Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
☒
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2023
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-35000
Walker & Dunlop, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland
80-0629925
(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
7272 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1300
Bethesda, Maryland 20814
(301) 215-5500
(Address of principal executive offices and registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Trading Symbol
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share
WD
New York Stock Exchange
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer ☒
Smaller Reporting Company ☐
Accelerated Filer ☐
Emerging Growth Company ☐
Non-accelerated Filer ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
As of July 26, 2023, there were 33,344,682 total shares of common stock outstanding.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc.Form 10-QINDEX
Page
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
3
Item 1.
Financial Statements
Item 2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
31
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
65
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
66
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Legal Proceedings
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
67
Mine Safety Disclosures
Item 5.
Other Information
Item 6.
Exhibits
Signatures
69
Item 1. Financial Statements
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2023
December 31, 2022
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
$
228,091
225,949
Restricted cash
21,769
17,676
Pledged securities, at fair value
170,666
157,282
Loans held for sale, at fair value
1,303,686
396,344
Mortgage servicing rights
932,131
975,226
Goodwill
963,710
959,712
Other intangible assets
189,919
198,643
Receivables, net
242,397
202,251
Committed investments in tax credit equity
165,136
254,154
Other assets
589,919
658,122
Total assets
4,807,424
4,045,359
Liabilities
Warehouse notes payable
1,342,187
537,531
Notes payable
775,995
704,103
Allowance for risk-sharing obligations
32,410
44,057
Commitments to fund investments in tax credit equity
156,617
239,281
Other liabilities
775,718
803,558
Total liabilities
3,082,927
2,328,530
Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock (authorized 50,000 shares; none issued)
—
Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized 200,000 shares; issued and outstanding 32,703 shares at June 30, 2023 and 32,396 shares at December 31, 2022)
327
323
Additional paid-in capital ("APIC")
412,182
412,636
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI")
(1,465)
(1,568)
Retained earnings
1,287,334
1,278,035
Total stockholders’ equity
1,698,378
1,689,426
Noncontrolling interests
26,119
27,403
Total equity
1,724,497
1,716,829
Commitments and contingencies (NOTES 2 and 9)
Total liabilities and equity
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
For the three months ended
For the six months ended
June 30,
2023
2022
Revenues
Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net
64,968
102,605
112,052
184,915
Fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net
42,058
51,949
72,071
104,679
Servicing fees
77,061
74,260
152,827
146,941
Property sales broker fees
10,345
46,386
21,969
69,784
Investment management fees
16,309
16,186
31,482
31,044
Net warehouse interest income
(1,526)
5,268
(1,525)
10,041
Escrow earnings and other interest income
35,386
6,751
66,310
8,554
Other revenues
28,014
37,443
56,175
104,334
Total revenues
272,615
340,848
511,361
660,292
Expenses
Personnel
133,305
168,368
251,918
312,549
Amortization and depreciation
56,292
61,103
113,258
117,255
Provision (benefit) for credit losses
(734)
(4,840)
(11,509)
(14,338)
Interest expense on corporate debt
17,010
6,412
32,284
12,817
Other operating expenses
30,730
36,195
54,793
68,409
Total expenses
236,603
267,238
440,744
496,692
Income from operations
36,012
73,610
70,617
163,600
Income tax expense
10,491
19,503
17,626
38,963
Net income before noncontrolling interests
25,521
54,107
52,991
124,637
Less: net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests
(2,114)
(179)
(1,309)
(858)
Walker & Dunlop net income
27,635
54,286
54,300
125,495
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on pledged available-for-sale securities, net of taxes
156
(1,810)
103
(2,780)
Walker & Dunlop comprehensive income
27,791
52,476
54,403
122,715
Basic earnings per share (NOTE 10)
0.82
1.63
1.62
3.77
Diluted earnings per share (NOTE 10)
1.61
3.73
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
32,695
32,388
32,612
32,304
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
32,851
32,694
32,834
32,657
4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023
Common Stock
Retained
Noncontrolling
Total
Shares
Amount
APIC
AOCI
Earnings
Interests
Equity
Balance at December 31, 2022
32,396
26,665
Net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests
805
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
(53)
Stock-based compensation - equity classified
6,664
Issuance of common stock in connection with equity compensation plans
468
5
3,397
3,402
Repurchase and retirement of common stock
(185)
(1)
(17,394)
(17,395)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders
(600)
Cash dividends paid ($0.63 per common share)
(21,221)
Other activity
(2,360)
2,360
Balance at March 31, 2023
32,679
405,303
(1,621)
1,281,119
29,968
1,715,096
7,541
33
(9)
(662)
(1,735)
(21,180)
(240)
Balance at June 30, 2023
32,703
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (CONTINUED)
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022
Balance at December 31, 2021
32,049
320
393,022
2,558
1,154,252
28,055
1,578,207
71,209
(679)
(970)
10,812
544
15,526
15,531
(195)
(27,048)
(27,049)
Cash dividends paid ($0.60 per common share)
(20,077)
Other activity (NOTE 10)
(5,303)
15,490
10,187
Balance at March 31, 2022
32,398
324
387,009
1,588
1,205,384
42,866
1,637,171
9,980
43
110
(119)
(2,409)
(9,892)
(12,302)
(1,675)
(20,066)
8,978
(8,718)
260
Balance at June 30, 2022
32,322
403,668
(222)
1,229,712
32,294
1,665,775
6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
For the six months ended June 30,
Cash flows from operating activities
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Gains attributable to the fair value of future servicing rights, net of guaranty obligation
(72,071)
(104,679)
Change in the fair value of premiums and origination fees
1,812
7,852
Gain from revaluation of previously held equity-method investment
(39,641)
Originations of loans held for sale
(5,406,027)
(8,805,659)
Proceeds from transfers of loans held for sale
4,504,278
9,637,859
Other operating activities, net
(63,763)
(69,417)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
(881,031)
853,869
Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures
(9,501)
(11,902)
Purchases of equity-method investments
(15,231)
(12,029)
Purchases of pledged available-for-sale ("AFS") securities
(46,395)
Proceeds from prepayment and sale of pledged AFS securities
4,807
6,101
Investments in joint ventures
(5,040)
Distributions from joint ventures
1,524
11,359
Acquisitions, net of cash received
(78,465)
Originations of loans held for investment
(243)
(49,057)
Principal collected on loans held for investment
129,260
71,500
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
110,616
(113,928)
Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings (repayments) of warehouse notes payable, net
902,144
(826,454)
Borrowings of interim warehouse notes payable
36,459
Repayments of interim warehouse notes payable
(91,586)
(26,000)
Repayments of notes payable
(118,046)
(21,244)
Borrowings of notes payable
196,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
449
263
Repurchase of common stock
(18,057)
(39,380)
Cash dividends paid
(42,401)
(40,143)
Payment of contingent consideration
(25,690)
(17,612)
(2,335)
Debt issuance costs
(4,454)
(1,573)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
796,024
(937,359)
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents (NOTE 2)
25,609
(197,418)
Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents at beginning of period
258,283
393,180
Total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents at end of period
283,892
195,762
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid to third parties for interest
52,147
28,023
Cash paid for income taxes
20,807
45,300
7
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (CONTINUED)
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Activity:
Issuance of common stock to settle compensation liabilities
2,953
6,551
Issuance of common stock to settle contingent consideration liabilities (NOTE 7)
8,750
Net increase in total equity due to consolidations of tax credit entities (NOTE 10)
10,447
Net increase in total assets due to consolidations of tax credit entities (NOTE 10)
13,700
Net increase in total liabilities due to consolidations of tax credit entities (NOTE 10)
3,559
Forgiveness of receivables related to acquisitions
5,460
Charge-off of loan held for investment
(6,033)
Additions of contingent consideration liabilities from acquisitions (NOTE 7)
117,000
8
NOTE 1—ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
These financial statements represent the condensed consolidated financial position and results of operations of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Walker & Dunlop” and the “Company” mean the Walker & Dunlop consolidated companies. The statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they may not include certain financial statement disclosures and other information required for annual financial statements. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (“2022 Form 10-K”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the Company in the interim periods presented have been included. Results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2023 or thereafter.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is a holding company and conducts the majority of its operations through Walker & Dunlop, LLC, the operating company. Walker & Dunlop is one of the leading commercial real estate services and finance companies in the United States. The Company originates, sells, and services a range of commercial real estate debt and equity financing products, provides multifamily property sales brokerage and valuation services, engages in commercial real estate investment management activities with a particular focus on the affordable housing sector through low-income housing tax credit (“LIHTC”) syndication, provides housing market research, and delivers real estate-related investment banking and advisory services.
Through its agency lending products, the Company originates and sells loans pursuant to the programs of the Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac” and, together with Fannie Mae, the “GSEs”), the Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”), and the Federal Housing Administration, a division of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (together with Ginnie Mae, “HUD”). Through its debt brokerage products, the Company brokers, and in some cases services, loans for various life insurance companies, commercial banks, commercial mortgage-backed securities issuers, and other institutional investors.
NOTE 2—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation—The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Walker & Dunlop, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and its majority owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The Company consolidates entities in which it has a controlling financial interest based on either the variable interest entity (“VIE”) or the voting interest model. The Company is required to first apply the VIE model to determine whether it holds a variable interest in an entity, and if so, whether the entity is a VIE. If the Company determines it holds a variable interest in a VIE and has a controlling financial interest and therefore is considered the primary beneficiary, the Company consolidates the entity. In instances where the Company holds a variable interest in a VIE but is not the primary beneficiary, the Company uses the equity-method of accounting.
If the Company determines it does not hold a variable interest in a VIE, it then applies the voting interest model. Under the voting interest model, the Company consolidates an entity when it holds a majority voting interest in an entity. If the Company does not have a majority voting interest but has significant influence, it uses the equity method of accounting. In instances where the Company owns less than 100% of the equity interests of an entity but owns a majority of the voting interests or has control over an entity, the Company accounts for the portion of equity not attributable to Walker & Dunlop, Inc. as Noncontrolling interests on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and the portion of net income not attributable to Walker & Dunlop, Inc. as Net income (loss) from noncontrolling interests in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.
Subsequent Events—The Company has evaluated the effects of all events that have occurred subsequent to June 30, 2023. The Company has made certain disclosures in the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements of events that have occurred subsequent to June 30, 2023. There have been no other material subsequent events that would require recognition in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates—The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, including the allowance for risk-sharing obligations, initial and recurring fair value assessments of capitalized mortgage servicing rights, and the initial and recurring fair value assessments of contingent consideration liabilities. Actual results may vary from these estimates.
9
Provision (Benefit) for Credit Losses—The Company records the income statement impact of the changes in the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for risk-sharing obligations within Provision (benefit) for credit losses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. NOTE 4 contains additional discussion related to the allowance for risk-sharing obligations. The Company has credit risk exclusively on loans secured by multifamily real estate, with no exposure to any other sector of commercial real estate, including office, retail, industrial and hospitality. Substantially all of the Provision (benefit) for credit losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 is related to the provision (benefit) for risk-sharing obligations.
Loans Held for Investment, net—Loans held for investment are multifamily interim loans originated by the Company for properties that currently do not qualify for permanent GSE or HUD (collectively, the “Agencies”) financing (“Interim Loan Program”). These loans have terms of up to three years and are all adjustable-rate, interest-only, multifamily loans with similar risk characteristics and no geographic concentration. The loans are carried at their unpaid principal balances, adjusted for net unamortized loan fees and costs, and net of any allowance for loan losses.
As of June 30, 2023, Loans held for investment, net consisted of three loans with an aggregate $71.8 million of unpaid principal balance less an immaterial amount of net unamortized deferred fees and costs and allowance for loan losses. As of December 31, 2022, Loans held for investment, net consisted of nine loans with an aggregate $206.8 million of unpaid principal balance less $0.4 million of net unamortized deferred fees and costs and $6.2 million of allowance for loan losses.
The Company did not have any loans held for investment that were delinquent and on non-accrual status as of June 30, 2023, compared to one loan held for investment with an unpaid principal balance of $14.7 million as of December 31, 2022. During the second quarter of 2023, the Company charged off the $14.7 million delinquent loan, with an immaterial amount of provision for loan losses recorded in connection with the charge off. The Company had $5.9 million in collateral-based reserves for this loan as of December 31, 2022 and had not recorded any interest related to this loan since it went on non-accrual status in 2019. The Company has not previously charged off any other loan or had any other delinquencies related to loans held for investment. The amortized cost basis of loans that were current as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 was $71.7 million and $191.7 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2023, all loans held for investment were originated between 2019 and 2022.
Statement of Cash Flows—For presentation in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers pledged cash and cash equivalents (as detailed in NOTE 9) to be restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents. The following table presents a reconciliation of the total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents as presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows to the related captions in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2023 and 2022 and December 31, 2022 and 2021.
December 31,
(in thousands)
2021
151,252
305,635
34,361
42,812
Pledged cash and cash equivalents (NOTE 9)
34,032
10,149
14,658
44,733
Total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents
Income Taxes—The Company records the realizable excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation as a reduction to income tax expense. The realizable excess tax benefits were a $0.1 million shortfall and a $0.3 million benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and benefits of $1.5 million and $5.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
10
Net Warehouse Interest Income—The Company presents warehouse interest income net of warehouse interest expense. Warehouse interest income is the interest earned from loans held for sale and loans held for investment. Generally, a substantial portion of the Company’s loans is financed with matched borrowings under one of its warehouse facilities. The remaining portion of loans not funded with matched borrowings is financed with the Company’s own cash. The Company also occasionally fully funds a small number of loans held for sale or loans held for investment with its own cash. Warehouse interest expense is incurred on borrowings used to fund loans solely while they are held for sale or for investment. Warehouse interest income and expense are earned or incurred on loans held for sale after a loan is closed and before a loan is sold. Warehouse interest income and expense are earned or incurred on loans held for investment after a loan is closed and before a loan is repaid. Included in Net warehouse interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 are the following components:
Components of Net Warehouse Interest Income (in thousands)
Warehouse interest income
11,596
15,190
22,103
26,403
Warehouse interest expense
(13,122)
(9,922)
(23,628)
(16,362)
Net warehouse interest income (expense)
Co-broker Fees—Third-party co-broker fees are netted against Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and were $3.5 million and $4.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively, and $6.8 million and $10.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively.
Contracts with Customers—A majority of the Company’s revenues are derived from the following sources, all of which are excluded from the accounting provisions applicable to contracts with customers: (i) financial instruments, (ii) transfers and servicing, (iii) derivative transactions, and (iv) investments in debt securities/equity-method investments. The remaining portion of revenues is derived from contracts with customers.
The majority of the Company’s contracts with customers do not require significant judgment or material estimates that affect the determination of the transaction price (including the assessment of variable consideration), the allocation of the transaction price to performance obligations, and the determination of the timing of the satisfaction of performance obligations. Additionally, the earnings process for the majority all of the Company’s contracts with customers is not complicated and is generally completed in a short period of time. The following table presents information about the Company’s contracts with customers for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022:
Description (in thousands)
Statement of income line item
Certain loan origination fees
20,694
53,281
34,723
90,646
Application fees, appraisal revenues, subscription revenues, other revenues from LIHTC operations, and other revenues
18,926
29,294
41,464
42,741
Total revenues derived from contracts with customers
66,274
145,147
129,638
234,215
Litigation—In the ordinary course of business, the Company may be party to various claims and litigation, none of which the Company believes is material, and the Company has accrued its best estimate of any probable impacts from pending litigation in its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company cannot predict the outcome of any pending litigation and may be subject to consequences that could include fines, penalties, and other costs, and the Company’s reputation and business may be impacted. The Company believes that any liability that could be imposed on the Company in connection with the disposition of any pending lawsuits would not have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition.
11
Recently Adopted and Recently Announced Accounting Pronouncements—There have been no material changes to the accounting policies discussed in NOTE 2 of the 2022 Form 10-K. There are no recently announced but not yet effective accounting pronouncements that are expected to have a material impact to the Company as of June 30, 2023.
Reclassifications—The Company has made certain immaterial reclassifications to prior-year balances to conform to current-year presentation.
NOTE 3—MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
The fair value of the mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) was $1.4 billion as of both June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022. The Company uses a discounted static cash flow valuation approach, and the key economic assumption is the discount rate. For example, see the following sensitivities related to the discount rate:
The impact of a 100-basis point increase in the discount rate at June 30, 2023 would be a decrease in the fair value of $42.4 million to the MSRs outstanding as of June 30, 2023.
The impact of a 200-basis point increase in the discount rate at June 30, 2023 would be a decrease in the fair value of $82.0 million to the MSRs outstanding as of June 30, 2023.
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution, and these estimates do not include interplay among assumptions.
Activity related to MSRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 follows:
Roll Forward of MSRs (in thousands)
Beginning balance
946,406
976,554
953,845
Additions, following the sale of loan
38,119
60,445
62,149
137,299
Amortization
(49,467)
(47,098)
(98,909)
(93,455)
Pre-payments and write-offs
(2,927)
(11,156)
(6,335)
(18,944)
Ending balance
978,745
The following table summarizes the gross value, accumulated amortization, and net carrying value of the Company’s MSRs as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
Components of MSRs (in thousands)
Gross value
1,682,025
1,659,185
Accumulated amortization
(749,894)
(683,959)
Net carrying value
12
The expected amortization of MSRs shown in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2023 is shown in the table below. Actual amortization may vary from these estimates.
Expected
Six Months Ending December 31,
96,807
Year Ending December 31,
2024
181,006
2025
158,432
2026
132,857
2027
112,750
2028
91,921
Thereafter
158,358
NOTE 4—ALLOWANCE FOR RISK-SHARING OBLIGATIONS
When a loan is sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program, the Company typically agrees to guarantee a portion of the ultimate loss incurred on the loan should the borrower fail to perform. The compensation for this risk is a component of the servicing fee on the loan. The guaranty is in force while the loan is outstanding. The Company does not provide a guaranty for any other loan product it sells or brokers. Substantially all loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program contain modified or full-risk sharing guaranties that are based on the credit performance of the loan. The Company records an estimate of the contingent loss reserve for Current Expected Credit Losses (“CECL”) for all loans in its Fannie Mae at-risk servicing portfolio and also records collateral-based reserves as necessary and presents this combined loss reserve as Allowance for risk-sharing obligations on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Activity related to the allowance for risk-sharing obligations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 follows:
Roll Forward of Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligations (in thousands)
33,087
53,244
62,636
Provision (benefit) for risk-sharing obligations
(677)
(4,769)
(11,647)
(14,161)
Write-offs
48,475
The Company assesses several factors to calculate the CECL allowance each quarter including the current and expected unemployment rate, macroeconomic conditions and multifamily market. The key inputs for the CECL allowance are the historic loss rate, the forecast-period loss rate, the reversion-period loss rate, and the UPB of the at-risk servicing portfolio. A summary of the key inputs of the CECL allowance as of the end of each of the quarters presented and the provision impact during each quarter for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 follows.
CECL Calculation Details and Provision Impact
Q1
Q2
Forecast-period loss rate (in basis points)
2.3
N/A
Reversion-period loss rate (in basis points)
1.5
Historical loss rate (in basis points)
0.6
At-risk Fannie Mae servicing portfolio UPB (in billions)
54.5
55.7
CECL allowance (in millions)
28.7
28.9
Provision (benefit) for risk-sharing obligations (in millions)
(10.9)
(0.7)
(11.6)
13
3.0
2.2
2.0
1.7
1.2
49.7
51.2
42.5
37.7
(9.4)
(4.8)
(14.2)
During the first quarters of 2023 and 2022, the Company updated its 10-year look-back period resulting in loss data from earlier periods being replaced with more recent loss data. The look-back period updates resulted in the historical loss rate factor decreasing and the benefit for risk-sharing obligations as noted in the table above. The Company also slightly increased its forecast-period and reversion-period loss rates, during the three months ended March 31, 2023, to incorporate uncertain macroeconomic conditions. For the three months ended March 31, 2022, no adjustment was made to the forecast-period loss rate.
During the second quarter of 2023, the benefit for risk-sharing obligations shown above was the result of an updated collateral-based reserve, as the Company agreed on a settlement amount with Fannie Mae. The Company settled this risk-sharing obligation with Fannie Mae during the third quarter of 2023 for $2.0 million. During the second quarter of 2022, the benefit for risk-sharing obligations seen above was a result of the reductions in the forecast-period and reversion-period rates seen above as the remaining risks and uncertainties related to the COVID-19 pandemic were removed from the forecast-period and reversion period loss rates.
The weighted average remaining life of the at-risk Fannie Mae servicing portfolio as of June 30, 2023 was 6.8 years compared to 7.2 years as of December 31, 2022.
Two loans had aggregate collateral-based reserves of $3.5 million as of June 30, 2023 and $4.4 million as of December 31, 2022.
As of June 30, 2023 and 2022, the maximum quantifiable contingent liability associated with the Company’s guaranties for the at-risk loans serviced under the Fannie Mae DUS agreement was $11.3 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively. This maximum quantifiable contingent liability relates to the at-risk loans serviced for Fannie Mae at the specific point in time indicated. The maximum quantifiable contingent liability is not representative of the actual loss the Company would incur. The Company would be liable for this amount only if all of the loans it services for Fannie Mae, for which the Company retains some risk of loss, were to default and all of the collateral underlying these loans were determined to be without value at the time of settlement.
NOTE 5—SERVICING
The total unpaid principal balance of loans the Company was servicing for various institutional investors was $126.6 billion as of June 30, 2023 compared to $123.1 billion as of December 31, 2022.
As of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, custodial escrow accounts relating to loans serviced by the Company totaled $2.8 billion and $2.7 billion, respectively. These amounts are not included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as such amounts are not Company assets; however, the Company is entitled to placement fees on these escrow balances, presented within Escrow earnings and other interest income in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Certain cash deposits exceed Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits; however, the Company believes it has mitigated this risk by holding uninsured deposits balances at large national banks.
NOTE 6—WAREHOUSE NOTES PAYABLE AND NOTES PAYABLE
As of June 30, 2023, to provide financing to borrowers under the Agencies’ programs, the Company has committed and uncommitted warehouse lines of credit in the amount of $3.9 billion with certain national banks and a $1.5 billion uncommitted facility with Fannie Mae (collectively, the “Agency Warehouse Facilities”). In support of these Agency Warehouse Facilities, the Company has pledged substantially all of its loans held for sale under the Company’s approved programs. The Company’s ability to originate mortgage loans for sale depends upon its ability to secure and maintain these types of financings on acceptable terms. As the Company’s committed and uncommitted facilities are
14
with national banks, the recent failures within the U.S. banking system have had no impact on the availability or amount of the Company’s Agency Warehouse Facilities.
Additionally, the Company has arranged for warehouse lines of credit with certain national banks to assist in funding loans held for investment under the Interim Loan Program (“Interim Warehouse Facilities”). The Company has pledged substantially all of its loans held for investment against these Interim Warehouse Facilities. The Company’s ability to originate and hold loans held for investment depends upon market conditions and its ability to secure and maintain these types of financings on acceptable terms. As of June 30, 2023, the Interim Warehouse Facilities had $454.8 million of total facility capacity with an outstanding balance of $53.8 million. The interest rate on the Interim Warehouse Facilities ranged from SOFR (defined below) plus 135 to 325 basis points.
The interest rate for all our warehouse facilities and debt is based on an Adjusted Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”). The maximum amount and outstanding borrowings under Agency Warehouse Facilities as of June 30, 2023 follows:
(dollars in thousands)
Committed
Uncommitted
Total Facility
Outstanding
Facility
Capacity
Balance
Interest rate(1)
Agency Warehouse Facility #1
325,000
250,000
575,000
68,449
SOFR plus 1.30%
Agency Warehouse Facility #2
700,000
300,000
1,000,000
441,608
Agency Warehouse Facility #3
600,000
265,000
865,000
363,355
SOFR plus 1.35%
Agency Warehouse Facility #4
200,000
225,000
425,000
118,998
SOFR plus 1.30% to 1.35%
Agency Warehouse Facility #5
64,059
SOFR plus 1.45%
Total National Bank Agency Warehouse Facilities
1,825,000
2,040,000
3,865,000
1,056,469
Fannie Mae repurchase agreement, uncommitted line and open maturity
1,500,000
232,320
Total Agency Warehouse Facilities
3,540,000
5,365,000
1,288,789
During 2023, the following amendments to the Company’s Agency Warehouse Facilities and Notes Payable were executed in the normal course of business to support the growth of the Company’s business. Additionally, the Company had a note payable through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Alliant, which had an outstanding balance of $114.5 million as of December 31, 2022. As noted below, on January 12, 2023, the Company repaid the Alliant note payable in full with proceeds from the Incremental Term Loan (as defined below).
Agency Warehouse Facilities
During April 2023, the Company executed an amendment to Agency Warehouse Facility #2 that extended the maturity date to April 12, 2024. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2023.
During May 2023, the Company executed an amendment to Agency Warehouse Facility #3 that extended the maturity date to May 15, 2024. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2023.
During June 2023, the Company executed an amendment to Agency Warehouse Facility #4 that extended the maturity date to June 22, 2024 and updated the interest rate from SOFR plus 130 basis points to SOFR plus 130 to 135 basis points. No other material modifications have been made to the agreement during 2023.
No other material modifications have been made to the Agency Warehouse Facilities during the year.
Incremental Term Loan
As of December 31, 2022, the Company had a senior secured credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) that provided for a $600 million term loan (the “Term Loan”). On January 12, 2023, the Company entered into a lender joinder agreement and amendment to the Credit Agreement that provided for an increment term loan (“Incremental Term Loan”) with a principal amount of $200.0 million, modified the ratio thresholds related to mandatory prepayments, and included a provision that allows additional types of indebtedness. The Incremental Term
15
Loan was issued at a 2.0% discount and contains similar repayment terms as the Term Loan, bears interest at a rate equal to SOFR plus 300 basis points, and matures on December 16, 2028. The Company used approximately $115.9 million of the proceeds to pay off the Alliant note payable principal balance, accrued interest, and other fees. The Company is obligated to make principal payments on the Incremental Term Loan in consecutive quarterly installments equal to 0.25% of the aggregate original principal amount of the Incremental Term Loan on the last business day of each March, June, September, and December that commenced on of June 30, 2023.
The warehouse notes payable and notes payable are subject to various financial covenants. The Company is in compliance with all of these financial covenants. As a result of the expected transition from LIBOR, the Company has transitioned all of its debt agreements to a SOFR-based benchmark or has included fallback language to govern the transition from 30-day LIBOR to an alternative reference rate.
NOTE 7—GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
A summary of the Company’s goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 follows:
Roll Forward of Goodwill (in thousands)
698,635
Additions from acquisitions
213,874
Measurement-period and other adjustments
3,998
25,372
Impairment
937,881
The following table shows goodwill by reportable segments as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.
As of
Goodwill by Reportable Segment (in thousands)
Capital Markets
524,189
520,191
Servicing & Asset Management
439,521
Other Intangible Assets
Activity related to other intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 follows:
Roll Forward of Other Intangible Assets (in thousands)
183,904
31,000
(8,724)
(7,880)
207,024
The following table summarizes the gross value, accumulated amortization, and net carrying value of the Company’s other intangible assets as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
Components of Other Intangible Assets (in thousands)
220,682
(30,763)
(22,039)
16
The expected amortization of other intangible assets shown in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2023 is shown in the table below. Actual amortization may vary from these estimates.
8,539
16,206
100,350
Contingent Consideration Liabilities
A summary of the Company’s contingent consideration liabilities, which are included in Other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 follows:
Roll Forward of Contingent Consideration Liabilities (in thousands)
200,346
125,808
Additions
Accretion
353
1,823
Payments
(26,439)
175,009
218,192
The contingent consideration liabilities presented in the table above relate to (i) acquisitions of debt brokerage and investment sales brokerage companies completed over the past several years, (ii) the purchase of noncontrolling interests in 2020 that was fully earned as of December 31, 2021 and paid in 2022, (iii) the Alliant acquisition, and (iv) the GeoPhy acquisition. The contingent consideration for each of the acquisitions may be earned over various lengths of time after each acquisition, with a maximum earnout period of five years, provided certain revenue targets and other metrics have been met. The last of the earnout periods related to the contingent consideration ends in the third quarter of 2027. In each case, the Company estimated the initial fair value of the contingent consideration using a Monte Carlo simulation.
The recognition of the contingent consideration liability for the GeoPhy acquisition in the first quarter of 2022 is non-cash, and thus not reflected in the amount of cash consideration paid on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. In addition, $8.8 million of the payments settling contingent consideration liabilities included in the table above for the six months ended June 30, 2022 were from the issuance of the Company’s common stock, a non-cash transaction.
NOTE 8—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company uses valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach, and/or the cost approach to measure assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. In that regard, accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that
17
gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
The Company's MSRs are measured at fair value at inception, and thereafter on a nonrecurring basis. That is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value measurement when there is impairment and for disclosure purposes (NOTE 3). The Company's MSRs do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of the Company’s MSRs was developed using discounted cash flow models that calculate the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The model considers contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, estimated revenue from escrow accounts, costs to service, and other economic factors. The Company periodically reassesses and adjusts, when necessary, the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the model to reflect observable market conditions and assumptions that market participants consider in valuing MSR assets. MSRs are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value.
A description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.
18
The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy used to measure fair value:
Balance as of
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Period End
Loans held for sale
Pledged securities
136,634
Derivative assets
42,341
1,440,320
1,516,693
Derivative liabilities
22,100
Contingent consideration liabilities
197,109
142,624
17,636
538,968
571,262
2,076
202,422
There were no transfers between any of the levels within the fair value hierarchy during the six months ended June 30, 2023.
Derivative instruments (Level 3) are outstanding for short periods of time (generally less than 60 days). A roll forward of derivative instruments is presented below for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022:
Derivative Assets and Liabilities, net (in thousands)
(7,729)
99,623
15,560
30,961
Settlements
(79,056)
(211,543)
(179,442)
(277,921)
Realized gains recorded in earnings(1)
86,785
111,920
163,882
246,960
Unrealized gains (losses) recorded in earnings(1)
20,241
42,634
19
The following table presents information about significant unobservable inputs used in the recurring measurement of the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2023:
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value
Valuation Technique
Unobservable Input (1)
Input Range (1)
Weighted Average (2)
Discounted cash flow
Counterparty credit risk
Monte Carlo Simulation
Probability of earnout achievement
64% - 100%
77%
The carrying amounts and the fair values of the Company's financial instruments as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022 are presented below:
Carrying
Fair
Value
Financial Assets:
Loans held for investment, net(1)
71,462
71,785
200,247
200,900
Derivative assets(1)
Total financial assets
1,838,015
1,838,338
1,015,134
1,015,787
Financial Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities(2)
Contingent consideration liabilities(2)
1,342,623
538,134
790,500
708,546
Total financial liabilities
2,315,291
2,330,232
1,444,056
1,449,102
The following methods and assumptions were used for recurring fair value measurements as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash—The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments (Level 1).
Pledged Securities—Consist of cash, highly liquid investments in money market accounts invested in government securities, and investments in Agency debt securities. The investments of the money market funds typically have maturities of 90 days or less and are valued using quoted market prices from recent trades. The fair value of the Agency debt securities incorporates the contractual cash flows of the security discounted at market-rate, risk-adjusted yields.
Loans Held for Sale—Consist of originated loans that are generally transferred or sold within 60 days from the date that a mortgage loan is funded and are valued using discounted cash flow models that incorporate observable prices from market participants.
20
Contingent Consideration Liabilities— Consists of the estimated fair values of expected future earnout payments related to acquisitions completed over the past several years. The earnout liabilities are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation analysis. The fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities incorporates unobservable inputs, such as the probability of earnout achievement, volatility rates, and discount rate, to determine the expected earnout cash flows. The probability of the earnout achievement is based on management’s estimate of the expected future performance and other financial metrics of each of the acquired entities, which are subject to significant uncertainty.
Derivative Instruments—Consist of interest rate lock commitments and forward sale agreements. These instruments are valued using discounted cash flow models developed based on changes in the U.S. Treasury rate and other observable market data. The value is determined after considering the potential impact of collateralization, adjusted to reflect nonperformance risk of both the counterparty and the Company.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments and Loans Held for Sale—In the normal course of business, the Company enters into contractual commitments to originate and sell multifamily mortgage loans at fixed prices with fixed expiration dates. The commitments become effective when the borrowers "lock-in" a specified interest rate within time frames established by the Company. All mortgagors are evaluated for creditworthiness prior to the extension of the commitment. Market risk arises if interest rates move adversely between the time of the "lock-in" of rates by the borrower and the sale date of the loan to an investor.
To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments to borrowers, the Company enters into a sale commitment with the investor simultaneously with the rate lock commitment with the borrower. The sale contract with the investor locks in an interest rate and price for the sale of the loan. The terms of the contract with the investor and the rate lock with the borrower are matched in substantially all respects, with the objective of eliminating interest rate risk to the extent practical. Sale commitments with the investors have an expiration date that is longer than our related commitments to the borrower to allow, among other things, for the closing of the loan and processing of paperwork to deliver the loan into the sale commitment.
Both the rate lock commitments to borrowers and the forward sale contracts to buyers are undesignated derivatives and, accordingly, are marked to fair value through Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The fair value of the Company's rate lock commitments to borrowers and loans held for sale and the related input levels includes, as applicable:
The estimated gain considers the origination fees the Company expects to collect upon loan closing (derivative instruments only) and premiums the Company expects to receive upon sale of the loan (Level 2). The fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with servicing the loan is calculated pursuant to the valuation techniques applicable to the fair value of future servicing, net at loan sale (Level 2).
To calculate the effects of interest rate movements, the Company uses applicable published U.S. Treasury prices, and multiplies the price movement between the rate lock date and the balance sheet date by the notional loan commitment amount (Level 2).
The fair value of the Company's forward sales contracts to investors considers effects of interest rate movements between the trade date and the balance sheet date (Level 2). The market price changes are multiplied by the notional amount of the forward sales contracts to measure the fair value.
The fair value of the Company’s interest rate lock commitments and forward sales contracts is adjusted to reflect the risk that the agreement will not be fulfilled. The Company’s exposure to nonperformance in interest rate lock commitments and forward sale contracts is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Given the credit quality of our counterparties and the short duration of interest rate lock commitments and forward sale contracts, the risk of nonperformance by the Company’s counterparties has historically been minimal (Level 3).
21
The following table presents the components of fair value and other relevant information associated with the Company’s derivative instruments and loans held for sale as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
Fair Value Adjustment Components
Balance Sheet Location
Notional or
Estimated
Adjustment
Principal
Gain
Interest Rate
Derivative
to Loans
on Sale
Movement
Held for Sale
Rate lock commitments
591,732
15,684
(8,177)
7,507
10,251
(2,744)
Forward sale contracts
1,886,195
12,734
32,090
(19,356)
1,294,463
13,780
(4,557)
9,223
29,464
(22,100)
376,870
12,349
(4,495)
7,854
769,585
7,706
9,782
(2,076)
392,715
6,840
(3,211)
3,629
19,189
NOTE 9—FANNIE MAE COMMITMENTS AND PLEDGED SECURITIES
Fannie Mae DUS Related Commitments—Commitments for the origination and subsequent sale and delivery of loans to Fannie Mae represent those mortgage loan transactions where the borrower has locked an interest rate and scheduled closing, and the Company has entered into a mandatory delivery commitment to sell the loan to Fannie Mae. As discussed in NOTE 8, the Company accounts for these commitments as derivatives recorded at fair value.
The Company is generally required to share the risk of any losses associated with loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program. The Company is required to secure these obligations by assigning restricted cash balances and securities to Fannie Mae, which are classified as Pledged securities, at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amount of collateral required by Fannie Mae is a formulaic calculation at the loan level and considers the balance of the loan, the risk level of the loan, the age of the loan, and the level of risk-sharing. Fannie Mae requires restricted liquidity for Tier 2 loans of 75 basis points, which is funded over a 48-month period that begins upon delivery of the loan to Fannie Mae. Pledged securities held in the form of money market funds holding U.S. Treasuries are discounted 5%, and Agency mortgage-backed securities (“Agency MBS”) are discounted 4% for purposes of calculating compliance with the restricted liquidity requirements. As seen below, the Company held the majority of its pledged securities in Agency MBS as of June 30, 2023. The majority of the loans for which the Company has risk sharing are Tier 2 loans.
The Company is in compliance with the June 30, 2023 collateral requirements as outlined above. As of June 30, 2023, reserve requirements for the DUS loan portfolio will require the Company to fund $74.8 million in additional restricted liquidity over the next 48 months, assuming no further principal paydowns, prepayments, or defaults within the at-risk portfolio. Fannie Mae has reassessed the DUS Capital Standards in the past and may make changes to these standards in the future. The Company generates sufficient cash flow from its operations to meet these capital standards and does not expect any future changes to have a material impact on its future operations; however, any future increases to collateral requirements may adversely impact the Company’s available cash.
Fannie Mae has established benchmark standards for capital adequacy and reserves the right to terminate the Company's servicing authority for all or some of the portfolio if, at any time, it determines that the Company's financial condition is not adequate to support its obligations under the DUS agreement. The Company is required to maintain acceptable net worth as defined in the agreement, and the Company satisfied the requirements as of June 30, 2023. The net worth requirement is derived primarily from unpaid principal balances on Fannie Mae loans and the level of risk sharing. As of June 30, 2023, the net worth requirement was $291.1 million, and the Company's net worth, as defined in the requirements, was $1.0 billion, as measured at our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop, LLC. As of June 30, 2023, the Company was required to maintain at least $57.9 million of liquid assets to meet operational liquidity requirements for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and Ginnie Mae, and the Company had operational liquidity, as defined in the requirements, of $205.4 million as of June 30, 2023, as measured at our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop, LLC.
22
Pledged Securities, at Fair Value—Pledged securities, at fair value consisted of the following balances as of June 30, 2023 and 2022 and December 31, 2022 and 2021:
Pledged Securities (in thousands)
3,047
5,979
5,788
3,779
Money market funds
30,985
4,170
8,870
40,954
Total pledged cash and cash equivalents
Agency MBS
139,411
104,263
Total pledged securities, at fair value
149,560
148,996
The information in the preceding table is presented to reconcile beginning and ending cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as more fully discussed in NOTE 2.
The Company’s investments included within Pledged securities, at fair value consist primarily of money market funds and Agency debt securities. The investments in Agency debt securities consist of multifamily Agency MBS and are all accounted for as AFS securities. When the fair value of Agency MBS is lower than the carrying value, the Company assesses whether an allowance for credit losses is necessary. The Company does not record an allowance for credit losses for its AFS securities, including those whose fair value is less than amortized cost, when the AFS securities are issued by the GSEs. The contractual cash flows of these AFS securities are guaranteed by the GSEs, which are government-sponsored enterprises under the conservatorship of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Accordingly, it is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of these securities. The Company does not intend to sell any of the Agency MBS whose fair value is less than the carrying value, nor does the Company believe that it is more likely than not that it would be required to sell these investments before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity. The following table provides additional information related to the Agency MBS as of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022:
Fair Value and Amortized Cost of Agency MBS (in thousands)
Fair value
Amortized cost
138,590
144,801
Total gains for securities with net gains in AOCI
534
797
Total losses for securities with net losses in AOCI
(2,490)
(2,974)
Fair value of securities with unrealized losses
118,116
118,565
Pledged securities with a fair value of $96.6 million, an amortized cost of $98.9 million, and a net unrealized loss of $2.3 million have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for more than 12 months, with the unrealized losses driven primarily by widening investor spreads as a result of the rapid increase in interest rates and related market uncertainty over the last 12 months. All securities that have been in a continuous loss position are Agency debt securities that carry a guarantee of the contractual payments. The Company concluded that an allowance for credit losses is not warranted, as the Company does not intend to sell the securities and does not believe it would be required to sell the securities, and as they carry the guarantee of payment from the Agencies.
The following table provides contractual maturity information related to Agency MBS. The money market funds invest in short-term Federal Government and Agency debt securities and have no stated maturity date.
Detail of Agency MBS Maturities (in thousands)
Amortized Cost
Within one year
After one year through five years
15,308
15,369
After five years through ten years
99,789
100,648
After ten years
21,537
22,573
23
NOTE 10—EARNINGS PER SHARE AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated under the two-class method. The two-class method allocates all earnings (distributed and undistributed) to each class of common stock and participating securities based on their respective rights to receive dividends. The Company grants share-based awards to various employees and nonemployee directors under the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan that entitle recipients to receive nonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period on a basis equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of common stock. These unvested awards meet the definition of participating securities.
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 under the two-class method. Participating securities were included in the calculation of diluted EPS using the two-class method, as this computation was more dilutive than the treasury-stock method.
For the three months ended June 30,
EPS Calculations (in thousands, except per share amounts)
Calculation of basic EPS
Less: dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities
703
1,554
1,410
3,708
Net income applicable to common stockholders
26,932
52,732
52,890
121,787
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding
Basic EPS
Calculation of diluted EPS
Add: reallocation of dividends and undistributed earnings based on assumed conversion
1
2
27
Net income allocated to common stockholders
26,933
52,741
52,892
121,814
Add: weighted-average diluted non-participating securities
306
222
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding
Diluted EPS
The assumed proceeds used for calculating the dilutive impact of restricted stock awards under the treasury-stock method includes the unrecognized compensation costs associated with the awards. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, 456 thousand average restricted shares and 442 thousand average restricted shares, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS under the treasury-stock method. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, 136 thousand average restricted shares and 87 thousand average restricted shares, respectively, were excluded from the computation. These average restricted shares were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS under the treasury method because the effect would have been anti-dilutive, as the grant date market price of the restricted shares was greater than the average market price of the Company’s shares of common stock during the periods presented.
The following non-cash transactions did not impact the amount of cash paid on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. During 2022, the operating agreement of three of the Company’s tax-credit-related joint ventures changed. The Company reconsidered its consolidation conclusion based on these changes and concluded that the joint ventures should be consolidated, resulting in a $3.7 million increase in APIC and $6.8 million of noncontrolling interests consolidated as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2022. The consolidation also resulted in a $35.0 million increase in Receivables, net, a $21.3 million reduction in Other assets, and a $3.6 million increase in Other liabilities.
In February 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that permits the repurchase of up to $75.0 million of the Company’s common stock over a 12-month period beginning on February 23, 2023. During the first six months of 2023, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock under the share repurchase program. As of June 30, 2023, the Company had $75.0 million of authorized share repurchase capacity remaining under the 2023 share repurchase program.
24
During each of the first and second quarters of 2023, the Company paid a dividend of $0.63 per share. On August 2, 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.63 per share for the third quarter of 2023. The dividend will be paid on September 1, 2023 to all holders of record of the Company’s restricted and unrestricted common stock as of August 17, 2023.
The Company’s Note Payable (“Term Loan”) contains direct restrictions on the amount of dividends the Company may pay, and the warehouse debt facilities and agreements with the Agencies contain minimum equity, liquidity, and other capital requirements that indirectly restrict the amount of dividends the Company may pay. The Company does not believe that these restrictions currently limit the amount of dividends the Company can pay for the foreseeable future.
NOTE 11—SEGMENTS
The Company’s executive leadership team, which functions as the Company’s chief operating decision making body, makes decisions and assesses performance based on the following three reportable segments. The reportable segments are determined based on the product or service provided and reflect the manner in which management is currently evaluating the Company’s financial information.
As part of Agency lending, CM temporarily funds the loans it originates (loans held for sale) before selling them to the Agencies and earns net interest income on the spread between the interest income on the loans and the warehouse interest expense. For Agency loans, CM recognizes the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, which represents the right to receive future servicing fees. CM also earns fees for origination of loans for both Agency lending and debt brokerage, fees for property sales, appraisals, and investment banking and advisory services, and subscription revenue for its housing market research. Direct internal, including compensation, and external costs that are specific to CM are included within the results of this reportable segment.
SAM earns revenue through (i) fees for servicing and asset-managing the loans in the Company’s servicing portfolio, (ii) asset management fees for managing third-party capital, and (iii) net interest income on the spread between the interest income on the loans and the warehouse interest expense for loans held for investment. Direct internal, including compensation, and external costs that are specific to SAM are included within the results of this reportable segment.
25
The following tables provide a summary and reconciliation of each segment’s results for the three months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.
For the three months ended June 30, 2023
Segment Results
Servicing &
Capital
Asset
Markets
Management
Corporate
Consolidated
64,574
394
(2,752)
1,226
32,337
3,049
11,760
15,513
741
125,985
142,840
3,790
93,067
21,189
19,049
1,089
53,550
1,653
4,727
10,707
1,576
5,200
9,946
15,584
104,083
94,658
37,862
21,902
48,182
(34,072)
Income tax expense (benefit)
5,572
14,787
(9,868)
16,330
33,395
(24,204)
223
(2,337)
16,107
35,732
26
For the three months ended June 30, 2022
102,085
520
3,707
1,561
6,648
11,491
25,780
172
215,618
124,955
275
138,716
17,819
11,833
1,083
58,469
1,551
1,535
4,528
349
5,873
5,269
25,053
147,207
81,245
38,786
68,411
43,710
(38,511)
17,499
11,175
(9,171)
50,912
32,535
(29,340)
653
(832)
50,259
33,367
The following tables provide a summary and reconciliation of each segment’s results for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022 and total assets as of June 30, 2023 and 2022.
As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2023
Segment Results and Total Assets
111,530
522
(4,441)
2,916
61,161
5,149
28,860
27,128
187
229,989
276,036
5,336
183,529
36,530
31,859
2,275
107,560
3,423
8,996
20,289
2,999
10,844
11,426
32,523
205,644
164,296
70,804
24,345
111,740
(65,468)
6,076
27,891
(16,341)
18,269
83,849
(49,127)
1,658
(2,967)
16,611
86,816
1,988,392
2,340,147
478,885
28
As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2022
183,908
1,007
7,237
2,804
8,406
148
18,827
41,246
44,261
384,435
231,448
44,409
243,675
34,483
34,391
1,139
113,362
2,754
3,058
9,064
695
13,074
10,298
45,037
260,946
152,869
82,877
123,489
78,579
(38,468)
29,410
18,715
(9,162)
94,079
59,864
(29,306)
718
(1,576)
93,361
61,440
1,688,848
2,531,093
314,831
4,534,772
29
NOTE 12—VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
The Company, through its subsidiary Alliant, provides alternative investment management services through the syndication of tax credit funds and the joint development of affordable housing projects. To facilitate the syndication and development of affordable housing projects, the Company is involved with the acquisition and/or formation of limited partnerships and joint ventures with investors, property developers, and property managers that are VIEs.
A detailed discussion of the Company’s accounting policies regarding the consolidation of VIEs and significant transactions involving VIEs is included in NOTE 2 and NOTE 17 of the 2022 Form 10-K.
As of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, the assets and liabilities of the consolidated tax credit funds were immaterial.
The table below presents the assets and liabilities of the Company’s consolidated joint development VIEs included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Consolidated VIEs (in thousands)
Assets:
791
201
2,605
1,532
32,400
33,593
Other Assets
50,679
49,768
Total assets of consolidated VIEs
86,475
85,094
Liabilities:
42,653
39,148
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs
The table below presents the carrying value and classification of the Company’s interests in nonconsolidated VIEs included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Nonconsolidated VIEs (in thousands)
Other assets: Equity-method investments
57,275
57,981
Total interests in nonconsolidated VIEs
222,411
312,135
Total commitments to fund nonconsolidated VIEs
Maximum exposure to losses(1)(2)
30
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the historical financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”). The following discussion contains, in addition to historical information, forward-looking statements that include risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those expressed or contemplated in those forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under the headings “Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” below and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (“2022 Form 10-K”).
Forward-Looking Statements
Some of the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company,” “Walker & Dunlop,” “we,” “us,” or “our”), may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, projections, plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” or “potential” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases which are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans, or intentions.
The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q reflect our current views about future events and are subject to numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions, and changes in circumstances that may cause actual results to differ significantly from those expressed or contemplated in any forward-looking statement. Statements regarding the following subjects, among others, may be forward-looking:
While forward-looking statements reflect our good-faith projections, assumptions, and expectations, they are not guarantees of future results. Furthermore, we disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying
assumptions or factors, new information, data or methods, future events or other changes, except as required by applicable law. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or contemplated in any forward-looking statements, see “Risk Factors.”
Business
Overview
We are a leading commercial real estate (i) services, (ii) finance, and (iii) technology company in the United States. Through investments in people, brand, and technology, we have built a diversified suite of commercial real estate services to meet the needs of our customers. Our services include (i) multifamily lending, property sales, appraisal, valuation, and research, (ii) commercial real estate debt brokerage and advisory services, (iii) investment management, and (iv) affordable housing lending, tax credit syndication, development, and investment. We leverage our technological resources and investments to (i) provide an enhanced experience for our customers, (ii) identify refinancing and other financial and investment opportunities for new and existing customers, and (iii) drive efficiencies in our internal processes. We believe our people, brand, and technology provide us with a competitive advantage, as evidenced by new loans to us representing 60% of refinancing volumes and 21% of total transaction volumes coming from new customers for the six months ended June 30, 2023.
We are one of the largest service providers to multifamily operators in the country. We originate, sell, and service a range of multifamily and other commercial real estate financing products, including loans through the programs of the GSEs, and the Federal Housing Administration, a division of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (together with Ginnie Mae, “HUD”) (collectively, the “Agencies”). We retain servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on substantially all loans that we originate for the Agencies’ programs. We broker, and occasionally service, loans to commercial real estate operators for many life insurance companies, commercial banks, and other institutional investors, in which cases we do not fund the loan but rather act as a loan broker.
We provide multifamily property sales brokerage and appraisal and valuation services and engage in commercial real estate investment management activities, including a focus on the affordable housing sector through low-income housing tax credit (“LIHTC”) syndication. We engage in the development and preservation of affordable housing projects through joint ventures with real estate developers and the management of funds focused on affordable housing. We provide housing market research and real estate-related investment banking and advisory services, which provide our clients and us with market insight into many areas of the housing market. Our clients are owners and developers of multifamily properties and other commercial real estate assets across the country, some of whom are the largest owners and developers in the industry. We also underwrite, service, and asset-manage shorter term loans on commercial real estate. Most of these shorter-term interim loans are closed through a joint venture or through separate accounts managed by our investment management subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop Investment Partners, Inc. (“WDIP”). Some of these interim loans are closed and retained by us through our Interim Program JV or Interim Loan Program (as defined below in Principal Lending and Investing). We are a leader in commercial real estate technology, developing and acquiring technology resources that (i) provide innovative solutions and a better experience for our customers and (ii) allow us to drive efficiencies across our internal processes.
We acquired GeoPhy B.V. (“GeoPhy”), a leading commercial real estate technology company based in the Netherlands, in the first quarter of 2022. We are using GeoPhy’s data analytics and technology development capabilities to accelerate the growth of our small-balance lending platform by providing data analytics and other technology capabilities and our technology-enabled appraisal and valuation platform, Apprise.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is a holding company. We conduct the majority of our operations through Walker & Dunlop, LLC, our operating company.
Segments
Our executive leadership team, which functions as our chief operating decision making body, makes decisions and assesses performance based on the following three reportable segments: (i) Capital Markets (“CM”), (ii) Servicing & Asset Management (“SAM”), and (iii) Corporate. The reportable segments are determined based on the product or service provided and reflect the manner in which management is currently evaluating the Company’s financial information. The segments and related services are described in the following paragraphs.
32
Capital Markets provides a comprehensive range of commercial real estate finance products to our customers, including Agency lending, debt brokerage, property sales, appraisal and valuation services, and real estate related investment banking and advisory services, including housing market research. Our long-established relationships with the Agencies and institutional investors enable us to offer a broad range of loan products and services to our customers. We provide property sales services to owners and developers of multifamily properties and commercial real estate and multifamily property appraisals for various investors. Additionally, we earn subscription fees for our housing related research. The primary services within CM are described below.
Agency Lending
We are one of the leading lenders with the Agencies, where we originate and sell multifamily, manufactured housing communities, student housing, affordable housing, seniors housing, and small-balance multifamily loans. For additional information on our Agency Lending services, refer to Item 1. Business in our 2022 Form 10-K.
We recognize loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net and the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net from our lending with the Agencies when we commit to both originate a loan with a borrower and sell that loan to an investor. The loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net and the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net for these transactions reflect the fair value attributable to loan origination fees, premiums on the sale of loans, net of any co-broker fees, and the fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with servicing the loans, net of any guaranty obligations retained.
We generally fund our Agency loan products through warehouse facility financing and sell them to investors in accordance with the related loan sale commitment, which we obtain concurrent with rate lock. Proceeds from the sale of the loan are used to pay off the warehouse facility borrowing. The sale of the loan is typically completed within 60 days after the loan is closed. We earn net warehouse interest income from loans held for sale while they are outstanding equal to the difference between the note rate on the loan and the cost of borrowing of the warehouse facility. On occasion, our cost of borrowing can exceed the note rate on the loan, resulting in a net interest expense.
Our loan commitments and loans held for sale are currently not exposed to unhedged interest rate risk during the loan commitment, closing, and delivery process. The sale or placement of each loan to an investor is negotiated at the same time we establish the coupon rate for the loan. We also seek to mitigate the risk of a loan not closing by collecting good faith deposits from the borrower. The deposit is returned to the borrower only once the loan is closed. Any potential loss from a catastrophic change in the property condition while the loan is held for sale using warehouse facility financing is mitigated through property insurance equal to replacement cost. We are also protected contractually from an investor’s failure to purchase the loan. We have experienced an immaterial number of failed deliveries in our history and have incurred immaterial losses on such failed deliveries.
As part of our overall growth strategy, we are focused on significantly growing and investing in our small-balance multifamily lending platform, which involves a high volume of transactions with smaller loan balances. In support of this strategy, we acquired GeoPhy as noted above.
Debt Brokerage
Our mortgage bankers who focus on debt brokerage are engaged by borrowers to work with a variety of institutional lenders and banks to find the most appropriate debt and/or equity solution for the borrowers’ needs. These financing solutions are then funded directly by the lender, and we receive an origination fee for our services.
Property Sales
We offer property sales brokerage services to owners and developers of multifamily properties that are seeking to sell these properties through our subsidiary Walker & Dunlop Investment Sales, LLC (“WDIS”). Through these property sales brokerage services, we seek to maximize proceeds and certainty of closure for our clients using our knowledge of the commercial real estate and capital markets and relying on our experienced transaction professionals. We receive a sales commission for brokering the sale of these multifamily assets on behalf of our clients, and we often are able to provide financing to the purchaser of the properties through our Agency or debt brokerage teams. Our property sales services are offered across the United States. We have increased the number of property sales brokers and the geographical reach of our investment sales platform over the past several years through hiring and acquisitions and intend to continue this expansion in support of our
growth strategy. To further support our growth strategy, we acquired an investment sales brokerage company during the third quarter of 2022, which expands our investment sales service offerings to include land sales.
Housing Market Research and Real Estate Investment Banking Services
We own a 75% interest in a subsidiary doing business as Zelman & Associates (“Zelman”). Zelman is a nationally recognized housing market research and investment banking firm that will enhance the information we provide to our clients and increase our access to high-quality market insight in many areas of the housing market, including construction trends, demographics, housing demand and mortgage finance. Zelman generates revenues through the sale of its housing market research data and related publications to banks, investment banks and other financial institutions. Zelman is also a leading independent investment bank providing comprehensive M&A advisory services and capital markets solutions to our clients within the housing and commercial real estate sectors. As part of our growth strategy, we have increased the number of investment bankers to broaden our reach and expertise within the residential housing, building products, multifamily and commercial real estate sectors.
Appraisal and Valuation Services
We offer multifamily appraisal and valuation services though our subsidiary, Apprise by Walker & Dunlop (“Apprise”). Apprise leverages technology and data science to dramatically improve the consistency, transparency, and speed of multifamily property appraisals in the U.S. through our proprietary technology and provides appraisal services to a client list that includes many national commercial real estate lenders. Apprise also provides quarterly and annual valuation services to some of the largest institutional commercial real estate investors in the country. Prior to the GeoPhy acquisition, we and GeoPhy each owned a 50% interest in Apprise, and we accounted for the interest as an equity-method investment. Subsequent to the GeoPhy acquisition, Apprise is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Walker & Dunlop. We have increased the number of valuation specialists and the geographical reach of our appraisal platform over the past several years through hiring and recruiting in support of our long-term growth strategy.
Servicing & Asset Management focuses on servicing and asset-managing the portfolio of loans we originate and sell to the Agencies, broker to certain life insurance companies, and originate through our principal lending and investing activities, and managing third-party capital invested in tax credit equity funds focused on the affordable housing sector and other commercial real estate. We earn servicing fees for overseeing the loans in our servicing portfolio and asset management fees for the capital invested in our funds. Additionally, we earn revenue through net interest income on the loans and the warehouse interest expense for loans held for investment. The primary services within SAM are described below.
Loan Servicing
We retain servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on substantially all of our Agency loan products that we originate and sell and generate cash revenues from the fees we receive for servicing the loans, from the interest income on escrow deposits held on behalf of borrowers, and from other ancillary fees relating to servicing the loans. Servicing fees, which are based on servicing fee rates set at the time an investor agrees to purchase the loan and on the unpaid principal balance of the loan, are generally paid monthly for the duration of the loan. Our Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac servicing arrangements generally provide for prepayment protection to us in the event of a voluntary prepayment. For loans serviced outside of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, we typically do not have similar prepayment protections. For most loans we service under the Fannie Mae DUS program, we are required to advance the principal and interest payments and guarantee fees for four months should a borrower cease making payments under the terms of their loan, including while that loan is in forbearance. After advancing for four months, we may request reimbursement by Fannie Mae for the principal and interest advances, and Fannie Mae will reimburse us for these advances within 60 days of the request. Under the Ginnie Mae program, we are obligated to advance the principal and interest payments and guarantee fees until the HUD loan is brought current, fully paid or assigned to HUD. We are eligible to assign a loan to HUD once it is in default for 30 days. If the loan is not brought current, or the loan otherwise defaults, we are not reimbursed for our advances until such time as we assign the loan to HUD or work out a payment modification for the borrower. For loans in default, we may repurchase those loans out of the Ginnie Mae security, at which time our advance requirements cease, and we may then modify and resell the loan or assign the loan back to HUD and be reimbursed for our advances. We are not obligated to make advances on the loans we service under the Freddie Mac Optigo® program and our bank and life insurance company servicing agreements.
34
We have risk-sharing obligations on substantially all loans we originate under the Fannie Mae DUS program. When a Fannie Mae DUS loan is subject to full risk-sharing, we absorb losses on the first 5% of the unpaid principal balance of a loan at the time of loss settlement, and above 5% we share a percentage of the loss with Fannie Mae, with our maximum loss capped at 20% of the original unpaid principal balance of the loan (subject to doubling or tripling if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if the loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae). Our full risk-sharing is currently limited to loans up to $300 million, which equates to a maximum loss per loan of $60 million (such exposure would occur in the event that the underlying collateral is determined to be completely without value at the time of loss). For loans in excess of $300 million, we receive modified risk-sharing. We also may request modified risk-sharing at the time of origination on loans below $300 million, which reduces our potential risk-sharing losses from the levels described above if we do not believe that we are being fully compensated for the risks of the transaction. The full risk-sharing limit prior to June 30, 2021 was less than $300 million. Accordingly, loans originated prior to then may have been subject to modified risk-sharing at much lower levels.
Our servicing fees for risk-sharing loans include compensation for the risk-sharing obligations and are larger than the servicing fees we would receive from Fannie Mae for loans with no risk-sharing obligations. We receive a lower servicing fee for modified risk-sharing than for full risk-sharing. For brokered loans we also service, we collect ongoing servicing fees while those loans remain in our servicing portfolio. The servicing fees we typically earn on brokered loan transactions are substantially lower than the servicing fees we earn on Agency loans.
Principal Lending and Investing
Our principal lending and investing operation is composed of the loans held by the Interim Program JV and the Interim Loan Program as described below (collectively the “Interim Program”). Through a joint venture with an affiliate of Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc., we offer short-term senior secured debt financing products that provide floating-rate, interest-only loans for terms of generally up to three years to experienced borrowers seeking to acquire or reposition multifamily properties that do not currently qualify for permanent financing (the “Interim Program JV” or the “joint venture”). The joint venture funds its operations using a combination of equity contributions from its owners and third-party credit facilities. We hold a 15% ownership interest in the Interim Program JV and are responsible for sourcing, underwriting, servicing, and asset-managing the loans originated by the joint venture. The Interim Program JV assumes full risk of loss while the loans it originates are outstanding, while we assume risk commensurate with our 15% ownership interest.
Using a combination of our own capital and warehouse debt financing, we offer interim loans that do not meet the criteria of the Interim Program JV (the “Interim Loan Program”). We underwrite, service, and asset-manage all loans executed through the Interim Loan Program. We originate and hold these Interim Loan Program loans for investment, which are included on our balance sheet, and during the time that these loans are outstanding, we assume the full risk of loss. The ultimate goal of the Interim Loan Program is to provide permanent Agency financing on these transitional properties. We believe third-party capital solutions, in the form of direct real estate investment or commingled funds, are a long-term growth opportunity for our servicing and asset management businesses, and we have steadily reduced our reliance on our own capital and warehouse debt financing to fund interim loans in order to focus on raising third-party capital solutions to meet market demand and pursue our asset management growth strategy.
Affordable Housing and Other Commercial Real Estate-related Investment Management Services
Affordable Housing — We provide affordable housing investment management services through our subsidiary, Alliant Capital, Ltd. and its affiliates (“Alliant”). Alliant is one of the largest tax credit syndicators and affordable housing developers in the U.S. and provides alternative investment management services focused on the affordable housing sector through LIHTC syndication, development of affordable housing projects through joint ventures, and affordable housing preservation fund management. Our affordable housing investment management team works with our developer clients to identify properties that will generate LIHTCs and meet our affordable investors’ needs, and forms limited partnership funds (“LIHTC funds”) with third-party investors that invest in the limited partnership interests in these properties. Alliant serves as the general partner of these LIHTC funds, and it receives fees, such as asset management fees, and a portion of refinance and disposition proceeds as compensation for its work as the general partner of the fund. Additionally, Alliant earns a syndication fee from the LIHTC funds for the identification, organization, and acquisition of affordable housing projects that generate LIHTCs.
We invest, as the managing or non-managing member of joint ventures, with developers of affordable housing projects that generate LIHTCs. These joint ventures earn developer fees and sale/refinance proceeds from the properties they develop, and we receive the portion of the economic benefits commensurate with its investment in the joint ventures. Additionally, Alliant also invests with third-party investors (either in a fund or joint-venture structure) with the goal of preserving affordability on multifamily properties coming out of the LIHTC 15-year compliance period or on which market forces are unlikely to keep the properties affordable. Through these preservation funds, Alliant may receive acquisition and asset management fees and will receive a portion of the operating cash and capital appreciation upon sale through a promote structure.
35
Other Commercial Real Estate — Through our subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop Investment Partners (“WDIP”), we function as the operator of a private commercial real estate investment adviser focused on the management of debt, preferred equity, and mezzanine equity investments in middle-market commercial real estate funds. WDIP’s current assets under management (“AUM”) of $1.3 billion primarily consist of five sources: Fund III, Fund IV, Fund V, and Fund VI (collectively, the “Funds”), and separate accounts managed primarily for life insurance companies. AUM for the Funds and for the separate accounts consists of both unfunded commitments and funded investments. Unfunded commitments are highest during the fundraising and investment phases. WDIP receives management fees based on both unfunded commitments and funded investments. Additionally, with respect to the Funds, WDIP receives a percentage of the return above the fund return hurdle rate specified in the fund agreements.
The Corporate segment consists primarily of our treasury operations and other corporate-level activities. Our treasury operations include monitoring and managing our liquidity and funding requirements, including our corporate debt. The major other corporate-level functions include our equity-method investments, accounting, information technology, legal, human resources, marketing, internal audit, and various other corporate groups.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and all intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), which requires management to make estimates based on certain judgments and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and affect reported amounts. The estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors management believes to be reasonable. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions and the use of different judgments and assumptions may have a material impact on our results. The following critical accounting estimates involve significant estimation uncertainty that may have or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. Additional information about our critical accounting estimates and other significant accounting policies are discussed in NOTE 2 of the consolidated financial statements in our 2022 Form 10-K.
Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”). MSRs are recorded at fair value at loan sale. The fair value at loan sale (“MSR”) is based on estimates of expected net cash flows associated with the servicing rights and takes into consideration an estimate of loan prepayment. Initially, the fair value amount is included as a component of the derivative asset fair value at the loan commitment date. The estimated net cash flows from servicing, which includes assumptions for discount rate, escrow earnings, prepayment speed, and servicing costs, are discounted at a rate that reflects the credit and liquidity risk of the MSR over the estimated life of the underlying loan. The discount rates used throughout the periods presented for all MSRs were between 8-14% and varied based on the loan type. The life of the underlying loan is estimated giving consideration to the prepayment provisions in the loan and assumptions about loan behaviors around those provisions. Our model for MSRs assumes no prepayment prior to the expiration of the prepayment provisions and full prepayment of the loan at or near the point when the prepayment provisions have expired. The estimated net cash flows also include cash flows related to the future earnings on the escrow accounts associated with servicing the loans that are based on an escrow earnings rate assumption. We include a servicing cost assumption to account for our expected costs to service a loan. The servicing cost assumption has had a de minimus impact on the estimate historically. We record an individual MSR asset for each loan at loan sale.
The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of capitalized MSRs are developed internally and are periodically compared to assumptions used by other market participants. Due to the relatively few transactions in the multifamily MSR market and the lack of significant changes in assumptions by market participants, we have experienced limited volatility in the assumptions historically, including the assumption that most significantly impacts the estimate: the discount rate. We do not expect to see significant volatility in the assumptions for the foreseeable future. We actively monitor the assumptions used and make adjustments to those assumptions when market conditions change, or other factors indicate such adjustments are warranted. Over the past two years, we have adjusted the escrow earnings rate assumption several times to reflect the current and expected future earnings rate projected for the life of the MSR. Additionally, we adjusted the discount rate at the beginning of 2021 to mirror changes observed from market participants. We engage a third party to assist in determining an estimated fair value of our existing and outstanding MSRs on at least a semi-annual basis. Changes in our discount rate assumptions may materially impact the fair value of the MSRs (NOTE 3 of the consolidated financial statements details the portfolio-level impact of a change in the discount rate).
36
Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligations. This reserve liability (referred to as “allowance”) for risk-sharing obligations relates to our Fannie Mae at-risk servicing portfolio and is presented as a separate liability on our balance sheets. We record an estimate of the loss reserve for the current expected credit losses (“CECL”) for all loans in our Fannie Mae at-risk servicing portfolio using the weighted-average remaining maturity method (“WARM”). WARM uses an average annual loss rate that contains loss content over multiple vintages and loan terms and is used as a foundation for estimating the CECL reserve. The average annual loss rate is applied to the estimated unpaid principal balance over the contractual term, adjusted for estimated prepayments and amortization to arrive at the CECL reserve for the entire current portfolio as described further below. We currently use one year for our reasonable and supportable forecast period (“forecast period”) as we believe forecasts beyond one year are inherently less reliable. During the forecast period we apply an adjusted loss factor based on economic and unemployment forecasts from a market survey and a blended loss rate from historical periods that we believe reflect the forecast from the survey. We revert to the historical loss rate over a one-year period on a straight-line basis. Over the past couple of years, the loss rate used in the forecast period has been updated to reflect our expectations of the economic conditions over the coming year in relation to the historical period. For example, in the first quarter of 2023, we updated the loss rate used in the forecast period from 2.1 basis points to 2.3 basis points. This change resulted in our forecast-period loss rate increasing from 1.8 times to 3.8 times the historical loss rate factor to reflect our current expectations of the evolving and uncertain macroeconomic conditions facing the multifamily sector. We made multiple revisions to the loss rate used in the forecast period in the past, most notably related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and those changes in the loss rates have significantly impacted the estimate.
One of the key components of a WARM calculation is the runoff rate, which is the expected rate at which loans in the current portfolio will amortize and prepay in the future based on our historical prepayment and amortization experience. We group loans by similar origination dates (vintage) and contractual maturity terms for purposes of calculating the runoff rate. We originate loans under the DUS program with various terms generally ranging from several years to 15 years; each of these various loan terms has a different runoff rate. The runoff rates applied to each vintage and contractual maturity term are determined using historical data; however, changes in prepayment and amortization behavior may significantly impact the estimate. We have not experienced significant changes in the runoff rate since we implemented CECL in 2020.
The weighted-average annual loss rate is calculated using a 10-year look-back period, utilizing the average portfolio balance and settled losses for each year. A 10-year period is used as we believe that this period of time includes sufficiently different economic conditions to generate a reasonable estimate of expected results in the future, given the relatively long-term nature of the current portfolio. As the weighted-average annual loss rate utilizes a rolling 10-year look-back period, the loss rate used in the estimate will change as loss data from earlier periods in the look-back period continue to fall off and as new loss data are added. For example, in the first quarter of 2023, loss data from earlier periods in the look-back period with significantly higher losses fell off and were replaced with more recent loss data with significantly lower losses, resulting in the weighted-average annual loss rate changing from 1.2 basis points to 0.6 basis points. Changes in our expectations and forecasts have materially impacted, and in the future may materially impact, the estimate. In 2022, we had our first loss settlement in six years. We settled another immaterial loss settlement in July 2023.
NOTE 4 of the consolidated financial statements outlines adjustments made in the loss rates used to account for the expected economic conditions as of a given period and the related impact on the estimate.
We evaluate our risk-sharing loans on a quarterly basis to determine whether there are loans that are probable of default. Specifically, we assess a loan’s qualitative and quantitative risk factors, such as payment status, property financial performance, local real estate market conditions, loan-to-value ratio, debt-service-coverage ratio, and property condition. When a loan is determined to be probable of default based on these factors, we remove the loan from the WARM calculation and individually assess the loan for potential credit loss. This assessment requires certain judgments and assumptions to be made regarding the property values and other factors, which may differ significantly from actual results. Loss settlement with Fannie Mae has historically concluded within 18 to 36 months after foreclosure. Historically, the initial collateral-based reserves have not varied significantly from the final settlement.
We actively monitor the judgments and assumptions used in our Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligation estimate and make adjustments to those assumptions when market conditions change, or when other factors indicate such adjustments are warranted. We believe the level of Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligation is appropriate based on our expectations of future market conditions; however, changes in one or more of the judgments or assumptions used above could have a significant impact on the estimate.
Contingent Consideration Liabilities. The Company typically includes an earnout as part of the consideration paid for acquisitions to align the long-term interests of the acquiree with the Company. These earnouts contain milestones for achievement, which typically are revenue, revenue-like, or productivity measurements. If the milestone is achieved, the acquiree is paid the additional consideration. Upon acquisition, the Company is required to estimate the fair value of the earnout and include that fair value measurement as a component of the total
37
consideration paid in the calculation of goodwill. The fair value of the earnout is recorded as a contingent consideration liability and included within Other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and adjusted to the estimated fair value at the end of each reporting period.
The determination of the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities requires significant management judgment and unobservable inputs to (i) determine forecasts and scenarios of future revenues, net cash flows and certain other performance metrics, (ii) assign a probability of achievement for the forecasts and scenarios, and (iii) select a discount rate. A Monte Carlo simulation analysis is used to determine many iterations of potential fair values. The average of these iterations is then used to determine the estimated fair value. We typically obtain the assistance of third-party valuation specialists to assist with the fair value estimation. The probability of the earnout achievement is based on management’s estimate of the expected future performance and other financial metrics of each of the acquired entities, which are subject to significant uncertainty. Changes to the aforementioned inputs impact the estimate; for example, in the fourth quarter of 2022, we recorded a net $13.5 million reduction to the fair value of our contingent consideration liabilities based primarily on revised management forecasts of the financial performance of the entities over the remaining earnout period.
The aggregate fair value of our contingent consideration liabilities as of June 30, 2023 was $175.0 million. This fair value represents management’s best estimate of the discounted cash payments that will be made in the future for all of our contingent consideration arrangements. The maximum remaining undiscounted earnout payments as of June 30, 2023 was $293.3 million. Over the past two years, we have made two large acquisitions that included significant amounts of contingent consideration to maximize alignment of the key principals and management teams. The earnouts completed prior to 2021 involved businesses that operated in our core debt financing business and involved substantially smaller amounts of contingent consideration as compared to the two aforementioned acquisitions.
Goodwill. As of June 30, 2023 and December 31, 2022, we reported goodwill of $963.7 million and $959.7 million, respectively. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit to which the acquisition relates. Goodwill is recognized as an asset and is reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1. Between annual impairment analyses, we perform an evaluation of recoverability, when events and circumstances indicate that it is more-likely-than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying value. Impairment testing requires an assessment of qualitative factors to determine if there are indicators of potential impairment, followed by, if necessary, an assessment of quantitative factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, whether there has been a significant or adverse change in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset and/or significant or adverse changes in cash flow projections or earnings forecasts. These assessments require management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates about projected cash flows, discount rates and other factors. As of June 30, 2023, we continue to believe the goodwill at each of our reporting units is not impaired or at risk of impairment. As discussed below in Overview of Business Environment, the current macroeconomic environment has caused a significant disruption to the commercial real estate sector. As a result, many services supporting the commercial real estate sector have been negatively impacted over the past year, including transaction activity. The commercial real estate market is slowly recovering, and we continue to monitor the performance of our reporting units, including the impact of the decline in transaction volumes and services activity, as part of our ongoing goodwill impairment evaluation.
Overview of Current Business Environment
The current high interest rate environment continues to disrupt many sectors of the capital markets, causing significant volatility and uncertainty, including disruption in the commercial real estate lending environment, which is significantly constraining the supply of capital. Due to this uncertainty, our total transaction volumes decreased 57% from the first half of 2022, with the largest decreases in our debt brokerage (62%) and multifamily property sales (70%). The decrease in total transaction volumes also included a decrease in our GSE lending (28%) and HUD originations (54%).
To combat the high rate of inflation over the past two years the Federal Reserve has increased its target Federal Funds Rate by 5.00% since December 2021, with a target range of 5.00% to 5.25% as of June 30, 2023, with an additional 0.25% increase to 5.25% to 5.50% following its July 2023 meeting. The Federal Reserve held target rates steady at the June 2023 meeting, slowing a constant stream of rate increases dating back to March 2022 and signaling less aggressive rate increases. The actions of the Federal Reserve over the last 17 months has resulted in an increase in medium to long-term mortgage interest rates, which form the basis of most of our lending. The increase in the Federal Funds Rate has increased our earnings on escrow balances and cash and cash equivalents but also increased our borrowing costs for both our warehouse lines and corporate debt.
Additionally, late in the first quarter of 2023 and into the beginning of the second quarter, several regional banks failed and were put in receivership, partially due to the high interest rate environment and volatile economic conditions. The resulting instability in the banking sector compounded the already significant turmoil in the capital markets, resulting in additional pull back by traditional banking capital sources and further constraining commercial real estate transaction activity.
38
As the Federal Reserve continues to combat inflation through higher interest rates and with the turmoil in the banking sector, we expect commercial real estate debt and property sales transaction activity to be depressed in 2023 from the levels we achieved in 2022. Certain of our products were impacted more than others, with property sales volumes and debt brokerage executions in non-multifamily asset classes being impacted the most during the first half of the year, as banks and other third-party capital sources reduced their lending activities significantly and increase capital reserves. We also saw a significant slowdown in lending activity from the GSEs in the first quarter, as overall demand for new loans was down due to the broader macroeconomic uncertainty. However, as the market adjusted, the GSEs saw a 68% increase in their lending activity in the second quarter of 2023 compared to the first quarter of 2023. We expect the GSEs’ lending terms to remain competitive and supply much needed countercyclical capital to the multifamily sector for the rest of 2023, as the GSEs provide liquidity in countercyclical markets, and as GSE lending tends to be more heavily weighted towards the end of the year. When the broader capital markets tighten, the GSEs historically increase their lending activity to provide liquidity to the multifamily borrowing community as they did throughout 2020 and the second half of 2021. As the largest GSE multifamily lender by volume in 2022, we are well positioned to originate loans for the GSEs in 2023. As interest rates increased rapidly over the last year, and liquidity in the capital markets tightened, we have experienced declines in credit spreads to offset a portion of the interest rate increases on the total cost of borrowing. This has resulted in lower average servicing fees on our new GSE lending over the past year. Although our lending activity with the GSEs is expected to remain relatively stable for the remainder of 2023, we expect the servicing fees on new loans and associated profitability of those executions to remain consistent with levels experienced in the second half of 2022 and lower than long-term historical levels.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) establishes loan origination caps for both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac each year. In November 2022, the FHFA established Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s 2023 loan origination caps at $75 billion each for all multifamily business, a 4% decrease from the 2022 caps, but an increase over actual 2022 lending volumes for both Agencies. During the three months ended June 30, 2023, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had multifamily origination volumes of $15.0 billion and $12.8 billion, respectively, down 19.8% and 12.9%, respectively, from the same period in 2022. During the six months ended June 30, 2023, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had multifamily origination volumes of $25.2 billion and $19.1 billion, respectively, down 27.4% and 35.5%, from the first half of 2022, respectively, leaving a combined $105.7 billion of available lending capacity for the remainder of 2023. A decline in our GSE originations negatively impacts our financial results, as our non-cash MSR revenues decrease disproportionately with debt financing volume and future servicing revenue would be constrained or decline.
Despite the higher interest rate environment and declines in commercial real estate lending and property sales, macroeconomic conditions impacting multifamily property fundamentals remained healthy in the second quarter of 2023, with the national unemployment rate remaining low at 3.6% as of June 2023. According to RealPage, a provider of commercial real estate data and analytics, vacancies have risen from their historical low of 2.4% in February 2022 and stabilized at 5.3% as of June 2023. The recent historically low vacancy rates were largely considered to be unsustainable form a long-term perspective, and the current vacancy rate represents a return to normal that matches the pre-pandemic decade-long average.
Our multifamily property sales volumes decreased 70% in the first half of 2023. We continue to compete for market share in the multifamily property sales sector, as customers increasingly look to experienced brokers to maximize value in this uncertain environment. Long term, we believe the market fundamentals will continue to be positive for multifamily properties, and we are beginning to see an increase in assets brought to market as we enter the second half of the year. Over the last several years, household formation and a dearth of supply of entry-level single-family homes led to strong demand for rental housing in many geographical areas. Consequently, the fundamentals of the multifamily assets were strong prior to the pandemic, and, when combined with high occupancy and elevated real-estate prices, we expect that market demand for multifamily assets in the long-term will return as this asset class remains an attractive investment option.
Our debt brokerage platform had lower volumes this quarter compared to the first half of 2022 due to the volatile interest rate environment and constrained supply of capital from banks, securitization markets, and other specialty finance lenders. As the interest rate environment and banking sector begin to stabilize, we expect capital to slowly return to the market.
As noted above, our debt financing operations with HUD declined compared to the first half of 2022. HUD loan volumes accounted for 2.1% and 2.3% of our total debt financing volumes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, compared to 1.4% and 2.5% of our total debt financing volumes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, respectively. The decline in HUD debt financing volumes as a percentage of our total debt financing volumes was driven by lower aggregate HUD lending volumes industry-wide, as the ongoing high interest-rate environment discussed above more acutely impacted the HUD product given the longer lead times associated with HUD executions.
We entered into the Interim Program JV to expand our capacity to originate Interim Program loans beyond the use of our own balance sheet. Demand for transitional lending was strong over the last several years and drove increased competition from lenders, specifically banks, private debt funds, mortgage real estate investment trusts, and life insurance companies. Since the Federal Reserve began increasing interest
39
rates a year and a half ago, the supply of capital to transitional lending decreased substantially due to constraints in lending from banks, as well as tightening credit standards for transitional assets. For the six months ended June 30, 2023, we did not originate any Interim Program JV loans, compared to $86.3 million of originations for the same period last year. Given the volatile macroeconomic conditions discussed above we continue to approach our lending activity on transitional assets cautiously. We expect our lending volumes for transitional assets to remain low until economic conditions normalize. Except for one loan that defaulted in early 2019, the loans in our portfolio and in the Interim Program JV continue to perform according to their terms.
Our subsidiary, Alliant, which provides alternative investment management services focused on the affordable housing sector through LIHTC syndication, joint venture development, and community preservation fund management remains the 6th largest LIHTC syndicator despite the economic challenges mentioned above. We continue to approach the affordable housing space with a combined LIHTC syndication and affordable housing service offering that we believe will generate significant long-term financing, property sales, and syndication opportunities. Additionally, as part of FHFA’s 2023 loan origination caps of $150 billion announced in November 2022, at least 50% of the GSEs’ multifamily business is required to be targeted towards affordable housing. We expect these initiatives will create additional growth opportunities for both Alliant and our debt financing and property sales teams focused on affordable housing, as evidenced by the $407 million of equity syndicated by Alliant for the six months ended June 30, 2023, putting them on pace for their strongest year of syndicated equity ever.
Consolidated Results of Operations
The following is a discussion of our consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022. The financial results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Our quarterly results have fluctuated in the past and are expected to fluctuate in the future, reflecting the interest rate environment, the volume of transactions, business acquisitions, regulatory actions, industry trends, and general economic conditions. The table below provides supplemental data regarding our financial performance.
SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATING DATA
CONSOLIDATED
(dollars in thousands; except per share data)
Transaction Volume:
Components of Debt Financing Volume
Total Debt Financing Volume
6,907,835
14,650,958
11,733,633
23,785,975
Property Sales Volume
1,504,383
7,892,062
3,399,065
11,423,752
Total Transaction Volume
8,412,218
22,543,020
15,132,698
35,209,727
Key Performance Metrics:
Operating margin
%
Return on equity
Adjusted EBITDA(1)
70,501
94,844
138,476
157,480
Key Expense Metrics (as a percentage of total revenues):
Personnel expenses
49
47
As of June 30,
Managed Portfolio:
Total Servicing Portfolio
126,646,181
119,021,507
Assets under management
16,903,055
16,692,556
Total Managed Portfolio
143,549,236
135,714,063
40
The following tables present period-to-period comparisons of our financial results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.
FINANCIAL RESULTS – THREE MONTHS
Dollar
Percentage
Change
(37,637)
(37)
(9,891)
(19)
2,801
(36,041)
(78)
123
(6,794)
(129)
28,635
424
(9,429)
(25)
(68,233)
(20)
(35,063)
(21)
(4,811)
(8)
4,106
(85)
10,598
165
(5,465)
(15)
(30,635)
(11)
(37,598)
(51)
(9,012)
(46)
(28,586)
(1,935)
1,081
(26,651)
(49)
41
FINANCIAL RESULTS – SIX MONTHS
(72,863)
(39)
(32,608)
(31)
5,886
(47,815)
(69)
438
(11,566)
(115)
57,756
675
(48,159)
(148,931)
(23)
(60,631)
(3,997)
(3)
2,829
19,467
152
(13,616)
(55,948)
(92,983)
(57)
(21,337)
(55)
(71,646)
(451)
53
(71,195)
Three months ended June 30, 2023 compared to three months ended June 30, 2022
The decrease in revenues was primarily driven by decreases in loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net (“origination fees”), the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net (“MSR income”), property sales broker fees, net warehouse interest income, and other revenues, partially offset by increases in escrow earnings and other interest income and servicing fees. Origination fees and MSR income decreased largely as a result of a 52% decline in overall debt financing volume. Property sales broker fees decreased primarily due to an 81% decline in property sales volume. Net warehouse interest income decreased from short-term rates remaining higher than long-term rates (“inverted yield curve”) during the second quarter of 2023. Other revenues decreased primarily due to a decline in prepayment fees. Escrow earnings and other interest income increased primarily as a result of a higher escrow earnings rate due to rising short-term interest rates. Servicing fees increased largely from an increase in the average servicing portfolio outstanding.
The decrease in expenses was due to decreases in personnel costs, amortization and depreciation expense, and other operating expenses, partially offset by an increase in interest expense on corporate debt and a decrease in benefit for credit losses. Personnel costs decreased largely due to decreases in commission costs as a result of our lower transaction volumes. Amortization and depreciation expense decreased primarily due to a decline in write-offs of MSRs due to lower prepayments in the servicing portfolio. Other operating expenses decreased as a direct result of our cost reduction initiatives across a variety of general and administrative cost categories. Interest expense on corporate debt increased due to (i) an increase in interest rates as our corporate debt’s floating rate is tied to short-term interest rates, (ii) an increase in the outstanding principal balance of corporate debt, and (iii) an increase in the principal balance of our corporate debt subject to floating interest rates, as we replaced the fixed-rate debt at one of our subsidiaries with a floating-rate debt. The decrease in the benefit for credit losses was primarily due to a decrease in the forecast-period loss rate during the three months ended June 30, 2022 with no comparable activity for the three months ended June 30, 2023.
42
Income Tax Expense. The decrease in income tax expense primarily relates to a 51% decrease in income from operations, partially offset by a $0.4 million decrease in realizable excess tax benefits.
Six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to six months ended June 30, 2022
The decrease in revenues was primarily driven by decreases in origination fees, MSR income, property sales broker fees, net warehouse interest income, and other revenues, partially offset by increases in servicing fees and escrow earnings and other interest income. Origination fees and MSR income decreased largely as a result of a 50% decline in overall debt financing volume. Property sales broker fees decreased primarily due to a 70% decline in property sales volume. Net warehouse interest income decreased due to the substantially inverted yield curve throughout 2023. Servicing fees increased largely from an increase in the average servicing portfolio outstanding. Escrow earnings and other interest income increased primarily as a result of a higher escrow earnings rate due to rising short-term interest rates. Other revenues decreased primarily due to a $39.6 million one-time gain from the revaluation of our previously held equity-method investment in Apprise in the first quarter of 2022, with no comparable activity in 2023, combined with a decline in prepayment fees.
The decrease in expenses was due to decreases in personnel costs, amortization and depreciation, and other operating expenses, partially offset by an increase in interest expense on corporate debt and a decrease in benefit for credit losses. Personnel costs decreased largely due to decreases in commission costs as a result of our lower transaction volumes and bonus and share-based compensation accruals due to our financial performance, partially offset by an increase in salaries expense as we had personnel expenses from an acquisition for only a portion of the first quarter of 2022. Other operating expenses decreased primarily as a result of the write off of unamortized debt premium as we paid off a note payable at one of our subsidiaries, and other decreases as a result of our cost reduction initiatives. The decrease in the benefit for credit losses was primarily due to a reduction in the forecast-period loss rate in the second quarter of 2022 as we removed the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic from our forecast-period loss rate and made no comparable adjustments to the forecast-period loss rate in 2023. Interest expense on corporate debt increased due to (i) an increase in interest rates as our corporate debt’s floating rate is tied to short-term interest rates, (ii) an increase in the outstanding principal balance of corporate debt, and (iii) an increase in the principal balance of our corporate debt subject to floating interest rates, as we replaced the fixed-rate debt at one of our subsidiaries with a floating-rate debt.
Income Tax Expense. The decrease in income tax expense primarily relates to a 57% decrease in income from operations.
A discussion of the financial results for our segments is included further below.
Non-GAAP Financial Measure
To supplement our financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, we use adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure. The presentation of adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. When analyzing our operating performance, readers should use adjusted EBITDA in addition to, and not as an alternative for, net income. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before income taxes, interest expense on our corporate debt, and amortization and depreciation, adjusted for provision (benefit) for credit losses, net write-offs, stock-based incentive compensation charges, the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net, the write off of the unamortized balance of premium associated with the repayment of a portion of our corporate debt, and the gain from revaluation of a previously held equity-method investment. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Furthermore, adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for our management’s discretionary use, as it does not reflect certain cash requirements such as tax and debt service payments. The amounts shown for adjusted EBITDA may also differ from the amounts calculated under similarly titled definitions in our debt instruments, which are further adjusted to reflect certain other cash and non-cash charges that are used to determine compliance with financial covenants.
We use adjusted EBITDA to evaluate the operating performance of our business, for comparison with forecasts and strategic plans, and for benchmarking performance externally against competitors. We believe that this non-GAAP measure, when read in conjunction with our GAAP financials, provides useful information to investors by offering:
We believe that adjusted EBITDA has limitations in that it does not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP and that adjusted EBITDA should only be used to evaluate our results of operations in conjunction with net income on both a consolidated and segment basis. Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to net income as follows:
ADJUSTED FINANCIAL MEASURE RECONCILIATION TO GAAP
Reconciliation of Walker & Dunlop Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA
Walker & Dunlop Net Income
Net write-offs(1)
Share-based compensation expense
7,898
10,329
15,041
21,608
Write off of unamortized premium from corporate debt repayment
(4,420)
(42,058)
(51,949)
Adjusted EBITDA
The following tables present period-to-period comparisons of the components of adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.
ADJUSTED EBITDA – THREE MONTHS
30,128
37,622
(7,494)
(125,407)
(158,039)
32,632
(30,730)
(36,195)
5,465
(24,343)
(26)
44
ADJUSTED EBITDA – SIX MONTHS
57,484
65,551
(8,067)
(12)
(236,877)
(290,941)
54,064
(59,213)
(68,409)
9,196
(13)
(19,004)
Three and six months ended June 30, 2023 compared to three and six months ended June 30, 2022
Origination fees decreased primarily due to declines in overall debt financing volumes. Servicing fees increased largely due to growth in the average servicing portfolio period over period. Property sales broker fees decreased principally due to declines in property sales volumes. Net warehouse interest income decreased primarily due to the inverted yield curve throughout much of 2023. Escrow earnings and other interest income increased largely as a result of higher escrow earnings rates due to rising short-term interest rates. Other revenues decreased primarily due to declines in prepayment fees. The decreases in personnel expenses were primarily due to decreases in commission costs due to our lower transaction volumes and, for the six-month period only, a decrease in performance-based compensation accruals, partially offset by increases in salaries and benefits costs driven by an increase in the average headcount. Net write-offs increased due to the first-ever charge off related to the Interim Program for a loan that defaulted in 2019 that was settled in the second quarter of 2023. Other operating expenses decreased largely as a result of decreases in travel and entertainment costs and professional fees as a result of our cost reduction initiatives.
Financial Condition
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our cash flows from operating activities are generated from loan sales, servicing fees, escrow earnings, net warehouse interest income, property sales broker fees, investment management fees, research subscription fees, investment banking advisory fees, and other income, net of loan originations and operating costs. Our cash flows from operations are impacted by the fees generated by our loan originations and property sales, the timing of loan closings, and the period of time loans are held for sale in the warehouse loan facility prior to delivery to the investor.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
We usually lease facilities and equipment for our operations. Our cash flows from investing activities also include the funding and repayment of loans held for investment, contributions to and distributions from joint ventures, purchases of equity-method investments, and the purchase of available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities pledged to Fannie Mae. We opportunistically invest cash for acquisitions.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
We use our warehouse loan facilities and, when necessary, our corporate cash to fund loan closings, both for loans held for sale and loans held for investment. We also use warehouse facilities to assist in funding investments in tax credit equity before transferring them to a tax credit fund. We believe that our current warehouse loan facilities are adequate to meet our loan origination needs. Historically, we have used a combination of long-term debt and cash on hand to fund large acquisitions. Additionally, we repurchase shares, pay cash dividends, make long-term debt principal payments, and repay short-term borrowings on a regular basis. We issue stock primarily in connection with the exercise of stock options (cash inflow) and for acquisitions (non-cash transactions).
45
Six Months Ended June 30, 2023 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2022
The following table presents a period-to-period comparison of the significant components of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.
SIGNIFICANT COMPONENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(1,734,900)
(203)
224,544
(197)
1,733,383
Total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, and restricted cash equivalents at end of period ("Total cash")
88,130
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities
Net receipt (use) of cash for loan origination activity
(901,749)
832,200
(1,733,949)
(208)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, excluding loan origination activity
20,718
21,669
(951)
(4)
Cash flows from (used in) investing activities
Purchases of pledged AFS securities
46,395
(100)
(3,202)
78,465
Net payoff of (investment in) loans held for investment
129,017
22,443
106,574
475
Net distributions from (investments in) joint ventures
6,319
(4,795)
(76)
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
1,728,598
(209)
(65,586)
252
(96,802)
456
(8,078)
46
21,323
(54)
The change to net cash used in operating activities from net cash provided by operating activities was driven primarily by loans originated and sold. Such loans are held for short periods of time, generally less than 60 days, and impact cash flows presented as of a point in time due to the timing difference between the date of origination and date of delivery. The increase in cash flows used in loan origination activities is primarily attributable to originations outpacing sales by $901.8 million in 2023 compared to sales outpacing originations by $832.2 million in 2022. Originations outpaced sales in 2023 primarily due to the timing of delivery of our loans held for sale, as we held a larger balance of loans held for sale as of June 30, 2023 compared to June 30, 2022. Excluding cash used for the origination and sale of loans, cash flows used in operating activities were $20.7 million in 2023, down immaterially from 2022.
The change from net cash used in investing activities in 2022 to net cash provided by investing activities in 2023 was due to decreases in (i) a significant reduction in cash used for acquisitions in 2023 compared to 2022, as we had no acquisitions in 2023, (ii) a decrease in the purchase of AFS securities, which was impacted by the elevated payoffs of pledged AFS securities leading up to 2022, and (iii) an increase in net payoff of loans held for investment in 2023 due to contractual maturities and the refinancing of these transitional bridge loans to permanent debt structures.
The change from cash used in financing activities in 2022 to cash provided by financing activities in 2023 was attributable to (i) an increase in net warehouse borrowings due to the aforementioned loan origination activity, (ii) an increase in borrowings of notes payable, and (iii) a decrease in repurchases of common stock, partially offset by (a) an increase in repayments of notes payable, (b) an increase in payments of contingent consideration as the Company made the first payment related to the Alliant acquisition in 2023, and (c) an increase in repayments of interim warehouse notes payable. The increase in borrowings of notes payable was due to borrowings under our Incremental Term Loan (defined in Liquidity and Capital Resources below), a portion of which was used to repay notes payable at one of our subsidiaries, resulting in an increase in the repayments of notes payable. The decrease in repurchase of common stock was related to a decrease in the number and value of employee stock vesting events related to previously issued equity grants under our various share-based compensation plans due to both our
financial performance and the substantially lower stock price at which these vesting events occurred. The increase in repayments of interim warehouse notes payable was due to an increase in payoffs of loans funded with warehouse borrowings year over year.
The Company is managed based on our three reportable segments: (i) Capital Markets, (ii) Servicing & Asset Management, and (iii) Corporate. The segment results below are intended to present each of the reportable segments on a stand-alone basis.
CAPITAL MARKETS
(in thousands; except per share data)
Fannie Mae
2,230,952
3,918,400
(1,687,448)
(43)
Freddie Mac
1,212,887
1,141,034
71,853
Ginnie Mae ̶ HUD
147,773
201,483
(53,710)
(27)
Brokered(1)
3,316,223
9,258,490
(5,942,267)
(64)
14,519,407
(7,611,572)
(52)
Property sales volume
(6,387,679)
(81)
22,411,469
(13,999,251)
(62)
Net income
(34,152)
(68)
Adjusted EBITDA(2)
(10,334)
22,830
(33,164)
(145)
Key Revenue Metrics (as a percentage of debt financing volume):
Origination fees
0.93
0.71
MSR income
0.61
0.36
MSR income, as a percentage of Agency debt financing volume
1.17
0.99
3,589,660
5,916,774
(2,327,114)
2,188,624
2,128,883
59,741
275,372
593,176
(317,804)
5,679,977
14,901,571
(9,221,594)
23,540,404
(11,806,771)
(50)
(8,024,687)
(70)
34,964,156
(19,831,458)
(76,750)
(82)
(29,021)
31,364
(60,385)
(193)
0.95
0.78
0.44
1.19
1.21
(37,511)
Net warehouse interest income, loans held for sale
(6,459)
(174)
269
(89,633)
(42)
(45,649)
(33)
3,192
208
(673)
(43,124)
(29)
(46,509)
(11,927)
(34,582)
(430)
(66)
48
(72,378)
(11,678)
(161)
10,033
(154,446)
(40)
(60,146)
1,136
100
5,938
194
(2,230)
(17)
(55,302)
(99,144)
(80)
(23,334)
(79)
(75,810)
940
131
Loan origination and debt brokerage fees, net (“origination fees”) and Fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net (“MSR income”). The following tables provide additional information that helps explain changes in origination fees and MSR income period over period:
Debt Financing Volume by Product Type
Brokered
64
63
Mortgage Banking Details (basis points)
Origination Fee Rate (1)
93
71
95
78
Basis Point Change
Percentage Change
MSR Rate (2)
61
Agency MSR Rate (3)
117
99
119
121
(2)
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, the decreases in origination fees were primarily the result of a 52% and 50% decrease in segment debt financing volume, respectively, partially offset by a 22-basis-point and 17-basis-point increase in our origination fee rate, respectively. The increases in the origination fee rate were driven by increases in Agency debt financing volume as a percentage of total debt financing volume as seen above. Agency loans have higher origination fees than brokered loans. Additionally, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, our Fannie Mae debt financing volumes included a $1.9 billion Fannie Mae loan portfolio, for which we received a much lower origination fee than is typical for individual loans.
For the three months ended June 30, 2023, the decrease in MSR income was attributable to a 32% decrease in Agency debt financing volume, partially offset by an 18 basis-point increase in our Agency MSR Rate seen above. The increase in the Agency MSR Rate was primarily the result of an increase in the weighted-average servicing fee (“WASF”) for Fannie Mae debt financing volume. The increase in WASF was related to a $1.9 billion Fannie Mae portfolio that closed in the second quarter of 2022, which had a very low servicing fee rate that is typical of such a portfolio. There was no comparable portfolio in 2023. For non-portfolio Fannie Mae debt financing volume, the WASF was lower in 2023 than 2022.
For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the decrease in MSR income was attributable to a 30% decrease in Agency debt financing volume and a two-basis point decrease in our Agency MSR Rate seen above. Our Agency MSR Rate decreased primarily due to a decrease in the servicing fee rate on our Agency debt financing volumes in 2023 compared to 2022. In 2023, our Fannie Mae and HUD volumes represented a smaller share of our Agency debt financing volumes, resulting in the lower servicing fee rate and Agency MSR Rate. Our Fannie Mae and HUD products are our most profitable products. Additionally, the impact on WASF for the portfolio noted above for the three-month period also impacted the six-month period. However, the positive impact it had on the Agency MSR rate for the three-month period was offset by a decrease in the WASF on Fannie Mae debt financing volume from the first quarter of 2022 to the first quarter of 2023.
See the “Overview of Current Business Environment” section above for a detailed discussion of the factors driving the change in debt financing volumes and weighted average servicing fees.
Property sales broker fees. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, the decrease in property sales broker fees was driven principally by the 81% and 70% decreases, respectively, in the property sales volumes period over period.
See the “Overview of Current Business Environment” section above for a detailed discussion of the factors driving the change in property sales volume.
Net warehouse interest income. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, the decreases in net warehouse interest income were primarily attributable to an inverted yield curve during 2023, partially offset by a lower average balance of loans held for sale. Short-term interest rates, upon which we incur interest expense, were higher than the long-term mortgage rates, upon which we earn interest income, during 2023. Partially reducing the effect of the inverted yield curve and resulting negative net spread shown below was the lower average balance of loans held for sale outstanding in 2023 compared to 2022, which was driven by a reduction in the number of days loans were held before delivery and the lower debt financing volumes.
Net Warehouse Interest Income Details (dollars in thousands)
Average LHFS Outstanding Balance
671,088
1,544,158
603,345
1,345,020
Dollar Change
(873,070)
(741,675)
LHFS Net Spread (basis points)
(164)
96
(147)
108
(260)
(255)
(271)
(236)
Other Revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the increase was due to a $6.5 million increase in investment banking revenues and smaller increases in various other revenues categories. The increase in investment banking revenues was primarily due to the closing of the largest investment banking advisory transaction in Company history.
50
Personnel. For the three months ended June 30, 2023, the decrease was primarily the result of a $44.1 million decrease in commission costs due to lower origination fees and property sales broker fees noted above.
For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the decrease was primarily the result of a $64.2 million decrease in commission costs due to lower origination fees and property sales broker fees, partially offset by a $4.0 million increase in salaries and other compensation costs due to an increase in average headcount prior to the aforementioned workforce reduction.
Interest expense on corporate debt. Interest expense on corporate debt is determined at a consolidated corporate level and allocated to each segment proportionally based on each segment’s use of that corporate debt. The discussion of our consolidated results above has additional information related to the increase in interest expense on corporate debt.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense is determined at a consolidated corporate level and allocated to each segment proportionally based on each segment’s income from operations, except for significant, one-time tax activities, which are allocated entirely to the segment impacted by the tax activity.
A reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA for our CM segment is presented below. Our segment-level adjusted EBITDA represents the segment portion of consolidated adjusted EBITDA. A detailed description and reconciliation of consolidated adjusted EBITDA is provided above in our Consolidated Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Financial Measure. CM adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to net income as follows:
Reconciliation of Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA
Net Income
4,229
4,403
9,092
9,075
MSR Income
The following tables present period-to-period comparisons of the components of CM adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.
11,537
10,838
699
(88,838)
(134,313)
45,475
(34)
(5,200)
(5,873)
673
51
27,202
18,109
9,093
(174,437)
(234,600)
60,163
(10,844)
(13,074)
2,230
Origination fees decreased due to a decrease in our overall debt financing volume, partially offset by an increase in our origination fee rate. Property sales broker fees decreased as a result of the decline in property sales volumes. Net warehouse interest income decreased due to the inverted yield curve. The decrease in personnel expense was primarily due to decreased commission costs due to the decrease in origination fees and property sales broker fees.
Origination fees decreased due to a decrease in our overall debt financing volume, partially offset by an increase in our origination fee rate. Property sales broker fees decreased as a result of the decline in property sales volumes. Net warehouse interest income decreased primarily due to the inverted yield curve. Other revenues increased due to increased investment banking revenues. The decrease in personnel expense was primarily due to decreased commission costs due to the decrease in origination fees and property sales broker fees, partially offset by growth in salaries and other compensation costs.
SERVICING & ASSET MANAGEMENT
Components of Servicing Portfolio
61,356,554
57,122,414
4,234,140
38,287,200
36,886,666
1,400,534
Ginnie Mae - HUD
10,246,632
9,570,012
676,620
Brokered (1)
16,684,115
15,190,315
1,493,800
Principal Lending and Investing (2)
71,680
252,100
(180,420)
(72)
7,624,674
210,499
7,835,173
Key Volume and Performance Metrics:
Equity syndication volume(3)
271,181
296,767
(25,586)
Principal Lending and Investing debt financing volume(4)
131,551
(131,551)
2,365
Adjusted EBITDA(5)
108,459
103,371
5,088
52
407,094
361,290
45,804
245,571
(245,571)
25,376
221,434
189,607
31,827
Key Servicing Portfolio Metrics:
Custodial escrow account balance (in billions)
2.8
Weighted-average servicing fee rate (basis points)
24.3
24.9
Weighted-average remaining servicing portfolio term (years)
8.6
8.9
Components of assets under management (in thousands)
LIHTC
14,678,229
14,495,126
Investment funds
1,329,335
1,298,143
Interim Program JV Managed Loans
895,491
899,287
Total assets under management
(126)
(24)
Net warehouse interest income, loans held for investment
(335)
25,689
386
(10,267)
17,885
3,370
(4,919)
6,179
136
4,677
89
13,413
4,472
3,612
Income before noncontrolling interests
860
(1,505)
181
54
(485)
(48)
112
52,755
628
(14,118)
44,588
2,047
(5,802)
(5)
11,225
124
1,128
11,427
33,161
9,176
23,985
(1,391)
88
Servicing Fees. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, the increases were primarily attributable to increases in the average servicing portfolio period over period as shown below, slightly offset by declines in the average servicing fee rates. The increases in the average servicing portfolio was driven by the $4.2 billion and $1.4 billion increases in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans serviced, respectively. The decreases in the average servicing fee rates were the result of decreases in the weighted-average servicing fees on our new originations over the past year as the volatility in the interest rate environment compressed the spread on our originations and reduced the servicing fee rates on loans originated in 2023.
Servicing Fees Details (dollars in thousands)
Average Servicing Portfolio
125,351,124
117,628,010
124,596,933
116,972,088
7,723,114
7,624,845
Average Servicing Fee (basis points)
24.4
(0.6)
(0.5)
Escrow earnings and other interest income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, the increases were driven primarily by increases in our earnings on escrow balances of $24.0 million and $48.9 million, respectively, coupled with increases in interest income from our pledged securities investments of $1.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively. The earnings rates on escrow balances increased significantly as a result of the higher short-term interest rate environment in 2023 compared to same period in 2022. Additionally, the average escrow balances increased slightly, contributing to the increase in escrow earnings.
55
Other Revenues. For the three months ended June 30, 2023, the decrease was primarily due to a $7.9 million decline in prepayment fees, combined with a $1.7 million decrease in syndication fees from our LIHTC operations. Prepayment fees declined significantly as a result of rapidly rising interest rates over the past year, which reduces both the volume of loans prepaying and the amount of prepayment fees we receive on loans that have prepaid. We expect this trend of low prepayment fees to continue for the foreseeable future. Syndication fees from our LIHTC operations declined due to a lower volume of capital syndicated into our LIHTC funds (as shown above in Key Volume and Performance Metrics section), coupled with a lower average syndication fee rate.
For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the decrease was primarily due to a $15.0 million decline in prepayment fees and small declines in various other revenues, partially offset by an increase in syndication fees from our LIHTC operations. The decrease in prepayment fees was due to the aforementioned reduction in the volume of loans prepaying and the amount of prepayment fees. Syndication fees increased slightly due to the higher volume of capital syndicated into our LIHTC funds.
Personnel. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, the increases were due to increases in commission costs, combined with a small increase in salaries, partially offset by decreases in stock compensation and, for the six months only, subjective bonuses. The increases in commission costs were due to an increase in fees earned that are subject to commission payments. The increases in salaries were due to small increases in average headcount in the segment. Subjective bonuses and stock compensation decreased due to our overall financial performance.
Provision (benefit) for credit losses. For the three months ended June 30, 2023, the benefit for credit losses was driven by an update in our collateral-based reserve for a property that was settled with Fannie Mae in July 2023. For the three months ended June 30, 2022, the benefit for credit losses was a result of a decrease in the forecast-period loss rate from 3.0 basis points as of March 31, 2022 to 2.2 basis points as of June 30, 2022, compared to no change in the forecast-period loss rate during the second quarter of 2023.
For the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022, the benefits for credit losses were primarily due to the impact of updating our historical loss rate factor that is based on a 10-year rolling period. The updates resulted in the loss data from earlier periods within the historical lookback period falling off and being replaced with a period with significantly lower loss data, resulting in the historical loss rate decreasing by 0.6 basis points for both the six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022. During 2023, we also updated the loss rate used in the forecast period from 2.1 basis points as of December 31, 2022 to 2.3 basis points as of March 31, 2023, resulting in the forecast-period loss rate increasing from 1.8 times to 3.8 times the historical loss rate factor reflecting our current expectations of the evolving and uncertain macroeconomic conditions facing the multifamily sector. Additionally, the change in forecast-period loss rate for the three-month period impacted the six-month period.
Other Operating Expenses. For the three months ended June 30, 2023, the increase was due to increases in professional fees and various other operating expenses. Professional fees increased primarily due to consulting fees. For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the increase primarily stemmed from the aforementioned increases in professional fees and various other operating expenses, partially offset by a $4.4 million write-off of debt premium related to the payoff of fixed-rate debt.
A reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA for our SAM segment is presented below. Our segment-level adjusted EBITDA represents the segment portion of consolidated adjusted EBITDA. A detailed description and reconciliation of consolidated adjusted EBITDA is provided above in our Consolidated Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Financial Measure. SAM adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to net income as follows:
56
450
672
840
1,364
The following tables present period-to-period comparisons of the components of SAM adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.
17,850
26,612
(8,762)
(20,739)
(17,147)
(3,592)
Net write-offs
(9,946)
(5,269)
(4,677)
30,095
42,822
(12,727)
(30)
(35,690)
(33,119)
(2,571)
(15,846)
(10,298)
(5,548)
57
Servicing fees increased due to growth in the average servicing portfolio period over period as a result of loan originations, partially offset by a decrease in the average servicing fee rate. Escrow earnings and other interest income increased primarily due to increases in escrow earnings rates. Other revenues decreased primarily due to decreases in prepayment fees. Personnel expense increased due to increases in commission costs. Net write-offs increased due to the first-ever charge off of a loan originated through our Interim Program that defaulted in 2019, as the underlying collateral was sold during the second quarter of 2023. Other operating expenses increased due to professional fees and various other expense categories.
CORPORATE
Other interest income
2,946
2,860
569
331
3,515
1,278
7,216
102
1,227
352
(9,469)
(38)
(924)
4,439
(697)
5,136
(18)
(27,624)
(31,357)
3,733
5,001
3,379
(44,074)
(39,073)
(88)
(2,532)
(7)
669
2,304
332
(12,514)
(28)
(12,073)
(27,000)
70
(7,179)
(19,821)
68
(53,937)
(63,491)
9,554
58
Other interest income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, the increases were due to increases in the interest rates we earn on our cash deposits held by our Corporate segment.
Other Revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the decrease was primarily due to the $39.6 million gain from revaluation of previously held equity-method investment, which was a one-time transaction recognized in 2022, and a $5.2 million decrease in income from equity-method investments.
Personnel. For the three months ended June 30, 2023, the increase was primarily due to a $5.6 million increase in accruals for performance-based and subjective bonuses and a $2.4 million increase in deferred compensation costs, partially offset by a $2.0 million decrease in stock compensation expense due to our financial performance. The increase in subjective bonuses was due to a lower bonus expense in the second quarter of 2022 compared to the second quarter of 2023 resulting primarily from our financial performance.
For the six months ended June 30, 2023, the decrease was primarily the result of a $2.3 million decrease in performance-based and subjective bonuses, and a $6.1 million decrease in stock compensation expense related to our performance share plan, both due to company performance. Partially offsetting the decreases was a $2.5 million increase in salaries and benefits due to an increase in the average headcount and a $3.3 million increase in deferred compensation expense.
Other Operating Expenses. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, the decreases were primarily driven by decreases in professional fees, miscellaneous expenses, and various other operating expenses categories. Professional fees decreased $2.6 million and $6.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively. The decreases in professional fees were primarily due to elevated professional fees in 2022 related to acquisition costs. Miscellaneous expenses decreased $4.9 million and $5.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023, respectively, primarily due to our cost containment efforts.
59
A reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA for our Corporate segment is presented below. Our segment-level adjusted EBITDA represents the segment portion of consolidated adjusted EBITDA. A detailed description and reconciliation of consolidated adjusted EBITDA is provided above in our Consolidated Results of Operations—Non-GAAP Financial Measure. Corporate adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to net income as follows:
3,219
5,254
5,109
11,169
The following tables present period-to-period comparisons of the components of Corporate adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2023 and 2022.
(15,830)
(6,579)
(9,251)
141
(15,584)
(25,053)
9,469
4,620
(4,433)
(96)
(26,750)
(23,222)
(3,528)
(32,523)
(45,037)
12,514
Other interest income increased primarily due to an increase in the interest rates on our cash deposits. The increase in personnel expense was primarily due lower performance-based and subjective bonus expenses in the second quarter of 2022 than the second quarter of 2023 due to our financial performance. Other operating expenses decreased as a result of declines in professional fees and other operating expenses.
60
Other interest income increased primarily due to an increase in interest earned on our cash deposits. Other revenues decreased due to a decrease in income from equity-method investments. The increase in personnel expense was primarily due to an increase in salaries and benefits and deferred compensation expense, partially offset by a decrease in performance-based and subjective bonus expense due to our financial performance. Other operating expenses decreased as a result of a decline in professional fees and other operating expenses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Uses of Liquidity, Cash and Cash Equivalents
Our significant recurring cash flow requirements consist of liquidity to (i) fund loans held for sale; (ii) pay cash dividends; (iii) fund our portion of the equity necessary for the operations of the Interim Program JV, and other equity-method investments; (iv) fund investments in properties to be syndicated to LIHTC investment funds that we will asset-manage; (v) make payments related to earnouts from acquisitions, (vi) meet working capital needs to support our day-to-day operations, including debt service payments, joint venture development partnerships contributions, servicing advances and payments for salaries, commissions, and income taxes, and (vii) meet working capital to satisfy collateral requirements for our Fannie Mae DUS risk-sharing obligations and to meet the operational liquidity requirements of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, Ginnie Mae, and our warehouse facility lenders.
Fannie Mae has established benchmark standards for capital adequacy and reserves the right to terminate our servicing authority for all or some of the portfolio if, at any time, it determines that our financial condition is not adequate to support our obligations under the DUS agreement. We are required to maintain acceptable net worth as defined in the standards, and we satisfied the requirements as of June 30, 2023. The net worth requirement is derived primarily from unpaid balances on Fannie Mae loans and the level of risk-sharing. As of June 30, 2023, the net worth requirement was $291.1 million, and our net worth was $1.0 billion, as measured at our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop, LLC. As of June 30, 2023, we were required to maintain at least $57.9 million of liquid assets to meet our operational liquidity requirements for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, Ginnie Mae and our warehouse facility lenders. As of June 30, 2023, we had operational liquidity of $205.4 million, as measured at our wholly-owned operating subsidiary, Walker & Dunlop, LLC.
We paid a cash dividend of $0.63 per share during the second quarter of 2023, which is 5% higher than the quarterly dividend paid in the second quarter of 2022. On August 2, 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.63 per share for the third quarter of 2023. The dividend will be paid on September 1, 2023 to all holders of record of our restricted and unrestricted common stock as of August 17, 2023.
On occasion, we may use cash to fully fund some loans held for investment or loans held for sale instead of using our warehouse lines. As of June 30, 2023, we did not fully fund any loans held for investment or loans held for sale. We continually seek opportunities to complete additional acquisitions if we believe the economics are favorable.
In February 2023, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that permits the repurchase of up to $75.0 million of shares of our common stock over a 12-month period beginning February 23, 2023. Through June 30, 2023, we have not repurchased any shares under the 2023 stock repurchase program and have $75.0 million of remaining capacity under that program.
Historically, our cash flows from operations and warehouse facilities have been sufficient to enable us to meet our short-term liquidity needs and other funding requirements. We believe that cash flows from operations will continue to be sufficient for us to meet our current obligations for the foreseeable future.
Restricted Cash and Pledged Securities
Restricted cash consists primarily of good faith deposits held on behalf of borrowers between the time we enter into a loan commitment with the borrower and the investor purchases the loan. We are generally required to share the risk of any losses associated with loans sold under the Fannie Mae DUS program, our only off-balance sheet arrangement. We are required to secure this obligation by assigning collateral to Fannie Mae. We meet this obligation by assigning pledged securities to Fannie Mae. The amount of collateral required by Fannie Mae is a formulaic calculation at the loan level and considers the balance of the loan, the risk level of the loan, the age of the loan, and the level of risk-sharing. Fannie Mae requires collateral for Tier 2 loans of 75 basis points, which is funded over a 48-month period that begins upon delivery of the loan to Fannie Mae. Collateral held in the form of money market funds holding U.S. Treasuries is discounted 5%, and Agency MBS are
discounted 4% for purposes of calculating compliance with the collateral requirements. As of June 30, 2023, we held substantially all of our restricted liquidity in Agency MBS in the aggregate amount of $136.6 million. Additionally, the majority of the loans for which we have risk-sharing are Tier 2 loans. We fund any growth in our Fannie Mae required operational liquidity and collateral requirements from our working capital.
We are in compliance with the June 30, 2023 collateral requirements as outlined above. As of June 30, 2023, reserve requirements for the June 30, 2023 DUS loan portfolio will require us to fund $74.8 million in additional restricted liquidity over the next 48 months, assuming no further principal paydowns, prepayments, or defaults within our at-risk portfolio. Fannie Mae has assessed the DUS Capital Standards in the past and may make changes to these standards in the future. We generate sufficient cash flows from our operations to meet these capital standards and do not expect any future changes to have a material impact on our future operations; however, any future changes to collateral requirements may adversely impact our available cash.
Under the provisions of the DUS agreement, we must also maintain a certain level of liquid assets referred to as the operational and unrestricted portions of the required reserves each year. We satisfied these requirements as of June 30, 2023.
Sources of Liquidity: Warehouse Facilities and Notes Payable
Warehouse Facilities
We use a combination of warehouse facilities and notes payable to provide funding for our operations. We use warehouse facilities to fund our Agency Lending and Interim Loan Program. Our ability to originate Agency mortgage loans and loans held for investments depends upon our ability to secure and maintain these types of financing agreements on acceptable terms. For a detailed description of the terms of each warehouse agreement, refer to “Warehouse Facilities” in NOTE 6 in the consolidated financial statements in our 2022 Form 10-K, as updated in NOTE 6 in the condensed consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-Q.
Notes Payable
We have a senior secured credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) that provides for a $600 million term loan (the “Term Loan”) that bears interest at Adjusted Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) plus 225 basis points with a floor of 50 basis points and has a stated maturity date of December 16, 2028 (or, if earlier, the date of acceleration of the Term Loan pursuant to the term of the Credit Agreement).
On January 12, 2023, we entered into a lender joinder agreement and amendment to the Credit Agreement that provided for an incremental term loan (“Incremental Term Loan”) with a principal amount of $200.0 million, modified the ratio thresholds related to mandatory prepayments, and included a provision that allows additional types of indebtedness. The Incremental Term Loan was issued at a 2.0% discount and contains similar repayment terms as the Term Loan. The Incremental Term Loan bears interest at Adjusted Term SOFR plus 300 basis points and matures on December 16, 2028. We are obligated to make principal payments on the Incremental Term Loan in consecutive quarterly installments equal to 0.25% of the aggregate original principal amount of the Incremental Term Loan on the last business day of each March, June, September, and December, which began on June 30, 2023. We used approximately $115.9 million of the proceeds to pay off the Alliant note payable principal balance and related accrued interest and other fees of a subsidiary. As of June 30, 2023, the aggregate outstanding principal balance of the original Term Loan and Incremental Term Loan (“Corporate Debt”) was $790.5 million.
For a detailed description of the terms of the Credit Agreement, refer to “Notes Payable – Term Loan Note Payable” in NOTE 6 in the consolidated financial statements in our 2022 Form 10-K.
The note payable and the warehouse facilities are senior obligations of the Company. As of June 30, 2023, we were in compliance with all covenants related to the Credit Agreement.
62
Credit Quality and Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligations
The following table sets forth certain information useful in evaluating our credit performance.
Key Credit Metrics
Risk-sharing servicing portfolio:
Fannie Mae Full Risk
52,383,701
47,461,520
Fannie Mae Modified Risk
8,947,292
9,651,421
Freddie Mac Modified Risk
23,515
23,715
Total risk-sharing servicing portfolio
61,354,508
57,136,656
Non-risk-sharing servicing portfolio:
Fannie Mae No Risk
25,561
9,473
Freddie Mac No Risk
38,263,685
36,862,951
GNMA - HUD No Risk
Total non-risk-sharing servicing portfolio
65,219,993
61,632,751
Total loans serviced for others
126,574,501
118,769,407
Interim loans (full risk) servicing portfolio
Total servicing portfolio unpaid principal balance
Interim Program JV Managed Loans (1)
At risk servicing portfolio (2)
56,430,098
51,905,985
Maximum exposure to at risk portfolio (3)
11,346,580
10,525,093
Defaulted loans
36,983
78,659
Defaulted loans as a percentage of the at-risk portfolio
0.07
0.15
Allowance for risk-sharing as a percentage of the at-risk portfolio
0.06
0.09
Allowance for risk-sharing as a percentage of maximum exposure
0.29
0.46
For example, a $15 million loan with 50% risk-sharing has the same potential risk exposure as a $7.5 million loan with full DUS risk sharing. Accordingly, if the $15 million loan with 50% risk-sharing were to default, we would view the overall loss as a percentage of the at-risk balance, or $7.5 million, to ensure comparability between all risk-sharing obligations. To date, substantially all of the risk-sharing obligations that we have settled have been from full risk-sharing loans.
Fannie Mae DUS risk-sharing obligations are based on a tiered formula and represent substantially all of our risk-sharing activities. The risk-sharing tiers and the amount of the risk-sharing obligations we absorb under full risk-sharing are provided below. Except as described in the following paragraph, the maximum amount of risk-sharing obligations we absorb at the time of default is generally 20% of the origination unpaid principal balance (“UPB”) of the loan.
Risk-Sharing Losses
Percentage Absorbed by Us
First 5% of UPB at the time of loss settlement
100%
Next 20% of UPB at the time of loss settlement
25%
Losses above 25% of UPB at the time of loss settlement
10%
Maximum loss
20% of origination UPB
Fannie Mae can double or triple our risk-sharing obligation if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if a loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae. We may request modified risk-sharing at the time of origination, which reduces our potential risk-sharing obligation from the levels described above.
We use several techniques to manage our risk exposure under the Fannie Mae DUS risk-sharing program. These techniques include maintaining a strong underwriting and approval process, evaluating and modifying our underwriting criteria given the underlying multifamily housing market fundamentals, limiting our geographic market and borrower exposures, and electing the modified risk-sharing option under the Fannie Mae DUS program.
The Segments - Capital Markets section of “Item 1. Business” in our 2022 Form 10-K contains a discussion of the risk-sharing caps we have with Fannie Mae.
We regularly monitor the credit quality of all loans for which we have a risk-sharing obligation. Loans with indicators of underperforming credit are placed on a watch list, assigned a numerical risk rating based on our assessment of the relative credit weakness, and subjected to additional evaluation or loss mitigation. Indicators of underperforming credit include poor financial performance, poor physical condition, poor management, and delinquency. A collateral-based reserve is recorded when it is probable that a risk-sharing loan will foreclose or has foreclosed, and a reserve for estimated credit losses and a guaranty obligation are recorded for all other risk-sharing loans.
The calculated CECL reserve for the Company’s $55.7 billion at-risk Fannie Mae servicing portfolio as of June 30, 2023 was $28.9 million compared to $39.7 million as of December 31, 2022. The significant decrease in the CECL reserve was principally related to a reduction in our historical loss rate factor, which decreased from 1.2 basis points as of December 31, 2022 to 0.6 basis points as of March 31, 2023 (with no change from March 31, 2023 to June 30, 2023), as a year with significant losses in our 10-year lookback period was replaced with a year with significantly fewer losses.
As of June 30, 2023, two at-risk loans with an aggregate UPB of $37.0 million were in default compared to three at-risk loans with an aggregate UPB of $78.7 million as of June 30, 2022. The collateral-based reserve on defaulted loans was $3.5 million and $10.8 million as of June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, respectively. We had a benefit for risk-sharing obligations of $0.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2023 compared to a benefit for risk-sharing obligations of $4.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022. We had a benefit for risk-sharing obligations of $11.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2023, compared to a benefit for risk-sharing obligations of $14.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022.
We have never been required to repurchase a loan.
New/Recent Accounting Pronouncements
As seen in NOTE 2 in the condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there are no accounting pronouncements that the Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued and that have the potential to impact us but have not yet been adopted by us as of June 30, 2023.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
For loans held for sale to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and HUD, we are not currently exposed to unhedged interest rate risk during the loan commitment, closing, and delivery processes. The sale or placement of each loan to an investor is negotiated prior to closing on the loan with the borrower, and the sale or placement is typically effectuated within 60 days of closing. The coupon rate for the loan is set at the same time we establish the interest rate with the investor.
Some of our assets and liabilities are subject to changes in interest rates. Earnings from escrows generally track the effective Federal Funds Rate (“EFFR”). The EFFR was 508 basis points and 158 basis points as of June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The following table shows the impact on our annual escrow earnings due to a 100-basis point increase and decrease in EFFR based on our escrow balances outstanding at each period end. A portion of these changes in earnings as a result of a 100-basis point increase in the EFFR would be delayed several months due to the negotiated nature of some of our escrow arrangements.
Change in annual escrow earnings due to: (in thousands)
100 basis point increase in EFFR
27,883
23,499
100 basis point decrease in EFFR
(27,883)
(23,265)
The borrowing cost of our warehouse facilities used to fund loans held for sale and investments in tax credit equity is based on SOFR. The base SOFR was 509 basis points and 150 basis points as of June 30, 2023 and 2022, respectively. The interest income on our loans held for investment is based on SOFR. The SOFR reset date for loans held for investment is the same date as the SOFR reset date for the corresponding warehouse facility. The following table shows the impact on our annual net warehouse interest income due to a 100-basis point increase and decrease in Adjusted Term SOFR, based on our warehouse borrowings outstanding at each period end. The changes shown below do not reflect an increase or decrease in the interest rate earned on our loans held for sale.
Change in annual net warehouse interest income due to: (in thousands)
100 basis point increase in SOFR
(12,971)
(11,262)
100 basis point decrease in SOFR
12,971
11,030
Our Corporate Debt is based on Adjusted Term SOFR as of June 30, 2023. In January 2023, our Corporate Debt increased by $200 million. The following table shows the impact on our annual earnings due to a 100-basis point increase and decrease in SOFR as of June 30, 2023 and June 30, 2022, respectively, based on the note payable balance outstanding at each period end. The Alliant note payable as of June 30, 2022 was a fixed-rate note; therefore, there was no impact to our earnings related to this debt when interest rates change as of June 30, 2022.
Change in annual income from operations due to: (in thousands)
(7,905)
(5,970)
7,905
5,970
Market Value Risk
The fair value of our MSRs is subject to market-value risk. A 100-basis point increase or decrease in the weighted average discount rate would decrease or increase, respectively, the fair value of our MSRs by approximately $42.4 million as of June 30, 2023 compared to $40.6 million as of June 30, 2022. Our Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans include economic deterrents that reduce the risk of loan prepayment prior to the expiration of the prepayment protection period, including prepayment premiums, loan defeasance, or yield maintenance fees. These prepayment protections generally extend the duration of a loan compared to a loan without similar protections. If a loan is prepaid prior to the expiration of the prepayment protection period, and the customer is obligated to incur a prepayment premium, our servicing contacts with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac allow us to receive a portion of the prepayment premium. Our servicing contract with institutional investors and HUD do not require them to provide us with prepayment fees. As of June 30, 2023 and 2022, 90% and 88% of the loans for which we earn
servicing fees are protected from the risk of prepayment through prepayment provisions, respectively. Given this significant level of prepayment protection, we do not hedge our servicing portfolio for prepayment risk. As interest rates have risen rapidly over the past 17 months, we have experienced a significant reduction in prepayment activity within our loan servicing portfolio, which in turn has significantly reduced the volume and amount of prepayment premium revenues we receive.
London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) Transition
On June 30, 2023, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, the regulator for the administration of LIBOR, stopped publishing LIBOR rates, including the 30-day LIBOR (previously our primary reference rate). All of our legacy GSE LIBOR-based loans transitioned to SOFR effective July 1, 2023, after providing formal notice to all impacted borrowers. All of our debt agreements with warehouse facility providers included fallback language governing the transition and have all transitioned to SOFR as of June 30, 2023.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2023 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of business, we may be party to various claims and litigation, none of which we believe is material. We cannot predict the outcome of any pending litigation and may be subject to consequences that could include fines, penalties and other costs, and our reputation and business may be impacted. Our management believes that any liability that could be imposed on us in connection with the disposition of any pending lawsuits would not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, liquidity, or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We have included in Part I, Item 1A of our 2022 Form 10-K descriptions of certain risks and uncertainties that could affect our business, future performance, or financial condition (the “Risk Factors”). There have been no material changes from the disclosures provided in our 2022 Form 10-K, except as provided in Part II, Item 1A of our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2023. Investors should consider the Risk Factors prior to making an investment decision with respect to the Company’s stock.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Under the 2020 Equity Incentive Plan, subject to the Company’s approval, grantees have the option of electing to satisfy minimum tax withholding obligations at the time of vesting or exercise by allowing the Company to withhold and purchase the shares of stock otherwise issuable to the grantee. During the quarter ended June 30, 2023, we purchased nine thousand shares to satisfy grantee tax withholding
obligations on share-vesting events. During the first quarter of 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program that permits the repurchase of up to $75.0 million of the Company’s common stock over a 12-month period beginning on February 23, 2023. During the quarter ended June 30, 2023, we did not repurchase any shares under this share repurchase program. The Company had $75.0 million of authorized share repurchase capacity remaining as of June 30, 2023. The following table provides information regarding common stock repurchases for the quarter ended June 30, 2023:
Total Number of
Approximate
Shares Purchased as
Dollar Value
Total Number
Average
Part of Publicly
of Shares that May
of Shares
Price Paid
Announced Plans
Yet Be Purchased Under
Period
Purchased
per Share
or Programs
the Plans or Programs
April 1-30, 2023
3,297
76.17
75,000,000
May 1-31, 2023
2,322
67.18
June 1-30, 2023
3,523
72.24
2nd Quarter
9,142
72.37
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Rule 10b5-1 Trading Arrangements
On May 8, 2023, Howard W. Smith, III, our President and a member of our Board of Directors, adopted a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act for the cashless exercise of up to 160,166 options to purchase the Company’s common stock. The Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement has a duration of 330 days, until April 1, 2024.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits:
2.1
Contribution Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2010, by and among Mallory Walker, Howard W. Smith, William M. Walker, Taylor Walker, Richard C. Warner, Donna Mighty, Michael Alinksy, Edward B. Hermes, Deborah A. Wilson and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168535) filed on December 1, 2010)
Contribution Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2010, between Column Guaranteed LLC and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168535) filed on December 1, 2010)
Amendment No. 1 to Contribution Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2010, by and between Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and Column Guaranteed LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Amendment No. 6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168535) filed on December 13, 2010)
2.4
Purchase Agreement, dated June 7, 2012, by and among Walker & Dunlop, Inc., Walker & Dunlop, LLC, CW Financial Services LLC and CWCapital LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on June 15, 2012)
2.5
Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2021, by and among Walker & Dunlop, Inc., WDAAC, LLC, Alliant Company, LLC, Alliant Capital, Ltd., Alliant Fund Asset Holdings, LLC, Alliant Asset Management Company, LLC, Alliant Strategic Investments II, LLC, ADC Communities, LLC, ADC Communities II, LLC, AFAH Finance, LLC, Alliant Fund Acquisitions, LLC, Vista Ridge 1, LLC, Alliant, Inc., Alliant ADC, Inc., Palm Drive Associates, LLC, and Shawn Horwitz (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.5 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2021)
2.6
Share Purchase Agreement dated February 4, 2022 by and among Walker & Dunlop, Inc., WD-GTE, LLC, GeoPhy B.V. (“GeoPhy”), the several persons and entities constituting the holders of all of GeoPhy’s issued and outstanding shares of capital stock, and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, as representative of the Shareholders (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.6 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021)
3.1
Articles of Amendment and Restatement of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 4 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168535) filed on December 1, 2010)
3.2
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 10, 2023)
4.1
Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-168535) filed on September 30, 2010)
4.2
Registration Rights Agreement, dated December 20, 2010, by and among Walker & Dunlop, Inc. and Mallory Walker, Taylor Walker, William M. Walker, Howard W. Smith, III, Richard C. Warner, Donna Mighty, Michael Yavinsky, Ted Hermes, Deborah A. Wilson and Column Guaranteed LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2010)
4.3
Stockholders Agreement, dated December 20, 2010, by and among William M. Walker, Mallory Walker, Column Guaranteed LLC and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2010)
4.4
Piggy-Back Registration Rights Agreement, dated June 7, 2012, by and among Column Guaranteed, LLC, William M. Walker, Mallory Walker, Howard W. Smith, III, Deborah A. Wilson, Richard C. Warner, CW Financial Services LLC and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 filed on August 9, 2012)
4.5
Voting Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2012, by and among Walker & Dunlop, Inc., Walker & Dunlop, LLC, Mallory Walker, William M. Walker, Richard Warner, Deborah Wilson, Richard M. Lucas, and Howard W. Smith, III, and CW Financial Services LLC (incorporated by reference to Annex C of the Company’s proxy statement filed on July 26, 2012)
4.6
Voting Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2012, by and among Walker & Dunlop, Inc., Walker & Dunlop, LLC, Column Guaranteed, LLC and CW Financial Services LLC (incorporated by reference to Annex D of the Company’s proxy statement filed on July 26, 2012)
10.1
Thirteenth Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Warehousing Credit and Security Agreement, dates as of April 10, 2023, by and among Walker & Dunlop, LLC Walker & Dunlop, Inc, and PNC Bank, National Association, as Lender (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 13, 2023).
31.1
*
Certification of Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2
Certification of Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
**
Certification of Walker & Dunlop, Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS
Inline XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCH
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE
Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
*: Filed herewith.
**: Furnished herewith. Information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q furnished herewith shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 3, 2023
By:
/s/ William M. Walker
William M. Walker
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Gregory A. Florkowski
Gregory A. Florkowski
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer