NNN REIT
NNN
#2358
Rank
$7.92 B
Marketcap
$41.75
Share price
0.72%
Change (1 day)
9.72%
Change (1 year)

NNN REIT - 10-K annual report


Text size:
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from                      to                    .

Commission file number 001-11290

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Maryland 56-1431377

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

450 South Orange Avenue, Suite 900

Orlando, Florida 32801

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (407) 265-7348

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class: Name of exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange
7.375% Series C Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  x Accelerated filer  ¨ Non-accelerated filer  ¨ Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2008 was $72,845,557.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 24, 2009 was 79,007,637.


Table of Contents

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Registrant incorporates by reference into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K portions of National Retail Properties, Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

  

PAGE      

REFERENCE

Part I

   
 

Item 1.

 Business  1
 

Item 1A.

 Risk Factors  8
 

Item 1B.

 Unresolved Staff Comments  18
 

Item 2.

 Properties  18
 

Item 3.

 Legal Proceedings  18
 

Item 4.

 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  18

Part II

   
 

Item 5.

 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities  19
 

Item 6.

 Selected Financial Data  21
 

Item 7.

 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  23
 

Item 7A.

 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  45
 

Item 8.

 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  46
 

Item 9.

 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure  87
 

Item 9A.

 Controls and Procedures  87
 

Item 9B.

 Other Information  89

Part III

   
 

Item 10.

 Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance  90
 

Item 11.

 Executive Compensation  90
 

Item 12.

 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  90
 

Item 13.

 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence  90
 

Item 14.

 Principal Accountant Fees and Services  90

Part IV

   
 

Item 15.

 Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules   91

Signatures

  96


Table of Contents

PART I

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the terms “registrant” or “NNN” or the “Company” refer to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust (“REIT”) subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

Statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K, including the documents that are incorporated by reference, that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Also, when NNN uses any of the words “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” or similar expressions, NNN is making forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon present expectations and reasonable assumptions, NNN’s actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those NNN anticipates or projects are described in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any document incorporated herein by reference. NNN undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1.  Business

The Company

NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated REIT formed in 1984. NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets and mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments) (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). The Inventory Assets are operated in the TRS.

Real Estate Assets

NNN acquires, owns, invests in, manages and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2008, NNN owned 1,005 Investment Properties, with an aggregate leasable area of 11,251,000 square feet, located in 44 states. Approximately 97 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio was leased at December 31, 2008. The TRS, directly and indirectly, through investment interests, acquires and/or develops real estate primarily for the purpose of resale (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2008, the TRS owned 32 Inventory Properties.

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate

Crow Holdings.  In September 2007, NNN entered into a joint venture, NNN Retail Properties Fund I LLC (the “NNN Crow JV”), with an affiliate of Crow Holdings Realty Partners IV, L.P. NNN Crow JV owns real estate assets leased to convenience store operators from unrelated third parties.

 

1


Table of Contents

Competition

NNN generally competes with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors, including but not limited to, insurance companies, pension funds and financial institutions, that own, manage, finance or develop retail and net leased properties.

Employees

As of January 31, 2009, NNN employed 59 full-time associates including executive and administrative personnel.

NNN’s executive offices are located at 450 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 900, Orlando, Florida 32801, and its telephone number is (407) 265-7348. NNN has an Internet website at www.nnnreit.com where NNN’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) can be downloaded free of charge. The common shares of National Retail Properties, Inc. are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), under the ticker symbol “NNN.”

Business Strategies and Policies

The following is a discussion of NNN’s operating strategy and certain of its investment, financing and other policies. These strategies and policies have been set by management and/or the Board of Directors and, in general, may be amended or revised from time to time by management and/or the Board of Directors without a vote of NNN’s stockholders.

Operating Strategies

NNN’s strategy is to invest primarily in retail real estate that is typically located along high-traffic commercial corridors near areas of commercial and residential density. Management believes that these types of properties, generally pursuant to triple-net leases, provide attractive opportunities for a stable current return and the potential for increased current returns and capital appreciation. Triple-net leases typically require the tenant to pay property operating expenses such as real estate taxes, assessments and other government charges, insurance, utilities, and repairs and maintenance. Initial lease terms are generally 15 to 20 years.

In some cases, NNN’s investment in real estate is in the form of mortgages, structured finance investments or other loans which may be secured by real estate, a borrower’s pledge of ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets. These investments may be subordinated to senior loans secured by other loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans.

NNN holds investment real estate assets until it determines that the sale of such a property is advantageous in view of NNN’s investment objectives. In deciding whether to sell a real estate investment asset, NNN may consider factors such as potential capital appreciation, net cash flow, tenant credit quality, market lease rates, potential use of sale proceeds and federal income tax considerations.

NNN acquires and/or develops inventory real estate assets primarily for the purpose of resale.

 

2


Table of Contents

NNN’s management team considers certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN may include items such as: the composition of NNN’s Investment Portfolio (including but not limited to tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of NNN’s Investment Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios, profitability measures, industry trends and performance of competitors compared to that of NNN.

The operating strategies employed by NNN have allowed it to increase the annual dividends (paid quarterly) per common share for 19 consecutive years.

Investment in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate

NNN’s management believes that single tenant, freestanding net lease retail properties will continue to be attractive investment opportunities and that NNN is well suited to take advantage of these opportunities because of its experience in accessing capital markets, ability to underwrite and acquire properties, and because of management’s experience in seeking out, identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions.

In evaluating a particular acquisition, management may consider a variety of factors, including:

 

  

the location, visibility and accessibility of the property,

 

  

the geographic area and demographic characteristics of the community, as well as the local real estate market, including potential for growth, market rents, and existing or potential competing properties or retailers,

 

  

the size of the property,

 

  

the purchase price,

 

  

the non-financial terms of the proposed acquisition,

 

  

the availability of funds or other consideration for the proposed acquisition and the cost thereof,

 

  

the compatibility of the property with NNN’s existing portfolio,

 

  

the potential for, and current extent of, any environmental problems,

 

  

the quality of construction and design and the current physical condition of the property,

 

  

the financial and other characteristics of the existing tenant,

 

  

the tenant’s business plan, operating history and management team,

 

  

the tenant’s industry,

 

  

the terms of any existing leases, and

 

  

the rent to be paid by the tenant.

NNN intends to engage in future investment activities in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of its status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and that will not make NNN an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Equity investments in acquired properties may be subject to existing mortgage financings and other indebtedness or to new indebtedness which may be incurred in connection with acquiring or refinancing these investments.

 

3


Table of Contents

Investments in Real Estate Mortgages, Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, and Securities of or Interests in Persons Engaged in Real Estate Activities

While NNN’s primary business objectives and current portfolio ownership primarily emphasize retail properties, NNN may invest in (i) a wide variety of property types and tenant types, (ii) leases, mortgages, commercial mortgage residual interests and other types of real estate interests, (iii) loans secured by personal property, (iv) loans secured by membership interests, or (v) securities of other REITs, other entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities. For example, NNN from time to time has made investments in mortgage loans or held mortgages on properties that NNN has sold and has made structured finance investments and other loans related to properties acquired or sold.

Financing Strategy

NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategies while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to its stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.

NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional retail properties with cash from its $400,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). As of December 31, 2008, $26,500,000 was outstanding and approximately $373,500,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $1,265,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, NNN’s ratio of total liabilities to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation) was approximately 40 percent and the secured indebtedness to total gross assets was approximately one percent. The total debt to total market capitalization was approximately 43 percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances.

NNN anticipates it will be able to obtain additional financing for short-term and long-term liquidity requirements as further described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity.” However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.

The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy at any time. NNN has not engaged in trading, underwriting or agency distribution or sale of securities of other issues and does not intend to do so.

Strategies and Policy Changes

Any of NNN’s strategies or policies described above may be changed at any time by NNN without notice to or a vote of NNN’s stockholders.

 

4


Table of Contents

Investment Properties

As of December 31, 2008, NNN owned 1,005 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 11,251,000 square feet, located in 44 states. Approximately 97 percent of the gross leasable area was leased at December 31, 2008. Reference is made to the Schedule of Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization filed with this report for a listing of NNN’s Investment Properties and their respective carrying costs.

The following table summarizes NNN’s Investment Properties as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):

 

   Size(1)  Cost(2)
   High  Low  Average  High  Low  Average

Land

  2,223  7  111  $    8,882  $    25  $    1,097

Building

  135  1  12   17,049   44   1,721

(1)     Approximate square feet.

(2)     Costs vary depending upon size and local demographic factors.

 

In connection with the development of 21 Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction and land costs) of $97,690,000. As of December 31, 2008, NNN has funded $70,451,000 of this commitment, with $27,239,000 remaining to be funded.

As of December 31, 2008, NNN does not have any tenant that accounts for ten percent or more of its rental income.

Leases.  Although there are variations in the specific terms of the leases, the following is a summary of the general structure of NNN’s leases. Generally, the leases of the Investment Properties provide for initial terms of 15 to 20 years. As of December 31, 2008, the weighted average remaining lease term was approximately 13 years. The Investment Properties are generally leased under net leases pursuant to which the tenant typically will bear responsibility for substantially all property costs and expenses associated with ongoing maintenance and operation, including utilities, property taxes and insurance. In addition, the majority of NNN’s leases provide that the tenant is responsible for roof and structural repairs. The leases of the Investment Properties provide for annual base rental payments (payable in monthly installments) ranging from $8,000 to $2,160,000 (average of $222,000). Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume.

Generally, the Investment Property leases provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions as the initial lease. Some of the leases also provide that in the event NNN wishes to sell the Investment Property subject to that lease, NNN first must offer the lessee the right to purchase the Investment Property on the same terms and conditions as any offer which NNN intends to accept for the sale of the Investment Property.

Certain Investment Properties have leases that provide the tenant with a purchase option to acquire the Investment Property from NNN. The purchase price calculations are generally stated in the lease agreement or are based on the current market value at the time of exercise.

 

5


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of NNN’s Investment Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of December 31, 2008:

 

   % of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
  # of
Properties
  Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
     % of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
  # of
Properties
  Gross
Leasable
Area(2)

2009

  1.0%  20  386,000  2015  2.5%  19  463,000

2010

  2.8%  40  405,000  2016  1.9%  15  287,000

2011

  2.0%  20  333,000  2017  4.4%  26  751,000

2012

  3.5%  34  525,000  2018  2.9%  24  418,000

2013

  4.5%  38  842,000  Thereafter  70.3%  700  5,795,000

2014

  4.2%  36  523,000        

(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2008.

(2)     Approximate square feet.

The following table summarizes the diversification of trade of NNN’s Investment Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:

 

      % of Annual Base Rent(1)
   

Top 10 Lines of Trade

  2008  2007  2006

1.

  Convenience Stores  25.7%  23.9%  16.3%

2.

  Automotive Service  8.9%  5.2%  0.2%

3.

  Restaurant – Full Service  8.7%  10.3%  12.1%

4.

  Theaters  6.1%  4.2%  -

5.

  Automotive Parts  5.1%  4.9%  1.6%

6.

  Drug Stores  4.0%  5.0%  8.3%

7.

  Books  4.0%  4.4%  5.7%

8.

  Restaurants – Limited Service  3.3%  3.7%  4.7%

9.

  Sporting Goods  3.3%  3.9%  7.3%

10.

  Consumer Electronics  3.2%  4.3%  5.6%
  Other            27.7%            30.2%            38.2%
           
    100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
           

(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.

The following table shows the top 10 states in which NNN’s Investment Properties are located as of December 31, 2008:

 

    

State

  # of
Properties
  % of
Annual
Base Rent(1)

1.

  Texas  211  19.9%

2.

  Florida  84  9.8%

3.

  Illinois  39  6.6%

4.

  North Carolina  62  6.1%

5.

  California  26  5.2%

6.

  Georgia  57  5.1%

7.

  Pennsylvania  80  4.2%

8.

  Indiana  37  4.2%

9.

  Ohio  31  3.1%

10.

  Tennessee  30  3.1%
  Other  348                  32.7%
        
    1,005  100.0%
        

(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2008.

 

6


Table of Contents

Mortgages and Notes Receivable

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, mortgages and notes receivable, excluding structured finance investments, had an aggregate outstanding principal balance of $55,495,000 and $58,556,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, the mortgages and notes receivable bear interest rates ranging from 7.00% to 11.50% with maturity dates ranging from January 2009 through October 2028. Mortgages receivable are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets.

As of December 31, 2008, and 2007, the outstanding principal balance of the structured finance investments was $4,514,000 and $14,359,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, the structured finance investments bear a weighted average interest rate of 11.36% per annum, of which 10.00% is payable monthly and the remaining 1.36% accrues and is due at maturity. The principal balance of each structured finance investment is due in full at maturity in April 2009. The structured finance investments are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate.

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests

Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”), a majority owned and consolidated subsidiary of NNN, holds the residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven commercial real estate loan securitizations. Each of the Residuals is reported at fair value based upon an independent valuation; unrealized gains or losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity, and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. The Residuals had an estimated fair value of $22,000,000 at December 31, 2008.

Inventory Assets

The NNN Inventory Portfolio, which is owned by the TRS, is comprised of two components: land for development (“Development Properties” or “Development Portfolio”) and improved properties (“Exchange Properties” or “Exchange Portfolio”). NNN’s Inventory Portfolio is held with the intent to sell the properties to purchasers who are looking for replacement like-kind exchange property or to other purchasers with different investment objectives. As of December 31, 2008, the TRS owned 19 Development Properties (11 completed, one under construction and seven land parcels) and 13 Exchange Properties. See the Schedule of Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization filed with this report for a listing of the Inventory Properties and their respective carrying costs.

The following table summarizes the 11 completed Development Properties and 13 Exchange Properties as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):

 

   Size(1)  Cost(2)
   High  Low  Average  High  Low  Average

Completed Development Properties:

            

    Land

  527  15  $      128  $      8,959  $      247  $      1,787

    Building

  218  1   27   28,803   369   4,244

Exchange Properties:

            

    Land

  110  11  $29  $1,729  $121  $465

    Building

  23  2   7   3,367   184   970

(1)     Approximate square feet.

(2)     Costs vary depending upon size and local demographic factors.

 

7


Table of Contents

Under Construction.  In connection with the development of one Inventory Property, NNN has agreed to fund total construction commitments (including construction and land costs) of $4,814,000. As of December 31, 2008, NNN has funded $2,212,000 of this commitment, with $2,602,000 remaining to be funded.

Governmental Regulations Affecting Properties

Property Environmental Considerations.  Subject to a determination of the level of risk and potential cost of remediation, NNN may acquire a property where some level of contamination may exist. Investments in real property create a potential for substantial environmental liability on the part of the owner of such property from the presence or discharge of hazardous substances on the property or the improper disposal of hazardous substances emanating from the property, regardless of fault. As a part of its acquisition due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each property. In such cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the problem, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance to address environmental conditions at the property.

NNN has 70 Investment Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation. In general, the seller, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Investment Properties.

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.  The Investment and Inventory Properties, as commercial facilities, are required to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”). Investigation of a property may reveal non-compliance with the ADA. The tenants will typically have primary responsibility for complying with the ADA, but NNN may incur costs if the tenant does not comply. As of February 15, 2009, NNN has not been notified by any governmental authority of, nor is NNN’s management aware of, any non-compliance with the ADA that NNN’s management believes would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position or results of operations.

Other Regulations.  State and local fire, life-safety and similar requirements regulate the use of NNN’s Investment and Inventory Properties. The leases generally require that each tenant will have primary responsibility for complying with regulations, but failure to comply could result in fines by governmental authorities, awards of damages to private litigants, or restrictions on the ability to conduct business on such properties.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Carefully consider the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. If any of the events or developments described below were actually to occur, NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

8


Table of Contents

The global financial crisis and economic slowdown may have an adverse impact on NNN’s industry, business, its tenants’ business and NNN’s results of operations.

The continuation or worsening of the current credit crisis and global economic crisis could have an adverse effect on the fundamentals of NNN’s business and results of operations, including overall market occupancy and rental rates. These current economic conditions could have a negative effect on the financial condition of NNN’s tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or on the institutions that hold NNN’s cash balances and short-term investments, which may expose NNN to increased risks of default by these parties.

With this disruption in the economy and capital markets, there can be no assurance NNN will not experience material adverse effects on its business, financial condition, results of operations or real estate values.

There can be no assurance that actions of the United States Government, Federal Reserve or other government and regulatory bodies for the reported purpose of stabilizing the economy or financial markets will achieve their intended effect. Additionally, some of these actions may adversely affect financial institutions, capital providers, retailers, consumers or NNN’s financial condition, results of operations or the trading price of NNN’s shares.

Potential consequences of the current credit crisis and global economic slowdown include:

 

  

the financial condition of NNN’s tenants, which operate in the retail industry and some of which have recently filed for bankruptcy protection, may be adversely affected, which may result in tenant defaults under the leases due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failures or for other reasons;

 

  

the ability to borrow on terms and conditions that NNN finds acceptable, or at all, may be limited, which could reduce NNN’s ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt, reduce NNN’s returns from acquisition and development activities and increase NNN’s future interest expense;

 

  

reduced values of NNN’s properties may limit NNN’s ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices and may reduce the availability of unsecured loans;

 

  

the value and liquidity of NNN’s short-term investments and cash deposits could be reduced as a result of a deterioration of the financial condition of the institutions that hold NNN’s cash deposits or the institutions or assets in which NNN has made short-term investments, the dislocation of the markets for NNN’s short-term investments, increased volatility in market rates for such investments or other factors; and

 

  

one or more lenders under the Credit Facility could fail and NNN may not be able to replace the financing commitment of any such lenders on favorable terms, or at all.

NNN may be unable to obtain debt or equity capital on favorable terms, if at all.

NNN may be unable to obtain capital on favorable terms, if at all, to further its business objectives or meet its existing obligations. Debt and equity capital availability in the real estate market is severely strained. Nearly all of NNN’s debt, including the Credit Facility, is subject to balloon principal payments due at maturity. These maturities begin as soon as May 2010 and extend to October 2017. The ability of NNN to make these scheduled principal payments may be adversely impacted by NNN’s inability to extend or refinance the Credit Facility, the inability to dispose of assets at an attractive

 

9


Table of Contents

price or the inability to obtain additional debt or equity capital. Capital that may be available may be materially more expensive or available under terms that are materially more restrictive than NNN’s existing capital which would have an adverse impact on NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Loss of revenues from tenants would reduce NNN’s cash flow.

NNN’s five largest tenants accounted for an aggregate of approximately 28 percent of NNN’s annual base rent as of December 31, 2008. The default, financial distress, bankruptcy or liquidation of one or more of NNN’s tenants could cause substantial vacancies among NNN’s Investment Portfolio. Vacancies reduce NNN’s revenues, increase property expenses and could decrease the ultimate sale value of each such vacant property. Upon the expiration of the leases that are currently in place, the tenant may not be able to renew the lease or, NNN may not be able to re-lease the vacant property at a comparable lease rate or without incurring additional expenditures in connection with such renewal or re-leasing.

A significant portion of the source of NNN’s annual base rent is heavily concentrated in specific industry classifications and in specific geographic locations.

As of December 31, 2008, an aggregate of approximately 38 percent of NNN’s annual base rent is generated from two retail lines of trade, convenience stores (26 percent) and restaurants (12 percent). In addition, as of December 31, 2008, an aggregate of approximately 30 percent of NNN’s annual base rent is generated from properties in Texas (20 percent) and Florida (10 percent). Any financial hardship and/or changes in these industries or states could have an adverse effect on NNN’s results of operations.

Owning real estate and indirect interests in real estate carries inherent risks.

NNN’s economic performance and the value of its real estate assets are subject to the risk that if NNN’s properties do not generate revenues sufficient to meet its operating expenses, including debt service, NNN’s cash flow and ability to pay distributions to its shareholders will be adversely affected. As a real estate company, NNN is susceptible to the following real estate industry risks, which are beyond its control:

 

  

changes in national, regional and local economic conditions and outlook,

 

  

decreases in consumer spending and retail sales,

 

  

economic downturns in the areas where NNN’s properties are located,

 

  

adverse changes in local real estate market conditions, such as an oversupply, reduction in demand or intense competition for tenants,

 

  

changes in tenant preferences that reduce the attractiveness of NNN’s properties to tenants,

 

  

zoning, regulatory restrictions, or change in taxes, and

 

  

changes in interest rates or availability of financing.

All of these factors could result in decreases in market rental rates and increases in vacancy rates, which could adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.

 

10


Table of Contents

NNN’s real estate investments are illiquid.

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, NNN’s ability to adjust the portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions is limited. Certain significant expenditures generally do not change in response to economic or other conditions, including: (i) debt service (if any), (ii) real estate taxes, and (iii) operating and maintenance costs. This combination of variable revenue and relatively fixed expenditures may result, under certain market conditions, in reduced earnings and could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.

NNN may be subject to known or unknown environmental liabilities.

Subject to a determination of the level of risk and potential cost of remediation, NNN may acquire a property where some level of contamination may exist. Investments in real property create a potential for substantial environmental liability on the part of the owner of such property from the presence or discharge of hazardous substances on the property or the improper disposal of hazardous substances emanating from the property, regardless of fault. As a part of its acquisition due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each property. In such cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the problem, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance to address environmental conditions at the property.

NNN has 70 Investment Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation. In general, the seller, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Investment Properties. In the event of a bankruptcy or other inability on the part of these parties to cover these costs, NNN may have to cover the costs of remediation, fines or other environmental liabilities at these and other properties and may have liability to third parties. NNN may also own properties where required remediation has not begun or adverse environmental conditions have not yet been detected. This may require remediation or otherwise subject NNN to liability including liability to third parties. NNN cannot assure that (i) it will not be required to undertake or pay for removal or remediation of any contamination of the properties currently or previously owned by NNN, (ii) NNN will not be subject to fines by governmental authorities or litigation, (iii) NNN will not be subject to litigation by and liability to third parties, or (iv) the costs of such removal, remediation fines, third party liability, or litigation would not be material.

NNN may not be able to successfully execute its acquisition or development strategies.

NNN cannot assure that it will be able to implement its investment strategies successfully. Additionally, NNN cannot assure that its property portfolio will expand at all, or if it will expand at any specified rate or to any specified size. In addition, investment in additional real estate assets is subject to a number of risks. Because NNN expects to invest in markets other than the ones in which its current properties are located or properties which may be leased to tenants other than those to which NNN has historically leased properties, NNN will also be subject to the risks associated with investment in new markets or with new tenants that may be relatively unfamiliar to NNN’s management team.

NNN’s development activities are subject to, without limitation, risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory approvals, the cost and timely completion of construction (including risks from factors beyond NNN’s control, such as weather or labor conditions or material

 

11


Table of Contents

shortages), the risk of finding tenants for the properties and the ability to obtain both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken or provide a tenant the opportunity to terminate a lease. Any of these situations may delay or eliminate proceeds or cash flows NNN expects from these projects, which could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.

NNN may not be able to dispose of properties consistent with its operating strategy.

NNN may be unable to sell properties targeted for disposition (including its Inventory Properties) due to adverse market conditions. This may adversely affect, among other things, NNN’s ability to sell under favorable terms, execute its operating strategy, achieve target earnings or returns, retire or repay debt or pay dividends.

A change in the assumptions used to determine the value of commercial mortgage residual interests could adversely affect NNN’s financial position.

As of December 31, 2008, the Residuals had a carrying value of $22,000,000. The value of these Residuals is based on discount rate, loan loss, prepayment speed and interest rate assumptions made by NNN to determine their value. If actual experience differs materially from these assumptions, the actual future cash flow could be less than expected and the value of the Residuals, as well as NNN’s earnings, could decline.

NNN may suffer a loss in the event of a default or bankruptcy of a borrower.

If a borrower defaults on a mortgage, structured finance loan or other loan made by NNN, and does not have sufficient assets to satisfy the loan, NNN may suffer a loss of principal and interest. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN may not be able to recover against all or any of the assets of the borrower, or the assets of the borrower may not be sufficient to satisfy the balance due on the loan. In addition, certain of NNN’s loans may be subordinate to other debt of a borrower. These investments are typically loans secured by a borrower’s pledge of its ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets. These agreements are typically subordinated to senior loans secured by other loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans. As of December 31, 2008, mortgages and notes receivables (including structured finance investments) had an outstanding principal balance of $60,009,000. If a borrower defaults on the debt senior to NNN’s loan, or in the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN’s loan will be satisfied only after the borrower’s senior creditors’ claims are satisfied. Where debt senior to NNN’s loans exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit NNN’s ability to amend loan documents, assign the loans, accept prepayments, exercise remedies and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. Bankruptcy proceedings and litigation can significantly increase the time needed for NNN to acquire underlying collateral, if any, in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value. In addition, there are significant costs and delays associated with the foreclosure process.

 

12


Table of Contents

Certain provisions of NNN’s leases or loan agreements may be unenforceable.

NNN’s rights and obligations with respect to its leases, structured finance loans, mortgage loans or other loans are governed by written agreements. A court could determine that one or more provisions of such an agreement are unenforceable, such as a particular remedy, a loan prepayment provision or a provision governing NNN’s security interest in the underlying collateral of a borrower or lessee. NNN could be adversely impacted if this were to happen with respect to an asset or group of assets.

Property ownership through joint ventures and partnerships could limit NNN’s control of those investments.

Joint ventures or partnerships involve risks not otherwise present for direct investments by NNN. It is possible that NNN’s co-venturers or partners may have different interests or goals than NNN at any time and they may take actions contrary to NNN’s requests, policies or objectives, including NNN’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. Other risks of joint venture or partnership investments include impasses on decisions because in some instances no single co-venturer or partner has full control over the joint venture or partnership, respectively. Additionally, the co-venturer or partner may become insolvent, bankrupt or otherwise unable to contribute to the joint venture or partnership, respectively.

Competition with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors may impede NNN’s ability to grow.

NNN may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to complete suitable property acquisitions or developments on advantageous terms due to competition for such properties with others engaged in real estate investment activities. NNN’s inability to successfully acquire or develop new properties may affect NNN’s ability to achieve anticipated return on investment or realize its investment strategy, which could have an adverse effect on its results of operations.

Uninsured losses may adversely affect NNN’s ability to pay outstanding indebtedness.

NNN’s properties are generally covered by comprehensive liability, fire, flood, and extended insurance coverage. NNN believes that the insurance carried on its properties is adequate in accordance with industry standards. There are, however, types of losses (such as from hurricanes, wars or earthquakes) which may be uninsurable, or the cost of insuring against these losses may not be economically justifiable. If an uninsured loss occurs or a loss exceeds policy limits, NNN could lose both its invested capital and anticipated revenues from the property, thereby reducing NNN’s cash flow.

Acts of violence, terrorist attacks or war may affect the markets in which NNN operates and NNN’s results of operations.

Terrorist attacks or other acts of violence may negatively affect NNN’s operations. There can be no assurance that there will not be terrorist attacks against businesses within the United States. These attacks may directly impact NNN’s physical facilities or the businesses or the financial condition of its tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or financial institutions with which NNN has a relationship. The United States is engaged in armed conflict, which could have an impact on these parties. The consequences of armed conflict are unpredictable, and NNN may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on its business.

 

13


Table of Contents

More generally, any of these events or threats of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and worldwide financial markets and economies. They also could result in, or cause a deepening of, economic recession in the United States or abroad. Any of these occurrences could have an adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition or results of operations.

Vacant properties or bankrupt tenants could adversely affect NNN’s business or financial condition.

As of December 31, 2008, NNN owned 31 vacant, unleased Investment Properties and two vacant land parcels, which accounted for approximately three percent of total Investment Properties. NNN is actively marketing these properties for sale or lease but may not be able to sell or lease these properties on favorable terms or at all. The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from the rejection by any bankrupt tenant of any of their respective leases with NNN could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations of NNN if NNN is unable to re-lease the Investment Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of December 31, 2008, approximately two percent of the total gross leasable area of NNN’s Investment Portfolio is leased to two tenants that have filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result, these tenants have the right to reject or affirm their lease with NNN. NNN anticipates the number of vacancies and bankrupt tenants will increase.

The amount of debt NNN has and the restrictions imposed by that debt could adversely affect NNN’s business and financial condition.

As of December 31, 2008, NNN had total mortgage debt and secured notes payable outstanding of approximately $26,290,000, total unsecured notes payable of $1,000,014,000 and $26,500,000 outstanding on the Credit Facility. NNN’s organizational documents do not limit the level or amount of debt that it may incur. If NNN incurs additional indebtedness and permits a higher degree of leverage, debt service requirements would increase and could adversely affect NNN’s financial condition and results of operations, as well as NNN’s ability to pay principal and interest on the outstanding indebtedness or cash dividends to its stockholders. In addition, increased leverage could increase the risk that NNN may default on its debt obligations. The Credit Facility contains financial covenants that could limit the amount of distributions to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders.

The amount of debt outstanding at any time could have important consequences to NNN’s stockholders. For example, it could:

 

  

require NNN to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, real estate investments and other appropriate business opportunities that may arise in the future,

 

  

increase NNN’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions,

 

  

limit NNN’s ability to obtain any additional financing it may need in the future for working capital, debt refinancing, capital expenditures, real estate investments, development or other general corporate purposes,

 

  

make it difficult to satisfy NNN’s debt service requirements,

 

  

limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends in cash on its outstanding common and preferred stock,

 

14


Table of Contents
  

limit NNN’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the factors that affect the profitability of its business, and

 

  

limit NNN’s flexibility in conducting its business, which may place NNN at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt or debt with less restrictive terms.

NNN’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal or interest on its debt, or to retire or refinance such debt will depend primarily on its future performance, which to a certain extent is subject to the creditworthiness of its tenants, competition, and economic, financial, and other factors beyond its control. There can be no assurance that NNN’s business will continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service its debt or meet its other cash needs. If NNN is unable to generate sufficient cash flow from its business, it may be required to refinance all or a portion of its existing debt, sell assets or obtain additional financing to meet its debt obligations and other cash needs.

NNN cannot assure stockholders that any such refinancing, sale of assets or additional financing would be possible or, if possible, on terms and conditions, including but not limited to the interest rate, which NNN would find acceptable or would not result in a material decline in earnings.

NNN is obligated to comply with financial and other covenants in its debt that could restrict its operating activities, and the failure to comply with such covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt.

NNN’s unsecured debt contains various restrictive covenants which include, among others, provisions restricting NNN’s ability to:

 

  

incur or guarantee additional debt,

 

  

make certain distributions, investments and other restricted payments, including dividend payments on its outstanding common and preferred stock,

 

  

limit the ability of restricted subsidiaries to make payments to NNN,

 

  

enter into transactions with certain affiliates,

 

  

create certain liens,

 

  

consolidate, merge or sell NNN’s assets, and

 

  

pre-pay debt.

NNN’s secured debt generally contains customary covenants, including, among others, provisions:

 

  

relating to the maintenance of the property securing the debt,

 

  

restricting its ability to sell, assign or further encumber the properties securing the debt,

 

  

restricting its ability to incur additional debt,

 

  

restricting its ability to amend or modify existing leases, and

 

  

relating to certain prepayment restrictions.

NNN’s ability to meet some of its debt covenants, including covenants related to the condition of the property or payment of real estate taxes, may be dependent on the performance by NNN’s tenants under their leases.

 

15


Table of Contents

In addition, certain covenants in NNN’s debt, including its Credit Facility, require NNN, among other things, to:

 

  

limit certain leverage ratios,

 

  

maintain certain minimum interest and debt service coverage ratios,

 

  

limit dividends declared and paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders, and

 

  

limit investments in certain types of assets.

The market value of NNN’s equity and debt securities is subject to various factors that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility.

As with other publicly traded securities, the market price of NNN’s equity and debt securities depends on various factors, which may change from time-to-time and/or may be unrelated to NNN’s financial condition, operating performance or prospects that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility in such prices. These factors include among many:

 

  

general economic and financial market conditions including the current global economic downturn,

 

  

level and trend of interest rates,

 

  

NNN’s ability to access the capital markets to raise additional capital,

 

  

the issuance of additional equity or debt securities,

 

  

changes in NNN’s FFO or earnings estimates,

 

  

changes in NNN’s debt ratings or analyst ratings,

 

  

NNN’s financial condition and performance,

 

  

market perception of NNN compared to other REITs, and

 

  

market perception of REITs compared to other investment sectors.

NNN’s failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes could result in significant tax liability.

NNN intends to operate in a manner that will allow NNN to continue to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”). NNN believes it has been organized as, and its past and present operations qualify NNN as a REIT. However, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) could successfully assert that NNN is not qualified as such. In addition, NNN may not remain qualified as a REIT in the future. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex Internal Revenue Code provisions for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within NNN’s control. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for NNN to qualify as a REIT.

If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT, it would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to stockholders in computing taxable income and would become subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. In this event, NNN could be subject to potentially significant tax liabilities and penalties. Unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, NNN would also be disqualified

 

16


Table of Contents

from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the qualification was lost. Even if NNN maintains its REIT status, NNN may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and property.

Even if NNN remains qualified as a REIT, NNN may face other tax liabilities that reduce operating results and cash flow.

Even if NNN remains qualified for taxation as a REIT, NNN may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes, such as mortgage recording taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease earnings and cash available for distribution to stockholders. In addition, in order to meet the REIT qualification requirements, NNN holds some of its assets through the TRS.

Adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes could reduce NNN’s earnings, cash flow and market price of NNN’s common stock.

At any time, the federal and state income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may change. Any such changes may have retroactive effect, and could adversely affect NNN or its stockholders. For example, legislation enacted in 2003 and extended in 2006 generally reduced the federal income tax rate on most dividends paid by corporations to individual investors to a maximum of 15 percent (through 2010). REIT dividends, with limited exceptions, will not benefit from the rate reduction, because a REIT’s income generally is not subject to corporate level tax. As such, this legislation could cause shares in non-REIT corporations to be a more attractive investment to individual investors than shares in REITs, and could have an adverse effect on the value of NNN’s common stock.

Compliance with REIT requirements, including distribution requirements, may limit NNN’s flexibility and negatively affect NNN’s operating decisions.

To maintain its status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, NNN must meet certain requirements on an on-going basis, including requirements regarding its sources of income, the nature and diversification of its assets, the amounts NNN distributes to its stockholders and the ownership of its shares. NNN may also be required to make distributions to its stockholders when it does not have funds readily available for distribution or at times when NNN’s funds are otherwise needed to fund capital expenditures or to fund debt service requirements. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, providing it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.

Changes in accounting pronouncements could adversely impact NNN’s reported financial performance.

Accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how NNN records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. From time to time the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the Commission, who create and interpret appropriate accounting standards, may change the financial accounting and reporting standards or their interpretation and application of these

 

17


Table of Contents

standards that govern the preparation of NNN’s financial statements. These changes could have a material impact on NNN’s reported financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, NNN could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in restating prior period financial statements.

NNN’s failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results and share price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. If NNN fails to maintain the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting, as such standards may be modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, the Company may not be able to ensure that it can conclude on an ongoing basis that it has effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Moreover, effective internal control over financial reporting, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for the Company to produce reliable financial reports and to maintain its qualification as a REIT and are important in helping to prevent financial fraud. If NNN cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its business and operating results could be harmed, REIT qualification could be jeopardized, investors could lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information, and the trading price of NNN’s shares could drop significantly.

NNN’s ability to pay dividends in the future is subject to many factors.

NNN’s ability to pay dividends may be impaired if any of the risks described in this section were to occur. In addition, payment of NNN’s dividends depends upon NNN’s earnings, financial condition, maintenance of NNN’s REIT status and other factors as NNN’s Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.  Properties

Please refer to Item 1. “Business.”

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various legal actions that management believes is routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Item 4.  Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

 

18


Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The common stock of NNN currently is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “NNN.” Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on NNN’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity Index (“NAREIT”) and the S&P 500 Index (“S&P 500”) for the five year period commencing December 31, 2003 and ending December 31, 2008. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2003.

LOGO

 

19


Table of Contents

For each calendar quarter indicated, the following table reflects respective high, low and closing sales prices for the common stock as quoted by the NYSE and the dividends paid per share in each such period.

 

2008  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Year

High

  $    23.66  $    24.00  $    24.57  $    23.66  $    24.57

Low

   19.63   20.75   19.60   10.53   10.53

Close

   22.05   20.90   23.95   17.19   17.19

Dividends paid per share

   0.355   0.375   0.375   0.375   1.480

2007

          

High

  $    25.950  $    25.450  $    24.580  $    26.150  $    26.150

Low

   22.390   21.760   20.200   22.480   20.200

Close

   24.190   21.860   24.380   23.380   23.380

Dividends paid per share

   0.335   0.355   0.355   0.355   1.400

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

 

    2008  2007

Ordinary dividends

  $1.480000  100.0000%  $1.397402  99.8144%

Qualified dividends

   -  -   0.000414  0.0296%

Capital gain

   -  -   0.002184  0.1560%

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

   -  -   -  -
              
  $1.480000  100.0000%  $1.400000  100.0000%
              

NNN intends to pay regular quarterly dividends to its stockholders, although all future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, NNN’s financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and such other factors as the board of directors deems relevant.

In February 2009, NNN paid dividends to its stockholders of $29,313,000 or $0.375 per share of common stock.

On January 31, 2009, there were 1,593 stockholders of record of common stock.

 

20


Table of Contents

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

Historical Financial Highlights

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

       2008          2007          2006          2005          2004     

Gross revenues(1)

 $247,352  $208,629  $180,877  $151,831  $133,875 

Earnings from continuing operations

  103,730   80,906   60,021   47,160   27,571 

Net earnings

  123,082   157,110   182,505   89,400   64,934 

Total assets

  2,649,362   2,539,605   1,917,495   1,736,588   1,300,517 

Total debt

  1,052,804   1,060,070   776,737   861,045   524,241 

Total equity

  1,542,209   1,407,285   1,096,505   828,087   756,998 

Cash dividends declared to:

     

Common stockholders

  110,107   92,989   76,035   69,018   66,272 

Series A preferred stock stockholders

  -   -   4,376   4,008   4,008 

Series B convertible preferred stock stockholders

  -   -   419   1,675   1,675 

Series C preferred stock stockholders

  6,785   6,785   923   -   - 

Weighted average common shares:

     

Basic

  74,249,137   66,152,437   57,428,063   52,984,821   51,312,434 

Diluted

  74,521,909   66,407,530   58,079,875   54,640,143   51,742,518 

Per share information:

     

Earnings from continuing operations:

     

Basic

 $1.31  $1.12  $0.94  $0.78  $0.43 

Diluted

  1.30   1.11   0.94   0.80   0.46 

Net earnings:

     

Basic

  1.57   2.27   3.08   1.58   1.15 

Diluted

  1.56   2.26   3.05   1.56   1.18 

Dividends declared to:

     

Common stockholders

  1.48   1.40   1.32   1.30   1.29 

Series A preferred stock stockholders

  -   -   2.45625   2.25   2.25 

Series B convertible preferred stock stockholders

  -   -   41.875   167.50   167.50 

Series C preferred stock depositary stockholders

  1.84375   1.84375   0.250955   -   - 

Other data:

     

Cash flows provided by (used in):

     

Operating activities

 $236,748  $129,634  $1,676  $19,226  $85,800 

Investing activities

  (256,304)  (536,717)  (90,099)  (230,783)  (69,963)

Financing activities

  (5,317)  432,907   81,864   217,844   (19,225)

Funds from operations – diluted(2)

  148,284   124,113   97,121   81,803   73,065 

(1)     Gross revenues include revenues from NNN’s continuing and discontinued operations. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” NNN has classified the revenues related to (i) all Investment Properties that were sold and leasehold interest which expired, (ii) all Inventory Properties which generated revenues prior to disposition, and (iii) all Investment and Inventory Properties which generated revenue and were held for sale at December 31, 2008, as discontinued operations.

(2)     The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) developed Funds from Operations (“FFO”) as a relative non-GAAP financial measure of performance of a REIT in order to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined under GAAP. FFO is defined by NAREIT and is used by NNN as follows: net earnings (computed in accordance with GAAP) plus depreciation and amortization of assets unique to the real estate industry, excluding gains (or including losses) on the disposition of Investment Assets and NNN’s share of these items from NNN’s unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

 

21


Table of Contents

FFO is generally considered by industry analysts to be the most appropriate measure of operating performance of real estate companies. FFO does not necessarily represent cash provided by operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of NNN’s operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Management considers FFO an appropriate measure of operating performance of an equity REIT because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of the real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, and because industry analysts have accepted it as an operating performance measure. NNN’s computation of FFO may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO used by other equity REITs, and therefore, may not be comparable to such other REITs.

