Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
OR
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number 001-09279
ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MARYLAND
13-3147497
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. employer
incorporation or organization)
identification number)
60 Cutter Mill Road, Great Neck, New York
11021
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(516) 466-3100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of May 2, 2014, the registrant had 15,978,064 shares of common stock outstanding.
One Liberty Properties, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Page No.
Part I - Financial Information
Item 1.
Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
1
Consolidated Statements of Income Three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
2
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
3
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity Three months ended March 31, 2014 and year ended December 31, 2013
4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
21
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
30
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
Part II - Other Information
Item 6.
Exhibits
31
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ONE LIBERTY PROPERTIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Par Value)
March 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
(Unaudited)
Assets
Real estate investments, at cost
Land
$
155,499
153,529
Buildings and improvements
416,995
413,829
Total real estate investments, at cost
572,494
567,358
Less accumulated depreciation
74,165
71,171
Real estate investments, net
498,329
496,187
Properties held-for-sale
5,177
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures
4,916
4,906
Cash and cash equivalents
16,168
16,631
Unbilled rent receivable
14,079
13,743
Unamortized intangible lease assets
25,771
26,035
Escrow, deposits and other assets and receivables
4,509
5,690
Investment in BRT Realty Trust at market (related party)
264
262
Unamortized deferred financing costs
3,344
3,267
Total assets
567,380
571,898
Liabilities and Equity
Liabilities:
Mortgages payable
284,903
278,045
Line of credit
12,850
23,250
Dividends payable
5,872
5,806
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
7,512
7,790
Unamortized intangible lease liabilities
7,106
6,917
Total liabilities
318,243
321,808
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
One Liberty Properties, Inc. stockholders equity:
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 12,500 shares authorized; none issued
Common stock, $1 par value; 25,000 shares authorized; 15,422 and 15,221 shares issued and outstanding
15,422
15,221
Paid-in capital
212,533
210,324
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(1,196
)
(490
Accumulated undistributed net income
21,278
23,877
Total One Liberty Properties, Inc. stockholders equity
248,037
248,932
Non-controlling interests in joint ventures
1,100
1,158
Total equity
249,137
250,090
Total liabilities and equity
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Amounts in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Three Months Ended March 31,
2014
2013
Revenues:
Rental income, net
14,402
11,862
Operating expenses:
Depreciation and amortization
3,577
2,634
General and administrative (including $609 and $572, respectively, to related party)
2,211
1,960
Federal excise and state taxes
62
42
Real estate expenses (including $213 and $150, respectively, to related party)
1,098
772
Leasehold rent
77
Real estate acquisition costs
40
151
Total operating expenses
7,065
5,636
Operating income
7,337
6,226
Other income and expenses:
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
133
334
Other income
8
69
Interest:
Expense
(3,953
(3,103
Amortization of deferred financing costs
(238
(213
Income from continuing operations
3,287
3,313
Income from discontinued operations
13
136
Net income
3,300
3,449
Less net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests
(27
Net income attributable to One Liberty Properties, Inc.
3,273
3,450
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic
15,356
14,672
Diluted
15,456
14,772
Per common share attributable to common stockholders basic:
.20
.21
.01
.22
Per common share attributable to common stockholders diluted:
Cash distributions declared per share of common stock
.37
.35
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in Thousands)
Other comprehensive (loss) gain
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities
46
Net unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments
(718
178
One Liberty Propertys share of joint venture net unrealized (loss) gain on derivative instruments
(3
10
(716
234
Comprehensive income
2,584
3,683
Less: comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interests
Plus: unrealized loss on derivative instruments attributable to non-controlling interests
(10
Comprehensive income attributable to One Liberty Properties, Inc.
2,547
3,684
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the three month period ended March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
and the year ended December 31, 2013
Common Stock
Paid-in Capital
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated Undistributed Net Income
Non- Controlling Interests in Joint Ventures
Total
Balances, December 31, 2012
14,598
196,107
(1,578
28,001
931
238,059
Distributions - common stock Cash - $1.42 per share
(21,999
Shares issued through equity offering program net
363
8,802
9,165
Restricted stock vesting
50
(50
Shares issued through dividend reinvestment plan
210
4,025
4,235
Contributions from non-controlling interests
480
Distributions to non-controlling interests
(298
Compensation expense - restricted stock
1,440
17,875
49
17,924
Other comprehensive income
1,088
(4
1,084
Balances, December 31, 2013
Distributions - common stock Cash - $.37 per share
(5,872
33
611
644
101
(101
67
1,227
1,294
(75
472
27
(706
Balances, March 31, 2014
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Cash flows from operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities
(6
Increase in rental income from straight-lining of rent
(336
(221
Increase in rental income from amortization of intangibles relating to leases
(56
(22
Amortization of restricted stock expense
397
(133
(334
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
113
454
2,670
Amortization and write off of financing costs
240
213
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in escrow, deposits, other assets and receivables
1,099
(372
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities
(1,028
316
Net cash provided by operating activities
7,248
6,544
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of real estate
(5,109
(4,640
Improvements to real estate
(38
(332
Distributions of return of capital from unconsolidated joint ventures
Net proceeds from sale of real estate
Payment of leasing commissions
(16
Net proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities
19
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
34
(4,964
Cash flows from financing activities:
Scheduled amortization payments of mortgages payable
(1,874
(1,569
Repayment of mortgages payable
(19,003
Proceeds from mortgage financings
27,735
2,000
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net
Proceeds from bank line of credit
3,500
Repayment on bank line of credit
(13,900
Issuance of shares through dividend reinvestment plan
1,149
Payment of financing costs
(260
(71
Capital contributions from non-controlling interests
471
Distribution to non-controlling interests
Cash distributions to common stockholders
(5,806
(5,252
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
(7,745
228
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
(463
1,808
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
14,577
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
16,385
Continued on next page
(Unaudited) (Continued)
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest expense
4,027
3,063
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Purchase accounting allocation - intangible lease assets
408
582
Purchase accounting allocation - intangible lease liabilities
371
857
6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1 - Organization and Background
One Liberty Properties, Inc. (OLP) was incorporated in 1982 in Maryland. OLP is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (REIT). OLP acquires, owns and manages a geographically diversified portfolio of retail (including furniture stores, restaurants, office supply stores and supermarkets), industrial, flex, office, health and fitness and other properties, a substantial portion of which are subject to long-term net leases. As of March 31, 2014, OLP owned 109 properties, including five properties owned by consolidated joint ventures and five properties owned by unconsolidated joint ventures. The 109 properties are located in 29 states.
Note 2 - Basis of Preparation
Principles of Consolidation/Basis of Preparation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) for interim reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statement disclosures. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for fair presentation (including normal recurring accruals) have been included. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of OLP, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and its investment in five joint ventures in which the Company, as defined, has a controlling interest. OLP and its consolidated subsidiaries are hereinafter referred to as the Company. Material intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Investment in Joint Ventures
The Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity, or VIE, requires the performance of a qualitative rather than a quantitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Under this guidance, an entity would be required to consolidate a VIE if it has (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entitys economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could be significant to the VIE.
March 31, 2014 (Continued)
Note 2 - Basis of Preparation (Continued)
The Company assesses the accounting treatment for each joint venture investment. This assessment includes a review of each joint venture or limited liability company agreement to determine the rights of each party and whether those rights are protective or participating. The agreements typically contain certain protective rights such as the requirement of partner approval to sell, finance or refinance the property and the payment of capital expenditures and operating expenditures outside of the approved budget or operating plan. In situations where the Company and its partner, among other things, (i) approve the annual budget, (ii) approve certain expenditures, (iii) prepare or review and approve the joint ventures tax return before filing, and (iv) approve each lease at each property, the Company does not consolidate the joint venture as the Company considers these to be substantive participation rights that result in shared power over the activities that most significantly impact the performance of the joint venture.
With respect to the five consolidated joint ventures in which the Company has between an 85% to 95% interest, the Company has determined that (i) such ventures are not VIEs and (ii) the Company exercises substantial operating control and accordingly, such ventures are consolidated for financial statement purposes.
The Company accounts for its investments in five unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. All investments in these five joint ventures have sufficient equity at risk to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support and, as a group, the holders of the equity at risk have power through voting rights to direct the activities of these ventures. As a result, none of these five joint ventures are VIEs. In addition, although the Company is the managing member, it does not exercise substantial operating control over these entities, and therefore the entities are not consolidated. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as investments in unconsolidated joint ventures, and subsequently adjusted for their share of equity in earnings, cash contributions and distributions. None of the joint venture debt is recourse to the Company, subject to standard carve-outs.
Reclassification
Certain amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2013 relating to the operations of two properties that were sold in February 2014 have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated financial statements to conform to the current periods presentation.
Note 3 - Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per share was determined by dividing net income allocable to common stockholders for the applicable period by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during such period. Net income is also allocated to the unvested restricted stock during the applicable period, as the restricted stock is entitled to receive dividends and is therefore considered a participating security. Unvested restricted stock is not allocated net losses and/or any excess of dividends declared over net income; such amounts are allocated entirely to the common stockholders other than the holders of unvested restricted stock. The restricted stock units awarded under the Pay-for-Performance program described in Note 12 are excluded from the basic earnings per share calculation, as these units are not participating securities.
Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other rights exercisable for, or convertible into, common stock were exercised or converted or otherwise resulted in the issuance of common stock that shared in the earnings of the Company. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the diluted weighted average number of common shares includes 100,000 shares (of an aggregate of 200,000 shares) of common stock underlying the restricted stock units awarded pursuant to the Pay-For-Performance program. These 100,000 shares may vest upon satisfaction of the total stockholder return metric. The number of shares that would be issued pursuant to this metric is based on the market price and dividends paid as of the end of each quarterly period assuming the end of that quarterly period was the end of the vesting period. The remaining 100,000 shares of common stock underlying the restricted stock units awarded under the Pay-For-Performance program are not included during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, as they did not meet the return on capital performance metric during such periods.
There were no options outstanding to purchase shares of common stock or other rights exercisable for, or convertible into, common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
9
Note 3 - Earnings Per Common Share (Continued)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of earnings per share calculations (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per share:
Less earnings allocated to unvested shares
(178
(165
Income from continuing operations available for common stockholders
3,082
3,149
Discontinued operations
Net income available for common stockholders, basic and diluted
3,095
3,285
Denominator for basic earnings per share:
- weighted average common shares
- weighted average unvested restricted stock shares
Effect of diluted securities:
- restricted stock units awarded under Pay-for-Performance program
100
Denominator for diluted earnings per share
- weighted average shares
Earnings per common share, basic
Earnings per common share, diluted
Amounts attributable to One Liberty Properties, Inc. common stockholders, net of non-controlling interests:
3,260
3,314
Note 4 - Real Estate Acquisitions
The following chart details the Companys real estate acquisitions during the three months ended March 31, 2014 (amounts in thousands):
Description of Property
Date Acquired
Contract Purchase Price
Terms of Payment
Third Party Real Estate Acquisition Costs (a)
Total Wine and More retail store, Greensboro, North Carolina
January 21, 2014
2,971
All cash
Chuck E Cheese restaurant, Indianapolis, Indiana
January 23, 2014
2,138
Other (b)
24
Totals
5,109
(a) Included as an expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of income.
(b) Costs incurred for potential acquisitions and properties purchased in 2013.
The following chart provides the allocation of the purchase price for the Companys real estate acquisitions during the three months ended March 31, 2014 (amounts in thousands):
Building
Intangible Lease
Improvements
Asset
Liability
1,044
1,465
89
373
852
1,319
147
94
(274
Subtotals
1,896
2,784
236
467
Other (a)
74
70
18
(59
(97
1,970
2,854
254
(371
5,115
(a) Adjustments relating to properties purchased in 2013.
11
Note 4 - Real Estate Acquisitions (continued)
Each property purchased by the Company in 2014 is net leased by a single tenant pursuant to a lease that expires in 2017 or 2018.
As a result of these acquisitions, the Company recorded intangible lease assets of $467,000 and intangible lease liabilities of $274,000, representing the value of the origination costs and acquired leases. As of March 31, 2014, the weighted average amortization period for these acquisitions is 3.7 years for the intangible lease assets and 4.3 years for the intangible lease liabilities. The Company assessed the fair value of the lease intangibles based on estimated cash flow projections that utilize appropriate discount rates and available market information. Such inputs are Level 3 (as defined in Note 13) in the fair value hierarchy. The Company is currently in the process of finalizing the purchase price allocations for these properties; therefore, these allocations are preliminary and subject to change.
Note 5 - Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had investments in five unconsolidated joint ventures, each of which owned and operated one property. The Companys equity investment in such unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $4,916,000 and $4,906,000, respectively. The Company recorded equity in earnings of $133,000 and $334,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Note 6 - Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its tenants to make required rent payments. If the financial condition of a specific tenant were to deteriorate resulting in an impairment of its ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there was no balance in allowance for doubtful accounts.
The Company records bad debt expense as a reduction of rental income. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not incur any bad debt expense.
12
Note 7 - Discontinued Operations and Sale of Properties
On February 3, 2014, the Company sold two properties located in Michigan for a total sales price of $5,177,000, net of closing costs. At December 31, 2013, the Company recorded a $61,700 impairment charge representing the loss on the sale of these properties. The following table summarizes the components of income from discontinued operations applicable to these properties (amounts in thousands):
Rental income
141
36
Real estate expenses
17
Interest expense
111
Total expenses
128
104
Note 8 - Line of Credit
The Company has a $75,000,000 revolving credit facility with Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company, VNB New York Corp., Bank Leumi USA and Israel Discount Bank of New York. This facility matures March 31, 2015 and provides that the Company pay interest at the greater of (i) 90 day LIBOR plus 3% (3.23% at March 31, 2014) and (ii) 4.75% per annum, and there is an unused facility fee of .25% per annum. At March 31, 2014 and May 5, 2014, the outstanding balance under the facility was $12,850,000. The Company was in compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2014.
Note 9 - Compensation and Services Agreement
The Company agreed to pay fees of $3,300,000 and $3,465,000 in 2014 and 2015, respectively (including overhead expenses of $186,375 and $195,694 and property management fees, included in real estate expenses on the income statement, of $850,000 and $892,500 in 2014 and 2015, respectively) pursuant to the compensation and services agreement, as amended, with Majestic Property Management Corp. Majestic Property Management Corp is wholly-owned by the Vice Chairman of the Companys Board of Directors. The 2014 fee represents an increase of $400,000 over the 2013 fee and the 2015 fee represents a $165,000 increase over the 2014 fee. The results of a report prepared by an independent compensation consultant were used to evaluate and support these increases.
Note 10 - Common Stock Cash Dividend
On March 13, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $.37 per share on the Companys common stock, totaling $5,872,000. The quarterly dividend was paid on April 3, 2014 to stockholders of record on March 25, 2014.
Note 11 - Shares Issued through Equity Offering Program
On March 20, 2014, the Company entered into an amended and restated equity offering sales agreement to sell shares of the Companys common stock from time to time with an aggregate sales price of up to approximately $38,360,000, through an at the market equity offering program. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company sold 32,844 shares for proceeds of $720,000, net of commissions of $7,000, and incurred offering costs, primarily professional fees, of $76,000. Subsequent to March 31, 2014 and through April 4, 2014, the Company sold 26,262 shares for proceeds of $573,300, net of commissions of $6,000.
