Companies:
10,652
total market cap:
$140.563 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
OneMain Financial
OMF
#2666
Rank
$6.70 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$56.91
Share price
-0.35%
Change (1 day)
7.24%
Change (1 year)
๐ณ Financial services
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
OneMain Financial
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2014 Q3
OneMain Financial - 10-Q quarterly report FY2014 Q3
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2014
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-36129
SPRINGLEAF HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
27-3379612
(State of Incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
601 N.W. Second Street, Evansville, IN
47708
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(812) 424-8031
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
Non-accelerated filer
x
Smaller reporting company
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
x
At
November 14, 2014
, there were 114,832,895 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
8
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
59
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
91
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
91
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
92
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
92
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
92
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
92
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
92
Item 5.
Other Information
92
Item 6.
Exhibits
92
2
Table of Contents
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
SPRINGLEAF HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
1,970,512
$
431,409
Investment securities
1,723,381
582,090
Net finance receivables:
Personal loans (includes loans of consolidated VIEs of $1.8 billion in 2014 and $1.6 billion in 2013)
3,607,209
3,171,704
SpringCastle Portfolio (includes loans of consolidated VIEs of $2.1 billion in 2014 and $2.5 billion in 2013)
2,083,145
2,505,349
Real estate loans (includes loans of consolidated VIEs of $0 in 2014 and $5.7 billion in 2013)
655,299
7,982,349
Retail sales finance
56,900
98,911
Net finance receivables
6,402,553
13,758,313
Allowance for finance receivable losses (includes allowance of consolidated VIEs of $67.8 million in 2014 and $153.7 million in 2013)
(163,636
)
(333,325
)
Net finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses
6,238,917
13,424,988
Finance receivables held for sale
493,196
—
Restricted cash (includes restricted cash of consolidated VIEs of $295.7 million in 2014 and $522.8 million in 2013)
312,825
536,005
Other assets
523,987
428,194
Total assets
$
11,262,818
$
15,402,686
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Long-term debt (includes debt of consolidated VIEs of $3.1 billion in 2014 and $7.3 billion in 2013)
$
7,858,037
$
12,769,036
Insurance claims and policyholder liabilities
430,052
394,168
Deferred and accrued taxes
153,873
145,520
Other liabilities
310,738
207,334
Total liabilities
8,752,700
13,516,058
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Note 13)
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 2,000,000,000 shares authorized, 114,832,895 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013
1,148
1,148
Additional paid-in capital
528,177
524,087
Accumulated other comprehensive income
34,289
28,095
Retained earnings
1,538,153
986,690
Springleaf Holdings, Inc. shareholders’ equity
2,101,767
1,540,020
Non-controlling interests
408,351
346,608
Total shareholders’ equity
2,510,118
1,886,628
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
11,262,818
$
15,402,686
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Table of Contents
SPRINGLEAF HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands except earnings (loss) per share)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Revised
Revised
Interest income:
Finance charges
$
435,445
$
583,926
$
1,513,590
$
1,577,561
Finance receivables held for sale originated as held for investment
47,679
—
54,921
—
Total interest income
483,124
583,926
1,568,511
1,577,561
Interest expense
180,142
229,157
576,863
700,868
Net interest income
302,982
354,769
991,648
876,693
Provision for finance receivable losses
102,971
162,264
379,196
339,061
Net interest income after provision for finance receivable losses
200,011
192,505
612,452
537,632
Other revenues:
Insurance
44,010
38,277
125,116
107,144
Investment
11,251
6,532
31,334
27,254
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt
—
(33,572
)
(6,615
)
(33,809
)
Net gain (loss) on fair value adjustments on debt
1,352
6,586
(15,033
)
7,097
Net gain on sales of real estate loans and related trust assets
641,328
—
731,314
—
Other
(11,975
)
1,603
(7,403
)
6,986
Total other revenues
685,966
19,426
858,713
114,672
Other expenses:
Operating expenses:
Salaries and benefits
94,702
214,552
278,504
371,842
Other operating expenses
75,117
72,478
192,889
194,457
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
20,141
16,550
57,173
47,650
Total other expenses
189,960
303,580
528,566
613,949
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
696,017
(91,649
)
942,599
38,355
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
234,322
(30,698
)
309,594
(1,998
)
Net income (loss)
461,695
(60,951
)
633,005
40,353
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
34,945
31,643
81,542
86,383
Net income (loss) attributable to Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
$
426,750
$
(92,594
)
$
551,463
$
(46,030
)
Share Data:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic
114,788,439
100,000,000
114,788,439
100,000,000
Diluted
115,316,314
100,000,000
115,212,398
100,000,000
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic
$
3.72
$
(0.93
)
$
4.80
$
(0.46
)
Diluted
$
3.70
$
(0.93
)
$
4.79
$
(0.46
)
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
Table of Contents
SPRINGLEAF HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Revised
Revised
Net income (loss)
$
461,695
$
(60,951
)
$
633,005
$
40,353
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net unrealized gains (losses) on:
Investment securities on which other-than-temporary impairments were taken
(8
)
(17
)
(357
)
(135
)
All other investment securities
(3,844
)
(429
)
15,498
(10,989
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
761
(2,056
)
267
38
Income tax effect:
Net unrealized (gains) losses on:
Investment securities on which other-than-temporary impairments were taken
3
6
125
47
All other investment securities
1,346
149
(5,426
)
3,844
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, before reclassification adjustments
(1,742
)
(2,347
)
10,107
(7,195
)
Reclassification adjustments included in net income (loss):
Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities
(2,750
)
355
(6,019
)
(2,253
)
Cash flow hedges
—
—
—
(160
)
Income tax effect:
Net realized gains (losses) on investment securities
962
(124
)
2,106
789
Cash flow hedges
—
—
—
56
Reclassification adjustments included in net income (loss), net of tax
(1,788
)
231
(3,913
)
(1,568
)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
(3,530
)
(2,116
)
6,194
(8,763
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
458,165
(63,067
)
639,199
31,590
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests
34,945
31,643
81,542
86,383
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
$
423,220
$
(94,710
)
$
557,657
$
(54,793
)
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
Table of Contents
SPRINGLEAF HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
Springleaf Holdings, Inc. Shareholders’ Equity
(dollars in thousands)
Common
Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Retained
Earnings
Springleaf
Holdings, Inc.
Shareholders’
Equity
Non-controlling
Interests
Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Balance, January 1, 2014
$
1,148
$
524,087
$
28,095
$
986,690
$
1,540,020
$
346,608
$
1,886,628
Share-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures
—
4,090
—
—
4,090
—
4,090
Change in non-controlling interests:
Distributions declared to joint venture partners
—
—
—
—
—
(19,799
)
(19,799
)
Change in net unrealized gains:
Investment securities
—
—
5,927
—
5,927
—
5,927
Foreign currency translation adjustments
—
—
267
—
267
—
267
Net income
—
—
—
551,463
551,463
81,542
633,005
Balance, September 30, 2014
$
1,148
$
528,177
$
34,289
$
1,538,153
$
2,101,767
$
408,351
$
2,510,118
Balance, January 1, 2013 - Revised
$
1,000
$
147,459
$
26,472
$
1,005,991
$
1,180,922
$
—
$
1,180,922
Share-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures
—
131,250
—
—
131,250
—
131,250
Change in non-controlling interests:
Contributions from joint venture partners
—
—
—
—
—
438,081
438,081
Distributions declared to joint venture partners
—
—
—
—
—
(204,516
)
(204,516
)
Change in net unrealized losses:
Investment securities
—
—
(8,697
)
—
(8,697
)
—
(8,697
)
Cash flow hedges
—
—
(104
)
—
(104
)
—
(104
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
—
—
38
—
38
—
38
Net income (loss)
—
—
—
(46,030
)
(46,030
)
86,383
40,353
Balance, September 30, 2013 - Revised
$
1,000
$
278,709
$
17,709
$
959,961
$
1,257,379
$
319,948
$
1,577,327
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
Table of Contents
SPRINGLEAF HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Revised
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income
$
633,005
$
40,353
Reconciling adjustments:
Provision for finance receivable losses
379,196
339,061
Depreciation and amortization
(43,342
)
(39,138
)
Deferred income tax charge (benefit)
14,970
(88,476
)
Net loss (gain) on fair value adjustments on debt
15,033
(7,097
)
Net gain on sales of real estate loans and related trust assets
(731,314
)
—
Net charge-offs on finance receivables held for sale
10,713
—
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt
6,615
33,809
Share-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures
4,090
131,250
Other
852
(707
)
Cash flows due to changes in:
Other assets and other liabilities
63,004
91,943
Insurance claims and policyholder liabilities
35,884
14,917
Taxes receivable and payable
(27,456
)
(24,732
)
Accrued interest and finance charges
(7,900
)
(30,566
)
Restricted cash not reinvested
(18,765
)
33,885
Other, net
892
(828
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
335,477
493,674
Cash flows from investing activities
Finance receivables originated or purchased, net of deferred origination costs
(1,914,270
)
(1,688,630
)
Principal collections on finance receivables
2,294,057
2,386,086
Purchase of SpringCastle Portfolio
—
(2,963,547
)
Sales and principal collections on finance receivables held for sale originated as held for investment
3,437,430
—
Available-for-sale investment securities purchased
(273,972
)
(442,686
)
Trading investment securities purchased
(1,085,187
)
(6,295
)
Available-for-sale investment securities called, sold, and matured
226,658
721,042
Trading investment securities called, sold, and matured
32,415
7,492
Change in restricted cash
24,502
(395,552
)
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned
51,386
88,346
Other, net
(4,571
)
(4,749
)
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities
2,788,448
(2,298,493
)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of commissions
672,440
5,990,565
Repayment of long-term debt
(2,237,362
)
(4,723,188
)
Contributions from joint venture partners
—
438,081
Distributions to joint venture partners
(19,799
)
(204,516
)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities
(1,584,721
)
1,500,942
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (Continued)
(dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Revised
Effect of exchange rate changes
(101
)
(835
)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
1,539,103
(304,712
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
431,409
1,554,348
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
1,970,512
$
1,249,636
Supplemental non-cash activities
Transfer of finance receivables to real estate owned
$
46,982
$
70,004
Transfer of finance receivables held for investment to finance receivables held for sale (prior to deducting allowance for finance receivable losses)
$
6,901,755
$
—
Unsettled investment security purchases and sales
$
28,684
$
—
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
7
Table of Contents
SPRINGLEAF HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2014
1. Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Springleaf Holdings, Inc. (“SHI” or, collectively with its subsidiaries, whether directly or indirectly owned, “Springleaf,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a Delaware corporation, primarily owned by Springleaf Financial Holdings, LLC (the “Initial Stockholder”).
On October 21, 2013, SHI completed the initial public offering of its common stock. At
September 30, 2014
, the Initial Stockholder owned approximately
75%
of SHI’s common stock. The Initial Stockholder is owned primarily by a private equity fund managed by an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC (“Fortress”) and AIG Capital Corporation, a subsidiary of American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”).
SHI is a financial services holding company whose principal subsidiary is Springleaf Finance, Inc. (“SFI”). SFI’s principal subsidiary is Springleaf Finance Corporation (“SFC”), a financial services holding company with subsidiaries engaged in the consumer finance and credit insurance businesses.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
We prepared our condensed consolidated financial statements using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). These statements are unaudited. The year-end condensed balance sheet data was derived from our audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The statements include the accounts of SHI, its subsidiaries (all of which are wholly owned, except for certain indirect subsidiaries associated with a joint venture in which we own a
47%
equity interest), and variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which we hold a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date.
We eliminated all material intercompany accounts and transactions. We made judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect amounts reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. In management’s opinion, the condensed consolidated financial statements include the normal, recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of results. Ultimate results could differ from our estimates. We evaluated the effects of and the need to disclose events that occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2013
(“
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K”). We follow the same significant accounting policies for our interim reporting.
In connection with SHI’s initial public offering of its common stock previously discussed, SFI became a wholly owned subsidiary of SHI. As a result, the financial statements of SFI have been adjusted on a retrospective basis, as appropriate, as financial statements of SHI.
Prior Period Revisions
As disclosed in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K, we identified certain out-of-period errors in preparing our annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2013
. In addition to these errors, we had previously recorded and disclosed out-of-period adjustments in prior reporting periods when the errors were discovered. As a result, we revised all previously reported periods included in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Similarly, we have revised all previously reported periods included in this report. We corrected the errors identified in the fourth quarter of
2013
and included these corrections in the appropriate prior periods. In addition, we reversed all out-of period adjustments previously recorded and disclosed, and included the adjustments in the appropriate periods. After evaluating the quantitative and qualitative aspects of these corrections, we have determined that our previous applicable quarterly condensed financial statements and our annual consolidated financial statements were not materially misstated.
See Note 17 for further information on the prior period revisions.
In addition, during the first quarter of
2014
, we identified that the disclosure of the allowance for finance receivable losses related to our securitized finance receivables at
December 31, 2013
, was previously incorrectly overstated by
$26.8 million
. The parenthetical disclosure of the allowance of consolidated VIEs as of
December 31, 2013
on our condensed consolidated balance sheet and the related VIE disclosures in Notes 3 and 8 have been revised in this report to
$153.7 million
.
8
Table of Contents
During the first quarter of
2014
, we also discovered that our long-term debt associated with securitizations that were issued at a discount and which had embedded derivatives, was incorrectly excluded from the fair value disclosure of our financial instruments measured on a recurring basis. The affected fair value amount has been corrected in Note 18 in this report to include the fair value of our long-term debt measured on a recurring basis of
$363.7 million
at
December 31, 2013
.
During the second quarter of
2014
, we discovered that we incorrectly disclosed the carrying values at the date of sale of the real estate loans associated with the 2009-1 securitization and certain additional real estate loans sold on March 31, 2014. The affected carrying values have been corrected in Notes 1, 3, and 4 in this report as follows: (i) the carrying value of real estate loans associated with the 2009-1 securitization that were sold on March 31, 2014, was previously reported as
$742.0 million
but has been corrected to be
$724.9 million
and (ii) the carrying value of additional real estate loans sold on March 31, 2014, was previously reported as
$93.3 million
but has been corrected to be
$89.9 million
.
After evaluating the quantitative and qualitative aspects of these corrections (individually and in the aggregate), management has determined that our previously issued interim and annual consolidated financial statements were not materially misstated.
Fortress Acquisition
Due to the significance of the ownership interest acquired by FCFI Acquisition LLC, an affiliate of Fortress, (the “Fortress Acquisition”), the nature of the transaction, and at the direction of our acquirer, we applied push-down accounting to SFI as an acquired business. We revalued our assets and liabilities based on their fair values at the date of the Fortress Acquisition, November 30, 2010, in accordance with business combination accounting standards (“push-down accounting”).
SIGNIFICANT REAL ESTATE LOAN TRANSACTIONS
In the
third
quarter of
2014
, we entered into a series of transactions relating to the sales of our beneficial interests in our non-core real estate loans, the related servicing of these loans, and the sales of certain performing and non-performing real estate loans. The 2006-1 Securitization Assets Sale, the Securitization Assets Sale, the MSR Sale, and the September Whole Loan Sales are each defined below and are collectively referred to as the “Asset Sale.” The Asset Sale, along with the real estate transactions that were completed in the first half of 2014 (the “Prior Dispositions”) substantially complete the Company’s previously disclosed plan to liquidate its non-core real estate loans.
In conjunction with these real estate loan transactions, we have closed our servicing centers in Dallas, Texas, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and Wesley Chapel, Florida, and have eliminated certain staff positions in our Evansville, Indiana, location. In total, approximately
300
staff positions were eliminated. However, the total reduction in workforce was approximately
170
employees, as
130
employees have been transferred into other positions at Springleaf. We recorded restructuring costs of
$4.3 million
in the third quarter of 2014 due to the workforce reductions and the closings of the servicing facilities.
Our insurance subsidiaries have written certain insurance policies on properties collateralizing the loans that have been deconsolidated or disposed of as a result of these sales. As part of the disposition, the insurance policies associated with the sold loans have been or will be cancelled.
The “2006-1 Securitization Assets Sale”
On July 31, 2014, Second Street Funding LLC (“Second Street”), an indirect subsidiary of SHI, entered into an agreement to sell certain mortgage-backed notes and trust certificates issued by American General Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-1 to an unaffiliated third party, for a purchase price of
$9.5 million
subject to customary closing conditions. On August 1, 2014, the real estate loans included in the transaction were transferred from held for investment to held for sale, due to management’s intent to no longer hold these finance receivables for the foreseeable future. Second Street completed this transaction on September 30, 2014, at which time, the real estate loans included in the transaction had a carrying value of
$87.8
million (after the basis adjustment for the related allowance for finance receivable losses). As a result of the sale, we deconsolidated the securitization trust holding the underlying real estate loans and previously issued securitized interests which were reported in long-term debt, as we no longer were considered the primary beneficiary.
The “Securitization Assets Sale”
On August 6, 2014, SFC and Eighth Street Funding, LLC, Eleventh Street Funding, LLC, Twelfth Street Funding, LLC, Fourteenth Street Funding, LLC, Fifteenth Street Funding, LLC, Seventeenth Street Funding, LLC, and Nineteenth Street Funding, LLC (each a wholly owned subsidiary of SFC and collectively, the “Depositors”) entered into an agreement to sell,
9
Table of Contents
subject to certain closing conditions, certain notes and trust certificates (collectively, the “Securities”) backed by mortgage loans of the Springleaf Mortgage Loan Trust (“SMLT”) 2011-1, SMLT 2012-1, SMLT 2012-2, SMLT 2012-3, SMLT 2013-1, SMLT 2013-2, and SMLT 2013-3 (each, a “Trust”, and the issuance of the Securities by each Trust, a “Springleaf Transaction”) to Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and its affiliates (“Credit Suisse”). The agreement also included the sale of the rights to receive any funds remaining in the reserve account established for each Springleaf Transaction, and certain related rights, representing substantially all of the Company’s remaining interests in the Trusts, to Credit Suisse.
On August 1, 2014, the real estate loans included in the transaction were transferred from held for investment to held for sale, due to management’s intent to no longer hold these finance receivables for the foreseeable future. The Depositors completed this transaction on August 29, 2014, at which time, the real estate loans included in the transaction had a carrying value of
$4.0 billion
(after the basis adjustment for the related allowance for finance receivable losses). The purchase price for the Securitization Asset Sale was
$1.6 billion
. As a result of the sale, we deconsolidated the securitization trusts holding the underlying real estate loans and previously issued securitized interests which were reported in long-term debt, as we no longer were considered the primary beneficiary.
The “MSR Sale”
Additionally, in a separate transaction on August 6, 2014, SFC and its wholly owned subsidiary, MorEquity, Inc. (“MorEquity”) (collectively, the “Sellers”), entered into a Mortgage Servicing Rights Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated and effective as of August 1, 2014, with Nationstar Mortgage LLC (“Nationstar”), pursuant to which the Sellers agreed to sell to Nationstar all of their rights and responsibilities as servicer, primary servicer, and/or master servicer of the mortgage loans primarily underlying the Sellers’ securitizations completed in 2011, 2012 and 2013 (each a “Pool” and collectively, the “Pools”) with an aggregate unpaid principal balance (“UPB”) of approximately
$5 billion
. Additionally, Nationstar agreed to assume on and after the effective date, all of the Sellers’ rights and responsibilities as servicer, primary servicer and/or master servicer, as applicable, for each Pool arising and to be performed on and after the sale date, which include, among other things, the right to receive the related servicing fee on a monthly basis.
The purchase price for the MSR Sale was
$38.8 million
. Approximately
50%
of the proceeds of the MSR Sale were received on August 29, 2014, the closing date, and
40%
of the proceeds of the MSR Sale were received on October 23, 2014. The remaining
10%
is subject to a holdback for resolution of missing documentation and other customary conditions, and is expected to be received no later than
120 days
after the date of transfer of servicing upon resolution of those conditions. See Note 20 for further information on the subsequent payment received from Nationstar on October 23, 2014. Investment funds managed by affiliates of Fortress indirectly own a majority interest in Nationstar.
The servicing for each Pool was transferred on
September 30, 2014
. From the closing of the MSR Sale on August 29, 2014, until the servicing transfer on
September 30, 2014
, the Company continued to service certain loans on behalf of Nationstar under an interim servicing agreement.
The “September Whole Loan Sales”
On August 6, 2014, SFC and Credit Suisse agreed to the terms of sale of certain performing and non-performing mortgage loans by certain indirect subsidiaries of SHI (referred to herein as the “Probable Whole Loan Sales”). On August 1, 2014, the real estate loans included in the Probable Whole Loan Sales were transferred from held for investment to held for sale, due to management’s intent to no longer hold these finance receivables for the foreseeable future. We completed the sale of a portion of the Probable Whole Loan Sales on
September 30, 2014
(the “September Whole Loan Sales”) at which time, the real estate loans included in the September Whole Loan Sales had a carrying value of
$768.6 million
(after the basis adjustment for the related allowance for finance receivable losses).
The aggregate purchase price of
$795.1 million
for the September Whole Loan Sales included a holdback provision of $
120 million
of which $
40 million
was subject to finalization of the terms and conditions of administering the holdback and the remainder was subject to our ability to cure certain documentation deficiencies within the
60
day period (subject to extension under certain circumstances) subsequent to the closing of the sale. See Note 20 for further information on the subsequent payments received from Credit Suisse on October 16 and November 7, 2014.
10
Table of Contents
Prior Dispositions
The “Prior Dispositions” included the following transactions:
The “Sixth Street Disposition”.
On May 23, 2014, Sixth Street Funding LLC (“Sixth Street”), a wholly owned subsidiary of SFC, agreed to sell and transfer its beneficial interests in the mortgage-backed retained certificates related to a securitization transaction completed in 2010 to Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“MLPFS”) for a purchase price of
$263.7 million
. On June 1, 2014, the real estate loans included in the transaction were transferred from held for investment to held for sale, due to management’s intent to no longer hold these finance receivables for the foreseeable future. Sixth Street completed this transaction on June 30, 2014, at which time, the real estate loans included in the transaction had a carrying value of
$444.4 million
(after the basis adjustment for the related allowance for finance receivable losses). As a result of the sale, we deconsolidated the securitization trust holding the underlying real estate loans and previously issued securitized interests which were reported in long-term debt, as we no longer were considered the primary beneficiary.
The “Third Street Disposition”.
On March 6, 2014, Third Street Funding LLC (“Third Street”), a wholly owned subsidiary of SFC, agreed to sell and transfer its beneficial interests in the mortgage-backed retained certificates related to a securitization transaction completed in 2009 to MLPFS for a purchase price of
$737.2 million
. On March 1, 2014, the real estate loans included in the transaction were transferred from held for investment to held for sale, due to management’s intent to no longer hold these finance receivables for the foreseeable future. Third Street completed this transaction on
March 31, 2014, at which time, the real estate loans included in the transaction had a carrying value of
$724.9 million
(after the basis adjustment for the related allowance for finance receivable losses). As a result of the sale, we deconsolidated the securitization trust holding the underlying real estate loans and previously issued securitized interests which were reported in long-term debt, as we no longer were considered the primary beneficiary.
The “MorEquity Disposition”.
On March 7, 2014, MorEquity entered into an agreement to sell, subject to certain closing conditions, certain performing and non-performing real estate loans for a purchase price of
$79.0 million
. On March 1, 2014, these loans were transferred from held for investment to held for sale, due to management’s intent to no longer hold these finance receivables for the foreseeable future. MorEquity completed this sale on March 31, 2014, at which time, the real estate loans included in the transaction had a carrying value of
$89.9 million
(after the basis adjustment for the related allowance for finance receivable losses).
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS ADOPTED
Income Taxes
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standards update (“ASU”), ASU 2013-11,
Income Taxes (Topic 740)
, which clarifies the presentation requirements of unrecognized tax benefits when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists at the reporting date. The amendments in this ASU became effective prospectively for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material effect on our consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS TO BE ADOPTED
Troubled Debt Restructurings
In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-04,
Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure
, which clarifies when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs — that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan receivable should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. The ASU requires a creditor to reclassify a collateralized consumer mortgage loan to real estate property upon obtaining legal title to the real estate collateral, or the borrower voluntarily conveying all interest in the real estate property to the lender to satisfy the loan through a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. We are currently evaluating whether the adoption of this ASU will have a material effect on our consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
11
Table of Contents
Revenue from Contracts
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
, which provides a consistent revenue accounting model across industries. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2016. Many of our revenue sources are not within the scope of this new standard and we are currently evaluating whether the adoption of this ASU for those revenue sources that are in scope will have a material effect on our consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Share-based Payments
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-12,
Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period
, which clarifies that performance targets within share-based payment awards that can be met after the requisite service period should be considered performance conditions that affect vesting. The ASU is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. We have evaluated this ASU and concluded that it is not applicable to the Company at this time.
Going Concern
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15,
Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
, which requires management to assess a company’s ability to continue as a going concern for each annual and interim reporting period, and disclose in its financial statements whether there is substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The new standard applies to all companies and is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and all annual and interim periods thereafter. The new standard can also be early adopted. Upon adoption, we will perform the going concern assessment in accordance with the requirements of the new ASU.
ACCOUNTING POLICY ELECTIONS
We made certain policy elections with regard to the issuance of long-term debt related to a consumer loan securitization completed on March 26, 2014 (the “2014-A securitization”) and have updated our long-term debt policy previously disclosed in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K to reflect these elections going forward. The updated long-term debt policy is presented below:
Long-term Debt
We generally report our long-term debt issuances at the face value of the debt instrument, which we adjust for any unaccreted discount or unamortized premium associated with the debt. We make policy elections on a security by security basis with regard to the methodology used to accrete discounts and premiums. Other than securitized products, we generally accrete discounts and premiums over the contractual life of the security using contractual payment terms. With respect to securitized products, we have historically elected to use estimated prepayment patterns adjusted for changes in estimate over the estimated life of the debt. However, in certain circumstances, including our policy election for the 2014-A securitization, we elect to amortize deferred items over the contractual life of the security. Under either treatment, such accretion is recorded to interest expense. Additionally, we generally accrete other deferred amounts (e.g. issuance costs) following the same method elected on the associated unaccreted discount or premium.
2. Finance Receivables
Our finance receivable types include personal loans, the SpringCastle Portfolio, real estate loans, and retail sales finance as defined below:
•
Personal loans —
are secured by consumer goods, automobiles, or other personal property or are unsecured, generally have maximum original terms of
four years
, and are usually fixed-rate, fixed-term loans. At
September 30, 2014
,
$1.7 billion
of personal loans, or
48%
, were secured by collateral consisting of titled personal property (such as automobiles),
$1.3 billion
, or
37%
, were secured by consumer household goods or other items of personal property, and the remainder was unsecured.
