Primis Financial
FRST
#7853
Rank
$0.33 B
Marketcap
$13.50
Share price
0.00%
Change (1 day)
64.84%
Change (1 year)

Primis Financial - 10-Q quarterly report FY2013 Q3


Text size:



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q
 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2013

Commission File No. 001-33037

SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANCORP OF VIRGINIA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Virginia 20-1417448
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)  
 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
                                                                                                                                                                                      
6830 Old Dominion Drive
McLean, Virginia 22101
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)

(703) 893-7400
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  

YES x            NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES x            NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b–2 of the Exchange Act:

Large accelerated filer      o                       Accelerated filer x                       Smaller reporting company o

Non-accelerated filer    o  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o   No x
 
As of November 1, 2013, there were 11,590,612 shares of common stock outstanding.
 
 
 

 


SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANCORP OF VIRGINIA, INC.
FORM 10-Q
September 30, 2013

INDEX

       PAGE
    
PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
   
     
Item 1 -Financial Statements   
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31,
2012
 
2
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012
 
3
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
for the nine months ended September 30, 2013
 
4
 
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2013 and 2012
 
5
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
6- 27
 
 
       
Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
28- 41
 
       
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
42-45
 
       
Item 4 – Controls and Procedures
 
46
 
       
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
     
       
Item 1 – Legal Proceedings
 
46
 
       
Item 1A – Risk Factors
 
46
 
       
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
46
 
       
Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
46
 
       
Item 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures
 
46
 
       
Item 5 – Other Information
 
46
 
       
Item 6 - Exhibits
 
47
 
       
Signatures
 
48
 
         
Certifications
 
49-51
 
 
 
 

 


ITEM I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART I - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANCORP OF VIRGINIA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)
       
   
September 30,
  
December 31,
 
   
2013
  
2012
 
ASSETS
      
Cash and cash equivalents:
      
Cash and due from financial institutions
 $4,859  $4,553 
Interest-bearing deposits in other financial institutions
  27,491   34,647 
Total cash and cash equivalents
  32,350   39,200 
          
Securities available for sale, at fair value
  2,020   2,391 
          
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value of $76,117 and $84,827, respectively)
  80,831   84,051 
          
Covered loans
  53,817   71,328 
Non-covered loans
  472,215   458,823 
Total loans
  526,032   530,151 
Less allowance for loan losses
  (7,443)  (7,066)
Net loans
  518,589   523,085 
          
Stock in Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank
  5,240   6,212 
Bank premises and equipment, net
  6,260   6,552 
Goodwill
  9,160   9,160 
Core deposit intangibles, net
  912   1,280 
FDIC indemnification asset
  5,338   6,735 
Bank-owned life insurance
  18,226   17,782 
Other real estate owned
  15,699   13,836 
Deferred tax assets, net
  8,270   8,174 
Other assets
  5,003   5,354 
         
Total assets
 $707,898  $723,812 
          
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
        
          
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
 $46,536  $49,644 
Interest-bearing deposits:
        
NOW accounts
  23,701   22,774 
Money market accounts
  136,181   163,233 
Savings accounts
  13,933   9,618 
Time deposits
  325,603   305,708 
Total interest-bearing deposits
  499,418   501,333 
Total deposits
  545,954   550,977 
          
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings
  20,481   33,411 
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances
  30,250   30,250 
Other liabilities
  5,241   5,998 
Total liabilities
  601,926   620,636 
          
 Commitments and contingencies (See Note 5)
  -   - 
          
 Stockholders equity:
        
Preferred stock, $.01 par value.  Authorized 5,000,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding
  -   - 
Common stock, $.01 par value.  Authorized 45,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 11,590,612 shares at September 30, 2013 and 11,590,212 at December 31, 2012
  116   116 
Additional paid in capital
  97,048   96,840 
Retained earnings
  11,977   9,201 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
  (3,169)  (2,981)
Total stockholders equity
  105,972   103,176 
          
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
 $707,898  $723,812 
 
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
2
 

 


SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANCORP OF VIRGINIA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)
              
   
For the Three Months Ended
  
For the Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
  
September 30,
 
              
   
2013
  
2012
  
2013
  
2012
 
              
 Interest and dividend income :
            
 Interest and fees on loans
 $8,168  $9,008  $24,277  $26,387 
 Interest and dividends on taxable securities
  504   490   1,540   1,401 
 Interest and dividends on tax exempt securities
  71   -   159   - 
 Interest and dividends on other earning assets
  104   102   443   247 
 Total interest and dividend income
  8,847   9,600   26,419   28,035 
 Interest expense:
                
 Interest on deposits
  966   1,304   3,086   3,803 
 Interest on borrowings
  157   165   465   628 
 Total interest expense
  1,123   1,469   3,551   4,431 
                  
 Net interest income
  7,724   8,131   22,868   23,604 
                  
 Provision for loan losses
  1,197   1,830   3,015   4,605 
 Net interest income after provision for loan losses
  6,527   6,301   19,853   18,999 
                  
 Noninterest income:
                
 Account maintenance and deposit service fees
  198   222   593   624 
 Income from bank-owned life insurance
  147   148   445   649 
 Bargain purchase gain on acquisition
  -   -   -   3,484 
 Gain on sale of loans
  -   -   -   657 
 Gain on other assets
  -   -   13   14 
 Net gain on sale of available for sale securities
  -   287   142   274 
 Total other-than-temporary impairment losses (OTTI)
  -   (480)  (3)  (721)
 Portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)
  -   -   -   4 
 Net credit related OTTI recognized in earnings
  -   (480)  (3)  (717)
 Other
  30   63   169   198 
                  
 Total noninterest income
  375   240   1,359   5,183 
                  
 Noninterest expenses:
                
 Salaries and benefits
  2,338   2,073   6,760   5,868 
 Occupancy expenses
  768   753   2,280   2,040 
 Furniture and equipment expenses
  197   149   524   448 
 Amortization of core deposit intangible
  123   236   368   694 
 Virginia franchise tax expense
  115   145   357   436 
 Merger expenses
  -   11   -   360 
 FDIC assessment
  218   146   676   417 
 Data processing expense
  131   175   433   474 
 Telephone and communication expense
  166   183   507   418 
 Change in FDIC indemnification asset
  113   242   350   481 
 Net (gain)  loss on other real estate owned
  (698)  (24)  (580)  2,376 
 Other operating expenses
  790   665   2,334   2,417 
 Total noninterest expenses
  4,261   4,754   14,009   16,429 
 Income before income taxes
  2,641   1,787   7,203   7,753 
 Income tax expense
  861   579   2,341   2,487 
 Net income
 $1,780  $1,208  $4,862  $5,266 
 Other comprehensive income (loss):
                
   Unrealized loss on available for sale securities
 $(12) $(107) $(207) $(26)
   Realized amount on securities sold, net
  -   (287)  (142)  (274)
   Non-credit component of other-than-temporary impairment on held-to-maturity securities
  -   475   97   676 
   Accretion of amounts previously recorded upon transfer to held-to-maturity from available-for-sale
  (12)  (17)  (32)  (77)
Net unrealized gain (loss)
  (24)  64   (284)  299 
Tax effect
  8   (21)  96   (101)
Other comprehensive income (loss)
  (16)  43   (188)  198 
Comprehensive income
 $1,764  $1,251  $4,674  $5,464 
Earnings per share, basic and diluted
 $0.15  $0.10  $0.42  $0.45 
 
 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
3
 

 

 
SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANCORP OF VIRGINIA, INC.
          
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
       
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013
             
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)
             
                 
            
Accumulated
    
      
Additional
     
Other
    
   
Common
  
Paid in
  
Retained
  
Comprehensive
    
   
Stock
  
Capital
  
Earnings
  
Loss
  
Total
 
                 
Balance - January 1, 2013
 $116  $96,840  $9,201  $(2,981) $103,176 
Comprehensive income:
                    
    Net income
          4,862       4,862 
Change in unrealized loss  on securities available for sale (net of tax benefit, $119)
              (230)  (230)
Change in unrecognized loss on securities held to maturity for which a portion of OTTI has been recognized (net of tax, $23 and accretion, $32 and amounts recorded into other comprehensive income at transfer)
              42   42 
Dividends on common stock ($.18 per share)
          (2,086)      (2,086)
Issuance of common stock under Stock Incentive Plan (400 shares)
      3           3 
Stock-based compensation expense
      205           205 
                      
Balance - September 30, 2013
 $116  $97,048  $11,977  $(3,169) $105,972 
                      
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
4
 

 

 
SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANCORP OF VIRGINIA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012
(dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)
 
   
2013
  
2012
 
        
Operating activities:
      
Net income
 $4,862  $5,266 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash and cash equivalents provided  by operating activities:
        
Depreciation
  495   430 
Amortization of core deposit intangible
  368   694 
Other amortization, net
  275   210 
Accretion of loan discount
  (2,725)  (3,277)
Amortization of FDIC indemnification asset
  350   481 
Provision for loan losses
  3,015   4,605 
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance
  (445)  (649)
Stock based compensation expense
  205   146 
Bargain purchase gain on acquisition
  -   (3,484)
Net gain on sale of available for sale securities
  (142)  (274)
Gain on sale of loans
  -   (657)
Impairment on securities
  3   717 
Net (gain) loss on other real estate owned
  (580)  2,376 
Net (increase) decrease in other assets
  2,261   (456)
Net increase (decrease) in other liabilities
  (757)  399 
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities
  7,185   6,527 
Investing activities:
        
Purchases of available for sale securities
  -   (3,128)
Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities
  159   22,914 
Proceeds from paydowns, maturities and calls of available for sale securities
  -   1,318 
Purchases of  held to maturity securities
  (11,345)  (27,410)
Proceeds from paydowns, maturities and calls of held to maturity securities
  14,497   8,973 
Loan originations and payments, net
  (2,996)  11,238 
Proceeds from sale of HarVest loans
  -   7,568 
Proceeds from sale of SBA loans
  -   5,713 
Net cash received in HarVest acquisition
  -   47,257 
Net decrease in stock in Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank
  972   1,630 
Proceeds from cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance
  -   395 
Payments received on FDIC indemnification asset
  1,016   155 
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned
  3,902   1,137 
Purchases of bank premises and equipment
  (204)  (557)
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by investing activities
  6,001   77,203 
Financing activities:
        
Net decrease in deposits
  (5,023)  (64,328)
Cash dividends paid - common stock
  (2,086)  (638)
Issuance of common stock under Stock Incentive Plan
  3   - 
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
  -   (16,488)
    Net increase (decrease) in securities sold under agreement to repurchase and other short-term borrowings
  (12,930)  14,977 
Net cash and cash equivalents used in financing activities
  (20,036)  (66,477)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  (6,850)  17,253 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
  39,200   5,035 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 $32,350  $22,288 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
        
Cash payments for:
        
Interest
 $3,419  $4,464 
Income taxes
  3,113   1,788 
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities
        
Transfer from non-covered loans to other real estate owned
  3,044   1,959 
Transfer from covered loans to other real estate owned
  4,158   - 
          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
 
5
 

 

 
SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANCORP OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2013
 
1.   ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (“Southern National”) is a corporation formed on July 28, 2004 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and is the holding company for Sonabank (“Sonabank”) a Virginia state chartered bank which commenced operations on April 14, 2005.  The principal activities of Sonabank are to attract deposits and originate loans as permitted under applicable banking regulations.  Sonabank has fifteen branches in Virginia, located in Fairfax County (Reston, McLean and Fairfax), in Charlottesville, Warrenton (2), Middleburg, Leesburg (2), South Riding, Front Royal, New Market, Haymarket,  Richmond and Clifton Forge, and five branches in Maryland, in Rockville, Shady Grove, Germantown, Frederick and Bethesda.
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. and its subsidiary.  Significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U. S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and instructions for Form 10-Q and follow general practice within the banking industry.  Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U. S. GAAP for complete financial statements.  However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods presented have been made. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Southern National’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U. S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.  Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the carrying value of investment securities, other than temporary impairment of investment securities, the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, the FDIC indemnification asset,  mortgage servicing rights, other real estate owned and deferred tax assets.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This standard update requires companies to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. We adopted this standard in the first quarter of 2013 and have included the additional disclosures.
 
6
 

 

 
2.
STOCK- BASED COMPENSATION
 
In 2004, the Board of Directors adopted a stock option plan that authorized the reservation of up to 302,500 shares of common stock and provided for the granting of stock options to certain directors, officers and employees.  As of September 30, 2013, options to purchase an aggregate of 302,500 shares of common stock were outstanding and no shares remained available for issuance. The 2010 Stock Awards and Incentive Plan was approved by the Board of Directors in January 2010 and approved by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting in April 2010. The 2010 plan authorized the reservation of 700,000 shares of common stock for the granting of stock awards. The options granted to officers and employees are incentive stock options and the options granted to non-employee directors are non-qualified stock options.  The purpose of the plan is to afford key employees an incentive to remain in the employ of Southern National and to assist in the attracting and retaining of non-employee directors by affording them an opportunity to share in Southern National’s future success.  Under the plan, the option’s price cannot be less than the fair market value of the stock on the grant date.  The maximum term of the options is ten years and options granted may be subject to a graded vesting schedule.
 
Southern National granted 120,250 options during the first nine months of 2013. The fair value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes options-pricing model.  The following weighted-average assumptions were used to value options granted in the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
 
Expected life
 
10 years
Expected volatility
  34.21%
Risk-free interest rate
  2.42%
Weighted average fair value per option granted
 $3.58 
Dividend yield
  1.29%
 
The risk-free interest rate was developed using the U. S. Treasury yield curve for periods equal to the expected life of the options on the grant date.  An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase stock compensation expense on future option grants.
 
