NNN REIT
NNN
#2347
Rank
$7.91 B
Marketcap
$41.67
Share price
1.09%
Change (1 day)
9.51%
Change (1 year)

NNN REIT - 10-K annual report 2010


Text size:
Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from                      to                      .

Commission file number 001-11290

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Maryland

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

56-1431377

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

450 South Orange Avenue, Suite 900

Orlando, Florida 32801

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (407) 265-7348

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class:

Common Stock, $0.01 par value

7.375% Series C Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value

 

Name of exchange on which registered:

New York Stock Exchange

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

None

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act    Yes  ¨     No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes  x     No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  x  Accelerated filer  ¨  Non-accelerated filer  ¨  Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

The aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2010 was $1,766,742,768.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 15, 2011 was 83,759,282.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

Registrant incorporates by reference into Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K portions of National Retail Properties, Inc.’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Regulation 14A. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

     PAGE      
REFERENCE
 
Part I   

Item 1.

 

Business

   1  

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

   8  

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

   18  

Item 2.

 

Properties

   18  

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

   18  

Item 4.

 

[Removed and Reserved]

   18  
Part II   

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

   19  

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

   21  

Item 7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

   23  

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

   43  

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

   44  

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

   82  

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

   82  

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

   84  
Part III   

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

   85  

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

   85  

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

   85  

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

   85  

Item 14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

   85  
Part IV   

Item 15.

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

   86  

Signatures

   92  


Table of Contents

PART I

Unless the context otherwise requires, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the terms “registrant” or “NNN” or the “Company” refer to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

Statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K, including the documents that are incorporated by reference, that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Also, when NNN uses any of the words “anticipate,” “assume,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” or similar expressions, NNN is making forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon present expectations and reasonable assumptions, NNN’s actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those NNN anticipates or projects are described in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any document incorporated herein by reference. NNN undertakes no obligation to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 1.  Business

The Company

NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable, and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”).

Real Estate Assets

NNN acquires, owns, invests in and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 1,195 Investment Properties (including 11 properties with retail operations that NNN operates), with an aggregate leasable area of 12,972,000 square feet, located in 46 states. Approximately 97 percent of total properties in NNN’s Investment Portfolio were leased or operated as of December 31, 2010.

The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 17 Inventory Properties.

Competition

NNN generally competes with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors, including but not limited to, insurance companies, pension funds and financial institutions, that own, manage, finance or develop retail and net leased properties.

 

1


Table of Contents

Employees

As of January 31, 2011, NNN employed 58 full-time associates including executive and administrative personnel.

Other Information

NNN’s executive offices are located at 450 S. Orange Avenue, Suite 900, Orlando, Florida 32801, and its telephone number is (407) 265-7348. NNN has an Internet website at www.nnnreit.com where NNN’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) can be downloaded free of charge.

The common shares of National Retail Properties, Inc. are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “NNN.” The depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series C Preferred Stock”), of NNN are traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “NNNPRC.”

Business Strategies and Policies

The following is a discussion of NNN’s operating strategy and certain of its investment, financing and other policies. These strategies and policies have been set by management and/or the Board of Directors and, in general, may be amended or revised from time to time by management and/or the Board of Directors without a vote of NNN’s stockholders.

Operating Strategies

NNN’s strategy is to invest primarily in retail real estate that is typically well located for its tenants’ lines of trade within each local market. Management believes that these types of properties, generally pursuant to triple-net leases, provide attractive opportunities for a stable current return and the potential for increased returns and capital appreciation. Triple-net leases typically require the tenant to pay property operating expenses such as real estate taxes, assessments and other government charges, insurance, utilities, repairs and maintenance and capital expenditures. Initial lease terms are generally 15 to 20 years.

In some cases, NNN’s investment in real estate is in the form of mortgages, structured finance investments or other loans which may be secured by real estate, a borrower’s pledge of ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets. These investments may be subordinated to senior loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans.

NNN holds investment real estate assets until it determines that the sale of such a property is advantageous in view of NNN’s investment objectives. In deciding whether to sell a real estate investment asset, NNN may consider factors such as potential capital appreciation, net cash flow, tenant credit quality, market lease rates, potential use of sale proceeds and federal income tax considerations.

NNN acquires and/or develops inventory real estate assets primarily for the purpose of resale.

NNN’s management team considers certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN may include items such as: the composition of NNN’s Investment Portfolio (including but not limited to tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of NNN’s Investment Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios, profitability measures, industry trends and performance of competitors compared to that of NNN.

The operating strategies employed by NNN have allowed it to increase the annual dividend (paid quarterly) per common share for 21 consecutive years.

 

2


Table of Contents

Investment in Real Estate or Interests in Real Estate

NNN’s management believes that single tenant, freestanding net lease retail properties will continue to be attractive investment opportunities and that NNN is well suited to take advantage of these opportunities because of its experience in accessing capital markets, ability to underwrite and acquire properties, and because of management’s experience in seeking out, identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions.

In evaluating a particular acquisition, management may consider a variety of factors, including:

 

  

the location, visibility and accessibility of the property,

 

  

the geographic area and demographic characteristics of the community, as well as the local real estate market, including potential for growth, market rents, and existing or potential competing properties or retailers,

 

  

the size of the property,

 

  

the purchase price,

 

  

the non-financial terms of the proposed acquisition,

 

  

the availability of funds or other consideration for the proposed acquisition and the cost thereof,

 

  

the compatibility of the property with NNN’s existing portfolio,

 

  

the potential for, and current extent of, any environmental problems,

 

  

the quality of construction and design and the current physical condition of the property,

 

  

the property level operating history,

 

  

the financial and other characteristics of the existing tenant,

 

  

the tenant’s business plan, operating history and management team,

 

  

the tenant’s industry,

 

  

the terms of any existing leases, and

 

  

the rent to be paid by the tenant.

NNN intends to engage in future investment activities in a manner that is consistent with the maintenance of its status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and that will not make NNN an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Equity investments in acquired properties may be subject to existing mortgage financings and other indebtedness or to new indebtedness which may be incurred in connection with acquiring or refinancing these investments.

Investments in Real Estate Mortgages, Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, and Securities of or Interests in Persons Engaged in Real Estate Activities

While NNN’s primary business objectives and Investment Properties emphasize retail properties, NNN may invest in (i) a wide variety of property and tenant types, (ii) leases, mortgages, commercial mortgage residual interests and other types of real estate interests, (iii) loans secured by personal property, (iv) loans secured by membership interests, or (v) securities of other REITs, other entities engaged in real estate activities or securities of other issuers, including for the purpose of exercising control over such entities. For example, NNN from time to time has made investments in mortgage loans or held mortgages on properties that NNN has sold and has made structured finance investments and other loans related to properties acquired or sold.

 

3


Table of Contents

Financing Strategy

NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategies while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to its stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.

NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional retail properties with cash from its $400,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). As of December 31, 2010, $161,000,000 was outstanding and $239,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $647,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN’s ratio of total liabilities to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation) was approximately 40 percent and the secured indebtedness to total gross assets was approximately two percent. The total debt to total market capitalization was approximately 34 percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances.

NNN anticipates it will be able to obtain additional financing for short-term and long-term liquidity requirements as further described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity.” However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.

The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy at any time. NNN has not engaged in trading, underwriting or agency distribution or sale of securities of other issuers and does not intend to do so.

Strategies and Policy Changes

Any of NNN’s strategies or policies described above may be changed at any time by NNN without notice to or a vote of NNN’s stockholders.

Investment Portfolio

As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 1,195 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 12,972,000 square feet, located in 46 states. Approximately 97 percent of total properties in the Investment Portfolio were leased or operated by NNN as of December 31, 2010.

The following table summarizes NNN’s Investment Properties as of December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 

   Size(1)   Acquisition Cost(2) 
  High   Low   Average   High   Low   Average 

Land

   2,223     5     101    $8,882    $5    $974  

Building

   135     1     11     19,917     44     1,435  

(1)     Approximate square feet.

(2)     Costs vary depending upon size and local demographic factors.

        

        

In connection with the development of 28 Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction, land costs and tenant improvements) of $68,746,000. As of December 31, 2010, NNN had funded $50,196,000 of these commitments, with $18,550,000 remaining to be funded.

 

4


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2010, NNN did not have any tenant that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental income.

Leases

Although there are variations in the specific terms of the leases, the following is a summary of the general structure of NNN’s leases. Generally, the leases of the Investment Properties provide for initial terms of 15 to 20 years. As of December 31, 2010, the weighted average remaining lease term was approximately 12 years. The Investment Properties are generally leased under net leases pursuant to which the tenant typically will bear responsibility for substantially all property costs and expenses associated with ongoing maintenance and operation, including utilities, property taxes and insurance. In addition, the majority of NNN’s leases provide that the tenant is responsible for roof and structural repairs. The leases of the Investment Properties provide for annual base rental payments (payable in monthly installments) ranging from $6,000 to $1,876,000 (average of $199,000). Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”), and/or, to a lesser extent, increases in the tenant’s sales volume.

Generally, the Investment Property leases provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions provided under the initial lease. Some of the leases also provide that in the event NNN wishes to sell the Investment Property subject to that lease, NNN first must offer the lessee the right to purchase the Investment Property on the same terms and conditions as any offer which NNN intends to accept for the sale of the Investment Property.

The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of NNN’s Investment Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of December 31, 2010:

 

     % of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
     # of
Properties
     Gross
Leasable
Area(2)
           % of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
     # of
Properties
     Gross
Leasable
Area(2)
 

2011        

     1.5%       18       260,000       2017       3.9%       28       682,000  

2012        

     3.1%       35       520,000       2018       2.6%       24       345,000  

2013        

     4.4%       40       839,000       2019       4.0%       41       618,000  

2014        

     4.4%       42       577,000       2020       4.0%       83       694,000  

2015        

     4.5%       72       1,011,000       Thereafter       65.4%       745       6,167,000  

2016        

     2.2%       19       407,000                  

(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2010.

(2)     Approximate square feet.

        

        

 

5


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the diversification of NNN’s Investment Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:

 

      % of Annual Base Rent(1) 
    

Top 10 Lines of Trade

  2010   2009   2008 

1.

  Convenience Stores   23.7%     26.7%     25.7%  

2.

  Restaurants – Full Service   10.1%     9.2%     8.7%  

3.

  Automotive Parts   7.8%     6.8%     5.1%  

4.

  Theaters   5.7%     6.3%     6.1%  

5.

  Automotive Service   5.3%     5.7%     8.9%  

6.

  Sporting Goods   4.5%     3.2%     3.3%  

7.

  Restaurants – Limited Service   4.1%     3.5%     3.3%  

8.

  Drug Stores   4.0%     4.1%     4.0%  

9.

  Books   3.8%     4.1%     4.0%  

10.

  Grocery   2.7%     2.9%     2.6%  
  Other   28.3%     27.5%     28.3%  
                 
     100.0%     100.0%     100.0%  
                 

(1)      Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.

          

The following table shows the top 10 states in which NNN’s Investment Properties are located as of December 31, 2010:

 

   

State

  # of
Properties
   % of
Annual
Base Rent(1)
 

1.

  Texas   220     18.7%  

2.

  Florida   93     10.0%  

3.

  Illinois   47     6.7%  

4.

  North Carolina   73     6.2%  

5.

  Georgia   60     5.0%  

6.

  Indiana   39     4.4%  

7.

  Ohio   38     4.1%  

8.

  Pennsylvania   84     3.9%  

9.

  Tennessee   33     2.9%  

10.

  Missouri   28     2.9%  
  Other   480     35.2%  
            
     1,195     100.0%  
            

(1)      Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2010.

 

          

Mortgages and Notes Receivable

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets and include structured finance investments which are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate. Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009 

Mortgages and notes receivable

  $29,750   $41,707  

Accrued interest receivables, net of reserves

   644    269  

Unamortized discount

   (63  -  
         
  $30,331   $41,976  
         

 

6


Table of Contents

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests

Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”), a wholly owned and consolidated subsidiary of NNN, holds the residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven commercial real estate loan securitizations. Each of the Residuals is reported at fair value based upon an independent valuation; unrealized gains or losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity, and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. The Residuals had an estimated fair value of $15,915,000 and $20,153,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

For more information regarding NNN’s Investment Portfolio, see Note 23 of NNN’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Inventory Portfolio

NNN’s Inventory Portfolio, which is owned by the TRS, is held with the intent to sell the properties to purchasers who are looking for replacement like-kind exchange property or to other purchasers with different investment objectives. As of December 31, 2010, the Inventory Portfolio consisted of 10 completed development projects and seven land parcels.

The following table summarizes the completed Inventory Portfolio as of December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 

   Size(1)   Acquisition Cost(2) 
   High   Low   Average   High   Low   Average 

Land

   527     17     106    $2,248    $108    $953  

Building

   42     4     12     7,159     341     1,849  

(1)     Approximate square feet.

(2)     Costs vary depending upon size and local demographic factors.

        

        

For more information regarding NNN’s Inventory Portfolio, see Note 23 of NNN’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Governmental Regulations Affecting Properties

Property Environmental Considerations.  Subject to a determination of the level of risk and potential cost of remediation, NNN may acquire a property where some level of contamination may exist. Investments in real property create a potential for substantial environmental liability on the part of the owner of such property from the presence or discharge of hazardous substances on the property or the improper disposal of hazardous substances emanating from the property, regardless of fault. As a part of its acquisition due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each property. In such cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the problem, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance to address environmental conditions at the property.

As of February 15, 2011, NNN has 59 Investment Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation. In general, the seller, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Investment Properties.

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.  The Investment and Inventory Properties, as commercial facilities, are required to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and similar state and local laws and regulations (collectively, the “ADA”). Investigation of a property may reveal non-compliance with the ADA. The tenants will typically have primary responsibility for complying with the ADA, but NNN may incur costs if the tenant does not comply. As of February 15, 2011, NNN has not

 

7


Table of Contents

been notified by any governmental authority of, nor is NNN’s management aware of, any non-compliance with the ADA that NNN’s management believes would have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position or results of operations.

Other Regulations.  State and local fire, life-safety and similar requirements regulate the use of NNN’s Investment and Inventory Properties. NNN’s leases generally require each tenant to undertake primary responsibility for complying with regulations, but failure to comply could result in fines by governmental authorities, awards of damages to private litigants, or restrictions on the ability to conduct business on such properties.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Carefully consider the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. If any of the events or developments described below were actually to occur, NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

Current financial and economic conditions may have an adverse impact on NNN, its tenants, and commercial real estate in general.

Current financial and economic conditions continue to be challenging and volatile and any worsening of such conditions, including any disruption in the capital markets, could adversely affect NNN’s business and results of operations and the financial condition of NNN’s tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or the institutions that hold NNN’s cash balances and short-term investments, which may expose NNN to increased risks of default by these parties.

There can be no assurance that actions of the United States Government, Federal Reserve or other government and regulatory bodies intended to stabilize the economy or financial markets will achieve their intended effect. Additionally, some of these actions may adversely affect financial institutions, capital providers, retailers, consumers or NNN’s financial condition, results of operations or the trading price of NNN’s shares.

Potential consequences of the current financial and economic conditions include:

 

  

the financial condition of NNN’s tenants operating in the retail industry may be adversely affected, which may result in tenant defaults under the leases due to bankruptcy, lack of liquidity, operational failures or for other reasons;

 

  

the ability to borrow on terms and conditions that NNN finds acceptable may be limited or unavailable, which could reduce NNN’s ability to pursue acquisition and development opportunities and refinance existing debt, reduce NNN’s returns from acquisition and development activities, reduce NNN’s ability to make cash distributions to its shareholders and increase NNN’s future interest expense;

 

  

reduced values of NNN’s properties which may limit NNN’s ability to dispose of assets at attractive prices and may reduce the availability of buyer financing;

 

  

the value and liquidity of NNN’s short-term investments and cash deposits could be reduced as a result of a deterioration of the financial condition of the institutions that hold NNN’s cash deposits or the institutions or assets in which NNN has made short-term investments, the dislocation of the markets for NNN’s short-term investments, increased volatility in market rates for such investments or other factors; and

 

  

one or more lenders under the Credit Facility could fail and NNN may not be able to replace the financing commitment of any such lenders on favorable terms, or at all.

 

8


Table of Contents

NNN may be unable to obtain debt or equity capital on favorable terms, if at all.

NNN may be unable to obtain capital on favorable terms, if at all, to further its business objectives or meet its existing obligations. Nearly all of NNN’s debt, including the Credit Facility, is subject to balloon principal payments due at maturity. These maturities range between 2011 and 2017. The ability of NNN to make these scheduled principal payments may be adversely impacted by NNN’s inability to extend or refinance the Credit Facility, the inability to dispose of assets at an attractive price or the inability to obtain additional debt or equity capital. Capital that may be available may be materially more expensive or available under terms that are materially more restrictive than NNN’s existing capital which would have an adverse impact on NNN’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Loss of revenues from tenants would reduce NNN’s cash flow.

NNN’s five largest tenants accounted for an aggregate of approximately 29 percent of NNN’s annual base rent as of December 31, 2010. The default, financial distress, bankruptcy or liquidation of one or more of NNN’s tenants could cause substantial vacancies among NNN’s Investment Portfolio. Vacancies reduce NNN’s revenues, increase property expenses and could decrease the ultimate sale value of each such vacant property. Upon the expiration of the leases that are currently in place, the tenant may choose not to renew the lease and/or NNN may not be able to re-lease the vacant property at a comparable lease rate or without incurring additional expenditures in connection with such renewal or re-leasing.

A significant portion of the source of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is heavily concentrated in specific industry classifications, tenants and in specific geographic locations.

As of December 31, 2010, approximately,

 

  

53 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five retail lines of trade, including convenience stores (24 percent) and full-service restaurants (10 percent),

 

  

29 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five tenants, including The Pantry, Inc. (eight percent) and Susser Holdings Corp. (eight percent),

 

  

47 percent of NNN’s Investment Portfolio annual base rent is generated from five states, including Texas (19 percent) and Florida (10 percent).

Any financial hardship and/or economic changes in these lines of trade, tenants or states could have an adverse effect on NNN’s results of operations.

Owning real estate and indirect interests in real estate carries inherent risks.

NNN’s economic performance and the value of its real estate assets are subject to the risk that if NNN’s properties do not generate revenues sufficient to meet its operating expenses, including debt service, NNN’s cash flow and ability to pay distributions to its shareholders will be adversely affected. As a real estate company, NNN is susceptible to the following real estate industry risks, which are beyond its control:

 

  

changes in national, regional and local economic conditions and outlook,

 

  

decreases in consumer spending and retail sales,

 

  

economic downturns in the areas where NNN’s properties are located,

 

  

adverse changes in local real estate market conditions, such as an oversupply of space, reduction in demand for space, intense competition for tenants, or a geographic shift in the market away from NNN’s properties,

 

  

changes in tenant preferences that reduce the attractiveness of NNN’s properties to tenants,

 

  

changes in zoning, regulatory restrictions, or tax laws, and

 

  

changes in interest rates or availability of financing.

 

9


Table of Contents

All of these factors could result in decreases in market rental rates and increases in vacancy rates, which could adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.

NNN’s real estate investments are illiquid.

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, NNN’s ability to adjust the portfolio promptly in response to economic or other conditions is limited. Certain significant expenditures generally do not change in response to economic or other conditions, including: (i) debt service (if any), (ii) real estate taxes, and (iii) operating and maintenance costs. This combination of variable revenue and relatively fixed expenditures may result, under certain market conditions, in reduced earnings and could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.

Costs of complying with changes in governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect NNN’s results of operations.

NNN cannot predict what other laws or regulations will be enacted in the future, how future laws or regulations will be administered or interpreted, or how future laws or regulations will affect NNN’s properties, including, but not limited to environmental laws and regulations. Compliance with new laws or regulations, or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may require NNN, its retail tenants, or consumers to incur significant expenditures or impose significant liability and could cause a material adverse effect on NNN’s results of operation.

NNN may be subject to known or unknown environmental liabilities and hazardous materials on properties owned by NNN.

There may be known or unknown environmental liabilities associated with properties owned or acquired in the future by NNN. Certain particular uses of some properties may also have a heightened risk of environmental liability because of the hazardous materials used in performing services on those properties, such as convenience stores with underground petroleum storage tanks or auto parts and auto service businesses using lube, paint and machine solvents. Some of NNN’s properties may contain asbestos or asbestos-containing materials, or may contain or may develop mold or other bio-contaminants. Asbestos-containing materials must be handled, managed and removed in accordance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations. Mold and other bio-contaminants can produce airborne toxins, may cause a variety of health issues in individuals and must be remediated in accordance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations.

As part of its due diligence process, NNN generally obtains an environmental site assessment for each property it acquires. In cases where NNN intends to acquire real estate where some level of contamination may exist, NNN generally requires the seller or tenant to (i) remediate the contamination in accordance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, (ii) indemnify NNN for environmental liabilities, and/or (iii) agree to other arrangements deemed appropriate by NNN, including, under certain circumstances, the purchase of environmental insurance. Although sellers or tenants may be contractually responsible for remediating hazardous materials on a property and may be responsible for indemnifying NNN for any liability resulting from the use of a property and for any failure to comply with any applicable environmental laws, rules or regulations, NNN has no assurance that sellers or tenants shall be able to meet their remediation and indemnity obligations to NNN. A tenant or seller may not have the financial ability to meet its remediation and indemnity obligations to NNN when needed. Furthermore, NNN may have strict liability to governmental agencies or third parties as a result of the existence of hazardous materials on properties, whether or not NNN knew about or caused such hazardous materials to exist.

As of February 15, 2011 NNN has 59 Investment Properties currently under some level of environmental remediation. In general, the seller, the tenant or an adjacent land owner is responsible for the cost of the environmental remediation for each of these Investment Properties.

 

10


Table of Contents

If NNN is responsible for hazardous materials located on its properties, NNN’s liability may include investigation and remediation costs, property damage to third parties, personal injury to third parties, and governmental fines and penalties. Furthermore, the presence of hazardous materials on a property may adversely impact the property value or NNN’s ability to sell the property. Significant environmental liability could impact NNN’s results of operations, ability to make distributions to shareholders, and its ability to meet its debt obligations.

In order to mitigate exposure to environmental liability, NNN has an environmental insurance policy on certain of its convenience store and travel plaza properties which expires in August 2013. However, the policy is subject to exclusions and limitations and does not cover all of the properties owned by NNN, and for those properties covered under the policy, insurance may not fully compensate NNN for any environmental liability. NNN has no assurance that the insurer on its environmental insurance policy will be able to meet its obligations under the policy. NNN may not desire to renew the environmental insurance policy in place upon expiration or a replacement policy may not be available at a reasonable cost, if at all.

NNN may not be able to successfully execute its acquisition or development strategies.

NNN may not be able to implement its investment strategies successfully. Additionally, NNN cannot assure that its property portfolio will expand at all, or if it will expand at any specified rate or to any specified size. In addition, investment in additional real estate assets is subject to a number of risks. Because NNN expects to invest in markets other than the ones in which its current properties are located or properties which may be leased to tenants other than those to which NNN has historically leased properties, NNN will also be subject to the risks associated with investment in new markets or with new tenants that may be relatively unfamiliar to NNN’s management team.

NNN’s development activities are subject to, without limitation, risks relating to the availability and timely receipt of zoning and other regulatory approvals, the cost and timely completion of construction (including risks from factors beyond NNN’s control, such as weather or labor conditions or material shortages), the risk of finding tenants for the properties and the ability to obtain both construction and permanent financing on favorable terms. These risks could result in substantial unanticipated delays or expenses and, under certain circumstances, could prevent completion of development activities once undertaken or provide a tenant the opportunity to terminate a lease. Any of these situations may delay or eliminate proceeds or cash flows NNN expects from these projects, which could have an adverse effect on NNN’s financial condition.

NNN may not be able to dispose of properties consistent with its operating strategy.

NNN may be unable to sell properties targeted for disposition (including its Inventory Properties) due to adverse market conditions. This may adversely affect, among other things, NNN’s ability to sell under favorable terms, execute its operating strategy, achieve target earnings or returns, retire or repay debt or pay dividends.

A change in the assumptions used to determine the value of commercial mortgage residual interests could adversely affect NNN’s financial position.

As of December 31, 2010, the Residuals had a carrying value of $15,915,000. The value of these Residuals is based on assumptions made by NNN to determine their value. These assumptions include discount rate, loan loss, prepayment speed and interest rate assumptions made by NNN to determine their value. If actual experience differs materially from these assumptions, the actual future cash flow could be less than expected and the value of the Residuals, as well as NNN’s earnings, could decline.

 

11


Table of Contents

NNN may suffer a loss in the event of a default or bankruptcy of a borrower.

If a borrower defaults on a mortgage, structured finance loan or other loan made by NNN, and does not have sufficient assets to satisfy the loan, NNN may suffer a loss of principal and interest. In the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN may not be able to recover against all or any of the assets of the borrower, or the assets of the borrower may not be sufficient to satisfy the balance due on the loan. In addition, certain of NNN’s loans may be subordinate to other debt of a borrower. These investments are typically loans secured by a borrower’s pledge of its ownership interests in the entity that owns the real estate or other assets. These agreements are typically subordinated to senior loans secured by other loans encumbering the underlying real estate or assets. Subordinated positions are generally subject to a higher risk of nonpayment of principal and interest than the more senior loans. As of December 31, 2010, mortgages and notes receivables had an outstanding principal balance of $29,750,000. If a borrower defaults on the debt senior to NNN’s loan, or in the event of the bankruptcy of a borrower, NNN’s loan will be satisfied only after the borrower’s senior creditors’ claims are satisfied. Where debt senior to NNN’s loans exists, the presence of intercreditor arrangements may limit NNN’s ability to amend loan documents, assign the loans, accept prepayments, exercise remedies and control decisions made in bankruptcy proceedings relating to borrowers. Bankruptcy proceedings and litigation can significantly increase the time needed for NNN to acquire underlying collateral, if any, in the event of a default, during which time the collateral may decline in value. In addition, there are significant costs and delays associated with the foreclosure process.

Certain provisions of NNN’s leases or loan agreements may be unenforceable.

NNN’s rights and obligations with respect to its leases, structured finance loans, mortgage loans or other loans are governed by written agreements. A court could determine that one or more provisions of such an agreement are unenforceable, such as a particular remedy, a loan prepayment provision or a provision governing NNN’s security interest in the underlying collateral of a borrower or lessee. NNN could be adversely impacted if this were to happen with respect to an asset or group of assets.

Property ownership through joint ventures and partnerships could limit NNN’s control of those investments.

Joint ventures or partnerships involve risks not otherwise present for direct investments by NNN. It is possible that NNN’s co-venturers or partners may have different interests or goals than NNN at any time and they may take actions contrary to NNN’s requests, policies or objectives, including NNN’s policy with respect to maintaining its qualification as a REIT. Other risks of joint venture or partnership investments include impasses on decisions because in some instances no single co-venturer or partner has full control over the joint venture or partnership, respectively, or the co-venturer or partner may become insolvent, bankrupt or otherwise unable to contribute to the joint venture or partnership, respectively. Further, disputes may develop with a co-venturer or partner over decisions affecting the property, joint venture or partnership that may result in litigation, arbitration or some other form of dispute resolution.

Competition with numerous other REITs, commercial developers, real estate limited partnerships and other investors may impede NNN’s ability to grow.

NNN may not be in a position or have the opportunity in the future to complete suitable property acquisitions or developments on advantageous terms due to competition for such properties with others engaged in real estate investment activities. NNN’s inability to successfully acquire or develop new properties may affect NNN’s ability to achieve anticipated return on investment or realize its investment strategy, which could have an adverse effect on its results of operations.

 

12


Table of Contents

Operating losses from retail operations on certain Investment Properties may adversely impact NNN’s results of operations.

In June 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on certain Investment Properties. A third party manages and staffs these operations on behalf of NNN. The results of business operations from these properties are subject to the typical execution risks inherent with many retail operations including: merchandising, pricing, customer service, competition, consumer preferences and behavior, safety, compliance with various federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, environmental contamination, unfavorable weather conditions, or other trends in the markets they serve. These factors could negatively impact NNN’s results of operations from these certain Investment Properties.

Uninsured losses may adversely affect NNN’s ability to pay outstanding indebtedness.

NNN’s properties are generally covered by comprehensive liability, fire, and extended insurance coverage. NNN believes that the insurance carried on its properties is adequate in accordance with industry standards. There are, however, types of losses (such as from hurricanes, wars or earthquakes) which may be uninsurable, or the cost of insuring against these losses may not be economically justifiable. If an uninsured loss occurs or a loss exceeds policy limits, NNN could lose both its invested capital and anticipated revenues from the property, thereby reducing NNN’s cash flow.

Acts of violence, terrorist attacks or war may affect the markets in which NNN operates and NNN’s results of operations.

Terrorist attacks or other acts of violence may negatively affect NNN’s operations. There can be no assurance that there will not be terrorist attacks against businesses within the United States. These attacks may directly impact NNN’s physical facilities or the businesses or the financial condition of its tenants, developers, borrowers, lenders or financial institutions with which NNN has a relationship. The United States is engaged in armed conflict, which could have an impact on these parties. The consequences of armed conflict are unpredictable, and NNN may not be able to foresee events that could have an adverse effect on its business.

More generally, any of these events or threats of these events could cause consumer confidence and spending to decrease or result in increased volatility in the United States and worldwide financial markets and economies. They also could result in, or cause a deepening of, economic recession in the United States or abroad. Any of these occurrences could have an adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition or results of operations.

Vacant properties or bankrupt tenants could adversely affect NNN’s business or financial condition.

As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 37 vacant, un-leased Investment Properties, which accounted for approximately three percent of total Investment Properties held in NNN’s Investment Portfolio. NNN is actively marketing these properties for sale or lease but may not be able to sell or lease these properties on favorable terms or at all. The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from the rejection by any bankrupt tenant of any of their respective leases with NNN could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations of NNN if NNN is unable to re-lease the Investment Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of January 31, 2011, approximately one percent of the total gross leasable area of NNN’s Investment Portfolio was leased to four tenants that have filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and have the right to reject or affirm their lease with NNN.

 

13


Table of Contents

The amount of debt NNN has and the restrictions imposed by that debt could adversely affect NNN’s business and financial condition.

As of December 31, 2010, NNN had total mortgage debt outstanding of approximately $24,269,000, total unsecured notes payable of $948,416,000 and $161,000,000 outstanding on the unsecured Credit Facility. NNN’s organizational documents do not limit the level or amount of debt that it may incur. If NNN incurs additional indebtedness and permits a higher degree of leverage, debt service requirements would increase and could adversely affect NNN’s financial condition and results of operations, as well as NNN’s ability to pay principal and interest on the outstanding indebtedness or cash dividends to its stockholders. In addition, increased leverage could increase the risk that NNN may default on its debt obligations.

The amount of debt outstanding at any time could have important consequences to NNN’s stockholders. For example, it could:

 

  

require NNN to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, real estate investments and other appropriate business opportunities that may arise in the future,

 

  

increase NNN’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions,

 

  

limit NNN’s ability to obtain any additional financing it may need in the future for working capital, debt refinancing, capital expenditures, real estate investments, development or other general corporate purposes,

 

  

make it difficult to satisfy NNN’s debt service requirements,

 

  

limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends in cash on its outstanding common and preferred stock,

 

  

limit NNN’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the factors that affect the profitability of its business, and

 

  

limit NNN’s flexibility in conducting its business, which may place NNN at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt or debt with less restrictive terms.

NNN’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal or interest on its debt, or to retire or refinance such debt will depend primarily on its future performance, which to a certain extent is subject to the creditworthiness of its tenants, competition, and economic, financial, and other factors beyond its control. There can be no assurance that NNN’s business will continue to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service its debt or meet its other cash needs. If NNN is unable to generate sufficient cash flow from its business, it may be required to refinance all or a portion of its existing debt, sell assets or obtain additional financing to meet its debt obligations and other cash needs.

NNN cannot assure stockholders that any such refinancing, sale of assets or additional financing would be possible or, if possible, on terms and conditions, including but not limited to the interest rate, which NNN would find acceptable or would not result in a material decline in earnings.

 

14


Table of Contents

NNN is obligated to comply with financial and other covenants in its debt that could restrict its operating activities, and the failure to comply with such covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt.

As of December 31, 2010, NNN had approximately $1,133, 685,000 of outstanding indebtedness, of which approximately $24,269,000 was secured indebtedness. NNN’s unsecured debt contains various restrictive covenants which include, among others, provisions restricting NNN’s ability to:

 

  

incur or guarantee additional debt,

 

  

make certain distributions, investments and other restricted payments,

 

  

enter into transactions with certain affiliates,

 

  

create certain liens,

 

  

consolidate, merge or sell NNN’s assets, and

 

  

pre-pay debt.

NNN’s secured debt generally contains customary covenants, including, among others, provisions:

 

  

relating to the maintenance of the property securing the debt,

 

  

restricting its ability to sell, assign or further encumber the properties securing the debt,

 

  

restricting its ability to incur additional debt,

 

  

restricting its ability to amend or modify existing leases, and

 

  

relating to certain prepayment restrictions.

NNN’s ability to meet some of its debt covenants, including covenants related to the condition of the property or payment of real estate taxes, may be dependent on the performance by NNN’s tenants under their leases.

In addition, certain covenants in NNN’s debt, including its Credit Facility, require NNN, among other things, to:

 

  

limit certain leverage ratios,

 

  

maintain certain minimum interest and debt service coverage ratios, and

 

  

limit investments in certain types of assets.

NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.

 

15


Table of Contents

The market value of NNN’s equity and debt securities is subject to various factors that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility.

As with other publicly traded securities, the market price of NNN’s equity and debt securities depends on various factors, which may change from time-to-time and/or may be unrelated to NNN’s financial condition, operating performance or prospects that may cause significant fluctuations or volatility in such prices. These factors, among others, include:

 

  

general economic and financial market conditions including the weak economic environment,

 

  

level and trend of interest rates,

 

  

NNN’s ability to access the capital markets to raise additional capital,

 

  

the issuance of additional equity or debt securities,

 

  

changes in NNN’s funds from operations or earnings estimates,

 

  

changes in NNN’s debt ratings or analyst ratings,

 

  

NNN’s financial condition and performance,

 

  

market perception of NNN compared to other REITs, and

 

  

market perception of REITs compared to other investment sectors.

NNN’s failure to qualify as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes could result in significant tax liability.

NNN intends to operate in a manner that will allow NNN to continue to qualify as a REIT. NNN believes it has been organized as, and its past and present operations qualify NNN as a REIT. However, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) could successfully assert that NNN is not qualified as such. In addition, NNN may not remain qualified as a REIT in the future. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) for which there are only limited judicial or administrative interpretations and involves the determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within NNN’s control. Furthermore, new tax legislation, administrative guidance or court decisions, in each instance potentially with retroactive effect, could make it more difficult or impossible for NNN to qualify as a REIT or avoid significant tax liability.

If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT, it would not be allowed a deduction for dividends paid to stockholders in computing taxable income and would become subject to federal income tax at regular corporate rates. In this event, NNN could be subject to potentially significant tax liabilities and penalties. Unless entitled to relief under certain statutory provisions, NNN would also be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which the qualification was lost.

Even if NNN remains qualified as a REIT, NNN may face other tax liabilities that reduce operating results and cash flow.

Even if NNN remains qualified for taxation as a REIT, NNN may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on its income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes, such as mortgage recording taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease earnings and cash available for distribution to stockholders. In addition, in order to meet the REIT qualification requirements, NNN holds some of its assets through the TRS.

 

16


Table of Contents

Adverse legislative or regulatory tax changes could reduce NNN’s earnings, cash flow and market price of NNN’s common stock.

At any time, the federal and state income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may change. Any such changes may have retroactive effect, and could adversely affect NNN or its stockholders. For example, legislation enacted in 2003 and extended in 2006 generally reduced the federal income tax rate on most dividends paid by corporations to individual investors to a maximum of 15 percent (through 2012). REIT dividends, with limited exceptions, will not benefit from the rate reduction, because a REIT’s income generally is not subject to corporate level tax. As such, this legislation could cause shares in non-REIT corporations to be a more attractive investment to individual investors than shares in REITs, and could have an adverse effect on the value of NNN’s common stock.

Compliance with REIT requirements, including distribution requirements, may limit NNN’s flexibility and negatively affect NNN’s operating decisions.

To maintain its status as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, NNN must meet certain requirements on an on-going basis, including requirements regarding its sources of income, the nature and diversification of its assets, the amounts NNN distributes to its stockholders and the ownership of its shares. NNN may also be required to make distributions to its stockholders when it does not have funds readily available for distribution or at times when NNN’s funds are otherwise needed to fund capital expenditures or debt service requirements. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders, providing it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.

Changes in accounting pronouncements could adversely impact NNN’s or NNN’s tenants’ reported financial performance.

Accounting policies and methods are fundamental to how NNN records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. From time to time the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) and the Commission, who create and interpret appropriate accounting standards, may change the financial accounting and reporting standards or their interpretation and application of these standards that govern the preparation of NNN’s financial statements. These changes could have a material impact on NNN’s reported financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, NNN could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in restating prior period financial statements. Similarly, these changes could have a material impact on NNN’s tenants’ reported financial condition or results of operations and affect their preferences regarding leasing real estate.

NNN’s failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results and share price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. If NNN fails to maintain the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting, as such standards may be modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, NNN may not be able to ensure that it can conclude on an ongoing basis that it has effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Moreover, effective internal control over financial reporting, particularly those related to revenue recognition, are necessary for NNN to produce reliable financial reports and to maintain its qualification as a REIT and are important in helping to prevent financial fraud. If NNN cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its business and operating results could be harmed, REIT qualification could be jeopardized, investors could lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information, and the trading price of NNN’s shares could drop significantly.

 

17


Table of Contents

NNN’s ability to pay dividends in the future is subject to many factors.

NNN’s ability to pay dividends may be impaired if any of the risks described in this section were to occur. In addition, payment of NNN’s dividends depends upon NNN’s earnings, financial condition, maintenance of NNN’s REIT status and other factors as NNN’s Board of Directors may deem relevant from time to time.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.  Properties

Please refer to Item 1. “Business.”

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various legal actions that management believes are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Item 4.  [Removed and Reserved]

 

18


Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The common stock of NNN currently is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “NNN.” Set forth below is a line graph comparing the cumulative total stockholder return on NNN’s common stock, based on the market price of the common stock and assuming reinvestment of dividends, with the FTSE National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Equity Index (“NAREIT”) and the S&P 500 Index (“S&P 500”) for the five year period commencing December 31, 2005 and ending December 31, 2010. The graph assumes an investment of $100 on December 31, 2005.

Comparison to Five-Year Cumulative Total Return

LOGO

 

19


Table of Contents

For each calendar quarter indicated, the following table reflects respective high, low and closing sales prices for the common stock as quoted by the NYSE and the dividends paid per share in each such period.

 

2010

  First
Quarter
   Second
Quarter
   Third
Quarter
   Fourth
Quarter
   Year 

High

  $23.73    $24.59    $25.94    $28.11    $28.11  

Low

   19.19     20.50     20.82     24.85     19.19  

Close

   22.83     21.44     25.11     26.50     26.50  

Dividends paid per share

   0.375     0.375     0.380     0.380     1.510  

2009

                    

High

  $17.52    $19.48    $22.80    $21.59    $22.80  

Low

   12.26     14.95     15.85     18.87     12.26  

Close

   15.84     17.35     21.47     21.22     21.22  

Dividends paid per share

   0.375     0.375     0.375     0.375     1.500  

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

 

   2010   2009 

Ordinary dividends

  $1.072446     71.0229%    $1.495182     99.6788%  

Qualified dividends

   0.081661     5.4080%     -     -  

Capital gain

   0.000861     0.0570%     0.003051     0.2034%  

Unrecaptured Section 1250 gain

   0.000498     0.0330%     0.001767     0.1178%  

Nontaxable distributions

   0.354534     23.4791%     -     -  
                    
  $1.510000     100.0000%    $1.500000     100.0000%  
                    

NNN intends to pay regular quarterly dividends to its stockholders, although all future distributions will be declared and paid at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon cash generated by operating activities, NNN’s financial condition, capital requirements, annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

In February 2011, NNN paid dividends to its stockholders of $31,678,000 or $0.38 per share of common stock.

On January 31, 2011, there were 1,848 stockholders of record of common stock.

 

20


Table of Contents

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data

Historical Financial Highlights

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

      2010          2009          2008          2007          2006     

Gross revenues(1)

 $237,062   $243,932   $247,352   $208,629   $180,877  

Earnings from continuing operations

  71,202    56,129    97,858    76,642    58,739  

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

  73,353    56,399    119,971    155,743    184,422  

Net earnings attributable to NNN

  72,997    54,810    117,153    154,599    181,800  

Total assets

  2,713,575    2,590,962    2,649,471    2,539,673    1,917,516  

Total debt

  1,133,685    987,346    1,027,391    1,049,154    890,127  

Total stockholders’ equity

  1,527,483    1,564,240    1,566,860    1,417,647    1,109,479  

Cash dividends declared to:

     

Common stockholders

  125,391    120,256    110,107    92,989    76,035  

Series A preferred stockholders

  -    -    -    -    4,376  

Series B convertible preferred stockholders

  -    -    -    -    419  

Series C preferred stockholders

  6,785    6,785    6,785    6,785    923  

Weighted average common shares:

     

Basic

  82,715,645    79,846,258    74,249,137    66,152,437    57,428,063  

Diluted

  82,849,362    79,953,499    74,344,231    66,263,980    57,965,508  

Per share information:

     

Earnings from continuing operations:

     

Basic

 $0.77   $0.60   $1.22   $1.05   $0.88  

Diluted

  0.77    0.60    1.22    1.05    0.88  

Net earnings:

     

Basic

  0.80    0.60    1.48    2.23    3.05  

Diluted

  0.80    0.60    1.48    2.22    3.03  

Cash dividends declared to:

     

Common stockholders

  1.51    1.50    1.48    1.40    1.32  

Series A preferred stockholders

  -    -    -    -    2.45625  

Series B convertible preferred stockholders

  -    -    -    -    41.875  

Series C preferred depositary stockholders

  1.84375    1.84375    1.84375    1.84375    0.250955  

Other data:

     

Cash flows provided by (used in):

     

Operating activities

 $187,914   $149,502   $237,459   $130,147   $1,676  

Investing activities

  (220,260  (28,063  (256,304  (536,717  (90,099

Financing activities

  19,169    (108,840  (6,028  432,394    81,864  

Funds from operations – diluted(2)

  108,328    89,506    132,996    110,589    86,749  

 

 (1)Gross revenues include revenues from NNN’s continuing and discontinued operations. In accordance with FASB guidance on Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, NNN has classified the revenues related to (i) all Investment Properties that were sold and leasehold interest which expired, (ii) all Inventory Properties which generated revenues prior to disposition, and (iii) all Investment and Inventory Properties which generated revenue and were held for sale at December 31, 2010, as discontinued operations.

 

 (2)The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) developed Funds from Operations (“FFO”) as a relative non-GAAP financial measure of performance of a REIT in order to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the basis determined under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). FFO is defined by NAREIT and is used by NNN as follows: net earnings (computed in accordance with GAAP) plus depreciation and amortization of assets unique to the real estate industry, excluding gains (or including losses) on the disposition of certain assets and NNN’s share of these items from NNN’s unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

FFO is generally considered by industry analysts to be the most appropriate measure of operating performance of real estate companies. FFO does not necessarily represent cash provided by operating activities in accordance with GAAP and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of NNN’s operating performance or to cash flow as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Management considers FFO an appropriate measure of operating performance of an equity REIT because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of the real estate assets diminishes

 

21


Table of Contents

predictably over time, and because industry analysts have accepted it as an operating performance measure. NNN’s computation of FFO may differ from the methodology for calculating FFO used by other equity REITs, and therefore, may not be comparable to such other REITs.

NNN has earnings from discontinued operations in both of its financial segments; investment assets and inventory assets. All property dispositions from NNN’s investment segment are classified as discontinued operations. In addition, certain properties in NNN’s inventory segment that have generated revenues before disposition are classified as discontinued operations. These inventory properties have not historically been classified as discontinued operations, therefore, prior period comparable consolidated financial statements have been restated to include these properties in its earnings from discontinued operations. These adjustments resulted in a decrease in NNN’s reported total revenues and total and per share earnings from continuing operations and an increase in NNN’s earnings from discontinued operations. However, NNN’s total and per share net earnings available to common stockholders is not affected.

The following table reconciles FFO to their most directly comparable GAAP measure, net earnings for the years ended December 31:

 

  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 

Reconciliation of funds from operations:

     

Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders

 $72,997   $54,810   $117,153   $154,599   $181,800  

Real estate depreciation and amortization:

     

Continuing operations

  43,464    42,838    40,336    28,632    19,099  

Discontinued operations

  186    1,438    1,454    1,750    3,320  

Partnership/joint venture real estate depreciation

  178    178    177    31    463  

Partnership gain on sale of asset

  -    -    -    -    (262

Gain on disposition of equity investment

  -    -    -    -    (11,373

Gain on disposition of investment assets

  (1,134  (2,392  (9,980  (56,625  (91,332

Gain on disposition of inventory assets

  (578  (581  (9,359  (11,013  (9,667
                    

FFO

  115,113    96,291    139,781    117,374    92,048  

Series A preferred stock dividends(1)

  -    -    -    -    (4,376

Series B convertible preferred stock dividends(1)

  -    -    -    -    (419

Series C preferred stock dividends

  (6,785  (6,785  (6,785  (6,785  (923
                    

FFO available to common stockholders – basic

  108,328    89,506    132,996    110,589    86,330  

Series B convertible preferred stock dividends, if dilutive

  -    -    -    -    419  
                    

FFO available to common stockholders – diluted

 $108,328   $89,506   $132,996   $110,589   $86,749  
                    

 

 (1)

The Series A and Series B preferred stock are no longer outstanding.

For a discussion of material events affecting the comparability of the information reflected in the selected financial data, refer to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

 

22


Table of Contents

Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with “Item 6. Selected Financial Data,” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the forward-looking disclaimer language in italics before “Item 1. Business.”

The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable real estate investment trust subsidiaries. These subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

Overview

NNN, a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable, and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). NNN acquires, owns, invests in and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”). The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”).

As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 1,195 Investment Properties (including 11 properties with retail operations that NNN operates), with an aggregate gross leasable area of approximately 12,972,000 square feet, located in 46 states. Approximately 97 percent of total properties in NNN’s Investment Portfolio was leased or operated as of December 31, 2010. As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 17 Inventory Properties.

NNN’s management team focuses on certain key indicators to evaluate the financial condition and operating performance of NNN. The key indicators for NNN include items such as: the composition of NNN’s Investment Portfolio (such as tenant, geographic and line of trade diversification), the occupancy rate of NNN’s Investment Portfolio, certain financial performance ratios and profitability measures, and industry trends and performance compared to that of NNN.

NNN continues to maintain its diversification by tenant, geography and tenant’s line of trade. NNN’s highest lines of trade concentrations are the convenience store and restaurant (including full and limited service) sectors. These sectors represent a large part of the freestanding retail property marketplace and NNN’s management believes these sectors present attractive investment opportunities. NNN’s Investment Portfolio is geographically concentrated in the south and southeast United States, which are regions of historically above-average population growth. Given these concentrations, any financial hardship within these sectors or geographic locations, respectively, could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and operating performance of NNN.

As of year end December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, Investment Properties have remained at least 96 percent leased. The Investment Portfolio’s average remaining lease term of 12 years has remained fairly constant over the past three years which, coupled with its net lease structure, provides enhanced probability of maintaining occupancy and operating earnings.

The weak economic environment during the past three years has made it more difficult and more expensive to obtain debt and equity capital, and has reduced the pace of investments in new acquisitions or developments as well as the volume of dispositions. Additionally, the weak economic and retail environment has resulted in more retailers filing for bankruptcy and has made it more difficult to lease properties, which may have an adverse impact on NNN’s occupancy.

 

23


Table of Contents

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements in conformance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and judgments on assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as other disclosures in the financial statements. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments; however, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions, which in turn could have a material impact on NNN’s financial statements. A summary of NNN’s accounting policies and procedures are included in Note 1 of NNN’s consolidated financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of NNN’s consolidated financial statements.

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio.  NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.

Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease.  In accordance with the FASB guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases, and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values.

Real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, generally including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:

Operating method  –  Leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rental revenue varies during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.

Direct financing method  –  Leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.

Real Estate  –  Inventory Portfolio.  The TRS acquires and/or develops and owns properties primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate. The properties that are classified as held for sale at any given time may consist of properties that have been acquired in the marketplace with the intent to sell and properties that have been, or are currently being, constructed by the TRS. The TRS records the acquisition of the real estate at cost, including the acquisition and closing costs. The cost of the real estate developed by the TRS also includes direct and indirect costs of construction, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value.

Impairment  –  Real Estate.  Based upon the events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value

 

24


Table of Contents

of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market condition or the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, at Fair Value.  Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The commercial mortgage residual interests were acquired in connection with the acquisition of Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”). NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value. In 2010, NNN acquired the 21.1% non-controlling interest in its majority owned and controlled subsidiary, OAMI, for $1,603,000 pursuant to which OAMI became a wholly owned subsidiary of NNN. NNN accounted for the transaction as an equity transaction in accordance with the FASB guidance on consolidation.

Revenue Recognition.  Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance on accounting for leases, based on the terms of the lease at the time of acquisition of the leased asset. Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant.

New Accounting Pronouncements.  Refer to Note 1 to the December 31, 2010, Consolidated Financial Statements.

Use of Estimates.  Additional critical accounting policies of NNN include management’s estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Additional critical accounting policies include management’s estimates of the useful lives used in calculating depreciation expense relating to real estate assets, the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets, including the commercial mortgage residual interests, the recoverability of the income tax benefit, the collectibility of receivables from tenants, including accrued rental income and capitalized overhead relating to development projects. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Results of Operations

Property Analysis – Investment Portfolio

General.  The following table summarizes NNN’s Investment Portfolio as of December 31:

 

   2010   2009   2008 

Investment Properties Owned:

      

Number

   1,195     1,015     1,005  

Total gross leasable area (square feet)

   12,972,000     11,373,000     11,251,000  

Investment Properties:

      

Leased

   1,147     966     972  

Operated

   11     12     -  

Percent of Investment Properties – leased and operated

   97%     96%     97%  

Weighted average remaining lease term (years)

   12     12     13  

Total gross leasable area (square feet) – leased and operated

   12,215,000     10,508,000     10,728,000  

 

25


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the lease expirations, assuming none of the tenants exercise renewal options, of NNN’s Investment Portfolio for each of the next 10 years and then thereafter in the aggregate as of December 31, 2010:

 

   

% of
Annual
Base Rent
(1)

   # of
Properties
   Gross
Leasable
Area(2)
       % of
Annual
Base
Rent
(1)
   # of
Properties
   Gross
Leasable
Area(2)
 

2011

   1.5%     18     260,000     2017     3.9%     28     682,000  

2012

   3.1%     35     520,000     2018     2.6%     24     345,000  

2013

   4.4%     40     839,000     2019     4.0%     41     618,000  

2014

   4.4%     42     577,000     2020     4.0%     83     694,000  

2015

   4.5%     72     1,011,000     Thereafter     65.4%     745     6,167,000  

2016

   2.2%     19     407,000          

(1)     Based on the annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2010.

(2)     Approximate square feet.

        

        

The following table summarizes the diversification of NNN’s Investment Portfolio based on the top 10 lines of trade:

 

    

Lines of Trade

          2010                   2009                   2008         
 1.    Convenience Stores   23.7%     26.7%     25.7%  
 2.    Restaurants – Full Service   10.1%     9.2%     8.7%  
 3.    Automotive Parts   7.8%     6.8%     5.1%  
 4.    Theaters   5.7%     6.3%     6.1%  
 5.    Automotive Service   5.3%     5.7%     8.9%  
 6.    Sporting Goods   4.5%     3.2%     3.3%  
 7.    Restaurants – Limited Service   4.1%     3.5%     3.3%  
 8.    Drug Stores   4.0%     4.1%     4.0%  
 9.    Books   3.8%     4.1%     4.0%  
 10.    Grocery   2.7%     2.9%     2.6%  
  Other   28.3%     27.5%     28.3%  
                 
      100.0%      100.0%      100.0%  
                 

       

(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31 of the respective year.

        

The following table shows the top 10 states in which NNN’s Investment Properties are located in as of December 31, 2010:

 

   

State

  # of
    Properties     
  %
of Annual

Base Rent(1)
 

  1.

  Texas  220   18.7%  

  2.

  Florida  93   10.0%  

  3.

  Illinois  47   6.7%  

  4.

  North Carolina  73   6.2%  

  5.

  Georgia  60   5.0%  

  6.

  Indiana  39   4.4%  

  7.

  Ohio  38   4.1%  

  8.

  Pennsylvania  84   3.9%  

  9.

  Tennessee  33   2.9%  

10.

  Missouri  28   2.9%  
  Other  480   35.2%  
          
    1,195   100.0%  
          

(1)     Based on annualized base rent for all leases in place as of December 31, 2010.

          

 

26


Table of Contents

Property Acquisitions.  The following table summarizes the Investment Property acquisitions for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010   2009   2008 

Acquisitions:

      

Number of Investment Properties

   194     8     109  

Gross leasable area (square feet)

   1,700,000     290,000     868,000  

Total dollars invested(1)

  $      256,077    $      36,335    $      355,107  

(1)     Includes dollars invested on projects under construction for each respective year.

         

Property Dispositions.  The following table summarizes the Investment Properties sold by NNN for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

  2010   2009   2008 

Number of properties

  14     9     19  

Gross leasable area (square feet)

      100,000         234,000         290,000  

Net sales proceeds

 $15,980    $15,621    $59,796  

Net gain

 $1,134    $2,392    $9,980  

NNN typically uses the proceeds from property sales either to pay down the outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) or reinvest in real estate.

Property Analysis – Inventory Portfolio

General.  The following table summarizes the number of properties held for sale in NNN’s Inventory Portfolio as of December 31:

 

  2010   2009   2008 

Completed Inventory Properties

  10     13     24  

Properties under construction

  -     -     1  

Land parcels

  7     6     7  
              

Total Inventory Properties

  17     19     32  
              

NNN transferred 11 properties from the Inventory Portfolio to the Investment Portfolio in December 2009.

Property Acquisitions.  The following table summarizes the property acquisitions and dollars invested in the Inventory Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

  2010   2009   2008 

Number of properties acquired

  -     2     7  

Total dollars invested(1)

 $493    $2,633    $29,539  

(1)     Includes dollars invested in projects under construction or tenant improvements for each respective year.

         

 

27


Table of Contents

Property Dispositions.  The following table summarizes the number of Inventory Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized from the disposition of real estate held for sale included in earnings from continuing and discontinued operations for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009  2008 
   # of
Properties
   Gain  # of
Properties
   Gain  # of
Properties
   Gain 

Continuing operations

   2    $641    2    $37    1    $21  

Noncontrolling interest

     (320    (14    (10
                   

Total continuing operations attributable to NNN

     321      23      11  
                   

Discontinued operations

   2     300    2     558    24     12,644  

Noncontrolling interest

     (43    -      (3,297
                   

Total discontinued operations attributable to NNN

     257      558      9,347  
                            
               4    $    578                4    $    581            25    $9,358  
                            

Revenue from Continuing Operations Analysis

General.  During the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN’s rental income increased primarily due to the acquisition of Investment Properties (See “Results of Operations – Property Analysis – Investment Portfolio – Property Acquisitions”). NNN anticipates increases in rental income will continue to come from additional property acquisitions and increases in rents pursuant to lease terms.

The following summarizes NNN’s revenues from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):

 

  2010  2009  2008  Percent of Total  2010
Versus
2009
Percent

Increase
(Decrease)
  2009
Versus
2008
Percent

Increase
(Decrease)
 
      
    2010  2009  2008   

Rental Income(1)

 $215,132   $213,666   $209,541    93.9%    92.6%    92.3%    0.7%    2.0%  

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

  7,438    8,361    6,980    3.3%    3.6%    3.1%    (11.0)%   19.8%  

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

  3,026    4,535    5,807    1.3%    2.0%    2.6%    (33.3)%   (21.9)% 

Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests

  3,460    4,252    4,636    1.5%    1.8%    2.0%    (18.6)%   (8.3)% 
                          

Total revenues from continuing operations

 $229,056   $230,814   $226,964    100.0%    100.0%    100.0%    (0.8)%   1.7%  
                          

(1)     Includes rental income from operating leases, earned income from direct financing leases and percentage rent from continuing operations (“Rental Income”).

         

 

28


Table of Contents

Revenue from Operations by Source of Income.  NNN has identified two primary operating segments, and thus, sources of revenue: (i) earnings from NNN’s Investment Assets, and (ii) earnings from NNN’s Inventory Assets. NNN revenues from continuing operations come primarily from Investment Assets. The revenues generated from NNN’s Inventory Assets are typically classified as discontinued operations.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2010 to Year Ended December 31, 2009.

Rental Income.  Rental Income remained relatively stable in amount and as a percent of the total revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to 2009.

Real Estate Expense Reimbursement from Tenants.  Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants decreased for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to 2009 but remained fairly consistent as a percentage of total revenues from continuing operations. The decrease is primarily attributable to the increase in reimbursed tax assessments in 2009 as compared to 2010.

Interest and Other Income from Real Estate Transactions.  Interest and other income from real estate transactions decreased for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to 2009, primarily due to a lower weighted average principal balance and a lower weighted average interest rate on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments during the year ended December 31, 2010. For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the weighted average outstanding principal balance and interest rates on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments was $31,925,000 at 9.04% and $38,968,000 at 9.50%, respectively. The decrease was also due to two defaulted loans at December 31, 2010.

Interest Income on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests.  Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) decreased for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to December 31, 2009, but remained fairly stable as a percent of total revenue from continuing operations. The decrease in interest income on Residuals is primarily the result of declining loan balances from prepayments and scheduled loan amortization.

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2009 to Year Ended December 31, 2008.

Rental Income.  Rental Income increased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008, due to a full year of Rental Income from the 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet which were acquired during 2008. Additionally, eight Investment Properties were acquired in 2009 with an aggregate gross leasable area of 290,000 square feet. In addition, NNN recorded $5,072,000 as compared to $2,671,000 in lease termination fees and rent settlement fees during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Real Estate Expense Reimbursement from Tenants.  Real estate expense reimbursements from tenants increased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008. The increase is attributable to the reimbursements from certain properties acquired in 2008 as well as reimbursements resulting from the re-leasing of existing vacancies.

Interest and Other Income from Real Estate Transactions.  Interest and other income from real estate transactions decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008, primarily due to a lower weighted average principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments during the year ended December 31, 2009. For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the weighted average outstanding principal balance on NNN’s mortgages receivable and structured finance investments was $38,968,000 and $57,475,000, respectively.

Interest Income on Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests.  Interest income on Residuals decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to December 31, 2008 but remained stable as a percent of total revenue from continuing operations. The decrease in interest income on Residuals is primarily the

 

29


Table of Contents

result of the increase in the loan delinquencies and asset amortization, which is partially offset by a decrease in loan prepayments.

Analysis of Expenses from Continuing Operations

General.  During 2010, operating expenses from continuing operations decreased primarily due to lower impairment losses and other charges recorded during the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009. The following summarizes NNN’s expenses from continuing operations (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009  2008 

General and administrative

  $22,778   $21,773   $24,875  

Real estate

   13,534    13,642    10,152  

Depreciation and amortization

   48,328    46,539    43,668  

Impairment losses and other charges

   7,458    36,080    1,234  

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation

   3,995    498    758  

Restructuring costs

   -    731    -  
             

Total operating expenses

  $96,093   $119,263   $80,687  
             

Interest and other income

  $(1,513 $(1,371 $(3,748

Interest expense

   65,179    62,151    63,964  

Loss on interest rate hedge

   -    -    804  
             

Total other expenses (revenues)

  $    63,666   $    60,780   $    61,020  
             

 

  Percentage of Total
Operating Expenses
  Percentage of
Revenues from
Continuing Operations
  2010
Versus
2009
Percent
Increase

(Decrease)
  2009
Versus
2008
Percent
Increase

(Decrease)
 
  2010  2009  2008  2010  2009  2008   

General and administrative

  23.7%    18.3%    30.8%    9.9%    9.4%    11.0%    4.6%    (12.5)%  

Real estate

  14.1%    11.4%    12.6%    5.9%    5.9%    4.5%    (0.8)%    34.4%  

Depreciation and amortization

  50.2%    39.0%    54.1%    21.1%    20.2%    19.2%    3.8%    6.6%  

Impairment losses and other charges

  7.8%    30.3%    1.5%    3.3%    15.6%    0.5%    (79.3)%    2,823.8%  

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

  4.2%    0.4%    1.0%    1.7%    0.2%    0.3%    702.2%    (34.3)%  

Restructuring costs

  -    0.6%    -    -    0.3%    -    (100.0)%    N/C (1) 
                          

Total operating expenses

  100.0%    100.0%    100.0%    41.9%    51.6%    35.5%    (19.4)%    47.8%  
                          

Interest and other income

  (2.4)%    (2.3)%    (6.1)%    (0.7)%    (0.6)%    (1.7)%    10.4%    (63.4)%  

Interest expense

  102.4%    102.3%    104.8%    28.5%    26.9%    28.2%    4.9%    (2.8)%  

Loss on interest rate hedge

  -    -    1.3%    -    -    0.4%    -    (100.0)%  
                          

Total other expenses (revenues)

  100.0%    100.0%    100.0%    27.8%    26.3%    26.9%    4.7%    (0.4)%  
                          

(1)     Not calculable (“N/C”)

        

Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2010 to Year Ended December 31, 2009.

General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009 and increased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2010, is primarily attributable to an increase in noncash long-term incentive compensation. This increase is partially offset by a decrease in lost pursuit costs and capitalized overhead.

 

30


Table of Contents

Real Estate.  Real estate expenses increased as a percentage of total operating expenses, but remained stable as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009.

Depreciation and Amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expenses increased as a percentage of total operating expenses but remained fairly stable as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009. The dollar increase is primarily a result of an increase in the amortization of loan costs associated with a credit agreement NNN entered into in November 2009.

Impairment Losses and Other Charges.  Based upon the events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive return. Generally, NNN determines a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. The decrease in impairment losses and other charges is primarily due to real estate impairments of $28,884,000 recorded in 2009, as compared to zero in 2010.

Impairment  –  Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests Valuation.  In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation adjustment of $3,995,000 and $498,000, respectively, as a reduction of earnings from operations.

Restructuring Costs.  During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $731,000 in connection with a workforce reduction. No such costs were incurred during 2010.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense increased for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, and increased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations but remained relatively stable as a percentage of total operating expenses.

The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:

 

 (i)the repurchase of $11,000,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028 with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in 2009,

 

 (ii)the repurchase of $8,800,000 of convertible notes payable due September 2026 with an effective interest rate of 5.840% in 2009,

 

 (iii)the payoff of the $20,000,000 8.5% notes payable in September 2010,

 

 (iv)the increase of $7,037,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the Credit Facility for year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009,

 

 (v)the increase in the weighted average interest rate on the Credit Facility from 1.19% during the year ended December 31, 2009, to 3.80% during the year ended December 31, 2010,

 

 (vi)the decrease of $626,000 in capitalized interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, and

 

 (vii)the increase of $850,000 in amortization of loan commitment fees related to the Credit Facility entered into November 2009.

 

31


Table of Contents

Comparison of Year End December 31, 2009 to Year Ended December 31, 2008.

General and Administrative Expenses.  General and administrative expenses decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008 and decreased both as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, is primarily attributable to a decrease in compensation of personnel and a decrease in lost pursuit costs.

Real Estate.  Real estate expenses remained fairly stable as a percentage of total operating expenses, but increased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008. The increase in real estate expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009, is primarily attributable to an increase in tenant reimbursable real estate expenses from 2008 acquisitions as well as an increase in expenses related to un-leased properties.

Depreciation and Amortization.  Depreciation and amortization expenses decreased as a percentage of total operating expenses and increased as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The dollar increase is primarily a result of depreciation recognized on the 109 Investment Properties with an aggregate gross leasable area of 868,000 square feet acquired in 2008. This increase is partially offset by the additional amortization in connection with the termination of certain leases during 2008.

Impairment Losses and Other Charges.  Based upon the events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include changes in real estate market conditions, the ability of NNN to re-lease properties that are currently vacant or become vacant, and the ability to sell properties at an attractive return. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. As a result of the Company’s review of long-lived assets for impairments, for the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, NNN recorded real estate impairments totaling $28,884,000 and $1,234,000, respectively. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recognized a loss on a note receivable foreclosure of $7,196,000.

Impairment – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests Valuation.  In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, NNN recorded an other than temporary valuation adjustment of $498,000 and $758,000 respectively, as a reduction of earnings from operations.

Restructuring Costs.  During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $731,000 in connection with a workforce reduction. No such costs were incurred during 2008.

Interest Expense.  Interest expense decreased for the year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to the same period in 2008, and decreased as a percentage of total operating expenses and as a percentage of revenues from continuing operations. The decrease in interest expense is primarily attributable to a decrease of $99,907,000 in weighted average long-term debt outstanding.

The following represents the primary changes in debt that have impacted interest expense:

 

 (i)repurchase of $11,000,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028 with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in 2009,

 

 (ii)repurchase of $8,800,000 of convertible notes payable due September 2026 with an effective interest rate of 5.840% in 2009,

 

 (iii)issuance of $234,035,000 of convertible notes payable due June 2028, with an effective interest rate of 7.192% in March 2008,

 

32


Table of Contents
 (iv)payoff of the $100,000,000 7.125% notes payable in March 2008,

 

 (v)payoff of the $12,000,000 10.00% secured note payable in February 2008,

 

 (vi)the decrease of $78,860,000 in the weighted average debt outstanding on the Credit Facility for year ended December 31, 2009, as compared to 2008, and

 

 (vii)the decrease in weighted average interest rate on the Credit Facility from 3.83% during the year ended December 31, 2008, to 1.19% during the year ended December 31, 2009.

Discontinued Operations

Earnings (Loss)

NNN classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses related to its Investment Properties that were sold, its leasehold interests that expired or were terminated and any Investment Properties that were held for sale at December 31, 2010. NNN also classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses of its Inventory Properties that generated rental revenues. NNN records discontinued operations by NNN’s identified segments: (i) Investment Assets, and (ii) Inventory Assets. The following table summarizes the earnings from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

  2010  2009  2008 
 # of Sold
Properties
  Gain  Earnings/
(Loss)
  # of Sold
Properties
  Gain  Earnings/
(Loss)
  # of Sold
Properties
  Gain  Earnings/
(Loss)
 

Investment Assets

  14   $1,134   $1,859    9   $2,392   $1,776    19   $9,980   $12,914  

Inventory Assets

  2    300    292    2    558    (1,506  24    12,644    9,199  

Noncontrolling interests

  -    -    11    -    -    (166  -    -    (2,722
                                    
              16   $  1,434   $  2,162                11   $  2,950   $104                43   $  22,624   $  19,391  
                                    

NNN periodically sells Investment Properties and may reinvest the sales proceeds to purchase additional properties. NNN evaluates its ability to pay dividends to stockholders by considering the combined effect of income from continuing and discontinued operations.

Impairment Losses and Other Charges.  NNN periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions and the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Generally, NNN calculates a possible impairment by comparing the estimated future cash flows to the current net book value. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. During the years ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, NNN recognized real estate impairments on discontinued operations of $5,630,000, and $4,426,000, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN did not recognize any real estate impairments on discontinued operations.

Impact of Inflation

NNN’s leases typically contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on NNN’s results of operations. Tenant leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or, to a lesser extent, increases in the tenant’s sales volume. During times when inflation is greater than increases in rent, rent increases may not keep up with the rate of inflation.

 

33


Table of Contents

The Investment Properties are leased to tenants under long-term, net leases which typically require the tenant to pay certain operating expenses of a property, thus, NNN’s exposure to inflation is reduced. Inflation may have an adverse impact on NNN’s tenants.

Liquidity

General.  NNN’s demand for funds has been and will continue to be primarily for (i) payment of operating expenses and cash dividends; (ii) property acquisitions and development; (iii) origination of mortgages and notes receivable; (iv) capital expenditures; (v) payment of principal and interest on its outstanding indebtedness; and (vi) other investments.

NNN expects to meet these requirements (other than amounts required for additional property investments, mortgages and notes receivable) through cash provided from operations and NNN’s Credit Facility. NNN utilizes the Credit Facility to meet its short-term working capital requirements. As of December 31, 2010, $161,000,000 was outstanding and $239,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $647,000. NNN anticipates that any additional investments in properties, mortgages and notes receivables during the next 12 months will be funded by the Credit Facility, cash provided from operations, the issuance of long-term debt or the issuance of common or preferred equity or other instruments convertible into or exchangeable for common or preferred equity. However, there can be no assurance that additional financing or capital will be available, or that the terms will be acceptable or advantageous to NNN.

Cash and Cash Equivalents.  The table below summarizes NNN’s cash flows for each of the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

 

   2010  2009   2008 

Cash and cash equivalents:

     

Provided by operating activities

  $187,914   $149,502    $237,459  

Used in investing activities

       (220,260)        (28,063)         (256,304)  

Provided by (used in) financing activities

   19,169        (108,840)     (6,028
              

Increase (decrease)

   (13,177  12,599     (24,873

Net cash at beginning of period

   15,225    2,626     27,499  
              

Net cash at end of period

  $    2,048   $    15,225    $    2,626  
              

Cash provided by operating activities represents cash received primarily from rental income from tenants, proceeds from the disposition of Inventory Properties and interest income less cash used for general and administrative expenses, interest expense and acquisition of its Inventory Properties. NNN’s cash flow from operating activities, net of cash used in and provided by the acquisition and disposition of its Inventory Properties, has been sufficient to pay the distributions for each period presented. NNN uses proceeds from its Credit Facility to fund the acquisition of its Inventory Properties. The change in cash provided by operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, is primarily the result of changes in revenues and expenses as discussed in “Results of Operations.” Cash generated from operations is expected to fluctuate in the future.

Changes in cash for investing activities are primarily attributable to the acquisitions and dispositions of Investment Properties.

NNN’s financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010, included the following significant transactions:

 

  

$125,391,000 in dividends paid to common stockholders,

 

  

$6,785,000 in dividends paid to holders of the depositary shares of NNN’s Series C Preferred Stock,

 

34


Table of Contents
  

$17,631,000 in net proceeds from the issuance of 793,759 shares of common stock in connection with the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”), and

 

  

$161,000,000 in net proceeds from NNN’s Credit Facility,

 

  

$6,453,000 in repayments of mortgages, and

 

  

$20,000,000 in repayment of notes payable.

Financing Strategy.  NNN’s financing objective is to manage its capital structure effectively in order to provide sufficient capital to execute its operating strategy while servicing its debt requirements and providing value to NNN’s stockholders. NNN generally utilizes debt and equity security offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties, and to a lesser extent, internally generated funds to meet its capital needs.

NNN typically funds its short-term liquidity requirements including investments in additional Investment Properties with cash from its Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2010, $161,000,000 was outstanding and $239,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $647,000.

For the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN’s ratio of total liabilities to total gross assets (before accumulated depreciation) was approximately 40 percent and the secured indebtedness to total gross assets was approximately two percent. The total debt to total market capitalization was approximately 34 percent. Certain financial agreements to which NNN is a party contain covenants that limit NNN’s ability to incur debt under certain circumstances. The organizational documents of NNN do not limit the absolute amount or percentage of indebtedness that NNN may incur. Additionally, NNN may change its financing strategy.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments.  The information in the following table summarizes NNN’s contractual obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2010. The table presents principal cash flows by year-end of the expected maturity for debt obligations and commercial commitments outstanding as of December 31, 2010.

 

   Expected Maturity Date (dollars in thousands) 
   Total   2011  2012   2013  2014   2015   Thereafter 

Long-term debt(1)

  $986,004    $139,798(3)  $69,290    $223,898(3)  $150,881    $150,917    $251,220  

Credit Facility

   161,000     -    161,000     -    -     -     -  

Operating lease

   3,666     917    945     973    831     -     -  
                                 

Total contractual cash obligations(2)

  $1,150,670    $140,715   $231,235    $224,871   $151,712    $150,917    $251,220  
                                 

(1)     Includes amounts outstanding under the mortgages payable, convertible notes payable and notes payable and excludes unamortized note discounts.

(2)     Excludes $7,342 of accrued interest payable.

(3)     Maturity dates are based on put option dates under NNN’s convertible notes.

         

        

        

 

In addition to the contractual obligations outlined above, in connection with the development of 28 Investment Properties, NNN has agreed to fund construction commitments (including construction, land costs and tenant improvements) of $68,746,000. As of December 31, 2010, NNN had funded $50,196,000 of this commitment, with $18,550,000 remaining to be funded. As of December 31, 2010, NNN did not have any funding commitments relating to the development of Inventory Properties.

As of December 31, 2010, NNN had outstanding letters of credit totaling $647,000 under its Credit Facility.

 

35


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2010, NNN did not have any other material contractual cash obligations, such as purchase obligations, financing lease obligations or other long-term liabilities other than those reflected in the table. In addition to items reflected in the table, NNN has issued preferred stock with cumulative preferential cash distributions, as described below under “Dividends.”

Management anticipates satisfying these obligations with a combination of NNN’s cash provided from operations, current capital resources on hand, its Credit Facility, debt or equity financings and asset dispositions.

Generally the Investment Properties are leased under long-term net leases. Therefore, management anticipates that capital demands to meet obligations with respect to these Investment Properties will be modest for the foreseeable future and can be met with funds from operations and working capital. Certain of NNN’s Investment Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for certain costs and expenses associated with the Investment Property. Management anticipates the costs associated with NNN’s vacant Investment Properties or those Investment Properties that become vacant will also be met with funds from operations and working capital. NNN may be required to borrow under its Credit Facility or use other sources of capital in the event of unforeseen significant capital expenditures.

The lost revenues and increased property expenses resulting from vacant properties or uncollectibility of lease revenues could have a material adverse effect on the liquidity and results of operations if NNN is unable to release the Investment Properties at comparable rental rates and in a timely manner. As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 37 vacant, un-leased Investment Properties which accounted for approximately three percent of total Investment Properties held in NNN’s Investment Portfolio. Additionally, as of January 31, 2011, approximately one percent of the total gross leasable area of NNN’s Investment Portfolio was leased to four tenants that filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result, these tenants have the right to reject or affirm their leases with NNN.

In February 2011, one of NNN’s tenants, Borders Group, Inc. (“Borders”), which leased five Investment Properties from NNN, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In February 2011, Borders moved to reject three leases with NNN and retains the right to reject the remaining two leases with NNN.

In February 2011, one of NNN’s tenants, Robb & Stucky, LTD, which leases 1 Investment Property from NNN, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and retains the right to reject its lease with NNN.

On April 20, 2009, one of NNN’s tenants, Titlemax Holdings, LLC and its affiliated companies (“Titlemax”), which leased 30 Investment Properties from NNN, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In January 2010, Titlemax assumed all of its leases with NNN. In April 2010, Titlemax’s plan of reorganization was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court and Titlemax exited bankruptcy. Titlemax’s Chapter 11 filing did not have an effect on NNN’s operations or financial position.

In June 2010, one of NNN’s tenants, Majestic Liquor Stores, Inc. (“Majestic”), which leased 13 Investment Properties from NNN, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In addition, in June 2010, the principals of Majestic, (the “Majestic Principals”), which are the borrowers on a loan from NNN secured by one Majestic property, filed a petition of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In June 2010, Majestic elected to reject the leases of four properties owned by NNN and the one property securing the loan to the Majestic Principals. In November 2010 NNN foreclosed on the property securing the loan to the Majestic Principals. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN recorded a $5,625,000 charge in connection with the loan to the Majestic Principals. In December 2010, Majestic assumed all 9 of the remaining leases with NNN. Also in December 2010

 

36


Table of Contents

Majestic and Majestic Principals plan of reorganization was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy court and Majestic and the Majestic Principals exited bankruptcy.

Dividends.  NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, as amended, and related regulations and intends to continue to operate so as to remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that it distributes to its stockholders, provided that it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. If NNN fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate rates and will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for four years following the year during which qualification is lost. Such an event could materially adversely affect NNN’s income and ability to pay dividends.

One of NNN’s primary objectives, consistent with its policy of retaining sufficient cash for reserves and working capital purposes and maintaining its status as a REIT, is to distribute a substantial portion of its funds available from operations to its stockholders in the form of dividends. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, NNN declared and paid dividends to its common stockholders of $125,391,000, $120,256,000 and $110,107,000, respectively, or $1.51, $1.50 and $1.48 per share, respectively, of common stock.

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such common stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

 

  2010  2009  2008 

Ordinary dividends

 $1.072446    71.0229%   $1.495182    99.6788%   $1.480000    100.0000%  

Qualified dividends

  0.081661    5.4080%    -    -    -    -  

Capital gain

  0.000861    0.0570%    0.003051    0.2034%    -    -  

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

  0.000498    0.0330%    0.001767    0.1178%    -    -  

Nontaxable distributions

  0.354534    23.4791%    -    -    -    -  
                        
 $    1.510000    100.0000%   $    1.500000    100.0000%   $    1.480000    100.0000%  
                        

In February 2011, NNN paid dividends to its common stockholders of $31,678,000, or $0.38 per share of common stock.

Holders of NNN’s preferred stock issuance are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash distributions based on the stated rate and liquidation preference per annum.

NNN declared and paid dividends to its Series C Preferred stockholders of $6,785,000 or $1.84375 per depository share during each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.

The following presents the characterizations for tax purposes of such preferred stock dividends for the years ended December 31:

 

  2010  2009  2008 

Ordinary dividends

 $1.703170    92.3753%   $1.837828    99.6788%   $1.843750    100.0000%  

Qualified dividends

  0.140580    7.6247%    -    -    -    -  

Capital gain

  -    -    0.003750    0.2034%    -    -  

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

  -    -    0.002172    0.1178%    -    -  
                        
 $    1.843750    100.0000%   $    1.843750    100.0000%   $    1.843750    100.0000%  
                        

 

37


Table of Contents

Capital Resources

Generally, cash needs for property acquisitions, mortgages and notes receivable investments, debt payments, dividends, capital expenditures, development and other investments have been funded by equity and debt offerings, bank borrowings, the sale of properties and, to a lesser extent, by internally generated funds. Cash needs for other items have been met from operations. If available, future sources of capital include proceeds from the public or private offering of NNN’s debt or equity securities, secured or unsecured borrowings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from the sale of properties, as well as undistributed funds from operations.

Debt

The following is a summary of NNN’s total outstanding debt as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010   Percentage of
Total
   2009   Percentage of
Total
 

Line of credit payable

  $161,000     14.2%    $-     -  

Mortgages payable

   24,269     2.2%     25,290     2.6%  

Notes payable – convertible

   349,534     30.8%     343,380     34.8%  

Notes payable

   598,882     52.8%     618,676     62.6%  
                    

Total outstanding debt

  $        1,133,685             100.0%    $        987,346             100.0%  
                    

Indebtedness.  NNN expects to use indebtedness primarily for property acquisitions and development of single-tenant retail properties, either directly or through investment interests, and mortgages and notes receivable.

Line of Credit Payable.    NNN’s $400,000,000 revolving Credit Facility had a weighted average outstanding balance of $17,861,000 and a weighted average interest rate of 3.8% during the year ended December 31, 2010. In November 2009, NNN entered into a credit agreement for a new $400,000,000 credit facility, replacing the former revolving credit facility (as the context requires, the previous and new revolving credit facility, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures November 2012, with an option to extend maturity to November 2013. The Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 280 basis points with a 1.0% LIBOR floor; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN’s debt credit rating. The Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature for NNN to increase, at its option, the facility size up to $500,000,000. As of December 31, 2010, $161,000,000 was outstanding, and $239,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $647,000.

In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage, and (iv) investment limitations. At December 31, 2010, NNN was in compliance with those covenants. In the event that NNN violates any of these restrictive financial covenants, it could cause the indebtedness under the Credit Facility to be accelerated and may impair NNN’s access to the debt and equity markets and limit NNN’s ability to pay dividends to its common and preferred stockholders, each of which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

38


Table of Contents

Mortgages Payable.    The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):

 

Entered

  Balance   Interest
Rate
  Maturity(3)   Carrying
Value of
Encumbered
Asset(s)(1)
   Outstanding Principal
Balance at December 31,
 
         2010   2009 

December 2001(2)

   623     9.00  April 2014    $734    $215    $267  

December 2001(2)

   698     9.00  April 2019     1,186     364     392  

December 2001(2)

   485     9.00  April 2019     1,152     187     201  

June 2002

       21,000     6.90  July 2012     24,051     18,841     19,170  

February 2004(2)

   6,952     6.90  January 2017     11,522     4,038     4,554  

March 2005(2)

   1,015     8.14  September 2016     1,322     624     706  
                    
       $        39,967    $        24,269    $        25,290  
                    

 

 (1)

Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of NNN’s properties. The carrying values of the assets are as of December 31, 2010.

 (2)

Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan. The corresponding original principal balance represents the outstanding principal balance at the time of acquisition.

 (3)

Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.

Notes Payable – Convertible.  Each of NNN’s outstanding series of convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands, except conversion price):

 

Terms

  2026
Notes(1)(2)(4)
  2028
Notes(2)(5)(6)
 

Issue Date

   September 2006    March 2008  

Net Proceeds

  $168,650   $228,576  

Stated Interest Rate(8)

   3.950%    5.125%  

Debt Issuance Costs

  $3,850(3)  $5,459(7) 

Earliest Conversion Date

           September 2025            June 2027  

Earliest Put Option Date

   September 2011    June 2013  

Maturity Date

   September 2026    June 2028  

Original Principal

  $172,500   $234,035  

Repurchases

   (33,800  (11,000
         

Outstanding principal balance at December 31, 2010

  $138,700   $223,035  
         

 

 (1)

NNN repurchased $8,800 and $25,000 in 2009 and 2008, respectively, for a purchase price of $6,994 and $19,188, respectively, resulting in a gain of $1,565 and $4,961, respectively.

 (2)

Debt issuance costs include underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the period to the earliest put option date of the holders using the effective interest method.

 (3)

Includes $463 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $33,800 of the 2026 Notes.

 (4)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 41.9803 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $23.8207 per share of common stock.

 (5)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 39.3620 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $25.4052 per share of common stock.

 (6)

NNN repurchased $11,000 in 2009 for a purchase price of $8,588 resulting in a gain of $1,867.

 (7)

Includes $219 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $11,000 of the 2028 Notes, respectively.

 (8)

With the adoption of the new accounting guidance on convertible debt securities, the effective interest rate for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes are 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively.

Each series of convertible notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of the Company. Each note is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through but not including the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

 

39


Table of Contents

The carrying amounts of the Company’s debt and equity balances are summarized in the table below as of December 31, (dollars in thousands):

 

    2010  2009 

Carrying value of equity component

  $(33,873 $(33,873

Principal amount of convertible debt

   361,735    361,735  

Remaining unamortized debt discount

   (12,201  (18,355
         

Net carrying value of convertible debt

  $315,661   $309,507  
         

As of December 31, 2010, the remaining amortization periods for the debt discount were approximately nine months and 18 months for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes, respectively.

The adjusted effective interest rates for the liability components of the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes were 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively. The Company recorded noncash interest-related charges of $6,154,000, $5,809,000 and $5,481,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company recorded contractual interest expense of $16,909,000, $17,046,000 and $16,548,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, relating to the 2026 Notes and 2028 Notes.

The if-converted values that exceed the principal amount as of December 31, 2010, are $15,601,000 and $9,611,000 for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, the if-converted amount did not exceed the value of the principal amount.

Notes Payable.  Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

 

    Notes    

  Issue Date  Principal   Discount(3)   Net
Price
   Stated
Rate
   Effective
Rate(4)
   Maturity
Date

2012(1)

  June 2002  $50,000     287    $49,713     7.750%     7.833%    June 2012

2014(1)(2)(5)

  June 2004   150,000     440     149,560     6.250%     5.910%    June 2014

2015(1)

  November 2005   150,000     390     149,610     6.150%     6.185%    December 2015

2017(1)(6)

  September 2007   250,000     877     249,123     6.875%     6.924%    October 2017

 

 (1)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility.

 (2)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to repay the obligation of the 2004 Notes.

 (3)

The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.

 (4)

Includes the effects of the discount, treasury lock gain and swap gain (as applicable).

 (5)

NNN entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement which fixed a swap rate of 4.61% on a notional amount of $94,000. Upon issuance of the 2014 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting interest rate swap agreement resulting in a gain of $4,148. The gain has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2014 Notes using the effective interest method.

 (6)

NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of $3,260, of which $3,228 was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.

Each series of notes represent senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. The notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date, and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

In connection with the note and convertible note offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling $5,226,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.

In accordance with the terms of the indentures, pursuant to which NNN’s notes and convertible notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios, and (ii) certain interest coverage. At December 31, 2010, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

 

40


Table of Contents

NNN’s failure to comply with certain of its debt covenants could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under such debt and limit the dividends paid to NNN’s common and preferred stockholders which would likely have a material adverse impact on NNN’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these defaults could impair its access to the debt and equity markets.

In September 2010, NNN repaid the 8.500% $20,000,000 notes that were due in September 2010.

Debt and Equity Securities

NNN has used, and expects to use in the future, issuances of debt and equity securities primarily to pay down its outstanding indebtedness and to finance investment acquisitions. NNN has maintained investment grade debt ratings from Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s Investor Service and Fitch Ratings on its senior, unsecured debt since 1998. In June 2008, NNN’s debt rating was upgraded by Moody’s Investor Service. In February 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) which was automatically effective and permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities.

A description of NNN’s outstanding series of publicly held notes is found under “Debt – Notes Payable – Convertible” and “Debt – Notes Payable” above.

7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.  In October 2006, NNN issued 3,680,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and received gross proceeds of $92,000,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs of approximately $3,098,000, consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

Holders of the depositary shares are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 7.375% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per depositary share per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $1.84375 per depositary share). The Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares ranks senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. NNN may redeem the Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares on or after October 12, 2011, for cash, at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends.

Common Stock Issuances.  In October 2008, NNN issued 3,450,000 shares of common stock in a registered, underwritten public offering at a price of $23.05 per share and received net proceeds of $75,958,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $3,565,000 consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, legal and accounting fees. NNN used the net proceeds to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility and to acquire Investment Properties.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.  In June 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement which was automatically effective, with the Commission for its DRIP, which permits the issuance by NNN of 16,000,000 shares of common stock. NNN’s DRIP provides an economical and convenient way for current stockholders and other interested new investors to invest in NNN’s common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to NNN’s DRIP for each of the years ended December 31:

 

    2010   2009   2008 

Shares of common stock

   793,759     3,766,452     2,146,640  

Net proceeds

  $17,623,000    $67,354,000    $47,372,000  

The proceeds from the issuances were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness under NNN’s Credit Facility.

 

41


Table of Contents

Mortgages and Notes Receivable.

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

    2010  2009 

Mortgages and notes receivable

  $29,750   $41,707  

Accrued interest receivable, net of reserves

   644    269  

Unamortized discount

   (63  -  
         
  $30,331   $41,976  
         

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests.

In connection with the independent valuations of the Residuals’ fair value, NNN adjusted the carrying value of the Residuals to reflect such fair value as of December 31, 2010. Due to changes in market conditions relating to residual assets, the independent valuation changed several valuation assumptions. The following table summarizes the changes to the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of December 31:

 

    2010   2009 

Discount rate

   25%     25%  

Average life equivalent CPR speeds range

   4.35% to 20.37% CPR     14.5% to 20.7% CPR  

Foreclosures:

    

Frequency curve default model

   0.1% - 15.0% range     6% average rate  

Loss severity of loans in foreclosure

   20%     20%  

Yield:

    

LIBOR

   Forward 3-month curve     Forward 3-month curve  

Prime

   Forward curve     Forward curve  

The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

    2010   2009   2008 

Unrealized gains

  $1,273    $-    $2,009  

Unrealized losses

   -     1,640     -  

Other than temporary valuation impairment

   3,995     498     758  

Business Combination.

In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of its tenants, in June 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties. The note foreclosure resulted in a loss of $7,816,000. NNN recorded the value of the assets received at fair value. No liabilities were assumed. The fair value of the assets resulted in goodwill of $3,400,000. In connection with the review of goodwill for impairment, NNN recognized a noncash impairment charge of $1,900,000.

 

42


Table of Contents

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

NNN is exposed to interest rate risk primarily as a result of its variable rate Credit Facility and its fixed rate debt which is used to finance NNN’s development and acquisition activities, as well as for general corporate purposes. NNN’s interest rate risk management objective is to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower its overall borrowing costs. To achieve its objectives, NNN borrows at both fixed and variable rates on its long-term debt. As of December 31, 2010, NNN had no outstanding derivatives.

The information in the table below summarizes NNN’s market risks associated with its debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2010 and 2009. The table presents principal payments and related interest rates by year for debt obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2010. The variable interest rates shown represent weighted average rate for the Credit Facility for the year ended December 31, 2010. The table incorporates only those debt obligations that existed as of December 31, 2010, and it does not consider those debt obligations or positions which could arise after this date. Moreover, because firm commitments are not presented in the table below, the information presented therein has limited predictive value. As a result, NNN’s ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period, NNN’s hedging strategies at that time and interest rates. If interest rates on NNN’s variable rate debt increased by one percent, NNN’s interest expense would have increased by less than one percent for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Debt Obligations (dollars in thousands)

 
   Variable Rate Debt  Fixed Rate Debt 
   Credit Facility  Mortgages  Unsecured Debt(1) 
   Debt
Obligation
  Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
  Debt
Obligation
  Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
  Debt
Obligation
  Effective
Interest
Rate
 

2011

  $              -    -    $    1,098    7.20%    $   136,857    5.84%  

2012

  161,000    3.80%    19,290    6.92%    49,945    7.83%  

2013

  -    -    863    7.35%    212,677    7.19%  

2014

  -    -    881    7.27%    149,817    5.91%  

2015

  -    -    917    7.22%    149,777    6.19%  

Thereafter

  -    -    1,220    7.47%    249,343    6.92%  
               

Total

  $  161,000    3.80%    $  24,269    7.00%    $   948,416    6.60%  
               

Fair Value:

      

December 31, 2010

  $  161,000     $  24,269     $1,044,621   
               

December 31, 2009

  $              -     $  25,290     $   987,275   
               

(1)     Includes NNN’s notes payable and convertible notes payable, each net of unamortized discounts. NNN uses Bloomberg to determine the fair value.

         

NNN is also exposed to market risks related to NNN’s Residuals. Factors that may impact the market value of the Residuals include delinquencies, loan losses, prepayment speeds and interest rates. The Residuals, which are reported at market value based upon an independent valuation, had a carrying value of $15,915,000 and $20,153,000 as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Losses are considered other than temporary and reported as a valuation impairment in earnings from operations if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows that leads to a loss in value.

 

43


Table of Contents

Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and our report dated February 24, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, Florida

February 24, 2011

 

44


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of National Retail Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statements schedules, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), National Retail Property Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 24, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, Florida

February 24, 2011

 

45


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

ASSETS

  December 31,
2010
   December 31,
2009
 

Real estate, Investment Portfolio:

    

Accounted for using the operating method, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization

  $        2,519,950    $        2,328,576  

Accounted for using the direct financing method

   29,773     31,317  

Real estate, Inventory Portfolio, held for sale

   32,076     72,423  

Investment in unconsolidated affiliate

   4,515     4,703  

Mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable, net of allowance

   30,331     41,976  

Commercial mortgage residual interests

   15,915     20,153  

Cash and cash equivalents

   2,048     15,225  

Receivables, net of allowance of $1,750 and $583, respectively

   3,403     1,946  

Accrued rental income, net of allowance of $3,609 and $2,875, respectively

   25,535     25,745  

Debt costs, net of accumulated amortization of $11,198 and $6,870, respectively

   9,366     13,884  

Other assets

   40,663     35,014  
          

Total assets

  $2,713,575    $2,590,962  
          

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

    

Liabilities:

    

Line of credit payable

  $161,000    $-  

Mortgages payable

   24,269     25,290  

Notes payable – convertible, net of unamortized discount of $12,201 and $18,355, respectively

   349,534     343,380  

Notes payable, net of unamortized discount of $1,118 and $1,324, respectively

   598,882     618,676  

Accrued interest payable

   7,342     7,471  

Other liabilities

   43,774     29,283  
          

Total liabilities

   1,184,801     1,024,100  
          

Commitments and contingencies (Note 26)

    

Equity:

    

Stockholders’ equity:

    

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 15,000,000 shares

    

Series C, 3,680,000 depositary shares issued and outstanding, at stated liquidation value of $25 per share

   92,000     92,000  

Common stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 190,000,000 shares; 83,613,289 and 82,427,560 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

   838     825  

Excess stock, $0.01 par value. Authorized 205,000,000 shares; none issued or outstanding

   -     -  

Capital in excess of par value

   1,429,750     1,408,491  

Retained earnings

   3,234     62,413  

Accumulated other comprehensive income

   1,661     511  
          

Total stockholders’ equity of NNN

   1,527,483     1,564,240  

Noncontrolling interests

   1,291     2,622  
          

Total equity

   1,528,774     1,566,862  
          

Total liabilities and equity

  $2,713,575    $2,590,962  
          

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

46


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
    2010  2009  2008 

Revenues:

    

Rental income from operating leases

  $211,172   $209,256   $205,334  

Earned income from direct financing leases

   3,001    3,070    3,103  

Percentage rent

   959    1,340    1,104  

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

   7,438    8,361    6,980  

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

   3,026    4,535    5,807  

Interest income on commercial mortgage residual interests

   3,460    4,252    4,636  
             
   229,056    230,814    226,964  
             

Disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio:

    

Gross proceeds

   5,600    953    4,900  

Costs

   (4,959  (916  (4,879
             

Gain

   641    37    21  
             

Retail operations:

    

Revenues

   32,958    15,595    -  

Operating expenses

   (31,647  (15,176  -  
             

Net

   1,311    419    -  
             

Operating expenses:

    

General and administrative

   22,778    21,773    24,875  

Real estate

   13,534    13,642    10,152  

Depreciation and amortization

   48,328    46,539    43,668  

Impairment losses and other charges

   7,458    36,080    1,234  

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

   3,995    498    758  

Restructuring costs

   -    731    -  
             
   96,093    119,263    80,687  
             

Earnings from operations

   134,915    112,007    146,298  
             

Other expenses (revenues):

    

Interest and other income

   (1,513  (1,371  (3,748

Interest expense

   65,179    62,151    63,964  

Loss on interest rate hedge

   -    -    804  
             
   63,666    60,780    61,020  
             

Earnings from continuing operations before income tax benefit (expense), equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate and gain on extinguishment of debt

   71,249    51,227    85,278  

Income tax benefit (expense)

   (475  1,049    7,255  

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate

   428    421    364  

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   -    3,432    4,961  
             

Earnings from continuing operations

   71,202    56,129    97,858  

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations (Note 18):

    

Real estate, Investment Portfolio, net of income tax expense

   1,859    1,776    12,914  

Real estate, Inventory Portfolio, net of income tax expense

   292    (1,506  9,199  
             
   2,151    270    22,113  
             

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

47


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS – CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
    2010  2009  2008 

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

  $73,353   $56,399   $119,971  

Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests:

    

Continuing operations

   (367  (1,423  (96

Discontinued operations

   11    (166  (2,722
             
   (356  (1,589  (2,818
             

Net earnings attributable to NNN

   72,997    54,810    117,153  

Other comprehensive income (loss)

   1,150    (1,903  1,688  
             

Total comprehensive income

  $74,147   $52,907   $118,841  
             

Net earnings attributable to NNN

  $72,997   $54,810   $117,153  

Series C preferred stock dividends

   (6,785  (6,785  (6,785
             

Net earnings attributable to common stockholders

  $66,212   $48,025   $110,368  
             

Net earnings per share of common stock:

    

Basic:

    

Continuing operations

  $0.77   $0.60   $1.22  

Discontinued operations

   0.03    -    0.26  
             

Net earnings

  $0.80   $0.60   $1.48  
             

Diluted:

    

Continuing operations

  $0.77   $0.60   $1.22  

Discontinued operations

   0.03    -    0.26  
             

Net earnings

  $0.80   $0.60   $1.48  
             

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

    

Basic

   82,715,645    79,846,258    74,249,137  
             

Diluted

   82,849,362    79,953,499    74,344,231  
             

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

48


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Series C
Preferred
Stock
  Common
Stock
  Capital in
  Excess of  

Par Value
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
    Comprehensive  
Income
  Total
  Stockholders’  
Equity
    Noncontrolling  
Interests
  Total
Equity
 

Balances at December 31, 2007

 $        92,000   $        725   $        1,189,564   $        134,383   $                  975   $        1,417,647   $                  2,956   $        1,420,603  

Net earnings

  -    -    -    117,153    -    117,153    2,818    119,971  

Dividends declared and paid:

        

$1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

  -    -    -    (6,785  -    (6,785  -    (6,785

$1.48 per share of common stock

  -    4    8,472    (110,107  -    (101,631  -    (101,631

Issuance of common stock:

        

3,523,285 shares

  -    35    80,633    -    -    80,668    -    80,668  

1,753,201 shares – discounted stock purchase program

  -    18    38,878    -    -    38,896    -    38,896  

Issuance of 217,397 shares of restricted common stock

  -    2    (2  -    -    -    -    -  

Stock issuance costs

  -    -    (3,582  -    -    (3,582  -    (3,582

Equity component of convertible debt

  -    -    20,467    -    -    20,467    -    20,467  

Amortization of deferred compensation

  -    -    2,588    -    -    2,588    -    2,588  

Interest rate hedge termination

  -    -    -    -    (162  (162  -    (162

Amortization of interest rate hedges

  -    -    -    -    (109  (109  -    (109

Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests

  -    -    -    -    1,760    1,760    249    2,009  

Stock value adjustment

  -    -    -    -    (50  (50  -    (50

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

  -    -    -    -    -    -    41    41  

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

  -    -    -    -     -    (5,483  (5,483

Other

  -    -    -    -    -    -    1,505    1,505  
                                

Balances at December 31, 2008

 $92,000   $784   $1,337,018   $134,644   $2,414   $1,566,860   $2,086   $1,568,946  
                                

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

49


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY – CONTINUED

Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Series C
Preferred
Stock
  Common
Stock
  Capital in
  Excess of  

Par Value
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated
Other
    Comprehensive  
Income
  Total
  Stockholders’  
Equity
    Noncontrolling  
Interests
  Total
Equity
 

Balances at December 31, 2008

 $92,000   $784   $1,337,018   $134,644   $2,414   $1,566,860   $2,086   $1,568,946  

Net earnings

  -    -    -    54,810    -    54,810    1,589    56,399  

Dividends declared and paid:

        

$1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

  -    -    -    (6,785  -    (6,785  -    (6,785

$1.50 per share of common stock

  -    1    1,797    (120,256  -    (118,458  -    (118,458

Issuance of common stock:

        

99,738 shares

  -    1    1,435    -    -    1,436    -    1,436  

3,664,182 shares – discounted stock purchase program

  -    36    65,519    -    -    65,555    -    65,555  

Issuance of 262,546 shares of restricted common stock

  -    3    (3  -    -    -    -    -  

Stock issuance costs

  -    -    (113  -    -    (113  -    (113

Equity component of extinguishment of convertible debt

  -    -    (795  -    -    (795  -    (795

Amortization of deferred compensation

  -    -    3,443    -    -    3,443    -    3,443  

Amortization of interest rate hedges

  -    -    -    -    (159  (159  -    (159

Unrealized loss – commercial mortgage residual interests

  -    -    -    -    (1,744  (1,744  104    (1,640

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

  -    -    -    -    -    -    152    152  

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

  -    -    -    -    -    -    (552  (552

Other

  -    -    190    -    -    190    (757  (567
                                

Balances at December 31, 2009

 $        92,000   $        825   $        1,408,491   $        62,413   $                  511   $        1,564,240   $                  2,622   $        1,566,862  
                                

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

50


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY – CONTINUED

Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

   Series C
Preferred
Stock
  Common
Stock
  Capital in
  Excess of  

Par Value
  Retained
Earnings
  Accumulated Other
    Comprehensive  
Income
  Total
  Stockholders’  
Equity
    Noncontrolling  
Interests
  Total
Equity
 

Balances at December 31, 2009

 $92,000   $825   $1,408,491   $62,413   $511   $1,564,240   $2,622   $1,566,862  

Net earnings

  -    -    -    72,997    -    72,997    356    73,353  

Dividends declared and paid:

        

$1.84375 per depositary share of Series C preferred stock

  -    -    -    (6,785  -    (6,785  -    (6,785

$1.51 per share of common stock

  -    3    7,350    (125,391  -    (118,038  -    (118,038

Issuance of common stock:

      -     

39,872 shares

  -    1    697    -    -    698    -    698  

491,705 shares – discounted stock purchase program

  -    5    10,272    -    -    10,277    -    10,277  

Issuance of 377,164 shares of restricted common stock

  -    4    (4  -    -    -    -    -  

Stock issuance costs

  -    -    (1  -    -    (1  -    (1

Performance incentive plan

  -    -    (1,634  -    -    (1,634  -    (1,634

Amortization of deferred compensation

  -    -    5,119    -    -    5,119    -    5,119  

Amortization of interest rate hedges

  -    -    -    -    (165  (165  -    (165

Unrealized gain – commercial mortgage residual interests

  -    -    -    -    1,272    1,272    (26  1,246  

Contributions from noncontrolling interests

  -    -    -    -    -    -    43    43  

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

  -    -    -    -    -    -    (861  (861

Purchase of noncontrolling interest

  -    -    (404  -    -    (404  (1,199  (1,603

Other

  -    -    (136  -    43    (93  356    263  
                                

Balances at December 31, 2010

 $        92,000   $        838   $        1,429,750   $        3,234   $                        1,661   $        1,527,483   $                  1,291   $  1,528,774  
                                

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

51


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(dollars in thousands)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 

Cash flows from operating activities:

    

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

  $73,353   $56,399   $119,971  

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:

    

Performance incentive plan expense

   5,756    4,172    3,299  

Stock options expense – tax effect

   122    190    -  

Depreciation and amortization

   49,084    48,485    45,347  

Impairment losses and other charges

   7,458    41,710    5,660  

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation

   3,995    498    758  

Amortization of notes payable discount

   6,360    6,006    5,670  

Amortization of deferred interest rate hedges

   (166  (159  (162

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   (428  (421  (364

Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates

   578    607    439  

Gain on disposition of real estate, Investment Portfolio

   (1,134  (2,392  (9,980

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   -    (3,432  (4,961

Gain on disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   (941  (595  (12,665

Deferred income taxes

   (2,544  (16,649  (5,593

Income tax valuation allowance

   3,121    14,900    -  

Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations:

    

Additions to real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   (478  (2,457  (33,745

Proceeds from disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   42,817    6,276    128,785  

Decrease in real estate leased to others using the direct financing method

   1,544    1,378    1,195  

Decrease (increase) in work in process

   (755  (786  47  

Increase in mortgages, notes and accrued interest receivable

   (467  (10  (217

Decrease (increase) in receivables

   (219  941    243  

Decrease (increase) in commercial mortgage residual interests

   1,516    (291  -  

Decrease (increase) in accrued rental income

   124    (2,061  (978

Decrease (increase) in other assets

   (53  (172  951  

Decrease in accrued interest payable

   (129  (137  (3,635

Decrease in other liabilities

   (431  (2,930  (1,463

Increase (decrease) in current tax liability

   (169  432    (1,143
             

Net cash provided by operating activities

   187,914    149,502    237,459  
             

Cash flows from investing activities:

    

Proceeds from the disposition of real estate, Investment Portfolio

   10,312    14,588    60,027  

Additions to real estate, Investment Portfolio:

    

Accounted for using the operating method

   (230,928  (44,433  (352,618

Investment in unconsolidated affiliate

   -    -    (901

Increase in mortgages and notes receivable

   (8,564  (959  (29,934

Principal payments on mortgages and notes receivable

   13,818    4,009    64,589  

Cash received from commercial mortgage residual interests

   -    -    3,591  

Payment of lease costs

   (1,324  (451  (922

Other

   (3,574  (817  (136
             

Net cash used in investing activities

   (220,260  (28,063  (256,304
             

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

52


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - CONTINUED

(dollars in thousands)

 

   Year Ended December 31, 
   2010  2009  2008 

Cash flows from financing activities:

    

Proceeds from line of credit payable

  $278,900   $132,400   $516,000  

Repayment of line of credit payable

   (117,900  (158,900  (619,300

Repayment of mortgages payable

   (6,453  (1,000  (1,190

Proceeds from notes payable – convertible

   -    -    234,035  

Repurchase of notes payable – convertible – debt component

   -    (14,785  (18,420

Repurchase of notes payable – convertible – equity component

   -    (795  (768

Repayment of notes payable – secured

   -    -    (12,000

Repayment of notes payable

   (20,000  -    (100,000

Payment of debt costs

   (75  (6,275  (5,813

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

   17,692    68,060    127,328  

Payment of Series C preferred stock dividends

   (6,785  (6,785  (6,785

Payment of common stock dividends

   (125,391  (120,256  (110,107

Noncontrolling interest distributions

   (861  (552  (5,483

Noncontrolling interest contributions

   43    152    41  

Stock issuance costs

   (1  (104  (3,566
             

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

   19,169    (108,840  (6,028
             

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

   (13,177  12,599    (24,873

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

   15,225    2,626    27,499  
             

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

  $2,048   $15,225   $2,626  
             

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

    

    Interest paid, net of amount capitalized

  $62,386   $61,475   $69,395  
             

    Taxes paid (received)

  $472   $(63 $3,441  
             

Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:

    

Issued 392,474, 262,546 and 225,517 shares of restricted and unrestricted common stock in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan

  $6,889   $4,290   $3,796  
             

Issued 10,092, 6,594 and 12,766 shares of common stock in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, to directors pursuant to NNN’s performance incentive plan

  $236   $118   $262  
             

Issued 25,066, 41,604 and 26,879 shares of common stock in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, pursuant to NNN’s Deferred Director Fee Plan

  $401   $611   $449  
             

Surrender of 2,520 shares of restricted common stock in 2008

  $-   $-   $58  
             

Change in other comprehensive income

  $1,150   $(1,903 $1,439  
             

Change in lease classification (direct financing lease to operating lease)

  $-   $-   $300  
             

Transfer of real estate from Inventory Portfolio to Investment Portfolio

  $-   $16,058   $29,948  
             

Note and mortgage receivable accepted in connection with real estate transactions

  $5,950   $1,550   $24,245  
             

Mortgages payable assumed in connection with real estate transactions

  $5,432   $-   $-  
             

Real estate acquired in connection with mortgage receivable foreclosure

  $6,250   $4,240   $2,497  
             

Assets received in note receivable foreclosure

  $-   $5,527   $-  
             

Note receivable foreclosures

  $-   $(17,013 $-  
             

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

53


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

and SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Years Ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008

Note 1 – Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

Organization and Nature of Business – National Retail Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, is a fully integrated real estate investment trust (“REIT”) formed in 1984. The term “NNN” or the “Company” refers to National Retail Properties, Inc. and all of its consolidated subsidiaries. NNN has elected to treat certain subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries. These taxable subsidiaries and their majority owned and controlled subsidiaries are collectively referred to as the “TRS.”

NNN’s operations are divided into two primary business segments: (i) investment assets, including real estate assets, mortgages and notes receivable and commercial mortgage residual interests (collectively, “Investment Assets”), and (ii) inventory real estate assets (“Inventory Assets”). NNN acquires, owns, invests in, manages and develops properties that are leased primarily to retail tenants under long-term net leases and primarily held for investment (“Investment Properties” or “Investment Portfolio”).

 

   December 31, 2010 

Investment Portfolio:

  

Total properties (including retail operations)

   1,195  

Gross leasable area (square feet)

   12,972,000  

States

   46  

The Inventory Assets typically represent direct and indirect investment interests in real estate assets acquired or developed primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate (“Inventory Properties” or “Inventory Portfolio”). As of December 31, 2010, NNN owned 17 Inventory Properties.

Principles of Consolidation – NNN’s consolidated financial statements include the accounts of each of the respective majority owned and controlled affiliates, including transactions whereby NNN has been determined to be the primary beneficiary in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance included in Consolidation. All significant intercompany account balances and transactions have been eliminated. NNN applies the equity method of accounting to investments in partnerships and joint ventures that are not subject to control by NNN due to the significance of rights held by other parties.

The TRS develops real estate through various joint venture development affiliate agreements. NNN consolidates the joint venture development entities listed in the table below based upon either NNN being the primary beneficiary of the respective variable interest entity or NNN having a controlling interest over the respective entity. NNN eliminates significant intercompany

 

54


Table of Contents

balances and transactions and records a noncontrolling interest for its other partners’ ownership percentage. The following table summarizes each of the investments as of December 31, 2010:

 

Date of Agreement

  

Entity Name

  TRS’
    Ownership  %    
 

November 2002

  WG Grand Prairie TX, LLC   60%  

February 2003

  Gator Pearson, LLC   50%  

February 2006

  CNLRS BEP, L.P.   50%  

September 2006

  NNN Harrison Crossing, L.P.   50%  

In September 2007, NNN entered into a joint venture, NNN Retail Properties Fund I LLC (the “NNN Crow JV”) with an affiliate of Crow Holdings Realty Partners IV, LP.

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – NNN records the acquisition of real estate at cost, including acquisition and closing costs. The cost of properties developed by NNN includes direct and indirect costs of construction, property taxes, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy.

Purchase Accounting for Acquisition of Real Estate Subject to a Lease – In accordance with the FASB guidance on business combinations, the fair value of the real estate acquired with in-place leases is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and tenant improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, value of in-place leases and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired leased property is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land, building and tenant improvements based on the determination of the fair values of these assets. The as-if-vacant fair value of a property is provided to management by a qualified appraiser.

In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-market in-place lease values are recorded as other assets or liabilities based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases, and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease, including the probability of renewal periods. The capitalized above-market lease values are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases unless the Company believes that it is likely that the tenant would renew the option whereby the Company would amortize the value attributable to the renewal over the renewal period. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the initial term.

The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, consisting of in-place leases, is measured by the excess of (i) the purchase price paid for a property after adjusting existing in-place leases to market rental rates over (ii) the estimated fair value of the property as-if-vacant, determined as set forth above. The value of in-place leases exclusive of the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods of the respective leases. If a lease were to be terminated prior to its stated expiration, all unamortized amounts relating to that lease would be written off.

The value of tenant relationships is reviewed on individual transactions to determine if future value was derived from the acquisition.

 

55


Table of Contents

Real estate is generally leased to tenants on a net lease basis, whereby the tenant is responsible for all operating expenses relating to the property, including property taxes, insurance, maintenance and repairs. The leases are accounted for using either the operating or the direct financing method. Such methods are described below:

Operating method – Leases accounted for using the operating method are recorded at the cost of the real estate. Revenue is recognized as rentals are earned and expenses (including depreciation) are charged to operations as incurred. Buildings are depreciated on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold interests are amortized on the straight-line method over the terms of their respective leases. When scheduled rentals vary during the lease term, income is recognized on a straight-line basis so as to produce a constant periodic rent over the term of the lease. Accrued rental income is the aggregate difference between the scheduled rents which vary during the lease term and the income recognized on a straight-line basis.

Direct financing method – Leases accounted for using the direct financing method are recorded at their net investment (which at the inception of the lease generally represents the cost of the property). Unearned income is deferred and amortized into income over the lease terms so as to produce a constant periodic rate of return on NNN’s net investment in the leases.

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio – The TRS acquires and/or develops and owns properties primarily for the purpose of selling the real estate. The properties that are classified as held for sale at any given time may consist of properties that have been acquired in the marketplace with the intent to sell and properties that have been, or are currently being, constructed by the TRS. The TRS records the acquisition of the real estate at cost, including the acquisition and closing costs. The cost of the real estate developed by the TRS includes direct and indirect costs of construction, interest and other miscellaneous costs incurred during the development period until the project is substantially complete and available for occupancy. Real estate held for sale is not depreciated and is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. In accordance with the FASB guidance included in Real Estate, the TRS classifies its real estate held for sale as discontinued operations for each property in which rental revenues are generated.

Impairment – Real Estate – Based upon events or changes in certain circumstances, management periodically assesses its Investment Properties for possible impairment indicating that the carrying value of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market condition and the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are currently vacant or become vacant. Management determines whether an impairment in value has occurred by comparing the estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), including the residual value of the real estate, with the carrying cost of the individual asset. If an impairment is indicated, a loss will be recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value.

Real Estate Dispositions – When real estate is disposed of, the related cost, accumulated depreciation or amortization and any accrued rental income for operating leases and the net investment for direct financing leases are removed from the accounts and gains and losses from the dispositions are reflected in income. Gains from the disposition of real estate are generally recognized using the full accrual method in accordance with the FASB guidance included in Real Estate Sales, provided that various criteria relating to the terms of the sale and any subsequent involvement by NNN with the real estate sold are met. Lease termination fees are recognized when the related leases are cancelled and NNN no longer has a continuing obligation to provide services to the former tenants.

 

56


Table of Contents

Valuation of Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest – The allowance related to the mortgages, notes and accrued interest is NNN’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses. The allowance is determined on an individual note basis in reviewing any payment past due for over 90 days. Any outstanding amounts are written off against the allowance when all possible means of collection have been exhausted.

Investment in an Unconsolidated Affiliate – NNN accounts for its investment in an unconsolidated affiliate under the equity method of accounting.

Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests, at Fair Value – Commercial mortgage residual interests, classified as available for sale, are reported at their market values with unrealized gains and losses reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. The commercial mortgage residual interests were acquired in connection with the acquisition of Orange Avenue Mortgage Investments, Inc. (“OAMI”). NNN recognizes the excess of all cash flows attributable to the commercial mortgage residual interests estimated at the acquisition/transaction date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. Losses are considered other than temporary valuation impairments if and when there has been a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows, exclusive of changes in interest rates, that leads to a loss in value.

In 2010, NNN acquired the 21.1% non-controlling interest in its majority owned and controlled subsidiary, OAMI, for $1,603,000, pursuant to which OAMI became a wholly owned subsidiary of NNN. NNN accounted for the transaction as an equity transaction in accordance with the FASB guidance on consolidation.

Cash and Cash Equivalents – NNN considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and money market accounts. Cash equivalents are stated at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value.

Cash accounts maintained on behalf of NNN in demand deposits at commercial banks and money market funds may exceed federally insured levels; however, NNN has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Valuation of Receivables – NNN estimates of the collectibility of its accounts receivable related to rents, expense reimbursements and other revenues. NNN analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debt levels, customer credit-worthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, tenants in bankruptcy are analyzed and estimates are made in connection with the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims.

Goodwill – Goodwill arises from business combinations and represents the excess of the cost of an acquired entity over the net fair value amounts that were assigned to the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. In accordance with the FASB guidance included in Goodwill, NNN performs impairment testing on goodwill by comparing fair value to carrying amount annually.

Debt Costs – Debt costs incurred in connection with NNN’s $400,000,000 line of credit and mortgages payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective loan commitment using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method. Debt costs incurred in connection with the issuance of NNN’s notes payable have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective debt obligation using the effective interest method.

 

57


Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition – Rental revenues for non-development real estate assets are recognized when earned in accordance with the FASB guidance included in Leases, based on the terms of the lease at the time of acquisition of the leased asset. Rental revenues for properties under construction commence upon completion of construction of the leased asset and delivery of the leased asset to the tenant.

Earnings Per Share – Earnings per share have been computed pursuant to the FASB guidance included in Earnings Per Share. Effective January 1, 2009, the guidance requires classification of the Company’s unvested restricted share units which contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends, as participating securities requiring the two-class method of computing earnings per share. Under the two-class method, earnings per common share are computed by dividing the sum of distributed earnings to common stockholders and undistributed earnings allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In applying the two-class method, undistributed earnings are allocated to both common shares and participating securities based on the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. The following table is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share using the two-class method for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009  2008 

Basic and Diluted Earnings:

    

Net earnings attributable to NNN

  $72,997   $54,810   $117,153  

Less: Series C preferred stock dividends

   (6,785  (6,785  (6,785
             

Net earnings available to NNN’s common stockholders

   66,212    48,025    110,368  

Less: Earnings attributable to unvested restricted shares

   (299  (290  (485
             

Net earnings used in basic earnings per share

   65,913    47,735    109,883  

Reallocated undistributed income (loss)

   -    (1  -  
             

Net earnings used in diluted earnings per share

  $65,913   $47,734   $109,883  
             

Basic and Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:

    

Weighted average number of shares outstanding

   83,320,921    80,486,215    74,732,844  

Less: Unvested restricted stock

   (605,276  (639,957  (483,707
             

Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share

   82,715,645    79,846,258    74,249,137  

Effects of dilutive securities:

    

Common stock options

   3,814    9,037    35,900  

Directors’ deferred fee plan

   129,903    98,204    59,194  
             

Weighted average number of shares outstanding used in diluted earnings per share

   82,849,362    79,953,499    74,344,231  
             

The potential dilutive shares related to convertible notes payable were not included in computing earnings per common share because their effects would be antidilutive.

Stock-Based Compensation – On January 1, 2006, NNN adopted the FASB guidance included in Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees, under the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, compensation cost is recognized for all awards granted after the adoption of this standard and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that are outstanding as of that date. In accordance with the FASB guidance, NNN estimates the fair value of restricted stock and stock option grants at the date of grant and amortizes those amounts into expense on a straight line basis or amount vested, if greater, over the appropriate vesting period.

Income Taxes – NNN has made an election to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and related regulations. NNN generally will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders,

 

58


Table of Contents

providing it distributes 100 percent of its REIT taxable income and meets certain other requirements for qualifying as a REIT. For each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, NNN believes it has qualified as a REIT. Notwithstanding NNN’s qualification for taxation as a REIT, NNN is subject to certain state taxes on its income and real estate.

NNN and its taxable REIT subsidiaries have made timely TRS elections pursuant to the provisions of the REIT Modernization Act. A taxable REIT subsidiary is able to engage in activities resulting in income that previously would have been disqualified from being eligible REIT income under the federal income tax regulations. As a result, certain activities of NNN which occur within its TRS entities are subject to federal and state income taxes (See Note 17). All provisions for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are attributable to NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries and to OAMI’s built-in-gain tax liability.

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method as required by the FASB guidance included in Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the temporary differences based on estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Fair Value Measurement – NNN’s estimates of fair value of financial and non-financial assets and liabilities based on the framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The framework specifies a hierarchy of valuation inputs which was established to increase consistency, clarity and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The guidance describes a fair value hierarchy based upon three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, two of which are considered observable and one that is considered unobservable. The following describes the three levels:

 

  

Level 1 – Valuation is based upon quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

  

Level 2 – Valuation is based upon inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

 

  

Level 3 – Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

New Accounting Pronouncements – In June 2009, FASB issued revised guidance on the accounting for variable interest entities. The revised guidance reflects the elimination of the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity. The guidance also replaces the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation of the previous guidance for determining which company, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach that is primarily qualitative. The new guidance requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity as well as additional disclosures. The guidance is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009.

 

59


Table of Contents

The adoption of the standard did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update requires new disclosures for transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2, as well as disclosure about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for Level 1 and 2. In addition, activity in Level 3 should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis (rather than as one net number). A reporting entity should provide fair value measurements disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities. The new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the standard did not have a significant impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

In February 2010, the FASB issued Subsequent Events, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. An entity that files Exchange Act reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is required to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued. An entity that is an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change alleviates potential conflicts between Subtopic 855-10 and requirements of the Commission. The scope of the reissuance disclosure requirements is refined to include revised financial statements only. Revised financial statements include financial statements revised either as a result of correction of an error or retrospective application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. All of the amendments in this are effective upon issuance of the final update, except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. The adoption of the standard did not have an impact on NNN’s financial position or results of operations.

Use of Estimates – Management of NNN has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant estimates include provision for impairment and allowances for certain assets, accruals, useful lives of assets and capitalization of costs. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassification – Certain items in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.

Note 2 – Real Estate – Investment Portfolio:

Leases – The following outlines key information for NNN’s Investment Property leases at December 31, 2010:

 

Lease classification:

  

Operating

   1,159  

Direct financing

   16  

Building portion – direct financing / land portion – operating

   7  

Weighted average remaining lease term

   12 Years  

The leases generally provide for limited increases in rent as a result of fixed increases, increases in the consumer price index, and/or increases in the tenant’s sales volume. Generally, the tenant is also required to pay all property taxes and assessments, substantially maintain the interior and exterior of the building and carry property and liability insurance coverage. Certain of NNN’s

 

60


Table of Contents

Investment Properties are subject to leases under which NNN retains responsibility for certain costs and expenses of the property. Generally, the leases of the Investment Properties provide the tenant with one or more multi-year renewal options subject to generally the same terms and conditions, including rent increases, consistent with the initial lease term.

Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Operating Method – Real estate subject to operating leases consisted of the following as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009 

Land and improvements

  $1,122,243   $1,054,889  

Buildings and improvements

   1,592,752    1,450,348  

Leasehold interests

   1,290    1,290  
         
   2,716,285    2,506,527  

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

   (222,921  (183,948
         
   2,493,364    2,322,579  

Work in progress

   26,586    5,997  
         
  $2,519,950   $2,328,576  
         

Some leases provide for scheduled rent increases throughout the lease term. Such amounts are recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases. For the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, NNN recognized collectively in continuing and discontinued operations, $(93,000), $2,102,000 and $1,020,000, respectively, of such income, net of reserves. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the balance of accrued rental income, net of allowances of $3,609,000 and $2,875,000, respectively, was $25,535,000 and $25,745,000, respectively.

As of December 31, 2010, in connection with the development of Investment Properties, NNN has the following funding commitments (dollars in thousands):

 

   # of
Properties
   Total
Commitment
(1)
   Amount
Funded
   Remaining
Commitment
 

Investment Portfolio

   28    $    68,746    $    50,196    $    18,550  
                    

(1)     Includes land and construction costs.

         

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on noncancellable operating leases at December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

 

2011

  $ 225,328  

2012

   222,547  

2013

   214,526  

2014

   204,970  

2015

   196,748  

Thereafter

   1,641,387  
     
  $    2,705,506  
     

Since lease renewal periods are exercisable at the option of the tenant, the above table only presents future minimum lease payments due during the initial lease terms. In addition, this table does not include amounts for potential variable rent increases that are based on the CPI or future contingent rents which may be received on the leases based on a percentage of the tenant’s gross sales.

 

61


Table of Contents

Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Direct Financing Method – The following lists the components of net investment in direct financing leases at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009 

Minimum lease payments to be received

  $37,699   $42,244  

Estimated unguaranteed residual values

   12,297    12,297  

Less unearned income

   (20,223  (23,224
         

Net investment in direct financing leases

  $    29,773   $    31,317  
         

The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments to be received on direct financing leases held for investment at December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

 

2011

  $ 4,531  

2012

   4,558  

2013

   4,508  

2014

   3,750  

2015

   3,457  

Thereafter

   16,895  
     
  $    37,699  
     

The above table does not include future minimum lease payments for renewal periods, potential variable CPI rent increases or contingent rental payments that may become due in future periods (see Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – Accounted for Using the Operating Method).

Note 3 – Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio:

As of December 31, 2010, the TRS owned 17 Inventory Properties: 10 completed inventory and seven land parcels. As of December 31, 2009, the TRS owned 19 Inventory Properties: 13 completed inventory and six land parcels. The real estate Inventory Portfolio consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009 

Inventory:

   

Land

  $19,734   $37,088  

Building

   18,487    47,684  
         
   38,221    84,772  

Less impairment

   (6,145  (12,349
         
  $    32,076   $    72,423  
         

 

62


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the number of Inventory Properties sold and the corresponding gain recognized on the disposition of Inventory Properties included in continuing and discontinued operations for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009  2008 
   # of
Properties
   Gain  # of
Properties
   Gain  # of
Properties
   Gain 

Continuing operations

   2    $641    2    $37    1    $21  

Noncontrolling interest

     (320    (14    (10
                   

Total continuing operations attributable to NNN

     321      23      11  
                   

Discontinued operations

   2     300    2     558    24     12,644  

Noncontrolling interest

     (43    -      (3,297
                   

Total discontinued operations attributable to NNN

     257      558      9,347  
                            
   4    $    578    4    $    581    25    $    9,358  
                            

Note 4 – Impairments – Real Estate:

Management periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions and the ability of NNN to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. As a result of the Company’s review of long lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets, NNN recognized the following real estate impairments for the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010   2009   2008 

Continuing operations

  $-    $28,884    $1,234  

Discontinued operations

   -     5,630     4,426  
               
  $            -    $    34,514    $    5,660  
               

The valuation of impaired assets is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis, income capitalization, analysis of recent comparable sales transactions, actual sales negotiations and bona fide purchase offers received from third parties. NNN may consider a single valuation technique or multiple valuation techniques, as appropriate, when measuring the fair value of its real estate.

Note 5 – Business Combinations:

In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of its tenants, in June 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on 12 Investment Properties. The note foreclosure resulted in a loss of $7,816,000. NNN recorded the value of the assets received at fair value. No liabilities were assumed. The fair value of the assets resulted in goodwill of $3,400,000. In connection with the annual review of goodwill for impairment, NNN recognized a noncash impairment charge of $1,900,000 included in Impairment losses and other charges in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings during the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

63


Table of Contents

Note 6 – Mortgages, Notes and Accrued Interest Receivable:

Mortgages are secured by real estate, real estate securities or other assets. Structured finance investments are secured by the borrowers’ pledge of their respective membership interests in the entities which own the respective real estate. Mortgages and notes receivable consisted of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009 

Mortgages and notes receivable

  $29,750   $41,707  

Accrued interest receivables, net of reserves

   644    269  

Unamortized discount

   (63  -  
         
  $    30,331   $    41,976  
         

In connection with the evaluation of the collectibility of its mortgages and notes receivable, during the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN recorded a valuation reserve of $5,625,000.

Note 7 – Commercial Mortgage Residual Interests:

OAMI holds the commercial mortgage residual interests (“Residuals”) from seven securitizations. The following table summarizes the investment interests in each of the transactions:

 

   Investment Interest 

Securitization

  Company (1)   OAMI (2)   3rd Party 

BYL 99-1

   -     59.0%     41.0%  

CCMH I, LLC

   42.7%     57.3%     -  

CCMH II, LLC

   44.0%     56.0%     -  

CCMH III, LLC

   36.7%     63.3%     -  

CCMH IV, LLC

   38.3%     61.7%     -  

CCMH V, LLC

   38.4%     61.6%     -  

CCMH VI, LLC

   -     100.0%     -  

(1)     NNN owned these investment interests prior to its acquisition of the equity interest in OAMI.

(2)     Effective July 1, 2010, NNN owns 100 percent of OAMI’s investment interest.

         

         

Each of the Residuals is recorded at fair value based upon an independent valuation. Unrealized gains and losses are reported as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity and other than temporary losses as a result of a change in the timing or amount of estimated cash flows are recorded as an other than temporary valuation impairment. Due to changes in market conditions relating to residual assets, the independent valuation adjusted several valuation assumptions related to prepayment speeds and default curves during 2010.

The following table summarizes the recognition of unrealized gains and/or losses recorded as other comprehensive income as well as other than temporary valuation impairment as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010   2009   2008 

Unrealized gains

  $    1,272    $        -    $    2,009  

Unrealized losses

   -         1,640     -  

Other than temporary valuation impairment

   3,995     498     758  

 

64


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the changes to the key assumptions used in determining the value of the Residuals as of December 31:

 

   2010   2009 

Discount rate

   25%     25%  

Average life equivalent CPR speeds range

   4.35% to 20.37% CPR     14.5% to 20.7% CPR  

Foreclosures:

    

    Frequency curve default model

   0.1% - 15.0% range     6% average rate  

    Loss severity of loans in foreclosure

   20%     20%  

Yield:

    

    LIBOR

   Forward 3-month curve     Forward 3-month curve  

    Prime

   Forward curve     Forward curve  

The following table shows the effects on the key assumptions affecting the fair value of the Residuals at December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

 

   Residuals 

Carrying amount of retained interests

  $    15,915  

Discount rate assumption:

  

    Fair value at 27% discount rate

  $15,261  

    Fair value at 30% discount rate

  $14,357  

Prepayment speed assumption:

  

    Fair value of 1% increases above the CPR Index

  $15,910  

    Fair value of 2% increases above the CPR Index

  $15,909  

Expected credit losses:

  

    Fair value 2% adverse change

  $15,658  

    Fair value 3% adverse change

  $15,503  

Yield Assumptions:

  

    Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 25 basis points

  $16,262  

    Fair value of Prime/LIBOR spread contracting 50 basis points

  $16,623  

These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on variations in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect of a variation of a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumptions; in reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

Note 8 – Line of Credit Payable:

NNN’s $400,000,000 revolving credit facility had a weighted average outstanding balance of $17,861,000 and a weighted average interest rate of 3.8% during the year ended December 31, 2010. In November 2009, NNN entered into a credit agreement for a new $400,000,000 revolving credit facility, replacing the existing revolving credit facility (as the context requires, the previous and new revolving credit facility, the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility matures November 2012, with an option to extend maturity to November 2013. The Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 280 basis points with a 1.0% LIBOR floor; however, such interest rate may change pursuant to a tiered interest rate structure based on NNN’s debt rating. The Credit Facility also includes an accordion feature for NNN to increase, at its option, the facility size up to $500,000,000. As of December 31, 2010, $161,000,000 was outstanding, and $239,000,000 was available for future borrowings under the Credit Facility, excluding undrawn letters of credit totaling $647,000.

 

65


Table of Contents

In accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants which, among other things, require NNN to maintain certain (i) maximum leverage ratios, (ii) debt service coverage, (iii) cash flow coverage and (iv) investment and dividend limitations. At December 31, 2010, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

Note 9 – Mortgages Payable:

The following table outlines the mortgages payable included in NNN’s consolidated financial statements (dollars in thousands):

 

Entered

  Initial
Balance
   Interest
Rate
   Maturity (3)   Carrying
Value of
Encumbered
Asset(s) (1)
   Outstanding Principal
Balance at December
 
          31, 2010   2009 

December 2001 (2)

  $623     9.00%     April 2014    $734    $215    $267  

December 2001 (2)

   698     9.00%     April 2019     1,186     364     392  

December 2001 (2)

   485     9.00%     April 2019     1,152     187     201  

June 2002

   21,000     6.90%     July 2012     24,051     18,841     19,170  

February 2004 (2)

   6,952     6.90%     January 2017     11,522     4,038     4,554  

March 2005 (2)

   1,015     8.14%     September 2016     1,322     624     706  
                     
        $    39,967    $    24,269    $    $25,290  
                     

 

 (1)

Each loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on certain of NNN’s properties. The carrying values of the assets are as of December 31, 2010.

 (2)

Date entered represents the date that NNN acquired real estate subject to a mortgage securing a loan. The corresponding original principal balance represents the outstanding principal balance at the time of acquisition.

 (3)

Monthly payments include interest and principal, if any; the balance is due at maturity.

The following is a schedule of the annual maturities of NNN’s mortgages payable at December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

 

2011

  $ 1,098  

2012

   19,290  

2013

   863  

2014

   881  

2015

   917  

Thereafter

   1,220  
     
  $24,269  
     

 

66


Table of Contents

Note 10 – Notes Payable – Convertible:

Each of NNN’s outstanding series of convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands, except conversion price):

 

Terms

  2026
Notes(1)(2)(4)
  2028
Notes(2)(5)(6)
 

Issue Date

   September 2006    March 2008  

Net Proceeds

  $168,650   $228,576  

Stated Interest Rate

   3.950%    5.125%  

Debt Issuance Costs

  $3,850(3)  $5,457(7) 

Earliest Conversion Date

   September 2025    June 2027  

Earliest Put Option Date

   September 2011    June 2013  

Maturity Date

   September 2026    June 2028  

Original Principal

  $172,500   $234,035  

Repurchases

   (33,800  (11,000
         

Outstanding principal balance at December 31, 2010

  $138,700   $223,035  
         

 

 (1)

NNN repurchased $8,800 and $25,000 in 2009 and 2008, respectively, for a purchase price of $6,994 and $19,188, respectively, resulting in a gain of $1,565 and $4,961, respectively.

 (2)

Debt issuance costs include underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. These costs have been deferred and are being amortized over the period to the earliest put option date of the holders using the effective interest method.

 (3)

Includes $463 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $33,800 of the 2026 Notes.

 (4)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 41.9803 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $23.8207 per share of common stock.

 (5)

The conversion rate per $1 principal amount was 39.3620 shares of NNN’s common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of $25.4052 per share of common stock.

 (6)

NNN repurchased $11,000 in 2009 for a purchase price of $8,588 resulting in a gain of $1,867.

 (7)

Includes $219 of note costs which were written off in connection with the repurchase of $11,000 of the 2028 Notes, respectively.

 (8)

With the adoption of the new accounting guidance on convertible debt securities, the effective interest rate for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes are 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively.

Each series of convertible notes represents senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of the Company. Each note is redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through but not including the redemption date and (ii) the make whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s debt and equity balances are summarized in the table below as of December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009 

Carrying value of equity component

  $(33,873 $(33,873

Principal amount of convertible debt

   361,735    361,735  

Remaining unamortized debt discount

   (12,201  (18,355
         

Net carrying value of convertible debt

  $    315,661   $    309,507  
         

As of December 31, 2010, the remaining amortization periods for the debt discount were approximately nine months and 18 months for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes, respectively.

The adjusted effective interest rates for the liability components of the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes were 5.840% and 7.192%, respectively. The Company recorded noncash interest charges of $6,154,000, $5,809,000 and $5,481,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company recorded contractual interest expense of $16,909,000,

 

67


Table of Contents

$17,046,000 and $16,548,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, relating to the 2026 Notes and 2028 Notes.

The if-converted values which exceed the principal amount as of December 31, 2010, are $15,601,000 and $9,611,000 for the 2026 Notes and the 2028 Notes, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, the if-converted amount did not exceed the value of the principal amount.

Note 11 – Notes Payable:

Each of NNN’s outstanding series of non-convertible notes are summarized in the table below (dollars in thousands):

 

Notes

  

Issue Date

  Principal   Discount(3)   Net
Price
   Stated
Rate
   Effective
Rate(4)
   

Maturity

Date

     

2012(1)

  June 2002  $    50,000    $            287    $    49,713     7.750%     7.833%    June 2012   

2014(1)(2)(5)

  June 2004   150,000     440     149,560     6.250%     5.910%    June 2014   

2015(1)

  November 2005   150,000     390     149,610     6.150%     6.185%    December 2015   

2017(1)(6)

  September 2007   250,000     877     249,123     6.875%     6.924%    October 2017   

 

 (1)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to pay down outstanding indebtedness of NNN’s Credit Facility.

 (2)

The proceeds from the note issuance were used to repay the obligation of the 2004 Notes.

 (3)

The note discounts are amortized to interest expense over the respective term of each debt obligation using the effective interest method.

 (4)

Includes the effects of the discount, treasury lock gain and swap gain (as applicable).

 (5)

NNN entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement which fixed a swap rate of 4.61% on a notional amount of $94,000. Upon issuance of the 2014 Notes, NNN terminated the forward starting interest rate swap agreement resulting in a gain of $4,148. The gain has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2014 Notes using the effective interest method.

 (6)

NNN entered into an interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000. Upon issuance of the 2017 Notes, NNN terminated the interest rate hedge agreement resulting in a liability of $3,260, of which $3,228 was recorded to other comprehensive income. The liability has been deferred and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the 2017 Notes using the effective interest method.

Each series of the notes represent senior, unsecured obligations of NNN and are subordinated to all secured indebtedness of NNN. Each of the notes are redeemable at the option of NNN, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) the principal amount of the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date and (ii) the make-whole amount, if any, as defined in the applicable supplemental indenture relating to the notes.

In connection with the debt offerings, NNN incurred debt issuance costs totaling $5,226,000 consisting primarily of underwriting discounts and commissions, legal and accounting fees, rating agency fees and printing expenses. Debt issuance costs for all note issuances have been deferred and are being amortized over the term of the respective notes using the effective interest method.

In September 2010, NNN repaid the $20,000,000 8.5% notes payable that were due in September 2010.

In accordance with the terms of the indenture, pursuant to which NNN’s notes have been issued, NNN is required to meet certain restrictive financial covenants, which, among other things, require NNN to maintain (i) certain leverage ratios and (ii) certain interest coverage. At December 31, 2010, NNN was in compliance with those covenants.

 

68


Table of Contents

Note 12 – Preferred Stock:

7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. In October 2006, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 3,680,000 depositary shares, each representing 1/100th of a share of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and received gross proceeds of $92,000,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs of approximately $3,098,000, consisting primarily of underwriting commissions and fees, legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

Holders of the depositary shares are entitled to receive, when and as authorized by the Board of Directors, cumulative preferential cash dividends at the rate of 7.375% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per depositary share per annum (equivalent to a fixed annual amount of $1.84375 per depositary share). The Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares ranks senior to NNN’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of NNN. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed. NNN may redeem the Series C Preferred Stock underlying the depositary shares on or after October 12, 2011, for cash, at a redemption price of $2,500.00 per share (or $25.00 per depositary share), plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends.

Note 13 – Common Stock:

In October 2008, NNN filed a prospectus supplement to the prospectus contained in its February 2006 shelf registration statement and issued 3,450,000 shares (including 450,000 shares in connection with the underwriters’ over allotment) of common stock at a price of $23.05 per share and received net proceeds of $75,958,000. In connection with this offering, NNN incurred stock issuance costs totaling approximately $3,565,000, consisting primarily of underwriters’ fees and commissions, and legal and accounting fees and printing expenses.

In February 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission which permits the issuance by NNN of an indeterminate amount of debt and equity securities.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan. In June 2009, NNN filed a shelf registration statement with the Commission for its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan (“DRIP”) which permits the issuance by NNN of 16,000,000 shares of common stock. The following outlines the common stock issuances pursuant to the DRIP for the years ended December 31:

 

   2010   2009   2008 

Shares of common stock

   793,759     3,766,452     2,146,640  

Net proceeds

  $    17,623,000    $    67,354,000    $    47,372,000  

Note 14 – Employee Benefit Plan:

Effective January 1, 1998, NNN adopted a defined contribution retirement plan (the “Retirement Plan”) covering substantially all of the employees of NNN. The Retirement Plan permits participants to defer up to a maximum of 60 percent of their compensation, as defined in the Retirement Plan, subject to limits established by the Code. NNN matches 60 percent of the participants’ contributions up to a maximum of eight percent of a participant’s annual compensation. NNN’s contributions to the Retirement Plan for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 totaled $297,000, $302,000 and $385,000, respectively.

 

69


Table of Contents

Note 15 – Dividends:

The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of common stock dividends paid to stockholders for the years ended December 31:

 

      2010          2009          2008     

Ordinary dividends

 $1.072446   $1.495182   $1.480000  

Qualified dividends

  0.081661    -    -  

Capital gain

  0.000861    0.003051    -  

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

  0.000498    0.001767    -  

Nontaxable distributions

  0.354534    -    -  
            
 $    1.510000   $    1.500000   $    1.480000  
            

During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, NNN declared and paid dividends to its common shareholders of $125,391,000, $120,256,000 and $110,107,000, respectively, or $1.51, $1.50 and $1.48 per share, respectively, of common stock.

On January 14, 2011, NNN declared a dividend of $0.38 per share, which is payable February 15, 2011 to its common stockholders of record as of January 31, 2011.

The following presents the characterization for tax purposes of preferred stock dividends per share paid to stockholders for the year ended December 31:

 

      2010          2009          2008     

Ordinary dividends

 $1.703170   $1.837828   $1.843750  

Qualified dividends

  0.140580    -    -  

Capital gain

  -    0.003750    -  

Unrecaptured Section 1250 Gain

  -    0.002172    -  
            
 $1.843750   $1.843750   $1.843750  
            

NNN declared and paid dividends to its Series C Preferred stockholders of $6,785,000 or $1.84375 per depository share during each of the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. The Series C Preferred Stock has no maturity date and will remain outstanding unless redeemed.

Note 16 – Restructuring Costs:

During the year ended December 31, 2009, NNN recorded restructuring costs of $731,000, related to the reduction of its workforce in January 2009.

Note 17 – Income Taxes:

NNN treats some depreciation expense and certain other items differently for tax than for financial reporting purposes. The principal differences between NNN’s effective tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, and the statutory rates relate to state taxes and nondeductible expenses.

For income tax purposes, NNN has taxable REIT subsidiaries in which certain real estate activities are conducted. In 2010, NNN acquired the 21.1% non-controlling interest in its majority owned and controlled subsidiary, OAMI, pursuant to which OAMI became a wholly owned subsidiary of NNN. OAMI has remaining tax liabilities relating to the built-in gain of its assets.

In June 2009, NNN incurred a new deferred income tax item as a result of NNN acquiring the operations of 12 auto service businesses. See Note 5 – Business Combinations. The new deferred tax item is goodwill. The amount of the tax deductible goodwill is approximately $11,216,000. It is

 

70


Table of Contents

amortized for tax purposes using a straight-line method, over 15 years, beginning with the month incurred.

The components of the net income tax asset consist of the following at December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009 

Temporary differences:

   

    Built-in gain

  $(4,068 $(4,731

    Depreciation

   (772  (385

    Cost basis

   256    1,796  

    Deferred income

   230    464  

    Other

   56    (268

    Reserves

   13,160    10,892  

    Goodwill

   3,239    2,801  

    Excess interest expense carryforward

   5,678    5,678  

    Net operating loss carryforward

   5,398    4,484  
         

Net deferred income tax asset

   23,177    20,731  

    Valuation allowance

   (18,021  (14,900
         

Total deferred income tax asset

  $5,156   $5,831  
         

In assessing the ability to realize a deferred tax asset, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. The net operating loss carryforwards were generated by NNN’s taxable REIT subsidiaries. The net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2027. Based upon the level of historical taxable income, projections for future taxable income, and tax strategies available to NNN over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes, with the exception of certain impairments and losses, it is more likely than not that NNN will realize all of the benefits of these deductible differences that existed as of December 31, 2010. NNN believes it is more likely than not that the benefit from certain impairment charges and losses will not be realized. In recognition of this risk, NNN has provided a valuation allowance of $18,021,000 on the deferred tax assets relating to the impairments and losses. The income tax benefit consists of the following components for the years ended December 31 (as adjusted) (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009  2008 

Net earnings before income taxes

  $    74,097   $    53,930   $    113,859  

Provision for income tax benefit (expense):

    

Current:

    

Federal

   (254  (419  (1,936

State and local

   (48  (79  (364

Deferred:

    

Federal

   (744  1,110    4,539  

State and local

   (54  268    1,055  
             

Total benefit (expense) for income taxes

   (1,100  880    3,294  
             

Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders

  $72,997   $54,810   $117,153  
             

In June 2006, the FASB issued additional guidance, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in a company’s financial statements included in Income Taxes. The interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax

 

71


Table of Contents

return. The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

NNN, in accordance with FASB guidance included in Income Taxes, has analyzed its various federal and state filing positions. NNN believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions are well documented and supported. Additionally, NNN believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate. Therefore, no reserves for uncertain income tax positions have been recorded pursuant to the FASB guidance. In addition, NNN did not record a cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of the FASB guidance.

NNN has had no increases or decreases in unrecognized tax benefits for current or prior years since the date of adoption. Further, no interest or penalties have been included since no reserves were recorded and no significant increases or decreases are expected to occur within the next 12 months. When applicable, such interest and penalties will be recorded in non-operating expenses. The periods that remain open under federal statute are 2007 through 2010. NNN also files in many states with varying open years under statute.

Note 18 – Earnings from Discontinued Operations:

Real Estate – Investment Portfolio – NNN classified the revenues and expenses related to (i) all Investment Properties that were sold and leasehold interests which expired, and (ii) all Investment Properties that were held for sale as of December 31, 2010, as discontinued operations. The following is a summary of the earnings from discontinued operations from the Investment Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009  2008 

Revenues:

    

Rental income from operating leases

  $    1,181   $    4,786   $    5,655  

Earned income from direct financing leases

   -    -    100  

Percentage rent

   -    -    25  

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

   48    208    208  

Interest and other income from real estate transactions

   21    118    429  

Interest and other income from non-real estate transactions

   -    5    2  
             
   1,250    5,117    6,419  
             

Operating expenses:

    

General and administrative

   16    7    (71

Real estate

   309    784    374  

Depreciation and amortization

   186    1,438    1,454  

Impairment losses and other charges

   -    3,536    1,730  
             
   511    5,765    3,487  
             

Earnings (loss) before gain on disposition of real estate and income tax benefit (expense)

   739    (648  2,932  

Gain on disposition of real estate

   1,134    2,392    9,980  

Income tax benefit (expense)

   (14  32    2  
             

Earnings from discontinued operations attributable to NNN

  $1,859   $1,776   $12,914  
             

 

72


Table of Contents

Real Estate – Inventory Portfolio – NNN has classified as discontinued operations the revenues and expenses related to (i) Inventory Properties which generated rental revenues prior to disposition, and (ii) Inventory Properties which generated rental revenues and were held for sale as of December 31, 2010. The following is a summary of the earnings from discontinued operations from the Inventory Portfolio for each of the years ended December 31 (dollars in thousands):

 

   2010  2009  2008 

Revenues:

    

Rental income from operating leases

  $3,369   $4,975   $8,646  

Percentage rent

   -    -    139  

Real estate expense reimbursement from tenants

   1,358    1,513    867  

Interest and other from real estate transactions

   513    141    561  
             
   5,240    6,629    10,213  
             

Disposition of real estate:

    

Gross proceeds

   37,470    5,402    151,713  

Costs

   (37,170  (4,844)        (139,069)  
             

Gain

   300    558    12,644  
             

Operating expenses:

    

General and administrative

   71    116    22  

Real estate

   1,755    2,169    1,468  

Depreciation and amortization

   159    323    226  

Impairment losses and other charges

   -    2,094    2,696  
             
   1,985    4,702    4,412  
             

Other expenses (revenues):

    

Interest and other income

   (3  -    (8

Interest expense

   2,655    3,790    5,291  
             
   2,652    3,790    5,283  
             

Earnings (loss) before income tax expense

   903    (1,305  13,162  

Income tax expense

   (611  (201  (3,963
             

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations including noncontrolling interests

   292    (1,506  9,199  

Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests

   11    (166  (2,722
             

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to NNN

  $303   $(1,672 $6,477  
             

Note 19 – Derivatives:

In accordance with the guidance on derivatives and hedging, NNN records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

NNN’s objective in using derivatives is to add stability to interest expense and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. To accomplish this objective, NNN primarily uses treasury locks, forward swaps (“forward hedges”) and interest rate swaps as part of its cash flow hedging strategy. Treasury locks and forward starting swaps are used to hedge forecasted debt issuances. Treasury locks designated as cash flow hedges lock in the yield/price of a treasury security. Forward swaps also lock the associated swap spread. Interest rate swaps

 

73


Table of Contents

designated as cash flow hedges hedging the variable cash flows associated with floating rate debt involve the receipt of variable rate amounts in exchange for fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying principal amount.

For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized directly in earnings.

NNN discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, the derivative is re-designated as a hedging instrument or management determines that designation of the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, NNN continues to carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet, and recognizes any changes in its fair value in earnings or may choose to cash settle the derivative at that time.

In February 2008, NNN terminated its interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $100,000,000 that was hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate hedge when terminated was a liability of $804,000, which NNN recorded as a loss on interest rate hedge.

In September 2007, NNN terminated two interest rate hedges with a combined notional amount of $100,000,000 that were hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate hedges when terminated was a liability of $3,260,000, of which $3,228,000 was deferred in other comprehensive income.

In June 2004, NNN terminated its forward-starting interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $94,000,000 that was hedging the risk of changes in forecasted interest payments on a forecasted issuance of long-term debt. The fair value of the interest rate swaps when terminated was an asset of $4,148,000, which was deferred in other comprehensive income.

As of December 31, 2010, $715,000 remains in other comprehensive income related to the effective portion of NNN’s previous interest rate hedges. During the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, NNN reclassed $165,000, $159,000 and $162,000, respectively, out of other comprehensive income as a reduction to interest expense. Over the next 12 months, NNN estimates that an additional $172,000 will be reclassified as a reduction in interest expense. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on NNN’s long-term debt.

NNN does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes or currently have any derivatives that are not designated as hedges. NNN had no derivative financial instruments outstanding at December 31, 2010.

 

74


Table of Contents

Note 20 – Performance Incentive Plan:

In June 2007, NNN filed a registration statement on Form S-8 with the Commission which permits the issuance of up to 5,900,000 shares of common stock pursuant to NNN’s 2007 Performance Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan replaced NNN’s previous Performance Incentive Plan. The 2007 Plan allows NNN to award or grant to key employees, directors and persons performing consulting or advisory services for NNN or its affiliates, stock options, stock awards, stock appreciation rights, Phantom Stock Awards, Performance Awards and Leveraged Stock Purchase Awards, each as defined in the 2007 Plan.

The following summarizes NNN’s stock-based compensation activity for each of the years ended December 31:

 

   Number of Shares 
   2010  2009  2008 

Outstanding, January 1

   12,154    77,004    118,804  

Options granted

   -    -    -  

Options exercised

   (4,654  (51,500  (28,000

Options surrendered

   -    (13,350  (13,800
             

Outstanding, December 31

   7,500    12,154    77,004  
             

Exercisable, December 31

   7,500    12,154    77,004  
             

The following represents the weighted average option exercise price information for each of the years ended December 31:

 

   2010   2009   2008 

Outstanding, January 1

  $    13.72    $    14.00    $    13.64  

Granted during the year

   -     -     -  

Exercised during the year

   13.08     13.72     11.17  

Outstanding, December 31

   14.11     13.72     14.00  

Exercisable, December 31

   14.11     13.72     14.00  

The following summarizes the outstanding options and the exercisable options at December 31, 2010:

 

  Total 

Outstanding options:

 

Number of shares

  7,500  

Weighted-average exercise price

 $14.11  

Weighted-average remaining contractual life in years

  1.8  

Exercisable options:

 

Number of shares

  7,500  

Weighted-average exercise price

 $        14.11  

One-third of the option grant to each individual becomes exercisable at the end of each of the first three years of service following the date of the grant and the options’ maximum term is 10 years. At December 31, 2010, the intrinsic value of options outstanding was $93,000. All options outstanding at December 31, 2010, were exercisable. During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, NNN received proceeds totaling $61,000, $707,000 and $313,000, respectively, in connection with the exercise of options. NNN issued new common stock to satisfy share option exercises. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, was $43,000, $240,000 and $327,000, respectively.

 

75


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the 2007 Plan, NNN has granted and issued shares of restricted stock to certain officers, directors and key associates of NNN. The following summarizes the activity for the year ended December 31, 2010, of such grants.

 

   Number
of
Shares
  Weighted
Average
Share Price
 

Non-vested restricted shares, January 1

   668,010   $        16.95  

Restricted shares granted

   392,474    21.38  

Restricted shares vested

   (142,637  19.80  

Restricted shares forfeited

   (15,310  11.23  
      

Non-vested restricted shares, December 31

   902,537   $18.52  
      

During the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2008, a total of 15,310 and 2,520, respectively, of restricted shares were forfeited. No shares were forfeited in 2009.

Compensation expense for the restricted stock which is not contingent upon NNN’s performance goals is determined based upon the fair value at the date of grant, assuming a 1.3% forfeiture rate, and is recognized as the greater of the amount amortized over a straight lined basis or the amount vested over the vesting periods. Vesting periods for officers and key associates of NNN range from four to seven years and generally vest yearly on a straight line basis.

During the year ended December 31, 2008, NNN granted 81,330 performance based shares with a weighted average grant price of $8.00 to certain executive officers of NNN. The compensation expense for the grant is based upon fair market value of the grant calculated by a third party using a lattice model with the following assumptions: (i) risk free rate of 3.48%, (ii) a dividend rate of 6.50%, (iii) a term of five years, and (iv) a volatility of 19.89%. Volatility is based upon the historical volatility of NNN’s stock and other factors. The vesting of these shares is contingent upon the achievement of certain performance goals by January 1, 2013.

During the year ended December 31, 2010, NNN granted 91,000 performance based shares subject to its earnings based growth after a three year period relative to its peers. The shares were granted to certain executive officers and had weighted average grant price of $23.12 per share. Once the performance criteria are met and the actual number of shares earned is determined, the shares vest immediately. NNN considers the likelihood of meeting the performance criteria based upon management’s estimates and analysis of future earnings based growth relative to its peers from which it determines the amounts to be recognized. Compensation expense is recognized over the requisite service period.

The following summarizes other grants made during the year ended December 31, 2010, pursuant to the 2007 Plan.

 

  Shares   Weighted
Average
  Share Price  
 

Other share grants under the 2007 Plan:

   

Directors’ fees

  10,092    $          23.38  

Deferred Directors’ fees

  25,066     23.54  
      
  35,158    $23.50  
      

Shares available under the 2007 Plan for grant, end of period

  4,860,190    
      

 

76


Table of Contents

The total compensation cost for share-based payments for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, totaled $5,310,000, $4,172,000 and $3,341,000, respectively, of such compensation expense. At December 31, 2010, NNN had $9,366,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements under the 2007 Plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.

Note 21 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

NNN believes the carrying value of its Credit Facility approximates fair value based upon its nature, terms and variable interest rate. NNN believes that the carrying value of its cash and cash equivalents, mortgages, notes and other receivables, mortgages payable and other liabilities at December 31, 2010 and 2009, approximate fair value based upon current market prices of similar issues. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the carrying value and fair value of NNN’s notes payable and convertible notes payable, collectively, was $1,044,621,000 and $987,275,000, respectively, based upon the quoted market price.

Note 22 – Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited):

The following table outlines NNN’s quarterly financial data (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

 

2010

 First
Quarter
  Second
Quarter
  Third
Quarter
  Fourth
Quarter
 

Revenues as originally reported

 $    56,626   $    56,496   $    56,656   $    59,440  

Reclassified to discontinued operations

  (101  (54  (7  -  
                

Adjusted revenue

 $56,525   $56,442   $56,649   $59,440  
                

Net earnings attributable to NNN’s stockholders

 $16,365   $21,207   $21,210   $14,215  
                

Net earnings per share (1):

    

Basic

 $0.18   $0.23   $0.23   $0.15  

Diluted

  0.18    0.23    0.23    0.15  

2009

            

Revenues as originally reported

 $57,963   $58,681   $57,035   $57,750  

Reclassified to discontinued operations

  114    (546  59    (242
                

Adjusted revenue

 $58,077   $58,135   $57,094   $57,508  
                

Net earnings (loss) attributable to NNN’s stockholders

 $26,804   $18,090   $22,443   $(12,527
                

Net earnings (loss) per share (1):

    

Basic

 $0.32   $0.21   $0.26   $(0.18

Diluted

  0.32    0.20    0.26    (0.17

(1)     Calculated independently for each period and consequently, the sum of the quarters may differ from the annual amount.

         

 

77


Table of Contents

Note 23 – Segment Information:

NNN has identified two primary financial segments: (i) Investment Assets, and (ii) Inventory Assets. The following tables represent the segment data and reconciliation to NNN’s consolidated totals for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 (as adjusted) (dollars in thousands):

 

2010

      Investment    
Assets
      Inventory    
Assets
      Eliminations    
(Intercompany)
      Consolidated    
Totals
 

External revenues

  $223,870   $(40 $-   $223,830  

Intersegment revenues

   671    534    (1,205  -  

Interest revenue

   3,231    48    -    3,279  

Interest revenue on Residuals

   3,460    -    -    3,460  

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   -    426    215    641  

Retail operations, net

   1,311    -    -    1,311  

Interest expense

   67,834    (1,450  (1,205  65,179  

Depreciation and amortization

   48,320    8    -    48,328  

Operating expenses

   31,983    4,329    -    36,312  

Impairment losses and other charges

   7,458    260    (260  7,458  

Impairment – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

   3,995    -    -    3,995  

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate

   (372  -    800    428  

Income tax benefit (expense)

   (1,434  959    -    (475
                 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

   71,147    (1,220  1,275    71,202  

Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

   1,859    292    -    2,151  
                 

Earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests

   73,006    (928  1,275    73,353  

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations

   (9  (358  -    (367

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations

   -    11    -    11  
                 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to NNN

  $72,997   $(1,275 $1,275   $72,997  
                 

Assets

  $        2,846,036   $        38,997   $            (171,458 $          2,713,575  
                 

Additions to long-lived assets:

     

Real estate

  $230,928   $478   $-   $231,406  
                 

 

78


Table of Contents

2009

      Investment    
Assets
      Inventory    
Assets
      Eliminations    
(Intercompany)
      Consolidated    
Totals
 

External revenues

  $223,262   $194   $-   $223,456  

Intersegment revenues

   3,035    1,042    (4,077  -  

Interest revenue

   4,447    30    -    4,477  

Interest revenue Residuals

   4,252    -    -    4,252  

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   -    5    32    37  

Retail operations, net

   419    -    -    419  

Interest expense

   66,018    188    (4,055  62,151  

Depreciation and amortization

   46,529    10    -    46,539  

Operating expenses

   30,335    5,080    -    35,415  

Impairment losses and other charges

   29,367    6,713    -    36,080  

Impairments – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

   498    -    -    498  

Restructuring costs

   731    -    -    731  

Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated affiliates

   (12,280  -    12,701    421  

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   3,432    -    -    3,432  

Income tax benefit

   462    587    -    1,049  
                 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

   53,551    (10,133  12,711    56,129  

Earnings (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

   1,776    (1,506  -    270  
                 

Earnings (loss) including noncontrolling interests

   55,327    (11,639  12,711    56,399  

Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations

   (517  (906  -    (1,423

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations

   -    (166  -    (166
                 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to NNN

  $54,810   $(12,711 $12,711   $54,810  
                 

Assets

  $        2,588,408   $        237,715   $            (235,161 $          2,590,962  
                 

Additions to long-lived assets:

     

Real estate

  $44,433   $2,457   $-   $46,890  
                 

 

79


Table of Contents

2008

      Investment    
Assets
      Inventory    
Assets
      Eliminations    
(Intercompany)
      Consolidated    
Totals
 

External revenues

  $217,682   $204   $-   $217,886  

Intersegment revenues

   12,727    606    (13,333  -  

Interest revenue

   8,190    -    -    8,190  

Interest revenue on Residuals

   4,636    -    -    4,636  

Gain on the disposition of real estate, Inventory Portfolio

   -    (308  329    21  

Interest expense

   69,763    7,442    (13,241  63,964  

Depreciation and amortization

   43,626    42    -    43,668  

Operating expenses

   25,489    9,538    -    35,027  

Impairment losses and other charges

   1,234    -    -    1,234  

Impairments – commercial mortgage residual interests valuation adjustment

   758    -    -    758  

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

   (2,785  -    3,149    364  

Loss on derivative instrument

   (804  -    -    (804

Gain on extinguishment of debt

   4,961    -    -    4,961  

Income tax benefit

   1,329    5,926    -    7,255  
                 

Earnings (loss) from continuing operations

   105,066    (10,594  3,386    97,858  

Earnings from discontinued operations, net of income tax expense

   12,914    9,199    -    22,113  
                 

Earnings including noncontrolling interests

   117,980    (1,395  3,386    119,971  

Loss (earnings) attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations

   (827  731    -    (96

Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations

   -    (2,722  -    (2,722
                 

Net earnings (loss) attributable to NNN

  $117,153   $(3,386 $3,386   $117,153  
                 

Assets

  $        2,650,040   $        128,916   $            (129,485 $          2,649,471  
                 

Additions to long-lived assets:

     

Real estate

  $352,618   $33,745   $-   $386,363  
                 

 

80


Table of Contents

Note 24 – Fair Value Measurements:

NNN currently values its Residuals based upon an independent valuation which provides a discounted cash flow analysis based upon prepayment speeds, expected loan losses and yield curves. These valuation inputs are generally considered unobservable; therefore, the Residuals are considered Level 3 financial assets. The table below presents a reconciliation of the Residuals during the year ended December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

 

Balance at beginning of period

  $20,153  

Total gains (losses) – realized/unrealized:

  

Included in earnings

   (3,995

Included in other comprehensive income

   1,272  

Interest income on Residuals

   3,460  

Cash received from Residuals

   (4,975

Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements, net

   -  

Transfers in and/or out of Level 3

   -  
     

Balance at end of period

  $    15,915  
     

Changes in gains (losses) included in earnings attributable to a change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to assets still held at the end of period

  $(133
     

Note 25 – Major Tenants:

As of December 31, 2010, NNN did not have any tenant that accounted for ten percent or more of its rental and earned income.

Note 26 – Commitments and Contingencies:

As of December 31, 2010, NNN had letters of credit totaling $647,000 outstanding under its Credit Facility.

In the ordinary course of its business, NNN is a party to various other legal actions which management believes are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of the business of NNN. Management believes that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon its operations, financial condition or liquidity.

Note 27 – Subsequent Events:

NNN reviewed all subsequent events and transactions that have occurred after December 31, 2010, the date of the consolidated balance sheet. There were no subsequent events or transactions.

 

81


Table of Contents

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Process for Assessment and Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financing Reporting.

NNN carried out an assessment as of December 31, 2010, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting. This assessment was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) require NNN to present the conclusions of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer about the effectiveness of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the conclusions of NNN’s management about the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

CEO and CFO Certifications.  Included as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forms of “Certification” of NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. The forms of Certification are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This section of the Annual Report on Form 10-K that stockholders are currently reading is the information concerning the assessment referred to in the Section 302 certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures and Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in NNN’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to NNN’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and affected by NNN’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and includes those policies and procedures that:

 

  

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of NNN’s assets;

 

  

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that NNN’s receipts and expenditures are being made in accordance with authorizations of management or the Board of Directors; and

 

  

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of NNN’s assets that could have a material adverse effect on NNN’s financial statements.

 

82


Table of Contents

Scope of the Assessments.  The assessment by NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and the assessment by NNN’s management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting included a review of procedures and discussions with NNN’s management and others at NNN. In the course of the assessments, NNN sought to identify data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and to confirm that appropriate corrective action, including process improvements, were being undertaken.

NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is also assessed on an ongoing basis by personnel in NNN’s Accounting department and by NNN’s internal auditors in connection with their internal audit activities. The overall goals of these various assessment activities are to monitor NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting and to make modifications as necessary. NNN’s intent in this regard is that the disclosure controls and procedures and the internal control over financial reporting will be maintained and updated (including with improvements and corrections) as conditions warrant. Management also sought to deal with other control matters in the assessment, and in each case if a problem was identified, management considered what revision, improvement and/or correction was necessary to be made in accordance with NNN’s on-going procedures. The assessments of NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures and NNN’s internal control over financial reporting is done on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions concerning effectiveness of those controls can be reported in NNN’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Assessment of Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for NNN. Management used the criteria issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework to assess the effectiveness of NNN’s internal control over financial reporting. Based upon the assessments, NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2010, NNN’s internal control over financial reporting was effective.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Ernst & Young LLP, NNN’s independent registered public accounting firm, audited the financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has issued an attestation report on NNN’s effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

During the three months ended December 31, 2010, there were no changes in NNN’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, NNN’s internal control for financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls.

Management, including NNN’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that NNN’s disclosure controls and procedures or NNN’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of

 

83


Table of Contents

controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within NNN have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management’s override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Item 9B.  Other Information

None.

 

84


Table of Contents

PART III

Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Nominees,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Executive Officers,” “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Code of Business Conduct” and “Security Ownership,” and the information in such sections is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.  Executive Compensation

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the sections thereof captioned “Proposal I: Election of Directors – Compensation of Directors,” “Executive Compensation” and “Compensation Committee Report,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Executive Compensation – Equity Compensation Plan Information,” and “Security Ownership,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and the information in such section is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Reference is made to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14(a); information responsive to this Item is contained in the section thereof captioned “Audit Committee Report” and “Proposal II: Proposal to Ratify Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” and the information in such sections are incorporated herein by reference.

 

85


Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15.  Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report.

 

(1)  FinancialStatements    
  Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm   44  
  Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2010 and 2009   46  
  Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008   47  
  Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008   49  
  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008   52  
  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements   54  
(2)  

FinancialStatement Schedules

  
  Schedule III – Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization and Notes as of December 31, 2010  
  Schedule IV – Mortgage Loans on Real Estate and Notes as of December 31, 2010  

All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or because the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

 

 (3)Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as a part of this report.

 

 3.Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
 3.1First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 3.2Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 11, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

86


Table of Contents
 3.3Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference; second amendment filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

 

 4.1Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.2Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.3Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated September 20, 2000, by and among Registrant and First Union National Bank, Trustee, relating to $20,000,000 of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.4Form of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.5Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of May 30, 2002, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $50,000,000 of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.6Form of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.7Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated as of June 18, 2004, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

87


Table of Contents
 4.8Form of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.9Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.10Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.11Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2006, between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.12Form of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.13Specimen certificate representing the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.14Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.15Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.16Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

88


Table of Contents
 4.17Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.18Form of 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.Material Contracts

 

 10.12007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.2Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.3Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.4Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.5Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.6Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.7Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

89


Table of Contents
 10.8Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.9Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2009, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.10Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed herewith).

 

 10.11Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed herewith).

 

 10.12Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed herewith).

 

 10.13Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed herewith).

 

 10.14Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed herewith).

 

 12.Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).

 

 21.Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).

 

 23.Consent of Independent Accountants

 

 23.1Ernst & Young LLP dated February 24, 2011 (filed herewith).

 

 24.Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

 

 31.Section 302 Certifications

 

 31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

90


Table of Contents
 32.Section 906 Certifications

 

 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 99.Additional Exhibits

 

 99.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).

 

 101.Interactive Data File

 

 101.1The following materials from National Retail Properties, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) condensed consolidated balance sheets, (ii) condensed consolidated statements of earnings, (iii) condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, and (iv) notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).

 

91


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 24th day of February, 2011.

 

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC.

By:

    /s/ Craig Macnab
   Craig Macnab
   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

92


Table of Contents

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints each of Craig Macnab and Kevin B. Habicht as his attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution for him in any and all capacities, to sign any or all amendments to this report and to file same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, granting unto such attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Signature

  

Title

 

Date

/s/ Craig Macnab

Craig Macnab

  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
 February 24, 2011

/s/ Ted B. Lanier

Ted B. Lanier

  Lead Director February 24, 2011

/s/ Don DeFosset

Don DeFosset

  Director February 24, 2011

/s/ David M. Fick

David M. Fick

  Director February 24, 2011

/s/ Dennis E. Gershenson

Dennis E. Gershenson

  Director February 24, 2011

/s/ Richard B. Jennings

Richard B. Jennings

  Director February 24, 2011

/s/ Robert C. Legler

Robert C. Legler

  Director February 24, 2011

/s/ Robert Martinez

Robert Martinez

  Director February 24, 2011

/s/ Kevin B. Habicht

Kevin B. Habicht

  Director, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer),
Executive Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Treasurer
 February 24, 2011

 

93


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

 

3.Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws

 

 3.1First Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 3.2Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of 7.375% Series C Cumulative Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, dated October 11, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 3.3Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, as amended (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 1, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference; second amendment filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

4.Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures

 

 4.1Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement No. 1-11290 on Form 8-B filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.2Indenture, dated as of March 25, 1998, between the Registrant and First Union National Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-132095) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.3Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 3 dated September 20, 2000, by and among Registrant and First Union National Bank, Trustee, relating to $20,000,000 of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.4Form of 8.5% Notes due 2010 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 20, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.5

Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 4 dated as of May 30, 2002, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $50,000,000 of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the

 

94


Table of Contents
 

Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.6Form of 7.75% Notes due 2012 (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 4, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.7Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 5 dated as of June 18, 2004, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.8Form of 6.25% Notes due 2014 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 18, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.9Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 6 dated as of November 17, 2005, by and among Registrant and Wachovia Bank, National Association, Trustee, relating to $150,000,000 of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.10Form of 6.15% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.11Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 13, 2006, between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.12Form of 3.95% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 7, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 13, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.13Specimen certificate representing the 7.375% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Registrant (filed as Exhibit 4.4 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated October 11, 2006 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.14

Deposit Agreement, among the Registrant, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Depositary, and the holders of depositary receipts (filed as Exhibit 4.18 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed

 

95


Table of Contents
 

with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 6, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.15Form of Supplemental Indenture No. 8 between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.16Form of 6.875% Notes due 2017 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 4, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.17Form of Ninth Supplemental Indenture between National Retail Properties, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association relating to 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to Registrants’ Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 4.18Form of 5.125% Convertible Senior Notes due 2028 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

10.Material Contracts

 

 10.12007 Performance Incentive Plan (filed as Annex A to the Registrant’s 2007 Annual Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 3, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.2Form of Restricted Stock Agreement between NNN and the Participant of NNN (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.3Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.4Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.5Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

96


Table of Contents
 10.6Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.7Employment Agreement dated as of December 1, 2008, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 3, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.8Form of Indemnification Agreement (as entered into between the Registrant and each of its directors and executive officers) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 12, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.9Credit Agreement, dated as of November 3, 2009, by and among the Registrant, certain lenders and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as the Administrative Agent (filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference).

 

 10.10Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Craig Macnab (filed herewith).

 

 10.11Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Julian E. Whitehurst (filed herewith).

 

 10.12Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Kevin B. Habicht (filed herewith).

 

 10.13Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Paul E. Bayer (filed herewith).

 

 10.14Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of November 8, 2010, between the Registrant and Christopher P. Tessitore (filed herewith).

 

12.Statement of Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges (filed herewith).

 

21.Subsidiaries of the Registrant (filed herewith).

 

23.Consent of Independent Accountants

 

 23.1Ernst & Young LLP dated February 24, 2011 (filed herewith).

 

24.Power of Attorney (included on signature page).

 

31.Section 302 Certifications

 

 31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

97


Table of Contents
 31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

32.Section 906 Certifications

 

 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

 

99.Additional Exhibits

 

 99.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual (filed herewith).

 

101.Interactive Data File

 

 101.1The following materials from National Retail Properties, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language: (i) condensed consolidated balance sheets, (ii) condensed consolidated statements of earnings, (iii) condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, and (iv) notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).

 

98


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

December 31, 2010

(Dollars in thousands)

 

        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Operating Leases:

      

           

7-Eleven:

            

Land O’ Lakes, FL

  —      1,077    817    —      —      1,077    817    1,894    244    1999    10/98 (g)   40 years  

Tampa, FL

  —      1,081    917    —      —      1,070    917    1,987    270    1999    12/98 (g)   40 years  

A.C. Moore Arts & Crafts, Inc.:

            

Dover, NJ

  —      1,138    3,238    —      —      1,138    3,238    4,376    982    1995    11/98    40 years  

Academy:

            

Beaumont, TX

  —      1,424    2,449    —      —      1,424    2,449    3,873    722    1992    03/99    40 years  

Houston, TX

  —      2,311    1,628    —      —      2,311    1,628    3,939    480    1976    03/99    40 years  

Pasadena, TX

  —      900    2,181    —      —      900    2,181    3,081    643    1994    03/99    40 years  

Franklin, TN

  —      1,807    2,108    —      —      1,807    2,108    3,915    389    1999    06/05    30 years  

Ace Hardware and Lighting:

            

Bourbonnais, IL

  —      298    1,329    —      —      298    1,329    1,627    335    1997    11/98    37 years  

Advance Auto Parts:

            

Miami, FL

  —      867    —      1,035    —      867    1,035    1,902    143    2005    12/04 (g)   40 years  

All Star Sports:

            

Wichita, KS

  —      3,275    1,631    —      —      3,275    1,631    4,906    148    1988    05/07    40 years  

Wichita, KS

  —      1,551    965    —      —      1,551    965    2,516    87    1987    05/07    40 years  

Amazing Jake’s:

            

Plano, TX

  —      5,705    17,049    —      —      5,705    17,049    22,754    1,198    1982    07/08    35 years  

AMC Theatre:

            

Bloomington, IN

  —      2,338    4,000    —      —      2,338    4,000    6,338    527    1987    09/07    25 years  

Brighton, CO

  —      1,070    5,491    —      —      1,070    5,491    6,561    452    2005    09/07    40 years  

Castle Rock, CO

  —      2,905    5,002    —      —      2,905    5,002    7,907    412    2005    09/07    40 years  

Evansville, IN

  —      1,300    4,269    —      —      1,300    4,269    5,569    401    1999    09/07    35 years  

Galesburg, IL

  —      1,205    2,441    —      —      1,205    2,441    3,646    201    2003    09/07    40 years  

Machesney Park, IL

  —      3,018    8,770    —      —      3,018    8,770    11,788    722    2005    09/07    40 years  

Michigan City, IN

  —      1,996    8,422    —      —      1,996    8,422    10,418    693    2005    09/07    40 years  

Muncie, IN

  —      1,243    5,512    —      —      1,243    5,512    6,755    454    2005    09/07    40 years  

Naperville, IL

  —      6,141    11,624    —      —      6,141    11,624    17,765    957    2006    09/07    40 years  

New Lenox, IL

  —      6,778    10,980    —      —      6,778    10,980    17,758    904    2004    09/07    40 years  

Chicago, IL

  —      7,257    10,955    —      —      7,257    10,955    18,212    810    2007    01/08    40 years  

Johnson Creek, WI

  —      1,433    3,932    —      —      1,433    3,932    5,365    332    1997    01/08    35 years  

Lake Delton, WI

  —      2,063    8,366    —      —      2,063    8,366    10,429    707    1999    01/08    35 years  

Quincy, IL

  —      1,297    2,850    —      —      1,297    2,850    4,147    241    1982    01/08    35 years  

Schererville, IN

  —      6,619    14,225    —      —      6,619    14,225    20,844    1,403    1996    01/08    30 years  

American Payday Loans:

            

Des Moines, IA

  —      108    379    —      —      108    379    487    53    1979    06/05    40 years  

AmerUs Group Warehouse:

            

Des Moines, IA

  —      28    85    —      —      28    85    113    47    1949    06/05    10 years  

Amoco:

            

Miami, FL

  —      969    —      —      —      969    (i  969    (i  (i  05/03    (i

Sunrise, FL

  —      949    —      —      —      949    (i  949    (i  (i  06/03    (i

Amscot:

            

Tampa, FL

  —      1,160    352    —      —      1,160    352    1,512    46    1981    10/05    40 years  

Orlando, FL

  —      764    —      866    —      764    866    1,630    100    2006    12/05    40 years  

Orlando, FL

  —      664    1,011    —      —      664    1,011    1,675    106    2006    12/05    40 years  

Orlando, FL

  —      358    —      922    —      358    922    1,280    103    2006    02/06 (g)   40 years  

Orlando, FL

  —      546    —      938    —      546    938    1,484    103    2006    02/06 (g)   40 years  

Clearwater, FL

  —      456    332    —      —      456    332    788    36    1967    09/06 (g)   40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 1


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at  Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Anna’s Linens:

            

Harlingen, TX

  —      317    756    —      —      317    756    1,073    212    1999    11/98 (f)   40 years  

Applebee’s:

            

Ballwin, MO

  —      1,496    1,404    —      —      1,496    1,404    2,900    317    1995    12/01    40 years  

Cincinnati, OH

  —      312    898    —      —      312    898    1,210    11    2002    08/10    30 years  

Crestview Hills, KY

  —      1,069    1,367    —      —      1,069    1,367    2,436    21    1993    08/10    25 years  

Danville, KY

  —      641    1,645    —      —      641    1,645    2,286    21    2003    08/10    30 years  

Florence, KY

  —      1,075    1,488    —      —      1,075    1,488    2,563    22    1988    08/10    25 years  

Frankfort, KY

  —      862    1,610    —      —      862    1,610    2,472    20    1993    08/10    30 years  

Georgetown, KY

  —      809    1,437    —      —      809    1,437    2,246    18    2001    08/10    30 years  

Hilliard, OH

  —      808    1,846    —      —      808    1,846    2,654    23    1998    08/10    30 years  

Mason, OH

  —      545    941    —      —      545    941    1,486    12    1997    08/10    30 years  

Maysville, KY

  —      513    1,387    —      —      513    1,387    1,900    15    2005    08/10    35 years  

Nicholasville, KY

  —      454    1,077    —      —      454    1,077    1,531    13    2000    08/10    30 years  

Troy, OH

  —      645    862    —      —      645    862    1,507    13    1996    08/10    25 years  

Grove City, OH

  —      511    1,415    —      —      511    1,415    1,926    10    1990    10/10    30 years  

Kettering, OH

  —      359    1,043    —      —      359    1,043    1,402    6    2005    10/10    35 years  

Mesa, AZ

  —      748    1,734    —      —      748    1,734    2,482    12    1998    10/10    30 years  

Mesa, AZ

  —      974    1,514    —      —      974    1,514    2,488    11    1992    10/10    30 years  

Mt. Sterling, KY

  —      510    1,392    —      —      510    1,392    1,902    8    2000    10/10    35 years  

Phoenix, AZ

  —      458    1,099    —      —      458    1,099    1,557    7    2004    10/10    35 years  

Phoenix, AZ

  —      781    1,456    —      —      781    1,456    2,237    10    1995    10/10    30 years  

Arby’s:

            

Colorado Springs, CO

  —      206    534    —      —      206    534    740    121    1998    12/01    40 years  

Thomson, GA

  —      268    504    —      —      268    504    772    114    1997    12/01    40 years  

Washington Courthouse, OH

  —      157    546    —      —      157    546    703    123    1998    12/01    40 years  

Whitmore Lake, MI

  —      171    469    —      —      171    469    640    106    1993    12/01    40 years  

Arizona Oil:

            

Casa Grande, AZ

  —      2,340    1,894    —      —      2,340    1,894    4,234    142    1993    05/08    35 years  

Gilbert, AZ

  —      1,317    1,304    —      —      1,317    1,304    2,621    98    1996    05/08    35 years  

Glendale, AZ

  —      1,817    2,415    —      —      1,817    2,415    4,232    158    2001    05/08    40 years  

Mesa, AZ

  —      2,219    2,140    —      —      2,219    2,140    4,359    140    2000    05/08    40 years  

Mesa, AZ

  —      1,332    1,367    —      —      1,332    1,367    2,699    120    1986    05/08    30 years  

Miami, AZ

  —      762    2,148    —      —      762    2,148    2,910    161    1998    05/08    35 years  

Peoria, AZ

  —      860    1,117    —      —      860    1,117    1,977    98    1987    05/08    30 years  

Prescott, AZ

  —      1,266    1,261    —      —      1,266    1,261    2,527    95    1997    05/08    35 years  

Scottsdale, AZ

  —      1,529    1,373    —      —      1,529    1,373    2,902    103    1999    05/08    35 years  

Sedona, AZ

  —      1,281    1,324    —      —      1,281    1,324    2,605    87    2000    05/08    40 years  

Tucson, AZ

  —      1,105    1,336    —      —      1,105    1,336    2,441    100    1992    05/08    35 years  

Tucson, AZ

  —      1,457    1,619    —      —      1,457    1,619    3,076    121    1995    05/08    35 years  

Tucson, AZ

  —      1,223    1,911    —      —      1,223    1,911    3,134    143    1996    05/08    35 years  

Tucson, AZ

  —      1,083    1,599    —      —      1,083    1,599    2,682    120    1992    05/08    35 years  

Ashley Furniture:

            

Altamonte Springs, FL

  —      2,906    4,877    315    —      2,906    5,192    8,098    1,695    1997    09/97    40 years  

Louisville, KY

  —      1,667    4,989    —      —      1,667    4,989    6,656    722    2005    03/05    40 years  

AT&T:

            

Cincinnati, OH

  —      297    443    331    —      297    774    1,071    133    1999    06/98 (f)   40 years  

Babies “R” Us:

            

Arlington, TX

  —      831    2,612    —      —      831    2,612    3,443    947    1996    06/96    40 years  

Independence, MO

  —      1,679    2,302    115    —      1,679    2,417    4,096    532    1996    12/01    40 years  

Barnes & Noble:

            

Brandon, FL

  —      1,476    1,527    —      —      1,476    1,527    3,003    610    1995    08/94 (f)   40 years  

Glendale, CO

  —      3,245    2,722    —      —      3,245    2,722    5,967    1,106    1994    09/94    40 years  

Houston, TX

  —      3,308    2,396    —      —      3,308    2,396    5,704    913    1995    10/94 (f)   40 years  

Plantation, FL

  4,596 (p)   3,616    —      —      —      3,616    (c  3,616    (c  1996    05/95 (f)   (c

Freehold, NJ (n)

  —      2,917    2,261    —      —      2,917    2,261    5,178    843    1995    01/96    40 years  

Dayton, OH

  —      1,413    3,325    —      —      1,413    3,325    4,738    1,110    1996    05/97    40 years  

Redding, CA

  —      497    1,626    —      —      497    1,626    2,123    550    1997    06/97    40 years  

Memphis, TN

  —      1,574    2,242    —      —      1,574    2,242    3,816    388    1997    09/97    40 years  

Marlton, NJ

  —      2,831    4,319    —      —      2,709    4,319    7,028    1,309    1995    11/98    40 years  

Bealls:

            

Sarasota, FL

  —      1,078    1,795    —      —      1,078    1,795    2,873    325    1996    09/97    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 2


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Beautiful America Dry Cleaners:

            

Orlando, FL

  47 (o)   40    111    —      —      40    111    151    19    2001    02/04    40 years  

Bed Bath & Beyond:

            

Richmond, VA

  2,634 (p)   1,184    2,843    179    —      1,184    3,021    4,205    613    1997    06/98    40 years  

Glendale, AZ

  —      1,082    —      2,758    —      1,082    2,758    3,840    790    1999    12/98 (g)   40 years  

Midland, MI

  —      231    —      2,702    —      231    2,702    2,933    279    2006    07/03    40 years  

Best Buy:

            

Brandon, FL

  —      2,985    2,772    —      —      2,985    2,772    5,757    962    1996    02/97    40 years  

Cuyahoga Falls, OH

  —      3,709    2,359    —      —      3,709    2,359    6,068    799    1970    06/97    40 years  

Rockville, MD

  —      6,233    3,419    —      —      6,233    3,419    9,652    1,150    1995    07/97    40 years  

Fairfax, VA

  —      3,052    3,218    —      —      3,052    3,218    6,270    1,076    1995    08/97    40 years  

St. Petersburg, FL

  4,204 (p)   4,032    2,611    —      —      4,032    2,611    6,643    640    1997    09/97    35 years  

Pittsburg, PA

  —      2,331    2,293    —      —      2,331    2,293    4,624    719    1997    06/98    40 years  

Denver, CO

  —      8,882    4,373    —      —      8,882    4,373    13,255    1,043    1991    06/01    40 years  

Best Smoke & Gas:

            

Abbottstown, PA

  —      55    200    —      —      55    200    255    25    2000    01/06    40 years  

Billy Bob’s:

            

Gresham, OR

  —      817    108    —      —      817    108    925    24    1993    12/01    40 years  

BJ’s Wholesale Club:

            

Orlando, FL

  3,762 (o)   3,271    8,627    367    —      3,271    8,993    12,264    1,539    2001    02/04    40 years  

Black Fox Beauty Supply:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      116    137    195    —      125    332    457    69    1967    11/93    40 years  

Blockbuster Video:

            

Conyers, GA

  —      320    556    —      —      320    556    876    188    1997    06/97    40 years  

Alice, TX

  —      318    578    —      —      318    578    896    131    1995    12/01    40 years  

Gainesville, GA

  —      295    612    —      —      295    612    907    138    1997    12/01    40 years  

Glasgow, KY

  —      303    561    —      —      303    561    864    127    1997    12/01    40 years  

Kingsville, TX

  —      499    458    30    —      499    487    986    106    1995    12/01    40 years  

Mobile, AL

  —      491    498    —      —      491    498    989    113    1997    12/01    40 years  

Mobile, AL

  —      843    562    —      —      843    562    1,405    127    1997    12/01    40 years  

BMW:

            

Duluth, GA

  —      4,434    4,080    6,559    —      4,504    10,639    15,143    1,435    1984    12/01    40 years  

Borders:

            

Wilmington, DE

  —      3,031    6,062    —      —      2,994    6,062    9,056    2,429    1994    12/94    40 years  

Richmond, VA

  —      2,177    2,600    —      —      2,177    2,600    4,777    1,011    1995    06/95    40 years  

Ft. Lauderdale, FL

  4,428 (p)   3,165    3,319    —      —      3,165    3,319    6,484    863    1995    02/96    33 years  

Bangor, ME

  —      1,547    2,487    —      —      1,547    2,487    4,034    903    1996    06/96    40 years  

Altamonte Springs, FL

  —      1,947    —      —      —      1,947    (c  1,947    (c  1997    09/97    (c

Borough of Abbottstown:

            

Abbottstown, PA

  —      55    200    —      —      55    200    255    25    2000    01/06    40 years  

Boston Market:

            

Burton, MI

  —      620    707    —      —      620    707    1,327    160    1997    12/01    40 years  

Geneva, IL

  —      1,125    1,037    —      —      1,125    893    2,018    204    1996    12/01    40 years  

N. Olmsted, OH

  —      602    461    —      —      602    389    991    89    1996    12/01    40 years  

Novi, MI

  —      836    651    —      —      836    298    1,134    72    1995    12/01    40 years  

Orland Park, IL

  —      562    556    —      —      562    377    939    88    1995    12/01    40 years  

Warren, OH

  —      562    468    —      —      562    468    1,030    106    1997    12/01    40 years  

Buccaneer Car Wash:

            

Tampa, FL

  —      541    829    —      —      541    829    1,370    23    1978    04/10    25 years  

Buck’s:

            

St. Louis, MO

  —      776    —      3,822    —      776    3,822    4,598    163    2009    12/07 (m)   40 years  

Buffalo Wild Wings:

            

Michigan City, IN

  —      163    492    —      —      163    492    655    111    1996    12/01    40 years  

Bugaboo Creek:

            

Rochester, NY

  —      792    1,535    —      —      792    1,535    2,327    136    1995    06/07    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 3


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at  Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Burger King:

            

Colonial Heights, VA

  —      662    610    —      —      662    610    1,272    138    1997    12/01    40 years  

Camping World:

            

Vacaville, CA

  —      2,467    6,575    —      —      2,467    6,575    9,042    86    2008    07/10    35 years  

North Little Rock, AR

  —      1,198    3,348    —      —      1,198    3,348    4,546    28    2007    09/10    35 years  

Strafford, MO

  —      1,278    3,694    —      —      1,278    3,694    4,972    31    2007    09/10    35 years  

Carl’s Jr.:

            

Spokane, WA

  —      471    530    —      —      471    530    1,001    120    1996    12/01    40 years  

Chandler, AZ

  —      729    644    —      —      729    644    1,373    178    1984    06/05    20 years  

Tucson, AZ

  —      681    536    103    —      681    639    1,320    344    1988    06/05    10 years  

CarQuest:

            

Abbeville, LA

  —      23    148    —      —      23    148    171    —      1970    12/10    20 years  

Abbotsford, WI

  —      56    163    —      —      56    163    219    —      1984    12/10    25 years  

Aberdeen, SD (n)

  —      71    329    —      —      71    329    400    1    1961    12/10    20 years  

Addison, IL

  —      76    314    —      —      76    314    390    1    1971    12/10    25 years  

Alsip, IL

  —      57    323    —      —      57    323    380    1    1972    12/10    20 years  

Anaconda, MT

  —      35    307    —      —      35    307    342    1    1965    12/10    20 years  

Ann Arbor, MI

  —      25    241    —      —      25    241    266    1    1970    12/10    20 years  

Antigo, WI

  —      96    294    —      —      96    294    390    —      1998    12/10    30 years  

Appleton, WI (n)

  —      85    438    —      —      85    438    523    1    1995    12/10    30 years  

Arden, NC

  —      42    281    —      —      42    281    323    —      1989    12/10    25 years  

Baker, MT

  —      12    140    —      —      12    140    152    —      1965    12/10    20 years  

Bakersfield, CA

  —      77    484    —      —      77    484    561    1    1945    12/10    20 years  

Bangor, ME

  —      51    339    —      —      51    339    390    1    1985    12/10    25 years  

Bangor, ME (n)

  —      53    356    —      —      53    356    409    1    1945    12/10    15 years  

Bartlett, TN

  —      40    293    —      —      40    293    333    —      1989    12/10    25 years  

Bay City, MI

  —      14    100    —      —      14    100    114    —      1942    12/10    15 years  

Bay City, MI

  —      41    282    —      —      41    282    323    —      1989    12/10    25 years  

Bay City, MI

  —      106    521    —      —      106    521    627    1    1920    12/10    15 years  

Bellevue, NE

  —      29    142    —      —      29    142    171    —      1965    12/10    20 years  

Bend, OR

  —      125    245    —      —      125    245    370    1    1935    12/10    15 years  

Biddeford, ME

  —      60    320    —      —      60    320    380    1    1968    12/10    20 years  

Billings, MT

  —      31    188    —      —      31    188    219    —      1970    12/10    25 years  

Bismarck, ND

  —      25    136    —      —      25    136    161    —      1985    12/10    25 years  

Bozeman, MT

  —      28    257    —      —      28    257    285    1    1964    12/10    20 years  

Brunswick, ME

  —      41    254    —      —      41    254    295    —      1985    12/10    25 years  

Bucksport, ME

  —      19    114    —      —      19    114    133    —      1976    12/10    20 years  

Burlington, NC

  —      47    229    —      —      47    229    276    —      1994    12/10    30 years  

Carol Stream, IL

  —      103    515    —      —      103    515    618    1    1960    12/10    20 years  

Chicago, IL

  —      83    383    —      —      83    383    466    1    1987    12/10    25 years  

Chippewa Falls, WI

  —      33    328    —      —      33    328    361    —      1996    12/10    30 years  

Cody, WY (n)

  —      146    253    —      —      146    253    399    —      1999    12/10    30 years  

Colstrip, MT

  —      39    275    —      —      39    275    314    —      1981    12/10    25 years  

Connersville, IN

  —      28    171    —      —      28    171    199    —      1920    12/10    15 years  

Corapolis, PA (n)

  —      74    316    —      —      74    316    390    1    1980    12/10    20 years  

Cut Bank, MT

  —      9    115    —      —      9    115    124    —      1937    12/10    20 years  

Devils Lake, ND

  —      38    276    —      —      38    276    314    —      1999    12/10    30 years  

Dillon, MT

  —      24    204    —      —      24    204    228    —      1973    12/10    20 years  

Dodge City, KS (n)

  —      43    166    —      —      43    166    209    —      1948    12/10    15 years  

Eau Claire, WI

  —      33    204    —      —      33    204    237    —      1956    12/10    20 years  

Elgin, IL

  —      88    311    —      —      88    311    399    1    1965    12/10    20 years  

Enterprise, AL

  —      25    184    —      —      25    184    209    —      1988    12/10    25 years  

Escanaba, MI

  —      40    283    —      —      40    283    323    —      1982    12/10    25 years  

Evansville, IN

  —      60    301    —      —      60    301    361    1    1980    12/10    25 years  

Fairbanks, AK

  —      292    545    —      —      292    545    837    1    2003    12/10    35 years  

Gainesville, FL (n)

  —      47    362    —      —      47    362    409    1    1957    12/10    15 years  

Glasgow, MT

  —      48    275    —      —      48    275    323    1    1972    12/10    20 years  

Great Falls, MT

  —      17    173    —      —      17    173    190    —      1967    12/10    20 years  

Greenville, OH

  —      63    193    —      —      63    193    256    1    1910    12/10    15 years  

Hamilton, MT

  —      24    242    —      —      24    242    266    —      1991    12/10    25 years  

Harlem, MT

  —      17    116    —      —      17    116    133    —      1983    12/10    25 years  

Havre, MT

  —      22    311    —      —      22    311    333    1    1964    12/10    20 years  

Hayward, WI

  —      57    333    —      —      57    333    390    1    1980    12/10    25 years  

Helena, MT

  —      31    282    —      —      31    282    313    —      1987    12/10    25 years  

Houlton, ME

  —      38    219    —      —      38    219    257    1    1915    12/10    10 years  

Irving, TX

  —      182    208    —      —      182    208    390    —      1984    12/10    20 years  

Kalispell, MT (n)

  —      59    645    —      —      59    645    704    1    1998    12/10    30 years  

Kennedale, TX

  —      88    283    —      —      88    283    371    1    1959    12/10    20 years  

Lafayette, LA

  —      51    357    —      —      51    357    408    —      1996    12/10    30 years  

Laurel, MS

  —      74    202    —      —      74    202    276    1    1959    12/10    15 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 4


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at  Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Lewistown, MT

  —      19    180    —      —      19    180    199    —      1964    12/10    25 years  

Libby, MT

  —      33    262    —      —      33    262    295    1    1965    12/10    20 years  

Livingston, MT

  —      34    261    —      —      34    261    295    1    1976    12/10    20 years  

Lufkin, TX (n)

  —      94    229    —      —      94    229    323    —      1986    12/10    20 years  

Madison, TN

  —      78    179    —      —      78    179    257    —      1988    12/10    25 years  

Madison, WI

  —      57    409    —      —      57    409    466    1    1973    12/10    25 years  

Malta, MT

  —      19    181    —      —      19    181    200    —      1976    12/10    25 years  

Marshfield, WI

  —      60    282    —      —      60    282    342    1    1940    12/10    20 years  

Medford, WI

  —      37    229    —      —      37    229    266    —      1988    12/10    25 years  

Memphis, TN

  —      38    199    —      —      38    199    237    —      1987    12/10    25 years  

Metamora, IL

  —      69    292    —      —      69    292    361    —      1996    12/10    30 years  

Midland, MI

  —      44    336    —      —      44    336    380    —      1986    12/10    30 years  

Midland, TX

  —      36    212    —      —      36    212    248    1    1960    12/10    15 years  

Montello, WI

  —      26    173    —      —      26    173    199    —      1997    12/10    30 years  

Muskegon, MI

  —      38    257    —      —      38    257    295    —      1990    12/10    30 years  

Neillsville, WI

  —      26    145    —      —      26    145    171    —      1979    12/10    25 years  

Nicholasville, KY

  —      54    241    —      —      54    241    295    —      1988    12/10    25 years  

Ocala, FL

  —      78    416    —      —      78    416    494    1    1971    12/10    15 years  

Olathe, KS

  —      78    235    —      —      78    235    313    1    1950    12/10    15 years  

Oshkosh, WI

  —      99    224    —      —      99    224    323    —      1999    12/10    30 years  

Overland, MO

  —      68    370    —      —      68    370    438    1    1961    12/10    20 years  

Owosso, MI

  —      50    264    —      —      50    264    314    —      1986    12/10    25 years  

Pearl, MS

  —      43    195    —      —      43    195    238    —      1989    12/10    30 years  

Phillips, WI

  —      23    177    —      —      23    177    200    —      1992    12/10    30 years  

Powell, WY

  —      37    182    —      —      37    182    219    —      1978    12/10    25 years  

Rhinelander, WI

  —      28    115    —      —      28    115    143    —      1958    12/10    20 years  

River Falls, WI

  —      42    234    —      —      42    234    276    —      1976    12/10    20 years  

Riverton, WY

  —      99    300    —      —      99    300    399    1    1978    12/10    25 years  

Rockford, IL

  —      61    376    —      —      61    376    437    1    1962    12/10    25 years  

Roundup, MT

  —      23    205    —      —      23    205    228    —      1972    12/10    20 years  

Schofield, WI

  —      41    425    —      —      41    425    466    1    1968    12/10    20 years  

Sheboygan, WI

  —      77    370    —      —      77    370    447    —      2007    12/10    35 years  

Shelby, MT

  —      20    208    —      —      20    208    228    —      1976    12/10    20 years  

Shelbyville, KY

  —      52    224    —      —      52    224    276    —      1982    12/10    25 years  

Sidney, MT (n)

  —      42    395    —      —      42    395    437    1    1962    12/10    20 years  

Spartanburg, SC

  —      53    252    —      —      53    252    305    —      1972    12/10    25 years  

Spokane, WA

  —      66    201    —      —      66    201    267    —      1965    12/10    20 years  

Spokane, WA

  —      93    373    —      —      93    373    466    1    1972    12/10    20 years  

St. Peter, MN

  —      17    259    —      —      17    259    276    —      1999    12/10    30 years  

Stayton, OR

  —      88    312    —      —      88    312    400    —      1994    12/10    30 years  

Stevens Point, WI (n)

  —      61    405    —      —      61    405    466    1    1975    12/10    25 years  

Sulphur, LA

  —      31    216    —      —      31    216    247    —      1984    12/10    20 years  

Thornton, CO

  —      414    536    —      —      414    536    950    1    1996    12/10    30 years  

Troy, AL

  —      15    52    —      —      15    52    67    —      1966    12/10    15 years  

Wasilla, AK

  —      227    504    —      —      227    504    731    1    2002    12/10    35 years  

Wausau, WI

  —      52    300    —      —      52    300    352    —      1989    12/10    25 years  

Wautoma, WI

  —      18    106    —      —      18    106    124    —      1959    12/10    20 years  

Waynesboro, MS

  —      15    71    —      —      15    71    86    —      1962    12/10    15 years  

West Columbia, SC

  —      41    159    —      —      41    159    200    —      1962    12/10    20 years  

West Memphis, AR

  —      58    294    —      —      58    294    352    —      1987    12/10    25 years  

Whitefish, MT

  —      30    227    —      —      30    227    257    —      1993    12/10    30 years  

Williston, ND

  —      35    297    —      —      35    297    332    —      1999    12/10    30 years  

Windom, MN

  —      5    137    —      —      5    137    142    —      1950    12/10    20 years  

Wisconsin Rapids, WI

  —      41    215    —      —      41    215    256    —      1975    12/10    20 years  

Yakima, WA

  —      50    321    —      —      50    321    371    1    1965    12/10    20 years  

Carvers:

            

Centerville, OH

  —      851    1,059    —      —      851    1,059    1,910    239    1986    12/01    40 years  

Certified Auto Sales:

            

Albuquerque, NM

  —      1,113    —      1,419    —      1,113    1,419    2,532    194    2005    04/04 (f)   40 years  

Champps:

            

Alpharetta, GA

  —      3,033    1,642    —      —      3,033    1,642    4,675    371    1999    12/01    40 years  

Irving, TX

  —      1,760    1,724    —      —      1,760    1,724    3,484    390    2000    12/01    40 years  

Char-Hut:

            

Sunrise, FL

  —      287    424    —      —      287    424    711    70    1979    05/04    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 5


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at  Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Checkers:

            

Orlando, FL

  —      257    —      —      —      257    (c  257    (c  1988    07/92    (c

Cheddar’s Cafe:

            

Baytown, TX

  —      858    2,251    —      —      858    2,251    3,109    2    2010    12/10    40 years  

Chili’s:

            

Camden, SC

  —      627    1,888    —      —      627    1,888    2,515    250    2005    09/05    40 years  

Milledgeville, GA

  —      516    1,997    —      —      516    1,997    2,513    264    2005    09/05    40 years  

Sumter, SC

  —      800    1,717    —      —      800    1,717    2,517    216    2004    12/05    40 years  

Hinesville, GA

  —      921    1,898    —      —      921    1,898    2,819    184    2006    02/07    40 years  

Albany, GA

  —      615    —      1,984    —      615    1,984    2,599    159    2007    06/07 (m)   40 years  

Statesboro, GA

  —      703    —      1,888    —      703    1,888    2,591    147    2007    06/07 (m)   40 years  

Florence, SC

  —      889    1,715    —      —      889    1,715    2,604    152    2007    06/07    40 years  

Valdosta, GA

  —      716    —      1,871    —      716    1,871    2,587    142    2007    07/07 (m)   40 years  

Tifton, GA

  —      454    1,550    —      —      454    1,550    2,004    86    2008    06/08 (m)   40 years  

Evans, GA

  —      700    —      1,511    —      700    1,511    2,211    71    2009    10/08 (m)   40 years  

Jefferson City, MO

  —      305    898    —      —      305    898    1,203    27    2003    12/09    35 years  

Merriam, KS

  —      853    981    —      —      853    981    1,834    34    1998    12/09    30 years  

Wichita, KS

  —      420    623    —      —      420    623    1,043    22    1995    12/09    30 years  

China 1:

            

Cohoes, NY

  —      16    87    6    —      16    93    109    14    1994    09/04    40 years  

China Wok:

            

Carlisle, PA

  —      90    107    —      —      90    107    197    13    1988    01/06    40 years  

Cinemark:

            

Draper, UT

  —      1,523    —      —      —      1,523    (e  1,523    (e  (e  08/10 (m)   (e

Claim Jumper:

            

Roseville, CA

  —      1,557    2,014    —      —      1,557    2,014    3,571    455    2000    12/01    40 years  

Tempe, AZ

  —      2,531    2,921    —      —      2,531    2,921    5,452    660    2000    12/01    40 years  

Continental Rental:

            

Lapeer, MI

  —      88    633    —      —      88    633    721    53    2007    10/05    40 years  

Cool Crest:

            

Independence, MO

  —      1,838    1,534    —      —      1,838    1,534    3,372    139    1988    05/07    40 years  

CORA Rehabilitation Clinics:

            

Orlando, FL

  93 (o)   80    221    —      —      80    221    301    38    2001    02/04    40 years  

CVS:

            

San Antonio, TX

  —      441    —      —      —      441    (c  441    (c  1993    12/93    (c

Lafayette, LA

  —      968    —      —      —      968    (c  968    (c  1995    01/96    (c

Midwest City, OK

  —      673    1,103    —      —      673    1,103    1,776    409    1996    03/96    40 years  

Pantego, TX

  —      1,016    1,449    —      —      1,016    1,449    2,465    491    1997    06/97    40 years  

Flower Mound, TX

  —      932    881    —      —      831    881    1,712    152    1996    09/97    40 years  

Arlington, TX

  —      2,079    —      1,397    —      2,079    1,397    3,476    432    1998    11/97 (g)   40 years  

Leavenworth, KS

  —      726    —      1,331    —      726    1,331    2,057    417    1998    11/97 (g)   40 years  

Lewisville, TX

  —      789    —      1,335    —      789    1,335    2,124    410    1998    04/98 (g)   40 years  

Forest Hill, TX

  —      692    —      1,175    —      692    1,175    1,867    363    1998    04/98 (g)   40 years  

Garland, TX

  —      1,477    —      1,400    —      1,477    1,400    2,877    424    1998    06/98 (g)   40 years  

Oklahoma City, OK

  —      1,581    —      1,471    —      1,581    1,471    3,052    440    1999    08/98 (g)   40 years  

Dallas, TX

  —      2,618    —      2,571    —      2,618    2,571    5,189    463    2003    06/99    40 years  

Gladstone, MO

  —      1,851    —      1,740    —      1,851    1,740    3,591    451    2000    12/99 (g)   40 years  

Dave & Buster’s:

            

Hilliard, OH

  —      934    4,689    —      —      934    4,689    5,623    484    1998    11/06    40 years  

Tulsa, OK

  —      1,862    —      2,105    —      1,862    2,105    3,967    103    2009    04/08 (m)   40 years  

Wauwatosa, WI

  —      5,694    —      5,638    —      5,694    5,638    11,332    112    2010    12/08 (m)   40 years  

Orlando, FL

  —      8,114    —      —      —      8,114    (e  8,114    (e  (e  06/10 (m)   (e

Denny’s:

            

Columbus, TX (n)

  —      428    817    —      —      428    817    1,245    185    1997    12/01    40 years  

Alexandria, VA

  —      604    196    —      —      604    196    800    42    1981    09/06    20 years  

Amarillo, TX

  —      590    632    —      —      590    632    1,222    136    1982    09/06    20 years  

Arlington Heights, IL

  —      470    228    —      —      470    228    698    49    1977    09/06    20 years  

Austintown, OH

  —      466    397    —      —      466    397    863    85    1980    09/06    20 years  

Boardman Township, OH

  —      497    258    —      —      497    258    755    55    1977    09/06    20 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 6


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at  Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Campbell, CA

  —      460    238    —      —      460    238    698    51    1976    09/06    20 years  

Carson, CA

  —      1,246    157    —      —      1,246    157    1,403    34    1975    09/06    20 years  

Chehalis, WA

  —      415    287    —      —      415    287    702    62    1977    09/06    20 years  

Chubbuck, ID

  —      350    394    —      —      344    394    738    85    1983    09/06    20 years  

Clackamas, OR

  —      468    407    —      —      468    407    875    87    1993    09/06    20 years  

Collinsville, IL

  —      676    283    —      —      676    283    959    61    1979    09/06    20 years  

Colorado Springs, CO

  —      585    390    —      —      585    390    975    84    1978    09/06    20 years  

Colorado Springs, CO

  —      321    377    —      —      321    377    698    81    1984    09/06    20 years  

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      345    776    300    —      345    1,076    1,421    192    1980    09/06    20 years  

Dallas, TX

  —      497    150    —      —      497    150    647    32    1979    09/06    20 years  

Enfield, CT

  —      684    229    —      —      684    229    913    49    1976    09/06    20 years  

Fairfax, VA

  —      768    683    —      —      768    683    1,451    147    1979    09/06    20 years  

Federal Way, WA

  —      543    193    —      —      543    193    736    41    1977    09/06    20 years  

Florissant, MO

  —      443    238    —      —      443    238    681    51    1977    09/06    20 years  

Ft. Worth, TX

  —      392    314    —      —      392    314    706    67    1974    09/06    20 years  

Hermitage, PA

  —      321    420    —      —      321    420    741    90    1980    09/06    20 years  

Hialeah, FL

  —      432    175    —      —      432    175    607    38    1978    09/06    20 years  

Houston, TX

  —      504    348    —      —      504    348    852    75    1976    09/06    20 years  

Indianapolis, IN

  —      310    590    —      —      310    590    900    127    1981    09/06    20 years  

Indianapolis, IN

  —      326    511    —      —      326    511    837    110    1978    09/06    20 years  

Indianapolis, IN

  —      358    767    —      —      358    767    1,125    165    1978    09/06    20 years  

Indianapolis, IN

  —      231    511    —      —      231    511    742    110    1974    09/06    20 years  

Kernersville, NC

  —      407    557    —      —      407    557    964    120    2000    09/06    20 years  

Lafayette, IN

  —      424    773    —      —      416    773    1,189    166    1978    09/06    20 years  

Laurel, MD

  —      528    379    —      —      528    379    907    81    1976    09/06    20 years  

Little Rock, AR

  —      672    77    —      —      672    77    749    16    1979    09/06    20 years  

Little Rock, AR

  —      703    180    —      —      703    180    883    39    1979    09/06    20 years  

Maplewood, MN

  —      630    271    —      —      630    271    901    58    1983    09/06    20 years  

Merriville, IN

  —      368    813    —      —      368    813    1,181    174    1976    09/06    20 years  

Middleburg Heights, OH

  —      497    260    —      —      497    260    757    56    1976    09/06    20 years  

N. Miami, FL

  —      855    151    —      —      855    151    1,006    32    1977    09/06    20 years  

Nampa, ID

  —      357    729    —      —      357    729    1,086    156    1979    09/06    20 years  

North Richland Hills, TX

  —      500    130    —      —      500    130    630    28    1970    09/06    20 years  

Novi, MI

  —      545    305    —      —      545    305    850    66    1979    09/06    20 years  

Omaha, NE

  —      496    314    —      —      496    314    810    67    1994    09/06    20 years  

Pompano Beach, FL

  —      436    394    —      —      436    394    830    84    1976    09/06    20 years  

Portland, OR

  —      764    161    —      —      764    161    925    35    1977    09/06    20 years  

Provo, UT

  —      519    216    —      —      519    216    735    46    1978    09/06    20 years  

Pueblo, CO

  —      475    302    —      —      475    302    777    65    1980    09/06    20 years  

Raleigh, NC

  —      1,094    482    —      —      1,094    482    1,576    103    1984    09/06    20 years  

Southfield, MI

  —      401    330    —      —      401    330    731    71    1980    09/06    20 years  

St. Louis, MO

  —      520    266    —      —      520    266    786    57    1973    09/06    20 years  

Sugarland, TX

  —      315    334    —      —      315    334    649    72    1997    09/06    20 years  

Tacoma, WA

  —      580    201    —      —      580    201    781    43    1984    09/06    20 years  

Tucson, AZ

  —      922    290    —      —      922    290    1,212    62    1979    09/06    20 years  

Wethersfield, CT

  —      884    176    —      —      884    176    1,060    38    1978    09/06    20 years  

Worcester, MA

  —      383    493    —      —      383    493    876    106    1978    09/06    20 years  

Boise, ID

  —      514    477    —      —      514    477    991    96    1983    12/06    20 years  

St. Louis, MO

  —      635    303    —      —      635    303    938    60    1980    01/07    20 years  

Virginia Gardens, FL

  —      793    133    —      —      793    133    926    26    1977    01/07    20 years  

Dick’s Sporting Goods:

            

Taylor, MI

  —      1,920    3,527    —      —      1,920    3,527    5,447    1,260    1996    08/96    40 years  

White Marsh, MD

  —      2,681    3,917    —      —      2,681    3,917    6,598    1,400    1996    08/96    40 years  

Dimitri’s Family Restaurant:

            

Indianapolis, IN

  —      223    483    —      —      223    483    706    104    1979    09/06    20 years  

Dollar General:

            

Memphis, TN

  —      266    1,136    46    —      266    1,182    1,448    329    1998    12/97    40 years  

High Springs, FL

  —      432    —      —      —      432    (e  432    (e  (e  07/10 (m)   (e

Inverness, FL

  —      459    —      —      —      459    (e  459    (e  (e  08/10 (m)   (e

Cocoa, FL

  —      406    —      —      —      406    (e  406    (e  (e  08/10 (m)   (e

Palm Bay, FL

  —      355    —      —      —      355    (e  355    (e  (e  08/10 (m)   (e

Deland, FL

  —      585    —      —      —      585    (e  585    (e  (e  11/10 (m)   (e

Seffner, FL

  —      659    —      —      —      659    (e  659    (e  (e  12/10 (m)   (e

Dollar Tree:

            

Garland, TX

  —      239    626    —      —      239    626    865    149    1994    02/94    40 years  

Copperas Cove, TX

  —      242    512    194    —      242    706    948    200    1972    11/98    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 7


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at  Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Donato’s:

            

Medina, OH

  —      405    464    —      —      405    464    869    105    1996    12/01    40 years  

Dr. Clean Dry Cleaners:

            

Monticello, NY

  —      20    72    —      —      20    72    92    10    1996    03/05    40 years  

Easyhome:

            

Cohoes, NY

  —      64    348    242    —      64    590    654    69    1994    09/04    40 years  

Ecotech Institute:

            

Aurora, CO

  —      5,076    13,874    6,043    —      5,076    19,917    24,993    1,294    1986    04/07    40 years  

El Tapatio Grill:

            

Hammond, LA

  —      248    814    62    —      248    627    875    156    1997    12/01    40 years  

Enterprise Rent-A-Car:

            

Wilmington, NC

  —      218    327    33    —      218    360    578    76    1981    12/01    40 years  

Express Oil Change:

            

Birmingham, AL

  —      470    695    —      —      470    695    1,165    49    2008    02/08 (f)   40 years  

Florence, AL

  —      110    381    —      —      110    381    491    37    1987    02/08    30 years  

Helena, AL

  —      363    628    —      —      363    628    991    45    1998    02/08    40 years  

Muscle Shoals, AL

  —      168    624    —      —      168    624    792    60    1985    02/08    30 years  

Opelika, AL

  —      547    680    —      —      547    680    1,227    49    2006    02/08    40 years  

Cordova, TN

  —      639    785    —      —      639    785    1,424    40    2000    12/08    40 years  

Horn Lake, MS

  —      326    611    —      —      326    611    937    36    1998    12/08    35 years  

Lakeland, TN

  —      186    489    —      —      186    489    675    25    2000    12/08    40 years  

Memphis, TN

  —      402    721    —      —      402    721    1,123    37    2001    12/08    40 years  

Fallas Paredes:

            

Arlington, TX

  —      318    1,680    242    —      318    1,923    2,241    623    1996    06/96    38 years  

Family Dollar:

            

Albany, NY (n)

  —      34    824    —      —      34    824    858    130    1992    09/04    40 years  

Cohoes, NY

  —      94    507    33    —      94    540    634    80    1994    09/04    40 years  

Hudson Falls, NY

  —      51    380    —      —      51    380    431    60    1993    09/04    40 years  

Monticello, NY

  —      96    352    —      —      96    352    448    51    1996    03/05    40 years  

Famous Footwear:

            

Lapeer, MI

  —      163    835    —      —      163    835    998    69    2007    10/05    40 years  

Fantastic Sams:

            

Eden Prairie, MN

  —      65    181    81    —      65    261    326    56    1997    12/01    40 years  

Fazoli’s:

            

Bay City, MI

  —      647    634    —      —      647    634    1,281    143    1997    12/01    40 years  

Ferguson:

            

Destin, FL

  —      554    1,012    253    —      554    1,265    1,819    111    2006    03/07    40 years  

First Watch Restaurant:

            

Tulsa, OK

  —      325    314    34    —      325    382    707    68    1978    09/06    20 years  

Flash Markets:

            

Lebanon, TN

  —      582    —      2,063    —      582    2,063    2,645    148    2007    03/07    40 years  

Food 4 Less:

            

Chula Vista, CA

  —      3,569    —      —      —      3,569    (c  3,569    (c  1995    11/98    (c

Food Fast:

            

Bossier City, LA

  —      883    658    —      —      883    658    1,541    155    1975    06/07    15 years  

Brownsboro, TX

  —      328    385    —      —      328    385    713    45    1990    06/07    30 years  

Flint, TX

  —      272    411    —      —      272    411    683    58    1985    06/07    25 years  

Forney, TX

  —      545    707    —      —      545    707    1,252    83    1989    06/07    30 years  

Forney, TX

  —      473    654    —      —      473    654    1,127    77    1990    06/07    30 years  

Gun Barrel City, TX

  —      242    467    —      —      242    467    709    66    1988    06/07    25 years  

Gun Barrel City, TX

  —      270    386    —      —      270    386    656    55    1986    06/07    25 years  

Jacksonville, TX

  —      660    632    —      —      660    632    1,292    149    1976    06/07    15 years  

Kemp, TX

  —      581    505    —      —      581    505    1,086    72    1986    06/07    25 years  

Longview, TX

  —      403    572    —      —      403    572    975    81    1985    06/07    25 years  

Longview, TX

  —      426    382    —      —      426    382    808    54    1984    06/07    25 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 8


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Longview, TX

  —      360    535    —      —      360    535    895    76    1983    06/07    25 years  

Longview, TX

  —      178    236    —      —      178    236    414    42    1977    06/07    20 years  

Longview, TX

  —      252    304    —      —      252    304    556    43    1983    06/07    25 years  

Longview, TX

  —      271    431    —      —      271    431    702    51    1990    06/07    30 years  

Mabank, TX

  —      229    494    —      —      229    494    723    70    1986    06/07    25 years  

Mt. Vernon, TX

  —      292    666    —      —      292    666    958    94    1990    06/07    25 years  

Shreveport, LA

  —      361    250    —      —      361    250    611    59    1969    06/07    15 years  

Tyler, TX

  —      302    455    —      —      302    455    757    81    1981    06/07    20 years  

Tyler, TX

  —      316    545    —      —      316    545    861    64    1989    06/07    30 years  

Tyler, TX

  —      258    419    —      —      258    419    677    74    1978    06/07    20 years  

Tyler, TX

  —      542    403    —      —      481    403    884    57    1984    06/07    25 years  

Tyler, TX

  —      323    283    —      —      323    283    606    50    1978    06/07    20 years  

Tyler, TX

  —      488    831    —      —      488    831    1,319    147    1980    06/07    20 years  

Tyler, TX

  —      256    542    —      —      256    542    798    96    1980    06/07    20 years  

Tyler, TX

  —      742    546    —      —      742    546    1,288    77    1985    06/07    25 years  

Tyler, TX

  —      188    329    —      —      188    329    517    47    1984    06/07    25 years  

Fresenius Medical Care:

            

Houston, TX

  —      422    1,915    —      —      460    1,915    2,375    241    1995    08/06    40 years  

Fresh Market:

            

Gainesville, FL

  —      317    1,248    656    —      317    1,904    2,221    287    1982    03/99    40 years  

Fuel-On:

            

Bloomsburg, PA

  —      541    146    —      —      541    146    687    39    1967    08/05    20 years  

Dallas, PA

  —      677    1,091    —      —      677    1,091    1,768    293    1995    08/05    20 years  

Emporium, PA

  —      380    569    —      —      380    569    949    153    1996    08/05    20 years  

Hazleton, PA

  —      2,529    728    —      —      2,529    728    3,257    196    2001    08/05    20 years  

Johnsonburg, PA

  —      781    504    —      —      781    504    1,285    135    1978    08/05    20 years  

Kane, PA

  —      478    592    —      —      356    —      356    —      1984    08/05    20 years  

Luzerne, PA

  —      171    415    —      —      171    415    586    112    1989    08/05    20 years  

Ridgway, PA

  —      382    259    —      —      382    259    641    70    1975    08/05    20 years  

St. Mary’s, PA

  —      274    261    —      —      274    261    535    70    1979    08/05    20 years  

White Haven, PA

  —      486    867    —      —      486    867    1,353    233    1990    08/05    20 years  

Yeagertown, PA

  —      142    180    —      —      142    180    322    48    1977    08/05    20 years  

Carlisle, PA

  —      170    202    —      —      170    202    372    25    1988    01/06    40 years  

Clairton, PA

  —      215    701    —      —      215    701    916    139    1986    01/06    25 years  

Danville, PA

  —      180    359    —      —      180    359    539    45    1988    01/06    40 years  

Houtzdale, PA

  —      541    500    —      —      356    —      356    —      1977    01/06    15 years  

Minersville, PA

  —      680    582    —      —      680    582    1,262    72    1974    01/06    40 years  

Pittsburgh, PA

  —      905    1,346    —      —      905    1,346    2,251    167    1967    01/06    40 years  

Summerville, PA

  —      93    272    —      —      93    272    365    34    1988    01/06    40 years  

Zelienople, PA

  —      160    437    —      —      160    437    597    54    1988    01/06    40 years  

Furr’s Family Dining:

            

Las Cruces, NM

  —      947    —      2,182    —      947    2,182    3,129    234    2006    01/06 (m)   40 years  

Tucson, AZ

  —      1,116    —      —      —      1,116    (e  1,116    (e  (e  07/06    (e

Moore, OK

  —      939    —      2,429    —      939    2,429    3,368    195    2007    03/07 (m)   40 years  

Arlington, TX

  —      1,061    —      —      —      1,061    (e  1,061    (e  (e  04/10 (m)   (e

Gander Mountain:

            

Amarillo, TX

  —      1,514    5,781    —      —      1,514    5,781    7,295    885    2004    11/04    40 years  

DeForest, WI

  —      2,798    10,953    —      —      2,798    10,953    13,751    91    2008    09/10    35 years  

Springfield, IL

  —      1,717    7,622    —      —      1,717    7,622    9,339    64    2009    09/10    35 years  

Onalaska, WI

  —      1,963    —      —      —      1,963    (e  1,963    (e  (e  10/10 (m)   (e

Ocala, FL

  —      3,315    8,908    —      —      3,315    8,908    12,223    53    2008    10/10    35 years  

Gate Petroleum:

            

Concord, NC

  —      852    1,201    —      —      852    1,201    2,053    166    2001    06/05    40 years  

Rocky Mount, NC

  —      259    1,164    —      —      259    1,164    1,423    161    2000    06/05    40 years  

Gen-X Clothing:

            

Federal Way, WA

  —      2,037    1,662    257    —      2,037    1,919    3,956    567    1994    06/98    40 years  

Golden Corral:

            

Lake Placid, FL

  —      115    305    54    —      115    359    474    246    1985    05/85    35 years  

Brandon, FL

  —      1,188    1,339    —      —      1,188    1,339    2,527    303    1998    12/01    40 years  

Dallas, TX

  —      1,138    1,025    —      —      1,138    1,025    2,163    232    1994    12/01    40 years  

Temple Terrace, FL

  —      1,330    1,391    —      —      1,330    1,391    2,721    314    1997    12/01    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 9


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Goodyear Truck & Tire:

            

Park City, KS

  —      214    687    —      —      214    687    901    190    1989    06/05    20 years  

Anthony, TX

  —      (l  1,242    —      —      (l  1,242    1,242    107    2007    02/07    40 years  

Great Clips:

            

Lapeer, MI

  —      27    194    —      —      27    194    221    16    2007    10/05    40 years  

Green Light Convenience:

            

Moosic, PA

  —      323    309    —      —      323    309    632    83    1980    08/05    20 years  

Guitar Center:

            

Roseville, MN

  —      1,599    1,419    —      —      1,599    1,419    3,018    179    1994    08/06    40 years  

GymKix:

            

Copperas Cove, TX

  —      204    432    171    —      204    603    807    170    1972    11/98    40 years  

H&R Block:

            

Swansea, IL

  —      46    132    69    —      46    201    247    45    1997    12/01    40 years  

Hastings:

            

Nacogdoches, TX

  —      397    1,257    —      —      397    1,257    1,654    381    1997    11/98    40 years  

Havertys Furniture:

            

Clearwater, FL

  —      1,184    2,526    44    —      1,184    2,570    3,754    1,125    1992    05/93    40 years  

Orlando, FL

  —      820    2,441    6    —      820    2,448    3,268    1,001    1992    05/93    40 years  

Pensacola, FL

  —      633    1,595    —      —      603    1,595    2,198    579    1994    06/96    40 years  

Bowie, MD

  —      1,966    4,221    —      —      1,966    4,221    6,187    1,256    1997    12/97    39 years  

Health Source Chiropractic:

            

Houston, TX

  —      112    509    —      —      112    509    621    65    1995    08/06    40 years  

Healthy Pet:

            

Suwanee, GA

  —      175    1,038    —      —      175    1,038    1,213    105    1997    12/06    40 years  

Colonial Heights, VA

  —      160    746    —      —      160    746    906    74    1996    01/07    40 years  

Heilig-Meyers/The Room Store:

            

Baltimore, MD

  —      470    813    —      —      470    813    1,283    246    1968    11/98    40 years  

Glen Burnie, MD

  —      632    932    —      —      632    932    1,564    282    1968    11/98    40 years  

Hog Pit:

            

Tucson, AZ

  —      827    305    18    —      845    305    1,150    79    1974    12/01    40 years  

Hollywood Feed:

            

Ridgeland, MS

  —      343    411    362    —      343    773    1,116    53    1997    08/06    40 years  

Home Decor:

            

Memphis, TN

  —      549    540    364    —      549    904    1,453    247    1998    12/97    40 years  

Home Depot:

            

Sunrise, FL

  —      5,149    —      —      —      5,149    (i  5,149    (i  (i  05/03    (i

HomeGoods:

            

Fairfax, VA

  —      971    756    1,585    —      971    2,341    3,312    552    1995    12/95    40 years  

Hooters:

            

Tampa, FL

  —      784    505    —      —      784    505    1,289    114    1993    12/01    40 years  

Humana:

            

Sunrise, FL

  —      800    253    —      —      800    253    1,053    42    1984    05/04    40 years  

Hy-Vee:

            

St. Joseph, MO

  —      1,580    2,849    —      —      1,580    2,849    4,429    591    1991    09/02    40 years  

Int’l House of Pancakes:

            

Midwest City, OK

  —      407    —      —      —      407    (i  407    (i  (i  11/00    (i

Ankeny, IA

  —      693    515    —      —      693    515    1,208    95    2002    06/05    30 years  

J & J Insurance:

            

Hollywood, FL

  —      195    44    18    —      119    —      119    —      1960    12/05    15 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 10


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Jack in the Box:

            

Plano, TX

  —      1,055    1,237    —      —      1,055    1,237    2,292    171    2001    06/05    40 years  

Jacobson Industrial:

            

Des Moines, IA

  —      61    112    —      —      61    112    173    31    1973    06/05    20 years  

Jared Jewelers:

            

Richmond, VA

  —      955    1,336    —      —      955    1,336    2,291    302    1998    12/01    40 years  

Brandon, FL

  —      1,197    1,182    —      —      1,197    1,182    2,379    255    2001    05/02    40 years  

Lithonia, GA

  —      1,271    1,216    —      —      1,271    1,216    2,487    262    2001    05/02    40 years  

Houston, TX

  —      1,676    1,440    —      —      1,676    1,440    3,116    289    1999    12/02    40 years  

Jazzercise Fitness Center:

            

Orlando, FL

  42 (o)   37    101    —      —      37    101    138    18    2001    02/04    40 years  

Jin’s Asian Cafe:

            

Sealy, TX

  —      67    74    —      —      67    74    141    22    1982    03/99    40 years  

Jo-Ann etc:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      818    896    12    —      818    909    1,727    389    1967    11/93    40 years  

St. Peters, MO

  —      1,741    5,406    —      —      1,741    5,406    7,147    738    2005    06/05 (g)   40 years  

Johnny Carino’s:

            

Lewisville, TX

  —      1,370    1,019    —      —      1,370    1,019    2,389    230    1994    12/01    40 years  

Lubbock, TX

  —      1,007    1,206    —      —      1,007    1,206    2,213    272    1995    12/01    40 years  

S. Beaumont, TX

  —      439    1,363    —      —      439    1,363    1,802    308    2000    12/01    40 years  

Kangaroo Express:

            

Carthage, NC

  —      485    354    —      —      485    354    839    39    1989    08/06    40 years  

Sanford, NC

  —      1,638    1,371    —      —      1,638    1,371    3,009    150    2003    08/06    40 years  

Sanford, NC

  —      666    661    —      —      666    661    1,327    72    2000    08/06    40 years  

Siler City, NC

  —      586    645    —      —      586    645    1,231    71    1998    08/06    40 years  

West End, NC

  —      426    516    —      —      426    516    942    56    1999    08/06    40 years  

Belleview, FL

  —      471    1,451    —      —      471    1,451    1,922    159    2006    08/06    40 years  

Jacksonville, FL

  —      683    1,362    —      —      683    1,362    2,045    149    1969    08/06    40 years  

Jacksonville, FL

  —      807    1,239    —      —      807    1,239    2,046    136    1975    08/06    40 years  

Destin, FL

  —      1,366    1,192    —      —      1,366    1,192    2,558    128    2000    09/06    40 years  

Niceville, FL (n)

  —      1,434    1,124    —      —      1,434    1,124    2,558    121    2000    09/06    40 years  

Kill Devil Hills, NC

  —      490    741    —      —      490    741    1,231    78    1995    10/06    40 years  

Kill Devil Hills, NC

  —      679    552    —      —      679    552    1,231    58    1990    10/06    40 years  

Interlachen, FL

  —      519    1,500    —      —      519    1,500    2,019    105    2007    10/06    40 years  

Clarksville, TN

  —      276    955    —      —      276    955    1,231    96    1999    12/06    40 years  

Clarksville, TN

  —      521    710    —      —      521    710    1,231    72    1999    12/06    40 years  

Gallatin, TN

  —      474    757    —      —      474    757    1,231    76    1999    12/06    40 years  

Midland City, AL

  —      729    2,538    —      —      729    2,538    3,267    256    2006    12/06    40 years  

Naples, FL

  —      3,195    1,403    —      —      3,195    1,403    4,598    142    2001    12/06    40 years  

Oxford, MS

  —      440    1,097    —      —      440    1,097    1,537    111    1998    12/06    40 years  

Columbiana, AL

  —      771    989    —      —      771    989    1,760    98    1982    01/07    40 years  

Naples, FL

  —      3,162    1,597    —      —      3,162    1,597    4,759    155    1995    02/07    40 years  

Longs, SC

  —      745    758    —      —      745    758    1,503    72    2001    03/07    40 years  

Kentwood, LA

  —      985    891    —      —      985    891    1,876    84    2001    03/07    40 years  

Dothan, AL

  —      774    1,886    —      —      774    1,886    2,660    179    2007    03/07    40 years  

Naples, FL

  —      2,412    1,589    —      —      2,412    1,589    4,001    144    2000    05/07    40 years  

Montgomery, AL

  —      666    1,185    —      —      666    1,185    1,851    105    1998    06/07    40 years  

Cary, NC

  —      1,314    2,125    —      —      1,314    2,125    3,439    179    2007    08/07    40 years  

Kash n’ Karry:

            

Seffner, FL

  —      322    1,222    —      —      322    1,222    1,544    220    1983    03/99    40 years  

Keg Steakhouse:

            

Lynnwood, WA

  —      1,256    649    —      —      1,256    649    1,905    147    1992    12/01    40 years  

Tacoma, WA

  —      527    795    —      —      527    795    1,322    180    1981    12/01    40 years  

KFC:

            

Fenton, MO

  —      307    496    —      —      307    496    803    279    1985    07/92    33 years  

Erie, PA

  —      517    496    —      —      517    496    1,013    112    1996    12/01    40 years  

Marysville, WA

  —      647    546    —      —      647    546    1,193    123    1996    12/01    40 years  

Evansville, IN

  —      370    767    —      —      370    767    1,137    89    2004    05/06    40 years  

Kohl’s:

            

Florence, AL

  —      818    1,047    —      —      818    1,047    1,865    111    2006    06/04    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 11


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Kum & Go:

            

Omaha, NE

  —      393    214    —      —      393    214    607    59    1979    06/05    20 years  

Kwik Pik:

            

Bradford, PA

  —      184    762    —      —      184    762    946    205    1983    08/05    20 years  

Coraopolis, PA (n)

  —      476    347    —      —      476    347    823    93    1983    08/05    20 years  

St Clair, PA

  —      212    475    —      —      212    475    687    128    1984    08/05    20 years  

Beech Creek, PA

  —      477    613    —      —      477    613    1,090    76    1988    01/06    40 years  

Canisteo, NY

  —      142    485    —      —      142    485    627    60    1983    01/06    40 years  

Curwensville, PA

  —      226    608    —      —      226    608    834    75    1983    01/06    40 years  

Ellwood City, PA

  —      196    526    —      —      196    526    722    65    1987    01/06    40 years  

Hastings, PA

  —      199    455    —      —      199    455    654    56    1989    01/06    40 years  

Jersey Shore, PA

  —      515    381    —      —      515    381    896    47    1960    01/06    40 years  

Leeper, PA

  —      286    644    —      —      286    644    930    80    1987    01/06    40 years  

Lewisberry, PA

  —      412    534    —      —      412    534    946    66    1988    01/06    40 years  

Mercersburg, PA

  —      672    746    —      —      672    746    1,418    93    1988    01/06    40 years  

New Florence, PA

  —      298    812    —      —      298    812    1,110    101    1989    01/06    40 years  

Newstead, NY

  —      255    835    —      —      255    835    1,090    104    1990    01/06    40 years  

Philipsburg, PA

  —      428    269    —      —      428    269    697    33    1978    01/06    40 years  

Plainfield, PA

  —      244    383    —      —      244    383    627    47    1988    01/06    40 years  

Reynoldsville, PA

  —      113    328    —      —      113    328    441    41    1983    01/06    40 years  

Port Royal, PA

  —      238    635    —      —      238    635    873    142    1989    07/06    20 years  

LA Fitness:

            

Centerville, OH

  —      2,700    —      8,572    —      2,700    8,572    11,272    330    2009    06/08 (m)   40 years  

Warren, MI

  —      2,360    6,674    —      —      2,360    6,674    9,034    299    2009    07/08 (m)   40 years  

Cincinnati, OH

  —      5,145    —      9,011    —      5,145    9,011    14,156    347    2009    08/08 (m)   40 years  

Lawrence, IN

  —      1,604    5,867    —      —      1,604    5,867    7,471    55    2010    01/10 (m)   40 years  

Laveen, AZ

  —      1,665    —      —      —      1,665    (e  1,665    (e  (e  02/10 (m)   (e

Kennesaw, GA

  —      3,653    —      —      —      3,653    (e  3,653    (e  (e  07/10 (m)   (e

Las Margaritas:

            

Indianapolis, IN

  —      640    1,107    —      —      640    1,107    1,747    239    1996    12/01    40 years  

Lil’ Champ:

            

Gainesville, FL

  —      900    —      1,800    —      900    1,800    2,700    171    2006    07/05 (m)   40 years  

Jacksonville, FL

  —      2,225    3,265    —      —      2,225    3,265    5,490    211    2006    08/05    40 years  

Ocala, FL

  —      846    —      1,564    —      846    1,564    2,410    138    2006    02/06 (m)   40 years  

Logan’s Roadhouse:

            

Alexandria, LA

  —      1,218    3,049    —      —      1,218    3,049    4,267    314    1998    11/06    40 years  

Beckley, WV

  —      1,396    2,405    —      —      1,396    2,405    3,801    248    2006    11/06    40 years  

Cookeville, TN

  —      1,262    2,271    —      —      1,262    2,271    3,533    234    1997    11/06    40 years  

Fort Wayne, IN

  —      1,274    2,110    —      —      1,172    2,110    3,282    218    2003    11/06    40 years  

Greenwood, IN

  —      1,341    2,105    —      —      1,341    2,105    3,446    217    2000    11/06    40 years  

Hurst, TX

  —      1,858    1,916    —      —      1,858    1,916    3,774    198    1999    11/06    40 years  

Jackson, TN

  —      1,200    2,246    —      —      1,200    2,246    3,446    232    1994    11/06    40 years  

Lake Charles, LA

  —      1,285    2,202    —      —      1,285    2,202    3,487    227    1998    11/06    40 years  

McAllen, TX

  —      1,608    2,178    —      —      1,608    2,178    3,786    225    2005    11/06    40 years  

Opelika, AL

  —      1,028    1,753    —      —      1,028    1,753    2,781    181    2005    11/06    40 years  

Roanoke, VA

  —      2,302    1,947    —      —      2,302    1,947    4,249    201    1998    11/06    40 years  

San Marcos, TX

  —      837    1,453    —      —      837    1,453    2,290    150    2000    11/06    40 years  

Sanford, FL

  —      1,678    1,730    —      —      1,678    1,730    3,408    178    1999    11/06    40 years  

Smyrna, TN

  —      1,335    2,047    —      —      1,335    2,047    3,382    211    2002    11/06    40 years  

Warner Robins, GA

  —      905    1,534    —      —      905    1,534    2,439    158    2004    11/06    40 years  

Franklin, TN

  —      2,519    1,705    —      —      2,519    1,705    4,224    172    1995    12/06    40 years  

Southhaven, MS

  —      1,298    1,338    —      —      1,298    1,338    2,636    135    2005    12/06    40 years  

Columbus, MS

  —      707    —      —      —      707    (e  707    (e  (e  11/10 (m)   (e

Lancaster, TX

  —      987    —      —      —      987    (e  987    (e  (e  12/10 (m)   (e

Lowe’s:

            

Memphis, TN

  —      3,215    9,170    24    —      3,215    9,194    12,409    1,960    2001    06/02    40 years  

M & T Bank:

            

Carlisle, PA

  —      87    103    —      —      87    103    190    13    1988    01/06    40 years  

Magic China Café:

            

Orlando, FL

  47 (o)   40    111    —      —      40    111    151    19    2001    02/04    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 12


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Magic Mountain:

            

Columbus, OH

  —      5,380    2,693    —      —      5,380    2,693    8,073    238    1990    06/07    40 years  

Columbus, OH

  —      2,076    1,906    —      —      2,076    1,906    3,982    169    1990    06/07    40 years  

Majestic Liquors:

            

Coffee City, TX

  —      1,330    3,858    —      —      1,330    3,858    5,188    567    1996    02/05    40 years  

Ft. Worth, TX

  —      988    2,368    —      —      988    2,368    3,356    348    1997    02/05    40 years  

Ft. Worth, TX

  —      1,652    2,018    —      —      1,652    2,018    3,670    296    2000    02/05    40 years  

Ft. Worth, TX

  —      2,505    2,138    —      —      2,505    2,138    4,643    314    1988    02/05    40 years  

Ft. Worth, TX

  —      611    1,609    —      —      579    1,609    2,188    236    1974    02/05    40 years  

Hudson Oaks, TX

  —      361    1,029    —      —      361    1,029    1,390    151    1993    02/05    40 years  

Granbury, TX

  —      786    1,234    —      —      786    1,234    2,020    148    2006    05/05 (g)   40 years  

Azle, TX

  —      648    859    —      —      648    859    1,507    76    1970    06/07    40 years  

Ft. Worth, TX

  —      575    933    —      —      575    933    1,508    83    1982    06/07    40 years  

Mattress Firm:

            

Baton Rouge, LA

  —      609    914    —      —      609    914    1,523    343    1995    12/95    40 years  

MC Sports:

            

Lapeer, MI

  —      408    2,086    —      —      408    2,086    2,494    172    2007    10/05    40 years  

Merchant’s Tires:

            

Hampton, VA

  —      180    427    —      —      180    427    607    62    1986    03/05    40 years  

Newport News, VA

  —      234    259    —      —      234    259    493    38    1986    03/05    40 years  

Norfolk, VA

  —      398    508    —      —      398    508    906    74    1986    03/05    40 years  

Rockville, MD

  —      1,030    306    —      —      1,030    306    1,336    44    1974    03/05    40 years  

Washington, DC

  —      624    578    —      —      624    578    1,202    84    1983    03/05    40 years  

Mi Pueblo Foods:

            

Palo Alto, CA

  —      2,272    3,405    28    —      2,272    3,433    5,705    1,004    1998    12/98 (f)   40 years  

Michaels:

            

Fairfax, VA

  —      992    773    1,369    —      992    2,141    3,133    527    1995    12/95    40 years  

Grapevine, TX (n)

  —      1,018    2,067    —      —      1,018    2,067    3,085    648    1998    06/98    40 years  

Plymouth Meeting, PA

  —      2,911    2,595    —      —      2,911    2,595    5,506    696    1999    10/98 (g)   40 years  

Michael’s Family Restaurant:

            

Sherman, TX

  —      233    126    24    —      233    150    383    29    1969    09/06    20 years  

Mister Car Wash:

            

Anoka, MN

  —      212    214    —      —      212    214    426    53    1968    04/07    15 years  

Brooklyn Park, MN

  —      438    778    —      —      438    778    1,216    115    1985    04/07    25 years  

Cedar Rapids, IA

  —      391    816    —      —      391    816    1,207    121    1989    04/07    25 years  

Clive, IA

  —      1,141    935    —      —      1,141    935    2,076    173    1983    04/07    20 years  

Cottage Grove, MN

  —      274    485    —      —      274    485    759    72    1992    04/07    25 years  

Des Moines, IA

  —      249    596    —      —      249    596    845    74    1990    04/07    30 years  

Des Moines, IA

  —      213    476    —      —      213    476    689    88    1964    04/07    20 years  

Eden Prairie, MN

  —      865    751    —      —      865    751    1,616    139    1984    04/07    20 years  

Edina, MN

  —      894    687    —      —      894    687    1,581    127    1985    04/07    20 years  

Houston, TX

  —      1,846    1,592    —      —      1,846    1,592    3,438    236    1983    04/07    25 years  

Houston, TX

  —      624    1,108    —      —      624    1,108    1,732    137    1988    04/07    30 years  

Houston, TX

  —      5,126    1,267    —      —      5,126    1,267    6,393    134    1995    04/07    35 years  

Houston, TX

  —      796    678    —      —      796    678    1,474    101    1986    04/07    25 years  

Houston, TX

  —      1,347    1,702    —      —      1,347    1,702    3,049    210    1984    04/07    30 years  

Houston, TX

  —      1,960    1,145    —      —      1,960    1,145    3,105    170    1983    04/07    25 years  

Houston, TX

  —      3,193    1,305    —      —      3,193    1,305    4,498    138    1995    04/07    35 years  

Houston, TX

  —      288    466    —      —      288    466    754    115    1970    04/07    15 years  

Houston, TX

  —      2,260    1,806    —      —      2,260    1,806    4,066    268    1975    04/07    25 years  

Humble, TX

  —      1,204    1,517    —      —      1,204    1,517    2,721    161    1993    04/07    35 years  

Plymouth, MN

  —      827    182    —      —      827    182    1,009    67    1955    04/07    10 years  

Roseville, MN

  —      861    564    —      —      861    564    1,425    104    1963    04/07    20 years  

Spokane, WA

  —      214    580    —      —      214    580    794    72    1990    04/07    30 years  

Spokane, WA

  —      1,253    1,146    —      —      1,253    1,146    2,399    121    1997    04/07    35 years  

St. Cloud, MN (n)

  —      243    391    —      —      243    391    634    73    1986    04/07    20 years  

Stillwater, MN

  —      289    214    —      —      289    214    503    53    1971    04/07    15 years  

Sugarland, TX

  —      3,789    1,972    —      —      3,789    1,972    5,761    209    1995    04/07    35 years  

West St Paul, MN

  —      836    236    —      —      836    236    1,072    44    1972    04/07    20 years  

Rochester, MN

  —      319    451    —      —      319    451    770    36    1994    10/07    40 years  

Rochester, MN

  —      1,055    2,327    —      —      1,055    2,327    3,382    187    2003    10/07    40 years  

Birmingham, AL

  —      2,378    2,145    —      —      2,378    2,145    4,523    223    1985    11/07    30 years  

Clearwater, FL

  —      825    765    —      —      825    765    1,590    96    1969    11/07    25 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 13


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Mesquite, TX

  —      1,596    2,201    —      —      1,596    2,201    3,797    275    1987    11/07    25 years  

Seminole, FL

  —      2,166    1,496    —      —      2,166    1,496    3,662    156    1985    11/07    30 years  

Tampa, FL

  —      2,993    1,669    —      —      2,993    1,669    4,662    209    1969    11/07    25 years  

Vestavia Hills, AL

  —      1,009    956    —      —      1,009    956    1,965    119    1967    11/07    25 years  

El Paso, TX

  —      1,424    1,306    —      —      1,424    1,306    2,730    132    1986    12/07    30 years  

El Paso, TX

  —      988    1,046    —      —      988    1,046    2,034    80    1998    12/07    40 years  

El Paso, TX

  —      1,399    1,468    —      —      1,399    1,468    2,867    112    1991    12/07    40 years  

El Paso, TX

  —      664    824    —      —      664    824    1,488    63    1991    12/07    40 years  

El Paso, TX

  —      1,807    2,287    —      —      1,807    2,287    4,094    175    1983    12/07    40 years  

Muchas Gracias Mexican Restaurant:

            

Salem, OR

  —      556    736    —      —      556    736    1,292    166    1996    12/01    40 years  

My Big Fat Greek Restaurant:

            

Tucson, AZ

  —      996    2,742    —      —      996    2,742    3,738    226    2007    12/06 (m)   40 years  

Olathe, KS

  —      525    731    —      —      525    731    1,256    6    2005    09/10    35 years  

Nitlantika:

            

Hollywood, FL

  —      383    88    37    —      234    —      234    —      1960    12/05    15 years  

Office Depot:

            

Arlington, TX

  —      596    1,411    —      —      596    1,411    2,007    597    1994    01/94    40 years  

Richmond, VA

  —      889    1,948    —      —      889    1,948    2,837    710    1996    05/96    40 years  

Hartsdale, NY

  —      4,509    2,454    —      —      4,509    2,454    6,963    408    1996    09/97    40 years  

Gastonia, NC

  —      1,554    2,367    —      —      1,554    2,367    3,921    357    2004    12/04    40 years  

OfficeMax:

            

Cincinnati, OH

  —      543    1,575    —      —      543    1,575    2,118    649    1994    07/94    40 years  

Evanston, IL

  —      1,868    1,758    —      —      1,868    1,758    3,626    684    1995    06/95    40 years  

Altamonte Springs, FL

  —      1,690    3,050    —      —      1,690    3,050    4,740    1,135    1995    01/96    40 years  

Cutler Bay, FL

  —      989    1,479    —      —      989    1,479    2,468    536    1995    06/96    40 years  

Sacramento, CA

  —      1,144    2,961    —      —      1,144    2,961    4,105    1,037    1996    12/96    40 years  

Salinas, CA

  —      1,353    1,829    —      —      1,353    1,829    3,182    635    1995    02/97    40 years  

Redding, CA

  —      667    2,182    —      —      667    2,182    2,849    739    1997    06/97    40 years  

Kelso, WA

  —      868    —      1,806    —      868    1,806    2,674    585    1998    09/97 (g)   40 years  

Lynchburg, VA

  —      562    —      1,851    —      562    1,851    2,413    569    1998    02/98 (m)   40 years  

Leesburg, FL

  —      640    —      1,929    —      640    1,929    2,569    581    1998    08/98 (m)   40 years  

Tigard, OR

  —      1,540    2,247    —      —      1,540    2,247    3,787    681    1995    11/98    40 years  

Griffin, GA

  —      685    —      1,802    —      685    1,802    2,487    527    1999    11/98 (g)   40 years  

Old River Cabinets:

            

Fairfax, VA

  —      194    365    29    —      194    394    588    73    1995    12/95    40 years  

Orlando Metro Gymnastics:

            

Orlando, FL

  —      428    1,345    —      —      428    1,345    1,773    200    2003    01/05    40 years  

Palais Royale:

            

Sealy, TX

  —      457    504    1,634    —      462    2,134    2,596    259    1982    03/99    40 years  

Pantry I Petroleum:

            

Avis, PA

  —      392    326    —      —      392    326    718    88    1976    08/05    20 years  

Howard, PA

  —      136    375    —      —      136    375    511    46    1987    01/06    40 years  

Patriot Fuels:

            

Vinita, OK

  —      72    368    —      —      72    368    440    24    1972    07/09    20 years  

Pennstar Bank:

            

Dallas, PA

  —      214    345    —      —      214    345    559    93    1995    08/05    20 years  

Pep Boys:

            

Chicago, IL

  —      1,077    3,756    —      —      1,077    3,756    4,833    335    1993    11/07    35 years  

Cicero, IL

  —      1,341    3,760    —      —      1,341    3,760    5,101    336    1993    11/07    35 years  

Cornwell Heights, PA

  —      2,058    3,102    —      —      2,058    3,102    5,160    388    1972    11/07    25 years  

East Brunswick, NJ

  —      2,449    5,026    —      —      2,449    5,026    7,475    524    1987    11/07    30 years  

Guayama, PR

  —      1,729    2,732    —      —      1,729    2,131    3,860    70    1998    11/07    33 years  

Jacksonville, FL

  —      810    2,331    —      —      810    2,331    3,141    208    1989    11/07    35 years  

Joliet, IL

  —      1,506    3,727    —      —      1,506    3,727    5,233    333    1993    11/07    35 years  

Lansing, IL

  —      869    3,440    —      —      869    3,440    4,309    307    1993    11/07    35 years  

Las Vegas, NV

  —      1,917    2,530    —      —      1,917    2,530    4,447    226    1989    11/07    35 years  

Marietta, GA

  —      1,311    3,556    —      —      1,311    3,556    4,867    370    1987    11/07    30 years  

Marlton, NJ

  —      1,608    4,142    —      —      1,608    4,142    5,750    431    1983    11/07    30 years  

Philadelphia, PA

  —      1,300    3,830    —      —      1,300    3,830    5,130    342    1995    11/07    35 years  

Quakertown, PA

  —      1,129    3,252    —      —      1,129    3,252    4,381    290    1995    11/07    35 years  

Reading, PA

  —      1,189    3,367    —      —      1,189    2,819    4,008    109    1989    11/07    28 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 14


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Roswell, GA

  —      931    2,732    —      —      931    2,732    3,663    285    2007    11/07    30 years  

Turnersville, NJ

  —      990    3,494    —      —      990    3,494    4,484    364    1986    11/07    30 years  

Houston, TX

  —      734    3,028    —      —      734    3,028    3,762    71    1994    04/10    30 years  

Perkins Restaurant:

            

Des Moines, IA

  —      226    203    —      —      226    203    429    113    1976    06/05    10 years  

Des Moines, IA

  —      270    218    —      —      270    218    488    121    1977    06/05    10 years  

Des Moines, IA

  —      256    136    —      —      256    136    392    75    1976    06/05    10 years  

Newton, IA

  —      354    402    —      —      354    402    756    223    1979    06/05    10 years  

Urbandale, IA

  —      377    581    —      —      377    581    958    161    1979    06/05    20 years  

Pet Paradise:

            

Houston, TX

  —      417    2,306    —      —      417    2,306    2,723    161    2008    03/08    40 years  

Bunnell, FL

  —      316    881    —      —      316    881    1,197    60    1997    04/08    40 years  

Houston, TX

  —      535    —      3,426    —      535    3,426    3,961    146    2009    09/08 (m)   40 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      825    —      3,231    —      825    3,231    4,056    118    2009    11/08 (m)   40 years  

Davie, FL

  —      1,138    1,069    —      —      1,138    1,069    2,207    62    2003    12/08    35 years  

Petco:

            

Grand Forks, ND

  —      307    910    —      —      307    910    1,217    297    1996    12/97    40 years  

Petro Express:

            

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,025    1,605    —      —      1,025    1,605    2,630    198    1986    04/07    30 years  

Belmont, NC

  —      1,508    1,622    —      —      1,508    1,622    3,130    172    2001    04/07    35 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,697    2,419    —      —      1,697    2,419    4,116    224    2005    04/07    40 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,258    1,560    —      —      1,258    1,560    2,818    145    2004    04/07    40 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,810    2,570    —      —      1,810    2,570    4,380    238    2004    04/07    40 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,030    1,725    —      —      1,030    1,725    2,755    213    1983    04/07    30 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,037    1,468    —      —      1,037    1,468    2,505    155    1997    04/07    35 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      2,316    2,064    —      —      2,316    2,064    4,380    219    1996    04/07    35 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,291    1,839    —      —      1,291    1,839    3,130    227    1988    04/07    30 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,340    1,790    —      —      1,340    1,790    3,130    190    1998    04/07    35 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,458    2,047    —      —      1,458    2,047    3,505    253    1987    04/07    30 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,323    870    —      —      1,323    870    2,193    108    1982    04/07    30 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      507    698    —      —      507    698    1,205    129    1967    04/07    20 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      629    876    —      —      629    876    1,505    108    1986    04/07    30 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      429    425    —      —      429    425    854    53    1983    04/07    30 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,778    1,977    —      —      1,778    1,977    3,755    244    1992    04/07    30 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      2,165    1,965    —      —      2,165    1,965    4,130    208    1997    04/07    35 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      2,784    3,720    —      —      2,784    3,720    6,504    394    1998    04/07    35 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,532    1,973    —      —      1,532    1,973    3,505    209    1998    04/07    35 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,293    1,837    —      —      1,293    1,837    3,130    227    1987    04/07    30 years  

Concord, NC

  —      2,144    1,986    —      —      2,144    1,986    4,130    210    2000    04/07    35 years  

Concord, NC

  —      1,828    1,677    —      —      1,828    1,677    3,505    178    2002    04/07    35 years  

Conover, NC

  —      917    1,275    —      —      917    1,275    2,192    135    1999    04/07    35 years  

Cornelius, NC

  —      1,653    2,664    —      —      1,653    2,664    4,317    282    2000    04/07    35 years  

Denver, NC

  —      2,317    1,750    —      —      2,317    1,750    4,067    185    1999    04/07    35 years  

Fort Mill, SC

  —      1,883    1,559    —      —      1,883    1,559    3,442    193    1988    04/07    30 years  

Fort Mill, SC

  —      3,825    2,554    —      —      3,825    2,554    6,379    271    1998    04/07    35 years  

Gastonia, NC

  —      745    760    —      —      745    760    1,505    70    2003    04/07    40 years  

Gastonia, NC

  —      1,070    1,185    —      —      1,070    1,185    2,255    126    1990    04/07    35 years  

Gastonia, NC

  —      965    1,228    —      —      965    1,228    2,193    130    2001    04/07    35 years  

Gastonia, NC

  —      335    545    —      —      335    545    880    50    2000    04/07    40 years  

Hickory, NC

  —      1,975    1,530    —      —      1,975    1,530    3,505    162    2002    04/07    35 years  

Kings
Mountain,

   

           

NC

  —      1,210    982    —      —      1,210    982    2,192    104    1988    04/07    35 years  

Lake Wylie, SC

  —      1,972    1,283    —      —      1,972    1,283    3,255    136    2003    04/07    35 years  

Lake Wylie, SC

  —      1,381    2,061    —      —      1,381    2,061    3,442    218    1998    04/07    35 years  

Lincolnton, NC

  —      723    532    —      —      723    532    1,255    66    1989    04/07    30 years  

Lincolnton, NC

  —      2,359    1,771    —      —      2,359    1,771    4,130    188    2000    04/07    35 years  

Matthews, NC

  —      1,197    1,746    —      —      1,197    1,746    2,943    216    1987    04/07    30 years  

Mineral Springs, NC

  —      678    577    —      —      678    577    1,255    54    2002    04/07    40 years  

Monroe, NC

  —      709    796    —      —      709    796    1,505    84    1999    04/07    35 years  

Monroe, NC

  —      421    834    —      —      421    834    1,255    88    1997    04/07    35 years  

Monroe, NC

  —      857    1,023    —      —      857    1,023    1,880    95    2004    04/07    40 years  

Rock Hill, SC

  —      778    727    —      —      778    727    1,505    90    1990    04/07    30 years  

Rock Hill, SC

  —      2,119    1,886    —      —      2,119    1,886    4,005    200    1998    04/07    35 years  

Rock Hill, SC

  —      3,095    1,910    —      —      3,095    1,910    5,005    202    1999    04/07    35 years  

Statesville, NC

  —      1,886    2,182    —      —      1,886    2,182    4,068    231    1999    04/07    35 years  

Thomasville, NC

  —      994    1,761    —      —      994    1,761    2,755    187    2000    04/07    35 years  

Waxhaw, NC

  —      508    747    —      —      508    747    1,255    69    2002    04/07    40 years  

York, SC

  —      2,306    1,449    —      —      2,306    1,449    3,755    154    1999    04/07    35 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,231    1,214    —      —      1,231    1,214    2,445    110    1997    05/07    40 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      1,849    2,280    —      —      1,849    2,280    4,129    207    2005    05/07    40 years  

Rock Hill, SC

  —      3,108    2,146    —      —      3,108    2,146    5,254    194    1999    05/07    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 15


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

PetSmart:

            

Chicago, IL

  —      2,724    3,566    —      —      2,724    3,566    6,290    1,096    1998    09/98    40 years  

Pier I Imports:

            

Anchorage, AK

  —      928    1,663    —      —      928    1,663    2,591    617    1995    02/96    40 years  

Memphis, TN

  —      713    822    —      —      713    822    1,535    278    1997    09/96 (f)   40 years  

Sanford, FL

  —      738    803    —      —      738    803    1,541    257    1998    06/97 (f)   40 years  

Valdosta, GA

  —      391    806    —      —      391    806    1,197    224    1999    01/99 (f)   40 years  

Pizza Hut:

            

Monroeville, AL

  —      547    44    —      —      547    44    591    10    1976    12/01    40 years  

Popeye’s:

            

Snellville, GA

  —      642    437    —      —      642    437    1,079    99    1995    12/01    40 years  

Pro Tip Nails & Spa:

            

Orlando, FL

  47 (o)   40    111    —      —      40    111    151    —      2001    02/04    40 years  

Pull-A-Part:

            

Augusta, GA

  —      1,414    —      1,451    —      1,414    1,451    2,865    128    2007    08/06 (m)   40 years  

Birmingham, AL

  —      1,165    2,090    —      —      1,165    2,090    3,255    229    1964    08/06    40 years  

Charlotte, NC

  —      2,913    1,724    —      —      2,913    1,724    4,637    189    2006    08/06    40 years  

Conley, GA

  —      1,686    1,387    —      —      1,686    1,387    3,073    152    1999    08/06    40 years  

Harvey, LA

  —      1,887    —      4,326    —      1,887    4,326    6,213    266    2008    08/06 (m)   40 years  

Knoxville, TN

  —      961    2,384    —      —      961    2,384    3,345    206    2007    08/06 (m)   40 years  

Louisville, KY

  —      3,206    1,532    —      —      3,206    1,532    4,738    168    2006    08/06    40 years  

Nashville, TN

  —      2,164    1,414    —      —      2,164    1,414    3,578    155    2006    08/06    40 years  

Norcross, GA

  —      1,831    1,040    —      —      1,831    1,040    2,871    114    1998    08/06    40 years  

Cleveland, OH

  —      4,556    —      2,096    —      4,556    2,096    6,652    164    2007    08/06 (m)   40 years  

Lafayette, LA

  —      1,036    —      2,226    —      1,036    2,226    3,262    169    2007    08/06 (m)   40 years  

Montgomery, AL

  —      934    —      2,013    —      934    2,013    2,947    157    2007    11/06 (m)   40 years  

Jackson, MS

  —      1,315    2,471    —      —      1,315    2,471    3,786    162    2008    12/06 (m)   40 years  

Baton Rouge, LA

  —      893    —      3,256    —      893    3,256    4,149    146    2009    01/07 (m)   40 years  

Memphis, TN

  —      1,779    —      2,964    —      1,779    2,964    4,743    195    2008    05/07 (m)   40 years  

Mobile, AL

  —      550    —      2,772    —      550    2,772    3,322    136    2009    06/07 (m)   40 years  

Winston-Salem, NC

  —      846    —      2,449    —      846    2,449    3,295    125    2009    08/07 (m)   40 years  

Lithonia, GA

  —      2,410    —      2,345    —      2,410    2,345    4,755    115    2009    08/07 (m)   40 years  

Columbia, SC

  —      935    2,178    —      —      935    2,178    3,113    107    2009    09/07 (m)   40 years  

Akron, OH

  —      1,065    —      1,869    —      1,065    1,869    2,934    53    2009    10/08 (m)   40 years  

QuikTrip:

            

Alpharetta, GA

  —      1,048    607    —      —      1,048    607    1,655    84    1996    06/05    40 years  

Clive, IA

  —      623    557    —      —      623    557    1,180    103    1994    06/05    30 years  

Des Moines, IA

  —      379    455    —      —      379    455    834    84    1990    06/05    30 years  

Des Moines, IA

  —      259    792    —      —      259    792    1,051    146    1996    06/05    30 years  

Gainesville, GA

  —      592    913    —      —      592    913    1,505    169    1989    06/05    30 years  

Herculaneum, MO

  —      856    1,613    —      —      856    1,613    2,469    298    1991    06/05    30 years  

Johnston, IA

  —      394    385    —      —      394    385    779    71    1991    06/05    30 years  

Lee’s Summit, MO

  —      374    1,224    —      —      374    1,224    1,598    170    1999    06/05    40 years  

Norcross, GA

  —      844    297    —      —      839    297    1,136    55    1994    06/05    30 years  

Norcross, GA

  —      948    294    —      —      948    294    1,242    54    1989    06/05    30 years  

Norcross, GA

  —      966    202    —      —      966    202    1,168    37    1993    06/05    30 years  

Olathe, KS

  —      793    1,392    —      —      793    1,392    2,185    193    1999    06/05    40 years  

Tulsa, OK

  —      1,225    650    —      —      1,225    650    1,875    120    1990    06/05    30 years  

Urbandale, IA

  —      340    764    —      —      340    764    1,104    106    1993    06/05    40 years  

Wichita, KS

  —      118    454    —      —      113    454    567    84    1989    06/05    30 years  

Wichita, KS

  —      127    543    —      —      127    543    670    100    1990    06/05    30 years  

Woodstock, GA

  —      488    1,042    —      —      488    1,042    1,530    144    1997    06/05    40 years  

Qwest Corporation Service Center:

            

Cedar Rapids, IA

  —      184    629    —      —      184    629    813    174    1976    06/05    20 years  

Decorah, IA

  —      72    272    —      —      72    272    344    151    1974    06/05    10 years  

Rallys:

            

Toledo, OH

  —      126    320    —      —      126    320    446    153    1989    07/92    39 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 16


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost to  Subsequent to  

Gross Amount at Which

           Life on Which 
     Company  Acquisition  Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)           Depreciation & 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

RBC Bank:

            

Altamonte Springs, FL

  —      1,316    2,014    —      —      1,316    2,014    3,330    36    2007    05/10    35 years  

REB Oil:

            

Deerfield Beach, FL

  —      770    274    —      —      770    274    1,044    35    1980    12/05    40 years  

Lake Placid, FL

  —      2,532    1,157    491    —      2,532    1,648    4,180    188    1990    12/05    40 years  

Regal Theatre:

            

Bolingbrook, IL

  —      2,937    3,032    —      —      2,937    3,032    5,969    333    1994    09/07    30 years  

Reliable Life Insurance:

            

St. Louis, MO

  —      2,078    13,762    —      —      2,076    13,762    15,838    2,224    1975    05/04    40 years  

Retail Operations (h):

  

           

Bakersfield, CA

  —      3,664    3,709    —      —      3,664    3,709    7,373    296    1994    03/08    35 years  

Bakersfield, CA

  —      3,363    3,288    —      —      3,363    3,288    6,651    230    2002    03/08    40 years  

Bakersfield, CA

  —      2,043    3,520    —      —      2,043    680    2,723    212    1988    03/08    30 years  

Bakersfield, CA

  —      2,564    4,465    2,093    —      2,564    6,558    9,122    416    1988    03/08    30 years  

Bakersfield, CA

  —      2,099    2,011    —      —      1,759    —      1,759    93    1990    03/08    35 years  

Bakersfield, CA

  —      3,346    6,016    —      —      3,346    6,016    9,362    477    1998    03/08    35 years  

Bakersfield, CA

  —      3,303    3,845    —      —      1,978    —      1,978    268    1975    03/08    25 years  

Bakersfield, CA

  —      2,798    5,260    —      —      2,044    —      2,044    263    1997    03/08    35 years  

San Fernando, CA

  —      6,630    2,706    —      —      6,630    2,706    9,336    257    1988    03/08    30 years  

Ventura, CA

  —      6,253    4,560    207    —      6,253    4,767    11,020    367    1994    03/08    35 years  

Ventura, CA

  —      5,590    4,431    94    —      5,590    4,526    10,116    311    2001    03/08    40 years  

Rite Aid:

            

Douglasville, GA

  —      413    995    —      —      413    995    1,408    371    1996    01/96    40 years  

Conyers, GA

  —      575    999    —      —      575    999    1,574    338    1997    06/97    40 years  

Augusta, GA

  —      569    1,327    —      —      502    1,327    1,829    433    1997    12/97    40 years  

Riverdale, GA

  —      1,089    1,707    —      —      1,089    1,707    2,796    557    1997    12/97    40 years  

Warner Robins, GA

  —      707    —      1,227    —      707    1,227    1,934    367    1999    03/98 (g)   40 years  

Mobile, AL

  —      1,137    1,694    —      —      1,137    1,694    2,831    383    2000    12/01    40 years  

Orange Beach, AL

  —      1,410    1,996    —      —      1,410    1,996    3,406    451    2000    12/01    40 years  

Norfolk, VA

  —      2,742    1,797    —      —      2,742    1,797    4,539    399    2001    02/02    40 years  

Thorndale, PA

  —      2,261    2,472    —      —      2,261    2,472    4,733    548    2001    02/02    40 years  

West Mifflin, PA

  —      1,402    2,044    —      —      1,402    2,044    3,446    453    1999    02/02    40 years  

Albany, NY

  —      25    867    —      —      25    867    892    136    1994    09/04    40 years  

Saratoga Springs, NY

  —      762    591    30    —      762    621    1,383    93    1993    09/04    40 years  

Monticello, NY

  624    664    769    —      —      664    769    1,433    111    1996    03/05    40 years  

Rite Rug:

            

Columbus, OH

  —      1,596    934    13    —      1,605    939    2,544    144    1970    11/04    40 years  

Road Ranger:

            

Springfield, IL

  —      705    1,500    —      —      705    1,500    2,205    170    1997    06/06    40 years  

Belvidere, IL

  —      748    1,256    —      —      1,098    1,256    2,354    143    1997    06/06    40 years  

Brazil, IN

  —      2,199    907    —      —      2,199    907    3,106    103    1990    06/06    40 years  

Cherry Valley, IL

  —      1,409    1,897    —      —      1,409    1,897    3,306    215    1991    06/06    40 years  

Cottage Grove, WI

  —      2,175    1,733    —      —      2,175    1,733    3,908    197    1990    06/06    40 years  

Decatur, IL

  —      815    1,314    —      —      815    1,314    2,129    149    2002    06/06    40 years  

Dekalb, IL

  —      747    1,658    —      —      747    1,658    2,405    188    2000    06/06    40 years  

Elk Run Heights, IA

  —      1,538    2,470    —      —      1,538    2,470    4,008    280    1989    06/06    40 years  

Lake Station, IN

  —      3,172    1,112    —      —      3,172    1,112    4,284    126    1987    06/06    40 years  

Mendota, IL

  —      959    1,296    —      —      1,214    1,296    2,510    147    1996    06/06    40 years  

Oakdale, WI

  —      1,844    1,663    —      —      1,844    1,663    3,507    189    1998    06/06    40 years  

Rockford, IL

  —      1,094    1,662    —      —      1,094    1,662    2,756    189    1996    06/06    40 years  

Rockford, IL

  —      623    1,331    —      —      623    1,331    1,954    151    2000    06/06    40 years  

Springfield, IL

  —      1,795    1,863    —      —      1,795    1,863    3,658    211    1978    06/06    40 years  

Champaign, IL

  —      3,241    2,008    —      —      3,241    2,008    5,249    194    2006    02/07    40 years  

DeKalb, IL

  —      505    1,503    —      —      505    1,503    2,008    146    2004    02/07    40 years  

Fenton, MO

  —      2,584    2,622    —      —      2,584    2,622    5,206    254    2007    02/07    40 years  

Hampshire, IL

  —      1,307    1,501    1,629    —      1,307    3,130    4,437    272    1988    02/07 (f)   40 years  

Princeton, IL (n)

  —      1,141    3,066    —      —      1,141    3,066    4,207    297    2003    02/07    40 years  

South Beloit, IL

  —      3,824    2,309    —      —      3,824    2,309    6,133    224    2002    02/07    40 years  

Cedar Rapids, IA

  —      1,025    984    —      —      1,025    984    2,009    93    1990    03/07    40 years  

Marion, IA

  —      737    1,071    —      —      737    1,071    1,808    102    1974    03/07    40 years  

Okawville, IL

  —      930    1,147    —      —      930    1,147    2,077    97    1997    08/07    40 years  

Dubuque, IA

  —      561    1,941    —      —      561    1,941    2,502    160    2000    09/07    40 years  

Belvidere, IL

  —      521    1,053    —      —      521    1,053    1,574    82    2008    09/07 (f)   40 years  

South Beloit, IL

  —      1,182    1,324    —      —      1,182    1,324    2,506    103    2008    09/07 (f)   40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 17


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost to  Subsequent to  

Gross Amount at Which

           Life on Which 
     Company  Acquisition  Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)           Depreciation & 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Alexandria, KY

  —      624    1,306    —      —      624    1,306    1,930    101    1993    04/08    35 years  

Covington, KY

  —      486    1,420    —      —      486    1,420    1,906    110    1996    04/08    35 years  

Dry Ridge, KY

  —      892    1,946    —      —      892    1,946    2,838    176    1973    04/08    30 years  

Florence, KY

  —      615    1,242    —      —      615    1,242    1,857    96    1990    04/08    35 years  

Florence, KY

  —      741    1,272    —      —      741    1,272    2,013    98    1994    04/08    35 years  

Florence, KY

  —      884    1,557    —      —      884    1,557    2,441    121    1995    04/08    35 years  

Hebron, KY

  —      1,522    2,984    —      —      1,522    2,984    4,506    231    1996    04/08    35 years  

Wilder, KY

  —      954    1,902    —      —      954    1,902    2,856    147    1994    04/08    35 years  

Robb & Stucky:

            

Ft. Myers, FL

  —      2,188    6,225    —      —      2,188    6,225    8,413    2,052    1997    12/97    40 years  

Roger & Marv’s:

            

Kenosha, WI

  —      1,918    3,431    —      —      1,918    3,431    5,349    1,186    1992    02/97    40 years  

Roni Deutch Tax Services:

            

Hollywood, FL

  —      203    46    19    —      124    —      124    —      1960    12/05    15 years  

Ross Dress for Less:

            

Coral Gables, FL

  —      1,782    1,661    —      —      1,782    1,661    3,443    557    1994    06/96    38 years  

Lodi, CA

  —      614    1,415    —      —      614    1,415    2,029    255    1984    03/99    40 years  

Rue 21:

            

Lapeer, MI

  —      126    645    —      —      126    645    771    53    2007    10/05    40 years  

Sally Beauty Supply:

            

Lapeer, MI

  —      33    167    —      —      33    167    200    14    2007    10/05    40 years  

Saltgrass Steakhouse:

            

Beaumont, TX

  —      553    —      —      —      553    (e  553    (e  (e  09/10 (m)   (e

Schlotzsky’s Deli:

            

Phoenix, AZ

  —      706    315    —      —      706    315    1,021    71    1995    12/01    40 years  

Scottsdale, AZ

  —      717    311    —      —      717    311    1,028    70    1995    12/01    40 years  

Season’s 52:

            

Schaumburg, IL

  —      2,065    1,311    —      —      2,065    1,311    3,376    296    1998    12/01    40 years  

Shek’s Chinese Express:

            

Eden Prairie, MN

  —      65    261    —      —      65    261    326    56    1997    12/01    40 years  

Shoes on a Shoestring:

            

Albuquerque, NM

  —      1,442    2,335    —      —      1,442    2,335    3,777    791    1997    06/97    40 years  

Shop’ n Save:

            

Homestead, PA

  —      1,139    —      2,158 (j)   —      1,139    2,158    3,297    374    1994    02/97    31 years  

Shop-a-Snak:

            

Bessemer, AL

  —      564    742    —      —      564    742    1,306    86    2002    05/06    40 years  

Chelsea, AL

  —      391    628    —      —      391    628    1,019    73    1981    05/06    40 years  

Jasper, AL

  —      551    747    —      —      551    747    1,298    86    1998    05/06    40 years  

Birmingham, AL

  —      490    769    —      —      490    769    1,259    89    1992    05/06    40 years  

Birmingham, AL

  —      361    744    —      —      361    744    1,105    86    1989    05/06    40 years  

Birmingham, AL

  —      446    672    —      —      446    672    1,118    78    1989    05/06    40 years  

Birmingham, AL

  —      439    704    —      —      439    704    1,143    81    1989    05/06    40 years  

Homewood, AL

  —      468    657    —      —      468    657    1,125    76    1990    05/06    40 years  

Hoover, AL

  —      764    1,157    —      —      663    1,157    1,820    134    2005    05/06    40 years  

Hoover, AL

  —      713    865    —      —      713    865    1,578    100    1998    05/06    40 years  

Trussville, AL

  —      272    542    —      —      272    542    814    63    1992    05/06    40 years  

Tuscaloosa, AL

  —      525    463    —      —      525    463    988    54    1991    05/06    40 years  

Tuscaloosa, AL

  —      386    733    —      —      386    733    1,119    85    1991    05/06    40 years  

Tuscaloosa, AL

  —      432    559    —      —      432    559    991    65    1991    05/06    40 years  

SOAKS Express Wash:

            

Ankeny, IA

  —      662    —      —      —      662    (e  662    (e  (e  06/05    (e

Sonic Automotive:

            

Charlotte, NC

  —      3,619    4,854    —      —      3,619    4,854    8,473    440    1996    05/07    40 years  

Spec’s Liquor and Fine Foods:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      777    918    520    —      768    1,438    2,206    407    1967    11/93    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 18


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost to  Subsequent to  

Gross Amount at Which

           Life on Which 
     Company  Acquisition  Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)           Depreciation & 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Spencer’s Air Conditioning & Appliance:

            

Glendale, AZ

  —      342    982    —      —      342    982    1,324    281    1999    12/98 (g)   40 years  

Sports Authority:

            

Tampa, FL

  —      2,128    1,522    —      —      2,128    1,522    3,650    552    1994    06/96    40 years  

Sarasota, FL

  —      1,428    1,703    —      —      1,428    1,703    3,131    294    1988    09/97    40 years  

Memphis, TN (n)

  —      820    —      2,598    —      820    2,598    3,418    786    1998    12/97 (g)   40 years  

Little Rock, AR

  —      3,113    2,660    —      —      3,113    2,660    5,773    817    1997    09/98    40 years  

Iselin, NJ

  —      3,750    5,983    —      —      3,750    5,983    9,733    1,190    1994    01/03    40 years  

Stone Mountain Chevrolet:

            

Lilburn, GA

  —      3,027    4,685    —      —      3,027    4,685    7,712    747    2004    08/04    40 years  

Stop N Go:

            

Grand Prairie, TX

  —      421    685    —      —      421    685    1,106    155    1986    12/01    40 years  

Kennedale, TX

  —      400    692    —      —      391    692    1,083    156    1985    12/01    40 years  

Stripes:

            

Laredo, TX

  —      841    739    —      —      841    739    1,580    93    2001    12/05    40 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      1,843    1,419    —      —      1,843    1,419    3,262    179    2000    12/05    40 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      1,039    1,145    —      —      1,039    1,145    2,184    144    2004    12/05    40 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      2,530    1,125    —      —      2,530    1,125    3,655    142    1990    12/05    40 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      1,182    1,105    —      —      1,182    1,105    2,287    139    2000    12/05    40 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      2,915    1,800    —      —      2,915    1,800    4,715    227    2000    12/05    40 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      1,392    1,444    —      —      1,392    1,444    2,836    182    2005    12/05    40 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      933    699    —      —      933    699    1,632    88    1999    12/05    40 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      1,015    1,308    —      —      1,015    1,308    2,323    165    2003    12/05    40 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      2,033    1,288    —      —      2,033    1,288    3,321    162    1995    12/05    40 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      1,279    1,015    —      —      1,279    1,015    2,294    128    1990    12/05    40 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      2,417    1,828    —      —      2,417    1,828    4,245    230    2000    12/05    40 years  

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      703    1,037    —      —      703    1,037    1,740    131    1986    12/05    40 years  

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      1,308    2,151    —      —      1,308    2,151    3,459    271    1995    12/05    40 years  

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      1,400    1,531    —      —      1,400    1,531    2,931    193    1984    12/05    40 years  

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      853    1,416    —      —      853    1,416    2,269    179    2005    12/05    40 years  

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      1,385    1,419    —      —      1,385    1,419    2,804    179    1982    12/05    40 years  

Donna, TX

  —      1,004    1,127    —      —      1,004    1,127    2,131    142    1995    12/05    40 years  

Edinburg, TX

  —      1,317    1,624    —      —      1,317    1,624    2,941    205    1999    12/05    40 years  

Edinburg, TX

  —      970    1,286    —      —      970    1,286    2,256    162    2003    12/05    40 years  

Falfurias, TX

  —      4,244    4,458    —      —      4,213    4,458    8,671    562    2002    12/05    40 years  

Freer, TX

  —      1,151    1,158    —      —      1,151    1,158    2,309    146    1984    12/05    40 years  

George West, TX

  —      1,243    695    —      —      1,243    695    1,938    88    1996    12/05    40 years  

Harlingen, TX

  —      755    601    —      —      755    601    1,356    76    1987    12/05    40 years  

Harlingen, TX

  —      754    1,152    —      —      754    1,152    1,906    145    1999    12/05    40 years  

Harlingen, TX

  —      906    953    —      —      906    953    1,859    120    1991    12/05    40 years  

La Feria, TX

  —      900    1,347    —      —      900    1,347    2,247    170    1988    12/05    40 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      736    670    —      —      736    670    1,406    84    1984    12/05    40 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      675    533    —      —      675    533    1,208    67    1993    12/05    40 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      1,553    1,775    —      —      1,553    1,775    3,328    224    2000    12/05    40 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      459    460    —      —      459    460    919    58    1983    12/05    40 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      1,495    1,400    —      —      1,495    1,400    2,895    177    1993    12/05    40 years  

Lawton, OK

  —      697    964    —      —      697    964    1,661    122    1984    12/05    40 years  

Los Indios, TX

  —      1,387    1,457    —      —      1,387    1,457    2,844    184    2005    12/05    40 years  

McAllen, TX

  —      975    1,030    —      —      975    1,030    2,005    130    2003    12/05    40 years  

McAllen, TX

  —      987    893    —      —      987    893    1,880    113    1999    12/05    40 years  

Mission, TX

  —      1,125    1,213    —      —      1,125    1,213    2,338    153    2003    12/05    40 years  

Mission, TX

  —      880    1,101    —      —      880    1,101    1,981    139    1999    12/05    40 years  

Olmito, TX

  —      3,688    2,880    —      —      3,688    2,880    6,568    363    2002    12/05    40 years  

Pharr, TX

  —      784    805    —      —      784    805    1,589    101    2000    12/05    40 years  

Pharr, TX

  —      2,426    1,881    —      —      2,426    1,881    4,307    237    2003    12/05    40 years  

Pharr, TX

  —      982    1,178    —      —      982    1,178    2,160    148    1988    12/05    40 years  

Port Isabel, TX

  —      2,062    1,299    —      —      2,062    1,299    3,361    164    1994    12/05    40 years  

Portland, TX

  —      656    915    —      —      656    915    1,571    115    1983    12/05    40 years  

Progreso, TX

  —      1,769    1,811    —      —      1,769    1,811    3,580    228    1999    12/05    40 years  

Riviera, TX

  —      2,351    2,158    —      —      2,351    2,158    4,509    272    2005    12/05    40 years  

San Benito, TX

  —      791    1,857    —      —      791    1,857    2,648    234    1994    12/05    40 years  

San Benito, TX

  —      1,103    1,586    —      —      1,103    1,586    2,689    200    2005    12/05    40 years  

San Juan, TX

  —      1,424    1,546    —      —      1,424    1,546    2,970    195    2004    12/05    40 years  

San Juan, TX

  —      1,124    1,172    —      —      1,124    1,172    2,296    148    1996    12/05    40 years  

South Padre Island, TX

  —      1,367    1,389    —      —      1,367    1,389    2,756    175    1988    12/05    40 years  

Wichita Falls, TX

  —      440    751    —      —      440    751    1,191    95    1984    12/05    40 years  

Wichita Falls, TX

  —      905    1,351    —      —      905    1,351    2,256    170    2000    12/05    40 years  

Wichita Falls, TX

  —      484    828    —      —      484    828    1,312    104    1983    12/05    40 years  

Palmview, TX

  —      835    1,372    —      —      835    1,372    2,207    144    2005    10/06    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 19


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost to  Subsequent to  

Gross Amount at Which

           Life on Which 
     Company  Acquisition  Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)           Depreciation & 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Harlingen, TX

  —      638    1,807    —      —      638    1,807    2,445    183    2006    12/06    40 years  

Rio Grande City, TX

  —      1,871    1,612    —      —      1,871    1,612    3,483    163    2006    12/06    40 years  

San Juan, TX

  —      816    1,434    —      —      816    1,434    2,250    145    2006    12/06    40 years  

Zapata, TX

  —      1,333    1,773    —      —      1,333    1,773    3,106    179    2006    12/06    40 years  

Orange Grove, TX

  —      1,767    1,838    —      —      1,767    1,838    3,605    170    2007    04/07    40 years  

Harlingen, TX

  —      408    826    —      —      408    826    1,234    86    1982    11/07    30 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      698    1,169    —      —      698    1,169    1,867    122    1981    11/07    30 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      448    734    —      —      448    734    1,182    77    1981    11/07    30 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      348    1,168    —      —      348    1,168    1,516    122    1983    11/07    30 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      468    728    —      —      468    728    1,196    76    1973    11/07    30 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      584    958    —      —      584    958    1,542    100    1981    11/07    30 years  

San Benito, TX

  —      420    1,135    —      —      420    1,135    1,555    118    1985    11/07    30 years  

Del Rio, TX

  —      1,565    758    —      —      1,565    758    2,323    59    1996    11/07    40 years  

Kerrville, TX

  —      640    1,616    —      —      640    1,616    2,256    126    1996    11/07    40 years  

Monahans, TX

  —      2,628    2,973    —      —      2,628    2,973    5,601    232    1996    11/07    40 years  

Odessa, TX

  —      2,633    3,199    —      —      2,633    3,199    5,832    250    2006    11/07    40 years  

San Angelo, TX

  —      194    471    —      —      194    471    665    37    1998    11/07    40 years  

Pharr, TX

  —      573    1,229    —      —      573    1,229    1,802    93    2000    12/07    40 years  

Harlingen, TX

  —      329    935    —      —      329    935    1,264    92    1980    01/08    30 years  

Harlingen, TX

  —      277    808    —      —      277    808    1,085    80    1983    01/08    30 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      325    816    —      —      325    816    1,141    80    1983    01/08    30 years  

McAllen, TX

  —      643    1,776    —      —      643    1,776    2,419    175    1980    01/08    30 years  

Port Isabel, TX

  —      299    855    —      —      299    855    1,154    84    1983    01/08    30 years  

Brownsville, TX

  —      843    1,429    —      —      843    1,429    2,272    94    2007    05/08    40 years  

Edinburg, TX

  —      834    1,787    —      —      834    1,787    2,621    117    2007    05/08    40 years  

La Villa, TX

  —      710    2,166    —      —      710    2,166    2,876    142    2007    05/08    40 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      879    1,593    —      —      879    1,593    2,472    105    2007    05/08    40 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      1,183    1,934    —      —      1,183    1,934    3,117    127    2007    05/08    40 years  

McAllen, TX

  —      1,270    2,383    —      —      1,270    2,383    3,653    208    1986    05/08    30 years  

Houston, TX

  —      696    1,458    —      —      696    1,458    2,154    74    2008    12/08    40 years  

Lubbock, TX

  —      671    1,612    —      —      671    1,612    2,283    82    2007    12/08    40 years  

Subway:

            

Eden Prairie, MN

  —      54    150    67    —      54    218    272    47    1997    12/01    40 years  

Albany, NY

  —      3    67    —      —      3    67    70    10    1992    09/04    40 years  

Cohoes, NY

  —      21    116    8    —      21    123    144    18    1994    09/04    40 years  

Sunshine Energy:

            

Kansas City, MO

  —      517    720    —      —      517    720    1,237    42    1993    07/09    25 years  

Neosho, MO

  —      352    —      —      —      352    (c  352    (c  1992    07/09    (c

Superior Petroleum:

            

Midway, PA

  —      311    708    —      —      311    708    1,019    117    1990    01/06    30 years  

Supervalu:

            

Huntington, WV

  —      1,254    761    —      —      1,254    761    2,015    264    1971    02/97    40 years  

Maple Heights, OH

  —      1,035    2,874    —      —      1,035    2,874    3,909    997    1985    02/97    40 years  

Susser:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      630    3,131    —      —      630    3,131    3,761    923    1983    03/99    40 years  

Swansea Quick Cash:

            

Swansea, IL

  —      46    132    —      —      46    132    178    30    1997    12/01    40 years  

Taco Bell:

            

Ocala, FL

  —      275    755    —      —      275    755    1,030    171    2001    12/01    40 years  

Ormond Beach, FL

  —      632    526    —      —      632    526    1,158    119    2001    12/01    40 years  

Phoenix, AZ

  —      594    283    —      —      594    283    877    64    1995    12/01    40 years  

Bedford, IN

  —      797    937    —      —      797    937    1,734    108    1989    05/06    40 years  

Columbus, IN

  —      690    1,213    —      —      690    1,213    1,903    140    2005    05/06    40 years  

Columbus, IN

  —      1,257    2,055    —      —      1,257    2,055    3,312    238    1990    05/06    40 years  

Evansville, IN

  —      524    1,815    —      —      524    1,815    2,339    210    2005    05/06    40 years  

Evansville, IN

  —      221    828    —      —      221    828    1,049    96    2003    05/06    40 years  

Evansville, IN

  —      308    1,301    —      —      308    1,301    1,609    150    2000    05/06    40 years  

Fishers, IN

  —      990    486    —      —      990    486    1,476    56    1998    05/06    40 years  

Greensburg, IN

  —      648    1,079    —      —      648    1,079    1,727    125    1998    05/06    40 years  

Indianapolis, IN

  —      1,032    1,650    —      —      1,032    1,650    2,682    191    2004    05/06    40 years  

Indianapolis, IN

  —      547    703    —      —      547    703    1,250    81    2004    05/06    40 years  

Madisonville, KY

  —      682    1,193    —      —      682    1,193    1,875    138    1999    05/06    40 years  

Ownesboro, KY

  —      639    1,326    —      —      639    1,326    1,965    153    2005    05/06    40 years  

Shelbyville, IN

  —      670    1,756    —      —      670    1,756    2,426    203    1998    05/06    40 years  

Speedway, IN

  —      408    1,426    —      —      408    1,426    1,834    165    2003    05/06    40 years  

Terre Haute, IN

  —      1,037    1,656    —      —      1,037    1,656    2,693    191    2003    05/06    40 years  

Terre Haute, IN

  —      1,314    2,249    —      —      1,314    2,249    3,563    260    2003    05/06    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 20


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost to  Subsequent to  

Gross Amount at Which

           Life on Which 
     Company  Acquisition  Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)           Depreciation & 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Vincennes, IN

  —      502    880    —      —      502    880    1,382    102    2004    05/06    40 years  

Anderson, SC

  —      176    436    —      —      176    436    612    1    2000    12/10    30 years  

Anderson, SC

  —      273    820    —      —      273    820    1,093    1    1989    12/10    25 years  

Asheville, NC

  —      408    732    —      —      408    732    1,140    1    1992    12/10    25 years  

Asheville, NC

  —      252    483    —      —      252    483    735    1    1993    12/10    25 years  

Black Mountain, NC

  —      149    313    —      —      149    313    462    1    1992    12/10    25 years  

Blue Ridge, GA

  —      276    553    —      —      276    553    829    1    1992    12/10    25 years  

Cedartown, GA

  —      353    890    —      —      353    890    1,243    1    1990    12/10    25 years  

Duncan, SC

  —      280    483    —      —      280    483    763    1    1999    12/10    30 years  

Easley, SC (n)

  —      444    818    —      —      444    818    1,262    1    1991    12/10    25 years  

Fort Payne, AL

  —      362    533    —      —      362    533    895    1    1989    12/10    25 years  

Franklin, NC

  —      472    687    —      —      472    687    1,159    1    1992    12/10    25 years  

Gaffney, SC

  —      388    940    —      —      388    940    1,328    1    1998    12/10    30 years  

Greenville, SC

  —      169    330    —      —      169    330    499    1    1990    12/10    25 years  

Greenville, SC

  —      414    810    —      —      414    810    1,224    1    1995    12/10    30 years  

Hendersonville, NC

  —      569    1,163    —      —      569    1,163    1,732    2    1988    12/10    25 years  

Inman, SC

  —      223    502    —      —      223    502    725    1    1999    12/10    30 years  

Lavonia, GA

  —      122    359    —      —      122    359    481    —      1999    12/10    30 years  

Madison, AL

  —      498    886    —      —      498    886    1,384    1    1985    12/10    25 years  

Oneonta, AL

  —      362    881    —      —      362    881    1,243    1    1992    12/10    25 years  

Piedmont, SC

  —      249    702    —      —      249    702    951    1    2000    12/10    30 years  

Pisgah Forest, NC

  —      260    672    —      —      260    672    932    1    1998    12/10    30 years  

Rainsville, AL

  —      411    1,077    —      —      411    1,077    1,488    1    1998    12/10    30 years  

Seneca, SC

  —      304    807    —      —      304    807    1,111    1    1993    12/10    25 years  

Simpsonville, SC

  —      635    1,022    —      —      635    1,022    1,657    2    1991    12/10    25 years  

Spartanburg, SC

  —      239    496    —      —      239    496    735    1    1992    12/10    30 years  

Spartanburg, SC

  —      492    949    —      —      492    949    1,441    1    1993    12/10    30 years  

Sylva, NC

  —      580    786    —      —      580    786    1,366    1    1994    12/10    30 years  

Toccoa, GA

  —      201    600    —      —      201    600    801    1    1993    12/10    30 years  

Waynesville, NC

  —      395    585    —      —      395    585    980    1    1998    12/10    30 years  

Taverna Greek Grill:

            

Farmington, NM

  —      2,757    730    —      —      2,757    730    3,487    48    2003    12/07 (m)   40 years  

Texas Roadhouse:

            

Grand Junction, CO

  —      584    920    —      —      584    920    1,504    208    1997    12/01    40 years  

Thornton, CO

  —      599    1,019    —      —      599    1,019    1,618    230    1998    12/01    40 years  

TGI Friday’s:

            

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      1,210    1,532    —      —      1,210    1,532    2,742    346    1995    12/01    40 years  

Third Federal Savings:

            

Parma, OH

  —      370    238    1,100    —      370    1,338    1,708    135    1977    09/06    20 years  

Thomasville:

            

Buford, GA

  —      1,267    2,406    —      —      1,267    2,406    3,673    388    2004    07/04    40 years  

TitleMax:

            

Aiken, SC

  —      442    646    —      —      442    646    1,088    51    1989    08/08    30 years  

Anniston, AL

  —      160    453    —      —      160    453    613    27    2008    08/08    40 years  

Berkeley, MO

  —      237    282    —      —      237    282    519    33    1961    08/08    20 years  

Cheraw, SC

  —      88    330    —      —      88    330    418    31    1976    08/08    25 years  

Columbia, SC

  —      212    319    —      —      212    319    531    25    1987    08/08    30 years  

Dalton, GA

  —      178    347    —      —      178    347    525    33    1972    08/08    25 years  

Darlington, SC

  —      47    267    —      —      47    267    314    25    1973    08/08    25 years  

Fairfield, AL

  —      133    178    —      —      133    178    311    17    1974    08/08    25 years  

Gadsden, AL

  —      250    389    —      —      250    389    639    23    2007    08/08    40 years  

Hueytown, AL

  —      135    93    —      —      135    93    228    22    1948    08/08    10 years  

Jonesboro, GA

  —      675    292    —      —      675    292    967    28    1970    08/08    25 years  

Lawrenceville, GA

  —      370    332    —      —      370    332    702    26    1986    08/08    30 years  

Lewisburg, TN

  —      70    298    —      —      70    298    368    20    1998    08/08    35 years  

Macon, GA

  —      103    290    —      —      103    290    393    34    1967    08/08    20 years  

Marietta, GA

  —      285    278    —      —      285    278    563    33    1967    08/08    20 years  

Memphis, TN

  —      226    444    —      —      226    444    670    35    1986    08/08    30 years  

Memphis, TN

  —      111    237    —      —      111    237    348    19    1981    08/08    30 years  

Montgomery, AL

  —      96    233    —      —      96    233    329    22    1970    08/08    25 years  

Nashville, TN

  —      268    276    —      —      268    276    544    26    1978    08/08    25 years  

Nashville, TN

  —      256    301    —      —      256    301    557    24    1982    08/08    30 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 21


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost to  Subsequent to  

Gross Amount at Which

           Life on Which 
     Company  Acquisition  Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)           Depreciation & 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Norcross, GA

  —      599    350    —      —      599    350    949    33    1975    08/08    25 years  

Pulaski, TN

  —      109    361    —      —      109    361    470    29    1986    08/08    30 years  

Riverdale, GA

  —      877    400    —      —      877    400    1,277    38    1978    08/08    25 years  

Snellville, GA

  —      565    396    —      —      565    396    961    38    1977    08/08    25 years  

Springfield, MO

  —      125    230    —      —      125    230    355    22    1979    08/08    25 years  

Springfield, MO

  —      220    400    —      —      220    400    620    38    1979    08/08    25 years  

St. Louis, MO

  —      134    398    —      —      134    398    532    27    1993    08/08    35 years  

St. Louis, MO

  —      244    288    —      —      244    288    532    27    1971    08/08    25 years  

Sylacauga, AL

  —      94    191    —      —      94    191    285    15    1986    08/08    30 years  

Taylors, SC

  —      299    372    —      —      299    372    671    25    1999    08/08    35 years  

Tony’s Tires:

            

Montgomery, AL

  —      593    1,187    43    —      593    1,229    1,822    150    1998    08/06    40 years  

Top’s:

            

Lacey, WA

  —      2,777    7,082    —      —      2,777    7,082    9,859    2,457    1992    02/97    40 years  

Tractor Supply Co.:

            

Aransas Pass, TX

  —      101    1,399    200    —      100    1,599    1,699    428    1983    03/99    40 years  

Tully’s:

            

Cheektowaga, NY

  —      689    386    —      —      689    386    1,075    87    1994    12/01    40 years  

Ultra Car Wash:

            

Mobile, AL

  —      1,071    1,086    —      —      1,071    1,086    2,157    92    2005    08/07    40 years  

Lilburn, GA

  —      1,396    1,119    —      —      1,396    1,119    2,515    73    2004    05/08    40 years  

Uni-Mart:

            

Bear Creek, PA

  —      191    230    —      —      191    230    421    62    1980    08/05    20 years  

Chambersburg, PA

  —      76    197    —      —      76    197    273    53    1990    08/05    20 years  

East Brady, PA

  —      269    583    —      —      269    583    852    157    1987    08/05    20 years  

Pleasant Gap, PA

  —      332    593    —      —      332    593    925    159    1996    08/05    20 years  

Port Vue, PA

  —      824    118    —      —      824    118    942    32    1953    08/05    20 years  

Punxsutawney, PA

  —      253    542    —      —      253    542    795    146    1983    08/05    20 years  

Shamokin, PA

  —      324    506    —      —      324    506    830    136    1956    08/05    20 years  

Shippensburg, PA

  —      204    330    —      —      204    330    534    89    1989    08/05    20 years  

Taylor, PA

  —      181    527    —      —      181    527    708    142    1973    08/05    20 years  

Wilkes-Barre, PA

  —      178    471    —      —      178    471    649    127    1989    08/05    20 years  

Wilkes-Barre, PA

  —      876    1,957    —      —      876    1,957    2,833    526    1998    08/05    20 years  

Wilkes-Barre, PA

  —      171    422    —      —      171    422    593    114    1999    08/05    20 years  

Williamsport, PA

  —      909    122    —      —      909    122    1,031    33    1950    08/05    20 years  

Ashland, PA

  —      355    545    —      —      355    545    900    144    1977    09/05    20 years  

Bear Creek, PA (n)

  —      689    275    —      —      689    275    964    73    1980    09/05    20 years  

Mountaintop, PA

  —      423    616    —      —      423    616    1,039    163    1987    09/05    20 years  

Effort, PA

  —      1,297    1,202    —      —      1,297    1,202    2,499    149    2000    01/06    40 years  

Export, PA

  —      222    215    —      —      222    215    437    27    1988    01/06    40 years  

Hughesville, PA

  —      290    566    —      —      290    566    856    70    1977    01/06    40 years  

McSherrystown, PA

  —      135    365    —      —      135    365    500    45    1988    01/06    40 years  

Milesburg, PA

  —      134    373    —      —      134    373    507    46    1987    01/06    40 years  

Nanticoke, PA

  —      175    482    —      —      175    482    657    60    1988    01/06    40 years  

Nuangola, PA

  —      1,062    1,203    —      —      1,062    1,203    2,265    149    2000    01/06    40 years  

Plains, PA

  —      204    401    —      —      204    401    605    50    1994    01/06    40 years  

Punxsutawney, PA

  —      294    650    —      —      294    650    944    81    1983    01/06    40 years  

Williamsport, PA

  —      295    379    —      —      295    379    674    47    1988    01/06    40 years  

Burnham, PA

  —      265    510    —      —      340    435    775    97    1978    07/06    20 years  

United Rentals:

            

Carrollton, TX

  —      478    535    —      —      478    535    1,013    81    1981    12/04    40 years  

Cedar Park, TX

  —      535    829    —      —      535    829    1,364    125    1990    12/04    40 years  

Clearwater, FL

  —      1,173    1,811    —      —      1,173    1,811    2,984    273    2001    12/04    40 years  

Fort Collins, CO

  —      2,057    978    —      —      2,057    978    3,035    148    1975    12/04    40 years  

Irving, TX

  —      708    911    —      —      708    911    1,619    138    1984    12/04    40 years  

La Porte, TX

  —      1,115    2,125    —      —      1,115    2,125    3,240    321    2000    12/04    40 years  

Littleton, CO

  —      1,743    1,944    —      —      1,743    1,944    3,687    294    2002    12/04    40 years  

Oklahoma City, OK

  —      744    1,265    —      —      744    1,265    2,009    191    1997    12/04    40 years  

Perrysburg, OH

  —      642    1,119    —      —      642    1,119    1,761    169    1979    12/04    40 years  

Plano, TX

  —      1,030    1,148    —      —      1,030    1,148    2,178    173    1996    12/04    40 years  

Temple, TX

  —      1,160    1,360    —      —      1,160    1,360    2,520    205    1998    12/04    40 years  

Ft. Worth, TX

  —      510    1,128    —      —      510    1,128    1,638    168    1997    01/05    40 years  

Ft. Worth, TX

  —      1,428    —      —      —      1,428    (i  1,428    (i  (i  01/05    (i

Melbourne, FL

  —      747    607    —      —      747    607    1,354    85    1970    05/05    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 22


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost  to
Company
  Subsequent to
Acquisition
  Gross Amount at Which
Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)
           

Life on Which

Depreciation &

 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

United Trust Bank:

            

Bridgeview, IL

  —      673    744    —      —      673    744    1,417    168    1997    12/01    40 years  

Vacant Land:

            

Florence, AL

  —      1,034    —      —      —      748    (e  748    (e  (e  06/04    (e

Longwood, FL

  —      975    —      —      —      975    (e  975    (e  (e  03/06    (e

Vacant Property:

            

Arlington, TX

  —      435    2,300    334    —      435    2,634    3,069    845    1996    06/96    38 years  

Sarasota, FL

  —      1,168    1,904    219    —      1,168    2,122    3,290    375    1996    09/97    40 years  

Knoxville, TN

  —      467    735    —      —      467    735    1,202    220    1999    01/98 (f)   40 years  

Aransas Pass, TX

  —      90    1,241    —      —      89    1,241    1,330    366    1983    03/99    40 years  

Corpus Christi, TX

  —      224    2,159    —      —      224    2,159    2,383    636    1983    03/99    40 years  

Sarasota, FL

  —      471    1,344    312    —      471    1,656    2,127    243    1983    03/99    40 years  

Sealy, TX

  —      820    905    —      —      820    905    1,725    267    1982    03/99    40 years  

Winfield, AL

  —      420    1,685    —      —      420    1,685    2,105    497    1983    03/99    40 years  

Augusta, GA

  —      177    674    —      —      177    674    851    152    1998    12/01    40 years  

Chandler, AZ

  —      655    791    —      —      655    791    1,446    182    1997    12/01    40 years  

Cincinnati, OH

  —      282    521    279    —      543    539    1,082    119    1998    12/01    40 years  

Clifton, CO

  —      245    732    —      —      245    732    977    166    1998    12/01    40 years  

Columbus, OH

  —      1,032    1,107    —      —      1,032    1,107    2,139    250    1998    12/01    40 years  

Eden Prairie, MN

  —      76    211    94    —      76    305    381    66    1997    12/01    40 years  

Jacksonville, FL

  —      987    856    —      —      794    —      794    170    1996    12/01    40 years  

Mesa, AZ

  —      153    400    —      —      153    400    553    116    1997    12/01    40 years  

Mesa, AZ

  —      43    113    363    —      43    476    519    32    1997    12/01    40 years  

Montgomery, AL

  —      1,418    1,140    —      —      1,418    1,044    2,462    244    1999    12/01    40 years  

Southfield, MI

  —      405    644    —      —      405    644    1,049    167    1976    12/01    40 years  

Swansea, IL

  —      92    265    —      —      92    265    357    60    1997    12/01    40 years  

Florissant, MO

  —      2,490    2,937    —      —      2,490    2,937    5,427    566    1996    04/03    40 years  

Woodstock, GA

  —      1,937    1,285    —      —      1,891    1,016    2,907    210    1997    05/03    40 years  

Buford, GA

  —      1,925    5,035    —      —      1,925    5,035    6,960    813    2003    07/04    40 years  

Cohoes, NY

  —      27    145    9    —      27    154    181    23    1994    09/04    40 years  

Cohoes, NY

  —      46    246    16    —      46    262    308    39    1994    09/04    40 years  

Hudson Falls, NY

  —      57    780    39    —      57    819    876    126    1990    09/04    40 years  

Ticonderoga, NY

  —      89    689    —      —      89    689    778    108    1993    09/04    40 years  

Gastonia, NC

  —      994    1,513    —      —      994    1,513    2,507    229    2004    12/04    40 years  

Dallas, TX

  —      2,407    2,299    —      —      2,407    2,299    4,706    312    1971    06/05    40 years  

Dallas, TX

  —      1,554    1,229    —      —      1,554    1,229    2,783    170    1982    06/05    40 years  

Olean, NY

  —      40    259    —      —      40    259    299    70    1990    08/05    20 years  

Fairview Heights, IL

  —      1,258    2,623    —      —      1,258    2,623    3,881    342    1980    10/05    40 years  

Lapeer, MI

  —      29    211    —      —      29    211    240    18    2007    10/05    40 years  

Lapeer, MI

  —      100    721    —      —      100    721    821    61    2007    10/05    40 years  

Lafayette, LA

  —      603    1,149    —      —      603    1,149    1,752    145    1999    12/05    40 years  

West Palm Beach, FL

  —      619    161    —      —      619    161    780    35    1984    09/06    20 years  

Hillman, MI

  —      167    823    —      —      167    363    530    64    1952    10/06    40 years  

Lithonia, GA

  —      923    1,276    —      —      923    1,276    2,199    113    2002    06/07    40 years  

Lubbock, TX

  —      2,606    2,898    —      —      2,606    2,898    5,504    251    1983    07/07    40 years  

Lubbock, TX

  —      1,293    1,211    —      —      1,293    1,211    2,504    105    1983    07/07    40 years  

Bakersfield, CA

  —      1,643    1,959    —      —      530    —      530    137    1975    03/08    25 years  

Bellingham, WA

  —      1,237    1,260    —      —      1,237    408    1,645    61    1994    06/08    30 years  

Lubbock, TX

  —      943    957    —      —      943    957    1,900    12    1964    11/10    10 years  

Value City Furniture:

            

White Marsh, MD

  —      3,762    —      3,006    —      3,762    3,006    6,768    961    1998    10/97 (g)   40 years  

Vitamin Shoppe, The:

            

Cincinnati, OH

  —      297    443    368    —      297    810    1,107    134    1999    06/98 (f)   40 years  

Walgreens:

            

Sunrise, FL

  —      1,958    1,401    —      —      1,958    1,401    3,359    267    1994    05/03    40 years  

Tulsa, OK

  —      1,193    3,056    —      —      1,193    3,056    4,249    423    2003    06/05    40 years  

Boise, ID

  —      792    1,875    —      —      792    1,875    2,667    49    2000    03/10    30 years  

Nampa, ID

  —      1,062    2,253    —      —      1,062    2,253    3,315    59    2000    03/10    30 years  

Wendy’s:

            

Sacramento, CA

  —      586    —      —      —      586    (i  586    (i  (i  02/98    (i

New Kensington, PA

  —      501    333    —      —      501    333    834    75    1980    12/01    40 years  

Whataburger:

            

Albuquerque, NM

  —      624    419    —      —      624    419    1,043    95    1995    12/01    40 years  

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 23


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost to  Subsequent to  

Gross Amount at Which

           Life on Which 
     Company  Acquisition  Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)           Depreciation & 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Wherehouse Music:

            

Homewood, AL

  —      1,032    697    —      —      1,032    697    1,729    158    1997    12/01    40 years  

Independence, MO

  —      503    1,209    —      —      503    1,209    1,712    152    1994    12/05    40 years  

Wingfoot:

            

Beaverdam, OH

  —      (l  1,521    —      —      (l  1,521    1,521    138    2004    05/07    40 years  

Benton, AR

  —      (l  309    —      —      (l  309    309    27    2001    05/07    40 years  

Bowman, SC

  —      (l  969    —      —      (l  969    969    100    1998    05/07    35 years  

Dalton, GA

  —      (l  1,541    —      —      (l  1,541    1,541    140    2004    05/07    40 years  

Dandridge, TN

  —      (l  1,030    —      —      (l  1,030    1,030    107    1989    05/07    35 years  

Franklin, OH

  —      (l  563    —      —      (l  563    563    58    1998    05/07    35 years  

Gary, IN

  —      (l  1,486    —      —      (l  1,486    1,486    135    2004    05/07    40 years  

Georgetown, KY

  —      (l  679    —      —      (l  679    679    82    1997    05/07    30 years  

Mebane, NC

  —      (l  561    —      —      (l  561    561    58    1998    05/07    35 years  

Piedmont, SC

  —      (l  567    —      —      (l  567    567    59    1999    05/07    35 years  

Port
Wentworth,

   

           

GA

  —      (l  552    —      —      (l  552    552    57    1998    05/07    35 years  

Valdosta, GA

  —      (l  1,477    —      —      (l  1,477    1,477    134    2004    05/07    40 years  

Temple, GA

  —      (l  1,065    —      —      (l  1,065    1,065    83    2007    06/07    40 years  

Whiteland, IN

  —      (l  1,471    —      —      (l  1,471    1,471    127    2004    07/07    40 years  

Des Moines, IA

  —      (l  816    —      —      (l  816    816    71    1987    07/07    40 years  

Robinson, TX

  —      (l  1,183    —      —      (l  1,183    1,183    92    2007    07/07    40 years  

Kearney, MO

  —      (l  1,269    —      —      (l  1,269    1,269    110    2003    07/07    40 years  

Oklahoma City, OK

  —      (l  1,247    —      —      (l  1,247    1,247    90    2008    08/07    40 years  

Amarillo, TX

  —      (l  1,158    —      —      (l  1,158    1,158    74    2008    02/08    40 years  

Jackson, MS

  —      (l  1,281    —      —      (l  1,281    1,281    79    2008    03/08    40 years  

Glendale, KY

  —      (l  1,066    —      —      (l  1,066    1,066    59    2008    07/08    40 years  

Lebanon, TN

  —      (l  1,331    —      —      (l  1,331    1,331    68    2008    08/08    40 years  

Laredo, TX

  —      (l  1,238    —      —      (l  1,238    1,238    55    2009    11/08 (q)   40 years  

Midland, TX

  —      (l  1,148    —      —      (l  1,148    1,148    13    2010    04/10 (q)   40 years  

Tuscaloosa, AL

  —      (l  8    —      —      (l  8    8    —      (q  08/10 (q)   (q

Kenly, NC

  —      (l  —      —      —      (l  —      —      —      (q  11/10 (q)   (q

Winn-Dixie:

            

Columbus, GA

  —      1,023    1,875    —      —      1,023    1,875    2,898    350    1984    07/03    40 years  

Wireless Wizard:

            

Ridgeland, MS

  —      436    523    26    —      436    549    985    66    1997    08/06    40 years  

Your Choice:

            

Hazleton, PA

  —      670    377    —      —      670    377    1,047    101    1974    08/05    20 years  

Montoursville, PA

  —      158    415    13    —      158    428    586    52    1988    01/06    40 years  

Ziebart:

            

Maplewood, MN

  —      308    311    —      —      308    311    619    46    1990    02/05    40 years  

Middleburg Heights, OH

  —      199    148    —      —      199    148    347    22    1961    02/05    40 years  

Zio’s Italian Kitchen:

            

Aurora, CO (n)

  —      1,168    1,105    —      —      1,168    1,105    2,273    210    2000    06/05    30 years  

Leasehold Interests:

            

Lima, OH

  —      1,290    —      —      —      1,290    (e  1,290    1,055    (e  08/01    (e
                                       

SUBTOTAL

  20,524    1,127,836    1,463,619    151,411    —      1,123,517    1,592,756    2,716,273    222,921     
                                       

Real Estate Held for Investment the Company has Invested in Under Direct Financing Leases:

      

           

Barnes & Noble:

            

Plantation, FL

  —      —      3,498    —      —      —      (c  (c  (c  1996    05/95 (f)   (c

Borders:

            

Altamonte Springs, FL

  —      —      3,267    —      —      —      (c  (c  (c  1997    09/97    (c

Checkers:

            

Orlando, FL

  —      —      287    —      —      —      (c  (c  (c  1988    07/92    (c

CVS:

            

San Antonio, TX

  —      —      744    —      —      —      (c  (c  (c  1993    12/93    (c

Amarillo, TX

  —      159    855    —      —      (d  (d  (d  (d  1994    12/94    (d

Lafayette, LA

  —      —      949    —      —      —      (c  (c  (c  1995    01/96    (c

Oklahoma City, OK

  —      (l  1,365    —      —      (l  (c  (c  (c  1997    06/97    (c

Oklahoma City, OK

  —      (l  1,419    —      —      (l  (c  (c  (c  1997    06/97    (c

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 24


Table of Contents
        Costs Capitalized                
     Initial Cost to  Subsequent to  

Gross Amount at Which

           Life on Which 
     Company  Acquisition  Carried at Close of Period (a) (b)           Depreciation & 
        Building,        Building,     Accumulated        Amortization in 
        Improvements &           Improvements &     Depreciation        Latest Income 
  Encumbrances  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Improvements  Carrying
Costs
  Land  Leasehold
Interests
  Total  and
Amortization
  Date  of
Construction
  Date
Acquired
  Statement is
Computed
 

Denny’s:

            

Stockton, CA

  —      940    509    —      —      (d  (d  (d  (d  1982    09/06    (d

Food 4 Less:

            

Chula Vista, CA

  —      —      4,266    —      —      —      (c  (c  (c  1995    11/98    (c

Heilig-Meyers/The Room Store:

            

York, PA

  —      279    1,110    —      —      (d  (d  (d  (d  1997    11/98    (d

Marlow Heights, MD

  —      416    1,397    —      —      (d  (d  (d  (d  1968    11/98    (d

Jared Jewelers:

            

Phoenix, AZ

  215 (k)   (l  1,242    —      —      (l  (c  (c  (c  1998    12/01    (c

Toledo, OH

  —      (l  1,458    —      —      (l  (c  (c  (c  1998    12/01    (c

Oviedo, FL

  364 (k)   (l  1,500    —      —      (l  (c  (c  (c  1998    12/01    (c

Lewisville, TX

  187 (k)   (l  1,503    —      —      (l  (c  (c  (c  1998    12/01    (c

Glendale, AZ

  —      (l  1,599    —      —      (l  (c  (c  (c  1998    12/01    (c

Kash n’ Karry:

            

Valrico, FL

  2,979 (p)   1,235    3,255    —      —      (d  (d  (d  (d  1997    06/02    (d

Rite Aid:

            

Kennett Square, PA

  —      (l  —      1,984    —      (l  (c  (c  (c  2000    12/00    (c

Arlington, VA

  —      (l  3,201    —      —      (l  (c  (c  (c  2000    02/02    (c

Sunshine Energy:

            

Altamont, KS

  —      124    142    —      —      (d  (d  (d  (d  1979    07/09    (d

Chouteau, OK

  —      113    301    —      —      (d  (d  (d  (d  1988    07/09    (d

Neosho, MO

  —      —      775    —      —      —      (c  (c  (c  1992    07/09    (c
                                       

SUBTOTAL

  3,745    3,266    34,642    1,984    —      —      —      —      —       
                                       

Real Estate Held for Sale the Company has Invested in:

    

           

Our Place:

            

North Richland Hills, TX

  —      584    180    184    —      596    342    938    —      1989    02/06    —    

Power Center:

            

Midland, MI

  —      1,085    1,635    —      —      1,085    1,635    2,720    —      2006    05/05 (g)   —    

Elmira, NY

  —      2,248    7,159    —      —      2,248    5,291    7,539    —      2006    08/05 (g)   —    

Topsham, ME

  —      1,885    1,735    —      —      1,885    62    1,947    —      2007    02/06 (g)   —    

Irving, TX

  —      951    1,090    —      —      951    1,063    2,014    —      1987    02/06    —    

Waxahachie, TX

  —      1,249    1,097    —      —      1,249    1,069    2,318    —      1995    02/06    —    

Harlingen, TX

  —      247    807    —      —      247    807    1,054    —      2008    09/06 (g)   —    

Harlingen, TX.

  —      749    1,238    —      —      749    1,238    1,987    —      2008    09/06 (g)   —    

Woodstock, GA

  —      261    701    —      —      261    606    867    —      1997    07/08    —    

Tutor Time:

            

Elk Grove, CA

  —      1,216    2,786    —      —      1,216    2,741    3,957    —      2009    09/08    —    

Vacant Land:

            

Grand Prairie, TX

  —      387    —      —      —      108    —      108    (e  (e  12/02    —    

Topsham, ME

  —      1,034    —      —      —      293    —      293    (e  (e  02/06    —    

Rockwall, TX

  —      900    —      —      —      900    —      900    (e  (e  02/06    —    

Fairfield Township, OH

  —      3,201    —      —      —      1,868    —      1,868    (e  (e  08/06    —    

Bonita Springs, FL

  —      112    —      —      —      25    —      25    (e  (e  09/06    —    

Lancaster, OH

  —      2,135    —      —      —      1,339    —      1,339    (e  (e  01/08    —    

Hadley, MA

  —      2,869    —      —      —      2,091    —      2,091    (e  (e  02/08    —    
                                       

SUBTOTAL

  —      21,113    18,428    184    —      17,111    14,854    31,965    —       
                                       

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 25


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO SCHEDULE III - REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

December 31, 2010

(dollars in thousands)

 

(a)Transactions in real estate and accumulated depreciation during 2010, 2009, and 2008 are summarized as follows:

 

   2010  2009  2008 

Land, buildings, and leasehold interests:

    

Balance at the beginning of year

  $2,584,947   $2,605,288   $2,415,536  

Acquisitions, completed construction and tenant improvements

   248,438    35,924    410,787  

Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests

   (58,438  (21,751  (215,542

Provision for loss on impairment of real estate

   —      (34,514  (5,493
             

Balance at the close of year

  $2,774,947   $2,584,947   $2,605,288  
             

Accumulated depreciation and amortization:

    

Balance at the beginning of year

  $183,949   $146,289   $111,080  

Disposition of land, buildings, and leasehold interests

   (2,071  (3,143  (2,591

Depreciation and amortization expense

   41,043    40,803    37,800  
             

Balance at the close of year

  $222,921   $183,949   $146,289  
             

As of December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, the detailed real estate schedule excludes work in progress of $26,699, $5,634, and $42,253, respectively, which is included in the above reconciliation.

 

(b)As of December 31, 2010, the leases are treated as either operating or financing leases for federal income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2010, the aggregate cost of the properties owned by NNN that are under operating leases were $2,641,832 and financing leases were $4,178.

 

(c)For financial reporting purposes, the portion of the lease relating to the building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.

 

(d)For financial reporting purposes, the lease for the land and building has been recorded as a direct financing lease; therefore, depreciation is not applicable.

 

(e)NNN owns only the land for this property.

 

(f)Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN purchased the buildings from the tenants upon completion of construction, generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.

 

(g)Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. NNN developed the buildings, generally completing construction within 12 months from the acquisition date of the land.

 

(h)In connection with the default of a note receivable and certain lease agreements between NNN and one of NNN’s tenants, in June of 2009, NNN acquired the operations of the auto service business which was operated on certain Investment Properties.

 

(i)NNN owns only the land for this property, which is subject to a ground lease between NNN and the tenant. The tenant funded the improvements on the property.

 

(j)In 2005, there was a lease amendment to this property, resulting in a reclassification from a direct financing lease to an operating lease.

 

(k)NNN owns only the building for this property, which is encumbered by a fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.

 

(l)NNN owns only the building for this property. The land is subject to a ground lease between NNN and an unrelated third party.

 

(m)Date acquired represents acquisition date of land. Pursuant to lease agreement, NNN funds the tenant’s construction draws, final funding occurs generally within 12 months from the acquisition of the land.

 

(n)The tenant of this property has subleased the property. The tenant continues to be responsible for complying with all the terms of the lease agreement and is continuing to pay rent on this property to NNN.

 

(o)Property is encumbered as a part of NNN’s $6,952 long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.

 

(p)Property is encumbered as a part of NNN’s $21,000 long-term, fixed rate mortgage and security agreement.

 

(q)The land is subject to a ground lease between NNN and an unrelated third party. Pursuant to the lease agreement, NNN funds the tenant’s construction draws, final funding occurs generally within 12 months from the execution of the ground lease.

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.

 

F - 26


Table of Contents

NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SCHEDULE IV - MORTGAGE LOANS ON REAL ESTATE

December 31, 2010

(dollars in thousands)

 

Description

  Interest
Rate
  Maturity
Date
   Periodic
Payment
Terms
  Prior
Liens
   Face Amount
of Mortgages
   Carrying
Amount of
Mortgages (f)
  Principal Amount
of Loans Subject
to Delinquent
Principal or
Interest
 

First mortgages on properties:

           

Paramus, NJ

   9.000  2022     (b  —      $6,000    $4,971   $—    

Des Moines, IA

   8.000  2013     (d  —       400     269    —    

Terre Haute, IN

   7.000  2011     (c  —       1,582     1,452    —    

Cleveland, OH

   10.000  2028     (c  —       6,644     6,644    —    

Milford, CT

   8.000  2013     (c  —       1,550     1,550    —    

Hollywood, FL

   6.000  2013     (c  —       450     450    —    

Taylorsville, NC

   9.500  2013     (e  —       352     352    —    

4 properties in FL and GA

   6.250  2014     (c  —       5,500     5,450    —    
                    
        $22,478    $21,138  (a)  $—    
                    

 

(a)The following shows the changes in the carrying amounts of mortgage loans during the years:

 

   2010  2009  2008 

Balance at beginning of year

  $34,707   $35,993   $49,336  

New mortgage loans

   6,302 (g)   2,259 (g)   17,028 (g) 

Deductions during the year:

    

Collections of principal

   (7,148  (3,545  (27,874

Foreclosures

   (12,723  —      (2,497
             

Balance at the close of year

  $21,138   $34,707   $35,993  
             

 

(b)Principal and interest is payable at level amounts over the life of the loan.

 

(c)Interest only payments are due monthly. Principal is due at maturity.

 

(d)Principal and interest is payable at level amounts over the life of the loan with a principal balloon payment at maturity.

 

(e)Principal and interest is payable in full on the earlier of (i) specific events as outlined in the loan agreement, or (ii) maturity date.

 

(f)Mortgages held by NNN and its subsidiaries for federal income tax purposes for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $21,138, $34,707, and $35,993, respectively.

 

(g)Mortgages totaling $6,302, $2,259, and $17,028, were accepted in connection with real estate transactions for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

See accompanying report of independent registered public accounting firm.