Valmont Industries - 10-K annual report 2013

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 2
PART IV

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Commission file number 1-31429

Valmont Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(402) 963-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

          Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

          Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý    No o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o    No ý

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý    No o

          Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ý

          At February 19, 2014 there were 26,829,691 of the Company's common shares outstanding. The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Company based on the closing sale price the common shares as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on June 29, 2013 was $3,830,994,339.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

          Portions of the Company's proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders to be held on April 29, 2014 (the "Proxy Statement"), to be filed within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013, are incorporated by reference in Part III.

Table of Contents

VALMONT INDUSTRIES, INC.
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS.

(a)   General Description of Business

General

        We are a diversified global producer of fabricated metal products and are a leading producer of steel and aluminum pole, tower and other structures in our Engineered Infrastructure Products (EIP) segment, steel and concrete pole structures in our Utilities Support Structures (Utility) segment and are a global producer of mechanized irrigation systems in our Irrigation segment. We also provide metal coating services, including galvanizing, painting and anodizing in our Coatings segment. Our products sold through the EIP segment include outdoor lighting and traffic control structures, wireless communication structures and components and roadway safety and industrial access systems. Our pole structures sold through our Utility segment support electrical transmission and distribution lines and related power distribution equipment. Our Irrigation segment produces mechanized irrigation equipment that delivers water, chemical fertilizers and pesticides to agricultural crops. Customers and end-users of our products include state and federal governments, contractors, utility and telecommunications companies, manufacturers of commercial lighting fixtures and large farms as well as the general manufacturing sector. In 2013, approximately 37% of our total sales were either sold in markets or produced by our manufacturing plants outside of North America. We were founded in 1946, went public in 1968 and our shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange (ticker: VMI).

Business Strategy

        Our strategy is to pursue growth opportunities that leverage our existing product portfolio, knowledge of our principal end-markets and customers and engineering capability to increase our sales, earnings and cash flow, including:

        Increasing the Market Penetration of our Existing Products.    Our strategy is to increase our market penetration by differentiating our products from our competitors' products through superior customer service, technological innovation and consistent high quality. For example, in recent years, our Utility segment increased its sales through our engineering capability, effective coordination of our production capacity and strong customer service to meet our customers' requirements, especially on large, complex projects. Our acquisition of Delta plc in May 2010 was in part intended to improve our market presence and penetration in the Australian lighting, communication and utility structures markets and the U.S. industrial galvanizing markets.

        Bringing our Existing Products to New Markets.    Our strategy is to expand the sales of our existing products into geographic areas where we do not currently have a strong presence as well as into applications for which end-users do not currently purchase our type of product. In recent years, our Utility business successfully expanded into new markets in Africa. We have also expanded our geographic presence in Europe and North Africa for lighting structures. We have also been successful introducing our pole products to utility and wireless communication applications where customers have traditionally purchased lattice tower products. Our strategy of building a manufacturing presence in China was based primarily on expanding our offering of pole structures for lighting, utility and wireless communication to the Chinese market. During 2011 we established manufacturing operations in India to provide pole structures for lighting, utility and wireless communications to the Indian market as well as galvanizing services. Our Irrigation segment has a long history of developing new mechanized irrigation markets in emerging markets. In recent years, these markets include China and Eastern Europe. Our 2012 acquisition of Pure Metal Galvanizing provides us with a presence in the Canadian galvanizing market.

3

Table of Contents

        Developing New Products for Markets that We Currently Serve.    Our strategy is to grow by developing new products for markets where we have a comprehensive understanding of end-user requirements and longstanding relationships with key distributors and end-users. For example, in recent years we developed and sold structures for tramway applications in Europe. The customers for this product line include many of the state and local governments that purchase our lighting structures. Another example is the development and expansion of decorative product concepts for lighting applications that have been introduced to our existing customer base.

        Developing New Products for New Markets and Leverage a Core Competency to Further Diversify our Business.    Our strategy is to increase our sales and diversify our business by developing new products for new markets or to leverage a core competency. For example, we have been expanding our offering of specialized decorative lighting poles in the U.S. The decorative lighting market has different customers than our traditional markets and the products to serve that market are different than the poles we manufacture for the transportation and commercial markets. The acquisition of Delta gave us a presence in highway safety systems and industrial access systems, products that we believe are complementary to our existing products and provide us with future growth opportunities. The establishment and growth of our Coatings segment was based on using our expertise in galvanizing to develop what is now a global business segment.

Acquisitions

        We have grown internally and by acquisition. Our significant business expansions during the past five years include the following (including the segment where the business reports):

        2010

•

Acquisition of Delta plc, a publiclytraded company headquartered in the United Kingdom that manufactures and distributes steel engineered products, provides galvanizing services and manufactures steel forged grinding media and electrolytic manganese dioxide (EIP, Coatings, Other)

        2011

•

Acquisition of the remaining 40% not previously owned of Donhad Pty. Ltd., a forged steel grinding media manufacturer located in Australia (Other)



•

Acquisition of an irrigation monitoring services company located in Brazil (Irrigation)

        2012

•

Acquisition of a galvanizing business with three locations in Ontario, Canada (Coatings)

        2013

•

Acquisition of a manufacturer of perforated, expanded metal for the non-residential market, industrial flooring and handrails for the access systems market, and screening media for applications in the industrial and mining sectors in Australia and Asia (EIP)



•

Acquisition of the remaining 40% not previously owned of Valley Irrigation South Africa Pty. Ltd (Irrigation)



•

Acquisition of a company holding proprietary intellectual property for products serving the highway safety market located in New Zealand (EIP)

        There have been no significant divestitures of businesses in the past five years. In 2011, we exited our structures joint venture in Turkey (formed in 2008) and ceased our structures sales and distribution operation in Italy. Both of these businesses were in the EIP segment. The impact of these events on our financial statements was not material.

4

Table of Contents

(b)   Segments

        We have four reportable segments based on our management structure. Each segment is global in nature with a manager responsible for segment operational performance and allocation of capital within the segment.

        Our reportable segments are as follows:

        Engineered Infrastructure Products:    This segment consists of the manufacture of engineered metal structures and components for global lighting and traffic, wireless communication, roadway safety and access systems applications;

        Utility Support Structures:    This segment consists of the manufacture of engineered steel and concrete structures for the global utility industry;

        Coatings:    This segment consists of galvanizing, anodizing and powder coating services on a global basis; and

        Irrigation:    This segment consists of the manufacture of agricultural irrigation equipment and related parts and services for the global agricultural industry.

        Other:    In addition to these four reportable segments, we have other operations and activities that individually are not more than 10% of consolidated sales, operating income or assets. These activities include the manufacture of forged steel grinding media for the mining industry, tubular products for a variety of industrial customers, electrolytic manganese dioxide for disposable batteries and the distribution of industrial fasteners.

        Amounts of sales, operating income and total assets attributable to each segment for each of the last three years is set forth in Note 17 of our consolidated financial statements.

(c)   Narrative Description of Business

        Information concerning the principal products produced and services rendered, markets, competition and distribution methods for each of our four reportable segments is set forth below.

Engineered Infrastructure Products Segment

        Products Produced—We manufacture steel and aluminum poles and structures to which lighting and traffic control fixtures are attached for a wide range of outdoor lighting applications, such as streets, highways, parking lots, sports stadiums and commercial and residential developments. The demand for these products is driven by infrastructure, commercial and residential construction and by consumers' desire for well-lit streets, highways, parking lots and common areas to help make these areas safer at night and to support trends toward more active lifestyles and 24-hour convenience. In addition to safety, customers want products that are visually appealing. In Europe, we are a leader in decorative lighting poles, which are attractive as well as functional. We are leveraging this expertise to expand our decorative product sales in North America and China. Traffic poles are structures to which traffic signals are attached and aid the orderly flow of automobile traffic. While standard designs are available, poles are often engineered to customer specifications to ensure the proper function and safety of the structure. Product engineering takes into account factors such as weather (e.g. wind, ice) and the products loaded on the structure (e.g. lighting fixtures, traffic signals, overhead signs) to determine the design of the pole. This product line also includes roadway safety systems, including guard rail barrier systems, wire rope safety barriers, crash attenuation barriers and other products designed to redirect vehicles when off course and to prevent collisions between vehicles. Highway safety systems are also designed and engineered to absorb collisions and ultimately reduce roadway fatalities and injury.

5

Table of Contents

        We also manufacture and distribute a broad range of structures (poles and towers) and components serving the wireless communication market. A wireless communication cell site mainly consists of a steel pole or tower, shelter (enclosure where the radio equipment is located), antennas (devices that receive and transmit data and voice information to and from wireless communication devices) and components (items that are used to mount antennas to the structure and to connect cabling and other parts from the antennas to the shelter). Structures are engineered and designed to customer specifications, which include factors such as the number of antennas on the structure and wind and soil conditions. Due to the size of these structures, design is important to ensure each structure meets performance and safety specifications. We do not provide any significant installation services on the structures we sell.

        The EIP segment also produces and distributes access systems. Access systems are engineered structures and components that allow people to move safely and effectively in an industrial, infrastructure or commercial facility. Access systems also are used in architectural applications. Products offered in this product line are usually engineered to specific customer requirements and include floor gratings, handrails, barriers and sunscreens.

        Markets—The key markets for our lighting, traffic and roadway safety products are the transportation and commercial lighting markets and public roadway building and improvement. The transportation market includes street and highway lighting and traffic control, much of which is driven by government spending programs. For example, the U.S. government funds highway and road improvement through the federal highway program. This program provides funding to improve the nation's roadway system, which includes roadway lighting and traffic control enhancements. Matching funding from the various states may be required as a condition of federal funding. The current federal highway program is now operating under a two-year extension that will expire in 2014. In North America, governments desire to improve road and highway systems by reducing traffic congestion. In the United States, there are approximately 4 million miles of public roadways, with approximately 24% carrying over 80% of the traffic. Accordingly, the need to improve traffic flow through traffic controls and lighting is a priority for many communities. Transportation markets in other areas of the world are also heavily funded by local and national governments. The commercial lighting market is mainly funded privately and includes lighting for applications such as parking lots, shopping centers, sports stadiums and business parks. The commercial lighting market is driven by macro-economic factors such as general economic growth rates, interest rates and the commercial construction economy.

        The main markets for our communication products have been the wireless telephone carriers and build-to-suit companies (organizations that own cell sites and attach antennas from multiple carriers to the pole or tower structure). We also sell products to state and federal governments for two-way radio communication, radar, broadcasting and security applications. We believe long-term growth should mainly be driven by increased usage, technologies such as 4G (including applications for smart phones, such as streaming video and internet) and demand for improved emergency response systems, as part of the U.S. Homeland Security initiatives. Subscriber growth should continue to increase, although at a lower rate than in the past. In general, as the number of subscribers and usage of wireless communication devices increase, we believe this will result in demand for communication structures and components.

        Markets for access systems are typically driven by infrastructure, industrial and commercial construction spending and can be cyclical depending on economic conditions in the markets in which we compete. Customers consist of construction firms or installers who participate in infrastructure, industrial and commercial construction projects, resellers such as steel service centers and end users.

        All of the products that we manufacture in this segment are parts of customer investments in basic infrastructure. The total cost of these investments can be substantial, so access to capital is often

6

Table of Contents

important to fund infrastructure needs. Due to the nature of these markets, demand can be cyclical as projects sometimes can be delayed due to funding or other issues.

        Competition—Our competitive strategy in all of the markets we serve is to provide high value to the customer at a reasonable price. We compete on the basis of product quality, high levels of customer service, timely, complete and accurate delivery of the product and design capability to provide the best solutions to our customers. There are numerous competitors in our markets, most of which are relatively small companies. Companies compete on the basis of price, product quality, reliable delivery and unique product features. Pricing can be very competitive, especially when demand is weak or when strong local currencies result in increased competition from imported products.

        Distribution Methods—Sales and distribution activities are handled through a combination of a direct sales force and commissioned agents. Lighting agents represent Valmont as well as lighting fixture companies and sell other related products. Sales are typically to electrical distributors, who provide the pole, fixtures and other equipment to the end user as a complete package. Commercial lighting and highway safety sales are normally made through Valmont sales employees, who work on a salary plus incentive, although some sales are made through independent, commissioned sales agents.

Utility Support Structures Segment

        Products Produced—We manufacture steel and concrete pole structures for electrical transmission, substation and distribution applications. Our products help move electrical power from where it is produced to where it is used. We produce tapered steel and pre-stressed concrete poles for high-voltage transmission lines, substations (which transfer high-voltage electricity to low-voltage transmission) and electrical distribution (which carry electricity from the substation to the end-user). In addition, we produce hybrid structures, which are structures with a concrete base section and steel upper sections. Utility structures can be very large, so product design engineering is important to the function and safety of the structure. Our engineering process takes into account weather and loading conditions, such as wind speeds, ice loads and the power lines attached to the structure, in order to arrive at the final design.

        Markets—Our sales in this segment are mainly in North America, where the key drivers in the utility business are significant upgrades in the electrical grid to support enhanced reliability standards, policy changes encouraging more generation from renewable energy sources, interconnection of regional grids to share more efficient generation to the benefit of the consumer and increased electrical consumption which has outpaced the transmission investment in the past decades. According to the Edison Electric Institute, the electrical transmission grid in the U.S. requires significant investment in the coming years to respond to the compelling industry drivers and lack of investment over the past 25 years. The expected increase in electrical consumption around the world should also require substantial investment in new electricity generation capacity which will prompt further international growth in transmission grid development. We expect these factors to result in increased demand for electrical utility structures to transport electricity from source to user.

        Competition—Our competitive strategy in this segment is to provide high value solutions to the customer at a reasonable price. We compete on the basis of product quality, engineering expertise, high levels of customer service and reliable, timely delivery of the product. There are many competitors. Companies compete on the basis of price, quality and service. Utility sales are often made through a competitive bid process, whereby the lowest bidder is awarded the contract, provided the competitor meets all other qualifying criteria. In weak markets, price is a more important criterion in the bid process.

        Distribution Methods—Products are normally sold through commissioned sales agents or sold directly to electrical utilities.

7

Table of Contents

Coatings Segment

        Services Rendered—We add finishes to metals that inhibit corrosion, extend service lives and enhance physical attractiveness of a wide range of materials and products. Among the services provided include:

•

Hot-dipped Galvanizing



•

Anodizing



•

Powder Coating



•

E-Coating

        In our Coatings segment, we take unfinished products from our customers and return them with a galvanized, anodized or painted finish. Galvanizing is a process that protects steel with a zinc coating that is bonded to the product surface to inhibit rust and corrosion. Anodizing is a process applied to aluminum that oxidizes the surface of the aluminum in a controlled manner, which protects the aluminum from corrosion and allows the material to be dyed a variety of colors. We also paint products using powder coating and e-coating technology (where paint is applied through an electrical charge) for a number of industries and markets.

        Markets—Markets for our products are varied and our profitability is not substantially dependent on any one industry or customer. Demand for coatings services generally follows the local industrial economies. Galvanizing is used in a wide variety of industrial applications where corrosion protection of steel is desired. While markets are varied, our markets for anodized or painted products are more directly dependent on consumer markets than industrial markets.

        Competition—The Coatings markets traditionally have been very fragmented, with a large number of competitors. Most of these competitors are relatively small, privately held companies who compete on the basis of price and personal relationships with their customers. As a result of ongoing industry consolidation, there are also several (public and private) multi-facility competitors. Our strategy is to compete on the basis of quality of the coating finish and timely delivery of the coated product to the customer. We also use the production capacity at our network of plants to ensure that the customer receives quality, timely service.

        Distribution Methods—Due to freight costs, a galvanizing location has an effective service area of an approximate 300 to 500 mile radius. While we believe that we are globally one of the largest custom galvanizers, our sales are a small percentage of the total market. Sales and customer service are provided directly to the user by a direct sales force, generally assigned to each specific location.

Irrigation Segment

        Products Produced—We manufacture and distribute mechanical irrigation equipment and related service parts under the "Valley" brand name. A Valley irrigation machine usually is powered by electricity and propels itself over a farm field and applies water and chemicals to crops. Water and, in some instances, chemicals are applied through sprinklers attached to a pipeline that is supported by a series of towers, each of which is propelled via a drive train and tires. A standard mechanized irrigation machine (also known as a "center pivot") rotates in a circle, although we also manufacture and distribute center pivot extensions that can irrigate corners of square and rectangular farm fields as well as conform to irregular field boundaries (referred to as a "corner" machine). Our irrigation machines can also irrigate fields by moving up and down the field as opposed to rotating in a circle (referred to as a "linear" machine). Irrigation machines can be configured to irrigate fields in size from 4 acres to over 500 acres, with a standard size in the U.S. configured for a 160-acre tract of ground. One of the key components of our irrigation machine is the control system. This is the part of the machine that

8

Table of Contents

allows the machine to be operated in the manner preferred by the grower, offering control of such factors as on/off timing, individual field sector control, rate and depth of water and chemical application. We also offer growers options to control multiple irrigation machines through centralized computer control or mobile remote control. The irrigation machine used in international markets is substantially the same as the one produced for the North American market.

        There are other forms of irrigation available to farmers, two of the most prevalent being flood irrigation and drip irrigation. In flood irrigation, water is applied through a pipe or canal at the top of the field and allowed to run down the field by gravity. Drip irrigation involves plastic pipe or tape resting on the surface of the field or buried a few inches below ground level, with water being applied gradually. We estimate that center pivot and linear irrigation comprises 45% of the irrigated acreage in North America. International markets use predominantly flood irrigation, although all forms are used to some extent.

        Markets—Market drivers in North American and international markets are essentially the same. Since the purchase of an irrigation machine is a capital expenditure, the purchase decision is based on the expected return on investment. The benefits a grower may realize through investment in mechanical irrigation include improved yields through better irrigation, cost savings through reduced labor and lower water and energy usage. The purchase decision is also affected by current and expected net farm income, commodity prices, interest rates, the status of government support programs and water regulations in local areas. In many international markets, the relative strength or weakness of local currencies as compared with the U.S. dollar may affect net farm income, since export markets are generally denominated in U.S. dollars.

        The demand for mechanized irrigation comes from the following sources:

•

conversion from flood irrigation



•

replacement of existing mechanized irrigation machines



•

converting land that is not irrigated to mechanized irrigation

        One of the key drivers in our Irrigation segment worldwide is that the usable water supply is limited. We estimate that:

•

only 2.5% of total worldwide water supply is freshwater



•

of that 2.5%, only 30% of freshwater is available to humans



•

the largest user of that freshwater is agriculture

        We believe these factors, along with the trend of a growing worldwide population and improving diets, reflect the need to use water more efficiently while increasing food production to feed this growing population. We believe that mechanized irrigation can improve water application efficiency by 40-90% compared with traditional irrigation methods by applying water uniformly near the root zone and reducing water runoff. Furthermore, reduced water runoff improves water quality in nearby rivers, aquifers and streams, thereby providing environmental benefits in addition to conservation of water.

        Competition—In North America, there are a number of entities that provide irrigation products and services to agricultural customers. We believe we are the leader of the four main participants in the mechanized irrigation business. Participants compete for sales on the basis of price, product innovation and features, product durability and reliability, quality and service capabilities of the local dealer. Pricing can become very competitive, especially in periods when market demand is low. In international markets, our competitors are a combination of our major U.S. competitors and privately-owned local companies. Competitive factors are similar to those in North America, although pricing tends to be a more prevalent competitive strategy in international markets. Since competition in international markets is local, we believe local manufacturing capability is important to competing effectively in international markets and we have that capability in key regions.

9

Table of Contents

        Distribution Methods—We market our irrigation machines and service parts through independent dealers. There are approximately 270 dealer locations in North America, with another approximately 220 dealers serving international markets. The dealer determines the grower's requirements, designs the configuration of the machine, installs the machine (including providing ancillary products that deliver water and electrical power to the machine) and provides after-sales service. Our dealer network is supported and trained by our technical and sales teams. Our international dealers are supported through our regional headquarters in South America, South Africa, Western Europe, Australia, China and the United Arab Emirates as well as the home office in Valley, Nebraska.

General

        Certain information generally applicable to each of our four reportable segments is set forth below.

Suppliers and Availability of Raw Materials.

        Hot rolled steel coil and plate, zinc and other carbon steel products are the primary raw materials utilized in the manufacture of finished products for all segments. We purchase these essential items from steel mills, zinc producers and steel service centers and are usually readily available. While we may experience increased lead times to acquire materials and volatility in our purchase costs, we do not believe that key raw materials would be unavailable for extended periods. We have not experienced extended or wide-spread shortages of steel during this time, due to what we believe are strong relationships with some of the major steel producers. In the past several years, we experienced volatility in zinc and natural gas prices, but we did not experience any disruptions to our operations due to availability.

Patents, Licenses, Franchises and Concessions.

        We have a number of patents for our manufacturing machinery, poles and irrigation designs. We also have a number of registered trademarks. We do not believe the loss of any individual patent or trademark would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Seasonal Factors in Business.

        Sales can be somewhat seasonal based upon the agricultural growing season and the infrastructure construction season. Sales of mechanized irrigation equipment to farmers are traditionally higher during the spring and fall and lower in the summer. Sales of infrastructure products are traditionally higher summer and fall and lower in the winter.

Customers.

        We are not dependent for a material part of any segment's business upon a single customer or upon very few customers. The loss of any one customer would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Backlog.

        The backlog of orders for the principal products manufactured and marketed was $666.6 million at the end of the 2013 fiscal year and $902.5 million at the end of the 2012 fiscal year. We anticipate that

10

Table of Contents

most of the 2013 backlog of orders will be filled during fiscal year 2014. At year-end, the segments with backlog were as follows (dollar amounts in millions):

Research Activities.

        The information called for by this item is included in Note 1 of our consolidated financial statements.

Environmental Disclosure.

        We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to environmental protection and the discharge of materials into the environment. Although we continually incur expenses and make capital expenditures related to environmental protection, we do not anticipate that future expenditures should materially impact our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

Number of Employees.

        At December 28, 2013, we had 10,769 employees.

(d)   Financial Information About Geographic Areas

        Our international sales activities encompass over 100 foreign countries. The information called for by this item is included in Note 17 of our consolidated financial statements. While Australia accounted for approximately 15% of our net sales in 2013, no other foreign country accounted for more than 4% of our net sales. Net sales for purposes of Note 17 include sales to outside customers.

