Companies:
10,793
total market cap:
$140.575 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
This company appears to have been delisted
Reason: Acquired by Northwest Bancshares, Inc (NWBI)
Source:
https://investorrelations.northwest.bank/news/News-details/2025/Northwest-Bancshares-Inc--Completes-Acquisition-of-Penns-Woods-Bancorp-Inc-/default.aspx
Penns Woods Bancorp
PWOD
#8445
Rank
$0.22 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$30.00
Share price
0.00%
Change (1 day)
4.86%
Change (1 year)
๐ฆ Banks
๐ณ Financial services
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Penns Woods Bancorp
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Submitted on 2019-05-10
Penns Woods Bancorp - 10-Q quarterly report FY
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
ý
Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the Quarterly Period Ended
March 31, 2019
.
o
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act
For the Transition Period from to .
No. 0-17077
(Commission File Number)
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
PENNSYLVANIA
23-2226454
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
300 Market Street, P.O. Box 967 Williamsport, Pennsylvania
17703-0967
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(570) 322-1111
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES
ý
NO
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). YES
ý
NO
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer,
a smaller reporting company. or an emerging growth company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
x
Non-accelerated filer
o
Small reporting company
x
Emerging growth company
o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES
o
NO
ý
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol(s)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, $8.33 par value
PWOD
The Nasdaq Global Select Market
On
May 1, 2019
there were
4,692,305
shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.
Table of Contents
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
Page
Number
Part I
Financial Information
Item 1.
Financial Statements
3
Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited) as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018
3
Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018
4
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018
5
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018
6
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018
7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
8
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
28
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
41
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
41
Part II
Other Information
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
42
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
42
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
42
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
42
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
42
Item 5.
Other Information
42
Item 6.
Exhibits
43
Signatures
44
Exhibit Index and Exhibits
45
2
Table of Contents
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(UNAUDITED)
March 31,
December 31,
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
2019
2018
ASSETS:
Noninterest-bearing balances
$
31,211
$
24,325
Interest-bearing balances in other financial institutions
42,385
42,417
Total cash and cash equivalents
73,596
66,742
Investment debt securities, available for sale, at fair value
141,762
134,285
Investment equity securities, at fair value
1,819
1,776
Investment securities, trading
42
36
Restricted investment in bank stock, at fair value
15,725
18,862
Loans held for sale
1,787
2,929
Loans
1,384,470
1,384,757
Allowance for loan losses
(13,792
)
(13,837
)
Loans, net
1,370,678
1,370,920
Premises and equipment, net
33,270
27,580
Accrued interest receivable
5,542
5,334
Bank-owned life insurance
28,812
28,627
Goodwill
17,104
17,104
Intangibles
1,091
1,162
Operating lease right-of-use asset
4,239
—
Deferred tax asset
4,241
5,154
Other assets
5,000
4,260
TOTAL ASSETS
$
1,704,708
$
1,684,771
LIABILITIES:
Interest-bearing deposits
$
987,404
$
899,089
Noninterest-bearing deposits
321,657
320,814
Total deposits
1,309,061
1,219,903
Short-term borrowings
84,499
167,865
Long-term borrowings
144,631
138,942
Accrued interest payable
1,278
1,150
Operating lease liability
4,241
—
Other liabilities
13,962
13,367
TOTAL LIABILITIES
1,557,672
1,541,227
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, no par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
—
—
Common stock, par value $8.33, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 5,012,273 and 5,011,698 shares issued; 4,692,123 and 4,691,548 outstanding
41,767
41,763
Additional paid-in capital
50,890
50,737
Retained earnings
71,526
69,787
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss):
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities
197
(1,360
)
Defined benefit plan
(5,239
)
(5,276
)
Treasury stock at cost, 320,150
(12,115
)
(12,115
)
TOTAL PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC. SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
147,026
143,536
Non-controlling interest
10
8
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
147,036
143,544
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
$
1,704,708
$
1,684,771
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
2019
2018
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
Loans, including fees
$
14,869
$
12,193
Investment securities:
Taxable
934
546
Tax-exempt
174
241
Dividend and other interest income
457
221
TOTAL INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
16,434
13,201
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits
2,300
1,222
Short-term borrowings
605
224
Long-term borrowings
851
602
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE
3,756
2,048
NET INTEREST INCOME
12,678
11,153
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
360
160
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
12,318
10,993
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service charges
562
551
Net debt securities gains (losses), available for sale
13
(9
)
Net equity securities gains (losses)
43
(34
)
Net securities gains, trading
10
3
Bank-owned life insurance
168
173
Gain on sale of loans
316
255
Insurance commissions
134
117
Brokerage commissions
323
343
Debit card fees
310
333
Other
375
349
TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME
2,254
2,081
NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
Salaries and employee benefits
5,501
5,048
Occupancy
779
741
Furniture and equipment
752
747
Software amortization
207
65
Pennsylvania shares tax
293
277
Professional fees
522
566
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance
268
202
Marketing
102
251
Intangible amortization
71
80
Other
1,319
1,300
TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
9,814
9,277
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION
4,758
3,797
INCOME TAX PROVISION
812
589
CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME
$
3,946
$
3,208
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
2
(1
)
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
$
3,944
$
3,209
EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC
$
0.84
$
0.68
EARNINGS PER SHARE - DILUTED
$
0.84
$
0.68
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC
4,691,752
4,689,376
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - DILUTED
4,691,752
4,689,376
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE
$
0.47
$
0.47
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
2019
2018
Net Income
$
3,944
$
3,209
Other comprehensive income (loss) income:
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities
1,984
(1,461
)
Tax effect
(417
)
306
Net realized (gain) loss on available for sale securities included in net income
(13
)
9
Tax effect
3
(3
)
Amortization of unrecognized pension gain
47
42
Tax effect
(10
)
(8
)
Total other comprehensive gain (loss) income
1,594
(1,115
)
Comprehensive income
$
5,538
$
2,094
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
Three months ended:
COMMON STOCK
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN CAPITAL
RETAINED EARNINGS
ACCUMULATED OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
TREASURY STOCK
NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
SHARES
AMOUNT
Balance, December 31, 2018
5,011,698
$
41,763
$
50,737
$
69,787
$
(6,636
)
$
(12,115
)
$
8
$
143,544
Net income
3,944
2
3,946
Other comprehensive income
1,594
1,594
Stock-based compensation
136
136
Dividends declared ($0.47 per share)
(2,205
)
(2,205
)
Common shares issued for employee stock purchase plan
575
4
17
21
Balance, March 31, 2019
5,012,273
$
41,767
$
50,890
$
71,526
$
(5,042
)
$
(12,115
)
$
10
$
147,036
COMMON STOCK
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN CAPITAL
RETAINED EARNINGS
ACCUMULATED OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
TREASURY STOCK
NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
SHARES
AMOUNT
Balance, December 31, 2017
5,009,339
$
41,744
$
50,173
$
63,364
$
(4,974
)
$
(12,115
)
$
2
$
138,194
Net income
3,209
(1
)
3,208
Adoption of ASU 2016-01
537
(537
)
—
Other comprehensive loss
(1,115
)
(1,115
)
Stock-based compensation
7
7
Dividends declared ($0.47 per share)
(2,204
)
(2,204
)
Common shares issued for employee stock purchase plan
559
4
19
23
Balance, March 31, 2018
5,009,898
$
41,748
$
50,199
$
64,906
$
(6,626
)
$
(12,115
)
$
1
$
138,113
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
2019
2018
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income
$
3,946
$
3,208
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
691
386
Amortization of intangible assets
71
80
Provision for loan losses
360
160
Accretion and amortization of investment security discounts and premiums
157
195
Net securities (gains) losses, available for sale
(13
)
9
Originations of loans held for sale
(8,998
)
(8,762
)
Proceeds of loans held for sale
10,456
9,465
Gain on sale of loans
(316
)
(255
)
Net equity securities (gains) losses
(43
)
34
Net securities gains, trading
(10
)
(3
)
Proceeds from the sale of trading securities
77
233
Purchases of trading securities
(73
)
(222
)
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance
(168
)
(173
)
Decrease (increase) in deferred tax asset
499
(170
)
Other, net
(338
)
(561
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
6,298
3,624
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities
6,986
3,363
Proceeds from calls and maturities of available for sale securities
817
660
Purchases of available for sale securities
(12,962
)
(12,935
)
Net increase in loans
(169
)
(35,900
)
Acquisition of premises and equipment
(615
)
(323
)
Proceeds from the sale of foreclosed assets
117
16
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance
(26
)
(27
)
Security trades payable
—
(3,689
)
Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock
6,898
5,335
Purchases of regulatory stock
(3,761
)
(5,486
)
Net cash used for investing activities
(2,715
)
(48,986
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in interest-bearing deposits
88,315
45,189
Net increase in noninterest-bearing deposits
843
945
Proceeds from long-term borrowings
15,000
55,000
Repayment of long-term borrowings
(15,317
)
(2,000
)
Net decrease in short-term borrowings
(83,366
)
(41,443
)
Finance lease principal payments
(20
)
—
Dividends paid
(2,205
)
(2,204
)
Issuance of common stock
21
23
Net cash provided by financing activities
3,271
55,510
NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
6,854
10,148
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING
66,742
27,243
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING
$
73,596
$
37,391
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest paid
$
3,628
$
1,757
Income taxes paid
—
500
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Right-of-use lease assets obtained in exchange for lessee finance lease liabilities
6,026
—
Right-of-use lease assets obtained in exchange for lessee operating lease liabilities
4,298
—
Transfer of loans to foreclosed real estate
51
96
Transfer due to adoption of ASU 2016-01, equity securities fair value adjust, reclassification from AOCI to Retained Earnings, net of tax
—
537
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Woods Investment Company, Inc., Woods Real Estate Development Company, Inc., Luzerne Bank, and Jersey Shore State Bank (Jersey Shore State Bank and Luzerne Bank are referred to together as the “Banks”) and Jersey Shore State Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, The M Group, Inc. D/B/A The Comprehensive Financial Group (“The M Group”). The Company also owns a controlling interest in United Insurance Solutions, LLC. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.
The interim financial statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results for such periods. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2018
.
Newly Adopted Accounting Standards
In February 2016, the FASB issued the Leasing Standard, which is codified in ASC 842,
Leases
, and is intended to increase transparency and comparability among organizations and require lessees to record an right-of-use (ROU) asset and a liability representing the obligation to make lease payments for long-term leases. Accounting by lessors remains largely unchanged. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective transition under the option to apply the Leasing Standard at its effective date without adjusting the prior period comparative financial statements. Among other things, these updates require lessees to recognize a lease liability, measured on a discounted basis, related to the lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising under a lease contract; and a right-of-use asset related to the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. On January 1, 2019, the Company recorded operating lease liabilities and ROU asset of
$4.3 million
and finance lease liabilities and ROU asset of
$6.0 million
upon adoption of the Standard. The balance sheet effects of the new lease accounting standard also impacted regulatory capital ratios, performance ratios and other measures which are dependent upon asset or liability balances. For additional information and required disclosures related to ASC 842, see Note 13, “Leases.”
