Realty Income - 10-Q quarterly report FY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (760) 741-2111

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES [ X ]     NO [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer [ X ]   Accelerated filer [   ]  Non-accelerated filer [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  [   ]   No  [ X ]

There were 101,071,994 shares of common stock outstanding as of July 30, 2007.

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

REALTY INCOME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

June 30, 2007

(unaudited)

The consolidated financial statements of Realty Income Corporation (“Realty Income”, the “Company”, “we” or “our”) were prepared from our books and records without audit and include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. Certain of the 2006 balances have been reclassified to conform to the 2007 presentation.  Readers of this quarterly report should refer to our audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, which are included in our 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as certain disclosures that would substantially duplicate those contained in the audited financial statements have not been included in this report.

At June 30, 2007, we owned 1,998 properties, located in 48 states, containing over 17.2 million leasable square feet, along with 29 properties owned by our wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary, Crest Net Lease, Inc. (“Crest”).  Crest was created to buy and sell properties, primarily to individual investors who are involved in tax-deferred exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Tax Code”).

A. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Realty Income, Crest and other entities for which we make operating and financial decisions (control), after elimination of all material intercompany balances and transactions.  All of Realty Income’s and Crest’s subsidiaries are wholly-owned.

B. We have elected to be taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) under the Tax Code. We believe we have qualified and continue to qualify as a REIT.  Under the REIT operating structure, we are permitted to deduct distributions paid to our stockholders and generally will not be required to pay federal corporate income taxes on such income. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal income taxes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, except for federal income taxes of Crest, which are included in discontinued operations.

C.  We recognize an allowance for doubtful accounts relating to accounts receivable for amounts deemed uncollectible.  We consider tenant specific issues such as financial stability and ability to pay rent when determining collectibility of accounts receivable and appropriate allowances to record.  The allowance for doubtful accounts at June 30, 2007 was $617,000 and at December 31, 2006 was $705,000.

D.  In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109.  Interpretation No. 48 applies to all tax positions accounted for under Statement No. 109 and clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by defining criteria that a tax position on an individual matter must meet before that position is recognized in the financial statements.  Interpretation No. 48 became effective for us at the beginning of 2007 and did not have an impact on our financial position or results of operations.

E.  We collect and remit sales taxes assessed by different governmental authorities that are both imposed on and concurrent with a revenue-producing transaction between us and our tenants. We report the collection of these taxes on a net basis (excluded from revenues). The amounts of these taxes are not significant to our financial position or results of operations.

We acquire land, buildings and improvements that are used by retail operators.

A.  During the first six months of 2007, Realty Income invested $98.3 million in 46 new retail properties and properties under development with an initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 8.6%.  These 46 properties are located in 12 states, will contain over 554,000 leasable square feet, and are 100% leased with an average lease term of 19.1 years.  The initial weighted average contractual lease rate is computed by dividing the estimated aggregate base rent for the first year of each lease by the estimated total cost of the properties.

Of the $98.3 million invested in the first six months of 2007, $7.1 million was used to acquire one property with an existing lease already in-place with a retail tenant.  In accordance with FASB Statement No. 141,Business Combinations, Realty Income recorded $1.0 million as the intangible value of the in-place lease and $689,000 as the intangible value of the below-market rents.  These amounts are recorded in “other assets” and “other liabilities,” respectively, on our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2007 and are amortized over the life of the lease.

In comparison, during the first six months of 2006, Realty Income and Crest invested $154.9 million, in aggregate, in 51 new retail properties and properties under development.  These 51 properties are located in 14 states, contain over 1.2 million leasable square feet, and are 100% leased with an average lease term of 18.0 years.  Of the $154.9 million invested in the first six months of 2006, Realty Income invested $146.2 million in 48 new retail properties and properties under development with an initial weighted average contractual lease rate of 8.8%.  These 48 properties are located in 14 states, contain over 1.1 million leasable square feet, and are 100% leased with an average lease term of 18.0 years.  During the first six months of 2006, Crest invested $8.7 million in three new retail properties.

B.  Crest’s property inventory at June 30, 2007 consisted of 29 properties with a total investment of $74.5 million and at December 31, 2006 consisted of 60 properties with a total investment of $137.5 million.  These amounts are included on our consolidated balance sheets in “real estate held for sale, net.”

We have a $300 million acquisition credit facility that expires in October 2008, unless extended as provided for in the credit facility agreement.  In April 2007, Moody’s Investors Service upgraded our credit ratings.  Effective May 1, 2007, our current investment grade credit ratings provided for financing under the credit facility at LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus 60 basis points with a facility fee of 15 basis points, for all-in drawn pricing of 75 basis points over LIBOR.  Prior to the credit rating upgrade by Moody’s Investors Service, financing under the credit facility was five basis points higher.

The average borrowing rate on our credit facility during the first six months of 2007 was 6.0%, compared to 5.3% in the first six months of 2006. The increase in the average borrowing rate is due to an increase in LIBOR during the past year. Our current credit facility is subject to various leverage and interest coverage ratio limitations. We are and have been in compliance with these covenants.

Our credit facility is unsecured and accordingly, we have not pledged any assets as collateral for this obligation.

Our senior unsecured note obligations consist of the following as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, sorted by maturity date (dollars in millions):

During the second quarter of 2007, Crest sold 26 properties for $56.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $5.3 million.  As part of one sale during the second quarter of 2007, Crest provided the buyer financing in the form of a $619,000 mortgage promissory note.  In comparison, during the second quarter of 2006, Crest sold one property for $3.8 million, which resulted in a gain of $520,000.  Crest’s gains on sales are reported before income taxes and are included in discontinued operations.

During the first six months of 2007, Crest sold 31 properties for $69.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $6.6 million.  As part of two sales during the first six months of 2007, Crest provided the buyers financing for a total of $3.8 million in mortgage promissory notes. In comparison, during the first six months of 2006, Crest sold five properties for $10.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.4 million.

During the second quarter of 2007, we sold two investment properties for a total of $1.0 million, which resulted in a gain of $585,000.  In comparison, during the second quarter of 2006, we sold five investment properties for a total of $4.6 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.4 million. As part of one sale during the second quarter of 2006, we provided the buyer financing in the form of a $1.3 million promissory note, which was paid in full in September 2006.  These gains are included in discontinued operations.

During the first six months of 2007, we sold three investment properties for a total of $1.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $585,000.  This gain is included in discontinued operations.  In addition, we sold excess land from three properties for a total of $3.8 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.8 million.  The gain from the land sales is reported in “other revenue” on our consolidated statements of income because this excess land was associated with properties that continue to be owned as part of our core operations.  In comparison, during the first six months of 2006, we sold ten investment properties for a total of $6.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.2 million. This gain is included in discontinued operations.

In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“SFAS 144”), Realty Income’s operations from one investment property classified as held for sale at June 30, 2007, plus properties sold in 2007 and 2006, are reported as discontinued operations.  Their respective results of operations have been reclassified to “income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment” on our consolidated statements of income.  We do not depreciate properties that are classified as held for sale.

Crest acquires properties with the intention of reselling them rather than holding them for investment and operating the properties.  Consequently, we classify properties acquired by Crest as held for sale at the date of acquisition and do not depreciate them.  In accordance with SFAS 144, the operations of Crest’s properties are classified as “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest” on our consolidated statements of income.

No debt was assumed by buyers of our investment properties or repaid as a result of our investment property sales and we do not allocate interest expense to discontinued operations related to real estate held for investment.

We allocate interest expense related to borrowings specifically attributable to Crest’s properties.  The interest expense amounts allocated to the Crest properties are included in “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest.”

The following is a summary of Crest’s “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale” (dollars in thousands):

The following is a summary of Realty Income’s “income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment” (dollars in thousands):

The following is a summary of our total discontinued operations (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

The per share amounts for “income from discontinued operations” above and the “income from continuing operations” and “net income” reported on the consolidated statement of income have each been calculated independently.

A.  Common Stock. We pay monthly distributions to our common stockholders.  The following is a summary of the monthly distributions paid per common share for the first six months of 2007 and 2006:

At June 30, 2007, a distribution of $0.12775 per common share was payable and was paid on July 16, 2007.

B.  Preferred Stock.  In December 2006, we issued 8.8 million shares of 6^_3/4% Monthly Income Class E cumulative redeemable preferred stock.  Beginning December 7, 2011, the Class E preferred shares are redeemable, at our option, for $25 per share.  During the first six months of 2007, we paid six monthly dividends to holders of our Class E preferred stock totaling $0.88125 per share, or $7.8 million, and at June 30, 2007 a monthly dividend of $0.140625 per share was payable and was paid on July 16, 2007.  In January 2007, we paid the first Class E preferred dividend of $0.178125, which was for a period of 38 days.

In May 2004, we issued 4.0 million shares of 7 ^_3/8% Monthly Income Class D cumulative redeemable preferred stock.  In October 2004, we issued an additional 1.1 million shares of Class D preferred stock.  Beginning May 27, 2009, the Class D preferred shares are redeemable, at our option, for $25 per share.  During the first six months of 2007 and 2006, we paid six monthly dividends to holders of our Class D preferred stock totaling $0.9218754 per share, or $4.7 million, and at June 30, 2007 a monthly dividend of $0.1536459 per share was payable and was paid on July 16, 2007.

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period.  Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income available to common stockholders for the period by the weighted average number of common shares that would have been outstanding assuming the issuance of common shares for all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the reporting period.

The following is a reconciliation of the denominator of basic net income per common share computation to the denominator of diluted net income per common share computation:

Interest paid during the first six months of 2007 was $28.4 million and for the first six months of 2006 was $26.1 million.

Interest capitalized to properties under development in the first six months of 2007 was $471,000 and in the first six months of 2006 was $1.1 million.

Income taxes paid by Realty Income and Crest in the first six months of 2007 totaled $2.7 million and in the first six months of 2006 totaled $569,000.

The following non-cash investing and financing activities are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements:

A.  Share-based compensation for the first six months of 2007 was $2.2 million and for the first six months of 2006 was $1.6 million.

B.  In 2007, Crest sold two properties for $5.5 million and received mortgage promissory notes totaling $3.8 million from the buyers, which are included in “other assets” on our June 30, 2007 consolidated balance sheet.

C.  On one property sale during the second quarter of 2006, we provided the buyer financing in the form of a $1.3 million promissory note, which was paid in full in September 2006.

D.  In 2004, we recorded a loss of $716,000 on one property to reduce its carrying value to zero.  This impairment was the result of a dispute with the original owner and tenant in their bankruptcy proceeding.

Our title insurance company failed to timely record the deed on this property upon our original acquisition, which resulted in a claim by the bankruptcy trustee that Realty Income did not have legal title to the property.  In the second quarter of 2006, this issue was resolved and we obtained title to the property.  At that time we reinstated the original carrying value (adjusted for depreciation) on our balance sheet and recorded other revenue of $716,000.  We also reversed accrued liabilities and property expenses of $133,000 associated with this property.  As part of the settlement, these costs became the responsibility of the title insurance company.

E.  Distributions payable on our balance sheets is comprised of the following declared distributions (dollars in thousands):

We evaluate performance and make resource allocation decisions on an industry by industry basis. For financial reporting purposes, we have grouped our tenants into 30 industry and activity segments (including properties owned by Crest that are grouped together). All of the properties are incorporated into one of the applicable segments. Because almost all of our leases require the tenant to pay operating expenses, revenue is the only component of segment profit and loss we measure.

The following tables set forth certain information regarding the properties owned by us, classified according to the business of the respective tenants as of June 30, 2007 (dollars in thousands):

In 2003, our Board of Directors adopted, and stockholders approved, the 2003 Incentive Award Plan of Realty Income Corporation (the “Stock Plan”) to enable us to attract and retain the services of directors, employees and consultants considered essential to our long-term success, by offering them an opportunity to own stock in Realty Income and/or rights that will reflect our growth, development and financial success. 

Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted FASB Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payments.  Statement No. 123R requires companies to recognize in the income statement the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation issued to employees.  Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and starting January 1, 2002 expensed costs for all stock option awards granted, modified, or settled.

The amount of share-based compensation costs charged against income during the second quarter of 2007 were $1.4 million, during the second quarter of 2006 were $1.0 million, during the first six months of 2007 were $2.2 million and during the first six months of 2006 were $1.6 million.

The following table summarizes our common stock grant activity under our Stock Plan.  Our common stock grants vest over periods ranging from immediately to 10 years.

⁽¹⁾ Grant date fair value.

During the first six months of 2007, we issued 271,231 shares of common stock under our Stock Plan. These shares vest over the following service periods: 20,000 vested upon issuance, 4,000 vest over a service period of one year, 8,000 vest over a service period of three years, 19,000 vest over a service period of five years and 220,231 vest over a service period of 10 years.

Our Stock Plan was amended on May 15, 2007. For grants made on or after May 15, 2007 the vesting schedule for shares granted to non-employee directors was amended to the following schedule:

On May 15, 2007, our Board of Directors also approved a new vesting schedule for shares granted to employees on or after May 15, 2007, which is as follows:

As of June 30, 2007, the remaining unamortized share-based compensation expense totaled $20.9 million, which is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the service period of each applicable award.

The effect of pre-vesting forfeitures on our recorded expense has historically been negligible.  Any future pre-vesting forfeitures are also expected to be negligible and we will record the benefit related to such forfeitures as they occur.  Under the terms of our Stock Plan, we pay non-refundable dividends to the holders of our nonvested shares.  Under Statement No. 123R, the dividends paid to holders of these nonvested shares should be charged as compensation expense to the extent that they relate to nonvested shares that do not or are not expected to vest.  Given the negligible historical and prospective forfeiture rate determined by us, we did not record any amount to compensation expense related to dividends paid in 2007 or 2006, nor do we expect to record any amounts in future periods.

No stock options were granted after January 1, 2002.  Prior to that time, stock options were granted with an exercise price equal to the underlying stock’s fair market value at the date of grant.  Stock options expire ten years from the date they were granted and vested over service periods of one, three, four or five years.  As of June 30, 2007, there are 52,447 vested stock options outstanding and exercisable with a weighted average exercise price of $12.96.  There were 53,921 stock options exercised in the first six months of 2007, with a weighted average exercise price of $13.16.

In the ordinary course of business, we are party to various legal actions which we believe are routine in nature and incidental to the operation of our business. We believe that the outcome of the proceedings will not have a material adverse effect upon our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

At June 30, 2007, we have committed to pay estimated unfunded development costs of $37.7 million on properties under development.  In addition, we also have contingent payments for tenant improvements and leasing costs of $397,000 as well as a $3 million commitment to fund the construction costs of one building, which is not currently under construction, and for which funding is dependent upon the tenant’s commitment to construct the building prior to September 30, 2007.

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including documents incorporated by reference, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. When used in this quarterly report, the words “estimated”, “anticipated”, “expect”, “believe”, “intend” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions about Realty Income Corporation, including, among other things:

Future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements.  In particular, some of the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are:

Additional factors that may cause risks and uncertainties include those discussed in the sections entitled “Business”, “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date that this quarterly report was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.  We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this quarterly report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In light of these risks and uncertainties, the forward-looking events discussed in this quarterly report might not occur.

Realty Income Corporation, The Monthly Dividend Company^®, is a Maryland corporation organized to operate as an equity real estate investment trust, or REIT.  Our primary business objective is to generate dependable monthly cash distributions from a consistent and predictable level of funds from operations, or FFO per share.  The monthly distributions are supported by the cash flow from our portfolio of retail properties leased to regional and national retail chains.  We have in-house acquisition, leasing, legal, retail research, real estate research, portfolio management and capital markets expertise. Over the past 38 years, Realty Income and its predecessors have been acquiring and owning freestanding retail properties that generate rental revenue under long-term lease agreements (primarily 15 to 20 years).

In addition, we seek to increase distributions to stockholders and FFO per share through both active portfolio management and the acquisition of additional properties. Our portfolio management focus includes:

In acquiring additional properties, we adhere to a focused strategy of primarily acquiring properties that are:

At June 30, 2007, we owned a diversified portfolio:

Of the 1,998 properties in the portfolio, 1,990, or 99.6%, are single-tenant, retail properties and the remaining eight are multi-tenant, distribution and office properties. At June 30, 2007, 1,964, or 98.7%, of the 1,990 single-tenant properties were leased with a weighted average remaining lease term (excluding extension options) of approximately 12.6 years.

In addition, at June 30, 2007, our wholly-owned taxable REIT subsidiary, Crest, had invested $74.5 million in 29 properties, which are classified as held for sale.  Crest was created to buy and sell properties, primarily to individual investors who are involved in tax-deferred exchanges under Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Tax Code”).

We typically acquire retail store properties under long-term leases with retail chain store operators. These transactions generally provide capital to owners of retail real estate and retail chains for expansion or other corporate purposes. Our acquisition and investment activities are concentrated in well-defined target markets and generally focus on retail chains providing goods and services that satisfy basic consumer needs.

Our net-lease agreements generally:

We believe that owning an actively managed, diversified portfolio of retail properties under long-term, net leases produces consistent and predictable income.  Net leases typically require the tenant to be responsible for minimum monthly rent and property operating expenses including property taxes, insurance and maintenance.  In addition, tenants are typically responsible for future rent increases based on increases in the consumer price index, fixed increases or, to a lesser degree, additional rent calculated as a percentage of the tenants’ gross sales above a specified level. We believe that a portfolio of properties under long-term leases, coupled with the tenant’s responsibility for property expenses, generally produces a more predictable income stream than many other types of real estate portfolios, while continuing to offer the potential for growth in rental income.

We generally provide sale-leaseback financing to less than investment grade retail chains.  We typically acquire and lease back properties to regional and national retail chains and believe that within this market we can achieve an attractive risk-adjusted return on the financing we provide to retailers.  Since 1970, our overall weighted average occupancy rate at the end of each year has been 98.6%, and the occupancy rate at the end of each year has never been below 97.5%.

We seek to invest in industries in which several, well-organized, regional and national retail chains are capturing market share through service, quality control, economies of scale, advertising and the selection of prime retail locations. We execute our acquisition strategy by acting as a source of capital to regional and national retail chain store owners and operators, doing business in a variety of industries, by acquiring and leasing back retail store locations. We undertake thorough research and analysis to identify appropriate industries, tenants and property locations for investment. Our research expertise is instrumental to uncovering net-lease opportunities in markets where our real estate financing program adds value. In selecting real estate for potential investment, we generally seek to acquire properties that have the following characteristics:

During the second quarter of 2007, Realty Income invested $37.5 million in 35 new retail properties and properties under development with a weighted average contractual lease rate of 8.8%. These 35 properties are located in four states, will contain over 208,000 leasable square feet, and are 100% leased with an average lease term of 19.4 years.  The 35 new properties acquired by Realty Income are net-leased to three different retail chains in the following three industries: convenience store, health and fitness, and restaurant.

During the first six months of 2007, Realty Income invested $98.3 million in 46 new retail properties and properties under development with a weighted average contractual lease rate of 8.6%. The 46 new properties are located in 12 states, will contain over 554,000 leasable square feet, and are 100% leased with an average lease term of 19.1 years.  The 46 new properties acquired by Realty Income are net-leased to six different retail chains in the following five industries: convenience store, grocery, health and fitness, restaurant and sporting goods.

At June 30, 2007, Realty Income had invested $25.0 million in four properties that were leased and being developed by the tenant (with development costs funded by Realty Income).  Rent on these properties is scheduled to begin at various times during the next twelve months.  At June 30, 2007, we had outstanding commitments to pay estimated unfunded development costs totaling approximately $37.7 million.

The initial weighted average contractual lease rate is computed as estimated contractual net operating income (in a net-leased property that is equal to the base rent or, in the case of the properties under development, the estimated base rent under the lease) for the first year of each lease, divided by the estimated total costs.  Since it is possible that a tenant could default on the payment of contractual rent, we cannot assure you that the actual return on the funds invested will remain at the percentages listed above.

In April 2007, Moody’s Investors Service upgraded our senior unsecured debt rating to Baa1 from Baa2 and our preferred stock rating to Baa2 from Baa3, with a stable outlook.

In the second quarter of 2007, we capitalized costs of $327,000 on existing properties in our portfolio, consisting of $111,000 for re-leasing costs and $216,000 for building improvements.

In the first six months of 2007, we capitalized costs of $1.0 million on existing properties in our portfolio, consisting of $238,000 for re-leasing costs and $794,000 for building improvements.

Net income available to common stockholders was $30.9 million in the second quarter of 2007 versus $24.3 million in the same quarter of 2006, an increase of $6.6 million. On a diluted per common share basis, net income was $0.31 per share in the second quarter of 2007 compared to $0.27 in the second quarter of 2006.

Net income available to common stockholders was $61.1 million in the first six months of 2007 versus $46.8 million in the same period of 2006, an increase of $14.3 million. On a diluted per common share basis, net income was $0.61 per share in the first six months of 2007 compared to $0.54 in the first six months of 2006.

The calculation to determine net income available to common stockholders includes the gain from the sales of properties. The amount of gains varies from period to period and can significantly impact net income available to common stockholders.

The gain recognized from the sales of investment properties during the second quarter of 2007 was $585,000, as compared to $1.4 million for the second quarter of 2006.  The gain recognized from the sales of investment properties during the first six months of 2007 was $2.4 million, as compared to $2.2 million for the first six months of 2006.

In the second quarter of 2007, our FFO increased by $11.2 million, or 29.8%, to $48.8 million versus $37.6 million in the second quarter of 2006.  On a diluted per common share basis, FFO was $0.49 in the second quarter of 2007 compared to $0.43 for the second quarter of 2006, an increase of $0.06, or 14.0%.

In the first six months of 2007, our FFO increased by $22.4 million, or 30.7%, to $95.3 million versus $72.9 million in the first six months of 2006.  On a diluted per common share basis, FFO was $0.95 in the first six months of 2007 compared to $0.85 for the first six months of 2006, an increase of $0.10, or 11.8%.

See our discussion of FFO later in this MD&A for a reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders to FFO.

During the second quarter of 2007, Crest sold 26 properties from its inventory for an aggregate of $56.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $5.3 million.  During the first six months of 2007, Crest sold 31 properties from its inventory for an aggregate of $69.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $6.6 million.  Crest’s gains are included in “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest” on our consolidated statements of income.

Crest’s property inventory at June 30, 2007 totaled $74.5 million and at December 31, 2006 totaled $137.5 million, and is included in “real estate held for sale, net” on our consolidated balance sheets.

We continue our 38-year policy of paying distributions monthly.  Monthly distributions per share were increased in April 2007 by $0.000625 to $0.127125 and in July 2007 by $0.000625 to $0.12775.  The increase in July 2007 was our 39th consecutive quarterly increase and the 44th increase in the amount of our dividend since our listing on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, in 1994. In the first six months of 2007, we paid three monthly cash distributions per share in the amount of $0.1265 and three in the amount of $0.127125, totaling $0.760875. In June 2007 and July 2007, we declared distributions of $0.12775 per share, which were paid on July 16, 2007 and will be paid on August 15, 2007, respectively.

The monthly distribution of $0.12775 per share represents a current annualized distribution of $1.533 per share, and an annualized distribution yield of approximately 6.5% based on the last reported sale price of our common stock on the NYSE of $23.59 on July 30, 2007. Although we expect to continue our policy of paying monthly distributions, we cannot guarantee that we will maintain our current level of distributions, that we will continue our pattern of increasing distributions per share, or what our actual distribution yield will be in any future period.

We are organized to operate as an equity REIT that acquires and leases properties and distributes to stockholders, in the form of monthly cash distributions, a substantial portion of our net cash flow generated from leases on our retail properties. We intend to retain an appropriate amount of cash as working capital. At June 30, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $8.9 million.

We believe that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash provided from operating activities and borrowing capacity is sufficient to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future.  We intend, however, to use additional sources of capital to fund property acquisitions and to repay our credit facility.

We have a $300 million revolving, unsecured credit facility that expires in October 2008. In April 2007, Moody’s Investors Service upgraded our credit ratings.  Effective May 1, 2007, our current investment grade credit ratings provided for financing under the credit facility at the London Interbank Offered Rate, commonly referred to as LIBOR, plus 60 basis points with a facility fee of 15 basis points, for all-in drawn pricing of 75 basis points over LIBOR.  Prior to the credit rating upgrade by Moody’s Investors Service, financing under the credit facility was five basis points higher.  At July 30, 2007, we had a borrowing capacity of $300.0 million available on our credit facility and no outstanding balance.

We expect to use the credit facility to acquire additional retail properties and for other corporate purposes.  Any additional borrowings will increase our exposure to interest rate risk.  We have the right to request an increase in the borrowing capacity of the credit facility by up to $100 million, to a total borrowing capacity of $400 million.  Any increase in the borrowing capacity is subject to approval by the lending banks on our credit facility.

We have no mortgage debt on any of our properties.

In April 2006, we filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC, which will be effective for a term of three years. In accordance with SEC rules, the amount of the securities to be issued pursuant to this shelf registration statement was not specified when it was filed.  The securities covered by this registration statement include common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, or any combination of such securities.  We may periodically offer one or more of these securities in amounts, prices and on terms to be announced when and if the securities are offered. The specifics of any future offerings, along with the use of proceeds of any securities offered, will be described in detail in a prospectus supplement, or other offering materials, at the time of any offering.  There is no specific limit to the dollar amount of new securities that can be issued under this new shelf registration before it expires in April 2009, and our common stock, preferred stock and notes issued after April 2006 were all issued pursuant to this universal shelf registration statement.

We believe that our stockholders are best served by a conservative capital structure. Therefore, we seek to maintain a conservative debt level on our balance sheet and solid interest and fixed charge coverage ratios. At July 30, 2007, our total outstanding credit facility borrowings and outstanding notes were $920.0 million or approximately 25.2% of our total market capitalization of $3.65 billion. We define our total market capitalization at July 30, 2007 as the sum of:

We are currently assigned investment grade corporate credit ratings on our senior unsecured notes from Fitch Ratings, Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Group. Currently, Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of BBB+, Moody’s has assigned a rating of Baa1 and Standard & Poor’s has assigned a rating of BBB to our senior notes. Standard & Poor’s rating has a “positive” outlook and Fitch and Moody’s have “stable” outlooks.

We have also been assigned investment grade credit ratings from the same rating agencies on our preferred stock. Fitch Ratings has assigned a rating of BBB, Moody’s has assigned a rating of Baa2 and Standard & Poor’s has assigned a rating of BBB- to our preferred stock.  Standard & Poor’s rating has a “positive” outlook and Fitch and Moody’s have “stable” outlooks.

The credit ratings assigned to us could change based upon, among other things, our results of operations and financial condition.  These ratings are subject to ongoing evaluation by credit rating agencies and we cannot assure you that any such rating will not be changed or withdrawn by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment, circumstances warrant.  Moreover, a rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold our debt securities, preferred stock or common stock.

Our senior unsecured note obligations consist of the following as of June 30, 2007, sorted by maturity date (dollars in millions):

Interest on all of our senior note obligations is paid semiannually, with the exception of the interest on the 8 ^_1/4% senior notes issued in October 1998, which is paid monthly.  All of these notes contain various covenants, including: (i) a limitation on incurrence of any debt which would cause our debt to total adjusted assets ratio to exceed 60%; (ii) a limitation on incurrence of any secured debt which would cause our secured debt to total adjusted assets ratio to exceed 40%; (iii) a limitation on incurrence of any debt which would cause our debt service coverage ratio to be less than 1.5 times; and (iv) the maintenance at all times of total unencumbered assets not less than 150% of our outstanding unsecured debt. We have been in compliance with these covenants since each of the notes were issued.

The following is a summary of the key financial covenants of our senior unsecured notes, as defined and calculated per the terms of our notes.  These calculations, which are not based on GAAP measurements, are presented to investors to show our ability to incur additional debt under the terms of our notes only and are not measures of our liquidity or performance.  The actual amounts as of June 30, 2007 are:

All of our outstanding notes and bonds have fixed interest rates.  Our credit facility interest rate is variable.

The following table summarizes the maturity of each of our obligations as of June 30, 2007 (dollars in millions):

Our credit facility and note obligations are unsecured.  Accordingly, we have not pledged any assets as collateral for these obligations.

We have no unconsolidated or off-balance sheet investments in “variable interest entities” or off-balance sheet financing, nor do we engage in trading activities involving energy or commodity contracts or other derivative instruments.

As we have no joint ventures, off-balance sheet entities, or mandatory redeemable preferred stock, our financial position or results of operations are currently not affected by Financial Accounting Standard Board Interpretation No. 46R,Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities and Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity.

Distributions are paid monthly to our common, Class D preferred and Class E preferred stockholders if, and when, declared by our Board of Directors.

In order to maintain our tax status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we generally are required to distribute dividends to our stockholders aggregating annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and by excluding net capital gains), and we are subject to income tax to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income (including net capital gains). In 2006, our cash distributions totaled $139.1 million, or approximately 114.2% of our estimated REIT taxable income of $121.8 million. Our estimated REIT taxable income reflects non-cash deductions for depreciation and amortization.

We intend to continue to make distributions to our stockholders that are sufficient to meet this distribution requirement and that will reduce our exposure to income taxes. Our cash distributions for the first six months of 2007 totaled $76.9 million, representing 80.7% of our funds from operations available to common stockholders of $95.3 million.  In comparison, our 2006 cash distributions to common stockholders totaled $129.7 million, representing 83.2% of our funds from operations available to common stockholders of $155.8 million.

The Class D preferred stockholders receive cumulative distributions at a rate of 7.375% per annum on the $25 per share liquidation preference (equivalent to $1.84375 per annum per share).  The Class E preferred stockholders receive cumulative distributions at a rate of 6.75% per annum on the $25 per share liquidation preference (equivalent to $1.6875 per annum per share).

Future distributions will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, FFO, cash flow from operations, financial condition and capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Tax Code, our debt service requirements and any other factors the Board of Directors may deem relevant. In addition, our credit facility contains financial covenants that could limit the amount of distributions payable by us in the event of a deterioration in our results of operations or financial condition, and which prohibit the payment of distributions on the common or preferred stock in the event that we fail to pay when due (subject to any applicable grace period) any principal or interest on borrowings under our credit facility.

Distributions of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for federal income tax purposes generally will be taxable to stockholders as ordinary income, except to the extent that we recognize capital gains and declare a capital gains dividend or that such amounts constitute "qualified dividend income" subject to a reduced rate of tax. The maximum tax rate of non-corporate taxpayers for “qualified dividend

income” has generally been reduced to 15% (for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002). In general, dividends payable by REITs are not eligible for the reduced tax rate on corporate dividends, except to the extent the REIT’s dividends are attributable to dividends received from taxable corporations (such as our taxable REIT subsidiary, Crest), to income that was subject to tax at the corporate or REIT level (for example, if we distribute taxable income that we retained and paid tax on in the prior taxable year) or, as discussed above, dividends properly designated by us as “capital gain dividends.” Distributions in excess of earnings and profits generally will be treated as a non-taxable reduction in the stockholders’ basis in the stock. Distributions above that basis, generally, will be taxable as a capital gain. Approximately 9.9% of the distributions to our common stockholders, made or deemed to have been made in 2006, were classified as a return of capital for federal income tax purposes. We are unable to predict the portion of future distributions that may be classified as a return of capital.

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Our consolidated financial statements are the basis for our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. Preparing our consolidated financial statements requires us to make a number of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. We believe that we have made these estimates and assumptions in an appropriate manner in a way that accurately reflects our financial condition. We continually test and evaluate these estimates and assumptions using our historical knowledge of the business, as well as other factors, to ensure that they are reasonable for reporting purposes. However, actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions.

In order to prepare our consolidated financial statements according to the rules and guidelines set forth by GAAP, many subjective judgments must be made with regard to critical accounting polices. One of these judgments is our estimate for useful lives in determining depreciation expense for our properties. Depreciation of buildings and improvements is computed using the straight–line method over an estimated useful life of 25 years. If we use a shorter or longer estimated useful life it could have a material impact on our results of operations. We believe that 25 years is an appropriate estimate of useful life. No depreciation has been recorded on Crest’s properties because they are held for sale.

Another significant judgment must be made as to if, and when, impairment losses should be taken on our properties when events or change in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Generally, a provision is made for impairment loss if estimated future operating cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) plus estimated disposition proceeds (undiscounted) are less than the current book value. Impairment losses are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. If a property is held for sale, it is carried at the lower of carrying cost or estimated fair value, less cost to sell. The carrying value of our real estate is the largest component of our consolidated balance sheet. If events should occur that require us to reduce the carrying value of our real estate by recording provisions for impairment losses, it could have a material impact on our results of operations.

Rental revenue was $70.5 million for the second quarter of 2007 versus $55.7 million for the second quarter of 2006, an increase of $14.8 million, or 26.6%.  The increase in rental revenue in the second quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2006 is attributable to:

Rental revenue was $139.6 million for the first six months of 2007 versus $110.7 million for the first six months of 2006, an increase of $28.9 million, or 26.1%.  The increase in rental revenue in the first six months of 2007 compared to the first six months of 2006 is attributable to:

Of the 1,998 properties in the portfolio at June 30, 2007, 1,990, or 99.6%, are single-tenant properties and the remaining eight are multi-tenant properties. Of the 1,990 single-tenant properties, 1,964, or 98.7%, were net leased with a weighted average remaining lease term (excluding rights to extend a lease at the option of the tenant) of approximately 12.6 years at June 30, 2007. Of our 1,964 leased single-tenant properties, 1,750, or 89.1%, were under leases that provide for increases in rents through:

Percentage rent, which is included in rental revenue, was $167,000 in the second quarter of 2007 and $93,000 in the second quarter of 2006. Percentage rent was $329,000 in the first six months of 2007 and $208,000 in the first six months of 2006. Percentage rent in the second quarter and first six months of 2007 was less than 1% of rental revenue and we anticipate percentage rent to be less than 1% of rental revenue in 2007.

Our portfolio of retail real estate, leased primarily to regional and national chains under net leases, continues to perform well and provides dependable lease revenue supporting the payment of monthly dividends to our stockholders.  At June 30, 2007, our portfolio of 1,998 retail properties was 98.6% leased with 27 properties available for lease, one of which is a multi-tenant property.

As of July 26, 2007, transactions to lease or sell 12 of the 27 properties available for lease at June 30, 2007 were underway or completed. We anticipate these transactions will be completed during the next several months, although we cannot guarantee that all of these properties can be leased or sold within this period. It has been our experience that approximately 1% to 3% of our property portfolio will be unleased at any given time; however, we cannot assure you that the number of properties available for lease will not exceed these levels.

For the second quarter of 2007, depreciation and amortization was $18.5 million as compared to $14.8 million in the second quarter of 2006. For the first six months of 2007, depreciation and amortization was $36.6 million as compared to $28.3 million in the first six months of 2006.  The increase in depreciation and amortization in 2007 was due to the acquisition of properties in 2007 and 2006, which was partially offset by property sales in these years.

Interest expense was $1.1 million higher in the second quarter of 2007 than in the second quarter of 2006.  Interest expense was $322,000 higher in the first six months of 2007 than in the first six months of 2006. Interest expense increased in 2007 primarily due to higher average outstanding balances, which were partially offset by lower interest rates related to our average outstanding borrowings and Crest’s larger investment in real estate, which contributed to the increase in interest expense included in discontinued operations.  We issued $275 million of 10-year notes in September 2006, which contributed to the increase in average outstanding balances and slightly lower average interest rates on our debt.

The following is a summary of the components of our interest expense (dollars in thousands):

At July 30, 2007, the weighted average interest rate on our notes payable of $920 million was 5.99% and the average interest rate on our credit line was 5.92%.  There was no balance on our credit line at July 30, 2007.

Our interest coverage ratio for the second quarter of 2007 was 4.8 times, and was 4.1 times for the second quarter of 2006. Our interest coverage ratio for the first six months of 2007 was 4.7 times, and was 3.9 times for the first six months of 2006.  Interest coverage ratio is calculated as: the interest coverage amount (as calculated in the following table) divided by interest expense, including interest recorded to discontinued operations. We consider interest coverage ratio to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a company’s ability to meet its interest expense obligations. Our calculation of interest coverage ratio may be different from the calculation used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited. This information should not be considered as an alternative to any GAAP liquidity measures.

The following is a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities on our consolidated statements of cash flow to our interest coverage amount (dollars in thousands):

Our fixed charge coverage ratio for the second quarter of 2007 was 3.4 times, and was 3.5 times for the second quarter of 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, our fixed charge coverage ratio was 3.4 times, and was 3.3 times for the six months ended June 30, 2006. Fixed charge coverage ratio is calculated in exactly the same manner as interest coverage ratio, except that preferred stock dividends are also added to the denominator. We consider fixed charge coverage ratio to be an appropriate supplemental measure of a company’s ability to make its interest and preferred stock dividend payments. Our calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio may be different from the calculation used by other companies and, therefore, comparability may be limited. This information should not be considered as an alternative to any GAAP liquidity measures.

Interest coverage amount divided by interest expense plus preferred stock dividends (dollars in thousands):

General and administrative expenses increased by $1.4 million to $5.8 million in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to $4.4 million in the second quarter of 2006.  In the second quarter of 2007, as a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expenses increased to 8.3% as compared to 7.7% in the second quarter of 2006.

General and administrative expenses increased by $2.3 million to $10.9 million in the first six months of 2007 as compared to $8.6 million in the first six months of 2006.  As a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expenses remained at 7.7% for the first six months of 2007 and 2006.  General and administrative expenses increased in 2007 primarily due to increases in employee and director compensation costs.

As our property portfolio has grown and continues to grow, we have increased, and anticipate that we will continue to gradually increase the level of our staffing. We expect general and administrative expenses to continue to increase due to costs attributable to compensation costs.

In July 2007, we had 75 permanent employees as compared to July 2006 when we had 71 permanent employees.

Property expenses are broken down into costs associated with non-net leased multi-tenant properties, unleased single-tenant properties and general portfolio expenses. Expenses related to the multi-tenant and unleased single-tenant properties include, but are not limited to, property taxes, maintenance, insurance, utilities, property inspections, bad debt expense and legal fees. General portfolio costs include, but are not limited to, insurance, legal, bad debt expense, property inspections and title search fees. At June 30, 2007, 27 properties were available for lease as compared to 26 at December 31, 2006 and 22 at June 30, 2006.

Property expenses were $964,000 in the second quarter of 2007 and $685,000 in the second quarter of 2006.  Property expenses were $1.8 million in the first six months of 2007 and $1.5 million in the first six months of 2006.  The increase in property expenses in 2007 is primarily attributable to an increase in costs associated with bad debt expense and legal fees.

Income taxes were $353,000 in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to $231,000 in the second quarter of 2006.  Income taxes were $598,000 for the first six months of 2007 as compared to $462,000 for the first six months of 2006. These amounts are for city and state income taxes paid by Realty Income.  The increase in 2007 is due primarily to an increase in rental revenue resulting in higher city and state income tax expense.

In addition, Crest incurred state and federal income taxes of $1.5 million in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to $165,000 in the second quarter of 2006.  Crest incurred state and federal income taxes of $1.6 million in the first six months of 2007 as compared to $454,000 in the first six months of 2006. The increase in Crest’s income taxes is due to higher taxable income, primarily attributable to higher rental revenue and higher gain on sales of real estate acquired for resale.  These amounts are included in “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest” on our consolidated statements of income.

Crest acquires properties with the intention of reselling them rather than holding them as investments and operating the properties.  Consequently, we classify properties acquired by Crest as held for sale at the date of acquisition and do not depreciate them.  The operation of Crest’s properties is classified as “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale by Crest.”

The following is a summary of Crest’s “income from discontinued operations, real estate acquired for resale” on our consolidated statements of income (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

Realty Income’s operations from one property listed as held for sale at June 30, 2007, plus properties sold in 2007 and 2006 have been classified as discontinued operations.  The following is a summary of Realty Income’s “income from discontinued operations, real estate held for investment” on our consolidated statements of income (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

The following is a summary of our total discontinued operations (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

The above per share amounts have each been calculated independently.

During the second quarter of 2007, Crest sold 26 properties for $56.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $5.3 million.  As part of one sale during the second quarter of 2007, Crest provided the buyer financing in the form of a $619,000 mortgage promissory note.  In comparison, during the second quarter of 2006, Crest sold one property for $3.8 million, which resulted in a gain of $520,000.  Crest’s gains on sales are reported before income taxes and are included in discontinued operations.

During the first six months of 2007, Crest sold 31 properties for $69.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $6.6 million.  As part of two sales during the first six months of 2007, Crest provided the buyers financing for a total of $3.8 million in mortgage promissory notes.  In comparison, during the first six months of 2006, Crest sold five properties for $10.2 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.4 million.

At June 30, 2007, Crest had $74.5 million invested in 29 properties, which are held for sale. Crest generally carries a real estate inventory in excess of $20 million.  Crest generates an earnings spread on the difference between the lease payments it receives on the properties held in inventory and the cost of capital used to acquire properties.  It is our belief that at this level of inventory, rental revenue will exceed the ongoing operating expenses of Crest without any property sales.

During the second quarter of 2007, we sold two investment properties for $1.0 million, which resulted in a gain of $585,000.  In comparison, during the second quarter of 2006, we sold five investment properties for $4.6 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.4 million.  As part of one sale during the second quarter of 2006, we provided the buyer financing in the form of a $1.3 million promissory note, which was paid in full in September 2006.  These gains are included in discontinued operations.

During the first six months of 2007, we sold three investment properties for $1.5 million, which resulted in a gain of $585,000.  This gain is included in discontinued operations.  In addition, we sold excess land from three properties for $3.8 million, which resulted in a gain of $1.8 million.  The gain from the land sales is reported in “other revenue” on our consolidated statements of income because this excess land was associated with properties that continue to be owned as part of our core operations.  In comparison, during the first six months of 2006, we sold ten investment properties for $6.7 million, which resulted in a gain of $2.2 million.  This gain is included in discontinued operations.

We have an active portfolio management program that incorporates the sale of assets when we believe the reinvestment of the sale proceeds will generate higher returns, enhance the credit quality of our real estate portfolio or extend our average remaining lease term. At June 30, 2007, we classified real estate with a carrying amount of $74.8 million as held for sale on our balance sheet, which includes properties owned by Crest.  Additionally, we anticipate selling investment properties from our portfolio that have not yet been specifically identified, from which we anticipate receiving between $10 million and $35 million in proceeds during the next 12 months. We intend to invest these proceeds into new property acquisitions. However, we cannot guarantee that we will sell properties during the next 12 months.

Preferred stock cash dividends totaled $6.1 million in the second quarter of 2007 as compared to $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2006.  Preferred stock cash dividends totaled $12.1 million in the first six months of 2007 as compared to $4.7 million in the first six months of 2006.

Net income available to common stockholders was $30.9 million in the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $6.6 million as compared to $24.3 million in the second quarter of 2006.  Net income available to common stockholders was $61.1 million in the first six months of 2007, an increase of $14.3 million as compared to $46.8 million in the first six months of 2006.

The calculation to determine net income available to common stockholders includes gains from the sales of properties. The amount of gains varies from period to period based on the timing of property sales and can significantly impact net income available to common stockholders.

During the second quarter of 2007, the gain recognized from the sales of investment properties was $585,000 as compared to $1.4 million for the second quarter of 2006.  During the first six months of 2007, the gain recognized from the sales of investment properties was $2.4 million as compared to $2.2 million for the first six months of 2006.

FFO for the second quarter of 2007 increased by $11.2 million, or 29.8%, to $48.8 million as compared to $37.6 million in the second quarter of 2006.  FFO for the first six months of 2007 increased by $22.4 million, or 30.7%, to $95.3 million as compared to $72.9 million in the first six months of 2006.  The following is a reconciliation of net income available to common stockholders (which we believe is the most comparable GAAP measure) to FFO.  Also presented is information regarding distributions paid to common stockholders and the weighted average number of common shares used for the basic and diluted computation per share (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):