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, stock-based compensation expense was $79 thousand and $205 thousand, respectively, compared to $49 thousand and $146 thousand for the same periods last year.  As of September 30, 2013, unrecognized compensation expense associated with the stock options was $1.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.8 years.
 
7
 

 

 
A summary of the activity in the stock option plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 follows (dollars in thousands):
         
Weighted
    
      
Weighted
  
Average
    
      
Average
  
Remaining
  
Aggregate
 
      
Exercise
  
Contractual
  
Intrinsic
 
   
Shares
  
Price
  
Term
  
Value
 
Options outstanding, beginning of period
  512,825  $7.98       
Granted
  120,250   9.18       
Forfeited
  -   -       
Exercised
  (400)  6.90       
Options outstanding, end of period
  632,675  $8.21   6.3  $915 
                  
Vested or expected to vest
  632,675  $8.21   6.3  $915 
                  
Exercisable at end of period
  304,695  $8.36   4.0  $405 
 
3.    SECURITIES
 
The amortized cost and fair value of available for sale securities and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows (in thousands):
              
   
Amortized
  
Gross Unrealized
  
Fair
 
September 30, 2013
 
Cost
  
Gains
  
Losses
  
Value
 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
 $2,303  $-  $(283) $2,020 
                  
   
Amortized
  
Gross Unrealized
  
Fair
 
December 31, 2012
 
Cost
  
Gains
  
Losses
  
Value
 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
 $2,309  $2  $(22) $2,289 
FHLMC preferred stock
  16   86   -   102 
Total
 $2,325  $88  $(22) $2,391 
 
The amortized cost, unrecognized gains and losses, and fair value of securities held to maturity were as follows (in thousands):
          
   
Amortized
  
Gross Unrecognized
  
Fair
 
September 30, 2013
 
Cost
  
Gains
  
Losses
  
Value
 
 Residential government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
 $26,964  $751  $(105) $27,610 
 Residential government-sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations
  4,538   5   (292)  4,251 
 Government-sponsored agency securities
  29,970   -   (3,042)  26,928 
 Obligations of states and political subdivisions
  10,991   -   (871)  10,120 
 Other residential collateralized mortgage obligations
  713   -   (17)  696 
 Trust preferred securities
  7,655   975   (2,118)  6,512 
   $80,831  $1,731  $(6,445) $76,117 
          
   
Amortized
  
Gross Unrecognized
  
Fair
 
December 31, 2012
 
Cost
  
Gains
  
Losses
  
Value
 
Residential government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
 $35,375  $1,559  $-  $36,934 
Residential government-sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations
  5,444   81   -   5,525 
Government-sponsored agency securities
  29,983   52   (4)  30,031 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
  4,689   1   (69)  4,621 
Other residential collateralized mortgage obligations
  817   -   (24)  793 
Trust preferred securities
  7,743   1,422   (2,242)  6,923 
   $84,051  $3,115  $(2,339) $84,827 
 
8
 

 

 
The amortized cost amounts are net of recognized other than temporary impairment.
 
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we sold 55 thousand shares of available for sale FHLMC preferred stock resulting in a gain of $142 thousand.
 
The fair value and carrying amount, if different, of debt securities as of September 30, 2013, by contractual maturity were as follows (in thousands).  Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, are shown separately.
       
   
Held to Maturity
  
Available for Sale
 
   
Amortized
     
Amortized
    
   
Cost
  
Fair Value
  
Cost
  
Fair Value
 
 Due in five to ten years
 $4,254  $4,035  $-  $- 
 Due after ten years
  44,362   39,525   2,303   2,020 
 Residential government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
  26,964   27,610   -   - 
 Residential government-sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations
  4,538   4,251   -   - 
 Other residential  collateralized mortgage obligations
  713   696   -   - 
      Total
 $80,831  $76,117  $2,303  $2,020 
 
Securities with a carrying amount of approximately 64.3 million and $62.3 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, repurchase agreements and a line of credit for advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”).
 
9
 

 

 
Southern National monitors the portfolio for indicators of other than temporary impairment.  At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, certain securities’ fair values were below cost. As outlined in the table below, there were securities with fair values totaling approximately $61.1 million in the portfolio with the carrying value exceeding the estimated fair value that are considered temporarily impaired at September 30, 2013.  Because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and market illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because we do not have the intent to sell these securities and it is likely that we will not be required to sell the securities before their anticipated recovery, management does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2013. The following tables present information regarding securities in a continuous unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands) by duration of time in a loss position:
                   
September 30, 2013
                  
   
Less than 12 months
  
12 Months or More
  
Total
 
Available for Sale
 
Fair value
  
Unrealized Losses
  
Fair value
  
Unrealized Losses
  
Fair value
  
Unrealized Losses
 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
 $2,020  $(283) $-  $-  $2,020  $(283)
                          
   
Less than 12 months
  
12 Months or More
  
Total
 
Held to Maturity
 
Fair value
  
Unrecognized Losses
  
Fair value
  
Unrecognized Losses
  
Fair value
  
Unrecognized Losses
 
Residential government-sponsored mortgage-backed securities
 $13,312  $(105) $-  $-  $13,312  $(105)
Residential government-sponsored collateralized mortgage obligations
  3,161   (292)  -   -   3,161   (292)
Government-sponsored agency securities
  26,928   (3,042)  -   -   26,928   (3,042)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
  10,120   (871)          10,120   (871)
Other residential collateralized mortgage obligations
  696   (17)  -   -   696   (17)
Trust preferred securities
  -   -   4,830   (2,118)  4,830   (2,118)
   $54,217  $(4,327) $4,830  $(2,118) $59,047  $(6,445)
                          
December 31, 2012
                        
   
Less than 12 months
  
12 Months or More
  
Total
 
Available for Sale
 
Fair value
  
Unrealized Losses
  
Fair value
  
Unrealized Losses
  
Fair value
  
Unrealized Losses
 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
 $1,552  $(22) $-  $-  $1,552  $(22)
                          
   
Less than 12 months
  
12 Months or More
  
Total
 
Held to Maturity
 
Fair value
  
Unrecognized Losses
  
Fair value
  
Unrecognized Losses
  
Fair value
  
Unrecognized Losses
 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
 $4,189  $(69) $-  $-  $4,189  $(69)
Government-sponsored agency securities
  4,996   (4)  -   -   4,996   (4)
Other residential collateralized mortgage obligations
  793   (24)  -   -   793   (24)
Trust preferred securities
  -   -   4,849   (2,242)  4,849   (2,242)
   $9,978  $(97) $4,849  $(2,242) $14,827  $(2,339)
 
As of September 30, 2013, we owned pooled trust preferred securities as follows:
                                
                             
Previously
    
                          
% of Current
  
Recognized
    
                          
Defaults and
  
Cumulative
    
     
Ratings
              
Estimated
  
Deferrals to
  
Other
    
 
Tranche
 
When Purchased
  
Current Ratings
     
Fair
  
Total
  
Comprehensive
    
Security
Level
 
Moody’s
  
Fitch
  
Moody’s
  
Fitch
  
Par Value
  
Book Value
  
Value
  
Collateral
  
Loss (1)
    
                 
(in thousands)
          
ALESCO VII  A1B
Senior
  
Aaa
   
AAA
  
Baa3
  
BB
  $6,654  $6,020  $4,077   16% $281    
MMCF III B
Senior Sub
  A3   A-  
Ba1
  
CC
   421   413   241   30%  8    
                    7,075   6,433   4,318      $289    
                                         
                                   
Cumulative Other
  
Cumulative
 
                                   
Comprehensive
  
OTTI Related to
 
Other Than Temporarily Impaired:
                                 
Loss (2)
  
Credit Loss (2)
 
TPREF FUNDING II
Mezzanine
  A1   A-  
Caa3
   C   1,500   515   512   41%  626  $359 
TRAP 2007-XII C1
Mezzanine
  A3   A   C   C   2,140   56   104   39%  791   1,293 
TRAP 2007-XIII D
Mezzanine
  
NR
   A-   
NR
   C   2,039   -   76   29%  7   2,032 
MMC FUNDING XVIII
Mezzanine
  A3   A-   
Ca
   C   1,084   27   239   30%  366   691 
ALESCO V C1
Mezzanine
  A2   A   C   C   2,150   475   586   18%  1,014   661 
ALESCO XV C1
Mezzanine
  A3   A-   C   C   3,222   30   105   35%  633   2,559 
ALESCO XVI  C
Mezzanine
  A3   A-   C   C   2,143   119   572   15%  844   1,180 
                      14,278   1,222   2,194      $4,281  $8,775 
                                            
Total
                   $21,353  $7,655  $6,512             
                                            
(1) Pre-tax, and represents unrealized losses at date of transfer from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity, net of accretion
         
(2)  Pre-tax
                                          
 
10
 

 

 
Each of these securities has been evaluated for other than temporary impairment (“OTTI”).  In performing a detailed cash flow analysis of each security, Sonabank works with independent third parties to estimate expected cash flows and assist with the evaluation of other than temporary impairment. The cash flow analyses performed included the following assumptions:
 
 
.5% of the remaining performing collateral will default or defer per annum.
 
Recoveries ranging from 23% to 39% with a two year lag on all defaults and deferrals.
 
No prepayments for 10 years and then 1% per annum for the remaining life of the security.
 
Additionally banks with assets over $15 billion will no longer be allowed to count down streamed trust preferred proceeds as Tier 1 capital (although it will still be counted as Tier 2 capital). That will incent the large banks to prepay their trust preferred securities if they can or if it is economically desirable. As a consequence, we have projected in all of our pools that 25% of the collateral issued by banks with assets over $15 billion will prepay in 2013.
 
Our securities have been modeled using the above assumptions by independent third parties using the forward LIBOR curve to discount projected cash flows to present values.
 
We recognized no OTTI charges during the third quarter of 2013 and recognized OTTI charges of $3 thousand during the first nine months of 2013 compared to OTTI charges related to credit on the trust preferred securities totaling $480 thousand and $717 thousand during the same periods of 2012.
 
The following table presents a roll forward of the credit losses on our securities held to maturity recognized in earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):
       
   
2013
  
2012
 
        
Amount of cumulative other-than-temporary impairment related to credit loss prior to January 1
 $8,964  $8,277 
Amounts related to credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized
  -   - 
Amounts related to credit loss for which an other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized
  3   717 
Reductions due to realized losses
  (51)  (25)
Amount of cumulative other-than-temporary impairment related to credit loss as of September 30
 $8,916  $8,969 
 
11
 

 

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income by component for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are shown in the table below.  All amounts are net of tax (in thousands).
           
   
Unrealized Holding
       
   
Gains (Losses) on
       
For the three months ended September 30, 2013
 
Available for Sale
  
Held to Maturity
    
   
Securities
  
Securities
  
Total
 
Beginning balance
 $(178) $(2,975) $(3,153)
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications
  (8)  (8)  (16)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)
  -   -   - 
Net current-period other comprehensive income/(loss)
  (8)  (8)  (16)
Ending balance
 $(186) $(2,983) $(3,169)
              
   
Unrealized Holding
         
   
Gains (Losses) on
         
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013
 
Available for Sale
  
Held to Maturity
     
   
Securities
  
Securities
  
Total
 
Beginning balance
 $44  $(3,025) $(2,981)
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications
  (137)  43   (94)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)
  (93)  (1)  (94)
Net current-period other comprehensive income/(loss)
  (230)  42   (188)
Ending balance
 $(186) $(2,983) $(3,169)
 
  4.           LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The following table summarizes the composition of our loan portfolio as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
 
   
Covered
  
Non-covered
  
Total
  
Covered
  
Non-covered
  
Total
 
   
Loans (1)
  
Loans
  
Loans
  
Loans (1)
  
Loans
  
Loans
 
   
September 30, 2013
  
December 31, 2012
 
Loans secured by real estate:
                  
Commercial real estate - owner-occupied
 $1,618  $100,182  $101,800  $4,143  $93,288  $97,431 
Commercial real estate - non-owner-occupied
  5,863   139,773   145,636   10,246   130,152   140,398 
Secured by farmland
  101   512   613   -   1,479   1,479 
Construction and land loans
  4   31,872   31,876   1,261   44,946   46,207 
Residential 1-4 family
  17,933   65,658   83,591   21,005   61,319   82,324 
Multi- family residential
  590   21,570   22,160   614   18,774   19,388 
Home equity lines of credit
  26,457   6,667   33,124   31,292   9,178   40,470 
Total real estate loans
  52,566   366,234   418,800   68,561   359,136   427,697 
                          
Commercial loans
  1,162   105,959   107,121   2,672   99,081   101,753 
Consumer loans
  85   1,300   1,385   88   1,623   1,711 
Gross loans
  53,813   473,493   527,306   71,321   459,840   531,161 
                          
Less deferred fees on loans
  4   (1,278)  (1,274)  7   (1,017)  (1,010)
Loans, net of deferred fees
 $53,817  $472,215  $526,032  $71,328  $458,823  $530,151 
 
(1) Covered Loans were acquired in the Greater Atlantic transaction and are covered under an FDIC loss-share agreement.
 
Accounting policy related to the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical policy given the level of estimation, judgment, and uncertainty in evaluation of the levels of the allowance required to account for the inherent probable losses in the loan portfolio and the material effect such estimation, judgment, and uncertainty can have on the consolidated financial results.
 
