Saga Communications - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o     Accelerated filer þ      Non-accelerated filer o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ.

 

The number of shares of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value, and Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of October 31, 2007 was 17,888,828 and 2,393,246, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note: The balance sheet at December 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements.

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions toForm 10-Qand Article 10 ofRegulation S-X.Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for annual financial statements.

 

In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements include all adjustments of a normal, recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position as of September 30, 2007 and the results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. Results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2007.

 

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Saga Communications, Inc. Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006.

 

 

Our effective tax rate is higher than the federal statutory rate as a result of certain non-deductible depreciation and amortization expenses and the inclusion of state taxes in the income tax amount.

 

 

Revenue from the sale of commercial broadcast time to advertisers is recognized when commercials are broadcast. Revenue is reported net of advertising agency commissions. Agency commissions, when applicable, are based on a stated percentage applied to gross billing.

 

 

We have entered into Time Brokerage Agreements (“TBA’s”) or Local Marketing Agreements (“LMA’s”) in certain markets. In a typical TBA/LMA, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licensee of a station makes available, for a fee, blocks of air time on its station to another party that supplies programming to be broadcast during that air time and sells its own commercial advertising announcements during the time periods specified. We account for TBA’s/LMA’s under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 13, “Accounting for Leases” and related interpretations. Revenue and expenses related toTBA’s/LMA’sare included in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

 

In September 2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a consensus on EITF IssueNo. 06-4,“Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.” EITFNo. 06-4requires that for endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements that provide a benefit to an employee that extends to postretirement periods, an employer should recognize a liability for future benefits in accordance with SFAS No. 106 (if, in substance, a postretirement benefit plan exists) or Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 12 (if the arrangement is, in substance, an individual deferred compensation contract) based on the substantive agreement with the employee. EITF IssueNo. 06-4is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact of EITF IssueNo. 06-4on its financial position and results of operations.

 

On September 15, 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities.

 

 

 

SFAS 157 also responds to investors’ requests for more information about: (1) the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value; (2) the information used to measure fair value; and (3) the effect that fair value measurements have on earnings. SFAS 157 will apply whenever another standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. SFAS 157 does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. SFAS 157 is effective January 1, 2008, and we are currently evaluating its impact and effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

 

On July 13, 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes and Related Implementation Issues,” (“FIN 48”) that provides guidance on the financial statement recognition, measurement, and presentation and disclosure of certain tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return. Under FIN 48, financial statements should reflect expected future tax consequences of such positions presuming the taxing authorities have full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. The Company was required to adopt the provisions of FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

 

Under SFAS No. 142 “Accounting for Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” (“SFAS 142”) goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized and are subject to annual, or more frequent if impairment indicators arise, impairment tests.

 

We consider FCC broadcast licenses to have indefinite lives. Factors that we considered in evaluating that the radio and television FCC licenses are indefinite-lived intangible assets under SFAS 142 include the following:

 

 

Based on the above, we believe cash flows from our radio and television licenses are expected to continue indefinitely.

 

Separable intangible assets that have finite lives are amortized over their useful lives using the straight-line method. Favorable lease agreements are amortized over the lives of the leases. Other intangibles are amortized over five to forty years.

 

 

 

 

The following summarizes information relating to the number of shares of our common stock issued in connection with stock transactions through September 30, 2007:

 

 

We have a Stock Buy-Back Program (the “Buy-Back Program”) to allow us to purchase up to $30,000,000 of our Class A Common Stock. From its inception in 1998 through September 30, 2007, we have repurchased 1,907,210 shares of our Class A Common Stock for approximately $26,252,000.

 

 

We actively seek and explore opportunities for expansion through the acquisition of additional broadcast properties. The condensed consolidated statements of income include the operating results of the acquired stations from their respective dates of acquisition. All acquisitions were accounted for as purchases and, accordingly, the total costs were allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on their estimated fair values as of the acquisition dates. The excess of consideration paid over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired has been recorded as goodwill, which is deductible for tax purposes.

