Companies:
10,660
total market cap:
$139.881 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
NNN REIT
NNN
#2359
Rank
$8.01 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$42.18
Share price
0.64%
Change (1 day)
11.47%
Change (1 year)
๐ Real estate
๐ฐ Investment
๐๏ธ REITs
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
Annual Reports (10-K)
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
NNN REIT
Annual Reports (10-K)
Financial Year 2016
NNN REIT - 10-K annual report 2016
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 001-11290
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
56-1431377
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
450 South Orange Avenue, Suite 900
Orlando, Florida 32801
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (407) 265-7348
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
6.625% Series D Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value
5.700% Series E Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value
5.200% Series F Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value
Name of exchange on which registered:
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act Yes
¨
No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
¨
No
x
The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30,
2016
was $7,472,258,000.
The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2017 was 147,235,328.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Registrant incorporates by reference into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K portions of National Retail Properties, Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Regulation 14A. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
REFERENCE
Part I
Item 1.
Business
1
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
6
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
14
Item 2.
Properties
14
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
14
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
14
Part II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
15
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
18
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
20
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
37
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
38
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
68
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
68
Item 9B.
Other Information
69
Part III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
70
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
70
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
70
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
70
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
70
Part IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
71
Signatures
76
PART I
Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the terms “registrant” or “NNN” or the “Company” refer to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN may elect to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”
Statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the documents that are incorporated by reference, that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Also, when NNN uses any of the words “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” or similar expressions, NNN is making forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon present expectations and reasonable assumptions, NNN’s actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those NNN anticipates or projects are described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any document incorporated herein by reference. NNN undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1.
Business
The Company
NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. NNN's assets are primarily real estate assets. NNN's consolidated financial statements are included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Real Estate Assets
NNN acquires, owns, invests in and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and are primarily held for investment ("Properties" or "Property Portfolio," or individually a "Property"). NNN owned
2,535
Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately
27,204,000
square feet, located in
48
states, with a weighted average remaining lease term of
11.6
years as of
December 31, 2016
. Approximately
99
percent of the Properties were leased as of
December 31, 2016
.
Competition
NNN generally competes with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors including but not limited to insurance companies, pension funds and financial institutions that own, manage, finance or develop retail and net leased properties.
Employees
As of January 31, 2017
, NNN employed
65
associates.
Other Information
NNN’s executive offices are located at 450 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 900, Orlando, Florida 32801, and its telephone number is (407) 265-7348. NNN has a website at
www.nnnreit.com
where NNN’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") can be downloaded free of charge.
The common shares of National Retail Properties, Inc. are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") under the ticker symbol "NNN." National Retail Properties, Inc. has three series of preferred shares outstanding which are traded on the NYSE: the depositary shares, each representing a 1/100
th
of a share of 6.625% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share ("Series D Preferred Stock"), the depositary shares, each representing a 1/100
th
of a share of 5.700% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series E Preferred Stock”), and the depositary shares, each representing a 1/100
th
of a share of 5.200% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series F Preferred Stock”).
1
Business Strategies and Policies
The following is a discussion of NNN’s operating strategy and certain of its investment, financing and other policies. These strategies and policies have been set by management and the Board of Directors and, in general, may be amended or revised from time to time by management and the Board of Directors without a vote of NNN’s stockholders.
Operating Strategies
NNN’s strategy is to invest primarily in retail real estate that is typically well located within each local market for its tenants’ retail lines of trade. Management believes that these types of properties, generally leased pursuant to triple-net leases, provide attractive opportunities for stable current returns and the potential for increased returns and capital appreciation. Triple-net leases typically require the tenant to pay property operating expenses such as insurance, utilities, repairs, maintenance, capital expenditures and real estate taxes and assessments. Initial lease terms are generally 10 to 20 years.
NNN holds real estate assets until it determines that the sale of such an asset is advantageous in view of NNN’s investment objectives. In deciding whether to sell a real estate asset, NNN may consider factors such as potential capital appreciation, net cash flow, tenant credit quality, tenant's line of trade, portfolio composition, market lease rates, local market conditions, potential use of sale proceeds and federal income tax considerations.
NNN’s management team focuses on certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. These key indicators include the composition of the Property Portfolio (such as tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of the Property Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios and profitability measures, and industry trends and performance compared to NNN.
The operating strategies employed by NNN have allowed NNN to increase the annual dividend (paid quarterly) per common share for
27
consecutive years. NNN is one of only four publicly traded REITs to increase its annual dividend per common share for
27
or more consecutive years.
Investment in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate
NNN’s management believes that single tenant, freestanding net lease retail properties will continue to provide attractive investment opportunities and that NNN is well suited to take advantage of these opportunities because of its experience in accessing capital markets, and its ability to source, underwrite and acquire properties.
In evaluating a particular acquisition, management may consider a variety of factors, including but not limited to:
•
the location, visibility and accessibility of the property,
•
the geographic area and demographic characteristics of the community, as well as the local real estate market conditions, including potential for growth, market rents, and existing or potential competing properties or retailers,
•
the size, age and title status of the property,
•
the quality of construction and design and the current physical condition of the Property Portfolio,
•
the potential for, and current extent of, any environmental problems,
•
the purchase price,
•
the non-financial terms of the proposed acquisition,
•
the availability of funds or other consideration for the proposed acquisition and the cost thereof,
•
the compatibility of the property with NNN’s existing portfolio,
•
the property-level operating history,
•
the financial and other characteristics of the existing tenant,
•
the tenant’s business plan, operating history and management team,
•
the tenant’s industry,
•
the terms of any lease,
•
the rent to be paid by the tenant, and
•
any existing indebtedness encumbering the property which may be assumed in connection with acquiring or refinancing these investments.
NNN intends to engage in future investment activities in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of its status as a
2
REIT for federal income tax purposes. Additionally, NNN does not intend to engage in activities that will make NNN an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
Investments in Real Estate Mortgages and Securities of or Interests in Persons Engaged in Real Estate Activities
While NNN’s primary business objectives emphasize retail properties, NNN may invest in (i) a wide variety of property and tenant types, (ii) leases, mortgages and other types of real estate interests, (iii) loans secured by personal property, (iv) loans secured by partnership or membership interests in partnerships or limited liability companies, respectively, or (v) securities of other REITs, or other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities.
Financing Strategy
NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategies while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to its stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.
NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional properties with advances from its
$650,000,000
unsecured revolving credit facility ("Credit Facility"). As of
December 31, 2016
, there was
no
outstanding balance and
$650,000,000
was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling
$230,000
.
As of
December 31, 2016
, NNN’s ratio of total debt to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation and amortization) was approximately
30
percent and the ratio of secured indebtedness to total gross assets was less than
one
percent. The ratio of total debt to total market capitalization was approximately
22
percent. Certain financial agreements contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur additional debt under certain circumstances.
NNN anticipates it will be able to obtain additional financing for short-term and long-term liquidity requirements as further described in "Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity." However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.
The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy at any time.
Strategies and Policy Changes
Any of NNN’s strategies or policies described above may be changed at any time by NNN without notice to or a vote of NNN’s stockholders.
Property Portfolio
As of
December 31, 2016
, NNN owned
2,535
Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately
27,204,000
square feet, located in
48
states, with a weighted average remaining lease term of
11.6
years. Approximately
99
percent of total Properties were leased as of
December 31, 2016
.
The following table summarizes the Property Portfolio at
December 31, 2016
(in thousands):
Size
(1)
Total Dollars Invested
(2)
High
Low
Average
High
Low
Average
Land
3,733
2
102
$
8,882
$
5
$
855
Building
142
1
11
45,286
19
1,826
(1)
Approximate square feet.
(2)
Costs vary depending upon size, local market conditions and other factors.
3
As of
December 31, 2016
, NNN has committed to fund construction commitments on
21
Properties. The improvements are estimated to be completed within 12 months. These construction commitments, at
December 31, 2016
, are outlined in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Total commitment
(1)
$
114,206
Amount funded
$
54,782
Remaining commitment
$
59,424
(1)
Includes land, construction costs, tenant improvements and lease costs.
Leases
The following is a summary of the general structure of the leases in the Property Portfolio, although the specific terms of each lease can vary. Generally, the Property leases provide for initial terms of 10 to 20 years. As of
December 31, 2016
, the weighted average remaining lease term of the Property Portfolio was approximately
11.6
years. The Properties are generally leased under net leases, pursuant to which the tenant typically bears responsibility for substantially all property costs and expenses associated with ongoing maintenance and operation, including utilities, property taxes and insurance. NNN's leases provide for annual base rental payments (payable in monthly installments) ranging from $6,000 to $3,714,000 (average of $218,000), and generally provide for increases in rent as a result of (i) increases in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), (ii) fixed increases, or, to a lesser extent, (iii) increases in the tenant’s sales volume.
Generally, NNN's leases provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions provided under the initial lease term. Some of the leases also provide that in the event NNN wishes to sell the Property subject to that lease, NNN first must offer the lessee the right to purchase the Property on the same terms and conditions as any offer which NNN intends to accept for the sale of the Property.
The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of the Property Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of
December 31, 2016
:
% of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
% of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
2017
1.2%
27
502,000
2023
2.5%
85
1,014,000
2018
3.2%
90
1,153,000
2024
2.6%
50
883,000
2019
3.0%
76
1,122,000
2025
5.0%
132
1,116,000
2020
3.8%
132
1,571,000
2026
6.0%
181
1,830,000
2021
4.4%
122
1,320,000
Thereafter
62.2%
1,495
14,733,000
2022
6.1%
111
1,456,000
(1)
Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of
December 31, 2016
.
(2)
Approximate square feet.
4
The following table summarizes the diversification of the Property Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:
% of Annual Base Rent
(1)
Top 10 Lines of Trade
2016
2015
2014
1.
Convenience stores
16.9%
16.7%
18.0%
2.
Restaurants - full service
11.8%
11.0%
9.1%
3.
Restaurants - limited service
7.5%
7.2%
6.5%
4.
Automotive service
6.6%
7.0%
7.2%
5.
Family entertainment centers
5.8%
5.6%
5.1%
6.
Health and fitness
5.7%
3.8%
3.9%
7.
Theaters
4.9%
5.2%
5.2%
8.
Automotive parts
3.9%
4.2%
4.7%
9.
Recreational vehicle dealers, parts and accessories
3.4%
3.6%
3.1%
10.
Banks
3.1%
3.4%
3.7%
Other
30.4%
32.3%
33.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
(1)
Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.
The following table summarizes the diversification of the Property Portfolio by state as of
December 31, 2016
:
State
# of
Properties
% of
Annual
Base Rent
(1)
1.
Texas
448
18.4%
2.
Florida
197
9.1%
3.
Illinois
132
5.7%
4.
Ohio
165
5.7%
5.
North Carolina
134
4.7%
6.
Georgia
118
4.3%
7.
Indiana
118
4.2%
8.
Virginia
88
3.5%
9.
Alabama
101
3.0%
10.
Tennessee
77
2.8%
Other
957
38.6%
2,535
100.0%
(1)
Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of
December 31, 2016
.
As of
December 31, 2016
, NNN did not have any tenant that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental income.
5
Governmental Regulations Affecting Properties
Property Environmental Considerations.
Subject to a determination of the level of risk and potential cost of remediation, NNN may acquire a property where some level of environmental contamination may exist. Investments in real property create a potential for substantial environmental liability for the owner of such property from the presence or discharge of hazardous materials on the property or the improper disposal of hazardous materials emanating from the property, regardless of fault. In order to mitigate exposure to environmental liability, NNN maintains an environmental insurance policy which provides some coverage for substantially all of the properties. Such policy expires in August 2018. As a part of its acquisition due diligence process, NNN obtains an environmental site assessment for each property. In such cases where NNN intends to acquire a property where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the problem, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance to address environmental conditions at the property.
As of
February 6, 2017
, NNN has
76
Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation and/or monitoring. In general, the seller, a previous owner, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Properties.
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
The Properties, as commercial facilities, are required to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and similar state and local laws and regulations (collectively, the "ADA"). The tenants will typically have primary responsibility for complying with the ADA, but NNN may incur costs if the tenant does not comply. As of
February 6, 2017
, NNN has not been notified by any governmental authority of, nor is NNN’s management aware of, any non-compliance with the ADA that NNN’s management believes would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position or results of operations.
Other Regulations.
State and local fire, life-safety and similar entities regulate the use of the Properties. NNN’s leases generally require each tenant to undertake primary responsibility for complying with regulations, but failure to comply could result in fines by governmental authorities, awards of damages to private litigants, or restrictions on the ability to conduct business on such properties.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Carefully consider the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. If any of the events or developments described below were actually to occur, NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.
Financial and economic conditions may have an adverse impact on NNN, its tenants, and commercial real estate in general.
Financial and economic conditions continue to be challenging and volatile and any worsening of such conditions, including any disruption in the capital markets, could adversely affect NNN’s business and results of operations. Such conditions could also affect the financial condition of NNN’s tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or the institutions that hold NNN’s cash balances and short-term investments, which may expose NNN to increased risks of default by these parties.
There can be no assurance that actions of the United States Government, the Federal Reserve or other government and regulatory bodies intended to stabilize the economy or financial markets will achieve their intended effect. Additionally, some of these actions may adversely affect financial institutions, capital providers, retailers, consumers, NNN’s financial condition, NNN's results of operations or the trading price of NNN’s shares.
6
Potential consequences of challenging and volatile financial and economic conditions include:
•
the financial condition of NNN’s tenants may be adversely affected, which may result in tenant defaults under the leases due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failures or for other reasons,
•
the ability to borrow on terms and conditions that NNN finds acceptable may be limited or unavailable, which could reduce NNN’s ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt, reduce NNN’s returns from acquisition and development activities, reduce NNN’s ability to make cash distributions to its stockholders and increase NNN’s future interest expense,
•
the recognition of impairment charges on or reduced values of the Properties, may adversely affect NNN's results of operations,
•
reduced values of the Properties may limit NNN's ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices and reduce the availability of buyer financing, and
•
the value and liquidity of NNN’s short-term investments and cash deposits could be reduced as a result of (i) a deterioration of the financial condition of the institutions that hold NNN’s cash deposits or the institutions or assets in which NNN has made short-term investments, (ii) the dislocation of the markets for NNN’s short-term investments, (iii) increased volatility in market rates for such investments or (iv) other factors.
NNN may be unable to obtain debt or equity capital on favorable terms, if at all.
NNN may be unable to obtain capital on favorable terms, if at all, to further its business objectives or meet its existing obligations. Nearly all of NNN’s debt, including the Credit Facility, is subject to balloon principal payments due at maturity. These maturities range between 2017 and 2026. NNN's ability to make these scheduled principal payments may be adversely impacted by NNN’s inability to extend or refinance the Credit Facility, the inability to dispose of assets at an attractive price or the inability to obtain additional debt or equity capital. Capital that may be available may be materially more expensive or available under terms that are materially more restrictive which would have an adverse impact on NNN’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Loss of rent from tenants would reduce NNN’s cash flow.
NNN's tenants encounter significant macroeconomic, governmental and competitive forces. Adverse changes in consumer spending or consumer preferences for particular goods, services or store based retailing could severely impact their ability to pay rent. Shifts from in-store to online shopping could increase due to changing consumer shopping patterns as well as the increase in consumer adoption and use of mobile electronic devices. This expansion of e-commerce could have an adverse impact on NNN's tenants' ongoing viability. The default, financial distress, bankruptcy or liquidation of one or more of NNN’s tenants could cause substantial vacancies in the Property Portfolio. Vacancies reduce NNN’s revenues, increase property expenses and could decrease the value of each such vacant Property. Upon the expiration of a lease, the tenant may choose not to renew the lease and NNN may not be able to re-lease the vacant Property at a comparable lease rate. Furthermore, NNN may incur additional expenditures in connection with such renewal or re-leasing.
A significant portion of the Property Portfolio annual base rent is concentrated in specific industry classifications, tenants and geographic locations.
As of
December 31, 2016
, approximately,
•
48.6% of the Property Portfolio annual base rent is generated from tenants in five retail lines of trade, including convenience stores (16.9%) and full-service and limited-service restaurants (19.3%),
•
20.1% of the Property Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five tenants, including Sunoco (5.4%), Mister Car Wash (4.0%), LA Fitness (3.8%), AMC Theatres (3.5%), and Camping World (3.4%), and
•
43.6% of the Property Portfolio annual base rent is generated from properties located in five states, including Texas (18.4%) and Florida (9.1%).
Any financial hardship and/or economic changes in these lines of trade, tenants or states could have an adverse effect on NNN’s results of operations.
7
Owning real estate and indirect interests in real estate carries inherent risks.
NNN’s economic performance and the value of its real estate assets are subject to the risk that if the Properties do not generate revenues sufficient to meet its operating expenses, including debt service, NNN’s cash flow and ability to pay distributions to its stockholders will be adversely affected. As a real estate company, NNN is susceptible to the following real estate industry risks, which are beyond its control:
•
changes in national, regional and local economic conditions and outlook,
•
decreases in consumer spending and retail sales or adverse changes in consumer preferences for particular goods, services or store based retailing,
•
economic downturns in the areas where the Properties are located,
•
adverse changes in local real estate market conditions, such as an oversupply of space, reduction in demand for space, loss of a large employer, intense competition for tenants, or a demographic change,
•
changes in tenant or consumer preferences that reduce the attractiveness of the Properties to tenants,
•
changes in zoning, regulatory restrictions, or tax laws, and
•
changes in interest rates or availability of financing.
All of these factors could result in decreases in market rental rates and increases in vacancy rates, which could adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.
NNN’s real estate investments are illiquid.
Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, NNN’s ability to adjust the portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions is limited. Certain significant expenditures generally do not change in response to economic or other conditions, including: (i) debt service (if any), (ii) real estate taxes, and (iii) operating and maintenance costs. This combination of variable revenue and relatively fixed expenditures may result, under certain market conditions, in reduced earnings and could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.
Costs of complying with changes in governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.
NNN cannot predict what laws or regulations will be enacted in the future, how future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted, or how future laws or regulations will affect NNN or its Properties, including, but not limited to environmental laws and regulations. Compliance with new laws or regulations, or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may require NNN, its retail tenants, or consumers to incur significant expenditures, impose significant liability, restrict or prohibit business activities and could cause a material adverse effect on NNN’s results of operation.
NNN may be subject to known or unknown environmental liabilities and hazardous materials on Properties owned by NNN.
There may be known or unknown environmental liabilities associated with properties owned or acquired in the future by NNN. Certain particular uses of some properties may also have a heightened risk of environmental liability because of the hazardous materials used in performing services on those properties, such as convenience stores with underground petroleum storage tanks or auto parts and auto service businesses using petroleum products, paint and machine solvents. Some of the Properties may contain asbestos or asbestos-containing materials, or may contain or may develop mold or other bio-contaminants. Asbestos-containing materials must be handled, managed and removed in accordance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations. Mold and other bio-contaminants can produce airborne toxins, may cause a variety of health issues in individuals and must be remediated in accordance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.
As part of its due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each property it acquires. In cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where evidence of some level of known contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the contamination in accordance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance. Although sellers or tenants may be contractually responsible for remediating hazardous materials on a property and may be responsible for indemnifying NNN for any liability resulting from the use of a property and for any failure to comply with any applicable environmental laws, rules or regulations, NNN has no assurance that sellers or tenants shall be able to meet their remediation and indemnity obligations to NNN. A tenant or seller may not have the financial ability to meet its remediation and indemnity obligations to NNN when required. Furthermore, NNN may have strict liability to governmental agencies or third parties as a result of the existence of hazardous materials on Properties, whether or not NNN knew about or caused such hazardous materials to exist.
8
As of
February 6, 2017
, NNN has
76
Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation and/or monitoring. In general, the seller, a previous owner, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Properties.
If NNN is responsible for hazardous materials located on its Properties, NNN’s liability may include investigation and remediation costs, property damage to third parties, personal injury to third parties, and governmental fines and penalties. Furthermore, the presence of hazardous materials on a Property may adversely impact the Property value or NNN’s ability to sell the Property. Significant environmental liability could impact NNN’s results of operations, ability to make distributions to stockholders, and its ability to meet its debt obligations.
In order to mitigate exposure to environmental liability, NNN maintains an environmental insurance policy which provides some coverage for substantially all of its Properties. That policy expires in August 2018. However, the policy is subject to exclusions and limitations and does not cover all of the Properties owned by NNN. For those Properties covered under the policy, insurance may not fully compensate NNN for any environmental liability. NNN has no assurance that the insurer on its environmental insurance policy will be able to meet its obligations under the policy. NNN may not desire to renew the environmental insurance policy in place upon expiration or a replacement policy may not be available at a reasonable cost, if at all.
NNN may not be able to successfully execute its acquisition or development strategies.
NNN may not be able to implement its investment strategies successfully. Additionally, NNN cannot assure that its Property Portfolio will expand at all, or if it will expand at any specified rate or to any specified size. In addition, investment in additional real estate assets is subject to a number of risks. Because NNN expects to invest in markets other than the ones in which its current Properties are located or properties which may be leased to tenants other than those to which NNN has historically leased properties, NNN will also be subject to the risks associated with investment in new markets or with new tenants that may be relatively unfamiliar to NNN’s management team.
NNN’s development activities are subject to, without limitation, risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory approvals, the cost and timely completion of construction (including risks from factors beyond NNN’s control, such as weather or labor conditions or material shortages), the risk of finding tenants for the properties and the ability to obtain both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken or provide a tenant the opportunity to reduce rent or terminate a lease. Any of these situations may delay or eliminate proceeds or cash flows NNN expects from these projects, which could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.
NNN may not be able to dispose of properties consistent with its operating strategy.
NNN may be unable to sell properties targeted for disposition due to adverse market conditions. This may adversely affect, among other things, NNN’s ability to sell under favorable terms, execute its operating strategy, achieve target earnings or returns, retire or repay debt or pay dividends.
NNN may suffer a loss in the event of a default of or bankruptcy of a borrower or a tenant.
As of
December 31, 2016
, mortgages and notes receivables had an outstanding principal balance of
$1,252,000
. If a borrower defaults on a mortgage or other loan made by NNN, and does not have sufficient assets to satisfy the loan, NNN may suffer a loss of principal and interest. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN may not be able to recover against all or any of the assets of the borrower, or the collateral may not be sufficient to satisfy the balance due on the loan. In addition, certain of NNN’s loans may be subordinate to other debt of a borrower. These investments are typically loans secured by a borrower’s pledge of its ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets and are typically subordinated to senior loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans. If a borrower defaults on the debt senior to NNN’s loan, or in the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN’s loan will be satisfied only after the borrower’s senior creditors’ claims are satisfied. Where debt senior to NNN’s loans exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit NNN’s ability to amend loan documents, assign the loans, accept prepayments, exercise remedies and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. Bankruptcy proceedings and litigation can significantly increase the time needed for NNN to acquire underlying collateral, if any, in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value. In addition, there are significant costs and delays associated with the foreclosure process.
9
Certain provisions of NNN’s leases or loan agreements may be unenforceable.
NNN’s rights and obligations with respect to its leases, mortgage loans or other loans are governed by written agreements. A court could determine that one or more provisions of such an agreement are unenforceable, such as a particular remedy, a master lease covenant, a loan prepayment provision or a provision governing NNN’s security interest in the underlying collateral of a borrower or lessee. NNN could be adversely impacted if this were to happen with respect to an asset or group of assets.
Property ownership through joint ventures and partnerships could limit NNN’s control of those investments.
Joint ventures or partnerships involve risks not otherwise present for direct investments by NNN. It is possible that NNN’s co-venturers or partners may have different interests or goals than NNN at any time and they may take actions contrary to NNN’s requests, policies or objectives, including NNN’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. Other risks of joint venture or partnership investments include impasses on decisions because in some instances no single co-venturer or partner has full control over the joint venture or partnership, respectively, or the co-venturer or partner may become insolvent, bankrupt or otherwise unable to contribute to the joint venture or partnership, respectively. Further, disputes may develop with a co-venturer or partner over decisions affecting the property, joint venture or partnership that may result in litigation, arbitration or some other form of dispute resolution.
Competition from numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors may impede NNN’s ability to grow.
NNN may not complete suitable property acquisitions or developments on advantageous terms, if at all, due to competition for such properties with others engaged in real estate investment activities or lack of properties for sale on terms deemed acceptable to NNN. NNN’s inability to successfully acquire or develop new properties may affect NNN’s ability to achieve anticipated return on investment or realize its investment strategy, which could have an adverse effect on its results of operations.
NNN's loss of key management personnel could adversely affect performance and the value of its securities.
NNN is dependent on the efforts of its key management. Competition for senior management personnel can be intense and NNN may not be able to retain its key management. Although NNN believes qualified replacements could be found for any departures of key management, the loss of their services could adversely affect NNN's performance and the value of its securities.
On September 29, 2016, NNN announced that, as the culmination of its long-term executive succession planning process, Craig Macnab, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chairman of NNN's Board of Directors, will retire as CEO and step down as Chairman and a member of NNN's Board of Directors effective April 28, 2017. Julian E. (“Jay”) Whitehurst, currently President and Chief Operating Officer, will assume the role of President and CEO as of April 28, 2017.
Uninsured losses may adversely affect NNN’s operating results and asset values.
The Properties are generally covered by comprehensive liability, fire, and extended insurance coverage. NNN believes that the insurance carried on its Properties is adequate and in accordance with industry standards. There are, however, types of losses (such as from hurricanes, floods, earthquakes or other types of natural disasters or wars or other acts of violence) which may be uninsurable, self-insured by tenants, or the cost of insuring against these losses may not be economically justifiable in the opinion of tenants or NNN. If an uninsured loss occurs or a loss exceeds policy limits, NNN could lose both its invested capital and anticipated revenues from the property, thereby reducing NNN’s cash flow and asset value.
Acts of violence, terrorist attacks or war may affect the markets in which NNN operates and NNN’s results of operations.
Terrorist attacks or other acts of violence may negatively affect NNN’s operations. There can be no assurance that there will not be terrorist attacks against businesses within the United States. These attacks may directly or indirectly impact NNN’s physical facilities or the businesses or the financial condition of its tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or financial institutions with which NNN has a relationship. The United States is engaged in armed conflict, which could have an impact on these parties. The consequences of armed conflict are unpredictable, and NNN may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on its business or be insured for such.
More generally, any of these events or threats of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and worldwide financial markets and economies. They also could result in, or
10
cause a deepening of, economic recession in the United States or abroad. Any of these occurrences could have an adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition or results of operations.
Vacant properties or bankrupt tenants or borrowers could adversely affect NNN’s business or financial condition.
As of
December 31, 2016
, NNN owned
27
vacant, un-leased Properties, which accounted for approximately
one
percent of total Properties held in the Property Portfolio. NNN is actively marketing these properties for sale or lease but may not be able to sell or lease these properties on favorable terms or at all. The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from the rejection by any bankrupt tenant of any of their respective leases with NNN could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations of NNN if NNN is unable to re-lease the Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of
January 31, 2017
, less than
one
percent of the total gross leasable area of the Property Portfolio was leased to tenants that have filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and have the right to reject or affirm their leases with NNN.
The amount of debt NNN has and the restrictions imposed by that debt could adversely affect NNN’s business and financial condition.
As of
December 31, 2016
, NNN had outstanding debt including mortgages payable of
$13,878,000
, total unsecured notes payable of
$2,297,811,000
and
zero
outstanding on the Credit Facility. NNN’s organizational documents do not limit the level or amount of debt that it may incur. If NNN incurs additional indebtedness and permits a higher degree of leverage, debt service requirements would increase and could adversely affect NNN’s financial condition and results of operations, as well as NNN’s ability to pay principal and interest on the outstanding indebtedness or cash dividends to its stockholders. In addition, increased leverage could increase the risk that NNN may default on its debt obligations.
The amount of debt outstanding at any time could have important consequences to NNN’s stockholders. For example, it could:
•
require NNN to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, real estate investments and other business opportunities that may arise in the future,
•
increase NNN’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions,
•
limit NNN’s ability to obtain any additional financing it may need in the future for working capital, debt refinancing, capital expenditures, real estate investments, development or other general corporate purposes,
•
make it difficult to satisfy NNN’s debt service requirements,
•
limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends in cash on its outstanding common and preferred stock,
•
limit NNN’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the factors that affect the profitability of its business, and
•
limit NNN’s flexibility in conducting its business, which may place NNN at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt or debt with less restrictive terms.
NNN’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal or interest on its debt, or to retire or refinance such debt will depend primarily on its future performance, which to a certain extent is subject to the creditworthiness of its tenants, competition, and economic, financial, and other factors beyond its control. There can be no assurance that NNN’s business will continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service its debt or meet its other cash needs. If NNN is unable to generate sufficient cash flow from its business, it may be required to refinance all or a portion of its existing debt, sell assets or obtain additional financing to meet its debt obligations and other cash needs.
NNN cannot assure stockholders that any such refinancing, sale of assets or additional financing would be possible or, if possible, on terms and conditions, including but not limited to the interest rate, which NNN would find acceptable or would not result in a material decline in earnings.
11
NNN is obligated to comply with financial and other covenants in its debt instruments that could restrict its operating activities, and the failure to comply with such covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment of such debt.
As of
December 31, 2016
, NNN had approximately
$2,311,689,000
of outstanding indebtedness, of which approximately
$13,878,000
was secured indebtedness. NNN’s unsecured debt instruments contain various restrictive covenants which include, among others, provisions restricting NNN’s ability to:
•
incur or guarantee additional debt,
•
make certain distributions, investments and other restricted payments,
•
enter into transactions with certain affiliates,
•
create certain liens,
•
consolidate, merge or sell NNN’s assets, and
•
pre-pay debt.
NNN’s secured debt instruments generally contain customary covenants, including, among others, provisions:
•
requiring the maintenance of the property securing the debt,
•
restricting its ability to sell, assign or further encumber the properties securing the debt,
•
restricting its ability to incur additional debt on the property securing the debt,
•
restricting modifications to property improvements,
•
restricting its ability to amend or modify existing leases on the property securing the debt, and
•
establishing certain prepayment restrictions.
In addition, NNN’s debt instruments may contain cross-default provisions, in which case a default of NNN under one debt instrument will be a default of NNN under multiple or all debt instruments of NNN.
NNN’s ability to meet some of its debt covenants, including covenants related to the condition of the property or payment of real estate taxes, may be dependent on the performance by NNN’s tenants under their leases.
In addition, certain covenants in NNN’s debt instruments, including its Credit Facility, require NNN, among other things, to:
•
limit certain leverage ratios,
•
maintain certain minimum interest and debt service coverage ratios, and
•
limit investments in certain types of assets.
NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.
The market value of NNN’s equity and debt securities is subject to various factors that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility.
As with other publicly traded securities, the market price of NNN’s equity and debt securities depends on various factors, which may change from time-to-time and/or may be unrelated to NNN’s financial condition, operating performance or prospects that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility in such prices. These factors, among others, include:
•
general economic and financial market conditions,
•
level and trend of interest rates,
•
changes in government taxation or regulatory authorities,
•
NNN’s ability to access the capital markets to raise additional capital,
•
the issuance of additional equity or debt securities,
•
changes in NNN’s funds from operations or earnings estimates,
•
changes in NNN’s debt ratings or analyst ratings,
•
NNN’s financial condition and performance,
•
market perception of NNN compared to other REITs, and
•
market perception of REITs compared to other investment sectors.
12
NNN’s failure to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes could result in significant tax liability.
NNN intends to operate in a manner that will allow NNN to continue to qualify as a REIT. NNN believes it has been organized as, and its past and present operations qualify NNN as a REIT. However, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) could successfully assert that NNN is not qualified as such. In addition, NNN may not remain qualified as a REIT in the future. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within NNN’s control. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for NNN to qualify as a REIT or avoid significant tax liability.
If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT, it would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to stockholders in computing taxable income and would become subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. In this event, NNN could be subject to potentially significant tax liabilities and penalties. Unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, NNN would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the qualification was lost.
Even if NNN remains qualified as a REIT, NNN faces other tax liabilities that reduce operating results and cash flow.
Even if NNN remains qualified for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease earnings and cash available for distribution to stockholders. In addition, in order to meet the REIT qualification requirements, NNN has owned some of its assets in the TRS.
Adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes could reduce NNN’s earnings and cash flow and the market value of NNN’s securities.
At any time, the federal and state income tax laws or the administrative interpretations of those laws may change. Any such changes may have current and retroactive effects, and could adversely affect NNN or its stockholders. Legislation could cause shares in non-REIT corporations to be a more attractive investment to individual investors than shares in REITs, and could have an adverse effect on the value of NNN’s securities.
Compliance with REIT requirements, including distribution requirements, may limit NNN’s flexibility and may negatively affect NNN’s operating decisions.
To maintain its status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, NNN must meet certain requirements on an on-going basis, including requirements regarding its sources of income, the nature and diversification of its assets, the amounts NNN distributes to its stockholders and the ownership of its shares. NNN may also be required to make distributions to its stockholders when it does not have funds readily available for distribution or at times when NNN’s funds are otherwise needed to fund expenditures or debt service requirements. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, so long as it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2016
, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.
Changes in accounting pronouncements could adversely impact NNN’s or NNN’s tenants’ reported financial performance.
Accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how NNN records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. From time to time the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the Commission, who create and interpret appropriate accounting standards, may change the financial accounting and reporting standards or their interpretation and application of these standards that govern the preparation of NNN’s financial statements. These changes could have a material impact on NNN’s reported financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, NNN could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in restating prior period financial statements. Similarly, these changes could have a material impact on NNN’s tenants’ reported financial condition or results of operations and affect their preferences regarding leasing real estate.
NNN’s failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results and the market value of NNN's securities.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. If NNN fails to maintain the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting, as such standards may be modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, NNN may not be able to ensure that it can
13
conclude on an ongoing basis that it has effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Moreover, effective internal control over financial reporting, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for NNN to produce reliable financial reports and to maintain its qualification as a REIT and are important in helping to prevent financial fraud. If NNN cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its business and operating results could be harmed, REIT qualification could be jeopardized, investors could lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information, the company's access to capital could be impaired, and the trading price of NNN’s shares could drop significantly.
NNN’s ability to pay dividends in the future is subject to many factors.
NNN’s ability to pay dividends may be impaired if any of the risks described in this section were to occur. In addition, payment of NNN’s dividends depends upon NNN’s earnings, financial condition, maintenance of NNN’s REIT status and other factors as NNN’s Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time.
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents could adversely affect NNN's business, disrupt operations and expose NNN to liabilities to tenants, employees, capital providers, and other third parties.
Cyber incidents can result from deliberate attacks or unintentional events. These incidents can include, but are not limited to, gaining unauthorized access to digital systems for purposes of misappropriating assets or sensitive information, corrupting data, or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents could include, but are not limited to, disrupted operations, misstated financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection costs, litigation and reputational damage adversely affecting customer or investor confidence. These cyber incidents could negatively impact NNN, NNN's tenants and/or the capital markets.
Future investment in international markets could subject NNN to additional risks.
If NNN expands its operating strategy to include investment in international markets, NNN could face additional risks, including foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, operational risks due to local economic and political conditions and laws and policies of the U.S. affecting foreign investment.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2.
Properties
Please refer to Item 1. “Business.”
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various legal actions that management believes are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management does not believe that any of these proceedings are material.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
14
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The common stock of NNN currently is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “NNN.” Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on NNN’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity Index (“NAREIT”) and the S&P 500 Index (“S&P”) for the five-year period commencing
December 31, 2011
and ending
December 31, 2016
. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on
December 31, 2011
.
Comparison to Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
15
Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on NNN’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity Index (“NAREIT”) and the S&P 500 Index (“S&P”) for the ten-year period commencing December 31, 2006 and ending
December 31, 2016
. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2006.
Comparison to Ten-Year Cumulative Total Return
16
For each calendar quarter and year indicated, the following table reflects respective high, low and closing sales prices for the common stock as quoted by the NYSE and the dividends paid per share in each such period.
2016
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Year
High
$
46.86
$
51.72
$
53.60
$
51.26
$
53.60
Low
38.29
43.52
47.76
39.86
38.29
Close
46.20
51.72
50.85
44.20
44.20
Dividends paid per share
0.435
0.435
0.455
0.455
1.780
2015
High
$
44.43
$
42.11
$
38.91
$
40.37
$
44.43
Low
38.60
34.86
33.62
35.51
33.62
Close
40.97
35.01
36.27
40.05
40.05
Dividends paid per share
0.420
0.420
0.435
0.435
1.710
The following table presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:
2016
2015
Ordinary dividends
$
1.513705
85.0396
%
$
1.363294
79.7248
%
Qualified dividends
—
—
0.019005
1.1114
%
Capital gain
—
—
0.007806
0.4565
%
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain
—
—
0.011055
0.6465
%
Nontaxable distributions
0.266295
14.9604
%
0.308840
18.0608
%
$
1.780000
100.0000
%
$
1.710000
100.0000
%
NNN intends to pay regular quarterly dividends to its stockholders, although all future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, NNN’s financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.
In January 2017
, NNN declared dividends payable to its stockholders of
$66,780,000
, or
$0.455
per share, of common stock.
On January 31, 2017, there were 1,800 stockholders of record of NNN's common stock.
17
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
Historical Financial Highlights
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Gross revenues
(1)
$
533,817
$
483,025
$
435,278
$
397,008
$
342,057
Earnings from continuing operations
212,324
187,511
179,777
154,006
132,388
Earnings including noncontrolling interests
239,506
197,961
191,170
160,085
141,937
Net earnings attributable to NNN
239,500
197,836
190,601
160,145
142,015
Total assets
6,334,151
5,460,044
4,915,551
4,445,308
3,980,210
Total debt
2,311,689
1,975,944
1,729,891
1,560,844
1,579,148
Total stockholders’ equity of NNN
3,916,799
3,342,134
3,082,515
2,777,045
2,296,285
Cash dividends declared to:
Common stockholders
257,007
228,699
204,157
189,107
167,495
Series C preferred stockholders
—
—
—
—
1,979
Series D preferred stockholders
19,047
19,047
19,047
19,047
15,449
Series E preferred stockholders
16,387
16,387
16,387
8,876
—
Series F preferred stockholders
3,189
—
—
—
—
Weighted average common shares:
Basic
144,176,224
133,998,674
124,257,558
118,204,148
106,965,156
Diluted
144,660,633
134,489,416
124,710,226
119,864,824
109,117,515
Per share information:
Earnings from continuing operations:
Basic
$
1.39
$
1.21
$
1.24
$
1.06
$
1.04
Diluted
1.38
1.20
1.24
1.05
1.02
Net earnings:
Basic
1.39
1.21
1.24
1.11
1.13
Diluted
1.38
1.20
1.24
1.10
1.11
Cash dividends declared to:
Common stockholders
1.78
1.71
1.65
1.60
1.56
Series C preferred depositary stockholders
—
—
—
—
0.537760
Series D preferred depositary stockholders
1.656250
1.656250
1.656250
1.656250
1.343403
Series E preferred depositary stockholders
1.425000
1.425000
1.425000
0.771875
—
Series F preferred depositary stockholders
0.231111
—
—
—
—
Other data:
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities
$
415,337
$
341,095
$
296,733
$
274,421
$
228,130
Investing activities
(779,943
)
(644,544
)
(541,558
)
(568,040
)
(601,759
)
Financing activities
644,886
307,105
253,944
293,028
373,623
Funds from operations – available to common stockholders
(2)
330,544
289,193
260,902
228,622
193,563
(1)
Gross revenues include revenues from NNN’s continuing and discontinued operations. Prior to January 1, 2014, in accordance with FASB guidance on Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, NNN classified the revenues related to (i) all Properties which generated revenue that were sold and a leasehold interest which expired and (ii) all Properties which generated revenue and were held for sale at December 31, 2013, as discontinued operations. Effective January 1, 2014, NNN early adopted ASU 2014-08, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposal of Components of an Entity.” Therefore, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations are to be presented as discontinued operations. This requires the Company to continue to classify any Property disposal or Property classified as
18
held for sale as of December 31, 2013, as discontinued operations prospectively. Therefore, the revenues and expenses related to these properties are presented as discontinued operations as of December 31, 2014. The Company has not classified any additional properties as discontinued operations subsequent to December 31, 2013.
(2)
The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) developed Funds from Operations (“FFO”) as a relative non-U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) financial measure of performance of a REIT in order to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined under GAAP. FFO is defined by NAREIT and is used by NNN as follows: net earnings (computed in accordance with GAAP) plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, excluding gains (or losses) on the disposition of certain assets, any impairment charges on a depreciable real estate asset and NNN’s share of these items from NNN’s unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
Funds From Operations (FFO) Reconciliation
FFO is generally considered by industry analysts to be an appropriate measure of operating performance of real estate companies. FFO does not necessarily represent cash provided by operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of NNN’s operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Management considers FFO an appropriate measure of operating performance of an equity REIT because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of the real estate assets diminishes
predictably over time, and because industry analysts have accepted it as an operating performance measure. NNN’s computation of FFO may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO used by other equity REITs, and therefore, may not be comparable to such other REITs.
The following table reconciles FFO to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net earnings for the years ended December 31:
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Net earnings available to common stockholders
$
200,877
$
162,402
$
155,167
$
132,222
$
121,489
Real estate depreciation and amortization:
Continuing operations
148,779
134,380
115,888
99,048
73,685
Discontinued operations
—
—
3
343
1,381
Joint venture real estate depreciation
—
—
—
—
112
Joint venture gain on disposition of real estate
—
—
—
—
(2,341
)
Gain on disposition of real estate, net of income tax and noncontrolling interests
(27,137
)
(10,397
)
(10,904
)
(5,442
)
(10,956
)
Impairment losses – depreciable real estate, net of recoveries and income tax
8,025
2,808
748
2,451
10,193
FFO available to common stockholders
$
330,544
$
289,193
$
260,902
$
228,622
$
193,563
For a discussion of material events affecting the comparability of the information reflected in the selected financial data, refer to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
19
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with "Item 6. Selected Financial Data," and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the forward-looking disclaimer language in italics before "Item 1. Business."
The term "NNN" or the "Company" refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN may elect to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the "TRS." At the close of business on December 31, 2015, NNN elected to revoke its election to classify the TRS as taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS Revocation Election").
Overview
NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust ("REIT") formed in 1984. NNN's assets include: real estate assets and mortgages and notes receivable. NNN acquires, owns, invests in and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment ("Properties," "Property Portfolio," or individually a "Property").
NNN owned
2,535
Properties, with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately
27,204,000
square feet, located in
48
states, with a weighted average remaining lease term of
11.6
years as of
December 31, 2016
. Approximately
99
percent of the Properties were leased as of
December 31, 2016
.
NNN’s management team focuses on certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN include items such as: the composition of the Property Portfolio (such as tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of the Property Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios and profitability measures, and industry trends and performance compared to that of NNN.
NNN evaluates the creditworthiness of its current and prospective tenants. This evaluation includes reviewing available financial statements, store level financial performance, press releases, public credit ratings from major credit rating agencies, industry news publications and financial market data (debt and equity pricing). NNN also evaluates the tenant's business and operations, including periodically meeting with senior management of certain tenants.
NNN continues to maintain its diversification by tenant, geography and tenant’s line of trade. NNN’s largest lines of trade concentrations are the convenience store and restaurant (including full and limited service) sectors. These sectors represent a large part of the freestanding retail property marketplace and NNN’s management believes these sectors present attractive investment opportunities. The Property Portfolio is geographically concentrated in the south and southeast United States, which are regions of historically above-average population growth. Given these concentrations, any financial hardship within these sectors or geographic regions, respectively, could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and operating performance of NNN.
As of the years ended December 31,
2016
,
2015
and
2014
, the Property Portfolio has remained at least 99 percent leased. As of
December 31, 2016
, the average remaining lease term of the Property Portfolio was
11.6
years, which is consistent with the past three years, coupled with a net lease structure, provides enhanced probability of maintaining occupancy and operating earnings.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements in conformance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as other disclosures in the financial statements. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and assumptions; however, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, which in turn could have a material impact on NNN’s financial statements. A summary of NNN’s accounting policies and procedures are included in Note 1 of NNN’s consolidated financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements.
Real Estate Portfolio.
NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed or funded by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.
20
Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease
. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases, and based in each case on their fair values. Acquisition and closing costs incurred on the acquisition of real estate with an in-place lease is expensed as incurred and recorded as real estate acquisition costs.
Impairment – Real Estate.
Based upon certain events or changes in circumstances, management periodically assesses its Properties for possible impairment whenever the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions or the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant in a reasonable period of time. Management evaluates whether an impairment in carrying value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying value of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value.
Real Estate – Held For Sale.
Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell.
Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, at Fair Value
. Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value.
Revenue Recognition
. Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant. Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance on accounting for leases, based on the terms of the lease of the leased asset.
NNN's real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the Property, generally including property taxes, insurance, maintenance, utilities, repairs and capital expenditures. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:
Operating method
– Properties with leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rental revenue varies during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.
Direct financing method
– Properties with leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the Property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.
New Accounting Pronouncements.
Refer to Note 1 of the
December 31, 2016
, Consolidated Financial Statements.
Use of Estimates.
Additional critical accounting policies of NNN include management’s estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Additional critical accounting policies include management’s estimates of the useful lives used in calculating depreciation expense relating to real estate assets, the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including the commercial mortgage residual interests, and the collectibility of receivables from tenants, including accrued rental income. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
21
Results of Operations
Property Analysis
General.
The following table summarizes the Property Portfolio as of December 31:
2016
2015
2014
Properties Owned:
Number
2,535
2,257
2,054
Total gross leasable area (square feet)
27,204,000
24,964,000
22,479,000
Properties:
Leased and unimproved land
2,508
2,236
2,025
Percent of Properties – leased and unimproved land
99
%
99
%
99
%
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
11.6
11.4
11.6
Total gross leasable area (square feet) – leased
26,700,000
24,544,000
21,938,000
The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of the Property Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of
December 31, 2016
:
% of
Annual
Base Rent
(1)
# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
% of
Annual
Base Rent
(1)
# of
Properties
Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
2017
1.2%
27
502,000
2023
2.5%
85
1,014,000
2018
3.2%
90
1,153,000
2024
2.6%
50
883,000
2019
3.0%
76
1,122,000
2025
5.0%
132
1,116,000
2020
3.8%
132
1,571,000
2026
6.0%
181
1,830,000
2021
4.4%
122
1,320,000
Thereafter
62.2%
1,495
14,733,000
2022
6.1%
111
1,456,000
(1)
Based on the annualized base rent for all leases in place as of
December 31, 2016
.
(2)
Approximate square feet.
The following table summarizes the diversification of the Property Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:
% of Annual Base Rent
(1)
Top 10 Lines of Trade
2016
2015
2014
1.
Convenience stores
16.9%
16.7%
18.0%
2.
Restaurants - full service
11.8%
11.0%
9.1%
3.
Restaurants - limited service
7.5%
7.2%
6.5%
4.
Automotive service
6.6%
7.0%
7.2%
5.
Family entertainment centers
5.8%
5.6%
5.1%
6.
Health and fitness
5.7%
3.8%
3.9%
7.
Theaters
4.9%
5.2%
5.2%
8.
Automotive parts
3.9%
4.2%
4.7%
9.
Recreational vehicle dealers, parts and accessories
3.4%
3.6%
3.1%
10.
Banks
3.1%
3.4%
3.7%
Other
30.4%
32.3%
33.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
(1)
Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.
22
The following table summarizes the diversification of the Property Portfolio by state as of
December 31, 2016
:
State
# of Properties
% of Annual Base Rent
(1)
1.
Texas
448
18.4%
2.
Florida
197
9.1%
3.
Illinois
132
5.7%
4.
Ohio
165
5.7%
5.
North Carolina
134
4.7%
6.
Georgia
118
4.3%
7.
Indiana
118
4.2%
8.
Virginia
88
3.5%
9.
Alabama
101
3.0%
10.
Tennessee
77
2.8%
Other
957
38.6%
2,535
100.0%
(1)
Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of
December 31, 2016
.
Property Acquisitions.
The following table summarizes the Property acquisitions for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Acquisitions:
Number of Properties
313
221
221
Gross leasable area (square feet)
2,734,000
2,706,000
2,417,000
Initial cash yield
6.9
%
7.2
%
7.5
%
Total dollars invested
(1)
$
846,906
$
726,303
$
618,145
(1)
Includes dollars invested in projects under construction or tenant improvements for each respective year.
NNN typically funds Property acquisitions either through borrowings under NNN's unsecured revolving credit facility (the "Credit Facility") or by issuing its debt or equity securities in the capital markets.
Property Dispositions.
The following table summarizes the Properties sold by NNN for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Number of properties
38
19
27
Gross leasable area (square feet)
490,000
232,000
317,000
Net sales proceeds
$
103,215
$
39,116
$
55,378
Gain, net of income tax expense
(1)
$
27,182
$
10,450
$
11,424
Cap rate
6.8
%
5.9
%
7.2
%
(1)
Amounts include deferred gains on previously sold properties.
NNN typically uses the proceeds from a Property disposition to either pay down the Credit Facility or reinvest in real estate.
23
Analysis of Revenue from Continuing Operations
General.
During the year ended
December 31, 2016
, NNN’s rental income increased primarily due to the increase in rental income from Property acquisitions (See "Results of Operations – Property Analysis – Property Acquisitions"). NNN anticipates increases in rental income will continue to come from additional Property acquisitions and increases in rents pursuant to existing lease terms.
The following summarizes NNN’s revenues from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Percent of Total
2016
Versus
2015
Percent
2015
Versus
2014
Percent
2016
2015
2014
Rental Income
(1)
$
515,954
$
465,282
$
416,842
96.7
%
96.3
%
95.9
%
10.9
%
11.6
%
Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants
14,984
14,868
13,875
2.8
%
3.1
%
3.2
%
0.8
%
7.2
%
Interest and other income from real estate transactions
1,032
988
2,326
0.2
%
0.2
%
0.5
%
4.5
%
(57.5
)%
Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests
1,677
1,778
1,834
0.3
%
0.4
%
0.4
%
(5.7
)%
(3.1
)%
Total revenues from continuing operations
$
533,647
$
482,916
$
434,877
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
10.5
%
11.0
%
(1)
Includes rental income from operating leases, earned income from direct financing leases and percentage rent from continuing operations ("Rental Income").
Comparison of Revenues from Continuing Operations – 2016 versus 2015
Rental Income.
Rental Income increased in amount and as a percent of the total revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2016, is primarily due to a partial year of Rental Income received as a result of the acquisition of 313 properties with aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 2,734,000 during 2016 and a full year of Rental Income received as a result of the acquisition of 221 properties with a gross leasable area of approximately 2,706,000 square feet in 2015.
Comparison of Revenues from Continuing Operations – 2015 versus 2014
Rental Income.
Rental Income increased in amount and as a percent of the total revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2015, is primarily due to a partial year of Rental Income received as a result of the acquisition of 221 properties with aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 2,706,000 during 2015 and a full year of Rental Income received as a result of the acquisition of 221 properties with a gross leasable area of approximately 2,417,000 square feet in 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2015, NNN recorded $1,950,000 of rental revenue from a settlement with a prior tenant.
Real Estate Expense Reimbursement from Tenants.
Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants increased for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, but decreased as a percentage of total revenues from continuing operations for the same period. The increase is primarily attributable to a full year of reimbursements from properties acquired in 2014 and a partial year of reimbursements from certain newly acquired properties in 2015.
24
Analysis of Expenses from Continuing Operations
General.
