Companies:
10,793
total market cap:
$134.746 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
Timberland Bancorp
TSBK
#7887
Rank
$0.32 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$41.49
Share price
2.83%
Change (1 day)
45.48%
Change (1 year)
๐ฆ Banks
๐ณ Financial services
Categories
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
Annual Reports (10-K)
Timberland Bancorp
Quarterly Reports (10-Q)
Financial Year FY2015 Q3
Timberland Bancorp - 10-Q quarterly report FY2015 Q3
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2015
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period from _____ to _____.
Commission file number 0-23333
TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Washington
91-1863696
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
624 Simpson Avenue, Hoquiam, Washington
98550
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(360) 533-4747
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
X
No ___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes _X_ No __
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer ___ Accelerated Filer
Non-accelerated filer __ Smaller reporting company _X_
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ___ No _X_
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
CLASS
SHARES OUTSTANDING AT JULY 31, 2015
Common stock, $.01 par value
7,053,636
INDEX
PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page
Item 1.
Financial Statements (unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
7
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
8
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
9
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
11
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
38
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
49
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
49
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
50
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
50
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
50
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
50
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
50
Item 5
.
Other Information
50
Item 6.
Exhibits
51
SIGNATURES
Certifications
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32
Exhibit 101
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2015
and
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
June 30,
2015
September 30,
2014
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from financial institutions
$
13,800
$
11,818
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
62,373
60,536
Total cash and cash equivalents
76,173
72,354
Certificates of deposit (“CDs”) held for investment (at cost, which
approximates fair value)
47,053
35,845
Investment securities - held to maturity, at amortized cost
(estimated fair value $8,958 and $6,274)
8,018
5,298
Investment securities - available for sale
1,401
2,857
Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (“FHLB”) stock
2,699
5,246
Loans receivable
604,843
575,280
Loans held for sale
3,835
899
Less: Allowance for loan losses
(10,467
)
(10,427
)
Net loans receivable
598,211
565,752
Premises and equipment, net
17,083
17,679
Other real estate owned (“OREO”) and other repossessed assets, net
8,063
9,092
Accrued interest receivable
2,132
1,910
Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”)
18,034
17,632
Goodwill
5,650
5,650
Core deposit intangible (“CDI”)
—
3
Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”)
1,469
1,684
Other assets
3,801
4,563
Total assets
$
789,787
$
745,565
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing demand
$
122,133
$
106,417
Interest-bearing
532,585
508,699
Total deposits
654,718
615,116
FHLB advances
45,000
45,000
Other liabilities and accrued expenses
2,779
2,671
Total liabilities
702,497
662,787
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
3
TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
June 30, 2015
and
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
June 30,
2015
September 30,
2014
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized;
7,053,636 shares issued and outstanding - June 30, 2015 7,047,336 shares issued and outstanding - September 30, 2014
$
10,948
$
10,773
Unearned shares issued to Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)
(992
)
(1,190
)
Retained earnings
77,673
73,534
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(339
)
(339
)
Total shareholders’ equity
87,290
82,778
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
$
789,787
$
745,565
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
4
TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Nine Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Interest and dividend income
Loans receivable
$
7,756
$
7,238
$
22,617
$
21,811
Investment securities
59
66
179
190
Dividends from mutual funds and FHLB stock
7
6
21
21
Interest-bearing deposits in banks
125
87
343
268
Total interest and dividend income
7,947
7,397
23,160
22,290
Interest expense
Deposits
492
498
1,496
1,562
FHLB advances
471
466
1,411
1,399
Total interest expense
963
964
2,907
2,961
Net interest income
6,984
6,433
20,253
19,329
Provision for loan losses
—
—
—
—
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
6,984
6,433
20,253
19,329
Non-interest income
Recoveries (other than temporary impairment “OTTI”) on investment securities
—
(38
)
—
49
Adjustment for portion of OTTI (transferred from) recorded as other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes
(4
)
29
(5
)
29
Net recoveries (OTTI) on investment securities
(4
)
(9
)
(5
)
78
Gain (loss) on sale of investment securities available for sale, net
—
—
45
(32
)
Service charges on deposits
899
921
2,635
2,795
ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees
691
611
1,964
1,769
BOLI net earnings
133
134
401
392
Gain on sales of loans, net
514
241
1,098
714
Escrow fees
57
45
155
111
Fee income from non-deposit investment sales
26
14
38
58
Other
207
159
529
439
Total non-interest income, net
2,523
2,116
6,860
6,324
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
5
TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (continued)
For the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Non-interest expense
Salaries and employee benefits
$
3,196
$
3,325
$
9,877
$
10,138
Premises and equipment
763
759
2,239
2,099
Gain on sale of premises and equipment, net
(299
)
(5
)
(299
)
(5
)
Advertising
169
187
529
537
OREO and other repossessed assets, net
193
240
617
795
ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees
336
207
929
791
Postage and courier
104
122
322
329
Amortization of CDI
—
29
3
87
State and local taxes
189
123
426
361
Professional fees
207
196
606
590
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") insurance
142
158
449
479
Other insurance
28
34
103
113
Loan administration and foreclosure
88
129
207
377
Data processing and telecommunications
449
399
1,299
1,058
Deposit operations
220
146
615
569
Other
435
381
1,225
1,107
Total non-interest expense
6,220
6,430
19,147
19,425
Income before federal income taxes
3,287
2,119
7,966
6,228
Provision for federal income taxes
1,128
685
2,629
2,024
Net income
2,159
1,434
5,337
4,204
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
—
(136
)
Preferred stock discount accretion
—
—
—
(70
)
Net income to common shareholders
$
2,159
$
1,434
$
5,337
$
3,998
Net income per common share
Basic
$
0.31
$
0.21
$
0.77
$
0.58
Diluted
$
0.31
$
0.20
$
0.76
$
0.57
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic
6,902,067
6,857,149
6,897,381
6,855,811
Diluted
7,071,221
7,033,713
7,068,821
7,015,155
Dividends paid per common share
$
0.06
$
0.04
$
0.17
$
0.11
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
6
TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30,
Nine Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Net income
$
2,159
$
1,434
$
5,337
$
4,204
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes:
Unrealized holding loss on investment securities available for sale, net of income taxes
(14
)
(8
)
(39
)
(59
)
Change in OTTI on investment securities held to maturity, net of income taxes:
Additional amount recovered related to credit loss for which OTTI was previously recognized
7
11
8
11
Amount reclassified to credit loss for previously recorded market loss
3
8
4
8
Accretion of OTTI on investment securities held to maturity, net of income taxes
12
14
27
38
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes
8
25
—
(2
)
Total comprehensive income
$
2,167
$
1,459
$
5,337
$
4,202
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
7
TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the nine months ended
June 30, 2015
and the year ended
September 30, 2014
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Number of Shares
Amount
Unearned
Shares Issued to
ESOP
Accumulated
Other
Compre-
hensive
Loss
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Preferred
Stock
Common
Stock
Retained
Earnings
Total
Balance, September 30, 2013
12,065
7,045,036
$
11,936
$
10,570
$
(1,454
)
$
68,998
$
(362
)
$
89,688
Net income
—
—
—
—
—
5,850
—
5,850
Accretion of preferred stock
discount
—
—
70
—
—
(70
)
—
—
Redemption of preferred stock
(12,065
)
—
(12,006
)
—
—
(59
)
—
(12,065
)
Exercise of stock options
—
5,000
—
23
—
—
—
23
Forfeiture of MRDP (1) shares
—
(2,700
)
—
—
—
—
—
—
5% preferred stock dividends
—
—
—
—
—
(58
)
—
(58
)
Common stock dividends ($0.16 per common share)
—
—
—
—
—
(1,127
)
—
(1,127
)
Earned ESOP shares, net of tax
—
—
—
64
264
—
—
328
MRDP compensation expense, net of tax
—
—
—
4
—
—
—
4
Stock option compensation expense
—
—
—
112
—
—
—
112
Unrealized holding loss on investment securities available for sale, net of tax
—
—
—
—
—
—
(63
)
(63
)
Change in OTTI on investment securities held to maturity, net of tax
—
—
—
—
—
—
34
34
Accretion of OTTI on investment securities held to maturity, net of tax
—
—
—
—
—
—
52
52
Balance, September 30, 2014
—
7,047,336
—
10,773
(1,190
)
73,534
(339
)
82,778
Net income
—
—
—
—
—
5,337
—
5,337
Exercise of stock options
—
6,300
—
30
—
—
—
30
Common stock dividends ($0.17 per common share)
—
—
—
—
—
(1,198
)
—
(1,198
)
Earned ESOP shares, net of tax
—
—
—
54
198
—
—
252
Stock option compensation expense
—
—
—
91
—
—
—
91
Unrealized holding loss on investment securities available for sale, net of tax
—
—
—
—
—
—
(39
)
(39
)
Change in OTTI on securities held to maturity, net of tax
—
—
—
—
—
—
12
12
Accretion of OTTI on investment securities held to maturity, net of tax
—
—
—
—
—
—
27
27
Balance, June 30, 2015
—
7,053,636
$
—
$
10,948
$
(992
)
$
77,673
$
(339
)
$
87,290
__________________________
(1) 1998 Management Recognition and Development Plan (“MRDP”).
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
8
TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
2015
2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income
$
5,337
$
4,204
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation
1,014
886
Deferred federal income taxes
231
—
Amortization of CDI
3
87
Earned ESOP shares
198
198
MRDP compensation expense
—
2
Stock option compensation expense
89
76
Stock option tax effect less excess tax benefit
1
—
Gain on sales of OREO and other repossessed assets, net
(109
)
(185
)
Provision for OREO losses
490
491
Gain on sale of premises and equipment, net
(299
)
(5
)
BOLI net earnings
(401
)
(392
)
Gain on sales of loans, net
(1,098
)
(714
)
Net change in deferred loan origination fees
323
(23
)
Net OTTI (recoveries) on investment securities
5
(78
)
(Gain) loss on sale of investment securities available for sale, net
(45
)
32
Amortization of MSRs
40
—
Loans originated for sale
(39,299
)
(22,177
)
Proceeds from sales of loans
37,461
23,301
Net change in accrued interest receivable and other assets
439
559
Net change in other liabilities and accrued expenses
108
(29
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
4,488
6,233
Cash flows from investing activities
Net increase in CDs held for investment
(11,208
)
(2,294
)
Proceeds from sale of investment securities available for sale
1,220
856
Proceeds from maturities and prepayments of investment securities available for sale
224
288
Purchase of investment securities held to maturity
(2,988
)
(3,003
)
Proceeds from maturities and prepayments of investment securities held to maturity
364
424
Redemption of FHLB stock
2,547
153
Increase in loans receivable, net
(31,414
)
(14,834
)
Additions to premises and equipment
(584
)
(1,021
)
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
465
37
Proceeds from sales of OREO and other repossessed assets
2,216
5,098
Net cash used in investing activities
(39,158
)
(14,296
)
S
ee notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
9
TIMBERLAND BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (continued)
For the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
2015
2014
Cash flows from financing activities
Increase (decrease) in deposits, net
$
39,602
$
(9,630
)
ESOP tax effect
54
46
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
29
16
Stock option excess tax benefit
1
—
Issuance of common stock
1
—
Redemption of preferred stock
—
(12,065
)
Dividends paid
(1,198
)
(833
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
38,489
(22,466
)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
3,819
(30,529
)
Cash and cash equivalents
Beginning of period
72,354
94,496
End of period
$
76,173
$
63,967
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Income taxes paid
$
2,630
$
2,108
Interest paid
2,917
2,987
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities
Loans transferred to OREO and other repossessed assets
$
1,568
$
5,665
Other comprehensive loss related to investment securities
—
38
Loans originated to facilitate the sale of OREO
—
809
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
10
Timberland Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(a) Basis of Presentation: The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (“Company”) were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with instructions for Form 10-Q and, therefore, do not include all disclosures necessary for a complete presentation of consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with GAAP. However, all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2014 (“2014 Form 10-K”). The unaudited condensed consolidated results of operations for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year ending September 30, 2015.
(b) Principles of Consolidation: The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Timberland Bank (“Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Timberland Service Corp. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
(c) Operating Segment: The Company has one reportable operating segment which is defined as community banking in western Washington under the operating name, “Timberland Bank.”
(d) The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(e) Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the
June 30, 2015
presentation with no change to net income or total shareholders’ equity previously reported.
