NNN REIT
NNN
#2369
Rank
$7.87 B
Marketcap
$41.45
Share price
-0.53%
Change (1 day)
8.94%
Change (1 year)

NNN REIT - 10-K annual report


Text size:
Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

 

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

OR

 

¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from                      to                     .

Commission file number 001-11290

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Maryland 56-1431377

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

450 South Orange Avenue, Suite 900

Orlando, Florida 32801

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (407) 265-7348

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class: Name of exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange
7.375% Series C Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ¨    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  x Accelerated filer  ¨ Non-accelerated filer  ¨ Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨     No  x

The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2009 was $1,371,916,984.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 16, 2010 was 82,916,942.


Table of Contents

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Registrant incorporates by reference into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K portions of National Retail Properties, Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Regulation 14A. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

     PAGE      
REFERENCE
Part I   

Item 1.

 

Business

  2

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

  9

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

  18

Item 2.

 

Properties

  18

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

  18

Item 4.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

  18
Part II   

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

  19

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

  21

Item 7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  23

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  44

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

  45

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

  86

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

  86

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

  88
Part III   

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

  88

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

  88

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

  88

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

  88

Item 14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

  88
Part IV   

Item 15.

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

  89

Signatures

  94


Table of Contents

 

PART I

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the terms “registrant” or “NNN” or the “Company” refer to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

Statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K, including the documents that are incorporated by reference, that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Also, when NNN uses any of the words “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” or similar expressions, NNN is making forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon present expectations and reasonable assumptions, NNN’s actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those NNN anticipates or projects are described in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any document incorporated herein by reference. NNN undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1.  Business

The Company

NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments), and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). The Inventory Assets are operated in the TRS.

Real Estate Assets

NNN acquires, owns, invests in, manages and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). Inventory Assets typically consist of two types of properties, property for development (“Development Properties or Development Portfolio”) and improved properties (“Exchange Properties” or “Exchange Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 1,015 Investment Properties, with an aggregate leasable area of 11,373,000 square feet, located in 44 states. Approximately 96 percent of total properties in NNN’s Investment Portfolio were leased or operated at December 31, 2009. As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 19 Inventory Properties.

Competition

NNN generally competes with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors, including but not limited to, insurance companies, pension funds and financial institutions, that own, manage, finance or develop retail and net leased properties.

 

2


Table of Contents

 

Employees

As of January 31, 2010, NNN employed 57 full-time associates including executive and administrative personnel.

Other Information

NNN’s executive offices are located at 450 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 900, Orlando, Florida 32801, and its telephone number is (407) 265-7348. NNN has an Internet website at www.nnnreit.com where NNN’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) can be downloaded free of charge.

The common shares of National Retail Properties, Inc. are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), under the ticker symbol “NNN.” The depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series C Preferred Stock”), of NNN are traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “NNNPRC.”

Business Strategies and Policies

The following is a discussion of NNN’s operating strategy and certain of its investment, financing and other policies. These strategies and policies have been set by management and/or the Board of Directors and, in general, may be amended or revised from time to time by management and/or the Board of Directors without a vote of NNN’s stockholders.

Operating Strategies

NNN’s strategy is to invest primarily in retail real estate that is typically located along high-traffic commercial corridors near areas of commercial and residential density. Management believes that these types of properties, generally pursuant to triple-net leases, provide attractive opportunities for a stable current return and the potential for increased returns and capital appreciation. Triple-net leases typically require the tenant to pay property operating expenses such as real estate taxes, assessments and other government charges, insurance, utilities, repairs and maintenance and capital expenditures. Initial lease terms are generally 15 to 20 years.

In some cases, NNN’s investment in real estate is in the form of mortgages, structured finance investments or other loans which may be secured by real estate, a borrower’s pledge of ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets. These investments may be subordinated to senior loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans.

NNN holds investment real estate assets until it determines that the sale of such a property is advantageous in view of NNN’s investment objectives. In deciding whether to sell a real estate investment asset, NNN may consider factors such as potential capital appreciation, net cash flow, tenant credit quality, market lease rates, potential use of sale proceeds and federal income tax considerations.

NNN acquires and/or develops inventory real estate assets primarily for the purpose of resale.

NNN’s management team considers certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN may include items such as: the composition of NNN’s Investment Portfolio (including but not limited to tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of NNN’s Investment Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios, profitability measures, industry trends and performance of competitors compared to that of NNN.

The operating strategies employed by NNN have allowed it to increase the annual dividend (paid quarterly) per common share for 20 consecutive years.

 

3


Table of Contents

 

Investment in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate

NNN’s management believes that single tenant, freestanding net lease retail properties will continue to be attractive investment opportunities and that NNN is well suited to take advantage of these opportunities because of its experience in accessing capital markets, ability to underwrite and acquire properties, and because of management’s experience in seeking out, identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions.

In evaluating a particular acquisition, management may consider a variety of factors, including:

 

  

the location, visibility and accessibility of the property,

 

  

the geographic area and demographic characteristics of the community, as well as the local real estate market, including potential for growth, market rents, and existing or potential competing properties or retailers,

 

  

the size of the property,

 

  

the purchase price,

 

  

the non-financial terms of the proposed acquisition,

 

  

the availability of funds or other consideration for the proposed acquisition and the cost thereof,

 

  

the compatibility of the property with NNN’s existing portfolio,

 

  

the potential for, and current extent of, any environmental problems,

 

  

the quality of construction and design and the current physical condition of the property,

 

  

the financial and other characteristics of the existing tenant,

 

  

the tenant’s business plan, operating history and management team,

 

  

the tenant’s industry,

 

  

the terms of any existing leases, and

 

  

the rent to be paid by the tenant.

NNN intends to engage in future investment activities in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of its status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and that will not make NNN an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Equity investments in acquired properties may be subject to existing mortgage financings and other indebtedness or to new indebtedness which may be incurred in connection with acquiring or refinancing these investments.

Investments in Real Estate Mortgages, Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, and Securities of or Interests in Persons Engaged in Real Estate Activities

While NNN’s primary business objectives and Investment Properties emphasize retail properties, NNN may invest in (i) a wide variety of property types and tenant types, (ii) leases, mortgages, commercial mortgage residual interests and other types of real estate interests, (iii) loans secured by personal property, (iv) loans secured by membership interests, or (v) securities of other REITs, other entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities. For example, NNN from time to time has made investments in mortgage loans or held mortgages on properties that NNN has sold and has made structured finance investments and other loans related to properties acquired or sold.

 

4


Table of Contents

 

Financing Strategy

NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategies while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to its stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.

NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional retail properties with cash from its $400,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). As of December 31, 2009, no balance was outstanding and $400,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $653,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN’s ratio of total liabilities to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation) was approximately 37 percent and the secured indebtedness to total gross assets was approximately one percent. The total debt to total market capitalization was approximately 36 percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances.

NNN anticipates it will be able to obtain additional financing for short-term and long-term liquidity requirements as further described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity.” However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.

The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy at any time. NNN has not engaged in trading, underwriting or agency distribution or sale of securities of other issuers and does not intend to do so.

Strategies and Policy Changes

Any of NNN’s strategies or policies described above may be changed at any time by NNN without notice to or a vote of NNN’s stockholders.

Investment Properties

As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 1,015 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 11,373,000 square feet, located in 44 states. Approximately 96 percent of the Investment Properties were leased at December 31, 2009.

The following table summarizes NNN’s Investment Properties as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):

 

   Size(1)  Acquisition Cost(2)
  High  Low  Average  High  Low  Average

Land

  2,223  7  109  $8,882  $25  $1,086

Building

  135  1  11   17,049   44   1,520

(1)     Approximate square feet.

(2)     Costs vary depending upon size and local demographic factors.

In connection with the development of two Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction, land costs and tenant improvements) of $14,651,000. As of December 31, 2009, NNN had funded $12,261,000 of this commitment, with $2,390,000 remaining to be funded.

As of December 31, 2009, NNN did not have any tenant that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental income.

 

5


Table of Contents

 

Leases

Although there are variations in the specific terms of the leases, the following is a summary of the general structure of NNN’s leases. Generally, the leases of the Investment Properties provide for initial terms of 15 to 20 years. As of December 31, 2009, the weighted average remaining lease term was approximately 12 years. The Investment Properties are generally leased under net leases pursuant to which the tenant typically will bear responsibility for substantially all property costs and expenses associated with ongoing maintenance and operation, including utilities, property taxes and insurance. In addition, the majority of NNN’s leases provide that the tenant is responsible for roof and structural repairs. The leases of the Investment Properties provide for annual base rental payments (payable in monthly installments) ranging from $8,000 to $1,876,000 (average of $213,000). Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume.

Generally, the Investment Property leases provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions as the initial lease. Some of the leases also provide that in the event NNN wishes to sell the Investment Property subject to that lease, NNN first must offer the lessee the right to purchase the Investment Property on the same terms and conditions as any offer which NNN intends to accept for the sale of the Investment Property.

Certain Investment Properties have leases that provide the tenant with a purchase option to acquire the Investment Property from NNN. The purchase price calculations are generally stated in the lease agreement or are based on the current market value at the time of exercise.

The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of NNN’s Investment Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of December 31, 2009:

 

     % of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
   # of
Properties
    Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
         % of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
   # of
Properties
    Gross
Leasable
Area(2)

2010        

    2.3  36    408,000    2016    1.7  13    240,000

2011        

    2.1  21    389,000    2017    4.3  27    676,000

2012        

    3.3  34    484,000    2018    2.9  24    345,000

2013        

    4.7  39    849,000    2019    4.3  42    632,000

2014        

    5.0  44    622,000    Thereafter    66.3  676    5,324,000

2015        

    3.1  22    539,000              

(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2009.

(2)     Approximate square feet.

 

6


Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes the diversification of trade of NNN’s Investment Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:

 

      % of Annual Base Rent(1)
    

Top 10 Lines of Trade

  2009  2008  2007

1.

  Convenience Stores  26.7%  25.7%  23.9%

2.

  Restaurants – Full Service  9.2%  8.7%  10.3%

3.

  Automotive Parts  6.8%  5.1%  4.9%

4.

  Theaters  6.3%  6.1%  4.2%

5.

  Automotive Service  5.7%  8.9%  5.2%

6.

  Books  4.1%  4.0%  4.4%

7.

  Drug Stores  4.1%  4.0%  5.0%

8.

  Restaurants – Limited Service  3.5%  3.3%  3.7%

9.

  Sporting Goods  3.2%  3.3%  3.9%

10.

  Grocery  2.9%  2.6%  2.9%
  Other  27.5%  28.3%  31.6%
           
    100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
           

(1)      Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.

The following table shows the top 10 states in which NNN’s Investment Properties are located as of December 31, 2009:

 

   

State

  # of
Properties
  % of
Annual
Base Rent
(1)

1.

  Texas  210  20.1%

2.

  Florida  85  10.0%

3.

  Illinois  39  7.0%

4.

  North Carolina  62  6.3%

5.

  Georgia  57  5.5%

6.

  Indiana  37  4.4%

7.

  Pennsylvania  87  4.3%

8.

  Ohio  31  3.8%

9.

  Tennessee  30  3.1%

10.

  Arizona  30  2.8%
  Other  347  32.7%
        
    1,015  100.0%
        

(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2009.

Mortgages and Notes Receivable

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Structured finance investments are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate.

Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008 

Mortgages and notes receivable

  $41,707  $55,495  

Structured finance investments

   -   4,514  

Accrued interest receivables

   269   387  

Unamortized premium

   -   84  
         
   41,976   60,480  

Less loan origination fees, net

   -   (8
         
  $41,976  $60,472  
         

 

7


Table of Contents

 

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests

Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”), a majority owned and consolidated subsidiary of NNN, holds the residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven commercial real estate loan securitizations. Each of the Residuals is reported at fair value based upon an independent valuation; unrealized gains or losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity, and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. The Residuals had an estimated fair value of $20,153,000 and $22,000,000 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Inventory Assets

The Inventory Portfolio, which is owned by the TRS, is comprised of two components: the Development Portfolio and the Exchange Portfolio. NNN’s Inventory Portfolio is held with the intent to sell the properties to purchasers who are looking for replacement like-kind Exchange Property or to other purchasers with different investment objectives. As of December 31, 2009, the Inventory Portfolio consisted of 18 Development Properties (12 completed and six land parcels) and one Exchange Property.

The following table summarizes the 12 completed Development Properties and one Exchange Property as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):

 

   Size(1)  Acquisition Cost(2)
   High  Low  Average  High  Low  Average

Land

  527  15  114  $8,959  $108  $1,526

Building

  224  2  27   28,717   352   3,668

(1)     Approximate square feet.

(2)     Costs vary depending upon size and local demographic factors.

Governmental Regulations Affecting Properties

Property Environmental Considerations.  Subject to a determination of the level of risk and potential cost of remediation, NNN may acquire a property where some level of contamination may exist. Investments in real property create a potential for substantial environmental liability on the part of the owner of such property from the presence or discharge of hazardous substances on the property or the improper disposal of hazardous substances emanating from the property, regardless of fault. As a part of its acquisition due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each property. In such cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the problem, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance to address environmental conditions at the property.

As of February 19, 2010, NNN has 68 Investment Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation. In general, the seller, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Investment Properties.

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.  The Investment and Inventory Properties, as commercial facilities, are required to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (the “ADA”). Investigation of a property may reveal non-compliance with the ADA. The tenants will typically have primary responsibility for complying with the ADA, but NNN may incur costs if the tenant does not comply. As of February 19, 2010, NNN has not been notified by any governmental authority of, nor is NNN’s management aware of, any non-compliance with the ADA that NNN’s management believes would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position or results of operations.

 

8


Table of Contents

 

Other Regulations.  State and local fire, life-safety and similar requirements regulate the use of NNN’s Investment and Inventory Properties. The leases generally require that each tenant will have primary responsibility for complying with regulations, but failure to comply could result in fines by governmental authorities, awards of damages to private litigants, or restrictions on the ability to conduct business on such properties.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Carefully consider the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. If any of the events or developments described below were actually to occur, NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

Current financial and economic conditions may have an adverse impact on NNN, its tenants, and commercial real estate in general.

Current financial and economic conditions continue to be challenging and the continuation or worsening of such conditions, including any disruption in the capital markets, could adversely affect NNN’s business and results of operations and the financial condition of NNN’s tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or the institutions that hold NNN’s cash balances and short-term investments, which may expose NNN to increased risks of default by these parties.

There can be no assurance that actions of the United States Government, Federal Reserve or other government and regulatory bodies intended to stabilize the economy or financial markets will achieve their intended effect. Additionally, some of these actions may adversely affect financial institutions, capital providers, retailers, consumers or NNN’s financial condition, results of operations or the trading price of NNN’s shares.

Potential consequences of the current financial and economic conditions include:

 

  

the financial condition of NNN’s tenants, which operate in the retail industry may be adversely affected, which may result in tenant defaults under the leases due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failures or for other reasons;

 

  

the ability to borrow on terms and conditions that NNN finds acceptable, or at all, may be limited, which could reduce NNN’s ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt, reduce NNN’s returns from acquisition and development activities and increase NNN’s future interest expense;

 

  

reduced values of NNN’s properties may limit NNN’s ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices and may reduce the availability of buyer financing;

 

  

the value and liquidity of NNN’s short-term investments and cash deposits could be reduced as a result of a deterioration of the financial condition of the institutions that hold NNN’s cash deposits or the institutions or assets in which NNN has made short-term investments, the dislocation of the markets for NNN’s short-term investments, increased volatility in market rates for such investments or other factors; and

 

  

one or more lenders under the Credit Facility could fail and NNN may not be able to replace the financing commitment of any such lenders on favorable terms, or at all.

NNN may be unable to obtain debt or equity capital on favorable terms, if at all.

NNN may be unable to obtain capital on favorable terms, if at all, to further its business objectives or meet its existing obligations. Debt and equity capital availability in the real estate market is severely strained. Nearly all of NNN’s debt, including the Credit Facility, is subject to balloon principal payments due at maturity. These maturities range between 2010 and 2017. The ability of NNN to make these scheduled

 

9


Table of Contents

 

principal payments may be adversely impacted by NNN’s inability to extend or refinance the Credit Facility, the inability to dispose of assets at an attractive price or the inability to obtain additional debt or equity capital. Capital that may be available may be materially more expensive or available under terms that are materially more restrictive than NNN’s existing capital which would have an adverse impact on NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Loss of revenues from tenants would reduce NNN’s cash flow.

NNN’s five largest tenants accounted for an aggregate of approximately 32 percent of NNN’s annual base rent as of December 31, 2009. The default, financial distress, bankruptcy or liquidation of one or more of NNN’s tenants could cause substantial vacancies among NNN’s Investment Portfolio. Vacancies reduce NNN’s revenues, increase property expenses and could decrease the ultimate sale value of each such vacant property. Upon the expiration of the leases that are currently in place, the tenant may choose not to renew the lease or, NNN may not be able to re-lease the vacant property at a comparable lease rate or without incurring additional expenditures in connection with such renewal or re-leasing.

A significant portion of the source of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is heavily concentrated in specific industry classifications, tenants and in specific geographic locations.

As of December 31, 2009, approximately,

 

  

55 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five retail lines of trade, including convenience stores (27 percent) and full-service restaurants (9 percent),

 

  

32 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five tenants, including Pantry (9 percent) and Susser (9 percent),

 

  

49 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five states, including Texas (20 percent) and Florida (10 percent).

Any financial hardship and/or changes in these lines of trade, tenants or states could have an adverse effect on NNN’s results of operations.

Owning real estate and indirect interests in real estate carries inherent risks.

NNN’s economic performance and the value of its real estate assets are subject to the risk that if NNN’s properties do not generate revenues sufficient to meet its operating expenses, including debt service, NNN’s cash flow and ability to pay distributions to its shareholders will be adversely affected. As a real estate company, NNN is susceptible to the following real estate industry risks, which are beyond its control:

 

  

changes in national, regional and local economic conditions and outlook,

 

  

decreases in consumer spending and retail sales,

 

  

economic downturns in the areas where NNN’s properties are located,

 

  

adverse changes in local real estate market conditions, such as an oversupply, reduction in demand or intense competition for tenants,

 

  

changes in tenant preferences that reduce the attractiveness of NNN’s properties to tenants,

 

  

zoning, regulatory restrictions, or change in taxes, and

 

  

changes in interest rates or availability of financing.

All of these factors could result in decreases in market rental rates and increases in vacancy rates, which could adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.

 

10


Table of Contents

 

NNN’s real estate investments are illiquid.

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, NNN’s ability to adjust the portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions is limited. Certain significant expenditures generally do not change in response to economic or other conditions, including: (i) debt service (if any), (ii) real estate taxes, and (iii) operating and maintenance costs. This combination of variable revenue and relatively fixed expenditures may result, under certain market conditions, in reduced earnings and could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.

NNN may be subject to known or unknown environmental liabilities.

Subject to a determination of the level of risk and potential cost of remediation, NNN may acquire a property where some level of contamination may exist. Investments in real property create a potential for substantial environmental liability on the part of the owner of such property from the presence or discharge of hazardous substances on the property or the improper disposal of hazardous substances emanating from the property, regardless of fault. As a part of its acquisition due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each property. In such cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the problem, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance to address environmental conditions at the property.

As of February 19, 2010, NNN has 68 Investment Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation. In general, the seller, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Investment Properties. In the event of a bankruptcy or other inability on the part of these parties to cover these costs, NNN may have to cover the costs of remediation, fines or other environmental liabilities at these and other properties and may have liability to third parties. NNN may also own properties where required remediation has not begun or adverse environmental conditions have not yet been detected. This may require remediation or otherwise subject NNN to liability including liability to third parties. NNN cannot assure that (i) it will not be required to undertake or pay for removal or remediation of any contamination of the properties currently or previously owned by NNN, (ii) NNN will not be subject to fines by governmental authorities or litigation, (iii) NNN will not be subject to litigation by and liability to third parties, or (iv) the costs of such removal, remediation fines, third party liability, or litigation would not be material.

NNN may not be able to successfully execute its acquisition or development strategies.

NNN cannot assure that it will be able to implement its investment strategies successfully. Additionally, NNN cannot assure that its property portfolio will expand at all, or if it will expand at any specified rate or to any specified size. In addition, investment in additional real estate assets is subject to a number of risks. Because NNN expects to invest in markets other than the ones in which its current properties are located or properties which may be leased to tenants other than those to which NNN has historically leased properties, NNN will also be subject to the risks associated with investment in new markets or with new tenants that may be relatively unfamiliar to NNN’s management team.

NNN’s development activities are subject to, without limitation, risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory approvals, the cost and timely completion of construction (including risks from factors beyond NNN’s control, such as weather or labor conditions or material shortages), the risk of finding tenants for the properties and the ability to obtain both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken or provide a tenant the opportunity to terminate a lease. Any of these situations may delay or eliminate proceeds or cash flows NNN expects from these projects, which could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.

 

11


Table of Contents

 

NNN may not be able to dispose of properties consistent with its operating strategy.

NNN may be unable to sell properties targeted for disposition (including its Inventory Properties) due to adverse market conditions. This may adversely affect, among other things, NNN’s ability to sell under favorable terms, execute its operating strategy, achieve target earnings or returns, retire or repay debt or pay dividends.

A change in the assumptions used to determine the value of commercial mortgage residual interests could adversely affect NNN’s financial position.

As of December 31, 2009, the Residuals had a carrying value of $20,153,000. The value of these Residuals is based on assumptions made by NNN to determine their value. These assumptions include discount rate, loan loss, prepayment speed and interest rate assumptions made by NNN to determine their value. If actual experience differs materially from these assumptions, the actual future cash flow could be less than expected and the value of the Residuals, as well as NNN’s earnings, could decline.

NNN may suffer a loss in the event of a default or bankruptcy of a borrower.

If a borrower defaults on a mortgage, structured finance loan or other loan made by NNN, and does not have sufficient assets to satisfy the loan, NNN may suffer a loss of principal and interest. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN may not be able to recover against all or any of the assets of the borrower, or the assets of the borrower may not be sufficient to satisfy the balance due on the loan. In addition, certain of NNN’s loans may be subordinate to other debt of a borrower. These investments are typically loans secured by a borrower’s pledge of its ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets. These agreements are typically subordinated to senior loans secured by other loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans. As of December 31, 2009, mortgages and notes receivables had an outstanding principal balance of $41,707,000. If a borrower defaults on the debt senior to NNN’s loan, or in the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN’s loan will be satisfied only after the borrower’s senior creditors’ claims are satisfied. Where debt senior to NNN’s loans exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit NNN’s ability to amend loan documents, assign the loans, accept prepayments, exercise remedies and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. Bankruptcy proceedings and litigation can significantly increase the time needed for NNN to acquire underlying collateral, if any, in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value. In addition, there are significant costs and delays associated with the foreclosure process.

Certain provisions of NNN’s leases or loan agreements may be unenforceable.

NNN’s rights and obligations with respect to its leases, structured finance loans, mortgage loans or other loans are governed by written agreements. A court could determine that one or more provisions of such an agreement are unenforceable, such as a particular remedy, a loan prepayment provision or a provision governing NNN’s security interest in the underlying collateral of a borrower or lessee. NNN could be adversely impacted if this were to happen with respect to an asset or group of assets.

Property ownership through joint ventures and partnerships could limit NNN’s control of those investments.

Joint ventures or partnerships involve risks not otherwise present for direct investments by NNN. It is possible that NNN’s co-venturers or partners may have different interests or goals than NNN at any time and they may take actions contrary to NNN’s requests, policies or objectives, including NNN’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. Other risks of joint venture or partnership investments include impasses on decisions because in some instances no single co-venturer or partner has full control over the joint venture or partnership, respectively, or the co-venturer or partner may become

 

12


Table of Contents

 

insolvent, bankrupt or otherwise unable to contribute to the joint venture or partnership, respectively. Further, disputes may develop with a co-venturer or partner over decisions affecting the property, joint venture or partnership that may result in litigation, arbitration or some other form of dispute resolution.

Competition with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors may impede NNN’s ability to grow.

NNN may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to complete suitable property acquisitions or developments on advantageous terms due to competition for such properties with others engaged in real estate investment activities. NNN’s inability to successfully acquire or develop new properties may affect NNN’s ability to achieve anticipated return on investment or realize its investment strategy, which could have an adverse effect on its results of operations.

Operating losses from retail operations on 12 Investment Properties may adversely impact NNN’s results of operations.

In June 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties. A third party manages and staffs these operations on behalf of NNN. The results of business operations from these properties are subject to the typical execution risks inherent with many retail operations including: merchandising, pricing, customer service, competition, consumer preferences and behavior, safety, compliance with various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, environmental contamination, unfavorable weather conditions, or other trends in the markets they serve. These factors could negatively impact NNN’s results of operations from these 12 Investment Properties.

Uninsured losses may adversely affect NNN’s ability to pay outstanding indebtedness.

NNN’s properties are generally covered by comprehensive liability, fire, flood, and extended insurance coverage. NNN believes that the insurance carried on its properties is adequate in accordance with industry standards. There are, however, types of losses (such as from hurricanes, wars or earthquakes) which may be uninsurable, or the cost of insuring against these losses may not be economically justifiable. If an uninsured loss occurs or a loss exceeds policy limits, NNN could lose both its invested capital and anticipated revenues from the property, thereby reducing NNN’s cash flow.

Acts of violence, terrorist attacks or war may affect the markets in which NNN operates and NNN’s results of operations.

Terrorist attacks or other acts of violence may negatively affect NNN’s operations. There can be no assurance that there will not be terrorist attacks against businesses within the United States. These attacks may directly impact NNN’s physical facilities or the businesses or the financial condition of its tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or financial institutions with which NNN has a relationship. The United States is engaged in armed conflict, which could have an impact on these parties. The consequences of armed conflict are unpredictable, and NNN may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on its business.

More generally, any of these events or threats of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and worldwide financial markets and economies. They also could result in, or cause a deepening of, economic recession in the United States or abroad. Any of these occurrences could have an adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition or results of operations.

Vacant properties or bankrupt tenants could adversely affect NNN’s business or financial condition.

As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 37 vacant, un-leased Investment Properties, including two vacant land parcels, which accounted for approximately four percent of total Investment Properties. NNN is actively marketing these properties for sale or lease but may not be able to sell or lease these properties on

 

13


Table of Contents

 

favorable terms or at all. The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from the rejection by any bankrupt tenant of any of their respective leases with NNN could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations of NNN if NNN is unable to re-lease the Investment Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of December 31, 2009, approximately one percent of the total gross leasable area of NNN’s Investment Portfolio was leased to two tenants that have filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and have the right to reject or affirm their lease with NNN. NNN anticipates the number of vacancies and bankrupt tenants will increase.

The amount of debt NNN has and the restrictions imposed by that debt could adversely affect NNN’s business and financial condition.

As of December 31, 2009, NNN had total mortgage debt outstanding of approximately $25,290,000, total unsecured notes payable of $962,056,000 and no balance outstanding on the Credit Facility. NNN’s organizational documents do not limit the level or amount of debt that it may incur. If NNN incurs additional indebtedness and permits a higher degree of leverage, debt service requirements would increase and could adversely affect NNN’s financial condition and results of operations, as well as NNN’s ability to pay principal and interest on the outstanding indebtedness or cash dividends to its stockholders. In addition, increased leverage could increase the risk that NNN may default on its debt obligations. The Credit Facility contains financial covenants that could limit the amount of distributions to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders.

The amount of debt outstanding at any time could have important consequences to NNN’s stockholders. For example, it could:

 

  

require NNN to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, real estate investments and other appropriate business opportunities that may arise in the future,

 

  

increase NNN’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions,

 

  

limit NNN’s ability to obtain any additional financing it may need in the future for working capital, debt refinancing, capital expenditures, real estate investments, development or other general corporate purposes,

 

  

make it difficult to satisfy NNN’s debt service requirements,

 

  

limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends in cash on its outstanding common and preferred stock,

 

  

limit NNN’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the factors that affect the profitability of its business, and

 

  

limit NNN’s flexibility in conducting its business, which may place NNN at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt or debt with less restrictive terms.

NNN’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal or interest on its debt, or to retire or refinance such debt will depend primarily on its future performance, which to a certain extent is subject to the creditworthiness of its tenants, competition, and economic, financial, and other factors beyond its control. There can be no assurance that NNN’s business will continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service its debt or meet its other cash needs. If NNN is unable to generate sufficient cash flow from its business, it may be required to refinance all or a portion of its existing debt, sell assets or obtain additional financing to meet its debt obligations and other cash needs.

NNN cannot assure stockholders that any such refinancing, sale of assets or additional financing would be possible or, if possible, on terms and conditions, including but not limited to the interest rate, which NNN would find acceptable or would not result in a material decline in earnings.

 

14


Table of Contents

 

NNN is obligated to comply with financial and other covenants in its debt that could restrict its operating activities, and the failure to comply with such covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt.

NNN’s unsecured debt contains various restrictive covenants which include, among others, provisions restricting NNN’s ability to:

 

  

incur or guarantee additional debt,

 

  

make certain distributions, investments and other restricted payments, including dividend payments on its outstanding common and preferred stock,

 

  

limit the ability of restricted subsidiaries to make payments to NNN,

 

  

enter into transactions with certain affiliates,

 

  

create certain liens,

 

  

consolidate, merge or sell NNN’s assets, and

 

  

pre-pay debt.

NNN’s secured debt generally contains customary covenants, including, among others, provisions:

 

  

relating to the maintenance of the property securing the debt,

 

  

restricting its ability to sell, assign or further encumber the properties securing the debt,

 

  

restricting its ability to incur additional debt,

 

  

restricting its ability to amend or modify existing leases, and

 

  

relating to certain prepayment restrictions.

NNN’s ability to meet some of its debt covenants, including covenants related to the condition of the property or payment of real estate taxes, may be dependent on the performance by NNN’s tenants under their leases.

In addition, certain covenants in NNN’s debt, including its Credit Facility, require NNN, among other things, to:

 

  

limit certain leverage ratios,

 

  

maintain certain minimum interest and debt service coverage ratios,

 

  

limit dividends declared and paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders, and

 

  

limit investments in certain types of assets.

NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.

Costs of complying with changes in governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.

NNN cannot predict what other environmental laws or regulations will be enacted in the future, how future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted, or how future laws or regulations will affect NNN’s properties. Compliance with new laws or regulations, or stricter interpretation of existing laws,

 

15


Table of Contents

 

may require NNN, its retail tenants, or consumers to incur significant expenditures or impose significant environmental liability and could cause a material adverse effect on NNN’s results of operation.

The market value of NNN’s equity and debt securities is subject to various factors that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility.

As with other publicly traded securities, the market price of NNN’s equity and debt securities depends on various factors, which may change from time-to-time and/or may be unrelated to NNN’s financial condition, operating performance or prospects that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility in such prices. These factors, among others, include:

 

  

general economic and financial market conditions including the current global economic downturn,

 

  

level and trend of interest rates,

 

  

NNN’s ability to access the capital markets to raise additional capital,

 

  

the issuance of additional equity or debt securities,

 

  

changes in NNN’s funds from operations or earnings estimates,

 

  

changes in NNN’s debt ratings or analyst ratings,

 

  

NNN’s financial condition and performance,

 

  

market perception of NNN compared to other REITs, and

 

  

market perception of REITs compared to other investment sectors.

NNN’s failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes could result in significant tax liability.

NNN intends to operate in a manner that will allow NNN to continue to qualify as a REIT. NNN believes it has been organized as, and its past and present operations qualify NNN as a REIT. However, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) could successfully assert that NNN is not qualified as such. In addition, NNN may not remain qualified as a REIT in the future. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within NNN’s control. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for NNN to qualify as a REIT or avoid significant tax liability.

If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT, it would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to stockholders in computing taxable income and would become subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. In this event, NNN could be subject to potentially significant tax liabilities and penalties. Unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, NNN would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the qualification was lost.

Even if NNN remains qualified as a REIT, NNN may face other tax liabilities that reduce operating results and cash flow.

Even if NNN remains qualified for taxation as a REIT, NNN may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes, such as mortgage recording taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease earnings and cash available

 

16


Table of Contents

 

for distribution to stockholders. In addition, in order to meet the REIT qualification requirements, NNN holds some of its assets through the TRS.

Adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes could reduce NNN’s earnings, cash flow and market price of NNN’s common stock.

At any time, the federal and state income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may change. Any such changes may have retroactive effect, and could adversely affect NNN or its stockholders. For example, legislation enacted in 2003 and extended in 2006 generally reduced the federal income tax rate on most dividends paid by corporations to individual investors to a maximum of 15 percent (through 2010). REIT dividends, with limited exceptions, will not benefit from the rate reduction, because a REIT’s income generally is not subject to corporate level tax. As such, this legislation could cause shares in non-REIT corporations to be a more attractive investment to individual investors than shares in REITs, and could have an adverse effect on the value of NNN’s common stock.

Compliance with REIT requirements, including distribution requirements, may limit NNN’s flexibility and negatively affect NNN’s operating decisions.

To maintain its status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, NNN must meet certain requirements on an on-going basis, including requirements regarding its sources of income, the nature and diversification of its assets, the amounts NNN distributes to its stockholders and the ownership of its shares. NNN may also be required to make distributions to its stockholders when it does not have funds readily available for distribution or at times when NNN’s funds are otherwise needed to fund capital expenditures or to fund debt service requirements. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, providing it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.

Changes in accounting pronouncements could adversely impact NNN’s reported financial performance.

Accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how NNN records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. From time to time the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the Commission, who create and interpret appropriate accounting standards, may change the financial accounting and reporting standards or their interpretation and application of these standards that govern the preparation of NNN’s financial statements. These changes could have a material impact on NNN’s reported financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, NNN could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in restating prior period financial statements.

NNN’s failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results and share price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. If NNN fails to maintain the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting, as such standards may be modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, NNN may not be able to ensure that it can conclude on an ongoing basis that it has effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Moreover, effective internal control over financial reporting, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for NNN to produce reliable financial reports and to maintain its qualification as a REIT and are important in helping to prevent financial fraud. If NNN cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its business and operating results could be harmed, REIT qualification could be jeopardized, investors could lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information, and the trading price of NNN’s shares could drop significantly.

 

17


Table of Contents

 

NNN’s ability to pay dividends in the future is subject to many factors.

NNN’s ability to pay dividends may be impaired if any of the risks described in this section were to occur. In addition, payment of NNN’s dividends depends upon NNN’s earnings, financial condition, maintenance of NNN’s REIT status and other factors as NNN’s Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Please refer to Item 1. “Business.”

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various legal actions that management believes is routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

 

18


Table of Contents

 

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The common stock of NNN currently is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “NNN.” Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on NNN’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity Index (“NAREIT”) and the S&P 500 Index (“S&P 500”) for the five year period commencing December 31, 2004 and ending December 31, 2009. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2004.

LOGO

 

19


Table of Contents

 

For each calendar quarter indicated, the following table reflects respective high, low and closing sales prices for the common stock as quoted by the NYSE and the dividends paid per share in each such period.

