Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
¨
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number 1-13661
S.Y. BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Kentucky
61-1137529
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
Identification No.)
1040 East Main Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40206
(Address of principal executive offices including zip code)
(502) 582-2571
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of the registrants Common Stock, no par value, outstanding as of July 29, 2010, was 13,702,339.
S.Y. BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Index
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
The following consolidated financial statements of S.Y. Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary, Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company, are submitted herewith:
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
for the six months ended June 30, 2010
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Item 2.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 6.
Exhibits
1
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
June 30,
December 31,
2010
2009
Assets
Cash and due from banks
$
32,171
25,773
Federal funds sold
42,649
6,651
Mortgage loans held for sale
6,763
13,249
Securities available for sale (amortized cost of $205,396 in 2010 and $224,488 in 2009)
211,731
228,225
Securities held to maturity (fair value of $27 in 2010 and $37 in 2009)
25
35
Federal Home Loan Bank stock and other securities
5,772
5,547
Loans
1,477,304
1,435,462
Less allowance for loan losses
22,933
20,000
Net loans
1,454,371
1,415,462
Premises and equipment, net
28,143
28,016
Bank owned life insurance
25,621
25,130
Accrued interest receivable
5,953
5,745
Other assets
46,279
37,646
Total assets
1,859,478
1,791,479
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing
250,427
211,352
Interest bearing
1,223,404
1,206,832
Total deposits
1,473,831
1,418,184
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
53,759
51,321
Federal funds purchased
18,437
19,518
Other short-term borrowings
1,483
1,809
Accrued interest payable
455
427
Other liabilities
38,130
45,223
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
70,448
60,453
Subordinated debentures
40,900
40,930
Total liabilities
1,697,443
1,637,865
Stockholders equity:
Preferred stock, no par value. Authorized 1,000,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding
Common stock, no par value. Authorized 20,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 13,695,379 and 13,606,532 shares in 2010 and 2009, respectively
6,540
6,244
Additional paid-in capital
11,409
9,729
Retained earnings
140,200
135,442
Accumulated other comprehensive income
3,886
2,199
Total stockholders equity
162,035
153,614
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands, except per share data)
For three months ended
For six months ended
Interest income:
19,715
19,204
38,929
37,947
19
17
44
20
53
105
119
181
Securities taxable
1,376
1,187
2,780
2,608
Securities tax-exempt
285
284
533
558
Total interest income
21,448
20,797
42,405
41,314
Interest expense:
Deposits
3,394
4,664
7,076
9,337
Fed funds purchased
8
16
38
81
49
168
108
556
868
1,081
1,648
862
883
1,722
1,758
Total interest expense
4,901
6,480
10,064
12,889
Net interest income
16,547
14,317
32,341
28,425
Provision for loan losses
2,384
2,200
5,079
3,825
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
14,163
12,117
27,262
24,600
Non-interest income:
Investment management and trust services
3,232
2,801
6,493
5,472
Service charges on deposit accounts
2,119
2,038
4,003
3,849
Bankcard transaction revenue
863
747
1,614
1,406
Gains on sales of mortgage loans held for sale
445
444
830
943
Brokerage commissions and fees
503
437
959
822
Bank owned life insurance income
248
245
491
488
Other
576
1,352
1,629
1,645
Total non-interest income
7,986
8,064
16,019
14,625
Non-interest expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits
8,319
7,669
16,408
15,069
Net occupancy expense
1,296
1,013
2,572
2,021
Data processing expense
1,322
1,248
2,459
2,279
Furniture and equipment expense
321
307
635
599
FDIC insurance expense
531
1,245
1,002
1,667
2,655
2,548
5,183
Total non-interest expenses
14,444
14,030
28,259
26,299
Income before income taxes
7,705
6,151
15,022
12,926
Income tax expense
2,149
1,863
4,485
3,901
Net income
5,556
4,288
10,537
9,025
Net income per share:
Basic
0.41
0.32
0.77
0.67
Diluted
0.40
0.31
0.66
Average common shares:
13,690
13,564
13,668
13,532
13,790
13,729
13,752
13,683
3
For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands)
Operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net
1,653
1,009
Deferred income tax benefit
(1,184
)
(848
Gain on sales of mortgage loans held for sale
(830
(943
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale
(54,494
(139,441
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale
61,810
127,875
(491
(488
Decrease in value of private investment fund
(368
(142
Loss on the sale of premises and equipment
(Loss) gain on the sale of other real estate
(51
Stock compensation expense
328
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation arrangements
(48
(98
Reversal of valuation of mortgage servicing rights
(176
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets
(7,804
1,336
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities
11,257
851
Net cash provided by operating activities
25,523
2,115
Investing activities:
Purchases of securities available for sale
(91,798
(116,082
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale
110,259
64,032
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity
10
4
Net increase in loans
(63,540
(51,731
Purchases of premises and equipment
(1,353
(723
Proceeds from disposal of premises and equipment
Proceeds from sale of other real estate
887
58
Net cash used in investing activities
(45,532
(104,442
Financing activities:
Net increase in deposits
55,647
66,088
Net increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds purchased
1,357
25,599
Net (decrease) increase in other short-term borrowings
(326
585
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances
10,000
20,460
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances
(5
(2
Repayments of subordinated debentures
(30
Issuance of common stock for options and dividend reinvestment plan
442
1,060
48
98
Common stock repurchases
(79
(296
Cash dividends paid
(4,649
(4,589
Net cash provided by financing activities
62,405
108,973
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
42,396
6,646
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
32,424
27,113
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
74,820
33,759
Supplemental cash flow information:
Income tax payments
4,080
4,495
Cash paid for interest
10,036
12,995
Supplemental non-cash activity:
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned
1,364
60
For the six months ended June 30, 2010
Accumulated
Common stock
other
Number of
Additional
Retained
comprehensive
shares
Amount
paid-in capital
earnings
income
Total
Balance December 31, 2009
13,607
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax
1,687
Stock issued for stock options exercised and dividend reinvestment plan
149
461
610
Stock issued for non-vested restricted stock
54
961
(1,142
Cash dividends, $0.34 per share
(4,669
Shares repurchased or cancelled
(10
(34
(197
32
(199
Balance June 30, 2010
13,695
5
Three months ended
Six months ended
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale:
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period (net of tax of $598, ($58), $908 and ($451), respectively)
1,110
(108
(838
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Comprehensive income
6,666
4,180
12,224
8,187
6
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP) for complete financial statements. The consolidated financial statements of S.Y. Bancorp, Inc. (Bancorp) and its subsidiary reflect all adjustments (consisting only of adjustments of a normal recurring nature) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of S.Y. Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company (Bank). S.Y. Bancorp Capital Trust II is a Delaware statutory trust that is a wholly-owned unconsolidated finance subsidiary of S.Y. Bancorp, Inc. Significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
A description of other significant accounting policies is presented in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in S.Y. Bancorp, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior year financial statements to conform to current year classifications. Bancorp has evaluated subsequent events for recognition or disclosure up to the date on which financial statements were issued.
Interim results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year.
Critical Accounting Policies
Management has identified the accounting policy related to the allowance for loan losses as critical to the understanding of Bancorps results of operations and discussed this conclusion with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Since the application of this policy requires significant management assumptions and estimates, it could result in materially different amounts to be reported if conditions or underlying circumstances were to change. Assumptions include many factors such as changes in borrowers financial condition which can change quickly or historical loss ratios related to certain loan portfolios which may or may not be indicative of future losses. To the extent that managements assumptions prove incorrect, the results from operations could be materially affected by a higher or lower provision for loan losses. The accounting policy related to the allowance for loan losses is applicable to the commercial banking segment of Bancorp.
Additionally, management has identified the accounting policy related to accounting for income taxes as critical to the understanding of Bancorps results of operations and discussed this conclusion with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entitys financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in Bancorps financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences, including the effects of periodic IRS and state agency examinations, could materially impact Bancorps financial position and its results from operations.
7
(2) Securities
The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of securities available for sale follow:
June 30, 2010
Amortized
Unrealized
Securities available for sale
Cost
Gains
Losses
Fair Value
(in thousands)
Government sponsored enterprise obligations
102,084
3,098
105,182
Mortgage-backed securities
56,312
2,487
58,799
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
45,750
915
100
46,565
Trust preferred securities of financial institutions
1,250
65
1,185
Total securities available for sale
205,396
6,500
165
December 31, 2009
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government obligations
3,000
3,019
122,761
2,006
79
124,688
65,179
1,519
66,681
32,298
689
175
32,812
225
1,025
224,488
4,233
496
The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of securities held to maturity follow:
Fair
Securities held to maturity
Value
27
37
In addition to the available for sale and held to maturity portfolios, investment securities held by Bancorp include certain securities which are not readily marketable. This category includes holdings of Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (FHLB) stock which are required for borrowing availability, and are classified as restricted securities. Other securities consist of a Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) investment which matures in 2014, and is fully collateralized with a government agency security of similar duration. These securities are carried at cost as follows:
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
4,771
4,546
Other securities
1,001
Total Federal Home Loan Bank stock and other securities
9
A summary of securities as of June 30, 2010 based on contractual maturity is presented below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations.
