Triumph Group - 10-Q quarterly report FY

Part I.  Financial Information

      Item 1.  Financial Statements.

Triumph Group, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in thousands)

1

Triumph Group, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets (continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

2

Triumph Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

3

Triumph Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)

4

Triumph Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

5

Triumph Group, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

6

Triumph Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

1.  BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Triumph Group, Inc. (the “Company”) have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2007.  For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.

2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

ORGANIZATION

The Company designs, engineers and manufactures products for original equipment manufacturers of aircraft and aircraft components and repairs and overhauls aircraft components and accessories for commercial airline, air cargo carrier and military customers on a worldwide basis.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which requires companies to measure compensation cost for all share-based payments (including employee stock options) at fair value for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. In April 2005, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued a rule allowing public companies to delay the adoption of SFAS No. 123R to annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. As a result, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, using the modified-prospective transition method, beginning on April 1, 2006, and therefore, began to expense the fair value of all outstanding options over their remaining vesting periods to the extent the options were not fully vested as of the adoption date and began to expense the fair value of all options granted subsequent to March 31, 2006 over their requisite service periods. During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded $564 of share-based compensation expense. Previous periods have not been restated. (See Note 7 for further details).

RECENTLY ISSUED FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD

In June 2006, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation  No. 48 (“FIN No. 48”), “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.”  This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. FIN No. 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this interpretation.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets cost and accumulated amortization at June 30, 2006 were $86,959 and $36,037, respectively.  Intangible assets cost and accumulated amortization at March 31, 2006 were $83,459 and $34,035, respectively.  Intangible assets consists of two major classes: (i) product rights and licenses, which at June 30, 2006 had a weighted-average life of 11.6 years, and (ii) non-compete agreements, customer relationships and other, which at June 30, 2006 had a weighted-average life of 11.8 years.  Gross cost and accumulated amortization of product rights and licenses at June 30, 2006 were $69,452 and $26,215, respectively, and at March 31, 2006 were $69,452 and $24,631, respectively.  Gross cost and accumulated amortization of noncompete agreements, customer relationships and other at June 30, 2006 were $17,507 and $9,822,

7

Triumph Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

2.  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

respectively, and at March 31, 2006 were $14,007 and $9,404, respectively.  Amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $2,002 and $1,821, respectively.  Amortization expense for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 and the succeeding five fiscal years by year is expected to be as follows: 2007: $7,966; 2008: $7,923; 2009: $7,032; 2010: $6,797; 2011: $5,006; 2012: $3,588.

RECLASSIFICATIONS

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year amounts in order to conform to the current year presentation.

8

Triumph Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

3.  ACQUISITIONS

Effective April 1, 2006, the Company acquired the assets and business of Excel Manufacturing, Inc., through a newly organized, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, Triumph Structures — Wichita, Inc.  The acquisition of this business adds a significant new capability to the Company’s Aerospace Systems segment with the acquired company’s high-speed monolithic machining processes.  Triumph Structures-Wichita, Inc. specializes in complex, high speed monolithic precision machining, turning, subassemblies and sheet metal fabrication, serving domestic and international aerospace customers.  The Company also acquired the assets and business of Air Excellence International, Inc. and its affiliates through two newly organized, wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company, Triumph Interiors, LLC and Triumph Interiors Limited.  The acquisition of this business expands the products and services supplied by our Aftermarket Services segment and allows the Company to provide integrated interior solutions to the airline industry and maintenance service providers.  Triumph Interiors, LLC and Triumph Interiors Limited specialize in refurbishing and repairing aircraft interiors such as sidewalls, ceiling panels and overhead storage bins and manufactures a full line of interior lighting and plastic components.  The acquisitions of the assets and businesses of Excel Manufacturing, Inc. and Air Excellence International, Inc. and its affiliates are herein referred to as the 2006 Acquisitions.  The combined purchase price of the “2006 Acquisitions” of $39,493 includes cash paid at closing, liabilities assumed and direct costs of the transactions.  The excess of the combined purchase price over the preliminary estimated fair value of the net assets acquired of $25,139 was recorded as goodwill, all of which is tax-deductible.  The Company has also identified intangible assets valued at approximately $3,500 comprised of noncompete agreements, customer relationships, and backlog.  The Company has recorded its best estimate of the intangibles and property and equipment subject to appraisals; accordingly, the allocation of the purchase price is not complete and is subject to change.