12
Table of Contents
•
SpringCastle Portfolio —
are loans jointly acquired from HSBC Finance Corporation and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “HSBC”) on April 1, 2013 through a joint venture in which we own a
47%
equity interest. These loans include unsecured loans and loans secured by subordinate residential real estate mortgages (which we service as unsecured loans due to the fact that the liens are subordinated to superior ranking security interests). The SpringCastle Portfolio includes both closed-end accounts and open-end lines of credit. These loans are in a liquidating status and vary in substance and form from our originated loans.
•
Real estate loans —
are secured by first or second mortgages on residential real estate, generally have maximum original terms of
360 months
, and are considered non-conforming. At
September 30, 2014
,
$233.8 million
of real estate loans, or
36%
, were secured by first mortgages and
$421.5 million
, or
64%
, were secured by second mortgages. Real estate loans may be closed-end accounts or open-end home equity lines of credit and are primarily fixed-rate products.
•
Retail sales finance —
includes retail sales contracts and revolving retail accounts. Retail sales contracts are closed-end accounts that represent a single purchase transaction. Revolving retail accounts are open-end accounts that can be used for financing repeated purchases from the same merchant. Retail sales contracts are secured by the personal property designated in the contract and generally have maximum original terms of
60 months
. Revolving retail accounts are secured by the goods purchased and generally require minimum monthly payments based on the amount financed calculated after the most recent purchase or outstanding balances. In January 2013, we ceased purchasing retail sales contracts and revolving retail accounts.
Components of net finance receivables by type were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Personal
Loans
SpringCastle
Portfolio
Real
Estate Loans
Retail
Sales Finance
Total
September 30, 2014
Gross receivables*
$
4,209,056
$
2,067,719
$
652,839
$
62,342
$
6,991,956
Unearned finance charges and points and fees
(696,696
)
—
(3,260
)
(5,922
)
(705,878
)
Accrued finance charges
52,688
15,426
5,625
480
74,219
Deferred origination costs
42,161
—
95
—
42,256
Total
$
3,607,209
$
2,083,145
$
655,299
$
56,900
$
6,402,553
December 31, 2013
Gross receivables*
$
3,644,030
$
2,484,719
$
7,940,500
$
108,457
$
14,177,706
Unearned finance charges and points and fees
(560,104
)
—
(1,115
)
(10,444
)
(571,663
)
Accrued finance charges
48,179
20,630
42,690
898
112,397
Deferred origination costs
39,599
—
274
—
39,873
Total
$
3,171,704
$
2,505,349
$
7,982,349
$
98,911
$
13,758,313
*
Gross receivables are defined as follows:
•
finance receivables purchased as a performing receivable
— gross finance receivables equal the UPB for interest bearing accounts and the gross remaining contractual payments for precompute accounts; additionally, the remaining unearned discount, net of premium established at the time of purchase is included in both interest bearing and precompute accounts to reflect the finance receivable balance at its fair value;
•
finance receivables originated subsequent to the Fortress Acquisition
— gross finance receivables equal the UPB for interest bearing accounts and the gross remaining contractual payments for precompute accounts; and
•
purchased credit impaired finance receivables
— gross finance receivables equal the remaining estimated cash flows less the current balance of accretable yield on the purchased credit impaired accounts.
13
Table of Contents
Included in the table above are personal loans with a carrying value of
$1.8 billion
at
September 30, 2014
and
$1.6 billion
at
December 31, 2013
and SpringCastle Portfolio loans with a carrying value of
$2.1 billion
at
September 30, 2014
and
$2.5 billion
at
December 31, 2013
associated with securitizations that remain on our balance sheet. Also included in the table above are real estate loans with a carrying value of
$5.7 billion
at
December 31, 2013
associated with mortgage securitizations that have been sold or transferred to finance receivables held for sale during the nine months ended
September 30, 2014
. See Note 1 for further information on these sales. The carrying value of consolidated long-term debt associated with securitizations totaled
$3.1 billion
at
September 30, 2014
and
$7.3 billion
at
December 31, 2013
. See Note 8 for further discussion regarding our securitization transactions. Also included in the table above are finance receivables with a carrying value of
$1.0 billion
at
December 31, 2013
, which were pledged as collateral for our secured term loan that we fully repaid in March 2014. See Note 7 for further discussion of the repayment of our secured term loan.
Unused lines of credit extended to customers by the Company were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
Personal loans
$
1,462
$
4,996
SpringCastle Portfolio
357,914
366,060
Real estate loans
30,437
32,338
Total
$
389,813
$
403,394
Unused lines of credit on our personal loans can be suspended if one of the following occurs: the value of the collateral declines significantly; we believe the borrower will be unable to fulfill the repayment obligations; or any other default by the borrower of any material obligation under the agreement. Unused lines of credit on our real estate loans and the SpringCastle Portfolio secured by subordinate residential real estate mortgages can be suspended if one of the following occurs: (1) the value of the real estate declines significantly below the property’s initial appraised value; (2) we believe the borrower will be unable to fulfill the repayment obligations because of a material change in the borrower’s financial circumstances; or (3) any other default by the borrower of any material obligation under the agreement occurs. Unused lines of credit on home equity lines of credit, including the SpringCastle Portfolio secured by subordinate residential real estate mortgages, can be terminated for delinquency. Unused lines of credit on the unsecured loans of the SpringCastle Portfolio can be terminated at our discretion.
CREDIT QUALITY INDICATORS
We consider the delinquency status and nonperforming status of the finance receivable as our credit quality indicators.
We accrue finance charges on revolving retail finance receivables up to the date of charge-off at
180 days
past due. We had
$0.1 million
of revolving retail finance receivables that were more than 90 days past due and still accruing finance charges at
September 30, 2014
, compared to
$0.4 million
at
December 31, 2013
. Our personal loans, SpringCastle Portfolio, and real estate loans do not have finance receivables that were more than 90 days past due and still accruing finance charges.
14
Table of Contents
Delinquent Finance Receivables
We consider the delinquency status of the finance receivable as our primary credit quality indicator. We monitor delinquency trends to manage our exposure to credit risk. We consider finance receivables 60 days or more past due as delinquent and consider the likelihood of collection to decrease at such time.
The following is a summary of net finance receivables by type and by days delinquent:
(dollars in thousands)
Personal
Loans
SpringCastle
Portfolio
Real
Estate Loans
Retail
Sales Finance
Total
September 30, 2014
Net finance receivables:
60-89 days past due
$
32,384
$
33,379
$
13,151
$
770
$
79,684
90-119 days past due
25,688
20,955
7,842
429
54,914
120-149 days past due
21,132
15,826
5,629
558
43,145
150-179 days past due
16,727
13,102
5,557
303
35,689
180 days or more past due
1,088
4,946
11,947
46
18,027
Total delinquent finance receivables
97,019
88,208
44,126
2,106
231,459
Current
3,456,829
1,932,945
588,796
53,522
6,032,092
30-59 days past due
53,361
61,992
22,377
1,272
139,002
Total
$
3,607,209
$
2,083,145
$
655,299
$
56,900
$
6,402,553
December 31, 2013
Net finance receivables:
60-89 days past due
$
28,504
$
60,669
$
97,567
$
1,290
$
188,030
90-119 days past due
22,804
47,689
68,190
1,017
139,700
120-149 days past due
18,780
33,671
55,222
757
108,430
150-179 days past due
14,689
26,828
45,158
740
87,415
180 days or more past due
938
3,579
356,766
173
361,456
Total delinquent finance receivables
85,715
172,436
622,903
3,977
885,031
Current
3,038,307
2,232,965
7,183,437
92,093
12,546,802
30-59 days past due
47,682
99,948
176,009
2,841
326,480
Total
$
3,171,704
$
2,505,349
$
7,982,349
$
98,911
$
13,758,313
15
Table of Contents
Nonperforming Finance Receivables
We also monitor finance receivable performance trends to evaluate the potential risk of future credit losses. At 90 days or more past due, we consider our finance receivables to be nonperforming. Once the finance receivables are considered as nonperforming, we consider them to be at increased risk for credit loss.
Our performing and nonperforming net finance receivables by type were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Personal
Loans
SpringCastle
Portfolio
Real
Estate Loans
Retail
Sales Finance
Total
September 30, 2014
Performing
$
3,542,574
$
2,028,316
$
624,324
$
55,564
$
6,250,778
Nonperforming
64,635
54,829
30,975
1,336
151,775
Total
$
3,607,209
$
2,083,145
$
655,299
$
56,900
$
6,402,553
December 31, 2013
Performing
$
3,114,493
$
2,393,582
$
7,457,013
$
96,224
$
13,061,312
Nonperforming
57,211
111,767
525,336
2,687
697,001
Total
$
3,171,704
$
2,505,349
$
7,982,349
$
98,911
$
13,758,313
PURCHASED CREDIT IMPAIRED FINANCE RECEIVABLES
As a result of the Fortress Acquisition, we applied push-down accounting and adjusted the carrying value of our finance receivables (the “FA Loans”) to their fair value on November 30, 2010.
In connection with the acquisition of the SpringCastle Portfolio (the “SCP Loans”), we recorded the acquired loans at their fair value of
$748.9 million
on April 1, 2013, the day of purchase, and determined at this date that these loans with contractually required principal and interest of
$1.9 billion
and expected undiscounted cash flows of
$1.2 billion
were credit impaired.
We include the carrying amount (which initially was the fair value) of our purchased credit impaired finance receivables in net finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses. Prepayments reduce the outstanding balance, contractual cash flows, and cash flows expected to be collected.
We report finance receivables held for sale of
$493.2 million
at September 30, 2014, which consist of our non-core real estate loans. See Note 4 for further information on our finance receivables held for sale. At September 30, 2014, finance receivables held for sale include purchased credit impaired real estate loans, as well as troubled debt restructured (“TDR”) real estate loans. Therefore, we are presenting the financial information for the purchased credit impaired finance receivables and the TDR finance receivables by finance receivables held for investment and finance receivables held for sale in the tables below.
16
Table of Contents
Information regarding these purchased credit impaired finance receivables held for investment and held for sale were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
SCP Loans
FA Loans
Total
September 30, 2014
Carrying amount, net of allowance (a)
$
370,967
$
191,725
$
562,692
Outstanding balance (b)
$
682,389
$
300,128
$
982,517
Allowance for purchased credit impaired finance receivable losses
$
—
$
4,513
$
4,513
December 31, 2013
Carrying amount, net of allowance
$
530,326
$
1,257,047
$
1,787,373
Outstanding balance
$
851,211
$
1,791,882
$
2,643,093
Allowance for purchased credit impaired finance receivable losses
$
—
$
57,334
$
57,334
(a)
The carrying amount of purchased credit impaired finance receivables at
September 30, 2014
includes
$165.5 million
of purchased credit impaired finance receivables held for sale.
(b)
The outstanding balance of purchased credit impaired finance receivables at
September 30, 2014
includes
$246.1 million
of purchased credit impaired finance receivables held for sale.
The allowance for purchased credit impaired finance receivable losses at
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, reflected the net carrying value of these purchased credit impaired finance receivables being higher than the present value of the expected cash flows.
17
Table of Contents
Changes in accretable yield for purchased credit impaired finance receivables held for investment and held for sale were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
SCP Loans
FA Loans
Total
At or for the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Balance at beginning of period
$
267,251
$
627,125
$
894,376
Accretion (a)
(15,791
)
(20,771
)
(36,562
)
Transfers due to finance receivables sold
—
(563,891
)
(563,891
)
Disposals of finance receivables (b)
(5,039
)
(3,640
)
(8,679
)
Balance at end of period
$
246,421
$
38,823
$
285,244
At or for the Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013
Balance at beginning of period
$
407,237
$
849,153
$
1,256,390
Accretion
(25,887
)
(32,224
)
(58,111
)
Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference (c)
—
2,741
2,741
Disposals of finance receivables (b)
(19,078
)
(8,471
)
(27,549
)
Balance at end of period
$
362,272
$
811,199
$
1,173,471
At or for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Balance at beginning of period
$
325,201
$
771,491
$
1,096,692
Accretion (a)
(53,514
)
(76,326
)
(129,840
)
Reclassifications to nonaccretable difference (c)
(527
)
—
(527
)
Transfers due to finance receivables sold
—
(641,559
)
(641,559
)
Disposals of finance receivables (b)
(24,739
)
(14,783
)
(39,522
)
Balance at end of period
$
246,421
$
38,823
$
285,244
At or for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013
Balance at beginning of period
$
—
$
629,200
$
629,200
Additions
437,604
—
437,604
Accretion
(54,190
)
(97,616
)
(151,806
)
Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference (c)
—
304,575
304,575
Disposals of finance receivables (b)
(21,142
)
(24,960
)
(46,102
)
Balance at end of period
$
362,272
$
811,199
$
1,173,471
(a)
Accretion on our purchased credit impaired finance receivables for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2014
includes
$11.2 million
and
$11.4 million
, respectively, of accretion on purchased credit impaired finance receivables held for sale, which is reported as interest income on finance receivables held for sale originated as held for investment.
(b)
Disposals of finance receivables represent finance charges forfeited due to purchased credit impaired finance receivables charged-off during the period.
(c)
Reclassifications from (to) nonaccretable difference represent the increases (decreases) in accretion resulting from higher (lower) estimated undiscounted cash flows.
18
Table of Contents
TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURED FINANCE RECEIVABLES
Information regarding TDR finance receivables held for investment and held for sale were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Real Estate Loans
September 30, 2014
TDR gross finance receivables (a) (b)
$
334,141
TDR net finance receivables (c)
$
335,512
Allowance for TDR finance receivable losses
$
31,205
December 31, 2013
TDR gross finance receivables (a)
$
1,375,230
TDR net finance receivables
$
1,380,223
Allowance for TDR finance receivable losses
$
176,455
(a)
As defined earlier in this Note.
(b)
TDR gross finance receivables at
September 30, 2014
include
$230.7 million
of TDR finance receivables held for sale.
(c)
TDR net finance receivables at
September 30, 2014
includes
$231.6 million
of TDR finance receivables held for sale.
We have
no
commitments to lend additional funds on our TDR finance receivables.
TDR average net receivables held for investment and held for sale and finance charges recognized on TDR finance receivables held for investment and held for sale were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Revised
Revised
Real Estate Loans
TDR average net receivables (a)
$
799,353
$
1,206,729
$
1,194,193
$
1,055,652
TDR finance charges recognized (b)
$
10,071
$
16,736
$
44,896
$
45,792
(a)
TDR average net receivables for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
include
$411.1 million
of TDR average net receivables held for sale, which reflect a two-month average since the real estate loans were transferred to finance receivables held for sale on August 1, 2014.
(b)
TDR finance charges recognized for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
include
$3.1 million
of interest income on TDR finance receivables held for sale.
The impact of the transfers of finance receivables held for investment to finance receivables held for sale and the subsequent sales of finance receivables held for sale during the first half of 2014 was immaterial since the loans were transferred and sold within the same months.
19
Table of Contents
Information regarding the new volume of the TDR finance receivables held for investment and held for sale were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Revised
Revised
Real Estate Loans
Number of TDR accounts (a)
405
1,621
2,301
5,773
Pre-modification TDR net finance receivables (b)
$
28,665
$
131,865
$
211,088
$
451,697
Post-modification TDR net finance receivables (b)
$
29,348
$
140,333
$
200,154
$
483,233
(a)
Number of new TDR accounts for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
includes
89
new TDR accounts that were held for sale.
(b)
TDR net finance receivables for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
include
$6.0 million
of pre-modification and
$6.5 million
of post-modification TDR net finance receivables held for sale.
Net finance receivables held for investment and held for sale that were modified as TDR finance receivables within the previous 12 months and for which there was a default during the period to cause the TDR finance receivables to be considered nonperforming (90 days or more past due) were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Revised
Revised
Real Estate Loans
Number of TDR accounts (a)
54
370
488
797
TDR net finance receivables (a) (b)
$
2,788
$
25,848
$
31,465
$
59,809
(a)
Number and amount of TDR net finance receivables for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
that defaulted during the previous 12 month period include
30
TDR accounts that were held for sale totaling
$1.8 million
.
(b)
Represents the corresponding balance of TDR net finance receivables at the end of the month in which they defaulted.
20
Table of Contents
3. Allowance for Finance Receivable Losses
Changes in the allowance for finance receivable losses by finance receivable type were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Personal
Loans
SpringCastle
Portfolio
Real
Estate Loans
Retail
Sales Finance
Consolidated Total
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Balance at beginning of period
$
107,030
$
710
$
259,182
$
1,350
$
368,272
Provision for finance receivable losses (a)
57,990
28,330
15,982
669
102,971
Charge-offs
(47,625
)
(31,533
)
(13,159
)
(1,199
)
(93,516
)
Recoveries
7,094
2,812
962
374
11,242
Reduction in the carrying value of real estate loans transferred to finance receivables held for sale (b)
—
—
(225,333
)
—
(225,333
)
Balance at end of period
$
124,489
$
319
$
37,634
$
1,194
$
163,636
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013 - Revised
Balance at beginning of period
$
60,250
$
—
$
180,565
$
920
$
241,735
Provision for finance receivable losses (a)
39,747
60,662
60,012
1,843
162,264
Charge-offs
(32,528
)
(61,470
)
(33,384
)
(2,032
)
(129,414
)
Recoveries
2,136
2,210
1,326
294
5,966
Balance at end of period
$
69,605
$
1,402
$
208,519
$
1,025
$
280,551
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Balance at beginning of period
$
94,880
$
1,056
$
235,549
$
1,840
$
333,325
Provision for finance receivable losses (a)
151,445
121,680
103,408
2,663
379,196
Charge-offs
(139,450
)
(133,044
)
(67,099
)
(4,310
)
(343,903
)
Recoveries (c)
17,614
10,627
5,788
1,001
35,030
Reduction in the carrying value of real estate loans transferred to finance receivables held for sale (b)
—
—
(240,012
)
—
(240,012
)
Balance at end of period
$
124,489
$
319
$
37,634
$
1,194
$
163,636
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013 - Revised
Balance at beginning of period
$
66,580
$
—
$
113,813
$
2,260
$
182,653
Provision for finance receivable losses (a)
64,344
78,459
200,492
(4,234
)
339,061
Charge-offs (d)
(106,162
)
(79,267
)
(121,398
)
(7,338
)
(314,165
)
Recoveries (e)
44,843
2,210
15,612
10,337
73,002
Balance at end of period
$
69,605
$
1,402
$
208,519
$
1,025
$
280,551
21
Table of Contents
(a)
Components of provision for finance receivable losses on our real estate loans were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Revised
Revised
Real estate loans
Provision for finance receivable losses
Non-credit impaired finance receivables
$
6,246
$
17,946
$
32,266
$
63,037
Purchased credit impaired finance receivables
3,009
21,191
28,785
60,708
TDR finance receivables
6,727
20,875
42,357
76,747
Total
$
15,982
$
60,012
$
103,408
$
200,492
(b)
During the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, we reduced the carrying value of certain real estate loans to
$5.4 billion
and
$6.7 billion
, respectively, as a result of the transfers of these loans from finance receivables held for investment to finance receivables held for sale due to management’s intent to no longer hold these finance receivables for the foreseeable future.
(c)
Recoveries during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
included
$2.2 million
of real estate loan recoveries resulting from a sale of previously charged-off real estate loans in March 2014, net of a
$0.2 million
reserve for subsequent buybacks.
(d)
Effective March 31, 2013, we charge off to the allowance for finance receivable losses personal loans that are
180 days
past due. Previously, we charged-off to the allowance for finance receivable losses personal loans on which payments received in the prior six months totaled less than
5%
of the original loan amount. As a result of this change, we recorded
$13.3 million
of additional charge-offs in March 2013.
(e)
Recoveries during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
included
$39.6 million
(
$23.8 million
of personal loan recoveries,
$9.9 million
of real estate loan recoveries, and
$5.9 million
of retail sales finance recoveries) resulting from a sale of previously charged-off finance receivables in June 2013, net of a
$1.6 million
adjustment for the subsequent buyback of certain finance receivables.
Included in the allowance for finance receivable losses are allowances associated with securitizations that totaled
$67.8 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$153.7 million
at
December 31, 2013
. See Note 8 for further discussion regarding our securitization transactions.
The carrying value charged-off for purchased credit impaired loans was as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Charged-off against provision for finance receivable losses:
SCP Loans
$
7,837
$
31,544
$
39,368
$
48,717
FA Loans gross charge-offs*
$
2,017
$
10,074
$
14,944
$
31,737
*
Represents additional impairment recognized, subsequent to the establishment of the pools of purchased credit impaired loans, related to loans that have been foreclosed and transferred to real estate owned status.
22
Table of Contents
The allowance for finance receivable losses and net finance receivables by type and by impairment method were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Personal
Loans
SpringCastle
Portfolio
Real
Estate Loans
Retail
Sales Finance
Total
September 30, 2014
Allowance for finance receivable losses for finance receivables:
Collectively evaluated for impairment
$
124,489
$
319
$
1,916
$
1,194
$
127,918
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality (purchased credit impaired finance receivables)
—
—
4,513
—
4,513
Individually evaluated for impairment (TDR finance receivables)
—
—
31,205
—
31,205
Total
$
124,489
$
319
$
37,634
$
1,194
$
163,636
Finance receivables:
Collectively evaluated for impairment
$
3,607,209
$
1,712,178
$
520,712
$
56,900
$
5,896,999
Purchased credit impaired finance receivables
—
370,967
30,697
—
401,664
TDR finance receivables
—
—
103,890
—
103,890
Total
$
3,607,209
$
2,083,145
$
655,299
$
56,900
$
6,402,553
December 31, 2013
Allowance for finance receivable losses for finance receivables:
Collectively evaluated for impairment
$
94,880
$
1,056
$
1,760
$
1,840
$
99,536
Purchased credit impaired finance receivables
—
—
57,334
—
57,334
TDR finance receivables
—
—
176,455
—
176,455
Total
$
94,880
$
1,056
$
235,549
$
1,840
$
333,325
Finance receivables:
Collectively evaluated for impairment
$
3,171,704
$
1,975,023
$
5,287,745
$
98,911
$
10,533,383
Purchased credit impaired finance receivables
—
530,326
1,314,381
—
1,844,707
TDR finance receivables
—
—
1,380,223
—
1,380,223
Total
$
3,171,704
$
2,505,349
$
7,982,349
$
98,911
$
13,758,313
4. Finance Receivables Held for Sale
We report finance receivables held for sale of
$493.2 million
at September 30, 2014, which are carried at lower of cost or fair value. We used the aggregate basis to determine the lower of cost or fair value of the finance receivables held for sale since the underlying real estate loans were presented to the buyers on a portfolio basis. We also separately present the interest income on our finance receivables held for sale as interest income on finance receivables held for sale originated as held for investment on our interim consolidated statements of operations, which totaled
$47.7 million
and
$54.9 million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.
On August 1, 2014, we transferred real estate loans with a carrying value of
$5.4 billion
(after the basis adjustment for the related allowance for finance receivable losses) from finance receivables held for investment to held for sale due to management’s intent to no longer hold these finance receivables for the foreseeable future. On August 29, 2014, we sold finance receivables held for sale with a carrying value of
$4.0 billion
and related trust assets and recorded a net gain at the time of sale of
$604.9 million
primarily resulting from the reversal of the remaining unaccreted push-down accounting basis for these finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses that we established at the date of the Fortress Acquisition. The net gain on this sale included proceeds of
$38.8 million
from the related MSR Sale. On
September 30, 2014
,
23
Table of Contents
we sold finance receivables held for sale with a carrying value of
$856.4 million
and related trust assets and recorded a net gain at the time of sale of
$36.5 million
primarily resulting from the reversal of the remaining unaccreted push-down accounting basis for these finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses that we established at the date of the Fortress Acquisition.
On June 1, 2014, we transferred real estate loans with a carrying value of
$451.2 million
(after the basis adjustment for the related allowance for finance receivable losses) from finance receivables held for investment to held for sale due to management’s intent to no longer hold these finance receivables for the foreseeable future. On June 30, 2014, we sold finance receivables held for sale with a carrying value of
$444.4 million
and related trust assets and recorded a net gain at the time of sale of
$34.8 million
primarily resulting from the reversal of the remaining unaccreted push-down accounting basis for these finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses that we established at the date of the Fortress Acquisition.
On March 1, 2014, we transferred real estate loans with a carrying value of
$825.2 million
(after the basis adjustment for the related allowance for finance receivable losses) from finance receivables held for investment to held for sale due to management’s intent to no longer hold these finance receivables for the foreseeable future. On March 31, 2014, we sold finance receivables held for sale with a carrying value of
$814.8 million
and related trust assets and recorded a net gain at the time of sale of
$55.2 million
primarily resulting from the reversal of the remaining unaccreted push-down accounting basis for these finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses that we established at the date of the Fortress Acquisition.
See Note 1 for further information on these sales. We did not have any transfer activity between finance receivables held for investment to finance receivables held for sale during the first nine months of
2013
.
LOAN REPURCHASES
We repurchased
four
loans for
$0.6 million
during the three months ended
September 30, 2014
and
nine
loans for $
1.5 million
during the nine months ended
September 30, 2014
. We repurchased
two
loans for
$0.3 million
during the three months ended
September 30, 2013
and
19
loans for
$2.8 million
during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
. In each period, we repurchased the loans that were previously sold to HSBC because these loans were reaching the defined delinquency limits or had breached the contractual representations and warranties under the loan sale agreements. At
September 30, 2014
, there were
no
unresolved recourse requests.
During the third quarter of
2014
, we established a reserve for sales recourse obligations of
$9.9 million
related to the sales of real estate loans with a total carrying value of
$6.1 billion
during the first
nine
months of
2014
. As of
September 30, 2014
, we had no repurchase activity or recourse losses associated with these sales. However, we will continue to monitor any repurchase activity in the future and will adjust the reserve accordingly.
