UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
For the transition period from to
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 0-2610
ZIONS BANCORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
UTAH
87-0227400
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
ONE SOUTH MAIN, SUITE 1134
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
84111
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (801) 524-4787
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
ZIONS BANCORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
PART I.
ITEM 1.
Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
ITEM 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
ITEM 4.
Controls and Procedures
PART II.
Legal Proceedings
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
ITEM 6.
Exhibits
SIGNATURES
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30,
2005
December 31,
2004
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks
Money market investments:
Interest-bearing deposits
Federal funds sold
Security resell agreements
Investment securities:
Held to maturity, at cost (approximate market value $649,808, $641,783 and $634,127)
Available for sale, at market
Trading account, at market (includes $102,916, $163,248 and $369,883 transferred as collateral under repurchase agreements)
Loans:
Loans held for sale
Loans and leases
Less:
Unearned income and fees, net of related costs
Allowance for loan losses
Loans and leases, net of allowance
Other noninterest-bearing investments
Premises and equipment, net
Goodwill
Core deposit and other intangibles
Other real estate owned
Other assets
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing demand
Interest-bearing:
Savings and money market
Time under $100,000
Time $100,000 and over
Foreign
Securities sold, not yet purchased
Federal funds purchased
Security repurchase agreements
Other liabilities
Commercial paper
Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other borrowings:
One year or less
Over one year
Long-term debt
Total liabilities
Minority interest
Shareholders’ equity:
Capital stock:
Preferred stock, without par value; authorized 3,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, none
Common stock, without par value; authorized 350,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 90,062,646, 89,829,947 and 89,752,384 shares
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Cost of shares held in trust for deferred compensation and other
Total shareholders’ equity
3
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
Six Months Ended
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans
Interest on loans held for sale
Lease financing
Interest on money market investments
Interest on securities:
Held to maturity – taxable
Held to maturity – nontaxable
Available for sale – taxable
Available for sale – nontaxable
Trading account
Total interest income
Interest expense:
Interest on savings and money market deposits
Interest on time and foreign deposits
Interest on borrowed funds
Total interest expense
Net interest income
Provision for loan losses
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
Noninterest income:
Service charges and fees on deposit accounts
Loan sales and servicing income
Other service charges, commissions and fees
Trust and investment management income
Income from securities conduit
Dividends and other investment income
Market making, trading and nonhedge derivative income
Equity securities losses, net
Fixed income securities gains (losses), net
Other
Total noninterest income
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits
Occupancy, net
Furniture and equipment
Legal and professional services
Postage and supplies
Advertising
Impairment losses on long-lived assets
Restructuring charges
Amortization of core deposit and other intangibles
Provision for unfunded lending commitments
Total noninterest expense
Income before income taxes and minority interest
Income taxes
Net income
Weighted average shares outstanding during the period:
Basic shares
Diluted shares
Net income per common share:
Basic
Diluted
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
(In thousands)
Balance, December 31, 2004
Comprehensive income:
Net income for the period
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Net realized and unrealized holding gains during the period, net of income tax expense of $1,728
Foreign currency translation
Reclassification for net realized gains recorded in operations, net of income tax expense of $94
Net unrealized losses on derivative instruments, net of reclassification to operations of $10,832 and income tax benefit of $4,074
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Total comprehensive income
Stock redeemed and retired
Restricted stock issued and stock options exercised, net of shares tendered and retired
Cash dividends – common, $.72 per share
Balance, June 30, 2005
Balance, December 31, 2003
Net realized and unrealized holding losses during the period, net of income tax benefit of $4,739
Reclassification for net realized gains recorded in operations, net of income tax expense of $723
Net unrealized losses on derivative instruments, net of reclassification to operations of $24,505 and income tax benefit of $15,447
Other comprehensive loss
Stock options exercised, net of shares tendered and retired
Cash dividends – common, $.62 per share
Cost of shares held in trust for deferred compensation
Balance, June 30, 2004
Total comprehensive income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 was $156,629 and $42,378, respectively.
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Impairment losses on long lived assets
Depreciation of premises and equipment
Amortization
Deferred income tax benefit
Loss allocated to minority interest
Fixed income securities losses (gains), net
Net decrease (increase) in trading securities
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale
Additions to loans held for sale
Net gains on sales of loans, leases and other assets
Net increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance
Undistributed earnings of affiliates
Change in accrued income taxes
Change in accrued interest receivable
Change in other assets
Change in other liabilities
Change in accrued interest payable
Other, net
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Net decrease (increase) in money market investments
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities held to maturity
Purchases of investment securities held to maturity
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale
Purchases of investment securities available for sale
Proceeds from sales of loans and leases
Net increase in loans and leases
Net increase in other noninterest-bearing investments
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment
Purchases of premises and equipment
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned
Net cash received from acquisitions
Net cash paid for net liabilities on branches sold
Net cash used in investing activities
6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase in deposits
Net change in short-term funds borrowed
Payments on FHLB advances and other borrowings over one year
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Payments on long-term debt
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
Payments to redeem common stock
Dividends paid
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase in cash and due from banks
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period
Cash and due from banks at end of period
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOWINFORMATION:
Cash paid for:
Interest
Loans transferred to other real estate owned
Investment securities available for sale transferred to investmentsecurities held to maturity
7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2005
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Zions Bancorporation (“the Parent”) and its majority-owned subsidiaries (collectively “the Company,” “we,” “our,” “us”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. This includes a reclassification of certain fees previously classified as interest and fees on loans in interest income to other service charges, commissions and fees in noninterest income. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004, the amounts reclassified were $3.3 million and $6.1 million, which had the effect of reducing the net interest margin from 4.20% to 4.15% and from 4.26% to 4.21% for the respective periods. There was no impact on net income.
Operating results for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in future periods. The balance sheet at December 31, 2004 is from the audited financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Zions Bancorporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
2. OTHER RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENT
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants has issued Statement of Position 03-3, (“SOP 03-3”), Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer. SOP 03-3 requires acquired loans, including debt securities, to be recorded at the amount of the purchaser’s initial investment and prohibits carrying over valuation allowances from the seller for those individually-evaluated loans that have evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination, and it is probable all contractual cash flows on the loan will be unable to be collected. SOP 03-3 also requires the excess of all undiscounted cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition over the purchaser’s initial investment to be recognized as interest income on a level-yield basis over the life of the loan. Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be collected are recognized prospectively through an adjustment of the loan’s yield over its remaining life, while subsequent decreases are recognized as impairment. Loans carried at fair value, mortgage loans held for sale, and loans to borrowers in good standing under revolving credit agreements are excluded from the scope of SOP 03-3. The guidance is effective for loans acquired in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004. Management is not able at this time to determine the effect SOP 03-3 will have on the pending acquisition discussed in Note 7.
