979
06/05
10
Urbandale, IA
—
377
581
—
—
377
581
958
277
1979
06/05
20
Pet Paradise:
Houston, TX
—
417
2,306
—
—
417
2,306
2,723
392
2008
03/08
40
Bunnell, FL
—
316
881
—
—
316
881
1,197
148
1997
04/08
40
Charlotte, NC
—
825
—
3,231
—
825
3,231
4,056
441
2009
11/08
(m)
40
Davie, FL
—
1,138
1,069
—
—
1,138
1,069
2,207
184
2003
12/08
35
Petco:
Grand Forks, ND
—
307
910
—
—
307
910
1,217
388
1996
12/97
40
Florissant, MO
—
299
352
1,019
—
300
1,371
1,671
169
2012
04/03
(g)
40
Petro Express:
Belmont, NC
—
1,508
1,622
—
—
1,508
1,622
3,130
357
2001
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
1,291
1,839
—
—
1,291
1,839
3,130
473
1988
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
2,784
3,720
—
—
2,784
3,720
6,504
819
1998
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
1,030
1,725
—
—
1,030
1,725
2,755
443
1983
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
1,458
2,047
—
—
1,458
2,047
3,505
526
1987
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
429
425
—
—
429
425
854
109
1983
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
1,778
1,977
—
—
1,778
1,977
3,755
508
1992
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
507
698
—
—
507
698
1,205
269
1967
04/07
20
Charlotte, NC
—
629
876
—
—
623
876
1,499
225
1986
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
1,810
2,570
—
—
1,810
2,570
4,380
495
2004
04/07
40
Charlotte, NC
—
1,697
2,419
—
—
1,697
2,419
4,116
466
2005
04/07
40
Charlotte, NC
—
1,340
1,790
—
—
1,340
1,790
3,130
394
1998
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
2,165
1,965
—
—
2,165
1,965
4,130
433
1997
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
2,316
2,064
—
—
2,316
2,064
4,380
455
1996
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
1,532
1,973
—
—
1,532
1,973
3,505
434
1998
04/07
35
Concord, NC
—
1,828
1,677
—
—
1,828
1,677
3,505
369
2002
04/07
35
Concord, NC
—
2,144
1,986
—
—
2,144
1,986
4,130
437
2000
04/07
35
Denver, NC
—
2,317
1,750
—
—
2,317
1,750
4,067
385
1999
04/07
35
Fort Mill, SC
—
3,825
2,554
—
—
3,825
2,554
6,379
563
1998
04/07
35
Gastonia, NC
—
965
1,228
—
—
965
1,228
2,193
270
2001
04/07
35
Gastonia, NC
—
745
760
—
—
745
760
1,505
147
2003
04/07
40
Gastonia, NC
—
1,070
1,185
—
—
1,070
1,185
2,255
261
1990
04/07
35
Gastonia, NC
—
335
545
—
—
335
545
880
105
2000
04/07
40
Hickory, NC
—
1,975
1,530
—
—
1,975
1,530
3,505
337
2002
04/07
35
Kings Mountain, NC
—
1,210
982
—
—
1,210
982
2,192
216
1988
04/07
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-37
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Lake Wylie, SC
—
1,381
2,061
—
—
1,381
2,061
3,442
454
1998
04/07
35
Lake Wylie, SC
—
1,972
1,283
—
—
1,972
1,283
3,255
283
2003
04/07
35
Lincolnton, NC
—
723
532
—
—
723
532
1,255
137
1989
04/07
30
Mineral Springs, NC
—
678
577
—
—
678
577
1,255
111
2002
04/07
40
Monroe, NC
—
421
834
—
—
421
834
1,255
184
1997
04/07
35
Monroe, NC
—
857
1,023
—
—
857
1,023
1,880
197
2004
04/07
40
Monroe, NC
—
709
796
—
—
709
796
1,505
175
1999
04/07
35
Rock Hill, SC
—
3,095
1,910
—
—
3,095
1,910
5,005
421
1999
04/07
35
Rock Hill, SC
—
2,119
1,886
—
—
2,119
1,886
4,005
415
1998
04/07
35
Rock Hill, SC
—
778
727
—
—
778
727
1,505
187
1990
04/07
30
Statesville, NC
—
1,886
2,182
—
—
1,864
2,182
4,046
480
1999
04/07
35
Waxhaw, NC
—
508
747
—
—
508
747
1,255
144
2002
04/07
40
York, SC
—
2,306
1,449
—
—
2,306
1,449
3,755
319
1999
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
1,834
1,214
—
—
1,834
1,214
3,048
231
1997
05/07
40
Charlotte, NC
—
1,849
2,280
—
—
1,849
2,280
4,129
435
2005
05/07
40
Rock Hill, SC
—
3,108
2,146
—
—
3,108
2,146
5,254
409
1999
05/07
40
PetSense:
Kingsville, TX
—
499
458
224
—
499
682
1,181
169
1995
12/01
40
PetSmart:
Chicago, IL
—
2,724
3,566
—
—
2,724
3,566
6,290
1,452
1998
09/98
40
Pier I Imports:
Anchorage, AK
—
928
1,663
—
—
928
1,663
2,591
783
1995
02/96
40
Memphis, TN
—
713
822
—
—
713
822
1,535
360
1997
09/96
(f)
40
Sanford, FL
—
738
803
—
—
738
803
1,541
337
1998
06/97
(f)
40
Valdosta, GA
—
391
806
—
—
391
806
1,197
305
1999
01/99
(f)
40
Pizza Hut:
Monroeville, AL
—
547
44
—
—
547
44
591
14
1976
12/01
40
Popeye's:
Snellville, GA
—
642
437
—
—
642
437
1,079
142
1995
12/01
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-38
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Randallstown, MD
—
483
609
—
—
483
609
1,092
21
1958
02/14
25
Power Center:
Midland, MI
—
1,085
1,635
220
—
1,085
1,598
2,683
377
2005
05/05
(g)
40
Big Flats, NY
—
2,248
7,159
1,258
—
2,248
5,075
7,323
1,206
2006
08/05
40
Harlingen, TX
—
247
807
—
—
247
583
830
129
2008
09/06
(g)
40
Harlingen, TX
—
749
1,238
195
—
749
1,043
1,792
238
2008
09/06
(g)
40
Woodstock, GA
—
261
701
—
—
261
516
777
95
1997
07/08
40
Premium Spas & Billiards:
Fairfax, VA
—
105
151
413
—
194
564
758
107
1995
12/95
40
Pull-A-Part:
Augusta, GA
—
1,414
—
1,449
—
1,414
1,449
2,863
273
2007
08/06
(m)
40
Birmingham, AL
—
1,165
2,090
—
—
1,165
2,090
3,255
438
1964
08/06
40
Charlotte, NC
—
2,913
1,724
—
—
2,908
1,724
4,632
361
2006
08/06
40
Conley, GA
—
1,686
1,387
—
—
1,686
1,387
3,073
290
1999
08/06
40
Harvey, LA
—
1,887
—
4,326
—
1,887
4,326
6,213
698
2008
08/06
(m)
40
Knoxville, TN
—
961
—
2,384
—
961
2,384
3,345
445
2007
08/06
(m)
40
Louisville, KY
—
3,206
1,532
—
—
3,206
1,532
4,738
321
2006
08/06
40
Nashville, TN
—
2,164
1,414
—
—
2,164
1,414
3,578
296
2006
08/06
40
Norcross, GA
—
1,831
1,040
—
—
1,831
1,040
2,871
218
1998
08/06
40
Cleveland, OH
—
4,556
—
2,096
—
4,556
2,096
6,652
373
2007
08/06
(m)
40
Lafayette, LA
—
1,036
—
2,226
—
1,036
2,226
3,262
392
2007
08/06
(m)
40
Montgomery, AL
—
934
—
2,013
—
934
2,013
2,947
358
2007
11/06
(m)
40
Jackson, MS
—
1,315
—
2,471
—
1,315
2,318
3,633
406
2008
12/06
(m)
40
Baton Rouge, LA
—
893
—
3,256
—
893
3,256
4,149
471
2009
01/07
(m)
40
Memphis, TN
—
1,779
—
2,964
—
1,779
2,964
4,743
491
2008
05/07
(m)
40
Mobile, AL
—
550
—
2,772
—
550
2,772
3,322
413
2009
06/07
(m)
40
Winston-Salem, NC
—
846
—
2,449
—
836
2,449
3,285
370
2009
08/07
(m)
40
Lithonia, GA
—
2,410
—
2,345
—
2,410
2,345
4,755
349
2009
08/07
(m)
40
Columbia, SC
—
935
—
2,178
—
935
2,178
3,113
324
2009
09/07
(m)
40
Akron, OH
—
1,065
—
1,869
—
1,065
1,869
2,934
239
2009
10/08
(m)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-39
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Quaker Steak & Lube:
Mentor, OH
—
841
2,452
—
—
841
2,452
3,293
50
2009
04/14
35
QuikTrip:
Alpharetta, GA
—
1,048
607
—
—
1,048
607
1,655
145
1996
06/05
40
Clive, IA
—
623
557
—
—
623
557
1,180
177
1994
06/05
30
Des Moines, IA
—
379
455
—
—
379
455
834
145
1990
06/05
30
Des Moines, IA
—
259
792
—
—
259
792
1,051
252
1996
06/05
30
Gainesville, GA
—
592
913
—
—
592
913
1,505
290
1989
06/05
30
Herculaneum, MO
—
856
1,613
—
—
856
1,613
2,469
513
1991
06/05
30
Johnston, IA
—
394
385
—
—
394
385
779
122
1991
06/05
30
Lee's Summit, MO
—
374
1,224
—
—
374
1,224
1,598
292
1999
06/05
40
Norcross, GA
—
948
294
—
—
948
294
1,242
93
1989
06/05
30
Norcross, GA
—
966
202
—
—
966
202
1,168
64
1993
06/05
30
Norcross, GA
—
844
297
—
—
839
297
1,136
94
1994
06/05
30
Olathe, KS
—
793
1,392
—
—
793
1,392
2,185
332
1999
06/05
40
Tulsa, OK
—
1,225
650
—
—
1,225
650
1,875
207
1990
06/05
30
Urbandale, IA
—
340
764
—
—
340
764
1,104
182
1993
06/05
40
Wichita, KS
—
127
543
—
—
127
543
670
173
1990
06/05
30
Wichita, KS
—
118
454
—
—
113
454
567
144
1989
06/05
30
Woodstock , GA
—
488
1,042
—
—
488
1,042
1,530
249
1997
06/05
40
Qwest Corporation Service Center:
Cedar Rapids, IA
—
184
629
—
—
184
629
813
300
1976
06/05
20
Decorah, IA
—
72
272
—
—
72
272
344
259
1974
06/05
10
Rabobank:
Chico, CA
—
346
—
—
—
346
(e)
346
(e)
(i)(e)
07/12
30
Raising Cane's:
Lancaster, OH
—
600
—
1,075
—
600
1,075
1,675
57
2012
01/08
(g)
40
Sulphur, LA
—
326
1,268
—
—
326
1,268
1,594
134
2009
04/11
35
Hurst, TX
—
763
—
1,309
—
763
1,309
2,072
105
2011
05/11
(m)
40
Fort Worth, TX
—
792
—
1,144
—
792
1,144
1,936
92
2011
06/11
(m)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-40
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Plano, TX
—
1,316
—
1,349
—
1,316
1,349
2,665
108
2011
06/11
(m)
40
Pearland, TX
—
774
—
1,255
—
774
1,255
2,029
98
2011
07/11
(m)
40
Addison, TX
—
869
—
1,343
—
869
1,343
2,212
94
2012
10/11
(m)
40
Houston, TX
—
737
—
1,163
—
737
1,163
1,900
84
2012
10/11
(m)
40
Euless, TX
—
1,222
—
1,376
—
1,226