The activity in our reserve for sales recourse obligations associated with the real estate loan sales during the first nine months of 2014 and the loans that were previously sold to HSBC were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
At or for the Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
At or for the Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
At or for the Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
At or for the Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Balance at beginning of period
$
4,724
$
4,766
$
4,702
$
4,863
Provision for recourse obligations
8,543
—
8,706
322
Recourse losses
(70
)
(42
)
(211
)
(461
)
Balance at end of period
$
13,197
$
4,724
$
13,197
$
4,724
24
Table of Contents
5. Investment Securities
AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE SECURITIES
Cost/amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of available-for-sale securities by type were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Cost/
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
September 30, 2014
Fixed maturity available-for-sale securities:
Bonds:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
$
55,427
$
930
$
(159
)
$
56,198
Obligations of states, municipalities, and political subdivisions
115,916
2,618
(82
)
118,452
Corporate debt
258,172
11,466
(1,200
)
268,438
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed, and collateralized:
Residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”)
77,845
2,379
(42
)
80,182
Commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”)
23,231
83
(149
)
23,165
Collateralized debt obligations (“CDO”)/Asset-backed securities (“ABS”)
21,582
34
(51
)
21,565
Total
552,173
17,510
(1,683
)
568,000
Preferred stock
7,163
84
(204
)
7,043
Other long-term investments*
1,306
131
(7
)
1,430
Common stocks
850
—
—
850
Total
$
561,492
$
17,725
$
(1,894
)
$
577,323
December 31, 2013
Fixed maturity available-for-sale securities:
Bonds:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
$
59,800
$
565
$
(681
)
$
59,684
Obligations of states, municipalities, and political subdivisions
101,913
1,703
(80
)
103,536
Corporate debt
247,793
6,143
(2,191
)
251,745
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed, and collateralized:
RMBS
82,406
1,931
(559
)
83,778
CMBS
10,931
77
(32
)
10,976
CDO/ABS
10,200
23
(26
)
10,197
Total
513,043
10,442
(3,569
)
519,916
Preferred stock
7,844
—
(39
)
7,805
Other long-term investments*
1,394
—
(125
)
1,269
Common stocks
850
—
—
850
Total
$
523,131
$
10,442
$
(3,733
)
$
529,840
*
Excludes interest in a limited partnership that we account for using the equity method (
$0.5 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$0.6 million
at
December 31, 2013
).
25
Table of Contents
As of
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
, we had
no
available-for-sale securities with other-than-temporary impairments recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.
Fair value and unrealized losses on investment securities by type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position were as follows:
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Total
(dollars in thousands)
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
September 30, 2014
Bonds:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
$
17,827
$
(53
)
$
13,468
$
(106
)
$
31,295
$
(159
)
Obligations of states, municipalities, and political subdivisions
17,917
(54
)
1,053
(28
)
18,970
(82
)
Corporate debt
34,154
(358
)
15,356
(842
)
49,510
(1,200
)
RMBS
12,310
(19
)
2,635
(23
)
14,945
(42
)
CMBS
18,605
(149
)
166
—
18,771
(149
)
CDO/ABS
7,440
(51
)
223
—
7,663
(51
)
Total
108,253
(684
)
32,901
(999
)
141,154
(1,683
)
Preferred stock
6,019
(204
)
—
—
6,019
(204
)
Other long-term investments
—
—
104
(7
)
104
(7
)
Total
$
114,272
$
(888
)
$
33,005
$
(1,006
)
$
147,277
$
(1,894
)
December 31, 2013
Bonds:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
$
45,264
$
(681
)
$
—
$
—
$
45,264
$
(681
)
Obligations of states, municipalities, and political subdivisions
14,756
(80
)
—
—
14,756
(80
)
Corporate debt
71,312
(1,539
)
11,772
(652
)
83,084
(2,191
)
RMBS
18,322
(559
)
—
—
18,322
(559
)
CMBS
5,517
(32
)
—
—
5,517
(32
)
CDO/ABS
5,123
(26
)
—
—
5,123
(26
)
Total
160,294
(2,917
)
11,772
(652
)
172,066
(3,569
)
Preferred stock
7,805
(39
)
—
—
7,805
(39
)
Other long-term investments
1,269
(125
)
—
—
1,269
(125
)
Total
$
169,368
$
(3,081
)
$
11,772
$
(652
)
$
181,140
$
(3,733
)
We continue to monitor unrealized loss positions for potential impairments. During the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, we did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairment credit loss write-downs to investment revenues. During the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
, we recognized other-than-temporary impairment credit loss write-downs to investment revenues on RMBS totaling
$26 thousand
.
26
Table of Contents
Changes in the cumulative amount of credit losses (recognized in earnings) on other-than-temporarily impaired available-for-sale securities were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
At or for the Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
At or for the Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
At or for the Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
At or for the Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Balance at beginning of period
$
1,318
$
1,523
$
1,523
$
1,650
Additions:
Due to other-than-temporary impairments:
Impairment previously recognized
—
—
—
26
Reductions:
Realized due to dispositions with no prior intention to sell
—
—
(205
)
(153
)
Balance at end of period
$
1,318
$
1,523
$
1,318
$
1,523
The fair values of available-for-sale securities sold or redeemed and the resulting realized gains, realized losses, and net realized gains (losses) were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Revised
Revised
Fair value
$
107,327
$
51,241
$
214,811
$
491,188
Realized gains
$
4,619
$
174
$
7,217
$
3,203
Realized losses
(71
)
(270
)
(343
)
(665
)
Net realized gains (losses)
$
4,548
$
(96
)
$
6,874
$
2,538
Contractual maturities of fixed-maturity available-for-sale securities at
September 30, 2014
were as follows:
Fair
Amortized
(dollars in thousands)
Value
Cost
Fixed maturities, excluding mortgage-backed, asset-backed, and collateralized securities:
Due in 1 year or less
$
29,862
$
29,267
Due after 1 year through 5 years
182,638
178,633
Due after 5 years through 10 years
94,638
93,428
Due after 10 years
135,950
128,187
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed, and collateralized securities
124,912
122,658
Total
$
568,000
$
552,173
Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. We may sell investment securities before maturity to achieve corporate requirements and investment strategies.
27
Table of Contents
TRADING SECURITIES
The fair value of trading securities by type was as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
Fixed maturity trading securities:
Bonds:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
$
136,681
$
—
Obligations of states, municipalities, and political subdivisions
88,407
—
Corporate debt
449,104
1,837
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed, and collateralized:
RMBS
65,103
10,671
CMBS
107,937
29,897
CDO/ABS
298,342
9,249
Total
$
1,145,574
$
51,654
The net unrealized and realized gains (losses) on our trading securities were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Revised
Revised
Net unrealized losses on trading securities held at period end
$
(2,044
)
$
(224
)
$
(1,128
)
$
(433
)
Net realized gains on trading securities sold or redeemed
246
63
273
174
Total
$
(1,798
)
$
(161
)
$
(855
)
$
(259
)
6. Transactions with Affiliates of Fortress or AIG
SUBSERVICING AND REFINANCE AGREEMENTS
Nationstar subservices the real estate loans of certain indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the “Owners”). Investment funds managed by affiliates of Fortress indirectly own a majority interest in Nationstar.
The Owners paid Nationstar fees for its subservicing and to facilitate the repayment of our real estate loans through refinancings with other lenders as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Subservicing fees
$
1,221
$
2,132
$
4,922
$
6,556
Refinancing concessions
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
265
As a result of the recent sales of our real estate loans, some of which were serviced by Nationstar, and the MSR Sale our exposure to these affiliated services is reduced.
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
Logan Circle Partners, L.P. (“Logan Circle”) provides investment management services for our investments. Logan Circle is a wholly owned subsidiary of Fortress. Costs and fees incurred for these investment management services totaled
$0.3 million
and
$0.8 million
for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, respectively, compared to
$0.2 million
and
$0.9 million
for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
, respectively.
28
Table of Contents
REINSURANCE AGREEMENTS
Merit Life Insurance Co. (“Merit”), our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, enters into reinsurance agreements with subsidiaries of AIG, for reinsurance of various group annuity, credit life, and credit accident and health insurance where Merit reinsures the risk of loss. The reserves for this business fluctuate over time and, in some instances, are subject to recapture by the insurer. Reserves recorded by Merit for reinsurance agreements with subsidiaries of AIG totaled
$43.9 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$45.6 million
at
December 31, 2013
.
JOINT VENTURE
Certain subsidiaries of New Residential Investment Corp. (“NRZ”), own a
30%
equity interest in the joint venture established in conjunction with the purchase of the SpringCastle Portfolio on April 1, 2013. NRZ is managed by an affiliate of Fortress.
THIRD STREET DISPOSITION
As discussed in Note 1, on March 6, 2014, we entered into an agreement to sell, subject to certain closing conditions, all of our interest in the mortgage-backed retained certificates related to a securitization transaction completed in 2009 to MLPFS for a price of
$737.2 million
. Concurrently, NRZ and MLPFS entered into an agreement pursuant to which NRZ agreed to purchase approximately
75%
of these retained certificates. NRZ is managed by an affiliate of Fortress. See Note 1 for further information on this sale.
MSR SALE
As discussed in Note 1, on August 6, 2014, SFC and MorEquity entered into an agreement, dated and effective August 1, 2014, to sell the servicing rights of the mortgage loans primarily underlying the mortgage securitizations completed during 2011 through 2013 to Nationstar for a purchase price of
$38.8 million
. Approximately
50%
of the proceeds of the MSR Sale were received on August 29, 2014, the closing date, and
40%
were received on October 23, 2014. See Note 1 and Note 20 for further information on the MSR Sale. Investment funds managed by affiliates of Fortress indirectly own a majority interest in Nationstar.
7. Long-term Debt
Principal maturities of long-term debt (excluding projected securitization repayments by period) by type of debt at
September 30, 2014
were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Retail
Notes
Medium
Term
Notes
Securitizations
Junior
Subordinated
Debt
Total
Interest rates (a)
6.00%-7.50%
5.40%-8.25%
1.76%-5.00%
6.00
%
Fourth quarter 2014
$
335,486
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
335,486
First quarter 2015
16,575
—
—
—
16,575
Second quarter 2015
7,092
—
—
—
7,092
Third quarter 2015
23,544
—
—
—
23,544
Remainder of 2015
—
750,000
—
—
750,000
2016
—
375,000
—
—
375,000
2017
—
2,360,837
—
—
2,360,837
2018
—
—
—
—
—
2019-2067
—
1,250,000
—
350,000
1,600,000
Securitizations (b)
—
—
3,055,588
—
3,055,588
Total principal maturities
$
382,697
$
4,735,837
$
3,055,588
$
350,000
$
8,524,122
Total carrying amount (c)
$
379,585
$
4,253,867
$
3,052,972
$
171,613
$
7,858,037
(a)
The interest rates shown are the range of contractual rates in effect at
September 30, 2014
.
29
Table of Contents
(b)
Securitizations are not included in above maturities by period due to their variable monthly repayments. See Note 8 for further information on our long-term debt associated with securitizations.
(c)
The net carrying amount of our long-term debt associated with certain securitizations that were either 1) issued at a premium or discount or 2) revalued at a premium or discount based on its fair value at the time of the Fortress Acquisition or 3) recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in circumstances when the embedded derivative within the securitization structure cannot be separately accounted for at fair value.
GUARANTY AGREEMENTS
On December 30, 2013, SHI entered into Guaranty Agreements whereby it agreed to fully and unconditionally guarantee the payments of principal, premium (if any), and interest on approximately
$5.2 billion
aggregate principal amount of senior notes on a senior basis and
$350.0 million
aggregate principal amount of a junior subordinated debenture (collectively, the “notes”) on a junior subordinated basis issued by SFC. The notes consist of the following:
8.250%
Senior Notes due 2023;
7.750%
Senior Notes due 2021;
6.00%
Senior Notes due 2020; a
60
-year junior subordinated debenture; and all senior notes outstanding on December 30, 2013, issued pursuant to the Indenture dated as of May 1, 1999 (the “1999 Indenture”), between SFC and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the successor trustee to Citibank N.A.). As of December 30, 2013, approximately
$3.9 billion
aggregate principal amount of senior notes were outstanding under the 1999 Indenture. The
60
-year junior subordinated debenture underlies the trust preferred securities sold by a trust sponsored by SFC. On December 30, 2013, SHI entered into a Trust Guaranty Agreement whereby it agreed to fully and unconditionally guarantee the related payment obligations under the trust preferred securities. As of
September 30, 2014
, approximately
$5.1 billion
aggregate principal amount of senior notes, including
$3.9 billion
aggregate principal amount of senior notes under the 1999 Indenture, and
$350.0 million
aggregate principal amount of a junior subordinated debenture were outstanding.
REPURCHASE OR REPAYMENT OF DEBT
In connection with our liability management efforts, we or our affiliates from time to time have purchased, or may in the future purchase, portions of our outstanding indebtedness. Any such purchases may be made through open market or privately negotiated transactions with third parties or pursuant to one or more tender or exchange offers or otherwise, upon such terms and at such prices, as well as with such consideration as we or any such affiliates may determine. Our plans are dynamic and we may adjust our plans in response to changes in our expectations and changes in market conditions.
On March 31, 2014, Springleaf Financial Funding Company (“SFFC”) prepaid, without penalty or premium, the entire
$750.0 million
outstanding principal balance of the secured term loan, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Effective upon the prepayment, all obligations of SFFC, SFC, and most of the consumer finance operating subsidiaries of SFC under the secured term loan (other than contingent reimbursement obligations and indemnity obligations) were terminated and all guarantees and security interests were released.
8. Variable Interest Entities
As part of our overall funding strategy and as part of our efforts to support our liquidity from sources other than our traditional capital market sources, we have transferred certain finance receivables to VIEs for securitization transactions. Since these transactions involve securitization trusts required to be consolidated, the securitized assets and related liabilities are included in our condensed consolidated financial statements and are accounted for as secured borrowings. As a result of the sales of the Company’s beneficial interests in the mortgage-backed retained certificates related to its previous mortgage securitization transactions, we deconsolidated the underlying real estate loans and previously issued securitized interests which were reported in long-term debt.
CONSOLIDATED VIES
We evaluated the securitization trusts and determined that these entities are VIEs of which we are the primary beneficiary; therefore, we consolidate such entities. We are deemed to be the primary beneficiaries of these VIEs because we have the ability to direct the activities of each VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses and the right to receive benefits that are potentially significant to the VIE. Such ability stems from SHI’s and/or its affiliates’ contractual right to service the securitized finance receivables. Our retained subordinated notes and residual interest trust certificates expose us to potentially significant losses and potentially significant returns.
The remaining asset-backed securities issued by the securitization trusts are supported by the expected cash flows from the underlying securitized finance receivables. Cash inflows from these finance receivables are distributed to investors and service
30
Table of Contents
providers in accordance with each transaction’s contractual priority of payments (“waterfall”) and, as such, most of these inflows must be directed first to service and repay each trust’s senior notes or certificates held principally by third-party investors. After these senior obligations are extinguished, substantially all cash inflows will be directed to the subordinated notes until fully repaid and, thereafter, to the residual interest that we own in each trust. We retain interests in these securitization transactions, including senior and subordinated securities issued by the VIEs and residual interests. We retain credit risk in the securitizations because our retained interests include the most subordinated interest in the securitized assets, which are the first to absorb credit losses on the securitized assets. We expect that any credit losses in the pools of securitized assets will likely be limited to our subordinated and residual retained interests. We have no obligation to repurchase or replace qualified securitized assets that subsequently become delinquent or are otherwise in default.
The carrying amounts of consolidated VIE assets and liabilities associated with our securitization trusts were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
Assets
Finance receivables:
Personal loans
$
1,841,139
$
1,572,070
SpringCastle Portfolio
$
2,083,145
$
2,505,349
Real estate loans
$
—
$
5,694,176
Allowance for finance receivable losses
$
67,800
$
153,657
Restricted cash
$
295,693
$
522,752
Liabilities
Long-term debt
$
3,052,972
$
7,288,535
2014 Consumer Loan Securitizations
Whitford Brook 2014-VFN1 Securitization.
On June 26, 2014, we established a private securitization facility in which Whitford Brook Funding Trust 2014-VFN1 (the “Whitford Brook 2014-VFN1 Trust”), a wholly owned special purpose vehicle of SFC, may issue variable funding notes with a maximum principal balance of
$300 million
to be backed by personal loans acquired from subsidiaries of SFC. The notes will be funded over a
three
-year period, subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions precedent. During this period, the notes can also be paid down to the required minimum balance of
$100 million
and then redrawn. Following the
three
-year funding period, the principal amount of the notes will be reduced as cash payments are received on the underlying personal loans and will be due and payable in full in July 2018, unless an option to prepay is elected between July 2017 and July 2018. At
September 30, 2014
, the required minimum balance of
$100 million
was drawn under the notes.
2014-A Securitization.
On March 26, 2014, we completed a private securitization transaction in which a wholly owned special purpose vehicle of SFC sold
$559.3 million
of notes backed by personal loans held by Springleaf Funding Trust 2014-A (the “2014-A Trust”), at a
2.62%
weighted average yield. We sold the asset-backed notes for
$559.2 million
, after the price discount but before expenses and a
$6.4 million
interest reserve requirement. We initially retained
$32.9 million
of the 2014-A Trust’s subordinate asset-backed notes.
Sales of Previously Retained Notes
As discussed in Note 1, the Company’s remaining beneficial interests in the mortgage-backed retained certificates related to its previous mortgage securitization transactions were sold in four separate transactions on March 31, June 30, August 29, and September 30, 2014. As a result of these sales, we deconsolidated the securitization trusts holding the underlying real estate loans and previously issued securitized interests which were reported in long-term debt, as we no longer were considered the primary beneficiary.
31
Table of Contents
During the nine months ended September 30,
2013
, we sold the following previously retained mortgage-backed and asset-backed notes:
(dollars in thousands)
Principal Amount of
Previously Retained Notes Issued
Carrying Amount of
Additional Debt Recorded
Mortgage Securitizations
SLFMT 2012-2
$
20,000
$
20,675
SLFMT 2012-3
$
7,500
$
7,753
SLFMT 2013-2
$
157,517
$
148,559
Consumer Securitizations
SLFMT 2013-B
$
114,000
$
111,578
SpringCastle Securitizations
SCFT 2013-1
$
372,000
$
357,120
Renewal of Midbrook 2013-VFN1 Securitization
On September 26, 2013, we established a private securitization facility in which Midbrook Funding Trust 2013-VFN1 (the “Midbrook 2013-VFN1 Trust”), a wholly owned special purpose vehicle of SFC, could issue variable funding notes with a maximum principal balance of
$300 million
to be backed by personal loans acquired from subsidiaries of SFC from time to time.
No
amounts were funded at closing, but could be funded from time to time over a
one
-year period, subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions precedent. During this period, the notes could also be paid down in whole or in part and then redrawn. Following the
one
-year funding period, the principal amount of the notes, if any, would amortize and would be due and payable in full in October 2017.
On June 13, 2014, we amended the note purchase agreement with Midbrook 2013-VFN1 Trust to extend the one-year funding period to a
two
-year funding period. Following the
two
-year funding period, the principal amount of the notes, if any, will be reduced as cash payments are received on the underlying personal loans and will be due and payable in full in July 2019. The maximum principal balance of variable funding notes that can be issued remained at
$300 million
.
No
amounts have been funded.
Repayment of 2013-BAC Trust Notes
On September 25, 2013, we completed a private securitization transaction in which Springleaf Funding Trust 2013-BAC, a wholly owned special purpose vehicle of SFC, issued
$500 million
of notes backed by an amortizing pool of personal loans acquired from subsidiaries of SFC. On March 27, 2014, we repaid the entire
$231.3 million
outstanding principal balance of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
VIE Interest Expense
Other than our retained subordinate and residual interests in the remaining consolidated securitization trusts, we are under no obligation, either contractually or implicitly, to provide financial support to these entities. Consolidated interest expense related to our VIEs for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
totaled
$50.8 million
and
$180.3 million
, respectively, compared to
$64.0 million
and
$153.4 million
for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
, respectively.
DECONSOLIDATED VIES
As a result of the sales of the mortgage-backed retained certificates during the first nine months of 2014, we deconsolidated the securitization trusts holding the underlying real estate loans and previously issued securitized interests which were reported in long-term debt. The total carrying value of these real estate loans as of the sale dates was
$5.2 billion
. We have certain representations and warranties associated with these sales that may expose us to future losses. During the third quarter of
2014
, we established a reserve for sales recourse obligations of
$6.7 million
related to these sales. As of
September 30, 2014
, we had no repurchase activity associated with these sales. However, we will continue to monitor any repurchase activity in the future and will adjust the reserve accordingly.
32
Table of Contents
9. Derivative Financial Instruments
Our principal borrowing subsidiary is SFC. During the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, SFC did not have any derivative activity.
In January 2013, we reclassified
$0.2 million
of deferred net gain from accumulated other comprehensive income or loss to interest expense related to SFC’s election to discontinue and terminate one of its cash flow hedges in 2012. On August 5, 2013, SFC terminated its remaining cross currency interest rate swap agreement with AIG Financial Products Corp., a subsidiary of AIG, and recorded a loss of
$1.9 million
in other revenues — other. Immediately following this termination, we had
no
derivative financial instruments.
For the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
, we recognized
$1.0 million
of net gains and
$3.4 million
of net losses, respectively, on SFC’s non-designated hedging instruments in other revenues — other.
Derivative adjustments included in other revenues — other consisted of the following:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Mark to market gains (losses)
$
6,260
$
(8,244
)
Net interest income
1,701
9,161
Credit valuation adjustment gains
11
50
Other
(292
)
(292
)
Total
$
7,680
$
675
SFC was exposed to credit risk if counterparties to its swap agreement did not perform. SFC regularly monitored counterparty credit ratings throughout the term of the agreement. SFC’s exposure to market risk was limited to changes in the value of its swap agreement offset by changes in the value of the hedged debt. While SFC’s cross currency interest rate swap agreement mitigated economic exposure of related debt, it did not qualify as a cash flow or fair value hedge under U.S. GAAP.
10. Earnings Per Share
The computation of earnings per share was as follows:
(dollars in thousands except earnings (loss) per share)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Revised
Revised
Numerator (basic and diluted):
Net income (loss) attributable to Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
$
426,750
$
(92,594
)
$
551,463
$
(46,030
)
Denominator:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (basic)
$
114,788,439
$
100,000,000
$
114,788,439
$
100,000,000
Effect of dilutive securities
527,875
—
423,959
—
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (diluted)
$
115,316,314
$
100,000,000
$
115,212,398
$
100,000,000
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic
$
3.72
$
(0.93
)
$
4.80
$
(0.46
)
Diluted
$
3.70
$
(0.93
)
$
4.79
$
(0.46
)
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Dilutive potential common shares represent outstanding unvested restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and awards.
33
Table of Contents
11. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
Investment
Securities
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
Cash Flow
Hedges
Retirement
Plan
Liabilities
Adjustments
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Balance at beginning of period
$
14,580
$
—
$
20,153
$
3,086
$
37,819
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(2,503
)
—
—
761
(1,742
)
Reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income
(1,788
)
—
—
—
(1,788
)
Balance at end of period
$
10,289
$
—
$
20,153
$
3,847
$
34,289
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013 - Revised
Balance at beginning of period
$
5,484
$
—
$
8,120
$
6,221
$
19,825
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications
(291
)
—
—
(2,056
)
(2,347
)
Reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income
231
—
—
—
231
Balance at end of period
$
5,424
$
—
$
8,120
$
4,165
$
17,709
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Balance at beginning of period
$
4,362
$
—
$
20,153
$
3,580
$
28,095
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
9,840
—
—
267
10,107
Reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income
(3,913
)
—
—
—
(3,913
)
Balance at end of period
$
10,289
$
—
$
20,153
$
3,847
$
34,289
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013 - Revised
Balance at beginning of period
$
14,121
$
104
$
8,120
$
4,127
$
26,472
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
(7,233
)
—
—
38
(7,195
)
Reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income
(1,464
)
(104
)
—
—
(1,568
)
Balance at end of period
$
5,424
$
—
$
8,120
$
4,165
$
17,709
34
Table of Contents
Reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income to the applicable line item on our condensed consolidated statements of operations were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Revised
Revised
Unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities:
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to investment revenues, before taxes
$
2,750
$
(355
)
$
6,019
$
2,253
Income tax effect
(962
)
124
(2,106
)
(789
)
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to investment revenues, net of taxes
1,788
(231
)
3,913
1,464
Unrealized gains on cash flow hedges:
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense, before taxes
—
—
—
160
Income tax effect
—
—
—
(56
)
Reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest expense, net of taxes
—
—
—
104
Total
$
1,788
$
(231
)
$
3,913
$
1,568
12. Income Taxes
At
September 30, 2014
, we had a net deferred tax liability of
$146.4 million
, compared to
$128.3 million
at
December 31, 2013
. The increase in the net deferred tax liability was primarily due to the sales of the mortgage securitizations during the first nine months of 2014. We have a valuation allowance on our gross state deferred tax assets, net of a deferred federal tax benefit of
$24.9 million
, at
September 30, 2014
compared to
$23.8 million
at
December 31, 2013
. We also had a valuation allowance against our United Kingdom and Puerto Rico operations of
$22.2 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$21.4 million
at
December 31, 2013
. The impact to our uncertain tax positions was immaterial.
The effective tax rate for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
was
32.8%
compared to
(5.2)%
for the same period in
2013
. The effective tax rate for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the effect of the non-controlling interest in our joint venture, which decreased the effective tax rate by
3.6%
, partially offset by the effect of our state income taxes, which increased the effective tax rate by
1.4%
. The effective tax rate for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
differed from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the effect of the non-controlling interest in our joint venture.
13. Contingencies
LEGAL CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of business, the Company has been named, from time to time, as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation arising in connection with its activities. Some of the actual or threatened legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. While we will continue to identify certain legal actions where we believe a material loss to be reasonably possible and reasonably estimable, there can be no assurance that material losses will not be incurred from claims that we have not yet been notified of or are not yet determined to be probable or reasonably possible and reasonably estimable.
We contest liability and/or the amount of damages, as appropriate, in each pending matter. Where available information indicates that it is probable that a liability had been incurred at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and we can reasonably estimate the amount of that loss, we accrue the estimated loss by a charge to income. In many actions, however, it is inherently difficult to determine whether any loss is probable or even reasonably possible or to estimate the amount of any loss. In addition, even where loss is reasonably possible or an exposure to loss exists in excess of the liability already accrued with respect to a previously recognized loss contingency, it is not always possible to reasonably estimate the size of the possible loss or range of loss.
35
Table of Contents
For certain legal actions, we cannot reasonably estimate such losses, particularly for actions that are in their early stages of development or where plaintiffs seek substantial or indeterminate damages. Numerous issues may need to be resolved, including through potentially lengthy discovery and determination of important factual matters, and by addressing novel or unsettled legal questions relevant to the actions in question, before a loss or additional loss or range of loss or additional loss can be reasonably estimated for any given action.
For certain other legal actions, we can estimate reasonably possible losses, additional losses, ranges of loss or ranges of additional loss in excess of amounts accrued, but do not believe, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that such losses will have a material adverse effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements as a whole.
PAYMENT PROTECTION INSURANCE
Our United Kingdom subsidiary provides payments of compensation to its customers who have made claims concerning Payment Protection Insurance (“PPI”) policies sold in the normal course of business by insurance intermediaries. On April 20, 2011, the High Court in the United Kingdom handed down judgment supporting the Financial Services Authority (now known as the Financial Conduct Authority) (“FCA”) guidelines on the treatment of PPI complaints. In addition, the FCA issued a guidance consultation paper in March 2012 on the PPI customer contact letters. As a result, we have concluded that there are certain circumstances where customer contact and/or redress is appropriate; therefore, this activity is ongoing. The total reserves related to the estimated PPI claims were
$22.1 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$33.5 million
at
December 31, 2013
.
14. Benefit Plans
PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT PLANS
Effective December 31, 2012, the Springleaf Financial Services Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) and the CommoLoCo Retirement Plan (a defined benefit pension plan for our employees in Puerto Rico) were frozen. Our current and former employees will not lose any vested benefits in the Retirement Plan or the CommoLoCo Retirement Plan that accrued prior to January 1, 2013.
The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost with respect to our defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Pension
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Interest cost
$
3,805
$
3,589
$
11,441
$
10,769
Expected return on assets
(4,107
)
(3,874
)
(12,326
)
(11,622
)
Amortization of net loss
2
12
4
35
Net periodic benefit cost
$
(300
)
$
(273
)
$
(881
)
$
(818
)
Postretirement
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost
$
20
$
81
$
64
$
242
Interest cost
21
64
73
193
Amortization of net gain
(81
)
—
(215
)
—
Net periodic benefit cost
$
(40
)
$
145
$
(78
)
$
435
36
Table of Contents
15. Share-Based Compensation
Total share-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures, for all stock-based awards during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
was
$0.5 million
and
$4.1 million
, respectively, compared to
$131.3 million
during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
.
16. Segment Information
Our segments coincide with how our businesses are managed. At
September 30, 2014
, our
four
segments include: Consumer, Insurance, Acquisitions and Servicing, and Real Estate. The Acquisitions and Servicing segment was added effective April 1, 2013, as a result of our co-investment in the SpringCastle Portfolio.
Management considers Consumer, Insurance, and Acquisitions and Servicing as our “Core Consumer Operations” and Real Estate as our “Non-Core Portfolio.”
Our segments are managed as follows:
Core Consumer Operations
•
Consumer
— We originate and service personal loans (secured and unsecured) through
two
business divisions: branch operations and centralized internet lending. Branch operations primarily conduct business in
26
states, which are our core operating states. Our Centralized Internet Group (“CIG”) processes and underwrites loan applications that we receive through an internet portal. If the applicant is located near an existing branch (“in footprint”), CIG makes the credit decision regarding the application and then refers the customer to a nearby branch for closing, funding and servicing. If the applicant is not located near a branch (“out of footprint”), CIG originates the loan.
•
Insurance
— We offer credit insurance (life insurance, accident and health insurance, and involuntary unemployment insurance), non-credit insurance, and ancillary products, such as warranty protection.
•
Acquisitions and Servicing
— On April 1, 2013, we acquired the SpringCastle Portfolio through a joint venture in which we own a
47%
equity interest. The SpringCastle Portfolio consists of unsecured loans and loans secured by subordinate residential real estate mortgages (which we service as unsecured loans due to the fact that the liens are subordinated to superior ranking security interests). These loans vary in form and substance from our typical branch serviced loans and are in a liquidating status with no anticipation of significant renewal activity. Future strategic portfolio or business acquisitions will also be a part of this segment.
Non-Core Portfolio
•
Real Estate
— We service and hold real estate loans secured by first or second mortgages on residential real estate. Real estate loans previously originated through our branch offices or previously acquired or originated through centralized distribution channels are either serviced by: (i) MorEquity, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary, all of which are subserviced by Nationstar or (ii) our centralized servicing operation. Investment funds managed by affiliates of Fortress indirectly own a majority interest in Nationstar.
The remaining components (which we refer to as “Other”) consist of our other non-core, non-originating legacy operations, which are isolated by geographic market and/or distribution channel from our Core Consumer Operations and our Non-Core Portfolio. These operations include our legacy operations in
14
states where we have also ceased branch-based personal lending, our liquidating retail sales finance portfolio (including our retail sales finance accounts from our dedicated auto finance operation), our lending operations in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the operations of our United Kingdom subsidiary. Effective June 1, 2014, we also report (on a prospective basis) certain real estate loans with equity capacity in Other. These short equity loans, which have liquidated down to an immaterial level, were previously included in our Core Consumer Operations. At June 1, 2014, the transfer date, the carrying value of these loans totaled
$16.3 million
.
37
Table of Contents
Due to the nature of the Fortress Acquisition, we applied push-down accounting. However, we report the operating results of our Core Consumer Operations, Non-Core Portfolio, and Other using the same accounting basis that we employed prior to the Fortress Acquisition, which we refer to as “historical accounting basis,” to provide a consistent basis for both management and other interested third parties to better understand the operating results of these segments. The historical accounting basis (which is a basis of accounting other than U.S. GAAP) also provides better comparability of the operating results of these segments to our competitors and other companies in the financial services industry. The historical accounting basis is not applicable to the Acquisitions and Servicing segment since this segment resulted from the purchase of the SpringCastle Portfolio on April 1, 2013 and therefore, was not affected by the Fortress Acquisition.
The “Push-down Accounting Adjustments” column in the following tables primarily consists of:
•
the accretion or amortization of the valuation adjustments on the applicable revalued assets and liabilities;
•
the difference in finance charges on our purchased credit impaired finance receivables compared to the finance charges on these finance receivables on a historical accounting basis;
•
the elimination of accretion or amortization of historical based discounts, premiums, and other deferred costs on our finance receivables and long-term debt;
•
the difference in provision for finance receivable losses required based upon the differences in historical accounting basis and push-down accounting basis of the finance receivables;
•
the acceleration of the accretion of the net discount or amortization of the net premium applied to long-term debt that we repurchase or repay;
•
the reversal of the remaining unaccreted push-down accounting basis for net finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses established at the date of the Fortress Acquisition on finance receivables held for sale that we sold; and
•
the difference in the fair value of long-term debt based upon the differences between historical accounting basis where certain long-term debt components are marked-to-market on a recurring basis, and push-down accounting basis where long-term debt is no longer marked-to-market on a recurring basis.
38
Table of Contents
The following tables present information about the Company’s segments as well as reconciliations to the condensed consolidated financial statement amounts.
(dollars in thousands)
Consumer
Insurance
Acquisitions and Servicing
Real Estate
Other
Eliminations
Push-down
Accounting
Adjustments
Consolidated
Total
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Interest income:
Finance charges
$
236,190
$
—
$
130,981
$
53,568
$
3,850
$
—
$
10,856
$
435,445
Finance receivables held for sale originated as held for investment
—
—
—
41,468
—
—
6,211
47,679
Total interest income
236,190
—
130,981
95,036
3,850
—
17,067
483,124
Interest expense
40,466
—
17,685
83,795
1,837
—
36,359
180,142
Net interest income
195,724
—
113,296
11,241
2,013
—
(19,292
)
302,982
Provision for finance receivable losses
56,087
—
28,332
37,192
1,290
—
(19,930
)
102,971
Net interest income (loss) after provision for finance receivable losses
139,637
—
84,964
(25,951
)
723
—
638
200,011
Other revenues:
Insurance
—
43,997
—
—
14
—
(1
)
44,010
Investment
—
13,723
—
(954
)
45
—
(1,563
)
11,251
Intersegment - insurance commissions
19,540
(19,759
)
—
220
(1
)
—
—
—
Portfolio servicing fees from SpringCastle
—
—
16,006
—
—
(16,006
)
—
—
Net gain (loss) on fair value adjustments on debt
—
—
1,522
—
—
—
(170
)
1,352
Net gain on sales of real estate loans and related trust assets *
—
—
—
279,889
—
—
361,439
641,328
Other
618
2,428
264
(2,593
)
8
—
(12,700
)
(11,975
)
Total other revenues
20,158
40,389
17,792
276,562
66
(16,006
)
347,005
685,966
Other expenses:
Operating expenses:
Salaries and benefits
64,015
4,791
6,837
17,186
1,915
—
(42
)
94,702
Other operating expenses
44,554
3,758
5,493
18,984
1,365
—
963
75,117
Portfolio servicing fees to Springleaf
—
—
16,006
—
—
(16,006
)
—
—
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
—
20,451
—
—
—
—
(310
)
20,141
Total other expenses
108,569
29,000
28,336
36,170
3,280
(16,006
)
611
189,960
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
51,226
11,389
74,420
214,441
(2,491
)
—
347,032
696,017
Income before provision for income taxes attributable to non-controlling interests
—
—
34,945
—
—
—
—
34,945
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes attributable to Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
$
51,226
$
11,389
$
39,475
$
214,441
$
(2,491
)
$
—
$
347,032
$
661,072
*
For purposes of our segment reporting presentation, we have combined the lower of cost or fair value adjustments recorded on the date the real estate loans were transferred to finance receivables held for sale with the final gain (loss) on the sale of these loans.
39
Table of Contents
(dollars in thousands)
Consumer
Insurance
Acquisitions
and
Servicing
Real Estate
Other
Eliminations
Push-down
Accounting
Adjustments
Consolidated
Total
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013 - Revised
Interest income
$
188,601
$
—
$
162,918
$
170,772
$
10,000
$
—
$
51,635
$
583,926
Interest expense
38,241
—
22,418
131,699
3,323
—
33,476
229,157
Net interest income
150,360
—
140,500
39,073
6,677
—
18,159
354,769
Provision for finance receivable losses
38,174
—
60,662
52,645
2,361
—
8,422
162,264
Net interest income (loss) after provision for finance receivable losses
112,186
—
79,838
(13,572
)
4,316
—
9,737
192,505
Other revenues:
Insurance
—
38,266
—
—
18
—
(7
)
38,277
Investment
—
8,314
—
—
(1
)
—
(1,781
)
6,532
Intersegment - insurance commissions
15,131
(15,142
)
—
36
(25
)
—
—
—
Portfolio servicing fees from SpringCastle
—
—
9,565
—
—
(9,565
)
—
—
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt
(2,890
)
—
—
(15,818
)
(706
)
—
(14,158
)
(33,572
)
Net gain (loss) on fair value adjustments on debt
—
—
6,619
12,217
—
—
(12,250
)
6,586
Other
910
2,426
279
(2,047
)
—
—
35
1,603
Total other revenues
13,151
33,864
16,463
(5,612
)
(714
)
(9,565
)
(28,161
)
19,426
Other expenses:
Operating expenses:
Salaries and benefits
62,318
4,481
4,006
7,551
136,249
—
(53
)
214,552
Other operating expenses
30,421
3,115
21,488
14,313
2,038
—
1,103
72,478
Portfolio servicing fees to Springleaf
—
—
9,565
—
—
(9,565
)
—
—
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
—
16,849
—
—
—
—
(299
)
16,550
Total other expenses
92,739
24,445
35,059
21,864
138,287
(9,565
)
751
303,580
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
32,598
9,419
61,242
(41,048
)
(134,685
)
—
(19,175
)
(91,649
)
Income before provision for income taxes attributable to non-controlling interests
—
—
31,643
—
—
—
—
31,643
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes attributable to Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
$
32,598
$
9,419
$
29,599
$
(41,048
)
$
(134,685
)
$
—
$
(19,175
)
$
(123,292
)
40
Table of Contents
(dollars in thousands)
Consumer
Insurance
Acquisitions
and
Servicing
Real Estate
Other
Eliminations
Push-down
Accounting
Adjustments
Consolidated
Total
At or for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Interest income:
Finance charges
$
666,281
$
—
$
413,952
$
338,121
$
13,265
$
—
$
81,971
$
1,513,590
Finance receivables held for sale originated as held for investment
—
—
—
48,598
—
—
6,323
54,921
Total interest income
666,281
—
413,952
386,719
13,265
—
88,294
1,568,511
Interest expense
122,097
—
57,986
291,084
5,810
—
99,886
576,863
Net interest income
544,184
—
355,966
95,635
7,455
—
(11,592
)
991,648
Provision for finance receivable losses
149,238
—
121,681
118,992
6,557
—
(17,272
)
379,196
Net interest income (loss) after provision for finance receivable losses
394,946
—
234,285
(23,357
)
898
—
5,680
612,452
Other revenues:
Insurance
—
125,075
—
—
46
—
(5
)
125,116
Investment
—
35,652
—
(954
)
69
—
(3,433
)
31,334
Intersegment - insurance commissions
51,504
(51,936
)
—
442
(10
)
—
—
—
Portfolio servicing fees from SpringCastle
—
—
51,274
—
—
(51,274
)
—
—
Net gain (loss) on repurchases and repayments of debt
(1,429
)
—
—
(10,023
)
(47
)
—
4,884
(6,615
)
Net gain (loss) on fair value adjustments on debt
—
—
(14,810
)
8,298
—
—
(8,521
)
(15,033
)
Net gain on sales of real estate loans and related trust assets *
—
—
—
194,894
—
—
536,420
731,314
Other
1,742
6,103
856
(4,022
)
618
—
(12,700
)
(7,403
)
Total other revenues
51,817
114,894
37,320
188,635
676
(51,274
)
516,645
858,713
Other expenses:
Operating expenses:
Salaries and benefits
195,778
14,501
24,612
34,559
9,183
—
(129
)
278,504
Other operating expenses
112,668
10,745
17,763
43,616
5,190
—
2,907
192,889
Portfolio servicing fees to Springleaf
—
—
51,274
—
—
(51,274
)
—
—
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
—
57,923
—
—
—
—
(750
)
57,173
Total other expenses
308,446
83,169
93,649
78,175
14,373
(51,274
)
2,028
528,566
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
138,317
31,725
177,956
87,103
(12,799
)
—
520,297
942,599
Income before provision for income taxes attributable to non-controlling interests
—
—
81,542
—
—
—
—
81,542
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes attributable to Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
$
138,317
$
31,725
$
96,414
$
87,103
$
(12,799
)
$
—
$
520,297
$
861,057
Assets
$
3,651,365
$
1,060,074
$
2,261,704
$
3,656,616
$
624,921
$
—
$
8,138
$
11,262,818
*
For purposes of our segment reporting presentation, we have combined the lower of cost or fair value adjustments recorded on the dates the real estate loans were transferred to finance receivables held for sale with the final gain (loss) on the sales of these loans.
41
Table of Contents
(dollars in thousands)
Consumer
Insurance
Acquisitions
and
Servicing
Real Estate
Other
Eliminations
Push-down
Accounting
Adjustments
Consolidated
Total
At or for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013 - Revised
Interest income
$
519,688
$
—
$
331,288
$
535,280
$
37,631
$
—
$
153,674
$
1,577,561
Interest expense
111,110
—
47,009
427,608
12,164
—
102,977
700,868
Net interest income
408,578
—
284,279
107,672
25,467
—
50,697
876,693
Provision for finance receivable losses
52,188
—
78,459
188,737
(3,385
)
—
23,062
339,061
Net interest income (loss) after provision for finance receivable losses
356,390
—
205,820
(81,065
)
28,852
—
27,635
537,632
Other revenues:
Insurance
—
107,114
—
—
58
—
(28
)
107,144
Investment
—
31,792
—
—
1,396
—
(5,934
)
27,254
Intersegment - insurance commissions
43,341
(43,347
)
—
94
(88
)
—
—
—
Portfolio servicing fees from SpringCastle
—
—
11,945
—
—
(11,945
)
—
—
Net gain (loss) on repurchases and repayments of debt
(4,390
)
—
—
(35,418
)
(977
)
—
6,976
(33,809
)
Net gain (loss) on fair value adjustments on debt
—
—
6,619
45,428
—
—
(44,950
)
7,097
Other
1,698
6,797
360
(1,645
)
(90
)
—
(134
)
6,986
Total other revenues
40,649
102,356
18,924
8,459
299
(11,945
)
(44,070
)
114,672
Other expenses:
Operating expenses:
Salaries and benefits
184,077
11,424
6,417
20,648
149,436
—
(160
)
371,842
Other operating expenses
87,609
7,993
43,624
42,281
9,532
—
3,418
194,457
Portfolio servicing fees to Springleaf
—
—
11,945
—
—
(11,945
)
—
—
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
—
48,373
—
—
—
—
(723
)
47,650
Total other expenses
271,686
67,790
61,986
62,929
158,968
(11,945
)
2,535
613,949
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
125,353
34,566
162,758
(135,535
)
(129,817
)
—
(18,970
)
38,355
Income before provision for income taxes attributable to non-controlling interests
—
—
86,383
—
—
—
—
86,383
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes attributable to Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
$
125,353
$
34,566
$
76,375
$
(135,535
)
$
(129,817
)
$
—
$
(18,970
)
$
(48,028
)
Assets
$
3,035,759
$
913,440
$
2,855,486
$
8,901,567
$
1,486,783
$
—
$
(675,537
)
$
16,517,498
17. Prior Period Revisions
As disclosed in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K, we identified certain out-of-period errors in preparing our annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2013
. In addition to these errors, we had previously recorded and disclosed out-of-period adjustments in prior reporting periods when the errors were discovered. As a result, we revised all previously reported periods included in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Similarly, we have revised all previously reported periods included in this report. We corrected the errors identified in the fourth quarter of
2013
and included these corrections in the appropriate prior periods. In addition, we reversed all out-of period adjustments previously recorded and disclosed, and included the adjustments in the appropriate periods. After evaluating the quantitative and qualitative aspects
42
Table of Contents
of these corrections, we have determined that our previous quarterly condensed financial statements and our annual consolidated financial statements were not materially misstated.
The errors identified in the fourth quarter of
2013
related to the following: (1) the accretion of net discount applied to long-term debt that was revalued based on its fair value at the time of the Fortress Acquisition; (2) the accretion of original issue net discount on our long-term debt issued subsequent to the Fortress Acquisition; (3) the carrying values of our tranches of long-term debt that were issued at a discount and which have embedded derivatives, and the related change in fair value; (4) the classification of certain investment securities found to contain embedded derivatives and the accounting treatment of the related change in fair value; and (5) the continued accretion of discounts on loans in non-accrual status.
In addition, we made other corrections during the fourth quarter of
2013
, which were isolated to intra-periods in
2013
, and revised the appropriate periods of
2013
in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K and in this report. These revisions related to the following: (1) servicing fee expenses for the SpringCastle Portfolio pursuant to an interim servicing agreement that was in place between April 1, 2013 and August 31, 2013; (2) accretion of the unearned discount for non-credit impaired loans in the SpringCastle Portfolio and the resulting adjustment to the allowance for finance receivable losses for the SpringCastle Portfolio; (3) finance charge calculation on our internal servicing system for the SpringCastle Portfolio; and (4) charge-offs on certain qualified real estate loans that had not been granted principal forgiveness.
We also recorded the previously disclosed out-of-period adjustments in the appropriate periods. These adjustments primarily related to the following:
•
capitalized interest on purchased credit impaired finance receivables serviced by a third party;
•
the difference between the hypothetical derivative interest expense and the contractual derivative interest expense;
•
the identification of certain bankrupt real estate loan accounts for consideration as TDR finance receivables;
•
to correct certain inputs in our model supporting the TDR allowance for finance receivable losses;
•
distributions of limited partnerships;
•
the calculations of the carrying value for our real estate owned and the net loss on sales of our real estate owned that are externally serviced;
•
the calculation of real estate owned expenses;
•
payable to former parent related to any refund of (or credit for) taxes, including any interest received;
•
benefit reserves related to a closed block of annuities;
•
change in estimate for the taxable income related to mortgage securitizations; and
•
the correction of current and deferred tax expense.
In addition to the revisions previously discussed, during the fourth quarter of
2013
we identified presentation errors in the classification of certain line items within our consolidated statement of cash flows and revised the appropriate line items in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K and in this report. These errors related to the following:
•
the income tax effect on the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income related to net unrealized gains and losses on investment securities and cash flow hedges were incorrectly included in “Change in other assets and other liabilities” instead of “Change in taxes receivable and payable” within the same operating activities section;
•
certain debt issue costs were incorrectly included in “Change in other assets and other liabilities” within the operating activities section instead of “Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of commissions” within the financing activities section;
•
advances on SpringCastle’s revolving loans were incorrectly included as a reduction to “Principal collections on finance receivables” instead of “Finance receivables originated or purchased, net of deferred origination costs” within the same investing activities section;
•
the deferred costs on the repurchased debt incurred after the Fortress Acquisition were incorrectly included in “Change in other assets and other liabilities” instead of “Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt” within the same operating activities section;
•
accrued interest and finance charges on real estate loan modifications were incorrectly included in “Principal collections on finance receivables” within the investing activities section instead of “Change in accrued interest and finance charges” within the operating activities section; and
•
“Deferral of finance receivable origination costs” was incorrectly included within the operating activities section instead of the investing activities section.
43
Table of Contents
Revised Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited)
The following table reconciles the amounts previously reported in our condensed consolidated statement of operations to the corresponding revised amounts. The “Out-of-Period” column reflects the previously disclosed out-of period adjustments that are now being corrected in the appropriate periods. The “Adjustments” column reflects the corrections of the errors discovered during the fourth quarter of
2013
.
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013 (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013 (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands except
earnings (loss) per share)
As Reported
Out-of-Period
Adjustments
As Revised
As Reported
Out-of-Period
Adjustments
As Revised
Interest income
$
585,300
$
—
$
(1,374
)
$
583,926
$
1,578,935
$
—
$
(1,374
)
$
1,577,561
Interest expense
228,439
—
718
229,157
697,365
—
3,503
700,868
Net interest income
356,861
—
(2,092
)
354,769
881,570
—
(4,877
)
876,693
Provision for finance receivable losses
158,785
4,424
(945
)
162,264
341,723
(853
)
(1,809
)
339,061
Net interest income after provision for finance receivable losses
198,076
(4,424
)
(1,147
)
192,505
539,847
853
(3,068
)
537,632
Other revenues:
Insurance
38,277
—
—
38,277
107,144
—
—
107,144
Investment
6,756
—
(224
)
6,532
27,687
—
(433
)
27,254
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt
(34,503
)
—
931
(33,572
)
(34,558
)
—
749
(33,809
)
Net gain on fair value adjustments on debt
—
—
6,586
6,586
—
—
7,097
7,097
Other
1,603
—
—
1,603
6,986
—
—
6,986
Total other revenues
12,133
—
7,293
19,426
107,259
—
7,413
114,672
Other expenses:
Operating expenses:
Salaries and benefits
214,552
—
—
214,552
371,842
—
—
371,842
Other operating expenses
69,595
—
2,883
72,478
191,574
—
2,883
194,457
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
16,550
—
—
16,550
47,650
—
—
47,650
Total other expenses
300,697
—
2,883
303,580
611,066
—
2,883
613,949
Income (loss) before benefit from income taxes
(90,488
)
(4,424
)
3,263
(91,649
)
36,040
853
1,462
38,355
Benefit from income taxes
(29,606
)
(1,636
)
544
(30,698
)
(1,898
)
315
(415
)
(1,998
)
Net income (loss)
(60,882
)
(2,788
)
2,719
(60,951
)
37,938
538
1,877
40,353
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
29,851
—
1,792
31,643
83,800
—
2,583
86,383
Net loss attributable to Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
$
(90,733
)
$
(2,788
)
$
927
$
(92,594
)
$
(45,862
)
$
538
$
(706
)
$
(46,030
)
Share Data:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted
100,000,000
100,000,000
100,000,000
100,000,000
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic and diluted
$
(0.91
)
$
(0.93
)
$
(0.46
)
$
(0.46
)
44
Table of Contents
Revised Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited)
The following table presents the amounts previously reported in our condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income and the corresponding revised amounts.
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013 (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013 (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
As Reported
As Revised
As Reported
As Revised
Net income (loss)
$
(60,882
)
$
(60,951
)
$
37,938
$
40,353
Other comprehensive loss:
Net unrealized losses on:
Investment securities on which other-than-temporary impairments were taken
(17
)
(17
)
(135
)
(135
)
All other investment securities
(331
)
(429
)
(10,989
)
(10,989
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
(2,056
)
(2,056
)
38
38
Income tax effect:
Net unrealized losses on:
Investment securities on which other-than-temporary impairments were taken
6
6
47
47
All other investment securities
116
149
3,846
3,844
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax, before reclassification adjustments
(2,282
)
(2,347
)
(7,193
)
(7,195
)
Reclassification adjustments included in net income (loss):
Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities
33
355
(2,686
)
(2,253
)
Cash flow hedges
—
—
(160
)
(160
)
Income tax effect:
Net realized gains (losses) on investment securities
(12
)
(124
)
940
789
Cash flow hedges
—
—
56
56
Reclassification adjustments included in net income (loss), net of tax
21
231
(1,850
)
(1,568
)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
(2,261
)
(2,116
)
(9,043
)
(8,763
)
Comprehensive income (loss)
(63,143
)
(63,067
)
28,895
31,590
Comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interests
29,851
31,643
83,799
86,383
Comprehensive loss attributable to Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
$
(92,994
)
$
(94,710
)
$
(54,904
)
$
(54,793
)
45
Table of Contents
Revised Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
The following table presents the amounts previously reported in our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows and the corresponding revised amounts and includes additional corrections to the classification of certain line items within our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013 (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
As Reported
As Revised
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income
$
37,938
$
40,353
Reconciling adjustments:
Provision for finance receivable losses
341,723
339,061
Depreciation and amortization
(40,181
)
(39,138
)
Deferral of finance receivable origination costs
(42,317
)
—
Deferred income tax benefit
(88,668
)
(88,476
)
Net gain on fair value adjustments of debt
—
(7,097
)
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt
17,075
33,809
Share-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures
131,250
131,250
Other
(1,140
)
(707
)
Cash flows due to changes in:
Other assets and other liabilities
50,431
91,943
Insurance claims and policyholder liabilities
14,917
14,917
Taxes receivable and payable
(29,177
)
(24,732
)
Accrued interest and finance charges
1,941
(30,566
)
Restricted cash not reinvested
33,885
33,885
Other, net
(824
)
(828
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
426,853
493,674
Cash flows from investing activities
Finance receivables originated or purchased, net of deferred origination costs
(1,596,394
)
(1,688,630
)
Principal collections on finance receivables
2,299,827
2,386,086
Purchase of SpringCastle Portfolio
(2,963,547
)
(2,963,547
)
Available-for-sale investment securities purchased
(448,981
)
(442,686
)
Trading investment securities purchased
—
(6,295
)
Available-for-sale investment securities called, sold, and matured
728,534
721,042
Trading investment securities called, sold, and matured
—
7,492
Change in restricted cash
(306,847
)
(395,552
)
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned
88,346
88,346
Other, net
(4,748
)
(4,749
)
Net cash used for investing activities
(2,203,810
)
(2,298,493
)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of commissions
6,008,369
5,990,565
Repayment of long-term debt
(4,768,854
)
(4,723,188
)
Contributions from joint venture partners
438,081
438,081
Distributions to joint venture partners
(204,516
)
(204,516
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
1,473,080
1,500,942
Effect of exchange rate changes
(835
)
(835
)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
(304,712
)
(304,712
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
1,554,348
1,554,348
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
1,249,636
$
1,249,636
46
Table of Contents
18. Fair Value Measurements
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that would be received if an asset were to be sold or the amount that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The degree of judgment used in measuring the fair value of financial instruments generally correlates with the level of pricing observability. Financial instruments with quoted prices in active markets generally have more pricing observability and less judgment is used in measuring fair value. Conversely, financial instruments traded in other-than-active markets or that do not have quoted prices have less observability and are measured at fair value using valuation models or other pricing techniques that require more judgment. An other-than-active market is one in which there are few transactions, the prices are not current, price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers, or little information is released publicly for the asset or liability being valued. Pricing observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of financial instrument, whether the financial instrument is listed on an exchange or traded over-the-counter or is new to the market and not yet established, the characteristics specific to the transaction, and general market conditions.
