Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
Commission file number: 001-13425
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Canada
98-0626225
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
9500 Glenlyon Parkway
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5J 0C6
(778) 331-5500
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Trading Symbol
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Shares
RBA
New York Stock Exchange
Common Share Purchase Rights
N/A
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Restricted Share Units
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☑ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, ”smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:
Large accelerated filer ☑
Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐
Smaller reporting company ☐
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑
At June 30, 2019 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter), the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant (assuming for these purposes, but without conceding, that all executive officers and directors are "affiliates" of the registrant) was approximately $3,573,759,165. The number of common shares of the registrant outstanding as of February 26, 2020, was 109,528,545.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, in connection with the registrant’s 2019 Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders, are incorporated herein by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS INCORPORATED
For the year ended December 31, 2019
INDEX
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
1
PART I
ITEM 1:
Business
3
ITEM 1A:
Risk Factors
10
ITEM 1B:
Unresolved Staff Comments
23
ITEM 2:
Properties
24
ITEM 3:
Legal Proceedings
26
ITEM 4:
Mine Safety Disclosures
PART II
ITEM 5:
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
ITEM 6:
Selected Financial Data
30
ITEM 7:
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
31
ITEM 7A:
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
53
ITEM 8:
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
54
ITEM 9:
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
100
ITEM 9A:
Controls and Procedures
ITEM 9B:
Other Information
103
PART III
ITEM 10:
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
ITEM 11:
Executive Compensation
ITEM 12:
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
ITEM 13:
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
ITEM 14:
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
ITEM 15:
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
104
ITEM 16:
Form 10-K Summary
107
SIGNATURES
The information discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (“Ritchie Bros.”, the “Company”, “we”, or “us”) includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Canadian securities laws. These statements are based on our current expectations and estimates about our business and markets, and include, among others, statements relating to:
Ritchie Bros.
Forward-looking statements may appear throughout this report, including the following section "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations". Forward-looking statements are typically identified by such words as “aim”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “continue”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “ongoing”, “plan”, “potential”, “predict”, “will”, “should”, “would”, “could”, “likely”, “generally”, “future”, “long-term”, or the negative of these terms, and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially.
While we have not described all potential risks related to our business and owning our common shares, the important factors discussed in “Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 are among those that we consider may affect our performance materially or could cause our actual financial and operational results to differ significantly from our expectations. Except as required by applicable securities law and regulations of relevant securities exchanges, we do not intend to update publicly any forward-looking statements, even if our expectations have been affected by new information, future events or other developments. You should consider our forward-looking statements in light of the factors listed or referenced under “Risk Factors” herein and other relevant factors.
2
ITEM 1: BUSINESS
Company Overview
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (“Ritchie Bros.”, the “Company”, “we”, or “us”) (NYSE & TSX: RBA) was founded in 1958 in Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada and is a world leader in asset management and disposition of used industrial equipment and other durable assets, selling $5.14 billion of used equipment and other assets during 2019. Our expertise, unprecedented global reach, market insight, and trusted portfolio of brands provide us with a unique position in the used equipment market. We sell used equipment for our customers through live, unreserved auctions at 40 auction sites worldwide, which are also simulcast online to reach a global bidding audience and through our online marketplaces.
Through our unreserved auctions, online marketplaces, and private brokerage services, we sell a broad range of used and unused equipment, including earthmoving equipment, truck trailers, government surplus, oil and gas equipment and other industrial assets. Construction and heavy machinery comprise the majority of the equipment sold. Customers selling equipment through our sales channels include end users (such as construction companies), equipment dealers, original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and other equipment owners (such as rental companies). Our customers participate in a variety of sectors, including heavy construction, transportation, agriculture, energy, and mining.
We operate globally with locations in more than 12 countries, including the U.S., Canada, Australia, the United Arab Emirates, and the Netherlands, and employ more than 2,400 full time employees worldwide.
Recent Developments
On May 21, 2019, the Company received TSX approval for Normal Course Issuer Bid (Share Repurchase Program) commencing on May 23, 2019 and terminating on May 22, 2020 or on such earlier date as the Company may complete its purchases thereunder or as it may otherwise determine. Under the NCIB, the Company may purchase up to the lesser of 5,449,204 common shares (such amount representing 5% of the common shares of the Company issued and outstanding as of May 10, 2019) or that number of common shares worth an aggregate of US$100 million. Under the program, the Company repurchased US$42 million worth of common shares in 2019.
On June 24, 2019, the Board of Ritchie Bros. announced its succession plan and the stepping down of its Chief Executive Officer, Ravi Saligram. Mr. Saligram led the Company and the multi year transformation effort since July 2014. Subsequently, the Board of Ritchie Bros. announced that Sharon Driscoll, Chief Financial Officer, and Karl Werner, President, International, were named interim Co-Chief Executive Officers of the Company effective October 1st, 2019 concurrent with the date of Mr. Saligram’s departure.
On December 16, 2019, the Board of Ritchie Bros. announced Ann Fandozzi would become the new Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Ms. Fandozzi was appointed CEO effective January 6, 2020. Ms. Fandozzi comes to the Company with a track record of designing and executing winning strategies and driving profitable growth, with a strong customer focus, deep experience in technology, and outstanding management capabilities that will further Ritchie Bros. strategic transformation as a multi‐channel, technology‐enabled global business.
Strategies
We operate in a large and fragmented used equipment marketplace and believe that significant growth opportunities can be captured by building on Ritchie Bros.’ established sales and operations infrastructure combined with IronPlanet’s online formats. Our wide range of sales channels and sales formats offer our customers unprecedented choice from our well-known live and online simulcast options to featured online auctions and marketplaces to private contract negotiations. We are building on our position as trusted advisors and are evolving from transactional selling to solution selling.
At the beginning of 2015, we formalized a new strategy that centered around becoming a more diversified, multi-channel company that offered a full range of asset management and disposition solutions, all on a greater scale, that would provide even more choice to customers. Our strategy focuses on two overarching strategic objectives: (i) grow share of the auction segment and (ii) penetrate the upstream market. The executable pillars of the strategy are Grow, Drive and Optimize.
Service Offerings
We offer our equipment buyer and seller customers multiple distinct, complementary, multi-channel brand solutions that address their needs. Our global customer base has a variety of transaction options, breadth of services, and the widest selection of used equipment available to them. The tables below illustrate the various channels and brand solutions available under our Auctions and Marketplaces (“A&M”) segment, as well as our other services segment.
Auctions and Marketplace
Channels
Brand Solutions
Description of Offering
Live On Site Auctions
Live unreserved on site with live simulcast online auctions
Event-based sales of used construction and heavy equipment held in the Caterpillar dealer geographies
Event-based sales of collector vehicles
Event-based sales of used energy equipment
Online Auctions and Marketplaces
Online marketplace for selling and buying used equipment
Online marketplace offering multiple price and timing options
Online marketplace for the sale of government and military assets
Online truck and trailer marketplace
Brokerage Service
Confidential, negotiated sale of large equipment
Gross Transaction Value (“GTV”)
We record Gross GTV for our A&M business, which represents total proceeds from all items sold at our auctions and online marketplaces. GTV is not a measure of financial performance, liquidity, or revenue, and is not presented in our consolidated financial statements.
4
Contract options
We offer consignors several contract options to meet their individual needs and sale objectives. Through our A&M business, options include:
We collectively refer to guarantee and inventory contracts as underwritten or “at-risk” contracts. In 2019, our underwritten business accounted for approximately 20% of our GTV, compared to 17% in 2018 and 2017.
Value-added services
We provide a wide array of value-added services to make the process of buying and selling equipment convenient for our customers. In addition to the other services listed in the table below, we also provide the following value-added services to our customers:
Our IronClad Assurance equipment condition certification provides online marketplace buyers with information on the condition of the equipment that includes, but is not limited to, providing buyers with pictures and comprehensive inspection information of key systems and components.
Other Services
Financial Service
Loan origination service that uses a brokerage model to match loan applicants with appropriate financial lending institutions
Appraisal Service
Unbiased, certified appraisal services, as well as truck and lease return inspection services
Online Listing Service
Online equipment listing service and B2B dealer portal
Ancillary Services
Repair, paint, and other make-ready services
Logistical Service
End-to-end transportation and customs clearance solution for sellers and buyers with shipping needs
Software Service
Cloud-based platform to manage end-to-end disposition
Intellectual Property
We believe our intellectual property has significant value and is an important factor in marketing our organization, services, and website, as well as differentiating us from our competitors. We own or hold the rights to use valuable intellectual property such as trademarks, service marks, domain names and tradenames. We protect our intellectual property in Canada, the U.S., and internationally through federal, provincial, state, and common law rights, including registration of certain trade mark and service marks for many of our brands, including our core brands. We also have secured patents for inventions and have registered our domain names.
5
We rely on contractual restrictions and rights to protect certain of our proprietary rights in products and services. Effective protection of our intellectual property can be expensive to maintain and may require litigation. We must protect our intellectual property rights and other proprietary rights in many jurisdictions throughout the world. In addition, we may, from time to time, be subject to intellectual property claims, including allegations of infringement, which can be costly to defend. For a discussion of the risks involved with intellectual property litigation and enforcement of our intellectual property rights, see the related information in “Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Competition
Competition Overview
The global used equipment market is highly fragmented with total annual global used equipment volumes estimated at more than $300 billion. We estimate the used equipment auction segment is $25 billion. Ritchie Bros. is the largest live auction company and claims approximately 20% market share of the live auction space with its $5.14 billion in GTV volume in 2019. We compete based on breadth, brand reputation, security, technology, and global reach of our services, as well as in the variety of contracts and methods and channels of selling equipment. In addition to the auction segment, two other major segments include private sales and brokers as well as the retail segment which includes OEM’s, OEM dealers, rental companies and large strategic accounts. We also compete with private sales – often securing new business from equipment owners who had previously tried selling their equipment privately. Given the fragmentation in the auction market as well as upstream opportunities in private sales and retail, there is significant opportunity for growth.
Competitive advantages
Our key strengths provide distinct competitive advantages and have enabled us to achieve significant and profitable growth over the long term.
Global platform
We pride ourselves on our unparalleled ability to connect buyers and sellers through our global network of 40 operational auction sites in 12 countries, including the U.S., Canada, Australia, the United Arab Emirates, and the Netherlands and via multiple online sales channels. Our online bidding technology and Ritchie Bros. website are available in 10 and 22 languages, respectively. Our global presence ensures we generate global market pricing for our equipment sellers, as we reach international buyers and equipment demand, helping to deliver strong price realization through our sales channels. This global reach provides us and our selling customers with the ability to transcend local market conditions.
Customer Relationships
Relationships are the core of Ritchie Bros. – delighting customers and treating them like friends while meeting their business needs. By offering an unprecedented choice of solutions that best suit our customers’ needs, making their lives easier in the process, we develop relationships that last across generations. We take a long-term approach with our customers and as such we position our sales force to act as trusted advisors to our customers.
Breadth of solutions
Post the acquisition of IronPlanet, we now possess the ability to meet all the buyers’ and sellers’ unique needs in a one-stop-shop manner. The event-driven live on site auction, which has been Ritchie Bros.’ core business for nearly 60 years, is now just one—albeit powerful solution—to meet our customers’ varied needs. By delivering choice, the Company can work with customers as a trusted advisor to provide them each with a tailored suite of equipment disposition solutions and asset management capabilities to best meet their needs.
While Ritchie Bros. has a full suite of solutions, most of its volumes are generated through three core solutions.
6
Data & Analytics
The Company’s deep auction history and strategic investments in technology has enabled us to develop a rich database of information which we intend to leverage to provide our customers with value-added insights, equipment pricing trends, and differentiated service offerings.
We are also deriving enterprise value from data by using it to improve operational efficiencies and augment our transactional products services. We have invested in analytics talent, data infrastructure and integration, and machine learning to provide near real-time strategic and operational insights and services to enable us to deliver on our multi-channel business objectives.
We have also invested in predictive machine learning to deliver highly scalable asset valuation predictions to enable enhanced and scalable asset valuation capabilities. Ritchie Bros. possesses one of the most complete collections of transparent transaction data in the industries we serve. As a paid service, we have recently launched a Data and Insights Module within Ritchie Bros. Asset Solutions. This allows customers to gain self-service insights into market trends, asset pricing and their sales activity on Ritchie Bros. platforms.
Our People
Our continued success is largely dependent on the strength and capabilities of our employees, and we believe that the development of a safe, engaged and inclusive workforce is critical to the achievement of our strategic goals. Along with a strong reputation among customers and the general public, Ritchie Bros. is acknowledged as a great place to work and was recently awarded one of British Columbia’s Top Employers in 2018.
Development and Engagement
Ritchie Bros. recognizes that our employees are our greatest assets. Employee development is not just important to the Company but also for the professional and personal growth of our employees. We foster our employees’ development through a wide range of development programs, instructional services and learning products. Ritchie Bros. is creating a learning culture where managers are responsible for providing an environment that supports the growth and development needs of their employees, and where employees are motivated to establish development plans and look for opportunities to apply their learning on the job.
The Company’s employees and officers conduct the Company’s business on a day-to-day basis in a manner that promotes and protects our reputation and the trust that our customers and investors have in the Ritchie Bros. brand. To further promote and instill strong operating practices and foster appropriate behaviours and decision making, the Company promotes and mandates the following:
Health & Safety
Our Company’s 2,400+ employees have an unreserved commitment to safety and is committed to send everyone home, every day, the way they came to work. We support this commitment through the use of a Safety Steering Team made up of a cross section of functions within the organization, the use of Continuous Improvement Teams made up of Operations, Sales and Administration personnel, an active Risk Identification process at the field level and open communications around safety both on and off the job.
The Safety Steering Team identifies continuous improvement activities using a quarterly review of all incidents across the organization to identify common issues that require attention. In the past three years, we have improved not only our TRIR (Total Recordable Incident Rate) and severity rating but we have seen an overall reduction in total incidents throughout the organization supporting our unreserved commitment to safety and to send everyone home, every day, the way they came to work.
Diversity & Inclusion
The Company also supports an inclusive workplace culture and is committed to the education, recruitment, development and advancement of diverse team members worldwide. Women’s LINK, a global initiative to support women within our company was launched in late 2018 and is focused on strengthening our core value of being a diverse and inclusive global organization as we look to drive innovation through diversity of thought, gender, nationality and ethnicity. LINK is an Employee Resource Group (ERG) to serve as a resource for the women at Ritchie Bros. and the organization itself. Although the ERG’s primary goal is to support Ritchie Bros. women, the broader mandate is to make the resources and services available to all employees. Ritchie Bros. is a signatory to the Minerva Pledge on gender diversity.
7
Promoting Ethical Conduct
Our success and reputation is founded upon our commitment to honesty, integrity, and doing what is right. We depend on our employees and officers to conduct the Company’s business on a day-to-day basis in a manner that promotes and protects our reputation and the trust that our customers and investor have in the Ritchie Bros. brand. Our Code of Conduct and Ethics helps our employees understand what we mean by ethical behavior and to exemplify our core values. Employees are required to complete annual scenario-based training on our Code to reinforce awareness and understanding of how to put these principles into practice each day.
Ethics Hotline
We maintain a confidential and anonymous independent third-party telephone and web access hotline for anyone to submit concerns regarding potential code violations or other ethics-related matters without fear of repercussions. All reported matters are investigated fully and reported to the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
The Role of Technology
The role of technology in our business continues to evolve and become more meaningful as more buyers adopt mobile and online channels to transact their business with us. We have been on a pathway to leverage digital and technology capabilities to improve the consumer auction and leverage technology as a competitive differentiator.
The acquisition of IronPlanet was an inflection point in our business and was a step change in this direction as it positioned us as a technology-enabled asset disposition company. The combination of IronPlanet’s technology and our existing assets results in tools and capabilities that provide our customers, both buyers and sellers, with more efficient and richer experiences and value-added differentiators creating deeper brand loyalty.
We remain focused on technology enablement to transform the way we compete, the way we work and the way we leverage technology to drive future growth. Our technology capabilities are delivering choice for our customers in the form of multiple channels for buyers and sellers, meeting customer’s asset management needs through information-rich software solutions and leveraging our rich data repository to drive strong sales and improved pricing decisions. We are also providing our customers with leading tools and capabilities to deliver full life-cycle asset management for used equipment.
Data Privacy and Security
As the role of technology and data in our business expands, so too does the importance of cybersecurity. The Company takes protecting our customers, employees, brand, systems and data very seriously. The Company actively monitors and manages security risks and looks to mitigate them through enterprise-wide programs, employee training and vulnerability assessments. We have made – and continue to make – investments in dedicated information security resources, leadership and technology. We continue to strengthen and enhance our program and controls around people, process and technology and apply risk-based strategies to enhance detection, protection and response efforts.
Our commitment to data security and privacy is demonstrated in the Company’s overall approach to governance. We are incorporating security and privacy by design and increasing awareness around the company with support from management and our board, which include:
8
Seasonality
Our GTV and associated A&M segment revenues are affected by the seasonal nature of our business. GTV and A&M segment revenues tend to increase during the second and fourth calendar quarters, during which time we generally conduct more business than in the first and third calendar quarters. Given the operating leverage inherent in our business model, the second and fourth quarter also tend to produce higher operating margins, given the higher volume and revenue generated in those quarters.
Revenue Mix Fluctuations
Our revenue is comprised of service revenues and revenue from inventory sold. Service revenues from A&M segment activities include commissions earned at our live auctions, online marketplaces, and private brokerage services, and various auction-related fees, including listing and buyer transaction fees. We also recognize revenues from our Other Services activities as service revenues. Revenue from inventory sales is recognized as part of our A&M activities, and relates to revenues earned through our inventory contracts.
Revenue from inventory sales can fluctuate significantly, as it changes based on whether our customers sell using a straight or guarantee commission contract, or an inventory contract at time of selling. Straight or guarantee commission contracts will result in the commission being recognized as service revenues, while inventory contracts will result in the gross transaction value of the equipment sold being recorded as revenue from inventory sales with the related cost recognized in cost of inventory sold. As a result, a change in the revenue mix between service revenues and revenue from inventory sales can have a significant impact on revenue growth percentages.
Governmental Regulations and Environmental Laws
Our operations are subject to a variety of federal, provincial, state and local laws, rules, and regulations throughout the world. We believe that we are compliant in all material respects with those laws, rules, and regulations that affect our business, and that such compliance does not impose a material impediment on our ability to conduct our business.
We believe that, among other things, laws, rules, and regulations related to the following list of items affect our business:
Available Information
The information contained on or accessible through our website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We file required reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, Form 8-K, proxy materials and other filings required under the Exchange Act. The SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
We maintain a website at www.rbauction.com and copies of our reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, proxy materials and other filings required under the Exchange Act, are available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such reports with, or furnish those reports to, the SEC. We have an investor website at www.investor.ritchiebros.com. None of the information on our websites is incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K by this or any other reference.
9
Also available for investors on our website in the Corporate Governance section for investors are the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our directors, officers and employees (“Code of Conduct”), Board Mandate, Audit Committee Charter, Nominating and Corporate Governance Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Diversity Policy, Shareholder Engagement Policy, Articles and Bylaws, Majority Voting Policy and Board Chair Role and Description.
Additional information related to Ritchie Bros. is also available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
As a Canada Business Corporations Act (“CBCA”) company with our principal place of business in Canada, U.S. civil liabilities may not be enforceable against us. Please see “Item 1A. Risk Factors—U.S. civil liabilities may not be enforceable against us, our directors, or our officers,” which is incorporated into this Item 1 by this reference.
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, you should carefully consider each of the risks described below before purchasing our common shares. The risk factors set forth below are not the only risks that may affect our business. Our business could also be affected by additional risks not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could materially suffer. As a result, the trading price of our common shares could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Information in this section may be considered “forward-looking statements.” See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” for a discussion of certain qualifications regarding such statements.
Damage to our reputation could harm our business.
One of our founding principles is that we operate a fair and transparent business, and consistently act with integrity. Maintaining a positive reputation is key to our ability to attract and maintain customers, investors and employees. Damage to our reputation could cause significant harm to our business. Harm to our reputation could arise in a number of ways, including, but not limited to, employee conduct which is not aligned with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (and associated Company policies around behavioural expectations) or our Company’s core values, safety incidents, failure to maintain customer service standards, loss of trust in the fairness of our sales processes, and other technology or compliance failures.
We may not realize the anticipated benefits of, and synergies from, the Acquisition.
Business acquisitions involve the integration of new businesses that have previously operated independently from us. The integration of our operations with those of IronPlanet is expected to result in financial and operational benefits, as well as operating synergies. There can be no assurance, however, regarding when or the extent to which we will be able to realize these and other benefits. Integration may also be difficult, unpredictable, and subject to delay because of possible company culture conflicts and different opinions on future business development.
Although we have moved beyond the most complex stage of our integration, we may not realize the full benefits that we anticipate. If we achieve the expected benefits, they may not be achieved within the anticipated time frame. Also, the benefits from the Acquisition may be offset by costs incurred in integrating Ritchie Bros. and IronPlanet, increases in other expenses, operating losses or problems in the business unrelated to the Acquisition. As a result, there can be no assurance that such synergies or other benefits will be achieved.
We have incurred substantial indebtedness in connection with the Acquisition, and the degree to which we are leveraged may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We have incurred substantial indebtedness in connection with the Acquisition. As at December 31, 2019, we have $650.2 million of total debt outstanding, consisting of $159.5 million under a five-year credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of lenders entered into on October 27, 2016, and $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.375% senior unsecured notes issued December 21, 2016 (the “Notes”), partially reduced by $9.9 million of unamortized debt issue costs, as well as $0.6 million under our foreign credit facilities. There is $480.5 million of availability under the Credit Agreement.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, including the debt incurred pursuant to the Acquisition as well as any future debt that we may incur, will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future from operations, financings or asset sales. Our ability to generate cash is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. We may not generate sufficient funds to service our debt and meet our business needs, such as funding working capital or the expansion of our operations. If we are not able to repay or refinance our debt as it becomes due, we may be forced to take certain actions, including reducing spending on marketing, advertising and new product innovation, reducing future financing for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes, selling
assets or dedicating an unsustainable level of our cash flow from operations to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness. In addition, our ability to withstand competitive pressures and to react to changes in our industry, including both the live and online auction industry, could be impaired.
The lenders who hold our debt could also accelerate amounts due in the event that we default, which could potentially trigger a default or acceleration of the maturity of our other debt.
In addition, our substantial leverage could put us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that are less leveraged. These competitors could have greater financial flexibility to pursue strategic acquisitions and secure additional financing for their operations. Our substantial leverage could also impede our ability to withstand downturns in our industry or the economy in general.
We may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of the Credit Agreement and the indenture governing the Notes will limit, but not prohibit, us from incurring additional indebtedness. If we incur any additional indebtedness that has the same priority as the Notes and the guarantees thereof, the holders of that indebtedness will be entitled to share rateably with the holders of the Notes and the guarantees thereof in any proceeds distributed in connection with any insolvency, liquidation, reorganization, dissolution or other winding-up of us.
Subject to restrictions in the Credit Agreement and the indenture governing the Notes, we also will have the ability to incur additional secured indebtedness that would be effectively senior to the Notes offered hereby, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such obligations. If new indebtedness is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.
Our debt instruments have restrictive covenants that could limit our financial flexibility.
The terms of the Credit Agreement, as well as the indenture governing the Notes, contain financial and other restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in activities that may be in our long-term best interests. Our ability to borrow under our Credit Agreement is subject to compliance with a consolidated leverage ratio covenant and a consolidated interest coverage ratio covenant.
The Credit Agreement includes other restrictions that limit our ability in certain circumstances to: incur indebtedness; grant liens; engage in mergers, consolidations and liquidations; make asset dispositions, restricted payments and investments; enter into transactions with affiliates; and amend, modify or prepay certain indebtedness. The indenture governing the Notes contains covenants that limit our ability in certain circumstances to:
Our failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of substantially all of our funded debt. We do not have sufficient working capital to satisfy our debt obligations in the event of an acceleration of all or a significant portion of our outstanding indebtedness.
Uncertainty regarding LIBOR may adversely impact our indebtedness under our credit and loan facilities.
On July 27, 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021. It is unclear if, at that time, LIBOR will cease to exist or if new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. It is impossible to predict whether and to what extent banks will continue to provide LIBOR submissions to the administrator of LIBOR or whether any additional reforms to LIBOR may be enacted in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. Similarly, it is impossible to predict what rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR. Potential changes, or uncertainty related to such potential changes, may adversely affect the cost of our borrowings. If LIBOR ceases to exist, the method and rate used to calculate our variable-rate debt in the future may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher than, lower than, or that do not otherwise correlate over time with the interest rates and/or payments that would have been made on our obligations if LIBOR was available in its current form. The potential effect of the phase-out or replacement of LIBOR on our financial condition and results of operations cannot yet be determined.
11
Competition could result in reductions in our future revenues and profitability.
The global used equipment market, including the auction segment of that market, is highly fragmented. We compete for potential purchasers and sellers of equipment with other auction companies and with non-auction competitors such as equipment manufacturers, distributors and dealers, equipment rental companies, and other online marketplaces. When sourcing equipment to sell at our auctions or other marketplaces, we compete with other on site and online auction companies, OEM and independent dealers, equipment brokers, other third parties, and equipment owners that have traditionally disposed of equipment in private sales.
Some of our competitors have significantly greater financial and marketing resources and name recognition than we do. New competitors with greater financial and other resources and/or different business models/strategies may enter the equipment auction market in the future. Additionally, existing or future competitors may succeed in entering and establishing successful operations in new geographic markets prior to our entry into those markets. They may also compete against us through internet-based services and other combined service offerings.