(e)   Available Information

        We make available, free of charge through our Internet web site at http://www.valmont.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS.

        The following risk factors describe various risks that may affect our business, financial condition and operations.

Increases in prices and reduced availability of key commodities such as steel, aluminum, zinc, natural gas and fuel will increase our operating costs and likely reduce our profitability.

        Hot rolled steel coil and other carbon steel products have historically constituted approximately one-third of the cost of manufacturing our products. We also use large quantities of aluminum for lighting structures and zinc for the galvanization of most of our steel products. Our facilities use large

11

Table of Contents

quantities of natural gas for heating and processing tanks in our galvanizing operations. We use gasoline and diesel fuel to transport raw materials to our locations and to deliver finished goods to our customers. The markets for these commodities can be volatile. The following factors increase the cost and reduce the availability of these commodities:

•

increased demand, which occurs when we and other industries require greater quantities of these commodities, which can result in higher prices and lengthen the time it takes to receive these commodities from suppliers;



•

lower production levels of these commodities, due to reduced production capacities or shortages of materials needed to produce these commodities (such as coke and scrap steel for the production of steel) which could result in reduced supplies of these commodities, higher costs for us and increased lead times;



•

increased cost of major inputs, such as scrap steel, coke, iron ore and energy;



•

fluctuations in foreign exchange rates can impact the relative cost of these commodities, which may affect the cost effectiveness of imported materials and limit our options in acquiring these commodities; and



•

international trade disputes, import duties and quotas, since we import some steel for our domestic and foreign manufacturing facilities.

        Increases in the selling prices of our products may not fully recover higher commodity costs and generally lag increases in our costs of these commodities. Consequently, an increase in these commodities will increase our operating costs and likely reduce our profitability.

        Rising steel prices in 2010 and 2011 put pressure on gross profit margins, especially in our Engineered Infrastructure Products and Utility Support Structures segments. In both of these segments, the elapsed time between the quotation of a sales order and the manufacturing of the product ordered can be several months. As some of these sales are fixed price contracts, rapid increases in steel costs likely will result in lower operating income in these businesses. We believe the volatility over the past several years was due to significant increases in global steel production and consumption (especially in rapidly growing economies, such as China and India). The strong global demand for steel led to rapidly rising costs in key steel-making materials (such as coke, iron ore and scrap steel), thereby raising prices to companies that manufacture products from steel. Under such circumstances, steel supplies may become tighter and impact our ability to acquire steel and meet customer requirements on a timely basis. The speed with which steel suppliers impose price increases on us may prevent us from fully recovering these price increases and result in reduced operating margins, particularly in our lighting and traffic and utility businesses.

The ultimate consumers of our products operate in cyclical industries that have been subject to significant downturns which have adversely impacted our sales in the past and may again in the future.

        Our sales are sensitive to the market conditions present in the industries in which the ultimate consumers of our products operate, which in some cases have been highly cyclical and subject to substantial downturns. For example, a significant portion of our sales of support structures is to the electric utility industry. Our sales to the U.S. electric utility industry were over $900 million in 2013. Purchases of our products are deferrable to the extent that utilities may reduce capital expenditures for reasons such as unfavorable regulatory environments, a slow U.S. economy or financing constraints. In the event of weakness in the demand for utility structures due to reduced or delayed spending for electrical generation and transmission projects, our sales and operating income likely will decrease.

        The end users of our mechanized irrigation equipment are farmers. Accordingly, economic changes within the agriculture industry, particularly the level of farm income, may affect sales of these products.

12

Table of Contents

From time to time, lower levels of farm income resulted in reduced demand for our mechanized irrigation and tubing products. Farm income decreases when commodity prices, acreage planted, crop yields, government subsidies and export levels decrease. In addition, weather conditions, such as extreme drought may result in reduced availability of water for irrigation, and can affect farmers' buying decisions. Farm income can also decrease as farmers' operating costs increase. Increases in oil and natural gas prices result in higher costs of energy and nitrogen-based fertilizer (which uses natural gas as a major ingredient). Furthermore, uncertainty as to future government agricultural policies may cause indecision on the part of farmers. The status and trend of government farm supports, financing aids and policies regarding the ability to use water for agricultural irrigation can affect the demand for our irrigation equipment. In the United States, certain parts of the country are considering policies that would restrict usage of water for irrigation. All of these factors may cause farmers to delay capital expenditures for farm equipment. Consequently, downturns in the agricultural industry will likely result in a slower, and possibly a negative, rate of growth in irrigation equipment and tubing sales.

        We have also experienced cyclical demand for those of our products that we sell to the wireless communications industry. Sales of wireless structures and components to wireless carriers and build-to-suit companies that serve the wireless communications industry have historically been cyclical. These customers may elect to curtail spending on new capacity to focus on cash flow and capital management. Weak market conditions have led to competitive pricing in recent years, putting pressure on our profit margins on sales to this industry. Changes in the competitive structure of the wireless industry, due to industry consolidation or reorganization, may interrupt capital plans of the wireless carriers as they assess their networks.

        Due to the cyclical nature of these markets, we have experienced, and in the future we may experience, significant fluctuations in our sales and operating income with respect to a substantial portion of our total product offering, and such fluctuations could be material and adverse to our overall financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

Demand for our infrastructure products and coating services is highly dependent upon the overall level of infrastructure spending.

        We manufacture and distribute engineered infrastructure products for lighting and traffic, utility and other specialty applications. Our Coatings segments serve many construction-related industries. Because these products are used primarily in infrastructure construction, sales in these businesses are highly correlated with the level of construction activity, which historically has been cyclical. Construction activity by our private and government customers is affected by and can decline because of, a number of factors, including (but not limited to):

•

weakness in the general economy, which may negatively affect tax revenues, resulting in reduced funds available for construction;



•

interest rate increases, which increase the cost of construction financing; and



•

adverse weather conditions which slow construction activity.

        The current economic uncertainty and slowness in the United States and Europe will have some negative effect on our business. In our North American lighting product line, some of our lighting structure sales are for new residential and commercial areas. As residential and commercial construction remains weak, we have experienced some negative impact on our light pole sales to these markets. In a broader sense, in the event of an overall downturn in the economies in Europe, Australia or China, we may experience decreased demand if our customers have difficulty securing credit for their purchases from us.

        In addition, sales in our Engineered Infrastructure Products segment, particularly our lighting, traffic and highway safety products, are highly dependent upon federal, state, local and foreign

13

Table of Contents

government spending on infrastructure development projects, such as the U.S. federal highway program. The level of spending on such projects may decline for a number of reasons beyond our control, including, among other things, budgetary constraints affecting government spending generally or transportation agencies in particular, decreases in tax revenues and changes in the political climate, including legislative delays, with respect to infrastructure appropriations. For instance, the lack of long-term U.S. federal highway spending legislation has had a negative impact on our sales in this market. A substantial reduction in the level of government appropriations for infrastructure projects could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or liquidity.

We may lose some of our foreign investment or our foreign sales and profits may reduce because of risks of doing business in foreign markets.

        We are an international manufacturing company with operations around the world. At December 28, 2013, we operated over 100 manufacturing plants, located on six continents, and sold our products in more than 100 countries. In 2013, approximately 37% of our total sales were either sold in markets or produced by our manufacturing plants outside of North America. We have operations in geographic markets that have recently experienced political instability, such as the Middle East, and economic uncertainty, such as Western Europe. Our geographic diversity also requires that we hire, train and retain competent management for the various local markets. We also have a significant manufacturing presence in Australia, Europe and China. We expect that international sales will continue to account for a significant percentage of our net sales in the future. Accordingly, our foreign business operations and our foreign sales and profits are subject to the following potential risks:

•

political and economic instability where we have foreign business operations, resulting in the reduction of the value of, or the loss of, our investment;



•

recessions in economies of countries in which we have business operations, decreasing our international sales;



•

difficulties and costs of staffing and managing our foreign operations, increasing our foreign operating costs and decreasing profits;



•

potential violation of local laws or unsanctioned management actions that could affect our profitability or ability to compete in certain markets;



•

difficulties in enforcing our rights outside the United States for patents on our manufacturing machinery, poles and irrigation designs;



•

increases in tariffs, export controls, taxes and other trade barriers reducing our international sales and our profit on these sales; and



•

acts of war or terrorism.

        As a result, we may lose some of our foreign investment or our foreign sales and profits may be materially reduced because of risks of doing business in foreign markets.

We are subject to currency fluctuations from our international sales, which can negatively impact our reported earnings.

        We sell our products in many countries around the world. Approximately 37% of our fiscal 2013 sales were in markets outside the United States and are often made in foreign currencies, mainly the Australian dollar, euro, Brazilian real, Canadian dollar, Chinese renminbi and South African rand. Because our financial statements are denominated in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies have had and will continue to have an impact on our reported earnings. For example, the U.S. dollar appreciated versus the Australian dollar in 2013. As a result, our Australian sales measured in U.S. dollar terms decreased by approximately $30 million

14

Table of Contents

due to exchange rate translation effects. If the U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens versus the foreign currencies mentioned above, the result will be an increase or decrease in our reported sales and earnings, respectively. Currency fluctuations have affected our financial performance in the past and may affect our financial performance in any given period. In cases where local currencies are strong, the relative cost of goods imported from outside our country of operation becomes lower and affects our ability to compete profitably in our home markets. We experienced increased pricing competition in our access systems product line in Australia in 2011 and 2012. This increased pricing pressure, in part, was due to the strong Australian dollar and resulting competition from companies outside of Australia.

        We also face risks arising from the imposition of foreign exchange controls and currency devaluations. Exchange controls may limit our ability to convert foreign currencies into U.S. dollars or to remit dividends and other payments by our foreign subsidiaries or businesses located in or conducted within a country imposing controls. Currency devaluations result in a diminished value of funds denominated in the currency of the country instituting the devaluation. Actions of this nature could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition in any given period.

Our businesses require skilled labor and management talent and we may be unable to attract and retain qualified employees.

        Our businesses require skilled factory workers and management in order to meet our customer's needs, grow our sales and maintain competitive advantages. Skills such as welding, equipment maintenance and operating complex manufacturing machinery may be in short supply in certain geographic areas, leading to shortages of skilled labor and/or increased labor costs. Management talent is critical as well, to help grow our businesses and effectively plan for succession of key employees upon retirement. In some geographic areas, skilled management talent in certain areas may be difficult to find. To the extent we have difficulty in finding and retaining these skills in the workforce, there may be an adverse effect on our ability to grow profitably in the future.

We may incur significant warranty or contract management costs.

        In our Utility Support Structures segment, we manufacture large structures for electrical transmission. These products may be highly engineered for very large, complex contracts and subject to terms and conditions that penalize us for late delivery and result in consequential and compensatory damages. From time to time, we may have a product quality issue on a large utility structures order and the costs of curing that issue may be significant. Our products in the Engineered Infrastructure Products segment include structures for a wide range of outdoor lighting and wireless communication applications. In our Irrigation segment, our products are covered under warranties, some for several years. We may incur significant warranty or product related costs, which may include repairing or replacing defective or non-conforming products, even if another party may have contributed to the problem. In such cases, the costs of correcting the quality issue may be significant.