1,376
2,602
105
2011
12/11
(m)
40
Moore, OK
—
762
—
1,153
—
762
1,153
1,915
78
2012
01/12
(m)
40
Rowlett, TX
—
814
—
1,398
—
814
1,398
2,212
86
2012
02/12
(m)
40
Keller, TX
—
833
—
1,265
—
833
1,265
2,098
70
2012
06/12
(m)
40
Omaha, NE
—
1,181
—
1,676
—
1,181
1,676
2,857
82
2013
08/12
(m)
40
McKinney, TX
—
1,443
—
1,255
—
1,443
1,255
2,698
54
2013
11/12
(m)
40
Tulsa, OK
—
1,006
—
1,508
—
1,006
1,508
2,514
64
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Broken Arrow, OK
—
1,267
1,285
—
—
1,267
1,285
2,552
44
2013
04/13
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
1,217
—
1,312
—
1,217
1,312
2,529
34
2013
06/13
(m)
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
988
—
1,268
—
988
1,268
2,256
38
2013
06/13
(m)
40
Owasso, OK
—
641
—
1,313
—
641
1,313
1,954
31
2014
09/13
(m)
40
Longview, TX
—
1,020
—
1,488
—
1,020
1,488
2,508
17
2014
02/14
(m)
40
Georgetown, TX
—
1,101
—
1,830
—
1,101
1,830
2,931
13
2014
05/14
(m)
40
Rallys:
Toledo, OH
—
126
320
—
—
126
320
446
186
1989
07/92
39
RBC Bank:
Altamonte Springs, FL
—
1,316
2,014
—
—
1,316
2,014
3,330
266
2007
05/10
35
Regal Theatre:
Bolingbrook, IL
—
2,937
3,032
1,500
—
2,937
4,532
7,469
751
1994
09/07
30
Reliable Life Insurance:
St. Louis, MO
—
1,519
10,074
1,466
—
1,519
11,540
13,059
2,637
1975
05/04
40
Rent-A-Center:
Cohoes, NY
—
64
348
242
—
64
590
654
101
1994
09/04
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-41
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Rite Aid:
Douglasville, GA
—
413
995
—
—
413
995
1,408
471
1996
01/96
40
Conyers, GA
—
575
999
—
—
575
999
1,574
438
1997
06/97
40
Riverdale, GA
—
1,089
1,707
—
—
1,089
1,707
2,796
727
1997
12/97
40
Warner Robins, GA
—
707
—
1,227
—
707
1,227
1,934
490
1999
03/98
(g)
40
Mobile, AL (n)
—
1,137
1,694
—
—
1,137
1,694
2,831
552
2000
12/01
40
Orange Beach, AL
—
1,410
1,996
—
—
1,410
1,996
3,406
651
2000
12/01
40
Norfolk, VA
—
2,742
1,797
—
—
2,742
1,797
4,539
578
2001
02/02
40
Thorndale, PA
—
2,261
2,472
—
—
2,261
2,472
4,733
796
2001
02/02
40
West Mifflin, PA
—
1,402
2,044
—
—
1,402
2,044
3,446
658
1999
02/02
40
Albany, NY
—
25
867
—
—
25
867
892
223
1994
09/04
40
Saratoga Springs, NY
—
762
591
30
—
762
621
1,383
156
1993
09/04
40
Monticello, NY
221
664
769
—
—
664
769
1,433
188
1996
03/05
40
Clinton Twp, MI
—
977
1,664
—
—
977
1,664
2,641
44
1998
03/14
30
Dowagiac, MI
—
409
1,609
—
—
409
1,609
2,018
42
1998
03/14
30
Rite Care Pharmacy:
Dallas, TX
—
2,407
2,299
320
—
2,407
2,618
5,025
553
1971
06/05
40
Road Ranger:
Springfield, IL
—
705
1,500
—
—
705
1,500
2,205
320
1997
06/06
40
Belvidere, IL
—
1,098
1,256
1,257
—
1,098
2,513
3,611
371
1997
06/06
40
Brazil, IN
—
2,199
907
—
—
2,199
907
3,106
194
1990
06/06
40
Cherry Valley, IL
—
1,409
1,897
—
—
1,409
1,897
3,306
405
1991
06/06
40
Cottage Grove, WI
—
2,175
1,733
—
—
2,175
1,733
3,908
370
1990
06/06
40
Decatur, IL
—
815
1,314
—
—
815
1,314
2,129
281
2002
06/06
40
Dekalb, IL
—
747
1,658
—
—
747
1,658
2,405
354
2000
06/06
40
Elk Run Heights, IA
—
1,538
2,470
—
—
1,538
2,470
4,008
527
1989
06/06
40
Lake Station, IN
—
3,172
1,112
—
—
3,172
1,112
4,284
237
1987
06/06
40
Mendota, IL
—
1,218
3,295
—
—
1,218
3,295
4,513
462
1996
06/06
40
Oakdale, WI
—
1,844
1,663
—
—
1,844
1,663
3,507
355
1998
06/06
40
Rockford, IL
—
623
1,331
—
—
623
1,331
1,954
284
2000
06/06
40
Rockford, IL
—
1,094
1,662
—
—
1,094
1,662
2,756
355
1996
06/06
40
Springfield, IL
—
1,795
1,863
—
—
2,211
1,863
4,074
448
1978
06/06
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-42
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Champaign, IL
—
3,241
2,008
—
—
3,241
2,008
5,249
395
2006
02/07
40
DeKalb, IL
—
505
1,503
—
—
505
1,503
2,008
296
2004
02/07
40
Fenton, MO
—
2,584
2,622
—
—
2,584
2,622
5,206
516
2007
02/07
40
Hampshire, IL
—
1,307
1,501
1,629
—
1,307
3,130
4,437
588
1988
02/07
(f)
40
Princeton, IL (n)
—
1,141
3,066
—
—
1,141
3,066
4,207
604
2003
02/07
40
South Beloit, IL
—
3,824
2,309
—
—
3,824
2,309
6,133
455
2002
02/07
40
Cedar Rapids, IA
—
1,025
984
—
—
1,025
984
2,009
192
1990
03/07
40
Marion, IA
—
737
1,071
—
—
737
1,071
1,808
209
1974
03/07
40
Okawville, IL
—
1,530
1,147
1,034
—
1,536
2,181
3,717
275
1997
08/07
40
Dubuque, IA
—
561
1,941
—
—
561
1,941
2,502
354
2000
09/07
40
Belvidere, IL
—
521
1,053
—
—
521
1,053
1,574
188
2008
09/07
(f)
40
South Beloit, IL
—
1,182
1,324
—
—
1,182
1,324
2,506
236
2008
09/07
(f)
40
Chicago, IL
—
1,350
6,450
—
—
1,350
6,450
7,800
634
1970
07/12
25
Robbins Diamonds:
Newark, DE
—
636
1,273
29
—
629
1,302
1,931
641
1994
12/94
40
Romancing the Range:
Anderson, SC (n)
—
140
815
—
—
140
815
955
11
1996
07/14
35
Ross Dress for Less:
Coral Gables, FL
—
1,782
1,661
19
—
1,782
1,680
3,462
733
1994
06/96
38
Lodi, CA
—
614
1,415
—
—
614
1,415
2,029
396
1984
03/99
40
Rue 21:
Lapeer, MI
—
126
645
—
—
126
629
755
116
2007
10/05
40
Sally Beauty Supply:
Lapeer, MI
—
33
167
—
—
33
163
196
30
2007
10/05
40
Salons by JC:
Buford, GA
—
539
1,421
—
—
539
1,421
1,960
370
2003
07/04
(g)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-43
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Saltgrass Steakhouse:
Beaumont, TX
—
558
—
1,317
—
901
1,317
2,218
181
1975
09/10
(m)
30
San Antonio, TX
—
1,280
—
853
—
1,280
853
2,133
67
2011
08/11
(m)
40
Cypress, TX
—
1,071
—
1,886
—
1,071
1,886
2,957
116
2012
03/12
(m)
40
Midland, TX
—
837
2,073
—
—
837
2,073
2,910
91
1998
01/13
35
Port Arthur, TX
—
890
—
2,049
—
890
2,049
2,939
49
2014
08/13
(m)
40
McAllen, TX
—
1,390
—
—
—
1,393
1,417
2,810
(q)
2007
12/13
(m)
(q)
College Station, TX
—
934
—
2,031
—
934
2,031
2,965
(q)
2014
04/14
(m)
(q)
Lewisville, TX
—
1,268
—
—
—
1,268
(e)
1,268
(e)
(e)
11/14
(m)
(e)
Waco, TX
—
730
—
—
—
730
(e)
730
(e)
(e)
12/14
(m)
(e)
Savers Thrift Superstore:
Fairview Heights, IL
—
1,258
2,623
246
—
1,258
2,869
4,127
614
1980
10/05
(g)
40
Schlotzsky's Deli:
Phoenix, AZ
—
706
315
—
—
706
315
1,021
103
1995
12/01
40
Scottsdale, AZ
—
717
311
—
—
717
311
1,028
101
1995
12/01
40
Season's 52:
Schaumburg, IL
—
2,065
1,311
—
—
2,065
(i)
2,065
(i)
(i)
12/01
(i)
Select Comfort:
Tucson, AZ
—
906
—
—
—
906
(e)
906
(e)
(e)
11/14
(m)
(e)
Shek's Chinese Express:
Eden Prairie, MN
—
65
261
—
—
65
261
326
83
1997
12/01
40
Shell:
Glendale, AZ
—
1,817
2,415
126
—
1,817
2,541
4,358
490
2001
05/08
40
Peoria, AZ
—
860
1,117
114
—
860
1,231
2,091
328
1987
05/08
30
Shop-a-Snak:
Bessemer, AL
—
564
742
—
—
564
742
1,306
160
2002
05/06
40
Chelsea, AL
—
391
628
—
—
391
628
1,019
135
1981
05/06
40
Jasper, AL (n)
—
551
747
—
—
551
747
1,298
161
1998
05/06
40
Birmingham, AL
—
446
672
—
—
446
672
1,118
145
1989
05/06
40
Birmingham, AL
—
439
704
—
—
439
704
1,143
152
1989
05/06
40
Birmingham, AL
—
490
769
—
—
490
769
1,259
166
1992
05/06
40
Birmingham, AL
—
361
744
—
—
361
744
1,105
160
1989
05/06
40
Homewood, AL
—
468
657
—
—
468
657
1,125
142
1990
05/06
40
Hoover, AL
—
713
865
—
—
713
865
1,578
186
1998
05/06
40
Hoover, AL
—
764
1,157
—
—
663
1,157
1,820
249
2005
05/06
40
Trussville, AL
—
272
542
—
—
272
542
814
117
1992
05/06
40
Tuscaloosa, AL
—
432
559
—
—
432
559
991
121
1991
05/06
40
Tuscaloosa, AL
—
386
733
—
—
386
733
1,119
158
1991
05/06
40
Tuscaloosa, AL
—
525
463
—
—
525
463
988
100
1991
05/06
40
Silverleaf Resorts:
Buford, GA
—
1,267
2,406
25
—
1,267
2,430
3,697
632
2004
07/04
40
Sonic Automotive:
Charlotte, NC
—
3,619
4,854
—
—
3,619
4,854
8,473
925
1996
05/07
40
Sparkling Image:
Bakersfield, CA
—
3,363
3,288
—
—
3,363
3,288
6,651
558
2002
03/08
40
Bakersfield, CA
—
3,346
6,016
—
—
3,346
6,016
9,362
1,164
1998
03/08
35
Bakersfield, CA
—
2,043
3,520
40
—
2,043
719
2,762
287
1988
03/08
30
Bakersfield, CA
—
3,664
3,709
11
—
3,664
3,721
7,385
721
1994
03/08
35
Bakersfield, CA
—
2,798
5,260
22
—
1,781
284
2,065
266
1997
03/08
35
Bakersfield, CA
—
2,564
4,465
2,178
—
2,564
6,643
9,207
1,331
1988
03/08
30
San Fernando, CA
—
6,630
2,706
47
—
6,630
2,753
9,383
625
1988
03/08
30
Ventura, CA
—
5,590
4,431
94
—
5,590
4,526
10,116
764
2001
03/08
40
Ventura, CA
—
6,253
4,560
207
—
6,253
4,767
11,020
914
1994
03/08
35
Spec's Liquor and Fine Foods:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
768
841
601
—
768
1,442
2,210
572
1967
11/93
40
Coffee City, TX
—
1,330
3,858
—
—
1,330
3,858
5,188
953
1996
02/05
40
Spencer’s Air Conditioning & Appliance:
Glendale, AZ
—
342
982
—
—
342
982
1,324
379
1999
12/98
(g)
40
Sports Authority:
Tampa, FL
—
2,128
1,522
—
—
2,128
1,522
3,650
704
1994
06/96
40
Sarasota, FL
—
1,428
1,703
—
—
1,428
1,703
3,131
465
1988
09/97
40
Memphis, TN
—
820
—
2,598
—
820
2,598
3,418
1,046
1998
12/97
(g)
40
Woodbridge, NJ
—
3,750
5,983
—
—
3,750
5,983
9,733
1,789
1994
01/03
40
Staples:
Memphis, TN
—
931
2,210
—
—
931
2,210
3,141
55
2011
02/14
35
Starplex Theatre:
Southington, CT
—
1,346
—
3,662
—
1,346
3,662
5,008
76
1993
05/14
(m)
30
Steak N Shake:
Munhall, PA
—
688
727
—
—
688
727
1,415
13
2002
07/14
25
South Bend, IN
—
447
1,238
—
—
447
1,238
1,685
19
2004
07/14
30
Sterling Collision:
Lombard, IL
—
622
1,714
—
—
622
1,714
2,336
140
1997
12/12
25
Stone Mountain Chevrolet:
Lilburn, GA
—
3,027
4,685
—
—
3,027
4,685
7,712
1,215
2004
08/04
40
Stop N Go:
Grand Prairie, TX
—
421
685
—
—
421
685
1,106
223
1986
12/01
40
Stripes:
Laredo, TX
—
841
739
—
—
841
739
1,580
167
2001
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,015
1,308
—
—
1,015
1,308
2,323
296
2003
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,392
1,444
—
—
1,392
1,444
2,836
326
2005
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
933
699
—
—
933
699
1,632
158
1999
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,843
1,419
—
—
1,843
1,419
3,262
321
2000
12/05
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-44
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Brownsville, TX
—
2,033
1,288
—
—
2,033
1,288
3,321
291
1995
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
2,530
1,125
—
—
2,530
1,125
3,655
254
1990
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,039
1,145
—
—
1,039
1,145
2,184
259
2004
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
2,417
1,828
—
—
2,417
1,828
4,245
413
2000
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,279
1,015
—
—
1,279
1,015
2,294
229
1990
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,182
1,105
—
—
1,182
1,105
2,287
250
2000
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
2,915
1,800
—
—
2,915
1,800
4,715
407
2000
12/05
40
Corpus Christi, TX
—
703
1,037
—
—
703
1,037
1,740
234
1986
12/05
40
Corpus Christi, TX
—
1,308
2,151
—
—
1,308
2,151
3,459
486
1995
12/05
40
Corpus Christi, TX
—
1,400
1,531
—
—
1,400
1,531
2,931
346
1984
12/05
40
Corpus Christi, TX
—
1,385
1,419
—
—
1,385
1,419
2,804
321
1982
12/05
40
Corpus Christi, TX
—
853
1,416
—
—
853
1,416
2,269
320
2005
12/05
40
Donna, TX
—
1,004
1,127
—
—
1,004
1,127
2,131
255
1995
12/05
40
Edinburg, TX
—
970
1,286
—
—
970
1,286
2,256
291
2003
12/05
40
Edinburg, TX
—
1,317
1,624
—
—
1,317
1,624
2,941
367
1999
12/05
40
Falfurias, TX
—
4,244
4,458
—
—
4,213
4,458
8,671
1,008
2002
12/05
40
Freer, TX
—
1,151
1,158
—
—
1,151
1,158
2,309
262
1984
12/05
40
George West, TX
—
1,243
695
—
—
1,243
695
1,938
157
1996
12/05
40
Harlingen, TX
—
755
601
—
—
755
601
1,356
136
1987
12/05
40
Harlingen, TX
—
906
953
—
—
906
953
1,859
215
1991
12/05
40
Harlingen, TX
—
754
1,152
—
—
754
1,152
1,906
260
1999
12/05
40
La Feria, TX
—
900
1,347
—
—
900
1,347
2,247
304
1988
12/05
40
Laredo, TX
—
736
670
—
—
736
670
1,406
152
1984
12/05
40
Laredo, TX
—
1,553
1,775
—
—
1,553
1,775
3,328
401
2000
12/05
40
Laredo, TX
—
1,495
1,400
—
—
1,495
1,400
2,895
317
1993
12/05
40
Laredo, TX
—
675
533
—
—
675
533
1,208
120
1993
12/05
40
Laredo, TX
—
459
460
—
—
459
460
919
104
1983
12/05
40
Lawton, OK
—
697
964
—
—
649
964
1,613
218
1984
12/05
40
Los Indios, TX
—
1,387
1,457
—
—
1,387
1,457
2,844
329
2005
12/05
40
McAllen, TX
—
987
893
—
—
987
893
1,880
202
1999
12/05
40
McAllen, TX
—
975
1,030
—
—
975
1,030
2,005
233
2003
12/05
40
Mission, TX
—
880
1,101
—
—
880
1,101
1,981
249
1999
12/05
40
Mission, TX
—
1,125
1,213
—
—
1,125
1,213
2,338
274
2003
12/05
40
Olmito, TX
—
3,688
2,880
—
—
3,688
2,880
6,568
651
2002
12/05
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-45
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Pharr, TX
—
2,426
1,881
—
—
2,426
1,881
4,307
425
2003
12/05
40
Pharr, TX
—
784
805
—
—
784
805
1,589
182
2000
12/05
40
Pharr, TX
—
982
1,178
—
—
982
1,178
2,160
266
1988
12/05
40
Port Isabel, TX
—
2,062
1,299
—
—
2,062
1,299
3,361
294
1994
12/05
40
Portland, TX
—
656
915
—
—
656
915
1,571
207
1983
12/05
40
Progreso, TX
—
1,769
1,811
—
—
1,769
1,811
3,580
409
1999
12/05
40
Riviera, TX
—
2,351
2,158
—
—
2,351
2,158
4,509
488
2005
12/05
40
San Benito, TX
—
791
1,857
—
—
791
1,857
2,648
420
1994
12/05
40
San Benito, TX
—
1,103
1,586
—
—
1,103
1,586
2,689
359
2005
12/05
40
San Juan, TX
—
1,424
1,546
—
—
1,424
1,546
2,970
349
2004
12/05
40
San Juan, TX
—
1,124
1,172
—
—
1,124
1,172
2,296
265
1996
12/05
40
South Padre Island, TX
—
1,367
1,389
—
—
1,367
1,389
2,756
314
1988
12/05
40
Wichita Falls, TX
—
440
751
—
—
440
751
1,191
170
1984
12/05
40
Wichita Falls, TX
—
905
1,351
—
—
905
1,351
2,256
305
2000
12/05
40
Wichita Falls, TX
—
484
828
—
—
484
828
1,312
187
1983
12/05
40
Palmview, TX
—
835
1,372
—
—
835
1,372
2,207
282
2005
10/06
40
Harlingen, TX
—
638
1,807
—
—
638
1,807
2,445
363
2006
12/06
40
Rio Grande City, TX
—
1,871
1,612
—
—
1,871
1,612
3,483
324
2006
12/06
40
San Juan, TX
—
816
1,434
—
—
816
1,434
2,250
288
2006
12/06
40
Zapata, TX
—
1,333
1,773
—
—
1,333
1,773
3,106
356
2006
12/06
40
Orange Grove, TX
—
1,767
1,838
—
—
1,767
1,838
3,605
354
2007
04/07
40
Harlingen, TX
—
408
826
—
—
408
826
1,234
196
1982
11/07
30
Laredo, TX
—
584
958
—
—
584
958
1,542
228
1981
11/07
30
Laredo, TX
—
448
734
—
—
448
734
1,182
174
1981
11/07
30
Laredo, TX
—
698
1,169
—
—
698
1,169
1,867
278
1981
11/07
30
Laredo, TX
—
348
1,168
—
—
348
1,168
1,516
277
1983
11/07
30
Laredo, TX
—
468
728
—
—
468
728
1,196
173
1973
11/07
30
San Benito, TX
—
420
1,135
—
—
420
1,135
1,555
270
1985
11/07
30
Del Rio, TX
—
1,565
758
—
—
1,565
758
2,323
135
1996
11/07
40
Kerrville, TX
—
640
1,616
—
—
640
1,616
2,256
288
1996
11/07
40
Monahans, TX
—
2,628
2,973
—
—
2,628
2,973
5,601
530
1996
11/07
40
Odessa, TX
—
2,633
3,199
—
—
2,633
3,199
5,832
570
2006
11/07
40
San Angelo, TX
—
194
471
—
—
194
471
665
84
1998
11/07
40
Pharr, TX
—
573
1,229
—
—
573
1,229
1,802
216
2000
12/07
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-46
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Harlingen, TX
—
329
935
—
—
329
935
1,264
217
1980
01/08
30
Harlingen, TX
—
277
808
—
—
277
808
1,085
187
1983
01/08
30
Laredo, TX
—
325
816
—
—
325
816
1,141
189
1983
01/08
30
McAllen, TX
—
643
1,776
—
—
643
1,776
2,419
412
1980
01/08
30
Port Isabel, TX
—
299
855
—
—
299
855
1,154
198
1983
01/08
30
Brownsville, TX
—
843
1,429
—
—
843
1,429
2,272
237
2007
05/08
40
Edinburg, TX
—
834
1,787
—
—
834
1,787
2,621
296
2007
05/08
40
La Villa, TX
—
710
2,166
—
—
710
2,166
2,876
359
2007
05/08
40
Laredo, TX
—
1,183
1,934
—
—
1,183
1,934
3,117
320
2007
05/08
40
Laredo, TX
—
879
1,593
—
—
879
1,593
2,472
264
2007
05/08
40
McAllen, TX
—
1,270
2,383
—
—
1,270
2,383
3,653
526
1986
05/08
30
Houston, TX (n)
—
696
1,458
—
—
696
1,458
2,154
220
2008
12/08
40
Lubbock, TX
—
671
1,612
—
—
671
1,612
2,283
244
2007
12/08
40
Studio Nail and Spa:
Cohoes, NY
—
27
145
59
—
27
204
231
44
1994
09/04
40
Subway:
Eden Prairie, MN
—
54
150
67
—
54
218
272
69
1997
12/01
40
Albany, NY
—
3
67
—
—
3
67
70
17
1992
09/04
40
Cohoes, NY
—
21
116
8
—
21
123
144
34
1994
09/04
40
Sullivan's Steakhouse:
Lincolnshire, IL
—
862
1,574
—
—
862
1,574
2,436
186
1999
01/12
25
Sunbelt Rentals:
Dayton, OH
—
391
1,223
—
—
391
1,223
1,614
95
2008
04/12
35
Shepherdsville, KY
—
516
1,577
—
—
516
1,577
2,093
122
2009
04/12
35
Sunoco:
Arnold, MD
—
417
581
—
—
417
581
998
33
1993
04/13
30
Baltimore, MD
—
271
1,482
—
—
271
1,482
1,753
101
1968
04/13
25
Baltimore, MD
—
310
1,686
—
—
310
1,686
1,996
82
2004
04/13
35
Baltimore, MD
—
620
1,279
—
—
620
1,279
1,899
73
1989
04/13
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-47
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Baltimore, MD
—
368
1,647
—
—
368
1,647
2,015
94
1996
04/13
30
Baltimore, MD
—
523
2,809
—
—
523
2,809
3,332
192
1982
04/13
25
Baltimore, MD
—
542
2,054
—
—
542
2,054
2,596
117
1998
04/13
30
Baltimore, MD
—
455
2,122
—
—
455
2,122
2,577
145
1980
04/13
25
Bel Air, MD
—
1,376
620
—
—
1,376
620
1,996
35
1994
04/13
30
Bethesda, MD
—
1,414
1,347
—
—
1,414
1,347
2,761
92
1971
04/13
25
Centreville, VA
—
1,753
697
—
—
1,753
697
2,450
40
1994
04/13
30
Chantilly, VA
—
1,472
1,831
—
—
1,472
1,831
3,303
125
1966
04/13
25
Dale City, VA
—
639
2,461
—
—
639
2,461
3,100
140
1992
04/13
30
Dumfries, VA
—
387
2,364
—
—
387
2,364
2,751
135
1999
04/13
30
Edgewood, MD
—
823
2,073
—
—
823
2,073
2,896
142
1985
04/13
25
Frederick, MD
—
940
1,860
—
—
940
1,860
2,800
106
1996
04/13
30
Gaithersburg, MD
—
1,027
2,073
—
—
1,027
2,073
3,100
142
1982
04/13
25
Glen Burnie, MD
—
804
1,647
—
—
804
1,647
2,451
94
1994
04/13
30
Herndon, VA
—
707
1,792
—
—
707
1,792
2,499
102
1989
04/13
30
Joppa, MD
—
862
174
—
—
862
174
1,036
12
1987
04/13
25
Manassas, VA
—
1,230
1,521
—
—
1,230
1,521
2,751
87
1991
04/13
30
Manassas, VA
—
746
1,434
—
—
746
1,434
2,180
82
1993
04/13
30
Odenton, MD
—
668
2,780
—
—
668
2,780
3,448
158
2000
04/13
30
Owings Mills, MD
—
1,337
911
—
—
1,337
911
2,248
52
1994
04/13
30
Parkton, MD
—
397
2,151
—
—
397
2,151
2,548
122
1993
04/13
30
Pasadena, MD
—
407
1,492
—
—
407
1,492
1,899
85
1989
04/13
30
Pasadena, MD
—
591
2,509
—
—
591
2,509
3,100
143
1997
04/13
30
Perryville, MD
—
601
3,778
—
—
601
3,778
4,379
215
1990
04/13
30
Randallstown, MD
—
746
1,715
—
—
746
1,715
2,461
98
1995
04/13
30
Reisterstown, MD
—
649
2,354
—
—
649
2,354
3,003
134
1995
04/13
30
Rockville, MD
—
1,996
2,054
—
—
1,996
2,054
4,050
140
1971
04/13
25
Severn, MD
—
765
3,139
—
—
765
3,139
3,904
179
1987
04/13
30
Sterling, VA
—
1,540
2,461
—
—
1,540
2,461
4,001
140
1998
04/13
30
Sterling, VA
—
1,356
1,095
—
—
1,356
1,095
2,451
62
1997
04/13
30
Timonium, MD
—
1,356
1,598
—
—
1,356
1,598
2,954
109
1981
04/13
25
Towson, MD
—
630
2,771
—
—
630
2,771
3,401
189
1988
04/13
25
Warrenton, VA
—
1,802
2,703
—
—
1,802
2,703
4,505
154
1994
04/13
30
Woodbridge, VA
—
678
2,664
—
—
678
2,664
3,342
182
1988
04/13
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-48
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Sunshine Energy:
Kansas City, MO
—
517
720
—
—
517
720
1,237
157
1993
07/09
25
Neosho, MO
—
352
775
—
—
352
754
1,106
148
1992
07/09
18
SunTrust:
Albany, GA
—
287
890
—
—
287
890
1,177
91
1990
06/13
15
Alexandria, VA
—
2,735
732
—
—
2,735
732
3,467
75
1969
06/13
15
Alpharetta, GA
—
1,625
1,366
—
—
1,625
1,366
2,991
105
1991
06/13
20
Alpharetta, GA
—
1,056
1,425
—
—
1,056
1,425
2,481
73
2005
06/13
30
Arlington, VA
—
1,998
638
—
—
1,998
638
2,636
49
1993
06/13
20
Atlanta, GA
—
296
748
—
—
296
748
1,044
77
1964
06/13
15
Atlanta, GA
—
2,130
1,623
—
—
2,130
1,623
3,753
125
1976
06/13
20
Augusta, GA
—
472
443
—
—
472
443
915
137
1970
06/13
5
Augusta, GA
—
865
872
—
—
865
872
1,737
134
1972
06/13
10
Augusta, GA
—
352
397
—
—
352
397
749
122
1949
06/13
5
Avon Park, FL
—
360
1,564
—
—
360
1,564
1,924
80
1983
06/13
30
Bartow, FL
—
218
769
—
—
218
769
987
47
1980
06/13
25
Beaverdam, VA
—
230
309
—
—
230
309
539
95
1964
06/13
5
Belleview, FL
—
226
1,085
—
—
226
1,085
1,311
56
1979
06/13
30
Beverly Hills, FL
—
376
1,414
—
—
376
1,414
1,790
73
1989
06/13
30
Black Mountain, NC
—
780
655
—
—
780
655
1,435
202
1943
06/13
5
Bladensburg, MD
—
1,528
1,538
—
—
1,528
1,538
3,066
79
1946
06/13
30
Boca Raton, FL
—
1,663
654
—
—
1,663
654
2,317
101
1977
06/13
10
Bradenton, FL
—
437
1,251
—
—
429
1,251
1,680
64
1980
06/13
30
Brunswick, GA
—
158
2,169
—
—
158
2,169
2,327
669
1957
06/13
5
Butner, NC
—
344
606
—
—
344
606
950
47
1957
06/13
20
Cape Coral, FL
—
1,065
1,032
—
—
1,065
1,032
2,097
80
1980
06/13
20
Cary, NC
—
616
826
—
—
616
826
1,442
64
1987
06/13
20
Chapel Hill, NC
—
323
541
—
—
323
541
864
56
1963
06/13
15
Chattanooga, TN
—
496
824
—
—
496
824
1,320
254
1948
06/13
5
Chattanooga, TN
—
308
652
—
—
308
652
960
201
1972
06/13
5
Chattanooga, TN
—
260
374
—
—
260
374
634
115
1981
06/13
5
Chattanooga, TN
—
336
341
—
—
336
341
677
105
1974
06/13
5
Chestertown, MD
—
856
290
—
—
856
290
1,146
89
1974
06/13
5
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-49
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Clearwater, FL
—
433
530
—
—
433
530
963
54
1983
06/13
15
Conyers, GA
—
366
501
—
—
366
501
867
77
1986
06/13
10
Crystal River, FL
—
430
2,971
—
—
430
2,971
3,401
131
1983
06/13
35
Daytona Beach Shores, FL
—
318
720
—
—
318
720
1,038
44
1982
06/13
25
Deland, FL
—
270
1,296
—
—
270
1,296
1,566
67
1993
06/13
30
Denton, NC
—
472
783
—
—
472
783
1,255
80
1969
06/13
15
Doral, FL
—
1,912
1,100
—
—
1,912
1,100
3,012
85
1988
06/13
20
Douglas, GA
—
354
168
—
—
354
168
522
52
1972
06/13
5
Duluth, GA
—
851
845
—
—
851
845
1,696
65
1992
06/13
20
Edgewater, FL
—
419
1,417
—
—
419
1,417
1,836
73
1986
06/13
30
Erwin, NC
—
380
89
—
—
380
89
469
27
1955
06/13
5
Flagler Beach, FL
—
366
1,313
—
—
366
1,313
1,679
58
1993
06/13
35
Fort Myers, FL
—
543
758
—
—
543
758
1,301
47
1986
06/13
25
Fort Myers, FL
—
814
684
—
—
814
684
1,498
70
1986
06/13
15
Franklin, VA
—
103
911
—
—
103
911
1,014
94
1967
06/13
15
Gainesville, GA
—
406
1,830
—
—
406
1,830
2,236
564
1966
06/13
5
Greenacres City, FL
—
1,395
1,533
—
—
1,395
1,533
2,928
79
1988
06/13
30
Greensboro, NC
—
516
394
—
—
516
394
910
121
1980
06/13
5
Gulf Breeze, FL
—
1,021
1,382
—
—
1,021
1,382
2,403
213
1960
06/13
10
Haines City, FL
—
405
1,241
—
—
405
1,241
1,646
64
1989
06/13
30
Hallandale Beach, FL
—
1,735
2,343
—
—
1,735
2,343
4,078
181
1971
06/13
20
Harrisonburg, VA
—
245
438
—
—
245
438
683
135
1968
06/13
5
Hialeah, FL
—
2,578
1,149
—
—
2,578
1,149
3,727
177
1978
06/13
10
Holly Hill, FL
—
509
699
—
—
509
699
1,208
216
1963
06/13
5
Homosassa, FL
—
344
825
—
—
344
825
1,169
51
1985
06/13
25
Hudson, NC
—
220
207
—
—
220
207
427
16
1994
06/13
20
Huntersville, NC
—
177
830
—
—
177
830
1,007
51
1998
06/13
25
Inverness, FL
—
471
755
—
—
471
755
1,226
78
1984
06/13
15
Jacksonville, FL
—
674
821
—
—
674
821
1,495
51
1987
06/13
25
Jacksonville, FL
—
938
926
—
—
938
926
1,864
71
1979
06/13
20
Jonesboro, GA
—
591
1,185
—
—
591
1,185
1,776
365
1965
06/13
5
Jonesborough, TN
—
95
285
—
—
95
285
380
88
1974
06/13
5
Jupiter, FL
—
1,035
1,327
—
—
1,035
1,327
2,362
58
1998
06/13
35
Kannapolis, NC
—
850
834
—
—
850
834
1,684
257
1906
06/13
5
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-50
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Kernersville, NC
—
284
708
—
—
284
708
992
73
1990
06/13
15
Lady Lake, FL
—
388
1,537
—
—
388
1,537
1,925
79
1996
06/13
30
Lady Lake, FL
—
340
1,355
—
—
340
1,355
1,695
70
1996
06/13
30
Lake City, TN
—
326
514
—
—
326
514
840
159
1958
06/13
5
Lake Placid, FL
—
289
1,402
—
—
289
1,402
1,691
72
1988
06/13
30
Largo, FL
—
258
643
—
—
258
643
901
50
1979
06/13
20
Lawrenceburg, TN
—
205
413
—
—
205
413
618
127
1975
06/13
5
Lawrenceville, GA
—
657
1,764
—
—
657
1,764
2,421
272
1985
06/13
10
Lightfoot, VA
—
177
512
—
—
177
512
689
79
1973
06/13
10
Lynn Haven, FL
—
797
865
—
—
797
865
1,662
133
1974
06/13
10
Macon, GA
—
207
392
—
—
207
392
599
40
1980
06/13
15
Madison Heights, VA
—
215
379
—
—
215
379
594
117
1973
06/13
5
Manassas, VA
—
1,765
1,714
—
—
1,765
1,714
3,479
132
1967
06/13
20
Marietta, GA
—
617
714
—
—
617
714
1,331
110
1974
06/13
10
Mechanicsville, VA
—
343
493
—
—
343
493
836
152
1965
06/13
5
Mocksville, NC
—
189
434
—
—
189
434
623
134
1967
06/13
5
Monroe, NC
—
586
353
—
—
586
353
939
109
1981
06/13
5
Murfreesboro, TN
—
276
554
—
—
276
554
830
57
1989
06/13
15
N Miami Beach, FL
—
915
497
—
—
915
497
1,412
51
1986
06/13
15
Nashville, TN
—
679
394
—
—
679
394
1,073
122
1949
06/13
5
Nashville, TN
—
438
1,295
—
—
438
1,295
1,733
67
1994
06/13
30
Nashville, TN
—
627
639
—
—
627
639
1,266
98
1972
06/13
10
New Port Richey, FL
—
463
1,178
—
—
463
1,178
1,641
73
1998
06/13
25
Norcross, GA
—
789
663
—
—
789
663
1,452
68
1986
06/13
15
Norwood, NC
—
519
410
—
—
519
410
929
126
1946
06/13
5
Orlando, FL
—
637
1,415
—
—
637
1,415
2,052
87
1999
06/13
25
Orlando, FL
—
801
1,135
—
—
801
1,135
1,936
88
1993
06/13
20
Palm Harbor, FL
—
532
384
—
—
532
384
916
59
1983
06/13
10
Palm Harbor, FL
—
836
1,139
—
—
836
1,139
1,975
88
1984
06/13
20
Punta Gorda, FL (n)
—
1,483
1,330
—
—
1,483
1,330
2,813
103
1972
06/13
20
Radford, VA
—
221
326
—
—
221
326
547
100
1964
06/13
5
Raleigh, NC
—
798
1,286
—
—
798
1,286
2,084
99
1974
06/13
20
Richmond, VA
—
263
563
—
—
263
563
826
87
1981
06/13
10
Richmond, VA
—
398
673
—
—
398
673
1,071
207
1972
06/13
5
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-51
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Richmond, VA
—
283
245
—
—
283
245
528
76
1973
06/13
5
Roanoke, VA
—
264
256
—
—
264
256
520
79
1973
06/13
5
Roanoke, VA
—
103
360
—
—
103
360
463
56
1957
06/13
10
Roxboro, NC
—
452
918
—
—
452
918
1,370
94
1983
06/13
15
Sebastian, FL
—
438
856
—
—
438
856
1,294
66
1987
06/13
20
Sebring, FL
—
326
920
—
—
326
920
1,246
57
1985
06/13
25
South Boston, VA
—
221
1,441
—
—
221
1,441
1,662
111
1975
06/13
20
Spartanburg, SC
—
435
372
—
—
435
372
807
57
1921
06/13
10
Spotsylvania, VA
—
1,398
1,158
—
—
1,398
1,158
2,556
51
1964
06/13
35
Spring Hill, FL
—
460
1,102
—
—
460
1,102
1,562
340
1973
06/13
5
Spring Hill, FL
—
631
1,950
—
—
631
1,950
2,581
100
1988
06/13
30
St. Petersburg, FL
—
207
1,150
—
—
207
1,150
1,357
59
1974
06/13
30
Stuart, FL (n)
—
1,143
2,570
—
—
1,143
2,570
3,713
132
1985
06/13
30
Sun City Center, FL (n)
—
568
3,671
—
—
568
3,671
4,239
162
1971
06/13
35
Tamarac, FL
—
966
1,115
—
—
966
1,115
2,081
172
1972
06/13
10
Tucker, GA
—
395
1,208
—
—
395
1,208
1,603
93
1971
06/13
20
Valrico, FL
—
178
870
—
—
178
870
1,048
45
1981
06/13
30
Virginia Beach, VA
—
326
366
—
—
326
366
692
56
1985
06/13
10
Warner Robins, GA
—
905
1,276
—
—
905
1,276
2,181
197
1973
06/13
10
Washington, DC
—
2,095
945
—
—
2,095
945
3,040
49
1950
06/13
30
Wildwood, FL
—
308
953
—
—
308
953
1,261
59
1978
06/13
25
Youngsville, NC
—
237
165
—
—
237
165
402
51
1946
06/13
5
Zephyrhills, FL
—
345
3,112
—
—
345
3,112
3,457
320
1972
06/13
15
Zephyrhills, FL
—
267
1,301
—
—
267
1,301
1,568
67
1984
06/13
30
Superior Petroleum:
Midway, PA
—
311
708
—
—
311
708
1,019
212
1990
01/06
30
Supervalu:
Huntington, WV
—
1,254
761
—
—
1,254
761
2,015
340
1971
02/97
40
Maple Heights, OH
—
1,035
2,874
—
—
1,035
2,874
3,909
1,285
1985
02/97
40
Susser HQ:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
630
3,131
—
—
630
3,131
3,761
1,236
1982
03/99
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-52
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Swansea Quick Cash:
Swansea, IL
—
46
132
—
—
46
132
178
65
1997
12/01
40
Sweet Berries Cafe:
Sherman, TX
—
233
126
24
—
233
150
383
60
1969
09/06
20
Taco Bell:
Ocala, FL
—
275
755
—
—
275
755
1,030
246
2001
12/01
40
Ormond Beach, FL
—
632
526
—
—
632
526
1,158
171
2001
12/01
40
Phoenix, AZ
—
594
283
—
—
594
283
877
92
1995
12/01
40
Bedford, IN
—
797
937
—
—
797
937
1,734
202
1989
05/06
40
Columbus, IN
—
690
1,213
—
—
690
1,213
1,903
261
2005
05/06
40
Columbus, IN
—
1,257
2,055
—
—
1,257
2,055
3,312
443
1990
05/06
40
Evansville, IN
—
524
1,815
—
—
524
1,815
2,339
391
2005
05/06
40
Evansville, IN
—
308
1,301
—
—
308
1,301
1,609
280
2000
05/06
40
Evansville, IN
—
221
828
—
—
221
828
1,049
179
2003
05/06
40
Fishers, IN
—
990
486
—
—
990
486
1,476
105
1998
05/06
40
Greensburg, IN
—
648
1,079
—
—
648
1,079
1,727
233
1998
05/06
40
Indianapolis, IN
—
1,032
1,650
—
—
1,032
1,650
2,682
356
2004
05/06
40
Indianapolis, IN
—
547
703
—
—
547
703
1,250
152
2004
05/06
40
Madisonville, KY
—
682
1,193
—
—
682
1,193
1,875
257
1999
05/06
40
Ownesboro, KY
—
639
1,326
—
—
639
1,326
1,965
286
2005
05/06
40
Shelbyville, IN
—
670
1,756
—
—
670
1,756
2,426
379
1998
05/06
40
Speedway, IN
—
408
1,426
—
—
408
1,426
1,834
308
2003
05/06
40
Terre Haute, IN
—
1,037
1,656
—
—
1,037
1,656
2,693
357
2003
05/06
40
Terre Haute, IN
—
1,314
2,249
—
—
1,314
2,249
3,563
485
2003
05/06
40
Vincennes, IN
—
502
880
—
—
502
880
1,382
190
2004
05/06
40
Anderson, SC
—
176
436
—
—
176
436
612
59
2000
12/10
30
Anderson, SC
—
273
820
—
—
273
820
1,093
132
1989
12/10
25
Asheville, NC
—
252
483
—
—
252
483
735
78
1993
12/10
25
Asheville, NC
—
408
732
—
—
408
732
1,140
118
1992
12/10
25
Black Mountain, NC
—
149
313
—
—
149
313
462
51
1992
12/10
25
Blue Ridge, GA
—
276
553
—
—
276
553
829
89
1992
12/10
25
Cedartown, GA
—
353
890
—
—
353
890
1,243
144
1990
12/10
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-53
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Duncan, SC
—
280
483
—
—
280
483
763
65
1999
12/10
30
Easley, SC (n)
—
444
818
—
—
444
818
1,262
132
1991
12/10
25
Fort Payne, AL
—
362
533
—
—
362
533
895
86
1989
12/10
25
Franklin, NC
—
472
687
—
—
472
687
1,159
111
1992
12/10
25
Gaffney, SC
—
388
940
—
—
388
940
1,328
127
1998
12/10
30
Greenville, SC
—
169
330
—
—
169
330
499
53
1990
12/10
25
Greenville, SC
—
414
810
—
—
414
810
1,224
109
1995
12/10
30
Hendersonville, NC
—
569
1,163
—
—
569
1,163
1,732
188
1988
12/10
25
Inman, SC
—
223
502
—
—
223
502
725
68
1999
12/10
30
Lavonia, GA
—
122
359
—
—
122
359
481
48
1999
12/10
30
Madison, AL
—
498
886
—
—
498
886
1,384
143
1985
12/10
25
Oneonta, AL
—
362
881
—
—
362
881
1,243
142
1992
12/10
25
Piedmont, SC
—
249
702
—
—
249
702
951
95
2000
12/10
30
Pisgah Forest, NC
—
260
672
—
—
260
672
932
91
1998
12/10
30
Rainsville, AL
—
411
1,077
—
—
411
1,077
1,488
145
1998
12/10
30
Seneca, SC
—
304
807
—
—
304
807
1,111
130
1993
12/10
25
Simpsonville, SC
—
635
1,022
—
—
635
1,022
1,657
165
1991
12/10
25
Spartanburg, SC
—
239
496
—
—
239
496
735
67
1992
12/10
30
Spartanburg, SC
—
492
949
—
—
492
949
1,441
128
1993
12/10
30
Sylva, NC
—
580
786
—
—
580
786
1,366
106
1994
12/10
30
Toccoa, GA
—
201
600
—
—
201
600
801
81
1993
12/10
30
Anderson, IN
—
313
1,338
—
—
313
1,338
1,651
78
2008
12/12
35
Bloomington, IN
—
275
1,026
—
—
275
1,026
1,301
84
1988
12/12
25
Bloomington, IN
—
332
1,234
—
—
332
1,234
1,566
72
2009
12/12
35
Carmel, IN
—
360
1,546
—
—
360
1,546
1,906
105
1994
12/12
30
Daleville, IN
—
209
893
—
—
209
893
1,102
61
1995
12/12
30
Edinburgh, IN
—
313
1,338
—
—
313
1,338
1,651
78
2007
12/12
35
Evansville, IN
—
209
1,092
—
—
209
1,092
1,301
64
2008
12/12
35
Indianapolis, IN
—
256
1,102
—
—
256
1,102
1,358
64
2008
12/12
35
Indianapolis, IN
—
209
799
—
—
209
799
1,008
54
1994
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
351
1,452
—
—
351
1,452
1,803
99
2005
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
247
931
—
—
247
931
1,178
63
1995
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
285
1,225
—
—
285
1,225
1,510
71
2008
12/12
35
Indianapolis, IN
—
304
1,206
—
—
304
1,206
1,510
70
2010
12/12
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-54
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Jasper, IN
—
200
960
—
—
200
960
1,160
65
1992
12/12
30
New Castle, IN
—
427
1,830
—
—
427
1,830
2,257
125
2006
12/12
30
Owensboro, KY
—
436
1,119
—
—
436
1,119
1,555
65
2010
12/12
35
Connersville, IN
—
136
1,280
—
—
136
1,280
1,416
62
1991
07/13
30
Linton, IN
—
155
1,203
—
—
155
1,203
1,358
58
1996
07/13
30
Owensboro, KY
—
136
1,549
—
—
136
1,549
1,685
75
1998
07/13
30
Arnold, MO
—
436
698
—
—
436
698
1,134
38
1991
08/13
25
Collinsville, IL
—
368
1,713
—
—
368
1,713
2,081
94
1993
08/13
25
East Alton, IL
—
271
1,008
—
—
271
1,008
1,279
46
1991
08/13
30
Edwardsville, IL
—
310
1,549
—
—
310
1,549
1,859
71
1987
08/13
30
Eureka, MO
—
466
466
—
—
466
466
932
26
1984
08/13
25
Granite City, IL
—
707
852
—
—
707
852
1,559
33
2006
08/13
35
Hazelwood, MO
—
513
1,470
—
—
513
1,470
1,983
67
1991
08/13
30
Maryland Heights, MO
—
407
862
—
—
407
862
1,269
40
1991
08/13
30
O'Fallon, MO
—
445
1,770
—
—
445
1,770
2,215
81
1985
08/13
30
O'Fallon, MO
—
580
1,403
—
—
580
1,403
1,983
55
2003
08/13
35
St. Charles, MO
—
581
872
—
—
581
872
1,453
40
2000
08/13
30
St. Louis, MO
—
252
1,047
—
—
252
1,047
1,299
58
1981
08/13
25
St. Louis, MO
—
465
1,171
—
—
465
1,171
1,636
46
2009
08/13
35
St. Louis, MO
—
252
785
—
—
252
785
1,037
36
1990
08/13
30
Taverna Greek Grill:
Fort Collins, CO
—
390
895
—
—
390
895
1,285
116
1995
02/11
30
Texas Roadhouse:
Grand Junction, CO
—
584
920
—
—
584
920
1,504
300
1997
12/01
40
Thornton, CO
—
599
1,019
—
—
599
1,019
1,618
332
1998
12/01
40
Palm Bay, FL
—
1,035
1,512
—
—
1,035
1,512
2,547
178
2004
06/11
30
TGI Friday's:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
1,210
1,532
—
—
1,157
1,532
2,689
500
1995
12/01
40
The Beach:
Mason, OH
—
1,707
1,303
—
—
1,707
1,303
3,010
93
1985
03/13
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-55
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
The Containter Store:
Plano, TX
—
1,758
5,115
—
—
1,758
5,115
6,873
237
2009
05/13
35
The Snooty Fox:
Cincinnati, OH
—
282
521
403
—
543
662
1,205
186
1998
12/01
40
The Tile Shop:
Scarsdale, NY
—
4,509
2,454
321
—
4,509
2,775
7,284
675
1996
09/97
40
Third Federal Savings:
Parma, OH
—
370
238
1,100
—
370
1,338
1,708
441
1977
09/06
20
Tile Outlets of America:
Sarasota, FL
—
1,168
1,904
735
—
1,170
2,639
3,809
616
1988
09/97
40
TitleMax:
Geneva, IL
—
473
436
—
—
484
375
859
126
1996
12/01
40
Mobile, AL
—
491
498
—
—
491
498
989
163
1997
12/01
40
Dallas, TX
—
1,554
1,229
46
—
1,554
1,275
2,829
298
1982
06/05
40
Aiken, SC
—
442
646
—
—
442
646
1,088
137
1989
08/08
30
Anniston, AL
—
160
453
—
—
160
453
613
72
2008
08/08
40
Berkeley, MO
—
237
282
—
—
237
282
519
90
1961
08/08
20
Cheraw, SC
—
88
330
—
—
88
330
418
84
1976
08/08
25
Columbia, SC
—
212
319
—
—
212
319
531
68
1987
08/08
30
Dalton, GA
—
178
347
—
—
178
347
525
89
1972
08/08
25
Darlington, SC
—
47
267
—
—
47
267
314
68
1973
08/08
25
Fairfield, AL
—
133
178
—
—
133
178
311
45
1974
08/08
25
Gadsden, AL
—
250
389
—
—
250
389
639
62
2007
08/08
40
Hueytown, AL
—
135
93
—
—
135
93
228
59
1948
08/08
10
Jonesboro, GA
—
675
292
—
—
675
292
967
75
1970
08/08
25
Lawrenceville, GA
—
370
332
—
—
370
332
702
71
1986
08/08
30
Lewisburg, TN
—
70
298
—
—
70
298
368
54
1998
08/08
35
Macon, GA
—
103
290
—
—
103
290
393
92
1967
08/08
20
Marietta, GA
—
285
278
—
—
285
278
563
89
1967
08/08
20
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-56
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Memphis, TN
—
111
237
—
—
111
237
348
50
1981
08/08
30
Memphis, TN
—
226
444
—
—
226
444
670
94
1986
08/08
30
Montgomery, AL
—
96
233
—
—
96
233
329
59
1970
08/08
25
Nashville, TN
—
268
276
—
—
268
276
544
70
1978
08/08
25
Nashville, TN
—
256
301
—
—
256
301
557
64
1982
08/08
30
Norcross, GA
—
599
350
—
—
599
350
949
89
1975
08/08
25
Pulaski, TN
—
109
361
—
—
109
361
470
77
1986
08/08
30
Riverdale, GA
—
877
400
—
—
877
400
1,277
102
1978
08/08
25
Snellville, GA
—
565
396
—
—
565
396
961
101
1977
08/08
25
Springfield, MO
—
125
230
—
—
125
230
355
59
1979
08/08
25
Springfield, MO
—
220
400
—
—
220
400
620
102
1979
08/08
25
St. Louis, MO
—
134
398
—
—
134
398
532
72
1993
08/08
35
St. Louis, MO
—
244
288
—
—
244
288
532
73
1971
08/08
25
Sylacauga, AL
—
94
191
—
—
94
191
285
41
1986
08/08
30
Taylors, SC
—
299
372
—
—
299
372
671
68
1999
08/08
35
Bay Minette, AL
—
51
113
—
—
51
113
164
18
1980
01/11
25
N. Richland Hills, TX
—
132
132
—
—
132
132
264
26
1976
01/11
20
Petersburg, VA
—
139
366
—
—
139
366
505
71
1979
02/11
20
Savannah, GA
—
231
361
—
—
231
361
592
69
1972
03/11
20
Fort Worth, TX
—
131
312
—
—
119
312
431
47
1985
03/11
25
Hoover, AL
—
378
546
—
—
378
546
924
83
1970
03/11
25
Eufaula, AL
—
61
360
—
—
61
360
421
49
1980
08/11
25
Kansas City, MO
—
69
129
—
—
69
129
198
22
1920
08/11
20
Arnold, MO
—
321
120
—
—
321
120
441
19
1960
10/11
20
Bristol, VA
—
199
517
—
—
199
517
716
55
2001
10/11
30
Fairview Heights, IL
—
93
185
—
—
93
185
278
24
1979
10/11
25
Florissant, MO
—
143
153
—
—
143
153
296
20
1974
10/11
25
Greenville, SC
—
602
612
—
—
602
612
1,214
78
2008
10/11
25
Jonesboro, GA
—
301
683
—
—
301
683
984
63
2007
10/11
35
Olive Branch, MS
—
121
312
—
—
121
312
433
40
1978
10/11
25
Sugar Creek, MO
—
202
181
—
—
202
181
383
23
1978
10/11
25
Roanoke, VA
—
158
207
—
—
158
207
365
25
1950
08/12
20
Fredericksburg, VA
—
228
555
—
—
228
555
783
51
1989
09/12
25
Florissant, MO
—
119
288
—
—
119
288
407
23
1970
12/12
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-57
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Savannah, GA
—
259
359
—
—
259
359
618
17
2012
05/13
35
South Boston, VA
—
163
133
—
—
163
133
296
11
1980
05/13
20
O'Fallon, MO
—
75
261
—
—
75
261
336
12
1981
11/13
25
Tony's Tires:
Montgomery, AL
—
593
1,187
43
—
593
1,229
1,822
273
1998
08/06
40
Toys R Us:
Gastonia, NC
—
1,825
—
6,101
—
1,825
6,101
7,926
472
1998
10/11
(m)
35
Tractor Supply Co.:
Aransas Pass, TX
—
101
1,399
353
—
100
1,753
1,853
604
1983
03/99
40
Tully's:
Cheektowaga, NY
—
689
386
—
—
689
386
1,075
126
1994
12/01
40
Tutor Time:
Elk Grove, CA
—
1,216
2,786
9
—
1,216
2,750
3,966
381
2009
09/08
40
Twenty Seven Truck Stop:
Lake Placid, FL
—
2,532
1,157
491
—
2,532
1,648
4,180
400
1990
12/05
40
Twin Peaks:
Olathe, KS
—
525
731
—
—
525
731
1,256
90
2005
09/10
35
ULTA Salon, Cosmetics and Fragrance:
Florissant, MO
—
423
499
1,444
—
425
1,942
2,367
240
1996
04/03
(g)
40
Ultra Car Wash:
Mobile, AL
—
1,071
1,086
—
—
1,071
1,086
2,157
200
2005
08/07
40
Lilburn, GA
—
1,396
1,119
—
—
1,396
1,119
2,515
185
2004
05/08
40
Uni-Mart:
East Brady, PA
—
269
583
—
—
269
583
852
273
1987
08/05
20
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-58
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Pleasant Gap, PA
—
332
593
—
—
332
593
925
278
1996
08/05
20
Port Vue, PA
—
824
118
—
—
824
118
942
55
1953
08/05
20
Punxsutawney, PA
—
253
542
—
—
253
542
795
254
1983
08/05
20
Shamokin, PA
—
324
506
—
—
324
506
830
237
1956
08/05
20
Shippensburg, PA
—
204
330
—
—
204
330
534
155
1989
08/05
20
Wilkes-Barre, PA
—
178
471
—
—
178
471
649
221
1989
08/05
20
Wilkes-Barre, PA
—
171
422
—
—
171
422
593
198
1999
08/05
20
Wilkes-Barre, PA
—
876
1,957
—
—
876
1,957
2,833
917
1998
08/05
20
Williamsport, PA
—
909
122
—
—
909
122
1,031
57
1950
08/05
20
Ashland, PA
—
355
545
—
—
355
545
900
253
1977
09/05
20
Mountaintop, PA
—
423
616
—
—
423
616
1,039
286
1987
09/05
20
Effort, PA
—
1,297
1,202
—
—
1,297
1,202
2,499
269
2000
01/06
40
Hughesville, PA
—
290
566
—
—
290
566
856
127
1977
01/06
40
McSherrystown, PA
—
135
365
—
—
135
365
500
82
1988
01/06
40
Milesburg, PA
—
134
373
—
—
134
373
507
84
1987
01/06
40
Nanticoke, PA
—
175
482
—
—
175
482
657
108
1988
01/06
40
Nuangola, PA
—
1,062
1,203
—
—
1,062
1,203
2,265
269
2000
01/06
40
Plains, PA
—
204
401
—
—
204
401
605
90
1994
01/06
40
Punxsutawney, PA
—
294
650
—
—
294
650
944
146
1983
01/06
40
Williamsport, PA
—
295
379
—
—
295
379
674
85
1988
01/06
40
Burnham, PA
—
265
510
—
—
340
435
775
184
1978
07/06
20
Uni-Mart Summerville:
Summerville, PA
—
93
272
17
—
93
289
382
62
1988
01/06
40
United Rentals:
Carrollton, TX
—
478
535
—
—
478
535
1,013
134
1981
12/04
40
Cedar Park, TX (n)
—
535
829
—
—
535
829
1,364
208
1990
12/04
40
Clearwater, FL (n)
—
1,173
1,811
—
—
1,173
1,811
2,984
455
2001
12/04
40
Fort Collins, CO (n)
—
2,057
978
—
—
2,057
978
3,035
246
1975
12/04
40
Irving, TX
—
708
911
—
—
708
911
1,619
229
1984
12/04
40
La Porte, TX
—
1,115
2,125
—
—
1,115
2,125
3,240
534
2000
12/04
40
Littleton, CO
—
1,743
1,944
—
—
1,743
1,944
3,687
488
2002
12/04
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
744
1,265
—
—
744
1,265
2,009
318
1997
12/04
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-59
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Perrysberg, OH
—
642
1,119
—
—
642
1,119
1,761
281
1979
12/04
40
Plano, TX
—
1,030
1,148
—
—
1,030
1,148
2,178
288
1996
12/04
40
Temple, TX (n)
—
1,160
1,360
—
—
1,160
1,360
2,520
342
1998
12/04
40
Fort Worth, TX
—
1,428
—
—
—
1,428
(i)
1,428
(i)
(i)
01/05
(i)
Fort Worth, TX
—
510
1,128
—
—
510
1,128
1,638
281
1997
01/05
40
Melbourne, FL
—
747
607
—
—
747
607
1,354
146
1970
05/05
40
University of Phoenix:
Glen Allen, VA
—
2,177
2,600
670
—
2,177
3,270
5,447
1,309
1995
06/95
40
Vacant Land:
Indianapolis, IN
—
640
1,107
62
—
700
(e)
700
(e)
(e)
12/01
(e)
Southfield, MI
—
405
644
—
—
497
(e)
497
39
(e)
12/01
15
Tucson, AZ
—
1,156
—
—
—
707
(e)
707
(e)
(e)
07/06
(e)
Bonita Springs, FL
—
112
—
—
—
25
(e)
25
(e)
(e)
09/06
(e)
Lancaster, OH
—
1,035
—
—
—
218
(e)
218
(e)
(e)
01/08
(e)
Bakersfield, CA
—
3,303
3,845
—
—
1,826
(e)
1,826
(e)
(e)
03/08
(e)
Vacant Property:
Orlando, FL
—
820
2,441
6
—
820
2,448
3,268
1,259
1992
05/93
40
Homestead, PA
—
1,139
—
2,158
—
1,139
2,158
3,297
650
1994
02/97
31
Kenosha, WI
—
1,918
3,431
—
—
1,918
3,431
5,349
1,529
1992
02/97
40
Conyers, GA
—
320
556
—
—
320
556
876
244
1997
06/97
40
Harlingen, TX
—
317
756
120
—
317
876
1,193
303
1999
11/98
(f)
40
Alpharetta, GA
—
3,033
1,642
—
—
3,033
1,642
4,675
535
1999
12/01
40
Burton, MI
—
620
707
—
—
620
707
1,327
231
1997
12/01
40
Hammond, LA
—
248
814
62
—
248
627
875
217
1997
12/01
40
Kennedale, TX
—
400
692
—
—
391
692
1,083
226
1985
12/01
40
Lewisville, TX
—
1,370
1,019
—
—
1,370
1,019
2,389
332
1994
12/01
40
Mesa, AZ
—
153
400
—
—
153
400
553
131
1997
12/01
40
Montgomery, AL
—
1,418
1,140
—
—
1,418
1,044
2,462
347
1999
12/01
40
S. Beaumont, TX
—
439
1,363
—
—
439
1,363
1,802
445
2000
12/01
40
Swansea, IL
—
46
133
57
—
46
190
236
25
1997
12/01
(g)
40
Tacoma, WA
—
527
795
—
—
527
795
1,322
259
1981
12/01
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-60
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Woodstock, GA
—
1,937
1,285
—
—
1,297
277
1,574
277
1997
05/03
40
St. Louis, MO
—
556
3,688
—
—
556
3,688
4,244
965
1975
05/04
40
Hudson Falls, NY
—
57
780
39
—
57
819
876
209
1990
09/04
40
Columbus, OH
—
1,596
934
13
—
1,605
939
2,544
238
1970
11/04
40
Fort Worth, TX
—
2,505
2,138
—
—
2,505
2,138
4,643
528
1988
02/05
40
Fort Worth, TX
—
988
2,368
—
—
988
2,368
3,356
585
1997
02/05
40
Dallas, PA
—
214
345
—
—
214
345
559
162
1995
08/05
20
Abbottstown, PA
—
55
200
—
—
55
200
255
45
2000
01/06
40
Carlisle, PA
—
87
103
—
—
87
103
190
22
1988
01/06
40
Indianapolis, IN
—
223
483
59
—
223
542
765
214
1979
09/06
20
Little Rock, AR
—
672
77
44
—
672
121
793
35
1979
09/06
20
Farmington, NM
—
2,757
—
730
—
2,757
730
3,487
121
2003
12/07
(m)
40
Bakersfield, CA
—
2,099
2,011
15
—
1,774
39
1,813
39
1990
03/08
40
Lubbock, TX
—
943
957
—
—
943
957
1,900
197
1964
11/10
20
Bristol, VA
—
63
184
—
—
63
184
247
1
2000
07/14
25
Value City Furniture:
White Marsh, MD
—
3,762
—
3,006
—
3,762
3,006
6,768
1,262
1998
10/97
(g)
40
VCA Animal Hospital:
Mission, KS
—
891
3,758
—
—
852
3,758
4,610
350
2000
03/12
30
Verizon Wireless:
Anderson, SC (n)
—
38
—
—
—
38
—
38
(e)
(e)
07/14
35
Bristol, VA
—
175
512
—
—
175
512
687
12
2000
07/14
25
Virginia College:
Knoxville, TN
—
1,500
5,571
—
—
1,500
5,571
7,071
426
1996
09/12
30
Vitamin Shoppe, The:
Cincinnati, OH
—
297
443
385
—
312
813
1,125
231
1999
06/98
40
Voodoo Skate Center:
Aransas Pass, TX
—
90
1,241
137
—
89
1,378
1,467
504
1983
03/99
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-61
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Walgreens:
Sunrise, FL
—
1,958
1,401
—
—
1,958
1,401
3,359
407
1994
05/03
40
Tulsa, OK
—
1,193
3,056
—
—
1,193
3,056
4,249
729
2003
06/05
40
Boise, ID
—
792
1,875
—
—
792
1,875
2,667
300
2000
03/10
30
Nampa, ID
—
1,062
2,253
—
—
1,062
2,253
3,315
360
2000
03/10
30
Pueblo, CO
—
899
3,313
—
—
899
3,313
4,212
336
2000
12/11
30
Rapid City, SD
—
1,387
2,957
—
—
1,387
2,957
4,344
250
2000
01/12
35
Hamilton, OH
—
731
2,879
—
—
731
2,879
3,610
284
2000
01/12
30
Waterford Nails & Spa:
Orlando, FL
19
(h)
40
111
—
—
40
111
151
30
2001
02/04
40
Wawa:
Clearwater, FL
—
1,184
2,526
44
—
1,476
(i)
1,476
(i)
(i)
05/93
(i)
Wehrenberg Theater:
Cedar Rapids, IA
—
1,567
8,433
—
—
1,567
8,433
10,000
729
2011
07/11
40
Wendy's:
Sacramento, CA
—
586
—
—
—
586
(i)
586
(i)
(i)
02/98
(i)
New Kensington, PA (n)
—
501
333
—
—
501
333
834
109
1980
12/01
40
Orland Park, IL
—
562
556
—
—
562
377
939
125
1995
12/01
40
Boerne, TX
—
456
679
—
—
456
679
1,135
55
1986
12/12
25
Brownsburg, IN
—
242
1,483
—
—
242
1,483
1,725
121
1984
12/12
25
Converse, TX
—
301
554
—
—
301
554
855
32
2007
12/12
35
Everett, WA
—
486
437
—
—
486
437
923
36
1979
12/12
25
Everett, WA
—
339
1,018
—
—
339
1,018
1,357
69
2000
12/12
30
Fishers, IN
—
544
514
—
—
544
514
1,058
35
2000
12/12
30
Fishers, IN
—
766
717
—
—
766
717
1,483
49
1990
12/12
30
Henderson, NV
—
398
1,028
—
—
398
1,028
1,426
70
1991
12/12
30
Henderson, NV
—
370
311
—
—
370
311
681
25
1988
12/12
25
Indianapolis, IN
—
281
1,018
—
—
281
1,018
1,299
69
1996
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
320
602
—
—
320
602
922
41
1998
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
271
1,221
—
—
271
1,221
1,492
100
1974
12/12
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-62
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Indianapolis, IN
—
252
1,454
—
—
252
1,454
1,706
99
1999
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
213
1,444
—
—
213
1,444
1,657
84
2003
12/12
35
Indianapolis, IN
—
87
1,009
—
—
87
1,009
1,096
82
1973
12/12
25
Indianapolis, IN
—
320
1,086
—
—
320
1,086
1,406
74
1993
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
417
1,318
—
—
417
1,318
1,735
90
1991
12/12
30
Las Vegas, NV
—
475
1,202
—
—
475
1,202
1,677
98
1986
12/12
25
Las Vegas, NV
—
360
253
—
—
360
253
613
21
1980
12/12
25
Las Vegas, NV
—
368
1,095
—
—
368
1,095
1,463
75
1999
12/12
30
Las Vegas, NV
—
475
1,182
—
—
475
1,182
1,657
80
1996
12/12
30
Las Vegas, NV
—
533
1,424
—
—
533
1,424
1,957
97
2001
12/12
30
Las Vegas, NV
—
368
1,018
—
—
368
1,018
1,386
69
2001
12/12
30
Lynnwood, WA
—
571
1,695
—
—
571
1,695
2,266
138
1978
12/12
25
N. Las Vegas, NV
—
310
1,463
—
—
310
1,463
1,773
85
2001
12/12
35
Noblesville, IN
—
582
979
—
—
582
979
1,561
67
1998
12/12
30
Port Orchard, WA
—
784
1,540
—
—
784
1,540
2,324
105
1996
12/12
30
Poulsbo, WA
—
620
901
—
—
620
901
1,521
46
2012
12/12
40
San Antonio, TX
—
553
892
—
—
303
892
1,195
73
1986
12/12
25
San Antonio, TX
—
688
727
—
—
688
727
1,415
49
1993
12/12
30
San Antonio, TX
—
242
1,067
—
—
242
1,067
1,309
87
1977
12/12
25
San Antonio, TX
—
931
223
—
—
931
223
1,154
15
1993
12/12
30
San Antonio, TX
—
370
272
—
—
370
272
642
19
1993
12/12
30
Lexington Park, MD
—
327
773
—
—
327
773
1,100
12
1982
07/14
30
Whataburger:
Albuquerque, NM
—
624
419
—
—
624
419
1,043
137
1995
12/01
40
Wherehouse Music:
Homewood, AL
—
1,032
697
—
—
1,032
697
1,729
227
1997
12/01
40
Independence, MO
—
503
1,209
—
—
503
1,209
1,712
273
1994
12/05
40
Wingfoot:
Anthony, TX
—
(l)
1,242
6
—
(l)
1,248
1,248
232
2007
02/07
40
Beaverdam, OH
—
(l)
1,521
—
—
(l)
1,521
1,521
290
2004
05/07
40
Benton, AR
—
(l)
309
—
—
(l)
309
309
58
2001
05/07
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-63
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Bowman, SC
—
(l)
969
—
—
(l)
969
969
211
1998
05/07
35
Dalton, GA
—
(l)
1,541
—
—
(l)
1,541
1,541
294
2004
05/07
40
Dandridge, TN
—
(l)
1,030
—
—
(l)
1,030
1,030
224
1989
05/07
35
Franklin, OH
—
(l)
563
—
—
(l)
563
563
123
1998
05/07
35
Gary, IN
—
(l)
1,486
—
—
(l)
1,486
1,486
283
2004
05/07
40
Georgetown, KY
—
(l)
679
—
—
(l)
679
679
173
1997
05/07
30
Mebane, NC
—
(l)
561
—
—
(l)
561
561
122
1998
05/07
35
Piedmont, SC
—
(l)
567
—
—
(l)
567
567
123
1999
05/07
35
Port Wentworth, GA
—
(l)
552
—
—
(l)
552
552
120
1998
05/07
35
Valdosta, GA
—
(l)
1,477
—
—
(l)
1,477
1,477
282
2004
05/07
40
Temple, GA
—
(l)
1,065
—
—
(l)
1,065
1,065
190
2007
06/07
40
Whiteland, IN
—
(l)
1,471
—
—
(l)
1,471
1,471
274
2004
07/07
40
Des Moines, IA
—
(l)
816
—
—
(l)
816
816
152
1987
07/07
40
Robinson, TX
—
(l)
1,183
—
—
(l)
1,183
1,183
211
2007
07/07
40
Kearney, MO
—
(l)
1,269
—
—
(l)
1,269
1,269
237
2003
07/07
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
(l)
1,247
—
—
(l)
1,247
1,247
214
2008
08/07
40
Amarillo, TX
—
(l)
1,158
—
—
(l)
1,158
1,158
189
2008
02/08
40
Jackson, MS
—
(l)
1,281
—
—
(l)
1,281
1,281
207
2008
03/08
40
Glendale, KY
—
(l)
1,066
—
—
(l)
1,066
1,066
165
2008
07/08
40
Lebanon, TN
—
(l)
1,331
—
—
(l)
1,331
1,331
201
2008
08/08
40
Laredo, TX
—
(l)
1,238
—
—
(l)
1,238
1,238
179
2009
11/08
(j)
40
Midland, TX
—
(l)
1,148
—
—
(l)
1,148
1,148
128
2010
04/10
(j)
40
Tuscaloosa, AL
—
(l)
1,002
—
—
(l)
1,002
1,002
101
2010
08/10
(j)
40
Kenly, NC
—
(l)
1,066
—
—
(l)
1,066
1,066
103
2011
11/10
(j)
40
Matthews, MO
—
(l)
1,042
50
—
(l)
1,092
1,092
96
2011
01/11
(j)
40
Baytown, TX
—
(l)
—
1,375
—
(l)
1,375
1,375
116
2011
05/11
(j)
40
Sunbury, OH
—
(l)
—
1,424
—
(l)
1,424
1,424
108
2011
06/11
(j)
40
Greenwood, LA
—
(l)
—
1,291
—
(l)
1,291
1,291
101
2011
06/11
(j)
40
Joplin, MO
—
(l)
—
1,168
—
(l)
1,168
1,168
91
2011
06/11
(j)
40
Winslow, AZ
—
(l)
—
1,613
—
(l)
1,613
1,613
116
2012
09/11
(j)
40
Gulfport, MS
—
(l)
—
1,377
—
(l)
1,377
1,377
93
2012
11/11
(j)
40
Sulphur Springs, TX
—
(l)
—
1,283
—
(l)
1,283
1,283
84
2012
12/11
(j)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-64
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Winn-Dixie:
Columbus, GA
—
1,023
1,875
—
—
1,023
1,875
2,898
537
1984
07/03
40
Wireless Wizard:
Ridgeland, MS
—
436
523
133
—
436
656
1,092
134
1997
08/06
40
Your Choice:
Hazleton, PA
—
670
377
—
—
670
377
1,047
177
1974
08/05
20
Montoursville, PA
—
158
415
13
—
158
428
586
95
1988
01/06
40
Ziebart:
Maplewood, MN
—
308
311
—
—
308
311
619
77
1990
02/05
40
Middleburg Heights, OH
—
199
148
—
—
199
148
347
37
1961
02/05
40
Zio's Italian Kitchen:
Aurora, CO
—
1,168
1,105
—
—
1,168
1,105
2,273
351
2000
06/05
30
Leasehold Interests:
Lima, OH
—
1,290
—
—
—
1,290
(e)
1,290
1,254
(e)
08/01
(e)
SUBTOTAL
$
26,000
$
1,787,519
$
2,915,411
$
536,524
$
—
$
1,785,779
$
3,414,698
$
5,200,477
$
511,702