Securities
Available for Sale
Held to Maturity
Amortized Cost
Due within one year
26,426
26,462
Due within one year through five years
80,001
82,438
Due within five years through ten years
39,043
40,419
24
Due after ten years
59,926
62,412
Securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, not recognized in income are as follows:
Less than 12 months
12 months or more
9,303
71
2,053
29
11,356
Total temporarily impaired securities
3,238
94
12,541
13,402
9,692
8,084
31,178
271
32,203
The investment portfolio includes a significant level of obligations of states and political subdivisions. The issuers of the bonds are generally school districts or essential-service public works projects. The bonds are primarily concentrated in Kentucky, Indiana and Ohio. Each of these securities has a rating of A or better by a recognized bond rating agency.
Unrealized losses on Bancorps investment securities portfolio have not been recognized in income because the securities are of high credit quality, the decline in fair values is largely due to changes in the prevailing interest rate and credit environment since the purchase date, management does not intend to sell the investments, and it is not likely that the Bancorp will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity. The fair value is expected to recover as the securities reach their maturity date and/or the interest rate and credit environment returns to conditions similar to when the securities were purchased. These investments consist of 22 and 14 separate investment positions as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 that are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired. Based on these detailed reviews, Bancorp has not recorded other-than-temporary losses on any securities held at June 30, 2010.
As of June 30, 2010, Bancorp had four securities with a total carrying value of $3,238,000 which had been impaired for 12 months or longer. Two of these are obligations of a large school district in Kentucky with a total amortized cost of $2,082,000 and an unrealized loss totaling $29,000 caused by interest rate changes and other market conditions. The remaining two are trust preferred securities with a total amortized cost of $1,250,000 and an unrealized loss totaling $65,000 caused by interest rate changes and other market conditions. As of June 30, 2010, one of the trust preferred securities has a credit rating below investment grade Caa1 by Moodys Investor Service. This security has an amortized cost of $1,000,000, a carrying value of $959,600, and an unrealized loss of $40,400. Management evaluates the impairment of securities on a quarterly basis, considering various factors including issuer financial condition, agency rating, payment prospects, impairment duration and general industry condition. Based on the evaluation as of June 30, 2010, management is of the opinion that none of the securities is other-than-temporarily impaired. Management does not intend to sell the investments, and it is not likely that Bancorp will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases, which may be maturity.
(3) Stock-Based Compensation
The fair value of all new and modified awards granted, net of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as compensation expense. These forfeiture estimates are based on historical experience.
Bancorp currently has one stock-based compensation plan. Initially, in the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, there were 735,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance of stock based awards. At Bancorps Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 21, 2010, shareholders approved a proposal to amend the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan to reserve an additional 700,000 shares of common stock for issuance under the plan. As of June 30, 2010, there were 763,680 shares available for future awards.
Bancorps 1995 Stock Incentive Plan expired in 2005; however, options granted under this plan expire as late as 2015. Options and stock appreciation rights (SARs) granted generally have been subject to a vesting schedule of 20% per year. Prior to 2009, those granted to certain executive officers vested six months after grant date. Restricted shares generally vest over three to five years, with limited exceptions of shorter vesting schedules due to anticipated retirement. All awards under both plans were granted at an exercise price equal to the market value of common stock at the time of grant and expire ten years after the grant date.
11
Bancorp recognized, within salaries and employee benefits in the consolidated statements of income, stock-based compensation expense as follows:
Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes
247,200
179,900
455,200
328,200
Deferred tax benefit
86,500
63,000
159,300
114,900
Reduction of net income
160,700
116,900
295,900
213,300
Bancorp expects to record an additional $498,000 of stock-based compensation expense in 2010. As of June 30, 2010, Bancorp has $2,862,000 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense that will be recorded as compensation expense over the next five years as awards vest. Bancorp received cash of $429,000 and $808,000 from the exercise of options during the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The fair value of Bancorps stock options and SARs is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, a leading formula for calculating the value of stock options. This model requires the input of subjective assumptions, changes to which can materially affect the fair value estimate. The fair value of restricted shares is determined by Bancorps closing stock price on the date of grant. The following assumptions were used in SAR/option valuations at the grant date in each year:
Dividend yield
2.18
%
2.11
Expected volatility
23.87
23.59
Risk free interest rate
3.57
3.11
Forfeitures
5.96
Expected life of options and SARs (in years)
7.6
7.7
The expected life of options is based on actual experience of past like-term awards. All outstanding options have a 10-year contractual term. Bancorp evaluated historical exercise and post-vesting termination behavior when determining the expected life of options and SARs.
The dividend yield and expected volatility are based on historical information corresponding to the expected life of awards granted. The expected volatility is the volatility of the underlying shares for the expected term on a monthly basis. The risk free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury issues with a remaining term equal to the expected life of the awards.
12
A summary of stock option and SARs activity and related information for the six months ended June 30, 2010 follows. The number of options and SARs and aggregate intrinsic value are stated in thousands.
Weighted
Average
Aggregate
Remaining
Options
Exercise
Intrinsic
Contractual
and SARs
Exercise Price
Price
Life
At December 31, 2009
Vested and exercisable
730
9.82-26.83
20.50
1,664
4.52
4.42
Unvested
276
20.90-26.83
23.81
5.41
7.93
Total outstanding
1,006
21.41
4.76
5.38
Granted
85
21.03
166
5.31
Exercised
(44
9.82-22.81
12.40
2.54
Forfeited
22.14-26.83
23.91
At June 30, 2010
763
21.33
1,811
4.73
4.38
274
21.03-26.83
22.85
231
5.36
8.23
1,037
21.73
2,042
4.90
5.40
Vested during quarter
The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised was calculated as the difference in the closing price of Bancorps common shares on the date of exercise and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of shares exercised.
The weighted average fair values of options and SARs granted in 2010 and 2009 were $5.31 and $5.36, respectively.
In the first quarter of 2010, Bancorp granted 84,558 SARs at the current market price of $21.03 and a fair value of $5.31. Also, in the first quarter of 2010, Bancorp granted 54,292 shares of common stock at the current market price of $21.03. No SARs or common stock grants were awarded in the second quarter of 2010.
13
(4) Allowance for Loan Losses and Impaired Loans
An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 follows (in thousands):
Beginning balance January 1,
15,381
Loans charged off
(2,560
(2,458
Recoveries
414
329
Ending balance June 30,
17,077
Information about impaired loans follows (in thousands):
Principal balance of impaired loans
13,187
11,208
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance
8,715
8,688
Amount of valuation allowance
1,685
1,676
Impaired loans with no valuation allowance
4,472
2,520
Average balance of impaired loans for the period
12,505
7,005
(5) Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
The Bank had outstanding borrowings of $70.5 million, at June 30, 2010, comprised of six separate advances as detailed in the table below (in thousands).
Type
Amortization
Maturity
Call Feature
Next Call Date
Fixed rate
None
December 2010
Quarterly
June 2010
May 2012
May 2010
April 2012
Non callable
April 2014
May 2014
448
15 Year
April 2024
For the first five advances, interest payments are due monthly, with principal due at maturity. For the sixth advance, principal and interest payments are due monthly based on a 15 year amortization schedule. The weighted average rate of these six advances was 3.33% at June 30, 2010. Advances from the FHLB are collateralized by certain commercial and residential real estate mortgage loans under a blanket mortgage collateral agreement and FHLB stock.
The Banks agreement with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (FHLB) enables the Bank to borrow up to an additional $129.8 million as of June 30, 2010 under terms to be established at the time of the advance. The Bank also has a standby letter of credit from the FHLB for $10 million outstanding at June 30, 2010. Under Kentucky law, customer cash balances in Investment Management and Trust accounts, may be retained as deposits in the Bank. Kentucky law requires these deposit accounts to be backed by some form of collateral above the $250,000 per account protection provided by the FDIC. The
14
standby letter of credit from the FHLB collateralizes these accounts beyond the FDIC protection as required by Kentucky law.
(6) Goodwill and Intangible Assets
US GAAP requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives be tested for impairment at least annually. Annual evaluations have resulted in no charges for impairment. Bancorp currently has goodwill from the acquisition of a bank in southern Indiana in the amount of $682,000. This goodwill is assigned to the commercial banking segment of Bancorp.