 

 

On January 21, 2004, we entered into agreements to acquire an FM radio station(WOXL-FM)serving the Asheville, North Carolina market, for approximately $8,000,000. We are currently providing programming toWOXL-FMunder a Sub-Time Brokerage Agreement. This transaction is subject to the approval of the FCC and has been contested. We expect to close on the acquisition when all required approvals are obtained.

 

On November 1, 2007, we acquired an FM radio station(WCLZ-FM)serving the Portland, Maine market for approximately $3,500,000. This acquisition is a fourth quarter transaction and accordingly is not included in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements at September 30, 2007.

 

 

On August 31, 2007, we acquired two radio stations(WKRT-AM andWIII-FMlicensed to Cortland, New York, and an FM translator station that rebroadcasts WIII) serving the Ithaca, New York market for approximately $3,843,000. Due to FCC ownership rules we were not permitted to own WKRT-AM and as part of the transaction we donatedWKRT-AM to a non-profit organization.

 

 

 

On January 2, 2007, we acquired one FM radio station(WCNR-FM)serving the Charlottesville, Virginia market for $3,330,000. On September 1, 2006 we began providing programming under an LMA toWCNR-FM. We funded this acquisition on December 31, 2006.

 

On January 16, 2007, we agreed to pay $50,000 to cancel a clause in our 2003 purchase agreement ofWSNI-FM in the Winchendon, Massachusetts market that would require us to pay the seller an additional $500,000 if within five years of closing we obtained approval from the FCC for a city of license change.

 

On January 2, 2007, in connection with the 2003 acquisition of one FM radio station(WJZA-FM)serving the Columbus, Ohio market, we paid an additional $850,000 to the seller upon obtaining approval from the FCC for a city of license change.

 

 

On August 7, 2006, we acquired one FM radio station(WTMT-FM)serving the Tazewell, Tennessee market for approximately $4,186,000 of which approximately $789,000 was paid in 2006, $2,047,000 was paid in 2007, and $1,350,000 is recorded as a note payable at September 30, 2007. We relocated the tower to Weaverville, North Carolina (serving the Asheville, North Carolina market) and started broadcasting in Asheville on June 8, 2007.

 

In October 2006, we acquired a tower, antenna and transmitter and entered into agreements with another radio station in connection with the city of license change forWJZA-FMmentioned above for approximately $2,069,000.

 

 

 

 

The following unaudited condensed balance sheets represent the estimated fair value assigned to the related assets and liabilities of the 2007 and 2006 acquisitions at their respective acquisition dates. We paid approximately $6,761,000 and $779,000 in connection with acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following unaudited pro forma results of our operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 assume the 2007 and 2006 acquisitions occurred as of January 1, 2006. The 2006 acquisition and LMA are start up stations and therefore, have no pro forma revenue and expenses. The pro forma results give effect to certain adjustments, including depreciation, amortization of intangible assets, increased interest expense on acquisition debt and related income tax effects. The pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to indicate the results of operations which would actually have occurred had the combinations been in effect on the dates indicated or which may occur in the future.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Company accounts for stock-based awards under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment”(“SFAS 123R”). Compensation expense of $259,000, and $684,000, respectively, and related tax benefits of $106,000 and $280,000, respectively, was recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company recognized compensation expense of $229,000 and $556,000, respectively, and related tax benefits of $94,000 and $228,000, respectively. Compensation expense is reported in corporate general and administrative expenses in the results of operations.

 

 

 

 

We have an employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) for all eligible employees. Each quarter, an eligible employee may elect to withhold up to 10 percent of his or her compensation, up to a maximum of $5,000, to purchase shares of our stock at a price equal to 85% of the fair value of the stock as of the last day of such quarter. The ESPP will terminate on the earlier of the issuance of 1,562,500 shares pursuant to the ESPP or December 31, 2008. Approximately 15,425 and 19,217 shares were purchased under the ESPP during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Our ESPP is deemed compensatory under the provisions of SFAS 123R.

 

 

On May 9, 2005, our stockholders approved the 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2005 Plan”) which replaces our 2003 Stock Option Plan (the “2003 Plan”) as to future grants. The 2005 Plan extends through March 2015 and allows for the granting of restricted stock, restricted stock units, incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, and performance awards to officers and a selected number of employees.

 

 

In 2003, we adopted the 2003 Plan, upon expiration of our 1992 Stock Option Plan (the “1992 Plan”) in December 2002, pursuant to which our key employees, including directors who are employees, were eligible to receive grants of options to purchase our Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock. Options granted under the 2003 Plan were either incentive stock options (within the meaning of Section 422A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) or non-qualified options. With the approval of the 2005 Plan, the 2003 Plan was terminated as to future grants, therefore the shares available for future grants under the 2003 Plan are no longer available.

 

 

In 1997, we adopted the 1997 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the “Directors Plan”) pursuant to which our directors who are not our employees are eligible to receive options. Under the terms of the Directors Plan, on the last business day of January of each year during the term of the Directors Plan, in lieu of their directors’ retainer for the previous year, each eligible director shall automatically be granted an option to purchase that number of our shares of Class A Common Stock equal to the amount of the retainer divided by the fair market value of our Common Stock on the last trading day of the December immediately preceding the date of grant less $.01 per share. The option exercise price is $.01 per share. Options granted under the Directors Plan are non-qualified stock options, shall be immediately vested and become exercisable at the written election of the director. The options expire on the earlier of (i) 10 years from the date of grant or (ii) the March 16th following the calendar year in which they first become exercisable. This plan expired on May 12, 2007.

 

Effective January 1, 2007, each director who is not an employee shall receive cash for his or her services as a director.

 

 

 

The following summarizes the stock option transactions for the 2005, 2003 and 1992 Plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2007:

 

 

The following summarizes the non-vested stock option transactions for the 2005, 2003 and 1992 Plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2007:

 

 

We calculated the fair value of the each option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following assumptions were used for each respective period:

 

 

The estimated expected volatility, expected term of options and estimated annual forfeiture rates were determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

 

 

 

The following summarizes the restricted stock transactions for nine months ended September 30, 2007:

 

 

The Company had approximately $307,000 and $246,000 of total compensation expense related to restricted stock-based arrangements for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

 

The following summarizes the stock option transactions for the Directors Plans for the nine month ended September 30, 2007:

 

 

 

Long term debt consisted of the following:

 

 

Our Credit Agreement is a $200,000,000 reducing revolving line of credit maturing on July 29, 2012. Our indebtedness under the Credit Agreement is secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of our assets and of our subsidiaries, by a pledge of our subsidiaries’ stock and by a guarantee of our subsidiaries. We have approximately $71,150,000 of unused borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement at September 30, 2007.

 

On March 31, 2008, the Revolving Commitments (as defined in the Credit Agreement) will be permanently reduced quarterly in amounts ranging from 3.125% to 12.5% of the total Revolving Commitments in effect on March 31, 2008. Any outstanding balance under the Credit Agreement will be due on the maturity date of July 29, 2012. In addition, the Revolving Commitments shall be further reduced by specified percentages of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement) based on leverage ratios.

 

 

 

The Credit Agreement contains a number of financial covenants (all of which we were in compliance with at September 30, 2007) that, among other things, requires us to maintain specified financial ratios and impose certain limitations on us with respect to (i) the incurrence of additional indebtedness; (ii) acquisitions, except under specified conditions; (iii) the incurrence of additional liens, except those relating to capital leases and purchase money indebtedness; (iv) the disposition of assets; (v) the payment of cash dividends; and (vi) mergers, changes in business and management, investments and transactions with affiliates. The financial covenants become more restrictive over the life of the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement allows for the payment of dividends provided certain requirements are met.

 

 

We evaluate the operating performance of our markets individually. For purposes of business segment reporting, we have aligned operations with similar characteristics into two business segments: Radio and Television.

 

The Radio segment includes twenty-three markets, which includes all ninety of our radio stations and five radio information networks. The Television segment includes three markets and consists of five television stations and four low power television (“LPTV”) stations. The Radio and Television segments derive their revenue from the sale of commercial broadcast inventory. The category “Corporate general and administrative” represents the income and expense not allocated to reportable segments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Saga Communications, Inc. and its subsidiaries contained elsewhere herein and the audited financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis contained in our Annual Report onForm 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2006. The following discussion is presented on both a consolidated and segment basis. Corporate general and administrative expenses, interest expense, other (income) expense, and income tax expense are managed on a consolidated basis and are, therefore, reflected only in our discussion of consolidated results.

 

Our discussion of the results of operations of our operating segments focuses on their operating income because we manage our operating segments primarily on their operating income. We evaluate the operating performance of our markets individually. For purposes of business segment reporting, we have aligned operations with similar characteristics into two business segments: Radio and Television. The Radio segment includes twenty-three markets, which includes all ninety of our radio stations and five radio information networks. The Television segment includes three markets and consists of five television stations and four LPTV stations.

 

 

We are a broadcast company primarily engaged in acquiring, developing and operating radio and television stations. We actively seek and explore opportunities for expansion through the acquisition of additional broadcast properties. We review acquisition opportunities on an ongoing basis.

 

For additional information with respect to acquisitions, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.

 

 

Our radio segment’s primary source of revenue is from the sale of advertising for broadcast on our stations. Depending on the format of a particular radio station, there are a predetermined number of advertisements available to be broadcast each hour.

 

Most advertising contracts are short-term, and generally run only for a few weeks. Most of our revenue is generated from local advertising, which is sold primarily by each radio markets’ sales staff. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, approximately 86% and 85%, respectively, of our gross radio segment revenue was from local advertising. To generate national advertising sales, we engage an independent advertising sales representative firm that specializes in national sales for each of our broadcast markets.

 

Our revenue varies throughout the year. Advertising expenditures, our primary source of revenue, generally have been lowest during the winter months, which include the first quarter of each year.

 

Our net operating revenue, station operating expense and operating income varies from market to market based upon the related market’s rank or size which is based upon population and the available radio advertising revenue in that particular market.

 

Our financial results are dependent on a number of factors, the most significant of which is our ability to generate advertising revenue through rates charged to advertisers. The rates a station is able to charge are, in large part, based on a station’s ability to attract audiences in the demographic groups targeted by its advertisers. In a number of our markets this is measured by periodic reports generated by independent national rating services. In the remainder of our markets it is measured by the results advertisers obtain through the actual running of an advertising schedule. Advertisers measure these results based on increased demand for their goods or servicesand/oractual revenues generated from such demand. Various factors affect the rate a station can charge, including the general strength of the local and national economies, population growth, ability to provide popular programming, local market competition, target marketing capability of radio compared to other advertising media and signal strength. Because reaching a large and demographically attractive audience is crucial to a station’s financial success, we endeavor to develop strong listener loyalty. When we acquireand/or begin to operate a station or group of stations we generally increase programming

and advertising and promotion expenses to increase our share of our target demographic audience. Our strategy sometimes requires levels of spending commensurate with the revenue levels we plan on achieving in two to five years. During periods of economic downturns, or when the level of advertising spending is flat or down across the industry, this strategy may result in the appearance that our cost of operations are increasing at a faster rate than our growth in revenues, until such time as we achieve our targeted levels of revenue for the acquired station or group of stations.

 

The number of advertisements that can be broadcast without jeopardizing listening levels (and the resulting ratings) is limited in part by the format of a particular radio station. Our stations strive to maximize revenue by constantly managing the number of commercials available for sale and adjusting prices based upon local market conditions and ratings. While there may be shifts from time to time in the number of advertisements broadcast during a particular time of the day, the total number of advertisements broadcast on a particular station generally does not vary significantly from year to year. Any change in our revenue, with the exception of those instances where stations are acquired or sold, is generally the result of inventory sell out ratios and pricing adjustments, which are made to ensure that the station efficiently utilizes available inventory.

 

Our radio stations employ a variety of programming formats. We periodically perform market research, including music evaluations, focus groups and strategic vulnerability studies. Our stations also employ audience promotions to further develop and secure a loyal following. We believe that the diversification of formats on our radio stations helps to insulate us from the effects of changes in musical tastes of the public on any particular format.

