UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2019
OR
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 1-35730
STELLUS CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
4400 Post Oak Parkway, Suite 2200Houston, Texas 77027
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(713) 292-5400
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes xNo ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of the issuer’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding as of May 8, 2019 was 18,905,960
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)
Stellus Capital Investment Corporation Consolidated Schedule of Investments (unaudited)
March 31, 2019
Headquarters/
Industry
Fair
Value(1)
The investment is not a qualifying asset under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The Company may not acquire any non-qualifying assets unless, at the time of the acquisition, qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the Company’s total assets. Qualifying
assets represent approximately 88% of the Company’s total assets as of March 31, 2019.
Abbreviation LegendPIK — Payment-In-KindL — LIBOREuro — Euro Dollar
Stellus Capital Investment Corporation Consolidated Schedule of Investments
December 31, 2018
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements.
Stellus Capital Investment Corporation Consolidated Schedule of Investments – (continued)
STELLUS CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSMarch 31, 2019(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 — NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations
Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (“we”, “us”, “our” and the “Company”) was formed as a Maryland corporation on May 18, 2012 (“Inception”) and is an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified investment management company. The Company is applying the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 946, Financial Services Investment Companies. The Company has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), and treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The Company’s investment activities are managed by our investment adviser, Stellus Capital Management, LLC (“Stellus Capital” or the “Advisor”).
As of March 31, 2019, the Company had issued a total of 18,703,810 shares and raised $275,426,915 in gross proceeds since Inception, incurring $8,704,427 in offering expenses and sales load fees for net proceeds from offerings of $266,722,489. The Company’s shares are currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol ‘‘SCM’’. See Note 4 for further details.
The Company has established wholly owned subsidiaries: SCIC — Consolidated Blocker 1, Inc., SCIC – ICD Blocker 1, Inc., SCIC — CC Blocker 1, Inc., SCIC — ERC Blocker 1, Inc., SCIC — SKP Blocker 1, Inc. and SCIC — APE Blocker 1, Inc. and SCIC — Hollander Blocker 1, Inc., which are structured as Delaware entities, to hold equity or equity-like investments in portfolio companies organized as limited liability companies, or LLCs (or other forms of pass-through entities) (collectively, the “Taxable Subsidiaries”). The Taxable Subsidiaries are consolidated for U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) reporting purposes, and the portfolio investments held by them are included in the consolidated financial statements.
On June 14, 2013, we formed Stellus Capital SBIC, LP (the “SBIC subsidiary”), a Delaware limited partnership, and its general partner, Stellus Capital SBIC GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company. On June 20, 2014, the SBIC subsidiary received a license from the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) to operate as a Small Business Investment Company (“SBIC”) under Section 301(c) of the Small Business Investment Company Act of 1958, as amended. The SBIC subsidiary and its general partner are consolidated for U.S. GAAP reporting purposes, and the portfolio investments held by it are included in the consolidated financial statements.
The SBIC license allows the SBIC subsidiary to obtain leverage by issuing SBA-guaranteed debentures, subject to the issuance of a capital commitment by the SBA and other customary procedures. SBA-guaranteed debentures are non-recourse, interest only debentures with interest payable semi-annually and have a ten year maturity. The principal amount of SBA-guaranteed debentures is not required to be paid prior to maturity but may be prepaid at any time without penalty. The interest rate of SBA-guaranteed debentures is fixed on a semi-annual basis at a market-driven spread over U.S. Treasury Notes with 10-year maturities. The SBA, as a creditor, will have a superior claim to the SBIC subsidiary’s assets over the Company’s stockholders in the event the Company liquidates the SBIC subsidiary or the SBA exercises its remedies under the SBA-guaranteed debentures issued by the SBIC subsidiary upon an event of default. SBA regulations currently limit the amount that a single licensee may borrow to a maximum of $150,000,000 when it has at least $75,000,000 in regulatory capital, as such term is defined by the SBA, receives a capital commitment from the SBA and has been through an examination by the SBA subsequent to licensing. As of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the SBIC subsidiary had $75,000,000 in regulatory capital. As of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the SBIC subsidiary had $150,000,000 of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding. See footnote 2 of the Consolidated Schedule of Investments for additional information regarding the treatment of SBIC investments with respect to the Credit Facility.
As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. Prior to June 28, 2018, we were only allowed to employ leverage to the extent that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, was equal to at least 200% after giving effect to such leverage. On March 23, 2018, the Small Business Credit Availability Act (the ‘‘SBCAA’’) was signed into law, which included various changes to regulations under the federal securities laws that impact BDCs. The SBCAA included changes to the 1940 Act to allow BDCs to decrease their asset coverage requirement to 150% from 200% under certain circumstances.
On April 4, 2018, the Company’s board of directors (the ‘‘Board’’), including a ‘‘required majority’’ (as such term is defined in Section 57(o) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ‘‘1940 Act’’)) of the Board, approved the application of the modified asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act. The Board also approved the submission of a proposal to stockholders to approve the application of the modified asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act, which was approved by stockholders at the Company’s 2018 annual meeting of stockholders. As a result, the asset coverage ratio test applicable to the Company was decreased from 200% to 150%, effective June 28, 2018. The amount of leverage that we employ at any time depends on our assessment of the market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. As of March 31, 2019, our asset coverage ratio was 314%.
The Company’s investment objective is to maximize the total return to its stockholders in the form of current income and capital appreciation through debt and related equity investments in middle-market companies. The Company seeks to achieve its investment objective by originating and investing primarily in private U.S. middle-market companies (typically those with $5.0 million to $50.0 million of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)) through first lien, second lien, unitranche and mezzanine debt financing, with corresponding equity co-investments. It sources investments primarily through the extensive network of relationships that the principals of Stellus Capital have developed with financial sponsor firms, financial institutions, middle-market companies, management teams and other professional intermediaries.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in conformity with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP are omitted. The unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries.
In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated financial results included herein contain all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements for the interim periods included herein. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full year. Also, the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2018.
In accordance with Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Company does not consolidate portfolio company investments.
The accounting records of the Company are maintained in U.S. dollars.
Portfolio Investment Classification
The Company classifies its portfolio investments in accordance with the requirements of the 1940 Act as follows: (a) “Control Investments” are defined as investments in which the Company owns more than 25% of the voting securities or has rights to maintain greater than 50% of the board representation, (b) “Affiliate Investments” are defined as investments in which the Company owns between 5% and 25% of the voting securities and does not have rights to maintain greater than 50% of the board representation, and (c) “Non-controlled, non-affiliate investments” are defined as investments that are neither Control Investments or Affiliate Investments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
At March 31, 2019, cash balances totaling $60,759 did not exceed FDIC insurance protection levels of $250,000. In addition, at March 31, 2019, the Company held $23,782,887 in cash equivalents, which are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. All of the Company’s cash deposits are held at large established high credit quality financial institutions and management believes that risk of loss associated with any uninsured balances is remote.
Cash consists of bank demand deposits. We deem certain U.S. Treasury Bills and other high-quality, short-term debt securities as cash equivalents.
Fair Value Measurements
We account for substantially all of our financial instruments at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 820 — Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (‘‘ASC Topic 820’’). ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework used to measure fair value, and requires disclosures for fair value measurements, including the categorization of financial instruments into a three-level hierarchy based on the transparency of valuation inputs. ASC Topic 820 requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate such value. We believe that the carrying amounts of our financial instruments such as cash, receivables and payables approximate the fair value of these items due to the short maturity of these instruments. This is considered a Level 1 valuation technique. The carrying values of our Credit Facility and SBA-guaranteed debentures approximate fair value because the interest rates adjusts to the market interest rates (Level 3 input). The carrying value of our 2022 Notes (as defined in Note 11) is based on the closing price of the security (Level 2 input). See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion regarding the fair value measurements and hierarchy.
Consolidation
As permitted under Regulation S-X under the Exchange Act and ASC Topic 946, we generally do not consolidate our investment in a portfolio company other than an investment company subsidiary. We consolidated the results of the SBIC subsidiary and the Taxable Subsidiaries. All intercompany balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated statements of assets and liabilities in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Changes in the economic environment, financial markets and any other parameters used in determining these estimates could cause actual results to differ materially.