We face strong competition in our markets.

        We face competitive pressures from a variety of companies in each of the markets we serve. Our competitors include companies who provide the technologies that we provide as well as companies who provide competing technologies, such as drip irrigation. Our competitors include international, national, and local manufacturers, some of whom may have greater financial, manufacturing, marketing and technical resources than we do, or greater penetration in or familiarity with a particular geographic market than we have. In addition, certain of our competitors, particularly with respect to our utility and wireless communication product lines, have sought bankruptcy protection in recent years, and may emerge with reduced debt service obligations, which could allow them to operate at pricing levels that put pressures on our margins. Some of our customers have moved manufacturing operations or product sourcing overseas, which can negatively impact our sales of galvanizing and anodizing services. To remain competitive, we will need to invest continuously in manufacturing, product development and customer service, and we may need to reduce our prices, particularly with respect to customers in industries that are experiencing downturns. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to maintain our competitive position in each of the markets that we serve.

15

Table of Contents

We could incur substantial costs as the result of violations of, or liabilities under, environmental laws.

        Our facilities and operations are subject to U.S. and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, and the cleanup of contamination. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations, or with the permits required for our operations, could result in fines or civil or criminal sanctions, third party claims for property damage or personal injury, and investigation and cleanup costs. Potentially significant expenditures could be required in order to comply with environmental laws that regulators may adopt or impose in the future.

        Certain of our facilities have been in operation for many years and, over time, we and other predecessor operators of these facilities have generated, used, handled and disposed of hazardous and other regulated wastes. We detected contaminants at some of our present and former sites, principally in connection with historical operations. In addition, from time to time we have been named as a potentially responsible party under Superfund or similar state laws. While we are not aware of any contaminated sites that are not provided for in our financial statements, including third-party sites, at which we may have material obligations, the discovery of additional contaminants or the imposition of additional cleanup obligations at these sites could result in significant liability beyond amounts provided for in our financial statements.

We may not realize the improved operating results that we anticipate from acquisitions we may make in the future, and we may experience difficulties in integrating the acquired businesses or may inherit significant liabilities related to such businesses.

        We explore opportunities to acquire businesses that we believe are related to our core competencies from time to time, some of which may be material to us. We expect such acquisitions will produce operating results better than those historically experienced or presently expected to be experienced in the future by us in the absence of the acquisition. We cannot provide assurance that this assumption will prove correct with respect to any acquisition.

        Any future acquisitions may present significant challenges for our management due to the time and resources required to properly integrate management, employees, information systems, accounting controls, personnel and administrative functions of the acquired business with those of Valmont and to manage the combined company on a going forward basis. We may not be able to completely integrate and streamline overlapping functions or, if such activities are successfully accomplished, such integration may be more costly to accomplish than presently contemplated. We may also have difficulty in successfully integrating the product offerings of Valmont and acquired businesses to improve our collective product offering. Our efforts to integrate acquired businesses could be affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including general economic conditions. In addition, the process of integrating acquired businesses could cause the interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of our existing business. The diversion of management's attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the integration acquired businesses could adversely impact our business, results of operations and liquidity, and the benefits we anticipate may never materialize. These factors are relevant to any acquisition we undertake.

        In addition, although we conduct reviews of businesses we acquire, we may be subject to unexpected claims or liabilities, including environmental cleanup costs, as a result of these acquisitions. Such claims or liabilities could be costly to defend or resolve and be material in amount, and thus could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations and liquidity.

16

Table of Contents

We have, from time to time, maintained a substantial amount of outstanding indebtedness, which could impair our ability to operate our business and react to changes in our business, remain in compliance with debt covenants and make payments on our debt.

        As of December 28, 2013, we had $490.1 million of total indebtedness outstanding. We had $382.1 million capacity to borrow under our revolving credit facility at December 28, 2013. We normally borrow money to make business acquisitions and major capital expenditures. From time to time, our borrowings have been significant. Our level of indebtedness could have important consequences, including:

•

our ability to satisfy our obligations under our debt agreements could be affected and any failure to comply with the requirements, including significant financial and other restrictive covenants, of any of our debt agreements could result in an event of default under the agreements governing our indebtedness;



•

a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations will be required to make interest and principal payments and will not be available for operations, working capital, capital expenditures, expansion, or general corporate and other purposes, including possible future acquisitions that we believe would be beneficial to our business;



•

our ability to obtain additional financing in the future may be impaired;



•

we may be more highly leveraged than our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;



•

our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry may be limited; and



•

our degree of leverage may make us more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our business, our industry or the economy in general.

        We had $613.7 million of cash at December 28, 2013, which mitigates the risk associated with our debt. However, as we use cash for acquisitions and other purposes, any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and business prospects.

        The restrictions and covenants in our debt agreements could limit our ability to obtain future financings, make needed capital expenditures, withstand a future downturn in our business, or the economy in general, or otherwise conduct necessary corporate activities. These covenants may prevent us from taking advantage of business opportunities that arise.

        A large share of our consolidated cash balances are outside the United States and most of our interest-bearing debt is borrowed by U.S. entities. In the event that we would have to repatriate cash from international operations to meet cash needs in the U.S., we are likely to incur significant income tax expenses to repatriate that cash.

        A breach of any of these covenants would result in a default under the applicable debt agreement. A default, if not waived, could result in acceleration of the debt outstanding under the agreement and in a default with respect to, and acceleration of, the debt outstanding under our other debt agreements. The accelerated debt would become immediately due and payable. If that should occur, we may not be able to pay all such debt or to borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. Even if new financing were then available, it may not be on terms that are favorable to us.

17

Table of Contents

We assumed an underfunded pension liability as part of the Delta acquisition and the combined company may be required to increase funding of the plan and/or be subject to restrictions on the use of excess cash.

        Delta is the sponsor of a United Kingdom defined benefit pension plan that, as of December 28, 2013, covered approximately 6,500 inactive or retired former Delta employees. At December 28, 2013, this plan was, for accounting purposes, underfunded by approximately £93.8 million ($154.4 million). The current agreement with the trustees of the pension plan for annual funding was approximately £10.0 million ($16.0 million) in respect of the funding shortfall and approximately £1.0 million ($1.6 million) in respect of administrative expenses. Although this funding obligation was considered in the offer price for the Delta shares, the underfunded position may adversely affect the combined company as follows:

•

Laws and regulations in the United Kingdom normally require the plan trustees and us to agree on a new funding plan every three years. The next funding plan will be developed in 2015. Changes in actuarial assumptions, including future discount, inflation and interest rates, investment returns and mortality rates, may increase the underfunded position of the pension plan and cause the combined company to increase its funding levels in the pension plan to cover underfunded liabilities.



•

The United Kingdom regulates the pension plan and the trustees represent the interests of covered workers. Laws and regulations, under certain circumstances, could create an immediate funding obligation to the pension plan which could be significantly greater than the £93.8 million ($154.4 million) assumed for accounting purposes as of December 28, 2013. Such immediate funding is calculated by reference to the cost of buying out liabilities on the insurance market, and could affect our ability to use Delta's existing cash or the combined company's future excess cash to grow the business or finance other obligations. The use of Delta's cash and future cash flows beyond the operation of Delta's business or the satisfaction of Delta's obligations would require negotiations with the trustees and regulators.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

        None.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES.

        Our corporate headquarters are located in a leased facility in Omaha, Nebraska, under a lease expiring in 2021. The headquarters of the Company's reportable segments are located in Valley, Nebraska except for the headquarters of the Company's Utility Support Structures segment, which is located in Birmingham, Alabama. We also maintain a management headquarters in Sydney, Australia. Most of our significant manufacturing locations are owned or are subject to long-term renewable leases. Our principal manufacturing locations are in Valley, Nebraska, McCook, Nebraska, Tulsa, Oklahoma, Brenham, Texas, Charmeil, France and Shanghai, China. All of these facilities are owned by us. We believe that our manufacturing capabilities and capacities are adequate for us to effectively serve our customers. Our capital spending programs consist of investment for replacement, achieving operational efficiencies and expand capacities where needed. Our principal operating locations by reportable segment are listed below.

        Engineered Infrastructure Products segment North America manufacturing locations are in Nebraska, Texas, Indiana, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington and Canada. The largest of these operations are in Valley, Nebraska and Brenham, Texas, both of which are owned facilities. We have communication components distribution locations in New York, California and Georgia. International locations are in France, the Netherlands, Finland, Estonia, England, Germany, Poland, Morocco, Australia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, India and China. The largest of these operations are in Charmeil, France and Shanghai, China, both of which are owned facilities. Access

18

Table of Contents

systems manufacturing locations are located in Australia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia and China.

        Utility Support Structures segment North America manufacturing locations are in Alabama, Georgia, Florida, California, Texas, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Kansas, Nebraska and Mexico. The largest of these operations are in Tulsa, Oklahoma, Monterrey, Mexico and Hazleton, Pennsylvania. The Tulsa and Monterrey facilities are owned and the Hazleton facility is located on both owned and leased property. Principal international manufacturing locations are in China and France.

        Coatings segment North America operations include U.S. operations located in Nebraska, Illinois, California, Minnesota, Kansas, Iowa, Indiana, Oregon, Utah, Oklahoma, Virginia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina and three locations near Toronto, Canada. International operations are located in Australia, Malaysia and India.

        Irrigation segment North America manufacturing operations are located in Valley and McCook, Nebraska. Our principal manufacturing operations serving international markets are located in Uberaba, Brazil, Nigel, South Africa, Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates, Madrid, Spain and Shandong, China. All facilities are owned except for China, which is leased.

        Our other North America operations are located in Nebraska and Oregon. International operations are located in Australia (forged steel grinding media).

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

        We are not a party to, nor are any of our properties subject to, any material legal proceedings. We are, from time to time, engaged in routine litigation incidental to our businesses.

ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

        Not Applicable.

Executive Officers of the Company

        Our executive officers at February 16, 2014, their ages, positions held, and the business experience of each during the past five years are, as follows:

        Mogens C. Bay, age 65, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since January 1997.

        Terry J. McClain, age 66, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from January 1997 to February 2013 and since August 2013.

        Todd G. Atkinson, age 57, Executive Vice President since February 2011. Chief Executive Officer of Delta plc from July 2003 until February 2011.

        Mark C. Jaksich, age 56, Vice President and Controller since February 2000.

        Walter P. Pasko, age 63, Vice President-Procurement since May 2002.

        Brian J. Desigio, age 44, Vice President-Corporate Development since April 2008.

        Vanessa K. Brown, age 61, Vice President-Human Resources since July 2011. Director of Human Resources of North America Engineered Infrastructure Products division from 1997 until 2011.

19

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

        Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "VMI". We had approximately 4,500 shareholders of common stock at December 28, 2013. Other stock information required by this item is included in Note 20 "Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)" to the consolidated financial statements and incorporated herein by reference.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

        During the fourth quarter, the shares reflected above were those delivered to the Company by employees as part of stock option exercises, either to cover the purchase price of the option or the related taxes payable by the employee as part of the option exercise. The price paid per share was the market price at the date of exercise.