The following condensed balance sheet represents the amounts assigned to each major asset and liability caption in the aggregate for the 2006 Acquisitions:

These acquisitions have been accounted for under the purchase method and, accordingly, are included in the consolidated financial statements from their effective dates of acquisition.  These acquisitions were funded by the Company’s long-term borrowings in place at the date of each respective acquisition.

The following unaudited pro forma information for the three months ended June 30, 2005 has been prepared assuming the 2006 Acquisitions had occurred on April 1, 2005.  The pro forma information for the three months ended June 30, 2005 is as follows: Net sales: $183,945; Net income: $7,437; Net income per share — basic: $0.47; and Net income per share — diluted: $0.46.

The unaudited pro forma information includes adjustments for interest expense that would have been incurred to finance the purchase, additional depreciation based on the estimated fair market value of the property and equipment acquired, and the amortization of the intangible assets arising from the transactions.  The unaudited

9

Triumph Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations as it would have been had the transaction been effected on the assumed date.

4.  INVENTORIES

The components of inventories are as follows:

5. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following:

On July 27, 2005, the Company amended and restated its existing credit agreement (as amended and restated, the “Credit Facility”) with its lenders to reduce the Credit Facility to $250,000 from $265,000, extend the maturity date to July 27, 2010 and amend certain other terms and covenants.  The Credit Facility bears interest at either (i) LIBOR plus between 0.75% and 1.75% or (ii) the prime rate (or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5% if greater) plus between 0.00% and 0.25% or (iii) an overnight rate at the option of the Company.  The applicable interest rate is based upon the Company’s ratio of total indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.  In addition, the Company is required to pay a commitment fee of between 0.175% and 0.375% on the unused portion of the Credit Facility.  The Company may allocate up to $30,000 of the available Credit Facility for the issuance of letters of credit.  The Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries.

On July 27, 2005, the Company entered into Amendment No. 4 to the Note Purchase Agreement dated as of November 21, 2002.  The amendment reaffirms the Company’s covenants under the Note Purchase Agreement.

10

Triumph Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

6.  EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following is a reconciliation between the weighted average outstanding shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

7.   STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS

The Company has a number of stock-related compensation plans, including stock option and restricted stock plans, which are described in Note 2 and Note 10 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. Through March 31, 2006, the Company accounted for its stock option plans using the intrinsic value method set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” (“APB No. 25”) and related interpretations. Under APB No. 25, generally, when the exercise price of the Company’s stock options equaled the market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant, no compensation expense was recognized. As previously noted, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R, using the modified-prospective transition method, beginning on April 1, 2006, and therefore, began to expense the fair value of all outstanding options over their remaining vesting periods to the extent the options were not fully vested as of the adoption date and began to expense the fair value of all options granted subsequent to March 31, 2006 over their requisite service periods.

SFAS No. 123R also requires the benefits of realized tax deductions in excess of previously recognized tax benefits on compensation expense to be reported as a financing cash flow ($467 for the three months ended June 30, 2006) rather than an operating cash flow, as previously required. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107, the Company classified share-based compensation within selling, general, and administrative expenses to correspond with the same line item as the majority of the cash compensation paid to employees.

Employee options and non-employee director options generally vest over a three-year service period. Compensation expense recognized for all option grants is net of estimated forfeitures and is recognized over the awards’ respective requisite service periods. The fair values relating to the option grants were estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of our stock and other factors, such as implied market volatility. We used historical exercise data based on the age at grant of the option holder to estimate the options’ expected term, which represents the period of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding. We anticipated the future option holding periods to be similar to the historical option holding periods. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. We recognize compensation expense for the fair values of these awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of these awards.

11

Triumph Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

7.   STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)

The following assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of options granted:

Restricted shares generally vest in full after four years. The fair value of restricted shares under the Company’s restricted stock plans is determined by the product of the number of shares granted and the grant date market price of the Company’s common stock. The fair value of restricted shares is expensed on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of four years.

During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded $564 of share-based compensation expense. Total share-based compensation expense was comprised of stock option expense of $161 and restricted stock expense of $403. The Company estimates it will record share-based compensation expense of approximately $2,300 in fiscal 2007. This estimate may be impacted by potential changes to the structure of the Company’s share-based compensation plans which could impact the number of stock options granted in fiscal 2007, changes in valuation assumptions, and changes in the market price of the Company’s common stock, among other things and, as a result, the actual share-based compensation expense in fiscal 2007 may differ from the Company’s current estimate.