The following table summarizes the fair values and carrying values of our financial instruments and indicates the fair value hierarchy based on the level of inputs we utilized to determine such fair values:
Fair Value Measurements Using
Total
Fair
Value
Total
Carrying
Value
(dollars in thousands)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
September 30, 2014
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
1,970,512
$
—
$
—
$
1,970,512
$
1,970,512
Investment securities
—
1,709,631
13,750
1,723,381
1,723,381
Net finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses
—
—
6,757,907
6,757,907
6,238,917
Finance receivables held for sale
—
—
498,872
498,872
493,196
Restricted cash
312,825
—
—
312,825
312,825
Other assets:
Commercial mortgage loans
—
—
80,991
80,991
87,553
Escrow advance receivable
—
—
7,728
7,728
7,728
Liabilities
Long-term debt
$
—
$
8,812,305
$
—
$
8,812,305
$
7,858,037
December 31, 2013
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
431,409
$
—
$
—
$
431,409
$
431,409
Investment securities
—
558,473
23,617
582,090
582,090
Net finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses
—
—
13,774,701
13,774,701
13,424,988
Restricted cash
536,005
—
—
536,005
536,005
Other assets:
Commercial mortgage loans
—
—
94,681
94,681
102,200
Escrow advance receivable
—
—
23,527
23,527
23,527
Liabilities
Long-term debt
$
—
$
13,914,644
$
—
$
13,914,644
$
12,769,036
47
Table of Contents
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS — RECURRING BASIS
The following table presents information about our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and indicates the fair value hierarchy based on the levels of inputs we utilized to determine such fair value:
Fair Value Measurements Using
Total Carried At Fair Value
(dollars in thousands)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
September 30, 2014
Assets
Cash equivalents in mutual funds
$
622,012
$
—
$
—
$
622,012
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale securities:
Bonds:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
—
56,198
—
56,198
Obligations of states, municipalities, and political subdivisions
—
118,452
—
118,452
Corporate debt
—
264,313
4,125
268,438
RMBS
—
80,127
55
80,182
CMBS
—
23,150
15
23,165
CDO/ABS
—
21,565
—
21,565
Total
—
563,805
4,195
568,000
Preferred stock
—
7,043
—
7,043
Other long-term investments (a)
—
—
1,430
1,430
Total available-for-sale securities (b)
—
570,848
5,625
576,473
Trading securities:
Bonds:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
—
136,681
—
136,681
Obligations of states, municipalities, and political subdivisions
—
88,407
—
88,407
Corporate debt
—
449,104
—
449,104
RMBS
—
64,742
361
65,103
CMBS
—
107,937
—
107,937
CDO/ABS
—
291,912
6,430
298,342
Total trading securities
—
1,138,783
6,791
1,145,574
Total investment securities
—
1,709,631
12,416
1,722,047
Restricted cash in mutual funds
290,495
—
—
290,495
Total
$
912,507
$
1,709,631
$
12,416
$
2,634,554
Liabilities
Long-term debt
$
—
$
317,266
$
—
$
317,266
December 31, 2013
Assets
Cash equivalents in mutual funds
$
216,310
$
—
$
—
$
216,310
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale securities:
Bonds:
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
—
59,684
—
59,684
Obligations of states, municipalities, and political subdivisions
—
103,536
—
103,536
Corporate debt
—
239,141
12,604
251,745
RMBS
—
83,665
113
83,778
CMBS
—
10,974
2
10,976
CDO/ABS
—
9,397
800
10,197
Total
—
506,397
13,519
519,916
Preferred stock
—
7,805
—
7,805
Other long-term investments (a)
—
—
1,269
1,269
Total available-for-sale securities (b)
—
514,202
14,788
528,990
Trading securities:
Bonds:
Corporate debt
—
1,837
—
1,837
RMBS
—
10,671
—
10,671
CMBS
—
29,897
—
29,897
CDO/ABS
—
1,866
7,383
9,249
Total trading securities
—
44,271
7,383
51,654
Total investment securities
—
558,473
22,171
580,644
Restricted cash in mutual funds
493,297
—
—
493,297
Total
$
709,607
$
558,473
$
22,171
$
1,290,251
Liabilities
Long-term debt
$
—
$
363,677
$
—
$
363,677
48
Table of Contents
(a)
Other long-term investments excludes our interest in a limited partnership of
$0.5 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
$0.6 million
at
December 31, 2013
that we account for using the equity method.
(b)
Common stocks not carried at fair value totaled
$0.9 million
at
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
and therefore have been excluded from the table above.
We had
no
transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
.
The following table presents changes for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Net gains (losses) included in:
Purchases, sales, issues, settlements(a)
Transfers into
Level 3 (b)
Transfers
out of
Level 3 (c)
Balance
at end of
period
Balance at beginning
of period
Other revenues
Other comprehensive
income (loss)
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale securities:
Bonds:
Corporate debt
$
4,160
$
(27
)
$
(8
)
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
4,125
RMBS
65
(4
)
(6
)
—
—
—
55
CMBS
20
—
(5
)
—
—
—
15
Total
4,245
(31
)
(19
)
—
—
—
4,195
Other long-term investments
1,254
—
176
—
—
—
1,430
Total available-for-sale securities
5,499
(31
)
157
—
—
—
5,625
Trading securities:
Bonds:
RMBS
—
—
—
—
361
—
361
CDO/ABS
6,612
(24
)
—
(23
)
—
(135
)
6,430
Total trading securities
6,612
(24
)
—
(23
)
361
(135
)
6,791
Total
$
12,111
$
(55
)
$
157
$
(23
)
$
361
$
(135
)
$
12,416
(a)
“Purchases, sales, issues, and settlements” column consists only of settlements. There were
no
purchases, sales, or issues of investment securities for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
.
(b)
During the three months ended
September 30, 2014
, we transferred
$0.4 million
of RMBS securities into Level 3 primarily related to the re-evaluated observability of pricing inputs.
(c)
During the three months ended
September 30, 2014
, we transferred CDO/ABS securities totaling
$0.1 million
out of Level 3 primarily related to the re-evaluated observability of pricing inputs.
49
Table of Contents
The following table presents changes for the three months ended
September 30, 2013
in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Net gains (losses) included in:
Purchases,
sales,
issues,
settlements*
Transfers into
Level 3
Transfers
out of
Level 3
Balance
at end of
period
Balance at
beginning
of period
(dollars in thousands)
Other
revenues
Other
comprehensive
income (loss)
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013 - Revised
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale securities:
Bonds:
Corporate debt
$
13,114
$
(58
)
$
18
$
2,016
$
—
$
—
$
15,090
RMBS
218
—
(133
)
—
—
—
85
CMBS
2
—
—
—
—
—
2
CDO/ABS
800
—
—
—
—
—
800
Total
14,134
(58
)
(115
)
2,016
—
—
15,977
Other long-term investments
1,478
—
(103
)
—
1,375
Total available-for-sale securities
15,612
(58
)
(218
)
2,016
—
—
17,352
Trading securities:
Bonds:
CDO/ABS
7,663
49
(4
)
(75
)
—
—
7,633
Total
$
23,275
$
(9
)
$
(222
)
$
1,941
$
—
$
—
$
24,985
*
The detail of purchases, sales, issues, and settlements for the three months ended
September 30, 2013
is presented in the table below.
The following table presents the detail of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three months ended
September 30, 2013
:
(dollars in thousands)
Purchases
Sales
Issues
Settlements
Total
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2013 - Revised
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale securities:
Bonds:
Corporate debt
$
2,016
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
2,016
Trading securities:
Bonds:
CDO/ABS
—
—
—
(75
)
(75
)
Total
$
2,016
$
—
$
—
$
(75
)
$
1,941
50
Table of Contents
The following table presents changes for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Net gains (losses) included in:
Purchases,
sales,
issues,
settlements(a)
Transfers into
Level 3 (b)
Transfers
out of
Level 3 (c)
Balance
at end of
period
(dollars in thousands)
Balance at
beginning
of period
Other
revenues
Other
comprehensive
income (loss)
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale securities:
Bonds:
Corporate debt
$
12,604
$
177
$
(263
)
$
(8,393
)
$
—
$
—
$
4,125
RMBS
113
(14
)
(44
)
—
—
—
55
CMBS
2
—
13
—
—
—
15
CDO/ABS
800
—
3
—
—
(803
)
—
Total
13,519
163
(291
)
(8,393
)
—
(803
)
4,195
Other long-term investments
1,269
—
251
(90
)
—
—
1,430
Total available-for-sale securities
14,788
163
(40
)
(8,483
)
—
(803
)
5,625
Trading securities:
Bonds:
RMBS
—
4
—
(88
)
1,602
(1,157
)
361
CDO/ABS
7,383
5
—
(20
)
—
(938
)
6,430
Total trading securities
7,383
9
—
(108
)
1,602
(2,095
)
6,791
Total
$
22,171
$
172
$
(40
)
$
(8,591
)
$
1,602
$
(2,898
)
$
12,416
(a)
The detail of purchases, sales, issues, and settlements for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
is presented in the table below.
(b)
During the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, we transferred
$1.6 million
of RMBS securities into Level 3 primarily related to the re-evaluated observability of pricing inputs.
(c)
During the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, we transferred RMBS and CDO/ABS securities totaling
$2.9 million
out of Level 3 primarily related to the re-evaluated observability of pricing inputs.
51
Table of Contents
The following table presents the detail of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
:
(dollars in thousands)
Purchases
Sales
Issues
Settlements
Total
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale securities:
Bonds:
Corporate debt
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
(8,393
)
$
(8,393
)
Other long-term investments
—
—
—
(90
)
(90
)
Total available-for-sale securities
—
—
—
(8,483
)
(8,483
)
Trading securities:
Bonds:
RMBS
—
—
—
(88
)
(88
)
CDO/ABS
135
—
—
(155
)
(20
)
Total trading securities
135
—
—
(243
)
(108
)
Total
$
135
$
—
$
—
$
(8,726
)
$
(8,591
)
The following table presents changes for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Net gains (losses) included in:
Purchases,
sales,
issues,
settlements*
Transfers into
Level 3
Transfers
out of
Level 3
Balance
at end of
period
(dollars in thousands)
Balance at
beginning
of period
Other
revenues
Other
comprehensive
income (loss)
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013 - Revised
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale securities:
Bonds:
Corporate debt
$
13,417
$
(166
)
$
304
$
1,535
$
—
$
—
$
15,090
RMBS
74
(35
)
46
—
—
—
85
CMBS
1,767
(6
)
2
(1,761
)
—
—
2
CDO/ABS
2,834
8
(9
)
(2,033
)
—
—
800
Total
18,092
(199
)
343
(2,259
)
—
—
15,977
Other long-term investments
1,380
2
4
(11
)
—
—
1,375
Total available-for-sale securities
19,472
(197
)
347
(2,270
)
—
—
17,352
Trading securities:
Bonds:
CDO/ABS
12,192
562
(426
)
(4,695
)
—
—
7,633
Total
$
31,664
$
365
$
(79
)
$
(6,965
)
$
—
$
—
$
24,985
*
The detail of purchases, sales, issues, and settlements for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
is presented in the table below.
52
Table of Contents
The following table presents the detail of purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
:
(dollars in thousands)
Purchases
Sales
Issues
Settlements
Total
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013 - Revised
Investment securities:
Available-for-sale securities:
Bonds:
Corporate debt
$
2,016
$
—
$
—
$
(481
)
$
1,535
CMBS
—
(1,452
)
—
(309
)
(1,761
)
CDO/ABS
—
(1,633
)
—
(400
)
(2,033
)
Total
2,016
(3,085
)
—
(1,190
)
(2,259
)
Other long-term investments
—
—
—
(11
)
(11
)
Total available-for-sale securities
2,016
(3,085
)
—
(1,201
)
(2,270
)
Trading securities:
Bonds:
CDO/ABS
—
—
—
(4,695
)
(4,695
)
Total
$
2,016
$
(3,085
)
$
—
$
(5,896
)
$
(6,965
)
We used observable and/or unobservable inputs to determine the fair value of positions that we have classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses for assets and liabilities within the Level 3 category presented in the Level 3 tables above may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable (e.g., changes in unobservable long-dated volatilities) inputs.
The unobservable inputs and quantitative data used in our Level 3 valuations for our investment securities were developed and used in models created by our third-party valuation service providers, which values were used by us for fair value disclosure purposes without adjustment. We applied the third-party exception which allows us to omit certain quantitative disclosures about unobservable inputs for other long-term investments. As a result, the weighted average ranges of the inputs for these investment securities are not applicable in the following table.
Quantitative information about Level 3 inputs for our assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for which information about the unobservable inputs is reasonably available to us at
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
is as follows:
Range (Weighted Average)
Valuation Technique(s)
Unobservable Input
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Corporate debt
Discounted cash flows
Yield
0.89% (a)
2.68% – 8.48%
(4.67%)
RMBS
Discounted cash flows
Spread
6.94% (b)
Other long-term investments
Discounted cash flows and indicative valuations
Historical costs Nature of investment Local market conditions Comparables Operating performance Recent financing activity
N/A (c)
N/A (c)
(a)
At
September 30, 2014
, corporate debt consisted of
one
bond.
(b)
At
September 30, 2014
, RMBS consisted of
one
bond.
(c)
Not applicable.
The fair values of the assets using significant unobservable inputs are sensitive and can be impacted by significant increases or decreases in any of those inputs. Level 3 broker-priced instruments, including RMBS (except for the one bond previously noted), CMBS, and CDO/ABS, are excluded from the table above because the unobservable inputs are not reasonably available to us.
53
Table of Contents
Our RMBS, CMBS, and CDO/ABS securities have unobservable inputs that are reliant on and sensitive to the quality of their underlying collateral. The inputs, although not identical, have similar characteristics and interrelationships. Generally a change in the assumption used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumption used for prepayment speeds. An improvement in the workout criteria related to the restructured debt and/or debt covenants of the underlying collateral may lead to an improvement in the cash flows and have an inverse impact on other inputs, specifically a reduction in the amount of discount applied for marketability and liquidity, making the structured bonds more attractive to market participants.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS — NON-RECURRING BASIS
We measure the fair value of certain assets on a non-recurring basis when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis on which we recorded impairment charges were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements Using
(dollars in thousands)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
September 30, 2014
Assets
Real estate owned
$
—
$
—
$
32,220
$
32,220
Commercial mortgage loans
—
—
10,792
10,792
Total
$
—
$
—
$
43,012
$
43,012
December 31, 2013
Assets
Real estate owned
$
—
$
—
$
72,242
$
72,242
Commercial mortgage loans
—
—
11,935
11,935
Total
$
—
$
—
$
84,177
$
84,177
Net impairment charges recorded on assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Assets
Real estate owned
$
3,186
$
5,731
$
13,052
$
19,389
Commercial mortgage loans
(717
)
(61
)
(1,773
)
(1,774
)
Total
$
2,469
$
5,670
$
11,279
$
17,615
In accordance with the authoritative guidance for the accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets, we wrote down certain real estate owned reported in our Real Estate segment to their fair value less cost to sell for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
and recorded the writedowns in other revenues — other. The fair values of real estate owned disclosed in the table above are unadjusted for transaction costs as required by the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements. The amounts of real estate owned recorded in other assets are net of transaction costs as required by the authoritative guidance for accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets.
In accordance with the authoritative guidance for the accounting for the impairment of commercial mortgage loans, we recorded allowance adjustments on certain impaired commercial mortgage loans reported in our Insurance segment to record their fair value for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
and recorded the net impairments in investment revenues.
54
Table of Contents
The unobservable inputs and quantitative data used in our Level 3 valuations for our real estate owned and commercial mortgage loans were developed and used in models created by our third-party valuation service providers or valuations provided by external parties, which values were used by us for fair value disclosure purposes without adjustment. We applied the third-party exception which allows us to omit certain quantitative disclosures about unobservable inputs. As a result, the weighted average ranges of the inputs are not applicable in the following table.
Quantitative information about Level 3 inputs for our assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at
September 30, 2014
and
December 31, 2013
is as follows:
Range (Weighted Average)
Valuation Technique(s)
Unobservable Input
September 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Real estate owned
Market approach
Third-party valuation
N/A*
N/A*
Commercial mortgage loans
Market approach
Local market conditions Nature of investment Comparable property sales Operating performance
N/A*
N/A*
*
Not applicable.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS — VALUATION METHODOLOGIES AND ASSUMPTIONS
We use the following methods and assumptions to estimate fair value.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value.
Mutual Funds
The fair value of mutual funds is based on quoted market prices of the underlying shares held in the mutual funds.
Investment Securities
We utilize third-party valuation service providers to measure the fair value of our investment securities, which are classified as available-for-sale or as trading and consist primarily of bonds. Whenever available, we obtain quoted prices in active markets for identical assets at the balance sheet date to measure investment securities at fair value. We generally obtain market price data from exchange or dealer markets.
We estimate the fair value of fixed maturity investment securities not traded in active markets by referring to traded securities with similar attributes, using dealer quotations and a matrix pricing methodology, or discounted cash flow analyses. This methodology considers such factors as the issuer’s industry, the security’s rating and tenor, its coupon rate, its position in the capital structure of the issuer, yield curves, credit curves, prepayment rates and other relevant factors. For fixed maturity investment securities that are not traded in active markets or that are subject to transfer restrictions, we adjust the valuations to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability. Such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, management’s best estimate is used.
We classify investment securities that are deemed to incorporate an embedded derivative and for which it is impracticable for us to isolate and/or value as trading securities at fair value.
Finance Receivables
The fair value of net finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses, both non-impaired and purchased credit impaired, are determined using discounted cash flow methodologies. The application of these methodologies requires us to make certain judgments and estimates based on our perception of market participant views related to the economic and competitive environment, the characteristics of our finance receivables, and other similar factors. The most significant judgments and estimates made relate to prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity, and discount rates. The degree of judgment and estimation applied is significant in light of the current capital markets and, more broadly, economic environments. Therefore, the fair value of our finance receivables could not be determined with precision and may not be
55
Table of Contents
realized in an actual sale. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in the valuation methodologies we employed, and changes in the underlying assumptions used could significantly affect the results of current or future values.
Finance Receivables Held for Sale
We determined the fair value of finance receivables held for sale that were originated as held for investment based on negotiations with prospective purchasers (if any) or by using projected cash flows discounted at the weighted-average interest rates offered by us in the market for similar finance receivables. We based cash flows on contractual payment terms adjusted for estimates of prepayments and credit related losses.
Restricted Cash
The carrying amount of restricted cash approximates fair value.
Commercial Mortgage Loans
We utilize third-party valuation service providers to estimate the fair value of commercial mortgage loans using projected cash flows discounted at an appropriate rate based upon market conditions.
Real Estate Owned
We initially based our estimate of the fair value on independent third-party valuations at the time we took title to real estate owned. Subsequent changes in fair value are based upon independent third-party valuations obtained periodically to estimate a price that would be received in a then current transaction to sell the asset.
Escrow Advance Receivable
The carrying amount reported in our condensed consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value.
Long-term Debt
We either receive fair value measurements of our long-term debt from market participants and pricing services or we estimate the fair values of long-term debt using projected cash flows discounted at each balance sheet date’s market-observable implicit-credit spread rates for our long-term debt and adjusted for foreign currency translations.
We record long-term debt issuances at fair value that are deemed to incorporate an embedded derivative and for which it is impracticable for us to isolate and/or value the derivative. At September 30, 2014, there was no significant difference between the fair value and the principal amount of the long-term debt for which we have elected the fair value option.
19. Pro Forma Information
The following unaudited pro forma information presents the combined results of operations of SHI and from the acquisitions of finance receivables and the London, Kentucky loan servicing facility from HSBC (the “HSBC acquisitions”) during 2013 as if the HSBC acquisitions had occurred on January 1, 2013. The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the financial position or results of operations actually would have been had the HSBC acquisitions been completed on January 1, 2013. In addition, the unaudited pro forma financial information is not indicative of, nor does it purport to project, the future financial position or operating results of the HSBC acquisitions. The unaudited pro forma information assumes the full funding of the HSBC acquisitions including the issuance of the associated Class B Notes from our SpringCastle securitization as if they were issued as of January 1, 2013, the adjustment of historical finance charges for estimated impacts of accounting for credit impaired loans and the incorporation of accretion of pro forma purchase discount, and does not give effect to potential cost savings or other operating efficiencies that could result from the HSBC acquisitions.
56
Table of Contents
The following table presents the unaudited pro forma financial information:
(dollars in thousands except earnings (loss) per share)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Revised
Revised
Interest income
$
574,291
$
1,728,429
Net income (loss) attributable to Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
$
(101,976
)
$
(41,960
)
Net income (loss) attributable to Springleaf Holdings, Inc. per weighted average share:
Basic
$
(1.02
)
$
(0.42
)
Diluted
$
(1.02
)
$
(0.42
)
20. Subsequent Events
SPRINGCASTLE 2014-A NOTES
On October 3, 2014, certain indirect subsidiaries of SFC associated with a joint venture in which we own a
47%
equity interest (the “Co-Issuers”) issued
$2.62 billion
of the SpringCastle Funding Asset-backed Notes 2014-A (the “SpringCastle 2014-A Notes”) at a
4.68%
weighted average yield in a private placement transaction. The SpringCastle 2014-A Notes are collateralized by the SpringCastle Portfolio in which SFC owns a
47%
equity interest as a result of SFI’s capital contribution of
100%
of SAC’s common stock to SFC on July 31, 2014.
The Co-Issuers sold the SpringCastle 2014-A Notes for approximately
$2.55 billion
after the price discount but before expenses. The Co-Issuers used the proceeds from the SpringCastle 2014-A Notes to repay in full on October 3, 2014 the SpringCastle Funding Asset-backed Notes 2013-A (the “SpringCastle 2013-A Notes”), which were issued by the Co-Issuers on April 1, 2013. At September 30, 2014, the unpaid principal balance of the SpringCastle 2013-A Notes was
$1.46 billion
.
On October 3, 2014, SAC purchased
$362.5 million
initial principal amount of the SpringCastle 2014-A Notes. The Co-Issuers retained
$61.6 million
of the SpringCastle 2014-A Notes. Certain subsidiaries of NRZ own a
30%
equity interest in the Co-Issuers. NRZ is managed by an affiliate of Fortress.
NON-CORE REAL ESTATE LOAN TRANSACTIONS
Proceeds from September Whole Loan Sales
The aggregate purchase price of
$795.1 million
for the September Whole Loan Sales included a holdback provision of $
120 million
of which $
40 million
was subject to finalization of the terms and conditions of administering the holdback and the remainder was subject to our ability to cure certain documentation deficiencies within the
60
day period (subject to extension under certain circumstances) subsequent to the closing of the sale. On October 16 and November 7, 2014, we received
$20 million
and
$21.8 million
, respectively, of the holdback provision from Credit Suisse.
Proceeds from MSR Sale
On October 23, 2014, we received
$15.7 million
from Nationstar, which reflected
40%
of the proceeds due from the MSR Sale (
50%
of the proceeds were received on August 29, 2014). The remaining
10%
is subject to a holdback for resolution of missing documentation and other customary conditions, and is expected to be received no later than
120 days
after the date of transfer of servicing upon resolution of these conditions. Investment funds managed by affiliates of Fortress indirectly own a majority interest in Nationstar.
57
Table of Contents
The “November Whole Loan Sales”
As discussed in Note 1, on August 6, 2014, SFC and Credit Suisse agreed to the terms of the Probable Whole Loan Sales. We completed the second sale of certain performing and non-performing mortgage loans on November 7, 2014. The real estate loans included in the November Whole Loan Sales had a carrying value of
$251.0 million
(after the basis adjustment for the related allowance for finance receivable losses) as of September 30, 2014.
The aggregate purchase price of
$270.1 million
for the November Whole Loan Sales included a holdback provision of
$34.3 million
, which is subject to our ability to cure certain documentation deficiencies within a
60 day
period (subject to extension under certain circumstances) subsequent to the closing of the sale. On November 7, 2014, we received
$235.8 million
of the proceeds from Credit Suisse.