As part of the Greater Atlantic acquisition, the Bank and the FDIC entered into a loss sharing agreement on approximately $143.4 million (contractual basis) of Greater Atlantic Bank’s assets.  The Bank will share in the losses on the loans and foreclosed loan collateral with the FDIC as specified in the loss sharing agreement; we refer to these assets collectively as “covered assets.”  Loans that are not covered in the loss sharing agreement are referred to as “non-covered loans.” Non-covered loans included $41.3 million of loans acquired in the HarVest acquisition. Accretable discount on the acquired covered loans and the HarVest loans was $9.7 million and $11.7 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
 
12
 

 

 
Credit-impaired covered loans are those loans which presented evidence of credit deterioration at the date of acquisition and it is probable that Southern National would not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. Generally, acquired loans that meet Southern National’s definition for nonaccrual status fell within the definition of credit-impaired covered loans.

Impaired loans for the covered and non-covered portfolios were as follows (in thousands):
 
September 30, 2013
 
Covered Loans
  
Non-covered Loans
  
Total Loans
 
      
Unpaid
        
Unpaid
        
Unpaid
    
   
Recorded
  
Principal
  
Related
  
Recorded
  
Principal
  
Related
  
Recorded
  
Principal
  
Related
 
   
Investment
  
Balance
  
Allowance
  
Investment (1)
  
Balance
  
Allowance
  
Investment
  
Balance
  
Allowance
 
With no related allowance recorded
                           
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $135  $229  $-  $7,543  $7,543  $-  $7,678  $7,772  $- 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  1,432   2,302   -   365   457   -   1,797   2,759   - 
Construction and land development
  -   -   -   2,107   2,307   -   2,107   2,307   - 
Commercial loans
  43   73   -   2,496   2,966   -   2,539   3,039   - 
Residential 1-4 family
  1,546   1,909   -   2,917   3,217   -   4,463   5,126   - 
Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                                      
Total
 $3,156  $4,513  $-  $15,428  $16,490  $-  $18,584  $21,003  $- 
                                      
With an allowance recorded
                                    
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $-  $-  $-  $118  $218  $118  $118  $218  $118 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  -   -   -   966   966   61   966   966   61 
Construction and land development
  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Commercial loans
  -   -   -   1,831   2,031   200   1,831   2,031   200 
Residential 1-4 family
  -   -   -   5,320   5,503   440   5,320   5,503   440 
Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                                      
Total
 $-  $-  $-  $8,235  $8,718  $819  $8,235  $8,718  $819 
Grand total
 $3,156  $4,513  $-  $23,663  $25,208  $819  $26,819  $29,721  $819 
 
(1) Recorded investment is after cumulative prior charge offs of $1.3 million.  These loans also have aggregate SBA guarantees of $1.2 million.
(2) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
(3) The Bank recognizes loan impairment and may concurrently record a charge off to the allowance for loan losses.
 
December 31, 2012
 
Covered Loans
  
Non-covered Loans
  
Total Loans
 
      
Unpaid
        
Unpaid
        
Unpaid
    
   
Recorded
  
Principal
  
Related
  
Recorded
  
Principal
  
Related
  
Recorded
  
Principal
  
Related
 
   
Investment
  
Balance
  
Allowance
  
Investment (1)
  
Balance
  
Allowance
  
Investment
  
Balance
  
Allowance
 
With no related allowance recorded
                           
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $138  $234  $-  $3,318  $3,507  $-  $3,456  $3,741  $- 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  2,114   3,543   -   1,705   2,010   -   3,819   5,553   - 
Construction and land development
  1,108   1,852   -   2,981   3,787   -   4,089   5,639   - 
Commercial loans
  212   359   -   5,212   5,769   -   5,424   6,128   - 
Residential 1-4 family
  1,555   1,805   -   3,368   3,921   -   4,923   5,726   - 
Other consumer loans
  -       -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                                      
Total
 $5,127  $7,793  $-  $16,584  $18,994  $-  $21,711  $26,787  $- 
                                      
With an allowance recorded
                                    
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $-  $-  $-  $137  $237  $137  $137  $237  $137 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  -   -   -   1,177   1,177   260   1,177   1,177   260 
Construction and land development
  -   -   -   -   -       -   -   - 
Commercial loans
  -   -   -   -   -       -   -   - 
Residential 1-4 family
  -   -   -   5,791   5,791   440   5,791   5,791   440 
Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                                      
Total
 $-  $-  $-  $7,105  $7,205  $837  $7,105  $7,205  $837 
Grand total
 $5,127  $7,793  $-  $23,689  $26,199  $837  $28,816  $33,992  $837 
 
(1) Recorded investment is after cumulative prior charge offs of $2.1 million.  These loans also have aggregate SBA guarantees of $2.6 million.
(2) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
(3) The Bank recognizes loan impairment and may concurrently record a charge off to the allowance for loan losses.
 
13
 

 

 
The following tables present the average recorded investment and interest income for impaired loans recognized by class of loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):
 
Three months ended September 30, 2013
                  
   
Covered Loans
  
Non-covered Loans
  
Total Loans
 
   
Average
  
Interest
  
Average
  
Interest
  
Average
  
Interest
 
   
Recorded
  
Income
  
Recorded
  
Income
  
Recorded
  
Income
 
   
Investment
  
Recognized
  
Investment
  
Recognized
  
Investment
  
Recognized
 
With no related allowance recorded
                  
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $135  $5  $7,564  $132  $7,699  $137 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  1,448   30   365   9   1,813   39 
Construction and land development
  -   -   2,241   -   2,241   - 
Commercial loans
  44   1   2,408   26   2,452   27 
Residential 1-4 family
  1,504   19   2,917   35   4,421   54 
Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                          
Total
 $3,131  $55  $15,495  $202  $18,626  $257 
                          
With an allowance recorded
                        
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $-  $-  $119  $4  $119  $4 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  -   -   967   17   967   17 
Construction and land development
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Commercial loans
  -   -   1,831   -   1,831   - 
Residential 1-4 family
  -   -   5,325   85   5,325   85 
Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                          
Total
 $-  $-  $8,242  $106  $8,242  $106 
Grand total
 $3,131  $55  $23,737  $308  $26,868  $363 
                          
(2) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
                        
                          
Three months ended September 30, 2012
                        
   
Covered Loans
  
Non-covered Loans
  
Total Loans
 
   
Average
  
Interest
  
Average
  
Interest
  
Average
  
Interest
 
   
Recorded
  
Income
  
Recorded
  
Income
  
Recorded
  
Income
 
   
Investment
  
Recognized
  
Investment
  
Recognized
  
Investment
  
Recognized
 
With no related allowance recorded
                        
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $133  $5  $677  $-  $810  $5 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  2,339   13   2,049   17   4,388   30 
Construction and land development
  1,096   25   3,821   4   4,917   29 
Commercial loans
  208   5   3,724   28   3,932   33 
Residential 1-4 family
  1,162   5   4,132   24   5,294   29 
Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                          
Total
 $4,938  $53  $14,403  $73  $19,341  $126 
                          
With an allowance recorded
                        
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $-  $-  $285  $6  $285  $6 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  -   -   1,303   27   1,303   27 
Construction and land development
  -   -   1,975   36   1,975   36 
Commercial loans
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Residential 1-4 family
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                          
Total
 $-  $-  $3,563  $69  $3,563  $69 
Grand total
 $4,938  $53  $17,966  $142  $22,904  $195 
                          
(2) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
                        
 
14
 

 

 
Nine months ended September 30, 2013
                  
   
Covered Loans
  
Non-covered Loans
  
Total Loans
 
   
Average
  
Interest
  
Average
  
Interest
  
Average
  
Interest
 
   
Recorded
  
Income
  
Recorded
  
Income
  
Recorded
  
Income
 
   
Investment
  
Recognized
  
Investment
  
Recognized
  
Investment
  
Recognized
 
With no related allowance recorded
                  
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $136  $14  $6,144  $308  $6,280  $322 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  1,464   92   373   28   1,837   120 
Construction and land development
  -   -   903   -   903   - 
Commercial loans
  44   4   1,718   47   1,762   51 
Residential 1-4 family
  1,464   53   2,892   101   4,356   154 
Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                          
Total
 $3,108  $163  $12,030  $484  $15,138  $647 
                          
With an allowance recorded
                        
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $-  $-  $125  $13  $125  $13 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  -   -   972   50   972   50 
Construction and land development
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Commercial loans
  -   -   1,951   -   1,951   - 
Residential 1-4 family
  -   -   5,434   253   5,434   253 
Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                          
Total
 $-  $-  $8,482  $316  $8,482  $316 
Grand total
 $3,108  $163  $20,512  $800  $23,620  $963 
                          
(2) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
                        
                          
Nine months ended September 30, 2012
                        
   
Covered Loans
  
Non-covered Loans
  
Total Loans
 
   
Average
  
Interest
  
Average
  
Interest
  
Average
  
Interest
 
   
Recorded
  
Income
  
Recorded
  
Income
  
Recorded
  
Income
 
   
Investment
  
Recognized
  
Investment
  
Recognized
  
Investment
  
Recognized
 
With no related allowance recorded
                        
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $135  $14  $203  $-  $338  $14 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  2,194   55   2,113   17   4,307   72 
Construction and land development
  1,085   76   3,410   50   4,495   126 
Commercial loans
  210   17   3,657   111   3,867   128 
Residential 1-4 family
  1,164   19   2,001   31   3,165   50 
Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                          
Total
 $4,788  $181  $11,384  $209  $16,172  $390 
                          
With an allowance recorded
                        
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $-  $-  $286  $16  $286  $16 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2)
  -   -   1,435   78   1,435   78 
Construction and land development
  -   -   2,179   87   2,179   87 
Commercial loans
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Residential 1-4 family
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   - 
                          
Total
 $-  $-  $3,900  $181  $3,900  $181 
Grand total
 $4,788  $181  $15,284  $390  $20,072  $571 
                          
(2) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
                        
 
15
 

 

 
The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans by class of loans as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
 
September 30, 2013
  30 - 59   60 - 89                
   
Days
  
Days
  
90 Days
  
Total
  
Nonaccrual
  
Loans Not
  
Total
 
   
Past Due
  
Past Due
  
or More
  
Past Due
  
Loans
  
Past Due
  
Loans
 
Covered loans:
                       
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $315  $-  $-  $315  $-  $1,303  $1,618 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  510   -   -   510   245   5,799   6,554 
    Construction and land development
  -   -   -   -   -   4   4 
    Commercial loans
  -   -   -   -   -   1,162   1,162 
    Residential 1-4 family
  209   -   -   209   1,380   42,801   44,390 
    Other consumer loans
  1   -   -   1   -   84   85 
                              
Total
 $1,035  $-  $-  $1,035  $1,625  $51,153  $53,813 
                              
Non-covered loans:
                            
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $3,896  $-  $-  $3,896  $-  $96,286  $100,182 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  457   -   -   457   -   161,398   161,855 
    Construction and land development
  1,383   18   -   1,401   2,108   28,363   31,872 
    Commercial loans
  1,295   1,003   -   2,298   3,068   100,593   105,959 
    Residential 1-4 family
  3,372   6,769   -   10,141   146   62,038   72,325 
    Other consumer loans
  12   -   -   12   -   1,288   1,300 
                              
Total
 $10,415  $7,790  $-  $18,205  $5,322  $449,966  $473,493 
                              
Total loans:
                            
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $4,211  $-  $-  $4,211  $-  $97,589  $101,800 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  967   -   -   967   245   167,197   168,409 
    Construction and land development
  1,383   18   -   1,401   2,108   28,367   31,876 
    Commercial loans
  1,295   1,003   -   2,298   3,068   101,755   107,121 
    Residential 1-4 family
  3,581   6,769   -   10,350   1,526   104,839   116,715 
    Other consumer loans
  13   -   -   13   -   1,372   1,385 
                              
Total
 $11,450  $7,790  $-  $19,240  $6,947  $501,119  $527,306 
                              
December 31, 2012
  30 - 59   60 - 89                     
   
Days
  
Days
  
90 Days
  
Total
  
Nonaccrual
  
Loans Not
  
Total
 
   
Past Due
  
Past Due
  
or More
  
Past Due
  
Loans
  
Past Due
  
Loans
 
Covered loans:
                            
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $373  $-  $-  $373  $-  $3,770  $4,143 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  151   2,321   -   2,472   -   8,388   10,860 
    Construction and land development
  72   -   -   72   51   1,138   1,261 
    Commercial loans
  143   -   -   143   1,963   566   2,672 
    Residential 1-4 family
  257   -   -   257   1,555   50,485   52,297 
    Other consumer loans
  -   -   -   -   -   88   88 
                              
Total
 $996  $2,321  $-  $3,317  $3,569  $64,435  $71,321 
                              
Non-covered loans:
                            
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $2,025  $-  $-  $2,025  $580  $90,683  $93,288 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  861   -   -   861   626   148,918   150,405 
    Construction and land development
  35   -   -   35   1,484   43,427   44,946 
    Commercial loans
  1,164   191   -   1,355   4,469   93,257   99,081 
    Residential 1-4 family
  3,586   2,888   -   6,474   469   63,554   70,497 
    Other consumer loans
  150   -   -   150   -   1,473   1,623 
                              
Total
 $7,821  $3,079  $-  $10,900  $7,628  $441,312  $459,840 
                              
Total loans:
                            
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $2,398  $-  $-  $2,398  $580  $94,453  $97,431 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  1,012   2,321   -   3,333   626   157,306   161,265 
    Construction and land development
  107   -   -   107   1,535   44,565   46,207 
    Commercial loans
  1,307   191   -   1,498   6,432   93,823   101,753 
    Residential 1-4 family
  3,843   2,888   -   6,731   2,024   114,039   122,794 
    Other consumer loans
  150   -   -   150   -   1,561   1,711 
                              
