PotlatchDeltic - 10-Q quarterly report FY

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017

or

For the transition period from             to

Commission File Number 1-32729

POTLATCH CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(509) 835-1500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

The number of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of April 25, 2017 was 40,609,080.

POTLATCH CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

Table of Contents

Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Potlatch Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

Unaudited (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Potlatch Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

Unaudited (Dollars in thousands)

See Note 5: Derivative Instruments and Note 7: Pension and Other Postretirement Employee Benefits for additional information. Amortization of prior service credit and amortization of actuarial loss are included in the computation of net periodic cost (benefit).

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Potlatch Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

Unaudited (Dollars in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Potlatch Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Unaudited (Dollars in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

For purposes of this report, any reference to “Potlatch,” “the company,” “we,” “us” and “our” means Potlatch Corporation and all of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, except where the context indicates otherwise.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to interim financial statements; certain disclosures normally provided in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States have been omitted. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2017. We believe that all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of such interim periods have been included and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

NOTE 2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which changes several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions, including accounting for income taxes, diluted shares outstanding, classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, forfeitures and minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. We prospectively adopted the provisions of this ASU on January 1, 2017, which include recording the tax effects related to share-based payments through the income statement. As a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), we are generally not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes, except through our taxable REIT subsidiaries. Therefore, the adoption of this guidance was not material to our consolidated financial statements. We will continue to estimate forfeitures each period. We consider many factors when estimating expected forfeitures, including types of awards, employee class and historical experience.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Topic 606 (ASU No. 2014-09), which requires an entity to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also included other guidance, including the presentation of a gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset or a nonfinancial asset. Subsequent ASU’s have been issued that provide clarity, technical corrections and improvements to Topic 606. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) - Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year. ASU No. 2014-09 is effective for us on January 1, 2018. For most of our sales, which consist of logs, manufactured wood products, residual by-products and real estate, we expect there will be no change to the timing or amount of revenue recognized because our contracts are legally enforceable, the transaction price is fixed and performance is completed at a point in time, typically when risk of loss and title pass. We are continuing to assess the effect on our other sales, which include stumpage contracts, timber deeds, land use permits, royalties and carbon sequestration credits. We expect our expanded disclosures will disaggregate revenues along the lines of the sales categories mentioned above. The guidance permits a retrospective application of the new standard with certain practical expedients or retrospective application with a cumulative effect adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings. While we have not yet determined our transition method, the adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic 715), Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires an entity to present service cost within compensation expense and the other components of net benefit cost outside of income from operations. This ASU is effective for us on January 1, 2018. The amendments in this update require retrospective presentation in the income statement. Changes to the capitalized portion of both service cost and the other components of net benefit cost within inventory will be applied prospectively. In 2016, net periodic pension and other postretirement employee benefit cost reported within operating income totaled $15.7 million of which $6.5 million represented service cost.  

6

NOTE 3. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table reconciles the number of shares used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per share:

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, there were 81,440 and 90,272 stock-based awards that were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive. Anti-dilutive awards could be dilutive in future periods.

NOTE 4. CERTAIN BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

INVENTORIES

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

TIMBER AND TIMBERLANDS

7

NOTE 5. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

From time to time, we enter into derivative financial instruments to manage certain cash flow and fair value risks.

Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset or liability to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. We have five fair value interest rate swaps to convert interest payments on fixed-rate debt to variable-rate 3-month LIBOR plus a spread.

Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in the cash flows of a specific asset or liability that is attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered cash flow hedges. We have one interest rate swap to convert variable-rate debt, comprised of 3-month LIBOR plus a spread, to fixed-rate debt. Our cash flow hedge is expected to be highly effective in achieving offsetting cash flows attributable to the hedged interest rate risk through the term of the hedge. Therefore, changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income and will be recognized in earnings when the hedged interest rate affects earnings. The amounts paid or received on this interest rate hedge will be recognized as adjustments to interest expense. As of March 31, 2017, the amount of net loss expected to be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months is $0.1 million.

The following table presents the gross fair values of our interest rate contracts designated as hedging instruments on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:

The following table details the effect of derivatives on our Consolidated Statements of Income:

8

NOTE 6. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The following table presents the estimated fair values of our financial instruments:

¹      The carrying amount of long-term debt includes principal and unamortized discounts.

For cash and cash equivalents and revolving line of credit borrowings, the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

The fair value of the interest rate swaps was determined using discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. The analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate forward curves.

The fair value of our long-term debt is estimated based upon quoted market prices for similar debt issues or estimated based on average market prices for comparable debt when there is no quoted market price.

The contract value of our COLI, the amount at which it could be redeemed, is used to estimate fair value because market prices are not readily available.

NOTE 7. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

The following tables detail the components of net periodic cost (benefit) of our pension plans and other postretirement employee benefits (OPEB):

During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, we paid non-qualified supplemental pension benefits of $0.4 million and $0.4 million and OPEB benefits of $0.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively.

9

The following tables detail the pension and OPEB changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of tax:

NOTE 8. EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION

As of March 31, 2017, we had two stock incentive plans under which performance shares, restricted stock units (RSUs) and deferred compensation stock equivalent units were outstanding. These plans have received shareholder approval. We were originally authorized to issue up to 1.6 million shares and 1.0 million shares under our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and 2014 Stock Incentive Plan, respectively. At March 31, 2017, approximately 1.0 million shares were authorized for future use. We issue new shares of common stock to settle performance shares, restricted stock units and deferred compensation stock equivalent units.

The following table details equity-based compensation expense and the related income tax benefit:

10

PERFORMANCE SHARES

The following table presents the key inputs used in the Monte Carlo simulation to calculate the fair value of performance share awards in 2017 and 2016:

The following table summarizes outstanding performance share awards as of March 31, 2017, and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2017:

As of March 31, 2017, there was $6.7 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested performance share awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.

RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

The following table summarizes outstanding RSU awards as of March 31, 2017, and changes during the three months ended March 31, 2017:

The fair value of each RSU equaled our common share price on the date of grant. The total fair value of RSU awards that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2017 was de minimis. As of March 31, 2017, there was $2.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSU awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.9 years.

DEFERRED COMPENSATION STOCK EQUIVALENT UNITS

A long-term incentive award is granted annually to our directors and is payable upon a director's separation from service. Directors may also elect to defer their quarterly retainers, which may be payable in the form of stock. All stock unit equivalent accounts are credited with dividend equivalents. As of March 31, 2017, there were 134,832 shares outstanding that will be distributed in the future to directors as common stock.  

Issuance of restricted stock units awarded to certain officers and select employees may also be deferred.  All stock unit equivalent accounts are credited with dividend equivalents.  As of March 31, 2017, 72,718 RSUs have vested, but issuance of the related stock has been deferred.

11

NOTE 9. INCOME TAXES

As a real estate investment trust (REIT), we generally are not subject to federal and state corporate income taxes on income of the REIT that we distribute to our shareholders. We conduct certain activities through our taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRS), which are subject to corporate level federal and state income taxes. These taxable activities are principally comprised of our wood products manufacturing operations and certain real estate investments. Therefore, income tax expense or benefit is primarily due to income or loss of the TRS, as well as permanent book versus tax differences.

NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In January 2007, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) notified us that we are a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and the Clean Water Act for cleanup of a site known as Avery Landing in northern Idaho. We own a portion of the land at the Avery Landing site, which we acquired in 1980 from the Milwaukee Railroad. The land we own at the site and adjacent properties were contaminated with petroleum as a result of the Milwaukee Railroad's operations at the site prior to 1980. On July 5, 2011, the EPA issued an Action Memorandum for the Avery Landing Site selecting contaminant extraction and off-site disposal as the remedial alternative. On May 23, 2012, we signed a consent order with the EPA pursuant to which we agreed to provide $1.75 million in funding for EPA cleanup on a portion of our property (including the adjacent riverbank owned by the Idaho Department of Lands). The EPA cleanup was completed in October 2012. On April 4, 2013, the EPA issued a unilateral administrative order requiring us to remediate the portion of the Avery Landing site that we own. Our remediation was completed in October 2013. In 2016, the EPA confirmed that Potlatch had completed the cleanup and subsequent monitoring required by the unilateral order. On September 25, 2015, the EPA sent us a letter asserting that the EPA and the Department of Transportation (the current owner of a portion of the adjacent property remediated by the EPA) (DOT) had incurred $9.8 million in unreimbursed response costs associated with the site and that we were liable for such costs. We executed a tolling agreement with the EPA and DOT suspending the statute of limitations on the claim until September 2016 in order to facilitate negotiations of a final settlement and release. In September, the parties agreed to extend the tolling agreement through October 6, 2016. The tolling agreement was further extended through February 22, 2017 and in January 2017, the tolling agreement was extended through May 22, 2017, and the parties are in the process of negotiating a further extension. Settlement negotiations continue. If settlement efforts prove to be unsuccessful, we believe we have meritorious defenses to this claim and we intend to defend ourselves vigorously. We accrued $0.2 million for this matter in the first quarter of 2016 and an additional $0.8 million for this matter in the second quarter of 2016. It is reasonably possible that our liability may exceed our accrual by up to approximately $2 million. We have reserved all of our rights to seek reimbursement for the costs of remediation from all parties potentially responsible.

12

NOTE 11. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The following table summarizes information by business segment:

13

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Information

This report contains, in addition to historical information, certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including without limitation, effectiveness of the cash flow hedge, recognition of compensation costs relating to our performance shares and RSUs, real estate demand and pricing, log prices, lumber demand and prices, business conditions for our business segments, Resource segment results, Wood Products segment results, Real Estate segment results, 2017 capital spending, stock repurchase, expected harvest levels in 2017 and beyond and similar matters. Words such as “anticipate,” “expect,” “will,” “intend,” “plan,” “target,” “project,” “believe,” “seek,” “schedule,” “estimate,” “could,” “can,” “may” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect our current views regarding future events based on estimates and assumptions and are therefore subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. Our actual results of operations could differ materially from our historical results or those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements contained in this report. For a nonexclusive listing of forward-looking statements and potential factors affecting our business, refer to “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” on page 1 and “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Forward-looking statements contained in this report present our views only as of the date of this report. Except as required under applicable law, we do not intend to issue updates concerning any future revisions of our views to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report.

Results of Operations

Our business is organized into three business segments: Resource, Wood Products and Real Estate. Our Resource segment supplies our Wood Products segment with a portion of its wood fiber needs. These intersegment revenues are based on prevailing market prices and represent a portion of the Resource segment’s total revenues. Our other segments generally do not generate intersegment revenues.

In our discussions of consolidated results of operations, our revenues are reported after elimination of intersegment revenues. In our discussion by business segment, each segment's revenues are presented before the elimination of intersegment revenues.

The operating results of our Resource, Wood Products and Real Estate business segments have been and will continue to be influenced by a variety of factors, including cyclical fluctuations in the forest products industry, changes in timber prices and in harvest levels from our timberlands, weather conditions, competition, timberland valuations, demand for our non-strategic timberland for higher and better use purposes, changes in lumber prices, the efficiency and level of capacity utilization of our wood products manufacturing operations, changes in our principal expenses such as log costs, asset dispositions or acquisitions and other factors.

Overview

All three of our business segments contributed to our strong results for the first quarter of 2017. Higher sawlog prices in Resource and higher lumber prices in Wood Products drove higher operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared with the same period last year. The increase in lumber prices was the result of anticipated duties in the Canadian lumber trade case and strong demand from the U.S. housing and repair and remodel markets. In addition, our Real Estate segment completed a large conservation sale in Alabama in the first quarter of 2017.

14

Consolidated Results

The following table sets forth changes in our Consolidated Statements of Income. Our Business Segment Results provide a more detailed discussion of our segments.

* Percentage change not meaningful.

Revenues

Revenues increased $21.8 million primarily due to increased lumber sales prices and shipments and a large conservation real estate sale. Lower harvest volumes in the first quarter of 2017 were due to the sale of central Idaho timberlands in the second quarter of 2016, which were more than offset by higher sawlog prices.

Cost of goods sold

Cost of goods sold increased 3% due to higher lumber shipments and the geographic mix of real estate sold, partially offset by lower depletion rates resulting from the sale of central Idaho timberlands in the second quarter of 2016.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were comparable with the prior year.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense decreased due to the 2016 repayment of $42.6 million in Minnesota revenue bonds and the refinancing of $65.7 million in Idaho revenue bonds.

Income tax provision

Income taxes are primarily due to income or loss from our taxable REIT subsidiaries (TRS). For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the income tax provision of $2.0 million was the result of the TRS’s income before income tax of $5.8 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the income tax benefit of $1.1 million was the result of the TRS’s loss before income taxes of $2.1 million and permanent book versus tax differences.

15

Business Segment Results

Resource Segment

16

Revenues

Resource segment revenues increased 6% in the first quarter of 2017, compared with the same period last year, resulting primarily from higher cedar sawlog prices and cedar being a higher percentage of the volume mix in the Northern region. Total harvest volumes decreased 5%, which was primarily the result of the sale of central Idaho timberlands in the second quarter of 2016.

Harvest volumes in our Southern region decreased 4% in the first quarter of 2017 due to lower planned harvest volumes, which included reduced stumpage sales. Southern sawlog prices increased 3% while pulpwood prices were 3% lower due to high pulp mill inventories. Stumpage prices fluctuate based on the mix of pulpwood and sawlog volumes and the mix of hardwood and softwood.

Cost of Goods Sold

Decreased harvest volumes from the sale of central Idaho timberlands resulted in lower depletion and amortization. Higher diesel prices and higher snow removal costs increased per ton logging and hauling costs.

Wood Products Segment

* Percentage change not meaningful.

Revenues

Revenues increased $12.4 million due to higher lumber shipments and higher lumber sales prices.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold fluctuated based on the following factors:

17

Real Estate Segment

During the first quarter of 2017, we sold an additional 3,092 acres compared with the same time last year mostly as a result of a large conservation sale in Alabama. The average price per acre fluctuates based on both the geographic area of the real estate and product mix.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

At March 31, 2017, our financial highlights included:

Net Cash from Operations

Net cash provided from operating activities was $41.9 million in the first quarter of 2017, compared with $28.9 million in the first quarter of 2016. The increase of $13.0 million was primarily the result of the following:

Partially offsetting the increases in 2017 were:

Net Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used for investing activities was $6.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared with $3.1 million used in 2016. During the first three months of 2017, we completed the replacement of pollution control equipment during the boiler maintenance shutdown at our Warren, Arkansas lumber mill. Capital spending is expected to be $27 million in 2017.

18

Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities decreased $9.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared with the same period last year. Net cash used in financing activities in 2017 was primarily attributable to paying dividends to stockholders of $15.2 million. In 2016, we reduced our borrowings by $7.5 million and paid dividends to stockholders of $15.3 million.

Credit and Term Loan Agreements

As of March 31, 2017, approximately $0.9 million of capacity under our credit agreement was utilized by outstanding letters of credit, resulting in $249.1 million available for additional borrowings.

The following table sets forth the financial covenants in the credit and term loan agreements and our status with respect to these covenants as of March 31, 2017:

Senior Notes

The terms of our senior notes limit our ability and the ability of any subsidiary guarantors to enter into restricted transactions, which include the ability to borrow money, pay dividends, redeem or repurchase capital stock, enter into sale and leaseback transactions and create liens. However, such restricted transactions are permitted if the balance of our cumulative Funds Available for Distribution (FAD), and a FAD basket amount, provide sufficient funds to cover such restricted payments. At March 31, 2017, our cumulative FAD was $216.3 million and the FAD basket was $90.1 million.

Contractual Obligations

There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations in the three months ended March 31, 2017 outside of the ordinary course of business.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We currently are not a party to off-balance sheet arrangements that would require disclosure under this section.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our exposures to market risk have not changed materially since December 31, 2016. For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see Item 7A – “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk” in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

19

Quantitative Information about Market Risks

The table below provides information about our outstanding long-term debt, weighted-average interest rates and interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2017. For debt obligations, the table presents principal cash flows and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates. For interest rate swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates by expected (contractual) maturity dates. Notional amounts are used to calculate the contractual payments to be exchanged under the contract. Weighted-average variable rates are based on implied forward rates in the yield curve.