(2) PREFERRED STOCK SOLD IN TROUBLED ASSET RELIEF PROGRAM (“TARP”) CAPITAL PURCHASE PROGRAM (“CPP”)
On December 23, 2008, the Company received
$16.64 million
from the U.S. Treasury Department (“Treasury”) as a part of the Treasury’s CPP, which was established as part of the TARP. The Company sold
16,641
shares of Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A (“Series A Preferred Stock”), with a liquidation value of
$1,000
per share and a related warrant to purchase
370,899
shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of
$6.73
per share (subject to anti-dilution adjustments) at any time through December 23, 2018.
On November 13, 2012, the Company’s outstanding
16,641
shares of Series A Preferred Stock were sold by the Treasury as part of its efforts to manage and recover its investments under the TARP. While the sale of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock to new owners did not result in any proceeds to the Company and did not change the Company’s capital position or accounting for these securities, it did eliminate restrictions put in place by the Treasury on TARP recipients.
On June 12, 2013, the Treasury sold, to private investors, the warrant to purchase up to
370,899
shares of the Company's common stock. The sale of the warrant to new owners did not result in any proceeds to the Company and did not change the Company's capital position or accounting for the warrant.
During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company purchased and retired
4,576
shares of its Series A Preferred Stock for
$4.32 million
; a
$255,000
discount from the liquidation value. The discount from the liquidation value on the repurchased shares was recorded as an increase to retained earnings. On December 20, 2013, the Company redeemed the remaining
12,065
shares of its Series A Preferred Stock at the liquidation value of
$12.07 million
. The Series A Preferred Stock paid a
5.0%
dividend through December 20, 2013, the date of its redemption.
11
(3) INVESTMENT SECURITIES
Held to maturity and available for sale investment securities have been classified according to management’s intent and are as follows as of
June 30, 2015
and
September 30, 2014
(in thousands):
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Estimated
Fair Value
June 30, 2015
Held to maturity
Mortgage-backed securities ("MBS"):
U.S. government agencies
$
873
$
25
$
(2
)
$
896
Private label residential
1,141
913
(5
)
2,049
U.S. treasury and U.S government agency securities
6,004
32
(23
)
6,013
Total
$
8,018
$
970
$
(30
)
$
8,958
Available for sale
MBS:
U.S. government agencies
$
404
$
35
$
(1
)
$
438
Mutual funds
1,000
—
(37
)
963
Total
$
1,404
$
35
$
(38
)
$
1,401
September 30, 2014
Held to maturity
MBS:
U.S. government agencies
$
1,002
$
32
$
(2
)
$
1,032
Private label residential
1,280
965
(7
)
2,238
U.S. government agency securities
3,016
1
(13
)
3,004
Total
$
5,298
$
998
$
(22
)
$
6,274
Available for sale
MBS:
U.S. government agencies
$
1,801
$
100
$
(2
)
$
1,899
Mutual funds
1,000
—
(42
)
958
Total
$
2,801
$
100
$
(44
)
$
2,857
12
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses for all securities and the length of time these unrealized losses existed as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Total
Estimated
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Qty
Estimated
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Qty
Estimated
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Held to maturity
MBS:
U.S. government agencies
$
—
$
—
—
$
66
$
(2
)
5
$
66
$
(2
)
Private label residential
1
—
3
178
(5
)
11
179
(5
)
U.S. treasury and U.S. government agency securities
2,965
(23
)
1
—
—
—
2,965
(23
)
Total
$
2,966
$
(23
)
4
$
244
$
(7
)
16
$
3,210
$
(30
)
Available for sale
MBS:
U.S. government agencies
$
1
$
—
2
$
50
$
(1
)
2
$
51
$
(1
)
Mutual Funds
—
—
—
963
(37
)
1
963
(37
)
Total
$
1
$
—
2
$
1,013
$
(38
)
3
$
1,014
$
(38
)
The following table summarizes the estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses for all securities and the length of time these unrealized losses existed as of
September 30, 2014
(dollars in thousands):
Less Than 12 Months
12 Months or Longer
Total
Estimated
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized Losses
Qty
Estimated
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized Losses
Qty
Estimated
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized Losses
Held to maturity
MBS:
U.S. government agencies
$
—
$
—
—
$
76
$
(2
)
8
$
76
$
(2
)
Private label residential
9
—
1
188
(7
)
11
197
(7
)
U.S. government agency securities
2,989
(13
)
1
—
—
—
2,989
(13
)
Total
$
2,998
$
(13
)
2
$
264
$
(9
)
19
$
3,262
$
(22
)
Available for sale
MBS:
U.S. government agencies
$
19
$
—
1
$
40
$
(2
)
1
$
59
$
(2
)
Mutual funds
—
—
—
958
(42
)
1
958
(42
)
Total
$
19
$
—
1
$
998
$
(44
)
2
$
1,017
$
(44
)
The Company has evaluated these securities and has determined that the decline in their value is temporary. The unrealized losses are primarily due to changes in market interest rates and spreads in the market for mortgage-related products. The fair
13
value of these securities is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity dates and/or as the pricing spreads narrow on mortgage-related securities. The Company has the ability and the intent to hold the investments until the market value recovers. Furthermore, as of
June 30, 2015
, management does not have the intent to sell any of the securities classified as available for sale where the estimated fair value is below the recorded value and believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell such securities before a recovery of cost or recorded value if previously written down.
In accordance with GAAP, the Company bifurcates OTTI into (1) amounts related to credit losses which are recognized through earnings and (2) amounts related to all other factors which are recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).
To determine the component of the gross OTTI related to credit losses, the Company compared the amortized cost basis of each OTTI security to the present value of its revised expected cash flows, discounted using its pre-impairment yield. The revised expected cash flow estimates for individual securities are based primarily on an analysis of default rates, prepayment speeds and third-party analytic reports. Significant judgment by management is required in this analysis that includes, but is not limited to, assumptions regarding the collectability of principal and interest, net of related expenses, on the underlying loans.
The following table presents a summary of the significant inputs utilized to measure management’s estimate of the credit loss component on OTTI securities as of
June 30, 2015
and
September 30, 2014
:
Range
Weighted
Minimum
Maximum
Average
June 30, 2015
Constant prepayment rate
6.00
%
15.00
%
10.38
%
Collateral default rate
0.22
%
18.51
%
6.78
%
Loss severity rate
5.41
%
68.54
%
44.17
%
September 30, 2014
Constant prepayment rate
6.00
%
15.00
%
10.59
%
Collateral default rate
0.01
%
22.34
%
7.41
%
Loss severity rate
0.16
%
75.17
%
45.81
%
The following tables present the OTTI for the
three and nine
months ended
June 30, 2015
and 2014 (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Held To
Maturity
Available
For Sale
Held To
Maturity
Available
For Sale
Total (OTTI) recoveries
$
—
$
—
$
(38
)
$
—
Adjustment for portion recorded as (transfered from)
other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes (1)
(4
)
—
29
—
Net (OTTI) recoveries recognized in earnings (2)
$
(4
)
$
—
$
(9
)
$
—
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2015
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Held To
Maturity
Available
For Sale
Held To
Maturity
Available
For Sale
Total (OTTI) recoveries
$
—
$
—
$
49
$
—
Adjustment for portion recorded as (transferred from)
other comprehensive income (loss) before income taxes (1)
(5
)
—
29
—
Net (OTTI) recoveries recognized in earnings (2)
$
(5
)
$
—
$
78
$
—
________________________
(1)
Represents (OTTI) recoveries related to all other factors or (OTTI) recoveries related to credit losses transferred from OCI.
(2)
Represents net recoveries (OTTI) related to credit losses.
14
The following table presents a roll-forward of the credit loss component of held to maturity and available for sale debt securities that have been written down for OTTI with the credit loss component recognized in earnings and the remaining impairment loss related to all other factors recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) for the nine months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
Nine Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Beginning balance of credit loss
$
1,654
$
2,084
Additions:
Credit losses for which OTTI was
not previously recognized
—
2
Additional increases to the amount
related to credit loss for which OTTI
was previously recognized
5
13
Subtractions:
Realized losses previously recorded
as credit losses
(58
)
(535
)
Recovery of prior credit loss
—
90
Ending balance of credit loss
$
1,601
$
1,654
There was
no
realized gain on the sale of investment securities for the three months ended
June 30, 2015
, and there was a
$45,000
realized gain on the sale of investment securities for the nine months ended
June 30, 2015
. There was
no
realized loss on the sale of investment securities for the three months ended
June 30, 2014
, and there was a
$32,000
realized loss on the sale of investment securities for the nine months ended June 30, 2014. During the three months ended
June 30, 2015
, the Company recorded a net
$20,000
realized loss (as a result of the securities being deemed worthless) on
12
held to maturity residential MBS, of which the entire amount had been recognized previously as a credit loss. During the nine months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded a net
$58,000
realized loss (as a result of securities being deemed worthless) on
14
held to maturity residential MBS, of which the entire amount had been recognized previously as a credit loss. During the three months ended
June 30, 2014
, the Company recorded a
$40,000
realized loss (as a result of the securities being deemed worthless) on
12
held to maturity residential MBS, of which the entire amount had been recognized previously as a credit loss. During the nine months ended June 30, 2014, the Company recorded a net
$445,000
realized loss (as a result of securities being deemed worthless) on
15
held to maturity residential MBS and
six
available for sale MBS, of which the entire amount had previously been recognized as a credit loss.
The amortized cost of residential mortgage-backed and agency securities pledged as collateral for public fund deposits, federal treasury tax and loan deposits, FHLB collateral, retail repurchase agreements and other non-profit organization deposits totaled
$7.31 million
and
$6.22 million
at
June 30, 2015
and
September 30, 2014
, respectively.
The contractual maturities of debt securities at
June 30, 2015
were as follows (dollars in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from scheduled maturities as a result of the prepayment of principal or call provisions.
Held to Maturity
Available for Sale
Amortized
Cost
Estimated
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Estimated
Fair
Value
Due within one year
$
—
$
—
$
—
$
—
Due after one year to five years
6,006
6,015
13
13
Due after five to ten years
23
24
—
—
Due after ten years
1,989
2,919
391
425
Total
$
8,018
$
8,958
$
404
$
438
15
(4) GOODWILL
The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. Step one of the goodwill impairment test estimates the fair value of the reporting unit. If the estimated fair value of the Company's sole reporting unit, the Bank, under step one exceeds the recorded value of the reporting unit, goodwill is not considered impaired and no further analysis is necessary. If the estimated fair value of the Company's sole reporting unit is less than the recorded value, then a step two test, which calculates the fair value of assets and liabilities to calculate an implied value of goodwill, is performed.
Step one of the goodwill impairment test estimates the fair value of the reporting unit utilizing a discounted cash flow income approach analysis, a public company market approach analysis, a merger and acquisition market approach analysis and a trading price market approach analysis in order to derive an enterprise value for the Company.
The discounted cash flow income approach analysis uses a reporting unit's projection of estimated operating results and cash flows and discounts them using a rate that reflects current market conditions. The projection uses management's estimates of economic and market conditions over the projected period including growth rates in loans and deposits, estimates of future expected changes in net interest margins and cash expenditures. Key assumptions used by the Company in its discounted cash flow model (income approach) included an annual loan growth rate that ranged from
3.00%
to
3.60%
, an annual deposit growth rate that ranged from
2.20%
to
3.20%
and a return on assets that ranged from
0.80%
to
1.00%
. In addition to the above projections of estimated operating results, key assumptions used to determine the fair value estimate under the income approach were the discount rate of
12.2%
and the residual capitalization rate of 9.2%. The discount rate used was the cost of equity capital. The cost of equity capital was based on the capital asset pricing model ("CAPM"), modified to account for a small stock premium. The small stock premium represents the additional return required by investors for small stocks based on the
2015 Valuation Handbook - Guide to Cost of Capital
. Beyond the approximate five-year forecast period, residual free cash flows were estimated to increase at a constant rate into perpetuity. These cash flows were converted to a residual value using an appropriate residual capitalization rate. The residual capitalization rate was equal to the discount rate minus the expected long-term growth rate of cash flows. Based on historical results, the economic climate, the outlook for the industry and management's expectations, a long-term growth rate of 3.0% was estimated.
The public company market approach analysis estimates the fair value by applying cash flow multiples to the reporting unit's operating performance. The multiples were derived from comparable publicly traded companies with operating and investment characteristics similar to those of the Company. Key assumptions used by the Company included the selection of comparable public companies and performance ratios. In applying the public company analysis, the Company selected nine publicly traded institutions based on similar lines of business, markets, growth prospects, risks and firm size. The performance ratios included price to earnings (last twelve months), price to earnings (current year to date), price to book value, price to tangible book value and price to deposits.