If commission rates decline, or if our strategy to compete against our many competitors is not effective, our revenues, market share, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely impacted. We may be susceptible to loss of business if competing selling models become more appealing to customers. If our selling model becomes undesirable or we are not successful in adding services complementary to our existing selling model and business, we may not be successful increasing market penetration over the long-term, which could prevent us from achieving our long-term earnings growth targets.
Our relationships with key long-term customers may be materially diminished or terminated.
We have long-standing and/or strategic relationships with a number of our customers and business partners, many of whom could unilaterally terminate their relationship with us or materially reduce the amount of business they conduct with us at any time. Market competition, business requirements and financial conditions could adversely affect our ability to continue or expand our relationships with our customers and business partners. There is no guarantee that we will be able to retain or renew existing agreements, or maintain relationships with any of our customers or business partners, on acceptable terms or at all. The loss of one or more of our major customers or business partners could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Decreases in the supply of, demand for, or market values of used equipment, could harm our business.
Our revenues could decrease if there was significant erosion in the supply of, demand for, or market values of used equipment, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We have no control over any of the factors that affect the supply of, and demand for, used equipment, and the circumstances that cause market values for equipment to fluctuate — including, among other things, economic uncertainty, global geopolitical climate, disruptions to credit and financial markets, lower commodity prices, and our customers’ restricted access to capital — are beyond our control. Recent economic conditions have caused fluctuations in the supply, mix and market values of used equipment available for sale, which has a direct impact on our revenues.
In addition, price competition and the availability of equipment directly affect the supply of, demand for, and market value of used equipment. Climate change initiatives, including significant changes to engine emission standards applicable to equipment, may also adversely affect the supply of, demand for our market values of equipment.
We may incur losses as a result of our guarantee and inventory contracts and advances to consignors.
Our most common type of auction contract is a straight commission contract, under which we earn a pre-negotiated, fixed commission rate on the gross sales price of the consigned equipment at auction. We use straight commission contracts when we act as agent for consignors. In recent years, a majority of our annual business has been conducted on a straight commission basis. In certain other situations, we will enter into underwritten transactions and either offer to:
We determine the level of guaranteed proceeds or inventory purchase price based on appraisals performed on equipment by our internal personnel. Inaccurate appraisals could result in guarantees or inventory values that exceed the realizable auction proceeds. In addition, a change in market values could also result in guarantee or inventory values exceeding the realizable auction proceeds. If auction proceeds are less than the guaranteed amount, our commission will be reduced, and we could potentially incur a loss, and, if auction proceeds are less than the purchase price we paid for equipment that we take into inventory temporarily, we will incur a loss. Because a majority of our auctions are unreserved, there is no way for us to protect against these types of losses by bidding on or acquiring any of the items at such auctions. In addition, we do not hold inventory indefinitely waiting for market conditions to improve. If our exposure to underwritten contracts increases, this risk would be compounded.
12
Occasionally, we advance to consignors a portion of the estimated auction proceeds prior to the auction. We generally make these advances only after taking possession of the assets to be auctioned and upon receipt of a security interest in the assets to secure the obligation. If we were unable to auction the assets or if auction proceeds were less than amounts advanced, we could incur a loss.
The availability and performance of our technology infrastructure, including our websites, is critical to our business.
The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability of our websites, enterprise resource planning system, processing systems and network infrastructure are important to our reputation and our business. Our systems may experience service interruptions or degradation because of hardware or software defects or malfunctions, computer denial of service, cyber events, human error and natural events beyond our control. Some of our systems are not fully redundant, and our recovery planning may not be sufficient for all possible disruptions.
Further, we will need to continue to expand, consolidate, and upgrade our technology, transaction processing systems and network infrastructure both to meet increased usage of our online bidding service and other new services and solutions being offered to our customers, to implement new features and functions and as a result of the Acquisition. Our business and results of operations could be harmed if we were unable to expand and upgrade in a timely manner our systems and infrastructure to accommodate any increases in the use of our internet services, or if we were to lose access to or the functionality of our internet systems for any reason, especially if such loss of service prevented internet bidders from effectively participating in one of our auctions. Frequent, persistent or ill-timed interruptions to our internet services could cause current or potential customers to believe that our systems are unreliable, which could lead to the loss of customers and harm our reputation.
We use both internally developed and licensed systems for transaction processing and accounting, including billings and collections processing. We continually upgrade and improve these systems to accommodate growth in our business. If we are unsuccessful in continuing to upgrade our technology, transaction processing systems or network infrastructure to accommodate increased transaction volumes, it could harm our operations and interfere with our ability to expand our business.
We may not realize the anticipated benefits of, and synergies from, a systems transformation project that the Company is currently developing and implementing.
We are in the process of developing and implementing our new multichannel administration and reporting system ("MARS") in order to retire or integrate legacy technologies used across our sales platforms. This initiative requires the execution of complex projects involving significant systems and operational changes, which place considerable demands on our management, our employees, our information and other systems. Our ability to successfully implement and realize the benefits from these projects is dependent on management’s ability to manage these projects effectively and implement and operate them successfully, without adversely affecting our existing systems, and on our employees’ ability to effect the required operational changes. If we fail to implement these projects effectively, including aligning them with our sales operations, we experience significant delay or cost overruns or the necessary overall operational changes are not effected properly, we may not realize the return on our investments that we anticipate, we may adversely affect the operation of other systems, and our business, financial position, operating results, and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
Consumer behavior is rapidly changing, and if we are unable to successfully adapt to consumer preferences and develop and maintain a relevant and reliable inventory management and multichannel disposition experience for our customers, our financial performance and brand image could be adversely affected.
Our business continues to evolve into a one-stop inventory management and multichannel disposition company where customers can buy, sell, or list equipment, when, how, and where they choose- both onsite and online, and manage their existing fleets and/or inventory using our online inventory management tools. As a result of this evolution, increasingly we interact with our customers across a variety of different channels, including live auction, online, through mobile technologies, including the Ritchie Bros. mobile app, social media, and inventory management systems. Our customers are increasingly using tablets and mobile phones to make purchases online and to get detailed equipment information for assets that they own or are interested in purchasing. Our customers also engage with us online, including through social media, by providing feedback and public commentary about all aspects of our business. Consumer shopping patterns are rapidly changing and our success depends on our ability to anticipate and implement innovations in customer experience and logistics in order to appeal to customers who increasingly rely on multiple channels to meet their equipment management and disposition needs. If for any reason we are unable to implement our inventory management and multichannel initiatives, provide a convenient and consistent experience for our customers across all channels, or provide our customers the services they want, when and where they want them at a compelling value proposition, then our financial performance and brand image could be adversely affected.
13
A deterioration of general macroeconomic conditions could materially and adversely affect our business.
Our performance is subject to macroeconomic conditions and their impact on customer spending. Adverse macroeconomic conditions typically result in a general tightening in credit markets, lower levels of liquidity, increased default and bankruptcy rates, and depressed levels of activity and investment.
Challenging macroeconomic conditions may have a negative impact on the operations, financial condition and liquidity of many customers and, as a result, may negatively impact the volume of equipment listed for sale and the prices of equipment sold in our marketplace, thereby having a negative impact on our revenue and ability to grow our business. If sellers choose not to sell their assets as a result of adverse economic conditions, buyers are unable to purchase equipment based on their inability to obtain sufficient financing or are unwilling to do so given the market climate, or if customers are in general financial distress, our operations may be negatively affected and revenue from our marketplace may decrease.
Our ability to provide a high-quality customer experience may depend on third parties and external factors over which we may have little or no control.
Our ability to provide a high quality and efficient customer experience is also dependent on external factors over which we may have little or no control, including, without limitation, the reliability and performance of the equipment sold in our marketplaces and the performance of third-party carriers who transport purchased equipment on behalf of buyers. If our customers are dissatisfied with the accuracy of our appraisals and inspections, the quality of the business insights provided by our other value-added services, or do not receive the equipment they purchased in a timely manner or in the condition that they expect, customers may stop using us to purchase equipment. Failure to provide customers with high quality and efficient customer experiences could substantially harm our reputation and adversely impact our efforts to develop customer and industry trust in our brands.
Government regulation of the Internet and e-commerce is evolving, and unfavorable changes in this or other regulations could substantially harm our business and results of operations.
We are subject to general business regulations and laws as well as certain federal, provincial, state and local laws, rules and regulations, including those governing the internet and e-commerce. Existing and future laws and regulations may impede the growth of the internet, e-commerce or other services, and increase the cost of doing business, including providing online auction services. These regulations and laws may cover taxation, tariffs, user privacy, data protection, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, electronic contracts, and other communications, consumer protection, broadband residential Internet access and the characteristics and quality of services. It is not clear how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, sales, use and other taxes, libel, and personal privacy apply to the Internet and e-commerce. Changes to regulations and unfavorable resolution of these issues may harm our business and results of operations.
We have two vendor contracts with the U.S. Government’s Defense Logistics Agency (“DLA”) as part of our GovPlanet business unit pursuant to which we acquire a significant amount of inventory. If we are unable to sell the purchased inventory our financial results would be adversely impacted. Also, if our relationship with the DLA is disrupted for any reason, our GovPlanet business unit would be adversely impacted.
We have two vendor contracts with the DLA pursuant to which we acquire, manage and resell certain assets of the DLA. One of the DLA contracts obliges the Company to purchase non-rolling stock assets in an amount and of a type over which the Company has limited ability to control. In many cases, the type of assets purchased are not what we typically sell through any of our other channels. Although the prices paid by the Company for the non-rolling stock inventory are a fraction of the original acquisition value, we may not have the ability to attract buyers for those assets and the Company may be unable to sell those assets on a timely basis or at all. This would have an adverse affect on the Company’s financial results. In addition, if our relationship with the DLA is impaired, we are not awarded new DLA vendor contracts when our current contracts expire, the DLA vendor contract is terminated or the supply of inventory under such contracts is significantly decreased, our GovPlanet business unit would experience a decrease in revenue and GTV.
Our business is subject to risks relating to our ability to safeguard our information systems, including the cyber-security and privacy of our customers’ , suppliers', counterparties' and employees' confidential information.
We rely on information technology to manage our business, including maintaining proprietary databases containing sensitive and confidential information about our customers, suppliers, counterparties and employees (which may include personal information and credit information). An increasing number of websites have disclosed cyber breaches of their security, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly targeted attacks on portions of their websites or infrastructure. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems, change frequently, we may not be able to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Unauthorized parties may also attempt to gain access to our systems or facilities through various means, including hacking into our systems or facilities, fraud, trickery or other means of deceiving our employees or contractors. A party that is able to circumvent our security measures
14
could misappropriate our or our customers’ confidential information, cause interruption to our operations, damage our computing infrastructure or otherwise damage our reputation. Although we maintain information security measures, there can be no assurance that we will be immune from these security risks, and any breach of our information security may have a material adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
Under credit card payment rules and our contracts with credit card processors, if there is a breach of payment card information that we collect to process transactions, we could be liable to the payment card issuing banks for their cost of issuing new cards and related expenses. We may also be held liable for certain fraudulent credit card transactions and other payment disputes with customers. If we were unable to accept payment cards, our results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.
Security breaches could damage our reputation, cause a loss of confidence in the security of our services and expose us to a risk of loss or litigation and possible liability for damages. We may be required to make significant expenditures to protect against security breaches or to alleviate problems caused by any breaches. These issues are likely to become costlier as we expand. Our insurance policies may not be adequate to reimburse us for losses caused by security breaches, and we may not be able to fully collect, if at all, under these insurance policies.
Our future expenses may increase significantly and our operations and ability to expand may be limited as a result of environmental and other regulations.
A variety of federal, provincial, state and local laws, rules and regulations throughout the world, including local tax and accounting rules, apply to our business. These relate to, among other things, the auction business, imports and exports of equipment, property ownership laws, licensing, worker safety, privacy of customer information, land use and the use, storage, discharge and disposal of environmentally sensitive materials. Complying with revisions to laws, rules and regulations could result in an increase in expenses and a deterioration of our financial performance. Failure to comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations could result in substantial liability to us, suspension or cessation of some or all of our operations, restrictions on our ability to expand at present locations or into new locations, requirements for the acquisition of additional equipment or other significant expenses or restrictions.
The development or expansion of auction sites depends upon receipt of required licenses, permits and other governmental authorizations. Our inability to obtain these required items could harm our business. Additionally, changes or concessions required by regulatory authorities could result in significant delays in, or prevent completion of, such development or expansion.
Under some environmental laws, an owner or lessee of, or other person involved in, real estate may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances located on or in, or emanating from, the real estate, and related costs of investigation and property damage. These laws often impose liability without regard to whether the owner, lessee or other person knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances.
Environmental contamination may exist at our owned or leased auction sites, or at other sites on which we may conduct auctions, or properties that we may be selling by auction, from prior activities at these locations or from neighboring properties.
In addition, auction sites that we acquire or lease in the future may be contaminated, and future use of or conditions on any of our properties or sites could result in contamination. The costs related to claims arising from environmental contamination of any of these properties could harm our financial condition and results of operations.
There are restrictions in the U.S., Canada and Europe and other jurisdictions in which we do business that may affect the ability of equipment owners to transport certain equipment between specified jurisdictions or the saleability of older equipment. One example of these restrictions is environmental certification requirements in the U.S., which prevent non-certified equipment from entering into commerce in the U.S. In addition, engine emission standards in some jurisdictions limit the operation of certain trucks and equipment in those markets.
These restrictions, or changes to environmental laws, including laws in response to climate change, could inhibit materially the ability of customers to ship equipment to or from our auction sites, reducing our GTV and harming our business, financial condition and results of operations.
International bidders and consignors could be deterred from participating in our auctions if governmental bodies impose additional export or import regulations or additional duties, taxes or other charges on exports or imports. Reduced participation by international bidders and consignors could reduce GTV and harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
15
Losing the services of one or more key personnel or the failure to attract, train and retain personnel could materially affect our business.
Our future success largely depends on our ability to attract, develop and retain skilled employees in all areas of our business, as well as to design an appropriate organization structure and plan effectively for succession. Although we actively manage our human resource risks, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in our efforts. If we fail to attract, develop and retain skilled employees in all areas of our business, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected, and we may not achieve our growth or performance objectives.
The growth and performance of our business depends to a significant extent on the efforts and abilities of our employees. Many of our key employees have extensive experience with our business. These employees have knowledge and an understanding of our company and industry that cannot be readily duplicated. The loss of any key personnel, or the inability to replace any lost personnel with equally trained personnel, could impair our ability to execute our business plan and growth strategy, cause us to lose customers and reduce our revenues. In addition, the success of our strategic initiatives to expand our business to complimentary service offerings will require new competencies in many positions, and our management and employees will have to adapt and learn new skills and capabilities. To the extent they are unable or unwilling to make these transformational changes, we may be unable to realize the full benefits of our strategic initiatives. We do not maintain key person insurance on the lives of any of our executive officers or other key personnel. As a result, we would have no way to cover the financial loss if we were to lose the services of such employees. This uncertainty may adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key employees.
If any of our key personnel were to join a competitor or form a competing company, existing and potential customers could choose to form business relationships with that competitor instead of us. There can be no assurance that confidentiality, non-solicitation, non-competition or similar agreements signed by our former directors, officers, or employees will be effective in preventing a loss of business.
Failure to maintain safe sites could materially affect our business and reputation.
Our employees and customers are often in close proximity with mechanized equipment, moving vehicles and chemical and other industrial substances. Our auction sites and warehouses are, therefore, potentially dangerous places and involve the risk of accidents, environmental incidents and other incidents which may expose us to investigations and litigation or could negatively affect the perception of customer and employee safety, health and security. Even in the absence of any incidents, unsafe site conditions could lead to employee turnover or harm our reputation generally, each of which would affect our financial performance. While safety is a primary focus of our business and is critical to our reputation and performance, our failure to implement safety procedures or implement ineffective safety procedures, would increase this risk and our operations and results from operations may be adversely impacted.
Income and commodity tax amounts, including tax expense, may be materially different than expected and there is a trend by global tax collection authorities towards the adoption of more aggressive laws, regulations, interpretations and audit practices.
Our global operations are subject to tax interpretations, regulations, and legislation in the numerous jurisdictions in which we operate, all of which are subject to continual change.
We accrue and pay income taxes and have significant income tax assets, liabilities, and expense that are estimates based primarily on the application of those interpretations, regulations and legislation, and the amount and timing of future taxable income as well as our use of applicable accounting principles. Accordingly, we cannot be certain that our estimates and reserves are sufficient. The timing concerning the monetization of deferred income tax amounts is uncertain, as they are dependent on our future earnings and other events. Our deferred income tax amounts are valued based upon substantively enacted income tax rates in effect at the time, which can be changed by governments in the future.
The audit and review activities of tax authorities affect the ultimate determination of the actual amounts of commodity taxes payable or receivable, income taxes payable or receivable, deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and income tax expense.
There is no assurance that taxes will be payable as anticipated or that the amount or timing of receipt or use of the tax-related assets will be as currently expected. Our experience indicates that taxation authorities are increasing the frequency and depth of audits and reviews. Future tax authority determinations, including changes to tax interpretations, regulations, legislation or jurisprudence, could have a material impact to our financial position. The fact that we operate internationally increases our exposure in this regard given the multiple forms of taxation imposed upon us.
16
Further and more generally, there has been increased political, media and tax authority focus on taxation in recent years; the intent of which appears to be to enhance transparency and address perceived tax avoidance. As such, in addition to tax risk from a financial perspective, our activities may expose us to reputational tax risk.
The effects of new regulations and interpretations of the enacted U.S. tax legislation have not yet been fully analyzed and could be materially different from our current estimates.
On December 22, 2017, U.S. tax legislation known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA, was signed into law, significantly reforming the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. The TCJA, among other things, includes changes to U.S. federal tax rates, imposes significant additional limitations on the deductibility of interest, allows for the expensing of capital expenditures, puts into effect the migration from a “worldwide” system of taxation to a territorial system and modifies or repeals many business deductions and credits. The TCJA added a minimum tax on a U.S. corporation’s taxable income after adding back certain deductible payments to non-U.S. affiliates. In addition, the TCJA disallows deductions for interest and royalty payments from U.S. companies to non-U.S. affiliates that are hybrid payments or made to hybrid entities. We continue to examine the impact the TCJA may have on our business. The overall impact of the TCJA remains uncertain. There is no assurance that the final determination of our income tax liability will not be materially different than what is reflected in our income tax provisions and accruals. It is possible that the application of these new rules may have a material and adverse impact on our operating results, cash flows and financial condition.
Our substantial international operations expose us to foreign exchange rate fluctuations that could harm our results of operations.
We conduct business in many countries around the world and intend to continue to expand our presence in international markets, including emerging markets. Fluctuating currency exchange rates may negatively affect our business in international markets and our related results of operations.
Although we report our financial results in U.S. dollars, a significant portion of our revenues and expenses are generated outside the U.S., primarily in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. In particular, a significant portion of our revenues are earned, and expenses incurred, in the Canadian dollar and the Euro. As a result, our financial results are impacted by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We do not currently engage in foreign currency hedging arrangements, and, consequently, foreign currency fluctuations may adversely affect our results of operations.
The results of operations of our foreign subsidiaries are translated from local currency into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes. If the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign currency denominated revenues or expenses will result in increased U.S. dollar denominated revenues and expenses. Similarly, if the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, particularly the Canadian dollar and the Euro, our translation of foreign currency denominated revenues or expenses will result in lower U.S. dollar denominated revenues and expenses.
In addition, currency exchange rate fluctuations between the different countries in which we conduct our operations impact the purchasing power of buyers, the motivation of consignors, asset values and asset flows between various countries, including those in which we do not have operations. These factors and other global economic conditions may harm our business and our results of operations.
Our business is subject to the risks of operating internationally.
We operate in many international jurisdictions. There are risks inherent in doing business internationally, including, but not limited to:
17
If we violate the complex foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that apply to our international operations, we may face fines, criminal actions or sanctions, prohibitions on the conduct of our business and damage to our reputation. These risks inherent in our international operations increase our costs of doing business internationally and may result in a material adverse effect on our operations or profitability.
Our business operations may be subject to a number of federal and local laws, rules and regulations including export control regulations.
Our business operations may be subject to a number of federal and local laws, rules and regulations, including the Export Administration Regulations, or EAR, maintained by the U.S. Department of Commerce, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, or ITAR, maintained by the U.S. Department of State, economic sanctions regulations maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, or OFAC, and similar regulations in Canada and the European Union (“EU”). We have implemented procedures regarding compliance with these laws, including monitoring, on an automatic and manual basis, the potential sellers and buyers in our marketplace and restricting business from certain countries. We can offer no assurances that these procedures will always be effective.
We have implemented certain processes and procedures to prevent sellers and buyers that are located in a prohibited jurisdiction or are prohibited persons from participating in our marketplaces. Such processes and procedures are designed so that our business is in compliance with OFAC-administered sanctions regulations and other applicable sanction regulations, including those in Canada and the EU.
If we were to violate applicable export control or sanctions regulations, we could be subject to administrative or criminal penalties which, in certain circumstances, could be material. We could be subject to damages, financial penalties, denial of export privileges, incarceration of our employees, other restrictions on our operations, and reputational harm. Further, any action on the part of the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of Commerce, OFAC or other applicable regulator against the company or any of our employees for potential violations of these laws could have a negative impact on our reputation and business, which might decrease stockholder value.
Failure to comply with anti-bribery, anti-corruption, and anti-money laundering laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, or the FCPA, the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, or the CFPOA, and similar laws associated with our activities outside of the U.S. could subject us to penalties and other adverse consequences.
We are subject to the FCPA, the CFPOA, the U.S. domestic bribery statute contained in 18 U.S.C. §201, the U.S. Travel Act, the USA PATRIOT Act, the United Kingdom Bribery Act of 2010, or the U.K. Bribery Act, and possibly other anti-corruption, anti-bribery and anti-money laundering laws in countries in which we conduct activities or facilitate the buying and selling of equipment. We face significant risks if we fail to comply with the FCPA, the CFPOA and other anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws that prohibit companies and their employees and third-party intermediaries from authorizing, offering or providing, directly or indirectly, improper payments or benefits to foreign government officials, political parties or candidates, employees of public international organizations, and private-sector recipients for the corrupt purpose of obtaining or retaining business, directing business to any person, or securing any advantage. In many foreign countries, particularly in countries with developing economies, it may be a local custom that businesses engage in practices that are prohibited by the FCPA, the CFPOA or other applicable laws and regulations. In addition, we leverage various third parties to sell our solutions and conduct our business abroad. We, our channel partners, and our other third-party intermediaries may have direct or indirect interactions with officials and employees of government agencies or state-owned or affiliated entities. We may be held liable for the corrupt or other illegal activities of these third-party intermediaries, our employees, representatives, contractors, partners, and agents, even if we do not explicitly authorize such activities. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and other corporate policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, which often carry substantial penalties.
Any violation of the FCPA, other applicable anti-bribery, anti-corruption laws, and anti-money laundering laws could result in whistleblower complaints, adverse media coverage, investigations, loss of export privileges, severe criminal or civil sanctions and, in the case of the FCPA, suspension or debarment from U.S. government contracts, which could have a material and adverse effect on our reputation, business, operating results and prospects. In addition, responding to any enforcement action may result in a materially significant diversion of management’s attention and resources and significant defense costs and other professional fees.
18
We are pursuing a long-term growth strategy that may include acquisitions and developing and enhancing an appropriate sales strategy, which requires upfront investment with no guarantee of long-term returns.
We continue to pursue a long-term growth strategy, including developing and enhancing an appropriate sales strategy, that contemplates upfront investments, including (i) investments in emerging markets that may not generate profitable growth in the near term, (ii) adding new business and information solutions, and (iii) developing our people. Planning for future growth requires investments to be made now in anticipation of growth that may not materialize, and if our strategies do not successfully address the needs of current and potential customers, we may not be successful in maintaining or growing our GTV and our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely impacted. We may also not be able to improve our systems and controls as a result of increased costs, technological challenges, or lack of qualified employees. A large component of our selling, general and administrative expenses is considered fixed costs that we will incur regardless of any GTV growth. There can be no assurances that our GTV and revenues will be maintained or grow at a more rapid rate than our fixed costs.
Part of our long-term growth strategy includes growth through acquisitions, such as the Acquisition, which poses a number of risks. We may not be successful in identifying appropriate acquisition candidates, consummating acquisitions on satisfactory terms or integrating any newly acquired or expanded business with our current operations. Additionally, significant costs may be incurred in connection with any acquisition and our integration of such businesses with our business, including legal, accounting, financial advisory and other costs. We may also not realize the anticipated benefits of, and synergies from, such acquisition. We cannot guarantee that any future business acquisitions will be pursued, that any acquisitions that are pursued will be consummated, or that we will achieve the anticipated benefits of completed acquisitions.
We are regularly subject to general litigation and other claims, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We are subject to general litigation and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of our business. The outcome and impact of such litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, but regardless of the outcome, these proceedings can have an adverse impact on us because of legal costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. While the results of these claims have not historically had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, we may not be able to defend ourselves adequately against these claims in the future, and these proceedings may have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In addition to other legal proceedings, we may also be subject to intellectual property claims, which are extremely costly to defend, could require us to pay significant damages, and could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future. Companies in the Internet and technology industries are frequently subject to litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights.
We periodically receive notices that claim we have infringed, misappropriated, or misused other parties’ intellectual property rights. To the extent we gain greater public recognition, we may face a higher risk of being the subject of intellectual property claims.
Third-party intellectual property rights may cover significant aspects of our technologies or business methods or block us from expanding our offerings. Any intellectual property claim against us, with or without merit, could be time consuming and expensive to settle or litigate and could divert the attention of our management. Litigation regarding intellectual property rights is inherently uncertain due to the complex issues involved, and we may not be successful in defending ourselves in such matters.