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) are amortized in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income, considering appropriate prepayment assumptions. MSRs are evaluated quarterly for impairment by comparing the carrying value to the fair value. The estimated fair values of MSRs at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $1,762,000 and $2,475,000, respectively. The total outstanding principal balances of loans serviced for others were $212,640,000 and $194,414,000 at June 30, 2010, and December 31, 2009 respectively. Changes in the net carrying amount of MSRs for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are shown in the following table.
Balance at beginning of period
1,616
426
Originations
257
633
(236
(95
Impairment reversal
176
Balance at June 30
1,637
1,140
(7) Defined Benefit Retirement Plan
The Bank sponsors an unfunded, non-qualified, defined benefit retirement plan for certain key officers. Benefits vest based on years of service. The actuarially determined pension costs are expensed and accrued over the service period, and benefits are paid from the Banks assets. The Bank maintains life insurance policies on certain current and former executives, the income from which will help to offset the cost of benefits. The net periodic benefits costs, which include interest cost and amortization of net losses, totaled $31,000 and $32,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the net periodic benefit costs totaled $62,000 and $64,000, respectively.
(8) Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
As of June 30, 2010, Bancorp had various commitments outstanding that arose in the normal course of business, including standby letters of credit and commitments to extend credit, which are properly not reflected in the financial statements. In managements opinion, commitments to extend credit of $360,328,000 including standby letters of credit of $16,673,000 represent normal banking transactions, and no significant losses are anticipated to result from these commitments as of June 30, 2010. Commitments to extend credit were $379,075,000, including letters of credit of $26,655,000, as of December 31, 2009. Bancorps exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these commitments is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. Bancorp uses the same credit and collateral policies in making commitments and conditional guarantees as for on-balance sheet instruments.
15
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Commitments to extend credit are mainly made up of commercial lines of credit, construction and development loans and home equity credit lines. Since some of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Bancorp evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a case by case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by Bancorp upon extension of credit, is based on managements credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, income producing commercial properties, residential properties and real estate under development.
Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written are conditional commitments issued by Bancorp to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements. Standby letters of credit generally have maturities of up to five years.
Bancorp has commercial customers who entered into interest rate swap agreements with another financial institution to manage their own interest rate risk. Bancorp assisted two customers by guaranteeing performance of the swaps with the other financial institutions. Accordingly, Bancorp entered into risk participation agreements as a guarantor. The agreement stipulates that, in the event of default by the Banks customer on the interest rate swap, Bancorp will reimburse a portion of the loss, if any, borne by the other financial institution. These interest rate swaps are normally collateralized generally with real property, inventories and equipment by the customer, which limits Bancorps credit risk associated with the agreements. The terms of the agreements range from 10 to 32 months. The maximum potential future payment guaranteed by Bancorp cannot be readily estimated, because it is dependent upon the fair value of the interest rate swaps at the time of default. If an event of default on all contracts had occurred at June 30, 2010, Bancorp would have been required to make payments of approximately $362,000. Management believes the unamortized fee income of $15,000 recorded in other liabilities materially approximates the fair value of these guarantees.
Bancorp has commercial customers who require international letters of credit for their business needs. Bancorp assisted several customers by guaranteeing performance of the letters of credit with a correspondent financial institution. Accordingly, Bancorp has entered into an agreement whereby Bancorp is ultimately liable for the repayment in the event of non-performance by our customer. The terms of the agreements range from 2 to 10 months. If an event of default on all contracts had occurred at June 30, 2010, Bancorp would have been required to make payments of approximately $2,673,000. These letters of credit are normally collateralized generally with inventories and receivables by the customer, which limits Bancorps credit risk associated with the agreements.
(9) Preferred Stock
At Bancorps 2003 annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholders approved an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to create a class of preferred stock and authorize 1,000,000 shares of this preferred stock with no par value. The relative rights, preferences and other terms of this stock or any series within the class will be determined by the Board of Directors prior to any issuance. Some of this preferred stock will be used in connection with a shareholders rights plan upon the occurrence of certain triggering events. None of this stock had been issued as of June 30, 2010.
(10) Net Income Per Share
The following table reflects, for the three ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, net income (the numerator) and average shares outstanding (the denominator) for the basic and diluted net income per share computations:
June 30
Net income, basic and diluted
Average shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive securities
84
151
Average shares outstanding including dilutive securities
Net income per share, basic
Net income per share, diluted
(11) Segments
The Banks, and thus Bancorps, principal activities include commercial banking and investment management and trust. Commercial banking provides a full range of loan and deposit products to individuals, consumers and businesses. Commercial banking also includes the Banks mortgage banking and securities brokerage activity. Investment management and trust provides wealth management services including investment management, trust and estate administration, retirement plan services and financial planning.
The financial information for each business segment reflects that which is specifically identifiable or allocated based on an internal allocation method. Principally, all of the net assets of Bancorp are involved in the commercial banking segment. Income taxes are allocated to the investment management and trust segment based on the marginal federal tax rate since all activity giving rise to the difference between marginal and effective tax rates occurs in the commercial banking segment. The measurement of the performance of the business segments is based on the management structure of the Bank and is not necessarily comparable with similar information for any other financial institution. The information presented is also not indicative of the segments operations, if they were independent entities.
Selected financial information by business segment for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 follows:
Three months
Six Months
ended June 30
Commercial banking
16,503
14,249
32,250
28,278
Investment management and trust
68
91
147
Provision for loan losses:
4,754
5,263
9,526
9,153
Non-interest expense:
12,519
12,327
24,516
23,074
1,925
1,703
3,743
3,225
Tax expense
1,455
3,490
3,063
473
408
995
838
Net income:
4,678
3,530
8,691
7,469
878
758
1,846
1,556
(12) Income Taxes
US GAAP provides guidance on financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken, or expected to be taken, in tax returns. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $230,000. If recognized, all of the tax benefits would increase net income, resulting in a decrease of the effective tax rate. The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to statutes of limitation, changes in managements judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examination, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions.
18
Bancorps policy is to report interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the amount accrued for the potential payment of interest and penalties was $20,000.
(13) Derivative Financial Instruments
Bancorp typically manages its interest rate risk without the use of hedging instruments, and currently does not have derivative financial instruments employed for any reason except for the accommodation of customers as described below.
Bancorp offers interest rate swaps to customers desiring long-term fixed rate lending whereby Bancorp receives interest at a fixed rate and pays interest at a variable rate. Simultaneously Bancorp enters into an interest rate swap agreement with a correspondent bank whereby Bancorp pays interest at a fixed rate and receives interest at a variable rate. Because of matching terms of offsetting contracts and the collateral provisions mitigating any non-performance risk, changes in fair value subsequent to initial recognition have an insignificant effect on earnings.
At June 30, 2010, Bancorps interest rate swaps are recognized as other assets and liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition at fair value. Bancorps derivative instruments have not been designated as hedging instruments. These undesignated derivative instruments are recognized on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value, with changes in fair value, due to changes in prevailing interest rates, recorded in other noninterest income.
The above interest rate swap agreements derive their value from underlying interest rates. These transactions involve both credit and market risk. The notional amounts are amounts on which calculations, payments, and the value of the derivative are based. Notional amounts do not represent direct credit exposures. Direct credit exposure is limited to the net difference between the calculated amounts to be received and paid, if any. Bancorp is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to these agreements. Bancorp controls the credit risk of its financial contracts through credit approvals, limits and monitoring procedures, and does not expect any counterparties to fail their obligations.
At June 30, 2010, two of the outstanding swap agreements have a forward-effective date in the fourth quarter of 2010. The remaining swap agreements had cash flow payments due in the second quarter of 2010. Exchanges of cash flows related to the interest rate swap agreements for the second quarter of 2010 were offsetting and therefore had no effect on Bancorps earnings or cash flows.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Bancorp had contracts to make payments at a variable rate determined by a specified index (1 month LIBOR) in exchange for receiving payments at a fixed rate. Correspondingly, at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Bancorp had contracts to make payments at a fixed rate in exchange for receiving payments at a variable rate determined by a specified index (1 month LIBOR). A summary of the contracts is as follows:
Receiving
Paying
(dollar amounts in thousands)
Notional amount
5,393
5,500
Weighted average maturity
8.6
9.1
Fair value
(332
(94
332
To reduce credit risk related to the use of derivative instruments, Bancorp obtains collateral. The amount and nature of the collateral obtained is based on Bancorps credit evaluation of the customer. In addition, per the terms of the agreement with the correspondent bank, Bancorp may be required to post collateral for swaps with negative fair values and vice versa.
(14) Fair Value Measurements
Bancorp adopted the provisions of the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements. This guidance is definitional and disclosure oriented and addresses how companies should approach measuring fair value when required by US GAAP; it does not create or modify any current US GAAP requirements to apply fair value accounting. The guidance prescribes various disclosures about financial statement categories and amounts which are measured at fair value, if such disclosures are not already specified elsewhere in US GAAP.
The authoritative guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between participants at the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a hierarchy to group assets and liabilities carried at fair value in three levels based upon the markets in which the assets and liabilities trade and the reliability of assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels are:
· Level 1 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.
· Level 2 Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
· Level 3 Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions would reflect internal estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques could include pricing models, discounted cash flows and other similar techniques.
Bancorps policy is to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs in fair value measurements. Where there exists limited or no observable market data, Bancorp uses its own estimates generally considering characteristics of the asset/liability, the current economic and competitive environment and other factors. For this reason, results cannot be determined with precision and may not be realized on an actual sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability.
Bancorps investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Other accounts including mortgage loans held for sale, mortgage servicing rights, impaired loans and other real estate owned may be recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis, generally in the application of lower of cost or market adjustments or write-downs of specific assets.
The portfolio of investment securities available for sale is comprised of debt securities of the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government-sponsored corporations, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of state and political subdivisions, and trust preferred securities of other banks. Certain trust preferred securities are priced using quoted prices of identical securities in an active market. These measurements are classified as Level 1 in the hierarchy above. All other securities are priced using standard industry models or matrices with various assumptions such as yield curves, volatility, prepayment speeds, default rates, time value, credit rating and market prices for the instruments. These assumptions are generally observable in the market place and can be derived from or supported by observable data. These measurements are classified as Level 2 in the hierarchy above.
Interest rate swaps are valued using primarily Level 2 inputs. Fair value measurements are obtained from an outside pricing service. Prices obtained are generally based on dealer quotes, benchmark forward yield curves, and other relevant observable market data. For purposes of potential valuation adjustments to derivative positions, Bancorp evaluates the credit risk of its counterparties as well as its own credit risk. To date, Bancorp has not realized any losses due to a counterpartys inability to perform and the change in value of derivative assets and liabilities attributable to credit risk was not significant during 2010.
Below are the carrying values of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands).
Fair Value at June 30, 2010
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Investment securities available for sale
Total investment securities available for sale
210,546
Interest rate swap
Total Assets
212,063
210,878
Liabilities
21
Fair value at December 31, 2009
227,200
228,319
227,294
Mortgage loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market value. The portfolio is comprised of residential real estate loans and fair value is based on specific prices of underlying contracts for sales to investors. These measurements are classified as Level 2. Because the fair value of the loans held for sale exceeded their carrying value, they are not included in the table for June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) are recorded at fair value upon capitalization, are amortized to correspond with estimated servicing income, and are periodically assessed for impairment based on fair value at the reporting date. Fair value is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value of estimated net servicing income. The model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income. These measurements are classified as Level 3. For the year ended December 31, 2009, the MSR valuation allowance reversals totaled $176,000. A corresponding increase of $176,000 was included in earnings for 2009. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 there was no valuation allowance for the mortgage servicing rights, as the fair value exceeded the cost. Accordingly, the MSRs are not included in the table for 2010 or 2009.
Bancorps investment in a bank in one of Bancorps expansion markets, included in other assets, is recorded as an equity-method investment. As of June 30, 2010, the carrying value of the investment is $520,000, and is not included in the table below as the fair value of the investment exceeds the cost. Because Bancorp evaluated this investment based on a quoted price for this security in a market that is generally not active, the measurement was classified as Level 2.
22
Other real estate owned, which is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, is periodically assessed for impairment based on fair value at the reporting date. Fair value is determined from external appraisals using judgments and estimates of external professionals. Many of these inputs are not observable and, accordingly, these measurements are classified as Level 3. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying value of other real estate owned was $1,978,000 and $1,556,000, respectively. Other real estate owned is not included in either table below, as the fair value of the properties exceeded their carrying value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Below are the carrying values of assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis (in thousands).
Losses for 6 month
Fair value at June 30, 2010
period ended
Impaired loans
7,030
(755
June 30, 2009
7,012
(388
23
(15) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair values of financial instruments are as follows:
CarryingAmount
Financial assets
Cash and short-term investments
7,268
13,268
211,756
211,758
228,260
228,262
Loans, net
1,477,485
1,440,374
Financial liabilities
1,488,255
1,429,863
Short-term borrowings
73,679
74,000
72,648
72,765
Long-term borrowings
111,348
113,263
101,383
109,959
Off balance sheet financial instruments
Commitments to extend credit
Standby letters of credit
(250
(400
Management used the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate the value.
Cash, Short-term investments, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, Accrued interest receivable/payable and Short-term borrowings
For these short-term instruments, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
For securities, fair value equals quoted market price, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities or dealer quotes.
The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is determined by market quotes for each loan based on loan type, term, rate and size.
The fair value of loans is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities (e.g. entrance price).
Interest rate swaps
Fair value measurements are obtained from an outside pricing service. Prices obtained are generally based on dealer quotes, benchmark forward yield curves, and other relevant observable market data.
The fair value of demand deposits, savings accounts, and certain money market deposits is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair value of fixed-rate certificates of deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
The fair value of long-term borrowings is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using estimates of the current market rate for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities.
Commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit
The fair values of commitments to extend credit are estimated using fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements and the creditworthiness of the customers. The fair values of standby letters of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.
Limitations
The fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instruments. Because no market exists for a significant portion of Bancorps financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Therefore, the calculated fair value estimates in many instances cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realizable in a current sale of the instrument. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This item discusses the results of operations for S.Y. Bancorp, Inc. (Bancorp or Company), and its subsidiary, Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company (Bank) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and compares these periods with the same periods of the previous year. Unless otherwise indicated, all references in this discussion to the Bank include Bancorp. In addition, the discussion describes the significant changes in the financial condition of Bancorp and the Bank that have occurred during the first six months of 2010 compared to
the year ended December 31, 2009. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes presented in Part 1, Item 1 of this report.
This report contains forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act that involve risks and uncertainties. Although Bancorp believes the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements contained herein are reasonable, any of these assumptions could be inaccurate. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from results discussed in forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to the following: economic conditions both generally and more specifically in the markets in which Bancorp and the Bank operate; competition for Bancorps customers from other providers of financial services; government legislation and regulation which change from time to time and over which Bancorp has no control; changes in interest rates; material unforeseen changes in liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of Bancorps customers; and other risks detailed in Bancorps filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond the control of Bancorp.
Overview of 2010 through June 30
Bancorp completed the second quarter and first six months of 2010 with more net income than the comparable periods of 2009 by 30% and 17%, respectively. The increases are due to loan growth, an improvement in net interest margin and increasing income from investment management and trust services, bankcard transaction revenue, and brokerage income, somewhat offset by a higher provision for loan losses and increasing non-interest expenses. Diluted earnings per share for the second quarter and first six months of 2010 increased 29.0% and 16.7% respectively.
As is the case with most banks, the primary source of Bancorps revenue is net interest income and fees from various financial services provided to customers. Net interest income is the difference between interest income earned on loans, investment securities and other interest earning assets less interest expense on deposit accounts and other interest bearing liabilities. Loan volume and the interest rates earned on those loans are critical to overall profitability. Similarly deposit volume is crucial to funding loans and rates paid on deposits directly impact profitability. Business volumes are influenced by overall economic factors including market interest rates, business spending, consumer confidence and competitive conditions within the marketplace.
Year-over-year total loans increased $79 million or 6%, and this was the driving force for growth in interest income. Increased loan volume more than offset the negative effect of declining interest rates over the past year. Despite deposit growth to support loan growth, interest expense declined due to lower funding costs on deposits and borrowings. The average rate earned on assets decreased in the first six months of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 as the rates earned on loans and investments declined. Rates paid on liabilities decreased more than rates earned on assets, contributing to an increased net interest spread and net interest margin compared to the first six months of 2009.
Distinguishing Bancorp from other similarly sized community banks is its diverse revenue stream, and non-interest income continued to be a key contributor to earnings in the first six months of 2010. Total non-interest income increased 10% in the first six months of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009. The increase is due largely to increased income from investment management and trust services, as well as realized and unrealized gains on an investment in a domestic private investment fund. Income from investment management and trust services, which constitutes the single largest component of non-interest income increased 19% for the first six months of 2010 due to higher asset values and a modest increase in non-recurring estate fees. Revenue is earned as a percentage of the market value of the assets under management and therefore is tied directly to the broader markets overall performance. In addition, Bancorp experienced increases in service charges on deposit accounts, bankcard transaction income, and brokerage income. Partially offsetting the increases were decreases
26
in gains on sales of mortgage loans held for sale as the volume of transactions in that area has declined from an all-time high in 2009.
Higher non-interest expense for the first six months of 2010 was reflected in salaries and benefits, occupancy expenses, and data processing, partially offset by decreases on state bank taxes and FDIC insurance expense. Bancorps second quarter efficiency ratio was 58.10% compared with 57.31% in the first quarter of 2010 and 61.96% in the second quarter last year.