58
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
This report may contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that reflect our current views with respect to, among other things, future events and financial performance. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words such as “outlook,” “believes,” “expects,” “potential,” “continues,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “predicts,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates” or the negative version of those words or other comparable words. Any forward-looking statements contained in this report are based upon our historical performance and on our current plans, estimates and expectations in light of information currently available to us. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, financial results, financial condition, business, prospects, growth strategy and liquidity. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe that these factors include, but are not limited to:
•
changes in general economic conditions, including the interest rate environment in which we conduct business and the financial markets through which we can access capital and also invest cash flows from our Insurance segment;
•
levels of unemployment and personal bankruptcies;
•
natural or accidental events such as earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, fires, or floods affecting our customers, collateral, or branches or other operating facilities;
•
war, acts of terrorism, riots, civil disruption, pandemics, or other events disrupting business or commerce;
•
the effect of future sales of our remaining portfolio of real estate loans and the transfer of servicing for these loans;
•
changes in the rate at which we can collect or potentially sell our finance receivables portfolio;
•
the effectiveness of our credit risk scoring models in assessing the risk of customer unwillingness or lack of capacity to repay;
•
changes in our ability to attract and retain employees or key executives to support our businesses;
•
changes in the competitive environment in which we operate, including the demand for our products, customer responsiveness to our distribution channels, and the strength and ability of our competitors to operate independently or to enter into business combinations that result in a more attractive range of customer products or provide greater financial resources;
•
shifts in collateral values, delinquencies, or credit losses;
•
changes in federal, state and local laws, regulations, or regulatory policies and practices, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (which, among other things, established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which has broad authority to regulate and examine financial institutions), that affect our ability to conduct business or the manner in which we conduct business, such as licensing requirements, pricing limitations or restrictions on the method of offering products, as well as changes that may result from increased regulatory scrutiny of the sub-prime lending industry;
•
potential liability relating to real estate and personal loans which we have sold or may sell in the future, or relating to securitized loans, if it is determined that there was a non-curable breach of a warranty made in connection with such transactions;
•
the costs and effects of any litigation or governmental inquiries or investigations involving us, particularly those that are determined adversely to us;
•
our continued ability to access the capital markets or the sufficiency of our current sources of funds to satisfy our cash flow requirements;
•
our ability to comply with our debt covenants;
•
our ability to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness;
•
our substantial indebtedness, which could prevent us from meeting our obligations under our debt instruments and limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry, or our ability to incur additional borrowings;
•
the potential for downgrade of our debt by rating agencies, which would have a negative impact on our cost of, and access to, capital;
•
the impacts of our securitizations and borrowings;
•
our ability to maintain sufficient capital levels in our regulated and unregulated subsidiaries;
•
the material weakness that we have identified in our internal control over financial reporting; and
•
changes in accounting standards or tax policies and practices and the application of such new policies and practices to the manner in which we conduct business.
59
Table of Contents
We also direct readers to other risks and uncertainties discussed in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The forward-looking statements made in this report relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or review any forward-looking statement except as required by law, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.
If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from what we may have expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We caution that you should not place undue reliance on any of our forward-looking statements. You should specifically consider the factors identified in this report that could cause actual results to differ before making an investment decision to purchase our common stock. Furthermore, new risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and it is impossible for us to predict those events or how they may affect us.
Overview
Springleaf is a leading consumer finance company providing responsible loan products primarily to non-prime customers. We originate consumer loans through our network of nearly 830 branch offices in 26 states and on a centralized basis as part of our iLoan division. Through two insurance subsidiaries, we write credit and non-credit insurance policies covering our customers and the property pledged as collateral for our loans. We also pursue strategic acquisitions of loan portfolios. As part of this strategy, in April 2013 we acquired from HSBC a $3.9 billion UPB consumer loan portfolio through a joint venture in which we own a 47% equity interest.
At
September 30, 2014
, we had four business segments: Consumer, Insurance, Acquisitions and Servicing, and Real Estate. See Note 16 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our segments.
OUR PRODUCTS
Our core product offerings include:
•
Personal Loans —
We offer personal loans through our branch network and over the internet through our iLoan division to customers who generally need timely access to cash. Our personal loans are typically non-revolving with a fixed-rate and a fixed, original term of two to four years. At
September 30, 2014
, we had over 902,000 personal loans, representing
$3.6 billion
of net finance receivables, of which
$1.7 billion
, or
48%
, were secured by collateral consisting of titled personal property (such as automobiles),
$1.3 billion
, or
37%
, were secured by consumer household goods or other items of personal property, and the remainder were unsecured.
•
Insurance Products —
We offer our customers credit insurance (life insurance, accident and health insurance, and involuntary unemployment insurance), non-credit insurance, and ancillary products, such as warranty protection, through both our branch operations and our iLoan division. Credit insurance and non-credit insurance products are provided by our subsidiaries, Merit and Yosemite Insurance Company (“Yosemite”). The ancillary products are home security and auto security membership plans and home appliance service contracts of unaffiliated companies.
•
SpringCastle Portfolio —
We acquired the SpringCastle Portfolio from HSBC on April 1, 2013 through a joint venture in which we own a
47%
equity interest. These loans included unsecured loans and loans secured by subordinate residential real estate mortgages (which we service as unsecured loans due to the fact that the liens are subordinated to superior ranking security interests). The SpringCastle Portfolio includes both closed-end accounts and open-end lines of credit. These loans are in a liquidating status and vary in substance and form from our originated loans. SFI assumed the direct servicing obligations for these loans in September 2013. At
September 30, 2014
, the SpringCastle Portfolio included over 291,000 of acquired loans, representing
$2.1 billion
in net finance receivables.
Our legacy products include:
•
Real Estate Loans —
We ceased real estate lending in January 2012. These loans may be closed-end accounts or open-end home equity lines of credit, generally have a fixed rate and maximum original terms of 360 months, and are secured by first or second mortgages on residential real estate. At
September 30, 2014
,
$233.8 million
of real estate loans, or
36%
, were secured by first mortgages and
$421.5 million
, or
64%
, were secured by second mortgages. We continue to service the liquidating real estate loans and support any advances on open-end accounts.
60
Table of Contents
•
Retail Sales Finance —
We ceased purchasing retail sales contracts and revolving retail accounts in January 2013. We continue to service the liquidating retail sales contracts and will provide revolving retail sales financing services on our revolving retail accounts. We refer to retail sales contracts and revolving retail accounts collectively as “retail sales finance.”
Recent Developments
NON-CORE REAL ESTATE LOAN TRANSACTIONS
During the first nine months of 2014, we entered into a series of transactions relating to the sales of our beneficial interests in our non-core real estate loans, the related servicing of these loans, and the sales of certain performing and non-performing real estate loans. During the first nine months of 2014, we sold finance receivables held for sale with a carrying value of
$6.1 billion
and recorded net gains totaling
$731.3 million
. As a result of these transactions, we established a reserve for sales recourse obligations of $9.9 million during the third quarter of 2014. On November 7, 2014, we sold finance receivables held for sale with a carrying value of
$251.0 million
as of September 30, 2014. These transactions substantially complete the Company’s previously disclosed plan to liquidate its non-core real estate loans. See Note 1 and Note 20 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on these sales.
In conjunction with these real estate loan transactions, we have closed our operational locations in Dallas, Texas, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and Wesley Chapel, Florida, and have eliminated certain staff positions in our Evansville, Indiana, location. In total, approximately
300
staff positions were eliminated. However, the total reduction in workforce was approximately
170
employees, as
130
employees have been transferred into other positions at Springleaf. We recorded restructuring costs of
$4.3 million
in the third quarter of 2014 due to the workforce reductions and the closings of the servicing facilities.
Our insurance subsidiaries have written certain insurance policies on properties collateralizing the loans that have been deconsolidated or disposed of as a result of these sales. As part of the disposition, the insurance policies associated with the sold loans have been or will be cancelled.
CREDIT RATINGS
Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”), Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”), and Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) upgraded SFC’s long-term corporate debt rating as follows: (i) from B3 to B2 with a stable outlook by Moody’s on October 8, 2014; (ii) from B- to B with a stable outlook by S&P on August 8, 2014; and (iii) from B- to B with a stable outlook by Fitch on August 7, 2014.
SECURITIZATIONS
Whitford Brook 2014-VFN1 Securitization
On June 26, 2014, we established a private securitization facility in which Whitford Brook 2014-VFN1 Trust, a wholly owned special purpose vehicle of SFC, may issue variable funding notes with a maximum principal balance of
$300 million
to be backed by personal loans acquired from subsidiaries of SFC. The notes will be funded over a
three
-year period, subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions precedent. During this period, the notes can also be paid down to the required minimum balance of
$100 million
and then redrawn. Following the
three
-year funding period, the principal amount of the notes will be reduced as cash payments are received on the underlying personal loans and will be due and payable in full in July 2018, unless an option to prepay is elected between July 2017 and July 2018. At
September 30, 2014
, the required minimum balance of
$100 million
was drawn under the notes.
2014-A Securitization
On March 26, 2014, we completed a private securitization transaction in which a wholly owned special purpose vehicle of SFC sold $559.3 million of notes backed by personal loans held by the 2014-A Trust, at a 2.62% weighted average yield. We sold the asset-backed notes for
$559.2 million
, after the price discount but before expenses and a
$6.4 million
interest reserve requirement. We initially retained
$32.9 million
of the 2014-A Trust’s subordinate asset-backed notes.
61
Table of Contents
Renewal of Midbrook 2013-VFN1 Securitization
On June 13, 2014, we amended the note purchase agreement with Midbrook 2013-VFN1 Trust, a wholly owned special purpose vehicle of SFC, to extend the
one
-year funding period to a
two
-year funding period. Following the
two
-year funding period, the principal amount of the notes, if any, will be reduced as cash payments are received on the underlying personal loans and will be due and payable in full in July 2019. The maximum principal balance of variable funding notes that can be issued remained at
$300 million
. No amounts have been funded.
Repayment of 2013-BAC Trust Notes
On September 25, 2013, we completed a private securitization transaction in which Springleaf Funding Trust 2013-BAC, a wholly owned special purpose vehicle of SFC, issued
$500 million
of notes backed by an amortizing pool of personal loans acquired from subsidiaries of SFC. On March 27, 2014, we repaid the entire $231.3 million outstanding principal balance of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
SpringCastle 2014-A Notes
On October 3, 2014, the Co-Issuers issued $2.62 billion of the SpringCastle 2014-A Notes at a weighted average yield of
4.68%
in a private placement transaction. The SpringCastle 2014-A Notes are collateralized by the SpringCastle Portfolio in which SFC owns a 47% equity interest as a result of SFI’s capital contribution of 100% of SAC’s common stock to SFC on July 31, 2014.
The Co-Issuers sold the SpringCastle 2014-A Notes for approximately $2.55 billion after the price discount but before expenses. The Co-Issuers used the proceeds from the SpringCastle 2014-A Notes to repay in full on October 3, 2014 the SpringCastle 2013-A Notes, which were issued by the Co-Issuers on April 1, 2013. At September 30, 2014, the unpaid principal balance of the SpringCastle 2013-A Notes was $1.46 billion.
On October 3, 2014, SAC purchased $362.5 million initial principal amount of the SpringCastle 2014-A Notes. The Co-Issuers retained $61.6 million of the SpringCastle 2014-A Notes.
PREPAYMENT OF SECURED TERM LOAN
On March 31, 2014, SFFC prepaid, without penalty or premium, the entire
$750.0 million
outstanding principal balance of the secured term loan, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Effective upon the prepayment, all obligations of SFFC, SFC, and most of the consumer finance operating subsidiaries of SFC under the secured term loan (other than contingent reimbursement obligations and indemnity obligations) were terminated and all guarantees and security interests were released.
OUTLOOK
Assuming the U.S. economy continues to experience slow to moderate growth, we expect to continue our long history of strong credit performance. We believe the strong credit quality of our personal loan portfolio is the result of our disciplined underwriting practices and ongoing collection efforts. We also continue to see growth in the volume of personal loan originations driven by the following factors:
•
Declining competition from thrifts and banks (although banks continue to serve non-prime customers in other ways) as these institutions have retreated from the non-prime market in the face of regulatory scrutiny and in the aftermath of the housing crisis. As a result of the reduced lending of these competitors, access to credit has fallen substantially for the non-prime segment of customers, which, in turn, has increased our potential customer base.
•
Slow but sustained economic growth.
•
Migration of customer activity from traditional channels such as direct mail to online channels (served by our iLoan division) where we believe we are well suited to capture volume due to our scale, technology, and deployment of advanced analytics.
•
Our renewed focus on our personal loan business as we have discontinued real estate and other product originations both in our branches and in centralized lending.
In addition, with an experienced management team, a strong balance sheet, proven access to the capital markets, and strong demand for consumer credit, we believe we are well positioned for future personal loan growth.
62
Table of Contents
We regularly consider strategic acquisitions and have been involved in transactions of various magnitudes involving a variety of forms of consideration and financing. Currently, we are evaluating a number of strategic acquisition opportunities, including one opportunity which, if consummated, would be the most significant acquisition transaction ever undertaken by the Company. The purchase price for possible acquisitions could be financed through the issuance of equity (which could significantly increase the number of shares of SHI’s common stock outstanding) or debt securities, bank borrowings, securitizations or a combination thereof. We cannot predict if any such acquisitions will be consummated or, if consummated, will result in a financial or other benefit to the Company. See the discussion under the heading “Risk Factors - There are risks associated with the acquisition of large loan portfolios, such as the SpringCastle Portfolio, including the possibility of increased delinquencies and losses, difficulties with integrating the loans into our servicing platform and disruption to our ongoing business, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC for additional information.
Prior Period Revisions
As disclosed in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K, we identified certain out-of-period errors in preparing our annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2013
. In addition to these errors, we had previously recorded and disclosed out-of-period adjustments in prior reporting periods when the errors were discovered. As a result, we revised all previously reported periods included in our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K. Similarly, we have revised all previously reported periods included in this report. We corrected the errors identified in the fourth quarter of 2013 and included these corrections in the appropriate prior periods. In addition, we reversed all out-of period adjustments previously recorded and disclosed, and included the adjustments in the appropriate periods. After evaluating the quantitative and qualitative aspects of these corrections, we have determined that our previous quarterly and annual consolidated financial statements were not materially misstated.
See Note 17 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the prior period revisions. All prior period data presented in the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations reflects the revised balances.
63
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS
See table below for our consolidated operating results. A further discussion of our operating results for each of our business segments is provided under “—Segment Results.”
(dollars in thousands except earnings (loss) per share)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Interest income:
Finance charges
$
435,445
$
583,926
$
1,513,590
$
1,577,561
Finance receivables held for sale originated as held for investment
47,679
—
54,921
—
Total interest income
483,124
583,926
1,568,511
1,577,561
Interest expense
180,142
229,157
576,863
700,868
Net interest income
302,982
354,769
991,648
876,693
Provision for finance receivable losses
102,971
162,264
379,196
339,061
Net interest income after provision for finance receivable losses
200,011
192,505
612,452
537,632
Other revenues:
Insurance
44,010
38,277
125,116
107,144
Investment
11,251
6,532
31,334
27,254
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt
—
(33,572
)
(6,615
)
(33,809
)
Net gain (loss) on fair value adjustments on debt
1,352
6,586
(15,033
)
7,097
Net gain on sales of real estate loans and related trust assets
641,328
—
731,314
—
Other
(11,975
)
1,603
(7,403
)
6,986
Total other revenues
685,966
19,426
858,713
114,672
Other expenses:
Operating expenses:
Salaries and benefits
94,702
214,552
278,504
371,842
Other operating expenses
75,117
72,478
192,889
194,457
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
20,141
16,550
57,173
47,650
Total other expenses
189,960
303,580
528,566
613,949
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes
696,017
(91,649
)
942,599
38,355
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
234,322
(30,698
)
309,594
(1,998
)
Net income (loss)
461,695
(60,951
)
633,005
40,353
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
34,945
31,643
81,542
86,383
Net income (loss) attributable to Springleaf
$
426,750
$
(92,594
)
$
551,463
$
(46,030
)
Share Data:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic
114,788,439
100,000,000
114,788,439
100,000,000
Diluted
115,316,314
100,000,000
115,212,398
100,000,000
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic
$
3.72
$
(0.93
)
$
4.80
$
(0.46
)
Diluted
$
3.70
$
(0.93
)
$
4.79
$
(0.46
)
64
Table of Contents
Comparison of Consolidated Results for Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
Finance charges
decreased
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
due to the net of the following:
(dollars in thousands)
2014 compared to 2013 - Three Months Ended September 30
Decrease in average net receivables
$
(173,878
)
Increase in yield
25,397
Total
$
(148,481
)
Average net receivables decreased for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to our liquidating real estate loan portfolio, including the transfers of real estate loans with a total carrying value of $6.7 billion to finance receivables held for sale and the subsequent sales of nearly all of these real estate loans during the first
nine
months of
2014
. This decrease also reflected lower SpringCastle average net receivables resulting from liquidations, partially offset by higher personal loan average net receivables.
Yield increased for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily from our personal loans, which have higher yields. This increase also reflected a higher proportion of personal loans as a result of the transfers of real estate loans to finance receivables held for sale on August 1, 2014.
Interest expense
decreased
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
due to the net of the following:
(dollars in thousands)
2014 compared to 2013 - Three Months Ended September 30
Decrease in average debt
$
(65,804
)
Increase in weighted average interest rate
16,789
Total
$
(49,015
)
Average debt decreased for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to debt repurchases and repayments of $3.8 billion during the past twelve months and the elimination of $3.5 billion of debt associated with our mortgage securitizations as a result of the sales of the Company’s beneficial interests in the mortgage-backed certificates during the first nine months of 2014. These decreases were partially offset by debt issuances pursuant to three consumer securitization transactions completed during the past twelve months.
The weighted average interest rate on our debt increased for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to the elimination of debt associated with our mortgage securitizations discussed above, which generally have lower interest rates. This increase was partially offset by the debt repurchases and repayments discussed above, which resulted in lower accretion of net discount applied to long-term debt.
Provision for finance receivable losses
decreased
$59.3 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to a reduction in the allowance requirements on our real estate loans deemed to be purchased credit impaired finance receivables and TDR finance receivables subsequent to the Fortress Acquisition as a result of the transfers of real estate loans with a total carrying value of $6.7 billion to finance receivables held for sale and the subsequent sales of nearly all of these real estate loans during the first
nine
months of
2014
. This decrease was partially offset by additional allowance requirements primarily due to growth in our personal loans during the
2014
period and higher personal loan delinquency ratio at
September 30, 2014
.
Net
loss
on repurchases and repayments of debt of
$33.6 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2013 reflected acceleration of amortization of deferred costs and repurchases of debt at net amounts greater than carrying value.
Net
gain
on sales of real estate loans and related trust assets of
$641.3 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
reflected the reversal of the remaining unaccreted push-down accounting basis for the real estate loans, less allowance for
65
Table of Contents
finance receivable losses that we established at the date of the Fortress Acquisition. See Note 1 of the Notes to Condensed Financial Statements for further information on these sales.
Other revenues
decreased
$13.6 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2014 when compared to the same period in 2013 primarily due to net charge-offs on our finance receivables held for sale and provision adjustments for liquidated held for sale accounts during the 2014 period. This decrease was partially offset by servicing fee revenues for the servicing of the real estate loans included in the MSR Sale. We continued to service these loans on behalf of Nationstar until the servicing transfer on September 30, 2014, under an interim servicing agreement.
Salaries and benefits
decreased
$119.9 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to $131.3 million of share-based compensation expense due to the grant of RSUs to certain of our executives in the third quarter of
2013
. This decrease was partially offset by: (i) employee retention and severance accruals of $3.8 million recorded in the third quarter of 2014 due to the recent workforce reduction of approximately 170 employees and (ii) higher salary and bonus accruals reflecting an increase in number of employees and increased originations of personal loans.
Other operating expenses
increased
$2.6 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to higher professional fees of $24.1 million primarily due to one-time costs and restructuring costs relating to the real estate sales transactions and higher advertising and information technology expenses during the 2014 period. This increase was partially offset by servicing fee expenses charged by HSBC to service the SpringCastle Portfolio pursuant to an interim servicing agreement that was in place between April 1, 2013 and August 31, 2013.
Provision for income taxes totaled
$234.3 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to benefit from income taxes of
$30.7 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2013
. The effective tax rate for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
was
33.7%
compared to
33.5%
for the same period in
2013
. The effective tax rates for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
differed from the federal statutory rates primarily due to the effect of the non-controlling interest in our joint venture, partially offset by the effect of our state income taxes.
Comparison of Consolidated Results for
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
Finance charges
decreased
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
due to the net of the following:
(dollars in thousands)
2014 compared to 2013 - Nine Months Ended September 30
Decrease in average net receivables
$
(164,493
)
Increase in yield
100,522
Total
$
(63,971
)
Average net receivables decreased for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to our liquidating real estate loan portfolio, including the transfers of real estate loans with a total carrying value of $6.7 billion to finance receivables held for sale and the subsequent sales of nearly all of these real estate loans during the first nine months of 2014. This decrease also reflected lower SpringCastle average net receivables resulting from liquidations, partially offset by higher personal loan average net receivables.
Yield increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 when compared to the same period in 2013 primarily from our personal loans, which have higher yields. This increase also reflected a higher proportion of personal loans as a result of the transfers of real estate loans to finance receivables held for sale during the first nine months of 2014.
Finance charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 when compared to the same period in 2013 were favorably impacted by an additional three months of finance charges on the SpringCastle Portfolio totaling $143.2 million, which is included in the change in average net receivables and yield in the table above.
66
Table of Contents
Interest expense
decreased
for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 when compared to the same period in 2013 due to the following:
(dollars in thousands)
2014 compared to 2013 - Nine Months Ended September 30
Decrease in average debt
$
(112,141
)
Decrease in weighted average interest rate
(11,864
)
Total
$
(124,005
)
Average debt decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 when compared to the same period in 2013 primarily due to debt repurchases and repayments of $3.8 billion during the past twelve months and the elimination of $3.5 billion of debt associated with our mortgage securitizations as a result of the sales of the Company’s beneficial interests in the mortgage-backed certificates during the first nine months of 2014. These decreases were partially offset by debt issuances pursuant to three consumer securitization transactions completed during the past twelve months.
The weighted average interest rate on our debt decreased for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to the debt repurchases and repayments discussed above, which resulted in lower accretion of net discount applied to long-term debt. This decrease was partially offset by the elimination of debt associated with our mortgage securitizations discussed above, which generally have lower interest rates.
Interest expense for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in 2013 included an additional three months of interest expense on the long-term debt associated with the securitization of the SpringCastle Portfolio totaling $22.2 million, which is included in the change in average debt and weighted average interest rate in the table above.
Provision for finance receivable losses
increased
$40.1 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to
$39.6 million
of recoveries recorded in June 2013 resulting from a sale of previously charged-off finance receivables in June 2013 (net of a
$1.6 million
adjustment for the subsequent buyback of certain finance receivables). This increase also reflected additional allowance requirements primarily due to growth in our personal loans during the 2014 period and higher personal loan delinquency ratio at
September 30, 2014
. This increase was partially offset by a reduction in the allowance requirements on our real estate loans deemed to be purchased credit impaired finance receivables and TDR finance receivables subsequent to the Fortress Acquisition as a result of the transfers of real estate loans with a total carrying value of $6.7 billion to finance receivables held for sale and the subsequent sales of nearly all of these real estate loans during the first
nine
months of
2014
.
Net
loss
on repurchases and repayments of debt of
$6.6 million
and
$33.8 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and 2013, respectively, reflected repurchases of debt at net amounts greater than carrying value.
Net
loss
on fair value adjustments on debt of
$15.0 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and net
gain
on fair value adjustments on debt of $7.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, reflected net unrealized (loss) gain, respectively, on fair value adjustments of the long-term debt associated with the securitization of the SpringCastle Portfolio that is accounted for at fair value through earnings.
Net
gain
on sales of real estate loans and related trust assets of
$731.3 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
reflected the reversal of the remaining unaccreted push-down accounting basis for the real estate loans, less allowance for finance receivable losses that we established at the date of the Fortress Acquisition. See Note 1 of the Notes to Condensed Financial Statements for further information on these sales.
Other revenues
decreased
$14.4 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 when compared to the same period in 2013 primarily due to net charge-offs on our finance receivables held for sale and provision adjustments for liquidated held for sale accounts during the 2014 period. This decrease was partially offset by servicing fee revenues for the servicing of the real estate loans included in the MSR Sale. We continued to service these loans on behalf of Nationstar until the servicing transfer on September 30, 2014, under an interim servicing agreement.
Salaries and benefits
decreased
$93.3 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to $131.3 million of share-based compensation expense due to the grant of RSUs to certain of our
67
Table of Contents
executives in the third quarter of
2013
. This decrease was partially offset by: (i) employee retention and severance accruals of $3.8 million recorded in the third quarter of 2014 due to the recent workforce reduction of approximately 170 employees; (ii) higher salary accruals reflecting an increase in number of employees and increased originations of personal loans; and (iii) share-based compensation expenses during the 2014 period due to the grant of RSUs to certain of our executives and employees subsequent to the initial public offering of SHI common stock.
Provision for income taxes totaled
$309.6 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
compared to benefit from income taxes of
$2.0 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
. The effective tax rate for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
was
32.8%
compared to
(5.2)%
for the same period in
2013
. The effective tax rates for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
differed from the federal statutory rates primarily due to the effect of the non-controlling interest in our joint venture, partially offset by the effect of our state income taxes.
Reconciliation of Income (Loss) before Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes on Push-Down Accounting Basis to Historical Accounting Basis
Due to the nature of the Fortress Acquisition, we revalued our assets and liabilities based on their fair values at November 30, 2010, the date of the Fortress Acquisition, in accordance with business combination accounting standards, or push-down accounting. Push-down accounting affected and continues to affect, among other things, the carrying amount of our finance receivables and long-term debt, our finance charges on our finance receivables and related yields, our interest expense, our allowance for finance receivable losses, and our net charge-offs and charge-off ratio. In general, on a quarterly basis, we accrete or amortize the valuation adjustments recorded in connection with the Fortress Acquisition, or record adjustments based on current expected cash flows as compared to expected cash flows at the time of the Fortress Acquisition, in each case, as described in more detail in the footnotes to the table below. In addition, push-down accounting resulted in the elimination of accretion or amortization of discounts, premiums, and other deferred costs on our finance receivables and long-term debt prior to the Fortress Acquisition. The reconciliations of income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes on a push-down accounting basis to income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes on a historical accounting basis (which is a basis of accounting other than U.S. GAAP that we believe provides a consistent basis for both management and other interested third parties to better understand our operating results) were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes - push-down accounting basis
$
696,017
$
(91,649
)
$
942,599
$
38,355
Interest income adjustments (a)
(17,067
)
(51,635
)
(88,294
)
(153,674
)
Interest expense adjustments (b)
36,359
33,476
99,886
102,977
Provision for finance receivable losses adjustments (c)
(19,930
)
8,422
(17,272
)
23,062
Repurchases and repayments of long-term debt adjustments (d)
—
14,158
(4,884
)
(6,976
)
Fair value adjustments on debt (e)
170
12,250
8,521
44,950
Sales of finance receivables held for sale originated as held for investment adjustments (f)
(361,439
)
—
(536,420
)
—
Amortization of other intangible assets (g)
1,073
1,228
3,294
3,946
Other (h)
13,802
1,276
14,872
4,685
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes - historical accounting basis
$
348,985
$
(72,474
)
$
422,302
$
57,325
(a)
Interest income adjustments consist of: (1) the accretion of the net discount applied to non-credit impaired net finance receivables to revalue the non-credit impaired net finance receivables to their fair value at the date of the Fortress Acquisition using the interest method over the remaining life of the related net finance receivables; (2) the difference in finance charges earned on our pools of purchased credit impaired net finance receivables under a level rate of return over the expected lives of the underlying pools of purchased credit impaired finance receivables, net of the finance charges earned on these finance receivables under historical accounting basis; and (3) the elimination of the accretion or amortization of historical unearned points and fees, deferred origination costs, premiums, and discounts.