NNN has earnings from discontinued operations in each of its segments, investment assets and inventory assets, real estate held for investment and real estate held for sale. All property dispositions from NNN’s investment segment are classified as discontinued operations. In addition, certain properties in NNN’s inventory segment that have generated revenues before disposition are classified as discontinued operations. These inventory properties have not historically been classified as discontinued operations, therefore, prior period comparable consolidated financial statements have been restated to include these properties in its earnings from discontinued operations. These adjustments resulted in a decrease in NNN’s reported total revenues and total and per share earnings from continuing operations and an increase in NNN’s earnings from discontinued operations. However, NNN’s total and per share net earnings available to common stockholders is not affected.

The following table reconciles FFO to their most directly comparable GAAP measure, net earnings for the years ended December 31:

 

  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 

Reconciliation of funds from operations:

     

Net earnings

 $123,082  $157,110  $182,505  $89,400  $    64,934 

Real estate depreciation and amortization:

     

Continuing operations

  41,357   29,317   19,624   13,712   10,572 

Discontinued operations

  433   1,065   2,795   6,695   5,143 

Partnership/joint venture real estate depreciation

  177   31   463   606   622 

Partnership gain on sale of asset

  -   -   (262)  -   - 

Gain on disposition of equity investment

  -   -   (11,373)  -   - 

Gain on disposition of investment assets

  (9,980)  (56,625)  (91,332)  (9,816)  (2,523)

Extraordinary gain

  -   -   -   (14,786)  - 
                    

FFO

  155,069   130,898   102,420   85,811   78,748 

Series A preferred stock dividends(1)

  -   -   (4,376)  (4,008)  (4,008)

Series B convertible preferred stock dividends(1)

  -   -   (419)  (1,675)  (1,675)

Series C preferred stock dividends

  (6,785)  (6,785)  (923)  -   - 
                    

FFO available to common stockholders – basic

  148,284   124,113   96,702   80,128   73,065 

Series B convertible preferred stock dividends, if dilutive

  -   -   419   1,675   - 
                    

FFO available to common stockholders – diluted

 $148,284  $124,113  $97,121  $81,803  $73,065 
                    

(1)     The Series A and Series B preferred stock issuances are no longer outstanding.

For a discussion of material events affecting the comparability of the information reflected in the selected financial data, refer to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

22


Table of Contents

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Item 6. “Selected Financial Data,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the forward-looking disclaimer language in italics before Item 1. “Business.”

The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust (“REIT”) subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

Overview

NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets and mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments) (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). NNN acquires, owns, invests in, manages and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). The Inventory Assets are operated through the TRS. The TRS, directly and indirectly, through investment interests, primarily owns real estate generally for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). The TRS typically owns two types of properties, property for development (“Development Properties” or “Development Portfolio”) and improved properties (“Exchange Properties” or “Exchange Portfolio”).

As of December 31, 2008, NNN owned 1,005 Investment Properties, with an aggregate leasable area of 11,251,000 square feet, located in 44 states. Approximately 97 percent of total properties in NNN’s Investment Portfolio were leased at December 31, 2008. In addition, as of December 31, 2008, NNN’s Investment Assets included $60,472,000 in mortgages and notes receivable (including accrued interest receivable and structured finance investments) and $22,000,000 of commercial mortgage residual interests. As of December 31, 2008, the TRS owned 19 Development Properties (11 completed, one under construction and seven land parcels) and 13 Exchange Properties.

NNN’s management team focuses on certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN include items such as: the composition of NNN’s Investment Portfolio and structured finance investments (such as tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of NNN’s Investment Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios and profitability measures, and industry trends and performance compared to that of NNN.

NNN continues to maintain its diversification by tenant, geography and line of trade. NNN’s largest lines of trade concentration are the convenience store and restaurant sectors. These sectors represent a large part of the freestanding retail property marketplace which NNN believes represents an area of attractive investment opportunity. However, any financial hardship within these sectors could have a growing adverse effect on the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. NNN has some geographic concentration in the south and southeast which NNN believes are generally areas of above average population growth.

NNN formed a joint venture with an institutional investor in September 2007, in which NNN owns a 15 percent equity interest. The joint venture owns real estate assets leased to convenience store operators.

 

23


Table of Contents

During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, occupancy of the Investment Portfolio has averaged approximately 97 to 98 percent. The Investment Portfolio’s average remaining lease term of 13 years has remained fairly constant over the past three years which, coupled with its net lease structure, provide enhanced probability of maintaining occupancy and operating earnings.

The poor current economic environment has made it more difficult and more expensive to obtain debt and equity capital, which will likely reduce the pace of investments in new acquisitions or developments as well as the volume of dispositions. Additionally, the poor economic and retail environment will result in more retailers filing for bankruptcy, which may have an adverse impact on NNN’s occupancy.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements in conformance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and judgments on assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as other disclosures in the financial statements. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments; however, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, which in turn could have a material impact on NNN’s financial statements. A summary of NNN’s accounting policies and procedures are included in Note 1 of NNN’s consolidated financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements.

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio.  NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.

Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease.  In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”), the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases, and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values.

Real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for operating expenses relating to the property, generally including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:

Operating method – Leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rental revenue varies during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.

 

24


Table of Contents

Direct financing method  –  Leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio.  The TRS acquires and/or develops and owns properties for the purpose of resale. The properties that are classified as held for sale at any given time may consist of properties that have been acquired in the marketplace with the intent to sell and properties that have been, or are currently being, constructed by the TRS. The TRS records the acquisition of the real estate at cost, including the acquisition and closing costs. The cost of the real estate developed by the TRS also includes direct and indirect costs of construction, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. Real estate held for sale is not depreciated.

Impairment – Real Estate.  Management periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever events or changes in certain circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable through operations. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interest at Fair Value.  Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The commercial mortgage residual interests were acquired in connection with the acquisition of 78.9 percent equity interest of Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”). NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value. Certain of the commercial mortgage residual interests were pledged as security for a note payable which was repaid in February 2008.

Revenue Recognition.  Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with SFAS 13, “Accounting for Leases,” based on the terms of the lease at the time of acquisition of the leased asset. Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements.  Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Position No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (“FSP APB 14-1”) will become effective January 1, 2009, and is required to be applied retrospectively to all presented periods, as applicable. NNN estimates that the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 will result in the recognition of additional non-cash interest expense of approximately $5.5 and $2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $6.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2009.

Use of Estimates.  Additional critical accounting policies of NNN include management’s estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure

 

25


Table of Contents

of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Additional critical accounting policies include management’s estimates of the useful lives used in calculating depreciation expense relating to real estate assets, the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including the commercial mortgage residual interests, the collectibility of receivables from tenants, including accrued rental income, and capitalized overhead relating to development projects. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Results of Operations

Property Analysis – Investment Portfolio

General.  The following table summarizes NNN’s Investment Portfolio as of December 31:

 

   2008  2007  2006

Investment Properties Owned:

      

Number

  1,005  908  710

Total gross leasable area (square feet)

  11,251,000  10,610,000  9,341,000

Investment Properties Leased:

      

Number

  972  892  697

Total gross leasable area (square feet)

  10,728,000  10,355,000  9,173,000

Percent of total gross leasable area – leased

  97%  98%  98%

Weighted average remaining lease term (years)

  13  13  12

The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of NNN’s Investment Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of December 31, 2008:

 

   %
of Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
  # of
Properties
  Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
     %
of Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
  # of
Properties
  Gross
Leasable
Area(2)

2009

  1.0%  20  386,000  2015  2.5%  19  463,000

2010

  2.8%  40  405,000  2016  1.9%  15  287,000

2011

  2.0%  20  333,000  2017  4.4%  26  751,000

2012

  3.5%  34  525,000  2018  2.9%  24  418,000

2013

  4.5%  38  842,000  Thereafter  70.3%  700  5,795,000

2014

  4.2%  36  523,000        

(1)     Based on the annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2008.

(2)     Approximate square feet.

 

26


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the diversification of NNN’s Investment Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:

 

      % of Annual Base Rent(1)
   

Top 10 Lines of Trade

      2008          2007          2006    
1.  Convenience Stores  25.7%  23.9%  16.3%
2.  Automotive Service  8.9%  5.2%  0.2%
3.  Restaurant – Full Service  8.7%  10.3%  12.1%
4.  Theaters  6.1%  4.2%  -
5.  Automotive Parts  5.1%  4.9%  1.6%
6.  Drug Stores  4.0%  5.0%  8.3%
7.  Books  4.0%  4.4%  5.7%
8.  Restaurants – Limited Service  3.3%  3.7%  4.7%
9.  Sporting Goods  3.3%  3.9%  7.3%
10.  Consumer Electronics  3.2%  4.3%  5.6%
  Other  27.7%  30.2%  38.2%
           
     100.0%    100.0%    100.0% 
           
(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.

The following table shows the top 10 states in which NNN’s Investment Properties are located in as of December 31, 2008:

 

   

State

  # of
Properties
  % of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)

1.

  Texas  211  19.9%

2.

  Florida  84  9.8%

3.

  Illinois  39  6.6%

4.

  North Carolina  62  6.1%

5.

  California  26  5.2%

6.

  Georgia  57  5.1%

7.

  Pennsylvania  80  4.2%

8.

  Indiana  37  4.2%

9.

  Ohio  31  3.1%

10.

  Tennessee  30  3.1%
  Other  348  32.7%
        
            1,005  100.0%
        

(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2008.

Property Acquisitions.  The following table summarizes the Investment Properties acquired for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007  2006

Acquisitions:

      

Number of Investment Properties

   109   235   213

Gross leasable area (square feet)

   868,000       2,205,000       1,130,000

Total dollars invested(1)

  $    355,107  $696,682  $371,898

(1)     Includes dollars invested on projects under construction for each respective year.

 

27


Table of Contents

Property Dispositions.  The following table summarizes the Investment Properties sold by NNN for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007  2006

Number of properties

   19   37   30

Gross leasable area (square feet)

       290,000       997,000       1,015,000

Net sales proceeds

  $59,796  $146,041  $319,361

Net gain

  $9,980  $56,625  $91,332

Property Analysis – Inventory Portfolio

General.  The following summarizes the number of properties held for sale in the Inventory Portfolio as of December 31:

 

   2008  2007  2006

Development Portfolio:

      

Completed Inventory Properties

  11  8  11

Properties under construction

  1  9  5

Land parcels

  7  6  13
         
  19  23  29
         

Exchange Portfolio:

      

Inventory Properties

      13      33      68
         

Total Inventory Properties

  32  56  97
         

Property Acquisitions.  The following table summarizes the property acquisitions and dollars invested in the Inventory Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007  2006

Development Portfolio:

      

Number of properties acquired

   3   3   16

Dollars invested(1)

  $9,545  $64,694  $82,524

Exchange Portfolio:

      

Number of properties acquired

   4   23   77

Dollars invested

  $    19,994  $    105,152  $118,553

Total dollars invested

  $29,539  $169,846  $    201,077

(1)     Includes dollars invested on projects under construction for each respective year.

Property Dispositions.  The following table summarizes the number of Inventory Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized from the disposition of real estate held for sale included in earnings from continuing and discontinued operations for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007  2006
   # of
Properties
  Gain  # of
Properties
  Gain  # of
Properties
  Gain

Development(1)

  6  $4,751  13  $5,125  9  $            5,774

Exchange

              19   4,607              58   5,888              55   3,892
                     
  25  $9,358  71  $11,013  64  $9,666
                     

(1)     Net of minority interest.

 

28


Table of Contents

Revenue from Continuing Operations Analysis

General.  During the year ended December 31, 2008, NNN’s rental income increased primarily due to the acquisition of Investment Properties (See “Results of Operations – Property Analysis – Investment Portfolio – Property Acquisitions”). NNN anticipates any significant increase in rental income will continue to come primarily from additional property acquisitions.

The following summarizes NNN’s revenues from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):

 

        Percent of Total 2008
Versus
2007
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
 2007
Versus
2006
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
  2008 2007 2006 2008 2007 2006  

Rental Income(1)

 $  210,402 $  165,471 $   119,327 92.9% 91.5% 88.0% 27.2% 38.7%

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

  7,126  5,688  4,569 3.2% 3.1% 3.4% 25.3% 24.5%

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

  4,352  4,834  4,436 1.9% 2.7% 3.3% (10.0)% 9.0%

Interest income on
commercial mortgage residual interests

  4,636  4,882  7,268 2.0% 2.7% 5.3% (5.0)% (32.8)%
                 

Total revenues from continuing operations

 $226,516 $180,875 $  135,600 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 25.2% 33.4%
                 

(1)     Includes rental income from operating leases, earned income from direct financing leases and percentage rent from continuing operations (“Rental Income”).

Revenue from Operations by Source of Income.  NNN has identified two primary operating segments, and thus, sources of revenue: (i) earnings from NNN’s Investment Assets, and (ii) earnings from NNN’s Inventory Assets. NNN revenues from continuing operations come primarily from Investment Assets. The following table summarizes the revenues from continuing operations for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

            Percent of Total  2008
Versus
2007
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
  2007
Versus
2006
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
   2008  2007  2006  2008  2007  2006    

Investment Assets

  $213,059  $164,698  $119,146  94.1%  91.1%  87.9%  29.4%  38.2%

Inventory Assets

   13,457   16,177   16,454  5.9%  8.9%  12.1%  (16.8)%  (1.7)%
                         

Total revenues

  $  226,516  $  180,875  $  135,600  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  25.2%  33.4%
                         

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2008 to Year Ended December 31, 2007.

Rental Income.  Rental Income increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, primarily from the addition of 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet. In addition, the increase in Rental Income is also attributable to a full year of Rental Income from the 235 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 2,205,000 square feet which were acquired during the year ended December 31, 2007. The Investment Portfolio occupancy rate remained relatively stable during each of the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 with an average of approximately 97 percent and 98 percent, respectively.

 

29


Table of Contents

Real Estate Expense Reimbursements from Tenants.  Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants remained fairly consistent as a percentage of total revenues from continuing operations. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007, was attributable to a full year of reimbursements from certain tenants acquired in 2007 and the reimbursements from newly acquired properties in 2008.

Interest and Other Income from Real Estate Transactions.  Interest and other income from real estate transactions decreased for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007, primarily due to a decrease in interest income earned on the structured finance investments. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s structured finance investments was $8,614,000 and $16,795,000, respectively.

Interest Income on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests.  Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to December 31, 2007, decreased slightly as a result of lower outstanding loan balances. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest income due to the increase in the discount rate from 17% to 25% during the third quarter of 2007.

Gain from Disposition of Real Estate, Inventory Portfolio.  Inventory Properties typically are operating properties and are classified as discontinued operations. However, the gains on the sale of Inventory Properties which are sold prior to rent commencement are reported in continuing operations. The slight decrease in the gain from the disposition of real estate is solely dependent on respective sales price and cost basis of the Inventory Properties sold.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2007 to Year Ended December 31, 2006.

Rental Income.  Rental Income increased for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006, primarily from NNN’s acquisition of 235 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 2,205,000 square feet during the year ended December 31, 2007. The Investment Portfolio occupancy rate remained relatively stable at an average of approximately 98 percent for each of the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.

Real Estate Expense Reimbursements from Tenants.  Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants remained relatively consistent as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, was attributable to a full year of reimbursement from certain properties acquired in 2006 and the reimbursements from the newly acquired Investment Properties acquired in 2007.

Interest and Other Income from Real Estate Transactions.  Interest and other income from real estate transactions increased for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase in interest income on its mortgages and notes receivable. The aggregate principal balance of NNN’s mortgages and notes receivable at December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $51,556,000 and $17,227,000, respectively. The increase in interest income was partially offset by a lower weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s structured finance investments during 2007. NNN recorded interest income on mortgages receivable and structured finance investments of $4,240,000 and $3,966,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

30


Table of Contents

Interest Income on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests.  The decrease in interest income on the Residuals for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to 2006, is primarily the result of the amortization and pre-payments of the underlying notes.

Gain from Disposition of Real Estate, Inventory Portfolio.  Inventory Properties typically are operating properties and are classified as discontinued operations. However, the gains on the sale of Inventory Properties which are sold prior to rent commencement are reported in continuing operations. The decrease in the gain from the disposition of real estate is primarily due to the timing of sales of these Inventory Properties. The following table summarizes the Inventory Property dispositions included in continuing operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2007  2006 
   # of
    Properties    
      Gain      # of
    Properties    
      Gain     

Gain

                      2  $      332                      6  $      8,000 

Minority interest

  -   -  -   (3,609)
               

Gain, net of minority interest

  2  $332  6  $4,391 
               

Analysis of Expenses from Continuing Operations

General.  During 2008, operating expenses from continuing operations increased primarily as a result of the acquisition of additional properties. Operating expenses from continuing operations decreased as a percentage from NNN’s total revenues from continuing operations due to increased operating efficiencies. The following summarizes NNN’s expenses from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007  2006 

General and administrative

  $        24,868  $        23,542  $        24,007 

Real estate

   10,532   8,102   6,508 

Depreciation and amortization

   44,743   31,843   21,711 

Impairment – real estate

   -   416   - 

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation

   758   638   8,779 

Restructuring costs

   -   -   1,580 
             

    Total operating expenses

  $80,901  $64,541  $62,585 
             

Interest and other income

  $(3,748) $(4,753) $(3,816)

Interest expense

   58,483   49,286   45,872 

Loss on interest rate hedge

   804   -   - 
             

    Total other expenses (revenues)

  $55,539  $44,533  $42,056 
             

 

31


Table of Contents
   Percentage of Total
Operating Expenses
  Percentage of Revenues
from Continuing
Operations
  2008
Versus
2007
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
  2007
Versus
2006
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
   2008  2007  2006  2008  2007  2006    

General and administrative

  30.8%  36.5%  38.4%  11.0%  13.0%  17.7%  5.6%  (1.9)%

Real estate

  13.0%  12.6%  10.4%  4.6%  4.5%  4.8%  30.0%  24.5%

Depreciation and amortization

  55.3%  49.3%  34.7%  19.8%  17.6%  16.0%  40.5%  46.7%

Impairment – real estate

  -  0.6%  -  -  0.2%  -  (100.0)%  100.0%

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation

  0.9%  1.0%  14.0%  0.3%  0.4%  6.5%  18.8%  (92.7)%

Restructuring costs

  -  -  2.5%  -  -  1.2%  -  -
                      

    Total operating expenses

  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  35.7%  35.7%  46.2%  25.3%  3.1%
                      

Interest and other income

  (6.7)%  (10.7)%  (9.1)%  (1.7)%  (2.6)%  (2.8)%  (21.1)%  24.6%

Interest expense

  105.3%  110.7%  109.1%  25.8%  27.2%  33.8%  18.7%  7.4%

Loss of interest rate hedge

  1.4%  -  -  0.4%  -  -  100.0%  -
                      

    Total other expenses (revenues)

  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  24.5%  24.6%  31.0%  24.7%  5.9%
                      

Comparison of Year End December 31, 2008 to Year Ended December 31, 2007.

General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, but decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, is primarily related to an increase in lost pursuit costs.

Real Estate.  Real estate expenses remained fairly stable as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations, but increased slightly as a percentage of total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in real estate expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, is primarily attributable to an increase in tenant reimbursable real estate expenses related to newly acquired Investment Properties as well as an increase in expenses related to vacant properties.

Depreciation and Amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expenses increased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase is primarily a result of the depreciation recognized on (i) the 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet, acquired in 2008, and (ii) a full year of depreciation and amortization on the 235 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 2,205,000 square feet which were acquired during the year ended December 31, 2007.

Impairment – Real Estate.  NNN reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive return. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. No real estate impairments were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2008. During the year ended December 31, 2007, NNN recorded real estate impairments totaling $416,000.

 

32


Table of Contents

Impairment  –  Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests Valuation.  In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation adjustment of $758,000 and $638,000, respectively, as a reduction of earnings from operations.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, but decreased as a percentage of total operating expense and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase in interest expenses is primarily attributable to an increase of $233,201,000 in weighted average long-term debt outstanding. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by an overall decrease in weighted average interest rate for 2008 as compared to 2007.

The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:

 

 (i)repurchase of $25,000,000 of convertible notes payable with an effective interest rate of 3.95% in November 2008,
 (ii)issuance of $234,035,000 of convertible notes payable in March 2008, with an effective interest rate of 5.125%, due June 2028,
 (iii)payoff of the $100,000,000 7.125% notes payable in March 2008,
 (iv)payoff of the $12,000,000 secured note payable with stated interest rate of 10.00% in February 2008,
 (v)payoff of $26,041,000 10-year financing lease obligation with interest rate of 5.00% in November 2007,
 (vi)payoff of the $10,500,000 10.00% secured note in December 2007,
 (vii)payoff of the $20,800,000 variable rate term note in October 2007,
 (viii)repayment of mortgage in September 2007, with balance of $7,305,000 at December 31, 2006, and an interest rate of 7.37%,
 (ix)issuance of $250,000,000 of notes payable in September 2007, with an effective interest rate of 6.92% due in October 2017,
 (x)decrease of $5,403,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the revolving credit facility for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, and
 (xi)decrease in weighted average interest rate on the revolving credit facility from 6.24% for the period ended December 31, 2007, to 3.83% for the period ended December 31, 2008.

Comparison of Year End December 31, 2007 to Year Ended December 31, 2006.

General and Administrative.  General and administrative expenses decreased slightly for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006; however, such expenses remained fairly consistent as a percentage of total operating expense from continuing operations. The decrease in general and administrative expenses for 2007 was primarily attributable to a decrease in expenses related to personnel compensation and a decrease in lost pursuit costs.

Real Estate.  Real estate expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2006; however, such expenses remained fairly consistent as a percentage of total revenues from continuing operations. The increase in real estate expenses for 2007 as compared to the same period for 2006 is primarily attributable to (i) an increase in tenant reimbursable real estate expenses, and (ii) an increase in certain real estate expenses that were not reimbursable by tenants.

 

33


Table of Contents

Depreciation and Amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006 is attributable to (i) the acquisition of 235 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 2,205,000 square feet in 2007, and (ii) a full year of depreciation and amortization on the 213 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 1,130,000 square feet which were acquired during 2006. The increase in depreciation and amortization was partially offset by the disposition of 37 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 997,000 square feet during the year ended December 31, 2007.

Impairment – Real Estate.  NNN reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive return. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. During the year ended December 31, 2007, NNN recorded real estate impairments totaling $416,000. No real estate impairments were recorded during the year ended December 31, 2006.

Impairment – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests Valuation.  In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, NNN reduced the carrying value of the Residuals to reflect such fair value at December 31, 2007 and 2006. In 2007, due to changes in market conditions relating to residual assets, the independent valuation increased the discount rate from 17% to 25%. Other than temporary valuation adjustments are recorded as a reduction of earnings from operations. For the years ended December 2007 and 2006, NNN recorded an other than temporary impairment of $638,000 and $8,779,000, respectively.

Restructuring Costs.  During the year ended December 31, 2006, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $1,580,000, which included severance costs and accelerated vesting of restricted stock in connection with a workforce reduction in April 2006. No such costs were incurred during 2007.

Interest Expense.  The increase in interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, is primarily attributable to an increase of $126,164,000 in weighted average long-term debt outstanding. The increase in the weighted average long-term debt was due to the increase in dollars invested in Investment and Inventory Properties. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by an increase of $1,440,000 in the interest capitalized to construction projects in 2007, as well as by a decrease in the overall weighted average interest rate for 2007 as compared to 2006. The following represents the primary changes in debt:

 

 (i)issuance of $250,000,000 of notes payable in September 2007 with an effective interest rate of 6.92% due in October 2017,
 (ii)payoff of $26,041,000 10-year financing lease obligation with interest rate of 5.00% in November 2007,
 (iii)repayment of mortgage in September 2007 with balance of $7,305,000 at December 31, 2006 and an interest rate of 7.37%,
 (iv)the decrease in the weighted average debt outstanding on the revolving credit facility (decreased by $28,506,000),
 (v)issuance of $172,500,000 of convertible notes payable in September 2006 with an effective interest rate of 3.95% due in September 2026,

 

34


Table of Contents
 (vi)payoff of the $20,800,000 variable rate term note in October 2007, which was assumed in connection with the acquisition of National Properties Corporation (“NAPE”) in June 2005,
 (vii)repayment of a mortgage in February 2006 with a balance of $18,538,000 at December 31, 2005 with an interest rate of 7.435%, and
 (viii)payoff of the $10,500,000 OAMI secured note payable in December 2007, with a stated interest rate of 10.00%.

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates

In September 2007, NNN entered into a joint venture, NNN Retail Properties Fund I LLC (the “NNN Crow JV”) with an affiliate of Crow Holdings Realty Partners IV, L.P. NNN Crow JV owns real estate assets leased to convenience store operators from unrelated third parties. NNN owns 15 percent interest in the joint venture which it accounts for under the equity method of accounting. Net income and losses of the joint venture are allocated to the members in accordance with their respective percentage interests. During the year ended December 31, 2007, in accordance with the terms of the joint venture agreement, NNN loaned $2,749,000 to the joint venture at an interest rate of 7.75%. The loan balance was paid in full in November 2007. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, NNN recognized equity in earnings of $364,000 and $49,000, respectively, from NNN Crow JV. NNN manages the joint venture pursuant to a management agreement and earned certain fees of $531,000 and $21,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

In October 2006, NNN sold its equity investment in CNL Plaza, Ltd. and CNL Plaza Venture, Ltd. (collectively, “Plaza”) for $10,239,000 and recognized a gain of $11,373,000. Plaza owned a 346,000 square foot office building, one floor of which serves as NNN’s headquarters office, and an interest in an adjacent parking garage. In connection with the sale, NNN was released as a guarantor of Plaza’s $14,000,000 unsecured promissory note. During the year ended December 31, 2006, NNN recognized equity in earnings of $122,000 from Plaza. NNN did not recognize earnings from Plaza during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Earnings from Discontinued Operations

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” NNN classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses related to its Investment Properties that were sold, its leasehold interests that expired and any Investment Properties that were held for sale at December 31, 2008. NNN also classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses of its Inventory Properties which generated rental revenues. NNN records discontinued operations by NNN’s identified segments: (i) Investment Assets, and (ii) Inventory Assets. The following table summarizes the earnings from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

  2008 2007 2006
  # of Sold
Properties
 Gain Earnings # of Sold
Properties
 Gain Earnings # of Sold
Properties
 Gain Earnings

Investment Assets

 19 $9,980 $12,476 37 $56,625 $67,583 30 $91,332 $114,298

Inventory Assets, net of minority interest

 24  9,337  6,876 69  10,681  8,621 58  5,275  8,186
                        
             43 $  19,317 $  19,352                 106 $  67,306 $  76,204                 88 $96,607 $  122,484
                        

NNN occasionally sells Investment Properties and may reinvest the proceeds of the sales to purchase new properties or pay down outstanding indebtedness.

 

35


Table of Contents

Impact of Inflation

NNN’s leases typically contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on NNN’s results of operations. Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent, rent increases may not keep up with the rate of inflation.

The Investment Properties are leased to tenants under long-term, net leases which typically require the tenant to pay certain operating expenses of a property, thus, NNN’s exposure to inflation is reduced. Inflation may have an adverse impact on NNN’s tenants.

Liquidity

General.  NNN’s demand for funds has been and will continue to be primarily for (i) payment of operating expenses and cash dividends; (ii) property acquisitions and development; (iii) origination of mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments) and capital expenditures; (iv) payment of principal and interest on its outstanding indebtedness; and (v) other investments.

NNN expects to meet these requirements (other than amounts required for additional property investments, mortgages and notes receivables, including structured finance investments) through cash provided from operations and NNN’s $400,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”). NNN utilizes the Credit Facility to meet its short-term working capital requirements. As of December 31, 2008, $26,500,000 was outstanding and approximately $373,500,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $1,265,000. NNN anticipates that any additional investments in properties, mortgages and notes receivables and structured finance investments during the next 12 months will be funded by the Credit Facility, cash provided from operations, the issuance of long-term debt or the issuance of common or preferred equity or other instruments convertible into or exchangeable for common or preferred equity. However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.

Below is a summary of NNN’s cash flows for each of the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

 

    2008  2007  2006 

Cash and cash equivalents:

    

Provided by operating activities

  $236,748  $129,634  $1,676 

Used in investing activities

   (256,304)  (536,717)  (90,099)

Provided by (used in) financing activities

   (5,317)  432,907   81,864 
             

Increase (decrease)

   (24,873)  25,824   (6,559)

January 1

   27,499   1,675   8,234 
             

December 31

  $2,626  $27,499  $1,675 
             

Cash provided by operating activities represents cash received primarily from rental income from tenants, proceeds from the disposition of Inventory Properties and interest income less general and administrative expenses, interest expense and acquisition of Inventory Properties. NNN’s cash flow from operating activities, net of cash used in and provided by the acquisition and disposition of its Inventory Properties, has been sufficient to pay the distributions for each period presented. NNN uses proceeds from its Credit Facility to fund the acquisition of its Inventory Properties. The change in cash

 

36


Table of Contents

provided by operations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, is primarily the result of changes in revenues and expenses as discussed in “Results of Operations.” Cash generated from operations is expected to fluctuate in the future.

Changes in cash for investing activities are primarily attributable to the acquisitions and dispositions of Investment Properties.

NNN’s financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 included the following significant transactions:

 

  

$12,000,000 repayment of secured note payable with stated interest rate of 10.0% in February 2008,

 

  

$100,000,000 repayment of 7.125% notes payable in March 2008,

 

  

$228,576,000 in net proceeds from issuance of 2028 convertible notes payable,

 

  

$75,958,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of 3,450,000 shares of common stock in October 2008,

 

  

$110,107,000 in dividends paid to common stockholders,

 

  

$6,785,000 in dividends paid to holders of the depositary shares of NNN’s Series C Preferred stock,

 

  

$103,300,000 in net payments from NNN’s Credit Facility,

 

  

$47,372,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of 2,146,640 common shares in connection with the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”),

 

  

$19,188,000 in net payments on repurchase of $25,000,000 of 3.95% convertible notes payable due September 2026, and

 

  

$5,483,000 in minority interests distributions.

Financing Strategy.  NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategy while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to NNN’s stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.

NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional Investment Properties with cash from its Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2008, $26,500,000 was outstanding and approximately $373,500,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $1,265,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, NNN’s ratio of total liabilities to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation) was approximately 40 percent and the secured indebtedness to total gross assets was approximately one percent. The total debt to total market capitalization was approximately 43 percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances. The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy.

 

37


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments.  The information in the following table summarizes NNN’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2008. The table presents principal cash flows by year-end of the expected maturity for debt obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2008.

 

   

Expected Maturity Date

(dollars in thousands)

   Total  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  Thereafter

Long-term debt(1)

  $1,027,825  $1,001  $21,022  $148,598  $69,291  $234,898  $553,015

Credit Facility

   26,500   -   26,500   -   -   -   -

Operating lease

   5,422   865   891   917   945   973   831
                            

Total contractual cash obligations(2)

  $    1,059,747  $    1,866  $    48,413  $    149,515  $    70,236  $    235,871  $    553,846
                            

 

(1)

Includes amounts outstanding under the mortgages payable, secured notes payable, convertible notes payable and notes payable and excludes unamortized note discounts.

(2)

Excludes $7,608 of accrued interest payable.

In addition to the contractual obligations outlined above, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments in connection with the development of additional properties as outlined below (dollars in thousands) as of December 31, 2008:

 

   #
    Properties    
  Total
Commitment
(1)
  Amount Funded  Remaining
Commitment

Investment Portfolio

                      21  $            97,690  $              70,451  $          27,239

Inventory Portfolio

  1   4,814   2,212   2,602
               
  22  $102,504  $72,663  $29,841
               

 

 

(1)

Including construction and land costs.

As of December 31, 2008, NNN had outstanding letters of credit totaling $1,265,000 under its Credit Facility.

As of December 31, 2008, NNN does not have any other material contractual cash obligations, such as purchase obligations, financing lease obligations or other long-term liabilities other than those reflected in the table. In addition to items reflected in the table, NNN has preferred stock with cumulative preferential cash distributions, as described below under “Dividends.”

Management anticipates satisfying these obligations with a combination of NNN’s current capital resources on hand, its Credit Facility, debt or equity financings and asset dispositions.

Many of the Investment Properties are recently constructed and are generally net leased. Therefore, management anticipates that capital demands to meet obligations with respect to these Investment Properties will be modest for the foreseeable future and can be met with funds from operations and working capital. Certain of NNN’s Investment Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for certain costs and expenses associated with the Investment Property. Management anticipates the costs associated with NNN’s vacant Investment Properties or those Investment Properties that become vacant will also be met with funds from operations and working capital. NNN may be required to borrow under its Credit Facility or use other sources of capital in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures.

The lost revenues and increased property expenses from vacant properties or uncollectibility of lease revenues could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations if NNN is

 

38


Table of Contents

unable to release the Investment Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of January 31, 2009, NNN owns 34 vacant, unleased Investment Properties and two vacant land parcels which account for approximately four percent of total Investment Properties held in NNN’s Investment Portfolio. Additionally, two percent of the total gross leasable area of NNN’s Investment Portfolio is leased to three tenants that have filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result, these tenants have the right to reject or affirm their leases with NNN.

In May 2008, one of NNN’s tenants, Uni-Mart, Inc. (“Uni-Mart”), which leased 69 Investment Properties and eight Inventory Properties, filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In July 2008, Uni-Mart elected to reject the leases of 13 properties owned by NNN with total annual base rent of approximately $786,000. Additionally, in December 2008, Uni-Mart elected to reject an additional three properties. NNN has re-leased nine of the 16 properties as of December 31, 2008, and continues to market for re-lease or sale the remaining properties. In February 2009, Uni-Mart filed a motion to reject the leases of 38 additional properties. However, at NNN’s option, it may assume the in-place subleases to the existing convenience store operators, which approximate current existing rent. During the year ended December 31, 2008, NNN recorded $2,421,000 of income in connection with the Uni-Mart bankruptcy damage claim. NNN does not believe Uni-Mart’s Chapter 11 filing will have a material adverse effect on its operations and financial position.

Dividends.  NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and related regulations. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost. Such an event could materially affect NNN’s income and its ability to pay dividends. NNN believes it has been organized as, and its past and present operations qualify NNN as a REIT. Additionally, NNN intends to continue to operate so as to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

One of NNN’s primary objectives, consistent with its policy of retaining sufficient cash for reserves and working capital purposes and maintaining its status as a REIT, is to distribute a substantial portion of its funds available from operations to its stockholders in the form of dividends. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, NNN declared and paid dividends to its common stockholders of $110,107,000, $92,989,000, and $76,035,000, respectively, or $1.48, $1.40 and $1.32 per share, respectively, of common stock.

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

 

  2008 2007 2006

Ordinary dividends

 $  1.480000 100.000% $  1.397402 99.8144% $  1.150780 87.1803%

Qualified dividends

  - -  0.000414 0.0296%  - -

Capital gain

  - -  0.002184 0.1560%  0.150261 11.3834%

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

  - -  - -  0.018959 1.4363%

Nontaxable distributions

  - -  - -  - -
               
 $1.480000 100.000% $1.400000 100.0000% $1.320000 100.0000%
               

 

39


Table of Contents

In February 2009, NNN paid dividends to its common stockholders of $29,313,000, or $0.375 per share of common stock.

Holders of each of NNN’s preferred stock issuances are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the board of directors, cumulative preferential cash distributions based on the stated rate and liquidation preference per annum. The following table outlines each issuance of NNN’s preferred stock (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

 

Non Voting

Preferred

Stock

Issuance

 Shares
Outstanding
At
December 31,
2008
 Liquidation
Preference
(per share)
 Fixed Annual
Cash
Distribution
(per share)
 

Dividends Declared and Paid

For the Year Ended December 31,

    2008 2007 2006
    Total Per
Share
 Total Per
Share
 Total Per
Share

9% Series A(1)

 - $        25.00 $        25.00000 $- $- $- $- $    4,376 $    2.456250

6.7% Series B Convertible(2)

 -  2,500.00  167.50000  -  -  -  -  419  41.875000

7.375% Series C(3)

 3,680,000  25.00  1.84375  6,785      1.84375      6,785        1.84375  923  0.250955

 

(1)

Effective January 2, 2007, NNN redeemed all 1,781,589 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at their redemption price of $25.00 per share plus all accumulated and unpaid dividends through the redemption date of $0.20625 per share, for an aggregate redemption price of $25.20625. Dividends declared and paid in 2006 include $367 of dividends payable at December 31, 2006, which were paid in 2007.

(2)

In April 2006, the holder of NNN’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock elected to convert those 10,000 shares into 1,293,996 shares of common stock.

(3)

In October 2006, NNN issued 3,680,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. See Capital Resources – Debt and Equity Securities.”

Capital Resources

Generally, cash needs for property acquisitions, mortgages and notes receivable, structured finance investments, capital expenditures, development and other investments have been funded by equity and debt offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties and, to a lesser extent, from internally generated funds. Cash needs for other items have been met from operations. If available, future sources of capital include proceeds from the public or private offering of NNN’s debt or equity securities, secured or unsecured borrowings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties, as well as undistributed funds from operations.

Debt

The following is a summary of NNN’s total outstanding debt as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  Percentage
of Total
  2007  Percentage
of Total

Line of credit payable

  $26,500  2.5%  $129,800  12.2%

Mortgages payable

   26,290  2.5%   27,480  2.6%

Notes payable – secured

   —    —     12,000  1.1%

Notes payable – convertible

   381,535  36.2%   172,500  16.3%

Notes payable

   618,479  58.8%   718,290  67.8%
              

Total outstanding debt

  $        1,052,804          100.0%  $        1,060,070          100.0%
              

Line of Credit Payable.  In October 2007, NNN exercised the $100,000,000 accordion feature of its existing revolving Credit Facility increasing the borrowing capacity to $400,000,000 from $300,000,000. Additionally, in October 2008, NNN exercised the option to extend the maturity date by twelve months from May 2009 to May 2010. The current terms of the Credit Facility provide for (i) a tiered interest rate structure of a maximum of 112.5 basis points above LIBOR (as a result of an upgrade in NNN’s debt rating in June 2008, NNN’s current interest rate is 65 basis points above

 

40


Table of Contents

LIBOR), (ii) requires NNN to pay a commitment fee based on a tiered rate structure to a maximum of 25 basis points per annum (based upon the debt rating of NNN, the current commitment fee is 20 basis points), (iii) provides for a competitive bid option for up to 50 percent of the facility amount, and (iv) expires on May 8, 2010. The principal balance is due in full upon expiration. As of December 31, 2008, $26,500,000 was outstanding and approximately $373,500,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $1,265,000.

In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage, and (iv) investment limitations. At December 31, 2008, NNN was in compliance with those covenants. In the event that NNN violates any of these restrictive financial covenants, its access to the debt or equity markets may become impaired.

Mortgages Payable.  In September 2007, upon maturity, NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance on the long-term fixed rate loan which had an original principal balance of $12,000,000, and was secured by a first mortgage on nine Investment Properties. Upon repayment of the loan, the encumbered Investment Properties were released from the mortgage. As of December 31, 2006, the outstanding principal balance was $7,305,000 with an interest rate of 7.37%.

In December 2008, upon maturity, NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance on a self-amortizing mortgage which had an original principal balance of $1,916,000 and was secured by a first mortgage on one Investment Property. Upon repayment of the loan, the encumbered Investment Property was released from the mortgage. As of December 31, 2007, the outstanding principal balance was $263,000 with an interest rate of 8.25%.

Notes Payable – Secured.  In February 2008, NNN repaid the outstanding principal amount on its secured note payable. NNN repaid the outstanding balance of the note payable with restricted cash that was released in December 2007. The note had an outstanding principal balance of $12,000,000 at December 31, 2007, a stated interest rate of 10.0% and an original maturity date of June 2008.

In December 2007, NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance of $10,500,000 on one of its secured notes which had an interest rate of 10.00%. NNN repaid the outstanding balance of the note with the restricted cash that was released in December 2007.

Notes Payable – Convertible.  Each of NNN’s outstanding series of convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

 

Convertible

Senior Notes

 Issue Date Original
Principal
 Net
Proceeds
 Effective
Interest
Rate
 Debt
Issuance
Costs
  Earliest
Conversion
Date
 Earliest Put
  Option Date    
 Maturity
Date

2026(1)(2)(4)

 September 2006 $    172,500 $    168,650 3.950% $      3,850(3) September 2025 September 2011 September 2026

2028(2)(5)

 March 2008  234,035  228,576 5.125%  5,459  June 2027 June 2013 June 2028

 

(1)

NNN repurchased $25,000 in November 2008 for a purchase price of $19,188.

(2)

Debt issuance costs include underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the period to the earliest put option date of the holders using the effective interest method.

(3)

Includes $356 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $25,000 of the 2026 Notes.

(4)

The conversion rate per $1,000 principal amount was 41.2951 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $24.2159 per share of common stock.

(5)

The conversion rate per $1,000 principal amount was 39.3459 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $25.42 per share of common stock.

 

41


Table of Contents

Each series of convertible notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of the Company. Each note is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through but not including the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

Notes Payable. Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

 

            Notes            

  Issue Date  Principal  Discount(3)  Net Price  Stated
Rate
  Effective
Rate
(4)
  Maturity Date

2010(1)

  September 2000  $        20,000  $            126  $    19,874  8.500%  8.595%  September 2010

2012(1)

  June 2002   50,000   287   49,713  7.750%  7.833%  June 2012

2014(1)(2)(5)

  June 2004   150,000   440   149,560  6.250%  5.910%  June 2014

2015(1)

  November 2005   150,000   390   149,610  6.150%  6.185%  December 2015

2017(1)(6)

  September 2007   250,000   877   249,123  6.875%  6.924%  October 2017

 

(1)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility.

(2)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to repay the obligation of the 2004 Notes.

(3)

The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.

(4)

Includes the effects of the discount and interest rate hedge (as applicable).

(5)

NNN entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement which fixed a swap rate of 4.61% on a notional amount of $94,000. Upon issuance of the 2014 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting interest rate swap agreement resulting in a gain of $4,148. The gain has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2014 Notes using the effective interest method.

(6)

NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a loss of $3,228. The loss has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.

Each series of notes represent senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. The notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

In connection with the note offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling $5,459,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.

In accordance with the terms of the indenture, pursuant to which NNN’s notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios, and (ii) certain interest coverage. At December 31, 2008, NNN was in compliance with those covenants. In the event that NNN violates any of the certain restrictive financial covenants, its access to the debt or equity markets may become impaired.

In addition, in connection with the acquisition of NAPE, NNN assumed a $20,800,000 term note payable (“Term Note”). In October 2007, NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance on its $20,800,000 Term Note. The Term Note had a weighted interest rate of 6.62% as of December 2006.

In March 2008, NNN repaid the 7.125% $100,000,000 notes that were due in March 2008.

 

42


Table of Contents

Debt and Equity Securities

NNN has used, and expects to use in the future, issuances of debt and equity securities primarily to pay down its outstanding indebtedness and to finance investment acquisitions. NNN has maintained investment grade debt ratings from Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s Investor Service and Fitch Ratings on its senior, unsecured debt since 1998. In June 2008, NNN’s debt rating was upgraded by Moody’s Investor Service. Immediately following the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, NNN expects to file a shelf registration statement with the Commission which will be automatically effective and which permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities.

A description of NNN’s outstanding series of publicly held notes is found under “Debt – Notes Payable – Convertible” and “Debt – Notes Payable” above.

7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.  In October 2006, NNN issued 3,200,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and received gross proceeds of $80,000,000. Subsequently, NNN issued an additional 480,000 depositary shares in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received gross proceeds of $12,000,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs of approximately $3,098,000, consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

Holders of the depositary shares are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 7.375% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per depositary share per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $1.84375 per depositary share). The Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares ranks senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. NNN may redeem the Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares on or after October 12, 2011, for cash, at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends.

In January 2007, NNN used $44,540,000 of the net proceeds from the offering to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock; and the remainder of the net proceeds were used to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility.

Common Stock Issuances.  In March 2007, NNN issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $24.70 per share and received net proceeds of $118,020,000. Subsequently, in April 2007, NNN issued an additional 750,000 shares of common stock in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received net proceeds of $17,730,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $6,217,000 consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

In October 2007, NNN issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $25.94 per share and received net proceeds of $99,150,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $4,874,000 consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees. In October 2007, NNN used a portion of the net proceeds to repay the outstanding principal balance on its term note.

In October 2008, NNN issued 3,450,000 shares of common stock in a registered, underwritten public offering at a price of $23.05 per share and received net proceeds of $75,958,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $3,565,000 consisting

 

43


Table of Contents

primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees. NNN used the net proceeds to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility and to acquire Investment Properties.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.  In February 2006, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission for its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”), which permits the issuance by NNN of up to 12,191,394 shares of common stock. The DRIP provides an economical and convenient way for current stockholders and other interested new investors to invest in NNN’s common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to NNN’s DRIP for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

    2008  2007

Shares of common stock

       2,146,640       2,645,257

Net proceeds

  $47,372  $62,980

The proceeds from the issuances were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness under NNN’s Credit Facility.

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates.

In September 2007, NNN entered into a joint venture, NNN Retail Properties Fund I LLC (the “NNN Crow JV”), with an affiliate of Crow Holdings Realty Partners IV, L.P. NNN Crow JV owns real estate assets leased to convenience store operators from unrelated third parties. NNN owns a 15 percent equity interest in the joint venture which it accounts for under the equity method of accounting. Net income and losses of the joint venture are allocated to the members in accordance with their respective percentage interest. During the year ended December 31, 2007, in accordance with the terms of the joint venture agreement, NNN loaned $2,749,000 to the joint venture at an interest rate of 7.75%. The loan balance was paid in full in November 2007 (see Note 4).

Mortgages and Notes Receivable.

Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

    2008  2007 

Mortgages and notes receivable

  $    55,495  $    58,556 

Structured finance investments

   4,514   14,359 

Accrued interest receivables

   387   578 

Unamortized premium

   84   165 
         
   60,480   73,658 

Less loan origination fees, net

   (8)  (100)

Less allowance

   -   (396)
         
  $60,472  $73,162 
         

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Structured finance investments are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate.

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests.

In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, NNN adjusted carrying value of the Residuals to reflect such fair value at December 31, 2008. The adjustments in the Residuals’ were recorded as an aggregate other than temporary valuation impairment of $758,000 and $638,000, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. NNN recorded $2,009,000 of unrealized gains and $326,000 of unrealized losses as other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

44


Table of Contents

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

NNN is exposed to interest changes primarily as a result of its Credit Facility and its long-term, fixed rate debt used to finance NNN’s development and acquisition activities, and for general corporate purposes. NNN’s interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives, NNN borrows at both fixed and variable rates on its long-term debt. As of December 31, 2008, NNN had no outstanding derivatives.

The information in the table below summarizes NNN’s market risks associated with its debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2008 and 2007. The table presents principal cash flows and related interest rates by year for debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2008. The variable interest rates shown represent the weighted average rates for the Credit Facility at the end of the periods. The table incorporates only those debt obligations that exist as of December 31, 2008, and it does not consider those debt obligations or positions which could arise after this date. Moreover, because firm commitments are not presented in the table below, the information presented therein has limited predictive value. As a result, NNN’s ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, NNN’s hedging strategies at that time and interest rates. If interest rates on NNN’s variable rate debt increased by one percent, NNN’s interest expense would have increased approximately one percent for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

   Debt Obligations (dollars in thousands)
   Variable Rate Debt  Fixed Rate Debt
   Credit Facility  Mortgages  Unsecured Debt(2)
   Debt
  Obligation  
  Weighted
Average

Interest
Rate(1)
  Debt
    Obligation  
  Weighted
Average

Interest
Rate
  Debt
  Obligation  
  Effective
Interest
Rate

2009

 $-  -  $1,001  7.02%  $-  -

2010

  26,500  3.83%   1,022  7.02%   19,970  8.60%

2011

  -  -   1,098  7.00%   147,500  3.95%

2012

  -  -   19,291  6.99%   49,876  7.83%

2013

  -  -   863  7.34%   -  -

Thereafter

  -  -   3,015  7.33%   782,668  6.05%
                 
           

Total

 $        26,500  3.83%  $          26,290  7.02%  $    1,000,014  5.88%
                 

Fair Value:

           

December 31, 2008

 $        26,500    $          26,290    $728,757  
                 

December 31, 2007(3)

 $        129,800    $          27,480    $921,507  
                 

(1)     The Credit Facility interest rate varies based upon a tiered rate structure ranging from 55 to 112.5 basis points above LIBOR based upon NNN’s debt rating.

(2)     Includes NNN’s notes payable, net of unamortized note discounts, and convertible notes payable. NNN uses Bloomberg to determine the fair value.

(3)     In February 2008, NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance on its notes payable – secured debt. As of December 31, 2007, the outstanding notes payable – secured debt obligations and the fair value of such was $12,000 with a 10.0% interest rate.

NNN is also exposed to market risks related to NNN’s Residuals. Factors that may impact the market value of the Residuals include delinquencies, loan losses, prepayment speeds and interest rates. The Residuals, which are reported at market value, had a carrying value of $22,000,000 and $24,340,000 as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Losses are considered other than temporary and are reported as a valuation impairment in earnings from operations if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows that leads to a loss in value.

 

45


Table of Contents

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited National Retail Properties, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). National Retail Properties, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Managements’ Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, National Retail Properties, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, and our report dated February 26, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

LOGO

Miami, Florida

February 26, 2009

 

46


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of National Retail Properties, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for the each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), National Retail Properties, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

LOGO

Miami, Florida

February 26, 2009

 

47


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

ASSETS

  December 31,
2008
  December 31,
2007

Real estate, Investment Portfolio:

    

Accounted for using the operating method, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization

  $        2,357,894  $        2,055,846

Accounted for using the direct financing method

   31,240   37,497

Real estate, Inventory Portfolio, held for sale

   101,106   248,611

Investment in unconsolidated affiliate

   4,927   4,139

Mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable, net of allowance

   60,472   73,162

Commercial mortgage residual interests

   22,000   24,340

Cash and cash equivalents

   2,626   27,499

Receivables, net of allowance of $4,003 and $1,582, respectively

   3,612   3,818

Accrued rental income, net of allowance of $4,144 and $3,077, respectively

   23,972   24,652

Debt costs, net of accumulated amortization of $12,975 and $13,424, respectively

   11,233   8,548

Other assets

   30,280   31,493
        

Total assets

  $2,649,362  $2,539,605
        

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Line of credit payable

  $26,500  $129,800

Mortgages payable

   26,290   27,480

Notes payable – secured

   -   12,000

Notes payable – convertible

   381,535   172,500

Notes payable, net of unamortized discount of $1,521 and $1,710, respectively

   618,479   718,290

Accrued interest payable

   7,608   11,243

Other liabilities

   45,526   58,673
        

Total liabilities

   1,105,938   1,129,986
        

Commitments and contingencies (Note 27)

    

Minority interest

   1,215   2,334

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 15,000,000 shares

    

Series C, 3,680,000 depositary shares issued and outstanding, at stated liquidation value of $25 per share

   92,000   92,000

Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 190,000,000 shares; 78,415,051 and 72,527,729 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively

   784   725

Excess stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 205,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding

   -   -

Capital in excess of par value

   1,302,351   1,175,364

Retained earnings (accumulated dividends in excess of net earnings)

   143,789   137,599

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   3,285   1,597
        

Total stockholders’ equity

   1,542,209   1,407,285
        
  $2,649,362  $2,539,605
        

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

48


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
    2008  2007  2006 

Revenues:

    

Rental income from operating leases

  $206,195  $160,826  $115,574 

Earned income from direct financing leases

   3,103   3,221   3,201 

Percentage rent

   1,104   1,424   552 

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

   7,126   5,688   4,569 

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

   4,352   4,834   4,436 

Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests

   4,636   4,882   7,268 
             
   226,516   180,875   135,600 
             

Disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio:

    

Gross proceeds

   4,900   1,750   36,705 

Costs

   (4,879)  (1,418)  (28,705)
             

Gain

   21   332   8,000 
             

Operating expenses:

    

General and administrative

   24,868   23,542   24,007 

Real estate

   10,532   8,102   6,508 

Depreciation and amortization

   44,743   31,843   21,711 

Impairment – real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   -   416   - 

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation

   758   638   8,779 

Restructuring costs

   -   -   1,580 
             
   80,901   64,541   62,585 
             

Earnings from operations

   145,636   116,666   81,015 
             

Other expenses (revenues):

    

Interest and other income

   (3,748)  (4,753)  (3,816)

Interest expense

   58,483   49,286   45,872 

Loss on interest rate hedge

   804   -   - 
             
   55,539   44,533   42,056 
             

Earnings from continuing operations before income tax benefit, minority interest, equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, gain on disposition of equity investment and gain on extinguishment of debt

   90,097   72,133   38,959 

Income tax benefit

   7,501   8,536   11,231 

Minority interest

   304   188   (1,664)

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   364   49   122 

Gain on disposition of equity investment

   -   -   11,373 

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   5,464   -   - 
             

Earnings from continuing operations

   103,730   80,906   60,021 

Earnings from discontinued operations:

    

Real estate, Investment Portfolio (Note 18)

   12,476   67,583   114,298 

Real estate, Inventory Portfolio, net of income tax expense and minority interest
(Note 18)

   6,876   8,621   8,186 
             
   19,352   76,204   122,484 
             

Net earnings

   123,082   157,110   182,505 

Other comprehensive income

   1,688   (3,622)  5,219 
             

Total comprehensive income

  $124,770  $153,488  $187,724 
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

49


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS – CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
    2008  2007  2006 

Net earnings

  $123,082  $157,110  $182,505 

Series A preferred stock dividends

   -   -   (4,376)

Series B convertible preferred stock dividends

   -   -   (419)

Series C preferred stock dividends

   (6,785)  (6,785)  (923)
             

Net earnings available to common stockholders – basic

   116,297   150,325   176,787 

Series B convertible preferred stock dividends, if dilutive

   -   -   419 
             

Net earnings available to common stockholders – diluted

  $116,297  $150,325  $177,206 
             

Net earnings per share of common stock:

    

Basic:

    

Continuing operations

  $1.31  $1.12  $0.94 

Discontinued operations

   0.26   1.15   2.14 
             

Net earnings

  $1.57  $2.27  $3.08 
             

Diluted:

    

Continuing operations

  $1.30  $1.11  $0.94 

Discontinued operations

   0.26   1.15   2.11 
             

Net earnings

  $1.56  $2.26  $3.05 
             

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

    

Basic

   74,249,137   66,152,437   57,428,063 
             

Diluted

   74,521,909   66,407,530   58,079,875 
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

50


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Series A
  Preferred  
Stock
 Series B
Convertible
Preferred
Stock
  Series C
Preferred
Stock
 Common
Stock
 Capital in
  Excess of  
Par Value
  Retained Earnings
  (Accumulated  
Dividends in
Excess of Net
Earnings)
    Accumulated  
Other
Comprehensive
Income
  Total 

Balances at December 31, 2005

 $44,540 $        25,000  $- $551 $778,485  $                  (20,489) $-  $828,087 

Net earnings

  -  -   -  -  -   182,505   -   182,505 

Dividends declared and paid:

        

$2.25 per share of Series A preferred stock

  -  -   -  -  -   (4,376)  -   (4,376)

$41.875 per share of Series B convertible preferred stock(1)

  -  -   -  -  -   (419)  -   (419)

$0.250955 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

  -  -   -  -  -   (923)  -   (923)

$1.32 per share of common stock

  -  -   -  3  7,073   (76,035)  -   (68,959)

Conversion of 10,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock to 1,293,996 shares of common stock

  -  (25,000)  -  13  24,987   -   -   - 

Issuance of 3,680,000 depositary shares of Series C preferred stock

  -  -   92,000  -  -   -   -   92,000 

Issuance of common stock:

        

272,184 shares

  -  -   -  3  4,654   -   -   4,657 

2,715,235 shares – discounted stock purchase program

  -  -   -  27  58,632   -   -   58,659 

Issuance of 79,500 shares of restricted common stock

  -  -   -  1  (1)  -   -   - 

Stock issuance costs

  -  -   -  -  (3,111)  -   -   (3,111)

Amortization of deferred compensation

  -  -   -  -  3,166   -   -   3,166 

Treasury lock – gain on interest rate hedge(2)

  -  -   -  -  -   -   3,653   3,653 

Amortization of interest rate hedge

  -  -   -  -  -   -   (345)  (345)

Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests

  -  -   -  -  -   -   1,992   1,992 

Stock value adjustment

  -  -   -  -  -   -   (81)  (81)
                             

Balances at December 31, 2006

 $        44,540 $-  $        92,000 $        598 $        873,885  $80,263  $                5,219  $    1,096,505 

 

(1)

Includes $367 dividends paid in January 2007.

(2)

Fair value of interest rate hedge net of prior year amortization reclassified from NNN’s unsecured notes payable from the unamortized interest rate hedge gain resulting from the termination of the $94,000 swap in June 2004.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

51


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY – CONTINUED

Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

    Series A
Preferred
Stock
  Series B
Convertible
Preferred
Stock
  Series C
Preferred
Stock
  Common
Stock
  Capital in
Excess of
Par Value
  Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
Dividends in
Excess of Net
Earnings)
  Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
  Total 

Balances at December 31, 2006

  $44,540  $-  $    92,000  $598  $873,885  $80,263  $              5,219  $1,096,505 

Net earnings

   -   -   -   -   -   157,110   -   157,110 

Dividends declared and paid:

            

$1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

   -   -   -   -   -   (6,785)  -   (6,785)

$1.40 per share of common stock

   -   -   -   6   13,947   (92,989)  -   (79,036)

Redemption of 1,781,589 shares of Series A preferred stock

   (44,540)  -   -   -   -   -   -   (44,540)

Issuance of common stock:

            

9,861,323 shares

   -   -   -   98   247,643   -   -   247,741 

2,054,805 shares – discounted stock purchase program

   -   -   -   21   49,006   -   -   49,027 

Issuance of 198,119 shares of restricted common stock

   -               -   -   2   (2)  -   -   - 

Stock issuance costs

   -   -   -   -   (11,206)  -   -   (11,206)

Amortization of deferred compensation

   -   -   -   -   2,091   -   -   2,091 

Interest rate hedge termination

   -   -   -   -   -   -   (3,119)  (3,119)

Amortization of interest rate hedges

   -   -   -   -   -   -   (309)  (309)

Unrealized loss – commercial mortgage residual interests

   -   -   -   -   -   -   (326)  (326)

Stock value adjustment

   -   -   -   -   -   -   132   132 
                                 

Balances at December 31, 2007

  $-  $-  $92,000  $725  $1,175,364  $137,599  $1,597  $1,407,285 

Net earnings

   -   -   -   -   -   123,082   -   123,082 

Dividends declared and paid:

            

$1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

   -   -   -   -   -   (6,785)  -   (6,785)

$1.48 per share of common stock

   -   -   -   4   8,472   (110,107)  -   (101,631)

Issuance of common stock:

            

3,523,285 shares

   -   -   -   35   80,633   -   -   80,668 

1,753,201 shares – discounted stock purchase program

   -   -   -   18   38,878   -   -   38,896 

Issuance of 217,397 shares of restricted common stock

   -   -   -   2   (2)  -   -   - 

Stock issuance costs

   -   -   -   -   (3,582)  -   -   (3,582)

Amortization of deferred compensation

   -   -   -   -   2,588   -   -   2,588 

Interest rate hedge termination

   -   -   -   -   -   -   (162)  (162)

Amortization of interest rate hedges

   -   -   -   -   -   -   (109)  (109)

Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests

   -   -   -   -   -   -   2,009   2,009 

Stock value adjustment

   -   -   -   -   -   -   (50)  (50)
                                 

Balances at December 31, 2008

  $            -  $               -  $92,000  $        784  $1,302,351  $        143,789  $        3,285  $1,542,209 
                                 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

52


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2008  2007  2006 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Net earnings

  $    123,082  $    157,110  $    182,505 

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Stock compensation expense

   2,588   2,091   3,170 

Depreciation and amortization

   45,402   32,976   24,524 

Impairment – real estate

   5,660   1,970   693 

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation

   758   638   8,779 

Amortization of notes payable discount

   189   164   137 

Amortization of deferred interest rate hedges

   (162)  (309)  (345)

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   (364)  (49)  (122)

Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates

   439   30   864 

Minority interests

   2,818   1,143   2,622 

Gain on disposition of real estate, Investment Portfolio

   (9,980)  (56,625)  (91,165)

Gain on disposition of equity investment

   -   -   (11,373)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   (5,464)  -   - 

Gain on disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   (12,665)  (12,133)  (13,781)

Deferred income taxes

   (5,593)  (4,590)  (8,366)

Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations:

    

Additions to real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   (33,745)  (165,160)  (195,956)

Proceeds from disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   128,785   160,173   101,324 

Decrease in real estate leased to others using the direct financing method

   1,195   2,130   2,982 

Decrease (increase) in work in process

   47   (4,217)  (3,315)

Decrease (increase) in mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable

   (217)  (301)  795 

Decrease in receivables

   243   3,924   642 

Increase in accrued rental income

   (978)  (2,631)  (5,777)

Decrease (increase) in other assets

   951   3,615   (520)

Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable

   (3,635)  5,254   450 

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

   (1,463)  4,510   1,951 

Increase (decrease) in current tax liability

   (1,143)  (79)  958 
             

Net cash provided by operating activities

   236,748   129,634   1,676 
             

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Proceeds from the disposition of real estate, Investment Portfolio

   60,027   136,295   222,778 

Proceeds from the disposition of equity investment

   -   -   10,239 

Additions to real estate, Investment Portfolio:

    

Accounted for using the operating method

   (352,618)  (677,101)  (351,100)

Accounted for using the direct financing method

   -   -   (1,449)

Investment in unconsolidated affiliates

   (901)  (4,156)  - 

Increase in mortgages and notes receivable

   (29,934)  (44,888)  (18,371)

Principal payments on mortgages and notes

   64,589   19,862   39,075 

Cash received from commercial mortgage residual interests

   3,591   6,208   16,885 

Restricted cash

   -   36,587   (6,396)

Payment of lease costs

   (922)  (2,912)  (2,790)

Other

   (136)  (6,612)  1,030 
             

Net cash used in investing activities

   (256,304)  (536,717)  (90,099)
             

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

53


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
    2008  2007  2006 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Proceeds from line of credit payable

  $    516,000  $    662,300  $    379,000 

Repayment of line of credit payable

   (619,300)  (560,500)  (513,300)

Repayment of mortgages payable

   (1,190)  (8,412)  (20,241)

Proceeds from notes payable – convertible

   234,035   -   172,500 

Repayment of notes payable – secured

   (12,000)  (33,300)  - 

Proceeds from notes payable

   -   249,122   - 

Repayment of notes payable

   (100,000)  -   (3,750)

Repayment of notes payable – convertible

   (19,188)  -   - 

Payment of interest rate hedge

   -   (3,228)  - 

Payment of debt costs

   (5,813)  (2,453)  (3,864)

Repayment of financing lease obligation

   -   (26,007)  - 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   128,039   310,721   70,392 

Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock

   -   -   88,902 

Redemption of 1,781,589 shares of Series A preferred stock

   -   (44,540)  - 

Payment of Series A preferred stock dividends

   -   -   (4,376)

Payment of Series B convertible preferred stock dividends

   -   -   (419)

Payment of Series C preferred stock dividends

   (6,785)  (6,785)  (923)

Payment of common stock dividends

   (110,107)  (92,989)  (76,039)

Minority interest distributions

   (5,483)  (62)  (5,817)

Minority interest contributions

   41   155   2 

Stock issuance costs

   (3,566)  (11,115)  (203)
             

Net cash provided (used in) by financing activities

   (5,317)  432,907   81,864 
             

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (24,873)  25,824   (6,559)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   27,499   1,675   8,234 
             

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $2,626  $27,499  $1,675 
             

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

    

    Interest paid, net of amount capitalized

  $69,395  $51,824  $50,774 
             

    Taxes paid

  $3,441  $1,375  $1,137 
             

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:

    

Issued 225,517, 211,118 and 79,500 shares of restricted and unrestricted common stock in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan

  $3,796  $4,323  $1,763 
             

Converted 10,000 shares of Series B convertible preferred stock to 1,293,996 shares of common stock in 2006

  $-  $-  $25,000 
             

Issued 12,766, 7,750 and 14,062 shares of common stock in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively to directors pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan

  $262  $182  $307 
             

Issued 26,879, 16,346 and 33,379 shares of common stock in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively pursuant to NNN’s Deferred Director Fee Plan

  $449  $331  $655 
             

Surrender of 2,520 and 8,600 shares of restricted common stock in 2008 and 2007, respectively

  $58  $182  $- 
             

Dividends on unvested restricted stock shares

  $-  $-  $4 
             

Change in other comprehensive income

  $1,688  $(3,622) $5,219 
             

Change in lease classification

  $300  $-  $885 
             

Transfer of real estate from Inventory Portfolio to Investment Portfolio

  $29,948  $14,845  $12,933 
             

Note and mortgage notes receivable accepted in connection with real estate transactions

  $24,245  $9,747  $1,582 
             

Assignment of mortgage payable in connection with the disposition of real estate

  $-  $-  $95,000 
             

Interest rate hedge

  $-  $109  $- 
             

Real estate acquired in connection with foreclosure

  $2,497  $-  $- 
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

 

54


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006

Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Organization and Nature of Business – National Retail Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments) on the consolidated balance sheets and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). NNN acquires, owns, invests in, manages and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2008, NNN owned 1,005 Investment Properties, with an aggregate gross leasable area of 11,251,000 square feet, located in 44 states. In addition, as of December 31, 2008, NNN’s Investment Assets included $60,472,000 in mortgages, notes and interest receivable (including structured finance investments) and $22,000,000 in commercial mortgage residual interests. The Inventory Assets are operated through the TRS. The TRS, directly and indirectly, through investment interests, acquires and/or develops real estate primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2008, the TRS owned 32 Inventory Properties.

Principles of Consolidation – In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46R”). This Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements,” addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities.

NNN’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of each of the respective majority owned and controlled affiliates. All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated. NNN applies the equity method of accounting to investments in partnerships and joint ventures that are not subject to control by NNN due to the significance of rights held by other parties.

 

55


Table of Contents

The TRS develops real estate through various joint venture development affiliate agreements. NNN consolidates the joint venture development entities listed in the table below based upon either NNN being the primary beneficiary of the respective variable interest entity or NNN having a controlling interest over the respective entity. NNN eliminates significant intercompany balances and transactions and records a minority interest for its other partners’ ownership percentage. The following table summarizes each of the investments as of December 31, 2008:

 

Date of Agreement

  

Entity Name

  TRS’
    Ownership %    

November 2002

  WG Grand Prairie TX, LLC  60%

February 2003

  Gator Pearson, LLC  50%

February 2004

  CNLRS Yosemite Park CO, LLC  50%

September 2004

  CNLRS Bismarck ND, LLC  50%

February 2006

  CNLRS BEP, L.P.  50%

February 2006

  CNLRS Rockwall, L.P.  50%

September 2006

  NNN Harrison Crossing, L.P.  50%

September 2006

  CNLRS RGI Bonita Springs, LLC  50%

NNN no longer holds an interest in the collective partnership interest of CNL Plaza, Ltd. and CNL Plaza Venture, Ltd. (collectively, “Plaza”). In October 2006, NNN sold its equity investment for $10,239,000 (see Note 4).

In September 2007, NNN entered into a joint venture, NNN Retail Properties Fund I LLC (the “NNN Crow JV”) with an affiliate of Crow Holdings Realty Partners IV, LP (see Note 4).

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.

Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease – In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141”), the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired leased property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on the determination of the relative fair values of these assets. The as-if-vacant fair value of a property is provided to management by a qualified appraiser.

In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded as other assets or liabilities based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases, and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the

 

56


Table of Contents

corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term.

The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, consisting of in-place leases, is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental rates over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as-if-vacant, determined as set forth above. The value of in-place leases exclusive of the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be written off.

The value of tenant relationships is reviewed on individual transactions to determine if future value was derived from the acquisition.

Real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:

Operating method – Leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rentals vary during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.

Direct financing method – Leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio – The TRS acquires and/or develops and owns properties for the purpose of selling the real estate. The properties that are classified as held for sale at any given time may consist of properties that have been acquired in the marketplace with the intent to sell and properties that have been, or are currently being, constructed by the TRS. The TRS records the acquisition of the real estate at cost, including the acquisition and closing costs. The cost of the real estate developed by the TRS includes direct and indirect costs of construction, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. Real estate held for sale is not depreciated. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the TRS classifies its real estate held for sale as discontinued operations for each property in which rental revenues are generated.

 

57


Table of Contents

Impairment – Real Estate – Management periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Real Estate Dispositions – When real estate is disposed of, the related cost, accumulated depreciation or amortization and any accrued rental income for operating leases and the net investment for direct financing leases are removed from the accounts and gains and losses from the dispositions are reflected in income. Gains from the disposition of real estate are generally recognized using the full accrual method in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 66 “Accounting for Real Estate Sales,” provided that various criteria relating to the terms of the sale and any subsequent involvement by NNN with the real estate sold are met. Lease termination fees are recognized when the related leases are cancelled and NNN no longer has a continuing obligation to provide services to the former tenants.

Valuation of Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest – The allowance related to the mortgages, notes and accrued interest is NNN’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses. The allowance is determined on an individual note basis in reviewing any payment past due for over 90 days. Any outstanding amounts are written off against the allowance when all possible means of collection have been exhausted.

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates – NNN accounts for each of its investments in unconsolidated affiliates under the equity method of accounting (see Note 4).

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, at Fair Value – Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The commercial mortgage residual interests were acquired in connection with the acquisition of 78.9 percent equity interest of Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”). NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value. Certain of the commercial mortgage residual interests were pledged as security for notes payable.

Cash and Cash Equivalents – NNN considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and money market accounts. Cash equivalents are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.

Cash accounts maintained on behalf of NNN in demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds may exceed federally insured levels; however, NNN has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

 

58


Table of Contents

Valuation of Receivables – NNN estimates of the collectibility of its accounts receivable related to rents, expense reimbursements and other revenues. NNN analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, customer credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants in bankruptcy are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims.

Debt Costs – Debt costs incurred in connection with NNN’s $400,000,000 line of credit and mortgages payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective loan commitment using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. Debt costs incurred in connection with the issuance of NNN’s notes payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective debt obligation using the effective interest method.

Revenue Recognition – Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with SFAS 13, “Accounting for Leases,” based on the terms of the lease at the time of acquisition of the leased asset. Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant.

Earnings Per Share – Basic net earnings per share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders for the period by the number of common shares that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares for all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the periods.

The following is a reconciliation of the denominator of the basic net earnings per common share computation to the denominator of the diluted net earnings per common share computation for each of the years ended December 31:

 

   2008  2007  2006 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding

  74,732,844  66,519,519  57,698,533 

Unvested restricted stock

  (483,707) (367,082) (270,470)
          

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share

  74,249,137  66,152,437  57,428,063 
          

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share

  74,249,137  66,152,437  57,428,063 

Effect of dilutive securities:

    

Restricted stock

  177,678  143,550  114,367 

Common stock options

  35,900  69,040  107,909 

Assumed conversion of Series B convertible preferred stock to common stock

  -    -    400,607 

Directors’ deferred fee plan

  59,194  42,503  28,929 
          

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in diluted earnings per share

  74,521,909  66,407,530  58,079,875 
          

In April 2006, the Series B Convertible Preferred shares were converted into 1,293,996 shares of common stock and therefore are included in the computation of both basic and diluted

 

59


Table of Contents

weighted average shares outstanding. In addition, the potential dilutive shares related to convertible notes payable were not included in computing earnings per common share because their effects would be antidilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation – On January 1, 2006, NNN adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (R), “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123R”), under the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized for all awards granted after the adoption of this standard and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that are outstanding as of that date. In accordance with SFAS 123R, NNN estimates the fair value of restricted stock and stock option grants at the date of grant and amortizes those amounts into expense on a straight line basis or amount vested, if greater, over the appropriate vesting period. Adoption of SFAS 123R did not have a significant impact on NNN’s earnings from continuing operations, net earnings, cash flow from operations, cash flow from financing activities and basic and diluted earnings per share for the years following the adoption of SFAS 123R provisions.

Income Taxes – NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and related regulations. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, providing it distributes 100 percent of its real estate investment trust taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.

NNN and its taxable REIT subsidiaries have made timely TRS elections pursuant to the provisions of the REIT Modernization Act. A TRS is able to engage in activities resulting in income that previously would have been disqualified from being eligible REIT income under the federal income tax regulations. As a result, certain activities of NNN which occur within its TRS entities are subject to federal and state income taxes (See Note 3). All provisions for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are attributable to NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries and to OAMI’s built-in-gain tax liability.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method as required by SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the temporary differences based on estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

New Accounting Standards – In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”) the objective of which is to improve and simplify the accounting for business combinations. This statement requires the new acquiring entity to recognize all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combination transactions; establishes an acquisition-date fair value for said assets and liabilities; and requires full disclosure of the financial effect of the

 

60


Table of Contents

acquisition. SFAS 141(R) excludes joint ventures and common control transactions. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and should be applied prospectively. The adoption of SFAS 141(R) will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” (“SFAS 160”), an amendment to Accounting Research Board No. 51. The objective of SFAS 160 is to improve the relevance, comparability and transparency of financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and should be applied prospectively. The adoption of SFAS 160 will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 140-3, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions” (“FSP 140-3”), to provide guidance for determining whether or not these transactions should be considered a linked transaction for the purposes of assessing whether sale accounting is appropriate under SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities” (“SFAS 140”). For transactions within its scope, FSP 140-3 presumes that an initial transfer of a financial asset and a repurchase financing are considered part of the same arrangement, as a linked transaction. However, if certain criteria are met, the initial transfer and repurchase financing should not be evaluated as a linked transaction and should be evaluated separately under SFAS 140. This FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is not permitted. The adoption of FSP 140-3 will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, (“SFAS 161”), “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,” “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). SFAS 161 provides for enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivatives and how and where those derivatives and related hedged items are reported in the entity’s financial statements. The statement requires disclosure of the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a tabular format and the cross referencing in footnotes to enable financial statement users to locate important information about derivative instruments. SFAS 161 applies to all entities and all derivative instruments and related hedged items accounted for under SFAS 133. SFAS 161 is effective prospectively for the financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. Early application is encouraged. The adoption of SFAS 161 will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)” (“FSP APB 14-1”), which requires the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) to be separately accounted for in a manner that reflects the issuer’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate. FSP APB 14-1 requires the debt component to be recorded based upon the estimated fair value of similar non-convertible debt. The resulting debt discount would be

 

61


Table of Contents

amortized over the period during which the debt is expected to be outstanding as additional non-cash interest expense. FSP APB 14-1 will become effective beginning in NNN’s first quarter of 2009 and is required to be applied retrospectively to all presented periods, as applicable. The adoption of FSP APB 14-1 is expected to result in the recognition of additional non-cash interest expense of approximately $5.5 and $2.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $6.0 million for the year ending December 31, 2009.

In May 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS 162”), the objective of which is to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for non-governmental entities. SFAS 162 became effective 60 days following the Commission’s approval on September 16, 2008 of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing (“PCAOB”) amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The adoption of SFAS 162 did not have an impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2008, FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (“FSP 03-6-1”), which addresses whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and therefore need to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share (“EPS”) under the two-class method as discussed in SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” This FSP is effective for financial statements issued for the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those years. All prior period EPS data presented shall be adjusted retrospectively (including interim financial statements, summaries of earnings, and selected financial data) to conform with the provision of this FSP. The adoption of this FSP will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In September 2008, FASB issued FSP No. FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4, “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161” (“FSP 133-1”). FSP 133-1 amends SFAS 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45 “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees.” The objective of this FSP is to require additional disclosures in order to adequately address the potential adverse effects of changes in credit risk on financial position, financial performance, and cash flows of the sellers of credit derivatives and certain guarantees. The provisions of FSP 133-1 is effective for reporting periods (annual or interim) ending after November 15, 2008, and earlier application is encouraged to facilitate comparisons at initial adoption. This FSP requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending subsequent to initial adoption. The adoption of FSP 133-1 will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In October 2008, FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When The Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP 157-3”) in order to provide clarity and give examples on how fair market value should be determined in an illiquid or non-active

 

62


Table of Contents

market. The FSP is effective upon issuance and for prior periods for which financial statements have not been issued. FSP 157-3 requires that revisions resulting from a change in valuation technique or application shall be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate under SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections.” The adoption of FSP 157-3 did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In December 2008, FASB issued FSP No. FAS 140-4 and FIN 46(R)-8, “Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest Entities” (“FSP 140-4”). Among other requirements, this FSP calls for public entities to provide additional disclosures about transferors’ continuing involvements with transferred financial assets. This FSP is effective for the first reporting period (interim or annual) ending after December 15, 2008, and earlier application is encouraged. The adoption of FSP 140-4 will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In November 2008, FASB ratified EITF No. 08-6, “Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations” (“EITF 08-6”), which clarifies accounting and impairment considerations involving equity method investments after the effective date of both SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160. EITF 08-6 addresses questions relating to how revised business combinations and non-controlling interests in accounting will impact equity method investments. EITF 08-6 is effective on a prospective basis for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of EITF 08-6 will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In November 2008, FASB ratified EITF No. 08-8, “Accounting for an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) with a Settlement Amount That Is Based on the Stock of an Entity’s Consolidated Subsidiary” (“EITF 08-8”). EITF 08-8 clarifies whether a financial instrument, within the scope of this Issue, is not precluded from being indexed to an entity’s stock in the parent’s consolidated financial statements. EITF 08-8 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and for interim periods in those fiscal years. The adoption of EITF 08-8 will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

Use of Estimates – Management of NNN has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant estimates include provision for impairment and allowances for certain assets, accruals, useful lives of assets and capitalization of costs. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassification – Certain items in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2008 presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on stockholders’ equity or net earnings.

Note 2 – Real Estate – Investment Portfolio:

Leases – NNN generally leases its Investment Properties to established tenants. As of December 31, 2008, 990 of the Investment Property leases have been classified as operating leases and 20 leases have been classified as direct financing leases. For the Investment Property leases classified as direct financing leases, the building portions of the property leases are accounted for as direct financing leases while the land portions of six of these leases are

 

63


Table of Contents

accounted for as operating leases. Substantially all leases have initial terms of 10 to 20 years (expiring between 2009 and 2029) and provide for minimum rentals. In addition, the leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. Generally, the tenant is also required to pay all property taxes and assessments, substantially maintain the interior and exterior of the building and carry property and liability insurance coverage. Certain of NNN’s Investment Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for certain costs and expenses of the property. As of December 31, 2008, the weighted average remaining lease term was approximately 13 years. Generally, the leases of the Investment Properties provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions as the initial lease.

Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Operating Method – Real estate subject to operating leases consisted of the following as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007 

Land and improvements

  $    1,057,757  $938,804 

Buildings and improvements

   1,406,121   1,201,999 

Leasehold interests

   2,532   2,532 
         
   2,466,410   2,143,335 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (146,296)  (111,087)
         
   2,320,114   2,032,248 

Work in progress

   40,785   25,556 
         
   2,360,899   2,057,804 

Less impairment

   (3,005)  (1,958)
         
  $2,357,894  $    2,055,846 
         

Some leases provide for scheduled rent increases throughout the lease term. Such amounts are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, NNN recognized collectively in continuing and discontinued operations, $1,020,000, $2,672,000, and $3,160,000, respectively, of such income. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the balance of accrued rental income, net of allowances of $4,144,000 and $3,077,000, respectively, was $23,972,000 and $24,652,000, respectively.

In connection with the development of 21 Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction and land costs) of $97,690,000. As of December 31, 2008, NNN has funded $70,451,000 of this commitment, with $27,239,000 remaining to be funded.

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on noncancellable operating leases at December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):

 

2009

  $ 214,251

2010

   210,574

2011

   206,562

2012

   201,508

2013

   193,143

Thereafter

   1,880,833
    
  $    2,906,871
    

 

64


Table of Contents

Since lease renewal periods are exercisable at the option of the tenant, the above table only presents future minimum lease payments due during the initial lease terms. In addition, this table does not include amounts for potential variable rent increases that are based on the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) or future contingent rents which may be received on the leases based on a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales.

Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Direct Financing Method – The following lists the components of net investment in direct financing leases at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007 

Minimum lease payments to be received

  $43,275  $54,967 

Estimated unguaranteed residual values

   11,755   13,622 

Less unearned income

   (23,790)  (31,092)
         

Net investment in direct financing leases

  $31,240  $37,497 
         

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on direct financing leases held for investment at December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):

 

2009

  $ 4,339

2010

   4,358

2011

   4,343

2012

   4,370

2013

   4,319

Thereafter

   21,546
    
  $    43,275
    

The above table does not include future minimum lease payments for renewal periods, potential variable CPI rent increases or contingent rental payments that may become due in future periods (See Real Estate – Accounted for Using the Operating Method).

Impairments – Real Estate – As a result of NNN’s review of long-lived assets including identifiable intangible assets, NNN recognized the following impairments for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007  2006

Continuing operations:

      

    Real estate

  $-  $128  $-

    Intangibles(1)

   -   288   -
            
   -   416   -

Discontinued operations:

      

    Real estate

   1,730   710   693
            
  $1,730  $1,126  $693
            

(1)     Included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

65


Table of Contents

Note 3 – Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio:

As of December 31, 2008, the TRS owned 32 Inventory Properties: 24 completed inventory, one under construction and seven land parcels. As of December 31, 2007, the TRS owned 56 Inventory Properties: 41 completed inventory, nine under construction and six land parcels. The real estate Inventory Portfolio consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007 

Inventory:

   

Land

  $25,901  $65,983 

Building

   59,480   140,970 
         
   85,381   206,953 

Construction projects:

   

Land

   19,031   30,477 

Work in process

   1,469   12,025 
         
   20,500   42,502 

Less impairment

   (4,775)  (844)
         
  $    101,106  $    248,611 
         

In connection with the development of one Inventory Property by the TRS, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction and land costs) of $4,814,000. As of December 31, 2008, NNN has funded $2,212,000 of this commitment, with $2,602,000 remaining to be funded.

The following table summarizes the number of Inventory Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized on the disposition of Inventory Properties included in continuing and discontinued operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007  2006 
   # of
Properties
  Gain  # of
Properties
  Gain  # of
Properties
  Gain 

Continuing operations

  1  $21  2  $332  6  $8,000 

Minority interest

     (10)    -     (3,609)
                   

Total continuing operations

     11     332     4,391 
                   

Discontinued operations

  24   12,315  69   10,957  58   5,590 

Intersegment eliminations

     329     844     190 

Minority interest

     (3,297)    (1,120)    (505)
                   

Total discontinued operations

     9,347     10,681     5,275 
                      
  25  $    9,358  71  $    11,013  64  $    9,666 
                      

Note 4 – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates:

Crow Holdings.  In September 2007, NNN entered into a joint venture, NNN Retail Properties Fund I LLC (the “NNN Crow JV”), with an affiliate of Crow Holdings Realty Partners IV, L.P. NNN Crow JV owns real estate assets leased to convenience store operators from unrelated third parties. NNN owns a 15 percent equity interest in the joint venture which it accounts for under the equity method of accounting. Net income and losses of the joint venture are allocated to the members in accordance with their respective percentage interest. For the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, NNN recognized equity in earnings of $364,000 and $49,000, respectively, for NNN Crow JV. NNN manages the joint venture pursuant to a management

 

66


Table of Contents

agreement and earned certain fees of $531,000 and $21,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, in accordance with the terms of the joint venture agreement, NNN loaned $2,749,000 to NNN Crow JV at an interest rate of 7.75%. The loan balance was repaid in full in November 2007.

CNL Plaza.  In May 2002, NNN purchased a 25 percent partnership interest in CNL Plaza Ltd. and CNL Plaza Venture Ltd. (collectively “Plaza”) for $750,000. The remaining partnership interests in Plaza were owned by affiliates of James M. Seneff, Jr. and Robert A. Bourne, each a former member of NNN’s Board of Directors. Plaza owned a 346,000 square foot office building and an interest in an adjacent parking garage. NNN had severally guaranteed 41.67 percent of a $14,000,000 unsecured promissory note on behalf of Plaza. In October 2006, NNN sold its equity investment in Plaza for $10,239,000 and recognized a gain of $11,373,000. In connection with the sale, NNN was released as guarantor of Plaza’s $14,000,000 unsecured promissory note.

During the year ended December 31, 2006, NNN received $1,042,000 in distributions from Plaza and recognized earnings from Plaza of $122,000. NNN did not receive any distributions or recognize earnings from Plaza during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

Since November 1999, NNN has leased its headquarters office space from Plaza. NNN’s lease expires in October 2014. In October 2006, NNN amended its lease with Plaza to reduce the square footage leased by NNN. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, NNN incurred rental expenses in connection with the lease of $981,000, $938,000 and $1,024,000, respectively. In May 2000, NNN subleased a portion of its office space to affiliates of James M. Seneff, Jr. In October 2006, NNN terminated these subleases in connection with NNN’s amendment. During the year ended December 31, 2006, NNN earned $337,000 in rental and accrued rental income from these affiliates.

The following is a schedule of NNN’s future minimum lease payments related to the office space leased from Plaza at December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):

 

2009

  $ 865

2010

   891

2011

   917

2012

   945

2013

   973

Thereafter

   831
    
  $    5,422
    

Since lease renewal periods are exercisable at the option of the tenant, the above table only presents future minimum lease payments due during the initial lease terms. NNN has the option to renew its lease with Plaza for three successive five-year periods subject to similar terms and conditions as the initial lease.

 

67


Table of Contents

Note 5 – Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest Receivable:

Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007 

Mortgages and notes receivable

  $55,495  $58,556 

Structured finance investments

   4,514   14,359 

Accrued interest receivables

   387   578 

Unamortized premium

   84   165 
         
   60,480   73,658 

Less loan origination fees, net

   (8)  (100)

Less allowance

   -   (396)
         
  $    60,472  $    73,162 
         

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Structured finance investments are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate.

Note 6 – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests:

OAMI holds the commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven securitizations. The following table summarizes the investment interests in each of the transactions:

 

   Investment Interest

Securitization

  Company(1)  OAMI(2)  3rd Party

BYL 99-1

  -  59.0%  41.0%

CCMH I, LLC

  42.7%  57.3%  -

CCMH II, LLC

  44.0%  56.0%  -

CCMH III, LLC

  36.7%  63.3%  -

CCMH IV, LLC

  38.3%  61.7%  -

CCMH V, LLC

  38.4%  61.6%  -

CCMH VI, LLC

  -  100.0%  -

(1)     NNN owned these investment interests prior to its acquisition of the equity interest in OAMI.

(2)     NNN owns 78.9 percent of OAMI’s investment interest.

Each of the Residuals is recorded at fair value based upon an independent valuation. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity, and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. Due to changes in market conditions relating to residual assets, the independent valuation increased the discount rate from 17% to 25% during the third quarter in 2007. In 2006, as a result of the increase in historical prepayments the independent valuation changed the assumption in future prepayments.

 

68


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008      2007      2006

Unrealized gains

  $    2,009  $-  $-

Unrealized losses

   -   326   -

Other than temporary valuation impairment

   758           638       8,779

The following table summarizes the key assumptions used in determining the value of these assets as of December 31:

 

   2008  2007

Discount rate

  25%  25%

Average life equivalent CPR speeds range

  31.7% to 39.4% CPR  33.0% to 45.7% CPR

Foreclosures:

    

    Frequency curve default model

  1.1% maximum rate  1.1% maximum rate

    Loss severity of loans in foreclosure

  10%  10%

Yield:

    

    LIBOR

  Forward 3 month curve  Forward 3-month curve

    Prime

  Forward curve  Forward curve

The following table shows the effects on the key assumptions affecting the fair value of the Residuals at December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands).

 

   Residuals

Carrying amount of retained interests

  $    22,000

Discount rate assumption:

  

    Fair value at 27% discount rate

  $21,585

    Fair value at 30% discount rate

  $20,987

Prepayment speed assumption:

  

    Fair value of 1% increases above the CPR Index

  $21,979

    Fair value of 2% increases above the CPR Index

  $21,959

Expected credit losses:

  

    Fair value 2% adverse change

  $21,994

    Fair value 3% adverse change

  $21,992

Yield Assumptions:

  

    Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 25 basis points

  $22,253

    Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 50 basis points

  $22,523

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on adverse variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation of a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumptions; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

 

69


Table of Contents

Note 7 – Line of Credit Payable:

In October 2007, NNN exercised the $100,000,000 accordion feature of its existing revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) increasing the borrowing capacity to $400,000,000 from $300,000,000. Additionally, in October 2008, NNN exercised the option to extend the maturity date by twelve months from May 2009 to May 2010. The current terms of the Credit Facility provide for (i) a tiered interest rate structure of a maximum of 112.5 basis points above LIBOR (as a result of an upgrade in NNN’s debt rating in June 2008, NNN’s current interest rate is 65 basis points above LIBOR), (ii) requires NNN to pay a commitment fee based on a tiered rate structure to a maximum of 25 basis points per annum (based upon the debt rating of NNN, the current commitment fee is 20 basis points), (iii) provides for a competitive bid option for up to 50 percent of the facility amount and (iv) expires on May 8, 2010. The principal balance is due in full upon expiration.

As of December 31, 2008, $26,500,000 was outstanding and approximately $373,500,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $1,265,000. The Credit Facility had a weighted average interest rate of 3.83% and 6.24% for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) maximum leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage and (iv) investment and dividend limitations. At December 31, 2008, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

The following table outlines interest expense as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007  2006

Interest expense:

      

    Capitalized as a cost of building construction

  $2,014  $3,718  $2,278

    Charged to operations

   1,420   2,219   5,032
            
  $    3,434  $    5,937  $    7,310
            

Note 8 – Mortgages Payable:

The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):

 

Entered

  Balance  Interest
Rate
  Maturity(3)  Carrying
Value of
Encumbered
Asset(s)
(1)
  Outstanding Principal
Balance at December 31,
          2008  2007

June 1996(2)(4)

  $    1,916  8.25%  December 2008  $-  $-  $263

December 1999

   350  8.50%  December 2009   3,227   49   95

December 2001(2)

   623  9.00%  April 2014   900   315   358

December 2001(2)

   698  9.00%  April 2019   1,304   418   441

December 2001(2)

   485  9.00%  April 2019   1,274   214   226

June 2002

   21,000  6.90%  July 2012   25,097   19,477   19,759

February 2004(2)

   6,952  6.90%  January 2017   12,006   5,036   5,487

March 2005(2)

   1,015  8.14%  September 2016   1,360   781   851
                  
        $       45,168  $    26,290  $    27,480
                  

 

70


Table of Contents
 

(1)

Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of NNN’s properties. The carrying values of the assets are as of December 31, 2008.

 

(2)

Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan. The corresponding original principal balance represents the outstanding principal balance at the time of acquisition.

 

(3)

Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.

 

(4)

In December 2008, upon maturity, NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance and the property was released from the mortgage lien. This was a self-amortizing mortgage.

The following is a schedule of the annual maturities of NNN’s mortgages payable at December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):

 

2009

  $ 1,001

2010

   1,022

2011

   1,098

2012

   19,291

2013

   863

Thereafter

   3,015
    
  $    26,290
    

Note 9 – Note Payable – Secured:

NNN’s consolidated financial statements include the following note payable, resulting from the acquisition of OAMI (dollars in thousands):

 

   Outstanding Principal
Balance at December 31,
  Stated
Rate
  Maturity
Date
       2008          2007        

03-1 Note(1)(2)

  $                  -  $      12,000  10%  June 2008

 

 

(1)

NNN repaid the outstanding principal amount in February 2008.

 

(2)

Secured by certain equity investments in commercial mortgage residual interests of NNN with a carrying value of $5,445.

Note 10 – Notes Payable – Convertible:

Each of NNN’s outstanding series of convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

 

Convertible

Senior

Notes

 

Issue Date

 Original
Principal
 Net
Proceeds
 Effective
Interest
Rate
 Debt
Issuance
Costs
  Earliest
Conversion Date
 Earliest Put
Option Date
 Maturity Date

2026(1)(2)(4)

 September 2006 $  172,500 $    168,650 3.950% $    3,850(3) September 2025 September 2011 September 2026

2028(2)(5)

 March 2008  234,035  228,576 5.125%  5,459  June 2027 June 2013 June 2028

 

(1)

NNN repurchased $25,000 in November 2008 for a purchase price of $19,188.

(2)

Debt issuance costs include underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the period to the earliest put option date of the holders using the effective interest method.

(3)

Includes $356 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $25,000 of the 2026 Notes.

(4)

The conversion rate per $1,000 principal amount was 41.2951 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $24.2159 per share of common stock.

(5)

The conversion rate per $1,000 principal amount was 39.3459 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $25.42 per share of common stock.

Each series of convertible notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of the Company. Each note is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount

 

71


Table of Contents

of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through but not including the redemption date and (ii) the make whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

Note 11 – Notes Payable:

Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands).

 

Notes

  

Issue Date

  Principal  Discount(3)  Net
Price
  Stated
Rate
  Effective
Rate(4)
  

Maturity

Date

2010(1)

  September 2000  $    20,000  $            126  $    19,874  8.500%  8.595%  September 2010

2012(1)

  June 2002   50,000   287   49,713  7.750%  7.833%  June 2012

2014(1)(2)(5)

  June 2004   150,000   440   149,560  6.250%  5.910%  June 2014

2015(1)

  November 2005   150,000   390   149,610  6.150%  6.185%  December 2015

2017(6)

  September 2007   250,000   877   249,123  6.875%  6.924%  October 2017

 

(1)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility.

(2)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to repay the obligation of the 2004 Notes.

(3)

The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.

(4)

Includes the effects of the discount, treasury lock gain and swap gain (as applicable).

(5)

NNN entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement which fixed a swap rate of 4.61% on a notional amount of $94,000. Upon issuance of the 2014 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting interest rate swap agreement resulting in a gain of $4,148. The gain has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2014 Notes using the effective interest method.

(6)

NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of $3,260, of which $3,228 was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.

Each series of the notes represent senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. Each of the notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

In connection with the debt offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling $5,459,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.

In accordance with the terms of the indenture, pursuant to which NNN’s notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios and (ii) certain interest coverage. At December 31, 2008, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

 

72


Table of Contents

Note 12 – Preferred Stock:

The following table outlines each issuance of NNN’s preferred stock (dollars in thousands):

 

Non-Voting Preferred Stock Issuance

  Shares
Outstanding
At
December 31,
2008
  Liquidation
Preference
(per share)
  Fixed Annual
Cash
Distribution
(per share)

9% Series A

  -  $            25.00  $        2.25000

7.375% Series C Redeemable Depositary Shares

  3,680,000   25.00   1.84375

9% Non-Voting Series A Preferred Stock.  In December 2001, NNN issued 1,999,974 shares of 9% Non-Voting Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”). Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the board of directors, cumulative preferential cash distributions at a rate of nine percent of the $25.00 liquidation preference per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $2.25 per share). The Series A Preferred Stock ranked senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN.

In January 2007, NNN redeemed all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all accumulated and unpaid distributions through the redemption date of $0.20625 per share.

7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.  In October 2006, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 3,200,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and received gross proceeds of $80,000,000. In addition, NNN issued an additional 480,000 depositary shares in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received gross proceeds of $12,000,000. In connection with this offering NNN incurred stock issuance costs of approximately $3,098,000, consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

Holders of the depositary shares are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the board of directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 7.375% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per depositary share per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $1.84375 per depositary share). The Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares ranks senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. NNN may redeem the Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares on or after October 12, 2011, for cash, at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends.

Note 13 – Common Stock:

In March 2007, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $24.70 per share and received net proceeds of $118,020,000. Subsequently, in April 2007, NNN issued an additional 750,000 shares of common stock in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received net proceeds of $17,730,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $6,217,000, consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

 

73


Table of Contents

In June 2007, NNN filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) which permits the issuance by NNN of up to 5,900,000 shares of common stock pursuant to NNN’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan.

In October 2007, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $25.94 per share and received net proceeds of $99,150,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $4,874,000, consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

In October 2008, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 3,450,000 shares (including 450,000 shares in connection with the underwriters’ over allotment) of common stock at a price of $23.05 per share and received net proceeds of $75,958,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $3,565,000, consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, and legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.  In February 2006, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission for its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”) which permits the issuance by NNN of 12,191,394 shares of common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the DRIP for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007

Shares of common stock

       2,146,640       2,645,257

Net proceeds

  $47,372  $62,980

Note 14 – Employee Benefit Plan:

Effective January 1, 1998, NNN adopted a defined contribution retirement plan (the “Retirement Plan”) covering substantially all of the employees of NNN. The Retirement Plan permits participants to defer up to a maximum of 60 percent of their compensation, as defined in the Retirement Plan, subject to limits established by the Internal Revenue Code. NNN matches 60 percent of the participants’ contributions up to a maximum of eight percent of a participant’s annual compensation. NNN’s contributions to the Retirement Plan for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 totaled $385,000, $428,000, and $248,000, respectively.

Note 15 – Dividends:

The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of common stock dividends paid to stockholders for the years ended December 31:

 

       2008          2007          2006    

Ordinary dividends

  $1.480000  $1.397402  $1.150780

Qualified dividends

   -   0.000414   -

Capital gain

   -   0.002184   0.150261

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

   -   -   0.018959
            
  $    1.480000  $    1.400000  $    1.320000
            

 

74


Table of Contents

The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of preferred stock dividends per share paid to stockholders for the year ended December 31:

 

   Total  Ordinary
Dividends
  Qualified
Dividend
  Capital Gain  Unrecaptured
Section 1250
Gain

2008:

          

    Series C

  $    1.843750  $    1.843750  $-  $-  $-

2007:

          

    Series A(1)

   0.206250   0.205867       0.000061       0.000322   -

    Series C

   1.843750   1.840328   0.000546   0.002876   -

2006:

          

    Series A

   2.250000   1.961557   -   0.256127       0.032316

    Series B Convertible(1)

   41.875000   36.506800   -   4.766800   0.601400

    Series C(2)

   0.250955   0.218784   -   0.028567   0.003604

 

 

(1)

Shares of Series A and Series B preferred are no longer outstanding.

 

(2)

Issued in October 2006.

Note 16 – Restructuring Costs:

During the year ended December 31, 2006, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $1,580,000, which included severance costs and accelerated vesting of restricted stock in connection with a workforce reduction in April 2006.

Note 17 – Income Taxes:

In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

NNN is subject to the provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007, and has analyzed its various federal and state filing positions. NNN believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions are well documented and supported. Additionally, NNN believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to FIN 48. In addition, NNN did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of FIN 48.

NNN has had no increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits for current or prior years since the date of adoption. Further, no interest or penalties have been included since no reserves were recorded and no significant increases or decreases are expected to occur within the next 12 months. When applicable, such interest and penalties will be recorded in non-operating expenses. The periods that remain open under federal statute are 2005 through 2008. NNN also files in many states with varying open years under statute.

For income tax purposes, NNN has taxable REIT subsidiaries in which certain real estate activities are conducted. Additionally, in May 2005, NNN acquired a 78.9 percent equity

 

75


Table of Contents

interest in OAMI, and has consolidated OAMI in its financial statements. OAMI, upon making its REIT election, has remaining tax liabilities relating to the built-in gain of its assets.

NNN treats some depreciation expense and certain other items differently for tax than for financial reporting purposes. The principal differences between NNN’s effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and the statutory rates relate to state taxes and nondeductible expenses such as meals and entertainment expenses.

The components of the net income tax asset (liability) consist of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007 

Temporary differences:

   

    Built-in gain

  $(5,195) $(6,768)

    Depreciation

   (723)  (632)

    Other

   (332)  (314)

    Reserves

   1,894   393 

Excess interest expense carryforward

   5,721   5,676 

Net operating loss carryforward

   2,717   134 
         

Net deferred income tax asset (liability)

  $4,082  $(1,511)

    Current income tax asset (payable)

   982   (160)
         

Income tax asset (liability)

  $5,064  $(1,671)
         

In assessing the ability to realize a deferred tax asset, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The net operating loss carryforwards were generated by NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries. The net operating loss carryforwards expire in 2027. Based upon the level of historical taxable income, projections for future taxable income, and tax strategies available to NNN over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that NNN will realize all of the benefits of these deductible differences that existed as of December 31, 2008.

The income tax (expense) benefit consists of the following components for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007  2006 

Net earnings before income taxes

  $    119,788  $    153,849  $    176,283 

Provision for income tax benefit (expense):

    

Current:

    

Federal

   (1,936)  (1,120)  (1,805)

State and local

   (364)  (209)  (339)

Deferred:

    

Federal

   4,539   3,570   6,493 

State and local

   1,055   1,020   1,873 
             

Total benefit for income taxes

   3,294   3,261   6,222 
             

Total net earnings

  $123,082  $157,110  $182,505 
             

 

76


Table of Contents

Note 18 – Earnings from Discontinued Operations:

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – In accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” NNN has classified the revenues and expenses related to (i) all Investment Properties that were sold and expired leasehold interests, and (ii) any Investment Property that was held for sale as of December 31, 2008, as discontinued operations. The following is a summary of the earnings from discontinued operations from the Investment Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007  2006 

Revenues:

    

Rental income from operating leases

  $2,815  $9,086  $23,913 

Earned income from direct financing leases

   100   2,695   5,991 

Percentage rent

   25   147   215 

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

   51   351   1,127 

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

   1,528   866   334 
             
   4,519   13,145   31,580 
             

Operating expenses:

    

General and administrative

   (77)  (44)  98 

Real estate

   (60)  459   3,035 

Depreciation and amortization

   433   1,065   2,805 

Impairments – real estate

   1,730   710   693 
             
   2,026   2,190   6,631 
             

Other expenses (revenues):

    

Interest and other income

   (3)  (3)  - 

Interest expense

   -   -   1,816 
             
   (3)  (3)  1,816 
             

Earnings before gain on disposition of real estate and loss on extinguishment of mortgage payable

   2,496   10,958   23,133 

Gain on disposition of real estate

   9,980   56,625   91,332 

Loss on extinguishment of mortgage payable

   -   -   (167)
             

Earnings from discontinued operations

  $    12,476  $    67,583  $    114,298 
             

 

77


Table of Contents

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio – NNN has classified the revenues and expenses related to (i) its Inventory Properties, which generated rental revenues prior to disposition, and (ii) the Inventory Properties which had generated rental revenues and were held for sale as of December 31, 2008, as discontinued operations. The following is a summary of the earnings from discontinued operations from the Inventory Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2008  2007  2006 

Revenues:

    

Rental income from operating leases

  $    10,626  $8,616  $9,235 

Percentage rent

   139   -   - 

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

   877   1,008   311 

Interest and other from real estate transactions

   916   224   336 
             
   12,558   9,848   9,882 
             

Disposition of real estate:

    

Gross proceeds

   151,713   164,338   80,856 

Costs

   (139,069)  (152,537)  (75,076)
             

Gain

   12,644   11,801   5,780 
             

Operating expenses:

    

General and administrative

   35   78   57 

Real estate

   1,523   1,509   394 

Depreciation and amortization

   226   68   8 

Impairments – real estate

   3,930   844   - 
             
   5,714   2,499   459 
             

Other expenses (revenues):

    

Interest and other income

   (8)  (5)  1 

Interest expense

   5,291   3,928   1,049 
             
   5,283   3,923   1,050 
             

Earnings before income tax expense and minority interest

   14,205   15,227   14,153 

Income tax expense

   (4,207)  (5,275)  (5,009)

Minority interest

   (3,122)  (1,331)  (958)
             

Earnings from discontinued operations

  $6,876  $    8,621  $    8,186 
             

Note 19 – Derivatives:

SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended and interpreted (“SFAS 133”), establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities. As required by SFAS 133, NNN records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

NNN’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, NNN primarily uses treasury locks and interest rate swaps as part of its cash flow hedging

 

78


Table of Contents

strategy. Treasury locks designated as cash flow hedges lock in the yield or price of a treasury security. Treasury locks are cash settled either as a cash inflow or outflow, depending on movements in interest rates. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable rate amounts in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying principal amount. To date, such derivatives have been used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with floating rate debt and forecasted interest payments of a forecasted issuance of debt.

For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings.

NNN may discontinue hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, the derivative is re-designated as a hedging instrument or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, NNN continues to carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, and recognizes any changes in its fair value in earnings or may choose to cash settle the derivative at that time.

In February 2008, NNN terminated its interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000,000 that was hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate hedge when terminated was a liability of $804,000, which NNN recorded as a loss on interest rate hedge.

In September 2007, NNN terminated two interest rate hedges with a combined notional amount of $100,000,000 that were hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate hedges when terminated was a liability of $3,260,000, of which $3,228,000 was deferred in other comprehensive income.

In June 2004, NNN terminated its forward-starting interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $94,000,000 that was hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate swaps when terminated was an asset of $4,148,000, which was deferred in other comprehensive income.

As of December 31, 2008, $391,000 remains in other comprehensive income related to the fair value of the interest rate hedges. During the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, NNN reclassified $162,000 and $309,000, respectively, out of other comprehensive income as a reduction to interest expense. During 2009, NNN estimates that an additional $159,000 will be reclassified to interest expense. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on NNN’s long-term debt.

 

79


Table of Contents

Additionally, NNN does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes or currently have any derivatives that are not designated as hedges. NNN had no derivative financial instruments outstanding at December 31, 2008.

Note 20 – Performance Incentive Plan:

In June 2007, NNN filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Securities and Exchange Commission which permits the issuance of up to 5,900,000 shares of common stock pursuant to NNN’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan replaces NNN’s previous Performance Incentive Plan. The 2007 Plan allows NNN to award or grant to key employees, directors and persons performing consulting or advisory services for NNN or its affiliates, stock options, stock awards, stock appreciation rights, Phantom Stock Awards, Performance Awards and Leveraged Stock Purchase Awards, each as defined in the 2007 Plan. The following summarizes NNN’s stock-based compensation activity for each of the years ended December 31:

 

   Number of Shares 
   2008  2007  2006 

Outstanding, January 1

  118,804  236,371  461,175 

Options granted

  -  -  - 

Options exercised

  (28,000) (82,767) (224,804)

Options surrendered

  (13,800) (34,800) - 
          

Outstanding, December 31

  77,004  118,804  236,371 
          

Exercisable, December 31

  77,004  118,804  236,371 
          

The following represents the weighted average option exercise price information for each of the years ended December 31:

 

   2008  2007  2006

Outstanding, January 1

  $    13.64  $    14.92  $    15.66

Granted during the year

   -   -   -

Exercised during the year

   11.17   16.12   16.43

Outstanding, December 31

   14.00   13.64   14.92

Exercisable, December 31

   14.00   13.64   14.92

The following summarizes the outstanding options and the exercisable options at December 31, 2008:

 

   Option Price Range
   $10.1875
to
  $13.2000  
  $14.5700
to
  $15.3200  
  Total

Outstanding options:

      

Number of shares

   24,600   52,404   77,004

Weighted-average exercise price

  $11.48  $15.18  $14.00

Weighted-average remaining contractual life in years

   2.12   3.57   3.11

Exercisable options:

      

Number of shares

   24,600   52,404   77,004

Weighted-average exercise price

  $        11.48  $        15.18  $        14.00

 

80


Table of Contents

One-third of the option grant to each individual becomes exercisable at the end of each of the first three years of service following the date of the grant and the options’ maximum term is 10 years. At December 31, 2008, the intrinsic value of options outstanding was $254,000. All options outstanding at December 31, 2008, were exercisable. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, NNN received proceeds totaling $313,000, $1,334,000 and $3,694,000, respectively, in connection with the exercise of options. NNN issued new common stock to satisfy share option exercises. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, was $327,000, $664,000 and $1,300,000, respectively.

Pursuant to the 2007 Plan, NNN has granted and issued shares of restricted stock to certain officers, directors and key associates of NNN. The following summarizes the activity for the year ended December 31, 2008, of such grants.

 

   Number
of

Shares
  Weighted
Average
Share Price

Non-vested restricted shares, January 1

  386,761  $        19.51

Restricted shares granted

  225,117   16.83

Restricted shares vested

  (100,518)  20.25

Restricted shares forfeited

  (2,520)  23.17
     

Non-vested restricted shares, December 31

  508,840   18.24
     

In May 2006, NNN accelerated the vesting and immediately vested 33,661 shares of restricted stock held by certain officers and resulted in the recognition of $557,000 of additional compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2006. These shares would have otherwise vested through January 2009.

During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, NNN cancelled 2,520 and 8,600 forfeited shares, respectively, of restricted stock. No restricted stock was forfeited in 2006.

Compensation expense for the restricted stock which is not tied to performance goals is determined based upon the fair value at the date of grant, assuming a 1.3% forfeiture rate, and is recognized as the greater of the amount amortized over a straight lined basis or the amount vested over the vesting periods. Vesting periods for officers and key associates of NNN range from four to seven years and generally vest yearly on a straight line basis. Vesting periods for directors are over a two year period and vest yearly on a straight line basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, NNN granted 79,000 performance based shares with a weighted average grant price of $12.94 to certain executive officers of NNN. The compensation expense for the grant is based upon the fair value of the grant calculated by a third party using a lattice model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate of 4.8%, (ii) a dividend rate of 5.3%, (iii) a term of five years, and (iv) volatility of 17.5%. Volatility is based upon the historical volatility of NNN’s stock and other factors. The term is assumed to be the vesting date for each tranche. The vesting of these shares is contingent upon achievement of certain performance goals by January 1, 2012.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, NNN granted 81,330 performance based shares with a weighted average grant price of $8.00 to certain executive officers of NNN. The compensation expense for the grant is based upon fair market value of the grant calculated by a

 

81


Table of Contents

third party using a lattice model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free rate of 3.48%, (ii) a dividend rate of 6.5%, (iii) a term of five years, and (iv) a volatility of 19.89%. Volatility is based upon the historical volatility of NNN’s stock and other factors. The vesting of these shares is contingent upon the achievement of certain performance goals by January 1, 2013.

The following summarizes other grants made during the year ended December 31, 2008, pursuant to the 2007 Plan.

 

       Shares      Weighted
Average
  Share Price  

Other share grants under the 2007 Plan:

    

Directors’ fees

  12,766  $        20.53

Deferred Directors’ fees

  26,846   19.71

Non-restricted grant

  400   21.63
     
  40,012   19.99
     

Shares available under the 2007 Plan for grant, end of period

  5,560,706  
     

The total compensation cost for share-based payments for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, totaled $3,341,000, $2,583,000 and $3,766,000, respectively, of such compensation expense. At December 31, 2008, NNN had $6,302,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements under the 2007 Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of three years.

Note 21 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

NNN believes the carrying value of its Credit Facility approximates fair value based upon its nature, terms and variable interest rate. NNN believes that the carrying value of its cash and cash equivalents, mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable, receivables, mortgages payable, note payable – secured, accrued interest payable and other liabilities at December 31, 2008 and 2007, approximate fair value based upon current market prices of similar issues. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the fair value of NNN’s notes payable and convertible notes, collectively, was $728,757,000 and $921,507,000, respectively, based upon the quoted market price.

Note 22 – Related Party Transactions:

See Note 4.

 

82


Table of Contents

Note 23 – Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited):

The following table outlines NNN’s quarterly financial data (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

 

2008

  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 

Revenues as originally reported

  $    55,200  $    57,026  $    58,573  $    57,244 

Reclassified to discontinued operations

   (946)  (497)  (84)  - 
                 

Adjusted revenue

  $54,254  $56,529  $58,489  $57,244 
                 

Net earnings

  $33,053  $30,887  $30,274  $28,868 
                 

Net earnings per share(1):

     

Basic

  $0.43  $0.40  $0.39  $0.35 

Diluted

   0.43   0.40   0.39   0.35 

2007

             

Revenues as originally reported

  $42,713  $46,421  $47,783  $52,565 

Reclassified to discontinued operations

   (3,974)  (2,057)  (1,318)  (1,258)
                 

Adjusted revenue

  $38,739  $44,364  $46,465  $51,307 
                 

Net earnings

  $26,704  $48,655  $47,386  $34,365 
                 

Net earnings per share(1):

     

Basic

  $0.41  $0.71  $0.68  $0.46 

Diluted

   0.41   0.70   0.68   0.46 

(1)     Calculated independently for each period and consequently, the sum of the quarters may differ from the annual amount.

 

83


Table of Contents

Note 24 – Segment Information:

NNN has identified two primary financial segments: (i) Investment Assets, and (ii) Inventory Assets. The following tables represent the segment data and reconciliation to NNN’s consolidated totals for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands):

 

2008

      Investment    
Assets
      Inventory    
Assets
      Eliminations    
(Intercompany)
      Consolidated    
Totals
 

External revenues

  $218,696  $176  $-  $218,872 

Intersegment revenues

   12,727   606   (13,333)  - 

Interest revenue

   6,728   28   -   6,756 

Interest revenue on Residuals

   4,636   -   -   4,636 

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   -   21   -   21 

Interest expense

   64,281   7,443   (13,241)  58,483 

Depreciation and amortization

   44,701   42   -   44,743 

Operating expenses

   25,827   9,573   -   35,400 

Impairments – real estate

   758   -   -   758 

Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated affiliate

   (2,203)  -   2,567   364 

Loss on interest rate hedge

   (804)  -   -   (804)

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   5,464   -   -   5,464 

Income tax benefit

   1,579   5,922   -   7,501 

Minority interest

   (650)  954   -   304 
                 

Earnings (loss) from continuing
operations

   110,606   (9,351)  2,475   103,730 

Earnings from discontinued operations

   12,476   6,548   328   19,352 
                 

Net earnings (loss)

  $123,082  $(2,803) $2,803  $123,082 
                 

Assets

  $        2,649,931  $        128,916  $            (129,485)  $          2,649,362 
                 

Additions to long-lived assets:

     

Real estate

  $352,618  $33,745  $-  $386,363 
                 

 

84


Table of Contents
2007    Investment  
Assets
    Inventory  
Assets
    Eliminations  
(Intercompany)
    Consolidated  
Totals
 

External revenues

  $171,954  $327  $-  $172,281 

Intersegment revenues

   15,851   -   (15,851)  - 

Interest revenue

   8,425   40   -   8,465 

Interest revenue Residuals

   4,882   -   -   4,882 

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   -   332   -   332 

Interest expense

   55,633   8,502   (14,849)  49,286 

Depreciation and amortization

   31,734   109   -   31,843 

Operating expenses

   23,943   7,702   (1)  31,644 

Impairments – real estate

   (927)  (127)  -   (1,054)

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates

   (1,334)  -   1,383   49 

Income tax benefit

   2,675   5,861   -   8,536 

Minority interest

   (689)  877   -   188 
                 

Earnings (loss) from continuing
operations

   89,527   (9,003)  382   80,906 

Earnings from discontinued operations

   67,583   7,777   844   76,204 
                 

Net earnings (loss)

  $157,110  $(1,226) $1,226  $157,110 
                 

Assets

  $    2,519,360  $      263,369  $        (243,124)  $        2,539,605 
                 

Additions to long-lived assets:

     

Real estate

  $677,101  $165,160  $-  $842,261 
                 

2006

     

External revenues

  $124,517  $441  $-  $124,958 

Intersegment revenues

   16,379   -   (16,379)  - 

Interest revenue

   7,129   61   -   7,190 

Interest revenue on Residuals

   7,268   -   -   7,268 

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   -   8,000   -   8,000 

Interest expense

   48,801   12,352   (15,281)  45,872 

Depreciation and amortization

   21,653   58   -   21,711 

Operating expenses

   21,914   10,183   (2)  32,095 

Impairments – real estate

   8,779   -   -   8,779 

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates

   (2,677)  -   2,799   122 

Gain on disposition of equity investment

   11,335   38   -   11,373 

Income tax benefit

   5,050   6,181   -   11,231 

Minority interest

   353   (2,017)  -   (1,664)
                 

Earnings (loss) from continuing
operations

   68,207   (9,889)  1,703   60,021 

Earnings from discontinued operations

   114,298   7,995   191   122,484 
                 

Net earnings (loss)

  $182,505  $(1,894) $1,894  $182,505 
                 

Assets

  $    1,910,003  $    242,466  $    (234,971)  $    1,917,498 
                 

Additions to long-lived assets:

     

Real estate

  $352,549  $195,956  $-  $548,505 
                 

 

85


Table of Contents

Note 25 – Fair Value Measurements:

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) relating to financial assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 specifies a hierarchy of valuation inputs which was established to increase consistency, clarity and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based upon three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, two of which are considered observable and one that is considered unobservable. The following describes the three levels:

 

  

Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

  

Level 2 – Valuation is based upon inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

  

Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

NNN currently values its Residuals based upon an independent valuation which provides a discounted cash flow analysis based upon prepayment speeds, expected loan losses and yield curves. These valuation inputs are generally considered unobservable; therefore, the Residuals are considered Level 3 financial assets. The table below presents a reconciliation of the Residuals during the year ended December 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands):

 

Balance at beginning of period

  $    24,340 

Total gains (losses) – realized/unrealized:

  

Included in earnings

   (758)

Included in other comprehensive income

   2,009 

Interest income on Residuals

   4,636 

Cash received from Residuals

   (8,227)

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net

   - 

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

   - 
     

Balance at end of period

  $22,000 
     

Changes in gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to a change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the end of period

  $581 
     

Note 26 – Major Tenants:

As of December 31, 2008, NNN did not have any tenant that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental and earned income.

Note 27 – Commitments and Contingencies:

As of December 31, 2008, NNN had letters of credit totaling $1,265,000 outstanding under its Credit Facility.

In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various other legal actions which management believes is routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.

 

86


Table of Contents

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Process for Assessment and Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financing Reporting.

NNN carried out an assessment as of December 31, 2008 of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting. This assessment was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Rules adopted by the Commission require NNN to present the conclusions of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer about the effectiveness of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the conclusions of NNN’s management about the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

CEO and CFO Certifications.  Included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forms of “Certification” of NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The forms of Certification are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K that stockholders are currently reading is the information concerning the assessment referred to in the Section 302 certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in NNN’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to NNN’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and affected by NNN’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

  

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of NNN’s assets;

 

  

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that NNN’s receipts and expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of management or the Board of Directors; and

 

87


Table of Contents
  

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of NNN’s assets that could have a material adverse effect on NNN’s financial statements.

Scope of the Assessments.    The assessment by NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the assessment by NNN’s management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting included a review of procedures and discussions with NNN’s management and others at NNN. In the course of the assessments, NNN sought to identify data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, were being undertaken.

NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is also assessed on an ongoing basis by personnel in NNN’s Accounting department and by NNN’s internal auditors in connection with their internal audit activities. The overall goals of these various assessment activities are to monitor NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting and to make modifications as necessary. NNN’s intent in this regard is that the disclosure controls and procedures and the internal control over financial reporting will be maintained and updated (including with improvements and corrections) as conditions warrant. Management also sought to deal with other control matters in the assessment, and in each case if a problem was identified, management considered what revision, improvement and/or correction was necessary to be made in accordance with NNN’s on-going procedures. The assessments of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is done on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning effectiveness of those controls can be reported in NNN’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Assessment of Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for NNN. Management used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework to assess the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting. Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2008, NNN’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Ernst & Young LLP, NNN’s independent registered public accounting firm, audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has issued an attestation report on NNN’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

88


Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During the three months ended December 31, 2008, there were no changes in NNN’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, NNN’s internal control for financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls.

Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures or NNN’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within NNN have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management’s override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Item 9B.  Other Information.

None.

 

89


Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Nominees,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Executive Officers,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Code of Business Conduct” and “Security Ownership,” and the information in such sections is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Compensation of Directors,” “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information,” and “Security Ownership,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and the information in such section is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Audit Committee Report” and “Proposal II: Proposal to Ratify Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

 

90


Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report.

 

(1)  FinancialStatements   
  

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  
  

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007

  
  Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006  
  Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006  
  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006  
  

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  
(2)  

FinancialStatement Schedules

  
  Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization and Notes as of December 31, 2008  
  Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate and Notes as of December 31,
2008
  

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

 

 (3)Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report.

 

 3.Articles of Incorporation and By-laws

 

 3.1First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 3.2Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 11, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 3.3Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

91


Table of Contents
 4.Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

 

 4.1Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.2Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.3Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated September 20, 2000, by and among Registrant and First Union National Bank, Trustee, relating to $20,000,000 of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.4Form of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.5Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of May 30, 2002, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $50,000,000 of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.6Form of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.7Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated as of June 18, 2004, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.8Form of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

92


Table of Contents
 4.9Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.10Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.11Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2006, between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.12Form of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.13Specimen certificate representing the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.14Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.15Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.16Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

93


Table of Contents
 4.17Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.18Form of 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.Material Contracts

 

 10.12007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.2Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.3Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.4Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.5Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.6Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.7Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

94


Table of Contents
 10.8Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated December 13, 2005, by and among Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent, relating to a $300,000,000 loan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.9First Amendment to Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated February 20, 2007, by and among Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent, relating to a $300,000,000 loan (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 12.Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).

 

 21.Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).

 

 23.Consent of Independent Accountants

 

 23.1Ernst & Young LLP dated February 26, 2009 (filed herewith).

 

 24.Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

 

 31.Section 302 Certifications

 

 31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 32.Section 906 Certifications

 

 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 99.Additional Exhibits

 

 99.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).

 

95


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 26th day of February, 2009.

 

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

By:

   /s/ Craig Macnab
   Craig Macnab
 

  Chairman of the Board and

  Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints each of Craig Macnab and Kevin B. Habicht as his attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this report and to file same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, granting unto such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

/s/ Craig Macnab

Craig Macnab

  

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

 February 26, 2009

/s/ Ted B. Lanier

Ted B. Lanier

  Lead Director February 26, 2009

/s/ Don DeFosset

Don DeFosset

  Director February 26, 2009

/s/ Dennis E. Gershenson

Dennis E. Gershenson

  Director February 26, 2009

/s/ Richard B. Jennings

Richard B. Jennings

  Director February 26, 2009

/s/ Robert C. Legler

Robert C. Legler

  Director February 26, 2009

/s/ Robert Martinez

Robert Martinez

  Director February 26, 2009

/s/ Kevin B. Habicht

Kevin B. Habicht

  

Director, Chief Financial

Officer (Principal Financial

and Accounting Officer),

Executive Vice President,

Assistant Secretary and

Treasurer

 February 26, 2009

 

96


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

 

 3.Articles of Incorporation and By-laws

 

 3.1First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 3.2Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 11, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 3.3Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

 

 4.1Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.2Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.3Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated September 20, 2000, by and among Registrant and First Union National Bank, Trustee, relating to $20,000,000 of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.4Form of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.5Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of May 30, 2002, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $50,000,000 of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

97


Table of Contents
 4.6Form of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.7Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated as of June 18, 2004, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.8Form of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.9Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.10Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.11Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2006, between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.12Form of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.13Specimen certificate representing the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.14Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

98


Table of Contents
 4.15Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.16Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.17Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.18Form of 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.Material Contracts

 

 10.12007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.2Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.3Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.4Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.5Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

99


Table of Contents
 10.6Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.7Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.8Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated December 13, 2005, by and among Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent, relating to a $300,000,000 loan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.9First Amendment to Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated February 20, 2007, by and among Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent, relating to a $300,000,000 loan (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 12.Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).

 

 21.Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).

 

 23.Consent of Independent Accountants

 

 23.1Ernst & Young LLP dated February 26, 2009 (filed herewith).

 

 24.Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

 

 31.Section 302 Certifications

 

 31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

100


Table of Contents
 32.Section 906 Certifications

 

 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 99.Additional Exhibits

 

 99.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).

 

101


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE III—REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION December 31, 2008

 

  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which Carried
at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Real Estate Held for
Investment the Company has Invested in Under
Operating Leases:

            

Academy:

            

Beaumont, TX

 —   1,423,701 2,449,261 —   —   1,423,701 2,449,261 3,872,962 599,559 1992  03/99  40 years 

Houston, TX

 —   2,310,845 1,627,872 —   —   2,310,845 1,627,872 3,938,717 398,489 1976  03/99  40 years 

Pasadena, TX

 —   899,768 2,180,574 —   —   899,768 2,180,574 3,080,342 533,786 1994  03/99  40 years 

Franklin, TN

 —   1,807,096 2,108,278 —   —   1,807,096 2,108,278 3,915,374 248,894 1999  06/05  30 years 

Ace Hardware and Lighting:

            

Bourbonnais, IL

 —   298,192 1,329,492 —   —   298,192 1,329,492 1,627,684 264,118 1997  11/98  37 years 

A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts Inc.

            

Dover, NJ

 —   1,138,296 3,238,083 —   —   1,138,296 3,238,083 4,376,379 819,640 1995  11/98  40 years 

Advanced Auto Parts:

            

Miami, FL

 —   867,177 —   1,035,275 —   867,177 1,035,275 1,902,452 91,665 2005  12/04(g) 40 years 

All Star Sports:

            

Wichita, KS

 —   3,275,372 1,630,685 —   —   3,275,372 1,630,685 4,906,057 66,247 1988  05/07  40 years 

Wichita, KS

 —   1,550,654 965,402 —   —   1,550,654 965,402 2,516,056 39,219 1987  05/07  40 years 

Amazing Jakes:

            

Aurora, CO

 —   5,075,945 13,873,887 —   —   5,075,945 13,873,887 18,949,832 592,531 1986  04/07  40 years 

Plano, TX

 —   5,705,067 17,049,425 —   —   5,705,067 17,049,425 22,754,492 223,266 1982  07/08  35 years 

American Payday Loans:

            

Des Moines, IA

 —   108,421 379,067 —   —   108,421 379,067 487,488 33,563 1979  06/05  40 years 

AmerUs Group Warehouse:

            

Des Moines, IA

 —   28,465 85,396 —   —   28,465 85,396 113,861 30,244 1949  06/05  10 years 

Amoco:

            

Miami, FL

 —   969,156 —   —   —   969,156 —   969,156 —   (i) 05/03  (i)

Sunrise, FL

 —   949,185 —   —   —   949,185 —   949,185 —   (i) 06/03  (i)

Amscot:

            

Tampa, FL

 —   1,159,733 352,305 —   —   1,159,733 352,305 1,512,038 28,258 1981  10/05  40 years 

Orlando, FL

 —   764,473 —   865,674 —   764,473 865,674 1,630,147 56,810 2006  12/05  40 years 

Orlando, FL

 —   664,213 1,010,821 —   —   664,213 1,010,821 1,675,034 55,806 2006  12/05  40 years 

Orlando, FL

 —   358,354 —   922,218 —   358,354 922,218 1,280,572 56,678 2006  02/06(g) 40 years 

Orlando, FL

 —   546,475 —   937,758 —   546,475 937,758 1,484,233 55,679 2006  02/06(g) 40 years 

Clearwater, FL

  455,524 331,614 —   —   455,524 331,614 787,138 18,999 1967  09/06(g) 40 years 

Applebee’s:

            

Ballwin, MO

 —   1,496,173 1,403,581 —   —   1,496,173 1,403,581 2,899,754 247,089 1995  12/01  40 years 

Arby’s:

            

Colorado Springs, CO

 —   205,957 533,540 —   —   205,957 533,540 739,497 93,925 1998  12/01  40 years 

Thomson, GA

 —   267,842 503,550 —   —   267,842 503,550 771,392 88,646 1997  12/01  40 years 

Washington Courthouse, OH

 —   156,875 545,841 —   —   156,875 545,841 702,716 96,091 1998  12/01  40 years 

Whitmore Lake, MI

 —   170,515 468,916 —   —   170,515 468,916 639,431 82,549 1993  12/01  40 years 

Arizona Oil:

            

Casa Grande, AZ

 —   2,339,580 1,893,868 —   —   2,339,580 1,893,868 4,233,448 33,819 1993  05/08  35 years 

Gilbert, AZ

 —   1,316,760 1,303,523 —   —   1,316,760 1,303,523 2,620,283 23,277 1996  05/08  35 years 

Glendale, AZ

 —   1,817,497 2,415,117 —   —   1,817,497 2,415,117 4,232,614 37,736 2001  05/08  40 years 

Mesa, AZ

 —   1,332,001 1,366,666 —   —   1,332,001 1,366,666 2,698,666 28,472 1986  05/08  30 years 

Mesa, AZ

 —   2,219,229 2,140,288 —   —   2,219,229 2,140,288 4,359,517 33,442 2000  05/08  40 years 

Miami, AZ

 —   762,158 2,147,619 —   —   762,158 2,147,619 2,909,778 38,350 1998  05/08  35 years 

Peoria, AZ

 —   860,443 1,116,682 —   —   860,443 1,116,682 1,977,125 23,264 1987  05/08  30 years 

Prescott, AZ

 —   1,266,424 1,260,903 —   —   1,266,424 1,260,903 2,527,328 22,516 1997  05/08  35 years 

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-1


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which Carried
at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Scottsdale, AZ

 —    1,529,446 1,372,600 —   —   1,529,446 1,372,600  2,902,046 24,511  1999 05/08  35 years 

Sedona, AZ

 —    1,281,305 1,324,080 —   —   1,281,305 1,324,080  2,605,385 20,689  2000 05/08  40 years 

Tucson, AZ

 —    1,104,811 1,335,836 —   —   1,104,811 1,335,836  2,440,647 23,854  1992 05/08  35 years 

Tucson, AZ

 —    1,082,884 1,598,982 —   —   1,082,884 1,598,982  2,681,866 28,553  1992 05/08  35 years 

Tucson, AZ

 —    1,457,039 1,618,943 —   —   1,457,039 1,618,943  3,075,982 28,910  1995 05/08  35 years 

Tucson, AZ

 —    1,223,258 1,911,165 —   —   1,223,258 1,911,165  3,134,423 34,128  1996 05/08  35 years 

Ashley Furniture:

            

Altamonte Springs, FL

 —    2,906,409 4,877,225 315,000 —   2,906,409 5,192,225  8,098,634 1,433,055  1997 09/97  40 years 

Louisville, KY

 —    1,666,700 4,989,452 —   —   1,666,700 4,989,452  6,656,152 472,958  2005 03/05  40 years 

Babies “R” Us:

            

Arlington, TX

 —    830,689 2,611,867 —   —   830,689 2,611,867  3,442,556 816,753  1996 06/96  40 years 

Independence, MO

 —    1,678,794 2,301,909 114,769 —   1,678,794 2,416,678  4,095,472 410,763  1996 12/01  40 years 

Barnes & Noble:

            

Brandon, FL

 —    1,476,407 1,527,150 —   —   1,476,407 1,527,150  3,003,557 533,665  1995 08/94(f) 40 years 

Denver, CO

 —    3,244,785 2,722,087 —   —   3,244,785 2,722,087  5,966,872 969,855  1994 09/94  40 years 

Houston, TX

 —    3,307,562 2,396,024 —   —   3,307,562 2,396,024  5,703,586 793,691  1995 10/94(f) 40 years 

Plantation, FL

 4,751,211(p) 3,616,357 —   —   —   3,616,457 (c) 3,616,457 (c) 1996 05/95(f) (c)

Freehold, NJ (r)

 —    2,917,219 2,260,663 —   —   2,917,219 2,260,663  5,177,882 730,320  1995 01/96  40 years 

Dayton, OH

 —    1,412,614 3,324,525 —   —   1,412,614 3,324,525  4,737,139 941,632  1996 05/97  40 years 

Redding, CA

 —    497,179 1,625,702 —   —   497,179 1,625,702  2,122,881 469,083  1997 06/97  40 years 

Memphis, TN

 —    1,573,875 2,241,639 —   —   1,573,875 2,241,639  3,815,514 275,535  1997 09/97  40 years 

Marlton, NJ

 —    2,831,370 4,318,554 —   —   2,709,055 4,318,554  7,027,609 1,093,134  1995 11/98  40 years 

Bassett Furniture:

            

Fairview Heights, IL

 —    1,257,729 2,622,952 —   —   1,257,729 2,622,952  3,880,681 210,383  1980 10/05  40 years 

Beall’s:

            

Sarasota, FL

 —    1,077,802 1,795,174 —   —   1,077,802 1,795,174  2,872,976 230,990  1996 09/97  40 years 

Beautiful America Dry Cleaners:

            

Orlando, FL

 58,124(o) 40,200 110,531 —   —   40,200 110,531  150,731 13,471  2001 02/04  40 years 

Bed, Bath & Beyond:

            

Richmond, VA

 2,723,255(p) 1,184,144 2,842,759 —   —   1,184,144 2,842,759  4,026,903 467,871  1997 06/98  40 years 

Glendale, AZ

 —    1,082,092 —   2,758,452 —   1,082,092 2,758,452  3,840,544 652,259  1999 12/98(g) 40 years 

Midland, MI

 —    231,356 —   2,702,271 —   231,356 2,702,271  2,933,627 143,986  2006 07/03  40 years 

Beneficial:

            

Eden Prairie, MN

 —    75,736 210,628 94,277 —   75,736 304,905  380,641 50,298  1997 12/01  40 years 

Best Buy:

            

Brandon, FL

 —    2,985,156 2,772,137 —   —   2,985,156 2,772,137  5,757,293 822,978  1996 02/97  40 years 

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

 —    3,708,980 2,359,377 —   —   3,708,980 2,359,377  6,068,357 680,779  1970 06/97  40 years 

Rockville, MD

 —    6,233,342 3,418,783 —   —   6,233,342 3,418,783  9,652,125 979,339  1995 07/97  40 years 

Fairfax, VA

 —    3,052,477 3,218,018 —   —   3,052,477 3,218,018  6,270,495 915,124  1995 08/97  40 years 

St. Petersburg, FL

 4,345,620(p) 4,031,744 2,610,980 —   —   4,031,744 2,610,980  6,642,724 491,113  1997 09/97  35 years 

Pittsburgh, PA

 —    2,330,847 2,292,932 —   —   2,330,847 2,292,932  4,623,779 604,283  1997 06/98  40 years 

Denver, CO

 —    8,881,890 4,372,684 —   —   8,881,890 4,372,684  13,254,574 824,433  1991 06/01  40 years 

Best Smoke & Gas:

            

Abbottstown, PA

 —    55,181 200,050 —   —   55,181 200,050  255,231 14,795  2000 01/06  40 years 

Billy Bob’s:

            

Gresham, OR

 —    817,311 108,294 —   —   817,311 108,294  925,605 19,064  1993 12/01  40 years 

BJ’s Wholesale Club:

            

Orlando, FL

 4,692,576(o) 3,270,851 8,626,657 366,650 —   3,270,851 8,993,307  12,264,158 1,069,953  2001 02/04  40 years 

Blockbuster Video:

            

Conyers, GA

 —    320,029 556,282 —   —   320,029 556,282  876,311 160,511  1997 06/97  40 years 

Alice, TX

 —    318,285 578,268 —   —   318,285 578,268  896,553 101,799  1995 12/01  40 years 

Gainesville, GA

 —    294,882 611,570 —   —   294,882 611,570  906,452 107,662  1997 12/01  40 years 

Glasgow, KY

 —    302,859 560,904 —   —   302,859 560,904  863,763 98,742  1997 12/01  40 years 

Kingsville, TX

 —    498,849 457,695 29,555 —   498,849 487,250  986,099 81,688  1995 12/01  40 years 

Mobile, AL

 —    491,453 498,488 —   —   491,453 498,488  989,941 87,755  1997 12/01  40 years 

Mobile, AL

 —    843,121 562,498 —   —   843,121 562,498  1,405,619 99,023  1997 12/01  40 years 

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-2


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which Carried
at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Con-
struction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

BMW:

            

Duluth, GA

 —    4,433,613 4,080,186 6,355,663 —   4,504,324 10,435,849  14,940,173 905,663  1984  12/01  40 years 

Borders Books & Music:

            

Wilmington, DE

 —    3,030,764 6,061,538 —   —   2,994,395 6,061,538  9,055,933 2,125,612  1994  12/94  40 years 

Richmond, VA

 —    2,177,310 2,599,587 —   —   2,177,310 2,599,587  4,776,897 881,332  1995  06/95  40 years 

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

 4,577,387(p) 3,164,984 3,319,234 —   —   3,164,984 3,319,234  6,484,218 662,170  1995  02/96  33 years 

Bangor, ME

 —    1,546,915 2,486,761 —   —   1,546,915 2,486,761  4,033,676 778,840  1996  06/96  40 years 

Altamonte Springs, FL

 —    1,947,198 —   —   —   1,947,198 (c) 1,947,198 (c) 1997  09/97  (c)

Borough of Abbotstown:

            

Abbottstown, PA

 —    55,181 200,050 —   —   55,181 200,050  255,231 14,795  2000  01/06  40 years 

Boston Market:

            

Burton, MI

 —    619,778 707,242 —   —   619,778 707,242  1,327,020 124,504  1997  12/01  40 years 

Geneva, IL

 —    1,125,347 1,036,952 —   —   1,125,347 893,485  2,018,832 159,397  1996  12/01  40 years 

North Olmsted, OH

 —    601,800 460,521 —   —   601,800 389,065  990,865 69,541  1996  12/01  40 years 

Novi, MI

 —    835,669 651,108 —   —   835,669 297,567  1,133,236 57,575  1995  12/01  40 years 

Orland Park, IL

 —    562,384 556,201 —   —   562,384 377,244  939,628 69,038  1995  12/01  40 years 

Warren, OH

 —    562,446 467,592 —   —   562,446 467,592  1,030,038 82,316  1997  12/01  40 years 

Buck’s:

            

St. Louis, MO

 —    775,246 —   —   —   775,246 —    775,246 (e) (e) 12/07(q) (e)

Buffalo Wild Wings:

            

Michigan City, IN

 —    162,538 492,007 —   —   162,538 492,007  654,545 86,614  1996  12/01  40 years 

Bugaboo Creek:

            

Lithonia, GA

 —    922,578 1,276,222 —   —   922,578 1,276,222  2,198,800 49,188  2002  06/07  40 years 

Rochester, NY

 —    792,275 1,535,158 —   —   792,275 1,535,158  2,327,433 59,168  1995  06/07  40 years 

Burger King:

            

Colonial Heights, VA

 —    662,345 609,787 —   —   662,345 609,787  1,272,132 107,348  1997  12/01  40 years 

Carino’s:

            

Beaumont, TX

 —    439,076 1,363,447 —   —   439,076 1,363,447  1,802,523 240,023  2000  12/01  40 years 

Lewisville, TX

 —    1,369,836 1,018,659 —   —   1,369,836 1,018,659  2,388,495 179,326  1994  12/01  40 years 

Lubbock, TX

 —    1,007,432 1,205,512 —   —   1,007,432 1,205,512  2,212,944 212,220  1995  12/01  40 years 

Carl’s Jr:

            

Chandler, AZ

 —    729,291 644,148 —   —   729,291 644,148  1,373,439 114,068  1984  06/05  20 years 

Tucson, AZ

 —    681,386 536,023 103,000 —   681,386 639,023  1,320,409 211,079  1988  06/05  10 years 

Spokane, WA

 —    470,840 530,289 —   —   470,840 530,289  1,001,129 93,353  1996  12/01  40 years 

Carver’s:

            

Centerville, OH

 —    850,625 1,059,430 —   —   850,625 1,059,430  1,910,055 186,504  1986  12/01  40 years 

Cash Advance:

            

Mesa, AZ

 —    43,043 112,764 250,696 —   43,043 363,460  406,503 33,088  1997  12/01  40 years 

Certified Auto Sales:

            

Albuquerque, NM

 —    1,112,876 —   1,418,552 —   1,112,876 1,418,552  2,531,428 122,646  2005  04/04(f) 40 years 

Champps:

            

Alpharetta, GA

 —    3,032,965 1,641,820 —   —   3,032,965 1,641,820  4,674,785 289,029  1999  12/01  40 years 

Irving, TX

 —    1,760,020 1,724,220 —   —   1,760,020 1,724,220  3,484,240 303,534  2000  12/01  40 years 

Charhut:

            

Sunrise, FL

 —    286,834 423,837 —   —   286,834 423,837  710,671 48,876  1979  05/04  40 years 

Checkers:

            

Oralndo, FL

 —    256,568 —   —   —   256,568 (c) 256,568 (c) 1979  05/04  (c)

Chili’s:

            

Camden, SC

 —    626,897 1,887,732 —   —   626,897 1,887,732  2,514,629 155,345  2005  09/05  40 years 

Milledgeville, GA

 —    516,118 1,996,627 —   —   516,118 1,996,627  2,512,745 164,306  2005  09/05  40 years 

Sumter, SC

 —    800,329 1,717,221 —   —   800,329 1,717,221  2,517,550 130,580  2004  12/05  40 years 

Hinesville, GA

 —    920,971 1,898,416 —   —   920,971 1,898,416  2,819,387 88,988  2006  02/07  40 years 

Albany, GA

 —    615,086 —   1,983,955 —   615,086 1,983,955  2,599,041 59,932  2007  06/07(q) 40 years 

Statesboro, GA

 —    703,199 —   1,887,811 —   703,199 1,887,811  2,591,010 53,095  2007  06/07(q) 40 years 

Florence, SC

 —    888,837 1,715,454 —   —   888,837 1,715,454  2,604,291 66,116  2007  06/07  40 years 

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-3


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Con-
struction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Valdosta, GA

 —    716,196 —   1,870,720 —   716,196 1,870,720  2,586,916 48,717  2007  07/07(q) 40 years 

Tifton, GA

 —    453,624 —   —   —   453,624 —    453,624 (e) (e) 06/08(q) (e)

Evans, GA

 —    700,000 —   —   —   700,000 —    700,000 (e) (e) 10/08(q) (e)

China Wok:

            

Carlisle, PA

 —    90,443 106,987 —   —   90,443 106,987  197,430 7,351  2007  07/07  40 years 

Circuit City:

            

Gastonia, NC

 —    2,548,040 3,879,911 —   —   2,548,040 3,879,911  6,427,951 392,033  2004  12/04  40 years 

St. Peters, MO

 —    1,740,807 5,406,298 —   —   1,740,807 5,406,298  7,147,105 467,419  2005  06/05(g) 40 years 

Claim Jumper:

            

Roseville, CA

 —    1,556,732 2,013,650 —   —   1,556,732 2,013,650  3,570,382 354,486  2000  12/01  40 years 

Tempe, AZ

 —    2,530,892 2,920,575 —   —   2,530,892 2,920,575  5,451,467 514,143  2000  12/01  40 years 

Cool Crest:

            

Independence, MO

 —    1,837,672 1,533,729 —   —   1,837,672 1,533,729  3,371,401 62,308  1988  05/07  40 years 

CORA Rehabilitation Clinics:

            

Orlando, FL

 116,248(o) 80,400 221,063 —   —   80,400 221,063  301,463 26,942  2001  02/04  40 years 

Corpus Christi Flea Market:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

 —    223,998 2,158,955 —   —   223,998 2,158,955  2,382,953 528,494  1983  03/99  40 years 

CVS:

            

San Antonio, TX

 —    440,985 —   —   —   440,985 (c) 440,985 (c) 1993  12/93  (c)

Lafayette, LA

 —    967,528 —   —   —   967,528 (c) 967,528 (c) 1995  01/96  (c)

Midwest City, OK

 —    673,369 1,103,351 —   —   673,369 1,103,351  1,776,720 353,769  1996  03/96  40 years 

Pantego, TX

 —    1,016,062 1,448,911 —   —   1,016,062 1,448,911  2,464,973 418,071  1997  06/97  40 years 

Flower Mound, TX

 —    932,233 881,448 —   —   932,233 881,448  1,813,681 108,345  1996  09/97  40 years 

Arlington, TX

 —    2,078,542 —   1,396,508 —   2,078,542 1,396,508  3,475,050 362,219  1998  11/97(g) 40 years 

Leavenworth, KS

 —    726,438 —   1,330,830 —   726,438 1,330,830  2,057,268 350,729  1998  11/97(g) 40 years 

Lewisville, TX

 —    789,237 —   1,335,426 —   789,237 1,335,426  2,124,663 343,594  1998  04/98(g) 40 years 

Forest Hill, TX

 —    692,165 —   1,174,549 —   692,165 1,174,549  1,866,714 304,649  1998  04/98(g) 40 years 

Garland, TX

 —    1,476,838 —   1,400,278 —   1,476,838 1,400,278  2,877,116 354,446  1998  06/98(g) 40 years 

Oklahoma City, OK

 —    1,581,480 —   1,471,105 —   1,581,480 1,471,105  3,052,585 366,244  1999  08/98(g) 40 years 

Dallas, TX

 —    2,617,656 —   2,570,569 —   2,617,656 2,570,569  5,188,225 334,709  2003  06/99  40 years 

Gladstone, MO

 49,403  1,851,374 —   1,739,568 —   1,851,374 1,739,568  3,590,942 364,222  2000  12/99(g) 40 years 

Dave & Buster’s:

            

Hilliard, OH

 —    934,210 4,689,004 —   —   934,210 4,689,004  5,623,214 249,103  1998  11/06  40 years 

Tulsa, OK

 —    1,861,630 —   —   —   1,861,630 —    1,861,630 (e) (e) 04/08  (e)

Wawatosa, WI

 —    5,693,911 —   —   —   5,693,911 —    5,693,911 (e) (e) 12/08  (e)

Denny’s:

            

Columbus, TX

 —    428,429 816,644 —   —   428,429 816,644  1,245,073 143,763  1997  12/01  40 years 

Alexandria, VA

 —    603,730 195,658 —   —   603,730 195,658  799,388 22,419  1981  09/06  20 years 

Amarillo, TX

 —    589,996 632,121 —   —   589,996 632,121  1,222,117 72,431  1982  09/06  20 years 

Arlington Heights, IL

 —    469,593 227,673 —   —   469,593 227,673  697,266 26,088  1977  09/06  20 years 

Austintown, OH

 —    466,124 397,387 —   —   466,124 397,387  863,511 45,534  1980  09/06  20 years 

Boardman Township, OH

 —    497,083 257,518 —   —   497,083 257,518  754,601 29,507  1977  09/06  20 years 

Campbell, CA

 —    459,751 238,205 —   —   459,751 238,205  697,956 27,294  1976  09/06  20 years 

Carson, CA

 —    1,245,768 157,375 —   —   1,245,768 157,375  1,403,143 18,033  1975  09/06  20 years 

Chelais, WA

 —    414,994 287,174 —   —   414,994 287,174  702,168 32,905  1977  09/06  20 years 

Chubbock, ID

 —    350,461 394,243 —   —   350,461 394,243  744,704 45,174  1983  09/06  20 years 

Clackamus, OR

 —    468,281 407,268 —   —   468,281 407,268  875,549 46,666  1993  09/06  20 years 

Collinsville, IL

 —    675,704 282,912 —   —   675,704 282,912  958,616 32,417  1979  09/06  20 years 

Colorado Springs, CO

 —    321,006 376,744 —   —   321,006 376,744  697,750 43,169  1984  09/06  20 years 

Colorado Springs, CO

 —    585,425 390,275 —   —   585,425 390,275  975,700 44,719  1978  09/06  20 years 

Corpus Christi, TX

 —    344,821 775,618 —   —   344,821 775,618  1,120,439 88,873  1980  09/06  20 years 

Dallas, TX

 —    497,170 149,862 —   —   497,170 149,862  647,032 17,172  1979  09/06  20 years 

Enfield, CT

 —    684,235 228,981 —   —   684,235 228,981  913,216 26,237  1976  09/06  20 years 

Fairfax, VA

 —    768,438 682,921 —   —   768,438 682,921  1,451,359 78,251  1979  09/06  20 years 

Federal Way, WA

 —    542,951 192,650 —   —   542,951 192,650  735,601 22,075  1977  09/06  20 years 

Florissant, MO

 —    442,700 237,959 —   —   442,700 237,959  680,659 27,266  1977  09/06  20 years 

Ft. Worth, TX

 —    392,306 314,262 —   —   392,306 314,262  706,568 36,009  1974  09/06  20 years 

Hermitage, PA

 —    320,918 419,980 —   —   320,918 419,980  740,898 48,123  1980  09/06  20 years 

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-4


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Hialeah, FL

 —   432,479 175,245 —   —   432,479 175,245 607,724 20,080 1978 09/06  20 years

Houston, TX

 —   503,797 347,749 —   —   503,797 347,749 851,546 39,846 1976 09/06  20 years

Indianapolis, IN

 —   325,937 511,345 —   —   325,937 511,345 837,282 58,592 1978 09/06  20 years

Indianapolis, IN

 —   310,383 589,689 —   —   310,383 589,689 900,072 67,569 1981 09/06  20 years

Indianapolis, IN

 —   358,295 766,627 —   —   358,295 766,627 1,124,922 87,843 1978 09/06  20 years

Indianapolis, IN

 —   222,629 482,909 —   —   222,629 482,909 705,538 55,333 1979 09/06  20 years

Indianapolis, IN

 —   231,236 511,175 —   —   231,236 511,175 742,411 58,572 1974 09/06  20 years

Kernersville, NC

 —   406,544 557,465 —   —   406,544 557,465 964,009 63,876 2000 09/06  20 years

Lafayette, IN

 —   423,516 773,096 —   —   416,445 773,096 1,189,541 88,584 1978 09/06  20 years

Laurel, MD

 —   527,596 379,327 —   —   527,596 379,327 906,923 43,465 1976 09/06  20 years

Little Rock, AR

 —   671,665 76,507 —   —   671,665 76,507 748,172 8,766 1979 09/06  20 years

Little Rock, AR

 —   702,789 179,699 —   —   702,789 179,699 882,488 20,591 1979 09/06  20 years

Maplewood, MN

 —   630,007 271,268 —   —   630,007 271,268 901,275 31,083 1983 09/06  20 years

Merrivile, IN

 —   368,152 813,167 —   —   368,152 813,167 1,181,319 93,175 1976 09/06  20 years

Middleburg Heights, OH

 —   496,963 259,581 —   —   496,963 259,581 756,544 29,744 1976 09/06  20 years

N. Miami, FL

 —   855,381 151,216 —   —   855,381 151,216 1,006,597 17,327 1977 09/06  20 years

Nampa, ID

 —   356,591 729,175 —   —   356,591 729,175 1,085,766 83,551 1979 09/06  20 years

North Richland Hills, TX

 —   500,352 129,840 —   —   500,352 129,840 630,192 14,878 1970 09/06  20 years

Novi, MI

 —   545,175 305,344 —   —   545,175 305,344 850,519 34,987 1979 09/06  20 years

Omaha, NE

 —   496,452 314,303 —   —   496,452 314,303 810,755 36,014 1994 09/06  20 years

Pompano Beach, FL

 —   436,153 393,590 —   —   436,153 393,590 829,743 45,099 1976 09/06  20 years

Portland, OR

 —   764,431 161,462 —   —   764,431 161,462 925,893 18,501 1977 09/06  20 years

Provo, UT

 —   519,038 216,015 —   —   519,038 216,015 735,053 24,752 1978 09/06  20 years

Pueblo, CO

 —   475,420 301,725 —   —   475,420 301,725 777,145 34,573 1980 09/06  20 years

Raleigh, NC

 —   1,094,361 482,297 —   —   1,094,361 482,297 1,576,658 55,263 1984 09/06  20 years

Southfield, MI

 —   401,401 330,496 —   —   401,401 330,496 731,897 37,869 1980 09/06  20 years

St. Louis, MO

 —   519,641 265,824 —   —   519,641 265,824 785,465 30,459 1973 09/06  20 years

Sugarland, TX

 —   315,186 334,027 —   —   315,186 334,027 649,213 38,274 1997 09/06  20 years

Tacoma, WA

 —   580,288 200,559 —   —   580,288 200,559 780,847 22,981 1984 09/06  20 years

Tuscon, AZ

 —   922,401 290,221 —   —   922,401 290,221 1,212,622 33,255 1979 09/06  20 years

W. Palm Beach, FL

 —   619,003 160,924 —   —   619,003 160,924 779,927 18,439 1984 09/06  20 years

Weathersfield, CT

 —   883,538 176,136 —   —   883,538 176,136 1,059,674 20,182 1978 09/06  20 years

Worcester, MA

 —   383,194 492,602 —   —   383,194 492,602 875,796 56,444 1978 09/06  20 years

Boise, ID

 —   514,340 476,967 —   —   514,340 476,967 991,307 48,690 1983 12/06  20 years

St. Louis, MO

 —   634,924 302,979 —   —   634,924 302,979 937,903 29,667 1980 01/07  20 years

Virginia Gardens, FL

 —   793,432 132,605 —   —   793,432 132,605 926,037 12,984 1977 01/07  20 years

Dick’s Sporting Goods:

            

Taylor, MI

 —   1,920,032 3,526,868 —   —   1,920,032 3,526,868 5,446,900 1,084,133 1996 08/96  40 years

White Marsh, MD

 —   2,680,532 3,916,889 —   —   2,680,532 3,916,889 6,597,421 1,204,022 1996 08/96  40 years

Dollar Tree:

            

Garland, TX

 —   239,014 626,170 —   —   239,014 626,170 865,183 117,407 1994 02/94  40 years

Copperas Cove, TX

 —   241,650 511,624 194,167 —   241,650 705,791 947,441 163,282 1972 11/98  40 years

Donato’s:

            

Medina, OH

 —   405,113 463,582 —   —   405,113 463,582 868,696 81,610 1996 12/01  40 years

Dr. Clean Dry Cleaners:

            

Monticello, NY

 —   19,625 71,570 —   —   19,625 71,570 91,195 6,784 1996 03/05  40 years

Easyhome:

            

Cohoes, NY

 —   59,110 318,610 222,454 —   59,110 541,064 600,174 37,285 1994 09/04  40 years

El Paso Barbeque:

            

Tuscon, AZ

 —   996,435 —   2,741,660 —   996,435 2,741,660 3,738,095 88,533 2007 12/06(q) 40 years

Farmington, NM

 —   2,756,524 —   729,748 —   2,756,524 729,748 3,486,272 11,402 2003 12/07(q) 40 years

El Tapatio Grill:

            

Hammond, LA

 —   247,600 813,514 61,688 —   247,600 627,002 874,602 125,187 1997 12/01  40 years

Enterprise Rent-A-Car:

            

Wilmington, NC

 —   218,126 327,329 33,169 —   218,126 360,498 578,624 58,280 1981 12/01  40 years

Express Oil Change:

            

Muscle Shoals, AL

 —   167,949 624,273 —   —   167,949 624,273 792,222 18,208 1985 02/08  40 years

Florence, AL

 —   110,188 381,082 —   —   110,188 381,082 491,270 11,115 1987 02/08  40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-5


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Helena, AL

 —   363,087 628,027 —   —   363,087 628,027  991,114 13,738  1998 02/08  40 years 

Opelika, AL

 —   547,215 679,735 —   —   547,215 679,735  1,226,950 14,869  2006 02/08  40 years 

Birmingham, AL

 —   469,534 695,487 —   —   469,534 695,487  1,165,021 13,765  2008 02/08(f) 40 years 

Cordova, TN

 —   638,628 785,040 —   —   638,628 785,040  1,423,668 818  2000 12/08  40 years 

Horn Lake, MS

 —   326,116 611,004 —   —   326,116 611,004  937,120 727  1998 12/08  40 years 

Lakeland, TN

 —   185,823 488,569 —   —   185,823 488,569  674,392 509  2000 12/08  40 years 

Memphis, TN

 —   402,438 721,361 —   —   402,438 721,361  1,123,799 751  1998 12/08  40 years 

Fallas Paredes:

            

Arlington, TX

 —   317,838 1,680,428 242,483 —   317,838 1,922,911  2,240,749 516,949  1996 06/96  38 years 

Family Dollar:

            

Cohoes, NY

 —   94,038 506,879 4,923 —   94,038 511,802  605,840 54,413  1994 09/04  40 years 

Hudson Falls, NY

 —   51,055 379,789 —   —   51,055 379,789  430,844 40,748  1993 09/04  40 years 

Monticello, NY

 —   96,445 351,721 —   —   96,445 351,721  448,166 33,340  1996 03/05  40 years 

Famous Footwear:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —   163,152 834,548 —   —   163,152 834,548  997,700 26,949  2007 09/07  40 years 

Fantastic Sams:

            

Eden Prairie, MN

 —   64,916 180,538 80,809 —   64,916 261,347  326,263 43,113  1997 12/01  40 years 

Fazoli’s Restaurant:

            

Bay City, MI

 —   647,055 633,899 —   —   647,055 633,899  1,280,953 111,593  1997 12/01  40 years 

Ferguson:

            

Destin, FL

 —   553,552 1,011,898 253,411 —   553,552 1,265,309  1,818,861 48,228  2006 03/07  40 years 

Food Fast:

            

Bossier City, LA

 —   882,882 657,929 —   —   882,882 657,929  1,540,811 67,620  1975 06/07  15 years 

Brownsboro, TX

 —   327,611 385,088 —   —   327,611 385,088  712,699 19,789  1990 06/07  30 years 

Flint, TX

 —   272,007 410,803 —   —   272,007 410,803  682,810 25,333  1985 06/07  25 years 

Forney, TX

 —   545,133 707,160 —   —   545,133 707,160  1,252,293 36,340  1989 06/07  30 years 

Forney, TX

 —   473,290 653,516 —   —   473,290 653,516  1,126,806 33,583  1990 06/07  30 years 

Gun Barrel City, TX

 —   241,890 467,271 —   —   241,890 467,271  709,161 28,815  1988 06/07  25 years 

Gun Barrel City, TX

 —   269,871 386,429 —   —   269,871 386,429  656,300 23,830  1986 06/07  25 years 

Jacksonville, TX

 —   660,275 632,166 —   —   660,275 632,166  1,292,441 64,973  1976 06/07  15 years 

Kemp, TX

 —   580,596 505,102 —   —   580,596 505,102  1,085,698 31,148  1986 06/07  25 years 

Longview, TX

 —   252,373 303,925 —   —   252,373 303,925  556,298 18,742  1983 06/07  25 years 

Longview, TX

 —   271,236 430,518 —   —   271,236 430,518  701,754 22,124  1990 06/07  30 years 

Longview, TX

 —   425,860 381,585 —   —   425,860 381,585  807,445 23,531  1984 06/07  25 years 

Longview, TX

 —   359,539 535,304 —   —   359,539 535,304  894,843 33,010  1983 06/07  25 years 

Longview, TX

 —   403,420 571,962 —   —   403,420 571,962  975,382 35,271  1985 06/07  25 years 

Longview, TX

 —   178,176 235,972 —   —   178,176 235,972  414,148 18,190  1977 06/07  20 years 

Mabank, TX

 —   229,097 493,568 —   —   229,097 493,568  722,665 30,437  1986 06/07  25 years 

Mt. Vernon, TX

 —   292,251 666,046 —   —   292,251 666,046  958,297 41,073  1990 06/07  25 years 

Shreveport, LA

 —   360,801 249,918 —   —   360,801 249,918  610,719 25,686  1969 06/07  15 years 

Tyler, TX

 —   323,146 283,153 —   —   323,146 283,153  606,299 21,826  1978 06/07  20 years 

Tyler, TX

 —   487,716 831,325 —   —   487,716 831,325  1,319,041 64,081  1980 06/07  20 years 

Tyler, TX

 —   742,070 545,967 —   —   742,070 545,967  1,288,037 33,668  1985 06/07  25 years 

Tyler, TX

 —   256,415 542,486 - - 256,415 542,486  798,901 41,817  1980 06/07  20 years 

Tyler, TX

 —   188,162 328,622 —   —   188,162 328,622  516,784 20,265  1984 06/07  25 years 

Tyler, TX

 —   542,144 403,494 —   —   480,697 403,494  884,191 24,882  1984 06/07  25 years 

Tyler, TX

 —   257,981 418,816 —   —   257,981 418,816  676,797 32,284  1978 06/07  20 years 

Tyler, TX

 —   316,208 544,790 —   —   316,208 544,790  860,998 27,996  1989 06/07  30 years 

Tyler, TX

 —   301,853 455,181 —   —   301,853 455,181  757,034 35,087  1981 06/07  20 years 

Food 4 Less:

            

Chula Vista, CA

 —   3,568,862 —   —   —   3,568,862 (c) 3,568,862 (c) 1995 11/98  (c)

Fresh Market:

            

Gainesville, FL

 —   317,386 1,248,404 655,827 —   317,386 1,904,231  2,221,617 191,928  1982 03/99  40 years 

Fuel On:

            

Bloomsburg, PA

 —   540,561 146,127 —   —   540,561 146,127  686,688 24,659  1988 01/06  40 years 

Carlisle, PA

 —   170,450 201,630 —   —   170,450 201,630  372,080 15,687  1988 01/06  40 years 

Emporium, PA

 —   380,032 568,625 —   —   380,032 568,625  948,657 95,955  1996 08/05  40 years 

Luzerne, PA

 —   170,866 415,294 —   —   170,866 415,294  586,160 70,081  1989 08/05  40 years 

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-6


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Con-
struction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land  Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land  Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

St. Mary’s, PA

 —   274,323  260,942 —   —   274,323  260,942 535,265 44,034  1979  08/05  40 years 

Zelienople, PA

 —   160,219  437,167 —   —   160,219  437,167 597,386 32,332  1988  01/06  40 years 

Furniture Xpress:

            

Buford, GA

 —   1,925,129  5,034,846 —   —   1,925,129  5,034,846 6,959,975 561,175  2004  07/04  40 years 

Furr’s Family Dining:

            

Las Cruces, NM

 —   947,476  —   2,181,954 —   947,476  2,181,954 3,129,430 125,008  2006  01/06(q) 40 years 

Tuscon, AZ

 —   1,170,722  —   —   —   1,170,722  —   1,170,722 (e) (e) 07/06(q) (e)

Moore, OK

 —   938,701  —   2,429,401 —   938,701  2,429,401 3,368,102 73,388  2007  03/07(q) 40 years 

Gander Mountain:

            

Amarillo, TX

 —   1,513,714  5,781,294 —   —   1,513,714  5,781,294 7,295,008 596,196  2004  11/04  40 years 

Gate Petroleum:

            

Concord, NC

 —   852,225  1,200,862 —   —   852,225  1,200,862 2,053,087 106,326  2001  06/05  40 years 

Rocky Mountain, NC

 —   258,764  1,164,438 —   —   258,764  1,164,438 1,423,202 103,101  2000  06/05  40 years 

Gen-X Clothing:

            

Federal Way, WA

 —   2,037,392  1,661,577 257,414 —   2,037,392  1,918,991 3,956,383 471,412  1998  06/98  40 years 

Golden Corral:

            

Abbeville, LA

 —   98,577  362,416 —   —   98,577  362,416 460,993 251,103  1985  04/85  35 years 

Lake Placid, FL

 —   115,113  305,074 43,797 —   115,113  348,871 463,984 222,973  1985  05/85  35 years 

Tampa, FL

 —   1,329,793  1,390,502 —   —   1,329,793  1,390,502 2,720,296 244,786  1998  12/01  40 years 

Dallas, TX

 —   1,138,129  1,024,747 —   —   1,138,129  1,024,747 2,162,875 180,398  1994  12/01  40 years 

Temple Terrace, FL

 —   1,187,614  1,339,000 —   —   1,187,614  1,339,000 2,526,614 235,720  1997  12/01  40 years 

Goodyear Truck & Tire:

            

Wichita, KS

 —   213,640  686,700 —   —   213,640  686,700 900,340 121,603  1989  06/05  20 years 

Anthony, TX

 —   (l) 1,241,517 —   —   (l) 1,241,517 1,241,517 45,264  2007  02/07  40 years 

Great Clips:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —   27,379  197,785 —   —   27,379  197,785 225,164 6,798  2007  10/07  40 years 

Guitar Center:

            

Roseville, MN

 —   1,599,311  1,419,396 —   —   1,599,311  1,419,396 3,018,707 107,933  1994  08/06  40 years 

GymKix:

            

Copperas Cove, TX

 —   203,908  431,715 171,477 —   203,908  603,192 807,100 139,136  1972  11/98  40 years 

H&R Block:

            

Swansea, IL

 —   45,842  132,440 69,029 —   45,842  201,469 247,311 34,378  1997  12/01  40 years 

Hastings:

            

Nacogdoches, TX

 —   397,074  1,257,402 —   —   397,074  1,257,402 1,654,477 318,280  1997  11/98  40 years 

Haverty’s:

            

Clearwater, FL

 —   1,184,938  2,526,207 44,005 —   1,230,572  2,570,212 3,800,784 995,449  1992  05/93  40 years 

Orlando, FL

 —   820,397  2,184,721 176,425 —   820,397  2,361,146 3,181,543 872,409  1992  05/93  40 years 

Pensacola, FL

 —   633,125  1,595,405 —   —   603,111  1,595,405 2,198,516 499,007  1994  06/96  40 years 

Bowie, MD

 —   1,965,508  4,221,074 —   —   1,965,508  4,221,074 6,186,582 1,036,995  1997  12/97  38 years 

Healthy Pet:

            

Suwannee, GA

 —   175,183  1,038,492 —   —   175,183  1,038,492 1,213,675 53,006  1997  12/06  40 years 

Colonial Heights, VA

 —   159,879  746,261 —   —   159,879  746,261 906,140 36,536  1996  01/07  40 years 

Heilig-Meyers:

            

Baltimore, MD

 —   469,781  813,073 —   —   469,781  813,073 1,282,854 205,809  1968  11/98  40 years 

Glen Burnie, MD

 —   631,712  931,931 —   —   631,712  931,931 1,563,643 235,848  1968  11/98  40 years 

Hollywood Video:

            

Cincinnati, OH

 —   282,200  520,623 279,308 —   543,438  538,693 1,082,132 92,254  1998  12/01  40 years 

Clifton, CO

 —   245,462  732,477 —   —   245,462  732,477 977,939 128,946  1998  12/01  40 years 

Lafayette, LA

 —   603,190  1,149,251 —   —   603,190  1,149,251 1,752,441 87,391  1999  12/05  40 years 

Home Décor:

            

Memphis, TN

 —   549,309  539,643 364,460 —   549,309  904,103 1,453,412 200,016  1998  11/98  40 years 

Home Depot:

            

Sunrise, FL

 —   5,148,657  —   —   —   5,148,657  —   5,148,657 —    (i) 05/03  (i)

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-7


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
  Date
Acquired
 Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

HomeGoods:

            

Fairfax, VA

 —    977,839 1,414,261 937,301 —   977,839 2,351,562 3,329,401 296,112 1995  12/95 40 years 

Hooters:

            

Tampa, FL

 —    783,923 504,768 —   —   783,923 504,768 1,288,692 88,860 1993  12/01 40 years 

Humana:

            

Sunrise, FL

 —    800,271 252,717 —   —   800,271 252,717 1,052,988 29,168 1984  05/04 40 years 

Hy-Vee:

            

St. Joseph, MO

 —    1,579,583 2,849,246 —   —   1,579,583 2,849,246 4,428,829 448,170 1991  09/02 40 years 

International House of Pancakes:

            

Midwest City, OK

 —    407,268 —   —   —   407,268 —   407,268  (i) 11/00 (i)

Ankeny, IA

 —    692,956 515,035 —   —   692,956 515,035 1,207,991 60,803 2002  06/05 30 years 

Jack-in-the-Box:

            

Plano, TX

 —    1,055,433 1,236,590 —   —   1,055,433 1,236,590 2,292,023 109,490 2001  06/05 40 years 

Jacobson Industrial:

            

Des Moines, IA

 —    60,517 112,390 —   —   60,517 112,390 172,907 19,902 1973  06/05 20 years 

Jared Jewelers:

            

Richmond, VA

 —    955,134 1,336,152 —   —   955,134 1,336,152 2,291,286 235,218 1998  12/01 40 years 

Brandon, FL

 —    1,196,900 1,182,150 —   —   1,196,900 1,182,150 2,379,050 195,995 2001  05/02 40 years 

Lithonia, GA

 —    1,270,517 1,215,818 —   —   1,270,517 1,215,818 2,486,335 201,576 2001  05/02 40 years 

Houston, TX

 —    1,675,739 1,439,597 —   —   1,675,739 1,439,597 3,115,336 217,439 1999  12/02 40 years 

Jo-Ann Etc:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

 —    818,448 896,395 12,222 —   818,448 908,617 1,727,065 343,049 1967  11/93 40 years 

Kangaroo Express:

            

Belleview, FL

 —    471,029 1,451,277 —   —   471,029 1,451,277 1,922,306 86,170 2006  08/06 40 years 

Carthage, NC

 —    485,461 353,643 —   —   485,461 353,643 839,104 20,998 1989  08/06 40 years 

Jacksonville, FL

 —    807,477 1,239,085 —   —   807,477 1,239,085 2,046,562 73,571 1975  08/06 40 years 

Jacksonville, FL

 —    684,639 1,361,897 —   —   682,510 1,361,897 2,044,407 80,863 1969  08/06 40 years 

Sanford, NC

 —    666,330 660,594 —   —   666,330 660,594 1,326,924 39,223 2000  08/06 40 years 

Sanford, NC

 —    1,638,444 1,370,558 —   —   1,638,444 1,370,558 3,009,002 81,377 2003  08/06 40 years 

Siler City, NC

 —    586,174 645,290 —   —   586,174 645,290 1,231,464 38,314 1998  08/06 40 years 

West End, NC

 —    426,114 516,010 —   —   426,114 516,010 942,124 30,638 1999  08/06 40 years 

Destin, FL

 —    1,365,569 1,192,192 —   —   1,365,569 1,192,192 2,557,761 68,303 2000  09/06 40 years 

Niceville, FL

 —    1,433,652 1,124,109 —   —   1,433,652 1,124,109 2,557,761 64,402 2000  09/06 40 years 

Interlachen, FL

 —    518,814 1,500,000 - - 518,814 1,500,000 2,018,814 29,688 2007  10/06 40 years 

Kill Devil Hills, NC

 —    679,169 552,393 —   —   679,169 552,393 1,231,562 30,501 1990  10/06 40 years 

Kill Devil Hills, NC

 —    490,309 741,222 —   —   490,309 741,222 1,231,531 40,927 1995  10/06 40 years 

Clarksville, TN

 —    521,023 709,784 —   —   521,023 709,784 1,230,807 36,229 1999  12/06 40 years 

Clarksville, TN

 —    275,897 954,910 —   —   275,897 954,910 1,230,807 48,740 1999  12/06 40 years 

Gallatin,TN

 —    474,297 756,510 —   —   474,297 756,510 1,230,807 38,320 1999  12/06 40 years 

Naples, FL

 —    3,194,938 1,403,297 —   —   3,194,938 1,403,297 4,598,235 71,627 2001  12/06 40 years 

Oxford, MS

 —    440,413 1,096,748 —   —   440,413 1,096,748 1,537,161 55,980 1998  12/06 40 years 

Columbiana, AL

 —    770,793 988,907 —   —   770,793 988,907 1,759,700 48,415 1982  01/07 40 years 

Naples, FL

 —    3,161,883 1,596,602 —   —   3,161,883 1,596,602 4,758,485 74,841 1995  02/07 40 years 

Kentwood, LA

 —    985,372 891,185 —   —   985,372 891,185 1,876,557 39,918 2001  03/07 40 years 

Longs, SC

 —    745,488 757,865 —   —   745,488 757,865 1,503,353 33,946 2001  03/07 40 years 

Naples, FL

 —    2,412,119 1,589,011 —   —   2,412,119 1,589,011 4,001,130 64,554 2000  05/07 40 years 

Montgomery, AL

 —    666,002 1,185,069 —   —   666,002 1,185,069 1,851,071 45,675 1998  06/07 40 years 

Cary, NC

 —    1,314,197 2,124,513 —   —   1,314,197 2,124,513 3,438,711 73,030 2007  08/07 40 years 

Dothan, AL

 —    773,671 1,886,333 —   —   773,671 1,886,333 2,660,004 84,492 2007  03/07 40 years 

Midland City, AL

 —    728,990 2,538,232 —   —   728,990 2,538,232 3,267,222 129,556 2006  12/06 40 years 

Kash N’ Karry:

            

Brandon, FL

 3,079,596(p) 322,476 1,221,661 —   —   322,476 1,221,661 1,544,137 159,070 1983  03/99 40 years 

Keg Steakhouse:

            

Bellingham, WA (r)

 —    397,443 455,605 —   —   397,443 455,605 853,048 80,206 1981  12/01 40 years 

Lynnwood, WA

 —    1,255,513 649,236 —   —   1,255,513 649,236 1,904,748 114,292 1992  12/01 40 years 

Tacoma, WA

 —    526,792 794,722 —   —   526,792 794,722 1,321,515 139,904 1981  12/01 40 years 

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-8


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which Carried
at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Con-
struction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Kerasotes:

            

Bloomington, IN

 —    2,337,910 4,000,182 —   —   2,337,910 4,000,182 6,338,092 206,676  1987  09/07  25 years 

Bolingbrook, IL

 —    2,937,193 3,032,087 —   —   2,937,193 3,032,087 5,969,280 130,548  1994  09/07  30 years 

Brighton, CO

 —    1,069,710 5,490,668 —   —   1,069,710 5,490,668 6,560,379 177,303  2005  09/07  40 years 

Castle Rock, CO

 —    2,904,550 5,001,791 —   —   2,904,550 5,001,791 7,906,342 161,516  2005  09/07  40 years 

Evansville, IN

 —    1,300,359 4,268,824 —   —   1,300,359 4,268,824 5,569,183 157,540  1999  09/07  35 years 

Galesburg, IL

 —    1,204,699 2,441,058 —   —   1,204,699 2,441,058 3,645,758 78,826  2003  09/07  40 years 

Machesney Park, IL

 —    3,017,551 8,769,548 —   —   3,017,551 8,769,548 11,787,099 283,183  2005  09/07  40 years 

Michigan City, IN

 —    1,995,639 8,421,666 —   —   1,995,639 8,421,666 10,417,305 271,950  2005  09/07  40 years 

Muncie, IN

 —    1,243,157 5,511,584 —   —   1,243,157 5,511,584 6,754,741 177,978  2005  09/07  40 years 

Naperville, IL

 —    6,141,054 11,624,187 —   —   6,141,054 11,624,187 17,765,241 375,364  2006  09/07  40 years 

New Lenox, IL

 —    6,777,804 10,979,958 —   —   6,777,804 10,979,958 17,757,762 354,561  2004  09/07  40 years 

Quincy, IL

 —    1,296,872 2,849,999 —   —   1,296,872 2,849,999 4,146,871 78,036  1982  01/08  35 years 

Schereville, IN

 —    6,619,133 14,225,121 —   —   6,619,133 14,225,121 20,844,254 454,414  1996  01/08  30 years 

Johnson Creek, WI

 —    1,433,427 3,931,692 —   —   1,433,427 3,931,692 5,365,119 107,653  1997  01/08  35 years 

Lake Delton, WI

 —    2,063,267 8,365,867 —   —   2,063,267 8,365,867 10,429,134 229,065  1999  01/08  35 years 

Chicago, IL

 —    7,256,735 10,955,050 —   —   7,256,735 10,955,050 18,211,785 262,465  2007  01/08  40 years 

KFC:

            

Erie, PA

 —    516,508 496,092 —   —   516,508 496,092 1,012,601 87,333  1996  12/01  40 years 

Marysville, WA

 —    646,779 545,592 —   —   646,779 545,592 1,192,371 96,047  1996  12/01  40 years 

Evansville, IN

 —    369,740 766,635 —   —   369,740 766,635 1,136,375 50,310  2004  05/06  40 years 

Fenton, MO

 —    307,068 496,410 —   —   307,068 496,410 803,478 248,747  1985  07/92  33 years 

Kohl’s:

            

Florence, AL

 —    817,661 —   1,046,515 —   817,661 1,046,515 1,864,176 58,866  (i) 06/04  40 years 

Kum & Go:

            

Omaha, NE

 —    392,847 214,280 —   —   392,847 214,280 607,127 37,945  1979  06/05  20 years 

LA Fitness:

            

Centerville, OH

 —    2,700,000 —   —   —   2,700,000 —   2,700,000 (e) (e) 06/08  (e)

Warren, MI

 —    2,360,449 —   —   —   2,360,449 —   2,360,449 (e) (e) 07/08  (e)

Cincinnati, OH

 —    5,145,103 —   —   —   5,145,103 —   5,145,103 (e) (e) 08/08  (e)

Light Restaurant:

            

Columbus, OH

 —    1,032,008 1,107,250 —   —   1,032,008 1,107,250 2,139,258 194,922  1998  12/01  40 years 

Lil’ Champ:

            

Gainesville, FL

 —    900,141 —   1,800,281 —   900,141 1,800,281 2,700,422 80,638  2007  07/05(q) 40 years 

Jacksonville, FL

 —    2,225,177 3,265,315 —   —   2,225,177 3,265,315 5,490,492 48,115  2006  08/05  40 years 

Ocala, FL

 —    845,827 —   1,563,500 —   845,827 1,563,500 2,409,327 60,260  2007  02/06(q) 40 years 

Logan’s Roadhouse:

            

Alexandria, LA

 —    1,217,567 3,048,693 —   —   1,217,567 3,048,693 4,266,260 161,962  1998  11/06  40 years 

Beckley, WV

 —    1,396,024 2,404,817 —   —   1,396,024 2,404,817 3,800,841 127,756  2006  11/06  40 years 

Cookeville, TN

 —    1,262,430 2,270,596 —   —   1,262,430 2,270,596 3,533,026 120,625  1997  11/06  40 years 

Fort Wayne, IN

 —    1,274,315 2,109,860 —   —   1,172,201 2,109,860 3,282,061 112,086  2003  11/06  40 years 

Greenwood, IN

 —    1,341,188 2,105,213 —   —   1,341,188 2,105,213 3,446,401 111,839  2000  11/06  40 years 

Hurst, TX

 —    1,857,628 1,915,877 —   —   1,857,628 1,915,877 3,773,505 101,781  1999  11/06  40 years 

Jackson, TN

 —    1,199,765 2,246,330 —   —   1,199,765 2,246,330 3,446,095 119,336  1994  11/06  40 years 

Lake Charles, LA

 —    1,284,898 2,202,447 —   —   1,284,898 2,202,447 3,487,345 117,005  1998  11/06  40 years 

McAllen, TX

 —    1,607,806 2,177,715 —   —   1,607,806 2,177,715 3,785,521 115,691  2005  11/06  40 years 

Opelika, AL

 —    1,028,484 1,753,045 —   —   1,028,484 1,753,045 2,781,529 93,130  2005  11/06  40 years 

Roanoke, VA

 —    2,302,414 1,947,141 —   —   2,302,414 1,947,141 4,249,555 103,442  1998  11/06  40 years 

San Marcos, TX

 —    836,979 1,453,300 —   —   836,979 1,453,300 2,290,279 77,207  2000  11/06  40 years 

Sanford, FL

 —    1,677,782 1,730,390 —   —   1,677,782 1,730,390 3,408,172 91,927  1999  11/06  40 years 

Smyrna, TN

 —    1,334,998 2,047,465 —   —   1,334,998 2,047,465 3,382,463 108,772  2002  11/06  40 years 

Warner Robins, GA

 —    905,301 1,533,748 —   —   905,301 1,533,748 2,439,049 81,480  2004  11/06  40 years 

Franklin, TN

 —    2,519,485 1,704,790 —   —   2,519,485 1,704,790 4,224,275 87,015  1995  12/06  40 years 

Southaven, MS

 —    1,297,767 1,338,118 —   —   1,297,767 1,338,118 2,635,885 68,300  2005  12/06  40 years 

Lowe’s:

            

Memphis, TN

 —    3,214,835 9,169,885 —   —   3,214,835 9,169,885 12,384,720 1,501,197  2001  06/02  40 years 

Magic China Café:

            

Orlando, FL

 58,124(o) 40,200 110,531 —   —   40,200 110,531 150,731 13,471  2001  02/04  40 years 

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-9


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Magic Mountain:

            

Columbus, OH

 —   2,075,527 1,906,370 —   —   2,075,527 1,906,370 3,981,897 73,475 1990 06/07  40 years

Columbus, OH

 —   5,379,851 2,693,295 —   —   5,379,851 2,693,295 8,073,146 103,804 1990 06/07  40 years

Majestic Liquors:

            

Coffee City, TX

 —   1,330,427 3,858,445 —   —   1,330,427 3,858,445 5,188,872 373,787 1996 02/05  40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

 —   1,651,570 2,017,770 —   —   1,651,570 2,017,770 3,669,340 195,472 2000 02/05  40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

 —   2,505,249 2,138,400 —   —   2,505,249 2,138,400 4,643,649 207,158 1988 02/05  40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

 —   977,290 2,368,447 —   —   977,290 2,368,447 3,345,737 229,443 1997 02/05  40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

 —   611,366 1,608,555 —   —   611,366 1,608,555 2,219,921 155,829 1974 02/05  40 years

Hudson Oaks, TX

 —   361,371 1,029,053 —   —   361,371 1,029,053 1,390,424 99,689 1993 02/05  40 years

Granbury, TX

 —   786,159 1,233,984 —   —   786,159 1,233,984 2,020,143 86,122 2006 05/05(g) 40 years

Dallas, TX

 —   1,554,411 1,228,778 —   —   1,554,411 1,228,778 2,783,189 108,798 1982 06/05  40 years

Dallas, TX

 —   2,407,203 2,050,580 248,000 —   2,407,203 2,298,580 4,705,783 196,995 1971 06/05  40 years

Azle, TX

 —   648,274 859,435 —   —   648,274 859,435 1,507,709 33,124 1970 06/07  40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

 —   574,618 933,091 —   —   574,618 933,091 1,507,709 35,963 1982 06/07  40 years

Lubbock, TX

 —   1,293,214 1,210,826 —   —   1,293,214 1,210,826 2,504,040 44,145 1983 07/07  40 years

Lubbock, TX

 —   2,606,118 2,897,922 —   —   2,606,118 2,897,922 5,504,040 105,653 1983 07/07  40 years

Mattress Firm:

            

Baton Rouge, LA

 —   609,069 913,603 —   —   609,069 913,603 1,522,672 296,982 1995 12/95  40 years

MC Sports:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —   407,880 2,086,371 —   —   407,880 2,086,371 2,494,251 67,372 2007 09/07  40 years

Merchant’s Tires:

            

Hampton, VA

 —   179,835 426,895 —   —   179,835 426,895 606,730 40,466 1986 03/05  40 years

Newport News, VA

 —   233,812 259,046 —   —   233,812 259,046 492,858 24,555 1986 03/05  40 years

Norfolk, VA

 —   398,132 507,743 —   —   398,132 507,743 905,875 48,130 1986 03/05  40 years

Rockville, MD

 —   1,030,156 306,147 —   —   1,030,156 306,147 1,336,303 29,020 1974 03/05  40 years

Washington, DC

 —   623,607 577,948 —   —   623,607 577,948 1,201,555 54,785 1983 03/05  40 years

Mi Pueblo Foods:

            

Watsonville, CA

 —   805,056 1,648,934 —   —   805,056 1,648,934 2,453,990 214,705 1984 03/99  40 years

Michaels:

            

Fairfax, VA

 —   986,131 1,426,254 706,501 —   986,131 2,132,755 3,118,886 552,719 1995 12/95  40 years

Grapevine, TX (r)

 —   1,017,934 2,066,715 —   —   1,017,934 2,066,715 3,084,649 544,665 1998 06/98  40 years

Plymouth Meeting, PA

 —   2,911,111 —   2,594,720 —   2,911,111 2,594,720 5,505,831 561,638 1999 10/98(g) 40 years

Mister Car Wash:

            

Anoka, MN

 —   212,378 214,461 —   —   212,378 214,461 426,839 24,425 1968 04/07  15 years

Brooklyn Park, MN

 —   438,259 778,217 —   —   438,259 778,217 1,216,476 53,178 1985 04/07  25 years

Cedar Rapids, IA

 —   390,848 816,402 —   —   390,848 816,402 1,207,250 55,787 1989 04/07  25 years

Clive, IA

 —   1,141,010 934,829 —   —   1,141,010 934,829 2,075,839 79,850 1983 04/07  20 years

Cottage Grove, MN

 —   274,404 484,572 —   —   274,404 484,572 758,976 33,112 1992 04/07  25 years

Des Moines, IA

 —   212,694 475,795 —   —   212,694 475,795 688,489 40,641 1964 04/07  20 years

Des Moines, IA

 —   248,517 595,659 —   —   248,517 595,659 844,176 33,919 1990 04/07  30 years

Eden Prairie, MN

 —   865,400 751,139 —   —   865,400 751,139 1,616,539 64,160 1984 04/07  20 years

Edina, MN

 —   894,483 686,718 —   —   894,483 686,718 1,581,201 58,657 1985 04/07  20 years

Houston, TX

 —   287,729 465,697 —   —   287,729 465,697 753,426 53,038 1970 04/07  15 years

Houston, TX

 —   2,260,395 1,806,419 —   —   2,260,395 1,806,419 4,066,814 123,439 1975 04/07  25 years

Houston, TX

 —   3,193,137 1,305,127 —   —   3,193,137 1,305,127 4,498,264 63,703 1995 04/07  35 years

Houston, TX

 —   1,846,219 1,592,457 —   —   1,846,219 1,592,457 3,438,676 108,818 1983 04/07  25 years

Houston, TX

 —   1,960,385 1,144,516 —   —   1,960,385 1,144,516 3,104,901 78,209 1983 04/07  25 years

Houston, TX

 —   1,347,305 1,701,671 —   —   1,347,305 1,701,671 3,048,976 96,901 1984 04/07  30 years

Houston, TX

 —   795,775 678,201 —   —   795,775 678,201 1,473,976 46,344 1986 04/07  25 years

Houston, TX

 —   623,760 1,108,129 —   —   623,760 1,108,129 1,731,889 63,102 1988 04/07  30 years

Houston, TX

 —   5,125,771 1,267,125 —   —   5,125,771 1,267,125 6,392,896 61,848 1995 04/07  35 years

Humble, TX

 —   1,204,234 1,516,641 —   —   1,204,234 1,516,641 2,720,875 74,027 1993 04/07  35 years

Plymouth, MN

 —   827,427 181,549 —   —   827,427 181,549 1,008,976 31,015 1955 04/07  10 years

Roseville, MN

 —   861,100 563,575 —   —   861,100 563,575 1,424,675 48,139 1963 04/07  20 years

Spokane, WA

 —   214,246 580,318 —   —   214,246 580,318 794,564 33,046 1990 04/07  30 years

Spokane, WA

 —   1,252,856 1,146,358 —   —   1,252,856 1,146,358 2,399,214 55,953 1997 04/07  35 years

St. Cloud, MN

 —   242,717 391,259 —   —   242,717 391,259 633,976 33,420 1986 04/07  20 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-10


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Stillwater, MN

 —   288,745 214,419 —   —   288,745 214,419 503,164 24,420 1971 04/07  15 years

Sugarland, TX

 —   3,789,092 1,972,484 —   —   3,789,092 1,972,484 5,761,576 96,276 1995 04/07  35 years

West St Paul, MN

 —   835,651 235,825 —   —   835,651 235,825 1,071,476 20,143 1972 04/07  20 years

Rochester, MN

 —   318,975 451,053 —   —   318,975 451,053 770,028 13,626 1994 10/07  40 years

Rochester, MN

 —   1,054,930 2,327,307 —   —   1,054,930 2,327,307 3,382,237 70,304 2003 10/07  40 years

Birmingham, AL

 —   2,377,589 2,144,987 —   —   2,377,589 2,144,987 4,522,576 80,437 1985 11/07  30 years

Clearwater, FL

 —   825,012 765,491 —   —   825,012 765,491 1,590,503 34,447 1969 11/07  25 years

Mesquite, TX

 —   1,595,876 2,201,161 —   —   1,595,876 2,201,161 3,797,037 99,052 1987 11/07  25 years

Seminole, FL

 —   2,165,896 1,495,994 —   —   2,165,896 1,495,994 3,661,890 56,100 1985 11/07  30 years

Tampa, FL

 —   2,992,859 1,669,069 —   —   2,992,859 1,669,069 4,661,928 75,108 1969 11/07  25 years

Vestavia Hills, AL

 —   1,008,794 955,811 —   —   1,008,794 955,811 1,964,605 43,011 1967 11/07  25 years

El Paso, TX

 —   988,006 1,046,430 —   —   988,006 1,046,430 2,034,436 27,407 1998 12/07  40 years

El Paso, TX

 —   1,399,045 1,467,945 —   —   1,399,045 1,467,945 2,866,990 38,446 1991 12/07  40 years

El Paso, TX

 —   664,183 823,521 —   —   664,183 823,521 1,487,704 21,568 1991 12/07  40 years

El Paso, TX

 —   1,423,681 1,305,604 —   —   1,423,681 1,305,604 2,729,285 45,333 1986 12/07  30 years

El Paso, TX

 —   1,807,249 2,287,451 —   —   1,807,249 2,287,451 4,094,700 60,363 1983 12/07  40 years

Mr. E’s Music Supercenter:

            

Arlington, TX

 —   435,002 2,299,881 334,059 —   435,002 2,633,940 3,068,942 707,511 1996 06/96  40 years

M&T Bank:

            

Carlisle, PA

 —   86,964 102,873 —   —   86,964 102,873 189,837 7,396 1988 01/06  40 years

Muchas Gracias Mexican Restaurant:

            

Salem, OR

 —   555,951 735,651 —   —   555,951 735,651 1,291,602 129,505 1996 12/06  40 years

New Covenant Church:

            

Augusta, GA

 —   176,656 674,253 —   —   176,656 674,253 850,909 118,697 1998 12/01  40 years

Office Depot:

            

Arlington, TX

 —   596,024 1,411,432 —   —   596,024 1,411,432 2,007,456 526,266 1991 01/94  40 years

Richmond, VA

 —   888,772 1,948,036 —   —   888,772 1,948,036 2,836,808 613,081 1996 05/96  40 years

Hartsdale, NY

 —   4,508,753 2,327,448 —   —   4,508,753 2,327,448 6,836,201 286,082 1996 09/97  40 years

OfficeMax:

            

Cincinnati, OH

 —   543,489 1,574,551 —   —   543,489 1,574,551 2,118,040 570,101 1994 07/94  40 years

Evanston, IL

 —   1,867,831 1,757,618 —   —   1,867,831 1,757,618 3,625,449 595,881 1995 06/95  40 years

Altamonte Springs, FL

 —   1,689,793 3,050,160 —   —   1,689,793 3,050,160 4,739,953 982,030 1995 01/96  40 years

Cutler Ridge, FL

 —   989,370 1,479,119 —   —   989,370 1,479,119 2,468,489 462,533 1995 06/96  40 years

Sacramento, CA

 —   1,144,167 2,961,206 —   —   1,144,167 2,961,206 4,105,373 888,558 1996 12/96  40 years

Salinas, CA

 —   1,353,217 1,829,325 —   —   1,353,217 1,829,325 3,182,542 543,081 1995 02/97  40 years

Redding, CA

 —   667,174 2,181,563 —   —   667,174 2,181,563 2,848,737 629,472 1997 06/97  40 years

Kelso, WA

 —   868,003 —   1,805,539 —   868,003 1,805,539 2,673,542 494,642 1998 09/97(g) 40 years

Lynchburg, VA

 —   561,509 —   1,851,326 —   561,509 1,851,326 2,412,835 476,331 1998 02/98  40 years

Leesburg, FL

 —   640,019 —   1,929,028 —   640,019 1,929,028 2,569,047 484,266 1998 08/98  40 years

Griffin, GA

 —   685,470 —   1,801,905 —   685,470 1,801,905 2,487,375 437,337 1999 11/98(g) 40 years

Tigard, OR

 —   1,539,873 2,247,321 —   —   1,539,873 2,247,321 3,787,194 568,853 1995 11/98  40 years

Orlando Metro Gymnastics:

            

Orlando, FL

 —   427,661 1,344,660 —   —   427,661 1,344,660 1,772,321 133,065 2003 01/05  40 years

Palais Royale:

            

Sealy, TX

 —   470,485 519,177 1,629,759 —   475,185 2,148,936 2,624,121 155,950 1982 03/99  40 years

Party City:

            

Memphis, TN

 —   266,383 —   1,136,334 —   266,383 1,136,334 1,402,717 271,063 1999 06/99  40 years

Pep Boys:

            

Chicago, IL

 —   1,077,006 3,756,102 —   —   1,077,006 3,756,102 4,833,108 120,732 1993 11/07  35 years

Cicero, IL

 —   1,341,244 3,760,263 —   —   1,341,244 3,760,263 5,101,507 120,866 1993 11/07  35 years

Cornwell Heights, PA

 —   2,058,189 3,101,900 —   —   2,058,189 3,101,900 5,160,089 139,586 1972 11/07  25 years

East Brunswick, NJ

 —   2,449,212 5,025,778 —   —   2,449,212 5,025,778 7,474,990 188,467 1987 11/07  30 years

Jacksonville, FL

 —   809,881 2,330,983 —   —   809,881 2,330,983 3,140,864 74,924 1989 11/07  35 years

Joliet, IL

 —   1,505,821 3,726,894 —   —   1,505,821 3,726,894 5,232,715 119,793 1993 11/07  35 years

Lansing, IL

 —   868,936 3,439,711 —   —   868,936 3,439,711 4,308,647 110,562 1993 11/07  35 years

Las Vegas, NV

 —   1,917,220 2,530,354 —   —   1,917,220 2,530,354 4,447,574 81,333 1989 11/07  35 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-11


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
 Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Marietta, GA

 —   1,311,037 3,555,989 —   —   1,311,037 3,555,989 4,867,026 133,350 1987 11/07 30 years

Marlton, NJ

 —   1,608,391 4,141,816 —   —   1,608,391 4,141,816 5,750,207 155,318 1983 11/07 30 years

Philadelphia, PA

 —   1,300,283 3,830,376 —   —   1,300,283 3,830,376 5,130,659 123,119 1995 11/07 35 years

Quakertown, PA

 —   1,128,592 3,251,721 —   —   1,128,592 3,251,721 4,380,313 104,520 1995 11/07 35 years

Roswell, GA

 —   930,986 2,732,320 —   —   930,986 2,732,320 3,663,306 102,462 2007 11/07 30 years

Turnersville, NJ

 —   989,911 3,493,815 —   —   989,911 3,493,815 4,483,726 131,018 1986 11/07 30 years

Perfect Teeth:

            

Rio Rancho, NM

 —   61,517 122,142 —   —   61,517 122,142 183,659 21,522 1997 12/01 40 years

Perkins Restaurant:

            

Des Moines, IA

 —   255,874 136,103 —   —   255,874 136,103 391,977 48,203 1976 06/05 10 years

Des Moines, IA

 —   225,922 203,330 —   —   225,922 203,330 429,252 72,013 1976 06/05 10 years

Des Moines, IA

 —   269,938 218,248 —   —   269,938 218,248 488,186 77,296 1977 06/05 10 years

Newton, IA

 —   353,816 401,630 —   —   353,816 401,630 755,446 142,244 1979 06/05 10 years

Urbandale, IA

 —   376,690 581,414 —   —   376,690 581,414 958,104 102,959 1979 06/05 20 years

Petco:

            

Grand Forks, ND

 —   306,629 909,671 —   —   306,629 909,671 1,216,301 251,131 1996 12/97 40 years

Petro Express:

            

Belmont, NC

 —   1,507,766 1,622,165 —   —   1,507,766 1,622,165 3,129,931 79,177 2001 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,025,233 1,604,698 —   —   1,025,233 1,604,698 2,629,931 91,379 1986 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,292,976 1,836,951 —   —   1,292,976 1,836,951 3,129,927 104,604 1987 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,457,711 2,047,217 —   —   1,457,711 2,047,217 3,504,928 116,578 1987 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,290,989 1,838,939 —   —   1,290,989 1,838,939 3,129,928 104,717 1988 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,777,717 1,977,210 —   —   1,777,717 1,977,210 3,754,927 112,591 1992 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,322,626 869,805 —   —   1,322,626 869,805 2,192,431 49,531 1982 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   506,975 697,953 —   —   506,975 697,953 1,204,928 59,617 1967 04/07 20 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   629,337 875,591 —   —   629,337 875,591 1,504,928 49,860 1986 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   429,432 425,496 —   —   429,432 425,496 854,928 24,230 1983 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   2,315,876 2,064,051 —   —   2,315,876 2,064,051 4,379,927 100,745 1996 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,037,423 1,467,505 —   —   1,037,423 1,467,505 2,504,928 71,628 1997 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   2,165,285 1,964,643 —   —   2,165,285 1,964,643 4,129,928 95,893 1997 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,339,787 1,790,140 —   —   1,339,787 1,790,140 3,129,927 87,376 1998 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   2,784,480 3,720,448 —   —   2,784,480 3,720,448 6,504,928 181,593 1998 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,532,107 1,972,821 —   —   1,532,107 1,972,821 3,504,928 96,292 1998 04/07 35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,030,292 1,724,636 —   —   1,030,292 1,724,636 2,754,928 98,208 1983 04/07 30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,810,009 2,569,919 —   —   1,810,009 2,569,919 4,379,928 109,757 2004 04/07 40 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,257,718 1,559,712 —   —   1,257,718 1,559,712 2,817,430 66,613 2004 04/07 40 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,696,967 2,418,814 —   —   1,696,967 2,418,814 4,115,781 103,303 2005 04/07 40 years

Concord, NC

 —   2,144,009 1,985,919 —   —   2,144,009 1,985,919 4,129,928 96,932 2000 04/07 35 years

Concord, NC

 —   1,828,292 1,676,647 —   —   1,828,292 1,676,647 3,504,939 81,836 2002 04/07 35 years

Conover, NC

 —   917,090 1,275,337 —   —   917,090 1,275,337 2,192,427 62,249 1999 04/07 35 years

Cornelius, NC

 —   1,653,202 2,664,228 —   —   1,653,202 2,664,228 4,317,430 130,040 2000 04/07 35 years

Denver, NC

 —   2,317,321 1,750,110 —   —   2,317,321 1,750,110 4,067,431 85,422 1999 04/07 35 years

Fort Mill, SC

 —   3,825,461 2,554,459 —   —   3,825,461 2,554,459 6,379,920 124,682 1998 04/07 35 years

Fort Mill, SC

 —   1,883,231 1,559,190 —   —   1,883,231 1,559,190 3,442,421 88,787 1988 04/07 30 years

Gastonia, NC

 —   964,906 1,227,521 —   —   964,906 1,227,521 2,192,427 59,915 2001 04/07 35 years

Gastonia, NC

 —   335,424 544,504 —   —   335,424 544,504 879,928 23,255 2000 04/07 40 years

Gastonia, NC

 —   1,070,390 1,184,517 —   —   1,070,390 1,184,517 2,254,907 57,816 1990 04/07 35 years

Gastonia, NC

 —   744,571 760,356 —   —   744,571 760,356 1,504,927 32,474 2003 04/07 40 years

Hickory, NC

 —   1,975,267 1,529,667 —   —   1,975,267 1,529,667 3,504,934 74,662 2002 04/07 35 years

Kings Mountain, NC

 —   1,210,397 982,031 —   —   1,210,397 982,031 2,192,428 47,932 1988 04/07 35 years

Lake Wylie, SC

 —   1,972,180 1,282,737 —   —   1,972,180 1,282,737 3,254,917 62,610 2003 04/07 35 years

Lake Wylie, SC

 —   1,380,939 2,061,482 —   —   1,380,939 2,061,482 3,442,421 100,620 1998 04/07 35 years

Lincolnton, NC

 —   722,773 532,154 —   —   722,773 532,154 1,254,927 30,303 1989 04/07 30 years

Lincolnton, NC

 —   2,358,754 1,771,201 —   —   2,358,754 1,771,201 4,129,955 86,451 2000 04/07 35 years

Matthews, NC

 —   1,196,544 1,745,883 —   —   1,196,544 1,745,883 2,942,427 99,418 1987 04/07 30 years

Mineral Springs, NC

 —   677,575 577,353 —   —   677,575 577,353 1,254,928 24,658 2002 04/07 40 years

Monroe, NC

 —   420,625 834,302 —   —   420,625 834,302 1,254,927 40,722 1997 04/07 35 years

Monroe, NC

 —   709,082 795,846 —   —   709,082 795,846 1,504,928 38,845 1999 04/07 35 years

Monroe, NC

 —   857,369 1,022,565 —   —   857,369 1,022,565 1,879,934 43,672 2004 04/07 40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-12


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Con-
struction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Rock Hill, SC

 —   2,118,790 1,886,128 —   —   2,118,790 1,886,128 4,004,918 92,061  1998  04/07  35 years 

Rock Hill, SC

 —   3,095,160 1,909,758 —   —   3,095,160 1,909,758 5,004,918 93,214  1999  04/07  35 years 

Rock Hill, SC

 —   777,836 727,082 —   —   777,836 727,082 1,504,918 41,403  1990  04/07  30 years 

Statesville, NC

 —   1,885,746 2,181,682 —   —   1,885,746 2,181,682 4,067,428 106,487  1999  04/07  35 years 

Thomasville, NC

 —   993,898 1,761,032 —   —   993,898 1,761,032 2,754,930 85,955  2000  04/07  35 years 

Waxhaw, NC

 —   508,235 746,698 —   —   508,235 746,698 1,254,933 31,890  2002  04/07  40 years 

York, SC

 —   2,306,150 1,448,777 —   —   2,306,150 1,448,777 3,754,927 70,714  1999  04/07  35 years 

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,231,265 1,214,175 —   —   1,231,265 1,214,175 2,445,440 49,326  1997  05/07  40 years 

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,849,143 2,279,590 —   —   1,849,143 2,279,590 4,128,733 92,608  2005  05/07  40 years 

Rock Hill, SC

 —   3,107,907 2,145,815 —   —   3,107,907 2,145,815 5,253,722 87,174  1999  05/07  40 years 

Pet Smart:

            

Chicago, IL

 —   2,724,138 3,565,721 —   —   2,724,138 3,565,721 6,289,859 917,422  1998  09/98  40 years 

Pet Paradise:

            

Houston, TX

 —   417,054 2,306,239 —   —   417,054 2,306,239 2,723,293 45,644  2008  03/08  40 years 

Bunnell, FL

 —   316,255 881,311 —   —   316,255 881,311 1,197,566 15,738  1997  04/08  40 years 

Houston, TX

 —   535,101 —   —   —   535,101 —   535,101 (e) (e) 09/08(q) (e)

Charlotte, NC

 —   825,000 —   —   —   825,000 —   825,000 (e) (e) 11/08(q) (e)

Davie, FL

 —   1,137,752 1,068,673 —   —   1,137,752 1,068,673 2,206,425 1,272  2003  11/08  35 years 

Pier 1 Imports:

            

Anchorage, AK

 —   928,321 1,662,584 —   —   928,321 1,662,584 2,590,905 533,651  1995  02/96  40 years 

Memphis, TN

 —   713,319 821,770 —   —   713,319 821,770 1,535,089 237,115  1997  09/96(f) 40 years 

Sanford, FL

 —   738,051 803,082 —   —   738,051 803,082 1,541,133 216,665  1998  06/97(f) 40 years 

Knoxville, TN

 —   467,169 734,833 —   —   467,169 734,833 1,202,002 182,943  1999  01/98(f) 40 years 

Mason, OH

 —   593,571 885,047 —   —   593,571 885,047 1,478,617 211,120  1999  06/98(f) 40 years 

Harlingen, TX

 —   316,640 756,406 —   —   316,640 756,406 1,073,046 174,131  1999  11/98(f) 40 years 

Valdosta, GA

 —   390,838 805,912 —   —   390,838 805,912 1,196,750 183,849  1999  01/99(f) 40 years 

Pizza Hut:

            

Monroeville, AL

 —   547,300 44,237 —   —   547,300 44,237 591,537 7,788  1976  12/01  40 years 

Popeye’s:

            

Snellville, GA

 —   642,169 436,512 —   —   642,169 436,512 1,078,681 76,844  1995  12/01  40 years 

Pueblo Viejo Restaurant:

            

Chandler, AZ

 —   654,765 765,164 33,821 —   654,765 798,985 1,453,750 142,599  1997  12/01  40 years 

Pull-A-Part:

            

Birmingham, AL

 —   1,164,780 2,090,094 —   —   1,164,780 2,090,094 3,254,874 124,099  1964  08/06  40 years 

Augusta, GA

 —   1,414,381 —   1,450,906 —   1,414,381 1,450,906 2,865,287 55,920  2007  08/06(q) 40 years 

Conley, GA

 —   1,685,604 1,387,170 —   —   1,685,604 1,387,170 3,072,774 82,363  1999  08/06  40 years 

Norcross, GA

 —   1,831,129 1,040,317 —   —   1,831,129 1,040,317 2,871,446 61,769  1998  08/06  40 years 

Louisville, KY

 —   3,205,591 1,531,842 —   —   3,205,591 1,531,842 4,737,433 90,953  2006  08/06  40 years 

Harvey, LA

 —   1,886,627 —   4,325,561 —   1,886,627 4,325,561 6,212,188 49,564  2008  08/06(q) 40 years 

Charlotte, NC

 —   2,912,842 1,724,045 —   —   2,912,842 1,724,045 4,636,887 102,365  2006  08/06  40 years 

Knoxville, TN

 —   961,067 —   2,384,443 —   961,067 2,384,443 3,345,510 86,933  2007  08/06(q) 40 years 

Nashville, TN

 —   2,164,234 1,414,129 —   —   2,164,234 1,414,129 3,578,363 83,964  2006  08/06  40 years 

Lafayette, LA

 —   1,035,679 —   2,225,578 —   1,035,679 2,225,578 3,261,257 57,958  2007  08/06(q) 40 years 

Cleveland, OH

 —   4,555,684 —   2,096,448 —   4,555,684 2,096,448 6,652,132 58,963  2007  08/06(q) 40 years 

Montgomery, AL

 —   934,023 —   2,012,612 —   934,023 2,012,612 2,946,635 56,605  2007  11/06(q) 40 years 

Jackson, MS

 —   1,314,846 —   —   —   1,314,846 —   1,314,846 (e) (e) 12/06(q) (e)

Baton Rouge, LA

 —   890,122 —   —   —   890,122 —   890,122 (e) (e) 01/07(q) (e)

Memphis, TN

 —   1,779,169 —   2,964,143 —   1,779,169 2,964,143 4,743,312 46,315  2008  05/07(q) 40 years 

Mobile, AL

 —   549,485 —   —   —   549,485 —   549,485 (e) (e) 06/07(q) (e)

Winston-Salem, NC

 —   845,948 —   —   —   845,948 —   845,948 (e) (e) 08/07(q) (e)

Lithonia, GA

 —   2,409,908 —   —   —   2,409,908 —   2,409,908 (e) (e) 08/07(q) (e)

Columbia, SC

 —   934,755 —   —   —   934,755 —   934,755 (e) (e) 09/07(q) (e)

Akron, OH

 —   1,064,150 —   —   —   1,064,150 —   1,064,150 (e) (e) 10/08(q) (e)

QuikTrip:

            

Alpharetta, GA

 —   1,048,309 606,916 —   —   1,048,309 606,916 1,655,225 53,737  1996  06/05  40 years 

Clive, IA

 —   623,473 556,970 —   —   623,473 556,970 1,180,443 65,753  1994  06/05  30 years 

Des Moines, IA

 —   258,759 792,448 —   —   258,759 792,448 1,051,207 93,553  1990  06/05  30 years 

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-13


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which Carried
at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Des Moines, IA

 —   379,435 455,322 —   —   379,435 455,322 834,757 53,753 1996 06/05  30 years

Gainesville, GA

 —   592,192 912,962 —   —   592,192 912,962 1,505,154 107,780 1989 06/05  30 years

Herculaneum, MO

 —   856,001 1,612,887 —   —   856,001 1,612,887 2,468,888 190,410 1991 06/05  30 years

Johnston, IA

 —   394,289 385,119 —   —   394,289 385,119 779,408 45,465 1991 06/05  30 years

Lee’s Summit, MO

 —   373,770 1,224,099 —   —   373,770 1,224,099 1,597,869 108,384 1999 06/05  40 years

Norcross, GA

 —   948,051 293,896 —   —   948,051 293,896 1,241,947 34,696 1993 06/05  30 years

Norcross, GA

 —   844,216 296,867 —   —   838,826 296,867 1,135,693 35,047 1989 06/05  30 years

Norcross, GA

 —   966,145 202,430 —   —   966,145 202,430 1,168,575 23,898 1994 06/05  30 years

Olathe, KS

 —   792,656 1,391,981 —   —   792,656 1,391,981 2,184,637 123,248 1999 06/05  40 years

Tulsa, OK

 —   1,224,843 649,917 —   —   1,224,843 649,917 1,874,760 76,726 1990 06/05  30 years

Urbandale, IA

 —   339,566 764,025 —   —   339,566 764,025 1,103,591 67,648 1993 06/05  40 years

Wichita, KS

 —   127,250 542,934 —   —   127,250 542,934 670,184 64,096 1990 06/05  30 years

Wichita, KS

 —   118,012 453,891 —   —   113,236 453,891 567,127 53,584 1989 06/05  30 years

Woodstock, GA

 —   488,383 1,041,883 —   —   488,383 1,041,883 1,530,266 92,250 1997 06/05  40 years

Quizno’s:

            

Rio Rancho, NM

 —   48,566 96,428 13,398 —   48,566 109,826 158,392 18,941 1997 12/01  40 years

Lapeer, MI

 —   28,820 208,194 —   —   28,820 208,194 237,014 7,157  10/07  40 years

Qwest Corporation Service Center:

            

Cedar Rapids, IA

 —   184,490 628,943 —   —   184,490 628,943 813,433 111,375 1976 06/05  20 years

Decorah, IA

 —   71,899 271,620 —   —   71,899 271,620 343,519 96,199 1974 06/05  10 years

Rally’s:

            

Toledo, OH

 —   125,882 319,770 —   —   125,882 319,770 445,652 136,120 1989 07/92  39 years

REB Oil:

            

Deerfield Beach, FL

 —   769,522 273,756 —   —   769,522 273,756 1,043,278 20,817 1980 12/05  40 years

Lake Placid, FL

 —   2,531,533 1,157,265 —   —   2,531,533 1,157,265 3,688,798 93,719 1990 12/05  40 years

Red Lion Chinese:

            

Cohoes, NY

 —   16,121 86,894 841 —   16,121 87,735 103,856 9,369 1994 09/04  40 years

Reliable:

            

St. Louis, MO

 —   2,077,893 13,762,491 —   —   2,077,893 13,762,491 15,840,384 1,536,666 1975 05/04  40 years

Rent-A-Center:

            

Rio Rancho, NM

 —   145,698 289,284 40,193 —   145,698 329,477 475,175 57,150 1997 12/01  40 years

Rite Aid:

            

Douglasville, GA

 —   413,438 995,209 —   —   413,438 995,209 1,408,647 321,508 1996 01/96  40 years

Conyers, GA

 —   574,666 998,900 —   —   574,666 998,900 1,573,566 288,224 1997 06/97  40 years

Augusta, GA

 —   568,606 1,326,748 —   —   568,606 1,326,748 1,895,354 366,238 1997 12/97  40 years

Riverdale, GA

 —   1,088,896 1,707,448 —   —   1,088,896 1,707,448 2,796,344 471,327 1997 12/97  40 years

Warner Robins, GA

 —   707,488 —   1,227,330 —   707,488 1,227,330 1,934,818 305,554 1999 03/98(g) 40 years

Mobile, AL

 —   1,136,618 1,694,187 —   —   1,136,618 1,694,187 2,830,805 298,248 2000 12/01  40 years

Orange Beach, AL

 —   1,409,980 1,996,043 —   —   1,409,980 1,996,043 3,406,023 351,387 2000 12/01  40 years

Thorndale, PA

 —   2,260,618 2,472,039 —   —   2,260,618 2,472,039 4,732,657 424,882 2001 02/02  40 years

West Mifflin, PA

 —   1,401,632 2,043,862 —   —   1,401,632 2,043,862 3,445,494 351,289 1999 02/02  40 years

Norfolk, VA

 —   2,742,194 1,796,508 —   —   2,742,194 1,796,508 4,538,702 308,775 2001 02/02  40 years

Albany, NY

 —   24,707 867,257 —   —   24,707 867,257 891,964 93,049 1994 09/04  40 years

Albany, NY (r)

 —   33,794 823,923 —   —   33,794 823,923 857,717 88,462 1992 09/04  40 years

Hudson Falls, NY

 —   56,737 780,091 38,787 —   56,737 818,878 875,615 85,346 1990 09/04  40 years

Saratoga Springs, NY

 —   762,303 590,978 —   —   762,303 590,978 1,353,281 63,407 1980 09/04  40 years

Monticello, NY

 781,014 664,400 768,795 —   —   664,400 768,795 1,433,195 72,875 1996 03/05  40 years

Rite Rug:

            

Columbus, OH

 —   1,596,197 934,236 13,345 —   1,604,615 939,163 2,543,778 96,819 1970 11/04  40 years

Road Ranger:

            

Belvidere, IL

 —   748,237 1,256,106 —   —   748,237 1,256,106 2,004,344 79,815 1997 06/06  40 years

Brazil, IN

 —   2,199,280 907,034 —   —   2,199,280 907,034 3,106,314 57,634 1990 06/06  40 years

Cherry Valley, IL

 —   1,409,312 1,897,360 —   —   1,409,312 1,897,360 3,306,672 120,561 1991 06/06  40 years

Cottage Grove, WI

 —   2,174,548 1,733,398 —   —   2,174,548 1,733,398 3,907,946 110,143 1990 06/06  40 years

Decatur, IL

 —   815,213 1,314,354 —   —   815,213 1,314,354 2,129,568 83,516 2002 06/06  40 years

Dekalb, IL

 —   747,109 1,657,951 —   —   747,109 1,657,951 2,405,060 105,349 2000 06/06  40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-14


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Elk Run Heights, IA

 —   1,537,734 2,470,191 —   —   1,537,734 2,470,191 4,007,925 156,960 1989 06/06  40 years

Lake Station, IN

 —   3,171,775 1,111,643 —   —   3,171,775 1,111,643 4,283,418 70,636 1987 06/06  40 years

Mendota, IL

 —   959,012 1,295,780 —   —   959,012 1,295,780 2,254,792 82,336 1996 06/06  40 years

Oakdale, WI

 —   1,844,068 1,663,137 —   —   1,844,068 1,663,137 3,507,205 105,679 1998 06/06  40 years

Rockford, IL

 —   1,094,045 1,661,684 —   —   1,094,045 1,661,684 2,755,729 105,586 1996 06/06  40 years

Rockford, IL

 —   623,214 1,331,082 —   —   623,214 1,331,082 1,954,296 84,579 2000 06/06  40 years

Springfield, IL

 —   704,648 1,500,279 —   —   704,648 1,500,279 2,204,927 95,330 1997 06/06  40 years

Springfield, IL

 —   1,794,961 1,862,562 —   —   1,794,961 1,862,562 3,657,523 118,350 1978 06/06  40 years

Champaign, IL

 —   3,241,075 2,007,662 —   —   3,241,075 2,007,662 5,248,737 94,109 2006 02/07  40 years

Dekalb, IL

 —   504,730 1,503,084 —   —   504,730 1,503,084 2,007,814 70,457 2004 02/07  40 years

Fenton, MO

 —   2,583,565 2,621,722 —   —   2,583,565 2,621,722 5,205,287 122,893 2007 02/07  40 years

Hampshire, IL

 —   1,307,002 1,500,812 1,629,412 —   1,307,002 3,130,224 4,437,226 113,594 1988 02/07(f) 40 years

Princeton, IL

 —   1,141,447 3,066,368 —   —   1,141,447 3,066,368 4,207,815 143,736 2003 02/07  40 years

South Beloit, IL

 —   3,823,872 2,308,942 —   —   3,823,872 2,308,942 6,132,814 108,232 2002 02/07  40 years

Cedar Rapids, IA

 —   1,024,606 983,509 —   —   1,024,606 983,509 2,008,115 44,053 1990 03/07  40 years

Marion, IA

 —   736,574 1,071,226 —   —   736,574 1,071,226 1,807,800 47,982 1974 03/07  40 years

Okawville, IL

 —   929,718 1,147,323 —   —   929,718 1,147,323 2,077,041 39,439 1997 08/07  40 years

Dubuque, IA

 —   560,523 1,941,477 —   —   560,523 1,941,477 2,502,000 62,694 2000 09/07  40 years

Belvidere, IL

 —   520,800 1,053,470 —   —   520,800 1,053,470 1,574,270 29,629 2007 09/07(f) 40 years

South Beloit, IL

 —   1,182,152 1,324,429 —   —   1,182,152 1,324,429 2,506,581 37,250 2007 09/07(f) 40 years

Dry Ridge, KY

 —   892,290 1,945,598 —   —   892,290 1,945,598 2,837,889 45,938 1973 04/08  40 years

Florence, KY

 —   615,432 1,241,916 —   —   615,432 1,241,916 1,857,348 25,134 1990 04/08  40 years

Alexandria, KY

 —   624,348 1,305,776 —   —   624,348 1,305,776 1,930,124 26,426 1993 04/08  40 years

Florence, KY

 —   740,762 1,271,707 —   —   740,762 1,271,707 2,012,469 25,737 1994 04/08  40 years

Wilder, KY

 —   953,755 1,902,402 —   —   953,755 1,902,402 2,856,157 38,501 1994 04/08  40 years

Florence, KY

 —   884,098 1,557,307 —   —   884,098 1,557,307 2,441,405 31,517 1995 04/08  40 years

Covington, KY

 —   486,211 1,419,618 —   —   486,211 1,419,618 1,905,829 28,730 1996 04/08  40 years

Hebron, KY

 —   1,522,347 2,983,691 —   —   1,522,347 2,983,691 4,506,038 60,384 1996 04/08  40 years

Robb & Stucky:

            

Ft. Myers, FL

 —   2,188,440 6,225,401 —   —   2,188,440 6,225,401 8,413,841 1,737,491 1997 12/97  40 years

Roger & Mary’s:

            

Kenosha, WI

 —   1,917,606 3,431,364 —   —   1,917,606 3,431,364 5,348,970 1,013,997 1992 02/97  40 years

Ross Dress For Less:

            

Coral Gables, FL

 —   1,782,346 1,661,174 —   —   1,782,346 1,661,174 3,443,520 470,246 1994 06/96  40 years

Lodi, CA

 —   613,710 1,414,592 —   —   613,710 1,414,592 2,028,302 184,192 1984 03/99  40 years

Rue 21:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —   126,170 645,384 —   —   126,170 645,384 771,554 20,841 2007 09/07  40 years

Sally Beauty Supply:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —   32,630 166,910 —   —   32,630 166,910 199,540 5,390 2007 09/07  40 years

Schlotzsky’s Deli:

            

Phoenix, AZ

 —   706,306 315,469 —   —   706,306 315,469 1,021,775 55,536 1995 12/01  40 years

Scottsdale, AZ

 —   717,138 310,610 —   —   717,138 310,610 1,027,748 54,680 1995 12/01  40 years

7-Eleven:

            

Land O’ Lakes, FL

 —   1,076,572 —   816,944 —   1,076,572 816,944 1,893,516 203,385 1999 10/98(g) 40 years

Tampa, FL

 —   1,080,670 —   917,432 —   1,080,670 917,432 1,998,102 224,580 1999 12/98(g) 40 years

Shek’s Chinese Express:

            

Eden Prairie, MN

 —   64,916 261,347 —   —   64,916 261,347 326,263 43,113 1997 12/01  40 years

Shoes on a Shoestring:

            

Albuquerque, NM

 —   1,441,777 2,335,475 —   —   1,441,777 2,335,475 3,777,251 673,882 1997 06/97  40 years

Shop-a-Snak:

            

Jasper, AL

 —   551,417 747,418 —   —   551,417 747,418 1,298,835 49,049 1998 05/06  40 years

Bessemer, AL

 —   563,863 742,457 —   —   563,863 742,457 1,306,320 48,724 2002 05/06  40 years

Birmingham, AL

 —   489,664 769,343 —   —   489,664 769,343 1,259,007 50,488 1992 05/06  40 years

Birmingham, AL

 —   438,536 704,005 —   —   438,536 704,005 1,142,541 46,200 1989 05/06  40 years

Birmingham, AL

 —   361,182 744,195 —   —   361,182 744,195 1,105,377 48,838 1989 05/06  40 years

Chelsea, AL

 —   391,275 627,502 —   —   391,275 627,502 1,018,777 41,180 1981 05/06  40 years

Homewood, AL

 —   467,950 656,964 —   —   467,950 656,964 1,124,914 43,113 1990 05/06  40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-15


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
  Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Hoover, AL

 —    712,752 864,527 —    —   712,752 864,527 1,577,279 56,735 1998  05/06  40 years 

Hoover, AL

 —    764,461 1,156,598 —    —   764,461 1,156,598 1,921,059 75,902 2005  05/06  40 years 

Hoover, AL

 —    445,980 671,989 —    —   445,980 671,989 1,117,969 44,099 1989  05/06  40 years 

Trussville, AL

 —    271,728 541,741 —    —   271,728 541,741 813,469 35,552 1992  05/06  40 years 

Tuscaloosa, AL

 —    385,947 732,669 —    —   385,947 732,669 1,118,616 48,081 1991  05/06  40 years 

Tuscaloosa, AL

 —    525,165 462,868 —    —   525,165 462,868 988,033 30,376 1991  05/06  40 years 

Tuscaloosa, AL

 —    431,917 559,403 —    —   431,917 559,403 991,320 36,711 1991  05/06  40 years 

Shop & Save:

            

Homestead, PA

 —    1,139,419 —   2,158,167(j) —   1,139,419 2,158,167 3,297,586 235,899 1994  02/97  40 years 

Soaks Express Car Wash:

            

Ankeny, IA

 —    661,958 —   —    —   661,958 —   661,958  (e) 06/05  (e)

Sonic Automotive:

            

Charlotte, NC

 —    3,618,837 4,853,587 —    —   3,618,837 4,853,587 8,472,424 197,177 1996  05/07  40 years 

Spa and Nails Club:

            

Orlando, FL

 58,124(o) 40,200 110,531 —    —   40,200 110,531 150,731 13,471 2001  02/04  40 years 

Spencer’s A/C & Appliances:

            

Glendale, AZ

 —    341,713 982,429 —    —   341,713 982,429 1,324,143 231,862 1999  12/98(g) 40 years 

Sports Authority:

            

Tampa, FL

 —    2,127,503 1,521,730 —    —   2,127,503 1,521,730 3,649,233 475,858 1994  06/96  40 years 

Sarasota, FL

 —    1,427,840 1,702,852 —    —   1,427,840 1,702,852 3,130,692 209,309 1996  09/97  40 years 

Memphis, TN (r)

 —    820,340 —   2,573,264  —   820,340 2,573,264 3,393,604 656,718 1998  12/97(g) 40 years 

Little Rock, AR

 —    3,113,375 2,660,206 —    —   3,113,375 2,660,206 5,773,581 684,449 1997  09/98  40 years 

Woodbridge, NJ

 —    3,749,990 5,982,660 —    —   3,749,990 5,982,660 9,732,650 891,167 1994  01/03  40 years 

Sportsman’s Warehouse:

            

Sioux Falls, SD

 —    2,619,810 1,929,895 —    —   2,619,810 1,929,895 4,549,705 227,835 1998  06/05  30 years 

Stock Building Supply:

            

Hillman, MI

 —    166,866 822,950 —    —   166,866 822,950 989,816 45,434 1952  10/06  40 years 

Stone Mountain Chevrolet:

            

Lilburn, GA

 —    3,027,056 4,685,189 —    —   3,027,056 4,685,189 7,712,245 512,443 2004  08/04  40 years 

Stop & Go:

            

Grand Prairie, TX

 —    421,254 684,568 —    —   421,254 684,568 1,105,822 120,512 1986  12/01  40 years 

Kennedale, TX

 —    399,988 692,190 —    —   391,208 692,190 1,083,398 121,854 1985  12/01  40 years 

Stripes:

            

Brownsville, TX

 —    1,842,992 1,418,941 —    —   1,842,992 1,418,941 3,261,933 107,899 2000  12/05  40 years 

Brownsville, TX

 —    1,181,713 1,105,326 —    —   1,181,713 1,105,326 2,287,039 84,051 2000  12/05  40 years 

Brownsville, TX

 —    2,915,173 1,800,409 —    —   2,915,173 1,800,409 4,715,582 136,906 2000  12/05  40 years 

Brownsville, TX

 —    2,416,656 1,828,304 —    —   2,416,656 1,828,304 4,244,960 139,027 2000  12/05  40 years 

Brownsville, TX

 —    1,015,092 1,307,774 —    —   1,015,092 1,307,774 2,322,866 99,445 2003  12/05  40 years 

Brownsville, TX

 —    1,038,788 1,144,916 —    —   1,038,788 1,144,916 2,183,704 87,061 2004  12/05  40 years 

Brownsville, TX

 —    1,392,201 1,443,817 —    —   1,392,201 1,443,817 2,836,018 109,790 2005  12/05  40 years 

Brownsville, TX

 —    1,279,447 1,014,702 —    —   1,279,447 1,014,702 2,294,149 77,160 1990  12/05  40 years 

Brownsville, TX

 —    2,529,864 1,124,953 —    —   2,529,864 1,124,953 3,654,817 85,543 1990  12/05  40 years 

Brownsville, TX

 —    2,033,467 1,287,564 —    —   2,033,467 1,287,564 3,321,031 97,908 1995  12/05  40 years 

Brownsville, TX

 —    933,149 699,086 —    —   933,149 699,086 1,632,235 53,160 1999  12/05  40 years 

Corpus Christi, TX

 —    1,384,743 1,418,948 —    —   1,384,743 1,418,948 2,803,691 107,899 1982  12/05  40 years 

Corpus Christi, TX

 —    1,308,418 2,151,142 —    —   1,308,418 2,151,142 3,459,560 163,576 1995  12/05  40 years 

Corpus Christi, TX

 —    852,629 1,416,208 —    —   852,629 1,416,208 2,268,837 107,691 2005  12/05  40 years 

Corpus Christi, TX

 —    1,399,622 1,530,910 —    —   1,399,622 1,530,910 2,930,532 116,413 1984  12/05  40 years 

Corpus Christi, TX

 —    703,182 1,036,506 —    —   703,182 1,036,506 1,739,688 78,818 1986  12/05  40 years 

Donna, TX

 —    1,003,876 1,126,591 —    —   1,003,876 1,126,591 2,130,466 85,668 1995  12/05  40 years 

Edinburg, TX

 —    1,317,408 1,623,891 —    —   1,317,408 1,623,891 2,941,299 123,483 1999  12/05  40 years 

Edinburg, TX

 —    970,145 1,286,006 —    —   970,145 1,286,006 2,256,151 97,790 2003  12/05  40 years 

Falfurias, TX

 —    4,243,940 4,458,007 —    —   4,243,940 4,458,007 8,701,947 338,994 2002  12/05  40 years 

Freer, TX

 —    1,150,862 1,158,251 —    —   1,150,862 1,158,251 2,309,113 88,075 1984  12/05  40 years 

George West, TX

 —    1,243,224 695,074 —    —   1,243,224 695,074 1,938,298 52,855 1996  12/05  40 years 

Harlingen, TX

 —    906,427 952,530 —    —   906,427 952,530 1,858,957 72,432 1991  12/05  40 years 

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-16


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
 Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Harlingen, TX

 —   753,595 1,152,311 —   —   753,595 1,152,311 1,905,906 87,624 1999 12/05 40 years

Harlingen, TX

 —   755,002 600,721 —   —   755,002 600,721 1,355,723 45,680 1987 12/05 40 years

La Feria, TX

 —   900,096 1,346,774 —   —   900,096 1,346,774 2,246,870 102,411 1988 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   1,552,558 1,774,827 —   —   1,552,558 1,774,827 3,327,385 134,961 2000 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   840,629 738,907 —   —   840,629 738,907 1,579,536 56,188 2001 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   736,451 670,332 —   —   736,451 670,332 1,406,784 50,973 1984 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   459,027 459,946 —   —   459,027 459,946 918,973 34,975 1983 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   1,494,871 1,400,482 —   —   1,494,871 1,400,482 2,895,353 106,495 1993 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   675,128 533,047 —   —   675,128 533,047 1,208,175 40,534 1993 12/05 40 years

Lawton, OK

 —   696,670 964,441 —   —   696,670 964,441 1,661,111 73,338 1984 12/05 40 years

Los Indios, TX

 —   1,386,972 1,456,932 —   —   1,386,972 1,456,932 2,843,903 110,787 2005 12/05 40 years

McAllen, TX

 —   975,217 1,029,752 —   —   975,217 1,029,752 2,004,968 78,304 2003 12/05 40 years

McAllen, TX

 —   987,020 893,376 —   —   987,020 893,376 1,880,396 67,934 1999 12/05 40 years

Mission, TX

 —   880,169 1,101,301 —   —   880,169 1,101,301 1,981,471 83,745 1999 12/05 40 years

Mission, TX

 —   1,125,457 1,213,398 —   —   1,125,457 1,213,398 2,338,855 92,269 2003 12/05 40 years

Olmito, TX

 —   3,687,971 2,880,099 —   —   3,687,971 2,880,099 6,568,070 219,007 2002 12/05 40 years

Pharr, TX

 —   981,840 1,177,948 —   —   981,840 1,177,948 2,159,788 89,573 1988 12/05 40 years

Pharr, TX

 —   784,402 804,743 —   —   784,402 804,743 1,589,144 61,194 2000 12/05 40 years

Pharr, TX

 —   2,426,134 1,880,867 —   —   2,426,134 1,880,867 4,307,001 143,024 2003 12/05 40 years

Port Isabel, TX

 —   2,062,009 1,298,501 —   —   2,062,009 1,298,501 3,360,510 98,740 1994 12/05 40 years

Portland, TX

 —   655,735 914,512 —   —   655,735 914,512 1,570,247 69,541 1983 12/05 40 years

Progresso, TX

 —   1,768,974 1,811,221 —   —   1,768,974 1,811,221 3,580,195 137,728 1999 12/05 40 years

Riviera, TX

 —   2,351,060 2,158,069 —   —   2,351,060 2,158,069 4,509,128 164,103 2005 12/05 40 years

San Benito, TX

 —   1,103,210 1,586,235 —   —   1,103,210 1,586,235 2,689,445 120,620 2005 12/05 40 years

San Benito, TX

 —   790,629 1,857,158 —   —   790,629 1,857,158 2,647,787 141,221 1994 12/05 40 years

San Juan, TX

 —   1,123,838 1,171,582 —   —   1,123,838 1,171,582 2,295,420 89,089 1996 12/05 40 years

San Juan, TX

 —   1,424,383 1,545,557 —   —   1,424,383 1,545,557 2,969,940 117,527 2004 12/05 40 years

South Padre Island, TX

 —   1,366,721 1,388,764 —   —   1,366,721 1,388,764 2,755,485 105,604 1988 12/05 40 years

Wichita Falls, TX

 —   905,117 1,350,908 —   —   905,117 1,350,908 2,256,025 102,725 2000 12/05 40 years

Wichita Falls, TX

 —   484,202 827,999 —   —   484,202 827,999 1,312,201 62,962 1983 12/05 40 years

Wichita Falls, TX

 —   439,646 751,484 —   —   439,646 751,484 1,191,130 57,144 1984 12/05 40 years

Palm View, TX

 —   835,383 1,372,061 —   —   835,383 1,372,061 2,207,444 75,749 2005 10/06 40 years

Harlingen, TX

 —   638,186 1,806,562 —   —   638,186 1,806,562 2,444,748 92,210 2006 12/06 40 years

Rio Grande City

 —   1,871,354 1,612,282 —   —   1,871,354 1,612,282 3,483,636 82,294 2006 12/06 40 years

San Juan, TX

 —   815,902 1,433,890 —   —   815,902 1,433,890 2,249,792 73,188 2006 12/06 40 years

Zapata, TX

 —   1,332,662 1,772,564 —   —   1,332,662 1,772,564 3,105,226 90,475 2006 12/06 40 years

Orange Grove, TX

 —   1,766,745 1,838,068 —   —   1,766,745 1,838,068 3,604,813 78,501 2007 04/07 40 years

Harlingen, TX

 —   407,920 825,732 —   —   407,920 825,732 1,233,652 30,965 1982 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

 —   467,915 727,548 —   —   467,915 727,548 1,195,463 27,283 1973 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

 —   584,244 958,472 —   —   584,244 958,472 1,542,716 35,943 1981 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

 —   447,733 734,498 —   —   447,733 734,498 1,182,231 27,544 1981 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

 —   698,261 1,168,532 —   —   698,261 1,168,532 1,866,793 43,820 1981 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

 —   348,351 1,168,124 —   —   348,351 1,168,124 1,516,475 43,805 1983 11/07 30 years

San Benito, TX

 —   419,729 1,135,228 —   —   419,729 1,135,228 1,554,957 42,571 1985 11/07 40 years

Del Rio, TX

 —   1,565,013 758,296 —   —   1,565,013 758,296 2,323,309 21,327 1996 11/07 40 years

Kerrville, TX

 —   640,368 1,616,290 —   —   640,368 1,616,290 2,256,658 45,458 1996 11/07 40 years

Monahans, TX

 —   2,627,558 2,973,453 —   —   2,627,558 2,973,453 5,601,011 83,628 1996 11/07 40 years

Odessa, TX

 —   2,632,935 3,198,762 —   —   2,632,935 3,198,762 5,831,697 89,965 2006 11/07 40 years

San Angelo, TX

 —   194,277 471,407 —   —   194,277 471,407 665,684 13,258 1998 11/07 40 years

Pharr, TX

 —   573,354 1,228,572 —   —   573,354 1,228,572 1,801,926 31,994 2000 12/07 40 years

Harlingen, TX

 —   329,308 935,114 —   —   329,308 935,114 1,264,422 29,872 1980 01/08 30 years

Harlingen, TX

 —   277,243 808,006 —   —   277,243 808,006 1,085,248 25,811 1983 01/08 30 years

Laredo, TX

 —   325,343 815,749 —   —   325,343 815,749 1,141,092 26,059 1983 01/08 30 years

McAllen, TX

 —   643,013 1,775,761 —   —   643,013 1,775,761 2,418,774 56,726 1980 01/08 30 years

Port Isabel, TX

 —   298,913 855,463 —   —   298,913 855,463 1,154,375 27,327 1983 01/08 30 years

McAllen, TX

 —   1,269,505 2,382,820 —   —   1,269,505 2,382,820 3,652,325 49,642 1986 05/08 30 years

Brownsville, TX

 —   842,659 1,429,227 —   —   842,659 1,429,227 2,271,887 22,332 2007 05/08 40 years

Edinburg, TX

 —   834,442 1,786,773 —   —   834,442 1,786,773 2,621,216 27,918 2007 05/08 40 years

La Villa, TX

 —   709,657 2,165,800 —   —   709,657 2,165,800 2,875,457 33,841 2007 05/08 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   1,182,620 1,934,163 —   —   1,182,620 1,934,163 3,116,783 30,221 2007 05/08 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   878,610 1,593,457 —   —   878,610 1,593,457 2,472,067 24,898 2007 05/08 40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-17


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
 Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Lubbock, TX

 —   671,357 1,612,297 —   —   671,357 1,612,297 2,283,654 1,679 2007 05/08 40 years

Houston, TX

 —   696,311 1,457,604 —   —   696,311 1,457,604 2,153,915 1,518 2007 05/08 40 years

Subway:

            

Eden Prairie, MN

 —   54,097 150,449 67,341 —   54,097 217,790 271,887 35,928 1997 12/01 40 years

Albany, NY

 —   2,734 66,667 —   —   2,734 66,667 69,401 7,091 1992 09/04 40 years

Cohoes, NY

 —   21,494 115,858 1,125 —   21,494 116,983 138,477 12,441 1994 09/04 40 years

SuperValu:

            

Huntington, WV

 —   1,254,238 760,602 —   —   1,254,238 760,602 2,014,840 225,804 1971 02/97 40 years

Maple Heights, OH

 —   1,034,758 2,874,414 —   —   1,034,758 2,874,414 3,909,172 853,342 1985 02/97 40 years

Susser:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

 —   630,043 3,131,407 —   —   630,043 3,131,407 3,761,450 766,542 1983 03/99 40 years

Swansea Quick Cash:

            

Swansea, IL

 —   45,815 132,365 —   —   45,815 132,365 178,180 23,304 1997 12/01 40 years

Taco Bell:

            

Ocala, FL

 —   275,023 754,990 —   —   275,023 754,990 1,030,013 132,910 2001 12/01 40 years

Ormond Beach, FL

 —   632,337 525,616 —   —   632,337 525,616 1,157,953 92,530 2001 12/01 40 years

Phoenix, AZ

 —   593,718 282,777 —   —   593,718 282,777 876,495 49,781 1995 12/01 40 years

Bedford, IN

 —   796,772 936,942 —   —   796,772 936,942 1,733,714 61,487 1989 05/06 40 years

Columbus, IN

 —   1,256,948 2,054,570 —   —   1,256,948 2,054,570 3,311,518 134,831 1990 05/06 40 years

Columbus, IN

 —   690,142 1,212,681 —   —   690,142 1,212,681 1,902,823 79,582 2005 05/06 40 years

Evansville, IN

 —   221,196 828,023 —   —   221,196 828,023 1,049,219 54,339 2003 05/06 40 years

Evansville, IN

 —   308,068 1,300,511 —   —   308,068 1,300,511 1,608,579 85,346 2000 05/06 40 years

Evansville, IN

 —   524,368 1,815,101 —   —   524,368 1,815,101 2,339,469 119,116 2005 05/06 40 years

Fishers, IN

 —   989,998 486,260 —   —   989,998 486,260 1,476,258 31,911 1998 05/06 40 years

Greensburg, IN

 —   648,296 1,079,007 —   —   648,296 1,079,007 1,727,303 70,810 1998 05/06 40 years

Indianapolis, IN

 —   1,031,743 1,649,975 —   —   1,031,743 1,649,975 2,681,718 108,280 2004 05/06 40 years

Indianapolis, IN

 —   547,218 703,287 —   —   547,218 703,287 1,250,505 46,153 2004 05/06 40 years

Madisonville, KY

 —   682,108 1,192,867 —   —   682,108 1,192,867 1,874,975 78,282 1999 05/06 40 years

Owensboro, KY

 —   638,693 1,326,161 —   —   638,693 1,326,161 1,964,854 87,029 2005 05/06 40 years

Shelbyville, IN

 —   670,216 1,755,847 —   —   670,216 1,755,847 2,426,063 115,227 1998 05/06 40 years

Speedway, IN

 —   407,707 1,426,319 —   —   407,707 1,426,319 1,834,026 93,602 2003 05/06 40 years

Terre Haute, IN

 —   1,037,327 1,655,660 —   —   1,037,327 1,655,660 2,692,987 108,653 2003 05/06 40 years

Terre Haute, IN

 —   1,313,692 2,249,313 —   —   1,313,692 2,249,313 3,563,005 147,611 2003 05/06 40 years

Vincennes, IN

 —   501,783 879,791 —   —   501,783 879,791 1,381,574 57,736 2004 05/06 40 years

Taco Bron Restaurant:

            

Tucson, AZ

 —   827,002 305,209 17,814 —   844,816 305,209 1,150,025 61,550 1974 12/01 40 years

Texas Roadhouse:

            

Grand Junction, CO

 —   584,237 920,143 —   —   584,237 920,143 1,504,380 161,983 1997 12/01 40 years

Thornton, CO

 —   598,556 1,019,164 —   —   598,556 1,019,164 1,617,720 179,415 1998 12/01 40 years

TGI Friday’s:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

 —   1,209,702 1,532,125 —   —   1,209,702 1,532,125 2,741,827 269,718 1995 12/01 40 years

Third Federal Savings:

            

Parma, OH

 —   370,119 238,145 —   —   370,119 238,145 608,264 27,287 1977 09/06 40 years

Thomasville:

            

Buford, GA

 —   1,266,527 2,405,629 —   —   1,266,527 2,405,629 3,672,156 268,127 2004 07/04 40 years

Title Max:

            

Aiken, SC

 —   441,594 645,823 —   —   441,594 645,823 1,087,417 8,073 1989 08/08 30 years

Anniston, AL

 —   160,101 453,482 —   —   160,101 453,482 613,583 4,251 2008 08/08 40 years

Berkeley, MO

 —   236,910 282,086 —   —   236,910 282,086 518,996 5,289 1961 08/08 20 years

Cheraw, SC

 —   88,449 329,695 —   —   88,449 329,695 418,144 4,945 1976 08/08 25 years

Columbia, SC

 —   212,458 319,270 —   —   212,458 319,270 531,728 3,991 1987 08/08 30 years

Dalton, GA

 —   177,737 347,425 —   —   177,737 347,425 525,162 5,211 1972 08/08 25 years

Darlington, SC

 —   46,662 267,271 —   —   46,662 267,271 313,933 4,009 1973 08/08 25 years

Fairfield, AL

 —   132,926 177,599 —   —   132,926 177,599 310,525 2,664 1974 08/08 25 years

Gadsden, AL

 —   250,310 388,736 —   —   250,310 388,736 639,046 3,644 2007 08/08 40 years

Hueytown, AL

 —   135,366 93,054 —   —   135,366 93,054 228,420 3,490 1948 08/08 10 years

Jonesboro, GA

 —   674,768 292,499 —   —   674,768 292,499 967,267 4,388 1970 08/08 25 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-18


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
 Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Lawrenceville, GA

 —   370,179 331,825 —   —   370,179 331,825 702,004 4,148 1986 08/08 30 years

Lewisburg, TN

 —   69,609 297,759 —   —   69,609 297,759 367,367 3,190 1998 08/08 35 years

Macon, GA

 —   102,621 289,909 —   —   102,621 289,909 392,530 5,436 1967 08/08 20 years

Marietta GA

 —   285,365 277,692 —   —   285,365 277,692 563,057 5,207 1967 08/08 20 years

Memphis, TN

 —   111,401 237,019 —   —   111,401 237,019 348,420 2,963 1981 08/08 30 years

Memphis, TN

 —   226,248 444,277 —   —   226,248 444,277 670,525 5,553 1986 08/08 30 years

Montgomery, AL

 —   96,180 233,293 —   —   96,180 233,293 329,472 3,499 1970 08/08 25 years

Nashville, TN

 —   268,122 276,187 —   —   268,122 276,187 544,309 4,143 1978 08/08 25 years

Nashville, TN

 —   255,572 301,169 —   —   255,572 301,169 556,741 3,765 1982 08/08 30 years

Norcross, GA

 —   598,796 349,824 —   —   598,796 349,824 948,620 5,247 1975 08/08 25 years

Pulaski, TN

 —   108,538 360,732 —   —   108,538 360,732 469,270 4,509 1986 08/08 30 years

Riverdale, GA

 —   876,862 400,179 —   —   876,862 400,179 1,277,041 6,003 1978 08/08 25 years

Snellville, GA

 —   564,567 396,384 —   —   564,567 396,384 960,951 5,946 1977 08/08 25 years

Springfield, MO

 —   219,996 400,153 —   —   219,996 400,153 620,149 6,002 1979 08/08 25 years

Springfield, MO

 —   124,643 230,243 —   —   124,643 230,243 354,886 3,454 1979 08/08 25 years

St. Louis, MO

 —   244,040 287,688 —   —   244,040 287,688 531,728 4,315 1971 08/08 25 years

St. Louis, MO

 —   134,018 397,711 —   —   134,018 397,711 531,728 4,261 1993 08/08 35 years

Sylacauga, AL

 —   94,234 191,028 —   —   94,234 191,028 285,262 2,388 1986 08/08 30 years

Taylors, SC

 —   298,652 372,024 —   —   298,652 372,024 670,675 3,986 1999 08/08 35 years

Top’s:

            

Lacey, WA

 —   2,777,449 7,082,150 —   —   2,777,449 7,082,150 9,859,599 2,102,513 1992 02/97 40 years

Tractor Supply Co.:

            

Aransas Pass, TX

 —   100,967 1,599,293 —   —   100,967 1,599,293 1,700,260 345,394 1983 03/99 40 years

Ultra Car Wash:

            

Mobile, AL

 —   1,070,724 1,086,104 —   —   1,070,724 1,086,104 2,156,828 37,335 2005 08/07 40 years

Liburn, GA

 —   1,395,676 1,119,141 —   —   1,395,676 1,119,141 2,514,817 17,487 2004 05/08 40 years

Uni-Mart:

            

Avis, PA

 —   391,801 326,046 —   —   391,801 326,046 717,847 55,020 1976 08/05 20 years

Bear Creek, PA (r)

 —   190,558 230,193 —   —   190,558 230,193 420,752 38,845 1980 08/05 20 years

Bloomsburg, PA (r)

 —   206,402 501,424 —   —   206,402 501,424 707,826 84,615 1981 08/05 20 years

Bloomsburg, PA (r)

 —   515,108 888,074 —   —   515,108 888,074 1,403,182 149,862 1998 08/05 20 years

Chambersburg, PA (r)

 —   75,678 197,035 —   —   75,678 197,035 272,713 33,250 1990 08/05 20 years

Coraopolis, PA

 —   475,572 347,360 —   —   475,572 347,360 822,932 58,617 1983 08/05 20 years

Dallas, PA (r)

 —   890,855 1,435,745 —   —   890,855 1,435,745 2,326,601 242,282 1995 08/05 20 years

East Brady, PA (r)

 —   269,433 583,204 —   —   269,433 583,204 852,637 98,416 1987 08/05 20 years

Hazleton, PA (r)

 —   670,271 377,355 —   —   670,271 377,355 1,047,625 63,679 1974 08/05 20 years

Hazleton, PA (r)

 —   2,529,165 727,550 —   —   2,529,165 727,550 3,256,716 122,774 2001 08/05 20 years

Johnsonburg, PA (r)

 —   780,536 503,662 —   —   780,536 503,662 1,284,198 84,993 1978 08/05 20 years

Larksville, PA (r)

 —   245,870 333,875 —   —   245,870 333,875 579,745 56,341 1990 08/05 20 years

Moosic, PA (r)

 —   323,126 308,844 —   —   323,126 308,844 631,970 52,117 1980 08/05 20 years

Pleasant Gap, PA (r)

 —   331,885 592,844 —   —   331,885 592,844 924,730 100,042 1996 08/05 20 years

Port Vue, PA (r)

 —   824,158 117,629 —   —   824,158 117,629 941,787 19,850 1953 08/05 20 years

Punxsutawney, PA (r)

 —   252,648 541,842 —   —   252,648 541,842 794,490 91,436 1983 08/05 20 years

Ridgway, PA

 —   382,341 258,740 —   —   382,341 258,740 641,081 43,662 1975 08/05 20 years

Shamokin, PA (r)

 —   323,994 506,335 —   —   323,994 506,335 830,329 85,444 1956 08/05 20 years

Shippensburg, PA (r)

 —   203,610 330,098 —   —   203,610 330,098 533,708 55,704 1989 08/05 20 years

St. Clair, PA

 —   212,150 475,086 —   —   212,150 475,086 687,236 80,171 1984 08/05 20 years

Taylor, PA (r)

 —   180,533 526,884 —   —   180,533 526,884 707,417 88,912 1973 08/05 20 years

White Haven, PA (r)

 —   485,984 866,602 —   —   485,984 866,602 1,352,587 146,239 1990 08/05 20 years

Wilkes-Barre, PA (r)

 —   178,104 471,437 —   —   178,104 471,437 649,541 79,555 1989 08/05 20 years

Wilkes-Barre, PA (r)

 —   171,040 422,438 —   —   171,040 422,438 593,478 71,286 1999 08/05 20 years

Wilkes-Barre, PA (r)

 —   875,774 1,956,613 —   —   875,774 1,956,613 2,832,386 330,178 1998 08/05 20 years

Williamsport, PA (r)

 —   908,758 122,164 —   —   908,758 122,164 1,030,922 20,615 1950 08/05 20 years

Ashland, PA (r)

 —   355,322 545,140 —   —   355,322 545,140 900,462 89,721 1977 09/05 20 years

Bear Creek, PA (r)

 —   689,374 274,920 —   —   689,374 274,920 964,294 45,247 1980 09/05 20 years

Mountaintop, PA (r)

 —   422,770 616,488 —   —   422,770 616,488 1,039,259 101,464 1987 09/05 20 years

Beech Creek, PA

 —   476,516 612,664 —   —   476,516 612,664 1,089,180 45,312 1988 01/06 40 years

Canisteo, NY

 —   141,912 485,183 —   —   141,912 485,183 627,095 35,883 1983 01/06 40 years

Curwensville, PA (r)

 —   226,015 607,989 —   —   226,015 607,989 834,004 44,966 1983 01/06 40 years

Dansville, PA (r)

 —   179,736 359,203 —   —   179,736 359,203 538,939 26,566 1988 01/06 40 years

Effort, PA (r)

 —   1,297,431 1,201,954 —   —   1,297,431 1,201,954 2,499,385 88,895 2000 01/06 40 years

Ellwood City, PA

 —   196,089 526,155 —   —   196,089 526,155 722,244 38,914 1987 01/06 40 years

Export, PA (r)

 —   221,840 214,852 —   —   221,840 214,852 436,692 15,890 1988 01/06 40 years

Hastings, PA

 —   199,089 455,379 —   —   199,089 455,379 654,468 33,679 1989 01/06 40 years

Howard, PA

 —   136,416 374,695 —   —   136,416 374,695 511,111 27,712 1987 01/06 40 years

Hughesville, PA (r)

 —   290,136 566,229 —   —   290,136 566,229 856,365 41,877 1977 01/06 40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-19


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Con-
struction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Jersey Shore, PA (r)

 —    514,708 381,372 —   —   514,708 381,372 896,080 28,206  1960  01/06  40 years 

Leeper, PA

 —    285,510 643,886 —   —   285,510 643,886 929,396 47,621  1987  01/06  40 years 

Lewisberry, PA

 —    412,356 533,848 —   —   412,356 533,848 946,204 39,482  1988  01/06  40 years 

McSherrytown, PA (r)

 —    134,501 364,946 —   —   134,501 364,946 499,447 26,991  1988  01/06  40 years 

Mercersburg, PA

 —    672,259 746,309 —   —   672,259 746,309 1,418,568 55,196  1988  01/06  40 years 

Milesburg, PA (r)

 —    133,831 372,913 —   —   133,831 372,913 506,744 27,580  1987  01/06  40 years 

Minersville, PA (r)

 —    679,595 581,718 —   —   679,595 581,718 1,261,313 43,023  1974  01/06  40 years 

Montoursville, PA (r)

 —    158,346 415,372 —   —   158,346 415,372 573,718 30,720  1988  01/06  40 years 

Nanticoke, PA (r)

 —    174,583 482,239 —   —   174,583 482,239 656,822 35,666  1988  01/06  40 years 

New Florence, PA

 —    298,364 812,449 —   —   298,364 812,449 1,110,813 60,087  1989  01/06  40 years 

Newstead, NY

 —    254,635 835,411 —   —   254,635 835,411 1,090,046 61,786  1990  01/06  40 years 

Nuangola, PA (r)

 —    1,062,388 1,202,832 —   —   1,062,388 1,202,832 2,265,220 88,959  2000  01/06  40 years 

Phillipsburg, PA

 —    428,193 268,962 —   —   428,193 268,962 697,155 19,892  1978  01/06  40 years 

Pittsburgh, PA (r)

 —    905,332 1,346,177 —   —   905,332 1,346,177 2,251,509 99,561  1967  01/06  40 years 

Plainfield, PA (r)

 —    243,945 382,518 —   —   243,945 382,518 626,463 28,290  1988  01/06  40 years 

Plains, PA (r)

 —    204,417 401,264 —   —   204,417 401,264 605,681 29,677  1994  01/06  40 years 

Punxsutawney, PA (r)

 —    293,717 649,800 —   —   293,717 649,800 943,517 48,058  1983  01/06  40 years 

Reynoldsville, PA

 —    113,312 327,933 —   —   113,312 327,933 441,245 24,253  1983  01/06  40 years 

Warriors Mark, PA (r)

 —    148,499 404,981 —   —   148,499 404,981 553,480 29,952  1995  01/06  40 years 

Williamsport, PA (r)

 —    295,036 378,715 —   —   295,036 378,715 673,751 28,009  1988  01/06  40 years 

United Rentals:

            

Carrollton, TX

 —    477,893 534,807 —   —   477,893 534,807 1,012,700 54,038  1981  12/04  40 years 

Cedar Park, TX

 —    535,091 829,241 —   —   535,091 829,241 1,364,332 83,788  1990  12/04  40 years 

Clearwater, FL

 —    1,173,292 1,810,665 —   —   1,173,292 1,810,665 2,983,957 182,953  2001  12/04  40 years 

Fort Collins, CO

 —    2,057,322 977,971 —   —   2,057,322 977,971 3,035,293 98,816  1975  12/04  40 years 

Irving, TX

 —    708,389 910,786 —   —   708,389 910,786 1,619,175 92,027  1984  12/04  40 years 

La Porte, TX

 —    1,114,553 2,125,426 —   —   1,114,553 2,125,426 3,239,979 214,757  2000  12/04  40 years 

Littleton, CO

 —    1,743,092 1,943,650 —   —   1,743,092 1,943,650 3,686,742 196,390  2002  12/04  40 years 

Oklahoma City, OK

 —    744,145 1,264,885 —   —   744,145 1,264,885 2,009,030 127,806  1997  12/04  40 years 

Perrysberg, OH

 —    641,867 1,119,085 —   —   641,867 1,119,085 1,760,952 113,074  1979  12/04  40 years 

Plano, TX

 —    1,030,426 1,148,065 —   —   1,030,426 1,148,065 2,178,491 116,002  1996  12/04  40 years 

Temple, TX

 —    1,159,775 1,360,379 —   —   1,159,775 1,360,379 2,520,154 137,455  1998  12/04  40 years 

Ft. Worth, TX

 —    510,490 1,127,796 —   —   510,490 1,127,796 1,638,286 111,605  1997  01/05  40 years 

Ft. Worth, TX

 —    1,427,764 —   —   —   1,427,764 —   1,427,764 (i) (i) 01/05  (i)

Melbourne, FL

 —    746,558 607,128 —   —   746,558 607,128 1,353,686 55,021  1970  05/05  40 years 

United Trust Bank:

            

Bridgeview, IL

 —    673,238 744,154 —   —   673,238 744,154 1,417,392 131,002  1997  12/01  40 years 

Vacant Land:

            

Longwood, FL

 —    585,152 —   —   —   585,152 —   585,152 (e) (e) 03/06  (e)

Florence, AL

 —    1,031,559 —   —   —   1,031,559 —   1,031,559 (e) (e) 06/04  (e)

Vacant Property:

            

Altamonte Springs, FL

 —    1,088,282 924,425 —   —   1,088,282 924,425 2,012,707 162,737  1979  12/01  40 years 

Aransas Pass, TX

 —    89,537 1,240,882 —   —   89,537 1,240,882 1,330,419 306,524  1983  03/99  40 years 

Bellingham, WA

 —    1,236,837 1,259,807 —   —   1,236,837 1,259,807 2,496,644 22,746  1994  06/08  30 years 

Cohoes, NY

 —    51,049 275,163 2,672 —   51,049 277,835 328,884 29,548  1994  09/04  40 years 

Cohoes, NY

 —    26,868 144,823 1,407 —   26,868 146,230 173,098 15,551  1994  09/04  40 years 

Corpus Christi, TX

 —    893,270 978,344 76,664 —   893,270 1,055,008 1,948,278 398,536  1967  11/93  40 years 

Depew, NY

 —    689,040 386,251 —   —   689,040 386,251 1,075,291 67,996  1994  09/04  40 years 

East Palo Alto, CA

 —    2,271,634 3,404,843 —   —   2,271,634 3,404,843 5,676,477 833,477  1998  12/98(f) 40 years 

Everett, PA

 —    226,366 1,159,833 7,830 —   226,366 817,667 1,044,033 170,333  1998  11/98  40 years 

Florissant, MO

 —    2,490,210 2,937,449 —   —   2,490,210 2,937,449 5,427,659 419,198  1996  04/03  40 years 

Foothill Ranch, CA

 —    1,456,113 2,505,022 —   —   1,456,113 2,505,022 3,961,135 751,843  1995  12/96  40 years 

Houston, TX

 —    421,897 1,915,483 —   —   421,897 1,915,483 2,337,380 145,340  1995  12/05  40 years 

Houston, TX

 —    112,150 509,179 —   —   112,150 509,179 621,329 39,034  1995  12/05  40 years 

Indianapolis, IN

 —    639,584 1,106,911 —   —   639,584 1,106,911 1,746,495 182,923  1996  12/01  40 years 

Jacksonville, FL

 —    986,565 855,523 —   —   986,565 855,523 1,842,088 150,608  1994  09/04  40 years 

Lapeer, MI

 —    187,335 1,353,264 —   —   187,335 1,353,264 1,540,599 46,518  2007  10/07  40 years 

Lebanon, TN

 —    581,612 —   2,062,738 —   581,612 2,062,738 2,644,350 45,122  2007  03/07(q) 40 years 

Mesa, AZ

 —    152,609 399,801 112,765 —   152,609 512,566 665,175 70,774  1997  12/01  40 years 

Milford, CT

 —    921,200 697,298 —   —   921,200 697,298 1,618,498 122,753  1994  09/04  40 years 

Montgomery, AL

 —    592,730 1,186,705 —   —   592,730 1,186,705 1,779,435 90,239  1998  12/05  40 years 

Montgomery, AL

 —    1,418,158 1,140,080 —   —   1,418,158 1,044,076 2,462,234 191,894  1999  12/01  40 years 

Olean, NY

 —    40,453 259,286 —   —   40,453 259,286 299,739 43,755  1990  08/05  40 years 

Orlando, FL

 53,280(o) 36,850 101,320 —   —   36,850 101,320 138,170 12,348  2001  02/04  40 years 

Ridgeland, MS

 —    778,874 933,313 —   —   778,874 933,313 1,712,187 70,971  1997  08/06  40 years 

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-20


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Con-
struction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land  Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land  Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Sarasota, FL

 —   1,167,618  1,903,810 218,564 —   1,167,618  2,122,374 3,289,992 262,103  1996  09/97  40 years 

Sarasota, FL

 —   470,600  1,343,746 —   —   470,600  1,343,746 1,814,346 174,967  1983  03/99  40 years 

Schaumburg, IL

 —   2,064,964  1,311,190 —   —   2,064,964  1,311,190 3,376,154 230,824  1998  12/01  40 years 

Sealy, TX

 —   873,758  964,185 —   —   873,758  964,185 1,837,944 236,025  1982  03/99  40 years 

Sherman, TX

 —   232,670  126,149 —   —   232,670  126,149 358,819 14,455  1969  09/06  20 years 

Southfield, MI

 —   405,107  643,759 —   —   405,107  643,759 1,048,866 130,301  1976  12/01  40 years 

Summerville, PA

 —   92,798  271,832 —   —   92,798  271,832 364,630 20,104  1988  01/06  40 years 

Swansea, IL

 —   91,709  264,956 —   —   91,709  264,956 356,665 46,686  1997  12/01  40 years 

Ticonderoga, NY

 —   88,867  688,622 —   —   88,867  688,622 777,489 73,883  1993  09/04  40 years 

Tulsa, OK

 —   324,751  313,897 —   —   324,751  313,897 638,648 35,967  1978  09/06  20 years 

Wichita Falls, TX

 —   818,611  1,107,418 —   —   818,611  1,107,418 1,926,029 194,952  1982  12/01  40 years 

Woodstock, GA

 —   1,937,017  1,284,901 —   —   1,890,769  1,284,901 3,175,670 180,689  1997  05/03  40 years 

Yeagertown, PA

 —   142,061  180,073 —   —   142,061  180,073 322,134 30,387  1977  08/05  20 years 

Value City Furniture:

            

White Marsh, MD

 —   3,762,030  —   3,006,391 —   3,762,030  3,006,391 6,768,421 811,099  1998  03/98(g) 40 years 

Walgreens:

            

Sunrise, FL

 —   1,957,974  1,400,970 —   —   1,957,974  1,400,970 3,358,944 197,011  1994  05/03  40 years 

Tulsa, OK

 —   1,193,187  3,055,724 —   —   1,193,187  3,055,724 4,248,911 270,559  2003  06/05  40 years 

Wal-Mart:

            

Beeville, TX

 —   507,231  2,315,424 —   —   507,231  752,566 1,259,797 564,644  1983  03/99  40 years 

Winfield, AL

 —   419,811  1,684,505 —   —   419,811  1,684,505 2,104,316 412,353  1983  03/99  40 years 

Washington Bike Center:

            

Fairfax, VA

 —   192,830  278,892 83,773 —   192,830  362,665 555,495 42,273  1995  12/95  40 years 

Wendy’s Old Fashioned

            

Hamburger:

            

Sacramento, CA

 —   585,872  —   —   —   585,872  —   585,872 (i) (i) 02/98  (i)

New Kensington, PA

 —   501,136  333,445 —   —   501,136  333,445 834,581 58,700  1980  12/01  40 years 

Whataburger:

            

Albuquerque, NM

 —   624,318  418,975 —   —   624,318  418,975 1,043,293 73,757  1995  12/01  40 years 

Brunswick, GA

 —   290,860  —   910,051 —   290,860  910,051 1,200,911 38,867  2007  12/06(q) 40 years 

Jacksonville, FL

 —   823,643  934,191 —   —   823,643  934,191 1,757,834 45,736  2006  01/07  40 years 

Starke, FL

 —   476,055  981,779 —   —   476,055  981,779 1,457,834 48,066  2006  01/07  40 years 

Yulee, FL

 —   893,834  1,013,995 —   —   893,834  1,013,995 1,907,829 49,644  2006  01/07  40 years 

Wherehouse Music:

            

Homewood, AL

 —   1,031,974  696,950 —   —   1,031,974  696,950 1,728,924 122,692  1997  12/01  40 years 

Independence, MO

 —   502,623  1,209,307 —   —   502,623  1,209,307 1,711,930 91,958  1994  12/05  40 years 

Whitewater:

            

Bakersfield, CA

 —   3,303,206  3,845,238 —   —   3,303,206  3,845,238 7,148,444 120,862  1975  03/08  40 years 

Bakersfield, CA

 —   2,564,277  4,464,522 —   —   2,564,277  4,464,522 7,028,799 115,175  1988  03/08  40 years 

Bakersfield, CA

 —   2,043,496  3,519,882 —   —   2,043,496  3,519,882 5,563,378 90,835  1988  03/08  40 years 

Bakersfield, CA

 —   2,099,042  2,011,371 —   —   2,099,042  2,011,371 4,110,413 45,600  1990  03/08  40 years 

Bakersfield, CA

 —   3,345,544  6,015,876 —   —   3,345,544  6,015,876 9,361,420 132,894  1998  03/08  40 years 

Bakersfield, CA

 —   3,363,490  3,288,348 —   —   3,363,490  3,288,348 6,651,838 83,905  2002  03/08  40 years 

Bakersfield, CA

 —   3,663,779  3,709,494 —   —   3,663,779  3,709,494 7,373,273 65,160  1994  03/08  40 years 

Bakersfield, CA

 —   2,797,633  5,260,066 —   —   2,797,633  5,260,066 8,057,699 118,978  1997  03/08  40 years 

Bakersfield, CA

 —   1,643,206  1,958,737 —   —   1,643,206  1,958,737 3,601,943 62,027  1975  03/08  40 years 

San Fernando

 —   6,630,160  2,706,309 —   —   6,630,160  2,706,309 9,336,469 76,866  1988  03/08  40 years 

Ventura, CA

 —   6,252,505  4,560,481 —   —   6,252,505  4,560,481 10,812,986 105,168  1994  03/08  40 years 

Ventura, CA

 —   5,590,461  4,431,373 —   —   5,590,461  4,431,373 10,021,834 88,912  2001  03/08  40 years 

Wingfoot:

            

Beaverdam, OH

 —   (l) 1,521,190 —   —   (l) 1,521,190 1,521,190 61,798  2004  05/07  40 years 

Benton, AR

 —   (l) 308,519 —   —   (l) 308,519 308,519 11,248  2001  05/07  40 years 

Bowman, SC

 —   (l) 969,274 —   —   (l) 969,274 969,274 45,002  1998  05/07  40 years 

Brunswick, GA

 —   (l) 1,450,274 —   —   (l) 1,450,274 1,450,274 58,917  2003  05/07  40 years 

Dalton, GA

 —   (l) 1,540,648 —   —   (l) 1,540,648 1,540,648 62,534  2004  05/07  40 years 

Dandrige, TN

 —   (l) 1,030,351 —   —   (l) 1,030,351 1,030,351 47,838  1989  05/07  35 years 

Franklin, OH

 —   (l) 562,698 —   —   (l) 562,698 562,698 26,125  1998  05/07  40 years 

Gary, IN

 —   (l) 1,486,297 —   —   (l) 1,486,297 1,486,297 60,381  2004  05/07  40 years 

Georgetown, KY

 —   (l) 678,799 —   —   (l) 678,799 678,799 36,768  1997  05/07  40 years 

Mebane, NC

 —   (l) 561,025 —   —   (l) 561,025 561,025 26,048  1998  05/07  35 years 

Piedmont, SC

 —   (l) 566,582 —   —   (l) 566,582 566,582 26,306  1999  05/07  35 years 

Port Wentworth, GA

 —   (l) 551,919 —   —   (l) 551,919 551,919 25,625  1998  05/07  35 years 

Valdosta, GA

 —   (l) 1,476,879 —   —   (l) 1,476,879 1,476,879 59,998  2004  05/07  40 years 

Whiteland, IN

 —   (l) 1,471,230 —   —   (l) 1,471,230 1,471,230 53,639  2004  07/07  40 years 

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-21


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
  Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Con-
struction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land  Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land  Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
  Total     

Des Moines, IA

  —    (l)  816,275  —    —    (l)  816,275   816,275   29,760  1987 07/07  40 years 

Evansville, IN

  —    (l)  575,761  —    —    (l)  575,761   575,761   20,991  2002 07/07  40 years 

Kearney, MO

  —    (l)  1,268,709  —    —    (l)  1,268,709   1,268,709   46,255  2003 07/07  40 years 

Temple, GA

  —    (l)  1,065,007  —    —    (l)  1,065,007   1,065,007   29,953  2007 01/08  40 years 

Robinson, TX

  —    (l)  1,182,537  —    —    (l)  1,182,537   1,182,537   33,259  2007 07/07  40 years 

Oklahoma City, OK

  —    (l)  1,246,773  —    —    (l)  1,246,773   1,246,773   27,273  2008 08/07  40 years 

Amarillo, TX

  —    (l)  1,158,416  —    —    (l)  1,158,416   1,158,416   15,687  2008 02/08  40 years 

Jackson, MS

  —    (l)  1,287,640  —    —    (l)  1,287,640   1,287,640   14,754  2008 03/08  40 years 

Glendale, KY

  —    (l)  1,066,052  —    —    (l)  1,066,052   1,066,052   5,552  2008 07/08  40 years 

Winn-Dixie:

            

Columbus, GA

  —    1,023,371   1,874,875  —    —    1,023,371   1,874,875   2,898,246   255,842  1984 07/03  40 years 

Ziebart:

            

Maplewood, MN

  —    307,846   311,313  —    —    307,846   311,313   619,159   30,158  1990 02/05  40 years 

Middleburg Heights, OH

  —    199,234   148,106  —    —    199,234   148,106   347,340   14,502  1961 02/05  40 years 

Zio’s Restaurant:

            

Aurora, CO

  —    1,168,457   1,104,345  —    —    1,168,457   1,104,345   2,272,802   131,445  2000 06/05  30 years 

Leasehold Interests:

  —    2,532,133   —    —    —    2,532,133   —     2,532,133   1,758,765  —   (n) (m)
                                   
 $25,343,962 $1,060,307,095  $1,305,849,831 $100,557,487 $—   $1,060,289,057  $1,403,115,369  $2,463,404,426  $146,295,914    
                                   

Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Direct Financing Leases:

            

Bames and Noble:

            

Plantation, FL

  —    —     3,498,405  —    —    —     (c)  (c)  (c) 1996 05/95  (c)

Borders Books & Music:

            

Altamonte Springs, FL

  —    —     3,267,400  —    —    —     (c)  (c)  (c) 1997 09/97  (c)

Checkers:

            

Orlando, FL

  —    —     286,910  —    —    —     (c)  (c)  (c) 1988 07/92  (c)

CVS:

            

San Antonio, TX

  —    —     783,974  —    —    —     (c)  (c)  (c) 1993 12/93  (c)

Amarillo, TX

  —    158,851   855,348  —    —    (d)  (d)  (d)  (d) 1994 12/94  (d)

Lafayette, LA

  —    —     949,128  —    —    —     (c)  (c)  (c) 1995 01/96  (c)

Oklahoma City, OK

  —    (l)  1,365,125  —    —    (l)  (c)  (c)  (c) 1997 06/97  (c)

Oklahoma City, OK

  —    (l)  1,419,093  —    —    (l)  (c)  (c)  (c) 1997 06/97  (c)

Denny’s:

            

Stockton, CA

  —    939,974   508,573  —    —    (d)  (d)  (d)  (d) 1982 09/06  (d)

Food 4 Less:

            

Chula Vista, CA

  —    —     4,266,421  —    —    —     (c)  (c)  (c) 1995 11/98  (c)

Heilig-Meyers:

            

Marlow Heights, MD

  —    415,926   1,397,178  —    —    (d)  (d)  (d)  (d) 1968 11/98  (d)

York, PA

  —    279,312   1,109,609  —    —    (d)  (d)  (d)  (d) 1997 11/98  (d)

Jared Jewelers:

            

Glendale, AZ

  —    (l)  1,599,288  —    —    (l)  (c)  (c)  (c) 1998 12/01  (c)

Lewisville, TX

  213,849  (l)  1,502,903  —    —    (l)  (c)  (c)  (c) 1998 12/01  (c)

Oviedo, FL

  417,822  (l)  1,500,145  —    —    (l)  (c)  (c)  (c) 1998 12/01  (c)

Phoenix, AZ

  314,862  (l)  1,241,827  —    —    (l)  (c)  (c)  (c) 1998 12/01  (c)

Toledo, OH

  —    (l)  1,457,625  —    —    (l)  (c)  (c)  (c) 1998 12/01  (c)

Kash N’ Karry:

            

Valrico, FL

  —    1,234,519   3,255,257  —    —    (d)  (d)  (d)  (d) 1997 06/02  (d)

Rite Aid:

            

Kennett Square, PA

  —    (l)  —    1,984,435  —    (l)  (c)  (c)  (c) 2000 12/00  (c)

Arlington, VA

  —    —     3,201,489  —    —    —     (c)  (c)  (c) 2002 02/02  (c)
                                   
 $946,533 $3,028,583  $33,465,698 $1,984,435 $—   $—    $—    $—    $—      
                                   

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-22


Table of Contents
  Encum-
brances (k)
 Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Con-
struction
  Date
Acquired
 Life on
Which
Depreciation
and
Amortization
in Latest
Income

Statement is
Computed
 
   Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Improve-
ments
 Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improve-

ments and
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Real Estate Held for Sale the Company has Invested in:

            

AJ Petroleum:

            

Hollywood, FL

  —    417,487  184,170  —    —    417,487  184,170  601,657  —    1961  12/05 —   

Express Mart:

            

Mechanicsburg, PA

  —    72,383  214,738  —    —    72,383  214,738  287,121  —    1972  07/06 —   

Fuel-On:

            

Kane, PA

   156,967  913,017  —    —    156,967  329,187  486,154  —    1984  08/05 —   

Houtzdale, PA

   311,707  729,052  —    —    311,707  79,062  390,769  —    1977  01/06 —   

Mik Cleaners:

            

Woodstock, GA

  —    20,857  56,050  —    —    20,857  56,050  76,907  —    1997  07/08 —   

Nitlantika:

            

Hollywood, FL

  —    645,533  313,657  —    —    645,533  313,657  959,190  —    1960  12/05 —   

Pep Boys:

            

Guayama, PR

  —    1,729,000  2,731,785  —    —    1,729,000  2,731,785  4,460,785  —    1998  11/07 —   

Reading, PA

  —    1,188,532  3,366,975  —    —    1,188,532  3,366,975  4,555,507  —    1989  11/07 —   

Power Center:

            

Big Flats, NY

  —    2,248,422  7,159,309  —    —    2,248,422  5,291,498  7,539,920  —    2006  08/05 —   

Midland, MI

  —    1,085,180  1,634,602  —    —    1,085,180  1,634,602  2,719,782  —    2005  05/05 —   

Topsham, ME

  —    1,884,772  1,734,694  —    —    1,884,772  61,548  1,946,320  —    2007  02/06 —   

Irving, TX

  —    950,616  1,089,869  —    —    950,616  1,089,869  2,040,485  —    2008  02/06 —   

Waxahachie, TX

  —    1,249,351  1,096,646  —    —    1,249,351  1,096,646  2,345,997  —    2008  02/06 —   

Harlingen, TX

  —    247,376  807,079  —    —    247,376  807,079  1,054,455  —    2008  04/08 —   

Harlingen, TX

  —    748,886  1,237,507  —    —    748,886  1,237,507  1,986,393  —    2008  04/08 —   

Rockwall, TX

  —    8,958,882  28,803,250  —    —    8,958,882  28,803,250  37,762,132  —    2007  02/06 —   

Salon 140:

            

Woodstock, GA

  —    15,642  42,037  —    —    15,642  42,037  57,679  —    1997  07/08 —   

Sal’s Pizza:

            

Mechanicsburg, PA

  —    48,256  143,158  —    —    48,256  143,158  191,414  —    1972  07/06 —   

Starbuck’s:

            

Harlingen, TX

  —    285,930  369,305  —    —    285,930  369,305  655,235  —    1987  02/08 —   

Tutor Time:

            

Elk Grove, CA

  —    1,157,709  —    —    —    1,157,709  —    1,157,709  (e) (e) 09/08 (e)

Uni-Mart:

            

Bradford, PA

  —    184,231  761,512  —    —    184,231  761,512  945,743  —    1983  08/05 —   

Midway, PA

  —    310,893  708,427  —    —    310,893  708,427  1,019,320  —    1990  01/06 —   

Clairton, PA

  —    215,405  700,821  —    —    215,405  700,821  916,226  —    1986  01/06 —   

Burnham, PA (r)

  —    264,741  510,262  —    —    264,741  510,262  775,003  —    1978  07/06 —   

Port Royal, PA

  —    238,052  635,213  —    —    238,052  635,213  873,265  —    1989  07/06 —   

Vacant Land:

            

Grand Prairie, TX

  —    386,807  —    —    —    386,807  —    386,807  (e) (e) 12/02 (e)

Fairfield Township, OH

  —    3,201,128  —    —    —    3,201,128  —    3,201,128  (e) (e) 08/06 (e)

Bonita Springs, FL

  —    112,000  —    —    —    112,000  —    112,000  (e) (e) 09/06 (e)

Topsham, ME

  —    1,034,215  —    —    —    1,034,215  —    1,034,215  (e) (e) 02/06 (e)

Rockwall, TX

  —    9,359,707  —    —    —    9,359,707  —    9,359,707  (e) (e) 09/06 (e)

Lancaster, OH

  —    1,730,636  —    —    —    1,730,636  —    1,730,636  (e) (e) 01/08 (e)

Hadley, MA

  —    2,048,514  —    —    —    2,048,514  —    2,048,514  (e) (e) 02/08 (e)

Vacant Property:

            

North Richland Hills, TX

  —    583,650  179,509  —    —    583,650  179,509  763,159  —    1989  02/06 —   

Woodstock, GA

  —    190,321  511,452  —    —    190,321  511,452  701,773  —    1997  07/08 —   

Walgreens:

            

Beavercreek, OH

  —    1,614,113  2,755,284  —    —    1,614,113  2,755,284  4,369,397  —    2008  10/07 —   

Yen Ching Restaurant:

            

Woodstock, GA

  —    33,893  91,080  —    —    33,893  91,080  124,973  —    1997  07/08 —   
                               
 $—   $44,931,794 $59,480,460 $—   $—   $44,931,794 $54,705,683 $99,637,477 $—      
                               

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-23


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND

ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

December 31, 2008

(dollars in thousands)

 

(a)Transactions in real estate and accumulated depreciation during 2008, 2007, and 2006 are summarized as follows:

 

   2008   2007   2006 

Land, buildings, and leasehold interests:

      

Balance at the beginning of year

  $2,415,544   $1,756,514   $1,508,664 

Acquisitions, completed construction and tenant improvements

   410,787    864,116    558,766 

Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests

   (215,542)   (203,403)   (310,223)

Provision for loss on impairment of real estate

   (5,493)   (1,683)   (693)
               

Balance at the close of year

  $2,605,296   $2,415,544   $1,756,514 
               

Accumulated depreciation and amortization:

      

Balance at the beginning of year

  $111,087   $87,359   $79,197 

Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests

   (2,591)   (3,667)   (12,413)

Depreciation and amortization expense

   37,800    27,395    20,575 
               

Balance at the close of year

  $146,296   $111,087   $87,359 
               

 

(b)As of December 31, 2008, the leases are treated as either operating or financing leases for federal income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate cost of the properties owned by the Company that under operating leases were $2,432,304 and financing leases were $9,048.

 

(c)For financial reporting purposes, the portion of the lease relating to the building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.

 

(d)For financial reporting purposes, the lease for the land and building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.

 

(e)The Company owns only the land for this property.

 

(f)Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, the Company purchased the buildings from the tenants upon completion of construction, generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.

 

(g)Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. The Company developed the buildings, generally completing construction within 12 months from the acquisition date of the land.

 

(h)Date acquired represents date of building construction completion. The land has been recorded as operating lease.

 

(i)The Company owns only the land for this property, which is subject to a ground lease between the Company and the tenant. The tenant funded the improvements on the property.

 

(j)In 2005, there was a lease amendment to this property, resulting in a reclassification from a direct financing lease to an operating lease.

 

(k)Encumbered properties for which the portion of the lease relating to the land is accounted for as an operating lease and the portion of the lease relating to the building is accounted for as a direct financing lease, the total amount of the encumbrance is listed with the land portion of the property.

 

(l)The Company owns only the building for this property. The land is subject to a ground lease between the Company and an unrelated third party.

 

(m)The leasehold interests are amortized over the life of the respective leases which range from 12 years to 12.5 years.

 

(n)The leasehold interest sites were acquired between August 1999 and August 2001.

 

(o)Property is encumbered as a part of the Company’s $6,952 long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.

 

(p)Property is encumbered as a part of the Company’s $21,000 long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.

 

(q)Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, the Company funds the tenant’s construction draws, final funding occurs generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.

 

(r)The tenant of this property has subleased the property. The tenant continues to be responsible for complying with all the terms of the lease agreement and is continuing to pay rent on this property to the Company.

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-24


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE

December 31, 2008

(dollars in thousands)

 

Description

  Interest
Rate
  Maturity
Date
  Periodic
Payment
Terms
 Prior
Liens
  Face
Amount
of
Mortgages
  Carrying
Amount of
Mortgages (e)
  Principal
Amount of
Loans
Subject to
Delinquent
Principal
or Interest

First mortgages on properties:

           

National City, CA

  11.500% 2009  (b) —    $2,765  $189  $—  

San Jose, CA

  11.500% 2009  (b) —     2,565   271   —  

Lake Jackson, TX

  9.000% 2009  (d) —     1,875   1,707   —  

Paramus, NJ

  9.000% 2022  (b) —     6,000   5,445   —  

Des Moines, IA

  8.000% 2010  (d) —     400   343   —  

Terre Haute, IN

  7.000% 2011  (c) —     1,582   1,582   —  

Houston, TX

  9.000% 2009  (c) —     3,998   3,998   —  

Lubbock, TX

  8.750% 2009  (c) —     14,000   10,023   —  

Cleveland, OH

  10.000% 2028  (c) —     6,644   5,935   —  

Keystone Heights, FL

  8.000% 2009  (c) —     1,650   1,650   —  

Chattanooga, TN

  8.000% 2009  (c) —     1,600   1,600   —  

Lynchburg, VA

  8.000% 2009  (c) —     1,600   1,600   —  

Martinsburg, WV

  8.000% 2009  (c) —     1,650   1,650   —  
                  
        $46,329  $35,993(a) $—  
                  

 

(a)The following shows the changes in the carrying amounts of mortgage loans during the years:

 

   2008  2007  2006 

Balance at beginning of year

  $49,336  $13,627  $19,418 

New mortgage loans

   17,028(f)  39,088(f)  1,582(f)

Deductions during the year:

    

Collections of principal

   (27,874)  (3,379)  (7,373)

Foreclosures

   (2,497)  —     —   
             

Balance at the close of year

  $35,993  $49,336  $13,627 
             

 

(b)Principal and interest is payable at level amounts over the life of the loan.

 

(c)Interest only payments are due monthly. Principal is due at maturity.

 

(d)Principal and interest is payable at level amounts over the life of the loan with a principal balloon payment at maturity.

 

(e)Mortgages held by NNN and its subsidiaries for federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $35,993, $49,336, and $13,627, respectively.

 

(f)Mortgages totaling $17,028, $39,088, and $1,582 were accepted in connection with real estate transactions for the year ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F-25