Also impacting 2010 results, Bancorps provision for loan losses was $5,079,000 for the first six months of 2010 compared to $3,825,000 for the same period in 2009. The increased provision results from a consistent allowance methodology that is driven by risk ratings. Management continues to be concerned that the current economic downturn and prospects for a slow recovery will continue to take a toll on Bancorps loan portfolio and underlying collateral values, extending its impact to lending relationships that have to date not been identified. Bancorps allowance for loan losses was 1.55% of total loans at June 30, 2010, compared with 1.39% of total loans at December 31, 2009, and 1.22% at June 30, 2009.
Tangible common equity (TCE), a non-GAAP measure, is a measure of a companys capital which is useful in evaluating the quality and adequacy of capital. The ratio of tangible common equity to total tangible assets was 8.68% as of June 30, 2010, compared to 8.54% at December 31, 2009. See the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section for details on reconcilement to US GAAP measures.
The following sections provide more details on subjects presented in this overview.
a) Results Of Operations
Net income of $5,556,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased $1,268,000, or 29.6%, from $4,288,000 for the comparable 2009 period. Basic net income per share was $0.41 for the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 28.1% from the $0.32 for the second quarter of 2009. Net income per share on a diluted basis was $0.40 for the second quarter of 2010, compared to $0.31 for the second quarter of 2009; a 29.0% increase. Annualized return on average assets and annualized return on average stockholders equity were 1.23% and 13.93%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2010, compared to 1.01% and 11.53%, respectively, for the same period in 2009.
Net income of $10,537,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased $1,512,000, or 16.8%, from $9,025,000 for the comparable 2009 period. Basic net income per share was $0.77 for the first six months of 2010, compared to $0.67 for the same period of 2009. Net income per share on a diluted basis was $0.77 for the first six months of 2010 compared to $0.66 for the same period of 2009. Annualized return on average assets and annualized return on average stockholders equity were 1.18% and 13.35%, respectively, for the first six months of 2010, compared to 1.10% and 12.33%, respectively, for the same period in 2009.
Net Interest Income
The following tables present the average balance sheets for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 along with the related calculation of tax-equivalent net interest income, net interest margin and net interest spread for the related periods. See the notes following the tables for further explanation.
Average Balances and Interest Rates Taxable Equivalent Basis
Three months ended June 30
(Dollars in thousands)
Balances
Interest
Rate
Earning assets:
32,260
0.24
30,751
0.22
3,966
7,953
5.30
Securities:
Taxable
167,618
3.16
137,466
1,137
3.32
Tax-exempt
33,388
28,010
406
5.81
FHLB stock
3.75
5,096
50
3.94
Loans, net of unearned income
1,460,147
19,918
5.47
1,390,379
19,346
5.58
Total earning assets
1,703,151
21,774
5.13
1,599,655
21,061
5.28
22,592
16,691
1,680,559
1,582,964
Non-earning assets:
28,819
25,395
Premises and equipment
28,117
27,507
Accrued interest receivable and other assets
75,807
58,642
1,813,302
1,694,508
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing demand deposits
249,326
117
0.19
226,177
121
0.21
Savings deposits
66,165
41
0.25
52,800
0.14
Money market deposits
430,963
805
0.75
319,739
534
Time deposits
469,642
2,431
2.08
517,486
3,991
3.09
51,028
0.64
43,804
0.45
Fed funds purchased and other short term borrowings
18,498
0.17
28,082
0.23
FHLB advances
65,064
3.43
84,085
4.14
Long-term debt
8.45
8.65
Total interest bearing liabilities
1,391,586
1.41
1,313,103
1.98
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
225,769
195,128
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities
35,964
37,164
1,653,319
1,545,395
Stockholders equity
159,983
149,113
16,873
14,581
Net interest spread
3.72
3.30
Net interest margin
3.97
3.66
28
Six months ended June 30
43,233
17,348
4,388
6,947
5.25
167,065
2,671
3.22
133,429
2,509
3.79
29,881
5.15
27,639
798
5.82
5,661
109
3.88
4,722
99
4.23
1,449,203
39,302
1,375,964
38,234
5.60
1,699,431
43,008
5.10
1,566,049
41,841
5.39
21,727
16,249
1,677,704
1,549,800
27,354
25,441
28,028
27,652
71,910
58,315
1,804,996
1,661,208
243,616
230
220,274
218
0.20
64,159
83
0.26
49,595
0.10
416,125
1,508
0.73
321,831
1,120
0.70
489,895
5,255
2.16
506,582
7,974
3.17
53,225
48,182
Fed funds purchased and other
short term borrowings
18,727
0.18
22,976
0.33
62,770
3.47
77,117
4.31
40,902
8.49
40,931
8.66
Total interest
bearing liabilities
1,389,419
1.46
1,287,488
2.02
220,181
189,399
36,274
36,690
1,645,874
1,513,577
159,122
147,631
32,944
28,952
3.64
3.37
3.91
3.73
Notes to the average balance and interest rate tables:
· Net interest income, the most significant component of the Banks earnings is total interest income less total interest expense. The level of net interest income is determined by the mix and volume of interest earning assets, interest bearing deposits and borrowed funds, and changes in interest rates.
· Net interest spread is the difference between the taxable equivalent rate earned on interest earning assets less the rate expensed on interest bearing liabilities.
· Net interest margin represents net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis as a percentage of average interest earning assets. Net interest margin is affected by both the interest rate spread and the level of non-interest bearing sources of funds, primarily consisting of demand deposits and stockholders equity.
· Interest income on a fully tax equivalent basis includes the additional amount of interest income that would have been earned if investments in certain tax-exempt interest earning assets had been made in assets subject to federal taxes yielding the same after-tax income. Interest income on municipal securities and loans have been calculated on a fully tax equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 35%. The approximate tax equivalent adjustments to interest income were $326,000 and $264,000, respectively, for the three month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and $603,000 and $527,000, respectively, for the six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Fully taxable equivalent net interest income of $16,873,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased $2,292,000, or 15.7%, from $14,581,000 when compared to the same period last year. Net interest spread and net interest margin were 3.72% and 3.97%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2010 and 3.30% and 3.66%, respectively, for the second quarter of 2009.
Fully taxable equivalent net interest income of $32,944,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased $3,992,000, or 13.8%, from $28,952,000 when compared to the same period last year. Net interest spread and net interest margin were 3.64% and 3.91%, respectively, for the first six months of 2010 and 3.37% and 3.73%, respectively, for the first six months of 2009.
Approximately 40% of the Banks loans are variable rate and most of these loans are indexed to the Banks prime rate and may reprice as the prime rate changes. However, approximately $440 million, or 72% of variable rate loans, have reached their contractual floor of 4% or higher. Approximately $128 million or 21% of variable rate loans have no contractual floor; however, the Bank intends to establish floors whenever possible upon renewal of the loans. The remaining $45 million of variable rate loans, or 7% of variable rate loans, have contractual floors below 4%. The Banks variable rate loans are primarily comprised of commercial lines of credit and real estate loans. At inception, most of the Banks fixed rate loans are priced in relation to the five year Treasury bond and the persistence of low short term rates has held those rates low.
Average earning assets increased $133.4 million or 8.5%, to $1.699 billion for the first six months of 2010 compared to 2009, reflecting growth in the loan portfolio and investment securities. Average interest bearing liabilities increased $101.9 million, or 7.9%, to $1.389 billion for the first six months of 2010 compared to 2009 primarily due to increases in interest bearing demand and money market deposits, partially offset by decreases in certificates of deposits and FHLB borrowings.
30
Asset/Liability Management and Interest Rate Risk
Managing interest rate risk is fundamental for the financial services industry. The primary objective of interest rate risk management is to neutralize effects of interest rate changes on net income. Bank management evaluates interest rate sensitivity while attempting to optimize net interest income within the constraints of prudent capital adequacy, liquidity needs, market opportunities and customer requirements.
Interest Rate Simulation Sensitivity Analysis
Bancorp uses an earnings simulation model to estimate and evaluate the impact of changing interest rates on earnings. The simulation model is designed to reflect the dynamics of interest earning assets, interest bearing liabilities and off-balance sheet financial instruments. By estimating the effects of interest rate increases and decreases, the model can reveal approximate interest rate risk exposure. The simulation model is used by management to gauge approximate results given a specific change in interest rates at a given point in time. The model is therefore a tool to indicate earnings trends in given interest rate scenarios and does not indicate actual expected results. The June 30, 2010 simulation analysis, which shows very little interest rate sensitivity, indicates that an increase in interest rates of 100 to 200 basis points would have a slightly negative effect on net interest income, and a decrease of 100 to 200 basis points in interest rates would have a slightly positive impact. These estimates are summarized below.
Net interestincome change
Increase 200bp
(2.44
)%
Increase 100bp
(2.83
Decrease 100bp
Decrease 200bp
2.48
Approximately 30% of total loans are indexed to the prime rate, and have floors of 4% or higher. Since the prime rate is currently 3.25%, rates would have to increase more than 75 bp before the rates on such loans will increase. This effect, captured in our simulation analysis above, slightly offsets the normal positive impact of rising rates. Analysis of rates increasing more than 400 bp indicates a positive effect on net interest income.
The scenario of rates decreasing 200 bp is not reasonably possible given current low rates for short-term instruments and most deposits.
Undesignated derivative instruments described in Note 13 are recognized on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value, with changes in fair value, due to changes in prevailing interest rates, recorded in other noninterest income. Because of matching terms of offsetting contracts, in addition to collateral provisions which mitigate the impact of non-performance risk, changes in fair value subsequent to initial recognition have a minimal effect on earnings, and are therefore not included in the simulation analysis results above.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses increased $1,254,000 for the first six months of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 in response to Bancorps assessment of risk in the loan portfolio. The provision for loan losses is calculated after considering credit quality factors, and ultimately relies on an overall internal analysis of the risk in the loan portfolio. Bancorp intends to continue with its historically conservative stance toward credit quality, remaining cautious in assessing the potential risk in the loan portfolio. Management has established loan grading procedures which result in specific allowance allocations for any
31
estimated inherent risk of loss. For all loans graded, but not individually reviewed, a general allowance allocation is computed using factors typically developed over time based on actual loss experience. The specific and general allocations plus consideration of qualitative factors represent managements best estimate of probable losses contained in the loan portfolio at the evaluation date. Although the allowance for loan losses is comprised of specific and general allocations the entire allowance is available to absorb any credit losses. Based on this detailed analysis of credit risk, management considers the allowance for loan losses adequate to cover probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio at June 30, 2010.
An analysis of the changes in the allowance for loan losses and selected ratios for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 follows:
Balance at the beginning of the period
21,811
16,208
Loan charge-offs, net of recoveries
(1,262
(1,331
(2,146
(2,129
Balance at the end of the period
Average loans, net of unearned income
Provision for loan losses to average loans (1)
0.16
0.35
0.28
Net loan charge-offs to average loans (1)
0.09
0.15
Allowance for loan losses to average loans
1.57
1.23
1.58
1.24
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans
1.55
1.22
Allowance to nonperforming loans
166.13
193.62
(1) Amounts not annualized
An analysis of net charge-offs by loan category for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 follows:
Three Months
Ended June 30
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries)
Commercial and industrial
658
199
786
415
Construction and development
(1
234
298
Real estate mortgage - commercial investment
195
55
Real estate mortgage - owner occupied commercial
95
593
235
Real estate mortgage - 1-4 family residential
115
286
244
361
Home equity
89
46
Consumer
111
425
Total net loan charge-offs
1,262
1,331
2,146
2,129
Non-interest Income and Expenses
The following table sets forth the major components of non-interest income and expenses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Six months
Total non-interest income decreased $78,000, or 1.0%, for the second quarter of 2010 and increased $1,394,000, or 9.5% for the first six months of 2010, compared to the same periods in 2009.
Investment management and trust services income increased $431,000, or 15.4%, in the second quarter of 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to the impact of an increased market value of assets under management and a modest increase in executor fees. For the first six months of 2010, investment management and trust services income increased $1,021,000, or 18.7%, compared to 2009. Most fees earned for managing accounts are based on a percentage of market value on a monthly basis. Growth in assets from net new accounts and improving broader markets has resulted in an increase in investment management fees. Trust assets under management at June 30, 2010 were $1.50 billion, compared to $1.38 billion at June 30, 2009.
Service charges on deposit accounts increased $81,000, or 4.0%, in the second quarter of 2010, and $154,000, or 4.0%, for the first six months of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009. Service charge income is driven by transaction volume in deposit accounts, which can fluctuate throughout the year. Recent legislation requires that our customers opt in to access their overdraft protection beginning in the third quarter of 2010. While it is difficult to predict the impact of this change, management believes this requirement will result in some decline in service charge income in the second half of 2010.
33
Bankcard transaction revenue increased $116,000, or 15.5%, in the second quarter of 2010, and increased $208,000, or 14.8%, for the first six months of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009. Primarily representing income the Bank derives from customers use of debit cards, results for the first six months of 2010 compared favorably to the same period in 2009 as bankcard transaction volume continues to increase. To earn higher interchange fees, Bancorp encourages its customers to process debit card transactions as signature-based transactions and has a rewards program to help with this effort. The upcoming overhaul of financial regulations may negatively impact this source of income. Approximately 80% of this revenue is interchange income based on rates set by service providers in a competitive market. In the future, this rate may be set by the Federal Reserve Board.
The Banks mortgage banking division originates residential mortgage loans to be sold in the secondary market. Interest rates on the loans sold are locked with the borrower and investor prior to closing the loans, thus Bancorp bears no interest rate risk related to these loans. The division offers conventional, VA and FHA financing, for purchases and refinances, as well as programs for low-income first time home buyers. The mortgage banking division also offers home equity conversion mortgages or reverse mortgages insured by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). These HUD loans provide homeowners 62 years of age or older a vehicle for converting equity in their homes to cash. Gains on sales of mortgage loans increased $1,000, or 0.2%, in the second quarter of 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, gains on the sale of mortgage loans decreased 12.0% to $830,000 from $943,000 in 2009. Interest rates on mortgage loans directly impact the volume of business transacted by the mortgage banking division. Prevailing mortgage interest rates fell substantially in late 2008 and have remained at attractive levels through 2009 and 2010 helping contribute to a solid loan volume mostly refinance activity. Also, the well-publicized availability of first-time homebuyer tax credits contributed to an increase in purchase activity in late 2009 and 2010. Volume reached an all-time high in 2009, and has declined in 2010 as many homeowners have already taken advantage of their refinance opportunities.
Brokerage commissions and fees increased $66,000, or 15.1%, in the second quarter of 2010, and increased 137,000 or 16.7% for the first six months of 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009. These increases corresponded to higher overall brokerage volume, as retail investors exhibited increased confidence in the overall market and the economic outlook.
Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI) income totaled $248,000 and $245,000 for the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively, and totaled $491,000 and $488,000 for the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. Bancorp purchases life insurance policies on the lives of certain officers and is the owner and beneficiary of the policies. Bancorp invests in these policies, known as BOLI, to provide an efficient form of funding for long-term retirement and other employee benefits costs.
Other non-interest income decreased $776,000, or 57.4%, in the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to a decrease of $510,000 in the value of the domestic private equity fund, a decrease of $143,000 in fees related to mortgage banking, such as title and application income, and a variety of other factors, none of which is individually significant. Other non-interest income decreased $16,000, or 1.0%, in the first six months of 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to a decrease of $144,000 in fees related to mortgage banking, such as title and application income, and a variety of other factors, none of which is individually significant, partially offset by an increase of $227,000 in the value of the domestic private investment fund.
Total non-interest expenses increased $414,000, or 3.0%, for the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 and $1,960,000, or 7.5%, for the first six months of 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009.
34
Salaries and employee benefits increased $650,000, or 8.5%, for the second quarter of 2010, and $1,339,000, or 8.9% for the first six months of 2010, as compared to the same periods of 2009, largely due to increases in salaries, bonus accruals and health insurance expense. The Bank had 474 and 457 full time equivalent employees as of June 30, 2010 and 2009; the expansion in Cincinnati contributed to the overall increase.
Net occupancy expense increased $283,000, or 27.9%, in the second quarter of 2010, and $551,000, or 27.3% in the first six months of 2010, as compared to the same periods of 2009, due to an increase in rent expense, some of which was a one-time charge to reflect the impact of leases with escalation clauses. Other contributing factors were the addition of a new branch in the Cincinnati market, along with increases in utilities and property taxes. Data processing expense increased $74,000 or 5.9% for the second quarter of 2010, and $180,000 or 7.9% for the first six months of 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to trust data processing expenses related to tax document preparation. Furniture and equipment expense increased $14,000 or 4.6% for the second quarter of 2010, and $36,000 or 6.0% for the first six months of 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009. This fluctuation relates to a variety of factors, none of which is individually significant.
FDIC insurance expense declined $714,000, or 57.3%, for the second quarter of 2010, and $665,000 or 39.9% for the first six months of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009. The decrease is due to a $786,000 special assessment recorded in the second quarter of 2009.
Other non-interest expenses increased $107,000 or 4.2% in the second quarter of 2010, and $519,000 or 11.1% in the first six months of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009. Included in this category are amortization expenses related to MSRs. Mortgage volume increased the amount of MSRs over 2009 and 2010, resulting in a corresponding increase of MSR amortization of $296,000 for the first six months of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009, partially offset by an impairment reversal of $159,000 in the first quarter, and $20,000 in the second quarter of 2009. The remaining year-to-date increases in other non-interest expenses are related to an increase of $226,000 in legal and professional fees, partially offset by a decrease of state bank taxes totaling $120,000, and a variety of factors including advertising, printing, mail and telecommunications, none of which is individually significant.
Income Taxes
In the second quarter of 2010, Bancorp recorded income tax expense of $2,149,000, compared to $1,863,000 for the same period in 2009. The effective rate for the three month period was 27.9% in 2010 and 30.3% in 2009. Bancorp recorded income tax expense of $4,485,000 for the first six months of 2010, compared to $3,901,000 for the same period in 2009. The effective rate for the six month period was 29.9% in 2010 and 30.2% in 2009. The decrease in the 2010 effective tax rate was primarily due to New Market and historic tax credits arising from Bancorps investment in a Louisville revitalization project in the second quarter of 2010.
Commitments
Bancorp utilizes a variety of financial instruments in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. A discussion of Bancorps commitments is included in Note 8.
Other commitments discussed in Bancorps Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, have not materially changed since that report was filed, relative to qualitative and quantitative disclosures of fixed and determinable contractual obligations.
b) Financial Condition
Balance Sheet
Total assets increased $68.0 million, or 3.8%, from $1.791 billion on December 31, 2009 to $1.859 billion on June 30, 2010. The most significant contributor of the increase in assets was loans, which increased $41.8 million in the first six months while investment securities decreased $16.5 million as a result of maturing short-term securities. Federal funds sold increased $36.0 million from the end of 2009. In addition to the loan growth represented on the consolidated balance sheet, total loans actually grew by an additional $9.1 million. This growth was offset by the decrease participation loans classified as secured borrowings noted in the Elements of the Loan Portfolio section below. Other assets increased $8.6 million, or 22.9%, largely due to Bancorps investment in a downtown revitalization project in the second quarter of 2010, which provides new market and historic tax credits.
Total liabilities increased $59.6 million, or 3.6%, from December 31, 2009 to $1.697 billion on June 30, 2010. The most significant component of the increase was in deposits of $55.6 million or 3.9% in support of loan growth. Securities sold under agreement to repurchase increased $2.4 million or 4.8%, while federal funds purchased decreased $1.1 million or 5.5%. Other short-term borrowings decreased $326 thousand or 18.0%. Other liabilities decreased $7.1 million or 15.7% as a result of a decrease in secured borrowings as noted in the Elements of the Loan Portfolio section below.
Elements of Loan Portfolio
The following table sets forth the major classifications of the loan portfolio.
Loans by Type
315,462
336,889
182,436
204,653
337,830
326,421
304,540
230,001
161,466
147,342
Home equity - first lien
41,043
41,644
Home equity - junior lien
98,119
108,398
36,408
40,114
Total loans
During 2010 Bancorp reviewed and standardized classifications of loan types. It was not feasible to obtain comparable amounts for reclassification of prior period presentation.
Bancorp enters into loan participation agreements with correspondent banks in the ordinary course of business to diversify credit risk. For certain participation loans, Bancorp has retained effective control of the loans, typically by restricting the participating institutions from pledging or selling their share of the loan without permission from Bancorp. US GAAP requires these loans to be recorded as secured borrowings. These loans are included in the loan totals above, and a corresponding liability is recorded in other liabilities. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the total loans of this nature were $25,452,000 and $34,599,000 respectively. A corresponding decrease of $9,147,000 is reflected in other liabilities.
36
Interest Reserves for Construction Loans
The establishment of interest reserves for construction and development loans is an established banking practice, but the handling of such interest reserves varies widely within the industry. Many of Bancorps construction and development loans provide for the use of interest reserves, and based upon its knowledge of general industry practices, Bancorp believes that its practices related to such interest reserves are appropriate and conservative. When Bancorp underwrites construction and development loans, it considers the expected total project costs, including hard costs such as land, site work and construction costs and soft costs such as architectural and engineering fees, closing costs, leasing commissions and construction period interest. Based on the total project costs and other factors, Bancorp determines the required borrower cash equity contribution and the maximum amount Bancorp is willing to loan. In the vast majority of cases, Bancorp requires that all of the borrowers cash equity contribution be contributed prior to any material loan advances. This ensures that the borrowers cash equity required to complete the project will in fact be available for such purposes. As a result of this practice, the borrowers cash equity typically goes toward the purchase of the land and early stage hard and soft costs. This results in Bancorp funding the loan later as the project progresses, and accordingly Bancorp typically funds the majority of the budgeted construction period interest through loan advances. Bancorp monitors budgeted interest reserves and does not allow funds allocated to other items to be directed to interest without realized cost savings. Bancorp also looks to liquid guarantors who are able to make up a liquidity shortfall if required. The maximum committed balance of all construction and development loans which provide for the use of interest reserves at June 30, 2010 was approximately $70.0 million, of which $41.3 million was outstanding at June 30, 2010 and $28.7 million remained to be advanced. Bancorp typically underwrites these construction loans with loan to value ratios remaining within supervisory limits.
Non-performing Loans and Assets
Non-performing loans, which include non-accrual loans of $9,640,000, loans past due over 90 days and still accruing of $616,000, and loans accounted for as troubled debt restructuring of $3,548,000, totaled $13,804,000 at June 30, 2010. Non-performing loans were $12,101,000 at December 31, 2009 including $893,000 of loans past due over 90 days and still accruing and loans accounted for as troubled debt restructuring of $753,000. The increase reflected ongoing economic pressures as the recession continued and affected more borrowers. All loans past due over 90 days and still accruing are well-collateralized and are in the process of collection. Non-performing loans represent 0.93% of total loans at June 30, 2010 compared to 0.84% at December 31, 2009. As noted in the Provision for Loan Losses section of this report, non-performing loans are analyzed in managements evaluation of the allowance and provision for loan losses.
Information summarizing non-performing assets, including non-accrual loans follows:
Non-accrual loans
9,640
10,455
Troubled debt restructuring
3,548
753
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing
616
893
Non-performing loans
13,804
12,101
Foreclosed real estate
1,978
Other foreclosed property
Non-performing assets
15,842
13,717
Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans
0.93
0.84
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets
0.85
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans
The increase in non-performing assets is largely due to the increase in one troubled debt restructuring, as well as other real estate owned. The addition of $2.8 million to troubled debt restructuring is confined to one borrower. Management believes it is in the best interest of the Bank to grant concessions to the customer and allow the customer adequate time to sell the property securing the loan and repay the loan. Because of the relatively low level of non-performing assets as compared to peers, Bancorp thus far has been able to approach loan workouts and collateral sales in an orderly fashion to minimize losses. Should market conditions worsen and non-performing loans spike, this flexibility may be reduced, and management may need to liquidate problem loans more rapidly, thus increasing the possibility of larger losses.
The following table sets forth the major classifications of non-accrual loans:
Non-accrual loans by type
217
3,839
4,246
2,344
2,024
2,122
1,613
1,256
545
453
The decrease in non-accrual loans reflects charge-offs of certain non-accrual loans. Bancorp has five borrowers, all in our primary market, who account for $6,165,000 or 64% of total non-accrual loans. Each of these loans is secured by commercial or residential real estate, and at June 30, 2010 there was a total specific allocation in the allowance for loan losses totaling $575,000, representing managements estimate of credit loss exposure.
Effects of Declines in Real Estate Collateral Values
Despite the fact that Bancorps principal market, Louisville, has only experienced a 2.3% decline in home prices since 2008 (Source: Federal Housing Finance Agency), further declines in collateral values, including commercial properties, may indirectly impact Bancorps ability to collect on certain real estate loans when borrowers are dependent on the values of the real estate as a source of cash flow. As borrowers experience difficulty, Bancorp evaluates their cash flow as well as the collateral value to determine prospects for collection. On an individual basis, loans are evaluated for changes in risk ratings, thereby affecting the provision and allowance for loan losses. Home equity loans are typically underwritten with consideration of the borrowers overall financial strength, without reliance on the value of the collateral as a primary repayment source. Bancorp requires appraisals on real estate at application and assesses the transaction and market conditions to determine if updates are needed at renewal. Additionally, Bancorp typically evaluates the collateral condition and value upon classification as an impaired loan and upon foreclosure. Due to the above factors, the effects of declines in real estate collateral value have been considered in the allowance for loan losses.
c) Liquidity
The role of liquidity is to ensure that funds are available to meet depositors withdrawals and borrowers demands to fund credit commitments. This is accomplished by balancing changes in demand for funds with changes in the supply of those funds. Liquidity is provided by short-term liquid assets that can be converted to cash, investment securities available for sale, various lines of credit available to Bancorp, and the ability to attract funds from external sources, principally deposits. Management has maintained a significantly higher liquidity position in 2009 and 2010, which management considers prudent given the current operating environment. Management believes it has the ability to increase deposits at any time by offering rates slightly higher than the market rate.