68
Table of Contents
Components of interest income adjustments consisted of:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Accretion of net discount applied to non-credit impaired net finance receivables
$
(13,065
)
$
(40,667
)
$
(65,454
)
$
(122,547
)
Purchased credit impaired finance receivables finance charges
(4,653
)
(14,619
)
(29,143
)
(43,137
)
Elimination of accretion or amortization of historical unearned points and fees, deferred origination costs, premiums, and discounts
651
3,651
6,303
12,010
Total
$
(17,067
)
$
(51,635
)
$
(88,294
)
$
(153,674
)
(b)
Interest expense adjustments consist of: (1) the accretion of the net discount applied to long-term debt to revalue the debt securities to their fair value at the date of the Fortress Acquisition using the interest method over the remaining life of the related debt securities; and (2) the elimination of the accretion or amortization of historical discounts, premiums, commissions, and fees.
Components of interest expense adjustments were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Accretion of net discount applied to long-term debt
$
37,690
$
43,219
$
111,078
$
138,752
Elimination of accretion or amortization of historical discounts, premiums, commissions, and fees
(1,331
)
(9,743
)
(11,192
)
(35,775
)
Total
$
36,359
$
33,476
$
99,886
$
102,977
(c)
Provision for finance receivable losses consists of the allowance for finance receivable losses adjustments and net charge-offs quantified in the table below. Allowance for finance receivable losses adjustments reflect the net difference between our allowance adjustment requirements calculated under our historical accounting basis net of adjustments required under push-down accounting basis. Net charge-offs reflect the net charge-off of loans at a higher carrying value under historical accounting basis versus the discounted basis to their fair value at date of the Fortress Acquisition under push-down accounting basis.
Components of provision for finance receivable losses adjustments were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Allowance for finance receivable losses adjustments
$
(13,596
)
$
22,520
$
9,616
$
72,348
Net charge-offs
(6,334
)
(14,098
)
(26,888
)
(49,286
)
Total
$
(19,930
)
$
8,422
$
(17,272
)
$
23,062
(d)
Repurchases and repayments of long-term debt adjustments reflect the impact on acceleration of the accretion of the net discount or amortization of the net premium applied to long-term debt.
(e)
Fair value adjustments on debt reflect differences between historical accounting basis and push-down accounting basis. On a historical accounting basis, certain long-term debt components are marked-to-market on a recurring basis and are no longer marked-to-market on a recurring basis after the application of push-down accounting at the time of the Fortress Acquisition.
(f)
Fair value adjustments on sales of finance receivables held for sale originated as held for investment reflect the reversal of the remaining unaccreted push-down accounting basis for net finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses established at the date of the Fortress Acquisition that were sold in the 2014 period.
(g)
Amortization of other intangible assets reflects the amortization over the remaining estimated life of intangible assets established at the date of the Fortress Acquisition as a result of the application of push-down accounting.
69
Table of Contents
(h)
“Other” items reflect differences between historical accounting basis and push-down accounting basis relating to various items such as the elimination of deferred charges, adjustments to the basis of other real estate assets, fair value adjustments to fixed assets, adjustments to insurance claims and policyholder liabilities, and various other differences all as of the date of the Fortress Acquisition.
At
September 30, 2014
, the remaining unaccreted push-down accounting basis totaled $5.3 million for net finance receivables, less allowance for finance receivable losses, and $616.1 million for long-term debt.
Segment Results
See Note 16 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our segments. Management considers Consumer, Insurance, and Acquisitions and Servicing as our Core Consumer Operations and Real Estate as our Non-Core Portfolio. Due to the nature of the Fortress Acquisition, we applied push-down accounting. However, we report the operating results of our Core Consumer Operations, Non-Core Portfolio, and Other using the same accounting basis that we employed prior to the Fortress Acquisition, which we refer to as “historical accounting basis,” to provide a consistent basis for both management and other interested third parties to better understand the operating results of these segments. The historical accounting basis (which is a basis of accounting other than U.S. GAAP) also provides better comparability of the operating results of these segments to our competitors and other companies in the financial services industry. The historical accounting basis is not applicable to the Acquisitions and Servicing segment since this segment was added effective April 1, 2013 as a result of our co-investment in the SpringCastle Portfolio and therefore, was not affected by the Fortress Acquisition. See Note 16 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for reconciliations of segment totals to condensed consolidated financial statement amounts.
We allocate revenues and expenses (on a historical accounting basis) to each segment using the following methodologies:
Interest income
Directly correlated with a specific segment.
Interest expense
Disaggregated into three categories based on the underlying debt that the expense pertains to:
l
securitizations
— allocated to the segments whose finance receivables serve as the collateral securing each of the respective debt instruments;
l
unsecured debt
— allocated to the segments based on expected leverage for that segment or the balance of unencumbered assets and cash proceeds from sale of receivables in that segment; and
l
secured term loan
— allocated to the segments whose finance receivables served as the collateral securing each of the respective debt instruments.
Provision for finance receivable losses
Directly correlated with a specific segment except for allocations to “other,” which are based on the remaining delinquent accounts as a percentage of total delinquent accounts.
Insurance revenues
Directly correlated with a specific segment.
Investment revenues
Directly correlated with a specific segment.
Net gain (loss) on repurchases and repayments of debt
Allocated to the segments based on the interest expense allocation of debt.
Net gain (loss) on fair value adjustments on debt
Directly correlated with a specific segment.
Other revenues — other
Directly correlated with a specific segment except for gains and losses on foreign currency exchange and derivatives. These items are allocated to the segments based on the interest expense allocation of debt.
Salaries and benefits
Directly correlated with a specific segment. Other salaries and benefits not directly correlated with a specific segment are allocated to each of the segments based on services provided.
Other operating expenses
Directly correlated with a specific segment. Other operating expenses not directly correlated with a specific segment are allocated to each of the segments based on services provided.
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
Directly correlated with a specific segment.
70
Table of Contents
We evaluate the performance of each of our segments based on its pretax operating earnings.
CORE CONSUMER OPERATIONS
Pretax operating results for Consumer and Insurance (which are reported on a historical accounting basis), and Acquisitions and Servicing are presented in the table below on an aggregate basis:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Interest income
$
367,171
$
351,519
$
1,080,233
$
850,976
Interest expense
58,151
60,659
180,083
158,119
Net interest income
309,020
290,860
900,150
692,857
Provision for finance receivable losses
84,419
98,836
270,919
130,647
Net interest income after provision for finance receivable losses
224,601
192,024
629,231
562,210
Other revenues:
Insurance
43,997
38,266
125,075
107,114
Investment
13,723
8,314
35,652
31,792
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt
—
(2,890
)
(1,429
)
(4,390
)
Net gain (loss) on fair value adjustments on debt
1,522
6,619
(14,810
)
6,619
Other
19,097
13,169
59,543
20,794
Total other revenues
78,339
63,478
204,031
161,929
Other expenses:
Operating expenses:
Salaries and benefits
75,643
70,805
234,891
201,918
Other operating expenses
69,811
64,589
192,450
151,171
Insurance loss and loss adjustment expenses
20,451
16,849
57,923
48,373
Total other expenses
165,905
152,243
485,264
401,462
Pretax operating income
137,035
103,259
347,998
322,677
Pretax operating income attributable to non-controlling interests
34,945
31,643
81,542
86,383
Pretax operating income attributable to Springleaf
$
102,090
$
71,616
$
266,456
$
236,294
71
Table of Contents
Selected financial statistics for Consumer (which are reported on a historical accounting basis) and Acquisitions and Servicing were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
At or for the Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
At or for the Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Consumer
Net finance receivables
$
3,578,019
$
2,968,211
Number of accounts
894,182
797,406
Average net receivables
$
3,480,581
$
2,897,354
$
3,295,101
$
2,705,438
Yield
27.02
%
25.92
%
27.00
%
25.65
%
Gross charge-off ratio (a)
5.46
%
4.29
%
5.60
%
5.06
%
Recovery ratio (b)
(0.78
)%
(0.26
)%
(0.67
)%
(2.16
)%
Charge-off ratio (a) (b)
4.68
%
4.03
%
4.93
%
2.90
%
Delinquency ratio
2.55
%
2.32
%
Origination volume
$
924,317
$
767,097
$
2,594,645
$
2,326,961
Number of accounts
193,288
192,225
566,032
563,531
Acquisitions and Servicing
Net finance receivables
$
2,083,145
$
2,654,238
Number of accounts
291,153
363,912
Average net receivables
$
2,141,884
$
2,734,454
$
2,279,237
$
2,808,221
Yield
24.26
%
23.64
%
24.28
%
23.53
%
Net charge-off ratio
5.31
%
8.58
%
7.09
%
5.48
%
Delinquency ratio
5.11
%
7.45
%
(a)
The gross charge-off ratio and charge-off ratio for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
reflect $14.5 million of additional charge-offs recorded in March 2013 (on a historical accounting basis) related to our change in charge-off policy for personal loans effective March 31, 2013. Excluding these additional charge-offs, our Consumer gross charge-off ratio would have been 4.34% for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
.
(b)
The recovery ratio and charge-off ratio for the three and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
reflect $23.8 million of recoveries on charged-off core personal loans resulting from a sale of previously charged-off finance receivables in June 2013, net of a $1.6 million adjustment recorded in September 2013 for the subsequent buyback of certain personal loans. Excluding these recoveries, our Consumer charge-off ratio would have been 3.81% and 4.09%, respectively, for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2013
. Excluding the impacts of the $14.5 million of additional charge-offs and the $23.8 million of recoveries on charged-off core personal loans, our Consumer charge-off ratio would have been 3.36% for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
.
72
Table of Contents
Comparison of Pretax Operating Results for Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Interest income:
Finance charges - Consumer
$
236,190
$
188,601
Finance charges - Acquisitions and Servicing
130,981
162,918
Total
$
367,171
$
351,519
Finance charges — Consumer
increased
$47.6 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to increases in average net receivables and yield. Average net receivables increased for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to increased originations on personal loans resulting from our continued focus on personal loans. Yield increased for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to pricing of new personal loans at higher state specific rates with concentrations in states with more favorable returns.
Finance charges — Acquisitions and Servicing
decreased
$31.9 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to lower average net receivables due to the liquidating status of the SpringCastle Portfolio, partially offset by higher yields on the finance receivables remaining in the portfolio.
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Interest expense - Consumer
$
40,466
$
38,241
Interest expense - Acquisitions and Servicing
17,685
22,418
Total
$
58,151
$
60,659
Interest expense — Consumer
increased
$2.2 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to additional funding required to support increased originations of personal loans. This increase was partially offset by less utilization of financing from unsecured notes that was replaced by consumer loan securitizations, which generally have lower interest rates.
Interest expense — Acquisitions and Servicing
decreased
$4.7 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to lower average debt required as a result of the liquidating status of the SpringCastle Portfolio.
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Provision for finance receivable losses - Consumer
$
56,087
$
38,174
Provision for finance receivable losses - Acquisitions and Servicing
28,332
60,662
Total
$
84,419
$
98,836
Provision for finance receivable losses — Consumer
increased
$17.9 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to additional allowance requirements reflecting increased originations of personal loans in the 2014 period and higher personal loan delinquency ratio at
September 30, 2014
.
Provision for finance receivable losses — Acquisitions and Servicing
decreased
$32.3 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to lower delinquency ratio of the SpringCastle Portfolio at
September 30, 2014
and its liquidating status.
Insurance revenues
increased
$5.7 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to increases in credit and non-credit earned premiums reflecting higher originations of personal loans in the
2014
period. The increase in credit premiums also reflects the origination of personal loans with longer terms.
73
Table of Contents
Net gain on fair value adjustments on debt — Acquisitions and Servicing of
$1.5 million
and
$6.6 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
resulted from the unrealized gain on fair value adjustments of the long-term debt associated with the securitization of the SpringCastle Portfolio that is accounted for at fair value through earnings.
Other revenues — other
increased
$5.9 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to servicing fee revenues for the fees charged by Acquisitions and Servicing for servicing the SpringCastle Portfolio. We assumed the direct servicing obligations for these loans in September 2013. These fees are eliminated in consolidated operating results with the servicing fee expenses, which are included in other operating expenses.
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Salaries and benefits - Consumer
$
64,015
$
62,318
Salaries and benefits - Insurance
4,791
4,481
Salaries and benefits - Acquisitions and Servicing
6,837
4,006
Total
$
75,643
$
70,805
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Other operating expenses - Consumer
$
44,554
$
30,421
Other operating expenses - Insurance
3,758
3,115
Other operating expenses - Acquisitions and Servicing
21,499
31,053
Total
$
69,811
$
64,589
Other operating expenses for Consumer and Insurance
increased
$14.8 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to higher advertising, professional fees, and information technology expenses.
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
increased
$3.6 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to an unfavorable variance in claim reserves.
Comparison of Pretax Operating Results for
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
(dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Interest income:
Finance charges - Consumer
$
666,281
$
519,688
Finance charges - Acquisitions and Servicing
413,952
331,288
Total
$
1,080,233
$
850,976
Finance charges — Consumer
increased
$146.6 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to increases in average net receivables and yield. Average net receivables increased for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to increased originations on personal loans resulting from our continued focus on personal loans. Yield increased for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to pricing of new personal loans at higher state specific rates with concentrations in states with more favorable returns.
Finance charges — Acquisitions and Servicing for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
were favorably impacted by an additional three months of finance charges on the SpringCastle Portfolio when compared to the same period in
2013
.
74
Table of Contents
(dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Interest expense - Consumer
$
122,097
$
111,110
Interest expense - Acquisitions and Servicing
57,986
47,009
Total
$
180,083
$
158,119
Interest expense — Consumer
increased
$11.0 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to additional funding required to support increased originations of personal loans. This increase was partially offset by less utilization of financing from unsecured notes that was replaced by consumer loan securitizations, which generally have lower interest rates.
Interest expense — Acquisitions and Servicing included an additional three months of interest expense on the long-term debt associated with the securitization of the SpringCastle Portfolio for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in 2013.
(dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Provision for finance receivable losses - Consumer
$
149,238
$
52,188
Provision for finance receivable losses - Acquisitions and Servicing
121,681
78,459
Total
$
270,919
$
130,647
Provision for finance receivable losses — Consumer
increased
$97.1 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to $23.8 million of recoveries recorded in June 2013 on previously charged-off personal loans resulting from a sale of these loans in June 2013. This increase also reflected additional allowance requirements resulting from increased originations of personal loans in the
2014
period and higher personal loan delinquency ratio at
September 30, 2014
.
Provision for finance receivable losses — Acquisitions and Servicing included an additional three months of provision for finance receivable losses on the SpringCastle Portfolio for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
.
Insurance revenues
increased
$18.0 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to increases in credit and non-credit earned premiums reflecting higher originations of personal loans in the
2014
period. The increase in credit premiums also reflects the origination of personal loans with longer terms.
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt — Consumer of $1.4 million and $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, reflected repurchases of debt at net amounts greater than carrying value.
Net loss on fair value adjustments on debt — Acquisitions and Servicing of
$14.8 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and net gain on fair value adjustments on debt — Acquisitions and Servicing of
$6.6 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
reflected net unrealized (loss) gain, respectively, on fair value adjustments of the long-term debt associated with the securitization of the SpringCastle Portfolio that is accounted for at fair value through earnings.
Other revenues — other
increased
$38.7 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to servicing fee revenues for the fees charged by Acquisitions and Servicing for servicing the SpringCastle Portfolio. We assumed the direct servicing obligations for these loans in September 2013. These fees are eliminated in consolidated operating results with the servicing fee expenses, which are included in other operating expenses.
75
Table of Contents
(dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Salaries and benefits - Consumer
$
195,778
$
184,077
Salaries and benefits - Insurance
14,501
11,424
Salaries and benefits - Acquisitions and Servicing
24,612
6,417
Total
$
234,891
$
201,918
(dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2014
2013
Other operating expenses - Consumer
$
112,668
$
87,609
Other operating expenses - Insurance
10,745
7,993
Other operating expenses - Acquisitions and Servicing
69,037
55,569
Total
$
192,450
$
151,171
Other operating expenses for Consumer and Insurance
increased
$27.8 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to higher advertising, professional fees, and information technology expenses.
Insurance losses and loss adjustment expenses
increased
$9.6 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to unfavorable variances in benefit reserves and claim reserves.
76
Table of Contents
Reconciliation of Income (Loss) before Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes on Historical Accounting Basis to Pretax Core Earnings
Pretax core earnings is a key performance measure used by management in evaluating the performance of our Core Consumer Operations. Pretax core earnings represents our income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes on a historical accounting basis and excludes results of operations from our non-core portfolio (Real Estate) and other non-originating legacy operations, gains (losses) resulting from accelerated long-term debt repayment and repurchases of long-term debt related to Consumer, gains (losses) on fair value adjustments on debt related to Core Consumer Operations (attributable to SHI), and results of operations attributable to non-controlling interests. Pretax core earnings provides us with a key measure of our Core Consumer Operations’ performance as it assists us in comparing its performance on a consistent basis. Management believes pretax core earnings is useful in assessing the profitability of our core business and uses pretax core earnings in evaluating our operating performance. Pretax core earnings is a non-GAAP measure and should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for or superior to, operating income, net income, operating cash flow, and other measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
The following is a reconciliation of income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes on a historical accounting basis to pretax core earnings:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes - historical accounting basis *
$
348,985
$
(72,474
)
$
422,302
$
57,325
Adjustments:
Pretax operating (income) loss - Non-Core Portfolio Operations
(214,441
)
41,048
(87,103
)
135,535
Pretax operating loss - Other/non- originating legacy operations
2,491
134,685
12,799
129,817
Net loss from accelerated repayment/repurchase of debt - Consumer
—
2,890
1,429
4,390
Net (gain) loss on fair value adjustments on debt - Core Consumer Operations (attributable to SHI)
(715
)
(3,111
)
6,961
(3,111
)
Pretax operating income attributable to non-controlling interests
(34,945
)
(31,643
)
(81,542
)
(86,383
)
Pretax core earnings
$
101,375
$
71,395
$
274,846
$
237,573
*
See reconciliation of income (loss) before provision for (benefit from) income taxes on a push-down accounting basis to a historical accounting basis, which is presented prior to “Segment Results”.
77
Table of Contents
NON-CORE PORTFOLIO
Pretax operating results for Real Estate (which are reported on a historical accounting basis) were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Interest income:
Finance charges
$
53,568
$
170,772
$
338,121
$
535,280
Finance receivables held for sale originated as held for investment
41,468
—
48,598
—
Total interest income
95,036
170,772
386,719
535,280
Interest expense
83,795
131,699
291,084
427,608
Net interest income
11,241
39,073
95,635
107,672
Provision for finance receivable losses
37,192
52,645
118,992
188,737
Net interest loss after provision for finance receivable losses
(25,951
)
(13,572
)
(23,357
)
(81,065
)
Other revenues:
Investment
(954
)
—
(954
)
—
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt
—
(15,818
)
(10,023
)
(35,418
)
Net gain on fair value adjustments on debt
—
12,217
8,298
45,428
Net gain on sales of real estate loans and related trust assets *
279,889
—
194,894
—
Other
(2,373
)
(2,011
)
(3,580
)
(1,551
)
Total other revenues
276,562
(5,612
)
188,635
8,459
Other expenses:
Operating expenses:
Salaries and benefits
17,186
7,551
34,559
20,648
Other operating expenses
18,984
14,313
43,616
42,281
Total other expenses
36,170
21,864
78,175
62,929
Pretax operating income (loss)
$
214,441
$
(41,048
)
$
87,103
$
(135,535
)
*
Consistent with our segment reporting presentation in Note 16 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we have combined the lower of cost or fair value adjustments recorded on the dates the real estate loans were transferred to finance receivables held for sale with the final gain (loss) on the sales of these loans.
78
Table of Contents
Selected financial statistics for Real Estate (which are reported on a historical accounting basis) were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
At or for the Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
At or for the Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Real estate
Finance receivables held for investment:
Net finance receivables
$
702,456
$
9,617,781
Number of accounts
100,655
123,145
TDR finance receivables
$
160,288
$
3,172,955
Allowance for finance receivables losses - TDR
$
56,073
$
730,875
Provision for finance receivable losses - TDR
$
8,489
$
37,711
$
74,717
$
141,621
Average net receivables
$
2,908,601
$
9,767,360
$
6,612,761
$
10,086,099
Yield
7.31
%
6.94
%
6.84
%
7.10
%
Loss ratio (a) (b)
2.99
%
2.10
%
1.94
%
2.14
%
Delinquency ratio
7.31
%
7.74
%
Finance receivables held for sale:
Net finance receivables
$
493,880
$
—
Number of accounts
7,427
—
TDR finance receivables
$
486,100
$
—
(a)
The loss ratio for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
reflects $2.2 million of recoveries on charged-off real estate loans resulting from a sale of previously charged-off real estate loans in March 2014, net of a $0.2 million reserve for subsequent buybacks. Excluding these recoveries, our Real Estate loss ratio would have been 1.99% for the
nine
months ended September 2014.
(b)
The loss ratio for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
reflects $9.9 million of recoveries on charged-off real estate loans resulting from a sale of previously charged-off finance receivables in June 2013. Excluding these recoveries, our Real Estate loss ratio would have been 2.27% for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
.
Comparison of Pretax Operating Results for Three Months Ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
Finance charges
decreased
$117.2 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to decreases in average net receivables and yield. Average net receivables decreased for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in 2013 primarily due to the continued liquidation of the real estate portfolio, including the transfers of real estate loans with a total carrying value of $7.2 billion to finance receivables held for sale and the subsequent sales of nearly all of these real estate loans during the first
nine
months of
2014
. The increase in yield for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
reflected a higher proportion of our remaining real estate loans that are secured by second mortgages, which generally have higher yields.
Interest expense
decreased
$47.9 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to lower securitization interest expense as a result of the sales of the Company’s beneficial interests in the mortgage-backed retained certificates related to its previous mortgage securitization transactions. This decrease also reflected lower unsecured debt interest expense allocated to Real Estate.
79
Table of Contents
Provision for finance receivable losses
decreased
$15.5 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
. The decrease in provision for finance receivable losses reflected a reduction in the allowance requirements recorded for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
as a result of the transfers of real estate loans with a total carrying value of $7.2 billion to finance receivables held for sale and the subsequent sales of nearly all of these real estate loans during the first
nine
months of
2014
. This decrease also reflected lower real estate loan delinquency ratio at
September 30, 2014
.
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt of $15.8 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2013
reflected acceleration of amortization of deferred costs and repurchases of debt at net amounts greater than carrying value.
Net gain on fair value adjustments on debt of
$12.2 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2013
reflected differences between historical accounting basis and push-down accounting basis. On a historical accounting basis, certain long-term debt components are marked-to-market on a recurring basis and are no longer marked-to-market on a recurring basis after the application of push-down accounting at the time of the Fortress Acquisition.
Net gain on sales of real estate loans and related trust assets of
$279.9 million
for the three months ended
September 30, 2014
primarily reflected cash bids of amounts greater than the equity basis of the real estate loans at the date of sale. The net gain also included proceeds of
$38.8 million
from the related MSR Sale.
Comparison of Pretax Operating Results for
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
Finance charges
decreased
$197.2 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to decreases in average net receivables and yield. Average net receivables decreased for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to the continued liquidation of the real estate portfolio, including the transfers of real estate loans with a total carrying value of $7.2 billion to finance receivables held for sale and the subsequent sales of nearly all of these real estate loans during the first
nine
months of 2014. The decrease in yield for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
reflected a higher proportion of TDR finance receivables, which generally have lower rates than non-modified real estate loans. The higher proportion of TDR finance receivables resulted from the transfers of a substantial portion of performing real estate loans to finance receivables held for sale during the first
nine
months of
2014
.
Interest expense
decreased
$136.5 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to lower secured term loan interest expense allocated to Real Estate and lower securitization interest expense as a result of the sales of the Company’s beneficial interests in the mortgage-backed retained certificates related to its previous mortgage securitization transactions.
Provision for finance receivable losses
decreased
$69.7 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
. The decrease in provision for finance receivable losses reflected a reduction in the allowance requirements recorded for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
as a result of the transfers of real estate loans with a total carrying value of $7.2 billion to finance receivables held for sale and the subsequent sales of nearly all of these real estate loans during the first nine months of
2014
. This decrease also reflected lower real estate loan delinquency ratio at
September 30, 2014
and was partially offset by $9.9 million of recoveries recorded in June 2013 on previously charged-off real estate loans resulting from a sale of these loans in June 2013.
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt of
$10.0 million
and
$35.4 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively, reflected acceleration of amortization of deferred costs and repurchases of debt at net amounts greater than carrying value.
Net gain on fair value adjustments on debt of
$8.3 million
and
$45.4 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
and
2013
, respectively, reflected differences between historical accounting basis and push-down accounting basis. On a historical accounting basis, certain long-term debt components are marked-to-market on a recurring basis and are no longer marked-to-market on a recurring basis after the application of push-down accounting at the time of the Fortress Acquisition.
Net gain on sales of real estate loans and related trust assets of
$194.9 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
primarily reflected cash bids of amounts greater than the equity basis of the real estate loans at the date of sale. The net gain also included proceeds of
$38.8 million
from the related MSR Sale. The net gain was partially offset by the lower of cost or fair value adjustments recorded on the dates the real estate loans were transferred to finance receivables held for sale. Consistent with our segment reporting presentation, we have combined the lower of cost or fair value adjustments with the final gain (loss) on the sales of these loans.
80
Table of Contents
OTHER
“Other” consists of our other non-originating legacy operations, which are isolated by geographic market and/or distribution channel from our prospective Core Consumer Operations and our Non-Core Portfolio. These operations include our legacy operations in 14 states where we have also ceased branch-based personal lending as a result of our restructuring activities during the first half of 2012, our liquidating retail sales finance portfolio (including our retail sales finance accounts from our dedicated auto finance operation), our lending operations in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the operations of our United Kingdom subsidiary. Effective June 1, 2014, we also report (on a prospective basis) certain real estate loans with equity capacity in Other. These short equity loans, which have liquidated down to an immaterial level, were previously included in our Core Consumer Operations. At June 1, 2014, the transfer date, the carrying value of these loans totaled $16.3 million.