 

2009

  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
  Year

High

  $17.52  $19.48  $22.80  $21.59  $22.80

Low

   12.26   14.95   15.85   18.87   12.26

Close

   15.84   17.35   21.47   21.22   21.22

Dividends paid per share

   0.375   0.375   0.375   0.375   1.500

2008

               

High

  $23.66  $24.00  $24.57  $23.66  $24.57

Low

   19.63   20.75   19.60   10.53   10.53

Close

   22.05   20.90   23.95   17.19   17.19

Dividends paid per share

   0.355   0.375   0.375   0.375   1.480

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

 

   2009  2008 

Ordinary dividends

  $1.495182  99.6788 $1.480000  100.0000

Capital gain

   0.003051  0.2034  -  -  

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

   0.001767  0.1178  -  -  
               
  $1.500000  100.000 $1.480000  100.0000
               

NNN intends to pay regular quarterly dividends to its stockholders, although all future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, NNN’s financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

In February 2010, NNN paid dividends to its stockholders of $31,026,000 or $0.375 per share of common stock.

On January 29, 2010, there were 1,857 stockholders of record of common stock.

 

20


Table of Contents

 

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

Historical Financial Highlights

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

      2009          2008          2007          2006          2005     

Gross revenues(1)

 $243,932   $247,352   $208,629   $180,877   $151,831  

Earnings from continuing operations

  57,690    98,582    77,232    59,232    46,395  

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

  56,399    119,971    155,742    184,422    95,559  

Net earnings attributable to NNN

  54,810    117,153    154,599    181,800    89,400  

Total assets

  2,590,962    2,649,471    2,539,673    1,917,516    1,736,588  

Total debt

  987,346    1,027,391    1,049,154    890,127    861,045  

Total stockholders’ equity

  1,564,240    1,566,860    1,417,647    1,109,479    828,087  

Cash dividends declared to:

     

Common stockholders

  120,256    110,107    92,989    76,035    69,018  

Series A preferred stockholders

  -    -    -    4,376    4,008  

Series B convertible preferred stockholders

  -    -    -    419    1,675  

Series C preferred stockholders

  6,785    6,785    6,785    923    -  

Weighted average common shares:

     

Basic

  79,846,258    74,249,137    66,152,437    57,428,063    52,984,821  

Diluted

  79,953,499    74,344,231    66,263,980    57,965,508    54,418,806  

Per share information:

     

Earnings from continuing operations:

     

Basic

 $0.62   $1.23   $1.06   $0.89   $0.76  

Diluted

  0.61    1.23    1.06    0.89    0.77  

Net earnings:

     

Basic

  0.60    1.48    2.23    3.05    1.57  

Diluted

  0.60    1.48    2.22    3.03    1.56  

Cash dividends declared to:

     

Common stockholders

  1.50    1.48    1.40    1.32    1.30  

Series A preferred stockholders

  -    -    -    2.45625    2.25  

Series B convertible preferred stockholders

  -    -    -    41.875    167.50  

Series C preferred depositary stockholders

  1.84375    1.84375    1.84375    0.250955    -  

Other data:

     

Cash flows provided by (used in):

     

Operating activities

 $149,502   $237,459   $130,147   $1,676   $19,226  

Investing activities

  (28,063  (256,304  (536,717  (90,099  (230,783

Financing activities

  (108,840  (6,028  432,394    81,864    217,844  

Funds from operations – diluted(2)

  90,087    142,355    121,602    96,416    81,803  

 

 (1)Gross revenues include revenues from NNN’s continuing and discontinued operations. In accordance with FASB guidance on Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, NNN has classified the revenues related to (i) all Investment Properties that were sold and leasehold interest which expired, (ii) all Inventory Properties which generated revenues prior to disposition, and (iii) all Investment and Inventory Properties which generated revenue and were held for sale at December 31, 2009, as discontinued operations.

 

 (2)The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) developed Funds from Operations (“FFO”) as a relative non-GAAP financial measure of performance of a REIT in order to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). FFO is defined by NAREIT and is used by NNN as follows: net earnings (computed in accordance with GAAP) plus depreciation and amortization of assets unique to the real estate industry, excluding gains (or including losses) on the disposition of Investment Assets and NNN’s share of these items from NNN’s unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

FFO is generally considered by industry analysts to be the most appropriate measure of operating performance of real estate companies. FFO does not necessarily represent cash provided by operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of NNN’s operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Management considers FFO an appropriate measure of operating performance of an equity REIT because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of the

 

21


Table of Contents

 

real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, and because industry analysts have accepted it as an operating performance measure. NNN’s computation of FFO may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO used by other equity REITs, and therefore, may not be comparable to such other REITs.

NNN has earnings from discontinued operations in each of its segments, investment assets and inventory assets. All property dispositions from NNN’s investment segment are classified as discontinued operations. In addition, certain properties in NNN’s inventory segment that have generated revenues before disposition are classified as discontinued operations. These inventory properties have not historically been classified as discontinued operations, therefore, prior period comparable consolidated financial statements have been restated to include these properties in its earnings from discontinued operations. These adjustments resulted in an increase in NNN’s reported total revenues and total and per share earnings from continuing operations and a decrease in NNN’s earnings from discontinued operations. However, NNN’s total and per share net earnings available to common stockholders is not affected.

The following table reconciles FFO to their most directly comparable GAAP measure, net earnings for the years ended December 31:

 

  2009  2008  2007  2006  2005 

Reconciliation of funds from operations:

     

Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders

 $54,810   $117,153   $154,599   $181,800   $89,400  

Real estate depreciation and amortization:

     

Continuing operations

  43,067    40,850    28,864    19,171    13,355  

Discontinued operations

  1,209    940    1,518    3,248    7,052  

Partnership/joint venture real estate depreciation

  178    177    31    463    606  

Partnership gain on sale of asset

  -    -    -    (262  -  

Gain on disposition of equity investment

  -    -    -    (11,373  -  

Gain on disposition of investment assets

  (2,392  (9,980  (56,625  (91,332  (9,816

Extraordinary gain

  -    -    -    -    (14,786
                    

FFO

  96,872    149,140    128,387    101,715    85,811  

Series A preferred stock dividends(1)

  -    -    -    (4,376  (4,008

Series B convertible preferred stock dividends(1)

  -    -    -    (419  (1,675

Series C preferred stock dividends

  (6,785  (6,785  (6,785  (923  -  
                    

FFO available to common stockholders – basic

  90,087    142,355    121,602    95,997    80,128  

Series B convertible preferred stock dividends, if dilutive

  -    -    -    419    1,675  
                    

FFO available to common stockholders – diluted

 $90,087   $142,355   $121,602   $96,416   $81,803  
                    

 

 (1)

The Series A and Series B preferred stock issuances are no longer outstanding.

For a discussion of material events affecting the comparability of the information reflected in the selected financial data, refer to Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

22


Table of Contents

 

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Item 6. “Selected Financial Data,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the forward-looking disclaimer language in italics before Item 1. “Business.”

The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

Overview

NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments), and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). NNN acquires, owns, invests in, manages and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). Inventory Assets typically consist of two types of properties, property for development (“Development Properties or Development Portfolio”) and improved properties (“Exchange Properties” or “Exchange Portfolio”).

As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 1,015 Investment Properties (including 12 properties with retail operations that NNN operates), with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 11,373,000 square feet, located in 44 states. Approximately 96 percent of total properties in NNN’s Investment Portfolio was leased or operated at December 31, 2009. In addition, as of December 31, 2009, NNN had $41,976,000 in mortgages and notes receivable (including accrued interest receivable and structured finance investments) and $20,153,000 of commercial mortgage residual interests. As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 19 Inventory Properties, of which 18 were Development Properties (12 completed Inventory and six land parcels) and one was an Exchange Property.

NNN transferred 11 properties from the Inventory Portfolio to the Investment Portfolio in December 2009.

NNN’s management team focuses on certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN include items such as: the composition of NNN’s Investment Portfolio and structured finance investments (such as tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of NNN’s Investment Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios and profitability measures, and industry trends and performance compared to that of NNN.

NNN continues to maintain its diversification by tenant, geography and line of trade. NNN’s highest lines of trade concentrations are the convenience store and restaurant (including full and limited service) sectors. These sectors represent a large part of the freestanding retail property marketplace which NNN believes represents an area of attractive investment opportunity. NNN also has some geographic concentration in the south and southeast which NNN believes are historically areas of above-average population growth. Given these concentrations, any financial hardship within these sectors or geographic locations, respectively, could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and operating performance of NNN.

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, Investment Properties have remained at least 96 percent leased. The Investment Portfolio’s average remaining lease term of 12 years has remained

 

23


Table of Contents

 

fairly constant over the past three years which, coupled with its net lease structure, provides enhanced probability of maintaining occupancy and operating earnings.

The poor current economic environment has made it more difficult and more expensive to obtain debt and equity capital, which will likely reduce the pace of investments in new acquisitions or developments as well as the volume of dispositions. Additionally, the poor economic and retail environment will result in more retailers filing for bankruptcy and will make it more difficult to lease properties, which may have an adverse impact on NNN’s occupancy.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements in conformance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and judgments on assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as other disclosures in the financial statements. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments; however, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, which in turn could have a material impact on NNN’s financial statements. A summary of NNN’s accounting policies and procedures are included in Note 1 of NNN’s consolidated financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements.

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio.  NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.

Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease.  In accordance with the FASB guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases, and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values.

Real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, generally including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:

Operating method  –  Leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight- line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rental revenue varies during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.

Direct financing method  –  Leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.

Real Estate  –  Inventory Portfolio.  The TRS acquires and/or develops and owns properties primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate. The properties that are classified as held for sale at any given time may consist of properties that have been acquired in the marketplace with the intent to sell and properties

 

24


Table of Contents

 

that have been, or are currently being, constructed by the TRS. The TRS records the acquisition of the real estate at cost, including the acquisition and closing costs. The cost of the real estate developed by the TRS also includes direct and indirect costs of construction, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value.

Impairment  –  Real Estate.  Based upon the events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interest at Fair Value.  Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The commercial mortgage residual interests were acquired in connection with the acquisition of 78.9 percent equity interest of Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”). NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value.

Revenue Recognition.  Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance on accounting for leases, based on the terms of the lease at the time of acquisition of the leased asset. Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards with change in Accounting Principles.  Effective January 1, 2009, NNN adopted the new FASB guidance on accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion. The new guidance requires the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) to be separately accounted for in a manner that reflects the issuer’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate. The debt component is to be recorded based upon the estimated fair value of non-convertible debt with similar terms. The resulting debt discount is amortized over the period during which the debt is outstanding as additional non-cash interest expense. The new guidance has been applied retrospectively.

Effective January 1, 2009, NNN adopted the new FASB guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities which also required retrospective application. The adoption of the new guidance on convertible debt and share-based payments resulted in non-cash adjustments to the amounts and per share amounts.

Use of Estimates.  Additional critical accounting policies of NNN include management’s estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Additional critical accounting policies include management’s estimates of the useful lives used in calculating depreciation expense relating to real estate assets, the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including the commercial mortgage residual interests, the recoverability of the income tax benefit, the collectibility of receivables from tenants, including accrued rental income and capitalized overhead relating to development projects. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

25


Table of Contents

 

Results of Operations

Property Analysis – Investment Portfolio

General.  The following table summarizes NNN’s Investment Portfolio as of December 31:

 

   2009  2008  2007

Investment Properties Owned:

      

Number

  1,015  1,005  908

Total gross leasable area (square feet)

  11,373,000  11,251,000  10,610,000

Investment Properties:

      

Leased

  966  972  892

Operated

  12  -  -

Percent of Investment Properties – leased and operated

  96%  97%  98%

Weighted average remaining lease term (years)

  12  13  13

Total gross leasable area (square feet) – leased and operated

  10,508,000  10,728,000  10,355,000

NNN transferred 11 properties from the Inventory Portfolio to the Investment Portfolio in December 2009.

The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of NNN’s Investment Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of December 31, 2009:

 

   

% of

Annual
Base Rent
(1)

  # of
Properties
  Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)
     %
of Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
  # of
Properties
  Gross
Leasable
Area
(2)

2010

  2.3%  36  408,000  2016  1.7%  13  240,000

2011

  2.1%  21  389,000  2017  4.3%  27  676,000

2012

  3.3%  34  484,000  2018  2.9%  24  345,000

2013

  4.7%  39  849,000  2019  4.3%  42  632,000

2014

  5.0%  44  622,000  Thereafter  66.3%  676  5,324,000

2015

  3.1%  22  539,000        

(1)     Based on the annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2009.

(2)     Approximate square feet.

 

The following table summarizes the diversification of NNN’s Investment Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:

 

   

Lines of Trade

          2009                  2008                  2007        
1.  Convenience Stores  26.7%  25.7%  23.9%
2.  Restaurants – Full Service  9.2%  8.7%  10.3%
3.  Automotive Parts  6.8%  5.1%  4.9%
4.  Theaters  6.3%  6.1%  4.2%
5.  Automotive Service  5.7%  8.9%  5.2%
6.  Books  4.1%  4.0%  4.4%
7.  Drug Stores  4.1%  4.0%  5.0%
8.  Restaurants – Limited Service  3.5%  3.3%  3.7%
9.  Sporting Goods  3.2%  3.3%  3.9%
10.  Grocery  2.9%  2.6%  2.9%
  Other  27.5%  28.3%  31.6%
           
     100.0%   100.0%   100.0%
           

(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.

 

26


Table of Contents

 

The following table shows the top 10 states in which NNN’s Investment Properties are located in as of December 31, 2009:

 

   

State

  # of
    Properties    
  %
of Annual
Base Rent
(1)

  1.

  Texas  210  20.1%

  2.

  Florida  85  10.0%

  3.

  Illinois  39  7.0%

  4.

  North Carolina  62  6.3%

  5.

  Georgia  57  5.5%

  6.

  Indiana  37  4.4%

  7.

  Pennsylvania  87  4.3%

  8.

  Ohio  31  3.8%

  9.

  Tennessee  30  3.1%

10.

  Arizona  30  2.8%
  Other  347  32.7%
        
    1,015  100.0%
        

(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2009.

Property Acquisitions.  The following table summarizes the Investment Property acquisitions for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007

Acquisitions:

      

Number of Investment Properties

   8   109   235

Gross leasable area (square feet)

   290,000   868,000   2,205,000

Total dollars invested(1)

  $      36,335  $      355,107  $      696,682

(1)     Includes dollars invested on projects under construction for each respective year.

Property Dispositions.  The following table summarizes the Investment Properties sold by NNN for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

  2009  2008  2007

Number of properties

  9   19   37

Gross leasable area (square feet)

      234,000       290,000       997,000

Net sales proceeds

 $15,621  $59,796  $146,041

Net gain

 $2,392  $9,980  $56,625

NNN typically uses the proceeds from property sales either to pay down the outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) or reinvest in real estate.

 

27


Table of Contents

 

Property Analysis – Inventory Portfolio

General.  The following table summarizes the number of properties held for sale in NNN’s Inventory Portfolio as of December 31:

 

   2009  2008  2007

Development Portfolio:

      

Completed Inventory Properties

  12  11  8

Properties under construction

  -  1  9

Land parcels

  6  7  6
         
          18          19          23
         

Exchange Portfolio:

      

Inventory Properties

  1  13  33
         

Total Inventory Properties

  19  32  56
         

Property Acquisitions.  The following table summarizes the property acquisitions and dollars invested in the Inventory Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007

Development Portfolio:

      

Number of properties acquired

   2   3   3

Dollars invested(1)

  $    2,633  $9,545  $64,694

Exchange Portfolio:

      

Number of properties acquired

   -   4   23

Dollars invested

  $-  $19,994  $105,152

Total dollars invested

  $2,633  $    29,539  $    169,846

(1)     Includes dollars invested in projects under construction or tenant improvements for each respective year.

Property Dispositions.  The following table summarizes the number of Inventory Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized from the disposition of real estate held for sale included in earnings from continuing and discontinued operations for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007
   # of
Properties
  Gain  # of
Properties
  Gain  # of
Properties
  Gain

Development(1)

  3  $569  6  $4,751  13  $5,125

Exchange

  1   12  19   4,607  58   5,888
                     
                  4  $    581              25  $    9,358              71  $    11,013
                     

(1)     Net of noncontrolling interests.

 

28


Table of Contents

 

Revenue from Continuing Operations Analysis

General.  During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN’s rental income increased primarily due to the acquisition of Investment Properties (See “Results of Operations – Property Analysis – Investment Portfolio – Property Acquisitions”). NNN anticipates any significant increase in rental income will continue to come primarily from additional property acquisitions.

The following summarizes NNN’s revenues from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):

 

        Percent of Total 2009
Versus
2008
Percent

Increase
(Decrease)
 2008
Versus
2007
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
  2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007  

Rental Income(1)

 $  214,625 $  210,684 $  163,669 92.6% 92.4% 91.2% 1.9% 28.7%

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

  8,387  7,012  5,591 3.6% 3.1% 3.1% 19.6% 25.4%

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

  4,535  5,804  5,268 2.0% 2.5% 3.0% (21.9)% 10.2%

Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests

  4,252  4,636  4,882 1.8% 2.0% 2.7% (8.3)% (5.0)%
                 

Total revenues from continuing operations

 $231,799 $228,136 $179,410 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 1.6% 27.2%
                 

(1)     Includes rental income from operating leases, earned income from direct financing leases and percentage rent from continuing operations (“Rental Income”).

Revenue from Operations by Source of Income.  NNN has identified two primary operating segments, and thus, sources of revenue: (i) earnings from NNN’s Investment Assets, and (ii) earnings from NNN’s Inventory Assets. NNN revenues from continuing operations come primarily from Investment Assets. The following table summarizes the revenues from continuing operations for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

            Percent of Total  2009
Versus
2008
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
  2008
Versus
2007
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
   2009  2008  2007  2009  2008  2007    

Investment Assets

  $231,623  $228,009  $179,079  99.9%  99.9%  99.8%  1.6%  27.3%

Inventory Assets

   176   127   331  0.1%  0.1%  0.2%  38.6%  (61.6)%
                         

Total revenues

  $231,799  $228,136  $179,410  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  1.6%  27.2%
                         

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2009 to Year Ended December 31, 2008.

Rental Income.  Rental Income increased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008, due to a full year of Rental Income from the 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet which were acquired during 2008. Additionally, eight Investment Properties were acquired in 2009 with an aggregate gross leasable area of 290,000 square feet. In addition, NNN recorded $5,072,000 as compared to $2,671,000 in lease termination fees and rent settlement fees during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

29


Table of Contents

 

Real Estate Expense Reimbursement from Tenants.  Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants increased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008. The increase is attributable to the reimbursements from certain properties acquired in 2008 as well as reimbursements resulting from the re-leasing of existing vacancies.

Interest and Other Income from Real Estate Transactions.  Interest and other income from real estate transactions decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008, primarily due to a lower weighted average principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments during the year ended December 31, 2009. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments was $38,968,000 and $57,475,000, respectively.

Interest Income on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests.  Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to December 31, 2008 but remained stable as a percent of total revenue from continuing operations. The decrease in interest income on Residuals is primarily the result of the increase in the loan delinquencies and asset amortization, which is partially offset by a decrease in loan prepayments.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2008 to Year Ended December 31, 2007.

Rental Income.  Rental Income increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, primarily from the addition of 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet. In addition, the increase in Rental Income is also attributable to a full year of Rental Income from the 235 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 2,205,000 square feet which were acquired during the year ended December 31, 2007.

Real Estate Expense Reimbursement from Tenants.  Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants remained consistent as a percentage of total revenues from continuing operations. The increase for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007, was attributable to a full year of reimbursements from certain tenants acquired in 2007 and the reimbursements from newly acquired properties in 2008.

Interest and Other Income from Real Estate Transactions.  Interest and other income from real estate transactions increased slightly for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to 2007. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable balance. For the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable was $57,475,000 and $47,705,000, respectively. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in interest income earned on the structured finance investments. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s structured finance investments was $8,614,000 and $16,795,000, respectively.

Interest Income on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests.  Interest income on the Residuals for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to December 31, 2007, decreased slightly as a result of lower outstanding loan balances. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest income due to the increase in the discount rate from 17% to 25% during the third quarter of 2007.

Gain from Disposition of Real Estate, Inventory Portfolio.  Inventory Properties typically are operating properties and are classified as discontinued operations. However, the gains on the sale of Inventory Properties which are sold prior to rent commencement are reported in continuing operations. The slight decrease in the gain from the disposition of real estate is solely dependent on respective sales price and cost basis of the Inventory Properties sold.

 

30


Table of Contents

 

Analysis of Expenses from Continuing Operations

General.  During 2009, operating expenses from continuing operations increased primarily due to the impairments recorded on real estate. The following summarizes NNN’s expenses from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007 

General and administrative

  $21,776   $24,878   $23,565  

Real estate

   13,684    10,007    7,805  

Depreciation and amortization

   46,769    44,181    31,340  

Impairment – real estate

   28,114    1,234    416  

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation

   498    758    638  

Restructuring costs

   731    -    -  
             

Total operating expenses

  $111,572   $81,058   $63,764  
             

Interest and other income

  $(1,375 $(3,748 $(4,751

Interest expense

   62,151    63,964    51,846  

Loss on interest rate hedge

   -    804    -  
             

Total other expenses (revenues)

  $    60,776   $    61,020   $    47,095  
             

 

  Percentage of Total
Operating Expenses
 Percentage of
Revenues from
Continuing Operations
 2009
Versus
2008
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
 2008
Versus
2007
Percent
Increase
(Decrease)
  2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007  

General and administrative

 19.5% 30.7% 37.0% 9.4% 10.9% 13.1% (12.5)% 5.6%

Real estate

 12.3% 12.4% 12.2% 5.9% 4.4% 4.4% 36.7% 28.2%

Depreciation and amortization

 41.9% 54.5% 49.1% 20.2% 19.4% 17.5% 5.9% 41.0%

Impairment – real estate

 25.2% 1.5% 0.7% 12.1% 0.5% 0.2% 2,178.3% 196.6%

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

 0.4% 0.9% 1.0% 0.2% 0.3% 0.4% (34.3)% 18.8%

Restructuring costs

 0.7% - - 0.3% - - N/C(1) -
              

Total operating expenses

 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 48.1% 35.5% 35.6% 37.6% 27.1%
              

Interest and other income

 (2.3)% (6.1)% (10.1)% (0.6)% (1.7)% (2.7)% (63.3)% (21.1)%

Interest expense

 102.3% 104.8% 110.1% 26.8% 28.0% 28.9% (2.8)% 23.4%

Loss on interest rate hedge

 - 1.3% - - 0.4% - (100.0)% N/C(1)
              

Total other expenses (revenues)

 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 26.2% 26.7% 26.2% (0.4)% 29.6%
              

(1)     Not calculable (“N/C”)

Comparison of Year End December 31, 2009 to Year Ended December 31, 2008.

General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008 and decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, is primarily attributable to a decrease in compensation of personnel and a decrease in lost pursuit costs.

Real Estate.  Real estate expenses remained fairly stable as a percentage of total operating expenses, but increased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in real estate expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, is primarily attributable to an increase in tenant reimbursable real estate expenses from 2008 acquisitions as well as an increase in expenses related to un-leased properties.

 

31


Table of Contents

 

Depreciation and Amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased as a percentage of total operating expenses and increased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The dollar increase is primarily a result of depreciation recognized on the 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet acquired in 2008. This increase is partially offset by the additional amortization in connection with the termination of certain leases during 2008.

Impairment  –  Real Estate.  Based upon the events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive return. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. As a result of the Company’s review of long-lived assets for impairments, for the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, NNN recorded real estate impairments totaling $28,114,000 and $1,234,000, respectively.

Impairment  –  Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests Valuation.  In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation adjustment of $498,000 and $758,000 respectively, as a reduction of earnings from operations.

Restructuring Costs.  During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $731,000 in connection with a workforce reduction. No such costs were incurred during 2008.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008, and decreased as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to a decrease of $99,907,000 in weighted average long-term debt outstanding.

The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:

 

 (i)repurchase of $2,500,000 and $8,500,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028 with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in May 2009 and February 2009, respectively,

 

 (ii)repurchase of $3,800,000, $5,000,000 and $25,000,000 of convertible notes payable due September 2026 with an effective interest rate of 5.840% in March 2009, January 2009 and November 2008, respectively,

 

 (iii)issuance of $234,035,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028, with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in March 2008,

 

 (iv)payoff of the $100,000,000 7.125% notes payable in March 2008,

 

 (v)payoff of the $12,000,000 10.00% secured note payable in February 2008,

 

 (vi)the decrease of $78,860,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the Credit Facility for year ended December 31, 2009 as compared to 2008, and

 

 (vii)the decrease in weighted average interest rate on the Credit Facility from 3.83% during the year ended December 31, 2008, to 1.19% during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Comparison of Year End December 31, 2008 to Year Ended December 31, 2007.

General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, but decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase in the

 

32


Table of Contents

 

amount of general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, is primarily related to an increase in lost pursuit costs.

Real Estate.  Real estate expenses remained stable as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations, but increased slightly as a percentage of total operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in real estate expenses for the year ended December 31, 2008, is primarily attributable to an increase in tenant reimbursable real estate expenses related to newly acquired Investment Properties as well as an increase in expenses related to vacant properties.

Depreciation and Amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expenses increased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase is primarily a result of the depreciation recognized on (i) the 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet, acquired in 2008, and (ii) a full year of depreciation and amortization on the 235 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 2,205,000 square feet which were acquired during the year ended December 31, 2007.

Impairment – Real Estate.  NNN reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive return. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, $1,234,000 and $416,000 of real estate impairments were recorded, respectively.

Impairment – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests Valuation.  In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation adjustment of $758,000 and $638,000, respectively, as a reduction of earnings from operations.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, but decreased as a percentage of total operating expense and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase in interest expenses is primarily attributable to an increase of $233,201,000 in weighted average long-term debt outstanding. The increase in interest expense was partially offset by an overall decrease in weighted average interest rate for 2008 as compared to 2007.

The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:

 

 (i)repurchase of $25,000,000 of convertible notes payable due September 2026 with an effective interest rate of 5.840% in November 2008,

 

 (ii)issuance of $234,035,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028, with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in March 2008,

 

 (iii)payoff of the $100,000,000 7.125% notes payable in March 2008,

 

 (iv)payoff of the $12,000,000 10.00% secured note payable in February 2008,

 

 (v)payoff of $26,041,000 10-year financing lease obligation with interest rate of 5.00% in November 2007,

 

 (vi)payoff of the $10,500,000 10.00% secured note in December 2007,

 

 (vii)payoff of the $20,800,000 variable rate term note in October 2007,

 

33


Table of Contents

 

 (viii)repayment of mortgage in September 2007, with balance of $7,305,000 at December 31, 2006, and an interest rate of 7.37%,
 (ix)issuance of $250,000,000 of notes payable due October 2017, with an effective interest rate of 6.92% in September 2007,

 

 (x)decrease of $5,403,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the revolving Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, and

 

 (xi)decrease in weighted average interest rate on the revolving Credit Facility from 6.24% for the period ended December 31, 2007, to 3.83% for the period ended December 31, 2008.

Discontinued Operations

Earnings (Loss)

NNN classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses related to its Investment Properties that were sold, its leasehold interests that expired or were terminated and any Investment Properties that were held for sale at December 31, 2009. NNN also classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses of its Inventory Properties that generated rental revenues. NNN records discontinued operations by NNN’s identified segments: (i) Investment Assets, and (ii) Inventory Assets. The following table summarizes the earnings from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

  2009  2008  2007 
 # of Sold
Properties
 Gain Earnings/
(Loss)
  # of Sold
Properties
 Gain Earnings/
(Loss)
  # of Sold
Properties
 Gain Earnings/
(Loss)
 

Investment Assets

 9 2,392 260   19 $9,980 $12,112   37 $56,625 $68,976  

Inventory Assets

 2 558 (1,551 24  9,347  9,277   69  10,681  9,534  

Noncontrolling interests

 - - (47 -  -  (2,927 -  -  (1,299
                         
             11     2,950 (1,338             43 $  19,327 $  18,462           106 $  67,306 $  77,211  
                         

NNN periodically sells Investment Properties and may reinvest the sales proceeds to purchase additional properties. NNN evaluates its ability to pay dividends to stockholders by considering the combined effect of income from continuing and discontinued operations.

Impairment—Real Estate.  NNN periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive price. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, NNN recognized real estate impairments on discontinued operations of $6,400,000, $4,426,000, and $1,554,000, respectively.

Impact of Inflation

NNN’s leases typically contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on NNN’s results of operations. Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent, rent increases may not keep up with the rate of inflation.

 

34


Table of Contents

 

The Investment Properties are leased to tenants under long-term, net leases which typically require the tenant to pay certain operating expenses of a property, thus, NNN’s exposure to inflation is reduced. Inflation may have an adverse impact on NNN’s tenants.

Liquidity

General.  NNN’s demand for funds has been and will continue to be primarily for (i) payment of operating expenses and cash dividends; (ii) property acquisitions and development; (iii) origination of mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments); (iv) capital expenditures; (v) payment of principal and interest on its outstanding indebtedness; and (vi) other investments.

NNN expects to meet these requirements (other than amounts required for additional property investments, mortgages and notes receivables, including structured finance investments) through cash provided from operations and NNN’s Credit Facility. NNN utilizes the Credit Facility to meet its short-term working capital requirements. As of December 31, 2009, no balance was outstanding and $400,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $653,000. NNN anticipates that any additional investments in properties, mortgages and notes receivables and structured finance investments during the next 12 months will be funded by the Credit Facility, cash provided from operations, the issuance of long-term debt or the issuance of common or preferred equity or other instruments convertible into or exchangeable for common or preferred equity. However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.

Cash and Cash Equivalents.  The table below summarizes NNN’s cash flows for each of the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007 

Cash and cash equivalents:

    

Provided by operating activities

  $149,502   $237,459   $130,147  

Used in investing activities

   (28,063      (256,304      (536,717

Provided by (used in) financing activities

       (108,840  (6,028  432,394  
             

Increase (decrease)

   12,599    (24,873  25,824  

Net cash at beginning of period

   2,626    27,499    1,675  
             

Net cash at end of period

  $    15,225   $    2,626   $    27,499  
             

Cash provided by operating activities represents cash received primarily from rental income from tenants, proceeds from the disposition of Inventory Properties and interest income less cash used for general and administrative expenses, interest expense and acquisition and disposition of its Inventory Properties. NNN’s cash flow from operating activities, net of cash used in and provided by the acquisition and disposition of its Inventory Properties, has been sufficient to pay the distributions for each period presented. NNN uses proceeds from its Credit Facility to fund the acquisition of its Inventory Properties. The change in cash provided by operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, is primarily the result of changes in revenues and expenses as discussed in “Results of Operations.” Cash generated from operations is expected to fluctuate in the future.

Changes in cash for investing activities are primarily attributable to the acquisitions and dispositions of Investment Properties.

NNN’s financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2009, included the following significant transactions:

 

  

$8,588,000 in net payments on the repurchase of $11,000,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028 with an effective interest rate of 7.192%,

 

  

$6,994,000 in net payments on the repurchase of $8,800,000 of convertible notes payable due September 2026 with an effective interest rate of 5.84%,

 

35


Table of Contents

 

  

$120,256,000 in dividends paid to common stockholders,

 

  

$6,785,000 in dividends paid to holders of the depositary shares of NNN’s Series C Preferred Stock,

 

  

$67,354,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of 3,766,452 shares of common stock in connection with the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”), and

 

  

$26,500,000 in net payments on NNN’s Credit Facility.

Financing Strategy.  NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategy while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to NNN’s stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.

NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional Investment Properties with cash from its Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2009, no balance was outstanding and $400,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $653,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN’s ratio of total liabilities to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation) was approximately 37 percent and the secured indebtedness to total gross assets was approximately one percent. The total debt to total market capitalization was approximately 36 percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances. The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments.  The information in the following table summarizes NNN’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2009. There was no outstanding balance on the Credit Facility at December 31, 2009. The table presents principal cash flows by year-end of the expected maturity for debt obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2009.

 

   Expected Maturity Date (dollars in thousands)
   Total  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  Thereafter

Long-term debt(1)

  $1,007,025  $21,022  $139,798  $69,290  $223,898  $150,881  $402,136

Operating lease

   4,557   891   917   945   973   831   -
                            

Total contractual cash obligations(2)

  $1,011,582  $21,913  $140,715  $70,235  $224,871  $151,712  $402,136
                            

(1)     Includes amounts outstanding under the mortgages payable, convertible notes payable and notes payable and excludes unamortized note discounts.

(2)     Excludes $7,471 of accrued interest payable.

In addition to the contractual obligations outlined above, in connection with the development of two Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction, land costs and tenant improvements) of $14,651,000. As of December 31, 2009, NNN had funded $12,261,000 of this commitment, with $2,390,000 remaining to be funded. As of December 31, 2009, NNN did not have any funding commitments relating to the development of Inventory Properties.

As of December 31, 2009, NNN had outstanding letters of credit totaling $653,000 under its Credit Facility.

 

36


Table of Contents

 

As of December 31, 2009, NNN did not have any other material contractual cash obligations, such as purchase obligations, financing lease obligations or other long-term liabilities other than those reflected in the table. In addition to items reflected in the table, NNN has issued preferred stock with cumulative preferential cash distributions, as described below under “Dividends.”

Management anticipates satisfying these obligations with a combination of NNN’s cash provided from operations, current capital resources on hand, its Credit Facility, debt or equity financings and asset dispositions.

Many of the Investment Properties are recently constructed and are generally net leased. Therefore, management anticipates that capital demands to meet obligations with respect to these Investment Properties will be modest for the foreseeable future and can be met with funds from operations and working capital. Certain of NNN’s Investment Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for certain costs and expenses associated with the Investment Property. Management anticipates the costs associated with NNN’s vacant Investment Properties or those Investment Properties that become vacant will also be met with funds from operations and working capital. NNN may be required to borrow under its Credit Facility or use other sources of capital in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures.

The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from vacant properties or uncollectibility of lease revenues could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations if NNN is unable to release the Investment Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 37 vacant, un-leased Investment Properties (including two vacant land parcels) which accounted for approximately four percent of total Investment Properties held in NNN’s Investment Portfolio. Additionally, as of January 31, 2010, one Investment Property is leased to a tenant that filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result, this tenant has the right to reject or affirm its leases with NNN.

In May 2008, one of NNN’s tenants, Uni-Mart, Inc. (“Uni-Mart”), which leased 77 properties, filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. During the year ended December 31, 2008, Uni-Mart elected to reject the leases of 16 properties owned by NNN. NNN had re-leased 15 of the 16 properties as of December 31, 2009. On April 1, 2009, Uni-Mart rejected the leases of 36 additional properties. All of the 36 properties were subject to subleases with convenience store operators and all of the subleases with the operators were assigned from Uni-Mart to NNN effective April 1, 2009. On April 30, 2009, Uni-Mart assumed all of the remaining leases for 24 properties between Uni-Mart and NNN. In January 2010, these leases were assigned from Uni-Mart to other operators, and NNN no longer has any leases with Uni-Mart as of January 8, 2010. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, NNN recorded $3,371,000 and $2,421,000, respectively, of income in connection with the Uni-Mart bankruptcy rent settlement.

On April 20, 2009, one of NNN’s tenants, Titlemax Holdings, LLC and its affiliated companies (collectively, “Titlemax”), which leased 30 Investment Properties from NNN, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. On February 3, 2010, Titlemax assumed all of its leases with NNN.

Dividends.  NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and related regulations and intends to continue to operate so as to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost. Such an event could materially adversely affect NNN’s income and ability to pay dividends.

