WESCO International - 10-Q quarterly report FY

 

or

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at least the past 90 days. Yes þ No o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes þ No o.

As of July 29, 2005, WESCO International, Inc. had 47,099,617 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

(unaudited)

     WESCO International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “WESCO”), headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, is a full-line distributor of electrical supplies and equipment and is a provider of integrated supply procurement services. WESCO currently operates approximately 350 branch locations and five distribution centers located in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Guam, the United Kingdom, Nigeria, United Arab Emirates and Singapore.

     Basis of Presentation

     The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of WESCO and all of its subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in WESCO’s 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

     The unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2005, the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively, and the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively, in the opinion of management, have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. All adjustments reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are of a normal recurring nature unless indicated. Results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

     Gross Profit

     Our calculation of gross profit is net sales less cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold include our cost of the products sold and excludes cost for selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization, which are reported separately in the statement of income.

     Stock-Based Compensation

     During the year ended December 31, 2003, WESCO adopted the measurement provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. This change in accounting method was applied on a prospective basis in accordance with SFAS No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure — an amendment of SFAS No. 123. Stock options awarded prior to 2003 are accounted for under the intrinsic value method under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The Company recognized $1.5 million and $3.1 million of compensation expense for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. The Company recognized $0.4 million and $0.7 million of compensation expense for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. There were no options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004.

     The following table presents the pro forma results as if the fair-value based method of accounting for stock-based awards had been applied to all outstanding options:

     Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle as well as to changes required by an accounting pronouncement that does not include specific transition provisions. SFAS No. 154 eliminates the requirement to include the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle in the income statement and instead requires that changes in accounting principle be retroactively applied. A change in accounting estimate continues to be accounted for in the period of change and future periods if necessary. A correction of an error continues to be reported by restating prior period financial statements. SFAS No. 154 is effective for WESCO for accounting changes and correction of errors made on or after January 1, 2006.

     In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share— Based Payment. This statement is a revision of SFAS Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS No. 123R addresses all forms of share based payment (“SBP”) awards, including shares issued under employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. Under SFAS No.123R, SBP awards result in a cost that will be measured at fair value on the awards’ grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest and will be reflected as compensation expense in the financial statements. In addition, this statement will apply to unvested options granted prior to the effective date. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107) regarding the SEC Staff’s interpretation of SFAS No. 123R and provides the Staff’s view regarding interaction between SFAS No. 123R and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides interpretation of the valuation of SBP for public companies. In April 2005, the SEC approved a rule that delays the effective date of SFAS No. 123R for annual, rather than interim, reporting periods that begin after June 15, 2005. WESCO is currently evaluating the effect that implementation of SFAS 123R and SAB 107 will have on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

     In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs — an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 43, Chapter 4. This Statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for normal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). This statement becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. It is expected that this statement will not have a material effect on our financial statements.

     In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (FSP 109-2) which provides guidance under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, with respect to recording the potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on enterprises’ income tax expense and deferred tax liability. The Jobs Act was enacted on October 22, 2004. FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. We have no plans to make an election under this act to repatriate foreign earnings. Accordingly, as provided for in FSP 109-2, we have not adjusted our tax expense or deferred tax liability to reflect the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act.

     The following table sets forth the details of basic and diluted earnings per share:

     Equity awards to purchase 0.8 million shares of common stock at an exercise price of $24.02 per share that were outstanding as of June 30, 2005 were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because to do so would have been antidilutive for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2005.

     WESCO maintains an accounts receivable securitization program (“Receivables Facility”) that had a total purchase commitment of $350 million and $325 million as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. On May 11, 2005, the facility was amended to increase the total purchase commitment from $325 million to $350 million with a term of three years. Under the Receivables Facility, WESCO sells, on a continuous basis, an undivided interest in all domestic accounts receivable to WESCO Receivables Corporation, a wholly owned, special purpose entity (“SPC”). The SPC sells without recourse to a third-party conduit all the eligible receivables while maintaining a subordinated interest, in the form of overcollateralization, in a portion of the receivables. WESCO has agreed to continue servicing the sold receivables for the financial institution at market rates; accordingly, no servicing asset or liability has been recorded.