Total
 $8,817  $5,400  $-  $14,217  $11,197  $505,747  $531,161 
                              
(1) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
                     
 
16
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Non-covered nonaccrual loans include SBA guaranteed amounts totaling $1.2 million and $2.6 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Activity in the allowance for non-covered loan and lease losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is summarized below (in thousands):

   
Commercial
  
Commercial
                   
   
Real Estate
  
Real Estate
  
Construction
        
Other
       
Non-covered loans:
 
Owner
  
Non-owner
  
and Land
  
Commercial
  
1-4 Family
  
Consumer
       
Three months ended September 30, 2013
 
Occupied
  
Occupied (1)
  
Development
  
Loans
  
Residential
  
Loans
  
Unallocated
  
Total
 
Allowance for loan losses:
                        
Beginning balance
 $732  $1,090  $1,026  $2,742  $1,407  $55  $178  $7,230 
  Charge offs
  -   -   (350)  (806)  -   (2)  -   (1,158)
  Recoveries
  4   87   1   23   4   1   -   120 
  Provision
  (33)  (198)  484   552   49   -   346   1,200 
Ending balance
 $703  $979  $1,161  $2,511  $1,460  $54  $524  $7,392 
                                  
Three months ended September 30, 2012
                                
Allowance for loan losses:
                                
Beginning balance
 $625  $1,015  $1,474  $2,544  $885  $35  $77  $6,655 
  Charge offs
  -   (1,049)  (338)  (211)  (300)  -   -   (1,898)
  Recoveries
  -   262   10   49   3   -   -   324 
  Provision
  188   1,075   252   14   142   -   159   1,830 
Ending balance
 $813  $1,303  $1,398  $2,396  $730  $35  $236  $6,911 
 
   
Commercial
  
Commercial
                   
   
Real Estate
  
Real Estate
  
Construction
        
Other
       
Non-covered loans:
 
Owner
  
Non-owner
  
and Land
  
Commercial
  
1-4 Family
  
Consumer
       
Nine months ended September 30, 2013
 
Occupied
  
Occupied (1)
  
Development
  
Loans
  
Residential
  
Loans
  
Unallocated
  
Total
 
Allowance for loan losses:
                        
Beginning balance
 $932  $1,474  $970  $2,110  $1,163  $33  $285  $6,967 
  Charge offs
  -   (199)  (650)  (1,471)  (518)  (143)  -   (2,981)
  Recoveries
  12   138   7   97   126   2   -   382 
  Provision
  (241)  (434)  834   1,775   689   162   239   3,024 
Ending balance
 $703  $979  $1,161  $2,511  $1,460  $54  $524  $7,392 
                                  
Nine months ended September 30, 2012
                                
Allowance for loan losses:
                                
Beginning balance
 $627  $1,011  $1,367  $2,227  $1,021  $42  $-  $6,295 
  Charge offs
  -   (1,081)  (1,618)  (1,378)  (522)  (6)  -   (4,605)
  Recoveries
  -   262   10   322   16   6   -   616 
  Provision
  186   1,111   1,639   1,225   215   (7)  236   4,605 
Ending balance
 $813  $1,303  $1,398  $2,396  $730  $35  $236  $6,911 
                                  
(1) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
  
 
Activity in the allowance for covered loan and lease losses by class of loan for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 is summarized below (in thousands).  There was no allowance for loan and lease losses for covered loans recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2012.
 
   
Commercial
  
Commercial
                   
   
Real Estate
  
Real Estate
  
Construction
        
Other
       
Covered loans:
 
Owner
  
Non-owner
  
and Land
  
Commercial
  
1-4 Family
  
Consumer
       
Three months ended September 30, 2013
 
Occupied
  
Occupied (1)
  
Development
  
Loans
  
Residential
  
Loans
  
Unallocated
  
Total
 
Allowance for loan losses:
                        
Beginning balance
 $-  $45  $-  $-  $-  $21  $-  $66 
  Charge offs
  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
  Recoveries
  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
  Adjustments (2)
  -   -   -   -   -   (12)  -   (12)
  Provision
  -   -   -   -   -   (3)  -   (3)
Ending balance
 $-  $45  $-  $-  $-  $6  $-  $51 
 
17
 

 

 
   
Commercial
  
Commercial
                   
   
Real Estate
  
Real Estate
  
Construction
        
Other
       
Covered loans:
 
Owner
  
Non-owner
  
and Land
  
Commercial
  
1-4 Family
  
Consumer
       
Nine months ended September 30, 2013
 
Occupied
  
Occupied (1)
  
Development
  
Loans
  
Residential
  
Loans
  
Unallocated
  
Total
 
Allowance for loan losses:
                        
Beginning balance
 $-  $45  $-  $43  $-  $11  $-  $99 
  Charge offs
  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
  Recoveries
  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
  Adjustments (2)
  -   -   -   (35)  -   (4)  -   (39)
  Provision
  -   -   -   (8)  -   (1)  -   (9)
Ending balance
 $-  $45  $-  $-  $-  $6  $-  $51 
                                  
(1) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
 
(2) Represents the portion of decreased expected losses which is covered by the loss sharing agreement with the FDIC.
 
 
The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in non-covered loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
 
   
Commercial
  
Commercial
                   
   
Real Estate
  
Real Estate
  
Construction
        
Other
       
   
Owner
  
Non-owner
  
and Land
  
Commercial
  
1-4 Family
  
Consumer
       
Non-covered loans:
 
Occupied
  
Occupied (1)
  
Development (2)
  
Loans
  
Residential
  
Loans
  
Unallocated
  
Total
 
September 30, 2013
                        
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
                        
  Individually evaluated for impairment
 $118  $61  $300  $200  $440  $-  $-  $1,119 
  Collectively evaluated for impairment
  585   918   861   2,311   1,020   54   524   6,273 
Total ending allowance
 $703  $979  $1,161  $2,511  $1,460  $54  $524  $7,392 
                                  
Loans:
                                
  Individually evaluated for impairment
 $7,661  $1,331  $2,107  $4,327  $8,237  $-  $-  $23,663 
  Collectively evaluated for impairment
  92,521   160,524   29,765   101,632   64,088   1,300   -   449,830 
Total ending loan balances
 $100,182  $161,855  $31,872  $105,959  $72,325  $1,300  $-  $473,493 
                                  
December 31, 2012
                                
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
                                
  Individually evaluated for impairment
 $137  $260  $-  $-  $440  $-  $-  $837 
  Collectively evaluated for impairment
  795   1,214   970   2,110   723   33   285   6,130 
Total ending allowance
 $932  $1,474  $970  $2,110  $1,163  $33  $285  $6,967 
                                  
Loans:
                                
  Individually evaluated for impairment
 $3,455  $2,882  $2,981  $5,212  $9,159  $-  $-  $23,689 
  Collectively evaluated for impairment
  89,833   147,523   41,965   93,869   61,338   1,623   -   436,151 
Total ending loan balances
 $93,288  $150,405  $44,946  $99,081  $70,497  $1,623  $-  $459,840 
                                  
(1) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
                         
(2) Includes an allowance for a loan that was evaluated but not considered impaired at September 30, 2013.
                 

18
 

 


The following tables present the balance in the allowance for covered loan losses and the recorded investment in covered loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
 
   
Commercial
  
Commercial
                   
   
Real Estate
  
Real Estate
  
Construction
        
Other
       
   
Owner
  
Non-owner
  
and Land
  
Commercial
  
1-4 Family
  
Consumer
       
Covered loans:
 
Occupied
  
Occupied (1)
  
Development
  
Loans
  
Residential
  
Loans
  
Unallocated
  
Total
 
September 30, 2013
                        
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
                        
  Individually evaluated for impairment
 $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
  Collectively evaluated for impairment
  -   45   -   -   -   6   -   51 
Total ending allowance
 $-  $45  $-  $-  $-  $6  $-  $51 
                                  
Loans:
                                
  Individually evaluated for impairment
 $135  $1,432  $-  $43  $1,546  $-  $-  $3,156 
  Collectively evaluated for impairment
  1,483   5,122   4   1,119   42,844   85   -   50,657 
Total ending loan balances
 $1,618  $6,554  $4  $1,162  $44,390  $85  $-  $53,813 
                                  
December 31, 2012
                                
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
                                
  Individually evaluated for impairment
 $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
  Collectively evaluated for impairment
  -   45   -   43   -   11   -   99 
Total ending allowance
 $-  $45  $-  $43  $-  $11  $-  $99 
                                  
Loans:
                                
  Individually evaluated for impairment
 $138  $2,114  $1,108  $212  $1,555  $-  $-  $5,127 
  Collectively evaluated for impairment
  4,005   8,746   153   2,460   50,742   88   -   66,194 
Total ending loan balances
 $4,143  $10,860  $1,261  $2,672  $52,297  $88  $-  $71,321 
                                  
(1) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
      
 
Troubled Debt Restructurings

A modification is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if both of the following exist: (1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and (2) the Bank has granted a concession to the borrower.  The Bank determines that a borrower may be experiencing financial difficulty if the borrower is currently delinquent on any of its debt, or if the Bank is concerned that the borrower may not be able to perform in accordance with the current terms of the loan agreement in the foreseeable future.  Many aspects of the borrower’s financial situation are assessed when determining whether they are experiencing financial difficulty, particularly as it relates to commercial borrowers due to the complex nature of the loan structure, business/industry risk and borrower/guarantor structures.  Concessions may include the reduction of an interest rate at a rate lower than current market rate for a new loan with similar risk, extension of the maturity date, reduction of accrued interest, or principal forgiveness.  When evaluating whether a concession has been granted, the Bank also considers whether the borrower has provided additional collateral or guarantors and whether such additions adequately compensate the Bank for the restructured terms, or if the revised terms are consistent with those currently being offered to new loan customers.  The assessments of whether a borrower is experiencing (or is likely to experience) financial difficulty and whether a concession has been granted is subjective in nature and management’s judgment is required when determining whether a modification is a TDR.

Although each occurrence is unique to the borrower and is evaluated separately, for all portfolio segments, TDRs are typically modified through reduction in interest rates, reductions in payments, changing the payment terms from principal and interest to interest only, and/or extensions in term maturity.

19
 

 

 
Troubled debt restructurings as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 by class of loan consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
   
September 30, 2013
  
June 30, 2013
 
Commercial real estate - owner-occupied
 $710  $712 
Construction and land loans
  -   1,275 
          
Total troubled debt restructurings
 $710  $1,987 
 
As of September 30, 2013, we had one commercial real estate owner-occupied loan modified in a troubled debt restructuring with an unpaid principal balance of $710 thousand which was restructured by reducing the principal portion of the contractual principal and interest payment without modifying the interest rate.  This loan is 30-59 days delinquent as of September 30, 2013. There is no additional commitment to lend to this borrower.  At June 30, 2013, we reported one construction and land loan modified in a troubled debt restructuring with an unpaid principal balance of $1.3 million which had defaulted subsequent to restructuring and was a nonaccrual loan. This loan was transferred to other real estate owned during the third quarter of 2013.

Credit Quality Indicators

Through its system of internal controls Southern National evaluates and segments loan portfolio credit quality on a quarterly basis using regulatory definitions for Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful.  Special Mention loans are considered to be criticized.  Substandard and Doubtful loans are considered to be classified.  Southern National had no loans classified Doubtful at September 30, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

Special Mention loans are loans that have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention.  If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position.

Substandard loans may be inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged if any.  Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt.  They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful loans have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
 
20
 

 

 
As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows (in thousands):
 
September 30, 2013
 
Covered Loans
  
Non-covered Loans
  
Total Loans
   
Classified/
        
Special
           
Classified/
       
   
Criticized (1)
  
Pass
  
Total
  
Mention
  
Substandard (3)
  
Pass
  
Total
  
Criticized
  
Pass
  
Total
 
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $135  $1,483  $1,618  $807  $7,661  $91,714  $100,182  $8,603  $93,197  $101,800 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2) 
  1,432   5,122   6,554   117   1,331   160,407   161,855   2,880   165,529   168,409 
Construction and land development
  -   4   4   632   2,107   29,133   31,872   2,739   29,137   31,876 
Commercial loans
  43   1,119   1,162   32   4,327   101,600   105,959   4,402   102,719   107,121 
Residential 1-4 family
  1,546   42,844   44,390   179   8,237   63,909   72,325   9,962   106,753   116,715 
Other consumer loans
  -   85   85   -   -   1,300   1,300   -   1,385   1,385 
                                          
Total
 $3,156  $50,657  $53,813  $1,767  $23,663  $448,063  $473,493  $28,586  $498,720  $527,306 
                                          
 
December 31, 2012
 
Covered Loans
  
Non-covered Loans
  
Total Loans
 
   
Classified/
          
Special
              
Classified/
         
   
Criticized (1)
  
Pass
  
Total
  
Mention
  
Substandard (3)
  
Pass
  
Total
  
Criticized
  
Pass
  
Total
 
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $138  $4,005  $4,143  $821  $3,455  $89,012  $93,288  $4,414  $93,017  $97,431 
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (2) 
  2,114   8,746   10,860   -   2,882   147,523   150,405   4,996   156,269   161,265 
Construction and land development
  1,108   153   1,261   -   2,981   41,965   44,946   4,089   42,118   46,207 
Commercial loans
  212   2,460   2,672   32   5,212   93,837   99,081   5,456   96,297   101,753 
Residential 1-4 family
  1,555   50,742   52,297   -   9,159   61,338   70,497   10,714   112,080   122,794 
Other consumer loans
  -   88   88   -   -   1,623   1,623   -   1,711   1,711 
                                          
Total
 $5,127  $66,194  $71,321  $853  $23,689  $435,298  $459,840  $29,669  $501,492  $531,161 
                                          
(1) Credit quality is enhanced by a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC in the covered portfolio. The same credit quality indicators used in the non-covered portfolio are combined.
         
(2) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
 
(3) Includes SBA guarantees of $1.2 million and $2.6 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 , respectively.
 
 
5.    FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

Southern National is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.  These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit.  These instruments involve elements of credit and funding risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet.  Letters of credit are written conditional commitments issued by Southern National to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.  The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers.  We had letters of credit outstanding totaling $7.1 million and $10.3 million as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Our exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and letters of credit is based on the contractual amount of these instruments.  We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments. Unless noted otherwise, we do not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with credit risk.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract.  Commitments are made predominately for adjustable rate loans, and generally have fixed expiration dates of up to three months or other termination clauses and usually require payment of a fee.  Since many of the commitments may expire without being completely drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.  We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had unfunded lines of credit and undisbursed construction loan funds totaling $98.3 million and $82.5 million, respectively. We had approved loan commitments of $25.8 million at September 30, 2013, and we had no approved loan commitments as of December 31, 2012.  Virtually all of our unfunded lines of credit, undisbursed construction loan funds and approved loan commitments are variable rate.
 
21
 

 

 
6.     EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following is a reconciliation of the denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) computations (dollars in thousands, except per share data):
 
      
Weighted
    
      
Average
    
   
Income
  
Shares
  
Per Share
 
   
(Numerator)
  
(Denominator)
  
Amount
 
For the three months ended September 30, 2013
         
Basic EPS
 $1,780   11,590  $0.15 
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
  -   47   - 
Diluted EPS
 $1,780   11,637  $0.15 
              
For the three months ended September 30, 2012
            
Basic EPS
 $1,208   11,590  $0.10 
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
  -   7   - 
Diluted EPS
 $1,208   11,597  $0.10 
              
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013
            
Basic EPS
 $4,862   11,590  $0.42 
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
  -   35   - 
Diluted EPS
 $4,862   11,625  $0.42 
              
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012
            
Basic EPS
 $5,266   11,590  $0.45 
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
  -   4   - 
Diluted EPS
 $5,266   11,594  $0.45 
 
There were 668,468 and 680,206 anti-dilutive options and warrants for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Anti-dilutive options and warrants totaled 498,247 and 501,438 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.

7.    FAIR VALUE

ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:

Securities Available for Sale

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.  Level 1 securities would include highly liquid government bonds, mortgage products and exchange traded equities.  If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flow.  Level 2 securities would include U. S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions and certain corporate, asset-backed and other securities.  In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.  Currently, all of Southern National’s available-for-sale debt securities are considered to be Level 2 securities.
 
22
 

 

 
Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below:
 
      Fair Value Measurements Using
         Significant    
      Quoted Prices in   Other   Significant 
      Active Markets for   Observable   Unobservable 
  
Total at
   Identical Assets   Inputs   Inputs 
(dollars in thousands)
 
September 30, 2013
   (Level 1)   (Level 2)   (Level 3) 
Financial assets:
            
  Available for sale securities
            
   Obligations of states and political subdivisions
 $2,020  $-  $2,020  $- 
 
      Fair Value Measurements Using
         Significant    
      Quoted Prices in   Other   Significant 
      Active Markets for   Observable   Unobservable 
 
  Total at   Identical Assets   Inputs   Inputs 
 (dollars in thousands)  December 31, 2012   (Level 1)   (Level 2 )  (Level 3)  
Financial assets:                
 Available for sale securities                
   Obligations of states and political subdivisions
 $2,289  $-  $2,289  $- 
    FHLMC preferred stock
  102   102   -   - 
Total available-for-sale securities
 $2,391  $102  $2,289  $- 
 
Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-recurring Basis:

Trust Preferred Securities Classified as Held-to-Maturity

The base input in calculating fair value is a Bloomberg Fair Value Index yield curve for single issuer trust preferred securities which correspond to the ratings of the securities we own.  We also use composite rating indices to fill in the gaps where the bank rating indices did not correspond to the ratings in our portfolio.  When a bank index that matches the rating of our security is not available, we used the bank index that most closely matches the rating, adjusted by the spread between the composite index that most closely matches the security’s rating and the composite index with a rating that matches the bank index used.  Then, we use the adjusted index yield, which is further adjusted by a liquidity premium, as the discount rate to be used in the calculation of the present value of the same cash flows used to evaluate the securities for OTTI.  The liquidity premiums were derived in consultation with a securities advisor. The liquidity premiums we used ranged from 2% to 5%, and the adjusted discount rates ranged from 11.12% to 15.19% at September 30, 2013.   Due to current market conditions as well as the limited trading activity of these securities, the market value of the securities is highly sensitive to assumption changes and market volatility.  We have determined that our trust preferred securities are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
23
 

 

Other Residential Collateralized Mortgage Obligation Classified as Held-to Maturity
 
The fair value was estimated within Level 2 fair value hierarchy, as the fair value is based on either pricing models, quoted market prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows.  We have evaluated this security for potential impairment and, based on our review of the trustee report, shock analysis and current information regarding delinquencies, nonperforming loans and credit support, it has been determined that no OTTI charge for credit exists for the three months ended September 30, 2013.  The assumptions used in the analysis included a 3.4% prepayment speed, 10.2% default rate, a 47% loss severity and an accounting yield of 2.51% during the three months ended September 30, 2013.
 
Impaired Loans
 
Generally, we measure the impairment for impaired loans considering the fair value of the loan’s collateral (if the loan is collateral dependent).  Fair value of the loan’s collateral is determined by appraisals or other valuation which is then adjusted for the cost related to liquidation of the collateral.  Discounts have predominantly been in the range of 0% to 8.4%. In some cases liquidation expenses may be netted from the appraised value which may result in a 0% discount. Fair value is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. Non-covered loans identified as impaired totaled $23.7 million (including SBA guarantees of $1.2 million and HarVest loans of $365 thousand) as of September 30, 2013 with an allocated allowance for loan losses totaling $819 thousand compared to a carrying amount of $23.7 million (including SBA guarantees of $2.6 million) with an allocated allowance for loan losses totaling $837 thousand at December 31, 2012.  Charge offs related to the impaired loans at September 30, 2013 totaled $923 thousand and $1.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to $963 thousand and $2.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.
 
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)
 
OREO is evaluated at the time of acquisition and recorded at fair value as determined by independent appraisal or internal market evaluation less cost to sell.  Discounts have predominantly been in the range of 0% to 6.6%. In some cases liquidation expenses may be netted from the appraised value which may result in a 0% discount. Fair value is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. OREO is further evaluated quarterly for any additional impairment.  At September 30, 2013, the total amount of OREO was $15.7 million, of which $12.7 million was non-covered (including $509 thousand acquired from HarVest) and $3.0 million was covered.
 
At December 31, 2012, the total amount of OREO was $13.8 million, of which $13.2 million was non-covered (including $744 thousand acquired from HarVest) and $636 thousand was covered.
 
24
 

 

 
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below:
 
      
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
         
Significant
    
      
Quoted Prices in
  
Other
  
Significant
 
      
Active Markets for
  
Observable
  
Unobservable
 
   
Total at
  
Identical Assets
  
Inputs
  
Inputs
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
September 30, 2013
  
(Level 1)
  
(Level 2)
  
(Level 3)
 
Impaired non-covered loans:
            
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
  7,543           7,543 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  1,270           1,270 
    Construction and land development
  2,107           2,107 
    Commercial loans
  4,127           4,127 
    Residential 1-4 family
  7,797           7,797 
Impaired covered loans:
                
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
  135           135 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  1,432           1,432 
    Commercial loans
  43           43 
    Residential 1-4 family
  1,546           1,546 
Non-covered other real estate owned:
                
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
  461           461 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  1,342           1,342 
    Construction and land development
  6,422           6,422 
    Residential 1-4 family
  4,510           4,510 
Covered other real estate owned:
                
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
  557           557 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  2,200           2,200 
    Commercial
  79           79 
    Residential 1-4 family
  127           127 
 
      
Fair Value Measurements Using
 
         
Significant
    
      
Quoted Prices in
  
Other
  
Significant
 
      
Active Markets for
  
Observable
  
Unobservable
 
   
Total at
  
Identical Assets
  
Inputs
  
Inputs
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
December 31, 2012
  
(Level 1)
  
(Level 2)
  
(Level 3)
 
Impaired non-covered loans:
            
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 $3,318          $3,318 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  2,622           2,622 
    Construction and land development
  2,981           2,981 
    Commercial loans
  5,212           5,212 
    Residential 1-4 family
  8,719           8,719 
Impaired covered loans:
                
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
  138           138 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  2,114           2,114 
    Construction and land development
  1,108           1,108 
    Commercial loans
  212           212 
    Residential 1-4 family
  1,555           1,555 
Non-covered other real estate owned:
                
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
  461           461 
    Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied (1)
  1,342           1,342 
    Construction and land development
  6,484           6,484 
    Residential 1-4 family
  4,913           4,913 
Covered other real estate owned:
                
    Commercial real estate - owner occupied
  557           557 
    Commercial
  79           79 
 
(1) Includes loans secured by farmland and multi-family residential loans.
 
25
 

 

 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
The carrying amount, estimated fair values and fair value hierarchy levels (previously defined) of financial instruments were as follows (in thousands):
 
      
September 30, 2013
  
December 31, 2012
 
   
Fair Value
  
Carrying
  
Fair
  
Carrying
  
Fair
 
   
Hierarchy Level
  
Amount
  
Value
  
Amount
  
Value
 
                 
Financial assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
 
Level 1
  $32,350  $32,350  $39,200  $39,200 
Securities available for sale
 
See previous table
   2,020   2,020   2,391   2,391 
Securities held to maturity
 
Level 2 & Level 3
   80,831   76,117   84,051   84,827 
Stock in Federal Reserve Bank and Federal
                   
    Home Loan Bank
  n/a   5,240   n/a   6,212   n/a 
Net non-covered loans
 
Level 3
   464,823   469,389   451,757   457,906 
Net covered loans
 
Level 3
   53,766   58,699   71,328   77,976 
Accrued interest receivable
 
Level 2 & Level 3
   1,973   1,973   2,455   2,455 
FDIC indemnification asset
 
Level 3
   5,338   3,622   6,735   6,735 
Financial liabilities:
                    
Demand deposits
 
Level 1
   70,237   70,237   72,418   72,418 
Money market and savings accounts
 
Level 1
   150,114   150,114   172,851   172,851 
Certificates of deposit
 
Level 3
   325,603   327,075   305,708   308,160 
Securities sold under agreements to
                    
  repurchase and other short-term borrowings
 
Level 1
   20,481   20,481   33,411   33,411 
FHLB advances
 
Level 3
   30,250   30,908   30,250   31,380 
Accrued interest payable
 
Level 1 & Level 3
   390   390   258   258 
 
Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest receivable and payable, demand deposits, savings accounts, money market accounts, short-term debt, and variable rate loans that reprice frequently and fully.  For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans with infrequent repricing or repricing limits, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life. A discount for liquidity risk was not considered necessary in estimating the fair value of loans. It was not practicable to determine the fair value of Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.  Fair value of long-term debt is based on current rates for similar financing.  The fair value of the FDIC indemnification asset was determined by discounting estimated future cash flows using the long-term risk free rate plus a premium and represents the present value of our current expectation for recoveries from the FDIC on covered loans.  The fair value of off-balance-sheet items is not considered material.  The fair value of loans is not presented on an exit price basis.
 
8.    FDIC-ASSISTED ACQUISITION
 
On April 27, 2012, Sonabank entered into an agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to assume all of the deposits and certain assets of HarVest Bank of Maryland (“HarVest”) a state chartered non-Federal Reserve member commercial bank. HarVest operated four branches – North Rockville, Frederick, Germantown and Bethesda (all located in Maryland).
 
26
 

 

 
The assets and liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the April 27, 2012 acquisition date.  A summary of the net assets acquired from the FDIC is as follows (in thousands):
 
Assets
   
Cash and cash equivalents
 $21,704 
Consideration due from the FDIC
  25,553 
Investment securities
  38,379 
Loans
  64,966 
Loans held for sale
  7,568 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
  1,167 
Other real estate owned
  750 
Core deposit intangible
  179 
Other assets
  576 
Total assets acquired
 $160,842 
      
Liabilities
    
Deposits
 $140,484 
FHLB advances
  16,738 
Other liabilities
  136 
Total liabilities
 $157,358 
      
Net assets acquired (bargain purchase gain)
 $3,484 
 
A valuation of the acquired loans and core deposit intangible was performed with the assistance of a third-party valuation consultant.  The unpaid principal balance and fair value of performing loans was $67.4 million and $63.0 million, respectively.  The discount of $4.4 million will be accreted through interest income over the life of the loans in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 310-20.  The unpaid principal balance and estimated fair value of acquired and retained non-performing loans was $5.3 million and $1.9 million, respectively.  In accordance with ASC 310-30, the discount of $3.4 million for these credit impaired loans will not be accreted.
 
Because HarVest was a distressed financial institution that was seized by the FDIC, certain historical operating information is not available to us and the preparation of pro forma operating disclosures is not practicable.
 
The application of the acquisition method of accounting resulted in the recognition of a bargain purchase gain of $3.5 million, and the bargain purchase gain is equal to the amount by which the fair value of the net assets acquired exceeded the consideration transferred and is influenced significantly by the FDIC-assisted transaction process.  However, the acquired loans in the HarVest transaction are not covered by an indemnification agreement with the FDIC.

27
 

 


 ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Management’s discussion and analysis is presented to aid the reader in understanding and evaluating the financial condition and results of operations of SNBV.  This discussion and analysis should be read with the consolidated financial statements, the footnotes thereto, and the other financial data included in this report and in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.  Results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained for any other period.
 
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
Statements and financial discussion and analysis contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical fact constitute forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and involve a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. The words “believe,” “may,” “should,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “continue,” “would,” “could,” “hope,” “might,” “assume,” “objective,” “seek,” “plan,” “strive” and similar words, or the negatives of these words, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.
 
Many possible events or factors could affect our future financial results and performance and could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations of future results we express or imply in any forward-looking statements. In addition to the Risk Factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, factors that could contribute to those differences include, but are not limited to:
 
 
the effects of future economic, business and market conditions and changes, domestic and foreign;
 
changes in the local economies in our market areas adversely affect our customers and their ability to transact profitable business with us, including the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans according to their terms or a change in the value of the related collateral;
 
changes in the availability of funds resulting in increased costs or reduced liquidity;
 
a deterioration or downgrade in the credit quality and credit agency ratings of the securities in our securities portfolio;
 
impairment concerns and risks related to our investment portfolio of collateralized mortgage obligations, agency mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions and pooled trust preferred securities;
 
the incurrence and possible impairment of goodwill associated with an acquisition and possible adverse short-term effects on our results of operations;
 
increased credit risk in our assets and increased operating risk caused by a material change in commercial, consumer and/or real estate loans as a percentage of our total loan portfolio;
 
the concentration of our loan portfolio in loans collateralized by real estate;
 
our level of construction and land development and commercial real estate loans;
 
changes in the levels of loan prepayments and the resulting effects on the value of our loan portfolio;
 
the failure of assumptions and estimates underlying the establishment of and provisions made to the allowance for loan losses;
 
our ability to expand and grow our business and operations, including the establishment of additional branches and acquisition of additional branches and banks, and our ability to realize the cost savings and revenue enhancements we expect from such activities;
 
28
 

 

 
 
changes in governmental monetary and fiscal policies, including interest rate policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, or changes in interest rates and market prices, which could reduce our net interest margins, asset valuations and expense expectations;
 
increased competition for deposits and loans adversely affecting rates and terms;
 
the continued service of key management personnel;
 
the potential payment of interest on demand deposit accounts to effectively compete for customers;
 
potential environmental liability risk associated with lending activities;
 
increased asset levels and changes in the composition of assets and the resulting impact on our capital levels and regulatory capital ratios;
 
risks of mergers and acquisitions, including the related time and cost of implementing transactions and the potential failure to achieve expected gains, revenue growth or expense savings;
 
legislative and regulatory changes, including changes in banking, securities and tax laws and regulations and their application by our regulators, including those associated with the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and changes in the scope and cost of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance and other coverage;
 
increases in regulatory capital requirements for banking organizations generally, which may adversely affect our ability to expand our business or could cause us to shrink our business;
 
the effects of war or other conflicts, acts of terrorism or other catastrophic events that may affect general economic conditions;
 
changes in accounting policies, rules and practices and applications or determinations made thereunder;
 
the risk that our deferred tax assets could be reduced if future taxable income  is less than currently estimated, if corporate tax rates in the future are less than current rates,  or if sales of our capital stock trigger limitations on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that we may utilize for income tax purposes; and
 
other factors and risks described under “Risk Factors” herein and in any of our subsequent reports that we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or “SEC”) under the Exchange Act.
 
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or results. A forward-looking statement may include a statement of the assumptions or bases underlying the forward-looking statement. We believe we have chosen these assumptions or bases in good faith and that they are reasonable. We caution you, however, that assumptions or bases almost always vary from actual results, and the differences between assumptions or bases and actual results can be material. When considering forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the risk factors and other cautionary statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. These statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly these statements in light of new information or future events.
 
29
 

 

 
OVERVIEW
 
Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (“Southern National”) is a corporation formed on July 28, 2004 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia and is the holding company for Sonabank (“Sonabank”) a Virginia state chartered bank which commenced operations on April 14, 2005.  The principal activities of Sonabank are to attract deposits and originate loans as permitted under applicable banking regulations.  Sonabank has fifteen branches in Virginia, located in Fairfax County (Reston, McLean and Fairfax), in Charlottesville, Warrenton (2), Middleburg, Leesburg (2), South Riding, Front Royal, New Market, Haymarket,  Richmond and Clifton Forge, and five branches in Maryland, in Rockville, Shady Grove, Germantown, Frederick and Bethesda.  We have administrative offices in Warrenton and an executive office in Georgetown, Washington, D.C where senior management is located.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
Net Income
 
Net income for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 was $1.8 million and $4.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. That compares to $1.2 million and $5.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012.
 
Net Interest Income
 
Our operating results depend primarily on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest and dividend income on interest-earning assets such as loans and investments, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and borrowings.
 
Net interest income was $7.7 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2013 down from $8.1 million during the same period last year. Sonabank’s net interest margin was 4.85% in the third quarter of 2013, down from 5.14% in the third quarter of 2012. Loan pricing at the margin has been brutally competitive as we wrote in the first quarter of 2013. It diminished somewhat in the second quarter but has intensified in the third. The competition seems to follow with a lag where the 10 year Treasury is trading. Average loans were $521.6 million in the third quarter compared to $505.1 in the second quarter of 2013 and $541.4 during the third quarter of 2012.
 
Net interest income was $22.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $23.6 million during the same period in the prior year. Average loans during the first nine months of 2013 were $513.6 million compared to $523.2 million during the same period last year. The Greater Atlantic Bank loan discount accretion contributed $1.2 million to net interest income during the first nine months of 2013, compared to $2.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The loan discount accretion on the HarVest Bank portfolio contributed $1.5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $412 thousand from the acquisition in the second quarter of 2012 through September 30, 2012.
 
30
 

 

 
The following table details average balances of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the amount of interest earned/paid on such assets and liabilities, and the yield/rate for the periods indicated:

   
Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest
 
   
Analysis For the Quarters Ended
 
   
9/30/2013
  
9/30/2012
 
      
Interest
        
Interest
    
   
Average
  
Income/
  
Yield/
  
Average
  
Income/
  
Yield/
 
   
Balance
  
Expense
  
Rate
  
Balance
  
Expense
  
Rate
 
   
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
Assets
                  
Interest-earning assets:
                  
Loans, net of unearned income (1) (2)
 $521,569  $8,169   6.21% $541,405  $9,008   6.62%
Investment securities
  84,200   574   2.73%  69,802   490   2.81%
Other earning assets
  26,617   104   1.55%  17,520   102   2.32%
                          
Total earning assets
  632,386   8,847   5.55%  628,727   9,600   6.07%
Allowance for loan losses
  (7,896)          (7,246)        
Total non-earning assets
  71,941           71,482         
Total assets
 $696,431          $692,963         
                          
Liabilities and stockholders equity
                        
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                        
NOW accounts
 $22,720   15   0.26% $19,460   13   0.27%
Money market accounts
  141,317   97   0.27%  167,313   333   0.79%
Savings accounts
  12,823   19   0.59%  8,926   13   0.58%
Time deposits
  319,201   835   1.04%  290,432   945   1.29%
Total interest-bearing deposits
  496,061   966   0.77%  486,131   1,304   1.07%
Borrowings
  45,513   157   1.37%  54,879   165   1.20%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
  541,574   1,123   0.82%  541,010   1,469   1.08%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
                        
  Demand deposits
  43,449           44,117         
  Other liabilities
  5,598           3,909         
Total liabilities
  590,621           589,036         
Stockholders equity
  105,810           103,927         
Total liabilities and stockholders
                        
  equity
 $696,431          $692,963         
Net interest income
      7,724           8,131     
Interest rate spread
          4.73%          4.99%
Net interest margin
          4.85%          5.14%
 
(1)  Includes loan fees in both interest income and the calculation of the yield on loans.
(2)  Calculations include non-accruing loans in average loan amounts outstanding.
 
31
 

 

 
   
Average Balance Sheets and Net Interest
 
   
Analysis For the Nine Months Ended
 
   
9/30/2013
  
9/30/2012
 
      
Interest
        
Interest
    
   
Average
  
Income/
  
Yield/
  
Average
  
Income/
  
Yield/
 
   
Balance
  
Expense
  
Rate
  
Balance
  
Expense
  
Rate
 
   
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
Assets
                  
Interest-earning assets:
                  
Loans, net  of unearned income (1) (2)
 $513,577  $24,277   6.32% $523,182  $26,387   6.74%
Investment securities
  84,095   1,699   2.69%  59,976   1,401   3.11%
Other earning assets
  41,230   443   1.44%  16,689   247   1.98%
                          
Total earning assets
  638,902   26,419   5.53%  599,847   28,035   6.24%
Allowance for loan losses
  (7,619)          (7,075)        
Total non-earning assets
  71,558           71,758         
Total assets
 $702,841          $664,530         
                          
Liabilities and stockholders equity
                        
Interest-bearing liabilities:
                        
NOW accounts
 $23,520   46   0.26% $18,431   46   0.33%
Money market accounts
  151,889   411   0.36%  159,859   959   0.80%
Savings accounts
  11,232   48   0.57%  7,873   35   0.60%
Time deposits
  315,522   2,581   1.09%  277,455   2,763   1.33%
Total interest-bearing deposits
  502,163   3,086   0.82%  463,618   3,803   1.10%
Borrowings
  46,182   465   1.35%  51,270   628   1.64%
Total interest-bearing liabilities
  548,345   3,551   0.87%  514,888   4,431   1.15%
Noninterest-bearing liabilities:
                        
  Demand deposits
  44,313           40,986         
  Other liabilities
  5,380           6,694         
Total liabilities
  598,038           562,568         
Stockholders' equity
  104,803           101,962         
Total liabilities and stockholders'
                        
  equity
 $702,841          $664,530         
Net interest income
     $22,868          $23,604     
Interest rate spread
          4.66%          5.09%
Net interest margin
          4.79%          5.26%
 
(1) Includes loan fees in both interest income and the calculation of the yield on loans.
(2) Calculations include non-accruing loans in average loan amounts outstanding.
 
Provision for Loan Losses
 
The provision for loan losses is a current charge to earnings made in order to increase the allowance for loan losses to a level deemed appropriate by management based on an evaluation of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions, changes in the nature and volume of lending, historical loan experience and other known internal and external factors affecting loan collectability.  Our loan loss allowance is calculated by segmenting the loan portfolio by loan type and applying historical loss factors to each segment.  The historical loss factors may be qualitatively adjusted by considering regulatory and peer data, and the application of management’s judgment.
 
The provision for loan losses in the third quarter of 2013 was $1.2 million, down from $1.8 million in the third quarter of 2012. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the provision for loan losses was $3.0 million compared to $4.6 million for the same period last year.
 
Net charge offs during the quarter ended September 30, 2013 were $1.0 million compared to $1.6 million during the third quarter of 2012. Net charge offs during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were $2.6 million compared to $4.0 million during the same period last year.
 
32
 

 

 
Noninterest Income
 
The following tables present the major categories of noninterest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:
 
   
For the Three Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
 
   
2013
  
2012
  
Change
 
   
(dollars in thousands)
 
Account maintenance and deposit service fees
 $198  $222  $(24)
Income from bank-owned life insurance
  147   148   (1)
Net gain on sale of available for sale securities
  -   287   (287)
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
  -   (480)  480 
Other
  30   63   (33)
    Total noninterest income
 $375  $240  $135 
              
   
For the Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
 
    2013   2012  
Change
 
   
(dollars in thousands)
 
Account maintenance and deposit service fees
 $593  $624  $(31)
Income from bank-owned life insurance
  445   649   (204)
Bargain purchase gain on acquisition
  -   3,484   (3,484)
Gain on sale of loans
  -   657   (657)
Gain on other assets
  13   14   (1)
Net gain on sale of available for sale securities
  142   274   (132)
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
  (3)  (717)  714 
Other
  169   198   (29)
    Total noninterest income
 $1,359  $5,183  $(3,824)
 
 
During the third quarter of 2013 we had noninterest income of $375 thousand compared to noninterest income of $240 thousand during the third quarter of 2012. The increase was primarily related to OTTI charges on trust preferred securities in the amount of $480 thousand which was partially offset by a gain on the sale of SBA pooled securities in the amount of $287 thousand during the third quarter of 2012.
 
Noninterest income decreased to $1.4 million in the first nine months of 2013 from $5.2 million in the first nine months of 2012. The decrease resulted primarily from the bargain purchase gain of $3.5 million from the HarVest transaction in the second quarter of 2012. In addition, there were OTTI charges of $717 thousand in trust preferred securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $3 thousand in OTTI charges during the first nine months of 2013. Income from bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) contributed $445 thousand during the first nine months of 2013 compared to $649 thousand the same period in 2012. The first nine months of 2012 was affected by a death benefit. Also, during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the bank sold the guaranteed portions of SBA loans and realized a $657 thousand gain.
 