20

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

SELECTED FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL DATA

21

Table of Contents

22

Table of Contents

23

Table of Contents

24

Table of Contents

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Forward-Looking Statements

        Management's discussion and analysis, and other sections of this annual report, contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that management has made in light of experience in the industries in which the Company operates, as well as management's perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate under the circumstances. These statements are not guarantees of performance or results. They involve risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond the Company's control) and assumptions. Management believes that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions. Many factors could affect the Company's actual financial results and cause them to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things, risk factors described from time to time in the Company's reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as future economic and market circumstances, industry conditions, company performance and financial results, operating efficiencies, availability and price of raw materials, availability and market acceptance of new products, product pricing, domestic and international competitive environments, and actions and policy changes of domestic and foreign governments.

        The following discussion and analysis provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our consolidated results of operations and financial position. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes.

        References to 2013 and 2012 relate to the fifty-two week periods ended December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, respectively. 2011 relates to the fifty-three week period ended December 31, 2011.

25

Table of Contents

General

26

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FISCAL 2013 COMPARED WITH FISCAL 2012

Overview

        On a consolidated basis, the increase in net sales in 2013, as compared with 2012, reflected improved sales in all reportable segments while sales were down in the "Other" category. The increase in net sales in 2013, as compared with 2012, was due to the following factors:

        Volume effects are estimated based on a physical production or sales measure, such as tons. As the products we sell are not uniform in nature, pricing and mix relate to a combination of changes in sales prices and the attributes of the product sold. Accordingly, pricing and mix changes do not necessarily result in increased operating income. Acquisitions included Locker Group Holdings ("Locker") and Pure Metal Galvanizing ("PMG"). We acquired PMG in December 2012 and Locker in February 2013. We report Locker in the Engineered Infrastructure Products segment and PMG in the Coatings segment.

        In 2013, we realized a decrease in operating profit, as compared with 2012, due to currency translation effects. On average, the U.S. dollar strengthened in particular against the Australian dollar, Brazilian Real and the South Africa Rand, resulting in less operating profit in U.S. dollar terms. The breakdown of this effect by the affected segment was as follows:

        The increase in gross margin (gross profit as a percent of sales) in 2013, as compared with 2012, was due to a combination of improved sales prices and sales mix, improved factory operations and moderating raw material costs in 2013, as compared with 2012. In general, our cost of steel and other raw materials were slightly lower in 2013, as compared with 2012. 2013 included a $12.2 million fixed asset impairment loss in our electrolytic manganese dioxide (EMD) operation, which was recorded as Product Cost of Sales. The impairment was a result of continued global oversupply of global manganese dioxide in the market, increased price competition and increasing input costs. In addition, a major customer advised us that its purchases from us in 2014 would be substantially below prior years. As future prospects for the operation were not as favorable as the past, we undertook an impairment review in the fourth quarter of 2013, which resulted in the $12.2 million impairment.

        Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) spending in 2013 increased over 2012, mainly due to the following factors:

•

Expenses recorded by Locker and PMG of $19.4 million;



•

Increased employee incentive accruals of $13.8 million, due to improved operating results and increased share price in valuing long-term incentive plans;

27

Table of Contents

•

Increased compensation expenses of $8.2 million, mainly associated with increased employment levels and salary increases;



•

Increased doubtful account provisions of $3.1 million, principally in the Irrigation segment, and;



•

Increased deferred compensation expenses of $2.4 million, which was offset by the same amount of other income.

        In addition, certain non-recurring items affecting the comparisons of SG&A expenses included:

•

The sale of one of our galvanizing facilities in Australia resulted in a gain of $4.6 million in 2013, which was reported as a reduction of SG&A expense, and;



•

Insurance proceeds received related to a fire in one of our galvanizing facilities in Australia resulted in a non-recurring reduction in SG&A in 2012 of $2.0 million.

        On a reportable segment basis, all segments realized improved operating income in 2013, as compared with 2012.

        Net interest expense increased in 2013, as compared with 2012, due to a combination of lower interest income and slightly higher interest expense. Interest income for 2013 was lower than 2012 due mainly to lower interest rates and lower average cash balances in Australia. The increase in interest expense principally was due to higher bank fees and interest incurred due to increased short-term borrowings to finance working capital in our India operation.

        The increase in other income in 2013, as compared with 2012, mainly was attributable to $2.4 million of higher investment gains in our deferred compensation plan assets. This benefit was offset by an increase in SG&A expense of the same amount.

        Our effective income tax rate in 2013 was comparable with 2012. In 2012 and 2013, U.K. tax rates were collectively reduced from 26% to 20%. Accordingly, we reduced the value of our deferred tax assets associated with net operating loss carryforwards and certain timing differences by $8.3 million in 2013 ($4.8 million in 2012), with a corresponding increase in income tax expense. The effects of the U.K. tax rate decrease were offset somewhat by approximately $3.2 million of tax benefits associated with the 2013 sale of our nonconsolidated investment in South Africa and $1.8 million of increased research and development tax credits in the U.S.

        Earnings in non-consolidated subsidiaries were lower in 2013, as compared with 2012, due to the sale of our 49% owned manganese materials operation in February 2013. There was no significant gain or loss on the sale.

        Earnings attributable to non-controlling interests in 2013 was lower than 2012, mainly due to the impairment loss recorded in our electromagnetic manganese dioxide (EMD) operation. The total after-tax impairment loss was approximately $8.8 million. Our proportionate share of this loss was $4.6 million ($0.17 per share) and the remainder was attributable to the non-controlling interest. This decrease was offset to a degree by improved earnings realized by our other operations that are less than 100% owned.

        In December 2013, we reduced our ownership interest in the EMD operation to below 50% and deconsolidated this entity. Accordingly, we recognized a $12.0 million after-tax loss, or $0.45 per share, in accordance with the relevant accounting standards. The loss upon deconsolidation consisted of $8.6 million of currency translation adjustments previously recorded in the balance sheet and $3.4 million related to reducing the book value of the remaining EMD investment to fair value, including $1.7 million in deferred income taxes.

28

Table of Contents

        The reported earnings per share in 2013 of $10.35 included the deconsolidation and fixed asset impairment loss at EMD, which aggregated to $0.62 per share. The earnings per share improvement in 2013 over 2012 was the result of higher net earnings in 2013, as compared with 2012.

        Our cash flows generated by operations were approximately $396.4 million in 2013, as compared with $197.1 million in 2012. The increase in operating cash flow in 2013 was the result of improved net earnings and less additional working capital to support the improved sales in 2013, as compared with 2012.

Engineered Infrastructure Products (EIP) segment

        The increase in net sales in 2013, as compared with 2012, was mainly due to improved access systems and communication products sales. Global lighting sales in 2013 were comparable with 2012. The transportation market for lighting and traffic structures in the U.S., while stable, continues to be challenging, due in part to the lack of long-term U.S. federal highway funding legislation. Sales in other market channels such as sales to lighting fixture manufacturers and commercial construction projects in fiscal 2013 improved somewhat as compared with the same periods in 2012. In Europe, sales in 2013 were approximately 7% lower than 2012, as low economic growth and budget restrictions have hampered government roadway spending activity and demand for lighting structures.

        Communication product line sales improved in 2013, as compared with 2012. On a regional basis, North American sales in 2013 improved over the same periods in 2012 by $16.9 million. The increase in North America sales was mainly attributable to stronger sales demand for components due to 4G wireless communication development. In China, sales of wireless communication structures in 2013 were lower than 2012, as we believe local wireless communication carriers have delayed their 4G investment upgrades until 2014.

        Access systems product line sales improved in 2013, as compared with 2012, due to the Locker acquisition in February 2013. Otherwise, access systems sales in 2013 were lower than 2012, due a combination of slowness in mining sector investment in Australia, exchange rate effects due to a weaker Australian dollar in 2013 and related competitive pricing effects. Highway safety product sales in 2013 were comparable with 2012, as growth in spending for roads and highways in Australia continues to be affected by budgetary restrictions.

        Operating income for the segment in 2013 increased, as compared with 2012, due primarily to:

•

improved operating performance of our lighting operations as a result of better factory operating performance (approximately $18.2 million);



•

improved North American communication product sales (approximately $5.9 million), and;



•

operating profit generated from Locker (approximately $4.7 million).

        The increase in SG&A spending was attributable to Locker (approximately $14.7 million). SG&A spending otherwise was lower in 2013, as compared with 2012, mainly associated with cost cutting measures taken in Europe in the third and fourth quarters of 2012.

Utility Support Structures (Utility) segment

        In the Utility segment, the sales increase in 2013, as compared with 2012, was due mainly to improved sales in the U.S. market. International sales were slightly lower in 2013, as compared with 2012, as bid projects in the Asia Pacific region were somewhat lower.

        In the U.S., electrical utility companies continue to invest in the electrical grid at a high rate, as evidenced by record backlogs at December 29, 2012 and continued strong order flow in 2013. Certain

29

Table of Contents

low margin orders that shipped and were completed in 2012 contributed to improved sales prices and mix in 2013, as compared with 2012.

        Operating income in 2013, as compared with 2012, increased due to improved sales pricing and mix as well as increased volumes. The improvements in sales pricing and mix largely were related to strong market conditions and certain large low margin orders that were completed in 2012 and did not recur in 2013. In addition, 2012 included approximately $12.9 million of unanticipated production and rework costs associated with one large order. These costs did not recur in 2013, which contributed to the gross profit improvements in 2013, as compared with 2012. The increase in SG&A expense in 2013, as compared with 2012, were mainly due to increased employee compensation (approximately $3.6 million) and incentives (approximately $1.7 million) associated with the increase in business levels and operating income.

Coatings segment

        Coatings segment sales increased in 2013, as compared with 2012, due mainly to the December 2012 PMG acquisition. North America experienced slightly lower external demand for galvanizing services, although internal demand from our other segments was higher in 2013, as compared with 2012. Asia Pacific volumes in 2013 were lower than 2012 due to lower demand in Australia. Unit pricing in 2013 was comparable with 2012.

        The increase in segment operating income in 2013, as compared with 2012, was mainly due to the gain on the sale of an Australian galvanizing operation in the second quarter of 2013 of $4.6 million, and operating income provided by PMG (approximately $4.1 million). These two positive effects on 2013 operating income were offset to an extent by the effect of lower external demand for coatings services in Australia and the settlement of a dispute with a vendor of approximately $0.9 million in 2012.

        In 2013, we had a kettle failure in one North America facility and a fire in another. In 2012, we realized recoveries related to fire and storm damages at one of our Australian galvanizing facilities. The effect of these events on 2013 operating profit was not significant, as the related insurance recoveries to this point approximated certain related incurred costs and the carrying value of assets that were damaged. The insurance claims process is continuing and expected to conclude in 2014.

Irrigation segment

        The increase in Irrigation segment net sales in 2013, as compared with 2012, was mainly due to sales volume increases in both North American and International markets. The pricing and sales mix effect was generally due to sales price increases that took effect in 2012 to recover higher material costs in early 2012. In global markets, the sales growth was due to strong net farm income and agricultural economies around the world. We believe that farm commodity prices have been generally favorable due to strong demand, including consumption in the production of ethanol and other fuels, and traditionally low inventories of major farm commodities. In addition, in North America, we believe widespread drought throughout much of the country in 2012 further highlighted the benefits of center pivot irrigation and contributed to enhanced demand for our products. In international markets, sales improved in 2013, as compared with 2012, mainly due to increased activity in Brazil, Eastern Europe and Australia. These increases were offset somewhat by lower sales in China, Argentina and the Middle East, which were due to certain economic and political uncertainties in these regions.

