AeroVironment - 10-Q quarterly report FY2016 Q3

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the quarterly period ended January 30, 2016

OR

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                 to                 

Commission File Number: 001-33261

AEROVIRONMENT, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(626) 357-9983

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No x

As of February 26, 2016, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.0001 par value, was 23,357,076.

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Table of Contents

2

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AeroVironment, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands except share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

3

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(In thousands except share and per share data)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

4

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

5

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(In thousands)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

6

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

AeroVironment, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is engaged in the design, development, production, support and operation of unmanned aircraft systems (“UAS”) and efficient energy systems (“EES”) for various industries and governmental agencies.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions of Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation with respect to the interim financial statements have been included. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended January 30, 2016, are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year ending April 30, 2016. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended April 30, 2015, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions, including estimates of anticipated contract costs and revenue utilized in the revenue recognition process, that affect the reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and operating results of wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Out-of-Period Adjustments

During the three months ended January 30, 2016, the Company identified the following errors: 1) other current liabilities and the related cost of sales, selling, general and administrative and research and development expenses were understated due to state use taxes owed for certain internally consumed tangible assets not identified on a timely basis; and 2) property and equipment, net, were understated, capital lease obligations were understated, operating cash flows were understated, and investing cash flows were overstated due to certain IT equipment and perpetual software license capital lease agreements being incorrectly classified as operating leases. The Company assessed the materiality of these errors considering the relevant quantitative and qualitative factors and concluded that the errors were not material to the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. As such, during the three months ended January 30, 2016, the Company recorded the following out-of-period adjustments to correct the errors: 1) increased  “other current liabilities” $747,000, increased “research and development” expense $503,000, increased “selling, general and administrative” expense $155,000, and increased cost of sales $89,000; and 2) increased “property and equipment, net”, $584,000, increased “Capital lease obligations — net of current portion” $319,000, and increased capital lease obligations — current portion $324,000 which is included in “Other current liabilities”.  In addition, $220,000 of cash outflows were reclassified from operating activities to “Principal payments on capital lease agreements” within financing activities. The consolidated statements of operations and consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended January 30, 2016, the consolidated balance sheet as of January 30, 2016 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended January 30, 2016 reflect the above adjustments.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Segments

The Company’s products are sold and divided among two reportable segments to reflect the Company’s strategic goals. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise from which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s CODM is the Chief Executive Officer, who reviews the revenue and gross margin results for each of these segments in order to make resource allocation decisions, including the focus of research and development (“R&D”) activities and performance

7

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

assessment. The Company’s reportable segments are business units that offer different products and services and are managed separately.

Investments

The Company’s investments are accounted for as held-to-maturity and available-for-sale and reported at amortized cost and fair value, respectively.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

Fair values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, unbilled receivables, retentions and accounts payable approximate cost due to the short period of time to maturity.

8

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Government Contracts

Payments to the Company on government cost reimbursable contracts are based on provisional, or estimated indirect rates, which are subject to an annual audit by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”). The cost audits result in the negotiation and determination of the final indirect cost rates that the Company may use for the period(s) audited. The final rates, if different from the provisional billing rates, may create an additional receivable or liability for the Company.  For example, during the course of its audits, the DCAA may question the Company’s incurred project costs, and if the DCAA believes the Company has accounted for such costs in a manner inconsistent with the requirements under Federal Acquisition Regulations, the DCAA auditor may recommend to the Company’s administrative contracting officer to disallow such costs. The Company can provide no assurance that the DCAA or other government audits will not result in material disallowances for incurred costs in the future.

The Defense Contract Management Agency, or (“DCMA”), has disallowed a portion of the Company’s executive compensation and other costs included in the Company’s fiscal year 2006 incurred cost claim and sought interest and penalties. The Company and DCMA have resolved most of these claims. However, the Company is vigorously defending its position on the government’s remaining claims for the fiscal 2006 incurred cost claim, which the Company has appealed to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. Based on the Company’s current understanding of the facts and the amount in dispute, the Company believes that the outcome of these disputes will not have a material impact on the Company’s business. Claims related to other fiscal years were settled during the nine months ended January 30, 2016, as described in Note 9. As of January 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015, the Company had reserves for incurred cost claim audits for various fiscal years.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding, excluding shares of unvested restricted stock.

The reconciliation of basic to diluted shares is as follows:

During the three months ended January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015 and the nine months ended January 30, 2016, certain shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of stock options, shares of unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. The number of shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of stock options, shares of unvested restricted stock and restricted stock units that met this anti-dilutive criterion for the three months ended January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015 and the nine months ended January 30, 2016 was approximately 9,000, 11,000 and 40,000, respectively.  Due to the net loss for the nine months ended January 31, 2015, no shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of stock options or shares of unvested restricted stock were included in the computation of diluted loss per share as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This ASU requires the lessee to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leases with terms of 12 months or more. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods therein, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of this adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.  This update simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes, by requiring that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The current requirement that deferred tax liabilities and assets of a tax-paying component of an entity be offset and presented as a single amount is not affected by the amendments in this update. This update is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.  This ASU does not apply to inventory that is measured using last-in, first-out (LIFO) or the retail inventory method.  The amendments apply to all other inventory, which includes inventory that is measured using first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost.  This ASU eliminates from U.S. GAAP the requirement to measure inventory at the lower of cost or market.  Market under the previous requirement could be replacement cost, net realizable value, or net realizable value less an approximately normal profit margin.  Entities within the scope of this update will now be required to measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value.  Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.  Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory using LIFO or the retail inventory method.  The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, with early adoption permitted.  The Company is evaluating the potential impact of this adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The new standard was originally effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adoption was not permitted. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 640)-Deferral of the Effective Date. This update

9

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

approved a one year delay of the effective date to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, while permitting companies to voluntarily adopt the new standard as of the original effective date. The Company is currently evaluating when to adopt the new standard and the potential impact of adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

2. Investments

Investments consist of the following (in thousands):

Held-To-Maturity Securities

As of January 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015, the balance of held-to-maturity securities consisted of state and local government municipal securities, U.S. treasury and agency securities, and corporate bonds. Interest earned from these investments is recorded in interest income.

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair value of the held-to-maturity investments as of January 30, 2016, were as follows (in thousands):

10

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair value of the held-to-maturity investments as of April 30, 2015, were as follows (in thousands):

The amortized cost and fair value of the held-to-maturity securities by contractual maturity at January 30, 2016, were as follows (in thousands):

Available-For-Sale Securities

Auction Rate Securities

As of January 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015, the entire balance of available-for-sale, auction rate securities, consisted of two investment grade auction rate municipal bonds, with maturities of approximately 3 and 18 years, respectively. These investments have characteristics similar to short-term investments, because at pre-determined intervals, generally ranging from 30 to 35 days, there is a new auction process at which the interest rates for these securities are reset to current interest rates. At the end of such period, the Company chooses to roll-over its holdings or redeem the investments for cash. A market maker facilitates the redemption of the securities and the underlying issuers are not required to redeem the investment within 365 days. Interest earned from these investments is recorded in interest income.

During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended April 30, 2008, the Company began experiencing failed auctions on some of its auction rate securities. A failed auction occurs when a buyer for the securities cannot be obtained and the market maker does not buy the security for its own account. The Company continues to earn interest on the investments that failed to settle at auction, at the maximum contractual rate until the next auction occurs. In the event the Company needs to access funds invested in these auction rate securities, the Company may not be able to liquidate these securities at the fair value recorded on January 30, 2016, until a future auction of these securities is successful or a buyer is found outside of the auction process.

As a result of the failed auctions, the fair values of these securities are estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis as of January 30, 2016. The analysis considers, among other items, the collateralization underlying the security investments, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, and the estimated date upon which the security is expected to have a successful auction. Based on the Company’s ability to access its cash and cash equivalents, expected operating cash flows, and other sources of cash, the Company does not anticipate that the current lack of liquidity of these investments will affect its ability to operate the business in the ordinary course. The Company believes the current lack of liquidity of these investments is temporary and expects that the securities will be redeemed or refinanced at some point in the future. The Company will continue to monitor the value of its auction rate securities at each reporting period for a possible impairment if a further decline in fair value occurs. The auction rate securities have been in an unrealized loss position for more than 12 months. The Company has the ability and the intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity and as of January 30, 2016, the Company did not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired.

11

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair value of the auction rate securities as of January 30, 2016, were as follows (in thousands):

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair value of the auction rate securities as of April 30, 2015, were as follows (in thousands):

The amortized cost and fair value of the auction rate securities by contractual maturity at January 30, 2016, were as follows (in thousands):

Equity Securities

At April 30, 2015, the entire balance of available-for-sale equity securities consisted of 618,042 CybAero AB (“CybAero”) common shares. The shares were classified as available-for-sale.  These shares were initially acquired on August 11, 2014, when the Company converted a convertible bond into CybAero common shares. The convertible bond was in the amount of 10 million SEK and was converted into 1,062,699 common shares of CybAero at the conversion price of 9.41 SEK per share. When the Company converted the bond on August 11, 2014, the fair value per share was 37.50 SEK which became the new cost basis going forward, with all subsequent changes in fair value being recorded to other comprehensive income.

At August 1, 2015, the Company reviewed these shares for impairment based on criteria that included the extent to which the investment’s carrying value exceeds its related market value, the duration of the market decline, uncertainty as to the recovery period due to sustained losses of the investee and the Company’s intent to hold its investment until recovery. In the three months ended August 1, 2015, the Company determined it was in its best interests to liquidate the remaining shares held. As a result, during the three months ended August 1, 2015, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary-impairment loss of $2,186,000 related to the Company’s investment in the CybAero shares which was recorded to Other expense in the consolidated statement of operations. As a result of recording the impairment charge, the investment’s fair value became its new cost basis. During the three months ended January 30, 2016, and the three and nine months ended January 31, 2015 there was no impairment charge recorded.

In August 2015, the Company sold its remaining shares in CybAero in a private sale at the price of 12.00 SEK per share, resulting in proceeds of approximately $777,000.  During the nine months ended January 30, 2016, the Company realized gains on the sale of CybAero shares of $207,000, based on the difference between the original conversion price of 9.41 SEK per share and the sales price at the time of sale, inclusive of the final sale of all shares.  During the three and nine months ended January 31, 2015, the Company realized gains on the sale of CybAero shares of approximately $300,000 and $4,500,000, respectively. At January 30, 2016, the Company did not hold any CybAero stock.

The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses, and estimated fair value of the equity securities as of April 30, 2015, were as follows (in thousands):

12

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

3. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy contains three levels as follows:

·                Level 1 — Inputs to the valuation based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are accessible as of the measurement date.

·                Level 2 — Inputs to the valuation include quoted prices in either markets that are not active, or in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

·                Level 3 — Inputs to the valuation that are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The Company’s financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at January 30, 2016, were as follows (in thousands):

The following table provides a reconciliation between the beginning and ending balances of items measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the table above that used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):

The auction rate securities are valued using a discounted cash flow model.  The analysis considers, among other items, the collateralization underlying the security investments, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, and the estimated date upon which the security is expected to have a successful auction.  As of January 30, 2016, the inputs used in the Company’s discounted cash flow analysis included current coupon rates of 0.47% and 0.39%, estimated redemption periods of 3 and 18 years and discount rates of 4.90% and 14.40%. The discount rates were based on market rates for municipal bond securities, as adjusted for a risk premium to reflect the lack of liquidity of these investments.

4. Inventories, net

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

13

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

5. Warranty Reserves

The Company accrues an estimate of its exposure to warranty claims based upon both current and historical product sales data and warranty costs incurred. The warranty reserve is included in other current liabilities. The related expense is included in cost of sales.  Warranty reserve activity is summarized as follows for the three and nine months ended January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015 (in thousands):

6. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and Reclassifications Adjustments

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss and adjustments are as follows (in thousands):

7. Customer-Funded Research & Development

Customer-funded R&D costs are incurred pursuant to contracts (revenue arrangements) to perform R&D activities according to customer specifications. These costs are direct contract costs and are expensed to cost of sales when the corresponding revenue is recognized, which is generally as the R&D services are performed. Revenue from customer-funded R&D was approximately $8,877,000 and $35,638,000 for the three and nine months ended January 30, 2016, respectively.  Revenue from customer-funded R&D was approximately $7,989,000 and $17,902,000 for the three and nine months ended January 31, 2015, respectively.

8. Income Taxes

For the three and nine months ended January 30, 2016, the Company recorded a (benefit) for income taxes of $(1,133,000) and $(2,821,000), respectively, yielding an effective tax benefit rate of (22.5)% and (361.2)%, respectively.  For the three and nine months ended January 31, 2015, the Company recorded a provision (benefit) for income taxes of $2,763,000 and $(917,000), respectively, yielding an effective tax rate of 54.3% and (18.0)%, respectively.  The variance from statutory rates for the three and nine months ended January 30, 2016, was primarily due to federal legislation reinstating the federal research and development tax credit during the current quarter.

9. Government Contract Reserves

During the nine months ended January 30, 2016, the Company entered into settlement agreements with DCMA related to the Company’s incurred cost claims for fiscal years 2007 through 2009.  As a result of the settlement agreements, the Company paid $50,000 and reversed the remaining reserve amount of $3,499,000 related to those fiscal years as a credit to cost of sales, allocated as $3,111,000 to the UAS segment and $388,000 to the EES segment during the three months ended October 31, 2015.  No settlements or changes to reserve estimates occurred during the three months ended January 30, 2016.

10. Share Repurchase

In September 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $25,000,000 of the Company’s common stock with no specified termination date for the program. During the nine months ended January 30, 2016, the Company

14

Table of Contents

AeroVironment, Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

repurchased and retired 183,261 shares of the Company’s common stock for a total of $3,756,000.  No shares were repurchased under the program during the three months ended January 30, 2016.  All shares repurchased were executed in the open market and no shares were repurchased from related parties. Repurchased shares were retired and assumed the status of authorized and unissued shares.

11. Segment Data

The Company’s product segments are as follows:

·                                          Unmanned Aircraft Systems — The UAS segment focuses primarily on the design, development, production, support and operation of innovative UAS and tactical missile systems that provide situational awareness, multi-band communications, force protection and other mission effects to increase the security and effectiveness of the operations of the Company’s customers.

·                                          Efficient Energy Systems — The EES segment focuses primarily on the design, development, production, marketing, support and operation of innovative efficient electric energy systems that address the growing demand for electric transportation solutions.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies.” The operating segments do not make sales to each other. Depreciation and amortization related to the manufacturing of goods is included in gross margin for the segments. The Company does not discretely allocate assets to its operating segments, nor does the CODM evaluate operating segments using discrete asset information. Consequently, the Company operates its financial systems as a single segment for accounting and control purposes, maintains a single indirect rate structure across all segments, has no inter-segment sales or corporate elimination transactions, and maintains limited financial statement information by segment. The segment results are as follows (in thousands):

15

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.                MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This section and other parts of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “predicts,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “would” or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, our management’s beliefs and assumptions made by our management. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

Unless required by law, we expressly disclaim any obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. When we prepare these consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Some of our accounting policies require that we make subjective judgments, including estimates that involve matters that are inherently uncertain. Our most critical estimates include those related to revenue recognition, inventories and reserves for excess and obsolescence, self-insured liabilities, accounting for stock-based awards, and income taxes. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for our judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

There have been no material changes made to the critical accounting estimates during the periods presented in the consolidated financial statements from those disclosed in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2015.

We review cost performance and estimates to complete at least quarterly and in many cases more frequently. Adjustments to original estimates for a contract’s revenue, estimated costs at completion and estimated profit or loss are often required as work progresses under a contract, as experience is gained and as more information is obtained, even though the scope of work required under the contract may not change, or if contract modifications occur. The impact of revisions in profit estimates for all types of contracts are recognized on a cumulative catch-up basis in the period in which the revisions are made. During the three and nine months ended January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, changes in accounting estimates on fixed-price contracts recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting are presented below.

For the three months ended January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, favorable and unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments included in cost of sales were as follows (in thousands):

For the three months ended January 30, 2016, favorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $0.5 million were primarily due to final cost adjustments on 14 contracts, which individually were not material. For the same period, unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $0.2 million were primarily related to higher than expected costs on 15 contracts, which individually were not material.

For the three months ended January 31, 2015, favorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $1.0 million were primarily due to final cost adjustments on 29 contracts, which individually were not material. For the same period, unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $0.3 million were primarily related to higher than expected costs on 235 contracts, which individually were not material.

16

Table of Contents

For the nine months ended January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015, favorable and unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments included in cost of sales were as follows (in thousands):

For the nine months ended January 30, 2016, favorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $0.5 million were primarily due to final cost adjustments on 16 contracts, which individually were not material. For the same period, unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $0.2 million were primarily related to higher than expected costs on 15 contracts, which individually were not material.

For the nine months ended January 31, 2015, favorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $1.0 million were primarily due to final cost adjustments on 27 contracts, which individually were not material. For the same period, unfavorable cumulative catch-up adjustments of $0.9 million were primarily related to higher than expected costs on 171 contracts, which individually were not material.

Fiscal Periods

Due to our fixed year end date of April 30, our first and fourth quarters each consist of approximately 13 weeks. The second and third quarters each consist of exactly 13 weeks. Our first three quarters end on a Saturday.  Our 2016 fiscal year ends on April 30, 2016 and our fiscal quarters end on August 1, 2015, October 31, 2015 and January 30, 2016.

Results of Operations

Our operating segments are Unmanned Aircraft Systems, or UAS, and Efficient Energy Systems, or EES. The accounting policies for each of these segments are the same. In addition, a significant portion of our research and development, or R&D, selling, general and administrative, or SG&A, and general overhead resources are shared across our segments.

17

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth our revenue and gross margin generated by each operating segment for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Three Months Ended January 30, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended January 31, 2015

Revenue. Revenue for the three months ended January 30, 2016 was $67.6 million, as compared to $68.4 million for the three months ended January 31, 2015, representing a decrease of $0.8 million, or 1%. The decrease in revenue was due to a decrease in product deliveries of $3.0 million, partially offset by an increase in service revenue of $2.2 million. UAS revenue increased $3.1 million, or 5%, to $61.1 million for the three months ended January 30, 2016, primarily due to an increase in service revenue of $1.3 million, an increase in customer-funded R&D work of $0.9 million, and an increase in product deliveries of $0.9 million. The increase in service revenue was primarily due to an increase in services for small UAS. The increase in customer-funded R&D was primarily due to an increase in development programs related to tactical missile systems. The increase in product deliveries was primarily due to an increase in product deliveries of small UAS. EES revenue decreased $3.9 million, or 38%, to $6.5 million for the three months ended January 30, 2016, primarily due to a decrease in product deliveries of our industrial fast charge systems and in product deliveries of our passenger electric vehicle charging systems.

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for the three months ended January 30, 2016 was $40.9 million, as compared to $41.4 million for the three months ended January 31, 2015, representing a decrease of $0.5 million, or 1%. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales was consistent at 61% during the three months ended January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015. The decrease in cost of sales was primarily due to a decrease in product costs of $1.0 million, primarily due to the decrease in product deliveries, partially offset by an increase in cost of services of $0.5 million primarily due to the increase in services revenue. UAS cost of sales increased $3.2 million, or 10%, to $36.5 million for the three months ended January 30, 2016, primarily due to the increase in sales volume. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales for UAS increased from 57% to 60%, primarily due to product mix.  EES cost of sales decreased $3.7 million, or 45%, to $4.4 million for the three months ended January 30, 2016, primarily due to the decreased sales volume. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales for EES decreased from 79% to 69% primarily due to product mix.

Gross Margin. Gross margin for the three months ended January 30, 2016 was $26.6 million, as compared to $27.0 million for the three months ended January 31, 2015, representing a decrease of $0.4 million, or 1%. The decrease in gross margin was due to a decrease in product margins of $2.0 million, largely offset by an increase in service revenue margins of $1.6 million. As a percentage of revenue, gross margin was consistent at 39% during the three months ended January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015. UAS gross margin decreased to $24.6 million for the three months ended January 30, 2016 from $24.8 million. As a percentage of revenue, gross margin for UAS decreased from 43% to 40%, primarily due to product mix. EES gross margin decreased $0.2 million, or 9%, to $2.0 million for the three months ended January 30, 2016 primarily due to the decreased sales volume.  As a percentage of revenue, EES gross margin increased from 21% to 31%, primarily due to product mix.

18

Table of Contents

Selling, General and Administrative.  SG&A expense for the three months ended January 30, 2016 was $13.3 million, or 20% of revenue, compared to SG&A expense of $13.3 million, or 19% of revenue, for the three months ended January 31, 2015.

Research and Development. R&D expense for the three months ended January 30, 2016 was $8.2 million, or 12% of revenue, compared to R&D expense of $8.6 million, or 13% of revenue, for the three months ended January 31, 2015.  R&D expense decreased by $0.3 million for the three months ended January 30, 2016, primarily due to decreased development activities for certain strategic initiatives.

Interest Income, net. Interest income, net for the three months ended January 30, 2016 was $0.2 million compared to interest income, net of $0.2 million for the three months ended January 31, 2015.

Other Expense, net.  Other expense, net for the three months ended January 30, 2016 was $0.2 million compared to other expense, net of $0.3 million for the three months ended January 31, 2015.

(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective income tax benefit rate was (22.5)% for the three months ended January 30, 2016, as compared to an effective income tax rate of 54.3% for the three months ended January 31, 2015. The tax benefit for the three months ended January 30, 2016, was primarily due to federal legislation reinstating the federal research and development tax credit during the three months ended January 30, 2016.

Nine Months Ended January 30, 2016 Compared to Nine Months Ended January 31, 2015

Revenue. Revenue for the nine months ended January 30, 2016 was $179.3 million, as compared to $172.9 million for the nine months ended January 31, 2015, representing an increase of $6.4 million, or 4%. The increase in revenue was due to an increase in service revenue of $19.0 million, partially offset by a decrease in product deliveries of $12.6 million. UAS revenue increased $15.6 million, or 11%, to $157.8 million for the nine months ended January 30, 2016, primarily due to an increase in customer-funded R&D work of $17.7 million, and an increase in service revenue of $1.8 million, partially offset by a decrease in product deliveries of $4.0 million. The increase in customer-funded R&D work was primarily due to an increase in development programs related to tactical missile systems and large UAS. The increase in service revenue was primarily due to an increase in services for small UAS. The decrease in product deliveries was primarily due to a decrease in deliveries of our tactical missile systems. EES revenue decreased $9.2 million, or 30%, to $21.5 million for the nine months ended January 30, 2016, primarily due to a decrease in product deliveries of our industrial fast charge systems and in product deliveries of our passenger electric vehicle charging systems.

19

Table of Contents

Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for the nine months ended January 30, 2016 was $105.2 million, as compared to $114.0 million for the nine months ended January 31, 2015, representing a decrease of $8.8 million, or 8%. Cost of sales was impacted by a government contract accounting reserve reduction of $3.5 million recorded in the nine months ended January 30, 2016 for the settlement of prior year incurred cost audits.  As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales decreased from 66% to 59%. The decrease in cost of sales was primarily due to a decrease in product costs of $18.0 million due to a decrease in product deliveries, partially offset by an increase in cost of services of $9.2 million, primarily due to an increase in services revenue. UAS cost of sales decreased $0.6 million, or 1%, to $91.3 million for the nine months ended January 30, 2016, primarily due to product mix. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales for UAS decreased from 65% to 58% due to product mix and the government contract reserve reduction. EES cost of sales decreased $8.3 million, or 37%, to $13.9 million for the nine months ended January 30, 2016 primarily due to the decrease in sales volume. As a percentage of revenue, cost of sales for EES decreased from 72% to 65%, primarily due to product mix and the government contract reserve reduction.

Gross Margin. Gross margin for the nine months ended January 30, 2016 was $74.2 million, as compared to $58.9 million for the nine months ended January 31, 2015, representing an increase of $15.3 million, or 26%. The increase in gross margin was due to an increase in service revenue margins of $9.8 million and product margins of $5.4 million, both of which were impacted by the government contract reserve reduction. As a percentage of revenue, gross margin increased from 34% to 41%. UAS gross margin increased $16.2 million, or 32%, to $66.6 million for the nine months ended January 30, 2016.  The increase was primarily due to an increase in margins on product sales and service-related contracts, and the government contract reserve reduction.  As a percentage of revenue, gross margin for UAS increased from 35% to 42%. EES gross margin decreased $0.9 million, or 11%, to $7.6 million for the nine months ended January 30, 2016 primarily due to lower sales volume.  As a percentage of revenue, EES gross margin increased from 28% to 35%, primarily due to product mix and the government contract reserve reduction.

Selling, General and Administrative.  SG&A expense for the nine months ended January 30, 2016 was $43.3 million, or 24% of revenue, compared to SG&A expense of $40.1 million, or 23% of revenue, for the nine months ended January 31, 2015. SG&A expense increased by $3.2 million primarily due to higher bid and proposal costs, as well as other increases which were not individually significant.

Research and Development. R&D expense for the nine months ended January 30, 2016 was $28.0 million, or 16% of revenue, compared to R&D expense of $24.2 million, or 14% of revenue, for the nine months ended January 31, 2015.  R&D expense increased by $3.7 million for the nine months ended January 30, 2016, primarily due to increased development activities for certain strategic initiatives.

Interest Income, net. Interest income, net for the nine months ended January 30, 2016 was $0.7 million compared to interest income, net of $0.6 million for the nine months ended January 31, 2015.

Other Expense, net.  Other expense, net for the nine months ended January 30, 2016 was $2.8 million compared to other expense, net of $0.3 million for the nine months ended January 31, 2015. The increase was primarily due to the recording of an other-than-temporary impairment loss of $2.2 million related to available-for-sale equity securities in the nine months ended January 30, 2016. No impairment loss was recorded in the nine months ended January 31, 2015.

(Benefit) Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective income tax benefit rate was (361.2)% for the nine months ended January 30, 2016, as compared to an effective income tax benefit rate of (18.0)% for the nine months ended January 31, 2015.  The tax benefit for the nine months ended January 30, 2016, was primarily due to federal legislation reinstating the federal research and development tax credit during the three months ended January 30, 2016.

Backlog

We define funded backlog as unfilled firm orders for products and services for which funding currently is appropriated to us under the contract by the customer. As of January 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015, our funded backlog was approximately $79.7 million and $64.7 million, respectively.

In addition to our funded backlog, we also had unfunded backlog of $16.7 million and $19.1 million as of January 30, 2016 and April 30, 2015, respectively.  We define unfunded backlog as the total remaining potential order amounts under cost reimbursable and fixed price contracts with multiple one-year options, and indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity, or IDIQ contracts. Unfunded backlog does not obligate the U.S. government to purchase goods or services. There can be no assurance that unfunded backlog will result in any orders in any particular period, if at all. Management believes that unfunded backlog does not provide a reliable measure of future estimated revenue under our contracts. Unfunded backlog does not include the remaining potential value associated with a U.S. Army IDIQ-type contract for small UAS because the contract was awarded to five companies in 2012, including AeroVironment, and we cannot be certain that we will receive task orders issued against the contract.

Because of possible future changes in delivery schedules and/or cancellations of orders, backlog at any particular date is not necessarily representative of actual sales to be expected for any succeeding period, and actual sales for the year may not meet or

20

Table of Contents

exceed the backlog represented. Our backlog is typically subject to large variations from quarter to quarter as existing contracts expire, or are renewed, or new contracts are awarded. A majority of our contracts, specifically our IDIQ contracts, do not currently obligate the U.S. government to purchase any goods or services. Additionally, all U.S. government contracts included in backlog, whether or not they are funded, may be terminated at the convenience of the U.S. government.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We currently have no material cash commitments, except for normal recurring trade payables, accrued expenses and ongoing R&D costs, all of which we anticipate funding through our existing working capital and funds provided by operating activities. The majority of our purchase obligations are pursuant to funded contractual arrangements with our customers. In addition, we do not currently anticipate significant investment in property, plant and equipment, and we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, cash provided by operating activities and other financing sources will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital and capital expenditure requirements during the next twelve months. There can be no assurance, however, that our business will continue to generate cash flow at current levels. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, then we may be required to sell assets, reduce capital expenditures or obtain financing. We anticipate that existing sources of liquidity and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to satisfy our cash needs for the foreseeable future.

Our primary liquidity needs are for financing working capital, investing in capital expenditures, supporting product development efforts, introducing new products, enhancing existing products and marketing to stimulate acceptance and adoption of our products and services. Our future capital requirements, to a certain extent, are also subject to general conditions in or affecting the defense, commercial and electric vehicle industries and are subject to general economic, political, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors that are beyond our control. To the extent that existing cash, cash equivalents, and cash from operations are insufficient to fund our future activities, we may need to raise additional funds through public or private equity or debt financing. We may also need to seek additional equity funding or debt financing if we become a party to any agreement or letter of intent for potential investments in, or acquisitions of, businesses, services or technologies.

Our working capital requirements vary by contract type. On cost-plus-fee programs, we typically bill our incurred costs and fees monthly as work progresses, and therefore working capital investment is minimal. On fixed-price contracts, we typically are paid as we deliver products, and working capital is needed to fund labor and other expenses incurred during the lead time from contract award until contract deliveries begin.

Cash Flows

The following table provides our cash flow data for the nine months ended January 30, 2016 and January 31, 2015 (in thousands):

Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended January 30, 2016, increased by $22.9 million to $5.7 million, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $17.2 million for the nine months ended January 31, 2015. The increase in net cash used in operating activities was primarily due to an increase in working capital needs of $32.2 million and lower depreciation and amortization expense of $1.8 million, partially offset by increased net income of $7.8 million and an other-than-temporary impairment loss of $2.2 million on available-for-sale equity securities.

Cash Used in Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $7.3 million to $11.9 million for the nine months ended January 30, 2016, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $19.2 million for the nine months ended January 31, 2015. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to an increase in net redemptions and sales of investments of $9.1 million, partially offset by increased acquisitions of property and equipment of $1.9 million.

Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities. Net cash used in financing activities increased by $4.1 million to $3.1 million for the nine months ended January 30, 2016, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $1.0 million for the nine months ended January 31, 2015. The increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily due to the purchase and retirement of common stock of $3.8 million during the nine months ended January 30, 2016.

21

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During the third quarter, there were no material changes in our off-balance sheet arrangements or contractual obligations and commercial commitments from those disclosed in the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2015.

Inflation

Our operations have not been, and we do not expect them to be, materially affected by inflation. Historically, we have been successful in adjusting prices to our customers to reflect changes in our material and labor costs.

New Accounting Standards

Please refer to Note 1 “Organization and Significant Accounting Policies” to our unaudited consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

In the ordinary course of business, we are exposed to various market risk factors, including fluctuations in interest rates, changes in general economic conditions, domestic and foreign competition, and foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rate Risk

It is our policy not to enter into interest rate derivative financial instruments. We do not currently have any significant interest rate exposure.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Since a significant part of our sales and expenses are denominated in U.S. dollars, we have not experienced significant foreign exchange gains or losses to date, and do not expect to incur significant foreign exchange gains or losses in the future. We occasionally engage in forward contracts in foreign currencies to limit our exposure on non-U.S. dollar transactions.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.

Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described below.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of interim or annual financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the company’s internal controls.

We identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended January 30, 2016 with respect to our state use tax process.  Specifically, our controls were not properly designed to appropriately identify, calculate, and assess our obligation of state use tax for certain procured and internally consumed tangible property on a timely basis.

22

Table of Contents

We are committed to remediating the material weakness and are in the process of taking steps to enhance our internal control environment.  Our remediation plan includes, but is not limited to: updating our internal controls surrounding state use tax; training our procurement, accounts payable and accounting teams with a focus on the proper identification and recording of state use tax obligations on a timely basis; and implementing new controls related to expanding our review of the state use tax process.

We believe these actions will remediate the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described above. We will test the ongoing operating effectiveness of the new controls during the fourth fiscal quarter of 2016 as well as in future periods. The material weakness cannot be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.  We expect that the remediation of this material weakness may be completed as early as April 30, 2016.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Except as described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the quarter ended January 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

23

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings. We are, however, subject to lawsuits, government investigations, audits and other legal proceedings from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. It is not possible to predict the outcome of any legal proceeding with certainty. The outcome or costs we incur in connection with a legal proceeding could adversely impact our operating results and financial position.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2015.  Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to our business.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The following table provides information about repurchases by us of shares of our common stock during the quarter ended  January 30, 2016:

(1)         On September 24, 2015, the Company announced that on September 23, 2015 its Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program (the “Share Repurchase Program”), pursuant to which the Company may repurchase up to $25 million of its common stock from time to time, in amounts and at prices the Company deems appropriate, subject to market conditions and other considerations.  Share repurchases may be executed through open market transactions or negotiated purchases and may be made under a Rule 10b5-1 plan. There is no expiration date for the program. The Share Repurchase Program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock and may be suspended at any time by the Company’s Board of Directors. No shares were repurchased in the fiscal quarter ended January 30, 2016.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

24

Table of Contents

25

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

26