Texas Capital Bancshares - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

 

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

214/932-6600
(Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code)

N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ  No o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o No o

Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.
Form 10-Q
Quarter Ended September 30, 2009

Index

TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME — UNAUDITED
(In thousands except per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY — UNAUDITED
(In thousands except share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — UNAUDITED
(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (“the Company”), a Delaware financial holding company, was incorporated in November 1996 and commenced operations in March 1998. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Texas Capital Bank, National Association (the “Bank”). The Bank currently provides commercial banking services to its customers in Texas and concentrates on middle market commercial and high net worth customers.

The accounting and reporting policies of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and to generally accepted practices within the banking industry. Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. and its subsidiary, the Bank. Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared without audit. Certain information and footnote disclosures presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments and the disclosures made are adequate to make interim financial information not misleading. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, the financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, 2008, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 19, 2009 (the “2008 Form 10-K”). Operating results for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year or any future period. We have evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure through October 22, 2009, the date the consolidated financial statements were issued.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The allowance for possible loan losses, the valuation allowance for other real estate owned (“OREO”), the fair value of stock-based compensation awards, the fair values of financial instruments and the status of contingencies are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term.

Unrealized gains or losses on our available-for-sale securities (after applicable income tax expense or benefit) are included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net. Accumulated comprehensive income (loss), net for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is reported in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity. We had comprehensive income of $7.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and comprehensive income of $9.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Comprehensive income during the three months ended September 30, 2009 included a net after-tax gain of $2.0 million, and comprehensive income during the three months ended September 30, 2008 included a net after-tax gain of $1.7 million due to changes in the net unrealized gains/losses on securities available-for-sale.

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant market information and other assumptions. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment regarding interest rates, credit risk, prepayments and other factors, especially in the absence of broad markets for particular items. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates. The fair value estimates of existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments do not include the value of anticipated future business or the value of assets and liabilities not considered financial instruments. Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted the reporting requirements of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). The adoption of ASC 820 did not have an impact on our financial statements except for the expanded disclosures noted in Note 10 — Fair Value Disclosures.

The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands except per share data):

Securities are identified as either held-to-maturity or available-for-sale based upon various factors, including asset/liability management strategies, liquidity and profitability objectives, and regulatory requirements. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at cost, adjusted for amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts. Available-for-sale securities are securities that may be sold prior to maturity based upon asset/liability management decisions. Securities identified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains or losses on available-for-sale securities are recorded as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity, net of taxes. Amortization of premiums or accretion of discounts on mortgage-backed securities is periodically adjusted for estimated prepayments.

Our net unrealized gain on the available-for-sale securities portfolio value increased from a gain of $2.9 million, which represented 0.77% of the amortized cost at December 31, 2008, to a gain of $10.3 million, which represented 3.75% of the amortized cost at September 30, 2009.

The following is a summary of securities (in thousands):

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities are presented below by contractual maturity (in thousands, except percentage data):

Securities with carrying values of approximately $216,848,000 were pledged to secure certain borrowings and deposits at September 30, 2009. Of the pledged securities at September 30, 2009, approximately $141,287,000 were pledged for certain deposits, and approximately $75,561,000 were pledged for repurchase agreements.

The following table discloses, as of September 30, 2009, our investment securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than 12 months and those that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 or more months (in thousands):

At September 30, 2009, the number of investment positions in this unrealized loss position totals 4. We do not believe these unrealized losses are “other than temporary” as (1) we have the ability and intent to hold the investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery in market value, and (2) it is not probable that we will be unable to collect the amounts contractually due. The unrealized losses noted are interest rate related, and losses have decreased as rates decreased in 2008 and 2009. We have not identified any issues related to the ultimate repayment of principal as a result of credit concerns on these securities.

At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, loans were as follows (in thousands):

We continue to lend primarily in Texas. As of September 30, 2009, a substantial majority of the principal amount of the loans held for investment in our portfolio was to businesses and individuals in Texas. This geographic concentration subjects the loan portfolio to the general economic conditions in Texas. We originate substantially all of the loans in our portfolio, except in certain instances we have purchased selected loan participations and interests in certain syndicated credits and United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) government guaranteed loans. The risks created by this concentration have been considered by management in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to cover estimated losses on loans at each balance sheet date.

Non-performing loans and leases at September 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Activity in the allowance for loan losses was as follows (in thousands):

Other real estate owned, which is included in other assets on the balance sheet, consists of real estate that has been foreclosed. Real estate that has been foreclosed is recorded at the lower of the amount of the loan balance or the fair value of the real estate, less selling costs prior to foreclosure, through a charge to the allowance for loan losses, if necessary. Subsequent write-downs required for declines in value are recorded through a valuation allowance and a provision for losses charged to other non-interest expense.

Activity in the valuation allowance for losses on OREO was as follows (in thousands):

The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit which involve varying degrees of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the borrower.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory (and possibly additional discretionary) actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and of Tier I capital (as defined) to average assets (as defined). Management believes, as of September 30, 2009, that the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

We participated in the U.S. Treasury Capital Purchase Program in the first quarter 2009 and issued $75 million of Series A preferred stock and related warrants. In the second quarter 2009, we repurchased the preferred stock related to the Program and completed a public offering of 4.6 million shares of common stock in May 2009. The new capital from this offering qualifies as Tier 1 capital and increased our Tier 1 and total capital ratios. For additional information regarding the preferred stock and warrant and the common stock offering, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements.