Pretax operating results of the Other components (which are reported on a historical accounting basis) were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Interest income
$
3,850
$
10,000
$
13,265
$
37,631
Interest expense
1,837
3,323
5,810
12,164
Net interest income
2,013
6,677
7,455
25,467
Provision for finance receivable losses
1,290
2,361
6,557
(3,385
)
Net interest income after provision for finance receivable losses
723
4,316
898
28,852
Other revenues:
Insurance
14
18
46
58
Investment
45
(1
)
69
1,396
Net loss on repurchases and repayments of debt
—
(706
)
(47
)
(977
)
Other
7
(25
)
608
(178
)
Total other revenues
66
(714
)
676
299
Other expenses:
Operating expenses:
Salaries and benefits
1,915
136,249
9,183
149,436
Other operating expenses
1,365
2,038
5,190
9,532
Total other expenses
3,280
138,287
14,373
158,968
Pretax operating loss
$
(2,491
)
$
(134,685
)
$
(12,799
)
$
(129,817
)
Net finance receivables of the Other components (which are reported on a historical accounting basis) were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
September 30,
2014
2013
Net finance receivables:
Personal loans
$
34,152
$
67,616
Real estate loans
6,672
7,748
Retail sales finance
59,478
122,797
Total
$
100,302
$
198,161
81
Table of Contents
Credit Quality
Our customers encompass a wide range of borrowers. In the consumer finance industry, they are described as prime or near-prime at one extreme and non-prime or sub-prime (less creditworthy) at the other. Our customers’ incomes are generally near the national median but our customers may vary from national norms as to their debt-to-income ratios, employment and residency stability, and/or credit repayment histories. In general, our customers have lower credit quality and require significant levels of servicing.
As a result of the Fortress Acquisition, we applied push-down accounting and adjusted the carrying value of our finance receivables (the “FA Loans”) to their fair value on November 30, 2010. For purchased finance receivables, such as the SpringCastle Portfolio (“SCP Loans”), we also record these loans at fair value on the day of purchase.
Carrying value of finance receivables includes accrued finance charges, unamortized deferred origination costs and unamortized net premiums and discounts on purchased finance receivables. We record an allowance for loan losses to cover expected losses on our finance receivables.
For both the FA Loans and SCP Loans, we segregate between those considered to be performing (“FA Performing Loans” and “SCP Performing Loans,” respectively) and those for which it was determined it was probable that we would be unable to collect all contractually required payments (“FA Credit Impaired Loans” and “SCP Credit Impaired Loans,” respectively). For the FA Performing Loans and the SCP Performing Loans, we accrete the purchase discount to contractual cash flows over the remaining life of the loan to finance charges. For the FA Credit Impaired Loans and SCP Credit Impaired Loans, we record the expected credit loss at purchase and recognize finance charges on the expected effective yield.
82
Table of Contents
FINANCE RECEIVABLES
Net finance receivables by originated before and after the Fortress Acquisition and the related allowance for finance receivable losses were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
Personal Loans
FA Performing Loans at Fortress Acquisition
$
119,389
$
168,386
Originated after Fortress Acquisition
3,487,820
3,003,318
Allowance for finance receivable losses
(124,489
)
(94,880
)
Personal loans, less allowance for finance receivable losses
3,482,720
3,076,824
SpringCastle Portfolio
SCP Performing Loans
1,712,178
1,975,023
SCP Credit Impaired Loans
370,967
530,326
Allowance for finance receivable losses
(319
)
(1,056
)
SpringCastle Portfolio, less allowance for finance receivable losses
2,082,826
2,504,293
Real Estate Loans
FA Performing Loans at Fortress Acquisition
612,224
6,597,300
FA Credit Impaired Loans
30,697
1,314,381
Originated after Fortress Acquisition*
12,378
70,668
Allowance for finance receivable losses
(37,634
)
(235,549
)
Real estate loans, less allowance for finance receivable losses
617,665
7,746,800
Retail Sales Finance
FA Performing Loans at Fortress Acquisition
37,489
63,158
Originated after Fortress Acquisition
19,411
35,753
Allowance for finance receivable losses
(1,194
)
(1,840
)
Retail sales finance, less allowance for finance receivable losses
55,706
97,071
Total net finance receivables, less allowance
$
6,238,917
$
13,424,988
Allowance for finance receivable losses as a percentage of finance receivables
Personal loans
3.45
%
2.99
%
SpringCastle Portfolio
0.02
%
0.04
%
Real estate loans
5.74
%
2.95
%
Retail sales finance
2.10
%
1.86
%
*
Real estate loan originations in
2014
and
2013
were from advances on home equity lines of credit.
We consider the delinquency status of the finance receivable as our primary credit quality indicator. We monitor delinquency trends to manage our exposure to credit risk. We consider finance receivables 60 days or more past due as delinquent and consider the likelihood of collection to decrease at such time.
83
Table of Contents
The following is a summary of net finance receivables by type and by days delinquent:
(dollars in thousands)
Personal
Loans
SpringCastle
Portfolio
Real
Estate Loans
Retail
Sales Finance
Total
September 30, 2014
Net finance receivables:
60-89 days past due
$
32,384
$
33,379
$
13,151
$
770
$
79,684
90-119 days past due
25,688
20,955
7,842
429
54,914
120-149 days past due
21,132
15,826
5,629
558
43,145
150-179 days past due
16,727
13,102
5,557
303
35,689
180 days or more past due
1,088
4,946
11,947
46
18,027
Total delinquent finance receivables
97,019
88,208
44,126
2,106
231,459
Current
3,456,829
1,932,945
588,796
53,522
6,032,092
30-59 days past due
53,361
61,992
22,377
1,272
139,002
Total
$
3,607,209
$
2,083,145
$
655,299
$
56,900
$
6,402,553
December 31, 2013
Net finance receivables:
60-89 days past due
$
28,504
$
60,669
$
97,567
$
1,290
$
188,030
90-119 days past due
22,804
47,689
68,190
1,017
139,700
120-149 days past due
18,780
33,671
55,222
757
108,430
150-179 days past due
14,689
26,828
45,158
740
87,415
180 days or more past due
938
3,579
356,766
173
361,456
Total delinquent finance receivables
85,715
172,436
622,903
3,977
885,031
Current
3,038,307
2,232,965
7,183,437
92,093
12,546,802
30-59 days past due
47,682
99,948
176,009
2,841
326,480
Total
$
3,171,704
$
2,505,349
$
7,982,349
$
98,911
$
13,758,313
TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURING
We make modifications to our real estate loans to assist borrowers in avoiding foreclosure. When we modify a real estate loan’s contractual terms for economic or other reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties and grant a concession that we would not otherwise consider, we classify that loan as a TDR finance receivable.
Information regarding TDR finance receivables held for investment and held for sale were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
September 30,
2014
December 31,
2013
TDR net finance receivables (a)
$
335,512
$
1,380,223
Allowance for TDR finance receivable losses
$
31,205
$
176,455
Allowance as a percentage of TDR net finance receivables (b)
30.04
%
12.78
%
Number of TDR accounts
5,077
14,609
(a)
TDR net finance receivables at
September 30, 2014
includes
$231.6 million
of TDR finance receivables held for sale.
(b)
Allowance ratio at
September 30, 2014
reflects the higher proportion of real estate loans secured by second mortgages as a result of the real estate loan sales during the first nine months of 2014.
84
Table of Contents
Net finance receivables held for investment and held for sale that were modified as TDR finance receivables within the previous 12 months and for which there was a default during the period to cause the TDR finance receivables to be considered nonperforming (90 days or more past due) were as follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Real Estate Loans
Number of TDR accounts (a)
54
370
488
797
TDR net finance receivables (a) (b)
$
2,788
$
25,848
$
31,465
$
59,809
(a)
Number and amount of TDR net finance receivables for the
three and nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
that defaulted during the previous 12 month period include
30
TDR accounts that were held for sale totaling
$1.8 million
.
(b)
Represents the corresponding balance of TDR net finance receivables at the end of the month in which they defaulted.
We may make modifications to loans in our newly acquired SpringCastle Portfolio to assist borrowers in avoiding default and to mitigate the risk of loss. When we modify a loan’s contractual terms for economic or other reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties and grant a concession that we would not otherwise consider, we classify that loan as a TDR finance receivable. We restructure finance receivables only if we believe the customer has the ability to pay under the restructured terms for the foreseeable future. There were no SpringCastle Portfolio TDR accounts as of the April 1, 2013 acquisition date as any account deemed as a TDR under our policy was categorized as a purchased credit impaired finance receivables. The amount of SpringCastle Portfolio loans that has been classified as a TDR finance receivable subsequent to the acquisition date is $0.2 million and has not yet reached a significant level for detailed disclosure.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have historically financed the majority of our operating liquidity and capital needs through a combination of cash flows from operations, securitization debt, unsecured debt, and borrowings under our secured term loan. In the future, we plan to finance our operating liquidity and capital needs through a combination of cash flows from operations, securitization debt, unsecured debt, other corporate debt facilities, and equity.
As a holding company, all of the funds generated from our operations are earned by our operating subsidiaries. Our operating subsidiaries’ primary cash needs relate to funding our lending activities, our debt service obligations, our operating expenses and, to a lesser extent, expenditures relating to upgrading and monitoring our technology platform, risk systems, and branch locations.
Our insurance subsidiaries maintain reserves as liabilities on the balance sheet to cover future claims for certain insurance products. Claims reserves totaled $71.0 million as of
September 30, 2014
.
At
September 30, 2014
, we had
$2.0 billion
of cash and cash equivalents, and during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
, SHI generated net income of
$551.5 million
. Our net cash inflow from operating and investing activities totaled
$3.1 billion
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
. At
September 30, 2014
, our remaining scheduled principal and interest payments for 2014 on our existing debt (excluding securitizations) totaled $483.8 million. As of
September 30, 2014
, we had $1.9 billion UPB of unencumbered personal loans and $713.2 million UPB of unencumbered real estate loans.
Based on our estimates and taking into account the risks and uncertainties of our plans, we believe that we will have adequate liquidity to finance and operate our businesses and repay our obligations as they become due for at least the next twelve months.
To reduce the risk associated with unfavorable changes in interest rates on our debt not offset by favorable changes in yield of our finance receivables, we monitor the anticipated cash flows of our assets and liabilities, principally our finance receivables and debt. We have funded finance receivables with a combination of fixed-rate and floating-rate debt and equity and have based the mix of fixed-rate and floating-rate debt issuances, in part, on the nature of the finance receivables being supported. On a historical accounting basis, our floating-rate debt represented 1% of our borrowings at
September 30, 2014
and 8% at
December 31, 2013
.
85
Table of Contents
LIQUIDITY
Operating Activities
Cash from operations
decreased
$158.2 million
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
when compared to the same period in
2013
primarily due to one-time costs relating to the real estate sales transactions, partially offset by higher net interest income.
Investing Activities
Net cash provided by investing activities of
$2.8 billion
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
was primarily due to the sales of finance receivables held for sale originated as held for investment during the first
nine
months of
2014
. Net cash used for investing activities of
$2.3 billion
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
reflected the purchase of the SpringCastle Portfolio on April 1, 2013.
Financing Activities
Net cash used for financing activities of
$1.6 billion
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
was primarily due to the repayments of the secured term loan and the 2013-BAC trust notes in late March
2014
. Net cash provided by financing activities of
$1.5 billion
for the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2013
was primarily due to the issuance of long-term debt associated with the securitization of the SpringCastle Portfolio in April
2013
.
Liquidity Risks and Strategies
SFC’s credit ratings are non-investment grade, which have a significant impact on our cost of, and access to, capital. This, in turn, can negatively affect our ability to manage our liquidity and our ability or cost to refinance our indebtedness.
There are numerous risks to our financial results, liquidity, capital raising, and debt refinancing plans, some of which may not be quantified in our current liquidity forecasts. These risks include, but are not limited, to the following:
•
our inability to grow or maintain our personal loan portfolio with adequate profitability;
•
the effect of federal, state and local laws, regulations, or regulatory policies and practices;
•
the liquidation and related losses within our remaining real estate portfolio could result in reduced cash receipts;
•
potential liability relating to real estate and personal loans which we have sold or may sell in the future, or relating to securitized loans; and
•
the potential for disruptions in the debt and equity markets.
The principal factors that could decrease our liquidity are customer delinquencies and defaults, a decline in customer prepayments, and a prolonged inability to adequately access capital market funding. We intend to support our liquidity position by utilizing the following strategies:
•
maintaining disciplined underwriting standards and pricing for loans we originate or purchase and managing purchases of finance receivables;
•
pursuing additional debt financings (including new securitizations and new unsecured debt issuances, debt refinancing transactions and standby funding facilities), or a combination of the foregoing;
•
purchasing portions of our outstanding indebtedness through open market or privately negotiated transactions with third parties or pursuant to one or more tender or exchange offers or otherwise, upon such terms and at such prices, as well as with such consideration, as we may determine; and
•
obtaining secured revolving credit facilities to allow us to use excess cash to pay down higher cost debt.
However, it is possible that the actual outcome of one or more of our plans could be materially different than expected or that one or more of our significant judgments or estimates could prove to be materially incorrect.
OUR INSURANCE SUBSIDIARIES
State law restricts the amounts our insurance subsidiaries, Merit and Yosemite, may pay as dividends without prior notice to, or in some cases approval from, the Indiana Department of Insurance. The maximum amount of dividends that can be paid without prior approval in a 12 month period, measured retrospectively from the date of payment, is the greater of 10% of policyholders’ surplus as of the prior year-end, or the net gain from operations as of the prior year-end. On October 20, 2014,
86
Table of Contents
Merit paid an ordinary dividend of $18.0 million to SFC that did not require prior approval, and Yosemite paid an extraordinary dividend of $57.0 million to SFC upon receiving prior approval. During the third quarter of 2013, our insurance subsidiaries paid $150.0 million of extraordinary dividends to SFC upon receiving prior approvals. In addition, effective July 31, 2013, Yosemite paid, as an extraordinary dividend to SFC, 100% of the common stock of its wholly owned subsidiary, CommoLoCo, Inc., in the amount of $57.8 million, upon receiving prior approval.
OUR DEBT AGREEMENTS
On December 30, 2013, SHI entered into Guaranty Agreements whereby it agreed to fully and unconditionally guarantee the payments of principal, premium (if any), and interest on approximately
$5.2 billion
aggregate principal amount of senior notes on a senior basis and
$350.0 million
aggregate principal amount of a junior subordinated debenture (collectively, the “notes”) on a junior subordinated basis issued by SFC. The notes consist of the following:
8.250%
Senior Notes due 2023;
7.750%
Senior Notes due 2021;
6.00%
Senior Notes due 2020; a
60
-year junior subordinated debenture; and all senior notes outstanding on December 30, 2013, issued pursuant to the Indenture dated as of May 1, 1999 (the “1999 Indenture”), between SFC and Wilmington Trust, National Association (the successor trustee to Citibank N.A.). As of December 30, 2013, approximately
$3.9 billion
aggregate principal amount of senior notes were outstanding under the 1999 Indenture. The
60
-year junior subordinated debenture underlies the trust preferred securities sold by a trust sponsored by SFC. On December 30, 2013, SHI entered into a Trust Guaranty Agreement whereby it agreed to fully and unconditionally guarantee the related payment obligations under the trust preferred securities. As of
September 30, 2014
, approximately
$5.1 billion
aggregate principal amount of senior notes, including
$3.9 billion
aggregate principal amount of senior notes under the 1999 Indenture, and
$350.0 million
aggregate principal amount of a junior subordinated debenture were outstanding.
The debt agreements to which SFC and its subsidiaries are a party include customary terms and conditions, including covenants and representations and warranties. Some or all of these agreements also contain certain restrictions, including restrictions on the ability to create senior liens on property and assets in connection with any new debt financings and SFC’s ability to sell or convey all or substantially all of its assets, unless the transferee assumes SFC’s obligations under the applicable debt agreement.
With the exception of SFC’s junior subordinated debenture and one consumer loan securitization, none of our debt agreements require SFC or any of its subsidiaries to meet or maintain any specific financial targets or ratios.
Under our debt agreements, certain events, including non-payment of principal or interest, bankruptcy or insolvency, or a breach of a covenant or a representation or warranty may constitute an event of default and trigger an acceleration of payments. In some cases, an event of default or acceleration of payments under one debt agreement may constitute a cross-default under other debt agreements resulting in an acceleration of payments under the other agreements.
As of
September 30, 2014
, we were in compliance with all of the covenants under our debt agreements.
Junior Subordinated Debenture
In January 2007, SFC issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 60-year junior subordinated debenture (the “debenture”) under an indenture dated January 22, 2007 (the “Junior Subordinated Indenture”), by and between SFC and Deutsche Bank Trust Company, as trustee. The debenture underlies the trust preferred securities sold by a trust sponsored by SFC. SFC can redeem the debenture at par beginning in January 2017.
Pursuant to the terms of the debenture, SFC, upon the occurrence of a mandatory trigger event, is required to defer interest payments to the holders of the debenture (and not make dividend payments to SFI) unless SFC obtains non-debt capital funding in an amount equal to all accrued and unpaid interest on the debenture otherwise payable on the next interest payment date and pays such amount to the holders of the debenture. A mandatory trigger event occurs if SFC’s (1) tangible equity to tangible managed assets is less than 5.5% or (2) average fixed charge ratio is not more than 1.10x for the trailing four quarters (where the fixed charge ratio equals earnings excluding income taxes, interest expense, extraordinary items, goodwill impairment, and any amounts related to discontinued operations, divided by the sum of interest expense and any preferred dividends).
Based upon SFC’s financial results for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2014
, a mandatory trigger event did not occur with respect to the payment due in January 2015 as the tangible equity to tangible managed assets was 22.4% and the average fixed charge ratio was 1.11x.
87
Table of Contents
Consumer Loan Securitization
In connection with the Sumner Brook 2013-VFN1 securitization, SFC is required to maintain an available cash covenant and a consolidated tangible net worth covenant. At
September 30, 2014
, SFC is in compliance with these covenants.
Structured Financings
We execute private securitizations under Rule 144A of the Securities Act. As of
September 30, 2014
, our structured financings consisted of the following:
(dollars in thousands)
Initial Note
Amounts
Issued (a)
Initial
Collateral
Balance (b)
Current
Note
Amounts
Outstanding
Current
Collateral
Balance (b)
Current
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate
Collateral
Type
Revolving
Period
Consumer Securitizations
SLFMT 2013-A
$
567,880
$
662,247
$
567,880
$
662,261
2.75
%
Personal loans
2 years
SLFMT 2013-B
370,170
441,989
370,170
442,003
3.99
%
Personal loans
3 years
SLFMT 2014-A
559,260
644,331
559,260
644,344
2.55
%
Personal loans
2 years
Total consumer securitizations
1,497,310
1,748,567
1,497,310
1,748,608
SpringCastle Securitization
SCFT 2013-A
2,572,000
3,934,955
1,458,278
2,875,348
3.80
%
Personal and junior mortgage loans
N/A
Total secured structured financings
$
4,069,310
$
5,683,522
$
2,955,588
$
4,623,956
(a)
Represents securities sold at time of issuance or at a later date and does not include retained notes.
(b)
Represents UPB of the collateral supporting the issued and retained notes.
In addition to the structured financings included in the table above, we completed one conduit securitization in
2014
and three conduit securitizations in
2013
. At
September 30, 2014
, we had drawn $100 million under these facilities. Also, on October 3, 2014, the Co-Issuers repaid the SpringCastle 2013-A Notes using the proceeds from the sale of the SpringCastle 2014-A Notes. See Note 20 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on this subsequent event.
Our
2013
and
2014
securitizations have served to partially replace secured and unsecured debt in our capital structure with more favorable non-recourse funding. Our overall funding costs are positively impacted by our increased usage of securitizations as we typically execute these transactions at interest rates significantly below those of our maturing secured and unsecured debt.
The weighted average interest rates on our debt on a historical accounting basis were as follows:
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2014
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2013
Weighted average interest rate
5.42
%
5.33
%
5.31
%
5.57
%
88
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by SEC rules. We had no off-balance sheet exposure to losses associated with unconsolidated VIEs at
September 30, 2014
or
December 31, 2013
, other than certain representations and warranties associated with the sales of the mortgage-backed retained certificates during the first
nine
months of 2014. As of
September 30, 2014
, we had no repurchase activity related to these sales.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We describe our significant accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K. We consider the following policies to be our most critical accounting policies because they involve critical accounting estimates and a significant degree of management judgment:
•
allowance for finance receivable losses;
•
purchased credit impaired finance receivables;
•
TDR finance receivables;
•
push-down accounting; and
•
fair value measurements.
We believe the amount of the allowance for finance receivable losses is the most significant estimate we make. See “—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates — Allowance for Finance Receivable Losses” in Part II, Item 7 of our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the models and assumptions used to assess the adequacy of the allowance for finance receivable losses.
There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies or to our methodologies for deriving critical accounting estimates during the
nine
months ended
September 30, 2014
.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Seasonality
Our personal loan volume is generally highest during the second and fourth quarters of the year, primarily due to marketing efforts, seasonality of demand, and increased traffic in branches after the winter months. Demand for our personal loans is usually lower in January and February after the holiday season and as a result of tax refunds. Delinquencies on our personal loans tend to peak in the second and third quarters and higher net charge-offs on these loans usually occur at year end. These seasonal trends contribute to fluctuations in our operating results and cash needs throughout the year.
89
Table of Contents
Glossary of Terms
Average debt
average of debt for each day in the period
Average net receivables
average of net finance receivables at the beginning and end of each month in the period
Charge-off ratio
annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of the average of net finance receivables at the beginning of each month in the period
Delinquency ratio
UPB 60 days or more past due (greater than three payments unpaid) as a percentage of UPB
Gross charge-off ratio
annualized gross charge-offs as a percentage of the average of net finance receivables at the beginning of each month in the period
Trust Preferred Securities
capital securities classified as debt for accounting purposes but due to their terms are afforded, at least in part, equity capital treatment in the calculation of effective leverage by rating agencies
Loss ratio
annualized net charge-offs, net writedowns on real estate owned, net gain (loss) on sales of real estate owned, and operating expenses related to real estate owned as a percentage of the average of real estate loans at the beginning of each month in the period
Net interest income
interest income less interest expense
Recovery ratio
annualized recoveries on net charge-offs as a percentage of the average of net finance receivables at the beginning of each month in the period
Tangible equity
total equity less accumulated other comprehensive income or loss
Weighted average interest rate
annualized interest expense as a percentage of average debt
Yield
annualized finance charges as a percentage of average net receivables
90
Table of Contents
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
There have been no significant changes to our market risk previously disclosed in Part II, Item 7A of our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period. Based on their evaluation, and in light of the previously identified material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, as of
December 31, 2013
, described within the
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of
September 30, 2014
.
We have developed a remediation plan for this material weakness, including enhancing our complement of resources with accounting and internal control knowledge through additional hiring and/or training to implement and perform additional controls over the initial and subsequent accounting for certain complex non-routine transactions. We are currently implementing this plan. When fully implemented and operating effectively, such enhancements are expected to remediate the material weakness described above. However, we cannot provide any assurance that these remediation efforts will be successful or that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective as a result of these efforts.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
91
Table of Contents
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
See Note 13 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes to our risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our
2013
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
Exhibits are listed in the Exhibit Index beginning on page 95 herein.
92
Table of Contents
Signature
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SPRINGLEAF HOLDINGS, INC.
(Registrant)
Date:
November 14, 2014
By
/s/ Minchung (Macrina) Kgil
Minchung (Macrina) Kgil
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
93
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit
3.1
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Springleaf Holdings, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3.1) to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013.
3.2
Bylaws of Springleaf Holdings, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3.2) to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013.
4.1
Indenture, dated as of October 3, 2014, among SpringCastle America Funding, LLC, SpringCastle Credit Funding, LLC, SpringCastle Finance Funding, LLC, Wilmington Trust, National Association, Springleaf Finance, Inc., Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and U.S. Bank National Association. Incorporated by reference from Spring Holdings, Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K, dated October 6, 2014 (SEC Accession No. 0001104659-14-070339).
10.1
Springleaf Holdings, Inc. Annual Leadership Incentive Plan, dated July 31, 2014. Incorporated by reference from Exhibit (10.1) to Springleaf Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 4, 2014 (SEC Accession No. 0001584207-14-000014).
10.2 (a)
Commitment Letter, dated August 6, 2014, by and among Eighth Street Funding LLC, Eleventh Street Funding LLC, Twelfth Street Funding LLC, Fourteenth Street Funding LLC, Fifteenth Street Funding LLC, Seventeenth Street Funding LLC, Nineteenth Street Funding LLC, Springleaf Finance Corporation, and Credit Suisse (USA) Securities LLC.
10.3 (a)
Amended and Restated Commitment Letter, dated August 26, 2014, by and among Eighth Street Funding LLC, Eleventh Street Funding LLC, Twelfth Street Funding LLC, Fourteenth Street Funding LLC, Fifteenth Street Funding LLC, Seventeenth Street Funding LLC, Nineteenth Street Funding LLC, Springleaf Finance Corporation, and Credit Suisse (USA) Securities LLC.
10.4
Amendment No. 1 To Commitment Letter, dated September 30, 2014, by and among Eighth Street Funding LLC, Eleventh Street Funding LLC, Twelfth Street Funding LLC, Fourteenth Street Funding LLC, Fifteenth Street Funding LLC, Seventeenth Street Funding LLC, Nineteenth Street Funding LLC, Springleaf Finance Corporation, and Credit Suisse (USA) Securities LLC.
10.5 (a)
Mortgage Servicing Rights Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 1, 2014, by and among Springleaf Finance Corporation, MorEquity, Inc., and Nationstar Mortgage LLC.
10.6
Amendment No. 1 to Mortgage Servicing Rights Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 29, 2014, by and among Springleaf Finance Corporation, MorEquity, Inc., and Nationstar Mortgage LLC.
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Springleaf Holdings, Inc.
32
Section 1350 Certifications
101 (b)
Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss); (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity; (v) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
_______________________________
(a)
The Company has requested confidential treatment with respect to portions of this exhibit. Those portions have been omitted from the exhibit and filed separately with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
(b)
As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Section 11 and 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
94