The following table illustrates the impact of share-based compensation on reported amounts:

12

Triumph Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

7.   STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information for its option plans for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was as follows:

A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested options as of June 30, 2006 and changes during the three months ended June 30, 2006, is presented below:

Expected future compensation expense relating to the 79,631 nonvested options outstanding as of June 30, 2006 is $1,049.

There are 54,898 nonvested restricted shares outstanding as of June 30, 2006. Expected future compensation expense on these shares is $1,683.

In April 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved the granting of restricted stock to several of its senior executives and employees, the number of shares of which will be determined based upon the Company’s financial performance during fiscal 2007.

For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the stock options are amortized to expense over their assumed vesting periods. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, to all stock-related compensation.

13

Triumph Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

7.   STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)

8.  GOODWILL

The following is a summary of the changes in the carrying value of goodwill from March 31, 2006 through June 30, 2006:

14

Triumph Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

9.  SEGMENTS

The Company has two reportable segments: Aerospace Systems and Aftermarket Services. The Company’s Aerospace Systems segment consists of 28 operating locations and the Aftermarket Services segment consists of 18 operating locations at June 30, 2006.

The Aerospace Systems segment consists of the Company’s operations which manufacture products primarily for the aerospace OEM market. The segment’s operations design and engineer mechanical and electromechanical controls, such as hydraulic systems, main engine gearbox assemblies, accumulators and mechanical control cables. The segment’s revenues are also derived from stretch forming, die forming, milling, bonding, machining, welding and assembly and fabrication of various structural components used in aircraft wings, fuselages and other significant assemblies. Further, the segment’s operations also manufacture metallic and composite bonded honeycomb assemblies for floor panels, fuselage, wings and flight control surface parts. These products are sold to various aerospace OEMs on a global basis.

The Aftermarket Services segment consists of the Company’s operations that provide maintenance, repair and overhaul services to both commercial and military markets on components and accessories manufactured by third parties. Maintenance, repair and overhaul revenues are derived from services on auxiliary power units, aircraft accessories, including constant-speed drives, cabin compressors, starters and generators, and pneumatic drive units. In addition, the segment’s operations repair and overhaul thrust reversers, nacelle components and other aerostructures. The segment’s operations also perform repair and overhaul services, and supply spare parts, for various types of cockpit instruments and gauges for a broad range of commercial airlines on a worldwide basis.

Segment operating income is total segment revenue reduced by operating expenses identifiable with that segment. Corporate includes general corporate administrative costs and any other costs not identifiable with one of the Company’s segments.

The Company evaluates performance and allocates resources based on operating income of each reportable segment, rather than at the operating location level.  The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 2).

Prior year period segment results have been restated to classify certain revenue and costs from the Aftermarket Services segment to the Aerospace Systems segment for the operations of Triumph Fabrications-Phoenix and Triumph Fabrications-Fort Worth due to the fact that most of their product line has been transitioned to aerospace OEM products.  The restatement shifted approximately $4,430 in revenue and $816 in operating loss, previously reported in the Aftermarket Services segment, to the Aerospace Systems segment’s results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2006.

15

Triumph Group, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

9.  SEGMENTS (Continued)

Selected financial information for each reportable segment is as follows:

During the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company had foreign sales of $50,032 and $44,962, respectively.

16

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

(The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein.)

OVERVIEW

We are a major supplier to the aerospace industry and have two operating segments: (i) Triumph Aerospace Systems Group, whose companies design, engineer and manufacture a wide range of proprietary and build to print components, assemblies and systems for the global aerospace OEM market; and (ii) Triumph Aftermarket Services Group, whose companies serve aircraft fleets, notably commercial airlines, the U.S. military and cargo carriers, through the maintenance, repair and overhaul services of aircraft components and accessories manufactured by third parties.

