Table of Contents
G3
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☒
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2020
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-12669
SOUTH STATE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
South Carolina
57-0799315
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1101 First Street South, Suite 202
Winter Haven, Florida
33880
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(863) 293-4710
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class:
Trading Symbol
Name of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, $2.50 par value
SSB
The Nasdaq Global Select Market
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ◻
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data file required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer ☒
Accelerated Filer ☐
Non-Accelerated Filer ☐
Smaller Reporting Company ☐
Emerging Growth Company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class
Outstanding as of November 4, 2020
70,949,737
South State Corporation and Subsidiary
September 30, 2020 Form 10-Q
INDEX
Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019
5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019
6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Nine Months Ended September, 2020 and 2019
7
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020 and 2019
8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
9
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
60
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
93
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
94
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
96
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
97
Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5.
Other Information
98
Item 6.
Exhibits
2
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Dollars in thousands, except par value)
September 30,
December 31,
2020
2019
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks
$
344,389
262,019
258,357
Federal funds sold and interest-bearing deposits with banks
3,199,101
377,692
396,804
Deposits in other financial institutions (restricted cash)
928,149
48,993
64,033
Total cash and cash equivalents
4,471,639
688,704
719,194
Investment securities:
Securities available for sale, at fair value (cost of $3,498,087 and allowance for credit losses of $0 for September 30, 2020)
3,561,929
1,956,047
1,813,134
Other investments
185,199
49,124
Total investment securities
3,747,128
2,005,171
1,862,258
Loans held for sale
456,141
59,363
87,393
Loans:
Acquired - non-purchased credit deteriorated loans
10,557,907
1,760,427
1,965,603
Acquired - purchased credit deteriorated loans (formerly acquired credit-impaired loans)
3,143,822
356,782
390,714
Non-acquired
11,536,086
9,252,831
8,928,512
Less allowance for credit losses
(440,159)
(56,927)
(54,937)
Loans, net
24,797,656
11,313,113
11,229,892
Other real estate owned
13,480
6,539
8,424
Bank property held for sale
24,504
5,425
4,991
Premises and equipment, net
626,259
317,321
323,506
Bank owned life insurance
556,475
234,567
233,206
Deferred tax assets
107,500
31,316
27,844
Derivatives assets
953,036
15,463
24,316
Mortgage servicing rights
34,578
30,525
28,674
Core deposit and other intangibles
171,637
49,816
53,083
Goodwill
1,566,524
1,002,900
Other assets
292,809
160,869
146,401
Total assets
37,819,366
15,921,092
15,752,082
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing
9,681,095
3,245,306
3,307,532
Interest-bearing
20,288,859
8,931,790
8,716,255
Total deposits
29,969,954
12,177,096
12,023,787
Federal funds purchased
351,676
56,581
33,539
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
355,047
242,160
235,533
Corporate and subordinated debentures
389,540
115,833
115,666
Other borrowings
700,097
700,103
700,105
Reserve for unfunded commitments
43,161
335
Derivative liabilities
979,155
30,485
43,287
Other liabilities
467,323
225,486
248,874
Total liabilities
33,255,953
13,548,079
13,401,126
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock - $2.50 par value; authorized 160,000,000, 80,000,000 and 80,000,000 shares; 70,928,304, 33,744,385 and 33,902,726 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
177,321
84,361
84,757
Surplus
3,764,482
1,607,740
1,617,004
Retained earnings
604,564
679,895
646,325
Accumulated other comprehensive income
17,046
1,017
2,870
Total shareholders’ equity
4,563,413
2,373,013
2,350,956
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Financial Statements.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Net Income (unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended
Nine Months Ended
Interest income:
Loans, including fees
280,825
134,953
581,566
402,175
Taxable
11,118
10,785
33,951
28,933
Tax-exempt
2,136
1,587
5,041
4,700
Federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell and interest-bearing deposits with banks
1,215
2,676
3,100
7,565
Total interest income
295,294
150,001
623,658
443,373
Interest expense:
Deposits
15,154
16,655
42,215
50,693
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
509
612
1,515
2,037
5,034
1,397
8,197
4,332
4,249
3,964
10,813
8,492
Total interest expense
24,946
22,628
62,740
65,554
Net interest income
270,348
127,373
560,918
377,819
Provision for credit losses
29,797
4,028
217,804
9,220
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
240,551
123,345
343,114
368,599
Noninterest income:
Fees on deposit accounts
24,346
19,725
59,166
56,274
Mortgage banking income
48,022
6,115
81,040
13,807
Trust and investment services income
7,404
7,320
21,931
22,309
Correspondent banking and capital market income
26,432
690
36,992
1,536
Securities gains, net
15
437
2,687
Recoveries on acquired loans
—
1,401
4,615
Other
8,571
1,894
14,125
6,030
Total noninterest income
114,790
37,582
213,269
107,258
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits
134,919
59,551
277,617
176,529
Occupancy expense
23,845
11,883
52,091
35,344
Information services expense
18,855
8,878
40,317
26,558
OREO expense and loan related
1,146
597
2,840
2,229
Pension plan termination expense
9,526
Amortization of intangibles
9,560
3,268
17,232
9,817
Supplies, printing and postage expense
2,755
1,418
5,870
4,417
Professional fees
4,385
2,442
9,727
7,463
FDIC assessment and other regulatory charges
2,849
228
7,310
3,218
Advertising and marketing
1,203
1,052
2,548
2,818
Merger and branch consolidation related expense
21,662
66,070
3,058
15,708
7,047
37,624
23,033
Total noninterest expense
236,887
96,364
519,246
304,010
Earnings:
Income before provision for income taxes
118,454
64,563
37,137
171,847
Provision for income taxes
23,233
12,998
2,741
34,455
Net income
95,221
51,565
34,396
137,392
Earnings per common share:
Basic
1.34
1.51
0.70
3.94
Diluted
1.50
0.69
3.92
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
70,905
34,057
49,330
34,859
71,076
34,300
49,636
35,069
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gains on available for sale securities:
Unrealized holding gains arising during period
1,915
7,467
48,573
44,528
Tax effect
(421)
(1,643)
(10,686)
(9,796)
Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income
(15)
(437)
2,679
(590)
Net of tax amount
1,482
5,483
37,875
36,821
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments qualifying as cash flow hedges:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during period
165
(4,988)
(34,150)
(18,931)
(37)
1,097
7,512
4,165
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) included in interest expense
3,457
(241)
6,143
(585)
(760)
53
(1,351)
128
2,825
(4,079)
(21,846)
(15,223)
Change in pension plan and retiree medical plan obligation:
Change in pension and retiree medical plan obligation during period
Reclassification adjustment for changes included in net income
7,888
(1,735)
6,153
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
4,307
1,404
16,029
27,751
Comprehensive income
99,528
52,969
50,425
165,143
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (unaudited)
Three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019
(Dollars in thousands, except for share data)
Accumulated
Common Stock
Retained
Comprehensive
Shares
Amount
Earnings
Income
Total
Balance, June 30, 2019
34,735,587
86,839
1,676,229
609,444
1,466
2,373,978
Comprehensive income:
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effects
Total comprehensive income
Cash dividends declared on common stock at $.43 per share
(14,684)
Employee stock purchases
5,598
14
360
374
Stock options exercised
24,256
61
767
828
Stock issued pursuant to restricted stock units
578
1
(1)
Common stock repurchased - buyback plan
(858,800)
(2,147)
(62,307)
(64,454)
Common stock repurchased
(4,493)
(11)
(329)
(340)
Share-based compensation expense
2,285
Balance, September 30, 2019
33,902,726
Balance, June 30, 2020
70,907,119
177,268
3,759,166
542,677
12,739
4,491,850
Cash dividends declared at $.47 per share
(33,334)
9,316
23
399
422
5,471
166
180
10,207
26
(26)
(3,809)
(10)
(183)
(193)
4,960
Balance, September 30, 2020
70,928,304
Nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019
Accumulated Other
Income (Loss)
Balance, December 31, 2018
35,829,549
89,574
1,750,495
551,108
(24,881)
2,366,296
Cash dividends declared on common stock at $1.21 per share
(42,175)
11,548
29
688
717
36,978
1,137
1,230
Restricted stock awards (forfeitures)
6,602
17
(17)
51,543
(128)
(2,000,000)
(5,000)
(139,594)
(144,594)
(33,494)
(84)
(2,219)
(2,303)
6,642
Balance, December 31, 2019
33,744,385
Cash dividends declared on common stock at $1.41 per share
(64,907)
16,217
40
807
23,012
58
682
740
8,828
22
(22)
306,282
766
(766)
(320,000)
(800)
(23,915)
(24,715)
(121,489)
(304)
(7,334)
(7,638)
18,694
Common stock issued for CenterState merger
37,271,069
93,178
2,153,149
2,246,327
Stock options and restricted stock acquired and converted pursuant to CenterState acquisition
15,487
Cumulative change in accounting principle due to the adoption of ASU 2016-13
(44,820)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
31,471
24,981
Deferred income taxes
(31,577)
1,457
Gains on sale of securities, net
(2,687)
Trading securities revenue
(189)
Purchases of trading securities
(108,537)
Proceeds from sale of trading securities
108,726
Accretion of discount related to acquired loans
(43,484)
(9,131)
(Gains) losses on disposal of premises and equipment
(514)
3,648
Gains on sale of bank premises and other repossessed real estate
(21)
(527)
Net amortization of premiums on investment securities
13,318
5,310
Bank premises and other repossessed real estate write downs
770
727
Fair value adjustment for loans held for sale
(5,125)
1,463
Originations and purchases of loans held for sale
(1,943,097)
(583,804)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale
2,079,830
525,659
Gains on sales of loans held for sale
(74,808)
(7,786)
Bank owned life insurance income
(6,830)
(4,206)
Net change in:
Accrued interest receivable
(21,717)
(134)
Prepaid assets
(8,939)
(846)
Operating Leases
6,037
1,134
(1,231)
(218)
Derivative assets
(40,330)
(19,225)
Miscellaneous other assets
42,018
(27,477)
Accrued interest payable
678
317
Accrued income taxes
(30,106)
2,625
60,536
38,866
Miscellaneous other liabilities
58,345
24,307
Net cash provided by operating activities
356,103
127,707
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale
23,540
231,990
Proceeds from maturities and calls of investment securities available for sale
705,381
208,640
Proceeds from sales of other investment securities
42,034
45
Purchases of investment securities available for sale
(1,201,855)
(692,114)
Purchases of other investment securities
(80,513)
(23,566)
Net increase in loans
(737,130)
(280,684)
Net cash received from acquisitions
2,566,376
Recoveries of loans previously charged off
8,287
2,833
Purchases of premises and equipment
(13,009)
(11,533)
Proceeds from redemption and payout of bank owned life insurance policies
19,207
1,323
Proceeds from sale of bank premises and other repossessed real estate
8,254
7,405
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
704
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
1,341,276
(555,644)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits
2,174,838
376,854
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings
6,436
(1,577)
Proceeds from borrowings
500,000
700,001
Repayment of borrowings
(500,005)
(150,005)
Common stock issuance
Common stock repurchases
(32,353)
(146,897)
Dividends paid on common stock
Net cash provided by financing activities
2,085,556
738,148
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
3,782,935
310,211
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
408,983
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
Supplemental Disclosures:
Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid for:
Interest
73,525
65,237
Income taxes
62,555
31,928
Initial measurement and recognition of operating lease assets in exchange for lease liabilities per ASU 2016-02
82,160
Recognition of operating lease assets in exchange for lease liabilities
7,054
10,239
Schedule of Noncash Investing Transactions:
Acquisitions:
Fair value of tangible assets acquired
18,937,418
Other intangible assets acquired
140,862
Liabilities assumed
17,380,016
Net identifiable assets acquired over liabilities assumed
563,625
Common stock issued in acquisition
Real estate acquired in full or in partial settlement of loans
4,262
9,610
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
Note 1 — Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, otherwise referred to herein as GAAP, for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of Management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Certain prior period information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation, and these reclassifications had no impact on net income or equity as previously reported. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2020.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The information contained in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on February 21, 2020, as amended on March 6, 2020, should be referenced when reading these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. Unless otherwise mentioned or unless the context requires otherwise, references herein to “South State,” the “Company” “we,” “us,” “our” or similar references mean South State Corporation and its consolidated subsidiary. References to the “Bank” means South State Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary, SouthState Bank, National Association, a national banking association.
Allowance for Credit Losses (“ACL”)
On January 1, 2020, we adopted the requirements of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, sometimes referred to herein as ASU 2016-13. Topic 326 was subsequently amended by ASU No. 2019-11, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses; ASU No. 2019-05, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses; and ASU No. 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments. This standard applies to all financial assets measured at amortized cost and off balance sheet credit exposures, including loans, investment securities and unfunded commitments. We applied the standard’s provisions using the modified retrospective method as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2020. With this transition method, we did not have to restate comparative prior periods presented in the financial statements related to Topic 326, but will present comparative prior periods disclosures using the previous accounting guidance for the allowance for loan losses. This adoption method is considered a change in accounting principle requiring additional disclosure of the nature of and reason for the change, which is solely a result of the adoption of the required standard.
ACL – Investment Securities
Management uses a systematic methodology to determine its ACL for investment securities held to maturity. The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the held-to-maturity portfolio. Management considers the effects of past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts on the collectability of the loan portfolio. The Company’s estimate of its ACL involves a high degree of judgment; therefore, Management’s process for determining expected credit losses may result in a range of expected credit losses. Management monitors the held-to-maturity portfolio to determine whether a valuation account would need to be recorded. The Company currently has no investment securities held to maturity.
Management excludes the accrued interest receivable balance from the amortized cost basis in measuring expected credit losses on the investment securities and does not record an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable. As of September 30, 2020, the accrued interest receivable for investment securities available for sale recorded in Other Assets was $11.4 million.
Management no longer evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment, otherwise referred to herein as OTTI, as ASC Subtopic 326-30, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses—Available-for-Sale Debt Securities, changes the accounting for recognizing impairment on available-for-sale debt securities. Each quarter Management evaluates impairment where there has been a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis of a security to determine whether there is a credit loss associated with the decline in fair value. Management considers the nature of the collateral, potential future changes in collateral values, default rates, delinquency rates, third-party guarantees, credit ratings, interest rate changes since purchase, volatility of the security’s fair value and historical loss information for financial assets secured with similar collateral among other factors. Credit losses are calculated individually, rather than collectively, using a discounted cash flow method, whereby Management compares the present value of expected cash flows with the amortized cost basis of the security. The credit loss component would be recognized through the provision for credit losses in the Statements of Income.
ACL - Loans
The ACL reflects Management’s estimate of losses that will result from the inability of our borrowers to make required loan payments. The Company established the incremental increase in the ACL at adoption through equity and subsequent adjustments through a provision for credit losses charged to earnings. The Company records loans charged off against the ACL and subsequent recoveries, if any, increase the ACL when they are recognized.
Management uses systematic methodologies to determine its ACL for loans held for investment and certain off-balance-sheet credit exposures. The ACL is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis to present the net amount expected to be collected on the loan portfolio. Management considers the effects of past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts on the collectability of the loan portfolio. The Company’s estimate of its ACL involves a high degree of judgment; therefore, Management’s process for determining expected credit losses may result in a range of expected credit losses. The Company’s ACL recorded in the balance sheet reflects Management’s best estimate within the range of expected credit losses. The Company recognizes in net income the amount needed to adjust the ACL for Management’s current estimate of expected credit losses. The Company’s ACL is calculated using collectively evaluated and individually evaluated loans.
The Company merged with CenterState Bank Corporation (“CSFL” or “CenterState”) on June 7, 2020. For the second quarter ended June 30, 2020, given the proximity of the merger date to the quarter end, Management evaluated loans from each legacy loan portfolio utilizing pre-existing methodologies implemented prior to the merger and aggregated the result. During the third quarter, Management consolidated the two methodologies into one to arrive at the ACL recorded at September 30, 2020.
The allowance for credit losses is measured on a collective pool basis when similar risk characteristics exist. Loans with similar risk characteristics are grouped into homogenous segments, or pools, for analysis. The Discounted Cash Flow (“DCF”) method is utilized for each loan in a pool, and the results are aggregated at the pool level. A periodic tendency to default and absolute loss given default are applied to a projective model of the loan’s cash flow while considering prepayment and principal curtailment effects. The analysis produces expected cash flows for each instrument in the pool by pairing loan-level term information (e.g., maturity date, payment amount, interest rate, etc.) with top-down pool assumptions (e.g., default rates and prepayment speeds). The Company has identified the following portfolio segments: Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate, Non Owner-Occupied Commercial Real Estate, Multifamily, Municipal, Commercial and Industrial, Commercial Construction and Land Development, Residential Construction, Residential Senior Mortgage, Residential Junior Mortgage, Revolving Mortgage, and Consumer and Other.
In determining the proper level of the ACL, Management has determined that the loss experience of the Bank provides the best basis for its assessment of expected credit losses. It therefore utilized its own historical credit loss experience by each loan segment over an economic cycle, while excluding loss experience from certain acquired institutions (i.e., failed banks). For most of the segment models for collectively evaluated loans, the Company incorporated two or more macroeconomic drivers using a statistical regression modeling methodology.
10
Management considers forward-looking information in estimating expected credit losses. The Company subscribes to a third-party service which provides a quarterly macroeconomic baseline outlook and alternative scenarios for the United States economy. The baseline, along with the evaluation of alternative scenarios, is used by Management to determine the best estimate within the range of expected credit losses. The baseline forecast incorporates a 50% probability of the United States economy performing better than this projection and the same as the probability that it will perform worse. Management has evaluated the appropriateness of the reasonable and supportable forecast scenarios and has made adjustments as needed. For the contractual term that extends beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast period, the Company reverts to the long term mean of historical factors within four quarters using a straight-line approach. The Company generally utilizes a four-quarter forecast and a four-quarter reversion period.
Included in its systematic methodology to determine its ACL, Management considers the need to qualitatively adjust expected credit losses for information not already captured in the loss estimation process. These qualitative adjustments either increase or decrease the quantitative model estimation (i.e., formulaic model results). Each period the Company considers qualitative factors that are relevant within the qualitative framework that includes the following: 1) Lending Policy; 2) Economic conditions not captured in models; 3) Volume and Mix of Loan Portfolio; 4) Past Due Trends; 5) Concentration Risk; 6) External Factors; and 7) Model Limitations.
When a loan no longer shares similar risk characteristics with its segment, the asset is assessed to determine whether it should be included in another pool or should be individually evaluated. During the third quarter of 2020 we consolidated the ACL models and due to the size of the combined company elected to increase the threshold for individually-evaluated loans to all non-accrual loans with a net book balance in excess of $1.0 million. We will monitor the credit environment and make adjustments to this threshold in the future if warranted. Based on the threshold above, consumer financial assets will generally remain in pools unless they meet the dollar threshold. The expected credit losses on individually-evaluated loans will be estimated based on discounted cash flow analysis unless the loan meets the criteria for use of the fair value of collateral, either by virtue of an expected foreclosure or through meeting the definition of collateral-dependent. Financial assets that have been individually evaluated can be returned to a pool for purposes of estimating the expected credit loss insofar as their credit profile improves and that the repayment terms were not considered to be unique to the asset.
Management measures expected credit losses over the contractual term of a loan. When determining the contractual term, the Company considers expected prepayments but is precluded from considering expected extensions, renewals, or modifications, unless the Company reasonably expects it will execute a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) with a borrower. In the event of a reasonably-expected TDR, the Company factors the reasonably-expected TDR into the current expected credit losses estimate. For consumer loans, the point at which a TDR is reasonably expected is when the Company approves the borrower’s application for a modification (i.e., the borrower qualifies for the TDR) or when the Credit Administration department approves loan concessions on substandard loans. For commercial loans, the point at which a TDR is reasonably expected is when the Company approves the loan for modification or when the Credit Administration department approves loan concessions on substandard loans. The Company uses a discounted cash flow methodology for a TDR to calculate the effect of the concession provided to the borrower within the ACL.
A restructuring that results in only a delay in payments that is insignificant is not considered an economic concession. In accordance with the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, also known as the CARES Act, the Company implemented loan modification programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in order to provide borrowers with flexibility with respect to repayment terms. The Company’s payment relief assistance includes forbearance, deferrals, extension and re-aging programs, along with certain other modification strategies. The Company elected the accounting policy in the CARES Act to not apply TDR accounting to loans modified for borrowers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic if the concession meets the criteria as defined under the CARES Act.
For purchased credit-deteriorated, otherwise referred to herein as PCD, assets are defined as acquired individual financial assets (or acquired groups of financial assets with similar risk characteristics) that, as of the date of acquisition, have experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination, as determined by the Company’s assessment. The Company records acquired PCD loans by adding the expected credit losses (i.e., allowance for credit losses) to the purchase price of the financial assets rather than recording through the provision for credit losses in the income statement. The expected credit loss, as of the acquisition day, of a PCD loan is added to the allowance for credit losses. The non-credit discount or premium is the difference between the unpaid principal balance and the amortized cost basis as of the acquisition date. Subsequent to the acquisition date, the change in the ACL on PCD loans is recognized through the provision for credit losses. The non-credit discount or premium is accreted or amortized,
11
respectively, into interest income over the remaining life of the PCD loan on a level-yield basis. In accordance with the transition requirements within the standard, the Company’s acquired credit-impaired loans (i.e., ACI or Purchased Credit Impaired) were treated as PCD loans.
The Company follows its nonaccrual policy by reversing contractual interest income in the income statement when the Company places a loan on nonaccrual status. Therefore, Management excludes the accrued interest receivable balance from the amortized cost basis in measuring expected credit losses on the portfolio and does not record an allowance for credit losses on accrued interest receivable. As of September 30, 2020, the accrued interest receivable for loans recorded in Other Assets was $97.8 million.
The Company has a variety of assets that have a component that qualifies as an off-balance sheet exposure. These primarily include undrawn portions of revolving lines of credit and standby letters of credit. The expected losses associated with these exposures within the unfunded portion of the expected credit loss will be recorded as a liability on the balance sheet with an offsetting income statement expense. Management has determined that a majority of the Company’s off-balance-sheet credit exposures are not unconditionally cancellable. As part of the new combined ACL methodology implemented during the current quarter, Management completed a funding study based on historical data to estimate the percentage of unfunded loan commitments that will ultimately be funded to calculate the reserve for unfunded commitments. Management applied this funding rate, along with the loss factor rate determined for each pooled loan segment, to unfunded loan commitments, excluding unconditionally cancellable exposures and letters of credit, to arrive at the reserve for unfunded loan commitments. Prior to the current quarter, the Company applied a utilization rate instead of a funding rate to the South State legacy portfolio to determine the reserve for unfunded commitments. As of September 30, 2020, the liability recorded for expected credit losses on unfunded commitments in Other Liabilities was $43.2 million. The current adjustment to the ACL for unfunded commitments is recognized through the provision for credit losses in the Statements of Income.
Note 3 — Recent Accounting and Regulatory Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Adopted in 2020
In February 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2020-02, Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 119 and Update to SEC Section of Effective Date Related to Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This update adds the content of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 119 to the FASB Codification. SAB No.119 provides interpretive guidance on methodologies and supporting documentation for measuring credit losses, with a focus on the documentation the staff would normally expect registrants engaged in lending transactions to prepare and maintain to support estimates of current expected credit losses for loan transactions. The ASU also updates the SEC section of the FASB Codification for the delay in the effective date of Topic 842 for public business entities that otherwise would not meet the definition of a public business entity except for a requirement to include its financial information in another entity’s filing with the SEC. The clarification related to SAB No. 119 was adopted in the first quarter of 2020 when ASU 2016-13 was adopted. See ASU 2016-13 below for overall effect of Topic 326 Financial Instruments-Credit Losses on our consolidated financial statements. The change in the effective date for ASU 2016-02 – Leases did not affect the Company in that we adopted the standard in 2019.