Operating expenses from continuing operations increased primarily due to an increase in depreciation expense and an increase in impairments during the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015. The following summarizes NNN’s expenses from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
General and administrative
$
36,508
$
34,736
$
32,518
Real estate
20,852
19,776
18,935
Depreciation and amortization
149,101
134,798
116,162
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation
6,830
531
256
Impairment losses – real estate and other charges, net of recoveries
11,287
4,420
760
Total operating expenses
$
224,578
$
194,261
$
168,631
Interest and other income
$
(170
)
$
(109
)
$
(357
)
Interest expense
96,352
90,008
85,510
Real estate acquisition costs
563
927
1,391
Total other expenses (revenues)
$
96,745
$
90,826
$
86,544
Percentage of Total Expenses
Percentage of
Revenues from
Continuing Operations
2016
Versus
2015
Percent
2015
Versus
2014
Percent
2016
2015
2014
2016
2015
2014
General and administrative
16.3
%
17.9
%
19.3
%
6.9
%
7.2
%
7.5
%
5.1
%
6.8
%
Real estate
9.3
%
10.2
%
11.2
%
3.9
%
4.1
%
4.3
%
5.4
%
4.4
%
Depreciation and amortization
66.4
%
69.4
%
68.9
%
27.9
%
27.9
%
26.7
%
10.6
%
16.0
%
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation
3.0
%
0.3
%
0.2
%
1.3
%
0.1
%
0.1
%
1,186.3
%
107.4
%
Impairment losses – real estate and other charges, net of recoveries
5.0
%
2.2
%
0.4
%
2.1
%
0.9
%
0.2
%
155.4
%
481.6
%
Total operating expenses
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
42.1
%
40.2
%
38.8
%
15.6
%
15.2
%
Interest and other income
(0.2
)%
(0.1
)%
(0.4
)%
—
—
(0.1
)%
56.0
%
(69.5
)%
Interest expense
99.6
%
99.1
%
98.8
%
18.1
%
18.6
%
19.7
%
7.0
%
5.3
%
Real estate acquisition costs
0.6
%
1.0
%
1.6
%
0.1
%
0.2
%
0.3
%
(39.3
)%
(33.4
)%
Total other expenses (revenues)
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
18.2
%
18.8
%
19.9
%
6.5
%
4.9
%
Comparison of Expenses from Continuing Operations – 2016 versus 2015
General and Administrative Expenses.
General and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, but decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2016, is primarily attributable to an increase in personnel costs.
Real Estate.
Real estate expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, but decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase is primarily due to the increase in tenant reimbursable and non-reimbursable expenses related to a partial year of reimbursable and non-reimbursable expenses from certain properties acquired in 2016 and a full year of reimbursable and non-reimbursable expenses from certain properties acquired in 2015.
Depreciation and Amortization.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased in amount, decreased as a percentage of total operating expenses and remained flat as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in expenses is primarily due to the
25
acquisition of 313 properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 2,734,000 square feet in 2016 and 221 properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 2,706,000 square feet during 2015.
Impairment – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests Valuation.
As of December 31, 2015, NNN held the commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven loan securitizations. In 2016, the loan servicer of five of the securitizations exercised its clean-up call option. The clean-up call allowed the servicer to purchase all of the trusts’ assets, thereby terminating future cash distributions payable to NNN as the holder of these residual interests. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders' equity and other than temporary valuation impairment. As of December 31, 2016, the remaining two Residuals are recorded at fair value. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, NNN recorded other than temporary valuation impairments as a reduction of earnings from operations of $6,830,000, $531,000 and $256,000. The other than temporary valuation impairment recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016 related primarily to the execution of the clean-up call option on the five securitizations.
Impairment Losses – Real Estate and Other Charges, Net of Recoveries.
NNN reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at a price that exceeds NNN's carrying value. Management evaluates whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, NNN recorded $8,025,000 and $3,970,000, respectively, of real estate impairments. NNN also recorded a $3,269,000 loss on mortgages receivable for the year ended December 31, 2016, and a $450,000 loss on the sale of mortgages receivable during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Interest Expense.
Interest expense increased in total and as a percentage of total other expenses (revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015, and decreased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations.
The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:
(i)
the issuance in October 2015 of $400,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a maturity of November 2025, and stated interest rate of 4.000%,
(ii)
the repayment in December 2015 of $150,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a stated interest rate of 6.150%,
(iii)
the repayment in January 2016 of $5,876,000 principal amount of mortgages payable with an interest rate of 5.750%,
(iv)
the repayment in March 2016 of $722,000 principal amount of mortgages payable with an interest rate of 6.900%,
(v)
the repayment in October 2016 of $2,709,000 principal amount of mortgages payable with an interest rate of 6.400%,
(vi)
the issuance in December 2016 of $350,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a maturity of December 2026, and stated interest rate of 3.600%, and
(vii)
the decrease of $8,543,000 in the weighted average outstanding balance on the Credit Facility and a slightly higher weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015.
Comparison of Expenses from Continuing Operations – 2015 versus 2014
General and Administrative Expenses.
General and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, but decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015, is primarily attributable to an increase in incentive compensation.
Real Estate.
Real estate expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, but decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase is primarily due to the increase in tenant reimbursable expenses related to a partial year of reimbursable expenses from certain properties acquired in 2015 and a full year of reimbursable expenses from certain properties acquired in 2014.
26
Depreciation and Amortization.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased in amount and as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in expenses is primarily due to the acquisition of 221 properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 2,706,000 square feet in 2015 and 221 properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 2,417,000 square feet during 2014.
Impairment Losses – Real Estate and Other Charges, Net of Recoveries.
NNN reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at a price that exceeds NNN's carrying value. Management evaluates whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. During the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, NNN recorded $3,970,000 and $760,000, respectively, of real estate impairments. NNN also recorded a $450,000 loss on the sale of a mortgage receivable during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Interest Expense.
Interest expense increased in total and as a percentage of total other expenses (revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, and decreased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations.
The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:
(i)
the issuance in May 2014 of $350,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a maturity of June 2024, and stated interest rate of 3.900%,
(ii)
the repayment in June 2014 of $150,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a stated interest rate of 6.250%,
(iii)
the assumption of a mortgage in September 2014 of $2,824,000 in connection with a Property acquisition with an interest rate of 6.400%,
(iv)
the assumption of a mortgage in November 2014 of $14,430,000 in connection with the acquisition of Properties with an interest rate of 5.230%,
(v)
the issuance in October 2015 of $400,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a maturity of November 2025, and stated interest rate of 4.000%,
(vi)
the repayment in December 2015 of $150,000,000 principal amount of notes payable with a stated interest rate of 6.150%, and
(vii)
the increase of $22,092,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014, and a slightly lower weighted average interest rate for the year ended December 31, 2015, as compared to the same period in 2014.
Impact of Inflation
NNN’s leases typically contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on NNN’s results of operations. Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or, to a lesser extent, increases in the tenant’s sales volume. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent, rent increases will not keep up with the rate of inflation.
Properties are leased to tenants under long-term, net leases which typically require the tenant to pay certain operating expenses for a Property, thus, NNN’s exposure to inflation is reduced with respect to these expenses. Inflation may have an adverse impact on NNN’s tenants.
Liquidity
General
. NNN’s demand for funds has been and will continue to be primarily for (i) payment of operating expenses and cash dividends; (ii) Property acquisitions and development; (iii) capital expenditures; (iv) payment of principal and interest on its outstanding indebtedness; and (v) other investments.
NNN expects to meet short-term liquidity requirements through cash provided from operations and NNN’s Credit Facility. As of
December 31, 2016
, there was
no
outstanding balance and
$650,000,000
was available for future borrowings under the
27
Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling
$230,000
. NNN anticipates its long-term capital needs will be funded by the Credit Facility, cash provided from operations, the issuance of long-term debt or the issuance of common or preferred equity or other instruments convertible into or exchangeable for common or preferred equity. However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.
Cash and Cash Equivalents.
NNN's cash and cash equivalents includes the aggregate of Cash and cash equivalents and Restricted cash and cash held in escrow from the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The table below summarizes NNN’s cash flows for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Cash and cash equivalents:
Provided by operating activities
$
415,337
$
341,095
$
296,733
Used in investing activities
(779,943
)
(644,544
)
(541,558
)
Provided by financing activities
644,886
307,105
253,944
Increase
280,280
3,656
9,119
Net cash at beginning of year
14,260
10,604
1,485
Net cash at end of year
$
294,540
$
14,260
$
10,604
Cash provided by operating activities represents cash received primarily from Rental Income and interest income less cash used for general and administrative expenses. NNN’s cash flow from operating activities has been sufficient to pay the distributions for each period presented. The change in cash provided by operations for the
years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
, is primarily the result of changes in revenues and expenses as discussed in “Results of Operations.” Cash generated from operations is expected to fluctuate in the future.
Changes in cash for investing activities are primarily attributable to acquisitions and dispositions of Properties. NNN typically uses proceeds from its Credit Facility to fund the acquisition of its Properties.
NNN’s financing activities for the year ended December 31,
2016
, included the following significant transactions:
•
$334,103,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of 13,800,000 depositary shares representing interests in NNN's 5.200% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (the "Series F Preferred Stock") in October,
•
$342,765,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of the 3.600% notes payable in December,
•
$8,340,000
in net proceeds from the issuance of
187,626
shares of common stock in connection with the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”),
•
$265,696,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of 5,716,222 shares of common stock in connection with the at-the-market ("ATM") equity program,
•
$19,047,000
in dividends paid to holders of the depositary shares of NNN’s Series D Preferred Stock,
•
$
16,387,000
in dividends paid to holders of the depositary shares of NNN’s Series E Preferred Stock,
•
$3,189,000
in dividends paid to holders of the depositary shares of NNN’s Series F Preferred Stock, and
•
$257,007,000
in dividends paid to common stockholders.
Financing Strategy.
NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategy while servicing its debt requirements, maintaining its investment grade credit rating, staggering debt maturities and providing value to NNN’s stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, proceeds from the disposition of certain properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.
NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements, including investments in additional Properties, with cash from its Credit Facility. As of December 31,
2016
, there was
no
outstanding balance and
$650,000,000
was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling
$230,000
.
As of December 31,
2016
, NNN’s ratio of total debt to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation and amortization) was approximately
30
percent and the ratio of secured indebtedness to total gross assets was less than
one
percent. The ratio of total debt to total market capitalization was approximately
22
percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur additional debt under certain circumstances. The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy.
28
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
. The information in the following table summarizes NNN’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31,
2016
. The table presents principal cash flows by year-end of the expected maturity for debt obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31,
2016
.
Expected Maturity Date (dollars in thousands)
Total
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Long-term debt
(1)
$
2,338,452
$
250,510
$
538
$
567
$
596
$
300,630
$
1,785,611
Long-term debt – interest
(2)
606,083
96,958
83,323
83,294
83,265
75,668
183,575
Operating lease
6,462
728
743
758
773
788
2,672
Total contractual cash obligations
$
2,950,997
$
348,196
$
84,604
$
84,619
$
84,634
$
377,086
$
1,971,858
(1)
Includes only principal amounts outstanding under mortgages payable and notes payable and excludes unamortized mortgage premiums, note discounts and note costs.
(2)
Interest calculation based on stated rate of the principal amount.
In addition to the contractual obligations outlined above, NNN has committed to fund construction commitments on 21 Properties. The improvements are estimated to be completed within 12 months. These construction commitments, at December 31,
2016
, are outlined in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Total commitment
(1)
$
114,206
Amount funded
$
54,782
Remaining commitment
$
59,424
(1)
Includes land, construction costs, tenant improvements and lease costs.
As of December 31,
2016
, NNN did not have any other material contractual cash obligations, such as purchase obligations, financing lease obligations or other long-term liabilities other than those reflected in the table. In addition to items reflected in the table, NNN has issued preferred stock with cumulative preferential cash distributions, as described below under “Dividends.”
Management anticipates satisfying these obligations with a combination of NNN’s cash provided from operations, current capital resources on hand, its Credit Facility, debt or equity financings and asset dispositions.
Generally the Properties are leased under long-term net leases, which require the tenant to pay all property taxes and assessments, to maintain the interior and exterior of the property, and to carry property and liability insurance coverage. Therefore, management anticipates that capital demands to meet obligations with respect to these Properties will be modest for the foreseeable future and can be met with funds from operations and working capital. Certain of the Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for specific costs and expenses associated with the Property. Management anticipates the costs associated with the vacant Properties or those Properties that become vacant will also be met with funds from operations and working capital. NNN may be required to borrow under its Credit Facility or use other sources of capital in the event of significant capital expenditures.
The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from vacant Properties or uncollectibility of lease revenues could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations if NNN is unable to re-lease the Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of December 31,
2016
, NNN owned
27
vacant, un-leased Properties which accounted for approximately
one
percent of total Properties. Additionally, as of
January 31, 2017
, less than
one
percent of the total gross leasable area of the Property Portfolio was leased to tenants that have filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result, these tenants have the right to reject or affirm their leases with NNN.
Dividends.
NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, as amended, and related regulations and intends to continue to operate so as to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four years following the year during which qualification is lost. Such an event could materially adversely affect NNN’s income and ability to pay dividends.
29
One of NNN’s primary objectives, consistent with its policy of retaining sufficient cash for reserves and working capital purposes and maintaining its status as a REIT, is to distribute a substantial portion of its funds available from operations to its stockholders in the form of dividends.
The following table outlines the dividends declared and paid for NNN's common stock for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
2016
2015
2014
Dividends
$
257,007
$
228,699
$
204,157
Per share
1.780
1.710
1.650
The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:
2016
2015
2014
Ordinary dividends
$
1.513705
85.0396
%
$
1.363294
79.7248
%
$
1.306992
79.2116
%
Qualified dividends
—
—
0.019005
1.1114
%
0.006212
0.3765
%
Capital gain
—
—
0.007806
0.4565
%
0.008603
0.5214
%
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain
—
—
0.011055
0.6465
%
0.015362
0.9310
%
Nontaxable distributions
0.266295
14.9604
%
0.308840
18.0608
%
0.312831
18.9595
%
$
1.780000
100.0000
%
$
1.710000
100.0000
%
$
1.650000
100.0000
%
On
January 17, 2017
, NNN declared a dividend of
$0.455
per share, payable
February 15, 2017
to its common stockholders of record as of
January 31, 2017
.
Holders of NNN’s preferred stock issuances are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash distributions based on the stated rate and liquidation preference per annum. The following table outlines the dividends declared and paid for NNN's preferred stock for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
2016
2015
2014
Series D Preferred Stock
(1)
:
Dividends
$
19,047
$
19,047
$
19,047
Per share
1.656250
1.656250
1.656250
Series E Preferred Stock
(2)
:
Dividends
16,387
16,387
16,387
Per share
1.425000
1.425000
1.425000
Series F Preferred Stock
(3)
:
Dividends
3,189
—
—
Per share
0.231111
—
—
(1)
In January 2017, NNN called for redemption of all outstanding shares of its Series D Preferred Stock represented by depositary shares, each representing a 1/100th interest in a Series D Preferred Stock share. The depositary shares will be redeemed on February 23, 2017.
(2)
The Series E Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed by NNN. The earliest redemption date for the Series E Preferred Stock is May 2018.
(3)
The Series F Preferred Stock was issued October 11, 2016 and has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed by NNN. The earliest redemption date for the Series F preferred stock is October 2021.
30
The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such preferred stock dividends for the years ended December 31:
Ordinary dividends
Qualified dividends
Capital gain
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain
Totals
2016
Percentage of Total
100.0000%
—
—
—
100.0000
%
Series D
$1.656250
—
—
—
$
1.656250
Series E
$1.425000
—
—
—
$
1.425000
Series F
(1)
$0.231111
—
—
—
$
0.231111
2015
Percentage of Total
97.2400
%
1.4134
%
0.5570
%
0.7896
%
100.0000
%
Series D
$
1.610538
$
0.023409
$
0.009225
$
0.013078
$
1.656250
Series E
$
1.385670
$
0.020141
$
0.007937
$
0.011252
$
1.425000
2014
Percentage of Total
97.8035
%
0.4027
%
0.6440
%
1.1498
%
100.0000
%
Series D
$
1.619870
$
0.006670
$
0.010666
$
0.019044
$
1.656250
Series E
$
1.393700
$
0.005738
$
0.009177
$
0.016385
$
1.425000
(1)
The Series F Preferred Stock was issued in October 2016.
In January 2017, NNN called for redemption of all outstanding shares of its Series D Preferred Stock represented by depositary shares, each representing a 1/100th interest in a Series D Preferred Stock share. The depositary shares will be redeemed on February 23, 2017 at $25.00 per depositary share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends through the redemption date, for an aggregate redemption price of $25.3128472 per depositary share. After the redemption date, dividends on the depositary shares representing interests in the Series D Preferred Stock shares will cease to accrue.
Capital Resources
Generally, cash needs for Property acquisitions, debt payments, capital expenditures, development and other investments have been funded by equity and debt offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of Properties and, to a lesser extent, by internally generated funds. Cash needs for operating and interest expenses and dividends have generally been funded by internally generated funds. If available, future sources of capital include proceeds from the public or private offering of NNN’s debt or equity securities, secured or unsecured borrowings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of Properties, as well as undistributed funds from operations.
Debt
The following is a summary of NNN’s total outstanding debt as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2016
Percentage
of Total
2015
Percentage
of Total
Mortgages payable
$
13,878
0.6
%
$
23,964
1.2
%
Notes payable
2,297,811
99.4
%
1,951,980
98.8
%
Total outstanding debt
$
2,311,689
100.0
%
$
1,975,944
100.0
%
Indebtedness.
NNN expects to use indebtedness primarily for property acquisitions and development of single-tenant retail properties, either directly or through investment interests. Additionally, indebtedness may be used to refinance existing indebtedness.
31
Line of Credit Payable.
NNN's $650,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) had a weighted average outstanding balance of
$70,139,000
and a weighted average interest rate of
1.4%
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
. The Credit Facility matures
January 2019
, with an option to extend maturity to
January 2020
. As of
December 31, 2016
, the Credit Facility bears interest at
LIBOR plus 92.5
basis points; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN's debt rating. The Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature to increase the facility size up to
$1,000,000,000
. As of
December 31, 2016
, there was
no
outstanding balance and
$650,000,000
was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling
$230,000
.
In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage, and (iv) investment limitations. At
December 31, 2016
, NNN was in compliance with those covenants. In the event that NNN violates any of these restrictive financial covenants, it could cause the indebtedness under the Credit Facility to be accelerated and may impair NNN’s access to the debt and equity markets and limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends to its common and preferred stockholders, each of which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations.
Mortgages Payable.
The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):
Entered
(1)
Initial Balance
Interest
Rate
Maturity
(2)
Carrying
Value of
Encumbered
Asset(s)
(3)
Outstanding Principal
Balance at December 31,
2016
2015
February 2004
(6)
$
6,952
6.90%
January 2017
$
—
$
—
$
848
June 2012
(4)(5)
6,850
5.75%
April 2016
—
—
5,890
September 2014
(4)(7)
2,957
6.40%
February 2017
—
—
2,804
November 2014
(4)
15,151
5.23%
July 2023
21,403
13,987
14,555
$
21,403
13,987
24,097
Debt costs
(147
)
(226
)
Accumulated amortization
38
93
Debt costs, net of accumulated amortization
(109
)
(133
)
Mortgages payable, including unamortized premium and net of unamortized debt costs
$
13,878
$
23,964
(1)
Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan.
(2)
Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.
(3)
Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of the Properties. The carrying values of the assets at
December 31, 2016
.
(4)
Initial balance and outstanding principal balance includes unamortized premium.
(5)
NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance in January 2016.
(6)
NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance in March 2016.
(7)
NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance in October 2016.
32
Notes Payable.
Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes is summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Notes
(1)
Issue Date
Principal
Discount
(2)
Net
Price
Stated
Rate
Effective
Rate
(3)
Maturity
Date
2017
(4)
September 2007
$
250,000
$
877
$
249,123
6.875%
6.924%
October 2017
2021
(5)
July 2011
300,000
4,269
295,731
5.500%
5.689%
July 2021
2022
August 2012
325,000
4,989
320,011
3.800%
3.985%
October 2022
2023
(6)
April 2013
350,000
2,594
347,406
3.300%
3.388%
April 2023
2024
(7)
May 2014
350,000
707
349,293
3.900%
3.924%
June 2024
2025
(8)
October 2015
400,000
964
399,036
4.000%
4.029%
November 2025
2026
(9)
December 2016
350,000
3,860
346,140
3.600%
3.733%
December 2026
(1)
The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility, fund future property acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
(2)
The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.
(3)
Includes the effects of the discount at issuance.
(4)
NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of $3,260, of which $3,228 was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
(5)
NNN entered into two interest rate hedges with a total notional amount of $150,000. Upon issuance of the 2021 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreements resulting in a liability of $5,300, of which $5,218 was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
(6)
NNN entered into four forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $240,000. Upon issuance of the 2023 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a liability of $3,156, of which $3,141 was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
(7)
NNN entered into three forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $225,000. Upon issuance of the 2024 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a liability of $6,312, which was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
(8)
NNN entered into four forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $300,000. Upon issuance of the 2025 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a liability of $13,369, which was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
(9)
NNN entered into two forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of $180,000. Upon issuance of the 2026 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a gain of $13,345, which was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred asset is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
Each series of notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and is subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. The notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.
In connection with the outstanding note offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling
$21,157,000
consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.
In
December 2015
, NNN repaid the
$150,000,000
6.150%
notes payable that were due in
December 2015
.
In accordance with the terms of the indentures, pursuant to which NNN’s notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios, and (ii) certain interest coverage. At
December 31, 2016
, NNN was in compliance with those covenants. NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.
33
Debt and Equity Securities
NNN has used, and expects to use in the future, issuances of debt and equity securities primarily to pay down its outstanding indebtedness and to finance investment acquisitions. In February 2015, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) which was automatically effective and permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities.
A description of NNN’s outstanding series of publicly held notes is found under “Debt – Notes Payable” above.
NNN completed the following underwritten public offerings of cumulative redeemable preferred stock that are still outstanding ("Preferred Stock Shares") (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
Series
Dividend Rate
(1)
Issued
Depositary Shares Outstanding
(2)
Gross Proceeds
Stock Issuance Costs
(3)
Dividend Per Depositary Share
Earliest Redemption Date
(4)
Series D
(5)
6.625
%
February 2012
11,500,000
$
287,500
$
9,855
$
1.656250
February 2017
Series E
(6)
5.700
%
May 2013
11,500,000
287,500
9,856
1.425000
May 2018
Series F
(7)
5.200
%
October 2016
13,800,000
345,000
10,897
1.300000
October 2021
(1)
Holders are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends.
(2)
Representing 1/100th of a preferred share. Series D and E issuances each included 1,500,000 depositary shares in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment. Series F issuance included 1,800,000 depositary shares in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment.
(3)
Consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, rating agency fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.
(4)
NNN may redeem the preferred stock underlying the depositary shares at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends.
(5)
NNN used the net proceeds to redeem the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock for an aggregate redemption price of $92,000, excluding accumulated dividends of $283. NNN used the remainder of the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including repaying outstanding indebtedness under its Credit Facility.
(6)
NNN used the net proceeds from the offering for general corporate purposes and funding property acquisitions.
(7)
NNN used the net proceeds from the offering to repay outstanding indebtedness under its Credit Facility, fund property acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
The Preferred Stock Shares underlying the depositary shares rank senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Preferred Stock Shares have no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. In addition, upon a change of control, as defined in the articles supplementary fixing the rights and preferences of the Preferred Stock Shares, NNN may redeem the Preferred Stock Shares underlying the depositary shares at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends, and in limited circumstances the holders of depositary shares may convert some or all of their Preferred Stock Shares into shares of NNN's common stock at conversion rates provided in the related articles supplementary. As of February 13, 2017, the Series E and Series F Preferred Stock Shares were not redeemable or convertible.
In January 2017, NNN announced the redemption of all outstanding depositary shares representing interests in its Series D Preferred Stock. The depositary shares will be redeemed on February 23, 2017 at $25.00 per depositary share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends through the redemption date, for an aggregate redemption price of $25.3128472 per depositary share. After the redemption date, dividends on the depositary shares representing interests in the Series D Preferred Stock will cease to accrue.
Common Stock Issuances.
In November 2014, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2012 shelf registration statement and issued 5,462,500 shares (including 712,500 shares in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment) of common stock at a price of $38.16 per share and received net proceeds of $199,961,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $8,488,000, consisting primarily of underwriters' fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses. The Company used the net proceeds from this offering to repay outstanding indebtedness under the Credit Facility, to fund property acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
34
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.
In
February 2015
, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission for its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”) which permits the issuance by NNN of
16,000,000
shares of common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the DRIP for the year ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Shares of common stock
187,626
196,584
422,406
Net proceeds
$
8,340
$
7,182
$
14,817
The proceeds from the issuances were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility, fund future property acquisitions and for general corporate purposes.
At-The-Market Offerings.
NNN has established an at-the-market equity program ("ATM") which allows NNN to sell shares of common stock from time to time. The following outlines NNN's ATM programs:
2016 ATM
2015 ATM
2013 ATM
Established date
March 2016
February 2015
March 2013
Termination date
March 2019
March 2016
February 2015
Total allowable shares
12,000,000
10,000,000
9,000,000
Total shares issued as of December 31, 2016
4,223,290
9,852,465
6,252,812
The following table outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to NNN's ATM equity program (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
Shares of common stock
5,716,222
8,573,533
3,758,362
Average price per share (net)
$
46.48
$
37.45
$
35.90
Net proceeds
$
265,696
$
321,067
$
134,919
Stock issuance costs
(1)
$
4,266
$
4,016
$
2,195
(1)
Stock issuance costs consist primarily of underwriters' fees and commissions, and legal and
accounting fees.
Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests
As of December 31, 2015, NNN held the commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven loan securitizations. In 2016, the loan servicer of five of the securitizations exercised its clean-up call option. The clean-up call allowed the servicer to purchase all of the trusts’ assets, thereby terminating future cash distributions payable to NNN as the holder of these residual interests. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation impairment as a reduction of earnings from operations. The other than temporary valuation impairment recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016, includes impairment related to the execution of the clean-up call option on the five securitizations, as well as the fair value adjustment on the remaining two securitizations.
Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Unrealized gains (losses), net
$
(182
)
$
(585
)
$
875
Other than temporary valuation impairment
6,830
531
256
35
As of December 31, 2016, the remaining two Residuals are recorded at fair value. Certain valuation assumptions are made based on the expected timing of future cash flows relating to the Residuals. The following table summarizes the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
Discount rate
20
%
20
%
Average life equivalent CPR
(1)
speeds range
0.87% to 21.56% CPR
0.87% to 21.73% CPR
Foreclosures:
Frequency curve default model
0% - 1.33% range
0.72% - 1.57% range
Loss severity of loans in foreclosure
20
%
20
%
Yield:
LIBOR
Forward 3-month curve
Forward 3-month curve
Prime
Forward curve
Forward curve
Fair value at December 31
$
36
$
11,115
(1)
Conditional prepayment rate
36
Item7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
NNN is exposed to interest rate risk primarily as a result of its variable rate Credit Facility and its fixed rate debt which is used to finance NNN’s development and acquisition activities, as well as for general corporate purposes. NNN’s interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives, NNN borrows at both fixed and variable rates on its long-term debt. As of
December 31, 2016
, NNN had no outstanding derivatives.
The information in the table below summarizes NNN’s market risks associated with its debt obligations outstanding as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
. The table presents principal payments and related interest rates by year for debt obligations outstanding as of
December 31, 2016
. NNN has a variable interest rate risk on its Credit Facility which had no outstanding balance as of December 31, 2016. The weighted average rate for the Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2016, was 1.4%. The outstanding balance of the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $0. The table incorporates only those debt obligations that existed as of
December 31, 2016
, and it does not consider those debt obligations or positions which could arise after this date and therefore has limited predictive value. As a result, NNN’s ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, NNN’s hedging strategies at that time and interest rates. If interest rates on NNN’s variable rate debt increased by one percent, NNN’s interest expense would have increased by less than one percent for the year ended
December 31, 2016
.
Debt Obligations (dollars in thousands)
Fixed Rate Debt
Mortgages
(1)
Unsecured Debt
(2)
Debt
Obligation
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Debt
Obligation
Effective
Interest
Rate
2017
$
596
5.23%
$
249,907
6.92%
2018
623
5.23%
—
—
2019
652
5.23%
—
—
2020
682
5.23%
—
—
2021
716
5.23%
297,764
5.69%
Thereafter
10,718
5.23%
1,764,921
3.73%
(3)
Total
$
13,987
5.23%
$
2,312,592
4.39%
Fair Value:
December 31, 2016
$
13,987
$
2,367,102
December 31, 2015
$
24,097
$
2,007,242
(1)
NNN's mortgages payable include unamortized premiums and exclude debt costs.
(2)
Includes NNN’s notes payable, each exclude debt costs and are net of unamortized discounts. NNN uses market prices quoted from Bloomberg, a third party, which is a Level 1 input, to determine the fair value.
(3)
Weighted average effective interest rate for periods after 2021.
NNN is also exposed to market risks related to NNN’s Residuals. Factors that may impact the market value of the Residuals include delinquencies, loan losses, prepayment speeds and interest rates. The Residuals, which are reported at market value, had a carrying value of
$36,000
and
$11,115,000
as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Losses are considered other than temporary and reported as a valuation impairment in earnings from operations if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows that leads to a loss in value.
37
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 and our report dated February 13, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Orlando, Florida
February 13, 2017
38
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), National Retail Properties, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 13, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Certified Public Accountants
Orlando, Florida
February 13, 2017
39
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
ASSETS
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2015
Real estate portfolio:
Accounted for using the operating method, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization
$
5,881,280
$
5,231,413
Accounted for using the direct financing method
11,230
14,518
Real estate held for sale
23,850
57,527
Cash and cash equivalents
294,540
13,659
Restricted cash and cash held in escrow
—
601
Receivables, net of allowance of $1,006 and $566, respectively
3,418
3,344
Mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable, net of allowance of $14 and $5, respectively
1,252
8,688
Accrued rental income, net of allowance of $3,078
25,101
25,529
Debt costs, net of accumulated amortization of $11,268 and $9,877, respectively
2,715
4,003
Commercial mortgage residual interests
36
11,115
Other assets
90,729
89,647
Total assets
$
6,334,151
$
5,460,044
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable, including unamortized premium and net of unamortized debt costs
$
13,878
$
23,964
Notes payable, net of unamortized discount and unamortized debt costs
2,297,811
1,951,980
Accrued interest payable
19,665
20,113
Other liabilities
85,869
121,594
Total liabilities
2,417,223
2,117,651
Commitments and contingencies (Note 19)
Equity:
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 15,000,000 shares
6.625% Series D, 115,000 shares issued and outstanding, at stated liquidation value of $2,500 per share
287,500
287,500
5.700% Series E, 115,000 shares issued and outstanding, at stated liquidation value of $2,500 per share
287,500
287,500
5.200% Series F, 138,000 shares issued and outstanding, at stated liquidation value of $2,500 per share
345,000
—
Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 375,000,000 shares; 147,149,945 and 141,007,725
shares issued and outstanding, respectively
1,473
1,412
Capital in excess of par value
3,322,771
3,049,198
Accumulated deficit
(319,254
)
(263,124
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
(8,191
)
(20,352
)
Total stockholders’ equity of NNN
3,916,799
3,342,134
Noncontrolling interests
129
259
Total equity
3,916,928
3,342,393
Total liabilities and equity
$
6,334,151
$
5,460,044
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
40
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
Revenues:
Rental income from operating leases
$
512,883
$
462,346
$
414,043
Earned income from direct financing leases
1,336
1,506
1,725
Percentage rent
1,735
1,430
1,074
Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants
14,984
14,868
13,875
Interest and other income from real estate transactions
1,032
988
2,326
Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests
1,677
1,778
1,834
533,647
482,916
434,877
Operating expenses:
General and administrative
36,508
34,736
32,518
Real estate
20,852
19,776
18,935
Depreciation and amortization
149,101
134,798
116,162
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation
6,830
531
256
Impairment losses – real estate and other charges, net of recoveries
11,287
4,420
760
224,578
194,261
168,631
Earnings from operations
309,069
288,655
266,246
Other expenses (revenues):
Interest and other income
(170
)
(109
)
(357
)
Interest expense
96,352
90,008
85,510
Real estate acquisition costs
563
927
1,391
96,745
90,826
86,544
Earnings from continuing operations before income tax benefit (expense)
212,324
197,829
179,702
Income tax benefit (expense)
—
(10,318
)
75
Earnings from continuing operations
212,324
187,511
179,777
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense
—
—
124
Earnings before gain on disposition of real estate, net of income tax expense
212,324
187,511
179,901
Gain on disposition of real estate, net of income tax expense
27,182
10,450
11,269
Earnings including noncontrolling interests
239,506
197,961
191,170
Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests – continuing operations
(6
)
(125
)
(569
)
Net earnings attributable to NNN
$
239,500
$
197,836
$
190,601
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
41
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME – CONTINUED
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
Net earnings attributable to NNN
$
239,500
$
197,836
$
190,601
Series D preferred stock dividends
(19,047
)
(19,047
)
(19,047
)
Series E preferred stock dividends
(16,387
)
(16,387
)
(16,387
)
Series F preferred stock dividends
(3,189
)
—
—
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders
$
200,877
$
162,402
$
155,167
Net earnings per share of common stock:
Basic
$
1.39
$
1.21
$
1.24
Diluted
$
1.38
$
1.20
$
1.24
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic
144,176,224
133,998,674
124,257,558
Diluted
144,660,633
134,489,416
124,710,226
Other comprehensive income:
Net earnings attributable to NNN
$
239,500
$
197,836
$
190,601
Amortization of deferred interest rate hedges
2,802
1,902
1,129
Fair value forward starting swaps
13,345
(13,369
)
(6,312
)
Net gain (loss) – commercial mortgage residual interests
(4,454
)
(339
)
1,038
Net gain (loss) – available-for-sale securities
468
112
(8
)
Comprehensive income attributable to NNN
$
251,661
$
186,142
$
186,448
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
42
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Series D
Preferred
Stock
Series E
Preferred
Stock
Series F
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Retained
Earnings (Loss)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balances at December 31, 2013
$
287,500
$
287,500
$
—
$
1,221
$
2,353,166
$
(147,837
)
$
(4,505
)
$
2,777,045
$
1,240
$
2,778,285
Net earnings
—
—
—
—
—
190,601
—
190,601
569
191,170
Dividends declared and paid:
$1.65625 per depositary share of Series D preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(19,047
)
—
(19,047
)
—
(19,047
)
$1.42500 per depositary share of Series E preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(16,387
)
—
(16,387
)
—
(16,387
)
$1.65 per share of common stock
—
—
—
3
11,443
(204,157
)
—
(192,711
)
—
(192,711
)
Issuance of common stock:
5,493,595 shares
—
—
—
55
209,185
—
—
209,240
—
209,240
100,161 shares – stock purchase plan
—
—
—
1
3,370
—
—
3,371
—
3,371
3,758,362 shares – ATM equity program
—
—
—
38
137,077
—
—
137,115
—
137,115
Issuance of 360,080 shares of restricted common stock
—
—
—
4
(313
)
—
—
(309
)
—
(309
)
Stock issuance costs
—
—
—
—
(10,683
)
—
—
(10,683
)
—
(10,683
)
Amortization of deferred compensation
—
—
—
—
8,433
—
—
8,433
—
8,433
Amortization of interest rate hedges
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,129
1,129
—
1,129
Fair value forward starting swaps
—
—
—
—
—
—
(6,312
)
(6,312
)
—
(6,312
)
Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
875
875
—
875
Realized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
163
163
—
163
Valuation adjustments – available-for-sale securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
111
111
—
111
Realized gain – available-for-sale securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
(119
)
(119
)
—
(119
)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,232
)
(1,232
)
Balances at December 31, 2014
$
287,500
$
287,500
$
—
$
1,322
$
2,711,678
$
(196,827
)
$
(8,658
)
$
3,082,515
$
577
$
3,083,092
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
43
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY – CONTINUED
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Series D
Preferred
Stock
Series E
Preferred
Stock
Series F
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Retained
Earnings (Loss)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balances at December 31, 2014
$
287,500
$
287,500
$
—
$
1,322
$
2,711,678
$
(196,827
)
$
(8,658
)
$
3,082,515
$
577
$
3,083,092
Net earnings
—
—
—
—
—
197,836
—
197,836
125
197,961
Dividends declared and paid:
$1.65625 per depositary share of Series D preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(19,047
)
—
(19,047
)
—
(19,047
)
$1.42500 per depositary share of Series E preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(16,387
)
—
(16,387
)
—
(16,387
)
$1.71 per share of common stock
—
—
—
2
6,886
(228,699
)
—
(221,811
)
—
(221,811
)
Issuance of common stock:
34,230 shares
—
—
—
—
991
—
—
991
—
991
12,065 shares – stock purchase plan
—
—
—
—
455
—
—
455
—
455
8,573,533 shares – ATM equity program
—
—
—
86
324,998
—
—
325,084
—
325,084
Issuance of 209,284 shares of restricted common stock
—
—
—
2
(311
)
—
—
(309
)
—
(309
)
Stock issuance costs
—
—
—
—
(4,178
)
—
—
(4,178
)
—
(4,178
)
Amortization of deferred compensation
—
—
—
—
8,679
—
—
8,679
—
8,679
Amortization of interest rate hedges
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,902
1,902
—
1,902
Fair value forward starting swaps
—
—
—
—
—
—
(13,369
)
(13,369
)
—
(13,369
)
Unrealized loss – commercial mortgage residual interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
(585
)
(585
)
—
(585
)
Realized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
246
246
—
246
Valuation adjustments – available-for-sale securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
112
112
—
112
Contributions from noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
334
334
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(362
)
(362
)
Sale of noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(415
)
(415
)
Balances at December 31, 2015
$
287,500
$
287,500
$
—
$
1,412
$
3,049,198
$
(263,124
)
$
(20,352
)
$
3,342,134
$
259
$
3,342,393
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
44
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY – CONTINUED
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Series D
Preferred
Stock
Series E
Preferred
Stock
Series F
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
Retained
Earnings (Loss)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Equity
Balances at December 31, 2015
$
287,500
$
287,500
$
—
$
1,412
$
3,049,198
$
(263,124
)
$
(20,352
)
$
3,342,134
$
259
$
3,342,393
Net earnings
—
—
—
—
—
239,500
—
239,500
6
239,506
Dividends declared and paid:
$1.65625 per depositary share of Series D preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(19,047
)
—
(19,047
)
—
(19,047
)
$1.42500 per depositary share of Series E preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(16,387
)
—
(16,387
)
—
(16,387
)
$0.231111 per depositary share of Series F preferred stock
—
—
—
—
—
(3,189
)
—
(3,189
)
—
(3,189
)
$1.78 per share of common stock
—
—
—
2
7,949
(257,007
)
—
(249,056
)
—
(249,056
)
Issuance of 13,800,000 depositary shares of Series F preferred stock
—
—
345,000
—
(10,897
)
—
—
334,103
—
334,103
Issuance of common stock:
31,807 shares
—
—
—
—
1,148
—
—
1,148
—
1,148
8,444 shares – stock purchase plan
—
—
—
—
389
—
—
389
—
389
5,716,222 shares – ATM equity program
—
—
—
57
269,905
—
—
269,962
—
269,962
Issuance of 222,157 shares of restricted common stock
—
—
—
2
(264
)
—
—
(262
)
—
(262
)
Stock issuance costs
—
—
—
—
(4,266
)
—
—
(4,266
)
—
(4,266
)
Amortization of deferred compensation
—
—
—
—
9,609
—
—
9,609
—
9,609
Amortization of interest rate hedges
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,802
2,802
—
2,802
Fair value forward starting swaps
—
—
—
—
—
—
13,345
13,345
—
13,345
Unrealized loss – commercial mortgage residual interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
(182
)
(182
)
—
(182
)
Realized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
(4,272
)
(4,272
)
—
(4,272
)
Valuation adjustments – available-for-sale securities
—
—
—
—
—
—
468
468
—
468
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(136
)
(136
)
Balances at December 31, 2016
$
287,500
$
287,500
$
345,000
$
1,473
$
3,322,771
$
(319,254
)
$
(8,191
)
$
3,916,799
$
129
$
3,916,928
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
45
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Earnings including noncontrolling interests
$
239,506
$
197,961
$
191,170
Adjustments to reconcile earnings including noncontrolling interests to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
149,101
134,798
116,165
Impairment losses – real estate and other charges, net of recoveries
11,294
4,420
823
Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation
6,830
531
256
Amortization of notes payable discount
1,394
1,306
1,238
Amortization of debt costs
3,086
2,915
2,782
Amortization of mortgages payable premium
(147
)
(207
)
(93
)
Amortization of deferred interest rate hedges
2,802
1,902
1,129
Settlement of forward starting swaps
13,345
(13,369
)
(6,312
)
Gain on disposition of real estate
(27,182
)
(10,807
)
(11,742
)
Deferred income taxes
—
10,488
58
Performance incentive plan expense
11,401
10,474
9,841
Performance incentive plan payment
(581
)
(676
)
(2,808
)
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations:
Decrease in real estate leased to others using the direct financing method
1,364
1,277
1,368
Decrease in mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable
26
74
76
Decrease (increase) in receivables
(74
)
(335
)
16
Increase in accrued rental income
(252
)
(368
)
(1,731
)
Decrease (increase) in other assets
1,663
4,996
(2,256
)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable
(448
)
2,717
254
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
2,636
(6,610
)
(4,746
)
Other
(427
)
(392
)
1,245
Net cash provided by operating activities
415,337
341,095
296,733
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from the disposition of real estate
104,117
38,502
58,853
Additions to real estate:
Accounted for using the operating method
(885,966
)
(683,243
)
(602,780
)
Increase in mortgages and notes receivable
—
—
(7,246
)
Principal payments on mortgages and notes receivable
4,141
2,363
13,346
Other
(2,235
)
(2,166
)
(3,731
)
Net cash used in investing activities
(779,943
)
(644,544
)
(541,558
)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
46
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – CONTINUED
(dollars in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from line of credit payable
$
1,330,200
$
1,262,400
$
678,500
Repayment of line of credit payable
(1,330,200
)
(1,262,400
)
(724,900
)
Repayment of mortgages payable
(9,962
)
(2,035
)
(1,151
)
Proceeds from notes payable
346,140
399,036
349,293
Repayment of notes payable
—
(150,000
)
(150,000
)
Payment of debt costs
(3,362
)
(3,654
)
(6,321
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
278,040
332,117
360,072
Proceeds from issuance of Series F preferred stock
345,000
—
—
Stock issuance costs
(15,204
)
(4,198
)
(10,726
)
Payment of Series D Preferred Stock dividends
(19,047
)
(19,047
)
(19,047
)
Payment of Series E Preferred Stock dividends
(16,387
)
(16,387
)
(16,387
)
Payment of Series F Preferred Stock dividends
(3,189
)
—
—
Payment of common stock dividends
(257,007
)
(228,699
)
(204,157
)
Noncontrolling interest contributions
—
334
—
Noncontrolling interest distributions
(136
)
(362
)
(1,232
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
644,886
307,105
253,944
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
280,280
3,656
9,119
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year
(1)
14,260
10,604
1,485
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year
(1)
$
294,540
$
14,260
$
10,604
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amount capitalized
$
91,403
$
83,758
$
81,829
Taxes paid (received)
$
(155
)
$
234
$
59
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:
Issued 285,573, 285,263 and 386,433 shares of restricted and unrestricted common stock in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan
$
11,337
$
8,990
$
10,884
Surrender of 1,520 shares of restricted common stock in 2016
$
59
$
—
$
—
Change in other comprehensive income
$
12,161
$
11,694
$
4,153
Change in lease classification (direct financing lease to operating lease)
$
1,924
$
1,179
$
—
Mortgages payable assumed in connection with real estate transactions
$
—
$
—
$
17,254
Mortgage receivable accepted in connection with real estate transactions
$
—
$
500
$
62
Note receivable accepted in connection with real estate transactions
$
—
$
—
$
70
(1)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the year is the aggregate of Cash and cash equivalents and Restricted cash and cash held in escrow from the Consolidated Balance Sheets. NNN had restricted cash and cash held in escrow of $601 at December 31, 2015. NNN did not have restricted cash or cash held in escrow at December 31, 2016 and 2014.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
47
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
and SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
Organization and Nature of Business
– National Retail Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust ("REIT") formed in 1984. The term "NNN" or the "Company" refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries. These taxable subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the "TRS." At the close of business on December 31, 2015, NNN elected to revoke its election to classify the TRS as taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS Revocation Election").
NNN's assets primarily include real estate assets. NNN acquires, owns, invests in and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment ("Properties" or "Property Portfolio," or individually a "Property").
December 31, 2016
Property Portfolio:
Total properties
2,535
Gross leasable area (square feet)
27,204,000
States
48
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
11.6
NNN's operations are reported within
one
business segment in the financial statements and all properties are considered part of the Properties or Property Portfolio. As such, property counts and calculations involving property counts reflect all NNN properties.
Principles of Consolidation
– NNN’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of each of the respective majority owned and controlled affiliates, including transactions whereby NNN has been determined to be the primary beneficiary in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") guidance included in
Consolidation.
All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated.
NNN consolidates certain joint venture development entities based upon either NNN being the primary beneficiary of the respective variable interest entity or NNN having a controlling interest over the respective entity. NNN eliminates significant intercompany balances and transactions and records a noncontrolling interest for its other partners’ ownership percentage.
Real Estate Portfolio
– NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, NNN recorded
$1,738,000
,
$2,383,000
and
$1,629,000
, respectively, in capitalized interest during development.
Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease
– In accordance with the FASB guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases and the value of in-place leases, as applicable, based on their respective fair values. Acquisition costs
incurred in connection with a business combination are expensed when incurred.
The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired leased property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the "as-if-vacant" value is then allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on the determination of their fair values.
In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded as other assets or liabilities based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases, and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease and the applicable option terms if it is probable that the tenant will
48
exercise options. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term unless the Company believes that it is likely that the tenant will renew the lease for an option term whereby the Company amortizes the value attributable to the renewal over the renewal period.
The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, consisting of in-place leases, is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental rates over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as-if-vacant, determined as set forth above. The value of in-place leases exclusive of the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be written off in that period. The value of tenant relationships is reviewed on individual transactions to determine if future value was derived from the acquisition.
Intangible assets and liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
Intangible lease assets (included in Other assets):
Value of above market in-place leases, net
$
9,591
$
10,883
Value of in-place leases, net
55,290
61,359
Intangible lease liabilities (included in Other liabilities):
Value of below market in-place leases, net
22,100
25,767
NNN's real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the Property, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance, repairs and capital expenditures. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:
Operating method
– Properties with leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rentals vary during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.
Direct financing method
– Properties with leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the Property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.
Real Estate – Held For Sale
– Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value, less cost to sell.
Impairment – Real Estate
– Based upon certain events or changes in circumstances, management periodically assesses its Properties for possible impairment whenever the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions and the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are currently vacant or become vacant in a reasonable period of time. Management evaluates whether an impairment in carrying value has occurred by comparing the estimated future and undiscounted cash flows, including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying value of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated fair value.
Real Estate Dispositions
– When real estate is disposed of, the related cost, accumulated depreciation or amortization and any accrued rental income for operating leases and the net investment for direct financing leases are removed from the accounts, and gains and losses from the dispositions are reflected in income. Gains from the disposition of real estate are generally recognized using the full accrual method in accordance with the FASB guidance included in
Real Estate Sales
, provided that various criteria relating to the terms of the sale and any subsequent involvement by NNN with the real estate sold are met.
Valuation of Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest Receivable
– The reserve allowance related to the mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable is NNN’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses. The reserve allowance is determined
49
on an individual note basis in reviewing any payment past due for over 90 days. Any outstanding amounts are written off against the reserve allowance when all possible means of collection have been exhausted.
Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, at Fair Value
– Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their estimated market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
– NNN considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and money market accounts. Cash equivalents are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.
Cash accounts maintained on behalf of NNN in demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds may exceed federally insured levels or may be held in accounts without any federal insurance or any other insurance or guarantee. However, NNN has not experienced any losses in such accounts.
Restricted Cash and Cash Held in Escrow
– Restricted cash and cash held in escrow include (i) cash proceeds from the sale of assets held by qualified intermediaries in anticipation of the acquisition of replacement properties in tax-free exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, (ii) cash that has been placed in escrow for the future funding of construction commitments, or (iii) cash that is not immediately available to NNN.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash." The amendments in this update require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. NNN has elected early adoption of ASU 2016-18. The adoption of ASU 2016-18 did not impact NNN's financial position or results of operations.
Valuation of Receivables
– NNN estimates the collectibility of its accounts receivable related to rents, expense reimbursements and other revenues. NNN analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, tenant credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants in bankruptcy are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims.
Debt Costs – Line of Credit Payable
–
Debt costs incurred in connection with NNN’s
$650,000,000
line of credit have been deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan commitment using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. NNN has recorded debt costs associated with the line of credit as an asset, in Debt Costs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Debt Costs – Mortgages Payable
–
Debt costs incurred in connection with NNN’s mortgages payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective loan commitment using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. These costs of $
147,000
and $
226,000
at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are included in Mortgages Payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of accumulated amortization of $
38,000
and $
93,000
, respectively.
Debt Costs – Notes Payable
–
Debt costs incurred in connection with the issuance of NNN’s notes payable have been deferred and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the respective debt obligation using the effective interest method. These costs of $
21,157,000
and $
17,782,000
at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are included in Notes Payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of accumulated amortization of $
6,376,000
and $
4,704,000
, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
– Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant. Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance included in
Leases,
based on the terms of the lease of the leased asset. Lease termination fees are recognized when the related leases are cancelled and NNN no longer has a continuing involvement with the former tenant with respect to that property.
50
Earnings Per Share
– Earnings per share have been computed pursuant to the FASB guidance included in
Earnings Per Share
. The guidance requires classification of the Company’s unvested restricted share units which contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends, as participating securities requiring the two-class method of computing earnings per share. Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In applying the two-class method, undistributed earnings are allocated to both common shares and participating securities based on the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. The following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share using the two-class method for the years ended
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Basic and Diluted Earnings:
Net earnings attributable to NNN
$
239,500
$
197,836
$
190,601
Less: Series D preferred stock dividends
(19,047
)
(19,047
)
(19,047
)
Less: Series E preferred stock dividends
(16,387
)
(16,387
)
(16,387
)
Less: Series F preferred stock dividends
(3,189
)
—
—
Net earnings attributable to common stockholders
200,877
162,402
155,167
Less: Earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares
(695
)
(706
)
(773
)
Net earnings used in basic and diluted earnings per share
$
200,182
$
161,696
$
154,394
Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
145,014,422
134,868,640
125,221,358
Less: Unvested restricted shares
(390,522
)
(412,505
)
(467,968
)
Less: Unvested contingent restricted shares
(447,676
)
(457,461
)
(495,832
)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share
144,176,224
133,998,674
124,257,558
Effects of dilutive securities:
Other
484,409
490,742
452,668
Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in diluted earnings per share
144,660,633
134,489,416
124,710,226
Income Taxes
– NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and related regulations. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, providing it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the
three
-year period ended
December 31, 2016
, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.
NNN and its taxable REIT subsidiaries have made timely TRS elections pursuant to the provisions of the REIT Modernization Act. A taxable REIT subsidiary is able to engage in activities resulting in income that previously would have been disqualified from being eligible REIT income under the federal income tax regulations. As a result, certain activities of NNN which occur within its TRS entities are subject to federal and state income taxes (See Note 11). All provisions for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are attributable to NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries and to the Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. ("OAMI"), a wholly owned qualified REIT subsidiary, built-in gain tax liability.
At the close of business on December 31, 2015, NNN elected to revoke its election to classify the TRS as taxable REIT subsidiaries ("TRS Revocation Election"). This TRS Revocation Election resulted in an additional tax expense of approximately
$9,607,000
for 2015.
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method as required by the FASB guidance included in
Income Taxes
. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the temporary differences based on estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect
51
on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
Fair Value Measurement
– NNN’s estimates of fair value of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities are based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The framework specifies a hierarchy of valuation inputs which was established to increase consistency, clarity and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based upon three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, two of which are considered observable and one that is considered unobservable. The following describes the three levels:
•
Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
•
Level 2 – Valuation is based upon inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
•
Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
– The following table outlines the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (dollars in thousands):
Gain or Loss on Cash Flow Hedges
(1)
Gains and Losses on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests
(2)
Gains and Losses on Available-for-Sale Securities
Total
Beginning balance, December 31, 2014
$
(13,579
)
$
4,793
$
128
$
(8,658
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
(13,369
)
(585
)
112
(13,842
)
Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to net earnings
1,902
(3)
246
(4
)
—
2,148
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
(11,467
)
(339
)
112
(11,694
)
Ending balance, December 31, 2015
(25,046
)
4,454
240
(20,352
)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
13,345
(182
)
468
13,631
Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income to net earnings
2,802
(3)
(4,272
)
(4
)
—
(1,470
)
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)
16,147
(4,454
)
468
12,161
Ending balance, December 31, 2016
$
(8,899
)
$
—
$
708
$
(8,191
)
(1)
Additional disclosure is included in Note 12 – Derivatives.
(2)
Additional disclosure is included in Note 17 – Fair Value Measurements.
(3)
Reclassifications out of other comprehensive income (loss) are recorded in Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. There is
no
income tax expense (benefit) resulting from this reclassification.
(4)
Reclassifications out of other comprehensive income (loss) are recorded in Impairment on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income. There is
no
income tax expense (benefit) resulting from this reclassification.
New Accounting Pronouncements
– In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The core principle of ASU 2014-09, is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Certain contracts are excluded from ASU 2014-09, including lease contracts within the scope of the FASB guidance included in
Leases
. In March 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance. ASU 2016-08, "Revenue from Contracts with customers (Topic 606) - Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Gross Versus Net)," clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations included within the scope of ASU 2014-09. The guidance permits two methods of adoption: full retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or modified retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up
52
transition method). The guidance was initially effective January 1, 2017 and early adoption was not permitted. The amended guidance provides for a one-year deferral of the effective date to January 1, 2018, with an option of applying the standard on the original effective date. NNN will adopt the guidance on January 1, 2018 and apply the cumulative catch-up transition method. NNN is currently evaluating to determine the potential impact the adoption of ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2016-08 will have on its financial position and results of operations.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, "Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10) - Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities," effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments in this update address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 will not have an impact on NNN's financial position or results of operations.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)," effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The FASB issued final guidance that requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses in the income statement in a manner similar to today’s accounting. The guidance also eliminates today’s real estate-specific provisions and changes the guidance on sale-leaseback transactions, initial direct costs and lease executory costs for all entities. For lessors, the standard modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. NNN is currently evaluating to determine the potential impact the adoption of ASU 2016-02 will have on NNN's financial position or results of operations.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments." The update is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The update clarifies the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. The adoption of ASU 2016-06 will not have an impact on NNN's financial position or results of operations.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)," effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The areas for simplification in this update involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 will not have an impact on NNN's financial position or results of operations.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments," effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments in this update replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 will not have an impact on NNN's financial position or results of operations.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, "Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments," effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments in this update provide guidance on certain cash flow classification issues. The objective of the amendment is to reduce existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows under Topic 230. NNN is currently evaluating to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will have on the presentation of NNN's condensed consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business," effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The amendments in this update provide a screen to determine when a set is not a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. NNN is currently evaluating to determine the potential impact the adoption of ASU 2017-01 will have on NNN's financial position or results of operations.
Use of Estimates
– Additional critical accounting policies of NNN include management’s estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Additional critical accounting policies include management’s estimates of the useful lives used in calculating depreciation expense relating to real estate assets, purchase price allocation, the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including the commercial mortgage residual interests, the recoverability of the deferred income taxes, and the collectibility of receivables from tenants, including accrued rental income. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
53
Reclassification
– Certain items in the prior year's consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2016 presentation.
Note 2 – Real Estate:
Real Estate – Portfolio
Leases
– The following outlines key information for NNN’s leases at
December 31, 2016
:
Lease classification:
Operating
2,566
Direct financing
9
Building portion – direct financing/land portion – operating
2
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
11.6
The leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. Generally, the tenant is also required to pay all property taxes and assessments, substantially maintain the Property and carry property and liability insurance coverage. Certain of the Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for specific costs and expenses of the Property. Generally, the leases provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options, subject to generally the same terms and conditions of the base term of the lease, including rent increases.
Real Estate Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Operating Method
– Real estate subject to operating leases consisted of the following as of
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
Land and improvements
$
2,102,915
$
1,909,569
Buildings and improvements
4,489,248
3,876,986
Leasehold interests
4,565
1,290
6,596,728
5,787,845
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
(739,505
)
(617,786
)
5,857,223
5,170,059
Work in progress
24,057
61,354
$
5,881,280
$
5,231,413
Some leases provide for scheduled rent increases throughout the lease term. Such amounts are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. For the years ended
December 31
,
2016
,
2015
and
2014
, NNN recognized
($12,000)
,
$153,000
and
$1,521,000
, respectively, of such income, net of reserves. At
December 31
,
2016
and
2015
, the balance of accrued rental income was
$25,101,000
and
$25,529,000
, respectively, net of
$3,078,000
allowance.
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on noncancellable operating leases at
December 31, 2016
(dollars in thousands):
2017
$
535,048
2018
522,708
2019
508,143
2020
490,805
2021
470,388
Thereafter
3,721,409
$
6,248,501
54
Since lease renewal periods are exercisable at the option of the tenant, the above table only presents future minimum lease payments due during the current lease terms. In addition, this table does not include amounts for potential variable rent increases that are based on the CPI or future contingent rents which may be received on the leases based on a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales.
Real Estate Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Direct Financing Method
– The following lists the components of net investment in direct financing leases at
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
Minimum lease payments to be received
$
11,200
$
13,900
Estimated unguaranteed residual values
5,664
7,589
Less unearned income
(5,634
)
(6,971
)
Net investment in direct financing leases
$
11,230
$
14,518
The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on direct financing leases held for investment at
December 31, 2016
(dollars in thousands):
2017
$
1,862
2018
1,834
2019
1,512
2020
1,043
2021
719
Thereafter
4,230
$
11,200
The above table does not include future minimum lease payments for renewal periods, potential variable CPI rent increases or contingent rental payments that may become due in future periods (see Real Estate Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Operating Method).
Real Estate – Held For Sale
On a quarterly basis, the Company evaluates its Properties for held for sale classification based on specific criteria as outlined in ASC 360,
Property, Plant & Equipment,
including management’s intent to commit to a plan to sell the asset. NNN anticipates the disposition of Properties classified as held for sale to occur within 12 months. As of
December 31, 2016
, NNN had
16
of its Properties categorized as held for sale. NNN's real estate held for sale at
December 31, 2015
, included
21
properties,
five
of which were sold in
2016
. Real estate held for sale consisted of the following as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
Land and improvements
$
14,114
$
23,024
Building and improvements
15,446
43,327
29,560
66,351
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
(2,962
)
(6,821
)
Less impairment
(2,748
)
(2,003
)
$
23,850
$
57,527
55
Real Estate – Dispositions
The following table summarizes the Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized on the disposition of Properties for the years ended
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
# of Sold
Properties
Gain
# of Sold
Properties
Gain
# of Sold
Properties
Gain
Gain on disposition of real estate
38
$
27,182
19
$
10,807
(1)
25
$
11,587
Income tax expense
—
(357
)
(318
)
27,182
10,450
11,269
Gain on disposition of real estate included in discontinued operations
—
—
—
—
2
155
(1)
Income tax expense
—
—
—
$
27,182
$
10,450
$
11,424
(1)
Amount includes the recognition of deferred gains on previously sold properties.
Real Estate – Commitments
NNN has committed to fund construction commitments on
21
Properties. The improvements are estimated to be completed within 12 months. These construction commitments, at
December 31, 2016
, are outlined in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Total commitment
(1)
$
114,206
Amount funded
$
54,782
Remaining commitment
$
59,424
(1)
Includes land, construction costs, tenant improvements and lease costs.
Real Estate – Impairments
Management periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions and the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant in a reasonable period of time. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. As a result of the Company’s review of long lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets, NNN recognized the following real estate impairments for the years ended
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Continuing operations
$
8,025
$
3,970
$
760
Discontinued operations
—
—
63
$
8,025
$
3,970
$
823
The valuation of impaired assets is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis, income capitalization, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sales negotiations and bona fide purchase offers received from third parties, which are Level 3 inputs. NNN may consider a single valuation technique or multiple valuation techniques, as appropriate, when estimating the fair value of its real estate.
56
Note 3 – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests
:
As of December 31, 2015, NNN held the commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) from
seven
loan securitizations. In 2016, the loan servicer of
five
of the securitizations exercised its clean-up call option. These clean-up calls allowed the servicers to purchase all of the trusts’ assets, thereby terminating future cash distributions payable to NNN as the holder of these residual interests. During the years ended December 31 2016, 2015 and 2014, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation impairment as a reduction of earnings from operations. The other than temporary valuation impairment recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016 related to the execution of the clean-up call option on the
five
securitizations, as well as the fair value adjustment on the remaining
two
securitizations.
Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Unrealized gains (losses), net
$
(182
)
$
(585
)
$
875
Other than temporary valuation impairment
6,830
531
256
As of December 31, 2016, the remaining
two
Residuals are recorded at fair value. Certain valuation assumptions are made based on the expected timing of future cash flows relating to the Residuals. The following table summarizes the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
Discount rate
20
%
20
%
Average life equivalent CPR
(1)
speeds range
0.87% to 21.56% CPR
0.87% to 21.73% CPR
Foreclosures:
Frequency curve default model
0% - 1.33% range
0.72% - 1.57% range
Loss severity of loans in foreclosure
20
%
20
%
Yield:
LIBOR
Forward 3-month curve
Forward 3-month curve
Prime
Forward curve
Forward curve
Fair value at December 31
$
36
$
11,115
(1)
Conditional prepayment rate
Note 4 – Line of Credit Payable
:
NNN's
$650,000,000
unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) had a weighted average outstanding balance of
$70,139,000
and a weighted average interest rate of
1.4%
for the year ended
December 31, 2016
. The Credit Facility matures
January 2019
, with an option to extend maturity to
January 2020
. As of
December 31, 2016
, the Credit Facility bears interest at
LIBOR plus 92.5
basis points; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN's debt rating. The Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature to increase the facility size up to
$1,000,000,000
. As of
December 31, 2016
, there was
no
outstanding balance and
$650,000,000
was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling
$230,000
.
In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage and (iv) investment and dividend limitations. At
December 31, 2016
, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.
57
Note 5 – Mortgages Payable
:
The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):
Entered
(1)
Initial
Balance
Interest
Rate
Maturity
(2)
Carrying
Value of
Encumbered
Asset(s)
(3)
Outstanding Principal
Balance at December 31,
2016
2015
February 2004
(6)
$
6,952
6.90%
January 2017
$
—
$
—
$
848
June 2012
(4)(5)
6,850
5.75%
April 2016
—
—
5,890
September 2014
(4)(7)
2,957
6.40%
February 2017
—
—
2,804
November 2014
(4)
15,151
5.23%
July 2023
21,403
13,987
14,555
$
21,403
13,987
24,097
Debt costs
(147
)
(226
)
Accumulated amortization
38
93
Debt costs, net of accumulated amortization
(109
)
(133
)
Mortgages payable, including unamortized premium and net of unamortized debt costs
$
13,878
$
23,964
(1)
Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan.
(2)
Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.
(3)
Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of the Properties. The carrying values of the assets at
December 31, 2016
.
(4)
Initial balance and outstanding principal balance includes unamortized premium.
(5)
NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance in January 2016.
(6)
NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance in March 2016.
(7)
NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance in October 2016.
The following is a schedule of the scheduled principal payments, including premium amortization of NNN’s mortgages payable at
December 31, 2016
(dollars in thousands):
2017
$
596
2018
623
2019
652
2020
682
2021
716
Thereafter
10,718
$
13,987
58
Note 6 – Notes Payable
:
Each of NNN’s outstanding series of unsecured notes is summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):
Notes
Issue Date
Principal
Discount
(1)
Net
Price
Stated
Rate
Effective
Rate
(2)
Maturity
Date
2017
(3)
September 2007
$
250,000
$
877
$
249,123
6.875%
6.924%
October 2017
2021
(4)
July 2011
300,000
4,269
295,731
5.500%
5.689%
July 2021
2022
August 2012
325,000
4,989
320,011
3.800%
3.985%
October 2022
2023
(5)
April 2013
350,000
2,594
347,406
3.300%
3.388%
April 2023
2024
(6)
May 2014
350,000
707
349,293
3.900%
3.924%
June 2024
2025
(7)
October 2015
400,000
964
399,036
4.000%
4.029%
November 2025
2026
(8)
December 2016
350,000
3,860
346,140
3.600%
3.733%
December 2026
(1)
The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.
(2)
Includes the effects of the discount at issuance.
(3)
NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of
$100,000
. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of
$3,260
, of which
$3,228
was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
(4)
NNN entered into
two
interest rate hedges with a total notional amount of
$150,000
. Upon issuance of the 2021 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreements resulting in a liability of
$5,300
, of which
$5,218
was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
(5)
NNN entered into
four
forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of
$240,000
. Upon issuance of the 2023 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a liability of
$3,156
, of which
$3,141
was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
(6)
NNN entered into
three
forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of
$225,000
. Upon issuance of the 2024 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a liability of
$6,312
, which was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
(7)
NNN entered into
four
forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of
$300,000
. Upon issuance of the 2025 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a liability of
$13,369
, which was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred liability is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
(8)
NNN entered into
two
forward starting swaps with an aggregate notional amount of
$180,000
. Upon issuance of the 2026 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting swaps resulting in a gain of
$13,345
, which was deferred in other comprehensive income. The deferred asset is being amortized over the term of the notes using the effective interest method.
Each series of the notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and is subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. Each of the notes is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.
In connection with the outstanding debt offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling
$21,157,000
consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.
In
December 2015
, NNN repaid the
$150,000,000
6.150%
notes payable that were due in
December 2015
.
In accordance with the terms of the indenture, pursuant to which NNN’s notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios and (ii) certain interest coverage. At
December 31, 2016
, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.
59
Note 7 – Preferred Stock
:
NNN completed the following underwritten public offerings of cumulative redeemable preferred stock and are still outstanding ("Preferred Stock Shares") (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
Series
Dividend Rate
(1)
Issued
Depositary Shares Outstanding
(2)
Gross Proceeds
Stock Issuance Costs
(3)
Dividend Per Depositary Share
Earliest Redemption Date
Series D
6.625
%
February 2012
11,500,000
$
287,500
$
9,855
$
1.656250
February 2017
Series E
5.700
%
May 2013
11,500,000
287,500
9,856
1.425000
May 2018
Series F
5.200
%
October 2016
13,800,000
345,000
10,897
1.300000
October 2021
(1)
Holders are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends.
(2)
Representing
1/100
th of a preferred share. Series D and E issuances each included
1,500,000
depositary shares in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment. Series F issuance included
1,800,000
depositary shares in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment.
(3)
Consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, rating agency fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.
The Preferred Stock Shares underlying the depositary shares rank senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Preferred Stock Shares have no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. In addition, upon a change of control, as defined in the articles supplementary fixing the rights and preferences of the Preferred Stock Shares, NNN may redeem the Preferred Stock Shares underlying the depositary shares at a redemption price of
$2,500.00
per share (or
$25.00
per depositary share), plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends, and in limited circumstances the holders of depositary shares may convert some or all of their Preferred Stock Shares into shares of NNN's common stock at conversion rates provided in the related articles supplementary. As of
February 13, 2017
, the Series E and Series F Preferred Stock Shares were not redeemable or convertible.
In January 2017, NNN announced the redemption of all outstanding depositary shares representing interests in its
6.625%
Series D Preferred Stock. The depositary shares will be redeemed on February 23, 2017 at
$25.00
per depositary share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends through the redemption date, for an aggregate redemption price of
$25.3128472
per depositary share. After the redemption date, dividends on the depositary shares representing interests in the Series D Preferred Stock will cease to accrue.
Note 8 – Common Stock
:
In February 2015, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission which permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities.
Equity Offerings.
In November 2014, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2012 shelf registration statement and issued
5,462,500
shares (including
712,500
shares in connection with the underwriters' over-allotment) of common stock at a price of
$38.16
per share and received net proceeds of
$199,961,000
. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately
$8,488,000
, consisting primarily of underwriters' fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.
In
February 2015
, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission for its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan ("DRIP") which permits the issuance by NNN of
16,000,000
shares of common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the DRIP for the year ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Shares of common stock
187,626
196,584
422,406
Net proceeds
$
8,340
$
7,182
$
14,817
60
At The Market Offerings.
NNN has established an at-the-market equity program ("ATM") which allows NNN to sell shares of common stock from time to time. The following outlines NNN's ATM programs:
2016 ATM
2015 ATM
2013 ATM
Established date
March 2016
February 2015
March 2013
Termination date
March 2019
March 2016
February 2015
Total allowable shares
12,000,000
10,000,000
9,000,000
Total shares issued as of December 31, 2016
4,223,290
9,852,465
6,252,812
The following table outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to NNN's ATM equity program (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
Year Ended December 31,
2016
2015
2014
Shares of common stock
5,716,222
8,573,533
3,758,362
Average price per share (net)
$
46.48
$
37.45
$
35.90
Net proceeds
$
265,696
$
321,067
$
134,919
Stock issuance costs
(1)
$
4,266
$
4,016
$
2,195
(1)
Stock issuance costs consist primarily of underwriters' fees and commissions, and legal and accounting fees.
Note 9 – Employee Benefit Plan
:
Effective January 1, 1998, NNN adopted a defined contribution retirement plan (the “Retirement Plan”) covering substantially all of the employees of NNN. The Retirement Plan permits participants to defer a portion of their compensation, as defined in the Retirement Plan, subject to limits established by the Code. NNN generally matches
60
percent of the first
eight
percent of a participant’s contributions. Additionally, NNN may make discretionary contributions. NNN’s contributions to the Retirement Plan for the years ended
December 31, 2016
,
2015
and
2014
totaled
$491,000
,
$474,000
and
$453,000
, respectively.
Note 10 – Dividends
:
The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of common stock dividends per share paid to stockholders for the years ended
December 31
:
2016
2015
2014
Ordinary dividends
$
1.513705
$
1.363294
$
1.306992
Qualified dividends
—
0.019005
0.006212
Capital gain
—
0.007806
0.008603
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain
—
0.011055
0.015362
Nontaxable distributions
0.266295
0.308840
0.312831
$
1.780000
$
1.710000
$
1.650000
The following table outlines the dividends declared and paid for NNN's common stock for the years ended December 31 (in thousands, except per share data):
2016
2015
2014
Dividends
$
257,007
$
228,699
$
204,157
Per share
1.780
1.710
1.650
On
January 17, 2017
, NNN declared a dividend of
$0.455
per share, payable
February 15, 2017
to its common stockholders of record as of
January 31, 2017
.
61
The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of Series D, E and F Preferred Stock dividends per share and dividends declared and paid to stockholders for the year ended December 31:
Series F
(3)
Series E
(2)
Series D
(1)
2016
2016
2015
2014
2016
2015
2014
Ordinary dividends
$
0.231111
$
1.425000
$
1.385670
$
1.393700
$
1.656250
$
1.610538
$
1.619870
Qualified dividends
—
—
0.020141
0.005738
—
0.023409
0.006670
Capital gain
—
—
0.007937
0.009177
—
0.009225
0.010666
Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain
—
—
0.011252
0.016385
—
0.013078
0.019044
Dividend paid per share
$
0.231111
$
1.425000
$
1.425000
$
1.425000
$
1.656250
$
1.656250
$
1.656250
Dividends declared and paid
$
3,189
$
16,387
$
16,387
$
16,387
$
19,047
$
19,047
$
19,047
(1)
In January 2017, NNN called for redemption of all outstanding shares of its Series D Preferred Stock represented by depositary shares, each representing a 1/100th interest in a Series D Preferred Stock share. The depositary shares will be redeemed on February 23, 2017.
(2)
The Series E Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed by NNN. The earliest redemption date for the Series E Preferred Stock is May 2018.
(3)
The Series F Preferred Stock was issued October 11, 2016 and has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed by NNN. The earliest redemption date for the Series F preferred stock is October 2021.
Note 11 – Income Taxes
:
For income tax purposes, NNN had taxable REIT subsidiaries in which certain real estate activities were conducted.
NNN treats some depreciation expense and certain other items differently for tax than for financial reporting purposes. The principal differences between NNN’s effective tax rates for the years ended
December 31,
2016
,
2015
and
2014
, and the statutory rates relate to state taxes and nondeductible expenses.
At the close of business on December 31, 2015, NNN elected to revoke its election to classify the TRS as taxable REIT subsidiaries. This TRS Revocation Election resulted in an additional tax expense of approximately
$9,607,000
for 2015.
The significant components of the net deferred income tax asset consist of the following at
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
Deferred tax assets:
Capital loss carryforward
$
830
$
880
Net operating loss carryforward
5,088
4,983
5,918
5,863
Valuation allowance
(5,743
)
(5,666
)
Total deferred tax assets
175
197
Deferred tax liabilities:
Built-in gain
(175
)
(197
)
Total deferred tax liabilities
(175
)
(197
)
Net deferred tax asset
$
—
$
—
In assessing the ability to realize a deferred tax asset, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The net operating loss carryforwards were generated by NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries. The net
62
operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2028. Due to the revocation of the TRS election management believes it is unlikely that NNN will realize all of the benefits of these deductible differences that existed as of
December 31, 2016
and
2015
.
The increase in the valuation allowance for the years ended
December 31,
2016
,
2015
and
2014
was
$77,000
,
$5,047,000
and
$619,000
, respectively.
The income tax benefit (expense) consists of the following components for the years ended
December 31
(dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Net earnings before income taxes
$
239,500
$
208,511
$
190,844
Provision for income tax benefit (expense):
Current:
Federal
—
(58
)
(190
)
State and local
—
(129
)
5
Deferred:
Federal
—
(8,935
)
(166
)
State and local
—
(1,553
)
108
Total expense for income taxes
—
(10,675
)
(243
)
Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders
$
239,500
$
197,836
$
190,601
The total income tax benefit (expense) differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal tax rate to net earnings before taxes as follows for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):
2016
2015
2014
Federal expense at statutory tax rate
$
—
$
(70,894
)
$
(64,887
)
Nontaxable income of NNN
—
69,651
63,353
State taxes, net of federal benefit
—
(141
)
(196
)
Amortization of built-in gain tax
—
—
372
Expiration of built-in gain tax
—
316
1,792
Other
55
—
(58
)
Built-in gain tax liability
(1)
22
(197
)
—
TRS Revocation Election
(1)
—
(4,363
)
—
Valuation allowance increase
(1)
(77
)
(5,047
)
(619
)
Total tax expense
$
—
$
(10,675
)
$
(243
)
(
1)
The change for the year ended December 31, 2015, is due to TRS Revocation Election.
FASB prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FASB also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
NNN, in accordance with FASB guidance included in
Income Taxes
, has analyzed its various federal and state filing positions. NNN believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions are well documented and supported. Additionally, NNN believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to the FASB guidance. In addition, NNN did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of the FASB guidance.
NNN has had
no
unrecognized tax benefits during any of the years presented. Further,
no
interest or penalties have been included since no reserves were recorded and no significant increases or decreases are expected to occur within the next
12
months. When applicable, such interest and penalties will be recorded in non-operating expenses. The periods that remain open under federal statute are
2013
through
2016
. NNN also files in many states with varying open years under statute.
63
Note 12 – Derivatives
:
In accordance with the guidance on derivatives and hedging, NNN records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.
NNN’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, NNN primarily uses treasury locks, forward swaps and interest rate swaps as part of its cash flow hedging strategy. Treasury locks and forward starting swaps are used to hedge forecasted debt issuances. Treasury locks designated as cash flow hedges lock in the yield/price of a treasury security. Forward swaps also lock the associated swap spread. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges are used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with floating rate debt and involve the receipt or payment of variable rate amounts in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying principal amount.
For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings.
NNN discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, the derivative is re-designated as a hedging instrument or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.
When hedge accounting is discontinued, NNN recognizes any changes in its fair value in earnings and continues to carry the derivative on the balance sheet or may choose to settle the derivative at that time with a cash payment or receipt.
The following table outlines NNN's derivatives which were hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on forecasted issuance of long-term debt (dollars in thousands):
Terminated
Description
Aggregate Notional Amount
Liability (Asset) Fair Value When Terminated
Fair Value Deferred In Other Comprehensive Income
(1)
September 2007
Two treasury locks
$
100,000
$
3,260
$
3,228
June 2011
Two treasury locks
150,000
5,300
5,218
April 2013
Four forward starting swaps
240,000
3,156
3,141
May 2014
Three forward starting swaps
225,000
6,312
6,312
October 2015
Four forward starting swaps
300,000
13,369
13,369
December 2016
Two forward starting swaps
180,000
(13,352
)
(13,345
)
(1)
The amount reported in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on the related notes payable.
As of
December 31, 2016
,
$8,899,000
remains in other comprehensive income related to the effective portion of NNN’s previous interest rate hedges. During the years ended
December 31,
2016
,
2015
and
2014
, NNN reclassified
$2,802,000
,
$1,902,000
and
$1,129,000
out of other comprehensive income as an increase to interest expense. Over the next
12
months, NNN estimates that an additional
$1,746,000
will be reclassified as an increase in interest expense. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on NNN’s long-term debt.
NNN does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes or currently have any derivatives that are not designated as hedges. NNN had
no
derivative financial instruments outstanding at
December 31, 2016
.
64
Note 13 – Performance Incentive Plan
:
In June 2007, NNN filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Commission which permits the issuance of up to
5,900,000
shares of common stock pursuant to NNN’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan replaced NNN’s previous Performance Incentive Plan. The 2007 Plan allows NNN to award or grant to key employees, directors and persons performing consulting or advisory services for NNN or its affiliates, stock options, stock awards, stock appreciation rights, Phantom Stock Awards, Performance Awards and Leveraged Stock Purchase Awards, each as defined in the 2007 Plan.
There were
no
stock options outstanding or exercisable at
December 31, 2016
.
Pursuant to the 2007 Plan, NNN has granted and issued shares of restricted stock to certain officers and key associates of NNN. The following summarizes the restricted stock activity for the year ended
December 31, 2016
:
Number
of
Shares
Weighted
Average
Share Price
Non-vested restricted shares, January 1
896,667
$
35.13
Restricted shares granted
269,448
44.70
Restricted shares vested
(247,106
)
33.33
Restricted shares forfeited
(38,138
)
33.93
Restricted shares repurchased
(9,153
)
28.94
Non-vested restricted shares, December 31
871,718
$
38.88
Compensation expense for the restricted stock which is not contingent upon NNN’s performance goals is determined based upon the fair value at the date of grant and is recognized as the greater of the amount amortized over a straight lined basis or the amount vested over the vesting periods. Vesting periods for officers and key associates of NNN range from
three
to
five
years and generally vest annually. NNN recognizes compensation expense on a straight-line basis for awards with only service conditions.
During the years ended
December 31
,
2016
and
2015
, NNN granted
142,199
and
145,916
, respectively, performance based shares subject to its total stockholder return growth after a
three years
period relative to its peers. The shares were granted to certain executive officers and had weighted average grant price of
$44.70
and
$41.00
, respectively, per share. Once the performance criteria are met and the actual number of shares earned is determined, the shares vest immediately. For the
2016
and
2015
grants, the conditions are based on market conditions, and the fair value was determined at the grant date (for a fair value share price of
$34.60
and
$22.72
, respectively). Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period for both grants.
The following summarizes other grants made during the year ended
December 31, 2016
, pursuant to the 2007 Plan.
Shares
Weighted
Average
Share Price
Other share grants under the 2007 Plan:
Directors’ fees
16,125
$
45.27
Deferred directors’ fees
17,565
45.60
33,690
$
45.44
Shares available under the 2007 Plan for grant, end of period
3,088,970
The total compensation expense for share-based payments for the years ended
December 31
,
2016
,
2015
and
2014
totaled
$10,758,000
,
$9,671,000
and
$9,224,000
, respectively. At December 31, 2016, NNN had
$13,398,000
of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements under the 2007 Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.4
years. In addition, NNN recognized
no
performance based long-term incentive cash compensation expense for the years ended December 31,
2016
,
2015
and
2014
.
65
Note 14 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments
:
NNN believes the carrying value of its Credit Facility approximates fair value based upon its nature, terms and variable interest rate. NNN believes that the carrying value of its mortgages and notes receivable and mortgages payable at
December 31,
2016
and
2015
, approximate fair value based upon current market prices of comparable instruments (Level 3). At
December 31,
2016
and
2015
, the carrying value and fair value of NNN’s notes payable net of unamortized discount and excluding debt costs, was
$2,367,102,000
and
$2,007,242,000
, respectively, based upon quoted market prices, which is a Level 1 valuation since NNN's debt is publicly traded.
Note 15 – Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
:
The following table outlines NNN’s quarterly financial data (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
2016
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Revenues as originally reported
$
126,999
$
130,998
$
134,558
$
141,261
Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders
$
70,683
$
51,942
$
50,784
$
66,092
Net earnings per share
(1)
:
Basic
$
0.44
$
0.30
$
0.29
$
0.37
Diluted
0.44
0.30
0.28
0.37
2015
Revenues as originally reported
$
116,187
$
117,208
$
123,143
$
126,377
Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders
$
53,978
$
46,188
$
55,198
$
42,471
Net earnings per share
(1)
:
Basic
$
0.34
$
0.28
$
0.34
$
0.24
Diluted
0.34
0.28
0.34
0.24
(1)
Calculated independently for each period and consequently, the sum of the quarters may differ from the annual amount.
Note 16 – Segment Information
:
For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, NNN’s operations are reported within
one
business segment in the consolidated financial statements and all properties are part of the Properties or Property Portfolio.
Note 17 – Fair Value Measurements
:
As of December 31, 2016, NNN holds the Residuals from
two
loan securitizations. Each of the Residuals is recorded at estimated fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders' equity and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment.
66
NNN values its Residuals using a discounted cash flow analysis based upon estimated prepayment speeds, expected loan losses and yield curves. These valuation inputs are generally considered unobservable; therefore, the Residuals are considered Level 3 financial assets. The table below presents a rollforward of the Residuals during the
year ended
December 31, 2016
(dollars in thousands):
Balance at beginning of year
$
11,115
Total gains (losses) – realized/unrealized:
Included in earnings
(6,983
)
Included in other comprehensive income
(4,454
)
Interest income on Residuals
1,677
Cash received from Residuals
(1,319
)
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net
—
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
—
Balance at end of year
$
36
Changes in gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to a change
in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the end of
period
$
4,272
Note 18 – Major Tenants
:
As of
December 31, 2016
, NNN had
no
tenants that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental and earned income.
Note 19 – Commitments and Contingencies
:
A summary of NNN's commitments are included in Note 2 – Real Estate.
In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various other legal actions which management believes are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management does not believe that any of these proceedings are material to NNN's consolidated financial statements.
Note 20 – Subsequent Events
:
NNN reviewed all subsequent events and transactions that have occurred after
December 31, 2016
, the date of the consolidated balance sheet.
In January 2017, NNN announced the redemption of all outstanding depositary shares representing interests in its
6.625%
Series D Preferred Stock. The depositary shares will be redeemed on February 23, 2017 at
$25.00
per depositary share, plus all accrued and unpaid dividends through the redemption date, for an aggregate redemption price of
$25.3128472
per depositary share. NNN will record a preferred stock redemption charge of
$9,855,000
, which is the excess carrying amount of preferred stock to be redeemed over the cash to be paid to redeem the Series D Preferred Stock. After the redemption date, dividends on the depositary shares representing interests in the Series D Preferred Stock will cease to accrue.
In February 2017, the Company entered into one forward starting swap with a total notional amount of
$125,000,000
to hedge the risk of changes in the interest-related cash outflows associated with the potential issuance of long-term debt. The outstanding forward starting swap was designated as a cash flow hedge.
There were no other reportable subsequent events or transactions.
67
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Process for Assessment and Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financing Reporting.
NNN carried out an assessment as of
December 31, 2016
, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting. This assessment was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) require NNN to present the conclusions of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer about the effectiveness of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the conclusions of NNN’s management about the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.
CEO and CFO Certifications.
Included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forms of “Certification” of NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The forms of Certification are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K that stockholders are currently reading is the information concerning the assessment referred to in the Section 302 certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in NNN’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to NNN’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, and affected by NNN’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and includes those policies and procedures that:
•
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of NNN’s assets;
•
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that NNN’s receipts and expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of management or the Board of Directors; and
•
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of NNN’s assets that could have a material adverse effect on NNN’s financial statements.
Scope of the Assessments.
The assessment by NNN’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the assessment by NNN’s management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting included a review of procedures and discussions with NNN’s management and others at NNN. In the course of the assessments, NNN sought to identify data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, were being undertaken.
NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is also assessed on an ongoing basis by personnel in NNN’s Accounting department and by NNN’s internal auditors in connection with their internal audit activities. The overall goals of these various assessment activities are to monitor NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting and to make modifications as necessary. NNN’s intent in this regard is that the disclosure controls and procedures and the internal control over financial reporting will be maintained and updated (including with improvements and corrections) as conditions warrant. Management also sought to deal with other control matters in the assessment, and in each case if a problem was identified, management considered what revision, improvement and/or correction was necessary to be made in accordance
68
with NNN’s on-going procedures. The assessments of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is done on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning effectiveness of those controls can be reported in NNN’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Assessment of Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer have concluded that, as of
December 31, 2016
, NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for NNN. Management used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – 2013 Integrated Framework to assess the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting. Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of
December 31, 2016
, NNN’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Ernst & Young LLP, NNN’s independent registered public accounting firm, audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in connection therewith has issued an attestation report on NNN’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
During the three months ended
December 31, 2016
, there were no changes in NNN’s internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, NNN’s internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls.
Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, do not expect that NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures or NNN’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within NNN have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management’s override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Item 9B.
Other Information
None.
69
PART III
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is included in the Registrant's proxy statement including the information, without limitation, contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Nominees,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Executive Officers,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Code of Business Conduct and Insider Trading Policy” and “Security Ownership ”, and such information in such sections is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is included in the Registrant's proxy statement including the information, without limitation, contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Director Compensation,” “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report”, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is included in the Registrant's proxy statement including the information, without limitation, contained in the section thereof captioned “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information,” and “Security Ownership”, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is included in the Registrant's proxy statement including the information, without limitation, contained in the section thereof captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is included in the Registrant's proxy statement including the information, without limitation, contained in the section thereof captioned “Audit Committee Report” and “Proposal V: Ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”, and such information is incorporated herein by reference.
70
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
The following documents are filed as part of this report
(1)
Financial Statements
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
38
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015
40
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
41
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
43
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014
46
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
48
(2)
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization and Notes as of December 31, 2016
Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate and Notes as of December 31, 2016
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.
(3)
Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report.
3.
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
3.1
First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 6.625% Series D Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated February 21, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 23, 2012, incorporated herein by reference).
3.3
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 5.70% Series E Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated May 29, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 30, 2013, incorporated herein by reference).
3.4
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 5.20% Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 7, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2016, incorporated herein by reference).
3.5
Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated May 1, 2006, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.6
Second Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated December 13, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.7
Third Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated February 13, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 3.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
71
4.
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
4.1
Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).
4.2
Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.3
Specimen certificate representing the 6.625% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated February 22, 2012 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.4
Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.20 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.5
Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.6
Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.7
Form of Tenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.500% Notes due 2021 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.8
Form of 5.500% Notes due 2021 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.9
Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.80% Notes due 2022 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.1
Form of 3.800% Notes due 2022 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.11
Form of Twelfth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.300% Notes due 2023 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 9, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.12
Form of 3.300% Notes due 2023 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 9, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.13
Specimen certificate representing the 5.700% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.14
Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.15
Form of Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.900% Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
72
4.16
Form of 3.900% Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.17
Form of Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 4.000% Notes due 2025 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 26, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.18
Form of 4.000% Notes due 2025 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 26, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.19
Specimen certificate representing the 5.20% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 11, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.20
Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 11, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.21
Form of Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.60% Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.22
Form of 3.60% Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.
Material Contracts
10.1
2007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8
Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
73
10.10
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.13
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.14
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2011, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Performance between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Service between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.17
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Special Grant between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.18
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.19
Employment Agreement dated as of January 2, 2014, between the Registrant and Stephen A. Horn, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.20
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2014, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 28, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.21
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Performance between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.22
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Service - Non-Executives between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.23
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Service between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.24
Retirement and Transition Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2016, between the registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 30, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
74
10.25
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2016, between the registrant and Julian Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 30, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
12.
Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).
21.
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).
23.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
23.1
Ernst & Young LLP dated February 13, 2017 (filed herewith).
24.
Power of Attorney (included on signature page).
31.
Section 302 Certifications
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.
Section 906 Certifications
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
99.
Additional Exhibits
99.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).
101.
Interactive Data File
101.1
The following materials from National Retail Properties, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016, are formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of comprehensive income, (iii) consolidated statements of stockholders' equity (iv) consolidated statements of cash flows, and (v) notes to consolidated financial statements.
75
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the
13th day of February, 2017
.
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.
By:
/s/ Craig Macnab
Craig Macnab
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
76
POWER OF ATTORNEY
Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints each of Craig Macnab, Kevin B. Habicht and Michelle L. Miller as his or her attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this report and to file same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, granting unto such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/ Craig Macnab
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
February 13, 2017
Craig Macnab
/s/ Robert C. Legler
Lead Director
February 13, 2017
Robert C. Legler
/s/ Pamela K. Beall
Director
February 13, 2017
Pamela K. Beall
/s/ Steven D. Cosler
Director
February 13, 2017
Steven D. Cosler
/s/ Don DeFosset
Director
February 13, 2017
Don DeFosset
/s/ David M. Fick
Director
February 13, 2017
David M. Fick
/s/ Edward J. Fritsch
Director
February 13, 2017
Edward J. Fritsch
/s/ Sam L. Susser
Director
February 13, 2017
Sam L. Susser
/s/ Kevin B. Habicht
Director, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer),
Executive Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Treasurer
February 13, 2017
Kevin B. Habicht
/s/ Michelle L. Miller
Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) and Executive Vice President
February 13, 2017
Michelle L. Miller
77
Exhibit Index
3.
Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
3.1
First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 3, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 6.625% Series D Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated February 21, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 23, 2012, incorporated herein by reference).
3.3
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 5.70% Series E Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated May 29, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 30, 2013, incorporated herein by reference).
3.4
Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 5.20% Series F Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 7, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2016, incorporated herein by reference).
3.5
Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated May 1, 2006, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.6
Second Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated December 13, 2007 (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.7
Third Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, dated February 13, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 3.6 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
4.1
Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).
4.2
Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.3
Specimen certificate representing the 6.625% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated February 22, 2012 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.4
Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.20 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.5
Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.6
Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.7
Form of Tenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.500% Notes due 2021 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
78
4.18
Form of 5.500% Notes due 2021 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 6, 2011 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.9
Form of Eleventh Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.80% Notes due 2022 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.10
Form of 3.800% Notes due 2022 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 14, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.11
Form of Twelfth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.300% Notes due 2023 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 9, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.12
Form of 3.300% Notes due 2023 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 9, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.13
Specimen certificate representing the 5.700% Series E Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.14
Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 30, 2013 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.15
Form of Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.900% Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.16
Form of 3.900% Notes due 2024 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.17
Form of Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 4.000% Notes due 2025 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 26, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.18
Form of 4.000% Notes due 2025 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 26, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.19
Specimen certificate representing the 5.20% Series F Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 11, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.20
Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 11, 2016 and incorporated herein by reference).
4.21
Form of Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.60% Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
4.22
Form of 3.60% Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
79
10.
Material Contracts
10.1
2007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.3
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.5
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.6
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.7
Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.8
Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.9
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.10
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.11 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.11
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.12
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.13
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.14
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2011, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 6, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.15
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Performance between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.16
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Service between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
80
10.17
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Service between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.18
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 31, 2012, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.19
Employment Agreement dated as of January 2, 2014, between the Registrant and Stephen A. Horn, Jr. (filed as Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 19, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.20
Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2014, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 28, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.21
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Performance between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.22
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Service - Non-Executives between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as exhibit 10.22 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.23
Form of Restricted Award Agreement - Service between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as exhibit 10.23 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 2, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.24
Retirement and Transition Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2016, between the registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 30, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.25
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2016, between the registrant and Julian Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 30, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).
12.
Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).
21.
Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).
23.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
23.1
Ernst & Young LLP dated February 13, 2017 (filed herewith).
24.
Power of Attorney (included on signature page).
31.
Section 302 Certifications
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.
Section 906 Certifications
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
99.
Additional Exhibits
99.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).
81
101.
Interactive Data File
101.1
The following materials from National Retail Properties, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016, are formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) consolidated balance sheets, (ii) consolidated statements of comprehensive income, (iii) consolidated statements of stockholders' equity (iv) consolidated statements of cash flows, and (v) notes to consolidated financial statements.
82
Table of Contents
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
December 31, 2016
(Dollars in thousands)
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
7-Eleven:
Tampa, FL
$
—
$
1,081
$
917
$
—
$
—
$
1,070
$
917
$
1,987
$
408
1999
12/98
(g)
40
Austin, TX
—
1,101
2,987
—
—
1,101
2,987
4,088
437
2006
11/11
35
Austin, TX
—
900
3,571
—
—
900
3,571
4,471
523
2004
11/11
35
Austin, TX
—
259
1,361
—
—
259
1,361
1,620
279
1985
11/11
25
Beaumont, TX
—
115
1,543
—
—
115
1,543
1,658
264
1996
11/11
30
Beaumont, TX
—
124
2,968
—
—
124
2,968
3,092
507
1996
11/11
30
Beaumont, TX
—
239
2,031
—
—
239
2,031
2,270
297
2002
11/11
35
Bloomington, TX
—
38
3,093
—
—
38
3,093
3,131
634
1985
11/11
25
Bryan, TX
—
479
3,561
—
—
479
3,561
4,040
608
2000
11/11
30
Canyon Lake, TX
—
144
1,830
—
—
144
1,830
1,974
375
1977
11/11
25
Cedar Park, TX
—
833
1,705
—
—
833
1,705
2,538
250
2002
11/11
35
College Station, TX
—
393
3,342
—
—
393
3,342
3,735
571
2000
11/11
30
Corpus Christi, TX
—
412
2,356
—
—
412
2,356
2,768
402
1999
11/11
30
Corpus Christi, TX
—
450
1,370
—
—
450
1,370
1,820
234
1996
11/11
30
Corpus Christi, TX
—
383
3,093
—
—
383
3,093
3,476
453
2006
11/11
35
Corpus Christi, TX
—
661
2,624
—
—
661
2,624
3,285
448
1999
11/11
30
Edinburg, TX
—
431
2,193
—
—
431
2,193
2,624
375
1999
11/11
30
Edna, TX
—
67
1,897
—
—
67
1,897
1,964
389
1976
11/11
25
Harlingen, TX
—
230
2,356
—
—
230
2,356
2,586
402
2000
11/11
30
Kingsland, TX
—
153
2,691
—
—
153
2,691
2,844
552
1972
11/11
25
Kingsville, TX
—
163
1,485
—
—
163
1,485
1,648
305
1990
11/11
25
Laredo, TX
—
938
5,829
—
—
938
5,829
6,767
996
1995
11/11
30
Laredo, TX
—
441
1,935
—
—
441
1,935
2,376
283
2002
11/11
35
Laredo, TX
—
335
2,509
—
—
335
2,509
2,844
429
1999
11/11
30
Laredo, TX
—
412
1,476
—
—
412
1,476
1,888
252
2001
11/11
30
Laredo, TX
—
421
3,016
—
—
421
3,016
3,437
515
1998
11/11
30
Mercedes, TX
—
556
1,523
—
—
556
1,523
2,079
260
1998
11/11
30
Palacios, TX
—
29
1,667
—
—
29
1,667
1,696
342
1984
11/11
25
Pflugerville, TX
—
996
2,336
—
—
996
2,336
3,332
342
2002
11/11
35
Portland, TX
—
488
4,710
—
—
488
4,710
5,198
805
1999
11/11
30
Rio Bravo, TX
—
355
1,351
—
—
355
1,351
1,706
198
2002
11/11
35
Rockport, TX
—
660
4,269
—
—
660
4,269
4,929
625
2008
11/11
35
Round Rock, TX
—
661
1,140
—
—
661
1,140
1,801
195
2000
11/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
441
1,313
—
—
441
1,313
1,754
224
1999
11/11
30
San Juan, TX
—
565
1,179
—
—
565
1,179
1,744
201
1999
11/11
30
Victoria, TX
—
259
2,346
—
—
259
2,346
2,605
401
1984
11/11
30
Victoria, TX
—
431
2,298
—
—
431
2,298
2,729
393
1986
11/11
30
West Orange, TX
—
220
2,088
—
—
220
2,088
2,308
357
1993
11/11
30
Winnie, TX
—
115
4,566
—
—
115
4,566
4,681
669
2002
11/11
35
Austin, TX
—
612
2,775
—
—
612
2,775
3,387
466
1999
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
488
2,163
—
—
488
2,163
2,651
363
2000
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
938
1,436
—
—
938
1,436
2,374
241
1998
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
756
2,870
—
—
756
2,870
3,626
482
1999
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
775
4,677
—
—
775
4,677
5,452
786
1996
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
880
1,790
—
—
880
1,790
2,670
301
1998
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
861
3,004
—
—
861
3,004
3,865
505
2001
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
1,215
4,524
—
—
1,215
4,524
5,739
652
2004
12/11
35
Austin, TX
—
612
3,061
—
—
612
3,061
3,673
514
1999
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
689
1,732
—
—
689
1,732
2,421
291
1999
12/11
30
Austin, TX
—
679
1,905
—
—
679
1,905
2,584
320
1999
12/11
30
Cedar Park, TX
—
536
1,914
—
—
536
1,914
2,450
322
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
411
2,555
—
—
411
2,555
2,966
429
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
766
1,474
—
—
766
1,474
2,240
248
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
899
2,593
—
—
899
2,593
3,492
373
2002
12/11
35
San Antonio, TX
—
909
1,359
—
—
909
1,359
2,268
228
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
985
3,253
—
—
985
3,253
4,238
547
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
469
2,727
—
—
469
2,727
3,196
458
1998
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
919
2,344
—
—
919
2,344
3,263
338
2002
12/11
35
San Antonio, TX
—
631
2,851
—
—
631
2,851
3,482
479
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
517
2,670
—
—
517
2,670
3,187
449
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
947
2,535
—
—
947
2,535
3,482
426
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
603
2,048
—
—
603
2,048
2,651
344
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
632
1,991
—
—
632
1,991
2,623
335
2001
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
679
2,937
—
—
679
2,937
3,616
494
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
545
3,148
—
—
545
3,148
3,693
529
1999
12/11
30
San Antonio, TX
—
412
2,010
—
—
412
2,010
2,422
338
1999
12/11
30
Universal City, TX
—
699
1,675
—
—
699
1,675
2,374
281
2001
12/11
30
Belpre, OH
—
408
759
—
—
408
759
1,167
75
1990
07/14
25
Charleston, WV
—
689
974
—
—
689
974
1,663
80
1970
07/14
30
Charleston, WV
—
549
729
—
—
549
729
1,278
60
1995
07/14
30
Clarksburg, WV
—
390
613
—
—
390
613
1,003
60
1978
07/14
25
Mannington, WV
—
218
745
—
—
218
745
963
61
1996
07/14
30
N. Belle Vernon, PA
—
438
1,165
—
—
438
1,165
1,603
115
1996
07/14
25
New Castle, PA
—
292
617
—
—
292
617
909
51
1983
07/14
30
Parkersburg, WV
—
298
782
—
—
298
782
1,080
77
1988
07/14
25
Parkersburg, WV
—
422
739
—
—
422
739
1,161
61
1985
07/14
30
Weston, WV
—
114
583
—
—
114
583
697
48
1995
07/14
30
Aaron's:
Memphis, TN
—
820
—
2,598
—
820
2,598
3,418
1,177
1998
12/97
(g)
40
Academy:
Franklin, TN
—
1,807
2,108
—
—
1,589
2,108
3,697
811
1999
06/05
30
Ace Hardware and Lighting:
Bourbonnais, IL
—
298
1,329
—
—
298
1,329
1,627
549
1997
11/98
37
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-1
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Advance Auto Parts:
Miami, FL
—
867
—
1,035
—
867
1,035
1,902
299
2005
12/04
(g)
40
Richmond, VA
—
193
1,268
—
—
193
1,268
1,461
122
2008
02/14
30
Adventure Landing:
Jacksonville Beach, FL
—
3,615
5,636
—
—
3,615
5,636
9,251
1,861
1995
04/11
30
Jacksonville, FL
—
721
861
—
—
721
861
1,582
407
1983
04/11
25
Raleigh, NC
—
1,841
3,124
—
—
1,841
3,124
4,965
992
1989
04/11
25
St. Augustine, FL
—
797
289
—
—
797
289
1,086
200
1999
04/11
30
Tonawanda, NY
—
205
927
—
—
205
927
1,132
429
1991
04/11
25
Affordable Care:
Asheville, NC
—
467
576
—
—
467
576
1,043
47
2005
07/14
30
Conover, NC
—
187
623
—
—
187
623
810
51
2002
07/14
30
Poland, OH
—
231
650
—
—
231
650
881
64
2001
07/14
25
Wilmington, NC
—
398
565
—
—
398
565
963
46
2002
07/14
30
Ajuua Mexican Restaurant:
Aurora, CO
—
1,168
1,105
22
—
1,168
1,127
2,295
426
2000
06/05
30
Aldi:
Cutler Bay, FL
—
989
1,479
205
—
989
1,684
2,673
800
1995
06/96
40
All Star Sports:
Wichita, KS
—
3,275
1,631
167
—
3,275
1,798
5,073
413
1988
05/07
40
Wichita, KS
—
1,551
965
152
—
1,551
1,117
2,668
251
1987
05/07
40
Amazing Jake's:
Plano, TX
—
5,705
17,049
18
—
5,705
17,067
22,772
4,123
1982
07/08
35
AMC Theatre:
Bloomington, IN
—
2,338
4,000
—
—
2,338
4,000
6,338
1,487
1987
09/07
25
Brighton, CO
—
1,070
5,491
1,500
—
1,070
6,991
8,061
1,286
2005
09/07
40
Castle Rock, CO
—
2,905
5,002
—
—
2,905
5,002
7,907
1,162
2005
09/07
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-2
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Evansville, IN
—
1,300
4,269
3,400
—
1,300
7,669
8,969
1,160
1999
09/07
35
Galesburg, IL
—
1,205
2,441
—
—
1,205
2,441
3,646
567
2003
09/07
40
Machesney Park, IL
—
3,018
8,770
—
—
3,018
8,770
11,788
2,037
2005
09/07
40
Michigan City, IN
—
1,996
8,422
—
—
1,996
8,422
10,418
1,956
2005
09/07
40
Muncie, IN
—
1,243
5,512
—
—
1,243
5,512
6,755
1,280
2005
09/07
40
Naperville, IL
—
6,141
11,624
—
—
6,141
11,624
17,765
2,700
2006
09/07
40
New Lenox, IL
—
6,778
10,980
—
—
6,778
10,980
17,758
2,551
2004
09/07
40
Chicago, IL
—
7,257
10,955
—
—
7,257
10,955
18,212
2,453
2007
01/08
40
Johnson Creek, WI
—
1,433
3,932
—
—
1,433
3,932
5,365
1,006
1997
01/08
35
Lake Delton, WI
—
2,063
8,366
—
—
2,063
8,366
10,429
2,141
1999
01/08
35
Quincy, IL
—
1,297
2,850
—
—
1,297
2,850
4,147
729
1982
01/08
35
Schererville, IN
—
6,619
14,225
—
—
6,619
14,225
20,844
4,248
1996
01/08
30
West Jordan, UT
—
3,302
245
3,117
—
3,302
3,362
6,664
98
2015
05/15
(m)
30
American Auto Auction:
El Paso, TX
—
2,858
1,133
—
—
2,858
1,133
3,991
25
1987
06/16
25
Jenison, MI
—
1,334
3,513
—
—
1,334
3,513
4,847
29
1984
10/16
25
Lubbock, TX
—
301
1,507
—
—
301
1,507
1,808
8
1980
11/16
25
American Family Care:
Mobile, AL
—
843
562
348
—
843
910
1,753
269
1997
12/01
40
Alcoa, TN
—
1,221
—
1,730
—
1,221
1,730
2,951
142
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Cullman, AL
—
541
—
1,517
—
541
1,517
2,058
122
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Decatur, AL
—
460
1,283
—
—
460
1,283
1,743
148
2010
12/12
35
Nashville, TN
—
377
—
1,403
—
377
1,403
1,780
107
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Pace, FL
—
738
—
1,459
—
738
1,459
2,197
117
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Woodstock, GA
—
563
—
1,653
—
563
1,653
2,216
119
2014
12/12
(m)
40
Fairhope, AL
—
(l)
1,929
—
—
(l)
1,929
1,929
187
2012
02/13
40
Dothan, AL
—
667
—
1,400
—
667
1,400
2,067
115
2013
02/13
(m)
40
Auburn, AL
—
663
—
1,835
—
663
1,835
2,498
140
2013
03/13
(m)
40
Milton, GA
—
577
1,526
—
—
577
1,526
2,103
145
2012
03/13
40
Roswell, GA
—
814
—
1,851
—
816
1,851
2,667
110
2014
04/13
(m)
40
Marietta, GA
—
432
—
1,846
—
432
1,846
2,278
133
2014
04/13
(m)
40
Mt. Juliet, TN
—
875
1,566
—
—
875
1,566
2,441
135
2013
07/13
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-3
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Chattanooga, TN
—
469
—
1,626
—
469
1,626
2,095
117
2014
07/13
(m)
40
Columbus, GA
—
550
—
1,520
—
550
1,520
2,070
109
2014
07/13
(m)
40
Birmingham, AL
—
445
—
1,640
—
445
1,640
2,085
121
2005
08/13
(o)
40
Hendersonville, TN
—
660
1,640
—
—
660
1,640
2,300
128
2013
11/13
40
Calera, AL
—
606
—
1,673
—
606
1,673
2,279
103
2014
12/13
(m)
40
Spring Hill, TN
—
589
—
1,718
—
589
1,718
2,307
95
2014
02/14
(m)
40
Athens, AL
—
497
—
1,834
—
497
1,834
2,331
94
2014
03/14
(m)
40
Panama City Beach, FL
—
995
—
1,745
—
995
1,745
2,740
93
2014
04/14
(m)
40
Gadsden, AL
—
527
—
1,565
—
527
1,565
2,092
80
2014
05/14
40
Knoxville, TN
—
2,021
—
2,014
—
2,021
2,014
4,035
70
2015
08/14
(m)
40
Fort Oglethorpe, GA
—
736
—
1,832
—
736
1,832
2,568
74
2015
08/14
(m)
40
Enterprise, AL
—
570
—
1,703
—
570
1,703
2,273
51
2015
01/15
(m)
40
American Freight:
Glen Allen, VA
—
889
1,948
—
—
889
1,948
2,837
1,003
1996
05/96
40
American Retail Service:
Lincoln City, OR
—
1,099
1,560
—
—
1,099
1,560
2,659
252
1973
12/12
25
Salem, OR
—
433
1,627
735
—
433
2,362
2,795
277
1999
12/12
(o)
40
Yuma, AZ
—
1,118
1,878
—
—
1,118
1,878
2,996
304
1987
12/12
25
Amoco:
Miami, FL
—
969
—
—
—
969
(i)
969
(i)
(i)
05/03
(i)
Sunrise, FL
—
949
—
—
—
949
(i)
949
(i)
(i)
06/03
(i)
Deerfield Beach, FL
—
770
274
26
—
770
300
1,070
79
1980
12/05
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-4
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Amscot:
Tampa, FL
—
1,160
352
—
—
1,160
352
1,512
99
1981
10/05
40
Orlando, FL
—
764
—
891
—
764
891
1,655
234
2006
12/05
40
Orlando, FL
—
664
1,011
—
—
664
983
1,647
254
2006
12/05
(g)
40
Orlando, FL
—
358
—
900
—
358
900
1,258
238
2006
02/06
(g)
40
Orlando, FL
—
546
—
872
—
546
872
1,418
234
2006
02/06
(g)
40
Clearwater, FL
—
456
332
—
—
456
332
788
85
1967
09/06
40
Applebee's:
Ballwin, MO
—
1,496
1,404
—
—
1,496
1,404
2,900
528
1995
12/01
40
Cincinnati, OH
—
312
898
—
—
312
898
1,210
191
2002
08/10
30
Crestview Hills, KY
—
1,069
1,367
—
—
1,069
1,367
2,436
349
1993
08/10
25
Danville, KY
—
641
1,645
—
—
641
1,645
2,286
349
2003
08/10
30
Florence, KY
—
1,075
1,488
—
—
1,075
1,488
2,563
379
1988
08/10
25
Frankfort, KY
—
862
1,610
—
—
862
1,610
2,472
342
1993
08/10
30
Georgetown, KY
—
809
1,437
—
—
809
1,437
2,246
305
2001
08/10
30
Hilliard, OH
—
808
1,846
—
—
808
1,846
2,654
392
1998
08/10
30
Mason, OH
—
545
941
—
—
545
941
1,486
200
1997
08/10
30
Maysville, KY
—
513
1,387
—
—
513
1,387
1,900
253
2005
08/10
35
Nicholasville, KY
—
454
1,077
—
—
454
1,077
1,531
229
2000
08/10
30
Troy, OH
—
645
862
—
—
645
862
1,507
220
1996
08/10
25
Grove City, OH
—
511
1,415
—
—
511
1,415
1,926
293
1990
10/10
30
Kettering, OH
—
359
1,043
—
—
359
1,043
1,402
185
2005
10/10
35
Mesa, AZ
—
748
1,734
—
—
748
1,734
2,482
359
1998
10/10
30
Mt. Sterling, KY
—
510
1,392
—
—
510
1,392
1,902
247
2000
10/10
35
Phoenix, AZ
—
781
1,456
—
—
781
1,456
2,237
301
1995
10/10
30
Phoenix, AZ
—
458
1,099
—
—
458
1,099
1,557
195
2004
10/10
35
Angola, IN
—
478
1,533
—
—
478
1,533
2,011
108
2002
07/14
35
Arby's:
Colorado Springs, CO
—
206
534
—
—
206
534
740
201
1998
12/01
40
Thomson, GA
—
268
504
—
—
268
504
772
189
1997
12/01
40
Washington Courthouse, OH
—
157
546
—
—
157
546
703
205
1998
12/01
40
Whitmore Lake, MI
—
171
469
—
—
171
469
640
176
1993
12/01
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-5
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Indianapolis, IN
—
285
686
—
—
285
686
971
56
1998
07/14
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
456
830
—
—
456
830
1,286
58
2005
07/14
35
Madison, GA
—
242
697
—
—
242
697
939
52
1985
02/15
25
Muncie, IN
—
400
876
—
—
400
876
1,276
52
1995
03/15
30
Gordonsville, TN
—
408
1,077
—
—
408
1,077
1,485
37
2009
12/15
30
ARCO ampm:
Casa Grande, AZ
—
2,340
1,894
83
—
2,340
1,905
4,245
477
1993
05/08
35
Gilbert, AZ
—
1,317
1,304
85
—
1,166
1,325
2,491
341
1996
05/08
35
Globe, AZ
—
762
2,148
114
—
762
2,180
2,942
559
1998
05/08
35
Mesa, AZ
—
1,332
1,367
92
—
1,156
1,385
2,541
410
1986
05/08
30
Mesa, AZ
—
2,219
2,140
89
—
2,219
2,170
4,389
489
2000
05/08
40
Prescott, AZ
—
1,266
1,261
118
—
1,266
1,294
2,560
342
1997
05/08
35
Scottsdale, AZ
—
1,529
1,373
240
—
1,529
1,451
2,980
412
1999
05/08
35
Sedona, AZ
—
1,281
1,324
107
—
1,281
1,345
2,626
305
2000
05/08
40
Tucson, AZ
—
1,105
1,336
111
—
1,105
1,358
2,463
350
1992
05/08
35
Tucson, AZ
—
1,083
1,599
86
—
1,083
1,620
2,703
414
1992
05/08
35
Tucson, AZ
—
1,457
1,619
125
—
1,457
1,651
3,108
429
1995
05/08
35
Tucson, AZ
—
1,223
1,911
102
—
1,223
1,932
3,155
491
1996
05/08
35
Soldotna, AK
—
180
891
—
—
180
891
1,071
88
1985
07/14
25
Ashley Furniture:
Altamonte Springs, FL
—
2,906
4,877
315
—
2,906
5,192
8,098
2,481
1997
09/97
40
Florissant, MO
—
896
1,057
3,058
—
899
4,113
5,012
762
1996
04/03
(g)
40
Louisville, KY
—
1,667
4,989
—
—
1,667
4,989
6,656
1,471
2005
03/05
40
At Home:
Douglasville, GA
—
1,588
3,916
—
—
1,588
3,916
5,504
889
1987
06/12
20
Humble, TX
—
3,559
5,046
—
—
3,559
5,046
8,605
917
2001
06/12
25
Noblesville, IN
—
1,870
4,241
—
—
1,870
4,241
6,111
963
1995
06/12
20
Sandston, VA
—
1,972
6,599
—
—
1,972
6,599
8,571
1,199
1996
06/12
25
Greensboro, NC
—
2,121
6,460
—
—
2,121
6,460
8,581
870
1998
12/12
30
Greenville, SC
—
1,892
5,404
—
—
1,727
5,404
7,131
513
1996
08/14
25
Hilliard, OH
—
1,747
4,642
—
—
1,836
4,514
6,350
399
1994
10/14
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-6
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
San Antonio, TX
—
3,818
5,922
—
—
3,818
5,922
9,740
304
1999
06/15
30
AT&T:
Cincinnati, OH
—
297
443
347
—
312
775
1,087
273
1999
06/98
40
Auto Solution:
Albuquerque, NM
—
1,113
—
1,443
—
1,113
1,443
2,556
410
2005
04/04
(f)
40
AutoZone:
Homestead, PA
—
500
—
105
—
605
(i)
605
(i)
(i)
02/97
(i)
Babies R Us:
Arlington, TX
—
831
2,612
—
—
831
2,612
3,443
1,339
1996
06/96
40
Bandana's BBQ:
St. Peters, MO
—
318
640
—
—
318
640
958
48
1981
02/15
25
BankUnited:
Orlando, FL
—
257
287
—
—
257
72
329
13
1988
07/92
30
Bar Louie:
Rochester, NY
—
792
1,535
204
—
792
1,739
2,531
372
1995
06/07
40
Barnes & Noble:
Brandon, FL
—
1,476
1,527
—
—
1,476
1,527
3,003
839
1995
08/94
(f)
40
Glendale, CO
—
3,245
2,722
—
—
3,245
2,722
5,967
1,514
1994
09/94
40
Houston, TX
—
3,308
2,396
—
—
3,308
2,396
5,704
1,273
1995
10/94
(f)
40
Plantation, FL
—
3,616
3,498
—
—
3,616
960
4,576
103
1996
05/95
(f)
30
Freehold, NJ (n)
—
2,917
2,261
—
—
2,917
2,261
5,178
1,182
1995
01/96
40
Dayton, OH
—
1,413
3,325
—
—
1,413
3,325
4,738
1,614
1996
05/97
40
Redding, CA
—
497
1,626
—
—
497
1,626
2,123
794
1997
06/97
40
Memphis, TN
—
1,574
2,242
—
—
1,574
2,242
3,816
724
1997
09/97
40
Marlton, NJ
—
2,831
4,319
—
—
2,709
4,319
7,028
1,957
1995
11/98
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-7
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Batteries Plus Bulbs:
Sunrise, FL
—
287
424
41
—
287
465
752
136
1979
05/04
40
Bealls:
Sarasota, FL
—
1,078
1,795
—
—
1,078
1,795
2,873
607
1996
09/97
40
Beautiful America Dry Cleaners:
Orlando, FL
—
40
111
—
—
40
111
151
36
2001
02/04
40
Bed Bath & Beyond:
Glen Allen, VA
—
1,184
2,843
179
—
1,184
3,021
4,205
1,073
1997
06/98
40
Glendale, AZ
—
1,082
—
2,758
—
1,082
2,758
3,840
1,204
1999
12/98
(g)
40
Midland, MI
—
231
—
2,705
—
231
2,705
2,936
685
2006
07/03
40
Colonie, NY
—
3,119
4,130
—
—
3,119
4,130
7,249
327
1967
08/14
30
BedMart:
Portland, OR
—
283
60
—
—
294
—
294
(e)
(e)
09/06
(e)
Best Buy:
Brandon, FL
—
2,985
2,772
—
—
2,985
2,772
5,757
1,377
1996
02/97
40
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
—
3,709
2,359
—
—
3,709
2,359
6,068
1,153
1970
06/97
40
Rockville, MD
—
6,233
3,419
—
—
6,233
3,419
9,652
1,663
1995
07/97
40
Fairfax, VA
—
3,052
3,218
—
—
3,052
3,218
6,270
1,559
1995
08/97
40
St. Petersburg, FL
—
4,032
2,611
—
—
4,032
2,611
6,643
1,088
1997
09/97
35
North Fayette, PA
—
2,331
2,293
—
—
2,331
2,293
4,624
1,063
1997
06/98
40
Denver, CO
—
8,882
4,373
—
—
8,882
4,373
13,255
1,699
1991
06/01
40
Albuquerque, NM
—
2,157
3,132
—
—
2,157
3,132
5,289
663
1992
09/11
25
Arlington, TX
—
1,372
3,890
—
—
1,372
3,890
5,262
823
1991
09/11
25
Beaumont, TX
—
614
2,177
—
—
614
2,177
2,791
576
1992
09/11
20
Dallas, TX (n)
—
906
—
—
—
906
—
906
(e)
(e)
09/11
(e)
Fort Collins, CO
—
2,054
3,346
—
—
2,054
3,346
5,400
708
1992
09/11
25
Fort Worth, TX
—
687
2,177
—
—
687
2,177
2,864
384
1992
09/11
30
Houston, TX
—
1,409
3,095
—
—
1,409
3,095
4,504
546
1992
09/11
30
Matteson, IL
—
384
2,089
—
—
384
2,089
2,473
553
1992
09/11
20
Nashua, NH
—
1,028
7,052
—
—
1,028
7,052
8,080
1,244
1999
09/11
30
North Attleborough, MA
—
2,761
4,165
—
—
2,761
4,165
6,926
735
1999
09/11
30
Schaumburg, IL
—
3,170
4,784
—
—
3,170
4,784
7,954
1,266
1965
09/11
20
Virginia Beach, VA
—
3,140
4,276
—
—
3,140
4,276
7,416
754
1999
09/11
30
Big Lots:
Dover, NJ
—
1,138
3,238
732
—
1,138
3,970
5,108
1,594
1995
11/98
40
BJ's Wholesale Club:
Orlando, FL
—
3,271
8,627
367
—
3,265
8,976
12,241
2,870
2001
02/04
40
Fairfax, VA
—
6,792
14,941
—
—
6,792
14,941
21,733
2,636
1992
09/11
30
Hamilton, NJ
—
3,166
29,373
—
—
3,166
29,373
32,539
4,441
2002
09/11
35
Hialeah, FL
—
4,792
14,067
—
—
4,792
14,067
18,859
2,481
2000
09/11
30
Roxbury, NJ
—
3,040
16,168
—
—
3,040
16,168
19,208
3,422
1993
09/11
25
W. Hartford, CT
—
2,846
14,299
—
—
2,846
14,299
17,145
2,522
1996
09/11
30
Cape Coral, FL
—
2,783
13,710
—
—
2,783
13,710
16,493
362
2005
03/16
30
Voorhees, NJ
—
3,103
14,055
—
—
3,103
14,055
17,158
332
2004
04/16
30
Blend Frozen Yogurt:
Lapeer, MI
—
63
457
—
—
63
436
499
105
2007
10/05
40
BMW:
Duluth, GA
—
4,434
4,080
6,559
—
4,504
10,639
15,143
3,032
1984
12/01
40
Bob Evans:
Amherst, NY
—
422
971
—
—
422
971
1,393
23
1994
04/16
30
Ashland, KY
—
383
913
—
—
383
913
1,296
22
2003
04/16
30
Avon, IN
—
432
609
—
—
432
609
1,041
14
2004
04/16
30
Baltimore, MD
—
1,138
196
—
—
1,138
196
1,334
5
1993
04/16
30
Batavia, NY
—
599
657
—
—
599
657
1,256
16
1996
04/16
30
Beachwood, OH
—
542
108
—
—
542
108
650
3
2004
04/16
30
Beavercreek, OH
—
570
334
—
—
570
334
904
8
2003
04/16
30
Beckley, WV
—
579
824
—
—
579
824
1,403
19
1992
04/16
30
Bel Air, MD
—
911
1,147
—
—
911
1,147
2,058
27
1995
04/16
30
Benton Harbor, MI
—
157
1,079
—
—
157
1,079
1,236
25
1989
04/16
30
Blue Springs, MO
—
550
462
—
—
550
462
1,012
11
1996
04/16
30
Brook Park, OH
—
570
570
—
—
570
570
1,140
13
2002
04/16
30
Camby, IN
—
510
932
—
—
510
932
1,442
22
2002
04/16
30
Canton, MI
—
776
167
—
—
776
167
943
4
2002
04/16
30
Canton, MI
—
804
589
—
—
804
589
1,393
14
2003
04/16
30
Chesterfield Twp, MI
—
746
491
—
—
746
491
1,237
12
2003
04/16
30
Chillicothe, OH
—
334
727
—
—
334
727
1,061
17
1995
04/16
30
Cincinnati, OH
—
482
295
—
—
482
295
777
7
1997
04/16
30
Cincinnati, OH
—
500
1,323
—
—
500
1,323
1,823
31
1999
04/16
30
Clarksville, IN
—
726
794
—
—
726
794
1,520
19
2000
04/16
30
Clearwater, FL
—
520
648
—
—
520
648
1,168
18
1986
04/16
25
Clermont, FL
—
1,011
49
—
—
1,011
49
1,060
1
2006
04/16
30
Coldwater, MI
—
324
1,020
—
—
324
1,020
1,344
29
1995
04/16
25
Columbia, MO
—
491
521
—
—
491
521
1,012
12
1997
04/16
30
Columbus, IN
—
696
1,117
—
—
696
1,117
1,813
23
2005
04/16
35
Columbus, OH
—
432
961
—
—
432
961
1,393
27
1985
04/16
25
Columbus, OH
—
647
1,010
—
—
647
1,010
1,657
24
1994
04/16
30
Corning, NY
—
196
1,412
—
—
196
1,412
1,608
33
1996
04/16
30
Cross Lanes, WV
—
354
600
—
—
354
600
954
17
1987
04/16
25
Dearborn, MI
—
560
579
—
—
560
579
1,139
16
1984
04/16
25
Dublin, OH
—
697
677
—
—
697
677
1,374
19
1985
04/16
25
Dublin, OH
—
804
559
—
—
804
559
1,363
13
1996
04/16
30
Dunkirk, NY
—
392
1,353
—
—
392
1,353
1,745
32
1994
04/16
30
Englewood, OH
—
794
696
—
—
794
696
1,490
20
1985
04/16
25
Erie, PA
—
941
902
—
—
941
902
1,843
26
1990
04/16
25
Erie, PA
—
451
765
—
—
451
765
1,216
18
1998
04/16
30
Fairfield, OH
—
138
776
—
—
138
776
914
18
1999
04/16
30
Fayetteville, WV
—
392
1,285
—
—
392
1,285
1,677
30
2006
04/16
30
Festus, MO
—
451
1,020
—
—
451
1,020
1,471
29
1990
04/16
25
Fort Wayne, IN
—
765
716
—
—
736
716
1,452
17
2003
04/16
30
Fort Wayne, IN
—
795
451
—
—
795
451
1,246
11
1997
04/16
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-8
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Franklin, IN
—
245
1,011
—
—
245
1,011
1,256
24
2003
04/16
30
Frederick, MD
—
491
491
—
—
491
491
982
12
1995
04/16
30
Gahanna, OH
—
755
1,176
—
—
755
1,176
1,931
28
1994
04/16
30
Gaylord, MI
—
618
922
—
—
618
922
1,540
22
1997
04/16
30
Greenfield, IN
—
246
766
—
—
246
766
1,012
18
1994
04/16
30
Greenwood, IN
—
481
883
—
—
481
883
1,364
21
2002
04/16
30
Groveport, OH
—
549
1,078
—
—
549
1,078
1,627
25
2003
04/16
30
Harborcreek, PA
—
510
609
—
—
510
609
1,119
14
2004
04/16
30
Heath, OH
—
363
1,323
—
—
363
1,323
1,686
37
1986
04/16
25
Hillsboro, OH
—
245
1,285
—
—
245
1,285
1,530
30
2004
04/16
30
Holland, OH
—
804
843
—
—
804
843
1,647
24
1987
04/16
25
Indianapolis, IN
—
569
1,157
—
—
569
1,157
1,726
27
2000
04/16
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
765
765
—
—
765
765
1,530
22
1985
04/16
25
Indianapolis, IN
—
559
1,088
—
—
559
1,088
1,647
26
2001
04/16
30
Jackson, MI
—
608
1,029
—
—
608
1,029
1,637
24
2002
04/16
30
Jacksonville, FL
—
696
696
—
—
696
696
1,392
16
2002
04/16
30
Jamestown, NY
—
334
697
—
—
334
697
1,031
16
1995
04/16
30
Lakeland, FL
—
618
540
—
—
618
540
1,158
13
2005
04/16
30
Lancaster, PA
—
647
687
—
—
647
687
1,334
16
1997
04/16
30
Lansing, MI
—
588
873
—
—
588
873
1,461
21
2001
04/16
30
Laurel, MD
—
716
990
—
—
716
990
1,706
23
1998
04/16
30
Lewis Center, OH
—
608
1,049
—
—
608
1,049
1,657
25
2001
04/16
30
Lewisburg, WV
—
354
619
—
—
354
619
973
15
2003
04/16
30
Lexington, KY
—
432
619
—
—
432
619
1,051
15
2001
04/16
30
Linthicum Heights, MD
—
687
755
—
—
687
755
1,442
18
2004
04/16
30
Livonia, MI
—
716
755
—
—
716
755
1,471
21
1982
04/16
25
Logan, WV
—
314
1,285
—
—
314
1,285
1,599
30
1999
04/16
30
Logansport, IN
—
118
1,148
—
—
118
1,148
1,266
27
1994
04/16
30
London, OH
—
235
1,060
—
—
235
1,060
1,295
25
2004
04/16
30
Louisville, KY
—
815
432
—
—
815
432
1,247
10
2003
04/16
30
Madison Heights, MI
—
599
667
—
—
599
667
1,266
16
2000
04/16
30
Mansfield, OH
—
275
1,069
—
—
275
1,069
1,344
25
2005
04/16
30
Marion, IL
—
344
658
—
—
344
658
1,002
16
1997
04/16
30
Marion, IN
—
443
364
—
—
443
364
807
9
1996
04/16
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-9
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Martinsburg, WV
—
815
491
—
—
815
491
1,306
12
1992
04/16
30
Maumee, OH
—
766
295
—
—
766
295
1,061
7
2000
04/16
30
Medina, OH
—
402
922
—
—
402
922
1,324
26
1988
04/16
25
Mentor, OH
—
667
1,039
—
—
667
1,039
1,706
25
1995
04/16
30
Merrillville, IN
—
942
422
—
—
942
422
1,364
10
2004
04/16
30
Moon Township, PA
—
452
521
—
—
452
521
973
15
1984
04/16
25
Morgantown, WV
—
1,000
990
—
—
1,000
990
1,990
23
1992
04/16
30
New Albany, OH
—
539
1,431
—
—
539
1,431
1,970
34
2002
04/16
30
New Castle, PA
—
461
912
—
—
461
912
1,373
22
2005
04/16
30
Ocala, FL
—
853
706
—
—
853
706
1,559
17
2005
04/16
30
Ocala, FL
—
608
1,137
—
—
608
1,137
1,745
27
2000
04/16
30
Oxford, OH
—
294
1,216
—
—
294
1,216
1,510
29
1994
04/16
30
Perrysburg, OH
—
559
990
—
—
559
990
1,549
28
1984
04/16
25
Perrysburg, OH
—
795
363
—
—
795
363
1,158
9
2001
04/16
30
Pickerington, OH
—
519
1,509
—
—
519
1,509
2,028
36
1999
04/16
30
Pittsburgh, PA
—
491
687
—
—
491
687
1,178
19
1985
04/16
25
Port Orange, FL
—
648
491
—
—
648
491
1,139
12
2002
04/16
30
Powell, OH
—
824
706
—
—
824
706
1,530
17
2004
04/16
30
Princeton, WV
—
363
1,255
—
—
363
1,255
1,618
30
1998
04/16
30
Richmond, IN
—
363
1,001
—
—
363
1,001
1,364
20
2003
04/16
35
Rio Grande, OH
—
314
1,333
—
—
314
1,333
1,647
38
1962
04/16
25
Romulus, MI
—
902
628
—
—
902
628
1,530
18
1988
04/16
25
Saginaw, MI
—
648
481
—
—
648
481
1,129
14
1987
04/16
25
Salisburg, MD
—
913
471
—
—
913
471
1,384
11
1997
04/16
30
Somerset, KY
—
245
1,295
—
—
245
1,295
1,540
31
1995
04/16
30
South Bloomfield, OH
—
177
1,236
—
—
177
1,236
1,413
29
2005
04/16
30
South Euclid, OH
—
216
933
—
—
216
933
1,149
19
2012
04/16
35
St. Louis, MO
—
697
589
—
—
697
589
1,286
17
1986
04/16
25
St. Petersburg, FL
—
727
324
—
—
727
324
1,051
9
1986
04/16
25
Stafford, VA
—
764
1,225
—
—
764
1,225
1,989
29
2004
04/16
30
Toledo, OH
—
745
1,225
—
—
745
1,225
1,970
35
1990
04/16
25
Waldorf, MD
—
844
657
—
—
844
657
1,501
16
2004
04/16
30
Washington C H, OH
—
304
923
—
—
304
923
1,227
22
1993
04/16
30
Washington, PA
—
579
501
—
—
579
501
1,080
12
2003
04/16
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-10
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Watertown, NY
—
196
1,461
—
—
196
1,461
1,657
34
1996
04/16
30
Waverly, OH
—
226
1,226
—
—
226
1,226
1,452
29
1995
04/16
30
West Chester, OH
—
765
706
—
—
765
706
1,471
17
1999
04/16
30
Wilmington, OH
—
216
1,392
—
—
216
1,392
1,608
33
1993
04/16
30
Woodhaven, MI
—
511
599
—
—
511
599
1,110
14
2000
04/16
30
Wooster, OH
—
216
1,109
—
—
216
1,109
1,325
26
1995
04/16
30
Zanesville, OH
—
314
1,333
—
—
314
1,333
1,647
31
2000
04/16
30
Zanesville, OH
—
363
746
—
—
363
746
1,109
18
2003
04/16
30
Bob's Discount Furniture:
Merrillville, IN
—
981
—
7,285
—
981
7,285
8,266
114
2016
09/15
(m)
40
Bombones Sports Bar:
Dallas, TX
—
1,138
1,025
370
—
1,138
1,395
2,533
408
1994
12/01
40
Bonefish:
Mobile, AL
—
801
2,137
—
—
801
2,137
2,938
293
2006
03/12
35
Pensacola, FL
—
734
2,003
—
—
734
2,003
2,737
274
2004
03/12
35
Books-A-Million:
Newark, DE
—
2,394
4,789
33
—
2,366
4,822
7,188
2,638
1994
12/94
40
Bangor, ME
—
1,547
2,487
—
—
1,547
2,487
4,034
1,276
1996
06/96
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-11
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Boston Market:
Geneva, IL
—
653
601
—
—
669
518
1,187
202
1996
12/01
40
North Olmsted, OH
—
602
461
—
—
602
389
991
147
1996
12/01
40
Novi, MI
—
836
651
—
—
836
298
1,134
116
1995
12/01
40
BP:
Jeannette, PA
—
79
235
—
—
79
235
314
23
1995
07/14
25
Buck's:
St. Louis, MO
—
776
—
3,822
—
776
3,822
4,598
737
2009
12/07
(o)
40
Glendale Heights, IL
—
1,662
—
3,101
—
1,662
3,101
4,763
74
2016
03/14
(m)
40
Omaha, NE
—
2,662
—
3,397
—
2,662
3,397
6,059
67
2016
05/15
(m)
(k)
Council Bluffs, IA
—
374
2,187
386
—
376
2,573
2,949
122
2015
06/15
(m)
30
Buffalo Wild Wings:
Michigan City, IN
—
163
492
—
—
163
492
655
185
1996
12/01
40
Burger King:
Colonial Heights, VA
—
662
610
—
—
662
610
1,272
229
1997
12/01
40
Clifton Park, NY
—
199
1,639
—
—
199
1,639
1,838
88
2004
02/15
35
Colorado Springs, CO
—
638
1,047
—
—
638
1,047
1,685
79
1978
02/15
25
Durham, NC (n)
—
604
581
—
—
604
581
1,185
36
2005
02/15
30
Durham, NC (n)
—
566
555
—
—
566
555
1,121
35
1998
02/15
30
Farmington, ME
—
461
708
—
—
461
708
1,169
44
1980
02/15
30
Yakima, WA
—
596
1,110
—
—
596
1,110
1,706
69
1979
02/15
30
Fairfield, OH
—
382
1,146
—
—
382
1,146
1,528
59
1984
03/15
35
Burlington Coat Factory:
Lacey, WA
—
2,777
7,082
3,617
—
2,777
10,699
13,476
3,849
1992
02/97
40
Chesterfield, MO
—
2,742
6,469
165
—
2,742
6,634
9,376
242
2015
04/15
40
Buybacks Entertainment:
Lafayette, LA
—
603
1,149
30
—
603
1,179
1,782
322
1999
12/05
40
C&C Gymnastics:
Augusta, GA
—
177
674
—
—
177
674
851
254
1998
12/01
40
Caliber Collision:
Alvin, TX
—
400
712
—
—
400
712
1,112
209
1984
02/11
20
Galveston, TX
—
361
789
—
—
361
789
1,150
232
1965
02/11
20
Houston, TX
—
348
1,731
—
—
348
1,731
2,079
407
1987
02/11
25
Copperas Cove, TX
—
269
1,436
—
—
269
1,436
1,705
203
1972
01/12
35
Killeen, TX
—
408
2,171
—
—
408
2,171
2,579
431
1986
01/12
25
Austin, TX
—
1,071
3,412
—
—
1,071
3,412
4,483
665
1975
02/12
25
Gilbert, AZ
—
474
1,543
—
—
474
1,543
2,017
238
2003
05/12
30
Spring, TX
—
913
2,307
—
—
913
2,307
3,220
349
2006
06/12
30
Tomball, TX
—
414
1,281
—
—
414
1,281
1,695
166
2009
06/12
35
Edmond, OK
—
472
1,437
—
—
472
1,437
1,909
182
1964
03/13
30
Duluth, GA
—
855
2,791
—
—
855
2,791
3,646
43
1996
07/16
30
San Antonio, TX
—
717
2,768
—
—
717
2,768
3,485
51
1984
07/16
25
Camping World:
Vacaville, CA
—
2,467
6,575
—
—
2,467
6,575
9,042
1,213
2008
07/10
35
North Little Rock, AR
—
1,198
3,348
2,237
—
1,280
5,513
6,793
795
2007
09/10
(m)
35
Strafford, MO
—
1,278
3,694
2,099
—
1,846
5,225
7,071
757
2007
09/10
(o)
35
Avondale, AZ
—
1,976
3,040
3,200
—
1,976
6,239
8,215
833
2009
05/11
(o)
35
Mesa, AZ
—
3,972
2,046
981
—
3,975
3,027
7,002
601
1983
05/11
25
Bowling Green, KY
—
584
2,481
—
—
584
2,481
3,065
387
2007
07/11
35
Council Bluffs, IA
—
2,013
2,806
2,187
—
2,955
4,048
7,003
445
2008
07/11
(o)
35
Roanoke, VA
—
2,046
5,050
2,408
—
3,563
5,940
9,503
792
2008
07/11
(k)
35
Golden, CO
—
5,516
—
8,176
—
6,446
7,246
13,692
781
2012
10/11
(m)
40
Belleville, MI
—
1,156
2,071
—
—
1,156
2,071
3,227
418
1986
12/11
25
Kissimmee, FL
—
1,578
2,783
—
—
1,578
2,783
4,361
561
1979
12/11
25
La Mirada, CA
—
3,593
911
—
—
3,577
907
4,484
152
1996
12/11
30
Myrtle Beach, SC
—
540
61
—
—
540
61
601
12
1976
12/11
25
Nashville, TN
—
1,155
1,034
5,665
—
3,626
4,235
7,861
552
1985
12/11
(o)
40
Valencia, CA
—
4,788
4,191
—
—
4,766
4,179
8,945
843
1980
12/11
25
Calera, AL
—
1,204
3,075
—
—
1,204
3,075
4,279
421
2008
03/12
35
Jacksonville, FL
—
2,343
2,679
—
—
1,289
2,679
3,968
513
1973
03/12
25
Louisville, TN
—
990
554
1,194
—
990
1,748
2,738
175
1977
03/12
(o)
40
Winter Garden, FL
—
1,173
3,178
—
—
1,173
3,178
4,351
508
1973
03/12
30
Cocoa, FL
—
1,194
1,876
—
—
1,194
1,876
3,070
279
1981
07/12
30
Dover, FL
—
2,431
9,658
3,047
—
5,478
9,658
15,136
1,005
2013
01/13
35
Grain Valley, MO
—
1,210
2,908
3,441
—
2,533
5,026
7,559
305
2003
09/13
(o)
35
Lubbock, TX
—
775
3,998
—
—
775
3,998
4,773
439
1997
09/13
30
Olive Branch, MS
—
3,163
—
3,836
—
3,163
3,836
6,999
236
2014
11/13
(m)
40
Cedar Falls, IA
—
1,924
3,810
1,158
—
1,924
4,968
6,892
417
2004
03/14
(o)
30
Akron, OH
—
1,221
7,868
—
—
1,221
7,868
9,089
564
1991
03/15
25
Anniston, AL
—
3,206
5,328
1,264
—
3,206
6,594
9,800
353
2007
03/15
(o)
30
Richmond, IN
—
1,096
1,424
3,104
—
2,062
3,562
5,624
122
1998
03/15
(o)
35
Marion, NC
—
1,712
5,317
—
—
1,712
5,317
7,029
328
2003
06/15
25
Syracuse, NY
—
1,070
8,573
—
—
1,070
8,573
9,643
441
2001
06/15
30
North Charleston, SC
—
2,444
681
1,047
—
2,444
1,728
4,172
41
1985
07/15
(k)
25
Jackson, MS
—
1,690
4,241
—
—
1,690
4,241
5,931
146
2015
08/15
40
Captain D's:
Tupelo, MS
—
360
517
—
—
360
517
877
32
1999
02/15
30
Ft. Worth, TX
—
254
563
—
—
254
563
817
50
1982
03/15
20
Kingsland, GA
—
570
—
844
—
570
844
1,414
20
2015
09/15
(m)
40
Dothan, AL
—
159
1,075
—
—
159
1,075
1,234
37
1985
12/15
30
Boiling Springs, SC
—
214
—
1,181
—
214
1,181
1,395
24
2003
02/16
(o)
40
Hermitage, TN
—
546
348
—
—
546
348
894
10
1976
04/16
25
Easley, SC
—
690
—
755
—
690
755
1,445
2
2016
06/16
(m)
(k)
Augusta, GA
—
227
1,136
—
—
227
1,136
1,363
9
1993
10/16
25
Augusta, GA
—
573
869
—
—
573
869
1,442
7
1986
10/16
25
Augusta, GA
—
288
268
—
—
288
268
556
2
1985
10/16
25
Augusta, GA
—
296
1,274
—
—
296
1,274
1,570
8
2014
10/16
35
Eastman, GA
—
228
693
—
—
228
693
921
6
1987
10/16
25
Fort Valley, GA
—
208
841
—
—
208
841
1,049
4
1987
10/16
40
Macon, GA
—
237
1,303
—
—
237
1,303
1,540
11
1982
10/16
25
Perry, GA
—
247
1,353
—
—
247
1,353
1,600
11
1972
10/16
25
Baton Rouge, LA
—
890
—
—
—
890
(e)
890
(e)
(e)
12/16
(m)
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-12
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Carl's Jr.:
Spokane, WA (n)
—
471
530
—
—
471
530
1,001
199
1996
12/01
40
Chandler, AZ
—
729
644
—
—
729
644
1,373
372
1984
06/05
20
Tucson, AZ
—
681
536
103
—
681
639
1,320
639
1988
06/05
10
Carmike Cinemas:
Fayetteville, NC
—
2,409
—
13,750
—
2,409
13,750
16,159
730
2014
11/13
40
Montgomery, AL
—
1,686
11,156
—
—
1,686
11,156
12,842
639
2014
09/14
40
Albuquerque, NM
—
1,474
—
10,301
—
1,474
10,301
11,775
311
2015
11/14
(m)
40
CarQuest:
Abbeville, LA
—
23
148
—
—
23
148
171
45
1970
12/10
20
Abbotsford, WI
—
56
163
—
—
56
163
219
39
1984
12/10
25
Aberdeen, SD (n)
—
71
329
—
—
71
329
400
99
1961
12/10
20
Addison, IL
—
76
314
—
—
76
314
390
76
1971
12/10
25
Alsip, IL
—
57
323
—
—
57
323
380
98
1972
12/10
20
Anaconda, MT
—
35
307
—
—
35
307
342
93
1965
12/10
20
Ann Arbor, MI
—
25
241
—
—
25
241
266
73
1970
12/10
20
Antigo, WI
—
96
294
—
—
96
294
390
59
1998
12/10
30
Appleton, WI (n)
—
85
438
—
—
85
438
523
88
1995
12/10
30
Arden, NC
—
42
281
—
—
42
281
323
68
1989
12/10
25
Baker, MT
—
12
140
—
—
12
140
152
42
1965
12/10
20
Bakersfield, CA
—
77
484
—
—
77
484
561
146
1945
12/10
20
Bangor, ME
—
51
339
—
—
51
339
390
82
1985
12/10
25
Bangor, ME (n)
—
53
356
—
—
53
356
409
143
1945
12/10
15
Bartlett, TN
—
40
293
—
—
40
293
333
71
1989
12/10
25
Bay City, MI
—
14
100
—
—
14
100
114
40
1942
12/10
15
Bay City, MI
—
106
521
—
—
106
521
627
210
1920
12/10
15
Bay City, MI
—
41
282
—
—
41
282
323
68
1989
12/10
25
Bend, OR
—
125
245
—
—
125
245
370
99
1935
12/10
15
Biddeford, ME
—
60
320
—
—
60
320
380
97
1968
12/10
20
Billings, MT
—
31
188
—
—
31
188
219
45
1970
12/10
25
Bismarck, ND
—
25
136
—
—
25
136
161
33
1985
12/10
25
Bozeman, MT
—
28
257
—
—
28
257
285
78
1964
12/10
20
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-13
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Brunswick, ME
—
41
254
—
—
41
254
295
61
1985
12/10
25
Bucksport, ME
—
19
114
—
—
19
114
133
35
1976
12/10
20
Burlington, NC
—
47
229
—
—
47
229
276
46
1994
12/10
30
Carol Stream, IL
—
103
515
—
—
103
515
618
155
1960
12/10
20
Chicago, IL
—
83
383
—
—
83
383
466
92
1987
12/10
25
Chippewa Falls, WI
—
33
328
—
—
33
328
361
66
1996
12/10
30
Cody, WY (n)
—
146
253
—
—
96
253
349
51
1999
12/10
30
Colstrip, MT
—
39
275
—
—
39
275
314
66
1981
12/10
25
Connersville, IN
—
28
171
—
—
28
171
199
69
1920
12/10
15
Corapolis, PA (n)
—
74
316
—
—
74
316
390
95
1980
12/10
20
Cut Bank, MT
—
9
115
—
—
9
115
124
35
1937
12/10
20
Devils Lake, ND
—
38
276
—
—
38
276
314
56
1999
12/10
30
Dillon, MT
—
24
204
—
—
24
204
228
62
1973
12/10
20
Dodge City, KS (n)
—
43
166
—
—
43
166
209
67
1948
12/10
15
Eau Claire, WI
—
33
204
—
—
33
204
237
62
1956
12/10
20
Elgin, IL
—
88
311
—
—
88
311
399
94
1965
12/10
20
Enterprise, AL
—
25
184
—
—
25
184
209
44
1988
12/10
25
Escanaba, MI
—
40
283
—
—
40
283
323
68
1982
12/10
25
Evansville, IN
—
60
301
—
—
60
301
361
73
1980
12/10
25
Fairbanks, AK
—
292
545
—
—
292
545
837
94
2003
12/10
35
Gainesville, FL (n)
—
47
362
—
—
47
362
409
146
1957
12/10
15
Glasgow, MT
—
48
275
—
—
48
275
323
83
1972
12/10
20
Great Falls, MT
—
17
173
—
—
17
173
190
52
1967
12/10
20
Greenville, OH
—
63
193
—
—
63
193
256
78
1910
12/10
15
Hamilton, MT
—
24
242
—
—
24
242
266
58
1991
12/10
25
Harlem, MT
—
17
116
—
—
17
116
133
28
1983
12/10
25
Hayward, WI
—
57
333
—
—
57
333
390
80
1980
12/10
25
Helena, MT
—
31
282
—
—
31
282
313
68
1987
12/10
25
Houlton, ME
—
38
219
—
—
38
219
257
132
1915
12/10
10
Irving, TX
—
182
208
—
—
182
208
390
63
1984
12/10
20
Kalispell, MT (n)
—
59
645
—
—
59
645
704
130
1998
12/10
30
Kennedale, TX
—
88
283
—
—
88
283
371
85
1959
12/10
20
Lafayette, LA
—
51
357
—
—
51
357
408
72
1996
12/10
30
Laurel, MS
—
74
202
—
—
74
202
276
81
1959
12/10
15
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-14
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Lewistown, MT
—
19
180
—
—
19
180
199
44
1964
12/10
25
Livingston, MT
—
34
261
—
—
34
261
295
79
1976
12/10
20
Lufkin, TX
—
94
229
—
—
94
229
323
69
1986
12/10
20
Madison, TN
—
78
179
—
—
78
179
257
43
1988
12/10
25
Madison, WI
—
57
409
—
—
57
409
466
99
1973
12/10
25
Malta, MT