Many potential litigants, including some patent holding companies, have the ability to dedicate substantial resources to enforcing their intellectual property rights. Any claims successfully brought against us could subject us to significant liability for damages, and we may be required to stop using technology or other intellectual property alleged to be in violation of a third party’s rights. We also might be required to seek a license for third-party intellectual property. Even if a license is available, we could be required to pay significant royalties or submit to unreasonable terms, which would increase our operating expenses. We may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant time and expense. If we cannot license or develop technology for any allegedly infringing aspect of our business, we would be forced to limit our service and may be unable to compete effectively. Any of these results could harm our business.
19
We may be unable to adequately protect or enforce our intellectual property rights, which could harm our reputation and adversely affect our growth prospects.
We regard our proprietary technologies and intellectual property as integral to our success. We protect our proprietary technology through a combination of trade secrets, third-party confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements, additional contractual restrictions on disclosure and use, and patent, copyright, and trademark laws.
We currently are the registered owners of many Internet domain names internationally. As we seek to protect our domain names in an increasing number of jurisdictions, we may not be successful in doing so in certain jurisdictions. Our competitors may adopt trade names or domain names similar to ours, thereby impeding our ability to promote our marketplace and possibly leading to customer confusion. In addition, we could face trade name or trademark or service mark infringement claims brought by owners of other registered or unregistered trademarks or service marks, including trademarks or service marks that may incorporate variations of our brand names. The legal means we use to protect our proprietary technology and intellectual property do not afford complete protection and may not adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep any competitive advantage. We cannot guarantee that any of our present or future intellectual property rights will not lapse or be invalidated, circumvented, challenged or abandoned; our intellectual property rights will provide competitive advantages to us; our ability to assert our intellectual property rights against potential competitors or to settle current or future disputes will not be limited by our agreements with third parties; any of our pending or future patent applications will be issued or have the coverage originally sought; or our intellectual property rights will be enforced in jurisdictions where competition may be intense or where legal protection may be weak.
We also may allow certain of our registered intellectual property rights, or our pending applications or registrations for intellectual property rights, to lapse or to become abandoned if we determine that obtaining or maintaining the applicable registered intellectual property rights is not worthwhile.
Further, although it is our practice to enter into confidentiality agreements and intellectual property assignment agreements with our employees and contractors, these agreements may not be enforceable or may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets or other proprietary information in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure or other breaches of the agreements.
Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy, reverse engineer, or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology. We cannot be certain that we will be able to prevent unauthorized use of our technology or infringement or misappropriation of our intellectual property, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary rights. Effective patent, copyright, trademark, service mark, trade secret, and domain name protection is time-consuming and expensive to maintain. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets, or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others, which could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources. In addition, our efforts may be met with defenses and counterclaims challenging the validity and enforceability of our intellectual property rights or may result in a court determining that our intellectual property rights are unenforceable. If we are unable to cost-effectively protect our intellectual property rights, then our business could be harmed. If competitors are able to use our technology or develop proprietary technology similar to ours or competing technologies, our ability to compete effectively and our growth prospects could be adversely affected.
We are subject to the terms of open source licenses because our technology platform incorporates open source software.
Some of the software powering our marketplace incorporates software covered by open source licenses. The terms of many open source licenses have not been interpreted by U.S. courts and there is a risk that the licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to operate our marketplace. Under certain open source licenses, we could be required to publicly release the source code of our software or to make our software available under open source licenses. To avoid the public release of the affected portions of our source code, we could be required to expend substantial time and resources to re-engineer some or all of our software which could significantly interrupt our operations.
In addition, use of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software because open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on the origin of the software. Use of open source software may also present additional security risks because the public availability of this software may make it easier for hackers and other third parties to determine how to compromise our technology platform. Any of these risks could be difficult to eliminate or manage and, if not addressed, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
20
Our business continuity plan may not operate effectively in the event of a significant interruption of our business.
We depend on our information and other systems and processes for the continuity and effective operation of our business. We have implemented a formal business continuity plan covering most significant aspects of our business that would take effect in the event of a significant interruption to our business, or the loss of key systems as a result of a natural or other disaster. Although we have tested our business continuity plan as part of the implementation, there can be no assurance that it will operate effectively or that our business, results of operations and financial condition will not be materially affected in the event of a significant interruption of our business.
If we were subject to a disaster or serious security breach, it could materially damage our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may occur as a result of our operations.
We maintain property and general liability insurance. This insurance may not remain available to us at commercially reasonable rates, and the amount of our coverage may not be adequate to cover all liabilities that we may incur. Our auctions generally involve the operation of large equipment close to a large number of people, and despite our focus on safe work practices, an accident could damage our facilities or injure auction attendees. Any major accident could harm our reputation and our business. In addition, if we were held liable for amounts exceeding the limits of our insurance coverage or for claims outside the scope of our coverage, the resulting costs could harm our financial condition and results of operations.
Certain global conditions may affect our ability to conduct successful events.
Like most businesses with global operations, we are subject to the risk of certain global or regional adverse conditions, such as pandemics or other disease outbreaks, including COVID-19, or natural disasters including extreme weather or other events, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, forest fires or floods that could hinder our ability to conduct our scheduled auctions, restrict our customers’ travel patterns or their desire to attend auctions or impact our online operations, including disrupting the Internet or mobile networks or one or more of our service providers. If this situation were to occur, we may not be able to generate sufficient equipment consignments to sustain our business or to attract enough bidders to our auctions to achieve world fair market values for the items we sell. This could harm our financial condition and results of operations. Some climatic models indicate that global warming may result in rising sea levels, increased intensity of weather, and increased frequency of extreme precipitation and flooding. To the extent these phenomena occur, the risks noted above may increase.
Our operating results are subject to quarterly variations.
Historically, our revenues and operating results have fluctuated from quarter to quarter. We expect to continue to experience these fluctuations as a result of the following factors, among others:
In addition, we may incur substantial costs when entering new geographies and the profitability of operations at new locations is uncertain as a result of the increased variability in the number and size of auctions at new sites. These and other factors may cause our future results to fall short of investor expectations or not to compare favorably to our past results. Further, as our results generally fluctuate from quarter to quarter, period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations may not be meaningful indicators of future performance.
New regulation in the areas of consumer privacy and commercial electronic messages may restrict or increase costs of our marketing efforts.
Our operation and marketing activities are subject to various types of regulations, including laws relating to the protection of personal information, consumer protection and competition. User data protection and communication-based laws may be interpreted and applied inconsistently from country to country, and these laws continue to develop in ways we cannot predict and that may adversely affect our business. Complying with these varying national requirements could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our marketing practices in a manner with adverse effects on our business, and violations of privacy-related laws can result in significant penalties. See “— We process, store, and use personal information and other data, which subjects us to a variety of evolving governmental regulation, industry standards and self-regulatory schemes, contractual obligations, and other legal obligations related to privacy and data protection, which may increase our
21
costs, decrease adoption and use of our products and services and expose us to liability.” A determination that there have been violations of laws relating to our marketing practices under communications-based laws could damage our reputation and expose us to significant damage awards, fines and other penalties that could, individually or in the aggregate, materially harm our business.
We process, store, and use personal information and other data, which subjects us to a variety of evolving governmental regulation, industry standards and self-regulatory schemes, contractual obligations, and other legal obligations related to privacy and data protection, which may increase our costs, decrease adoption and use of our products and services and expose us to liability.
There are a number of national, federal, provincial, state, local laws, rules and regulations, as well as contractual obligations and industry standards, that provide for certain obligations and restrictions with respect to data privacy and security, including with regard to the collection, storage, use, sharing, disclosure and deletion of personal information and other customer or employee data. The scope of these obligations and restrictions is changing, subject to differing interpretations, and may be inconsistent among countries or conflict with other rules, and their status remains uncertain.
Within the EU, the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which replaced the EU Directive 95/46/EC, applies to a company which processes personal information as part of its activities or one its branches established in the EU, regardless of where such data is processed, or where a company established outside the EU offers goods or services or monitors the behaviour of individuals in the EU. GDPR governs the collection, storage, use, sharing, disclosure, deletion and other processing of personal information and other customer or employee data. Penalties for non-compliance with the GDPR are considerable, allowing EU regulators to impose a monetary penalty equal to the greater of €100 million or 4% of a non-compliant organization’s worldwide annual turnover. Such penalties would be in addition to the rights of individuals to sue for damages in respect of any data privacy breach which causes them to suffer loss.
GDPR, and applicable member states’ implementations thereof, require the transfer of personal information to us and by us from the EU to be governed by a lawful transfer mechanism. If the lawful transfer mechanisms we rely on for such transfers are considered illegitimate by EU member state courts or supervisory authorities, our ability to transmit and share data with our affiliated entities, service providers and third-party partners may be limited and could cause us to incur substantial costs to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.
As Internet commerce and related technologies continue to evolve, thereby increasing capacity to process large volumes of personal information, consumer sentiment towards increased transparency and control and further regulation by federal, provincial, state or foreign governments and agencies becomes more likely. We believe that the adoption of increasingly restrictive regulation in the field of data privacy and security is likely in both the U.S. and in other jurisdictions, possibly as restrictive as the EU model. California’s new law, the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”), came into force at the start of 2020 and gives the Attorney General of California the right to levy civil penalties and commence lawsuits for alleged violations. In other jurisdictions, data protection regulators, in addition to imposing penalties, have the power to seek injunctive relief and make various orders, including the cessation of certain data processing activities. Obligations and restrictions imposed by CCPA and other current and future applicable laws, regulations, contracts and industry standards could increase the cost of our operations and may affect our ability to provide all the current features of our products and services requiring us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business. Failure to comply with these obligations and restrictions could subject us to lawsuits, fines, criminal penalties, statutory damages, consent decrees, injunctions, adverse publicity and other losses that could harm our business.
In addition to government activity, privacy advocacy groups and industry groups have adopted and are considering the adoption of various self-regulatory standards and codes of conduct that, if applied to our business or current practices may place additional burdens on us, which may increase the costs of our products and services further reducing demand and harming our business.
Our customers may also accidentally disclose their passwords or store them on a mobile device that is lost or stolen, creating the perception that our systems are not secure against third-party access. Additionally, our third-party contractors may have access to customer data. If these or other third-party vendors violate applicable laws or our policies, such violations may also put our customers’ information at risk and could in turn have a material and adverse effect on our business. Any failure by us to protect our customers’ privacy and data, including as a result of our systems being compromised by hacking or other malicious or surreptitious activity, could result in a loss of customer confidence and ultimately in a loss of customers, which could materially and adversely affect our business.
22
Our articles, by-laws, shareholder rights plan and Canadian legislation contain provisions that may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control.
Certain provisions of our articles of amalgamation, and by-laws, as well as certain provisions of the Canada Business Corporations Act (the “CBCA”) and applicable Canadian securities law, could discourage potential acquisition proposals, delay or prevent a change in control or materially adversely impact the price that certain investors might be willing to pay for our common shares. Our articles of amalgamation authorize our board of directors to determine the designations, rights and restrictions to be attached to, and to issue an unlimited number of, junior preferred shares and senior preferred shares.
Our by-laws contain provisions establishing that shareholders must give advance notice to us in circumstances where nominations of persons for election to our board of directors are made by our shareholders other than pursuant to either a requisition of a meeting made in accordance with the provisions of the CBCA or a shareholder proposal made in accordance with the provisions of the CBCA.
Among other things, these advance notice provisions set a deadline by which shareholders must notify us in writing of an intention to nominate directors for election to the board of directors prior to any shareholder meeting at which directors are to be elected and set forth the information required in this notice for it to be valid.
Our board of directors has adopted a shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”), pursuant to which we issued one right in respect of each common share outstanding. Under the Rights Plan, following a transaction in which any person becomes an “acquiring person” as defined in the Rights Plan, each right will entitle the holder to receive a number of common shares provided in the Rights Plan. The purposes of the Rights Plan are (i) to provide our board of directors time to consider value-enhancing alternatives to a take-over bid and to allow competing bids to emerge; (ii) to ensure that shareholders are provided equal treatment under a take-over bid; and (iii) to give adequate time for shareholders to properly assess a take-over bid without undue pressure. The Rights Plan can potentially impose a significant penalty on any person commencing a takeover bid that would result in the offeror becoming the beneficial owner of 20% or more of our outstanding common shares.
Any of these provisions, as well as certain provisions of the CBCA and applicable Canadian securities law, may discourage a potential acquirer from proposing or completing a transaction that may have otherwise presented a premium to our shareholders.
U.S. civil liabilities may not be enforceable against us, our directors, or our officers.
We are governed by the CBCA and our principal place of business is in Canada. Many of our directors and officers reside outside of the U.S. and all or a substantial portion of their assets, as well as a substantial portion of our assets, are located outside the U.S. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within the U.S. upon us and such directors and officers or to enforce judgments obtained against us or such persons, in U.S. courts, in any action, including actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws or any other laws of the U.S.
Additionally, rights predicated solely upon civil liability provisions of U.S. federal securities laws or any other laws of the U.S. may not be enforceable in original actions, or actions to enforce judgments obtained in U.S. courts, brought in Canadian courts, including courts in the Province of British Columbia.
We are governed by the corporate laws of Canada which in some cases have a different effect on shareholders than the corporate laws of Delaware.
We are governed by the CBCA and other relevant laws, which may affect the rights of shareholders differently than those of a company governed by the laws of a U.S. jurisdiction, and may, together with our charter documents, have the effect of delaying, deferring or discouraging another party from acquiring control of our company by means of a tender offer, a proxy contest or otherwise, or may affect the price an acquiring party would be willing to offer in such an instance.
ITEM 1B: UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2: PROPERTIES
We own and lease various properties in Canada, the United States and 10 other countries globally. We use the properties as auction sites and executive and administrative offices. Our corporate headquarters are located in Burnaby, Canada, and are held through a lease that expires in May 2030. We also lease a U.S. Leadership Office in Chicago, United States, a European head office in Breda, the Netherlands, and IronPlanet’s head office in Pleasanton, United States. We own an administrative office in Lincoln, United States.
International network of auction sites
We generally attempt to establish our auction sites in industrial areas close to major cities. Although we lease some auction sites, we have historically preferred to purchase land and construct purpose-built facilities once we have established a base of business and determined that a region can generate sufficient financial returns to justify the investment.
We generally do not construct a permanent auction site in a region until we have conducted several offsite sales in the area, and often we will operate from a regional auction site for several years before considering a more permanent investment. This process allows us to establish our business and evaluate the market potential before we make a significant investment. We will not invest in a permanent auction site unless we believe there is an opportunity for significant, profitable growth in that region. Our average expenditure on a permanent auction site has been in the range of $20 to $25 million, including land, improvements and buildings.
We currently have 40 locations in our auction site network, comprised of 35 permanent auctions sites and five regional sites as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. A permanent auction site includes locations that we own and on which we have constructed an auction theatre and other facilities (e.g. refurbishment), and that we lease with an original term longer than three years and on which we have built permanent structures with an investment of more than $1.5 million.
A regional auction site is a location that we lease on a term longer than one year, have limited investment in facilities (i.e. less than $1.5 million) and on which we average more than two auctions per year on a rolling two-year basis and have at least two full time staff. This category also includes sites located on land that we own with limited investment in facilities.
Our auction site network as of the date of this discussion is as follows:
Number of acres
Year placed
Lease
Total
Developed
Developable
into service
Nature
expiry date
Permanent auction sites
Canada:
Edmonton, Alberta
267
175
92
2002
Owned
Grande Prairie, Alberta
153
68
2009
Montreal, Quebec
91
—
2000
Toronto, Ontario
65
1998
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
60
40
2006
Regina, Saskatchewan
47
2007
Halifax, Nova Scotia
25
1997
Chilliwack, British Columbia
2010
United States:
Orlando, Florida
225
189
27
Chehalis, Washington
204
131
2012
North East, Maryland
193
80
28
2001
Denver, Colorado
143
70
72
Columbus, Ohio
130
95
Houston, Texas
128
116
Minneapolis, Minnesota
122
52
Fort Worth, Texas
127
1994
Atlanta, Georgia
94
62
1996
Chicago, Illinois
71
Sacramento, California
90
2005
United States (continued):
Las Vegas, Nevada
77
Leased
31-May-33
Los Angeles, California
63
Phoenix, Arizona
48
Nashville, Tennessee
46
Kansas City, Missouri
2008
Salt Lake City, Utah
37
28-Feb-24
Other:
Mexico City (Polotitlan), Mexico
324
82
207
Madrid (Ocaña), Spain
85
Moerdijk, The Netherlands
1999
Milan (Caorso), Italy
42
Paris (St. Aubin sur Gaillon), France
50
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
44
30-Jun-29
Brisbane, Australia
Meppen, Germany
41
31-Oct-24
Melbourne (Geelong), Australia
2013
Tokyo (Narita), Japan
Regional auction sites
Tipton, United States
30-Jun-21
Lethbridge, Canada
2011
30-Jun-23
Maltby, United Kingdom
2019
31-Jan-35
North Franklin, United States
2017
31-Jul-21
North Battleford, Canada
14-Nov-22
We also own the following developable properties that are not currently under development but are available for future auction site expansion:
Number
Year
of acres
acquired
Casa Grande, United States
125
Tulare, United States
99
We believe that our administrative offices and developed auction sites are adequate and suitable for the conduct of our operations. Further, we believe that our properties that are being developed to expand our existing auction sites are sufficient to support the growth of our live on-site business.
In early 2018, the Company entered into long-term leases in Las Vegas, Nevada and Chambersburg, Pennsylvania to support the Company’s government business. These warehouses became fully operational in the third quarter of 2018 and continue to support the U.S Government’s Defense and Logistics Agency non-rolling stock contract.
In December 2018 we entered into a long-term lease agreement for a property in Maltby, United Kingdom to replace our Donnington Park, United Kingdom auction site in the East Midlands. We have commenced the long-term development process and expect this site to be complete in 2021. We conducted our first sales at this location in 2019 using temporary facilities while the development process continues.
ITEM 3: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We have no material legal proceedings pending, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, and we do not know of any material proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities.
ITEM 4: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
ITEM 5: MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Outstanding Share Data
We are a public company and our common shares are listed under the symbol “RBA” on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”). Financial information about our equity and share-based payments is set forth in our consolidated financial statement footnotes 23 “Equity and dividends” and 24 “Share-based payments” in “Part II, Item 8: “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Market Information
Our common shares, without par value, are issued in registered form. The transfer agent for the shares is Computershare Trust Company of Canada, 100 University Avenue, 9th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2Y1. Our common shares trade on the NYSE and on the TSX under the symbol “RBA”. On February 27, 2020, there were 417 holders of record of our common shares that do not include the shareholders for whom shares are held in a nominee or street name.
Dividend Policy
We currently pay a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.20 per common share. We currently intend to continue to declare and pay a regular quarterly cash dividend on our common shares; however, any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our Board, after considering our operating results, financial condition, cash requirements, financing agreement restrictions and any other factors our Board may deem relevant.
Because Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated is a holding company with no material assets other than the shares of its subsidiaries, our ability to pay dividends on our common shares depends on the income and cash flow of our subsidiaries. No financing agreements to which our subsidiaries are party currently restrict those subsidiaries from paying dividends.
Pursuant to income tax legislation, Canadian resident individuals who receive “eligible dividends” in 2006 and subsequent years will be entitled to an enhanced gross-up and dividend tax credit on such dividends. All dividends that we pay are “eligible dividends” unless indicated otherwise.
Comparison of Cumulative Return
The following graph compares the cumulative return on a $100 investment in our common shares over the last five fiscal years beginning December 31, 2014 through December 31, 2019, to that of the cumulative return on a $100 investment in the Russell Global Index (“Russell 2000”), the S&P / TSX Composite Index (“S&P/TSX”) and the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (“DJIA”) for the same period. In calculating the cumulative return, reinvestment of dividends, if any, is assumed. The indices are included for comparative purpose only. This graph is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.
Company / index
2014
2015
2016
2018
RBA (NYSE)
$
100.00
107.8
151.2
133.5
145.7
162.6
Russell 2000
97.6
116.6
132.0
115.9
138.5
S&P/TSX
95.5
112.2
119.0
105.1
DJIA
119.2
149.1
140.7
160.1
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information about the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2019.
Number of securities remaining
Number of securities to be issued
Weighted average exercise
available for future issuance under
upon exercise of options,
price of outstanding options,
equity compensation plans (excluding
warrants and rights
securities reflected in column (a))
Plan Category
(a)
(b)
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
3,463,333
(1)
29.05
(2)
9,343,445
(3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Exchange Controls
Canada has no system of exchange controls. There are no Canadian restrictions on the repatriation of capital or earnings of a Canadian public company to non-resident investors. There are no laws in Canada or exchange restrictions affecting the remittance of dividends, profits, interest, royalties and other payments to U.S. Resident Holders (as defined below) of our common shares, except as discussed in “Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Residents” below.
There are no limitations under the laws of Canada or in our organizational documents on the right of foreigners to hold or vote our common shares, except that the Investment Canada Act may require review and approval by the Minister of Industry (Canada) of certain acquisitions of control of Ritchie Bros. by a “non-Canadian”. “Non-Canadian” generally means an individual who is not a Canadian citizen, or a corporation, partnership, trust or joint venture that is ultimately controlled by non-Canadians.
Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Residents
The following summarizes certain Canadian federal income tax consequences generally applicable under the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the regulations enacted thereunder (collectively, the “Canadian Tax Act”) and the Canada-U.S. Income Tax Convention (1980) (the “Convention”) to the holding and disposition of common shares.
This summary is restricted to holders of common shares each of whom, at all material times for the purposes of the Canadian Tax Act and the Convention, (i) is resident solely in the U.S., (ii) is entitled to the full benefits of the Convention, (iii) holds all common shares as capital property, (iii) holds no common shares that are “taxable Canadian property” (within the meaning of the Canadian Tax Act) of the holder, (iv) deals at arm’s length with and is not affiliated with Ritchie Bros., (v) does not and is not deemed to use or hold any common shares in a business carried on in Canada, and (vi) is not an "authorized foreign bank" (as defined in the Canadian Tax Act) or an insurer that carries on business in Canada and elsewhere (each such holder, a “U.S. Resident Holder”).
Certain U.S.-resident entities that are fiscally transparent for U.S. federal income tax purposes (including limited liability companies) may not be regarded by the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) as entitled to the benefits of the Convention. Members of or holders of an interest in such an entity that holds common shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding the extent, if any, to which the CRA will extend the benefits of the Convention to the entity in respect of its common shares.
Generally, a U.S. Resident Holder’s common shares will be considered to be capital property of a U.S. Resident Holder provided that the U.S. Resident Holder acquired the common shares as a long-term investment; is not a trader or dealer in securities; did not acquire, hold or dispose of the common shares in one or more transactions considered to be an adventure or concern in the nature of trade; and does not hold the common shares as inventory in the course of carrying on a business.
This summary is based on the provisions of the Canadian Tax Act and the Convention in effect on the date hereof, all specific proposals to amend the Canadian Tax Act and Convention publicly announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) on or before the date hereof (the “Tax Proposals”), and the current published administrative and assessing policies of the CRA. It is assumed that the Tax Proposals will be enacted as currently proposed, and that there will be no other material change to any applicable law or administrative or assessing practice, whether by judicial, legislative, governmental or administrative decision or action, although no assurance can be given in these respects. Except as otherwise expressly provided, this summary does not take into account any provincial, territorial or foreign tax considerations, which may differ materially from those set out herein.
This summary is of a general nature only and it is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any holder of common shares, and no representation with respect to Canadian federal income tax consequences to any holder of common shares is made herein. Accordingly, holders of common shares should consult their own tax advisers with respect to their individual circumstances.
Disposition of common shares
A U.S. Resident Holder will not be subject to tax under the Canadian Tax Act in respect of any capital gain realized by such U.S. Resident Holder on a disposition of common shares unless the common shares constitute “taxable Canadian property” (within the meaning of the Canadian Tax Act) of the U.S. Resident Holder at the time of disposition and the U.S. Resident Holder is not entitled under the Convention to an exemption from Canadian tax on the gain.
Generally, a U.S. Resident Holder’s common shares will not constitute “taxable Canadian property” of the U.S. Resident Holder at a particular time at which the common shares are listed on a “designated stock exchange” (which currently includes the TSX and NYSE) unless at any time during the 60-month period immediately preceding a disposition both of the following conditions are true:
In certain circumstances set out in the Canadian Tax Act, a common share may be deemed to be “taxable Canadian property” for purposes of the Canadian Tax Act.
Even if the common shares constitute “taxable Canadian property” to a U.S. Resident Holder, under the Convention, such a U.S. Resident Holder will not be subject to tax under the Canadian Tax Act on any capital gain realized by such holder on a disposition of such common shares, provided the value of such common shares is not derived principally from real property situated in Canada (within the meaning of the Convention).
U.S. Resident Holders whose shares may be taxable Canadian property should consult their own tax advisors
Dividends on common shares
Under the Canadian Tax Act, dividends on shares paid or credited, or deemed to be paid or credited, to a non-resident of Canada (or amounts paid or credited on account, or in lieu of payment of, or in satisfaction of, dividends) will be subject to Canadian withholding tax at the rate of 25% of the gross amount of the dividends (subject to reduction under the provisions of any applicable tax treaty). Under the Convention, a U.S. Resident Holder that beneficially owns the dividends will generally be subject to Canadian withholding tax at the rate of 15% of the gross amount of such dividends unless the beneficial owner is a company which owns (or is deemed under the Convention to own) at least 10% of the voting shares of Ritchie Bros. at that time, in which case the rate of Canadian withholding tax is generally reduced to 5%.
Share Repurchase Program
On May 9, 2019, we announced a share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to $100 million worth of our common shares, approved by the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”), over a period of 12 months, ending May 8, 2020. For additional information on our share repurchases, please see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Outstanding Share Data—Share Repurchase Program,” the contents of which are incorporated by reference into this Item 5.