 

37


Table of Contents

 

One of NNN’s primary objectives, consistent with its policy of retaining sufficient cash for reserves and working capital purposes and maintaining its status as a REIT, is to distribute a substantial portion of its funds available from operations to its stockholders in the form of dividends. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, NNN declared and paid dividends to its common stockholders of $120,256,000, $110,107,000, and $92,989,000, respectively, or $1.50, $1.48 and $1.40 per share, respectively, of common stock.

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

 

  2009 2008 2007

Ordinary dividends

 $1.495182 99.6788% $1.480000 100.000% $1.397402 99.8144%

Qualified dividends

  - -  - -  0.000414 0.0296%

Capital gain

  0.003051 0.2034%  - -  0.002184 0.1560%

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

  0.001767 0.1178%  - -  - -
               
 $    1.500000 100.000% $    1.480000 100.000% $    1.400000 100.0000%
               

In February 2010, NNN paid dividends to its common stockholders of $31,026,000, or $0.375 per share of common stock.

Holders of NNN’s preferred stock issuance are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash distributions based on the stated rate and liquidation preference per annum. The following table outlines the issuance of NNN’s preferred stock:

 

Non Voting
Preferred Stock
Issuance

 Shares
Outstanding
At December 31,
2009
 Liquidation
Preference Per
Share
 Fixed Annual
Cash
Distribution
(per share)

7.375% Series C(1)

     3,680,000     25.00     1.84375

 

 (1)

In October 2006, NNN issued 3,680,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. See Capital Resources – Debt and Equity Securities.”

 

NNN declared and paid dividends to its Series C Preferred stockholders of $6,785,000 or $1.84375 per depository share during each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.

Capital Resources

Generally, cash needs for property acquisitions, mortgages and notes receivable investments, debt payments, dividends, structured finance investments, capital expenditures, development and other investments have been funded by equity and debt offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties and, to a lesser extent, by internally generated funds. Cash needs for other items have been met from operations. If available, future sources of capital include proceeds from the public or private offering of NNN’s debt or equity securities, secured or unsecured borrowings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties, as well as undistributed funds from operations.

 

38


Table of Contents

 

Debt

The following is a summary of NNN’s total outstanding debt as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  Percentage of
Total
  2008  Percentage of
Total

Line of credit payable

  $-  -  $26,500  2.6%

Mortgages payable

   25,290  2.6%   26,290  2.6%

Notes payable – convertible

   343,380  34.8%   356,122  34.6%

Notes payable

   618,676  62.6%   618,479  60.2%
              

Total outstanding debt

  $        987,346          100.0%  $        1,027,391          100.0%
              

Indebtedness.  NNN expects to use indebtedness primarily for property acquisitions and development of single-tenant retail properties, either directly or through investment interests, and mortgages and notes receivable.

Line of Credit Payable.  NNN’s $400,000,000 revolving Credit Facility had a weighted average outstanding balance of $10,824,000 and a weighted average interest rate of 1.19% during the year ended December 31, 2009. In November 2009, NNN entered into a credit agreement for a new $400,000,000 credit facility, replacing the former revolving credit facility (as the context requires, the previous and new revolving credit facility, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures November 2012, with an option to extend maturity to November 2013. The Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 280 basis points with a 1.0% LIBOR floor; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN’s debt rating. The Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature for NNN to increase, at its option, the facility size up to $500,000,000. As of December 31, 2009, no balance was outstanding, and $400,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $653,000.

In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage, and (iv) investment limitations. At December 31, 2009, NNN was in compliance with those covenants. In the event that NNN violates any of these restrictive financial covenants, it could cause the indebtedness under the Credit Facility to be accelerated and may impair NNN’s access to the debt and equity markets and limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends to its common and preferred stockholders, each of which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operation.

Mortgages Payable.  The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):

 

Entered

  Balance  Interest
Rate
  Maturity(3)  Carrying
Value of
Encumbered
Asset(s)
(1)
  Outstanding Principal
Balance at December 31,
         2009  2008

December 1999(4)

  $350  8.50 December 2009  $-  $-  $49

December 2001(2)

   623  9.00 April 2014   820   267   315

December 2001(2)

   698  9.00 April 2019   1,247   392   418

December 2001(2)

   485  9.00 April 2019   1,215   201   214

June 2002

       21,000  6.90 July 2012   24,505   19,170   19,477

February 2004(2)

   6,952  6.90 January 2017   11,764   4,554   5,036

March 2005(2)

   1,015  8.14 September 2016   1,341   706   781
                 
       $        40,892  $        25,290  $        26,290
                 

 

 (1)

Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of NNN’s properties. The carrying values of the assets are as of December 31, 2009.

 (2)

Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan. The corresponding original principal balance represents the outstanding principal balance at the time of acquisition.

 (3)

Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.

 (4)

In December 2009, upon maturity NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance and the property was released from the mortgage lien. This was a self-amortizing mortgage.

 

39


Table of Contents

 

Notes Payable – Convertible.  Each of NNN’s outstanding series of convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

 

Terms

  2026
Notes(1)(2)(4)
  2028
Notes(2)(5)(6)
 

Issue Date

   September 2006    March 2008  

Net Proceeds

  $168,650   $228,576  

Stated Interest Rate(8)

   3.950%    5.125%  

Debt Issuance Costs

  $3,850(3)  $5,459(7) 

Earliest Conversion Date

           September 2025            June 2027  

Earliest Put Option Date

   September 2011    June 2013  

Maturity Date

   September 2026    June 2028  

Original Principal

  $172,500   $234,035  

Repurchases

   (33,800  (11,000
         

Outstanding principal balance at December 31, 2009

  $138,700   $223,035  
         

 

 (1)

NNN repurchased $3,800, $5,000 and $25,000 in March 2009, January 2009 and November 2008, respectively, for a purchase price of $3,100, $3,894 and $19,188, respectively, resulting in a gain of $607, $958 and $4,961, respectively.

 (2)

Debt issuance costs include underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the period to the earliest put option date of the holders using the effective interest method.

 (3)

Includes $48, $66 and $349 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $3,800, $5,000 and $25,000 of the 2026 Notes, respectively.

 (4)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 41.6750 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $23.9952 per share of common stock.

 (5)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 39.3459 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $25.4156 per share of common stock.

 (6)

NNN repurchased $2,500 and $8,500 in May 2009 and February 2009, respectively, for a purchase price of $2,049 and $6,539, respectively, resulting in a gain of $342 and $1,525, respectively.

 (7)

Includes $48 and $171 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $2,500 and $8,500 of the 2028 Notes, respectively.

 (8)

With the adoption of the new accounting guidance on convertible debt securities, the effective interest rate for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes are 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively.

Each series of convertible notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of the Company. Each note is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through but not including the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

Notes Payable. Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

 

    Notes    

  Issue Date  Principal  Discount(3)  Net Price  Stated
Rate
  Effective
Rate
(4)
  Maturity
Date

2010(1)

  September 2000  $    20,000  $        126  $    19,874  8.500%  8.595%  September 2010

2012(1)

  June 2002   50,000   287   49,713  7.750%  7.833%  June 2012

2014(1)(2)(5)

  June 2004   150,000   440   149,560  6.250%  5.910%  June 2014

2015(1)

  November 2005   150,000   390   149,610  6.150%  6.185%  December 2015

2017(1)(6)

  September 2007   250,000   877   249,123  6.875%  6.924%  October 2017

 

 (1)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility.

 (2)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to repay the obligation of the 2004 Notes.

 (3)

The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.

 (4)

Includes the effects of the discount, treasury lock gain and swap gain (as applicable).

 (5)

NNN entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement which fixed a swap rate of 4.61% on a notional amount of $94,000. Upon issuance of the 2014 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting interest rate swap agreement resulting in a gain of $4,148. The gain has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2014 Notes using the effective interest method.

 (6)

NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of $3,260, of which $3,228 was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.

 

40


Table of Contents

 

Each series of notes represent senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. The notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

In connection with the note and convertible note offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling $5,459,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.

In accordance with the terms of the indentures, pursuant to which NNN’s notes and convertible notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios, and (ii) certain interest coverage. At December 31, 2009, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.

In March 2008, NNN repaid the 7.125% $100,000,000 notes that were due in March 2008.

Debt and Equity Securities

NNN has used, and expects to use in the future, issuances of debt and equity securities primarily to pay down its outstanding indebtedness and to finance investment acquisitions. NNN has maintained investment grade debt ratings from Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s Investor Service and Fitch Ratings on its senior, unsecured debt since 1998. In June 2008, NNN’s debt rating was upgraded by Moody’s Investor Service. In February 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) which was automatically effective and permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities.

A description of NNN’s outstanding series of publicly held notes is found under “Debt – Notes Payable – Convertible” and “Debt – Notes Payable” above.

7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.  In October 2006, NNN issued 3,200,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and received gross proceeds of $80,000,000. In addition, NNN issued an additional 480,000 depositary shares in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received gross proceeds of $12,000,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs of approximately $3,098,000, consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

Holders of the depositary shares are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 7.375% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per depositary share per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $1.84375 per depositary share). The Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares ranks senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. NNN may redeem the Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares on or after October 12, 2011, for cash, at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends.

 

41


Table of Contents

 

In January 2007, NNN used $44,540,000 of the net proceeds from the offering to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock; and the remainder of the net proceeds were used to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility.

Common Stock Issuances.  In March 2007, NNN issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $24.70 per share and received net proceeds of $118,020,000. Subsequently, in April 2007, NNN issued an additional 750,000 shares of common stock in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received net proceeds of $17,730,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $6,217,000 consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

In October 2007, NNN issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $25.94 per share and received net proceeds of $99,150,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $4,874,000 consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees. In October 2007, NNN used a portion of the net proceeds to repay the outstanding principal balance on its term note.

In October 2008, NNN issued 3,450,000 shares of common stock in a registered, underwritten public offering at a price of $23.05 per share and received net proceeds of $75,958,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $3,565,000 consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees. NNN used the net proceeds to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility and to acquire Investment Properties.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.  In June 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement which was automatically effective, with the Commission for its DRIP, which permits the issuance by NNN of 16,000,000 shares of common stock. NNN’s DRIP provides an economical and convenient way for current stockholders and other interested new investors to invest in NNN’s common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to NNN’s DRIP for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

    2009  2008  2007

Shares of common stock

   3,766,452   2,146,640   2,645,257

Net proceeds

  $67,354  $47,372  $62,980

The proceeds from the issuances were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness under NNN’s Credit Facility.

Mortgages and Notes Receivable.

Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

    2009  2008 

Mortgages and notes receivable

  $41,707  $55,495  

Structured finance investments

   -   4,514  

Accrued interest receivable

   269   387  

Unamortized premium

   -   84  
         
   41,976   60,480  

Less loan origination fees, net

   -   (8
         
  $41,976  $60,472  
         

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Structured finance investments are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate.

 

42


Table of Contents

 

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests.

In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, NNN adjusted carrying value of the Residuals to reflect such fair value at December 31, 2009. Due to changes in market conditions relating to residual assets, the independent valuation changed several valuation assumptions. The following table summarizes the changes to the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of December 31:

 

    2009  2008

Discount rate

  25%  25%

Average life equivalent CPR speeds range

  14.5% to 20.7% CPR  31.7% to 39.4% CPR

Foreclosures:

    

Frequency curve default model

  6% average rate  1.1% maximum rate

Loss severity of loans in foreclosure

  20%  10%

Yield:

    

LIBOR

  Forward 3-month curve  Forward 3-month curve

Prime

  Forward curve  Forward curve

The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

    2009  2008  2007

Unrealized gains

  $-  $2,009  $-

Unrealized losses

   1,640   -   326

Other than temporary valuation impairment

   498   758   638

Business Combination.

In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of its tenants, in June 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties. The note foreclosure resulted in a loss of $7,816,000. NNN recorded the value of the assets received at fair value. No liabilities were assumed. The fair value of the assets resulted in goodwill of $3,400,000.

 

43


Table of Contents

 

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

NNN is exposed to interest rate risk primarily as a result of its variable rate Credit Facility and its fixed rate debt which is used to finance NNN’s development and acquisition activities, as well as for general corporate purposes. NNN’s interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives, NNN borrows at both fixed and variable rates on its long-term debt. As of December 31, 2009, NNN had no outstanding derivatives.

The information in the table below summarizes NNN’s market risks associated with its debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. The table presents principal payments and related interest rates by year for debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2009. NNN has a variable interest rate risk on its Credit Facility which had no outstanding balance as of December 31, 2009. The weighted average rate for the Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2009 was 1.19%. The fair value of the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $0 and $26,500,000, respectively. The table incorporates only those debt obligations that existed as of December 31, 2009; it does not consider those debt obligations or positions which could arise after this date. Moreover, because firm commitments are not presented in the table below, the information presented therein has limited predictive value. As a result, NNN’s ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, NNN’s hedging strategies at that time and interest rates. If interest rates on NNN’s variable rate debt increased by one percent, NNN’s interest expense would have increased by one percent for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

Fixed Rate Debt Obligations (dollars in thousands)

    Mortgages  Unsecured Debt(1)
    Debt
  Obligation  
  Weighted
Average

Interest Rate
  Debt
  Obligation  
  Effective
Interest Rate

2010

  $1,022  7.19%  $19,987  8.60%

2011

   1,098  7.20%   134,421  5.84%

2012

   19,290  6.92%   49,909  7.83%

2013

   863  7.35%   208,960  7.19%

2014

   880  7.27%   149,771  5.91%

Thereafter

   2,137  7.36%   399,008  6.65%
            

Total

  $25,290  7.01%  $962,056  6.64%
            

Fair Value:

        

December 31, 2009

  $25,290    $987,275  
            

December 31, 2008

  $26,290    $709,944  
            

 

 (1)

Includes NNN’s notes payable and convertible notes payable, each net of unamortized discounts. NNN uses Bloomberg software to determine the fair value.

NNN is also exposed to market risks related to NNN’s Residuals. Factors that may impact the market value of the Residuals include delinquencies, loan losses, prepayment speeds and interest rates. The Residuals, which are reported at market value based upon an independent valuation, had a carrying value of $20,153,000 and $22,000,000 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Losses are considered other than temporary and reported as a valuation impairment in earnings from operations if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows that leads to a loss in value.

 

44


Table of Contents

 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and our report dated February 25, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

LOGO

Miami, Florida

February 25, 2010

 

45


Table of Contents

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), National Retail Property Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

LOGO

Miami, Florida

February 25, 2010

 

46


Table of Contents

 

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

ASSETS

  December 31,
2009
  December 31,
2008

Real estate, Investment Portfolio:

    

Accounted for using the operating method, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization

  $        2,329,827  $        2,373,878

Accounted for using the direct financing method

   31,317   31,240

Real estate, Inventory Portfolio, held for sale

   72,423   85,122

Investment in unconsolidated affiliate

   4,703   4,927

Mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable, net of allowance

   41,976   60,472

Commercial mortgage residual interests

   20,153   22,000

Cash and cash equivalents

   15,225   2,626

Receivables, net of allowance of $583 and $4,003, respectively

   1,946   3,612

Accrued rental income, net of allowance of $2,875 and $4,144, respectively

   25,745   23,972

Debt costs, net of accumulated amortization of $10,008 and $12,852, respectively

   13,884   11,342

Other assets

   33,763   30,280
        

Total assets

  $2,590,962  $2,649,471
        

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

    

Line of credit payable

  $-  $26,500

Mortgages payable

   25,290   26,290

Notes payable – convertible, net of unamortized discount of $18,355 and $25,413, respectively

   343,380   356,122

Notes payable, net of unamortized discount of $1,324 and $1,521, respectively

   618,676   618,479

Accrued interest payable

   7,471   7,608

Other liabilities

   29,283   45,526
        

Total liabilities

   1,024,100   1,080,525
        

Commitments and contingencies (Note 26)

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 15,000,000 shares

    

Series C, 3,680,000 depositary shares issued and outstanding, at stated liquidation value of $25 per share

   92,000   92,000

Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 190,000,000 shares; 82,427,560 and 78,340,428 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

   825   784

Excess stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 205,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding

   -   -

Capital in excess of par value

   1,408,491   1,337,018

Retained earnings

   62,413   134,644

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   511   2,414
        

Total stockholders’ equity of National Retail Properties, Inc.

   1,564,240   1,566,860

Noncontrolling interests

   2,622   2,086
        

Total equity

   1,566,862   1,568,946
        

Total liabilities and equity

  $2,590,962  $2,649,471
        

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

47


Table of Contents

 

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
    2009  2008  2007 

Revenues:

    

Rental income from operating leases

  $210,215   $206,477   $159,065  

Earned income from direct financing leases

   3,070    3,103    3,221  

Percentage rent

   1,340    1,104    1,383  

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

   8,387    7,012    5,591  

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

   4,535    5,804    5,268  

Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests

   4,252    4,636    4,882  
             
   231,799    228,136    179,410  
             

Disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio:

    

Gross proceeds

   953    4,900    1,750  

Costs

   (916  (4,879  (1,418
             

Gain

   37    21    332  
             

Retail operations:

    

Revenues

   15,595    -    -  

Operating expenses

   (15,176  -    -  
             

Net

   419    -    -  
             

Operating expenses:

    

General and administrative

   21,776    24,878    23,565  

Real estate

   13,684    10,007    7,805  

Depreciation and amortization

   46,769    44,181    31,340  

Impairment – real estate

   28,114    1,234    416  

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

   498    758    638  

Restructuring costs

   731    -    -  
             
   111,572    81,058    63,764  
             

Earnings from operations

   120,683    147,099    115,978  
             

Other expenses (revenues):

    

Interest and other income

   (1,375  (3,748  (4,751

Interest expense

   62,151    63,964    51,846  

Loss on interest rate hedge

   -    804    -  
             
   60,776    61,020    47,095  
             

Earnings from continuing operations before income tax benefit, equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate, loss on note receivable foreclosure and gain on extinguishment of debt

   59,907    86,079    68,883  

Income tax benefit

   1,126    7,178    8,300  

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate

   421    364    49  

Loss on note receivable foreclosure

   (7,196  -    -  

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   3,432    4,961    -  
             

Earnings from continuing operations

   57,690    98,582    77,232  

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations (Note 18):

    

Real estate, Investment Portfolio

   260    12,112    68,976  

Real estate, Inventory Portfolio, net of income tax expense

   (1,551  9,277    9,534  
             
   (1,291  21,389    78,510  
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

48


Table of Contents

 

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS – CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
    2009  2008  2007 

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

  $56,399   $119,971   $155,742  

Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests:

    

Continuing operations

   (1,542  109    156  

Discontinued operations

   (47  (2,927  (1,299
             
   (1,589  (2,818  (1,143
             

Net earnings attributable to National Retail Properties, Inc.

   54,810    117,153    154,599  

Other comprehensive income

   (1,903  1,688    (3,622
             

Total comprehensive income

  $52,907   $118,841   $150,977  
             

Net earnings attributable to National Retail Properties, Inc.

  $54,810   $117,153   $154,599  

Series C preferred stock dividends

   (6,785  (6,785  (6,785
             

Net earnings attributable to common stockholders

  $48,025   $110,368   $147,814  
             

Net earnings per share of common stock:

    

Basic:

    

Continuing operations

  $0.62   $1.23   $1.06  

Discontinued operations

   (0.02  0.25    1.17  
             

Net earnings

  $0.60   $1.48   $2.23  
             

Diluted:

    

Continuing operations

  $0.61   $1.23   $1.06  

Discontinued operations

   (0.01  0.25    1.16  
             

Net earnings

  $0.60   $1.48   $2.22  
             

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

    

Basic

   79,846,258    74,249,137    66,152,437  
             

Diluted

   79,953,499    74,344,231    66,263,980  
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

49


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Series A
  Preferred  
Stock
  Series C
Preferred
Stock
 Common
Stock
 Capital in
  Excess of  
Par Value
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
  Comprehensive  
Income
  Total
  Stockholders’  
Equity
    Noncontrolling  
Interests
  Total
Equity
 

Balances at December 31, 2006

 $        44,540   $        92,000 $        598 $        888,085   $        79,558   $                  4,698   $        1,109,479   $                  1,619   $        1,111,098  

Net earnings

  -    -  -  -    154,599    -    154,599    1,143    155,742  

Dividends declared and paid:

         

$1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

  -    -  -  -    (6,785  -    (6,785  -    (6,785

$1.40 per share of common stock

  -    -  6  13,947    (92,989  -    (79,036  -    (79,036

Redemption of 1,781,589 shares of Series A preferred stock

  (44,540  -  -  -    -    -    (44,540  -    (44,540

Issuance of common stock:

         

9,861,323 shares

  -    -  98  247,643    -    -    247,741    -    247,741  

2,054,805 shares – discounted stock purchase program

  -    -  21  49,006    -    -    49,027    -    49,027  

Issuance of 198,119 shares of restricted common stock

  -    -  2  (2  -    -    -    -    -  

Stock issuance costs

  -    -  -  (11,206  -    -    (11,206  -    (11,206

Amortization of deferred compensation

  -    -  -  2,091    -    -    2,091    -    2,091  

Interest rate hedge termination

  -    -  -  -    -    (3,119  (3,119  -    (3,119

Amortization of interest rate hedges

  -    -  -  -    -    (309  (309  -    (309

Unrealized loss – commercial mortgage residual interests

  -    -  -  -    -    (427  (427  101    (326

Stock value adjustment

  -    -  -  -    -    132    132    -    132  

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

  -    -  -  -    -    -    -    155    155  

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

  -    -  -  -    -    -    -    (62  (62
                                  

Balances at December 31, 2007

 $-   $92,000 $725 $1,189,564   $134,383   $975   $1,417,647   $2,956   $1,420,603  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

50


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY – CONTINUED

Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Series A
  Preferred  
Stock
 Series C
Preferred
Stock
 Common
Stock
 Capital in
  Excess of  
Par Value
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
  Comprehensive  
Income
  Total
  Stockholders’  
Equity
    Noncontrolling  
Interests
  Total
Equity
 

Balances at December 31, 2007

 $- $92,000 $725 $1,189,564   $134,383   $975   $1,417,647   $2,956   $1,420,603  

Net earnings

  -  -  -  -    117,153    -    117,153    2,818    119,971  

Dividends declared and paid:

         

$1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

  -  -  -  -    (6,785  -    (6,785  -    (6,785

$1.48 per share of common stock

  -  -  4  8,472    (110,107  -    (101,631  -    (101,631

Issuance of common stock:

         

3,523,285 shares

  -  -  35  80,633    -    -    80,668    -    80,668  

1,753,201 shares – discounted stock purchase program

  -  -  18  38,878    -    -    38,896    -    38,896  

Issuance of 217,397 shares of restricted common stock

  -  -  2  (2  -    -    -    -    -  

Stock issuance costs

  -  -  -  (3,582  -    -    (3,582  -    (3,582

Equity component of convertible debt

  -  -  -  20,467    -    -    20,467    -    20,467  

Amortization of deferred compensation

  -  -  -  2,588    -    -    2,588    -    2,588  

Interest rate hedge termination

  -  -  -  -    -    (162  (162  -    (162

Amortization of interest rate hedges

  -  -  -  -    -    (109  (109  -    (109

Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests

  -  -  -  -    -    1,760    1,760    249    2,009  

Stock value adjustment

  -  -  -  -    -    (50  (50  -    (50

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

  -  -  -  -    -    -    -    41    41  

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

  -  -  -  -    -     -    (5,483  (5,483

Other

  -  -  -  -    -    -    -    1,505    1,505  
                                 

Balances at December 31, 2008

 $        - $        92,000 $        784 $        1,337,018   $        134,644   $                  2,414   $        1,566,860   $                  2,086   $        1,568,946  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

51


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY – CONTINUED

Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Series A
  Preferred  
Stock
 Series C
Preferred
Stock
 Common
Stock
 Capital in
  Excess of  
Par Value
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
  Comprehensive  
Income
  Total
  Stockholders’  
Equity
    Noncontrolling  
Interests
  Total
Equity
 

Balances at December 31, 2008

 $- $92,000 $784 $1,337,018   $134,644   $2,414   $1,566,860   $2,086   $1,568,946  

Net earnings

  -  -  -  -    54,810    -    54,810    1,589    56,399  

Dividends declared and paid:

         

$1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

  -  -  -  -    (6,785  -    (6,785  -    (6,785

$1.50 per share of common stock

  -  -  1  1,797    (120,256  -    (118,458  -    (118,458

Issuance of common stock:

         

99,738 shares

  -  -  1  1,435    -    -    1,436    -    1,436  

3,664,182 shares – discounted stock purchase program

  -  -  36  65,519    -    -    65,555    -    65,555  

Issuance of 262,546 shares of restricted common stock

  -  -  3  (3  -    -    -    -    -  

Stock issuance costs

  -  -  -  (113  -    -    (113  -    (113

Equity component of extinguishment of convertible debt

  -  -  -  (795  -    -    (795  -    (795

Amortization of deferred compensation

  -  -  -  3,443    -    -    3,443    -    3,443  

Amortization of interest rate hedges

  -  -  -  -    -    (159  (159  -    (159

Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests

  -  -  -  -    -            (1,744  (1,744  104    (1,640

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

  -  -  -  -    -    -    -    152    152  

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

  -  -  -  -    -    -    -    (552  (552

Other

  -  -  -  190    -    -    190    (757  (567
                                 

Balances at December 31, 2009

 $                - $        92,000 $        825 $        1,408,491   $        62,413   $                        511   $        1,564,240   $                  2,622   $  1,566,862  
                                 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

52


Table of Contents

 

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2009  2008  2007 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

  $56,399   $119,971   $155,742  

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Stock compensation expense

   4,172    3,299    2,604  

Stock options expense – tax effect

   190    -    -  

Depreciation and amortization

   48,485    45,347    32,927  

Impairment – real estate

   34,514    5,660    1,970  

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation

   498    758    638  

Amortization of notes payable discount

   6,006    5,670    2,724  

Amortization of deferred interest rate hedges

   (159  (162  (309

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   (421  (364  (49

Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates

   607    439    30  

Gain on disposition of real estate, Investment Portfolio

   (2,392  (9,980  (56,625

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   (3,432  (4,961  -  

Loss on note receivable foreclosure

   7,196    -    -  

Gain on disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   (595  (12,665  (12,133

Deferred income taxes

   (16,649  (5,593  (4,590

Income tax valuation allowance

   14,900    -    -  

Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations:

    

Additions to real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   (2,457  (33,745  (165,160

Proceeds from disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   6,276    128,785    160,173  

Decrease in real estate leased to others using the direct financing method

   1,378    1,195    2,130  

Decrease (increase) in work in process

   (786  47    (4,217

Increase in mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable

   (10  (217  (301

Decrease in receivables

   941    243    3,924  

Increase in commercial mortgage residual interests

   (291  -    -  

Increase in accrued rental income

   (2,061  (978  (2,631

Decrease (increase) in other assets

   (172  951    3,615  

Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable

   (137  (3,635  5,254  

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

   (2,930  (1,463  4,510  

Increase (decrease) in current tax liability

   432    (1,143  (79
             

Net cash provided by operating activities

   149,502    237,459    130,147  
             

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Proceeds from the disposition of real estate, Investment Portfolio

   14,588    60,027    136,295  

Additions to real estate, Investment Portfolio:

    

Accounted for using the operating method

   (44,433  (352,618  (677,101

Investment in unconsolidated affiliate

   -    (901  (4,156

Increase in mortgages and notes receivable

   (959  (29,934  (44,888

Principal payments on mortgages and notes receivable

   4,009    64,589    19,862  

Cash received from commercial mortgage residual interests

   -    3,591    6,208  

Restricted cash

   -    -    36,587  

Payment of lease costs

   (451  (922  (2,912

Other

   (817  (136  (6,612
             

Net cash used in investing activities

   (28,063  (256,304  (536,717
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

53


Table of Contents

 

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
    2009  2008  2007 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Proceeds from line of credit payable

  $    132,400   $    516,000   $    662,300  

Repayment of line of credit payable

   (158,900  (619,300  (560,500

Repayment of mortgages payable

   (1,000  (1,190  (8,412

Proceeds from notes payable – convertible

   -    234,035    -  

Repurchase of notes payable – convertible – debt component

   (14,785  (18,420  -  

Repurchase of notes payable – convertible – equity component

   (795  (768  -  

Repayment of notes payable – secured

   -    (12,000  (33,300

Proceeds from notes payable

   -    -    249,122  

Repayment of notes payable

   -    (100,000  -  

Payment of interest rate hedge

   -    -    (3,228

Payment of debt costs

   (6,275  (5,813  (2,453

Repayment of financing lease obligation

   -    -    (26,007

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   68,060    127,328    310,208  

Redemption of 1,781,589 shares of Series A preferred stock

   -    -    (44,540

Payment of Series C preferred stock dividends

   (6,785  (6,785  (6,785

Payment of common stock dividends

   (120,256  (110,107  (92,989

Noncontrolling interest distributions

   (552  (5,483  (62

Noncontrolling interest contributions

   152    41    155  

Stock issuance costs

   (104  (3,566  (11,115
             

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   (108,840  (6,028  432,394  
             

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   12,599    (24,873  25,824  

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   2,626    27,499    1,675  
             

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $15,225   $2,626   $27,499  
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

54


Table of Contents

 

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
    2009  2008  2007 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

     

    Interest paid, net of amount capitalized

  $61,475   $69,395  $51,824  
             

    Taxes paid (received)

  $(63 $3,441  $1,375  
             

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:

     

Issued 262,546, 225,517 and 211,118 shares of restricted and unrestricted common stock in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan

  $4,290   $3,796  $4,323  
             

Issued 6,594, 12,766 and 7,750 shares of common stock in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, to directors pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan

  $118   $262  $182  
             

Issued 41,604, 26,879 and 16,346 shares of common stock in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, pursuant to NNN’s Deferred Director Fee Plan

  $611   $449  $331  
             

Surrender of 2,520 and 8,600 shares of restricted common stock in 2008 and 2007, respectively

  $-   $58  $182  
             

Change in other comprehensive income

  $(1,903 $1,439  $(3,723
             

Change in lease classification (direct financing lease to operating lease)

  $-   $300  $-  
             

Transfer of real estate from Inventory Portfolio to Investment Portfolio

  $16,058   $29,948  $14,845  
             

Note and mortgage receivable accepted in connection with real estate transactions

  $1,550   $24,245  $9,747  
             

Interest rate hedge

  $-   $-  $109  
             

Real estate acquired in connection with note receivable foreclosure

  $4,240   $2,497  $-  
             

Assets received in note receivable foreclosure

  $5,527   $-  $-  
             

Note receivable foreclosures

  $(17,013 $-  $-  
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

55


Table of Contents

 

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007

Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Organization and Nature of Business – National Retail Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries. These taxable subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable (including structured finance investments) on the consolidated balance sheets and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). NNN acquires, owns, invests in, manages and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 1,015 Investment Properties (including 12 properties with retail operations that NNN operates), with an aggregate gross leasable area of 11,373,000 square feet, located in 44 states. In addition, as of December 31, 2009, NNN’s Investment Assets included $41,976,000 in mortgages, notes and interest receivable (including structured finance investments) and $20,153,000 in commercial mortgage residual interests. The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). Inventory Assets typically consist of two types of properties, property for development and improved properties. As of December 31, 2009, NNN owned 19 Inventory Properties.

Principles of Consolidation – NNN’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of each of the respective majority owned and controlled affiliates, including transactions whereby NNN has been determined to be the primary beneficiary in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance included inConsolidation. All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated. NNN applies the equity method of accounting to investments in partnerships and joint ventures that are not subject to control by NNN due to the significance of rights held by other parties.

The TRS develops real estate through various joint venture development affiliate agreements. NNN consolidates the joint venture development entities listed in the table below based upon either NNN being the primary beneficiary of the respective variable interest entity or NNN having a controlling interest over the respective entity. NNN eliminates significant intercompany

 

56


Table of Contents

 

balances and transactions and records a noncontrolling interest for its other partners’ ownership percentage. The following table summarizes each of the investments as of December 31, 2009:

 

Date of Agreement

  

Entity Name

  TRS’
    Ownership %    

November 2002

  WG Grand Prairie TX, LLC  60%

February 2003

  Gator Pearson, LLC  50%

February 2006

  CNLRS BEP, L.P.  50%

February 2006

  CNLRS Rockwall, L.P.  50%

September 2006

  NNN Harrison Crossing, L.P.  50%

September 2006

  CNLRS RGI Bonita Springs, LLC  50%

In September 2007, NNN entered into a joint venture, NNN Retail Properties Fund I LLC (the “NNN Crow JV”) with an affiliate of Crow Holdings Realty Partners IV, LP.

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.

Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease – In accordance with the FASB guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired leased property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on the determination of the relative fair values of these assets. The as-if-vacant fair value of a property is provided to management by a qualified appraiser.

In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded as other assets or liabilities based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases, and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term.

The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, consisting of in-place leases, is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental rates over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as-if-vacant, determined as set forth above. The value of in-place leases exclusive of the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be written off.

The value of tenant relationships is reviewed on individual transactions to determine if future value was derived from the acquisition.

 

57


Table of Contents

 

Real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:

Operating method – Leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rentals vary during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.

Direct financing method – Leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio – The TRS acquires and/or develops and owns properties primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate. The properties that are classified as held for sale at any given time may consist of properties that have been acquired in the marketplace with the intent to sell and properties that have been, or are currently being, constructed by the TRS. The TRS records the acquisition of the real estate at cost, including the acquisition and closing costs. The cost of the real estate developed by the TRS includes direct and indirect costs of construction, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. In accordance with the FASB guidance included in Real Estate, the TRS classifies its real estate held for sale as discontinued operations for each property in which rental revenues are generated.

Impairment – Real Estate – Based upon events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market condition, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive price. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Real Estate Dispositions – When real estate is disposed of, the related cost, accumulated depreciation or amortization and any accrued rental income for operating leases and the net investment for direct financing leases are removed from the accounts and gains and losses from the dispositions are reflected in income. Gains from the disposition of real estate are generally recognized using the full accrual method in accordance with the FASB guidance included in Real Estate Sales, provided that various criteria relating to the terms of the sale and any subsequent involvement by NNN with the real estate sold are met. Lease termination fees are recognized when the related leases are cancelled and NNN no longer has a continuing obligation to provide services to the former tenants.

 

58


Table of Contents

 

Valuation of Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest – The allowance related to the mortgages, notes and accrued interest is NNN’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses. The allowance is determined on an individual note basis in reviewing any payment past due for over 90 days. Any outstanding amounts are written off against the allowance when all possible means of collection have been exhausted.

Investment in an Unconsolidated Affiliate – NNN accounts for its investment in an unconsolidated affiliate under the equity method of accounting.

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, at Fair Value – Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The commercial mortgage residual interests were acquired in connection with the acquisition of 78.9 percent equity interest of Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”). NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value.

Cash and Cash Equivalents – NNN considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and money market accounts. Cash equivalents are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.

Cash accounts maintained on behalf of NNN in demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds may exceed federally insured levels; however, NNN has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Valuation of Receivables – NNN estimates of the collectibility of its accounts receivable related to rents, expense reimbursements and other revenues. NNN analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, customer credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants in bankruptcy are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims.

Goodwill – Goodwill arises from business combinations and represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net fair value amounts that were assigned to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. In accordance with the FASB guidance included in Goodwill, NNN performs impairment testing on goodwill annually. The impairment test compares the fair value of goodwill to its carrying amount.