8
3. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The following disclosures are required for interim financial statements by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). SFAS 148 provides guidance to transition from the intrinsic value method of accounting for share-based compensation under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB 25”), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, to the fair value method under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
The impact on net income and net income per common share if we had applied the provisions of SFAS 123 to share-based payments was as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Net income, as reported
Deduct: Total share-based compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all
awards, net of related tax effects
Pro forma net income
Basic – as reported
Basic – pro forma
Diluted – as reported
Diluted – pro forma
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS 123. SFAS 123R supersedes APB 25 and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. SFAS 123R is effective for public companies for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. On April 15, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it was amending Regulation S-X to provide up to a six-month delay for the adoption of SFAS 123R, or January 1, 2006 for calendar year public companies. The Company expects to adopt SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006.
SFAS 123R utilizes a “modified grant-date” approach in which the fair value of an equity award is estimated on the grant date without regard to service or performance vesting conditions. Generally, this approach is similar to that of SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123R would require all share-based awards to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the statement of income based on their fair values. The pro forma disclosure previously shown that is permitted by SFAS 123 will no longer be an alternative.
Our adoption of SFAS 123R will utilize the “modified prospective” method. Under this method, compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date based on the requirements of SFAS 123R for all share-based awards granted after the effective date, and based on the requirements of SFAS 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123R that remain unvested on the effective date.
As permitted by SFAS 123, we currently account for share-based awards to employees using APB 25’s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognize no compensation cost for employee stock options.
9
Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS 123R’s fair value method will have a significant impact on our reported results of operations, although it will have no impact on our overall financial position. The impact of adopting SFAS 123R cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based awards granted in the future. However, had we adopted SFAS 123R in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS 123 as previously described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and net income per common share.
SFAS 123R also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under current accounting literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. While we cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future (because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options), the amount of operating cash flows recognized in prior years for such excess tax deductions has not been significant.
In May 2005, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register 8.9 million shares of our common stock in connection with the Zions Bancorporation 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. Awards under this plan are granted to officers, employees, directors, and other designated individuals, and may be in the form of incentive and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted and unrestricted stock, and other types of awards. No new awards will be granted under the Company’s Key Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1998 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Incentive Plan, or 1996 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan.
4. GUARANTEES
The following are guarantees issued by the Company (in thousands):
Standby letters of credit:
Financial
Performance
The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 contains further information on the nature of these letters of credit along with their terms and collateral requirements. At June 30, 2005, the carrying value recorded by the Company as a liability for these guarantees was $3.8 million.
As of June 30, 2005, the Parent has guaranteed approximately $580.3 million of debt issued by a subsidiary and by affiliated trusts issuing trust preferred securities. The trusts and related trust preferred securities are described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Zions First National Bank (“ZFNB”) provides a liquidity facility (“Liquidity Facility”) for a fee to Lockhart Funding, LLC (“Lockhart”), a qualifying special-purpose entity securities conduit. Lockhart purchases floating rate U.S. Government and AAA-rated securities with funds from the issuance of commercial paper. ZFNB also provides interest rate hedging support and administrative and investment advisory services for a fee. Pursuant to the Liquidity Facility contract, ZFNB is required to purchase securities from Lockhart to provide funds for Lockhart to repay maturing commercial paper upon Lockhart’s inability to access the commercial paper market, or upon a commercial paper market disruption as specified in governing documents for Lockhart. Pursuant to the governing documents, including the liquidity agreement, if any
10
security in Lockhart is downgraded below AA-, ZFNB may 1) place its letter of credit on the security, or 2) obtain credit enhancement from a third party, or 3) purchase the security from Lockhart at book value. At any given time, the maximum commitment of ZFNB is the book value of Lockhart’s securities portfolio, which is not allowed to exceed the size of the Liquidity Facility commitment. At June 30, 2005, the book value of Lockhart’s securities portfolio was $5.0 billion, which approximated market value, and the size of the Liquidity Facility commitment was $6.12 billion. No amounts were outstanding under the Liquidity Facility at June 30, 2005.
In June 2005 under the Liquidity Facility contract, ZFNB repurchased a bond security from Lockhart at its book value of $12.4 million because of a rating downgrade. ZFNB recognized an impairment loss of $1.6 million, which was included in fixed income securities gains (losses) for the three months ended June 30, 2005. This security is still rated as investment grade and ZFNB expects to recover its investment plus contractual interest.
The FASB has proposed various guidance to amend SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. This new guidance, among other things, proposes to change the requirements that an entity must meet to be considered a qualifying special-purpose entity. It is possible that Lockhart may need to be restructured to preserve its off-balance sheet status as a qualifying special-purpose entity.
5. RETIREMENT PLANS
The following disclosures are required for interim financial statements by SFAS No. 132R, Employers’ Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (in thousands):
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of net actuarial (gain) loss
Net periodic benefit cost
As disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, we expected to contribute $654 thousand in 2005 to meet estimated benefit payments to participants in our postretirement medical plan. As of June 30, 2005, we have contributed $327 thousand of this amount and expect to contribute the remaining portion during the rest of 2005. We did not expect to make any contributions to the pension plan in 2005 and have not done so as of June 30, 2005.
11
6. GOODWILL
In March 2005, goodwill relating to the California Bank & Trust banking subsidiary was reduced by $3.7 million. This reduction resulted from the recognition of a portion of acquired state net operating loss carryforward benefits. A state examination covering certain years in which some of the net operating loss carryforwards were claimed had closed, allowing for the recognition of the reduction in goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2005. This accounting follows the guidance of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. There was no impact on net income.
7. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 6, 2005, the Company and Amegy Bancorporation, Inc., headquartered in Houston, Texas, announced that they had signed a definitive agreement under which the Company will acquire all of the outstanding common stock of Amegy. Consideration valued on that date would consist of approximately $600 million in cash and approximately 14.25 million shares of the Company’s common stock prior to the effect of any outstanding options, or a total estimated transaction value of approximately $1.7 billion. The acquisition is subject to approval by banking regulators and by Amegy’s shareholders. It is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2005. Upon completion of the transaction, Amegy will operate under its current name, charter and management as a separate banking subsidiary of the Company. At June 30, 2005, Amegy had assets of approximately $7.7 billion and shareholders’ equity of approximately $0.6 billion.
8. OPERATING SEGMENT INFORMATION
We manage our operations and prepare management reports and other information with a primary focus on geographical area. We operate six community/regional banks in distinct geographical areas. Performance assessment and resource allocation are based upon this geographical structure. Zions First National Bank (“ZFNB”) operates 110 branches in Utah and 23 in Idaho. California Bank & Trust (“CB&T”) operates 91 branches in California. Nevada State Bank (“NSB”) operates 69 branches in Nevada. National Bank of Arizona (“NBA”) operates 53 branches in Arizona. Vectra Bank Colorado (“Vectra”) operates 40 branches in Colorado and one branch in New Mexico. The Commerce Bank of Washington (“Commerce”) operates one branch in the state of Washington. The operating segment identified as “Other” includes the parent company, other smaller nonbank operating units, and eliminations of transactions between segments.
The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the Company. Transactions between operating segments are primarily conducted at fair value, resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations. Operating segments pay for centrally provided services based upon estimated or actual usage of those services. We also allocate income among participating banking subsidiaries to better match revenues from hedging strategies to the operating units that gave rise to the exposures being hedged.
12
The following table presents selected operating segment information for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
Nevada
State Bank
National
Bank of
Arizona
CONDENSED INCOME STATEMENT
Net interest income excluding hedge income
Hedge income recorded directly at subsidiary
Allocated hedge income
Noninterest income
Noninterest expense
Income tax expense (benefit)
Net income (loss)
AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET DATA
Assets
Net loans and leases
Deposits
Shareholder’s equity
13
The following table presents selected operating segment information for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
14
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
EARNINGS
Taxable-equivalent net interest income
Taxable-equivalent revenue
PER COMMON SHARE
Net income (diluted)
Dividends
Book value
SELECTED RATIOS
Return on average assets
Return on average common equity
Efficiency ratio
Net interest margin
15
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (Continued)
AVERAGE BALANCES
Total assets
Securities
Total deposits
Core deposits (1)
Shareholders’ equity
Weighted average common and common-equivalent shares outstanding
AT PERIOD END
Sold loans being serviced (2)
Allowance for unfunded lending commitments
Common shares outstanding
Average equity to average assets
Common dividend payout
Tangible common equity ratio
Nonperforming assets
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
Nonperforming assets to net loans and leases and other real estate owned at period end
16
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
Statements in Management’s Discussion and Analysis that are based on other than historical data are forward-looking, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations or forecasts of future events and include, among others:
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, nor should they be relied upon as representing management’s views as of any subsequent date. Forward-looking statements involve significant risks and uncertainties and actual results may differ materially from those presented, either expressed or implied, in Management’s Discussion and Analysis. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to:
In addition, the following factors relating to the Company’s proposed acquisition of Amegy Bancorporation, Inc., among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements: (1) the businesses of Zions Bancorporation and Amegy Bancorporation may not be combined successfully, or such combination may take longer, be more difficult, time-consuming or costly to accomplish than expected; (2) the expected growth opportunities and cost savings from the merger may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; (3) operating costs, customer losses and business disruption following the merger, including adverse effects on
17
relationships with employees, may be greater than expected; (4) governmental approvals of the merger may not be obtained or adverse regulatory conditions may be imposed in connection with governmental approvals of the merger; and (5) the stockholders of Amegy Bancorporation may fail to approve the merger.
Additional factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements are discussed in the 2004 Annual Reports on Form 10-K of Zions Bancorporation and Amegy Bancorporation, Inc. filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and available at the SEC’s Internet site (http://www.sec.gov).
The Company specifically disclaims any obligation to update any factors or to publicly announce the result of revisions to any of the forward-looking statements included herein to reflect future events or developments.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES
The Company has made no significant changes in its critical accounting policies and significant estimates from those as disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Zions Bancorporation (“the Parent”) and subsidiaries (collectively “Zions,” “the Company,” “we,” “our”) reported net income of $118.8 million, or $1.30 per diluted share for the second quarter of 2005 compared with $98.8 million, or $1.09 per diluted share for the second quarter of 2004. The annualized return on average assets was 1.47% in the second quarter of 2005 compared to 1.28% in the second quarter of 2004. For the same comparative periods, the annualized return on average common equity was 16.56% compared to 15.18%. In addition, the efficiency ratio, which is defined as the percentage of noninterest expenses to taxable-equivalent revenue, was 54.8% compared to 57.9% for the second quarter of 2004.
Net income for the first six months of 2005 was $229.0 million or $2.50 per diluted share, compared to $198.5 million or $2.19 per diluted share for the first six months of 2004. For the first six months of 2005, the annualized return on average assets was 1.44% compared to 1.31% for the same period of 2004. For the same comparative periods, the annualized return on average common equity was 16.20% compared to 15.36%. The efficiency ratio for the first six months was 55.7% compared to 57.2% for 2004.
Net Interest Income, Margin and Interest Rate Spreads
Taxable-equivalent net interest income for the second quarter of 2005 increased 17.4% to $336.1 million compared with $286.3 million for the comparable period of 2004. The increase reflects growth in both loans and deposits coupled with the effect of an increase in the net interest margin. For the first six months of 2005, net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent basis was $656.2 million, an increase of 14.9% compared to $571.1 million in 2004. The incremental tax rate used for calculating all taxable-equivalent adjustments is 35% for all periods presented.
The Company’s net interest margin was 4.60% for the second quarter of 2005, compared to 4.53% for the first quarter of 2005 and 4.15% for the second quarter of 2004. Since the middle of 2004, the margin has been positively impacted by the benefits of increasing noninterest-bearing demand deposits and the increasing spreads earned on those deposits. Also, decreases in lower-yielding short-term investments were used to fund higher-yielding loans. The increase in the margin for the second quarter of 2005 continued to be influenced by solid loan growth funded by core deposits, primarily new demand deposits. During the first
18
quarter of 2005, the Company reclassified certain fees from interest income to “Other service charges, commissions and fees” in noninterest income. This had the effect of reducing the net interest margin by four to six basis points in this and prior quarters. Prior quarters have also been reclassified for comparability. While the margin has increased over the past four quarters, we do not expect it to continue to expand and it should now become relatively stable and may even decline slightly.
The yield on average earning assets increased 102 basis points during the second quarter of 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. The average rate paid this quarter on interest-bearing funds increased 83 basis points from the second quarter of 2004. The spread on average interest-bearing funds for the second quarter of 2005 was 4.03%, up from 3.84% for the second quarter of 2004. Comparing the first six months of 2005 with 2004, the yield on average earning assets increased 88 basis points, while the cost of interest-bearing funds increased 76 basis points.
The Federal Reserve continued to monitor the economic environment and raised interest rates twice during the quarter by a combined 0.50%. These increases were followed by corresponding increases in the prime rate charged by most major banks, including Zions’ subsidiary banks. The Federal Reserve has indicated that it will continue its monitoring process and implement additional rate changes as appropriate. However, the size and timing of any such changes are uncertain at this time. The Company expects to continue its efforts to maintain a slightly “asset sensitive” position with regard to interest rate risk. However, its actual position is highly dependent upon changes in both short-term and long-term interest rates, as well as the actual actions of competitors and customers in response to those changes.
19
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS, YIELDS AND RATES
June 30, 2004
Money market investments
Securities:
Held to maturity
Available for sale
Total securities
Net loans and leases (2)
Total loans and leases
Total interest-earning assets
LIABILITIES
Interest-bearing deposits:
Savings and NOW
Money market super NOW
Total interest-bearing deposits
Borrowed funds:
Federal funds purchased and security repurchase agreements
FHLB advances and other borrowings:
Total borrowed funds
Total interest-bearing liabilities
Noninterest-bearing deposits
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Spread on average interest-bearing funds
Taxable-equivalent net interest income and net yield on interest-earning assets
20
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS, YIELDS AND RATES (Continued)
21
Provisions for Credit Losses
The provision for loan losses is the amount of expense that, based on our judgment, is required to maintain the allowance for loan losses at an adequate level based upon the inherent risks in the portfolio. The provision for unfunded lending commitments is used to maintain the allowance for unfunded lending commitments at an adequate level. See “Credit Risk Management” for more information on how we determine the appropriate level for the allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded lending commitments.
The provision for loan losses for the second quarter was $11.4 million compared to $10.3 million for the same period in 2004. On an annualized basis, the provision was 0.20% of average loans for the second quarters of both 2005 and 2004. The provision for unfunded lending commitments was $1.0 million for the second quarter of 2005 compared to $0.6 million for the same period of 2004. From period to period, the amounts of unfunded lending commitments may be subject to sizeable fluctuation due to changes in the timing and volume of loan originations and fundings. The related provision will generally reflect these fluctuations. When combined, the provisions for credit losses for the second quarter of 2005 were $12.5 million compared to $10.9 million for the second quarter of 2004.
The provision for loan losses for the first six months of 2005 was $20.8 million, 3.5% less than the $21.5 million provision for the first six months of 2004. The relative low level of the provision corresponds to the general good credit quality that the Company is experiencing. However, we do not expect that the provision for loan losses can remain at these low levels indefinitely and we believe that the provision may increase at some point in the future. The provision for unfunded lending commitments was $2.7 million for the first half of 2005 compared to ($1.1) million for the same period in 2004, in part reflecting the rising levels of unfunded commitments resulting from the current strong levels of new commitment originations.
Noninterest Income
Compared with the second quarter of 2004, noninterest income for the second quarter of 2005 decreased 3.7%, or $4.1 million. Service charges and fees on deposit accounts decreased 6.0% from the second quarter of 2004. The decline was primarily the result of higher earnings credit rates on commercial transaction accounts as market interest rates continued to rise, and to a lesser extent, lower other fees on consumer accounts. Loan sales and servicing income declined 17.9% compared to the second quarter 2004 mainly as a result of a decision to sell fewer small business loans and decreased gains from sales of residential mortgages and other loans. Other service charges, commissions and fees increased 6.8% reflecting increases in investment fees from public finance operations.
Income from securities conduit represents fees that we receive from Lockhart Funding, a “qualifying special-purpose entity” securities conduit, in return for back-up liquidity, an interest rate agreement and administrative services that Zions First National Bank provides to the entity in accordance with a servicing agreement. The decrease in income for the second quarter of 2005 when compared to the same period in 2004 resulted from compression of spreads between Lockhart’s assets and liabilities.
Dividends and other investment income consist of revenue from the Company’s bank-owned life insurance program, dividends on securities holdings and earnings from investments in unconsolidated companies. The decrease in dividends and other investment income compared to the second quarter of 2004 was caused primarily by a decrease in earnings from the Company’s equity investments.
Market making, trading and nonhedge derivative income increased 7.2% compared with the same period in 2004. Nonhedge derivative income for the second quarter of 2005 was $1.8 million compared to $1.2 million for the comparable period of 2004, and included fair value increases of $0.8 million compared to $0.2 million in 2004. Trading income for the second quarter of 2005 was $4.7 million compared to $4.9 million for the same period in 2004.
22
Equity securities net losses of $2.8 million for the second quarter of 2005 and $5.3 million for the same period in 2004 were primarily comprised of net losses on venture capital equity investments. Adjusted for minority interest and income taxes, the losses related to venture capital funds reduced net income by $1.0 million for the second quarter of 2005 and $2.2 million for the same quarter of 2004. Net fixed income securities losses for the second quarter of 2005 include an impairment loss of $1.6 million on a security that was repurchased from Lockhart Funding, LLC, in accordance with the terms of the Lockhart Liquidity Facility. This is the first security that we have repurchased under the terms of the Liquidity Agreement and the security is still rated at an investment grade level. In addition, we expect to recover our investment plus contractual interest on the security. See “Liquidity” for additional information on Lockhart Funding, LLC.
“Other” noninterest income increased 37.2% compared with the second quarter of 2004 due primarily to a $2.3 million gain on the sale of a branch by Zions First National Bank and a $1.0 million increase in sales of scanners by NetDeposit (a subsidiary of Zions that develops and markets Check 21 software). Other noninterest income for the second quarter of 2004 included the receipt of a $1.6 million cash litigation settlement.
Noninterest income for the first six months of 2005 of $209.5 million decreased 4.5% from $219.4 million for the first six months of 2004. Explanations previously provided for the quarterly changes also apply to the year-to-date changes. Additional explanations of variances follow.
Other service charges, commissions and fees for the first six months of 2005 increased 6.6% compared to the same period in 2004 principally as a result of increases in interchange and loan-related service charges, partially offset by reduced brokerage fees.
Market making, trading and nonhedge derivative income was $10.3 million compared to $12.2 million in the first six months of 2004. Of these amounts, trading income was $9.0 million for 2005 compared to $10.5 million for 2004 and nonhedge derivative income was $1.3 million compared to $1.7 million for 2004.
Equity securities losses includes $4.5 million in net losses on venture capital equity investments, while for the same period in 2004 net losses were $8.5 million. Adjusted for minority interest and income taxes, the losses related to venture capital funds reduced net income by $2.1 million and $5.1 million in the first six months of 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Other noninterest income for the first six months of 2004 also includes $3.7 million from another litigation settlement, $1.5 million from the sale of certain personal trust accounts in Arizona and a $1 million gain on the sale of a building in California.
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2005 of $242.7 million increased $12.7 million or 5.5% over the $230.0 million for the second quarter of 2004. The Company’s efficiency ratio was 54.8% for the second quarter of 2005 compared to 57.9% for the same period of 2004.
Salaries and employee benefits increased $8.9 million or 6.9%, compared to the second quarter of 2004. However, salaries and employee benefits were essentially unchanged when compared to the first quarter of 2005. The increase from the prior year was due principally to higher staff levels resulting from business expansion coupled with increases in incentive plan costs. Over the past year, the Company has specifically increased staffing related to its new Private Client Services business and the activities related to NetDeposit. In addition in the last half of 2004, the Company hired of a team of commercial lending officers in Utah and Idaho formerly with Washington Mutual Bank.
23
Legal and professional services declined 19.5% when compared to the second quarter of 2004. The amounts for 2004 reflect the costs associated with the major systems conversions at National Bank of Arizona. “Other” noninterest expense increased $5.7 million or 14.5% when compared to the same period in 2004. The increase is primarily attributable to increased bankcard expense, growth in credit-related expense, higher data processing costs and increased NetDeposit scanner costs.
Noninterest expense for the first six months of 2005 of $482.0 million increased 6.6% from $452.3 million for the first six months of 2004. The Company’s efficiency ratio was 55.7% for the first six months of 2005 compared to 57.2% for the same period of 2004. Explanations previously provided for the quarterly changes also apply to the year-to-date changes. Additional explanations of variances follow.