29
ITEM 6: SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015 through December 31, 2019. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“Topic 606”) using the full retrospective method. The primary impact of the adoption of Topic 606 is the change in the presentation of revenue earned from inventory sales and ancillary and logistical services. These revenues are presented gross of the related expenses rather than net. All prior period revenue figures below have been restated to reflect the adoption of Topic 606.
Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted ASU 2016-02 Leases (“Topic 842”) using the “optional transition method”, which allows us to adopt this new lease standard at the adoption date. The comparative periods presented below are reported pursuant to Topic 840.
The following selected consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with “Part II, Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in “Part II, Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” presented elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Year ended and as at December 31,
(in U.S.$000's, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Income Statements Data
Service revenue
804,024
749,515
624,417
555,843
524,672
Inventory sales revenue
514,617
420,511
346,774
571,134
555,827
Total revenue
1,318,641
1,170,026
971,191
1,126,977
1,080,499
Operating income
223,202
185,189
107,454
135,722
174,840
Income before income taxes
190,763
152,512
77,394
130,494
176,436
Net income attributable to stockholders
149,140
121,479
75,027
91,832
136,214
Earnings per share attributable to stockholders:
Basic
1.37
1.12
0.70
0.86
1.27
Diluted
1.36
1.11
0.69
0.85
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data
Working capital
178,326
163,446
120,032
125,164
140,133
Total assets
2,229,430
2,052,392
2,017,312
1,599,533
1,120,115
Long-term debt
645,481
711,298
812,892
595,706
97,915
Contingently redeemable non-controlling interests
24,785
Stockholders' equity
901,833
830,643
739,682
687,057
703,176
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data
Dividends declared per common share
0.76
0.68
0.66
0.60
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
675,851
45,511
12,107
Net capital spending
35,075
32,426
34,411
29,785
14,152
ITEM 7: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
About Us
Established in 1958, Ritchie Bros. (NYSE and TSX: RBA) is a global asset management and disposition company, offering customers end-to-end solutions for buying and selling used heavy equipment, trucks and other assets. Operating in a number of sectors, including construction, transportation, agriculture, energy, oil and gas, mining, and forestry, the company’s selling channels include: Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers, the world’s largest industrial auctioneer offers live auction events with online bidding; IronPlanet, an online marketplace with featured weekly auctions and providing the exclusive IronClad Assurance® equipment condition certification; Marketplace-E, a controlled marketplace offering multiple price and timing options; Mascus, a leading European online equipment listing service; and Ritchie Bros. Private Treaty, offering privately negotiated sales. The company’s suite of multichannel sales solutions also includes RB Asset Solutions, a complete end-to-end asset management and disposition system. Ritchie Bros. also offers sector-specific solutions including GovPlanet, TruckPlanet, and Kruse Energy Auctioneers, plus equipment financing and leasing through Ritchie Bros. Financial Services.
Through our unreserved live on site auctions, online marketplaces, and private brokerage services, we sell a broad range of used and unused equipment, including earthmoving equipment, truck trailers, government surplus, oil and gas equipment and other industrial assets. Construction and heavy machinery comprise the majority of the equipment sold through our multiple brand solutions. Customers selling equipment through our sales channels include end-users (such as construction companies), equipment dealers, original equipment manufacturers, and other equipment owners (such as rental companies and government bodies). Our customers participate in a variety of sectors, including heavy construction, transportation, agriculture, energy, and mining.
Overview
This section of the Form 10-K generally discusses 2019 and 2018 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018. Discussions of 2017 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2018 and 2017 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”, “Part II, Item 6: Selected Financial Data”, and the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements due to various factors, including those set forth under “Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The date of this discussion is as of February 27, 2020.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”). Except for GTV, which is a measure of operational performance and not a measure of financial performance, liquidity, or revenue, the amounts discussed below are based on our consolidated financial statements. Unless indicated otherwise, all tabular dollar amounts, including related footnotes, presented below are expressed in thousands of United States (“U.S.”) dollars.
In the accompanying analysis of financial information, we sometimes use information derived from consolidated financial data but not presented in our financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP. Certain of these data are considered “non-GAAP financial measures” under the SEC rules. The definitions and reasons we use these non-GAAP financial measures and the reconciliations to their most directly comparable US GAAP financial measures are included either with the first use thereof or in the Non-GAAP Measures section within the MD&A. Non-GAAP financial measures referred to in this report are labeled as “non-GAAP measure” or designated as such with an asterisk (*).
Performance Overview
Net income attributable to stockholders increased 23% to $149.0 million compared to $121.5 million in 2018. Diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) attributable to stockholders increased 23% to $1.36 from $1.11 per share, while diluted adjusted EPS attributable to stockholders* increased 23% to $1.33 from $1.08 per share in 2018.
Consolidated results:
A&M segment results:
Other Services segment results:
Operational highlights
In 2019, our operational focus continued to strengthen our sales execution and drive incremental network effects from our foundational core customer solutions and the IronPlanet acquisition. Under our strategic framework of GROW, DRIVE and OPTIMIZE, shown below are some notable highlights:
GROW Revenues and Earnings
32
DRIVE Efficiencies and Effectiveness
OPTIMIZE our balance sheet
33
Results of Operations
Year ended December 31,
% Change
(in U.S. $000's, except EPS and percentages)
2019 over 2018
2018 over 2017
Service revenue:
Commissions
431,781
420,160
394,397
%
Fees
372,243
329,355
230,020
43
Total service revenue
Service revenue as a % of total revenue
61.0
64.1
64.3
-310 bps
-20 bps
Inventory sales revenue as a % of total revenue
39.0
35.9
35.7
310 bps
20 bps
Costs of services
164,977
159,058
133,189
Cost of inventory sold
480,839
374,339
306,498
Selling, general and administrative expenses
382,389
382,676
323,270
0
Operating expenses
1,095,439
984,837
863,737
Cost of inventory sold as a % of operating expenses
43.9
38.0
35.5
590 bps
250 bps
Operating income margin
16.9
15.8
11.1
110 bps
470 bps
149,039
Adjusted net income attributable to stockholders*
145,649
117,669
87,662
34
Diluted earnings per share attributable to stockholders
61
Diluted adjusted EPS attributable to stockholders*
1.33
1.08
0.81
Effective tax rate
21.8
20.3
2.7
150 bps
1760 bps
Total GTV
5,140,587
4,964,165
4,467,982
Service revenue as a % of total GTV- Rate
15.6
15.1
14.0
50 bps
Inventory sales revenue as a % of total GTV-Mix
10.0
8.5
7.8
70 bps
Total revenue increased 13% to $1.3 billion as compared to 2018.
Service revenue increased 7%, driven by 3% increase in commissions revenue and a 13% increase in fee revenue. The increase in commissions revenue was in line with higher Service GTV of 2%, with strong performance in our US region, where we experienced volume growth through both our live auctions and weekly featured online businesses. The increase in fee revenue was driven primarily by higher total GTV, full buyer fee harmonization implemented in June 2019, and RBFS fee revenue growth. These were partially offset by lower RB Logistics revenue earned in the International region.
Inventory sales revenue as a percent of total GTV increased to 10.0% as compared to 8.5% in 2018.
Inventory sales revenue increased 22% primarily due to our US region, where we had a greater volume of inventory contracts at our live auctions including a large dispersal of pipeline equipment at the Columbus, Ohio auction in Q2 2019 and increased inventory contracts at our Orlando, Florida auction in Q1 2019. Continued revenue growth in our GovPlanet surplus contract also contributed to the increase in inventory sales revenue. This increase was partially offset by large non-repeating dispersals of oil and gas equipment and agricultural real estate in Canada during 2018.
Operating income increased 21% to $223.2 million compared to $185.2 million in 2018. This increase was primarily due to the 13% increase in total revenue. Operating expenses increased 11%, less than the rate of increase in revenue primarily due to strong cost control, a $4.1 million recovery of share-based payment expense related to the departure of our former Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), and higher foreign exchange gains.
Income tax expense and effective tax rate
We recorded an income tax expense of $41.6 million in 2019 compared to $31.0 million in 2018. Our effective tax rate was 21.8% compared to 20.3% in 2018. The increase in effective tax rate over the comparative period was primarily the result of a greater proportion of earnings taxed in jurisdictions with higher tax rates.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or TCJA was enacted in the United States on December 22, 2017. It is possible that additional legislation, regulations and/or guidance may be issued, and possibly with retroactive effect, in the future that may result in additional adjustments to the tax expense recorded related to the TCJA.
Net income
Net income attributable to stockholders increased 23% to $149.0 million compared to $121.5 million in 2018. The increase was primarily due to higher operating income and lower interest expense, partially offset by higher taxes and a non-recurring gain on sale of equity accounted investment recorded in 2018.
Diluted EPS
Diluted EPS attributable to stockholders increased 23% to $1.36 per share compared to $1.11 in 2018. This increase is primarily due to the increase in net income attributable to stockholders.
U.S. dollar exchange rate comparison
We conduct global operations in many different currencies, with our presentation currency being the U.S dollar. The following table presents the variance in select foreign exchange rates over the comparative reporting periods:
2019 over
2018 over
Value of one local currency to U.S dollar
Period-end exchange rate
Canadian dollar
0.7656
0.7331
0.7954
(8)
Euro
1.1202
1.1469
1.2002
(2)
(4)
Australian dollar
0.7002
0.7052
0.7809
(1)
(10)
Average exchange rate
0.7537
0.7716
0.7704
1.1195
1.1804
1.1273
(5)
0.6951
0.7469
0.7664
(7)
(3)
In 2019, approximately 42% of our revenues and 44% of our operating expenses were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, compared to 50% and 53%, respectively, in 2018.
We recognized $2.9 million in foreign exchange gains in 2019 and $0.2 million of gains in 2018. Foreign exchange had an unfavourable impact on total revenue and a favourable impact on expenses. These impacts were primarily due to the fluctuations in the Euro and Canadian dollar exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar.
Non-GAAP Measures
As part of management’s non-GAAP measures, we may eliminate the financial impact of adjusting items which are after-tax effects of significant non-recurring items that we do not consider to be part of our normal operating results, such as acquisition-related costs, management reorganization costs, severance, share-based payment expense recovery due to the departure of our former CEO, retention, gains/losses on sale of an equity accounted for investment, plant and equipment, impairment losses, and certain other items, which we refer to as ‘adjusting items’.
Adjusted net income attributable to stockholders* increased 24%, to $145.6 million compared to $117.7 million in 2018.
Diluted adjusted EPS attributable to stockholders* increased 23% to $1.33 per share compared to $1.08 per share in 2018.
Adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”)* increased 15% to $294.7 million compared to $257.3 million in 2018.
Debt at December 31, 2019 represented 4.4 times net income for 2019, compared to debt at December 31, 2018, which represented 6.0 times net income for 2018. The decrease in this debt/net income multiplier was primarily due to lower debt balances at December 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018, as a result of our voluntary and mandatory debt repayments. The adjusted net debt/adjusted EBITDA* was 1.0 times at December 31, 2019 compared to 1.9 times at December 31, 2018. The decrease in adjusted net debt/adjusted EBITDA* was primarily due to lower debt balances at December 31, 2019, as well as a 14% increase in EBITDA compared to the prior year.
35
Segment Performance
We provide our customers with a wide array of services. The following table presents a breakdown of our consolidated results between the A&M segment and Other services segment. A complete listing of channels and brand solutions under the A&M segment, as well as our Other services segment, is available under Item 1 of this Annual Report.
Year ended December 31, 2019
Year ended December 31, 2018
Year ended December 31, 2017
(in U.S $000's)
A&M
Other
Consolidated
678,823
125,201
626,007
123,508
524,023
100,394
1,193,440
1,046,518
870,797
Ancillary and logistical service expenses
59,252
66,576
54,176
Other costs of services
99,821
5,904
105,725
87,430
5,052
92,482
75,685
3,328
79,013
SG&A expenses
358,016
24,373
363,549
19,127
308,873
14,397
Impairment loss
8,911
Segment profit
254,764
35,672
290,436
221,200
32,753
253,953
170,830
28,493
199,323
Auctions and Marketplaces segment
Results of A&M segment operations are presented below for the comparative reporting periods.
A&M service revenue as a % of total A&M revenue
56.9
59.8
60.2
-290 bps
-40 bps
Inventory sales revenue as a % of total A&M revenue
43.1
40.2
39.8
290 bps
40 bps
A&M segment expenses
938,676
825,318
699,967
Cost of inventory sold as a % of A&M expenses
51.2
45.4
43.8
580 bps
160 bps
A&M segment profit
A&M service revenue as a % of total GTV- Rate
13.2
12.6
11.7
60 bps
90 bps
Gross Transaction Value
We believe it is meaningful to consider revenue in relation to GTV. GTV by channel and by revenue type are presented below for the comparative reporting periods.
GTV by Channel
(in U.S. $000's, except percentages)
Live on site auctions
4,175,527
4,134,838
3,947,730
Percentage of total
81.2
83.3
88.4
Online marketplaces including featured (1) and other (2)
965,060
829,327
520,252
59
18.8
16.7
11.6
GTV
GTV increased 4% and increased 5% when excluding the impact of foreign exchange as compared to 2018. The increase in GTV was led by a 16% increase in online marketplaces and 1% growth in live on site auctions. Online marketplaces increased due to US strategic accounts and alliances, as well as GovPlanet. International and Canada online GTV also increased due to growing demand for listings on the Marketplace-E platform.
36
GTV from live on site auctions increased primarily due to increased volume at our US live on site auctions with growth performance at our year-on-year industrial auctions, including a $94 million auction in Columbus, Ohio and our largest auction held in Orlando, Florida, coupled with higher number of auctions held during the year. This increase was partially offset by softer performance in the Western Canada region, partly due large non-repeating dispersals of oil and gas equipment and agricultural real estate in Canada during 2018. We also experienced lower demand in the International region particularly during the second half of 2019.
GTV by Revenue Type
Service GTV
4,625,970
4,543,654
4,121,208
90.0
91.5
92.2
Inventory GTV
GTV increased 4% while Inventory GTV increased 22%, and Service GTV increased 2%. The increase in Inventory GTV was primarily driven by a strong volume performance in our US live auctions and continued growth in our GovPlanet surplus contract.
We offer our customers the opportunity to use underwritten commission contracts to serve their disposition strategy needs, entering into such contracts where the risk and reward profile of the terms are agreeable. Our underwritten contracts, which include inventory and guarantee contracts, increased as a percentage of total GTV to 20% compared to 17% in 2018 primarily due to increased GTV signed with inventory contracts.
Online bidding
Across all channels, 65% of total GTV was purchased by online buyers compared to 59% in 2018. These increases in internet bidders and online buyers demonstrate the continued growth in adoption of multi-channel participation at our auctions.
Industrial Live On Site Metrics
Total industrial live on site auction metrics
For the year ended December 31,
Number of auctions
194
183
245
(25)
Bidder registrations
732,550
555,000
575,500
Consignors
58,850
53,950
56,850
Buyers
153,400
135,250
139,900
Lots
422,800
377,000
382,500
In 2019, we held 11 additional industrial auctions and these additional auctions contributed to the 1% growth in our live on site auctions GTV. The 11 additional industrial auctions added were each of a smaller scale compared to our average auctions.
The total number of industrial lots increased 12% to 422,800 and the total number of lots including agricultural lots increased 10% to 448,050 lots. These increases were partially due to an increase in small value lots sold in the US and Canada.
GTV on a per lot basis generated at our industrial live on site auctions decreased 9% to $9,400 compared to $10,300 in 2018, partially due to a higher number of small value lots sold in the US and Canada, and price softening of agricultural equipment.
12 months average metrics per industrial live on site auction
20.5 million
21.2 million
15.2 million
39
3,776
3,033
2,348
303
295
232
2,179
2,060
1,562
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we saw a decrease in average GTV per industrial auction compared to the prior year periods.
Productivity
The majority of our business continues to be generated by our A&M segment operations. Sales Force Productivity within this segment is an operational statistic that we believe provides a gauge of the effectiveness of our Revenue Producers in increasing GTV. Revenue Producers is a term used to describe our revenue-producing sales personnel. This definition is comprised of Regional Sales Managers and Territory Managers.
Our Sales Force Productivity for the year ended December 31, 2019 increased 6% to $12.3 million per Revenue Producer as compared to $11.6 million per Revenue Producer in 2018.
A&M revenue
Total A&M revenue increased 14% to $1.2 billion compared to $1.0 billion in 2018.
A&M revenue by geographical region are presented below:
United States
419,164
373,555
298,566
270,616
126,627
110,991
114
A&M revenue- United States
689,780
500,182
409,557
38
167,389
160,751
137,150
40,634
88,680
81,740
(54)
A&M revenue- Canada
208,023
249,431
218,890
(17)
International
92,270
91,701
88,307
203,367
205,204
154,043
A&M revenue- International
295,637
296,905
242,350
A&M total revenue
Service revenue increased 12% with fee growth from higher total GTV and also due to the full harmonization of buyer fees. Commissions revenue also increased in line with higher GTV on the growth performance on both our online and live auction platforms. Inventory sales revenue increased 114% primarily due to growth in our year-on-year comparative auctions, particularly driven by a higher proportion of inventory contracts at the larger Columbus, Ohio and Florida, Orlando auctions. Continued growth of the GovPlanet surplus contract which started operations in Q2 2018 also contributed to the increase in inventory sales revenue.
Service revenue increased 4% primarily due to higher fees from the full harmonization of buyer fees and higher volume of small value lots. Our buyer fees are earned on a per transaction basis, and as such, the higher volume of small value lots is also a contributing factor to the increase in fees revenue. This increase was partially offset by lower commissions earned on lower GTV from softer performance in the Western Canada region. Inventory sales revenue decreased 54% primarily due to large non-repeating dispersals of oil and gas equipment and agricultural real estate during 2018.
Service revenue increased 1% due to the full harmonization of buyer fees offset by lower commissions earned from lower GTV in Asia and Europe. The 1% decrease in Inventory sales revenue was driven by lower demand and tightened supply markets in the European and Asia macroeconomic environment, particularly during the second half of 2019.
A&M cost of services increased 14% to $99.8 million primarily due to a one-time fee paid to an unrelated third party in connection with a dispersal of the pipeline equipment at our Columbus, Ohio auction, costs incurred to support our GovPlanet surplus contracts, and overall cost increase in-line with the growth in service GTV.
A&M cost of inventory sold increased 28% to $480.8 million, higher than the overall increase in inventory sales volume, as a result of the trailing effect of selling through some lower performing inventory packages acquired within our International region. In addition, rates earned on our GovPlanet surplus contracts have normalized after a full year of operation. There was also discrete lower price performance on certain equipment categories which were in greater supply at our Orlando auction in Q1 2019.
A&M segment SG&A expenses decreased 2% to $358.0 million due to a favourable impact of foreign exchange fluctuations and a $4.1 million share-based payment expense recovery related to the departure of our former CEO. This was partially offset by on-going incremental costs related to GovPlanet operations and additional headcount to support our growth initiatives.
Other Services Segment
Results of Other Services segment operations are presented below for the comparative reporting periods.
(11)
Other services profit
Other Services revenue increased 1% to $125.2 million primarily due to growth of RBFS revenue of $5.6 million, offset by lower RB Logistics service revenue due to lower inventory sales in Europe requiring logistics.
RBFS revenue increased 24% in 2019 as compared to 2018 due to growth in funded volume. Funded volume, which represents the amount of lending brokered by RBFS, increased 18% to $510.2 million.
Other Services profit increased 9% to $35.7 million primarily due to higher proportion of profit earned from RBFS. The lower revenue from RB Logistics resulted in a similar magnitude of decrease in ancillary and logistical service expenses.
Share repurchase program
On May 9, 2019, we announced a share repurchase program for the repurchase of up to $100 million worth of our common shares, approved by the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”), over a period of 12 months, ending May 8, 2020.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we executed the following share repurchases at a total cost of $42.0 million.
Issuer purchases of equity securities
(d) Maximum
(c) Total number of
approximate dollar
shares purchased as
value of shares that
(a) Total number of shares
(b) Average price paid
part of publicly
may yet be purchased
purchased
per share
announced program
under the program
May 23-31, 2019
387,480
33.49
87.0 million
June 1-21, 2019
836,194
34.71
58.0 million
1,223,674
34.32
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of liquidity are our cash provided by operating activities and borrowings from our revolving credit facilities. We believe our existing working capital and availability under our credit facilities are sufficient to satisfy our present operating requirements and contractual obligations (detailed below), as well as to fund future growth, including but not limited to, mergers and acquisitions, development of our A&M, RBFS, and Mascus operating segments, as well as other growth opportunities.
We assess our liquidity based on our ability to generate cash to fund operating, investing, and financing activities. Our liquidity is primarily affected by fluctuations in cash provided by operating activities, payment of dividends, voluntary repayments of term debt, share repurchases, our net capital spending1, and significant acquisitions of businesses.
Cash provided by operating activities can fluctuate significantly from period to period due to factors such as differences in the timing, size and number of auctions during the period, the volume of our inventory contracts, the timing of the receipt of auction proceeds from buyers and of the payment of net amounts due to consignors, as well as the location of the auction with respect to restrictions on the use of cash generated therein.
Cash flows
Cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities
332,793
144,280
147,568
Investing activities
(36,057)
(30,953)
(710,954)
(96)
Financing activities
(187,218)
(134,107)
119,263
(212)
Effect of changes in foreign currency rates
5,171
(4,769)
17,150
208
(128)
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
114,689
(25,549)
(426,973)
549
(94)
Cash provided by operating activities increased $188.5 million in 2019. This increase was primarily due to a net positive impact from changes in our operating assets and liabilities, which was driven by our reduction in inventory and an increase in the size of auctions that transacted in the US at the end of 2019 compared to the end of 2018. The increase in our net income in 2019 also contributed to the increase in cash provided by operating activities.
Net cash used in investing activities increased $5.1 million in 2019. This increase was primarily due to net $10.8 million less proceeds on the sale of assets, with $6.1 million on the sale of an equity accounted for investment in Q3 2018 and $4.7 million fewer proceeds on the sale of property, plant and equipment in 2019 compared to 2018. This was partially offset by a $4.7 million acquisition of Leake Auction Company in Q1 2018, as well as $3.3 million less cash spent on property, plant and equipment additions in 2019 compared to 2018.
Net cash used in financing activities increased $53.1 million in 2019. This increase was driven primarily by our $42.0 million share repurchase in Q2 2019, a $28.6 million increase in the net repayment of short-term debt in 2019, and a $6.9 million increase in dividend payments in 2019. The increase was partially offset by $17.3 million fewer voluntary term debt repayments and a $12.6 million increase in cash raised from the issuance of share capital related to stock option exercises in 2019. The latter included the exercise of stock options by our former CEO in Q4 2019.
Dividend information
We declared and paid regular cash dividends of $0.18 per common share for the quarters ended December 31, 2018 and March 31, 2019. We declared and paid regular cash dividends of $0.20 per common share for the quarters ended June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019. We have declared, but not yet paid, a dividend of $0.20 per common share for the quarter ended December 31, 2019. All dividends we pay are “eligible dividends” for Canadian income tax purposes unless indicated otherwise.
Our dividend payout ratio, which we calculate as dividends paid to stockholders divided by net income attributable to stockholders, decreased to 55.4% in 2019 from 62.3% in 2018. This decrease was primarily due to the increase in net income attributable to stockholders over the comparative period. Our adjusted dividend payout ratio (non-GAAP measure) decreased to 56.7% in 2019 from 64.3% in 2018.
Return on average invested capital
Our return on average invested capital is calculated as net income attributable to stockholders divided by our average invested capital. We calculate average invested capital over a trailing 12-month period by adding the average long-term debt over that period to the average stockholders’ equity over that period.
Return on average invested capital increased 170 bps to 9.6% in 2019 from 7.9% in 2018. This increase is primarily due to a $27.5 million, or 23%, increase in net income attributable to stockholders over the comparative period, combined with the impact of $62.7 million in voluntary debt repayments on average invested capital during 2019. Return on invested capital (“ROIC”) (non-GAAP measure) increased 180 bps to 9.4% in 2019 from 7.6% in 2018.
Credit facilities
Credit facilities at December 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:
Committed
Term loan facility
155,355
224,581
-31
Revolving credit facilities
500,000
Total credit facilities
655,355
724,581
-10
Unused
489,937
467,801
Total credit facilities unused
At December 31, 2019, of the remaining $500.0 million in committed, revolving credit facilities, $490.0 million relates to our syndicated credit facility and $10.0 million relates to credit facilities in certain foreign jurisdictions.
On December 31, 2019, we had $489.9 million of unused committed revolving credit facilities, which consisted of:
Borrowings under our Credit Agreement bear floating rates of interest, which, at our option, are based on either a base rate (or Canadian prime rate for certain Canadian dollar borrowings) or LIBOR (or such floating rate customarily used by the syndicate for currencies other than U.S. dollars). In either case, an applicable margin is added to the rate. The applicable margin ranges from 0.25% to 1.50% for base rate loans, and 1.25% to 2.50% for LIBOR (or the equivalent of such currency) loans, depending on our leverage ratio at the time of borrowing.
As at December 31, 2019, we also had $10.0 million in credit facilities in certain foreign jurisdictions including a $5.0 million revolving credit facility expiring on October 27, 2021 and a demand facility that has no maturity date.
During 2019, we made voluntary prepayments totalling $62.7 million on the term loan denominated in U.S. dollars. Prepayments are applied against future scheduled mandatory payments. The amount available pursuant to the term loan facility was only available to finance the Acquisition and is not available for other corporate purposes upon repayment of amounts borrowed under that facility.
Senior unsecured notes
At December 31, 2019, we had senior unsecured notes (the “Notes”) outstanding that expire on January 15, 2025 for an aggregate principal amount of $500.0 million, bearing an interest rate of 5.375% per annum. The proceeds of the offering of the Notes were used to finance the Acquisition. The Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on an unsecured basis, subject to certain exceptions, by each of our subsidiaries that is a borrower or guarantees indebtedness under the Credit Agreement.