        Operating income for the segment improved in 2013 over 2012, due to improved global sales unit volumes and related price increases. Moderating raw material prices in light of higher selling prices also contributed to improved operating income in 2013, as compared with 2012. The most significant reasons for the increase in SG&A expense in 2013, as compared with 2012, related to employee compensation costs and incentives (approximately $7.3 million), approximately $2.6 million in provisions

30

Table of Contents

for international receivables recorded in 2013 and other expenses incurred to support the business activity levels and product development.

Other

        This unit includes the grinding media, industrial tubing, EMD and industrial fasteners operations. The decrease in sales in 2013, as compared with 2012, was mainly due to lower sales prices in the tubing and grinding media operations due to lower steel prices and exchange rate translation effects. Operating income in 2013 was lower than 2012, mainly due to a $12.2 million fixed asset impairment charge recorded by the EMD operation. Otherwise, lower raw material prices helped to dampen the effects of lower selling prices on operating income.

Net corporate expense

        Net corporate expense in 2013 increased over 2012. This increase were mainly due to:

•

higher employee incentives of approximately $6.3 million associated with improved net earnings and share price, which affected long-term incentive plans;



•

higher compensation and employee benefit costs (approximately $4.2 million);



•

increased expenses associated with the Delta Pension Plan (approximately $2.5 million), and;



•

insurance settlements realized in 2012 related to a fire and storm damage to one of our galvanizing facilities in Australia of $2.0 million that did not recur in 2013;

FISCAL 2012 COMPARED WITH FISCAL 2011

Overview

        On a consolidated basis, the increase in net sales in 2012, as compared with 2011, was due to the following factors:

•

Unit sales volumes increased approximately $353 million in 2012, as compared with 2011. All reportable segments contributed to the higher sales volumes, with the most significant unit sales increases within the Utility Support Structures and Irrigation segments. Depending on the segment, unit volumes are measured in tons, units or some other physical measure of volume.



•

Sales prices and mix in 2012, as compared with 2011, were favorable, resulting in increased sales of approximately $50 million. As many of our products are either built to order or configured to customer specifications, sales mix can be due to a number of factors, in addition to pricing. These factors may include product specifications, options and other factors that may affect the unit price at which a product is sold. In some cases, pricing and mix may affect our cost of the product sold.



•

2012 included 52 weeks of operations, as compared with 2011, which was 53 weeks. This was the result of our year ending the last Saturday in December. Accordingly, all 2011 operational figures were higher than had the year been 52 weeks in length. The estimated effect of our 2011 net sales and net earnings due to the extra week of operations was approximately $50 million and $3 million, respectively.

        Foreign currency translation factors, in the aggregate, resulted in lower net sales and operating income in 2012, as compared with 2011. On average, the U.S. dollar strengthened against most currencies in 2012. The most significant currencies that contributed to this movement were the euro,

31

Table of Contents

Brazilian real and the South African rand. On a segment basis, the approximate currency effects on net sales and operating income in 2012, as compared with 2011, were as follows (in millions of dollars):

        The increase in gross profit margin (gross profit as a percent of sales) in 2012, as compared with 2011, was primarily due to improved sales pricing and mix and moderating raw material costs in 2012 as compared with 2011. Steel prices and zinc prices in 2012 were down slightly as compared with 2011. LIFO expense in 2012 was $10.7 lower than 2011, contributing to the comparatively higher gross profit margin in 2012, as compared with 2011.

        Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense in 2012, as compared with 2011, increased mainly due to the following factors:

•

Increased compensation expenses of approximately $8.0 million, associated with increased employment levels and increased employee benefit costs;



•

Increased employee incentive accruals of approximately $10.6 million, due to improved operating results; and



•

Deferred compensation expense of $2.4 million incurred in 2012 associated with the increase in deferred compensation plan liabilities. The corresponding increase in deferred compensation plan assets was recorded as a decrease in "Other" expense.

        These increases were offset to a degree by foreign exchange transaction effects of $4.7 million. SG&A spending as a percent of sales decreased from 15.2% in 2011 to 13.9% in 2012, as we achieved leverage of the fixed portion of SG&A expense in light of the sales increase.

        The increase in operating income on a reportable segment basis in fiscal 2012, as compared with 2011, was due to improved operating performance in all reportable segments. The most significant increases were in the Irrigation and Utility segments.

        The decrease in net interest expense in 2012, as compared with 2011, was the net effect of lower interest expense of $4.5 million and lower interest income of $1.0 million. The decrease in interest expense was attributable to interest savings realized from the refinancing of our $150 million of senior subordinated debt in June 2011 and approximately $2.8 million of expense incurred in the second quarter of 2011 related to the refinancing of our $150 million of senior subordinated notes. The decrease in interest income was due to interest received on certain income tax refunds in 2011. Average borrowing levels in 2012 were comparable with 2011.

        The decrease in "Other" expenses in 2012, as compared with 2011, of $3.0 million was mainly due to investment returns in the assets held in our deferred compensation plan of $2.4 million. The increase in the value of these assets was offset by a corresponding increase in our deferred compensation liabilities, which was reflected as an increase in SG&A expense. Accordingly, there was no effect on net earnings from these investment gains.

32

Table of Contents

        Our effective income tax rate in 2012 of 35.2% was higher than the 2011 effective rate of 2.0%. Our effective tax rate in 2011 was abnormally low, mainly due to tax benefits associated with the legal entity restructuring of Delta Ltd. in the fourth quarter of 2011. Aside from these non-recurring benefits, our 2011 effective tax would have been approximately 33%. Our effective tax rate in 2012 was affected by the following factors that contributed to increased income tax expense:

•

In 2012, the U.K. reduced its income tax rate from 26% to 24%. As a result, our income tax expense increased in 2012 by $4.8 million, mainly due to the revaluation of deferred income tax assets, and;



•

Adjustments to the final accounting calculations related to the 2011 legal restructuring of Delta Ltd. resulted in a $2.4 million unfavorable adjustment.

        Going forward, depending on our geographic mix of earnings and currently enacted income tax rates in the countries in which we operate, we expect our effective tax rate to approximate 34%.

        Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests was lower in 2012, as compared with 2011, mainly due to lower net earnings in those consolidated operations that are less than 100% owned, the most significant of what was the manganese dioxide operation. In addition, $2.4 million of the 2012 decrease was due to our purchase of the noncontrolling interest in our grinding media operation in June 2011. This operation was previously 40% owned by noncontrolling interests.

        Our cash flows provided by operations were $197.1 million in 2012, as compared with $149.7 million in 2011. While net earnings in 2012 was comparable with 2011, $66.0 million of 2011 earnings was due to tax benefits resulting from the Delta Ltd. legal reorganization, which were non-cash in nature.

Engineered Infrastructure Products (EIP) segment

        The increase in EIP segment net sales in 2012, as compared with 2011, was due to improved sales volumes of approximately $33 million, $22 million of favorable pricing and sales mix changes, offset to a degree by unfavorable foreign exchange translation effects of approximately $15 million. The pricing increases largely followed raw material inflation realized in 2011.

        In the lighting product line, North American sales in 2012 were up modestly from 2011. The increase in sales resulted from higher sales prices and favorable sales mix. The transportation market for lighting and traffic structures continues to be steady but not particularly strong. While a two-year extension to the current U.S. highway funding legislation was enacted in the of 2012, this event has not yet affected the market for lighting and traffic structures. We also believe that state budget issues are limiting roadway project activity. Sales in other market channels such as sales to lighting fixture manufacturers and commercial construction projects in 2012 were comparable with 2011. In Europe, lighting sales in 2012 were lower than 2011. We divested our Turkish and Italian operations in late 2011, resulting in lower sales in 2012, as compared with 2011, of $17.5 million. Current economic conditions in Europe are weak and uncertain. As a result, public spending for streets and highways is under pressure, as governments cope with lower tax receipts and budget deficits. However, lighting sales in local currency were higher in 2012, as compared with 2011. Stronger sales in France, Scandinavia and the U.K. were offset somewhat by weaker sales volumes in northern Europe. Lighting sales in the Asia Pacific region in 2012 were comparable with 2011.

        Communication product line sales in 2012 were improved over 2011. North America sales in 2012 were $27 million higher than 2011. The increase in sales was attributable to improved market conditions (somewhat attributable to the build out of 4G wireless technology) and the resolution of the proposed AT&T/T-Mobile merger, which we believe slowed sales activity for structures and components in 2011. In China, sales of wireless communication structures in 2012 were comparable with 2011.

33

Table of Contents

        Sales in the access systems product line in 2012 were improved as compared with 2011, as industrial production investments in the mining and energy economic sectors are increasing in the Asia Pacific region.

        Sales of highway safety products in 2012 were slightly higher than 2011. While public spending on roadways in Australia did not grow in 2012, establishment of sales channels in other countries in the Asia Pacific region contributed to sales volume increases for the product line.

        Operating income for the segment in 2012 was higher than 2011. Improved operating income resulted from higher sales volumes, improved sales prices and moderating raw material costs (including $2.7 million of lower LIFO expense). These improvements were offset by factory productivity issues that negatively affected operating income by approximately $14.3 million. The productivity matters mainly were due to excessive start-up costs associated with capacity expansions in the U.S. and various factory productivity matters in the Europe and Asia Pacific regions. The increase in SG&A spending in 2012, as compared with 2011, mainly was attributable to higher compensation costs of $7.6 million and increased employee incentives of $5.0 million. These increases were offset to a degree by a $3.0 million write down in a trade name recorded in 2011 and currency translation effects of $2.6 million.

Utility Support Structures (Utility) segment

        In the Utility segment, the sales increase in the 2012, as compared with 2011, was primarily due to improved unit sales volumes of approximately $239 million. In U.S. markets, investments in the electrical grid by utility companies is increasing, resulting in improved sales of transmission and substation structures. The effect of sales mix was favorable in 2012, as compared with 2011, by approximately $10 million. Sales mix was mainly related to certain large orders that were taken in 2010 and early 2011, when market pricing was particularly low. As market conditions improved, pricing recovered to a degree, resulting in improved pricing and mix as the year progressed. Sales in international markets in 2012 were improved over 2011. Sales in the Asia Pacific region are higher, offset to some extent by lower sales in Europe and the Middle East.

        Operating income in 2012, as compared with 2011, increased due to the increase in North America sales volume, moderating raw material costs and leverage effects on fixed SG&A and factory expenses. These positive effects were offset to a degree by $12.9 million of additional rework and other unanticipated costs related to certain large orders. The increase in SG&A expense for the segment in 2012 as compared with 2011, was mainly due to increased employee compensation of $3.1 million and increased sales commissions of $1.0 million, associated with the increase in business levels.

Coatings segment

        Coatings segment sales to outside customers in 2012 was comparable with 2011, as improved sales in the United States was offset to a degree by lower sales in the Asia Pacific region. In the United States, we experienced broad-based improved demand from customers, especially in the agriculture, petrochemical and energy economic sectors, which included higher sales for galvanizing services to our other segments. Asia Pacific volumes in 2012 were down from 2011, due to slowness in the Australian industrial economy not related to mining. Average selling prices in 2012 were comparable with 2011.

