RB Global - 40-F annual report

(Check One)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant by filing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. If “Yes” is marked, indicate the filing number assigned to the Registrant in connection with such Rule.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

          This Annual Report on Form 40-F and documents incorporated by reference contain forward-looking statements (as such term is defined under the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on current expectations and estimates about the Company’s business and include, among others, statements relating to :

          In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “ongoing,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “would,” or the negative of these terms, and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company’s forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. While the Company has not described all potential risks related to its business, the important factors listed under “Risk Factors” in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” attached as Exhibit 3 to this Report on Form 40-F are among those factors that may affect the Company’s performance and could cause actual financial and operational results to differ significantly from the Company’s predictions. The Company does not intend to update publicly any forward-looking statements, even if its predictions have been affected by new information, future events or other developments.

     The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of Ritchie Bros.’ disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of December 31, 2005. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

     There were no changes in Ritchie Bros.’ internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect Ritchie Bros.’ internal control over financial reporting. There were no significant changes in Ritchie Bros.’ internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation.

     The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer do not expect that Ritchie Bros.’ disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple mistake or error. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based partly on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

     The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that it has at least one audit committee financial expert serving on its Audit Committee. Mr. G. Edward Moul has been determined to be such audit committee financial expert and is independent, as that term is defined by the New York Stock Exchange’s corporate governance listing standards applicable to the Company. The SEC has indicated that the designation of Mr. Moul as an audit committee financial expert does not make Mr. Moul an “expert” for any purpose, impose any duties, obligations or liability on Mr. Moul that are greater than those imposed on members of the Audit Committee and Board of Directors who do not carry this designation, or affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the Audit Committee.

     Mr. Moul has indicated that he will not stand for re-election to the Company’s Board of Directors at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 13, 2006. It is intended that another member of the Audit Committee will be determined to be the audit committee financial expert after the Annual Meeting.

     The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to all employees and officers. The Code of Conduct includes, among other things, written standards for the Company’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer that are required by the SEC for a code of ethics applicable to such officers. The Code of Conduct is available at the Company’s internet website, www.rbauction.com. The Company intends to disclose on its website within five days following the date of any such amendment or waiver, any amendment or waiver of the code of ethics portion of its Code of Conduct applicable to these officers that is required by SEC rules or regulations to be disclosed publicly, and to keep such disclosure available on the website for at least a 12-month period.

     KPMG LLP and predecessor firms have served as Ritchie Bros.’ auditing firm since 1974. The aggregate fees billed by KPMG LLP and its affiliates during fiscal 2005 and 2004 are detailed below.

     Audit fees were paid for professional services rendered by the auditors for the audit and interim reviews of the Company’s consolidated financial statements or services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

     Audit-related fees were paid for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported under the Audit Fees item above.

     Tax fees were paid for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning professional services. These services consisted of: tax compliance, including the review of original and amended tax returns; assistance with questions regarding tax audits; assistance in completing routine tax schedules and calculations; and tax planning and advisory services relating to common forms of domestic and international taxation (i.e., income tax, capital tax, Goods and Services Tax and Value Added Tax).

     The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of services other than audit services is compatible with maintaining the auditors’ independence and has adopted a policy governing the provision of these services. This policy requires the pre-approval by the Audit Committee of all audit and non-audit services provided by the external auditor, other than any de minimus non-audit services allowed by applicable law or regulation. The policy outlines the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which permissible services proposed to be performed by KPMG LLP are pre-approved, provides a general pre-approval for certain permissible services and outlines a list of prohibited services. For fiscal 2005, less than 5% of the fees for the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the de minimus exemption.

     All requests for KPMG LLP to provide services that do not require specific approval by the Audit Committee are reported to and documented by the Company’s Corporate Secretary. If the proposed services are not covered by a pre-approval and the estimated fees for the proposed engagement are more than CA$5,000, the engagement of KPMG LLP to provide such services requires specific approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed engagement to provide services that requires specific approval by the Audit Committee pursuant to the terms of the policy is submitted to the Corporate Secretary for presentation to the Audit Committee for its consideration.

     Additional information regarding the Company’s corporate governance practices is included in its Information Circular for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and on the Company’s internet website at www.rbauction.com.

     The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

     The following table provides information about the Company’s aggregate known contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005:

     The Company’s operating leases related primarily to land on which it operates regional auction units. The properties subject to lease are located in the United States, Australia, Singapore, Italy, Mexico, Canada and the United Arab Emirates.

     The Company’s Board of Directors has a separately-designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the purpose of overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of the Company and audits of the Company’s annual financial statements. As of the date of this Report, the members of the Audit Committee include Eric Patel, Beverley A. Briscoe and G. Edward Moul. Mr. Moul serves as Chair of the Committee. Mr. Moul has indicated to the Company’s Board of Directors that he will not stand for reelection at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders on April 13, 2006. The Board anticipates that, subject to her being re-elected to the Board at the Annual Meeting, Ms. Briscoe will be appointed Chair of the Audit Committee and a new member will be appointed to the Committee to replace Mr. Moul.

     The Registrant undertakes to make available, in person or by telephone, representatives to respond to inquiries made by the SEC staff, and to furnish promptly, when requested to do so by the SEC staff, information relating to: the securities registered pursuant to Form 40-F; the securities in relation to which the obligation to file an annual report on Form 40-F arises; or transactions in said securities.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 40-F and has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.