—
19
181
—
—
19
181
200
44
1976
12/10
25
Marshfield, WI
—
60
282
—
—
60
282
342
85
1940
12/10
20
Medford, WI
—
37
229
—
—
37
229
266
55
1988
12/10
25
Memphis, TN
—
38
199
—
—
38
199
237
48
1987
12/10
25
Metamora, IL
—
69
292
—
—
69
292
361
59
1996
12/10
30
Midland, MI
—
44
336
—
—
44
336
380
68
1986
12/10
30
Midland, TX
—
36
212
—
—
36
212
248
85
1960
12/10
15
Montello, WI
—
26
173
—
—
26
173
199
35
1997
12/10
30
Muskegon, MI
—
38
257
—
—
38
257
295
52
1990
12/10
30
Neillsville, WI
—
26
145
—
—
26
145
171
35
1979
12/10
25
Nicholasville, KY
—
54
241
—
—
54
241
295
58
1988
12/10
25
Ocala, FL
—
78
416
—
—
78
416
494
167
1971
12/10
15
Olathe, KS
—
78
235
—
—
78
235
313
95
1950
12/10
15
Oshkosh, WI
—
99
224
—
—
99
224
323
45
1999
12/10
30
Overland, MO
—
68
370
—
—
68
370
438
112
1961
12/10
20
Owosso, MI
—
50
264
—
—
50
264
314
64
1986
12/10
25
Pearl, MS
—
43
195
—
—
43
195
238
39
1989
12/10
30
Phillips, WI
—
23
177
—
—
23
177
200
36
1992
12/10
30
Powell, WY
—
37
182
—
—
37
182
219
44
1978
12/10
25
Rhinelander, WI
—
28
115
—
—
28
115
143
35
1958
12/10
20
River Falls, WI
—
42
234
—
—
42
234
276
71
1976
12/10
20
Riverton, WY
—
99
300
—
—
99
300
399
73
1978
12/10
25
Rockford, IL
—
61
376
—
—
61
376
437
91
1962
12/10
25
Roundup, MT
—
23
205
—
—
23
205
228
62
1972
12/10
20
Schofield, WI
—
41
425
—
—
41
425
466
128
1968
12/10
20
Sheboygan, WI
—
77
370
—
—
77
370
447
64
2007
12/10
35
Shelby, MT
—
20
208
—
—
20
208
228
63
1976
12/10
20
Sidney, MT (n)
—
42
395
—
—
42
395
437
119
1962
12/10
20
Spartanburg, SC
—
53
252
—
—
53
252
305
61
1972
12/10
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-15
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Spokane, WA
—
66
201
—
—
66
201
267
61
1965
12/10
20
Spokane, WA
—
93
373
—
—
93
373
466
113
1972
12/10
20
St. Peter, MN
—
17
259
—
—
17
259
276
52
1999
12/10
30
Stayton, OR
—
88
312
—
—
88
312
400
63
1994
12/10
30
Stevens Point, WI (n)
—
61
405
—
—
61
405
466
98
1975
12/10
25
Sulphur, LA
—
31
216
—
—
31
216
247
65
1984
12/10
20
Thornton, CO
—
414
536
—
—
414
536
950
108
1996
12/10
30
Troy, AL
—
15
52
—
—
15
52
67
21
1966
12/10
15
Wasilla, AK
—
227
504
—
—
227
504
731
87
2002
12/10
35
Wausau, WI
—
52
300
—
—
52
300
352
72
1989
12/10
25
Wautoma, WI
—
18
106
—
—
18
106
124
32
1959
12/10
20
Waynesboro, MS
—
15
71
—
—
15
71
86
29
1962
12/10
15
West Columbia, SC
—
41
159
—
—
41
159
200
48
1962
12/10
20
West Memphis, AR
—
58
294
—
—
58
294
352
71
1987
12/10
25
Whitefish, MT
—
30
227
—
—
30
227
257
46
1993
12/10
30
Williston, ND
—
35
297
—
—
35
297
332
60
1999
12/10
30
Windom, MN
—
5
137
—
—
5
137
142
41
1950
12/10
20
Wisconsin Rapids, WI
—
41
215
—
—
41
215
256
65
1975
12/10
20
Yakima, WA
—
50
321
—
—
50
321
371
97
1965
12/10
20
Aurora, IL
—
641
226
—
—
641
226
867
67
1971
02/11
20
Benton Harbor, MI
—
207
160
—
—
207
160
367
47
1978
02/11
20
Caro, MI
—
85
132
—
—
85
132
217
78
1941
02/11
10
Eagle River, WI
—
99
52
—
—
99
52
151
15
1978
02/11
20
Essexville, MI
—
113
113
—
—
113
113
226
33
1974
02/11
20
Lexington, KY
—
85
226
—
—
85
226
311
44
1991
02/11
30
Mt. Pleasant, MI
—
85
207
—
—
85
207
292
49
1984
02/11
25
Saginaw, MI
—
179
75
—
—
179
75
254
44
1955
02/11
10
Warrenton, VA
—
123
66
—
—
123
66
189
39
1939
02/11
10
Billings, MT
—
66
291
—
—
66
291
357
63
1994
07/11
25
Mobile, AL
—
75
197
—
—
75
197
272
54
1975
07/11
20
New Castle, IN
—
113
19
—
—
113
19
132
4
1991
07/11
25
Spokane, WA
—
75
56
—
—
75
56
131
15
1955
07/11
20
Chicago, IL
—
90
239
—
—
90
239
329
82
1949
11/11
15
Missoula, MT
—
99
367
—
—
99
367
466
94
1965
11/11
20
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-16
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Sheridan, WY
—
198
385
—
—
198
385
583
99
1980
11/11
20
Sauk Centre, MN
—
64
85
—
—
64
85
149
17
1958
11/11
25
Watford City, ND
—
31
124
—
—
31
124
155
25
1974
11/11
25
Fairmont, MN
—
98
166
—
—
98
166
264
41
1978
01/12
20
Sycamore, IL
—
49
476
—
—
49
476
525
118
1924
01/12
20
Worland, WY
—
48
193
—
—
48
193
241
45
1949
04/12
20
Anchorage, AK
—
315
92
—
—
315
92
407
21
1971
06/12
20
Havre, MT
—
29
305
—
—
29
305
334
69
1964
06/12
20
Orchard Park, NY
—
353
—
725
—
267
725
992
58
2013
05/13
(m)
40
Morrisville, NC
—
127
332
—
—
127
332
459
48
1992
05/13
25
Salt Lake City, UT
—
571
697
—
—
571
697
1,268
126
1951
05/13
20
San Antonio, TX
—
87
719
—
—
87
719
806
104
1973
05/13
25
San Antonio, TX
—
137
361
—
—
137
361
498
65
1980
05/13
20
Jackson, MS
—
253
—
604
—
253
604
857
46
2013
06/13
(m)
40
Crestview, FL
—
158
463
—
—
158
463
621
51
2003
09/13
30
Depew, NY
—
309
—
821
—
309
821
1,130
54
2014
10/13
(m)
40
Sherman, TX
—
183
—
657
—
183
657
840
49
2005
01/14
(o)
35
Carrabba's:
Canton, MI
—
685
1,687
—
—
685
1,687
2,372
269
2002
03/12
30
Cape Coral, FL
—
645
2,965
—
—
645
2,965
3,610
406
2005
03/12
35
Dallas, TX
—
672
1,078
—
—
672
1,078
1,750
172
2000
03/12
30
Gainesville, FL
—
922
1,944
—
—
922
1,944
2,866
310
2001
03/12
30
Jacksonville, FL
—
1,140
1,428
—
—
1,140
1,428
2,568
228
2001
03/12
30
Mason, OH
—
653
2,267
—
—
653
2,267
2,920
362
2000
03/12
30
Maumee, OH
—
525
2,684
—
—
525
2,684
3,209
429
2002
03/12
30
Mobile, AL
—
633
1,909
—
—
633
1,909
2,542
305
2001
03/12
30
Pensacola, FL
—
734
1,854
—
—
734
1,854
2,588
254
2003
03/12
35
Waldorf, MD
—
1,473
2,199
—
—
1,473
2,199
3,672
301
2007
03/12
35
Carvers:
Centerville, OH
—
851
1,059
—
—
851
1,059
1,910
398
1986
12/01
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-17
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Chair King:
Grapevine, TX
—
1,018
2,067
273
—
1,018
2,340
3,358
998
1998
06/98
40
Champps:
Irving, TX
—
1,760
1,724
—
—
1,760
1,724
3,484
648
2000
12/01
40
Charleston Auto Auction:
Moncks Corner, SC
—
1,628
5,911
471
—
1,628
6,383
8,011
256
2000
09/15
(o)
30
Cheddar's Cafe:
Baytown, TX
—
858
2,251
—
—
858
2,251
3,109
340
2010
12/10
40
West Monroe, LA
—
907
2,301
—
—
907
2,301
3,208
343
2010
01/11
40
Selma, TX
—
1,446
—
2,439
—
1,446
2,439
3,885
323
2011
03/11
(m)
40
Jonesboro, AR
—
1,206
—
2,459
—
1,206
2,459
3,665
315
2011
05/11
(m)
40
Hattiesburg, MS
—
1,203
—
—
—
1,196
(i)
1,196
(i)
(i)
11/11
(i)
Pleasant Prairie, WI
—
1,310
—
2,779
—
1,310
2,779
4,089
223
2013
04/13
(m)
40
Liberty, MO
—
1,313
—
3,140
—
1,313
3,140
4,453
232
2014
07/13
(m)
40
Chick-Fil-A:
Ankeny, IA
—
662
—
—
—
662
(i)
662
(i)
(i)
06/05
(i)
Chili's:
Camden, SC
—
627
1,888
—
—
627
1,888
2,515
533
2005
09/05
40
Milledgeville, GA
—
516
1,997
—
—
516
1,997
2,513
564
2005
09/05
40
Sumter, SC
—
800
1,717
—
—
800
1,717
2,517
474
2004
12/05
40
Hinesville, GA
—
921
1,898
—
—
921
1,898
2,819
469
2006
02/07
40
Albany, GA
—
615
—
1,984
—
615
1,984
2,599
457
2007
06/07
(m)
40
Statesboro, GA
—
703
—
1,888
—
703
1,888
2,591
431
2007
06/07
(m)
40
Florence, SC
—
889
1,715
—
—
889
1,715
2,604
409
2007
06/07
40
Valdosta, GA
—
716
—
1,871
—
716
1,871
2,587
423
2007
07/07
(m)
40
Tifton, GA
—
454
1,550
—
—
454
1,550
2,004
318
2008
06/08
40
Evans, GA
—
700
—
1,511
—
685
1,511
2,196
298
2009
10/08
(m)
40
Jefferson City, MO
—
305
898
—
—
305
898
1,203
181
2003
12/09
35
Merriam, KS
—
853
981
—
—
853
981
1,834
230
1998
12/09
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-18
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Wichita, KS
—
420
623
—
—
420
623
1,043
146
1995
12/09
30
Hutchinson, KS
—
456
1,794
—
—
456
1,794
2,250
232
2004
02/13
30
Lexington, SC
—
630
1,620
—
—
630
1,620
2,250
179
2008
02/13
35
China 1:
Cohoes, NY
—
16
87
6
—
16
93
109
31
1994
09/04
40
China Garden:
Tucson, AZ
—
827
305
142
—
845
429
1,274
133
1974
12/01
40
Chipotle:
Florissant, MO
—
50
59
170
—
50
228
278
42
2013
04/03
(g)
40
Chuck E. Cheese's:
Mobile, AL
—
340
951
—
—
340
951
1,291
244
1981
11/11
20
Antioch, TN
—
459
1,738
—
—
459
1,738
2,197
285
1982
07/14
15
Huntsville, AL
—
382
1,182
—
—
382
1,182
1,564
145
1960
07/14
20
Saginaw, MI
—
489
1,203
—
—
489
1,203
1,692
148
1981
07/14
20
Albuquerque, NM
—
794
2,126
—
—
794
2,126
2,920
144
2003
08/14
35
Alexandria, LA
—
872
3,291
—
—
872
3,291
4,163
313
1983
08/14
25
Alpharetta, GA
—
2,027
1,743
—
—
2,027
1,743
3,770
138
2001
08/14
30
Atlanta, GA
—
1,313
1,656
—
—
1,313
1,656
2,969
157
1982
08/14
25
Austin, TX
—
852
4,024
—
—
852
4,024
4,876
319
2001
08/14
30
Batavia, IL
—
1,214
2,664
—
—
1,214
2,664
3,878
211
1999
08/14
30
Birmingham, AL
—
627
3,662
—
—
627
3,662
4,289
348
1982
08/14
25
Columbia, SC
—
509
2,655
—
—
509
2,655
3,164
210
1983
08/14
30
Conroe, TX
—
793
3,388
—
—
793
3,388
4,181
268
2001
08/14
30
Cordova, TN
—
1,195
3,055
—
—
1,195
3,055
4,250
242
2002
08/14
30
Denton, TX
—
833
1,245
—
—
833
1,245
2,078
84
2003
08/14
35
El Centro, CA
—
470
2,811
—
—
470
2,811
3,281
191
2005
08/14
35
Englewood, CO
—
911
3,056
—
—
911
3,056
3,967
242
1970
08/14
30
Foothill Ranch, CA
—
1,088
1,391
—
—
1,088
1,391
2,479
110
2003
08/14
30
Ft. Wayne, IN
—
686
3,232
—
—
686
3,232
3,918
256
1985
08/14
30
Garland, TX
—
1,224
2,302
—
—
1,224
2,302
3,526
156
2006
08/14
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-19
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Grand Prairie, TX
—
1,380
4,983
—
—
1,380
4,983
6,363
394
2001
08/14
30
Grapevine, TX
—
1,303
2,135
—
—
1,303
2,135
3,438
169
2002
08/14
30
Greenville, SC
—
764
3,554
—
—
764
3,554
4,318
338
1983
08/14
25
Hickory, NC
—
647
1,686
—
—
647
1,686
2,333
114
2002
08/14
35
Horn Lake, MS
—
960
3,388
—
—
960
3,388
4,348
230
2002
08/14
35
Jacksonville, FL
—
1,038
4,220
—
—
1,038
4,220
5,258
401
1981
08/14
25
Katy, TX
—
960
4,171
—
—
960
4,171
5,131
330
2002
08/14
30
Kennesaw, GA
—
1,332
3,818
—
—
1,332
3,818
5,150
302
1999
08/14
30
Killeen, TX
—
832
4,876
—
—
832
4,876
5,708
331
2004
08/14
35
Lake Charles, LA
—
853
1,539
—
—
853
1,539
2,392
122
2001
08/14
30
Littleton, CO
—
1,234
4,288
—
—
1,234
4,288
5,522
339
1994
08/14
30
Longview, TX
—
314
1,931
—
—
314
1,931
2,245
131
2004
08/14
35
Madison, WI
—
999
1,989
—
—
999
1,989
2,988
189
1982
08/14
25
Miamisburg, OH
—
607
4,416
—
—
607
4,416
5,023
419
1986
08/14
25
Midland, TX
—
588
2,537
—
—
588
2,537
3,125
201
2000
08/14
30
N. Richland Hills, TX
—
588
4,064
—
—
588
4,064
4,652
386
1982
08/14
25
Norcross, GA
—
1,077
2,703
—
—
1,077
2,703
3,780
257
1982
08/14
25
North Charleston, SC
—
1,449
3,319
—
—
1,449
3,319
4,768
263
2003
08/14
30
Oklahoma City, OK
—
499
3,203
—
—
499
3,203
3,702
304
1982
08/14
25
Olathe, KS
—
843
736
—
—
843
736
1,579
58
2002
08/14
30
Racine, WI
—
765
834
—
—
765
834
1,599
66
2000
08/14
30
Roanoke, TX
—
617
4,787
—
—
617
4,787
5,404
455
1983
08/14
25
San Antonio, TX
—
793
4,670
—
—
793
4,670
5,463
444
1990
08/14
25
San Antonio, TX
—
1,371
2,703
—
—
1,371
2,703
4,074
214
2001
08/14
30
Savannah, GA
—
1,469
2,634
—
—
1,469
2,634
4,103
250
1982
08/14
25
Sharonville, OH
—
696
1,597
—
—
696
1,597
2,293
152
1982
08/14
25
Sterling Heights, MI
—
725
2,322
—
—
725
2,322
3,047
184
1994
08/14
30
Sugarland, TX
—
1,107
3,134
—
—
1,107
3,134
4,241
248
2002
08/14
30
Topeka, KS
—
373
619
—
—
373
619
992
49
1990
08/14
30
Virginia Beach, VA
—
1,018
3,848
—
—
1,018
3,848
4,866
366
1984
08/14
25
Wichita Falls, TX
—
323
3,105
—
—
323
3,105
3,428
295
1982
08/14
25
Wichita, KS
—
862
2,850
—
—
862
2,850
3,712
226
1991
08/14
30
Yuma, AZ
—
471
668
—
—
471
668
1,139
45
2004
08/14
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-20
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Chuy's:
Cincinnati, OH
—
1,165
1,322
—
—
1,165
1,322
2,487
149
1996
05/13
30
Cinemark:
Draper, UT
—
1,523
—
4,487
—
1,523
4,487
6,010
631
2011
08/10
(m)
40
Fort Worth, TX
—
2,140
—
7,660
—
2,140
7,660
9,800
870
2012
08/11
(o)
40
Cincinnati, OH
—
1,334
—
10,206
—
1,334
10,206
11,540
861
2013
09/12
(m)
40
McCandless, PA
—
3,094
—
6,389
—
3,094
6,389
9,483
366
2014
09/13
(m)
40
Marina, CA
—
15
—
5,614
—
15
5,614
5,629
170
2015
08/14
(m)
40
Altoona, IA
—
1,161
—
9,923
—
1,161
9,923
11,084
217
2016
01/15
(m)
40
City Barbeque:
Charlotte, NC
—
576
—
—
—
576
(e)
576
(e)
(e)
07/16
(m)
Claim Jumper:
Roseville, CA
—
1,557
2,014
—
—
1,557
2,014
3,571
757
2000
12/01
40
Tempe, AZ
—
2,531
2,921
—
—
2,531
2,921
5,452
1,098
2000
12/01
40
Clairton Mini Mart:
Clairton, PA
—
215
701
—
—
215
701
916
307
1986
01/06
25
Coastal Bend Skates:
Aransas Pass, TX
—
90
1,241
245
—
89
1,485
1,574
579
1983
03/99
40
Continental Rental:
Lapeer, MI
—
88
633
—
—
88
603
691
145
2007
10/05
40
Cool Crest:
Independence, MO
—
1,838
1,534
75
—
1,838
1,609
3,447
378
1988
05/07
40
CORA Rehabilitation Clinics:
Orlando, FL
—
80
221
—
—
80
221
301
71
2001
02/04
40
Crest Furniture:
Woodbridge, NJ (n)
—
3,750
5,983
—
—
3,750
5,983
9,733
2,088
1994
01/03
40
CrossAmerica:
Antioch, IL
—
261
2,244
—
—
261
2,244
2,505
4
1988
12/16
25
Fox Lake, IL
—
252
1,184
—
—
252
1,184
1,436
2
1997
12/16
30
Grayslake, IL
—
194
924
—
—
194
924
1,118
2
1988
12/16
25
Joliet, IL
—
87
1,418
—
—
87
1,418
1,505
2
2005
12/16
30
Lincolnshire, IL
—
350
1,146
—
—
350
1,146
1,496
2
1984
12/16
20
Loves Park, IL
—
107
829
—
—
107
829
936
1
2000
12/16
30
Markham, IL
—
145
1,483
—
—
145
1,483
1,628
2
2007
12/16
30
Matteson, IL
—
475
1,202
—
—
475
1,202
1,677
2
2001
12/16
30
Orland Park, IL
—
204
1,290
—
—
204
1,290
1,494
2
1992
12/16
25
Richton Park, IL
—
126
1,021
—
—
126
1,021
1,147
1
2005
12/16
40
Rockford, IL
—
263
742
—
—
263
742
1,005
1
1997
12/16
30
Rockford, IL
—
136
1,167
—
—
136
1,167
1,303
2
1968
12/16
20
Rockford, IL
—
214
1,002
—
—
214
1,002
1,216
2
1987
12/16
20
Rockford, IL
—
97
1,205
—
—
97
1,205
1,302
2
2002
12/16
30
Spring Grove, IL
—
233
1,068
—
—
233
1,068
1,301
2
1987
12/16
20
Wadsworth, IL
—
398
835
—
—
398
835
1,233
1
1997
12/16
30
Wauconda, IL
—
338
2,629
—
—
338
2,629
2,967
4
1991
12/16
25
CVS:
Lafayette, LA
—
968
—
—
—
968
(c)
968
(c)
1995
01/96
(c)
Fort Lauderdale, FL
—
3,165
3,319
190
—
3,165
3,509
6,674
1,493
1995
02/96
33
Midwest City, OK
—
673
1,103
—
—
673
1,103
1,776
574
1996
03/96
40
Pantego, TX
—
1,016
1,449
—
—
1,016
1,449
2,465
708
1997
06/97
40
Arlington, TX
—
2,079
—
1,397
—
2,079
1,397
3,476
642
1998
11/97
(g)
40
Leavenworth, KS
—
726
—
1,331
—
726
1,331
2,057
617
1998
11/97
(g)
40
Lewisville, TX
—
789
—
1,335
—
789
1,335
2,124
611
1998
04/98
(g)
40
Forest Hill, TX
—
692
—
1,175
—
692
1,175
1,867
540
1998
04/98
(g)
40
Garland, TX
—
1,477
—
1,400
—
1,477
1,400
2,877
635
1998
06/98
(g)
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
1,581
—
1,471
—
1,581
1,471
3,052
660
1999
08/98
(g)
40
Dallas, TX
—
2,618
—
2,571
—
2,618
2,571
5,189
849
2003
06/99
(g)
40
Gladstone, MO
—
1,851
—
1,740
—
1,851
1,740
3,591
712
2000
12/99
(g)
40
Dairy Queen:
Lubbock, TX
—
313
450
—
—
313
450
763
56
1981
02/15
15
Dave & Buster's:
Hilliard, OH
—
934
4,689
—
—
934
4,689
5,623
1,187
1998
11/06
40
Tulsa, OK
—
1,862
—
2,105
—
1,862
2,105
3,967
419
2009
04/08
(m)
40
Wauwatosa, WI
—
5,694
—
5,638
—
5,694
5,638
11,332
957
2010
12/08
(m)
40
Orlando, FL
—
8,114
—
4,224
—
8,114
4,224
12,338
576
2011
06/10
(m)
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
3,156
—
4,870
—
3,156
4,870
8,026
604
2012
02/11
(m)
40
Dallas, TX
—
5,052
—
8,808
—
5,052
8,808
13,860
890
2012
03/12
(m)
40
Livonia, MI
—
2,116
—
7,758
—
2,116
7,758
9,874
590
2013
04/13
(m)
40
Euless, TX
—
2,592
—
7,563
—
2,592
7,563
10,155
307
2015
08/14
(m)
40
DaVita Dialysis:
Columbus, OH
—
527
1,426
—
—
527
1,426
1,953
117
2000
07/14
30
Del Frisco's:
Fort Worth, TX
—
351
5,874
—
—
351
5,874
6,225
1,750
1890
01/11
20
Greenwood Village, CO
—
1,863
5,649
—
—
1,863
5,649
7,512
1,683
1979
01/11
20
Denny's:
Clifton, CO
—
245
732
375
—
245
1,107
1,352
340
1998
12/01
40
Columbus, TX
—
428
817
—
—
428
817
1,245
307
1997
12/01
40
Alexandria, VA
—
604
196
—
—
604
196
800
101
1981
09/06
20
Amarillo, TX
—
590
632
—
—
590
632
1,222
325
1982
09/06
20
Arlington Heights, IL
—
470
228
—
—
470
228
698
117
1977
09/06
20
Austintown, OH
—
466
397
—
—
466
397
863
204
1980
09/06
20
Boardman Township, OH
—
497
258
—
—
497
258
755
133
1977
09/06
20
Campbell, CA
—
460
238
—
—
460
238
698
123
1976
09/06
20
Carson, CA
—
1,246
157
—
—
1,246
157
1,403
81
1975
09/06
20
Chehalis, WA
—
415
287
—
—
415
287
702
148
1977
09/06
20
Chubbuck, ID
—
350
394
—
—
344
394
738
203
1983
09/06
20
Clackamas, OR
—
468
407
—
—
468
407
875
210
1993
09/06
20
Collinsville, IL
—
676
283
—
—
676
283
959
146
1979
09/06
20
Colorado Springs, CO
—
321
377
—
—
321
377
698
194
1984
09/06
20
Colorado Springs, CO
—
585
390
—
—
585
390
975
201
1978
09/06
20
Corpus Christi, TX (n)
—
345
776
300
—
345
1,076
1,421
529
1980
09/06
20
Dallas, TX
—
497
150
—
—
497
150
647
77
1979
09/06
20
Enfield, CT
—
684
229
—
—
684
229
913
118
1976
09/06
20
Fairfax, VA
—
768
683
—
—
768
683
1,451
351
1979
09/06
20
Federal Way, WA
—
543
193
—
—
543
193
736
99
1977
09/06
20
Florissant, MO
—
443
238
—
—
443
238
681
122
1977
09/06
20
Fort Worth, TX
—
392
314
—
—
392
314
706
162
1974
09/06
20
Hermitage, PA
—
321
420
—
—
321
420
741
216
1980
09/06
20
Houston, TX
—
504
348
—
—
504
348
852
179
1976
09/06
20
Indianapolis, IN
—
358
767
—
—
358
767
1,125
394
1978
09/06
20
Indianapolis, IN
—
310
590
—
—
310
590
900
303
1981
09/06
20
Indianapolis, IN
—
326
511
—
—
326
511
837
263
1978
09/06
20
Indianapolis, IN
—
231
511
—
—
231
511
742
263
1974
09/06
20
Kernersville, NC
—
407
557
—
—
407
557
964
287
2000
09/06
20
Lafayette, IN
—
424
773
—
—
416
773
1,189
398
1978
09/06
20
Laurel, MD
—
528
379
—
—
528
379
907
195
1976
09/06
20
Little Rock, AR
—
703
180
—
—
703
180
883
92
1979
09/06
20
Maplewood, MN
—
630
271
—
—
630
271
901
140
1983
09/06
20
Merriville, IN
—
368
813
—
—
368
813
1,181
418
1976
09/06
20
N. Miami, FL
—
855
151
—
—
855
151
1,006
78
1977
09/06
20
Nampa, ID
—
357
729
—
—
357
729
1,086
375
1979
09/06
20
North Richland Hills, TX
—
500
130
—
—
500
130
630
67
1970
09/06
20
Omaha, NE
—
496
314
—
—
496
314
810
162
1994
09/06
20
Pompano Beach, FL
—
436
394
—
—
436
394
830
203
1976
09/06
20
Provo, UT
—
519
216
—
—
513
216
729
111
1978
09/06
20
Pueblo, CO
—
475
302
—
—
475
302
777
155
1980
09/06
20
Raleigh, NC
—
1,094
482
—
—
1,094
482
1,576
248
1984
09/06
20
St. Louis, MO
—
520
266
—
—
520
266
786
137
1973
09/06
20
Sugarland, TX
—
315
334
—
—
315
334
649
172
1997
09/06
20
Tacoma, WA
—
580
201
—
—
575
201
776
103
1984
09/06
20
Tucson, AZ
—
922
290
—
—
922
290
1,212
149
1979
09/06
20
Wethersfield, CT
—
884
176
—
—
884
176
1,060
91
1978
09/06
20
Worcester, MA
—
383
493
—
—
383
493
876
253
1978
09/06
20
Boise, ID
—
514
477
—
—
514
477
991
239
1983
12/06
20
St. Louis, MO
—
635
303
—
—
635
303
938
151
1980
01/07
20
Virginia Gardens, FL
—
793
133
—
—
793
133
926
66
1977
01/07
20
Akron, OH
—
308
1,062
—
—
308
1,062
1,370
125
1992
06/13
30
Moab, UT
—
395
1,432
—
—
395
1,432
1,827
90
2000
02/15
30
Dickey's Barbeque Pit:
Medina, OH
—
405
464
104
—
370
568
938
191
1996
12/01
40
Dick's Sporting Goods:
Taylor, MI
—
1,920
3,527
—
—
1,920
3,527
5,447
1,790
1996
08/96
40
White Marsh, MD
—
2,681
3,917
—
—
2,681
3,917
6,598
1,987
1996
08/96
40
Dollar General:
San Antonio, TX
—
441
784
—
—
441
196
637
20
1993
12/93
30
Memphis, TN
—
266
1,136
46
—
266
1,182
1,448
509
1998
12/97
40
High Springs, FL
—
409
—
1,072
—
432
1,072
1,504
164
2010
07/10
(m)
40
Inverness, FL
—
459
—
1,046
—
471
1,046
1,517
156
2011
08/10
(m)
40
Cocoa, FL
—
385
—
935
—
406
935
1,341
143
2010
08/10
(m)
40
Palm Bay, FL
—
355
—
1,011
—
365
1,011
1,376
153
2010
08/10
(m)
40
Deland, FL
—
585
—
958
—
585
958
1,543
141
2010
11/10
(m)
40
Seffner, FL
—
673
—
1,223
—
655
1,223
1,878
180
2011
12/10
(m)
40
Hernando, FL
—
372
—
970
—
372
970
1,342
138
2011
01/11
(m)
40
Titusville, FL
—
512
—
1,002
—
512
1,002
1,514
135
2011
04/11
(m)
40
Disputanta, VA
—
170
—
720
—
170
720
890
95
2011
09/11
(o)
40
Lumberton, NC
—
115
—
902
—
115
902
1,017
112
2012
10/11
(m)
40
Newport News, VA
—
363
—
967
—
363
967
1,330
124
2011
10/11
(m)
40
Cumberland, VA
—
317
—
1,147
—
317
1,147
1,464
137
2012
12/11
(m)
40
Aberdeen, NC
—
156
—
821
—
156
821
977
97
2012
01/12
(m)
40
Richmond, VA
—
144
—
863
—
144
863
1,007
96
2012
02/12
(m)
40
Danville, VA
—
155
—
864
—
155
864
1,019
100
2012
03/12
(m)
40
Cascade, VA
—
139
—
806
—
139
806
945
92
2012
03/12
(m)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-21
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Sanford, NC
—
147
—
834
—
147
834
981
91
2012
04/12
(m)
40
Leland, NC
—
245
—
892
—
245
892
1,137
94
2012
06/12
(m)
40
Sanford, NC
—
206
—
829
—
206
829
1,035
87
2012
07/12
(m)
40
Richmond, VA
—
305
—
902
—
305
902
1,207
93
2012
08/12
(m)
40
Martinsville, VA
—
165
—
831
—
165
831
996
84
2012
09/12
(m)
40
Yerington, NV
—
313
—
1,170
—
313
1,170
1,483
116
2013
09/12
(m)
40
Hawthorne, NV
—
210
1,069
—
—
210
1,069
1,279
108
2012
12/12
40
Norfolk, VA
—
455
—
929
—
455
929
1,384
82
2013
03/13
(m)
40
Suffolk, VA
—
186
—
958
—
186
958
1,144
85
2013
03/13
(m)
40
Suffolk, VA
—
128
—
1,010
—
128
1,010
1,138
85
2013
04/13
(m)
40
Irving, NY
—
210
—
961
—
210
961
1,171
77
2013
06/13
(m)
40
Oakfield, NY
—
257
—
1,108
—
271
1,108
1,379
75
2014
10/13
(m)
40
Holland, NY
—
176
—
1,103
—
176
1,103
1,279
68
2014
12/13
(m)
40
Jeffersonville, IN
—
115
960
—
—
115
960
1,075
79
2010
02/14
35
LaFayette, LA
—
157
378
—
—
157
378
535
37
2002
07/14
25
Youngsville, LA
—
98
370
—
—
98
370
468
36
2002
07/14
25
Dollar Tree:
Garland, TX
—
239
626
—
—
239
626
865
243
1994
02/94
40
Homestead, PA
—
256
—
1,964
—
310
1,910
2,220
42
2016
02/97
(g)
40
Copperas Cove, TX
—
242
512
194
—
242
706
948
451
1972
11/98
40
Marietta, GA
—
525
—
787
—
524
787
1,311
49
1997
12/14
(o)
30
Don Tello's Tex-Mex Grill:
Lithonia, GA
—
923
1,276
27
—
923
1,303
2,226
307
2002
06/07
40
Dr. Clean Dry Cleaners:
Monticello, NY
—
20
72
—
—
20
72
92
21
1996
03/05
40
Eagle Tax Center:
Hollywood, FL
—
203
46
19
—
124
—
124
—
1960
12/05
15
Ecotech Institute:
Aurora, CO
—
5,076
13,874
5,663
—
5,041
19,537
24,578
4,288
1986
04/07
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-22
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Austin, TX
—
2,291
1,770
4,999
—
2,291
6,769
9,060
850
1996
12/11
35
El Jalapeno:
Indianapolis, IN
—
223
483
79
—
223
562
785
273
1979
09/06
20
Empire Buffet:
Las Cruces, NM
—
947
—
2,390
—
947
2,390
3,337
577
2006
01/06
(m)
40
Encore at Crosswoods:
Columbus, OH
—
1,032
1,107
—
—
1,032
1,107
2,139
416
1998
12/01
40
Express Mart:
Thomasville, NC
—
140
228
—
—
140
228
368
28
1962
07/14
20
Express Oil Change:
Birmingham, AL
—
470
695
—
—
470
695
1,165
153
2008
02/08
(f)
40
Florence, AL
—
110
381
—
—
110
381
491
113
1987
02/08
30
Helena, AL
—
363
628
—
—
363
628
991
139
1998
02/08
40
Muscle Shoals, AL
—
168
624
—
—
168
624
792
185
1985
02/08
30
Opelika, AL
—
547
680
—
—
547
680
1,227
151
2006
02/08
40
Cordova, TN
—
639
785
—
—
639
785
1,424
158
2000
12/08
40
Horn Lake, MS
—
326
611
—
—
326
611
937
140
1998
12/08
35
Lakeland, TN
—
186
489
—
—
186
489
675
98
2000
12/08
40
Memphis, TN
—
402
721
—
—
402
721
1,123
145
2001
12/08
40
Houston, TX
—
651
—
648
—
543
648
1,191
72
2012
02/12
(m)
40
Katy, TX
—
539
—
830
—
539
829
1,368
84
2012
07/12
(m)
40
Chattanooga, TN
—
239
1,214
—
—
239
1,214
1,453
170
1998
10/12
30
Chattanooga, TN
—
224
173
—
—
224
173
397
24
2001
10/12
30
Chattanooga, TN
—
238
1,756
—
—
238
1,756
1,994
246
1998
10/12
30
Cleveland, TN
—
318
1,064
—
—
318
1,064
1,382
128
2004
10/12
35
Fort Oglethorpe, GA
—
241
331
—
—
241
331
572
40
2003
10/12
35
Marietta, GA
—
618
30
—
—
618
30
648
4
1988
12/12
30
Smyrna, GA
—
295
1,092
—
—
295
1,092
1,387
177
1984
12/12
25
Houston, TX
—
550
—
983
—
550
983
1,533
46
2014
05/14
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-23
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Boaz, AL
—
205
368
—
—
205
368
573
28
1995
01/15
25
Gadsden, AL
—
116
690
—
—
116
690
806
44
1999
01/15
30
Rainbow City, AL
—
164
653
—
—
164
653
817
50
1992
01/15
25
Seffner, FL
—
155
593
—
—
155
593
748
31
2008
02/15
35
Fayetteville, TN
—
117
860
—
—
117
860
977
49
1998
04/15
30
Huntsville, AL
—
292
526
—
—
292
526
818
30
1995
04/15
30
Huntsville, AL
—
214
710
—
—
214
710
924
48
1995
04/15
25
Madison, AL
—
319
1,006
—
—
319
1,006
1,325
57
1992
04/15
30
Houston, TX
—
576
—
1,017
—
576
1,017
1,593
3
2016
04/16
(m)
(k)
Tampa, FL
—
718
—
1,020
—
718
1,020
1,738
1
2016
06/16
(m)
(k)
West Point, MS
—
335
—
—
—
335
(e)
335
(e)
(e)
10/16
(m)
Fallas Paredes:
Arlington, TX
—
318
1,680
242
—
318
1,923
2,241
931
1996
06/96
38
Houston, TX
—
2,311
1,628
270
—
2,583
1,628
4,211
724
1976
03/99
(g)
40
Family Dollar:
Albany, NY
—
34
824
—
—
34
824
858
253
1992
09/04
40
Cohoes, NY
—
140
753
49
—
140
802
942
265
1994
09/04
40
Hudson Falls, NY
—
51
380
625
—
187
869
1,056
163
1993
09/04
40
Monticello, NY
—
96
352
—
—
96
352
448
104
1996
03/05
40
Richmond, TX
—
366
1,059
—
—
366
1,059
1,425
87
2012
02/14
35
Spring, TX
—
199
1,152
—
—
199
1,152
1,351
95
2012
02/14
35
Bartlesville, OK
—
110
445
—
—
110
445
555
44
2001
07/14
25
Huntsville, AL
—
141
596
—
—
141
596
737
49
2005
07/14
30
Tulsa, OK
—
70
519
—
—
70
519
589
51
2001
07/14
25
Famous Footwear:
Lapeer, MI
—
163
835
—
—
163
812
975
191
2007
10/05
40
Famsa:
Harlingen, TX
—
317
756
170
—
317
926
1,243
351
1999
11/98
(f)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-24
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Ferguson:
Destin, FL
—
554
1,012
253
—
554
1,265
1,819
301
2006
03/07
40
Union City, GA
—
144
1,260
—
—
144
1,260
1,404
203
2010
05/11
35
Fikes Wholesale:
Belton, TX
—
722
1,814
—
—
722
1,814
2,536
279
2007
08/11
35
Godley, TX
—
1,453
2,084
—
—
1,453
2,084
3,537
320
2008
08/11
35
Killeen, TX
—
1,053
833
—
—
1,053
833
1,886
128
2007
08/11
35
Killeen, TX
—
1,302
2,514
—
—
1,302
2,514
3,816
386
2008
08/11
35
McGregor, TX
—
511
1,484
—
—
511
1,484
1,995
228
2006
08/11
35
Thorndale, TX
—
331
984
—
—
331
984
1,315
151
2007
08/11
35
Valley Mills, TX
—
711
2,114
—
—
711
2,114
2,825
325
2006
08/11
35
West, TX
—
402
864
—
—
402
864
1,266
155
1999
08/11
30
Gladewater, TX
—
145
2,107
—
—
145
2,107
2,252
138
2007
09/14
35
Hearne, TX
—
68
2,184
—
—
68
2,184
2,252
167
1996
09/14
30
Jarrell, TX
—
541
2,965
—
—
541
2,965
3,506
194
2009
09/14
35
Killeen, TX
—
628
2,878
—
—
628
2,878
3,506
188
2013
09/14
35
Liberty Hill, TX
—
203
3,303
—
—
203
3,303
3,506
216
2013
09/14
35
Rosebud, TX
—
58
1,847
—
—
58
1,847
1,905
121
2012
09/14
35
Temple, TX (n)
—
1,052
3,302
—
—
1,052
3,302
4,354
216
2012
09/14
35
Waco, TX
—
1,400
2,106
—
—
1,400
2,106
3,506
161
1997
09/14
30
Claude, TX
—
193
3,728
—
—
193
3,728
3,921
111
2013
12/15
35
Covington, TX
—
164
2,512
—
—
164
2,512
2,676
87
2001
12/15
30
Hamilton, TX
—
97
2,175
—
—
97
2,175
2,272
91
1987
12/15
25
Lott, TX
—
135
3,236
—
—
135
3,236
3,371
96
2013
12/15
35
Salado, TX
—
715
3,206
—
—
715
3,206
3,921
95
2014
12/15
35
Temple, TX
—
77
2,291
—
—
77
2,291
2,368
68
2012
12/15
35
Vernon, TX
—
154
5,850
—
—
154
5,850
6,004
152
2015
12/15
40
Milton, FL
—
1,498
—
3,289
—
1,498
3,289
4,787
3
2016
04/16
(m)
(k)
Giddings, TX
—
845
—
—
—
845
(e)
845
(e)
(e)
11/16
(m)
Daphne, AL
—
1,411
1,247
—
—
1,411
1,247
2,658
2
2006
12/16
30
Foley, AL
—
783
1,721
—
—
783
1,721
2,504
2
2007
12/16
40
First Cash Pawn:
Alice, TX
—
318
578
—
—
318
578
896
217
1995
12/01
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-25
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Five Below:
Florissant, MO
—
249
294
849
—
250
1,142
1,392
212
1996
04/03
(g)
40
Five Guys Burgers and Fries:
Middleburg Heights, OH
—
497
260
250
—
497
510
1,007
200
1976
09/06
20
Flash Markets:
Lebanon, TN
—
582
—
2,063
—
582
2,063
2,645
458
2007
03/07
(m)
40
Fleming's:
Akron, OH
—
475
3,140
—
—
475
3,140
3,615
430
2005
03/12
35
Floor & Decor:
Knoxville, TN
—
2,364
—
7,879
—
2,364
7,879
10,243
189
2016
09/15
(m)
40
Food 4 Less:
Chula Vista, CA
—
3,569
—
—
—
3,569
(c)
3,569
(c)
1995
11/98
(c)
Food Fast:
Bossier City, LA
—
883
658
—
—
883
658
1,541
419
1975
06/07
15
Brownsboro, TX
—
328
385
—
—
328
385
713
122
1990
06/07
30
Flint, TX
—
272
411
—
—
272
411
683
157
1985
06/07
25
Forney, TX
—
545
707
—
—
545
707
1,252
225
1989
06/07
30
Forney, TX
—
473
654
—
—
473
654
1,127
208
1990
06/07
30
Gun Barrel City, TX
—
270
386
—
—
270
386
656
147
1986
06/07
25
Gun Barrel City, TX
—
242
467
—
—
242
467
709
178
1988
06/07
25
Jacksonville, TX
—
660
632
—
—
660
632
1,292
402
1976
06/07
15
Kemp, TX
—
581
505
—
—
581
505
1,086
193
1986
06/07
25
Longview, TX
—
360
535
—
—
360
535
895
204
1983
06/07
25
Longview, TX
—
403
572
—
—
403
572
975
218
1985
06/07
25
Longview, TX
—
252
304
—
—
252
304
556
116
1983
06/07
25
Longview, TX
—
426
382
—
—
426
382
808
146
1984
06/07
25
Longview, TX
—
271
431
—
—
271
431
702
137
1990
06/07
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-26
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Mabank, TX
—
229
494
—
—
229
494
723
188
1986
06/07
25
Mt. Vernon, TX
—
292
666
2,800
—
292
2,800
3,092
260
2013
06/07
(m)
40
Tyler, TX
—
323
283
—
—
323
283
606
135
1978
06/07
20
Tyler, TX
—
742
546
—
—
742
546
1,288
208
1985
06/07
25
Tyler, TX
—
188
329
—
—
188
329
517
125
1984
06/07
25
Tyler, TX
—
542
403
—
—
481
403
884
154
1984
06/07
25
Tyler, TX
—
488
831
—
—
488
831
1,319
397
1980
06/07
20
Tyler, TX
—
316
545
—
—
316
545
861
173
1989
06/07
30
Fort Ticonderoga:
Ticonderoga, NY
—
89
689
60
—
89
749
838
221
1993
09/04
40
Fresenius Medical Care:
Houston, TX
—
422
1,915
518
—
422
2,434
2,856
633
1995
08/06
40
Rockford, MI
—
226
1,404
—
—
226
1,404
1,630
115
2002
07/14
30
Fresh Market:
Gainesville, FL
—
317
1,248
656
—
317
1,904
2,221
573
1982
03/99
40
Frisch's Big Boy:
Batavia, OH
—
319
2,637
—
—
319
2,637
2,956
121
1995
08/15
30
Bethel, OH
—
242
2,512
—
—
242
2,512
2,754
138
1982
08/15
25
Burlington, KY
—
589
2,357
—
—
589
2,357
2,946
108
1995
08/15
30
Cincinnati, OH
—
271
939
—
—
271
939
1,210
52
1994
08/15
25
Cincinnati, OH
—
638
1,845
—
—
638
1,845
2,483
101
1993
08/15
25
Cincinnati, OH
—
695
2,173
—
—
695
2,173
2,868
100
1982
08/15
30
Cincinnati, OH
—
183
3,283
—
—
183
3,283
3,466
181
1980
08/15
25
Cincinnati, OH
—
976
1,806
—
—
976
1,806
2,782
71
2011
08/15
35
Cincinnati, OH
—
329
1,672
—
—
329
1,672
2,001
92
1988
08/15
25
Cincinnati, OH
—
319
2,753
—
—
319
2,753
3,072
126
2007
08/15
30
Cincinnati, OH
—
290
3,100
—
—
290
3,100
3,390
171
1985
08/15
25
Cincinnati, OH
—
754
1,044
—
—
754
1,044
1,798
48
1997
08/15
30
Cincinnati, OH
—
782
1,961
—
—
782
1,961
2,743
108
1973
08/15
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-27
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Cincinnati, OH
—
300
1,952
—
—
300
1,952
2,252
107
1990
08/15
25
Cincinnati, OH
—
445
929
—
—
445
929
1,374
43
2005
08/15
30
Cincinnati, OH
—
541
1,981
—
—
541
1,981
2,522
109
1964
08/15
25
Cincinnati, OH
—
435
3,457
—
—
435
3,457
3,892
190
1970
08/15
25
Cincinnati, OH
—
734
1,768
—
—
734
1,768
2,502
97
1991
08/15
25
Cincinnati, OH
—
387
1,865
—
—
387
1,865
2,252
85
1996
08/15
30
Cincinnati, OH
—
657
1,874
—
—
657
1,874
2,531
103
1986
08/15
25
Cold Spring, KY
—
763
2,144
—
—
763
2,144
2,907
98
1993
08/15
30
Covington, KY
—
522
2,444
—
—
522
2,444
2,966
112
1991
08/15
30
Dayton, OH
—
464
2,029
—
—
464
2,029
2,493
93
1988
08/15
30
Dayton, OH
—
589
1,662
—
—
589
1,662
2,251
76
2006
08/15
30
Dayton, OH
—
348
1,633
—
—
348
1,633
1,981
90
1990
08/15
25
Dayton, OH
—
445
1,276
—
—
445
1,276
1,721
50
2008
08/15
35
Dayton, OH
—
407
349
—
—
407
349
756
14
2010
08/15
35
Dayton, OH
—
261
1,392
—
—
261
1,392
1,653
77
1985
08/15
25
Eaton, OH
—
319
1,267
—
—
319
1,267
1,586
70
1992
08/15
25
Englewood, OH
—
348
1,846
—
—
348
1,846
2,194
102
1976
08/15
25
Erlanger, KY
—
425
1,740
—
—
425
1,740
2,165
96
1991
08/15
25
Fairborn, OH
—
348
1,305
—
—
348
1,305
1,653
60
1989
08/15
30
Fairfield, OH
—
580
1,556
—
—
580
1,556
2,136
86
1976
08/15
25
Florence, KY
—
850
1,971
—
—
850
1,971
2,821
90
2001
08/15
30
Florence, KY
—
860
1,903
—
—
860
1,903
2,763
105
1986
08/15
25
Fort Mitchell, KY
—
792
3,051
—
—
792
3,051
3,843
140
1988
08/15
30
Franklin, OH
—
415
2,425
—
—
415
2,425
2,840
111
1987
08/15
30
Franklin, OH
—
406
1,749
—
—
406
1,749
2,155
96
1977
08/15
25
Gahanna, OH
—
389
165
—
—
389
165
554
8
1994
08/15
30
Greensburg, IN
—
464
1,575
—
—
464
1,575
2,039
72
1990
08/15
30
Grove City, OH
—
406
1,846
—
—
406
1,846
2,252
85
1993
08/15
30
Groveport, OH
—
145
1,084
—
—
145
1,084
1,229
50
1992
08/15
30
Hamilton, OH
—
310
1,045
—
—
310
1,045
1,355
57
1968
08/15
25
Hamilton, OH
—
560
1,894
—
—
560
1,894
2,454
87
2009
08/15
30
Harrison, OH
—
338
2,685
—
—
338
2,685
3,023
123
1989
08/15
30
Heath, OH
—
939
348
—
—
939
348
1,287
14
2011
08/15
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-28
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Hillsboro, OH
—
502
2,926
—
—
502
2,926
3,428
161
1980
08/15
25
Independence, KY
—
657
1,816
—
—
657
1,816
2,473
83
2009
08/15
30
Lancaster, OH
—
570
1,604
—
—
570
1,604
2,174
74
1992
08/15
30
Lawrenceburg, IN
—
550
3,071
—
—
550
3,071
3,621
121
2010
08/15
35
Lebanon, OH
—
560
2,550
—
—
560
2,550
3,110
117
2006
08/15
30
Lexington, KY
—
734
1,382
—
—
734
1,382
2,116
54
2013
08/15
35
Lexington, KY
—
647
2,289
—
—
647
2,289
2,936
126
1976
08/15
25
Louisville, KY
—
891
97
—
—
891
97
988
4
1994
08/15
30
Louisville, KY
—
628
1,691
—
—
628
1,691
2,319
78
1990
08/15
30
Loveland, OH
—
241
2,666
—
—
241
2,666
2,907
147
1980
08/15
25
Loveland, OH
—
184
1,740
—
—
184
1,740
1,924
80
1990
08/15
30
Marysville, OH
—
281
823
—
—
281
823
1,104
38
1993
08/15
30
Mason, OH
—
531
1,981
—
—
531
1,981
2,512
109
1987
08/15
25
Maysville, KY
—
454
3,119
—
—
454
3,119
3,573
172
1992
08/15
25
Miamisburg, OH
—
551
1,701
—
—
551
1,701
2,252
94
1970
08/15
25
Middletown, OH
—
823
310
—
—
823
310
1,133
12
2013
08/15
35
Middletown, OH
—
155
1,952
—
—
155
1,952
2,107
107
1966
08/15
25
Milford, OH
—
309
1,942
—
—
309
1,942
2,251
107
1960
08/15
25
New Albany, IN
—
493
1,238
—
—
493
1,238
1,731
57
1995
08/15
30
Shepherdsville, KY
—
793
1,092
—
—
793
1,092
1,885
50
2009
08/15
30
Springfield, OH
—
560
1,691
—
—
560
1,691
2,251
78
2007
08/15
30
Tipp City, OH
—
503
919
—
—
503
919
1,422
42
1996
08/15
30
Troy, OH
—
445
1,807
—
—
445
1,807
2,252
83
1987
08/15
30
Urbana, OH
—
252
1,142
—
—
252
1,142
1,394
63
1991
08/15
25
Washington, OH
—
300
1,672
—
—
300
1,672
1,972
77
1990
08/15
30
Wilmington, OH
—
377
2,502
—
—
377
2,502
2,879
138
1973
08/15
25
Winchester, KY
—
348
1,325
—
—
348
1,325
1,673
61
2008
08/15
30
Xenia, OH
—
261
2,299
—
—
261
2,299
2,560
105
1986
08/15
30
Fuel Up:
Chambersburg, PA
—
76
197
—
—
76
197
273
112
1990
08/05
20
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-29
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Fuel-On:
Bloomsburg, PA
—
541
146
—
—
541
146
687
83
1967
08/05
20
Emporium, PA
—
380
569
—
—
380
569
949
323
1996
08/05
20
Johnsonburg, PA
—
781
504
—
—
781
504
1,285
286
1978
08/05
20
Kane, PA
—
478
592
—
—
356
—
356
—
1984
08/05
0
Luzerne, PA
—
171
415
—
—
171
415
586
236
1989
08/05
20
Ridgway, PA
—
382
259
—
—
382
259
641
147
1975
08/05
20
St. Mary's, PA
—
274
261
—
—
274
261
535
148
1979
08/05
20
White Haven, PA (n)
—
486
867
—
—
486
867
1,353
493
1990
08/05
20
Danville, PA
—
180
359
—
—
180
359
539
98
1988
01/06
40
Houtzdale, PA
—
541
500
—
—
356
—
356
—
1977
01/06
0
Minersville, PA
—
680
582
—
—
680
582
1,262
159
1974
01/06
40
Pittsburgh, PA
—
905
1,346
—
—
905
1,346
2,251
369
1967
01/06
40
Zelienople, PA
—
160
437
—
—
160
437
597
120
1988
01/06
40
Fuji Japanese Steakhouse:
Farmington, NM
—
2,757
—
773
—
2,757
773
3,530
159
2003
12/07
(o)
40
Furniture Bank:
Columbus, OH
—
1,596
934
226
—
1,605
1,152
2,757
295
1970
11/04
(o)
40
Furr's Family Dining:
Moore, OK
—
939
—
2,429
—
939
2,429
3,368
559
2007
03/07
(m)
40
Arlington, TX
—
1,061
—
1,594
—
1,061
1,594
2,655
247
2010
04/10
(m)
40
McAllen, TX
—
520
1,700
—
—
520
1,700
2,220
286
2004
12/11
30
Gander Mountain:
Florence, AL
—
1,034
—
4,315
—
851
4,315
5,166
463
2012
06/04
(m)
40
Amarillo, TX
—
1,514
5,781
—
—
1,514
5,781
7,295
1,752
2004
11/04
40
DeForest, WI
—
2,798
10,953
2,500
—
2,787
13,413
16,200
2,308
2008
09/10
35
Springfield, IL
—
1,717
7,622
—
—
1,717
7,622
9,339
1,370
2009
09/10
35
Onalaska, WI
—
1,963
—
6,817
—
1,733
6,817
8,550
973
2011
10/10
(m)
40
Ocala, FL
—
3,315
8,908
—
—
3,315
8,908
12,223
1,580
2008
10/10
35
Bowling Green, KY
—
1,777
7,319
—
—
1,777
7,319
9,096
1,141
2007
07/11
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-30
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Eau Claire, WI
—
2,263
8,418
—
—
2,263
8,418
10,681
1,313
2008
07/11
35
Roanoke, VA
—
1,769
8,120
—
—
1,769
8,120
9,889
1,266
2008
07/11
35
Greenfield, IN
—
878
—
6,166
—
878
6,166
7,044
405
2014
12/13
(m)
40
Lakeville, MN
—
3,243
11,191
—
—
3,243
11,191
14,434
668
2003
03/15
30
Chesterfield, MO
—
3,424
—
7,711
—
3,424
7,711
11,135
217
2015
06/15
(m)
40
Gate Petroleum:
Concord, NC
—
852
1,201
—
—
852
1,201
2,053
346
2001
06/05
40
Rocky Mount, NC
—
259
1,164
—
—
259
1,164
1,423
336
2000
06/05
40
Gerber Collision:
Garner, NC
—
352
1,056
—
—
352
1,056
1,408
200
1972
03/13
20
Estero, FL
—
839
—
2,135
—
839
2,135
2,974
53
2015
10/14
(m)
(k)
Woodstock, GA
—
328
1,291
—
—
328
1,291
1,619
91
1990
11/14
30
Roswell, GA
—
958
—
1,920
—
961
1,920
2,881
138
2015
12/14
(m)
25
Tucson, AZ
—
330
1,746
—
—
330
1,746
2,076
97
2008
01/15
35
Tucson, AZ
—
242
1,518
—
—
242
1,518
1,760
99
2002
01/15
30
Global:
Augusta, ME
—
234
1,384
—
—
234
1,384
1,618
30
1987
06/16
25
Bedford, NH
—
332
907
—
—
332
907
1,239
20
1980
06/16
25
Bridgeport, CT
