UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
ý
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
Commission File Number 1-9025
VISTA GOLD CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Continued under the laws of the Yukon Territory, Canada
None
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
7961 Shaffer Parkway
Suite 5
Littleton, Colorado
80127
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(720) 981-1185
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
18,218,022
Common Shares, without par value, outstanding at August 12, 2005
(An Exploration Stage Enterprise)
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2005
INDEX
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
ITEM 5.
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6.
EXHIBITS
SIGNATURES
2
VISTA GOLD CORP. (An Exploration Stage Enterprise)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - UNAUDITED
(U.S. dollars in thousands)
June 30, 2005
December 31, 2004
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
2,267
5,916
Marketable securities
125
140
Accounts receivable - Note 13
139
345
Supplies inventory, prepaids and other
462
425
Current assets
2,993
6,826
Restricted cash - Note 3
5,028
4,961
Mineral properties - Note 5
20,214
18,109
Plant and equipment - Note 6
1,324
1,351
Hycroft reclamation premium costs
1,481
1,541
23,019
21,001
Total assets
31,040
32,788
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity:
Accounts payable
123
130
Current portion of capital lease obligation
8
Accrued liabilities and other
171
126
Current liabilities
302
256
Capital leases obligation
40
Accrued reclamation and closure costs - Note 10
4,192
4,188
Total liabilities
4,534
4,444
Capital stock, no par value: - Note 7
Preferred - unlimited shares authorized; no shares outstanding
Common - unlimited shares authorized; shares outstanding: 2005 - 18,218,022 and 2004 - 17,961,590
150,145
149,747
Warrants - Note 8
111
Options - Note 9
1,694
1,538
Contributed surplus
124
108
Deficit
(125,568
)
(123,160
Total shareholders equity
26,506
28,344
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
Nature of operations and going concern - Note 2
Commitments and contingencies - Note 10
Subsequent events - Note 14
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS - UNAUDITED
Cumulative
during
Three Months Ended June 30,
Six Months Ended June 30,
Exploration
(U.S. dollars in thousands, except share data)
2005
2004
Stage
Costs and expenses:
Exploration, property evaluation and holding costs
461
465
919
949
4,258
Corporate administration and investor relations
906
806
1,346
1,329
6,320
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
61
52
113
104
606
Provision for reclamation and closure costs
1,048
Cost recoveries related to USF&G lawsuit
(240
Interest (income)/expense
(63
(5
(120
(22
(226
(Gain)/Loss on disposal of assets
(1
(7
(8
(98
Other (income)/expense
1
(44
(64
Stock-based compensation
90
76
173
232
1,245
(Gain)/Loss on currency translation
(3
44
(Gain)/Loss on disposal of marketable securities
(16
(160
Write-down of marketable securities
118
Total costs and expenses
1,450
1,391
2,408
2,537
12,851
Net loss
(1,450
(1,391
(2,408
(2,537
(12,851
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
15,383,662
18,170,682
15,015,732
Basic and diluted loss per share
(0.08
(0.09
(0.13
(0.17
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF DEFICIT - UNAUDITED
Deficit, beginning of period, as previously reported
(124,118
(119,382
(117,265
(971
Deficit, beginning of period, as restated
(118,236
Deficit, end of period
(120,773
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - UNAUDITED
Cash flows from operating activities:
Loss for the period
(12,852
Adjustments to reconcile loss for the period to cash provided by / (used in) operations:
Amortization of reclamatation costs
30
60
179
Reclamation and closure costs accrued, net
9
11
10
Stock based compensation
1,246
(Gain)/Loss on sale of marketable securities
Other non-cash items
120
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
6
287
122
Supplies inventory and prepaid expenses
55
(4
(37
5
(161
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
45
12
(1,007
Net cash used in operating activities
(1,127
(1,207
(1,819
(1,655
(11,025
Cash flows from investing activities:
(67
(2,288
(5,028
Acquisition of marketable securities
(20
(11
(26
(113
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
36
51
319
Additions to mineral properties, net
(324
(55
(575
(168
(4,590
Acquisition of subsidiary net of cash acquired
(1,613
Additions to plant and equipment
(10
(14
(33
(1,780
Proceeds on disposal of fixed assets and supplies
264
Net cash used in investing activities
(1,964
(70
(2,228
(2,507
(12,542
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net proceeds from private placements
14,679
Proceeds from exercise of warrants - Note 7
853
373
3,039
9,348
Proceeds from exercise of stock options - Note 7
25
17
1,132
Net cash provided by financing activities
398
3,056
25,159
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
(3,091
(424
(3,649
(1,106
1,593
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
5,358
4,838
5,520
674
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
4,414
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSUNAUDITED
(U.S. dollars unless specified otherwise)
1. General
The consolidated interim financial statements of Vista Gold Corp. (an Exploration Stage Enterprise) (the Corporation), as of June 30, 2005, and for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005, have been prepared by the Corporation without audit and do not include all of the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in Canada for annual financial statements. As described in Note 12, generally accepted accounting principles in Canada differ in certain material respects from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. In the opinion of management, all of the adjustments necessary to fairly present the interim financial information set forth herein have been made. These adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results of a full year or of future years. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related footnotes included in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto filed with the Commission on August 12, 2005.
2. Nature of operations and going concern
(a) Nature of operations
The Corporation evaluates, acquires and explores gold exploration and potential development projects. As such, the Corporation is considered an Exploration Stage Enterprise. The Corporations approach to acquisitions of gold projects has generally been to seek projects within political jurisdictions with well established mining, land ownership and tax laws, which have adequate drilling and geological data to support the completion of a third-party review of the geological data and to complete an estimate of the gold mineralization. In addition, the Corporation looks for opportunities to improve the value of its gold projects through exploration drilling, and/or reengineering the operating assumptions underlying previous engineering work.
Gold production has gradually declined since mining activities were suspended at the Hycroft mine in 1998. Effective January 1, 2002, gold production is considered incidental and the Corporation stopped reporting the associated sales proceeds as revenue. Based on that, management of the Corporation decided during 2003 that the Corporation was an exploration-stage enterprise. For financial reporting purposes, commencing with the Corporations audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003, the Corporation was characterized as an exploration-stage enterprise and its consolidated statements of loss, deficit and cash flows include columns showing cumulative amounts during the exploration stage (i.e., from January 1, 2002, the effective date when gold production was considered incidental).
Although the Corporation has reviewed and is satisfied with the title for all mineral properties in which it has a material interest, there is no guarantee that title to such concessions will not be challenged or impugned.
(b) Going concern
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Corporation will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. At June 30, 2005, the Corporation holds working capital of $2.7 million which is not sufficient to satisfy current general and administrative activities, Hycroft holding costs and property obligations which will be approximately $3.2 million over the next twelve months. Therefore, there is substantial doubt about the Corporations ability to continue as a going concern.
The Corporation is investigating the possibility of raising additional capital through private placements and, although management has been successful in the past, there can be no assurance that it will be able to raise additional capital in the future. The Corporation continues to actively pursue alternatives to monetize its assets and attract other investors.
The ability of the Corporation to continue as a going concern and to realize the carrying values of its assets and discharge its liabilities and obligations when due is dependent upon the successful completion of the planned actions or other alternatives noted above. Management believes successful completion of raising additional capital will mitigate the adverse conditions and events which raise doubt about the validity of the going concern assumption used in preparing these financial statements. These financial statements do not give effect to any adjustments, which may be necessary should the Corporation be unable to continue as a going concern and such adjustments may be material.
3. Restricted cash
The Corporation has pledged cash as collateral totalling $5.0 million to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Nevada State Office, to cover increased reclamation cost estimates at the Hycroft mine (Note 10).
4. Acquisition of PT Masmindo Dwi (Awak Mas Project)
On May 27, 2005, the Corporation completed its acquisition of the Awak Mas gold deposit in Sulawesi, Indonesia, pursuant to the exercise of its option to purchase the deposit for a purchase price of $1.5 million, as previously reported. Under the terms of the option agreement, the Corporation had a six-month option period in which to conduct due diligence while paying the owners $15,000 per month. The monthly option payments, as well as costs of up to $150,000 expended to correct any deficiencies in asset standing, were to be credited towards the purchase price. On May 12, 2005, the Corporation transferred $1.2 million to an escrow account. These funds were released to the ultimate vendors of the Awak Mas deposit, Weston and ORT (as defined below), upon completion of the final transaction documents. The amount of $1.2 million represented the $1.5 million purchase price less: the $150,000 deposit previously paid by the Corporation (which included $75,000 in aggregate option payments made by the Corporation); and $150,000 expended by the Corporation to correct deficiencies in asset standing.
The acquisition of the Awak Mas Project involved the Corporations purchase, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Vista Gold (Barbados) Corp. (Vista Barbados), of all of the outstanding shares of Salu Siwa Pty Ltd, an Australian company (Salu Siwa) from the two owners of Salu Siwa: Weston Investments Pty Ltd., an Australian company (Weston) and Organic Resource Technology Limited, an Australian company (ORT). Weston and ORT respectively owned 66% and 34% of the outstanding Salu Siwa shares. Salu Siwa in turn owns 99% of the outstanding shares of PT Masmindo Dwi, an Indonesian company (PT Masmindo), which is the direct holder of the Awak Mas Project. The remaining 1% of the outstanding PT Masmindo shares is held by ORT. Transfer of this remaining 1% to Vista Barbados is subject to any approvals, consents or other statutory requirements of the Indonesian authorities that will be required to effect the completion of such share purchase.
Also in connection with this acquisition, certain creditors of PT Masmindo agreed to assign to Vista Gold Corp. (parent) an aggregate of $857,973 of notes payable owed by PT Masmindo to the creditors, as follows: ORT Limited (of Australia) (previously known as Masmindo Mining Corp.) - $612,555.75; PT Masmindo Eka Sakti (of Indonesia) - $217,469.08; and Continental Goldfields Limited (of Western Australia) - $27,948.00.
This acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method and results of operations have been consolidated since the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation based on preliminary estimates of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed; appraisals and valuations are being conducted and final allocation will be made upon completion.
Purchase price:
Cash
1,500,000
Acquisition costs
112,976
1,612,976
Assets acquired:
1,979
80,389
Plant and equipment, net
27,456
Mineral properties
1,529,797
1,639,621
Liabilities assumed:
26,645
Net Assets Acquired
7
As of June 30, 2005, the consolidated capitalized mineral property costs for the Awak Mas Project (Note 5) were $1,529,797.
5 Mineral properties
June 30,
December 31,
Acquisition
Option
Exploration &
Year to date
Ending
($ 000s)
net balance
costs
payments
land costs
Cost recovery
activity
Balance
Maverick Springs, United States
1,143
48
(47
1,144
Mountain View, United States
751
35
786
Long Valley, United States
305
100
405
Wildcat, United States
981
Hasbrouck and Three Hills, United States
364
Yellow Pine, United States
293
294
Paredones Amarillos, Mexico
2,576
353
2,929
Guadalupe de los Reyes, Mexico
1,021
1,026
Amayapampa, Bolivia
10,561
85
10,646
Awak Mas, Indonesia
1,530
Other
114
109
1,625
110
417
2,105
The recoverability of the carrying values of the Corporations mineral properties is dependent upon the successful start-up and commercial production from, or sale, or lease, of these properties and upon economic reserves being discovered or developed on the properties. Development and/or start-up of any of these projects will depend, among other things, on managements ability to raise additional capital for these purposes. Although the Corporation has been successful in raising such capital in the past, there can be no assurance that it will be able to do so in the future.
6. Plant and equipment
Accumulated
Depreciation and
Cost
Write-downs
Net
Hycroft mine, United States
11,965
10,698
1,266
12,031
10,720
1,311
Corporate, United States
435
377
58
388
348
12,400
11,075
12,419
11,068
Measurement Uncertainty
The Corporation believes that the fair value of its mineral properties exceeds the carrying value, however, a write-down in the carrying values of the Corporations properties may be required as a result of independent evaluation of gold resources and application of a ceiling test which is based on estimates of gold resources and gold prices.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared using the going concern basis (note 2). In the event that the Corporation does not continue as a going concern, then the net book value of the property, plant and equipment and mineral properties may not be recoverable. In addition, in these circumstances the valuation of certain other recorded assets and liabilities could also be materially different.
7. Capital stock
Common Shares issued and outstanding
Number of
shares issued
Capital stock
As of December 31, 2004
17,961,590
Warrants exercised, for cash - Note 7
248,574
Stock options exercised, for cash - Note 8
7,858
Issued during the three months ended March 31, 2005
256,432
Warrants exercised, for cash
Stock options exercised, for cash
Issued during the three months ended June 30, 2005
As of June 30, 2005
8. Warrants
Warrants granted, exercised and outstanding during the period are summarized in the following table:
Weighted
average
Warrants
exercise
remaining
granted(1)
Valuation
exercised
expired
outstanding
prices (U.S. $)
Expiry date
life (yrs)
(000s)
8,990,135
(3,775,919
(197,740
5,016,477
3.28
Private placement February-March 2002
(248,574
1.50
Feb - Mar-07
2.0
(4,024,493
4,767,903
3.37
(1) Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share.
9. Options to purchase Common Shares
The total number of options outstanding at the end of the quarter is 875,625 with exercise prices ranging from approximately $3.86 to $4.76 and remaining lives of 0.2 to 6.7 years. The total number of options outstanding represents 5.0% of issued capital.
There were 10,000 stock options issued by the Corporation during the quarter ended June 30, 2005. Compensation expense of $172,651 was recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2005, for options previously granted and vesting over time.
Shares
Value
Outstanding - December 31, 2004
883,483
Granted
Exercised
(7,858
Vested, Fair Value
75
Outstanding - March 31, 2005
875,625
1,613
10,000
Cancel
(10,000
73
Outstanding - June 30, 2005
The fair value of stock options granted to employees and directors was estimated at the grant date based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using the following weighted average assumptions:
June 2005
June 2004
Expected volatility
80.0
%
Risk-free interest rate
3.99
2.74
Expected lives (years)
Dividend yield
0
Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected price volatility. Changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, and therefore, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable measure of the fair value of the Corporations stock options.
10. Commitments and contingencies
The U. S. Bureau of Land Management, Nevada State Office (BLM) has required the Corporation to provide a total surety amount of $6.8 million for the approved Hycroft mine reclamation plan. The Corporation has pledged cash as collateral totaling $5.0 million to the BLM (Note 3).
The Corporation estimates that the related asset retirement expenditures will commence approximately five years after the start-up of the Hycroft mine (an event not scheduled) and continue for several years after that time. Using a credit-adjusted rate of 7.75%, the fair value of the estimated $6.8 million obligation is $4.2 million, as accrued in these financial statements.
11. Geographic and segment information
The Corporation evaluates, acquires and explores gold exploration and potential development projects. These activities are focused principally in North America and South America. On April 15, 2005 the Corporations Board of Directors approved the Corporations exercise of its purchase option for the Awak Mas gold deposit located in Sulawesi, Indonesia. which was finalized on May 27, 2005. Substantially all related costs are incurred in the United States. The Corporation reported no revenues in the three-month or six-month periods ended June 30, 2005, or for the same periods in 2004. Geographic segmentation of capital assets is provided in Notes 5 and 6.
12. Differences between Canadian and United States generally accepted accounting principles
The Corporation prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada, which differ in some respects from those in the United States. The significant differences between generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in Canada and in the United States, as they relate to these financial statements, are as follows:
(a) In accordance with U.S. GAAP, exploration, mineral property evaluation, holding costs, option payments and related acquisition costs for mineral properties acquired under an option agreement are expensed as incurred. When proven and probable reserves are determined for a property and a bankable feasibility study is completed, then subsequent exploration and development costs on the property would be capitalized. Total capitalized cost of such properties is measured periodically for recoverability of carrying value under SFAS No. 144.
(b) In accordance with U.S. GAAP, items such as marketable securities are to be measured at fair value at the balance sheet date and related unrealized gains and losses are required to be shown separately in the derivation of comprehensive income.
(c) Under Canadian corporate law, the Corporation underwent a capital reduction in connection with the amalgamation of Granges, Inc. (Granges) and Hycroft Resources & Development, Inc. whereby share capital and contributed surplus were reduced to eliminate the consolidated accumulated deficit of Granges as of December 31, 1994, after giving effect to the estimated costs of amalgamation. Under U.S. corporate law, no such transaction is available and accordingly is not allowed under U.S. GAAP.
(d) In accordance with U.S. GAAP, only those options granted to non-employees of the Corporation are recorded for financial statement purposes using the fair value on the date of grant.
The significant differences in the consolidated statements of loss relative to U.S. GAAP were:
Net loss Canadian GAAP
Realized loss on marketable securities
(85
Unrealized gain/(loss) on marketable securities
Exploration, property evaluation and holding costs (a)
(101
(234
(2,875
Financing costs
(222
Stock-based compensation expense (d)
904
Beneficial conversion feature
(2,774
Net loss U.S. GAAP
(1,684
(1,492
(2,810
(2,771
(17,819
Unrealized gain/(loss) on marketable securities (b)
(43
(35
(52
(87
22
Comprehensive loss U.S. GAAP
(1,727
(1,527
(2,862
(2,858
(17,797
Basic and diluted loss per share U.S. GAAP
(0.10
(0.15
(0.19
The significant differences in the consolidated statements of cash flows relative to U.S. GAAP were:
Adjustments to reconcile loss for the period to cash used in operations:
Non-cash items
177
137
327
339
2,873
Additions to mineral properties, net (a)
146
47
262
543
(1,045
(1,451
(1,308
(2,394
(1,888
(13,899
(12,541
324
101
575
234
2,875
(1,640
31
(1,653
(2,273
(9,666
The significant differences in the consolidated balance sheets as at June 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, relative to U.S. GAAP were:
Per Cdn.
Cdn./U.S.
Per U.S.
(U.S. $ 000s)
GAAP
Adj.
Current assets (b)
3,015
74
6,900
Restricted cash
Property, plant and equipment (a)
(10,662
12,357
(10,087
10,914
(10,640
20,400
(10,013
22,775
Long term liabilities
4,232
Capital stock (c)
76,262
226,407
226,009
Special warrants
222
Warrants and options (d)
1,805
(1,335
470
1,649
(1,169
480
Contributed surplus (c)
5,553
5,677
5,560
5,668
Other comprehensive income (loss) (b)
Deficit (a,b,c,d)
(91,364
(216,932
(90,962
(214,122
15,866
18,331
Total liabilities & shareholders equity
13. Related party transactions
Maverick Springs
In June 2003, the Corporation formalized an agreement to grant to Silver Standard Resources Inc. (SSRI) an option to acquire the Corporations interest in the silver mineralized material hosted in the Maverick Springs project in Nevada. The Corporation and SSRI have a common director. Under the terms of the agreement, the Corporation will retain its 100% interest in the gold mineralized material, and SSRI would pay the Corporation $1.5 million over four years including a cash payment of $300,000 which was paid at closing. The remaining $1.2 million would be used to fund exploration programs, land holding costs and option payments on the Maverick Springs project. As of June 30, 2005, the Corporation has received payments from SSRI aggregating $1,388,775 and included in current assets is a receivable amount due from SSRI in the amount of $37,982 to reimburse the Corporation for exploration expenditures incurred on the Maverick Springs project.
14. Subsequent events
Amendments to Agreement to Sell Amayapampa
On July 18, 2005, the Corporation agreed with Luzon Minerals Ltd. (Luzon), subject to regulatory approval, to further amend the terms of the original purchase option agreement between the companies concerning the Corporations Amayapampa gold project in Bolivia with respect to the payments previously due on June 15, 2005 and June 15, 2006. The agreement had been most recently amended in January 2005, in connection with Luzons decision to exercise its option to purchase the Amayapampa project from the Corporation, as previously reported. The amendment calls for an aggregate purchase price comprising: $2,700,000 (including $100,000 previously paid); either 3,250,000 or 4,250,000 common shares in the capital of Luzon (including 250,000 already issued to the Corporation), and 1,000,000 common share purchase warrants; and a net smelter return royalty to the Corporation, payable as follows:
Within five days of receiving approval of the TSX Venture Exchange, Luzon will issue to the Corporation 3,000,000 Luzon common shares and 1,000,000 warrants, each warrant entitling the holder to acquire one common share of Luzon at an exercise price of CDN $0.20 for a period of three years from the date of issuance, and, on the earlier of December 31, 2005 or the date of the closing of the next debt,
equity or other financing completed by Luzon after July 15, 2005, Luzon will pay to the Corporation $100,000 in cash.
Within five days of the date that is the earlier of December 31, 2006 or the date Luzon completes or obtains financing sufficient to commence construction at the Amayapampa project, Luzon will pay to the Corporation $2,500,000.
In the event that Luzon completes a feasibility study or technical report for the Amayapampa project that discloses recovered gold of more than 400,000 ounces, Luzon shall issue to the Corporation an additional 1,000,000 common shares.
If Luzon completes the acquisition of the Amayapampa project, Luzon will grant the Corporation a net smelter return royalty as follows: (i) on the first 440,000 ounces of gold production, a 4.5% net smelter return royalty where the gold price is less than $450 per ounce and a 5.5% net smelter return royalty where the gold price is $450 per ounce or more, and (ii) thereafter, a 1.0% net smelter return royalty.
In addition, effective from July 29, 2004, Luzon will pay all costs associated with holding and maintaining the Amayapampa project, including reimbursement of outlays made by the Corporation (approximately $51,000, as of June 30, 2005). Other terms of the agreement remain unchanged.
Hycroft Mine Canyon Resources Elects Not to Exercise Purchase Option
On August 4, 2005, the Corporation announced that Canyon Resources Corporation had advised the Corporation that Canyon will not be exercising its option to acquire the Hycroft mine near Winnemucca, Nevada. As previously reported, in January 2005, Canyon entered into a six month option agreement with the Corporation to expend $0.5 million for drilling, engineering and due-diligence review to acquire the mine for $4.0 million in cash plus $6.0 million in Canyon equity units consisting of one common share and one warrant for half a share.
Canyon completed a 33-hole drilling program totaling 12,475 feet and undertook a comprehensive study to restart operations at Hycroft. The drilling program confirmed average grades for the ore body but Canyon noted that increased costs, as well as shortages of labor and large mining equipment were contributing factors in its decision not to proceed.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(U.S. dollars in thousands, unless specified otherwise)
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation for the three years ended December 31, 2004 and the related notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in Canada. Reference should be made to Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements should be made for a discussion of differences between Canadian and United States GAAP and their effect on the financial statements. All amounts stated herein are in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted.
Results from Operations
The Corporations consolidated net loss for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, was $1.5 million or $0.08 per share compared to a consolidated net loss of $1.4 million or $0.09 per share for the same period in 2004. The Corporations consolidated net loss for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 was $2.4 million or $0.13 per share compared to a consolidated net loss of $2.5 million or $0.17 per share for the same period in 2004. The net losses for the three-month and six-month periods were minimally different from those for the prior-year periods, primarily reflecting slightly decreased exploration, property evaluation and holding costs, and increased corporate administration and investor relations costs of $0.1 million for the three-month period due to a mass mailing marketing campaign, with slightly decreased costs for the six-month period.
Exploration, property and holding costs
Exploration, property and holding costs increased to $461,000 during the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, compared to $465,000 for the same period in 2004. Exploration, property and holding costs decreased to
13
$919,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, compared to $949,000 for the same period in 2004. The decrease of $4,000 for the three-month period is the result of option payments of $60,000 for evaluation of properties, offset by decreased holding costs at the Hycroft mine. For the six months, the decrease of Hycroft holding costs offset increased property evaluation costs, resulting in minimal overall change from the prior year period of $ 30,000.
Corporate administration and investor relations costs increased to $906,000 during the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, compared to $806,000 for the same period in 2004. Corporate administration and investor relations costs increased slightly to $1,346,000 during the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to $1,329,000 for the same period in 2004. The increase of $100,000 for the three-month period is primarily the result of a mass mailing marketing campaign for investor relations.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased to $61,000 during the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, compared to $52,000 for the same period in 2004. Depreciation, depletion and amortization increased to $113,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, compared to $104,000 for the same period in 2004. The increase of $9,000 is attributed to the increase of amortization for computer equipment acquired for the office in 2004.
Stock-based compensation increased to $90,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, compared to $76,000 for the same period in 2004. Stock-based compensation was $173,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, compared to $232,000 for the same period in 2004. The slight increase in stock-based compensation in the second quarter of 2005 is the result of recognized expense for the vesting of options that had been granted to employees in 2004, subject to shareholder approval of increased stock option plan grant limits, which approval was obtained at the Corporations Annual General Meeting of shareholders in May 2005. The Corporation granted no stock options in the first quarter of 2005, which accounted for the decline in stock-based compensation expense for the first six months of 2005 compared with the prior period in 2004.
Other income and expense
In aggregate, other income and expense items, including interest income, gain on the disposal of assets and other income, resulted in a net gain of $63,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, as compared to a net gain of $5,000 in the same period in 2004. In aggregate, other income and expense items, including interest income, gain on the disposal of assets and other income, resulted in a net gain of $127,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, compared to a net gain of $74,000 for the same period in 2004. The increase of $58,000 for the three-month period an increase of $53,000 for the six-month period can be attributed primarily to higher interest income in each period, offset by a $44,000 decrease in other income for the six-month period.
For the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005, gains on disposal of marketable securities, were $5,000 and $16,000, respectively. No gains on disposal, or write downs, were recorded for the same periods in 2004.
Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash used in operations
Cash used in operations was $1,127,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, compared to $1,207,000 for the same period in 2004. Cash used in operations was $1,819,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, compared to $1,655,000 for the same period in 2004. The decrease of $80,000 for the three-month period can be attributed to a reduction in prepaid expenses and accounts payable and accruals of $99,000 for the same period in 2004. The increase of $164,000 for the six-month period was attributable to the reduction of accounts receivable of $256,000 for the same period in 2004.
14
Investing activities
Net cash used for investing activities increased to $1,964,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, compared to $70,000 for the same period in 2004. The increase of $1,894,000 in 2005 was due to the purchase of the Awak Mas Project in May 2005 for $1.5 million and exploration activities in Paredones Amarillos of $0.4 million. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, net cash used for investing activities decreased by $279,000 to $2,228,000 compared to $2,507,000 for the same period in 2004. Overall expenditures were higher during the 2004 period, primarily reflecting the restricted cash payment of $2.3 million made by the Corporation in the first quarter of 2004, in connection with bonding requirements for the Hycroft mine.
Financing activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $0 in the three-month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to $853,000 for the same period in 2004, all of which was attributable to the exercise of warrants. Net cash provided by financing activities was $398,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to $3,056,000 for the same period in 2004. The amounts raised in the 2005 six-month period were from the exercise of warrants in the amount of $373,000 and stock options in the amount of $25,000, all during the first quarter. The aggregate $3,056,000 proceeds in the 2004 six-month period were from the exercise of warrants in the amount of $3,039,000 and stock options in the amount of $17,000.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2005, the Corporations total assets were $31.0 million compared to $32.8 million at December 31, 2004, representing a decrease of $1.8 million. At June 30, 2005, the Corporation had working capital of $2.7 million compared to $6.6 million at December 31, 2004, representing a decrease of $3.9 million. This decrease is primarily attributed to the net loss of $1.4 million, the decrease in accounts receivable of $0.3 million, increase in exploration activities of $0.7 million and the purchase of the Awak Mas Project for $1.5 million.
The principal component of working capital at both June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, is cash and cash equivalents of $2.3 million and $5.9 million, respectively. At June 30, 2005, the Corporation had no outstanding debt to banks or financial institutions.
Major cash commitments for the remainder of 2005 are related to corporate administration and operations of approximately $1.3 million, and property options and expenditure commitments of approximately $0.4 million. For the first six months of 2005, the Corporations cash expenditures aggregated $3.6 million, including $1.5 million for the purchase of the Awak Mas project in May 2005 (see Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements).
Subsequent Events
Within five days of receiving approval of the TSX Venture Exchange, Luzon will issue to the Corporation 3,000,000 Luzon common shares and 1,000,000 warrants, each warrant entitling the holder to acquire one common share of Luzon at an exercise price of CDN $0.20 for a period of three years from the date of issuance, and, on the earlier of December 31, 2005 or the date of the closing of the next debt, equity or other financing completed by Luzon after July 15, 2005, Luzon will pay to the Corporation $100,000 in cash.
15
Hycroft Mine Canyon Resources Elects Not to Exercise Purchase Option
Canyon completed a 33-hole drilling program totaling 12,475 feet and undertook a comprehensive study to restart operations at Hycroft. Assaying was done by American Assay Laboratories of Sparks, Nevada. The drilling program confirmed average grades for the ore body but Canyon noted that increased costs, as well as shortages of labor and large mining equipment were contributing factors in its decision not to proceed. The Corporation received the data from Canyons work at the time of notification and has not completed a review of all the information as of the date of this Form 10-Q. However, a resource study in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 guidelines was completed by Ore Reserves Engineering of Lakewood, Colorado, under the direction of Mr. Alan Noble, P. Eng., a qualified person independent of Canyon or the Corporation.
The re-estimation of gold resources was based on 587 drill holes with a total of 52,889 assay intervals covering 267,280 feet. A comparison of the study results with the previous estimates by Mine Development Associates of Reno, Nevada, as announced by the Corporation in September 2004, is shown in the following table.
Brimstone Gold Resources(0.005 opt cyanide-soluble gold cutoff grade)
Mine DevelopmentAssociates 2004
Ore Reserves Engineering2005
ResourceCategory
Short Tons
Fire AssayGold Grade
(millions)
(opt)
Measured (1)
23.3
0.0165
17.2
0.020
Indicated (1)
24.2
0.0153
35.5
0.018
Total M&I
47.5
0.0159
52.7
0.019
Inferred (2)
12.0
0.0111
8.7
0.015
1) Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Measured and Indicated Resources: This table uses the terms measuredand indicated resources. The Corporation advises U.S. investors that while these terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into reserves.
16
2) Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors concerning estimates of Inferred Resources: This table uses the term inferred resources. The Corporation advises U.S. investors that while this term is recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize it. Inferred resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or prefeasibility studies, except in rare cases. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of an inferred resource exists or is economically or legally mineable.
Uncertainty of Forward-Looking Statements
This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are intended to be covered by the safe harbor created by such sections. Such statements are typically punctuated by words or phrases such as anticipates, estimates, projects, foresees, management believes, believes and words or phrases of similar import. These forward-looking statements concern, among other things, the Corporations financial and operating results and estimates, and business prospects, and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties or assumptions. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. Such risks include, but are not limited to, risks relating to uncertainty of results of acquisition, exploration and development activities; gold price volatility; effects on the Corporations operations of current and prospective governmental regulations; and risks associated with international business operations. For a more detailed discussion of such risks and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements please see the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, under Part I Item 1. Business Risk Factors. That section of that Form 10-K is incorporated in this filing and investors should refer to it. Vista Gold assumes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in other factors affecting such statements.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Corporation is engaged in the acquisition of gold projects and related activities including exploration engineering, permitting and the preparation of feasibility studies. The value of the Corporations properties is related to gold price and changes in the price of gold could affect the Corporations ability to generate revenue from its portfolio of gold projects.
Gold prices may fluctuate widely from time to time and are affected by numerous factors, including the following: expectations with respect to the rate of inflation, exchange rates, interest rates, global and regional political and economic circumstances and governmental policies, including those with respect to gold holdings by central banks. The gold price fell to a 20-year low of $253 in July 1999 and recovered significantly since that time to reach a level of $436 by December 31, 2004 and was $437 at June 30, 2005. The demand for, and supply of, gold affect gold prices, but not necessarily in the same manner as demand and supply affect the prices of other commodities. The supply of gold consists of a combination of new mine production and existing stocks of bullion and fabricated gold held by governments, public and private financial institutions, industrial organizations and private individuals. The demand for gold primarily consists of jewelry and investments. Additionally, hedging activities by producers, consumers, financial institutions and individuals can affect gold supply and demand. While gold can be readily sold on numerous markets throughout the world, its market value cannot be predicted for any particular time.
Because the Corporation has several exploration operations in North and South America and is about to start exploration in Indonesia, it is subject to foreign currency fluctuations. The Corporation does not engage in currency hedging to offset any risk of currency fluctuations as insignificant monetary amounts are held for immaterial land holding costs related to the properties owned.
The Corporation has no debt outstanding, nor does it have any investment in debt instruments other than highly liquid short-term investments. Accordingly, the Corporation considers its interest rate risk exposure to be insignificant at this time.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of June 30, 2005. Based on the evaluation, the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures in place are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation, including consolidated subsidiaries, in reports that the Corporation files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis in accordance with applicable time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. There has been no change in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2005, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
18
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Please see Part I Item 3. Legal Proceedings as included in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, for information about a legal dispute initiated in Bolivia in April 1998 by a Mr. Estanislao Radic who brought legal proceedings in the lower penal court against Mr. Raul Garafulic and the Corporation, questioning the validity of Mr. Garafulics ownership of the Amayapampa property. The Corporation does not anticipate that this dispute will result in any material adverse impact on the Corporation or the value of its holdings in Bolivia; however, in the interest of full disclosure, this matter is reported herein.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At the Annual General Shareholders Meeting of the Corporation held on May 9, 2005, the following matters were submitted to a vote of the shareholders.
(i) Directors elected to the Corporations Board of Directors for a one-year term, together with respective votes were: John M. Clark - 6,980,683 votes for, 258,998 votes abstained and withheld; W. Durand Eppler - 6,980,628 votes for, 259,053 votes abstained and withheld; C. Thomas Ogryzlo - 6,980,683 votes for, 258,998 votes abstained and withheld; Robert A. Quartermain - 6,980,678 votes for, 259,003 votes abstained and withheld; and Michael B. Richings - 6,980,683 votes for, 258,998 votes abstained and withheld.
(ii) Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as auditor to hold office until the next annual general meeting. The motion was approved with 7,196,491 votes for, 25,815 votes against, and 17,375 votes abstained and withheld.
(iii) Amendment to the Corporations Stock Option Plan to increase the maximum number of common shares which may be issued under this plan from 1,000,000 to 1,750,000. The motion was approved with 6,479,310 votes for, 662,240 votes against, and 98,131 votes abstained and withheld.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
(a)
Exhibits
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
19
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
(Registrant)
Date:
August 12, 2005
By:
/s/ Michael B. Richings
Michael B. Richings
President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Gregory G. Marlier
Gregory G. Marlier
Chief Financial Officer
20