The merger and acquisition market approach analysis estimates the fair value by using merger and acquisition transactions involving companies that are similar in nature to the Company. Key assumptions used by the Company included the selection of comparable merger and acquisition transactions and the valuation ratios to be used. The analysis used banks located in Washington and Oregon that were acquired after January 1, 2013. The valuation ratios from these transactions for price to earnings and price to tangible book value were then used to derive an estimated fair value of the Company.
The trading price market approach analysis used the closing market price at May 29, 2015 of the Company's common stock, traded on the NASDAQ Global Market to determine the market value of total equity capital.
A key assumption used by the Company in the public company market approach analysis and the trading price market approach analysis was the application of a control premium. The Company's common stock is thinly traded and, therefore, management believes reflects a discount for illiquidity. In addition, the trading price of the Company's common stock reflects a minority interest value. To determine the fair market value of a majority interest in the Company's stock, premiums were calculated and applied to the indicated values. Therefore, a control premium was applied to the results of the discounted cash flow income approach analysis, the public company market approach analysis and the trading price market approach analysis because the initial value conclusion was based on minority interest transactions. Merger and acquisition studies were analyzed to conclude that the difference between the acquisition price and a company's stock price prior to acquisition indicates, in part, the price effect of a controlling interest. Based on the evaluation of mergers and acquisition studies, a control premium of 25% was used.
The Company performed its fiscal year 2015 goodwill impairment test during the quarter ended June 30, 2015 with the assistance of a third-party firm specializing in goodwill impairment valuations for financial institutions. The third-party analysis was conducted as of May 31, 2015 and the step one test concluded that the reporting unit's fair value was more than
16
its recorded value and, therefore, step two of the analysis was not necessary. Accordingly, the recorded value of goodwill as of May 31, 2015 was not impaired.
A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of goodwill impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include, among others: a significant decline in the expected future cash flows; a sustained, significant decline in the Company's stock price and market capitalization; a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate; adverse assessment or action by a regulator; and unanticipated competition. Key assumptions used in the annual goodwill impairment test are highly judgmental and include: selection of comparable companies, amount of control premium, projected cash flows and discount rate applied to projected cash flows. Any change in these indicators or key assumptions could have a significant negative impact on the Company's financial condition, impact the goodwill impairment analysis or cause the Company to perform a goodwill impairment analysis more frequently than once per year.
As of June 30, 2015, management believed that there had been no events or changes in the circumstances since May 31, 2015 that would indicate a potential impairment of goodwill. No assurances can be given, however, that the Company will not record an impairment loss on goodwill in the future.
17
(5) LOANS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Loans receivable and loans held for sale by portfolio segment consisted of the following at
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014
(dollars in thousands):
June 30,
2015
September 30,
2014
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family (1)
$
111,184
16.6
%
$
98,534
16.2
%
Multi-family
50,587
7.6
46,206
7.6
Commercial
293,438
43.9
294,354
48.5
Construction and land development
109,678
16.4
68,479
11.3
Land
27,495
4.1
29,589
4.9
Total mortgage loans
592,382
88.6
537,162
88.5
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
35,040
5.3
34,921
5.7
Other
4,711
0.7
4,699
0.8
Total consumer loans
39,751
6.0
39,620
6.5
Commercial business loans
36,288
5.4
30,559
5.0
Total loans receivable
668,421
100.0
%
607,341
100.0
%
Less:
Undisbursed portion of construction
loans in process
(57,674
)
(29,416
)
Deferred loan origination fees
(2,069
)
(1,746
)
Allowance for loan losses
(10,467
)
(10,427
)
Total loans receivable, net
$
598,211
$
565,752
________________________
(1) Includes loans held for sale.
Construction and Land Development Loan Portfolio Composition
The following table sets forth the composition of the Company’s construction and land development loan portfolio at
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014 (dollars in thousands):
June 30,
2015
September 30,
2014
Amount
Percent
Amount
Percent
Custom and owner/builder
$
62,579
57.1
%
$
59,752
87.3
%
Speculative one- to four-family
5,205
4.8
2,577
3.8
Commercial real estate
18,924
17.2
3,310
4.8
Multi-family
(including condominiums)
22,970
20.9
2,840
4.1
Total construction and
land development loans
$
109,678
100.0
%
$
68,479
100.0
%
18
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following tables set forth information for the
three and nine
months ended
June 30, 2015
and 2014 regarding activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
Beginning
Allowance
Provision
/(Credit)
Charge-
offs
Recoveries
Ending
Allowance
Mortgage loans:
One-to four-family
$
1,596
$
(236
)
$
44
$
137
$
1,453
Multi-family
302
11
—
3
316
Commercial
3,601
89
—
—
3,690
Construction – custom and owner/builder
475
2
—
—
477
Construction – speculative one- to four-family
64
15
—
—
79
Construction – commercial
37
185
—
—
222
Construction – multi-family
129
235
—
—
364
Land
2,753
(321
)
24
21
2,429
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
797
4
7
—
794
Other
190
(1
)
3
1
187
Commercial business loans
438
17
—
1
456
Total
$
10,382
$
—
$
78
$
163
$
10,467
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2015
Beginning
Allowance
Provision
/(Credit)
Charge-
offs
Recoveries
Ending
Allowance
Mortgage loans:
One-to four-family
$
1,650
$
(259
)
$
201
$
263
$
1,453
Multi-family
387
(74
)
—
3
316
Commercial
4,836
(1,146
)
—
—
3,690
Construction – custom and owner/builder
450
27
—
—
477
Construction – speculative one- to four-family
52
27
—
—
79
Construction – commercial
78
144
—
—
222
Construction – multi-family
25
339
—
—
364
Land
1,434
991
28
32
2,429
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
879
(58
)
27
—
794
Other
176
16
8
3
187
Commercial business loans
460
(7
)
—
3
456
Total
$
10,427
$
—
$
264
$
304
$
10,467
19
Three Months Ended June 30, 2014
Beginning
Allowance
Provision
/(Credit)
Charge-
offs
Recoveries
Ending
Allowance
Mortgage loans:
One-to four-family
$
1,751
$
213
$
356
$
42
$
1,650
Multi-family
433
(31)
—
—
402
Commercial
5,168
(4)
—
—
5,164
Construction – custom and owner/builder
348
(15)
—
—
333
Construction – speculative one- to four-family
46
10
—
—
56
Construction – commercial
25
13
—
—
38
Construction – multi-family
—
(110)
—
125
15
Land
1,568
(83)
5
4
1,484
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
868
(7)
—
—
861
Other
194
(4)
2
2
190
Commercial business loans
348
18
—
4
370
Total
$
10,749
$
—
$
363
$
177
$
10,563
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2014
Beginning
Allowance
Provision
/(Credit)
Charge-
offs
Recoveries
Ending
Allowance
Mortgage loans:
One-to four-family
$
1,449
$
987
$
979
$
193
$
1,650
Multi-family
749
(347)
—
—
402
Commercial
5,275
348
463
4
5,164
Construction – custom and owner/builder
262
71
—
—
333
Construction – speculative one- to four-family
96
(40)
—
—
56
Construction – commercial
56
(18)
—
—
38
Construction – multi-family
—
(236)
—
251
15
Construction – land development
—
(287)
—
287
—
Land
1,940
(607)
260
411
1,484
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
782
100
28
7
861
Other
200
(8)
4
2
190
Commercial business loans
327
37
14
20
370
Total
$
11,136
$
—
$
1,748
$
1,175
$
10,563
20
The following tables present information on the loans evaluated individually and collectively for impairment in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment at
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
Allowance for Loan Losses
Recorded Investment in Loans
Individually
Evaluated for
Impairment
Collectively
Evaluated for
Impairment
Total
Individually
Evaluated for
Impairment
Collectively
Evaluated for
Impairment
Total
June 30, 2015
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
467
$
986
$
1,453
$
5,029
$
106,155
$
111,184
Multi-family
17
299
316
4,046
46,541
50,587
Commercial
195
3,495
3,690
12,290
281,148
293,438
Construction – custom and owner/builder
—
477
477
157
38,157
38,314
Construction – speculative one- to four-family
—
79
79
—
2,268
2,268
Construction – commercial
—
222
222
—
7,261
7,261
Construction – multi-family
—
364
364
—
4,161
4,161
Land
1,449
980
2,429
4,937
22,558
27,495
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
152
642
794
669
34,371
35,040
Other
25
162
187
36
4,675
4,711
Commercial business loans
—
456
456
—
36,288
36,288
Total
$
2,305
$
8,162
$
10,467
$
27,164
$
583,583
$
610,747
September 30, 2014
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
709
$
941
$
1,650
$
7,011
$
91,523
$
98,534
Multi-family
39
348
387
3,317
42,889
46,206
Commercial
797
4,039
4,836
17,188
277,166
294,354
Construction – custom and owner/builder
—
450
450
—
34,553
34,553
Construction – speculative one- to four-family
—
52
52
—
1,204
1,204
Construction – commercial
—
78
78
—
2,887
2,887
Construction – multi-family
—
25
25
—
419
419
Land
300
1,134
1,434
5,158
24,431
29,589
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
162
717
879
797
34,124
34,921
Other
—
176
176
3
4,696
4,699
Commercial business loans
—
460
460
—
30,559
30,559
Total
$
2,007
$
8,420
$
10,427
$
33,474
$
544,451
$
577,925
21
Credit Quality Indicators
The Company uses credit risk grades which reflect the Company’s assessment of a loan’s risk or loss potential. The Company categorizes loans into risk grade categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends, among other factors such as the estimated fair value of the collateral. The Company uses the following definitions for credit risk ratings as part of the ongoing monitoring of the credit quality of its loan portfolio:
Pass: Pass loans are defined as those loans that meet acceptable quality underwriting standards.
Watch: Watch loans are defined as those loans that still exhibit acceptable quality, but have some concerns that justify greater attention. If these concerns are not corrected, a potential for further adverse categorization exists. These concerns could relate to a specific condition peculiar to the borrower, its industry segment or the general economic environment.
Special Mention: Special mention loans are defined as those loans deemed by management to have some potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the payment prospects of the loan. Assets in this category do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant a substandard classification.
Substandard: Substandard loans are defined as those loans that are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor, or of the collateral pledged. Loans classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the repayment of the debt. If the weakness or weaknesses are not corrected, there is the distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained.
Loss: Loans in this classification are considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this loan even though partial recovery may be realized in the future.
22
The following table lists the loan credit risk grades utilized by the Company that serve as credit quality indicators by portfolio segment at
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
Loan Grades
June 30, 2015
Pass
Watch
Special
Mention
Substandard
Total
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
104,979
$
937
$
1,030
$
4,238
$
111,184
Multi-family
41,823
1,672
6,332
760
50,587
Commercial
272,952
8,080
6,680
5,726
293,438
Construction – custom and owner/builder
38,157
—
—
157
38,314
Construction – speculative one- to four-family
2,268
—
—
—
2,268
Construction – commercial
7,261
—
—
—
7,261
Construction – multi-family
4,161
—
—
—
4,161
Land
19,565
1,221
2,093
4,616
27,495
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
33,006
636
406
992
35,040
Other
4,672
—
—
39
4,711
Commercial business loans
36,156
50
82
—
36,288
Total
$
565,000
$
12,596
$
16,623
$
16,528
$
610,747
September 30, 2014
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
90,340
$
1,749
$
1,045
$
5,400
$
98,534
Multi-family
37,336
1,697
6,410
763
46,206
Commercial
266,467
5,819
15,946
6,122
294,354
Construction – custom and owner/builder
34,553
—
—
—
34,553
Construction – speculative one- to four-family
1,204
—
—
—
1,204
Construction – commercial
2,887
—
—
—
2,887
Construction – multi-family
419
—
—
—
419
Land
21,084
114
3,586
4,805
29,589
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
33,207
724
27
963
34,921
Other
4,657
39
—
3
4,699
Commercial business loans
30,355
112
92
—
30,559
Total
$
522,509
$
10,254
$
27,106
$
18,056
$
577,925
23
The following tables present an age analysis of past due status of loans by portfolio segment at
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014 (dollars in thousands):
30–59
Days
Past Due
60-89
Days
Past Due
Non-
Accrual (1)
Past Due
90 Days
or More
and Still
Accruing
Total
Past Due
Current
Total
Loans
June 30, 2015
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
—
$
162
$
3,141
$
48
$
3,351
$
107,833
$
111,184
Multi-family
—
—
760
—
760
49,827
50,587
Commercial
—
884
462
—
1,346
292,092
293,438
Construction – custom and owner/builder
—
—
157
—
157
38,157
38,314
Construction – speculative one- to four- family
—
—
—
—
—
2,268
2,268
Construction – commercial
—
—
—
—
—
7,261
7,261
Construction – multi-family
—
—
—
—
—
4,161
4,161
Land
96
31
4,200
34
4,361
23,134
27,495
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
32
—
374
406
812
34,228
35,040
Other
—
—
36
—
36
4,675
4,711
Commercial business loans
—
2
—
—
2
36,286
36,288
Total
$
128
$
1,079
$
9,130
$
488
$
10,825
$
599,922
$
610,747
September 30, 2014
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
—
$
577
$
4,376
$
—
$
4,953
$
93,581
$
98,534
Multi-family
—
—
—
—
—
46,206
46,206
Commercial
—
695
1,468
812
2,975
291,379
294,354
Construction – custom and owner/
builder
—
156
—
—
156
34,397
34,553
Construction – speculative one- to four- family
—
—
—
—
—
1,204
1,204
Construction – commercial
—
—
—
—
—
2,887
2,887
Construction – multi-family
—
—
—
—
—
419
419
Land
357
27
4,564
—
4,948
24,641
29,589
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
62
44
498
—
604
34,317
34,921
Other
42
—
3
—
45
4,654
4,699
Commercial business loans
21
—
—
—
21
30,538
30,559
Total
$
482
$
1,499
$
10,909
$
812
$
13,702
$
564,223
$
577,925
______________________
(1) Includes non-accrual loans past due 90 days or more and other loans classified as non-accrual.
