Companies:
10,651
total market cap:
$139.941 T
Sign In
๐บ๐ธ
EN
English
$ USD
โฌ
EUR
๐ช๐บ
โน
INR
๐ฎ๐ณ
ยฃ
GBP
๐ฌ๐ง
$
CAD
๐จ๐ฆ
$
AUD
๐ฆ๐บ
$
NZD
๐ณ๐ฟ
$
HKD
๐ญ๐ฐ
$
SGD
๐ธ๐ฌ
Global ranking
Ranking by countries
America
๐บ๐ธ United States
๐จ๐ฆ Canada
๐ฒ๐ฝ Mexico
๐ง๐ท Brazil
๐จ๐ฑ Chile
Europe
๐ช๐บ European Union
๐ฉ๐ช Germany
๐ฌ๐ง United Kingdom
๐ซ๐ท France
๐ช๐ธ Spain
๐ณ๐ฑ Netherlands
๐ธ๐ช Sweden
๐ฎ๐น Italy
๐จ๐ญ Switzerland
๐ต๐ฑ Poland
๐ซ๐ฎ Finland
Asia
๐จ๐ณ China
๐ฏ๐ต Japan
๐ฐ๐ท South Korea
๐ญ๐ฐ Hong Kong
๐ธ๐ฌ Singapore
๐ฎ๐ฉ Indonesia
๐ฎ๐ณ India
๐ฒ๐พ Malaysia
๐น๐ผ Taiwan
๐น๐ญ Thailand
๐ป๐ณ Vietnam
Others
๐ฆ๐บ Australia
๐ณ๐ฟ New Zealand
๐ฎ๐ฑ Israel
๐ธ๐ฆ Saudi Arabia
๐น๐ท Turkey
๐ท๐บ Russia
๐ฟ๐ฆ South Africa
>> All Countries
Ranking by categories
๐ All assets by Market Cap
๐ Automakers
โ๏ธ Airlines
๐ซ Airports
โ๏ธ Aircraft manufacturers
๐ฆ Banks
๐จ Hotels
๐ Pharmaceuticals
๐ E-Commerce
โ๏ธ Healthcare
๐ฆ Courier services
๐ฐ Media/Press
๐ท Alcoholic beverages
๐ฅค Beverages
๐ Clothing
โ๏ธ Mining
๐ Railways
๐ฆ Insurance
๐ Real estate
โ Ports
๐ผ Professional services
๐ด Food
๐ Restaurant chains
โ๐ป Software
๐ Semiconductors
๐ฌ Tobacco
๐ณ Financial services
๐ข Oil&Gas
๐ Electricity
๐งช Chemicals
๐ฐ Investment
๐ก Telecommunication
๐๏ธ Retail
๐ฅ๏ธ Internet
๐ Construction
๐ฎ Video Game
๐ป Tech
๐ฆพ AI
>> All Categories
ETFs
๐ All ETFs
๐๏ธ Bond ETFs
๏ผ Dividend ETFs
โฟ Bitcoin ETFs
โข Ethereum ETFs
๐ช Crypto Currency ETFs
๐ฅ Gold ETFs & ETCs
๐ฅ Silver ETFs & ETCs
๐ข๏ธ Oil ETFs & ETCs
๐ฝ Commodities ETFs & ETNs
๐ Emerging Markets ETFs
๐ Small-Cap ETFs
๐ Low volatility ETFs
๐ Inverse/Bear ETFs
โฌ๏ธ Leveraged ETFs
๐ Global/World ETFs
๐บ๐ธ USA ETFs
๐บ๐ธ S&P 500 ETFs
๐บ๐ธ Dow Jones ETFs
๐ช๐บ Europe ETFs
๐จ๐ณ China ETFs
๐ฏ๐ต Japan ETFs
๐ฎ๐ณ India ETFs
๐ฌ๐ง UK ETFs
๐ฉ๐ช Germany ETFs
๐ซ๐ท France ETFs
โ๏ธ Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Gold Mining ETFs
โ๏ธ Silver Mining ETFs
๐งฌ Biotech ETFs
๐ฉโ๐ป Tech ETFs
๐ Real Estate ETFs
โ๏ธ Healthcare ETFs
โก Energy ETFs
๐ Renewable Energy ETFs
๐ก๏ธ Insurance ETFs
๐ฐ Water ETFs
๐ด Food & Beverage ETFs
๐ฑ Socially Responsible ETFs
๐ฃ๏ธ Infrastructure ETFs
๐ก Innovation ETFs
๐ Semiconductors ETFs
๐ Aerospace & Defense ETFs
๐ Cybersecurity ETFs
๐ฆพ Artificial Intelligence ETFs
Watchlist
Account
W. W. Grainger
GWW
#460
Rank
$51.65 B
Marketcap
๐บ๐ธ
United States
Country
$1,080
Share price
-0.21%
Change (1 day)
-3.47%
Change (1 year)
W. W. Grainger, Inc.
is an American industrial supply distribution company with offerings such as motors, lighting, material handling, fasteners, plumbing, tools, and safety supplies.
Market cap
Revenue
Earnings
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
Annual Reports (10-K)
More
Price history
P/E ratio
P/S ratio
P/B ratio
Operating margin
EPS
Stock Splits
Dividends
Dividend yield
Shares outstanding
Fails to deliver
Cost to borrow
Total assets
Total liabilities
Total debt
Cash on Hand
Net Assets
W. W. Grainger
Annual Reports (10-K)
Submitted on 2009-02-27
W. W. Grainger - 10-K annual report
Text size:
Small
Medium
Large
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
_______
to
_______
Commission File Number 1-5684
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Illinois
36-1150280
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
100 Grainger Parkway, Lake Forest, Illinois
60045-5201
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(847) 535-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock $0.50 par value, and accompanying
New York Stock Exchange
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
Chicago Stock Exchange
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
___X____
No _______
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes
___ ____
No
___X___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
___X____
No _______
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
T
Accelerated filer
£
Non-accelerated filer
£
Smaller reporting company
£
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ________ No
___
X
___
The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was $5,897,949,081 as of the close of trading as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2008. The Company does not have nonvoting common equity.
The registrant had 74,855,074 shares of common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2009.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders of the registrant to be held on April 29, 2009, are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page(s
)
PART I
Item 1:
BUSINESS
3-5
THE COMPANY
3
GRAINGER BRANCH-BASED
3-4
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
3-4
MEXICO
4
CHINA
4
ACKLANDS – GRAINGER BRANCH-BASED
4
LAB SAFETY
4
COMPETITION
5
EMPLOYEES
5
WEB SITE ACCESS TO COMPANY REPORTS
5
Item 1A
:
RISK FACTORS
5-6
Item 1B
:
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
6
Item 2:
PROPERTIES
6-7
Item 3:
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
7
Item 4:
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
8
Executive Officers
8
PART II
Item 5:
MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
9-10
Item 6:
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
10-11
Item 7:
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
11-22
Item 7A:
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
22
Item 8:
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
22
Item 9:
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS
ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
22
Item 9A:
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
22
Item 9B:
OTHER INFORMATION
22
PART III
Item 10:
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
23
Item 11:
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
23
Item 12:
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
23
Item 13:
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
23
Item 14:
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
23
PART IV
Item 15:
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
23-24
Signatures
25
Certifications
65-68
2
PART I
Item 1: Business
The Company
W.W. Grainger, Inc., incorporated in the State of Illinois in 1928, distributes facilities maintenance products and provides services and related information used by businesses and institutions primarily in the United States, Canada and Mexico to keep their facilities and equipment running. In this report, the words “Grainger” or “Company” mean W.W. Grainger, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
Grainger is the leading broad-line supplier of facilities maintenance and other related products in North America. Grainger uses a multichannel business model to provide customers with a range of options for finding and purchasing products through a network of branches, sales representatives, direct marketing including catalogs and a variety of electronic and Internet channels. Grainger serves approximately 1.8 million customers through a network of 617 branches, 18 distribution centers and multiple Web sites.
Grainger’s three reportable segments are Grainger Branch-based, Acklands – Grainger Branch-based (Acklands – Grainger) and Lab Safety Supply, Inc. (Lab Safety). Grainger Branch-based is an aggregation of the following business units: Grainger Industrial Supply (Industrial Supply), Grainger, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico), Grainger Caribe Inc. (Puerto Rico), Grainger China LLC (China) and Grainger Panama S.A. (Panama). Acklands – Grainger is the Company’s Canadian branch-based distribution business. Lab Safety is a direct marketer of safety and other industrial products. Late in 2008, the Company announced plans to integrate Lab Safety Supply with Grainger Industrial Supply. During 2009, Grainger will be integrating the Lab Safety business into the Grainger Industrial Supply business as well as reviewing the Company's current operating structure to ensure that it will meet the current and future needs of the business. Grainger is also evaluating the impact that this integration will have on reportable segments. Any changes to reportable segments will include a restatement of prior periods for consistency purposes. For segment and geographical information and consolidated net sales and operating earnings see
“Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”
and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Grainger has internal business support functions that provide coordination and guidance in the areas of accounting and finance, business development, communications and investor relations, compensation and benefits, information systems, health and safety, human resources, insurance and risk management, internal audit, legal, real estate, security, tax and treasury. These services are provided in varying degrees to all business units.
Grainger does not engage in product research and development activities. Items are regularly added to and deleted from Grainger’s product lines on the basis of customer demand, market research, recommendations of suppliers, sales volumes and other factors.
Grainger Branch-based
The Grainger Branch-based businesses provide customers with solutions for facilities maintenance and other product needs through logistics networks that are configured for rapid product availability. Grainger offers a broad selection of facilities maintenance and other products through local branches, catalogs and the Internet. The more significant businesses in this segment are described below.
Industrial Supply
Industrial Supply offers U.S. businesses and institutions a combination of product breadth, local availability, speed of delivery, detailed product information and competitively priced products. Industrial Supply distributes material handling equipment, safety and security supplies, lighting and electrical products, power and hand tools, pumps and plumbing supplies, cleaning and maintenance supplies and many other items primarily focused on the facilities maintenance market. Its customers range from small and medium-sized businesses to large corporations, governmental entities and other institutions. During 2008, Industrial Supply completed an average of 95,000 sales transactions daily.
Industrial Supply operates 437 branches located in all 50 states. These branches are located within 20 minutes of the majority of U.S. businesses and serve the immediate needs of their local markets by allowing customers to pick up items directly from the branches.
Branches range in size from small, will-call branches to large master branches. Branches primarily fulfill counter and will-call needs and provide customer service. An average branch is 22,000 square feet in size, has 12 employees and handles about 125 transactions per day. In 2008, Industrial Supply opened 13 branches, relocated 13, expanded or remodeled 11 and closed 10 branches.
Industrial Supply’s logistics network is comprised of nine distribution centers (DCs). Using automated equipment and processes, the DCs handle the majority of the customer shipping and replenish branch inventories.
Industrial Supply has a sales force of approximately 2,200 professionals that help businesses and institutions select the right products to reduce their operating expenses and improve cash flow, and find immediate solutions to maintenance problems.
Industrial Supply’s primary customers work in facilities maintenance departments and service
3
shops across a wide range of industries such as: manufacturing, hospitality, transportation, government, retail, healthcare and education. Sales transactions during 2008 were made to approximately 1.3 million customers. Approximately 24% of 2008 sales consisted of private label items bearing Grainger’s registered trademarks, including DAYTON® motors, SPEEDAIRE® air compressors, AIR HANDLER® air filtration equipment, DEM-KOTE® spray paints, WESTWARD® tools, CONDOR™ safety products and LUMAPRO® lighting products. Grainger has taken steps to protect these trademarks against infringement and believes that they will remain available for future use in its business. Sales of remaining items generally consisted of products carrying the names of other well-recognized brands.
The Industrial Supply catalog, most recently issued in February 2009, offers approximately 237,000 facilities maintenance and other products and is used by customers, sales representatives and branch personnel to assist in customer product selection. Approximately 2.2 million copies of the catalog were produced.
Customers can also purchase products through grainger.com. With access to more than 475,000 products, this Web site serves as a prominent service channel for Industrial Supply. Grainger.com provides real-time product availability and detailed product information and offers advanced features such as product search and compare capabilities. For customers with sophisticated electronic purchasing platforms, Grainger utilizes technology that allows these systems to communicate directly with grainger.com.
Industrial Supply purchases products for sale from approximately 1,600 key suppliers, most of which are manufacturers. No single supplier comprised more than 5% of Industrial Supply’s purchases and no significant difficulty has been encountered with respect to sources of supply.
Through a global sourcing operation, Industrial Supply procures competitively priced, high-quality products produced outside the United States from approximately 320 suppliers. Grainger businesses sell these items primarily under private labels. Products obtained through the global sourcing operation include DAYTON® motors, WESTWARD® tools, LUMAPRO® lighting products and CONDOR™ safety products, as well as products bearing other trademarks.
Mexico
Grainger’s operations in Mexico provide local businesses with facilities maintenance products and other products from both Mexico and the United States. In 2008, Mexico opened six branches and one master branch, bringing their total number of locations to 22. The business ships products to customers as well as fulfills counter and will-call needs. The largest facility, an 85,000 square foot DC, is located outside of Monterrey, Mexico. During 2008, approximately 1,000 sales transactions were completed daily. Customers have access to approximately 35,000 products through a Spanish-language catalog or through grainger.com.mx.
China
Grainger operates in China from a 126,000 square foot DC with a showroom located in Shanghai and has 10 sales offices that allow sales representatives to work remotely and meet with customers. Customers have access to approximately 50,000 products through a Chinese-language catalog or through grainger.com.cn.
Acklands – Grainger Branch-based
Acklands – Grainger is Canada’s leading broad-line distributor of industrial and safety supplies. It serves customers through 154 branches and five DCs across Canada. Acklands – Grainger distributes tools, fasteners, safety supplies, instruments, welding and shop equipment, and many other items. During 2008, approximately 14,000 sales transactions were completed daily. A comprehensive catalog, printed in both English and French, showcases the product line to facilitate the customer’s product selection. This catalog, with more than 61,000 products, is used by customers, sales account managers and branch personnel to assist in customer product selection. In addition, customers can purchase products through acklandsgrainger.com, a fully bilingual Web site.
Lab Safety
Lab Safety is a direct marketer of safety and other industrial products to U.S. and Canadian businesses. Lab Safety primarily reaches its customers through the distribution of multiple branded catalogs and other marketing materials distributed throughout the year to targeted markets. Brands include LSS, Ben Meadows (forestry), Gempler’s (agriculture), AW Direct (service vehicle accessories), Rand Materials (material handling), Professional Inspection Equipment and Construction Book Express (building and home inspection), McFeely’s Square Drive Screws (woodworking) and Highsmith (library equipment, furniture and supplies). Customers can purchase products by telephone, fax or through lss.com and other branded Web sites.
Lab Safety offers extensive product depth, technical support and high service levels. During 2008, Lab Safety issued 16 unique catalogs covering safety supplies, material handling and facilities maintenance products, lab supplies, security and other products targeted to specific customer groups. Lab Safety provides access to approximately 258,000 products through its targeted catalogs and distributes the majority of its products from a central DC.
During 2009, the Lab Safety business will be integrated into Grainger’s Branch-based Industrial Supply business. As a result of this integration, Lab Safety will no longer be reported as a separate segment.
4
Competition
Grainger faces competition in all markets it serves, from manufacturers (including some of its own suppliers) that sell directly to certain segments of the market, wholesale distributors, catalog houses and retail enterprises.
Grainger provides local product availability, a broad product line, sales representatives, competitive pricing, catalogs (which include product descriptions and, in certain cases, extensive technical and application data), electronic and Internet commerce technology and other services to assist customers in lowering their total facilities maintenance costs. Grainger believes that it can effectively compete with manufacturers on small orders, but manufacturers may have an advantage in filling large orders.
Grainger serves a number of diverse markets. Based on available data, Grainger estimates the North American market for facilities maintenance and related products to be more than $150 billion, of which Grainger’s share is approximately 4 percent. There are several large competitors, although most of the market is served by small local and regional competitors.
Employees
As of December 31, 2008, Grainger had 18,334 employees, of whom 16,374 were
full-time and 1,960 were part-time or temporary. Grainger has never had a major work stoppage and considers employee relations to be good.
Web Site Access to Company Reports
Grainger makes available, free of charge, through its Web site, its Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after this material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. This material may be accessed by visiting grainger.com/investor.
Item 1A: Risk Factors
The following is a discussion of significant risk factors relevant to Grainger’s business that could adversely affect its financial position or results of operations.
Weakness in the United States and International economies could negatively impact Grainger’s sales growth.
Economic and industry trends affect Grainger’s business environments. Economic downturns can cause customers to idle or close facilities, delay purchases and otherwise reduce their ability to purchase Grainger’s products and services as well as their ability to make full and timely payments. Thus, a significant or prolonged slowdown in economic activity could negatively impact Grainger’s sales growth and results of operations. The recent global economic crisis has had a negative effect on Grainger’s sales and could continue to do so into the future, however, the duration of this or any other economic downturn cannot be predicted.
The facilities maintenance industry is highly fragmented, and changes in competition could result in a decreased demand for Grainger’s products and services.
There are several large competitors in the industry, although most of the market is served by small local and regional competitors. Grainger faces competition in all markets it serves, from manufacturers (including some of its own suppliers) that sell directly to certain segments of the market, wholesale distributors, catalog houses and retail enterprises. Competitive pressures could adversely affect Grainger’s sales and profitability.
Volatility in commodity prices may adversely affect operating margins.
Some of Grainger’s products contain significant amounts of commodity-priced materials, such as steel, copper, or oil, and are subject to price changes based upon fluctuations in the commodities market. Grainger’s ability to pass on increases in costs depends on market conditions. The inability to pass along costs increases could result in lower operating margins. In addition, higher prices could impact demand for these products resulting in lower sales volumes.
Unexpected product shortages could negatively impact customer relationships, resulting in an adverse impact on results of operations.
Grainger’s competitive strengths include product selection and availability. Products are purchased from approximately 3,000 key suppliers, no one of which accounts for more than 5% of purchases. Historically, no significant difficulty has been encountered with respect to sources of supply, however, economic downturns can adversely affect a supplier’s ability to manufacture or deliver products. If Grainger were to experience difficulty in obtaining products, there could be a short-term adverse effect on results of operations and a longer-term adverse effect on customer relationships and Grainger’s reputation. In addition, Grainger has strategic relationships with key vendors. In the event Grainger was unable to maintain those relations, there might be a loss of competitive pricing advantages which could, in turn, adversely affect results of operations.
5
The addition of new product lines could impact future sales growth.
Grainger, from time to time, expands the breadth of its offerings by increasing the number of products it distributes. In 2006, Grainger launched a multiyear product line expansion program. The continued success of the expansion program is expected to be a driver of growth in 2009 and beyond. The success of these expansions will depend on Grainger’s ability to accurately forecast market demand, obtain products from suppliers and effectively integrate these products into the supply chain.
As such, there is a risk that the product line expansion program will not deliver the expected results which could negatively impact anticipated future sales growth.
Interruptions in the proper functioning of information systems could disrupt operations and cause unanticipated increases in costs and/or decreases in revenues.
The proper functioning of Grainger’s information systems is critical to the successful operation of its business. Although Grainger’s information systems are protected with robust backup systems, including physical and software safeguards and remote processing capabilities, information systems are still vulnerable to natural disasters, power losses, unauthorized access, telecommunication failures and other problems. If critical information systems fail or are otherwise unavailable, Grainger’s ability to process orders, maintain proper levels of inventories, collect accounts receivable, pay expenses and maintain the security of Company and customer data could be adversely affected.
In order to compete, Grainger must attract, retain and motivate key employees, and the failure to do so could have an adverse effect on results of operations.
In order to compete and have continued growth, Grainger must attract, retain and motivate executives and other key employees, including those in managerial, technical, sales, marketing and support positions. Grainger competes to hire employees and then must train them and develop their skills and competencies. Grainger’s operating results could be adversely affected by increased costs due to increased competition for employees, higher employee turnover or increased employee benefit costs.
Fluctuations in foreign currency could have an adverse effect on reported results of operations.
Foreign currency exchange rates and fluctuations may have an impact on sales, future costs or on future cash flows from international operations, and could adversely affect reported financial performance.
Item 1B: Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2: Properties
As of December 31, 2008, Grainger’s owned and leased facilities totaled 20.7 million square feet, an increase of approximately 5% from December 31, 2007. This increase primarily related to branch expansion programs in the United States and Mexico. Industrial Supply and Acklands
– Grainger
accounted for the majority of the total square footage. Industrial Supply facilities are located throughout the United States and Acklands
–
Grainger facilities are located throughout Canada.
Industrial Supply branches range in size from 1,300 to 109,000 square feet. Most are located in or near major metropolitan areas with many located in industrial parks. Typically, a branch is on one floor, consists primarily of warehouse space, sales areas and offices and has off-the-street parking for customers and employees. Grainger believes that its properties are generally in good condition and well maintained.
6
A brief description of significant facilities follows:
Location
Facility and Use (7)
Size in Square Feet (in 000’s)
United States (1)
437 Industrial Supply branch locations
9,466
United States (2)
Nine Distribution Centers
5,100
United States (3)
Other facilities
879
United States (4)
Four Lab Safety facilities
833
International (5)
Other facilities
806
Canada (6)
165 Acklands – Grainger facilities
2,303
Chicago Area
Headquarters and General Offices
1,327
Total Square Feet
20,714
(1)
Industrial Supply branches consist of 290 owned and 147 leased properties. Most leases expire
between 2009 and 2017.
(2)
These facilities are all owned.
(3)
These facilities primarily include leased locations, including storage facilities and idle properties.
(4)
Lab Safety facilities consist of general offices, distribution centers, and storage facilities, of which
one is owned and three are leased.
(5)
These facilities include owned and leased locations for Puerto Rico, Mexico, China and Panama.
(6)
Acklands – Grainger facilities consist of general offices, distribution centers and branches, of which
56 are owned and 109 leased.
(7)
Owned facilities are not subject to any mortgages.
Item 3: Legal Proceedings
Grainger has been named, along with numerous other nonaffiliated companies, as a defendant in litigation in various states involving asbestos and/or silica. These lawsuits typically assert claims of personal injury arising from alleged exposure to asbestos and/or silica as a consequence of products purportedly distributed by Grainger. As of February 3, 2009, Grainger is named in cases filed on behalf of approximately 2,200 plaintiffs in which there is an allegation of exposure to asbestos and/or silica. Grainger has denied, or intends to deny, the allegations in all of the above-described lawsuits.
In 2008, lawsuits relating to asbestos and/or silica and involving approximately 660 plaintiffs were dismissed with respect to Grainger, typically based on the lack of product identification. If a specific product distributed by Grainger is identified in any of these lawsuits, Grainger would attempt to exercise indemnification remedies against the product manufacturer. In addition, Grainger believes that a substantial number of these claims are covered by insurance. Grainger has entered agreements with its major insurance carriers relating to the scope, coverage and costs of defense. While Grainger is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, it believes that the ultimate resolution will not have, either individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on Grainger’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Grainger is a party to a contract with the United States General Services Administration (the “GSA”) first entered into in 1999 and subsequently extended in 2004. The GSA contract had been the subject of an audit performed by the GSA’s Office of the Inspector General. In December 2007, the Company received a letter from the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Civil Division of the Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) regarding the GSA contract. The letter suggested that the Company had not complied with its disclosure obligations and the contract’s pricing provisions, and had potentially overcharged government customers under the contract.
Discussions relating to the Company’s compliance with its disclosure obligations and the contract’s pricing provisions are ongoing. The timing and outcome of these discussions are uncertain and could include settlement or civil litigation by the DOJ to recover, among other amounts, treble damages and penalties under the False Claims Act. While this matter is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, an unfavorable resolution could result in significant payments by the Company. The Company continues to believe that it has complied with the GSA contract in all material respects.
In addition to the foregoing, from time to time Grainger is involved in various other legal and administrative proceedings that are incidental to its business, including claims relating to product liability, general negligence, environmental issues, employment, intellectual property and other matters. As a government contractor, Grainger is also subject to governmental or regulatory inquiries or audits or other proceedings, including those related to pricing compliance. It is not expected that the ultimate resolution of any of these matters will have, either individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on Grainger’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
7
Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2008.
Executive Officers
Following is information about the Executive Officers of Grainger including age as of February 26, 2009. Executive Officers of Grainger generally serve until the next annual election of officers, or until earlier resignation or removal.
Name and Age
Positions and Offices Held and Principal
Occupation and Employment During the Past Five Years
Court D. Carruthers (36)
Senior Vice President of Grainger, a position assumed in 2007, and President of Acklands –
Grainger Inc., a position assumed in 2006. Previously, Mr. Carruthers served as Vice President, National Accounts
and Sales of Acklands –Grainger Inc., a position assumed in 2002 when he joined that company.
Nancy A. Hobor (62)
Senior Vice President, Communications and Investor Relations, a position assumed in 1999.
John L. Howard (51)
Senior Vice President and General Counsel, a position assumed in 2000.
Gregory S. Irving (50)
Vice President and Controller, a position assumed in 2008. Previously, Mr. Irving served as Vice President, Finance, for Acklands - Grainger Inc. since 2004. After joining Grainger in 1999 he served in various management positions including Vice President, Financial Services and Director, Internal Audit.
Ronald L. Jadin (48)
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, a position assumed in 2008. Previously, Mr. Jadin served as Vice President and Controller, a position assumed in 2006 after serving as Vice President, Finance. Upon joining Grainger in 1998, he served as Director, Financial Planning and Analysis.
Richard L. Keyser (66)
Chairman of the Board, a position assumed in 1997. From 1995 through 2008, Mr. Keyser served as Grainger's Chief Executive Officer. He joined Grainger in 1986 and became a director in 1992.
Larry J. Loizzo (54)
Vice President, Specialty Brands, a position assumed in 2009 and President of Lab Safety Supply, Inc., a position assumed in 1996. Previously, Mr. Loizzo was Senior Vice President of Grainger, a position assumed in 2003.
Donald G. Macpherson (41)
Senior Vice President, Global Supply Chain, a position assumed in 2008. Mr. Macpherson joined Grainger in 2008 as Senior Vice President, Supply Chain. Before joining Grainger, he was Partner and Managing Director of the Boston Consulting Group, a global management consulting firm and advisor on business strategy.
Michael A. Pulick (44)
Senior Vice President and President, Grainger U.S., a position assumed in 2008 after serving as Senior Vice President of Customer Service, a position assumed in 2006. After joining Grainger in 1999, Mr. Pulick has held a number of increasingly responsible positions in Grainger’s supplier and product management areas including Vice President, Product Management and Vice President, Merchandising.
James T. Ryan (50)
President and Chief Executive Officer of Grainger, a position assumed in 2008. Mr. Ryan became a director in 2007. Previously he had been Grainger’s President and Chief Operating Officer. Before assuming that position in 2007, Mr. Ryan served as President, a position assumed in 2006, and served as Group President since 2004. Since joining Grainger in 1980, he has served in increasingly responsible roles, including Executive Vice President, Marketing, Sales and Service; Vice President, Information Services; President, grainger.com; and President, Grainger Parts.
8
PART II
Item 5: Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information and Dividends
Grainger’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange and the Chicago Stock Exchange, with the ticker symbol GWW. The high and low sales prices for the common stock and the dividends declared and paid for each calendar quarter during 2008 and 2007 are
shown below.
Prices
Quarters
High
Low
Dividends
2008
First
$
87.92
$
69.00
$
0.35
Second
93.12
75.94
0.40
Third
93.99
79.66
0.40
Fourth
86.90
58.86
0.40
Year
$
93.99
$
58.86
$
1.55
2007
First
$
80.37
$
68.77
$
0.29
Second
94.75
76.00
0.35
Third
98.60
79.38
0.35
Fourth
96.00
84.40
0.35
Year
$
98.60
$
68.77
$
1.34
Grainger expects that its practice of paying quarterly dividends on its Common Stock will continue, although the payment of future dividends is at the discretion of Grainger’s Board of Directors and will depend upon Grainger’s earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and other factors.
Holders
The approximate number of shareholders of record of Grainger’s common stock as of January 31, 2009, was 1,050 with approximately 70,000 additional shareholders holding stock through nominees.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities – Fourth Quarter
Period
Total Number
of Shares Purchased (A)
Average Price Paid
per Share (B)
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (C)
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Oct. 1 – Oct. 31
-
-
-
8,811,100
shares
Nov. 1 – Nov. 30
-
-
-
8,811,100
shares
Dec. 1 – Dec. 31
1,409,274
$73.47
1,409,274
7,401,826
shares
Total
1,409,274
$73.47
1,409,274
(A)
There were no shares withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of employee restricted stock awards.
(B)
Average price paid per share includes any commissions paid and includes only those amounts related to purchases as part of publicly announced plans or programs. Activity is reported on a trade date basis.
(C)
Purchases were made through a share repurchase program approved by Grainger’s Board of Directors. On April 30, 2008, Grainger announced that its Board of Directors granted authority to repurchase up to 10 million shares. The program has no specified expiration date. No share repurchase plan or program expired or was terminated during the period covered by this report.
Company Performance
The following stock price performance graph compares the cumulative total return on an investment in Grainger common stock with the cumulative total return of an investment in each of the S&P 500 Stock Index and the Dow Jones Wilshire 5000 Industrial Supplier Index. It covers the period commencing December 31, 2003, and ending
9
December 31, 2008. The graph assumes that the value for the investment in Grainger common stock and in each index was $100 on December 31, 2003, and that all dividends were reinvested.
December 31,
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
$
100
$
143
$
155
$
154
$
196
$
180
S&P 500 Stock Index
100
111
116
135
142
90
Dow Jones Wilshire 5000
Industrial Supplier Index
100
135
152
157
180
140
Other
On May 30, 2008, Grainger timely submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) an Annual CEO Certification, in which Grainger’s Chief Executive Officer certified that he was not aware of any violation by Grainger of the NYSE’s corporate governance listing standards as of the date of the certification.
Item 6: Selected Financial Data
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
(In thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts)
Net sales
$
6,850,032
$
6,418,014
$
5,883,654
$
5,526,636
$
5,049,785
Net earnings
475,355
420,120
383,399
346,324
286,923
Net earnings per basic share
6.21
5.10
4.36
3.87
3.18
Net earnings per diluted share
6.04
4.94
4.24
3.78
3.13
Total assets
3,515,417
3,094,028
3,046,088
3,107,921
2,809,573
Long-term debt (less current maturities)
488,228
4,895
4,895
4,895
–
Cash dividends paid per share
$
1.550
$
1.340
$
1.110
$
0.920
$
0.785
The results for 2006 included an effective tax rate, excluding the equity in net income of unconsolidated entities, of 36.7%, compared to 38.5% in 2007. The 2006 rate included tax benefits from the resolution of uncertainties related to the audit of the 2004 tax year and a tax benefit from a reduction of deferred tax liabilities related to property, buildings and equipment. These benefits increased diluted earnings per share by $0.15.
Effective January 1, 2006, Grainger adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” for the accounting of employee stock-based compensation using the modified prospective method. The effect of the adoption was an approximately $0.14 earnings per share reduction for 2006. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of information related to SFAS No. 123R.
The results for 2005 included an effective tax rate, excluding the equity in net income of unconsolidated entities, of 35.2%. The 2005 rate included tax benefits related to a favorable revision to the estimate of income taxes for various state taxing jurisdictions and the resolution of certain federal and state tax contingencies. These benefits increased diluted earnings per share by $0.10.
10
The results for 2004 included an effective tax rate, excluding the equity in net income of unconsolidated entities, of 35.6%, which was down from 40.0% in the prior year. The lower tax rate resulted in an increase of $0.21 per diluted share. The tax rate reduction was primarily due to a lower tax rate in Canada, the realization of tax benefits related to operations in Mexico and to capital losses, the recognition of tax benefits from the “Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” and the resolution of certain federal and state tax contingencies.
For further information see
“
Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
.”
Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
General.
Grainger distributes facilities maintenance products and provides services and related information used by businesses and institutions primarily in the United States, Canada and Mexico to keep their facilities and equipment running. Grainger reports its operating results in three segments: Grainger Branch-based, Acklands – Grainger Branch-based (Acklands – Grainger) and Lab Safety Supply, Inc. (Lab Safety). Grainger distributes a wide range of products used by businesses and institutions to keep their facilities and equipment up and running. Grainger uses a multichannel business model to provide customers with a range of options for finding and purchasing products through a network of branches, sales representatives, direct marketing including catalogs, and a variety of electronic and Internet channels. Grainger serves customers through 617 branches, 18 distribution centers and multiple Web sites.
Business Environment.
Several economic factors and industry trends shape Grainger’s business environment. The current overall economy and leading economic indicators provide insight into anticipated economic factors for the near term and help in forming the development of projections for the upcoming year. In February 2009, Consensus Forecast-USA projected a 2009 GDP decline of 2.1% and an Industrial Production decline of 7.2% for the United States, as compared to 2008 GDP growth of 1.3% and a 1.7% decline in Industrial Production. In February 2009, Consensus Forecast-USA projected a GDP decline of 1.1% for Canada, as compared to the 2008 growth estimate of 0.6%.
Historically, Grainger’s sales trends have tended to correlate positively with industrial production growth and non-farm payrolls. In more recent years, Grainger’s sales growth in the United States has outperformed both economic indicators. For the first five months of 2008, Grainger benefited from the growth in industrial production and non-farm payrolls. Both economic indicators began to deteriorate in May 2008, however, Grainger continued to outperform both until late 2008, at which time Grainger’s sales began to be negatively affected by the economic downturn.
The light and heavy manufacturing customer sectors, which comprised approximately 25% of Grainger’s total 2008 sales, have historically correlated with manufacturing employment levels and manufacturing production. Manufacturing employment levels in the United States declined approximately 5.7% from December 2007 to December 2008, while manufacturing output decreased 9.9% from December 2007 to December 2008. This decline in manufacturing employment and output contributed to low single-digit sales growth in the light manufacturing customer sector and flat sales growth in the heavy manufacturing customer sector for Grainger in 2008.
Given the steep decline in the economic trends in Grainger’s markets in the fourth quarter of 2008, it is difficult to project future results. During the fourth quarter, Grainger began implementing contingency plans to deal with the changing environment, which included a hiring freeze on all non-customer-facing positions, a reduction in hours of part-time employees and a significant reduction to travel, consulting and relocation expenses. In response to a continuing decline in sales, on February 11, 2009, Grainger announced plans to freeze salaries of all executives and salaried employees and indicated that the payment of management incentive bonuses for 2009 would occur only if Grainger meets aggressive sales targets. Additionally, Grainger announced 300 to 400 jobs would be eliminated as a result of lower sales volume and the combination of its Lab Safety Supply and Grainger Industrial Supply businesses, resulting in annualized cost savings of between $25 million and $35 million. See Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2004, Grainger launched a multiyear market expansion program in the United States to strengthen its presence in top metropolitan markets and better position itself to serve the local customer. The expansion program was completed in 2008, however, the benefits realized from this initiative are expected to continue.
In 2006, Grainger launched a multiyear product line expansion program in the United States. Over the past three years, Grainger has added over 150,000 new products to supplement Industrial Supply’s plumbing, fastener, material handling and security product lines. The product line expansion program contributed to the sales growth in 2007 and 2008, and is expected to be a driver of growth in 2009 and beyond. In 2009, Grainger expects to add 50,000 new products to further supplement Industrial Supply’s product lines.
Grainger’s financial strength enables it to fund major initiatives, acquisitions and productivity improvements. Capital spending in 2008 for the U.S. market expansion program was approximately $40 million, with total capital expenditures of $196 million.
Capital expenditures are expected to range from $175 million to $200 million in 2009. Projected investments include improved infrastructure in distribution centers, both in the U.S. and Canada, information technology, including
11
upgraded electronic commerce platforms, and the normal recurring replacement of equipment. Grainger expects to fund 2009 capital investments from operating cash flows, with spending planned for the following major projects:
·
$90 million to $105 million for supply chain infrastructure;
·
$15 million to $35 million for information technology.
Matters Affecting Comparability.
There were 256 sales days in 2008, compared to 255 sales days in 2007 and 254 sales days in 2006.
Since June 2008, Grainger’s operating results have included the operating results of Excel F.I.G. Inc. (Excel) in the Acklands – Grainger segment, and since July 2008 Grainger’s operating results have included the operating results of Highsmith Inc. (Highsmith) in the Lab Safety segment.
Since May 2007, Grainger’s operating results have included the operating results of McFeely’s Square Drive Screws (McFeely’s) in the Lab Safety segment.
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding business acquisitions.
Results of Operations
The following table is included as an aid to understanding changes in Grainger’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings:
For the Years Ended December 31,
As a Percent of Net Sales
Percent Increase/(Decrease)
from Prior Year
2008
2007
2006
2008
2007
Net sales
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
6.7
%
9.1
%
Cost of merchandise sold
59.0
59.4
60.0
6.0
8.1
Gross profit
41.0
40.6
40.0
7.9
10.6
Operating expenses
29.6
30.1
30.2
4.8
8.8
Operating earnings
11.4
10.5
9.8
16.7
16.0
Other income (expense)
(0.1
)
0.2
0.4
(184.3
)
(55.1
)
Income taxes
4.4
4.1
3.7
13.8
19.2
Net earnings
6.9
%
6.6
%
6.5
%
13.1
%
9.6
%
2008 Compared to 2007
Grainger’s net sales of $6,850.0 million for 2008 increased 6.7% when compared with net sales of $6,418.0 million for 2007. There was one more selling day in 2008 versus 2007. Daily sales were up 6.3%. The increase in net sales was led by high single-digit sales growth in the government sector, and mid single-digit sales growth in the commercial and reseller sectors. Approximately 1 percentage point of the sales growth came from Grainger’s product line expansion initiative and approximately 5 percentage points came from price and volume. Refer to the
Segment Analysis
below for further detail of Grainger’s ongoing strategic initiatives.
The gross profit margin for 2008 improved 0.4 percentage point to 41.0% from 40.6% in 2007. The improvement in the gross profit margin was primarily driven by positive inflation recovery, partially offset by unfavorable selling price category mix.
Operating earnings of $782.7 million for 2008 increased 16.7% over the $670.7 million for 2007. This earnings improvement exceeded the sales growth rate due to an improved gross profit margin and positive operating expense leverage.
Net earnings for 2008 increased by 13.1% to $475.4 million from $420.1 million in 2007. The growth in net earnings for 2008 primarily resulted from the improvement in operating earnings, partially offset by lower interest income, higher interest expense and the write-off of Grainger’s $6.0 million investment in Asia Pacific Brands India Ltd. (Asia Pacific Brands). Diluted earnings per share of $6.04 in 2008 were 22.3% higher than the $4.94 for 2007. This improvement was higher than the percentage increase for net earnings due to the effect of Grainger’s share repurchase program.
Segment Analysis
The following comments at the segment level include external and intersegment net sales and operating earnings. Comments at the business unit level include external and inter- and intrasegment net sales and operating earnings. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Grainger Branch-based
Net sales were $5,678.8 million for 2008, an increase of $326.3 million, or 6.1%, when compared with net sales of $5,352.5 million for 2007. Daily sales were up 5.7%. Daily sales in the United States were up 5.5%. Sales were led by high single-digit sales growth in the government sector, and mid single-digit sales growth in the commercial and
12
reseller sectors. Approximately 2 percentage points of the sales growth came from Grainger’s product line expansion initiative and approximately 4 percentage points came from price and volume. Sales volume was negatively affected by approximately 1 percentage point due to a decline in sales of seasonal products.
In 2004, Grainger launched a multiyear market expansion program to strengthen its presence in top metropolitan markets and better position itself to serve local customers. The market expansion program was completed in 2008, however, the benefits realized from this initiative are expected to continue.
Consistent with the overall downturn in the economy, beginning in October most of these markets saw negative sales growth, which significantly affected sales growth for 2008. Results for the market expansion program were as follows:
Daily Sales
Increase
2008 vs. 2007
Phase 1 (Atlanta, Denver, Seattle)
7%
Phase 2 (Four markets in Southern California)
5%
Phase 3 (Houston, St. Louis, Tampa)
10%
Phase 4 (Baltimore, Cincinnati, Kansas City,
Miami, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C.)
2%
Phase 5 (Dallas, Detroit, New York, Phoenix)
3%
Phase 6 (Chicago, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh,
San Francisco)
6%
Over the past three years, Grainger has added over 150,000 new products to supplement Industrial Supply’s plumbing, fastener, material handling and security product lines as part of its ongoing product line expansion initiative. The most recent catalog, issued in 2009, offers a total of 237,000 products, an increase of 50,000 products over the 2008 catalog.
Sales in Mexico increased 11.9% in 2008 versus 2007. Daily sales were up 11.5%. In local currency, daily sales were up 12.7%, driven primarily by increased market share coming from the ongoing branch expansion program.
The segment gross profit margin increased 0.5 percentage point in 2008 over 2007, driven primarily by positive inflation recovery, partially offset by unfavorable selling price category mix.
Operating expenses in this segment were up 3.4% in 2008. Expenses grew at a slower rate than sales primarily due to lower advertising expenses, bonus accruals, severance and lower bad debt expense, the result of improved collection efficiency.
For the segment, operating earnings of $782.7 million for 2008 increased 16.9% over the $669.4 million for 2007. This earnings improvement exceeded the sales growth rate due to an improved gross profit margin and positive operating expense leverage.
Acklands
–
Grainger Branch-based
Net sales at Acklands – Grainger were $728.0 million for 2008, an increase of $91.5 million, or 14.4%, when compared with $636.5 million for 2007. Daily sales were up 13.9%. In local currency, daily sales increased 13.1%.
The increase was led by sales growth in the contractor, agriculture and mining and government sectors.
The gross profit margin increased 0.3 percentage points in 2008 over 2007. The improvement in the gross profit margin was primarily due to positive inflation recovery.
Operating expenses were up 13.7% in 2008. The increase in operating expenses was primarily due to payroll and benefits as a result of increased headcount, merit increases and commissions, and higher advertising and occupancy expenses, and expenses related to the bankruptcy of a provider of freight payment services.
Operating earnings of $54.3 million for 2008 were up $10.0 million, or 22.7%. This earnings improvement exceeded the sales growth rate due to an improved gross profit margin and operating expenses that grew at a slower rate than sales.
Lab Safety
Net sales at Lab Safety were $450.7 million for 2008, an increase of $16.0 million, or 3.7%, when compared with $434.7 million for 2007. Daily sales were up 3.3%. Excluding sales from the Highsmith acquisition, sales declined 3.3%.
The gross profit margin decreased 0.6 percentage point in 2008 over 2007, driven primarily by unfavorable selling price category mix and product mix.
Operating expenses were up 10.0% in 2008. Expenses grew at a faster rate than sales primarily due to costs associated with the Highsmith acquisition.
Operating earnings of $45.4 million for 2008 were down 16.4% over 2007. Operating earnings were down as a result of lower gross profit margins and higher operating expenses.
13
Other Income and Expense
Other income and expense was $9.5 million of expense in 2008, a decrease of $20.7 million as compared with $11.2 million of income in 2007. The following table summarizes the components of other income and expense (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
Other income and (expense):
Interest income (expense) – net
$
(9,416
)
$
9,151
Equity in net income of unconsolidated
entities
3,642
2,016
Write-off of investment in unconsolidated entity
(6,031
)
–
Unclassified – net
2,351
41
$
(9,454
)
$
11,208
The change from net interest income to net interest expense was primarily attributable to the four-year bank term loan obtained in May 2008. The write-off of the investment relates to Asia Pacific Brands as described in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Unclassified – net increased primarily due to higher foreign exchange transaction gains.
Income Taxes
Income taxes of $297.9 million in 2008 increased 13.8% as compared with $261.7 million in 2007.
Grainger’s effective tax rates were 38.5% and 38.4% in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Excluding the effect of after tax items related to the write-off and the earnings of unconsolidated entities, the effective income tax rates were 38.4% and 38.5% for 2008 and 2007, respectively.
For 2009, Grainger is projecting its estimated effective tax rate to be approximately 38.9%, excluding equity in net income of unconsolidated entities.
2007 Compared to 2006
Grainger’s net sales of $6,418.0 million for 2007 increased 9.1% when compared with net sales of $5,883.7 million for 2006. There was one more selling day in 2007 versus 2006. Daily sales were up 8.7%. The increase in net sales was led by sales growth in the upper teens in the government sector, high single-digit sales growth in the commercial sector and mid single-digit sales growth in the manufacturing sector. Approximately 3 percentage points of the sales growth came from Grainger’s ongoing strategic initiatives, market expansion and product line expansion, with another 1 percentage point from foreign exchange. Partially offsetting these sales improvements was a negative 1 percentage point effect from the continued wind-down of low margin integrated supply contracts. Refer to the
Segment Analysis
below for further detail of Grainger’s ongoing strategic initiatives.
The gross profit margin for 2007 improved 0.6 percentage point to 40.6% from 40.0% in 2006. The improvement in the gross profit margin was primarily driven by positive inflation recovery, partially offset by unfavorable selling price category mix.
Operating earnings for 2007 totaled $670.7 million, an increase of 16.0% over 2006. This earnings improvement exceeded the sales growth rate due to an improved gross profit margin and operating expenses which grew at a slightly slower rate than sales.
Net earnings for 2007 increased by 9.6% to $420.1 million from $383.4 million in 2006. The growth in net earnings for 2007 primarily resulted from the improvement in operating earnings, partially offset by lower interest income, no counterpart to a gain on the sale of Acklands – Grainger’s interest in the USI-AGI Prairies joint venture in 2006, and a higher effective tax rate in 2007. The results for 2006 included tax benefits from the resolution of uncertainties related to the audit of the 2004 tax year and a tax benefit from a reduction of deferred tax liabilities related to property, buildings and equipment. These benefits increased diluted earnings per share by $0.15 in 2006. Diluted earnings per share of $4.94 in 2007 were 16.5% higher than the $4.24 for 2006. This improvement was higher than the percentage increase for net earnings due to the effect of Grainger’s share repurchase program.
Segment Analysis
The following comments at the segment level include external and intersegment net sales and operating earnings. Comments at the business unit level include external and inter- and intrasegment net sales and operating earnings. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
14
Grainger Branch-based
Net sales were $5,352.5 million for 2007, an increase of $441.7 million, or 9.0%, when compared with net sales of $4,910.8 million for 2006. Daily sales were up 8.6%. Daily sales in the United States were up 8.5%, with growth in all customer end markets, led by sales growth in the upper teens in the government sector and high single-digit sales growth in the commercial sector. Approximately 4 percentage points of the sales growth came from Grainger’s ongoing strategic initiatives, market expansion and product line expansion. The wind-down of Grainger’s low margin integrated supply contracts reduced sales growth by approximately 1 percentage point.
In 2004, Grainger launched a multiyear market expansion program to strengthen its presence in top metropolitan markets and better position itself to serve local customers.
Market expansion contributed approximately 2 percentage points to the sales growth for the segment. Results for the market expansion program were as follows:
Daily Sales
Increase
2007 vs. 2006
Estimated
Percent
Complete
Phase 1 (Atlanta, Denver, Seattle)
15%
100%
Phase 2 (Four markets in Southern California)
6%
100%
Phase 3 (Houston, St. Louis, Tampa)
13%
100%
Phase 4 (Baltimore, Cincinnati, Kansas City,
Miami, Philadelphia, Washington, D.C.)
10%
100%
Phase 5 (Dallas, Detroit, New York, Phoenix)
9%
75%
Phase 6 (Chicago, Minneapolis, Pittsburgh,
San Francisco)
9%
65%
Product line expansion contributed approximately 2 percentage points to the growth in the segment. Over the past two years, Grainger has added approximately 90,000 new products in the plumbing, fastener, material handling and security product lines as part of its ongoing product line expansion initiative.
Daily sales in Mexico increased 22.7% in 2007 versus 2006. In local currency, daily sales were up 22.8%, driven primarily by the ongoing branch expansion program and an improved economy.
The segment gross profit margin increased 0.4 percentage point in 2007 over 2006, driven primarily by positive inflation recovery, partially offset by unfavorable selling price category mix.
Operating expenses in this segment were up 9.0% in 2007. Expenses grew at the same rate as sales with payroll and benefits growing at a slower rate than sales offset by other operating expenses growing faster than sales, primarily due to increased bad debt expense and provisions and higher facility costs related to market expansion.
For the segment, operating earnings of $669.4 million for 2007 increased 12.8% over the $593.5 million for 2006. This earnings improvement exceeded the sales growth rate due to an improved gross profit margin.
Acklands
–
Grainger Branch-based
Net sales at Acklands – Grainger were $636.5 million for 2007, an increase of $71.4 million, or 12.6%, when compared with $565.1 million for 2006. Daily sales were up 12.2%. In local currency, daily sales increased 5.8% due to a stronger economy. This increase was led by the mining sector with sales growth in the low twenties, high single-digit sales growth in the oil sector and mid single-digit sales growth in the government sector. These increases were partially offset by a mid-teens sales decline in the forestry sector.
The gross profit margin increased 2.6 percentage points in 2007 over 2006. The improvement in the gross profit margin was primarily due to positive inflation recovery.
Operating expenses were up 6.7% in 2007. Expenses grew at a slower rate than sales due to operating expense leverage, the result of improved cost management and lower severance costs.
Operating earnings of $44.2 million for 2007 were up $29.0 million, or 190%. This earnings improvement exceeded the sales growth rate due to an improved gross profit margin and operating expenses that grew at a slower rate than sales.
Lab Safety
Net sales at Lab Safety were $434.7 million for 2007, an increase of $23.2 million, or 5.6%, when compared with $411.5 million for 2006. Daily sales were up 5.2%. Sales from the acquisitions made during 2007 and late 2006 contributed 6.1 percentage points to the growth.
The gross profit margin decreased 0.5 percentage point in 2007 over 2006. Gross profit margin was down as a result of increased freight costs and unfavorable selling price category mix and product mix, partially offset by positive inflation recovery.
Operating expenses were 4.6% higher in 2007 and grew at a slower rate than sales due to cost management efforts.
Operating earnings of $54.3 million for 2007 were up 3.8% over 2006. This earnings improvement was less than the sales growth rate primarily due to a lower gross profit margin.
15
Other Income and Expense
Other income and expense was $11.2 million of income in 2007, a decrease of $13.8 million as compared with $25.0 million of income in 2006. The following table summarizes the components of other income and expense (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2007
2006
Other income and (expense):
Interest income (expense) – net
$
9,151
$
19,570
Equity in net income of unconsolidated
entities
2,016
2,960
Gain on sale of unconsolidated entity
–
2,291
Unclassified – net
41
131
$
11,208
$
24,952
The decrease in interest income was primarily attributable to lower average cash balances due to working capital needs and share repurchases. There was a decrease in equity in net income of unconsolidated entities in 2007 versus 2006 primarily driven by the absence of earnings related to the joint venture that was sold.
Income Taxes
Income taxes of $261.7 million in 2007 increased 19.2% as compared with $219.6 million in 2006.
Grainger’s effective tax rates were 38.4% and 36.4% in 2007 and 2006, respectively. Excluding the equity in net income of unconsolidated entities, the effective income tax rates were 38.5% for 2007 and 36.7% for 2006.
The 2006 tax rate benefited from resolution of uncertainties related to the audit of the 2004 tax year and from a reduction of deferred tax liabilities related to property, buildings and equipment.
Excluding the equity in net income of unconsolidated entities and the tax benefits noted above, the effective income tax rate for 2006 was 38.9%.
Financial Condition
Grainger expects its strong working capital position, cash flows from operations and borrowing capacity to continue, allowing it to fund its operations, including growth initiatives, capital expenditures, acquisitions and repurchase of shares, as well as pay cash dividends.
Cash Flow
Net cash flows from operations of $530.1 million in 2008, $468.9 million in 2007 and $436.8 million in 2006 continued to improve Grainger’s financial position and serve as the primary source of funding. Net cash provided by operations increased $61.2 million in 2008 over 2007, driven primarily by increased net earnings. The Change in operating assets and liabilities – net of business acquisitions used cash of $143.1 million in 2008. This use of cash was driven primarily by an increase in inventory due to the product line expansion initiative.
The increase in net cash flows from operations from 2006 to 2007 of $32.1 million was primarily attributable to increased net earnings. The Change in operating assets and liabilities – net of business acquisitions used cash of $106.4 million in 2007. This use of cash was primarily driven by increases in inventory and trade accounts receivable as well as a decrease in trade accounts payable due to the timing of payments at year-end. The increases in inventory and trade accounts receivable were due to product line expansion and increased sales. These changes were partially offset by an increase in other current liabilities due to higher compensation, benefit and profit sharing accruals, the result of increased headcount and improved Company performance.
Net cash flows used in investing activities were $202.6 million, $197.0 million and $139.7 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Cash expended for property, buildings, equipment and capitalized software was $195.0 million, $197.4 million and $136.8 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Additional information regarding capital spending is detailed in the
Capital Expenditures
section below. In 2008, Grainger continued to fund the Company’s market expansion initiative ($40 million) and acquired two companies, Highsmith and Excel ($34.3 million). In 2007, Grainger funded the market expansion initiative ($88 million), purchased McFeely’s ($4.7 million) and purchased its distribution center in China ($6.7 million).
Net cash flows used in financing activities for 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $36.8 million, $513.9 million and $492.9 million, respectively. Treasury stock purchases were $394.2 million in 2008 as Grainger repurchased 5.5 million shares compared to purchases of $647.3 million in 2007 to repurchase 7.2 million shares. As of December 31, 2008, approximately 7.4 million shares of common stock remained available under Grainger’s repurchase authorization. Dividends paid to shareholders were $121.5 million in 2008 versus $113.1 million in 2007. Grainger also used cash in
16
financing activities to pay off $81.4 million of short-term borrowings versus an increase in short-term borrowings of $102.3 million in 2007. Partially offsetting these cash outlays were proceeds of long-term borrowings of $500 million in 2008, as well as proceeds and excess tax benefits realized from stock options exercised of $60.4 million in 2008 versus $144.2 million in 2007.
Treasury stock purchases were $472.8 million for 7.0 million shares and dividends paid to shareholders were $97.9 million in 2006. Partially offsetting these cash outlays was proceeds and excess tax benefits realized from stock options exercised of $77.8 million for 2006.
Working Capital
Internally generated funds have been the primary source of working capital and of funds used in business expansion, supplemented by debt as circumstances dictated. In addition, funds were expended for facilities optimization and enhancements to support growth initiatives, as well as for business and systems development and other infrastructure improvements.
Working capital was $1,382.4 million at December 31, 2008, compared with $974.4 million at December 31, 2007 and $1,155.8 million at December 31, 2006. At these dates, the ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 2.8, 2.2 and 2.6. The increase in the current ratio and working capital for 2008 primarily relates to increases in cash and inventories and the replacement of short-term borrowings with long-term borrowings.
Capital Expenditures
In each of the past three years, a portion of operating cash flow has been used for additions to property, buildings, equipment and capitalized software as summarized in the following table (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Land, buildings, structures and improvements
$
107,688
$
100,380
$
67,554
Furniture, fixtures, machinery and equipment
76,163
87,389
62,233
Subtotal
183,851
187,769
129,787
Capitalized software
12,297
8,556
8,950
Total
$
196,148
$
196,325
$
138,737
In 2008, Grainger completed its investments in the market expansion program in the United States which realigned branches in the top 25 major metropolitan areas. In addition, there was continued international investment, including branch expansion in Mexico, as well as the normal recurring replacement of equipment.
In 2007 and 2006, Grainger’s investments included the market expansion program, Mexico and China expansion and the normal recurring replacement of equipment.
Capital expenditures are expected to range from $175 million to $200 million in 2009. Projected investments include improved infrastructure in distribution centers, both in the U.S. and Canada, information technology, including upgraded electronic commerce platforms, and the normal recurring replacement of equipment. Grainger expects to fund 2009 capital investments from operating cash flows.
Debt
Grainger maintains a debt ratio and liquidity position that provides flexibility in funding working capital needs and long-term cash requirements. In addition to internally generated funds, Grainger has various sources of financing available, including bank borrowings under lines of credit. A four-year bank term loan of $500 million was obtained in May 2008. At December 31, 2008, Grainger’s long-term debt rating by Standard & Poor’s was AA+. Grainger’s available lines of credit, as further discussed in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, were $250.0 million at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. Total debt as a percent of total capitalization was 20.7%, 5.0% and 0.4% as of the same dates. The increase in total debt as a percent of total capitalization in 2008 was primarily the result of the $500 million bank term loan. Grainger believes any circumstances that would trigger early payment or acceleration with respect to any outstanding debt securities would not have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.
17
Commitments and Other Contractual Obligations
At December 31, 2008, Grainger’s contractual obligations, including estimated payments due by period, are as follows
(in thousands of dollars)
:
Payments Due by Period
Total Amounts Committed
Less than 1 Year
1 – 3 Years
4 – 5 Years
More than 5 Years
Long-term debt obligations
$
509,485
$
21,257
$
100,728
$
387,500
$
–
Interest on long-term debt
18,538
6,130
10,782
1,626
–
Operating lease obligations
218,375
41,150
66,471
49,917
60,837
Purchase obligations:
Uncompleted additions to
property, buildings and equipment
17,916
17,916
–
–
–
Commitments to purchase
inventory
187,526
187,498
28
–
–
Other purchase obligations
80,938
68,665
11,181
1,092
–
Other liabilities
171,489
7,408
15,181
17,329
131,571
Total
$
1,204,267
$
350,024
$
204,371
$
457,464
$
192,408
Purchase obligations for inventory are made in the normal course of business to meet operating needs. While purchase orders for both inventory purchases and noninventory purchases are generally cancelable without penalty, certain vendor agreements provide for cancellation fees or penalties depending on the terms of the contract.
Other liabilities represent future benefit payments for postretirement benefit plans and postemployment disability medical benefits as determined by actuarial projections. Other employment-related benefits costs of $31.0 million have not been included in this table as the timing of benefit payments is not statistically predictable. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
See also Notes 9 and 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail related to the interest on long-term debt and operating lease obligations, respectively.
Grainger has recorded a noncurrent liability of $26.3 million for tax uncertainties and interest at December 31, 2008. This amount is excluded from the table above, as Grainger cannot make reliable estimates of these cash flows by period. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Grainger does not have any material exposures to off-balance sheet arrangements. Grainger does not have any variable interest entities or activities that include non-exchange-traded contracts accounted for at fair value.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses in the financial statements. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions, which it believes are reasonable. If actual amounts are ultimately different from these estimates, the revisions are included in Grainger’s results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known.
Accounting policies are considered critical when they require management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimates are made and when there are different estimates that management reasonably could have made, which would have a material impact on the presentation of Grainger’s financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations.
Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The most significant areas involving management judgments and estimates follow. Actual results in these areas could differ materially from management’s estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
.
Grainger uses several factors to estimate the allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable including the age of the receivables and the historical ratio of actual write-offs to the age of the receivables. The analyses performed also take into consideration economic conditions that may have an impact on a specific industry, group of customers or a specific customer.
18
Write-offs could be materially different than the reserves provided if economic conditions change or actual results deviate from historical trends.
Inventory Reserves.
Grainger establishes inventory reserves for shrinkage and excess and obsolete inventory. Provisions for inventory shrinkage are based on historical experience to account for unmeasured usage or loss. Actual inventory shrinkage could be materially different from these estimates, affecting Grainger’s inventory values and cost of merchandise sold.
Grainger regularly reviews inventory to evaluate continued demand and identify any obsolete or excess quantities of inventory. Grainger records provisions for the difference between excess and obsolete inventory and its estimated realizable value. Estimated realizable value is based on anticipated future product demand, market conditions and liquidation values. Actual results differing from these projections could have a material effect on Grainger’s results of operations.
Stock Incentive Plans.
Grainger maintains stock incentive plans under which a variety of incentive grants may be awarded to employees and directors. Grainger uses a binomial lattice option pricing model to estimate the value of stock option grants. The model requires projections of the risk-free interest rate, expected life, volatility, expected dividend yield and forfeiture rate of the stock option grants. The fair value estimate of options granted used the following assumptions:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Risk-free interest rate
3.2
%
4.6
%
4.9
%
Expected life
6 years
6 years
6 years
Expected volatility
25.2
%
24.3
%
23.9
%
Expected dividend yield
1.8
%
1.7
%
1.5
%
The risk-free interest rate is selected based on yields from U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term approximately equal to the expected term of the options being valued. The expected life selected for options granted during each year presented represents the period of time that the options are expected to be outstanding based on historical data of option holders exercise and termination behavior. Expected volatility is based upon implied and historical volatility of the closing price of Grainger’s stock over a period equal to the expected life of each option grant. The dividend yield assumption is based on history and expectation of dividend payouts. Because stock option compensation expense is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures, using historical forfeiture experience.
The amount of stock option compensation expense is significantly affected by the valuation model and these assumptions. If a different valuation model or different assumptions were used, the stock option compensation expense could be significantly different from what is recorded in the current period.
Compensation expense for other stock-based awards is based upon the closing market price on the last trading date preceding the date of the grant.
For additional information concerning stock incentive plans, see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Postretirement Healthcare Benefits
.
Postretirement healthcare obligations and net periodic costs are dependent on assumptions and estimates used in calculating such amounts. The assumptions used include, among others, discount rates, assumed rates of return on plan assets and healthcare cost trend rates. Changes in assumptions (caused by conditions in equity markets or plan experience, for example) could have a material effect on Grainger’s postretirement benefit obligations and expense, and could affect its results of operations and financial condition. These changes in assumptions may also affect voluntary decisions to make additional contributions to the trust established for funding the postretirement benefit obligation.
The discount rate assumptions used by management reflect the rates available on high-quality fixed income debt instruments as of December 31, the measurement date, of each year. A lower discount rate increases the present value of benefit obligations and net periodic postretirement benefit costs. As of December 31, 2008, Grainger decreased the discount rate used in the calculation of
its postretirement plan obligation from 6.5% to 5.9% to reflect the decrease in market interest rates. Grainger estimates that the decrease in the expected discount rate will decrease 2009 pretax earnings by approximately $2.5 million, although other changes in assumptions may increase, decrease or eliminate this effect.
Grainger considers the long-term historical actual return on plan assets and the historical performance of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index in developing its expected long-term return on plan assets. In 2008, Grainger maintained the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 6.0% (net of tax at 40%) based on the historical average of long-term rates of return.
19
A 1 percentage point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have had the following effects on December 31, 2008 results (in thousands of dollars):
1 Percentage Point
Increase
(Decrease)
Effect on total of service and interest cost
$
4,206
$
(3,293
)
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefitobligation
37,268
(29,601
)
Grainger may terminate or modify the postretirement plan at any time, subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. In the event the postretirement plan is terminated, all assets of the Group Benefit Trust inure to the benefit of the participants. The foregoing assumptions are based on the presumption that the postretirement plan will continue. Were the postretirement plan to terminate, different actuarial assumptions and other factors might be applicable.
Grainger has used its best judgment in making assumptions and estimates and believes such assumptions and estimates used are appropriate. Changes to the assumptions may be required in future years as a result of actual experience or new trends and, therefore, may affect Grainger’s retirement plan obligations and future expense.
For additional information concerning postretirement healthcare benefits, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Insurance Reserves.
Grainger retains a significant portion of the risk of certain losses related to workers’ compensation, general liability and property losses through the utilization of high deductibles and self-insured retentions. There are also certain other risk areas for which Grainger does not maintain insurance.
Grainger is responsible for establishing accounting policies on insurance reserves. Although it relies on outside parties to project future claims costs, it retains control over actuarial assumptions, including loss development factors and claim payment patterns. Grainger performs ongoing reviews of its insured and uninsured risks, which it uses to establish the appropriate reserve levels.
The use of assumptions in the analysis leads to fluctuations in required reserves over time. Any change in the required reserve balance is reflected in the current period’s results of operations.
Income Taxes.
Grainger recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The tax balances and income tax expense recognized by Grainger are based on management’s interpretations of the tax laws of multiple jurisdictions. Income tax expense reflects Grainger’s best estimates and assumptions regarding, among other items, the level of future taxable income, interpretation of tax laws and tax planning opportunities. Future rulings by tax authorities and future changes in tax laws and their interpretation, changes in projected levels of taxable income and future tax planning strategies could impact the actual effective tax rate and tax balances recorded by Grainger.
Other.
Other significant accounting policies, not involving the same level of measurement uncertainties as those discussed above, are nevertheless important to an understanding of the financial statements. Policies such as revenue recognition, depreciation, intangibles, long-lived assets and warranties require judgments on complex matters that are often subject to multiple external sources of authoritative guidance such as the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Possible changes in estimates or assumptions associated with these policies are not expected to have a material effect on the financial condition or results of operations of Grainger. More information on these additional accounting policies can be found in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
New Accounting Standards
The following new accounting standards exclude those pronouncements that are unlikely to have an effect on Grainger upon adoption.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations" (SFAS No. 141R). SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and will be applied to acquisitions after adoption by the Company.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51" (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent's ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No.160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the
20
parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company currently does not have any noncontrolling interest in consolidated financial statements, therefore does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a material effect on its results of operations or financial position.
In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (FSP 03-6-1). FSP 03-6-1 states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Upon adoption, a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data presentation to conform with the FSP 03-6-1 provisions. FSP 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
The Company’s unvested share-based payment awards, such as Performance Shares, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units (see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends meet the criteria of a participating security as defined by FSP 03-6-1. Accordingly, the adoption of FSP 03-6-1 will change the methodology of computing the Company’s earnings per share to the two-class method. This change will not affect previously reported consolidated net earnings or net cash flows from operations. Under the two-class method, earnings will be allocated between common stock and participating securities, resulting in lower earnings per share. Refer to the table below for further analysis of the impact adoption would have had on 2008 earnings per share.
2008 Quarter Ended
Mar. 31
June 30
Sept. 30
Dec. 31
Total
Earnings Per Share as previously reported
Basic
$
1.47
$
1.48
$
1.84
$
1.42
$
6.21
Diluted
$
1.43
$
1.43
$
1.79
$
1.39
$
6.04
Earnings Per Share Two-class method
Basic
$
1.44
$
1.44
$
1.80
$
1.39
$
6.07
Diluted
$
1.41
$
1.42
$
1.77
$
1.37
$
5.97
See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of new accounting standards.
Inflation and Changing Prices
Inflation during the last three years has not had a significant effect on operations. The predominant use of the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of accounting for inventories and accelerated depreciation methods for financial reporting and income tax purposes result in a substantial recognition of the effects of inflation in the financial statements.
The major impact of inflation is on buildings and improvements, where the gap between historic cost and replacement cost accumulates for these long-lived assets. The related depreciation expense associated with these assets would likely increase if adjustments were to be made for the cumulative effect of inflation.
Grainger believes the most positive means to combat inflation and advance the interests of investors lies in the continued application of basic business principles, which include improving productivity, maintaining working capital turnover and offering products and services which can command appropriate prices in the marketplace.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Form 10-K contains statements that are not historical in nature but concern future results and business plans, strategies and objectives and other matters that may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements” under the federal securities laws. Grainger has generally identified such forward-looking statements by using words such as “anticipate, anticipated, assumed, assumes, assumption, assumptions, believe, believes, contingency, continue, continued, continues, could, estimate, estimated, estimates, expect, expectation, expected, expects, forecasts, intended, intends, may, might, percent complete, planned, predict, predictable, predicted, presumption, project, projected, projecting, projection, projections, potential, reasonably likely, scheduled, should, unlikely, will, and would” or similar expressions.
Grainger cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized, although Grainger does believe that its assumptions underlying its forward-looking statements are reasonable. Achievement of future results is subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause Grainger’s results to differ materially from those which are presented.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those presented or implied in a forward-looking statement include, without limitation: higher product costs or other expenses; a major loss of customers; loss or disruption of source of supply; increased competitive pricing pressures; failure to develop or implement new technologies or business strategies; the outcome of pending and future litigation or governmental or regulatory proceedings; investigations, inquiries, audits and changes in laws and regulations; disruption of information technology or data security systems; general industry or market conditions; general global economic conditions; currency exchange rate fluctuations; market volatility; commodity price volatility; labor shortages; facilities disruptions or shutdowns; higher fuel costs or disruptions in transportation services; natural and other catastrophes; unanticipated weather conditions; and the factors identified in Item 1A, Risk Factors.
21
Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on Grainger’s forward-looking statements and Grainger undertakes no obligation to publicly update the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Item 7A: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Grainger is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk related to its transactions, assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. For 2008, a uniform 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies that affect Grainger and its joint ventures would have resulted in a $2.6 million decrease in net earnings. Comparatively, in 2007 a uniform 10% strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies that affect Grainger and its joint ventures would have resulted in a $2.1 million decrease in net earnings. A uniform 10% weakening of the U.S. dollar would have resulted in a $3.1 million increase in net earnings for 2008, as compared with an increase in net earnings of $2.6 million for 2007. This sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in potential changes in sales levels or local currency prices or costs. Grainger does not hold derivatives for trading purposes.
Grainger is also exposed to interest rate risk in its debt portfolio. During 2008 and 2007, all of its long-term debt was variable rate debt. A 1 percentage point increase in interest rates paid by Grainger would have resulted in a decrease to net earnings of approximately $2.5 million for 2008 and $0.3 million for 2007. A 1 percentage point decrease in interest rates would have resulted in an increase to net earnings of approximately $2.5 million for 2008 and $0.3 million for 2007. This sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in interest rates on long-term debt does not factor in potential changes in long-term debt levels.
Grainger has limited primary exposure to commodity price risk on certain products for resale, but does not purchase commodities directly.
Item 8: Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements and supplementary data are included on pages 27 to 64. See the Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data on page 26.
Item 9: Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A: Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Grainger carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of Grainger’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that Grainger’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
(A)
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management’s report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is included on page 27 of this Report under the heading Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
(B)
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm
The report from Ernst & Young LLP on its audit of the effectiveness of Grainger’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, is included on page 28 of this Report under the heading Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
(C)
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in Grainger’s internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Grainger’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B: Other Information
None.
22
PART III
Item 10: Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Grainger’s proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 29, 2009, under the captions “Election of Directors,” “Board of Directors and Board Committees” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.” Information required by this item regarding executive officers of Grainger is set forth in Part I of this report under the caption “Executive Officers.”
Grainger has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. This code of ethics is incorporated into Grainger’s business conduct guidelines for directors, officers and employees. Grainger intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K relating to its code of ethics by posting such information on its Web site at www.grainger.com/investor. A copy of the code of ethics incorporated into Grainger’s business conduct guidelines is also available in print without charge to any person upon request to Grainger’s Corporate Secretary. Grainger has also adopted Operating Principles for the Board of Directors, which are available on its Web site and are available in print to any person who requests them.
Item 11: Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Grainger’s proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 29, 2009, under the captions “Board of Directors and Board Committees,” “Director Compensation,” “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board” and “Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
Item 12: Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Grainger’s proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 29, 2009, under the captions “Ownership of Grainger Stock” and “Equity Compensation Plans.”
Item 13: Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Grainger’s proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 29, 2009, under the captions "Election of Directors" and "Transactions with Related Persons."
Item 14: Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated by reference to Grainger’s proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of shareholders to be held April 29, 2009, under the caption “Audit Fees and Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.”
PART IV
Item 15: Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
1.
Financial Statements. See Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
2.
Financial Statement Schedules. The schedules listed in Reg. 210.5-04 have been omitted because they are either not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
3.
Exhibits
(3)
(a)
Restated Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to Grainger’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998.
(b)
Bylaws, as amended March 31, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to Grainger's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
(4)
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures
(a)
Agreement dated as of April 28, 1999, between Grainger and Fleet National Bank (formerly Bank Boston, NA), as rights agent, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Grainger’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 28, 1999, and related letter concerning the appointment of EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. (now Computershare Trust Company, N.A.), as successor rights agent, effective August 1, 2002, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Grainger’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.
(b)
No instruments which define the rights of holders of Grainger’s Industrial Development Revenue Bonds are filed herewith, pursuant to the exemption contained in Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(4)(iii). Grainger hereby agrees to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of any such instrument.
(10)
Material Contracts
(a)
(i)
Accelerated share repurchase agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to Grainger's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007.
(ii)
A Credit Agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, and other lenders incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to Grainger's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
23
(b)
Compensatory Plans or Arrangements
(i)
Director Stock Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to Grainger’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
(ii)
Office of the Chairman Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Appendix B of Grainger’s Proxy Statement dated March 26, 1997.
(iii)
1990 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to Grainger’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
(iv)
2001 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to Grainger’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
(v)
Executive Death Benefit Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(v) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
(1) First amendment to the Executive Death Benefit Plan.
(vi)
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(e) to Grainger’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1989.
(vii)
1985 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d)(vii) to Grainger’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.
(viii)
Supplemental Profit Sharing Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(viii) to Grainger’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
(ix)
Supplemental Profit Sharing Plan II, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(ix) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
(x)
Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement between Grainger and certain of its executive officers, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(x) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
(xi)
Voluntary Salary and Incentive Deferral Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(xi) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
(xii)
Summary Description of Directors Compensation Program effective April 30, 2008, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to Grainger’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007.
(xiii)
Summary Description of Directors Compensation Program effective April 29, 2009.
(xiv)
2005 Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to Grainger's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
(xv)
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement between Grainger and certain of its executive officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(xiv) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
(xvi)
Form of Stock Option and Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between Grainger and certain of its executive officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(xv) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
(xvii)
Form of Performance Share Award Agreement between Grainger and certain of its executive officers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(xvi) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
(xviii)
Form of Performance Share Award Agreement (non-dividend equivalent) between Grainger and certain of its executive officers.
(xix)
Summary Description of 2007 Management Incentive Program, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(xvii) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
(xx)
Summary Description of 2008 Management Incentive Program, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(xviii) to Grainger's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
(xxi)
Summary Description of 2009 Management Incentive Program.
(21)
Subsidiaries of Grainger.
(23)
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
(31)
Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a) Certifications
(a)
Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b)
Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(32)
Section 1350 Certifications
(a)
Chief Executive Officer certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b)
Chief Financial Officer certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Grainger has duly issued this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DATE: February 26, 2009
W.W. GRAINGER, INC.
By:
/s/ James T. Ryan
James T. Ryan
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of Grainger on
February 26, 2009, in the capacities indicated.
/s/ James T. Ryan
/s/ William K. Hall
James T. Ryan
William K. Hall
President and Chief Executive Officer
Director
(Principal Executive Officer and Director)
/s/ Stuart L. Levenick
/s/ Ronald L. Jadin
Stuart L. Levenick
Ronald L. Jadin
Director
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
/s/ John W. McCarter, Jr.
(Principal Financial Officer)
John W. McCarter, Jr.
Director
/s/ Gregory S. Irving
Gregory S. Irving
/s/ Neil S. Novich
Vice President and Controller
Neil S. Novich
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Director
/s/ Richard L. Keyser
/s/ Michael J. Roberts
Richard L. Keyser
Michael J. Roberts
Chairman of the Board
Director
/s/ Brian P. Anderson
/s/ Gary L. Rogers
Brian P. Anderson
Gary L. Rogers
Director
Director
/s/ Wilbur H. Gantz
/s/ James D. Slavik
Wilbur H. Gantz
James D. Slavik
Director
Director
/s/ V. Ann Hailey
/s/ Harold B. Smith
V. Ann Hailey
Harold B. Smith
Director
Director
25
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
Page(s)
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
FINANCIAL REPORTING
27
REPORTS OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
28-29
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
30
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
31
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
32-33
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
34-35
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
36-37
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
38-63
EXHIBIT 23 – CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
64
26
MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of W.W. Grainger, Inc. (Grainger) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Grainger’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to Grainger’s management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements under all potential conditions. Therefore, effective internal control over financial reporting provides only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance with respect to the preparation and presentation of financial statements.
Grainger’s management assessed the effectiveness of Grainger’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.
Based on its assessment under that framework and the criteria established therein, Grainger’s management concluded that Grainger’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008.
Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited management’s effectiveness of Grainger’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, as stated in their report which is included herein.
27
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
We have audited W.W. Grainger, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). W.W. Grainger, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, W.W. Grainger, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of W.W. Grainger, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive earnings, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 of W.W. Grainger, Inc., and our report dated February 25, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 25, 2009
28
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of W.W. Grainger, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive earnings, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of W.W. Grainger, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As described in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the Company changed its method of accounting for uncertain tax positions to conform with FIN 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.”
As described in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for share-based payments to conform with FASB Statement No. 123(R).
As described in Note 14 to the consolidated financial statements, effective December 31, 2006, the Company changed its method of accounting for other postretirement plans to conform with FASB Statement No. 158.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), W.W. Grainger, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 25, 2009
29
W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Net sales
$
6,850,032
$
6,418,014
$
5,883,654
Cost of merchandise sold
4,041,810
3,814,391
3,529,504
Gross profit
2,808,222
2,603,623
2,354,150
Warehousing, marketing and
administrative expenses
2,025,550
1,932,970
1,776,079
Operating earnings
782,672
670,653
578,071
Other income and (expense)
Interest income
5,069
12,125
21,496
Interest expense
(14,485
)
(2,974
)
(1,926
)
Equity in net income of unconsolidated entities
3,642
2,016
2,960
Write-off of investment in unconsolidated entity
(6,031
)
–
–
Gain on sale of unconsolidated entity
–
–
2,291
Unclassified – net
2,351
41
131
Total other income and (expense)
(9,454
)
11,208
24,952
Earnings before income taxes
773,218
681,861
603,023
Income taxes
297,863
261,741
219,624
Net earnings
$
475,355
$
420,120
$
383,399
Earnings per share:
Basic
$
6.21
$
5.10
$
4.36
Diluted
$
6.04
$
4.94
$
4.24
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic
76,579,856
82,403,958
87,838,723
Diluted
78,750,328
85,044,963
90,523,774
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
30
W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
(In thousands of dollars)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2008
2006
Net earnings
$
475,355
$
420,120
$
383,399
Other comprehensive earnings (losses):
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of
tax benefit (expense) of $11,454, $(9,279) and $147, respectively
(79,287
)
53,545
(1,181
)
Defined postretirement benefit plan:
Prior service credit arising during period
–
9,433
–
Amortization of prior service credit
(1,215
)
(437
)
–
Amortization of transition asset
(143
)
(143
)
–
Net gain (loss) arising during period
(49,872
)
11,620
–
Amortization of net loss
1,312
2,094
–
Income tax benefit (expense)
19,368
(8,756
)
–
(30,550
)
13,811
–
Gain (loss) on other employment-related benefit plans, net of tax benefit (expense) of $544, $(878) and $(21), respectively
(859
)
1,384
33
(110,696
)
68,740
(1,148
)
Comprehensive earnings, net of tax
$
364,659
$
488,860
$
382,251
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
31
W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts)
As of December 31,
2008
2007
2006
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
$
396,290
$
113,437
$
348,471
Marketable securities at cost, which approximates market value
–
20,074
12,827
Accounts receivable (less allowances for doubtful accounts of $26,481, $25,830 and $18,801, respectively)
589,416
602,650
566,607
Inventories
1,009,932
946,327
827,254
Prepaid expenses and other assets
73,359
61,666
58,804
Deferred income taxes
52,556
56,663
48,123
Prepaid income taxes
22,556
–
–
Total current assets
2,144,109
1,800,817
1,862,086
PROPERTY, BUILDINGS AND EQUIPMENT
Land
192,916
178,321
167,218
Buildings, structures and improvements
1,048,440
977,837
890,380
Furniture, fixtures, machinery and equipment
890,507
848,118
769,506
2,131,863
2,004,276
1,827,104
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
1,201,552
1,125,931
1,034,169
Property, buildings and equipment – net
930,311
878,345
792,935
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
97,442
54,658
48,793
INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
20,830
14,759
8,492
GOODWILL
213,159
233,028
210,671
OTHER ASSETS AND INTANGIBLES – NET
109,566
112,421
123,111
TOTAL ASSETS
$
3,515,417
$
3,094,028
$
3,046,088
32
W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS – CONTINUED
(In thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts)
As of December 31,
2008
2007
2006
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Short-term debt
$
19,960
$
102,060
$
–
Current maturities of long-term debt
21,257
4,590
4,590
Trade accounts payable
290,802
297,929
334,820
Accrued compensation and benefits
162,380
182,275
140,141
Accrued contributions to employees’ profit sharing plans
146,922
126,483
113,014
Accrued expenses
118,633
102,607
106,681
Income taxes payable
1,780
10,459
7,077
Total current liabilities
761,734
826,403
706,323
LONG-TERM DEBT
(less current maturities)
488,228
4,895
4,895
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES AND TAX
UNCERTAINTIES
33,219
20,727
6,235
ACCRUED EMPLOYMENT-RELATED
BENEFITS COSTS
198,431
143,895
151,020
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Cumulative Preferred Stock –
$5 par value – 12,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued nor outstanding
–
–
–
Common Stock – $0.50 par value –
300,000,000 shares authorized;
issued, 109,659,219, 109,659,219 and
109,657,938 shares, respectively
54,830
54,830
54,829
Additional contributed capital
564,728
475,350
478,454
Retained earnings
3,670,726
3,316,875
3,007,606
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings
(38,525
)
72,171
3,431
Treasury stock, at cost –
34,878,190, 30,199,804 and
25,590,311 shares, respectively
(2,217,954
)
(1,821,118
)
(1,366,705
)
Total shareholders’ equity
2,033,805
2,098,108
2,177,615
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
$
3,515,417
$
3,094,028
$
3,046,088
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
33
W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands of dollars)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net earnings
$
475,355
$
420,120
$
383,399
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
12,924
15,436
6,057
Deferred income taxes and tax uncertainties
5,182
(18,632
)
9,858
Depreciation and amortization:
Property, buildings and equipment
112,443
106,839
100,975
Capitalized software and other intangibles
27,127
25,160
17,593
Stock-based compensation
45,945
35,551
33,741
Tax benefit of stock incentive plans
1,925
3,193
1,563
Net gains on sales of property, buildings and equipment
(9,232
)
(7,254
)
(11,035
)
Income from unconsolidated entities
(3,642
)
(2,016
)
(2,960
)
Gain on sale of unconsolidated entity
–
–
(2,291
)
Write-off of unconsolidated entity
6,031
–
–
Change in operating assets and liabilities –
net of business acquisitions:
(Increase) in accounts receivable
(5,592
)
(41,814
)
(53,056
)
(Increase) in inventories
(92,518
)
(97,234
)
(33,839
)
(Increase) in prepaid income taxes
(22,556
)
–
–
(Increase) in prepaid expenses
(11,073
)
(2,342
)
(3,918
)
Increase (decrease) in trade accounts payable
(6,960
)
(39,436
)
10,888
Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities
199
54,457
(2,558
)
Increase (decrease) in current income
taxes payable
(7,784
)
2,304
(17,395
)
Increase in accrued employment-related
benefits costs
3,216
17,705
2,634
Other – net
(924
)
(3,162
)
(2,903
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
530,066
468,875
436,753
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to property, buildings and equipment
(182,678
)
(188,867
)
(127,814
)
Proceeds from sales of property, buildings and equipment
13,620
12,084
17,314
Additions to capitalized software
(12,297
)
(8,556
)
(8,950
)
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
19,848
12,765
–
Purchase of marketable securities
–
(17,079
)
(13,187
)
Proceeds from sale of unconsolidated entity
–
–
27,843
Net cash paid for business acquisitions
(34,290
)
(4,698
)
(34,390
)
Investments in unconsolidated entities
(6,487
)
(2,138
)
(3,988
)
Other – net
(351
)
(468
)
3,426
Net cash used in investing activities
(202,635
)
(196,957
)
(139,746
)
34
W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – CONTINUED
(In thousands of dollars)
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase (decrease) in commercial paper
$
(95,947
)
$
95,947
$
–
Borrowings under line of credit
29,959
14,107
–
Payments against line of credit
(15,437
)
(7,751
)
–
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
500,000
–
–
Proceeds from stock options exercised
46,833
113,500
64,437
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
13,533
30,696
13,373
Purchase of treasury stock
(394,247
)
(647,293
)
(472,787
)
Cash dividends paid
(121,504
)
(113,093
)
(97,896
)
Net cash used in financing activities
(36,810
)
(513,887
)
(492,873
)
Exchange rate effect on cash and cash equivalents
(7,768
)
6,935
(557
)
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
282,853
(235,034
)
(196,423
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
113,437
348,471
544,894
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
396,290
$
113,437
$
348,471
Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash payments for interest (net of amounts capitalized)
$
14,508
$
4,409
$
1,413
Cash payments for income taxes
306,960
244,541
212,350
Noncash investing activities:
Fair value of noncash assets acquired in business acquisitions
$
41,068
$
5,039
$
38,430
Liabilities assumed in business acquisitions
(6,778
)
(341
)
(4,040
)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
35
W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts)
Common Stock
Additional Contributed Capital
Retained Earnings
Unearned Restricted Stock Compensation
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings (Losses)
Treasury Stock
Balance at January 1, 2006
$
54,834
$
451,578
$
2,722,103
$
(17,280
)
$
27,082
$
(949,341
)
Exercise of stock options
–
(3,984
)
–
–
–
68,421
Tax benefits on stock-based
compensation awards
–
14,936
–
–
–
–
Stock option expense
–
19,904
–
–
–
–
Cancellation of other stock-
based compensation awards
(5
)
5
–
–
–
–
Amortization of other stock-
based compensation awards
–
13,845
–
–
–
–
Vesting of restricted stock
–
–
–
–
–
(4,263
)
Settlement of other stock- based compensation awards
–
(1,003
)
–
–
–
592
Purchase of treasury stock
–
–
–
–
–
(482,114
)
Other comprehensive earnings
–
–
–
–
(1,148
)
–
Adjustment to initially apply
SFAS No. 158 to
postretirement benefit plans,
net
of tax benefit of $14,280
–
–
–
–
(22,503
)
–
Reclassification of unearned restricted stock compensation
–
(17,280
)
–
17,280
–
–
Change in interest – joint
venture
–
453
–
–
–
–
Net earnings
–
–
383,399
–
–
–
Cash dividends paid ($1.11
per share)
–
–
(97,896
)
–
–
–
Balance at December 31, 2006
$
54,829
$
478,454
$
3,007,606
$
–
$
3,431
$
(1,366,705
)
Adoption of FIN 48
–
–
870
–
–
–
Reinstatement of equity method
–
–
1,372
–
–
–
Exercise of stock options
–
(19,991
)
–
–
–
133,491
Tax benefits on stock-based
compensation awards
–
33,889
–
–
–
–
Stock option expense
–
16,888
–
–
–
–
Amortization of other stock-
based compensation awards
–
18,667
–
–
–
–
Vesting of restricted stock
–
–
–
–
–
(1,126
)
Settlement of other stock-based compensation awards
1
(2,557
)
–
–
–
1,189
Purchase of treasury stock
–
(50,000
)
–
–
–
(587,967
)
Other comprehensive earnings
–
–
–
–
68,740
–
Net earnings
–
–
420,120
–
–
–
Cash dividends paid ($1.34
per share)
–
–
(113,093
)
–
–
–
Balance at December 31, 2007
$
54,830
$
475,350
$
3,316,875
$
–
$
72,171
$
(1,821,118
)
36
W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY – CONTINUED
(In thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts)
Common Stock
Additional Contributed Capital
Retained Earnings
Unearned Restricted Stock Compensation
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Earnings (Losses)
Treasury Stock
Balance at December 31, 2007
$
54,830
$
475,350
$
3,316,875
$
–
$
72,171
$
(1,821,118
)
Exercise of stock options
–
(12,663
)
–
–
–
59,460
Tax benefits on stock-based
compensation awards
–
15,458
–
–
–
–
Stock option expense
–
19,868
–
–
–
–
Amortization of other stock-
based compensation awards
–
26,077
–
–
–
–
Vesting of restricted stock
–
–
–
–
–
(417
)
Settlement of other stock-based compensation awards
–
(9,362
)
–
–
–
5,209
Purchase of treasury stock
–
50,000
–
–
–
(461,088
)
Other comprehensive earnings
–
–
–
–
(110,696
)
–
Net earnings
–
–
475,355
–
–
–
Cash dividends paid ($1.55
per share)
–
–
(121,504
)
–
–
–
Balance at December 31, 2008
$
54,830
$
564,728
$
3,670,726
$
–
$
(38,525
)
$
(2,217,954
)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
37
W.W. Grainger, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
NOTE 1 – BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
INDUSTRY INFORMATION
W.W. Grainger, Inc. is the leading broad-line supplier of facilities maintenance and other related products in North America, with operations primarily in the United States, Canada and Mexico. In this report, the words “Company” or “Grainger” mean W.W. Grainger, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions are eliminated from the consolidated financial statements.
INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
For investments in which the Company owns or controls from 20% to 50% of the voting shares, the equity method of accounting is used. Changes in interest arising from the issuance of stock by an investee is accounted for as additional contributed capital. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
MANAGEMENT ESTIMATES
In preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent liabilities, and revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The financial statements of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local currency as the functional currency. Net exchange gains or losses resulting from the translation of financial statements of foreign operations and related long-term debt are recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive earnings. See Notes 2 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenues recognized include product sales, billings for freight and handling charges and fees earned for services provided. The Company recognizes product sales and billings for freight and handling charges primarily on the date products are shipped to, or picked up by, the customer. The Company’s standard shipping terms are FOB shipping point. On occasion, the Company will negotiate FOB destination terms. These sales are recognized upon delivery to the customer. Fee revenues, which account for less than 1% of total revenues, are recognized after services are completed.
COST OF MERCHANDISE SOLD
Cost of merchandise sold includes product and product-related costs, vendor consideration, freight-out costs and handling costs. The Company defines handling costs as those costs incurred to fulfill a shipped sales order.
VENDOR CONSIDERATION
The Company receives rebates from its vendors to promote their products. The Company utilizes numerous advertising programs to promote its vendors’ products, including catalogs and other printed media, Internet and other marketing programs. Most of these programs relate to multiple vendors, which makes supporting the specific, identifiable and incremental criteria difficult, and would require numerous assumptions and judgments. Based on the inexact nature of trying to track reimbursements to the exact advertising expenditure for each vendor, the Company treats most vendor advertising allowances as a reduction of cost of merchandise sold rather than a reduction of operating (advertising) expenses. Rebates earned from vendors that are based on product purchases are capitalized into inventory as part of product purchase price. These rebates are credited to cost of merchandise sold based on sales. Vendor rebates that are earned based on products sold are credited directly to cost of merchandise sold.
ADVERTISING
Advertising costs are expensed in the year the related advertisement is first presented. Advertising expense was $120.7 million, $122.4 million and $115.4 million for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Most vendor-provided allowances are classified as an offset to cost of merchandise sold. For additional information see VENDOR CONSIDERATION above.
For interim reporting purposes, advertising expense is amortized equally over each period, based on estimated expenses for the full year. Advertising costs for media that have not been distributed by year-end are capitalized as Prepaid expenses. Amounts included in Prepaid expenses at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $39.5 million, $32.1 million and $30.2 million, respectively.
38
WAREHOUSING, MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Included in this category are purchasing, branch operations, information services, and marketing and selling expenses, as well as other types of general and administrative costs.
STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
The Company measures all share-based payments using fair-value-based methods and records compensation expense related to these payments in the consolidated financial statements. The Company values stock option compensation using a binomial lattice option-pricing model. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
INCOME TAXES
Income taxes are recognized during the year in which transactions enter into the determination of financial statement income, with deferred taxes being provided for temporary differences between financial and tax reporting.
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS (LOSSES)
The Company’s Other comprehensive earnings (losses) include foreign currency translation adjustments and unrecognized gains (losses) on postretirement and other employment-related benefit plans. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
CASH AND MARKETABLE SECURITIES
The Company considers investments in highly liquid debt instruments, purchased with an original maturity of ninety days or less, to be cash equivalents. For cash equivalents, the carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these instruments.
The Company’s investments in marketable securities consist of commercial paper to be held to maturity. These investments have an original maturity date of more than 90 days. The investments are issued from high credit quality issuers. The marketable securities are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
The Company places temporary cash investments with institutions of high credit quality and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one institution.
The Company has a broad customer base representing many diverse industries doing business in all regions of the United States, Canada, Mexico, Panama, and China. Consequently, no significant concentration of credit risk is considered to exist.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The Company establishes reserves for customer accounts that are potentially uncollectible. The method used to estimate the allowances is based on several factors, including the age of the receivables and the historical ratio of actual write-offs to the age of the receivables. These analyses also take into consideration economic conditions that may have an impact on a specific industry, group of customers or a specific customer.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined primarily by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, which accounts for approximately 77% of total inventory. For the remaining inventory, cost is determined by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
PROPERTY, BUILDINGS AND EQUIPMENT
Property, buildings and equipment are valued at cost. For financial statement purposes, depreciation and amortization are provided in amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives, principally on the declining-balance and sum-of-the-years-digits methods. The principal estimated useful lives for determining depreciation are as follows:
Buildings, structures and improvements
10 to 45 years
Furniture, fixtures, machinery and equipment
3 to 10 years
Improvements to leased property are amortized over the initial terms of the respective leases or the estimated service lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter.
The Company capitalized interest costs of $1.3 million, $1.4 million and $0.3 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The carrying value of long-lived assets is evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized when estimated undiscounted future cash flows resulting from use of the asset, including disposition, is less than the carrying value of the asset. Impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value.
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
Goodwill is recognized as the excess cost of an acquired entity over the net amount assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill is not amortized, but rather tested for impairment on an annual basis and more often if circumstances require. Impairment losses are recognized whenever the implied fair value of goodwill is less than its carrying value.
39
The Company recognizes an acquired intangible apart from goodwill whenever the intangible arises from contractual or other legal rights, or whenever it can be separated or divided from the acquired entity and sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, either individually or in combination with a related contract, asset or liability. Such intangibles are amortized over their estimated useful lives unless the estimated useful life is determined to be indefinite. Amortizable intangible assets are being amortized over useful lives of three to 17 years. Impairment losses are recognized if the carrying amount of an intangible, subject to amortization, is not recoverable from expected future cash flows and its carrying amount exceeds its fair value.
The Company also maintains intangible assets with indefinite lives, which are not amortized. These intangibles are tested for impairment on an annual basis and more often if circumstances require, similar to the treatment for goodwill. Impairment losses are recognized whenever the implied fair value of these assets is less than their carrying value.
INSURANCE RESERVES
The Company purchases insurance for catastrophic exposures and those risks required to be insured by law. It also retains a significant portion of the risk of certain losses related to workers’ compensation, general liability and property losses through the utilization of high deductibles and self-insured retentions. Reserves for these potential losses are based on an external analysis of the Company’s historical claims results and other actuarial assumptions.
WARRANTY RESERVES
The Company generally warrants the products it sells against defects for one year. For a significant portion of warranty claims, the manufacturer of the product is responsible for expenses. For warranty expenses not covered by the manufacturer, the Company provides a reserve for future costs based primarily on historical experience. The reserve activity was as follows (in thousands of dollars):
As of December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Beginning balance
$
3,442
$
4,651
$
3,763
Returns
(12,917
)
(12,781
)
(9,579
)
Provisions
12,693
11,572
10,467
Ending balance
$
3,218
$
3,442
$
4,651
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations" (SFAS No. 141R). SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141R also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and will be applied to acquisitions after adoption by the Company.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51" (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent's ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No.160 also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company currently does not have any noncontrolling interest in consolidated financial statements, therefore does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 160 to have a material effect on its results of operations or financial position.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133” (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements related to derivative instruments and hedging activities which will enable investors to better understand the effects on an entity’s financial statements, financial position and cash flows. The statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 161 to have a material effect on its results of operations or financial position.
In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position FSP 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (FSP 142-3). FSP 142-3 amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” FSP 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of FSP 142-3 to have a material effect on its results of operations or financial position.
In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 is intended to improve financial reporting by
40
identifying a consistent framework, or hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The FASB believes that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 162 to have a material effect on its results of operations or financial position.
In June 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (FSP 03-6-1). FSP 03-6-1 states that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. Upon adoption, a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data presentation to conform with the FSP 03-6-1 provisions. FSP 03-6-1 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
The Company’s unvested share-based payment awards, such as Performance Shares, Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units (see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends meet the criteria of a participating security as defined by FSP 03-6-1. Accordingly, the adoption of FSP 03-6-1 will change the methodology of computing the Company’s earnings per share to the two-class method. This change will not affect previously reported consolidated net earnings or net cash flows from operations. Under the two-class method, earnings will be allocated between common stock and participating securities, resulting in lower earnings per share. Refer to the table below for further analysis of the impact adoption would have had on 2008 earnings per share.
2008 Quarter Ended
Mar. 31
June 30
Sept. 30
Dec. 31
Total
Earnings Per Share as previously reported
Basic
$
1.47
$
1.48
$
1.84
$
1.42
$
6.21
Diluted
$
1.43
$
1.43
$
1.79
$
1.39
$
6.04
Earnings Per Share Two-class method
Basic
$
1.44
$
1.44
$
1.80
$
1.39
$
6.07
Diluted
$
1.41
$
1.42
$
1.77
$
1.37
$
5.97
In November 2008, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 08-7, “Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets” (Issue 08-7). The FASB Statement No. 141(R), “Business Combinations,” and FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” require that assets acquired in a business combination be measured at fair value using market participant (not entity specific) assumptions. The measurement requirement includes intangible assets that the acquirer does not intend to use in the same manner as a market participant, such as those it intends to hold for defensive purposes (intangible assets that the acquirer does not intend to actively use). Defensive intangible assets generally were allocated little or no value in business combinations or asset acquisitions completed prior to the effective date of Statement No. 157. Issue 08-7 concluded that intangible assets that an acquirer intends to use as defensive assets are a separate unit of account from existing intangible assets of the acquirer. Also, Issue 08-7 concluded that a defensive intangible asset should be amortized over the period that the defensive intangible asset directly or indirectly contributes to the future cash flows of the entity. Issue 08-7 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of EITF 08-7 to have a material effect on its results of operations or financial position.
In November 2008, the EITF reached a consensus with respect to EITF Issue No. 08-6, “Accounting for Equity Method Investments” (Issue 08-6). Under Issue 08-6, the initial carrying value of an equity method investment should be based on the cost accumulation model. The equity method investment as a whole should be assessed for other-than-temporary impairment in accordance with APB 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.” However, the individual indefinite-lived intangible assets underlying the equity method investment should not be individually assessed for impairment at the investor level. An equity method investor should account for an investee’s issuance of shares as if the investor sold a portion of its investment with any resulting gain or loss reflected in the income statement. No changes were made to how an equity method investor should account for a change from the equity method to the cost method. Issue 08-6 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is not permitted. The Company does not expect adoption of Issue 08-6 to have a material effect on its results of operations or financial position.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, "Employer’s Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets." This FSP amends FASB Statement No. 132 (Revised 2003), "Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits," to provide guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The disclosures about plan assets required by this FSP shall be provided for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. Earlier application of the provisions of this FSP is permitted. The Company does not expect adoption of FSP FAS 132(R)-1 to have a material effect on its results of operations or financial position.
41
NOTE 3 – BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS
On July 21, 2008, the Company acquired a 49.9% interest in Asia Pacific Brands India Ltd. (Asia Pacific Brands) from its sole shareholder. Asia Pacific Brands, one of India's largest industrial and electrical wholesale distributors, is headquartered in Mumbai, India. With 27 locations and more than 6,200 dealer relationships across India, Asia Pacific Brands had revenue of US$47 million for its fiscal year ended March 31, 2008. The Company paid $5.4 million for its ownership interest. In addition, the Company and its joint venture partner each made a $1.1 million capital infusion that was intended to help grow the business. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company wrote-off its investment in this joint venture due to the economic slowdown in India and the loss of a major supplier which accounted for approximately 25% of the joint venture’s annual revenue. These conditions severely affect Asia Pacific Brand’s ability to secure additional financing to meet its current obligations and continue as a going concern. Until the investment was written-off, the Company used the equity method to account for this investment. See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
On July 10, 2008, Lab Safety Supply, Inc. (Lab Safety), the direct marketing subsidiary of the Company, acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Highsmith Inc. (Highsmith). Highsmith is a direct marketing leader in the library equipment, furniture and supplies market and had sales of $64 million in 2007. The purchase price and costs of the acquisition were $27.5 million in cash and $6.1 million in assumed liabilities. The estimated goodwill recognized in the transaction amounted to $2.4 million and is deductible for tax purposes. The integration of Highsmith into operations was completed in 2008. As part of the integration, Lab Safety discontinued the contract sales group of Highsmith, which represented approximately $19 million of sales in 2007.
On June 6, 2008, Acklands - Grainger Inc. acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Excel F.I.G. Inc. (Excel). Excel is a business-to-business broad-line distributor of maintenance, repair and operating supplies. In 2007, Excel had sales of approximately US$12 million. The purchase price and costs of the acquisition were US$6.8 million in cash and US$0.7 million in assumed liabilities. The goodwill recognized in the transaction amounted to US$4.4 million and is partially deductible for tax purposes.
On May 31, 2007, Lab Safety acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of McFeely’s Square Drive Screws (McFeely’s). McFeely’s is a direct marketer of specialty fasteners, hardware and tools for the professional woodworking industry. McFeely’s had more than $9 million in sales in 2006. The purchase price and costs of acquisition were $4.7 million in cash and $0.3 million in assumed liabilities. The goodwill recognized in the transaction amounted to $1.2 million and is fully deductible for tax purposes.
On November 17, 2006, Lab Safety acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Professional Inspection Equipment, Inc. and Construction Book Express, Inc. The companies are direct marketers of tools, instruments and reference materials to the building and home inspection markets. The companies had annual sales in 2005 of more than $18 million. The aggregate purchase price for the two companies was $20.9 million in cash and $1.7 million in assumed liabilities. The goodwill recognized in the transaction amounted to $18.7 million and is fully deductible for tax purposes.
On January 31, 2006, Lab Safety acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of Rand Materials Handling Equipment Co. (Rand). Rand is a national catalog distributor of warehouse, storage and packaging supplies. Rand had more than $16 million in sales in 2005. The aggregate purchase price for Rand was $13.9 million in cash and $2.3 million in assumed liabilities. The goodwill recognized in the transaction amounted to $9.9 million and is fully deductible for tax purposes.
The results of these acquisitions are included in the Company’s consolidated results from the respective dates of acquisition. Due to the immaterial nature of these transactions, disclosures of amounts assigned to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities and pro forma results of operations were not considered necessary.
NOTE 4 – ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The following table shows the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Balance at beginning of period
$
25,830
$
18,801
$
18,401
Provision for uncollectible accounts
12,924
15,436
6,057
Write-off of uncollectible accounts, less
recoveries
(11,501
)
(8,755
)
(5,660
)
Foreign currency or translation impact
(772
)
348
3
Balance at end of period
$
26,481
$
25,830
$
18,801
NOTE 5 – INVENTORIES
Inventories primarily consist of merchandise purchased for resale.
Inventories would have been $317.0 million, $287.7 million and $270.0 million higher than reported at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, if the FIFO method of inventory accounting had been used for all Company
42
inventories. Net earnings would have increased by $18.1 million, $10.8 million and $14.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, using the FIFO method of accounting. Inventory values using the FIFO method of accounting approximate replacement cost.
NOTE 6 – INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
The table below summarizes the activity in the investments in unconsolidated entities (in thousands of dollars):
Asia Pacific
MonotaRO
MRO Korea
Brands
USI-AGI
Co., Ltd.
Co., Ltd.
India Ltd.
Prairies Inc.
Total
Balance at January 1, 2006
$
2,434
$
–
$
–
$
22,721
$
25,155
Cash investments
3,988
–
–
–
3,988
Equity earnings
1,826
–
–
1,134
2,960
Divestiture
–
–
–
(24,967
)
(24,967
)
Change in interest due to
issuance of stock by
joint venture
453
–
–
–
453
Foreign currency gain (loss)
(209
)
–
–
1,112
903
Balance at December 31, 2006
8,492
–
–
–
8,492
Cash investments
–
2,138
–
–
2,138
Equity earnings
1,401
615
–
–
2,016
Reinstatement to equity
method of accounting
–
1,372
–
–
1,372
Foreign currency gain
620
121
–
–
741
Balance at December 31, 2007
$
10,513
$
4,246
–
$
–
$
14,759
Cash investments
–
–
6,487
–
6,487
Equity earnings (losses)
4,303
(205
)
(456
)
–
3,642
Write-off
–
–
(6,031
)
–
(6,031
)
Foreign currency gain (loss)
3,008
(1,035
)
–
–
1,973
Balance at December 31, 2008
$
17,824
$
3,006
–
$
–
$
20,830
Ownership interest at December 31, 2008
38.3
%
49.0
%
49.9
%
0.0
%
On July 21, 2008, the Company acquired a 49.9% interest in Asia Pacific Brands India Ltd. (Asia Pacific Brands) from its sole shareholder for $5.4 million. In addition, the Company and the joint venture partner each made a $1.1 million capital infusion intended to help grow the business. In the fourth quarter 2008, the Company wrote-off its investment due to the economic slowdown in India and the loss of a major supplier which accounted for approximately 25% of the joint venture’s annual revenue. These conditions severely affect Asia Pacific Brand’s ability to secure additional financing to meet its current obligations and continue as a going concern. The Company accounted for this investment using the equity method until it was written-off.
In 2003, the Company wrote-off its investment in MRO Korea Co., Ltd. and suspended the equity method of accounting even though the business was marginally profitable and self-funding. At that time, the market value of the business was limited because the business had only one significant customer (the other party in the joint venture) and the prospects for growth were dependent upon securing sufficient capital funding. In 2007, the Company and the other business partner in the joint venture agreed to significantly change the business model and fund the expansion of this business. The Company contributed $2.1 million to MRO Korea Co., Ltd., maintaining its 49% ownership, and resumed the equity method of accounting. In conjunction with the reinstatement of the equity accounting method, a credit was recorded to retained earnings for $1.4 million, which represented the accumulated unrecognized equity earnings during the period the equity method was suspended and the write-down recognized in 2003.
In the first quarter of 2006, the Company contributed $4.0 million to MonotaRO Co., Ltd., its 38.3% owned company in Japan. In the fourth quarter of 2006, an initial public offering by this company resulted in a change of interest of $0.5 million, recorded as additional contributed capital. The market value of this investment, based on the closing stock price on January 28, 2009, was $50.7 million.
On February 23, 2006, Acklands
–
Grainger Inc. (Acklands – Grainger), the Company’s Canadian subsidiary, received a Notice of Purchase advising Acklands – Grainger that Uni-Select Inc., a Canadian company, was exercising its contractual option to purchase all of Acklands – Grainger’s shares in the USI-AGI Prairies Inc. joint venture. The transaction closed on May 31, 2006, for Canadian $30.9 million (US$27.8 million), resulting in a US$2.3 million pre-tax gain for the Company. The Company’s 50% ownership investment in this joint venture was previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The carrying value of this investment included US$5.1 million of allocated goodwill. The joint venture was managed by Uni-Select Inc.
43
NOTE 7 – CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE
Amortization of capitalized software is on a straight-line basis over three and five years. Amortization begins when the software is available for its intended use. Amortization expense was $22.7 million, $21.0 million and $13.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Company reviews the amounts capitalized for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable.
NOTE 8 – SHORT-TERM DEBT
The following summarizes information concerning short-term debt (in thousands of dollars):
As of December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Line of Credit
Outstanding at December 31
$
19,960
$
6,113
$
–
Maximum month-end balance during the year
$
19,960
$
11,234
$
–
Average amount outstanding during the year
$
13,022
$
7,756
$
–
Weighted average interest rate during the year
6.23
%
6.48
%
–
%
Weighted average interest rate at December 31
4.86
%
6.57
%
–
%
Commercial Paper
Outstanding at December 31
$
–
$
95,947
$
–
Maximum month-end balance during the year
$
319,860
$
139,104
$
–
Average amount outstanding during the year
$
54,589
$
28,030
$
–
Weighted average interest rate during the year
3.08
%
5.38
%
–
%
Weighted average interest rate at December 31
–
4.30
%
–
%
The Company had $29.2 million, $31.1 million and $8.6 million of uncommitted lines of credit denominated in foreign currencies at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. At December 31, 2008, there was $20.0 million outstanding under these lines of credit relating to Grainger China LLC. Grainger China LLC utilizes a line of credit to meet its business growth and operating needs.
Commercial paper was used to fund periodic working capital requirements and the accelerated share repurchase program. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion of the Company’s share repurchase program. A portion of the proceeds from the $500 million term loan were used to refinance $311 million in outstanding commercial paper in May of 2008. Refer to Note 9 for further discussion on the use of proceeds from the term loan.
For 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company had a committed line of credit totaling $250.0 million for which the Company pays a commitment fee of 0.04% for each year. There were no borrowings under the committed line of credit.
The Company had $18.8 million of letters of credit at December 31, 2008, and $15.8 million of letters of credit at December 31, 2007 and 2006, primarily related to the Company’s casualty insurance program. The Company also had $6.0 million, $3.2 million and $3.3 million at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, in letters of credit to facilitate the purchase of product from foreign sources.
NOTE 9 – LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
As of December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Bank term loan
$
500,000
$
–
$
–
Industrial development revenue and private
activity bonds
9,485
9,485
9,485
Less current maturities
(21,257
)
(4,590
)
(4,590
)
$
488,228
$
4,895
$
4,895
On May 6, 2008, the Company entered into a $500 million, unsecured four-year bank term loan. Proceeds were used to pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes. The weighted average interest rate paid on the term loan during 2008 was 3.33%. The Company at its option may prepay the term loan in whole or in part.
The industrial development revenue and private activity bonds include various issues that bear interest at variable rates capped at 15%, and come due in various amounts from 2009 through 2021. The weighted average interest rate paid on the bonds during the year was 2.47%. Interest rates on some of the issues are subject to change at certain dates in the future. The bondholders may require the Company to redeem certain bonds concurrent with a change in interest rates and certain other bonds annually. In addition, $4.6 million of these bonds had an unsecured liquidity facility
44
available at December 31, 2008, for which the Company compensated a bank through a commitment fee of 0.07%. There were no borrowings related to this facility at December 31, 2008. The Company classified $4.6 million of bonds currently subject to redemption options in current maturities of long-term debt at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
The scheduled aggregate principal payments are due as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Year
Payment Amount
2009
$
18,900
2010
$
50,700
2011
$
50,900
2012
$
387,500
2013 and after
$
1,500
The Company’s debt instruments include only standard affirmative and negative covenants that are normal in debt instruments of similar amounts and structure. The Company’s debt instruments do not contain financial or performance covenants restrictive to the business of the Company, reflecting its strong financial position. The Company is in compliance with all debt covenants for the year ended December 31, 2008.
NOTE 10 – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Retirement Plans
A majority of the Company’s employees are covered by a noncontributory profit sharing plan. This plan provides for annual employer contributions generally based upon a formula related primarily to earnings before federal income taxes, limited to a percentage of the total eligible compensation paid to all eligible employees. The plan was amended on July 30, 2008, to establish a minimum contribution of 8% and a maximum contribution of 18% of total eligible compensation paid to all eligible employees. This change was retroactive to January 1, 2008. Previously, there was no minimum percentage and the maximum percentage was 25%. The Company also sponsors additional defined contribution plans, which cover most of the other employees. Provisions under all plans were $145.4 million, $130.2 million and $114.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Postretirement Benefits
The Company has a postretirement healthcare benefits plan that provides coverage for a majority of its employees and their dependents should they elect to maintain such coverage upon retirement. Covered employees become eligible for participation when they qualify for retirement while working for the Company. Participation in the plan is voluntary and requires participants to make contributions toward the cost of the plan, as determined by the Company.
The Company’s accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) and net periodic benefit costs include the effect of the federal subsidy provided by the “Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003” (the Medicare Act). The Medicare Act provides a federal subsidy to retiree healthcare benefit plan sponsors that provide a prescription drug benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to that provided by Medicare. As a result of the subsidy, the APBO has been reduced by $45.4 million, $40.4 million and $33.4 million as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The subsidy has reduced net periodic benefits costs by approximately $5.2 million, $6.4 million and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The net periodic benefits costs charged to operating expenses, which were valued with a measurement date of January 1 for each year, consisted of the following components (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Service cost
$
9,699
$
10,856
$
9,737
Interest cost
9,490
8,973
7,599
Expected return on assets
(4,466
)
(4,049
)
(2,790
)
Amortization of prior service credit
(1,215
)
(437
)
(858
)
Amortization of transition asset
(143
)
(143
)
(143
)
Amortization of unrecognized losses
1,312
2,094
2,903
Net periodic benefits costs
$
14,677
$
17,294
$
16,448
The Company has elected to amortize the amount of net unrecognized losses over a period equal to the average remaining service period for active plan participants expected to retire and receive benefits, or approximately 16.9 years for 2008.
45
Reconciliations of the beginning and ending balances of the APBO, which is calculated using a December 31 measurement date, the fair value of assets and the funded status of the benefit obligation follow (in thousands of dollars):
2008
2007
2006
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
$
150,910
$
155,353
$
127,598
Service cost
9,699
10,856
9,737
Interest cost
9,490
8,973
7,599
Plan participants’ contributions
1,751
1,575
1,670
Amendments
–
(9,433
)
5,559
Actuarial (gain) loss
21,443
(12,754
)
7,359
Benefits paid
(4,924
)
(3,929
)
(4,277
)
Medicare Part D Subsidy received
270
269
108
Benefit obligation at end of year
188,639
150,910
155,353
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
74,432
67,486
46,503
Actual returns on plan assets
(23,963
)
2,915
6,192
Employer contributions
9,407
6,385
17,398
Plan participants’ contributions
1,751
1,575
1,670
Benefits paid
(4,924
)
(3,929
)
(4,277
)
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
56,703
74,432
67,486
Accrued postretirement benefit costs
$
131,936
$
76,478
$
87,867
The amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive earnings consisted of the following components (in thousands of dollars):
As of December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Prior service credit
$
9,377
$
10,592
$
1,596
Transition asset
857
1,000
1,143
Unrecognized losses
(73,966
)
(25,405
)
(39,119
)
Deferred tax asset
24,800
5,432
14,188
Net losses
$
(38,932
)
$
(8,381
)
$
(22,192
)
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (AOCE) related to the postretirement benefit costs that will be amortized into net periodic postretirement benefit cost in 2009 are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
2009
Amortization of prior service credit
$
(1,215
)
Amortization of transition asset
(143
)
Amortization of
unrecognized losses
4,377
Estimated amount to be amortized from AOCE into
net periodic postretirement benefit costs
$
3,019
The benefit obligation was determined by applying the terms of the plan and actuarial models. These models include various actuarial assumptions, including discount rates, assumed rates of return on plan assets and healthcare cost trend rates. The actuarial assumptions also anticipate future cost-sharing changes to retiree contributions that will maintain the current cost-sharing ratio between the Company and the retirees. The Company evaluates its actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and considers changes in these long-term factors based upon market conditions and historical experience.
The plan amendment effective January 1, 2008 (reflected in the 2007 valuation above), changed the out-of-pocket maximums, co-payments and coinsurance amounts for retirees. The plan amendment effective January 1, 2007 (reflected in the 2006 valuation above), changed the retiree contribution percentages for certain age groups.
46
The following assumptions were used to determine net periodic benefit cost at January 1:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Discount rate
6.50
%
5.90
%
5.50
%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets,
net of tax at 40%
6.00
%
6.00
%
6.00
%
Initial healthcare cost trend rate
10.00
%
10.00
%
10.00
%
Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate
5.00
%
5.00
%
5.00
%
Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate reached
2018
2017
2016
The following assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations at December 31:
2008
2007
2006
Discount rate
5.90
%
6.50
%
5.90
%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets,
net of tax at 40%
6.00
%
6.00
%
6.00
%
Initial healthcare cost trend rate
10.00
%
10.00
%
10.00
%
Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate
5.00
%
5.00
%
5.00
%
Year ultimate healthcare cost trend rate reached
2019
2018
2017
The discount rate assumptions reflect the rates available on high-quality fixed income debt instruments. These rates have been selected due to their similarity to the projected cash flows of the postretirement healthcare benefit plan.
The Company reviews external data and its own historical trends for healthcare costs to determine the healthcare cost trend rates. Assumed healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the healthcare plans. A 1 percentage point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following effects on December 31, 2008 results (in thousands of dollars):
1 Percentage Point
Increase
(Decrease)
Effect on total service and interest cost
$
4,206
$
(3,293
)
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
37,268
(29,601
)
The Company has established a Group Benefit Trust to fund the plan and process benefit payments. The assets of the trust are invested entirely in funds designed to track the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (S&P 500). This investment strategy reflects the long-term nature of the plan obligation and seeks to take advantage of the superior earnings potential of equity securities. The Company uses the long-term historical return on the plan assets and the historical performance of the S&P 500 to develop its expected return on plan assets. The required use of an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets may result in recognizing income that is greater or less than the actual return on plan assets in any given year. Over time, however, the expected long-term returns are designed to approximate the actual long-term returns and, therefore, result in a pattern of income recognition that more closely matches the pattern of the services provided by the employees.
The funding of the trust is an estimated amount which is intended to allow the maximum deductible contribution under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (IRC), as amended, and was $9.4 million, $6.4 million and $17.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. There are no minimum funding requirements and the Company intends to follow its practice of funding the maximum deductible contribution under the IRC.
The Company forecasts the following benefit payments (which include a projection for expected future employee service) and subsidy receipts (in thousands of dollars):
Estimated gross benefit payments
Estimated Medicare subsidy receipts
2009
$
3,852
$
(414
)
2010
4,436
(497
)
2011
5,173
(587
)
2012
5,989
(694
)
2013
7,017
(809
)
2014 – 2018
56,046
(6,507
)
47
Executive Death Benefit Plan
The Executive Death Benefit Plan provides one of three potential benefits: a supplemental income benefit (SIB), an executive death benefit (EDB) or a postretirement payment. The SIB provides income continuation at 50% of total compensation, payable for ten years to the beneficiary of a participant if that participant dies while employed by the Company. Alternatively, the EDB provides an after-tax lump sum payment of one times final total compensation to the beneficiary of a participant who dies after retirement. In addition, a participant may elect to receive a reduced postretirement payment instead of the EDB. Effective October 29, 2008, new participants to the plan will not be eligible for the reduced postretirement payment option. Plan participation is determined by a committee of management. There are no plan assets. Benefits are paid as they come due from the general assets of the Company.
The net periodic benefits costs charged to operating expenses, which were valued with a measurement date of January 1 for each year, consisted of the following components (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Service cost
$
247
$
298
$
361
Interest cost
880
883
850
Amortization of unrecognized (gains) losses
(153
)
127
154
Net periodic benefits costs
$
974
$
1,308
$
1,365
Reconciliations of the beginning and ending balances of the projected benefit obligation, which are calculated using a December 31 measurement date follow (in thousands of dollars):
2008
2007
2006
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
$
14,115
$
14,906
$
15,222
Service cost
247
298
361
Interest cost
880
883
850
Actuarial (gains) losses
1,425
(1,972
)
(1,095
)
Benefits paid
(579
)
–
(432
)
Benefit obligation at end of year
$
16,088
$
14,115
$
14,906
As there are no plan assets, the benefits were paid from the general assets of the Company.
The amounts recognized as the current and long-term portions of the benefit obligation follow (in thousands of dollars):
As of December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Current liabilities
$
552
$
739
$
454
Noncurrent liabilities
15,536
13,376
14,452
Net amounts recognized
$
16,088
$
14,115
$
14,906
Net gains and losses recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive earnings were gains of $0.3 million and $1.9 million and losses of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The net gain that will be amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive earnings into net periodic benefit cost in 2009 is $24.5 thousand.
The benefit obligation was determined by applying the terms of the plan and actuarial models. These models include various actuarial assumptions, including discount rates, mortality and salary progression. The Company evaluates its actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and considers changes in these long-term factors based upon market conditions and historical experience.
The following assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations at December 31:
2008
2007
2006
Discount rate used to determine net periodic benefit cost
(January 1 valuation)
6.40
%
5.90
%
5.50
%
Discount rate used to determine benefit obligation
(
December 31 valuation)
6.10
%
6.40
%
5.90
%
Compensation increase used to determine obligation
and cost
4.00
%
4.00
%
4.00
%
48
The discount rate assumptions reflect the rates available on high-quality fixed income debt instruments. These rates have been selected due to their similarity to the projected cash flows of the Executive Death Benefit Plan.
Actuarially projected future benefit payments are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Benefit Payments
2009
$
553
2010
608
2011
665
2012
729
2013
803
2014 – 2018
5,269
Deferred Compensation Plans
The Executive Deferred Compensation Plans are money purchase defined benefit plans. Plan participation was limited to Company executives during the years 1984 to 1986; no new executives have been added since that time. Participants were allowed to defer a portion of their compensation for the years 1984 through 1990. In return, under the plan, each participant receives an individually specified benefit at age 65. Benefits are reduced when the participant elects early retirement. There are no plan assets. Benefits are paid as they come due from the general assets of the Company.
The net periodic benefits costs charged to operating expenses, which were valued with a measurement date of January 1 for each year, consisted of the following components (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Interest cost
$
543
$
568
$
573
Amortization of unrecognized losses
40
59
184
Net periodic benefits costs
$
583
$
627
$
757
Reconciliations of the beginning and ending balances of the projected benefit obligation, which is calculated using a December 31 measurement date, and the status of the benefit obligation follow (in thousands of dollars):
2008
2007
2006
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
$
10,151
$
10,945
$
11,419
Interest cost
543
568
573
Actuarial (gains) losses
(135
)
(104
)
129
Benefits paid
(1,226
)
(1,258
)
(1,176
)
Benefit obligation at end of year
$
9,333
$
10,151
$
10,945
As there are no plan assets, the benefits were paid from the general assets of the Company.
The amounts recognized as the current and long-term portions of the benefit obligation follow (in thousands of dollars):
As of December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Current liabilities
$
1,226
$
1,226
$
1,229
Noncurrent liabilities
8,107
8,925
9,716
Net amounts recognized
$
9,333
$
10,151
$
10,945
Net losses recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive earnings were $0.2 million, $0.4 million and $0.3 million as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The net loss that will be amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive earnings into net periodic benefit cost in 2009 is $22.9 thousand.
The benefit obligation was determined by applying the terms of the plan and actuarial models. These models include various actuarial assumptions, including discount rates, mortality and retirement age. The Company evaluates its actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and considers changes in these long-term factors based upon market conditions and historical experience.
49
The following assumptions were used to determine benefit obligations at December 31:
2008
2007
2006
Discount rate used to determine net periodic benefit cost
(January 1 valuation)
5.70%
5.50%
5.25%
Discount rate used to determine benefit obligation
(December 31 valuation)
6.00%
5.70%
5.50%
The discount rate assumptions reflect the rates available on high-quality fixed income debt instruments. These rates have been selected due to their similarity to the projected cash flows of the Executive Deferred Compensation Plans.
Actuarially projected future benefit payments are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Benefit Payments
2009
$
1,226
2010
1,196
2011
1,162
2012
1,154
2013
1,155
2014 – 2018
4,858
Other Employment-Related Benefit Plans
Certain of the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries provide limited non-pension benefits to retirees in addition to government-mandated programs. The cost of these programs is not significant to the Company. Most retirees outside the United States are covered by government-sponsored and -administered programs.
NOTE 11 – LEASES
The Company leases certain land, buildings and equipment under noncancellable operating leases that expire at various dates through 2036. The Company capitalizes all significant leases that qualify for capitalization, of which there were none at December 31, 2008. Many of the building leases obligate the Company to pay real estate taxes, insurance and certain maintenance costs, and contain multiple renewal provisions, exercisable at the Company’s option. Leases that contain predetermined fixed escalations of the minimum rentals are recognized in rental expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Cash or rent abatements received upon entering into certain operating leases are also recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
At December 31, 2008, the approximate future minimum lease payments for all operating leases were as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Future Minimum Lease Payments
2009
$
41,150
2010
35,718
2011
30,753
2012
26,658
2013
23,259
Thereafter
60,837
Total minimum payments required
$
218,375
Less amounts representing sublease income
(227
)
$
218,148
Rent expense, including items under lease and items rented on a month-to-month basis, was $44.8 million, $42.1 million and $33.4 million for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These amounts are net of sublease income of $0.6 million, $0.5 million and $0.5 million for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
NOTE 12 – STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
The Company maintains stock incentive plans under which the Company may grant a variety of incentive awards to employees and directors. Shares of common stock were authorized for issuance under the plans in connection with awards of non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards. As of December 31, 2008, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, stock units and non-qualified stock options have been granted.
In 2005, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2005 Incentive Plan (“Plan”), which replaced all prior active plans (“Prior Plans”). Awards previously granted under Prior Plans will remain outstanding in accordance with their
50
terms. The Plan authorizes the granting of options to purchase shares at a price of not less than 100% of the closing market price on the last trading day preceding the date of grant. All options expire no later than ten years after the date of grant. A total of 9.5 million shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance under the Plan. As of December 31, 2008, there were 2,548,950 shares available for grant under the Plan.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS No. 123R) using the modified prospective method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized in 2008, 2007 and 2006 includes: (a) compensation costs for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not fully vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value as calculated under the pro forma disclosure-only expense provisions of SFAS No. 123 and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with provisions of SFAS No. 123R.
Pre-tax stock-based compensation expense was $46.1 million, $35.7 million and $34.8 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Related income tax benefits recognized in earnings were $18.2 million, $11.8 million and $11.8 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Options
In 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company provided broad-based stock option grants of 161,400, 162,100 and 187,900 shares, respectively, to those employees who reached major service milestones and were not participants in other stock option programs.
In 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company issued stock option grants to participating employees as part of their incentive compensation. Stock option grants were 721,600, 578,120 and 1,234,400 for the years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the Company’s stock on the last trading day preceding the date of grant. The options generally vest over three years, although accelerated vesting is provided in certain circumstances. Awards generally expire ten years from the grant date.
Transactions involving stock options are summarized as follows:
Shares Subject to Option
Weighted Average Price Per Share
Options Exercisable
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
8,691,840
$
48.37
4,572,250
Granted
1,422,300
$
75.87
Exercised
(1,390,461
)
$
46.35
Canceled or expired
(268,810
)
$
57.88
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
8,454,869
$
53.00
4,627,249
Granted
740,220
$
82.21
Exercised
(2,430,523
)
$
47.74
Canceled or expired
(236,580
)
$
67.29
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
6,527,986
$
58.19
3,447,856
Granted
883,000
$
84.58
Exercised
(953,199
)
$
50.07
Canceled or expired
(103,920
)
$
73.14
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
6,353,867
$
62.95
3,633,612
At December 31, 2008, there was $13.2 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested option awards, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
The following table summarizes information about stock options exercised (in thousands of dollars):
For the years ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Fair value of options exercised
$
12,752
$
31,736
$
18,152
Total intrinsic value of options exercised
$
35,095
$
88,921
$
38,906
Fair value of options vested
$
15,510
$
15,996
$
15,295
Settlements of options exercised
$
47,016
$
113,752
$
64,437
51
Information about stock options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2008, is as follows:
Options Outstanding
Options Exercisable
Weighted Average
Weighted Average
Range of
Exercise
Prices
Number
Remaining
Contractual
Life
Exercise
Price
Intrinsic
Value
(000’s)
Number
Remaining
Contractual
Life
Exercise
Price
Intrinsic
Value
(000’s)
$
37.50 - $44.05
742,155
2.0 Years
$
40.55
$
28,419
742,155
2.0 Years
$
40.55
$
28,419
$
45.50 - $54.85
2,707,052
4.6 Years
$
51.49
74,051
2,705,992
4.6 Years
$
51.49
74,019
$
56.03 - $70.67
139,815
6.1 Years
$
62.08
2,343
138,815
6.1 Years
$
62.02
2,335
$
71.21 - $93.05
2,764,845
8.2 Years
$
80.24
(3,875
)
46,650
7.7 Years
$
77.69
54
6,353,867
5.9 Years
$
62.95
$
100,938
3,633,612
4.2 Years
$
49.99
$
104,827
The Company uses a binomial lattice model for the valuation of stock options. The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $20.82, $22.92 and $18.91, respectively. The fair value of each option granted used the following assumptions:
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Risk-free interest rate
3.2
%
4.6
%
4.9
%
Expected life
6 years
6 years
6 years
Expected volatility
25.2
%
24.3
%
23.9
%
Expected dividend yield
1.8
%
1.7
%
1.5
%
The risk-free interest rate is selected based on yields from U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term approximately equal to the expected term of the options being valued. The expected life selected for options granted during each year presented represents the period of time that the options are expected to be outstanding based on historical data of option holders exercise and termination behavior. Expected volatility is based upon implied and historical volatility of the closing price of the Company’s stock over a period equal to the expected life of each option grant. Historical company information is also the primary basis for selection of expected dividend yield assumptions.
Performance Shares
In 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company awarded performance-based shares to certain executives. Receipt of Company stock is contingent upon the Company meeting sales growth and return on invested capital (ROIC) performance goals. Each participant was granted a base number of shares. At the end of the first year performance period, the number of shares granted will be increased, decreased or remain the same based upon actual Company-wide sales growth versus target sales growth. The shares, as determined at the end of the performance year, will be issued at the end of the third year if the Company’s average target ROIC is achieved during the vesting period.
Performance share value is based upon closing market prices on the last trading day preceding the date of award and is charged to earnings on a straight-line basis over the three year period. Holders of performance shares are entitled to receive cash payments equivalent to cash dividends after the end of the first year performance period. If the performance shares vest, they will be settled by the issuance of Company common stock in exchange for the performance shares on a one-for-one basis.
The following table summarizes the transactions involving performance-based share awards:
2008
2007
2006
Shares
Weighted Average
Shares
Weighted Average
Shares
Weighted Average
Beginning nonvested
shares outstanding
116,796
$
69.49
37,812
$
71.23
–
$
–
Issuances
38,360
$
86.00
83,089
$
68.64
37,812
$
71.23
Cancellations
–
$
–
(4,105
)
$
69.00
–
$
–
Vestings
(37,260
)
$
71.23
–
$
–
–
$
–
Ending nonvested
shares outstanding
117,896
$
75.13
116,796
$
69.49
37,812
$
71.23
At December 31, 2008, the unearned compensation related to performance-based share awards outstanding was $3.8 million, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
52
Restricted Stock
The plans authorize the granting of restricted stock, which is held by the Company pursuant to the terms and conditions related to the applicable grants. Except for the right of disposal, holders of restricted stock have full shareholders’ rights during the period of restriction, including voting rights and the right to receive dividends. Restricted stock grants have original vesting periods of six to ten years.
Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards is based upon the closing market price on the last trading day preceding the date of grant and is charged to earnings on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The following table summarizes the transactions involving restricted stock granted to employees:
2008
2007
2006
Shares
Weighted Average
Shares
Weighted Average
Shares
Weighted Average
Beginning nonvested
shares outstanding
65,000
$
52.37
105,000
$
51.05
270,000
$
44.75
Cancellations
–
$
–
–
$
–
(10,000
)
$
57.07
Vesting
(15,000
)
$
48.15
(40,000
)
$
48.73
(155,000
)
$
37.91
Ending nonvested
shares outstanding
50,000
$
53.50
65,000
$
52.37
105,000
$
51.05
Fair value of
shares vested
$1.3 million
$3.0 million
$11.1 million
At December 31, 2008, there was $0.1 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock, which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted average period of 0.7 years.
Restricted Stock Units (RSUs)
Awards of RSUs are provided for under the stock compensation plans. RSUs granted vest over periods from two to seven years from issuance, although accelerated vesting is provided in certain instances. Holders of RSUs are entitled to receive cash payments equivalent to cash dividends and other distributions paid with respect to common stock. At various times after vesting, RSUs will be settled by the issuance of stock evidencing the conversion of the RSUs into shares of the Company common stock on a one-for-one basis. Compensation expense related to RSUs is based upon the closing market prices on the last trading day preceding the date of award and is charged to earnings on a straight-line basis over the vesting period.
The following table summarizes RSUs activity:
2008
2007
2006
Shares
Weighted
Average
Shares
Weighted
Average
Shares
Weighted
Average
Beginning nonvested units
982,568
$
72.91
740,200
$
65.24
517,000
$
49.74
Issuances
460,423
$
84.35
421,003
$
83.53
408,300
$
75.54
Cancellations
(33,490
)
$
78.72
(74,030
)
$
71.99
(26,750
)
$
66.84
Vestings
(172,255
)
$
64.37
(104,605
)
$
75.85
(158,350
)
$
58.68
Ending nonvested units
1,237,246
$
77.88
982,568
$
72.91
740,200
$
65.24
Fair value of
shares vested
$11.1 million
$7.5 million
$8.4 million
At December 31, 2008, there was $47.3 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested RSUs which the Company expects to recognize over a weighted average period of 3.0 years.
Director Stock Awards
The Company provides members of the Board of Directors with deferred stock unit grants. A stock unit is the economic equivalent of a share of common stock. Beginning in April 2008, the number of units covered by each grant is equal to $100,000 divided by the fair market value of a share of common stock at the time of the grant, rounded up to the next ten-unit increment. Prior to April 2008, the number of units covered by each grant was equal to $60,000 divided by the fair market value of a share of common stock at the time of the grant, rounded up to the next ten-unit increment. The Company also awards stock units in connection with elective deferrals of director fees and dividend equivalents on existing stock units. Deferred fees and dividend equivalents on existing stock units are converted into stock units on the basis of the market value of the stock at the relevant times. Payment of the value of stock units is scheduled to be made after termination of service as a director. As of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, there were eleven nonemployee directors who held stock units.
53
The Company recognizes income (expense) for the change in value of equivalent stock units. The following table summarizes activity for stock units related to deferred director fees (dollars in thousands):
2008
2007
2006
Units
Dollars
Units
Dollars
Units
Dollars
Beginning balance
74,522
$
6,522
61,242
$
4,283
51,977
$
3,696
Dividends
1,692
137
1,099
95
902
64
Deferred fees
17,007
1,460
12,181
1,012
14,844
1,128
Retirement
distributions
–
–
–
–
(6,481
)
(461
)
Unit appreciation
(depreciation)
–
(769
)
–
1,132
–
(144
)
Ending balance
93,221
$
7,350
74,522
$
6,522
61,242
$
4,283
NOTE 13– CAPITAL STOCK
The Company had no shares of preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. The activity related to outstanding common stock and common stock held in treasury was as follows:
2008
2007
2006
Outstanding Common Stock
Treasury Stock
Outstanding Common Stock
Treasury Stock
Outstanding Common Stock
Treasury Stock
Balance at beginning of period
79,459,415
30,199,804
84,067,627
25,590,311
89,715,641
19,952,297
Exercise of stock options, net of 2,725, 3,318 and 0 shares swapped in stock-for-stock exchange
950,474
(950,474
)
2,427,205
(2,427,205
)
1,390,461
(1,390,461
)
Cancellation of shares related to tax withholdings on restricted stock vesting
(4,874
)
4,874
(14,867
)
14,867
(59,297
)
59,297
Settlement of restricted stock units, net of 48,488, 16,739 and 6,228 shares retained, respectively
101,962
(101,962
)
31,057
(29,776
)
13,822
(13,822
)
Cancellation of restricted shares
–
–
–
–
(10,000
)
–
Purchase of treasury shares
(5,725,948
)
5,725,948
(7,051,607
)
7,051,607
(6,983,000
)
6,983,000
Balance at end of period
74,781,029
34,878,190
79,459,415
30,199,804
84,067,627
25,590,311
On August 20, 2007, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement (ASR) with Goldman, Sachs & Co. (Goldman) to purchase $500 million of its outstanding common stock. The Company paid Goldman $500 million on August 23, 2007, in exchange for an initial delivery of 5,316,007 shares. The ASR was treated as an equity transaction. At settlement, the Company was to receive or pay additional shares of its common stock or cash (at Grainger’s option), based upon the volume weighted average price during the term of the agreement. Accordingly, on January 4, 2008, the Company received 415,274 shares of its common stock from Goldman as final settlement of the ASR. A total of 5,731,281 shares were repurchased under the ASR.
54
NOTE 14 – ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS
The following table sets forth the components of Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (losses)
(in thousands of dollars)
:
As of December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Foreign currency translation adjustments
$
3,943
$
94,683
$
31,859
Effect of adopting SFAS No. 158 related to postretirement benefit plans and
other employment-related benefit plans
–
–
(36,783
)
Postretirement benefit plan
Prior service credit
9,377
10,592
–
Transition asset
857
1,000
–
Unrecognized (losses)
(73,966
)
(25,405
)
–
Unrecognized gains (losses) on other employment-related benefit plans
(68
)
1,335
(524
)
Deferred tax asset (liability)
21,332
(10,034
)
8,879
Total accumulated other comprehensive earnings (losses)
$
(38,525
)
$
72,171
$
3,431
Foreign currency translation adjustments result from the translation of assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries. The decrease in foreign currency translation adjustments in 2008 is primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus the Canadian dollar and Mexican peso.
In 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132R” (SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize in its statement of financial position an asset for a plan’s overfunded status or a liability for a plan’s underfunded status, measure a plan’s assets and its obligations that determine its funded status as of the end of the employer’s fiscal year (with limited exceptions), and recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan in the year in which the changes occur. SFAS No. 158 requires recognition of funded status changes of a defined benefit postretirement and other employment-related benefit plans within accumulated other comprehensive earnings, net of tax, to the extent such changes are not recognized in earnings as components of net periodic benefit costs. The Company adopted SFAS No. 158 in 2006 and recorded an additional liability of $36.8 million to Accrued employment-related benefit costs offset by $14.3 million of deferred income taxes and a reduction of Accumulated other comprehensive earnings. The increase in unrecognized losses in 2008 is primarily due to the impact of a reduction in discount rates and losses on plan assets.
NOTE 15 – INCOME TAXES
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse.
Income tax expense consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Current provision:
Federal
$
246,731
$
238,220
$
172,961
State
39,673
42,401
31,725
Foreign
18,044
15,329
5,080
Total current
304,448
295,950
209,766
Deferred tax provision (benefit):
Federal
(5,968
)
(28,520
)
8,996
State
(1,049
)
(5,013
)
1,636
Foreign
432
(676
)
(774
)
Total deferred
(6,585
)
(34,209
)
9,858
Total provision
$
297,863
$
261,741
$
219,624
55
Earnings before income taxes by geographical area consisted of the following (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
United States
$
731,315
$
646,762
$
588,322
Foreign
41,903
35,099
14,701
$
773,218
$
681,861
$
603,023
The income tax effects of temporary differences that gave rise to the net deferred tax asset were (in thousands of dollars):
As of December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Deferred tax assets:
Inventory
$
22,674
$
19,577
$
13,809
Accrued expenses
29,966
30,295
28,606
Accrued employment-related benefits
144,125
111,147
99,006
Foreign operating loss carryforwards
10,833
10,239
9,530
Property, buildings and equipment
921
3,189
–
Other
11,352
8,064
8,582
Deferred tax assets
219,871
182,511
159,533
Less valuation allowance
(15,977
)
(13,551
)
(13,461
)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
$
203,894
$
168,960
$
146,072
Deferred tax liabilities:
Purchased tax benefits
$
(5,812
)
$
(6,779
)
$
(7,715
)
Property, buildings and equipment
-
–
(4,303
)
Intangibles
(17,083
)
(16,884
)
(14,182
)
Software
(12,774
)
(9,710
)
(10,627
)
Prepaids
(21,893
)
(16,625
)
(14,111
)
Foreign currency gain
(2,206
)
(13,661
)
(4,453
)
Deferred tax liabilities
(59,768
)
(63,659
)
(55,391
)
Net deferred tax asset
$
144,126
$
105,301
$
90,681
The net deferred tax asset is classified as follows:
Current assets
$
52,556
$
56,663
$
48,123
Noncurrent assets
97,442
54,658
48,793
Noncurrent liabilities (foreign)
(5,872
)
(6,020
)
(6,235
)
Net deferred tax asset
$
144,126
$
105,301
$
90,681
At December 31, 2008, the Company had $34.8 million of foreign operating loss carryforwards related to foreign operations, some of which begin to expire in 2009. The valuation allowance represents a provision for uncertainty as to the realization of the tax benefits of these carryforwards. In addition, the Company recorded a valuation allowance to reflect the estimated amount of deferred tax assets that may not be realized.
56
The changes in the valuation allowance were as follows (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Beginning balance
$
13,551
$
13,461
$
10,872
Increase (decrease) related to foreign net operating loss carryforwards
86
1,329
(70
)
Increase (decrease) related to capital losses and other
2,340
(1,239
)
2,659
Ending balance
$
15,977
$
13,551
$
13,461
A reconciliation of income tax expense with federal income taxes at the statutory rate follows (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Federal income tax at the 35% statutory rate
$
270,626
$
238,651
$
211,058
State income taxes, net of federal income
tax benefit
25,105
24,302
22,795
Resolution of prior year tax contingencies
–
–
(12,200
)
Other – net
2,132
(1,212
)
(2,029
)
Income tax expense
$
297,863
$
261,741
$
219,624
Effective tax rate
38.5
%
38.4
%
36.4
%
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries at December 31, 2008, amounted to $31.5 million. No provision for deferred U.S. income taxes has been made for these subsidiaries because the Company intends to permanently reinvest such earnings in those foreign operations.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48. As a result, the Company recognized a decrease of approximately $0.9 million in the liability for tax uncertainties, which resulted in an increase to the January 1, 2007, balance of Retained earnings.
The changes in the liability for tax uncertainties, excluding interest, are as follows (in thousands of dollars):
2008
2007
Balance at beginning of year
$
13,568
$
15,274
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
13,016
3,060
Additions for tax positions of prior years
735
–
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
(2,900
)
(4,729
)
Settlements (audit payments) refunds – net
(55
)
(37
)
Balance at end of year
$
24,364
$
13,568
The Company classifies the liability for tax uncertainties in Deferred income taxes and tax uncertainties. Included in this amount is $7.4 million and $3.3 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, of tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Any changes in the timing of deductibility of these items would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authorities to an earlier period.
The Company regularly undergoes examination of its federal income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The Company and the IRS have settled tax years through 2004. The Company is not currently under examination by the IRS nor under notice of a pending examination. The Company is also subject to state and local income tax audits and foreign jurisdiction tax audits. The Company’s tax years 2002 – 2008 remain subject to state and local audits. Tax years 2003 – 2008 remain open to foreign audits. The Company’s estimated amount of liability associated with the Company’s uncertain tax positions may decrease within the next twelve months due to expiring statutes, tax payments or audit activity.
The Company recognizes interest expense in the provision for income taxes. During 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized interest of $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, the Company accrued $1.9 million and $1.1 million for interest.
57
NOTE 16 – EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is based on the combination of weighted average number of shares outstanding and dilutive potential shares. The Company had outstanding stock options of 2.6 million, 0.01 million and 1.36 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common stock.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except for per share amounts):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Net earnings
$
475,355
$
420,120
$
383,399
Denominator for basic earnings per share – weighted average shares
76,580
82,404
87,839
Effect of dilutive securities – stock-based compensation
2,170
2,641
2,685
Denominator for diluted earnings per share – weighted average shares
adjusted for dilutive
securities
78,750
85,045
90,524
Basic earnings per common share
$
6.21
$
5.10
$
4.36
Diluted earnings per common share
$
6.04
$
4.94
$
4.24
NOTE 17 – PREFERRED SHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS
The Company has a shareholder rights plan, under which there is outstanding one preferred share purchase right (Right) for each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock. Each Right, under certain circumstances, may be exercised to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A-1999 Junior Participating Preferred Stock (intended to be the economic equivalent of one share of the Company’s common stock) at a price of $250.00, subject to adjustment. The Rights become exercisable only after a person or group, other than a person or group exempt under the plan, acquires or announces a tender offer for 15% or more of the Company’s common stock. If a person or group, other than a person or group exempt under the plan, acquires 15% or more of the Company’s common stock or if the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction, each Right generally entitles the holder, other than such person or group, to purchase, at the then-current exercise price, stock and/or other securities or assets of the Company or the acquiring company having a market value of twice the exercise price.
The Rights expire on May 15, 2009, unless earlier redeemed. They generally are redeemable at $.001 per Right until thirty days following announcement that a person or group, other than a person or group exempt under the plan, has acquired 15% or more of the Company’s common stock. The Rights do not have voting or dividend rights and, until they become exercisable, have no dilutive effect on the earnings of the Company.
NOTE 18 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company has three reportable segments: Grainger Branch-based, Acklands
–
Grainger Branch-based and Lab Safety. Grainger Branch-based is an aggregation of the following business units which offer similar services and products: Grainger Industrial Supply, Grainger, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico), Grainger Caribe Inc. (Puerto Rico), Grainger China LLC (China) and Grainger Panama S.A. (Panama). Acklands
–
Grainger is the Company’s Canadian branch-based distribution business. Lab Safety is a direct marketer of safety and other industrial products. During 2009, Grainger will be integrating the Lab Safety business into the Grainger Industrial Supply business as well as reviewing the Company's current operating structure to ensure that it will meet the current and future needs of the business. The Company is also evaluating the impact that this integration will have on reportable segments. Any changes to reportable segments will include a restatement of prior periods for consistency purposes.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Intersegment transfer prices are established at external selling prices, less costs not incurred due to a related party sale.
58
The following is the segment information (in thousands of dollars):
2008
Grainger
Branch-based
Acklands – Grainger
Branch-based
Lab
Safety
Total
Total net sales
$
5,678,823
$
727,989
$
450,725
$
6,857,537
Intersegment net sales
(3,556
)
(127
)
(3,822
)
(7,505
)
Net sales to external customers
5,675,267
727,862
446,903
6,850,032
Segment operating earnings
782,747
54,263
45,386
882,396
Segment assets
2,216,282
448,660
225,494
2,890,436
Depreciation and amortization
107,367
10,506
9,333
127,206
Additions to long-lived assets
$
166,807
$
24,337
$
15,337
$
206,481
2007
Grainger
Branch-based
Acklands – Grainger
Branch-based
Lab
Safety
Total
Total net sales
$
5,352,520
$
636,524
$
434,663
$
6,423,707
Intersegment net sales
(1,997
)
–
(3,696
)
(5,693
)
Net sales to external customers
5,350,523
636,524
430,967
6,418,014
Segment operating earnings
669,441
44,218
54,287
767,946
Segment assets
2,107,408
502,414
212,627
2,822,449
Depreciation and amortization
100,082
10,786
9,126
119,994
Additions to long-lived assets
$
155,936
$
10,794
$
7,844
$
174,574
2006
Grainger
Branch-based
Acklands – Grainger
Branch-based
Lab
Safety
Total
Total net sales
$
4,910,836
$
565,098
$
411,511
$
5,887,445
Intersegment net sales
(1,214
)
–
(2,577
)
(3,791
)
Net sales to external customers
4,909,622
565,098
408,934
5,883,654
Segment operating earnings
593,455
15,242
52,283
660,980
Segment assets
1,938,270
394,707
215,515
2,548,492
Depreciation and amortization
88,753
9,505
8,099
106,357
Additions to long-lived assets
$
112,414
$
8,238
$
37,733
$
158,385
59
Following are reconciliations of the segment information with the consolidated totals per the financial statements (in thousands of dollars):
2008
2007
2006
Operating earnings:
Total operating earnings for reportable
segments
$
882,396
$
767,946
$
660,980
Unallocated expenses
(99,724
)
(97,293
)
(82,909
)
Total consolidated operating earnings
$
782,672
$
670,653
$
578,071
Assets:
Total assets for reportable segments
$
2,890,436
$
2,822,449
$
2,548,492
Unallocated assets
624,981
271,579
497,596
Total consolidated assets
$
3,515,417
$
3,094,028
$
3,046,088
2008
Segment
Totals
Unallocated
Consolidated Total
Other significant items:
Depreciation and amortization
$
127,206
$
12,364
$
139,570
Additions to long-lived assets
$
206,481
$
7,508
$
213,989
Revenues
Long-lived Assets
Geographic information:
United States
$
5,953,205
$
998,529
Canada
731,131
176,174
Other foreign countries
165,696
41,217
$
6,850,032
$
1,215,920
2007
Segment
Totals
Unallocated
Consolidated Total
Other significant items:
Depreciation and amortization
$
119,994
$
12,005
$
131,999
Additions to long-lived assets
$
174,574
$
25,558
$
200,132
Revenues
Long-lived Assets
Geographic information:
United States
$
5,643,500
$
961,624
Canada
640,121
206,133
Other foreign countries
134,393
20,135
$
6,418,014
$
1,187,892
60
2006
Segment
Totals
Unallocated
Consolidated Total
Other significant items:
Depreciation and amortization
$
106,357
$
12,211
$
118,568
Additions to long-lived assets
$
158,385
$
14,268
$
172,653
Revenues
Long-Lived Assets
Geographic information:
United States
$
5,197,240
$
909,188
Canada
567,626
176,097
Other foreign countries
118,788
8,784
$
5,883,654
$
1,094,069
Long-lived assets consist of property, buildings, equipment, capitalized software, goodwill and other intangibles.
Revenues are attributed to countries based on the ship-to location of the customer.
Unallocated expenses and unallocated assets primarily relate to the Company headquarters’ support services, which are not part of any business segment. Unallocated expenses include payroll and benefits, depreciation and other costs associated with headquarters-related support services. Unallocated assets include non-operating cash and cash equivalents, certain prepaid expenses and property, buildings and equipment – net.
Unallocated assets increased $353.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2008, when compared with the prior year primarily driven by an increase in non-operating cash and cash equivalents and an increase in deferred tax assets. In 2007, the Company used cash to repurchase shares. In 2008, fewer shares were repurchased, and in addition, a $500 million term loan was obtained, resulting in higher cash balances.
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2008, is as follows (in thousands of dollars):
Acklands – Grainger Branch-based
Lab Safety
Total
Balance at January 1, 2006
$
120,779
$
61,947
$
182,726
Acquisitions
–
28,276
28,276
Translation
(331
)
–
(331
)
Balance at December 31, 2006
120,448
90,223
210,671
Acquisition
–
1,473
1,473
Translation
20,884
–
20,884
Balance at December 31, 2007
141,332
91,696
233,028
Acquisitions
4,381
2,372
6,753
Translation
(26,622
)
–
(26,622
)
Balance at December 31, 2008
$
119,091
$
94,068
$
213,159
61
NOTE 19 – SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
A summary of selected quarterly information for 2008 and 2007 is as follows
(in thousands of dollars, except for per share amounts)
:
2008 Quarter Ended
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
Total
Net sales
$
1,661,046
$
1,756,856
$
1,839,475
$
1,592,655
$
6,850,032
Cost of merchandise sold
981,112
1,050,979
1,097,127
912,592
4,041,810
Gross profit
679,934
705,877
742,348
680,063
2,808,222
Warehousing, marketing and
administrative expenses
494,111
521,042
510,891
499,506
2,025,550
Operating earnings
185,823
184,835
231,457
180,557
782,672
Net earnings
114,238
113,179
140,023
107,915
475,355
Earnings per share - basic
1.47
1.48
1.84
1.42
6.21
Earnings per share - diluted
$
1.43
$
1.43
$
1.79
$
1.39
$
6.04
2007 Quarter Ended
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
Total
Net sales
$
1,546,658
$
1,601,011
$
1,658,592
$
1,611,753
$
6,418,014
Cost of merchandise sold
914,570
960,546
999,003
940,272
3,814,391
Gross profit
632,088
640,465
659,589
671,481
2,603,623
Warehousing, marketing and
administrative expenses
469,503
473,890
485,257
504,320
1,932,970
Operating earnings
162,585
166,575
174,332
167,161
670,653
Net earnings
101,787
104,791
109,150
104,392
420,120
Earnings per share - basic
1.21
1.25
1.33
1.32
5.10
Earnings per share - diluted
$
1.17
$
1.21
$
1.29
$
1.28
$
4.94
NOTE 20 – UNCLASSIFIED – NET
The components of Unclassified – net were as follows (in thousands of dollars):
For the Years Ended December 31,
2008
2007
2006
Foreign currency gains – net
$
2,404
$
54
$
31
Income items
242
350
328
Expense items
(295
)
(363
)
(228
)
Unclassified – net
$
2,351
$
41
$
131
62
NOTE 21 – CONTINGENCIES AND LEGAL MATTERS
Grainger has been named, along with numerous other nonaffiliated companies, as a defendant in litigation in various states involving asbestos and/or silica. These lawsuits typically assert claims of personal injury arising from alleged exposure to asbestos and/or silica as a consequence of products purportedly distributed by Grainger. As of February 3, 2009, Grainger is named in cases filed on behalf of approximately 2,200 plaintiffs in which there is an allegation of exposure to asbestos and/or silica. Grainger has denied, or intends to deny, the allegations in all of the above-described lawsuits.
In 2008, lawsuits relating to asbestos and/or silica and involving approximately 660 plaintiffs were dismissed with respect to Grainger, typically based on the lack of product identification. If a specific product distributed by Grainger is identified in any of these lawsuits, Grainger would attempt to exercise indemnification remedies against the product manufacturer. In addition, Grainger believes that a substantial number of these claims are covered by insurance. Grainger has entered agreements with its major insurance carriers relating to the scope, coverage and costs of defense. While Grainger is unable to predict the outcome of these lawsuits, it believes that the ultimate resolution will not have, either individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on Grainger’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Grainger is a party to a contract with the United States General Services Administration (the “GSA”) first entered into in 1999 and subsequently extended in 2004. The GSA contract had been the subject of an audit performed by the GSA’s Office of the Inspector General. In December 2007, the Company received a letter from the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Civil Division of the Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) regarding the GSA contract. The letter suggested that the Company had not complied with its disclosure obligations and the contract’s pricing provisions, and had potentially overcharged government customers under the contract.
Discussions relating to the Company’s compliance with its disclosure obligations and the contract’s pricing provisions are ongoing. The timing and outcome of these discussions are uncertain and could include settlement or civil litigation by the DOJ to recover, among other amounts, treble damages and penalties under the False Claims Act. While this matter is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, an unfavorable resolution could result in significant payments by the Company. The Company continues to believe that it has complied with the GSA contract in all material respects.
In addition to the foregoing, from time to time Grainger is involved in various other legal and administrative proceedings that are incidental to its business, including claims relating to product liability, general negligence, environmental issues, employment, intellectual property and other matters. As a government contractor, Grainger is also subject to governmental or regulatory inquiries or audits or other proceedings, including those related to pricing compliance. It is not expected that the ultimate resolution of any of these matters will have, either individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on Grainger’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
NOTE 22 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On February 11, 2009, the Company announced the elimination of 300 to 400 jobs across the Company’s work force as a result of lower sales volume and the combination of its Lab Safety Supply and Grainger Industrial Supply businesses. One-time cash severance charges of approximately $15 million to $20 million are expected to be recognized between now and the end of the calendar year. Severance payments will be paid out over varying periods.
63