In November 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-11, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815. This update, related to ASU 2016-01, clarifies certain aspects brought to the Account Standards Board attention by stakeholders related to these ASUs, but does not change the core principles of these standards. The areas of improvement clarified in this update are related to 1) expected recoveries for purchased financial assets with credit deterioration, 2) transition relief for troubled debt restructurings, 3) disclosures related to accrued interest receivables, 4) financial assets secured by collateral maintenance provisions and 5) conforming amendment to Subtopic 805-20. This clarification was adopted in the first quarter of 2020 when the overall standard was adopted. See ASU 2016-13 below for overall effect of Topic 326 Financial Instruments-Credit Losses on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-05, Targeted Transition Relief (Topic 326 – Financial Instruments-Credit Losses). This update provides entities that have certain instruments within the scope of Subtopic 326-20, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses— Measured at Amortized Cost, with an option to irrevocably elect the
12
fair value option in Subtopic 825-10 applied on an instrument-by-instrument basis for eligible instruments, upon adoption of Topic 326. The fair value option election does not apply to held-to-maturity debt securities. An entity that elects the fair value option should subsequently apply the guidance in Subtopics 820-10, Fair Value Measurement—Overall, and 825-10. This update was adopted in the first quarter of 2020 when the overall standard was adopted. See ASU 2016-13 below for overall effect of Topic 326 Financial Instruments-Credit Losses on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments. This update related to ASU 2016-01, ASU 2017-12 and ASU 2016-13 clarifies certain aspects brought to the Account Standards Board attention by stakeholders related to these ASUs, but does not change the core principles of these standards. The clarifications related to ASU 2016-01 and 2017-12 were adopted in the second quarter of 2019 and did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. The clarifications related to ASU 2016-13 were adopted in the first quarter of 2020 when the overall standard was adopted. See ASU 2016-13 below for overall effect of Topic 326 Financial Instruments-Credit Losses on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820). ASU 2018-13 removes, modifies, and adds certain disclosure requirements in ASC 820 related to Fair Value Measurement on the basis of the concepts in the FASB Concepts Statement Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting — Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements. ASU 2018-13 was effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods therein. The ASU requires application of the prospective method of transition (for only the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption) to the new disclosure requirement additions. The ASU also requires prospective application to any modifications to disclosures made because of the change to the requirements for the narrative description of measurement uncertainty. The effects of all other amendments made by the ASU must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. This update did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangible-Goodwill and other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. ASU 2017-04 simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment for all entities by requiring impairment charges to be based on the first step in today’s two-step impairment test under ASC Topic 350 and eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. As amended, the goodwill impairment test consists of one step comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize a goodwill impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The guidance was effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those years. Based on effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy and on our stock price, we evaluated our goodwill based on ASU 2017-04 at March 31, 2020 and determined there was no impairment of goodwill or other intangibles. We also evaluated the carrying value of goodwill as of April 30, 2020, our annual test date, and again, determined that no impairment charge was necessary. The Company will continue to monitor if a triggering event occurs that requires goodwill to be evaluated again.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. ASU 2016-13 requires an entity to utilize a new impairment model known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model to estimate its lifetime “expected credit loss” and record an ACL that, when deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset, presents the net amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The CECL model is expected to result in earlier recognition of credit losses for loans, investment securities portfolio, and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Account Policies – Allowance for Credit Losses for further discussion. We adopted the new standard as of January 1, 2020. This standard did not have a material impact on our investment securities portfolio at implementation. Related to the implementation of ASU 2016-13, we recorded additional ACL for loans of $54.4 million, deferred tax assets of $12.6 million, an additional reserve for unfunded commitments of $6.4 million and an adjustment to retained earnings of $44.8 million. See table the below for impact of ASU 2016-13 on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. See Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further discussion.
13
January 1, 2020
As Reported Under
Pre-ASC 326
Impact of ASC 326
Dollars in thousands
ASC 326
Adoption
Assets:
Allowance for Credit Losses on Debt Securities
Investment Securities - Available for Sale
A
Investment Securities - Held to Maturity
Loans
Non - Acquired Loans
Acquired Loans
2,118,940
2,117,209
1,723
B
Allowance for Credit Losses on Loans
(111,365)
(54,438)
C
Deferred Tax Asset
43,955
12,639
D
Accrued Interest Receivable - Loans
30,009
28,332
1,677
Liabilities:
Reserve for Loan Losses - Unfunded Commitments
6,756
6,421
E
Equity:
Retained Earnings
635,075
F
A - The Company did not have any held-to maturity securities as of January 1, 2020. Per our analysis we determined that no ACL was necessary for investment securities – available for sale.
B – Accrued interest receivable from acquired credit impaired loans of $1,677 was reclassified to other assets and was offset by the reclass of the grossed up credit discount on acquired credit impaired loans of $3,408 that was moved to the ACL for the purchased credit deteriorated loans.
C – This is the calculated adjustment to the ACL related to the adoption of ASC 326. Additional reserve related to non-acquired loans was $34,049, to acquired loans was $16,981 and to purchased credit deteriorated loans was $3,408.
D – This is the effect of deferred tax assets related to the adjustment to the ACL from the adoption of ASC 326 using a 22% tax rate.
E – This is the adjustment to the reserve for unfunded commitments related to the adoption of ASC 326.
F – This is the net adjustment to retained earnings related to the adoption of ASC 326.
Issued But Not Yet Adopted Accounting Standards
In March 2020, FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848 – Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. This update provides companies with optional guidance to ease the potential accounting burden associated with transitioning away from reference rates that are expected to be discontinued. The amendments in this Update provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The amendments in this update apply only to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The amendments in this update were effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. An entity may elect to apply the amendments in this update to eligible hedging relationships existing as of the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020 and to new eligible hedging relationships entered into after the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020. An entity may elect to apply the amendments for contract modifications as of any date from the beginning of an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, or prospectively from a date within an interim period that includes or is subsequent to March 12, 2020, up to the date that the financial statements are available to be issued. Once elected, the amendments in this update must be applied prospectively for all eligible contract modifications and hedging relationships. The Company has established a LIBOR Committee and various subcommittees which are continuing to evaluate the impact of adopting ASU 2020-04 on the consolidated financial statements including evaluating all of its contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that will be effected by reference rates that are being discontinued.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740) – Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The amendments in this update simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. The amendments also improve consistent application of and simplify GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying the amending existing guidance. Some of the simplification items included are 1) simplification for intraperiod tax allocations where entities will determine the tax effect of pre-tax
income or loss from continuing operations without consideration of the tax effect of other items that are not included in continuing operations, 2) simplification for calculating income taxes in an interim period when a year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the year allowing an entity to record a benefit for year-to-date loss in excess of its forecasted loss, and 3) simplify the accounting for income taxes by requiring that an entity recognize a franchise tax (or similar tax) that is partially based on income as an income-based tax and account for any incremental amount incurred as a non-income-based tax. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments related to franchise taxes that are partially based on income should be applied on either a retrospective basis for all periods presented or a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied on a prospective basis. We do not believe this update will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-14, Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans (Subtopic 715-20. ASU 2018-14 amends ASC 715-20 to add, remove, and clarify disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. For public business entities, ASU 2018-14 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020 and requires entities to apply the amendment on a retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. At this point in time, we do not expect that this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 4— Mergers and Acquisitions
CenterState Bank Corporation (“CSFL”)
On June 7, 2020, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of CSFL, of Winter Haven, Florida, the bank holding company for CenterState Bank, N.A. (“CSB”), in a stock transaction. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, (i) CSFL merged with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”), and (ii) immediately following the Merger, SouthState Bank (“SSB”), a South Carolina banking corporation and wholly owned bank subsidiary of the Company, merged with and into CSB, a national banking association and wholly owned bank subsidiary of CSFL, with CSB continuing as the surviving bank (the “Bank Merger”). In connection with the Bank Merger, CSB changed its name to “SouthState Bank, National Association” (hereinafter referred to as the “Bank”). CSFL common shareholders received 0.3001 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for each share of CSFL stock resulting in the Company issuing 37,271,069 shares of its common stock. In total, the purchase price for CSFL was $2.26 billion including the value of the conversion of CSFL’s outstanding warrants, stock options and restricted stock units totaling $15.5 million.
In the acquisition, the Company acquired $13.0 billion of loans, including PPP loans, at fair value, net of $239.5 million, or 1.82%, estimated discount, including a fair value adjustment of $29.8 million recorded during the current quarter, to the outstanding principal balance, representing 113.9% of the Company’s total loans at December 31, 2019. Of the total loans acquired, Management identified $3.1 billion that had more than insignificantly deteriorated since origination and were thus determined to be PCD loans.
In its assumption of the deposit liabilities, the Company believed the deposits assumed from the acquisition have an intangible value. The Company applied ASC Topic 805, which prescribes the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets such as core deposit intangibles, in a business combination. The Company determined the estimated fair value of the core deposit intangible asset totaled $125.9 million, which will be amortized utilizing a sum-of-the-years’-digit method over an estimated economic life not to exceed ten years. In determining the valuation amount, deposits were analyzed based on factors such as type of deposit, deposit retention, interest rates and age of deposit relationships. During the current quarter, the Company identified an additional intangible related to its correspondent banking business acquired in the CSFL merger of approximately $10.0 million. As a result of the various measurement period adjustments identified during the current quarter, goodwill was reduced by $36.9 million to $563.6 million.
During the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2020 the Company incurred approximately $21.6 million and $65.9 million, respectively, of acquisition costs related to this transaction. There were no expenses incurred related to this acquisition for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2019. These acquisition costs are reported in merger and branch consolidation related expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.
The CSFL transaction was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration exchanged were recorded at estimated fair value on the acquisition date. Fair values are preliminary and subject to refinement for up to a year after the closing date of the acquisition.
Initial
Subsequent
As Recorded
Fair Value
As Recorded by
by CSFL
Adjustments
the Company
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
2,566,450
Investment securities
1,188,403
5,507
(a)
1,193,910
453,578
Loans, net of allowance and mark
12,969,091
(48,342)
(b)
29,834
12,950,583
Premises and equipment
324,396
2,392
(c)
5,999
332,787
Intangible assets
1,294,211
(1,163,349)
(d)
10,000
OREO and repossessed assets
10,849
(791)
(e)
(49)
10,009
333,053
Deferred tax asset
54,122
(8,681)
(f)
(8,952)
36,489
1,061,136
(604)
(g)
1,060,558
20,255,289
(1,213,868)
36,858
19,078,279
Liabilities
5,291,443
10,312,370
19,702
(h)
10,332,072
15,603,813
15,623,515
401,546
278,900
(7,401)
(i)
271,499
1,088,048
(4,592)
(j)
1,083,456
17,372,307
7,709
Net identifiable assets acquired over (under) liabilities assumed
2,882,982
(1,221,577)
1,698,263
600,483
(36,858)
Net assets acquired over liabilities assumed
(621,094)
2,261,888
Consideration:
South State Corporation common shares issued
Purchase price per share of the Company's common stock
60.27
Company common stock issued ($2,246,327) and cash exchanged for fractional shares ($74)
2,246,401
Stock option conversion
8,080
Restricted stock conversion
7,407
Fair value of total consideration transferred
Explanation of fair value adjustments
(a)— Represents the reversal of CSFL's existing fair value adjustments of $40.7 million and the adjustment to record securities at fair value (premium) totaling $46.2 million (includes reclassification of all securities held as HTM to AFS totaling $175.7 million).
(b)— Represents approximately 2.04%, or $269.1 million, total mark of the loan portfolio including a 1.97%, or $259.7 million credit mark, based on a third party valuation. Also, includes the reversal of CSFL's ending allowance for credit losses of $158.2 million and fair value adjustments of $62.6 million. Fair value was subsequently adjusted by $29.8 million due to a reduction in the loan mark (discount).
(c)— Represents the MTM adjustment of $4.0 million on leased assets partially offset by the write-off of deminimus fixed assets of $1.6 million. Subsequently, the fair value on certain bank premises was adjusted by $6.0 million based on updated appraisals received.
(d)— Represents approximately a 1.28% core deposit intangible, or $125.9 million from a third party valuation. This amount is net of $84.9 million existing core deposit intangible and $1.2 billion of existing goodwill from CSFL’s prior transactions that was reversed. Approximately $10.0 million in a customer list intangible related to the correspondent banking business was subsequently identified and recorded in the third quarter of 2020.
(e)— Represents the reversal of prior valuation reserves of $878,000 and recorded new valuation reserves of $1.7 million on both OREO and other repossessed assets. The fair value was subsequently adjusted based on gains and losses recognized from sales of OREO and other repossessed assets.
(f)— Represents deferred tax assets related to fair value adjustments measured using an estimated tax rate of 22.0%. This includes an adjustment from the CSFL tax rate to our tax rate. The difference in tax rates relates
16
to state income taxes. Additional deferred tax liability related to subsequent fair value adjustments identified and an updated estimated tax rate of 23.78% was approximately $9.0 million.
(g)— Represents a valuation reserve of bank property held for sale of $3.8 million and a fair value adjustment of a lease receivable of $116,000. These amounts are offset by positive fair value adjustment for investment in low income housing of $3.3 million.
(h)— Represents estimated premium for fixed maturity time deposits of $20.2 million partially offset by the reversal of existing CSFL fair value adjustments related to time deposit marks from other merger transactions of $546,000.
(i)— Represents the recording of a discount of $12.5 million on TRUPs from a third party valuation partially offset by the reversal of the existing CSFL discount on TRUPs and other debt of $5.1 million.
(j)— Represents the reversal of an existing $7.1 million unfunded commitment reserve at purchase date partially offset by a fair value adjustment to increase lease liabilities associated with leased facilities totaling $2.5 million.
Comparative and Pro Forma Financial Information for the CSFL Acquisition
Pro-forma data for the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2020 and 2019 listed in the table below presents pro-forma information as if the CSFL acquisition occurred at the beginning of 2019. These results combine the historical results of CSFL in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Net Income and, while certain adjustments were made for the estimated impact of certain fair value adjustments and other acquisition-related activity, they are not indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition taken place on January 1, 2019.
Merger-related costs of $65.9 million from the CSFL acquisition were incurred during 2020 and were excluded from pro forma information below. In addition, no adjustments have been made to the pro-formas to eliminate the provision for loan losses in 2019 of CSFL in the amount of $3.8 million. Pro-forma data for the year 2020 eliminated the non-PCD provision recorded on the acquisition date of $119.1 million. If the CSFL acquisition had occurred at the beginning of 2019, the acquisition date loan loss reserve amount would have been recorded directly through retained earnings upon adoption of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020. No adjustments have been made to reduce the impact of any OREO write downs, investment securities sold or repayment of borrowings recognized by CSFL in either 2020 or 2019. Expenses related to systems conversions and other costs of integration are expected to be recorded during 2020 and 2021 for the CSFL merger. The Company expects to achieve further operating cost savings and other business synergies as a result of the acquisitions which are not reflected in the pro forma amounts below. The total revenues presented below represent pro-forma net interest income plus pro-forma noninterest income:
Pro Forma
September 30, 2019
September 30, 2020
Total revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income)
361,287
1,151,361
1,009,372
275,217
788,031
786,383
Net adjusted income available to the common shareholder
113,008
300,248
301,898
EPS - basic
1.56
4.23
4.30
EPS - diluted
1.55
4.21
4.27
The disclosures regarding the results of operations for CSFL subsequent to the acquisition date are omitted as this information is not practical to obtain. Although the Company has not converted CSFL’s core system, the majority of the fixed costs and purchase accounting entries were booked on the Company’s core system making it impractical to determine CSFL’s results of operation on a stand-alone basis.
Note 5 — Investment Securities
The following is the amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale:
Gross
Amortized
Unrealized
Fair
Cost
Gains
Losses
Value
September 30, 2020:
Government-sponsored entities debt*
29,882
29,927
State and municipal obligations
446,068
13,236
(109)
459,195
Mortgage-backed securities**
3,008,562
54,671
(4,078)
3,059,155
Corporate securities
13,575
77
13,652
3,498,087
68,029
(4,187)
December 31, 2019:
25,356
585
25,941
204,150
5,029
(764)
208,415
1,711,257
14,209
(3,775)
1,721,691
1,940,763
19,823
(4,539)
September 30, 2019:
40,322
645
40,967
183,005
5,720
(43)
188,682
1,566,182
19,791
(2,488)
1,583,485
1,789,509
26,156
(2,531)
* - Our government-sponsored entities holdings are comprised of debt securities offered by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Ginnie Mae, the FHLB, and FFCB.
** - All of the mortgage-backed securities are issued by government-sponsored entities; there are no private-label holdings. Also, included in our mortgage-backed securities are debt securities offered by the SBA, which have the full faith and credit backing of the United States Government.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, the Company recognized gains of $469,000 and losses of $ 454,000 (a net gain of $15,000) from the sale of available for sale securities compared to a net realized gain of $437,000 and $2.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. The net realized gain of $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 includes net realized gains totaling $5.4 million from the sale of VISA Class B shares. If the gains from the VISA Class B share are excluded, the Company would have had a net realized loss of $2.7 million on the sale of available for sale securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2019.
18
The following is the amortized cost and carrying value of other investment securities:
Carrying
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
44,838
Federal Reserve Bank stock
129,871
Investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries
4,941
Other nonmarketable investment securities
5,549
43,044
3,563
2,517
Our other investment securities consist of non-marketable equity securities that have no readily determinable market value. Accordingly, when evaluating these securities for impairment, Management considers the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than recognizing temporary declines in value. As of September 30, 2020, we determined that there was no impairment on other investment securities.
The amortized cost and fair value of debt and equity securities at September 30, 2020 by contractual maturity are detailed below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.
Securities
Available for Sale
Due in one year or less
7,308
7,339
Due after one year through five years
57,855
59,731
Due after five years through ten years
531,275
547,293
Due after ten years
2,901,649
2,947,566
19
Information pertaining to our securities with gross unrealized losses at September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position is as follows:
Less Than
Twelve Months
or More
Securities Available for Sale
Government-sponsored entities debt
109
43,880
Mortgage-backed securities
2,988
697,242
1,090
110,312
3,097
741,122
764
42,070
2,422
461,658
1,353
141,982
3,186
503,728
43
5,275
1,113
312,686
1,375
154,111
1,156
317,961
Management evaluates securities for impairment where there has been a decline in fair value below the amortized cost basis of a security to determine whether there is a credit loss associated with the decline in fair value on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Credit losses are calculated individually, rather than collectively, using a discounted cash flow method, whereby Management compares the present value of expected cash flows with the amortized cost basis of the security. The credit loss component would be recognized through the provision for credit losses. Consideration is given to (1) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer including looking at default and delinquency rates, (2) the outlook for receiving the contractual cash flows of the investments, (3) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (4) our intent and ability to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value or for a debt security whether it is more-likely-than-not that we will be required to sell the debt security prior to recovering its fair value, (5) the anticipated outlook for changes in the general level of interest rates, (6) credit ratings, (7) third party guarantees, and (8) collateral values. In analyzing an issuer’s financial condition, Management considers whether the securities are issued by the federal government or its agencies, whether downgrades by bond rating agencies have occurred, the results of reviews of the issuer’s financial condition, and the issuer’s anticipated ability to pay the contractual cash flows of the investments. The Company performed an analysis that determined that the following securities have a zero expected credit loss: U.S. Treasury Securities, Agency-Backed Securities including securities issued by Ginnie Mae, Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, the FHLB, FFCB and SBA. All of the U.S. Treasury and Agency-Backed Securities have the full faith and credit backing of the United State Government or one of its agencies. Municipal securities and all other securities that do not have a zero expected credit loss are evaluated quarterly to determine whether there is a credit loss associated with a decline in fair value. All debt securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2020 continue to perform as scheduled and we do not believe that there is a credit loss or that a provision for credit losses is necessary. Also, as part of our evaluation of our intent and ability to hold investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in the market, we consider our investment strategy, cash flow needs, liquidity position, capital adequacy and interest rate risk position. We do not currently intend to sell the securities within the portfolio, and it is not more-likely-than-not that we will be required to sell the debt securities. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Account Policies for further discussion.
20
Management continues to monitor all of our securities with a high degree of scrutiny. There can be no assurance that we will not conclude in future periods that conditions existing at that time indicate some or all of its securities may be sold or would require a charge to earnings as a provision for credit losses in such periods.
Note 6 — Loans
The following is a summary of total loans:
Construction and land development
1,840,111
1,017,261
1,025,387
Commercial non-owner occupied
5,936,372
2,323,967
2,357,730
Commercial owner occupied real estate
4,846,020
2,158,701
2,093,795
Consumer owner occupied
4,311,186
2,706,960
2,760,126
Home equity loans
1,347,798
758,020
773,363
Commercial and industrial
5,419,120
1,386,327
1,261,527
Other income producing property
629,497
346,554
361,879
Consumer
900,171
663,422
654,883
Other loans
7,540
13,892
Total loans
25,237,815
11,375,104
11,290,147
(61,991)
(60,255)
In accordance with the adoption of ASU 2016-13, the above table reflects the loan portfolio at the amortized cost basis for the current period September 30, 2020, to include net deferred cost of $50.5 million and unamortized discount total related to loans acquired of $110.4 million. Accrued interest receivable (AIR) of $97.8 million is accounted for separately and reported in other assets. The allowance for credit losses in the comparative periods includes the day 2 valuation allowance on the acquired credit impaired loans, which was $5.1 million at December 31, 2019 and $5.3 million at September 30, 2019.
The comparative periods in the above table reflect the loan portfolio prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13. Prior periods were reported as shown in the below tables, with the acquired loans being net of unearned income and of related discounts, which includes the credit discount on the acquired credit impaired loans.
21
The following is a summary of non-acquired loans for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
Non-acquired loans:
Commercial non-owner occupied real estate:
968,360
955,318
1,811,138
1,777,327
Total commercial non-owner occupied real estate
2,779,498
2,732,645
Consumer real estate:
2,118,839
2,118,127
518,628
521,744
Total consumer real estate
2,637,467
2,639,871
1,784,017
1,677,695
1,280,859
1,130,847
218,617
220,957
538,481
525,040
Total non-acquired loans
Less allowance for loan losses
Non-acquired loans, net
9,195,904
8,873,575
The following is a summary of acquired non-credit impaired loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-20, net of related discount, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
Acquired non-credit impaired loans:
33,569
53,302
447,441
503,443
481,010
556,745
496,431
543,432
188,732
198,112
685,163
741,544
307,193
345,040
101,880
126,092
95,697
103,093
89,484
93,089
Acquired non-credit impaired loans
The unamortized discount related to the acquired non-credit impaired loans totaled $20.3 million and $24.2 million at December 31, 2019, and September 30, 2019, respectively.
In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310-30, we aggregated acquired loans that have common risk characteristics into pools of loan categories as described in the table below. The following is a summary of acquired credit impaired loans accounted for under FASB ASC Topic 310-30 (identified as credit impaired at the time of acquisition), net of related discount, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
Acquired credit impaired loans:
Commercial real estate
130,938
149,134
Commercial real estate—construction and development
25,032
26,930
Residential real estate
163,359
175,044
35,488
36,812
7,029
8,112
Acquired credit impaired loans
361,846
396,032
(5,064)
(5,318)
Acquired credit impaired loans, net
As part of the ongoing monitoring of the credit quality of our loan portfolio, Management tracks certain credit quality indicators, including trends related to (i) the level of classified loans, (ii) net charge-offs, (iii) non-performing loans (see details below), and (iv) the general economic conditions of the markets that we serve.
We utilize a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each commercial loan. Classified loans are assessed at a minimum every six months. A description of the general characteristics of the risk grades is as follows:
Construction and land development loans in the following table are on commercial and speculative real estate. Consumer owner occupied loans are on investment or rental 1-4 properties.
The following table presents the credit risk profile by risk grade of commercial loans by origination year:
Term Loans
Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
As of September 30, 2020
2018
2017
2016
Prior
Revolving
Risk rating:
Pass
$ 310,705
$ 417,268
$ 162,696
$ 87,830
$ 44,234
$ 62,987
$ 17,572
$ 1,103,292
Special mention
3,873
24,986
434
1,640
4,273
8,469
-
43,675
Substandard
355
2,815
856
1,921
654
3,847
10,448
Doubtful
Total Construction and land development
$ 314,933
$ 445,069
$ 163,986
$ 91,391
$ 49,161
$ 75,311
$ 1,157,423
$ 549,564
$ 1,105,865
$ 878,410
$ 705,532
$ 725,339
$ 1,303,140
$ 59,442
$ 5,327,292
41,358
76,702
106,855
46,660
35,293
131,472
438,340
1,317
49,669
8,127
27,310
38,636
45,677
170,736
Total Commercial non-owner occupied
$ 592,239
$ 1,232,236
$ 993,392
$ 779,502
$ 799,268
$ 1,480,293
$ 5,936,372
Commercial Owner Occupied
$ 623,490
$ 979,946
$ 752,860
$ 627,298
$ 489,093
$ 1,122,413
$ 35,709
$ 4,630,809
4,836
13,658
14,252
14,814
14,729
48,751
111,137
4,089
4,992
3,796
23,326
15,075
52,441
350
104,069
Total commercial owner occupied
$ 632,415
$ 998,596
$ 770,908
$ 665,438
$ 518,897
$ 1,223,610
$ 36,156
$ 4,846,020
$ 2,944,353
$ 630,152
$ 484,117
$ 339,940
$ 237,691
$ 456,125
$ 227,613
$ 5,319,991
9,431
6,959
3,768
7,772
2,791
26,921
11,600
69,242
526
867
7,513
7,573
3,388
7,159
2,850
29,876
Total commercial and industrial
$ 2,954,310
$ 637,979
$ 495,399
$ 355,288
$ 243,873
$ 490,207
$ 242,064
$ 5,419,120
$ 86,891
$ 93,360
$ 79,172
$ 64,528
$ 74,821
$ 138,341
$ 6,425
$ 543,538
2,649
1,249
1,875
238
885
12,637
100
19,633
633
909
849
1,213
996
13,808
47
18,455
Total other income producing property
$ 90,173
$ 95,518
$ 81,896
$ 65,979
$ 76,702
$ 164,792
$ 6,572
$ 581,632
$ 6,990
$ 4,951
$ 612
$ 357
$ 1,564
$ 1,604
$ 13,321
$ 29,399
3,613
251
65
140
304
4,402
121
389
143
89
341
1,089
Total Consumer owner occupied
$ 7,140
$ 8,953
$ 1,006
$ 511
$ 1,570
$ 2,085
$ 13,625
$ 34,890
$ 7,540
$ -
Total other loans
Total Commercial Loans
$ 4,529,533
$ 3,231,542
$ 2,357,867
$ 1,825,485
$ 1,572,742
$ 3,084,610
$ 360,082
$ 16,961,861
62,176
127,167
127,435
71,189
57,971
228,390
12,101
686,429
7,041
59,641
21,284
61,432
58,755
123,273
3,247
334,673
25
34
$ 4,598,750
$ 3,418,351
$ 2,506,587
$ 1,958,109
$ 1,689,471
$ 3,436,298
$ 375,431
$ 17,982,997
24
For the consumer segment, delinquency of a loan is determined by past due status. Consumer loans are automatically placed on nonaccrual status once the loan is 90 days past due. Construction and land development loans are on 1-4 properties and lots. The following table presents the credit risk profile by past due status of consumer loans by origination year:
Days past due:
Current
$ 683,682
$ 702,582
$ 635,065
$ 580,141
$ 444,876
$ 1,212,359
$ 4,258,705
30 days past due
63
237
116
68
2,736
3,220
60 days past due
246
330
1,824
134
516
1,445
4,495
90 days past due
337
364
1,279
905
6,991
9,876
$ 683,928
$ 703,312
$ 637,490
$ 581,670
$ 446,365
$ 1,223,531
$ 4,276,296
$ 6,134
$ 6,972
$ 8,988
$ 1,758
$ 442
$ 31,746
$ 1,282,226
$ 1,338,266
155
289
314
2,752
3,517
49
600
655
157
315
3,165
1,655
5,360
Total Home equity loans
$ 6,289
$ 7,046
$ 2,204
$ 764
$ 35,274
$ 1,287,233
$ 1,347,798
$ 229,845
$ 229,491
$ 132,566
$ 74,318
$ 46,477
$ 161,134
$ 21,285
$ 895,116
326
243
117
124
934
1,863
36
44
105
646
939
82
340
161
156
2,253
Total consumer
$ 230,028
$ 229,943
$ 133,217
$ 74,701
$ 46,779
$ 164,180
$ 21,323
$ 900,171
$ 262,567
$ 269,667
$ 86,778
$ 24,277
$ 7,238
$ 31,980
$ 682,507
27
107
$ 262,580
$ 32,148
$ 682,688
$ 3,226
$ 1,791
$ 2,441
$ 4,091
$ 3,065
$ 33,236
$ 47,850
$ 33,251
$ 47,865
Total Consumer Loans
$ 1,185,454
$ 1,210,503
$ 865,838
$ 684,585
$ 502,098
$ 1,470,455
$ 1,303,511
$ 7,222,444
268
480
522
199
3,998
2,771
8,627
282
380
1,892
239
538
2,187
618
6,136
487
1,597
1,376
11,744
1,656
17,611
$ 1,186,051
$ 1,211,759
$ 868,914
$ 686,943
$ 504,211
$ 1,488,384
$ 1,308,556
$ 7,254,818
Total Loans
$ 5,784,801
$ 4,630,110
$ 3,375,501
$ 2,645,052
$ 2,193,682
$ 4,924,682
$ 1,683,987
$ 25,237,815
The following table presents the credit risk profile by risk grade of commercial loans for non-acquired loans, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, under the incurred loss model:
Construction & Development
Commercial Non-owner Occupied
959,206
947,230
1,787,306
1,768,013
1,754,801
1,648,456
7,095
5,601
22,410
7,091
19,742
17,319
2,059
2,487
1,422
2,223
9,474
11,920
Commercial & Industrial
Other Income Producing Property
Commercial Total
1,256,465
1,103,532
213,291
215,624
5,971,069
5,682,855
16,055
18,148
3,966
3,922
69,268
52,081
8,339
9,167
1,360
1,411
22,654
27,208
6,062,991
5,762,144
The following table presents the credit risk profile by risk grade of consumer loans for non-acquired loans, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, under the incurred loss model:
Consumer Owner Occupied
Home Equity
2,094,080
2,091,129
508,054
510,508
536,002
522,674
9,585
9,054
4,490
5,373
421
15,174
17,944
6,084
5,863
1,992
1,945
Consumer Total
December 31, 2019
3,152,028
3,125,768
14,562
14,848
23,250
25,752
3,189,840
3,166,368
The following table presents the credit risk profile by risk grade of total non-acquired loans for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, under the incurred loss model:
Total Non-acquired Loans
9,123,097
8,808,623
83,830
66,929
45,904
52,960
The following table presents the credit risk profile by risk grade of commercial loans for acquired non-credit impaired loans for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, under the incurred loss model:
Commercial Non-owner
Occupied
31,690
51,340
432,710
492,258
300,678
330,005
966
736
14,162
5,035
3,092
3,427
913
1,226
569
6,150
3,423
11,608
Other Income Producing
Property
97,092
120,926
87,892
95,611
950,062
1,090,140
2,948
4,051
5,837
5,937
27,005
19,186
1,840
1,115
1,968
1,545
8,713
21,644
985,780
1,130,970
The following table presents the credit risk profile by risk grade of consumer loans for acquired non-credit impaired loans for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, under the incurred loss model:
486,433
532,760
174,912
184,946
86,535
90,076
6,434
6,805
5,679
5,405
574
3,564
3,867
8,141
7,761
2,295
2,439
747,880
807,782
12,767
12,784
14,000
14,067
774,647
834,633
The following table presents the credit risk profile by risk grade of total acquired non-credit impaired loans for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, under the incurred loss model:
Total Acquired
Non-credit Impaired Loans
1,697,942
1,897,922
39,772
31,970
22,713
35,711
The following table presents the credit risk profile by risk grade of acquired credit impaired loans (identified as credit-impaired at the time of acquisition), net of the related discount for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, under the incurred loss model:
Commercial Real Estate—
Construction and
Commercial Real Estate
Development
108,762
121,264
17,756
18,978
6,465
9,064
2,904
3,018
15,711
18,806
4,372
4,934
Residential Real Estate
82,203
88,131
4,483
4,696
5,160
5,703
35,968
36,901
12,658
12,723
286
471
45,188
50,012
18,347
19,393
1,583
1,938
Credit Impaired Loans
218,364
238,772
58,281
62,177
85,201
95,083
The risk grading of acquired credit impaired loans is determined utilizing a loan’s contractual balance, while the amount recorded in the financial statements and reflected above is the carrying value.
The following table presents an aging analysis of past due accruing loans, segregated by class:
30 - 59 Days
60 - 89 Days
90+ Days
Past Due
Non-Accruing
2,028
245
2,273
1,836,193
1,645
604
625
5,928,700
Commercial owner occupied
1,150
859
2,535
4,812,672
30,813
2,184
4,494
6,679
4,271,410
33,097
1,997
476
379
2,852
1,333,516
11,430
10,728
1,507
632
12,867
5,393,529
12,724
1,261
620,112
8,124
1,653
969
2,626
891,531
6,014
21,605
1,542
31,718
25,095,203
110,894
28
The following table presents an aging analysis of past due accruing loans, segregated by class for non-acquired loans, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
Commercial real estate:
321
967,511
494
114
1,810,264
760
553
3,771
1,776,764
3,482
752
2,110,719
7,368
1,343
39
1,382
515,673
1,573
2,097
110
2,307
1,272,360
6,192
208
404
217,159
846
201
891
536,003
13,864
8,768
930
514
10,212
9,220,317
22,302
194
211
954,558
549
173
299
472
1,776,366
489
1,588
4,406
1,669,227
4,062
1,390
79
1,469
2,109,103
7,555
425
662
519,701
1,381
1,209
327
30
1,566
1,126,682
2,599
115
181
296
219,981
680
558
672
522,829
1,539
6,882
2,543
329
9,754
8,899,904
18,854
The following table presents an aging analysis of past due accruing loans, segregated by class for acquired non-credit impaired loans, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
92
112
32,758
699
144
76
1,366
445,682
393
890
702
1,592
304,698
903
637
59
720
493,361
2,350
232
55
287
185,378
3,067
204
297
100,861
722
378
4,309
48
4,735
89,861
1,101
191
555
87,325
1,604
2,758
6,631
275
9,664
1,739,924
10,839
323
51,948
1,031
697
502,480
266
2,400
168
2,568
341,539
933
540,886
1,739
438
545
194,533
3,034
857
32
889
124,511
692
1,008
292
1,300
101,523
270
446
33
479
90,979
1,631
6,976
7,608
1,948,399
9,596
The following table presents an aging analysis of past due accruing loans, segregated by class for acquired credit impaired loans, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
2,283
2,659
4,942
125,996
24,639
2,838
976
5,571
9,385
153,974
820
283
534
1,637
33,851
118
910
75
1,103
5,926
6,059
2,169
9,232
17,460
344,386
444
252
2,671
3,367
145,767
88
261
349
26,581
2,317
1,143
5,016
8,476
166,568
948
185
499
1,632
35,180
359
7,753
4,079
1,580
8,524
14,183
381,849
The following is a summary of information pertaining to nonaccrual loans by class, including restructured loans:
Greater than
Non-accrual
90 Days Accruing(1)
with no allowance(1)
1,193
537
1,154
2,683
12,165
9,718
467
4,640
1,281
6,913
1,131
1,947
1,180
3,191
Total loans on nonaccrual status
33,141
19,444
There is no interest income recognized during the period on nonaccrual loans. The Company follows its nonaccrual policy by reversing contractual interest income in the income statement when the Company places a loan on nonaccrual status. Loans on nonaccrual status in which there is no allowance assigned are individually evaluated loans that do not carry a specific reserve. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for further detailed on individually evaluated loans. The increase in the nonaccrual balance in the above schedule, compared to December 31, 2019, is mainly due to the addition of nonaccrual loans of $69.3 million through the merger with CSFL in the second quarter. The increase was also partially due to the addition of $21.0 million of PCD loans, formerly accounted for as credit impaired loans, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13. These loans were previously excluded from nonaccrual loans. The adoption of ASU 2016-13 resulted in the discontinuation of the pool-level accounting for acquired credit impaired loans and replaced it with loan-level evaluation for nonaccrual status.
The following is a summary of information pertaining to non-acquired nonaccrual loans by class, including restructured loans, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
363
412
732
457
1,095
869
7,202
7,374
1,468
1,273
8,670
8,647
4,092
2,565
798
628
Restructured loans
2,578
544
31
The following is a summary of information pertaining to acquired non-credit impaired nonaccrual loans by class, including restructured loans, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
1,092
1,297
5,417
4,773
The following is a summary of collateral dependent loans, by type of collateral, and the extent to which they are collateralized during the period:
Collateral
Coverage
%
Church
345%
Office
1,045
1,800
172%
3,654
136%
398
648
163%
Retail
1,269
424%
1,943
1,984
102%
Industrial
738
149%
1,076
1,485
138%
2,389
3,510
147%
4,327
5,490
127%
3,303
7,285
221%
1,050
1,075
5,413
9,286
1,768
152%
1,178
1,578
134%
291
241%
3,696
8,442
228%
3,212
10,186
317%
4,622
392%
525
145%
Total collateral dependent loans
21,847
46,256
14,750
21,913
The Bank designates individually evaluated loans (excluding TDRs) on non-accrual with a net book balance exceeding the designated threshold as collateral dependent loans. Collateral dependent loans are loans for which the repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral and the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. These loans do not share common risk characteristics and are not included within the collectively evaluated loans for determining ACL. Under ASC 326-20-35-6, the Bank has adopted the collateral maintenance practical expedient to measure the ACL based on the fair value of collateral. The ACL is calculated on an individual loan basis based on the shortfall between the fair value of the loan's collateral, which is adjusted for selling costs, and amortized cost. If the fair value of the collateral exceeds the amortized cost, no allowance is required. The significant changes above in collateral percentage are due to appraisal value updates or changes in the number of loans within the asset class and collateral type. Overall collateral dependent loans decreased by $7.1 million from December 31, 2019 compared to the balance at September 30, 2020.
In the course of resolving delinquent loans, the Bank may choose to restructure the contractual terms of certain loans. Any loans that are modified are reviewed by the Bank to determine if a TDR, sometimes referred to herein as a restructured loan, has occurred. The Bank designates loan modifications as TDRs when it grants a concession to a borrower that it would not otherwise consider due to the borrower experiencing financial difficulty (FASB ASC
Topic 310-40). The concessions granted on TDRs generally include terms to reduce the interest rate, extend the term of the debt obligation, or modify the payment structure on the debt obligation. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for how such modifications are factored into the determination of the ACL.
Loans on nonaccrual status at the date of modification are initially classified as nonaccrual TDRs. Loans on accruing status at the date of concession are initially classified as accruing TDRs if the note is reasonably assured of repayment and performance is expected in accordance with its modified terms. Such loans may be designated as nonaccrual loans subsequent to the concession date if reasonable doubt exists as to the collection of interest or principal under the restructuring agreement. Nonaccrual TDRs are returned to accruing status when there is economic substance to the restructuring, there is documented credit evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition, the remaining balance is reasonably assured of repayment in accordance with its modified terms, and the borrower has demonstrated sustained repayment performance in accordance with the modified terms for a reasonable period of time (generally a minimum of six months). In prior periods, our TDR levels were deemed to be immaterial, therefore no comparative data is shown.
The Company elected the accounting policy in the CARES Act to not apply TDR accounting to loans modified for borrowers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic if the concession meets the criteria stipulated in the CARES Act. Details in regards to the Company’s implemented loan modification programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic under the CARES Act is disclosed under the Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
The following table presents loans designated as TDRs segregated by class and type of concession that were restructured during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2020
Pre-Modification
Post-Modification
Number
of loans
Interest rate modification
--
$--
4,637
336
Total interest rate modifications
$5,034
Term modification
72
295
120
Total term modifications
$672
$ 5,706
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020
$99
5,842
$6,890
591
51
563
$1,510
$ 8,400
At September 30, 2020, the balance of accruing TDRs was $16.2 million. The Company had $1.6 million remaining availability under commitments to lend additional funds on restructured loans at September 30, 2020. The amount of specific reserve associated with restructured loans was $1.2 at September 30, 2020.
The following table presents the changes in status of loans restructured within the previous 12 months as of September 30, 2020 by type of concession. The subsequent default in this case had no impact on the expected credit losses.
Paying Under
Restructured Terms
Converted to Nonaccrual
Foreclosures and Defaults
of Loans
$ 6,923
$ 8,405
$268
Note 7 — Allowance for Credit Losses (ACL)
See Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further detailed descriptions of our estimation process and methodology related to the allowance for credit losses.
The following table presents a disaggregated analysis of activity in the allowance for credit losses as follows:
Residential
CRE Owner
Non Owner
Mortgage Sr.
Mortgage Jr.
HELOC
Construction
C&D
Multifamily
Municipal
Occupied CRE
C & I
Allowance for credit losses:
Balance at beginning of period June 30, 2020
67,342
1,081
26,623
9,439
33,912
20,170
7,792
4,075
90,206
129,958
44,010
434,608
FMV Adjustment to Initial PCD Allowance
(1,255)
(319)
(1,542)
Adjusted CECL balance
67,371
88,951
129,961
43,691
433,066
Charge-offs
(90)
(297)
(38)
(1,393)
(458)
(578)
(1,788)
(4,642)
Recoveries
365
221
602
234
1,693
4,048
Net charge offs
183
(344)
(95)
(594)
Provision (benefit) (1)
(5,351)
253
(5,584)
(4,151)
29,756
4,577
(2,641)
4,830
(9,181)
(5,588)
7,687
Balance at end of period September 30, 2020
62,219
1,434
21,107
5,367
63,851
23,956
8,567
93,780
120,436
38,008
440,159
Quantitative allowance
Collectively evaluated
60,377
1,477
18,868
5,132
66,087
19,276
603
95,399
121,403
29,745
426,934
Individually evaluated
73
961
1,171
Total quantitative allowance
60,492
18,941
66,095
19,278
96,360
121,408
29,752
428,105
Qualitative allowance
1,727
2,166
235
(2,244)
4,678
831
(2,580)
(972)
8,256
12,054
Balance at beginning of period January 1, 2020
6,128
815
6,211
4,350
1,557
956
10,879
15,219
6,470
56,927
Impact of Adoption
5,455
3,849
779
5,588
3,490
1,391
914
9,505
13,898
51,030
Initial PCD Allowance
406
351
669
898
656
3,408
Adjusted CECL balance, January 1, 2020
11,989
8,465
1,594
12,150
8,509
3,045
1,870
21,282
29,773
12,659
111,365
Impact of merger on provision for non-PCD loans
16,712
226
4,227
4,893
7,673
3,836
1,212
919
25,393
35,067
9,284
109,442
29,935
804
5,119
1,302
6,035
6,120
902
1,003
34,077
45,787
18,320
149,404
(473)
(24)
(978)
(31)
(212)
(4,301)
(1,081)
(601)
(2,595)
(10,296)
876
988
83
1,070
1,498
2,291
403
222
52
858
(2,803)
(196)
(314)
(2,009)
3,180
153
3,286
(2,474)
37,135
8,294
3,345
(2,358)
13,224
10,123
(1,951)
71,957
An aggregated analysis of the changes in allowance for loan losses, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 is as follows:
Acquired Non-Credit
Acquired Credit
Impaired Loans
Three Months Ended September 30, 2019:
Balance at beginning of period
53,590
4,623
58,213
Loans charged-off
(1,969)
(810)
(2,779)
Recoveries of loans previously charged off (1)
834
50
884
Net charge-offs
(1,135)
(1,895)
Provision for loan losses charged to operations
2,482
786
Reduction due to loan removals
(91)
Balance at end of period
54,937
5,318
60,255
35
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019:
51,194
4,604
55,798
(4,541)
(2,719)
(7,260)
2,461
372
(2,080)
(2,347)
(4,427)
Provision for losses charged to operations
5,823
2,347
(336)
The following tables present a disaggregated analysis of activity in the allowance for loan losses and loan balances for non-acquired loans, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
Commercial
Other Income
& Land
Non-owner
Owner
Home
Producing
Equity
& Industrial
Three Months Ended September 30, 2019
Allowance for loan losses:
5,718
10,311
12,432
3,177
7,495
1,359
3,572
(69)
(100)
(32)
(1,727)
149
86
265
Provision (benefit)
159
456
(29)
1,633
6,016
10,551
9,969
12,547
7,561
3,743
Loans individually evaluated for impairment
587
387
1,221
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment
5,429
9,936
12,514
3,070
7,174
1,301
3,741
53,716
32,673
87
7,135
5,127
2,345
5,313
2,096
91
54,867
922,645
1,777,240
1,670,560
2,113,000
519,399
1,125,534
218,861
524,949
8,873,645
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
5,682
8,754
9,369
11,913
3,434
7,454
1,446
3,101
41
(78)
(3)
(115)
(141)
(4,035)
833
84
220
723
1,753
559
548
(348)
(143)
3,954
(41)
The following tables present a disaggregated analysis of activity in the allowance for loan losses and loan balances for acquired non-credit impaired loans, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
(39)
(23)
(648)
38
638
Total acquired non-credit impaired loans
(45)
(786)
(6)
(263)
(1,288)
(305)
71
42
(20)
1,107
269
The following tables present a disaggregated analysis of activity in the allowance for loan losses and loan balances for acquired credit impaired loans, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
Real Estate-
Real Estate
and Industrial
1,009
2,346
470
Provision (benefit) for loan losses
386
447
(9)
1,395
2,702
461
Loans:*
Total acquired credit impaired loans
801
2,246
761
599
742
(300)
(34)
(5)
(286)
*— The carrying value of acquired credit impaired loans includes a non-accretable difference which is primarily associated with the assessment of credit quality of acquired loans.
37
Note 8—Other Real Estate Owned
The following is a summary of information pertaining to OREO:
Nine Months Ended September 30,
OREO
Beginning balance
11,964
11,410
Acquired in the CSFL acquisition
9,931
Additions
Writedowns
(512)
(727)
Sold
(7,424)
(6,878)
Reclass of bank property held for sale
(4,741)
(4,991)
Ending Balance
At September 30, 2020, there were a total of 55 properties included in OREO compared to 72 properties at September 30, 2019. During the second quarter of 2020, a reclassification was made for bank property held for sale, which reduced the balance by $4.7 million, representing 11 properties. The reclassification reduced September 30, 2019 balance by $5.0 million, representing 10 properties. Bank property held for sale is now separately disclosed on the balance sheet. At September 30, 2020, we had $2.0 million in residential real estate included in OREO and $4.1 million in residential real estate consumer mortgage loans in the process of foreclosure.
Note 9 — Leases
As of September 30, 2020, we had operating right-of-use (“ROU”) assets of $121.6 million and operating lease liabilities of $126.1 million. We maintain operating leases on land and buildings for our operating centers, branch facilities and ATM locations. Most leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms extending up to 24 years. The exercise of renewal options is based on the sole judgment of Management and what they consider to be reasonably certain given the environment today. Factors in determining whether an option is reasonably certain of exercise include, but are not limited to, the value of leasehold improvements, the value of renewal rate compared to market rates, and the presence of factors that would cause a significant economic penalty to us if the option is not exercised. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet and instead are recognized in lease expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company also holds a small number of finance leases assumed in connection to the CSFL merger. These leases are all real estate leases. Terms and conditions are similar to those real estate operating leases described above. Lease classifications from the acquired institutions were retained.
Lease Cost Components:
Amortization of ROU assets - finance leases
125
172
Interest on lease liabilities - finance leases
Operating lease cost (cost resulting from lease payments)
4,557
2,241
9,873
6,560
Short-term lease cost
450
396
Variable lease cost (cost excluded from lease payments)
370
151
739
Total lease cost
5,324
2,512
11,258
7,293
Supplemental Cash Flow and Other Information Related to Leases:
Finance lease - operating cash flows
Finance lease - financing cash flows
150
Operating lease - operating cash flows (fixed payments)
1,996
8,763
5,804
Operating lease - operating cash flows (net change asset/liability)
(3,290)
248
(5,968)
504
New ROU assets - operating leases
1,475
5,289
41,211
New ROU assets - finance leases
5,374
Weighted - average remaining lease term (years) - finance leases
7.66
Weighted - average remaining lease term (years) - operating leases
11.6
14.30
Weighted - average discount rate - finance leases
1.7%
Weighted - average discount rate - operating leases
3.3%
3.9%
Operating lease payments due:
2020 (excluding the nine months ended September 30, 2020)
4,257
2021
16,381
2022
15,054
2023
14,041
2024
12,789
Thereafter
92,814
Total undiscounted cash flows
155,336
Discount on cash flows
(29,278)
Total operating lease liabilities
126,058
As of September 30, 2020, we determined that the number and dollar amount of our equipment leases was immaterial. As of September 30, 2020, we did not have additional operating leases that have not yet commenced from an amendment to a current lease.
Note 10 — Deposits
Our total deposits are comprised of the following:
Certificates of deposit
3,841,404
1,651,399
1,709,175
Interest-bearing demand deposits
13,819,204
5,966,496
5,682,129
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
Savings deposits
2,618,877
1,309,896
1,317,705
Other time deposits
9,374
3,999
7,246
At September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019, and September 30, 2019, we had $832.4 million, $303.2 million, and $316.4 million in certificates of deposits of $250,000 and greater, respectively. At September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, the Company held $600.0 million, $0 and $1.3 million in traditional, out-of-market brokered deposits, respectively. The increase in certificates of deposits of $250,000 and greater and
traditional, out-of-market brokered deposits from December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019 was the result of deposits acquired through the merger with CSB during the second quarter of 2020.
Note 11 — Retirement Plans
The Company and the Bank provide certain retirement benefits to their employees in the form of an employees’ savings plan. The Company and the Bank previously provided benefits through a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan that covered all employees hired on or before December 31, 2005, who had attained age 21, and who had completed a year of eligible service, but this plan was terminated in the second quarter of 2019. Employees hired on or after January 1, 2006 were not eligible to participate in the non-contributory defined benefit pension plan, but are eligible to participate in the employees’ savings plan. On this date, a new benefit formula applies only to participants who have not attained age 45 or who do not have five years of service.
During 2018, we made the decision to terminate the non-contributory defined benefit pension plan. We received approval from the IRS through a determination letter in the fourth quarter of 2018 to proceed with the termination. The termination of the pension plan was recorded during the second quarter of 2019 and distributions of assets from the plan were fully paid out by the fourth quarter of 2019. During the second quarter of 2019, the Company recorded a charge of $9.5 million related to the termination of the pension plan in the Consolidated Statement of Net Income. This cost was the result of the recognition of the pre-tax losses from the pension plan that were recorded and held in accumulated other comprehensive income of $7.7 million and the write-off of the pension plan asset of $1.8 million. Participants had the option to be fully paid out in a lump sum or be paid through an annuity over time. If the participant chose the annuity, the funds were placed in an annuity product with a third party.
The Company sponsors an employees’ savings plan under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k). Electing employees are eligible to participate in the employees’ savings plan after attaining age 21. Plan participants elect to contribute portions of their annual base compensation as a before tax contribution. Employer contributions may be made from current or accumulated net profits. Participants may elect to contribute 1% to 50% of annual base compensation as a before tax contribution. Employees participating in the plan received a 100% match of their 401(k) plan contribution from the Company, up to 4% of their salary. The employees were also eligible for an additional 2% discretionary matching contribution contingent upon certain of our annual financial goals which would be paid in the first quarter of the following year. Based on our financial performance in 2019, we paid a 0.375% discretionary matching contribution in the first quarter of 2020. Currently, we expect the same terms in the employees’ savings plan for 2020. As a result of the recent CSFL merger, all former CSFL employees became eligible to participate in the Company’s 401(k) plan as of legal close. CSFL’s existing 401(k) plan balances will merge into the Company’s 401(k) plan at the end of the year. We expensed $3.5 million and $7.8 million, respectively, for the 401(k) plan for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and $1.7 million and $4.7 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019.