Debt Costs – Debt costs incurred in connection with NNN’s $400,000,000 line of credit and mortgages payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective loan commitment using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. Debt costs incurred in connection with the issuance of NNN’s notes payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective debt obligation using the effective interest method.

Revenue Recognition – Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance included in Leases, based on the terms of the lease at the time of acquisition of the leased asset. Rental revenues for properties under construction

 

59


Table of Contents

 

commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant.

Earnings Per Share – Earnings per share have been computed pursuant to the FASB guidance included in Earnings Per Share. Effective January 1, 2009, the guidance requires classification of the Company’s unvested restricted share units which contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends, as participating securities requiring the two-class method of computing earnings per share. Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In applying the two-class method, undistributed earnings are allocated to both common shares and participating securities based on the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. The following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share using the two-class method for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007 

Basic and Diluted Earnings:

    

Net earnings attributable to NNN

  $54,810   $117,153   $154,599  

Less: Series C preferred stock dividends

   (6,785  (6,785  (6,785
             

Net earnings available to NNN’s common stockholders

   48,025    110,368    147,814  

Less: Earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares

   (290  (485  (622
             

Net earnings used in basic earnings per share

   47,735    109,883    147,192  

Reallocated undistributed income (loss)

   (1  -    1  
             

Net earnings used in diluted earnings per share

  $47,734   $109,883   $147,193  
             

Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:

    

Weighted average number of shares outstanding

   80,486,215    74,732,844    66,519,519  

Less: Unvested restricted stock

   (639,957  (483,707  (367,082
             

Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share

   79,846,258    74,249,137    66,152,437  

Effects of dilutive securities:

    

Common stock options

   9,037    35,900    69,040  

Directors’ deferred fee plan

   98,204    59,194    42,503  
             

Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in diluted earnings per share

   79,953,499    74,344,231    66,263,980  
             

The potential dilutive shares related to convertible notes payable were not included in computing earnings per common share because their effects would be antidilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation – On January 1, 2006, NNN adopted the FASB guidance included in Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees, under the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized for all awards granted after the adoption of this standard and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that are outstanding as of that date. In accordance with the FASB guidance, NNN estimates the fair value of restricted stock and stock option grants at the date of grant and amortizes those amounts into expense on a straight line basis or amount vested, if greater, over the appropriate vesting period.

Income Taxes – NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and related regulations. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, providing it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.

 

60


Table of Contents

 

NNN and its taxable REIT subsidiaries have made timely TRS elections pursuant to the provisions of the REIT Modernization Act. A taxable REIT subsidiary is able to engage in activities resulting in income that previously would have been disqualified from being eligible REIT income under the federal income tax regulations. As a result, certain activities of NNN which occur within its TRS entities are subject to federal and state income taxes (See Note 17). All provisions for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are attributable to NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries and to OAMI’s built-in-gain tax liability.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method as required by the FASB guidance included in Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the temporary differences based on estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Fair Value Measurement – NNN’s estimates of fair value of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The framework specifies a hierarchy of valuation inputs which was established to increase consistency, clarity and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based upon three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, two of which are considered observable and one that is considered unobservable. The following describes the three levels:

 

  

Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

  

Level 2 – Valuation is based upon inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

  

Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

New Accounting Pronouncements – In January 2009, FASB issued new guidance on impairments included in Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. The new guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2008. Retroactive application was not permitted. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

Effective January 1, 2009, NNN adopted the new FASB guidance for the accounting of noncontrolling interests. The new guidance requires noncontrolling interests, previously called minority interest, to be presented as a component of equity. In addition, the guidance requires disclosure on the face of the consolidated statement of earnings of the amounts of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interests. The guidance was applied prospectively with the exception of presentation and disclosure requirements, which were applied retrospectively for all periods presented. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

 

61


Table of Contents

 

In April 2009, FASB issued additional application guidance and enhancements to disclosures regarding fair value measurements. The new guidance enhances consistency in financial reporting by increasing the frequency of fair value disclosures. The guidance also provides guidelines for making fair value measurements more consistent. The guidance was effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the guidance did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In April 2009, FASB issued revised guidance on the recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. The adoption of the guidance did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or result of operations.

In May 2009, FASB issued new guidance for accounting for subsequent events. The guidance establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The guidance provides, among other things, that companies should recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. The new guidance was effective for interim or annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of the guidance did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or result of operations.

In June 2009, FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (the “Codification”). The Codification reorganized existing U.S. accounting and reporting standards issued by the FASB and other related private sector standard setters into a single source of authoritative accounting principles arranged by topic. The Codification supersedes all existing U.S. accounting standards; all other accounting literature not included in the Codification (other than the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) guidance for publicly-traded companies) is considered non-authoritative. The Codification was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of the Codification changed the Company’s references to accounting standards under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) but did not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, FASB issued guidance on the accounting for the transfers of financial assets. The new guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. The new guidance is effective on a prospective basis for annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim and annual periods thereafter. The adoption of the standard will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, FASB issued revised guidance on the accounting for variable interest entities. The revised guidance reflects the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity. The guidance also replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation of the previous guidance for determining which company, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach that is primarily qualitative. The new guidance requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity as well as additional disclosures. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of the standard will not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

 

62


Table of Contents

 

In August 2009, FASB issued new guidance for the accounting for the fair value measurement of liabilities. The new guidance provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the approved techniques. The new guidance clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The guidance is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions to determine the potential impact, if any, the adoption will have on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards with change in Accounting Principles – Effective January 1, 2009, NNN adopted the new FASB guidance on accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion. The new guidance requires the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) was separately accounted for in a manner that reflects the issuer’s non-convertible debt borrowing rate. The debt component was recorded based upon the estimated fair value of non-convertible debt with similar terms. The resulting debt discount is amortized over the period during which the debt is outstanding as additional non-cash interest expense. This guidance required retrospective application, the effects of adopting such, has been reflected in all periods presented.

Effective January 1, 2009, NNN adopted the new FASB guidance on determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating securities, which also required retrospective application. The adoption of the guidance did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

Use of Estimates – Management of NNN has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant estimates include provision for impairment and allowances for certain assets, accruals, useful lives of assets and capitalization of costs. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassification – Certain items in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation. NNN transferred 11 properties from the Inventory Portfolio to the Investment Portfolio in December 2009. These reclassifications had no effect on stockholders’ equity or net earnings.

Note 2 – Real Estate – Investment Portfolio:

Leases – As of December 31, 2009, 984 of the Investment Property leases had been classified as operating leases, and 23 leases had been classified as direct financing leases. For the Investment Property leases classified as direct financing leases, the building portions of the property leases are accounted for as direct financing leases while the land portions of seven of these leases are accounted for as operating leases. Substantially all leases have initial terms of 10 to 20 years (expiring between 2010 and 2029) and provide for minimum rentals. In addition, the leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. Generally, the tenant is also required to pay all property taxes and assessments, substantially maintain the interior and exterior of the building and carry property and liability insurance coverage. Certain of NNN’s Investment Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for certain costs and expenses of the property. As of December 31, 2009, the weighted average remaining lease term was approximately 12 years. Generally, the leases of the Investment Properties provide the

 

63


Table of Contents

 

tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions as the initial lease.

Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Operating Method – Real estate subject to operating leases consisted of the following as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008 

Land and improvements

  $1,054,888   $1,063,419  

Buildings and improvements

   1,451,608    1,413,438  

Leasehold interests

   1,290    2,532  
         
   2,507,786    2,479,389  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (183,956  (146,296
         
   2,323,830    2,333,093  

Work in progress

   5,997    40,785  
         
  $2,329,827   $2,373,878  
         

Some leases provide for scheduled rent increases throughout the lease term. Such amounts are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, NNN recognized collectively in continuing and discontinued operations, $2,102,000, $1,020,000, and $2,672,000, respectively, of such income. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the balance of accrued rental income, net of allowances of $2,875,000 and $4,144,000, respectively, was $25,745,000 and $23,972,000, respectively.

In connection with the development of two Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction, land costs and tenant improvements) of $14,651,000. As of December 31, 2009, NNN had funded $12,261,000 of this commitment, with $2,390,000 remaining to be funded.

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on noncancellable operating leases at December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

 

2010

  $ 202,038

2011

   198,594

2012

   193,894

2013

   185,630

2014

   176,374

Thereafter

   1,574,516
    
  $    2,531,046
    

Since lease renewal periods are exercisable at the option of the tenant, the above table only presents future minimum lease payments due during the initial lease terms. In addition, this table does not include amounts for potential variable rent increases that are based on the CPI or future contingent rents which may be received on the leases based on a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales.

Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Direct Financing Method – The following lists the components of net investment in direct financing leases at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008 

Minimum lease payments to be received

  $42,244   $43,275  

Estimated unguaranteed residual values

   12,297    11,755  

Less unearned income

   (23,224  (23,790
         

Net investment in direct financing leases

  $    31,317   $    31,240  
         

 

64


Table of Contents

 

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on direct financing leases held for investment at December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

 

2010

  $ 4,545

2011

   4,531

2012

   4,558

2013

   4,508

2014

   3,750

Thereafter

   20,352
    
  $    42,244
    

The above table does not include future minimum lease payments for renewal periods, potential variable CPI rent increases or contingent rental payments that may become due in future periods (See Real Estate – Accounted for Using the Operating Method).

Note 3 – Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio:

As of December 31, 2009, the TRS owned 19 Inventory Properties: 13 completed inventory and six land parcels. As of December 31, 2008, the TRS owned 32 Inventory Properties: 24 completed inventory, one under construction and seven land parcels. The real estate Inventory Portfolio consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008 

Inventory:

   

Land

  $19,732   $20,238  

Building

   47,684    47,925  
         
   67,416    68,163  

Construction projects:

   

Land

   17,719    19,031  

Work in process

   (363  1,469  
         
   17,356    20,500  

Less impairment

   (12,349  (3,541
         
  $    72,423   $    85,122  
         

The following table summarizes the number of Inventory Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized on the disposition of Inventory Properties included in continuing and discontinued operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007 
   # of
Properties
  Gain  # of
Properties
  Gain  # of
Properties
  Gain 

Continuing operations

  2  $37   1  $21   2  $332  

Noncontrolling interest

     (14    (10    -  
                   

Total continuing operations attributable to NNN

     23      11      332  
                   

Discontinued operations

  2   527   24   12,315   69   10,957  

Intersegment eliminations

     31      329      844  

Noncontrolling interest

     -      (3,297    (1,120
                   

Total discontinued operations attributable to NNN

     558      9,347      10,681  
                      
  4  $    581   25  $    9,358   71  $    11,013  
                      

 

65


Table of Contents

 

Note 4 – Impairments – Real Estate:

Management periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive price. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. As a result of the Company’s review of long lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets, NNN recognized the following real estate impairments for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007

Continuing operations

  $28,114  $1,234  $416

Discontinued operations

   6,400   4,426   1,554
            
  $    34,514  $    5,660  $    1,970
            

The valuation of impaired assets is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis, income capitalization, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sales negotiations and bona fide purchase offers received from third parties. NNN may consider a single valuation technique or multiple valuation techniques, as appropriate, when measuring the fair value of its real estate.

The following table presents information about NNN’s impaired assets that were measured at fair value. The table indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized by NNN to determine the fair vale on a nonrecurring basis of such assets (dollars in thousands):

 

   Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Total  Total
Losses

Investment Portfolio

  $-  $8,203  $18,610  $26,813  $25,706

Inventory Portfolio

   -   45,369   -   45,369   8,808
                    
  $            -  $    53,572  $    18,610  $    72,182  $    34,514
                    

The Investment Portfolio is substantially comprised of assets held for use. NNN recorded an impairment charge related to 18 Investment Properties totaling $25,706,000, during the year ended December 31, 2009. The Inventory Portfolio is reported at lower of cost or fair value. During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded an impairment charge related to seven Inventory Properties totaling $8,808,000.

Note 5 – Business Combinations:

In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of NNN’s tenants, in June of 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties. The note foreclosure resulted in a loss of $7,816,000. NNN recorded the value of the assets received at fair value. No liabilities were assumed. The fair value of the assets resulted in goodwill of $3,400,000.

 

66


Table of Contents

 

Note 6 – Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest Receivable:

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Structured finance investments are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate. Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008 

Mortgages and notes receivable

  $41,707  $55,495  

Structured finance investments

   -   4,514  

Accrued interest receivables

   269   387  

Unamortized premium

   -   84  
         
   41,976   60,480  

Less loan origination fees, net

   -   (8
         
  $    41,976  $    60,472  
         

Note 7 – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests:

OAMI holds the commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven securitizations. The following table summarizes the investment interests in each of the transactions:

 

   Investment Interest

Securitization

  Company(1)  OAMI(2)  3rd Party

BYL 99-1

  -  59.0%  41.0%

CCMH I, LLC

  42.7%  57.3%  -

CCMH II, LLC

  44.0%  56.0%  -

CCMH III, LLC

  36.7%  63.3%  -

CCMH IV, LLC

  38.3%  61.7%  -

CCMH V, LLC

  38.4%  61.6%  -

CCMH VI, LLC

  -  100.0%  -

(1)     NNN owned these investment interests prior to its acquisition of the equity interest in OAMI.

(2)     NNN owns 78.9 percent of OAMI’s investment interest.

Each of the Residuals is recorded at fair value based upon an independent valuation. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. Due to changes in market conditions relating to residual assets, the independent valuation changed several valuation assumptions during the year: prepayment speeds, default curves and loss severity.

The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007

Unrealized gains

  $        -  $    2,009  $        -

Unrealized losses

       1,640   -   326

Other than temporary valuation impairment

   498   758   638

 

67


Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes the changes to the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of December 31:

 

   2009  2008

Discount rate

  25%  25%

Average life equivalent CPR speeds range

  14.5% to 20.7% CPR  31.7% to 39.4% CPR

Foreclosures:

    

    Frequency curve default model

  6% average rate  1.1% maximum rate

    Loss severity of loans in foreclosure

  20%  10%

Yield:

    

    LIBOR

  Forward 3-month curve  Forward 3-month curve

    Prime

  Forward curve  Forward curve

The following table shows the effects on the key assumptions affecting the fair value of the Residuals at December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

 

   Residuals

Carrying amount of retained interests

  $    20,153

Discount rate assumption:

  

    Fair value at 27% discount rate

  $19,474

    Fair value at 30% discount rate

  $18,523

Prepayment speed assumption:

  

    Fair value of 1% increases above the CPR Index

  $20,079

    Fair value of 2% increases above the CPR Index

  $20,065

Expected credit losses:

  

    Fair value 2% adverse change

  $19,748

    Fair value 3% adverse change

  $19,576

Yield Assumptions:

  

    Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 25 basis points

  $19,828

    Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 50 basis points

  $20,993

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation of a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumptions; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

Note 8 – Line of Credit Payable:

NNN’s $400,000,000 revolving credit facility had a weighted average outstanding balance of $10,824,000 and a weighted average interest rate of 1.19% during the year ended December 31, 2009. On November 3, 2009, NNN entered into a credit agreement for a new $400,000,000 revolving credit facility, replacing the existing revolving credit facility (as the context requires, the previous and new revolving credit facility, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures November 2012, with an option to extend maturity to November 2013. The Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 280 basis points with a 1.0% LIBOR floor; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN’s debt rating. The Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature for NNN to increase, at its option, the facility size up to $500,000,000. As of December 31, 2009, no balance was outstanding, and $400,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $653,000.

 

68


Table of Contents

 

In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) maximum leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage and (iv) investment and dividend limitations. At December 31, 2009, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

Note 9 – Mortgages Payable:

The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):

 

Entered

  Balance  Interest
Rate
  Maturity(3)  Carrying
Value of
Encumbered
Asset(s)
(1)
  Outstanding Principal
Balance at December 31,
          2009  2008

December 1999(4)

  $350  8.50%  December 2009  $-  $-  $49

December 2001(2)

   623  9.00%  April 2014   820   267   315

December 2001(2)

   698  9.00%  April 2019   1,247   392   418

December 2001(2)

   485  9.00%  April 2019   1,215   201   214

June 2002

   21,000  6.90%  July 2012   24,505   19,170   19,477

February 2004(2)

   6,952  6.90%  January 2017   11,764   4,554   5,036

March 2005(2)

   1,015  8.14%  September 2016   1,341   706   781
                  
        $       40,892  $    25,290  $    26,290
                  

 

 (1)

Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of NNN’s properties. The carrying values of the assets are as of December 31, 2009.

 (2)

Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan. The corresponding original principal balance represents the outstanding principal balance at the time of acquisition.

 (3)

Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.

 (4)

In December 2009, upon maturity NNN repaid the outstanding principal balance and the property was released from the mortgage lien. This was a self-amortizing mortgage.

The following is a schedule of the annual maturities of NNN’s mortgages payable at December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

 

2010

  $ 1,022

2011

   1,098

2012

   19,290

2013

   863

2014

   880

Thereafter

   2,137
    
  $25,290
    

 

69


Table of Contents

 

Note 10 – Notes Payable – Convertible:

Each of NNN’s outstanding series of convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

 

Terms

  2026
Notes(1)(2)(4)
  2028
Notes(2)(5)(6)
 

Issue Date

   September 2006    March 2008  

Net Proceeds

  $168,650   $228,576  

Stated Interest Rate(8)

   3.950%    5.125%  

Debt Issuance Costs

  $3,850(3)  $5,457  

Earliest Conversion Date

   September 2025    June 2027  

Earliest Put Option Date

   September 2011    June 2013  

Maturity Date

   September 2026    June 2028  

Original Principal

  $172,500   $234,035  

Repurchases

   (33,800  (11,000
         

Outstanding principal balance at December 31, 2009

  $138,700   $223,035  
         

 

 (1)

NNN repurchased $3,800, $5,000 and $25,000 in March 2009, January 2009 and November 2008, respectively, for a purchase price of $3,100, $3,894 and $19,188, respectively, resulting in a gain of $607, $958 and $4,961, respectively.

 (2)

Debt issuance costs include underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the period to the earliest put option date of the holders using the effective interest method.

 (3)

Includes $48, $66 and $349 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $3,800, $5,000 and $25,000 of the 2026 Notes, respectively.

 (4)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 41.6750 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $23.9952 per share of common stock.

 (5)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 39.3459 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $25.4156 per share of common stock.

 (6)

NNN repurchased $2,500 and $8,500 in May 2009 and February 2009, respectively, for a purchase price of $2,049 and $6,539, respectively, resulting in a gain of $342 and $1,525, respectively.

 (7)

Includes $48 and $171 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $2,500 and $8,500 of the 2028 Notes, respectively.

 (8)

With the adoption of the new accounting guidance on convertible debt securities, the effective interest rate for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes are 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively.

Each series of convertible notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of the Company. Each note is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through but not including the redemption date and (ii) the make whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

 

70


Table of Contents

 

Note 11 – Notes Payable:

Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands).

 

Notes

  

Issue Date

  Principal  Discount(3)  Net
Price
  Stated
Rate
  Effective
Rate
(4)
  

Maturity

Date

     

2010(1)

  September 2000  $    20,000  $            126  $    19,874  8.500%  8.595%  September 2010   

2012(1)

  June 2002   50,000   287   49,713  7.750%  7.833%  June 2012   

2014(1)(2)(5)

  June 2004   150,000   440   149,560  6.250%  5.910%  June 2014   

2015(1)

  November 2005   150,000   390   149,610  6.150%  6.185%  December 2015   

2017(1)(6)

  September 2007   250,000   877   249,123  6.875%  6.924%  October 2017   

 

 (1)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility.

 (2)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to repay the obligation of the 2004 Notes.

 (3)

The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.

 (4)

Includes the effects of the discount, treasury lock gain and swap gain (as applicable).

 (5)

NNN entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement which fixed a swap rate of 4.61% on a notional amount of $94,000. Upon issuance of the 2014 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting interest rate swap agreement resulting in a gain of $4,148. The gain has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2014 Notes using the effective interest method.

 (6)

NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of $3,260, of which $3,228 was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.

Each series of the notes represent senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. Each of the notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

In connection with the debt offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling $5,459,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.

In accordance with the terms of the indenture, pursuant to which NNN’s notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios and (ii) certain interest coverage. At December 31, 2009, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

Note 12 – Preferred Stock:

The following table outlines each issuance of NNN’s preferred stock (dollars in thousands):

 

Non-Voting Preferred Stock Issuance

  Shares
Outstanding
At
December 31,
2009
  Liquidation
Preference
(per share)
  Fixed Annual
Cash
Distribution
(per share)

9% Series A

  -  $            25.00  $        2.25000

7.375% Series C Redeemable Depositary Shares

  3,680,000   25.00   1.84375

9% Non-Voting Series A Preferred Stock.  In December 2001, NNN issued 1,999,974 shares of 9% Non-Voting Series A Preferred Stock (the “Series A Preferred Stock”). Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the board of directors, cumulative preferential cash distributions at a rate of nine percent of the $25.00 liquidation

 

71


Table of Contents

 

preference per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $2.25 per share). The Series A Preferred Stock ranked senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to distribution rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN.

In January 2007, NNN redeemed all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.00 per share, plus all accumulated and unpaid distributions through the redemption date of $0.20625 per share.

7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.  In October 2006, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 3,200,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and received gross proceeds of $80,000,000. In addition, NNN issued an additional 480,000 depositary shares in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received gross proceeds of $12,000,000. In connection with this offering NNN incurred stock issuance costs of approximately $3,098,000, consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

Holders of the depositary shares are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 7.375% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per depositary share per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $1.84375 per depositary share). The Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares ranks senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. NNN may redeem the Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares on or after October 12, 2011, for cash, at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends.

Note 13 – Common Stock:

In March 2007, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $24.70 per share and received net proceeds of $118,020,000. Subsequently, in April 2007, NNN issued an additional 750,000 shares of common stock in connection with the underwriters’ over-allotment option and received net proceeds of $17,730,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $6,217,000, consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

In June 2007, NNN filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Commission which permits the issuance by NNN of up to 5,900,000 shares of common stock pursuant to NNN’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan.

In October 2007, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock at a price of $25.94 per share and received net proceeds of $99,150,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $4,874,000, consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

In October 2008, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 3,450,000 shares (including 450,000 shares in connection with the underwriters’ over allotment) of common stock at a price of $23.05 per share and received net proceeds of $75,958,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $3,565,000, consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, and legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

 

72


Table of Contents

 

In February 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission which permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.  In June 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission for its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”) which permits the issuance by NNN of 16,000,000 shares of common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the DRIP for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007

Shares of common stock

       3,766,452       2,146,640       2,645,257

Net proceeds

  $67,354  $47,372  $62,980

Note 14 – Employee Benefit Plan:

Effective January 1, 1998, NNN adopted a defined contribution retirement plan (the “Retirement Plan”) covering substantially all of the employees of NNN. The Retirement Plan permits participants to defer up to a maximum of 60 percent of their compensation, as defined in the Retirement Plan, subject to limits established by the Code. NNN matches 60 percent of the participants’ contributions up to a maximum of eight percent of a participant’s annual compensation. NNN’s contributions to the Retirement Plan for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 totaled $302,000, $385,000, and $428,000, respectively.

Note 15 – Dividends:

The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of common stock dividends paid to stockholders for the years ended December 31:

 

      2009         2008         2007    

Ordinary dividends

 $1.495182 $1.480000 $1.397402

Qualified dividends

  -  -  0.000414

Capital gain

  0.003051  -  0.002184

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

  0.001767  -  -
         
 $    1.500000 $    1.480000 $    1.400000
         

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, NNN declared and paid dividends to its common shareholders of $120,256,000, $110,107,000 and $92,989,000, respectively, or $1.50, $1.48 and $1.40, respectively per share, respectively, of common stock.

On January 15, 2010, NNN declared a dividend of $0.375 per share, which is payable February 15, 2010 to its common stockholders of record as of January 29, 2010.

 

73


Table of Contents

 

The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of preferred stock dividends per share paid to stockholders for the year ended December 31:

 

   Total  Ordinary
Dividends
  Qualified
Dividends
  Capital Gain  Unrecaptured
Section 1250
Gains

2009:

          

    Series C

  $    1.843750  $    1.837828  $-  $0.00375  $    0.002172

2008:

          

    Series C

   1.843750   1.843750   -   -   -

2007:

          

    Series A(1)

   0.206250   0.205867       0.000061       0.000322   -

    Series C

   1.843750   1.840328   0.000546   0.002876   -

 

 (1)

Shares of Series A are no longer outstanding.

NNN declared and paid dividends to its Series C Preferred stockholders of $6,785,000 or $1.84375 per depository share during each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.

Note 16 – Restructuring Costs:

During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $731,000, related to the reduction of its workforce in January 2009.

Note 17 – Income Taxes:

In June 2006, the FASB issued guidance, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements in accordance with FASB guidance included inIncome Taxes. The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

NNN is subject to the provisions of the FASB guidance as of January 1, 2007, and has analyzed its various federal and state filing positions. NNN believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions are well documented and supported. Additionally, NNN believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to the FASB guidance. In addition, NNN did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of the FASB guidance.

NNN has had no increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits for current or prior years since the date of adoption. Further, no interest or penalties have been included since no reserves were recorded and no significant increases or decreases are expected to occur within the next 12 months. When applicable, such interest and penalties will be recorded in non-operating expenses. The periods that remain open under federal statute are 2006 through 2009. NNN also files in many states with varying open years under statute.

NNN incurred a new deferred income tax item as a result of NNN taking over the operations of the 12 auto service businesses. See Note 5 – Business Combinations. The new deferred tax item is goodwill. The amount of the tax deductible goodwill is approximately $11,216,000. It is amortized for tax purposes using a straight-line method, over 15 years, beginning with the month incurred.

 

74


Table of Contents

 

For income tax purposes, NNN has taxable REIT subsidiaries in which certain real estate activities are conducted. Additionally, in May 2005, NNN acquired a 78.9 percent equity interest in OAMI, and has consolidated OAMI in its financial statements. OAMI, upon making its REIT election, has remaining tax liabilities relating to the built-in gain of its assets.

NNN treats some depreciation expense and certain other items differently for tax than for financial reporting purposes. The principal differences between NNN’s effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, and the statutory rates relate to state taxes and nondeductible expenses such as meals and entertainment expenses.

The components of the net income tax asset consist of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008 

Temporary differences:

   

    Built-in gain

  $(4,731 $(5,195

    Depreciation

   (385  (723

    Other

   1,992    (332

    Reserves

   10,892    1,894  

    Goodwill

   2,801    -  

    Excess interest expense carryforward

   5,678    5,721  

    Net operating loss carryforward

   4,484    2,717  
         

Net deferred income tax asset

  $20,731   $4,082  

    Current income tax asset

   551    982  
         

Subtotal: Income tax asset

   21,282    5,064  

    Valuation allowance

   (14,900  -  
         

Income tax asset

  $6,382   $5,064  
         

In assessing the ability to realize a deferred tax asset, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The net operating loss carryforwards were generated by NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries. The net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2027. Based upon the level of historical taxable income, projections for future taxable income, and tax strategies available to NNN over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes, with the exception of certain impairments and losses, it is more likely than not that NNN will realize all of the benefits of these deductible differences that existed as of December 31, 2009. NNN believes it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain impairment charges and losses will not be realized. In recognition of this risk, NNN has provided a valuation allowance of $14,900,000 on the deferred tax assets relating to the impairments and losses. The income tax benefit consists of the following components for the years ended December 31 (as adjusted) (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007 

Net earnings before income taxes

  $    53,930   $    113,859   $    151,338  

Provision for income tax benefit (expense):

    

Current:

    

Federal

   (419  (1,936  (1,120

State and local

   (79  (364  (209

Deferred:

    

Federal

   1,110    4,539    3,570  

State and local

   268    1,055    1,020  
             

Total benefit for income taxes

   880    3,294    3,261  
             

Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders

  $54,810   $117,153   $154,599  
             

 

75


Table of Contents

 

Note 18 – Earnings from Discontinued Operations:

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – NNN classified the revenues and expenses related to (i) all Investment Properties that were sold and leasehold interests which expired, and (ii) all Investment Properties that were held for sale as of December 31, 2009, as discontinued operations. The following is a summary of the earnings from discontinued operations from the Investment Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007 

Revenues:

    

Rental income from operating leases

  $    3,826   $    4,513   $    11,492  

Earned income from direct financing leases

   -    100    2,695  

Percentage rent

   -    25    189  

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

   182    176    479  

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

   121    434    437  
             
   4,129    5,248    15,292  
             

Operating expenses:

    

General and administrative

   4    (74  (42

Real estate

   742    520    755  

Depreciation and amortization

   1,209    940    1,518  

Impairments – real estate

   4,306    1,730    710  
             
   6,261    3,116    2,941  
             

Earnings (loss) before gain on disposition of real estate

   (2,132  2,132    12,351  

Gain on disposition of real estate

   2,392    9,980    56,625  
             

Earnings from discontinued operations attributable to NNN

  $260   $12,112   $68,976  
             

 

76


Table of Contents

 

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio – NNN has classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses related to (i) Inventory Properties which generated rental revenues prior to disposition, and (ii) Inventory Properties which generated rental revenues and were held for sale as of December 31, 2009. The following is a summary of the earnings from discontinued operations from the Inventory Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2009  2008  2007 

Revenues:

    

Rental income from operating leases

  $4,975   $8,646   $7,971  

Percentage rent

   -    139    -  

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

   1,513    867    976  

Interest and other from real estate transactions

   141    561    224  
             
   6,629    10,213    9,171  
             

Disposition of real estate:

    

Gross proceeds

   5,402    151,713    164,338  

Costs

   (4,844      (139,069      (152,537
             

Gain

   558    12,644    11,801  
             

Operating expenses:

    

General and administrative

   116    22    53  

Real estate

   2,169    1,468    1,511  

Depreciation and amortization

   323    226    68  

Impairments – real estate

   2,094    2,696    844  
             
   4,702    4,412    2,476  
             

Other expenses (revenues):

    

Interest and other income

   -    (8  (5

Interest expense

   3,790    5,291    3,928  
             
   3,790    5,283    3,923  
             

Earnings (loss) before income tax expense

   (1,305  13,162    14,573  

Income tax expense

   246    3,885    5,039  
             

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations including noncontrolling interests

   (1,551  9,277    9,534  

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests

   (47  (2,927  (1,299
             

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to NNN

  $    (1,598 $6,350   $8,235  
             

Note 19 – Derivatives:

In accordance with the guidance on derivatives and hedging, NNN records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

NNN’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, NNN primarily uses treasury locks and interest rate swaps as part of its cash flow hedging strategy. Treasury locks designated as cash flow hedges lock in the yield or price of a treasury security. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable rate amounts in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying principal amount. To date, such derivatives have been used to hedge the variable cash

 

77


Table of Contents

 

flows associated with floating rate debt and forecasted interest payments of a forecasted issuance of debt.

For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings.

NNN discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, the derivative is re-designated as a hedging instrument or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, NNN continues to carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, and recognizes any changes in its fair value in earnings or may choose to cash settle the derivative at that time.

In February 2008, NNN terminated its interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000,000 that was hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate hedge when terminated was a liability of $804,000, which NNN recorded as a loss on interest rate hedge.

In September 2007, NNN terminated two interest rate hedges with a combined notional amount of $100,000,000 that were hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate hedges when terminated was a liability of $3,260,000, of which $3,228,000 was deferred in other comprehensive income.

In June 2004, NNN terminated its forward-starting interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $94,000,000 that was hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate swaps when terminated was an asset of $4,148,000, which was deferred in other comprehensive income.

As of December 31, 2009, $549,000 remains in other comprehensive income related to the fair value of the interest rate hedges. During the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, NNN reclassed $159,000, $162,000 and $309,000, respectively, out of other comprehensive income as a reduction to interest expense. During 2010, NNN estimates that an additional $165,000 will be reclassified in interest expense. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on NNN’s long-term debt.

NNN does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes or currently have any derivatives that are not designated as hedges. NNN had no derivative financial instruments outstanding at December 31, 2009.

 

78


Table of Contents

 

Note 20 – Performance Incentive Plan:

In June 2007, NNN filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Commission which permits the issuance of up to 5,900,000 shares of common stock pursuant to NNN’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan replaces NNN’s previous Performance Incentive Plan. The 2007 Plan allows NNN to award or grant to key employees, directors and persons performing consulting or advisory services for NNN or its affiliates, stock options, stock awards, stock appreciation rights, Phantom Stock Awards, Performance Awards and Leveraged Stock Purchase Awards, each as defined in the 2007 Plan.

The following summarizes NNN’s stock-based compensation activity for each of the years ended December 31:

 

   Number of Shares 
   2009  2008  2007 

Outstanding, January 1

  77,004   118,804   236,371  

Options granted

  -   -   -  

Options exercised

  (51,500 (28,000 (82,767

Options surrendered

  (13,350 (13,800 (34,800
          

Outstanding, December 31

  12,154   77,004   118,804  
          

Exercisable, December 31

  12,154   77,004   118,804  
          

The following represents the weighted average option exercise price information for each of the years ended December 31:

 

   2009  2008  2007

Outstanding, January 1

  $    14.00  $    13.64  $    14.92

Granted during the year

   -   -   -

Exercised during the year

   13.72   11.17   16.12

Outstanding, December 31

   13.72   14.00   13.64

Exercisable, December 31

   13.72   14.00   13.64

The following summarizes the outstanding options and the exercisable options at December 31, 2009:

 

  Total

Outstanding options:

 

Number of shares

  12,154

Weighted-average exercise price

 $13.72

Weighted-average remaining contractual life in years

  2.4

Exercisable options:

 

Number of shares

  12,154

Weighted-average exercise price

 $        13.72

One-third of the option grant to each individual becomes exercisable at the end of each of the first three years of service following the date of the grant and the options’ maximum term is 10 years. At December 31, 2009, the intrinsic value of options outstanding was $117,000. All options outstanding at December 31, 2009, were exercisable. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, NNN received proceeds totaling $707,000, $313,000 and $1,334,000, respectively, in connection with the exercise of options. NNN issued new common stock to satisfy share option exercises. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, was $240,000, $327,000 and $664,000, respectively.

 

79


Table of Contents

 

Pursuant to the 2007 Plan, NNN has granted and issued shares of restricted stock to certain officers, directors and key associates of NNN. The following summarizes the activity for the year ended December 31, 2009, of such grants.

 

   Number
of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Share Price

Non-vested restricted shares, January 1

  508,840   $        18.24

Restricted shares granted

  262,546    16.34

Restricted shares vested

  (103,376  21.77

Restricted shares forfeited

  -   
     

Non-vested restricted shares, December 31

  668,010   $16.95
     

During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, NNN cancelled 2,520 and 8,600 forfeited shares, respectively, of restricted stock. No shares were cancelled in 2009.