The accounting policies followed in the presentation of interim financial results are the same as those followed on an annual basis. These policies are presented on pages 41 through 50 of the Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2018
.
In reference to the attached financial statements, all adjustments are of a normal recurring nature pursuant to Rule 10-01(b) (8) of Regulation S-X.
Note 2. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component shown net of tax and parenthesis indicating debits, as of
March 31, 2019
and
2018
were as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Net Unrealized Loss
on Available
for Sale Securities
Defined
Benefit
Plan
Total
Net Unrealized Gain
(Loss) on Available
for Sale Securities
Defined
Benefit
Plan
Total
Beginning balance
$
(1,360
)
$
(5,276
)
$
(6,636
)
$
(54
)
$
(4,920
)
$
(4,974
)
Other comprehensive gain (loss) before reclassifications
1,567
—
1,567
(1,155
)
—
(1,155
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
(10
)
37
27
6
34
40
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
1,557
37
1,594
(1,149
)
34
(1,115
)
Reclassification from adoption of 2016-01
—
—
—
(537
)
—
(537
)
Ending balance
$
197
$
(5,239
)
$
(5,042
)
$
(1,740
)
$
(4,886
)
$
(6,626
)
8
Table of Contents
The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss shown, net of tax and parenthesis indicating debits to net income, as of
March 31, 2019
and
2018
were as follows:
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Affected Line Item
in the Consolidated
Statement of Income
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities
$
13
$
(9
)
Net debt securities gains (losses), available for sale
Income tax effect
(3
)
3
Income tax provision
Total reclassifications for the period
$
10
$
(6
)
Net unrecognized pension costs
$
(47
)
$
(42
)
Salaries and employee benefits
Income tax effect
10
8
Income tax provision
Total reclassifications for the period
$
(37
)
$
(34
)
Note 3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
, which changes the impairment model for most financial assets. This Update is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. The underlying premise of the Update is that financial assets measured at amortized cost should be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The allowance for credit losses should reflect management’s current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining life of a financial asset. The income statement will be effected for the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. With certain exceptions, transition to the new requirements will be through a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. We expect to recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective, but cannot yet determine the magnitude of any such one-time adjustment or the overall impact of the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04,
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the FASB eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2, an entity had to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, under the amendments in this Update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting units fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. A public business entity that is a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filer should adopt the amendments in this Update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. A public business entity that is not an SEC filer should adopt the amendments in this Update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. All other entities, including not-for-profit entities, that are adopting the amendments in this Update should do so for their annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13,
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurements
. The Update removes the requirement to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level I and Level II of the fair value hierarchy; the policy for timing of transfers between levels; and the valuation processes for Level III fair value measurements. The Update requires disclosure of changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income (loss) for recurring Level III fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level III fair value measurements. This Update is effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
9
Table of Contents
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14,
Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715-20).
This Update amends ASC 715 to add, remove and clarify disclosure requirements related to defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The Update eliminates the requirement to disclose the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as part of net periodic benefit cost over the next year. The Update also removes the disclosure requirements for the effects of a one-percentage-point change on the assumed health care costs and the effect of this change in rates on service cost, interest cost and the benefit obligation for postretirement health care benefits. This Update is effective for public business entities for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020, and must be applied on a retrospective basis. For all other entities, this Update is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2021. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15,
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40).
This Update addresses customers’ accounting for implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract and also adds certain disclosure requirements related to implementation costs incurred for internal-use software and cloud computing arrangements. The amendment aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license). This Update is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. The amendments in this Update can be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In October 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-16
, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)
. The amendments in this Update permit use of the Overnight Index Swap (OIS) rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes under Topic 815, in addition to the interest rates on direct Treasury obligations of the U.S. government, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) swap rate, the OIS rate based on the Fed Funds Effective Rate, and the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA) Municipal Swap Rate. For entities that have not already adopted Update 2017-12, the amendments in this Update are required to be adopted concurrently with the amendments in Update 2017-12. For public business entities that already have adopted the amendments in Update 2017-12, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities that already have adopted the amendments in Update 2017-12, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period upon issuance of this Update if an entity already has adopted Update 2017-12. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 018-18,
Collaborative Arrangements (Topic 808)
, which made the following targeted improvements to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for collaborative arrangements (1) clarified that certain transactions between collaborative arrangement participants should be accounted for as revenue under Topic 606 when the collaborative arrangement participant is a customer in the context of a unit of account, (2) add unit-of-account guidance in Topic 808 to align with the guidance in Topic 606 (that is, a distinct good or service) when an entity is assessing whether the collaborative arrangement or a part of the arrangement is within the scope of Topic 606, and (3) require that in a transaction with a collaborative arrangement participant that is not directly related to sales to third parties, presenting the transaction together with revenue recognized under Topic 606 is precluded if the collaborative arrangement participant is not a customer.
For public business entities, the amendments
in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In March 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-01,
Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements,
which addressed issues lessors sometimes encounter. Specifically addressed in this Update were issues related to (1) determining the fair value of the underlying asset by the lessor that are not manufacturers or dealers (generally financial institutions and captive finance companies), and 2) lessors that are depository and lending institutions should classify principal and payments received under sales-type and direct financing leases within investing activities in the cash flow statement. The ASU also exempts both lessees and lessors from having to provide the interim disclosures required by ASC 250-10-50-3 in the fiscal year in which a company adopts the new leases standard. The amendments addressing the two lessor accounting issues are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the effective date is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.
10
Table of Contents
In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04,
Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments, w
hich affects a variety of topics in the Codification and applies to all reporting entities within the scope of the affected accounting guidance. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
Note 4. Per Share Data
There are
no
convertible securities which would affect the denominator in calculating basic and dilutive earnings per share. There were a total of
423,700
stock options, with an average exercise price of
$43.94
, outstanding on
March 31, 2019
. All options were excluded, on a weighted average basis, in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the period due to the average market price of common shares being $
40.10
for the period. There were a total of
118,500
stock options outstanding for the same period end in 2018 that had an average exercise price of
$43.91
and were excluded, on a weighted average basis, in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the quarterly average closing market price of common shares was
$40.36
. for the period. Net income as presented on the consolidated statement of income is used as the numerator. The following table sets forth the composition of the weighted average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and dilutive earnings per share computation.
Three Months Ended March 31,
2019
2018
Weighted average common shares issued
5,011,902
5,009,526
Weighted average treasury stock shares
(320,150
)
(320,150
)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted
4,691,752
4,689,376
Note 5. Investment Securities
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair values of our investment securities portfolio at
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
are as follows:
March 31, 2019
Gross
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Fair
(In Thousands)
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
Available for sale (AFS):
Mortgage-backed securities
$
6,120
$
9
$
(149
)
$
5,980
State and political securities
85,456
1,632
(130
)
86,958
Other debt securities
49,937
69
(1,182
)
48,824
Total debt securities
$
141,513
$
1,710
$
(1,461
)
$
141,762
Investment equity securities:
Financial institution equity securities
$
328
$
252
$
—
$
580
Other equity securities
1,300
—
(61
)
1,239
Investment equity securities
$
1,628
$
252
$
(61
)
$
1,819
Trading:
Other equity securities
$
50
$
—
$
(8
)
$
42
11
Table of Contents
December 31, 2018
Gross
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Unrealized
Fair
(In Thousands)
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
Available for sale (AFS):
Mortgage-backed securities
$
6,385
$
8
$
(240
)
$
6,153
State and political securities
79,358
609
(426
)
79,541
Other debt securities
50,264
17
(1,690
)
48,591
Total debt securities
$
136,007
$
634
$
(2,356
)
$
134,285
Investment equity securities:
Financial institution equity securities
$
328
$
224
$
—
$
552
Other equity securities
1,300
—
(76
)
1,224
Investment equity securities
$
1,628
$
224
$
(76
)
$
1,776
Trading:
Other equity securities
$
49
$
—
$
(13
)
$
36
Total net trading gains of
$10,000
for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
along with net trading gains of
$3,000
for the
three months ended March 31, 2018
are included in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
The following tables show the Company’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time, that the individual debt securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
.
March 31, 2019
Less than Twelve Months
Twelve Months or Greater
Total
Gross
Gross
Gross
Fair
Unrealized
Fair
Unrealized
Fair
Unrealized
(In Thousands)
Value
Losses
Value
Losses
Value
Losses
Available for sale (AFS):
Mortgage-backed securities
$
1,168
$
(9
)
$
4,612
$
(140
)
$
5,780
$
(149
)
State and political securities
2,409
(1
)
6,559
(129
)
8,968
(130
)
Other debt securities
5,765
(14
)
36,588
(1,168
)
42,353
(1,182
)
Total debt securities
$
9,342
$
(24
)
$
47,759
$
(1,437
)
$
57,101
$
(1,461
)
December 31, 2018
Less than Twelve Months
Twelve Months or Greater
Total
Gross
Gross
Gross
Fair
Unrealized
Fair
Unrealized
Fair
Unrealized
(In Thousands)
Value
Losses
Value
Losses
Value
Losses
Available for sale (AFS):
Mortgage-backed securities
$
3,023
$
(75
)
$
2,930
$
(165
)
$
5,953
$
(240
)
State and political securities
14,819
(128
)
13,648
(298
)
28,467
(426
)
Other debt securities
10,133
(153
)
34,776
(1,537
)
44,909
(1,690
)
Total debt securities
$
27,975
$
(356
)
$
51,354
$
(2,000
)
$
79,329
$
(2,356
)
At
March 31, 2019
, there were a total of
6
securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and
36
individual securities that were in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or greater.
12
Table of Contents
The Company reviews its position quarterly and has determined that, at
March 31, 2019
, the declines outlined in the above table represent temporary declines and the Company does not intend to sell and does not believe it will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be at maturity. The Company has concluded that the unrealized losses disclosed above are not other than temporary but are the result of interest rate changes, sector credit ratings changes, or company-specific ratings changes that are not expected to result in the non-collection of principal and interest during the period.
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at
March 31, 2019
, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
(In Thousands)
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Due in one year or less
$
3,708
$
3,713
Due after one year to five years
45,818
45,010
Due after five years to ten years
69,669
70,352
Due after ten years
22,318
22,687
Total
$
141,513
$
141,762
Total gross proceeds from sales of debt securities available for sale for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
was
$6,986,000
, an
increase
from the
2018
total $
3,363,000
.
