Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
or
o
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Commission File Number: 0-24649
REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Kentucky
61-0862051
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
601 West Market Street, Louisville, Kentucky
40202
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(502) 584-3600
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, as of July 31, 2014, was 18,548,340 and 2,245,492, respectively.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
3
Item 1.
Financial Statements.
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
58
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
101
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
102
Item 6.
Exhibits.
103
SIGNATURES
104
2
Item 1. Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (in thousands) (unaudited)
June 30,
December 31,
2014
2013
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$
84,273
170,863
Securities available for sale
463,646
432,893
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $48,594 in 2014 and $50,768 in 2013)
48,338
50,644
Mortgage loans held for sale, at fair value
6,809
3,506
Loans
2,725,017
2,589,792
Allowance for loan losses
(22,772
)
(23,026
Loans, net
2,702,245
2,566,766
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
28,208
28,342
Premises and equipment, net
32,481
32,908
Goodwill
10,168
Other real estate owned
11,613
17,102
Bank owned life insurance
50,656
25,086
Other assets and accrued interest receivable
26,887
33,626
TOTAL ASSETS
3,465,324
3,371,904
LIABILITIES
Deposits:
Non interest-bearing
519,651
488,642
Interest-bearing
1,485,332
1,502,215
Total deposits
2,004,983
1,990,857
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings
197,439
165,555
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
640,000
605,000
Subordinated note
41,240
Other liabilities and accrued interest payable
26,371
26,459
Total liabilities
2,910,033
2,829,111
Commitments and contingent liabilities (Footnote 9)
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, no par value
4,893
4,894
Additional paid in capital
133,320
133,012
Retained earnings
412,338
401,766
Accumulated other comprehensive income
4,740
3,121
Total stockholders equity
555,291
542,793
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
See accompanying footnotes to consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
INTEREST INCOME:
Loans, including fees
30,110
31,735
60,272
63,649
Taxable investment securities
1,908
1,976
3,767
4,016
Federal Home Loan Bank stock and other
387
408
863
855
Total interest income
32,405
34,119
64,902
68,520
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Deposits
937
975
1,915
2,030
22
13
44
42
3,267
3,735
6,831
7,293
629
1,258
Total interest expense
4,855
5,352
10,048
10,623
NET INTEREST INCOME
27,550
28,767
54,854
57,897
Provision for loan losses
693
905
(10
280
NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
26,857
27,862
54,864
57,617
NON-INTEREST INCOME:
Service charges on deposit accounts
3,563
3,498
6,858
6,708
Net refund transfer fees
1,836
1,683
16,224
13,697
Mortgage banking income
812
2,180
1,298
5,454
Debit card interchange fee income
1,738
1,656
3,673
3,467
Bargain purchase gain - First Commercial Bank
1,324
Net gain on sale of other real estate owned
264
1,034
666
1,311
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
379
570
Other
920
732
1,347
Total non-interest income
9,512
10,783
30,972
33,308
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES:
Salaries and employee benefits
13,965
15,086
28,448
31,200
Occupancy and equipment, net
5,508
5,315
11,330
10,892
Communication and transportation
856
991
1,882
2,021
Marketing and development
983
880
1,575
1,782
FDIC insurance expense
414
402
815
Bank franchise tax expense
831
857
3,170
2,572
Data processing
913
792
1,754
1,508
Debit card interchange expense
807
718
1,761
1,561
Supplies
60
218
500
572
Other real estate owned expense
560
945
1,630
1,834
Legal expense
88
1,338
1,768
1,730
2,157
4,126
4,476
Total non-interest expenses
26,715
29,699
57,659
61,001
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE
9,654
8,946
28,177
29,924
INCOME TAX EXPENSE
3,332
2,827
9,871
10,449
NET INCOME
6,322
6,119
18,306
19,475
BASIC EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
Class A Common Stock
0.31
0.30
0.88
0.94
Class B Common Stock
0.29
0.28
0.85
0.91
DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE:
0.90
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER COMMON SHARE:
0.187
0.176
0.363
0.341
0.170
0.160
0.330
0.310
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
(in thousands)
Net income
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
Change in fair value of derivatives used for cash flow hedges
(265
(505
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale
2,626
(2,566
2,628
(2,965
Change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings
315
238
369
422
Net unrealized gains (losses)
2,676
(2,328
2,492
(2,543
Tax effect
(937
(873
891
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
1,739
(1,513
1,619
(1,652
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
8,061
4,606
19,925
17,823
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014
Common Stock
Accumulated
Class A
Class B
Additional
Total
Shares
Paid In
Retained
Comprehensive
Stockholders
Outstanding
Amount
Capital
Earnings
Income
Equity
Balance, January 1, 2014
18,541
2,260
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income
Dividend declared Common Stock:
Class A shares ($0.363 per share)
(6,727
Class B shares ($0.330 per share)
(744
Stock options exercised, net of shares redeemed
7
129
(14
117
Repurchase of Class A Common Stock
(15
(3
(95
(249
(347
Conversion of Class B Common Stock to Class A Common Stock
15
Net change in notes receivable on Class A Common Stock
(85
Deferred director compensation expense - Class A Common Stock
91
Stock based compensation - restricted stock
(2
255
Stock based compensation expense - options
Balance, June 30, 2014
18,548
2,245
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013 (in thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment
3,386
2,715
Amortization (accretion) on investment securitites, net
330
337
Amortization (accretion) on loans, net
(4,494
(4,989
Net gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale
(1,166
(5,408
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale
(33,284
(208,094
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale
31,147
199,942
Net realized recovery of mortgage servicing rights
(312
(666
(1,311
Writedowns of other real estate owned
1,217
884
Deferred director compensation expense - Company Stock
89
Stock based compensation expense
268
274
Bargain purchase gain on acquisition
(1,324
(570
Net change in other assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable
189
604
Accrued interest payable
(198
11
Other assets
5,887
(2,123
Other liabilities
(1,549
723
Net cash provided by operating activities
18,884
1,773
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of securities available for sale
(109,549
(78,205
Purchases of securities to be held to maturity
(15,000
Proceeds from calls, maturities and paydowns of securities available for sale
81,567
93,401
Proceeds from calls, maturities and paydowns of securities to be held to maturity
2,269
5,806
Proceeds from sales of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
134
35
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
8,136
15,055
Net change in other loans
(25,008
(5,520
Net change in outstanding warehouse lines of credit
(94,555
38,886
Purchase of loans, including premiums paid
(14,695
Purchase of bank owned life insurance
(25,000
Net purchases of premises and equipment
(2,297
(667
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(178,998
53,791
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net change in deposits
14,126
(11,881
Net change in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings
31,884
(122,352
Payments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(83,000
(556
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
118,000
50,000
Repurchase of Common Stock
(4,095
Net proceeds from Common Stock options exercised
111
Cash dividends paid
(7,256
(6,792
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
73,524
(95,565
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(86,590
(40,001
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
137,691
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
97,690
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest
10,246
10,612
Income taxes
7,304
20,100
SUPPLEMENTAL NONCASH DISCLOSURES:
Transfers from loans to real estate acquired in settlement of loans
4,492
4,242
Loans provided for sales of other real estate owned
1,294
569
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2014 AND 2013 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2013
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Republic Bancorp, Inc. (the Parent Company) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Republic Bank & Trust Company (RB&T or the Bank). The Bank is a Kentucky-based, state chartered non-member financial institution. Republic Bancorp Capital Trust (RBCT) is a Delaware statutory business trust that is a wholly-owned unconsolidated finance subsidiary of Republic Bancorp, Inc. All companies are collectively referred to as Republic or the Company. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
On May 9, 2014, Republic Bank, the Companys wholly-owned, federally chartered savings institution, merged into RB&T. The merged institution operates under the name Republic Bank & Trust Company. The merger did not materially impact the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent to June 30, 2014, the Company formed Republic Insurance Services, Inc. (the Captive). The Captive is a wholly-owned insurance subsidiary of the Company that will provide property and casualty insurance coverage to the Company and the Bank and reinsurance to five other third party insurance captives for which insurance may not be currently available or economically feasible in todays insurance marketplace.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Republics Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
As of June 30, 2014, the Company was divided into three distinct business operating segments: Traditional Banking, Mortgage Banking and Republic Processing Group (RPG). Tax Refund Solutions (TRS), Republic Payment Solutions (RPS) and Republic Credit Solutions (RCS) operate as divisions of the RPG segment. The RPS and RCS divisions are considered immaterial for separate and independent segment reporting.
8
Traditional Banking and Mortgage Banking (collectively Core Banking)
As of June 30, 2014, in addition to an Internet delivery channel, Republic had 42 full-service banking centers with locations as follows:
· Kentucky 33
· Metropolitan Louisville 20
· Central Kentucky 8
· Elizabethtown 1
· Frankfort 1
· Georgetown 1
· Lexington 4
· Shelbyville 1
· Western Kentucky 2
· Owensboro 2
· Northern Kentucky 3
· Covington 1
· Florence 1
· Independence 1
· Southern Indiana 3
· Floyds Knobs 1
· Jeffersonville 1
· New Albany 1
· Metropolitan Tampa, Florida 3
· Metropolitan Cincinnati, Ohio 1
· Metropolitan Nashville, Tennessee 2
Republics headquarters are located in Louisville, which is the largest city in Kentucky based on population.
Core Banking results of operations are primarily dependent upon net interest income, which represents the difference between the interest income and fees on interest-earning assets and the interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities. Principal interest-earning Core Banking assets represent investment securities and commercial and consumer loans primarily secured by real estate and/or personal property. Interest-bearing liabilities primarily consist of interest-bearing deposit accounts, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, as well as short-term and long-term borrowing sources. FHLB advances have traditionally been a significant borrowing source for the Bank.
The Bank provides short-term, revolving credit facilities to mortgage bankers across the Nation through mortgage warehouse lines of credit. These credit facilities are secured by single family, first lien residential real estate loans.
The Bank began acquiring single family mortgage loans for investment through its Correspondent Lending division in May 2014. Correspondent lending generally involves the Bank acquiring closed loans that meet the Banks specifications from its Mortgage Warehouse clients. Substantially all loans purchased through the Correspondent Lending channel are purchased at a premium. Premiums on loans held for investment acquired though the Correspondent Lending division are amortized into income on the level-yield method over the expected life of the loan.
Other sources of Core Banking income include service charges on deposit accounts, debit and credit card interchange fee income, title insurance commissions, fees charged to customers for trust services and revenue generated from Mortgage Banking activities. Mortgage Banking activities represent both the origination and sale of loans in the secondary market and the servicing of loans for others, primarily the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac or FHLMC).
Core Banking operating expenses consist primarily of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment expenses, communication and transportation costs, data processing, debit card interchange expenses, marketing and development expenses, FDIC insurance expense, and various general and administrative costs. Core Banking results of operations are significantly impacted by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in market interest rates, government laws and policies and actions of regulatory agencies.
9
Republic Processing Group
All divisions of the RPG segment operate through the Bank. Nationally, RPG facilitates the receipt and payment of federal and state tax refunds under the TRS division, primarily through refund transfers (RTs). RTs are products whereby a tax refund is issued to the taxpayer after the Bank has received the refund from the federal or state government. There is no credit risk or borrowing cost associated with these products, because they are only delivered to the taxpayer upon receipt of the tax refund directly from the governmental paying authority. Fees earned on RTs, net of rebates, are the primary source of revenue for the TRS division and the RPG segment, and are reported as non-interest income under the line item Net refund transfer fees.
The TRS division historically originated and obtained a significant source of revenue from Refund Anticipation Loans (RALs), but terminated this product effective April 30, 2012. RALs were short-term consumer loans offered to taxpayers that were secured by the customers anticipated tax refund, which represented the sole source of repayment. While RALs were terminated in 2012, TRS has received and expects to continue receiving recoveries from previously charged-off RALs.
The RPS division is an issuing bank offering general purpose reloadable prepaid debit cards through third party program managers. The RCS division is piloting short-term consumer credit products.
Reclassifications and recasts Certain amounts presented in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on prior years net income.
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-08 Presentation of Financial Statements and Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 205 and Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.
The amendments in this ASU change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations for all public and nonpublic entities. A discontinued operation may include a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity, or a business or nonprofit activity. A disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entitys operations and financial results. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2015 and are not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
ASU 2014-11 Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings and Disclosures.
The amendments in this ASU require that repurchase-to-maturity transactions be accounted for as secured borrowings consistent with the accounting for other repurchase agreements. In addition, the amendments require separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty (a repurchase financing), which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement. The amendments require an entity to disclose information about transfers accounted for as sales in transactions that are economically similar to repurchase agreements, in which the transferor retains substantially all of the exposure to the economic return on the transferred financial asset throughout the term of the transaction. In addition the amendments require disclosure of the types of collateral pledged in repurchase agreements, securities lending transactions, and repurchase-to-maturity transactions and the tenor of those transactions. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2015 and are not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
ASU 2014-12 Compensation Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That Performance Targets Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period.
The amendments in this ASU are intended to resolve the diverse accounting treatment of share-based awards that require a specific performance target. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2015 and are not expected to have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
10
2. INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Securities Available for Sale:
The gross amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale and the related gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Fair
June 30, 2014 (in thousands)
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. Government agencies
144,821
640
(17
145,444
Private label mortgage backed security
4,347
1,114
5,461
Mortgage backed securities - residential
131,702
4,803
(87
136,418
Collateralized mortgage obligations
159,137
1,308
(912
159,533
Freddie Mac preferred stock
Mutual fund
1,000
1,011
Corporate bonds
15,013
52
(4
15,061
Total securities available for sale
456,020
8,646
(1,020
December 31, 2013 (in thousands)
97,157
409
(101
97,465
745
5,485
146,087
4,288
(288
150,087
164,264
1,228
(1,546
163,946
(5
995
15,015
50
(150
14,915
428,263
6,720
(2,090
Securities Held to Maturity:
The carrying value, gross unrecognized gains and losses, and fair value of securities held to maturity were as follows:
Carrying
Unrecognized
2,275
(8
2,272
412
53
465
40,651
(52
40,986
5,000
(129
4,871
Total securities held to maturity
445
(189
48,594
2,311
(13
2,305
420
43
463
42,913
(184
43,116
(116
4,884
437
(313
50,768
At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in an amount greater than 10% of stockholders equity.
Sales of Securities Available for Sale
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, there were no sales or calls of securities available for sale or applicable tax provisions for such transactions.
Investment Securities by Contractual Maturity
The amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities portfolio by contractual maturity at June 30, 2014 follows. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if securities issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date are detailed separately.
Securities
available for sale
held to maturity
Due in one year or less
23,493
23,715
502
Due from one year to five years
126,341
126,794
1,775
1,771
Due from five years to ten years
10,000
9,996
4,870
Due beyond ten years
Total securities
Freddie Mac Preferred Stock
During 2008, the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve Board, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced that the FHFA was placing Freddie Mac under conservatorship and giving management control to the FHFA. The Bank contemporaneously determined that its 40,000 shares of Freddie Mac preferred stock were fully impaired and recorded an Other Than Temporary Impairment (OTTI) charge of $2.1 million for the shares. The OTTI charge brought the carrying value of the stock down to $0. During the second quarter of 2014, based on the active trading volume and price of Freddie Mac preferred stock, the Company determined it appropriate to record an unrealized gain to other comprehensive income (OCI) related to its Freddie Mac preferred stock holdings. Based on the stocks market closing price as of June 30, 2014, the Companys unrealized gain for its Freddie Mac preferred stock totaled $718,000.
Corporate Bonds
During 2013, the Bank purchased $20 million in floating rate corporate bonds with an initial weighted average yield of 1.36%. The bonds, which have a weighted average life of seven years, were rated investment grade by accredited rating agencies as of their respective purchase dates. The total fair value of the Banks corporate bonds represented 4% of the Banks investment portfolio as of both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Mortgage Backed Securities
At June 30, 2014, with the exception of the $5.5 million private label mortgage backed security, all other mortgage backed securities held by the Bank were issued by U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies, primarily Freddie Mac and the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae or FNMA), institutions that the government has affirmed its commitment to support. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were gross unrealized/unrecognized losses of $999,000 and $1.8 million related to available for sale mortgage backed securities. Because the decline in fair value of these mortgage backed securities is attributable to changes in interest rates and illiquidity, and not credit quality, and because the Bank does not have the intent to sell these mortgage backed securities, and it is likely that it will not be required to sell the
12
securities before their anticipated recovery, management does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
Market Loss Analysis
Securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows:
Less than 12 months
12 months or more
Fair Value
Unrealized Losses
Securities available for sale:
2,106
8,312
56,578
(778
7,567
(134
64,145
76,992
(886
84,559
Securities held to maturity:
521
18,274
23,666
44,041
19,494
55,927
9,850
130,307
18,686
24,091
At June 30, 2014, the Banks security portfolio consisted of 162 securities, 19 of which were in an unrealized loss position. At December 31, 2013, the Banks security portfolio consisted of 162 securities, 27 of which were in an unrealized loss position.
Other-than-temporary Impairment
Unrealized losses for all investment securities are reviewed to determine whether the losses are other-than-temporary. Investment securities are evaluated for OTTI on at least a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation to determine whether a decline in value below amortized cost is other-than-temporary. In conducting this assessment, the Bank evaluates a number of factors including, but not limited to:
· The length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis;
· The Banks intent to hold until maturity or sell the debt security prior to maturity;
· An analysis of whether it is more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery;
· Adverse conditions specifically related to the security, an industry, or a geographic area;
· The historical and implied volatility of the fair value of the security;
· The payment structure of the security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments;
· Failure of the issuer to make scheduled interest or principal payments;
· Any rating change by a rating agency; and
· Recoveries or additional decline in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date.
The term other-than-temporary is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates that the prospects for a near-term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a general lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of the security is reduced and a corresponding charge to earnings is recognized for the anticipated credit losses.
The Bank owns one private label mortgage backed security with a total carrying value of $5.5 million at June 30, 2014. This security, with an average remaining life currently estimated at four years, is mostly backed by Alternative A first lien mortgage loans, but also has an insurance wrap or guarantee as an added layer of protection to the security holder. This asset is illiquid, and as such, the Bank determined it to be a Level 3 security in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. Based on this determination, the Bank utilized an income valuation model (present value model) approach, in determining the fair value of the security. This approach is beneficial for positions that are not traded in active markets or are subject to transfer restrictions, and/or where valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability. Such adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence, managements best estimate is used. Managements best estimate consists of both internal and external support for this investment.
See additional discussion regarding the Banks private label mortgage backed security under Footnote 6 Fair Value in this section of the filing.
Pledged Investment Securities
Investment securities pledged to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and securities held for other purposes, as required or permitted by law are as follows:
June 30, 2014
December 31, 2013
Carrying amount
249,532
224,693
Fair value
249,659
224,989
14
3. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
The Banks financing receivables consist primarily of loans and a minimal amount of lease financing receivables (together referred to as loans). Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at the principal balance outstanding, net of purchase premiums or discounts, deferred loan fees and costs and the allowance for loan losses. Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized in interest income using the level-yield method without anticipating prepayments.
Lease financing receivables, all of which are direct financing leases, are reported at their principal balance outstanding net of any unearned income, deferred fees and costs and applicable allowance for losses. Leasing income is recognized on a basis that achieves a constant periodic rate of return on the outstanding lease financing balances over the lease terms.
The composition of loans follows:
Residential real estate:
Owner occupied - bank originated
1,127,519
1,097,795
Owner occupied - correspondent*
11,785
Non owner occupied - bank originated
98,644
110,809
Commercial real estate
758,676
773,173
Commercial real estate - purchased whole loans
34,534
34,186
Construction & land development
41,109
44,351
Commercial & industrial
146,334
127,763
Lease financing receivables
310
Warehouse lines of credit
244,131
149,576
Home equity
235,919
226,782
Consumer:
RPG loans
3,022
1,827
Credit cards
9,321
9,030
Overdrafts
1,105
944
Other consumer
12,608
13,556
Total loans**
Less: Allowance for loan losses
22,772
23,026
Total loans, net
* - Loans acquired through the Banks Correspondent Lending channel are generally outside of the Banks historical market footprint.
** - Total loans are presented net of premiums, discounts and net loan origination fees and costs.
Purchased Credit Impaired (PCI) Loans
The contractual amount of PCI loans accounted for under ASC 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, decreased from $58 million as of December 31, 2013 to $39 million as of June 30, 2014. The carrying value of these loans was $41 million as of December 31, 2013 compared to $27 million as of June 30, 2014.
The table below reconciles the contractually required and carrying amounts of PCI loans at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
Contractually-required principal
38,934
57,992
Non-accretable amount
(9,292
(13,582
Accretable amount
(2,487
(3,457
Carrying value of loans
27,155
40,953
The following table presents a rollforward of the accretable amount on PCI loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
Balance, beginning of period
(2,765
(2,300
(3,231
Transfers between non-accretable and accretable
(1,029
(712
(2,340
(1,696
Net accretion into interest income on loans, including loan fees
1,307
1,631
3,310
3,263
Other changes
283
Balance, end of period
(1,381
16
Credit Quality Indicators
Based on the Banks internal analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class as defined in Republics Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 follows:
Purchased
Credit
Impaired
Special
Doubtful /
Loans -
Rated
Pass
Mention *
Substandard *
Loss
Group 1
Substandard
Loans**
28,233
13,182
1,779
43,194
Owner occupied - correspondent
1,678
2,048
4,600
8,326
713,947
9,589
16,736
18,361
Commercial real estate -
Purchased whole loans
37,725
124
2,388
872
142,056
901
1,899
1,263
215
2,246
40
78
1,172,703
40,541
38,539
26,897
258
1,278,938
27,431
10,994
2,810
41,235
919
1,292
7,936
10,147
709,610
11,125
25,296
27,142
40,591
128
2,386
1,246
123,646
296
2,035
1,564
222
250
2,014
2,264
18
66
33
1,057,609
40,167
44,083
40,731
1,182,812
* - Special Mention and Substandard loans include $1 million and $5 million at June 30, 2014 and $1 million and $6 million at December 31, 2013, respectively, which were removed from the PCI population due to a post-acquisition troubled debt restructuring.
** - The above tables exclude all non-classified residential real estate and consumer loans at the respective period ends. The tables also exclude most non-classified small commercial & industrial and commercial real estate relationships totaling $100,000 or less. These loans are not rated by the Company since they are accruing interest and are not past due 80-days-or-more.
17
Allowance for Loan Losses
Activity in the allowance for loan losses (Allowance) follows:
Allowance, beginning of period
22,367
23,563
23,729
Charge offs - Traditional Banking
(715
(2,562
(1,627
(3,117
Charge offs - RPG
Total charge offs
Recoveries - Traditional Banking
364
860
Recoveries - RPG
63
140
526
739
Total recoveries
427
585
1,383
1,599
Net (charge offs) recoveries - Traditional Banking
(351
(2,117
(770
(2,257
Net (charge offs) recoveries - RPG
Net (charge offs) recoveries
(1,977
(244
(1,518
Provision for losses - Traditional Banking
710
1,045
470
1,019
Provision for losses - RPG
(140
(480
(739
Total provision for losses
Allowance, end of period
22,491
The Allowance calculation includes the following qualitative factors, which are considered in combination with the Banks historical loss rates in determining the general loss reserve within the Allowance:
· Changes in nature, volume and seasoning of the portfolio;
· Changes in experience, ability and depth of lending management and other relevant staff;
· Changes in the quality of the Banks credit review system;
· Changes in financing policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and collection, charge-off, and recovery practices not considered elsewhere in estimating credit losses;
· Changes in the volume and severity of past due, non-accrual and classified loans;
· Changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral-dependent loans;
· Changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments that affect the collectibility of portfolios, including the condition of various market segments;
· The existence and effect of any concentrations of credit, and changes in the level of such concentrations; and
· The effect of other external factors such as competition and legal and regulatory requirements on the level of estimated credit losses in the institutions existing portfolio.
The following tables present the activity in the Allowance by portfolio class for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
Commercial
Residential Real Estate
Real Estate -
Lease
Owner Occupied
Non Owner Occupied
Construction &
Commercial &
Financing
Bank Originated
Correspondent
Real Estate
Whole Loans
Land Development
Industrial
Receivables
Beginning balance
7,751
984
7,901
34
1,192
1,080
Provision for losses
460
(141
(206
(185
70
Charge offs
(202
(7
(1
(20
Recoveries
46
84
Ending balance
8,055
839
7,696
1,090
1,152
(continued)
Warehouse
Consumer
Lines of
Home
RPG
Cards
477
2,371
276
212
133
235
113
(217
(37
(142
97
610
2,403
286
Finance
June 30, 2013 (in thousands)
6,984
924
8,781
3,101
727
(173
(916
244
(512
(115
(651
(600
(310
100
61
49
7,563
642
8,763
1,587
433
1,909
326
209
135
29
83
71
81
(93
(50
(130
99
90
462
1,932
344
249
205
19
The following tables present the activity in the Allowance by portfolio class for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
7,816
1,023
8,309
1,296
1,089
578
(171
(384
(273
(419
(22
(374
(18
80
145
85
449
2,396
289
199
126
161
160
(283
(42
(293
(156
55
214
182
7,006
1,049
8,843
2,769
580
1,071
(263
506
(620
386
(713
(158
(665
79
38
54
541
2,348
210
198
151
(79
(352
184
127
59
(136
(60
(305
(170
72
229
165
20
Non-performing Loans and Other Assets
Detail of non-performing loans and other assets follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Loans on non-accrual status(1)
19,606
19,104
Loans past due 90-days-or-more and still on accrual(2)
734
1,974
Total non-performing loans
20,340
21,078
Total non-performing assets
31,953
38,180
Credit Quality Ratios
Non-performing loans to total loans
0.75
%
0.81
Non-performing assets to total loans (including OREO)
1.17
1.46
Non-performing assets to total assets
0.92
1.13
(1) Loans on non-accrual status include impaired loans, which are discussed subsequently in Footnote 3 in this section of the filing.
(2) All loans past due 90-days-or-more and still accruing were PCI loans accounted for under ASC 310-30.
The following table presents the recorded investment in non-accrual loans and loans past due 90-days-or-more and still on accrual by class:
Past Due 90-Days-or-More
Non-Accrual
and Still Accruing Interest*
9,702
8,538
173
673
1,250
1,279
5,008
7,643
561
Construction & land dev.
1,990
131
327
1,231
1,444
1,128
92
* - For all periods presented, loans past due 90-days-or-more and still on accrual consist entirely of PCI loans.
Non-accrual loans and loans past due 90-days-or-more and still on accrual include both smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment and individually classified impaired loans. Non-accrual loans are typically returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and held current for six consecutive months and future contractual payments are reasonably assured. Troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) on non-accrual status are reviewed for return to accrual status on an individual basis, with additional consideration given to performance under the modified terms.
21
Delinquent Loans
The following tables present the aging of the recorded investment in loans by class:
30 - 59
60 - 89
90 or More
Days
Total Not
Delinquent
Delinquent*
1,462
3,114
6,344
1,121,175
223
98,230
638
1,385
2,140
756,536
39,119
146,203
284
25
653
235,266
93
96
2,926
75
9,246
979
12,515
2,868
2,095
7,099
12,062
2,712,955
Delinquency ratio**
0.11
0.08
0.26
0.44
1,956
733
3,668
6,357
1,091,438
195
967
1,293
109,516
874
384
3,940
5,198
767,975
332
167
499
43,852
1,415
126,348
665
48
397
1,110
225,672
87
98
8,932
159
785
67
27
94
13,462
4,335
2,165
9,723
16,223
2,573,569
0.17
0.38
0.63
* - Except for PCI loans, all loans 90-days-or-more past due as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were on non-accrual status.
** - Delinquency ratio equals delinquent loans divided by total loans.
Impaired Loans
The Bank defines impaired loans as follows:
· All loans internally rated as Substandard, Doubtful or Loss;
· All loans internally rated in a PCI category with cash flows that have deteriorated from managements initial estimate;
· All loans on non-accrual status and non-PCI loans past due 90 days-or-more still on accrual;
· All retail and commercial TDRs; and
· Any other situation where the full collection of the total amount due for a loan is improbable or otherwise meets the definition of impaired.
See the section titled Credit Quality Indicators in this section of the filing for additional discussion regarding the Banks loan classification structure.
Information regarding the Banks impaired loans follows:
Loans with no allocated Allowance
31,397
36,721
Loans with allocated Allowance
61,605
71,273
Total impaired loans
93,002
107,994
Amount of the Allowance allocated
5,866
6,674
Approximately $15 million and $24 million of impaired loans at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were PCI loans. Approximately $6 million of impaired loans at both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were formerly PCI loans which became classified as impaired through a troubled debt restructuring.
23
The following tables present the balance in the Allowance and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio class based on impairment method as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
Allowance:
Ending Allowance balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment, excluding PCI loans
3,459
853
256
Collectively evaluated for impairment
4,553
625
6,340
834
835
PCI loans with post acquisition impairment
503
317
PCI loans without post acquisition impairment
Total ending Allowance:
Loans:
Impaired loans individually evaluated, excluding PCI loans
41,191
3,038
25,072
2,584
4,153
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
1,084,549
91,006
715,200
37,653
140,703
909
3,745
8,615
870
9,789
95
180
4,875
2,223
177
16,906
1
78,339
233,673
12,531
2,619,523
14,663
12,492
Total ending loan balance
24
3,606
1,232
146
4,159
672
6,474
1,140
661
51
290
603
39,211
2,061
33,519
2,494
4,521
1,055,774
100,812
712,512
40,611
121,456
1,455
5,984
14,512
267
1,609
1,355
1,952
12,630
203
5,402
2,193
16,352
1,272
84,155
224,518
13,438
2,464,684
23,839
17,114
The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment by class as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. The difference between the Unpaid Principal Balance and Recorded Investment columns represents life-to-date partial write downs/charge offs taken on individual impaired credits.
As of
Cash Basis
Unpaid
Average
Principal
Recorded
Allowance
Balance
Investment
Allocated
Recognized
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:
7,276
6,857
7,104
6,925
125
Non Owner occupied - bank originated
1,767
1,591
1,474
1,401
15,825
14,848
17,236
150
18,475
2,081
2,083
4,201
4,181
4,206
121
2,008
1,867
1,903
1,794
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:
Owner occupied - retail
35,583
35,243
3,502
35,048
253
34,731
493
5,192
5,791
122
6,123
175
18,877
18,839
1,356
19,078
207
21,744
374
508
563
1,540
1,651
382
586
620
41
95,144
96,609
962
100,401
1,698
26
June 30, 2013
7,136
6,569
11,625
109
12,119
1,498
1,256
1,778
1,450
21,886
20,953
22,676
19,881
827
2,087
2,292
4,367
4,258
3,295
62
3,568
1,695
1,577
2,313
2,057
248
294
34,393
34,097
3,657
33,254
261
32,656
481
6,789
351
3,968
47
3,854
77
27,080
27,078
1,835
24,655
497
25,204
768
674
156
2,759
2,900
73
1,872
428
2,931
2,906
688
687
1,141
110,262
113,013
1,784
110,577
2,811
Troubled Debt Restructurings
A TDR is the situation where, due to a borrowers financial difficulties, the Bank grants a concession to the borrower that the Bank would not otherwise have considered. In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed of the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed under the Banks internal underwriting policy.
All TDRs are considered Impaired, including PCI loans subsequently restructured. The majority of the Banks commercial related and construction TDRs involve a restructuring of financing terms such as a reduction in the payment amount to require only interest and escrow (if required) and/or extending the maturity date of the debt. The substantial majority of the Banks residential real estate TDR concessions involve reducing the clients loan payment through a rate reduction for a set period of time based on the borrowers ability to service the modified loan payment. Retail loans may also be classified as TDRs due to legal modifications, which include: a) customers that declare bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and fail to reaffirm their debt with the Bank or b) upon death of the customer before full repayment of their loan.
Management determines whether to classify a TDR as non-performing based on its accrual status prior to modification. Non-accrual loans modified as TDRs typically remain on non-accrual status and continue to be reported as non-performing loans for a minimum of six months. Accruing loans modified as TDRs are evaluated for non-accrual status based on a current evaluation of the borrowers financial condition and ability and willingness to service the modified debt. At both June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, $13 million of TDRs were on non-accrual status.
Detail of TDRs differentiated by loan class and accrual status follows:
Troubled Debt
Restructurings on
Non-Accrual Status
Accrual Status
Restructurings
Residential real estate
6,205
33,872
40,077
4,807
17,865
22,672
700
2,690
4,022
Total troubled debt restructurings
13,133
56,459
69,592
5,514
31,705
37,219
7,486
22,041
29,527
2,608
2,705
143
4,378
13,240
60,732
73,972
28
The Bank considers a TDR to be performing to its modified terms if the loan is in accrual status and not past due 30 days or more as of the reporting date. A summary of TDRs outstanding by modification and performance under modified terms at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 follows:
Performing to
Not Performing to
Modified Terms
Residential real estate loans (including home equity loans):
Interest only payments
697
862
Rate reduction
28,287
4,299
32,586
Principal deferral
1,327
Bankrupt customer
1,336
2,331
Deceased customer
2,166
393
2,559
Total residential TDRs
33,472
6,605
Commercial related and construction/land development loans:
3,750
1,146
4,896
12,216
1,582
13,798
6,179
4,427
10,606
Total commercial TDRs
22,145
7,370
29,515
55,617
13,975
430
671
1,101
26,004
4,993
30,997
1,840
632
2,472
1,247
1,402
2,649
29,521
7,698
6,086
1,321
7,407
13,958
663
14,621
8,983
5,351
14,334
391
29,027
7,726
36,753
58,548
15,424
As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, 80% and 79% of the Banks TDRs were performing according to their modified terms. The Bank had provided $4 million and $5 million of specific reserve allocations to customers whose debt terms have been modified in TDRs as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Specific reserve allocations are generally assessed for commercial loans prior to loans being modified as a TDR, as most migrate from the Banks internal watch list and have been specifically provided for or reserved for as part of the Banks normal loss provisioning methodology. The Bank has not committed to finance any additional material amounts to its existing TDR relationships at June 30, 2014.
A summary of the categories of TDR loan modifications that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 follows:
194
545
360
30
390
714
476
1,190
443
1,633
741
118
859
192
148
1,006
1,154
1,054
1,151
2,205
1,557
2,708
As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, 44% and 57% of the Banks TDRs that occurred during the second quarters of 2014 and 2013 were performing according to their modified terms. The Bank provided $54,000 and $506,000 in specific reserve allocations to customers whose loan terms were modified in TDRs during the second quarters of 2014 and 2013. As stated above, specific reserves for commercial loans are generally assessed prior to loans being modified as a TDR, as most of these loans migrate from the Banks internal watch list and have been specifically reserved for as part of the Banks normal reserving methodology.
A summary of the categories of TDR loan modifications that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 follows:
1,042
1,470
2,512
3,594
2,177
5,771
1,103
3,536
5,713
9,307
64
1,758
641
2,399
293
753
2,885
1,243
4,128
5,167
7,344
141
8,339
8,480
13,647
15,824
As of June 30, 2014 and 2013, 39% and 86% of the Banks TDRs that occurred during the first six months of 2014 and 2013 were performing according to their modified terms. The Bank provided $142,000 and $869,000 in specific reserve allocations to customers whose loan terms were modified in TDRs during the first six months of 2014 and 2013. As stated above, specific reserves are generally assessed prior to loans being modified as a TDR, as most of these loans migrate from the Banks internal watch list and have been specifically reserved for as part of the Banks normal reserving methodology.
There were no significant changes between the pre and post modification loan balances at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
31
The following tables present loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings within the previous twelve months of June 30, 2014 and 2013 and for which there was a payment default during the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
Number of
June 30, 2014 (dollars in thousands)
149
592
June 30, 2013 (dollars in thousands)
2,712
302
358
328
3,700
32
The following tables present loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings within the previous twelve months of June 30, 2014 and 2013 and for which there was a payment default during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
1,219
1,546
1,500
4,265
3,367
365
36
4,362
4. DEPOSITS
Ending deposit balances at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:
Demand
653,814
651,134
Money market accounts
469,544
479,569
Brokered money market accounts
37,016
35,533
Savings
86,508
78,020
Individual retirement accounts*
27,404
Time deposits, $100,000 and over*
73,616
67,255
Other certificates of deposit*
68,597
75,516
Brokered certificates of deposit*(1)
68,833
86,421
Total interest-bearing deposits
Total non interest-bearing deposits
(*) Represents a time deposit.
(1) Includes brokered deposits less than, equal to and greater than $100,000.
5. FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK (FHLB) ADVANCES
At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, FHLB advances were as follows:
Overnight advance with an interest rate of 0.11% due on July 1, 2014
93,000
Variable interest rate advance indexed to 3-Month LIBOR plus 0.14% due on December 19, 2014
Fixed interest rate advances with a weighted average interest rate of 1.89% due through 2023
437,000
495,000
Putable fixed interest rate advances with a weighted average interest rate of 4.39% due through 2017(1)
100,000
Total FHLB advances
(1) - Represents putable advances with the FHLB. These advances have original fixed rate periods ranging from one to five years with original maturities ranging from three to ten years if not put back to the Bank earlier by the FHLB. At the end of their respective fixed rate periods and on a quarterly basis thereafter, the FHLB has the right to require payoff of the advances by the Bank at no penalty. Based on market conditions at this time, the Bank does not believe that any of its putable advances are likely to be put back to the Bank in the short-term by the FHLB.
Each FHLB advance is payable at its maturity date, with a prepayment penalty for fixed rate advances that are paid off earlier than maturity. FHLB advances are collateralized by a blanket pledge of eligible real estate loans. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, Republic had available collateral to borrow an additional $277 million and $282 million, respectively, from the FHLB. In addition to its borrowing line with the FHLB, Republic also had unsecured lines of credit totaling $166 million available through various other financial institutions as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Aggregate future principal payments on FHLB advances and the weighted average cost of such advances, based on contractual maturity dates are detailed below:
Weighted
Year (dollars in thousands)
Rate
198,000
1.38
2015
2.48
2016
82,000
1.74
2017
145,000
3.44
2018
97,500
1.50
Thereafter
107,500
1.80
2.00
The following table illustrates real estate loans pledged to collateralize advances and letters of credit with the FHLB:
First lien, single family residential real estate
1,121,784
1,082,624
Home equity lines of credit
101,438
105,957
Multi-family commercial real estate
14,379
13,124
6. FAIR VALUE
Fair value represents the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entitys own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The Bank used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate the fair value of each type of financial instrument:
Securities available for sale: Quoted market prices in an active market are available for the Banks mutual fund investment and fall within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Except for the Banks mutual fund investment and its private label mortgage backed security, the fair value of securities available for sale is typically determined by matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities, but rather by relying on the securities relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs).
The Banks private label mortgage backed security remains illiquid, and as such, the Bank classifies this security as a Level 3 security in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. Based on this determination, the Bank utilized an income valuation model (present value model) approach in determining the fair value of this security.
See in this section of the filing under Footnote 2 Investment Securities for additional discussion regarding the Banks private label mortgage backed security.
Mortgage loans held for sale: The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is determined using quoted secondary market prices. Mortgage loans held for sale are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Derivative instruments: Mortgage Banking derivatives used in the ordinary course of business primarily consist of mandatory forward sales contracts (forward contracts) and rate lock loan commitments. The fair value of the Banks derivative instruments is primarily measured by obtaining pricing from broker-dealers recognized to be market participants. The pricing is derived from market observable inputs that can generally be verified and do not typically involve significant judgment by the Bank. Forward contracts and rate lock loan commitments are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Interest rate swap agreements used for interest rate risk management: Interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements as part of the management of interest rate risk to modify the repricing characteristics of certain portions of the Companys interest-bearing liabilities. The Company values its interest rate swaps using Bloomberg Valuation Services derivative pricing functions and therefore classifies such valuations as Level 2. Valuations of these interest rate swaps are also received from the relevant counterparty and validated against internal calculations. The Company has considered counterparty credit risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap assets and has considered its own credit risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap liabilities.
Impaired Loans: Collateral dependent impaired loans generally reflect partial charge-downs to their respective fair value, which is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments are usually significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, net book value per the borrowers financial statements or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on managements historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and managements expertise and knowledge of the client and clients business, resulting in a Level 3 fair value classification. Collateral dependent loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.
Other Real Estate Owned: Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are subsequently accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals. These appraisals may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches, including comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments may be significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.
Appraisals for both collateral-dependent impaired loans and other real estate owned are performed by certified general appraisers (for commercial properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential properties) whose qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by the Bank. Once the appraisal is received, a member of the Banks Credit Administration Department reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal, as well as the overall resulting fair value in comparison with independent data sources, such as recent market data or industry-wide statistics. On an annual basis, the Bank compares the actual selling price of collateral that has been sold to the most recent appraised value to determine what additional adjustment, if any, should be made to the appraisal value to arrive at an estimated fair value.
Mortgage Servicing Rights: On a quarterly basis, mortgage servicing rights are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the MSRs as compared to carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an individual grouping exceeds fair value, impairment is recorded and the respective individual tranche is carried at fair value. If the carrying amount of an individual grouping does not exceed fair value, impairment is reversed if previously recognized and the carrying value of the individual tranche is based on the amortization method. The valuation model utilizes assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income and that can generally be validated against available market data (Level 2).
37
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, including financial assets and liabilities for which the Bank has elected the fair value option, are summarized below:
Fair Value Measurements at
June 30, 2014 Using:
Quoted Prices in
Significant
Active Markets
for Identical
Observable
Unobservable
Assets
Inputs
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Financial assets:
457,174
Mortgage loans held for sale
Rate lock commitments
Financial liabilities:
Mandatory forward contracts
Interest rate swap agreements
335
December 31, 2013 Using:
426,413
170
All transfers between levels are generally recognized at the end of each quarter. There were no transfers into or out of Level 1, 2 or 3 assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
Private Label Mortgage Backed Security
The table below presents a reconciliation of the Banks private label mortgage backed security. This represents the sole asset that was measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
5,270
5,688
5,687
Total gains or losses included in earnings:
Net change in unrealized gain
Recovery of actual losses previously recorded
Principal paydowns
(285
(459
(468
5,641
The Banks single private label mortgage backed security is supported by analysis prepared by an independent third party. The third partys approach to determining fair value involved several steps: 1) detailed collateral analysis of the underlying mortgages, including consideration of geographic location, original loan-to-value and the weighted average Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) score of the borrowers; 2) collateral performance projections for each pool of mortgages underlying the security (probability of default, severity of default, and prepayment probabilities) and 3) discounted cash flow modeling.
The significant unobservable inputs in the fair value measurement of the Banks single private label mortgage backed security are prepayment rates, probability of default and loss severity in the event of default. Significant fluctuations in any of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower/higher fair value measurement.
The following table presents quantitative information about recurring Level 3 fair value measurements at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
Valuation
Technique
Unobservable Inputs
Range
Discounted cash flow
(1) Constant prepayment rate
2.0% - 6.5%
(2) Probability of default
3.0% - 7.0%
(2) Loss severity
55% - 70%
December 31, 2013 (dollars in thousands)
2.5% - 6.5%
55% - 75%
39
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are summarized below:
Impaired loans:
1,597
5,039
1,165
Total impaired loans*
7,914
Other real estate owned:
918
1,515
4,239
Total other real estate owned
6,672
Mortgage servicing rights**
2,020
5,488
1,030
1,716
507
6,195
8,418
* - The impaired loan balances in the preceding two tables exclude TDRs which are not collateral dependent. The difference between the carrying value and the fair value of impaired loans measured at fair value is reconciled in a subsequent table of this Footnote and represents estimated selling costs to liquidate the underlying collateral on such debt.
The following tables present quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
(Weighted
Average)
Impaired loans - residential real estate owner occupied - bank originated
Sales comparison approach
Adjustments determined for differences between comparable sales
0% - 33% (7%)
Impaired loans - residential real estate non owner occupied - bank originated
0% - 10% (1%)
Impaired loans - commercial real estate
4,796
0% - 13% (7%)
243
Income approach
Adjustments for differences between net operating income expectations
3% (3%)
Impaired loans - home equity
0% - 35% (7%)
Other real estate owned - residential real estate
13% (13%)
Other real estate owned - commercial real estate
28% (28%)
Other real estate owned - construction & land development
1,332
15% - 19% (16%)
2,907
24% (24%)
Impaired loans - residential real estate
2% - 22% (7%)
0% - 30% (19%)
0% - 10% (2%)
10% - 53% (30%)
Other real estate owned - commercialreal estate
Adjustments determined for
23% - 33% (29%)
differences between
comparable sales
2,236
17% - 58% (43%)
3,959
21% (21%)
The following section details impairment charges recognized during the period:
Collateral dependent impaired loans are generally measured for impairment using the fair market value for reasonable disposition of the underlying collateral. The Banks practice is to obtain new or updated appraisals on the loans subject to the initial impairment review and then to evaluate the need for an update to this value on an as necessary or possibly annual basis thereafter (depending on the market conditions impacting the value of the collateral). The Bank may discount the appraisal amount as necessary for selling costs and past due real estate taxes. If a new or updated appraisal is not available at the time of a loans impairment review, the Bank may apply a discount to the existing value of an old appraisal to reflect the propertys current estimated value if it is believed to have deteriorated in either: (i) the physical or economic aspects of the subject property or (ii) material changes in market conditions. The impairment review generally results in a partial charge-off of the loan if fair value less selling costs are below the loans carrying value. Impaired loans that are collateral dependent are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy when impairment is determined using the fair value method.
Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans are as follows:
Carrying amount of loans measured at fair value
7,073
7,629
Estimated selling costs considered in carrying amount
841
Total fair value
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned, which is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, is periodically assessed for impairment based on fair value at the reporting date. Fair value is determined from external appraisals using judgments and estimates of external professionals. Many of these inputs are not observable and, accordingly, these measurements are classified as Level 3. The fair value of the Banks other real estate owned properties equaled or exceeded their carrying value on an individual basis at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Details of other real estate owned carrying value and write downs follows:
Carrying value of other real estate owned
Other real estate owned write-downs
333
518
Mortgage Servicing Rights
MSRs are carried at lower of cost or fair value. No MSRs were carried at fair value at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Adjustments to mortgage banking income recorded due to the valuation of MSRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 follow:
Credit to mortgage banking income due to impairment evaluation
(160
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
The Bank has elected the fair value option for mortgage loans held for sale. These loans are intended for sale and the Bank believes that the fair value is the best indicator of the resolution of these loans. Interest income is recorded based on the contractual terms of the loan and in accordance with Bank policy for such instruments. None of these loans were past due 90-days-or-more nor on nonaccrual as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the aggregate fair value, contractual balance (including accrued interest), and gain or loss was as follows:
Aggregate fair value
Contractual balance
6,596
3,417
Gain
213
The total amount of gains and losses from changes in fair value included in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 for mortgage loans held for sale are presented in the following table:
Interest income
Change in fair value
(247
(113
Total included in earnings
208
(102
219
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of all financial instruments, at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 follows:
June 30, 2014:
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Assets:
Securities to be held to maturity
2,742,302
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
N/A
Mortgage servicing rights
5,009
6,985
8,083
Liabilities:
Non interest-bearing deposits
Transaction deposits
1,246,882
Time deposits
238,450
239,407
655,116
38,062
1,261
December 31, 2013:
2,585,476
5,409
7,337
8,272
1,244,256
257,959
259,345
618,064
38,020
1,459
45
Fair value estimates are based on existing on and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the Banks estimates.
The assumptions used in the estimation of the fair value of the Companys financial instruments are explained below. Where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using discounted cash flow and other valuation techniques. Discounted cash flows can be significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. The following fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and should not be considered representative of the liquidation value of the Companys financial instruments, but rather a good-faith estimate of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company.
In addition to those previously disclosed, the following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values and are classified as Level 1.
Loans, net of Allowance The fair value of loans is calculated using discounted cash flows by loan type resulting in a Level 3 classification. The discount rate used to determine the present value of the loan portfolio is an estimated market rate that reflects the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan portfolio without considering widening credit spreads due to market illiquidity. The estimated maturity is based on the Banks historical experience with repayments adjusted to estimate the effect of current market conditions. The Allowance is considered a reasonable discount for credit risk. The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price.
Federal Home Loan Bank stock It is not practical to determine the fair value of FHLB stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.
Accrued interest receivable/payable The carrying amounts of accrued interest, due to their short-term nature, approximate fair value resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Deposits Fair values for certificates of deposit have been determined using discounted cash flows. The discount rate used is based on estimated market rates for deposits of similar remaining maturities and are classified as Level 2. The carrying amounts of all other deposits, due to their short-term nature, approximate their fair values and are also classified as Level 2.
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase The carrying amount for securities sold under agreements to repurchase generally maturing within ninety days approximates its fair value resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Federal Home Loan Bank advances The fair value of the FHLB advances is obtained from the FHLB and is calculated by discounting contractual cash flows using an estimated interest rate based on the current rates available to the Company for debt of similar remaining maturities and collateral terms resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Subordinated note The fair value for subordinated debentures is calculated using discounted cash flows based upon current market spreads to London Interbank Borrowing Rate (LIBOR) for debt of similar remaining maturities and collateral terms resulting in a Level 2 classification.
The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to management as of the respective period ends. Although management is not aware of any factors that would dramatically affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since that date and, therefore, estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented.
7. MORTGAGE BANKING ACTIVITIES
Activity for mortgage loans held for sale was as follows:
June 30, (in thousands)
Balance, January 1
10,614
33,284
208,094
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage loans held for sale
(31,147
(199,942
1,166
5,408
Balance, June 30
24,174
The following table presents the components of Mortgage Banking income:
Net gain realized on sale of mortgage loans held for sale
3,439
5,677
Net change in fair value recognized on loans held for sale
Net change in fair value recognized on rate lock commitments
(1,521
179
(388
Net change in fair value recognized on forward contracts
453
(55
232
Net gain recognized
668
2,124
Loan servicing income
492
546
794
1,092
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
(348
(650
(662
(1,358
Change in mortgage servicing rights valuation allowance
312
Net servicing income recognized
144
56
132
Total Mortgage Banking income
Activity for capitalized mortgage servicing rights was as follows:
4,777
Additions
262
1,574
Amortized to expense
Change in valuation allowance
5,305
Activity for the valuation allowance for capitalized mortgage servicing rights was as follows:
(345
Reductions credited to operations
(33
Other information relating to mortgage servicing rights follows:
Fair value of mortgage servicing rights portfolio
Prepayment speed range
100% - 462%
105% - 550%
Discount rate
10%
Weighted average default rate
1.50%
Weighted average life in years
5.99
6.17
Mortgage Banking derivatives used in the ordinary course of business primarily consist of mandatory forward sales contracts and rate lock loan commitments. Mandatory forward contracts represent future commitments to deliver loans at a specified price and date and are used to manage interest rate risk on loan commitments and mortgage loans held for sale. Rate lock loan commitments represent commitments to fund loans at a specific rate. These derivatives involve underlying items, such as interest rates, and are designed to transfer risk. Substantially all of these instruments expire within 90 days from the date of issuance. Notional amounts are amounts on which calculations and payments are based, but which do not represent credit exposure, as credit exposure is limited to the amounts required to be received or paid.
Mandatory forward contracts also contain an element of risk in that the counterparties may be unable to meet the terms of such agreements. In the event the counterparties fail to deliver commitments or are unable to fulfill their obligations, the Bank could potentially incur significant additional costs by replacing the positions at then current market rates. The Bank manages its risk of exposure by limiting counterparties to those banks and institutions deemed appropriate by management and the Board of Directors. The Bank does not expect any counterparty to default on their obligations and therefore, the Bank does not expect to incur any cost related to counterparty default.
The Bank is exposed to interest rate risk on loans held for sale and rate lock loan commitments. As market interest rates fluctuate, the fair value of mortgage loans held for sale and rate lock commitments will decline or increase. To offset this interest rate risk the Bank enters into derivatives, such as mandatory forward contracts to sell loans. The fair value of these mandatory forward contracts will fluctuate as market interest rates fluctuate, and the change in the value of these instruments is expected to largely, though not entirely, offset the change in fair value of loans held for sale and rate lock commitments. The objective of this activity is to minimize the exposure to losses on rate loan lock commitments and loans held for sale due to market interest rate fluctuations. The net effect of derivatives on earnings will depend on risk management activities and a variety of other factors, including: market interest rate volatility; the amount of rate lock commitments that close; the ability to fill the forward contracts before expiration; and the time period required to close and sell loans.
The following table includes the notional amounts and fair values of mortgage loans held for sale and mortgage banking derivatives as of the period ends presented:
Notional
Included in Mortgage loans held for sale:
Included in other assets:
Rate lock loan commitments
8,051
4,393
5,571
Total included in other assets
9,964
Included in other liabilities:
11,288
8. INTEREST RATE SWAPS
During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Bank entered into two interest rate swap agreements as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. The Bank designated the swaps as cash flow hedges intended to reduce the variability in cash flows attributable to either FHLB advances tied to the three-month LIBOR or the overall changes in cash flows on certain money market deposit accounts. The counterparty for both swaps met the Banks credit standards and the Bank believes that the credit risk inherent in the swap contracts is not significant.
The swaps were determined to be fully effective during all periods presented; therefore, no amount of ineffectiveness was included in net income. The aggregate fair value of the swaps is recorded in other assets with changes in fair value recorded in OCI. The amount included in accumulated OCI would be reclassified to current earnings should the hedge no longer be considered effective. The Bank expects the hedges to remain fully effective during the remaining term of the swaps.
Summary information about swaps designated as cash flow hedges as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 follows:
Notional amount
20,000
Weighted average pay rate
2.25
Weighted average receive rate
0.19
0.21
Weighted average remaining maturity in years
Unrealized gain (loss)
(335
Fair value of security pledged as collateral
342
The following table reflects the total interest expense recorded on these swap transactions in the consolidated statements of income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
Interest expense on deposits related to money market swap transaction
Interest expense on FHLB advances related to FHLB swap transaction
Total interest expense on swap transactions
The following tables present the net losses recorded in accumulated OCI and the consolidated statements of income relating to the swaps for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 (in thousands)
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivative (Effective Portion)
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income on Derivative (Effective Portion)
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)
Cash flow hedges - interest rate swaps
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 (in thousands)
Amount of Gain Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income on Derivative (Effective Portion)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 (in thousands)
(329
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 (in thousands)
The following table reflects the cash flow hedges included in the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
Fair value included in other assets:
Fair value included in other liabilities:
9. OFF BALANCE SHEET RISKS, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
The Bank, in the normal course of business, is party to financial instruments with off balance sheet risk. These financial instruments primarily include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The contract or notional amounts of these instruments reflect the potential future obligations of the Bank pursuant to those financial instruments. Creditworthiness for all instruments is evaluated on a case by case basis in accordance with the Banks credit policies. Collateral from the customer may be required based on the Banks credit evaluation of the customer and may include business assets of commercial customers, as well as personal property and real estate of individual customers or guarantors.
The Bank also extends binding commitments to customers and prospective customers. Such commitments assure a borrower of financing for a specified period of time at a specified rate. Additionally, the Bank makes binding purchase commitments to third party loan correspondent originators. These commitments assure that the Bank will purchase a loan from such correspondent originators at a specific price for a specific period of time. The risk to the Bank under such loan commitments is limited by the terms of the contracts. For example, the Bank may not be obligated to advance funds if the customers financial condition deteriorates or if the customer fails to meet specific covenants.
An approved but unfunded loan commitment represents a potential credit risk and a liquidity risk, since the Banks customer(s) may demand immediate cash that would require funding. In addition, unfunded loan commitments represent interest rate risk as market interest rates may rise above the rate committed to the Banks customer. Since a portion of these loan commitments normally expire unused, the total amount of outstanding commitments at any point in time may not require future funding.
The table below presents the Banks commitments, exclusive of Mortgage Banking loan commitments for each year ended:
Unused warehouse lines of credit
150,368
208,424
Unused home equity lines of credit
233,511
230,361
Unused loan commitments - other
235,465
178,776
Commitments to purchase loans
50,578
Standby letters of credit
12,757
2,308
FHLB letters of credit
3,200
Total commitments
686,429
623,069
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The terms and risk of loss involved in issuing standby letters of credit are similar to those involved in issuing loan commitments and extending credit. In addition to credit risk, the Bank also has liquidity risk associated with standby letters of credit because funding for these obligations could be required immediately. The Bank does not deem this risk to be material.
At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Bank had letters of credit from the FHLB issued on behalf of a RB&T client. This letter of credit was used as a credit enhancement for client bond offerings and reduced RB&Ts available borrowing line at the FHLB. The Bank uses a blanket pledge of eligible real estate loans to secure these letters of credit.
Legal Proceedings
As previously disclosed, on August 1, 2011, a lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky styled Brenda Webb vs. Republic Bank & Trust Company d/b/a Republic Bank, Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00423-TBR. The Complaint was brought as a putative class action and sought monetary damages, restitution and declaratory relief allegedly arising from the manner in which RB&T assessed overdraft fees. To update the disclosure set forth in Republics Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013: during March 2014, the parties signed a Settlement Agreement that provided for the dismissal of the lawsuit. In April 2014, the Court entered an agreed order dismissing the case. Costs to settle the litigation were accrued by the Company during the first quarter of 2014 and paid during the second quarter of 2014. Such costs did not have a material effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
10. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Class A and Class B shares participate equally in undistributed earnings. The difference in earnings per share between the two classes of common stock results solely from the 10% per share cash dividend premium paid on Class A Common Stock over that paid on Class B Common Stock.
A reconciliation of the combined Class A and Class B Common Stock numerators and denominators of the earnings per share and diluted earnings per share computations is presented below:
Weighted average shares outstanding
20,793
20,782
20,795
20,823
Effect of dilutive securities
76
Average shares outstanding including dilutive securities
20,888
20,858
20,891
20,895
Basic earnings per share:
Class A Common Share
Class B Common Share
Diluted earnings per share:
Stock options excluded from the detailed earnings per share calculation because their impact was antidilutive are as follows:
Antidilutive stock options
15,500
122,450
128,450
Average antidilutive stock options
119,118
123,782
11. SEGMENT INFORMATION
Reportable segments are determined by the type of products and services offered and the level of information provided to the chief operating decision maker, who uses such information to review performance of various components of the business (such as banking centers and business units), which are then aggregated if operating performance, products/services, and customers are similar.
As of June 30, 2014, the Company was divided into three distinct business operating segments: Traditional Banking, Mortgage Banking and Republic Processing Group (RPG). Along with the Tax Refund Solutions (TRS) division, Republic Payment Solutions (RPS) and Republic Credit Solutions (RCS) operate as divisions of the RPG segment.
All divisions of the RPG segment operate through the Bank. The TRS division facilitates the receipt and payment of federal and state tax refund products. The RPS division is an issuing bank offering general purpose reloadable prepaid debit cards through third party program managers. The RCS division is piloting short-term consumer credit products.
Loans, investments and deposits provide the majority of the net revenue from Traditional Banking operations, while servicing fees and loan sales provide the majority of revenue from Mortgage Banking operations. Net refund transfer fees provide the majority of revenue for RPG. All Company operations are domestic.
The accounting policies used for Republics reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in the Companys 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Segment performance is evaluated using operating income. Goodwill is not allocated. Income taxes are generally allocated based on income before income tax expense when specific segment allocations cannot be reasonably made. Transactions among reportable segments are made at carrying value.
Segment information for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
Traditional Banking
Mortgage Banking
Total Company
Net interest income
27,441
Other non-interest income
6,361
432
6,864
883
2,268
23,929
1,013
Income (loss) before income tax expense
9,163
(81
Income tax expense (benefit)
3,210
(29
Net income (loss)
5,953
421
Segment end of period assets
3,434,716
12,231
18,377
Net interest margin
3.35
NM
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
28,606
6,660
185
6,920
2,255
1,868
25,443
906
3,350
8,778
1,494
(1,326
2,768
523
(464
6,010
971
(862
3,277,181
29,891
9,993
3,317,065
3.57
3.56
Segment assets are reported as of the respective period ends while income and margin data are reported for the respective periods.
NM Not Meaningful
Segment information for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 follows:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
54,554
12,180
1,125
13,450
1,443
17,349
48,536
6,900
17,728
(685
11,134
5,994
(240
4,117
11,734
(445
7,017
3.32
3.29
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
57,567
Bargain purchase gain - FCB
12,057
12,833
13,381
5,537
14,390
50,625
1,769
8,607
Income before income tax expense
19,304
4,026
6,594
Income tax expense
6,732
1,409
12,572
2,617
4,286
3.58
12. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
OCI components and related tax effects were as follows:
Available for Sale Securities:
2,941
2,997
(1,049
Net of tax
1,912
1,948
Cash Flow Hedges:
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in income
Net unrealized gains
176
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax
The following is a summary of the accumulated OCI balances, net of tax:
Balance at December 31, 2013
Change for Six Months ending June 30, 2014
Balance at June 30, 2014
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale
2,526
1,708
4,234
Unrealized gain on security available for sale for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings
484
240
724
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedge
(218
Balance at December 31, 2012
Change for Six Months ending June 30, 2013
Balance at June 30, 2013
5,610
(1,926
3,684
5,612
3,960
57
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Republic Bancorp, Inc. (Republic or the Company) analyzes the major elements of Republics consolidated balance sheets and statements of income. Republic, a bank holding company headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky, is the parent company of Republic Bank & Trust Company (RB&T or the Bank). The Bank is a Kentucky-based, state chartered non-member financial institution. Republic Bancorp Capital Trust is a Delaware statutory business trust that is a 100%-owned unconsolidated finance subsidiary of Republic Bancorp, Inc. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Republic should be read in conjunction with Part I Item 1 Financial Statements.
As used in this filing, the terms Republic, the Company, we, our and us refer to Republic Bancorp, Inc., and, where the context requires, Republic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiary; and the term the Bank refers to the Companys subsidiary bank, RB&T.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to: changes in political and economic conditions; interest rate fluctuations; competitive product and pricing pressures; equity and fixed income market fluctuations; personal and corporate customers bankruptcies; inflation; recession; acquisitions and integrations of acquired businesses; technological changes; changes in law and regulations or the interpretation and enforcement thereof; changes in fiscal, monetary, regulatory and tax policies; monetary fluctuations; success in gaining regulatory approvals when required; as well as other risks and uncertainties reported from time to time in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) included under Part 1 Item 1A Risk Factors of the Companys 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Broadly speaking, forward-looking statements include:
· projections of revenue, income, expenses, losses, earnings per share, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure or other financial items;
· descriptions of plans or objectives for future operations, products or services;
· forecasts of future economic performance; and
· descriptions of assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing.
The Company may make forward-looking statements discussing managements expectations about various matters, including:
· loan delinquencies; non-performing, classified, or impaired loans; and troubled debt restructurings (TDRs);
· further developments in the Banks ongoing review of and efforts to resolve possible problem credit relationships, which could result in, among other things, additional provisions for loan losses;
· future credit quality, credit losses and the overall adequacy of the Allowance for Loan Losses (Allowance);
· potential write-downs of other real estate owned (OREO);
· future short-term and long-term interest rates and the respective impact on net interest income, net interest spread, net income, liquidity, capital and economic value of equity (EVE);
· the future impact of Company strategies to mitigate interest rate risk;
· future long-term interest rates and their impact on the demand for Mortgage Banking products, warehouse lines of credit and correspondent lending;
· the future value of mortgage servicing rights (MSRs);
· the future financial performance of the Tax Refund Solutions (TRS) division of the Republic Processing Group (RPG) segment;
· future Refund Transfer (RT) volume for TRS;
· the future net revenue associated with RTs at TRS;
· the future financial performance of the Republic Payment Solutions (RPS) division of RPG;
· the future financial performance of the Republic Credit Solutions (RCS) division of RPG;
· the potential impairment of investment securities;
· the extent to which regulations written and implemented by the Federal Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB), and other federal, state and local governmental regulation of consumer lending and related financial products and services, may limit or prohibit the operation of the Companys business;
· financial services reform and other current, pending or future legislation or regulation that could have a negative effect on the Companys revenue and businesses: including but not limited to Basel III capital reforms; the Dodd-Frank Act; and legislation and regulation relating to overdraft fees (and changes to the Banks overdraft practices as a result thereof), debit card interchange fees, credit cards, and other bank services;
· the impact of new accounting pronouncements;
· legal and regulatory matters including results and consequences of regulatory guidance, litigation, administrative proceedings, rule-making, interpretations, actions and examinations;
· future capital expenditures;
· the strength of the U.S. economy in general and the strength of the local economies in which the Company conducts operations;
· the Banks ability to maintain current deposit and loan levels at current interest rates;
· the Companys ability to successfully implement strategic plans, including, but not limited to, those related to future business acquisitions, in general, and the Banks two FDIC-assisted acquisitions in 2012; and
· future accretion of discounts on loans acquired in the Banks two FDIC-assisted acquisitions in 2012 and the effect of such accretion on the Banks net interest income and net interest margin.
Forward-looking statements discuss matters that are not historical facts. As forward-looking statements discuss future events or conditions, the statements often include words such as anticipate, believe, estimate, expect, intend, plan, project, target, can, could, may, should, will, would, or similar expressions. Do not rely on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements detail managements expectations regarding the future and are not guarantees. Forward-looking statements are assumptions based on information known to management only as of the date the statements are made and management may not update them to reflect changes that occur subsequent to the date the statements are made.
See additional discussion under Part I Item 1 Business and Part I Item 1A Risk Factors of the Companys 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
BUSINESS SEGMENT COMPOSITION
As of June 30, 2014, the Company was divided into three distinct business operating segments: Traditional Banking, Mortgage Banking and Republic Processing Group (RPG). Along with the Tax Refund Solutions (TRS) division, Republic Payment Solutions (RPS) and Republic Credit Solutions (RCS) also operate as divisions of the RPG segment. The RPS and RCS divisions are considered immaterial for separate and independent segment reporting. Net income, total assets and net interest margin by segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are presented below:
Segment assets
For expanded segment financial data see Footnote 11 Segment Information of Part I Item 1 Financial Statements.
(I) Traditional Banking segment
Through the Traditional Banking segment, the Bank provides short-term, revolving credit facilities to mortgage bankers across the Nation through mortgage warehouse lines of credit. These credit facilities are secured by single family, first lien residential real estate loans.
Additionally, through the Traditional Banking segment, the Bank began acquiring single family mortgage loans for investment through its Correspondent Lending division in May 2014. Correspondent lending generally involves the Bank acquiring closed loans that meet the Banks specifications from its Mortgage Warehouse clients. Substantially all loans purchased through the Correspondent Lending channel are purchased at a premium. Premiums on loans held for investment acquired though the Correspondent Lending division are amortized into income on the level-yield method over the expected life of the loan.
(II) Mortgage Banking segment
Mortgage Banking activities primarily include 15-, 20- and 30-year fixed-term single family, first lien residential real estate loans that are sold into the secondary market, primarily to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC or Freddie Mac). The Bank typically retains servicing on loans sold into the secondary market. Administration of loans with servicing retained by the Bank includes collecting principal and interest payments, escrowing funds for property taxes and insurance and remitting payments to secondary market investors. A fee is received by the Bank for performing these standard servicing functions.
See additional detail regarding Mortgage Banking under Footnote 7 Mortgage Banking Activities and Footnote 11 Segment Information of Part I Item 1 Financial Statements.
(III) Republic Processing Group segment
All divisions of the RPG segment operate through the Bank. Nationally, RPG facilitates the receipt and payment of federal and state tax refund products under the TRS division. The RPS division is an issuing bank offering general purpose reloadable prepaid debit cards through third party program managers. The RCS division is piloting short-term consumer credit products.
See additional detail regarding RPG under Footnote 11 Segment Information of Part I Item 1 Financial Statements.
OVERVIEW (Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2013)
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2014 was $6.3 million, representing an increase of $203,000 compared to the same period in 2013. Diluted earnings per Class A Common Share was unchanged at $0.30 for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
Within the Companys Traditional Banking segment, net income for the second quarter of 2014 decreased $57,000 from the same period in 2013 primarily due to compression within net interest income.
The Companys Mortgage Banking segment reflected a net loss of $52,000 for the second quarter of 2014 compared to net income of $971,000 for the same period in 2013. The decrease in net income was primarily due to lower demand for long-term fixed rate mortgage products, which resulted from a rise in long-term interest rates that began in May 2013.
RPGs second quarter 2014 net income improved $1.3 million over an $862,000 net loss for the same period in 2013. The improved performance was primarily driven by the TRS division, which experienced a 47% increase in the dollar volume of tax refunds processed during the quarter. In addition, TRS experienced a $790,000 decrease in legal fees for the quarter, as the Company incurred substantial legal expenses during the second quarter of 2013 related to contract disputes with its previously two largest product providers and the Banks unsuccessful effort to acquire H&R Block Bank.
The TRS division of the RPG segment derives substantially all of its revenue during the first and second quarters of the year and historically operates at a net loss during the second half of the year, as the Company prepares for the upcoming tax season.
Other general highlights by segment for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 consisted of the following:
Traditional Banking segment
· Net income decreased $57,000, or 1%, for the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
· Provision for loan losses (Provision) was $710,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 compared to $1.0 million for the same period in 2013.
· Net interest income decreased $1.2 million, or 4%, for the second quarter of 2014 to $27.4 million. The Traditional Banking segment net interest margin decreased 22 basis points for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 to 3.35%.
· Total non-interest income decreased $299,000, or 4%, for the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
· Total non-interest expense decreased $1.5 million, or 6%, during the second quarter of 2014 compared to the second quarter of 2013.
Mortgage Banking segment
· Within the Mortgage Banking segment, mortgage banking income decreased $1.4 million, or 63%, during the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
· Overall, Republics proceeds from the sale of secondary market loans totaled $15 million during the second quarter of 2014 compared to $122 million during the same period in 2013. The second quarter of 2013 volume significantly benefited from favorable long-term interest rates. Increases in long-term interest rates, which began to occur in May 2013, continue to negatively impact demand for mortgage refinances in particular, with this impact expected to continue through 2014.
Republic Processing Group segment
· Net income improved $1.3 million for the second quarter of 2014, as the RPG segment went from a net loss of $862,000 for the second quarter of 2013 to net income of $421,000 for the same period in 2014.
· While RB&T permanently discontinued the offering of its Refund Anticipation Loan (RAL) product effective April 30, 2012, the Bank still records recoveries on RAL loans charged-off in prior periods. Additionally, RPG provides for losses on short-term consumer loans originated through the RCS division. RPG recorded a net credit to the Provision of $17,000 for the second quarter of 2014 compared to a $140,000 credit for the same period in 2013.
· Non-interest income was $2.3 million for the second quarter of 2014 compared to $1.9 million for the same period in 2013.
· Net RT revenue increased $153,000, or 9%, during the second quarter of 2014 compared to the second quarter of 2013.
· Non-interest expenses were $1.8 million for the second quarter of 2014 compared to $3.4 million for the same period in 2013.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2013)
Net Interest Income
Banking operations are significantly dependent upon net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities, and interest expense on liabilities used to fund those assets, such as interest-bearing deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances. Net interest income is impacted by both changes in the amount and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as market interest rates.
Total Company net interest income decreased $1.2 million, or 4%, for the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. The total Company net interest margin decreased from 3.56% during the second quarter of 2013 to 3.35% for the second quarter of 2014. The primary driver of the decrease in total Company net interest income and net interest margin was a continuing general decline in the Companys interest-earning asset yields without a similar offsetting decline in funding costs. Further contributing to the contraction in the Companys net interest income and net interest margin was a general lack of growth in the Companys average interest-earning assets over the past 12 months, which increased only $70 million, or 2%, over this time period. The most significant components affecting the total Companys net interest income by business segment were as follows:
Net interest income within the Traditional Banking segment decreased $1.2 million, or 4%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. The Traditional Banking net interest margin decreased 22 basis points from the same period in 2013 to 3.35%. The decrease in the Traditional Banks net interest income and net interest margin during 2014 was primarily attributable to the following factors:
· Excluding the mortgage warehouse loan portfolio (discussed below), the Traditional Banking segment continued to experience downward repricing in its loans and investment portfolios during the second quarter of 2014 resulting from ongoing paydowns and early payoffs. As a result, the yield in both the loan and investment portfolios declined from the second quarter 2013 to the same period in 2014.
· Traditional Bank loans, excluding mortgage warehouse loans, experienced yield compression of 32 basis points from the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2014. Average loans outstanding, excluding mortgage warehouse loans, were $2.42 billion with a weighted average yield of 4.93% during the second quarter of 2013 compared to $2.45 billion with a weighted average yield of 4.61% during the same period 2014.
· Traditional Bank taxable investment securities experienced yield compression of 13 basis points from the second quarter of 2013 compared to the same period in 2014. Average taxable investment securities outstanding were $511 million with a weighted average yield of 1.79% during the second quarter of 2013 compared to $530 million with a weighted average yield of 1.66% during the same period in 2014.
· Average outstanding mortgage warehouse lines of credit increased $26 million from the second quarter of 2013 to the same period in 2014. Average mortgage warehouse loans outstanding were $173 million during the second quarter of 2014 with a weighted-average yield of 4.13%, compared to average loans outstanding of $147 million with a weighted-average yield of 4.55% for the same period in 2013. As a result, interest income on mortgage warehouse lines of credit increased $116,000 during the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. See additional detail regarding Mortgage Warehouse lines of credit under the section titled Loan Portfolio in this section of the filing.
· Net interest income continued to benefit from discount accretion on loans acquired from the Banks 2012 FDIC-assisted acquisitions, although to a lesser degree than it has in the past. Altogether, this discount accretion totaled $1.4 million for the second quarter of 2014 compared to $1.8 million for the second quarter of 2013, adding 17 and 22 basis points, respectively, to the net interest margin for these periods. Management projects accretion of loan discounts related to the 2012 FDIC-assisted acquisitions to be approximately $647,000 for the remainder of 2014. Similar to the second quarter 2014, the accretion estimate for the remainder of 2014 could be positively impacted by positive workout arrangements in which the Bank receives loan payoffs for amounts greater than the loans respective carrying values.
The downward repricing of interest-earning assets is expected to continue to cause compression in Republics net interest income and net interest margin in the near future. Because the Federal Funds Target Rate (FFTR), the index which many of the Banks short-term deposit rates track, has remained at a target range between 0.00% and 0.25%, no future FFTR decreases from the Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) are possible, exacerbating the compression to the Banks net interest income and net interest-bearing margin caused by its repricing loans and investments.
In addition to the margin compression challenges noted above, the Bank has employed certain strategies over the past 15 months to improve its net interest income. These strategies have expectedly had a negative impact on the Banks interest rate risk position in a rising rate environment. Managements future strategies to improve its net interest income will likely continue to be impacted by the Banks overall interest rate risk position at that time.
The Bank is unable to precisely determine its net interest income and net interest margin in the future because several factors remain unknown, including, but not limited to, the future demand for the Banks financial products and its overall future liquidity needs, among many other factors.
See additional detail regarding the Banks interest rate risk position and interest rate risk mitigation strategies under the section titled Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk in this section of the filing.
Table 1 provides detailed total Company information as to average balances, interest income/expense and rates by major balance sheet category for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
Table 1 Total Company Average Balance Sheets and Interest Rates for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
Average Balance
Average Rate
Interest-earning assets:
Taxable investment securities, including FHLB stock(1)
530,472
1.66
511,225
2,293
1.79
Federal funds sold and other interest-earning deposits
128,473
127,696
Loans and fees(2)(3)
2,632,190
4.58
2,590,643
4.90
Total interest-earning assets
3,291,135
3.94
3,229,564
4.23
(22,430
(23,345
Non interest-earning assets:
Non interest-earning cash and cash equivalents
62,784
70,219
33,055
33,336
Other assets(1)
94,627
45,335
Total assets
3,459,171
3,355,109
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Transaction accounts
742,116
0.06
694,224
119
0.07
478,871
0.16
511,252
0.12
171,569
265
0.62
188,742
323
0.68
Brokered money market and brokered CDs
104,938
361
121,660
385
1.27
1,497,494
0.25
1,515,878
259,132
0.03
149,237
562,209
2.32
588,712
2.54
6.10
Total interest-bearing liabilities
2,360,075
0.82
2,295,067
0.93
Non interest-bearing liabilities and Stockholders equity
526,599
492,442
15,388
18,956
Stockholders equity
557,109
548,644
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
Net interest spread
3.12
3.30
(1) For the purpose of this calculation, the fair market value adjustment on investment securities resulting from FASB ASC Topic 320, Investments Debt and Equity Securities, is included as a component of other assets.
(2) The amount of loan fee income included in total interest income was $2.3 million and $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
(3) Average balances for loans include the principal balance of non-accrual loans and loans held for sale. Average balances are net of all premiums, discounts, fees and costs.
65
Table 2 illustrates the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of total Company interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities impacted Republics interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect to (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), (ii) changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume) and (iii) net change. The changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.
Table 2 Total Company Volume/Rate Variance Analysis for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
Compared to
Increase / (Decrease) Due to
Total Net Change
Volume
Interest income:
Taxable investment securities, including FHLB stock
(88
(425
Loans and fees
(1,625
2,010
(3,635
Net change in interest income
(1,714
2,349
(4,063
Interest expense:
(34
(39
(58
Brokered money market and brokered CDs
(24
(223
(28
(653
Net change in interest expense
(497
(959
Net change in net interest income
(1,217
3,308
(4,525
Provision for Loan Losses (Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2013)
The Company recorded a net provision of $693,000 for the second quarter 2014, compared to a net provision of $905,000 for the same period in 2013. The significant components comprising the Companys Provision by business segment were as follows:
The Traditional Banking Provision during the second quarter of 2014 was a provision of $710,000, a $335,000 improvement from the $1.0 million net charge recorded during the second quarter of 2013. The improvement in the Provision from the second quarter of 2013 to 2014 was primarily due to the following:
· The Traditional Bank posted a net increase of $905,000 in allocations associated with Pass rated loans during the second quarter of 2014 compared to a net increase of $1.6 million for the same period in 2013. The change in the provisions associated with the Banks Pass rated credits, represented a positive swing in provision expense of approximately $700,000 for the quarter. The increase during the second quarter of 2014 was primarily driven by increases in residential real estate loans and outstanding warehouse lines of credit during the period. The increase in allocations during the second quarter of 2013 was generally associated with increases in commercial real estate (CRE) loans driven by the Banks 2013 CRE promotional products.
· The Traditional Bank posted a net increase of $75,000 in the Provision associated with loans rated Substandard for the second quarter of 2014 compared to a net decrease of $1.5 million for the same period in 2013. During the second quarter of 2014 and 2013, the Bank had no significant impairment charges for individually evaluated Substandard relationships. The change in the provisions associated with the Banks substandard rated credits, represented a negative swing in provision expense of approximately $1.6 million for the quarter.
· The Traditional Bank posted net increases of $33,000 and $178,000 to the Provision during the second quarters of 2014 and 2013 associated with small-dollar, retail nonaccrual loans. Provisions for these loans during the periods were partially driven by an increase in the portfolio balance and partially by the Banks updated migration analysis. The change in the provisions associated with the Banks small dollar and retail non accrual credits, represented a positive swing in provision expense of approximately $145,000 for the quarter.
· The Traditional Bank posted net increases of $5,000 and $746,000 to the Provision during the second quarters of 2014 and 2013 associated with purchased credit impaired (PCI) loans. Increases in the Provision reflect probable shortfalls in cash flows below initial estimates for these loans. Credits to the Provision generally reflect reversals of provisions made in prior periods due to positive loan workouts. The change in the provisions associated with the Banks PCI credits, represented a positive swing in provision expense of approximately $741,000 for the quarter.
· The Traditional Bank posted a net decrease of $308,000 in Provision associated with loans rated Special Mention for the second quarter of 2014 compared to a net decrease of $39,000 for the same period in 2013. The decrease during the second quarter of 2014 was primarily driven by an updated cash flow analysis of the Banks retail troubled debt restructured loans. The change in the provisions associated with the Banks special mention credits, represented a positive swing in provision expense of approximately $269,000 for the quarter.
As a percentage of total loans, the Traditional Banking Allowance decreased to 0.84% at June 30, 2014 compared to 0.89% at December 31, 2013 and 0.86% at June 30, 2013. The Company believes, based on information presently available, that it has adequately provided for loan losses at June 30, 2014.
See the sections titled Allowance for Loan Losses and Asset Quality in this section of the filing under Comparison of Financial Condition for additional discussion regarding the Provision and the Banks credit quality.
As previously reported, the Company ceased offering the RAL product effective April 30, 2012. During the second quarter 2014 and 2013, the Bank recorded recoveries of $63,000 and $140,000 to the Provision for the collection of prior period RAL charge-offs. Additionally, the Bank recorded $46,000 to the Provision during the second quarter of 2014 associated with short-term consumer loans originated by the RCS division. Because RCS loans first piloted in September 2013, no such expense applied for the same period in 2013.
An analysis of changes in the Allowance and selected credit quality ratios follows:
Table 3 Summary of Loan Loss Experience for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
Allowance at beginning of period
Charge offs:
Recoveries:
Refund Anticipation Loans
Net charge offs
Provision - Traditional Banking
Provision - RPG Loans
Total Provision
Allowance at end of period
Credit Quality Ratios:
Allowance to total loans
0.84
0.86
Allowance to non-performing loans
112
Annualized net loan charge offs to average loans - Total Company
0.04
Annualized net loan charge offs to average loans - Traditional Banking
0.05
0.33
68
Non-interest Income (Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2013)
Non-interest income decreased $1.3 million, or 12%, for the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. The most significant components comprising the total Companys change in non-interest income by business segment were as follows:
Traditional Banking segment non-interest income decreased $299,000, or 4%, for the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
Net gains on the sale of OREO decreased $770,000, or 74%, from a net gain of $1.0 million recorded during the second quarter of 2013 to $264,000 for the same period in 2014.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased from $3.5 million for the second quarter of 2013 to $3.6 million for the second quarter of 2014. The Bank earns a substantial majority of its fee income related to its overdraft service program from the per item fee it assesses its customers for each insufficient funds check or electronic debit presented for payment. The total per item fees, net of refunds, included in service charges on deposits for the quarter ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $1.9 million and $2.0 million. The total daily overdraft charges, net of refunds, included in interest income for the quarters ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $400,000 and $410,000.
During the second quarter of 2014, the Bank recorded $379,000 from an increase in the cash surrender value of its Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI), an investment first made by the Bank in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Within the Mortgage Banking segment, mortgage banking income decreased $1.4 million, or 63%, during the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. Overall, Republics proceeds from the sale of secondary market loans totaled $15 million during the second quarter of 2014 compared to $122 million during the same period in 2013. The second quarter of 2013 volume significantly benefited from favorable long-term interest rates. Increases in long-term interest rates, which began during May 2013, continue to negatively impact demand for mortgage refinances in particular, with this impact expected to continue through 2014.
RPG non-interest income increased $400,000, or 21%, during the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 partially due to the TRS division, which experienced a 47% increase in the dollar volume of tax refunds processed. This increase was driven by a rise in self-prepared, on-line product volume in combination with growth in retail store-front traffic, a direct result of new contracts between the Company and third party tax preparation companies. Additionally, the RCS division recorded $150,000 in fee income during the second quarter of 2014 related to the initiation of one of its pilot small-dollar consumer loan programs.
For additional discussion of non-interest income related to RPG, see the non-interest income discussion for the RPG business segment for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to six months ended June 30, 2013.
69
Non-interest Expenses (Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2013)
Total Company non-interest expenses decreased $3.0 million, or 10%, during the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. The most significant components comprising the change in non-interest expense by business segment were as follows:
For the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, Traditional Banking non-interest expenses decreased $1.5 million, or 6%.
Salaries and benefits decreased $1.1 million, or 8%, for the second quarter of 2014. Contributing to the Banks decrease in salaries and benefits was a decrease in the Traditional Banking segments full time equivalent employees (FTEs), which declined from 735 at June 30, 2013 to 676 at June 30, 2014. The decrease in the Banks FTEs was primarily the result of a modest reduction in force (RIF) during the fourth quarter of 2013.
OREO expense decreased $398,000, or 42%, for the second quarter of 2014 consistent with the Companys reduction in REO properties from 56 properties at June 30, 2013 to 31 properties at June 30, 2014.
Legal expenses decreased $447,000, or 69%, for the second quarter of 2014 due primarily to elevated legal expenses on two nonperforming loans during the second quarter of 2013.
Partially offsetting the decreases above, marketing expenses increased $98,000, or 11%, for the quarter due primarily to the Banks new brand marketing campaign, which was launched in the second quarter of 2014.
Additionally, occupancy expense increased $304,000, or 6%, during the second quarter of 2014 due to additional equipment maintenance costs, acceleration of depreciable lives on certain defunct assets, and an increase in certain leased premises, including a new Nashville banking center opened in the third quarter of 2013.
For the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, RPG non-interest expenses decreased $1.6 million, or 47%.
Legal expenses decreased $790,000, or 114%, for the second quarter of 2014 due to substantial legal expenses incurred during the second quarter of 2013 related to contract disputes with TRSs previously two largest product providers and the Banks unsuccessful effort to acquire H&R Block Bank.
Salaries and employee benefits decreased $223,000, or 14%, primarily due to a decline of six FTEs and lower contract labor staffing costs.
Occupancy expenses decreased $128,000, or 23%, for the second quarter of 2014 compared to the second quarter of 2013 primarily due to a reduction in leased square footage.
OVERVIEW (Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2013)
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was $18.3 million, representing a decrease of $1.2 million, or 6%, compared to the same period in 2013. Diluted earnings per Class A Common Share decreased to $0.88 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $0.94 for the same period in 2013.
Within the Companys Traditional Banking segment, net income for the first six months of 2014 decreased $838,000 from the same period in 2013 primarily due to compression within its net interest income.
The Companys Mortgage Banking segment reflected a net loss of $445,000 for the first six months of 2014 compared to net income of $2.6 million from the same period in 2013, primarily due to lower demand for mortgage products after a sharp rise in long-term interest rates, which began in May 2013.
RPGs first six months of 2014 net income increased $2.7 million, or 64%, over the same period in 2013. The improved performance was primarily driven by the TRS division, which experienced a 74% increase in the dollar volume of tax refunds processed during the first six months of the year. In addition, TRS experienced a $943,000 decrease in legal fees for the first six months of 2014, as the Company incurred substantial legal expenses during the first six months of 2013 related to contract disputes with its previously two largest product providers and the Banks unsuccessful effort to acquire H&R Block Bank.
The TRS division of the RPG segment derives substantially all of its revenue during the first half of the year and historically operates at a net loss during the second half of the year, as the Company prepares for the upcoming tax season.
Other general highlights by segment for the six months ended June 30, 2014 consisted of the following:
· Net income decreased $838,000, or 7%, for the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
· The Provision was $470,000 for the first six months of 2014 compared to $1.0 million for the same period in 2013.
· Net interest income decreased $3.0 million, or 5%, for the first six months of 2014 to $54.6 million. The Traditional Banking segment net interest margin decreased 26 basis points for the first six months of 2014 to 3.32%.
· Total non-interest income decreased $1.2 million, or 9%, for the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
· Total non-interest expense decreased $2.1 million, or 4%, during the first six months of 2014 compared to the first six months of 2013.
· Total non-performing loans to total loans for the Traditional Banking segment was 0.75% at June 30, 2014, compared to 0.81% at December 31, 2013 and 0.92% at June 30, 2013.
· Gross Traditional Bank loans, excluding outstanding Mortgage Warehouse lines, increased by $39 million, or 2%, from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014.
· Outstanding Mortgage Warehouse lines of credit totaled $244 million at June 30, 2014 compared to $150 million at December 31, 2013 and $178 million at June 30, 2013.
· Traditional Bank deposits grew by $3 million, or less than 1%, from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014.
· Within the Mortgage Banking segment, mortgage banking income decreased $4.2 million, or 76%, during the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
· Overall, Republics proceeds from the sale of secondary market loans totaled $31 million during the first six months of 2014 compared to $200 million during the same period in 2013. The first six months of 2013 significantly benefited from favorable long-term interest rates through May 2013, when sharp increases in such interest rates began negatively affecting demand for mortgage banking products. This negative impact on demand continued through the remainder of 2013, on into the first six months of 2014 and is expected to continue through the remainder of 2014.
· Net income increased $2.7 million, or 64%, for the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
· The total dollar volume of tax refunds processed during the first six months of 2014 tax season increased $3 billion, or 74%, from the first six months of 2013 tax season due primarily to a rise in self-prepared, on-line product volume in combination with growth in retail store-front traffic, a direct result of new contracts between the Company and third party tax preparation companies.
· Net RT revenue increased $2.5 million, or 18%, during the first six months of 2014 compared to the first six months of 2013.
· While RB&T permanently discontinued the offering of its RAL product effective April 30, 2012, the Bank still records recoveries on RAL loans charged-off in prior periods. Additionally, RPG provides for losses on short-term consumer loans originated through the RCS division. RPG recorded a net credit to the Provision of $480,000 for the first six months of 2014, compared to a $739,000 credit for the same period in 2013.
· Non-interest income was $17.3 million for the first six months of 2014 compared to $14.4 million for the same period in 2013.
· Non-interest expenses were $6.9 million for the first six months of 2014 compared to $8.6 million for the same period in 2013.
· The Bank resolved its contract dispute with Liberty Tax Service (Liberty) during January 2014. With the matter resolved, RB&T entered into a new two-year agreement with Liberty in which it will begin processing refunds for Liberty clients in January 2015. Beginning with the first quarter 2015 tax season, the contract is expected to increase RPGs annual net revenue for the two-year term of the contract by an average of approximately 16% over its 2013 net annual revenue level. Additional overhead expenses with the new contract are expected to be minimal.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2013)
Banking operations are significantly dependent upon net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans and investment securities and the interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities used to fund those assets, such as interest-bearing deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and FHLB advances. Net interest income is impacted by both changes in the amount and composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as market interest rates.
Total Company net interest income decreased $3.0 million, or 5%, for the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. The total Company net interest margin decreased from 3.56% during the first six months of 2013 to 3.29% for the first six months of 2014. The primary driver of the decrease in total Company net interest income and net interest margin was a continuing general decline in the Companys interest-earning asset yields without a similar decline in funding costs. Further contributing to the contraction in the Companys net interest income and net interest margin was a general lack of growth in the Companys average interest-earning assets over the past 12 months, which increased only $77 million, or 2%, over this time period. The most significant components affecting the total Companys net interest income by business segment were as follows:
Net interest income within the Traditional Banking segment decreased $3.0 million, or 5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. The Traditional Banking net interest margin decreased 26 basis points from the same period in 2013 to 3.32%. The decrease in the Traditional Banks net interest income and net interest margin during 2014 was primarily attributable to the following factors:
· Excluding outstanding mortgage warehouse loans (discussed below), the Traditional Banking segment continued to experience downward repricing in its loans and investment portfolios during the first six months of 2014 resulting from ongoing paydowns and early payoffs. As a result, the yield in both the loan and investment portfolios declined from the first six months of 2013 to the same period in 2014.
· Traditional Bank loans, excluding mortgage warehouse loans, experienced yield compression of 27 basis points from the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2014. Average loans outstanding, excluding mortgage warehouse loans, were $2.42 billion with a weighted average yield of 4.94% during the first six months of 2013 compared to $2.44 billion with a weighted average yield of 4.67% during the same period 2014.
· Traditional Bank taxable investment securities experienced yield compression of 14 basis points from the first six months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2014. Average taxable investment securities outstanding were $510 million with a weighted average yield of 1.82% during the first six months of 2013 compared to $515 million with a weighted average yield of 1.68% during the same period in 2014.
· Despite a strong quarter of growth and higher average outstanding balances in Mortgage Warehouse loans during the second quarter of 2014, average outstanding balances for the mortgage warehouse loan portfolio during the first six months of 2014 decreased $2 million compared to the same period in 2013. The decline in average outstanding balances for the first six months of 2014 was due primarily to a higher interest rate environment during the first six months of the year, which contributed to a decreased demand for the product. More specifically, long-term residential mortgage rates increased approximately 100 basis points in May 2013. The rapid rise in rates greatly diminished refinance demand for consumer mortgage products through the Banks mortgage company clients, thereby decreasing the mortgage company clients usage of their mortgage warehouse lines of credit. Average mortgage warehouse loans outstanding were $145 million during the first six months of 2014 with a weighted-average yield of 4.15%, compared to average loans outstanding of $147 million with a weighted-average yield of 4.54% for the same period in 2013. As a result, interest income on mortgage warehouse lines of credit decreased $334,000 during the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
· Net interest income continued to benefit from discount accretion on loans acquired from the Banks 2012 FDIC-assisted acquisitions, although to a lesser degree. Altogether, this discount accretion totaled $3.5 million for the first six months of 2014 compared to $3.3 million for the first six months of 2013, adding 21 and 20 basis points, respectively, to the net interest margin for these periods. Management projects accretion of loan discounts related to the 2012 FDIC-assisted acquisitions to be approximately $647,000 for the remainder of 2014. Similar to the first six months of 2014, the accretion estimate for the remainder of 2014 could be positively impacted by positive workout arrangements in which the Bank receives loan payoffs for amounts greater than the loans respective carrying values.
The downward repricing of interest-earning assets is expected to continue to cause compression in Republics net interest income and net interest margin in the near future. Because the FFTR, the index which many of the Banks short-term deposit rates track, has remained at a target range between 0.00% and 0.25%, no future FFTR decreases from the Federal Open Market Committee of the FRB are possible, exacerbating the compression to the Banks net interest income and net interest-bearing margin caused by its repricing loans and investments.
Table 4 provides detailed total Company information as to average balances, interest income/expense and rates by major balance sheet category for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
Table 4 Total Company Average Balance Sheets and Interest Rates for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
515,170
4,328
1.68
510,122
4,652
1.82
217,228
156,805
2,598,376
4.64
2,586,809
4.92
3,330,774
3.90
3,253,736
4.21
(22,687
(23,597
89,713
89,951
33,043
33,421
84,338
48,622
3,515,181
3,402,133
733,963
234
673,304
231
482,486
520,059
316
174,546
538
196,424
715
0.73
110,142
757
1.37
124,116
1.24
1,501,137
1,513,903
0.27
241,205
175,932
578,544
2.36
570,497
2.56
2,362,126
2,301,572
583,258
531,314
15,287
23,158
554,510
546,089
3.05
(2) The amount of loan fee income included in total interest income was $5.4 million and $5.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
74
Table 5 illustrates the extent to which changes in interest rates and changes in the volume of total Company interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities impacted Republics interest income and interest expense during the periods indicated. Information is provided in each category with respect to (i) changes attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), (ii) changes attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume) and (iii) net change. The changes attributable to the combined impact of volume and rate have been allocated proportionately to the changes due to volume and the changes due to rate.
Table 5 Total Company Volume/Rate Variance Analysis for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
(324
(415
168
(3,377
567
(3,944
(3,618
826
(4,444
(49
(177
(149
(11
(183
172
(25
(462
204
(575
(110
(465
(3,043
936
(3,979
Provision for Loan Losses (Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2013)
The Company recorded a net credit to the Provision of $10,000 for the first six months of 2014, compared to a net charge of $280,000 for the same period in 2013. The significant components comprising the Companys Provision by business segment were as follows:
The Traditional Banking Provision was $470,000 during the first six months of 2014, a $549,000 improvement from the $1.0 million net provision recorded during the first six months of 2013. The improvement in the Provision from the first six months of 2013 to 2014 was primarily due to the following:
· The Traditional Bank posted a net increase of $532,000 in allocations associated with Pass rated loans during the first six months of 2014 compared to a net increase of $1.3 million for the same period in 2013. The increase during the first six months of 2014 was primarily driven by increases in residential real estate loans and outstanding warehouse lines of credit during the period. The increase in allocations during the first six months of 2013 was generally associated with increases in CRE loans driven by the Banks 2013 CRE promotional products. The change in the provisions associated with the Banks Pass rated credits, represented a positive swing in provision expense of approximately $832,000 for the first six months of 2014 as compared to the first six months of 2013.
· The Traditional Bank posted a net increase of $164,000 in Provision associated with loans rated Substandard for the first six months of 2014 compared to a net decrease of $1.1 million for the same period in 2013. During the first six months of 2014 and 2013, the Bank had no significant impairment charges for individually evaluated Substandard relationships. The change in the provisions associated with the Banks substandard rated credits, represented a negative swing in provision expense of approximately $1.3 million for the first six months of 2014 as compared to the first six months of 2013.
· The Traditional Bank posted a net increase of $448,000 and $198,000 to the Provision during the first six months of 2014 and 2013 associated with small-dollar retail nonaccrual loans. Provisions for these loans during the periods were partially driven by an increase in the portfolio balance and partially by the Banks updated migration analysis. The change in the provisions associated with the Banks small-dollar retail nonaccrual credits, represented a negative swing in provision expense of approximately $250,000 for the first six months of 2014 as compared to the first six months of 2013.
· The Traditional Bank posted a net decrease of $280,000 to the Provision during the first six months of 2014 and a net increase of $786,000 for the same period in 2013 associated with PCI loans. Increases in the Provision during 2013 generally reflect probable shortfalls in cash flows below initial estimates for these loans. The net credit to the Provision during 2014 generally reflects reversals of provisions made in prior periods due to positive loan workouts. The change in the provisions associated with the Banks PCI credits, represented a positive swing in provision expense of approximately $1.1 million for the first six months of 2014 as compared to the first six months of 2013.
· The Traditional Bank posted net decreases of $394,000 and $148,000 in the Provision associated with loans rated Special Mention for the first six months of 2014 and 2013. The decrease during the first six months of 2014 was primarily driven by quarterly updated cash flow analyses of the Banks retail troubled debt restructured loans. The change in the provisions associated with the Banks special mention credits, represented a positive swing in provision expense of approximately $246,000 for the first six months of 2014 as compared to the first six months of 2013.
As previously reported, the Company ceased offering the RAL product effective April 30, 2012. During the first six months of 2014 and 2013, the Bank recorded recoveries of $526,000 and $739,000 to the Provision for the collection of prior period RAL charge-offs. Additionally, the Bank recorded a charge of $46,000 to the Provision during the first six months of 2014 associated with short-term consumer loans originated by the RCS division. Because RCS loans first piloted in September 2013, no such expense was recorded for the same period in 2013.
Table 6 Summary of Loan Loss Experience for the Six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013
0.01
Non-interest Income (Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2013)
Non-interest income decreased $2.3 million, or 7%, for the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. The most significant components comprising the total Companys change in non-interest income by business segment were as follows:
Traditional Banking segment non-interest income decreased $1.2 million, or 9%, for the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013.
As permitted by Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 805, Business Combinations, the Bank extended the measurement period related to its September 7, 2012 FDIC-assisted FCB acquisition through March 31, 2013. The initial bargain purchase gain recorded in 2012 was recast upward by $1.3 million during the first quarter of 2013, as the fair value of certain assets acquired were adjusted upward to reflect new information existing as of the acquisition date. Similar income was not recorded for the same period in 2014.
Net gains on the sale of OREO decreased $645,000, or 49%, from a net gain of $1.3 million recorded during the first six months of 2013 to a net gain of $666,000 for the same period in 2014.
Offsetting the decreases above, the Bank recorded a $570,000 increase in the cash surrender value of its Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) during the first six months of 2014, an investment first made by the Bank in the fourth quarter of 2013.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased from $6.7 million for the first six months of 2013 to $6.9 million for the first six months of 2014. The Bank earns a substantial majority of its fee income related to its overdraft service program from the per item fee it assesses its customers for each insufficient funds check or electronic debit presented for payment. The total per item fees, net of refunds, included in service charges on deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $3.7 and $3.8 million. The total daily overdraft charges, net of refunds, included in interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $770,000 and $797,000.
Within the Mortgage Banking segment, mortgage banking income decreased $4.2 million, or 76%, during the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. Overall, Republics proceeds from the sale of secondary market loans totaled $31 million during the first six months of 2014 compared to $200 million during the same period in 2013. The first six months of 2013 significantly benefited from favorable long-term interest rates through May 2013, when sharp increases in such interest rates began negatively affecting demand for mortgage banking products. This negative impact on demand continued through the remainder of 2013, on into the first six months of 2014 and is expected to continue through the remainder of 2014.
RPG non-interest income increased $3.0 million, or 21%, during the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 primarily due to the TRS division, which experienced a 74% increase in the dollar volume of tax refunds processed. This increase was driven by a rise in self-prepared, on-line product volume in combination with growth in retail store-front traffic, a direct result of new contracts between the Company and third party tax preparation companies.
Approximately 45% of RPGs total net RT revenue for the first six months of 2014 was derived from one tax service provider that has worked with RPG for several years. This providers contract with RPG expires during the 2014 calendar year. With the expiration of the contract nearing, RPG participated in a competitive bid process for this providers future RT business during the first quarter of 2014. At the conclusion of the bid process, RPG was notified that it will retain this providers RT business for another three-year period. Management, however, believes annual net RT revenue from this provider in the future will likely decline approximately 18% as a result of the newly-proposed, less favorable revenue share arrangement with this particular provider. Managements estimated decrease in annual net RT revenue from this provider is exclusive of any potential offsetting revenue resulting from an increase in volume from this or any other RPG tax providers.
Approximately 10% of RPGs total first six months of 2014 net RT revenue was derived from one new two-year contract, in which the tax preparation provider also assumed the program manager role. The TRS division of RPG has historically earned RT revenue based on its role as program manager for bank products in the tax refund process. Program managers for bank products in the tax refund processing business generally 1) supply marketing materials for bank products, 2) supply blank RT check stock for the tax offices, 3) supply tier-1 customer service to the taxpayers, which includes answering taxpayer phone calls related to the status of their RTs and the verification to third parties regarding the validity of the RT checks issued to the taxpayers by the Bank, and 4) provide overall management of the movement of refunds when received from the government, which includes exception processing and the reconciliation of all funds received and disbursed, among other duties.
Industry trends reflect larger tax preparation companies assuming the role of the program manager for the bank products in the tax refund process, which includes the obligation and costs of those responsibilities of a program manager described in the previous paragraph. In those cases where the tax preparation company is also assuming the role of the program manager, the tax preparation company is also earning more of the revenue for the associated bank products sold, as the Bank typically provides ACH services and third party risk management oversight duties. This trend will likely continue to adversely affect the margin the Company earns on its tax-related products and the overall operating results and financial condition of the RPG segment.
As previously disclosed, the RPG segment faces direct competition for RT market share from independently-owned processing groups partnered with banks. Independent processing groups that were unable to offer RALs were historically at a competitive disadvantage to banks who could offer RALs. With RB&Ts resolution of its differences with the FDIC through the Stipulation Agreement and a Consent Order (collectively, the Agreement), RB&T discontinued RALs effective April 30, 2012. Without the ability to originate RALs, RB&T continues to face stiff competition in the RT marketplace. In addition to the possible loss of volume resulting from additional competitors, RB&T has incurred substantial pressure on its profit margin for RT products via revenue sharing arrangements with its various partners.
Furthermore, RB&Ts resolution of its differences with the FDIC through the Agreement also negatively impacts RB&Ts ability to originate RT products. As previously disclosed, the Agreement contains a provision for an ERO Plan to be administered by RB&T. The ERO Plan places additional oversight and training requirements on RB&T and its tax preparation partners that may not currently be required by regulators for RB&Ts competitors in the tax business. These additional requirements have made and will likely continue to make attracting new relationships, retaining existing relationships, and maintaining profit margin for RTs more difficult for RB&T. At this time, Management cannot reasonably forecast the overall effects on RT revenue if these competitive disadvantages remain in place.
Non-interest Expenses (Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2013)
Total Company non-interest expenses decreased $3.3 million, or 5%, during the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013. The most significant components comprising the change in non-interest expense by business segment were as follows:
For the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, Traditional Banking non-interest expenses decreased $2.1 million, or 4%.
Salaries and benefits decreased $2.3 million, or 8%, for the first six months of 2014. Contributing to the Banks decrease in salaries and benefits was a decrease in the Traditional Banking segments FTEs, which declined from 735 at June 30, 2013 to 676 at June 30, 2014. The decrease in the Banks FTEs was primarily the result of a modest reduction in force during the fourth quarter of 2013.
Marketing expenses decreased $218,000, or 12%, as the Bank significantly curtailed its $0 closing cost promotion in September 2013. The promotion began in January 2013. Management expects marketing expenses for the remainder of 2014 to be higher than like periods in 2013 due to the Banks 2014 brand marketing campaign.
Occupancy expense increased $797,000, or 8%, during the first six months of 2014, primarily due to an acceleration of depreciation on defunct assets and an increase in leased premises from the first six months of 2013, including a new Nashville banking center opened in the third quarter of 2013.
For the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, RPG non-interest expenses decreased $1.7 million, or 20%.
Legal expenses decreased $943,000, or 111%, for the first six months of 2014 due to substantial legal expenses incurred during the first six months of 2013 related to contract disputes with TRSs previously two largest product providers and the Banks unsuccessful effort to acquire H&R Block Bank.
Salaries and employee benefits decreased $869,000, or 23%, primarily due to lower contract labor staffing costs and a decline of 6 FTEs.
Occupancy expenses decreased $400,000, or 28%, for the first six months of 2014 compared to the first six months of 2013 primarily due to a reduction in leased square footage and depreciation expense.
Offsetting the decreases above, the Bank Franchise expense related to the RPG segment increased $647,000, or 75%, during the first six months of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013, as additional tax was apportioned to the RPG segment due to its overall greater pro-rata share of Company gross receipts. Bank franchise tax expense represents taxes paid to different state taxing authorities based on capital. The substantial majority of the Companys Bank Franchise tax is paid to the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT JUNE 30, 2014 AND DECEMBER 31, 2013
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash, deposits with other financial institutions with original maturities less than 90 days and federal funds sold. Republic had $84 million in cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2014 compared to $171 million at December 31, 2013. The Companys restricted cash includes $2 million in a money market account as collateral to secure settlement obligations related to the RPG segments prepaid card program as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The Companys cash position decreased since December 31, 2013, in general, due to growth in the Banks loan portfolio which occurred primarily during the second quarter of 2014.
For cash held at the FRB, the Bank earns a yield of 0.25% on amounts in excess of required reserves. For all other cash held within the Banks banking center and ATM networks, the Bank does not earn interest. Due to ongoing contraction within the Banks net interest margin, managements general near-term strategy is to keep minimal amounts of cash on its balance sheet; however, this strategy continues to be impacted by the Banks ongoing interest rate risk management practices and strategies.
Securities Available for Sale
Securities available for sale primarily consist of U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. Government agency obligations, including agency mortgage backed securities (MBSs) and agency collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs). The agency MBSs primarily consist of hybrid mortgage investment securities, as well as other adjustable rate mortgage investment securities, underwritten and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae (GNMA), Freddie Mac (FHLMC) and Fannie Mae (FNMA). Agency CMOs held in the investment portfolio are substantially all floating rate securities that adjust monthly. The Bank uses a portion of the investment securities portfolio as collateral to Bank clients for securities sold under agreements to repurchase (repurchase agreements). The remaining eligible securities that are not pledged to secure client repurchase agreements may be pledged to the Federal Home Loan Bank as collateral for the Banks borrowing line or as collateral for interest rate swap agreements. Strategies for the investment securities portfolio are influenced by economic and market conditions, loan demand, deposit mix and liquidity needs.
During the first six months of 2014, the Bank purchased $60 million, $35 million and $14 million of Agency, U.S. Government and mortgage backed securities with an overall weighted average yield to maturity of 1.11% and a weighted average expected life of approximately three years. While the Companys general near-term strategy is to maintain minimal cash on its balance sheet by redeploying its net monthly cash flow into new loans or investments, the Banks levels and types of investment security purchases during the remainder of 2014 will likely be primarily impacted by its interest rate risk position at the time of the potential purchase.
Loan Portfolio
Gross loans increased by $135 million, or 5%, during the first six months of 2014 to $2.73 billion at June 30, 2014.
Table 7 Loan Composition
Following are the most significant factors contributing to fluctuations in the Banks loan portfolio:
Purchased Credit Impaired Loans Associated with the Banks 2012 FDIC-Assisted Acquisitions
During 2012, the Bank acquired PCI loans in two FDIC-assisted acquisitions with a total contractual balance of $173 million and fair value of $119 million. The Bank has mainly focused its resources toward liquidating these PCI loans. The contractual amount of PCI loans has decreased from $94 million at June 30, 2013 to $58 million at December 31, 2013 and further to $39 million as of June 30, 2014. The carrying value of these loans decreased from $63 million at June 30, 2013 to $41 million at December 31, 2013 to $27 million at June 30, 2014.
Mortgage Warehouse Lines of Credit
Mortgage warehouse lines of credit provide short-term, revolving credit facilities to mortgage bankers across the nation. These credit facilities are secured by single family, first lien residential real estate loans. The credit facility enables mortgage banking customers to originate single family, first lien residential real estate loans in their own names and temporarily funds their inventory of these originated loans until the loans are sold to investors approved by the Bank. The individual loans are expected to remain on the Banks warehouse line for an average of 15 to 30 days. Interest income and loan fees are accrued for each individual loan during the time the loan remains on the Banks warehouse line and are collected when the loan is sold to the secondary market investor. The Bank receives the sale proceeds of each loan directly from the investor and applies the funds to pay off the warehouse advance and related accrued interest and fees. The remaining proceeds are credited to the mortgage banking customer.
82
As of June 30, 2014, RB&T had $244 million of outstanding mortgage warehouse loans from total committed credit lines of $395 million. As of December 31, 2013, RB&T had $150 million of outstanding loans from total committed credit lines of $358 million. The $94 million increase in the outstanding balances of mortgage warehouse loans was due primarily to the increase in overall usage of the Banks mortgage warehouse lines during the second quarter of 2014, driven by an increase in origination activity among Warehouse clients.
RB&Ts mortgage warehouse lending business is significantly influenced by the volume and composition of residential mortgage purchase and refinance transactions among RB&Ts mortgage banking clients. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 RB&Ts mortgage warehouse volume consisted of 72% purchase transactions, in which the mortgage companys borrower was purchasing a new residence, and 28% refinance transactions, in which the mortgage companys client was refinancing an existing mortgage loan. Purchase volume is driven by a number of factors, including but not limited to, the overall economy, the housing market, and long-term residential mortgage interest rates, while refinance volume is primarily driven by long-term residential mortgage interest rates.
Correspondent Lending
The Bank began acquiring single family mortgage loans through its Correspondent Lending division in May 2014. Correspondent lending generally involves the Bank acquiring closed loans at a premium that meet the Banks specifications from its Mortgage Warehouse clients.
Loans originated through this division totaled $12 million through June 30, 2014. Loans acquired through the Correspondent Lending division generally reflect borrowers outside of the Banks historical market footprint.
Asset Quality
The composition of loans classified within the Allowance follows:
Table 8 Classified and Special Mention Loans
Doubtful
Purchased Credit Impaired - Substandard
Total Classified Loanss
38,797
44,305
Special Mention
Purchased Credit Impaired - Group 1
Total Special Mention Loanss
67,438
80,898
Total Classified and Special Mention Loanss
106,235
125,203
Purchased loans accounted for under ASC Topic 310-20 are accounted for as any other Bank-originated loan, potentially becoming nonaccrual or impaired, as well as being risk rated under the Banks standard practices and procedures. In addition, these loans are considered in the determination of the Allowance once acquisition day (day-one) fair values are final.
In determining the day-one fair values of PCI loans, management considers a number of factors including, among other things, the remaining life of the acquired loans, estimated prepayments, estimated loss ratios, estimated value of the underlying collateral, estimated holding periods and net present value of cash flows expected to be received. For the Companys 2012 FDIC-assisted acquisitions, the Bank elected to account for PCI loans individually, as opposed to aggregating the loans into pools based on common risk characteristics such as loan type.
Management separately monitors the PCI portfolio and on a quarterly basis reviews the loans contained within this portfolio against the factors and assumptions used in determining the day-one fair values. In addition to its quarterly evaluation, a loan is typically reviewed when it is modified or extended, or when material information becomes available to the Bank that provides additional insight regarding the loans performance, estimated life, the status of the borrower, or the quality or value of the underlying collateral.
To the extent that a PCI loans performance does not reflect an increased risk of loss of contractual principal beyond the non-accretable yield established as part of its initial day-one evaluation, such loan would be classified in the Purchased Credit Impaired - Group 1 (PCI-1) category; whose credit risk is considered equivalent to a non-PCI Special Mention loan within the Banks credit rating matrix. PCI-1 loans are considered impaired if, based on current information and events, it is probable that the future estimated cash flows of the loan have deteriorated from managements initial estimate. Provisions for loan losses are made for impaired PCI-1 loans to further discount the loan and allow its yield to conform to at least managements initial expectations. Any improvement in the expected performance of a PCI-1 loan would result in a reversal of the Provision to the extent of prior charges and then an adjustment to accretable yield, which would have a positive impact on interest income.
If during the Banks periodic evaluations of its PCI loan portfolio, management deems a PCI-1 loan to have an increased risk of loss of contractual principal beyond the non-accretable yield established as part of its initial day-one evaluation, such loan would be classified PCI-Substandard (PCI-Sub) within the Banks credit risk matrix. Management deems the risk of default and overall credit risk of a PCI-Sub loan to be greater than a PCI-1 loan and more analogous to a non-PCI Substandard loan. PCI-Sub loans are considered to be impaired. Any improvement in the expected performance of a PCI-Sub loan would result in a reversal of the Provision to the extent of prior charges and then an adjustment to accretable yield, which would have a positive impact on interest income.
PCI loans may be contractually past due 90-days-or-more and continue to accrue interest if future cash flows can be reasonably projected to allow continuation of discount accretion.
If a troubled debt restructuring is performed on a PCI loan, the loan is considered impaired under the applicable TDR accounting standards and transferred out of the PCI population. The loan may require an additional Provision if its restructured cash flows are less than managements initial day-one expectations. Special Mention and Substandard loans include $1 million and $5 million at June 30, 2014 and $1 million and $6 million at December 31, 2013, respectively, which were removed from the PCI population due to a troubled debt restructuring of the loan. PCI loans for which the Bank simply chooses to extend the maturity date are generally not considered TDRs and remain in the PCI population.
The Bank maintains an Allowance for probable incurred credit losses inherent in the Banks loan portfolio, which includes overdrawn deposit accounts. Management evaluates the adequacy of the Allowance on a monthly basis and presents and discusses the analysis with the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis.
The Allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. The general component is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors.
A non-PCI loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. A PCI loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the future estimated cash flows of the loan have deteriorated from managements initial estimate. Loans that meet the following classifications are considered impaired:
The Banks classified and special mention loans are generally commercial and industrial (C&I) and CRE loans but also include large single family residential and home equity loans, as well as TDRs, whether retail or commercial in nature. The Bank reviews and monitors these loans on a regular basis. Generally, loans are designated as classified or special mention to ensure more frequent monitoring. These loans are reviewed to ensure proper earning status and management strategy. If it is determined that there is serious doubt as to performance in accordance with original or modified contractual terms, then the loan is generally downgraded and often placed on non-accrual status.
Generally Accepted Account Principles (GAAP) recognizes three methods to measure specific loan impairment, including:
· Cash Flow Method The recorded investment in the loan is measured against the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate. The Bank employs this method for a significant portion of its impaired TDRs. Impairment amounts under this method are reflected in the Banks Allowance as specific reserves on the respective impaired loan. These specific reserves are adjusted quarterly based upon reevaluation of the expected future cash flows and changes in the recorded investment.
· Collateral Method The recorded investment in the loan is measured against the fair value of the collateral value less applicable selling costs. The Bank employs the fair value of collateral method for its impaired loans when repayment is based solely on the sale of or the operations of the underlying collateral. Collateral fair value is typically based on the most recent real estate appraisal on file. Measured impairment under this method is classified loss and charged off. The Banks selling costs for its collateral dependent loans typically range from 10-13% of the fair value of the underlying collateral, depending on the asset class. Selling costs are not applicable for collateral dependent loans whose repayment is based solely on the operations of the underlying collateral.
· Market Value Method The recorded investment in the loan is measured against the obtainable market value. The Bank does not currently employ this technique as it is typically found impractical.
In addition to obtaining appraisals at the time of origination, the Bank typically updates appraisals and/or broker price opinions for loans with potential impairment. Updated valuations for commercial related credits exhibiting an increased risk of loss are typically obtained within one year of the last appraisal. Collateral values for past due residential mortgage loans and home equity loans are generally updated prior to a loan becoming 90 days delinquent, but no more than 180 days past due. When determining the amount of reserve, to the extent updated collateral values cannot be obtained due to the lack of recent comparable sales or for other reasons, the Bank discounts the valuation of the collateral primarily based on the age of the appraisal and the real estate market conditions of the location of the underlying collateral.
The general component of the Allowance covers loans collectively evaluated for impairment and is based on historical loss experience, with potential adjustments for current relevant qualitative factors. The historical loss experience is determined by loan performance and class and is based on the actual loss history experienced by the Bank. Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as consumer and residential real estate loans, are included in the general component unless the loans are classified as TDRs.
In determining the historical loss rates for each respective loan class, management evaluates the following historical loss rate scenarios:
· Rolling four quarter average
· Rolling eight quarter average
· Rolling twelve quarter average
· Rolling sixteen quarter average
· Rolling twenty quarter average
· Current year to date historical loss factor average
· Peer group loss factors
For the Banks current Allowance methodology, management uses the highest of the rolling eight, twelve, or sixteen quarter averages for each loan class when determining its historical loss factors for its Pass rated and nonrated credits.
86
Loan classes are also evaluated utilizing subjective factors in addition to the historical loss calculations to determine a loss allocation for each of those classes. Management assigns risk multiples to certain classes to account for qualitative factors such as:
As this analysis, or any similar analysis, is an imprecise measure of loss, the Allowance is subject to ongoing adjustments. Therefore, management will often take into account other significant factors that may be necessary or prudent in order to reflect probable incurred losses in the total loan portfolio.
The Banks Allowance decreased $254,000, or 1%, during the first six months of 2014 to $23 million at June 30, 2014. As a percent of total loans, the traditional banking Allowance decreased to 0.84% at June 30, 2014 compared to 0.89% at December 31, 2013.
Notable fluctuations in the Allowance were as follows:
· The Bank decreased its reserve for retail troubled debt restructured loans by $444,000 during the first six months of 2014 primarily due to an updated cash flow analysis applied to this portfolio.
· The Bank decreased its reserves for PCI loans by $280,000 during the first six months of 2014 consistent with the level of positive workouts of this portfolio. The carrying balance of the Banks PCI portfolio decreased $14 million during the first six months of 2014.
· Offsetting the decreases above, the Bank increased its reserves for non-classified loans by $536,000 during the first six months of 2014 consistent with the level and pace of growth with such loans. For example, the Banks outstanding warehouse lines of credit grew $94 million during the first six months of 2014. Additionally, the Bank acquired $12 million in residential real estate loans through its Correspondent Lending division during the first six months of 2014.
Non-performing Loans
Non-performing loans include loans on non-accrual status and loans past due 90-days-or-more and still accruing. Impaired loans that are not placed on non-accrual status are not included as non-performing loans. The non-performing loans category includes impaired loans totaling approximately $20 million at June 30, 2014, with approximately $13 million of these loans also reported as TDRs. The non-performing loan category included impaired loans totaling approximately $21 million at December 31, 2013, with approximately $13 million of these loans also reported as TDRs.
Non-performing loans to total loans decreased to 0.75% at June 30, 2014, from 0.81% at December 31, 2013, as the total balance of non-performing loans decreased by $738,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2014, while total gross loans increased $135 million during the same period.
The following table details the Banks non-performing loans and non-performing assets and select credit quality ratios:
Table 9 Non-performing Loans and Non-performing Assets Summary
Loans on non-accrual status (1)
Loans past due 90-days-or-more and still on accrual (2)
(1) Loans on non-accrual status include impaired loans. See Footnote 3 Loans and Allowance For Loan Losses of Part I Item 1 Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding impaired loans.
(2) All loans past due 90 days-or-more and still accruing are PCI loans accounted for under ASC 310-30.
Approximately $11 million, or 55%, of the Banks total non-performing loans at June 30, 2014 was concentrated in the residential real estate category with the underlying collateral predominantly located in the Banks primary market area of Kentucky. The Bank does not consider any of these loans to be sub-prime. The Banks non-performing residential real estate concentration was $10 million, or 50%, as of December 31, 2013.
Approximately $8 million, or 37%, of the Banks total non-performing loans was concentrated in the CRE and construction and land development portfolios as of June 30, 2014, the same amount and percent of this concentration at December 31, 2013. These loans are secured primarily by commercial properties. In addition to the primary collateral, in many cases the Bank also obtains personal guarantees from the principal borrowers and secured liens on the guarantors primary residences at the time of origination.
The composition of the Banks non-performing loans follows:
Table 10 Non-performing Loan Composition
9,875
9,211
Non owner occupied
5,569
1,558
Table 11 Non-performing Loans to Total Loans by Class
0.00
1.15
0.99
4.84
0.09
1.22
0.61
0.50
0.64
0.60
Total non-performing loans to total loans
The composition of the Banks non-performing loans stratified by the number of loans within a specific value range follows:
Table 12 Stratification of Non-performing Loans
Number of Loans and Leases and Recorded Investment
No.
Balance <= $100
Balance > $100 <= $500
Balance > $500
Total Balance
105
5,289
4,586
Non-owner occupied
295
955
178
1,852
3,539
Commercial real estate purchased whole loans
490
974
157
6,313
8,033
4,127
3,838
139
3,410
4,094
529
599
5,366
8,174
7,538
187
Approximately $10 million in non-performing loans at December 31, 2013, were removed from the non-performing loan classification during the first six months 2014. Approximately $80,000, or 1%, were removed from the non-performing category because they were charged-off. Approximately $4 million, or 37%, were transferred to OREO, with $4 million, or 36%, refinanced at other financial institutions. The remaining $3 million, or 26%, was returned to accrual status for performance reasons, such as six consecutive months of performance. Of the $4 million transferred to OREO, one relationship accounted for 53% of the total amount transferred to OREO.
The following tables detail the activity of the Banks non-performing loans:
Table 13 Rollforward of Non-performing Loan Activity
Non-performing loans at January 1,
21,679
Loans added to non-performing status
9,739
14,955
Loans removed from non-performing status (see table below)
(9,775
(11,972
(702
(581
Non-performing loans at June 30,
24,081
Table 14 Detail of Loans Removed from Non-Performing Status
Loans charged-off
(80
(1,751
Loans transferred to OREO
(3,599
(2,906
Loans refinanced at other institutions
(3,552
(3,037
Loans returned to accrual status
(2,544
(4,278
Total non-performing loans removed from non-performing status
Based on the Banks review of the large individual non-performing commercial credits, as well as its migration analysis for its residential real estate and home equity non-performing portfolio, management believes that its reserves as of June 30, 2014, are adequate to absorb probable losses on all non-performing credits.
Delinquent loans to total loans decreased to 0.44% at June 30, 2014, from 0.63% at December 31, 2013, as the total balance of delinquent loans decreased by $4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, while total gross loans increased $135 million during the same period. With the exception of PCI loans, all traditional bank loans past due 90-days-or-more as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were on non-accrual status.
The composition of the Banks past due loans follows:
Table 15 Delinquent Loan Composition
Total delinquent loans
Table 16 Delinquent Loans to Total Loans by Class (1)
0.56
0.58
0.42
0.67
1.11
0.49
3.18
0.80
1.09
11.40
16.84
0.74
Total delinquent loans to total loans
(1) Represents total loans past due 30-days-or-more divided by total loans.
As detailed in the preceding tables, delinquent loans within the residential real estate, C&I and home equity categories decreased $2.6 million, from December 31, 2013 to June 30, 2014. CRE delinquencies decreased $3 million for the same period, with one relationship transferring to OREO during the first six months of 2014 and accounting for 62% of the decrease. Construction and land development loans increased $1 million, with one loan accounting for substantially all of the increase.
Approximately $12 million in delinquent loans at December 31, 2013, were removed from delinquent status as of June 30, 2014. Approximately $93,000 of these loans were removed from the delinquent category because they were charged-off. Approximately $4 million, or 34%, in loans were transferred to OREO with $3 million, or 24%, refinanced at other financial institutions. The remaining $5 million, or 41%, were paid current in 2014.
Table 17 Rollforward of Delinquent Loan Activity
Delinquent loans, January 1,
20,844
Loans that became delinquent
7,823
8,025
Net change in delinquent credit cards and demand deposit accounts
(56
Delinquent loans removed from delinquent status (see table below)
(11,665
(12,341
Principal paydowns of loans delinquent in both periods
(357
Delinquent loans, June 30,
16,197
Table 18 Detail of Delinquent Loans Removed From Delinquent Status
(1,226
(3,924
(4,062
(2,827
(3,841
Loans paid current
(4,821
(3,212
Total delinquent loans removed from delinquent status
Impaired Loans and Troubled Debt Restructurings
The Banks policy is to charge off all or that portion of its recorded investment in an impaired credit upon a determination that it is probable the full amount will not be collected. Impaired loans totaled $93 million at June 30, 2014 compared to $108 million at December 31, 2013, with $9 million, or 61%, of the $15 million decrease consisting of PCI loans liquidated during the first six months of 2014.
A TDR is the situation where, due to a borrowers financial difficulties, the Bank grants a concession to the borrower that the Bank would not otherwise have considered. The majority of the Banks TDRs involve a restructuring of loan terms such as a temporary reduction in the payment amount to require only interest and escrow (if required) and/or extending the maturity date of the debt. Non-accrual loans modified as TDRs remain on non-accrual status and continue to be reported as non-performing loans. Accruing loans modified as TDRs are evaluated for non-accrual status based on a current evaluation of the borrowers financial condition, and ability and willingness to service the modified debt. As of June 30, 2014, the Bank had $70 million in TDRs, of which $13 million were also on non-accrual status. As of December 31, 2013, the Bank had $74 million in TDRs, of which $13 million were also on non-accrual status.
The composition of the Banks impaired loans follows:
Table 19 Impaired Loan Composition
Troubled debt restructurings
Impaired loans (which are not TDRs)
23,410
34,022
See Footnote 3 Loans and Allowance For Loan Losses of Part I Item 1 Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding impaired loans and TDRs.
The composition of the Banks OREO follows:
Table 20 Other Real Estate Owned Composition
2,622
3,574
2,545
5,824
6,446
7,704
The composition of the Banks other real estate stratified by the number of properties within a specific value range follows:
Table 21 Stratification of Other Real Estate Owned
Number of Properties and Carrying Value Range
Carrying Value <= $100
Carrying Value > $100 <= $500
Carrying Value > $500
Total Carrying Value
389
579
1,654
1,905
4,380
550
3,514
7,549
828
1,490
1,344
4,480
164
2,689
4,851
992
10,821
Table 22 Rollforward of Other Real Estate Owned Activity
Balance, January 1,
26,203
Transfer from loans to OREO
Proceeds from sale*
(9,430
(15,624
Net gain on sale
Writedowns
(884
Balance, June 30,
15,248
* Inclusive of non-cash proceeds where the Bank financed the sale of the property.
The fair value of OREO represents the estimated value that management expects to receive when the property is sold, net of related costs to sell. These estimates are based on the most recently available real estate appraisals, with certain adjustments made based on the type of property, age of appraisal, current status of the property and other related factors to estimate the current value of the property.
Approximately 50%, or $2 million, of the CRE OREO balance at June 30, 2014 related to two properties added during 2013 located in the Banks Minnesota market. Approximately 33%, or $4 million, of the construction and land development OREO balance at June 30, 2014 related to one land development property added during 2012 located in the Banks greater Louisville, Kentucky market.
Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI)
BOLI offers tax advantaged non-interest income to help the Bank offset employee benefits expenses. The Company carried $51 million and $25 million of BOLI on its consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The Company purchased an additional $25 million of BOLI during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Total Company deposits increased $14 million, or 1%, from December 31, 2013 to $2.0 billion at June 30, 2014. Total Company interest-bearing deposits decreased $17 million, or 1% and total Company non-interest bearing deposits increased $31 million, or 6%.
Table 23 Deposit Composition
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase and Other Short-term Borrowings
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings increased $32 million, or 19%, during the first six months of 2014. The increase was primarily related to funds received for two client relationships. Management is uncertain at this time as to whether or not these additional funds will remain at the Bank on a long-term basis. The substantial majority of these accounts are indexed to immediately repricing indices such as the Fed Funds Target Rate.
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
FHLB advances increased $35 million, or 6%, from December 31, 2013 to $640 million at June 30, 2014. During the first six months of 2014, $83 million of FHLB advances with a weighted average rate of 2.93% matured, while the Bank obtained $25 million of new fixed advances at a weighted average rate of 1.85% and a weighted average life of five years. Additionally, the Bank held $93 million in overnight advances with a rate of 0.11% as of June 30, 2014.
Overall use of these advances during a given year is dependent upon many factors including asset growth, deposit growth, current earnings, and expectations of future interest rates, among others. If a meaningful amount of the Banks 2014 loan originations have repricing terms longer than five years, management will likely elect to borrow additional funds during the year to mitigate its risk of future increases in market interest rates. Whether the Bank ultimately does so, and how much in advances it extends out, will be dependent upon circumstances at that time. If the Bank does obtain longer-term FHLB advances for interest rate risk mitigation, it will have a negative impact on then current earnings. The amount of the negative impact will be dependent upon the dollar amount, coupon and final maturity of the advances obtained.
Interest Rate Swaps
Table 24 Interest Rate Swaps
Information regarding the Banks interest rate swaps follows:
Liquidity
The Bank had a loan to deposit ratio (excluding brokered deposits) of 143% at June 30, 2014 and 139% at December 31, 2013. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Bank had cash and cash equivalents on-hand of $84 million and $171 million. In addition, the Bank had available collateral to borrow an additional $277 million and $282 million from the FHLB at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013. In addition to its borrowing line with the FHLB, RB&T also had unsecured lines of credit totaling $166 million available through various other financial institutions as of June, 30 2014 and December 31, 2013.
The Bank maintains sufficient liquidity to fund routine loan demand and routine deposit withdrawal activity. Liquidity is managed by maintaining sufficient liquid assets in the form of investment securities. Funding and cash flows can also be realized by the sale of securities available for sale, principal paydowns on loans and MBSs and proceeds realized from loans held for sale. The Banks liquidity is impacted by its ability to sell certain investment securities, which is limited due to the level of investment securities that are needed to secure public deposits, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, FHLB borrowings, and for other purposes, as required by law. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, these pledged investment securities had a fair value of $250 million and $225 million. Republics banking centers and its website, www.republicbank.com, provide access to retail deposit markets. These retail deposit products, if offered at attractive rates, have historically been a source of additional funding when needed. If the Bank were to lose a significant funding source, such as a few major depositors, or if any of its lines of credit were canceled, or if the Bank cannot obtain brokered deposits, the Bank would be forced to offer market leading deposit interest rates to meet its funding and liquidity needs.
At June 30, 2014, the Bank had approximately $397 million in deposits from 60 large non-sweep deposit relationships where the individual relationship individually exceeded $2 million. These accounts do not require collateral; therefore, cash from these accounts can generally be utilized to fund the loan portfolio. The 20 largest non-sweep deposit relationships represented approximately $280 million of the total balance. If any of these balances are moved from the Bank, the Bank would likely utilize overnight borrowing lines in the short-term to replace the balances. On a longer-term basis, the Bank would likely utilize brokered deposits to replace withdrawn balances. Based on past experience utilizing brokered deposits, the Bank believes it can quickly obtain brokered deposits if needed. The overall cost of gathering brokered deposits, however, could be substantially higher than the Traditional Bank deposits they replace, potentially decreasing the Banks earnings.
Total stockholders equity increased from $543 million at December 31, 2013 to $555 million at June 30, 2014. The increase in stockholders equity was primarily attributable to net income earned during 2014 reduced by cash dividends declared. Stockholders equity also decreased to a lesser extent from stock options and common stock repurchases during the period ended June 30, 2014.
See Part II, Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds for additional detail regarding stock repurchases and stock buyback programs.
New Capital Rules Beginning January 1, 2015 the Company and the Bank will be subject to the new capital regulations in accordance with Basel III. The new regulations establish higher minimum risk-based capital ratio requirements, a new common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio and a new capital conservation buffer. The new regulations also include revisions to the definition of capital and changes in the risk-weighting of certain assets. For prompt corrective action, the new regulations establish definitions of well capitalized as a 6.5% common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, an 8.0% Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, a 10.0% total risk-based capital ratio and a 5.0% Tier 1 leverage ratio. Management has completed a preliminary analysis of the impact of these new regulations to the capital ratios of both the Company and the Bank and estimates that the ratios for both the Company and the Bank will comfortably exceed the new minimum capital ratio requirements for well-capitalized including the 2.5% capital conservation buffer under Basel III when effective and fully implemented.
Common Stock The Class A Common shares are entitled to cash dividends equal to 110% of the cash dividend paid per share on Class B Common Stock. Class A Common shares have one vote per share and Class B Common shares have ten votes per share. Class B Common shares may be converted, at the option of the holder, to Class A Common shares on a share for share basis. The Class A Common shares are not convertible into any other class of Republics capital stock.
Dividend Restrictions The Parent Companys principal source of funds for dividend payments are dividends received from RB&T. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid to the Parent Company by the Bank without prior approval of the respective states banking regulators. Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to the current years net profits, combined with the retained net profits of the preceding two years. At June 30, 2014, RB&T could, without prior approval, declare dividends of approximately $26 million.
Regulatory Capital Requirements The Parent Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by banking regulators. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on Republics financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Parent Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Companys assets, liabilities and certain off balance sheet items, as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Banking regulators have categorized the Bank as well-capitalized. To be categorized as well-capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum Total Risk Based, Tier I Capital and Tier I Leverage Capital ratios. Regulatory agencies measure capital adequacy within a framework that makes capital requirements, in part, dependent on the individual risk profiles of financial institutions. Republic continues to exceed the regulatory requirements for Total Risk Based Capital, Tier I Capital and Tier I Leverage Capital. Republic and the Bank intend to maintain a capital position that meets or exceeds the well-capitalized requirements as defined by the FRB, FDIC and the OCC. Republics average stockholders equity to average assets ratio was 15.77% at June 30, 2014 compared to 16.15% at December 31, 2013. Formal measurements of the capital ratios for Republic and the Bank are performed by the Company at each quarter end.
In 2004, the Bank executed an intragroup trust preferred transaction with the purpose of providing RB&T access to additional capital markets, if needed in the future. The subordinated debentures held by RB&T were treated as Tier 2 Capital based on requirements administered by the Banks federal banking agency. In April 2013, the Bank received approval from its regulators and unwound the intragroup trust preferred transaction. The cash utilized to pay off the transaction remained at the Parent Company, Republic Bancorp. Unwinding of the transaction had no impact on RB&Ts two Tier 1 related capital ratios and only a minimal impact on its Total Risk Based Capital ratio.
In 2005, Republic Bancorp Capital Trust (RBCT), an unconsolidated trust subsidiary of Republic Bancorp, Inc., was formed and issued $40 million in Trust Preferred Securities (TPS). The TPS pay a fixed interest rate for ten years and adjust with LIBOR + 1.42% thereafter. The TPS mature on December 31, 2035 and are redeemable at the Banks option after ten years. The subordinated debentures are treated as Tier I Capital for regulatory purposes. The sole asset of RBCT represents the proceeds of the offering loaned to Republic Bancorp, Inc. in exchange for subordinated debentures which have terms that are similar to the TPS. The subordinated debentures and the related interest expense, which are payable quarterly at the annual rate of 6.015%, are included in the consolidated financial statements. The proceeds obtained from the TPS offering have been utilized to fund loan growth (in prior years), support an existing stock repurchase program and for other general business purposes such as the acquisition of GulfStream Community Bank in 2006.
The following table sets forth the Companys risk based capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
Table 25 Capital Ratios
As of June 30, 2014
As of December 31, 2013
Actual
Ratio
Total Risk Based Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Republic Bancorp, Inc.
603,155
24.87
592,531
26.71
Republic Bank & Trust Co.
467,879
19.31
456,884
20.61
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
580,383
23.93
569,505
25.67
445,107
18.37
433,858
19.57
Tier I Leverage Capital (to Average Assets)
16.83
16.81
12.91
12.80
Asset/Liability Management and Market Risk
Asset/liability management control is designed to ensure safety and soundness, maintain liquidity and regulatory capital standards and achieve acceptable net interest income. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income as a result of market fluctuations in interest rates. The Bank, on an ongoing basis, monitors interest rate and liquidity risk in order to implement appropriate funding and balance sheet strategies. Management considers interest rate risk to be the Banks most significant market risk.
The interest sensitivity profile of the Bank at any point in time will be impacted by a number of factors. These factors include the mix of interest sensitive assets and liabilities, as well as their relative pricing schedules. It is also influenced by market interest rates, deposit growth, loan growth and other factors.
The Bank utilizes an earnings simulation model as its primary tool to measure interest rate sensitivity. Potential changes in market interest rates and their subsequent effects on net interest income were evaluated with the model. The model projects the effect of instantaneous movements in interest rates between 100 and 400 basis point increments equally across all points on the yield curve. These projections are computed based on many various assumptions, which are used to determine the range between 100 and 400 basis point increments, as well as the base case (which is a twelve month projected amount) scenario. Assumptions based on growth expectations and on the historical behavior of the Banks deposit and loan rates and their related balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the models simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes, as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies. Additionally, actual results could differ materially from the model if interest rates do not move equally across all points on the yield curve.
A model simulation for declining interest rates as of June 30, 2014 is not presented by the Bank because the Federal Open Market Committee effectively lowered the Fed Funds Target Rate between 0.00% to 0.25% in December 2008; therefore, no further short-term rate reductions can occur. Overall, the Banks Base net interest income projection as of June 30, 2014 meaningfully improved compared to the previous 12 months and the Base projection as of December 31, 2013, while the Banks interest rate risk position from rising rates modestly declined since December 31, 2013 in all Up basis points scenarios presented. The Base projection represents the Banks projected net interest income, excluding loan fees, for the next 12-month period.
As of December 31, 2013, the Banks assumption as it related to maturing FHLB advances was that the advances would be refinanced into new long-term fixed FHLB advances. During the first six months of 2014, the Bank changed its strategy regarding maturing advances and, as of June 30, 2014, planned to payoff these advances as they mature. This change in strategy served to increase net interest income in the Banks Base case, as it served to reduce funding costs in the near term. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2014, the Bank launched its Correspondent Lending division and successfully acquired $12 million in 5/1 and 7/1 jumbo and conforming ARM loans. Based on this successful launch, the Bank increased its growth assumptions related to 5/1 and 7/1 ARM loans over the next 12 months. The Banks current strategy to fund this projected growth consists primarily of variable rate, overnight FHLB advances. The use of short-term, overnight borrowings to fund the Banks correspondent loan growth provides the greatest benefit to the Banks base case scenario projection as presented in Table 26, but also causes a more negative impact to the Banks interest rate risk position in a rising rate environment.
As the Banks Correspondent Lending division continues to grow, the Bank may modify its strategy and hedge a portion of loans purchased through this division with longer term FHLB advances. Additionally, the Banks wholesale funding strategy and its future use of short- and/or long-term FHLB Advances, will be highly dependent upon both its then-current overall interest rate risk and liquidity positions. Any significant future changes in the Banks interest rate risk position or its overall liquidity would likely impact the Banks funding strategy and also significantly impact the Banks projected net interest income in all scenarios presented in Table 26.
The following table illustrates the Banks projected net interest income sensitivity profile based on the asset/liability model as of June 30, 2014. The Banks interest rate sensitivity model does not include loan fees within interest income. During the 12 months from July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014, loan fees included in interest income were $10.8 million.
Table 26 Traditional Banking Interest Rate Sensitivity for 2014
Previous
Increase in Rates
Twelve
200
300
400
Months
Base
Basis Points
Projected interest income:
Short-term investments
496
Investment securities
8,986
9,750
11,808
13,966
15,988
17,918
Loans, excluding loan fees
110,690
118,566
127,034
136,219
145,884
155,555
Total interest income, excluding loan fees
120,172
128,316
138,844
150,189
161,878
173,480
Projected interest expense:
3,978
3,567
9,062
17,062
25,448
34,642
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
3,378
6,038
8,698
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other long-term borrowings
16,768
16,068
18,345
20,638
22,951
25,067
20,817
19,688
28,790
41,078
54,437
68,407
Net interest income, excluding loan fees
99,355
108,628
110,054
109,111
107,441
105,073
Change from base
1,426
483
(1,187
(3,555
% Change from base
1.31
-1.09
-3.27
While the Banks primary interest rate risk management tool is its earnings simulation model, the board of directors of the Bank has established separate and distinct policy limits for acceptable changes in Economic Value of Equity (EVE) based on certain projected changes in market interest rates.
To combat the continued downward repricing in the Banks loan and investment portfolios during 2013, a primary strategy for the Bank during the year included the origination of loans with longer repricing durations than traditionally originated and retained within the Banks portfolio. This strategy of extending the repricing duration of the Banks loans to mitigate the negative repricing trends within its interest-earning assets negatively affected the Banks ability to maintain its interest rate risk position within its board-approved policy limits for its EVE calculations. The EVE represents the difference between the net present value of the Banks interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at a point in time.
The Bank exceeded its board-approved policy limits for changes in its EVE during the fourth quarter of 2013 and again during the first quarter of 2014. To bring changes to the Banks EVE within all board-approved policy limits during the fourth quarter of 2013, the Bank borrowed $20 million of long-term FHLB advances with a weighted average life of five years and a weighted average cost of 1.76%. Also, during the fourth quarter of 2013, the Bank executed two long-term interest rate swaps with notional amounts of $20 million to hedge its cash flows associated with certain immediately repricing liabilities.
To improve its interest rate position during the first quarter of 2014, the Bank replaced maturing FHLB advances with $25 million of new fixed rate FHLB advances having a weighted average life of five years and a weighted average cost of 1.85%. These transactions, while negatively impacting the Banks current earnings and net interest margin, improved the Banks EVE in an assumed rising interest rate environment, bringing the results of the EVE calculations back within the Banks board-approved policy limits. Based on its current balance sheet growth assumptions, including those related to maturing FHLB advances as discussed on the previous page, management does not currently project any future instances in which the Bank will exceed its board-approved policy limits. These projections, however, are subject to numerous assumptions and are subject to change on a daily basis based on, among others, managements growth strategies, the Banks balance sheet mix, overall liquidity position and then-current market conditions.
Table 27 Bank Economic Value of Equity (EVE) Sensitivity for 2014
EVE
492,302
446,370
401,696
347,690
294,031
(45,932
(90,606
(144,612
(198,271
-9.33
-18.40
-29.37
-40.27
Bank Board policy limit on % change from base
-10.00
-20.00
-35.00
-45.00
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Information required by this item is included under Part I, Item 2., Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by Republic Bancorp, Inc.s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. In addition, no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
In the ordinary course of operations, Republic and the Bank are defendants in various legal proceedings. There is no proceeding pending or threatened litigation, to the knowledge of management, in which an adverse decision could result in a material adverse change in the business or consolidated financial position of Republic or the Bank, except as set forth below.
Overdraft Litigation
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Details of Republics Class A Common Stock purchases during the second quarter of 2014 are included in the following table:
Total Number of
Maximum Number
Shares Purchased
of Shares that May
as Part of Publicly
Yet Be Purchased
Average Price
Announced Plans
Under the Plan
Period
Paid Per Share
or Programs
April 1 - April 30
May 1 - May 31
June 1 - June 30
315,640
During 2014, the Company repurchased 15,000 shares and there were 1,000 shares exchanged for stock option exercises. During November of 2011, the Companys Board of Directors amended its existing share repurchase program by approving the repurchase of 300,000 additional shares from time to time, as market conditions are deemed attractive to the Company. The repurchase program will remain effective until the total number of shares authorized is repurchased or until Republics Board of Directors terminates the program. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had 315,640 shares which could be repurchased under its current share repurchase programs.
During 2014, there were 15,000 shares of Class A Common Stock issued upon conversion of shares of Class B Common Stock by stockholders of Republic in accordance with the share-for-share conversion provision option of the Class B Common Stock. The exemption from registration of newly issued Class A Common Stock relies upon Section (3)(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933.
There were no equity securities of the registrant sold without registration during the quarter covered by this report.
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed or furnished as a part of this report:
Exhibit Number
Description of Exhibit
31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32*
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Interactive data files: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, (iii) Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2014, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
* This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant)
Principal Executive Officer:
August 8, 2014
By:
Steven E. Trager
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer:
Kevin Sipes
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Accounting Officer