—
331
1,762
—
—
331
1,762
2,093
38
1979
06/16
25
Derry, NH
—
176
1,044
—
—
176
1,044
1,220
23
1987
06/16
25
Dover, NH
—
497
926
—
—
497
926
1,423
17
2004
06/16
30
Epping, NH
—
798
1,363
—
—
798
1,363
2,161
25
1998
06/16
30
Exeter, NH
—
593
3,258
—
—
593
3,258
3,851
59
2001
06/16
30
Fitzwilliam, NH
—
146
2,404
—
—
146
2,404
2,550
52
1993
06/16
25
Gardner, MA
—
88
2,764
—
—
88
2,764
2,852
60
1968
06/16
25
Hanover, MA
—
380
1,131
—
—
380
1,131
1,511
24
1991
06/16
25
Johnston, RI
—
478
1,082
—
—
478
1,082
1,560
23
1992
06/16
25
Manchester, CT
—
584
1,869
—
—
584
1,869
2,453
40
1983
06/16
25
Middleton, MA
—
331
1,694
—
—
331
1,694
2,025
31
2001
06/16
30
Milford, MA
—
642
1,869
—
—
642
1,869
2,511
40
1972
06/16
25
Nashua, NH
—
351
1,160
—
—
351
1,160
1,511
25
1991
06/16
25
North Easton, MA
—
1,293
2,917
—
—
1,293
2,917
4,210
53
2005
06/16
30
Portland, ME
—
361
732
—
—
361
732
1,093
16
1987
06/16
25
Saugus, MA
—
885
3,209
—
—
885
3,209
4,094
58
1997
06/16
30
Scarborough, ME
—
662
1,393
—
—
662
1,393
2,055
25
1998
06/16
30
Tewksbury, MA
—
449
839
—
—
449
839
1,288
15
2000
06/16
30
Townsend, MA
—
195
1,695
—
—
195
1,695
1,890
37
1983
06/16
25
Waltham, MA
—
467
1,995
—
—
467
1,995
2,462
43
1983
06/16
25
Warwick, RI
—
633
1,120
—
—
633
1,120
1,753
20
2004
06/16
30
Waterville, ME
—
49
1,112
—
—
49
1,112
1,161
24
1987
06/16
25
Westerly, RI
—
506
2,141
—
—
506
2,141
2,647
39
1998
06/16
30
Westerly, RI
—
351
1,830
—
—
351
1,830
2,181
40
1989
06/16
25
Westford, MA
—
448
1,072
—
—
448
1,072
1,520
19
1998
06/16
30
Weymouth, MA
—
214
1,802
—
—
214
1,802
2,016
39
1960
06/16
25
Wyoming, RI
—
409
1,276
—
—
409
1,276
1,685
23
1999
06/16
30
York, ME
—
175
2,812
—
—
175
2,812
2,987
61
1990
06/16
25
Golden Corral:
Lake Placid, FL
—
115
305
54
—
115
359
474
322
1985
05/85
35
Tampa, FL
—
1,188
1,339
—
—
1,188
1,339
2,527
504
1998
12/01
40
Temple Terrace, FL
—
1,330
1,391
—
—
1,330
1,391
2,721
523
1997
12/01
40
Davenport, IA
—
923
2,122
—
—
923
2,122
3,045
114
1998
02/15
35
Orange Park, FL
—
1,074
1,794
—
—
1,074
1,794
2,868
112
1995
02/15
30
Pensacola, FL
—
1,344
3,212
—
—
1,344
3,212
4,556
172
1999
02/15
35
Goodwill:
Sealy, TX
—
612
675
644
—
612
1,319
1,931
398
1982
03/99
40
Fort Worth, TX
—
988
2,368
32
—
988
2,401
3,389
705
1997
02/05
40
Goodyear Truck & Tire:
Anthony, TX
—
(l)
1,242
6
—
(l)
1,248
1,248
294
2007
02/07
40
Beaverdam, OH
—
(l)
1,521
—
—
(l)
1,521
1,521
366
2004
05/07
40
Benton, AR
—
(l)
309
—
—
(l)
309
309
73
2001
05/07
40
Bowman, SC
—
(l)
969
—
—
(l)
969
969
267
1998
05/07
35
Dalton, GA
—
(l)
1,541
—
—
(l)
1,541
1,541
371
2004
05/07
40
Dandridge, TN
—
(l)
1,030
—
—
(l)
1,030
1,030
283
1989
05/07
35
Franklin, OH
—
(l)
563
—
—
(l)
563
563
155
1998
05/07
35
Gary, IN
—
(l)
1,486
—
—
(l)
1,486
1,486
358
2004
05/07
40
Georgetown, KY
—
(l)
679
—
—
(l)
679
679
218
1997
05/07
30
Mebane, NC
—
(l)
561
—
—
(l)
561
561
154
1998
05/07
35
Piedmont, SC
—
(l)
567
—
—
(l)
567
567
156
1999
05/07
35
Port Wentworth, GA
—
(l)
552
—
—
(l)
552
552
152
1998
05/07
35
Valdosta, GA
—
(l)
1,477
—
—
(l)
1,477
1,477
355
2004
05/07
40
Temple, GA
—
(l)
1,065
—
—
(l)
1,065
1,065
243
2007
06/07
40
Whiteland, IN
—
(l)
1,471
—
—
(l)
1,471
1,471
348
2004
07/07
40
Des Moines, IA
—
(l)
816
—
—
(l)
816
816
193
1987
07/07
40
Robinson, TX
—
(l)
1,183
—
—
(l)
1,183
1,183
270
2007
07/07
40
Kearney, MO
—
(l)
1,269
—
—
(l)
1,269
1,269
300
2003
07/07
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
(l)
1,247
—
—
(l)
1,247
1,247
277
2008
08/07
40
Amarillo, TX
—
(l)
1,158
—
—
(l)
1,158
1,158
247
2008
02/08
40
Jackson, MS
—
(l)
1,281
—
—
(l)
1,281
1,281
271
2008
03/08
40
Glendale, KY
—
(l)
1,066
—
—
(l)
1,066
1,066
219
2008
07/08
40
Lebanon, TN
—
(l)
1,331
—
—
(l)
1,331
1,331
268
2008
08/08
(p)
40
Laredo, TX
—
(l)
1,238
—
—
(l)
1,238
1,238
241
2009
11/08
(p)
40
Midland, TX
—
(l)
1,148
—
—
(l)
1,148
1,148
185
2010
04/10
(p)
40
Tuscaloosa, AL
—
(l)
1,002
—
—
(l)
1,002
1,002
151
2010
08/10
(p)
40
Kenly, NC
—
(l)
1,066
—
—
(l)
1,066
1,066
157
2011
11/10
(p)
40
Matthews, MO
—
(l)
1,042
50
—
(l)
1,092
1,092
150
2011
01/11
(p)
40
Baytown, TX
—
(l)
—
1,375
—
(l)
1,375
1,375
185
2011
05/11
(p)
40
Sunbury, OH
—
(l)
—
1,424
—
(l)
1,424
1,424
179
2011
06/11
(p)
40
Greenwood, LA
—
(l)
—
1,291
—
(l)
1,291
1,291
165
2011
06/11
(p)
40
Joplin, MO
—
(l)
—
1,168
—
(l)
1,168
1,168
150
2011
06/11
(p)
40
Winslow, AZ
—
(l)
—
1,613
—
(l)
1,613
1,613
197
2012
09/11
(p)
40
Gulfport, MS
—
(l)
—
1,377
—
(l)
1,377
1,377
162
2012
11/11
(p)
40
Sulphur Springs, TX
—
(l)
—
1,283
—
(l)
1,283
1,283
148
2012
12/11
(p)
40
Walcott, IA
—
(l)
—
1,673
—
(l)
1,673
1,673
47
2015
07/15
(p)
40
S. Beloit, IL
—
(l)
—
1,927
—
(l)
1,927
1,927
42
2016
08/15
(p)
40
Eloy, AZ
—
(l)
—
1,739
—
(l)
1,739
1,739
38
2016
10/15
(p)
40
Gordmans:
Avon, IN
—
1,302
—
4,178
—
1,302
4,178
5,480
466
2012
12/11
(m)
40
Wyoming, MI
—
1,322
—
4,447
—
1,322
4,447
5,769
273
2014
10/13
(m)
40
Saginaw, MI
—
763
—
4,088
—
763
4,088
4,851
251
2014
02/14
(m)
40
Great Clips:
Swansea, IL
—
46
132
157
—
46
290
336
44
1997
12/01
(g)
40
Lapeer, MI
—
27
194
—
—
27
184
211
44
2007
10/05
40
Green Light Convenience:
Moosic, PA
—
323
309
—
—
323
309
632
176
1980
08/05
20
Guitar Center:
Roseville, MN
—
1,599
1,419
23
—
1,599
1,442
3,041
394
1994
08/06
40
H&R Block:
Swansea, IL
—
46
132
69
—
46
201
247
100
1997
12/01
40
Bristol, VA
—
63
184
40
—
63
224
287
19
2000
07/14
25
Harbor Freight Tools:
Federal Way, WA
—
2,037
1,662
438
—
2,037
2,100
4,137
888
1994
06/98
40
Gastonia, NC
—
994
1,513
146
—
994
1,659
2,653
478
2004
12/04
40
Plainfield, IN
—
503
—
1,633
—
503
1,633
2,136
102
1972
12/14
(o)
30
Houma, LA
—
1,037
—
—
—
1,037
(e)
1,037
(e)
(e)
08/16
(m)
(e)
Hardee's:
Savannah, TN (n)
—
151
713
—
—
151
713
864
67
1988
02/15
20
Warrenton, NC (n)
—
143
633
—
—
143
633
776
40
1960
02/15
30
Harvey's Bar & Grill:
Bay City, MI
—
647
634
—
—
647
634
1,281
238
1997
12/01
40
Havertys Furniture:
Pensacola, FL
—
633
1,595
66
—
603
1,661
2,264
827
1994
06/96
40
Bowie, MD
—
1,966
4,221
—
—
1,966
4,221
6,187
1,914
1997
12/97
39
Health Source Chiropractic:
Houston, TX
—
112
509
302
—
112
811
923
170
1995
08/06
40
Healthy Pet:
Suwanee, GA
—
175
1,038
—
—
175
1,038
1,213
261
1997
12/06
40
Colonial Heights, VA
—
160
746
—
—
160
746
906
186
1996
01/07
40
Hear USA:
Lapeer, MI
—
29
211
—
—
29
201
230
48
2007
10/05
40
Hibbett Sports:
Sealy, TX
—
208
230
278
—
208
508
716
109
1982
03/99
(g)
40
Hobby Lobby:
Beavercreek, OH
—
1,837
—
3,790
—
1,926
3,701
5,627
96
2015
08/15
(m)
40
Hollywood Feed:
Ridgeland, MS
—
343
411
362
—
343
773
1,116
150
1997
08/06
40
Home Decor:
Memphis, TN
—
549
540
364
—
549
904
1,453
389
1998
12/97
40
Home Depot:
Sunrise, FL
—
5,149
—
—
—
5,149
(i)
5,149
(i)
(i)
05/03
(i)
HomeGoods:
Fairfax, VA
—
523
756
1,585
—
971
2,341
3,312
940
1995
12/95
40
Hometown Urgent Care:
Warren, OH
—
562
468
100
—
562
568
1,130
192
1997
12/01
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-31
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Hooters:
Tampa, FL
—
784
505
450
—
784
955
1,739
209
1993
12/01
40
Hudson Grille:
Alpharetta, GA
—
3,033
1,642
—
—
3,033
1,642
4,675
617
1999
12/01
40
Humana:
Sunrise, FL
—
800
253
—
—
800
253
1,053
80
1984
05/04
40
Hy-Vee:
St. Joseph, MO
—
1,580
2,849
—
—
1,580
2,849
4,429
1,018
1991
09/02
40
Insurance Auto Auctions:
New Orleans, LA
—
1,445
—
4,123
—
1,445
3,987
5,432
437
1993
06/13
(o)
30
E Dundee, IL
—
2,772
—
8,320
—
2,772
8,320
11,092
416
2014
01/14
(m)
40
Bergen, NY
—
762
—
3,201
—
762
3,201
3,963
70
2016
08/15
(m)
40
Eminence, KY
—
724
4,928
—
—
724
4,928
5,652
41
2015
09/16
35
Meridian, ID
—
1,076
4,486
—
—
1,076
4,486
5,562
5
2006
10/16
(o)
(k)
Flint, MI
—
1,049
—
—
—
1,049
(e)
1,049
(e)
(e)
10/16
(m)
(m)
Int'l House of Pancakes:
Midwest City, OK
—
407
—
—
—
407
(i)
407
(i)
(i)
11/00
(i)
Ankeny, IA
—
693
515
—
—
693
515
1,208
198
2002
06/05
30
ISD Renal:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
406
4,036
—
—
406
4,036
4,442
678
1978
12/11
30
Kendallville, IN
—
66
2,748
—
—
66
2,748
2,814
396
2007
12/11
35
Memphis, TN
—
180
3,223
—
—
180
3,223
3,403
542
2002
12/11
30
Memphis, TN
—
283
4,146
—
—
283
4,146
4,429
697
2001
12/11
30
J & J Insurance:
Hollywood, FL
—
195
44
18
—
119
—
119
—
1960
12/05
15
Jack in the Box:
Plano, TX
—
1,055
1,237
—
—
1,055
1,237
2,292
357
2001
06/05
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-32
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Jack's:
Blounstville, AL
—
435
1,543
—
—
435
1,543
1,978
62
1997
10/15
30
Centre, AL
—
128
2,648
—
—
128
2,648
2,776
91
2006
10/15
35
Collinsville, AL
—
119
1,968
—
—
119
1,968
2,087
95
1994
10/15
25
Demopolis, AL
—
208
1,514
—
—
208
1,514
1,722
52
2007
10/15
35
Geraldine, AL
—
119
2,125
—
—
119
2,125
2,244
86
1998
10/15
30
Guin, AL
—
89
1,652
—
—
89
1,652
1,741
67
1999
10/15
30
Hanceville, AL
—
544
1,779
—
—
544
1,779
2,323
72
2002
10/15
30
Holly Pond, AL
—
119
2,056
—
—
119
2,056
2,175
83
2000
10/15
30
Jasper, AL
—
247
2,549
—
—
247
2,549
2,796
123
1983
10/15
25
Ohatchee, AL
—
119
1,938
—
—
119
1,938
2,057
78
1995
10/15
30
Scottsboro, AL
—
247
1,494
—
—
247
1,494
1,741
52
2006
10/15
35
Fyffe, AL
—
95
1,657
—
—
95
1,657
1,752
39
2001
04/16
30
Lafayette, AL
—
209
1,989
—
—
209
1,989
2,198
56
1987
04/16
25
Pinson, AL
—
228
2,453
—
—
228
2,453
2,681
58
1994
04/16
30
Jared Jewelers:
Phoenix, AZ
—
(l)
1,242
—
—
(l)
310
310
20
1998
12/01
30
Richmond, VA
—
955
1,336
—
—
955
1,336
2,291
502
1998
12/01
40
Brandon, FL
—
1,197
1,182
—
—
1,197
1,182
2,379
433
2001
05/02
40
Lithonia, GA
—
1,271
1,216
—
—
1,271
1,216
2,487
445
2001
05/02
40
Houston, TX
—
1,676
1,440
—
—
1,676
1,440
3,116
505
1999
12/02
40
Oviedo, FL
—
1,328
1,500
—
—
1,328
868
2,196
37
1998
06/13
30
Jiffi Stop:
Barry, IL
—
48
1,194
—
—
48
1,194
1,242
10
1984
10/16
25
Bowen, IL
—
39
744
—
—
39
744
783
5
1999
10/16
30
Carrollton, IL
—
48
1,319
—
—
48
1,319
1,367
11
1986
10/16
25
Griggsville, IL
—
29
801
—
—
29
801
830
7
1983
10/16
25
Jacksonville, IL
—
854
4,251
—
—
854
4,251
5,105
25
2010
10/16
35
Pittsfield, IL
—
19
581
—
—
19
581
600
5
1947
10/16
25
Pleasant Hill, IL
—
87
753
—
—
87
753
840
6
1980
10/16
25
Quincy, IL
—
183
1,539
—
—
183
1,539
1,722
11
2002
10/16
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-33
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Quincy, IL
—
596
2,056
—
—
596
2,056
2,652
14
2003
10/16
30
Quincy, IL
—
58
676
—
—
58
676
734
6
1994
10/16
25
Springfield, IL
—
231
1,625
—
—
231
1,625
1,856
11
1999
10/16
30
Springfield, IL
—
518
3,782
—
—
518
3,782
4,300
32
1995
10/16
25
Springfield, IL
—
192
2,593
—
—
192
2,593
2,785
22
1993
10/16
25
Springfield, IL
—
288
2,411
—
—
288
2,411
2,699
20
1992
10/16
25
Taylor, MO
—
39
945
—
—
39
945
984
8
1982
10/16
25
Jiffy Lube:
Auburn, MA
—
455
856
—
—
455
856
1,311
60
1988
07/14
35
Ayer, MA
—
326
792
—
—
326
792
1,118
65
1989
07/14
30
Barrington, IL
—
371
612
—
—
371
612
983
50
1986
07/14
30
Berwyn, IL
—
359
709
—
—
359
709
1,068
50
1985
07/14
35
Bolingbrook, IL
—
185
562
—
—
185
562
747
46
1986
07/14
30
Burbank, IL
—
156
418
—
—
156
418
574
51
1986
07/14
20
Plattsburgh, NY
—
127
421
—
—
127
421
548
41
1993
07/14
25
Romeoville, IL
—
158
557
—
—
158
557
715
46
1988
07/14
30
Worcester, MA
—
287
827
—
—
287
827
1,114
58
1988
07/14
35
Jin's Asian Cafe:
Sealy, TX
—
67
74
—
—
67
74
141
34
1982
03/99
40
Jo-Ann etc:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
818
896
71
—
818
967
1,785
531
1967
11/93
40
St. Peters, MO
—
1,741
5,406
1,233
—
1,741
6,639
8,380
1,759
2005
06/05
(g)
40
Johnny Carino's:
Lubbock, TX
—
1,007
1,206
—
—
1,007
1,206
2,213
453
1995
12/01
40
Just Toys Classic Cars:
Orlando, FL
—
820
2,441
125
—
820
2,566
3,386
1,395
1992
05/93
40
Kangaroo Express:
Carthage, NC
—
485
354
—
—
485
354
839
92
1989
08/06
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-34
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Sanford, NC
—
666
661
—
—
666
661
1,327
171
2000
08/06
40
Sanford, NC
—
1,638
1,371
—
—
1,638
1,371
3,009
355
2003
08/06
40
Siler City, NC
—
586
645
—
—
586
645
1,231
167
1998
08/06
40
West End, NC
—
426
516
—
—
397
516
913
134
1999
08/06
40
Belleview, FL
—
471
1,451
—
—
471
1,451
1,922
376
2006
08/06
40
Jacksonville, FL
—
683
1,362
—
—
683
1,362
2,045
353
1969
08/06
40
Jacksonville, FL
—
807
1,239
—
—
807
1,239
2,046
321
1975
08/06
40
Destin, FL
—
1,366
1,192
—
—
1,366
1,192
2,558
307
2000
09/06
40
Niceville, FL (n)
—
1,434
1,124
—
—
1,434
1,124
2,558
289
2000
09/06
40
Kill Devil Hills, NC
—
679
552
—
—
679
552
1,231
141
1990
10/06
40
Kill Devil Hills, NC
—
490
741
—
—
490
741
1,231
189
1995
10/06
40
Interlachen, FL
—
519
1,500
—
—
519
1,500
2,019
330
2007
10/06
40
Clarksville, TN
—
276
955
—
—
276
955
1,231
240
1999
12/06
40
Clarksville, TN
—
521
710
—
—
521
710
1,231
178
1999
12/06
40
Gallatin, TN
—
474
757
—
—
474
757
1,231
190
1999
12/06
40
Midland City, AL
—
729
2,538
—
—
729
2,538
3,267
637
2006
12/06
40
Naples, FL
—
3,195
1,403
—
—
2,985
1,403
4,388
352
2001
12/06
40
Columbiana, AL
—
771
989
—
—
771
989
1,760
246
1982
01/07
40
Naples, FL
—
3,162
1,597
—
—
3,162
1,597
4,759
394
1995
02/07
40
Longs, SC
—
745
758
—
—
745
758
1,503
186
2001
03/07
40
Kentwood, LA
—
985
891
—
—
985
891
1,876
218
2001
03/07
40
Dothan, AL
—
774
1,886
—
—
774
1,886
2,660
462
2007
03/07
40
Naples, FL
—
2,412
1,589
—
—
2,412
1,589
4,001
382
2000
05/07
40
Cary, NC
—
1,314
2,125
—
—
1,314
2,125
3,439
498
2007
08/07
40
Havelock, NC
—
170
681
—
—
170
681
851
56
1962
07/14
30
Statesville, NC
—
249
653
—
—
249
653
902
46
1960
07/14
35
KARM Home Store:
Knoxville, TN
—
467
735
—
—
467
735
1,202
330
1999
01/98
(f)
40
Kash n' Karry:
Seffner, FL
—
322
1,222
—
—
322
1,222
1,544
403
1983
03/99
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-35
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Keg Steakhouse:
Lynnwood, WA
—
1,256
649
—
—
1,256
649
1,905
244
1992
12/01
40
KFC:
Fenton, MO
—
307
496
—
—
307
496
803
369
1985
07/92
33
Erie, PA
—
517
496
—
—
517
496
1,013
187
1996
12/01
40
Marysville, WA
—
647
546
—
—
647
546
1,193
205
1996
12/01
40
Evansville, IN
—
370
767
—
—
370
767
1,137
204
2004
05/06
40
Hampton, VA
—
251
1,173
—
—
251
1,173
1,424
161
2001
11/12
30
Mechanicsville, VA
—
482
422
—
—
482
422
904
70
1989
11/12
25
Newport News, VA
—
461
883
—
—
461
883
1,344
121
2001
11/12
30
Newport News, VA
—
582
392
—
—
582
392
974
65
1985
11/12
25
Newport News, VA
—
572
442
—
—
572
442
1,014
73
1986
11/12
25
Richmond, VA
—
492
452
—
—
492
452
944
53
2003
11/12
35
Richmond, VA
—
552
532
—
—
552
532
1,084
88
1984
11/12
25
Richmond, VA
—
452
452
—
—
452
452
904
75
1984
11/12
25
Richmond, VA
—
532
472
—
—
532
472
1,004
78
1986
11/12
25
Richmond, VA
—
481
1,253
—
—
481
1,253
1,734
207
1990
11/12
25
Virginia Beach, VA
—
402
482
—
—
402
482
884
80
1984
11/12
25
Ahoskie, NC
—
393
1,012
—
—
393
1,012
1,405
123
1988
12/13
25
Elizabeth City, NC
—
197
1,209
—
—
197
1,209
1,406
147
1988
12/13
25
Brownsville, TX
—
334
865
—
—
334
865
1,199
102
1990
01/14
25
Brownsville, TX
—
404
374
—
—
404
374
778
32
2003
01/14
35
Copperas Cove, TX
—
256
747
—
—
256
747
1,003
74
2001
01/14
30
Del Rio, TX
—
453
246
—
—
453
246
699
24
1995
01/14
30
Eagle Pass, TX
—
226
1,071
—
—
226
1,071
1,297
127
1992
01/14
25
Edinburg, TX
—
452
1,237
—
—
452
1,237
1,689
122
1996
01/14
30
Harker Heights, TX
—
275
1,218
—
—
275
1,218
1,493
103
2008
01/14
35
Harlingen, TX
—
128
1,708
—
—
128
1,708
1,836
202
1992
01/14
25
Jacksonville, TX
—
69
562
—
—
69
562
631
67
1985
01/14
25
Killeen, TX
—
226
1,228
—
—
226
1,228
1,454
121
1993
01/14
30
Laredo, TX
—
265
1,580
—
—
265
1,580
1,845
156
1996
01/14
30
Marshall, TX
—
89
709
—
—
89
709
798
84
1985
01/14
25
McAllen, TX
—
491
1,051
—
—
491
1,051
1,542
124
1987
01/14
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-36
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Mission, TX
—
137
1,404
—
—
137
1,404
1,541
138
1993
01/14
30
Palestine, TX
—
89
484
—
—
89
484
573
57
1996
01/14
25
Pharr, TX
—
167
581
—
—
167
581
748
57
1999
01/14
30
Rio Grande City, TX
—
256
394
—
—
256
394
650
33
2004
01/14
35
S Padre Island, TX
—
856
30
—
—
856
30
886
3
1994
01/14
30
San Benito, TX
—
177
503
—
—
177
503
680
50
1994
01/14
30
Temple, TX
—
246
1,188
—
—
246
1,188
1,434
141
1985
01/14
25
Tyler, TX
—
709
30
—
—
709
30
739
3
1994
01/14
30
Waco, TX
—
276
620
—
—
276
620
896
73
1984
01/14
25
Waco, TX
—
463
246
—
—
463
246
709
24
1993
01/14
30
Weslaco, TX
—
236
1,561
—
—
236
1,561
1,797
154
1995
01/14
30
Belton, MO
—
267
744
—
—
267
744
1,011
33
1987
06/15
35
Cameron, MO
—
229
1,143
—
—
229
1,143
1,372
59
1999
06/15
30
Columbia, MO
—
343
839
—
—
343
839
1,182
43
1987
06/15
30
Excelsior Springs, MO
—
286
1,219
—
—
286
1,219
1,505
75
1988
06/15
25
Ft Pierce, FL
—
591
695
—
—
591
695
1,286
36
2004
06/15
30
Ft Pierce, FL
—
363
487
—
—
363
487
850
25
1992
06/15
30
Lake Wales, FL
—
162
1,561
—
—
162
1,561
1,723
96
1986
06/15
25
Oak Grove, MO
—
209
1,323
—
—
209
1,323
1,532
68
2003
06/15
30
Port St Lucie, FL
—
695
857
—
—
695
857
1,552
44
1998
06/15
30
Port St Lucie, FL
—
723
1,740
—
—
723
1,740
2,463
77
2006
06/15
35
Sebastian, FL
—
409
1,123
—
—
409
1,123
1,532
58
2000
06/15
30
Vero Beach, FL
—
428
1,218
—
—
428
1,218
1,646
63
2004
06/15
30
Lisle, IL
—
499
1,314
—
—
499
1,314
1,813
57
2000
09/15
30
Lockport, IL
—
499
1,085
—
—
499
1,085
1,584
47
2007
09/15
30
Sandwich, IL
—
86
1,143
—
—
86
1,143
1,229
49
1999
09/15
30
Yorkville, IL
—
413
960
—
—
413
960
1,373
50
1972
09/15
25
Kohl's:
Florence, AL
—
818
1,047
—
—
818
698
1,516
218
2006
06/04
40
Kroger:
Elkhart, IN
—
541
1,550
—
—
541
1,550
2,091
254
1979
07/14
15
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-37
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Kum & Go:
Omaha, NE
—
393
214
—
—
393
214
607
124
1979
06/05
20
Kwik Pik:
Bear Creek, PA
—
191
230
—
—
191
230
421
131
1980
08/05
20
Bradford, PA
—
184
762
—
—
184
762
946
433
1983
08/05
20
Coraopolis, PA (n)
—
476
347
—
—
476
347
823
198
1983
08/05
20
Bear Creek Township, PA (n)
—
689
275
—
—
689
275
964
155
1980
09/05
20
Beech Creek, PA
—
477
613
—
—
477
613
1,090
168
1988
01/06
40
Canisteo, NY
—
142
485
—
—
142
485
627
133
1983
01/06
40
Curwensville, PA
—
226
608
—
—
226
608
834
167
1983
01/06
40
Ellwood City, PA
—
196
526
—
—
196
526
722
144
1987
01/06
40
Hastings, PA
—
199
455
—
—
199
455
654
125
1989
01/06
40
Jersey Shore, PA
—
515
381
—
—
515
381
896
104
1960
01/06
40
Leeper, PA
—
286
644
—
—
286
644
930
176
1987
01/06
40
Lewisberry, PA
—
412
534
—
—
412
534
946
146
1988
01/06
40
Mercersburg, PA
—
672
746
—
—
672
746
1,418
204
1988
01/06
40
New Florence, PA
—
298
812
—
—
298
812
1,110
223
1989
01/06
40
Newstead, NY
—
255
835
—
—
255
835
1,090
229
1990
01/06
40
Philipsburg, PA
—
428
269
—
—
428
269
697
74
1978
01/06
40
Plainfield, PA
—
244
383
—
—
244
383
627
105
1988
01/06
40
Reynoldsville, PA
—
113
328
—
—
113
328
441
90
1983
01/06
40
Port Royal, PA
—
238
635
—
—
238
635
873
332
1989
07/06
20
LA Fitness:
Little Rock, AR
—
3,113
2,660
4,125
—
3,113
6,785
9,898
1,577
1997
09/98
40
Sarasota, FL
—
471
1,344
4,450
—
471
5,794
6,265
1,073
1983
03/99
(g)
40
Centerville, OH
—
2,700
—
8,572
—
2,700
8,572
11,272
1,616
2009
06/08
(m)
40
Warren, MI
—
2,360
—
6,674
—
2,360
6,674
9,034
1,300
2009
07/08
(m)
40
Cincinnati, OH
—
5,145
—
9,011
—
5,145
9,011
14,156
1,699
2009
08/08
(m)
40
Lawrence, IN
—
1,599
—
5,867
—
1,762
5,870
7,632
935
2010
01/10
(m)
40
Laveen, AZ
—
1,665
—
5,749
—
1,665
5,749
7,414
892
2010
02/10
(m)
40
Kennesaw, GA
—
3,653
—
3,325
—
3,653
3,325
6,978
495
2011
07/10
(m)
40
Arlington, TX
—
1,166
6,214
—
—
1,166
6,214
7,380
1,058
2007
01/11
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-38
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Hurst, TX
—
1,494
6,187
—
—
1,494
6,187
7,681
965
2008
07/11
35
South Plainfield, NJ
—
2,415
6,592
—
—
2,415
6,592
9,007
855
2006
06/12
35
McDonough, GA
—
1,503
6,727
—
—
1,503
6,727
8,230
825
2008
09/12
35
Greensburg, PA
—
1,791
7,015
—
—
1,791
7,015
8,806
709
2012
12/12
40
Indianapolis, IN
—
1,651
6,585
—
—
1,651
6,585
8,236
665
2012
12/12
40
Phoenix, AZ
—
1,601
6,540
—
—
1,601
6,540
8,141
661
2012
12/12
40
Tampa, FL
—
4,492
10,894
—
—
4,492
10,894
15,386
1,101
2012
12/12
40
West Dundee, IL
—
1,961
6,525
—
—
1,961
6,525
8,486
659
2012
12/12
40
Irving, TX
—
3,636
7,326
—
—
3,636
7,326
10,962
759
2006
05/13
35
Royal Oak, MI
—
3,238
8,998
—
—
3,238
8,998
12,236
846
2010
09/13
35
St. Louis Park, MN
—
3,436
8,665
—
—
3,436
8,665
12,101
753
2009
12/13
35
Pompano Beach, FL
—
7,009
—
9,572
—
7,009
9,572
16,581
233
2015
12/14
(m)
40
San Antonio, TX
—
2,084
—
7,814
—
2,081
7,814
9,895
73
2016
02/15
(m)
(k)
Antioch, CA
—
2,521
—
8,510
—
2,521
8,510
11,031
168
2016
06/15
(m)
40
Plymouth, MI
—
1,646
—
7,820
—
1,646
7,820
9,466
204
2015
06/15
(m)
40
Spanaway, WA
—
846
—
7,331
—
846
7,331
8,177
160
2016
07/15
(m)
40
Round Rock, TX
—
1,556
—
—
—
1,556
(e)
1,556
(e)
(e)
04/16
(m)
(m)
Roswell, GA
—
3,175
—
—
—
3,175
(e)
3,175
(e)
(e)
10/16
(m)
(m)
Cordova, TN
—
2,391
—
—
—
2,391
(e)
2,391
(e)
(e)
12/16
(m)
(m)
Lakeland, FL
—
1,856
—
—
—
1,856
(e)
1,856
(e)
(e)
12/16
(m)
(m)
LaPetite Academy:
Albuquerque, NM
—
332
1,166
—
—
332
1,166
1,498
96
1989
07/14
30
Ft. Worth, TX
—
140
383
—
—
140
383
523
63
1981
07/14
15
Moore, OK
—
119
412
—
—
119
412
531
68
1982
07/14
15
Oklahoma City, OK
—
100
391
—
—
100
391
491
64
1982
07/14
15
Last Stop West:
Azle, TX
—
648
859
—
—
648
859
1,507
205
1970
06/07
40
Legacy-GoHealth:
Portland, OR
—
191
40
—
—
197
—
197
(e)
(e)
09/06
(e)
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-39
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Life Time Fitness:
Mt. Laurel, NJ
—
3,617
39,878
—
—
3,617
39,878
43,495
712
2015
05/16
35
Framingham, MA
—
8,860
37,806
—
—
8,860
37,806
46,666
197
2016
10/16
40
Gaithersburg, MD
—
8,344
45,286
—
—
8,344
45,286
53,630
236
2016
10/16
40
Lil' Champ:
Gainesville, FL
—
900
—
1,800
—
900
1,800
2,700
441
2006
07/05
(m)
40
Jacksonville, FL
—
2,225
3,265
—
—
2,225
3,265
5,490
701
2006
08/05
40
Ocala, FL
—
846
—
1,564
—
846
1,564
2,410
373
2006
02/06
(m)
40
LoanMax:
Bridgeview, IL
—
673
744
—
—
673
744
1,417
280
1997
12/01
40
Logan's Roadhouse:
Alexandria, LA
—
1,218
3,049
—
—
1,218
3,049
4,267
772
1998
11/06
40
Beckley, WV
—
1,396
2,405
—
—
1,396
2,405
3,801
609
2006
11/06
40
Cookeville, TN
—
1,262
2,271
—
—
1,262
2,271
3,533
575
1997
11/06
40
Greenwood, IN
—
1,341
2,105
—
—
1,341
2,105
3,446
533
2000
11/06
40
Hurst, TX
—
1,858
1,916
—
—
1,858
1,916
3,774
485
1999
11/06
40
Jackson, TN
—
1,200
2,246
—
—
1,200
2,246
3,446
569
1994
11/06
40
Lake Charles, LA
—
1,285
2,202
—
—
1,285
2,202
3,487
557
1998
11/06
40
McAllen, TX
—
1,608
2,178
—
—
1,608
2,178
3,786
551
2005
11/06
40
Roanoke, VA
—
2,302
1,947
—
—
2,302
1,947
4,249
493
1998
11/06
40
San Marcos, TX
—
837
1,453
—
—
837
1,453
2,290
368
2000
11/06
40
Smyrna, TN
—
1,335
2,047
—
—
1,335
2,047
3,382
518
2002
11/06
40
Franklin, TN
—
2,519
1,705
—
—
2,519
1,705
4,224
428
1995
12/06
40
Southhaven, MS
—
1,298
1,338
—
—
1,298
1,338
2,636
336
2005
12/06
40
Columbus, MS
—
707
—
1,681
—
707
1,681
2,388
226
2011
11/10
(m)
40
Nashville, TN
—
844
—
1,592
—
844
1,592
2,436
204
2011
06/11
(m)
40
Marion, IL
—
1,016
—
1,674
—
1,016
1,674
2,690
180
2012
03/12
(m)
40
Pooler, GA
—
1,159
—
1,720
—
1,159
1,720
2,879
167
2013
03/12
(m)
40
Cullman, AL
—
889
—
1,585
—
889
1,585
2,474
167
2012
04/12
(m)
40
Lebanon, TN
—
789
—
1,725
—
789
1,725
2,514
174
2012
06/12
(m)
40
Chester, VA
—
871
—
1,697
—
871
1,697
2,568
168
2013
07/12
(m)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-40
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Gonzales, LA
—
975
—
1,696
—
975
1,696
2,671
161
2013
10/12
(m)
40
Madison, AL
—
689
—
1,657
—
689
1,657
2,346
150
2013
11/12
(m)
40
Hopkinsville, KY
—
644
—
1,788
—
644
1,788
2,432
121
2014
09/13
(m)
40
Muscle Shoals, AL
—
907
—
1,506
—
907
1,506
2,413
77
2014
06/14
(m)
40
Lowe's:
Memphis, TN
—
3,215
9,170
24
—
3,215
9,194
12,409
3,342
2001
06/02
40
Magic China Café:
Orlando, FL
—
40
111
—
—
40
111
151
36
2001
02/04
40
Magic Mountain:
Columbus, OH
—
2,076
1,906
124
—
2,076
2,030
4,106
470
1990
06/07
40
Columbus, OH
—
5,380
2,693
25
—
5,380
2,718
8,098
646
1990
06/07
40
Main Event:
Oklahoma City, OK
—
2,004
8,711
—
—
2,004
8,711
10,715
336
2014
06/15
40
San Antonio, TX
—
2,115
10,080
—
—
2,115
10,080
12,195
444
2014
06/15
35
Tulsa, OK
—
1,542
7,748
—
—
1,542
7,748
9,290
299
2015
06/15
40
Fort Worth, TX
—
2,538
—
6,623
—
2,538
6,622
9,160
145
2016
12/15
(m)
40
Louisville, KY
—
2,504
—
6,375
—
2,504
6,375
8,879
126
2016
12/15
(m)
40
Independence, MO
—
1,794
7,650
—
—
1,794
7,650
9,444
199
2015
12/15
40
Memphis, TN
—
1,263
6,825
—
—
1,263
6,825
8,088
178
2015
12/15
40
Olathe, KS
—
3,174
—
6,365
—
3,174
6,365
9,539
33
2016
02/16
(m)
(k)
West Chester, OH
—
2,767
—
6,414
—
2,767
6,414
9,181
100
2016
02/16
(m)
40
Hoffman Estates, IL
—
1,730
—
8,022
—
1,730
8,022
9,752
75
2016
06/16
(m)
40
Suwanee, GA
—
2,172
—
4,842
—
2,172
4,842
7,014
5
2016
06/16
(m)
(k)
Albuquerque, NM
—
2,531
—
6,889
—
2,531
6,889
9,420
93
2016
06/16
(m)
40
Humble, TX
—
2,669
—
—
—
2,669
(e)
2,669
(e)
(e)
10/16
(m)
Kansas City, MO
—
3,519
—
—
—
3,519
(e)
3,519
(e)
(e)
10/16
(m)
Knoxville, TN
—
3,225
—
—
—
3,225
(e)
3,225
(e)
(e)
12/16
(m)
Mariscos Morales Mexican Restaurant:
Gresham, OR
—
817
108
28
—
817
136
953
44
1993
12/01
40
Mattress Firm:
Baton Rouge, LA
—
609
914
—
—
609
914
1,523
480
1995
12/95
(m)
40
Buford, GA
—
635
1,635
465
—
635
2,100
2,735
568
2003
07/04
(g)
40
Lancaster, OH
—
600
—
793
—
600
671
1,271
80
2012
01/08
(g)
40
Plainfield, IN
—
379
—
1,267
—
379
1,267
1,646
75
2014
01/14
(m)
40
Fayetteville, AR
—
891
2,229
—
—
891
2,229
3,120
214
1998
02/14
30
Pocatello, ID
—
268
—
1,505
—
268
1,505
1,773
77
2014
09/14
(m)
40
South Jordan, UT
—
719
—
1,572
—
719
1,572
2,291
70
2015
11/14
(m)
40
Helena, MT
—
658
1,568
—
—
658
1,568
2,226
57
2015
03/15
40
Kentwood, MI
—
593
1,531
—
—
593
1,531
2,124
65
2015
04/15
40
Muncie, IN
—
288
1,537
—
—
288
1,537
1,825
75
2015
04/15
35
Sandusky, OH
—
518
1,409
—
—
518
1,409
1,927
54
2015
06/15
40
Fort Collins, CO
—
757
—
1,301
—
757
1,301
2,058
37
2015
07/15
(m)
40
Wooster, OH
—
332
1,334
—
—
332
1,334
1,666
10
2016
09/16
40
MedExpress Urgent Care:
Fairmont, WV
—
245
1,859
—
—
245
1,859
2,104
246
2011
05/12
35
Hanover, PA
—
533
1,521
—
—
533
1,521
2,054
201
2011
05/12
35
Hermitage, PA
—
445
2,108
—
—
445
2,108
2,553
279
2011
05/12
35
Latrobe, PA
—
681
1,511
—
—
681
1,511
2,192
200
2011
05/12
35
Mt. Pleasant, PA
—
593
1,482
—
—
593
1,482
2,075
196
2011
05/12
35
Pittsburgh, PA
—
227
1,936
—
—
227
1,936
2,163
298
1970
05/12
30
Martinsburg, WV
—
917
—
650
—
917
650
1,567
53
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Wheeling, WV
—
485
1,232
—
—
485
1,232
1,717
156
1989
03/13
30
Huntington, WV
—
990
—
735
—
1,017
735
1,752
59
2013
08/13
(m)
40
Anderson, IN
—
777
—
661
—
777
661
1,438
50
2013
08/13
(m)
40
Terre Haute, IN
—
144
1,616
—
—
144
1,616
1,760
182
1991
08/13
30
Benton, AR
—
376
1,125
—
—
376
1,125
1,501
41
2015
07/15
40
Connellsville, PA
—
162
1,172
—
—
162
1,172
1,334
43
2015
07/15
40
Rogers, AR
—
435
1,168
—
—
435
1,168
1,603
43
2015
07/15
40
Russellville, AR
—
247
1,098
—
—
247
1,098
1,345
46
2015
07/15
35
Hot Springs, AR
—
440
1,155
—
—
440
1,155
1,595
40
2015
08/15
40
Salina, KS
—
321
1,315
—
—
321
1,315
1,636
49
1999
09/15
35
Lehigh Acres, FL
—
459
—
2,151
—
459
2,151
2,610
75
2016
10/15
(m)
25
North Little Rock, AR
—
489
1,137
—
—
489
1,137
1,626
27
2015
01/16
40
Little Rock, AR
—
858
1,806
—
—
858
1,806
2,664
43
2016
01/16
40
Swansea, IL
—
236
1,292
—
—
236
1,292
1,528
23
1997
06/16
30
Derby, KS
—
442
—
—
—
442
(i)
442
(i)
(i)
07/16
(i)
Alton, IL
—
376
1,397
—
—
376
1,397
1,773
16
2016
07/16
40
Pine Bluff, AR
—
478
—
—
—
478
(i)
478
(i)
(i)
07/16
(i)
Collinsville, IL
—
304
—
—
—
304
(i)
304
(i)
(i)
08/16
(i)
Wichita, KS
—
482
—
—
—
482
(i)
482
(i)
(i)
08/16
(i)
Wichita, KS
—
213
—
—
—
213
(i)
213
(i)
(i)
08/16
(i)
Quakertown, PA
—
658
—
—
—
658
(i)
658
(i)
(i)
08/16
(i)
Fort Myers, FL
—
1,522
—
—
—
1,522
(i)
1,522
(i)
(i)
09/16
(i)
Grand Rapids, MI
—
435
—
—
—
435
(i)
435
(i)
(i)
10/16
(i)
Naples, FL
—
689
—
—
—
689
(i)
689
(i)
(i)
10/16
(i)
New Baltimore, MI
—
478
—
—
—
478
(i)
478
(i)
(i)
10/16
(i)
Duluth, MN
—
535
—
—
—
535
(i)
535
(i)
(i)
12/16
(i)
Merchant's Tires:
Hampton, VA
—
180
427
—
—
180
427
607
126
1986
03/05
40
Newport News, VA
—
234
259
—
—
234
259
493
76
1986
03/05
40
Norfolk, VA
—
398
508
—
—
398
508
906
150
1986
03/05
40
Rockville, MD
—
1,030
306
—
—
1,016
306
1,322
90
1974
03/05
40
Washington, DC
—
624
578
—
—
624
578
1,202
170
1983
03/05
40
Mi Pueblo Foods:
Palo Alto, CA
—
2,272
3,405
28
—
2,272
3,433
5,705
1,521
1998
12/98
(f)
40
Michaels:
Fairfax, VA
—
534
773
1,369
—
992
2,141
3,133
878
1995
12/95
40
Altamonte Springs, FL
—
1,947
3,267
1,198
—
1,947
3,370
5,317
676
1997
09/97
26
Plymouth Meeting, PA
—
2,911
2,595
—
—
2,911
2,595
5,506
1,099
1999
10/98
(g)
40
Florissant, MO
—
523
617
1,784
—
524
2,399
2,923
445
1996
04/03
(g)
40
Miller's Ale House:
Pensacola, FL
—
1,363
1,842
—
—
1,363
1,842
3,205
300
2008
04/11
35
Oviedo, FL
—
113
3,785
—
113
3,785
3,898
398
2012
10/11
40
Mimi's:
Tampa, FL
—
688
2,357
—
—
688
2,357
3,045
226
2003
02/14
30
Mister Car Wash:
Anoka, MN
—
212
214
—
—
212
214
426
139
1968
04/07
15
Brooklyn Park, MN
—
438
778
—
—
438
778
1,216
302
1985
04/07
25
Cedar Rapids, IA
—
391
816
—
—
391
816
1,207
317
1989
04/07
25
Clive, IA
—
1,141
935
—
—
1,141
935
2,076
454
1983
04/07
20
Cottage Grove, MN
—
274
485
—
—
274
485
759
188
1992
04/07
25
Des Moines, IA
—
213
476
—
—
213
476
689
231
1964
04/07
20
Des Moines, IA
—
249
596
—
—
249
596
845
193
1990
04/07
30
Eden Prairie, MN
—
865
751
—
—
865
751
1,616
365
1984
04/07
20
Edina, MN
—
894
687
—
—
894
687
1,581
333
1985
04/07
20
Houston, TX
—
5,126
1,267
—
—
5,126
1,267
6,393
351
1995
04/07
35
Houston, TX
—
1,960
1,145
—
—
1,960
1,145
3,105
444
1983
04/07
25
Houston, TX
—
2,260
1,806
—
—
2,260
1,806
4,066
701
1975
04/07
25
Houston, TX
—
1,846
1,592
—
—
1,846
1,592
3,438
618
1983
04/07
25
Houston, TX
—
1,347
1,702
—
—
1,347
1,702
3,049
551
1984
04/07
30
Houston, TX
—
3,193
1,305
—
—
3,193
1,305
4,498
362
1995
04/07
35
Houston, TX
—
796
678
—
—
796
678
1,474
263
1986
04/07
25
Houston, TX
—
288
466
—
—
288
466
754
301
1970
04/07
15
Houston, TX
—
624
1,108
—
—
624
1,108
1,732
359
1988
04/07
30
Humble, TX
—
1,204
1,517
—
—
1,204
1,517
2,721
421
1993
04/07
35
Plymouth, MN
—
827
182
—
—
827
182
1,009
176
1955
04/07
10
Roseville, MN
—
861
564
—
—
861
564
1,425
274
1963
04/07
20
Spokane, WA
—
1,253
1,146
—
—
1,253
1,146
2,399
318
1997
04/07
35
Spokane, WA
—
214
580
—
—
214
580
794
188
1990
04/07
30
St. Cloud, MN (n)
—
243
391
—
—
242
391
633
190
1986
04/07
20
Stillwater, MN
—
289
214
—
—
289
214
503
139
1971
04/07
15
Sugarland, TX
—
3,789
1,972
—
—
3,789
1,972
5,761
547
1995
04/07
35
West St Paul, MN
—
836
236
—
—
836
236
1,072
114
1972
04/07
20
Rochester, MN
—
1,055
2,327
—
—
1,055
2,327
3,382
536
2003
10/07
40
Birmingham, AL
—
2,378
2,145
—
—
2,378
2,145
4,523
652
1985
11/07
30
Clearwater, FL
—
825
765
—
—
825
765
1,590
279
1969
11/07
25
Mesquite, TX
—
1,596
2,201
—
—
1,596
2,201
3,797
803
1987
11/07
25
Seminole, FL
—
2,166
1,496
—
—
2,166
1,496
3,662
455
1985
11/07
30
Tampa, FL
—
2,993
1,669
—
—
2,993
1,669
4,662
609
1969
11/07
25
Vestavia Hills, AL
—
1,009
956
—
—
1,009
956
1,965
349
1967
11/07
25
El Paso, TX
—
664
824
—
—
664
824
1,488
186
1991
12/07
40
El Paso, TX
—
1,807
2,287
—
—
1,807
2,287
4,094
518
1983
12/07
40
El Paso, TX
—
1,424
1,306
—
—
1,424
1,306
2,730
393
1986
12/07
30
El Paso, TX
—
988
1,046
—
—
988
1,046
2,034
237
1998
12/07
40
El Paso, TX
—
1,399
1,468
—
—
1,399
1,468
2,867
332
1991
12/07
40
Tampa, FL
—
541
829
—
—
541
829
1,370
222
1978
04/10
25
Springfield, MO
—
1,064
2,109
—
—
1,064
2,109
3,173
384
1990
07/11
30
Springfield, MO
—
1,188
2,817
—
—
1,188
2,817
4,005
439
2000
07/11
35
Springfield, MO
—
642
1,767
—
—
642
1,767
2,409
321
1979
07/11
30
Missouri City, TX
—
549
1,553
—
—
549
1,553
2,102
227
2004
11/11
35
Bountiful, UT
—
484
292
—
—
484
292
776
48
1995
01/12
30
Salt Lake City, UT
—
522
1,806
—
—
522
1,806
2,328
298
1993
01/12
30
Tucson, AZ
—
946
2,566
—
—
946
2,566
3,512
424
2003
01/12
30
Tucson, AZ
—
493
345
—
—
493
345
838
49
2007
01/12
35
Tucson, AZ
—
742
2,226
—
—
742
2,226
2,968
368
2000
01/12
30
Tucson, AZ
—
108
778
—
—
108
778
886
129
2004
01/12
30
Cedar Park, TX
—
794
1,316
—
—
794
1,316
2,110
177
2009
04/12
35
Spokane Valley, WA
—
454
857
—
—
454
857
1,311
115
2005
04/12
35
Salt Lake City, UT
—
781
2,303
—
—
781
2,303
3,084
293
2009
07/12
35
College Park, GA
—
322
1,056
—
—
322
1,056
1,378
129
2008
09/12
35
Griffin, GA
—
401
2,897
—
—
401
2,897
3,298
355
2007
09/12
35
Hampton, GA
—
421
1,996
—
—
421
1,996
2,417
245
2006
09/12
35
Lilburn, GA
—
381
2,426
—
—
381
2,426
2,807
298
2007
09/12
35
Oxford, AL
—
301
3,607
—
—
301
3,607
3,908
442
2008
09/12
35
Clermont, FL
—
783
2,328
—
—
783
2,328
3,111
280
2006
10/12
35
Springfield, MO
—
474
736
—
—
474
736
1,210
104
2006
10/12
30
Abilene, TX
—
641
3,093
—
—
641
3,093
3,734
365
2006
11/12
35
Abilene, TX
—
101
426
—
—
101
426
527
50
2009
11/12
35
Lubbock, TX
—
400
3,403
—
—
400
3,403
3,803
401
2004
11/12
35
Lubbock, TX
—
411
2,534
—
—
411
2,534
2,945
348
2003
11/12
30
Lubbock, TX
—
350
2,984
—
—
350
2,984
3,334
352
2007
11/12
35
Ephrata, PA
—
241
2,797
—
—
241
2,797
3,038
452
1987
12/12
25
Lancaster, PA
—
920
7,894
—
—
920
7,894
8,814
1,064
1999
12/12
30
Sinking Spring, PA
—
1,251
4,735
—
—
1,251
4,735
5,986
638
2005
12/12
30
York, PA
—
591
4,605
—
—
591
4,605
5,196
620
1995
12/12
30
Atlanta, GA
—
1,773
4,528
—
—
1,773
4,528
6,301
523
2003
12/12
35
Atlanta, GA
—
1,633
5,378
—
—
1,633
5,378
7,011
725
1998
12/12
30
Urbandale, IA
—
485
374
—
—
485
374
859
46
1990
04/13
30
Houston, TX
—
542
1,876
—
—
542
1,876
2,418
190
2012
06/13
35
Houston, TX
—
752
1,736
—
—
752
1,736
2,488
176
2005
06/13
35
Houston, TX
—
713
964
—
—
713
964
1,677
98
2005
06/13
35
Houston, TX
—
1,573
2,315
—
—
1,573
2,315
3,888
234
2006
06/13
35
Houston, TX
—
551
2,967
—
—
551
2,967
3,518
420
1980
06/13
25
Humble, TX
—
611
3,327
—
—
611
3,327
3,938
337
2006
06/13
35
Katy, TX
—
421
2,157
—
—
421
2,157
2,578
255
2002
06/13
30
Spring, TX
—
652
2,627
—
—
652
2,627
3,279
266
2006
06/13
35
Tucson, AZ
—
654
1,357
—
—
654
1,357
2,011
149
1986
09/13
30
Rochester, MN
—
396
264
—
—
396
264
660
25
1987
02/14
30
Tucson, AZ
—
988
272
—
—
988
272
1,260
26
1987
02/14
30
Brooklyn Park, MN
—
287
394
—
—
287
394
681
15
2011
09/15
35
Lake Mary, FL
—
692
3,518
—
—
692
3,518
4,210
142
1997
10/15
30
Melbourne, FL
—
1,262
4,348
—
—
1,262
4,348
5,610
150
2009
10/15
35
Sanford, FL
—
1,322
3,887
—
—
1,322
3,887
5,209
134
2008
10/15
35
Tampa, FL
—
630
2,879
—
—
630
2,879
3,509
36
1991
08/16
30
Clermont, FL
—
1,550
2,460
—
—
1,550
2,460
4,010
20
2013
09/16
35
Lakeland, FL
—
446
3,064
—
—
446
3,064
3,510
15
1979
11/16
25
Movie Tavern Theatre:
Covington, LA
—
1,081
6,779
—
—
1,081
6,779
7,860
518
1993
09/14
30
Baton Rouge, LA
—
1,497
—
10,888
—
1,497
10,888
12,385
408
1993
11/14
(o)
40
Mr. Hero:
Parma, OH
—
36
291
—
—
36
291
327
18
1980
06/15
25
Muchas Gracias Mexican Restaurant:
Salem, OR
—
556
736
—
—
556
736
1,292
277
1996
12/01
40
Murphy Oil:
Fort Worth, TX
—
1,652
2,018
—
—
1,652
2,018
3,670
599
2000
02/05
40
National Karate Academy:
Eden Prairie, MN
—
76
211
110
—
76
321
397
114
1997
12/01
40
Natural Grocers:
Lincoln, NE
—
1,482
2,811
—
—
1,482
2,811
4,293
298
2012
04/13
35
Coeur D'Alene, ID
—
2,172
—
2,778
—
2,172
2,778
4,950
194
2014
08/13
40
Flagstaff, AZ
2,899
(j)
831
4,079
—
—
831
4,079
4,910
248
2012
11/14
35
Helena, MT
2,542
(j)
1,079
3,062
—
—
1,079
3,062
4,141
186
2012
11/14
35
Missoula, MT
2,264
(j)
929
3,222
—
—
929
3,222
4,151
196
2012
11/14
35
Sedona, AZ
2,664
(j)
1,064
3,211
—
—
1,064
3,211
4,275
195
2012
11/14
35
Steamboat Springs, CO
3,083
(j)
1,512
3,447
—
—
1,512
3,447
4,959
209
2012
11/14
35
Independence, MO
—
912
5,002
—
—
912
5,002
5,914
340
2002
12/14
30
Conifer, CO
—
1,432
—
4,912
—
1,432
4,912
6,344
148
2015
06/15
(m)
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
955
3,975
—
—
955
3,975
4,930
137
2014
10/15
35
Vancouver, WA
—
1,639
—
3,628
—
1,639
3,628
5,267
4
2016
06/16
(m)
(k)
South Jordan, UT
—
1,460
—
—
—
1,460
(e)
1,460
(e)
(e)
08/16
(m)
Nebraskaland Tire:
Park City, KS
—
214
687
—
—
214
687
901
396
1989
06/05
20
Nitlantika:
Hollywood, FL
—
383
88
37
—
234
—
234
—
1960
12/05
15
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-41
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Northern Tool:
Beaumont, TX
—
483
831
1,211
—
483
2,042
2,525
12
1992
03/99
40
Asheville, NC
—
519
2,998
—
—
519
2,998
3,517
396
2007
05/12
35
Spartanburg, SC
—
654
3,174
—
—
654
3,174
3,828
242
2007
09/14
30
Office Depot:
Gastonia, NC
—
1,554
2,367
946
—
1,554
3,313
4,867
857
2004
12/04
40
OfficeMax:
Cincinnati, OH
—
543
1,575
—
—
543
1,575
2,118
885
1994
07/94
40
Evanston, IL
—
1,868
1,758
—
—
1,868
1,758
3,626
947
1995
06/95
40
Salinas, CA
—
1,353
1,829
—
—
1,353
1,829
3,182
909
1995
02/97
40
Redding, CA
—
667
2,182
—
—
667
2,182
2,849
1,066
1997
06/97
40
Kelso, WA
—
868
—
1,806
—
868
1,806
2,674
856
1998
09/97
(g)
40
Lynchburg, VA
—
562
—
1,851
—
562
1,851
2,413
847
1998
02/98
(m)
40
Tigard, OR
—
1,540
2,247
—
—
1,540
2,247
3,787
1,018
1995
11/98
40
Griffin, GA
—
685
—
1,802
—
685
1,802
2,487
798
1999
11/98
(g)
40
Omaha, NE
—
664
1,778
—
—
664
1,778
2,442
219
1995
07/14
20
Weatherford, TX
—
548
2,436
—
—
548
2,436
2,984
186
1999
09/14
30
Old Chicago:
Garland, TX
—
895
—
1,085
—
895
1,085
1,980
15
2016
01/16
(m)
30
Orchard Supply Hardware:
Pismo Beach, CA
—
2,436
1,997
2,339
—
2,436
4,336
6,772
797
1989
12/11
(o)
25
San Jose, CA
—
6,406
2,457
3,374
—
6,406
5,831
12,237
1,064
1982
12/11
(o)
25
San Jose, CA
—
4,092
4,279
3,307
—
4,092
7,586
11,678
1,420
1982
12/11
(o)
25
Chico, CA
—
1,782
4,563
746
—
1,782
5,308
7,090
763
2002
07/12
(o)
30
Clovis, CA
—
1,226
1,426
151
—
1,226
1,577
2,803
277
1982
07/12
(o)
25
Pinole, CA
—
2,784
5,195
—
—
2,784
5,195
7,979
926
1987
07/12
(o)
25
San Jose, CA
—
3,370
2,517
—
—
3,370
2,517
5,887
449
1965
07/12
25
San Jose, CA
—
5,850
4,129
—
—
5,850
4,129
9,979
736
1946
07/12
(o)
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-42
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Orlando Metro Gymnastics:
Orlando, FL
—
428
1,345
—
—
428
1,345
1,773
402
2003
01/05
40
Outback:
Cheyenne, WY
—
672
2,502
—
—
672
2,502
3,174
400
2001
03/12
30
Conroe, TX
—
524
583
—
—
524
583
1,107
112
1992
03/12
25
Copley Township, OH
—
753
2,407
—
—
753
2,407
3,160
461
1993
03/12
25
Coraopolis, PA
—
487
2,326
—
—
487
2,326
2,813
371
1998
03/12
30
Denver, CO
—
850
1,305
—
—
850
1,305
2,155
179
2003
03/12
35
Knoxville, TN
—
753
1,852
—
—
753
1,852
2,605
254
2004
03/12
35
Largo, MD
—
1,738
2,227
—
—
1,738
2,227
3,965
356
2001
03/12
30
Lufkin, TX
—
850
1,147
—
—
850
1,147
1,997
183
1999
03/12
30
Marrero, LA
—
781
3,144
—
—
781
3,144
3,925
603
1995
03/12
25
Mechanicsville, VA
—
674
2,328
—
—
674
2,328
3,002
372
2002
03/12
30
Mt. Pleasant, SC
—
713
1,466
—
—
713
1,466
2,179
234
1999
03/12
30
Phoenix, AZ
—
821
2,284
—
—
821
2,284
3,105
365
2002
03/12
30
Shreveport, LA
—
633
3,105
—
—
633
3,105
3,738
595
1994
03/12
25
Smithfield, NC
—
772
2,345
—
—
772
2,345
3,117
321
2004
03/12
35
Stockbridge, GA
—
910
1,988
—
—
910
1,988
2,898
318
2001
03/12
30
Troy, OH
—
456
1,575
—
—
456
1,575
2,031
216
2004
03/12
35
Venice, FL
—
833
2,529
—
—
833
2,529
3,362
404
2001
03/12
30
Warrenton, VA
—
1,833
2,021
—
—
1,833
2,021
3,854
323
2001
03/12
30
Wheaton, IL
—
901
654
—
—
901
654
1,555
125
1994
03/12
25
Fultondale, AL
—
765
2,097
—
—
765
2,097
2,862
149
1998
11/14
30
Palais Royale:
Sealy, TX
—
457
504
1,769
—
462
2,273
2,735
604
1982
03/99
40
Panda Express:
Florissant, MO
—
50
59
170
—
50
228
278
42
2012
04/03
(g)
40
Panera Bread:
Lewisville, TX
—
815
—
59
—
1,151
(i)
1,151
(i)
(i)
04/01
(i)
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-43
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Patient First:
Richmond, VA
—
270
1,545
—
—
270
1,545
1,815
290
1988
05/11
30
York, PA
—
772
2,995
—
—
772
2,995
3,767
409
2011
07/11
40
Mechanicsburg, PA
—
933
3,401
—
—
933
3,401
4,334
415
2011
02/12
40
Patriot Fuels:
Vinita, OK
—
72
368
—
—
72
368
440
135
1972
07/09
20
Pawn America:
Fargo, ND
—
335
2,747
—
—
335
2,747
3,082
317
2008
12/12
35
Fridley, MN
—
1,013
4,465
—
—
1,013
4,465
5,478
602
1978
12/12
30
Sioux Falls, SD
—
207
1,490
—
—
207
1,490
1,697
201
1985
12/12
30
Mankato, MN
—
449
—
1,705
—
449
1,705
2,154
133
2013
03/13
(m)
40
PDQ:
Altamonte Springs, FL
—
553
997
—
—
553
997
1,550
521
1995
01/96
40
Pep Boys:
Chicago, IL
—
1,077
3,756
—
—
1,077
3,756
4,833
979
1993
11/07
35
Cicero, IL
—
1,341
3,760
—
—
1,341
3,760
5,101
980
1993
11/07
35
Cornwell Heights, PA
—
2,058
3,102
—
—
2,058
3,102
5,160
1,132
1972
11/07
25
East Brunswick, NJ
—
2,449
5,026
—
—
2,449
5,026
7,475
1,529
1987
11/07
30
Guayama, PR
—
1,729
2,732
—
—
1,729
2,131
3,860
459
1998
11/07
33
Jacksonville, FL
—
810
2,331
—
—
810
2,331
3,141
608
1989
11/07
35
Joliet, IL
—
1,506
3,727
—
—
1,506
3,727
5,233
972
1993
11/07
35
Lansing, IL
—
869
3,440
—
—
869
3,440
4,309
897
1993
11/07
35
Marietta, GA
—
1,311
3,556
—
—
1,311
3,556
4,867
1,082
1987
11/07
30
Marlton, NJ
—
1,608
4,142
—
—
1,608
4,142
5,750
1,260
1983
11/07
30
Philadelphia, PA
—
1,300
3,830
—
—
1,300
3,830
5,130
999
1995
11/07
35
Quakertown, PA
—
1,129
3,252
—
—
1,129
3,252
4,381
848
1995
11/07
35
Reading, PA
—
1,189
3,367
—
—
1,189
2,819
4,008
715
1989
11/07
28
Roswell, GA
—
931
2,732
—
—
931
2,732
3,663
831
2007
11/07
30
Turnersville, NJ
—
990
3,494
—
—
990
3,494
4,484
1,063
1986
11/07
30
Houston, TX
—
734
3,028
—
—
734
3,028
3,762
677
1994
04/10
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-44
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Perkins Restaurant:
Des Moines, IA
—
256
136
—
—
256
136
392
136
1976
06/05
10
Des Moines, IA
—
226
203
—
—
226
203
429
203
1976
06/05
10
Des Moines, IA
—
270
218
—
—
270
218
488
218
1977
06/05
10
Newton, IA
—
354
402
—
—
354
402
756
402
1979
06/05
10
Urbandale, IA
—
377
581
—
—
377
581
958
336
1979
06/05
20
Pet Paradise:
Houston, TX
—
417
2,306
—
—
417
2,306
2,723
507
2008
03/08
40
Bunnell, FL
—
316
881
—
—
316
881
1,197
192
1997
04/08
40
Charlotte, NC
—
825
—
3,231
—
825
3,231
4,056
602
2009
11/08
(m)
40
Davie, FL
—
1,138
1,069
—
—
1,138
1,069
2,207
246
2003
12/08
35
Petco:
Grand Forks, ND
—
307
910
—
—
307
910
1,217
433
1996
12/97
40
Florissant, MO
—
299
352
1,019
—
300
1,371
1,671
254
2012
04/03
(g)
40
Petro Express:
Belmont, NC
—
1,508
1,622
—
—
1,508
1,622
3,130
450
2001
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
1,291
1,839
—
—
1,291
1,839
3,130
595
1988
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
1,697
2,419
—
—
1,697
2,419
4,116
587
2005
04/07
40
Charlotte, NC
—
1,810
2,570
—
—
1,810
2,570
4,380
624
2004
04/07
40
Charlotte, NC
—
1,030
1,725
—
—
1,030
1,725
2,755
558
1983
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
1,458
2,047
—
—
1,458
2,047
3,505
663
1987
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
1,778
1,977
—
—
1,778
1,977
3,755
640
1992
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
507
698
—
—
507
698
1,205
339
1967
04/07
20
Charlotte, NC
—
629
876
—
—
623
876
1,499
283
1986
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
2,784
3,720
—
—
2,784
3,720
6,504
1,032
1998
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
429
425
—
—
429
425
854
138
1983
04/07
30
Charlotte, NC
—
1,532
1,973
—
—
1,532
1,973
3,505
547
1998
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
2,316
2,064
—
—
2,316
2,064
4,380
573
1996
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
2,165
1,965
—
—
2,165
1,965
4,130
545
1997
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
1,340
1,790
—
—
1,340
1,790
3,130
497
1998
04/07
35
Concord, NC
—
2,144
1,986
—
—
2,144
1,986
4,130
551
2000
04/07
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-45
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Concord, NC
—
1,828
1,677
—
—
1,707
1,677
3,384
465
2002
04/07
35
Denver, NC
—
2,317
1,750
—
—
2,317
1,750
4,067
485
1999
04/07
35
Fort Mill, SC
—
3,825
2,554
—
—
3,825
2,554
6,379
709
1998
04/07
35
Gastonia, NC
—
335
545
—
—
335
545
880
132
2000
04/07
40
Gastonia, NC
—
1,070
1,185
—
—
1,070
1,185
2,255
329
1990
04/07
35
Gastonia, NC
—
745
760
—
—
745
760
1,505
185
2003
04/07
40
Gastonia, NC
—
965
1,228
—
—
965
1,228
2,193
340
2001
04/07
35
Hickory, NC
—
1,975
1,530
—
—
1,975
1,530
3,505
424
2002
04/07
35
Kings Mountain, NC
—
1,210
982
—
—
1,210
982
2,192
272
1988
04/07
35
Lake Wylie, SC
—
1,381
2,061
—
—
1,381
2,061
3,442
572
1998
04/07
35
Lake Wylie, SC
—
1,972
1,283
—
—
1,972
1,283
3,255
356
2003
04/07
35
Lincolnton, NC
—
723
532
—
—
723
532
1,255
172
1989
04/07
30
Mineral Springs, NC
—
678
577
—
—
678
577
1,255
140
2002
04/07
40
Monroe, NC
—
857
1,023
—
—
857
1,023
1,880
248
2004
04/07
40
Monroe, NC
—
709
796
—
—
709
796
1,505
221
1999
04/07
35
Monroe, NC
—
421
834
—
—
421
834
1,255
231
1997
04/07
35
Rock Hill, SC
—
3,095
1,910
—
—
3,095
1,910
5,005
530
1999
04/07
35
Rock Hill, SC
—
2,119
1,886
—
—
2,119
1,886
4,005
523
1998
04/07
35
Rock Hill, SC
—
778
727
—
—
778
727
1,505
235
1990
04/07
30
Statesville, NC
—
1,886
2,182
—
—
1,864
2,182
4,046
605
1999
04/07
35
Waxhaw, NC
—
508
747
—
—
508
747
1,255
181
2002
04/07
40
York, SC
—
2,306
1,449
—
—
2,306
1,449
3,755
402
1999
04/07
35
Charlotte, NC
—
1,834
1,214
—
—
1,834
1,214
3,048
292
1997
05/07
40
Charlotte, NC
—
1,849
2,280
—
—
1,849
2,280
4,129
549
2005
05/07
40
Rock Hill, SC
—
3,108
2,146
—
—
3,055
2,146
5,201
516
1999
05/07
40
PetSense:
Kingsville, TX
—
499
458
224
—
499
682
1,181
207
1995
12/01
40
PetSmart:
Chicago, IL
—
2,724
3,566
—
—
2,724
3,566
6,290
1,631
1998
09/98
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-46
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Pier I Imports:
Anchorage, AK
—
928
1,663
—
—
928
1,663
2,591
866
1995
02/96
40
Memphis, TN
—
713
822
—
—
713
822
1,535
401
1997
09/96
(f)
40
Sanford, FL
—
738
803
—
—
738
803
1,541
377
1998
06/97
(f)
40
Valdosta, GA
—
391
806
—
—
391
806
1,197
345
1999
01/99
(f)
40
Pizza Hut:
Monroeville, AL
—
547
44
—
—
547
44
591
17
1976
12/01
40
Bowie, TX
—
111
346
—
—
111
346
457
26
1976
02/15
25
Greeneville, TN
—
111
717
—
—
111
717
828
54
1972
02/15
25
Pollo Tropical:
Hialeah, FL
—
170
106
—
—
170
(i)
170
(i)
(i)
09/06
(i)
Popeye's:
Snellville, GA
—
642
437
—
—
642
437
1,079
164
1995
12/01
40
Randallstown, MD
—
483
609
—
—
483
609
1,092
70
1958
02/14
25
Power Center:
Midland, MI
—
1,085
1,635
220
—
1,085
1,598
2,683
455
2005
05/05
(g)
40
Big Flats, NY
—
2,248
7,159
1,258
—
2,248
5,075
7,323
1,450
2006
08/05
(g)
40
Harlingen, TX
—
247
807
—
—
247
583
830
156
2008
09/06
(g)
40
Harlingen, TX
—
749
1,238
195
—
749
1,043
1,792
288
2008
09/06
(g)
40
Premium Spas & Billiards:
Fairfax, VA
—
105
151
413
—
194
564
758
135
1995
12/95
40
Pull-A-Part:
Augusta, GA
—
1,414
—
1,449
—
1,414
1,449
2,863
346
2007
08/06
(m)
40
Birmingham, AL
—
1,165
2,090
—
—
1,165
2,090
3,255
542
1964
08/06
40
Charlotte, NC
—
2,913
1,724
—
—
2,908
1,724
4,632
447
2006
08/06
40
Conley, GA
—
1,686
1,387
—
—
1,686
1,387
3,073
360
1999
08/06
40
Harvey, LA
—
1,887
—
4,326
—
1,887
4,326
6,213
915
2008
08/06
(m)
40
Knoxville, TN
—
961
—
2,384
—
961
2,384
3,345
564
2007
08/06
(m)
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-47
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Louisville, KY
—
3,206
1,532
—
—
3,206
1,532
4,738
397
2006
08/06
40
Nashville, TN
—
2,164
1,414
—
—
2,164
1,414
3,578
367
2006
08/06
40
Norcross, GA
—
1,831
1,040
—
—
1,831
1,040
2,871
270
1998
08/06
40
Cleveland, OH
—
4,556
—
2,096
—
4,556
2,096
6,652
478
2007
08/06
(m)
40
Lafayette, LA
—
1,036
—
2,226
—
1,036
2,226
3,262
503
2007
08/06
(m)
40
Montgomery, AL
—
934
—
2,013
—
934
2,013
2,947
459
2007
11/06
(m)
40
Jackson, MS
—
1,315
—
2,471
—
1,315
2,318
3,633
520
2008
12/06
(m)
40
Baton Rouge, LA
—
893
—
3,256
—
893
3,256
4,149
634
2009
01/07
(m)
40
Memphis, TN
—
1,779
—
2,964
—
1,779
2,964
4,743
639
2008
05/07
(m)
40
Mobile, AL
—
550
—
2,772
—
550
2,772
3,322
552
2009
06/07
(m)
40
Winston-Salem, NC
—
846
—
2,449
—
836
2,449
3,285
492
2009
08/07
(m)
40
Lithonia, GA
—
2,410
—
2,345
—
2,410
2,345
4,755
467
2009
08/07
(m)
40
Columbia, SC
—
935
—
2,178
—
935
2,178
3,113
433
2009
09/07
(m)
40
Akron, OH
—
1,065
—
1,869
—
1,065
1,869
2,934
333
2009
10/08
(m)
40
Quaker Steak & Lube:
Mentor, OH
—
841
2,452
—
—
841
2,452
3,293
190
2009
04/14
35
QuikTrip:
Alpharetta, GA
—
1,048
607
—
—
1,048
607
1,655
175
1996
06/05
40
Clive, IA
—
623
557
—
—
623
557
1,180
214
1994
06/05
30
Herculaneum, MO
—
856
1,613
—
—
856
1,613
2,469
621
1991
06/05
30
Johnston, IA
—
394
385
—
—
394
385
779
148
1991
06/05
30
Olathe, KS
—
793
1,392
—
—
793
1,392
2,185
402
1999
06/05
40
Tulsa, OK
—
1,225
650
—
—
1,225
650
1,875
250
1990
06/05
30
Urbandale, IA
—
340
764
—
—
340
764
1,104
220
1993
06/05
40
Wichita, KS
—
127
543
—
—
127
543
670
209
1990
06/05
30
Woodstock , GA
—
488
1,042
—
—
488
1,042
1,530
301
1997
06/05
40
Fountain Inn, SC
—
723
3,289
—
—
723
3,289
4,012
43
2015
07/16
35
Charlotte, NC
—
739
3,512
—
—
739
3,512
4,251
33
2016
08/16
40
Marietta, GA
—
1,870
3,795
—
—
1,870
3,795
5,665
20
2016
10/16
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-48
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Qwest Corporation Service Center:
Cedar Rapids, IA
—
184
629
143
—
184
772
956
365
1976
06/05
20
Decorah, IA
—
72
272
—
—
72
272
344
272
1974
06/05
10
Rabobank:
Chico, CA
—
346
—
—
—
346
—
346
(e)
(i)
07/12
(e)
Raising Cane's:
Lancaster, OH
—
600
—
1,075
—
600
1,075
1,675
111
2012
01/08
(g)
40
Sulphur, LA
—
326
1,268
—
—
326
1,268
1,594
207
2009
04/11
35
Hurst, TX
—
763
—
1,309
—
763
1,309
2,072
170
2011
05/11
(m)
40
Fort Worth, TX
—
792
—
1,144
—
792
1,144
1,936
149
2011
06/11
(m)
40
Plano, TX
—
1,316
—
1,349
—
1,316
1,349
2,665
176
2011
06/11
(m)
40
Pearland, TX
—
774
—
1,255
—
774
1,255
2,029
161
2011
07/11
(m)
40
Addison, TX
—
869
—
1,343
—
869
1,343
2,212
161
2012
10/11
(m)
40
Houston, TX
—
737
—
1,163
—
737
1,163
1,900
142
2012
10/11
(m)
40
Euless, TX
—
1,222
—
1,376
—
1,226
1,376
2,602
173
2011
12/11
(m)
40
Moore, OK
—
762
—
1,153
—
762
1,153
1,915
135
2012
01/12
(m)
40
Rowlett, TX
—
814
—
1,398
—
814
1,398
2,212
156
2012
02/12
(m)
40
Keller, TX
—
833
—
1,265
—
833
1,265
2,098
133
2012
06/12
(m)
40
Omaha, NE
—
1,181
—
1,676
—
1,181
1,676
2,857
166
2013
08/12
(m)
40
McKinney, TX
—
1,443
—
1,255
—
1,443
1,255
2,698
116
2013
11/12
(m)
40
Tulsa, OK
—
1,006
—
1,508
—
1,006
1,508
2,514
140
2013
12/12
(m)
40
Broken Arrow, OK
—
1,267
1,285
—
—
1,267
1,285
2,552
108
2013
04/13
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
1,217
—
1,312
—
1,217
1,312
2,529
100
2013
06/13
(m)
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
988
—
1,268
—
988
1,268
2,256
102
2013
06/13
(m)
40
Owasso, OK
—
641
—
1,313
—
641
1,313
1,954
97
2014
09/13
(m)
40
Longview, TX
—
1,020
—
1,488
—
1,020
1,488
2,508
91
2014
02/14
(m)
40
Georgetown, TX
—
1,101
—
1,830
—
1,101
1,830
2,931
105
2014
05/14
(m)
40
Rallys:
Toledo, OH
—
126
320
—
—
126
320
446
202
1989
07/92
39
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-49
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
RBC Bank:
Altamonte Springs, FL
—
1,316
2,014
—
—
1,316
2,014
3,330
381
2007
05/10
35
Regal Theatre:
Bolingbrook, IL
—
2,937
3,032
1,500
—
2,937
4,532
7,469
1,084
1994
09/07
30
Rent-A-Center:
Cohoes, NY
—
64
348
242
—
64
590
654
122
1994
09/04
40
Rite Aid:
Douglasville, GA
—
413
995
—
—
413
995
1,408
521
1996
01/96
40
Conyers, GA
—
575
999
—
—
575
999
1,574
488
1997
06/97
40
Riverdale, GA
—
1,089
1,707
—
—
1,089
1,707
2,796
813
1997
12/97
40
Warner Robins, GA
—
707
—
1,227
—
707
1,227
1,934
551
1999
03/98
(g)
40
Mobile, AL (n)
—
1,137
1,694
—
—
1,137
1,694
2,831
637
2000
12/01
40
Orange Beach, AL
—
1,410
1,996
—
—
1,410
1,996
3,406
751
2000
12/01
40
Norfolk, VA
—
2,742
1,797
—
—
2,742
1,797
4,539
668
2001
02/02
40
Thorndale, PA
—
2,261
2,472
—
—
2,261
2,472
4,733
919
2001
02/02
40
West Mifflin, PA
—
1,402
2,044
—
—
1,402
2,044
3,446
760
1999
02/02
40
Albany, NY
—
25
867
—
—
25
867
892
267
1994
09/04
40
Saratoga Springs, NY
—
762
591
1,560
—
2,319
621
2,940
187
1993
09/04
(o)
40
Clinton Twp, MI
—
977
1,664
—
—
977
1,664
2,641
155
1998
03/14
30
Dowagiac, MI
—
409
1,609
—
—
409
1,609
2,018
150
1998
03/14
30
Durham, NC
—
1,553
2,621
—
—
1,553
2,621
4,174
113
1999
09/15
30
Rite Care Pharmacy:
Dallas, TX
—
2,407
2,299
320
—
2,407
2,618
5,025
689
1971
06/05
40
RNR Wheels / RNR Tire Express:
Anderson, SC (n)
—
140
815
—
—
140
815
955
57
1996
07/14
35
Road Ranger:
Springfield, IL
—
705
1,500
—
—
705
1,500
2,205
395
1997
06/06
40
Belvidere, IL
—
1,098
1,256
1,257
—
1,098
2,513
3,611
507
1997
06/06
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-50
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Brazil, IN
—
2,199
907
—
—
2,199
907
3,106
239
1990
06/06
40
Cherry Valley, IL
—
1,409
1,897
—
—
1,409
1,897
3,306
500
1991
06/06
40
Cottage Grove, WI
—
2,175
1,733
—
—
2,175
1,733
3,908
457
1990
06/06
40
Decatur, IL
—
815
1,314
—
—
815
1,314
2,129
346
2002
06/06
40
Dekalb, IL
—
747
1,658
—
—
747
1,658
2,405
437
2000
06/06
40
Elk Run Heights, IA
—
1,538
2,470
—
—
1,538
2,470
4,008
651
1989
06/06
40
Lake Station, IN
—
3,172
1,112
—
—
3,172
1,112
4,284
293
1987
06/06
40
Mendota, IL
—
1,218
3,295
—
—
1,218
3,295
4,513
642
1996
06/06
40
Oakdale, WI
—
1,844
1,663
—
—
1,844
1,663
3,507
438
1998
06/06
40
Rockford, IL
—
623
1,331
7
—
596
803
1,399
212
2000
06/06
40
Rockford, IL
—
1,094
1,662
—
—
1,093
1,662
2,755
438
1996
06/06
40
Springfield, IL
—
1,795
1,863
—
—
2,211
1,863
4,074
572
1978
06/06
40
Champaign, IL
—
3,241
2,008
—
—
3,241
2,008
5,249
496
2006
02/07
40
DeKalb, IL
—
505
1,503
—
—
505
1,503
2,008
371
2004
02/07
40
Fenton, MO
—
2,584
2,622
—
—
2,584
2,622
5,206
647
2007
02/07
40
Hampshire, IL
—
1,307
1,501
1,629
—
1,307
3,130
4,437
746
1988
02/07
(f)
40
Princeton, IL (n)
—
1,141
3,066
—
—
1,141
3,066
4,207
757
2003
02/07
40
South Beloit, IL
—
3,824
2,309
—
—
3,824
2,309
6,133
570
2002
02/07
40
Cedar Rapids, IA
—
1,025
984
—
—
1,025
984
2,009
241
1990
03/07
40
Marion, IA
—
737
1,071
—
—
737
1,071
1,808
262
1974
03/07
40
Okawville, IL
—
1,530
1,147
1,034
—
1,536
2,181
3,717
392
1997
08/07
40
Dubuque, IA
—
561
1,941
—
—
561
1,941
2,502
451
2000
09/07
40
Belvidere, IL
—
521
1,053
—
—
521
1,053
1,574
240
2008
09/07
(f)
40
South Beloit, IL
—
1,182
1,324
—
—
1,182
1,324
2,506
302
2008
09/07
(f)
40
Chicago, IL
—
1,350
6,450
—
—
1,350
6,450
7,800
1,150
1970
07/12
25
Bensenville, IL
—
842
3,164
—
—
842
3,164
4,006
189
2002
03/15
30
Loves Park, IL
—
911
2,283
—
—
911
2,283
3,194
117
2010
03/15
35
Robbins Diamonds:
Newark, DE
—
636
1,273
38
—
629
1,311
1,940
707
1994
12/94
40
Ross Dress for Less:
Coral Gables, FL
—
1,782
1,661
19
—
1,782
1,680
3,462
821
1994
06/96
38
Lodi, CA
—
614
1,415
—
—
614
1,415
2,029
467
1984
03/99
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-51
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Ruby's Place:
Swansea, IL
—
46
133
87
—
46
220
266
33
1997
12/01
(g)
40
Rue 21:
Lapeer, MI
—
126
645
—
—
126
629
755
148
2007
10/05
40
Sally Beauty Supply:
Lapeer, MI
—
33
167
—
—
33
163
196
38
2007
10/05
40
Salons by JC:
Buford, GA
—
539
1,421
373
—
539
1,798
2,337
456
2003
07/04
(g)
40
Saltgrass Steakhouse:
Beaumont, TX
—
558
—
2,336
—
901
1,819
2,720
286
1975
09/10
(m)
30
San Antonio, TX
—
1,280
—
853
—
1,280
853
2,133
109
2011
08/11
(m)
40
Cypress, TX
—
1,071
—
1,886
—
1,071
1,886
2,957
210
2012
03/12
(m)
40
Midland, TX
—
837
2,073
—
—
837
2,073
2,910
210
1998
01/13
35
Port Arthur, TX
—
890
—
2,049
—
890
2,049
2,939
152
2014
08/13
(m)
40
McAllen, TX
—
1,390
—
1,148
—
1,393
1,146
2,539
86
2007
12/13
(m)
35
College Station, TX
—
934
—
2,076
—
934
2,076
3,010
119
2014
04/14
(m)
40
Lewisville, TX
—
1,268
—
2,456
—
1,268
2,456
3,724
67
2015
11/14
(m)
40
Waco, TX
—
730
—
2,321
—
730
2,321
3,051
75
2015
12/14
(m)
40
Odessa, TX
—
1,000
—
2,410
—
1,000
2,410
3,410
63
2015
01/15
(m)
40
Lubbock, TX
—
1,025
—
2,251
—
1,025
2,251
3,276
40
2016
10/15
(m)
40
Baytown, TX
—
1,208
—
—
—
1,208
(e)
1,208
(e)
(e)
07/16
(m)
(e)
Corpus Christi, TX
—
1,008
—
2,732
—
1,008
2,732
3,740
3
2016
09/16
(m)
(k)
Tyler, TX
—
1,622
—
—
—
1,622
(e)
1,622
(e)
(e)
10/16
(m)
(e)
Save on Gas and C-Store:
Wilkes-Barre, PA
—
876
1,957
—
—
876
1,957
2,833
1,113
1998
08/05
20
Hughesville, PA
—
290
566
—
—
290
258
548
149
1977
01/06
40
Savers Thrift Superstore:
Fairview Heights, IL
—
1,258
2,623
246
—
1,258
2,869
4,127
761
1980
10/05
(g)
40
North Olmsted, OH
—
1,613
4,549
—
—
1,613
4,549
6,162
38
1983
08/16
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-52
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Schlotzsky's Deli:
Phoenix, AZ
—
706
315
—
—
706
315
1,021
119
1995
12/01
40
Scottsdale, AZ
—
717
311
—
—
686
311
997
117
1995
12/01
40
Season's 52:
Schaumburg, IL
—
2,065
1,311
—
—
2,065
(i)
2,065
(i)
(i)
12/01
(i)
Select Comfort:
Tucson, AZ
—
906
—
1,271
—
906
1,271
2,177
60
2015
11/14
(m)
40
Billings, MT
—
708
—
836
—
708
836
1,544
1
2016
08/16
(m)
(k)
Shek's Chinese Express:
Eden Prairie, MN
—
65
261
—
—
65
261
326
96
1997
12/01
40
Shell:
Glendale, AZ
—
1,817
2,415
126
—
1,817
2,541
4,358
639
2001
05/08
40
Peoria, AZ
—
860
1,117
114
—
860
1,231
2,091
429
1987
05/08
30
Shop-a-Snak:
Bessemer, AL
—
564
742
—
—
564
742
1,306
197
2002
05/06
40
Chelsea, AL
—
391
628
—
—
391
628
1,019
167
1981
05/06
40
Jasper, AL (n)
—
551
747
—
—
551
747
1,298
199
1998
05/06
40
Birmingham, AL
—
439
704
—
—
439
704
1,143
187
1989
05/06
40
Birmingham, AL
—
446
672
—
—
446
672
1,118
178
1989
05/06
40
Birmingham, AL
—
361
744
—
—
361
744
1,105
198
1989
05/06
40
Homewood, AL
—
468
657
—
—
468
657
1,125
175
1990
05/06
40
Hoover, AL
—
490
769
—
—
444
769
1,213
204
1992
05/06
40
Hoover, AL
—
713
865
—
—
713
865
1,578
230
1998
05/06
40
Hoover, AL
—
764
1,157
—
—
663
1,157
1,820
307
2005
05/06
40
Trussville, AL
—
272
542
—
—
272
542
814
144
1992
05/06
40
Tuscaloosa, AL
—
525
463
—
—
525
463
988
123
1991
05/06
40
Tuscaloosa, AL
—
432
559
—
—
432
559
991
149
1991
05/06
40
Tuscaloosa, AL
—
386
733
—
—
386
733
1,119
195
1991
05/06
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-53
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Shopko:
Riverdale, UT
—
2,294
5,396
—
—
2,294
5,396
7,690
405
1991
02/15
25
Spanish Fork, UT
—
1,526
4,458
—
—
1,526
4,458
5,984
334
1991
02/15
25
Spokane, WA
—
2,270
7,975
—
—
2,270
7,975
10,245
598
1986
02/15
25
West Bend, WI
—
1,435
7,654
—
—
1,435
7,654
9,089
574
1987
02/15
25
Sleepy's:
Bay Shore, NY
—
674
1,907
—
—
674
1,907
2,581
35
1985
07/16
25
Bridgehampton, NY
—
1,819
2,283
—
—
1,819
2,283
4,102
35
2003
07/16
30
Dickson City, PA
—
509
3,563
—
—
509
3,563
4,072
54
1998
07/16
30
Farmingdale, NY
—
522
2,021
—
—
522
2,021
2,543
37
1999
07/16
25
Hasbrouck Heights, NJ
—
609
989
—
—
609
989
1,598
18
1965
07/16
25
Huntington Station, NY
—
437
1,766
—
—
437
1,766
2,203
32
1990
07/16
25
Ledgewood, NJ
—
456
1,312
—
—
456
1,312
1,768
24
1981
07/16
25
Middletown, NY
—
351
3,232
—
—
351
3,232
3,583
59
1977
07/16
25
Montgomeryville, PA
—
283
3,084
—
—
283
3,084
3,367
57
1988
07/16
25
Old Saybrook, CT
—
691
3,595
—
—
691
3,595
4,286
82
1929
07/16
20
Rockville Centre, NY
—
732
951
—
—
732
951
1,683
22
1925
07/16
20
Somers Point, NJ
—
313
1,691
—
—
313
1,691
2,004
26
2004
07/16
30
Watchung, NJ
—
587
2,662
—
—
587
2,662
3,249
49
1981
07/16
25
Waterford, CT
—
615
2,736
—
—
615
2,736
3,351
50
1976
07/16
25
Whitehall, PA
—
218
1,177
—
—
218
1,177
1,395
18
2002
07/16
30
Sonic Automotive:
Charlotte, NC
—
3,619
4,854
—
—
3,619
4,854
8,473
1,168
1996
05/07
40
Sparkling Image:
Bakersfield, CA
—
2,564
4,465
2,178
—
2,564
6,643
9,207
1,788
1988
03/08
30
Bakersfield, CA
—
3,346
6,016
—
—
3,346
6,016
9,362
1,508
1998
03/08
35
Bakersfield, CA
—
2,798
5,260
22
—
1,781
284
2,065
267
1997
03/08
35
Bakersfield, CA
—
3,664
3,709
11
—
3,664
3,721
7,385
934
1994
03/08
35
Bakersfield, CA
—
2,043
3,520
40
—
2,043
719
2,762
324
1988
03/08
30
Bakersfield, CA
—
3,363
3,288
—
—
3,363
3,288
6,651
723
2002
03/08
40
San Fernando, CA
—
6,630
2,706
47
—
6,630
2,753
9,383
809
1988
03/08
30
Ventura, CA
—
5,590
4,431
94
—
5,590
4,526
10,116
991
2001
03/08
40
Ventura, CA
—
6,253
4,560
207
—
6,253
4,767
11,020
1,187
1994
03/08
35
Spec's Liquor and Fine Foods:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
768
841
601
—
768
1,442
2,210
654
1967
11/93
40
Coffee City, TX
—
1,330
3,858
—
—
1,330
3,858
5,188
1,145
1996
02/05
40
Speedy Cash:
Knoxville, TN
—
324
779
3
—
324
783
1,107
38
2014
04/15
35
Chicago, IL
—
317
859
—
—
317
859
1,176
19
2014
03/16
35
Spencer’s Air Conditioning & Appliance:
Glendale, AZ
—
342
982
—
—
342
982
1,324
428
1999
12/98
(g)
40
Sprint PCS:
Lewisville, TX
—
555
—
1,172
—
598
1,128
1,726
25
2016
12/01
(m)
40
Stanton Optical:
Portland, OR
—
290
61
—
—
300
—
300
(e)
(e)
09/06
(e)
Staples:
Memphis, TN
—
931
2,210
—
—
931
2,210
3,141
182
2011
02/14
35
Starplex Theatre:
Southington, CT
—
1,346
—
4,263
—
1,346
4,263
5,609
361
1993
05/14
(o)
30
Steak N Shake:
Munhall, PA
—
688
727
—
—
688
727
1,415
72
2002
07/14
25
South Bend, IN
—
447
1,238
—
—
447
1,238
1,685
101
2004
07/14
30
Sterling Collision:
Lombard, IL
—
622
1,714
—
—
622
1,714
2,336
277
1997
12/12
25
Stone Mountain Chevrolet:
Lilburn, GA
—
3,027
4,685
—
—
3,027
4,685
7,712
1,449
2004
08/04
40
Stop N Go:
Grand Prairie, TX
—
421
685
—
—
421
685
1,106
257
1986
12/01
40
Stripes:
Laredo, TX
—
841
739
—
—
841
739
1,580
204
2001
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
2,033
1,288
—
—
2,033
1,288
3,321
355
1995
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
2,417
1,828
—
—
2,417
1,828
4,245
505
2000
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,279
1,015
—
—
1,279
1,015
2,294
280
1990
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
2,915
1,800
—
—
2,915
1,800
4,715
497
2000
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,843
1,419
—
—
1,843
1,419
3,262
392
2000
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
933
699
—
—
933
699
1,632
193
1999
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
2,530
1,125
—
—
2,530
1,125
3,655
311
1990
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,182
1,105
—
—
1,182
1,105
2,287
305
2000
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,039
1,145
—
—
1,039
1,145
2,184
316
2004
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,392
1,444
—
—
1,392
1,444
2,836
399
2005
12/05
40
Brownsville, TX
—
1,015
1,308
—
—
1,015
1,308
2,323
361
2003
12/05
40
Corpus Christi, TX
—
1,385
1,419
—
—
1,385
1,419
2,804
392
1982
12/05
40
Corpus Christi, TX
—
1,400
1,531
—
—
1,400
1,531
2,931
423
1984
12/05
40
Corpus Christi, TX
—
1,308
2,151
—
—
1,308
2,151
3,459
594
1995
12/05
40
Corpus Christi, TX
—
703
1,037
—
—
703
1,037
1,740
286
1986
12/05
40
Corpus Christi, TX
—
853
1,416
—
—
853
1,416
2,269
391
2005
12/05
40
Donna, TX
—
1,004
1,127
—
—
1,004
1,127
2,131
311
1995
12/05
40
Edinburg, TX
—
1,317
1,624
—
—
1,317
1,624
2,941
448
1999
12/05
40
Edinburg, TX
—
970
1,286
—
—
970
1,286
2,256
355
2003
12/05
40
Falfurias, TX
—
4,244
4,458
—
—
4,213
4,458
8,671
1,231
2002
12/05
40
Freer, TX
—
1,151
1,158
—
—
1,151
1,158
2,309
320
1984
12/05
40
George West, TX
—
1,243
695
—
—
1,243
695
1,938
192
1996
12/05
40
Harlingen, TX
—
906
953
—
—
906
953
1,859
263
1991
12/05
40
Harlingen, TX
—
755
601
—
—
755
601
1,356
166
1987
12/05
40
Harlingen, TX
—
754
1,152
—
—
754
1,152
1,906
318
1999
12/05
40
La Feria, TX
—
900
1,347
—
—
900
1,347
2,247
372
1988
12/05
40
Laredo, TX
—
1,495
1,400
—
—
1,495
1,400
2,895
387
1993
12/05
40
Laredo, TX
—
675
533
—
—
675
533
1,208
147
1993
12/05
40
Laredo, TX
—
1,553
1,775
—
—
1,553
1,775
3,328
490
2000
12/05
40
Laredo, TX
—
459
460
—
—
459
460
919
127
1983
12/05
40
Laredo, TX
—
736
670
—
—
736
670
1,406
185
1984
12/05
40
Lawton, OK
—
697
964
—
—
649
964
1,613
266
1984
12/05
40
Los Indios, TX
—
1,387
1,457
—
—
1,387
1,457
2,844
402
2005
12/05
40
McAllen, TX
—
987
893
—
—
987
893
1,880
247
1999
12/05
40
McAllen, TX
—
975
1,030
—
—
975
1,030
2,005
284
2003
12/05
40
Mission, TX
—
880
1,101
—
—
880
1,101
1,981
304
1999
12/05
40
Mission, TX
—
1,125
1,213
—
—
1,125
1,213
2,338
335
2003
12/05
40
Olmito, TX
—
3,688
2,880
—
—
3,688
2,880
6,568
795
2002
12/05
40
Pharr, TX
—
2,426
1,881
—
—
2,426
1,881
4,307
519
2003
12/05
40
Pharr, TX
—
982
1,178
—
—
982
1,178
2,160
325
1988
12/05
40
Pharr, TX
—
784
805
—
—
784
805
1,589
222
2000
12/05
40
Port Isabel, TX
—
2,062
1,299
—
—
2,062
1,299
3,361
358
1994
12/05
40
Portland, TX
—
656
915
—
—
656
915
1,571
252
1983
12/05
40
Progreso, TX
—
1,769
1,811
—
—
1,769
1,811
3,580
500
1999
12/05
40
Riviera, TX
—
2,351
2,158
—
—
2,351
2,158
4,509
596
2005
12/05
40
San Benito, TX
—
791
1,857
—
—
791
1,857
2,648
513
1994
12/05
40
San Benito, TX
—
1,103
1,586
—
—
1,103
1,586
2,689
438
2005
12/05
40
San Juan, TX
—
1,424
1,546
—
—
1,424
1,546
2,970
427
2004
12/05
40
San Juan, TX
—
1,124
1,172
—
—
1,124
1,172
2,296
323
1996
12/05
40
South Padre Island, TX
—
1,367
1,389
—
—
1,367
1,389
2,756
383
1988
12/05
40
Wichita Falls, TX
—
484
828
—
—
484
828
1,312
229
1983
12/05
40
Wichita Falls, TX
—
905
1,351
—
—
905
1,351
2,256
373
2000
12/05
40
Wichita Falls, TX
—
440
751
—
—
440
751
1,191
207
1984
12/05
40
Palmview, TX
—
835
1,372
—
—
835
1,372
2,207
350
2005
10/06
40
Harlingen, TX
—
638
1,807
—
—
638
1,807
2,445
454
2006
12/06
40
Rio Grande City, TX
—
1,871
1,612
—
—
1,871
1,612
3,483
405
2006
12/06
40
San Juan, TX
—
816
1,434
—
—
816
1,434
2,250
360
2006
12/06
40
Zapata, TX
—
1,333
1,773
—
—
1,333
1,773
3,106
445
2006
12/06
40
Orange Grove, TX
—
1,767
1,838
—
—
1,767
1,838
3,605
446
2007
04/07
40
Harlingen, TX
—
408
826
—
—
408
826
1,234
251
1982
11/07
30
Laredo, TX
—
468
728
—
—
468
728
1,196
221
1973
11/07
30
Laredo, TX
—
448
734
—
—
448
734
1,182
223
1981
11/07
30
Laredo, TX
—
698
1,169
—
—
698
1,169
1,867
355
1981
11/07
30
Laredo, TX
—
584
958
—
—
584
958
1,542
292
1981
11/07
30
Laredo, TX
—
348
1,168
—
—
348
1,168
1,516
355
1983
11/07
30
San Benito, TX
—
420
1,135
—
—
420
1,135
1,555
345
1985
11/07
30
Del Rio, TX
—
1,565
758
—
—
1,565
758
2,323
173
1996
11/07
40
Kerrville, TX
—
640
1,616
—
—
640
1,616
2,256
369
1996
11/07
40
Monahans, TX
—
2,628
2,973
—
—
2,628
2,973
5,601
678
1996
11/07
40
Odessa, TX
—
2,633
3,199
—
—
2,633
3,199
5,832
730
2006
11/07
40
San Angelo, TX
—
194
471
—
—
194
471
665
108
1998
11/07
40
Pharr, TX
—
573
1,229
—
—
573
1,229
1,802
278
2000
12/07
40
Harlingen, TX
—
329
935
—
—
329
935
1,264
279
1980
01/08
30
Harlingen, TX
—
277
808
—
—
277
808
1,085
241
1983
01/08
30
Laredo, TX
—
325
816
—
—
325
816
1,141
244
1983
01/08
30
McAllen, TX
—
643
1,776
—
—
643
1,776
2,419
530
1980
01/08
30
Port Isabel, TX
—
299
855
—
—
299
855
1,154
255
1983
01/08
30
Brownsville, TX
—
843
1,429
—
—
843
1,429
2,272
308
2007
05/08
40
Edinburg, TX
—
834
1,787
—
—
834
1,787
2,621
385
2007
05/08
40
La Villa, TX
—
710
2,166
—
—
710
2,166
2,876
467
2007
05/08
40
Laredo, TX
—
879
1,593
—
—
879
1,593
2,472
344
2007
05/08
40
Laredo, TX
—
1,183
1,934
—
—
1,183
1,934
3,117
417
2007
05/08
40
McAllen, TX
—
1,270
2,383
—
—
1,270
2,383
3,653
685
1986
05/08
30
Houston, TX (n)
—
696
1,458
—
—
696
1,458
2,154
293
2008
12/08
40
Lubbock, TX
—
671
1,612
—
—
671
1,612
2,283
324
2007
12/08
40
Subway:
Eden Prairie, MN
—
54
150
67
—
54
218
272
80
1997
12/01
40
Albany, NY
—
3
67
—
—
3
67
70
20
1992
09/04
40
Cohoes, NY
—
21
116
8
—
21
123
144
41
1994
09/04
40
Sullivan's Steakhouse:
Lincolnshire, IL
—
862
1,574
—
—
862
1,574
2,436
312
1999
01/12
25
Sunbelt Rentals:
Dayton, OH
—
391
1,223
—
—
391
1,223
1,614
165
2008
04/12
35
Shepherdsville, KY
—
516
1,577
—
—
516
1,577
2,093
212
2009
04/12
35
Sunoco:
Arnold, MD
—
417
581
—
—
417
581
998
72
1993
04/13
30
Baltimore, MD
—
542
2,054
—
—
542
2,054
2,596
254
1998
04/13
30
Baltimore, MD
—
523
2,809
—
—
523
2,809
3,332
417
1982
04/13
25
Baltimore, MD
—
271
1,482
—
—
271
1,482
1,753
220
1968
04/13
25
Baltimore, MD
—
368
1,647
—
—
368
1,647
2,015
204
1996
04/13
30
Baltimore, MD
—
455
2,122
—
—
455
2,122
2,577
315
1980
04/13
25
Baltimore, MD
—
310
1,686
—
—
310
1,686
1,996
179
2004
04/13
35
Baltimore, MD
—
620
1,279
—
—
620
1,279
1,899
158
1989
04/13
30
Bel Air, MD
—
1,376
620
—
—
1,376
620
1,996
77
1994
04/13
30
Bethesda, MD
—
1,414
1,347
—
—
1,414
1,347
2,761
200
1971
04/13
25
Centreville, VA
—
1,753
697
—
—
1,753
697
2,450
86
1994
04/13
30
Chantilly, VA
—
1,472
1,831
—
—
1,472
1,831
3,303
272
1966
04/13
25
Dale City, VA
—
639
2,461
—
—
639
2,461
3,100
304
1992
04/13
30
Dumfries, VA
—
387
2,364
—
—
387
2,364
2,751
292
1999
04/13
30
Edgewood, MD
—
823
2,073
—
—
823
2,073
2,896
308
1985
04/13
25
Frederick, MD
—
940
1,860
—
—
940
1,860
2,800
230
1996
04/13
30
Gaithersburg, MD
—
1,027
2,073
—
—
1,027
2,073
3,100
308
1982
04/13
25
Glen Burnie, MD
—
804
1,647
—
—
804
1,647
2,451
204
1994
04/13
30
Herndon, VA
—
707
1,792
—
—
707
1,792
2,499
222
1989
04/13
30
Joppa, MD
—
862
174
—
—
862
174
1,036
26
1987
04/13
25
Manassas, VA
—
1,230
1,521
—
—
1,230
1,521
2,751
188
1991
04/13
30
Manassas, VA
—
746
1,434
—
—
746
1,434
2,180
177
1993
04/13
30
Odenton, MD
—
668
2,780
—
—
668
2,780
3,448
344
2000
04/13
30
Owings Mills, MD
—
1,337
911
—
—
1,337
911
2,248
113
1994
04/13
30
Parkton, MD
—
397
2,151
—
—
397
2,151
2,548
266
1993
04/13
30
Pasadena, MD
—
591
2,509
—
—
579
2,509
3,088
310
1997
04/13
30
Pasadena, MD
—
407
1,492
—
—
407
1,492
1,899
184
1989
04/13
30
Perryville, MD
—
601
3,778
—
—
601
3,778
4,379
467
1990
04/13
30
Randallstown, MD
—
746
1,715
—
—
746
1,715
2,461
212
1995
04/13
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-54
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Reisterstown, MD
—
649
2,354
—
—
649
2,354
3,003
291
1995
04/13
30
Rockville, MD
—
1,996
2,054
—
—
1,996
2,054
4,050
305
1971
04/13
25
Severn, MD
—
765
3,139
—
—
765
3,139
3,904
388
1987
04/13
30
Sterling, VA
—
1,356
1,095
—
—
1,356
1,095
2,451
135
1997
04/13
30
Sterling, VA
—
1,540
2,461
—
—
1,540
2,461
4,001
304
1998
04/13
30
Timonium, MD
—
1,356
1,598
—
—
1,356
1,598
2,954
237
1981
04/13
25
Towson, MD
—
630
2,771
—
—
630
2,771
3,401
411
1988
04/13
25
Warrenton, VA
—
1,802
2,703
—
—
1,802
2,703
4,505
334
1994
04/13
30
Woodbridge, VA
—
678
2,664
—
—
678
2,664
3,342
395
1988
04/13
25
Sunshine Energy:
Kansas City, MO
—
517
720
—
—
517
720
1,237
215
1993
07/09
25
SunTrust:
Albany, GA
—
287
890
—
—
287
890
1,177
210
1990
06/13
15
Alexandria, VA
—
2,735
732
—
—
2,735
732
3,467
173
1969
06/13
15
Alpharetta, GA
—
1,056
1,425
—
—
1,056
1,425
2,481
168
2005
06/13
30
Alpharetta, GA
—
1,625
1,366
—
—
1,625
1,366
2,991
242
1991
06/13
20
Arlington, VA
—
1,998
638
—
—
1,998
638
2,636
113
1993
06/13
20
Atlanta, GA
—
296
748
—
—
296
748
1,044
177
1964
06/13
15
Atlanta, GA
—
2,130
1,623
—
—
2,130
1,623
3,753
287
1976
06/13
20
Augusta, GA
—
472
443
—
—
472
443
915
314
1970
06/13
5
Augusta, GA
—
352
397
—
—
352
397
749
281
1949
06/13
5
Augusta, GA
—
865
872
—
—
865
872
1,737
309
1972
06/13
10
Avon Park, FL
—
360
1,564
—
—
360
1,564
1,924
185
1983
06/13
30
Bartow, FL
—
218
769
—
—
218
769
987
109
1980
06/13
25
Beaverdam, VA
—
230
309
—
—
230
309
539
219
1964
06/13
5
Belleview, FL
—
226
1,085
—
—
226
1,085
1,311
128
1979
06/13
30
Beverly Hills, FL
—
376
1,414
—
—
376
1,414
1,790
167
1989
06/13
30
Black Mountain, NC
—
780
655
—
—
780
655
1,435
464
1943
06/13
5
Bladensburg, MD
—
1,528
1,538
—
—
1,528
1,538
3,066
182
1946
06/13
30
Bradenton, FL
—
437
1,251
—
—
429
1,251
1,680
148
1980
06/13
30
Brunswick, GA
—
158
2,169
—
—
158
2,169
2,327
1,536
1957
06/13
5
Butner, NC
—
344
606
—
—
344
606
950
107
1957
06/13
20
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-55
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Cary, NC
—
616
826
—
—
616
826
1,442
146
1987
06/13
20
Chattanooga, TN
—
308
652
—
—
308
652
960
462
1972
06/13
5
Chattanooga, TN
—
260
374
—
—
260
374
634
265
1981
06/13
5
Chattanooga, TN
—
496
824
—
—
496
824
1,320
584
1948
06/13
5
Chattanooga, TN
—
336
341
—
—
336
341
677
241
1974
06/13
5
Chestertown, MD
—
856
290
—
—
856
290
1,146
206
1974
06/13
5
Clearwater, FL
—
433
530
—
—
433
530
963
125
1983
06/13
15
Conyers, GA
—
366
501
—
—
366
501
867
177
1986
06/13
10
Crystal River, FL
—
430
2,971
—
—
430
2,971
3,401
301
1983
06/13
35
Daytona Beach Shores, FL
—
318
720
—
—
318
720
1,038
102
1982
06/13
25
Deland, FL
—
270
1,296
—
—
270
1,296
1,566
153
1993
06/13
30
Denton, NC
—
472
783
—
—
472
783
1,255
185
1969
06/13
15
Doral, FL
—
1,912
1,100
—
—
1,912
1,100
3,012
195
1988
06/13
20
Douglas, GA
—
354
168
—
—
354
168
522
119
1972
06/13
5
Duluth, GA
—
851
845
—
—
851
845
1,696
150
1992
06/13
20
Edgewater, FL
—
419
1,417
—
—
419
1,417
1,836
167
1986
06/13
30
Erwin, NC
—
380
89
—
—
380
89
469
63
1955
06/13
5
Flagler Beach, FL
—
366
1,313
—
—
366
1,313
1,679
133
1993
06/13
35
Fort Myers, FL
—
814
684
—
—
814
684
1,498
162
1986
06/13
15
Fort Myers, FL
—
543
758
—
—
543
758
1,301
107
1986
06/13
25
Franklin, VA
—
103
911
—
—
103
911
1,014
215
1967
06/13
15
Gainesville, GA
—
406
1,830
—
—
406
1,830
2,236
1,296
1966
06/13
5
Greenacres City, FL
—
1,395
1,533
—
—
1,395
1,533
2,928
181
1988
06/13
30
Greensboro, NC
—
516
394
—
—
516
394
910
279
1980
06/13
5
Gulf Breeze, FL
—
1,021
1,382
—
—
1,021
1,382
2,403
490
1960
06/13
10
Haines City, FL
—
405
1,241
—
—
405
1,241
1,646
147
1989
06/13
30
Harrisonburg, VA
—
245
438
—
—
245
438
683
310
1968
06/13
5
Hialeah, FL
—
2,578
1,149
—
—
2,578
1,149
3,727
407
1978
06/13
10
Holly Hill, FL
—
509
699
—
—
509
699
1,208
495
1963
06/13
5
Homosassa, FL
—
344
825
—
—
344
825
1,169
117
1985
06/13
25
Hudson, NC
—
220
207
—
—
220
207
427
37
1994
06/13
20
Huntersville, NC
—
177
830
—
—
177
830
1,007
118
1998
06/13
25
Inverness, FL
—
471
755
—
—
471
755
1,226
178
1984
06/13
15
Jacksonville, FL
—
938
926
—
—
938
926
1,864
164
1979
06/13
20
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-56
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Jacksonville, FL
—
674
821
—
—
674
821
1,495
116
1987
06/13
25
Jonesboro, GA
—
591
1,185
—
—
591
1,185
1,776
839
1965
06/13
5
Jonesborough, TN
—
95
285
—
—
95
285
380
202
1974
06/13
5
Jupiter, FL
—
1,035
1,327
—
—
1,035
1,327
2,362
134
1998
06/13
35
Kannapolis, NC
—
850
834
—
—
850
834
1,684
591
1906
06/13
5
Kernersville, NC