The following table represents gross realized gains and losses from the sales of debt securities available for sale:
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
2019
2018
Available for sale (AFS):
Gross realized gains:
State and political securities
$
15
$
—
Other debt securities
4
—
Total gross realized gains
$
19
$
—
Gross realized losses:
State and political securities
$
2
$
9
Other debt securities
4
—
Total gross realized losses
$
6
$
9
There were
no
impairment charges included in gross realized losses for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
, respectively.
Investment securities with a carrying value of approximately
$81,179,000
and
$73,327,000
at
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively, were pledged to secure certain deposits, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes as required by law.
At
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, we had
$1,819,000
and
$1,776,000
, respectively, in equity securities recorded at fair value. Prior to January 1, 2018, equity securities were stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of AOCI, net of tax. At December 31, 2017, net unrealized gains of
$537,000
had been recognized in AOCI. On January 1, 2018, these unrealized gains and losses were reclassified out of AOCI and into retained earnings with subsequent changes in fair value being recognized in net equity securities gains (losses). The following is a summary of unrealized and realized gains and losses recognized in net income on equity securities during the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
:
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
2019
2018
Net gains (losses) recognized in equity securities during the period
$
43
$
(34
)
Less: Net gains (losses) realized on the sale of equity securities during the period
—
—
Unrealized gains (losses) recognized in equity securities held at reporting date
$
43
(34
)
13
Table of Contents
Net gains and losses on trading account securities are as follows for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
:
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
2019
2018
Net gains (losses) on sale transactions
$
5
$
(15
)
Net mark-to-market gains (losses)
5
18
Net gain (loss) on trading account securities
$
10
$
3
Note 6.
Loans
Management segments the Banks' loan portfolio to a level that enables risk and performance monitoring according to similar risk characteristics. Loans are segmented based on the underlying collateral characteristics. Categories include commercial, financial, and agricultural, real estate, and installment loans. Real estate loans are further segmented into
three
categories: residential, commercial, and construction, while installment loans are classified as either consumer automobile loans or other installment loans.
The following table presents the related aging categories of loans, by segment, as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
:
March 31, 2019
Past Due
Past Due 90
30 To 89
Days Or More
Non-
(In Thousands)
Current
Days
& Still Accruing
Accrual
Total
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
$
189,540
$
79
$
32
$
5,266
$
194,917
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
611,264
4,430
947
1,918
618,559
Commercial
357,600
2,057
267
7,165
367,089
Construction
38,922
287
—
72
39,281
Consumer automobile loans
139,462
301
—
74
139,837
Other consumer installment loans
23,243
545
22
31
23,841
1,360,031
$
7,699
$
1,268
$
14,526
1,383,524
Net deferred loan fees and discounts
946
946
Allowance for loan losses
(13,792
)
(13,792
)
Loans, net
$
1,347,185
$
1,370,678
December 31, 2018
Past Due
Past Due 90
30 To 89
Days Or More
Non-
(In Thousands)
Current
Days
& Still Accruing
Accrual
Total
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
$
182,651
$
616
$
—
$
5,294
$
188,561
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
611,281
7,688
1,238
2,172
622,379
Commercial
361,624
2,349
—
7,722
371,695
Construction
43,144
305
—
74
43,523
Consumer automobile loans
132,713
412
27
31
133,183
Other consumer installment loans
23,902
636
9
5
24,552
1,355,315
$
12,006
$
1,274
$
15,298
1,383,893
Net deferred loan fees and discounts
864
864
Allowance for loan losses
(13,837
)
(13,837
)
Loans, net
$
1,342,342
$
1,370,920
14
Table of Contents
The following table presents interest income the Banks would have recorded if interest had been recorded based on the original loan agreement terms and rate of interest for non-accrual loans and interest income recognized on a cash basis for non-accrual loans for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
:
Three Months Ended March 31,
2019
2018
(In Thousands)
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
$
24
$
39
$
1
$
—
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
33
23
31
11
Commercial
89
40
61
17
Construction
1
1
—
—
Consumer automobile loans
2
1
—
—
Other consumer installment loans
1
—
—
—
$
150
$
104
$
93
$
28
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans are loans for which it is probable the Banks will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The Banks evaluate such loans for impairment individually and do not aggregate loans by major risk classifications. The definition of “impaired loans” is not the same as the definition of “non-accrual loans,” although the two categories overlap. The Banks may choose to place a loan on non-accrual status due to payment delinquency or uncertain collectability, while not classifying the loan as impaired. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status and collateral value. The amount of impairment for these types of loans is determined by the difference between the present value of the expected cash flows related to the loan, using the original interest rate, and its recorded value, or as a practical expedient in the case of collateralized loans, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded amount of the loan. When foreclosure is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.
Management evaluates individual loans in all of the commercial segments for possible impairment if the loan is greater than
$100,000
and if the loan is either on non-accrual status or has a risk rating of substandard. Management may also elect to measure an individual loan for impairment if less than
$100,000
on a case-by-case basis.
Mortgage loans on one-to-four family properties and all consumer loans are large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans and are measured for impairment collectively. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as
90
days or less, generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration all circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower including the length of the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Interest income for impaired loans is recorded consistent with the Banks' policy on non-accrual loans.
15
Table of Contents
The following table presents the recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance of impaired loans by segment as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
:
March 31, 2019
Recorded
Unpaid Principal
Related
(In Thousands)
Investment
Balance
Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
$
1,242
$
1,242
$
—
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
2,372
2,372
—
Commercial
3,238
3,238
—
Construction
72
72
—
Consumer automobile loans
5
5
—
Installment loans to individuals
5
5
—
6,934
6,934
—
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
4,100
4,100
644
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
1,743
1,742
286
Commercial
7,236
7,236
1,253
Construction
—
—
—
Consumer automobile loans
68
68
32
Installment loans to individuals
26
26
13
13,173
13,172
2,228
Total:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
5,342
5,342
644
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
4,115
4,114
286
Commercial
10,474
10,474
1,253
Construction
72
72
—
Consumer automobile loans
73
73
32
Installment loans to individuals
31
31
13
$
20,107
$
20,106
$
2,228
16
Table of Contents
December 31, 2018
Recorded
Unpaid Principal
Related
(In Thousands)
Investment
Balance
Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
$
1,152
$
1,152
$
—
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
2,619
2,619
—
Commercial
2,457
2,457
—
Construction
74
74
—
Consumer automobile loans
31
31
—
Installment loans to individuals
—
—
—
6,333
6,333
—
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
4,111
4,111
650
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
1,591
1,591
168
Commercial
9,207
9,207
1,720
Construction
—
—
—
Consumer automobile loans
—
—
—
Installment loans to individuals
5
5
5
14,914
14,914
2,543
Total:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
5,263
5,263
650
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
4,210
4,210
168
Commercial
11,664
11,664
1,720
Construction
74
74
—
Consumer automobile loans
31
31
—
Installment loans to individuals
5
5
5
$
21,247
$
21,247
$
2,543
The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the
three
months ended for
March 31, 2019
and
2018
:
Three Months Ended March 31,
2019
2018
(In Thousands)
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
$
5,302
$
1
$
38
$
1,259
$
17
$
—
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
4,163
28
17
4,098
38
11
Commercial
11,069
31
36
9,430
58
17
Construction
73
—
1
—
—
—
Consumer automobile
52
—
1
—
—
—
Other consumer installment loans
18
—
—
—
—
$
20,677
$
60
$
93
$
14,787
$
113
$
28
Currently, there is
$3,000
committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.
17
Table of Contents
Troubled Debt Restructurings
The loan portfolio also includes certain loans that have been modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced or are expected to experience financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions. Certain TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructure and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally
six months
.
There were no loan modifications considered TDRs completed during the three months ended March 31, 2019. Loan modifications that are considered TDRs completed during the three months ended March 31, 2018 were as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31,
2018
(In Thousands, Except Number of Contracts)
Number
of
Contracts
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
—
$
—
$
—
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
2
102
120
Commercial
1
106
106
3
$
208
$
226
There were no loan modifications considered to be TDRs made during the twelve months previous to
March 31, 2019
that defaulted during the
three months ended
March 31, 2019
. There were no loan modifications considered TDRs made during the twelve months previous to March 31, 2018 that defaulted during the
three
months ended
March 31, 2018
.
Troubled debt restructurings amounted to
$8,836,000
and
$9,599,000
as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively.
The amount of foreclosed residential real estate held at
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, totaled
$536,000
and
$624,000
, respectively. Consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process at
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, totaled
$189,000
and
$167,000
, respectively.
Internal Risk Ratings
Management uses a ten point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first
six
categories are considered not criticized, and are aggregated as “Pass” rated. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The special mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a substandard classification. Loans in the substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than
90
days past due are evaluated for substandard classification. Loans in the doubtful category exhibit the same weaknesses found in the substandard loans, however, the weaknesses are more pronounced. Such loans are static and collection in full is improbable. However, these loans are not yet rated as loss because certain events may occur which would salvage the debt. Loans classified loss are considered uncollectible and charge-off is imminent.
To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Banks have a structured loan rating process with several layers of internal and external oversight. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the pass category unless a specific action, such as bankruptcy, repossession, or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. An external annual loan review of large commercial relationships is performed, as well as a sample of smaller transactions. Confirmation of the appropriate risk category is included in the review. Detailed reviews, including plans for resolution, are performed on loans classified as substandard, doubtful, or loss on a quarterly basis.
18
Table of Contents
The following table presents the credit quality categories identified above as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
:
March 31, 2019
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
Real Estate Mortgages
Consumer automobile
Other consumer installment loans
(In Thousands)
Residential
Commercial
Construction
Totals
Pass
$
186,169
$
616,004
$
348,504
$
39,268
$
139,837
$
23,841
$
1,353,623
Special Mention
3,430
691
6,449
—
—
—
10,570
Substandard
5,318
1,864
12,136
13
—
—
19,331
$
194,917
$
618,559
$
367,089
$
39,281
$
139,837
$
23,841
$
1,383,524
December 31, 2018
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
Real Estate Mortgages
Consumer automobile
Other consumer installment loans
(In Thousands)
Residential
Commercial
Construction
Totals
Pass
$
179,840
$
619,800
$
351,703
$
43,523
$
133,183
$
24,552
$
1,352,601
Special Mention
3,426
694
6,587
—
—
—
10,707
Substandard
5,295
1,885
13,405
—
—
20,585
$
188,561
$
622,379
$
371,695
$
43,523
$
133,183
$
24,552
$
1,383,893
Allowance for Loan Losses
An allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is maintained to absorb losses from the loan portfolio. The ALL is based on management’s continuing evaluation of the risk characteristics and credit quality of the loan portfolio, assessment of current economic conditions, diversification and size of the portfolio, adequacy of collateral, past and anticipated future loss experience, and the amount of non-performing loans.
The Banks' methodology for determining the ALL is based on the requirements of ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment (previously discussed) and ASC Subtopic 450-20 for loans collectively evaluated for impairment, as well as the Interagency Policy Statements on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and other bank regulatory guidance. The total of the
two
components represents the Banks' ALL.
Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are analyzed with general allowances being made as appropriate. Allowances are segmented based on collateral characteristics previously disclosed, and consistent with credit quality monitoring. Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are grouped into
two
classes for evaluation. A general allowance is determined for “Pass” rated credits, while a separate pool allowance is provided for “Criticized” rated credits that are not individually evaluated for impairment.
For the general allowances, historical loss trends are used in the estimation of losses in the current portfolio. These historical loss amounts are modified by other qualitative factors. A historical charge-off factor is calculated utilizing a
twelve
quarter moving average. However, management may adjust the moving average time frame by up to four quarters to adjust for variances in the economic cycle. Management has identified a number of additional qualitative factors which it uses to supplement the historical charge-off factor because these factors are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the existing loan pools to differ from historical loss experience. The additional factors that are evaluated quarterly and updated using information obtained from internal, regulatory, and governmental sources are: national and local economic trends and conditions; levels of and trends in delinquency rates and non-accrual loans; trends in volumes and terms of loans; effects of changes in lending policies; experience, ability, and depth of lending staff; value of underlying collateral; and concentrations of credit from a loan type, industry and/or geographic standpoint.
Loans in the criticized pools, which possess certain qualities or characteristics that may lead to collection and loss issues, are closely monitored by management and subject to additional qualitative factors. Management also monitors industry loss factors by loan segment for applicable adjustments to actual loss experience.
Management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the ALL. When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the ALL.
19
Table of Contents
Activity in the allowance is presented for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
Real Estate Mortgages
Consumer automobile
Other consumer installment
(In Thousands)
Residential
Commercial
Construction
Unallocated
Totals
Beginning Balance
$
1,680
$
5,616
$
4,047
$
143
$
1,328
$
259
$
764
$
13,837
Charge-offs
(50
)
(73
)
(139
)
—
(100
)
(96
)
—
(458
)
Recoveries
6
1
—
5
26
15
—
53
Provision
96
186
(106
)
(18
)
148
100
(46
)
360
Ending Balance
$
1,732
$
5,730
$
3,802
$
130
$
1,402
$
278
$
718
$
13,792
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
Real Estate Mortgages
Consumer automobile
Other consumer installment
(In Thousands)
Residential
Commercial
Construction
Unallocated
Totals
Beginning Balance
$
1,177
$
5,679
$
4,277
$
155
$
804
$
271
$
495
$
12,858
Charge-offs
(33
)
(51
)
(55
)
—
(30
)
(71
)
—
(240
)
Recoveries
7
24
—
2
1
24
—
58
Provision
221
4
(219
)
(1
)
241
81
(167
)
160
Ending Balance
$
1,372
$
5,656
$
4,003
$
156
$
1,016
$
305
$
328
$
12,836
The shift in allocation of the loan provision is primarily due to portfolio growth and changes in the credit metrics within the real estate mortgage portfolio.
The Company grants commercial, industrial, residential, and installment loans to customers primarily throughout north-east and central Pennsylvania. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent on the economic conditions within this region.
The Company has a concentration of the following to gross loans at
March 31, 2019
and
2018
:
March 31,
2019
2018
Owners of residential rental properties
14.82
%
15.00
%
Owners of commercial rental properties
12.07
%
13.16
%
The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment based on impairment method as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
:
March 31, 2019
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
Real Estate Mortgages
Consumer Automobile
Other consumer installment
Unallocated
(In Thousands)
Residential
Commercial
Construction
Totals
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
644
$
286
$
1,253
$
—
$
32
$
13
$
—
$
2,228
Collectively evaluated for impairment
1,088
5,444
2,549
130
1,370
265
718
11,564
Total ending allowance balance
$
1,732
$
5,730
$
3,802
$
130
$
1,402
$
278
$
718
$
13,792
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
5,342
$
4,115
$
10,474
$
72
$
73
$
31
$
20,107
Collectively evaluated for impairment
189,575
614,444
356,615
39,209
139,764
23,810
1,363,417
Total ending loans balance
$
194,917
$
618,559
$
367,089
$
39,281
$
139,837
$
23,841
$
1,383,524
20
Table of Contents
December 31, 2018
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
Real Estate Mortgages
Consumer Automobile
Other consumer installment
Unallocated
(In Thousands)
Residential
Commercial
Construction
Totals
Allowance for Loan Losses:
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
650
$
168
$
1,720
$
—
$
—
$
5
$
—
$
2,543
Collectively evaluated for impairment
1,030
5,448
2,327
143
1,328
254
764
11,294
Total ending allowance balance
$
1,680
$
5,616
$
4,047
$
143
$
1,328
$
259
$
764
$
13,837
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment
$
5,263
$
4,210
$
11,664
$
74
$
31
$
5
$
21,247
Collectively evaluated for impairment
183,298
618,169
360,031
43,449
133,152
24,547
1,362,646
Total ending loans balance
$
188,561
$
622,379
$
371,695
$
43,523
$
133,183
$
24,552
$
1,383,893
Note 7. Net Periodic Benefit Cost-Defined Benefit Plans
For a detailed disclosure on the Company’s pension and employee benefits plans, please refer to Note 13 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2018
.
The following sets forth the components of the net periodic benefit/cost of the domestic non-contributory defined benefit plan for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
, respectively:
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
2019
2018
Service cost
$
—
$
—
Interest cost
191
176
Expected return on plan assets
(249
)
(274
)
Amortization of net loss
47
42
Net periodic (benefit) cost
$
(11
)
$
(56
)
Employer Contributions
The Company previously disclosed in its consolidated financial statements, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2018
, that it expected to contribute a minimum of
$500,000
to its defined benefit plan in
2019
. As of
March 31, 2019
, there were contributions of
$250,000
made to the plan with additional contributions of at least
$250,000
anticipated during the remainder of
2019
.
Note 8. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company maintains an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Plan”). The Plan is intended to encourage employee participation in the ownership and economic progress of the Company. The Plan allows for up to
1,000,000
shares to be purchased by employees. The purchase price of the shares is
95%
of market value with an employee eligible to purchase up to the lesser of
15%
of base compensation or
$12,000
in market value annually. During the
three months ended March 31, 2019
and
2018
, there were
575
and
559
shares issued under the plan, respectively.
21
Table of Contents
Note 9. Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments are primarily comprised of commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and credit exposure from the sale of assets with recourse. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, or liquidity risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The contract amounts of these instruments express the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss from nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The Company may require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk.
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk are as follows at
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
:
(In Thousands)
March 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Commitments to extend credit
$
140,732
$
166,417
Standby letters of credit
9,883
10,566
Credit exposure from the sale of assets with recourse
6,242
6,152
$
156,857
$
183,135
Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to customers. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of fees. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company, on an extension of credit is based on management’s credit assessment of the counterparty.
Standby letters of credit represent conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. These instruments are issued primarily to support bid or performance related contracts. The coverage period for these instruments is typically a
one year
period with an annual renewal option subject to prior approval by management. Fees earned from the issuance of these letters are recognized upon expiration of the coverage period. For secured letters of credit, the collateral is typically Bank deposit instruments or customer business assets.
Note 10. Fair Value Measurements
The following disclosures show the hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observations utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value.
Level I:
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
Level II:
Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities include items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
Level III:
Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.
This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.
22
Table of Contents
The following table presents the assets reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value on a recurring basis as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
March 31, 2019
(In Thousands)
Level I
Level II
Level III
Total
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities, available for sale:
Mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
5,980
$
—
$
5,980
State and political securities
—
86,958
—
86,958
Other debt securities
—
48,824
—
48,824
Investment equity securities:
Financial institution equity securities
580
—
—
580
Other equity securities
1,239
—
—
1,239
Investment securities, trading:
Other equity securities
42
—
—
42
December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Level I
Level II
Level III
Total
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
Investment securities, available for sale:
Mortgage-backed securities
$
—
$
6,153
$
—
$
6,153
State and political securities
—
79,541
—
79,541
Other debt securities
—
48,591
—
48,591
Financial institution equity securities
552
—
—
552
Other equity securities
1,224
—
—
1,224
Investment securities, trading:
Other equity securities
36
—
—
36
The following table presents the assets reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value on a non-recurring basis as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
March 31, 2019
(In Thousands)
Level I
Level II
Level III
Total
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans
$
—
$
—
$
17,879
$
17,879
Other real estate owned
—
—
325
325
December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Level I
Level II
Level III
Total
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired loans
$
—
$
—
$
18,704
$
18,704
Other real estate owned
—
—
402
402
23
Table of Contents
The following tables present a listing of significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement process for items valued utilizing level III techniques as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
:
March 31, 2019
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
(In Thousands)
Fair Value
Valuation Technique(s)
Unobservable Inputs
Range
Weighted Average
Impaired loans
$
11,607
Discounted cash flow
Temporary reduction in payment amount
17% to (70)%
(35)%
6,272
Appraisal of collateral
(1)
Appraisal adjustments
(1)
0 to (40)%
(6)%
Other real estate owned
$
325
Appraisal of collateral
(1)
Appraisal adjustments
(1)
(20)%
(20)%
(1)
Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.
December 31, 2018
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
(In Thousands)
Fair Value
Valuation Technique(s)
Unobservable Inputs
Range
Weighted Average
Impaired loans
$
12,929
Discounted cash flow
Temporary reduction in payment amount
7 to (70)%
(6)%
5,775
Appraisal of collateral
(1)
Appraisal adjustments
(1)
0 to (90)%
(20)%
Other real estate owned
$
402
Appraisal of collateral
(1)
Appraisal adjustments
(1)
(20)%
(20)%
(1)
Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.
The discounted cash flow valuation technique is utilized to determine the fair value of performing impaired loans, while non-performing impaired loans utilize the appraisal of collateral method.
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the discounted cash flow valuation technique include temporary changes in payment amounts and the probability of default. Significant increases (decreases) in payment amounts would result in significantly higher (lower) fair value measurements. The probability of default is
0%
for impaired loans using the discounted cash flow valuation technique because all defaulted impaired loans are valued using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique.
The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique include appraisal adjustments, which are adjustments to appraisals by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s other real estate owned are the same inputs used to value impaired loans using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique.
Note 11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company is required to disclose fair values for its financial instruments. Fair values are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Also, it is the Company’s general practice and intention to hold most of its financial instruments to maturity and not to engage in trading or sales activities. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These fair values are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions can significantly affect the fair values.
Fair values have been determined by the Company using historical data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments. The Company’s fair values, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s other financial instruments.
24
Table of Contents
As certain assets and liabilities, such as deferred tax assets, premises and equipment, and many other operational elements of the Company, are not considered financial instruments but have value, this fair value of financial instruments would not represent the full market value of the Company.
The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments not recorded at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis are as follows at
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
:
Carrying
Fair
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2019
(In Thousands)
Value
Value
Level I
Level II
Level III
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (1)
$
73,596
$
73,596
$
73,596
$
—
$
—
Restricted investment in bank stock (1)
15,725
15,725
15,725
—
—
Loans held for sale (1)
1,787
1,787
1,787
—
—
Loans, net
1,370,678
1,388,307
—
—
1,388,307
Bank-owned life insurance (1)
28,812
28,812
28,812
—
—
Accrued interest receivable (1)
5,542
5,542
5,542
—
—
Financial liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits
$
987,404
$
987,829
$
721,366
$
—
$
266,463
Noninterest-bearing deposits (1)
321,657
321,657
321,657
—
—
Short-term borrowings (1)
84,499
84,499
84,499
—
—
Long-term borrowings
144,631
144,776
—
—
144,776
Accrued interest payable (1)
1,278
1,278
1,278
—
—
(1) The financial instrument is carried at cost at
March 31, 2019
, which approximate the fair value of the instruments
Carrying
Fair
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Value
Value
Level I
Level II
Level III
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (1)
$
66,742
$
66,742
$
66,742
$
—
$
—
Restricted investment in bank stock (1)
18,862
18,862
18,862
—
—
Loans held for sale (1)
2,929
2,929
2,929
—
—
Loans, net
1,370,920
1,381,581
—
—
1,381,581
Bank-owned life insurance (1)
28,627
28,627
28,627
—
—
Accrued interest receivable (1)
5,334
5,334
5,334
—
—
Financial liabilities:
Interest-bearing deposits
$
899,089
$
882,108
$
612,478
$
—
$
269,630
Noninterest-bearing deposits (1)
320,814
320,814
320,814
—
—
Short-term borrowings (1)
167,865
167,865
167,865
—
—
Long-term borrowings
138,942
137,773
—
—
137,773
Accrued interest payable (1)
1,150
1,150
1,150
—
—
(1) The financial instrument is carried at cost at
December 31, 2018
, which approximate the fair value of the instruments
The methods and assumptions used by the Company in estimating fair values of financial instruments at
March 31, 2019
is in accordance with ASC Topic 825,
Financial Instruments
, as amended by ASU 2016-01 which requires public entities to use exit pricing in the calculation of the above tables.
Loans:
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, financial, and agricultural, commercial real estate, residential real estate, construction real estate, and installment loans to individuals. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming categories.
The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan. The estimate of maturity is based on the
25
Table of Contents
Company’s historical experience with repayments for each loan classification, modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions.
Fair value for significant nonperforming loans is based on recent external appraisals. If appraisals are not available, estimated cash flows are discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated cash flows. Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows, and discounted rates are judgmentally determined using available market information and specific borrower information.
Deposits:
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as savings, NOW, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.
Long Term Borrowings:
The fair value of long term borrowings is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.
Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit, and Financial Guarantees Written:
There is no material difference between the notional amount and the estimated fair value of off-balance sheet items. The contractual amounts of unfunded commitments and letters of credit are presented in Note 9 (Off-Balance Sheet Risk).
Note 12. Stock Options
In 2014, the Company adopted the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan designed to help the Company attract, retain, and motivate employees and non-employee directors. Incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, and restricted stock may be granted as part of the plan.
As of January 1, 2019, the Company had a total of
263,700
stock options outstanding. During the period ended March 31, 2019, the Company issued
160,000
stock options with a strike price of
$42.01
to a group of employees. The options granted in 2019 all expire
ten
years from the grant date. Of the
160,000
grants awarded in 2019,
80,600
of the options have a
three
year vesting period while the remaining
79,400
options vest in
five
years.
Stock Options Granted
Date
Shares
Forfeited
Outstanding
Strike Price
Vesting Period
Expiration
March 15, 2019
80,600
—
80,600
$
42.01
3 years
10 years
March 15, 2019
79,400
—
79,400
42.01
5 years
10 years
August 24, 2018
50,200
—
50,200
46.00
3 years
10 years
August 24, 2018
99,500
—
99,500
46.00
5 years
10 years
January 5, 2018
12,500
—
12,500
45.11
3 years
10 years
January 5, 2018
12,500
—
12,500
45.11
5 years
10 years
March 24, 2017
46,250
(4,500
)
41,750
44.21
3 years
10 years
March 24, 2017
23,750
—
23,750
44.21
5 years
10 years
August 27, 2015
38,750
(15,250
)
23,500
42.03
5 years
10 years
26
Table of Contents
A summary of stock option activity is presented below:
March 31, 2019
March 31, 2018
Shares
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Shares
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year
263,700
$
45.12
93,500
$
43.59
Granted
160,000
42.01
25,000
45.11
Exercised
—
—
—
—
Forfeited
—
—
—
—
Expired
—
—
—
—
Outstanding, end of period
423,700
$
43.94
118,500
$
43.91
Exercisable, end of period
—
$
—
—
$
—
The estimated fair value of options, including the effect of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straightline basis over the options’ vesting periods while ensuring that the cumulative amount of compensation cost recognized at least equals the value of the vested portion of the award at that date. The Company determines the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury bond with a similar term to the expected life of the options at the grant date. Expected volatility was estimated based on the adjusted historic volatility of the Company’s shares. The expected life was estimated to equal the contractual life of the options. The dividend yield rate was based upon recent historical dividends paid on shares.
Compensation expense for stock options is recognized using the fair value when the stock options are granted and is amortized over the options' vesting period. Compensation expense related to stock options was
$136,000
for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
compared to
$7,000
for the same period of
2018
. As of
March 31, 2019
,
no
stock options were exercisable and the weighted average years to expiration was
9.19 years
. The fair value of options granted during the
three months ended March 31, 2019
was approximately
$1,208,000
or
$7.55
per award. Total unrecognized compensation cost for non-vested options was
$2,528,000
and will be recognized over their weighted average remaining vesting period of
3.69 years
.
Note 13. Leases
The following table shows finance lease right of use assets and finance lease liabilities as of
March 31, 2019
:
(In Thousands)
Statement of Financial Condition classification
March 31, 2019
Finance lease right of use assets
Premises and equipment, net
$
5,960
Finance lease liabilities
Long-term borrowings
$
6,006
The following table shows the components of finance and operating lease expense for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
:
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
2019
Finance Lease Cost:
Amortization of right-of-use asset
$
65
Interest expense
56
Operating lease cost
88
Variable lease cost
1
Total Lease Cost
$
210
Gross rental expense for the
three months ended March 31, 2018
was
$130,000
.
27
Table of Contents
A maturity analysis of operating and finance lease liabilities and reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to the total operating lease liability is as follows:
(In Thousands)
Operating
Finance
2019
$
274
$
243
2020
370
318
2021
378
320
2022
385
321
2023
360
322
2024 and thereafter
3,969
8,494
Total undiscounted cash flows
5,736
10,018
Discount on cash flows
(1,495
)
(4,012
)
Total lease liability
$
4,241
$
6,006
The following table shows the weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate for both operating and finance leases outstanding as of
March 31, 2019
.
Operating
Finance
Weighted-average term (years)
18.3
28.0
Weighted-average discount rate
3.49
%
3.73
%
Note 14. Reclassification of Comparative Amounts
Certain comparative amounts for the prior period have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations. Such reclassifications had
no
effect on net income or shareholders’ equity.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This Report contains certain “forward-looking statements” including statements concerning plans, objectives, future events or performance and assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical fact. The Company cautions readers that the following important factors, among others, may have affected and could in the future affect the Company’s actual results and could cause the Company’s actual results for subsequent periods to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company herein: (i) the effect of changes in laws and regulations, including federal and state banking laws and regulations, with which the Company must comply, and the associated costs of compliance with such laws and regulations either currently or in the future as applicable; (ii) the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies as well as by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or of changes in the Company’s organization, compensation and benefit plans; (iii) the effect on the Company’s competitive position within its market area of the increasing consolidation within the banking and financial services industries, including the increased competition from larger regional and out-of-state banking organizations as well as non-bank providers of various financial services; (iv) the effect of changes in interest rates; (v) the effect of changes in the business cycle and downturns in the local, regional or national economies; and (vi) the Risk Factors identified in Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2018
and in other filings made by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, even if subsequently made available by the Company on its website or otherwise. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise these statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
28
Table of Contents
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
EARNINGS SUMMARY
Comparison of the and
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
and
2018
Summary Results
Net income for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
was
$3,944,000
compared to
$3,208,000
for the same period of
2018
, including the effects of an increase in after-tax securities gains of $84,000 (from a loss of $32,000 to a gain of $52,000) for the three month periods. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
was
$0.84
compared to
$0.68
for the corresponding period of 2018. Return on average assets and return on average equity were
0.95%
and
10.93%
for the three months ended
March 31, 2019
compared to
0.86%
and
9.18%
for the corresponding period of
2018
. Net income from core operations (“adjusted earnings”) was
$3,892,000
for the three months ended
March 31, 2019
compared to
$3,240,000
for the corresponding period of
2018
. Basic and diluted adjusted earnings per share for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
were
$0.83
compared to
$0.69
basic and diluted for the corresponding period of
2018
.
Management uses the non-GAAP measure of net income from core operations, or adjusted earnings, in its analysis of the Company’s performance. This measure, as used by the Company, adjusts net income by excluding significant gains or losses that are unusual in nature. Because certain of these items and their impact on the Company’s performance are difficult to predict, management believes the presentation of financial measures excluding the impact of such items provides useful supplemental information in evaluating the operating results of the Company’s core businesses. For purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, net income from core operations, or adjusted earnings, means net income adjusted to exclude after-tax net securities gains or losses and bank-owned life insurance gains on death benefit. These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for net income determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies.
Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
Three Months Ended March 31,
2019
2018
GAAP net income
$
3,944
$
3,208
Less: net securities (losses) gains, net of tax
52
(32
)
Non-GAAP adjusted earnings
$
3,892
$
3,240
Three Months Ended March 31,
2019
2018
Return on average assets (ROA)
0.95
%
0.86
%
Less: net securities (losses) gains, net of tax
0.01
%
(0.01
)%
Non-GAAP adjusted ROA
0.94
%
0.87
%
Three Months Ended March 31,
2019
2018
Return on average equity (ROE)
10.93
%
9.18
%
Less: net securities (losses) gains, net of tax
0.14
%
(0.09
)%
Non-GAAP adjusted ROE
10.79
%
9.27
%
Three Months Ended March 31,
2019
2018
Basic earnings per share (EPS)
$
0.84
$
0.68
Less: net securities (losses) gains, net of tax
0.01
(0.01
)
Non-GAAP basic operating EPS
$
0.83
$
0.69
29
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31,
2019
2018
Diluted EPS
$
0.84
$
0.68
Less: net securities (losses) gains, net of tax
0.01
(0.01
)
Non-GAAP diluted operating EPS
$
0.83
$
0.69
Interest and Dividend Income
Interest and dividend income for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
increased to
$16,434,000
compared to
$13,201,000
for the same period of
2018
. Loan portfolio income increased due to the impact of portfolio growth, primarily in consumer automobile lending and commercial real estate mortgages. Investment securities income increased by $557,000 for the three month period ended March 31, 2019 to $1,565,000 as the average balance of the investment portfolio increased by $26,317,000.
Interest and dividend income composition for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
was as follows:
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2019
March 31, 2018
Change
(In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount
%
Loans including fees
$
14,869
90.48
%
$
12,193
92.36
%
$
2,676
21.95
%
Investment securities:
Taxable
934
5.68
546
4.14
388
71.06
Tax-exempt
174
1.06
241
1.83
(67
)
(27.80
)
Dividend and other interest income
457
2.78
221
1.67
236
106.79
Total interest and dividend income
$
16,434
100.00
%
$
13,201
100.00
%
$
3,233
24.49
%
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
increased
$1,708,000
to
$3,756,000
compared to
$2,048,000
for the same period of
2018
. The increase in interest expense is the result of growth within the deposit portfolio and the lengthening of the time deposit portfolio as part of a strategy to build balance sheet protection in a rising rate environment. In addition, short and long-term borrowings have been utilized to assist with the funding of the loan portfolio growth.
Interest expense composition for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
was as follows:
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2019
March 31, 2018
Change
(In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount
%
Deposits
$
2,300
61.23
%
$
1,222
59.67
%
$
1,078
88.22
%
Short-term borrowings
605
16.11
224
10.94
381
170.09
Long-term borrowings
851
22.66
602
29.39
249
41.36
Total interest expense
$
3,756
100.00
%
$
2,048
100.00
%
$
1,708
83.40
%
Net Interest Margin
The net interest margin (“NIM”) for the three and
three months ended March 31, 2019
was
3.37%
compared to
3.31%
for the corresponding period of
2018
. The increase in the net interest margin was driven by an increase in the yield on earning assets of 45 basis points ("bps") for the three month period. The impact of the increase in yield on earning assets was limited by the increase in rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities of 48 bps for the three month period. The increase in the yield on earning assets was driven by an increase in the loan portfolio yield in conjunction with an increase in the average loan portfolio of $122.5 million. The loan growth was primarily funded by an increase in average total deposits of $96.7 million along with growth in average total borrowings of $63.9 million for the three month period. Core deposits represent a lower cost funding source than time deposits and comprise 75.62% of total deposits at
March 31, 2019
compared to 79.34% at
March 31, 2018
. Limiting the positive impact on the net interest margin caused by the growth in core deposits was the lengthening of the time deposit portfolio.
30
Table of Contents
The following is a schedule of average balances and associated yields for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
:
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES
Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Three Months Ended March 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Average Balance (1)
Interest
Average Rate
Average Balance (1)
Interest
Average Rate
Assets:
Tax-exempt loans
(3)
$
72,714
$
539
3.01
%
$
75,448
$
567
3.05
%
All other loans
1,311,315
14,443
4.47
%
1,186,117
11,745
4.02
%
Total loans
(2)
1,384,029
14,982
4.39
%
1,261,565
12,312
3.96
%
Taxable securities
126,033
1,350
4.28
%
84,267
759
3.60
%
Tax-exempt securities
(3)
26,711
220
3.29
%
42,160
305
2.89
%
Total securities
152,744
1,570
4.11
%
126,427
1,064
3.37
%
Interest-bearing deposits
6,534
41
2.54
%
2,167
8
1.50
%
Total interest-earning assets
1,543,307
16,593
4.35
%
1,390,159
13,384
3.90
%
Other assets
111,600
97,606
Total assets
$
1,654,907
$
1,487,765
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Savings
$
166,927
30
0.07
%
$
163,037
16
0.04
%
Super Now deposits
231,508
379
0.66
%
227,086
207
0.37
%
Money market deposits
241,402
472
0.79
%
236,443
210
0.36
%
Time deposits
299,644
1,419
1.92
%
236,116
789
1.36
%
Total interest-bearing deposits
939,481
2,300
0.99
%
862,682
1,222
0.57
%
Short-term borrowings
96,029
605
2.56
%
61,803
224
1.45
%
Long-term borrowings
144,191
851
2.23
%
114,526
602
2.10
%
Total borrowings
240,220
1,456
2.36
%
176,329
826
1.87
%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
1,179,701
3,756
1.27
%
1,039,011
2,048
0.79
%
Demand deposits
313,112
293,227
Other liabilities
17,776
15,786
Shareholders’ equity
144,318
139,741
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
1,654,907
$
1,487,765
Interest rate spread
3.08
%
3.11
%
Net interest income/margin
$
12,837
3.37
%
$
11,336
3.31
%
1.
Information on this table has been calculated using average daily balance sheets to obtain average balances.
2.
Non-accrual loans have been included with loans for the purpose of analyzing net interest earnings.
3.
Income and rates on a fully taxable equivalent basis include an adjustment for the difference between annual income from tax-exempt obligations and the taxable equivalent of such income at the standard tax rate of 21%.
The following table presents the adjustment to convert net interest income to net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
:
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
2019
2018
Total interest income
$
16,434
$
13,201
Total interest expense
3,756
2,048
Net interest income
12,678
11,153
Tax equivalent adjustment
159
183
Net interest income (fully taxable equivalent)
$
12,837
$
11,336
31
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the respective impact that both volume and rate changes have had on net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
:
Three Months Ended March 31,
2019 vs. 2018
Increase (Decrease) Due to
(In Thousands)
Volume
Rate
Net
Interest income:
Tax-exempt loans
$
(20
)
$
(8
)
$
(28
)
All other loans
1,309
1,389
2,698
Taxable investment securities
418
173
591
Tax-exempt investment securities
(191
)
106
(85
)
Interest bearing deposits
32
1
33
Total interest-earning assets
1,548
1,661
3,209
Interest expense:
Savings deposits
1
13
14
Super Now deposits
4
168
172
Money market deposits
5
257
262
Time deposits
247
383
630
Short-term borrowings
160
221
381
Long-term borrowings
202
47
249
Total interest-bearing liabilities
619
1,089
1,708
Change in net interest income
$
929
$
572
$
1,501
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s quarterly review of the loan portfolio. The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans, analyze delinquencies, ascertain loan growth, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess general economic conditions in the markets served. An external independent loan review is also performed annually for the Banks. Management remains committed to an aggressive program of problem loan identification and resolution.
The allowance for loan losses is determined by applying loss factors to outstanding loans by type, excluding loans for which a specific allowance has been determined. Loss factors are based on management’s consideration of the nature of the portfolio segments, changes in mix and volume of the loan portfolio, and historical loan loss experience. In addition, management considers industry standards and trends with respect to non-performing loans and its knowledge and experience with specific lending segments.
Although management believes it uses the best information available to make such determinations and that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at
March 31, 2019
, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations. A downturn in the local economy, increased unemployment, and delays in receiving financial information from borrowers could result in increased levels of nonperforming assets, charge-offs, loan loss provisions, and reductions in income. Additionally, as an integral part of the examination process, bank regulatory agencies periodically review the Banks' loan loss allowance. The banking agencies could require the recognition of additions to the loan loss allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.
When determining the appropriate allowance level, management has attributed the allowance for loan losses to various portfolio segments; however, the allowance is available for the entire portfolio as needed.
The allowance for loan losses decreased slightly from
$13,837,000
at
December 31, 2018
to
$13,792,000
at
March 31, 2019
. The slight decrease in the allowance for loan losses was driven by a decrease in the commercial real estate segment of the loan portfolio. The majority of the loans charged-off during the three month period had a specific allowance within the allowance for losses. At
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, the allowance for loan losses to total loans was
1.00%
and
1.00%
, respectively.
32
Table of Contents
The provision for loan losses totaled
$360,000
for
three months ended March 31, 2019
and the respective amount for the corresponding 2018 period was
$160,000
. The increase in the provision for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2019 compared to the same period of 2018 was primarily due to an increase in net charge-offs.
Nonperforming loans increased to
$15,794,000
at
March 31, 2019
from
$7,641,000
at
March 31, 2018
. The majority of nonperforming loans are centered on loans that are either in a secured position and have sureties with a strong underlying financial position or have a specific allocation for any impairment recorded within the allowance for loan losses. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans was
1.14%
and
0.60%
at
March 31, 2019
and
2018
, respectively, and the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans was
87.32%
and
167.99%
at
March 31, 2019
and
2018
, respectively. Internal loan review and analysis coupled with loan growth dictated a provision for loan losses of
$360,000
for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
.
The following is a table showing total nonperforming loans as of:
Total Nonperforming Loans
(In Thousands)
90 Days Past Due
Non-accrual
Total
March 31, 2019
$
1,268
$
14,526
$
15,794
December 31, 2018
1,274
15,298
16,572
September 30, 2018
512
8,227
8,739
June 30, 2018
463
6,669
7,132
March 31, 2018
446
7,195
7,641
Non-interest Income
Total non-interest income for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
compared to the same period in
2018
increased
$173,000
to
$2,254,000
. Excluding net securities gains, non-interest income for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
increased
$67,000
compared to the same period in
2018
. The increase in gain on sale of loans was driven by an increase in volume. The changes in insurance and brokerage commissions are due to a change in the product mix of consumer purchases. The fluctuation in other income consists primarily due to increases in loans sold on the secondary market.
Non-interest income composition for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
was as follows:
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2019
March 31, 2018
Change
(In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount
%
Service charges
$
562
24.94
%
$
551
26.48
%
$
11
2.00
%
Net debt securities gains (losses), available for sale
13
0.58
(9
)
(0.43
)
22
(244.44
)
Net equity securities gains (losses)
43
1.91
(34
)
(1.63
)
77
(100.00
)
Net securities gains, trading
10
0.44
3
0.14
7
100.00
Bank-owned life insurance
168
7.45
173
8.31
(5
)
(2.89
)
Gain on sale of loans
316
14.02
255
12.25
61
23.92
Insurance commissions
134
5.94
117
5.62
17
14.53
Brokerage commissions
323
14.33
343
16.48
(20
)
(5.83
)
Debit card fees
310
13.75
333
16.00
(23
)
(6.91
)
Other
375
16.64
349
16.78
26
7.45
Total non-interest income
$
2,254
100.00
%
$
2,081
100.00
%
$
173
8.31
%
Non-interest Expense
Total non-interest expense increased
$537,000
for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
compared to the same period of
2018
.
The increase in salaries and employee benefits is primarily attributable to routine wage increases coupled with an increase in the number of employees. Occupancy expense increased primarily due to costs associated with consolidating two branches into a new branch location and various maintenance projects to refresh facilities. Software amortization increased due to updating software programs that require new licensing fee structures. Marketing expenses decreased as targeted marketing has decreased in the localities where branches opened during 2018. The fluctuation in professional fees consists primarily of a decrease in consulting fees.
33
Table of Contents
Non-interest expense composition for the
three
months ended
March 31, 2019
and
2018
was as follows:
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2019
March 31, 2018
Change
(In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount
%
Salaries and employee benefits
$
5,501
56.05
%
$
5,048
54.41
%
$
453
8.97
%
Occupancy
779
7.94
741
7.99
38
5.13
Furniture and equipment
752
7.66
747
8.05
5
0.67
Software amortization
207
2.11
65
0.70
142
218.46
Pennsylvania shares tax
293
2.99
277
2.99
16
5.78
Professional fees
522
5.32
566
6.10
(44
)
(7.77
)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance
268
2.73
202
2.18
66
32.67
Marketing
102
1.04
251
2.71
(149
)
(59.36
)
Intangible amortization
71
0.72
80
0.86
(9
)
(11.25
)
Other
1,319
13.44
1,300
14.01
19
1.46
Total non-interest expense
$
9,814
100.00
%
$
9,277
100.00
%
$
537
5.79
%
Provision for Income Taxes
Income taxes increased
$223,000
for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
compared to the same period of
2018
. The effective tax rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
was 17.07% compared to 15.51% for the same period of
2018
. The increase in effective tax rate is primarily due to a slight decrease in tax exempt income for the period end March 31, 2019. The Company currently is in a deferred tax asset position. Management has reviewed the deferred tax asset and has determined that the asset will be utilized within the appropriate carry forward period and therefore does not require a valuation allowance.
ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents
increased
$6,854,000
from
$66,742,000
at
December 31, 2018
to
$73,596,000
at
March 31, 2019
, primarily as a result of the following activities during the
three months ended March 31, 2019
.
Loans Held for Sale
Activity regarding loans held for sale resulted in sales proceeds trailing loan originations, less
$316,000
in realized gains, by $
1,142,000
for the
three months ended March 31, 2019
.
Loans
Gross loans decreased
$287,000
since
December 31, 2018
due primarily to a decrease across all three real estate mortgage categories. The decrease in the real estate mortgage portfolio was partially offset by the growth in commercial, financial, and agricultural along with the consumer automobile loan segment.
34
Table of Contents
The allocation of the loan portfolio, by category, as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
is presented below:
March 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Change
(In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount
%
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
$
194,917
14.08
%
$
188,561
13.62
%
$
6,356
3.37
%
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
618,559
44.68
622,379
44.94
(3,820
)
(0.61
)%
Commercial
367,089
26.51
371,695
26.84
(4,606
)
(1.24
)%
Construction
39,281
2.84
43,523
3.14
(4,242
)
(9.75
)%
Consumer automobile loans
139,837
10.10
133,183
9.63
6,654
5.00
%
Other consumer installment loans
23,841
1.72
24,552
1.77
(711
)
(2.90
)%
Net deferred loan fees and discounts
946
0.07
864
0.06
82
9.49
%
Gross loans
$
1,384,470
100.00
%
$
1,384,757
100.00
%
$
(287
)
(0.02
)%
The following table shows the amount of accrual and non-accrual TDRs at
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
:
March 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Accrual
Non-accrual
Total
Accrual
Non-accrual
Total
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
$
—
$
1,121
$
1,121
$
—
$
1,127
$
1,127
Real estate mortgage:
Residential
2,208
157
2,365
2,225
159
2,384
Commercial
3,236
2,114
5,350
3,959
2,129
6,088
$
5,444
$
3,392
$
8,836
$
6,184
$
3,415
$
9,599
Investments
The fair value of the investment debt securities portfolio at
March 31, 2019
increased
$7,477,000
since
December 31, 2018
while the amortized cost of the portfolio
increased
$5,506,000
. The growth in the investment portfolio has occurred within the municipal segment as bonds with a final maturity of inside of ten years have been purchased. The portfolio continues to be actively managed in order to reduce interest rate and market risk. The unrealized losses within the debt securities portfolio are the result of market activity, not credit issues/ratings, as approximately
79.05%
of the debt securities portfolio on an amortized cost basis is currently rated A or higher by either S&P or Moody’s.
The Company considers various factors, which include examples from applicable accounting guidance, when analyzing the available for sale portfolio for possible other than temporary impairment. The Company primarily considers the following factors in its analysis: length of time and severity of the fair value being less than carrying value; reduction of dividend paid (equities); continued payment of dividend/interest, credit rating, and financial condition of an issuer; intent and ability to hold until anticipated recovery (which may be maturity); and general outlook for the economy, specific industry, and entity in question.
The bond portion of the portfolio review is conducted with emphases on several factors. Continued payment of principal and interest is given primary importance with credit rating and financial condition of the issuer following as the next most important. Credit ratings were reviewed with the ratings of the bonds being satisfactory. Bonds that were not currently rated were discussed with a third party and/or underwent an internal financial review. The Company also monitors whether each of the investments incurred a decline in fair value from carrying value of at least 20% for twelve consecutive months or a similar decline of at least 50% for three consecutive months. Each bond is reviewed to determine whether it is a general obligation bond, which is backed by the credit and taxing power of the issuing jurisdiction, or a revenue bond, which is only payable from specified revenues. Based on the review undertaken by the Company, the Company determined that the decline in value of the various bond holdings were temporary and were the result of the general market downturns and interest rate/yield curve changes, not credit issues. The fact that almost all of such bonds are general obligation bonds further solidified the Company’s determination that the decline in the value of these bond holdings is temporary.
The fair value of the equity portfolio continues to fluctuate as the economic and political environment continues to impact stock pricing. The amortized cost of the available for sale equity securities portfolio has
remained flat
at
$1,628,000
for
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
while the fair value
increased
$43,000
over the same time period.
35
Table of Contents
The distribution of credit ratings by amortized cost and fair values for the debt security portfolio at
March 31, 2019
follows:
A- to AAA
B- to BBB+
Not Rated
Total
(In Thousands)
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Amortized Cost
Fair Value
Available for sale (AFS):
Mortgage-backed securities
$
6,120
$
5,980
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
6,120
$
5,980
State and political securities
83,263
84,803
2,123
2,085
70
70
85,456
86,958
Other debt securities
22,480
21,899
19,173
18,915
8,284
8,010
49,937
48,824
Total debt securities AFS
$
111,863
$
112,682
$
21,296
$
21,000
$
8,354
$
8,080
$
141,513
$
141,762
Financing Activities
Deposits
Total deposits increased
$89,158,000
from
December 31, 2018
to
March 31, 2019
. The increase in core deposits (deposits less time deposits) has provided relationship driven funding for the loan and investment portfolios. While deposit gathering efforts have centered on core deposits, the lengthening of the time deposit portfolio is moving forward as part of the strategy to build balance sheet protection in a rising rate environment. The increase in deposits is the result of our focus on building relationships, not by offering market leading rates.
Deposit balances and their changes for the periods being discussed follow:
March 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Change
(In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount
%
Demand deposits
$
321,657
24.57
%
$
320,814
26.30
%
$
843
0.26
%
NOW accounts
253,475
19.36
207,819
17.04
45,656
21.97
Money market deposits
244,753
18.70
238,596
19.56
6,157
2.58
Savings deposits
170,005
12.99
166,063
13.61
3,942
2.37
Time deposits
319,171
24.38
286,611
23.49
32,560
11.36
Total deposits
$
1,309,061
100.00
%
$
1,219,903
100.00
%
$
89,158
7.31
%
Borrowed Funds
Total borrowed funds decreased
25.32%
, or
$77,677,000
, to
$229,130,000
at
March 31, 2019
compared to
$306,807,000
at
December 31, 2018
. The decrease in total borrowing occurred due to the strong growth in deposits as a funding source as the loan portfolio remained flat. The long-term borrowings originating during the three months ended March 31, 2019 have a blended interest rate of 2.94% and mature by 2024.
March 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Change
(In Thousands)
Amount
% Total
Amount
% Total
Amount
%
Short-term borrowings:
FHLB repurchase agreements
$
78,206
34.13
%
$
162,203
52.87
%
$
(83,997
)
(51.79
)%
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
6,293
2.75
5,662
1.85
631
11.14
Total short-term borrowings
84,499
36.88
167,865
54.72
(83,366
)
(49.66
)
Long-term borrowings:
Long-term FHLB borrowings
138,625
60.50
138,625
45.18
—
—
Long-term finance lease
6,006
2.62
—
—
6,006
n/a
Long-term capital lease
—
—
317
0.10
(317
)
(100.00
)
Total long-term borrowings
144,631
63.12
138,942
45.28
5,689
4.09
Total borrowed funds
$
229,130
100.00
%
$
306,807
100.00
%
$
(77,677
)
(25.32
)%
36
Table of Contents
Short-Term Borrowings
The following table provides further information in regards to secured borrowings that have been accounted for as repurchase agreements.
Remaining Contractual Maturity Overnight and Continuous
(In Thousands)
March 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
Investment debt securities pledged, fair value
$
8,364
$
8,380
Repurchase agreements
6,294
5,662
Capital
The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed on an ongoing basis with reference to the size, composition, and quality of the Company’s resources and regulatory guidelines. Management seeks to maintain a level of capital sufficient to support existing assets and anticipated asset growth, maintain favorable access to capital markets, and preserve high quality credit ratings.
Bank holding companies are required to comply with the Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital guidelines. The risk-based capital rules are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets. Specifically, each is required to maintain certain minimum dollar amounts and ratios of common equity tier I risk-based, tier I risk-based, total risk-based, and tier I leverage capital. In addition to the capital requirements, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvements Act ("FDICIA") established five capital categories for banks ranging from “well capitalized” to “critically undercapitalized” for purposes of the FDIC's prompt corrective action rules. To be classified as “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action rules, common equity tier I risk-based, tier I risked-based, total risk-based, and tier I leverage capital ratios must be at least 6.5%, 8%, 10%, and 5%, respectively.
In July 2013, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted revisions to the agencies’ capital rules, which were designed to enhance such requirements and implement the revised standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly referred to as Basel III. Under existing capital rules, the minimum capital to risk-adjusted assets requirements for banking organizations, are a common equity tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% (6.5% to be considered “well capitalized”), a tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0% (8.0% to be considered “well capitalized”), and total capital ratio of 8.0% (10.0% to be considered “well capitalized”). Under existing capital rules, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions (including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers), a banking organization must hold a capital conservation buffer comprised of common equity tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements in an amount greater than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets. The capital contribution buffer requirements phased in over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2016.
37
Table of Contents
The Company's capital ratios as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
were as follows:
March 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual
$
134,489
10.245
%
$
132,543
10.178
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
59,073
4.500
58,601
4.500
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
91,891
7.000
83,018
6.375
To Be Well Capitalized
85,327
6.500
84,646
6.500
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual
$
145,024
11.048
%
$
142,876
10.972
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
105,014
8.000
104,175
8.000
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
137,831
10.500
128,591
9.875
To Be Well Capitalized
131,267
10.000
130,219
10.000
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual
$
134,489
10.245
%
$
132,543
10.178
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
78,764
6.000
78,135
6.000
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
111,582
8.500
102,552
7.875
To Be Well Capitalized
105,018
8.000
104,180
8.000
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Actual
$
134,489
8.206
%
$
132,543
8.176
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
65,556
4.000
64,845
4.000
To Be Well Capitalized
81,946
5.000
81,056
5.000
Jersey Shore State Bank's capital ratios as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
were as follows:
March 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual
$
95,218
9.963
%
$
94,105
9.879
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
43,007
4.500
42,866
4.500
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
66,900
7.000
60,727
6.375
To Be Well Capitalized
62,122
6.500
61,917
6.500
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual
$
103,640
10.844
%
$
102,534
10.764
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
76,459
8.000
76,205
8.000
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
100,352
10.500
94,066
9.875
To Be Well Capitalized
95,574
10.000
95,256
10.000
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
-
Actual
$
95,218
9.963
%
$
94,105
9.879
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
57,343
6.000
57,155
6.000
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
81,236
8.500
75,015
7.875
To Be Well Capitalized
76,457
8.000
76,206
8.000
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Actual
$
95,218
7.726
%
$
94,105
7.724
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
49,297
4.000
48,734
4.000
To Be Well Capitalized
61,622
5.000
60,917
5.000
38
Table of Contents
Luzerne Bank's capital ratios as of
March 31, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
were as follows:
March 31, 2019
December 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual
$
36,251
10.057
%
$
35,378
10.061
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
16,220
4.500
15,824
4.500
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
25,232
7.000
22,417
6.375
To Be Well Capitalized
23,430
6.500
22,856
6.500
Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual
$
38,364
10.644
%
$
37,283
10.603
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
28,834
8.000
28,130
8.000
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
37,845
10.500
34,723
9.875
To Be Well Capitalized
36,043
10.000
35,163
10.000
Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
Actual
$
36,251
10.057
%
$
35,378
10.061
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
21,627
6.000
21,098
6.000
Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
30,639
8.500
27,691
7.875
To Be Well Capitalized
28,836
8.000
28,131
8.000
Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
Actual
$
36,251
8.635
%
$
35,378
8.655
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
16,793
4.000
16,350
4.000
To Be Well Capitalized
20,991
5.000
20,438
5.000
Liquidity; Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk
The asset/liability committee addresses the liquidity needs of the Company to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet credit demands and deposit withdrawals as well as to the placement of available funds in the investment portfolio. In assessing liquidity requirements, equal consideration is given to the current position as well as the future outlook.
The following liquidity measures are monitored for compliance and were within the limits cited, except for net loans to total deposits, at
March 31, 2019
:
1.
Net Loans to Total Assets, 85% maximum
2.
Net Loans to Total Deposits, 100% maximum
3.
Cumulative 90 day Maturity GAP %, +/- 20% maximum
4.
Cumulative 1 Year Maturity GAP %, +/- 25% maximum
Fundamental objectives of the Company’s asset/liability management process are to maintain adequate liquidity while minimizing interest rate risk. The maintenance of adequate liquidity provides the Company with the ability to meet its financial obligations to depositors, loan customers, and shareholders. Additionally, it provides funds for normal operating expenditures and business opportunities as they arise. The objective of interest rate sensitivity management is to increase net interest income by managing interest sensitive assets and liabilities in such a way that they can be repriced in response to changes in market interest rates.
The Banks, like other financial institutions, must have sufficient funds available to meet liquidity needs for deposit withdrawals, loan commitments and originations, and expenses. In order to control cash flow, the Banks estimate future cash flows from deposits, loan payments, and investment security payments. The primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and investment securities, FHLB borrowings, and brokered deposits. Management believes the Banks have adequate resources to meet their normal funding requirements.
Management monitors the Company’s liquidity on both a long and short-term basis, thereby providing management necessary information to react to current balance sheet trends. Cash flow needs are assessed and sources of funds are determined. Funding strategies consider both customer needs and economical cost. Both short and long-term funding needs are addressed by maturities
39
Table of Contents
and sales of available for sale and trading investment securities, loan repayments and maturities, and liquidating money market investments such as federal funds sold. The use of these resources, in conjunction with access to credit, provides core funding to satisfy depositor, borrower, and creditor needs.
Management monitors and determines the desirable level of liquidity. Consideration is given to loan demand, investment opportunities, deposit pricing and growth potential, as well as the current cost of borrowing funds. The Company has a total current maximum borrowing capacity at the FHLB of
$592,778,000
. In addition to this credit arrangement, the Company has additional lines of credit with correspondent banks of
$57,000,000
. Management believes it has sufficient liquidity to satisfy estimated short-term and long-term funding needs. FHLB borrowings totaled
$216,831,000
as of
March 31, 2019
.
Interest rate sensitivity, which is closely related to liquidity management, is a function of the repricing characteristics of the Company’s portfolio of assets and liabilities. Asset/liability management strives to match maturities and rates between loan and investment security assets with the deposit liabilities and borrowings that fund them. Successful asset/liability management results in a balance sheet structure which can cope effectively with market rate fluctuations. The matching process segments both assets and liabilities into future time periods (usually 12 months, or less) based upon when repricing can be effected. Repriceable assets are subtracted from repriceable liabilities for a specific time period to determine the “gap”, or difference. Once known, the gap is managed based on predictions about future market interest rates. Intentional mismatching, or gapping, can enhance net interest income if market rates move as predicted. However, if market rates behave in a manner contrary to predictions, net interest income will suffer. Gaps, therefore, contain an element of risk and must be prudently managed. In addition to gap management, the Company has an asset/liability management policy which incorporates a market value at risk calculation which is used to determine the effects of interest rate movements on shareholders’ equity and a simulation analysis to monitor the effects of interest rate changes on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
The Company currently maintains a gap position of being asset sensitive. The Company has strategically taken this position as it has decreased the duration of the earning asset portfolio by adding quality short and intermediate term loans such as home equity loans and the selling of long-term municipal bonds. Lengthening of the liability portfolio is being undertaken to build protection in a rising rate environment.
A market value at risk calculation is utilized to monitor the effects of interest rate changes on the Company’s balance sheet and more specifically shareholders’ equity. The Company does not manage the balance sheet structure in order to maintain compliance with this calculation. The calculation serves as a guideline with greater emphasis placed on interest rate sensitivity. Changes to calculation results from period to period are reviewed as changes in results could be a signal of future events. As of the most recent analysis, the results of the market value at risk calculation were within established guidelines due to the strategic direction being taken.
Interest Rate Sensitivity
In this analysis the Company examines the result of a 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis point change in market interest rates and the effect on net interest income. It is assumed that the change is instantaneous and that all rates move in a parallel manner. Assumptions are also made concerning prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage securities.
The following is a rate shock forecast for the twelve month period ending
March 31,
2020
assuming a static balance sheet as of
March 31, 2019
.
Parallel Rate Shock in Basis Points
(In Thousands)
-200
-100
Static
+100
+200
+300
+400
Net interest income
$
49,753
$
52,634
$
54,735
$
56,577
$
58,300
$
59,846
$
61,444
Change from static
(4,982
)
(2,101
)
—
1,842
3,565
5,111
6,709
Percent change from static
-9.10
%
-3.84
%
—
3.37
%
6.51
%
9.34
%
12.26
%
The model utilized to create the report presented above makes various estimates at each level of interest rate change regarding cash flow from principal repayment on loans and mortgage-backed securities and/or call activity on investment securities. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates which would result in significant differences in the calculated projected change. In addition, the limits stated above do not necessarily represent the level of change under which management would undertake specific measures to realign its portfolio in order to reduce the projected level of change. Generally, management believes the Company is well positioned to respond expeditiously when the market interest rate outlook changes.
40
Table of Contents
Inflation
The asset and liability structure of a financial institution is primarily monetary in nature. Therefore, interest rates rather than inflation have a more significant impact on the Company’s performance. Interest rates are not always affected in the same direction or magnitude as prices of other goods and services, but are reflective of fiscal policy initiatives or economic factors which are not measured by a price index.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk for the Company is comprised primarily of interest rate risk exposure and liquidity risk. Interest rate risk and liquidity risk management is performed at both the level of the Company and the Banks. The Company’s interest rate sensitivity is monitored by management through selected interest rate risk measures produced by an independent third party. There have been no substantial changes in the Company’s gap analysis or simulation analysis compared to the information provided in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2018
. Additional information and details are provided in the “Liquidity, Interest Rate Sensitivity, and Market Risk” section of “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”
Generally, management believes the Company is well positioned to respond in a timely manner when the market interest rate outlook changes.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An analysis was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of
March 31, 2019
.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
March 31, 2019
that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
41
Table of Contents
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2018
. Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s business.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides certain information with respect to the Company's repurchase of common stock during the quarter ended
March 31, 2019
.
Period
Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units) Purchased
Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or Units) Purchased
Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value)
of Shares (or Units) that
May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Month #1 (January 1 - January 31, 2019)
—
—
—
342,446
Month #2 (February 1 - February 28, 2019)
—
—
—
342,446
Month #3 (March 1 - March 31, 2019)
—
—
—
342,446
On
April 29, 2019
, the Board of Directors extended the previously approved authorization to repurchase up to
482,000
shares, or approximately
10%
, of the outstanding shares of the Company for an additional year to
April 30, 2020
. As of
March 31, 2019
there have been
139,554
shares repurchased under this plan.
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5.
Other Information
None.
42
Table of Contents
Item 6.
Exhibits
3(i)
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as presently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018).
3(ii)
Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
31(i)
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31(ii)
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32(i)
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
32(ii)
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
101
Interactive data file containing the following financial statements formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018; (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed “filed” or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 under the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.
43
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
(Registrant)
Date:
May 10, 2019
/s/ Richard A. Grafmyre
Richard A. Grafmyre, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:
May 10, 2019
/s/ Brian L. Knepp
Brian L. Knepp, President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer)
44
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit 3(i)
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as presently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018).
Exhibit 3(ii)
Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
Exhibit 31(i)
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31(ii)
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(i)
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32(ii)
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 101
Interactive data file containing the following financial statements formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018; (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed “filed” or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 under the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.
45