 

The primary operating expenses involved in owning and operating radio stations are employee salaries, depreciation, programming expenses, advertising costs and promotion expenses.

 

During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, our Columbus, Ohio; Manchester, New Hampshire; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and Norfolk, Virginia markets, when combined, represented approximately 62%, 70%, 64% and 75%, respectively, of our consolidated operating income. An adverse change in any of these radio markets or our relative market position in those markets could have a significant impact on our operating results as a whole. A decrease in the total available radio advertising dollars in the Columbus, Ohio and Norfolk, Virginia markets has resulted in a decline in our revenue and related operating income in our radio stations there. Additionally, we are experiencing ratings softness in the Columbus and Norfolk markets which has also affected revenue. None of our television markets represented more than 15% or more of our consolidated operating income. The following tables describe the percentage of our consolidated operating income represented by each of these markets:

 

 

We utilize certain financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) to assess our financial performance. For example, we evaluate the performance of our markets based on “station operating income” (operating income plus corporate general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization). Station operating income is generally recognized by the broadcasting industry as a measure of performance, is used by analysts who

report on the performance of the broadcasting industry and it serves as an indicator of the market value of a group of stations. In addition, we use it to evaluate individual stations, market-level performance, overall operations and as a primary measure for incentive based compensation of executives and other members of management. Station operating income is not necessarily indicative of amounts that may be available to us for debt service requirements, other commitments, reinvestment or other discretionary uses. Station operating income is not a measure of liquidity or of performance in accordance with GAAP, and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for our results of operations presented on a GAAP basis.

 

During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 and the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the radio stations in our four largest markets when combined, represented approximately 41%, 47%, 45% and 48%, respectively, of our consolidated station operating income. The following tables describe the percentage of our consolidated station operating income represented by each of these markets:

 

 

 

 

Our television segment’s primary source of revenue is from the sale of advertising for broadcast on our stations. The number of advertisements available for broadcast on our television stations is limited by network affiliation and syndicated programming agreements and, with respect to children’s programs, federal regulation. Our television stations’ local market managers determine only the number of advertisements to be broadcast in locally produced programs, which are primarily news programming and occasionally local sports or information shows.

 

Our net operating revenue, station operating expense and operating income vary from market to market based upon the market’s rank or size, which is based upon population, available television advertising revenue in that particular market, and the popularity of programming being broadcast.

 

Our financial results are dependent on a number of factors, the most significant of which is our ability to generate advertising revenue through rates charged to advertisers. The rates a station is able to charge are, in large part, based on a station’s ability to attract audiences in the demographic groups targeted by its advertisers, as measured principally by periodic reports by independent national rating services. Various factors affect the rate a station can charge, including the general strength of the local and national economies, population growth, ability to provide popular programming through locally produced news, sports and weather and as a result of syndication and network affiliation agreements, local market competition, the ability of television broadcasting to reach a mass appeal market compared to other advertising media, and signal strength including cable/satellite coverage, and government regulation and policies. When we acquireand/or begin operating a station or group of stations we generally increase programming expenses including local news, sports and weather programming, new syndicated programming, and advertising and promotion expenses to increase our viewership. Our strategy sometimes requires levels of spending commensurate with the revenue levels we plan on achieving in two to five years. During periods of economic downturns, or when the level of advertising spending is flat or down across the industry, this strategy may result in the appearance that our

cost of operations are increasing at a faster rate than our growth in revenues, until such time as we achieve our targeted levels of revenue for the acquired/operated station or group of stations.

 

Our stations strive to maximize revenue by continually adjusting prices for commercial spots based upon local market conditions, advertising demand and ratings. While there may be shifts from time to time in the number of advertisements broadcast during a particular time of the day, the total number of advertisements broadcast on a station generally does not vary significantly from year to year. Any change in our revenue, with the exception of those instances where stations are acquired or sold, is generally the result of pricing adjustments, which are made to ensure that the station efficiently utilizes available inventory.

 

Because audience ratings in the local market are crucial to a station’s financial success, we endeavor to develop strong viewer loyalty by providing locally produced news, weather and sports programming. We believe that this emphasis on the local market provides us with the viewer loyalty we are trying to achieve.

 

Most of our revenue is generated from local advertising, which is sold primarily by each television markets’ sales staff. For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, approximately 80% and 81%, respectively, of our gross television revenue was from local advertising. To generate national advertising sales, we engage independent advertising sales representatives that specialize in national sales for each of our television markets.

 

Our revenue varies throughout the year. Advertising expenditures, our primary source of revenue, generally have been lowest during the winter months, which include the first quarter of each year.

 

The primary operating expenses involved in owning and operating television stations are employee salaries including commissions, depreciation, programming expenses including news production and the cost of acquiring certain syndicated programming, advertising costs and promotion expenses.

 

 

 

The following tables summarize our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/M = Not Meaningful

 

 

 

 

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2007, consolidated net operating revenue was $36,218,000 compared with $35,791,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $427,000 or 1%. We had an increase of approximately $125,000 in revenue generated by stations that we owned or operated for the comparable period in 2006 (“same station”), and an increase of approximately $302,000 in revenue attributable to stations we did not own and operate for the entire comparable period. The increase in same station revenue was attributable primarily to a 7% increase in national revenue (excluding political), offset by a decrease in gross political revenue of $422,000.

Station operating expense was $25,975,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared with $25,761,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $214,000. Approximately $108,000 of the increase was attributable to stations we owned and operated for the entire comparable period, and $106,000 is attributable to those stations we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period. The increase in same station operating expense was primarily due to an increase in depreciation and an increase in station general and administrative expense, partially offset by a decrease in programming costs.

 

Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $7,971,000 compared to $7,805,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $166,000 or 2%. The increase in operating revenue is directly attributable to stations we did not own and operate for the entire comparable period.

 

We generated net income of approximately $3,321,000 ($.17 per share on a fully diluted basis) during the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared with $3,264,000 ($.16 per share on a fully diluted basis) for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an improvement of approximately $57,000 or 2%. The increase was the result of the $166,000 increase in operating income as discussed above and a $92,000 decrease in interest expense offset by an increase of $135,000 in other expense and a $66,000 increase in income tax expense. The decrease in interest expense resulted primarily from a decrease in debt. The increase in income tax expense is directly attributable to the increase in pre-tax income.

 

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2007, net operating revenue of the radio segment was $31,904,000 compared with $31,402,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of $502,000 or 2%. During 2007 we had an increase in net operating revenue of approximately $302,000 attributable to stations we did not own and operate for the entire comparable period. We had an increase of approximately $200,000 or less than 1% in net revenue generated by radio stations that we owned or operated for the comparable period in 2006 (“same station”). The increase in same station revenue was directly attributable to an increase in same station local revenue. Although same station national revenue increased approximately 4%, this increase was offset by same station gross political revenue decreases of approximately $220,000.

 

Station operating expense for the radio segment was $22,492,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2007, compared with $22,300,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $192,000. The increase in station operating expense for the radio segment represents an increase of approximately $86,000 in same station operating expense and an increase of $106,000 from the operation of radio stations that we did not own or operate for the comparable period in 2006. The increase in same station operating expense was primarily due to an increase in depreciation and an increase in station general and administrative expense, partially offset by a decrease in programming costs.

 

Operating income in the radio segment for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $9,412,000 compared to $9,102,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $310,000 or 3%. The increase was the result of a $502,000 increase in net operating revenue offset by a $192,000 increase in station operating expense discussed above.

 

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2007, net operating revenue of our television segment was $4,314,000 compared with $4,389,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of $75,000 or 2%. The majority of the decline in net operating revenue was attributable to an increase in national revenue (excluding political) of approximately 21%, offset by a decrease in gross political revenue of approximately $202,000.

Station operating expense in the television segment for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $3,483,000, compared with $3,461,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, an increase of approximately $22,000.

 

Operating income in the television segment for the three months ended September 30, 2007 was $831,000 compared to $928,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, a decrease of approximately $97,000. The decrease was a direct result of the decrease in net operating revenue and the small increase in station operating expense.

 

 

The following tables summarize our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.