·                  Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 increased 25% to $222.8 million

·                  Operating income in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 increased 33% to $18.3 million

·                  Net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 increased 32% to $9.4 million

·                  Backlog increased 38% during the quarter to $942.7 million

For the quarter ended June 30, 2006, net sales totaled $222.8 million, a 25% increase from last year’s first quarter net sales of $177.7 million.  Net income for the first quarter of fiscal 2007 increased 32% to $9.4 million, or $0.58 per diluted common share, versus $7.2 million, or $0.45 per diluted common share, for the first quarter of the prior year.  During the quarter, we generated $1.1 million of cash flow from operating activities.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared to quarter ended June 30, 2005

17

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)

Changes in net sales and segment operating income are discussed within the “Business Segment Performance” section below.

Corporate general and administrative expenses increased by $0.3 million, or 7.0%, to $4.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from $3.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, primarily due to increased staffing, stock compensation and bonus accruals.

Interest expense and other increased by $0.5 million, or 17.1%, to $3.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 compared to $3.2 million for the prior year period.  This increase was due to higher average borrowings outstanding and increased interest rates on our variable rate debt.

The effective income tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was 35.3% compared to 32.3% for the quarter ended June 30, 2005.  The increase in the tax rate was primarily due to the expiration of the federal research and development tax credit and costs associated with the construction of our new Thailand maintenance and repair facility that were not tax benefited.

Business Segment Performance

The Aerospace Systems segment consists of the Company’s operations which manufacture products primarily for the aerospace OEM market. The Aerospace Systems operations design and engineer mechanical and electromechanical controls, such as hydraulic systems, main engine gearbox assemblies, accumulators and mechanical control cables. The Aerospace Systems revenues are also derived from stretch forming, die forming, milling, bonding, machining, welding and assembly and fabrication of various structural components used in aircraft wings, fuselages and other significant assemblies. Further, the segment’s operations also manufacture metallic and composite bonded honeycomb assemblies for floor panels, fuselage, wings and flight control surface parts. These products are sold to various aerospace OEMs on a global basis.

The Aftermarket Services segment consists of the Company’s operations that provide maintenance, repair and overhaul services to both commercial and military markets on components and accessories manufactured by third parties. Maintenance, repair and overhaul revenues are derived from services on auxiliary power units, aircraft accessories, including constant-speed drives, cabin compressors, starters and generators, and pneumatic drive units. In addition, the Aftermarket Services operations repair and overhaul thrust reversers, nacelle components and other aerostructures. The Aftermarket Services operations also perform repair and overhaul services, and supply spare parts, for various types of cockpit instruments and gauges for a broad range of commercial airlines on a worldwide basis.

18

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)

Prior year period segment results have been restated to classify certain revenue and costs from the Aftermarket Services segment to the Aerospace Systems segment for the operations of Triumph Fabrications-Phoenix and Triumph Fabrications-Fort Worth due to the fact that most of their product line has been transitioned to aerospace OEM products.  The restatement shifted approximately $4.4 million in revenue and $0.8 million in operating loss, previously reported in the Aftermarket Services segment, to the Aerospace Systems segment’s results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2006.

Aerospace Systems: The Aerospace Systems segment net sales increased by $35.6 million, or 25.7%, to $174.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from $138.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The increase was due to the additional sales of $9.6 million associated with the acquisition of the assets and business of Excel Manufacturing, Inc. (now Triumph Structures-Wichita) and an increase in same store sales of $26.0 million due to increased sales of non-structural composites, gear assemblies, volume increases for customers, additional new contracts, and improved completion of backlog.

Aerospace Systems segment operating income increased by $4.9 million, or 31.8%, to $20.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from $15.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Operating income increased due to the operating income of $3.3 million associated with the Triumph Structures-Wichita acquisition and higher margins generated on increased sales volume as described above partially offset by increases in staffing, depreciation and amortization expenses, litigation costs and increased investments in research and development costs.

Aftermarket Services: The Aftermarket Services segment net sales increased by $9.7 million, or 24.3%, to $49.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from $39.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. This increase was due to the sales increase of $2.6 million associated with the acquisition of the assets and business of Air Excellence International, Inc. and its affiliates (now Triumph Interiors), and an increase in same store sales of $7.0 million due to new customers and products, growth in global commercial air traffic and U.S. military maintenance requirements resulting in increased demand for the repair and overhaul of auxiliary power units and the brokering of similar units.

Aftermarket Services segment operating income decreased by $0.1 million, or 2.5%, to $2.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from $2.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The sales increases as discussed above have been offset by lower gross margins and increases in staffing and depreciation.