Salaries and employee benefits for the first half of 2005 increased $16.7 million or 6.4% when compared to the same period in 2004 primarily as a result of higher incentive plan costs and increases in staff. Other noninterest expense for the first six months of 2005 increased $10.2 million or 13.3% compared to the first half of 2004. In addition to the factors previously mentioned, higher fidelity insurance premiums also added to the year-to-date increase.
As discussed in Note 3 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS 123R requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, be recognized in the statement of income for all awards that vest based on their fair values. On April 15, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced that it was amending Regulation S-X to provide up to a six-month delay for the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, or January 1, 2006 for calendar year public companies. The Company intends to adopt the standard on January 1, 2006. Upon adoption of this Statement, salaries and employee benefits expense will increase.
At June 30, 2005, the Company had 8,043 full-time equivalent employees, 388 domestic branches, and 473 ATMs, compared to 7,999 full-time equivalent employees, 392 domestic branches, and 494 ATMs at June 30, 2004.
Income Taxes
The Company’s income tax expense increased to $66.3 million for the second quarter of 2005 compared to $54.6 million for the same period in 2004. The Company’s effective income tax rates, including the effects of minority interest, were 35.8% and 35.6% for the second quarters of 2005 and 2004, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the first six months of both 2005 and 2004 was 35.5%. As discussed in previous filings, the Company has received Federal income tax credits under the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund set up by the U.S. Government that will be recognized over the next seven years. The effect of these tax credits on the first half of 2005 was to reduce income tax expense by $1.5 million. No such credits were available for the first six months of 2004. The tax rates reflect a lower proportion of tax exempt income to total income, offset by the increased tax credits.
24
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
Interest-Earning Assets
Interest-earning assets are those assets that have interest rates or yields associated with them and consist of money market investments, securities and loans.
Average interest-earning assets increased 6.3% to $29.0 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $27.3 billion for the comparable period in 2004. Interest-earning assets comprised 90.1% of total average assets for the first half of 2005, compared with 89.6% for the comparable period of 2004.
Average money market investments, consisting of interest-bearing deposits, federal funds sold and security resell agreements, decreased 46.3% to $839.4 million for the first six months of 2005 compared to $1.6 billion for the first six months of 2004. Money market instruments have been used to fund new loan growth principally during the first quarter of 2005. Average net loans and leases for the first half of 2005 increased by 12.0% when compared to the same period in 2004. Average total deposits for the first six months of 2005 increased 10.6% compared to the same period in 2004.
Investment Securities Portfolio
The following table presents the Company’s held-to-maturity and available-for-sale investment securities:
(In millions)
HELD TO MATURITY
Municipal securities
AVAILABLE FOR SALE
U.S. Treasury securities
U.S. government agencies and corporations:
Small Business Administration loan-backed securities
Other agency securities
Mortgage/asset-backed and other debt securities
Other securities:
Mutual funds
Stock
Total
The amortized cost of investment securities at June 30, 2005 decreased 4.4% from the amount at December 31, 2004 but was up 4.2% from the balance at June 30, 2004. The Company’s securities portfolio increased during 2004 as it took advantage of the availability of core deposits and favorable opportunities to issue debt. However, we have been reducing the securities portfolio during the first half of 2005 to fund a portion of the Company’s new loan growth. Since loan growth is expected to continue, we anticipate that additional reductions of investment securities may be necessary.
25
The investment securities portfolio includes $1.0 billion of nonrated, fixed income securities, which is essentially unchanged from the securities balances at both December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004. These securities include nonrated municipal securities as well as nonrated, asset-backed subordinated tranches.
Loan Portfolio
Net loans and leases at June 30, 2005 were $23.8 billion, an annualized increase of 10.6% from December 31, 2004 and an increase of 10.8% over the balance at June 30, 2004. The Company experienced strong loan growth in the first half of 2005, especially during the second quarter.
The following table sets forth the loan portfolio by type of loan:
Commercial lending:
Commercial and industrial
Leasing
Owner occupied
Total commercial lending
Commercial real estate:
Construction
Term
Total commercial real estate
Consumer:
Home equity credit line
1-4 family residential
Bankcard and other revolving plans
Total consumer
Foreign loans
Other receivables
Total loans
Sold Loans Being Serviced
Zions performs loan servicing on both loans that it holds in its portfolios and also on loans that are owned by third party investor-owned trusts. In addition, Zions has a practice of securitizing and selling a portion of the loans that it originates, and in many instances provides the servicing on these loans as a condition of the sale.
As of June 30, 2005, conforming long-term first mortgage real estate loans being serviced for others were $462 million, compared with $404 million at December 31, 2004 and $326 million at June 30, 2004.
26
Home equity credit lines
Small business loans
SBA 7(a) loans
Farmer Mac
Consumer and other loan securitizations being serviced for others totaled $2.9 billion at the end of the second quarter of 2005, $3.1 billion at December 31, 2004 and $2.6 billion at June 30, 2004.
As of June 30, 2005, the Company had recorded assets, comprised of subordinated retained interests and capitalized residual cash flows, in the amount of $293 million in connection with the $2.9 billion of sold loans being serviced. As is a common practice with securitized transactions, the Company had retained subordinated interests in the securitized assets that totaled $191 million at June 30, 2005, and represented junior positions to the other investors in the trust securities. The capitalized residual cash flows, which are sometimes referred to as “excess servicing,” of $102 million primarily represent the present value of the excess cash flows that have been projected over the lives of the sold loans.
Other Noninterest-Bearing Investments
As of June 30, 2005, the Company had $699 million of other noninterest-bearing investments compared with $665 million at December 31, 2004 and $640 million at June 30, 2004.
Bank-owned life insurance
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve stock
SBIC investments
Other public companies
Other nonpublic companies
Trust preferred securities
Total deposits at the end of the second quarter of 2005 increased at an annualized rate of 9.5% from the balances reported at December 31, 2004, and increased 8.6% over the June 30, 2004 amounts. Core deposits at June 30, 2005 increased 7.7%, annualized, compared to the December 31, 2004 balance and 7.7% compared to the balance at June 30, 2004.
The mix of deposits remained favorable during the second quarter of 2005 as demand, savings and money market deposits comprised 85.1% of total deposits at the end of the second quarter, compared with 86.6% and 86.4% as of December 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004, respectively. Demand deposits accounted for most of the deposit growth in the second quarter of 2005, with savings and money market account balances declining slightly during the period. We expect to see deposit growth throughout 2005; however, we expect that the pace of such growth may be less than that of the loan portfolio. As a result, we will continue to use
27
alternative funding sources such as reducing investment securities and other lower-yielding assets and low interest rate borrowings, whenever necessary to fund the additional loan growth.
RISK ELEMENTS
Since risk is inherent in most of the Company’s operations, management of risk is an integral part of its operations and is also a key determinant of its overall performance. We apply various strategies to reduce the risks to which the Company’s operations are exposed, namely credit, operational, interest rate and market, and liquidity risks.
Credit Risk Management
Effective management of credit risk is essential in maintaining a safe and sound financial institution. We have structured the organization to separate the lending function from the credit administration function, which adds strength to the control over and the independent evaluation of credit activities. Formal loan policies and procedures provide the Company with a framework for consistent underwriting and a basis for sound credit decisions. In addition, the Company has a well-defined set of standards for evaluating its loan portfolio, and management utilizes a comprehensive loan grading system to determine the risk potential in the portfolio. Further, an independent, internal credit examination department periodically conducts examinations of the Company’s lending departments. These examinations are designed to review credit quality, adequacy of documentation, appropriate loan grading administration and compliance with lending policies, and reports thereon are submitted to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
Both the credit policy and the credit examination functions are managed centrally. Each affiliate bank is permitted to modify corporate credit policy to be more conservative; however, approval at the corporate level must be obtained if a bank wishes to create an exception to policy that is more liberal. Historically, only a limited number of such exceptions have been approved. This entire process has been designed to place an emphasis on early detection of potential problem credits so that any required action plans can be developed and implemented on a timely basis to mitigate any potential losses.
Another aspect of the Company’s credit risk management strategy is to diversify its loan portfolio. The Company maintains a diversified loan portfolio with some emphasis in real estate. As set forth in the following table, at June 30, 2005 no single loan type exceeded 19.9% of the Company’s total loan portfolio.
28
The Company’s potential risk from concentration in owner occupied commercial loans is substantially reduced by the emphasis we place on lending programs sponsored by the Small Business Administration. On these types of loans, the Small Business Administration bears a major portion of the credit risk. In addition, the Company attempts to avoid the risk of an undue concentration of credits in a particular industry, trade group or property type. The Company also has no significant exposure to highly-leveraged transactions and the majority of the Company’s business activity is with customers located within the states of Utah, Idaho, California, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, and Washington. Finally, the Company has no significant exposure to any individual customer or counterparty.
A more comprehensive discussion of our credit risk management is contained in Zions’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. In addition, as discussed in the following sections, the Company’s credit quality has improved to levels that have not been seen for the past eight years. We believe that the improvements cannot continue indefinitely.
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, restructured loans and other real estate owned. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when the loan is 90 days or more past due as to principal or interest, unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. Consumer loans, however, are not normally placed on a nonaccrual status, inasmuch as they are generally charged off when they become 120 days past due. Loans occasionally may be restructured to provide a reduction or deferral of interest or principal payments. This generally occurs when the financial condition of a borrower deteriorates to the point that the borrower needs to be given temporary or permanent relief from the original contractual terms of the loan. Other real estate owned is acquired primarily through or in lieu of foreclosure on loans secured by real estate.
29
The following table sets forth the Company’s nonperforming assets:
Nonaccrual loans
Restructured loans
% of net loans and leases* and otherreal estate owned
% of net loans and leases*
* Includes loans held for sale
Total nonperforming assets decreased 12.6% as of June 30, 2005 compared with the balance at December 31, 2004.
Included in nonaccrual loans are loans that we have determined to be impaired. Loans, other than those included in large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans, are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled interest payments. The amount of the impairment is measured based on either the present value of expected cash flows, the observable market price of the loan, or the fair value of the collateral securing the loan.
The Company’s total recorded investment in impaired loans was $36 million at June 30, 2005, compared with $41 million at December 31, 2004 and $53 million at June 30, 2004. Estimated losses on impaired loans are included in the allowance for loan losses. At June 30, 2005, the allowance for loan losses included $5 million for impaired loans with a recorded investment of $18 million. At December 31, 2004, the allowance included $9 million for impaired loans with a $27 million recorded investment, and at June 30, 2004 the allowance included $9 million for impaired loans with a $36 million recorded investment.
Allowances for Credit Losses
Allowance for Loan Losses – In analyzing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, we utilize a comprehensive loan grading system to determine the risk potential in the portfolio and also consider the results of independent internal credit reviews. To determine the adequacy of the allowance, the Company’s loan and lease portfolio is broken into segments based on loan type.
For commercial loans, we use historical loss experience factors by loan segment, adjusted for changes in trends and conditions, to help determine an indicated allowance for each portfolio segment. These factors are evaluated and updated using migration analysis techniques and other considerations based on the makeup of the specific segment. These other considerations include:
30
The allowance for consumer loans is determined using historically developed experience rates at which loans migrate from one delinquency level to the next higher level. Using average roll rates for the most recent twelve-month period and comparing projected losses to actual loss experience, the model estimates expected losses in dollars for the forecasted period. By refreshing the model with updated data, it is able to project losses for a new twelve-month period each month, segmenting the portfolio into nine product groupings with similar risk profiles. This methodology is an accepted industry practice, and the Company believes it has a sufficient volume of information to produce reliable projections.
The following table shows the changes in the allowance for loan losses and a summary of loan loss experience:
Loans* and leases outstanding (net of unearned income) at end of period
Average loans* and leases outstanding (net of unearned income)
Allowance for loan losses:
Balance at beginning of the year
Allowance of branches sold
Provision charged against earnings
Loans and leases charged-off:
Commercial lending
Commercial real estate
Consumer
Recoveries:
Net loan and lease charge-offs
Balance at end of period
Ratio of annualized net charge-offs to average loans and leases
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to net loans and leases at end of period
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans and accruing loans past due 90 days or more
31
Net loan and lease charge-offs, along with their annualized ratios to average loans and leases, are shown in the preceding table for the periods presented. The same respective amounts for the second quarter of 2005 were $3.9 million and 0.07%
The allowance for loan losses at the end of the first half of 2005 increased $10.3 million from the level at year-end 2004. During the first six months of 2005, the Company experienced a slight increase in the levels of its criticized and classified loans. As a result, the amount of the allowance for loan losses indicated for criticized and classified loans increased when compared to year-end 2004 by approximately $7.2 million. Both commercial real estate loans and the commercial lending portfolio contributed to this increase. In addition, we had a $9.2 million increase in the level of the allowance indicated for noncriticized and classified loans as a result of $1.3 billion of commercial and commercial real estate loan growth since year-end 2004. Approximately 50% of this growth was in the commercial real estate portfolio and about 50% in the commercial lending portfolio. The allowance for consumer loans at June 30, 2005 decreased by $6.2 million when compared to the allowance at the end of 2004 principally as a result of a $129 million reduction in the consumer portfolio.
Allowance for Unfunded Lending Commitments – The Company also estimates an allowance for potential losses associated with off-balance sheet commitments and standby letters of credit. We determine the allowance for unfunded lending commitments using a process that is similar to the one we use for commercial loans. Based on historical experience, we have developed experience-based loss factors that we apply to the Company’s unfunded lending commitments to estimate the potential for loss in that portfolio. These factors are generated from tracking commitments that become funded and develop into problem loans.
The following table sets forth the allowance for unfunded lending commitments:
Balance at beginning of period
Provision credited(charged) against earnings
Commitments to extend credit on loans and standby letters of credit upon which the above allowances were calculated were $4.0 billion, $3.8 billion and $3.3 billion on June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004, and June 30, 2004, respectively.
The following table sets forth the combined allowances for credit losses:
Allowance for unfunded lendingcommitments
Total allowances for credit losses
Operational Risk Management
Operational risk is the potential for unexpected losses attributable to human error, systems failures, fraud, or inadequate internal controls and procedures. In its ongoing efforts to identify and manage operational risk,
32
the Company has created an Operating Risk Management Group, whose responsibility is to help Company management identify and monitor the key internal controls and processes that the Company has in place to mitigate operational risk.
To manage and minimize its operating risk, the Company has in place transactional documentation requirements, systems and procedures to monitor transactions and positions, regulatory compliance reviews, and periodic reviews by internal audit and credit examination. In addition, reconciliation procedures have been established to ensure that data processing systems consistently and accurately capture critical data. Further, we maintain contingency plans and systems for operations support in the event of natural or other disasters. We expect to continue enhancing the Company’s oversight of operational risk throughout 2005.
Interest Rate and Market Risk Management
Interest rate risk is the potential for loss resulting from adverse changes in the level of interest rates on the Company’s net interest income. Market risk is the potential for loss arising from adverse changes in the prices of fixed income securities, equity securities, other earning assets and derivative financial instruments as a result of changes in interest rates or other factors. As a financial institution that engages in transactions involving an array of financial products, Zions is exposed to both interest rate risk and market risk.
Interest Rate Risk – Interest rate risk is one of the most significant risks to which the Company is regularly exposed. In general, our goal in managing interest rate risk is to have net interest income tend to increase in a rising interest rate environment, which tends to mitigate any declines in the market value of equity due to higher discount rates. This approach is based on our belief that in a rising interest rate environment, the market cost of equity, or implied rate at which future earnings are discounted, would also tend to rise. We refer to this goal as being slightly “asset sensitive,” which we believe is the current situation.
We attempt to control the effects that changes in interest rates will have on net interest income through the management of maturities and repricing of the Company’s assets and liabilities and also with the use of interest rate swaps. The prime lending rate and the London Interbank Offer Rate (“LIBOR”) curves are the primary indices used for pricing the Company’s loans, and the 91-day Treasury bill rate is the index used for pricing many of the Company’s deposits. The Company does not hedge the prime/LIBOR/Treasury Bill spread risk through the use of derivative instruments.
We monitor interest rate risk through the use of two complementary measurement methods: duration of equity and income simulation. In the duration of equity method, we measure the changes in the market values of equity in response to changes in interest rates. In the income simulation method, we analyze the changes in income in response to changes in interest rates. For income simulation, Company policy requires that net interest income be expected to decline by no more than 10% during one year if rates were to immediately rise or fall in parallel by 200 basis points. As of June 30, 2005, the results of the duration of equity and income simulation computations were not significantly different from those set forth in Zions’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Market Risk – Fixed Income – The Company engages in trading and market making of U.S. Treasury, U.S. Government Agency, municipal and corporate securities. This trading and market making exposes the Company to a risk of loss arising from adverse changes in the prices of these fixed income securities held by the Company.
The Company monitors its risk in fixed income trading and market making through Value-at-Risk (“VAR”). VAR is the worst-case loss expected within a specified confidence level, based on statistical models using historical data. The models used by Zions to calculate its VAR are provided by Bloomberg. The confidence level used by Zions in this analysis is 99%, which means that losses larger than the VAR would only be
33
expected on 1% of trading days (or approximately 2.5 trading days per year), assuming that the Company maintained the same VAR on a daily basis. Reports of trading income and losses and VAR measurements are reviewed with the Executive Committee of ZFNB on a monthly basis.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and year ended December 31, 2004, the results of the VAR computations were as follows:
Six months endedJune 30,
Value at Risk: (1)
Average daily VAR
Largest daily VAR during the period
Smallest daily VAR during the period
(1) Does not include nonhedge derivative portfolios.
The Company does not use VAR measurements to control risk for other than its market making and fixed income trading portfolios.
Market Risk – Equity Investments – Through its equity investment activities, the Company owns equity securities that are publicly traded and subject to fluctuations in their market prices or values. In addition, the Company owns equity securities in companies that are not publicly traded and that are accounted for under either the fair value or equity methods of accounting, depending upon the Company’s ownership position and degree of involvement in influencing the investees’ affairs. In either case, the value of the Company’s investment is subject to fluctuation. Since the market prices or values associated with these securities may fall below the Company’s investment in them, the Company is exposed to the possibility of loss.
The Company conducts minority investing in pre-public venture capital companies in which it does not have strategic involvement, through four funds collectively referred to by us as Wasatch Venture Funds (“Wasatch”). Wasatch screens investment opportunities and makes investment decisions based on its assessment of business prospects and potential returns. After an investment is made, Wasatch actively monitors the performance of each company in which it has invested, and often has representation on the board of directors of the company.
The Company also, from time to time, either starts and funds businesses or makes significant investments in companies of strategic interest. These investments may result in either minority or majority ownership positions, and usually give board representation to Zions or its subsidiaries. These strategic investments generally are in companies that are financial services or financial technologies providers.
A more comprehensive discussion of the Company’s interest rate and market risk management is contained in Zions’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Liquidity Risk Management
Liquidity is managed centrally for both the Parent and the bank subsidiaries. The Parent’s cash requirements consist primarily of debt service, operating expenses, income taxes, dividends to shareholders and share repurchases. The Parent’s cash needs are routinely met through dividends from its subsidiaries, investment income, subsidiaries’ proportionate share of current income taxes, management and other fees, bank lines, equity contributed through the exercise of stock options and debt issuances. The subsidiaries’ primary source of funding is their core deposits.
34
Operational cash flows, while constituting a funding source for the Company, are not large enough to provide funding in the amounts that fulfill the needs of the Parent and the bank subsidiaries. For the first six months of 2005, operations contributed $374.7 million toward these needs. As a result, the Company utilizes other sources at its disposal to manage its liquidity needs.
During the first six months of 2005, the Parent received $166.3 million in dividends from its subsidiaries. At June 30, 2005, $420.4 million of dividend capacity was available for the subsidiaries to pay to the Parent without having to obtain regulatory approval.
As discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the fourth quarter of 2004 for the issuance of up to $1.1 billion of debt securities of Zions Bancorporation, capital securities of Zions Capital Trust C and Zions Capital Trust D and junior subordinated debentures and guarantees related to the capital securities. As of June 30, 2005, the Company had all of the issuance capacity remaining under this registration statement.
The Parent also has a program to issue short-term commercial paper. At June 30, 2005, outstanding commercial paper was $75.4 million. In addition, at June 30, 2005, the Parent had a secured revolving credit facility with a subsidiary bank totaling $40 million. No amount was outstanding on this facility at June 30, 2005.
The subsidiaries’ primary source of funding is their core deposits, consisting of demand, savings and money market deposits, time deposits under $100,000 and foreign deposits. At June 30, 2005, these core deposits, in aggregate, constituted 93.6% of consolidated deposits, compared with 94.4% of consolidated deposits at December 31, 2004. For the first six months of 2005, increases in deposits resulted in net cash inflows of $1.1 billion.
The Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system is a major source of liquidity for each of the Company’s subsidiary banks. ZFNB and Commerce are members of the FHLB of Seattle. CB&T, NSB, and NBA are members of the FHLB of San Francisco. Vectra is a member of the FHLB of Topeka. The FHLB allows member banks to borrow against their eligible loans to satisfy liquidity requirements. For the first six months of 2005, the activity in short-term FHLB borrowings resulted in a net cash inflow of approximately $298.7 million.
The Company uses asset securitizations to sell loans, which also provide an alternative source of funding for the subsidiaries and enhance the flexibility in meeting their funding needs. During the first six months of 2005, loan sales (other than loans held for sale) provided $219.1 million in cash inflows and we expect that asset securitizations will continue to be a tool that we will use for liquidity management purposes.
While not considered a primary source of funding, the Company’s investment activities can also provide or use cash, depending on the asset-liability management posture that is being observed. For the first six months of 2005, investment securities activities resulted in a decrease in investment securities holdings and a net increase of cash in the amount of $207.5 million.
Maturing balances in the various loan portfolios also provide additional flexibility in managing cash flows. In most cases, however, growth in the loan portfolios has resulted in net cash outflows from a funding standpoint. For the first half of 2005, loan growth resulted in a net cash outflow of $1.4 billion.
35
At June 30, 2005, the Company managed approximately $2.9 billion of securitized assets that were originated or purchased by its subsidiary banks. Of these, approximately $1.7 billion were insured by a third party and held in Lockhart Funding, LLC, which is a qualifying special-purpose entity securities conduit and an important source of funding for the Company’s loans. ZFNB provides a Liquidity Facility for a fee to Lockhart, which purchases floating-rate U.S. Government and AAA-rated securities with funds from the issuance of commercial paper. ZFNB also provides interest rate hedging support and administrative and investment advisory services for a fee. Pursuant to the Liquidity Facility, ZFNB is required to purchase securities from Lockhart to provide funds for it to repay maturing commercial paper upon Lockhart’s inability to access the commercial paper market, or upon a commercial paper market disruption, as specified in the governing documents of Lockhart. In addition, pursuant to the governing documents, including the Liquidity Facility, if any security in Lockhart is downgraded below AA-, ZFNB must either 1) issue a letter of credit on the security, 2) obtain a credit enhancement on the security from a third party, or 3) purchase the security from Lockhart at book value. As discussed earlier, one such security was repurchased during the second quarter of 2005. At any given time, the maximum commitment of ZFNB is the book value of Lockhart’s securities portfolio, which is not allowed to exceed the size of the Liquidity Facility.
At June 30, 2005, the book value of Lockhart’s securities portfolio was $5.0 billion, which approximated market value and the size of the Liquidity Facility commitment was $6.12 billion. No amounts were outstanding under this Liquidity Facility at June 30, 2005, December 31, 2004 or June 30, 2004. Lockhart is limited in size by program agreements, agreements with rating agencies and by the size of the Liquidity Facility.
A more comprehensive discussion of our liquidity management is contained in Zions’ Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
Zions has a fundamental financial objective to consistently produce superior risk-adjusted returns on its shareholders’ capital. We believe that a strong capital position is vital to continued profitability and to promoting depositor and investor confidence.
Total shareholders’ equity on June 30, 2005 was $2.9 billion, up 5.3% from $2.8 billion at December 31, 2004 and 11.4% from $2.6 billion at June 30, 2004. The Company’s capital ratios were as follows as of the dates indicated:
36
Average common equity to average assets (three months ended)
Risk-based capital ratios:
Tier 1 leverage
Tier 1 risk-based capital
Total risk-based capital
During the second quarter of 2005, the Company repurchased 713,001 shares of common stock under repurchase programs approved by the Board of Directors at a cost of $49.9 million and an average price of $70.04 per share. This brought the total shares repurchased for the first half of 2005 to 1,149,522 shares at a total cost of $80.0 million and an average price of $69.60 per share. As of June 30, 2005, the Company had $60.0 million remaining in its currently authorized share repurchase program. On July 6, 2005, the Company announced that it had suspended the repurchase of shares in conjunction with its pending acquisition of Amegy Bancorporation, Inc., as we anticipate that the acquisition will have the effect of reducing the Company’s tangible common equity ratio (see “Subsequent Event”).
Dividends paid of $0.36 per common share in the second quarter of 2005 represent a 12.5% increase over the dividends paid in the same period of 2004. For the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company paid $32.5 million in common stock dividends compared to $28.8 million in the same period of 2004.
We continue to believe that the Company has adequate levels of capital in relation to its balance sheet size, business mix and levels of risk. As a result, we do not presently expect that the capital ratios will materially increase from their present levels. It is our belief that capital not considered necessary to support current and anticipated business should be returned to the Company’s shareholders through dividends and repurchases of its shares.
At its July 2005 meeting, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a dividend in the amount of $0.36 per share of common stock. The dividend is payable on August 24, 2005 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 10, 2005.
SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On July 6, 2005, the Company and Amegy Bancorporation, Inc. issued a joint press release announcing that the two companies had signed a definitive agreement under which Zions will acquire Amegy. Upon completion of the transaction, Amegy will operate under its current name, charter and management as a separate Zions banking subsidiary. The merger is subject to regulatory approval and also approval by the shareholders of Amegy and is expected to close during the fourth quarter of this year. The Company has filed a Form 8-K dated July 6, 2005 and an amended Form 8-K dated July 8, 2005, that contain the details of the transaction along with the Agreement and Plan of Merger.
37
Interest rate and market risks are among the most significant risks regularly undertaken by the Company, and they are closely monitored as previously discussed. A discussion regarding the Company’s management of interest rate and market risk is included in the section entitled “Interest Rate and Market Risk Management” in this Form 10-Q.
An evaluation was carried out by the Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
The Company is a defendant in various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any such proceedings will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, operations, or liquidity.
Share Repurchases
The following table summarizes the Company’s share repurchases for the second quarter of 2005.
Period
April
May
June
Quarter
38
Proxies were solicited by the Company’s management pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Those directors nominated (Proposal 1) in the proxy statement are shown under c) below. There was no solicitation opposing management’s nominees for directors and all such nominees were elected pursuant to the vote of the shareholders. Directors whose terms of office continued after the meeting were:
Withhold
Authority
Jerry C. Atkin
Stephen D. Quinn
Shelly Thomas Williams
2)
Approval of the Zions Bancorporation 2005 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (Proposal 2):
For
Against
Abstain and Non-Votes
35,959,644
3)
Approval of the Zions Bancorporation 2005 Management Incentive Plan (Proposal 3):
46,310,580
4)
Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s Independent Auditors for fiscal 2005
(Proposal 4):
71,251,144
39
a) Exhibits
Description
40
S I G N A T U R E S
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
/s/ HARRIS H. SIMMONS
Harris H. Simmons, Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ DOYLE L. ARNOLD
Doyle L. Arnold, Vice Chairman
and Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 8, 2005
41