Impaired Loans
A loan is considered impaired when (based on current information and events) it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all contractual principal and interest payments due in accordance with the original or modified terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the collateral less the estimated cost to sell if the loan is considered collateral dependent. Impaired loans that are not considered to be collateral dependent are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows.
The categories of non-accrual loans and impaired loans overlap, although they are not coextensive. The Company considers all circumstances regarding the loan and borrower on an individual basis when determining whether an impaired loan should be placed on non-accrual status, such as the financial strength of the borrower, the estimated collateral value, reasons for the delay, payment record, the amount past due and the number of days past due.
24
The following is a summary of information related to impaired loans by portfolio segment as of
June 30, 2015
and for the
three and nine
months then ended (in thousands):
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid Principal Balance (Loan Balance Plus Charge Off)
Related
Allowance
QTD Average Recorded Investment (1)
YTD Average Recorded Investment (2)
QTD Interest Income Recognized (1)
YTD Interest Income Recognized (2)
QTD Cash Basis Interest Income Recognized (1)
YTD Cash Basis Interest Income Recognized (2)
With no related allowance recorded:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
1,388
$
1,589
$
—
$
1,799
$
2,249
$
6
$
18
$
6
$
18
Multi-family
760
1,613
—
760
380
3
3
3
3
Commercial
7,258
8,319
—
9,070
10,042
117
406
94
324
Construction – custom and owner/
builder
157
157
—
157
118
—
—
—
—
Land
627
1,075
—
736
895
4
21
3
16
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
234
483
—
247
316
—
—
—
—
Other
—
500
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
Commercial business loans
—
7
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Subtotal
10,424
13,743
—
12,769
14,001
130
448
106
361
With an allowance recorded:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
3,641
3,641
467
4,097
4,181
31
112
23
85
Multi-family
3,286
3,286
17
3,291
3,301
47
135
35
100
Commercial
5,032
5,032
195
3,347
3,595
68
129
51
97
Construction – custom and owner/
builder
—
—
—
34
17
—
—
—
—
Land
4,310
4,310
1,449
4,212
4,145
10
22
8
18
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
435
435
152
437
441
4
13
3
11
Other
36
36
25
37
19
—
—
—
—
Subtotal
16,740
16,740
2,305
15,455
15,699
160
411
120
311
25
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid Principal Balance (Loan Balance Plus Charge Off)
Related
Allowance
QTD Average Recorded Investment (1)
YTD Average Recorded Investment (2)
QTD Interest Income Recognized (1)
YTD Interest Income Recognized (2)
QTD Cash Basis Interest Income Recognized (1)
YTD Cash Basis Interest Income Recognized (2)
Total
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
5,029
$
5,230
$
467
$
5,896
$
6,430
$
37
$
130
$
29
$
103
Multi-family
4,046
4,899
17
4,051
3,681
50
138
38
103
Commercial
12,290
13,351
195
12,417
13,637
185
535
145
421
Construction – custom and owner/
builder
157
157
—
191
135
—
—
—
—
Land
4,937
5,385
1,449
4,948
5,040
14
43
11
34
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
669
918
152
684
757
4
13
3
11
Other
36
536
25
37
20
—
—
—
—
Commercial business loans
—
7
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Total
$
27,164
$
30,483
$
2,305
$
28,224
$
29,700
$
290
$
859
$
226
$
672
________________________________________________
(1)
For the three months ended
June 30, 2015
.
(2)
For the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
.
26
The following table is a summary of information related to impaired loans by portfolio segment as of and for the year ended September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid Principal Balance (Loan Balance Plus Charge Off)
Related
Allowance
YTD
Average
Recorded
Investment (1)
YTD Interest
Income
Recognized
(1)
YTD Cash Basis Interest Income Recognized (1)
With no related allowance recorded:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
2,647
$
3,301
$
—
$
3,763
$
—
$
—
Multi-family
—
857
—
—
—
—
Commercial
11,057
14,184
—
7,859
414
325
Construction – multi-family
—
—
—
57
—
—
Construction – land development
—
—
—
141
—
—
Land
1,079
1,674
—
1,044
12
10
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
351
574
—
276
—
—
Other
3
3
—
7
—
—
Commercial business loans
—
10
—
22
—
—
Subtotal
15,137
20,603
—
13,169
426
335
With an allowance recorded:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
4,364
4,364
709
4,140
146
110
Multi-family
3,317
3,317
39
4,157
220
165
Commercial
6,131
6,131
797
10,083
541
423
Construction – speculative one- to four-family
—
—
—
275
11
7
Land
4,079
4,079
300
3,780
18
16
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
446
446
162
404
16
12
Subtotal
18,337
18,337
2,007
22,839
952
733
Total
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
7,011
7,665
709
7,903
146
110
Multi-family
3,317
4,174
39
4,157
220
165
Commercial
17,188
20,315
797
17,942
955
748
Construction – speculative one- to four-family
—
—
—
275
11
7
Construction – multi-family
—
—
—
57
—
—
Construction – land development
—
—
—
141
—
—
Land
5,158
5,753
300
4,824
30
26
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
797
1,020
162
680
16
12
Other
3
3
—
7
—
—
Commercial business loans
—
10
—
22
—
—
Total
$
33,474
$
38,940
$
2,007
$
36,008
$
1,378
$
1,068
______________________________________________
(1) For the year ended September 30, 2014.
27
The following table sets forth information with respect to the Company’s non-performing assets at
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014 (dollars in thousands):
June 30,
2015
September 30,
2014
Loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis:
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
3,141
$
4,376
Multi-family
760
—
Commercial
462
1,468
Construction – custom and owner/builder
157
—
Land
4,200
4,564
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
374
498
Other
36
3
Total loans accounted for on a non-accrual basis
9,130
10,909
Accruing loans which are contractually
past due 90 days or more
488
812
Total of non-accrual and 90 days past due loans
9,618
11,721
Non-accrual investment securities
979
1,101
OREO and other repossessed assets, net
8,063
9,092
Total non-performing assets (1)
$
18,660
$
21,914
Troubled debt restructured loans on accrual status (2)
$
12,392
$
16,804
Non-accrual and 90 days or more past
due loans as a percentage of loans receivable
1.58
%
2.03
%
Non-accrual and 90 days or more past
due loans as a percentage of total assets
1.22
%
1.57
%
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets
2.36
%
2.94
%
Loans receivable (3)
$
608,678
$
576,179
Total assets
$
789,787
$
745,565
___________________________________
(1) Does not include troubled debt restructured loans on accrual status.
(2) Does not include troubled debt restructured loans totaling
$1.4 million
and
$2.3 million
reported as non-accrual loans at
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014, respectively.
(3) Includes loans held for sale and before the allowance for loan losses.
Troubled debt restructured loans are loans for which the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial condition, has granted a significant concession to the borrower that it would otherwise not consider. The loan terms which have been modified or restructured due to a borrower’s financial difficulty include but are not limited to: a reduction in the stated interest rate; an extension of the maturity at an interest rate below current market; a reduction in the face amount of the debt; a reduction in the accrued interest; or re-aging, extensions, deferrals and renewals. Troubled debt restructured loans are considered impaired loans and are individually evaluated for impairment. Troubled debt restructured loans can be classified
28
as either accrual or non-accrual. Troubled debt restructured loans are classified as non-performing loans unless they have been performing in accordance with their modified terms for a period of at least six months. The Company had
$13.75 million
and
$19.09 million
in troubled debt restructured loans included in impaired loans at
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014, respectively, and had
no
commitments at these dates to lend additional funds on these loans. The allowance for loan losses allocated to troubled debt restructured loans at
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014 was
$332,000
and
$994,000
, respectively.
The following tables set forth information with respect to the Company’s troubled debt restructured loans by interest accrual status as of
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
June 30, 2015
Accruing
Non-
Accrual
Total
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
1,888
$
829
$
2,717
Multi-family
3,286
—
3,286
Commercial
6,186
115
6,301
Land
736
260
996
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
296
152
448
Total
$
12,392
$
1,356
$
13,748
September 30, 2014
Accruing
Non-
Accrual
Total
Mortgage loans:
One- to four-family
$
2,634
$
233
$
2,867
Multi-family
3,317
—
3,317
Commercial
9,960
1,468
11,428
Land
594
431
1,025
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
299
152
451
Total
$
16,804
$
2,284
$
19,088
The following tables set forth information with respect to the Company’s troubled debt restructured loans by portfolio segment that occurred during the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
and the year ended September 30, 2014 (dollars in thousands):
June 30, 2015
Number of
Contracts
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Post- Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
End of
Period
Balance
Commercial (1)
1
$
415
$
116
$
116
Total
1
$
415
$
116
$
116
September 30, 2014
One-to four-family (1)
1
$
42
$
42
$
42
Land (1)
1
157
157
153
Total
2
$
199
$
199
$
195
___________________________
(1)
Modifications were a result of a reduction in the stated interest rate and/or collateral change.
29
(6) NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without considering any dilutive items. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing net income to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares and common stock equivalents for items that are dilutive, net of shares assumed to be repurchased using the treasury stock method at the average share price for the Company’s common stock during the period. The dividend and related accretion for the amount of the Company's Series A Preferred Stock outstanding for the respective period was deducted from net income in computing net income to common shareholders. Common stock equivalents arise from the assumed conversion of outstanding stock options and the outstanding warrant to purchase common stock. Shares owned by the Bank’s ESOP that have not been allocated are not considered to be outstanding for the purpose of computing basic and diluted net income per common share. At
June 30, 2015
and 2014, there were
149,734
and
187,807
shares, respectively, that had not been allocated under the Bank’s ESOP.
Information regarding the calculation of basic and diluted net income per common share for the
three and nine
months ended
June 30, 2015
and 2014 is as follows (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
Basic net income per common share computation
Numerator – net income
$
2,159
$
1,434
$
5,337
$
4,204
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
—
(136
)
Preferred stock discount accretion
—
—
—
(70
)
Net income to common shareholders
$
2,159
$
1,434
$
5,337
$
3,998
Denominator – weighted average
common shares outstanding
6,902,067
6,857,149
6,897,381
6,855,811
Basic net income per common share
$
0.31
$
0.21
$
0.77
$
0.58
Diluted net income per common share computation
Numerator – net income
$
2,159
$
1,434
$
5,337
$
4,204
Preferred stock dividends
—
—
—
(136
)
Preferred stock discount accretion
—
—
—
(70
)
Net income to common shareholders
$
2,159
$
1,434
$
5,337
$
3,998
Denominator – weighted average
common shares outstanding
6,902,067
6,857,149
6,897,381
6,855,811
Effect of dilutive stock options (1)
36,490
38,582
36,680
36,070
Effect of dilutive stock warrant
132,664
137,982
134,760
123,274
Weighted average common shares
and common stock equivalents
7,071,221
7,033,713
7,068,821
7,015,155
Diluted net income per common share
$
0.31
$
0.20
$
0.76
$
0.57
____________________________________________
(1) For both the
three and nine
months ended
June 30, 2015
, average options to purchase
172,945
and
138,982
shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the
three and nine
months ended
June 30, 2014
, average options to purchase
126,000
and
131,489
shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of diluted net income per common share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
30
(7) STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Stock Compensation Plans
Under the Company’s prior stock compensation plans (the 1999 Stock Option Plan, the 2003 Stock Option Plan and the MRDP), the Company was able to grant options and awards for restricted stock for up to a combined total of
2,151,500
shares of common stock to employees, officers, directors and directors emeriti. Under the Company's 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (collectively with the 1999 Stock Option Plan, the 2003 Stock Option Plan and the MRDP, "the Plans"), which was approved by shareholders on January 27, 2015, the Company is able to grant options, awards of restricted stock and awards of restricted stock with performance measures for up to 352,366 shares of common stock to employees, officers, directors and directors emeriti. Shares issued may be purchased in the open market or may be issued from authorized and unissued shares. The exercise price of each option equals the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. At
June 30, 2015
, there were 276,366 shares available for future grant under the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan. There are no options or awards for restricted stock available for future grant under the 1999 Stock Option Plan, the 2003 Stock Option Plan, or the MRDP.