33
 

 

 
Noninterest Expense

The following table presents the major categories of noninterest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:
    
   
For the Three Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
 
   
2013
  
2012
  
Change
 
   
(dollars in thousands)
 
 Salaries and benefits
 $2,338  $2,073  $265 
 Occupancy expenses
  768   753   15 
 Furniture and equipment expenses
  197   149   48 
 Amortization of core deposit intangible
  123   236   (113)
 Virginia franchise tax expense
  115   145   (30)
 Merger expenses
  -   11   (11)
 FDIC assessment
  218   146   72 
 Data processing expense
  131   175   (44)
 Telephone and communication expense
  166   183   (17)
 Change in FDIC indemnification asset
  113   242   (129)
 Net gain on other real estate owned
  (698)  (24)  (674)
 Other operating expenses
  790   665   125 
    Total noninterest expense
 $4,261  $4,754  $(493)
              
   
For the Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
 
    2013   2012  
Change
 
   
(dollars in thousands)
 
 Salaries and benefits
 $6,760  $5,868  $892 
 Occupancy expenses
  2,280   2,040   240 
 Furniture and equipment expenses
  524   448   76 
 Amortization of core deposit intangible
  368   694   (326)
 Virginia franchise tax expense
  357   436   (79)
 Merger expenses
  -   360   (360)
 FDIC assessment
  676   417   259 
 Data processing expense
  433   474   (41)
 Telephone and communication expense
  507   418   89 
 Change in FDIC indemnification asset
  350   481   (131)
 Net (gain) loss on other real estate owned
  (580)  2,376   (2,956)
 Other operating expenses
  2,334   2,417   (83)
    Total noninterest expense
 $14,009  $16,429  $(2,420)
 
34
 

 

 
Noninterest expenses were $4.3 million and $14.0 million during the third quarter and the first nine months of 2013, respectively, compared to $4.8 million and $16.4 million during the same periods in 2012.  When we purchased HarVest during the second quarter of 2012 we established a fair market value on its OREO of $750 thousand which was the bid for the OREO from the buyer of the HarVest loans which we sold. We allocated all of that to a single property which we believed to be the most likely to sell. That property has not yet sold, and during the third quarter of 2013 we recognized impairment in the value of the property in the amount of $200 thousand. But this quarter we did sell two properties which had negligible carrying value for a gain of $1.1 million. This was partially offset by the recognition of impairment in the value of two other properties in the amount of $200 thousand.

Noninterest expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, included the recognition of impairment in the values of five OREO properties in the Charlottesville market and one in the Culpeper market in the amount of $2.2 million. Also affecting the second quarter of 2012 were merger expenses relating to the HarVest transaction totaling $360 thousand. Occupancy and furniture and equipment expenses were $2.8 million during the first nine months of 2013, compared to $2.5 million during 2012. Of this increase, $379 thousand resulted from operating five additional branches, four from the HarVest acquisition and one denovo.  In addition, salaries and benefits expense has increased $892 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, compared to 2012 due to the HarVest acquisition and other additional personnel.   Full-time equivalent employees have increased from 138 at September 30, 2012, to 140 at September 30, 2013. Audit and accounting fees, which are included in “other operating expenses”, have decreased from $680 thousand during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to $351 thousand during the first nine months of 2013.  These fees were abnormally high in 2012 because of the restatement of 2010 and 2009 financial statements.
This decrease was partially offset by increases in foreclosure related expenses.

The efficiency ratio was 60.60% during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to 56.48% during the first nine months of 2012.

FINANCIAL CONDITION
 
Balance Sheet Overview

Total assets were $707.9 million as of September 30, 2013 compared to $723.8 million as of December 31, 2012.  Loans receivable, net of deferred fees, decreased from $530.1 million at the end of 2012 to $526.0 million at September 30, 2013. Within that total, covered loans declined by $17.5 million while the non-covered loan portfolio increased by $13.4 million.

Total deposits were $546.0 million at September 30, 2013 compared to $551.0 million at December 31, 2012. Certificates of deposit increased $19.9 million during the nine months.  This was offset by a decrease in money market accounts of $27.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.  Noninterest-bearing deposits were $46.5 million at September 30, 2013 and $49.6 million at December 31, 2012.  Noninterest-bearing deposits were historically high at December 31, 2012, primarily because of large balances held by title companies.

Loan Portfolio

As part of the Greater Atlantic acquisition, the Bank and the FDIC entered into a loss sharing agreement on approximately $143.4 million (contractual basis) of Greater Atlantic Bank’s assets.  The Bank will share in the losses on the loans and foreclosed loan collateral with the FDIC as specified in the loss sharing agreement; we refer to these assets collectively as “covered assets.”  Loans that are not covered in the loss sharing agreement are referred to as “non-covered loans.”
 
35
 

 


The following table summarizes the composition of our loan portfolio as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
                   
   
Covered
  
Non-covered
  
Total
  
Covered
  
Non-covered
  
Total
 
   
Loans (1)
  
Loans
  
Loans
  
Loans (1)
  
Loans
  
Loans
 
   
September 30, 2013
  
December 31, 2012
 
 Loans secured by real estate:
                  
Commercial real estate - owner-occupied
 $1,618  $100,182  $101,800  $4,143  $93,288  $97,431 
Commercial real estate - non-owner-occupied
  5,863   139,773   145,636   10,246   130,152   140,398 
Secured by farmland
  101   512   613   -   1,479   1,479 
Construction and land loans
  4   31,872   31,876   1,261   44,946   46,207 
Residential 1-4 family
  17,933   65,658   83,591   21,005   61,319   82,324 
Multi- family residential
  590   21,570   22,160   614   18,774   19,388 
Home equity lines of credit
  26,457   6,667   33,124   31,292   9,178   40,470 
Total real estate loans
  52,566   366,234   418,800   68,561   359,136   427,697 
                          
Commercial loans
  1,162   105,959   107,121   2,672   99,081   101,753 
Consumer loans
  85   1,300   1,385   88   1,623   1,711 
Gross loans
  53,813   473,493   527,306   71,321   459,840   531,161 
                          
Less deferred fees on loans
  4   (1,278)  (1,274)  7   (1,017)  (1,010)
Loans, net of deferred fees
 $53,817  $472,215  $526,032  $71,328  $458,823  $530,151 
                          
(1) Covered Loans were acquired in the Greater Atlantic transaction and are covered under an FDIC loss-share agreement.
  
 
As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, substantially all of our loans were to customers located in Virginia and Maryland.  We are not dependent on any single customer or group of customers whose insolvency would have a material adverse effect on operations.

Loans, net of deferred fees, decreased $4.1 million from $530.2 million at the end of 2012 to $526.0 million at September 30, 2013, but increased $16.0 million from March 31, 2013.  We had payoffs of large loans of approximately $19.8 million and $5.1 million in foreclosures during the last two quarters. However, that was offset during the second and third quarters by very strong loan closings of $57.0 million.

Asset Quality

We will generally place a loan on nonaccrual status when it becomes 90 days past due.  Loans will also be placed on nonaccrual status in cases where we are uncertain whether the borrower can satisfy the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Cash payments received while a loan is categorized as nonaccrual will be recorded as a reduction of principal as long as doubt exists as to future collections.

We maintain appraisals on loans secured by real estate, particularly those categorized as nonperforming loans and potential problem loans.  In instances where appraisals reflect reduced collateral values, we make an evaluation of the borrower’s overall financial condition to determine the need, if any, for impairment or write-down to their fair values.  If foreclosure occurs, we record other real estate owned at the lower of our recorded investment in the loan or fair value less our estimated costs to sell.

Our loss and delinquency experience on our loan portfolio has been limited by a number of factors, including our underwriting standards and the relatively short period of time since the loans were originated.  Whether our loss and delinquency experience in the area of our portfolio will increase significantly depends upon the value of the real estate securing loans and economic factors such as the overall economy of the region.
 
36
 

 

 
Non-covered Loans and Assets

Non-covered loans evaluated for impairment totaled $23.7 million with allocated allowance for loan losses in the amount of $819 thousand as of September 30, 2013, including $5.3 million of nonaccrual loans. This compares to $23.7 million of impaired loans with allocated allowance for loan losses in the amount of $837 thousand at December 31, 2012, including $7.6 million of nonaccrual loans. The nonaccrual loans included SBA guaranteed amounts of $1.2 million and $2.6 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 there were no loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest.

Non-covered nonperforming assets decreased from $20.8 million at December 31, 2012 to $18.1 million at September 30, 2013.

Non-covered OREO as of September 30, 2013 was $12.7 million compared to $13.2 million as of the end of the previous year. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 we had two foreclosures in the non-covered portfolio in the amount of $1.4 million and OREO sales of $1.4 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 we had six foreclosures in the non-covered portfolio totaling $3.1 million and OREO sales of $3.9 million.

Sonabank has an internal loan review and a loan committee, both of which provide on-going monitoring to identify and address issues with problem loans.  The loan loss provision is determined after consideration of all known relevant internal and external factors affecting loan collectability to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level necessary to absorb estimated credit losses. While charge-offs on loans are down significantly overall, we have experienced an increase in past due loans in our 1-4 family residential portfolio primarily attributable to one large single family loan. Based primarily on this uncertainty, we feel it prudent at this time to continue to maintain an elevated overall allowance for loan loss percentage and coverage ratio as noted in the table below. We believe the allowance for loan losses is sufficient to cover probable incurred credit losses at September 30, 2013.

The following table presents a comparison of non-covered nonperforming assets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
       
   
September 30,
  
December 31,
 
   
2013
  
2012
 
        
Nonaccrual loans
 $5,322  $7,628 
Loans past due 90 days and accruing interest
  -   - 
    Total nonperforming loans
  5,322   7,628 
Other real estate owned
  12,736   13,200 
    Total nonperforming assets
 $18,058  $20,828 
          
SBA guaranteed amounts included in nonaccrual loans
 $1,237  $2,607 
          
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
  138.90%  91.33%
Allowance for loan losses to total non-covered loans
  1.57%  1.52%
Nonperforming assets excluding SBA guaranteed loans to total non-covered assets
  2.58%  2.80%
 
37
 

 

 
A modification is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if both of the following exist: (1) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and (2) the Bank has granted a concession to the borrower.  The Bank determines that a borrower may be experiencing financial difficulty if the borrower is currently delinquent on any of its debt, or if the Bank is concerned that the borrower may not be able to perform in accordance with the current terms of the loan agreement in the foreseeable future.  Many aspects of the borrower’s financial situation are assessed when determining whether they are experiencing financial difficulty, particularly as it relates to commercial borrowers due to the complex nature of the loan structure, business/industry risk and borrower/guarantor structures.  Concessions may include the reduction of an interest rate at a rate lower than current market rate for a new loan with similar risk, extension of the maturity date, reduction of accrued interest, or principal forgiveness.  When evaluating whether a concession has been granted, the Bank also considers whether the borrower has provided additional collateral or guarantors and whether such additions adequately compensate the Bank for the restructured terms, or if the revised terms are consistent with those currently being offered to new loan customers.  The assessments of whether a borrower is experiencing (or is likely to experience) financial difficulty and whether a concession has been granted is subjective in nature and management’s judgment is required when determining whether a modification is a TDR.

Although each occurrence is unique to the borrower and is evaluated separately, for all portfolio segments, TDRs are typically modified through reduction in interest rates, reductions in payments, changing the payment terms from principal and interest to interest only, and/or extensions in term maturity.

Troubled debt restructurings as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013 by class of loan consisted of the following (in thousands):
       
   
September 30, 2013
  
June 30, 2013
 
Commercial real estate - owner-occupied
 $710  $712 
Construction and land loans
  -   1,275 
          
Total troubled debt restructurings
 $710  $1,987 
 
As of September 30, 2013, we had one commercial real estate owner-occupied loan modified in a troubled debt restructuring with an unpaid principal balance of $710 thousand which was restructured by reducing the principal portion of the contractual principal and interest payment without modifying the interest rate.  This loan is 30-59 days delinquent as of September 30, 2013. There is no additional commitment to lend to this borrower.  At June 30, 2013, we reported one construction and land loan modified in a troubled debt restructuring with an unpaid principal balance of $1.3 million which had defaulted subsequent to restructuring and was a nonaccrual loan. This loan was transferred to other real estate owned during the third quarter of 2013.

Covered Loans and Assets

Covered loans identified as impaired totaled $3.2 million as of September 30, 2013 and $5.1 million at December 31, 2012. Nonaccrual loans were $1.6 million and $3.6 million at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, there were no loans past due 90 days or more and accruing interest.

Covered OREO as of September 30, 2013 was $3.0 million compared to $636 thousand as of the end of 2012. In the covered portfolio we had one foreclosure during the three months ended September 30, 2013 in the amount of $127 thousand and during the nine months had three foreclosures totaling $4.2 million.  In the second quarter of 2013, we sold the property foreclosed on in the first quarter of 2013 for $1.9 million which resulted in a small gain.
 
38
 

 


Securities

Investment securities, available for sale and held to maturity, were $82.9 million at September 30, 2013 and $86.4 million at December 31, 2012.

Investment activity during the first nine months of 2013 was concentrated on municipal bonds (as it was in the fourth quarter of 2012) and to a lesser extent on callable agencies. The yields available on FNMA and FHLMC mortgage pass through securities where we have historically invested excess cash have been adversely affected by the Federal Reserve Board’s third round of quantitative easing and its purchases of $40 billion a month in mortgage-backed securities. The yields on higher quality, bank qualified municipal bonds have been significantly higher on a taxable equivalent basis although they do entail some extension risk. We went into the strategy of investing in municipals with an overall asset sensitive balance sheet and are monitoring it to ensure we do not get outside our risk tolerance level. Through the end of the third quarter of 2013, we had assembled a portfolio of $13.0 million with a taxable equivalent yield of 3.02% and ratings as follows:
     
Rating
   
Amount
 
Service
Rating
 
(in thousands)
 
Moody’s
Aaa    
 $505 
Moody’s
Aa2    
  3,206 
Moody’s
Aa3    
  723 
Standard & Poor’s
AAA  
  2,673 
Standard & Poor’s
AA     
  3,676 
Standard & Poor’s
AA-   
  2,228 
     $13,011 
  
In accordance with regulatory guidance we have performed an independent analysis on each security and monitor the portfolio on an ongoing basis.