39
Bancorps most liquid assets are comprised of available for sale marketable investment securities, and federal funds sold. Federal funds sold totaled $42.6 million at June 30, 2010. These investments normally have overnight maturities and are used for general daily liquidity purposes. The fair value of the available for sale investment portfolio was $211.7 million at June 30, 2010, and included an unrealized net gain of $6.3 million. The portfolio includes maturities of approximately $58.5 million over the next twelve months, which, combined with federal funds sold, offer substantial resources to meet either new loan demand or reductions in Bancorps deposit funding base. Bancorp pledges portions of its investment securities portfolio to secure public fund deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase. At June 30, 2010, total investment securities pledged for these purposes comprised 38% of the available for sale investment portfolio, leaving $130.6 million of unpledged securities.
Bancorp has a large base of core customer deposits, defined as demand, savings, and money market deposit accounts. At June 30, 2010, such deposits totaled $1.017 billion and represented 69% of Bancorps total deposits. Because these core deposits are less volatile and are often tied to other products of Bancorp through long lasting relationships they do not put heavy pressure on liquidity. As of June 30, 2010, Bancorp had only $20.4 million or 1.4% of total deposits, in brokered deposits, which are entirely comprised of Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARs) deposits, a program which allows Bancorp to accept customer deposits in excess of FDIC limits through reciprocal agreements with other network participating banks in order to offer FDIC insurance up to as much as $50 million in deposits.
With regard to credit available to Bancorp, the Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (FHLB). As a member, the Bank has access to credit products of the FHLB. As of June 30, 2010, the Banks additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB was approximately $129.8 million. Additionally, the Bank had federal funds borrowing lines with correspondent banks totaling $105 million.
Bancorps liquidity depends primarily on the dividends paid to it as the sole shareholder of the Bank. Bancorp had sufficient cash on hand from its 2008 trust preferred securities offering that it was not necessary for the Bank to fund quarterly cash dividends or quarterly interest payments on the trust preferred securities. At June 30, 2010, the Bank may pay up to $7.3 million in dividends to Bancorp without regulatory approval subject to the ongoing capital requirements of the Bank. Prior to the declaration of dividends, management considers the effect such payments will have on total stockholders equity and capital ratios.
d) Capital Resources
At June 30, 2010, stockholders equity totaled $162,035,000, an increase of $8,421,000 since December 31, 2009. See the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity for further detail of the change in equity since the end of 2009. Accumulated other comprehensive income which, for Bancorp, consists of net unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale and a minimum pension liability adjustment, net of taxes, totaled $3,886,000 at June 30, 2010 and $2,199,000 at December 31, 2009. The change since year end is a reflection of maturities within the portfolio and the effect of change in interest rates on the valuation of the Banks portfolio of securities available for sale. The unrealized pension liability is adjusted annually by reference to updated actuarial data.
Bank holding companies and their subsidiary banks are required by regulators to meet risk based capital standards. These standards, or ratios, measure the relationship of capital to a combination of balance sheet and off-balance sheet risks. The values of both balance sheet and off-balance sheet items are adjusted to reflect credit risks. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 10%; a Tier 1 ratio of at least 6%; and a leverage ratio of at least 5%.
40
The following table sets forth Bancorps and the Banks risk based capital amounts and ratios as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Actual
Minimum ForAdequate
Minimum For WellCapitalized
Ratio
Total risk-based capital (1)
Consolidated
217,356
13.71
126,831
8.00
NA
Bank
169,651
10.81
125,551
156,939
10.00
Tier I risk-based capital (1)
187,467
11.83
63,387
4.00
139,960
8.92
62,762
94,143
6.00
Leverage (2)
10.36
54,286
3.00
52,948
88,247
5.00
210,064
13.55
124,023
157,535
10.23
123,195
153,993
180,734
11.66
62,001
128,245
8.33
61,582
92,373
10.16
53,366
7.24
53,140
88,567
(1) Ratio is computed in relation to risk-weighted assets.
(2) Ratio is computed in relation to average assets.
NA Not applicable. Well capitalized is not defined for holding companies in regulatory framework.
The variance between the consolidated and the Banks capital ratios is largely due to the Bancorps 2008 issuance of $30 million of trust preferred securities and a special dividend of $25 million from the Bank to Bancorp in December 2009 as part of a strategy to minimize state bank taxes.
The ratio of tangible common equity to total tangible assets, both non-GAAP measures, stood at 8.68% as of June 30, 2010, versus 8.54% at December 31, 2009. Bancorp provides this ratio, in addition to those defined by banking regulators, because of its widespread use by investors as a means to evaluate the
quality and adequacy of capital. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures section below for a reconciliation of the calculation of this measure to amounts reported under GAAP.
e) Non-GAAP Financial Measures
In addition to capital ratios defined by banking regulators, Bancorp considers various ratios when evaluating capital adequacy, including tangible common equity to tangible assets, and tangible common equity per share, all of which are non-GAAP measures. Bancorp believes these ratios are important because of their widespread use by investors as means to evaluate capital adequacy, as they reflect the level of capital available to withstand unexpected market conditions. Because GAAP does not include capital ratio measures, there are no GAAP financial measures comparable to these ratios. The following table reconciles Bancorps calculation of the measures to amounts reported under GAAP.
(in thousands, except per share data)
Total equity (a)
Less goodwill
(682
Tangible common equity (c)
161,353
152,932
Total assets (b)
Total tangible assets (d)
1,858,796
1,790,797
Total shareholders' equity to total assets (a/b)
8.71
8.57
Tangible common equity ratio (c/d)
8.68
8.54
Number of outstanding shares (e)
Book value per share (a/e)
11.29
Tangible common equity per share (c/e)
11.78
11.24
f) Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The update requires new disclosures including significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. Also, the ASU provides an update on the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the update on the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The portion that is currently effective did not have an impact on Bancorps consolidated financial statements. The portion that is not yet effective is also not expected to have an impact on Bancorps financial statements.
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, which requires significant new disclosures about the allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of financing receivables, which for Bancorp includes loans and standby letters of credit. The requirements are intended to enhance transparency regarding credit
42
losses and the credit quality of loan and lease receivables. Under this statement, allowance for loan losses is to be disclosed by portfolio segment, while credit quality information, impaired loans and nonaccrual status are to be presented by class. Disclosure of the nature and extent, the financial impact and segment information of troubled debt restructurings will also be required. The disclosures are to be presented at the level of disaggregation that management uses when assessing and monitoring the portfolios risk and performance. This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-20 is expected to result in additional quarterly and annual disclosures beginning in the fourth quarter of 2010.
g) Recent Legislative Developments
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Act) was signed into law on July 21, 2010. Generally, the Act is effective the day after it was signed into law, but different effective dates apply to specific sections of the law. Uncertainty remains as to the ultimate impact of the Act, which could have an adverse impact on the financial services industry as a whole and on Bancorps business, results of operations and financial condition.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Information required by this item is included in Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Bancorp maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that it is able to collect the information it is required to disclose in reports it files with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and to record, process, summarize and report this information within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Based on their evaluation of Bancorps disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the quarterly period covered by this report, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers believe that these controls and procedures are effective to ensure that Bancorp is able to collect, process and disclose the information it is required to disclose in reports it files with the SEC within the required time periods.
Based on the evaluation of Bancorps disclosure controls and procedures by the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, there were no significant changes during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 in Bancorps internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Bancorps internal control over financial reporting.
43
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table shows information relating to the repurchase of shares of common stock by Bancorp during the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Total number ofSharesPurchased (1)
Average pricePaid Per Share
Total number ofShares Purchased asPart of PubliclyAnnounced Plan (2)
Maximum Number ofShares that May Yet BePurchased Under thePlan
April 1 - April 30
May 1 - May 31
4,168
23.99
June 1 - June 30
(1) Second quarter 2010 activity represents shares surrendered by officers, the fair value of which equaled the exercise price of stock options. This activity has no impact on the number of shares that may be purchased under a Board-approved plan.
(2) The Board of Directors of S.Y. Bancorp Inc. first approved a share buyback plan in 1999, and in February 2005, July 2007, and November 2007 expanded the plan to allow for the repurchase of additional shares. The stock repurchase program expired in November 2008, and has not been renewed.
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed or furnished as a part of this report:
Exhibitnumber
Description of exhibit
31.1
Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by David P. Heintzman
31.2
Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by Nancy B. Davis
Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 5, 2010
By:
/s/ David P. Heintzman
David P. Heintzman, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Nancy B. Davis
Nancy B. Davis, Executive Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
45