Employees can enter the savings plan on or after the first day of each month. The employee may enter into a salary deferral agreement at any time to select an alternative deferral amount or to elect not to defer in the plan. If the employee does not elect an investment allocation, the plan administrator will select a retirement-based portfolio according to the employee’s number of years until normal retirement age. The plan’s investment valuations are generally provided on a daily basis.
Note 12 — Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per shares are calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during each period, excluding non-vested restricted shares. Our diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding during each period plus the maximum dilutive effect of common stock issuable upon exercise of stock options or vesting of restricted shares. Stock options and unvested restricted stock units are considered to common stock equivalents and are only included in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share when their effect is dilutive. The weighted-average number of shares and equivalents are determined after giving retroactive effect to stock dividends and stock splits.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share:
(Dollars and shares in thousands, except for per share amounts)
Basic earnings per common share:
Weighted-average basic common shares
Basic earnings per common share
Diluted earnings per common share:
Effect of dilutive securities
171
306
210
Weighted-average dilutive shares
Diluted earnings per common share
The calculation of diluted earnings per common share excludes outstanding stock options for which the results would have been anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30,
Number of shares
141,116
62,235
136,844
63,313
Range of exercise prices
52.28
to
91.35
87.30
61.42
69.48
Note 13 — Share-Based Compensation
Our 2004, 2012 and 2019 share-based compensation plans are long-term retention plans intended to attract, retain, and provide incentives for key employees and non-employee directors in the form of incentive and non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). Our 2019 plan was adopted by our shareholders at our annual meeting on April 25, 2019. The Company assumed the obligations of CSFL under various equity incentive plans pursuant to the closing on June 7, 2020 by South State of the merger of CSFL with and into South State.
Stock Options
With the exception of non-qualified stock options granted to directors under the 2004 and 2012 plans, which in some cases may be exercised at any time prior to expiration and in some other cases may be exercised at intervals less than a year following the grant date, incentive stock options granted under our 2004, 2012 and 2019 plans may not be exercised in whole or in part within a year following the date of the grant, as these incentive stock options become exercisable in 25% increments pro ratably over the four-year period following the grant date. The options are granted at an exercise price at least equal to the fair value of the common stock at the date of grant and expire ten years from the date of grant. No options were granted under the 2004 plan after January 26, 2012, and the 2004 plan is closed other than for any options still unexercised and outstanding. No options were granted under the 2012 plan after February 1, 2019, and the 2012 plan is closed other than for any options still unexercised and outstanding. The 2019 plan is the only plan from which new share-based compensation grants may be issued. It is our policy to grant options out of the 1,000,000 shares registered under the 2019 plan.
Activity in our stock option plans for 2004, 2012 and 2019 as well as stock options and warrants assumed from the CSFL merger is summarized in the following table. All information has been retroactively adjusted for stock dividends and stock splits.
Weighted
Average
Aggregate
Remaining
Intrinsic
Price
(Yrs.)
(000's)
Outstanding at January 1, 2020
176,888
67.14
Assumed stock options and warrants from CSFL merger
136,831
37.85
Exercised
(23,012)
32.14
Outstanding at September 30, 2020
290,707
56.13
4.57
1,529
Exercisable at September 30, 2020
Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the year
$0.00
The fair value of options is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and expensed over the options’ vesting periods. There have been no stock options issued during the nine months of 2020 or 2019. Stock options of 23,923 vested and became exercisable with the merger with CSFL on June 7, 2020.
September 30, 2020, there was no unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock option grants under the plans. The total fair value of shares vested for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $1.4 million.
Restricted Stock
We from time-to-time also grant shares of restricted stock to key employees and non-employee directors. These awards help align the interests of these employees and directors with the interests of our shareholders by providing economic value directly related to increases in the value of our stock. The value of the stock awarded is established as the fair market value of the stock at the time of the grant. We recognize expenses, equal to the total value of such awards, ratably over the vesting period of the stock grants. Restricted stock grants to employees typically “cliff vest” after four years. Grants to non-employee directors typically vest within a 12-month period.
All restricted stock agreements are conditioned upon continued employment, or service in the case of directors. Termination of employment prior to a vesting date, as described below, would terminate any interest in non-vested shares. Prior to vesting of the shares, as long as employed by the Company, the key employees and non-employee directors will have the right to vote such shares and to receive dividends paid with respect to such shares. All restricted shares will fully vest in the event of change in control of the Company or upon the death of the recipient. Due to the merger between the Company and CSFL effective June 7, 2020, a total of 29,303 restricted stock awards became fully vested.
Nonvested restricted stock for 2020 is summarized in the following table. All information has been retroactively adjusted for stock dividends and stock splits.
Weighted-
Grant-Date
Nonvested at January 1, 2020
69,450
58.96
Assumed restricted stock shares from CSFL merger
9,755
Granted
9,145
55.96
Vested
(71,193)
58.76
Forfeited
(317)
65.86
Nonvested at September 30, 2020
16,840
58.81
As of September 30, 2020, there was $736,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock granted under the plans. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.61 years as of September 30, 2020. The total fair value of shares vested during the nine months ended 2020 was $4.3 million.
Restricted Stock Units
We, from time-to-time, also grant performance RSUs and time-vested RSUs to key employees. These awards help align the interests of these employees with the interests of our shareholders by providing economic value directly related to our performance. Some performance RSU grants contain a three-year performance period while others contain a one-year performance period and a time-vested requirement (generally four years from the grant date). We communicate threshold, target, and maximum performance RSU awards and performance targets to the applicable key employees at the beginning of a performance period. Due to the merger with CSFL, all legacy and assumed performance based restricted stock units converted to a time-vesting requirement. Dividends are not paid in respect to the awards during the performance or time-vested period. The value of the RSUs awarded is established as the fair market value of the stock at the time of the grant. We recognize expenses on a straight-line basis typically over the performance and vesting/or time-vesting periods based upon the probable performance target, as applicable, that will be met. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, we accrued for 100.0% of the RSUs granted. Due to the merger between the Company and CSFL effective June 7, 2020, a total of 242,018 restricted stock units became fully vested.
Nonvested RSUs for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 is summarized in the following table.
324,601
76.44
Assumed restricted stock units from CSFL merger
388,381
376,026
60.74
(274,847)
75.68
(66,992)
74.44
747,169
60.59
As of September 30, 2020 there was $33.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested RSUs granted under the plan. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.60 years as of September 30, 2020. The total fair value of RSUs vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $23.5 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2020, 31,435 restricted stock units that vested in 2019 were issued to the participants from the 2017 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Note 14 — Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
In the normal course of business, we make various commitments and incur certain contingent liabilities, which are not reflected in the accompanying financial statements. The commitments and contingent liabilities include guarantees, commitments to extend credit, and standby letters of credit. At September 30, 2020, commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit totaled $5.9 billion. As of September 30, 2020, the liability recorded for expected credit losses on unfunded commitments, excluding unconditionally cancellable exposures and letters of credit, was $43.2 million and recorded in Other Liabilities on the Balance Sheet. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for discussion of liability recorded for expected credit losses on unfunded commitments.
We have been named as defendant in various legal actions, arising from its normal business activities, in which damages in various amounts are claimed. We are also exposed to litigation risk related to the prior business activities of banks acquired through whole bank acquisitions as well as banks from which assets were acquired and liabilities assumed in FDIC-assisted transactions. Although the amount of any ultimate liability with respect to such matters cannot be determined, in the opinion of Management, as of September 30, 2020, any such liability is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Note 15 — Fair Value
FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP, and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB ASC Topic 820 clarifies that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions.
We utilize fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Available for sale and trading securities, derivative contracts, and mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, we may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as impaired loans, OREO, and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
FASB ASC Topic 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1
Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2
Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3
Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets recorded at fair value.
Trading Securities
The fair values of trading securities are determined as follows: (1) for those securities that have traded prior to the date of the consolidated balance sheet but have not settled (date of sale) until after such date, the sales price is used as the fair value; and, (2) for those securities which have not traded as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet, the fair value was determined by broker price indications of similar or same securities.
Investment Securities
Securities available for sale are valued on a recurring basis at quoted market prices where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable securities. Level 1 securities include those traded on an active exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange and The NASDAQ Stock Market. Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities and debentures issued by government sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities, or U.S. Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter markets and money market funds. Securities held to maturity are valued at quoted market prices or dealer quotes similar to securities available for sale. The carrying value of FHLB and FRB stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage loans held for sale are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in current period earnings. The fair values of mortgage loans held for sale are based on commitments on hand from investors within the secondary market for loans with similar characteristics. As such, the fair value adjustments for mortgage loans held for sale are recurring Level 2.
We do not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan may be considered impaired and an ACL may be established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, Management measures impairment using estimated fair value methodologies. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At September 30, 2020, approximately half of the impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral because such loans were considered collateral dependent. Impaired loans, where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral; require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, we consider the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or Management determines the fair value of the
collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, we consider the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.
Other Real Estate Owned
OREO, consisting of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, is typically reported at fair value, determined on the basis of current appraisals, comparable sales, and other estimates of value obtained principally from independent sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs (Level 2). However, OREO is considered Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy because Management has qualitatively applied a discount due to the size, supply of inventory, and the incremental discounts applied to the appraisals. Management also considers other factors, including changes in absorption rates, length of time the property has been on the market and anticipated sales values, which have resulted in adjustments to the collateral value estimates indicated in certain appraisals. At the time of foreclosure, any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the real estate held as collateral is treated as a charge against the ACL. Gains or losses on sale and generally any subsequent adjustments to the value are recorded as a component of OREO expense.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Fair value is estimated using pricing models of derivatives with similar characteristics or discounted cash flow models where future floating cash flows are projected and discounted back; and accordingly, these derivatives are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. (See Note 17—Derivative Financial Instruments for additional information).
The estimated fair value of MSRs is obtained through an independent derivatives dealer analysis of future cash flows. The evaluation utilizes assumptions market participants would use in determining fair value including market discount rates, prepayment speeds, servicing income, servicing costs, default rates and other market driven data, as well as the market’s perception of future interest rate movements. MSRs are classified as Level 3.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The tables below present the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
Quoted Prices
In Active
Significant
Markets
for Identical
Observable
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 1)
(Level 2)
(Level 3)
Derivative financial instruments
Trading securities
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasuries
Total securities available for sale
5,005,684
4,971,106
16,252
2,062,187
2,031,662
31,273
24,402
1,953,603
1,924,929
43,373
46
Changes in Level 1, 2 and 3 Fair Value Measurements
When a determination is made to classify a financial instrument within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, the determination is based upon the significance of the unobservable factors to the overall fair value measurement. However, since Level 3 financial instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or Level 3 components, observable components (that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources), the gains and losses below include changes in fair value due in part to observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology.
There were no changes in hierarchy classifications of Level 3 assets or liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2020. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of Level 3 assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019 is as follows:
Fair value, January 1, 2020
Servicing assets that resulted from transfers of financial assets (1)
17,668
Changes in fair value due to valuation inputs or assumptions
(7,540)
Changes in fair value due to decay
(6,075)
Fair value , September 30, 2020
Fair value, January 1, 2019
34,727
Servicing assets that resulted from transfers of financial assets
4,506
(7,218)
(3,341)
Fair value, September 30, 2019
There were no unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income related to Level 3 financial assets and liabilities at September 30, 2020 or 2019.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The tables below present the recorded amount of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis:
Impaired loans
15,024
Non-acquired impaired loans
15,444
10,620
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurement
Weighted Average
Valuation Technique
Unobservable Input
Nonrecurring measurements:
Discounted appraisals and discounted cash flows
Collateral discounts
OREO and premises held for sale
Discounted appraisals
Collateral discounts and estimated costs to sell
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We used the following methods and assumptions in estimating our fair value disclosures for financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those models are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rates and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. The use of different methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The fair value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to Management as of September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019. Such amounts have not been revalued for purposes of these consolidated financial statements since those dates and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and Cash Equivalents — The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Trading Securities — The fair values of trading securities are determined as follows: (1) for those securities that have traded prior to the date of the consolidated balance sheet but have not settled (date of sale) until after such date, the sales price is used as the fair value; and, (2) for those securities which have not traded as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet, the fair value was determined by broker price indications of similar or same securities.
Investment Securities — Securities available for sale are valued at quoted market prices or dealer quotes. The carrying value of FHLB and FRB stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions. The carrying value of our investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries approximates fair value. See Note 5—Investment Securities for additional information, as well as page 44 regarding fair value.
Loans held for sale — The fair values disclosed for loans held for sale are based on commitments from investors for loans with similar characteristics.
Loans — ASU 2016-01 - Financial Instruments – Overall – Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities became effective for us on January 1, 2018. This accounting standard requires us to calculate the fair value of our loans for disclosure purposes based on an estimated exit price. With ASU 2016-01, to estimate an exit price, all loans (fixed and variable) are being valued with a discounted cash flow analyses for loans that includes our estimate of future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loans. Fair values for certain mortgage loans (e.g., one-to-four family residential) and other consumer loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on our current rates offered for new loans of the same type, structure and credit quality. Fair values for other loans (e.g., commercial real estate and investment property mortgage loans, commercial and industrial loans) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses-using interest rates we currently offer for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for non-performing loans are estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis.
Deposit Liabilities — The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest bearing checking, passbook savings, and certain types of money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts, and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate
certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase — The carrying amount of federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values.
Other Borrowings — The fair value of other borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis on our current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of instruments.
Accrued Interest — The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.
Derivative Financial Instruments — The fair value of derivative financial instruments (including interest rate swaps) is estimated using pricing models of derivatives with similar characteristics or discounted cash flow models where future floating cash flows are projected and discounted back.
Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit and Financial Guarantees — The fair values of commitments to extend credit are estimated taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair values of guarantees and letters of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated costs to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.
The estimated fair value, and related carrying amount, of our financial instruments are as follows:
Financial assets:
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
25,140,453
109,954
11,086
98,868
Interest rate swap - non-designated hedge
931,386
Other derivative financial instruments (mortgage banking related)
21,650
Financial liabilities:
29,989,297
706,723
1,089,637
1,087,636
11,464
933,357
Interest rate swap - cash flow hedge
41,798
Off balance sheet financial instruments:
Commitments to extend credit
82,940
11,452,003
36,774
8,500
28,274
15,350
11,406,477
298,741
815,936
818,210
4,916
16,693
13,791
789
36,031
11,259,351
36,131
7,528
28,603
21,700
11,302,479
269,072
815,771
818,294
5,036
19,564
23,723
7,622
Note 16 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, were as follows:
Unrealized Gains
and Losses
Gains and
on Securities
Losses on
Benefit
Available
Cash Flow
Plans
for Sale
Hedges
Balance at June 30, 2020
(149)
48,315
(35,427)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
1,494
1,622
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
(12)
2,697
2,685
Net comprehensive income
Balance at September 30, 2020
49,797
(32,602)
Balance at June 30, 2019
12,944
(11,181)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
5,824
(3,891)
1,933
(341)
(188)
(529)
Net comprehensive income (loss)
Balance at September 30, 2019
18,427
(15,260)
Balance at December 31, 2019
11,922
(10,756)
37,887
(26,638)
11,249
4,792
4,780
Balance at December 31, 2018
(6,450)
(18,394)
34,732
(14,766)
19,966
2,089
(457)
7,785
The table below presents the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Component
Income StatementLine Item Affected
(Gains) losses on cash flow hedges:
Interest rate contracts
Interest expense
(Gains) losses on sales of available for sale securities:
Securities gains (losses), net
Losses and amortization of defined benefit pension:
Actuarial losses
Total reclassifications for the period
Note 17 — Derivative Financial Instruments
We use certain derivative instruments to meet the needs of customers as well as to manage the interest rate risk associated with certain transactions. The following table summarizes the derivative financial instruments utilized by the Company:
Balance Sheet
Notional
Estimated Fair Value
Location
Gain
Loss
Cash flow hedges of interest rate risk on FHLB Advances:
Pay fixed rate swap with counterparty
Other Liabilities
700,000
Fair value hedge of interest rate risk:
20,850
2,379
2,769
260
Not designated hedges of interest rate risk:
Customer related interest rate contracts:
Matched interest rate swaps with borrowers
Other Assets and Other Liabilities
8,639,838
931,355
509,395
Matched interest rate swaps with counterparty
934,946
23,400
Not designated hedges of interest rate risk - mortgage banking activities:
Contracts used to hedge mortgage servicing rights
175,500
388
134,000
Contracts used to hedge mortgage pipeline
Other Assets
821,733
21,262
145,625
Total derivatives
18,997,759
2,001,184
Cash Flow Hedge of Interest Rate Risk
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk in the course of its business operations and manages a portion of this risk through the use of derivative financial instruments, in the form of interest rate swaps. We account for interest rate swaps that are classified as cash flow hedges in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, which requires that all derivatives be recognized as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet at fair value. We have three cash flow hedges as of September 30, 2020. For more information regarding the fair value of our derivative financial instruments, see Note 15 to these financial statements.
For the three cash flow hedges, we utilize interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk related to funding through short term FHLB advances. In March 2019, we entered into three-month FHLB advances for $350 million and $150 million for which at this time we plan to continuously renew. At the same time, we entered into interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $350 million and $150 million to manage the interest rate risk related to these FHLB advances. In June 2019, we entered into a three-month FHLB advance for $200 million for which at this time we plan to continuously renew. At the same time, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $200 million to manage the interest rate risk related to this FHLB advance. With our plan to continually renew and reprice the FHLB advances every three months, we are treating this funding as variable rate funding. We are hedging the cash flows from these FHLB advances against future interest rate increases by using an interest rate swap that effectively fixed the rate on the debt. The notional amount on which the interest payments are based will not be exchanged related to these interest rate swaps. The derivative contract on the $350 million notional amount calls for us to pay a fixed rate of 2.44% and receive a variable rate of three-month LIBOR (0.23% at September 30, 2020). The derivative contract on the $150 million notional amount calls for us to pay a fixed rate of 2.21% and receive a variable rate of three-month LIBOR (0.23% at September 30, 2020). The derivative contract on the $200 million notational amount calls for us to pay a fixed rate of 1.89% and receive a variable rate of three-month LIBOR (0.25% at September 30, 2020). The hedge for $350 million expires on March 23, 2023, the hedge for $150 million expires on March 29, 2024, and the hedge for the $200 million expires on June 3, 2024.
For derivatives designated as hedging exposure to variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction (cash flow hedge), the derivative’s entire gain or loss is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings or when the hedge is terminated. For derivatives that are not designated as hedging instruments, changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recognized in earnings immediately.
For designated hedging relationships, we have a third party perform retrospective and prospective effectiveness testing on a quarterly basis using quantitative methods to determine if the hedge is still highly effective. Hedge accounting ceases on transactions that are no longer deemed highly effective, or for which the derivative has been terminated or de-designated.
We recognized gains (losses) on our cash flow hedges in other comprehensive income of $2.8 million and ($21.8) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively. This compares to an unrealized loss of $4.1 million and $15.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. We recognized a $41.8 million cash flow hedge liability in other liabilities on the balance sheet at September 30, 2020, compared to a $19.6 million liability in other liabilities on the balance sheet at September 30, 2019. There was no ineffectiveness in the cash flow hedge during the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2020 and 2019. (See Note 16 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income for activity in accumulated other comprehensive income and the amounts reclassified into earnings related the cash flow hedges.)
Credit risk related to the derivative arises when amounts receivable from the counterparty (derivatives dealer) exceed those payable. We control the risk of loss by only transacting with derivatives dealers that are national market makers whose credit ratings are strong. Each party to the interest rate swap is required to provide collateral in the form of cash or securities to the counterparty when the counterparty’s exposure to a mark-to-market replacement value exceeds certain negotiated limits. These limits are typically based on current credit ratings and vary with ratings changes. As of September 30, 2020, we provided $50.9 million of collateral on the cash flow hedges on the FHLB advances which is also included in cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet as deposits in other financial institutions (restricted cash). Also, we have a netting agreement with the counterparties.
Balance Sheet Fair Value Hedge
We maintain loan swaps, with an aggregate notional amount of $20.8 million at September 30, 2020, accounted for as fair value hedges in accordance with ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. This derivative protects us from interest rate risk caused by changes in the LIBOR curve in relation to a certain designated fixed rate loan. The derivative converts the fixed rate loan to a floating rate. Settlement occurs in any given period where there is a difference in the stated fixed rate and variable rate and the difference is recorded in net interest income. The fair value of this hedge is recorded in either other assets or in other liabilities depending on the position of the hedge with the offset recorded in loans. There was no gain or loss recorded on these derivatives the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 or 2019.
Non-designated Hedges of Interest Rate Risk
Customer Swap
We maintain interest rate swap contracts with customers that are classified as non-designated hedges and are not speculative in nature. These agreements are designed to convert customer’s variable rate loans with the Company to fixed rate. These interest rate swaps are executed with loan customers to facilitate a respective risk Management strategy and allow the customer to pay a fixed rate of interest to the Company. These interest rate swaps are simultaneously hedged by executing offsetting interest rate swaps with unrelated market counterparties to minimize the net risk exposure to the Company resulting from the transactions and allow the Company to receive a variable rate of interest. The interest rate swaps pay and receive interest based on a floating rate based on one month LIBOR plus credit spread, with payments being calculated on the notional amount. The interest rate swaps are settled monthly with varying maturities.
As the interest rate swaps associated with this program do not meet the strict hedge accounting requirements, changes in the fair value of both the customer swaps and the offsetting swaps are recognized directly in earnings. As of September 30, 2020, the interest rate swaps had an aggregate notional amount of approximately $17.3 billion and the fair value of the interest rate swap derivatives are recorded in other assets at $931.4 million and in other liabilities at $935.0 million for a net liability position of $3.6 million. Changes in the fair market value of these interest rate swaps is recorded through earnings. As of September 30, 2019, the interest rate swaps had an aggregate notional amount of approximately $1.0 billion and the fair value of the interest rate swap derivatives are recorded in other assets at $21.7 million and in other liabilities at $23.5 million for a net liability position of $1.8 million. The increase between the periods presented is mainly due to the merger with CSFL. As of September 30, 2020, we provided $877.2 million of cash collateral on the customer swaps which is included in cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet as deposits in other financial institutions (restricted cash). We also provided $496.5 million in investment securities at market value as collateral on the customer swaps which is included in investment securities – available for sale.
Foreign Exchange
We also enter into foreign exchange contracts with customers to accommodate their need to convert certain foreign currencies into to U.S. Dollars. To offset the foreign exchange risk, we have entered into substantially identical agreements with an unrelated market counterparty to hedge these foreign exchange contracts. At September 30, 2020 and 2019, there were no outstanding contracts or agreements related to foreign currency. If there were foreign currency contracts outstanding at September 30, 2020, the fair value of these contracts would be included in other assets and other liabilities in the accompanying balance sheet. All changes in fair value are recorded as other noninterest income. There was no gain or loss recorded related to the foreign exchange derivative for the three months ended September 30, 2020 or 2019.
Mortgage Banking
We also have derivatives contracts that are classified as non-designated hedges. These derivatives contracts are a part of our risk Management strategy for our mortgage banking activities. These instruments may include financial forwards, futures contracts, and options written and purchased, which are used to hedge MSRs; while forward sales commitments are typically used to hedge the mortgage pipeline. Such instruments derive their cash flows, and therefore their values, by reference to an underlying instrument, index or referenced interest rate. We do not elect hedge accounting treatment for any of these derivative instruments and as a result, changes in fair value of the instruments (both gains and losses) are recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Income in mortgage banking income.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Derivatives contracts related to MSRs are used to help offset changes in fair value and are written in amounts referred to as notional amounts. Notional amounts provide a basis for calculating payments between counterparties but do not represent amounts to be exchanged between the parties, and are not a measure of financial risk. On September 30, 2020, we had derivative financial instruments outstanding with notional amounts totaling $175.5 million related to MSRs, compared to $134.0 million on September 30, 2019. The estimated net fair value of the open contracts
54
related to the MSRs was recorded as a gain of $389,000 at September 30, 2020, compared to a loss of $86,000 at September 30, 2019.
Mortgage Pipeline
The following table presents our notional value of forward sale commitments and the fair value of those obligations along with the fair value of the mortgage pipeline.
Mortgage loan pipeline
752,251
80,785
148,749
Expected closures
616,274
60,588
111,561
Fair value of mortgage loan pipeline commitments
23,004
1,160
2,071
Forward sales commitments
87,773
Fair value of forward commitments
(1,741)
(258)
631
Note 18 — Capital Ratios
We are subject to regulations with respect to certain risk-based capital ratios. These risk-based capital ratios measure the relationship of capital to a combination of balance sheet and off-balance sheet risks. The values of both balance sheet and off-balance sheet items are adjusted based on the rules to reflect categorical credit risk. In addition to the risk-based capital ratios, the regulatory agencies have also established a leverage ratio for assessing capital adequacy. The leverage ratio is equal to Tier 1 capital divided by total consolidated on-balance sheet assets (minus amounts deducted from Tier 1 capital). The leverage ratio does not involve assigning risk weights to assets.
Under current regulations, the Company and the Bank are subject to a minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital (“CET1”) to risk-weighted assets of 4.5%. and a minimum required ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 6%. The minimum required leverage ratio is 4%. The minimum required total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio is 8%.