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-65
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Direct Financing Leases:
CVS:
Lafayette, LA
$
—
$
—
$
949
$
—
$
—
$
—
(c)
(c)
(c)
1995
01/96
(c)
Oklahoma City, OK
—
(l)
1,365
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
1997
06/97
(c)
Oklahoma City, OK
—
(l)
1,419
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
1997
06/97
(c)
Denny's:
Stockton, CA
—
940
509
—
—
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
1982
09/06
(d)
Food 4 Less:
Chula Vista, CA
—
—
4,266
—
—
—
(c)
(c)
(c)
1995
11/98
(c)
Jared Jewelers:
Phoenix, AZ
—
(l)
1,242
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
1998
12/01
(c)
Toledo, OH
—
(l)
1,458
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
1998
12/01
(c)
Lewisville, TX
116
(k)
(l)
1,503
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
1998
12/01
(c)
Glendale, AZ
—
(l)
1,599
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
1998
12/01
(c)
Oviedo, FL
223
(k)
—
1,500
—
—
—
(c)
(c)
(c)
1998
06/13
(c)
Kash n' Karry:
Valrico, FL
—
1,235
3,255
—
—
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
1997
06/02
(d)
Rite Aid:
Kennett Square, PA
—
(l)
—
1,984
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
2000
12/00
(c)
Arlington, VA
—
(l)
3,201
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
2000
02/02
(c)
Sunshine Energy:
Altamont, KS
—
124
142
—
—
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
1979
07/09
(d)
SUBTOTAL
$
339
$
2,299
$
22,408
$
1,984
$
—
$
—
—
—
—
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-66
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Sale the Company has Invested in:
7-Eleven:
Latrobe, PA
$
—
$
613
$
326
$
—
$
—
$
613
$
326
$
939
$
—
1989
07/14
—
Chipotle:
Hadley, MA
—
45
—
—
—
453
—
453
(e)
(e)
02/08
—
Power Center:
Irving, TX
—
951
1,090
—
—
600
602
1,202
—
1987
02/06
—
Vacant Land:
Grand Prairie, TX
—
387
—
—
—
108
—
108
(e)
(e)
12/02
—
Rockwall, TX
—
900
—
—
—
545
—
545
(e)
(e)
02/06
—
Hadley, MA
—
2,824
—
—
—
106
—
106
(e)
(e)
02/08
—
Vacant Property:
Arlington, TX
—
596
1,411
—
—
596
1,411
2,007
720
1994
01/94
(r)
40
Corpus Christi, TX
—
224
2,159
145
—
224
1,282
1,506
753
1983
03/99
(r)
40
SUBTOTAL
$
—
$
6,540
$
4,986
$
145
$
—
$
3,245
$
3,621
$
6,866
$
1,473
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-67
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
December 31, 2014
(dollars in thousands)
(a)
Transactions in real estate and accumulated depreciation during
2014
,
2013
, and
2012
are summarized as follows:
2014
2013
2012
Land, buildings, and leasehold interests:
Balance at the beginning of year
$
4,686,844
$
4,145,368
$
3,531,845
Acquisitions, completed construction and tenant improvements
601,168
602,836
701,054
Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests
(50,938
)
(57,254
)
(77,219
)
Provision for loss on impairment of real estate
(823
)
(4,106
)
(10,312
)
Balance at the close of year
$
5,236,251
$
4,686,844
$
4,145,368
Accumulated depreciation and amortization:
Balance at the beginning of year
$
418,136
$
333,778
$
270,621
Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests
(9,153
)
(6,778
)
(6,980
)
Depreciation and amortization expense
104,192
91,136
70,137
Balance at the close of year
$
513,175
$
418,136
$
333,778
As of
December 31, 2014
,
2013
, and
2012
, the detailed real estate schedule excludes work in progress of
$28,908
,
$60,720
and
$86,579
, respectively, which is included in the above reconciliation.
(b)
As of
December 31, 2014
, the leases are treated as either operating or financing leases for federal income tax purposes. As of
December 31, 2014
, the aggregate cost of the properties owned by NNN that are under operating leases were
$5,119,673
and financing leases were
$2,703
.
(c)
For financial reporting purposes, the portion of the lease relating to the building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.
(d)
For financial reporting purposes, the lease for the land and building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.
(e)
NNN owns only the land for this property.
(f)
Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN purchased the buildings from the tenants upon completion of construction, generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.
(g)
Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. NNN developed the buildings, generally completing construction within 12 months from the acquisition date of the land.
(h)
Property is encumbered as a part of NNN's
$6,952
long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.
(i)
NNN owns only the land for this property, which is subject to a ground lease between NNN and the tenant. The tenant funded the improvements on the property.
(j)
The land is subject to a ground lease between NNN and an unrelated third party. Pursuant to the lease agreement, NNN funds the tenant’s construction draws, final funding occurs generally within 12 months from the execution of the ground lease.
(k)
NNN owns only the building for this property, which is encumbered by a fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.
(l)
NNN owns only the building for this property. The land is subject to a ground lease between NNN and an unrelated third party.
(m)
Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN funds the tenant’s construction draws, final funding occurs generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-68
(n)
The tenant of this property has subleased the property. The tenant continues to be responsible for complying with all the terms of the lease agreement and is continuing to pay rent on this property to NNN.
(o)
Date acquired represents acquisition date of land and building. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN funds additional tenant construction draws. Final funding generally within 12 months from acquisition.
(p)
Property is encumbered as a part of NNN's
$15,151
long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement, net of premium.
(q)
Building improvements are pending completion which is anticipated to occur within six months. Depreciation will commence upon completion.
(r)
As of December 31, 2014, this property has been classified as held for sale. Accumulated depreciation and amortization were recorded prior to this reclassification.
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-69
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 2014
(dollars in thousands)
Description
Interest
Rate
Maturity
Date
Periodic
Payment
Terms
Prior
Liens
Face
Amount
of Mortgages
Carrying
Amount of
Mortgages (f)
Principal
Amount
of Loans Subject
to Delinquent
Principal or
Interest
First mortgages on properties:
Paramus, NJ
9.000
%
2/1/2022
(b)
—
$
6,000
$
3,725
$
—
Des Moines, IA
(d)
(d)
(d)
—
400
118
118
Milford, CT
7.000
%
6/30/2016
(c)
—
1,550
1,550
—
Marlow Heights, MD
7.000
%
5/14/2016
(c)
—
750
750
—
Hillman, MI
7.500
%
6/1/2017
(c)
—
62
62
—
4 properties in FL and GA
6.250
%
6/1/2015
(e)
—
5,500
4,725
—
$
14,262
$
10,930
(a)
$
118
(a)
The following shows the changes in the carrying amounts of mortgage loans during the years:
2014
2013
2012
Balance at beginning of year
$
14,430
$
17,482
$
22,815
New mortgage loans
7,307
(g)
3,547
(g)
7,344
(g)
Deductions during the year:
Collections of principal
(10,807
)
(6,599
)
(12,339
)
Foreclosures
—
—
(338
)
Balance at the close of year
$
10,930
$
14,430
$
17,482
(b)
Principal and interest is payable at level amounts over the life of the loan.
(c)
Interest only payments are due monthly. Principal is due at maturity.
(d)
This mortgage loan matured in November 2014 and the principal balance is currently delinquent. NNN and the borrower are currently in negotiations to reinstate the loan under modified terms.
(e)
Interest only payments are due monthly. Periodic principal payments are due over the course of the loan based on specific terms outlined in the loan agreement, with the remaining principal balance due at maturity.
(f)
Mortgages held by NNN and its subsidiaries for federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were
$10,930
,
$14,430
, and
$17,482
, respectively.
(g)
Mortgages totaling
$7,307
,
$3,547
, and
$7,344
, were accepted in connection with real estate transactions for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.