Activity under the Plans for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
and 2014 is as follows:
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2015
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2014
Shares
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Shares
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Options outstanding, beginning of period
221,400
$
7.49
162,946
$
6.96
Exercised
(6,300
)
4.84
(3,600
)
4.65
Granted
76,000
10.55
135,000
9.29
Forfeited
(200
)
4.55
(66,046
)
9.97
Options outstanding, end of period
290,900
$
8.35
228,300
$
7.50
Options exercisable, end of period
73,700
$
6.48
38,300
$
4.90
The aggregate intrinsic value of options outstanding at
June 30, 2015
was
$534,000
.
At
June 30, 2015
, there were
217,200
unvested options with an aggregate grant date fair value of
$498,000
, all of which the Company assumes will vest. The aggregate intrinsic value of unvested options at
June 30, 2015
was
$268,000
. There were
42,900
options with an aggregate grant date fair value of
$100,000
that vested during the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
.
At
June 30, 2014
, there were
190,000
unvested options with an aggregate grant date fair value of
$464,000
. There were
14,600
options with an aggregate grant date fair value of
$26,000
that vested during the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards with the weighted average assumptions noted in the following table. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury rate of a similar term as the stock option at the particular grant date. The expected life is based on historical data, vesting terms and estimated exercise dates. The expected dividend yield is based on the most recent quarterly dividend on an annualized basis in effect at the time the options were granted, adjusted, if appropriate for management's expectations regarding future dividends. The expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock price. There were
76,000
options granted during the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
with an aggregate grant date fair value of
$150,000
. There were
135,000
options granted during the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
with an aggregate grant date fair value of
$349,000
.
The weighted average assumptions used for options granted during the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015 and 2014 were:
31
2015
2014
Expected volatility
29
%
39
%
Expected term (in years)
5
5
Expected dividend yield
3.22
%
2.51
%
Risk free interest rate
1.43
%
1.41
%
Grant date fair value per share
$
1.97
$
2.59
At both
June 30,
2015 and 2014, there were
no
unvested MRDP shares and no shares available for future awards. There were
3,254
MRDP shares that vested during the
nine months ended
June 30,
2014 with an aggregated grant date fair value of
$23,000
.
Expense for Stock Compensation Plans
Compensation expense during the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
and 2014 for all stock-based plans were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Nine Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Stock
Options
Stock
Grants
Stock
Options
Stock
Grants
Compensation expense
$
91
$
—
$
76
$
2
Less: related tax benefit recognized
(2
)
—
—
—
Total
$
89
$
—
$
76
$
2
As of
June 30, 2015
, the compensation expense yet to be recognized for stock options that have been awarded but not vested for the years ending September 30 is as follows (in thousands):
Stock
Options
Remainder of 2015
$
34
2016
136
2017
128
2018
97
2019
39
2020
17
Total
$
451
32
(8) FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
GAAP requires disclosure of estimated fair values for financial instruments. Such estimates are subjective in nature, and significant judgment is required regarding the risk characteristics of various financial instruments at a discrete point in time. Therefore, such estimates could vary significantly if assumptions regarding uncertain factors were to change. In addition, as the Company normally intends to hold the majority of its financial instruments until maturity, it does not expect to realize many of the estimated amounts disclosed. The disclosures also do not include estimated fair value amounts for certain items which are not defined as financial instruments but which may have significant value. The Company does not believe that it would be practicable to estimate a representational fair value for these types of items as of
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014. Because GAAP excludes certain items from fair value disclosure requirements, any aggregation of the fair value amounts presented would not represent the underlying value of the Company.
Accounting guidance regarding fair value measurements defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with GAAP. Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The following definitions describe the levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting
entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2: Significant observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, such as
quoted prices in markets that are not active, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable or
can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own assumptions about the
assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on the best information
available in the circumstances.
The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value on a recurring basis:
Investment Securities Available for Sale
The estimated fair value of investment securities available for sale are based upon the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the security. Such assumptions include quoted market prices (Level 1), market prices of similar securities or observable inputs (Level 2).
Mutual Funds
The estimated fair value of mutual funds are based upon quoted market prices (Level 1).
The following table summarizes the balances of assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis at
June 30, 2015
(in thousands):
Estimated Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Available for sale investment securities
MBS:
U.S. government agencies
$
—
$
438
$
—
$
438
Mutual funds
963
—
—
963
Total
$
963
$
438
$
—
$
1,401
There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 during the three and nine months ended
June 30, 2015
.
33
The following table summarizes the balances of assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
Estimated Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
Available for sale investment securities
MBS:
U.S. government agencies
$
—
$
1,899
$
—
$
1,899
Mutual funds
958
—
—
958
Total
$
958
$
1,899
$
—
$
2,857
There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 during the year ended September 30, 2014.
The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. These include assets that are measured at the lower of cost or market value that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period.
The Company uses the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value on a non-recurring basis:
Impaired Loans
: The specific reserve for collateral dependent impaired loans is based on the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell, if applicable. The estimated fair value of impaired loans is calculated using the collateral value method or on a discounted cash flow basis. In some cases, adjustments are made to the appraised values due to various factors including age of the appraisal, age of comparables included in the appraisal, and known changes in the market and in the collateral. Such adjustments may be significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value. Impaired loans are evaluated on a quarterly basis for additional impairment and adjusted accordingly.
Investment Securities:
The estimated fair value of investment securities is based upon the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the security. Such assumptions include quoted market prices (Level 1), market prices of similar securities or observable inputs (Level 2) and unobservable inputs such as dealer quotes, discounted cash flows or similar techniques (Level 3).
OREO and Other Repossessed Assets, net:
The Company’s OREO and other repossessed assets are initially recorded at estimated fair value less estimated costs to sell. This amount becomes the property’s new basis. Estimated fair value was generally determined by management based on a number of factors, including third-party appraisals of estimated fair value in an orderly sale. Estimated costs to sell were based on standard market factors. The valuation of OREO and other repossessed assets is subject to significant external and internal judgment (Level 3).
34
The following table summarizes the balances of assets measured at estimated fair value on a non-recurring basis at
June 30, 2015
, and the total losses resulting from these estimated fair value adjustments for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
(in thousands):
Estimated Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total Losses
Impaired loans:
Mortgage loans:
One-to four-family
$
—
$
—
$
3,174
$
201
Multi-family
—
—
3,269
—
Commercial
—
—
4,837
—
Land
—
—
2,861
28
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
—
—
283
27
Other
11
8
Total impaired loans (1)
—
—
14,435
264
Investment securities – held to maturity (2):
MBS - private label residential
—
31
—
5
OREO and other repossessed assets (3)
—
—
8,063
490
Total
$
—
$
31
$
22,498
$
759
_______________________
(1)
The loss represents charge-offs on collateral dependent loans for estimated fair value adjustments based on the estimated fair value of the collateral, net of estimated costs to sell, if applicable. Fair value is the recorded investment less the related allowance.
(2)
The loss represents OTTI credit-related charges on held to maturity MBS.
(3)
The loss represents adjustments resulting from management’s periodic reviews of the recorded value to determine whether the property continues to be recorded at the lower of its recorded book value or estimated fair value, net of estimated costs to sell.
The following table summarizes the balances of assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a non-recurring basis at September 30, 2014, and the total losses resulting from these estimated fair value adjustments for the year ended September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
Estimated Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total Losses
Impaired loans:
Mortgage loans:
One-to four-family
$
—
$
—
$
3,655
$
1,106
Multi-family
—
—
3,278
—
Commercial
—
—
5,334
463
Land
—
—
3,779
260
Consumer loans:
Home equity and second mortgage
—
—
284
47
Total impaired loans (1)
—
—
16,330
1,876
Investment securities – held to maturity (2):
MBS - private label residential
—
40
—
31
OREO and other repossessed assets (3)
—
—
9,092
605
Total
$
—
$
40
$
25,422
$
2,512
_______________________
35
(1)
The loss represents charge-offs on collateral dependent loans for estimated fair value adjustments based on the estimated fair value of the collateral, net of estimated costs to sell, if applicable. Fair value is the recorded investment less the related allowance.
(2)
The loss represents OTTI credit-related charges on held to maturity MBS.
(3)
The loss represents adjustments resulting from management’s periodic reviews of the recorded value to determine whether the property continues to be recorded at the lower of its recorded book value or estimated fair value, net of estimated costs to sell.
The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Estimated
Fair Value
Valuation
Technique(s)
Unobservable Input(s)
Range
Impaired loans
$
14,435
Market approach
Appraised value of underlying collateral less selling costs
NA
OREO and other repossessed assets
$
8,063
Market approach
Lower of appraised value or listing price less selling costs
NA
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair value of its other financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
The estimated fair value of financial instruments that are short-term or re-price frequently and that have little or no risk are considered to have an estimated fair value equal to the recorded value.
CDs Held for Investment:
The estimated fair value of financial instruments that are short-term or re-price frequently and that have little or no risk are considered to have an estimated fair value equal to the recorded value.
Investment securities:
See descriptions above.
FHLB Stock:
No ready market exists for this stock, and it has no quoted market value. However, redemption of this stock has historically been at par value. During the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
, 25,463 shares of FHLB stock were redeemed from the Company at par value. Accordingly, par value is deemed to be a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Loans Receivable, Net:
The fair value of non-impaired loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers for the same remaining maturities. Prepayments are based on the historical experience of the Bank. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using the methods described above.
Loans Held for Sale:
The estimated fair value is based on quoted market prices obtained from the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
Accrued Interest:
The recorded amount of accrued interest approximates the estimated fair value.
Deposits
: The estimated fair value of deposits with no stated maturity date is included at the amount payable on demand. The estimated fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is computed by discounting future cash flows using the rates currently offered by the Bank for deposits of similar remaining maturities.
FHLB Advances:
The estimated fair value of FHLB advances is computed by discounting the future cash flows of the borrowings at a rate which approximates the current offering rate of the borrowings with a comparable remaining life.
Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments:
Since the majority of the Company’s off-balance-sheet instruments consist of variable-rate commitments, the Company has determined that they do not have a distinguishable estimated fair value.
36
The estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows as of
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014 (in thousands):
June 30, 2015
Fair Value Measurements Using:
Recorded
Amount
Estimated Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
76,173
$
76,173
$
76,173
$
—
$
—
CDs held for investment
47,053
47,053
47,053
—
—
Investment securities
9,419
10,359
3,716
6,643
—
FHLB stock
2,699
2,699
2,699
—
—
Loans receivable, net
594,376
601,820
—
—
601,820
Loans held for sale
3,835
3,918
3,918
—
—
Accrued interest receivable
2,132
2,132
2,132
—
—
Financial liabilities
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing demand
$
122,133
$
122,133
$
122,133
$
—
$
—
Interest-bearing
532,585
533,174
376,597
—
156,577
Total deposits
654,718
655,307
498,730
—
156,577
FHLB advances
45,000
46,758
—
46,758
—
Accrued interest payable
288
288
288
—
—
September 30, 2014
Fair Value Measurements Using:
Recorded
Amount
Estimated Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Financial assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
72,354
$
72,354
$
72,354
$
—
$
—
CDs held for investment
35,845
35,845
35,845
—
—
Investment securities
8,155
9,131
958
8,173
—
FHLB stock
5,246
5,246
5,246
—
—
Loans receivable, net
564,853
571,411
—
—
571,411
Loans held for sale
899
921
921
—
—
Accrued interest receivable
1,910
1,910
1,910
—
—
Financial liabilities
Deposits:
Non-interest-bearing demand
$
106,417
$
106,417
$
106,417
$
—
$
—
Interest-bearing
508,699
509,406
345,412
—
163,994
Total deposits
615,116
615,823
451,829
—
163,994
FHLB advances
45,000
47,279
—
47,279
—
Accrued interest payable
298
298
298
—
—
37
(9) RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In January 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-01,
Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20)
. The ASU eliminates the need to separately classify, present and disclose extraordinary events. The disclosure of events or transactions that are unusual or infrequent in nature will be included in other guidance. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU No. 2015-01 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02,
Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis
. The ASU is intended to improve targeted areas of consolidation guidance for legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (collateralized debt obligations, collateralized loan obligations, and mortgage-backed security transactions). The ASU focuses on the consolidation evaluation for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. In addition to reducing the number of consolidation models from four to two, the new standard simplifies the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and improves current GAAP by placing more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest. ASU No. 2015-02 will be effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015 for public companies. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The adoption of ASU No. 2015-02 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.