In order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executives, under the new rules a covered banking organization is also required to maintain a “capital conservation buffer” in addition to its minimum risk-based capital requirements. This buffer is required to consist solely of CET1, and the buffer applies to all three risk-based measurements (CET1, Tier 1 capital and total capital). The capital conservation buffer became fully phased-in on January 1, 2019 and consists of an additional amount of Tier 1 common equity equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets.
The Bank is also subject to the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, which identifies five capital categories for insured depository institutions (well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized) and is based on specified thresholds for each of the three risk-based regulatory capital ratios (CET1, Tier 1 capital and total capital) and for the leverage ratio.
The following table presents actual and required capital ratios as of September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019 for the Company and the Bank under the current capital rules. Capital levels required to be considered well capitalized are based upon prompt corrective action regulations.
Required to be
Minimum Capital
Considered Well
Actual
Required - Basel III
Capitalized
Ratio
Capital Amount
Common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets:
Consolidated
2,940,041
11.48
1,792,999
7.00
1,664,927
6.50
SouthState Bank (the Bank)
3,052,492
11.95
1,788,172
1,660,445
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets:
2,177,213
8.50
2,049,141
8.00
2,171,352
2,043,625
Total capital to risk-weighted assets:
3,550,019
13.86
2,689,498
10.50
2,561,427
10.00
3,270,970
12.80
2,682,258
2,554,531
Tier 1 capital to average assets (leverage ratio):
8.12
1,447,730
4.00
1,809,663
5.00
8.46
1,442,936
1,803,670
1,326,725
11.30
822,225
763,495
1,417,616
12.07
822,218
763,488
1,438,995
12.25
998,416
939,686
998,407
939,677
1,501,321
12.78
1,233,338
1,174,607
1,479,942
12.60
1,233,327
1,174,597
9.73
591,731
739,664
9.59
591,592
739,490
1,302,034
11.22
812,276
754,257
1,392,599
12.00
812,284
754,263
1,414,138
12.19
986,336
928,316
986,345
928,324
1,474,728
12.71
1,218,415
1,160,395
1,453,189
12.52
1,218,426
1,160,405
9.72
581,786
727,232
9.58
581,648
727,060
As of September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019, and September 30, 2019, the capital ratios of the Company and the Bank were well in excess of the minimum regulatory requirements and exceeded the thresholds for the “well capitalized” regulatory classification.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 which required an entity to utilize a new impairment model known as the CECL model to estimate its lifetime “expected credit loss.” This standard was adopted and became effective on January 1, 2020 and the Company applied the provisions of the standard using the modified retrospective method as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. Related to the implementation of ASU 2016-13, we recorded additional allowance for credit losses for loans of $54.4 million, deferred tax assets of $12.6 million, an additional reserve for unfunded commitments of $6.4 million and an adjustment to retained earnings of $44.8 million. Instead of recognizing the effects from ASU 2016-13 at adoption, the standard included a transitional method option for recognizing the Day 1 effects on the Company’s regulatory capital calculations over a three year phase-in. In March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the regulatory agencies provided an additional transitional method option of a two-year deferral for the start of the three year phase-in of the recognition of the Day 1 effects of ASU 2016-13 along with an option to defer the current impact on regulatory capital calculations of ASU 2016-13 during the first two years (“5 year method”). Under this 5-year method, the Company would recognize an estimate of the previous incurred loss method for determining the allowance for credit losses in regulatory capital calculations and the difference from the CECL method would be deferred for two years. After two years, the effects from Day 1 and the deferral difference from the first two years of applying CECL would be phased-in over three years using the straight-line method. The regulatory rules provide a one-time opportunity at the end of the first quarter of 2020 for covered banking organizations to choose its transition option for CECL. The Company chose the 5-year method and is deferring the recognition of the effects from Day 1 and the CECL difference from the first two years of application.
56
Note 19—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The carrying amount of goodwill was $1.6 billion at September 30, 2020, compared to $1.0 billion at December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019. The Company added $563.6 million in goodwill related to the CSFL merger in 2020. The Company’s other intangible assets, consisting of core deposit intangibles, noncompete intangibles, and client list intangibles are included on the face of the balance sheet. The Company added $125.9 million in core deposit intangible and $10.0 million in client list intangibles related to the CSFL merger in 2020.
The Company completed its annual valuation of the carrying value of its goodwill as of April 30, 2020. We determined that no impairment charge was necessary at this time. We will continue to monitor the impact of COVID-19 on the Company’ business, operating results, cash flows and/or financial condition.
Our other intangible assets, consisting of core deposit intangibles, noncompete intangibles, and client list intangibles are included on the face of the balance sheet. The following is a summary of gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets:
Gross carrying amount
258,162
119,501
Accumulated amortization
(86,525)
(69,685)
(66,418)
Amortization expense totaled $9.6 million and $17.2 million, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively, compared to $3.3 million and $9.8 million, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively. Other intangibles are amortized using either the straight-line method or an accelerated basis over their estimated useful lives, with lives generally between two and 15 years. Estimated amortization expense for other intangibles for each of the next five quarters is as follows:
Quarter ending:
December 31,2020
9,437
March 31,2021
8,831
June 30,2021
8,613
September 30,2021
8,201
December 31,2021
8,200
128,355
Note 20 — Loan Servicing, Mortgage Origination, and Loans Held for Sale
As of September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019, and September 30, 2019, the portfolio of residential mortgages serviced for others, which is not included in the accompanying balance sheets, was $4.5 billion, $3.3 billion, and $3.1 billion, respectively. Servicing loans for others generally consists of collecting mortgage payments, maintaining escrow accounts and disbursing payments to investors. The amount of contractually specified servicing fees we earned during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019 was $2.5 million and $6.8 million, and $1.9 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Servicing fees are recorded in mortgage banking income in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
At September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019, and September 30, 2019, MSRs were $34.6 million, $30.5 million, and $28.7 million on our consolidated balance sheets, respectively. MSRs are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as a component of mortgage banking income in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The market value adjustments related to MSRs recorded in mortgage banking income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019 were a gain of $1.0 million and a loss of $9.1 million, compared with losses of $2.3 million and $7.2 million, respectively. We used various free-standing derivative instruments to mitigate
57
the income statement effect of changes in fair value due to changes in market value adjustments and to changes in valuation inputs and assumptions related to MSRs.
See Note 15 — Fair Value for the changes in fair value of MSRs. The following table presents the changes in the fair value of the MSR and offsetting hedge.
Increase (decrease) in fair value of MSRs
1,020
(2,294)
(9,078)
Decay of MSRs
(2,391)
(1,312)
(5,590)
Gain related to derivatives
619
1,476
10,915
5,415
Net effect on statements of income
(752)
(2,130)
(3,753)
(5,144)
The fair value of MSRs is highly sensitive to changes in assumptions and fair value is determined by estimating the present value of the asset’s future cash flows utilizing market-based prepayment rates, discount rates and other assumptions validated through comparison to trade information, industry surveys and with the use of independent third-party appraisals. Changes in prepayment speed assumptions have the most significant impact on the fair value of MSRs. Generally, as interest rates increase, mortgage loan prepayments decelerate due to decreased refinance activity, which results in an increase in the fair value of the MSRs. Measurement of fair value is limited to the conditions existing and the assumptions utilized as of a particular point in time, and those assumptions may not be appropriate if they are applied at a different time. See Note 15 — Fair Value for additional information regarding fair value.
The characteristics and sensitivity analysis of the MSRs are included in the following table.
Composition of residential loans serviced for others
Fixed-rate mortgage loans
99.9
99.8
Adjustable-rate mortgage loans
0.1
0.2
100.0
Weighted average life
5.52
years
6.55
6.10
Constant Prepayment rate (CPR)
14.3
10.3
11.4
Weighted average discount rate
9.0
9.4
Effect on fair value due to change in interest rates
25 basis point increase
2,533
2,477
2,398
50 basis point increase
5,178
4,452
4,390
25 basis point decrease
(2,400)
(2,938)
(2,862)
50 basis point decrease
(3,665)
(6,228)
(5,999)
The sensitivity calculations in the previous table are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. Changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the changes in assumptions to fair value may not be linear. Also, the effects of an adverse variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the MSRs is calculated without changing any other assumptions, while in reality, changes in one factor may result in changing another, which may magnify or contract the effect of the change.
Custodial escrow balances maintained in connection with the loan servicing were $48.1 million and $33.7 million at September 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, respectively.
Whole loan sales were $1.3 billion and $2.0 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, respectively, compared to $216.1 million and $517.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, $1.1 billion and $1.7 billion, or 87.2% and 86.3%, were sold with the servicing rights retained by the company, compared to $175.9 million and $412.4 million, or 81.4% and 79.6%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019.
Loans held for sale have historically been comprised of residential mortgage loans awaiting sale in the secondary market, which generally settle in 15 to 45 days. Loans held for sale were $456.1 million, $59.4 million and $87.4 million at September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, respectively.
Note 21 – Repurchase Agreements
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”) represent funds received from customers, generally on an overnight or continuous basis, which are collateralized by investment securities owned or, at times, borrowed and re-hypothecated by the Company. Repurchase agreements are subject to terms and conditions of the master repurchase agreements between the Company and the client and are accounted for as secured borrowings. Repurchase agreements are included in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
At September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, our repurchase agreements totaled $355.0 million, $242.2 million, and $235.5 million, respectively. All of our repurchase agreements were overnight or continuous (until-further-notice) agreements at September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019. These borrowings were collateralized with government, government-sponsored enterprise, or state and political subdivision-issued securities with a carrying value of $412.3 million, $242.2 million and $235.5 million at September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, respectively. Declines in the value of the collateral would require us to increase the amounts of securities pledged.
Note 22 – Subsequent Events
On October 15, 2020, the Company announced that its Correspondent Banking Division will be expanding through the acquisition of Duncan-Williams, Inc. (“Duncan-Williams”), a 52-year-old family- and employee-owned registered broker-dealer, headquartered in Memphis, Tennessee, serving primarily institutional clients across the U.S. in the fixed income business. The transaction has been approved by the Company’s board of directors and is expected to close in the first quarter of 2021, subject to receipt of regulatory approvals and compliance with other customary closing conditions. Upon completion of the transaction, Duncan-Williams will become an operating subsidiary of the Bank.
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) relates to the financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report beginning on page 3. For further information, refer to the MD&A appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. Results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2020 or any future period.
Unless otherwise mentioned or unless the context requires otherwise, references herein to “South State,” the “Company” “we,” “us,” “our” or similar references mean South State Corporation and its consolidated subsidiary. References to the “Bank” means South State Corporation’s wholly owned subsidiary, SouthState Bank, National Association, a national banking association.
Overview
South State Corporation is a financial holding company headquartered in Winter Haven, Florida, and was incorporated under the laws of South Carolina in 1985. We provide a wide range of banking services and products to our customers through our wholly owned bank subsidiary, SouthState Bank, National Association (the “Bank”), a national banking association. The Bank also operates South State Advisory, Inc. (formerly First Southeast 401K Fiduciaries), a wholly owned registered investment advisor. Through the merger with CenterState Bank Corporation (“CSFL”) in the second quarter of 2020, the Bank also owns CBI Holding Company, LLC (“CBI”), which in turn owns Corporate Billing, LLC (“Corporate Billing”), a transaction-based finance company headquartered in Decatur, Alabama that provides factoring, invoicing, collection and accounts receivable management services to transportation companies and automotive parts and service providers nationwide. Also, through the merger with CSFL in the second quarter of 2020, the holding company operates R4ALL, Inc., which manages troubled loans purchased from the Bank to their eventual disposition and SSB Insurance Corp., a captive insurance subsidiary pursuant to Section 831(b) of the U.S. Tax Code.
At September 30, 2020, we had approximately $37.8 billion in assets and 5,266 full-time equivalent employees. Through the Bank, we provide our customers with a full range of consumer, commercial, mortgage, wealth management and SBA banking services, including checking accounts, NOW accounts, savings and time deposits of various types, brokerage services and alternative investment products such as annuities and mutual funds, trust and asset management services, business loans, agriculture loans, real estate loans, personal use loans, home improvement loans, manufactured housing loans, automobile loans, credit cards, letters of credit, home equity lines of credit, safe deposit boxes, bank money orders, and wire transfer services, through branch, ATM and digital banking channels through a six (6) state footprint in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia. We also operate a correspondent banking division within our national bank subsidiary, of which the majority of its bond salesmen, traders and operational personnel are housed in facilities located in Birmingham, Alabama and Atlanta, Georgia. This division’s primary revenue generating activities are related to its capital markets division, which includes commissions earned on fixed income security sales, fees from hedging services, loan brokerage fees and consulting fees for services related to these activities; and its correspondent banking division, which includes spread income earned on correspondent bank deposits (i.e., federal funds purchased) and correspondent bank checking account deposits and fees from safe-keeping activities, bond accounting services for correspondents, asset/liability consulting related activities, international wires, and other clearing and corporate checking account services.
We have pursued, and continue to pursue, a growth strategy that focuses on organic growth, supplemented by acquisitions of select financial institutions, or branches in certain market areas.
The following discussion describes our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and also analyzes our financial condition as of September 30, 2020 as compared to December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019. Like most financial institutions, we derive most of our income from interest we receive on our loans and investments. Our primary source of funds for making these loans and investments is our deposits, on which we may pay interest. Consequently, one of the key measures of our success is the amount of our net interest income, or the difference between the income on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the expense on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits.
Another key measure is the spread between the yield we earn on these interest-earning assets and the rate we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities.
Of course, there are risks inherent in all loans, as such we maintain an allowance for credit losses, otherwise referred to herein as ACL, to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. We establish and maintain this allowance by charging a provision for credit losses against our operating earnings. In the following discussion, we have included a detailed discussion of this process.
In addition to earning interest on our loans and investments, we earn income through fees and other services we charge to our customers. We incur costs in addition to interest expense on deposits and other borrowings, the largest of which is salaries and employee benefits. We describe the various components of this noninterest income and noninterest expense in the following discussion.
The following sections also identify significant factors that have affected our financial position and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying financial statements. We encourage you to read this discussion and analysis in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes and the other statistical information also included in this report.
Recent Events
COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic has severely restricted the level of economic activity in our markets. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the governments of all of the states in which we have financial centers and of most other states have taken preventative or protective actions, such as imposing restrictions on travel and business operations, advising or requiring individuals to limit or forego their time outside of their homes, and ordering temporary closures of some businesses that have been deemed to be non-essential.
While our business has been designated an essential business, which allows us to continue to serve our customers, we serve many customers that were deemed, or who were employed by businesses that were deemed, to be non-essential. Although states in our market area have allowed businesses to reopen in the second and third quarters of 2020 that were deemed non-essential, there are still many restrictions, and our customers are still being adversely effected by the COVID-19 pandemic. In many of the states in our market area, as the economies have been allowed to reopen, there has been an increase in cases of COVID-19 and some restrictions have been reinstated.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is fluid and continues to evolve. The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated impacts on trade (including supply chains and export levels), travel, employee productivity, unemployment, consumer spending, and other economic activities has resulted in less economic activity, lower equity market valuations and increased volatility and disruption in financial markets, and has had an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of general operations, with a more limited impact to our mortgage and correspondent banking business lines. The ultimate extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, financial condition and results of operations is uncertain and will depend on various developments and other factors, including, among others, the duration and scope of the pandemic, as well as governmental, regulatory and private sector responses to the pandemic, and the associated impacts on the economy, financial markets and our customers, employees and vendors.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations generally rely upon the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, the value of collateral underlying our secured loans, and demand for loans and other products and services we offer, which are highly dependent on the business environment in our primary markets where we operate and in the United States as a whole. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on our business and operations. As part of our efforts to practice social distancing, in March 2020, we closed all of our banking lobbies and began conducting most of our business through drive-thru tellers and through electronic and online means. To support the health and well-being of our employees, we allowed a majority of our workforce to work from home. In October 2020, we have begun to reopen our banking lobbies in our branch locations, but a majority of our support staff is still working from home. To support our customers or to comply with law, we have deferred loan payments from 90 to 180 days for consumer and commercial customers. For customers directly impacted by the COVID-19, we suspended residential property foreclosure sales, evictions, and involuntary automobile repossessions, and are offering fee waivers, payment deferrals, and other expanded assistance for automobile, mortgage, small business and personal lending customers.
Future governmental actions may require more of these and other types of customer-related responses. For non-FHA insured loans that were not directly impacted by the COVID-19, normal collection efforts and foreclosure filings resumed at the end of the third quarter 2020. Eviction actions remain suspended through 12/31/20 per Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Agency Order 2020-19654.
As of October 23, 2020, we have deferrals of $452 million, or 1.98%, of our total loan portfolio, excluding loans held for sale and Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loans. For commercial loans, the standard deferral was 90 days for both principal and interest, 120 days of principal only or 180 days of interest only. For consumer and mortgage loans, the standard deferral was 120 days of both principal and interest or 180 days of interest only. We have actively reached out to our customers to provide guidance and direction on these deferrals. In terms of available lines of credit, the company has not experienced an increase in borrowers drawing down on their lines. As of September 30, 2020, below are the loan portfolios which we view are of the greatest risk:
Also, we have extended credit to both customers and non-customers related to the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). As of September 30, 2020, we have produced approximately 20,000 loans totaling approximately $2.4 billion through the PPP. While deferrals have decreased materially during the third quarter, given the fluidity of the pandemic and the risk there may be new lockdowns or restrictions on business activities to slow the spread of the virus, there is no guarantee that some loan not currently on deferral might return to deferral status.
A restructuring that results in only a delay in payments that is insignificant is not considered an economic concession. In accordance with the CARES Act, the Company implemented loan modification programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in order to provide borrowers with flexibility with respect to repayment terms. The Company’s payment relief assistance includes forbearance, deferrals, extension and re-aging programs, along with certain other modification strategies. The Company elected the accounting policy in the CARES Act to suspend TDR accounting to loans modified for borrowers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic if the concession meets the criteria defined under the CARES Act.
We are monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our results of operations and financial condition. We implemented ASU 2016-13 in the first quarter of 2020 related to the calculation for our ACL for loans, investments, unfunded commitments and other financial assets. Considering the COVID-19 pandemic in our CECL models and moving to one CECL model (with the merged bank) during the third quarter of 2020, we recorded a provision for credit losses of $29.8 million in the third quarter of 2020 which was significantly higher than the third quarter of 2019 but significantly less than the second quarter of 2020 when the provision for credit losses was comprised of three major components: (1) $119.1 million for the day 1 provision for loans without significant credit deterioration (“Non-PCD”) acquired from CSFL, (2) $31.3 million from the legacy South State loan portfolio, and (3) $1.1 million from the acquired CSFL loan portfolio since the merger date. We also adjust our investment securities portfolio to market each period end and review for any impairment that would require a provision for credit losses. At this time, we have determined there is no need for a provision for credit losses related to our investment securities portfolio. Because of changing economic and market conditions affecting issuers, we may be required to recognize impairments in the future on the securities we hold, as well as reductions in other comprehensive income. We cannot currently determine the ultimate impact of the pandemic on the long-term value of our portfolio.
We also are monitoring the impact of COVID-19 on the valuation of goodwill. Additional detail in regards to the goodwill analysis is disclosed below under the Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets section of the Recent Events.
62
CenterState Bank Corporation Merger
On June 7, 2020, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of CSFL, the financial holding company for CenterState Bank National Association (“CSB”), in a stock transaction. Pursuant to the merger agreement, (i) CSFL merged with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”), and (ii) immediately following the Merger, SouthState Bank (“SSB”), a South Carolina banking corporation and wholly owned bank subsidiary of the Company, merged with and into CSB, a national banking association and wholly owned bank subsidiary of CSFL, with CSB continuing as the surviving bank (the “Bank Merger”). In connection with the Bank Merger, CSB changed its name to “SouthState Bank, National Association” (hereinafter referred to as the “Bank”). CSFL common shareholders received 0.3001 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for each share of CSFL stock resulting in the Company issuing 37,271,069 shares of its common stock. In total, the purchase price for CSFL was $2.3 billion including the value of the conversion of outstanding warrants, stock options and restricted stock units totaling $15.4 million.
In the acquisition, the Company acquired $13.0 billion of loans (excluding loans held for sale) at fair value, net of $239.5 million, or 1.82%, estimated discount to the outstanding principal balance. Of the total loans acquired, Management identified $3.1 billion with credit deficiencies that were identified as Purchased Credit Deteriorated (“PCD”) loans. The Company assumed $15.6 billion in deposits including a $20.2 million premium for fixed maturity time deposits.
As a result of the Bank Merger, the Bank is now a national banking association that is subject to primary
supervision and regulation by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) and subject to the National Bank Act and is no longer subject to supervision and regulation by the South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is no longer the Bank’s primary federal regulator, and the Bank is now a member of the Federal Reserve System.
Branch Consolidation
As a part of the ongoing evaluation of customer service delivery and efficiencies, the Company announced the closing and consolidation of 20 branch locations in November of 2020. The expected cost associated with these closures and cost initiatives is estimated to be approximately $5.0 million, and primarily includes personnel, facilities and equipment cost. The annual savings in 2021 of these closures is expected to be $7.0 million, and the impact on 2020 is anticipated to be approximately $825,000. Eleven of the locations are in Florida, five in South Carolina, two in North Carolina, one in Georgia and one in Alabama.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared based on the application of accounting policies in accordance with GAAP and follow general practices within the banking industry. Our financial position and results of operations are affected by Management’s application of accounting policies, including estimates, assumptions and judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of assets and liabilities and amounts reported for revenues and expenses. Differences in the application of these policies could result in material changes in our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations and related disclosures. Understanding our accounting policies is fundamental to understanding our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations. Accordingly, our significant accounting policies and changes in accounting principles and effects of new accounting pronouncements are discussed in Note 2 and Note 3 of our consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Note 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The following is a summary of our critical accounting policies that are highly dependent on estimates, assumptions and judgments.
Allowance for Credit Losses or ACL
The ACL reflects Management’s estimate of losses that will result from the inability of our borrowers to make required loan payments. Due to the Merger between the Company and CSFL, effective June 7, 2020, Management collectively evaluated loans utilizing two different methodologies for the second quarter. Management adopted one methodology during the third quarter of 2020. Management used the one systematic methodology to determine its ACL
for loans held for investment and certain off-balance-sheet credit exposures. Management considers the effects of past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts on the collectability of the loan portfolio. The Company’s estimate of its ACL involves a high degree of judgment; therefore, Management’s process for determining expected credit losses may result in a range of expected credit losses. It is possible that others, given the same information, may at any point in time reach a different reasonable conclusion. The Company’s ACL recorded in the balance sheet reflects Management’s best estimate within the range of expected credit losses. The Company recognizes in net income the amount needed to adjust the ACL for Management’s current estimate of expected credit losses. See Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for further detailed descriptions of our estimation process and methodology related to the ACL. See also Note 7 — Allowance for Credit Losses in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, “Provision for Credit Losses and Nonperforming Assets” in this MD&A.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the sum of the estimated fair values of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired less the estimated fair value of the liabilities assumed in a business combination. As of September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, the balance of goodwill was $1.6 billion, $1.0 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively. Goodwill has an indefinite useful life and is evaluated for impairment annually or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, which simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment for all entities by requiring impairment charges to be based on Step 1 of the previous accounting guidance’s two-step impairment test under ASC Topic 350. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The new standard eliminates the requirement to calculate a goodwill impairment charge using Step 2 which involved calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated impairment. The standard does not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity will still be able to perform today’s optional qualitative goodwill impairment assessment before determining whether to proceed to the quantitative step of determining whether the reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds it fair value. This guidance was effective for the Company as of January 1, 2020.
We evaluated the carrying value of goodwill as of April 30, 2020, our annual test date, considering the effects of COVID-19 and determined that no impairment charge was necessary. Our stock price has historically traded above its book value and tangible book value. However, during the first quarter of 2020, our stock price fell below book value and has remained below book value during the second and third quarter of 2020. This drop in stock price was in reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic, which has affected stock prices of companies in almost all industries. The lowest trading price for our stock during the first nine months of 2020 was $40.42, and the stock price closed on September 30, 2020 at $48.15, which was below book value of $64.34 but above tangible book value of $39.83. The Company completed its annual valuation of the carrying value of goodwill as of April 30, 2020, taking into account the Company’s drop in stock price in 2020, and taking into account the effect that the COVID-19 pandemic has had and continues to have on the U.S. economy and the economies of the markets in which we operate. Along with its internal analysis, the Company received a limited independent third party valuation of its goodwill, and based upon the valuation and our analysis, we determined that no impairment charge was necessary at this time. We will continue to monitor the impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition. If the COVID-19 pandemic continues and the economy continues to deteriorate and our stock price remains at current levels, we will have to reevaluate the impact on our financial condition and potential impairment of goodwill.
Core deposit intangibles, client list intangibles, and noncompetition (“noncompete”) intangibles consist primarily of amortizing assets established during the acquisition of other banks. This includes whole bank acquisitions and the acquisition of certain assets and liabilities from other financial institutions. Core deposit intangibles represent the estimated value of long-term deposit relationships acquired in these transactions. Client list intangibles represent the value of long-term client relationships for the correspondent banking and wealth and trust management business. Noncompete intangibles represent the value of key personnel relative to various competitive factors such as ability to compete, willingness or likelihood to compete, and feasibility based upon the competitive environment, and what the Bank could lose from competition. These costs are amortized over the estimated useful lives, such as deposit accounts in the case of core deposit intangible, on a method that we believe reasonably approximates the anticipated benefit stream from this intangible. The estimated useful lives are periodically reviewed for reasonableness.
64
Income Taxes and Deferred Tax Assets
Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of the transactions reported in our condensed consolidated financial statements and consist of taxes currently due plus deferred taxes related to differences between the tax basis and accounting basis of certain assets and liabilities, including available-for-sale securities, ACL, write downs of OREO properties, accumulated depreciation, net operating loss carry forwards, accretion income, deferred compensation, intangible assets, mortgage servicing rights, and post-retirement benefits. The deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the future tax return consequences of those differences, which will either be taxable or deductible when the assets and liabilities are recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. A valuation allowance is recorded in situations where it is “more likely than not” that a deferred tax asset is not realizable. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return. Additionally, income tax returns are filed by the Company or its subsidiaries in the states of Alabama, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia. We evaluate the need for income tax reserves related to uncertain income tax positions but had no material reserves at September 30, 2020 or 2019.
Other Real Estate Owned and Bank Property Held For Sale
Other real estate owned (“OREO”) consists of properties obtained through foreclosure or through a deed in lieu of foreclosure in satisfaction of loans. Prior to the merger with CSFL, we classified former branch sites as held for sale OREO. During the second quarter of 2020 and with the merger with CSFL, the Company elected to reclassify these assets as bank property held for sale and report on a separate line within the balance sheet. Both OREO and bank property held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value and the fair value was determined on the basis of current valuations obtained principally from independent sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs. At the time of foreclosure or initial possession of collateral, for OREO, any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the real estate held as collateral is treated as a charge against the ACL. At the time a bank property is no longer in service and is moved to held for sale, any excess of the current book value over fair value is recorded as an expense in the Statement of Net Income. Subsequent adjustments to this value are described below in the following paragraph.
We report subsequent declines in the fair value of OREO and bank properties held for sale below the new cost basis through valuation adjustments. Significant judgments and complex estimates are required in estimating the fair value of these properties, and the period of time within which such estimates can be considered current is significantly shortened during periods of market volatility. In response to market conditions and other economic factors, Management may utilize liquidation sales as part of its problem asset disposition strategy. As a result of the significant judgments required in estimating fair value and the variables involved in different methods of disposition, the net proceeds realized from sales transactions could differ significantly from the current valuations used to determine the fair value of these properties. Management reviews the value of these properties periodically and adjusts the values as appropriate. Revenue and expenses from OREO operations as well as gains or losses on sales and any subsequent adjustments to the value are recorded as OREO expense and loan related expense, a component of non-interest expense.
Results of Operations
We reported consolidated net income of $95.2 million, or diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) of $1.34, for the third quarter of 2020 as compared to consolidated net income of $51.6 million, or diluted EPS of $1.50, in the comparable period of 2019, a 84.7% increase in consolidated net income and a 10.7% decrease in diluted EPS. The $43.6 million increase in consolidated net income was the net result of the following items:
Total nonperforming assets (“NPAs”) decreased by $15.8 million from June 30, 2020 to $126.2 million as of September 30, 2020 due to lower acquired nonaccrual loans and lower acquired OREO. The year over year change totaled $88.7 million, and was the result of the merger with CSFL on June 7, 2020, and the increase related to loans formerly accounted for as credit impaired loans (with ASU 2016-13 are now considered PCD loans), prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13. Acquired credit impaired loans were considered to be performing in prior periods, due to the application of the accretion method under FASB ASC Topic 310-30. NPAs as a percentage of total loans and repossessed assets declined by 6 basis points for the period ended September 30, 2020 to 50 basis points compared to 56 basis points at June 30, 2020, respectively, and increased by 17 basis points as compared to September 30, 2019. This increase was related to the addition of the non-accrual acquired credit impaired loans into NPAs due to the adoption of ASU 2016-13. Nonperforming assets have been reduced by former bank property held for sale. Prior to the merger, the Company included this information in nonperforming assets but is now reported as a separate item on the balance sheet. All periods have been reclassified to reflect this change. NPAs increased $85.4 million from $40.8 million at December 31, 2019. This increase was primarily related to the merger with CSFL and the change due to ASU 2016-13 referenced above. Annualized net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2020 were 0.01% of total average loans, or $594,000.
Non-acquired NPAs increased $2.6 million from $20.7 million at September 30, 2019 to $23.3 million at September 30, 2020, which resulted from a $3.3 million increase in non-acquired nonperforming loans. Non-acquired NPAs as a percentage of non-acquired loans and repossessed assets declined to 0.20% at September 30, 2020 from 0.23% at September 30, 2019. Non-acquired NPAs decreased $539,000 from $23.8 million at December 31, 2019. Acquired NPAs increased $86.1 million from $16.8 million at September 30, 2019 to $102.9 million at September 30, 2020, which was due primarily to the merger with CSFL and the adoption of ASU 2016-13 referenced above.
With the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, the Company changed its method for calculating its allowance for loans from an incurred loss method to a life of loan method. See Note 2 – Significant Accounting Policies and Note 7 – Allowance for Credit Losses for further details. At September 30, 2020, the ACL was $440.2 million, or 1.74% of period end loans. Additionally, with the adoption of ASU 2016-13, the Company recorded separately a reserve for unfunded commitments of $43.2 million, or 0.94% of unfunded commitments, excluding unconditionally cancellable exposures and letters of credit. For prior comparative periods, the ACL was $434.6 million, or 1.70%, of period-end loans at June 30, 2020 and the allowance for loan losses on loans was $54.9 million, or 0.49%, at September 30, 2019. The ACL provides 3.91 times coverage of nonperforming loans at September 30, 2020. At December 31, 2019 and
66
September 30, 2019, the allowance for loan losses on non-acquired nonperforming loans provided coverage of 2.50 times and 2.86 times, respectively. We continued to show solid and stable asset quality numbers and ratios as of September 30, 2020. The increase in the ACL was the result of the following:
During the third quarter of 2020, acquired loan interest income increased $102.2 million compared to the second quarter of 2020. The yield on acquired loans was down to 4.76% at September 30, 2020 from 5.08% at June 30, 2020. The decrease in the yield in the third quarter of 2020 was primarily the result of the continued low interest rate environment. Loan accretion income recognized in the third quarter of 2020 totaled $22.4 million and included the full third quarter of loan accretion income from the CSFL acquired loan portfolio. Accretion income increased from $10.1 million in the second quarter of 2020 to $22.4 million in the third quarter of 2020. Acquired period-end loan balances decreased by $1.2 billion and acquired loans average balance increased by $8.8 billion, from June 30, 2020, due to the merger with CSFL.
The table below provides an analysis of the yield on our total loan portfolio, excluding loans held for sale, including both non-acquired and acquired loans. The acquired loan yield decreased from the third quarter of 2019 due to the PPP loans acquired in the CSFL merger and overall lower rate environment. Non-acquired loan yields also declined due to the low yielding PPP loans originated during the third quarter of 2020.
Average balances:
Acquired loans, net of allowance for loan losses only in comparative period
14,108,652
2,471,851
7,157,214
2,702,836
Non-acquired loans
11,203,980
8,753,742
10,361,318
8,433,419
Total loans, excluding held for sale
25,312,632
11,225,593
17,518,532
11,136,255
Accretion income on acquired loans
22,445
8,070
43,484
26,356
Acquired loan interest income
146,343
31,310
227,663
103,030
Total acquired loans
168,788
39,380
271,147
129,386
107,886
95,032
304,440
271,697
276,674
134,412
575,587
401,083
Non-taxable equivalent yield:
Acquired loans
4.76
6.32
5.06
6.40
3.83
4.31
4.35
4.75
4.39
4.82
Compared to the balance at June 30, 2020, our non-acquired loan portfolio increased $0.9 billion, or 35.2% annualized, to $11.5 billion, driven by growth in all categories except other loans. Commercial and industrial loans and commercial owner occupied loans led the way with $366.6 million and $214.8 million in quarterly loan growth, respectively, or 62.9% and 45.6% annualized growth, respectively. The acquired loan portfolio decreased by $1.2 billion, or 32% annualized, to $13.7 billion in the third quarter of 2020 compared to $14.9 billion at June 30, 2020, from paydowns and payoffs in both the PCD and NonPCD loan categories. Since September 30, 2019, the non-acquired loan
67
portfolio has grown by $2.6 billion, or 29.2%, driven by increases in all loan categories. The largest increases were in the following three categories: Commercial and industrial loans with $1.6 billion in loan growth, commercial owner occupied loan growth with $411.5 million, and commercial non-owner occupied loans of $333.1 million. Since September 30, 2019, the acquired loan portfolio increased by $11.3 billion, or 480.2% due to the merger with CSFL.
Compared to the second quarter of 2020, non-taxable equivalent net interest income increased $107.8 million or 66.3% due to the first full quarter of results after the merger with CSFL. The increase in net interest income during the third quarter of 2020 was mainly due to the increase in interest income on loans of $110.5 million (non-acquired loans interest income increased $8.2 million and acquired loans interest income increased $102.2 million), an increase in interest income on loans held for sale of $2.7 million and higher interest income from investment securities of $0.8 million. Interest expense increased $6.9 million during the quarter with the increase in the average balances of interest-bearing liabilities of $8.3 billion from the merger with CSFL in June. Rates dropped on funding cost by eight basis points as the Bank continued to adjust deposit pricing during the third quarter of 2020 with the low interest rate environment. Interest expense from deposits increased by $2.5 million, from corporate and subordinated debt by $3.1 million, and from other borrowings by $1.2 million. The increase in interest income on non-acquired loans was due to an increase in the average balance of $757.5 million, which was the result of overall loan growth during the third quarter of 2020. The effects from the increase in the average balance on non-acquired loans was partially offset by the decline in yield of 1 basis point due to the continued low rate environment that arose from the COVID-19 pandemic and the CARES Act passed in early Spring of 2020. Acquired loan interest income improved by $102.2 million as the average balance increased by $8.8 billion (the result of a full quarter of loans outstanding) partially offset by the effects from a 32 basis points decrease on the yield for acquired loans, which was attributed to the lower rate environment and PPP loans. The increase in interest income from investment securities was due to a higher average balance of $920.5 million from the merger with CSFL during the second quarter of 2020 partially offset by a lower yield. Interest income on federal funds sold, reverse repurchase agreements and interest-earning deposits increased by $0.8 million. The increase in interest income from federal funds sold, reverse repurchase agreements and interest-earning deposits was due to an increase in yield of 2 basis points and the full effect for the quarter on a much higher average balance from the merger with CSFL, an increase of $2.4 billion compared to the prior quarter. The increase in interest income from loans held for sale was due to an increase in the average balance of $353.4 million, primarily from the merger with CSFL. The increase in interest expense on interest-bearing deposits and other borrowings was the result of the impact of the assumed balances from the CSFL merger being included for the full quarter compared to 23 days in the second quarter of 2020. The non-taxable equivalent net interest margin decreased during the third quarter of 2020 compared to the second quarter of 2020 by 2 basis points from 3.23% to 3.21%. The decrease in the net interest margin was due to the decrease in yield on interest-earning assets of 7 basis points offset by 8 basis point decline in the yield on interest-bearing liabilities. The decline in the overall cost of funds, including demand deposits of 6 basis points reflects the full quarter impact of the merger with CSFL on all categories of deposits resulting in a 9 basis point decline in the cost of total deposits. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in the cost of corporate and subordinated debentures and other borrowings, resulting from full quarter impact of balances assumed from the CSFL merger along with the increase in cost on the cash flow hedges on the Federal Home Loan Bank advances.
Compared to the third quarter of 2019, non-taxable equivalent net interest income increased $143.0 million, or 112.2%, and the non-taxable equivalent net interest margin decreased to 3.21% from 3.72%. For further discussion of the comparison of net interest income and net interest margin for the periods ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, see Net Interest Income and Margin section below on page 70.
Our quarterly efficiency ratio decreased to 61.4% in the third quarter of 2020 compared to 80.5% in the second quarter of 2020 and increased from 58.4% in the third quarter of 2019. The decrease in the efficiency ratio compared to the second quarter of 2020 was the result of a $168.2 million, or 77.6%, increase in net interest income and noninterest income, partially offset by a $61.8 million, or 35.3%, increase in noninterest expense. These increases were the result of including the income and expense for a full quarter from the merger with CSFL in the third quarter of 2020 compared to only 23 days in the second quarter of 2020. Within noninterest income, the mortgage banking business continues to benefit from low interest rate environment coupled with the correspondent banking business added from the merger with CSFL.
Diluted and basic EPS were $1.34 and $1.34, respectively for the third quarter of 2020, compared to the third quarter of 2019 which were $1.51 and $1.50, respectively. The increase in net income in the third quarter of 2020 was attributable to the first full quarter of income and expense after the merger with CSFL, which occurred in early June 2020. In addition, the Company had $21.7 million in merger-related expense in the current quarter compared to no
merger-related expense or branch conversion cost in the third quarter of 2019. In addition, the weighted average common shares increased to 71.1 million shares, or 107.2%, due to the merger with CSFL compared to 34.3 million weighted average shares outstanding at September 30, 2019. The total number of shares outstanding at September 30, 2020 totaled 70,928,304, which includes 37.3 million shares issued in the merger with CSFL in June of 2020. The increase in net income was due to the full quarter impact of the CSFL merger in the third quarter of 2020, which did not affect any of the third quarter of 2019. The increase in outstanding shares from September 30, 2019 was due to the merger with CSFL.
Selected Figures and Ratios
Return on average assets (annualized)
1.00
1.31
0.18
1.20
Return on average equity (annualized)
8.31
8.70
1.41
7.76
Return on average tangible equity (annualized)*
14.66
16.62
3.51
14.88
Dividend payout ratio
35.01
28.48
188.71
30.70
Equity to assets ratio
14.92
Average shareholders’ equity
4,556,061
2,351,154
3,268,998
2,366,017
* - Denotes a non-GAAP financial measure. The section titled “Reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP” below provides a table that reconciles GAAP measures to non-GAAP measures.
Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP
The return on average tangible equity is a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the effect of the average balance of intangible assets and adds back the after-tax amortization of intangibles to GAAP basis net income. Management believes these non-GAAP financial measures provide additional information that is useful to investors in evaluating our performance and capital and may facilitate comparisons with other institutions in the banking industry as well as period-to-period comparisons. Non-GAAP measures should not be considered as an alternative to any measure of performance or financial condition as promulgated under GAAP, and investors should consider South State’s performance and financial condition as reported under GAAP and all other relevant information when assessing the performance or financial condition of South State. Non-GAAP measures have limitations as analytical tools, are not audited, and may not be comparable to other similarly titled financial measures used by other companies. Investors should not consider non-GAAP measures in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of South State’s results or financial condition as reported under GAAP.
69
Return on average equity (GAAP)
Effect to adjust for intangible assets
6.35
7.92
2.10
7.12
Return on average tangible equity (non-GAAP)
Average shareholders’ equity (GAAP)
Average intangible assets
(1,763,255)
(1,057,818)
(1,353,300)
(1,061,109)
Adjusted average shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP)
2,792,806
1,293,336
1,915,698
1,304,908
Net income (loss) (GAAP)
(1,875)
(658)
(1,272)
(1,968)
Net income excluding the after-tax effect of amortization of intangibles (non-GAAP)
102,906
54,175
50,356
145,241
Net Interest Income and Margin
Summary
Our taxable equivalent (“TE”) net interest margin for the third quarter of 2020 decreased by 51 basis points from 3.73% in the third quarter of 2019 to 3.22%. This decrease was due to a decrease in the yield of interest-earning assets of 87 basis points; partially offset by a decline in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities of 47 basis points.
Non-TE net interest margin also decreased by 51 basis points from the third quarter of 2019, for the same reason as above. The decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets was due to a decrease in the yield on federal funds sold, reverse repurchase agreements and interest-earning deposits of 205 basis point, a decrease in the yield on investment securities of 106 basis point, a decrease in yield on non-acquired loans of 48 basis points and a decrease in yield on acquired loans of 156 basis points. The decrease in these yields was mostly due to the falling interest rate environment resulting from the drops in the federal funds rate made by the Federal Reserve during 2019 and in March 2020. The overall yield on interest-earning assets also decreased due to the significant increase in the average balance on federal funds sold, reverse repurchase agreements and interest earning deposit, the Company’s lowest yielding assets, which increased $3.9 billion or 796.3%. This increase was partially due to the merger with CSFL and due to the decision to hold more liquidity during the current COVID-19 pandemic and recessionary economic pressures. The effects from the decrease in yield on interest-earning assets were partially offset by a decline in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 47 basis points from 0.92% in the third quarter of 2019 to 0.45% in the third quarter of 2020. This decrease in cost on interest-bearing liabilities was due to a decrease in the cost of all categories of interest-bearing deposits and a decrease in the cost of federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements. The decreases were the result of the falling interest rate environment in the last half of 2019 and first quarter of 2020. The cost of corporate and subordinated debentures and other borrowings increased from the third quarter of 2019 to the third quarter in 2020 by 78 basis points to 3.39%. This increase was due the higher cost in the subordinated debentures assumed in the merger with CSFL in the second quarter of 2020 along with the rising costs of the cash flow hedges on our $700 million of FHLB Advances.
Non-TE net interest income
Non-TE yield on interest-earning assets
4.38
3.68
4.47
Non-TE rate on interest-bearing liabilities
0.45
0.92
0.55
Non-TE net interest margin
3.21
3.72
3.31
3.81
TE net interest margin
3.22
3.73
3.33
3.82
70
Non-TE net interest income increased $143.0 million, or 112.2%, in the third quarter of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019. Some key highlights are outlined below:
The following table presents a summary of the loan portfolio by category (excludes loans held for sale):
LOAN PORTFOLIO (ENDING BALANCE)
% of
Acquired loans:
Acquired - non-purchased credit deteriorated loans:
656,767
2.6
0.3
0.5
2,609,141
3.9
4.5
1,938,306
7.7
2.7
3.1
1,598,723
6.3
4.4
4.8
693,342
2.8
1.7
1.8
2,537,953
10.1
0.9
1.1
298,437
1.2
0.8
Consumer non real estate
224,804
Total acquired - non-purchased credit deteriorated loans
41.9
15.5
17.5
Acquired - purchased credit deteriorated loans (PCD):
137,114
15,332
16,767
1,216,813
65,388
0.6
76,960
0.7
818,524
3.2
67,491
71,060
517,629
2.1
91,690
98,567
91,580
0.4
50,660
53,507
197,121
3,588
4,588
77,631
32,240
37,829
87,410
35,457
36,754
Total acquired - purchased credit deteriorated loans (PCD)
12.5
3.4
13,701,729
54.4
2,122,273
18.6
2,361,635
20.9
1,046,230
4.1
8.5
2,110,418
8.4
15.9
15.7
2,089,190
8.3
14.9
2,194,834
8.7
18.8
562,876
2.2
4.6
2,684,046
10.6
11.3
10.0
253,429
1.0
1.9
2.0
587,957
2.3
4.7
7,106
45.6
81.4
79.1
Total loans (net of unearned income)
Total loans, net of deferred loan costs and fees (excluding mortgage loans held for sale), increased by $13.9 billion, or 123.5%, to $25.2 billion at September 30, 2020 as compared to the same period in 2019. Non-acquired loans or legacy loans increased by $2.6 billion, or 29.2%, from September 30, 2019 to September 30, 2020 through organic loan growth and PPP loans. Acquired loans increased by $11.3 billion, or 480.2% as compared to the same period in 2019. The overall increase in acquired loans was the addition of $13.0 billion due to the merger with CSB, net of $1.8 billion of principal payments, charge-offs, foreclosures and renewals of acquired loans. Acquired loans as a percentage of total loans increased to 54.4% at September 30, 2020 compared to 20.9% at September 30, 2019. As of September 30, 2020, non-acquired loans as a percentage of the overall portfolio were 45.6% compared to 79.1% at September 30, 2019.
Average total loans
Interest income on total loans
Non-TE yield
Interest earned on loans increased $142.3 million in the third quarter of 2020 compared to the third quarter of 2019. Some key highlights for the quarter ended September 30, 2020 are outlined below:
We use investment securities, our second largest category of earning assets, to generate interest income through the deployment of excess funds, provide liquidity, fund loan demand or deposit liquidation, and pledge as collateral for public funds deposits and repurchase agreements. At September 30, 2020, investment securities totaled $3.7 billion, compared to $2.0 billion and $1.9 billion at December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, respectively. Our investment portfolio increased $1.7 billion from December 31, 2019 and increased $1.9 billion from September 30, 2019 mainly due to the acquisition of $1.2 billion in investment securities in the merger with CSFL. Excluding investment securities acquired in the CSFL merger, the investment securities portfolio increased by $548.0 million, or 36.51% (annualized), from December 31, 2019 and by $691.0 million, or 37.10% from September 30, 2019. The increase in investment securities from December 31, 2019 was a result of investments acquired in the CSFL merger of $1.2 billion, purchases of $1.3 billion as well as improvements in the market value of the available for sale investment securities portfolio of $48.6 million. These increases were partially offset by maturities, paydowns, sales and calls of investment securities totaling $770.9 million. Net amortization of premiums were $13.3 million in the first nine months of 2020. We continue to increase our investment securities strategically primarily with the excess funds from deposit growth. The increase in fair value in the available for sale investment portfolio in the first nine months of 2020 compared to December 31, 2019 was mainly due to the decrease in interest rates in March 2020 in reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Average investment securities
3,227,988
1,819,895
2,521,981
1,653,126
Interest income on investment securities
13,254
12,372
38,992
33,634
1.63
2.70
2.07
2.72
Interest earned on investment securities was higher in both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. This is a result of the Bank carrying a higher average balance in investment securities in 2020 compared to the same periods in 2019. The average balance of investment securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 increased $1.4 billion and $868.9 million, respectively from the comparable periods in 2019. With the excess liquidity from the growth in deposits during 2019 and the first nine months of 2020, the Bank used the excess funds to strategically increase the size of its investment portfolio. The increase in the average balance was also due to the acquisition of CSFL’s investment portfolio of $1.2 billion in June 2020. The yield on the investment portfolio declined 107 basis points and 65 basis points, respectively, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to the same periods in 2019 due to the falling interest rate environment resulting from the drop in the federal funds rate made by the Federal Reserve during 2019 and in March 2020.
Net Gain
BB or
(Loss)
AAA - A
BBB
Lower
Not Rated
13,127
444,086
1,982
Mortgage-backed securities *
50,593
396,286
2,612,276
63,842
870,254
2,627,833
* Agency mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) are guaranteed by the issuing government-sponsored enterprise (“GSE”) as to the timely payments of principal and interest. Except for Government National Mortgage Association securities, which have the full faith and credit backing of the United States Government, the GSE alone is responsible for making payments on this guaranty. While the rating agencies have not rated any of the MBS issued, senior debt securities issued by GSEs are rated consistently as “Triple-A.” Most market participants consider agency MBS as carrying an implied Aaa rating (S&P rating of AA+) because of the guarantees of timely payments and selection criteria of mortgages backing the securities. We do not own any private label mortgage-backed securities. The balances presented under the ratings above reflect the amortized cost of the investment securities.
At September 30, 2020, we had 113 securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position, which totaled $4.2 million. At December 31, 2019, we had 143 securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position, which totaled $4.5 million. At September 30, 2019, we had 95 securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position, which totaled $2.5 million.
As of September 30, 2020 as compared to December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, the total number of available for sale securities with an unrealized loss position decreased by 30 and increased by 18 securities, respectively, while the total dollar amount of the unrealized loss decreased by $352,000 and increased by $1.7 million, respectively. The decrease from December 31, 2019 in the number of securities in an unrealized loss position is due to the drop in both short and long term interest rates during the first half of 2020 related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The decrease in the amount of the unrealized loss was mainly due to the drop in both short and long term interest rates during the last half of 2019 and the first half of 2020. In particular, the Federal Reserve dropped the federal funds target rate 150 basis points to a range of 0.00% to 0.25% in March 2020 in reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic.
All debt securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2020 continue to perform as scheduled. We have evaluated the cash flows and determined that all contractual cash flows should be received; therefore impairment is temporary because we have the ability to hold these securities within the portfolio until the maturity or until the value recovers, and we believe that it is not likely that we will be required to sell these securities prior to recovery. We continue to monitor all of our securities with a high degree of scrutiny. There can be no assurance that we will not conclude in future periods that conditions existing at that time indicate some or all of its securities may be sold or would require a charge to earnings as a provision for credit losses in such periods. Any charges as a provision for credit losses related to investment securities could impact cash flow, tangible capital or liquidity. See Note 2 – Summary of Significant Account Policies and Note 5 – Investment securities for further discussion on the application of ASU 2016-13 on the investment securities portfolio.
As securities held for investment are purchased, they are designated as held to maturity or available for sale based upon our intent, which incorporates liquidity needs, interest rate expectations, asset/liability management strategies, and capital requirements. Although securities classified as available for sale may be sold from time to time to meet liquidity or other needs, it is not our normal practice to trade this segment of the investment securities portfolio. While Management generally holds these assets on a long-term basis or until maturity, any short-term investments or securities available for sale could be converted at an earlier point, depending partly on changes in interest rates and alternative investment opportunities.
Other Investments
Other investment securities include primarily our investments in FHLB and FRB stock with no readily determinable market value. Accordingly, when evaluating these securities for impairment, Management considers the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than recognizing temporary declines in value. As of September 30, 2020,
74
we determined that there was no impairment on our other investment securities. As of September 30, 2020, other investment securities represented approximately $185.2 million, or 0.49% of total assets and primarily consists of FHLB and FRB stock which totals $174.7 million, or 0.46% of total assets. There were no gains or losses on the sales of these securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
CSFL had a correspondent banking department that was merged with the Company on June 7, 2020. This department occasionally purchases trading securities and subsequently sells them to correspondent bank customers to take advantage of market opportunities, when presented, for short-term revenue gains. Securities purchased for this portfolio have been primarily municipal securities and are held for short periods of time. This portfolio is carried at fair value and realized and unrealized gains and losses are included in trading securities revenue, a component of Correspondent Banking and Capital Market Income in our Consolidated Statements of Net Income. At September 30, 2020, we had no trading securities.
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Interest-bearing liabilities include interest-bearing transaction accounts, savings deposits, CDs, other time deposits, federal funds purchased, and other borrowings. Interest-bearing transaction accounts include NOW, HSA, IOLTA, and Market Rate checking accounts.
Average interest-bearing liabilities
22,049,240
9,724,089
15,355,805
9,492,455
Average rate
The quarter-to-date average balance of interest-bearing liabilities increased $12.3 billion in the third quarter of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 due to increase in interest-bearing deposits of $11.6 billion, an increase in federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements of $437.4 million and increase in other borrowings of $273.2 million. The increase in average interest-bearing deposits is due to the acquisition of $10.3 billion in interest-bearing deposits from the CSFL merger during the second quarter of 2020. We continue to focus on increasing core deposits (excluding certificates of deposits and other time deposits), which increased $310.6 million in the third quarter of 2020 and $15.6 billion since December 31, 2019. The increase from December 31, 2019 consisted of $12.9 billion through the merger and $2.7 billion, organically. These funds are normally lower cost funds. The increase in average federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements was also due the merger with CSFL. Federal funds purchased related to the correspondent bank division and repurchase agreements acquired in the merger with CSFL averaged $422.4 million during the third quarter of 2020 which makes up most of the increase. The increase in average corporate and subordinated debt and other borrowings was also due to the merger with CSFL as the Company assumed $271.5 million in subordinated debt and trust preferred debt in the second quarter of 2020. The increase in interest expense of $2.3 million in the third quarter of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 was driven by higher interest expense on corporate and subordinated debt and other borrowings of $3.9 million due to both the increase in average balance of $273.2 million and a higher average cost of 78 basis points. The higher cost on borrowings was due to the increase in cost on the cash flow hedges on the $700.0 million of FHLB borrowings and to the addition of the subordinated debt from the merger with CSFL which carried a higher average cost. Interest expense on interest-bearing deposits declined by $1.5 million in the third quarter of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019. The cost on interest-bearing deposits was 0.30% for the third quarter of 2020 compared to 0.77% for the same period in 2019. The decline in cost related to deposits was due to the falling interest rate environment resulting from the drops in the federal funds rate made by the Federal Reserve during 2019 and in March 2020. These changes resulted in a 47 basis point decrease in the average rate on all interest-bearing liabilities from 0.92% to 0.45% for the three months ended September 30, 2020. Some key highlights are outlined below:
Noninterest-Bearing Deposits
Noninterest-bearing deposits are transaction accounts that provide our Bank with “interest-free” sources of funds. Average noninterest-bearing deposits increased $6.5 billion, or 201.05%, to $9.8 billion in the third quarter of 2020 compared to $3.3 billion during the same period in 2019. At September 30, 2020, the period end balance of noninterest-bearing deposits was $9.7 billion, exceeding the September 30, 2019 balance by $6.4 billion. This increase in both period end and average assets was due to the noninterest-bearing deposits of $5.3 billion acquired in the merger with CSFL in June 2020. We continue to focus on increasing the noninterest-bearing deposits to try and limit our funding costs. Our overall cost of funds including noninterest-bearing deposits was 0.31% for the three months ended September 30, 2020 compared to 0.69% for the three months ended September 30, 2019.
Provision for Credit Losses
The Company merged with CenterState Bank Corporation (“CSFL” or “CenterState”) on June 7, 2020. For the second quarter ended June 30, 2020, given the proximity of the merger date to the quarter end, Management collectively evaluated loans from each legacy loan portfolio utilizing pre-existing methodologies implemented prior to the merger and aggregated the result. During the third quarter, Management consolidated the two methodologies into one to arrive at the ACL recorded at September 30, 2020 for both the ACL related to the loan portfolio and the reserve related to the unfunded commitments (off-balance-sheet credit exposures). The new methodology for unfunded commitments utilizes a funding rate, as opposed to a utilization rate which was a method applied to the SouthState legacy portfolio prior to the third quarter, to determine the reserve for each respective segment of unfunded commitments. This new method, along with the change in mix of unfunded commitments, resulted in an increase in the reserve for legacy SouthState Bank unfunded commitments during the third quarter of 2020.
Management considers forward-looking information in estimating expected credit losses. The Company subscribes to a third-party service which provides a quarterly macroeconomic baseline outlook and alternative scenarios for the United States economy. The baseline, along with the evaluation of alternative scenarios, is used by Management to determine the best estimate within the range of expected credit losses. The baseline forecast incorporates a 50% probability of the United States economy performing better than this projection and the same as the probability that it will perform worse. Management has evaluated the appropriateness of the reasonable and supportable forecast scenarios and has made adjustments as needed. For the contractual term that extends beyond the reasonable and supportable forecast period, the Company reverts to the long term mean of historical factors within four quarters using a straight-line approach. The Company generally utilizes a four quarter forecast and a four quarter reversion period.
When a loan no longer shares similar risk characteristics with its segment, the asset is assessed to determine whether it should be included in another pool or should be individually evaluated. During the third quarter of 2020, we consolidated the ACL models and due to the size of the combined company elected to increase the threshold for individually-evaluated loans to all non-accrual loans with a net book balance in excess of $1.0 million. We will monitor the credit environment and make adjustments to this threshold in the future if warranted. Based on the threshold above, consumer financial assets will generally remain in pools unless they meet the dollar threshold. The expected credit losses on individually-evaluated loans will be estimated based on discounted cash flow analysis unless the loan meets the criteria for use of the fair value of collateral, either by virtue of an expected foreclosure or through meeting the definition of collateral-dependent. Financial assets that have been individually evaluated can be returned to a pool for purposes of
estimating the expected credit loss insofar as their credit profile improves and that the repayment terms were not considered to be unique to the asset.
Management measures expected credit losses over the contractual term of a loan. When determining the contractual term, the Company considers expected prepayments but is precluded from considering expected extensions, renewals, or modifications, unless the Company reasonably expects it will execute a trouble debt restructuring (“TDR”) with a borrower. In the event of a reasonably-expected TDR, the Company factors the reasonably-expected TDR into the current expected credit losses estimate. For consumer loans, the point at which a TDR is reasonably expected is when the Company approves the borrower’s application for a modification (i.e., the borrower qualifies for the TDR) or when the Credit Administration department approves loan concessions on substandard loans. For commercial loans, the point at which a TDR is reasonably expected is when the Company approves the loan for modification or when the Credit Administration department approves loan concessions on substandard loans. The Company uses a discounted cash flow methodology for a TDR to calculate the effect of the concession provided to the borrower within the ACL.
A restructuring that results in only a delay in payments that is insignificant is not considered an economic concession. In accordance with the CARES Act, the Company implemented loan modification programs in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in order to provide borrowers with flexibility with respect to repayment terms. The Company’s payment relief assistance includes forbearance, deferrals, extension and re-aging programs, along with certain other modification strategies. The Company elected the accounting policy in the CARES Act to suspend TDR accounting to loans modified for borrowers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic if the concession meets the criteria as defined under the CARES Act.
For purchased credit-deteriorated, otherwise referred to herein as PCD, assets are defined as acquired individual financial assets (or acquired groups of financial assets with similar risk characteristics) that, as of the date of acquisition, have experienced a more-than-insignificant deterioration in credit quality since origination, as determined by the Company’s assessment. The Company records acquired PCD loans by adding the expected credit losses (i.e., allowance for credit losses) to the purchase price of the financial assets rather than recording through the provision for credit losses in the income statement. The expected credit loss, as of the acquisition day, of a PCD loan is added to the allowance for credit losses. The non-credit discount or premium is the difference between the unpaid principal balance and the amortized cost basis as of the acquisition date. Subsequent to the acquisition date, the change in the ACL on PCD loans is recognized through the provision for credit losses. The non-credit discount or premium is accreted or amortized, respectively, into interest income over the remaining life of the PCD loan on a level-yield basis. In accordance with the transition requirements within the standard, the Company’s acquired credit-impaired loans (i.e., ACI or Purchased Credit Impaired) were treated as PCD loans.
78
With the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, the Company changed its method for calculating it allowance for loans from an incurred loss method to a life of loan method. See Note 2 – Significant Accounting Policies and Note 7 – Allowance for Credit Losses for further details. As of September 30, 2020, the balance of the ACL was $440.2 million or 1.74% of total loans. The ACL increased $5.6 million from the balance of $434.6 million recorded at June 30, 2020. This increase during the third quarter of 2020 included a $7.7 million provision for credit losses partially offset by $0.6 million in net charge-offs and a $1.5 million adjustment to the PCD allowance related to measurement period adjustments on loans acquired from CSFL. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, the ACL increased $383.3 million from the balance of $56.9 million. This increase included a $181.4 million provision for credit losses during the period, a $149.4 million allowance for credit losses on PCD loans acquired from CSFL and an increase of $54.5 million through the impact of the initial adoption of CECL. These increases were partially offset by $2.0 million in net charge-offs. The impact of COVID-19 was modeled in the forecasted loss period and macroeconomic assumptions.
At September 30, 2020, the Company also had a reserve on unfunded commitments of $43.2 million which was recorded in Other Liabilities on the Balance Sheet, compared to $21.1 million at June 30, 2020. With the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, the Company increased its reserve on unfunded commitments by $6.5 million in the first quarter of 2020. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020, the provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments was $22.1 million and $36.4 million, respectively. Of these amounts, $9.6 million was related to the merger with CSFL during the second quarter of 2020. These amounts were recorded in the provision for credit losses on the Statements of Income. The Company did not have an allowance for credit losses or record a provision for credit losses on investment securities or other financials asset during the first nine months of 2020.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, the allowance for non-acquired loan losses was $54.9 million, or 0.62%, of non-acquired period-end loans. With the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020, the allowance was adjusted by $54.5 million. The ACL provides 3.91 times coverage of nonperforming loans at September 30, 2020. Net charge offs to the total average loans during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 were 0.01% and 0.02%, respectively. We continued to show solid and stable asset quality numbers and ratios as of September 30, 2020.
The following table provides the allocation, by segment, for expected credit losses.
%*
Residential Mortgage Senior
18.7
Residential Mortgage Junior
Revolving Mortgage
5.8
Residential Construction
2.5
Other Construction and Development
5.1
3.7
Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate
20.2
Non Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate
24.1
Commercial and Industrial
* Loan balance in each category expressed as a percentage of total loans excluding PPP loans.
The following table presents a summary of the changes in the ACL, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020:
Non-PCD
PCD
280,301
154,307
Allowance Adjustment - FMV for CenterState merger
(2,783)
(1,859)
1,911
2,137
(872)
278
7,077
610
286,506
153,653
Total loans, net of unearned income:
At period end
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans (annualized)
0.01
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of period end loans
1.74
Allowance for credit losses as a percentage of period end non-performing loans (“NPLs”)
391.47
Allowance for credit losses at January 1
Adjustment for implementation of CECL
54,438
(7,480)
(2,816)
4,308
3,979
(3,172)
1,163
181,721
(322)
181,399
0.02
80
The following table presents a summary of the changes in the ALLL, for comparative periods, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13 as follows:
Acquired
Non-credit
Credit
Impaired
Provision for loan losses
Reductions due to loan removals
Total non-acquired loans:
Net charge-offs as a percentage of average non-acquired loans (annualized)
0.05
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of period end non-acquired loans
0.62
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of period end non-performing non-acquired loans (“NPLs”)
286.32
0.03
81
Nonperforming Assets
The following table summarizes our nonperforming assets for the past five quarters:
June 30,
March 31,
Non-acquired:
Nonaccrual loans
18,078
19,011
19,773
19,724
18,310
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
636
419
119
333
Restructured loans - nonaccrual
3,749
3,453
4,020
Total nonperforming loans
22,463
22,883
23,912
22,816
19,187
Other real estate owned (“OREO”) (3) (7)
726
1,181
784
875
1,394
Other nonperforming assets (4)
99
508
136
Total non-acquired nonperforming assets
23,288
24,572
24,853
23,827
20,651
Acquired:
Nonaccrual loans (1)
89,067
99,346
32,548
907
1,053
Total acquired nonperforming loans (2)
89,974
100,399
32,791
11,114
Acquired OREO and other nonperforming assets:
Acquired OREO (3) (8)
12,754
16,836
6,648
5,664
7,030
Other acquired nonperforming assets (4)
154
184
177
Total acquired OREO and other nonperforming assets
12,904
16,987
6,802
5,848
7,207
Total nonperforming assets
126,166
141,958
64,446
40,789
37,454
Excluding Acquired Assets
Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans and repossessed assets (5)
0.20
0.23
0.26
Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets (6)
0.06
0.07
0.15
0.13
Nonperforming loans as a percentage of period end loans (5)
0.19
0.22
0.25
0.21
Including Acquired Assets
0.50
0.56
0.36
0.33
0.38
0.39
0.24
0.48
0.49
0.30
Total nonperforming assets were $126.2 million, or 0.50% of total loans and repossessed assets, at September 30, 2020, a decrease of $15.8 million, or 11.1%, from June 30, 2020, and an increase of $88.7 million, or 236.9%, from September 30, 2019. Total nonperforming loans were $112.4 million, or 0.45%, of total loans, at September 30, 2020, a decrease of $10.8 million, or 8.8%, from June 30, 2020, and an increase of $83.7 million, or 290.6%, from September 30, 2019. Non-acquired nonperforming loans declined by $0.4 million from June 30, 2020. Acquired nonperforming loans declined $10.4 million from June 30, 2020. The increase in the acquired nonperforming loan balances in the above schedule at September 30, 2020, compared to September 30, 2019, was due to the addition of the above mentioned loans related to the merger with CSB, as well as the addition of $21.0 million in the first quarter of 2020, formerly accounted for as credit impaired loans (with ASU 2016-13 are now considered PCD loans). Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, acquired credit impaired loans were considered to be performing, due to the application of the accretion method under FASB ASC Topic 310-30. The Company has not assumed or taken on any additional risk relative to these assets. There was an increase in non-acquired nonperforming loans of $3.3 million from September 30, 2019, which were primarily restructured loans.
At September 30, 2020, OREO totaled $13.5 million which included $0.7 million in non-acquired OREO and $12.8 million in acquired OREO. Total OREO decreased $4.5 million from June 30, 2020 and increased $5.1 million from September 30, 2019, which was primarily due to the CSB acquisition. At September 30, 2020, non-acquired OREO consisted of 8 properties with an average value of $91,000. This compared to 10 properties with an average value of $118,000 at June 30, 2020. At September 30, 2020, acquired OREO consisted of 47 properties with an average value of $271,000. This compared to 66 properties with an average value of $255,000 at June 30, 2020. In the third quarter of 2020, we added no new properties into non-acquired OREO, and we sold 2 properties with an aggregate value of $455,000. For acquired OREO we added 3 properties with an aggregate value of $205,000 and sold 22 properties with an aggregate value of $4.7 million during the current quarter.
Potential Problem Loans
Potential problem loans (excluding all acquired loans) totaled $3.9 million, or 0.03%, of total non-acquired loans outstanding, at September 30, 2020, compared to $4.2 million, or 0.04%, of total non-acquired loans outstanding, at June 30, 2020, and compared to $7.6 million, or 0.09% of total non-acquired loans outstanding, at September 30, 2019. Potential problem loans related to acquired loans totaled $22.7 million, or 0.17%, of total acquired loans outstanding, at September 30, 2020, compared to $29.6 million, or 0.20% of total acquired loans outstanding, at June 30, 2020. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13, prior period acquired problem loans included only the non-credit impaired loans. At September 30, 2019, the acquired non-credit impaired potential problem loans were $5.0 million, or 0.25%, of acquired non-credit impaired loans outstanding. All potential problem loans represent those loans where information about possible credit problems of the borrowers has caused Management to have serious concern about the borrower’s ability to comply with present repayment terms.
Noninterest Income
Noninterest income provides us with additional revenues that are significant sources of income. For the three months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, noninterest income comprised 29.8%, and 22.8%, respectively, of total net interest income and noninterest income. For the nine months ended September 30, 2020 and 2019, noninterest income comprised 27.5%, and 22.1%, respectively, of total net interest income and noninterest income.
Service charges on deposit accounts
15,809
13,382
38,228
38,828
Debit, prepaid, ATM and merchant card related income
8,537
6,343
20,938
17,446
4,127
8,038
4,399
4,444
6,087
Noninterest income increased by $77.2 million, or 205.4%, during the third quarter of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019. This quarterly change in total noninterest income primarily resulted from the following:
Noninterest income increased by $106.0 million, or 98.8%, during the first nine month of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019. This quarterly change in total noninterest income primarily resulted from the following:
Noninterest Expense
Business development and staff related expense
2,018
6,290
6,477
Supplies and printing
1,435
420
2,522
Postage expense
1,320
998
3,348
3,026
13,109
31,334
16,556
Noninterest expense increased by $140.5 million, or 145.8%, in the third quarter of 2020 as compared to the same period in 2019. The quarterly increase in total noninterest expense primarily resulted from the following:
Noninterest expense increased by $215.2 million, or 70.8%, in the first nine months of 2020 as compared to the same period in 2019. The categories and explanations for the increases year-to-date are similar to the ones noted above in the quarterly comparison.
85
Income Tax Expense
Our effective tax rate was 19.61% and 7.38% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2020 compared to 20.13% and 20.05% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019. The decrease in the effective tax rate for the quarter was driven mainly by generating pre-tax book income during the current quarter whereas the Company generated a pre-tax book loss during the second quarter of 2020, increasing the income tax benefit recorded on the rate-impacting items during that quarter. The lower year-to-date effective tax rate compared to the same period in 2019 is driven mainly by lower pre-tax book income as well as additional federal tax credits available in the current year and a favorable revaluation of the legacy South State deferred taxes due to an updated deferred tax rate resulting from the merger with CenterState.
Capital Resources
Our ongoing capital requirements have been met primarily through retained earnings, less the payment of cash dividends. As of September 30, 2020, shareholders’ equity was $4.6 billion, an increase of $2.2 billion, or 92.3%, from December 31, 2019, and an increase of $2.2 billion, or 94.1%, from $2.4 billion at September 30, 2019. The change from year-end was mainly attributable to the increase in equity through the issuance of common stock and the conversion of stock options and restricted stock totaling $2.3 billion from the merger with CSFL during the second quarter of 2020. The following table shows the changes in shareholders’ equity during 2020.
Total shareholders' equity at December 31, 2019
Cumulative adjustment pursuant to adoption of ASU 2016-13
Dividends paid on common shares ($1.41 per share)
Net increase in market value of securities available for sale, net of deferred taxes
Net decrease in market value of interest rate swap, net of deferred taxes
Equity based compensation
Stock repurchase pursuant to buyback plan (320,000 shares, average price of $ 77.29 per share)
Common stock repurchased - equity plans
Stock issued pursuant to acquisition of CSFL
Stock options and restricted stock acquired and converted pursuant to CSFL acquisition
Total shareholders' equity at September 30, 2020
In June 2019, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional 2,000,000 shares of our common stock after considering, among other things, our liquidity needs and capital resources as well as the estimated current value of our net assets (the “new Repurchase Program”). The number of shares to be purchased and the timing of the purchases are based on a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the level of cash balances, general business conditions, regulatory requirements, the market price of our common stock, and the availability of alternative investment opportunities. As of December 31, 2019, we had repurchased 1,165,000 shares at an average price of $74.72 a share (excluding sales commission) for a total of $87.1 million in common stock under the New Repurchase Program. During the first quarter of 2020, we remained active in repurchasing our common stock and bought 320,000 shares at an average price of $77.29 per share (excludes commission expense), a total of $24.7 million. No shares were repurchased during the second or third quarter of 2020. There were 515,000 shares available for repurchase remaining under the New Repurchase Program as of September 30, 2020.
Specifically, we are required to maintain the following minimum capital ratios:
●a CET1, risk-based capital ratio of 4.5%;
●a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6%;
●a total risk-based capital ratio of 8%; and
●a leverage ratio of 4%.
Under Basel III, Tier 1 capital includes two components: CET1 capital and additional Tier 1 capital. The highest form of capital, CET1 capital, consists solely of common stock (plus related surplus), retained earnings, accumulated other comprehensive income, otherwise referred to as AOCI, and limited amounts of minority interests that are in the form of common stock. Additional Tier 1 capital is primarily comprised of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, Tier 1 minority interests and grandfathered trust preferred securities (as discussed below). Tier 2 capital generally includes the allowance for loan losses up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, qualifying preferred stock, subordinated debt and qualifying tier 2 minority interests, less any deductions in Tier 2 instruments of an unconsolidated financial institution. Cumulative perpetual preferred stock is included only in Tier 2 capital, except that the Basel III rules permit bank holding companies with less than $15 billion in total consolidated assets to continue to include trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock issued before May 19, 2010 in Tier 1 Capital (but not in CET1 capital), subject to certain restrictions. With the merger with CSFL during the second quarter of 2020, the Company’s $115.0 million in trust preferred securities no longer qualifies for tier 1 capital and is now only included in tier 2 capital for regulatory capital calculations. AOCI is presumptively included in CET1 capital and often would operate to reduce this category of capital. When implemented, Basel III provided a one-time opportunity at the end of the first quarter of 2015 for covered banking organizations to opt out of much of this treatment of AOCI. We made this opt-out election and, as a result, retained our pre-existing treatment for AOCI.
In addition, in order to avoid restrictions on capital distributions or discretionary bonus payments to executives, under Basel III, a banking organization must maintain a “capital conservation buffer” on top of its minimum risk-based capital requirements. This buffer must consist solely of Tier 1 Common Equity, but the buffer applies to all three risk-based measurements (CET1, Tier 1 capital and total capital). The 2.5% capital conservation buffer became fully effective for us on January 1, 2019, resulting in the following effective minimum capital plus capital conservation buffer ratios: (i) a CET1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.5%.
On December 21, 2018, the federal banking agencies issued a joint final rule to revise their regulatory capital rules to (i) address the implementation of CECL; (ii) provide an optional three-year phase-in period for the day 1 adverse regulatory capital effects that banking organizations are expected to experience upon adopting CECL; and (iii) require the use of CECL in stress tests beginning with the 2020 capital planning and stress testing cycle for certain banking organizations that are subject to stress testing. CECL became effective for us on January 1, 2020 and the Company applied the provisions of the standard using the modified retrospective method as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. Related to the implementation of ASU 2016-13, we recorded additional allowance for credit losses for loans of $54.4 million, deferred tax assets of $12.6 million, an additional reserve for unfunded commitments of $6.4 million and an adjustment to retained earnings of $44.8 million. Instead of recognizing the effects from ASU 2016-13 at adoption, the standard included a transitional method option for recognizing the day 1 effects on the Company’s regulatory capital calculations over a three-year phase-in.
In March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the federal banking agencies issued an interim final rule for additional transitional relief to regulatory capital related to the impact of the adoption of CECL. The interim final rule provides banking organizations that adopt CECL in the 2020 calendar year with the option to delay for two years the estimated impact of CECL on regulatory capital, followed by the aforementioned three-year transition period to phase out the aggregate amount of benefit during the initial two-year delay for a total five-year transition. The estimated impact of CECL on regulatory capital (modified CECL transitional amount) is calculated as the sum of the day-one impact on retained earnings upon adoption of CECL (CECL transitional amount) and the calculated change in the ACL relative to the day-one ACL upon adoption of CECL multiplied by a scaling factor of 25%. The scaling factor is used to approximate the difference in the ACL under CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology. The modified CECL transitional amount will be calculated each quarter for the first two years of the five-year transition. The amount of the modified CECL transition amount will be fixed as of December 31, 2021, and that amount will be subject to the three-year phase out. The Company chose the five-year transition method and is deferring the recognition of the effects from day 1 and the CECL difference for the first two years of application.
The well-capitalized minimums and the Company’s and the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios for the following periods are reflected below:
Well-Capitalized
Minimums
South State Corporation:
Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital
N/A
Tier 1 risk-based capital
6.00
Total risk-based capital
Tier 1 leverage
SouthState Bank:
The tier 1 leverage ratio and the tier 1 risk-based capital ratio decreased compared to December 31, 2019 due mainly to the merger with CSFL. The percentage increase in the average assets for regulatory capital purposes for the tier 1 leverage ratio of 144.7% and the percentage increase in risk-based weighted assets for the tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 118.0% was greater than the percentage increase in Tier 1 risk-based capital of 104.3% at the holding company. The decline in the holding company ratios was greater than the decline at the bank due to the reduction in tier 1 risk-based capital related to the $115.0 in trust preferred debt no longer being able to be included as tier 1 capital based on the merger with CSFL along with the Company exceeding $15.0 billion in assets. The reduction in tier 1 risk based capital was also due to our repurchase of 320,000 shares of common stock at a cost of $24.7 million through our stock repurchase plans, the common stock dividend paid of $64.9 million, and a reduction in retained earnings of $44.8 million from a cumulative change in accounting principle from the adoption of ASU 2016-13. The total risk-based capital ratio increased compared to December 31, 2019 due to an increase in the allowance for credit losses that qualifies as tier 2 capital of $156.2 million and an increase in trust preferred debt and subordinated debt of $279.2 million that qualified for tier 2 capital at the holding company. The increase in the allowance was mainly due a provision for credit losses of $119.1 million recorded on the loan portfolio and unfunded commitments acquired in the merger with CSFL during the second quarter of 2020. The increase in debt that qualifies for tier 2 capital was due to the Company acquiring $238.0 million in subordinated debt and $38.5 million in trust preferred debt in the merger with CSFL. The increase in debt that qualifies for tier 2 capital did not affect the Bank’s total risk-based capital ratio because the debt is at the holding company level. Our capital ratios are currently well in excess of the minimum standards and continue to be in the “well capitalized” regulatory classification.
Liquidity
Liquidity refers to our ability to generate sufficient cash to meet our financial obligations, which arise primarily from the withdrawal of deposits, extension of credit and payment of operating expenses. Our Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) is charged with monitoring liquidity management policies, which are designed to ensure acceptable composition of asset/liability mix. Two critical areas of focus for ALCO are interest rate sensitivity and liquidity risk management. We have employed our funds in a manner to provide liquidity from both assets and liabilities sufficient to meet our cash needs.
Asset liquidity is maintained by the maturity structure of loans, investment securities and other short-term investments. Management has policies and procedures governing the length of time to maturity on loans and
investments. Normally, changes in the earning asset mix are of a longer-term nature and are not utilized for day-to-day corporate liquidity needs.
Our liabilities provide liquidity on a day-to-day basis. Daily liquidity needs are met from deposit levels or from our use of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings. We engage in routine activities to retain deposits intended to enhance our liquidity position. These routine activities include various measures, such as the following:
Our non-acquired loan portfolio increased by approximately $2.3 billion, or approximately 33.0% annualized, compared to the balance at December 31, 2019, and by $2.6 billion, or 29.2%, compared to the balance at September 30, 2019. Of the increased from both December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, $1.1 billion was related to PPP loans made in the first nine months of 2020. Excluding PPP loans, the non-acquired loan portfolio increased by $1.2 billion, or 17.6% from December 31, 2019 and by $1.5 billion, or 17.3% from September 30, 2019. The acquired loan portfolio increased by $11.6 billion from the balance at December 31, 2019 and by $11.3 billion from the balance at September 30, 2019. This increase was due the merger with CSFL in which the Company acquired $13.0 billion in loans in the second quarter of 2020. Excluding the acquired loans in the CSFL merger, the acquired loan portfolio decreased by $1.4 billion, or 64.6% from December 31, 2019 and by $1.6 billion, or 68.1% from September 30, 2019 through principal paydowns, charge-offs, foreclosures and renewals of acquired loans.
Our investment securities portfolio increased $1.7 billion compared to the balance at December 31, 2019, and increased by $1.9 billion compared to the balance at September 30, 2019. Of these increases in investment securities, $1.2 billion was acquired in the merger with CSFL during the second quarter of 2020. Excluding investment securities acquired in the CSFL merger, the investment portfolio increased by $548.0 million, or 27.3% from December 31, 2019 and by $691.0 million, or 37.1% from September 30, 2019. The increase in investment securities from December 31, 2019 was a result of investments acquired in the CSFL merger of $1.2 billion, purchases of $1.3 billion as well as improvements in the market value of the available for sale investment securities portfolio of $48.6 million. These increases were partially offset by maturities, calls, sales and paydowns of investment securities totaling $770.9 million. Net amortization of premiums were $13.3 million in the first nine months of 2020. The increase in investment securities excluding investments acquired in the CSFL merger was due to the Company making the strategic decision to increase the size of the portfolio with the excess funds from deposit growth and the increase in other borrowings. Total cash and cash equivalents were $4.5 billion at September 30, 2020 as compared to $688.7 million at December 31, 2019 and $719.2 million at September 30, 2019. The Company acquired $2.6 billion in cash and cash equivalents in the merger with CSFL in the second quarter of 2020. Total deposits increased $2.2 billion (excluding the $15.6 billion in deposits acquired in the CSFL merger) in the first nine of 2020 which improved liquidity.
At September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, we had $600.0 million, $0 and $1.3 million of traditional, out–of-market brokered deposits. We acquired $804.0 million in traditional, out-of-market brokered deposits in the merger with CSFL in the second quarter of 2020 of which $204.0 million paid out in the third quarter of 2020. At September 30, 2020, December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, we had $551.8 million, $45.8 million, and $49.2 million, respectively, of reciprocal brokered deposits. Of the total reciprocal brokered deposits at September 30, 2020, $458.3 million were acquired in the CSFL merger. Total deposits were $30.0 billion at September 30, 2020, an increase of $17.8 billion from $12.2 billion at December 31, 2019 and an increase of $17.9 billion from $12.0 billion at September 30, 2019. This increase was mainly due the merger with CSFL in which the Company acquired $15.6 billion in deposits in the second quarter of 2020. Excluding the acquired deposits in the CSFL merger, deposits increased by $2.2 billion, or 23.8% (annualized) from December 31, 2019 and by $2.3 billion, or 19.3% from September 30, 2019. Our legacy deposit growth since December 31, 2019 included an increase in demand deposit accounts of $1.2 billion, an increase in savings and money market accounts of $736.1 million and an increase in interest-bearing transaction accounts of $380.5 million partially offset by a decline in certificates of deposit of $4.2 million. Total other borrowings increased $273.7 million and $273.9 million, respectively, from December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019 to $1.1 billion at September 30, 2020. Total short-term borrowings at September 30, 2020 were $706.7 million consisting of $351.7 million in federal funds purchased and $355.0 million in securities sold under
agreements to repurchase. Total other borrowings at September 30, 2020 of $1.1 billion consists of $700.1 million in FHLB advances and $389.5 million in trust preferred and subordinated debt. Other borrowings increased approximately $273.7 million in 2020 through acquisition of trust preferred and subordinated debt in the CSFL merger during the second quarter of 2020. The Company borrowed $500 million in March 2019 and $200 million in June 2019 in 90-day fixed rate FHLB advances, which we currently plan to continuously renew. At the same time, we entered into interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $350 million (a four year agreement) and $350 million (a five year agreement) to manage the interest rate risk related to these 90-day FHLB advances. We borrowed these FHLB advances to provide liquidity for operations, loan growth and investment growth. In March 2020, we executed another FHLB advance of $300.0 million at a rate of 0.47% for nine months and FRB borrowings of $200.0 million at a rate of 0.25% for three months. These borrowings executed in March 2020 were to provide additional liquidity in reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic. These borrowings were paid off in the second quarter of 2020 as the Company had excess liquidity. To the extent that we employ other types of non-deposit funding sources, typically to accommodate retail and correspondent customers, we continue to take in shorter maturities of such funds. Our current approach may provide an opportunity to sustain a low funding rate or possibly lower our cost of funds but could also increase our cost of funds if interest rates rise.
Our ongoing philosophy is to remain in a liquid position, taking into account our current composition of earning assets, asset quality, capital position, and operating results. Our liquid earning assets include federal funds sold, balances at the Federal Reserve Bank, reverse repurchase agreements, and/or other short-term investments. Cyclical and other economic trends and conditions can disrupt our Bank’s desired liquidity position at any time. We expect that these conditions would generally be of a short-term nature. Under such circumstances, our Bank’s federal funds sold position and any balances at the Federal Reserve Bank serve as the primary sources of immediate liquidity. At September 30, 2020, our Bank had total federal funds credit lines of $776.0 million with no balance outstanding. If additional liquidity were needed, the Bank would turn to short-term borrowings as an alternative immediate funding source and would consider other appropriate actions such as promotions to increase core deposits or the sale of a portion of our investment portfolio. At September 30, 2020, our Bank had $1.2 billion of credit available at the Federal Reserve Bank’s Discount Window and had no balance outstanding. In addition, we could draw on additional alternative immediate funding sources from lines of credit extended to us from our correspondent banks and/or the FHLB. At September 30, 2020, our Bank had a total FHLB credit facility of $3.1 billion with total outstanding FHLB letters of credit consuming $482.2 million and $700.1 million in outstanding advances leaving $1.9 billion in availability on the FHLB credit facility. The Company has a $100.0 million unsecured line of credit with no outstanding advances. We believe that our liquidity position continues to be adequate and readily available.
Our contingency funding plans incorporate several potential stages based on liquidity levels. Also, we review on at least an annual basis our liquidity position and our contingency funding plans with our principal banking regulator. We maintain various wholesale sources of funding. If our deposit retention efforts were to be unsuccessful, we would utilize these alternative sources of funding. Under such circumstances, depending on the external source of funds, our interest cost would vary based on the range of interest rates we are charged. This could increase our cost of funds, impacting net interest margins and net interest spreads.
Deposit and Loan Concentrations
We have no material concentration of deposits from any single customer or group of customers. We have no significant portion of our loans concentrated within a single industry or group of related industries. Furthermore, we attempt to avoid making loans that, in an aggregate amount, exceed 10% of total loans to a multiple number of borrowers engaged in similar business activities. As of September 30, 2020, there were no aggregated loan concentrations of this type. We do not believe there are any material seasonal factors that would have a material adverse effect on us. We do not have any foreign loans or deposits.
Concentration of Credit Risk
We consider concentrations of credit to exist when, pursuant to regulatory guidelines, the amounts loaned to a multiple number of borrowers engaged in similar business activities which would cause them to be similarly impacted by general economic conditions represents 25% of total Tier 1 capital plus regulatory adjusted allowance for loan losses of the Company, or $820.4 million at September 30, 2020. Based on this criteria, we had six such credit concentrations at September 30, 2020, including loans on hotels and motels of $959.4 million, loans to lessors of nonresidential buildings (except mini-warehouses) of $3.8 billion, loans secured by owner occupied office buildings of $966.3 million, loans
90
secured by owner occupied nonresidential buildings (excluding office buildings) of $2.0 billion, loans to lessors of residential buildings (investment properties and multi-family) of $1.0 billion and loans secured by 1st mortgage 1-4 family owner occupied residential property of $3.8 billion. The risk for these loans and for all loans is managed collectively through the use of credit underwriting practices developed and updated over time. The loss estimate for these loans is determined using our standard ACL methodology.
With some financial institutions adopting CECL in the first quarter of 2020, banking regulators established new guidelines for calculating credit concentrations. Banking regulators set the guidelines for construction, land development and other land loans to total less than 100% of total Tier 1 capital less modified CECL transitional amount plus ACL (CDL concentration ratio) and for total commercial real estate loans (construction, land development and other land loans along with other non-owner occupied commercial real estate and multifamily loans) to total less than 300% of total Tier 1 capital less modified CECL transitional amount plus ACL (CRE concentration ratio). Both ratios are calculated by dividing certain types of loan balances for each of the two categories by the Bank’s total Tier 1 capital less modified CECL transitional amount plus ACL. At September 30, 2020, the Bank’s CDL concentration ratio was 54.1% and its CRE concentration ratio was 236.2%. As of September 30, 2020, the Bank was below the established regulatory guidelines. When a bank’s ratios are in excess of one or both of these loan concentration ratios guidelines, banking regulators generally require an increased level of monitoring in these lending areas by bank Management. Therefore, we monitor these two ratios as part of our concentration management processes.
Previous to the adoption of the new guidelines established in 2020, the guidelines for the construction, land development and other land loans were to total less than 100% of total risk-based capital and for total commercial real estate loans to total less than 300% of total risk-based capital. Both ratios were calculated by dividing certain types of loan balances for each of the two categories by the Bank’s total risk-based capital. At December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019 the Bank’s construction, land development and other land loans as a percentage of total risk-based capital were 68.7% and 70.4%, respectively. Commercial real estate loans (which includes construction, land development and other land loans along with other non-owner occupied commercial real estate and multifamily loans) as a percentage of total risk-based capital were 225.6% and 233.4% as of December 31, 2019 and September 30, 2019, respectively.
Cautionary Note Regarding Any Forward-Looking Statements
Statements included in this report, which are not historical in nature are intended to be, and are hereby identified as, forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor provided by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward looking statements are based on, among other things, Management’s beliefs, assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections about the financial services industry, the economy, South State and the merger with CSFL. Words and phrases such as “may,” “approximately,” “continue,” “should,” “expects,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “is likely,” “look ahead,” “look forward,” “believes,” “will,” “intends,” “estimates,” “strategy,” “plan,” “could,” “potential,” “possible” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. We caution readers that forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict with regard to, among other things, timing, extent, likelihood and degree of occurrence, which could cause actual results to differ materially from anticipated results. Such risks, uncertainties and assumptions, include, among others, the following:
For any forward-looking statements made in this report or in any documents incorporated by reference into this Report, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward looking statements contained in the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and are based on information available at that time. We do not undertake any obligation to update or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by federal securities laws. As forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties, caution should be exercised against placing undue reliance on such statements. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements by us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this Report.
Additional information with respect to factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by our forward-looking statements may also be included in other reports that we file with the SEC. We caution that the foregoing list of risk factors is not exclusive and not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk as of September 30, 2020 from those disclosures presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation under the COSO criteria, which excluded the operations of CSFL as noted below, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding our control objective that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In conducting the evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2020, the Company excluded the operations of CSFL and its subsidiaries as permitted by the guidance issued by the Office of the Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission (not to extend more than one year beyond the date of the acquisition or for more than one annual reporting period). In conducting the evaluation of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2020, the Company excluded those disclosure controls and procedures of CSFL that are subsumed by internal control over financial reporting. The Merger was completed on June 7, 2020. On acquisition date, CSFL’s assets represented approximately 50 percent of the Company’s consolidated assets. See "Note 4. Business Combinations" for further discussion of the Merger and its impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The design of any system of controls and procedures is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the second quarter of 2020, CSFL merged into South State Corporation. The Company is working to integrate CSFL into its overall internal control over financial reporting processes. Except for changes made in connection with this integration of CSFL, there was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the third quarter of 2020 that has materially affected, or is likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As of September 30, 2020 and the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we believe that we are not party to, nor is any or our property the subject of, any pending material legal proceeding other than those that may occur in the ordinary course of our business.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
Investing in shares of our common stock involves certain risks, including those identified and described in Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, as well as cautionary statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including those under the caption “Cautionary Note Regarding Any Forward-Looking Statements” set forth in Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, risks and matters described elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the SEC.
The Company is providing these additional risk factors to supplement the risk factors contained in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected our business, financial condition and results of operations, and the ultimate impacts of the pandemic on our business, financial condition and results of operations will depend on future developments and other factors that are highly uncertain and will be impacted by the scope and duration of the pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities in response to the pandemic.
The ongoing COVID-19 global and national health emergency has caused significant disruption in the international and United States economies and financial markets and has had an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The spread of COVID-19 has caused illness, quarantines, cancellation of events and travel, business and school shutdowns, reduction in business activity and financial transactions, supply chain interruptions and overall economic and financial market instability. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the governments of the states in which we have financial centers and of most other states have taken preventative or protective actions, such as imposing restrictions on travel and business operations, advising or requiring individuals to limit or forego their time outside of their homes, and ordering temporary closures of businesses that have been deemed to be non-essential. These restrictions and other consequences of the pandemic have resulted in significant adverse effects for many different types of businesses, including, among others, those in the travel, hospitality and food and beverage industries, and have resulted in a significant number of layoffs and furloughs of employees nationwide and in the regions in which we operate.
The ultimate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the broader economy and the markets that we serve are not known, nor is the ultimate length of the restrictions described above and the extent of any accompanying effects. Moreover, the Federal Reserve has taken action to lower the Federal Funds rate, which may negatively affect our interest income and, therefore, earnings, financial condition and results of operation. Additional impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business could be widespread and material, and may include, or exacerbate, among other consequences, the following:
These factors, together or in combination with other events or occurrences that may not yet be known or anticipated, may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in meaningfully lower stock prices for many companies, including our own, as well as the trading prices for many other securities. The further spread of the COVID-19 outbreak, as well as ongoing or new governmental, regulatory and private sector responses to the pandemic, may materially disrupt banking and other economic activity generally and in the areas in which we operate. This could result in further decline in demand for our banking products and services, and could negatively impact, among other things, our liquidity, regulatory capital, goodwill and our growth strategy. Any one or more of these developments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are taking precautions to protect the safety and well-being of our employees and customers. However, no assurance can be given that the steps being taken will be adequate or deemed to be appropriate, nor can we predict the level of disruption which will occur to our employee’s ability to provide customer support and service. If we are unable to recover from a business disruption on a timely basis, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. We may also incur additional costs to remedy damages caused by such disruptions, which could further adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a higher allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) determined in accordance with the Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL standard, and may result in increased volatility and further increases in our allowance for loan losses.
The measure of our ACL is dependent on the adoption and interpretation of applicable accounting standards. The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a new credit impairment model, the Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL standard, which has become effective and was adopted by us in the first quarter of 2020. Under the CECL model, we are required to present certain financial assets carried at amortized cost, such as loans held for investment and held-to-maturity debt securities, at the net amount expected to be collected. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount and certain Management judgments over the life of the loan. This initial measurement took place as of January 1, 2020 at the time of our adoption of CECL, and measurements will occur periodically thereafter. The adoption of the CECL model has materially affected how we determine our ACL and, combined with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, required us to significantly increase our allowance.
The CECL model may create more volatility in the level of our ACL, as compared to the “incurred loss” standard that we previously applied in determining our ACL. The CECL model requires us to estimate the lifetime “expected credit loss” with respect to loans and other applicable financial assets, which may change more rapidly than the level of “incurred losses” that would have been used to determine our allowance for loan losses under the prior incurred loss standard. The potentially material effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on lifetime expected credit loss, and the challenges associated with estimating lifetime credit losses in view of the uncertain ultimate impacts of the pandemic, may result in increased volatility and significant additions to our ACL in the future, which could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
95
As a participating lender in the SBA Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), the Company and the Bank are subject to additional risks of litigation from the Bank’s customers or other parties regarding the Bank’s processing of loans for the PPP and risks that the SBA may not fund some or all PPP loan guaranties.
The CARES Act included a $349 billion loan program administered through the SBA referred to as the PPP. On or about April 16, 2020, the SBA notified lenders that the $349 billion earmarked for the PPP was exhausted. Congress approved additional funding for the PPP of approximately $320 billion on April 24, 2020. This program has now expired. Under the PPP, small businesses and other entities and individuals can apply for loans from existing SBA lenders and other approved regulated lenders that enroll in the program, subject to numerous limitations and eligibility criteria. The Bank is participating as a lender in the PPP. The PPP opened on April 3, 2020; however, because of the short timeframe between the passing of the CARES Act and the opening of the PPP, there was some ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP, which exposes the Company to risks relating to noncompliance with the PPP. As of September 30, 2020, we have originated approximately 20,000 loans, totaling approximately $2.4 billion though the PPP program. Since the opening of the PPP, several other larger banks have been subject to litigation regarding the process and procedures that such banks used in processing applications for the PPP. Two lawsuits were filed against the Company and the Bank, along with other larger and smaller banks, relating to the payment of agent fees in connection with the origination of PPP loans, but those lawsuits have been dismissed as against the Company and the Bank. The Company and the Bank may be exposed to the risk of additional litigation, from both customers and non-customers that approached the Bank regarding PPP loans, regarding its process and procedures used in processing applications for the PPP. If any such litigation is filed against the Company or the Bank and is not resolved in a manner favorable to the Company or the Bank, it may result in significant financial liability or adversely affect the Company’s reputation. In addition, litigation can be costly, regardless of outcome. Any financial liability, litigation costs or reputational damage caused by PPP related litigation could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Paycheck Protection Program loans are fixed, low interest rate loans that are guaranteed by the SBA and subject
to numerous other regulatory requirements, and a borrower may apply to have all or a portion of the loan forgiven. If Paycheck Protection Program borrowers fail to qualify for loan forgiveness, the Bank faces a heightened risk of holding these loans at unfavorable interest rates for an extended period of time. While the Paycheck Protection Program loans are
guaranteed by the SBA, various regulatory requirements will apply to the Bank’s ability to seek recourse under the
guarantees, and related procedures are currently subject to uncertainty.
The Bank also has credit risk on PPP loans if a determination is made by the SBA that there is a deficiency in the manner in which the loan was originated, funded, or serviced by the Bank, such as an issue with the eligibility of a borrower to receive a PPP loan, which may or may not be related to the ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP. Such deficiency also may be found in the event the Bank discovers any evidence of fraud relating to a PPP loan. In the event of a loss resulting from a default on a PPP loan and a determination by the SBA that there was a deficiency in the manner in which the PPP loan was originated, funded, or serviced by the Company, the SBA may deny its liability under the guaranty, reduce the amount of the guaranty, or, if it has already paid under the guaranty, seek recovery of any loss related to the deficiency from the Company.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
In January 2019, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program allowing us to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock, which replaced and superseded our prior share repurchase program. In June 2019, our Board of Directors announced the authorization for the repurchase of up to an additional 2,000,000 shares of our common stock (the “New Repurchase Program”), which began once all shares were repurchased under the previous Repurchase Program. As of September 30, 2020, we have repurchased 1,485,000 shares of the 2,000,000 shares
authorized for repurchase under the New Repurchase Program and may repurchase up to an additional 515,000 shares of common stock under the New Repurchase Program.
The following table reflects share repurchase activity during the third quarter of 2020:
(d) Maximum
(c) Total
Number (or
Number of
Approximate
Shares (or
Dollar Value) of
Units)
(a) Total
Purchased as
Units) that May
Part of Publicly
Yet Be
(b) Average
Announced
Purchased
Price Paid per
Plans or
Under the Plans
Period
Share (or Unit)
Programs
or Programs
July 1 - July 31
1,718
*
46.91
515,000
August 1 - August 31
1,932
53.89
September 1 - September 30
47.54
3,809
For the months ended July 31, 2020, August 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020, all shares repurchased this quarter were under arrangements, authorized by our stock-based compensation plans and Board of Directors, whereby officers or directors may sell previously owned shares to the Company in order to pay for the exercises of stock options or for income taxes owed on vesting shares of restricted stock. These shares were not purchased under the 2004 or 2019 stock repurchase programs to repurchase shares.
Item 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Item 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Date of Annual Shareholders’ Meeting
Under Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, any proposal that a shareholder may intend to present at the 2021 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting (the “2021 Annual Meeting”) must be received in writing by the Secretary of the Company at its principal executive office located at 1101 First Street South, Winter Haven, Florida 33880, no later than 120 calendar days before the first anniversary of the August 14, 2020 release date of the proxy statement for the 2020 annual shareholders’ meeting (the “2020 Annual Meeting”); provided, that if the date of our 2021 Annual Meeting has been changed by more than 30 days before the one year anniversary of the 2020 Annual Meeting, or September 30, 2021, we must receive the proposal within a reasonable time before we begin to print and send the proxy materials. We currently anticipate that we will hold our 2021 Annual Meeting on April 28, 2021, which will be more than 30 calendar days before the anniversary date of our 2020 Annual Meeting. As a result, we must receive any such proposal no later than the close of business on December 29, 2020, which we consider a reasonable time period before we begin to print and send proxy materials. Any such proposal must comply with the procedural, informational and other requirements outlined in our Bylaws. If the proposal complies with all of the requirements of Rule 14a-8, the proposal will be considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy statement relating to such meeting.
Under our Bylaws, shareholder proposals intended to be raised at the 2021 Annual Meeting outside of Rule 14a-8, including nominations for election of director(s) , must be received in writing by the Secretary of the Company, at 1101 First Street South, Winter Haven, Florida 33880, no earlier than 120 days and no later than 90 days prior to the one year anniversary of our 2020 Annual Meeting, unless the date of our 2021 Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before September 30, 2021. Given that we anticipate holding the 2021 Annual Meeting on April 28, 2021, we must receive any such proposal no later than the close of business on January 28, 2021 but no earlier than December 29, 2020, and any such proposal must comply with the procedural, informational and other requirements outlined in our Bylaws. The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by shareholders, provided the nomination and notification contains the nominee’s name, address, principal occupation, total number of shares owned, consent to serve as a director, and all information relating to the nominee and the nominating shareholder as would be required to be disclosed in the solicitation of proxies for the election of such nominee as a director pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proxy rules. The Governance and Nominating Committee does not intend to alter the manner in which it evaluates candidates, including the minimum criteria set forth above, based on whether the candidate was recommended by a shareholder or not.
Item 6. EXHIBITS
The exhibits required to be filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are listed in the Exhibit Index attached hereto and are incorporated by reference.
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No.
Description
Exhibit 31.1
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32
Section 1350 Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 101
The following financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South State Corporation for the quarter ended March, 31, 2020, formatted in iXBRL (Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (v) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (vi) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Exhibit 104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (the cover page XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant)
Date: November 6, 2020
/s/ John C. Corbett
John C. Corbett
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ William E. Matthews, V
William E. Matthews, V
Senior Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ Sara G. Arana
Sara G. Arana
Senior Vice President and
Principal Accounting Officer