     As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, accounts receivable eligible for securitization totaled approximately $456 million and $420 million, respectively, of which the subordinated retained interest was approximately $126 million and $212 million, respectively. Accordingly, $330.0 million and $208.0 million of accounts receivable balances were removed from the consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Costs associated with the Receivables Facility totaled $3.0 million and $1.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively. Costs associated with the Receivables Facility totaled $5.0 million and $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, respectively. These amounts are recorded as other expenses in the consolidated statements of income and are primarily related to the discount and loss on the sale of accounts receivables, partially offset by related servicing revenue.

     The key economic assumptions used to measure the retained interest at the date of the securitization for securitizations completed in 2005 were a discount rate of 3.0% and an estimated life of 1.5 months. At June 30, 2005, an immediate adverse change in the discount rate or estimated life of 10% and 20% would result in a reduction in the fair value of the retained interest of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. Changes in fair value based on a 10% variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in this example, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another.

     On March 1, 2005, we redeemed $123.8 million in aggregate principal amount of our senior subordinated notes at a loss of $10.1 million resulting from the payment of the call premium and the write-off of the unamortized original issue discount and debt issuance costs. As of June 30, 2005, we had remaining $199.7 million in principal amount of the 9 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 that were issued June 1998.

     In June 2005, we increased the size of the revolving credit facility to $250 million and amended the maturity date to June 17, 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2005 borrowings and repayments were each $147.4 million.

     In June 2005, we paid $30 million pursuant to the Bruckner note payable.

     The following table sets forth comprehensive income and its components:

     The following table sets forth the reconciliation between the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective rate:

     WESCO Distribution, Inc. has issued $400 million of 9 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008. As of June 30, 2005, $200.3 million of the aggregate principal amount has been redeemed by WESCO. The senior subordinated notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by WESCO International, Inc. on a subordinated basis to all existing and future senior indebtedness of WESCO International, Inc. Condensed consolidating financial information for WESCO International, Inc., WESCO Distribution, Inc. and the non-guarantor subsidiaries are as follows:

     On July 1, 2005, WESCO granted 884,500 stock-settled stock appreciation rights at an exercise price of $31.65.

     On July 29, WESCO acquired the assets and business of Fastec Industrial Corp. (Fastec). Fastec is a nationwide importer and distributor of industrial fasteners, cabinet hardware, and locking and latching products and has annual sales of approximately $55 million and employs 145 people. The acquisition was funded under our existing financing arrangements.

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the information in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein and WESCO International Inc.’s Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in its 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     WESCO is a full-line distributor of electrical supplies and equipment and is a provider of integrated supply procurement services. WESCO currently operates approximately 350 full service branches and five distribution centers located in the United States, Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Guam, the United Kingdom, Nigeria, United Arab Emirates and Singapore. We serve over 100,000 customers worldwide, offering over 1,000,000 products from over 24,000 suppliers. Our diverse customer base includes a wide variety of industrial companies; contractors for industrial, commercial and residential projects; utility companies, and commercial, institutional and governmental customers. Approximately 87% of our net sales are generated from operations in the U.S., 11% from Canada and the remainder from other countries.

     Sales growth, along with positive impact from our cost improvement initiatives contributed to improved financial results for the first six months of 2005. Sales increased 15.4% over the same period last year and the gross margin of 18.5% compares to 2004 gross margin of 19.4% with the decline primarily due to favorable commodity pricing in 2004, which increased the gross margin percentage in 2004, but was not as significant in 2005 and contributed to a lower gross margin percentage for the period and partially due to a mix shift to lower gross margin sales in 2005. Operating income improved by 26.5% compared with last year’s comparable period and the year to date net income was $38.8 million versus $28.8 million in last year’s comparable period. Operating income improvement was driven by cost control and improved leverage on the sales growth.

     We generated $135.2 million in operating cash flow for the first six months of 2005. Included in this amount was a $122.0 million cash inflow from an increase in our Receivables Facility. During the six month period ended June 30, 2005 we redeemed $123.8 million of our senior subordinated notes at a pretax loss of $10.1 million, paid $30 million pursuant to the Bruckner note payable and paid $1.0 million pursuant to the terms of an acquisition purchase agreement.

     As of June 30, 2005, we had approximately $204 million in available borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility.

     Improvements in operations and our capital structure made in 2004 have positioned us well for 2005. Though we continue to see improvements in the macroeconomic data that reflect activity levels in our major end markets, capital spending in the manufacturing and construction markets we serve are still somewhat below the levels experienced in 2000 and 2001. Although we are seeing signs of improvement, we anticipate a lag before we see a broad-based increase in capital spending. Accordingly, we continue to focus on selling and marketing initiatives to increase market share, margin expansion and cost containment as we drive to improve our operating performance for the rest of 2005.

     During the six-month period ended June 30, 2005, there were no significant changes to our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates referenced in the 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     Gross Profit

     Our calculation of gross profit is net sales less cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold include our cost of the products sold and excludes cost for selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization which are reported separately in the statement of income.

     The following table sets forth the percentage relationship to net sales of certain items in our condensed consolidated statements of income for the periods presented:

     Net sales in the second quarter of 2005 totaled $1,062.1 million versus $931.0 million in the comparable period for 2004, a 14.1% increase. Approximately 12.8% of the increase in sales was attributable to increased volume. The remaining portion of the increase was due to improved pricing on commodity products of 0.4% and 0.9% from the strength of the Canadian dollar.

     Gross profit for the second quarter of 2005 was $194.6 million versus $183.7 million for the 2004 second quarter, and gross margin percentage of net sales was 18.3% versus 19.7% last year. The gross margin percentage decline was primarily due to a favorable commodity pricing in 2004, which increased the gross margin percentage in 2004, but was not as significant in 2005 and contributed to a lower gross margin percentage for the period and partially due to a mix shift to lower gross margin sales in 2005.

     Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses in the second quarter of 2005 totaled $142.0 million versus $136.2 million in last year’s comparable quarter. Total payroll expense increased approximately $2.3 million over last year’s second quarter principally from increased salaries and commissions of $3.2 million, decreased health care and benefits costs of $0.7 million, decreased variable incentive compensation costs of $1.2 million and increased stock option expense of $1.2 million. Shipping and handling expense included in SG&A was $11.2 million in the second quarter of 2005 compared with $9.2 million in last year’s second quarter. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses decreased to 13.4% from 14.6% in last year’s second quarter reflecting the leverage of higher sales volume and the continuous improvements resulting from the implementation of our LEAN initiatives.

     Depreciation and amortization for the second quarter of 2005 was $3.7 million versus $4.7 million in last year’s second quarter. Depreciation in the second quarter decreased $1.0 million in 2005 compared to 2004 as a result of a reduction in capital spending over each of the last four years.

     Interest expense totaled $6.8 million for the second quarter of 2005 versus $10.1 million in last year’s second quarter, a decrease of 32.5%. The decline was due to a lower amount of average indebtedness outstanding during the current quarter as compared to the first quarter of 2004 offset somewhat by a slightly higher consolidated effective interest rate.

     Other expense during the second quarter of 2005 increased to $3.0 million versus $1.3 million in 2004, reflecting costs associated with the Receivables Facility. This increase is due to the increase in the average of the accounts receivable sold for the second quarter of 2005 to $317.4 million versus $260.0 million in last year’s comparable quarter and an increase in the average interest rate in 2005 of 3.8% versus 2004 of 1.8%.

     Income tax expense totaled $11.6 million and the effective tax rate was 29.8% for the second quarter of 2005 compared to an income tax expense of $10.7 million and an effective tax rate 36.0% for the comparable quarter of 2004. The current quarter’s effective tax rate differed from the statutory rate primarily as a result of a decrease in foreign taxes resulting from the recapitalization of the Canadian operations and a decrease in federal taxes due to research and development (R&D) tax credits.

     For the second quarter of 2005, net income increased by $8.4 million to $27.4 million, or $0.56 per diluted share, compared with $19.1 million and $0.44 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2004. The increase in net income was primarily attributable to increased sales and decreases in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales, depreciation and amortization, and interest expense offset by increases in other expense and income tax expense.

     The following table sets forth the percentage relationship to net sales of certain items in WESCO’s condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented:

     Net sales in the six months ended June 30, 2005 totaled $2,052.9 million versus $1,778.8 million in the comparable 2004 period, a 15.4% increase. Approximately 13.4% of the increase in sales was attributable to increased volume. The remaining portion of the increase was split between improved pricing on commodity products of approximately 1.1% and the strength of the Canadian dollar of 0.9%.

     Gross profit for the six months ended June 30, 2005 of $379.8 million versus $344.6 million for last year’s comparable period, and gross margin percentage of net sales was 18.5% versus 19.4% last year. The gross margin percentage decline was primarily due to a favorable commodity pricing in 2004, which increased the gross margin percentage in 2004, but was not as significant in 2005 and contributed to a lower gross margin percentage for the period and partially due to a mix shift to lower gross margin sales in 2005.

     SG&A expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2005 totaled $284.7 million versus $265.8 million in last year’s comparable period. Total payroll expense increased approximately $13.1 million over last year’s first half principally from increased salaries and commissions of $8.6 million, increased variable incentive compensation costs of $0.7 million, increased health care and benefits costs of $3.0 million and increased stock option expense of $2.5 million offset by decreases in other payroll related expenses of $1.7 million. Shipping and handling expense included in SG&A was $21.0 million and $17.8 million for the six months ending June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses decreased to 13.9% compared with 14.9% in last year’s six-month period reflecting the leverage of higher sales volume and the continuous improvements resulting from the implementation of our LEAN initiatives.

     Depreciation and amortization was $7.6 million in the first six months of 2005 versus $9.7 million in last year’s comparable period. The decrease of $2.1 million in 2005 compared to 2004 as a result of a reduction in capital expenditures over each of the last four years.

     Interest expense totaled $16.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 versus $20.0 million in last year’s comparable period. The decline was due to a lower amount of indebtedness outstanding during the current period offset somewhat by a slightly higher consolidated effective interest rate.

     Loss on debt extinguishments of $10.1 million and $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, represented the loss on the repurchase of our senior subordinated notes during those periods.

     Other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 increased to $5.0 million versus $2.5 million in 2004, reflecting costs associated with the Receivables Facility. This increase is due to the increase in the average of the accounts receivable sold for this six month period of 2005 to $289.2 million versus $243.6 million in last year’s comparable six month period and an increase in the in the average interest rate in 2005 of 3.5% versus 2004 of 1.8%.

     For the six months ended June 30, 2005, income tax expense totaled $17.7 million and the effective tax rate was 31.3%. Income tax expense totaled $16.2 million in last year’s comparable period and the effective tax rate was 36.0%. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2005 differed from the statutory rate primarily as a result of a decrease in foreign taxes resulting from the recapitalization of the Canadian operations and a decrease in federal taxes due to R&D tax credits.

     For the six months ended June 30, 2005, net income totaled $38.8 million, or $0.79 per diluted share, versus $28.8 million, or $0.67 per diluted share, in last year’s comparable period. The increase in net income was primarily attributable to increased sales and decreases in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of net sales, depreciation and amortization and interest expense offset by increases in loss from debt extinguishment, other expense and income tax expense.

     Total assets were $1.3 billion and $1.4 billion at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. During the first six months of 2005, total liabilities decreased $129.5 million to $873.8 million. This net decrease was primarily due to a decrease in accrued payroll and benefit costs of $16.6 million from the payment in 2005 related to 2004 management incentive compensation and a decrease of $138.4 million in long-term debt primarily from the repurchase of $123.8 million of the Company’s senior subordinated notes, partially offset by an increase of $38.3 million in accounts payable due to higher sales volume.

     Our liquidity needs arise from seasonal working capital requirements, capital expenditures, acquisitions and debt service obligations. In addition, certain of our acquisition agreements contain earn-out provisions based principally on future earnings targets, only one of which could require a significant payment. Management estimates these payments could range up to $17 million and could be made in multiple payments between 2006 and 2010.

     We finance our operating and investing needs, as follows:

     Revolving Credit Facility

     In March 2002, WESCO Distribution, Inc. entered into a $290 million revolving credit agreement that is collateralized by substantially all inventory owned by WESCO and also by the accounts receivable of WESCO Distribution Canada LP. We reduced the size of this revolving credit facility to $200 million in September 2003. In June 2005, we increased the size of the facility to $250 million and amended the maturity date to June 17, 2010. Availability under the facility is limited to the amount of U.S. and Canadian eligible inventory and Canadian receivables applied against certain advance rates. Depending upon the amount of excess availability under the facility, interest is calculated at LIBOR plus a margin that ranges between 1.0% to 1.75% or at the Index Rate (prime rate published by The Wall Street Journal) plus a margin that ranges between (0.25%) to 0.50%. As long as the average daily excess availability for both the preceding and projected succeeding 90-day period is greater than $50 million, then we would be permitted to make acquisitions and repurchase outstanding public stock and bonds.

     The above permitted transactions would also be allowed if such excess availability is between $25 million and $50 million and our fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined by the agreement, is at least 1.25 to 1.0 after taking into consideration the permitted transaction. Additionally, if excess availability under the agreement is less than $50 million, then we must maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.1 to 1.0. At June 30, 2005, the interest rate was 4.3%. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of June 30, 2005. During the six months ending June 30, 2005, borrowings and repayments were each $147.4 million. At June 30, 2005 there was no outstanding balance and approximately $227 million in availability.

     Senior Notes

     On March 1, 2005, we redeemed $123.8 million in aggregate principal amount of our senior subordinated notes at a loss of $10.1 million resulting from the payment of the call premium and the write-off of the unamortized original issue discount and debt issue costs. As of June 30, 2005, we had remaining $199.7 million in principal amount of the 9 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2008 that were issued in June 1998.

     Mortgage Financing Facility

     In February 2003, WESCO finalized a $51 million mortgage financing facility, $48.8 million of which was outstanding as of June 30, 2005. Borrowings under the mortgage financing are collateralized by 75 domestic properties and are subject to a 22-year amortization schedule with a balloon payment due at the end of the 10 year term. Interest rates on borrowings under this facility are fixed at 6.5%.

     Bruckner Note Payable

     In June 2005, we paid $30 million pursuant to the Bruckner note payable.

     Interest Rate Swap Agreements

     In September 2003, we entered into a $50 million interest rate swap agreement and in December 2003, we entered into two additional $25 million interest rate swap agreements. These agreements have terms expiring concurrently with the maturity of our 9 1/8% senior subordinated notes and were entered into with the intent of converting $100 million of the senior subordinated notes from a fixed-to-floating rate. Pursuant to these agreements, we receive semi-annual fixed interest payments at the rate of 9.125% commencing December 1, 2003 and make semi-annual variable interest rate payments at six-month LIBOR rates plus a premium in arrears. The LIBOR rates in the agreements reset every six months. Therefore, the effective interest rate at June 30, 2005, ranged from 7.4% to 7.6%. The agreements can be terminated by the counterparty in accordance with a redemption schedule that is consistent with the redemption schedule for the senior subordinated notes.

     We enter into interest rate swap agreements as a means to hedge our interest rate exposure and maintain certain amounts of variable rate and fixed rate debt. Since the swaps have been designated as hedging instruments, their fair values are reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Net amounts to be received or paid under the swap agreements are reflected as adjustments to interest expense.

     Operating Activities. Cash provided by operating activities during the first six months of 2005 totaled $135.2 million compared to $72.2 million in the prior year. Cash provided by operating activities during the first six months of 2005 and for the same period in 2004, included cash inflows of $122.0 million and $75.0 million, respectively, associated with changes related to our Receivables Facility. Cash generated by net income of $38.8 million adjusted for non cash items of $11.8 million for the six months ending June 30, 2005 totaled $50.6 million. Cash generated by net income of $28.8 million and adjustments for non cash items of $13.5 million for the comparable six months of 2004 totaled $42.3 million. During the six months ending June 30, 2005 and 2004, cash inflows from increases in accounts payable of $39.4 million and $79.4 million, respectively, were offset by a use of cash for increased accounts receivable of $64.6 million and $78.8 million, respectively. During the six months ending June 30, 2005 and 2004, the combined changes in inventories, prepaid expenses, accrued payroll and benefits and other current and noncurrent liabilities resulted in a use of cash of $12.2 million and cash inflows of $45.8 million, respectively.

     Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the first six months of 2005 and 2004 was $8.9 million and $35.9 million respectively. Capital expenditures were $7.9 million and $5.2 million for the six months ending June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Expenditures made pursuant to the terms of acquisition purchase agreements during the first six months of 2005 and 2004 were $1.0 million and $30.7 million, respectively.

     Financing Activities. Net cash used by financing activities for the first six months of 2005 and 2004 was $145.6 million and $54.0 million, respectively. During the first six months of 2005, the Company redeemed $123.8 million in aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes. Proceeds and repayments from long-term debt, inclusive of the redemption of the senior subordinated notes during the first six months of 2005, were $147.4 million and $297.3 million, respectively, and $165.8 million and $203.4 million during the first six months of 2004. During the first six months of 2004, $20.1 million in cash payments were made to certain employees for the redemption of stock options. During the first six months of 2005 and 2004, the proceeds from the redemption of stock options were $5.3 million and $3.8 million, respectively. During the first six months of 2005, expenditures of $0.9 million were made in conjunction with the amendments to the revolving credit facility and the receivables facility.

     There have not been any material changes in our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments that would require an update to the disclosure provided in our Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2004.

     Our accounts receivable securitization facility was amended on May 11, 2005 and provides for a $350 million purchase commitment with a three year term expiring May 9, 2008. Under the Receivables Facility, WESCO sells, on a continuous basis, to WESCO Receivables Corporation, a wholly owned special purpose company (“SPC”), an undivided interest in all domestic accounts receivable. The SPC sells without recourse to a third-party conduit, all the eligible receivables while maintaining a subordinated interest, in the form of overcollateralization, in a portion of the receivables. We have agreed to continue servicing the sold receivables for the financial institution at market rates; accordingly, no servicing asset or liability has been recorded. As of June 30, 2005, $330.0 million in funding was outstanding under the Receivables Facility with $20.0 million in availability.

     The rate of inflation, as measured by changes in the consumer price index, did not have a material effect on the sales or operating results of the Company during the periods presented. However, inflation in the future could affect the Company’s operating costs. Price changes from suppliers have historically been consistent with inflation and have not had a material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

     The Company’s operating results are affected by certain seasonal factors. Sales are typically at their lowest during the first quarter due to a reduced level of activity during the winter months of January and February. Sales increase beginning in March with slight fluctuations per month through December. As a result, the Company reports sales and earnings in the first quarter that are generally lower than that of the remaining quarters.

     In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which changes the requirements for the accounting and reporting of a change in accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle as well as to changes required by an accounting pronouncement that does not include specific transition provisions. SFAS No. 154 eliminates the requirement to include the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle in the income statement and instead requires that changes in accounting principle be retroactively applied. A change in accounting estimate continues to be accounted for in the period of change and future periods if necessary. A correction of an error continues to be reported by restating prior period financial statements. SFAS No. 154 is effective for WESCO for accounting changes and correction of errors made on or after January 1, 2006.

     In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123R, Share- Based Payment. This statement is a revision of SFAS Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance. SFAS No. 123R addresses all forms of share based payment (“SBP”) awards including shares issued under employee stock purchase plans, stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights. Under SFAS No.123R, SBP awards result in a cost that will be measured at fair value on the awards’ grant date, based on the estimated number of awards that are expected to vest and will be reflected as compensation expense in the financial statements. In addition, this statement will apply to unvested options granted prior to the effective date. This new standard is effective for annual reporting periods that begin after June 15, 2005. WESCO is currently evaluating the effect that implementation of the new standard will have on its financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

     In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs — an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 43, Chapter 4. This Statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing , to clarify the accounting for normal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). This statement becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. It is expected that this statement will not have a material effect on our financial statements.

     In May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 109-2, Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (FSP 109-2) which provides guidance under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, with respect to recording the potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Jobs Act) on enterprises’ income tax expense and deferred tax liability. The Jobs Act was enacted on October 22, 2004. FSP 109-2 states that an enterprise is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Jobs Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. We have no plans to make an election under this act to repatriate foreign earnings. Accordingly, as provided for in FSP 109-2, we have not adjusted our tax expense or deferred tax liability to reflect the repatriation provisions of the Jobs Act.

     From time to time in this report and in other written reports and oral statements, references are made to expectations regarding our future performance. When used in this context, the words “anticipates,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “intends,” “expects,” “projects,” “will” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words. Such statements including, but not limited to, our statements regarding our business strategy, growth strategy, productivity and profitability enhancement, new product and service introductions and liquidity and capital resources are based on management’s beliefs, as well as on assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management, and involve various risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond our control. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by or on our behalf. In light of these risks and uncertainties there can be no assurance that the forward-looking information will in fact prove to be accurate. Factors that might cause actual results to differ from such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, an increase in competition, the amount of outstanding indebtedness, the availability of appropriate acquisition opportunities, availability of key products, functionality of information systems, international operating environments and other risks that are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 which are incorporated by reference herein or other documents subsequently filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We have undertaken no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

     There have not been any material changes to our exposures to market risk during the six months ended June 30, 2005 that would require an update to the disclosures provided in our Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2004.

     At June 30, 2005 the net fair value of interest-rate-related derivatives designated as fair value hedges of debt was a liability of $0.7 million.

     An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by WESCO in reports that it files under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and to timely alert them to any material information relating to the registrant and its consolidated subsidiaries that is required to be included in our periodic reports. There have been no significant changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

     From time to time, a number of lawsuits and claims have been or may be asserted against WESCO relating to the conduct of its business, including routine litigation relating to commercial and employment matters. The outcomes of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some lawsuits, including the matters specified below, may be determined adversely to WESCO. However, management does not believe that the ultimate outcome is likely to have a material adverse effect on WESCO’s financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any fiscal quarter of one or more of these matters may have a material adverse effect on WESCO’s results of operations for that period.

     WESCO is a defendant in a lawsuit in a state court in Florida in which a former supplier alleges that WESCO failed to fulfill its commercial obligations to purchase product and seeks substantial monetary damages. WESCO believes that it has meritorious defenses. Discovery is ongoing. The court had scheduled the case for trial in August 2005, but has granted a motion for continuance to a date to be determined.

     WESCO is a defendant in a suit filed in federal district court in northern California alleging antitrust, contract and other claims. Plaintiff, a contractor, alleges that WESCO has monopolized the sale and distribution of certain electrical products in a regulated utility services market. Plaintiff seeks economic and treble damages as well as punitive damages and injunctive relief. WESCO believes that it has meritorious defenses and has asserted counterclaims for breach of contract. Discovery has been extended until late 2005.

     As discussed in our previous SEC Form 8-K filings on June 15, 2005 and August 3, 2005, during the three month period ended June 30, 2005, Cypress Group LLC (Cypress) sold 4.0 million shares of common stock of WESCO International and on August 3, 2005, Cypress sold their remaining 9.1 million shares of common stock of WESCO International. WESCO did not receive any proceeds from the sale of these securities.

     (a) Exhibits

     31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act.

     31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Exchange Act.

     32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

     32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.