In June 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-10,
Technical Corrections and Improvements
. On November 10, 2010, the FASB added a standing project that will facilitate the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("Codification") updates for technical corrections, clarifications and improvements. These amendments are referred to as Technical Corrections and Improvements. Maintenance updates include non-substantive corrections to the Codification, such as editorial corrections, various link-related changes, and changes to source fragment information. This update contains amendments that will affect a wide variety of Topics in the Codification. The amendments in this ASU will apply to all reporting entities within the scope of the affected accounting guidance and generally fall into one of four categories; amendments related to differences between original guidance and the Codification, guidance clarification and reference corrections, simplification, and minor improvements. In summary, the amendments in this ASU represent changes to clarify the Codification, correct unintended application of guidance, or make minor improvements to the Codification that are not expected to have a significant effect on current accounting practice. Transaction guidance varies based on the amendments in this ASU. The amendments in this ASU that require transition guidance are effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within these fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted including adoption in an interim period. All other amendments are effective upon the issuance of this ASU. The adoption of ASU 2015-10 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
As used in this Form 10-Q, the terms “we,” “our” and “Company” refer to Timberland Bancorp, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise. When we refer to “Bank” in this Form 10-Q, we are referring to Timberland Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Timberland Bancorp, Inc. and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Timberland Service Corporation.
The following analysis discusses the material changes in the condensed consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company at and for the
three and nine
months ended
June 30, 2015
. This analysis as well as other sections of this report contains certain “forward-looking statements.”
Certain matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 concerning our future operations. These statements relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, are based on certain assumptions and often include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about future economic performance and projections of financial items. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and
38
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or implied by our forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to: the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs and changes in our allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses that may be impacted by deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets which may lead to increased losses and non-performing assets in our loan portfolio, and may result in our allowance for loan losses not being adequate to cover actual losses, and require us to materially increase our loan loss reserves; changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas; changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short and long term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources; fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes, land and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas; secondary market conditions for loans and our ability to sell loans in the secondary market; results of examinations of us by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("Federal Reserve") and of our bank subsidiary by the FDIC, the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Division of Banks or other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such regulatory authority may, among other things, institute an informal or formal enforcement action against us or our bank subsidiary which could require us to increase our allowance for loan losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position or affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits or impose additional requirements and restrictions on us, any of which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business including changes in regulatory policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules, including as a result of Basel III; the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and implementing regulations; our ability to attract and retain deposits; increases in premiums for deposit insurance; our ability to control operating costs and expenses; the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation; difficulties in reducing risk associated with the loans on our consolidated balance sheet; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our work force and potential associated charges; the failure or security breach of computer systems on which we depend; our ability to retain key members of our senior management team; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; our ability to implement our business strategies; our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel we may acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames and any goodwill charges related thereto; our ability to manage loan delinquency rates; increased competitive pressures among financial services companies; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions; our ability to pay dividends on our common stock; adverse changes in the securities markets; inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the FASB, including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; the economic impact of war or any terrorist activities; other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations; pricing, products and services; and other risks detailed in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our 2014 Form 10-K.
Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this Form 10-Q and in the other public statements we make are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements included in this report or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These risks could cause our actual results for fiscal 2015 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements by, or on behalf of us, and could negatively affect the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations as well as its stock price performance.
Overview
Timberland Bancorp, Inc., a Washington corporation, is the holding company for Timberland Bank. The Bank opened for business in 1915 and serves consumers and businesses across Grays Harbor, Thurston, Pierce, King, Kitsap and Lewis counties, Washington with a full range of lending and deposit services through its 22 branches (including its main office in Hoquiam). At
June 30, 2015
, the Company had total assets of
$789.79 million
and total shareholders’ equity of
$87.29 million
. The Company’s business activities generally are limited to passive investment activities and oversight of its investment in the Bank. Accordingly, the information set forth in this report relates primarily to the Bank’s operations.
The profitability of the Company’s operations depends primarily on its net interest income after provision for loan losses. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, which is the income that the Company earns on interest-earning assets, which are primarily loans and investments, and interest expense, the amount the Company pays on its interest-bearing
39
liabilities, which are primarily deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is affected by changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets, interest earned on those assets, the volume and mix of interest-bearing liabilities and interest paid on those interest-bearing liabilities. Management strives to match the re-pricing characteristics of the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities to protect net interest income from changes in market interest rates and changes in the shape of the yield curve.
The provision for loan losses is dependent on changes in the loan portfolio and management’s assessment of the collectability of the loan portfolio as well as prevailing economic and market conditions. The provision for loan losses reflects the amount that the Company believes is adequate to cover estimated credit losses in its loan portfolio.
Net income is also affected by non-interest income and non-interest expenses. For the
three and nine
month period ended
June 30, 2015
, non-interest income consisted primarily of service charges on deposit accounts, gain on sale of loans, ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees, an increase in the cash surrender value of BOLI and other operating income. Non-interest income is reduced by net OTTI losses on investment securities and losses on the sale of investment securities. Non-interest expenses consisted primarily of salaries and employee benefits, premises and equipment, advertising, ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees, OREO and other repossessed asset expenses, postage and courier expenses, state and local taxes, professional fees, FDIC insurance premiums, other insurance premiums, loan administration and foreclosure expenses, deposit operation expenses and data processing expenses and telecommunication expenses. Non-interest expenses are reduced by gains on the sale of premises and equipment. Non-interest income and non-interest expenses are affected by the growth of our operations and growth in the number of loan and deposit accounts.
Results of operations may be affected significantly by general and local economic and competitive conditions, changes in market interest rates, governmental policies and actions of regulatory authorities.
The Bank is a community-oriented bank which has traditionally offered a variety of savings products to its retail customers while concentrating its lending activities on real estate mortgage loans. Lending activities have been focused primarily on the origination of loans secured by real estate, including residential construction loans, one- to four-family residential loans, multi-family loans and commercial real estate loans. The Bank originates adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans that do not qualify for sale in the secondary market. The Bank also originates commercial business loans and other consumer loans.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Company has identified several accounting policies that as a result of judgments, estimates and assumptions inherent in those policies, are critical to an understanding of the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in the Company’s 2014 Form 10-K under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.” That discussion highlights estimates the Company makes that involve uncertainty or potential for substantial change. There have been no material changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates as previously disclosed in the Company’s 2014 Form 10-K.
Comparison of Financial Condition at
June 30, 2015
and September 30, 2014
The Company’s total assets
increased
by
$44.22 million
, or
5.9%
, to
$789.79 million
at
June 30, 2015
from
$745.57 million
at
September 30, 2014
. The increase in total assets was primarily due to increases in net loans receivable, CDs held for investment and total cash and cash equivalents, which were partially offset by decreases in FHLB stock and OREO and other repossessed assets.
Net loans receivable
increased
by
$32.46 million
, or
5.7%
, to
$598.21 million
at
June 30, 2015
from
$565.75 million
at
September 30, 2014
. The increase was primarily due to increases in construction and land development loans, one- to four-family loans, commercial business loans and multi-family loans. These increases to net loans receivable were partially offset by decreases in land loans and commercial real estate loans.
Total deposits
increased
by
$39.60 million
, or
6.4%
, to
$654.72 million
at
June 30, 2015
from
$615.12 million
at
September 30, 2014
. The increase was primarily a result of increases in non-interest bearing demand account, money market account, savings account and N.O.W. account balances, which were partially offset by a decrease in certificates of deposit account balances.
40
Shareholders’ equity
increased
by
$4.51 million
, or
5.5%
, to
$87.29 million
at
June 30, 2015
from
$82.78 million
at
September 30, 2014
. The increase in shareholders' equity was primarily due to net income of $5.34 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2015, which was partially offset by dividend payments of $1.20 million to shareholders of our common stock.
A more detailed explanation of the changes in significant balance sheet categories follows:
Cash and Cash Equivalents and CDs Held for Investment:
Cash and cash equivalents and CDs held for investment
increased
by
$15.03 million
, or
13.9%
, to
$123.23 million
at
June 30, 2015
from
$108.20 million
at
September 30, 2014
. The increase was primarily due to a $3.82 million increase in cash and cash equivalents and a $11.21 million increase in CDs held for investment.
Investment Securities:
Investment securities
increased
by
$1.26 million
, or
15.5%
, to
$9.42 million
at
June 30, 2015
from $
8.16 million
at
September 30, 2014
, primarily due to the purchase of a $3.00 million U.S. Treasury security. This increase was partially offset by the sale of $1.22 million in agency mortgaged-backed securities and scheduled amortization and prepayments. The sale of the investment securities resulted in a $45,000 gain during the nine months ended June 30, 2015. For additional information on investment securities, see Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in “Item 1, Financial Statements.”
FHLB Stock
: FHLB stock decreased by $2.55 million, or 48.6%, to $2.70 million at June 30, 2015 from $5.25 million at September 30, 2014, primarily due to stock redemptions by the FHLB. On June 1, 2015, the FHLB of Seattle merged into the FHLB of Des Moines and excess stock was redeemed by the FHLB.
Loans:
Net loans receivable
increased
by
$32.46 million
, or
5.7%
, to
$598.21 million
at
June 30, 2015
from
$565.75 million
at
September 30, 2014
. The increase in the portfolio was primarily a result of a $41.20 million increase in construction and land development loans (mostly multi-family construction loans and commercial real estate construction loans), a $12.65 million increase in one- to four-family loans, a $5.73 million increase in commercial business loans, and a $4.38 million increase in multi-family loans. These increases in net loans receivable were partially offset by a a $2.09 million decrease in land loans and a $916,000 decrease in commercial real estate loans. In addition, there was a $28.26 million increase in the undisbursed portion of construction loans in process.
Loan originations
increased
$81.44 million
, or
64.9%
, to
$206.83 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
$125.39 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
. The Company continued to sell longer-term fixed rate one- to four-family mortgage loans for asset liability management purposes and to generate non-interest income. Sales of fixed rate one- to four-family mortgage loans
increased
$14.16 million
, or
60.8%
, to
$37.46 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to
$23.30 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
as refinance demand for single family loans increased.
For additional information, see Note 5 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in “Item 1, Financial Statements.”
Premises and Equipment:
Premises and equipment
decreased
by
$596,000
, or
3.4%
, to
$17.08 million
at
June 30, 2015
from
$17.68 million
at
September 30, 2014
. The decrease was primarily due to normal depreciation and the sale of excess land adjacent to the Company's Lacey branch office.
OREO (Other Real Estate Owned):
OREO and other repossessed assets
decreased
by
$1.03 million
, or
11.3%
, to
$8.06 million
at
June 30, 2015
from $9.09 million at
September 30, 2014
. The decrease was primarily due to the disposition of 14 OREO properties totaling $2.11 million and OREO fair value write-downs of $490,000, partially offset by the addition of $1.56 million in OREO properties and other repossessed assets. At
June 30, 2015
, total OREO and other repossessed assets consisted of
33
individual properties and one other repossessed asset. The properties consisted of
21
land parcels totaling
$3.52 million
,
four
commercial real estate properties totaling
$2.04 million
,
eight
single-family homes totaling
$2.43 million
and
one
mobile home with a book value of
$67,000
.
Goodwill and CDI:
The recorded amount of goodwill of $5.65 million at
June 30, 2015
was unchanged from September 30, 2014. The recorded amount of the CDI
decreased
$3,000
, or
100.0%
, to none at
June 30, 2015
from
$3,000
at
September 30, 2014
. The decrease was due to scheduled amortization of the CDI.
Deposits:
Deposits
increased
by
$39.60 million
, or
6.4%
, to
$654.72 million
at
June 30, 2015
from
$615.12 million
at
September 30, 2014
. The increase was primarily a result of a $15.72 million increase in non-interest bearing accounts, a $14.05 million increase in money market accounts, a $9.11 million increase in savings accounts and a $8.03 million increase in N.O.W. checking accounts. These increases were partially offset by a $7.30 million decrease in certificates of deposit accounts.
41
FHLB Advances:
The Company has short- and long-term borrowing lines with the FHLB with total credit available on the lines equal to 25% of the Bank’s total assets, limited by available collateral. Borrowings are considered short-term when the original maturity is less than one year. At
June 30, 2015
, FHLB advances and other borrowings consisted of long-term FHLB advances with scheduled maturities at various dates in fiscal 2017, which bear interest at rates ranging from 3.69% to 4.34%. A portion of these advances may be called by the FHLB at a date earlier than the scheduled maturity date. FHLB advances remained unchanged at $45.00 million at
June 30, 2015
and
September 30, 2014
.
Shareholders’ Equity:
Total shareholders’ equity
increased
by
$4.51 million
, or
5.5%
, to
$87.29 million
at
June 30, 2015
from
$82.78 million
at
September 30, 2014
. The increase was primarily due to net income of $5.34 million for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
, which was partially offset by the payment of $1.20 million in dividends on the Company's common stock.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Three and
Nine Months Ended
June 30, 2015
and 2014
Net income to common shareholders
increased
$725,000
, or
50.6%
, to
$2.16 million
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
from
$1.43 million
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
. Net income per diluted common share
increased
$0.11
, or
55.0%
, to
$0.31
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
from
$0.20
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
. The increase in net income was primarily due to increases in net interest income and non-interest income and to a lesser extent, a decrease in non-interest expense.
Net income
increased
$1.13 million
, or
27.0%
, to
$5.34 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
$4.20 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
. Net income to common shareholders
increased
$1.34 million
, or
33.5%
, to
$5.34 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
$4.00 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
. Net income per diluted common share
increased
$0.19
, or
33.3%
, to
$0.76
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
$0.57
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
. The increase in net income was primarily due to increases in net interest income and non-interest income, and to a lesser extent, a decrease in non-interest expense.
For the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014, net income available to common shareholders was net of a dividend accrual and discount accretion related to the Series A Preferred Stock of $206,000, or approximately $0.03 per diluted common share. These preferred stock adjustments were not required in the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015 due to the redemption of the remaining Series A Preferred Stock in December 2013.
A more detailed explanation of the income statement categories is presented below.
Net Interest Income:
Net interest income
increased
by
$551,000
, or
8.6%
, to
$6.98 million
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
from
$6.43 million
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
. The net interest margin
increased
to
3.88%
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
from
3.86%
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
, primarily due to the collection of non-accrual interest, which increased the net interest margin for the current quarter by approximately nine basis points.
Total interest and dividend income
increased
by
$550,000
, or
7.4%
, to
$7.95 million
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
from
$7.40 million
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
, primarily due to $53.66 million increase in the average balance of total interest-bearing assets to $720.31 million from $666.65 million, which was partially offset by a decrease in the average yield on interest-bearing assets to
4.41%
from
4.44%
. Also contributing to the increase in interest and dividend income was the collection of $159,000 of non-accrual interest during the current quarter. Total interest expense
decreased
by
$1,000
, or
0.1%
, to
$963,000
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
from
$964,000
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
as the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities
decreased
to
0.68%
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
from
0.70%
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
, and the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities
increased
by
$21.81 million
.
Net interest income
increased
by
$924,000
, or
4.8%
, to
$20.25 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
$19.33 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
. The net interest margin for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
decreased
to
3.81%
from
3.83%
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
.
Total interest and dividend income
increased
by
$870,000
, or
3.9%
, to
$23.16 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
$22.29 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
, primarily due to a $34.72 million increase in the average balance of total interest-bearing assets to $707.88 million from $673.16 million, which was partially offset by a decrease in the average yield on interest-bearing assets to
4.36%
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
4.41%
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
. Also contributing to the increase in interest and dividend income was the collection of $284,000 of non-accrual interest during the nine months ended June 30, 2015. Total interest expense decreased by
$54,000
, or
1.8%
, to
$2.91 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
$2.96 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
as the average rate paid
42
on interest bearing liabilities
decreased
to
0.69%
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
0.72%
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
.
Average Balances, Interest and Average Yields/Cost
The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities as well as the total dollar amounts of interest income from average interest-bearing assets and interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities and average yields and costs. Such yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense by the average daily balance of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. (Dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Average
Balance
Interest and
Dividends
Yield/
Cost
Average
Balance
Interest and
Dividends
Yield/
Cost
Interest-bearing assets: (1)
Loans receivable (2)
$
600,740
$
7,756
5.16
%
$
566,887
$
7,238
5.11
%
Investment securities (2)
6,677
59
3.53
7,573
66
3.49
Dividends from mutual funds and FHLB stock
5,599
7
0.50
6,332
6
0.38
Interest-bearing deposits
107,295
125
0.47
85,854
87
0.41
Total interest-bearing assets
720,311
7,947
4.41
666,646
7,397
4.44
Non-interest-bearing assets
57,130
63,000
Total assets
$
777,441
$
729,646
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings accounts
$
104,306
14
0.05
$
92,744
12
0.05
Money market accounts
95,341
71
0.30
94,181
61
0.26
N.O.W. checking accounts
167,003
112
0.27
156,932
107
0.27
Certificates of deposit
158,990
295
0.74
159,977
318
0.80
Long-term borrowings (3)
45,000
471
4.20
45,000
466
4.15
Total interest-bearing liabilities
570,640
963
0.68
548,834
964
0.70
Non-interest-bearing liabilities
120,708
100,152
Total liabilities
691,348
648,986
Shareholders' equity
86,093
80,660
Total liabilities and
shareholders' equity
$
777,441
$
729,646
Net interest income
$
6,984
$
6,433
Interest rate spread
3.73
%
3.74
%
Net interest margin (4)
3.88
%
3.86
%
Ratio of average interest-bearing
assets to average interest-bearing
liabilities
126.23
%
121.47
%
43
Nine Months Ended June 30,
2015
2014
Average
Balance
Interest and
Dividends
Yield/
Cost
Average
Balance
Interest and
Dividends
Yield/
Cost
Interest-bearing assets: (1)
Loans receivable (2)
$
591,483
$
22,617
5.10
%
$
565,990
$
21,811
5.14
%
Investment securities (2)
6,481
179
3.70
6,606
190
3.83
Dividends from mutual funds and FHLB stock
5,979
21
0.47
6,362
21
0.44
Interest-bearing deposits
103,937
343
0.44
94,205
268
0.38
Total interest-bearing assets
707,880
23,160
4.36
673,163
22,290
4.41
Non-interest-bearing assets
58,424
62,112
Total assets
$
766,304
$
735,275
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings accounts
$
100,636
39
0.05
$
91,794
34
0.05
Money market accounts
92,750
194
0.28
95,501
184
0.26
N.O.W. checking accounts
163,917
331
0.27
156,397
334
0.29
Certificates of deposit
161,486
932
0.77
164,200
1,010
0.82
Long-term borrowings (3)
45,000
1,411
4.19
45,000
1,399
4.16
Total interest-bearing liabilities
563,789
2,907
0.69
552,892
2,961
0.72
Non-interest-bearing liabilities
117,844
99,433
Total liabilities
681,633
652,325
Shareholders' equity
84,671
82,950
Total liabilities and
shareholders' equity
$
766,304
$
735,275
Net interest income
$
20,253
$
19,329
Interest rate spread
3.67
%
3.69
%
Net interest margin (4)
3.81
%
3.83
%
Ratio of average interest-bearing
assets to average interest-bearing
liabilities
125.56
%
121.75
%
_______________
(1)
Does not include interest on loans on non-accrual status. Includes loans originated for sale. Amortized net deferred loan fees, late fees, extension fees and prepayment penalties are included with interest and dividends.
(2)
Average balances include loans and investment securities on non-accrual status.
(3)
Includes FHLB advances with original maturities of one year or greater.
(4)
Net interest income divided by total average interest-bearing assets, annualized.
44
Rate Volume Analysis
The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on the net interest income of the Company. Information is provided with respect to the (i) effects on interest income attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), (ii) effects on interest income attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume), and (iii) the net change (sum of the prior columns). Changes in rate/volume have been allocated to rate and volume variances based on the absolute values of each. (In thousands)
Three months ended June 30, 2015
compared to three months
ended June 30, 2014
increase (decrease) due to
Nine months ended June 30, 2015
compared to nine months
ended June 30, 2014
increase (decrease) due to
Rate
Volume
Net
Change
Rate
Volume
Net
Change
Interest-bearing assets:
Loans receivable (1)
$
82
$
436
$
518
$
24
$
782
$
806
Investment securities
1
(8
)
(7
)
(7
)
(4
)
(11
)
Dividends from mutual funds and FHLB stock
2
(1
)
1
—
—
—
Interest-bearing deposits
14
24
38
46
29
75
Total net increase in income on interest-bearing assets
99
451
550
63
807
870
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Savings accounts
—
2
2
2
3
5
N.O.W. checking accounts
(2
)
7
5
(7
)
4
(3
)
Money market accounts
9
1
10
10
—
10
Certificates of deposit accounts
(21
)
(2
)
(23
)
(61
)
(17
)
(78
)
Long term FHLB borrowings
5
—
5
12
—
12
Total net increase (decrease) in expense on interest-bearing liabilities
(9
)
8
(1
)
(44
)
(10
)
(54
)
Net increase in net interest income
$
108
$
443
$
551
$
107
$
817
$
924
(1) Includes loans originated for sale.
Provision for Loan Losses:
There was no provision for loan losses for the quarters ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
. There were net recoveries for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
of $85,000 compared to net charge-offs of $186,000 for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
.
There was no provision for loan losses for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
and
2014
. There were net recoveries of $40,000 for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
compared to net charge-offs of $573,000 for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
.
The Company has established a comprehensive methodology for determining the provision for loan losses. On a quarterly basis the Company performs an analysis that considers pertinent factors underlying the quality of the loan portfolio. The factors include changes in the amount and composition of the loan portfolio, historical loss experience for various loan segments, changes in economic conditions, delinquency rates, a detailed analysis of impaired loans, and other factors to determine an appropriate level of allowance for loan losses. Based on its comprehensive analysis, management believes the allowance for loan losses of $10.47 million at
June 30, 2015
(1.72% of loans receivable and loans held for sale and 109% of non-performing loans) was adequate to provide for
probable losses based on an evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio at that date. Impaired loans are subjected to an impairment analysis to determine an appropriate reserve amount to be allocated to each loan. The aggregate principal impairment reserve amount determined at
June 30, 2015
was $2.31 million compared to $2.85 million at
June 30, 2014
. The allowance for loan losses was $10.56 million (1.86% of loans receivable and loans held for sale and 86.3% of non-performing loans) at
June 30, 2014
.
45
While management believes the estimates and assumptions used in its determination of the adequacy of the allowance are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will not be proved incorrect in the future, or that the actual amount of future provisions will not exceed the amount of past provisions or that any increased provisions that may be required will not adversely impact the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the determination of the amount of the Company’s allowance for loan losses is subject to review by bank regulators as part of the routine examination process, which may result in the establishment of additional reserves based upon their analysis of information available to them at the time of their examination. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses would adversely affect the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations. For additional information, see Note 5 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in “Item 1, Financial Statements.”
Non-interest Income:
Total non-interest income
increased
$407,000
, or
19.2%
, to
$2.52 million
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
from
$2.12 million
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
. The increase in non-interest income was primarily due to a $273,000 increase in gain on sale of loans and an $80,000 increase in ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees. The increase in gain on sale of loans was primarily due to an increase in the dollar volume of fixed-rate one-to four-family loans sold during the current quarter. The increase in ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees was primarily due to an increase in debit card transactions.
Total non-interest income
increased
$536,000
, or
8.5%
, to
$6.86 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
$6.32 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
. This increase in non-interest income was primarily due to a $384,000 increase in gain on sale of loans, a $195,000 increase in ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees and smaller increases in several other categories, which was partially offset by a $160,000 decrease in service charges on deposits. The decrease in service charges on deposit was primarily due to a decreased number of checking account overdrafts.
Non-interest Expense:
Total non-interest expense
decreased
by
$210,000
, or
3.3%
, to
$6.22 million
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
from
$6.43 million
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
. The decreased expenses were primarily due to a $299,000 gain on sale of premises and equipment, a $129,000 decrease in salaries and employee benefit expense and smaller decreases in several other categories. These decreases were partially offset by a $129,000 increase in ATM and debit card interchange transaction fee expense and smaller increases in several other categories. The gain on the sale of premises and equipment was a result of the sale of excess land adjacent to the Company's Lacey branch. The decrease in salaries and employee benefit expense was primarily due to an increase in loan originations, which increased capitalized loan origination costs.
Under GAAP, the portion of a loan origination fee that is attributable to the estimated employee costs to generate the loan is recorded as a reduction of salaries and employee benefits expense. With t
he increase in loan originations, the loan originations fees that reduced salaries and employee benefit expense increased by $241,000.
The increase in ATM and debit card interchange fee expense was primarily due to increased processing volumes and increased debit card fraud related expenses.
Total non-interest expense
decreased
$278,000
, or
1.4%
, to
$19.15 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
$19.43 million for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
.
The decreased expenses were primarily due to a $299,000 gain on sale of premises and equipment, a $261,000 decrease in salaries and employee benefit expense, a $178,000 decrease in OREO and other repossessed assets expense and a $170,000 decrease in loan administration and foreclosure expense. These decreases were partially offset by a $241,000 increase in data processing and telecommunications expense, a $140,000 increase in premises and equipment expense and a $138,000 increase in ATM and debit card processing expense.
Provision for Federal Income Taxes:
The provision for federal income taxes
increased
by
$443,000
, or
64.7%
, to $
1.13 million
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
from
$685,000
for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
, primarily as a result of increased income before federal income taxes. The Company's effective tax rate was 34.32% for the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
and 32.33% for the quarter ended
June 30, 2014
.
The provision for federal income taxes
increased
by
$605,000
, or
29.9%
, to
$2.63 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
from
$2.02 million
for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
. The Company's effective tax rate was 33.00% for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2015
and 32.50% for the
nine months ended
June 30, 2014
.
Liquidity
The Company’s primary sources of funds are customer deposits, proceeds from principal and interest payments on loans and investment securities, proceeds from the sale of loans, proceeds from maturing securities and maturing CDs held for
46
investment, FHLB advances, and other borrowings. While maturities and the scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.
Liquidity management is both a short and long-term responsibility of the Bank’s management. The Bank adjusts its investments in liquid assets based upon management’s assessment of (i) expected loan demand, (ii) projected loan sales, (iii) expected deposit flows, and (iv) yields available on interest-bearing deposits. Excess liquidity is invested generally in interest-bearing overnight deposits and other short-term investments.
The Bank generally maintains sufficient cash and short-term investments to meet short-term liquidity needs. At
June 30, 2015
, the Bank’s regulatory liquidity ratio (net cash, and short-term and marketable assets, as a percentage of net deposits and short-term liabilities) was 18.63%.
The Company’s total cash and cash equivalents increased by
$3.82 million
, or
5.3%
, to
$76.17 million
at
June 30, 2015
from
$72.35 million
at September 30, 2014. If the Bank requires funds that exceed its ability to generate them internally, it has additional borrowing capacity with the FHLB, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco ("FRB") and Pacific Coast Bankers' Bank ("PCBB"). At
June 30, 2015
, the Bank maintained an uncommitted credit facility with the FHLB that provided for immediately available advances up to an aggregate amount equal to 35% of total assets, limited by available collateral. The Bank also has a Letter of Credit ("LOC") of up to $15 million with the FHLB for the purpose of collateralizing Washington State public deposits. Any amount pledged for public deposit under the LOC reduces the Bank's available borrowing amount under the FHLB advance agreement. At June 30, 2015, the Bank had $45 million in advances outstanding and $15 million pledged under the LOC, which left $207.57 million available for additional borrowings. The Bank maintains a short-term borrowing line with the FRB with available total credit based on eligible collateral. At
June 30, 2015
, the Bank had $46.08 million available for borrowings with the FRB and there was no outstanding balance on this borrowing line. The Bank also maintains a $10 million overnight borrowing line with PCBB. At
June 30, 2015
, the Bank did not have an outstanding balance on this borrowing line.
The Bank’s primary investing activity is the origination of one- to four-family mortgage loans, commercial mortgage loans, construction loans, consumer loans, and commercial business loans. At
June 30, 2015
, the Bank had loan commitments totaling $66.04 million and undisbursed construction loans in process totaling $57.67 million. The Bank anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet current loan commitments. CDs that are scheduled to mature in less than one year from
June 30, 2015
totaled $97.34 million. Historically, the Bank has been able to retain a significant amount of its non-brokered CDs as they mature. At
June 30, 2015
, the Bank had $3.20 million in brokered CDs.
Capital Resources
Timberland Bank, as a state-chartered, federally insured savings bank, is subject to the capital requirements established by the FDIC.
Effective January 1, 2015 (with some changes transitioned into full effectiveness over two to four years), the Bank became subject to new capital adequacy requirements. The capital adequacy requirements are quantitative measures established by regulation that require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of capital.
The Bank is now subject to new capital requirements adopted by the FDIC, which create a new required ratio for common equity Tier 1 ("CET1") capital, increases the leverage and Tier 1 capital ratios, changes the risk-weightings of certain assets for purposes of the risk-based capital ratios, creates an additional capital conservation buffer over the required capital ratios and changes what qualifies as capital for purpose of meeting these various capital requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by bank regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. The Bank is required to maintain additional levels of Tier 1 common equity over the minimum risk-based capital levels before it may pay dividends, repurchase shares or pay discretionary bonuses.
The new minimum requirements are a ratio of CET1 capital to total risk-weighted assets (the "CET1 risk-based ratio") of 4.5%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%, a total capital ratio of 8.0%, and a leverage ratio of 4.0%
In addition to the capital requirements, there are a number of changes in what constitutes regulatory capital, subject to transition periods. These changes include the phasing-out of certain instruments as qualifying capital. The Bank does not have any of these instruments. Mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets over designated percentages of CET1 will be deducted from capital, subject to a four-year transition period. CET1 will consist of Tier 1 capital less all capital components that are not
47
considered common equity. In addition, Tier 1 capital will include accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), which includes all unrealized gains and losses on available for sale debt and equity securities, subject to a four-year transition period. Because of our asset size, we are not required to follow the advance approach and elected in the first quarter of calendar year 2015 to take the one-time option of deciding to permanently opt-out of the inclusion of unrealized gains and losses on available for sale debt and equity securities in our capital calculations.
The new requirements also include changes in the risk-weighting of assets to better reflect credit risk and other risk exposure. These include a 150% risk weight (up from 100%) for certain high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans and for non-residential mortgage loans that are 90 days or more past due or otherwise on non-accrual status; a 20% (up from 0%) credit conversion factor for the unused portion of a commitment with an original maturity of one year or less that is not unconditionally cancellable; and a 250% risk weight (up from 100%) for mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets that are not deducted from capital.
In addition to the minimum CET1, Tier 1 and total capital ratios, the Bank will have to maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional CET1 capital equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses based on percentages of eligible retained earnings that could be utilized for such actions. This new capital conservation buffer requirement is to be phased in beginning in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and increasing each year until fully implemented in January 2019.
Under the new standards, in order to be considered well-capitalized, the Bank must have a CET1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.5% (new), a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% (increased from 6.0%), a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% (unchanged) and a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 5.0% (unchanged).
At
June 30, 2015
, the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. The Bank was categorized as "well capitalized" at
June 30, 2015
under the regulations of the FDIC.
The following table compares the Bank’s actual capital amounts at
June 30, 2015
to its minimum regulatory capital requirements at that date (dollars in thousands):
Actual
Regulatory
Minimum To
Be “Adequately
Capitalized”
To Be “Well Capitalized”
Under Prompt
Corrective Action
Provisions
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
Leverage Capital Ratio:
Tier 1 capital
$80,641
10.44
%
$30,903
4.00
%
$38,629
5.00
%
Risk-based Capital Ratios:
Common equity tier 1 capital
80,641
13.32
27,248
4.50
39,358
6.50
Tier 1 capital
80,641
13.32
36,330
6.00
48,440
8.00
Total capital
88,249
14.57
48,440
8.00
60,550
10.00
Timberland Bancorp, Inc. is a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve. Bank holding companies are subject to capital adequacy requirements of the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and the regulations of the Federal Reserve. For a bank holding company with less than $1.0 billion in assets, the capital guidelines apply on a bank only basis and the Federal Reserve expects the holding company's subsidiary bank to be well capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations. If Timberland Bancorp, Inc. were subject to regulatory guidelines for bank holding companies with $1.0 billion or more in assets, at
June 30, 2015
, Timberland Bancorp, Inc. would have exceeded all regulatory requirements.
48
The following table presents the regulatory capital ratios for Timberland Bancorp, Inc. as of
June 30, 2015
(dollars in thousands):
Actual
Amount
Ratio
Leverage Capital Ratio:
Tier 1 capital
$83,306
10.77
%
Risk-based Capital Ratios:
Common equity tier 1 capital
83,306
13.76
Tier 1 capital
83,306
13.76
Total capital
90,916
15.01
Key Financial Ratios and Data
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended
June 30,
Nine Months Ended
June 30,
2015
2014
2015
2014
PERFORMANCE RATIOS
:
Return on average assets (1)
1.11
%
0.79
%
0.93
%
0.76
%
Return on average equity (1)
10.03
%
7.12
%
8.40
%
6.76
%
Net interest margin (1)
3.88
%
3.86
%
3.81
%
3.83
%
Efficiency ratio
65.43
%
75.21
%
70.62
%
75.27
%
At
June 30,
2015
At
September 30,
2014
At
June 30,
2014
BOOK VALUES:
Book value per common share
$12.38
$11.75
$11.54
Tangible book value per common share (2)
11.57
10.94
10.74
______________________
(1)
Annualized
(2)
Calculat
i
on subtracts goodwill and core deposit intangible from the equity component.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There were no material changes in information concerning market risk from the information provided in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
: An evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and several other members of the Company’s senior management as of the end of the period covered by this report. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of
June 30, 2015
the
49
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.
(b)
Changes in Internal Controls
: There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended
June 30, 2015
, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. The Company continued, however, to implement suggestions from its internal auditor and independent auditors to strengthen existing controls. The Company does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns in controls or procedures can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; as over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Neither the Company nor the Bank is a party to any material legal proceedings at this time. From time to time,
the Bank is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the Risk Factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of the Company’s
2014 Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None to be reported.
50
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits
3.1
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (1)
3.3
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (3)
4.1
Warrant to purchase shares of Company’s common stock dated December 23, 2008 (2)
4.2
Letter Agreement (including Securities Purchase Agreement Standard Terms attached as Exhibit A) dated December 23, 2008 between the Company and the United States Department of the Treasury (2)
10.1
Employee Severance Compensation Plan, as revised (4)
10.2
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (4)
10.3
1999 Stock Option Plan (5)
10.4
Management Recognition and Development Plan (5)
10.5
2003 Stock Option Plan (6)
10.6
Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (7)
10.7
Form of Non-qualified Stock Option Agreement (7)
10.8
Form of Management Recognition and Development Award Agreement (7)
10.9
Employment Agreement with Michael R. Sand (8)
10.10
Employment Agreement with Dean J. Brydon (8)
10.11
Timberland Bancorp, Inc. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (9)
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes OxleyAct
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act
101
The following materials from Timberland Bancorp Inc's Quarterly Report 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, formatted on Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) (a) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (b) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income; (c) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (d) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity; (e) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (f) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (10)
_________________
(1)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333- 35817).
(2)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2008.
(3)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 29, 2010.
(4)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1997; and to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 13, 2007.
(5)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 1999 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement dated December 15, 1998.
(6)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s 2004 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement dated December 24, 2003.
(7)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2005.
(8)
Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 29, 2013.
(9)
Attached as Appendix A to the Registrant's Annual Meeting Proxy Statement filed on December 19, 2014.
(10)
Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise not subject to liability under those sections.
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Timberland Bancorp, Inc.
Date: August 5, 2015
By:
/s/ Michael R. Sand
Michael R. Sand
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: August 5, 2015
By:
/s/ Dean J. Brydon
Dean J. Brydon
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
52
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No.
Description of Exhibit
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
101
The following materials from Timberland Bancorp Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, formatted on Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) (a) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (b) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income; (c) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (d) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity; (e) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (f) Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements*
* Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise not subject to liability under those sections.
53