Debt covenants
The Credit Agreement contains certain covenants that could limit the ability of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries to, among other things and subject to certain significant exceptions: (i) incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness; (ii) declare or pay dividends or make other distributions with respect to, or purchase or otherwise acquire or retire for value, equity interests; (iii) make loans, advances or other investments; (iv) incur liens; (v) sell or otherwise dispose of assets; and (vi) enter into transactions with affiliates. The Credit Agreement also provides for certain events of default, which, if any of them occurs, would permit or require the principal, premium, if any, interest and any other monetary obligations on all the then outstanding amounts under the Credit Agreement to be declared immediately due and payable.
The Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture, dated December 21, 2016, with U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Indenture”). The Indenture contains covenants that limit our ability, and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to, among other things and subject to certain significant exceptions: (i) incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness; (ii) declare or pay dividends or make other distributions with respect to, or purchase or otherwise acquire or retire for value, equity interests; (iii) make any principal payment on, or redeem or repurchase, subordinated debt; (iv) make loans, advances or other investments; (v) incur liens; (vi) sell or otherwise dispose of assets; and (vii) enter into transactions with affiliates. The Indenture also provides for certain events of default, which, if any of them occurs, would permit or require the principal, premium, if any, interest and any other monetary obligations on all the then outstanding Notes under the applicable indenture to be declared immediately due and payable.
At inception of the Credit Agreement and the Indenture, all parties anticipated the increase in indebtedness that followed the Acquisition. As such, covenants pertaining to our leverage ratio provide for a six-quarter expansion of debt levels, after which the leverage ratio settles to a moderately higher tier than pre-Acquisition conditions.
We were in compliance with all financial and other covenants applicable to our credit facilities at December 31, 2019.
Contractual obligations at December 31, 2019
Payments due by period
Less than
1 to 3
3 to 5
More than
(in U.S. $000's)
1 year
years
5 years
Long-term debt obligations:
Principal
655,356
18,277
137,079
Capital lease obligations
25,522
8,369
12,174
4,905
74
Operating lease obligations
167,397
16,051
25,912
19,499
105,935
Purchase obligations
6,295
Share unit liabilities
5,130
Other non-current liabilities
2,963
2,843
Total contractual obligations
862,663
54,122
175,265
24,424
608,852
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, financial performance, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Critical Accounting Policies, Judgments, Estimates and Assumptions
In preparing our consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP, we must make decisions that impact the reported amounts and related disclosures. Such decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In reaching such decisions, we apply judgments based on our understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances and historical experience. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate these judgments and estimates, including:
Actual amounts could differ materially from those estimated by us at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared.
The following discussion of critical accounting policies and estimates is intended to supplement the significant accounting policies presented in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in “Part II, Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” presented in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which summarize the accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of those consolidated financial statements. The policies and the estimates discussed below are included here because they require more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation and presentation of our consolidated financial statements than other policies and estimates.
Valuation of equity-classified share units
We measure the fair value of equity-classified shares units as of the grant date. We calculate the fair value of stock options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We calculate the fair value of share units without market conditions on the grant date based on the Company’s share price. We determine the fair value of share units with market conditions using the Monte Carlo simulation model. The fair value of awards expected to vest is expensed over the respective remaining service period, with the corresponding increase to APIC recorded in equity. Estimating fair value for share-based payment transactions requires determination of the most appropriate valuation model, which is dependent on the terms and conditions of the grant. This estimate may require determination of the most appropriate inputs to the valuation model, including the expected life of the share units or stock options, volatility and dividend yield, as well as making assumptions about them.
Recoverability of goodwill
We perform impairment tests on goodwill on an annual basis in accordance with US GAAP, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that those assets might be impaired. Goodwill is tested for impairment at a reporting unit level, which is at the same level or one level below an operating segment. We determined our reporting units to be at the same level as our operating segments for A&M and Mascus.
On January 1, 2017, we early adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), which eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under ASU 2017-04, we still have the option of performing a qualitative assessment of a reporting unit to first determine whether the quantitative impairment test is necessary. We exercise judgment in performing our qualitative assessment of whether indicators of impairment exist.
When we determine that an annual or interim quantitative impairment test is necessary, we now only perform one step to identify potential impairment, which is to compare the reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The reporting unit’s fair value is determined using various valuation approaches and techniques that involve assumptions based on what we believe a hypothetical marketplace participant would use in estimating fair value on the measurement date. An impairment loss is recognized as the difference between the reporting unit’s carrying amount and its fair value to the extent the difference does not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.
We measure the fair value of our reporting units using an earnings valuation approach, which employs a discounted cash flow valuation technique. In applying this valuation approach, management is required to make significant estimates and assumptions about the timing and amount of future cash flows, revenue growth rates, and discount rates, which requires a significant amount of judgment. Accordingly, actual results may differ from those used in the goodwill impairment test.
A&M reporting unit goodwill
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we performed a qualitative assessment of the A&M reporting unit and we concluded there were no indicators of impairment that existed.
Mascus reporting unit goodwill
Goodwill arising from the acquisition of Mascus forms part of the reporting unit on December 31, 2019, and we performed the US GAAP goodwill impairment test. Using the cash flow methodology of the earnings approach, the fair value of the Mascus reporting unit was measured based on the present value of the cash flows that we expect the reporting unit to generate. In determining our future cash flows, we estimated an annual revenue growth rate ranging between 6% to 8% and an operating margin ranging between 36% to 44% from 2020 to 2024. We estimated a discount rate of 12% reflecting the risk premium on this reporting unit, and a terminal growth rate of 3.5% for the period beyond five years. As the fair value of the Mascus reporting unit was greater than its carrying amount, management concluded that Mascus goodwill was not impaired at December 31, 2019.
Recoverability of indefinite-lived intangible assets
We perform impairment tests on indefinite-lived intangible assets, which includes trade names and trademarks, on an annual basis in accordance with US GAAP, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that those assets might be impaired. Indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment testing involves determination of the unit of accounting, which we determined to be at the same level as our operating segments for A&M and Mascus. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we determined that there were no indicators of impairment for the indefinite-lived intangible assets under our A&M and Mascus reporting units.
Accounting for income taxes
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on temporary differences (differences between the accounting basis and the tax basis of the assets and liabilities) and non-capital loss, capital loss, and tax credit carry-forwards are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws expected to apply when these differences reverse. Deferred tax benefits, including non-capital loss, capital loss, and tax credits carry-forwards, are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is considered more likely than not.
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions are recorded based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. We regularly assess the potential outcomes of examinations by tax authorities in determining the adequacy of our provision for income taxes. We also continually assess the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and adjust the income tax provision, income taxes payable and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.
Topic 606 Adoption
Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted Topic 606 using the full retrospective method. The primary impact of the adoption of Topic 606 is the change in the presentation of revenue earned from inventory sales and ancillary and logistical services. These revenues are presented gross of the related expenses rather than net. There was no impact on the timing of revenues recognized, amount of operating income or net income, or on the consolidated balance sheet or consolidated statements of cash flows due to the adoption of Topic 606. Prior periods presented have been restated to conform with this new revenue standard.
The following table reconciles revenues as previously reported to total revenues under Topic 606:
Prior to January 1, 2018
New Revenue Standard Adjustments
On and after January 1, 2018
Revenues as previously
Ancillary and logistical
Total revenues under the
reported (a)
Cost of inventory sold1 (b)
service expenses2 (c)
new standard (a)+(b)+(c)=(d)
Quarter ended:
December 31, 2017
178,785
98,895
14,070
291,750
September 30, 2017
141,047
72,476
13,878
227,401
June 30, 2017
166,186
71,726
14,701
252,613
March 31, 2017
124,499
63,401
11,527
199,427
Full year 2017
610,517
The following table reconciles cost of services as previously reported to cost of services under Topic 606:
Ancillary and logistical service
Costs of services under the
Costs of services (a)
expenses2 (b)
new standard (a) + (b) = (c)
25,026
39,096
19,583
33,461
21,591
36,292
12,813
24,340
For further details on Topic 606, refer to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2017, and December 31, 2018 and the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 31, 2018, June 30, 2018, and September 30, 2018.
Topic 842 Adoption
Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted Topic 842, which requires lessees to recognize almost all leases, including operating leases, on the balance sheet through a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability. We utilized the optional transition approach, which permits us to apply the new lease standards at the adoption date.
On adoption of the new standard, we recognized a right-of-use asset relating to operating leases of $103,897,000 with a corresponding increase in operating lease liability. Offsetting the increase in the ROU asset recognized was the reclassification of a deferred rent liability from other non-current liability to ROU asset of $5,752,000. There was no impact on retained earnings or cash flows.
The adoption of the standard had no impact on our debt-covenant compliance under our current agreements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent accounting pronouncements that significantly impact our accounting policies or the presentation of our consolidated financial position or performance have been disclosed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements included in “Part II, Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” presented elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
45
We reference various non-GAAP measures throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These measures do not have a standardized meaning and are, therefore, unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The presentation of this financial information, which is not prepared under any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles, is not intended to be considered in isolation of, or as a substitute for, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Non-GAAP financial measures referred to in this report are labeled as “non-GAAP measure” or designated as such with an asterisk (*).
Adjusted Operating Income* Reconciliation
Adjusting operating income* eliminates the financial impact of adjusting items which are significant non-recurring items that we do not consider to be part of our normal operating results, such as acquisition-related costs, management reorganization costs, and certain other items, which we refer to as ‘adjusting items’. We believe that comparing adjusted operating income* for different financial periods provides useful information about the growth or decline of our operating income for the relevant financial period.
The following table reconciles adjusted operating income to operating income, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure in our consolidated income statements.
Pre-tax adjusting items:
Share-based payment recovery
(4,078)
-100
Accelerated vesting of assumed options
4,752
Acquisition and finance structure advisory
9,063
Severance and retention
1,501
3,613
-58
Adjusted operating income*
219,124
186,690
133,793
Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Stockholders* and Diluted Adjusted EPS Attributable to Stockholders* Reconciliation
We believe that adjusted net income attributable to stockholders* provides useful information about the growth or decline of our net income attributable to stockholders for the relevant financial period and eliminates the financial impact of adjusting items we do not consider to be part of our normal operating results. Diluted Adjusted EPS attributable to stockholders* eliminates the financial impact of adjusting items which are after-tax effects of significant non-recurring items that we do not consider to be part of our normal operating results, such as acquisition-related costs, management reorganization costs, and certain other items, which we refer to as ‘adjusting items’.
The following table reconciles adjusted net income attributable to stockholders* and diluted adjusted EPS attributable to stockholders* to net income attributable to stockholders and diluted EPS attributable to stockholders, which are the most directly comparable GAAP measures in our consolidated income statements.
(in U.S. $000's, except share and
per share data, and percentages)
Gain on sale of equity accounted for investment
(4,935)
Current income tax effect of adjusting items:
(2,447)
(376)
(748)
-50
Deferred income tax effect of adjusting items:
688
(2,361)
(368)
Current income tax adjusting item:
Change in uncertain tax provision
2,290
Deferred tax adjusting item:
Remeasurement of deferred taxes
(10,070)
Weighted average number of dilutive shares outstanding
109,759,123
109,388,236
108,113,151
Operating Free Cash Flow* (“OFCF”) Reconciliation
We believe OFCF*, when compared on a trailing 12-month basis to different financial periods provides an effective measure of the cash generated by our business and provides useful information regarding cash flows remaining for discretionary return to stockholders, mergers and acquisitions, or debt reduction. Our balance sheet scorecard includes OFCF* as a performance metric. OFCF* is also an element of the performance criteria for certain annual short-term and long-term incentive awards.
The following table reconciles OFCF* to cash provided by operating activities, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure in, or calculated from, our consolidated statements of cash flows:
(in U.S. $ millions, except percentages)
Cash provided by operating activities
332.8
144.3
147.6
-2
Property, plant and equipment additions
13.6
10.8
-20
56
Intangible asset additions
27.4
26.1
28.6
-9
Proceeds on disposition of property plant and equipment
(5.9)
(10.6)
(5.0)
-44
112
35.1
32.4
34.4
-6
OFCF*
297.7
111.9
113.2
166
-1
Adjusted EBITDA*
We believe adjusted EBITDA* provides useful information about the growth or decline of our net income when compared between different financial periods.
The following table reconciles adjusted EBITDA* to net income, which is the most directly comparable GAAP measure in, or calculated from, our consolidated income statements:
121,506
75,306
Add: depreciation and amortization expenses
70,501
66,614
52,694
Add: interest expense
41,277
44,527
38,291
-7
Less: interest income
(3,802)
(2,888)
(3,194)
Add: income tax expense
41,623
31,006
2,088
1,385
294,661
257,331
191,524
Adjusted Net Debt* and Adjusted Net Debt/Adjusted EBITDA* Reconciliation
We believe that comparing adjusted net debt/adjusted EBITDA* on a trailing 12-month basis for different financial periods provides useful information about the performance of our operations as an indicator of the amount of time it would take us to settle both our short and long-term debt. We do not consider this to be a measure of our liquidity, which is our ability to settle only short-term obligations, but rather a measure of how well we fund liquidity. Measures of liquidity are noted under “Liquidity and Capital Resources”.
The following table reconciles adjusted net debt* to debt, adjusted EBITDA* to net income, and adjusted net debt*/adjusted EBITDA* to debt/ net income, respectively, which are the most directly comparable GAAP measures in, or calculated from, our consolidated financial statements.
(in U.S. $millions, except percentages)
Short-term debt
4.7
19.9
7.0
-76
184
645.5
711.3
812.9
-12
Debt
650.2
731.2
819.9
-11
Less: cash and cash equivalents
(359.7)
(237.7)
(267.9)
51
Adjusted net debt*
290.5
493.5
552.0
-41
121.5
75.3
70.5
66.6
52.7
41.3
44.5
38.3
(3.8)
(2.9)
(3.2)
41.6
31.0
2.1
1,376
(4.1)
4.8
9.1
1.5
3.6
(4.9)
8.9
294.6
257.3
191.6
Debt/net income
4.4
x
10.9
-43
-45
Adjusted net debt*/adjusted EBITDA*
1.9
2.9
-47
-34
49
Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Stockholders* and Adjusted Dividend Payout Ratio* Reconciliation
We believe that adjusted net income attributable to stockholders* provides useful information about the growth or decline of our net income attributable to stockholders for the relevant financial period and eliminates the financial impact of adjusting items we do not consider to be part of our normal operating results. We believe that disclosing our adjusted dividend payout ratio* for different financial periods provides useful information about how well our net income supports our dividend payments.
The following table reconciles adjusted net income attributable to stockholders* and adjusted dividend payout ratio* to net income attributable to stockholders, and dividend payout ratio, which are the most directly comparable GAAP measures in, or calculated from, our consolidated financial statements:
Dividends paid to stockholders
82.5
75.7
72.8
149.0
75.0
(2.4)
(0.4)
(0.7)
0.7
2.3
(10.1)
145.6
117.7
87.7
Dividend payout ratio
55.4
62.3
97.1
-690 bps
-3480 bps
Adjusted dividend payout ratio*
56.7
83.0
-760 bps
-1870 bps
Adjusted Net Income Attributable to Stockholders* and ROIC* Reconciliation
We believe that comparing ROIC on a trailing 12-month basis for different financial periods, provides useful information about the after-tax return generated by our investments.
The following table reconciles adjusted net income attributable to stockholders* and ROIC* to net income attributable to stockholders and return on average invested capital which are the most directly comparable GAAP measures in, or calculated from, our consolidated financial statements:
Opening long-term debt
595.7
Ending long-term debt
Average long-term debt
678.4
762.1
704.3
Opening stockholders' equity
830.6
739.7
687.1
Ending stockholders' equity
901.8
Average stockholders' equity
866.2
785.2
713.4
Average invested capital
1,544.7
1,547.3
1,417.7
9.6
7.9
5.3
170 bps
260 bps
ROIC*
9.4
7.6
6.2
180 bps
140 bps
Adjusting items for the year ended December 31, 2019:
Recognized in the fourth quarter of 2019
Recognized in the third quarter of 2019
Recognized in the second quarter of 2019
Recognized in the first quarter of 2019
Adjusting items for the year ended December 31, 2018:
Recognized in the fourth quarter of 2018
Recognized in the third quarter of 2018
Recognized in the second quarter of 2018
Recognized in the first quarter of 2018
Adjusting items for the year ended December 31, 2017:
Recognized in the fourth quarter of 2017
Recognized in the third quarter of 2017
Recognized in the second quarter of 2017
Recognized in the first quarter of 2017
ITEM 7A: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We conduct operations in local currencies in countries around the world, but we use the U.S. dollar as our presentation currency. As a result, we are exposed to currency fluctuations and exchange rate risk. We cannot accurately predict the future effects of foreign currency fluctuations on our financial condition or results of operations, or quantify their effects on the macroeconomic environment. The proportion of revenues denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar in a given period will differ from the annual proportion for the year ended December 31, 2019, which was 42%, depending on the size and location of auctions held during the period. On an annual basis, we expect fluctuations in revenues and operating expenses to largely offset and generally act as a natural hedge against exposure to fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar.
During 2019, we recorded a net decrease in our foreign currency translation adjustment balance of $2.9 million, compared to a net decrease of $13.8 million in 2018 and a net increase of $24.6 million in 2017. Our foreign currency translation adjustment arises from the translation of our net assets denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar to the U.S. dollar for reporting purposes. Based on our exposures to foreign currency transactions as at December 31, 2019, and assuming all other variables remain constant, a 10% appreciation or depreciation of the Canadian dollar and Euro against the U.S. dollar would result in an increase/decrease of approximately $28.4 million in our consolidated comprehensive income, of which $26.8 million relates to our foreign currency translation adjustment and $1.6 million to our net income.
Interest Rate Risk
Loans under our syndicated and foreign credit facilities, bear interest, at our option, at a rate equal to either a base rate (or Canadian prime rate for certain Canadian dollar borrowings) or LIBOR (or such floating rate customarily used by the syndicate for currencies other than U.S. dollars). In either case, an applicable margin is added to the rate. As at December 31, 2019, we had a total of $159.3 million in loans (short-term facilities drawn and term loans) bearing floating rates of interest, as compared to $242.1 million at December 31, 2018. Based on the amount owing as at December 31, 2019, and assuming all other variables remain constant, a change in the interest rate by 100 bps would result in an increase/decrease of approximately $1.6 million in the pre-tax interest we accrue per annum.
Our exposure to interest rate risk decreased at December 31, 2019 compared to December 31, 2018, primarily due to the repayment of $76.3 million of term loans during 2019. The Notes of US $500.0 million, which represent 76% of our long-term debt, bear interest at a fixed rate of 5.375% per annum. The proportion of fixed-to-floating interest rates is expected to increase as we make the required principal repayments on our term loans and execute on our debt management strategies. We continue to monitor our exposure to interest rate risk, and while we have not adopted a long-term hedging strategy to protect against interest rate fluctuations associated with our variable rate debt, we may consider hedging specific borrowings if we deem it appropriate in the future.
Inflation
Although we cannot accurately anticipate the future effect of inflation on our financial condition or results of operations, inflation historically has not had a material impact on our operations.
ITEM 8: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The following financial statements and supplementary data should be read in conjunction with “Part II, Item 6: Selected Financial Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (the “Company“) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements“). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with US generally accepted accounting principles.
Adoption of New Accounting Standard
As discussed in Note 2(y) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method for accounting for leases in 2019.
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated February 27, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company‘s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company‘s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the US federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Valuation and existence of surplus government inventory
Description of the Matter
At December 31, 2019 the Company’s inventory balance is $65 million. As explained in Note 2(m) to the consolidated financial statements, inventory is valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Charges for inventory shrinkage, as well as for inventory written down to expected market price, are included in costs of goods sold in the period in which they have been determined to occur. The Company’s inventory balance includes non-rolling stock inventory the Company has purchased for resale as part of its commitment to purchase certain surplus government property under the non-rolling stock surplus contract described in Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements.
Auditing the valuation and existence of the government surplus inventory involved significant auditor judgement, as the large volume of units of surplus government property acquired under the non-rolling stock program requires the Company to make an estimate of inventory shrinkage that is based on newly implemented processes for determining on-hand inventory quantities for this type of inventory. Auditing inventory quantities involved especially challenging auditor judgement due to the nature and extent of audit effort required to address the unpredictability in the timing of receipt of inventory under the related contract as well as the uniqueness of the inventory. Further, the Company’s estimate of net realizable value can fluctuate based on factors such as future demand and supply and forecasted profit margin, which are subject to estimation uncertainty due to the Company having limited history of purchasing and selling government surplus inventory.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of internal controls over the Company's process to determine the valuation and existence of the government surplus inventory. This included controls over the Company’s review of the significant assumptions and data underlying the estimates for inventory shrinkage and net realizable value as well as the Company’s inventory counts and reconciliation controls to verify existence of inventory.
We performed substantive audit procedures to address existence of inventory and inventory shrinkage that included, among others, observing and evaluating management’s inventory count procedures and performing inventory test counts and tracing our test count results to the Company’s inventory compilation and testing a sample of the shipping and receiving activity from the inventory count date to December 31, 2019.
We also performed substantive audit procedures to address the estimate of net realizable value that included, among others, evaluating management’s analysis including the retrospective review of historical gross margins, testing the accuracy and completeness of the underlying data used in this analysis, and testing subsequent sales of inventory items on-hand at year end to evaluate the completeness of the estimate.
Valuation of Goodwill related to the Mascus reporting unit
At December 31, 2019, the Company’s goodwill related to Mascus was $20 million. As discussed in Note 2(r) to the consolidated financial statements, goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. The Company’s goodwill is further described in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.
Auditing management’s annual goodwill impairment test related to the Mascus reporting unit involved subjective auditor judgment due to the significant estimation uncertainly in determining the fair value of the reporting unit. The fair value estimate was made using a discounted cash flow model. Significant judgment was required in assessing the assumptions used, in particular projected revenue growth rates, the terminal growth rate and projected earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) margins and the discount rate.
55
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s goodwill impairment review, including controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions described above.
Our substantive procedures to test the Company’s estimated fair value of the Mascus reporting unit, included, among others, assessing methodologies and testing the significant assumptions discussed above and the underlying data used by the Company in its analysis. We assessed the projected revenue growth rates, terminal growth rates and EBITDA margins used by management by comparing them to current economic and industry trends. We assessed the historical accuracy of the Company’s projections for revenue growth rates and EBITDA margins by comparing them to actual operating results. We performed sensitivity analysis of significant assumptions discussed above to evaluate the potential changes in the fair value of the reporting unit that would result from changes in the assumptions. We also involved our valuation specialists to assist in the review of the valuation methodology as well as the appropriateness of the discount rates used.
/s/Ernst & Young LLP
Chartered Professional Accountants
We have served as the Company‘s auditor since 2013.
Vancouver, Canada
February 27, 2020
Consolidated Income Statements
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share data)
Revenue:
Operating expenses:
Acquisition-related costs
777
5,093
38,272
Depreciation and amortization expenses
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment
(1,107)
(2,731)
(1,656)
Foreign exchange (gain) loss
(2,937)
2,559
Total operating expenses
Interest expense
(41,277)
(44,527)
(38,291)
Other income, net
8,838
11,850
8,231
Income tax expense (recovery):
Current income tax
32,797
24,767
19,356
Deferred income tax
8,826
6,239
(17,268)
Net income attributable to:
Stockholders
Non-controlling interests
101
279
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
108,519,739
108,063,349
107,044,348
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
57
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(2,836)
(13,792)
24,670
Total comprehensive income
146,304
107,714
99,976
Total comprehensive income attributable to:
146,217
107,716
99,639
87
337
58
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share data)
As at December 31,
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
359,671
237,744
Restricted cash
60,585
67,823
Trade and other receivables
137,402
129,257
Inventory
64,956
113,294
Other current assets
50,160
49,055
Income taxes receivable
6,810
6,365
Total current assets
679,584
603,538
Property, plant and equipment
484,482
486,599
Other non-current assets
145,679
29,395
Intangible assets
233,380
245,622
Goodwill
672,310
671,594
Deferred tax assets
13,995
15,648
2,052,396
Liabilities and Equity
Auction proceeds payable
276,188
203,503
Trade and other payables
194,279
201,255
Income taxes payable
7,809
2,312
4,705
19,896
Current portion of long-term debt
13,126
Total current liabilities
501,258
440,092
627,204
698,172
151,238
41,980
Deferred tax liabilities
42,743
35,519
Total liabilities
1,322,443
1,215,763
Commitments
Contingencies
Contingently redeemable performance share units
923
Stockholders' equity:
Share capital:
Common stock; no par value, unlimited shares authorized, issued and outstanding shares: 109,337,781 (December 31, 2018: 108,682,030)
194,771
181,780
Additional paid-in capital
52,110
56,885
Retained earnings
714,051
648,255
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(59,099)
(56,277)
Non-controlling interest
5,154
5,067
Total stockholders' equity
906,987
835,710
Total liabilities and equity
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except where noted)
Attributable to stockholders
Contingently
Additional
Accumulated
Non-
redeemable
Common stock
paid-In
other
controlling
performance
Number of
capital
Retained
comprehensive
interest
share units
shares
Amount
("APIC")
earnings
loss
("NCI")
equity
("PSUs")
Balance, December 31, 2016
106,822,001
125,474
27,638
601,071
(67,126)
4,773
691,830
3,950
Other comprehensive income
24,612
Change in value of contingently redeemable NCI
Stock option exercises
444,571
13,017
(3,081)
9,936
Stock option compensation expense
13,700
Assumption of stock options on acquisition of IronPlanet
2,330
Settlement of equity-classified PSUs
3,211
(172)
Modification of PSUs
(382)
1,803
Equity-classified share units expense
340
3,189
Equity-classified share units dividend equivalents
78
(227)
(149)
149
Change in value of contingently redeemable equity-classified PSUs
(95)
Cash dividends paid
(72,785)
(41)
(72,826)
Balance, December 31, 2017
107,269,783
138,582
41,005
602,609
(42,514)
5,069
744,751
9,014
(13,763)
(29)
1,235,154
37,308
(8,784)
28,524
Issuance of common stock related to vesting of share units
177,093
5,890
(1,662)
(326)
3,902
(7,803)
8,252
12,365
958
13,323
(6,622)
5,384
5,872
325
(678)
(353)
353
Change in fair value of contingently redeemable PSUs
(109)
109
(75,678)
Balance, December 31, 2018
108,682,030
Other comprehensive loss
(2,822)
(14)
1,672,022
49,117
(8,023)
41,094
207,403
5,886
(10,064)
(4,177)
(1,083)
4,697
7,933
682
(709)
(27)
(82,535)
Shares repurchased
(1,223,674)
(42,012)
Balance, December 31, 2019
109,337,781
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Operating activities:
Adjustments for items not affecting cash:
8,047
11,256
3,529
Deferred income tax expense (recovery)
Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss
(3,058)
951
254
Amortization of debt issuance costs
4,086
4,995
3,056
Gain on disposition of equity investment
Amortization of right-of-use assets
12,280
Other, net
2,779
(2,317)
(1,237)
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities
76,602
(65,550)
10,279
Net cash provided by operating activities
Investing activities:
Acquisition of IronPlanet, net of cash acquired
(675,851)
(13,589)
(16,860)
(10,812)
(27,415)
(26,152)
(28,584)
Proceeds on disposition of property, plant and equipment
5,929
10,586
4,985
Proceeds on disposal of equity investment
6,147
(982)
(4,674)
(692)
Net cash used in investing activities
Financing activities:
Share repurchase
Dividends paid to NCI
Issuances of share capital
Payment of withholding taxes on issuance of shares
(5,260)
(3,901)
Proceeds from short-term debt
13,169
19,715
6,971
Repayment of short-term debt
(28,684)
(6,628)
(24,479)
Proceeds from long-term debt
325,000
Repayment of long-term debt
(76,282)
(91,013)
(108,985)
Debt issue costs
(12,624)
Repayment of finance lease obligations
(6,708)
(3,950)
(2,322)
(1,176)
(1,408)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Effect of changes in foreign currency rates on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
Increase (decrease)
Beginning of period
305,567
331,116
758,089
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period
420,256
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except where noted)
1. General information
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the “Company”) provide global asset management and disposition services, offering customers end-to-end solutions for buying and selling used industrial equipment and other durable assets through its unreserved live on site auctions, online marketplaces, listing services, and private brokerage services. Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated is a company incorporated in Canada under the Canada Business Corporations Act, whose shares are publicly traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange (“TSX”) and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).
2. Significant accounting policies
(a) Basis of preparation
These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) and the following accounting policies have been consistently applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
(b) Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and non-wholly owned subsidiaries in which the Company has a controlling financial interest either through voting rights or means other than voting rights. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation. Where the Company’s ownership interest in a consolidated subsidiary is less than 100%, the non-controlling interests’ share of these non-wholly owned subsidiaries is reported in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as a separate component of equity or within temporary equity. The non-controlling interests’ share of the net income of these non-wholly owned subsidiaries is reported in the Company’s consolidated income statements as a deduction from the Company’s net earnings to arrive at net income attributable to stockholders of the Company.
Investments in entities that the Company has the ability to exercise significant influence over, but not control, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, investments are stated at initial costs and are adjusted for subsequent additional investments and the Company's share of earnings or losses and distributions.
The Company consolidates variable interest entities (“VIEs”) if the Company has (a) the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. For VIEs where the Company has shared power with unrelated parties, the Company uses the equity method of accounting to report their results. The determination of the primary beneficiary involves judgment.
(c) Revenue recognition
Revenues are comprised of:
2. Significant accounting policies (continued)
(c) Revenue recognition (continued)
The Company recognizes revenue when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to our customers, or upon completion of the performance obligation, in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, the performance obligation is satisfied. For live event-based auctions or online auctions, revenue is recognized when the auction sale is complete and the Company has determined that the sale proceeds are collectible. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable and is shown net of value-added tax and duties.
Service revenues
Commissions from sales at the Company’s auctions represent the percentage earned by the Company on the gross proceeds from equipment and other assets sold at auction. The majority of the Company’s commissions are earned as a pre-negotiated fixed rate of the gross selling price. Other commissions from sales at the Company’s auctions are earned from underwritten commission contracts, when the Company guarantees a certain level of proceeds to a consignor.
The Company accepts equipment and other assets on consignment stimulating buyer interest through professional marketing techniques and matches sellers (also known as consignors) to buyers through the auction or private sale process. Prior to offering an item for sale on its online marketplaces, the Company also performs inspections.
Following the sale of the item, the Company invoices the buyer for the purchase price of the asset, taxes, and, if applicable, the buyer transaction fee, collects payment from the buyer, and remits the proceeds to the seller, net of the seller commissions, applicable taxes, and applicable fees. Commissions are calculated as a percentage of the hammer price of the property sold at auction. Fees are also charged to sellers for listing and inspecting equipment. Other revenue earned in the process of conducting the Company’s auctions include administrative, documentation, and advertising fees.
On the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer, the highest bidder becomes legally obligated to pay the full purchase price, which is the hammer price of the property purchased and the seller is legally obligated to relinquish the property in exchange for the hammer price less any seller’s commissions. Commission and fee revenue are recognized on the date of the auction sale upon the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer.
Under the standard terms and conditions of its auction sales, the Company is not obligated to pay a consignor for property that has not been paid for by the buyer, provided the property has not been released to the buyer. If the buyer defaults on its payment obligation, also referred to as a collapsed sale, the sale is cancelled in the period in which the determination is made, and the property is returned to the consignor or placed in a later event-based or online auction. Historically cancelled sales have not been material.
Online marketplace commission revenue is reduced by a provision for disputes, which is an estimate of disputed items that are expected to be settled at a cost to the Company, related to settlements of discrepancies under the Company’s equipment condition certification program. The equipment condition certification refers to a written inspection report provided to potential buyers that reflects the condition of a specific piece of equipment offered for sale, and includes ratings, comments, and photographs of the equipment following inspection by one of the Company’s equipment inspectors.
Service revenues (continued)
The equipment condition certification provides that a buyer may file a written dispute claim during an eligible dispute period for consideration and resolution at the sole determination of the Company if the purchased equipment is not substantially in the condition represented in the inspection report. Typically disputes under the equipment condition certification program are settled with minor repairs or additional services, such as washing or detailing the item; the estimated costs of such items or services are included in the provision for disputes.
Commission revenue are recorded net of commissions owed to third parties, which are principally the result of situations when the commission is shared with a consignor in an auction guarantee risk and reward sharing arrangement.
Underwritten commission contracts can take the form of guarantee contracts. Guarantee contracts typically include a pre-negotiated percentage of the guaranteed gross proceeds plus a percentage of proceeds in excess of the guaranteed amount. If actual auction proceeds are less than the guaranteed amount, commission is reduced; if proceeds are sufficiently lower, the Company can incur a loss on the sale. Losses, if any, resulting from guarantee contracts are recorded in the period in which the relevant auction is completed. If a loss relating to a guarantee contract held at the period end to be sold after the period end is known or is probable and estimable at the financial statement reporting date, the loss is accrued in the financial statements for that period. The Company’s exposure from these guarantee contracts fluctuates over time.
Other services revenue also includes fees for refurbishment, logistical services, financing, appraisal fees and other ancillary service fees. Fees are recognized in the period in which the service is provided to the customer.
Underwritten commission contracts can take the form of inventory contracts. Revenue related to inventory contracts is recognized in the period in which the sale is completed, title to the property passes to the purchaser and the Company has fulfilled any other obligations that may be relevant to the transaction. In its role as auctioneer, the Company auctions its inventory to equipment buyers through the auction process. Following the sale of the item, the Company invoices the buyer for the purchase price of the asset, taxes, and, if applicable, the buyer transaction fee, and collects payment from the buyer.
On the fall of the auctioneer’s hammer, the highest bidder becomes legally obligated to pay the full purchase price, which is the hammer price of the property purchased. Title to the property is transferred in exchange for the hammer price, and if applicable, the buyer transaction fee plus applicable taxes.
(d) Costs of services
Costs of services are comprised of expenses incurred in direct relation to conducting auctions (“direct expenses”), earning online marketplace revenue, and earning other fee revenue. Direct expenses include direct labour, buildings and facilities charges, travel, advertising and promotion costs and fees paid to unrelated third parties who introduce the Company to equipment sellers who sell property at the Company's auctions and marketplaces.
64
(d) Costs of services (continued)
Costs of services incurred to earn online marketplace revenue in addition to the costs listed above also include inspection costs. Inspections are generally performed at the seller’s physical location. The cost of inspections includes payroll costs and related benefits for the Company’s employees that perform and manage field inspection services, the related inspection report preparation and quality assurance costs, fees paid to contractors who perform field inspections, related travel and incidental costs for the Company’s inspection service organization, and office and occupancy costs for its inspection services personnel. Costs of earning online marketplace revenue also include costs for the Company’s customer support, online marketplace operations, logistics, title and lien investigation functions.
Costs of services incurred in earning other fee revenue include ancillary and logistical service expenses, direct labour (including commissions on sales), software maintenance fees, and materials. Costs of services exclude depreciation and amortization expenses.
(e) Cost of inventory sold
Cost of inventory sold includes the purchase price of assets sold for the Company’s own account and is determined using a specific identification basis.
(f) Share-based payments
The Company classifies a share-based payment award as an equity or liability payment based on the substantive terms of the award and any related arrangement.
Equity-classified share-based payments
Share unit plans
The Company has a senior executive performance share unit (“PSU”) plan and an employee PSU plan that provides for the award of PSUs to certain senior executives and employees, respectively, of the Company. The Company has the option to settle certain share unit awards in cash or shares and expects to settle them in shares. The cost of PSUs granted is measured at the fair value of the underlying PSUs at the grant date. PSUs vest based on the passage of time and achievement of performance criteria.
The Company also has a senior executive restricted share unit (“RSU”) plan and an employee RSU plan that provides for the award of RSUs to certain senior executives and employees, respectively, of the Company. The Company has the option to settle certain share unit awards in cash or shares and expects to settle all grants on and after 2017 in shares. The cost of RSUs granted is measured at the fair value based on the fair value of the Company’s common shares at the grant date. RSUs vest based on the passage of time and include restrictions related to employment.
This fair value of awards expected to vest under these plans is expensed over the respective remaining service period of the individual awards, on an accelerated recognition basis, with the corresponding increase to APIC recorded in equity. At the end of each reporting period, the Company revises its estimate of the number of equity instruments expected to vest. The impact of the revision of the original estimates, if any, is recognized in earnings, such that the consolidated expense reflects the revised estimate, with a corresponding adjustment to equity. Dividend equivalents on the equity-classified PSUs and RSUs are recognized as a reduction to retained earnings over the service period.
(f) Share-based payments (continued)
Equity-classified share-based payments (continued)
Stock option plans
The Company has three stock option compensation plans that provide for the award of stock options to selected employees, directors and officers of the Company. The cost of options granted is measured at the fair value of the underlying option at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of options expected to vest under these plans is expensed over the respective remaining service period of the individual awards, on an accelerated recognition basis, with the corresponding increase to APIC recorded in equity. Upon exercise, any consideration paid on exercise of the stock options and amounts fully amortized in APIC are credited to the common shares.
Liability-classified share-based payments
The Company maintains other share unit compensation plans that vest over a period of up to three years after grant. Under those plans, the Company is either required or expects to settle vested awards on a cash basis or by providing cash to acquire shares on the open market on the employee’s behalf, where the settlement amount is determined based on the average price of the Company’s common shares prior to the vesting date or, in the case of deferred share unit (“DSU”) recipients, following cessation of service on the Board of Directors.
These awards are classified as liability awards, measured at fair value at the date of grant and re-measured at fair value at each reporting date up to and including the settlement date. The determination of the fair value of the share units under these plans is described in note 24. The fair value of the awards is expensed over the respective vesting period of the individual awards with recognition of a corresponding liability. Changes in fair value after vesting are recognized through compensation expense. Compensation expense reflects estimates of the number of instruments expected to vest.
The impact of forfeitures and fair value revisions, if any, are recognized in earnings such that the cumulative expense reflects the revisions, with a corresponding adjustment to the settlement liability. Liability-classified share unit liabilities due within 12 months of the reporting date are presented in trade and other payables while settlements due beyond 12 months of the reporting date are presented in other non-current liabilities.
(g) Leases
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. The Company may have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, which are generally accounted for separately. Additionally, for certain vehicle and equipment leases, management applies a portfolio approach to account for the right-of-use ("ROU") assets and liabilities for assets leased with similar lease terms.
Operating leases
Operating leases are included in other non-current assets, trade and other payables, and other non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets if the initial lease term is greater than 12 months. For leases with an initial term of 12 months or less the Company recognizes those lease payments on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
ROU assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate, management uses the incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. Management uses the implicit rate when readily determinable. The Company includes lease payments for renewal or termination options in its determination of lease term, ROU asset, and lease liability when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise these options. Lease expense for lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and are included in costs of services and selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses.
66
(g) Leases (continued)
Finance leases
Finance lease ROU assets are included in property, plant and equipment, trade and other payables, and other non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
Finance lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company's leases do not provide an implicit rate, management uses the incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. Management uses the implicit rate when readily determinable. The Company includes lease payments for renewal, purchase options, or termination options in its determination of lease term, ROU asset, and lease liability when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise these options. Finance lease ROU assets are generally amortized over the lease term and are included in depreciation expense. The interest on the finance lease liabilities is included in interest expense.
(h) Fair value measurement
Fair value is the exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company measures financial instruments or discloses select non-financial assets at fair value at each balance sheet date. Also, fair values of financial instruments measured at amortized cost are disclosed in note 12.
The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data is available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.
All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value are categorized within a fair value hierarchy, as disclosed in note 12, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement or disclosure. This fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).
For assets and liabilities that are recognized in the financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorization at the end of each reporting period.
For the purposes of fair value disclosures, the Company has determined classes of assets and liabilities on the basis of the nature, characteristics and risks of the assets or liability and the level of the fair value hierarchy as explained above.
(i) Foreign currency translation
The parent entity’s presentation and functional currency is the United States dollar. The functional currency for each of the parent entity’s subsidiaries is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates, which is usually the currency of the country of residency.
Accordingly, the financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries that are not denominated in United States dollars have been translated into United States dollars using the exchange rate at the end of each reporting period for asset and liability amounts and the monthly average exchange rate for amounts included in the determination of earnings. Any gains or losses from the translation of asset and liability amounts are included in foreign currency translation adjustment in accumulated other comprehensive income.
In preparing the financial statements of the individual subsidiaries, transactions in currencies other than the entity’s functional currency are recognized at the rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transaction. At the end of each reporting period, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing at that date. Foreign currency differences arising on retranslation of monetary items are recognized in earnings.
67
(j) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents is comprised of cash on hand, deposits with financial institutions, and other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturity of three months or less when acquired, that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash.
(k) Restricted cash
In certain jurisdictions, local laws require the Company to hold cash in segregated bank accounts, which are used to settle auction proceeds payable resulting from live on site auctions and online marketplace sales conducted in those regions. In addition, the Company also holds cash generated from its online marketplace sales in separate escrow accounts, for settlement of the respective online marketplace transactions as a part of its secured escrow service. Restricted cash balances also include funds held in accounts owned by the Company in support of short-term stand-by letters of credit to provide seller security.
(l) Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables principally include amounts due from customers as a result of live on site auction and online marketplace transactions. The recorded amount reflects the purchase price of the item sold, including the Company’s commission. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience and customer economic data.
The Company reviews the allowance for doubtful accounts regularly and past due balances are reviewed for collectability. Account balances are charged against the allowance when the Company believes that the receivable will not be recovered.
(m) Inventories
Inventory consists of equipment and other assets purchased for resale in an upcoming live on site auction or online marketplace event. The Company typically purchases inventory for resale through a competitive process where the consignor or vendor has determined this to be the preferred method of disposition through the auction process. In addition, certain jurisdictions require auctioneers to hold title to assets and facilitate title transfer on sale. Inventory is valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value where net realizable value represents the expected sale price upon disposition less make-ready costs and the costs of disposal and transportation. As part of its government business, the Company purchases inventory for resale as part of its commitment to purchase certain surplus government property (note 26). The significant elements of cost include the acquisition price of the inventory and make-ready costs to prepare the inventory for sale that are not selling expenses and in-bound transportation costs. Write-downs to the carrying value of inventory are recorded in cost of inventory sold on the consolidated income statement.
(n) Property, plant and equipment
All property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Cost includes all expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition or development of the asset, net of any amounts received in relation to those assets, including scientific research and experimental development tax credits.
The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials and direct labour, any other costs directly attributable to bringing the assets to working condition for their intended use, the costs of dismantling and removing items and restoring the site on which they are located (if applicable), and capitalized interest on qualifying assets. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured reliably.
(n) Property, plant and equipment (continued)
All repairs and maintenance costs are charged to earnings during the financial period in which they are incurred. Gains and losses on disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment are determined by comparing the proceeds from disposal with the carrying amount of the item and are recognized net within operating income on the income statement.
Depreciation is provided to charge the cost of the assets to operations over their estimated useful lives based on their usage as follows:
Asset
Basis
Rate / term
Land improvements
Declining balance
Buildings
Straight-line
15 - 30
Yard equipment
20 - 30
Automotive equipment
Computer software and equipment
3 - 5
Office equipment
Leasehold improvements
Lesser of lease term or economic life
No depreciation is provided on freehold land or on assets in the course of construction or development. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment under capital leases is recorded in depreciation expense.
Legal obligations to retire and to restore property, plant and equipment and assets under operating leases are recorded at management’s best estimate in the period in which they are incurred, if a reasonable estimate can be made, with a corresponding increase in asset carrying value. The liability is accreted to face value over the remaining estimated useful life of the asset. The Company does not have any significant asset retirement obligations.
(o) Long-lived assets held for sale
Long-lived assets, or disposal groups comprising assets and liabilities, that are expected to be recovered primarily through sale rather than through continuing use are classified as assets held for sale. Immediately before classification as held for sale, the assets, or components of a disposal group, are measured at carrying amount in accordance with the Company’s accounting policies. Thereafter, the assets, or disposal group, are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less cost to sell and are not depreciated. Impairment losses on initial classification as held for sale and subsequent gains or losses on re-measurement are recognized in operating income on the income statement.
(p) Intangible assets
Intangible assets are measured at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Cost includes all expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition or development of the asset, net of any amounts received in relation to those assets, including scientific research and experimental development tax credits. Costs of internally developed software are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining estimated economic life of the software product. Costs related to software incurred prior to establishing technological feasibility or the beginning of the application development stage of software are charged to operations as such costs are incurred. Once technological feasibility is established or the application development stage has begun, directly attributable costs are capitalized until the software is available for use.
69
(p) Intangible assets (continued)
Amortization is recognized in net earnings on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of intangible assets from the date that they are available for use. The estimated useful lives are:
Trade names and trademarks
3 - 15 years or indefinite-lived
Customer relationships
6 - 20 years
Software assets
3 - 7 years
Customer relationships includes relationships with buyers and sellers.
(q) Impairment of long-lived and indefinite-lived assets
Long-lived assets, comprised of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets subject to amortization, are assessed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. For the purpose of impairment testing, long-lived assets are grouped and tested for recoverability at the lowest level that generates independent cash flows. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying value of the assets or asset groups is greater than the future projected undiscounted cash flows. The impairment loss is calculated as the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the asset or asset group. Fair value is based on valuation techniques or third party appraisals. Significant estimates and judgments are applied in determining these cash flows and fair values.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested annually for impairment as of December 31, and between annual tests if indicators of potential impairment exist. The Company has the option of performing a qualitative assessment to first determine whether the quantitative impairment test is necessary. This involves an assessment of qualitative factors to determine the existence of events or circumstances that would indicate whether it is more likely than not that the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than its fair value. If the qualitative assessment indicates it is not more likely than not that the carrying amount is less than its fair value, a quantitative impairment test is not required. Where a quantitative impairment test is required, the procedure is to compare the indefinite-lived intangible asset’s fair value with its carrying amount. An impairment loss is recognized as the difference between the indefinite-lived intangible asset’s carrying amount and its fair value.
(r) Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of an acquired enterprise over the fair value assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination.
Goodwill is not amortized, but it is tested annually for impairment at the reporting unit level as of December 31, and between annual tests if indicators of potential impairment exist. The Company has the option of performing a qualitative assessment of a reporting unit to first determine whether the quantitative impairment test is necessary. This involves an assessment of qualitative factors to determine the existence of events or circumstances that would indicate whether it is more likely than not that the carrying amount of the reporting unit to which goodwill belongs is less than its fair value. If the qualitative assessment indicates it is not more likely than not that the reporting unit’s carrying amount is less than its fair value, a quantitative impairment test is not required.
If a quantitative impairment test is required, the procedure is to identify potential impairment by comparing the reporting unit’s fair value with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The reporting unit’s fair value is determined using various valuation approaches and techniques that involve assumptions based on what the Company believes a hypothetical marketplace participant would use in estimating fair value on the measurement date. An impairment loss is recognized as the difference between the reporting unit’s carrying amount and its fair value. If the difference between the reporting unit’s carrying amount and fair value is greater than the amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit, the impairment loss is restricted by the amount of the goodwill allocated to the reporting unit.
(s) Deferred financing costs
Deferred financing costs represent the unamortized costs incurred on the issuance of the Company’s long-term debt. Amortization of deferred financing costs is provided on the effective interest rate method over the term of the facility. Deferred financing costs relating to the Company’s term debt are presented in the consolidated balance sheet as a direct reduction of the carrying amount of the long-term debt. Deferred financing costs relating to the Company’s revolving loans are presented on the balance sheet as a deferred charge.
(t) Taxes
Income tax expense represents the sum of current tax expense and deferred tax expense.
Current tax
The current tax expense is based on taxable profit for the period and includes any adjustments to tax payable in respect of previous years. Taxable profit differs from income before income taxes as reported in the consolidated income statement because it excludes (i) items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and (ii) items that are never taxable or deductible. The Company’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on temporary differences, which are differences between the accounting basis and the tax basis of the assets and liabilities, and non-capital loss, capital loss, and tax credits carryforwards are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws expected to apply when these differences reverse. Deferred tax benefits, including non-capital loss, capital loss, and tax credits carryforwards, are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is considered more likely than not. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period that enactment occurs. When realization of deferred income tax assets does not meet the more-likely-than-not criterion for recognition, a valuation allowance is provided.
Interest and penalties related to income taxes, including unrecognized tax benefits, are recorded in income tax expense in the income statement.
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions are recorded based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. The Company regularly assesses the potential outcomes of examinations by tax authorities in determining the adequacy of its provision for income taxes. The Company continually assesses the likelihood and amount of potential adjustments and adjusts the income tax provision, income taxes payable, and deferred taxes in the period in which the facts that give rise to a revision become known.
(u) Contingently redeemable non-controlling interest
Contingently redeemable equity instruments are initially recorded at their fair value on the date of issue within temporary equity on the balance sheet. When the equity instruments become redeemable or redemption is probable, the Company recognizes changes in the estimated redemption value immediately as they occur and adjusts the carrying amount of the redeemable equity instrument to equal the estimated redemption value at the end of each reporting period. Changes to the carrying value are charged or credited to retained earnings attributable to stockholders on the balance sheet.
Redemption value determinations require high levels of judgment (“Level 3” on the fair value hierarchy) and are based on various valuation techniques, including market comparable and discounted cash flow projections.
(v) Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share has been calculated by dividing net income attributable to stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share has been determined after giving effect to outstanding dilutive stock options and share units calculated by adjusting the net income attributable to stockholders and the weighted average number of shares outstanding for all dilutive shares.
(w) Defined contribution plans
The employees of the Company are members of retirement benefit plans to which the Company matches up to a specified percentage of employee contributions or, in certain jurisdictions, contributes a specified percentage of payroll costs as mandated by the local authorities. The only obligation of the Company with respect to the retirement benefit plans is to make the specified contributions.
(x) Advertising costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense is included in costs of services and selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses on the accompanying consolidated income statements.
(y) New and amended accounting standards
Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The Company adopted the new standard utilizing the “optional transition method”, which permits the Company to apply the new lease standard at the adoption date. As the optional transition method is being utilized, the Company’s reporting for the comparative periods presented in the financial statements in which it adopts Topic 842 will continue to be reported pursuant to Topic 840.
On adoption, the Company elected to utilize the package of practical expedients permitted within the new standard, which among other things, allows the Company to carryforward the historical lease classification. In addition, the Company elected to utilize the hindsight practical expedient to determine the reasonably certain lease term for existing leases. While lease classification will remain unchanged, hindsight will result in generally longer accounting lease terms where the Company has determined that it is reasonably certain to exercise certain renewal options and thereby increasing the useful lives of the corresponding leasehold improvements. The Company also elected not to recognize the lease assets and liabilities for leases with an initial term of 12 months or less and will recognize those lease payments on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
On adoption of the new standard the Company recognized ROU assets of $103,897,000 with a corresponding increase in operating lease liability. Offsetting the increase in ROU assets recognized was the reclassification of prepaid rent and deferred rent liabilities to ROU assets of $5,752,000. There was no impact on retained earnings or cash flows.
(z) Recent accounting standards not yet adopted
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which replaces the ‘incurred loss methodology’ credit impairment model with a new forward-looking “methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates.” To clarify or address stakeholders’ specific issues about certain aspects of ASU 2016-13, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvement to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments.
The Company will adopt the new standard prescribed by ASU 2016-13 and ASU 2019-04 effective January 1, 2020. The Company is currently updating processes and controls in preparation of the adoption. We do not expect the adoption of the new standard to have a material effect on our consolidated financial results.
3. Significant judgments, estimates and assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Future differences arising between actual results and the judgments, estimates and assumptions made by the Company at the reporting date, or future changes to estimates and assumptions, could necessitate adjustments to the underlying reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in future reporting periods.
Judgments, estimates and underlying assumptions are evaluated on an ongoing basis by management, and are based on historical experience and other factors including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, existing circumstances and assumptions about future developments may change due to market changes or circumstances and such changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur. Significant items subject to estimates include purchase price allocations, the carrying amounts of goodwill, the useful lives of long-lived assets, share based compensation, the determination of lease term and lease liabilities, deferred income taxes, reserves for tax uncertainties, and other contingencies.
4. Segmented information
The Company’s principal business activity is the management and disposition of used industrial equipment and other durable assets. The Company’s operations are comprised of one reportable segment and other business activities that are not reportable as follows:
65,156
Selling, General and Administration expenses ("SG&A")
Depreciation and amortization expenses ("D&A")
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment ("PPE")
Foreign exchange gain
Income tax expense
(41,623)
73
4. Segmented information (continued)
71,628
D&A expenses
Gain on disposition of PPE
(31,006)
57,504
Foreign exchange loss
(2,088)
The carrying value of goodwill of $652,243,000 has been allocated to A&M and $20,067,000 has been allocated to Other in relation to the Mascus acquisition. As in prior periods, the CODM does not evaluate the performance of its operating segments based on segment assets and liabilities, nor does the Company classify liabilities on a segmented basis.
652,243
651,359
20,067
20,235
Total Goodwill
The Company’s geographic information as determined by the revenue and location of assets, which represents property, plant and equipment is as follows:
United
States
Europe
Total revenue for the year ended:
December 31, 2019
743,793
247,737
173,054
154,057
December 31, 2018
548,695
284,989
180,817
155,525
452,599
245,106
127,706
145,780
Property, plant and equipment:
256,159
106,922
73,991
47,410
260,489
100,983
77,496
47,631
5. Revenues
The Company’s revenue from the rendering of services is as follows:
6. Operating expenses
Employee compensation expenses
50,093
41,391
35,440
Buildings, facilities and technology expenses
7,865
9,477
8,359
Travel, advertising and promotion expenses
31,652
27,606
23,994
16,115
14,008
11,220
246,028
249,115
208,370
61,177
60,930
53,151
38,248
36,728
30,440
Professional fees
15,572
16,768
13,522
Other SG&A expenses
21,364
19,135
17,787
75
6. Operating expenses (continued)
Acquisition-related costs consist of operating expenses directly incurred as part of a business combination, due diligence and integration planning related to the IronPlanet acquisition (note 29), and continuing employment costs that are recognized separately from our business combinations.
IronPlanet:
Other acquisition-related costs
2,944
34,653
Other acquisitions:
Continuing employment costs
2,091
3,418
567
201
Depreciation expense
29,112
29,021
28,337
Amortization expense
41,389
37,593
24,357
During the year ended December 31, 2019, depreciation expense of $410,000 (2018: $494,000; 2017: $1,207,000) and amortization expense of $27,944,000 (2018: $18,996,000; 2017: $11,662,000) were recorded relating to software.
7. Impairment Loss
Long-lived asset impairment
Long-lived assets, which are comprised of property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets, are assessed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. For the purpose of impairment testing, long-lived assets are grouped and tested for recoverability at the lowest level that generates independent cash flows from another asset group. The carrying amount of the long-lived asset group is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the long-lived asset group’s use and eventual disposition. Where the carrying amount of the long-lived asset group is not recoverable, its fair value is determined in order to calculate any impairment loss. An impairment loss is measured as the excess of the long-lived asset group’s carrying amount over its fair value.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, management identified indicators of impairment on certain software and software under development intangible assets (the “technology assets”). The indicators consisted of decisions made after the acquisition of IronPlanet that adversely impacted the extent or manner in which certain technology assets would be utilized. As part of its integration activities the Company determined that it was more likely than not that certain technology assets would not be utilized or developed as originally intended and no longer had value. As a result, management performed an impairment test that resulted in the recognition of an impairment loss of $8,911,000 on the technology assets.
8. Other income
For the period ended December 31, 2019, there were no significant items recorded in other income. In 2018, other income included a gain of $4,935,000 recognized on the disposition of one of the Company’s equity accounted for investments. The Company received net proceeds of $6,147,000 on closing and is entitled to receive up to $1,020,000 upon the satisfaction of certain escrow release conditions over a period of five years. The first escrow tranche was released during the period ended December 31, 2019. Additionally, the Company was entitled to receive up to $1,700,000 of contingent consideration upon the achievement of certain financial targets for the period from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. The Company has not recognized any contingent consideration.
76
9. Income taxes
The expense for the year can be reconciled to income before income taxes as follows:
Earnings before income tax
Statutory federal and provincial tax rate in Canada
27.00
26.00
Expected income tax expense
51,506
41,178
20,122
Non-deductible expenses
3,705
4,810
5,668
Adjustment to prior year provision to statutory tax returns
1,323
(528)
Changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets
(550)
(771)
(1,089)
Different tax rates of subsidiaries operating in foreign jurisdictions
(11,818)
(17,145)
(12,269)
U.S. tax reform impacts
6,949
4,899
(9,734)
Change in enacted tax rates
(1,016)
93
(229)
Change in estimate of deductibility of stock options
(1,557)
Unrecognized tax benefits
(2,347)
(1,800)
3,291
Benefits of deductible stock options vested and exercised
(1,780)
(2,434)
(1,359)
(3,030)
853
(228)
The income tax expense (recovery) consists of:
Canadian:
Current tax expense
19,752
13,209
14,245
Deferred tax expense (recovery)
3,346
3,958
(10,192)
Foreign:
Current tax expense before application of operating loss carryforwards
24,815
19,851
8,987
Tax benefit of operating loss carryforwards
(11,770)
(8,293)
(3,876)
Total foreign current tax expense
13,045
11,558
5,111
Deferred tax expense before adjustment
to opening valuation allowance
5,727
2,386
(6,317)
Adjustment to opening valuation allowance
(247)
(105)
(759)
Total foreign deferred tax expense (recovery)
5,480
2,281
(7,076)
The foreign provision for income taxes is based on foreign pre-tax earnings of $108,714,000, $102,824,000, and $64,252,000, in 2019, 2018, and 2017 respectively. The Company’s consolidated financial statements provide for any related tax liability on undistributed earnings that we intend to repatriate in the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2019, income taxes have not been provided on a cumulative total of $483,430,000 of such earnings. The amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to these temporary differences is estimated to be approximately $10,506,000. Earnings retained by subsidiaries and equity-accounted investments amount to approximately $500,430,000 (2018: 484,510,000; 2017: 469,000,000). The Company accrues withholding and other taxes that would become payable on the distribution of earnings only to the extent that either the Company does not control the relevant entity or it is expected that these earnings will be remitted in the foreseeable future.
9. Income taxes (continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were as follows:
Deferred tax assets:
13,307
4,703
5,579
6,385
Share-based compensation
5,973
4,923
Tax losses and tax credit carryforwards
33,248
48,881
Lease liabilities
29,523
2,578
3,088
12,266
90,718
79,736
Deferred tax liabilities:
(14,783)
(10,918)
(8,499)
(8,390)
(50,531)
(54,810)
Right-of-use assets
(25,244)
(7,496)
(12,051)
(106,553)
(86,169)
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
(15,835)
(6,433)
Valuation allowance
(12,913)
(13,438)
(28,748)
(19,871)
At December 31, 2019, the Company had non-capital loss carryforwards that are available to reduce taxable income in the future years. These non-capital loss carryforwards expire as follows:
2020
4,983
2021
3,543
2022
4,878
2023
2,964
2024 and thereafter
69,462
85,830
The Company has capital loss carryforwards of approximately $39,981,209 (2018: $9,292,000) available to reduce future capital gains and interest deduction carryforwards of $23,746,000 (2018: $22,112,000), both of which carryforward indefinitely.
Tax losses are denominated in the currency of the countries in which the respective subsidiaries are located and operate. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates could reduce the U.S. dollar equivalent value of these tax loss and tax credit carry forwards in future years.
In assessing the realizability of our deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during periods in which temporary differences become deductible and the loss carry forwards or tax credits can be utilized. Management considers projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making our assessment.
Uncertain tax positions
Tax positions are evaluated in a two-step process. The Company first determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination. If a tax position meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold it is then measured to determine the amount of the benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The tax position is measured as the largest amount of the benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company classifies unrecognized tax benefits that are not expected to result in the payment or receipt of cash within one year as non-current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
At December 31, 2019, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $20,232,000 (2018: $22,584,000). Of this total, $8,854,000 (2018: $10,556,000) represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective tax rate.
Reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits:
Unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year
22,584
25,910
Increases - tax positions taken in prior period
700
725
Decreases - tax positions taken in prior period
(57)
(107)
Increases - tax positions taken in current period
1,268
2,644
Settlement and lapse of statute of limitations
(4,364)
(4,944)
Currency translation adjustment
(1,644)
Unrecognized tax benefits, end of year
20,232
Interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded within the provision for income tax expense on the consolidated income statement. At December 31, 2019, the Company had accrued $3,569,000 (2018: $4,170,000) for interest and penalties.
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to audit by the Canadian federal and provincial taxing authorities, by the U.S. federal and various state taxing authorities and by the taxing authorities in various foreign jurisdictions. Tax years ranging from 2014 to 2019 remain subject to examination in Canada, the United States, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands.
10. Earnings per share attributable to stockholders
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) attributable to stockholders was calculated by dividing the net income attributable to stockholders by the weighted average (“WA”) number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS attributable to stockholders was calculated by dividing the net income attributable to stockholders by the WA number of shares of common stock outstanding if the potentially dilutive securities had been issued. Potentially dilutive securities include unvested PSUs, unvested RSUs, and outstanding stock options. The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, an increase in the fair market value of the Company’s common stock can result in a greater dilutive effect from potentially dilutive securities.
WA
attributable to
number
Per share
stockholders
of shares
amount
Effect of dilutive securities:
Share units
458,763
Stock options
780,621
(0.01)
79
10. Earnings per share attributable to stockholders (continued)
459,503
865,384
(152)
353,880
714,923
74,875
11. Supplemental cash flow information
(8,611)
(43,341)
(19,161)
44,633
(77,292)
(8,557)
Advances against auction contracts
2,766
(8,266)
3,246
Prepaid expenses and deposits
(3,403)
646
1,178
(445)
13,053
(6,067)
69,382
8,768
25,783
(21,296)
39,531
21,854
5,812
1,954
(3,986)
1,070
(5,421)
Operating lease obligation
(13,404)
1,168
(1,673)
1,410
Net capital spending, which consists of property, plant and equipment and intangible asset additions, net of proceeds on disposition of property, plant and equipment, was $35,075,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2018: $32,426,000; 2017: $34,436,000).
Interest paid, net of interest capitalized
37,046
39,429
23,360
Interest received
3,802
2,888
3,196
Net income taxes paid
26,699
10,352
28,281
Non-cash purchase of property, plant and equipment under capital lease
15,282
8,968
8,820
Non-cash right of use assets obtained in exchange for new lease obligations
29,117
267,910
63,206
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
12. Fair value measurement
All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements are categorized within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement or disclosure:
December 31,2019
December 31,2018
Carrying
Category
Fair value
Fair values disclosed:
Level 1
Level 2
490,933
520,625
489,136
487,813
Term loans
154,548
222,162
224,582
The carrying value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade and other receivables, advances against auction contracts, auction proceeds payable, trade and other payables, and short term debt approximate their fair values due to their short terms to maturity. The carrying value of the term loans, before deduction of deferred debt issue costs, approximates its fair value as the interest rates on the loans were short-term in nature. The fair value of the senior unsecured notes is determined by reference to a quoted market price.
13. Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables
121,752
112,680
Consumption taxes receivable
12,108
16,099
Other receivables
3,542
478
Trade receivables are generally secured by the equipment that they relate to as it is Company policy that equipment is not released until payment has been collected. Trade receivables are due for settlement within three to seven days of the date of sale, after which they are interest bearing. Other receivables are unsecured and non-interest bearing.
As at December 31, 2019, there were $5,225,000 of impaired receivables that have been provided for (December 31, 2018: $5,942,000).
Consumption taxes receivable are deemed fully recoverable unless disputed by the relevant tax authority. The other classes within trade and other receivables do not contain impaired assets.
81
14. Inventory
At each period end, inventory is reviewed to ensure that it is recorded at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Specific consideration was given to the valuation of the surplus government inventory. The Company determined the valuation provision to be insignificant.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded an inventory write-down of $4,215,000 (2018: $1,011,000; 2017: $834,000).
15. Other current assets
12,925
15,558
Assets held for sale
15,051
22,184
18,446
Advances against auction contracts arise when the Company pays owners, in advance, a portion of the expected gross auction proceeds from the sale of the related assets at future auctions. The Company’s policy is to limit the amount of advances to a percentage of the estimated gross auction proceeds from the sale of the related assets, and before advancing funds, require proof of owner’s title to and equity in the assets, as well as receive delivery of the assets and title documents at a specified auction site, by a specified date and in a specified condition of repair.
Advances against auction contracts are generally secured by the assets to which they relate, as the Company requires owners to provide promissory notes and security instruments registering the Company as a charge against the asset. Advances against auction contracts are usually settled within two weeks of the date of sale, as they are netted against the associated auction proceeds payable to the owner.
584
Site preparation costs
Reclassified from property, plant and equipment
20,610
Disposal
(6,143)
Reclassified from (to) property, plant and equipment
4,071
(4,071)
As at December 31, 2019, the Company’s assets held for sale consisted of two excess auction sites located in the United States. Management made the strategic decision to sell these properties to maximize the Company’s return on invested capital. The estimated sales proceeds are expected to be in excess of the current book value. The properties have been actively marketed for sale, and management expects the sales to be completed within 12 months of December 31, 2019. These properties belong to the A&M reportable segment.
As at December 31, 2018, the Company’s assets held for sale consisted of excess auction sites located in the United States. Management made the strategic decision to sell this excess acreage to maximize the Company’s return on invested capital.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company sold excess auction site acreage in Nashville, United States for net proceeds of $4,642,000 resulting in a gain of $571,000 (2018: $1,439,000 gain related to the sale of property located in Prince George, Canada and Albuquerque, United States; 2017: $602,000 gain related to the sale of property in Orlando, United States, and Truro, Canada).
16. Property, plant and equipment
As at December 31, 2019
Cost
depreciation
Net book value
Land and improvements
361,623
(77,015)
284,608
252,774
(115,423)
137,351
Yard and automotive equipment
66,871
(40,686)
26,185
80,756
(68,431)
12,325
31,760
(21,776)
9,984
19,756
(16,541)
3,215
Assets under development
10,814
824,354
(339,872)
As at December 31, 2018
362,781
(72,547)
290,234
252,182
(106,959)
145,223
57,983
(36,640)
21,343
70,623
(60,258)
10,365
28,490
(19,582)
8,908
19,735
(16,240)
3,495
7,031
798,825
(312,226)
During the year ended December 31, 2019, interest of $85,000 (2018: $110,000; 2017: $110,000) was capitalized to the cost of assets under development. These interest costs relating to qualifying assets are capitalized at a weighted average rate of 4.07% (2018: 4.06%; 2017: 2.97%).
Additions during the year include $15,282,000 (2018: $8,968,000; 2017: $8,820,000) of property, plant and equipment under capital leases.
17. Other non-current assets
116,209
Tax receivable
11,792
12,705
Equity-accounted investments
4,276
4,010
Deferred debt issue costs
1,403
2,017
11,999
10,663
The Company holds a 48% share interest in a group of companies detailed below (together, the “Cura Classis entities”), which have common ownership. The Cura Classis entities provide dedicated fleet management services in three jurisdictions to a common customer unrelated to the Company. The Company has determined the Cura Classis entities are variable interest entities and the Company is not the primary beneficiary, as it does not have the power to make any decisions that significantly affect the economic results of the Cura Classis entities. Accordingly, the Company accounts for its investments in the Cura Classis entities following the equity method.
83
17. Other non-current assets (continued)
Equity-accounted investments (continued)
A condensed summary of the Company’s investments in and advances to equity-accounted investees are as follows (in thousands of United States dollars, except percentages):
Ownership
December 31,
percentage
Cura Classis entities
As a result of the Company’s investments, the Company is exposed to risks associated with the results of operations of the Cura Classis entities. The Company has no other business relationships with the Cura Classis entities. The Company’s maximum risk of loss associated with these entities is the investment carrying amount.
18. Intangible assets
amortization
53,319
(2,028)
51,291
124,865
(34,666)
90,199
Software
157,776
(78,330)
79,446
Software under development
12,444
348,404
(115,024)
53,409
(1,201)
52,208
124,986
(22,010)
102,976
127,320
(48,522)
78,798
11,640
317,355
(71,733)
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized an impairment loss of nil (2018: nil; 2017: the Company recorded an impairment loss relating to certain software and software under development $8,911,000) (note 7).
At December 31, 2019, a net carrying amount of $62,589,000 (December 31, 2018: $61,883,000) included in intangible assets was not subject to amortization. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the cost of additions was reduced by $1,022,000 for recognition of tax credits (2018: $1,606,000; 2017: $888,000).
During the year ended December 31, 2019, interest of $402,000 (2018: $460,000; 2017: $281,000) was capitalized to the cost of software under development. These interest costs relating to qualifying assets are capitalized at a weighted average rate of 4.01% (2018: 4.09%; 2017: 3.18%).
During the year ended December 31, 2019, the weighted average amortization period for all classes of intangible assets was 7.8 years (2018: 8.2; 2017: 7.9 years).
84
18. Intangible assets (continued)
As at December 31, 2019, estimated annual amortization expense for the next five years ended December 31 are as follows:
35,539
29,706
23,438
17,214
2024
10,139
116,036
19. Goodwill
670,922
Additions
3,671
Foreign exchange movement
(2,999)
623
20. Trade and other payables
Trade payables
72,918
93,482
Accrued liabilities
69,539
63,666
Social security and sales taxes payable
27,737
19,390
Net consumption taxes payable
12,298
13,456
3,714
Other payables
6,657
7,547
21. Debt
Carrying amount
Long-term debt:
Term loans:
Denominated in Canadian dollars, secured, bearing interest at a weighted average rate of 3.958%, due in monthly installments of interest only and quarterly installments of principal, maturing in October 2021
161,891
Denominated in United States dollars, secured, bearing interest at a weighted average rate of 3.715%, due in weekly installments of interest only and quarterly installments of principal, repaid in full in December 2019
62,690
Less: unamortized debt issue costs
(807)
(2,419)
Senior unsecured notes:
Bearing interest at 5.375% due in semi-annual installments, with the full amount of principal due in January 2025
(9,067)
(10,864)
Total long-term debt
Total debt
650,186
731,194
Current portion
Non-current portion
On October 27, 2016, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of lenders.
At that time, the Credit Agreement provided the Company with:
The Company may use the proceeds from the Revolving facilities for general corporate purposes. The amount available pursuant to the Terms loans was only available to finance the acquisition of IronPlanet and is not available for other corporate purposes upon repayment of amounts borrowed under that facility. On May 31, 2017, the Company borrowed $325,000,000 under the Term loans to finance the acquisition of IronPlanet (note 29). The Term loans amortize in equal quarterly installments in an annual amount of 5% for the first two years and 10% in the third through fifth years, with the balance payable at maturity. Prepayments are applied against future scheduled mandatory payments. Upon the closing of the acquisition the Credit Agreement became secured by the assets of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries in Canada and the United States. The Credit Agreement may become unsecured again, subject to the Company meeting specified credit rating or leverage ratio conditions.
On June 21, 2018, the Company reduced the amount available on the Company’s Revolving facilities by $185,000,000.
At December 31, 2019, the Company’s Credit Agreement provides the Company with:
86
21. Debt (continued)
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company made scheduled debt repayments of $13,592,000 on the Term loans (2018: $11,013,000). For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company made voluntary prepayments totalling $62,690,000 (2018: $80,000,000) on the term loan denominated in United States dollars.
On December 21, 2016, the Company completed the offering of $500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 5.375% senior unsecured notes due January 15, 2025 (the “Notes”). Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually. The Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on an unsecured basis, subject to certain exceptions, by each of the Company’s subsidiaries that is a borrower or guarantees indebtedness under the Credit Agreement. IronPlanet and certain of its subsidiaries were added as additional guarantors in connection with the acquisition of IronPlanet.
Short-term debt is comprised of drawings in different currencies on the Company’s committed revolving credit facilities and have a weighted average interest rate of 2.3% (December 31, 2018: 2.3%).
As at December 31, 2019, principal repayments for the remaining period to the contractual maturity dates are as follows:
Face value
137,078
Thereafter
As at December 31, 2019, the Company had unused committed revolving credit facilities aggregating $489,937,000 of which $485,509,000 is available until October 27, 2021.
22. Other non-current liabilities
Operating lease liability
111,322
Tax payable
22,583
Finance lease liability
16,336
10,146
3,348
9,251
23. Equity and dividends
Share capital
Preferred stock
Unlimited number of senior preferred shares, without par value, issuable in series.
Unlimited number of junior preferred shares, without par value, issuable in series.
All issued shares are fully paid. No preferred shares have been issued.
23. Equity and dividends (continued)
Share capital (continued)
There were 1,223,674 common shares repurchased for $42,012,000 during the year ended December 31, 2019. There were no common shares repurchased in the years ended December 2018 and 2017.
Dividends
Declared and paid
The Company declared and paid the following dividends during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017:
Dividend
Declaration date
Record date
dividends
Payment date
Year ended December 31, 2019:
Fourth quarter 2018
January 25, 2019
0.1800
February 15, 2019
19,568
March 8, 2019
First quarter of 2019
May 8, 2019
May 29, 2019
19,592
June 19, 2019
Second quarter of 2019
August 8, 2019
0.2000
August 28, 2019
21,631
September 18, 2019
Third quarter 2019
November 7, 2019
November 27, 2019
21,744
December 18, 2019
Year ended December 31, 2018:
Fourth quarter 2017
January 26, 2018
0.1700
February 16, 2018
18,246
March 9, 2018
First quarter of 2018
May 9, 2018
May 30, 2018
18,342
June 20, 2018
Second quarter of 2018
August 7, 2018
August 29, 2018
19,528
September 19, 2018
Third quarter 2018
November 8, 2018
November 28, 2018
19,562
December 19, 2018
Year ended December 31, 2017:
Fourth quarter 2016
January 23, 2017
February 10, 2017
18,160
March 3, 2017
First quarter 2017
May 4, 2017
May 23, 2017
18,188
June 13, 2017
Second quarter 2017
August 4, 2017
August 25, 2017
18,210
September 15, 2017
Third quarter 2017
November 7, 2017
November 29, 2017
18,227
December 20, 2017
Declared and undistributed
In addition to the above dividends, since the end of the year the Directors have recommended the payment of a final dividend of $0.20 cents per common share, accumulating to a total dividend of $21,906,000. The aggregate amount of the proposed final dividend is expected to be paid out of retained earnings on March 6, 2020 to stockholders of record on February 14, 2020. This dividend payable has not been recognized as a liability in the financial statements. The payment of this dividend will not have any tax consequence for the Company.
Foreign currency translation reserve
Foreign currency translation adjustment includes intra-entity foreign currency transactions that are of a long-term investment nature, which generated net loss of $1,082,000 for 2019 (2018: net loss of $9,602,000; 2017: net gain of $18,129,000).
88
24. Share-based payments
Share-based payments consist of the following compensation costs:
Stock option compensation expense:
7,895
8,948
357
Share unit expense:
Equity-classified share units
Liability-classified share units
1,380
1,764
670
Employee share purchase plan - employer contributions
2,174
1,813
16,405
23,446
19,712
Share unit expense and employer contributions to the employee share purchase plan are recognized in SG&A expenses.
The Company has three stock option plans that provide for the award of stock options to selected employees, directors, and officers of the Company: a) Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, b) IronPlanet 1999 Stock Plan, and c) IronPlanet 2015 Stock Plan. The IronPlanet 1999 Stock Plan and IronPlanet 2015 Stock Plan were assumed by the Company as part of the acquisition of IronPlanet (note 29).
Stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 is presented below:
Common
remaining
Aggregate
shares under
exercise
contractual
intrinsic
option
price
life (in years)
value
Outstanding, December 31, 2016
3,366,714
24.02
7.5
33,601
Granted
970,947
31.07
Assumed in acquisition
737,358
14.26
Exercised
(444,571)
22.35
3,762
Forfeited
(170,704)
19.38
Outstanding, December 31, 2017
4,459,744
24.29
17,649
923,199
32.14
(1,235,154)
23.10
14,808
(132,624)
25.91
Expired
(1,302)
25.76
Outstanding, December 31, 2018
4,013,863
26.41
7.2
25,374
914,068
34.03
(1,672,022)
24.58
27,349
(458,092)
32.15
(628)
24.44
Outstanding, December 31, 2019
2,797,189
7.1
38,874
Exercisable, December 31, 2019
1,497,043
26.11
6.0
25,203
89
24. Share-based payments (continued)
Stock option plans (continued)
Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common shares at the grant date, with vesting periods ranging from immediate to five years and terms not exceeding 10 years. At December 31, 2019, there were 7,222,978 (December 31, 2018: 2,478,321) shares authorized and available for grants of options under the stock option plans. The options outstanding at December 31, 2019 expire on dates ranging to August 12, 2029. The WA grant date fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2019 was $7.52 per option (2018: $7.69; 2017: $7.22). The WA share price of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2019 was $40.32 (2018: $35.08; 2017: $30.81).
The significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 are presented in the following table on a weighted average basis:
Risk free interest rate
2.5
2.0
Expected dividend yield
2.06
2.11
2.15
Expected lives of the stock options
Expected volatility
26.8
28.1
27.8
In 2017, the fair value of the stock options assumed from the IronPlanet acquisition is estimated on the acquisition date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average fair value of the assumed options was $16.93. The significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these assumed stock options are presented in the following table on a weighted average basis:
0.8
2.19
0.4
32.1
As at December 31, 2019, the unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to the non-vested stock options was $3,457,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.0 years. Cash received from stock-based award exercises for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $41,094,000 (2018: $28,524,000; 2017: $9,936,000). The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from option exercise of the share-based payment arrangements totaled $1,679,000 for the year ended December 31, 2019 (2018: $2,793,000; 2017: $1,017,000).
Share unit activity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 is presented below:
Equity-classified awards
Liability-classified awards
PSUs
RSUs
PSUs(1)
DSUs
WA grant
date fair
243,968
27.48
311,329
23.96
160,009
23.37
73,520
25.41
136,073
30.28
125,152
26.93
98,775
31.21
878
32.30
19,967
29.67
Transferred to (from) equity awards on modification
81,533
24.47
(81,533)
24.66
Vested and settled
(27,326)
26.82
(49,873)
23.64
(156,221)
23.33
(19,457)
26.39
434,248
27.83
259,241
26.38
4,666
26.42
93,487
26.32
240,803
35.63
91,251
32.10
34.70
26,553
33.42
Transferred to equity awards on modification
257,659
31.30
(257,659)
(212,263)
33.78
(4,732)
26.54
(6,605)
23.16
(50,159)
31.41
(8,417)
32.00
(1,582)
26.45
670,288
31.46
207,986
28.99
113,435
28.16
170,208
36.13
36,350
35.40
24,810
35.99
(251,883)
30.33
(265)
31.98
(19,877)
27.45
(159,889)
33.21
(6,651)
34.27
428,724
32.89
237,420
29.72
118,368
29.64
The total market value of liability-classified share units vested and released during the year ended December 31, 2019 was $774,000 (2018: $410,000; 2017: $6,521,000). The Company modified the employee PSU plans from liability-classified to equity-classified share units prior to the 2018 vesting.
Senior executive and employee PSU plans
The Company grants PSUs under a senior executive PSU plan and an employee PSU plan (the “PSU Plans”). Under the PSU Plans, the number of PSUs that vest is conditional upon specified market, service, and/or performance vesting conditions being met. The PSU Plans allow the Company to choose whether to settle the awards in cash or in shares. The Company intends to settle by issuance of shares for units granted in 2018 and onwards. With respect to settling in shares, the Company has the option to either (i) arrange for the purchase shares on the open market on the employee’s behalf based on the cash value that otherwise would be delivered, or (ii) to issue a number of shares equal to the number of units that vest.
The fair value of the equity-classified PSUs awarded in 2019 is estimated using the 20-day volume weighted average price of the Company’s common shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange, as these awards are not subject to market vesting conditions. PSUs awarded in 2018 and 2017 contained market vesting conditions and their fair value is estimated on modification date and on the date of grant using a Monte-Carlo simulation model. The significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the equity-classified PSUs awarded during 2018 and 2017 are presented in the following table on a weighted average basis:
1.92
1.40
2.09
Expected lives of the PSUs
31.1
28.2
Average expected volatility of comparable companies
34.1
37.0
Share unit plans (continued)
Senior executive and employee PSU plans (continued)
The significant assumptions used to estimate fair value of the liability-classified PSUs awarded under the employee PSU plan during 2017 are presented in the following table on a weighted average basis:
2.01
28.9
33.4
Risk free interest rate is estimated using Bloomberg’s United States dollar Swap Rate as of the valuation date. Expected dividend yield assumes a continuation of the most recent quarterly dividend payments. Given the limited historical information available for the PSUs, the Company estimated the expected life of PSUs with reference to the expected life of stock options. Stock options have five-year expected lives, whereas PSUs vest after three years. As such, the Company estimates the expected life of the PSUs to equal the three-year vesting period. Expected volatility is estimated from Bloomberg’s volatility surface of the common shares as of the valuation date.
As at December 31, 2019, the unrecognized share unit expense related to equity-classified PSUs was $5,015,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
Sign-on grant PSUs
On August 11, 2014, the Company awarded 102,375 one-time sign-on grant PSUs (the "SOG PSUs") that are subject to market vesting conditions related to the Company's share performance over rolling two, three, four, and five-year periods. This plan was modified in 2017 and 2018, and the nature, impact, and significant assumptions used to determine fair value at modification are provided in the "Modifications" section below.
This plan fully vested in August 2019 and there was no unrecognized share unit expense at December 31, 2019.
The Company has RSU plans that are equity-settled and not subject to market vesting conditions.
Fair values of RSUs are estimated on grant date using the 20-day volume weighted average price of the Company's common shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
As at December 31, 2019, the unrecognized share unit expense related to equity-classified RSUs was $2,455,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.2 years.
The Company has DSU plans that are cash-settled and not subject to market vesting conditions.
Fair values of DSUs are estimated on grant date and at each reporting date using the 20-day volume weighted average price of the Company's common shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange. DSUs are granted under the DSU plan to members of the Board of Directors. There is no unrecognized share unit expense related to liability-classified DSUs as they vest immediately and are expensed upon grant.
DSUs (continued)
As at December 31, 2019, the Company had a total share unit liability of $5,130,000 (2018: $3,714,000) in respect of share units under the DSU plans presented in current liabilities.
Modifications
The Company modified various share-based payment plans in 2017 and 2018. The nature and impact of these modifications are discussed further below.
Employee and Executive PSU Plan modification
On March 1, 2018, the Company modified the market and performance vesting conditions for the PSUs. Concurrently, the PSUs under the employee PSU plan were reclassified to equity awards based on the Company’s settlement intentions. The weighted average fair value of the PSU awards outstanding on the modification date was $31.35. The incremental compensation recognized as a result of the vesting condition modification was $1,400,000. The share unit liability related to the employee PSUs, representing the portion of the fair value attributable to past service, was $6,701,000, which was reclassified to equity on that date. No incremental compensation was recognized as a result of the employee PSU settlement modification.
Sign-on Grants modifications
Prior to May 1, 2017, the Company was only able to settle the SOG PSU award in cash, and as such, the plan was classified as a liability award. On May 1, 2017 (the “2017 SOG modification date”), the shareholders approved amendments to the SOG PSU grant, allowing the Company to choose whether to settle the award in cash or in shares. The Company chose to settle in shares and, accordingly:
The weighted average fair value of the SOG PSUs outstanding on the modification date was $24.47. No incremental compensation was recognized as a result of the modification. At the time of this modification, the SOG PSUs were contingently redeemable in cash in the event of death of the participant. Consequently, the Company reclassified $1,803,000 to temporary equity, representing the portion of the contingent redemption amount of the SOG PSUs as if redeemable on May 1, 2017, to the extent attributable to prior service.
On September 11, 2018, the Company modified the performance vesting conditions of the SOG PSUs. The modification impacted the third and fourth tranches of PSUs to vest. As a result of the modification, the actual number of units to vest will be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company based on absolute Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) performance over the period commencing on July 1, 2017, and ending on the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. Prior to this modification, the absolute TSR performance period commenced on August 11, 2014.
Modifications (continued)
The weighted average fair value of the PSU awards outstanding on the modification date was $43.34. The incremental compensation recognized as a result of the vesting condition modification was $838,000. It was determined based on the change in fair value of the equity-classified SOG PSUs immediately before and after modification. Significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of the equity-classified SOG PSUs to determine the incremental compensation cost were as follows:
September 11, 2018
1.53
Expected lives of the PSU
year
29.2
Unrecognized compensation expense based on the fair value of the SOG PSU award on the modification has already amortized over the remaining service period.
RSU Modification
Prior to November 8, 2017, the Company was only able to settle the RSU awards in cash, and as such, the RSUs were classified as liability awards, which are fair valued on grant date and at each reporting date using the 20-day volume weighted average price of the Company’s common shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange. On November 8, 2017 (the “RSU modification date”), the Board of Directors approved amendments to the RSU plans, allowing the Company to choose whether to settle the awards in cash or in shares for new RSUs granted after the RSU modification date. With respect to settling in shares, the Company has the option to either (i) arrange for the purchase shares on the open market on the employee’s behalf based on the cash value that otherwise would be delivered, or (ii) to issue a number of shares equal to the number of units that vest, net of any applicable withholding, if any. The Company intends to settle in shares.
Employee share purchase plan
The Company has an employee share purchase plan that allows all employees that have completed two months of service to contribute funds to purchase common shares at the current market value at the time of share purchase. Employees may contribute up to 4% of their salary. The Company will match between 50% and 100% of the employee’s contributions, depending on the employee’s length of service with the Company.
25. Leases
The Company's breakdown of lease expense is as follows:
Operating lease cost
17,878
20,547
Finance lease cost
Amortization of leased assets
7,510
3,996
Interest on lease liabilities
800
389
Short-term lease cost
9,090
7,187
Sublease income
(559)
(904)
34,719
31,215
25. Leases (continued)
The Company has entered into commercial leases for various auction sites and offices located in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. The majority of these leases are non-cancellable. The Company also has further operating leases for computer equipment, certain motor vehicles and small office equipment where it is not in the best interest of the Company to purchase these assets.
The majority of the Company's operating leases have a fixed term with a remaining life between one month and 20 years, with renewal options included in the contracts. The leases have varying contract terms, escalation clauses and renewal options. Generally, there are no restrictions placed upon the lessee by entering into these leases, other than restrictions on use of property, sub-letting and alterations. At the inception of a lease, the Company determines whether it is reasonably certain to exercise a renewal option and includes the options in the determination of the lease term and the lease liability where it is reasonably certain to exercise the option. If the Company's intention is to exercise an option subsequent to the commencement of the lease, the Company will re-assess the lease term. The Company has included certain renewal options in its operating lease liabilities for key property leases for locations that have strategic importance to the Company such as its Corporate Head Office. The Company has not included any purchase options available within its operating lease portfolio in its determination of its operating lease liability.
The future aggregate minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases are as follows:
13,646
10,532
8,967
Total future minimum lease payments
less: imputed interest
(45,158)
Total operating lease liability
122,239
less: operating lease liability - current
(10,917)
Total operating lease liability - non current
At December 31, 2019, the weighted average remaining lease term for operating leases is 15.6 years and the weighted average discount rate is 4.2%.
The Company has entered into finance lease arrangements for certain vehicles, computer and yard equipment and office furniture. The majority of the leases have a fixed term with a remaining life of one month to six years with renewal options included in the contracts. In certain of these leases, the Company has the option to purchase the leased asset at fair market value or a stated residual value at the end of the lease term. For certain leases such as vehicle leases the Company has included renewal options in the determination of its lease liabilities.
As at December 31, 2019, the net carrying amount of computer and yard equipment and other assets under capital leases is $23,258,000 (December 31, 2018: $14,976,000), and is included in the total property, plant and equipment as disclosed on the consolidated balance sheets.
Finance leases (continued)
Assets recorded under capital leases are as follows:
Net book
Computer equipment
15,314
(7,832)
7,482
Yard and others
21,525
(5,749)
15,776
36,839
(13,581)
23,258
9,428
(3,992)
5,436
12,125
(2,585)
9,540
21,553
(6,577)
14,976
The future aggregate minimum lease payments under non-cancellable finance leases are as follows:
7,014
5,160
3,443
1,462
(1,600)
Total finance lease liability
23,922
less: finance lease liability - current
(7,586)
Total finance lease liability - non current
At December 31, 2019, the weighted average remaining lease term for finance leases is 3.6 years and the weighted average discount rate is 4.0%.
Subleases
As at December 31, 2019, the total future minimum sublease payments expected to be received under non-cancellable subleases is $616,000 (2018: $1,187,000; 2017: $1,936,000). The lease expenditure charged to earnings during the year ended December 31, 2019 was $26,968,000 (2018: $27,734,000; 2017: $21,956,000).
26. Commitments
Commitments for expenditures
As at December 31, 2019, the Company had committed to, but not yet incurred, $2,697,000 in capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment and intangible assets (December 31, 2018: $1,151,000).
96
26. Commitments (continued)
Commitment for inventory purchase
The Company entered into a two-year non-rolling stock surplus contract with the U.S. Government Defense Logistics Agency (the “DLA”) in December 2017 with the option to extend for up to four-years. Pursuant to the contract, the original performance period commenced in April 2018 and concludes in March 2020. The Company has exercised its option for one year, extending the performance period to March 2021.
The Company has committed to purchase between 150,000 and 245,900 units of property with an expected minimum value of $11,104,000 and up to $51,028,000 annually to the extent that goods are available from the DLA over the initial 12 month period relating to the purchase of inventory. At December 31, 2019, the Company has purchased $33,727,000 pursuant to the 12 month period of this contract which commenced in April 2019.
27. Contingencies
Legal and other claims
The Company is subject to legal and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Management does not believe that the results of these claims will have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet or consolidated income statement.
Guarantee contracts
In the normal course of business, the Company will in certain situations guarantee to a consignor a minimum level of proceeds in connection with the sale at auction of that consignor’s equipment.
At December 31, 2019, there were $63,612,000 of assets guaranteed under contract, of which 39% is expected to be sold prior to March 31, 2020 with the remainder to be sold by June 30, 2020 (December 31, 2018: $41,461,000 of which 51% was expected to be sold prior to the end of March 31, 2019 with the remainder to be sold by May 31, 2020).
The outstanding guarantee amounts are undiscounted and before estimated proceeds from sale at auction.
28. Selected quarterly financial data (unaudited)
Certain comparative figures have been restated to conform to current presentation. The following is a summary of selected quarterly financial information (unaudited):
Operating
Net
Earnings per share
Revenues
income
First quarter
303,429
33,588
18,172
18,164
0.17
Second quarter
393,222
77,970
54,131
54,036
0.50
0.49
Third quarter
289,796
40,160
25,272
25,266
0.23
Fourth quarter
332,194
71,484
51,565
51,573
0.47
260,178
32,873
17,207
17,138
0.16
308,530
64,795
45,727
45,717
0.42
245,346
31,194
23,112
23,138
0.21
355,972
56,327
35,460
35,486
0.33
0.32
97
28. Selected quarterly financial data (unaudited) (continued)
Earnings (loss) per share
income (loss)
23,597
10,433
10,377
0.10
26,888
17,713
17,635
16,931
10,323
10,261
0.09
40,038
36,837
36,754
0.34
29. Business combinations
IronPlanet acquisition
On May 31, 2017 (the “IronPlanet Acquisition Date”), the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of IronPlanet for a total fair value consideration of $776,474,000. As at the acquisition date, cash consideration of $772,706,000, of which approximately $35,000,000 was placed in escrow, was paid to the former shareholders, vested option holders and warrant holders of IronPlanet. In addition to the cash consideration, non-cash consideration of $2,330,000 was issued attributable to the assumption of outstanding IronPlanet options, $1,771,000 was paid in cash and placed in escrow, related to customary closing adjustments, and $333,000 was related to settlement of intercompany payable transactions. Funds placed in escrow of $36,771,000 were released in March 2018.
A summary of the net cash flows and purchase price are detailed below
May 31, 2017
Cash consideration paid to former equity holders
723,810
Settlement of IronPlanet's debt
36,313
Settlement of IronPlanet's transaction costs
12,583
Cash consideration paid on closing
772,706
Cash consideration paid related to closing adjustments
1,771
Less: cash and cash equivalents acquired
(95,626)
Less: restricted cash acquired
(3,000)
Replacement stock option awards attributable to pre-combination services
4,926
Stock option compensation expense from accelerated vesting of awards attributable to post-combination services
(2,596)
Cash consideration paid relating to closing adjustments
Settlement of pre-existing intercompany balances
(333)
Purchase price
776,474
IronPlanet is a leading online marketplace for selling and buying used equipment and other durable assets and an innovative participant in the multi–billion dollar used equipment market. The acquisition expands the breadth and depth of equipment disposition and management solutions the Company can offer its customers.
The acquisition was accounted for in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. The assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values at the IronPlanet Acquisition Date. Goodwill of $568,566,000 was calculated as the fair value of consideration over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired.
98
29. Business combinations (continued)
IronPlanet acquisition (continued)
IronPlanet purchase price allocation
Assets acquired:
95,626
3,000
13,021
600
4,623
1,645
2,381
2,551
1,497
188,000
Liabilities assumed:
63,616
15,540
25,935
Fair value of identifiable net assets acquired
207,908
Goodwill acquired on acquisition
568,566
~ Intangible assets consist of indefinite-lived trade names and trademarks, customer relationships with estimated useful lives of ranging from six to 13 years, and a technology platform with an estimated useful life of seven years.
The main drivers generating goodwill are the anticipated synergies from (1) the Company’s auction expertise and transactional capabilities to IronPlanet’s existing customer base, (2) IronPlanet providing existing technology to the Company’s current customer base, and (3) future growth from international expansion and new Caterpillar dealers. Other factors generating goodwill include the acquisition of IronPlanet’s assembled work force and their associated technical expertise.
ITEM 9: CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
ITEM 9A: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management of the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K. The term “disclosure controls and procedures” means controls and other procedures established by the Company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Based upon their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the CEO and the CFO concluded that the disclosure controls are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and are effective to provide reasonable assurance that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.
The Company, including its CEO and CFO, does not expect that its internal controls and procedures will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In accordance with Item 308 of SEC Regulation S-K, management is required to provide an annual report regarding internal controls over our financial reporting. This report, which includes management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, is found below.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting for the Company as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s CEO and CFO, overseen by the Company’s Board of Directors and implemented by the Company’s management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and the requirements of the SEC.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
Management has assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. In making this assessment, management used the criteria described in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) (“COSO”). Based on its assessment under the framework in COSO, management has concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
Attestation Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm
The attestation report required under this Item 9A is set forth below under the caption “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management, with the participation of the CEO and CFO, concluded that there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the “COSO” criteria). In our opinion, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (the “Company”) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes and our report dated February 27, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
102
ITEM 9B: OTHER INFORMATION
On February 25, 2020, the Compensation Committee approved additional incentive bonuses of $143,437.50 to each of Sharon Driscoll and Karl Werner as part of their previously disclosed compensation arrangement in connection with their service as our Interim Co-Chief Executive Officers.
ITEM 10: DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information responsive to this Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2020 Annual and Special Meeting of Shareholders, to be filed 120 days of December 31, 2019, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the 2020 Proxy Statement).
We have adopted a written code of business conduct and ethics, which applies to all of our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial and accounting officer. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website, https://www.rbauction.com/cms_assets/pdf/corporate-governance/09-2018-Ritchie-Bros-Code-of-Business-Conduct-and-Ethics.pdf, and can be obtained by writing to Ritchie Bros. Investor Relations, 9500 Glenlyon Parkway, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5J 0C6 or by sending an email to our Investor Relations department at IR@ritchiebros.com. The information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any amendments, other than technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments, to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or waivers from the provisions of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our principal executive officer and our principal financial and accounting officer will be promptly disclosed on our website following the effective date of such amendment or waiver.
ITEM 11: EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information responsive to this Item is incorporated by reference to our 2020 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12: SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 13: CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
ITEM 14: PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 15: EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Documents Filed with this Report:
1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
None.
3. EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed in (b) below are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.
(b) Exhibits:
ExhibitNumber
Document
2.1*
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated August 29, 2016, by and among the Company, Topaz Mergersub, Inc., IronPlanet, and Fortis Advisors LLC (as representative of the indemnifying securityholders thereunder) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 31, 2016)
3.1
Articles of Amalgamation and Amendments (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
3.2
Amended and Restated By-law No. 1 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 6-K furnished on February 27, 2015)
4.1
Amended and Restated Shareholder Rights Plan Agreement dated as of February 28, 2019, between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated and Computershare Investor Services, Inc., as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 28, 2019)
4.2
Description of the Company’s Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act
4.3
Indenture, dated as of December 21, 2016, among the Company, the guarantors party thereto and US Bank National Association, as trustee, relating to the Company’s 5.375% Senior Notes due 2025 (includes form of note) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2016)
10.1#
Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, dated May 2, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2016)
10.2#
Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.3#
Amended and Restated Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.4#
Non-Executive Director Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.5#
Amended and Restated Senior Executive Restricted Share Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed on November 9, 2017)
10.6#
Form of Restricted Share Unit Grant Agreement for Amended and Restated Senior Executive Restricted Share Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 26, 2018)
10.7#
Form of Restricted Share Unit Special Grant Agreement for Amended and Restated Senior Executive Restricted Share Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 26, 2018)
10.8#
Amended and Restated Employee Restricted Share Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed on November 9, 2017)
10.9#
Form of Restricted Share Unit Grant Agreement for Amended and Restated Employee Restricted Share Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 26, 2018)
10.10#
Amended and Restated Non-Executive Director Deferred Share Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 26, 2018)
10.11#
Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan (United States 10/10 Program) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.12#
Amended Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2018)
10.13#
Canada and All Non-United States Locations: 10/10 Compensation Arrangement (Canada 10/10 Program) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.14#
Senior Executive Performance Share Unit Plan (March 2015) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.15#
Amendment No. 1 to Senior Executive Performance Share Unit Plan dated August 8, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 11, 2018)
10.16#
Form of Performance Share Unit Grant Agreement for Senior Executive Performance Share Unit Plan (March 2015) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.17#
Employee Performance Share Unit Plan (March 2015) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.18#
Amendment No. 1 to Employee Performance Share Unit Plan dated August 8, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 11, 2018)
10.19#
Form of Performance Share Unit Grant Agreement for Employee Performance Share Unit Plan (March 2015) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.20#
1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended December 14, 2017) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed February 26, 2018)
10.21#
Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (Canada) Ltd. and Ann Fandozzi, dated December 14, 2019
10.22#
Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. and Jim Barr, dated November 3, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.23#
Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. and Karl Werner, dated January 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.24#
Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (Canada) Ltd. and Todd Wohler, dated January 6, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.25#
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (Canada) Ltd. and Todd Wohler, dated January 20, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.26#
Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. and Kieran Holm, dated March 29, 2017 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2018)
105
10.27#
Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (Canada) Ltd. and Darren Watt, dated May 25, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.28#
Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (Canada) Ltd. and Sharon Driscoll, dated May 20, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.29#
Form of Change of Control Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.30#
Form of Indemnity Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.31
Lease Agreement with Great-West Life Assurance Company and London Life Insurance Company dated August 12, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.32
Development Agreement with Great-West Life Assurance Company and London Life Insurance Company dated August 12, 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.33
Pre-Handover Occupancy Rental Agreement and Amendment to Development Agreement with Great-West Life Assurance Company and London Life Insurance Company dated November 25, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.34
Lease Modification Agreement with Great-West Life Assurance Company and London Life Insurance Company dated February 12, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.35
Lease Confirmation and Amendment to Development Agreement with Great-West Life Assurance Company and London Life Insurance Company dated May 6, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.43 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.36#
Summary of Short-term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.44 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 25, 2016)
10.37#
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (Canada) Ltd. and Sharon Driscoll, dated February 26, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‐K filed on February 21, 2017)
10.38#
Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (Canada) Ltd. and Marianne Marck, dated February 29, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on May 9, 2016)
10.39**
Strategic Alliance and Remarketing Agreement, entered into as of August 29, 2016, by and between the Company, IronPlanet, Inc. and Caterpillar, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2016)
10.40
Amended and Restated Commitment Letter, dated September 16, 2016, from Goldman Sachs Bank USA and Royal Bank of Canada (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2016)
10.41
Credit Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2016, by and among the Company, the other borrowers and guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, U.S. swing line lender and L/C issuer, Royal Bank of Canada, as Canadian swing line lender and L/C issuer, and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on November 4, 2016)
10.42
First Amendment, dated as of January 17, 2017, to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2016, by and among the Company, the other borrowers and guarantors party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, U.S. swing line lender and L/C issuer, Royal Bank of Canada, as Canadian swing line lender and L/C issuer, and the other lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.50 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‐K filed on February 21, 2017)
106
10.43#
IronPlanet, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed on June 1, 2017)
10.44#
Form of Stock Option Agreement for IronPlanet, Inc. 1999 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2017)
10.45#
IronPlanet Holdings, Inc. 2015 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-8 filed on June 1, 2017)
10.46#
Form of Stock Option Agreement for IronPlanet Holdings, Inc. 2015 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2017)
10.47#
Form of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated Stock Option Assumption Notice (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2017)
10.48#
Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. and Douglas Feick, dated August 29, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2017)
10.49#
Employment Agreement between Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (America) Inc. and James Jeter, dated August 28, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2017)
21.1
List of Company Subsidiaries
23.1
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
Cover Page for the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in Inline XBRL
# Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
* Schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The registrant will furnish copies of any such schedules to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
** Certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and have been filed separately with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 16: FORM 10-K SUMMARY
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 27, 2020
By:
/s/ Ann Fandozzi
Ann FandozziChief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)
Ann Fandozzi
/s/ Sharon R. Driscoll
Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
Sharon R. Driscoll
/s/ Beverley A. Briscoe
Chair of the Board
Beverley A. Briscoe
/s/ Robert G. Elton
Director
Robert G. Elton
/s/ Erik Olsson
Erik Olsson
/s/ Sarah Raiss
Sarah E. Raiss
/s/ Christopher Zimmerman
Christopher Zimmerman
/s/ Amy Guggenheim Skenkan
Amy Guggenheim Skenkan
/s/ Kim Fennell
Kim Fennell
108