        The increase in segment operating income in 2012, as compared with 2011, was mainly due to improved productivity and operating leverage through volume increases and lower zinc costs. The effect of lower zinc costs on segment operating income in 2012, as compared with 2011, was approximately $5.7 million. SG&A expenses for the segment in 2012, as compared with 2011, were slightly lower, mainly due to a $0.9 million favorable dispute settlement with a vendor in 2012 and a $0.8 million write down of a trade name recorded in 2011. In 2012, we completed the insurance settlement related to the 2011 storm and fire at one of our facilities in Australia. Settlements in 2012 totaled $1.2 million, as compared with $1.5 million in 2011, which were recorded in operating income.

34

Table of Contents

Irrigation segment

        The increase in Irrigation segment net sales in 2012, as compared with 2011, was mainly due to improved sales volumes of approximately $78 million and favorable pricing and sales mix of approximately $23 million. These increases were offset by unfavorable currency translation effects of approximately $15 million in 2012, as compared with 2011. The pricing and sales mix effect was generally due to sales price increases that took effect in the second half of 2011 to recover higher material costs in early 2011. In global markets, the sales growth was due to very strong agricultural economies around the world. Farm commodity prices continue to be favorable, with a positive outlook for net farm income in most markets around the world. We believe that farm commodity prices have been favorable due to strong demand, including consumption in the production of ethanol and other fuels, and traditionally low inventories of major farm commodities. We believe the drought conditions in much of the U.S. this summer contributed to the increased demand for irrigation equipment and related service parts in 2012. The very dry growing conditions throughout much of the U.S. highlight the benefits of irrigation in order to maintain crop yields under these circumstances. In international markets, the sales improvement in 2012, as compared with 2011, was also realized in most markets due to generally favorable economic conditions in the global farm economy.

        Operating income for the segment improved in 2012, as compared with 2011, due to improved sales unit volumes and improved sales prices in light of stable material costs. The higher average selling prices resulted from rising material costs in 2011, when sales price increases lagged material cost inflation. The stability in raw material purchase costs also resulted in $4.6 million in lower LIFO expenses in 2012, as compared with 2011. SG&A expenses in 2012 were comparable with 2011.

Other

        This category includes the grinding media, industrial tubing, electrolytic manganese and industrial fasteners operations. In 2012, sales were lower than 2011, mainly due currency translation effects of $5.7 million and slightly lower sales in grinding media. Operating income in 2012 was comparable with 2011, as improvement in tubing was offset by lower operating earnings in our manganese dioxide operation.

Net corporate expense

        Net corporate expense in 2012 was higher than 2011, mainly due to:

•

higher employee incentives of $5.1 million associated with improved net earnings and share price, which affected long-term incentive plans, and;



•

higher deferred compensation expenses (approximately $2.4 million) related to investment returns on assets in the deferred compensation plan. These increases are offset by decreases in "Other" expense.

        These increases were offset by lower corporate spending in various areas, including lower expenses for the Delta Pension Plan of $1.2 million.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flows

        Working Capital and Operating Cash Flows—Net working capital was $1,161.3 million at December 28, 2013, as compared with $1,013.5 million at December 29, 2012. The increase in net working capital in 2013 mainly resulted from increased cash on hand due to increased profitability on higher sales and slightly lower receivables and inventory on-hand in 2013. Operating cash flow was $396.4 million in 2013, as compared with $197.1 million in 2012 and $149.7 million in 2011. The

35

Table of Contents

increase in operating cash flow in 2013 mainly was the result of improved operations and management of working capital. The loss upon the deconsolidation of EMD of $12.0 million and the impairment of EMD's fixed assets of $12.2 million were non-cash in nature. The increase in operating cash flow in 2012 as compared with 2011 mainly resulted from the reduction in the non-cash tax benefits associated with the Delta Ltd. legal reorganization recorded as a reduction of income tax expense ($66.0 million) in fiscal 2011.

        Investing Cash Flows—Capital spending in fiscal 2013 was $106.8 million, as compared with $97.1 million in fiscal 2012. The most significant capital spending projects in 2013 included certain capacity expansions in the Utility and Irrigation segments. We expect our capital spending for the 2014 fiscal year to be approximately $100 million. In 2013, investing cash flows included proceeds from asset sales of $37.6 million, principally consisting of $29.2 million received from the sale of our 49% owned non-consolidated subsidiary in South Africa and $8.2 million received from the sale of the Western Australia galvanizing operation. Investing cash flows included $63.2 million paid for the Locker and Armorflex acquisitions in 2013 and $45.7 million paid for the PMG acquisition in 2012.

        Financing Cash Flows—Our total interest-bearing debt was $490.1 million at December 28, 2013, as compared with $486.2 million at December 29, 2012. Financing cash flows in 2013 included approximately $9.3 million to acquire the remaining 40% of the shares of Valley Irrigation South Africa Pty. Ltd. and $11.6 million in cash held by EMD that was removed from our consolidated balance sheet upon deconsolidation. 2011 financing cash flows included approximately $25.3 million to acquire the remaining 40% of the shares of Donhad Pty. Ltd.

Sources of Financing and Capital

        We have historically funded our growth, capital spending and acquisitions through a combination of operating cash flows and debt financing. We have an internal long-term objective to maintain long-term debt as a percent of invested capital at or below 40%. At December 28, 2013, our long-term debt to invested capital ratio was 22.3%, as compared with 23.9% at December 29, 2012. Subject to our level of acquisition activity and steel industry operating conditions (which could affect the levels of inventory we need to fulfill customer commitments), we plan to maintain this ratio below 40% in 2014.

        Our debt financing at December 28, 2013 consisted primarily of long-term debt. We also maintain certain short-term bank lines of credit totaling $105.2 million, $87.0 million of which was unused at December 28, 2013. Our long-term debt principally consists of:

•

$450 million face value ($461 million carrying value) of senior unsecured notes that bear interest at 6.625% per annum and are due in April 2020. We are allowed to repurchase the notes at specified prepayment premiums. These notes are guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries.



•

$400 million revolving credit agreement with a group of banks. We may increase the credit facility by up to an additional $200 million at any time, subject to participating banks increasing the amount of their lending commitments. The interest rate on our borrowings will be, at our option, either:



(a)

LIBOR (based on a 1, 2, 3 or 6 month interest period, as selected by us) plus 125 to 225 basis points (inclusive of facility fees), depending on our ratio of debt to earnings before taxes, interest, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), or;



(b)

the higher of



•

The higher of (a) the prime lending rate and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis points plus in each case, 25 to 125 basis points (inclusive of facility fees), depending on our ratio of debt to EBITDA, or

36

Table of Contents

•

LIBOR (based on a 1 week interest period) plus 125 to 225 basis points (inclusive of facility fees), depending on our ratio of debt to EBITDA

        At December 28, 2013, we had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit agreement. The revolving credit agreement has a termination date of August 15, 2017 and contains certain financial covenants that may limit our additional borrowing capability under the agreement. At December 28, 2013, we had the ability to borrow $382.1 million under this facility, after consideration of standby letters of credit of $17.9 million associated with certain insurance obligations.

        These debt agreements contain covenants that require us to maintain certain coverage ratios and may limit us with respect to certain business activities, including capital expenditures. Our key debt covenants are as follows:

•

Interest-bearing debt is not to exceed 3.50x EBITDA of the prior four quarters; and



•

EBITDA over the prior four quarters must be at least 2.50x our interest expense over the same period.

        At December 28, 2013, we were in compliance with all covenants related to these debt agreements. The key covenant calculations at December 28, 2013 were as follows:

        The calculation of EBITDA-last four quarters is presented under the column for fiscal 2013 in footnote (b) to the table "Selected Five-Year Data" in Item 6—Selected Financial Data.

        Our businesses are cyclical, but we have diversity in our markets, from a product, customer and a geographical standpoint. We have demonstrated the ability to effectively manage through business cycles and maintain liquidity. We have consistently generated operating cash flows in excess of our capital expenditures. Based on our available credit facilities, recent issuance of senior unsecured notes and our history of positive operational cash flows, we believe that we have adequate liquidity to meet our needs for fiscal 2014 and beyond.

        We have not made any provision for U.S. income taxes in our financial statements on approximately $644.3 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, as we intend to reinvest those earnings. Of our cash balances of $613.7 million at December 28, 2013, $395.1 million is held in entities outside the United States. If we need to repatriate foreign cash balances to the United States to meet our cash needs, income taxes would be paid to the extent that those cash repatriations were undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. The income taxes that we would pay if cash were repatriated depends on the amounts to be repatriated and from which country. If we repatriated all of our cash outside the United States to the United States, depending on the timing and nature of such repatriations, we estimate that we would pay approximately from $49.8 million to $138.3 million in income taxes to repatriate that cash.

37

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AND FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS

        We have future financial obligations related to (1) payment of principal and interest on interest-bearing debt, (2) Delta pension plan contributions, (3) operating leases and (4) purchase obligations. These obligations at December 28, 2013 were as follows (in millions of dollars):

        Long-term debt mainly consisted of $450.0 million principal amount of senior unsecured notes. At December 28, 2013, we had no outstanding borrowings under our bank revolving credit agreement. Obligations under these agreements may be accelerated in event of non-compliance with debt covenants. The Delta pension plan contributions are related to the current cash funding commitments to the plan with the plan's trustees. Operating leases relate mainly to various production and office facilities and are in the normal course of business.

        Acquisition earn-out payments relate to anticipated payments to the prior owners of PMG and Locker, as a portion of the consideration paid for these entities is contingent in nature. The earn-out arrangements generally relate to the meeting of certain profitability targets. Locker's target period ends in February 2015 and PMG's ends in December 2017.

        Unconditional purchase commitments relate to purchase orders for zinc, aluminum and steel, all of which we plan to use in 2014, and certain capital investments planned for 2014. We believe the quantities under contract are reasonable in light of normal fluctuations in business levels and we expect to use the commodities under contract during the contract period.

        At December 28, 2013, we had approximately $43.9 million of various long-term liabilities related to certain income tax, environmental and other matters. These items are not scheduled above because we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate as to the timing of any potential payments.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

        We have operating lease obligations to unaffiliated parties on leases of certain production and office facilities and equipment. These leases are in the normal course of business and generally contain no substantial obligations for us at the end of the lease contracts. We also maintain standby letters of credit for contract performance on certain sales contracts.

MARKET RISK

Changes in Prices

        Certain key materials we use are commodities traded in worldwide markets and are subject to fluctuations in price. The most significant materials are steel, aluminum, zinc and natural gas. Over the last several years, prices for these commodities have been volatile. The volatility in these prices was due to such factors as fluctuations in supply and demand conditions, government tariffs and the costs of steel-making inputs. We have also experienced volatility in natural gas prices in the past several years. Our main strategies in managing these risks are a combination of fixed price purchase contracts with our vendors to reduce the volatility in our purchase prices and sales price increases where possible. We use natural gas swap contracts on a limited basis to mitigate the impact of rising gas prices on our operating income.

38

Table of Contents

Risk Management

        Market Risk—The principal market risks affecting us are exposure to interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and natural gas. We normally do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge these exposures (except as described below), nor do we use derivatives for trading purposes.