Deferred Financing Costs
Deferred financing costs, prepaid loan fees on SBA-guaranteed debentures and prepaid loan structure fees consist of fees and expenses paid in connection with the closing of our Credit Facility, notes and SBA-guaranteed debentures and are capitalized at the time of payment. These costs are amortized using the straight line method over the term of the respective instrument and presented as an offset to the corresponding debt on the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Offering Costs
Deferred offering costs consist of fees and expenses incurred in connection with the offer and sale of the Company’s common stock, including legal, accounting, printing fees and other related expenses, as well as costs incurred in connection with the filing of a shelf registration statement. These costs are capitalized when incurred and recognized as a reduction of offering proceeds when the offering is consummated and shown on the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets and Liabilities as a reduction to Paid-in-Capital. During the quarter ended March 31, 2019, we recognized $202,891 of offering costs related to a secondary offering that occurred in March 2019. At March 31, 2019 $7,609 remained as deferred offering costs related to an offering that has not yet occurred. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the company incurred $18,673 of costs related to the preparation of a registration statement, which were capitalized as the offering had not yet occurred. See Note 4 and Note 12 for further discussion.
Investments
As a BDC, the Company will generally invest in illiquid loans and securities including debt and equity securities of private middle-market companies. Under procedures established by our board of directors, the Company intends to value investments for which market quotations are readily available at such market quotations. The Company will obtain these market values from an independent pricing service or at the median between the bid and ask prices obtained from at least two brokers or dealers (if available, otherwise by a principal market maker or a primary market dealer). Debt and equity securities that are not publicly traded or whose market prices are not readily available will be valued at fair value as determined in good faith by our board of directors. Such determination of fair values may involve subjective judgments and estimates. The Company also engages independent valuation providers to review the valuation of each portfolio investment that does not have a readily available market quotation at least twice annually.
Investments purchased within approximately 90 days of the valuation date will be valued at cost plus accreted discount, or minus amortized premium, which approximates fair value. With respect to unquoted securities, our board of directors, together with our independent valuation advisors, will value each investment considering, among other measures, discounted cash flow models, comparisons of financial ratios of peer companies that are public and other factors. When an external event such as a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent equity sale occurs, the board of directors will use the pricing indicated by the external event to corroborate and/or assist us in our valuation. Because the Company expects that there will not be a readily available market for many of the investments in our portfolio, the Company expects to value most of our portfolio investments at fair value as determined in good faith by the board of directors using a documented valuation policy and a consistently applied valuation process. Due to the inherent uncertainty of determining the fair value of investments that do not have a readily available market value, the fair value of our investments may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had a readily available market value existed for such investments, and the differences could be material.
In following these approaches, the types of factors that will be taken into account in fair value pricing investments will include, as relevant, but not be limited to:
available current market data, including relevant and applicable market trading and transaction
comparables;
the portfolio company’s ability to make payments, its earnings and discounted cash flows and the
markets in which it does business;
Revenue Recognition
We record interest income on an accrual basis to the extent such interest is deemed collectible. We record interest income on an accrual basis to the extent such interest is deemed collectible. Payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest, represents contractual interest accrued and added to the loan balance that generally becomes due at maturity. Loan origination fees, original issue discount and market discount or premium are capitalized, and we then accrete or amortize such amounts using the effective interest method as interest income. Upon the prepayment of a loan or debt security, any unamortized loan origination fee is recorded as interest income. We record prepayment premiums on loans and debt securities as other income. Dividend income, if any, will be recognized on the ex-dividend date.
A presentation of the interest income we have received from portfolio companies for the quarters ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows:
To maintain our treatment as a RIC, substantially all of this income must be paid to stockholders in the form of distributions, even if we have not collected any cash.
We will not accrue interest on loans and debt securities if we have reason to doubt our ability to collect such interest. Management considers portfolio specific circumstances as well as other economic factors in determining collectability. As of March 31, 2019, we had three loans on non-accrual status, which represented approximately 2.7% of our loan portfolio at cost and 1.7% at fair value. As of December 31, 2018, we had four loans on non-accrual status, which represented approximately 3.9% of our loan portfolio at cost and 2.8% at fair value. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, approximately $1,866,828 and $1,856,272 of income from investments on non-accrual has not been accrued. If a loan or debt security’s status significantly improves regarding the debtor’s ability to service the debt or other obligations, or if a loan or debt security is sold or written off, we remove it from non-accrual status.
Net Realized Gains or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation
We measure realized gains or losses by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment, sale or disposition and the amortized cost basis of the investment, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized. Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflects the change in portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including any reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation, when gains or losses are realized.
Investment Transaction Costs
Costs that are material associated with an investment transaction, including legal expenses, are included in the cost basis of purchases and deducted from the proceeds of sales unless such costs are reimbursed by the borrower.
Receivables and Payables for Unsettled Securities Transaction
The Company records all investments on a trade date basis.
U.S. Federal Income Taxes
The Company has elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code, and to operate in a manner so as to qualify annually for the tax treatment applicable to RICs. To qualify for tax treatment as a RIC, among other things, the Company is required to timely distribute to its stockholders at least 90% of investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code, for each year. So long as the Company maintains its status as a RIC, it generally will not pay corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that it distributes at least annually to its stockholders as dividends. Rather, any tax liability related to income earned by the Company represents obligations of the Company’s investors and will not be reflected in the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
To avoid a 4% U.S federal excise tax on undistributed earnings, the Company is required to distribute each calendar year the sum of (i) 98% of its ordinary income for such calendar year (ii) 98.2% of its net capital gains for the one-year period ending December 31 (iii) any income recognized, but not distributed, in preceding years and on which the Company paid no federal income tax or the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement. For this purpose, however, any net ordinary income or capital gain net income retained by us that is subject to corporate income tax for the tax year ending in that calendar year will be considered to have been distributed by year end (or earlier if estimated taxes are paid). The Company, at its discretion, may choose not to distribute all of its taxable income for the calendar year and pay a non-deductible 4% excise tax on this income. If the Company chooses to do so, all other things being equal, this would increase expenses and reduce the amount available to be distributed to stockholders. To the extent that the Company determines that its estimated current year annual taxable income will be in excess of estimated current year dividend distributions from such taxable income, the Company accrues excise taxes on estimated excess taxable income as taxable income is earned.
Income tax expense of $12,744 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 is related to state and excise taxes. Included in other general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018 is a refund of $37,648 related to excise taxes.
The Company evaluates tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing its tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions deemed to meet a “more-likely-than-not” threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or expense in the applicable period.
As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had not recorded a liability for any unrecognized tax positions. Management’s evaluation of uncertain tax positions may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based upon factors including, but not limited to, an on-going analysis of tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. The Company’s policy is to include interest and penalties related to income taxes, if applicable, in general and administrative expenses. Any expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 were de minimis.
The Taxable Subsidiaries are direct wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company that have elected to be taxable entities. The Taxable Subsidiaries permit the Company to hold equity investments in portfolio companies which are “pass through” entities for tax purposes and continue to comply with the “source-of-income” requirements contained in RIC tax provisions of the Code. The Taxable Subsidiaries are not consolidated with the Company for income tax purposes and may generate income tax expense, benefit, and the related tax assets and liabilities, as a result of their ownership of certain portfolio investments. The income tax expense, or benefit, if any, and related tax assets and liabilities are reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The Taxable Subsidiaries use the liability method in accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements, using statutory tax rates in effect for the year in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided against deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses. Taxable income generally excludes net unrealized appreciation or depreciation, as investment gains or losses are not included in taxable income until they are realized.
For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded deferred income tax provision of $12,601 and $0, respectively, related to the Taxable Subsidiaries. In addition, as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had a deferred tax liability of $80,554 and $67,953, respectively.
Earnings per Share
Basic per share calculations are computed utilizing the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. The Company has no common stock equivalents. As a result, there is no difference between diluted earnings per share and basic per share amounts.
Paid In Capital
The Company records the proceeds from the sale of its common stock on a net basis to (i) capital stock and (ii) paid in capital in excess of par value, excluding all commissions and marketing support fees.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13 — Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 is part of the disclosure framework project, which primarily focuses on improving the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements. The amendments in this update remove, modify, and add certain disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement. The update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 31, 2019, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the guidance, however it does not expect any impact of this new guidance on its consolidated financial statements to be material.
Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Disclosure Update and Simplification
In August 2018, the SEC adopted the final rule under SEC Release No. 33-10532 (the “Rule”), Disclosure Update and Simplification, amending certain disclosure requirements that were redundant, outdated or superseded. The Rule is intended to facilitate the disclosure of information to investors and simplify compliance. The Company has adopted the Rule. The Rule included amendments to Regulation S-X (the “Amendments”), including revisions to Rule 6-04.17 under Regulation S-X to remove the requirement to separately state the book basis components of net assets on the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities: undistributed (over distribution of) net investment income, accumulated undistributed net realized gains (losses), and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation). Instead, consistent with U.S. GAAP, funds are required to disclose total distributable earnings. Additionally, the Amendments remove the requirement to separately state the source of distributions paid and the requirement to parenthetically state the book basis amount of undistributed (over distribution of) net investment income on the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets. The Company’s Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities and Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets for the current and comparative reporting periods have been modified to conform to the rule.
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB or other standards setting bodies that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. We believe the impact of the recently issued standards and any that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
NOTE 2 — RELATED PARTY ARRANGEMENTS
Investment Advisory Agreement
The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement with Stellus Capital pursuant to which Stellus Capital serves as its investment adviser. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company has agreed to pay to Stellus Capital an annual base management fee of 1.75% of gross assets, including assets purchased with borrowed funds or other forms of leverage and excluding cash and cash equivalents, and an incentive fee.
For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded an expense for base management fees of $2,222,645 and $1,748,896, respectively. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $972,645 and $2,183,975, respectively, were payable to Stellus Capital.
The incentive fee has two components, investment income and capital gains, as follows:
Investment Income Incentive Fee
The investment income component (“Investment Income Incentive Fee”) is calculated, and payable to the Advisor, quarterly in arrears based on the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter, subject to a cumulative total return requirement and to deferral of non-cash amounts. The pre-incentive fee net investment income, which is expressed as a rate of return on the value of the Company’s net assets attributable to the Company’s common stock, for the immediately preceding calendar quarter, will have a 2.0% (which is 8.0% annualized) hurdle rate (also referred to as the “Hurdle”). Pre-incentive fee net investment income means interest income, dividend income and any other income accrued during the calendar quarter, minus the Company’s operating expenses for the quarter excluding the incentive fee. Pre-incentive fee net investment income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. The Advisor receives no incentive fee for any calendar quarter in which the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income does not exceed the Hurdle. Subject to the cumulative total return requirement described below, the Advisor receives 100% of the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income for any calendar quarter with respect to that portion of the pre-incentive net investment income for such quarter, if any, that exceeds the Hurdle but is less than 2.5% (which is 10.0% annualized) of net assets (also referred to as the “Catch-up”) and 20.0% of the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income for such calendar quarter, if any, greater than 2.5% (10.0% annualized) of net assets.
The foregoing incentive fee is subject to a total return requirement, which provides that no incentive fee in respect of the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income is payable except to the extent 20.0% of the cumulative net increase in net assets resulting from operations over the then current and 11 preceding calendar quarters exceeds the cumulative incentive fees accrued and/or paid for the 11 preceding quarters. In other words, any Investment Income Incentive Fee that is payable in a calendar quarter is limited to the lesser of (i) 20% of the amount by which the Company’s pre-incentive fee net investment income for such calendar quarter exceeds the 2.0% hurdle, subject to the Catch-up, and (ii) (x) 20% of the cumulative net increase in net assets resulting from operations for the then current and 11 preceding quarters minus (y) the cumulative incentive fees accrued and/or paid for the 11 preceding calendar quarters. For the foregoing purpose, the “cumulative net increase in net assets resulting from operations” is the amount, if positive, of the sum of pre-incentive fee net investment income, realized gains and losses and unrealized appreciation and depreciation of the Company for the then current and 11 preceding calendar quarters. In addition, the Advisor is not paid the portion of such incentive fee that is attributable to deferred interest until the Company actually receives such interest in cash.
For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018, the Company incurred $1,373,854 and $968,826, respectively, of Investment Income Incentive Fees. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $1,634,588 and $1,936,538, respectively, of such incentive fees were payable to the Advisor, of which $1,399,232 and $1,675,804, respectively, are currently payable (as explained below). As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $235,356 and $260,734, respectively, of incentive fees incurred but not paid by the Company were generated from deferred interest (i.e. PIK, certain discount accretion and deferred interest) and are not payable until such amounts are received by the Company in cash.
Capital Gains Incentive Fee
The Company also pays the Advisor an incentive fee based on capital gains (the “Capital Gains Incentive Fee”). The Capital Gains Incentive Fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the investment management agreement, as of the termination date). The Capital Gains Incentive Fee is equal to 20.0% of the Company’s cumulative aggregate realized capital gains from Inception through the end of that calendar year, computed net of the cumulative aggregate realized capital losses and cumulative aggregate unrealized capital depreciation through the end of such year. The aggregate amount of any previously paid Capital Gain Incentive Fees is subtracted from such Capital Gain Incentive Fees calculated.
U.S. GAAP requires that the incentive fee accrual considers the cumulative aggregate realized gains and losses and unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation of investments or other financial instruments in the calculation, as an incentive fee would be payable if such realized gains and losses and unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation were realized, even though such realized gains and losses and unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation is not permitted to be considered in calculating the fee actually payable under the investment advisory agreement (the “Capital Gains Incentive Fee”). There can be no assurance that unrealized appreciation or depreciation will be realized in the future. Accordingly, such fees, as calculated and accrued, would not necessarily be payable under the investment advisory agreement, and may never be paid based upon the computation of incentive fees in subsequent periods. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company accrued $1,161,757 and $0, respectively, related to the Capital Gains Incentive Fee. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $1,242,795 and $81,038, respectively, of Capital Gains Incentive Fees were accrued but not currently payable to the Advisor, as they are deferred pursuant to the investment advisory agreement.
The following tables summarize the components of the incentive fees discussed above:
Director Fees
For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded an expense relating to director fees of $104,000 and $92,000. As of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, no director fees were payable to the Company’s directors.
Co-Investment Pursuant to SEC Order
On October 23, 2013, the Company received an exemptive order (the “Prior Order”) from the SEC to co-invest with private funds managed by Stellus Capital Management where doing so is consistent with the Company’s investment strategy as well as applicable law (including the terms and conditions of the exemptive order issued by the SEC). On December 18, 2018, the Company received a new exemptive order (the “Order”) that supersedes the Prior Order and permits the Company greater flexibility to enter into co-investment transactions. The Order expands on the Prior Order and allows the Company to co-invest with additional types of private funds, other BDCs, and registered investment companies managed by Stellus Capital Management or an adviser that is controlled, controlling, or under common control with Stellus Capital Management, subject to the conditions included therein. Pursuant to the Order, a “required majority” (as defined in Section 57(o) of the 1940 Act) of the Company’s independent directors must make certain conclusions in connection with a co-investment transaction, including (1) the terms of the proposed transaction, including the consideration to be paid, are reasonable and fair to the Company and its stockholders and do not involve overreaching of the Company or its stockholders on the part of any person concerned and (2) the transaction is consistent with the interests of the Company’s stockholders and is consistent with its investment objectives and strategies. The Company co-invests, subject to the conditions in the Order, with private credit funds managed by Stellus Capital Management that have an investment strategy that is similar or identical to the Company’s investment strategy, and the Company may co-invest with other BDCs and registered investment companies managed by Stellus Capital Management or an adviser that is controlled, controlling, or under common control with Stellus Capital Management in the future. The Company believes that such co-investments may afford it additional investment opportunities and an ability to achieve greater diversification.
Administrative Agent
The Company serves as the administrative agent on certain investment transactions, including co-investments with its affiliates under the Order. As of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was no cash due to other investment funds related to interest paid by a borrower to the Company as administrative agent. Any such amount would be included in “Other Accrued Expenses and Liabilities” on the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
License Agreement
The Company has entered into a license agreement with Stellus Capital pursuant to which Stellus Capital has agreed to grant the Company a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to use the name “Stellus Capital.” Under this agreement, the Company has a right to use the “Stellus Capital” name for so long as Stellus Capital or one of its affiliates remains its investment adviser. Other than with respect to this limited license, the Company has no legal right to the “Stellus Capital” name. This license agreement will remain in effect for so long as the investment advisory agreement with Stellus Capital is in effect.
Administration Agreement
The Company entered into an administration agreement with Stellus Capital pursuant to which Stellus Capital will furnish the Company with office facilities and equipment and will provide the Company with the clerical, bookkeeping, recordkeeping and other administrative services necessary to conduct day-to-day operations. Under this administration agreement, Stellus Capital will perform, or oversee the performance of, the its required administrative services, which includes, among other things, being responsible for the financial records which the Company is required to maintain and preparing reports to its stockholders and reports filed with the SEC.
For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recorded expenses of $360,144 and $313,833 respectively, relating to the administration agreement. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $360,144 and $323,188, respectively, remained payable to Stellus Capital under the administration agreement.
Indemnifications
The investment advisory agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of its duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of its duties and obligations under the investment advisory agreement, Stellus Capital and its officers, managers, partners, agents, employees, controlling persons and members, and any other person or entity affiliated with it, are entitled to indemnification from the Company for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of Stellus Capital’s services under the investment advisory agreement or otherwise as our investment adviser.
NOTE 3 — DISTRIBUTIONS
Distributions are generally declared by the Company’s board of directors each calendar quarter, paid monthly and recognized as distribution liabilities on the ex-dividend date. The Company intends to distribute net realized gains (i.e., net capital gains in excess of net capital losses), if any, at least annually. The stockholder distributions, if any, will be determined by the board of directors. Any distribution to stockholders will be declared out of assets legally available for distribution.
The following table reflects the Company’s distributions declared and paid or to be paid on its common stock since Inception:
The Company has adopted an “opt out” dividend reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) pursuant to which a stockholder whose shares are held in his own name will receive distributions in shares of the Company’s common stock under the Company’s DRIP unless it elects to receive distributions in cash. Stockholders whose shares are held in the name of a broker or the nominee of a broker may have distributions reinvested only if such service is provided by the broker or the nominee, or if the broker of the nominee permits participation in our DRIP.
Although distributions paid in the form of additional shares of the Company’s common stock will generally be subject to U.S. federal, state and local taxes in the same manner as cash distributions, investors participating in the Company’s DRIP will not receive any corresponding cash distributions with which to pay any such applicable taxes. Any distributions reinvested through the issuance of shares through the Company’s DRIP will increase the Company’s gross assets on which the base management fee and the incentive fee are determined and paid to Stellus Capital. The Company issued no shares through the DRIP during the three months ended March 31, 2019. The Company issued 7,931 shares in connection with the DRIP during the three months ended March 31, 2018.
NOTE 4 — EQUITY OFFERINGS AND RELATED EXPENSES
The table below illustrates the number of common stock shares the Company issued since Inception through various equity offerings and pursuant to the Company’s DRIP.
The Company issued 0 and 7,931 shares, respectively, of common stock through the DRIP for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018.
The Company issued 2,750,000 shares in a secondary offering on March 15, 2019. Gross proceeds resulting from the secondary offering totaled $39,682,500 and underwriting and other expenses totaled $1,137,891. The per share offering price for the secondary offering was $14.43. See Note 12 for a discussion on the underwriters’ exercise of their overallotment option subsequent to March 31, 2019.
NOTE 5 — NET INCREASE IN NET ASSETS PER COMMON SHARE
The following information sets forth the computation of net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018.
NOTE 6 — PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AND FAIR VALUE
In accordance with the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements and disclosures under U.S. GAAP, the Company discloses the fair value of its investments in a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The guidance establishes three levels of the fair value hierarchy as follows:
Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2 — Quoted prices in markets that are not considered to be active or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly;
Level 3 — Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
The level of an asset or liability within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. However, the determination of what constitutes “observable” requires significant judgment by management.
The Company considers whether the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased and identifies transactions that are not orderly in determining fair value. Accordingly, if the Company determines that either the volume and/or level of activity for an asset or liability has significantly decreased (from normal conditions for that asset or liability) or price quotations or observable inputs are not associated with orderly transactions, increased analysis and management judgment will be required to estimate fair value. Valuation techniques such as an income approach might be appropriate to supplement or replace a market approach in those circumstances.
At March 31, 2019, the Company had investments in 55 portfolio companies. The total fair value and cost of the investments were $517,411,814 and $520,096,508, respectively. The composition of our investments as of March 31, 2019 is as follows:
(1) Includes unitranche investments, which account for 20.2% of our portfolio at fair value. Unitranche structures may combine characteristics of first lien senior secured as well as second lien and/or subordinated loans and our unitranche loans will expose us to the risks associated with the second lien and subordinated loans to the extent we invest in the “last-out” tranche.
At December 31, 2018, the Company had investments in 57 portfolio companies. The total cost and fair value of the investments were $502,743,649 and $504,483,668 respectively. The composition of our investments as of December 31, 2018 was as follows:
(1) Includes unitranche investments, which account for 20.6% of our portfolio at fair value. Unitranche structures may combine characteristics of first lien senior secured as well as second lien and/or subordinated loans and our unitranche loans will expose us to the risks associated with the second lien and subordinated loans to the extent we invest in the “last-out” tranche.
The Company’s investment portfolio may contain loans that are in the form of lines of credit or revolving credit facilities, which require the Company to provide funding when requested by portfolio companies in accordance with the terms and conditions of the underlying loan agreements. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had eleven and eleven such investments with aggregate unfunded commitments of $20,898,383 and $21,213,962, respectively. The Company maintains sufficient liquidity to fund such unfunded commitments should the need arise.
The fair values of our investments disaggregated into the three levels of the fair value hierarchy based upon the lowest level of significant input used in the valuation as of March 31, 2019 are as follows:
The fair values of our investments disaggregated into the three levels of the fair value hierarchy based upon the lowest level of significant input used in the valuation as of December 31, 2018 are as follows:
The aggregate values of Level 3 portfolio investments changed during the three months ended March 31, 2019 are as follows:
Senior Secured
Loans-First
Lien
Loans-Second
Unsecured
Debt
There were no Level 3 transfers during the three months ended March 31, 2019.
The aggregate values of Level 3 portfolio investments changed during the year ended December 31, 2018 are as follows:
There were no Level 3 transfers during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018.
The following is a summary of geographical concentration of our investment portfolio as of March 31, 2019:
The following is a summary of geographical concentration of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2018:
The following is a summary of industry concentration of our investment portfolio as of March 31, 2019:
The following provides quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements as of March 31, 2019:
The following provides quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2018:
NOTE 7 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is currently not subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us. From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our business, financial condition or results of operations.
As of March 31, 2019, the Company had $20,898,383 of unfunded commitments to provide debt financing to eleven existing portfolio companies. As of December 31, 2018, the Company had $21,213,961 of unfunded commitments to provide debt to eleven existing portfolio companies. As of March 31, 2019, the Company had sufficient liquidity to fund such unfunded loan commitments should the need arise.
NOTE 8 — FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
NOTE 9 — CREDIT FACILITY
On November 7, 2012, the Company entered into a revolving credit facility (the ‘‘Original Facility’’) with various lenders. SunTrust Bank, one of the lenders, served as administrative agent under the Original Facility. The Original Facility was terminated on October 11, 2017, in conjunction with securing and entering into a new senior secured revolving credit agreement, dated as of October 10, 2017, as amended on March 28, 2018 and August 2, 2018, with ZB, N.A., dba Amegy Bank and various other lenders (the ‘‘Credit Facility’’).
The Credit Facility, as amended, provides for borrowings up to a maximum of $180,000,000 on a committed basis with an accordion feature that allows the Company to increase the aggregate commitments up to $195,000,000, subject to new or existing lenders agreeing to participate in the increase and other customary conditions.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, subject to the Company’s election, on a per annum basis equal to (i) LIBOR plus 2.50% (or 2.75% during certain periods in which the Company’s asset coverage ratio is equal to or below 1.90 to 1.00) with no LIBOR floor, or (ii) 1.50% (or 1.75% during certain periods in which the Company’s asset coverage ratio is equal to or below 1.90 to 1.00) plus an alternate base rate based on the highest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% or one month LIBOR plus 1.0%. The Company pays unused commitment fees of 0.50% per annum on the unused lender commitments under the Credit Facility. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears. Any amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility will mature, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable, on October 10, 2021.
The Company’s obligations to the lenders are secured by a first priority security interest in its portfolio of securities and cash not held at the SBIC subsidiary, and excluding short term investments. The Credit Facility contains certain covenants, including but not limited to: (i) maintaining a minimum liquidity test of at least $10,000,000, including cash, liquid investments and undrawn availability, (ii) maintaining an asset coverage ratio of at least 1.75 to 1.0, and (iii) maintaining a minimum stockholder’s equity. As of March 31, 2019, the Company was in compliance with these covenants.
As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $76,050,000 and $99,500,000, respectively, was outstanding under the Credit Facility. The carrying amount of the amount outstanding under the Credit Facility approximates its fair value. The fair values of the Credit Facility is determined in accordance with ASC 820, which defines fair value in terms of the price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value of the Credit Facility is estimated based upon market interest rates for our own borrowings or entities with similar credit risk, adjusted for nonperformance risk, if any. The Company has incurred costs of $1,510,018 in connection with the current Credit Facility, which are being amortized over the life of the facility. Additionally, $341,979 of costs from the Original Facility will continue to be amortized over the remaining life of the Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $1,188,966 and $1,312,773 of such prepaid loan structure fees and administration fees had yet to be amortized, respectively. These prepaid loan fees are presented on the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities as a deduction from the debt liability.
The following is a summary of the Credit Facility, net of prepaid loan structure fees:
Interest is paid quarterly in arrears. The following table summarizes the interest expense and amortized loan fees on the Credit Facility for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
NOTE 10 — SBA-GUARANTEED DEBENTURES
Due to the SBIC subsidiary’s status as a licensed SBIC, we have the ability to issue debentures guaranteed by the SBA at favorable interest rates. Under the regulations applicable to SBIC funds, a single licensee can have outstanding debentures guaranteed by the SBA subject to a regulatory leverage limit, up to two times the amount of regulatory capital. As of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the SBIC subsidiary had $75,000,000 in regulatory capital, as such term is defined by the SBA.
On August 12, 2014, we obtained exemptive relief from the SEC to permit us to exclude the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from our asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. The exemptive relief provides us with increased flexibility under the asset coverage test by permitting us to borrow up to $150,000,000 more than we would otherwise be able to absent the receipt of this exemptive relief.
On a stand-alone basis, the SBIC subsidiary held $226,835,145 and $225,525,663 in assets at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, which accounted for approximately 41.6% and 42.9% of our total consolidated assets, respectively.
Debentures guaranteed by the SBA have fixed interest rates that equal prevailing 10-year Treasury Note rates plus a market spread and have a maturity of ten years with interest payable semi-annually. The principal amount of the debentures is not required to be paid before maturity, but may be pre-paid at any time with no prepayment penalty. As of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the SBIC subsidiary had $150,000,000 of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding. SBA-guaranteed debentures incur upfront fees of 3.425%, which consists of a 1.00% commitment fee and a 2.425% issuance discount, which are amortized over the life of the SBA-guaranteed debentures. Once pooled, which occurs in March and September each year, the SBA-guaranteed debentures bear interest at a fixed rate that is set to the current 10-year treasury rate plus a spread at each pooling date.
The following table summarizes the SBIC subsidiary’s SBA-guaranteed debentures as of March 31, 2019:
As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the carrying amount of the SBA-guaranteed debentures approximated their fair value. The fair values of the SBA-guaranteed debentures are determined in accordance with ASC 820, which defines fair value in terms of the price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value of the SBA-guaranteed debentures are estimated based upon market interest rates for our own borrowings or entities with similar credit risk, adjusted for nonperformance risk, if any. At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the SBA-guaranteed debentures would be deemed to be Level 3, as defined in Note 6.
As of March 31, 2019, the Company has incurred $5,137,500 in financing costs related to the SBA-guaranteed debentures since receiving our license, which were recorded as prepaid loan fees. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $3,463,179 and $3,612,198 of prepaid financing costs had yet to be amortized, respectively. These prepaid loan fees are presented on the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities as a deduction from the debt liability.
The following is a summary of the SBA-guaranteed debentures, net of prepaid loan fees:
The following table summarizes the interest expense and amortized fees on the SBA-guaranteed debentures for the three ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
NOTE 11 — NOTES
On May 5, 2014, the Company closed a public offering of $25,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% notes (the ‘‘2019 Notes’’) due April 30, 2019. The Company redeemed all $25,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of the 2019 Notes on September 20, 2017 at 100% of their principal amount, plus the accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date.
There was no interest expense or deferred financing costs on the 2019 Notes for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.
On August 21, 2017, the Company issued $42,500,000 in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% fixed-rate notes due September 15, 2022 (the “2022 Notes”). On September 8, 2017, the Company issued an additional $6,375,000 in aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes pursuant to a full exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option. The 2022 Notes will mature on September 15, 2022, and may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at the Company’s option on or after September 15, 2019 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the outstanding principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Interest is payable quarterly beginning December 15, 2017.
The Company used all of the net proceeds from this offering to fully redeem the 2019 Notes and a portion of the amount outstanding under the Original Facility. As of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the aggregate carrying amount of the 2022 Notes was approximately $48,875,000 and the fair value of the Notes was approximately $49,129,150 and $47,604,250, respectively. The 2022 Notes are listed on New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “SCA”. The fair value of the Notes is based on the closing price of the security, which is a Level 2 input under ASC 820 due to sufficient trading volume.
In connection with the issuance and maintenance of the 2022 Notes, we have incurred $1,688,961 of fees which are being amortized over the term of the 2022 Notes, of which $1,151,240 and $1,233,203 remains to be amortized as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. These financing costs are presented on the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities as a deduction from the debt liability.
The following table summarizes the interest expense and deferred financing costs on the 2022 Notes for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:
The following is a summary of the 2022 Notes Payable, net of deferred financing costs:
The indenture and supplements thereto relating to the 2022 Notes contain certain covenants, including but not limited to (i) a requirement that the Company comply with the asset coverage requirements of the 1940 Act or any successor provisions, and (ii) a requirement to provide financial information to the holders of the notes and the trustee under the indenture if the Company should no longer be subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act.
NOTE 12 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Exercise of Underwriter’s Option
On April 11, 2019, the Company issued 202,149 shares of common stock through the underwriter’s partial exercise of their option to purchase additional shares subsequent to the Company’s secondary offering (see Note 4). Gross proceeds totaled $2,917,010 and underwriting and other expenses totaled $91,634. The Company used the net proceeds to pay off a portion of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility.
Investment Portfolio
On April 11, 2019, the Company invested $8,000,000 in the first lien term loan of Munch’s Supply LLC, a wholesale distributor of HVAC equipment, parts, and supplies primarily to dealers and contractors. Additionally, the Company committed $2,222,222 in the unfunded delayed draw term loan, and invested $500,000 in the equity of the company.
On April 17, 2019, the Company received full repayment on the second lien term loan of U.S. Auto Sales, Inc. for total proceeds of $4,500,000.
On April 26, 2019, the Company invested $10,000,000 in the first lien term loan of Whisps Brands, an importer of Italian cheese and a leading cheese manufacturer. Additionally, the Company invested $500,000 in the equity of the company.
On April 30, 2019, the Company received full repayment on the second lien term loan of Livingston International, Inc. for total proceeds of $6,841,739.
On May 1, 2019, the Company invested $4,750,000 in the first lien term loan of Exacta Land Surveyors, LLC, an existing portfolio company. Additionally, we invested $164,893 in the equity of the company.
On May 2, 2019, the Company received full repayment on the second lien term loan of Magdata Intermediate Holdings, LLC for total proceeds of $15.1 million, including a $0.3 million prepayment fee.
On May 6, 2019, the Company invested $7,615,000 in NS412, LLC, a provider of online curricula for health with a focus on weight loss. Additionally, the Company invested $750,000 in the equity of the company.
Credit Facility
The outstanding balance under the Credit Facility as of May 6, 2019 was $56,800,000.
Dividend Declared
On April 11, 2019, the Company’s board of directors declared a regular monthly dividend for each of April, May and June 2019 as follows:
Consolidated Schedule of Investments in and Advances to Affiliates
(dollars in thousands)
This schedule should be read in conjunction with Stellus’s consolidated financial statements, including the consolidated schedule of investments and notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements, which relate to future events or our future performance or financial condition. The forward-looking statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-Q involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:
Such forward-looking statements may include statements preceded by, followed by or that otherwise include the words ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘might,’’ ‘‘will,’’ ‘‘intend,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘can,’’ ‘‘would,’’ ‘‘expect,’’ ‘‘believe,’’ ‘‘estimate,’’ ‘‘anticipate,’’ ‘‘predict,’’ ‘‘potential,’’ ‘‘plan’’ or similar words.
We have based the forward-looking statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q on information available to us on the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, and future results could differ materially from historical performance. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, unless required by law or SEC rule or regulation. You are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we in the future may file with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.
Overview
We were organized as a Maryland corporation on May 18, 2012, and formally commenced operations on November 7, 2012. Our investment objective is to maximize the total return to our stockholders in the form of current income and capital appreciation through debt and related equity investments in middle-market companies.
We are an externally managed, non-diversified, closed-end investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. Our investment activities are managed by our investment adviser, Stellus Capital Management.
As a BDC, we are required to comply with certain regulatory requirements. For instance, as a BDC, we may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” specified in the 1940 Act unless, at the time the acquisition is made, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. Qualifying assets include investments in ‘‘eligible portfolio companies.’’ Under the relevant SEC rules, the term ‘‘eligible portfolio company’’ includes all private operating companies, operating companies whose securities are not listed on a national securities exchange, and certain public operating companies that have listed their securities on a national securities exchange and have a market capitalization of less than $250 million, in each case organized and with their principal of business in the United States.
We have elected to be treated for U.S. federal tax purposes as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. To maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements. As of March 31, 2019, we were in compliance with the RIC requirements. As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on any income we distribute to our stockholders.
On April 4, 2018, the Board, including a ‘‘required majority’’ (as such term is defined in Section 57(o) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the ‘‘1940 Act’’)) of the Board, approved the application of the modified asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act. The Board also approved the submission of a proposal to stockholders to approve the application of the modified asset coverage requirements set forth in Section 61(a)(2) of the 1940 Act, which was approved by stockholders at our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders. As a result, the asset coverage ratio applicable to us was decreased from 200% to 150%, effective June 28, 2018. As of March 31, 2019, our asset coverage ratio was 314%. The amount of leverage that we employ at any time depends on our assessment of the market and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing.
Portfolio Composition and Investment Activity
Portfolio Composition
We originate and invest primarily in privately-held middle-market companies (typically those with $5.0 million to $50.0 million of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization)) through first lien (including unitranche), second lien, and unsecured debt financing, often times with a corresponding equity investment.
As of March 31, 2019, we had $517.4 million (at fair value) invested in 55 portfolio companies. As of March 31, 2019, our portfolio included approximately 61% of first lien debt, 28% of second lien debt, 5% of unsecured debt and 6% of equity investments at fair value. The composition of our investments at cost and fair value as of March 31, 2019 was as follows:
(1) Includes unitranche investments, which account for 20.2% of our portfolio at fair value. Unitranche structures may combine characteristics of first lien senior secured as well as second lien and/or subordinated loans and our unitranche loans will expose us to the risks associated with second lien and subordinated loans to the extent we invest in the “last-out” tranche.
As of December 31, 2018, we had $504.5 million (at fair value) invested in 57 portfolio companies. As of December 31, 2018, our portfolio included approximately 58% of first lien debt, 30% of second lien debt, 5% of unsecured debt and 7% of equity investments at fair value. The composition of our investments at cost and fair value as of December 31, 2018 was as follows:
(1) Includes unitranche investments, which account for 20.6% of our portfolio at December 31, 2018 at fair value. Unitranche structures may combine characteristics of first lien senior secured as well as second lien and/or subordinated loans and our unitranche loans will expose us to the risks associated with second lien and subordinated loans to the extent we invest in the “last-out” tranche.
Our investment portfolio may contain loans that are in the form of lines of credit or revolving credit facilities, which require us to provide funding when requested by portfolio companies in accordance with the terms and conditions of the underlying loan agreements. As of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had unfunded commitments of $20.9 million and $21.2 million, respectively, to provide debt financing for eleven portfolio companies. As of March 31, 2019, we had sufficient liquidity to fund such unfunded commitments should the need arise.
The following is a summary of industry concentration of our investment portfolio as of December 31, 2018:
At March 31, 2019, our average portfolio company investment at amortized cost and fair value was approximately $9.5 million and $9.4 million, respectively, and our largest portfolio company investment at amortized cost and fair value was $21.6 million and $22.6 million, respectively. At December 31, 2018, our average portfolio company investment at both amortized cost and fair value was approximately $8.9 million, and our largest portfolio company investment at amortized cost and fair value was approximately $21.6 million and $22.3 million, respectively.
At both March 31, 2019 and December 31,2018, 91% of our debt investments bore interest based on floating rates (subject to interest rate floors), such as LIBOR, and 9% bore interest at fixed rates.
The weighted average yield on all of our debt investments as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 was 10.7% and 10.9%, respectively. The weighted average yield was computed using the effective interest rates for all of our debt investments, including accretion of original issue discount. The weighted average yield of our debt investments is not the same as a return on investment for our stockholder, but, rather relates to a portion of our investment portfolio and is calculated before the payment of all of our and our subsidiaries’ fees and expenses.
As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had cash and cash equivalents of $23.8 million and $17.5 million, respectively.
Investment Activity
During the three months ended March 31, 2019, we made an aggregate of $28.6 million (net of fees) of investments in one new portfolio company and four existing portfolio companies. During the three months ended March 31, 2019, we received an aggregate of $21.8 million in proceeds from repayments of our investments.
Our level of investment activity can vary substantially from period to period depending on many factors, including the amount of debt and equity capital required by middle-market companies, the level of merger and acquisition activity, the general economic environment and the competitive environment for the types of investments we make.
Asset Quality
In addition to various risk management and monitoring tools, Stellus Capital uses an investment rating system to characterize and monitor the credit profile and expected level of returns on each investment in our investment portfolio. This investment rating system uses a five-level numeric scale. The following is a description of the conditions associated with each investment category:
(1)One portfolio company appears in two categories as of both periods
Loans and Debt Securities on Non-Accrual Status
We will not accrue interest on loans and debt securities if we have reason to doubt our ability to collect such interest. As of March 31, 2019, we had three loans on non-accrual status which represented approximately 2.7% of our loan portfolio at cost and 1.7% at fair value. As of December 31, 2018, we had four loans on non-accrual status, which represented approximately 3.9% of our loan portfolio at cost and 2.8% at fair value.
Results of Operations
An important measure of our financial performance is net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations, which includes net investment income (loss), net realized gain (loss) and net unrealized appreciation (depreciation). Net investment income (loss) is the difference between our income from interest, dividends, fees and other investment income and our operating expenses including interest on borrowed funds. Net realized gain (loss) on investments is the difference between the proceeds received from dispositions of portfolio investments and their amortized cost. Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments is the net change in the fair value of our investment portfolio.
Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018
Revenues
We generate revenue in the form of interest income on debt investments and capital gains and distributions, if any, on investment securities that we may acquire in portfolio companies. Our debt investments typically have a term of five to seven years and bear interest at a fixed or floating rate. Interest on our debt securities is generally payable quarterly. Payments of principal on our debt investments may be amortized over the stated term of the investment, deferred for several years or due entirely at maturity. In some cases, our debt investments may pay interest in-kind, or PIK. Any outstanding principal amount of our debt securities and any accrued but unpaid interest will generally become due at the maturity date. The level of interest income we receive is directly related to the balance of interest-bearing investments multiplied by the weighted average yield of our investments. We expect that the total dollar amount of interest and any dividend income that we earn will increase as the size of our investment portfolio increases. In addition, we may generate revenue in the form of prepayment fees, commitment, loan origination, structuring or due diligence fees, fees for providing significant managerial assistance and consulting fees.
The following shows the breakdown of investment income for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions).
(1) For the three months ended March 31, 2019, we recognized $0.3 million of non-recurring income related to early repayments, amendments to specific loan positions, and the recognition of previously reserved income from a prior period. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, we recognized $0.1 million of non-recurring income related to early repayments and amendments to specific loan positions.
The increase in interest income from the respective periods was due to the growth in the overall investment portfolio.
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses include the payment of fees to Stellus Capital under the investment advisory agreement, our allocable portion of overhead expenses under the administration agreement and other operating costs described below. We bear all other out-of-pocket costs and expenses of our operations and transactions, which may include:
The following shows the breakdown of operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions).
The increase in operating expenses for the respective periods was primarily due to 1) an increase in management fees, directly related to the growth of our portfolio, 2) increased interest expense due to our SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding during the period, and 3) increase in incentive fees due to performance; most notably the accrual of a capital gains incentive fee, which results from the increase in market value on our current portfolio as well as realized gains. See Note 2 for further discussion on incentive fees.
Net Investment Income
For the three months ended March 31, 2019, net investment income was $4.3 million, or $0.27 per common share (based on 16,351,032 weighted-average common shares outstanding at March 31, 2019).
For the three months ended March 31, 2018, net investment income was $4.5 million, or $0.28 per common share (based on 15,952,841 weighted-average common shares outstanding at March 31, 2018).
Net Realized Gains and Losses
We measure realized gains or losses by the difference between the net proceeds from the repayment, sale or disposition and the amortized cost basis of the investment, using the specific identification method, without regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously recognized.
Repayments of investments and amortization of other investments for the three months ended March 31, 2019 totaled $21.8 million and net realized gain totaled $10.2 million.
Repayments of investments and amortization of other investments and a non-cash conversion of debt to equity for the three months ended March 31, 2018 totaled $15.6 million and net realized gain totaled $1.3 million.
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/(Depreciation) of Investments
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) primarily reflects the change in portfolio investment values during the reporting period, including the reversal of previously recorded appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments and cash equivalents for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 totaled $(4.4) million and $1.5 million, respectively.
The net depreciation for the three month period ending March 31, 2019 resulted primarily from the accounting reversal relating to a certain realized gain in the portfolio offset by appreciation resulting from the general tightening of credit spreads. For the three month period ending March 31, 2018, the net change in unrealized appreciation was due to a general tightening of credit spreads.
Provision for Taxes on Unrealized Appreciation on Investments
We have direct wholly owned subsidiaries that have elected to be taxable entities (the “Taxable Subsidiaries”). The Taxable Subsidiaries permit us to hold equity investments in portfolio companies which are “pass through” entities for tax purposes and continue to comply with the “source income” requirements contained in RIC tax provisions of the Code. The Taxable Subsidiaries are not consolidated with us for income tax purposes and may generate income tax expense, benefit, and the related tax assets and liabilities, as a result of their ownership of certain portfolio investments. The income tax expense, or benefit, if any, and related tax assets and liabilities are reflected in our consolidated financial statements. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, we recognized a provision for income tax on unrealized investments of $12.0 thousand and $0 for the Taxable Subsidiaries, respectively. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was $80.6 thousand and $68.0 thousand of deferred tax liability on the Consolidated Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
For the three months ended March 31, 2019, net increase in net assets resulting from operations totaled $10.1 million, or $0.62 per common share (based on 16,351,032 weighted-average common shares outstanding at March 31, 2019).
For the three months ended March 31, 2018, net increase in net assets resulting from operations totaled $7.3 million, or $0.46 per common share (based on 15,952,841 weighted-average common shares outstanding at March 31, 2018).
The increase in the net increase in net assets between the respective periods was due to large realized gains during the three months ended March 31, 2019, mostly due to the realization of one equity position.
Financial condition, liquidity and capital resources
Cash Flows from Operating and Financing Activities
Our operating activities used net cash of $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019, primarily in connection with the purchase and origination of new portfolio investments, some of which was offset by the sales and repayments on our investments. Our financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2019 provided cash of $9.6 million due to a secondary offering during the quarter, offset by repayments on our Credit Facility. See Note 4 for further discussion.
Our operating activities used net cash of $51.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018, primarily in connection with the purchase and origination of new portfolio investments, some of which was offset by the sales and repayments on our investments. Our financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2018 provided cash of $72.2 million due to net borrowings under the Credit Facility during the period.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity and capital resources are derived from the Credit Facility, the 2022 Notes, SBA-guaranteed debentures and cash flows from operations, including investment sales and repayments, and income earned. Our primary use of funds from operations includes investments in portfolio companies and other operating expenses we incur, as well as the payment of dividends to the holders of our common stock. We used, and expect to continue to use, these capital resources as well as proceeds from turnover within our portfolio and from public and private offerings of securities to finance our investment activities.
Although we expect to fund the growth of our investment portfolio through the net proceeds from future public and private equity offerings and issuances of senior securities or future borrowings to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, our plans to raise capital may not be successful. In this regard, if our common stock trades at a price below our then-current net asset value per share, we may be limited in our ability to raise equity capital given that we cannot sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share unless our stockholders approve such a sale and our board of directors makes certain determinations in connection therewith. A proposal, approved by our stockholders at our 2018 annual stockholders meeting, authorizes us to sell shares equal to up to 25% of our outstanding common stock of our common stock below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock in one or more offerings. This authorization will expire on June 28, 2019, the one year anniversary of our 2018 annual stockholders meeting. We would need similar future approval from our stockholders to issue shares below the then current net asset value per share any time after the expiration of the current approval. In addition, we intend to distribute between 90% and 100% of our taxable income to our stockholders in order to satisfy the requirements applicable to RICs under Subchapter M of the Code. Consequently, we may not have the funds or the ability to fund new investments, to make additional investments in our portfolio companies, to fund our unfunded commitments to portfolio companies or to repay borrowings. In addition, the illiquidity of our portfolio investments may make it difficult for us to sell these investments when desired and, if we are required to sell these investments, we may realize significantly less than their recorded value.
Also, as a BDC, we generally are required to meet a coverage ratio of total assets, less liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, to total senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any outstanding preferred stock, of at least 150% effective June 28, 2018 (at least 200% prior to June 28, 2018). This requirement limits the amount that we may borrow. We have received exemptive relief from the SEC to permit us to exclude the debt of our SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from the definition of senior securities in the asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. We were in compliance with the asset coverage ratios at all times. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, our asset coverage ratio was 314% and 251%, respectively. The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on our assessment of market conditions and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing, such as the maturity, covenant package and rate structure of the proposed borrowings, our ability to raise funds through the issuance of shares of our common stock and the risks of such borrowings within the context of our investment outlook. Ultimately, we only intend to use leverage if the expected returns from borrowing to make investments will exceed the cost of such borrowing.As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had cash and cash equivalents of $23.8 million and $17.5 million, respectively.
On November 7, 2012, we entered into a revolving credit facility (the ‘‘Original Facility’’) with various lenders. SunTrust Bank, one of the lenders, served as administrative agent under the Original Facility. The Original Facility was terminated on October 11, 2017, in conjunction with securing and entering into a new senior secured revolving credit agreement, dated as of October 10, 2017, as amended on March 28, 2018 and August 2, 2018, with ZB, N.A., dba Amegy Bank and various other lenders (the ‘‘Credit Facility’’).
The Credit Facility provides for borrowings up to a maximum of $180.0 million on a committed basis with an accordion feature that allows us to increase the aggregate commitments up to $195.0 million, subject to new or existing lenders agreeing to participate in the increase and other customary conditions.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, subject to our election, on a per annum basis equal to (i) LIBOR plus 2.50% (or 2.75% during certain periods in which our asset coverage ratio is equal to or below 1.90 to 1.00) with no LIBOR floor, or (ii) 1.50% (or 1.75% during certain periods in which the our asset coverage ratio is equal to or below 1.90 to 1.00) plus an alternate base rate based on the highest of the Prime Rate, Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% or one month LIBOR plus 1.0%. We pay unused commitment fees of 0.50% per annum on the unused lender commitments under the Credit Facility. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears. Any amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility will mature, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable, on October 10, 2021.
Our obligations to the lenders are secured by a first priority security interest in its portfolio of securities and cash not held at the SBIC subsidiary, but excluding short term investments. The Credit Facility contains certain covenants, including but not limited to: (i) maintaining a minimum liquidity test of at least $10.0 million, including cash, liquid investments and undrawn availability, (ii) maintaining an asset coverage ratio of at least 1.75 to 1.0, and (iii) maintaining a minimum stockholder’s equity. As of March 31, 2019, we were in compliance with these covenants.
As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $76.1 and $99.6 million, respectively, was outstanding under the Credit Facility. The carrying amount of the amount outstanding under the Credit Facility approximates its fair value. The fair values of the Credit Facility is determined in accordance with ASC 820, which defines fair value in terms of the price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value of the Credit Facility is estimated based upon market interest rates for our own borrowings or entities with similar credit risk, adjusted for nonperformance risk, if any. We incurred additional costs of $1.5 million in connection with the current Credit Facility, which are being amortized over the life of the facility. Additionally, $0.3 million of costs from the Original Facility will continue to be amortized over the remaining life of the Credit Facility. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $1.2 and $1.3 million of such prepaid loan structure fees and administration fees had yet to be amortized, respectively. These prepaid loan fees are presented on the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities as a deduction from the debt liability.
Interest is paid quarterly in arrears. The following table summarizes the interest expense and amortized loan fees on the Credit Facility for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
SBA-Guaranteed Debentures
Due to the SBIC subsidiary’s status as a licensed SBIC, we have the ability to issue debentures guaranteed by the SBA at favorable interest rates. Under the regulations applicable to SBIC funds, a single licensee can have outstanding debentures guaranteed by the SBA subject to a regulatory leverage limit, up to two times the amount of regulatory capital, as such term is defined by the SBA. As of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the SBIC subsidiary had $75.0 million in regulatory capital.
On August 12, 2014, we obtained exemptive relief from the SEC to permit us to exclude the debt of the SBIC subsidiary guaranteed by the SBA from our 200% asset coverage test under the 1940 Act. The exemptive relief provides us with increased flexibility under the 200% asset coverage test by permitting us to borrow up to $150.0 million more than we would otherwise be able to absent the receipt of this exemptive relief.
On a stand-alone basis, the SBIC subsidiary held $226.8 and $225.5 million in assets at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, which accounted for approximately 41.6% and 42.9% of our total consolidated assets, respectively.
Debentures guaranteed by the SBA have fixed interest rates that equal prevailing 10-year Treasury Note rates plus a market spread and have a maturity of ten years with interest payable semi-annually. The principal amount of the debentures is not required to be paid before maturity, but may be pre-paid at any time with no prepayment penalty. As of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the SBIC subsidiary had $150.0 million of SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding. See Note 10 for further detail on the SBA-guaranteed debentures outstanding. SBA-guaranteed debentures incur upfront fees of 3.425%, which consists of a 1.00% commitment fee and a 2.425% issuance discount, which are amortized over the life of the SBA-guaranteed debentures. Once pooled, which occurs in March and September each year, the SBA-guaranteed debentures bear interest at a fixed rate that is set to the current 10-year treasury rate plus a spread at each pooling date.
As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the carrying amount of the SBA-guaranteed debentures approximated their fair value. The fair values of the SBA-guaranteed debentures are determined in accordance with ASC 820, which defines fair value in terms of the price that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value of the SBA-guaranteed debentures are estimated based upon market interest rates for our own borrowings or entities with similar credit risk, adjusted for nonperformance risk, if any. At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 the SBA-guaranteed debentures would be deemed to be Level 3, as defined in Note 6.
As of March 31, 2019, we have incurred $5.1 million in financing costs related to the SBA-guaranteed debentures since the SBIC subsidiary received its license, which were recorded as prepaid loan fees. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $3.5 and $3.6 million of prepaid financing costs had yet to be amortized, respectively. These prepaid loan fees are presented on the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities as a deduction from the debt liability.
The following table summarizes the interest expense and amortized fees on the SBA-guaranteed debentures for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (in millions):
Notes Offering
On May 5, 2014, we closed a public offering of $25.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% notes (the “2019 Notes”), due on April 30, 2019. We redeemed all $25.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2019 Notes on September 20, 2017 at 100% of their principal amount, plus the accrued and unpaid interest thereon through the redemption date.
On August 21, 2017, we issued $42.5 million in aggregate principal amount of 5.75% fixed-rate notes due September 15, 2022 (the “2022 Notes”). On September 8, 2017, we issued an additional $6.4 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes pursuant to a full exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option. The 2022 Notes will mature on September 15, 2022, and may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option on or after September 15, 2019 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the outstanding principal, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Interest is payable quarterly beginning December 15, 2017.
We used all of the net proceeds from this offering to fully redeem the 2019 Notes and a portion of the amount outstanding under the Original Facility. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the aggregate carrying amount of the 2022 Notes was approximately $48.9 million for both periods and the fair value of the Notes was approximately $49.1 million and $47.6 million, respectively. The 2022 Notes are listed on New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol “SCA”. The fair value of the Notes is based on the closing price of the security, which is a Level 2 input under ASC 820 due to sufficient trading volume.
In connection with the issuance and maintenance of the 2022 Notes, we have incurred $1.7 million of fees which are being amortized over the term of the 2022 Notes, of which $1.2 million remains to be amortized as of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. These financing costs are presented on the consolidated statement of assets and liabilities as a deduction from the debt liability.
The following table summarizes the interest expense and deferred financing costs on the 2022 Notes for the three and three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 (dollars in millions):
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We may be a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of our portfolio companies. As of both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, our off-balance sheet arrangements consisted of $20.9 million and $21.2 million, respectively, of unfunded commitments to provide debt financing to eleven of our portfolio companies. As of March 31, 2019, we had sufficient liquidity to fund such unfunded commitments (through cash on hand and available borrowings under the Credit Facility) should the need arise.
Regulated Investment Company Status and Dividends
We have elected to be treated as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. So long as we maintain our qualification as a RIC, we will not be taxed on our investment company taxable income or realized net capital gains, to the extent that such taxable income or gains are distributed, or deemed to be distributed, to stockholders as dividends on a timely basis.
Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses, and generally excludes net unrealized appreciation or depreciation until realized. Distributions declared and paid by us in a year may differ from taxable income for that year as such dividends may include the distribution of current year taxable income or the distribution of prior year taxable income carried forward into and distributed in the current year. Distributions also may include returns of capital.
To qualify for RIC tax treatment, we must, among other things, distribute, with respect to each taxable year, at least 90% of our investment company net taxable income (i.e., our net ordinary income and our realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any). If we maintain our qualification as a RIC, we must also satisfy certain distribution requirements each calendar year in order to avoid a federal excise tax on our undistributed earnings of a RIC.
We intend to distribute to our stockholders between 90% and 100% of our annual taxable income (which includes our taxable interest and fee income). However, the covenants contained in the Credit Facility may prohibit us from making distributions to our stockholders, and, as a result, could hinder our ability to satisfy the distribution requirement. In addition, we may retain for investment some or all of our net taxable capital gains (i.e., realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses) and treat such amounts as deemed distributions to our stockholders. If we do this, our stockholders will be treated as if they received actual distributions of the capital gains we retained and then reinvested the net after-tax proceeds in our common stock. Our stockholders also may be eligible to claim tax credits (or, in certain circumstances, tax refunds) equal to their allocable share of the tax we paid on the capital gains deemed distributed to them. To the extent our taxable earnings for a fiscal taxable year fall below the total amount of our dividends for that fiscal year, a portion of those dividend distributions may be deemed a return of capital to our stockholders.
We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions from time to time. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the asset coverage test for borrowings applicable to us as a business development company under the 1940 Act and due to provisions in Credit Facility. We cannot assure stockholders that they will receive any distributions or distributions at a particular level.
In accordance with certain applicable Treasury regulations and private letter rulings issued by the Internal Revenue Service, a RIC may treat a distribution of its own stock as fulfilling its RIC distribution requirements if each stockholder may elect to receive his or her entire distribution in either cash or stock of the RIC, subject to a limitation that the aggregate amount of cash to be distributed to all stockholders must be at least 20% of the aggregate declared distribution. If too many stockholders elect to receive cash, each stockholder electing to receive cash must receive a pro rata amount of cash (with the balance of the distribution paid in stock). In no event will any stockholder, electing to receive cash, receive less than 20% of his or her entire distribution in cash. If these and certain other requirements are met, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the amount of the dividend paid in stock will be equal to the amount of cash that could have been received instead of stock. We have no current intention of paying dividends in shares of our stock in accordance with these Treasury regulations or private letter rulings.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements contained herein for a description of recent accounting pronouncements, if any, including the expected dates of adoption and the anticipated impact on the financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
See Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements contained herein for a description of critical accounting policies.
Subsequent Events
On April 11, 2019, we issued 202,149 shares of common stock through the underwriter’s partial exercise of their option to purchase additional shares subsequent to our secondary offering (see Note 4). Gross proceeds totaled $2.9 million and underwriting and other expenses totaled $0.1 million. We used the net proceeds to pay off a portion of our outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility.
On April 11, 2019, we invested $8.0 million in the first lien term loan of Munch’s Supply LLC, a wholesale distributor of HVAC equipment, parts, and supplies primarily to dealers and contractors. Additionally, we committed $2.2 million in the unfunded delayed draw term loan, and we invested $0.5 million in the equity of the company.
On April 17, 2019, we received full repayment on the second lien term loan of U.S. Auto Sales, Inc. for total proceeds of $4.5 million.
On April 26, 2019, we invested $10.0 million in the first lien term loan of Whisps Brands, an importer of Italian cheese and a leading cheese manufacturer. Additionally, we invested $0.5 million in the equity of the company.
On April 30, 2019, we received full repayment on the second lien term loan of Livingston International, Inc. for total proceeds of $6.8 million.
On May 1, 2019, we invested $4.8 million in the first lien term loan of Exacta Land Surveyors, LLC, an existing portfolio company. Additionally, we invested $0.2 million in the equity of the company.
On May 2, 2019, we received full repayment on the second lien term loan of Magdata Intermediate Holdings, LLC for total proceeds of $15.1 million, including a $0.3 million prepayment fee.
On May 6, 2019, we invested $7.6 million in NS412, LLC, a provider of online curricula for health with a focus on weight loss. Additionally, we invested $0.8 million in the equity of the company.
The outstanding balance under the Credit Facility as of May 6, 2019 was $56.8 million.
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. At both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, 91% of the loans in our portfolio bore interest at floating rates. These floating rate loans typically bear interest in reference to LIBOR, which are indexed to 30-day or 90-day LIBOR rates, subject to an interest rate floor. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the weighted average interest rate floor on our floating rate loans was 0.97% and 0.94%, respectively.
Assuming that the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as of March 31, 2019 were to remain constant and no actions were taken to alter the existing interest rate sensitivity, the following table shows the annual impact on net income of changes in interest rates:
Although we believe that this measure is indicative of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, it does not adjust for potential changes in credit quality, size and composition of the assets on the balance sheet and other business developments that could affect net increase in net assets resulting from operations. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the potential outcome simulated by this estimate. We may hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contacts subject to the requirements of the 1940 Act. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to our portfolio of investments. For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, we did not engage in hedging activities.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of various members of management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management did not identify any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2019 that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us. From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.
There have been no material changes in the information provided under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of December 31, 2018 other than as provided below. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Our investments in the business services industry are subject to unique risks relating to technological developments, regulatory changes and changes in customer preferences.
Our investments in portfolio companies that operate in the business services industry represent approximately 16.49% of our total portfolio as of March 31, 2019. Our investments in portfolio companies in the business services sector include those that provide services related to data and information, building, cleaning and maintenance services, and energy efficiency services. Portfolio companies in the business services sector are subject to many risks, including the negative impact of regulation, changing technology, a competitive marketplace and difficulty in obtaining financing. Portfolio companies in the business services industry must respond quickly to technological changes and understand the impact of these changes on customers’ preferences. Adverse economic, business, or regulatory developments affecting the business services sector could have a negative impact on the value of our investments in portfolio companies operating in this industry, and therefore could negatively impact our business and results of operations.
None.
Not applicable.
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the SEC:
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.