19

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our working capital needs are generally funded through cash flows from operations and borrowings under our credit arrangements.  During the three months ended June 30, 2006, we generated approximately $0.6 million of cash flows from operating activities, used approximately $55.2 million in investing activities and generated approximately $54.3 million in financing activities.

On July 27, 2005, the Company amended and restated its existing credit agreement (as amended and restated, the “Credit Facility”) with its lenders to reduce the Credit Facility to $250.0 million from $265.0 million, extend the maturity date to July 27, 2010 and amend certain other terms and covenants.  The Credit Facility bears interest at either (i) LIBOR plus between 0.75% and 1.75% or (ii) the prime rate (or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5% if greater) plus between 0.00% and 0.25% or (iii) an overnight rate at the option of the Company.  The applicable interest rate is based upon the Company’s ratio of total indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization.  In addition, the Company is required to pay a commitment fee of between 0.175% and 0.375% on the unused portion of the Credit Facility.  The Company may allocate up to $30.0 million of the available Credit Facility for the issuance of letters of credit.  The Company’s obligations under the Credit Facility are guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries.  As of June 30, 2006, $168.9 million was available under our Credit Facility.  On June 30, 2006, an aggregate amount of approximately $81.1 million was outstanding under the Credit Facility, $75.0 million of which was accruing interest at LIBOR plus applicable basis points totaling 6.4% per annum, and $6.1 million of which was accruing interest at the overnight interest rate of 6.6% per annum.  Amounts repaid under the Credit Facility may be reborrowed.

Capital expenditures were approximately $13.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 primarily for manufacturing machinery and equipment.  We funded these expenditures through borrowings under our Credit Facility.  We expect capital expenditures to be up to $45.0 million for our fiscal year ending March 31, 2007.  The expenditures are expected to be used mainly to expand capacity or replace old equipment at several facilities.

The expected future cash flows for the next five years for long term debt, leases and other obligations are as follows:

(1) Included in the Company’s balance sheet at June 30, 2006.

(2) Includes interest component.

(3) Includes fixed-rate interest only

20

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(continued)

We believe that cash generated by operations and borrowings under the Credit Facility will be sufficient to meet anticipated cash requirements for our current operations.  However, we have a stated policy to grow through acquisition and are continuously evaluating various acquisition opportunities.  As a result, we currently are pursuing the potential purchase of a number of candidates.  In the event that more than one of these transactions are successfully consummated, the availability under the Credit Facility might be fully utilized and additional funding sources may be needed.  There can be no assurance that such funding sources will be available to us on terms favorable to us, if at all.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s critical accounting policies are discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and notes accompanying the consolidated financial statements that appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006. Except as otherwise disclosed in the financial statements and accompanying notes included in this report, there were no material changes subsequent to the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006 in the Company’s critical accounting policies or in the assumptions or estimates used to prepare the financial information appearing in this report.

Forward Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 relating to our future operations and prospects, including statements that are based on current projections and expectations about the markets in which we operate, and our beliefs concerning future performance and capital requirements based upon current available information.  Such statements are based on our beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to us.  When used in this document, words like “may”, “might”, “will”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “potential”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements.  Actual results could differ materially from our current expectations.  For example, there can be no assurance that additional capital will not be required or that additional capital, if required, will be available on reasonable terms, if at all, at such times and in such amounts as may be needed by us.  In addition to these factors, among other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are uncertainties relating to the integration of acquired businesses, general economic conditions affecting our business, dependence of certain of our businesses on certain key customers as well as competitive factors relating to the aviation industry. For a more detailed discussion of these and other factors affecting us, see the risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006, filed with the SEC in June 2006.

Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

For information regarding our exposure to certain market risks, see Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006.  There has been no material change in this information.

21

TRIUMPH GROUP, INC.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As of June 30, 2006, we completed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.  Based on the foregoing, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of June 30, 2006.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

There were no changes that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Part II.  Other Information

Item 6.   Exhibits.

Exhibit 31.1                   Section 302 Certification by President and CEO

Exhibit 31.2                   Section 302 Certification by Senior Vice President and CFO

Exhibit 32.1                   Certification of Periodic Report by President and CEO

Exhibit 32.2                   Certification of Periodic Report by Senior Vice President and CFO

22

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

23