Note 12 - Stock Based Compensation
The Companys 2012 Incentive Plan, approved by the Companys stockholders in June 2012, permits the Company to grant, among other things, stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance share awards and any one or more of the foregoing to its employees, officers, directors and consultants. A maximum of 600,000 shares of the Companys common stock is authorized for issuance pursuant to this Plan, of which 229,000 have been issued as of March 31, 2014. An aggregate of 452,000 shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units are outstanding under the Companys 2003 and 2009 equity incentive plans (collectively, the Prior Plans) and have not yet vested. No additional awards may be granted under the Prior Plans.
The restricted stock grants are charged to general and administrative expense over the respective vesting periods based on the market value of the common stock on the grant date. Substantially all restricted stock awards made to date provide for vesting upon the fifth anniversary of the date of grant and under certain circumstances may vest earlier. For accounting purposes, the restricted stock is not included in the shares shown as outstanding on the balance sheet until they vest; however dividends are paid on the unvested shares.
On September 14, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a Pay-for-Performance program under the Companys 2009 Incentive Plan and awarded 200,000 performance share awards in the form of restricted stock units (the Units). The holders of Units are not entitled to dividends or to vote the underlying shares until the Units vest and shares are issued. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the shares underlying the Units are not included in the shares shown as outstanding on the balance sheet. If the defined performance criteria are satisfied in full at June 30, 2017, one share of the Companys common stock will vest and be
14
Note 12 - Stock Based Compensation (Continued)
issued for each Unit outstanding and a pro-rata portion of the Units will vest and be issued if the performance criteria fall between defined ranges. In the event that the performance criteria are not satisfied in whole or in part at June 30, 2017, the unvested Units will be forfeited and no shares of the Companys common stock will be issued for those Units. No Units were forfeited or vested in the three months ended March 31, 2014.
As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no options outstanding under the Companys equity incentive plans.
The following is a summary of the activity of the equity incentive plans (excluding, except as otherwise noted, the 200,000 Units):
Restricted share grants
118,850
112,650
Per share grant price
20.54
21.59
Deferred compensation to be recognized over vesting period
2,441,000
2,432,000
Non-vested shares:
Non-vested beginning of period
470,015
407,460
Grants
Vested during period
(101,300
(50,095
Forfeitures
(6,520
Non-vested end of period
481,045
Average per share value of non-vested shares (based on grant price)
14.55
14.22
Value of shares vested during the period (based on grant price)
621,000
876,000
The total charge to operations for all incentive plans, including the 200,000 Units, is as follows:
Outstanding restricted stock grants
443,000
367,000
Outstanding restricted stock units
29,000
30,000
Total charge to operations
472,000
397,000
As of March 31, 2014, there were approximately $6,188,000 of total compensation costs related to nonvested awards that have not yet been recognized, including $372,000 related to the Pay-for-Performance program (net of forfeiture and performance assumptions which are re-evaluated quarterly). These compensation costs will be charged to general and administrative expense over the remaining respective vesting periods. The weighted average vesting period is approximately 3.1 years.
15
Note 13 - Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures the fair value of financial instruments based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, a fair value hierarchy distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity and the reporting entitys own assumptions about market participant assumptions. In accordance with the fair value hierarchy, Level 1 assets/liabilities are valued based on quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets, Level 2 assets/liabilities are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments, on quoted prices in less active or inactive markets, or on other observable market inputs and Level 3 assets/liabilities are valued based significantly on unobservable market inputs.
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, escrow, deposits and other assets and receivables, and accrued expenses and other liabilities are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, but are considered to be recorded at amounts that approximate fair value.
At March 31, 2014, the $289,624,000 estimated fair value of the Companys mortgages payable is more than their carrying value by approximately $4,721,000 assuming a blended market interest rate of 4.8% based on the 9.4 year weighted average remaining term of the mortgages. At December 31, 2013, the $283,142,000 estimated fair value of the Companys mortgages payable is more than their carrying value by approximately $5,097,000 assuming a blended market interest rate of 5% based on the 9.0 year weighted average remaining term of the mortgages.
At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the $12,850,000 and $23,250,000, respectively, carrying amount of the Companys line of credit approximates its fair value.
The fair value of the Companys mortgages payable and line of credit are estimated using unobservable inputs such as available market information and discounted cash flow analysis based on borrowing rates the Company believes it could obtain with similar terms and maturities. These fair value measurements fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
16
Note 13 - Fair Value Measurements (Continued)
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value
The fair value of the Companys available-for-sale securities and derivative financial instruments was determined using the following inputs (amounts in thousands):
Carrying and
Fair Value Measurements Using Fair Value Hierarchy on a Recurring Basis
As of
Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Financial assets:
Available-for-sale securities:
Equity securities
287
282
Derivative financial instruments:
Interest rate swaps
214
265
Financial liabilities:
1,441
774
The Company does not own any financial instruments that are classified as Level 3.
Available-for-sale securities
At March 31, 2014, the Companys available-for-sale securities were as follows:
(i) a $264,000 investment in 37,081 shares of BRT Realty Trust and (ii) a $23,000 investment in other equity securities (included in other assets on the balance sheet). The aggregate cost of these securities was $138,000 and the unrealized gain thereon was $149,000. Such unrealized gains were included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the balance sheet. Fair values are approximated based on current market quotes from financial sources that track such securities.
Derivative financial instruments
Fair values are approximated using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of the derivatives. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities.
Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with it use Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads, to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparty. As of March 31, 2014, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company determined that its derivative valuation is classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
As of March 31, 2014, the Company had entered into 14 interest rate derivatives, all of which were interest rate swaps, related to 14 outstanding mortgage loans with an aggregate $76,732,000 notional amount and mature between 2014 and 2024 (weighted average maturity of 6.75 years). Such interest rate swaps, all of which were designated as cash flow hedges, converted Libor based variable rate mortgages to fixed annual rate mortgages with interest rates ranging from 3.55% to 6.50% (weighted average interest rate of 4.98%). The fair value of the Companys derivatives designated as hedging instruments in asset and liability positions reflected as other assets or other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets were $214,000 and $1,441,000, respectively, at March 31, 2014 and $265,000 and $774,000, respectively, at December 31, 2013.
Two of the Companys unconsolidated joint ventures, in which a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company is a 50% partner, had an interest rate derivative outstanding at March 31, 2014 with a notional amount of $3,776,000. This interest rate derivative, which was entered into in March 2011, has an interest rate of 5.81% and matures in April 2018.
The following table presents the effect of the Companys derivative financial instruments on the statement of income for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):
Consolidated
Amount of (loss) income recognized on derivatives in Other comprehensive (loss)
(1,106
26
Amount of (loss) reclassification from Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) into Interest expense
(388
(152
Joint Ventures (Companys share)
Amount of (loss) gain recognized on derivative in Other comprehensive (loss)
(7
Amount of (loss) reclassification from Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) into Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
(14
No gain or loss was recognized with respect to hedge ineffectiveness or to amounts excluded from effectiveness testing on the Companys cash flow hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. During the twelve months ending March 31, 2015, the Company estimates an additional $1,639,000 will be reclassified from other comprehensive income (loss) as an increase to interest expense.
The derivative agreements in effect at March 31, 2014 provide that if the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company which is a party to the agreement defaults or is capable of being declared in default on any of its indebtedness, then a default can be declared on such subsidiarys derivative obligation. In addition, the Company is a party to one of the derivative agreements and if the subsidiary defaults on the loan subject to such agreement and if there are swap breakage losses on account of the derivative being terminated early, the Company could be held liable for interest rate swap breakage losses, if any.
As of March 31, 2014, the fair value of the derivatives in a liability position, including accrued interest, and excluding any adjustments for nonperformance risk, was approximately $1,571,000. In the unlikely event that the Company breaches any of the contractual provisions of the derivative contracts, it would be required to settle its obligations thereunder at their termination liability value of $1,571,000. Such amount is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities at March 31, 2014.
Note 14 - New Accounting Pronouncement
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued updated guidance that changes the criteria for determining which future disposals can be presented as discontinued operations and modifies related disclosure requirements. Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entitys operations and financial results. The guidance is effective prospectively as of the first quarter of 2015, with early adoption permitted for new disposals or new classifications as held-for-sale. The Company early adopted this new guidance in the first quarter of 2014 and it did not have any effect on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. It is expected that most of the Companys future dispositions will not meet the new criteria for being treated as a discontinued operation.
Note 15 - Subsequent Events
Subsequent events have been evaluated and there are no events relative to the Companys consolidated financial statements that require additional disclosure.
20
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provision for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and include this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words may, will, could, believe, expect, intend, anticipate, estimate, project, or similar expressions or variations thereof. Forward-looking statements should not be relied on since they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect actual results, performance or achievements. Investors are encouraged to review the risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 under the caption Item 1A. Risk Factors for a discussion of certain factors which may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.
Overview
We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, organized in Maryland in 1982. We acquire, own and manage a geographically diversified portfolio of retail (including furniture stores, restaurants, office supply stores and supermarkets), industrial, flex, office, health and fitness and other properties, a substantial portion of which are leased under long-term net leases. As of March 31, 2014, we own 109 properties (including five properties owned by our unconsolidated joint ventures) located in 29 states. Based on square footage, our occupancy rate at March 31, 2014 is approximately 98.0%, and assuming a new tenant takes possession of a property as contemplated, will be approximately 99.0% at May 15, 2014.
We face a variety of risks and challenges in our business. We, among other things, face the possibility we will not be able to acquire accretive properties on acceptable terms, lease our properties on terms favorable to us or at all, our tenants may not be able to pay their rental and other obligations and we may not be able to renew or relet, on acceptable terms, leases that are expiring.
We seek to manage the risk of our real property portfolio by diversifying among types of properties and industries, locations, tenants and scheduled lease expirations. We monitor the risk of tenant non-payments through a variety of approaches tailored to the applicable situation. Generally, based on our assessment of the credit risk posed by our tenants, we monitor a tenants financial condition through one or more of the following actions: reviewing tenant financial statements, obtaining other tenant related financial information, regular contact with tenants representatives, tenant credit checks and regular management reviews of our tenants.
Further, we are sensitive to the risks facing the retail industry as a result of the growth of e-commerce. We are addressing this exposure by acquiring properties that are less sensitive to e-commerce risk such as restaurant properties or properties that capitalize on e-commerce activities such as e-commerce distribution and warehousing facilities.
In acquiring properties, we balance an evaluation of the terms of the leases and the credit of the existing tenants with a fundamental analysis of the real estate to be acquired, which analysis takes into account, among other things, the estimated value of the property, local demographics and the ability to re-rent or dispose of the property on favorable terms upon lease expiration or early termination.
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that we distribute currently at least 90% of ordinary taxable income to our stockholders. We intend to comply with these requirements and to maintain our REIT status.
Our 2014 contractual rental income is approximately $53.8 million and represents, after giving effect to any abatements, concessions or adjustments, the base rent payable to us in calendar year 2014 under leases in effect at March 31, 2014. The 2014 contractual rental income excludes approximately $1.2 million of straight-line rent, amortization of approximately $180,000 of intangibles and our share of the rental income payable to our unconsolidated joint ventures, which in 2014 will be approximately $1.5 million.
The following table sets forth scheduled lease expirations of leases for our properties (excluding unconsolidated joint ventures) as of March 31, 2014 for the calendar years indicated below:
Year of Lease Expiration (1)
Number of Expiring Leases
Approximate Square Footage Subject to Expiring Leases
2014 Contractual Rental Income Under Expiring Leases
Percent of 2014 Contractual Rental Income Represented by Expiring Leases
118,019
913,903
1.7
%
2015
358,086
3,855,743
7.2
2016
458,262
3,801,822
7.1
2017
104,508
2,063,140
3.8
2018
409,967
6,079,257
11.3
2019
146,303
1,712,920
3.2
2020
181,108
4,305,178
8.0
2021
119,260
1,121,779
2.1
2022
1,154,724
8,730,507
16.2
2023 and thereafter
29
2,114,914
21,206,503
39.4
114
5,165,151
53,790,752
100.0
(1) Lease expirations assume tenants do not exercise existing renewal options.
22
Results of Operations
The following table compares revenues and operating expenses of continuing operations for the periods indicated:
Increase
(Dollars in thousands)
(Decrease)
Change
2,540
21.4
943
35.8
General and administrative
251
12.8
47.6
326
42.2
(111
(73.5
1,429
25.4
1,111
17.8
Revenues
Rental income. The increase is primarily due to rental income of approximately $2.3 million earned from 13 properties acquired in 2013 and 2014 ($2.2 million from the eleven properties acquired in 2013), and to a lesser extent, a $219,000 increase in real estate tax and expense reimbursements from tenants and $94,000 from the lease of recently expanded rentable space at an existing property. This increase was partially offset by a $154,000 decrease in rental income resulting from lease expirations in January 2014.
Operating Expenses
Depreciation and amortization. Approximately $895,000 of the increase is due to depreciation expense on the properties we acquired in 2013 and 2014 ($863,000 from the eleven properties acquired in 2013) and the balance is due primarily to depreciation on improvements to properties.
General and administrative expenses. The increase is attributable to several factors including (i) an increase of $75,000 in non-cash compensation expense primarily related to the increase in the number of restricted stock awards granted in 2014 and the higher fair value of such awards at the time of grant; (ii) a quarterly increase of $37,500 in the amount payable pursuant to the compensation and services agreement; (iii) an increase of $35,000 in accounting fees, and (iv) increases of $103,500 in various general and administrative expenses, none of which are individually significant and a majority of which are expected to be non-recurring.
Real estate expenses. The increase is due to approximately (i) $169,000 of increases in snow removal expense at several of our properties due to the harsh 2014 winter, a significant portion of which is rebilled to tenants and (ii) $78,000 of expenses related to a property vacated by the tenant at lease expiration in January 2014. The property has been net leased to a new
23
tenant that we anticipate will become responsible for rent and expenses on or about May 15, 2014. In addition, there was a quarterly increase of $62,500 in the amount for property management services pursuant to the compensation and services agreement due to the increase in the number and nature of properties in our portfolio.
Real estate acquisition costs. These costs, which include acquisition fees, legal and other transactional costs and expenses, decreased from the three months ended March 31, 2013 due to the inclusion in the three months ended March 31, 2013, of fees paid to our joint venture partner in connection with an acquisition.
Other Income and Expenses
The following table compares other income and expenses for the periods indicated:
(201
(60.2
)%
(61
(88.4
850
27.4
25
11.7
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures. The decrease is attributable substantially to the sale in May 2013 of a property owned by us and another entity as tenants-in-common and the sale in April 2013 of our interest in the Plano, Texas joint venture.
Interest expense. The following table details interest expense for the periods indicated:
Interest expense:
Credit line interest
257
52
205
394.2
Mortgage interest
3,696
3,051
645
21.1
3,953
3,103
The increase is due to the $20.6 million increase in the weighted average balance outstanding under our line of credit in the three months ended March 31, 2014. The weighted average balance increased due to borrowings to purchase several properties in 2013 and 2014, partially offset by repayments on the facility (i) with proceeds from the financing of several properties in 2013 and 2014 and (ii) from the use of a portion of the proceeds from the sale of two properties in 2014.
The following table reflects the interest rate on our mortgage debt and principal amount of outstanding mortgage debt, in each case on a weighted average basis:
Interest rate on mortgage debt
5.29
5.41
(.12
(2.2
Principal amount of mortgage debt
279,481
225,693
53,788
23.8
The increase in mortgage interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 is due to the increase in the weighted average amount of mortgage debt outstanding, partially offset by a decrease in the weighted average interest rate on outstanding mortgage debt. The increase in the weighted average balance outstanding is due to the incurrence of mortgage debt of $64.8 million in connection with properties acquired in 2013 and 2014 and the financing or refinancing of $7.4 million, net of refinanced amounts, in connection with properties acquired in prior years. The decrease in the weighted average interest rate is due to the financing (including financings effectuated in connection with acquisitions) or refinancing in 2013 and 2014 of $97.4 million of gross new mortgage debt with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 4.8%.
The following table compares discontinued operations for the periods indicated:
(123
(90.4
Discontinued operations. Discontinued operations include the income from operations of two properties sold in February 2014.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our sources of liquidity and capital include cash flow from operations, cash and cash equivalents, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, refinancing existing mortgage loans, obtaining mortgage loans secured by our unencumbered properties, issuance of our equity securities and property sales. Our available liquidity at May 5, 2014 was approximately $68.3 million, including approximately $6.1 million of cash and cash equivalents (net of the credit facilitys required $7.5 million deposit maintenance balance) and $62.2 million available under our revolving credit facility.
Liquidity and Financing
We expect to meet substantially all of our operating cash requirements (including dividend and mortgage amortization payments) from cash flow from operations. To the extent that cash flow from operations is not adequate to cover all of our operating needs, we will be required to use our available cash and cash equivalents, or draw on our credit line (to the extent permitted) to satisfy operating requirements.
At March 31, 2014, excluding mortgage indebtedness of our unconsolidated joint ventures, we had 51 outstanding mortgages payable secured by 73 properties, in aggregate principal amount of approximately $284.9 million. These mortgages represent first liens on individual real estate investments with an aggregate carrying value of approximately $463.5 million, before accumulated depreciation of $58.4 million. After giving effect to interest rate swap agreements, the mortgage payments bear interest at fixed rates ranging from 3.13% to 7.81% (a 5.13% weighted average interest rate) and mature between 2014 and 2037.
The following table sets forth, as of March 31, 2014, information with respect to our mortgage debt (excluding mortgage debt of our unconsolidated joint ventures), that is payable from April 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016:
Amortization payments
5,428
7,366
7,186
19,980
Principal due at maturity
12,479
4,955
25,678
43,112
17,907
12,321
32,864
63,092
At March 31, 2014, the Companys unconsolidated joint ventures had first mortgages on four properties with outstanding balances of approximately $17.6 million, bearing interest at rates ranging from 5.81% to 6.0% (a 5.86% weighted average interest rate) and mature between 2015 and 2018.
We intend to make debt amortization payments from operating cash flow and, though no assurance can be given that we will be successful in this regard, generally intend to refinance or extend the mortgage loans which mature in 2014 through 2016. We intend to repay the amounts not refinanced or extended from our existing funds and sources of funds, including our available cash and our credit line (to the extent available).
We continuously seek to refinance existing mortgage loans on terms we deem acceptable, in order to generate additional liquidity. Additionally, in the normal course of our business, we sell properties when we determine that it is in our best interests, which also
generates additional liquidity. Further, since each of our encumbered properties is subject to a non-recourse mortgage (with standard carve outs), if our in-house evaluation of the market value of such property is substantially less than the principal balance outstanding on the mortgage loan, we may determine to convey such property to the mortgagee in order to terminate our mortgage obligations, including payment of interest, principal and real estate taxes, with respect to such property.
Typically, we utilize funds from our credit facility to acquire a property and, thereafter secure long-term, fixed rate mortgage debt on such property. We apply the proceeds from the mortgage loan to repay borrowings under the credit facility, thus providing us with the ability to re-borrow under the credit facility for the acquisition of additional properties. As a result, in order to grow our business, it is important to have a credit facility in place. Additionally in connection with the acquisition of a number of larger properties during 2013, we arranged for contemporaneous mortgage financing covering a major portion of the applicable purchase price.
Credit Facility
We can borrow up to $75 million pursuant to our revolving credit facility which is available to us for the acquisition of commercial real estate, repayment of mortgage debt, property improvements and general working capital purposes; provided, that if used for property improvements and working capital purposes, the amount outstanding for such purposes will not exceed the lesser of $15 million and 15% of the borrowing base, as defined in the credit agreement, and if used for working capital purposes, will not exceed $10 million. The facility matures on March 31, 2015 and bears interest at the greater of (i) 90 day LIBOR plus 3% and (ii) 4.75%. There is an unused facility fee of 0.25% per annum on the difference between the outstanding loan balance and $75 million. The credit facility requires maintenance of $7.5 million in average deposit balances.
The terms of our revolving credit facility include certain restrictions and covenants which may limit, among other things, the incurrence of liens, and which require compliance with financial ratios relating to, among other things, the minimum amount of tangible net worth, the minimum amount of debt service coverage, the minimum amount of fixed charge coverage, the maximum amount of debt to value, the minimum level of net income, certain investment limitations and the minimum value of unencumbered properties and the number of such properties. Net proceeds received from the sale, financing or refinancing of properties are generally required to be used to repay amounts outstanding under our credit facility. At March 31, 2014, we were in compliance in all material respects with the covenants under this facility.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations
We compute funds from operations, or FFO, in accordance with the White Paper on Funds From Operations issued by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) and NAREITs related guidance. FFO is defined in the White Paper as net income (computed in accordance with generally accepting accounting principles), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization, plus impairment write-downs of depreciable real estate and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures will be calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. Since the NAREIT White Paper only provides guidelines for computing FFO, the computation of FFO may vary from one REIT to another. We compute adjusted funds from operations, or AFFO, by deducting from FFO our straight-line rent accruals and amortization of lease intangibles and adding back the amortization of restricted stock compensation and the amortization of costs in connection with our financing activities (including our share of our unconsolidated joint ventures).
We believe that FFO and AFFO are useful and standard supplemental measures of the operating performance for equity REITs and are used frequently by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in evaluating equity REITs, many of which present FFO and AFFO when reporting their operating results. FFO and AFFO are intended to exclude GAAP historical cost depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, which assures that the value of real estate assets diminish predictability over time. In fact, real estate values have historically risen and fallen with market conditions. As a result, we believe that FFO and AFFO provide a performance measure that when compared year over year, should reflect the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, interest costs and other matters without the inclusion of depreciation and amortization, providing a perspective that may not be necessarily apparent from net income. We also consider FFO and AFFO to be useful to us in evaluating potential property acquisitions.
FFO and AFFO do not represent net income or cash flows from operations as defined by GAAP. FFO and AFFO should not be considered to be an alternative to net income as a reliable measure of our operating performance; nor should FFO and AFFO be considered an alternative to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities (as defined by GAAP) as measures of liquidity.
FFO and AFFO do not measure whether cash flow is sufficient to fund all of our cash needs, including principal amortization, capital improvements and distributions to stockholders. FFO and AFFO do not represent cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as defined by GAAP.
Management recognizes that there are limitations in the use of FFO and AFFO. In evaluating our performance, management is careful to examine GAAP measures such as net income and cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities. Management also prepares and reviews the reconciliation of net income to FFO and AFFO.
28
The table below provides a reconciliation of net income in accordance with GAAP to FFO and AFFO for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
Add: depreciation of properties
3,515
2,638
Add: our share of depreciation in unconsolidated joint ventures
93
216
Add: amortization of deferred leasing costs
35
32
Add: our share of amortization of deferred leasing costs in unconsolidated joint ventures
Add: federal excise tax relating to gain on sales
(19
Funds from operations
6,897
6,344
Deduct: straight-line rent accruals and amortization of lease intangibles
(387
(243
Add: our share of straight-line rent reversals and amortization of lease intangibles of unconsolidated joint ventures
59
Add: amortization of restricted stock compensation
Add: amortization of deferred financing costs
238
212
Add: our share of amortization of deferred financing costs in unconsolidated joint ventures
Adjusted funds from operations
7,224
6,778
The table below provides a reconciliation of net income per common share (on a diluted basis) in accordance with GAAP to FFO and AFFO:
.18
.02
.43
.42
(.02
.03
.45
.44
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our primary market risk exposure is the effect of changes in interest rates on the interest cost of draws on our revolving variable rate credit facility and the effect of changes in the fair value of our interest rate swap agreements. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond our control.
We use interest rate swaps to limit interest rate risk. These swaps are used for hedging purposes - not for speculation. We do not enter into interest rate swaps for trading purposes.
At March 31, 2014, we had 15 interest rate swap agreements outstanding (including one held by two of our unconsolidated joint ventures). The fair market value of the interest rate swaps is dependent upon existing market interest rates and swap spreads, which change over time. As of March 31, 2014, if there had been an increase of 100 basis points in forward interest rates, the fair market value of the interest rate swaps and net unrealized gain on derivative instruments would have increased by approximately $4.19 million. If there were a decrease of 100 basis points in forward interest rates, the fair market value of the interest rate swaps and net unrealized gain on derivative instruments would have decreased by approximately $4.19 million. These changes would not have any impact on our net income or cash.
Our mortgage debt, after giving effect to interest rate swap agreements, bears interest at fixed rates and accordingly, the effect of changes in interest rates would not impact the amount of interest expense that we incur under these mortgages.
Our credit facility is a revolving variable rate facility which is sensitive to interest rates. Under current market conditions, we do not believe that our risk of material potential losses in future earnings, fair values and/or cash flows from near-term changes in market rates that we consider reasonably possible is material. We assessed the market risk for our revolving credit facility and believe that there is no foreseeable market risk because interest is charged at the greater of (i) 90 day LIBOR plus 3% and (ii) 4.75% per annum. At March 31, 2014, 90 day LIBOR plus 3% was approximately 3.23%; therefore, an increase or decrease of 100 basis points on this interest rate would not have any impact on the interest expense related to this facility.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) are effective.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended March 31, 2014 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No.
Title of Exhibit
31.1
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2
Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant)
Date: May 8, 2014
/s/ Patrick J. Callan, Jr.
Patrick J. Callan, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
/s/ David W. Kalish
David W. Kalish
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)