Financial institutions are categorized as well capitalized or adequately capitalized, based on minimum total risk-based, Tier I risk-based and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the tables below. As shown below, the Company’s capital ratios exceed the regulatory definition of adequately capitalized as of September 30, 2009 and 2008. As of June 30, 2009, the most recent notification from the OCC categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There have been no conditions or events since the notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s category. Based upon the information in its most recently filed call report, the Bank continues to meet the capital ratios necessary to be well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action and continues to meet the capital ratios necessary to be well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.

The fair value of our stock option and stock appreciation right (“SAR”) grants are estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide the best single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

We recognized stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $4.4 million and $3.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The amount for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is comprised of $145,000 related to unvested options issued prior to the adoption of ASC Topic 718,

Compensation — Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”), $433,000 related to SARs issued in 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 and $926,000 related to restricted stock units (“RSUs”) issued in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. The amount for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is comprised of $492,000 related to unvested options issued prior to the adoption of ASC 718, $1.2 million related to SARs issued in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009, and $2.7 million related to RSUs issued in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested options issued prior to adoption of ASC 718 is $355,000. At September 30, 2009, the weighted average period over which this unrecognized expense is expected to be recognized was 0.9 years. Unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to grants subsequent to 2005 is $14.3 million. At September 30, 2009, the weighted average period over which this unrecognized expense is expected to be recognized was 2.0 years.

Subsequent to the end of the first quarter of 2007, we and the purchaser of our residential mortgage loan division (RML) agreed to terminate and settle the contractual arrangements related to the sale of the division, which had been completed as of the end of the third quarter of 2006. Historical operating results of RML are reflected as discontinued operations in the financial statements.

During the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the loss from discontinued operations was $41,000 and $252,000, net of taxes, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the loss from discontinued operations was $180,000 and $516,000, net of taxes, respectively. The 2009 losses are primarily related to continuing legal and salary expenses incurred in dealing with the remaining loans and requests from investors related to the repurchase of previously sold loans. We still have approximately $589,000 in loans held for sale from discontinued operations that are carried at the estimated market value at quarter-end, which is less than the original cost. We plan to sell these loans, but timing and price to be realized cannot be determined at this time due to market conditions. In addition, we continue to address requests from investors related to repurchasing loans previously sold. While the balances as of September 30, 2009 include a liability for exposure to additional contingencies, including risk of having to repurchase loans previously sold, we recognize that market conditions may result in additional exposure to loss and the extension of time necessary to complete the discontinued mortgage operation.

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted ASC 820, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have an impact on our financial statements except for the expanded disclosures noted below.

We determine the fair market values of our financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value as provided below.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value at September 30, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):

Financial instruments are considered Level 3 when their values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable. Level 3 financial instruments also include those for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. Currently, we measure fair value for certain loans on a nonrecurring basis as described below.

Generally accepted accounting principles require disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practical to estimate that value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. This disclosure does not and is not intended to represent the fair value of the Company.

A summary of the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments is as follows (in thousands):

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:

The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value.

The fair value of investment securities is based on prices obtained from independent pricing services which are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar securities.

For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are generally based on carrying values. The fair value for other loans is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. The carrying amount of accrued interest approximates its fair value. The carrying amount of loans held for sale approximates fair value.

The estimated fair value of the interest rate swaps are based on internal cash flow models supported by market data inputs.

The carrying amounts for variable-rate money market accounts approximate their fair value. Fixed-term certificates of deposit fair values are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities.

The carrying value reported in the consolidated balance sheet for federal funds purchased and short-term borrowings approximates their fair value. The fair value of term borrowings and trust preferred subordinated debentures is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on similar borrowings.

Fair values for our off-balance sheet instruments which consist of lending commitments and standby letters of credit are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. Management believes that the fair value of these off-balance sheet instruments is not significant.

On September 10, 2008, we completed a sale of 4 million shares of our common stock in a private placement to a number of institutional investors. The purchase price was $14.50 per share, and net proceeds from the sale totaled $55 million. The new capital has been used for general corporate purposes, including capital for support of anticipated growth of our bank.

On January 16, 2009, we completed the issuance of $75 million of Series A perpetual preferred stock and related warrant under the U.S. Department of Treasury’s voluntary Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”). The warrant represents the right to purchase 758,086 shares of our common stock at an initial exercise price of $14.84 per share. The warrant was valued at $4.2 million, which was calculated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. The warrant valuation model required several inputs, including the risk free rate, and volatility factor. In addition to the Black-Scholes method we applied the Binomial Lattice Model and determined there was no material difference in value between the two methods. On May 8, 2009, we repurchased the $75 million in preferred stock from the Treasury. We recorded a $3.9 million accelerated deemed dividend representing the unamortized value of the outstanding warrants issued to the U.S. Department of Treasury to account for the difference between the book value and the carrying value of the preferred stock repurchased from the Treasury. The $3.9 million accelerated deemed dividend, combined with the previously scheduled preferred dividend of $523,000 resulted in a total dividend of $4.4 million during the second quarter of 2009. We did not repurchase the warrants, so the Treasury has the option to sell the warrants in the open market to a third party.

On May 8, 2009, we completed a sale of 4.6 million shares of our common stock in a public offering. The purchase price was $13.75 per share, and net proceeds from the sale totaled $59.4 million. The new capital will be used for general corporate purposes, including capital for support of anticipated growth of our bank.

FASB ASC 105 Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“ASC 105”) establishes the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative guidance for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. All non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification is superseded and deemed non-authoritative. ASC 105 was adopted on September 15, 2009, and did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL SUMMARY — UNAUDITED
Consolidated Daily Average Balances, Average Yields and Rates
(In thousands)