As of September 30, 2013 we owned pooled trust preferred securities as follows:
                                  
                             
Previously
    
                          
% of Current
  
Recognized
    
                          
Defaults and
  
Cumulative
    
     
Ratings
              
Estimated
  
Deferrals to
  
Other
    
 
Tranche
 
When Purchased
  
Current Ratings
     
Fair
  
Total
  
Comprehensive
    
Security
Level
 
Moody's
  
Fitch
  
Moody's
  
Fitch
  
Par Value
  
Book Value
  
Value
  
Collateral
  
Loss (1)
    
                 
(in thousands)
          
ALESCO VII  A1B
Senior
 
Aaa
  
AAA
  
Baa3
  
BB
  $6,654  $6,020  $4,077   16% $281    
MMCF III B
Senior Sub
 A3  A-  
Ba1
  
CC
   421   413   241   30%  8    
                  7,075   6,433   4,318      $289    
                                       
                                 
Cumulative Other
  
Cumulative
 
                                 
Comprehensive
  
OTTI Related to
 
Other Than Temporarily Impaired:
                               
Loss (2)
  
Credit Loss (2)
 
TPREF FUNDING II
Mezzanine
 A1  A-   
Caa3
  C   1,500   515   512   41%  626  $359 
TRAP 2007-XII C1
Mezzanine
 A3  A   C  C   2,140   56   104   39%  791   1,293 
TRAP 2007-XIII D
Mezzanine
 
NR
  A-   
NR
  C   2,039   -   76   29%  7   2,032 
MMC FUNDING XVIII
Mezzanine
 A3  A-   
Ca
  C   1,084   27   239   30%  366   691 
ALESCO V C1
Mezzanine
 A2  A   C  C   2,150   475   586   18%  1,014   661 
ALESCO XV C1
Mezzanine
 A3  A-   C  C   3,222   30   105   35%  633   2,559 
ALESCO XVI  C
Mezzanine
 A3  A-   C  C   2,143   119   572   15%  844   1,180 
                   14,278   1,222   2,194      $4,281  $8,775 
                                         
Total
                $21,353  $7,655  $6,512             
 
(1)  Pre-tax, and represents unrealized losses at date of transfer from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity, net of accretion
(2)  Pre-tax
 
39
 

 

 
Each of these securities has been evaluated for potential impairment under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 325.  In performing a detailed cash flow analysis of each security, Sonabank works with independent third parties to identify the most reflective estimate of the cash flow estimated to be collected. If this estimate results in a present value of expected cash flows that is less than the amortized cost basis of a security (that is, credit loss exists), an OTTI is considered to have occurred. If there is no credit loss, any impairment is considered temporary.

We recognized no OTTI charges during the third quarter of 2013 and recognized OTTI charges of $3 thousand during the first nine months of 2013 compared to OTTI charges related to credit on the trust preferred securities totaling $480 thousand and $717 thousand during the same periods of 2012.
 
 
Liquidity and Funds Management

The objective of our liquidity management is to assure the ability to meet our financial obligations. These obligations include the payment of deposits on demand or at maturity, the repayment of borrowings at maturity and the ability to fund commitments and other new business opportunities. We obtain funding from a variety of sources, including customer deposit accounts, customer certificates of deposit and payments on our loans and investments. Historically, our level of core deposits has been insufficient to fully fund our lending activities. As a result, we have sought funding from additional sources, including institutional certificates of deposit and the sale of available-for-sale investment securities. In addition, we maintain lines of credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and utilize securities sold under agreements to repurchase and reverse repurchase agreement borrowings from approved securities dealers.

We prepare a cash flow forecast for one year with the first three months prepared on a weekly basis and on a monthly basis thereafter. The projections incorporate all scheduled maturities of loans excluding impaired loans and all scheduled maturities of out of area certificates of deposit. In addition, prepayments on investment securities are estimated by using a projection produced by our bond accounting system. To estimate loan growth over the one year period, the projection incorporates the scheduled loan closings in the Loan Pipeline Report along with other management estimates.
 
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we funded our financial obligations with deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. At September 30, 2013, we had $98.3 million of unfunded lines of credit and undisbursed construction loan funds. Our approved loan commitments were $25.8 million at September 30, 2013. Management anticipates that funding requirements for these commitments can be met from the normal sources of funds.
 
40
 

 

 
Capital Resources

The following table provides a comparison of our leverage and risk-weighted capital ratios and the leverage and risk-weighted capital ratios of the bank at the dates indicated to the minimum and well-capitalized regulatory standards (dollars in thousands):
             
         
Required
    
         
For Capital
  
To Be Categorized as
 
   
Actual
  
Adequacy Purposes
  
Well Capitalized
 
   
Amount
  
Ratio
  
Amount
  
Ratio
  
Amount
  
Ratio
 
September 30, 2013
                  
Southern National
                  
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
 $98,937   19.15% $20,661   4.00% $30,991   6.00%
Total risk-based capital ratio
  105,391   20.40%  41,321   8.00%  51,652   10.00%
Leverage ratio
  98,937   14.41%  27,471   4.00%  34,339   5.00%
Sonabank
                        
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
 $98,266   19.04% $20,650   4.00% $30,974   6.00%
Total risk-based capital ratio
  104,717   20.28%  41,299   8.00%  51,624   10.00%
Leverage ratio
  98,266   14.31%  27,459   4.00%  34,325   5.00%
                          
December 31, 2012
                        
Southern National
                        
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
 $95,539   18.33% $20,853   4.00% $31,280   6.00%
Total risk-based capital ratio
  102,048   19.57%  41,707   8.00%  52,133   10.00%
Leverage ratio
  95,539   13.69%  27,908   4.00%  34,884   5.00%
Sonabank
                        
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio
 $94,754   18.18% $20,842   4.00% $31,264   6.00%
Total risk-based capital ratio
  101,260   19.43%  41,685   8.00%  52,106   10.00%
Leverage ratio
  94,754   13.59%  27,896   4.00%  34,871   5.00%
  
The most recent regulatory notification categorized Sonabank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.  There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed Sonabank’s category.

In June 2012, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC proposed rules that would revise and replace the current capital rules to align with the Basel III capital standards and meet certain requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act.  In July 2013, the Federal Reserve approved revisions to its Basel III capital adequacy guidelines.  The final rule requires Southern National and Sonabank to comply with the following new minimum capital ratios, effective January 1, 2015:

(1) a new common equity tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets;
(2) a tier 1 capital ratio of 6% of risk-weighted assets (increased from 4%);
(3) a total capital ratio of 8% of risk-weighted assets (unchanged);
(4) a leverage ratio of 4% of average total assets (unchanged).
 
41
 

 

 
ITEM 3 – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are engaged primarily in the business of investing funds obtained from deposits and borrowings into interest-earning loans and investments.  Consequently, our earnings depend to a significant extent on our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income on loans and other investments and the interest expense on deposits and borrowings.  To the extent that our interest-bearing liabilities do not reprice or mature at the same time as our interest-earning assets, we are subject to interest rate risk and corresponding fluctuations in net interest income.  We have employed asset/liability management policies that seek to manage our interest income, without having to incur unacceptable levels of credit or investment risk.

We use simulation modeling to manage our interest rate risk, and we review quarterly interest sensitivity reports prepared for us by FTN Financial using the Sendero ALM Analysis System.  This approach uses a model which generates estimates of the change in our economic value of equity (EVE) over a range of interest rate scenarios.  EVE is the present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts using assumptions about estimated loan prepayment rates, reinvestment rates and deposit decay rates.

During the fourth quarter of 2012, we converted to an enhanced model with FTN Financial that uses detailed data on loans and deposits that is extracted directly from the loan and deposit applications and requires more detailed assumptions about interest rates on new volumes.  The new model also accommodates the analysis of floors, ceilings, etc. on a loan-by-loan basis.  The greater level of input detail provides more meaningful reports compared to the summarized input data previously used.
 
42
 

 

 
The following tables are based on an analysis prepared by FTN Financial setting forth an analysis of our interest rate risk as measured by the estimated change in EVE resulting from instantaneous and sustained parallel shifts in the yield curve (plus 400 basis points or minus 200 basis points, measured in 100 basis point increments) as of September 30, 2013 and as of December 31, 2012, and all changes are within our ALM Policy guidelines:
                 
   
Sensitivity of Economic Value of Equity
 
   
As of September 30, 2013
 
                 
            
Economic Value of
 
Change in
 
Economic Value of Equity
  
Equity as a % of
 
Interest Rates
               
in Basis Points
    
$ Change
  
% Change
  
Total
  
Equity
 
(Rate Shock)
 
Amount
  
From Base
  
From Base
  
Assets
  
Book Value
 
   
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
                 
Up 400
 $104,569  $(12,013)  -10.30%  14.77%  98.68%
Up 300
  106,882   (9,700)  -8.32%  15.10%  100.86%
Up 200
  110,097   (6,485)  -5.56%  15.55%  103.89%
Up 100
  114,955   (1,627)  -1.40%  16.24%  108.48%
Base
  116,582   -   0.00%  16.47%  110.01%
Down 100
  113,630   (2,952)  -2.53%  16.05%  107.23%
Down 200
  110,226   (6,356)  -5.45%  15.57%  104.01%
                      
   
Sensitivity of Economic Value of Equity
 
   
As of December 31, 2012
 
                      
               
Economic Value of
 
Change in
 
Economic Value of Equity
  
Equity as a % of
 
Interest Rates
                    
in Basis Points
     
$ Change
  
% Change
  
Total
  
Equity
 
(Rate Shock)
 
Amount
  
From Base
  
From Base
  
Assets
  
Book Value
 
   
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
                      
Up 400
 $105,710  $(11,198)  -9.58%  14.60%  102.46%
Up 300
  107,601   (9,307)  -7.96%  14.87%  104.29%
Up 200
  110,442   (6,466)  -5.53%  15.26%  107.04%
Up 100
  115,426   (1,482)  -1.27%  15.95%  111.87%
Base
  116,908   -   0.00%  16.15%  113.31%
Down 100
  111,153   (5,755)  -4.92%  15.36%  107.73%
Down 200
  111,252   (5,656)  -4.84%  15.37%  107.83%

43
 

 

 
Our interest rate sensitivity is also monitored by management through the use of a model run by FTN Financial that generates estimates of the change in the net interest income over a range of interest rate scenarios.  Net interest income depends upon the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rates earned or paid on them.  In this regard, the model assumes that the composition of our interest sensitive assets and liabilities existing at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 remains constant over the period being measured and also assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration to maturity or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. All changes are within our ALM Policy guidelines.
              
   
Sensitivity of Net Interest Income
 
   
As of September 30, 2013
 
              
Change in
 
Adjusted Net Interest Income
  
Net Interest Margin
 
Interest Rates
            
in Basis Points
    
$ Change
     
% Change
 
(Rate Shock)
 
Amount
  
From Base
  
Percent
  
From Base
 
   
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
 
              
Up 400
 $32,005  $6,047   4.78%  0.88%
Up 300
  30,024   4,066   4.49%  0.59%
Up 200
  28,150   2,192   4.22%  0.32%
Up 100
  26,762   804   4.02%  0.12%
Base
  25,958   -   3.90%  0.00%
Down 100
  25,963   5   3.90%  0.00%
Down 200
  25,645   (313)  3.85%  -0.05%
                  
   
Sensitivity of Net Interest Income
 
   
As of December 31, 2012
 
                  
Change in
 
Adjusted Net Interest Income
  
Net Interest Margin
 
Interest Rates
                
in Basis Points
     
$ Change
      
% Change
 
(Rate Shock)
 
Amount
  
From Base
  
Percent
  
From Base
 
   
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
                  
Up 400
 $34,211  $6,829   4.93%  0.97%
Up 300
  32,008   4,626   4.62%  0.66%
Up 200
  29,925   2,543   4.33%  0.37%
Up 100
  28,423   1,041   4.11%  0.15%
Base
  27,382   -   3.96%  0.00%
Down 100
  27,663   281   4.00%  0.04%
Down 200
  27,755   373   4.02%  0.06%

44
 

 

 
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodology used in the above interest rate risk measurements.  Modeling changes in EVE requires the making of certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates.  Accordingly, although the EVE tables and Sensitivity of Net Interest Income (NII) tables provide an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to, and do not, provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our net worth and net interest income.  Sensitivity of EVE and NII are modeled using different assumptions and approaches.  In the low interest rate environment that currently exists, limitations on downward adjustments for interest rates, particularly as they apply to deposits, can and do result in anomalies in scenarios that are unlikely to occur due to the current low interest rate environment.

45
 

 


 ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d -15(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).  Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Disclosure controls and procedures are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in Southern National’s internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Southern National and Sonabank may, from time to time, be a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business.  There are no proceedings pending, or to management’s knowledge, threatened, against Southern National or Sonabank as of September 30, 2013.

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

As of September 30, 2013 there were no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

ITEM 2. – UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Not applicable

ITEM 3. – DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable

ITEM 4. – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 Not applicable

ITEM 5. – OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable
 
46
 

 

 
ITEM 6 - EXHIBITS

 (a)   Exhibits. 
    
 Exhibit No. Description
    
 
31.1*
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
      
 
31.2*
 
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
      
 
32.1**
 
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
*Filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
**Furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
 
47
 

 

 
Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
     
  Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.  
  (Registrant)  
     
     
November 12, 2013 /s/ Georgia S. Derrico 
(Date) Georgia S. Derrico,  
  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
     
     
November 12, 2013 /s/ William H. Lagos 
(Date) William H. Lagos,  
  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
48