Compensation expense for the restricted stock which is not tied to performance goals is determined based upon the fair value at the date of grant, assuming a 1.3% forfeiture rate, and is recognized as the greater of the amount amortized over a straight lined basis or the amount vested over the vesting periods. Vesting periods for officers and key associates of NNN range from four to seven years and generally vest yearly on a straight line basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2007, NNN granted 79,000 performance based shares with a weighted average grant price of $12.94 to certain executive officers of NNN. The compensation expense for the grant is based upon the fair value of the grant calculated by a third party using a lattice model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free interest rate of 4.80%, (ii) a dividend rate of 5.30%, (iii) a term of five years, and (iv) volatility of 17.50%. Volatility is based upon the historical volatility of NNN’s stock and other factors. The term is assumed to be the vesting date for each tranche. The vesting of these shares is contingent upon achievement of certain performance goals by January 1, 2012.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, NNN granted 81,330 performance based shares with a weighted average grant price of $8.00 to certain executive officers of NNN. The compensation expense for the grant is based upon fair market value of the grant calculated by a third party using a lattice model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free rate of 3.48%, (ii) a dividend rate of 6.50%, (iii) a term of five years, and (iv) a volatility of 19.89%. Volatility is based upon the historical volatility of NNN’s stock and other factors. The vesting of these shares is contingent upon the achievement of certain performance goals by January 1, 2013.

The following summarizes other grants made during the year ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to the 2007 Plan.

 

  Shares  Weighted
Average
  Share Price  

Other share grants under the 2007 Plan:

   

Directors’ fees

 6,594  $          17.89

Deferred Directors’ fees

 41,604   17.95
    
 48,198  $17.94
    

Shares available under the 2007 Plan for grant, end of period

 5,272,513  
    

The total compensation cost for share-based payments for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, totaled $4,172,000, $3,341,000 and $2,583,000, respectively, of such

 

80


Table of Contents

 

compensation expense. At December 31, 2009, NNN had $7,149,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements under the 2007 Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years.

Note 21 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

NNN believes the carrying value of its Credit Facility approximates fair value based upon its nature, terms and variable interest rate. NNN believes that the carrying value of its cash and cash equivalents, mortgages, notes and other receivables, mortgages payable and other liabilities at December 31, 2009 and 2008, approximate fair value based upon current market prices of similar issues. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the carrying value and fair value of NNN’s notes payable and convertible notes payable, collectively, was $987,275,000 and $709,944,000, respectively, based upon the quoted market price.

Note 22 – Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited):

The following table outlines NNN’s quarterly financial data (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

 

2009

  First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 

Revenues as originally reported

  $    57,963   $    58,681   $    57,035  $    57,750  

Reclassified to discontinued operations

   367    (297  301   -  
                 

Adjusted revenue

  $58,330   $58,384   $57,336  $57,750  
                 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to NNN’s stockholders

  $26,804   $26,954   $22,443  $(21,391
                 

Net earnings (loss) per share(1):

      

Basic

  $0.32   $0.32   $0.26  $(0.28

Diluted

   0.32    0.32    0.26   (0.28

2008

             

Revenues as originally reported

  $55,200   $57,026   $58,573  $57,244  

Reclassified to discontinued operations

   (878  (81  841   210  
                 

Adjusted revenue

  $54,322   $56,945   $59,414  $57,454  
                 

Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders

  $32,239   $29,266   $28,766  $26,882  
                 

Net earnings per share(1):

      

Basic

  $0.42   $0.38   $0.37  $0.32  

Diluted

   0.42    0.38    0.37   0.32  

(1)    Calculated independently for each period and consequently, the sum of the quarters may differ from the annual amount.

        

 

81


Table of Contents

 

Note 23 – Segment Information:

NNN has identified two primary financial segments: (i) Investment Assets, and (ii) Inventory Assets. The following tables represent the segment data and reconciliation to NNN’s consolidated totals for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 (as adjusted) (dollars in thousands):

 

2009

      Investment    
Assets
      Inventory    
Assets
      Eliminations    
(Intercompany)
      Consolidated    
Totals
 

External revenues

  $224,083   $193   $-   $224,276  

Intersegment revenues

   3,035    1,042    (4,077  -  

Interest revenue

   4,615    31    -    4,646  

Interest revenue on Residuals

   4,252    -    -    4,252  

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   -    5    32    37  

Retail operations, net

   419    -    -    419  

Interest expense

   66,018    188    (4,055  62,151  

Depreciation and amortization

   46,759    10    -    46,769  

Operating expenses

   30,382    5,078    -    35,460  

Impairments – real estate

   21,401    6,713    -    28,114  

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

   498    -    -    498  

Restructuring costs

   731    -    -    731  

Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated affiliate

   (12,280  -    12,701    421  

Loss on note receivable foreclosure

   (7,196  -    -    (7,196

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   3,432    -    -    3,432  

Income tax benefit

   495    631    -    1,126  
                 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

   55,066    (10,087  12,711    57,690  

Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

   260    (1,551  -    (1,291
                 

Earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests

   55,326    (11,638  12,711    56,399  

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations

   (516  (1,026  -    (1,542

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations

   -    (47  -    (47
                 

Net earnings attributable to NNN

  $54,810   $(12,711 $12,711   $54,810  
                 

Assets

  $        2,588,408   $        237,715   $            (235,161 $          2,590,962  
                 

Additions to long-lived assets:

     

Real estate

  $44,433   $2,457   $-   $46,890  
                 

 

82


Table of Contents

 

2008

      Investment    
Assets
      Inventory    
Assets
      Eliminations    
(Intercompany)
      Consolidated    
Totals
 

External revenues

  $218,692   $176   $-   $218,868  

Intersegment revenues

   12,727    606    (13,333  -  

Interest revenue

   8,351    28    -    8,379  

Interest revenue Residuals

   4,636    -    -    4,636  

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   -    (308  329    21  

Interest expense

   69,763    7,442    (13,241  63,964  

Depreciation and amortization

   44,139    42    -    44,181  

Operating expenses

   25,347    9,538    -    34,885  

Impairments – real estate

   1,234    -    -    1,234  

Impairments – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

   758    -    -    758  

Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated affiliates

   (2,785  -    3,149    364  

Loss on derivative instrument

   (804  -    -    (804

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   4,961    -    -    4,961  

Income tax benefit

   1,331    5,848    -    7,179  
                 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

   105,868    (10,672  3,386    98,582  

Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

   12,112    9,277    -    21,389  
                 

Earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests

   117,980    (1,395  3,386    119,971  

Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations

   (827  936    -    109  

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations

   -    (2,927  -    (2,927
                 

Net earnings attributable to NNN

  $117,153   $(3,386 $3,386   $117,153  
                 

Assets

  $        2,650,040   $        128,916   $            (129,485 $          2,649,471  
                 

Additions to long-lived assets:

     

Real estate

  $352,618   $33,745   $-   $386,363  
                 

 

83


Table of Contents

 

2007

      Investment    
Assets
      Inventory    
Assets
      Eliminations    
(Intercompany)
      Consolidated    
Totals
 

External revenues

  $170,054   $327   $-   $170,381  

Intersegment revenues

   15,851    -    (15,851  -  

Interest revenue

   8,858    40    -    8,898  

Interest revenue on Residuals

   4,882    -    -    4,882  

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   -    (512  844    332  

Interest expense

   58,193    8,502    (14,849  51,846  

Depreciation and amortization

   31,232    108    -    31,340  

Operating expenses

   23,733    7,637    -    31,370  

Impairments – real estate

   288    128    -    416  

Impairments – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

   638    -    -    638  

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   (1,700  -    1,749    49  

Income tax benefit

   2,451    5,849    -    8,300  
                 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

   86,312    (10,671  1,591    77,232  

Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

   68,976    9,534    -    78,510  
                 

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

   155,288    (1,137  1,591    155,742  

Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations

   (689  845    -    156  

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations

   -    (1,299  -    (1,299
                 

Net earnings attributable to NNN

  $154,599   $(1,591 $1,591   $154,599  
                 

Assets

  $        2,519,428   $        263,368   $            (243,124 $          2,539,672  
                 

Additions to long-lived assets:

     

Real estate

  $677,101   $165,160   $-   $842,261  
                 

Note 24 – Fair Value Measurements:

NNN currently values its Residuals based upon an independent valuation which provides a discounted cash flow analysis based upon prepayment speeds, expected loan losses and yield curves. These valuation inputs are generally considered unobservable; therefore, the Residuals are considered Level 3 financial assets. The table below presents a reconciliation of the Residuals during the year ended December 31, 2009 (dollars in thousands):

 

Balance at beginning of period

  $22,000  

Total gains (losses) – realized/unrealized:

  

Included in earnings

   (498

Included in other comprehensive income

   (1,640

Interest income on Residuals

   4,252  

Cash received from Residuals

   (3,961

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net

   -  

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

   -  
     

Balance at end of period

  $    20,153  
     

Changes in gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to a change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the end of period

  $9  
     

 

84


Table of Contents

 

Note 25 – Major Tenants:

As of December 31, 2009, NNN did not have any tenant that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental and earned income.

Note 26 – Commitments and Contingencies:

As of December 31, 2009, NNN had letters of credit totaling $653,000 outstanding under its Credit Facility.

In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various other legal actions which management believes is routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Note 27 – Subsequent Events:

NNN reviewed all subsequent events and transactions that have occurred after December 31, 2009, the date of the consolidated balance sheet, through February 25, 2010, the date of filing this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other than included herein, there were no subsequent events or transactions.

 

85


Table of Contents

 

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Process for Assessment and Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financing Reporting.

NNN carried out an assessment as of December 31, 2009, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting. This assessment was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) require NNN to present the conclusions of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer about the effectiveness of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the conclusions of NNN’s management about the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

CEO and CFO Certifications.  Included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forms of “Certification” of NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The forms of Certification are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K that stockholders are currently reading is the information concerning the assessment referred to in the Section 302 certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in NNN’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to NNN’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and affected by NNN’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

  

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of NNN’s assets;

 

  

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that NNN’s receipts and expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of management or the Board of Directors; and

 

  

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of NNN’s assets that could have a material adverse effect on NNN’s financial statements.

 

86


Table of Contents

 

Scope of the Assessments.  The assessment by NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the assessment by NNN’s management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting included a review of procedures and discussions with NNN’s management and others at NNN. In the course of the assessments, NNN sought to identify data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, were being undertaken.

NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is also assessed on an ongoing basis by personnel in NNN’s Accounting department and by NNN’s internal auditors in connection with their internal audit activities. The overall goals of these various assessment activities are to monitor NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting and to make modifications as necessary. NNN’s intent in this regard is that the disclosure controls and procedures and the internal control over financial reporting will be maintained and updated (including with improvements and corrections) as conditions warrant. Management also sought to deal with other control matters in the assessment, and in each case if a problem was identified, management considered what revision, improvement and/or correction was necessary to be made in accordance with NNN’s on-going procedures. The assessments of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is done on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning effectiveness of those controls can be reported in NNN’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Assessment of Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for NNN. Management used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework to assess the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting. Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2009, NNN’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Ernst & Young LLP, NNN’s independent registered public accounting firm, audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has issued an attestation report on NNN’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During the three months ended December 31, 2009, there were no changes in NNN’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, NNN’s internal control for financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls.

Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures or NNN’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of

 

87


Table of Contents

 

controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within NNN have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management’s override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Item 9B.  Other Information

None.

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Nominees,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Executive Officers,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Code of Business Conduct” and “Security Ownership,” and the information in such sections is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Compensation of Directors,” “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information,” and “Security Ownership,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and the information in such section is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Audit Committee Report” and “Proposal II: Proposal to Ratify Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

 

88


Table of Contents

 

PART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report.

 

(1)  FinancialStatements   
  Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  45
  Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008  47
  Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007  48
  Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007  50
  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007  53
  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  56
(2)  

FinancialStatement Schedules

  
  Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization and Notes as of December 31, 2009  
  Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate and Notes as of December 31, 2009  

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

 

 (3)Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report.

 

 3.Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

 

 3.1First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 3.2Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 11, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 3.3

Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference; second amendment filed as Exhibit 3.1 to

 

89


Table of Contents

 

 

the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

 

 4.1Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.2Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.3Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated September 20, 2000, by and among Registrant and First Union National Bank, Trustee, relating to $20,000,000 of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.4Form of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.5Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of May 30, 2002, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $50,000,000 of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.6Form of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.7Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated as of June 18, 2004, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.8Form of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

90


Table of Contents

 

 4.9Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.10Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.11Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2006, between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.12Form of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.13Specimen certificate representing the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.14Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.15Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.16Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.17Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

91


Table of Contents

 

 4.18Form of 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.Material Contracts

 

 10.12007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.2Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.3Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.4Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.5Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.6Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.7Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.8Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.9Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated December 13, 2005, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

92


Table of Contents

 

 10.10First Amendment to Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated February 20, 2007, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.11Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2009, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 12.Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).

 

 21.Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).

 

 23.Consent of Independent Accountants

 

 23.1Ernst & Young LLP dated February 25, 2010 (filed herewith).

 

 24.Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

 

 31.Section 302 Certifications

 

 31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 32.Section 906 Certifications

 

 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 99.Additional Exhibits

 

 99.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).

 

93


Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 25th day of February, 2010.

 

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

By:

   /s/ Craig Macnab
   Craig Macnab
   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints each of Craig Macnab and Kevin B. Habicht as his attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this report and to file same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, granting unto such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

/s/ Craig Macnab

Craig Macnab

  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) February 25, 2010

/s/ Ted B. Lanier

Ted B. Lanier

  Lead Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Don DeFosset

Don DeFosset

  Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Dennis E. Gershenson

Dennis E. Gershenson

  Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Richard B. Jennings

Richard B. Jennings

  Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Robert C. Legler

Robert C. Legler

  Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Robert Martinez

Robert Martinez

  Director February 25, 2010

/s/ Kevin B. Habicht

Kevin B. Habicht

  Director, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), Executive Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Treasurer February 25, 2010

 

94


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

 

3.Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

 

 3.1First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 3.2Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 11, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 3.3Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference; second amendment filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

4.Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

 

 4.1Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.2Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.3Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated September 20, 2000, by and among Registrant and First Union National Bank, Trustee, relating to $20,000,000 of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.4Form of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.5Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of May 30, 2002, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $50,000,000 of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

95


Table of Contents
 4.6Form of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.7Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated as of June 18, 2004, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.8Form of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.9Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.10Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.11Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2006, between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.12Form of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.13Specimen certificate representing the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.14Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

96


Table of Contents

 

 4.15Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.16Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.17Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.18Form of 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

10.Material Contracts

 

 10.12007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.2Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.3Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.4Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.5Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

97


Table of Contents
 10.6Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.7Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.8Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.9Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated December 13, 2005, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.10First Amendment to Eighth Amended and Restated Line of Credit and Security Agreement, dated February 20, 2007, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wachovia Bank, N.A., as the Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 21, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.11Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2009, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

12.Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).

 

21.Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).

 

23.Consent of Independent Accountants

 

 23.1Ernst & Young LLP dated February 25, 2010 (filed herewith).

 

24.Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

 

31.Section 302 Certifications

 

 31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

98


Table of Contents
 31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

32.Section 906 Certifications

 

 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

99.Additional Exhibits

 

 99.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).

 

99


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

December 31, 2009

(Dollars in thousands)

 

  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:

           

7-Eleven:

            

Land O’ Lakes, FL

 —   1,077 817 —   —   1,077 817   1,894 224   1999   10/98 (g)  40 years  

Tampa, FL

 —   1,081 917 —   —   1,081 917   1,998 248   1999   12/98 (g)  40 years  

A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc.:

            

Dover, NJ

 —   1,138 3,238 —   —   1,138 3,238   4,376 901   1995   11/98   40 years  

Academy:

            

Pasadena, TX

 —   900 2,181 —   —   900 2,181   3,081 588   1994   03/99   40 years  

Beaumont, TX

 —   1,424 2,449 —   —   1,424 2,449   3,873 661   1992   03/99   40 years  

Houston, TX

 —   2,311 1,628 —   —   2,311 1,628   3,939 439   1976   03/99   40 years  

Franklin, TN

 —   1,807 2,108 —   —   1,807 2,108   3,915 319   1999   06/05   30 years  

Ace Hardware and Lighting:

            

Bourbonnais, IL

 —   298 1,329 —   —   298 1,329   1,627 300   1997   11/98   37 years  

Advance Auto Parts:

            

Miami, FL

 —   867 —   1,035 —   867 1,035   1,902 118   2005   12/04 (g)  40 years  

American Payday Loans:

            

Des Moines, IA

 —   108 379 —   —   108 379   487 43   1979   06/05   40 years  

AmerUs Group Warehouse:

            

Des Moines, IA

 —   28 85 —   —   28 85   113 39   1949   06/05   10 years  

Amoco:

            

Miami, FL

 —   969 —   —   —   969 (i 969 (i (i 05/03   (i

Sunrise, FL

 —   949 —   —   —   949 (i 949 (i (i 06/03   (i

Amscot:

            

Tampa, FL

 —   1,160 352 —   —   1,160 352   1,512 37   1981   10/05   40 years  

Orlando, FL

 —   764 —   866 —   764 866   1,630 78   2006   12/05   40 years  

Orlando, FL

 —   664 1,011 —   —   664 1,011   1,675 81   2006   12/05   40 years  

Orlando, FL

 —   358 —   922 —   358 922   1,280 80   2006   02/06 (g)  40 years  

Orlando, FL

 —   546 —   938 —   546 938   1,484 79   2006   02/06 (g)  40 years  

Clearwater, FL

 —   456 332 —   —   456 332   788 27   1967   09/06 (g)  40 years  

Applebee’s:

            

Ballwin, MO

 —   1,496 1,404 —   —   1,496 1,404   2,900 282   1995   12/01   40 years  

Arby’s:

            

Whitmore Lake, MI

 —   171 469 —   —   171 469   640 94   1993   12/01   40 years  

Washington Courthouse,

OH

 —   157 546 —   —   157 546   703 110   1998   12/01   40 years  

Colorado Springs,

CO

 —   206 534 —   —   206 534   740 107   1998   12/01   40 years  

Thomson, GA

 —   268 504 —   —   268 504   772 101   1997   12/01   40 years  

Arizona Oil:

            

Peoria, AZ

 —   860 1,117 —   —   860 1,117   1,977 60   1987   05/08   30 years  

Tucson, AZ

 —   1,105 1,336 —   —   1,105 1,336   2,441 62   1992   05/08   35 years  

Prescott, AZ

 —   1,266 1,261 —   —   1,266 1,261   2,527 59   1997   05/08   35 years  

Sedona, AZ

 —   1,281 1,324 —   —   1,281 1,324   2,605 54   2000   05/08   40 years  

Gilbert, AZ

 —   1,317 1,304 —   —   1,317 1,304   2,621 61   1996   05/08   35 years  

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 1


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Tucson, AZ

 —     1,083 1,599 —   —   1,083 1,599   2,682 74   1992 05/08   35 years  

Mesa, AZ

 —     1,332 1,367 —   —   1,332 1,367   2,699 74   1986 05/08   30 years  

Scottsdale, AZ

 —     1,529 1,373 —   —   1,529 1,373   2,902 64   1999 05/08   35 years  

Miami, AZ

 —     762 2,148 —   —   762 2,148   2,910 100   1998 05/08   35 years  

Tucson, AZ

 —     1,457 1,619 —   —   1,457 1,619   3,076 75   1995 05/08   35 years  

Tucson, AZ

 —     1,223 1,911 —   —   1,223 1,911   3,134 89   1996 05/08   35 years  

Glendale, AZ

 —     1,817 2,415 —   —   1,817 2,415   4,232 98   2001 05/08   40 years  

Casa Grande, AZ

 —     2,340 1,894 —   —   2,340 1,894   4,234 88   1993 05/08   35 years  

Mesa, AZ

 —     2,219 2,140 —   —   2,219 2,140   4,359 87   2000 05/08   40 years  

Ashley Furniture:

            

Altamonte Springs,

FL

 —     2,906 4,877 315 —   2,906 5,192   8,098 1,564   1997 09/97   40 years  

Louisville, KY

 —     1,667 4,989 —   —   1,667 4,989   6,656 598   2005 03/05   40 years  

Babies “R” Us:

            

Arlington, TX

 —     831 2,612 —   —   831 2,612   3,443 882   1996 06/96   40 years  

Independence, MO

 —     1,679 2,302 115 —   1,679 2,417   4,096 472   1996 12/01   40 years  

Barnes & Noble:

            

Brandon, FL

 —     1,476 1,527 —   —   1,476 1,527   3,003 572   1995 08/94 (f)  40 years  

Glendale, CO

 —     3,245 2,722 —   —   3,245 2,722   5,967 1,038   1994 09/94   40 years  

Houston, TX

 —     3,308 2,396 —   —   3,308 2,396   5,704 854   1995 10/94 (f)  40 years  

Plantation, FL

 4,677 (p)  3,616 —   —   —   3,616 (c 3,616 (c 1996 05/95 (f)  (c

Freehold, NJ (n)

 —     2,917 2,261 —   —   2,917 2,261   5,178 787   1995 01/96   40 years  

Dayton, OH

 —     1,413 3,325 —   —   1,413 3,325   4,738 1,026   1996 05/97   40 years  

Redding, CA

 —     497 1,626 —   —   497 1,626   2,123 510   1997 06/97   40 years  

Memphis, TN

 —     1,574 2,242 —   —   1,574 2,242   3,816 332   1997 09/97   40 years  

Marlton, NJ

 —     2,831 4,319 —   —   2,709 4,319   7,028 1,201   1995 11/98   40 years  

Bassett Furniture:

            

Fairview Heights, IL

 —     1,258 2,623 —   —   1,258 2,623   3,881 276   1980 10/05   40 years  

Bealls:

            

Sarasota, FL

 —     1,078 1,795 —   —   1,078 1,795   2,873 278   1996 09/97   40 years  

Beautiful America Dry Cleaners:

            

Orlando, FL

 52 (o)  40 111 —   —   40 111   151 16   2001 02/04   40 years  

Bed Bath & Beyond:

            

Richmond, VA

 2,680 (p)  1,184 2,843 —   —   1,184 2,843   4,027 539   1997 06/98   40 years  

Glendale, AZ

 —     1,082 —   2,758 —   1,082 2,758   3,840 721   1999 12/98 (g)  40 years  

Midland, MI

 —     231 —   2,702 —   231 2,702   2,933 212   2006 07/03   40 years  

Best Buy:

            

Brandon, FL

 —     2,985 2,772 —   —   2,985 2,772   5,757 892   1996 02/97   40 years  

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

 —     3,709 2,359 —   —   3,709 2,359   6,068 740   1970 06/97   40 years  

Rockville, MD

 —     6,233 3,419 —   —   6,233 3,419   9,652 1,065   1995 07/97   40 years  

Fairfax, VA

 —     3,052 3,218 —   —   3,052 3,218   6,270 996   1995 08/97   40 years  

St. Petersburg, FL

 4,277 (p)  4,032 2,611 —   —   4,032 2,611   6,643 566   1997 09/97   35 years  

Pittsburg, PA

 —     2,331 2,293 —   —   2,331 2,293   4,624 662   1997 06/98   40 years  

Denver, CO

 —     8,882 4,373 —   —   8,882 4,373   13,255 934   1991 06/01   40 years  

Best Smoke & Gas:

            

Abbottstown, PA

 —     55 200 —   —   55 200   255 20   2000 01/06   40 years  

Billy Bob’s:

            

Gresham, OR

 —     817 108 —   —   817 108   925 22   1993 12/01   40 years  

BJ’s Wholesale Club:

            

Orlando, FL

 4,246 (o)  3,271 8,627 367 —   3,271 8,993   12,264 1,296   2001 02/04   40 years  

Black Fox Beauty Supply:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

 —     116 137 11 —   116 148   264 59   1967 11/93   40 years  

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 2


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Blockbuster Video:

            

Conyers, GA

 —     320 556 —   —   320 556   876 174   1997 06/97   40 years  

Mobile, AL

 —     843 562 —   —   843 562   1,405 113   1997 12/01   40 years  

Glasgow, KY

 —     303 561 —   —   303 561   864 113   1997 12/01   40 years  

Alice, TX

 —     318 578 —   —   318 578   896 116   1995 12/01   40 years  

Gainesville, GA

 —     295 612 —   —   295 612   907 123   1997 12/01   40 years  

Kingsville, TX

 —     499 458 30 —   499 487   986 94   1995 12/01   40 years  

Mobile, AL

 —     491 498 —   —   491 498   989 100   1997 12/01   40 years  

BMW:

            

Duluth, GA

 —     4,434 4,080 6,559 —   4,504 10,639   15,143 1,169   1984 12/01   40 years  

Borders:

            

Wilmington, DE

 —     3,031 6,062 —   —   2,994 6,062   9,056 2,277   1994 12/94   40 years  

Richmond, VA

 —     2,177 2,600 —   —   2,177 2,600   4,777 946   1995 06/95   40 years  

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

 4,505 (p)  3,165 3,319 —   —   3,165 3,319   6,484 763   1995 02/96   33 years  

Bangor, ME

 —     1,547 2,487 —   —   1,547 2,487   4,034 841   1996 06/96   40 years  

Altamonte Springs,

FL

 —     1,947 —   —   —   1,947 (c 1,947 (c 1997 09/97   (c

Borough of Abbottstown:

            

Abbottstown, PA

 —     55 200 —   —   55 200   255 20   2000 01/06   40 years  

Boston Market:

            

Warren, OH

 —     562 468 —   —   562 468   1,030 94   1997 12/01   40 years  

Novi, MI

 —     836 651 —   —   836 298   1,134 65   1995 12/01   40 years  

Burton, MI

 —     620 707 —   —   620 707   1,327 142   1997 12/01   40 years  

Geneva, IL

 —     1,125 1,037 —   —   1,125 893   2,018 182   1996 12/01   40 years  

Orland Park, IL

 —     562 556 —   —   562 377   939 78   1995 12/01   40 years  

N. Olmsted, OH

 —     602 461 —   —   602 389   991 79   1996 12/01   40 years  

Buck’s:

            

St. Louis, MO

 —     776 —   3,822 —   776 3,822   4,598 68   2009 12/07 (m)  40 years  

Buffalo Wild Wings:

            

Michigan City, IN

 —     163 492 —   —   163 492   655 99   1996 12/01   40 years  

Bugaboo Creek:

            

Lithonia, GA

 —     923 1,276 —   —   923 1,276   2,199 81   2002 06/07   40 years  

Rochester, NY

 —     792 1,535 —   —   792 1,535   2,327 98   1995 06/07   40 years  

Burger King:

            

Colonial Heights,

VA

 —     662 610 —   —   662 610   1,272 123   1997 12/01   40 years  

Carl’s Jr.:

            

Spokane, WA

 —     471 530 —   —   471 530   1,001 107   1996 12/01   40 years  

Tucson, AZ

 —     681 536 103 —   681 639   1,320 277   1988 06/05   10 years  

Chandler, AZ

 —     729 644 —   —   729 644   1,373 146   1984 06/05   20 years  

Carvers:

            

Centerville, OH

 —     851 1,059 —   —   851 1,059   1,910 213   1986 12/01   40 years  

Cash Advance:

            

Mesa, AZ

 —     43 113 251 —   43 363   406 45   1997 12/01   40 years  

Certified Auto Sales:

            

Albuquerque, NM

 —     1,113 —   1,419 —   1,113 1,419   2,532 158   2005 04/04 (f)  40 years  

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 3


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Champps:

            

Irving, TX

 —     1,760 1,724 —   —   1,760 1,724   3,484 347   2000 12/01   40 years  

Alpharetta, GA

 —     3,033 1,642 —   —   3,033 1,642   4,675 330   1999 12/01   40 years  

Char-Hut:

            

Sunrise, FL

 —     287 424 —   —   287 424   711 59   1979 05/04   40 years  

Checkers:

            

Orlando, FL

 —     257 —   —   —   257 (c 257 (c 1988 07/92   (c

Chili’s:

            

Milledgeville, GA

 —     516 1,997 —   —   516 1,997   2,513 214   2005 09/05   40 years  

Camden, SC

 —     627 1,888 —   —   627 1,888   2,515 203   2005 09/05   40 years  

Sumter, SC

 —     800 1,717 —   —   800 1,717   2,517 174   2004 12/05   40 years  

Hinesville, GA

 —     921 1,898 —   —   921 1,898   2,819 136   2006 02/07   40 years  

Albany, GA

 —     615 —   1,984 —   615 1,984   2,599 110   2007 06/07 (m)  40 years  

Statesboro, GA

 —     703 —   1,888 —   703 1,888   2,591 100   2007 06/07 (m)  40 years  

Florence, SC

 —     889 1,715 —   —   889 1,715   2,604 109   2007 06/07   40 years  

Valdosta, GA

 —     716 —   1,871 —   716 1,871   2,587 95   2007 07/07 (m)  40 years  

Tifton, GA

 —     454 1,550 —   —   454 1,550   2,004 47   2008 06/08 (m)  40 years  

Evans, GA

 —     700 —   1,511 —   700 1,511   2,211 33   2009 10/08 (m)  40 years  

Wichita, KS

 —     420 623 —   —   420 623   1,043 1   1995 12/09   30 years  

Jefferson City, MO

 —     305 898 —   —   305 898   1,203 1   2003 12/09   35 years  

Merriam, KS

 —     853 981 —   —   853 981   1,834 1   1998 12/09   30 years  

China 1:

            

Cohoes, NY

 —     16 87 1 —   16 88   104 12   1994 09/04   40 years  

China Wok:

            

Carlisle, PA

 —     90 107 —   —   90 107   197 11   1988 01/06   40 years  

Claim Jumper:

            

Roseville, CA

 —     1,557 2,014 —   —   1,557 2,014   3,571 405   2000 12/01   40 years  

Tempe, AZ

 —     2,531 2,921 —   —   2,531 2,921   5,452 587   2000 12/01   40 years  

Continental Rental:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —     88 633 —   —   88 633   721 38   2007 10/05   40 years  

CORA Rehabilitation

Clinics:

            

Orlando, FL

 104 (o)  80 221 —   —   80 221   301 32   2001 02/04   40 years  

Corpus Christi Flea Market:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

 —     224 2,159 —   —   224 2,159   2,383 582   1983 03/99   40 years  

CVS:

            

San Antonio, TX

 —     441 —   —   —   441 (c 441 (c 1993 12/93   (c

Lafayette, LA

 —     968 —   —   —   968 (c 968 (c 1995 01/96   (c

Midwest City, OK

 —     673 1,103 —   —   673 1,103   1,776 381   1996 03/96   40 years  

Pantego, TX

 —     1,016 1,449 —   —   1,016 1,449   2,465 454   1997 06/97   40 years  

Flower Mound,

TX

 —     932 881 —   —   932 881   1,813 130   1996 09/97   40 years  

Leavenworth, KS

 —     726 —   1,331 —   726 1,331   2,057 384   1998 11/97 (g)  40 years  

Arlington, TX

 —     2,079 —   1,397 —   2,079 1,397   3,476 397   1998 11/97 (g)  40 years  

Lewisville, TX

 —     789 —   1,335 —   789 1,335   2,124 377   1998 04/98 (g)  40 years  

Forest Hill, TX

 —     692 —   1,175 —   692 1,175   1,867 334   1998 04/98 (g)  40 years  

Garland, TX

 —     1,477 —   1,400 —   1,477 1,400   2,877 389   1998 06/98 (g)  40 years  

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 4


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Oklahoma City, OK

 —   1,581 —   1,471 —   1,581 1,471   3,052 403   1999   08/98 (g)  40 years  

Dallas, TX

 —   2,618 —   2,571 —   2,618 2,571   5,189 399   2003   06/99   40 years  

Gladstone, MO

 —   1,851 —   1,740 —   1,851 1,740   3,591 408   2000   12/99 (g)  40 years  

Dave & Buster’s:

            

Hilliard, OH

 —   934 4,689 —   —   934 4,689   5,623 366   1998   11/06   40 years  

Tulsa, OK

 —   1,862 —   2,105 —   1,862 2,105   3,967 50   2009   04/08   40 years  

Wauwatosa, WI

 —   5,694 —   —   —   5,694 (e 5,694 (e (e 12/08   (e

Denny’s:

            

Columbus, TX (n)

 —   428 817 —   —   428 817   1,245 164   1997   12/01   40 years  

N. Miami, FL

 —   855 151 —   —   855 151   1,006 25   1977   09/06   20 years  

Wethersfield, CT

 —   884 176 —   —   884 176   1,060 29   1978   09/06   20 years  

Nampa, ID

 —   357 729 —   —   357 729   1,086 120   1979   09/06   20 years  

Indianapolis, IN

 —   358 767 —   —   358 767   1,125 126   1978   09/06   20 years  

Merriville, IN

 —   368 813 —   —   368 813   1,181 134   1976   09/06   20 years  

Lafayette, IN

 —   424 773 —   —   416 773   1,189 127   1978   09/06   20 years  

Tucson, AZ

 —   922 290 —   —   922 290   1,212 48   1979   09/06   20 years  

Amarillo, TX

 —   590 632 —   —   590 632   1,222 104   1982   09/06   20 years  

Carson, CA

 —   1,246 157 —   —   1,246 157   1,403 26   1975   09/06   20 years  

Corpus Christi,

TX

 —   345 776 300 —   345 1,076   1,421 136   1980   09/06   20 years  

Fairfax, VA

 —   768 683 —   —   768 683   1,451 112   1979   09/06   20 years  

Raleigh, NC

 —   1,094 482 —   —   1,094 482   1,576 79   1984   09/06   20 years  

Hialeah, FL

 —   432 175 —   —   432 175   607 29   1978   09/06   20 years  

North Richland

Hills, TX

 —   500 130 —   —   500 130   630 21   1970   09/06   20 years  

Dallas, TX

 —   497 150 —   —   497 150   647 25   1979   09/06   20 years  

Sugarland, TX

 —   315 334 —   —   315 334   649 55   1997   09/06   20 years  

Florissant, MO

 —   443 238 —   —   443 238   681 39   1977   09/06   20 years  

Arlington Heights,

IL

 —   470 228 —   —   470 228   698 37   1977   09/06   20 years  

Colorado Springs, CO

 —   321 377 —   —   321 377   698 62   1984   09/06   20 years  

Campbell, CA

 —   460 238 —   —   460 238   698 39   1976   09/06   20 years  

Chehalis, WA

 —   415 287 —   —   415 287   702 47   1977   09/06   20 years  

Indianapolis, IN

 —   223 483 —   —   223 483   706 79   1979   09/06   20 years  

Ft. Worth, TX

 —   392 314 —   —   392 314   706 52   1974   09/06   20 years  

Southfield, MI

 —   401 330 —   —   401 330   731 54   1980   09/06   20 years  

Provo, UT

 —   519 216 —   —   519 216   735 36   1978   09/06   20 years  

Federal Way, WA

 —   543 193 —   —   543 193   736 32   1977   09/06   20 years  

Chubbuck, ID

 —   350 394 —   —   344 394   738 65   1983   09/06   20 years  

Hermitage, PA

 —   321 420 —   —   321 420   741 69   1980   09/06   20 years  

Indianapolis, IN

 —   231 511 —   —   231 511   742 84   1974   09/06   20 years  

Little Rock, AR

 —   672 77 —   —   672 77   749 13   1979   09/06   20 years  

Boardman Township,

OH

 —   497 258 —   —   497 258   755 42   1977   09/06   20 years  

Middleburg Heights,

OH

 —   497 260 —   —   497 260   757 43   1976   09/06   20 years  

Pueblo, CO

 —   475 302 —   —   475 302   777 50   1980   09/06   20 years  

W. Palm Beach, FL

 —   619 161 —   —   619 161   780 26   1984   09/06   20 years  

Tacoma, WA

 —   580 201 —   —   580 201   781 33   1984   09/06   20 years  

St. Louis, MO

 —   520 266 —   —   520 266   786 44   1973   09/06   20 years  

Alexandria, VA

 —   604 196 —   —   604 196   800 32   1981   09/06   20 years  

Omaha, NE

 —   496 314 —   —   496 314   810 52   1994   09/06   20 years  

Pompano Beach, FL

 —   436 394 —   —   436 394   830 65   1976   09/06   20 years  

Indianapolis, IN

 —   326 511 —   —   326 511   837 84   1978   09/06   20 years  

Novi, MI

 —   545 305 —   —   545 305   850 50   1979   09/06   20 years  

Houston, TX

 —   504 348 —   —   504 348   852 57   1976   09/06   20 years  

Austintown, OH

 —   466 397 —   —   466 397   863 65   1980   09/06   20 years  

Clackamas, OR

 —   468 407 —   —   468 407   875 67   1993   09/06   20 years  

Worcester, MA

 —   383 493 —   —   383 493   876 81   1978   09/06   20 years  

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 5


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Little Rock, AR

 —   703 180 —   —   703 180   883 30   1979 09/06   20 years  

Indianapolis, IN

 —   310 590 —   —   310 590   900 97   1981 09/06   20 years  

Maplewood, MN

 —   630 271 —   —   630 271   901 45   1983 09/06   20 years  

Laurel, MD

 —   528 379 —   —   528 379   907 62   1976 09/06   20 years  

Enfield, CT

 —   684 229 —   —   684 229   913 38   1976 09/06   20 years  

Portland, OR

 —   764 161 —   —   764 161   925 27   1977 09/06   20 years  

Collinsville, IL

 —   676 283 —   —   676 283   959 47   1979 09/06   20 years  

Kernersville, NC

 —   407 557 —   —   407 557   964 92   2000 09/06   20 years  

Colorado Springs, CO

 —   585 390 —   —   585 390   975 64   1978 09/06   20 years  

Boise, ID

 —   514 477 —   —   514 477   991 73   1983 12/06   20 years  

Virginia Gardens, FL

 —   793 133 —   —   793 133   926 20   1977 01/07   20 years  

St. Louis, MO

 —   635 303 —   —   635 303   938 45   1980 01/07   20 years  

Dick’s Sporting Goods:

            

Taylor, MI

 —   1,920 3,527 —   —   1,920 3,527   5,447 1,172   1996 08/96   40 years  

White Marsh, MD

 —   2,681 3,917 —   —   2,681 3,917   6,598 1,302   1996 08/96   40 years  

Dollar General:

            

Memphis, TN

 —   266 1,136 —   —   266 1,136   1,402 299   1998 12/97   40 years  

Dollar Tree:

            

Garland, TX

 —   239 626 —   —   239 626   865 133   1994 02/94   40 years  

Copperas Cove, TX

 —   242 512 194 —   242 706   948 181   1972 11/98   40 years  

Donato’s:

            

Medina, OH

 —   405 464 —   —   405 464   869 93   1996 12/01   40 years  

Dr. Clean Dry Cleaners:

            

Monticello, NY

 —   20 72 —   —   20 72   92 9   1996 03/05   40 years  

Easyhome:

            

Cohoes, NY

 —   59 319 222 —   59 541   600 51   1994 09/04   40 years  

El Tapatio Grill:

            

Hammond, LA

 —   248 814 62 —   248 627   875 140   1997 12/01   40 years  

Enterprise Rent-A-Car:

            

Wilmington, NC

 —   218 327 33 —   218 360   578 67   1981 12/01   40 years  

Express Oil Change:

            

Birmingham, AL

 —   470 695 —   —   470 695   1,165 31   2008 02/08 (f)  40 years  

Opelika, AL

 —   547 680 —   —   547 680   1,227 32   2006 02/08   40 years  

Florence, AL

 —   110 381 —   —   110 381   491 24   1987 02/08   30 years  

Muscle Shoals, AL

 —   168 624 —   —   168 624   792 39   1985 02/08   30 years  

Helena, AL

 —   363 628 —   —   363 628   991 29   1998 02/08   40 years  

Memphis, TN

 —   402 721 —   —   402 721   1,123 19   2001 12/08   40 years  

Cordova, TN

 —   639 785 —   —   639 785   1,424 20   2000 12/08   40 years  

Lakeland, TN

 —   186 489 —   —   186 489   675 13   2000 12/08   40 years  

Horn Lake, MS

 —   326 611 —   —   326 611   937 18   1998 12/08   35 years  

Fallas Paredes:

            

Arlington, TX

 —   318 1,680 242 —   318 1,923   2,241 572   1996 06/96   38 years  

Family Dollar:

            

Hudson Falls, NY

 —   51 380 —   —   51 380   431 50   1993 09/04   40 years  

Cohoes, NY

 —   96 507 5 —   96 512   608 67   1994 09/04   40 years  

Monticello, NY

 —   96 352 —   —   96 352   448 42   1996 03/05   40 years  

Famous Footwear:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —   163 835 —   —   163 835   998 48   2007 10/05   40 years  

Fantastic Sams:

            

Eden Prairie, MN

 —   65 181 81 —   65 261   326 50   1997 12/01   40 years  

Fazoli’s:

            

Bay City, MI

 —   647 634 —   —   647 634   1,281 127   1997 12/01   40 years  

Ferguson:

            

Destin, FL

 —   554 1,012 253 —   554 1,265   1,819 80   2006 03/07   40 years  

Flash Markets:

            

Lebanon, TN

 —   582 —   2,063 —   582 2,063   2,645 97   2007 03/07 (m)  40 years  

Food 4 Less:

            

Chula Vista, CA

 —   3,569 —   —   —   3,569 (c 3,569 (c 1995 11/98   (c

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 6


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Food Fast:

            

Kemp, TX

 —   581 505 —   —   581 505   1,086 51   1986   06/07   25 years  

Forney, TX

 —   473 654 —   —   473 654   1,127 55   1990   06/07   30 years  

Forney, TX

 —   545 707 —   —   545 707   1,252 60   1989   06/07   30 years  

Tyler, TX

 —   742 546 —   —   742 546   1,288 56   1985   06/07   25 years  

Jacksonville, TX

 —   660 632 —   —   660 632   1,292 107   1976   06/07   15 years  

Tyler, TX

 —   488 831 —   —   488 831   1,319 106   1980   06/07   20 years  

Bossier City, LA

 —   883 658 —   —   883 658   1,541 111   1975   06/07   15 years  

Longview, TX

 —   178 236 —   —   178 236   414 30   1977   06/07   20 years  

Tyler, TX

 —   188 329 —   —   188 329   517 33   1984   06/07   25 years  

Longview, TX

 —   252 304 —   —   252 304   556 31   1983   06/07   25 years  

Tyler, TX

 —   323 283 —   —   323 283   606 36   1978   06/07   20 years  

Shreveport, LA

 —   361 250 —   —   361 250   611 42   1969   06/07   15 years  

Gun Barrel City, TX

 —   270 386 —   —   270 386   656 39   1986   06/07   25 years  

Tyler, TX

 —   258 419 —   —   258 419   677 53   1978   06/07   20 years  

Flint, TX

 —   272 411 —   —   272 411   683 42   1985   06/07   25 years  

Longview, TX

 —   271 431 —   —   271 431   702 36   1990   06/07   30 years  

Gun Barrel City, TX

 —   242 467 —   —   242 467   709 48   1988   06/07   25 years  

Brownsboro, TX

 —   328 385 —   —   328 385   713 33   1990   06/07   30 years  

Mabank, TX

 —   229 494 —   —   229 494   723 50   1986   06/07   25 years  

Tyler, TX

 —   302 455 —   —   302 455   757 58   1981   06/07   20 years  

Tyler, TX

 —   256 542 —   —   256 542   798 69   1980   06/07   20 years  

Longview, TX

 —   426 382 —   —   426 382   808 39   1984   06/07   25 years  

Tyler, TX

 —   316 545 —   —   316 545   861 46   1989   06/07   30 years  

Tyler, TX

 —   542 403 —   —   481 403   884 41   1984   06/07   25 years  

Longview, TX

 —   360 535 —   —   360 535   895 54   1983   06/07   25 years  

Mt. Vernon, TX

 —   292 666 —   —   292 666   958 68   1990   06/07   25 years  

Longview, TX

 —   403 572 —   —   403 572   975 58   1985   06/07   25 years  

Fresh Market:

            

Gainesville, FL

 —   317 1,248 656 —   317 1,904   2,221 240   1982   03/99   40 years  

Fuel-On:

            

Johnsonburg, PA

 —   781 504 —   —   781 504   1,285 110   1978   08/05   20 years  

White Haven, PA

 —   486 867 —   —   486 867   1,353 190   1990   08/05   20 years  

Dallas, PA

 —   677 1,091 —   —   677 1,091   1,768 239   1995   08/05   20 years  

Yeagertown, PA

 —   142 180 —   —   142 180   322 39   1977   08/05   20 years  

Hazleton, PA

 —   2,529 728 —   —   2,529 728   3,257 159   2001   08/05   20 years  

Kane, PA

 —   478 592 —   —   356 —     356 —     1984   08/05   20 years  

St. Mary’s, PA

 —   274 261 —   —   274 261   535 57   1979   08/05   20 years  

Luzerne, PA

 —   171 415 —   —   171 415   586 91   1989   08/05   20 years  

Bloomsburg, PA

 —   541 146 —   —   541 146   687 32   1967   08/05   20 years  

Emporium, PA

 —   380 569 —   —   380 569   949 124   1996   08/05   20 years  

Minersville, PA

 —   680 582 —   —   680 582   1,262 58   1974   01/06   40 years  

Houtzdale, PA

 —   541 500 —   —   356 —     356 —     1977   01/06   15 years  

Summerville, PA

 —   93 272 —   —   93 272   365 27   1988   01/06   40 years  

Carlisle, PA

 —   170 202 —   —   170 202   372 20   1988   01/06   40 years  

Danville, PA

 —   180 359 —   —   180 359   539 36   1988   01/06   40 years  

Zelienople, PA

 —   160 437 —   —   160 437   597 43   1988   01/06   40 years  

Furniture Xpress:

            

Buford, GA

 —   1,925 5,035 —   —   1,925 5,035   6,960 687   2003   07/04   40 years  

Furr’s Family Dining:

            

Las Cruces, NM

 —   947 —   2,182 —   947 2,182   3,129 180   2006   01/06 (m)  40 years  

Tucson, AZ

 —   1,156 —   —   —   1,156 (e 1,156 (e (e 07/06   (e

Moore, OK

 —   939 —   2,429 —   939 2,429   3,368 134   2007   03/07 (m)  40 years  

Gander Mountain:

            

Amarillo, TX

 —   1,514 5,781 —   —   1,514 5,781   7,295 741   2004   11/04   40 years  

Gate Petroleum:

            

Rocky Mount, NC

 —   259 1,164 —   —   259 1,164   1,423 132   2000   06/05   40 years  

Concord, NC

 —   852 1,201 —   —   852 1,201   2,053 136   2001   06/05   40 years  

Gen-X Clothing:

            

Federal Way, WA

 —   2,037 1,662 257 —   2,037 1,919   3,956 519   1994   06/98   40 years  

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 7


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
 Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land  Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land  Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Golden Corral:

            

Lake Placid, FL

 —   115   305 44 —   115   349   464 235   1985   05/85 35 years  

Dallas, TX

 —   1,138   1,025 —   —   1,138   1,025   2,163 206   1994   12/01 40 years  

Brandon, FL

 —   1,188   1,339 —   —   1,188   1,339   2,527 269   1998   12/01 40 years  

Temple Terrace, FL

 —   1,330   1,391 —   —   1,330   1,391   2,721 280   1997   12/01 40 years  

Goodyear Truck & Tire:

            

Park City, KS

 —   214   687 —   —   214   687   901 156   1989   06/05 20 years  

Anthony, TX

 —   (l 1,242 —   —   (l 1,242   1,242 76   2007   02/07 40 years  

Great Clips:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —   27   194 —   —   27   194   221 11   2007   10/05 40 years  

Green Light Convenience:

            

Moosic, PA

 —   323   309 —   —   323   309   632 68   1980   08/05 20 years  

Guitar Center:

            

Roseville, MN

 —   1,599   1,419 —   —   1,599   1,419   3,018 143   1994   08/06 40 years  

GymKix:

            

Copperas Cove, TX

 —   204   432 171 —   204   603   807 155   1972   11/98 40 years  

H&R Block:

            

Swansea, IL

 —   46   132 69 —   46   201   247 39   1997   12/01 40 years  

Hastings:

            

Nacogdoches, TX

 —   397   1,257 —   —   397   1,257   1,654 350   1997   11/98 40 years  

Havertys Furniture:

            

Orlando, FL

 —   820   2,441 6 —   820   2,448   3,268 936   1992   05/93 40 years  

Clearwater, FL

 —   1,184   2,526 44 —   1,184   2,570   3,754 1,060   1992   05/93 40 years  

Pensacola, FL

 —   633   1,595 —   —   603   1,595   2,198 539   1994   06/96 40 years  

Bowie, MD

 —   1,966   4,221 —   —   1,966   4,221   6,187 1,147   1997   12/97 39 years  

Healthy Pet:

            

Suwanee, GA

 —   175   1,038 —   —   175   1,038   1,213 79   1997   12/06 40 years  

Colonial Heights, VA

 —   160   746 —   —   160   746   906 55   1996   01/07 40 years  

Heilig-Meyers/The Room Store:

            

Baltimore, MD

 —   470   813 —   —   470   813   1,283 226   1968   11/98 40 years  

Glen Burnie, MD

 —   632   932 —   —   632   932   1,564 259   1968   11/98 40 years  

Hog Pit:

            

Tucson, AZ

 —   827   305 18 —   845   305   1,150 70   1974   12/01 40 years  

Hollywood Video:

            

Cincinnati, OH

 —   282   521 279 —   543   539   1,082 106   1998   12/01 40 years  

Clifton, CO

 —   245   732 —   —   245   732   977 147   1998   12/01 40 years  

Home Decor:

            

Memphis, TN

 —   549   540 364 —   549   904   1,453 224   1998   12/97 40 years  

Home Depot:

            

Sunrise, FL

 —   5,149   —   —   —   5,149   (i 5,149 (i (i 05/03 (i

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 8


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

HomeGoods:

            

Fairfax, VA

 —     978 1,414 937 —   978 2,352 3,330 482   1995   12/95   40 years  

Hooters:

            

Tampa, FL

 —     784 505 —   —   784 505 1,289 101   1993   12/01   40 years  

Humana:

            

Sunrise, FL

 —     800 253 —   —   800 253 1,053 35   1984   05/04   40 years  

Hy-Vee:

            

St. Joseph, MO

 —     1,580 2,849 —   —   1,580 2,849 4,429 519   1991   09/02   40 years  

Int’l House of Pancakes:

            

Midwest City, OK

 —     407 —   —   —   407 —   407 (i (i 11/00   (i

Ankeny, IA

 —     693 515 —   —   693 515 1,208 78   2002   06/05   30 years  

J & J Insurance:

            

Hollywood, FL

 —     193 44 18 —   116 —   116 —     1960   12/05   15 years  

Jack in the Box:

            

Plano, TX

 —     1,055 1,237 —   —   1,055 1,237 2,292 140   2001   06/05   40 years  

Jacobson Industrial:

            

Des Moines, IA

 —     61 112 —   —   61 112 173 26   1973   06/05   20 years  

Jared Jewelers:

            

Richmond, VA

 —     955 1,336 —   —   955 1,336 2,291 269   1998   12/01   40 years  

Brandon, FL

 —     1,197 1,182 —   —   1,197 1,182 2,379 226   2001   05/02   40 years  

Lithonia, GA

 —     1,271 1,216 —   —   1,271 1,216 2,487 232   2001   05/02   40 years  

Houston, TX

 —     1,676 1,440 —   —   1,676 1,440 3,116 253   1999   12/02   40 years  

Jazzercise Fitness Center:

            

Orlando, FL

 48 (o)  37 101 —   —   37 101 138 15   2001   02/04   40 years  

Jin’s Asian Cafe:

            

Sealy, TX

 —     67 74 —   —   67 74 141 20   1982   03/99   40 years  

Jo-Ann etc:

            

Corpus Christi,

TX

 —     818 896 12 —   818 909 1,727 366   1967   11/93   40 years  

St. Peters, MO

 —     1,741 5,406 —   —   1,741 5,406 7,147 603   2005   06/05 (g)  40 years  

Johnny Carino’s:

            

S. Beaumont, TX

 —     439 1,363 —   —   439 1,363 1,802 274   2000   12/01   40 years  

Lubbock, TX

 —     1,007 1,206 —   —   1,007 1,206 2,213 242   1995   12/01   40 years  

Lewisville, TX

 —     1,370 1,019 —   —   1,370 1,019 2,389 205   1994   12/01   40 years  

Joyful Noize Cafe:

            

Montgomery, AL

 —     1,418 1,140 —   —   1,418 1,044 2,462 218   1999   12/01   40 years  

Kangaroo Express:

            

Siler City, NC

 —     586 645 —   —   586 645 1,231 54   1998   08/06   40 years  

Sanford, NC

 —     666 661 —   —   666 661 1,327 56   2000   08/06   40 years  

Sanford, NC

 —     1,638 1,371 —   —   1,638 1,371 3,009 116   2003   08/06   40 years  

Carthage, NC

 —     485 354 —   —   485 354 839 30   1989   08/06   40 years  

West End, NC

 —     426 516 —   —   426 516 942 44   1999   08/06   40 years  

Belleview, FL

 —     471 1,451 —   —   471 1,451 1,922 122   2006   08/06   40 years  

Jacksonville, FL

 —     683 1,362 —   —   683 1,362 2,045 115   1969   08/06   40 years  

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 9


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
 Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Jacksonville, FL

 —     807 1,239 —   —   807 1,239 2,046 105 1975 08/06 40 years

Destin, FL

 —     1,366 1,192 —   —   1,366 1,192 2,558 98 2000 09/06 40 years

Niceville, FL

 —     1,434 1,124 —   —   1,434 1,124 2,558 93 2000 09/06 40 years

Kill Devil Hills, NC

 —     490 741 —   —   490 741 1,231 59 1995 10/06 40 years

Kill Devil Hills, NC

 —     679 552 —   —   679 552 1,231 44 1990 10/06 40 years

Interlachen, FL

 —     519 1,500 —   —   519 1,500 2,019 67 2007 10/06 40 years

Clarksville, TN

 —     521 710 —   —   521 710 1,231 54 1999 12/06 40 years

Clarksville, TN

 —     276 955 —   —   276 955 1,231 73 1999 12/06 40 years

Gallatin, TN

 —     474 757 —   —   474 757 1,231 57 1999 12/06 40 years

Midland City, AL

 —     729 2,538 —   —   729 2,538 3,267 193 2006 12/06 40 years

Naples, FL

 —     3,195 1,403 —   —   3,195 1,403 4,598 107 2001 12/06 40 years

Oxford, MS

 —     440 1,097 —   —   440 1,097 1,537 83 1998 12/06 40 years

Columbiana, AL

 —     771 989 —   —   771 989 1,760 73 1982 01/07 40 years

Naples, FL

 —     3,162 1,597 —   —   3,162 1,597 4,759 115 1995 02/07 40 years

Longs, SC

 —     745 758 —   —   745 758 1,503 53 2001 03/07 40 years

Kentwood, LA

 —     985 891 —   —   985 891 1,876 62 2001 03/07 40 years

Dothan, AL

 —     774 1,886 —   —   774 1,886 2,660 132 2007 03/07 40 years

Naples, FL

 —     2,412 1,589 —   —   2,412 1,589 4,001 104 2000 05/07 40 years

Montgomery, AL

 —     666 1,185 —   —   666 1,185 1,851 75 1998 06/07 40 years

Cary, NC

 —     1,314 2,125 —   —   1,314 2,125 3,439 126 2007 08/07 40 years

Kash n’ Karry:

            

Brandon, FL

 3,031 (p)  322 1,222 —   —   322 1,222 1,544 190 1983 03/99 40 years

Keg Steakhouse:

            

Tacoma, WA

 —     527 795 —   —   527 795 1,322 160 1981 12/01 40 years

Lynnwood, WA

 —     1,256 649 —   —   1,256 649 1,905 131 1992 12/01 40 years

Bellingham, WA

 —     397 456 —   —   397 456 853 92 1981 12/01 40 years

Kerasotes Theatre:

            

Michigan City, IN

 —     1,996 8,422 —   —   1,996 8,422 10,418 482 2005 09/07 40 years

Machesney Park, IL

 —     3,018 8,770 —   —   3,018 8,770 11,788 502 2005 09/07 40 years

New Lenox, IL

 —     6,778 10,980 —   —   6,778 10,980 17,758 629 2004 09/07 40 years

Naperville, IL

 —     6,141 11,624 —   —   6,141 11,624 17,765 666 2006 09/07 40 years

Galesburg, IL

 —     1,205 2,441 —   —   1,205 2,441 3,646 140 2003 09/07 40 years

Evansville, IN

 —     1,300 4,269 —   —   1,300 4,269 5,569 280 1999 09/07 35 years

Bolingbrook, IL

 —     2,937 3,032 —   —   2,937 3,032 5,969 232 1994 09/07 30 years

Bloomington, IN

 —     2,338 4,000 —   —   2,338 4,000 6,338 367 1987 09/07 25 years

Brighton, CO

 —     1,070 5,491 —   —   1,070 5,491 6,561 315 2005 09/07 40 years

Muncie, IN

 —     1,243 5,512 —   —   1,243 5,512 6,755 316 2005 09/07 40 years

Castle Rock, CO

 —     2,905 5,002 —   —   2,905 5,002 7,907 287 2005 09/07 40 years

Lake Delton, WI

 —     2,063 8,366 —   —   2,063 8,366 10,429 468 1999 01/08 35 years

Chicago, IL

 —     7,257 10,955 —   —   7,257 10,955 18,212 536 2007 01/08 40 years

Schererville, IN

 —     6,619 14,225 —   —   6,619 14,225 20,844 929 1996 01/08 30 years

Quincy, IL

 —     1,297 2,850 —   —   1,297 2,850 4,147 159 1982 01/08 35 years

Johnson Creek, WI

 —     1,433 3,932 —   —   1,433 3,932 5,365 220 1997 01/08 35 years

KFC:

            

Fenton, MO

 —     307 496 —   —   307 496 803 264 1985 07/92 33 years

Erie, PA

 —     517 496 —   —   517 496 1,013 100 1996 12/01 40 years

Marysville, WA

 —     647 546 —   —   647 546 1,193 110 1996 12/01 40 years

Evansville, IN

 —     370 767 —   —   370 767 1,137 69 2004 05/06 40 years

Kohl’s:

            

Florence, AL

 —     818 1,047 —   —   818 1,047 1,865 85 2006 06/04 40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 10


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Kum & Go:

            

Omaha, NE

 —     393 214 —   —   393 214 607 49 1979 06/05   20 years

LA Fitness:

            

Centerville, OH

 —     2,700 —   8,572 —   2,700 8,572 11,272 116 2009 06/08 (m)  40 years

Warren, MI

 —     2,360 6,674 —   —   2,360 6,674 9,034 132 2009 07/08 (m)  40 years

Cincinnati, OH

 —     5,145 —   9,011 —   5,145 9,011 14,156 122 2009 08/08 (m)  40 years

Las Margaritas:

            

Indianapolis, IN

 —     640 1,107 —   —   640 1,107 1,747 211 1996 12/01   40 years

Lil’ Champ:

            

Gainesville, FL

 —     900 —   1,800 —   900 1,800 2,700 126 2006 07/05 (m)  40 years

Jacksonville, FL

 —     2,225 3,265 —   —   2,225 3,265 5,490 130 2006 08/05   40 years

Ocala, FL

 —     846 —   1,564 —   846 1,564 2,410 99 2006 02/06 (m)  40 years

Logan’s Roadhouse:

            

San Marcos, TX

 —     837 1,453 —   —   837 1,453 2,290 114 2000 11/06   40 years

Warner Robins, GA

 —     905 1,534 —   —   905 1,534 2,439 120 2004 11/06   40 years

Opelika, AL

 —     1,028 1,753 —   —   1,028 1,753 2,781 137 2005 11/06   40 years

Fort Wayne, IN

 —     1,274 2,110 —   —   1,172 2,110 3,282 165 2003 11/06   40 years

Smyrna, TN

 —     1,335 2,047 —   —   1,335 2,047 3,382 160 2002 11/06   40 years

Sanford, FL

 —     1,678 1,730 —   —   1,678 1,730 3,408 135 1999 11/06   40 years

Jackson, TN

 —     1,200 2,246 —   —   1,200 2,246 3,446 175 1994 11/06   40 years

Greenwood, IN

 —     1,341 2,105 —   —   1,341 2,105 3,446 164 2000 11/06   40 years

Lake Charles, LA

 —     1,285 2,202 —   —   1,285 2,202 3,487 172 1998 11/06   40 years

Cookeville, TN

 —     1,262 2,271 —   —   1,262 2,271 3,533 177 1997 11/06   40 years

Hurst, TX

 —     1,858 1,916 —   —   1,858 1,916 3,774 150 1999 11/06   40 years

McAllen, TX

 —     1,608 2,178 —   —   1,608 2,178 3,786 170 2005 11/06   40 years

Beckley, WV

 —     1,396 2,405 —   —   1,396 2,405 3,801 188 2006 11/06   40 years

Roanoke, VA

 —     2,302 1,947 —   —   2,302 1,947 4,249 152 1998 11/06   40 years

Alexandria, LA

 —     1,218 3,049 —   —   1,218 3,049 4,267 238 1998 11/06   40 years

Southhaven, MS

 —     1,298 1,338 —   —   1,298 1,338 2,636 102 2005 12/06   40 years

Franklin, TN

 —     2,519 1,705 —   —   2,519 1,705 4,224 130 1995 12/06   40 years

Lowe’s:

            

Memphis, TN

 —     3,215 9,170 —   —   3,215 9,170 12,385 1,731 2001 06/02   40 years

M & T Bank:

            

Carlisle, PA

 —     87 103 —   —   87 103 190 10 1988 01/06   40 years

Magic China Café:

            

Orlando, FL

 52 (o)  40 111 —   —   40 111 151 16 2001 02/04   40 years

Majestic Liquors:

            

Hudson Oaks, TX

 —     361 1,029 —   —   361 1,029 1,390 125 1993 02/05   40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

 —     611 1,609 —   —   611 1,609 2,220 196 1974 02/05   40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

 —     988 2,368 —   —   988 2,368 3,356 289 1997 02/05   40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

 —     1,652 2,018 —   —   1,652 2,018 3,670 246 2000 02/05   40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

 —     2,505 2,138 —   —   2,505 2,138 4,643 261 1988 02/05   40 years

Coffee City, TX

 —     1,330 3,858 —   —   1,330 3,858 5,188 470 1996 02/05   40 years

Granbury, TX

 —     786 1,234 —   —   786 1,234 2,020 117 2006 05/05 (g)  40 years

Dallas, TX

 —     1,554 1,229 —   —   1,554 1,229 2,783 140 1982 06/05   40 years

Dallas, TX

 —     2,407 2,299 —   —   2,407 2,299 4,706 255 1971 06/05   40 years

Azle, TX

 —     648 859 —   —   648 859 1,507 55 1970 06/07   40 years

Ft. Worth, TX

 —     575 933 —   —   575 933 1,508 59 1982 06/07   40 years

Lubbock, TX

 —     1,293 1,211 —   —   1,293 1,211 2,504 74 1983 07/07   40 years

Lubbock, TX

 —     2,606 2,898 —   —   2,606 2,898 5,504 178 1983 07/07   40 years

Mattress Firm:

            

Baton Rouge, LA

 —     609 914 —   —   609 914 1,523 320 1995 12/95   40 years

MC Sports:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —     408 2,086 —   —   408 2,086 2,494 120 2007 10/05   40 years

Merchant’s Tires:

            

Washington, DC

 —     624 578 —   —   624 578 1,202 69 1983 03/05   40 years

Rockville, MD

 —     1,030 306 —   —   1,030 306 1,336 37 1974 03/05   40 years

Newport News, VA

 —     234 259 —   —   234 259 493 31 1986 03/05   40 years

Hampton, VA

 —     180 427 —   —   180 427 607 51 1986 03/05   40 years

Norfolk, VA

 —     398 508 —   —   398 508 906 61 1986 03/05   40 years

Mi Pueblo Foods:

            

Palo Alto, CA

 —     2,272 3,405 —   —   2,272 3,405 5,677 919 1998 12/98 (f)  40 years

Michaels:

            

Fairfax, VA

 —     986 2,133 —   —   986 2,133 3,119 463 1995 12/95   40 years

Grapevine, TX (n)

 —     1,018 2,067 —   —   1,018 2,067 3,085 596 1998 06/98   40 years

Plymouth Meeting, PA

 —     2,911 2,595 —   —   2,911 2,595 5,506 629 1999 10/98 (g)  40 years

Michael’s Family Restaurant:

            

Sherman, TX

 —     233 126 24 —   233 150 383 21 1969 09/06   20 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 11


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
 Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Mister Car Wash:

            

Plymouth, MN

 —   827 182 —   —   827 182 1,009 49 1955 04/07 10 years

West St Paul, MN

 —   836 236 —   —   836 236 1,072 32 1972 04/07 20 years

Cedar Rapids, IA

 —   391 816 —   —   391 816 1,207 88 1989 04/07 25 years

Brooklyn Park, MN

 —   438 778 —   —   438 778 1,216 84 1985 04/07 25 years

Roseville, MN

 —   861 564 —   —   861 564 1,425 76 1963 04/07 20 years

Houston, TX

 —   796 678 —   —   796 678 1,474 73 1986 04/07 25 years

Edina, MN

 —   894 687 —   —   894 687 1,581 93 1985 04/07 20 years

Eden Prairie, MN

 —   865 751 —   —   865 751 1,616 102 1984 04/07 20 years

Houston, TX

 —   624 1,108 —   —   624 1,108 1,732 100 1988 04/07 30 years

Clive, IA

 —   1,141 935 —   —   1,141 935 2,076 127 1983 04/07 20 years

Spokane, WA

 —   1,253 1,146 —   —   1,253 1,146 2,399 89 1997 04/07 35 years

Humble, TX

 —   1,204 1,517 —   —   1,204 1,517 2,721 117 1993 04/07 35 years

Houston, TX

 —   1,347 1,702 —   —   1,347 1,702 3,049 154 1984 04/07 30 years

Houston, TX

 —   1,960 1,145 —   —   1,960 1,145 3,105 124 1983 04/07 25 years

Houston, TX

 —   1,846 1,592 —   —   1,846 1,592 3,438 173 1983 04/07 25 years

Houston, TX

 —   2,260 1,806 —   —   2,260 1,806 4,066 196 1975 04/07 25 years

Anoka, MN

 —   212 214 —   —   212 214 426 39 1968 04/07 15 years

Houston, TX

 —   3,193 1,305 —   —   3,193 1,305 4,498 101 1995 04/07 35 years

Stillwater, MN

 —   289 214 —   —   289 214 503 39 1971 04/07 15 years

Sugarland, TX

 —   3,789 1,972 —   —   3,789 1,972 5,761 153 1995 04/07 35 years

St. Cloud, MN

 —   243 391 —   —   243 391 634 53 1986 04/07 20 years

Houston, TX

 —   5,126 1,267 —   —   5,126 1,267 6,393 98 1995 04/07 35 years

Des Moines, IA

 —   213 476 —   —   213 476 689 64 1964 04/07 20 years

Houston, TX

 —   288 466 —   —   288 466 754 84 1970 04/07 15 years

Cottage Grove, MN

 —   274 485 —   —   274 485 759 52 1992 04/07 25 years

Spokane, WA

 —   214 580 —   —   214 580 794 52 1990 04/07 30 years

Des Moines, IA

 —   249 596 —   —   249 596 845 54 1990 04/07 30 years

Rochester, MN

 —   1,055 2,327 —   —   1,055 2,327 3,382 128 2003 10/07 40 years

Rochester, MN

 —   319 451 —   —   319 451 770 25 1994 10/07 40 years

Clearwater, FL

 —   825 765 —   —   825 765 1,590 65 1969 11/07 25 years

Vestavia Hills, AL

 —   1,009 956 —   —   1,009 956 1,965 81 1967 11/07 25 years

Seminole, FL

 —   2,166 1,496 —   —   2,166 1,496 3,662 106 1985 11/07 30 years

Mesquite, TX

 —   1,596 2,201 —   —   1,596 2,201 3,797 187 1987 11/07 25 years

Birmingham, AL

 —   2,378 2,145 —   —   2,378 2,145 4,523 152 1985 11/07 30 years

Tampa, FL

 —   2,993 1,669 —   —   2,993 1,669 4,662 142 1969 11/07 25 years

El Paso, TX

 —   664 824 —   —   664 824 1,488 42 1991 12/07 40 years

El Paso, TX

 —   988 1,046 —   —   988 1,046 2,034 54 1998 12/07 40 years

El Paso, TX

 —   1,424 1,306 —   —   1,424 1,306 2,730 89 1986 12/07 30 years

El Paso, TX

 —   1,399 1,468 —   —   1,399 1,468 2,867 75 1991 12/07 40 years

El Paso, TX

 —   1,807 2,287 —   —   1,807 2,287 4,094 118 1983 12/07 40 years

Mr. E’s Music Supercenter:

            

Arlington, TX

 —   435 2,300 334 —   435 2,634 3,069 775 1996 06/96 38 years

Muchas Gracias Mexican Restaurant:

            

Salem, OR

 —   556 736 —   —   556 736 1,292 148 1996 12/01 40 years

New Covenant Church:

            

Augusta, GA

 —   177 674 —   —   177 674 851 136 1998 12/01 40 years

Nitlantika:

            

Hollywood, FL

 —   386 88 37 —   238 —   238 —   1960 12/05 15 years

Office Depot:

            

Arlington, TX

 —   596 1,411 —   —   596 1,411 2,007 562 1994 01/94 40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 12


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Richmond, VA

 —   889 1,948 —   —   889 1,948 2,837 662 1996 05/96   40 years

Hartsdale, NY

 —   4,509 2,454 —   —   4,509 2,454 6,963 346 1996 09/97   40 years

OfficeMax:

            

Cincinnati, OH

 —   543 1,575 —   —   543 1,575 2,118 609 1994 07/94   40 years

Evanston, IL

 —   1,868 1,758 —   —   1,868 1,758 3,626 640 1995 06/95   40 years

Altamonte Springs, FL

 —   1,690 3,050 —   —   1,690 3,050 4,740 1,058 1995 01/96   40 years

Cutler Ridge, FL

 —   989 1,479 —   —   989 1,479 2,468 500 1995 06/96   40 years

Sacramento, CA

 —   1,144 2,961 —   —   1,144 2,961 4,105 963 1996 12/96   40 years

Salinas, CA

 —   1,353 1,829 —   —   1,353 1,829 3,182 589 1995 02/97   40 years

Redding, CA

 —   667 2,182 —   —   667 2,182 2,849 684 1997 06/97   40 years

Kelso, WA

 —   868 —   1,806 —   868 1,806 2,674 540 1998 09/97 (g)  40 years

Lynchburg, VA

 —   562 —   1,851 —   562 1,851 2,413 523 1998 02/98   40 years

Leesburg, FL

 —   640 —   1,929 —   640 1,929 2,569 532 1998 08/98   40 years

Tigard, OR

 —   1,540 2,247 —   —   1,540 2,247 3,787 625 1995 11/98   40 years

Griffin, GA

 —   685 —   1,802 —   685 1,802 2,487 482 1999 11/98 (g)  40 years

Orlando Metro Gymnastics:

            

Orlando, FL

 —   428 1,345 —   —   428 1,345 1,773 167 2003 01/05   40 years

Palais Royale:

            

Sealy, TX

 —   457 504 1,634 —   462 2,134 2,596 206 1982 03/99   40 years

Patriot Fuels:

            

Vinita, OK

 —   72 368 —   —   72 368 440 5 1972 07/09   20 years

Pennstar Bank:

            

Dallas, PA

 —   214 345 —   —   214 345 559 75 1995 08/05   20 years

Pep Boys:

            

Jacksonville, FL

 —   810 2,331 —   —   810 2,331 3,141 142 1989 11/07   35 years

Roswell, GA

 —   931 2,732 —   —   931 2,732 3,663 194 2007 11/07   30 years

Guayama, PR

 —   1,729 2,732 —   —   1,729 2,131 3,860 5 1998 11/07   33 years

Reading, PA

 —   1,189 3,367 —   —   1,189 2,819 4,008 9 1989 11/07   28 years

Lansing, IL

 —   869 3,440 —   —   869 3,440 4,309 209 1993 11/07   35 years

Quakertown, PA

 —   1,129 3,252 —   —   1,129 3,252 4,381 197 1995 11/07   35 years

Las Vegas, NV

 —   1,917 2,530 —   —   1,917 2,530 4,447 154 1989 11/07   35 years

Turnersville, NJ

 —   990 3,494 —   —   990 3,494 4,484 247 1986 11/07   30 years

Chicago, IL

 —   1,077 3,756 —   —   1,077 3,756 4,833 228 1993 11/07   35 years

Marietta, GA

 —   1,311 3,556 —   —   1,311 3,556 4,867 252 1987 11/07   30 years

Cicero, IL

 —   1,341 3,760 —   —   1,341 3,760 5,101 228 1993 11/07   35 years

Philadelphia, PA

 —   1,300 3,830 —   —   1,300 3,830 5,130 233 1995 11/07   35 years

Cornwell Heights, PA

 —   2,058 3,102 —   —   2,058 3,102 5,160 264 1972 11/07   25 years

Joliet, IL

 —   1,506 3,727 —   —   1,506 3,727 5,233 226 1993 11/07   35 years

Marlton, NJ

 —   1,608 4,142 —   —   1,608 4,142 5,750 293 1983 11/07   30 years

East Brunswick, NJ

 —   2,449 5,026 —   —   2,449 5,026 7,475 356 1987 11/07   30 years

Perkins Restaurant:

            

Des Moines, IA

 —   256 136 —   —   256 136 392 62 1976 06/05   10 years

Des Moines, IA

 —   226 203 —   —   226 203 429 92 1976 06/05   10 years

Des Moines, IA

 —   270 218 —   —   270 218 488 99 1977 06/05   10 years

Newton, IA

 —   354 402 —   —   354 402 756 182 1979 06/05   10 years

Urbandale, IA

 —   377 581 —   —   377 581 958 132 1979 06/05   20 years

Pet Paradise:

            

Houston, TX

 —   417 2,306 —   —   417 2,306 2,723 103 2008 03/08   40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 13


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Bunnell, FL

 —   316 881 —   —   316 881 1,197 38 1997 04/08   40 years

Houston, TX

 —   535 —   3,426 —   535 3,426 3,961 61 2009 09/08 (m)  40 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   825 —   3,231 —   825 3,231 4,056 37 2009 11/08 (m)  40 years

Davie, FL

 —   1,138 1,069 —   —   1,138 1,069 2,207 32 2003 12/08   35 years

Petco:

            

Grand Forks, ND

 —   307 910 —   —   307 910 1,217 274 1996 12/97   40 years

Petro Express:

            

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,025 1,605 —   —   1,025 1,605 2,630 145 1986 04/07   30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   507 698 —   —   507 698 1,205 95 1967 04/07   20 years

Lincolnton, NC

 —   723 532 —   —   723 532 1,255 48 1989 04/07   30 years

Mineral Springs, NC

 —   678 577 —   —   678 577 1,255 39 2002 04/07   40 years

Monroe, NC

 —   421 834 —   —   421 834 1,255 65 1997 04/07   35 years

Waxhaw, NC

 —   508 747 —   —   508 747 1,255 51 2002 04/07   40 years

Rock Hill, SC

 —   778 727 —   —   778 727 1,505 66 1990 04/07   30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   629 876 —   —   629 876 1,505 79 1986 04/07   30 years

Gastonia, NC

 —   745 760 —   —   745 760 1,505 51 2003 04/07   40 years

Monroe, NC

 —   709 796 —   —   709 796 1,505 62 1999 04/07   35 years

Monroe, NC

 —   857 1,023 —   —   857 1,023 1,880 69 2004 04/07   40 years

Conover, NC

 —   917 1,275 —   —   917 1,275 2,192 99 1999 04/07   35 years

Gastonia, NC

 —   965 1,228 —   —   965 1,228 2,193 95 2001 04/07   35 years

Kings Mountain, NC

 —   1,210 982 —   —   1,210 982 2,192 76 1988 04/07   35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,323 870 —   —   1,323 870 2,193 79 1982 04/07   30 years

Gastonia, NC

 —   1,070 1,185 —   —   1,070 1,185 2,255 92 1990 04/07   35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,037 1,468 —   —   1,037 1,468 2,505 114 1997 04/07   35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,030 1,725 —   —   1,030 1,725 2,755 156 1983 04/07   30 years

Thomasville, NC

 —   994 1,761 —   —   994 1,761 2,755 136 2000 04/07   35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,258 1,560 —   —   1,258 1,560 2,818 106 2004 04/07   40 years

Matthews, NC

 —   1,197 1,746 —   —   1,197 1,746 2,943 158 1987 04/07   30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,340 1,790 —   —   1,340 1,790 3,130 139 1998 04/07   35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,293 1,837 —   —   1,293 1,837 3,130 166 1987 04/07   30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,291 1,839 —   —   1,291 1,839 3,130 166 1988 04/07   30 years

Belmont, NC

 —   1,508 1,622 —   —   1,508 1,622 3,130 126 2001 04/07   35 years

Lake Wylie, SC

 —   1,972 1,283 —   —   1,972 1,283 3,255 99 2003 04/07   35 years

Fort Mill, SC

 —   1,883 1,559 —   —   1,883 1,559 3,442 141 1988 04/07   30 years

Lake Wylie, SC

 —   1,381 2,061 —   —   1,381 2,061 3,442 160 1998 04/07   35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,458 2,047 —   —   1,458 2,047 3,505 185 1987 04/07   30 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,532 1,973 —   —   1,532 1,973 3,505 153 1998 04/07   35 years

Hickory, NC

 —   1,975 1,530 —   —   1,975 1,530 3,505 118 2002 04/07   35 years

Concord, NC

 —   1,828 1,677 —   —   1,828 1,677 3,505 130 2002 04/07   35 years

York, SC

 —   2,306 1,449 —   —   2,306 1,449 3,755 112 1999 04/07   35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,778 1,977 —   —   1,778 1,977 3,755 178 1992 04/07   30 years

Rock Hill, SC

 —   2,119 1,886 —   —   2,119 1,886 4,005 146 1998 04/07   35 years

Statesville, NC

 —   1,886 2,182 —   —   1,886 2,182 4,068 169 1999 04/07   35 years

Denver, NC

 —   2,317 1,750 —   —   2,317 1,750 4,067 135 1999 04/07   35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,697 2,419 —   —   1,697 2,419 4,116 164 2005 04/07   40 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   2,165 1,965 —   —   2,165 1,965 4,130 152 1997 04/07   35 years

Concord, NC

 —   2,144 1,986 —   —   2,144 1,986 4,130 154 2000 04/07   35 years

Lincolnton, NC

 —   2,359 1,771 —   —   2,359 1,771 4,130 137 2000 04/07   35 years

Cornelius, NC

 —   1,653 2,664 —   —   1,653 2,664 4,317 206 2000 04/07   35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,810 2,570 —   —   1,810 2,570 4,380 174 2004 04/07   40 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   2,316 2,064 —   —   2,316 2,064 4,380 160 1996 04/07   35 years

Rock Hill, SC

 —   3,095 1,910 —   —   3,095 1,910 5,005 148 1999 04/07   35 years

Fort Mill, SC

 —   3,825 2,554 —   —   3,825 2,554 6,379 198 1998 04/07   35 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   2,784 3,720 —   —   2,784 3,720 6,504 288 1998 04/07   35 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 14


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Charlotte, NC

 —   429 425 —   —   429 425 854 38 1983 04/07   30 years

Gastonia, NC

 —   335 545 —   —   335 545 880 37 2000 04/07   40 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,231 1,214 —   —   1,231 1,214 2,445 80 1997 05/07   40 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   1,849 2,280 —   —   1,849 2,280 4,129 150 2005 05/07   40 years

Rock Hill, SC

 —   3,108 2,146 —   —   3,108 2,146 5,254 141 1999 05/07   40 years

PetSmart:

            

Chicago, IL

 —   2,724 3,566 —   —   2,724 3,566 6,290 1,007 1998 09/98   40 years

Pier I Imports:

            

Anchorage, AK

 —   928 1,663 —   —   928 1,663 2,591 575 1995 02/96   40 years

Memphis, TN

 —   713 822 —   —   713 822 1,535 258 1997 09/96 (f)  40 years

Sanford, FL

 —   738 803 —   —   738 803 1,541 237 1998 06/97 (f)  40 years

Harlingen, TX

 —   317 756 —   —   317 756 1,073 193 1999 11/98 (f)  40 years

Valdosta, GA

 —   391 806 —   —   391 806 1,197 204 1999 01/99 (f)  40 years

Pizza Hut:

            

Monroeville, AL

 —   547 44 —   —   547 44 591 9 1976 12/01   40 years

Popeye’s:

            

Snellville, GA

 —   642 437 —   —   642 437 1,079 88 1995 12/01   40 years

Pueblo Viejo Restaurant:

            

Chandler, AZ

 —   655 791 —   —   655 791 1,446 162 1997 12/01   40 years

Pull-A-Part:

            

Augusta, GA

 —   1,414 —   1,451 —   1,414 1,451 2,865 92 2007 08/06 (m)  40 years

Norcross, GA

 —   1,831 1,040 —   —   1,831 1,040 2,871 88 1998 08/06   40 years

Conley, GA

 —   1,686 1,387 —   —   1,686 1,387 3,073 117 1999 08/06   40 years

Birmingham, AL

 —   1,165 2,090 —   —   1,165 2,090 3,255 176 1964 08/06   40 years

Knoxville, TN

 —   961 2,384 —   —   961 2,384 3,345 147 2007 08/06 (m)  40 years

Nashville, TN

 —   2,164 1,414 —   —   2,164 1,414 3,578 119 2006 08/06   40 years

Charlotte, NC

 —   2,913 1,724 —   —   2,913 1,724 4,637 145 2006 08/06   40 years

Louisville, KY

 —   3,206 1,532 —   —   3,206 1,532 4,738 129 2006 08/06   40 years

Harvey, LA

 —   1,887 —   4,326 —   1,887 4,326 6,213 158 2008 08/06 (m)  40 years

Lafayette, LA

 —   1,036 —   2,226 —   1,036 2,226 3,262 114 2007 08/06 (m)  40 years

Cleveland, OH

 —   4,556 —   2,096 —   4,556 2,096 6,652 111 2007 08/06 (m)  40 years

Montgomery, AL

 —   934 —   2,013 —   934 2,013 2,947 107 2007 11/06 (m)  40 years

Jackson, MS

 —   1,315 2,471 —   —   1,315 2,471 3,786 100 2008 12/06 (m)  40 years

Baton Rouge, LA

 —   893 —   3,256 —   893 3,256 4,149 64 2009 01/07 (m)  40 years

Memphis, TN

 —   1,779 —   2,964 —   1,779 2,964 4,743 120 2008 05/07 (m)  40 years

Mobile, AL

 —   550 —   2,772 —   550 2,772 3,322 66 2009 06/07 (m)  40 years

Winston-Salem, NC

 —   846 —   2,449 —   846 2,449 3,295 64 2009 08/07 (m)  40 years

Lithonia, GA

 —   2,410 —   2,345 —   2,410 2,345 4,755 56 2009 08/07 (m)  40 years

Columbia, SC

 —   935 2,178 —   —   935 2,178 3,113 52 2009 09/07 (m)  40 years

Akron, OH

 —   1,065 —   1,869 —   1,065 1,869 2,934 6 2009 10/08 (m)  40 years

QuikTrip:

            

Des Moines, IA

 —   259 792 —   —   259 792 1,051 120 1996 06/05   30 years

Urbandale, IA

 —   340 764 —   —   340 764 1,104 87 1993 06/05   40 years

Norcross, GA

 —   844 297 —   —   839 297 1,136 45 1994 06/05   30 years

Norcross, GA

 —   966 202 —   —   966 202 1,168 31 1993 06/05   30 years

Clive, IA

 —   623 557 —   —   623 557 1,180 84 1994 06/05   30 years

Norcross, GA

 —   948 294 —   —   948 294 1,242 44 1989 06/05   30 years

Gainesville, GA

 —   592 913 —   —   592 913 1,505 138 1989 06/05   30 years

Woodstock, GA

 —   488 1,042 —   —   488 1,042 1,530 118 1997 06/05   40 years

Lee’s Summit, MO

 —   374 1,224 —   —   374 1,224 1,598 139 1999 06/05   40 years

Alpharetta, GA

 —   1,048 607 —   —   1,048 607 1,655 69 1996 06/05   40 years

Tulsa, OK

 —   1,225 650 —   —   1,225 650 1,875 98 1990 06/05   30 years

Olathe, KS

 —   793 1,392 —   —   793 1,392 2,185 158 1999 06/05   40 years

Herculaneum, MO

 —   856 1,613 —   —   856 1,613 2,469 244 1991 06/05   30 years

Wichita, KS

 —   118 454 —   —   113 454 567 69 1989 06/05   30 years

Wichita, KS

 —   127 543 —   —   127 543 670 82 1990 06/05   30 years

Johnston, IA

 —   394 385 —   —   394 385 779 58 1991 06/05   30 years

Des Moines, IA

 —   379 455 —   —   379 455 834 69 1990 06/05   30 years

Quizno’s:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —   29 211 —   —   29 211 240 13 2007 10/05   40 years

Qwest Corporation Service Center:

            

Decorah, IA

 —   72 272 —   —   72 272 344 123 1974 06/05   10 years

Cedar Rapids, IA

 —   184 629 —   —   184 629 813 143 1976 06/05   20 years

Rallys:

            

Toledo, OH

 —   126 320 —   —   126 320 446 144 1989 07/92   39 years

REB Oil:

            

Deerfield Beach, FL

 —   770 274 —   —   770 274 1,044 28 1980 12/05   40 years

Lake Placid, FL

 —   2,532 1,157 491 —   2,532 1,648 4,180 136 1990 12/05   40 years

Reliable Life Insurance:

            

St. Louis, MO

 —   2,078 13,762 —   —   2,076 13,762 15,838 1,881 1975 05/04   40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 15


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Retail Operations: (h)

            

Ventura, CA

 —   5,590 4,431 —   —   5,590 4,431 10,021 200 2001 03/08   40 years

Ventura, CA

 —   6,253 4,560 —   —   6,253 4,560 10,813 235 1994 03/08   35 years

Bakersfield, CA

 —   2,099 2,011 —   —   1,759 —   1,759 93 1990 03/08   35 years

Bakersfield, CA

 —   3,303 3,845 —   —   1,978 —   1,978 268 1975 03/08   25 years

Bakersfield, CA

 —   2,798 5,260 —   —   2,044 —   2,044 263 1997 03/08   35 years

Bakersfield, CA

 —   2,043 3,520 —   —   2,043 680 2,723 195 1988 03/08   30 years

Bakersfield, CA

 —   1,643 1,959 —   —   530 —   530 137 1975 03/08   25 years

Bakersfield, CA

 —   3,363 3,288 —   —   3,363 3,288 6,651 147 2002 03/08   40 years

Bakersfield, CA

 —   2,564 4,465 —   —   2,564 4,465 7,029 264 1988 03/08   30 years

Bakersfield, CA

 —   3,664 3,709 —   —   3,664 3,709 7,373 190 1994 03/08   35 years

San Fernando, CA

 —   6,630 2,706 —   —   6,630 2,706 9,336 167 1988 03/08   30 years

Bakersfield, CA

 —   3,346 6,016 —   —   3,346 6,016 9,362 305 1998 03/08   35 years

Rite Aid:

            

Douglasville, GA

 —   413 995 —   —   413 995 1,408 346 1996 01/96   40 years

Conyers, GA

 —   575 999 —   —   575 999 1,574 313 1997 06/97   40 years

Augusta, GA

 —   569 1,327 —   —   502 1,327 1,829 399 1997 12/97   40 years

Riverdale, GA

 —   1,089 1,707 —   —   1,089 1,707 2,796 514 1997 12/97   40 years

Warner Robins, GA

 —   707 —   1,227 —   707 1,227 1,934 336 1999 03/98 (g)  40 years

Mobile, AL

 —   1,137 1,694 —   —   1,137 1,694 2,831 341 2000 12/01   40 years

Orange Beach, AL

 —   1,410 1,996 —   —   1,410 1,996 3,406 401 2000 12/01   40 years

West Mifflin, PA

 —   1,402 2,044 —   —   1,402 2,044 3,446 402 1999 02/02   40 years

Norfolk, VA

 —   2,742 1,797 —   —   2,742 1,797 4,539 354 2001 02/02   40 years

Thorndale, PA

 —   2,261 2,472 —   —   2,261 2,472 4,733 487 2001 02/02   40 years

Saratoga Springs, NY

 —   762 591 —   —   762 591 1,353 78 1993 09/04   40 years

Albany, NY (n)

 —   34 824 —   —   34 824 858 109 1992 09/04   40 years

Hudson Falls, NY

 —   57 780 39 —   57 819 876 106 1990 09/04   40 years

Albany, NY

 —   25 867 —   —   25 867 892 115 1994 09/04   40 years

Monticello, NY

 706 664 769 —   —   664 769 1,433 92 1996 03/05   40 years

Rite Rug:

            

Columbus, OH

 —   1,596 934 13 —   1,605 939 2,544 120 1970 11/04   40 years

Road Ranger:

            

Springfield, IL

 —   705 1,500 —   —   705 1,500 2,205 133 1997 06/06   40 years

Rockford, IL

 —   623 1,331 —   —   623 1,331 1,954 118 2000 06/06   40 years

Belvidere, IL

 —   748 1,256 —   —   748 1,256 2,004 111 1997 06/06   40 years

Decatur, IL

 —   815 1,314 —   —   815 1,314 2,129 116 2002 06/06   40 years

Mendota, IL

 —   959 1,296 —   —   959 1,296 2,255 115 1996 06/06   40 years

Dekalb, IL

 —   747 1,658 —   —   747 1,658 2,405 147 2000 06/06   40 years

Rockford, IL

 —   1,094 1,662 —   —   1,094 1,662 2,756 147 1996 06/06   40 years

Brazil, IN

 —   2,199 907 —   —   2,199 907 3,106 80 1990 06/06   40 years

Cherry Valley, IL

 —   1,409 1,897 —   —   1,409 1,897 3,306 168 1991 06/06   40 years

Oakdale, WI

 —   1,844 1,663 —   —   1,844 1,663 3,507 147 1998 06/06   40 years

Springfield, IL

 —   1,795 1,863 —   —   1,795 1,863 3,658 165 1978 06/06   40 years

Cottage Grove, WI

 —   2,175 1,733 —   —   2,175 1,733 3,908 153 1990 06/06   40 years

Elk Run Heights, IA

 —   1,538 2,470 —   —   1,538 2,470 4,008 219 1989 06/06   40 years

Lake Station, IN

 —   3,172 1,112 —   —   3,172 1,112 4,284 98 1987 06/06   40 years

DeKalb, IL

 —   505 1,503 —   —   505 1,503 2,008 108 2004 02/07   40 years

Princeton, IL

 —   1,141 3,066 —   —   1,141 3,066 4,207 220 2003 02/07   40 years

Hampshire, IL

 —   1,307 1,501 1,629 —   1,307 3,130 4,437 193 1988 02/07 (f)  40 years

Fenton, MO

 —   2,584 2,622 —   —   2,584 2,622 5,206 188 2007 02/07   40 years

Champaign, IL

 —   3,241 2,008 —   —   3,241 2,008 5,249 144 2006 02/07   40 years

South Beloit, IL

 —   3,824 2,309 —   —   3,824 2,309 6,133 166 2002 02/07   40 years

Marion, IA

 —   737 1,071 —   —   737 1,071 1,808 75 1974 03/07   40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 16


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements  Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Cedar Rapids, IA

 —   1,025 984 —     —   1,025 984 2,009 69 1990 03/07   40 years

Okawville, IL

 —   930 1,147 —     —   930 1,147 2,077 68 1997 08/07   40 years

Dubuque, IA

 —   561 1,941 —     —   561 1,941 2,502 111 2000 09/07   40 years

Belvidere, IL

 —   521 1,053 —     —   521 1,053 1,574 56 2008 09/07 (f)  40 years

South Beloit, IL

 —   1,182 1,324 —     —   1,182 1,324 2,506 70 2008 09/07 (f)  40 years

Florence, KY

 —   615 1,242 —     —   615 1,242 1,857 61 1990 04/08   35 years

Covington, KY

 —   486 1,420 —     —   486 1,420 1,906 69 1996 04/08   35 years

Alexandria, KY

 —   624 1,306 —     —   624 1,306 1,930 64 1993 04/08   35 years

Florence, KY

 —   741 1,272 —     —   741 1,272 2,013 62 1994 04/08   35 years

Florence, KY

 —   884 1,557 —     —   884 1,557 2,441 76 1995 04/08   35 years

Dry Ridge, KY

 —   892 1,946 —     —   892 1,946 2,838 111 1973 04/08   30 years

Wilder, KY

 —   954 1,902 —     —   954 1,902 2,856 93 1994 04/08   35 years

Hebron, KY

 —   1,522 2,984 —     —   1,522 2,984 4,506 146 1996 04/08   35 years

Robb & Stucky:

            

Ft. Myers, FL

 —   2,188 6,225 —     —   2,188 6,225 8,413 1,895 1997 12/97   40 years

Roger & Marv’s:

            

Kenosha, WI

 —   1,918 3,431 —     —   1,918 3,431 5,349 1,100 1992 02/97   40 years

Roni Deutch Tax Services:

            

Hollywood, FL

 —   202 46 19   —   123 —   123 —   1960 12/05   15 years

Ross Dress for Less:

            

Coral Gables, FL

 —   1,782 1,661 —     —   1,782 1,661 3,443 513 1994 06/96   38 years

Lodi, CA

 —   614 1,415 —     —   614 1,415 2,029 220 1984 03/99   40 years

Rue 21:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —   126 645 —     —   126 645 771 37 2007 10/05   40 years

Sally Beauty Supply:

            

Lapeer, MI

 —   33 167 —     —   33 167 200 10 2007 10/05   40 years

Schlotzsky’s Deli:

            

Phoenix, AZ

 —   706 315 —     —   706 315 1,021 63 1995 12/01   40 years

Scottsdale, AZ

 —   717 311 —     —   717 311 1,028 62 1995 12/01   40 years

Season’s 52:

            

Schaumburg, IL

 —   2,065 1,311 —     —   2,065 1,311 3,376 264 1998 12/01   40 years

Shek’s Chinese Express:

            

Eden Prairie, MN

 —   65 261 —     —   65 261 326 50 1997 12/01   40 years

Shoes on a Shoestring:

            

Albuquerque, NM

 —   1,442 2,335 —     —   1,442 2,335 3,777 732 1997 06/97   40 years

Shop ‘n Save:

            

Homestead, PA

 —   1,139 —   2,158 (j)  —   1,139 2,158 3,297 305 1994 02/97   31 years

Shop-a-Snak:

            

Chelsea, AL

 —   391 628 —     —   391 628 1,019 57 1981 05/06   40 years

Jasper, AL

 —   551 747 —     —   551 747 1,298 68 1998 05/06   40 years

Bessemer, AL

 —   564 742 —     —   564 742 1,306 67 2002 05/06   40 years

Birmingham, AL

 —   361 744 —     —   361 744 1,105 67 1989 05/06   40 years

Hoover, AL

 —   446 672 —     —   446 672 1,118 61 1989 05/06   40 years

Tuscaloosa, AL

 —   386 733 —     —   386 733 1,119 66 1991 05/06   40 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 17


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Homewood, AL

 —   468 657 —   —   468 657   1,125 60   1990   05/06   40 years  

Birmingham, AL

 —   439 704 —   —   439 704   1,143 64   1989   05/06   40 years  

Birmingham, AL

 —   490 769 —   —   490 769   1,259 70   1992   05/06   40 years  

Hoover, AL

 —   713 865 —   —   713 865   1,578 78   1998   05/06   40 years  

Hoover, AL

 —   764 1,157 —   —   663 1,157   1,820 105   2005   05/06   40 years  

Trussville, AL

 —   272 542 —   —   272 542   814 49   1992   05/06   40 years  

Tuscaloosa, AL

 —   525 463 —   —   525 463   988 42   1991   05/06   40 years  

Tuscaloosa, AL

 —   432 559 —   —   432 559   991 51   1991   05/06   40 years  

SOAKS Express Wash:

            

Ankeny, IA

 —   662 —   —   —   662 (e 662 (e (e 06/05   (e

Sonic Automotive:

            

Charlotte, NC

 —   3,619 4,854 —   —   3,619 4,854   8,473 319   1996   05/07   40 years  

Spec’s Liquor and Fine Foods:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

 —   777 918 542 —   777 1,460   2,237 366   1967   11/93   40 years  

Spencer’s Air Conditioning & Appliance:

           

Glendale, AZ

 —   342 982 —   —   342 982   1,324 256   1999   12/98 (g)  40 years  

Sports Authority:

            

Tampa, FL

 —   2,128 1,522 —   —   2,128 1,522   3,650 514   1994   06/96   40 years  

Sarasota, FL

 —   1,428 1,703 —   —   1,428 1,703   3,131 252   1996   09/97   40 years  

Memphis, TN (n)

 —   820 —   2,573 —   820 2,573   3,393 721   1998   12/97 (g)  40 years  

Little Rock, AR

 —   3,113 2,660 —   —   3,113 2,660   5,773 751   1997   09/98   40 years  

Iselin, NJ

 —   3,750 5,983 —   —   3,750 5,983   9,733 1,041   1994   01/03   40 years  

Stone Mountain Chevrolet:

            

Lilburn, GA

 —   3,027 4,685 —   —   3,027 4,685   7,712 630   2004   08/04   40 years  

Stop N Go:

            

Kennedale, TX

 —   400 692 —   —   391 692   1,083 139   1985   12/01   40 years  

Grand Prairie, TX

 —   421 685 —   —   421 685   1,106 138   1986   12/01   40 years  

Stripes:

            

Laredo, TX

 —   841 739 —   —   841 739   1,580 75   2001   12/05   40 years  

Wichita Falls, TX

 —   440 751 —   —   440 751   1,191 76   1984   12/05   40 years  

Laredo, TX

 —   675 533 —   —   675 533   1,208 54   1993   12/05   40 years  

Wichita Falls, TX

 —   484 828 —   —   484 828   1,312 84   1983   12/05   40 years  

Harlingen, TX

 —   755 601 —   —   755 601   1,356 61   1987   12/05   40 years  

Laredo, TX

 —   736 670 —   —   736 670   1,406 68   1984   12/05   40 years  

Portland, TX

 —   656 915 —   —   656 915   1,571 92   1983   12/05   40 years  

Pharr, TX

 —   784 805 —   —   784 805   1,589 81   2000   12/05   40 years  

Brownsville, TX

 —   933 699 —   —   933 699   1,632 71   1999   12/05   40 years  

Lawton, OK

 —   697 964 —   —   697 964   1,661 97   1984   12/05   40 years  

Corpus Christi, TX

 —   703 1,037 —   —   703 1,037   1,740 105   1986   12/05   40 years  

Harlingen, TX

 —   906 953 —   —   906 953   1,859 96   1991   12/05   40 years  

McAllen, TX

 —   987 893 —   —   987 893   1,880 90   1999   12/05   40 years  

Harlingen, TX

 —   754 1,152 —   —   754 1,152   1,906 116   1999   12/05   40 years  

George West, TX

 —   1,243 695 —   —   1,243 695   1,938 70   1996   12/05   40 years  

Mission, TX

 —   880 1,101 —   —   880 1,101   1,981 111   1999   12/05   40 years  

McAllen, TX

 —   975 1,030 —   —   975 1,030   2,005 104   2003   12/05   40 years  

Donna, TX

 —   1,004 1,127 —   —   1,004 1,127   2,131 114   1995   12/05   40 years  

Pharr, TX

 —   982 1,178 —   —   982 1,178   2,160 119   1988   12/05   40 years  

Brownsville, TX

 —   1,039 1,145 —   —   1,039 1,145   2,184 116   2004   12/05   40 years  

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 18


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
 Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

La Feria, TX

 —   900 1,347 —   —   900 1,347 2,247 136 1988 12/05 40 years

Wichita Falls, TX

 —   905 1,351 —   —   905 1,351 2,256 136 2000 12/05 40 years

Edinburg, TX

 —   970 1,286 —   —   970 1,286 2,256 130 2003 12/05 40 years

Corpus Christi, TX

 —   853 1,416 —   —   853 1,416 2,269 143 2005 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

 —   1,182 1,105 —   —   1,182 1,105 2,287 112 2000 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

 —   1,279 1,015 —   —   1,279 1,015 2,294 103 1990 12/05 40 years

San Juan, TX

 —   1,124 1,172 —   —   1,124 1,172 2,296 118 1996 12/05 40 years

Freer, TX

 —   1,151 1,158 —   —   1,151 1,158 2,309 117 1984 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

 —   1,015 1,308 —   —   1,015 1,308 2,323 132 2003 12/05 40 years

Mission, TX

 —   1,125 1,213 —   —   1,125 1,213 2,338 123 2003 12/05 40 years

San Benito, TX

 —   791 1,857 —   —   791 1,857 2,648 188 1994 12/05 40 years

San Benito, TX

 —   1,103 1,586 —   —   1,103 1,586 2,689 160 2005 12/05 40 years

South Padre Island, TX

 —   1,367 1,389 —   —   1,367 1,389 2,756 140 1988 12/05 40 years

Corpus Christi, TX

 —   1,385 1,419 —   —   1,385 1,419 2,804 143 1982 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

 —   1,392 1,444 —   —   1,392 1,444 2,836 146 2005 12/05 40 years

Los Indios, TX

 —   1,387 1,457 —   —   1,387 1,457 2,844 147 2005 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   1,495 1,400 —   —   1,495 1,400 2,895 142 1993 12/05 40 years

Corpus Christi, TX

 —   1,400 1,531 —   —   1,400 1,531 2,931 155 1984 12/05 40 years

Edinburg, TX

 —   1,317 1,624 —   —   1,317 1,624 2,941 164 1999 12/05 40 years

San Juan, TX

 —   1,424 1,546 —   —   1,424 1,546 2,970 156 2004 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

 —   1,843 1,419 —   —   1,843 1,419 3,262 143 2000 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

 —   2,033 1,288 —   —   2,033 1,288 3,321 130 1995 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   1,553 1,775 —   —   1,553 1,775 3,328 179 2000 12/05 40 years

Port Isabel, TX

 —   2,062 1,299 —   —   2,062 1,299 3,361 131 1994 12/05 40 years

Corpus Christi, TX

 —   1,308 2,151 —   —   1,308 2,151 3,459 217 1995 12/05 40 years

Progreso, TX

 —   1,769 1,811 —   —   1,769 1,811 3,580 183 1999 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

 —   2,530 1,125 —   —   2,530 1,125 3,655 114 1990 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

 —   2,417 1,828 —   —   2,417 1,828 4,245 185 2000 12/05 40 years

Pharr, TX

 —   2,426 1,881 —   —   2,426 1,881 4,307 190 2003 12/05 40 years

Riviera, TX

 —   2,351 2,158 —   —   2,351 2,158 4,509 218 2005 12/05 40 years

Brownsville, TX

 —   2,915 1,800 —   —   2,915 1,800 4,715 182 2000 12/05 40 years

Olmito, TX

 —   3,688 2,880 —   —   3,688 2,880 6,568 291 2002 12/05 40 years

Falfurias, TX

 —   4,244 4,458 —   —   4,213 4,458 8,671 450 2002 12/05 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   459 460 —   —   459 460 919 46 1983 12/05 40 years

Palmview, TX

 —   835 1,372 —   —   835 1,372 2,207 110 2005 10/06 40 years

San Juan, TX

 —   816 1,434 —   —   816 1,434 2,250 109 2006 12/06 40 years

Harlingen, TX

 —   638 1,807 —   —   638 1,807 2,445 137 2006 12/06 40 years

Zapata, TX

 —   1,333 1,773 —   —   1,333 1,773 3,106 135 2006 12/06 40 years

Rio Grande City, TX

 —   1,871 1,612 —   —   1,871 1,612 3,483 123 2006 12/06 40 years

Orange Grove, TX

 —   1,767 1,838 —   —   1,767 1,838 3,605 124 2007 04/07 40 years

Laredo, TX

 —   448 734 —   —   448 734 1,182 52 1981 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

 —   468 728 —   —   468 728 1,196 52 1973 11/07 30 years

Harlingen, TX

 —   408 826 —   —   408 826 1,234 58 1982 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

 —   348 1,168 —   —   348 1,168 1,516 83 1983 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

 —   584 958 —   —   584 958 1,542 68 1981 11/07 30 years

San Benito, TX

 —   420 1,135 —   —   420 1,135 1,555 80 1985 11/07 30 years

Laredo, TX

 —   698 1,169 —   —   698 1,169 1,867 83 1981 11/07 30 years

Kerrville, TX

 —   640 1,616 —   —   640 1,616 2,256 86 1996 11/07 40 years

Del Rio, TX

 —   1,565 758 —   —   1,565 758 2,323 40 1996 11/07 40 years

Monahans, TX

 —   2,628 2,973 —   —   2,628 2,973 5,601 158 1996 11/07 40 years

Odessa, TX

 —   2,633 3,199 —   —   2,633 3,199 5,832 170 2006 11/07 40 years

San Angelo, TX

 —   194 471 —   —   194 471 665 25 1998 11/07 40 years

Pharr, TX

 —   573 1,229 —   —   573 1,229 1,802 63 2000 12/07 40 years

Harlingen, TX

 —   277 808 —   —   277 808 1,085 53 1983 01/08 30 years

Laredo, TX

 —   325 816 —   —   325 816 1,141 53 1983 01/08 30 years

Port Isabel, TX

 —   299 855 —   —   299 855 1,154 56 1983 01/08 30 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 19


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Harlingen, TX

 —   329 935 —   —   329 935   1,264 61   1980 01/08   30 years  

McAllen, TX

 —   643 1,776 —   —   643 1,776   2,419 116   1980 01/08   30 years  

Brownsville, TX

 —   843 1,429 —   —   843 1,429   2,272 58   2007 05/08   40 years  

Laredo, TX

 —   879 1,593 —   —   879 1,593   2,472 65   2007 05/08   40 years  

Edinburg, TX

 —   834 1,787 —   —   834 1,787   2,621 73   2007 05/08   40 years  

La Villa, TX

 —   710 2,166 —   —   710 2,166   2,876 88   2007 05/08   40 years  

Laredo, TX

 —   1,183 1,934 —   —   1,183 1,934   3,117 79   2007 05/08   40 years  

McAllen, TX

 —   1,270 2,383 —   —   1,270 2,383   3,653 129   1986 05/08   30 years  

Houston, TX

 —   696 1,458 —   —   696 1,458   2,154 38   2008 12/08   40 years  

Lubbock, TX

 —   671 1,612 —   —   671 1,612   2,283 42   2007 12/08   40 years  

Subway:

            

Eden Prairie, MN

 —   54 150 67 —   54 218   272 41   1997 12/01   40 years  

Cohoes, NY

 —   22 116 1 —   22 117   139 15   1994 09/04   40 years  

Albany, NY

 —   3 67 —   —   3 67   70 9   1992 09/04   40 years  

Sunshine Energy:

            

Kansas City, MO

 —   517 720 —   —   532 720   1,252 13   1993 07/09   25 years  

Neosho, MO

 —   352 —   —   —   352 (c 352 (c 1992 07/09   (c

Supervalu:

            

Huntington, WV

 —   1,254 761 —   —   1,254 761   2,015 245   1971 02/97   40 years  

Maple Heights, OH

 —   1,035 2,874 —   —   1,035 2,874   3,909 925   1985 02/97   40 years  

Susser:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

 —   630 3,131 —   —   630 3,131   3,761 845   1983 03/99   40 years  

Swansea Quick Cash:

            

Swansea, IL

 —   46 132 —   —   46 132   178 27   1997 12/01   40 years  

Taco Bell:

            

Ocala, FL

 —   275 755 —   —   275 755   1,030 152   2001 12/01   40 years  

Ormond Beach, FL

 —   632 526 —   —   632 526   1,158 106   2001 12/01   40 years  

Phoenix, AZ

 —   594 283 —   —   594 283   877 57   1995 12/01   40 years  

Evansville, IN

 —   221 828 —   —   221 828   1,049 75   2003 05/06   40 years  

Indianapolis, IN

 —   547 703 —   —   547 703   1,250 64   2004 05/06   40 years  

Vincennes, IN

 —   502 880 —   —   502 880   1,382 80   2004 05/06   40 years  

Fishers, IN

 —   990 486 —   —   990 486   1,476 44   1998 05/06   40 years  

Evansville, IN

 —   308 1,301 —   —   308 1,301   1,609 118   2000 05/06   40 years  

Greensburg, IN

 —   648 1,079 —   —   648 1,079   1,727 98   1998 05/06   40 years  

Bedford, IN

 —   797 937 —   —   797 937   1,734 85   1989 05/06   40 years  

Speedway, IN

 —   408 1,426 —   —   408 1,426   1,834 129   2003 05/06   40 years  

Madisonville, KY

 —   682 1,193 —   —   682 1,193   1,875 108   1999 05/06   40 years  

Columbus, IN

 —   690 1,213 —   —   690 1,213   1,903 110   2005 05/06   40 years  

Ownesboro, KY

 —   639 1,326 —   —   639 1,326   1,965 120   2005 05/06   40 years  

Evansville, IN

 —   524 1,815 —   —   524 1,815   2,339 164   2005 05/06   40 years  

Shelbyville, IN

 —   670 1,756 —   —   670 1,756   2,426 159   1998 05/06   40 years  

Indianapolis, IN

 —   1,032 1,650 —   —   1,032 1,650   2,682 150   2004 05/06   40 years  

Terre Haute, IN

 —   1,037 1,656 —   —   1,037 1,656   2,693 150   2003 05/06   40 years  

Columbus, IN

 —   1,257 2,055 —   —   1,257 2,055   3,312 186   1990 05/06   40 years  

Terre Haute, IN

 —   1,314 2,249 —   —   1,314 2,249   3,563 204   2003 05/06   40 years  

Taverna Greek Grill:

            

Farmington, NM

 —   2,757 730 —   —   2,757 730   3,487 30   2003 12/07 (m)  40 years  

Texas Roadhouse:

            

Grand Junction, CO

 —   584 920 —   —   584 920   1,504 185   1997 12/01   40 years  

Thornton, CO

 —   599 1,019 —   —   599 1,019   1,618 205   1998 12/01   40 years  

TGI Friday’s:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

 —   1,210 1,532 —   —   1,210 1,532   2,742 308   1995 12/01   40 years  

Third Federal Savings:

            

Parma, OH

 —   370 238 1,100 —   370 1,338   1,708 58   1977 09/06   20 years  

Thomasville:

            

Buford, GA

 —   1,267 2,406 —   —   1,267 2,406   3,673 328   2004 07/04   40 years  

Three Monkeys:

            

Columbus, OH

 —   1,032 1,107 —   —   1,032 1,107   2,139 223   1998 12/01   40 years  

TitleMax:

            

Aiken, SC

 —   442 646 —   —   442 646   1,088 30   1989 08/08   30 years  

Riverdale, GA

 —   877 400 —   —   877 400   1,277 22   1978 08/08   25 years  

Hueytown, AL

 —   135 93 —   —   135 93   228 13   1948 08/08   10 years  

Sylacauga, AL

 —   94 191 —   —   94 191   285 9   1986 08/08   30 years  

Fairfield, AL

 —   133 178 —   —   133 178   311 10   1974 08/08   25 years  

Darlington, SC

 —   47 267 —   —   47 267   314 15   1973 08/08   25 years  

Montgomery, AL

 —   96 233 —   —   96 233   329 13   1970 08/08   25 years  

Memphis, TN

 —   111 237 —   —   111 237   348 11   1981 08/08   30 years  

Springfield, MO

 —   125 230 —   —   125 230   355 13   1979 08/08   25 years  

Lewisburg, TN

 —   70 298 —   —   70 298   368 12   1998 08/08   35 years  

Macon, GA

 —   103 290 —   —   103 290   393 20   1967 08/08   20 years  

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 20


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
 Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Total    

Cheraw, SC

 —   88 330 —   —   88 330 418 18 1976 08/08 25 years

Pulaski, TN

 —   109 361 —   —   109 361 470 17 1986 08/08 30 years

Berkeley, MO

 —   237 282 —   —   237 282 519 19 1961 08/08 20 years

Dalton, GA

 —   178 347 —   —   178 347 525 19 1972 08/08 25 years

Columbia, SC

 —   212 319 —   —   212 319 531 15 1987 08/08 30 years

St. Louis, MO

 —   134 398 —   —   134 398 532 16 1993 08/08 35 years

St. Louis, MO

 —   244 288 —   —   244 288 532 16 1971 08/08 25 years

Nashville, TN

 —   268 276 —   —   268 276 544 15 1978 08/08 25 years

Nashville, TN

 —   256 301 —   —   256 301 557 14 1982 08/08 30 years

Marietta, GA

 —   285 278 —   —   285 278 563 19 1967 08/08 20 years

Anniston, AL

 —   160 453 —   —   160 453 613 16 2008 08/08 40 years

Springfield, MO

 —   220 400 —   —   220 400 620 22 1979 08/08 25 years

Gadsden, AL

 —   250 389 —   —   250 389 639 13 2007 08/08 40 years

Memphis, TN

 —   226 444 —   —   226 444 670 20 1986 08/08 30 years

Taylors, SC

 —   299 372 —   —   299 372 671 15 1999 08/08 35 years

Lawrenceville, GA

 —   370 332 —   —   370 332 702 15 1986 08/08 30 years

Norcross, GA

 —   599 350 —   —   599 350 949 19 1975 08/08 25 years

Snellville, GA

 —   565 396 —   —   565 396 961 22 1977 08/08 25 years

Jonesboro, GA

 —   675 292 —   —   675 292 967 16 1970 08/08 25 years

Top’s:

            

Lacey, WA

 —   2,777 7,082 —   —   2,777 7,082 9,859 2,280 1992 02/97 40 years

Tractor Supply Co.:

            

Aransas Pass, TX

 —   101 1,399 200 —   100 1,599 1,699 388 1983 03/99 40 years

Tully’s:

            

Cheektowaga, NY

 —   689 386 —   —   689 386 1,075 78 1994 12/01 40 years

Ultra Car Wash:

            

Mobile, AL

 —   1,071 1,086 —   —   1,071 1,086 2,157 64 2005 08/07 40 years

Lilburn, GA

 —   1,396 1,119 —   —   1,396 1,119 2,515 45 2004 05/08 40 years

Uni-Mart:

            

Williamsport, PA

 —   909 122 —   —   909 122 1,031 27 1950 08/05 20 years

Hazleton, PA

 —   670 377 —   —   670 377 1,047 83 1974 08/05 20 years

Chambersburg, PA

 —   76 197 —   —   76 197 273 43 1990 08/05 20 years

Wilkes-Barre, PA

 —   876 1,957 —   —   876 1,957 2,833 428 1998 08/05 20 years

Bear Creek, PA

 —   191 230 —   —   191 230 421 50 1980 08/05 20 years

Shippensburg, PA

 —   204 330 —   —   204 330 534 72 1989 08/05 20 years

Larksville, PA

 —   246 334 —   —   246 334 580 73 1990 08/05 20 years

Wilkes-Barre, PA

 —   171 422 —   —   171 422 593 92 1999 08/05 20 years

Ridgway, PA

 —   382 259 —   —   382 259 641 57 1975 08/05 20 years

Wilkes-Barre, PA

 —   178 471 —   —   178 471 649 103 1989 08/05 20 years

St Clair, PA

 —   212 475 —   —   212 475 687 104 1984 08/05 20 years

Taylor, PA

 —   181 527 —   —   181 527 708 115 1973 08/05 20 years

Bloomsburg, PA

 —   206 501 —   —   206 501 707 110 1981 08/05 20 years

Avis, PA

 —   392 326 —   —   392 326 718 71 1976 08/05 20 years

Punxsutawney, PA

 —   253 542 —   —   253 542 795 119 1983 08/05 20 years

Coraopolis, PA (n)

 —   476 347 —   —   476 347 823 76 1983 08/05 20 years

Shamokin, PA

 —   324 506 —   —   324 506 830 111 1956 08/05 20 years

East Brady, PA

 —   269 583 —   —   269 583 852 128 1987 08/05 20 years

Pleasant Gap, PA

 —   332 593 —   —   332 593 925 130 1996 08/05 20 years

Port Vue, PA

 —   824 118 —   —   824 118 942 26 1953 08/05 20 years

Bradford, PA

 —   184 762 —   —   184 762 946 167 1983 08/05 20 years

Mountaintop, PA

 —   423 616 —   —   423 616 1,039 132 1987 09/05 20 years

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 21


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
 Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Ashland, PA

 —   355 545 —   —   355 545   900 117   1977   09/05 20 years  

Bear Creek, PA (n)

 —   689 275 —   —   689 275   964 59   1980   09/05 20 years  

Midway, PA

 —   311 708 —   —   311 708   1,019 93   1990   01/06 30 years  

Beech Creek, PA

 —   477 613 —   —   477 613   1,090 61   1988   01/06 40 years  

Newstead, NY

 —   255 835 —   —   255 835   1,090 83   1990   01/06 40 years  

New Florence, PA

 —   298 812 —   —   298 812   1,110 80   1989   01/06 40 years  

Mercersburg, PA

 —   672 746 —   —   672 746   1,418 74   1988   01/06 40 years  

Pittsburgh, PA

 —   905 1,346 —   —   905 1,346   2,251 133   1967   01/06 40 years  

Nuangola, PA

 —   1,062 1,203 —   —   1,062 1,203   2,265 119   2000   01/06 40 years  

Effort, PA

 —   1,297 1,202 —   —   1,297 1,202   2,499 119   2000   01/06 40 years  

Export, PA

 —   222 215 —   —   222 215   437 21   1988   01/06 40 years  

Reynoldsville, PA

 —   113 328 —   —   113 328   441 32   1983   01/06 40 years  

McSherrystown, PA

 —   135 365 —   —   135 365   500 36   1988   01/06 40 years  

Milesburg, PA

 —   134 373 —   —   134 373   507 37   1987   01/06 40 years  

Howard, PA

 —   136 375 —   —   136 375   511 37   1987   01/06 40 years  

Plains, PA

 —   204 401 —   —   204 401   605 40   1994   01/06 40 years  

Plainfield, PA

 —   244 383 —   —   244 383   627 38   1988   01/06 40 years  

Canisteo, NY

 —   142 485 —   —   142 485   627 48   1983   01/06 40 years  

Hastings, PA

 —   199 455 —   —   199 455   654 45   1989   01/06 40 years  

Nanticoke, PA

 —   175 482 —   —   175 482   657 48   1988   01/06 40 years  

Williamsport, PA

 —   295 379 —   —   295 379   674 37   1988   01/06 40 years  

Philipsburg, PA

 —   428 269 —   —   428 269   697 27   1978   01/06 40 years  

Ellwood City, PA

 —   196 526 —   —   196 526   722 52   1987   01/06 40 years  

Curwensville, PA

 —   226 608 —   —   226 608   834 60   1983   01/06 40 years  

Hughesville, PA

 —   290 566 —   —   290 566   856 56   1977   01/06 40 years  

Jersey Shore, PA

 —   515 381 —   —   515 381   896 38   1960   01/06 40 years  

Clairton, PA

 —   215 701 —   —   215 701   916 111   1986   01/06 25 years  

Leeper, PA

 —   286 644 —   —   286 644   930 64   1987   01/06 40 years  

Punxsutawney, PA

 —   294 650 —   —   294 650   944 64   1983   01/06 40 years  

Lewisberry, PA

 —   412 534 —   —   412 534   946 53   1988   01/06 40 years  

Burnham, PA

 —   265 510 —   —   340 435   775 75   1978   07/06 20 years  

Port Royal, PA

 —   238 635 —   —   238 635   873 110   1989   07/06 20 years  

United Rentals:

            

Carrollton, TX

 —   478 535 —   —   478 535   1,013 67   1981   12/04 40 years  

Cedar Park, TX

 —   535 829 —   —   535 829   1,364 105   1990   12/04 40 years  

Irving, TX

 —   708 911 —   —   708 911   1,619 115   1984   12/04 40 years  

Perrysburg, OH

 —   642 1,119 —   —   642 1,119   1,761 141   1979   12/04 40 years  

Oklahoma City, OK

 —   744 1,265 —   —   744 1,265   2,009 159   1997   12/04 40 years  

Plano, TX

 —   1,030 1,148 —   —   1,030 1,148   2,178 145   1996   12/04 40 years  

Temple, TX

 —   1,160 1,360 —   —   1,160 1,360   2,520 171   1998   12/04 40 years  

Clearwater, FL

 —   1,173 1,811 —   —   1,173 1,811   2,984 228   2001   12/04 40 years  

Fort Collins, CO

 —   2,057 978 —   —   2,057 978   3,035 123   1975   12/04 40 years  

La Porte, TX

 —   1,115 2,125 —   —   1,115 2,125   3,240 268   2000   12/04 40 years  

Littleton, CO

 —   1,743 1,944 —   —   1,743 1,944   3,687 245   2002   12/04 40 years  

Ft. Worth, TX

 —   1,428 —   —   —   1,428 —     1,428 (i (i 01/05 (i

Ft. Worth, TX

 —   510 1,128 —   —   510 1,128   1,638 140   1997   01/05 40 years  

Melbourne, FL

 —   747 607 —   —   747 607   1,354 70   1970   05/05 40 years  

United Trust Bank:

            

Bridgeview, IL

 —   673 744 —   —   673 744   1,417 150   1997   12/01 40 years  

Vacant Land:

            

Florence, AL

 —   1,034 —   —   —   748 (e 748 (e (e 06/04 (e

Longwood, FL

 —   585 —   —   —   585 (e 585 (e (e 03/06 (e

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 22


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

Vacant Property:

            

Foothill Ranch, CA

 —     1,456 2,505 —   —   1,456 2,505   3,961 814   1995   12/96   40 years  

Sarasota, FL

 —     1,168 1,904 219 —   1,168 2,122   3,290 319   1996   09/97   40 years  

Knoxville, TN

 —     467 735 —   —   467 735   1,202 201   1999   01/98 (f)  40 years  

Mason, OH

 —     594 885 —   —   594 885   1,479 233   1999   06/98 (f)  40 years  

Everett, PA

 —     226 1,160 8 —   226 657   883 190   1998   11/98   37 years  

Aransas Pass, TX

 —     90 1,241 —   —   89 1,241   1,330 335   1983   03/99   40 years  

Sealy, TX

 —     820 905 —   —   820 905   1,725 244   1982   03/99   40 years  

Sarasota, FL

 —     471 1,344 —   —   471 1,344   1,815 209   1983   03/99   40 years  

Winfield, AL

 —     420 1,685 —   —   420 1,685   2,105 454   1983   03/99   40 years  

Southfield, MI

 —     405 644 —   —   405 644   1,049 149   1976   12/01   40 years  

Swansea, IL

 —     92 265 —   —   92 265   357 53   1997   12/01   40 years  

Eden Prairie, MN

 —     76 211 94 —   76 305   381 58   1997   12/01   40 years  

Mesa, AZ

 —     153 400 113 —   153 513   666 81   1997   12/01   40 years  

Wichita Falls, TX

 —     819 1,107 —   —   696 —     696 220   1982   12/01   40 years  

Jacksonville, FL

 —     987 856 —   —   794 —     794 170   1996   12/01   40 years  

Florissant, MO

 —     2,490 2,937 —   —   2,490 2,937   5,427 493   1996   04/03   40 years  

Woodstock, GA

 —     1,937 1,285 —   —   1,891 1,016   2,907 210   1997   05/03   40 years  

Orlando, FL

 52 (o)  40 111 —   —   40 111   151 16   2001   02/04   40 years  

Cohoes, NY

 —     27 145 1 —   27 146   173 19   1994   09/04   40 years  

Cohoes, NY

 —     48 275 3 —   48 278   326 37   1994   09/04   40 years  

Ticonderoga, NY

 —     89 689 —   —   89 689   778 91   1993   09/04   40 years  

Gastonia, NC

 —     2,548 3,880 —   —   2,548 3,880   6,428 489   2004   12/04   40 years  

Olean, NY

 —     40 259 —   —   40 259   299 57   1990   08/05   20 years  

Lapeer, MI

 —     100 721 —   —   100 721   821 43   2007   10/05   40 years  

Lafayette, LA

 —     603 1,149 —   —   603 1,149   1,752 116   1999   12/05   40 years  

Hollywood, FL

 —     417 184 —   —   417 103   520 1   1961   12/05   10 years  

Warriors Mark, PA

 —     148 405 —   —   148 405   553 40   1995   01/06   40 years  

Ridgeland, MS

 —     779 933 —   —   779 933   1,712 94   1997   08/06   40 years  

Montgomery, AL

 —     593 1,187 —   —   593 1,187   1,780 120   1998   08/06   40 years  

Houston, TX

 —     422 1,915 —   —   422 1,915   2,337 193   1995   08/06   40 years  

Houston, TX

 —     112 509 —   —   112 509   621 52   1995   08/06   40 years  

Tulsa, OK

 —     325 314 —   —   325 314   639 52   1978   09/06   20 years  

Hillman, MI

 —     167 823 —   —   167 363   530 64   1952   10/06   40 years  

Tucson, AZ

 —     996 2,742 —   —   996 2,742   3,738 157   2007   12/06 (m)  40 years  

Aurora, CO

 —     5,076 13,874 38 —   5,076 13,912   18,988 940   1986   04/07   40 years  

Independence, MO

 —     1,838 1,534 —   —   1,838 1,534   3,372 101   1988   05/07   40 years  

Wichita, KS

 —     1,551 965 —   —   1,551 965   2,516 63   1987   05/07   40 years  

Wichita, KS

 —     3,275 1,631 —   —   3,275 1,631   4,906 107   1988   05/07   40 years  

Columbus, OH

 —     2,076 1,906 —   —   2,076 1,906   3,982 121   1990   06/07   40 years  

Columbus, OH

 —     5,380 2,693 —   —   5,380 2,693   8,073 171   1990   06/07   40 years  

Bellingham, WA

 —     1,237 1,260 —   —   1,237 408   1,645 61   1994   06/08   30 years  

Plano, TX

 —     5,705 17,049 —   —   5,705 17,049   22,754 710   1982   07/08   35 years  

Value City Furniture:

            

White Marsh, MD

 —     3,762 —   3,006 —   3,762 3,006   6,768 886   1998   10/97 (g)  40 years  

Walgreens:

            

Sunrise, FL

 —     1,958 1,401 —   —   1,958 1,401   3,359 232   1994   05/03   40 years  

Tulsa, OK

 —     1,193 3,056 —   —   1,193 3,056   4,249 347   2003   06/05   40 years  

Washington Bike Center:

            

Fairfax, VA

 —     193 279 84 —   193 363   556 76   1995   12/95   40 years  

Wendy’s:

            

Sacramento, CA

 —     586 —   —   —   586 (i 586 (i (i 02/98   (i

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 23


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
 Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
 Date of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land  Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land  Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total    

New Kensington,

PA

 —   501   333 —   —   501   333   834 67 1980   12/01   40 years  

Whataburger:

            

Albuquerque, NM

 —   624   419 —   —   624   419   1,043 84 1995   12/01   40 years  

Brunswick, GA

 —   291    910 —   291   910   1,201 62 2007   12/06 (m)  40 years  

Starke, FL

 —   476   982 —   —   476   982   1,458 73 2006   01/07   40 years  

Jacksonville, FL

 —   824   934 —   —   824   934   1,758 69 2006   01/07   40 years  

Yulee, FL

 —   894   1,014 —   —   894   1,014   1,908 75 2006   01/07   40 years  

Wherehouse Music:

            

Homewood, AL

 —   1,032   697 —   —   1,032   697   1,729 140 1997   12/01   40 years  

Independence, MO

 —   503   1,209 —   —   503   1,209   1,712 122 1994   12/05   40 years  

Wingfoot:

            

Dandrige, TN

 —   (l 1,030 —   —   (l 1,030   1,030 77 1989   05/07   35 years  

Brunswick, GA

 —   (l 1,450 —   —   (l 1,450   1,450 95 2003   05/07   40 years  

Valdosta, GA

 —   (l 1,477 —   —   (l 1,477   1,477 97 2004   05/07   40 years  

Gary, IN

 —   (l 1,486 —   —   (l 1,486   1,486 98 2004   05/07   40 years  

Beaverdam, OH

 —   (l 1,521 —   —   (l 1,521   1,521 100 2004   05/07   40 years  

Dalton, GA

 —   (l 1,541 —   —   (l 1,541   1,541 101 2004   05/07   40 years  

Benton, AR

 —   (l 309 —   —   (l 309   309 19 2001   05/07   40 years  

Port Wentworth,

GA

 —   (l 552 —   —   (l 552   552 41 1998   05/07   35 years  

Mebane, NC

 —   (l 561 —   —   (l 561   561 42 1998   05/07   35 years  

Franklin, OH

 —   (l 563 —   —   (l 563   563 42 1998   05/07   35 years  

Piedmont, SC

 —   (l 567 —   —   (l 567   567 42 1999   05/07   35 years  

Georgetown, KY

 —   (l 679 —   —   (l 679   679 59 1997   05/07   30 years  

Bowman, SC

 —   (l 969 —   —   (l 969   969 73 1998   05/07   35 years  

Temple, GA

 —   (l 1,065 —   —   (l 1,065   1,065 57 2007   06/07   40 years  

Whiteland, IN

 —   (l 1,471 —   —   (l 1,471   1,471 90 2004   07/07   40 years  

Evansville, IN

 —   (l 576 —   —   (l 576   576 35 2002   07/07   40 years  

Des Moines, IA

 —   (l 816 —   —   (l 816   816 50 1987   07/07   40 years  

Robinson, TX

 —   (l 1,183 —   —   (l 1,183   1,183 63 2007   07/07   40 years  

Kearney, MO

 —   (l 1,269 —   —   (l 1,269   1,269 78 2003   07/07   40 years  

Oklahoma City, OK

 —   (l 1,247 —   —   (l 1,247   1,247 58 2008   08/07   40 years  

Amarillo, TX

 —   (l 1,158 —   —   (l 1,158   1,158 45 2008   02/08   40 years  

Jackson, MS

 —   (l 1,281 —   —   (l 1,281   1,281 47 2008   03/08   40 years  

Glendale, KY

 —   (l 1,066 —   —   (l 1,066   1,066 32 2008   07/08   40 years  

Lebanon, TN

 —   (l 1,331 —   —   (l 1,331   1,331 35 2008   08/08   40 years  

Laredo, TX

 —   (l 1,238 —   —   (l 1,238   1,238 25 2009   11/08   40 years  

Winn-Dixie:

            

Columbus, GA

 —   1,023   1,875 —   —   1,023   1,875   2,898 303 1984   07/03   40 years  

Your Choice:

            

Montoursville, PA

 —   158   415 13 —   158   428   586 41 1988   01/06   40 years  

Ziebart:

            

Middleburg Heights,

OH

 —   199   148 —   —   199   148   347 18 1961   02/05   40 years  

Maplewood, MN

 —   308   311 —   —   308   311   619 38 1990   02/05   40 years  

Zio’s Italian Kitchen:

            

Aurora, CO

 —   1,168   1,105 —   —   1,168   1,105   2,273 153 2000   06/05   30 years  

Leasehold Interests:

            

Lima, OH

 —   1,290   —   —   —   1,290   (e 1,290 943 (e 08/01   (e
                        

SUBTOTAL

 24,430 1,061,112   1,340,082 134,270 —   1,056,186   1,450,349   2,506,535 183,956   
                        

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 24


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
  Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
 Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land  Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land  Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total     

Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Direct Financing Leases:

           

Barnes & Noble:

            

Plantation, FL

 —   —     3,498 —   —   —     (c (c (c 1996 05/95 (f)  (c

Borders:

            

Altamonte Springs,

FL

 —   —     3,267 —   —   —     (c (c (c 1997 09/97   (c

Checkers:

            

Orlando, FL

 —   —     287 —   —   —     (c (c (c 1988 07/92   (c

CVS:

            

San
Antonio,

TX

 —   —     784 —   —   —     (c (c (c 1993 12/93   (c

Amarillo, TX

 —   159   855 —   —   (d (d (d (d 1994 12/94   (d

Lafayette, LA

 —   —     949 —   —   —     (c (c (c 1995 01/96   (c

Oklahoma City, OK

 —   (l 1,365 —   —   (l (c (c (c 1997 06/97   (c

Oklahoma City, OK

 —   (l 1,419 —   —   (l (c (c (c 1997 06/97   (c

Denny’s:

            

Stockton, CA

 —   940   509 —   —   (d (d (d (d 1982 09/06   (d

Food 4 Less:

            

Chula Vista, CA

 —   —     4,266 —   —   —     (c (c (c 1995 11/98   (c

Heilig-Meyers/The Room Store:

            

York, PA

 —   279   1,110 —   —   (d (d (d (d 1997 11/98   (d

Marlow Heights,

MD

 —   416   1,397 —   —   (d (d (d (d 1968 11/98   (d

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 25


Table of Contents
  Encumbrances  Initial Cost to
Company
 Costs Capitalized
Subsequent to
Acquisition
 Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
  Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization
  Date of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Life on Which
Depreciation &
Amortization in
Latest Income
Statement is
Computed
 
  Land  Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
 Improvements Carrying
Costs
 Land  Building,
Improvements &
Leasehold
Interests
  Total     

Jared Jewelers:

            

Phoenix, AZ

 267 (k)  (l 1,242 —   —   (l (c (c (c 1998   12/01   (c

Toledo, OH

 —     (l 1,458 —   —   (l (c (c (c 1998   12/01   (c

Oviedo, FL

 392 (k)  (l 1,500 —   —   (l (c (c (c 1998   12/01   (c

Lewisville, TX

 201 (k)  (l 1,503 —   —   (l (c (c (c 1998   12/01   (c

Glendale, AZ

 —     (l 1,599 —   —   (l (c (c (c 1998   12/01   (c

Kash n’ Karry:

            

Valrico, FL

 —     1,235   3,255 —   —   (d (d (d (d 1997   06/02   (d

Rite Aid:

            

Kennett Square,

PA

 —     (l —   1,984 —   (l (c (c (c 2000   12/00   (c

Arlington, VA

 —     (l 3,201 —   —   (l (c (c (c 2000   02/02   (c

Sunshine Energy:

            

Altamont, KS

 —     124   142 —   —   (d (d (d (d 1979   07/09   (d

Chouteau, OK

 —     113   301 —   —   (d (d (d (d 1988   07/09   (d

Neosho, MO

 —     —     775 —   —   —     (c (c (c 1992   07/09   (c
                           

SUBTOTAL

 860   3,266   34,682 1,984 —   —     —     —     —       
                           

Real Estate Held for Sale the Company has Invested in:

    

           

Our Place:

            

North Richland

Hills, TX

 —     584   180 185 —   596   352   948   —     1989   02/06   —    

Power Center:

            

Midland, MI

 —     1,085   1,635 —   —   1,085   1,635   2,720   —     2006   05/05 (g)  —    

Big Flats, NY

 —     2,248   7,159 —   —   2,248   5,291   7,539   —     2006   08/05 (g)  —    

Topsham, ME

 —     1,885   1,735 —   —   1,885   62   1,947   —     2007   02/06 (g)  —    

Irving, TX

 —     951   1,090 —   —   951   1,090   2,041   —     1987   02/06   —    

Waxahachie, TX

 —     1,249   1,097 —   —   1,249   1,097   2,346   —     1995   02/06   —    

Rockwall, TX

 —     8,959   28,717 —   —   8,959   26,717   35,676   —     2007   02/06 (g)  —    

Harlingen, TX

 —     247   807 —   —   247   807   1,054   —     2008   09/06 (g)  —    

Harlingen, TX

 —     749   1,238 —   —   749   1,238   1,987   —     2008   09/06 (g)  —    

Woodstock, GA

 —     261   701 —   —   261   606   867   —     1997   07/08   —    

Starbucks:

            

Harlingen, TX

 —     286   369 —   —   286   369   655   —     2008   09/06   —    

Tutor Time:

            

Elk Grove, CA

 —     1,216   2,786 —   —   1,216   2,786   4,002   —     2009   09/08   —    

Vacant Land:

            

Grand
Prairie,

TX

 —     387   —   —   —   108   (e 108   (e (e 12/02   —    

Topsham, ME

 —     1,034   —   —   —   293   (e 293   (e (e 02/06   —    

Rockwall, TX

 —     9,153   —   —   —   4,950   (e 4,950   (e (e 02/06   —    

Fairfield Township,

OH

 —     3,201   —   —   —   1,719   (e 1,719   (e (e 08/06   —    

Bonita Springs,

FL

 —     112   —   —   —   25   (e 25   (e (e 09/06   —    

Lancaster, OH

 —     2,135   —   —   —   1,339   (e 1,339   (e (e 01/08   —    

Hadley, MA

 —     2,570   —   —   —   2,570   (e 2,570   (e (e 02/08   —    
                           

SUBTOTAL

 —     38,312   47,514 185 —   30,736   42,050   72,786   —       
                           

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 26


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

December 31, 2009

(dollars in thousands)

 

(a)Transactions in real estate and accumulated depreciation during 2009, 2008, and 2007 are summarized as follows:

 

   2009  2008  2007 

Land, buildings, and leasehold interests:

    

Balance at the beginning of year

  $2,605,296   $2,415,544   $1,756,514  

Acquisitions, completed construction and tenant improvements

   37,175    410,787    864,116  

Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests

   (21,751  (215,542  (203,403

Provision for loss on impairment of real estate

   (34,514  (5,493  (1,683
             

Balance at the close of year

  $2,586,206   $2,605,296   $2,415,544  
             

Accumulated depreciation and amortization:

    

Balance at the beginning of year

  $146,296   $111,087   $87,359  

Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests

   (3,143  (2,591  (3,667

Depreciation and amortization expense

   40,803    37,800    27,395  
             

Balance at the close of year

  $183,956   $146,296   $111,087  
             

As of December 31, 2009, the detailed real estate schedule excludes equipment and work in progress of $1,259 and $5,634, respectively, which is included in the above reconciliation.

 

(b)As of December 31, 2009, the leases are treated as either operating or financing leases for federal income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2009, the aggregate cost of the properties owned by NNN that are under operating leases were $2,450,070 and financing leases were $5,894.
(c)For financial reporting purposes, the portion of the lease relating to the building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.
(d)For financial reporting purposes, the lease for the land and building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.
(e)NNN owns only the land for this property.
(f)Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN purchased the buildings from the tenants upon completion of construction, generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.
(g)Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. NNN developed the buildings, generally completing construction within 12 months from the acquisition date of the land.
(h)In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of NNN’s tenants, in June of 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties.
(i)NNN owns only the land for this property, which is subject to a ground lease between NNN and the tenant. The tenant funded the improvements on the property.
(j)In 2005, there was a lease amendment to this property, resulting in a reclassification from a direct financing lease to an operating lease.
(k)NNN owns only the building for this property, which is encumbered by a fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.
(l)NNN owns only the building for this property. The land is subject to a ground lease between NNN and an unrelated third party.
(m)Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN funds the tenant’s construction draws, final funding occurs generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.
(n)The tenant of this property has subleased the property. The tenant continues to be responsible for complying with all the terms of the lease agreement and is continuing to pay rent on this property to NNN.
(o)Property is encumbered as a part of NNN’s $6,952 long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.
(p)Property is encumbered as a part of NNN’s $21,000 long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.

 

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

F - 27


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE

December 31, 2009

(dollars in thousands)

 

Description

  Interest
Rate
  Maturity
Date
  Periodic
Payment
Terms
  Prior
Liens
  Face Amount
of Mortgages
  Carrying
Amount of
Mortgages (e)
  Principal Amount
of Loans Subject

to Delinquent
Principal or
Interest

First mortgages on properties:

           

Paramus, NJ

  9.000 2022  (b —     6,000  $5,218    —  

Des Moines, IA

  8.000 2010  (d —     400   320    —  

Terre Haute, IN

  7.000 2011  (c —     1,582   1,452    —  

Houston, TX

  9.932 2010  (c —     3,998   3,998    —  

Lubbock, TX

  10.000 2010  (c —     14,000   9,025    —  

Cleveland, OH

  10.000 2028  (c —     6,644   6,644    —  

Keystone Heights, FL

  9.000 2010  (c —     1,650   1,650    —  

Chattanooga, TN

  9.000 2010  (c —     1,600   1,600    —  

Lynchburg, VA

  9.000 2010  (c —     1,600   1,600    —  

Martinsburg, WV

  9.000 2010  (c —     1,650   1,650    —  

Milford, CT

  7.000 2013  (c —     1,550   1,550    —  
                  
        $40,674  $34,707 (a)  $—  
                  

 

(a)The following shows the changes in the carrying amounts of mortgage loans during the years:

 

   2009  2008  2007 

Balance at beginning of year

  $35,993   $49,336   $13,627  

New mortgage loans

   2,259 (f)   17,028 (f)   39,088 (f) 

Deductions during the year:

    

Collections of principal

   (3,545  (27,874  (3,379

Foreclosures

   —      (2,497  —    
             

Balance at the close of year

  $34,707   $35,993   $49,336  
             

 

(b)Principal and interest is payable at level amounts over the life of the loan.

 

(c)Interest only payments are due monthly. Principal is due at maturity.

 

(d)Principal and interest is payable at level amounts over the life of the loan with a principal balloon payment at maturity.

 

(e)Mortgages held by NNN and its subsidiaries for federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $34,707, $35,993, and $49,336, respectively.

 

(f)Mortgages totaling $2,259, $17,028, and $39,088, were accepted in connection with real estate transactions for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.