—
284
708
—
—
284
708
992
167
1990
06/13
15
Lady Lake, FL
—
340
1,355
—
—
340
1,355
1,695
160
1996
06/13
30
Lady Lake, FL
—
388
1,537
—
—
388
1,537
1,925
181
1996
06/13
30
Lake City, TN
—
326
514
—
—
326
514
840
364
1958
06/13
5
Lake Placid, FL
—
289
1,402
—
—
289
1,402
1,691
166
1988
06/13
30
Largo, FL
—
258
643
—
—
258
643
901
114
1979
06/13
20
Lawrenceburg, TN
—
205
413
—
—
205
413
618
292
1975
06/13
5
Lawrenceville, GA
—
657
1,764
—
—
657
1,764
2,421
625
1985
06/13
10
Lightfoot, VA
—
177
512
—
—
177
512
689
181
1973
06/13
10
Lynn Haven, FL
—
797
865
—
—
797
865
1,662
306
1974
06/13
10
Macon, GA
—
207
392
—
—
207
392
599
93
1980
06/13
15
Madison Heights, VA
—
215
379
—
—
215
379
594
268
1973
06/13
5
Manassas, VA
—
1,765
1,714
—
—
1,765
1,714
3,479
304
1967
06/13
20
Marietta, GA
—
617
714
—
—
617
714
1,331
253
1974
06/13
10
Mechanicsville, VA
—
343
493
—
—
343
493
836
349
1965
06/13
5
Mocksville, NC
—
189
434
—
—
189
434
623
307
1967
06/13
5
Monroe, NC
—
586
353
—
—
586
353
939
250
1981
06/13
5
Murfreesboro, TN
—
276
554
—
—
276
554
830
131
1989
06/13
15
N Miami Beach, FL
—
915
497
—
—
915
497
1,412
117
1986
06/13
15
Nashville, TN
—
438
1,295
—
—
438
1,295
1,733
153
1994
06/13
30
Nashville, TN
—
627
639
—
—
627
639
1,266
226
1972
06/13
10
New Port Richey, FL
—
463
1,178
—
—
463
1,178
1,641
167
1998
06/13
25
Norcross, GA
—
789
663
—
—
789
663
1,452
156
1986
06/13
15
Norwood, NC
—
519
410
—
—
519
410
929
290
1946
06/13
5
Orlando, FL
—
801
1,135
—
—
801
1,135
1,936
201
1993
06/13
20
Palm Harbor, FL
—
532
384
—
—
532
384
916
136
1983
06/13
10
Punta Gorda, FL (n)
—
1,483
1,330
—
—
1,483
1,330
2,813
235
1972
06/13
20
Radford, VA
—
221
326
—
—
221
326
547
231
1964
06/13
5
Richmond, VA
—
263
563
—
—
263
563
826
199
1981
06/13
10
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-57
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Richmond, VA
—
283
245
—
—
283
245
528
173
1973
06/13
5
Richmond, VA
—
398
673
—
—
398
673
1,071
477
1972
06/13
5
Roanoke, VA
—
264
256
—
—
264
256
520
182
1973
06/13
5
Roanoke, VA
—
103
360
—
—
103
360
463
128
1957
06/13
10
Roxboro, NC
—
452
918
—
—
452
918
1,370
217
1983
06/13
15
Sebastian, FL
—
438
856
—
—
438
856
1,294
152
1987
06/13
20
Sebring, FL
—
326
920
—
—
326
920
1,246
130
1985
06/13
25
South Boston, VA
—
221
1,441
—
—
221
1,441
1,662
255
1975
06/13
20
Spartanburg, SC
—
435
372
—
—
435
372
807
132
1921
06/13
10
Spotsylvania, VA
—
1,398
1,158
—
—
1,398
1,158
2,556
117
1964
06/13
35
Spring Hill, FL
—
460
1,102
—
—
460
1,102
1,562
780
1973
06/13
5
Spring Hill, FL
—
631
1,950
—
—
631
1,950
2,581
230
1988
06/13
30
St. Petersburg, FL
—
207
1,150
—
—
207
1,150
1,357
136
1974
06/13
30
Stuart, FL (n)
—
1,143
2,570
—
—
1,143
2,570
3,713
303
1985
06/13
30
Sun City Center, FL (n)
—
568
3,671
—
—
568
3,671
4,239
371
1971
06/13
35
Tamarac, FL
—
966
1,115
—
—
966
1,115
2,081
395
1972
06/13
10
Tucker, GA
—
395
1,208
—
—
395
1,208
1,603
214
1971
06/13
20
Valrico, FL
—
178
870
—
—
178
870
1,048
103
1981
06/13
30
Virginia Beach, VA
—
326
366
—
—
326
366
692
130
1985
06/13
10
Warner Robins, GA
—
905
1,276
—
—
905
1,276
2,181
452
1973
06/13
10
Wildwood, FL
—
308
953
—
—
308
953
1,261
135
1978
06/13
25
Youngsville, NC
—
237
165
—
—
237
165
402
117
1946
06/13
5
Zephyrhills, FL
—
345
3,112
—
—
345
3,112
3,457
735
1972
06/13
15
Superior Petroleum:
Midway, PA
—
311
708
—
—
311
708
1,019
259
1990
01/06
30
Supervalu:
Huntington, WV
—
1,254
761
—
—
1,254
761
2,015
378
1971
02/97
40
Maple Heights, OH
—
1,035
2,874
—
—
1,035
2,874
3,909
1,428
1985
02/97
40
Susser HQ:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
630
3,131
—
—
630
3,131
3,761
1,393
1982
03/99
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-58
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Sweet Berries Cafe:
Sherman, TX
—
233
126
24
—
233
150
383
75
1969
09/06
20
Taco Bell:
Ocala, FL
—
275
755
—
—
275
755
1,030
284
2001
12/01
40
Phoenix, AZ
—
594
283
—
—
594
283
877
106
1995
12/01
40
Bedford, IN
—
797
937
—
—
797
937
1,734
249
1989
05/06
40
Columbus, IN
—
1,257
2,055
—
—
1,257
2,055
3,312
546
1990
05/06
40
Columbus, IN
—
690
1,213
—
—
690
1,213
1,903
322
2005
05/06
40
Evansville, IN
—
524
1,815
—
—
524
1,815
2,339
482
2005
05/06
40
Evansville, IN
—
221
828
—
—
221
828
1,049
220
2003
05/06
40
Evansville, IN
—
308
1,301
—
—
308
1,301
1,609
345
2000
05/06
40
Fishers, IN
—
990
486
—
—
990
486
1,476
129
1998
05/06
40
Greensburg, IN
—
648
1,079
—
—
648
1,079
1,727
287
1998
05/06
40
Indianapolis, IN
—
547
703
—
—
547
703
1,250
187
2004
05/06
40
Indianapolis, IN
—
1,032
1,650
—
—
1,032
1,650
2,682
438
2004
05/06
40
Madisonville, KY
—
682
1,193
—
—
682
1,193
1,875
317
1999
05/06
40
Ownesboro, KY
—
639
1,326
—
—
639
1,326
1,965
352
2005
05/06
40
Shelbyville, IN
—
670
1,756
—
—
670
1,756
2,426
466
1998
05/06
40
Speedway, IN
—
408
1,426
—
—
408
1,426
1,834
379
2003
05/06
40
Terre Haute, IN
—
1,314
2,249
—
—
1,314
2,249
3,563
597
2003
05/06
40
Terre Haute, IN
—
1,037
1,656
—
—
1,037
1,656
2,693
440
2003
05/06
40
Vincennes, IN
—
502
880
—
—
502
880
1,382
234
2004
05/06
40
Hialeah, FL
—
262
69
—
—
262
(i)
262
(i)
(i)
09/06
(i)
Anderson, SC
—
176
436
—
—
176
436
612
88
2000
12/10
30
Anderson, SC
—
273
820
—
—
273
820
1,093
198
1989
12/10
25
Asheville, NC
—
252
483
—
—
252
483
735
117
1993
12/10
25
Asheville, NC
—
408
732
—
—
408
732
1,140
177
1992
12/10
25
Black Mountain, NC
—
149
313
—
—
149
313
462
76
1992
12/10
25
Blue Ridge, GA
—
276
553
—
—
276
553
829
134
1992
12/10
25
Cedartown, GA
—
353
890
—
—
353
890
1,243
215
1990
12/10
25
Duncan, SC
—
280
483
—
—
280
483
763
97
1999
12/10
30
Easley, SC (n)
—
444
818
—
—
444
818
1,262
198
1991
12/10
25
Fort Payne, AL
—
362
533
—
—
362
533
895
129
1989
12/10
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-59
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Franklin, NC
—
472
687
—
—
472
687
1,159
166
1992
12/10
25
Gaffney, SC
—
388
940
—
—
388
940
1,328
189
1998
12/10
30
Greenville, SC
—
169
330
—
—
169
330
499
80
1990
12/10
25
Greenville, SC
—
414
810
—
—
414
810
1,224
163
1995
12/10
30
Hendersonville, NC
—
569
1,163
—
—
569
1,163
1,732
281
1988
12/10
25
Inman, SC
—
223
502
—
—
223
502
725
101
1999
12/10
30
Lavonia, GA
—
122
359
—
—
122
359
481
72
1999
12/10
30
Madison, AL
—
498
886
—
—
498
886
1,384
214
1985
12/10
25
Oneonta, AL
—
362
881
—
—
362
881
1,243
213
1992
12/10
25
Piedmont, SC
—
249
702
—
—
249
702
951
141
2000
12/10
30
Pisgah Forest, NC
—
260
672
—
—
260
672
932
135
1998
12/10
30
Rainsville, AL
—
411
1,077
—
—
411
1,077
1,488
217
1998
12/10
30
Seneca, SC
—
304
807
—
—
304
807
1,111
195
1993
12/10
25
Simpsonville, SC
—
635
1,022
—
—
635
1,022
1,657
247
1991
12/10
25
Spartanburg, SC
—
239
496
—
—
239
496
735
100
1992
12/10
30
Spartanburg, SC
—
492
949
—
—
492
949
1,441
191
1993
12/10
30
Sylva, NC
—
580
786
—
—
580
786
1,366
158
1994
12/10
30
Toccoa, GA
—
201
600
—
—
201
600
801
121
1993
12/10
30
Anderson, IN
—
313
1,338
—
—
313
1,338
1,651
155
2008
12/12
35
Bloomington, IN
—
332
1,234
—
—
332
1,234
1,566
142
2009
12/12
35
Bloomington, IN
—
275
1,026
—
—
275
1,026
1,301
166
1988
12/12
25
Carmel, IN
—
360
1,546
—
—
360
1,546
1,906
208
1994
12/12
30
Daleville, IN
—
209
893
—
—
209
893
1,102
120
1995
12/12
30
Edinburgh, IN
—
313
1,338
—
—
313
1,338
1,651
155
2007
12/12
35
Evansville, IN
—
209
1,092
—
—
209
1,092
1,301
126
2008
12/12
35
Indianapolis, IN
—
351
1,452
—
—
351
1,452
1,803
196
2005
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
209
799
—
—
209
799
1,008
108
1994
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
256
1,102
—
—
256
1,102
1,358
127
2008
12/12
35
Indianapolis, IN
—
285
1,225
—
—
285
1,225
1,510
141
2008
12/12
35
Indianapolis, IN
—
247
931
—
—
247
931
1,178
125
1995
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
304
1,206
—
—
304
1,206
1,510
139
2010
12/12
35
Jasper, IN
—
200
960
—
—
200
960
1,160
129
1992
12/12
30
New Castle, IN
—
427
1,830
—
—
427
1,830
2,257
247
2006
12/12
30
Owensboro, KY
—
436
1,119
—
—
436
1,119
1,555
129
2010
12/12
35
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-60
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Connersville, IN
—
136
1,280
—
—
136
1,280
1,416
148
1991
07/13
30
Linton, IN
—
155
1,203
—
—
155
1,203
1,358
139
1996
07/13
30
Owensboro, KY
—
136
1,549
—
—
136
1,549
1,685
179
1998
07/13
30
Arnold, MO
—
436
698
—
—
436
698
1,134
94
1991
08/13
25
Collinsville, IL
—
368
1,713
—
—
368
1,713
2,081
231
1993
08/13
25
East Alton, IL
—
271
1,008
—
—
271
1,008
1,279
113
1991
08/13
30
Edwardsville, IL
—
310
1,549
—
—
310
1,549
1,859
174
1987
08/13
30
Eureka, MO
—
466
466
—
—
466
466
932
63
1984
08/13
25
Granite City, IL
—
707
852
—
—
707
852
1,559
82
2006
08/13
35
Hazelwood, MO
—
513
1,470
—
—
513
1,470
1,983
165
1991
08/13
30
Maryland Heights, MO
—
407
862
—
—
407
862
1,269
97
1991
08/13
30
O'Fallon, MO
—
580
1,403
—
—
580
1,403
1,983
135
2003
08/13
35
O'Fallon, MO
—
445
1,770
—
—
445
1,770
2,215
199
1985
08/13
30
St. Charles, MO
—
581
872
—
—
580
872
1,452
98
2000
08/13
30
St. Louis, MO
—
465
1,171
—
—
465
1,171
1,636
113
2009
08/13
35
St. Louis, MO
—
252
785
—
—
252
785
1,037
88
1990
08/13
30
St. Louis, MO
—
252
1,047
—
—
252
1,047
1,299
141
1981
08/13
25
Fayetteville, NC
—
448
1,334
—
—
448
1,334
1,782
113
1998
06/14
30
Fayetteville, NC
—
686
1,631
—
—
686
1,631
2,317
166
1992
06/14
25
Fayetteville, NC
—
269
1,771
—
—
269
1,771
2,040
180
1993
06/14
25
Fayetteville, NC
—
298
1,989
—
—
298
1,989
2,287
169
2005
06/14
30
Fayetteville, NC
—
149
1,652
—
—
149
1,652
1,801
168
1988
06/14
25
Fayetteville, NC
—
388
1,552
—
—
388
1,552
1,940
132
1996
06/14
30
Fayetteville, NC
—
289
1,205
—
—
289
1,205
1,494
102
1998
06/14
30
Fayetteville, NC
—
497
1,691
—
—
497
1,691
2,188
143
2008
06/14
30
Fayetteville, NC
—
607
1,135
—
—
607
1,135
1,742
115
1982
06/14
25
Holly Ridge, NC
—
189
1,791
—
—
189
1,791
1,980
130
2012
06/14
35
Hope Mills, NC
—
438
2,138
—
—
438
2,138
2,576
217
1990
06/14
25
Jacksonville, NC
—
428
2,327
—
—
428
2,327
2,755
237
1993
06/14
25
Jacksonville, NC
—
388
2,347
—
—
388
2,347
2,735
170
2007
06/14
35
Jacksonville, NC
—
398
2,069
—
—
398
2,069
2,467
175
1994
06/14
30
Jacksonville, NC
—
577
1,304
—
—
577
1,304
1,881
95
2013
06/14
35
Leland, NC
—
289
1,205
—
—
289
1,205
1,494
88
2008
06/14
35
Lumberton, NC
—
368
2,208
—
—
368
2,208
2,576
187
2003
06/14
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-61
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Midway Park, NC
—
467
2,069
—
—
467
2,069
2,536
210
1993
06/14
25
Pembroke, NC
—
438
1,095
—
—
438
1,095
1,533
93
2008
06/14
30
Saint Pauls, NC
—
419
767
—
—
419
767
1,186
65
2008
06/14
30
Shallotte, NC
—
329
827
—
—
329
827
1,156
60
2011
06/14
35
Spring Lake, NC
—
408
2,009
—
—
408
2,009
2,417
146
2009
06/14
35
Whiteville, NC
—
179
1,315
—
—
179
1,315
1,494
95
2010
06/14
35
Wilmington, NC
—
587
2,277
—
—
587
2,277
2,864
165
2006
06/14
35
Wilmington, NC
—
547
1,423
—
—
547
1,423
1,970
103
2013
06/14
35
Wilmington, NC
—
239
1,463
—
—
239
1,463
1,702
106
2013
06/14
35
Swansboro, NC
—
430
1,359
—
—
430
1,359
1,789
58
2015
04/15
40
Buffalo Grove, IL
—
234
1,236
—
—
234
1,236
1,470
39
1987
03/16
25
Columbia City, IN
—
122
1,535
—
—
122
1,535
1,657
49
1990
03/16
25
Dowagiac, MI
—
131
1,236
—
—
131
1,236
1,367
33
1999
03/16
30
Edwardsburg, MI
—
47
1,479
—
—
47
1,479
1,526
39
1998
03/16
30
Elkhart, IN
—
393
1,618
—
—
393
1,618
2,011
37
2008
03/16
35
Fox Lake, IL
—
309
1,376
—
—
309
1,376
1,685
36
2006
03/16
30
Freeport, IL
—
84
2,141
—
—
84
2,141
2,225
57
1999
03/16
30
Kendallville, IN
—
150
1,637
—
—
150
1,637
1,787
43
1992
03/16
30
Knox, IN
—
66
1,255
—
—
66
1,255
1,321
40
1993
03/16
25
Lake Delton, WI
—
815
599
—
—
815
599
1,414
14
2011
03/16
35
Lake In The Hills, IL
—
402
2,029
—
—
402
2,029
2,431
54
1998
03/16
30
Ligonier, IN
—
216
1,021
—
—
216
1,021
1,237
27
2000
03/16
30
Lindenhurst, IL
—
609
768
—
—
609
768
1,377
20
1999
03/16
30
McHenry, IL
—
468
1,814
—
—
468
1,814
2,282
48
2006
03/16
30
Monroe, WI
—
515
1,030
—
—
515
1,030
1,545
27
1999
03/16
30
Mundelein, IL
—
178
1,134
—
—
178
1,134
1,312
30
1999
03/16
30
Mundelein, IL
—
131
1,544
—
—
131
1,544
1,675
41
2004
03/16
30
Nappanee, IN
—
178
1,404
—
—
178
1,404
1,582
32
2008
03/16
35
Portage, WI
—
197
1,479
—
—
197
1,479
1,676
39
1999
03/16
30
Richland Center, WI
—
215
1,236
—
—
215
1,236
1,451
33
2000
03/16
30
Rochester, IN
—
215
1,787
—
—
215
1,787
2,002
57
1993
03/16
25
Rockford, IL
—
328
1,413
—
—
328
1,413
1,741
37
1999
03/16
30
Roscoe, IL
—
346
1,479
—
—
346
1,479
1,825
33
2010
03/16
35
Roseland, IN
—
496
880
—
—
496
880
1,376
23
2001
03/16
30
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-62
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Round Lake Beach, IL
—
159
2,169
—
—
159
2,169
2,328
57
2005
03/16
30
South Bend, IN
—
365
1,170
—
—
365
1,170
1,535
26
2014
03/16
35
South Bend, IN
—
365
965
—
—
365
965
1,330
22
2010
03/16
35
South Bend, IN
—
291
788
—
—
291
788
1,079
21
2006
03/16
30
St. Joseph, MI
—
94
1,413
—
—
94
1,413
1,507
32
2007
03/16
35
Watervliet, MI
—
281
1,105
—
—
281
1,105
1,386
29
2000
03/16
30
Wauconda, IL
—
169
1,358
—
—
169
1,358
1,527
36
2001
03/16
30
Waukegan, IL
—
570
1,674
—
—
570
1,674
2,244
53
1997
03/16
25
West Baraboo, WI
—
150
1,348
—
—
150
1,348
1,498
36
1999
03/16
30
Wheeling, IL
—
486
1,861
—
—
486
1,861
2,347
49
2000
03/16
30
Winnebago, IL
—
131
1,041
—
—
131
1,041
1,172
24
2009
03/16
35
Wisconsin Dells, WI
—
365
1,095
—
—
365
1,095
1,460
29
1999
03/16
30
Zion, IL
—
150
1,554
—
—
150
1,554
1,704
35
2008
03/16
35
Taco Bueno:
Moore, OK
—
624
507
—
—
624
507
1,131
22
2015
01/15
40
Mansfield, TX
—
808
—
508
—
808
508
1,316
16
2015
06/15
(m)
40
Flower Mound, TX
—
1,056
—
—
—
1,056
(e)
1,056
(e)
(e)
04/16
(m)
Taco Cabana:
Austin, TX
—
561
1,227
—
—
561
1,227
1,788
66
1994
02/15
35
Houston, TX
—
1,070
978
—
—
1,016
978
1,994
73
1998
02/15
25
Houston, TX
—
667
852
—
—
667
852
1,519
53
2000
02/15
30
Houston, TX
—
590
1,284
—
—
590
1,284
1,874
80
1987
02/15
30
San Antonio, TX
—
492
1,283
—
—
492
1,283
1,775
69
1995
02/15
35
Texas Roadhouse:
Grand Junction, CO
—
584
920
—
—
584
920
1,504
346
1997
12/01
40
Thornton, CO
—
599
1,019
—
—
599
1,019
1,618
383
1998
12/01
40
Palm Bay, FL
—
1,035
1,512
—
—
1,035
1,512
2,547
279
2004
06/11
30
TGI Friday's:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
1,210
1,532
—
—
1,157
1,532
2,689
576
1995
12/01
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-63
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
The Beach:
Mason, OH
—
1,707
1,303
—
—
1,707
1,303
3,010
198
1985
03/13
25
The Containter Store:
Plano, TX
—
1,758
5,115
—
—
1,758
5,115
6,873
530
2009
05/13
35
The Snooty Fox:
Cincinnati, OH
—
282
521
403
—
543
662
1,205
221
1998
12/01
40
The Tile Shop:
Scarsdale, NY
—
4,509
2,454
352
—
4,509
2,807
7,316
821
1996
09/97
40
Buford, GA
—
1,267
2,406
25
—
1,267
2,430
3,697
753
2003
07/04
40
Third Federal Savings:
Parma, OH
—
370
238
1,100
—
370
1,338
1,708
594
1977
09/06
20
Tile Outlets of America:
Sarasota, FL
—
1,168
1,904
735
—
1,170
2,639
3,809
764
1988
09/97
40
TitleMax:
Geneva, IL
—
473
436
—
—
484
375
859
146
1996
12/01
40
Mobile, AL
—
491
498
—
—
491
498
989
187
1997
12/01
40
Dallas, TX
—
1,554
1,229
46
—
1,554
1,275
2,829
362
1982
06/05
40
Aiken, SC
—
442
646
—
—
442
646
1,088
180
1989
08/08
30
Anniston, AL
—
160
453
—
—
160
453
613
95
2008
08/08
40
Berkeley, MO
—
237
282
—
—
237
282
519
118
1961
08/08
20
Cheraw, SC
—
88
330
—
—
88
330
418
110
1976
08/08
25
Columbia, SC
—
212
319
—
—
212
319
531
89
1987
08/08
30
Dalton, GA
—
178
347
—
—
178
347
525
116
1972
08/08
25
Darlington, SC
—
47
267
—
—
47
267
314
90
1973
08/08
25
Fairfield, AL
—
133
178
—
—
133
178
311
59
1974
08/08
25
Gadsden, AL
—
250
389
—
—
250
389
639
81
2007
08/08
40
Hueytown, AL
—
135
93
—
—
135
93
228
78
1948
08/08
10
Jonesboro, GA
—
675
292
—
—
675
292
967
98
1970
08/08
25
Lawrenceville, GA
—
370
332
—
—
370
332
702
93
1986
08/08
30
Lewisburg, TN
—
70
298
—
—
70
298
368
71
1998
08/08
35
Macon, GA
—
103
290
—
—
103
290
393
121
1967
08/08
20
Marietta, GA
—
285
278
—
—
285
278
563
116
1967
08/08
20
Memphis, TN
—
111
237
—
—
111
237
348
66
1981
08/08
30
Memphis, TN
—
226
444
—
—
226
444
670
124
1986
08/08
30
Montgomery, AL
—
96
233
—
—
96
233
329
78
1970
08/08
25
Nashville, TN
—
256
301
—
—
256
301
557
84
1982
08/08
30
Nashville, TN
—
268
276
—
—
268
276
544
93
1978
08/08
25
Norcross, GA
—
599
350
—
—
599
350
949
117
1975
08/08
25
Pulaski, TN
—
109
361
—
—
109
361
470
101
1986
08/08
30
Riverdale, GA
—
877
400
—
—
877
400
1,277
134
1978
08/08
25
Springfield, MO
—
125
230
—
—
125
230
355
77
1979
08/08
25
Springfield, MO
—
220
400
—
—
220
400
620
134
1979
08/08
25
St. Louis, MO
—
134
398
—
—
134
398
532
95
1993
08/08
35
St. Louis, MO
—
244
288
—
—
244
288
532
96
1971
08/08
25
Sylacauga, AL
—
94
191
—
—
94
191
285
53
1986
08/08
30
Taylors, SC
—
299
372
—
—
299
372
671
89
1999
08/08
35
Bay Minette, AL
—
51
113
—
—
51
113
164
27
1980
01/11
25
N. Richland Hills, TX
—
132
132
—
—
132
132
264
39
1976
01/11
20
Petersburg, VA
—
139
366
—
—
139
366
505
108
1979
02/11
20
Savannah, GA
—
231
361
—
—
231
361
592
105
1972
03/11
20
Fort Worth, TX
—
131
312
—
—
119
312
431
72
1985
03/11
25
Hoover, AL
—
378
546
—
—
378
546
924
127
1970
03/11
25
Eufaula, AL
—
61
360
—
—
61
360
421
77
1980
08/11
25
Kansas City, MO
—
69
129
—
—
69
129
198
35
1920
08/11
20
Arnold, MO
—
321
120
—
—
321
120
441
31
1960
10/11
20
Bristol, VA
—
199
517
—
—
199
517
716
90
2001
10/11
30
Fairview Heights, IL
—
93
185
—
—
93
185
278
39
1979
10/11
25
Florissant, MO
—
143
153
—
—
143
153
296
32
1974
10/11
25
Greenville, SC (n)
—
602
612
—
—
602
612
1,214
127
2008
10/11
25
Jonesboro, GA
—
301
683
—
—
301
683
984
102
2007
10/11
35
Olive Branch, MS
—
121
312
—
—
121
312
433
65
1978
10/11
25
Sugar Creek, MO
—
202
181
—
—
202
181
383
38
1978
10/11
25
Roanoke, VA
—
158
207
—
—
158
207
365
45
1950
08/12
20
Fredericksburg, VA
—
228
555
—
—
228
555
783
95
1989
09/12
25
Florissant, MO
—
119
288
—
—
119
288
407
47
1970
12/12
25
Savannah, GA
—
259
359
—
—
259
359
618
37
2012
05/13
35
South Boston, VA
—
163
133
—
—
163
133
296
24
1980
05/13
20
O'Fallon, MO
—
75
261
—
—
75
261
336
33
1981
11/13
25
Crest Hill, IL
—
92
323
—
—
92
323
415
29
1963
03/15
20
St. Louis, MO
—
76
237
—
—
76
237
313
21
1953
03/15
20
Tony's Tires:
Montgomery, AL
—
593
1,187
43
—
593
1,229
1,822
335
1998
08/06
40
Toys R Us:
Gastonia, NC
—
1,825
—
6,101
—
1,825
6,101
7,926
820
1998
10/11
(m)
35
Parma, OH
—
688
2,767
—
—
688
2,767
3,455
213
1980
06/15
25
Tractor Supply Co.:
Aransas Pass, TX
—
101
1,399
353
—
100
1,753
1,853
699
1983
03/99
40
Tutor Time:
Elk Grove, CA
—
1,216
2,786
9
—
1,216
2,750
3,966
521
2009
09/08
40
Twenty Seven Truck Stop:
Lake Placid, FL
—
2,532
1,157
491
—
2,532
1,648
4,180
505
1990
12/05
40
Twin Peaks:
Beaumont, TX
—
439
1,363
336
—
864
1,462
2,326
516
2000
12/01
(g)
40
Olathe, KS
—
525
731
—
—
525
731
1,256
131
2005
09/10
35
ULTA Salon, Cosmetics and Fragrance:
Florissant, MO
—
423
499
1,444
—
425
1,942
2,367
360
1996
04/03
(g)
40
Lapeer, MI
—
408
2,086
540
—
408
2,571
2,979
484
2007
10/05
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-64
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Ultra Car Wash:
Mobile, AL
—
1,071
1,086
—
—
1,071
1,086
2,157
255
2005
08/07
40
Lilburn, GA
—
1,396
1,119
—
—
1,396
1,119
2,515
241
2004
05/08
40
Uni-Mart:
East Brady, PA
—
269
583
—
—
269
583
852
332
1987
08/05
20
Pleasant Gap, PA
—
332
593
—
—
332
593
925
337
1996
08/05
20
Port Vue, PA
—
824
118
—
—
824
118
942
67
1953
08/05
20
Punxsutawney, PA
—
253
542
—
—
253
542
795
308
1983
08/05
20
Shamokin, PA
—
324
506
—
—
324
506
830
288
1956
08/05
20
Shippensburg, PA
—
204
330
—
—
204
330
534
188
1989
08/05
20
Wilkes-Barre, PA
—
171
422
—
—
171
422
593
240
1999
08/05
20
Wilkes-Barre, PA
—
178
471
—
—
178
471
649
268
1989
08/05
20
Williamsport, PA
—
909
122
—
—
909
122
1,031
69
1950
08/05
20
Ashland, PA
—
355
545
—
—
355
545
900
308
1977
09/05
20
Mountaintop, PA
—
423
616
—
—
423
616
1,039
348
1987
09/05
20
Effort, PA
—
1,297
1,202
—
—
1,297
1,202
2,499
329
2000
01/06
40
McSherrystown, PA
—
135
365
—
—
135
365
500
100
1988
01/06
40
Milesburg, PA
—
134
373
—
—
134
373
507
102
1987
01/06
40
Nuangola, PA
—
1,062
1,203
—
—
1,062
1,195
2,257
330
2000
01/06
40
Punxsutawney, PA
—
294
650
—
—
294
650
944
178
1983
01/06
40
United Rentals:
Carrollton, TX
—
478
535
—
—
478
535
1,013
161
1981
12/04
40
Cedar Park, TX (n)
—
535
829
—
—
535
829
1,364
250
1990
12/04
40
Clearwater, FL (n)
—
1,173
1,811
—
—
1,173
1,811
2,984
545
2001
12/04
40
Fort Collins, CO (n)
—
2,057
978
—
—
2,057
978
3,035
294
1975
12/04
40
Irving, TX
—
708
911
—
—
708
911
1,619
274
1984
12/04
40
La Porte, TX
—
1,115
2,125
—
—
1,115
2,125
3,240
640
2000
12/04
40
Littleton, CO
—
1,743
1,944
—
—
1,743
1,944
3,687
585
2002
12/04
40
Oklahoma City, OK
—
744
1,265
—
—
744
1,265
2,009
381
1997
12/04
40
Perrysberg, OH (n)
—
642
1,119
—
—
642
1,119
1,761
337
1979
12/04
40
Plano, TX
—
1,030
1,148
—
—
1,030
1,148
2,178
346
1996
12/04
40
Temple, TX (n)
—
1,160
1,360
—
—
1,160
1,360
2,520
410
1998
12/04
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-65
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Fort Worth, TX
—
1,428
—
—
—
1,428
(i)
1,428
(i)
(i)
01/05
(i)
Fort Worth, TX
—
510
1,128
—
—
510
1,128
1,638
337
1997
01/05
40
Melbourne, FL
—
747
607
—
—
747
607
1,354
176
1970
05/05
40
University of Phoenix:
Glen Allen, VA
—
2,177
2,600
670
—
2,177
3,270
5,447
1,501
1995
06/95
40
Vacant Land:
Homestead, PA
—
383
—
81
—
464
(e)
464
(e)
(e)
02/97
(e)
Indianapolis, IN
—
640
—
—
—
700
(e)
700
(e)
(e)
12/01
(e)
Southfield, MI
—
405
644
—
—
389
(e)
389
(e)
(e)
12/01
(e)
Bonita Springs, FL
—
112
—
—
—
25
(e)
25
(e)
(e)
09/06
(e)
Lancaster, OH
—
1,035
—
—
—
218
(e)
218
(e)
(e)
01/08
(e)
Bakersfield, CA
—
3,303
3,845
—
—
1,826
(e)
1,826
(e)
(e)
03/08
(e)
Vacant Property:
Corpus Christi, TX
—
125
137
195
—
125
332
457
138
1967
11/93
40
Arlington, TX
—
435
2,300
334
—
435
2,634
3,069
1,267
1996
06/96
38
Tampa, FL
—
2,128
1,522
—
—
2,128
1,522
3,650
780
1994
06/96
40
Sacramento, CA
—
1,144
2,961
—
—
1,144
2,961
4,105
1,481
1996
12/96
40
Conyers, GA
—
320
556
29
—
320
585
905
274
1997
06/97
40
Sarasota, FL
—
1,428
1,703
—
—
1,428
1,703
3,131
550
1988
09/97
40
Copperas Cove, TX
—
204
432
171
—
204
603
807
121
1972
11/98
40
Nacogdoches, TX
—
397
1,257
—
—
397
1,257
1,654
570
1997
11/98
40
Beaumont, TX
—
941
1,618
1,505
—
941
3,123
4,064
1,100
1992
03/99
40
Burton, MI
—
620
707
—
—
620
707
1,327
266
1997
12/01
40
Eden Prairie, MN
—
65
181
81
—
65
261
326
96
1997
12/01
40
Hammond, LA
—
248
814
62
—
248
627
875
247
1997
12/01
40
Homewood, AL
—
1,032
697
—
—
1,032
697
1,729
262
1997
12/01
40
Independence, MO
—
1,679
2,302
115
—
1,679
2,417
4,096
898
1996
12/01
40
Kennedale, TX
—
400
692
—
—
391
692
1,083
260
1985
12/01
40
Swansea, IL
—
46
132
—
—
46
132
178
75
1997
12/01
40
Tacoma, WA
—
527
795
182
—
527
976
1,503
305
1981
12/01
40
Valrico, FL
—
1,235
3,255
—
—
814
1,111
1,925
12
1997
06/02
12
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-66
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Orlando, FL
—
37
101
—
—
37
101
138
33
2001
02/04
40
Buford, GA
—
751
1,979
336
—
751
2,315
3,066
652
2003
07/04
(g)
40
Cohoes, NY
—
27
145
59
—
27
204
231
56
1994
09/04
40
Hudson Falls, NY
—
57
780
39
—
57
819
876
250
1990
09/04
40
Fort Worth, TX
—
2,505
2,138
—
—
2,505
2,138
4,643
635
1988
02/05
40
Monticello, NY
—
664
769
—
—
664
769
1,433
227
1996
03/05
40
Lapeer, MI
—
37
264
—
—
37
251
288
60
2007
10/05
40
Abbottstown, PA
—
110
400
—
—
110
400
510
110
2000
01/06
40
Ridgeland, MS
—
436
523
133
—
436
656
1,092
193
1997
08/06
40
Tucson, AZ
—
996
—
2,742
—
996
2,742
3,738
637
2007
12/06
(m)
40
Fort Collins, CO
—
390
895
—
—
390
895
1,285
175
1995
02/11
30
Overland Park, KS
—
1,166
—
1,741
—
1,166
1,741
2,907
223
2011
04/11
(m)
40
Amherst, NY
—
230
175
—
—
230
175
405
16
1977
02/15
20
Value City Furniture:
White Marsh, MD
—
3,762
—
3,006
—
3,762
3,006
6,768
1,412
1998
10/97
(g)
40
VCA Animal Hospital:
Mission, KS
—
891
3,758
—
—
852
3,758
4,610
600
2000
03/12
30
Verizon Wireless:
Anderson, SC (n)
—
38
—
—
—
38
—
38
(e)
(i)
07/14
(e)
Bristol, VA
—
175
512
—
—
175
512
687
50
2000
07/14
25
North Olmsted, OH
—
324
1,015
—
—
324
1,015
1,339
10
1983
08/16
40
Virginia College:
Knoxville, TN
—
1,500
5,571
—
—
1,500
5,571
7,071
797
1996
09/12
30
Vitamin Shoppe, The:
Cincinnati, OH
—
297
443
385
—
312
813
1,125
281
1999
06/98
40
Walgreens:
Altamonte Springs, FL
—
1,137
2,053
—
—
1,137
2,053
3,190
1,071
1995
01/96
40
Sunrise, FL
—
1,958
1,401
—
—
1,958
1,401
3,359
477
1994
05/03
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-67
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Tulsa, OK
—
1,193
3,056
—
—
1,193
3,056
4,249
882
2003
06/05
40
Boise, ID
—
792
1,875
—
—
792
1,875
2,667
425
2000
03/10
30
Nampa, ID
—
1,062
2,253
—
—
1,062
2,253
3,315
510
2000
03/10
30
Pueblo, CO
—
899
3,313
—
—
899
3,313
4,212
557
2000
12/11
30
Rapid City, SD
—
1,387
2,957
—
—
1,387
2,957
4,344
419
2000
01/12
35
Hamilton, OH
—
731
2,879
—
—
731
2,879
3,610
476
2000
01/12
30
Waterford Nails & Spa:
Orlando, FL
—
40
111
—
—
40
111
151
36
2001
02/04
40
Wawa:
Clearwater, FL
—
1,184
2,526
44
—
1,476
(i)
1,476
(i)
(i)
05/93
(i)
Wehrenberg Theater:
Cedar Rapids, IA
—
1,567
8,433
—
—
1,567
8,433
10,000
1,151
2011
07/11
40
Wendy's:
Sacramento, CA
—
586
—
—
—
586
(i)
586
(i)
(i)
02/98
(i)
New Kensington, PA
—
501
333
—
—
501
333
834
125
1980
12/01
40
Orland Park, IL
—
562
556
—
—
562
377
939
144
1995
12/01
40
Boerne, TX
—
456
679
—
—
456
679
1,135
110
1986
12/12
25
Brownsburg, IN
—
242
1,483
—
—
242
1,483
1,725
240
1984
12/12
25
Converse, TX
—
301
554
—
—
301
554
855
64
2007
12/12
35
Everett, WA
—
339
1,018
—
—
339
1,018
1,357
137
2000
12/12
30
Everett, WA
—
486
437
—
—
486
437
923
71
1979
12/12
25
Fishers, IN
—
544
514
—
—
544
514
1,058
69
2000
12/12
30
Fishers, IN
—
766
717
—
—
766
717
1,483
97
1990
12/12
30
Henderson, NV
—
370
311
—
—
370
311
681
50
1988
12/12
25
Henderson, NV
—
398
1,028
—
—
398
1,028
1,426
138
1991
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
252
1,454
—
—
252
1,454
1,706
196
1999
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
213
1,444
—
—
213
1,444
1,657
167
2003
12/12
35
Indianapolis, IN
—
417
1,318
—
—
417
1,318
1,735
178
1991
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
87
1,009
—
—
87
1,009
1,096
163
1973
12/12
25
Indianapolis, IN
—
271
1,221
—
—
271
1,221
1,492
197
1974
12/12
25
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-68
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Indianapolis, IN
—
281
1,018
—
—
281
1,018
1,299
137
1996
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
320
602
—
—
320
602
922
81
1998
12/12
30
Indianapolis, IN
—
320
1,086
—
—
320
1,086
1,406
146
1993
12/12
30
Las Vegas, NV
—
368
1,095
—
—
368
1,095
1,463
148
1999
12/12
30
Las Vegas, NV
—
360
253
—
—
360
253
613
41
1980
12/12
25
Las Vegas, NV
—
475
1,202
—
—
475
1,202
1,677
194
1986
12/12
25
Las Vegas, NV
—
533
1,424
—
—
533
1,424
1,957
192
2001
12/12
30
Las Vegas, NV
—
475
1,182
—
—
475
1,182
1,657
159
1996
12/12
30
Las Vegas, NV
—
368
1,018
—
—
368
1,018
1,386
137
2001
12/12
30
Lynnwood, WA
—
571
1,695
—
—
571
1,695
2,266
274
1978
12/12
25
N. Las Vegas, NV
—
310
1,463
—
—
310
1,463
1,773
169
2001
12/12
35
Noblesville, IN
—
582
979
—
—
582
979
1,561
132
1998
12/12
30
Port Orchard, WA
—
784
1,540
—
—
784
1,540
2,324
207
1996
12/12
30
Poulsbo, WA
—
620
901
—
—
620
901
1,521
91
2012
12/12
40
San Antonio, TX
—
370
272
—
—
370
272
642
37
1993
12/12
30
San Antonio, TX
—
931
223
—
—
931
223
1,154
30
1993
12/12
30
San Antonio, TX
—
553
892
—
—
303
892
1,195
144
1986
12/12
25
San Antonio, TX
—
688
727
—
—
688
727
1,415
98
1993
12/12
30
San Antonio, TX
—
242
1,067
—
—
242
1,067
1,309
172
1977
12/12
25
Lexington Park, MD
—
327
773
—
—
327
773
1,100
63
1982
07/14
30
Alcoa, TN
—
587
547
—
—
587
547
1,134
51
1977
02/15
20
Lincoln Park, MI
—
326
435
—
—
326
435
761
33
1988
02/15
25
North Canton, OH
—
121
852
—
—
121
852
973
53
1986
02/15
30
Roanoke, VA
—
172
672
—
—
172
672
844
63
1983
02/15
20
Whataburger:
Albuquerque, NM
—
624
419
—
—
624
419
1,043
158
1995
12/01
40
San Antonio, TX
—
275
801
—
—
275
801
1,076
43
1988
02/15
35
Wherehouse Music:
Independence, MO
—
503
1,209
—
—
503
1,209
1,712
334
1994
12/05
40
Winn-Dixie:
Columbus, GA
—
1,023
1,875
—
—
1,023
1,875
2,898
631
1984
07/03
40
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-69
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:
Ziebart:
Maplewood, MN
—
308
311
—
—
308
311
619
92
1990
02/05
40
Middleburg Heights, OH
—
199
148
—
—
199
148
347
44
1961
02/05
40
Leasehold Interests:
Lima, OH
—
1,290
—
—
—
1,290
(e)
1,290
1,277
(e)
08/01
(e)
Oklahoma City, OK
—
3,275
—
—
—
3,275
(e)
3,275
214
(e)
01/16
(e)
SUBTOTAL
$
13,452
$
2,098,136
$
3,741,855
$
798,807
$
—
$
2,107,480
$
4,489,248
$
6,596,728
$
739,505
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-70
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Direct Financing Leases:
CVS:
Lafayette, LA
$
—
$
—
$
949
$
—
$
—
$
—
(c)
(c)
(c)
1995
01/96
(c)
Oklahoma City, OK
—
(l)
1,365
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
1997
06/97
(c)
Oklahoma City, OK
—
(l)
1,419
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
1997
06/97
(c)
Denny's:
Stockton, CA
—
940
509
—
—
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
1982
09/06
(d)
Food 4 Less:
Chula Vista, CA
—
—
4,266
—
—
—
(c)
(c)
(c)
1995
11/98
(c)
Jared Jewelers:
Toledo, OH
—
(l)
1,458
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
1998
12/01
(c)
Lewisville, TX
—
(l)
1,503
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
1998
12/01
(c)
Glendale, AZ
—
(l)
1,599
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
1998
12/01
(c)
Rite Aid:
Kennett Square, PA
—
(l)
—
1,984
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
2000
12/00
(c)
Arlington, VA
—
(l)
3,201
—
—
(l)
(c)
(c)
(c)
2000
02/02
(c)
Sunshine Energy:
Altamont, KS
—
124
142
—
—
(d)
(d)
(d)
(d)
1979
07/09
(d)
SUBTOTAL
$
—
$
1,064
$
16,411
$
1,984
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-71
Table of Contents
Initial Cost to
Company
Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in Latest Income
Statement is
Computed (Years)
Encumbrances
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Improvements
Carrying
Costs
Land
Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
Total
Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
Date of
Construction
Date
Acquired
Real Estate Held for Sale the Company has Invested in:
Applebee's:
Mesa, AZ
$
—
$
974
$
1,514
$
—
$
—
$
974
$
1,514
$
2,488
$
313
1992
10/10
(h)
30
CarQuest:
Bellevue, NE
—
29
142
—
—
29
142
171
43
1965
12/10
(h)
20
Chipotle:
Hadley, MA
—
45
—
—
—
505
—
505
(e)
(e)
02/08
0
Power Center:
Woodstock, GA
—
261
701
—
—
260
492
752
117
1997
07/08
(h)
40
SunTrust:
Nashville, TN
—
679
394
—
—
679
394
1,073
259
1949
06/13
(h)
5
Zephyrhills, FL
—
267
1,301
—
—
267
1,301
1,568
143
1984
06/13
(h)
30
Palm Harbor, FL
—
836
1,139
—
—
836
1,139
1,975
188
1984
06/13
(h)
20
Orlando, FL
—
637
1,415
—
—
637
1,415
2,052
186
1999
06/13
(h)
25
Raleigh, NC
—
798
1,286
—
—
798
1,286
2,084
212
1974
06/13
(h)
20
Cape Coral, FL
—
1,065
1,032
—
—
1,065
1,032
2,097
170
1980
06/13
(h)
20
Boca Raton, FL
—
1,663
654
—
—
1,663
654
2,317
215
1977
06/13
(h)
10
Washington, DC
—
2,095
945
—
—
2,095
945
3,040
104
1950
06/13
(h)
30
Hallandale Beach, FL
—
1,735
2,343
—
—
1,735
2,343
4,078
386
1971
06/13
(h)
20
Chapel Hill, NC
—
323
541
—
—
323
541
864
119
1963
06/13
(h)
15
Vacant Land:
Hadley, MA
—
2,824
—
—
—
5
—
5
(e)
(e)
02/08
0
Vacant Property:
Woodstock, GA
—
1,937
1,285
—
—
784
277
1,061
277
1997
05/03
(h)
40
Neosho, MO
—
352
775
—
—
352
330
682
231
1992
07/09
(h)
18
SUBTOTAL
$
—
$
16,520
$
15,467
$
—
$
—
$
13,008
$
13,805
$
26,813
$
2,963
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-72
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION
December 31, 2016
(dollars in thousands)
(a)
Transactions in real estate and accumulated depreciation during
2016
,
2015
, and
2014
are summarized as follows:
2016
2015
2014
Land, buildings, and leasehold interests:
Balance at the beginning of year
$
5,913,547
$
5,236,251
$
4,686,844
Acquisitions, completed construction and tenant improvements
833,764
717,899
601,168
Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests
(91,818
)
(36,633
)
(50,938
)
Provision for loss on impairment of real estate
(7,896
)
(3,970
)
(823
)
Balance at the close of year
$
6,647,597
$
5,913,547
$
5,236,251
Accumulated depreciation and amortization:
Balance at the beginning of year
$
624,607
$
513,175
$
418,136
Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests
(16,286
)
(7,377
)
(9,153
)
Depreciation and amortization expense
134,146
118,809
104,192
Balance at the close of year
$
742,467
$
624,607
$
513,175
As of
December 31, 2016
,
2015
, and
2014
, the detailed real estate schedule excludes work in progress of
$24,057
,
$61,354
and
$28,908
, respectively, which is included in the above reconciliation.
(b)
As of
December 31, 2016
, the leases are treated as either operating or financing leases for federal income tax purposes. As of
December 31, 2016
, the aggregate cost of the properties owned by NNN that are under operating leases were
$6,532,163
and financing leases were
$2,703
.
(c)
For financial reporting purposes, the portion of the lease relating to the building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.
(d)
For financial reporting purposes, the lease for the land and building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.
(e)
NNN owns only the land for this property.
(f)
Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN purchased the buildings from the tenants upon completion of construction, generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.
(g)
Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. NNN developed the buildings, generally completing construction within 12 months from the acquisition date of the land.
(h)
As of December 31, 2016, this property has been classified as held for sale. Accumulated depreciation and amortization were recorded prior to this reclassification.
(i)
NNN owns only the land for this property, which is subject to a ground lease between NNN and the tenant. The tenant funded the improvements on the property.
(j)
Property is encumbered as a part of NNN's
$15,151
long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement, net of premium.
(k)
Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN funds the tenant's construction draws. Building improvements are pending final funding which is anticipated to occur within six months. Depreciation is based on store opening and costs to date, and will be adjusted at time of final funding.
(l)
NNN owns only the building for this property. The land is subject to a ground lease between NNN and an unrelated third party.
(m)
Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN funds the tenant's construction draws, final funding occurs generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.
(n)
The tenant of this property has subleased the property. The tenant continues to be responsible for complying with all the terms of the lease agreement and is continuing to pay rent on this property to NNN.
(o)
Date acquired represents acquisition date of land and building. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN funds additional tenant construction draws. Final funding generally within 12 months from acquisition.
(p)
The land is subject to a ground lease between NNN and an unrelated third party. Pursuant to the lease agreement, NNN funds the tenant's construction draws, final funding occurs generally within 12 months from the execution of the ground lease.
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.
F-73
NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE
December 31, 2016
(dollars in thousands)
Description
Interest
Rate
Maturity
Date
Periodic
Payment
Terms
Prior
Liens
Face
Amount
of Mortgages
Carrying
Amount of
Mortgages (e)
Principal
Amount
of Loans Subject
to Delinquent
Principal or
Interest
First mortgages on properties:
Marlow Heights, MD
7.000
%
5/14/2016
(b)
—
$
750
$
750
$
750
Corpus Christi, TX
4.500
%
3/1/2018
(b)
—
500
500
—
$
1,250
$
1,250
(a)
$
750
(a)
The following shows the changes in the carrying amounts of mortgage loans during the years:
2016
2015
2014
Balance at beginning of year
$
8,661
$
10,930
$
14,430
New mortgage loans
—
(d)
500
(d)
7,307
(d)
Deductions during the year:
Collections of principal
(4,142
)
(2,319
)
(10,807
)
Foreclosures
(3,269
)
(450
)
—
Balance at the close of year
$
1,250
$
8,661
$
10,930
(b)
Interest only payments are due monthly. Principal is due at maturity.
(c)
Mortgages held by NNN and its subsidiaries for federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were
$1,250
,
$8,661
, and
$10,930
, respectively.
(d)
Mortgages totaling
$500
and
$7,307
, were accepted in connection with real estate transactions for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.