        Interest Rates—Our interest-bearing debt at December 28, 2013 was mostly fixed rate debt. Our notes payable and a small portion of our long-term debt accrue interest at a variable rate. Assuming average interest rates and borrowings on variable rate debt, a hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would have affected our interest expense in 2013 and 2012 by approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Likewise, we have excess cash balances on deposit in interest-bearing accounts in financial institutions. An increase or decrease in interest rates of ten basis points would have impacted our annual interest earnings in 2013 by approximately $0.4 million.

        Foreign Exchange—Exposures to transactions denominated in a currency other than the entity's functional currency are not material, and therefore the potential exchange losses in future earnings, fair value and cash flows from these transactions are not material. From time to time, as market conditions indicate, we will enter into foreign currency contracts to manage the risks associated with anticipated future transactions and current balance sheet positions that are in currencies other than the functional currencies of our operations. At December 28, 2013, the Company had open foreign currency forward contracts related to a large sales contract that will be settled in Canadian dollars. The notional amount of the open forward contracts to sell Canadian dollars is $28,032 and will be settled by the end of March 2014. Much of our cash in non-U.S. entities is denominated in foreign currencies, where fluctuations in exchange rates will impact our cash balances in U.S. dollar terms. A hypothetical 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar would impact our reported cash balance by approximately $32.7 million in 2013 and $32.4 million in 2012.

        We manage our investment risk in foreign operations by borrowing in the functional currencies of the foreign entities where appropriate. The following table indicates the change in the recorded value of our most significant investments at year-end assuming a hypothetical 10% change in the value of the U.S. Dollar.

        Commodity risk—Natural gas is a significant commodity used in our factories, especially in our Coatings segment galvanizing operations, where natural gas is used to heat tanks that enable the hot-dipped galvanizing process. Natural gas prices are volatile and we mitigate some of this volatility through the use of derivative commodity instruments. Our current policy is to manage this commodity price risk for 0-50% of our U.S. natural gas requirements for the upcoming 6-12 months through the purchase of natural gas swaps based on NYMEX futures prices for delivery in the month being hedged. The objective of this policy is to mitigate the impact on our earnings of sudden, significant increases in the price of natural gas. At December 28, 2013, we have open natural gas swaps for 120,000 MMBtu.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

        The following accounting policies involve judgments and estimates used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements. There is a substantial amount of management judgment used in

39

Table of Contents

preparing financial statements. We must make estimates on a number of items, such as provisions for bad debts, warranties, contingencies, impairments of long-lived assets, and inventory obsolescence. We base our estimates on our experience and on other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Further, we re-evaluate our estimates from time to time and as circumstances change. Actual results may differ under different assumptions or conditions. The selection and application of our critical accounting policies are discussed annually with our audit committee.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        In determining an allowance for accounts receivable that will not ultimately be collected in full, we consider:

•

age of the accounts receivable



•

customer credit history



•

customer financial information



•

reasons for non-payment (product, service or billing issues).

        If our customer's financial condition was to deteriorate, resulting in an impaired ability to make payment, additional allowances may be required.

Warranties

        All of our businesses must meet certain product quality and performance criteria. We rely on historical product claims data to estimate the cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. In determining the accrual for the estimated cost of warranty claims, we consider our experience with:

•

costs to correct the product problem in the field, including labor costs



•

costs for replacement parts



•

other direct costs associated with warranty claims



•

the number of product units subject to warranty claims

        In addition to known claims or warranty issues, we estimate future claims on recent sales. The key assumptions in our estimates are the rates we apply to those recent sales (which is based on historical claims experience) and our expected future warranty costs for products that are covered under warranty for an extended period of time. Our provision for various product warranties was approximately $20.7 million at December 28, 2013. If our estimate changed by 50%, the impact on operating income would be approximately $10.4 million. If our cost to repair a product or the number of products subject to warranty claims is greater than we estimated, then we would have to increase our accrued cost for warranty claims.

Inventories

        We use the last-in first-out (LIFO) method to determine the value of approximately 43% of our inventory. The remaining 57% of our inventory is valued on a first-in first-out (FIFO) basis. In periods of rising costs to produce inventory, the LIFO method will result in lower profits than FIFO, because higher more recent costs are recorded to cost of goods sold than under the FIFO method. Conversely, in periods of falling costs to produce inventory, the LIFO method will result in higher profits than the FIFO method.

        In 2013 and 2012, we experienced lower costs to produce inventory than in the prior year, due mainly to lower cost for steel and steel-related products. This resulted in lower cost of goods sold (and

40

Table of Contents

higher operating income) in 2013 and 2012 of approximately $0.6 million and $3.7 million, respectively, than had our entire inventory been valued on the FIFO method. In 2011, we experienced higher costs compared to previous years and operating income was lower by approximately $7.0 million than had our entire inventory been valued on the FIFO method.

        We write down slow-moving and obsolete inventory by the difference between the value of the inventory and our estimate of the reduced value based on potential future uses, the likelihood that overstocked inventory will be sold and the expected selling prices of the inventory. If our ability to realize value on slow-moving or obsolete inventory is less favorable than assumed, additional inventory write downs may be required.

Depreciation, Amortization and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

        Our long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets acquired in business acquisitions. We have assigned useful lives to our property, plant and equipment and certain intangible assets ranging from 3 to 40 years. In 2013, we determined that the property, plant and equipment in our EMD operation was impaired. The impairment was due to continued global oversupply of global manganese dioxide in the market, increased price competition and increasing input costs. In addition, a major customer advised us that its purchases of EMD in 2014 would be substantially below prior years. As future prospects for the operation were not as favorable as the past, the company undertook an impairment review in the fourth quarter of 2013, which resulted in the $12.2 million impairment.

        We identified twelve reporting units for purposes of evaluating goodwill and we annually evaluate our reporting units for goodwill impairment during the third fiscal quarter, which usually coincides with our strategic planning process. We assess the value of our reporting units using after-tax cash flows from operations (less capital expenses) discounted to present value and as a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). The key assumptions in the discounted cash flow analysis are the discount rate and the projected cash flows. We also use sensitivity analysis to determine the impact of changes in discount rates and cash flow forecasts on the valuation of the reporting units. As allowed for under current accounting standards, we rely on our previous valuations for the annual impairment testing provided that the following criteria for each reporting unit are met: (1) the assets and liabilities that make up the reporting unit have not changed significantly since the most recent fair value determination and (2) the most recent fair value determination resulted in an amount that exceeded the carrying amount of the reporting unit by a substantial margin.

        The valuation of our reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values. Accordingly, no further valuation of our reporting units was necessary. If our assumptions on discount rates and future cash flows change as a result of events or circumstances, and we believe these assets may have declined in value, then we may record impairment charges, resulting in lower profits. Our reporting units are all cyclical and their sales and profitability may fluctuate from year to year. In the evaluation of our reporting units, we look at the long-term prospects for the reporting unit and recognize that current performance may not be the best indicator of future prospects or value, which requires management judgment.

        Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of trade names. We assess the values of these assets apart from goodwill as part of the annual impairment testing. We use the relief-from-royalty method to evaluate our trade names, under which the value of a trade name is determined based on a royalty that could be charged to a third party for using the trade name in question. The royalty, which is based on a reasonable rate applied against estimated future sales, is tax-effected and discounted to present value. The most significant assumptions in this evaluation include estimated future sales, the royalty rate and the after-tax discount rate. For our evaluation purposes, the royalty rates used vary between 0.5% and 1.5% of sales and the after-tax discount rate of 16% to 17%, which we estimate to be the after-tax cost

41

Table of Contents

of capital for such assets. The Company's trade names were tested for impairment in the third quarter of 2013 and 2012 and the Company determined that the value of its trade names were not impaired. In 2011, the Company determined the PiRod and Industrial Galvanizers of America trade names were impaired, which resulted in a write down of $3.8 million.

Income Taxes

        We record valuation allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. We consider future taxable income expectations and tax-planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. If we estimate a deferred tax asset is not likely to be fully realized in the future, a valuation allowance to decrease the amount of the deferred tax asset would decrease net earnings in the period the determination was made. Likewise, if we subsequently determine that we are able to realize all or part of a net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment reducing the valuation allowance would increase net earnings in the period such determination was made.

        At December 28, 2013, we had approximately $146.5 million in deferred tax assets relating to tax credits and loss carryforwards, with a valuation allowance of $107.8 million. As a result of a legal entity restructuring within the Delta group in fiscal 2011, we released of a portion of valuation allowances previously established. Prior to the legal entity restructuring, because these tax losses were generated in the U.K. and Delta had no operations or future income taxable in the U.K., Delta historically did not establish a value on its financial statements for deferred tax assets associated with net operating losses and book and tax basis differences in its pension plan liability. Also, at December 28, 2013, $100.1 million in valuation allowances remain in the Delta entities related to capital loss carryforwards, which are unlikely ever to be realized. If circumstances related to our deferred tax assets change in the future, we may be required to increase or decrease the valuation allowance on these assets, resulting in an increase or decrease in income tax expense and a reduction or increase in net income.

        During 2013 we recorded $1.3 million in income tax expense on $8.6 million of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries which we determined are not permanently invested. Foreign subsidiaries not considered permanently invested had total cash of $17.2 million at December 28, 2013. We have not made any U.S. income tax provision in our financial statements for $644.3 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, as we intend to reinvest those earnings. Foreign subsidiaries considered permanently invested had total cash of $366.8 million at December 28, 2013. If circumstances change and we determine that we are not permanently invested, we would need to record an income tax expense on our financial statements for the resulting income tax that would be paid upon repatriation. The amount of that income tax would depend on how much of those earnings were repatriated and the related timing but could range from a low of $49.8 million to a high of $138.3 million.

        We are subject to examination by taxing authorities in the various countries in which we operate. The tax years subject to examination vary by jurisdiction. We regularly consider the likelihood of additional income tax assessments in each of these taxing jurisdictions based on our experiences related to prior audits and our understanding of the facts and circumstances of the related tax issues. We include in current income tax expense any changes to accruals for potential tax deficiencies. If our judgments related to tax deficiencies differ from our actual experience, our income tax expense could increase or decrease in a given fiscal period.

Pension Benefits

        Delta Ltd. maintains a defined benefit pension plan for qualifying employees in the United Kingdom. There are no active employees as members in the plan. Independent actuaries assist in properly measuring the liabilities and expenses associated with accounting for pension benefits to

42

Table of Contents

eligible employees. In order to use actuarial methods to value the liabilities and expenses, we must make several assumptions. The critical assumptions used to measure pension obligations and expenses are the discount rate and expected rate of return on pension assets.

        We evaluate our critical assumptions at least annually. Key assumptions are based on the following factors:

•

Discount rate is based on the yields available on AA-rated corporate bonds with durational periods similar to that of the pension liabilities.



•

Expected return on plan assets is based on our asset allocation mix and our historical return, taking into consideration current and expected market conditions. Most of the assets in the pension plan are invested in corporate bonds, the expected return of which are estimated based on the yield available on AA rated corporate bonds. The long-term expected returns on equities are based on historic performance over the long-term.



•

Inflation is based on the estimated change in the consumer price index ("CPI") or the retail price index ("RPI"), depending on the relevant plan provisions.

The following tables present the key assumptions used to measure pension expense for 2014 and the estimated impact on 2014 pension expense relative to a change in those assumptions: